Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights in India have been evolving rapidly in recent years. However, Indian LGBT citizens continue to face social and legal difficulties not experienced by non-LGBT persons.
There are no legal restrictions against gay sex or gay expression. Same-sex couples have equal cohabitation rights, colloquially known as live-in relationships.
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 recognizes the right to self-perceived gender identity and identification as male or female can be issued once a certificate is provided by a relevant medical official. Transgender citizens have a constitutional right to register themselves under a third gender.
Additionally, some states protect hijras, a traditional third gender population in South Asia through housing programmes, and offer welfare benefits, pension schemes, free operations in government hospitals as well as other programmes designed to assist them. There are approximately 480,000 transgender people in India as per Census 2011.
Amidst strong political movements in favour of LGBT rights, people are more accepting of same-sex relationships, with around three out of four Indians supporting them according to an opinion poll. In the 2010s, LGBT people in India increasingly gained tolerance and acceptance, especially in large cities.
This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2020)
Hinduism acknowledges a third gender. There are certain characters in the Mahabharata who, according to some versions of the epic, change genders, such as Shikhandi, who is sometimes said to be born as a female but identifies as male and eventually marries a woman. Bahuchara Mata is the goddess of fertility, worshipped by hijras as their patroness.
The Nāradasmṛti and the Sushruta Samhita, two important Sanskrit texts relating to dharma and medicine, respectively, declare homosexuality to be unchangeable and forbid homosexuals from marrying a partner of the opposite sex. The Nāradasmṛti lists fourteen types of panda (men who are impotent with women); among these are the mukhebhaga (men who have oral sex with other men), the sevyaka (men who are sexually enjoyed by other men) and the irshyaka (the voyeur who watches other men engaging in sex). The Kama Sutra, a Sanskrit text on human sexual behavior, uses the term tritiya-prakriti to define men with homosexual desires and describes their practices in great detail. Likewise, the Kama Sutra describes lesbians (svairini, who engage in aggressive lovemaking with other women), bisexuals (referred to as kami or paksha), transgender and intersex people. The Sushruta Samhita and the Charaka Samhita delve further into the issue of homosexuality, stating that homosexuals are conceived when the father's semen is scanty and transgender people are conceived when the father and mother reverse roles during intercourse (purushayita, "woman on top").
However, in another Hindu text, the Manusmriti, there are various punishments for homosexuality in certain cases, along with sex for straight couples. A mature woman having sex with a maiden girl was punished by having her head shaved or two of her fingers cut off, and she was also made to ride on a donkey. In the case of homosexual males, the Manusmriti dictated that sexual union between two people (both homosexual and heterosexual) in a bullock cart would result in loss of caste and humanity.
The Hindu Khajuraho temples, famous for their erotic sculptures, contain several depictions of homosexual activity. Historians have long argued that pre-colonial Indian society did not criminalise same-sex relationships, nor did it view such relations as immoral or sinful. Hinduism has traditionally portrayed homosexuality as natural and joyful, though some texts do contain injunctions against homosexuality namely among priests.
During the Mughal Empire, a number of the pre-existing Delhi Sultanate laws were combined into the Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, mandating several types of punishments for homosexuality. These could include 50 lashes for a slave, 100 for a free infidel, or death by stoning for a Muslim.
Codification of criminalization of homosexual activity was enacted by of Section 377 by the British, which stood for more than 70 years after Indian independence. The Goa Inquisition once prosecuted the capital crime of sodomy in Portuguese India, but not lesbian activity, whereas the British Raj criminalised anal sex and oral sex (for both heterosexuals and homosexuals) under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which entered into force in 1861, and made it an offence for a person to voluntarily have "carnal intercourse against the order of nature." Scholars have also argued that the original intention of Section 377 was to act as a means by which the British Raj could further police and control the body of the colonial subject. In colonial Victorian era morality, these subjects were seen as erotically perverse and in need of the imposition.
In 1884, a court in north India, ruling on the prosecution of a hijra, commented that a physical examination of the accused revealed she "had the marks of a habitual catamite" and commended the police's desire to "check these disgusting practices". In 1871, the British labeled the hijra population as a "criminal tribe".
Two women using carrots as dildos, 20th century gouache painting.
The Delhi High Court decision in Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi of 2009 found Section 377 and other legal prohibitions against private, adult, consensual, and non-commercial same-sex conduct to be in direct violation of fundamental rights provided by the Indian Constitution. Section 377 stated that: "Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with [imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine," with the added explanation that: "Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section."
According to a previous ruling by the Indian Supreme Court, decisions of a high court on the constitutionality of a law apply throughout India, and not just to the state over which the high court in question has jurisdiction.
There have been incidents of harassment of LGBT groups by authorities under the law.
On 23 February 2012, the Ministry of Home Affairs expressed its opposition to the decriminalisation of homosexual activity, stating that in India, homosexuality is seen as being immoral. The Central Government reversed its stance on 28 February 2012, asserting that there was no legal error in decriminalising homosexual activity. The shift in stance resulted in two judges of the Supreme Court reprimanding the Central Government for frequently changing its approach to the issue.
Human Rights Watch expressed concerns that the Supreme Court ruling would render same-sex couples and individuals that had become open about their sexuality following the High Court's ruling vulnerable to police harassment and blackmail, stating that "the Supreme Court's ruling is a disappointing setback to human dignity, and the basic rights to privacy and non-discrimination" The Naz Foundation stated that it would file a petition for review of the court's decision. Activist group Kavi's Humsafar Trust have reported that two-fifths of homosexuals in the country had faced blackmail after the 2013 ruling.
On 28 January 2014, the Supreme Court of India dismissed the review petition filed by the Central Government, the Naz Foundation and several others against its 11 December verdict on Section 377. The bench explained the ruling by claiming that: "While reading down Section 377, the High Court overlooked that a minuscule fraction of the country's population constitutes lesbians, gays, bisexuals or transgender people, and in the more than 150 years past, less than 200 persons have been prosecuted for committing offence under Section 377, and this cannot be made a sound basis for declaring that Section ultra vires Articles 14, 15 and 21."
On 2 February 2016, the Supreme Court decided to review the criminalisation of homosexual activity. In August 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the right to individual privacy is an intrinsic and fundamental right under the Indian Constitution. The Court also ruled that a person's sexual orientation is a privacy issue, giving hopes to LGBT activists that the Court would soon strike down Section 377.
In January 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to refer the question of Section 377's validity to a large bench, and heard several petitions on 1 May 2018. In response to the court's request for its position on the petitions, the Government announced that it would not oppose the petitions, and would leave the case "to the wisdom of the court". A hearing began on 10 July 2018, with a verdict expected before October 2018. Activists view the case as the most significant and "greatest breakthrough for gay rights since the country's independence", and it could have far-reaching implications for other Commonwealth countries that still outlaw homosexuality.
On 6 September 2018, the Supreme Court issued its verdict. The Court unanimously ruled that Section 377 is unconstitutional as it infringed on the fundamental rights of autonomy, intimacy, and identity, thus legalising homosexuality in India. The Court explicitly overturned its 2013 judgement.
Criminalising carnal intercourse is irrational, arbitrary and manifestly unconstitutional.
History owes an apology to these people and their families. Homosexuality is part of human sexuality. They have the right of dignity and free of discrimination. Consensual sexual acts of adults are allowed for [the] LGBT community.— Justice Indu Malhotra
It is difficult to right a wrong by history. But we can set the course for the future. This case involves much more than decriminalizing homosexuality. It is about people wanting to live with dignity.— Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud
Furthermore, it ruled that any discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a violation of the Indian Constitution:
Sexual orientation is one of the many biological phenomena which is natural and inherent in an individual and is controlled by neurological and biological factors. The science of sexuality has theorized that an individual exerts little or no control over who he/she gets attracted to. Any discrimination on the basis of one's sexual orientation would entail a violation of the fundamental right of freedom of expression.
The Supreme Court also directed the Government to take all measures to properly broadcast the fact that homosexuality is not a criminal offence, to create public awareness and eliminate the stigma members of the LGBT community face, and to give the police force periodic training to sensitise them about the issue.
The judgement also included an inbuilt safeguard to ensure that it cannot be revoked again under the "Doctrine of Progressive Realisation of Rights".
Legal experts have urged the Government to pass legislation reflecting the decision, and frame laws to allow same-sex marriage, adoption by same-sex couples and inheritance rights.
Non-consensual sex (rape) and bestiality remain criminal offences. Initially, it was unknown whether the Supreme Court ruling extended to the former state of Jammu and Kashmir, which was governed by its own criminal law, the Ranbir Penal Code (RPC). Legal opinion was divided on whether the Supreme Court judgment applied to the state or not. Per a 1995 judgment of the state High Court, when an IPC (Indian Penal Code) provision is struck down on grounds of violating the Constitution, its corresponding provision in the Ranbir Penal Code too would be struck down. On 31 October 2019, the state was split into the union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, which apply the IPC. The RPC was abolished.
In September 2021, the Chennai-based Madras High Court, which has jurisdiction over Tamil Nadu, ruled that queerphobia was rampant in medical education and directed the medical institutions and police to revamp their services to support LGBTQ individuals.
On 10 April 2022, The madras High Court directed Tamil Nadu Government to conduct sensitization of school teachers on LGBT issues. The court also recommended a glossary or style-sheet to be used by Media for writing about LGBT community. The court asked the Tamil Nadu Government to adopt the glossary developed by community members till a time it can come up with its own version.
In the early weeks of January 2023, the leader of the highly influential Hindu group called RSS, often labelled as a far-right organization that provides grassroots support for the ruling BJP, backed LGBTQ rights and stated that LGBTQ rights were supported in the native Hindu culture and history.
Recognition of same-sex relationships
India does not recognise same-sex marriage or civil unions, though same-sex couples can attain the rights and benefits as a live-in couple (analogous to cohabitation) as per Supreme Court of India landmark decision Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal in August 2022.
Despite limited recognition by the lower courts, India still doesn't have a national law to regulate same-sex unions. Protections for same-sex couples have so far only come from the lower courts, not from the Parliament or the Government of India.
In 2011, a Haryana court granted legal recognition to a same-sex marriage involving two women. After marrying, the couple began to receive threats from friends and relatives in their village. The couple eventually won family approval.
Their lawyer said the court had served notice on 14 of Veena's relatives and villagers who had threatened them with "dire consequences". Haryana has been the centre of widespread protests by villagers who believe their village councils or khaps should be allowed to impose their own punishments on those who disobey their rulings or break local traditions – mainly honour killings of those who marry within their own gotra or sub-caste, regarded in the state as akin to incest. Deputy Commissioner of Police Dr. Abhe Singh told The Daily Telegraph: "The couple has been shifted to a safe house and we have provided adequate security to them on the court orders. The security is provided on the basis of threat perception and in this case the couple feared that their families might be against the relationship."
There are currently several same-sex marriage petitions pending with the courts. On 12 June 2020, the Uttarakhand High Court acknowledged that while same-sex marriage may not be legal, cohabitation and "live-in relationships" are protected by the law. A ruling by the Supreme Court of India in 2022 widened the definition of families to live-in couples inclusive of LGBT, thereby providing LGBT couples rights and benefits equal to that of married couples.
Supriyo v. Union of India (2020-present)
On 25 November 2022, the Supreme Court of India agreed to hear the case that could legalize same-sex marriage as the nine petitions pending before the Kerala and Delhi High Courts are transferred to the Supreme Court for a uniform ruling. The matter is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court on 13 March 2023.
On 19 December 2022, Sushil Modi, a prominent BJP lawmaker, told Parliament that "India is the country of 1.4 billion people and two judges cannot just sit in a room and decide on such a socially significant subject. Instead, there should be a debate in Parliament as well as the society at large" he added.
On 14 March 2023, during the press conference at the end of Akhil Bharatiya Pratinidhi Sabha, RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale backed the BJP-led Union Government's opposition to the extension of the right to marry for same-sex couples. He said marriage is an institution for the benefit of the family and society, not for physical and sexual enjoyment.
On 24 March 2023, a group of 21 retired judges of various High Courts have issued an open letter stating that legalisation of same-sex marriage will change the entire gamut of all personal laws from marriage to adoption and succession. The law-making power is vested with the Parliament and not with the judiciary, especially in matters exclusively within social and political domain, the judges have mentioned. The letter also noted, “Instead of having wide-range discussions amongst stakeholders, such a hasty judicial intervention is unfortunate, and totally unwarranted. The court should not interfere in sensitive issues like same-sex marriage. The subject is related to society and the opinion of society on these matters is important. Parliament is paramount in making laws and the MPs elected to Parliament represent the people of the country." retired Justice of High Court of Delhi added.
On 1 April 2023, Mahmood Asad Madani representing the Islamic organisation Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind sought to intervene as an opponent to legalizing same-sex marriage in India. Several other Islamic organisations including Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, All India Muslim Personal Law Board, and Telangana Markazi Shia Ulema Council also voiced their opposition to legalizing same-sex marriage.
Oral arguments began on 18 April 2023. During the hearings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who's representing the government noted that five individuals should not decide for the entire nation and issues related to human relationships, such as marriage should be addressed by parliament. The Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachuda responded: "There is no absolute concept of a man or a woman at all. You can't tell us what to do. I won't allow this in my court".
On 20 April 2023, a five-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice D. Y. Chandrachud hinted at their intention to legalize same-sex marriage, despite objections by the Indian government and religious groups.
On 21 April 2023, Bhupender Yadav, an influential Minister and the National General Secretary of the ruling BJP stated that "the issue of marriage concerns society and society's opinion on this issue cannot be excluded. The voice of society is best reflected in Parliament".
Kanav Sahgal who works for the Vidhi Center for Legal Policy noted that "homosexuality is not perceived very well in large parts of India. No matter what is decided by the Supreme Court, India's majority does not support the legalization of same-sex marriage".
The State Governments of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Gujarat , Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have opposed the legal recognition of same-sex marriages and not a single Indian State Government has expressed support for same-sex marriage.
It defines marriage as "the legal union as prescribed under this Act of a man with a woman, a man with another man, a woman with another woman a transgender with another transgender or a transgender with a man or a woman. All married couples in partnership entitled to adopt a child. Sexual orientation of the married couple or the partners not to be a bar to their right to adoption. Non-heterosexual couples will be equally entitled to adopt a child".
15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth
- (1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them
- (2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, be subject to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to
- (a) access to shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public entertainment; or
- (b) the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and places of public resort maintained wholly or partly out of State funds or dedicated to the use of the general public
In the case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, the Supreme Court ruled that the Indian Constitution bans discrimination based on sexual orientation via the category of "sex". Similarly in the case of National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that discrimination on the basis of gender identity is constitutionally prohibited.
Gender identity, in our view, is an integral part of sex and no citizen can be discriminated on the ground of gender identity, including those who identify as third gender. We, therefore, conclude that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity includes any discrimination, exclusion, restriction or preference, which has the effect of nullifying or transposing equality by the law or the equal protection of laws guaranteed under our Constitution. (p. 73)— Supreme Court Judge K. S. Panicker Radhakrishnan
Sex as it occurs in Article 15, is not merely restricted to the biological attributes of an individual, but also includes their "sexual identity and character".— Supreme Court of India
Despite these constitutional interpretations, no legislative law has been enacted to ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in employment since Article 15 only extended to discrimination from the state or government bodies. However, on 4 February 2021, the Allahabad High Court ruled that firing and discriminating against a person in employment on the basis of sexual orientation is a violation of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India ruling of the Supreme Court, hence extending the anti-discriminatory provisions to employment everywhere. In case of physical attacks against LGBT people, Section 307 (Attempt to murder) or Section 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) of the Indian Penal Code is used against the perpetrator. In case of hate speech, Section 153 A (Hate Speech Law) of the code has been previously used. The Allahabad High Court in a landmark decision in Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh stated that a Constitutional Court has a duty to monitor and observe the constitutional morality as well as the rights of the citizens which are under threat only on account of the sexual orientation. In August, 2018, the National Human Rights Commission of India set up the LGBTI core group and appointed openly gay politician Harish Iyer in its 15 members committee in a bid to enforce human rights related legislations pertaining to LGBTQ people and counter discrimination.
Adopted in 2019, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 bans discrimination against transgender people in educational establishment and services, employment, healthcare services, access to the "use of any goods, accommodation, service, facility, benefit, privilege or opportunity dedicated to the use of the general public or customarily available to the public", the right to movement, the right to "reside, purchase, rent or otherwise occupy any property", the opportunity to stand for or hold public or private office, and in government or private establishments.
There have been reservations among some in the transgender community, both regarding the difficulty of obtaining a certificate, and because of lack of awareness and lack of sensitivity to the issue among local public officials. LGBTQ protests against the bill have occurred, with claims that the bill hurts the transgender community instead of helping it. Protesters noted the provision for certification, but criticized the fact that this would require people to register with the government in order to be recognized as transgender. They also criticized the inequality inherent in the vast differences in punishment for the same crime, such as sexual abuse, committed against violating a transgender or cisgender individual.
LGBT activists are encouraging people who have faced discrimination because of their sexual orientation or gender identity in other non-state areas to mount challenges in court, seeking to test the jurisprudence set by the two rulings.
Discrimination and bullying in higher education
Discrimination, bullying and ragging targeted at a student on the ground of their sexual orientation or gender identity is prohibited under the UGC Regulation on Curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions (Third Amendment), 2016.
LGBT people are banned from openly serving in the Indian Armed Forces. In late December 2018, Member of Parliament Jagdambika Pal (BJP) introduced a bill to the Indian Parliament to amend the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 that would allow LGBT people to serve in the Armed Forces. The bill was lapsed in the Lok Sabha.
India has traditionally recognised a third gender population, considered by society as neither male or female. Such individuals are known as hijṛās or alternatively hijaḍaas (Hindi, Maithili and Dogri: हिजड़ा; Bengali: Hijṛā(হিজড়া); Nepali: हिजडा; Marathi: हिजडा). In Telugu, they are referred to as napunsakuḍu(నపుంసకుడు) or hijrā (హిజ్రా), in Urdu as khwaja sarā (ہیجڑا), in Gujarati as pāvaiyā (પાવૈયા) or hījaḍā (હીજડા), in Tamil as aravāṇi (அரவாணி), in Punjabi as khusrā (ਖੁਸਰਾ), in Odia as hiñjôḍā (ହିଂଜଡା), in Sindhi as khadrā (کدڙا), in Malayalam as ṣaṇḍan (ഷണ്ഡന്) or hijaḍa (ഹിജഡ), in Kannada as maṅgaḷamukhi (ಮಂಗಳಮುಖಿ), in Konkani as khojji (खोज्जि), in Manipuri as nupi mānbi, in Kashmiri as napunsakh (नपुंसख्), in Assamese as nôpungxôk (নপুংসক), in Santali as cākrā (ᱪᱟᱠᱨᱟ), in Sanskrit as klība (क्लीब), napuṃsa (नपुंस) or ṣaṇḍha (षण्ढ), and in Mizo as mil tilreh. In English language publications, these terms are given to eunuchs, intersex people or transgender people.
Hijras were legally granted voting rights as a third sex in 1994. Due to alleged legal ambiguity of the procedure, Indian transgender individuals have difficulties accessing safe medical facilities for surgery. On 15 April 2014, the Supreme Court of India declared transgender people a socially and economically suppressed class entitled to reservations in education and jobs, and also directed union and state governments to frame welfare schemes for them. The Court ruled that transgender people have a fundamental constitutional right to change their gender without any sort of surgery, and called on the Union Government to ensure equal treatment for transgender people. The Court also ruled that the Indian Constitution mandates the recognition of a third gender on official documents, and that Article 15 bans discrimination based on gender identity. In light of the ruling, government documents, such as voter ID cards, passports and bank forms, have started providing a third gender option alongside male (M) and female (F), usually designated as "other" (O), "third gender" (TG) or "transgender" (T).
In 2013, transgender and gender activists S. Swapna and Gopi Shankar Madurai from Srishti Madurai staged a protest in the Madurai collectorate on 7 October 2013 demanding reservation and to permit alternate genders to appear for examinations conducted by TNPSC, UPSC, SSC and Bank exams. Swapna, incidentally, had successfully moved the Madras High Court in 2013 seeking permission to write the TNPSC Group II exam as a female candidate. Swapna is the first transgender person to clear TNPSC Group IV exams.
On 24 April 2015, the Rajya Sabha unanimously passed the Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014 guaranteeing rights and entitlements, reservations in education and jobs (2% reservation in government jobs), legal aid, pensions, unemployment allowances and skill development for transgender people. It also contained provisions to prohibit discrimination in employment as well as prevent abuse, violence and exploitation of transgender people. The bill also provided for the establishment of welfare boards at the centre and state level as well as for transgender rights courts. The bill was introduced by DMK MP Tiruchi Siva, and marked the first time the upper house had passed a private member's bill in 45 years. However, the bill contained several anomalies and a lack of clarity on how various ministries would coordinate to implement its provisions. The bill was never brought to a vote in the lower house.
Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Thaawar Chand Gehlot stated on 11 June 2015 that the Union Government would introduce a new comprehensive bill for transgender rights in the Monsoon session of Parliament. The bill would be based on the study on transgender issues conducted by a committee appointed on 27 January 2014. According to Gehlot, the Government sought to provide transgender people with all rights and entitlements currently enjoyed by scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2016, which was initially introduced to Parliament in August 2016, was re-introduced to Parliament in late 2017. Some transgender activists have opposed the bill because it does not address issues such as marriage, adoption and divorce for transgender people. Akkai Padmashali criticised the bill's definition of transgenderism, which states that transgender people are "based on the underlying assumption of biological determinism". The bill passed the Lok Sabha on 17 December 2018 with 27 amendments, including a controversial clause prohibiting transgender people from begging. The bill was sent to a parliamentary committee, but lapsed with the dissolution of the 16th Lok Sabha.
A government bill, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, was reintroduced to Parliament after the 2019 general election. The bill was approved on 10 July by the Cabinet of India. The bill defines transgender persons as those "whose gender does not match the gender assigned to that person at birth and includes trans-men or trans-women, persons with intersex variations, gender-queers, and persons having socio-cultural identities such as kinnar, hijras, aravani and jogta". A person would have the right to choose to be identified as male, female or "transgender". However, transgender people are required to go to a district magistrate to have their gender identity certified, and require proof of sex reassignment surgery. The bill prohibits discrimination against transgender people in nine fields, such as education, employment and healthcare. However, transgender activists criticised that the bill is silent on a real remedy or mechanism to integrate transgender people into public spaces and improve the quality of their lives, or on how the State intends to enforce this, or about what the State will do, if and when such discrimination does occur. The bill was also criticised for not taking into account any of the suggestions made by transgender activists; namely that it only provides for transgender persons to receive identity certificates recognising them as "transgender" and therefore, excludes other gender identities. Although it includes terms such as "trans-men", "trans-women", "persons with intersex variations" and "gender-queers" in its definition of transgender persons, these terms are not defined. The bill aims to set up a "National Council for Transgender" that would comprise a host of government and community representatives, and is meant to advise the Union Government on formulation of policies with respect to transgender persons, monitor and evaluate the impact of said policies, coordinate the activities of all departments dealing with these matters and redress the grievances of transgender persons. A controversial clause that would have criminalised begging by transgender people was removed from the bill. Another controversial clause that would have made transgender people subject themselves to certification by a district screening committee to be acknowledged as transgender was also struck out. The legislation received further criticism concerning the issue of sexual assault; it provides for maximum two years' imprisonment for sexually assaulting a transgender person, whereas the minimum penalty for raping a cisgender woman is 10 years. The bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on 5 August 2019 by a voice vote, and by the Rajya Sabha on 25 November 2019. It was signed into law by President Ram Nath Kovind on 5 December, becoming the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.
On 22 April 2019, the Madras High Court, the high court of Tamil Nadu, ruled that the term "bride" under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 includes trans women. Specifically, it directed the authorities to register a marriage between a man and a transgender woman.
The states of Tamil Nadu and Kerala were the first Indian states to introduce a transgender welfare policy. According to the policy, transgender people can access free sex reassignment surgery (SRS) in government hospitals (only for male-to-female), free housing, various citizenship documents, admission in government colleges with full scholarship for higher studies, alternative sources of livelihood through formation of self-help groups (for savings) and initiating income-generation programmes (IGP). Tamil Nadu was also the first state to form a transgender welfare board with representatives from the transgender community. Kerala started providing free surgery in government hospitals in 2016.
The state of West Bengal set up a transgender welfare board in 2015 to coordinate all policy decisions and development work pertaining to the transgender population in the state. The board, however, has been labelled an "all-around failure" by several transgender activists. Supposed to meet once every month with representatives from numerous state government departments, the board has only met five times as of July 2017.
In July 2016, the state of Odisha enacted welfare benefits for transgender people, giving them the same benefits as those living below the poverty line. This was aimed at improving their overall social and economic status, according to the Odisha Department of Social Security.
The Government of Himachal Pradesh has set up medical boards at the district and state level for assisting transgender people. The state has also enacted various schemes providing pension, skill development, scholarship and financial support for parents of transgender people.
A transgender board was established in Chandigarh on 22 August 2017. The board comprises members from the police department, the social welfare department, the education department and the law department, health professionals, and representatives of Panjab University, and others.
In October 2017, the Karnataka Government issued the "State Policy for Transgenders, 2017", with the aim of raising awareness of transgender people within all educational institutions in the state. Educational institutions will address issues of violence, abuse and discrimination against transgender people. It also established a monitoring committee designed with investigating reports of discrimination.
On 28 November 2017, N. Chandrababu Naidu, the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, announced the enactment of pension plans for transgender people. On 16 December 2017, the Andhra Cabinet passed the policy. According to the policy, the State Government will provide an amount of ₹1,500 per month to each transgender person above the age of 18 for social security pensions. The Government will also construct special toilets in public places, such as malls and cinema halls, for transgender people. In addition, the state has also established a transgender welfare board.
In January 2018, the Kashmiri Finance Minister introduced a proposal to the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly that would grant transgender people free life and medical insurance, and a monthly sustenance pension for those aged 60+ and registered with the Social Welfare Department. Transgender activists have criticised aspects of the bill, including its requirement to establish medical boards to issue "transgender certificates".
The Government of Delhi announced its intention in May 2018 to establish a seven-member committee to review issues surrounding the transgender community, including concerns of sexual abuse, discrimination at work as well as other societal problems. "We will have a dedicated cell for transgender people, which will be headed by a representative from the community. The commission receives a lot of complaints of abuse against them. The cell will enable us to focus on issues faced by [transgender people] and providing members greater support and safety.", said Swati Maliwal, chief of the Delhi Commission for Women.
In July 2018, the Rajasthan Transgender Welfare Board (RTWB) announced it would begin issuing "multi-purpose identity cards" to about 75,000 transgender people in the state to help them access government schemes and benefits.
The Uttarakhand High Court directed the State Government in late September 2018 to provide reservation for transgender people in educational institutions, and to frame social welfare programmes for the betterment of transgender people.
In early 2019, the Social Welfare Department of Assam published a draft "transgender policy" with numerous objectives, including providing transgender people access to educational institutions, providing shelter and sanitation for the homeless, raising awareness, and issuing self-identification identity cards. The All Assam Transgender Association has criticised certain aspects of the policy, namely its definition of the term "transgender".
In February 2019, the Maharashtra Government set up a "Transgender Welfare Board" to conduct health programmes and provide formal education and employment opportunities to transgender people. The board provides skill development programmes to help transgender people find a job and free accommodation for those seeking scholarships. A similar board was also set up in the neighbouring state of Gujarat that same month. The Gujarat board provides various welfare programmes for employment and education, and coordinates with state departments to ensure that the transgender community is able to take advantage of government schemes. An educational campaign was also established in order to sensitise the public.
In July 2019, the Bihar Government announced the creation of a transgender welfare board, which would investigate and report on social and legal challenges faced by transgender people in the state and provide financial assistance of up to ₹150,000 for sex reassignment surgery. In addition, those who refuse house on rent or medical facilities to transgender individuals would be eligible for imprisonment ranging between six months to two years.
In August 2019, the state of Madhya Pradesh announced its intention to set up a welfare board for the transgender community in the near future. Issues will include a monthly allowance to parents of intersex children, provisions for job reservations for transgender persons in government and separate public toilets.
Third gender literature and studies
Vaadamalli by novelist Su. Samuthiram is the first Tamil novel about the local aravani community in Tamil Nadu, published in 1994. Transgender activist A. Revathi became the first hijra to write about hijra issues and gender politics in Tamil. Her works have been translated into more than eight languages and act as a primary resource on gender studies in Asia. Her book is part of a research project for more than 100 universities. She is the author of Unarvum Uruvamum ("Feelings and Form"), the first of its kind in English from a member of the hijra community. She also acted and directed several stage plays on gender and sexuality issues in Tamil and Kannada. The Truth about Me: A Hijra Life Story by A. Revathi is part of the syllabus for final year students of The American College in Madurai. The American College is the first college in India to introduce third gender literature and studies with research-oriented seminars. Naan Saravanan's Alla (2007) and Vidya's I Am Vidya (2008) were among early trans woman autobiographies. Kalki Subramaniam's Kuri Aruthean ("Phallus, I cut") is a collection of Tamil poems about transgender lives.
The American College in Madurai also introduced Maraikappatta Pakkangal ("Hidden Pages") as a course book for "Genderqueer and Intersex Human Rights studies" as part of the curriculum for Tamil and English department students in 2018. It is the first book on the LGBT community in the Tamil language, launched by Gopi Shankar Madurai and state BJP leader Vanathi Srinivasan in 2014.
In February 2014, the Indian Psychiatric Society (IPS) issued a statement in which it stated that there is no evidence to prove that homosexuality is unnatural: "Based on existing scientific evidence and good practice guidelines from the field of psychiatry, the Indian Psychiatric Society would like to state that there is no evidence to substantiate the belief that homosexuality is a mental illness or a disease." In June 2018, IPS reiterated its stance on homosexuality saying: "Certain people are not cut out to be heterosexual and we don't need to castigate them, we don't need to punish them, to ostracize them".
Despite this statement from the IPS, conversion therapies are still performed in India. These practices usually involve electroconvulsive therapy (which may lead to memory loss), hypnosis, the administration of nausea-inducing drugs, or more commonly talk therapy where the individual is told that homosexuality is caused by "insufficient male affirmation in childhood" or "an uncaring father and an overbearing mother". Conversion therapy can lead to depression, anxiety, seizures, drug use and suicidal tendencies for the individuals involved.
S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police
On April 28, 2021, Madras High Court Justice N Anand Venkatesh passed interim orders in response to a petition filed by two young women with same sex orientation. In an unprecedented move, he decided to undergo psycho-education before penning a judgment on same sex relationships.
Ignorance is no justification for normalizing any form of discrimination— Justice N Anand Venkatesh, Page number 49 out of 104
Justice N Anand Venkatesh said that psycho-educative counseling on queer issues helped him shed his personal ignorance and prejudices. He clearly stated in the judgment that the responsibility to change, the burden of unlearning stigma, and learning about the lived experience of the LGBT people lies on the society and not the queer individuals.
It was I (us), who has to set off on a journey of understanding them and accepting them and shed our notions, and not they who have to turn themselves inside out to suit our notions of social morality and tradition— Justice N Anand Venkatesh, Page number 50 out of 104
The court recognized that there is an absence of a specific law to protect the interests of queer people and acknowledged it is the responsibility of the constitutional courts to fill this vacuum with necessary directions to ensure the protection of same-sex couples from harassment sourced from stigma and prejudices.
Till the legislature comes up with an enactment, the LGBTQIA+ community cannot be left in a vulnerable atmosphere where there is no guarantee for their protection and safety.— Justice N Anand Venkatesh, Page number 55 out of 104
On 7 June 2021, in delivering the verdict on this case, Justice N Anand Venkatesh prohibited Conversion Therapy. He suggested comprehensive measures to sensitize the society and various branches of the State including the Police and judiciary to remove prejudices against the LGBTQIA+ community. He suggested that changes be made to the curricula of schools and universities to educate students on understanding the LGBTQIA+ community.
However, despite the historic and seminal rulings by the courts, conversion therapy is still practiced and openly advertised in India. Human rights activists claim the regulation is too weak and pseudo-doctors are still doing whatever they want.
There are many avenues for the LGBT community in metro cities for meeting and socialising. These include GayBombay (Mumbai), Good as You (Bangalore), HarmlessHugs (Delhi), Orinam (Chennai), Queerala (Kochi), Queerythm (Thiruvananthapuram), Mobbera (Hyderabad), Queer Nilayam (Hyderabad), Parichay Collective (Bhubaneswar), and Sahodaran (Chennai). Groups focused on LGBT women include ASQ (Bangalore), Labia (Mumbai), Sappho for Equality (Kolkata), Sahayathrika (Thrissur), Chennai Queer Cafe, among others. Trans-specific groups that are focused on support and advocacy include Sampoorna, Tweet Foundation, Telangana Hijra Trans Intersex Samiti, and many others. Recently, a queer dating platform named "Amour Queer Dating" was launched to help LGBT people find long-term partners.
There have been many reports of abuse, harassment and violence over the years directed against LGBT people. In 2003, a hijra was gang-raped in Bangalore, and then gang-raped by the police. Testimonies provided to the Delhi High Court in 2007 documented how a gay man abducted by the police in Delhi was raped by police officials for several days and forced to sign a "confession" saying "I am a gandu [a derogatory term, meaning one who has anal sex]". In 2011, a Haryana lesbian couple was murdered by their nephews for being in an "immoral" relationship. According to reports from activist group Kavi's Humsafar Trust, two-fifths of homosexuals in the country had faced blackmail after the 2013 Supreme Court ruling. Suicide attempts are common. In early 2018, a lesbian couple committed suicide and left a note reading: "We have left this world to live with each other. The world did not allow us to stay together."
In February 2017, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare unveiled resource material relating to health issues to be used as a part of a nationwide adolescent peer-education plan called Saathiya. Among other subjects, the material discusses homosexuality. The material states, "Yes, adolescents frequently fall in love. They can feel attraction for a friend or any individual of the same or opposite sex. It is normal to have special feelings for someone. It is important for adolescents to understand that such relationships are based on mutual consent, trust, transparency and respect. It is alright to talk about such feelings to the person for whom you have them but always in a respectful manner."
In 2017, Delhi held its tenth pride parade, attended by hundreds of people. Chennai has held pride parades since 2009, while Goa held its first pride parade in October 2017. Bhubaneswar organised its first in September 2018, and Guwahati held its first pride event in February 2014. The first such event in Sikkim was held in January 2019 in the city of Gangtok.
On 17 May 2018, the International Day Against Homophobia, activities were held throughout the country, including in Bhopal, Delhi, Mumbai, Kolhapur, Thiruvananthapuram and Lucknow. Numerous foreign embassies (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Costa Rica, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States) expressed support for LGBT rights in India, and reaffirmed their countries' commitment to promote human rights.
According to a 2018 survey, a third of Indian gay men were married to women who were unaware that they are secretly gay.
The All India Hijra Kalyan Sabha fought for over a decade to get voting rights, which they finally got in 1994. In 1996, Kali stood for office in Patna under the then Judicial Reform Party. Munni ran in the elections as well for South Mumbai that year. They both lost.
After the defeat of Kali and Munni, three years later, Kamla Jaan was elected Mayor of Katni. Shabnam Mausi was elected to the Legislative Assembly of Madhya Pradesh in 1998. Over the next few years, multiple other transgender candidates won office. These include Heera who won a seat on the City Council of Jabalpur and Gulshan who was elected to the City Council in Bina Etawa. In December 2000, Asha Devi became the Mayor of Gorakhpur, and Kallu Kinnar was elected to the City Council in Varanasi.
Shabnam Mausi is the first transgender Indian to be elected to public office. She was an elected member of the Madhya Pradesh State Legislative Assembly from 1998 to 2003. In 2003, hijras in Madhya Pradesh announced the establishment of their own political party called "Jeeti Jitayi Politics" (JJP; Hindi: जीती जिताई पालिटिक्स), which literally means "politics that has already been won". The party also released an eight-page election manifesto which it claims outlines why it is different from mainstream political parties.
In the 2011 assembly elections in Tamil Nadu, transgender activist Kalki Subramaniam unsuccessfully challenged a DMK ticket. In March 2014, Kalki announced in Puducherry that she would contest a seat in an election in the Villupuram constituency in neighbouring Tamil Nadu.
On 5 November 2015, K. Prithika Yashini became the first out transgender police officer in the state of Tamil Nadu. At the time, the Tamil Nadu police had three transgender constables, but Yashini became the first transgender person to hold the rank of officer in the state. Transgender men are an integral part of the police force in many states of India. Many of them remain in the women police force and fear changing their legal name and gender as this could pose a risk to their employment.
On 12 February 2017, two transgender people were appointed by the Kolhapur District Legal Services Authority (KDLSA) as panel members for the local Lok Adalat (People's Court). 30 panels were appointed to settle general local disputes that arise within the community. Members of the KDLSA have stated this appointment was their "main achievement."
In July 2017, Joyita Mondal was appointed to the Islampur Lok Adalat, becoming West Bengal's first transgender judge. In 2018, Swati Bidham Baruah became the first transgender judge in Assam. Swati, founder of the All Assam Transgender Association, was appointed to the Guwahati Lok Adalat.
Transgender representation was particularly noticeable in the Lok Sabha elections of 2019, with many candidates running in Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Kerala, Maharashtra, Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh. Most major parties mentioned LGBT rights in their election manifestos. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) ran on a platform of greater rights for the transgender community, adding that it "will ensure self-employment and skill development avenues for transgender youth." The Indian National Congress' manifesto states that the party "recognises the sexual diversity among people and promises equality and equal protection of the laws to people with different sexual orientations and gender identities", specifically advocating for a transgender bill drafted in consultation with LGBT groups and gender sensitivity training in all government departments.
Intersex issues in India may often be perceived as third gender issues. The most well-known third gender groups in India are the hijras. After interviewing and studying hijras for many years, Serena Nanda writes in her book, Neither Man Nor Woman: The hijras of India, as follows: "There is a widespread belief in India that hijras are born Third Genders [intersex] and are taken away by the hijra community at birth or in childhood, but I found no evidence to support this belief among the hijras I met, all of whom joined the community voluntarily, often in their teens." Sangam literature uses the word pedi to refer to people born intersex, but the indigenous gender minorities in India were clear about intersex people and referred to them as mabedi usili and gave a distinct identity to denote them.
Physical integrity and bodily autonomy
Intersex persons are not protected from violations to physical integrity and bodily autonomy.
Cases of infanticide have been reported involving infants with obvious intersex conditions at birth, along with a failure to thrive by infants assigned female. Medical reports suggest that parents in India prefer to assign infants with intersex conditions as male, with surgical interventions taking place when parents can afford them.
In a reply to a letter from an intersex rights activist Gopi Shankar Madurai, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare replied that "Any kind of invasive medical procedure including sex reassignment operations are done only after thorough assessment of the patient, obtaining justification for the procedure planned to be conducted with the help of appropriate diagnostic test and only after taking a written consent of the patient/guardian".
On 22 April 2019, the Madras High Court issued a landmark judgment in which it upheld the marriage rights of transgender women, and directed the state of Tamil Nadu to ban sex-selective surgeries on intersex infants. Based on the works of intersex activist Gopi Shankar, the Court took note of the rampant practice of compulsory medical interventions performed on intersex infants and children. The court further cited examples from Hindu mythology in its ruling, namely the story of Iravan.
Protection from discrimination
Multiple Indian athletes have been subjected to humiliation, discrimination and loss of work and medals following sex verification. Middle-distance runner Santhi Soundarajan, who won the silver medal in 800 m at the 2006 Asian Games in Doha, Qatar, was stripped of her medal, and later attempted suicide. Track athlete Pinki Pramanik was accused by a female roommate of rape and later charged, gender tested and declared male, though she and other medical experts dispute these claims. Indian athlete Dutee Chand won a case against the IAAF in 2015, enabling women athletes with high testosterone levels to compete as women, on the basis that there is no clear evidence of performance benefits. In 2016, some sports clinicians stated: "One of the fundamental recommendations published almost 25 years ago ... that athletes born with a disorder of sex development and raised as females be allowed to compete as women remains appropriate".
Intersex people in Indian politics
Gopi Shankar Madurai was one of the youngest, and the first openly intersex and genderqueer, candidate to run in an Indian election, contesting a seat in the 2016 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election.
The data on public opinion on LGBT rights is limited in India. One of the recent study was conducted by the multinational research firm Ipsos between April 23 and May 7, 2021. They released a report titled "LGBT+ Pride 2021 Global Survey". Indian participants to survey were selected and polled online.[lower-alpha 1]
Acceptance toward LGBT people is reportedly far higher in top universities, such as IIT, IISc, DU and IIM. According to a poll conducted at IIT Delhi in 2015, 72% of respondents agreed that "being homosexual is normal as being heterosexual". Many institutes have their own LGBT clubs, namely Saathi at IIT Bombay, Indradhanu at IIT Delhi, Ambar at IIT Kharagpur, Unmukt at IIT Kanpur, Satrangi at IISER Pune, Anchor at BITS Pilani, HCQC at Hindu College and more. Another survey in 2019 revealed that over 69% of Indians want same-sex marriages to be legalised.
Visibility and exposure
According to Ipsos' online LGBT+ Pride 2021 Global Survey, 59% of the surveyed Indians support LGBT people being open about their sexual orientation or gender identity with everyone, 39% support LGBT people displaying affection in public (e.g., kissing or holding hands), 56% support openly lesbian, gay and bisexual athletes in sports teams, 55% support more LGBT characters on TV, in films and in advertising. The same survey found that 17% of the Indians have a relative, friend or colleague who is homosexual (Including Gay and Lesbian), 21% have a relative, friend or colleague who is bisexual, 10% have a relative, friend or colleague who is transgender, 12% have a relative, friend or colleague who is non-binary, non-conforming or gender-fluid.
According to a 2017 poll carried out by ILGA, 58% of Indians agreed that gay, lesbian and bisexual people should have the same rights as straight people, while 30% disagreed. The poll reported that 59% agreed that they should be protected from workplace discrimination. The poll reported that 39% of Indians said that people who are in same-sex relationships should be charged as criminals, while a plurality of 44% disagreed. As for transgender people, 66% agreed that they should have the same rights, 62% believed they should be protected from employment discrimination and 60% believed they should be allowed to change their legal gender.
According to Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2021 Global Survey, 53% of Indians support laws banning discrimination against LGBT people when it comes to employment, access to education, housing and social services, etc. 58% of the Indians support companies and brands actively promoting equality for LGBT people and 53% support transgender athletes competing based on the gender they identify with rather the sex they were assigned at birth.
According to Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2021 Global Survey, 44% of Indian people were in favor of legalising same-sex marriage, 14% of Indians were in support of allowing some kind of legal recognition for same-sex couples with 18% opposed and 25% chose not to give their opinion. Furthemore, the survery found that 56% of Indians' current views on same-sex marriage are different than they were five years ago.
According to a 2016 poll by the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, 35% of Indian people were in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage, with a further 35% opposed. A survey by the Varkey Foundation conducted between September and October 2016, found that support for same-sex marriage was higher among 18-21 year olds at 53%.
According to Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2021 Global Survey, 66% of Indians believed that same-sex couples should have the same adoption rights as opposite sex couples, 21% disagreed and 13% were unsure. Similarly, 59% of Indians think that the same-sex couples are just as likely as other parents to successfully raise children, 26% disagreed, and 16% were unsure.
The supportive actions of the larger public for the LGBT rights has been documented in the recent study conducted online by the multinational research firm Ipsos between April 23 and May 7, 2021. They released report titled "LGBT+ Pride 2021 Global Survey".[lower-alpha 2]
According to Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2021 Global Survey, 18% of Indians have attended same-sex wedding, 19% visited a bar or night club that primarily caters to LGBT people, and 30% has spoken against someone who was being prejudiced against LGBT people.
LGBT rights activists from India: This category is for people who have specifically been involved in activism around LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) issues. It should not include LGBT people who have been prominent in other areas of activism. Notable persons like Anjali Gopalan, Shrushti Chavan, Shravani Chavan and Celina Jaitly who are not LGBT persons but their efforts made the Indian Government to decriminalize IPC 377 on 6 September 2018.
|Dutee Chand||India's first openly gay athlete|
|Menaka Guruswamy||Senior Advocate at the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India|
|Arundhati Katju||Lawyer and litigator|
|Saurabh Kirpal||Indian lawyer, writer and author|
|Navtej Singh Johar||Bharatnatyam dancer and a recipient of Sangeet Natak Akademi Award|
|Keshav Suri||Entrepreneur and executive director of The Lalit Suri Hospitality Group|
|Ritu Dalmia||Celebrity chef and restaurateur|
|Manabi Bandyopadhyay||India's first openly transgender college principal and first transgender person to hold a PhD|
|Shabnam Mausi||First openly transgender person to participate in Indian elections. First transgender member of any state legislative assembly.|
|Narthaki Nataraj||First transgender woman to receive the Sangeet Natak Akademi Award and the first transgender woman to be awarded Padma Shri - India's fourth-highest civilian award|
|Manjamma Jogathi||Indian theatre artist and a recipient of Padma Shri - India's fourth-highest civilian award|
|Priyakanta Laishram||Openly queer Manipuri filmmaker, actor, screenwriter, film producer and film editor.|
|Sushant Divgikar||Mr. Gay India 2014|
|Divesh Tolani and Atulan Purohit||YouTuber and Instagram influencers|
|Pritam Borthakur and Manish Bhowmick (Vagabondboiz)||YouTuber and Instagram influencers|
|Anjali Gopalan||Human rights activist|
|Benjamin Daimary||First openly gay actor to win National award|
|Harish Iyer||Activist, columnist and blogger|
|Vikram Seth||Writer, novelist and poet, winner of the Makwan Prize 2017|
|Karan Johar||Indian openly gay film producer|
|Abhijit Iyer Mitra||Defense Economics specialist and Political analyst|
|Gopi Shankar Madurai||Intersex and Genderqueer politician, recipient of the Commonwealth Award and founder of Srishti Madurai|
|Manvendra Singh Gohil||Titular Prince of Rajpipla|
|Laxmi Narayan Tripathi||Transgender activist|
|S. Swapna||First transgender Gazetted Officer in India, Assistant Commissioner of the Commercial Tax Department in Tamil Nadu|
|Aishwarya Rutuparna Pradhan||First openly transgender civil servant and Odisha Financial Services officer|
|Rituparno Ghosh||Popular filmmaker, winner of 11 Indian National Film Awards|
|Tista Das||Transgender activist|
|Ruth Vanita||Writer and academician|
|Bobby Darling||Transgender actress and vocal supporter of LGBT rights|
|Pablo Ganguli||Cultural entrepreneur, artist, director and impresario|
|Firdaus Kanga||Writer and actor|
|Andrew Harvey||Author, religious scholar and teacher of mystic traditions|
|Karpaga||First transgender person in India to perform a leading role in a mainstream movie|
|Leena Manimekalai||Poet, writer and film maker|
|Hoshang Merchant||Teacher, poet and critic|
|Ismail Merchant||Film producer and director|
|Onir||Award-winning film director|
|Jyoti Puri||Leading Indian feminist sociologist. Author of the distinguished book Sexual States: Governance and the Struggle Against the Antisodomy Law in India's Present.|
|Sridhar Rangayan||Filmmaker, and founder and festival director of Kasish Mumbai International Queer Film Festival|
|R. Raj Rao||Writer and professor of literature|
|A. Revathi||Actor, artist, writer and theater activist|
|Wendell Rodricks||Fashion designer and choreographer|
|Ashok Row Kavi||Founder of Humsafur Trust and LGBT activist|
|Shaneel Lal||Activist, model and writer|
|Parvez Sharma||Writer and documentary filmmaker|
|Ramchandra Siras||Linguist and author|
|Living Smile Vidya||Actor, artist, writer, and theater activist|
|Kalki Subramaniam||Transgender activist, actor, artist, writer and founder of Sahodari Foundation|
|Manil Suri||Indian-American mathematician and writer|
|Akkai Padmashali||Transgender activist|
|Rose Venkatesan||First transgender TV host in India|
|Riyad Vinci Wadia||Filmmaker|
|Aryan Pasha||India's first trans man to win a prize at a body building contest|
|Same-sex sexual activity|
|Same-sex sexual activity legal||Since 2018 (Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India)|
|Equal age of consent (18)||Since 2018|
|Discrimination protections regarding sexual orientation|
|Anti-discrimination laws in employment|||
|Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services|||
|Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (indirect discrimination and other acts of discrimination)||/|
|Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships|
|Same-sex marriages||Court decision pending; One same-sex marriage recognised on 22 July 2011|
|Recognition of same-gender couples||Since 2020, limited cohabitation rights granted by some courts |
|Adoption and family planning|
|Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples||Court decision pending|
|Adoption by LGBTQ+ individuals|
|Joint adoption by same-sex couples||Court decision pending|
|International joint adoption by same-sex couples||Court decision pending|
|Access to In vitro fertilization for lesbians||Since 2018|
|Commercial surrogacy for LGBTQ+ individuals/ couples||Commercial surrogacy prohibited regardless of sexual orientation|
|Altruistic surrogacy for LGBTQ+ individuals/ couples||Court decision pending|
|Automatic parenthood on birth certificates for children of same-sex couples||Proposed|
|Right to change legal gender||Since 2014; Medical intervention required |
|Coverage for sex reassignment surgery||Since 2022|
|Intersex minors protected from invasive surgical procedures||/||Banned only in the state of Tamil Nadu; pending in Delhi|
|Third gender option||Since 2014|
|Anti-discrimination laws covering gender identity and gender expression in all aspects.||Since 2019|
|Trans women protected under Domestic Violence Act||Since 2023|
|Homosexuality declassified as an illness||Never classified as illnesses by the Indian Psychiatric Society|
|Transgenderism declassified as an illness|
|LGBTQ+ individuals allowed to serve openly in the military||Court decision pending|
|Conversion therapy banned||/||Medical professionals are barred from practicing conversion therapy. However, it is still widely practiced due to absence of a law.|
|MSMs allowed to donate blood||Court decision pending|
Summary of Transgender Reservation
|States||Reservation in Government Employment||Reservation in Government Colleges/Universities||Transgenders allowed to serve as Indian police officers|
|Andhra Pradesh||(Court decision pending)||(Court decision pending)||(Court decision pending)|
|Assam||(Court decision pending)|
|Karnataka||(Since 2022)||(Since 2022)|
|Kerala||(Court decision pending)||(Since 2018)||(Pending)|
|Maharashtra||(Court decision pending)||(Court decision pending)||(Since 2023)|
|Rajasthan||(Court decision pending)||(Court decision pending)||(Since 2017)|
|Tamil Nadu||(Under MBC reservation)||(Under MBC reservation)||(Since 2017)|
|West Bengal||(Court decision pending)|
- The report noted that participants of online surveys from India "tend to be more urban, educated, and/or affluent than the general population."
- The report noted that participants of online surveys from India "tend to be more urban, educated, and/or affluent than the general population."
- Human rights in India
- LGBT rights in Asia
- LGBT culture in India
- National Council for Transgender Persons
- "Can't marry, but same sex couples have right to live together: Uttarakhand High Court". Theprint.in. 19 June 2020.
- "Guide on the Rights of Transgender Persons in India". Nyaaya. Retrieved 16 November 2022.
- Vakoch, Douglas A., ed. (2022). Transgender India: Understanding Third Gender Identities and Experiences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96386-6. ISBN 978-3-030-96385-9. S2CID 213383859.
- Abraham, Rohan (30 November 2017). "All you need to know about the Transgender Persons Bill, 2016". The Hindu.
- "India: Prosecute Rampant 'Honor' Killings". Human Rights Watch. 18 July 2010.
- Patel, Rashmi (27 August 2016). "Being LGBT in India: Some home truths". Livemint.com.
- "Politics and Society Between Elections" (PDF). Regional Political Democracy. 2 - Social Identity: 88–92. 2019.
- "Hundreds of gay rights activists join pride march in Delhi". ABC. 12 November 2017. Archived from the original on 12 November 2017. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Mathur, Tasha (6 March 2018). "Tritiya Prakriti: the hidden third gender in Hinduism". Pink News. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 6 June 2023.
- "Homosexuality, Hinduism & the Third Gender (A Summary)". Galva108.org. 15 May 2014.
- Wilhelm, Amara Das (9 June 2021). "Vaishnavism and homosexuality". New Statesman.
- Das Wilhelm, Amara (2010). Tritiya-Prakriti: People of the Third Sex: Understanding Homosexuality, Transgender Identity and Intersex Conditions Through Hinduism (Abridged Version). Xlibris Corporation. p. 48. ISBN 9781453503164.
The shandha is produced according to previous life impressions and an equal "seed" conception caused when the parents assume purushayita or "woman on top" position during intercourse.
- Penrose, Walter (January 2001). "Hidden in History: Female Homoeroticism and Women of a "Third Nature" in the South Asian Past". Journal of the History of Sexuality. University of Texas Press. 10 (1): 3–39. doi:10.1353/sex.2001.0018. JSTOR 3704787. S2CID 142955490.
- "Homosexuality in ancient India: 10 instances". India Today. 10 July 2018. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- Kugle, Scott A (1 September 2011). Sufis and Saints' Bodies: Mysticism, Corporeality, and Sacred Power in Islam. Univ of North Carolina Press. p. 309 Note 62-63. ISBN 9780807872772. Retrieved 20 September 2017.
- Baillier, Neil B. E. (1875). "A digest of the Moohummudan law". pp. 1–3. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "How did the Mughals view homosexuality?". History Stack Exchange.
- Khalid, Haroon (17 June 2016). "From Bulleh Shah and Shah Hussain to Amir Khusro, same-sex references abound in Islamic poetry". Scroll.in. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- "Sarmad Kashani Tomb in Jami Masjid, New Delhi, India - Archive - Diarna.org". Archive.diarna.org.
- V. N. Datta (27 November 2012), Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Sarman, ISBN 9788129126627,
Walderman Hansen doubts whether sensual passions played any part in their love [sic]; puri doubts about their homosexual relationship
- "Of Genizahs, Sufi Jewish Saints, and Forgotten Corners of History - UW Stroum Center for Jewish Studies". Jewishstudies.washington.edu. 1 March 2016.
- "India decriminalises gay sex in landmark verdict". Aljazeera.com. 6 September 2018.
- "Xavier was aware of the brutality of the Inquisition". Deccan Herald. 27 April 2010. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
- Sharma, Jai (9 April 2015). "The Portuguese Inquisition in Goa: A brief history". Indiafacts.org. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
- Soyer, Francois (2012). Ambiguous Gender in Early Modern Spain and Portugal: Inquisitors, Doctors and the Transgression of Gender Norms. p. 45. ISBN 9789004225299. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
- Nagar, Ila; DasGupta, Debanuj (December 2015). "Public koti and private love: Section 377, religion, perversity and lived desire". Contemporary South Asia. 23 (4): 426. doi:10.1080/09584935.2015.1056092. S2CID 147176959.
- Sathyanarayana Rao, T. S.; Jacob, K S (2014). "The reversal on Gay Rights in India". Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 56 (1): 1–2. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.124706. ISSN 0019-5545. PMC 3927237. PMID 24574551.
- Suresh, Mayur (6 September 2018). "This is the start of a new era for India's LGBT communities | Mayur Suresh". The Guardian.
- Nussbaum, Martha (2016). "Disgust or Equality? Sexual Orientation and Indian Law" (PDF). Journal of Indian Law and Society.
- "India: The Indian Penal Code". Wipo.int.
- Kusum Ingots v. Union of India, (2004) 6 SCC 254: "An order passed on a writ petition questioning the constitutionality of a Parliamentary Act, whether interim or final, keeping in view the provisions contained in Clause (2) of Article 226 of the Constitution of India, will have effect throughout the territory of India subject of course to the applicability of the Act."
- Pervez Iqbal Siddiqui (28 December 2010). "Crackdown on gay party in Saharanpur, 13 held". The Times of India. Retrieved 20 January 2011.
- Mahapatra, Dhananjay (23 February 2012). "Centre opposes decriminalisation of homosexuality in SC". Economic Times. Times Internet. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
- "Supreme Court pulls up Centre for flip-flop on homosexuality". The Indian Express. 28 February 2012. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
- "Chennai's LGBTQIA+ community is coming out in order to take down Section 377". Edex Live. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
- "Indian Coming Out Day". DNA India. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
- "First LGBTQIA cultural festival in Ahmedabad on July 2". The Times of India. 12 June 2022. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
- "Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court judgment in Naz Foundation; Declares S.377 to be constitutional". Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- Nelson, Dean (11 December 2013). "India's top court upholds law criminalising gay sex". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- "Supreme Court makes gay sex punishable offence, again; Twitter war breaks out between those for and against the verdict". DNA India. 11 December 2013. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- Mahapatra, Dhananjay (12 December 2013). "Supreme Court makes homosexuality a crime again". The Times Of India.
- "Sc Verdict on Article 377 - Homosexuality - Virtue". Scribd.com.
- IANS (11 December 2013). "Apex court ruling disappointing: rights body". Business Standard India. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
- Harmit Shah Singh (11 December 2013). "India's Supreme Court declares homosexual sex illegal". CNN.
- "Naz Foundation to file review petition against SC order on section 377". DNA India. 11 December 2013.
- "Supreme Court refuses overruling its Verdict on Section 377 and Homosexuality". IANS. Biharprabha News. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- J Venkatesan (11 December 2013). "Supreme Court sets aside Delhi HC verdict decriminalising gay sex". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 12 December 2013.
- "India parliament blocks MP's bill to decriminalize gay sex". Rappler.com. 18 December 2015.
- Sharma, Ashok (2 February 2016). "India's Top Court to Re-Examine Gay Rights". ABC News. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Ganguly, Meenakshi (24 August 2017). "India's Supreme Court Upholds Right to Privacy". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "India's supreme court could be about to decriminalise gay sex in major victory for LGBT rights". independent.co.uk. 8 January 2018.
- "Six New Petitioners In SC Seeking Scrapping Of Section 377IPC: Hearing On Tuesday". Live Law. 27 April 2018.
- "SC Seeks Govt's Reply on IITians' Petition Scrapping Homosexuality". Thequint. 14 May 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "India on brink of biggest gay rights victory as Supreme Court prepares to rule on gay sex ban". Independent.co.uk. 14 July 2018.
- Dhruv, Rushabh (5 July 2018). "Just In: Supreme Court to start hearing section 377 case from July 10". In.com. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018.
- "SC to hear petition against Section 377 next week". Aninews.in. Asian News International. 6 July 2018.
- "Section 377: SC reserves order, verdict on constitutional validity likely before October". Paperdabba. 17 July 2018. Archived from the original on 17 July 2018. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
- Mahapatra, Dhananjay; Choudhary, Amit Anand (7 September 2018). "SC decriminalises Section 377, calls 2013 ruling 'arbitrary and retrograde'". The Times of India.
- "NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR v. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE SECRETARY.  INSC 746 (6 September 2018)". Legal Information Institute of India. Retrieved 1 April 2020.
- "Section 377 verdict: Here are the highlights". The Indian Express. 6 September 2018.
- "India court legalises gay sex in landmark ruling". BBC News. 6 September 2018.
- Misra, Dipak. "Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law and Justice" (PDF). The Hindu. p. 160. Retrieved 6 September 2018.
- "India's top court decriminalizes gay sex in landmark ruling". CNN. 6 September 2018.
- "Supreme Court decriminalises Section 377: All you need to know". The Times of India. 6 September 2018.
- "Indian supreme court decriminalises homosexuality". The Guardian. 6 September 2018.
- Rajagopal, Krishnadas (10 September 2018). "377 verdict has inbuilt firewall". The Hindu.
- Das, Shaswati (7 September 2018). "Historic verdict holds hope for same-sex marriages, adoption". Livemint.com.
- Singh, Dalip; Rautray, Samanwaya (10 September 2018). "High Court's 1995 ruling offers hope to Jammu and Kashmir's LGBT community". The Economic Times.
- "J&K reorganised into UTs of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh: Security under Centre's ambit; state constitution, Ranbir Penal Code abolished". First Post. 31 October 2019.
- "'Queerphobia' rampant in medical education, need revamp, says Madras high court". Hindustan Times. 2 September 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
- Sajeev, Upasana (10 April 2022). "Madras High Court Directs Sensitization Of School Teachers On LGBTQIA+ Students Issues". Livelaw.in. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
- Suresh Kumar (28 December 2021). "Madras Hc Proposes Media Glossary For Lgbtq+ Community | Chennai News - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
- Jain, Rupam; Chaturvedi, Arpan (11 January 2023). "Leader of influential Hindu group backs LGBT rights in India". Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
- "In a first, Gurgaon court recognizes lesbian marriage - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 31 January 2017.
- "In a first, Gurgaon court recognizes lesbian marriage - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 31 January 2017.
- "Lesbian couple's parents accept their relationship - The Times of India". The Times Of India. 17 August 2011.
- Nelson, Dean (26 July 2011). "India's first married lesbian couple given 24-hour protection". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.
- Mandhani, Apoorva (19 June 2020). "Can't marry, but same sex couples have right to live together: Uttarakhand High Court". ThePrint. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Schmall, Emily; Kumar, Hari (30 August 2022). "India's Supreme Court Widens Definition of 'Family'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 November 2022.
- "SC seeks Centre's response on legalising same-sex marriages". Retrieved 26 November 2022.
- "Delhi HC To Hear Pleas Seeking Recognition Of Same-Sex Marriages On April 24". Outlook India. 6 December 2022. Retrieved 6 December 2022.
- "Delhi HC to hear pleas seeking recognition of same-sex marriages on April 24". 6 December 2022. Retrieved 6 December 2022.
- "How India's Supreme Court Could Make Same-Sex Marriage Legal". 18 January 2023.
- "Same-sex marriage will cause havoc: Sushil Modi objects to legalising gay marriages".
- Tiwary, Deeptiman (14 March 2023). "RSS backs govt stand on same-sex marriage, says 'in Hindu philosophy, marriage a sanskar'". The Indian Express. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
- "'Bharatiya marriage traditions' threatened by legalisation of same-sex marriage, former high court judges claim in public statement – the Leaflet". 31 March 2023.
- ""Legalising same-sex marriage will have devastating impact on society": Former HC Judges in an open letter".
- "Court shouldn't interfere on same-sex marriage law, let Parliament decide: Former judge".
- Jamaat-e-Islami Hind opposes same-sex marriages (Press Release), Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, 15 March 2023, archived from the original on 15 March 2023
- Shamsi, Mohammed Safi (15 March 2023). "AIMPLB backs Centre's stance against same-sex marriage". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 16 March 2023.
- Parab-Pandit, Shefali (16 March 2023). "Mumbai: Religious leaders decry same-sex unison". The Free Press Journal. Archived from the original on 16 March 2023.
- "Supreme Court: India court hears historic same sex marriage case". BBC News. 17 April 2023. Retrieved 18 April 2023.
- "Centre's multiple attempts to delay hearing on same-sex marriages". India Today.
- https://www.vibesofindia.com/centre-questions-scs-rights-in-adjudicating-over-same-sex-marriages/ Archived 20 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine [bare URL]
- https://www.s/freepresskashmir.news/2023/04/18/same-sex-marriage-only-parliament-can-decide-on-it-says-goi/amp/[permanent dead link] [bare URL]
- https://www./s/www.news18.com/amp/videos/india/cji-chandrachud-faces-backlash-for-notion-of-man-woman-not-absolute-based-on-genitals-news18-7589077.html [bare URL]
- "Same-sex marriage: SC hints at expanding ambit of Special Marriage Act, says 'society and law have evolved'". The Economic Times. 20 April 2023. Retrieved 11 May 2023.
- "Five-judge bench led by CJI to hear pleas seeking recognition of same-sex marriage".
- "Parliament, not courts, best place to debate same-sex marriage, India minister says". Reuters. 21 April 2023. Retrieved 11 May 2023.
- "Parliament, not courts, best place to debate same-sex marriage, India minister says | Taiwan News | 2023-04-21 21:00:00". Taiwan News. 21 April 2023. Retrieved 11 May 2023.
- "How does India perceive homosexuality? – DW – 04/18/2023". dw.com. Retrieved 11 May 2023.
- "Assam, Andhra and Rajasthan opposed legalising same-sex marriage: Centre tells SC". 10 May 2023.
- Chishti, Seema (18 October 2017). "Drafting change: What the new 'progressive' intervention in Uniform Civil Code debate entails". The Indian Express.
- "A new UCC for a new India? Progressive draft UCC allows for same sex marriages". Catchnews. Retrieved 12 October 2017.
- "NCP's Supriya Sule brings Bill to legalise same-sex marriage". The Indian Express. 2 April 2022. Retrieved 2 April 2022.
- "Article 15 in The Constitution Of India 1949". indiankanoon.org.
- "Judgment" (PDF). Supreme Court of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 May 2014. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "Allahabad HC reinstated the home guard who was sacked for being gay". newsd. 10 February 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Mishra, Abhishek (10 February 2021). "Homosexuality not a ground to sack employee, rules Allahabad High Court". India Today. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "THE INDIAN PENAL CODE" (PDF). Retrieved 5 July 2021.
- "Kamaal R Khan booked for passing 'vulgar' remarks against the LGBTQ community - Times of India ►". The Times of India. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
- "NHRC sets up LGBTI Core Group, ropes in activist Harish Iyer". 14 August 2018.
- "Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019" (PDF). socialjustice.nic.in. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
- Nath, Damini (11 January 2020). "Transgender Persons Act comes into effect". The Hindu. Chennai: N. Ravi. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- Pathak, Sushmita (4 December 2019). "India Just Passed A Trans Rights Bill. Why Are Trans Activists Protesting It?". npr. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- "UGC Regulation on Curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions (Third Amendment), 2016" (PDF). Ugc.ac.in. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- Dutta, Amrita (7 September 2018). "Indian Army is worried now that men can legally have sex with other men". The Print.
- "Parliament winter session: Bills seek ban on non-veg food at official events, rights to LGBT to serve in armed forces". The New Indian Express. 28 December 2018.
- "Kamaal R Khan booked for passing 'vulgar' remarks against the LGBTQ community". 12 September 2018.
- "Dogri translation of हिजड़ा". Khandbahale.com.
- Thakur, Gajendra, Videha English-maithili Dictionary. page 306
- Dacho Furtad, Konkani-English dictionary. Asian Educational Services, 1999
- Sinha, Chandrani (2 March 2017). "Manipur Elections 2017: Why is the transgender community of the state backing Irom Sharmila". InUth.
- Grierson, George Abraham (1932). "A dictionary of the Kashmiri language". Digital Dictionaries of South Asia. Archived from the original on 26 June 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2018.
- Bronson, Miles (1867). A dictionary in Assamese and English. Sibsagor, American Baptist mission press. p. 311.
- A Santali-English dictionary (in ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ). Santal Mission Press. 1899. p. 86.
- Shackle, Samira. "Politicians of the third gender: the "shemale" candidates of Pakistan". New Statesman. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- "Crystallising Queer Politics-The Naz Foundation Case and Its Implications For India's Transgender Communities" (PDF). NUJS Law Review. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
- "Supreme Court's Third Gender Status to Transgenders is a landmark". IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
- "The Position of India's Transgender - Third Gender". legalserviceindia.com. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
- Mallick, Lelin (4 November 2017). "State's first transgender passport". The Telegraph.
- "Transgenders protest demanding name change in certificates". The Times Of India. 29 April 2014. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "Transgenders stage protest at collectorate". The Times of India. 8 October 2013. Archived from the original on 16 October 2013.
- "Transgender Clears TNPSC Group IV Exam". The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 1 April 2014.
- "Rajya Sabha passes historic private bill to promote transgender rights". The Indian Express. 25 April 2015.
- "Bills on transgenders, disabled in monsoon session: Gehlot". Archived from the original on 30 September 2017. Retrieved 11 June 2015.
- "Centre's Transgender Bill ridiculous, laments activist Akkai Padmashali". Deccanchronicle.com. 21 November 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
- "Lok Sabha passes transgender rights Bill". India Today. 17 December 2018.
- "Transgender rights bill might be reintroduced this Parliament session, say MPs". Hindustan Times. New Delhi. 22 June 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Glauert, Rik (6 June 2019). "Controversial transgender bill to be reintroduced to India's parliament". Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 30 July 2019. Retrieved 16 July 2019.
- "Cabinet approves transgender bill". Indian Express. New Delhi. 11 July 2019.
- "Union Cabinet approves Transgender Rights Bill". India Today. New Delhi. 10 July 2019.
- "Begging by transgender community no more a crime; Bill amended". My Nation. 15 July 2019.
- Reddy, Apsara (14 July 2019). "The transgender bill must focus on equity and dignity". Hindustan Times.
- "Provision that criminalised beggary by transgender people from bill". India Today. New Delhi. 14 July 2019.
- "Lok Sabha passes Transgender persons protection of rights bill". Moneycontrol. 5 August 2019.
- "Lok Sabha passes transgender protection Bill". The Hindu. 5 August 2019.
- Lalwani, Vijayta (27 November 2019). "What next for transgender people, as India clears a bill that activists call "murder of gender justice"?". QuartzIndia.
- Sebastian, Manu (23 April 2019). ""Transwoman A 'Bride' Under Hindu Marriage Act": Madras HC; Also Bans Sex Re-Assignment Surgeries On Intersex Children [Read Judgment]". Live Law. Archived from the original on 23 April 2019. Retrieved 6 June 2023.
- ""Ban sex reassignment surgeries on intersex infants Madras High Court tells Tamil Nadu Govt" - The News Minute". 23 April 2019. Retrieved 24 April 2019.
- "Ruling on intersex infants: Madurai activist comes in for praise by High Court". The Times of India. 24 April 2019. Retrieved 24 April 2019.
- Karthikeyan, Divya (25 May 2017). "Tamil Nadu, once a pioneering state for welfare of transgenders, now shuns the third gender". Firspost.
- Devasia, TK (19 March 2016). "Why Kerala's free sex-change surgeries will offer a new lifeline for the transgender community". Scroll.in. Retrieved 19 March 2016.
- "How Kerala left the country behind on transgender rights". dna. 14 November 2015. Retrieved 19 March 2016.
- "The Transgender Welfare Development Board, West Bengal – A Wasted Potential". Centre for Law & Policy Research. 13 April 2017.
- Sumanta Ray Chaudhuri (4 July 2017). "Bengal's Transgender Development Board All-Around Failure, Alleges Member". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Dash, Jatindra (2 June 2016). "Odisha becomes first state to give welfare to transgender community". Reuters.
- "Himachal Pradesh to bring transgenders under social security net". The Indian Express. 7 September 2016.
- "Welfare of Transgender". himachal.nic.in.
- Sharma, Kuheena (6 April 2017). "Sanitation ministry allows transgender people use public toilets, wants them recognised as equal citizens". India Today. New Delhi. Retrieved 2 November 2017.
- "Chandigarh gets its first Transgender Welfare Board with 14 members". Indian Express. 30 August 2017.
- "Transgender policy cleared by Karnataka cabinet". The Indian Express. Press Trust of India. 27 October 2017.
- ANI (28 November 2017). "CM Naidu announces pension scheme for state's transgenders". ABP Live. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- Apparasu, Srinivasa Rao (17 December 2017). "Transgenders to get pension, ration and more in Andhra; govt clears welfare policy". Hindustan Times.
- "Andhra Pradesh launches welfare board for transgender persons, community welcomes move". The News Minute. 26 April 2017.
- Naqash, Rayan (4 February 2018). "For the first time, Kashmir government recognises needs of transgender community. But is it enough?". Scroll.in.
- "Jammu and Kashmir: Transgender community welcomes steps taken by Mehbooba Mufti government". 12 January 2018.
- "Delhi Commission for Women to have a dedicated transgender cell". Hindustan Times. 8 March 2019.
- "Establishing Delhi Transgender Welfare Board". Government of Delhi. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
- "In Rajasthan, transgenders to get identity cards soon to avail of scheme benefits". Hindustan Times. 13 July 2018.
- "Uttarakhand HC directs state to provide reservation to transgenders in educational institutions". Jagran Josh. 1 October 2018.
- "Draft Policy for Transgender" (PDF). Social Welfare Department of Assam. 3 February 2019.
- "Assam government criticized for giving a bad definition of transgender". Ne Now News. 14 January 2019.
- "Maharashtra Government Sets Up Transgender Welfare Board". NDTV. 23 February 2019.
- "Gujarat Govt Establishes Transgender Welfare Board; Housing, Education & Other Issues To Be Taken Care Of". The Logical Indian. 19 February 2019.
- "Bihar Govt Establishes Transgender Welfare Board, To Give Rs 1.5 Lakh For Sex Change Operation". The Logical Indian. 18 July 2019.
- "Bihar to help transgenders with Rs 1.5 lakh for sex change operation". The New Indian Express. 16 July 2019.
- "Madhya Pradesh to roll out welfare policy for transgenders". Hindustan Times. 5 August 2019.
- Prabhu, Gayathri (2014). "Writing a Life Between Gender Lines: Conversations with A. Revathi about Her Autobiography The Truth About Me: A Hijra Life Story". Archived from the original on 8 February 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2023.
- Umair, S. M. (29 September 2010). "Hope floats". The Hindu. Chennai, India.
- Winter, Gopi Shankar (2014). Maraikkappatta Pakkangal: மறைக்கப்பட்ட பக்கங்கள். Srishti Madurai. ISBN 9781500380939. OCLC 703235508.
- Achanta, Pushpa (9 October 2012). "My life, my way". The Hindu. Chennai, India.
- "Doraiswamy to Revathi: A Tamil writer-activist's alternative journey". Deccan Herald. 18 August 2010.
- "Madurai college's 'intersex' course to cover 58 genders". The Times of India. Retrieved 10 February 2018.
- "Students Will Study 58 Distinct Gender Identities at College in India". Out Magazine. Retrieved 10 February 2018.
- "BJP leader launches LGBT rights book in TN". Mumbai Mirror. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
- Shrikumar, A. (18 October 2013). "No more under siege - The Hindu". The Hindu. thehindu.com. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
- "Madurai student pens book on gender variants - Times of India". The Times of India. timesofindia.indiatimes.com. 4 June 2013. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
- Iyer, Malathy (7 February 2014). "Homosexuality is not a disease, psychiatrists say". The Times of India.
- Power, Shannon (8 June 2018). "India's biggest psychiatric body declares homosexuality is not an illness". Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 30 July 2019. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
- Pratap, Aayushi (6 June 2018). "Stop treating homosexuality as an illness, says Indian Psychiatric Society". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 2 September 2019.
- Singh, Amrita (1 June 2016). "From Shock Treatment To Yoga, Conversion Therapy Is A Disturbing Reality Around The World". HuffPost India.
- Perappadan, Bindu Shajan (2 September 2022). "'Conversion therapy' is misconduct, declares National Medical Commission". The Hindu. Retrieved 6 September 2022.
- S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police, W.P.No. 7284 of 2021 (Madras High Court).Text
- Emmanuel, Meera (28 April 2021). ""I am not fully 'woke' on this aspect:" Madras High Court Judge fixes appointment with psychologist to understand same-sex relationships better". Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- S, Mohamed Imranullah (29 April 2021). "Judge wants to learn about same sex relationships before penning judgment". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- Tripathi, Karan (7 June 2021). "Society Needs to Change, Not the LGBTQIA+ Couples: Madras HC". TheQuint. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- "Indian court calls for sweeping reforms to respect LGBT rights". Reuters. 7 June 2021.
- Krishnan, Murali (7 June 2021). "[BREAKING] Madras High Court bans medical attempts to cure sexual orientation; suggests changes to school curricula to educate students on LGBTQ". Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- "Madras High Court bans medical attempts to "cure" sexual orientation, issues guidelines for LGBTQIA+ community safety". India Legal. 7 June 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- "'I can make you straight in three months': Inside India's gay conversion industry".
- "One Who Fights For an Other". The New Indian Express.
- Sawant, Anagha (22 July 2016). "Now, a dating platform for LGBT community". Daily News and Analysis.
- "Same-sex attraction is OK, boys can cry, girl's no means no". The Indian Express. 21 February 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- "Homosexual attraction is OK; 'NO' means no: Health Ministry rises above Indian stereotypes". The Financial Express. 21 February 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- Menon, Priya (2 June 2018). "A decade of Pride in Chennai". The Times of India.
- "A walk to remember for the LGBT community - Times of India". The Times of India. 29 October 2017.
- "As India awaits a historic gay rights ruling, a city holds its first pride march". The Washington Post. 5 September 2018.
- "First Queer Pride Walk of Sikkim on January 27". Northeast Today. 4 January 2019.
- India – IDAHOTB 2018 Country Page Archived 27 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine, Erasing 76 Crimes
- Besanvalle, James (25 October 2018). "A third of Indian gay men are married to women who have no idea they're gay". Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 31 July 2019. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
- "Accept history and move on". The New Indian Express.
- "Eunuch MP takes seat". BBC News. 6 March 2000.
- "Transgender activist Kalki to seek DMK ticket". The New Indian Express. 5 March 2011. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Jaisankar, C.; Raghunathan, A. V. "Transgender Kalki in poll race". The Hindu. Chennai, India.
- Alter, Charlotte (6 January 2015). "India's First Openly Transgender Mayor Elected". Time. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "India's First Openly Transgender Mayor in Her Own Words". The Wall Street Journal. 7 January 2015.
- "First transgender mayor elected in central India: media". Reuters. 5 January 2015.
- France-Presse, Agence (5 January 2015). "Transgender woman is elected district mayor in Indian state of Chhattisgarh". the Guardian.
- IANS (9 June 2015). "India's first transgender college principal starts work". Business Standard India.
- "With a little help from Madras HC, Tamil Nadu gets its first transgender police officer". The Indian Express. 7 November 2015.
- "Lok Adalat makes history, appointed two transgenders as panelist". The Times of India. 12 February 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- "India's first transgender judge Joyita Mondal wants jobs for her community". The New Indian Express.
- "Assam gets its first transgender judge". The Economic Times. Asian News International. 15 July 2018. Archived from the original on 18 August 2018. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
- "Queering the Indian Elections 2019". Orinam.
- Nanda, Serena. Neither Man Nor Woman: The hijras of India, p. xx. Canada: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999
- "Read Why Gopi Shankar Calls Attention Of Arundhati Roy To Intersex Community". Indian Women Blog.Org. 24 November 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2018.
- Warne, Garry L.; Raza, Jamal (September 2008). "Disorders of sex development (DSDs), their presentation and management in different cultures". Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders. 9 (3): 227–236. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.469.9016. doi:10.1007/s11154-008-9084-2. ISSN 1389-9155. PMID 18633712. S2CID 8897416.
- Rajendran, R; Hariharan, S (1995). "Profile of Intersex Children in South India". Indian Pediatrics. 32 (6): 666–71. PMID 8613335.
- Sharma, Radha (5 February 2014). "Parents prefer male child in intersex operations in Gujarat". The Times of India. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Gupta, Devendra; Sharma, Shilpa (2012). "Male genitoplasty for 46 XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia patients presenting late and reared as males". Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 16 (6): 935–8. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.102994. ISSN 2230-8210. PMC 3510963. PMID 23226638.
- Karthikeyan, Ragamalika (3 February 2017). "Activists say surgical 'correction' of intersex babies at birth wrong, govt doesn't listen". The News Minute.
- Kalra, Sanjay; Kulshreshtha, Bindu; Unnikrishnan, Ambika Gopalakrishnan (2012). "We care for intersex: For Pinky, for Santhi, and for Anamika". Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 16 (6): 873–5. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.102980. ISSN 2230-8210. PMC 3510954. PMID 23226629.
- "Indian silver medalist female runner at Asian Games fails gender test". International Herald Tribune. 18 December 2006.
- "Indian runner fails gender test, loses medal". Sports.espn.go.com. 18 December 2006. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
- "Shanti fails Doha gender test". The Telegraph. Calcutta, India. 18 December 2006. Archived from the original on 29 May 2014.
- "Medical experts doubt Pinki Pramanik can rape". The Times of India. 14 November 2012. Archived from the original on 3 January 2013. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
- Court of Arbitration for Sport (July 2015). "CAS 2014/A/3759 Dutee Chand v. Athletics Federation of India (AFI) & The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF)" (PDF). Court of Arbitration for Sport. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 July 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2018.
- Genel M; Simpson J; de la Chapelle A (4 August 2016). "The olympic games and athletic sex assignment". JAMA. 316 (13): 1359–1360. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11850. ISSN 0098-7484. PMID 27490137.
- "Intersex person to contest from Madurai North". The Hindu. 30 April 2016.
- Menon, Priya (22 April 2016). "3rd gender gets a new champion in Tamil Nadu poll ring". The Times of India. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "Meet and Understand The First Genderqueer Candidate in Indian Politics". bodahub.com. 23 April 2016. Archived from the original on 15 April 2019. Retrieved 12 May 2017.
- "This intersex person is contesting TN polls, 'ze' wants to change your mind on sexual minorities - The News Minute". 24 April 2016.
- "How people in 24 countries view same-sex marriage". PewResearchCenter. Retrieved 13 June 2023.
- LGBT+ Pride 2021Global Survey (PDF) (Report). Ipsos. 9 June 2021. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
- Shreya Roy Chowdhury (17 October 2015). "Gay is 'normal' for 72% in IIT-D". The Times of India. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
- Homegrown. "8 Schools And Colleges In India With In-Campus LGBTQ Support Groups". homegrown.co.in. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
- "The Global Divide on Homosexuality Persists". Pew Research Center. 25 June 2020. Retrieved 21 December 2020.
- "ILGA-RIWI Global attitudes survey". igla.org. The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association. October 2017. Archived from the original on 23 May 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- "ILGA/RIWI Global Attitudes Survey on LGBTI People" (PDF). Ilga.org. International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association. 31 December 2016.
- "Young people and free speech". The Economist. 15 February 2017.
- "Dutee Chand becomes first openly gay Indian athlete". BBC News. 19 May 2019. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
- "Perfect Pairing: Menaka Guruswamy And Arundhati Katju". femina.in. Retrieved 15 April 2023.
- "7 Indian LGBT icons you need to know about, from Lilly Singh to Dutee Chand". South China Morning Post. 6 June 2022. Retrieved 16 April 2023.
- "A Manipur film tackles sexual identity for first time". The Indian Express. 25 April 2022. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
- "4 Homosexual Couples That Make You Believe That There Is A Rainbow Waiting For All Of Us". MissMalini. 5 April 2022. Retrieved 15 April 2023.
- Amiruddin, Zahra (15 June 2021). "Meet Benjamin Daimary, India's first openly gay actor to be honoured with the National Award". Vogue India. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
- "The poet and gay activist Vikram Seth has been awarded the 2017 Makwan Prize". EveryOne Group. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
- "Abhijit Iyer-Mitra". Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. Archived from the original on 8 April 2018. Retrieved 6 June 2023.
- Staff Reporter (30 April 2016). "Intersex person to contest from Madurai North". The Hindu.
- "Intersex candidate alleges harassment". Times of India. 10 May 2016. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- Mathew, Pheba (24 April 2016). "This intersex person is contesting TN polls, 'ze' wants to change your mind on sexual minorities". The News Minute. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
- "Gay sex now a legal right: All you need to know about Section 377". 6 September 2018.
- "Now, confusion over age of consent | India News - Times of India". The Times of India. 5 July 2009.
- "Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. versus Union of India Thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice" (PDF). Supreme Court of India. 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 July 2023. Retrieved 6 June 2023.
|archive-url=timestamp mismatch (help)
- Rajagopal, Krishnadas (25 November 2022). "Supreme Court seeks govt response on including same-sex marriage under Special Marriage Act". The Hindu. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
- Sophia Jones (29 July 2011). "Lesbian newlyweds flee honor killing threats in India – Foreign Policy". Foreignpolicy.com. Retrieved 7 April 2019.
- "Lesbian couple seeks protection from Rajasthan HC". The Times of India. 27 February 2019.
- "Same-sex couple fears threat from kin, Punjab and Haryana HC orders security". The Times of India. 21 November 2020.
- "Madras HC judge asks parents of lesbian couple to undergo counselling from LGBTQ-specialist". April 2021.
- "Kerala high court reunites same sex couple separated by parents". June 2022.
- "Calcutta High Court ruled that consensual cohabitation between two adults of the same sex is not illegal". 14 February 2019.
- "Orissa HC Allows Same-Sex Live-In Couple To Stay Together". 25 August 2020.
- Rajesh Kumar Pandey (19 November 2021). "Allahabad HC gives same-sex couple in live-in relationship cop cover". Times of India. Archived from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 6 June 2023.
- "Gujarat: Lesbian police couple knocks HC seeking safety from family". 26 July 2020.
- "Delhi HC grants protection to same-sex interfaith couple fearing threats from family". The Hindu. 2 June 2023.
- "Bombay HC Orders Police To Provide Protection To Same-Sex Couple". The Free Press Journal. 5 July 2023.
- "Child rights panel opposes plea seeking changes in adoption law for gay couples". IndianExpress. 14 April 2023. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
- "No law prohibits lesbians from adopting child after the decriminalization of homosexuality". Delhi IVF. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
- ""Infringes Reproductive Rights" : IVF Specialist Moves Supreme Court Challenging Provisions Of Surrogacy Regulation Act & ART Act". 28 August 2022.
- Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs named
- "Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment - Government of India".
- "Ayushman Bharat would cover all aspects of transition related healthcare for TG persons, including coverage for hormone therapy, sex re-assignment surgery inclusive of post operation formalities". The Times of India. 11 February 2022. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
- "1st in India & Asia, and 2nd globally, Tamil Nadu bans sex-selective surgeries for infants". ThePrint. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- "HC gives govt 8 weeks time to consider Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights's view". The Times of India. 30 July 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- "India court recognises transgender people as third gender". BBC News. 15 April 2014.
- "Transgender Person Becoming Woman After Surgery Can Seek Relief Under Domestic Violence Act". News18. 31 March 2023. Retrieved 1 April 2023.
- "IPS: Position statement regarding LGBTQ". Indian Psychiatric Society. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
- "'I can make you straight in three months': Inside India's gay conversion industry".
- "'Cure therapy' ban to training for police: Madras HC reaches out to LGBTQ". IndianExpress. 8 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
- "IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.06.2021 : CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH" (PDF). Images.assettype.com. Retrieved 27 July 2022.
- "National Medical Commission forbids conversion therapy | India News - Times of India". The Times of India. 22 February 2022.
- "Supreme Court agrees to examine Centre's Blood Donor guidelines that prohibit donations from gay men and transgender persons". BarandBench. 12 March 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.