Bharatiya Janata Party: Difference between revisions

Created by Kannadaguy
Last edited May 8, 2026
No edit summary
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Indian political party}}
{{Short description|Indian political party}}
{{Redirect|BJP}}
{{Pp-semi-indef}}
 
{{Pp-move|small=yes}}
 
{{Good article}}
{{Good article}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2021}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2021}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}
{{Redirect|BJP}}
{{Infobox Indian political party
{{Infobox Indian political party
| party_name        = Bharatiya Janata Party
| logo              = Logo of the Bharatiya Janata Party.svg
| logo              = Bharatiya Janata Party logo.svg
| abbreviation      = BJP
| abbreviation      = BJP
| colorcode        = {{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
| colorcode        = {{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
| president        = [[J. P. Nadda]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Jagat Prakash Nadda: BJP's new national president rises through the ranks, faces several challenges |url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/jagat-prakash-nadda-bjps-new-national-president-rises-through-the-ranks-faces-several-challenges-2258301.html |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=Zee News |date=20 January 2020 |author=Ananya Das |archive-date=28 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152910/https://zeenews.india.com/india/jagat-prakash-nadda-bjps-new-national-president-rises-through-the-ranks-faces-several-challenges-2258301.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
| president        = [[Nitin Nabin]]<ref>{{Cite news|title=Nitin Nabin elected national BJP president unopposed: To take charge January 20; PM Modi to attend event|work=Times of India|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/nitin-nabin-elected-national-bjp-president-unopposed-to-take-charge-january-20-pm-modi-to-attend-event/articleshow/126684522.cms|access-date=19 January 2026}}</ref>
| national_convener = <--Bharatiya Janata Party does not have any National Convener.-->
| general_secretary = {{clist
| general_secretary  = [[B. L. Santhosh]]<br />Shiv Prakash<ref>{{cite news |title=Meet BL Santhosh, newly appointed general secretary of BJP |url=https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=live mint |date=15 July 2019 |author=Gyan Varma |archive-date=28 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152911/https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
  | '''Organisation:''' {{ubl
| treasurer = [[Rajesh Agarwal]]<ref>{{Cite news|date=27 September 2020|title=Rajesh Agarwal gets BJP treasurer post|work=United News of India|url=http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|access-date=12 October 2020|archive-date=17 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017113913/http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
    | B. L. Santhosh<ref>{{Cite news|author=Gyan Varma|date=15 July 2019|title=Meet BL Santhosh, newly appointed general secretary of BJP|work=[[Mint (newspaper)|Mint]]|url=https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html|url-status=live|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152911/https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html|archive-date=28 March 2020}}</ref>
| presidium = [[National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive]]<ref name=Constitution>{{cite web |title=Bharatiya Janata Party Constitution |url=https://www.bjp.org/en/constitution|website=BJP official website |publisher=Bharatiya Janata Party |access-date=15 May 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171118173055/http://www.bjp.org/images/pdf_2012_h/constitution_eng_jan_10_2013.pdf |archive-date=18 November 2017 }}</ref>
}}
| ppchairman        = [[Narendra Modi]]<br /> ([[Prime Minister of India|Prime Minister]])
  | '''Joint General Secretary:''' {{ubl
| loksabha_leader  = [[Narendra Modi]]<br /> ([[Leader of the House in Lok Sabha]])<ref name=":3000">{{cite news |title=BJP announces new parliamentary committee; Modi leader in Lok Sabha, Rajnath his deputy |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12 |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=India Today |date=12 June 2019 |archive-date=6 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141325/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12 |url-status=live }}</ref>
    | [[Shiv Prakash]]
| rajyasabha_leader = [[Piyush Goyal]]<br /> ([[Leader of the House in Rajya Sabha]])
}}
| foundation        = {{Start date and age|df=yes|p=y|1980|04|06}}<ref name=":4000">{{cite news |title=BJP's foundation day: Brief history of the achievements and failures of the party |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/ |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=The Indian Express |date=6 April 2019 |archive-date=11 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190511143721/https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
  | '''General Secretaries:''' {{ubl
| founder          = {{ublist | [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] | [[L. K. Advani]]<ref name=":3001">{{cite news |title=What you need to know about India's BJP |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=AlJazeera |date=23 May 2019 |archive-date=13 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513075856/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html |url-status=live }}</ref>}}
    | [[Arun Singh (Indian politician)|Arun Singh]]
| headquarters      = 6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, <br />[[New Delhi]], [[Delhi]], [[India]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|title=BJP Gets A New Address; Soul Of New Office Is The Party Worker, Says PM Modi|website=NDTV.com|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-date=6 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141326/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|url-status=live}}</ref>
    | [[Kailash Vijayvargiya]]
    | [[Dushyant Kumar Gautam]]
    | Tarun Chugh
    | [[Vinod Tawde]]
    | Sunil Bansal
    | [[Bandi Sanjay Kumar]]
    | [[Radha Mohan Das Agarwal]]
    }}
  }}
| treasurer         = [[Rajesh Agarwal]]<ref>{{Cite news|date=27 September 2020|title=Rajesh Agarwal gets BJP treasurer post|work=[[United News of India]]|url=http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|url-status=live|access-date=12 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017113913/http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|archive-date=17 October 2020}}</ref>
| presidium        = [[National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive]]<ref name="Constitution">{{Cite web|title=Bharatiya Janata Party Constitution|url=https://www.bjp.org/en/constitution|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171118173055/http://www.bjp.org/images/pdf_2012_h/constitution_eng_jan_10_2013.pdf|archive-date=18 November 2017|access-date=15 May 2020|website=|publisher=Bharatiya Janata Party}}</ref>
| loksabha_leader  = [[Narendra Modi]] ([[Leader of the House in Lok Sabha]])<ref name=":3000">{{Cite news|date=12 June 2019|title=BJP announces new parliamentary committee; Modi leader in Lok Sabha, Rajnath his deputy|work=[[India Today]]|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12|url-status=live|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141325/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12|archive-date=6 April 2020}}</ref>
| rajyasabha_leader = [[J. P. Nadda]] ([[Leader of the House in Rajya Sabha]])<ref>{{cite web |title=Leader of the House |url=https://sansad.in/rs/about/leader-of-the-house |website=[[Rajya Sabha]] |access-date=27 March 2025}}</ref>
| foundation        = {{Start date and age|df=yes|1980|04|06}}<ref name=":4000">{{Cite news|date=6 April 2019|title=BJP's foundation day: Brief history of the achievements and failures of the party|work=[[The Indian Express]]|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190511143721/https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/|archive-date=11 May 2019}}</ref>
| founder          = {{ubl
  | [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
  | [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]]<ref name=":3001">{{Cite news|date=23 May 2019|title=What you need to know about India's BJP|work=[[Al Jazeera]]|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html|url-status=live|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513075856/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html|archive-date=13 May 2020}}</ref>
  }} {{cslist
  | title = Other founders<ref name="founders" />
  | [[Murli Manohar Joshi]]<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jain |first=Praveen |date=7 January 2024 |title=Murli Manohar Joshi turns 90: Well-wishers flock to Raisina Road to celebrate life of BJP stalwart |url=https://theprint.in/in-pictures/murli-manohar-joshi-turns-90-well-wishers-flock-to-raisina-road-to-celebrate-life-of-bjp-stalwart/1913267/ |access-date=18 January 2025 |website=ThePrint |language=en-US}}</ref>
  | [[Nanaji Deshmukh]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bharat Ratna for Pranab, Nanaji Deshmukh and Bhupen Hazarika |url=http://www.bihartimes.in/newsbihar/2019/jan/newsbihar25jan12.html |access-date=18 January 2025 |website=Bihar Times}}</ref>
  | [[K. R. Malkani]]<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sir |first=Sp |date=29 April 2021 |title=K R Malkani - The Sindhu World Sindhi Author: The Sindh Story: Sindhi Politician: Political Mysteries |url=https://thesindhuworld.com/k-r-malkani/ |access-date=18 January 2025 |website=The Sindhu World |language=en-US}}</ref>
  | [[Sikandar Bakht]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=6 April 2024 |script-title=hi:कौन थे बीजेपी के इकलौते मुस्लिम फाउंडर सिकंदर बख्त? जानिए कैसे थामा पार्टी का साथ |url=https://www.abplive.com/news/india/bjp-foundation-day-who-was-bjp-muslim-founder-sikandar-bakht-political-career-profile-in-hindi-2658177 |access-date=18 January 2025 |website= |language=hi}}</ref>
  | [[Vijay Kumar Malhotra]]
  | [[Vijaya Raje Scindia]]<ref>{{Cite news |last=Jain |first=Devaki |work=The Citizen (India) |url=https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/7/20759/The-Maharani-who-Founded-the-BJP |title=The Maharani who founded the BJP |date=14 August 2021 }}</ref>
  | [[Bhairon Singh Shekhawat]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 May 2023 |title=Rajput votes at stake in Rajasthan, Bhairon Singh Shekhawat legacy a new front in BJP, Cong battle |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/rajput-rajasthan-bhairon-singh-shekhawat-bjp-congress-8623357/ |access-date=18 January 2025 |website=[[The Indian Express]] |language=en}}</ref>
  | [[Shanta Kumar]]
  | [[Ram Jethmalani]]
  | [[Jagannathrao Joshi]]
  }}
| headquarters      = 6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, [[New Delhi]], Delhi, India<ref>{{Cite web |title=BJP Gets A New Address; Soul Of New Office Is The Party Worker, Says PM Modi|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141326/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|archive-date=6 April 2020|access-date=16 March 2020 |website=[[NDTV]]}}</ref>
| membership        =  
| eci              = [[List of political parties in India#National parties|National Party]]{{sfn|Election Commission|2013}}
| eci              = [[List of political parties in India#National parties|National Party]]{{sfn|Election Commission|2013}}
| alliance          = [[National Democratic Alliance]]<br />([[India|All India]])<ref name="bjp0right">{{cite news |title=BJP + 29 Parties = National Democratic Alliance |url=https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972 |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=NDTV |date=20 May 2014 |author=Devesh Kumar |archive-date=6 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141401/https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972 |url-status=live }}</ref><br />
| alliance          = * '''National Alliances'''<br/>
[[North-East Democratic Alliance]]<br />([[Northeast India]])<ref>{{cite news |title=BJP seals alliances in Northeast, aims 22 LS seats |url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=The Hindu Business Line |date=13 March 2019 |archive-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317165853/https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[National Democratic Alliance|NDA]] ([[India|All India]])<ref name="bjp0right">{{Cite news|author=Devesh Kumar|date=20 May 2014|title=BJP + 29 Parties=National Democratic Alliance|work=NDTV|url=https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141401/https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972|archive-date=6 April 2020}}</ref>
| loksabha_seats    = {{Composition bar|301|543|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''543''' MPs & '''0''' Vacant)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|title=Party Position pdf|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317173437/http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[North-East Democratic Alliance|NEDA]] ([[Northeast India]])<ref>{{Cite news|date=13 March 2019|title=BJP seals alliances in Northeast, aims 22 LS seats|work=The Hindu Business Line|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece |url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317165853/https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece|archive-date=17 March 2020}}</ref>
| rajyasabha_seats  = {{Composition bar|93|245|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''237''' MPs & '''8''' Vacant)<ref>{{cite web|title = Alphabetical Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|url = https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|access-date = 22 September 2019|archive-date = 4 June 2019|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190604121829/https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|title=Strengthwise Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|publisher=Rajya Sabha|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170606134311/http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|archive-date=6 June 2017}}</ref><!-- Please do not change without a more up-to-date reference --><!-- Seats after Rajya Sabha election, 2020 -->
* '''Regional Alliances'''
| state_seats_name  = [[State Legislative Assembly (India)|State Legislative Assemblies]]
* [[Kutami]] ([[Andhra Pradesh]])
| state_seats      = {{Composition bar|1363|4036|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
* [[Meghalaya Democratic Alliance (2018–present)|MDA]] ([[Meghalaya]])
('''4025''' MLAs &
* [[Maha Yuti|MY]] ([[Maharashtra]])<ref>{{cite web |author1=India Today Video Desk |title=Our alliance is not going to break: Eknath Shinde dismisses rift rumours |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/video/our-alliance-is-not-going-to-break-eknath-shinde-dismisses-rift-rumours-2687879-2025-03-02 |website=[[India Today]] |access-date=27 March 2025 |date=2 March 2025}}</ref>
'''11''' Vacant)
* [[AIADMK-led Alliance]] ([[Tamil Nadu]])
([[#Current seats in State Legislative Assemblies|see complete list]])
* [[People's Democratic Alliance (Nagaland)]]
| state2_seats_name = [[State Legislative Council (India)|State Legislative Councils]]
| loksabha_seats    = {{Composition bar|240|543|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''540''' MPs and '''3''' vacant)<ref>{{Cite web|title=Party Position pdf|url=http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317173437/http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|archive-date=17 March 2020|access-date=17 March 2020}}</ref>
| state2_seats      = {{Composition bar|165|426|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| rajyasabha_seats  = {{Composition bar|106|245|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}<!-- Seats after Rajya Sabha election in 2026 --> ('''243''' MPs and '''2''' vacant)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjps-rajya-sabha-tally-dips-to-86-nda-at-101-party-below-majority-mark-6109105 | title=BJP's Rajya Sabha Tally Dips, NDA Now 4 Below Majority Mark }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Alphabetical Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|url=https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190604121829/https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|archive-date=4 June 2019|access-date=22 September 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Strengthwise Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|url=http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170606134311/http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|archive-date=6 June 2017|publisher=Rajya Sabha}}</ref><!-- DO NOT CHANGE without a more up-to-date reference -->
('''403''' MLCs & '''23''' Vacant)
| state2_seats_name  = [[State Legislative Assembly (India)|State Legislative Assemblies]]
([[#Current seats in State Legislative councils|see complete list]])
| state2_seats      = {{Composition bar|1656|4126|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''4118''' MLAs and '''8''' vacant; [[#Current seats in State Legislative Assemblies|complete list]])
| no_states        = {{Composition bar|15|31|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''28''' States and '''3''' UTs)<ref>{{cite news|title=BJP gains back Madhya Pradesh in just 15 months after losing it|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|work=India Today|date=26 November 2019|access-date=23 March 2020|archive-date=19 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211119202332/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|url-status=live}}</ref><br />
| state_seats_name = [[State Legislative Council (India)|State Legislative Councils]]
| ideology          = {{ubl|class=nowrap|
| state_seats      = {{Composition bar|165|426|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''403''' MLCs and '''23''' vacant; [[#Current seats in State Legislative councils|complete list]])
|[[Conservatism]] ([[Conservatism in India|Indian]])<ref name="mathewjoh">* {{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=Matthew |last2=Garnett |first2=Mark |last3=Walker |first3=David M |date=2017 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |title=Conservatism and Ideology |publisher=[[Routledge]] |pages=45–50 |isbn=978-1-317-52900-2 |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061245/https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |url-status=live }}
| no_states        = {{Composition bar|21|31|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''28''' States and '''3''' UTs)<ref>{{Cite news|date=26 November 2019|title=BJP gains back Madhya Pradesh in just 15 months after losing it|work=India Today|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|url-status=live|access-date=23 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211119202332/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|archive-date=19 November 2021}}</ref>
* Björn Goldstein (2015) The unconscious Indianization of 'Western' conservatism – is Indian conservatism a universal model?, Global Discourse, 5:1, 44-65, {{doi|10.1080/23269995.2014.946315}}
| ideology          = {{ubl|class=nowrap
* {{cite journal |last1=Mazumdar |first1=Surajit |date=2017 |title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India |url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93182 |publisher=[[Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich]] |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=115–131 |doi= |access-date=24 April 2022 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061248/https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93182/ |url-status=live }}
  | [[Conservatism]] ([[Conservatism in India|Indian]])<ref name="mathewjoh">* {{Cite book|last1=Johnson|first1=Matthew|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism|title=Conservatism and Ideology|last2=Garnett|first2=Mark |last3=Walker|first3=David M|date=2017|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=978-1-317-52900-2|pages=45–50|access-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061245/https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism|archive-date=14 April 2023|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|last1=Chhibber|first1=Pradeep. K.|last2=Verma|first2=Rahul|isbn=978-0-190-62390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|pages=50–150|year=2018|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Björn Goldstein (2015) The unconscious Indianization of 'Western' conservatism – is Indian conservatism a universal model?, Global Discourse, 5:1, 44–65, {{doi|10.1080/23269995.2014.946315}}
|[[Hindu nationalism]]<ref>
* {{cite journal|last1=Mazumdar|first1=Surajit|date=2017|title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India|url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93182|journal=Desenvolvimento Em Debate|volume=5|issue=1|pages=115–131|doi=10.51861/ded.dmds.1.011|access-date=24 April 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061248/https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93182/|url-status=live| issn = 2176-9257|doi-access=free}}
* Henrik Berglund. "Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP." [[Economic and Political Weekly]] 39, no. 10 (2004): 1064–70. {{JSTOR|4414737}}.
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|last1=Chhibber|first1=Pradeep. K.|last2=Verma|first2=Rahul|isbn=978-0-19-062390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|pages=50–150|year=2018|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref>
  | [[Neoliberalism]]<ref name="Surajit 2017">* {{Cite journal|last=Mazumdar|first=Surajit|date=2017|title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India|url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93182 |url-status=live|journal=Desenvolvimento Em Debate|volume=5|issue=1 |pages=115–131|doi=10.51861/ded.dmds.1.011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061248/https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93182/|archive-date=14 April 2023|access-date=24 April 2022|doi-access=free}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Gopalakrishnan|first1=Shankar|title=Defining, Constructing and Policing a 'New India': Relationship between Neoliberalism and Hindutva|journal=Economic & Political Weekly|date=7 July 2006|volume=41|issue=26|pages=2803–2813|jstor=4418408|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408|access-date=26 September 2020|archive-date=17 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017234207/https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408|url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Wilson|first1=Kalpana|last2=Ung Loh|first2=Jennifer|last3=Purewal|first3=Navtej|title=Gender, Violence and the Neoliberal State in India|journal=Feminist Review|date=July 2018|volume=119|issue=1|pages=1–6|doi=10.1057/s41305-018-0109-8|s2cid=149814002|url=https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf|access-date=8 November 2020|archive-date=10 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201210111943/https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf|url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Mathur|first1=Navdeep|title=The low politics of higher education: saffron branded neoliberalism and the assault on Indian universities|journal=Critical Policy Studies|date=2018|volume=12 |issue=1|pages=121–125|doi=10.1080/19460171.2017.1403343|s2cid=148842457}}</ref>
  | [[Hindutva]]<ref name="Angana.p">* {{Cite book|last1=Chatterji|first1=Angana P.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology|title=Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India|last2=Hansen|first2=Thomas Blom|last3=Jaffrelot|first3=Christophe|date=2019|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-007817-1|pages=100–130|author-link=Angana P. Chatterji|author-link2=Thomas Blom Hansen|author-link3=Christophe Jaffrelot|access-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology|archive-date=14 April 2023|url-status=live}}
* [[Christophe Jaffrelot|Jaffrelot, Christophe]], and Cynthia Schoch. "Conclusion to Part I." In Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, 148–54. [[Princeton University Press]], 2021. {{doi|10.2307/j.ctv1dc9jzx.12}}.
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|last1=Chhibber|first1=Pradeep. K.|last2=Verma|first2=Rahul |isbn=978-0-19-062390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|year=2018|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref>
  | [[Hindu nationalism]]<ref>* Henrik Berglund. "Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP." [[Economic and Political Weekly]] 39, no. 10 (2004): 1064–70. {{JSTOR|4414737}}.
* Chhibber, Pradeep K. "State Policy, Party Politics, and the Rise of the BJP." In Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India, 159–76. [[University of Michigan Press]], 1999. {{JSTOR|10.3998/mpub.23136.12}}.</ref>
* Chhibber, Pradeep K. "State Policy, Party Politics, and the Rise of the BJP." In Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India, 159–76. [[University of Michigan Press]], 1999. {{JSTOR|10.3998/mpub.23136.12}}.</ref>
|[[Hindutva]]<ref name="Angana.p">* {{cite book |last1=Chatterji |first1=Angana P. |last2=Hansen |first2=Thomas Blom |last3=Jaffrelot |first3=Christophe |date=2019 |title=Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |pages=100–130 |isbn=978-0-19-007817-1 |author-link1=Angana P. Chatterji |author-link2=Thomas Blom Hansen |author-link3=Christophe Jaffrelot |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology |url-status=live }}
  | [[Right-wing populism]]<ref>{{multiref
* [[Christophe Jaffrelot|Jaffrelot, Christophe]], and Cynthia Schoch. "Conclusion to Part I." In Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, 148–54. [[Princeton University Press]], 2021. {{doi|10.2307/j.ctv1dc9jzx.12}}.
    | {{cite journal|volume=26|issue=3|journal=Democratization|first1=Duncan|last1=McDonnell|year=2019|first2=Luis|last2=Cabrera|title=The right-wing populism of India's Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care)|pages=484–501|doi=10.1080/13510347.2018.1551885|s2cid=149464986}}
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|author=Chhibber, Pradeep K. and Verma, Rahul|isbn=978-0-190-62390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|year=2018|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref>
| {{Cite book|last=Özçelik|first=Ezgi|title=Right-wing Populist Governments Rhetorical Framing of Economic Inequality : the Cases of BJP in India and AKP in Turkey|publisher=Koç University|year=2019}}
|[[Neoliberalism]]<ref name="Surajit 2017">* {{Cite book|last=Mazumdar|first=Surajit|title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India|publisher=University Library of Munich|year=2017|location=Germany}}
}} </ref>
* {{cite journal |last1=Gopalakrishnan |first1=Shankar |title=Defining, Constructing and Policing a 'New India': Relationship between Neoliberalism and Hindutva |journal=Economic & Political Weekly |date=7 July 2006 |volume=41 |issue=26 |pages=2803–2813 |jstor=4418408 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408 |access-date=26 September 2020 |archive-date=17 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017234207/https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408 |url-status=live }}
  }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Wilson |first1=Kalpana |last2=Ung Loh |first2=Jennifer |last3=Purewal |first3=Navtej |title=Gender, Violence and the Neoliberal State in India |journal=Feminist Review |date=July 2018 |volume=119 |issue=1 |pages=1–6 |doi=10.1057/s41305-018-0109-8 |s2cid=149814002 |url=https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=10 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201210111943/https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf |url-status=live }}
| position          = {{Nowrap|[[Right-wing politics|Right-wing]]{{sfnm|1a1=Malik|1a2=Singh|1y=1992|1pp=318–336|BBC|2012|2a1=Banerjee|2y=2005|2p=3118}} to [[Far-right politics|far-right]]<ref name="Davies"/>}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Mathur |first1=Navdeep |title=The low politics of higher education: saffron branded neoliberalism and the assault on Indian universities |journal=Critical Policy Studies |date=2018 |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=121–125 |doi=10.1080/19460171.2017.1403343|s2cid=148842457 }}</ref>
| publication      = {{ubl
|[[Right-wing populism]]<ref>
  | ''[[Kamal Sandesh]]'' (English and Hindi)<ref>{{Cite news|author=Siddhartha Rai|date=27 January 2017|title=PM Modi goes cashless, buys lifetime subscription of BJP mouthpiece Kamal Sandesh through cheque|work=[[India Today]]|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328080500/https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27 |archive-date=28 March 2020}}</ref>
* {{cite journal|volume=26|issue=3|journal=Democratization|first1=Duncan|last1=McDonnell|year=2019|first2=Luis|last2=Cabrera|title=The right-wing populism of India's Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care)|pages=484–501|doi=10.1080/13510347.2018.1551885|s2cid=149464986}}
  | ''Kamal Barta'' (Bengali)<ref>{{Cite news|last=Sengupta|first=Tamal|title=Bengal BJP revamps party mouthpiece before 2018 panchayet elections|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook&from=mdr|url-status=live|access-date=29 May 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook&from=mdr|archive-date=14 April 2023}}</ref>
* {{cite book|publisher=Koç University|title=Right-wing Populist Governments Rhetorical Framing of Economic Inequality : the Cases of BJP in India and AKP in Turkey|year=2019|first=Ezgi|last=Özçelik}}</ref>  
  }}
|[[Integral humanism (India)|Integral humanism]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=Matthew |last2=Garnett |first2=Mark |last3=Walker |first3=David M |date=2017 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |title=Conservatism and Ideology |publisher=[[Routledge]] |pages=45–50 |isbn=978-1-317-52900-2 |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061245/https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |url-status=live }}</ref>
| students          = <!-- Do not put ABVP here <ref>{{Cite web|title=Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad is not the students' wing of BJP: Shreehari Borikar|url=https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200228202158/https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|archive-date=28 February 2020|access-date=23 September 2019}}</ref> -->
| youth            = [[Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha]]<ref>{{Cite news|date=19 January 2019|title=BJP youth wing launches its campaign for party's Lok Sabha poll win|work=[[The Economic Times]]|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms|url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012115329/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms|archive-date=12 October 2020}}</ref>
| women            = [[BJP Mahila Morcha]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=5 April 2019 |title=Quota for women in council of ministers among Mahila Morcha's suggestions for BJP poll manifesto |work=Economic Times |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |url-status=live |access-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220607235558/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |archive-date=7 June 2022}}</ref>
| peasants          = BJP Kisan Morcha<ref name="KisanMorcha">{{Cite news|author=Rajkumar|script-title=hi:सरकार की नीतियों को किसानों तक पहुंचाएगा बीजेपी किसान मोर्चा|work=m.patrika.com|url=https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/|url-status=live|access-date=8 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201019220329/https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/ |archive-date=19 October 2020}}</ref>
| think_tank        = Public Policy Research Centre<ref>{{Cite web|title=Public Policy Research Centre|url=http://www.pprc.in/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726220734/http://www.pprc.in/|archive-date=26 July 2020 |access-date=22 July 2020}}</ref><ref name="Thinktank">{{multiref
  | {{Cite news |date=23 May 2020|title=BJP think tank offers online course in governance; babus to impart lessons|publisher=[[The New Indian Express]]|location=[[New Delhi]]|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html |url-status=live|access-date=14 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200714094916/https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html |archive-date=14 July 2020}}
  | {{cite news|url =https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|title =BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card|publisher =[[The Pioneer (India)|The Pioneer]]|quote =Public Policy Research Center (PPRC), BJP's think tank, on Monday released a comprehensive report on 100 major decisions and initiatives taken by Modi Government in first 100 days.|location =New Delhi|date =10 September 2019|website =dailypioneer.com|access-date =14 July 2020|archive-date =16 July 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200716135158/https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|url-status =live}}
  }}</ref>
| website          = {{url|www.bjp.org|bjp.org}}
| predecessor      = {{ubl
  | [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]] (1951–1977)<ref name=":4000" />
  | [[Janata Party]] (1977–1980)<ref name=":4000" />
  }}
| split            = [[Janata Party]]<ref name=":4000" />
| labour            = [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]] (unofficial)<ref>{{Cite news|author=Pragya Singh|date=15 January 2008|title=Need to Know BJP-led BMS is biggest labour union in India|work=live mint|url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html |url-status=live|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181103131425/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html|archive-date=3 November 2018}}</ref>
| international    = [[Asia Pacific Democracy Union]] (formerly)<ref>{{Cite web|title=International Democrat Union » Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU)|url=http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170616235358/http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|archive-date=16 June 2017|access-date=12 June 2017|website=International Democracy Union}}</ref>
| colours          = {{colour box|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}|border=darkgray}} Saffron<ref>{{Cite web|last=Iwanek|first=Krzysztof|date=10 September 2018|title=Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties|url=https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623014149/https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|archive-date=23 June 2021|access-date=5 July 2021|publisher=[[The Diplomat (magazine)|The Diplomat]]|language=en-US}}</ref>
| symbol            = [[File:Lotos flower symbol.svg|frameless|class=skin-invert|upright=0.5]]<br/>Lotus
| flag              = BJP Flag.svg{{!}}border
| leader            =
}}
}}
| position          = [[Right-wing politics|Right-wing]]{{sfnm|1a1=Malik|1a2=Singh|1y=1992|1pp=318–336|BBC|2012|2a1=Banerjee|2y=2005|2p=3118}}
{{Bharatiya Janata Party sidebar}}{{Contains special characters|Indic}}
| publication      = ''[[Kamal Sandesh]]'' {{nowrap|([[English language|English]] and [[Hindi]])<ref>{{cite news |title=PM Modi goes cashless, buys lifetime subscription of BJP mouthpiece Kamal Sandesh through cheque |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27 |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=India Today |date=27 January 2017 |author=Siddhartha Rai |archive-date=28 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328080500/https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27 |url-status=live }}</ref>}}<br>
 
''Kamal Barta'' {{nowrap|([[Bengali language|Bengali]])<ref>{{cite news | url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook | title=Bengal BJP revamps party mouthpiece before 2018 panchayet elections | newspaper=The Economic Times | last1=Sengupta | first1=Tamal | access-date=29 May 2022 | archive-date=14 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook&from=mdr | url-status=live }}</ref>}}
The '''Bharatiya Janata Party'''{{efn|{{IPA|/bʱaːɾət̪iːjə dʒənət̪aː paːrtiː/|audio=Hindi-Bharatiya Janata Party.ogg}}}} ('''BJP'''; {{lit|Indian People's Party}}) is a [[Conservatism|conservative]] political party in [[India]] and one of the two major [[List of political parties in India|Indian political parties]] alongside the [[Indian National Congress]].<ref>{{Cite news|date=19 May 2016|title=In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress|work=The Times of India|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|url-status=live|access-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171105170102/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|archive-date=5 November 2017}}</ref> BJP emerged from [[Shyama Prasad Mukherjee]]'s [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=6 July 2019 |title=Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the barrister who founded Bharatiya Janta Party |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-affairs/story/remembering-shyama-prasad-mukherjee-the-founder-of-bharatiya-jana-sangh-that-later-became-bharatiya-janta-party-1563356-2019-07-06 |access-date=24 December 2024 |website=[[India Today]] |language=en}}</ref> Since 2014, it has been the [[List of ruling political parties by country|ruling political party in India]] under the incumbent [[Prime Minister of India|prime minister]] [[Narendra Modi]].<ref name="zeenews-25May19">{{Cite news |date=25 May 2019 |title=Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303 |work=[[Zee News]] |url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806 |url-status=live |access-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190602032641/https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806 |archive-date=2 June 2019}}</ref> The BJP is [[Right-wing politics|right-wing]] to [[Far-right politics|far-right]] on the [[political spectrum]], and it has close ideological and organisational links to the [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh]] (RSS), a far-right [[Paramilitary organization|paramilitary organisation]].<ref>{{Cite news|date=17 March 2019|title=Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch|work=[[Business Standard]]|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|url-status=live|access-date=18 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152912/https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|archive-date=28 March 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23210230231166197 | doi=10.1177/23210230231166197 | title=Hindu Nationalism and Right-wing Ecology: RSS, Modi and Motherland Post-2014 | date=2023 | last1=Sharma | first1=Mukul | journal=Studies in Indian Politics | volume=11 | pages=102–117 | url-access=subscription }}</ref> The party's policies adhere to [[Hindutva]], a [[Hindu nationalism|Hindu nationalist]] ideology.{{sfn|Banerjee|2005|p=3118}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|p=318}} {{as of|2024|01|post=,}} it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in [[Parliament of India|the parliament]] as well as [[State legislature (India)|state legislatures]].
| students          = [[Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad]]<br />(unofficial)<ref>{{cite web|title = Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad is not the students' wing of BJP: Shreehari Borikar|url = https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|access-date = 23 September 2019|archive-date = 28 February 2020|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200228202158/https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|url-status = live}}</ref>
 
| youth            = [[Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha]]<ref>{{cite news |title=BJP youth wing launches its campaign for party's Lok Sabha poll win |url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=Economic Times |date=19 January 2019 |archive-date=8 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201008021552/https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms |url-status=live }}</ref>
The party's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, after he left the [[Hindu Mahasabha]] to form a party as the political wing of the RSS.{{sfn|Swain|2001|p=60}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Subba |first=Chhawang |date=4 April 2022 |title=Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and the Role of Bharatiya Jana Sangh in Indian Politics |url=https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2204072.pdf |website=IJCRT |page=a570 |issn=2320-2882 |access-date=21 February 2024 |archive-date=21 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240221100951/https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2204072.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> After [[The Emergency (India)|the Emergency]] of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the [[Janata Party]]; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the [[1977 Indian general election|1977 general election]]. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the [[1984 Indian general election|1984 general election]], it grew in strength on the back of the [[Ram Rath Yatra]] in [[Uttar Pradesh]]. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]], lasted for only 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}}
| women            = [[BJP Mahila Morcha]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Quota for women in council of ministers among Mahila Morcha's suggestions for BJP poll manifesto |url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=Economic Times |date=5 April 2019 |archive-date=23 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023222414/https://m.economictimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |url-status=live }}</ref>
| farmers      = BJP Kisan Morcha<ref name="KisanMorcha">{{cite news|url =https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/|title =सरकार की नीतियों को किसानों तक पहुंचाएगा बीजेपी किसान मोर्चा|website =m.patrika.com|author =Rajkumar|access-date =8 August 2020|archive-date =19 October 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20201019220329/https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/|url-status =live}}</ref>
| think_tank        = Public Policy Research Centre<ref>{{cite web|title=Public Policy Research Centre|url=http://www.pprc.in/|access-date=22 July 2020|archive-date=26 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726220734/http://www.pprc.in/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Thinktank">—{{cite news|url =https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html|title =BJP think tank offers online course in governance; babus to impart lessons|publisher =The New Indian Express|location =New Delhi|date =23 May 2020|website =newindianexpress.com|author =Express News Service|access-date =14 July 2020|archive-date =14 July 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200714094916/https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html|url-status =live}}
* {{cite news|url =https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|title =BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card|publisher =[[The Pioneer (India)|The Pioneer]]|quote =Public Policy Research Center (PPRC), BJP's think tank, on Monday released a comprehensive report on 100 major decisions and initiatives taken by Modi Government in first 100 days.|location =New Delhi|date =10 September 2019|website =dailypioneer.com|access-date =14 July 2020|archive-date =16 July 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200716135158/https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|url-status =live}}</ref>
| website          = {{URL|bjp.org}}
| predecessor      = [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]]<br>(1951–1977)<ref name=":4000" /><br>[[Janata Party]]<br>(1977–1980)<ref name=":4000" />
| split = [[Janata Party]]<ref name=":4000" />
|labour            = [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Need to Know BJP-led BMS is biggest labour union in India |url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=live mint |date=15 January 2008 |author=Pragya Singh |archive-date=3 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181103131425/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
| international    = [[International Democrat Union]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties|title=India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties&nbsp;— The Diplomat|first=Akhilesh|last=Pillalamarri|work=The Diplomat|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160228053454/https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties/|archive-date=28 February 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title = Members|url = https://www.idu.org/members/|publisher = [[International Democrat Union]]|access-date = 25 September 2019|website = idu.org|archive-date = 23 April 2018|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180423165945/https://www.idu.org/members/|url-status = live}}</ref><br />[[Asia Pacific Democrat Union]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|title=International Democrat Union » Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU)|work=International Democrat Union|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170616235358/http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|archive-date=16 June 2017|access-date=12 June 2017}}</ref>
| colours          = {{colour box|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} [[Saffron (color)|Saffron]]<ref>{{cite web|last=Iwanek|first=Krzysztof|date=10 September 2018|title=Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties|url=https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|access-date=5 July 2021|publisher=[[The Diplomat]]|language=en-US|archive-date=23 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623014149/https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| symbol = Lotus<br />[[File:Lotos flower symbol.svg|100px]]
| flag =BJP flag.svg
|leader=|Political position=[[Right-wing politics|Right wing]]<ref
name="bjp0right" /> to [[Far-right politics|far-right]]<ref>{{cite news
|title=Facebook accused of boosting far-right BJP in Indian elections
|url=https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/facebook-accused-of-boosting-far-right-bjp-in-indian-elections/
|access-date=9 April 2022
|work=People's World
|date=17 March 2022
|archive-date=6 April 2022
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220406211420/https://peoplesworld.org/article/facebook-accused-of-boosting-far-right-bjp-in-indian-elections/
|url-status=live
}}</ref>|peasants=[[Bharatiya Kisan Sangh]]<ref>{{cite book|last=Gupta|first=Sejuta Das|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mQiKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA172|pages=172–173|title=Class, Politics, and Agricultural Policies in Post-liberalisation India|isbn=978-1-108-41628-3|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|year=2019e|access-date=3 May 2021|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061257/https://books.google.com/books?id=mQiKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA172|url-status=live}}</ref>
}}
{{Bharatiya Janata Party sidebar}}
{{Contains special characters|Indic}}


The '''Bharatiya Janata Party''' ('''BJP'''; {{IPA-hns|bʱaːɾətiːjə dʒənətaː paːrtiː||Hindi-Bharatiya Janata Party.ogg|pronunciation}}; {{translation|Indian People's Party}}) is a political party in [[India]], and one of the two major [[List of political parties in India|Indian political parties]] alongside the [[Indian National Congress]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|title=In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress|work=The Times of India|date=19 May 2016|access-date=29 June 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171105170102/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|archive-date=5 November 2017}}</ref> Since 2014, it has been the [[List of ruling political parties by country|ruling political party in India]] under [[Narendra Modi]], the incumbent [[Prime Minister of India|Indian prime minister]].<ref name=":0">{{cite news|date=25 May 2019|title=Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303|work=Zee News|url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806|access-date=30 March 2020|archive-date=2 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190602032641/https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806|url-status=live}}</ref> The BJP is aligned with [[right-wing politics]], and its policies adhere to [[Hindutva]], a [[Hindu nationalist]] ideology.{{sfn|Banerjee|2005|p=3118}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|p=318}} It has close ideological and organisational links to the [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh]] (RSS).<ref>{{cite news|date=17 March 2019|title=Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch|work=Business Standard|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|access-date=18 March 2020|archive-date=28 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152912/https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|url-status=live}}</ref> {{As of|2023|3}}, it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the [[Parliament of India]] as well as [[State legislature (India)|state legislatures]].
After the [[1998 Indian general election|1998 general election]], the BJP-led coalition known as the [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the [[2004 Indian general election|2004 general election]], the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the [[List of chief ministers of Gujarat|chief minister of Gujarat]], led the party to a landslide victory in the [[2014 Indian general election|2014 general election]]. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected with a sole majority in the [[2019 Indian general election|2019 general election]] and with a coalition in the [[2024 Indian general election|2024 general election]]. {{as of|2025|9|post=,}} the alliance governs 20 Indian states and union territories.


The party's origins lie in the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]], which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician [[Syama Prasad Mukherjee|Shyama Prasad Mukherjee]].{{sfn|Swain|2001|p=60}} After [[The Emergency (India)|The Emergency]] of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the [[Janata Party]]; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the [[1977 Indian general election|1977 general election]]. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the [[1984 Indian general election|1984 general election]], it grew in strength on the back of the movement around [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] in [[Uttar Pradesh]]. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]], lasted for only 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}}
The official ideology of the BJP is [[Integral humanism (Hindu nationalism)|integral humanism]], first formulated by [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]] in 1965. The party advocates [[social conservatism]] and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindutva priorities, and focused on a largely [[Economic liberalisation in India|neoliberal economic policy]] that prioritised [[Globalization in India|globalisation]] and [[Economy of India|economic growth]] over [[Social security in India|social welfare]].{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} Since returning to government in 2014, the now-ruling BJP has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of [[Triple talaq in India|triple talaq]], and revoking [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|Article 370 of the Indian constitution]] (which granted autonomy to [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]]), [[Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019|abrogating its statehood]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650">{{Cite journal |last1=Bhatty |first1=Kiran |last2=Sundar |first2=Nandini |date=17 September 2020 |title=Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime |journal=International Sociology |publisher=SAGE Publications |volume=35 |issue=6 |pages=632–650 |doi=10.1177/0268580920937226 |issn=0268-5809 |s2cid=224896271}}</ref> India has experienced nationwide [[Democratic backsliding in Asia by country#India|democratic backsliding]] under the [[Premiership of Narendra Modi|BJP's rule since 2014]].<ref name="v-dem.net briefing_paper_9">{{Cite web |last1=Hindle |first1=Garry |last2=Lindberg |first2=Staffan |date=2020 |title=New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party |url=https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024234004/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2021 |access-date=9 October 2021 |publisher=V-Dem Institute}}</ref><ref name="v-dem.net Democracy Report 2021">{{citation |first1=Nazifa |last1=Alizada |first2=Rowan |last2=Cole |first3=Lisa |last3=Gastaldi |first4=Sandra |last4=Grahn |first5=Sebastian |last5=Hellmeier |first6=Palina |last6=Kolvani |first7=Jean |last7=Lachapelle |first8=Anna |last8=Lührmann |first9=Seraphine F. |last9=Maerz |first10=Shreeya |last10=Pillai |first11=Staffan I. |last11=Lindberg |date=2021 |title=Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021 |work=University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute |url=https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210914030243/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf |archive-date=14 September 2021 |pages=20–21}}</ref><ref name="The Hindu Democratic Backsliding">{{cite news |last1=Sirnate |first1=Vasundhara |date=27 November 2021 |title=The democratic backsliding of India |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-democratic-backsliding-of-india/article37696763.ece |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220830070248/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-democratic-backsliding-of-india/article37696763.ece |archive-date=30 August 2022 |work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref><ref name="Ashoka Democratic Backsliding">{{cite document |title=Democratic Backsliding in the World's Largest Democracy | last=Das |first=Sabyasachi |date=3 July 2023 |publisher=[[Ashoka University]]}}</ref>


After the [[1998 Indian general election|1998 general election]], the BJP-led coalition known as the [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the [[2004 Indian general election|2004 general election]], the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the [[List of chief ministers of Gujarat|chief minister of Gujarat]], led the party to a landslide victory in the [[2014 Indian general election|2014 general election]]. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected in the [[2019 Indian general election|2019 general election]]. {{As of|2023|06}}, the alliance governs 15 Indian states and union territories.
== Name and symbols ==


The official ideology of the BJP is [[Integral humanism (India)|integral humanism]], first formulated by [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]] in 1965. The party advocates [[social conservatism]] and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindu-nationalist priorities, and focused on a largely [[Economic liberalisation in India|liberal economic policy]] that prioritised [[Globalization in India|globalisation]] and [[Economy of India|economic growth]] over [[Social security in India|social welfare]].{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} Since returning to government in 2014, the BJP government has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of [[Triple talaq in India|triple talaq]], and revoking [[Article 370]] of the Indian constitution, which granted autonomy to [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]], and also [[The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019|abrogating its statehood]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650">{{cite journal | last1=Bhatty | first1=Kiran | last2=Sundar | first2=Nandini | title=Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime | journal=International Sociology | publisher=SAGE Publications | volume=35 | issue=6 | date=17 September 2020 | issn=0268-5809 | doi=10.1177/0268580920937226 | pages=632–650| s2cid=224896271 }}</ref> India has experienced nationwide [[Democratic backsliding by country#India|democratic backsliding]] under the [[Premiership of Narendra Modi|BJP's rule since 2014]].<ref name="auto2">{{cite web|url=https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf|last1=Hindle|first1=Garry|last2=Lindberg|first2=Staffan|publisher=V-Dem Institute|date=2020|title=New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party|access-date=9 October 2021|archive-date=24 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024234004/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="auto1">Nazifa Alizada, Rowan Cole, Lisa Gastaldi, Sandra Grahn, Sebastian Hellmeier, Palina Kolvani, Jean Lachapelle, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Shreeya Pillai, and Staffan I. Lindberg. 2021. Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210914030243/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf |date=14 September 2021 }}</ref>
The name as well as the symbol of the party were selected by the founders. The name "[[Bharat (term)|Bharat]]iya [[Janata (disambiguation)|Janata]] Party" literally translates to "Indian People's Party". The Symbol of the party is the flower [[Nelumbo nucifera|Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera)]].<ref>{{Cite web |first=Joanna |last=Banerjee-Fischer |title=What do India's political logos symbolize?|date=January 27, 2024 |url=https://www.dw.com/en/what-do-indias-political-logos-symbolize/a-68095324 |access-date=24 March 2024 |website=[[Deutsche Welle]] |language=en |archive-date=24 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240324083500/https://www.dw.com/en/what-do-indias-political-logos-symbolize/a-68095324 |url-status=live }}</ref> Lotus has a cultural significance within India as well as [[Hinduism]]. The symbol has been regarded as a symbol of peace and prosperity within Hinduism. Likewise, during the [[Indian independence movement|independence movement of India]], the symbol was used by [[Indian nationalism|Indian nationalist]] as a symbol of revolt against the [[British Raj]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Suraiya |first=Jug |title=NaMo and the lotus |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/jugglebandhi/namo-and-the-lotus/?source=app&frmapp=yes |access-date=24 March 2024 |work=[[The Times of India]] |issn=0971-8257 |archive-date=24 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240324083458/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/jugglebandhi/namo-and-the-lotus/?source=app&frmapp=yes |url-status=live }}</ref> Lotus is also recognised as the [[National symbols of India|national flower of India]]. Thus, use of the symbol gives the party a nationalist as well as Hindutva appeal.<ref name="founders">{{Cite web |title=BJP's 43 years: How it emerged from Jana Sangh and became world's largest party |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-foundation-day-journey-from-jana-sangh-modi-shah-vajpayee-advani-2356698-2023-04-06 |access-date=24 March 2024 |author=Kabool Ahmad|website=[[India Today]] |date=6 April 2023 |language=en |archive-date=2 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240102123718/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-foundation-day-journey-from-jana-sangh-modi-shah-vajpayee-advani-2356698-2023-04-06 |url-status=live }}</ref> Besides these, the party also heavily uses the [[Saffron (color)|Saffron]] colour in its promotional materials and campaigning. Similar to Lotus, the Saffron colour also has a major significance within Hinduism.<ref name=":0" /> The most common flag used by the party is predominantly saffron with a stripe of green in the left. Within the Saffron part of the flag, the lotus symbol is also integrated.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Iwanek |first=Krzysztof |title=Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties |url=https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/ |access-date=24 March 2024 |website=[[The Diplomat (magazine)|The Diplomat]] |language=en-US |archive-date=23 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623014149/https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/ |url-status=live }}</ref> This particular colour scheme used in the flag assists the party to project itself as a [[Secularism in India|secular]] party. Meanwhile, this also helps the party to maintain a religious undertone for its core electorate and [[Sangh Parivar|Hindutva supporter groups]].<ref name=":1" />


== History ==
== Precursors ==
=== Predecessors ===
=== Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77) ===
==== Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77) ====
{{multiple image
{{multiple image
| align     = right
| align             = right
| direction = vertical
| direction         = vertical
| header   = Influential figures
| header           = Influential figures
| width     = 220
| width             = 220
| image1   = Shyama_Prasad_Mukherjee_portrait_in_Parliament.jpg
| image1           = Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee.jpg
| caption1 = [[Syama Prasad Mookerjee]], founder of the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]]
| caption1         = [[Shyama Prasad Mukherjee]], founder-president of the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]]
| image2    = Atal Bihari Vajpayee tribute image (cropped).jpg
| image3           = Lkadvani.jpg
| caption2  = [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]], the first BJP [[Prime Minister of India|prime minister]] (1998–2004)
| caption3         = [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]], the last president of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh
| image3   = Lkadvani.jpg
| caption3 = [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]], [[Deputy Prime Minister of India|deputy Prime Minister]] under Vajpayee and one of the architects of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement
}}
}}
{{Main|Bharatiya Jana Sangh}}
{{Main|Bharatiya Jana Sangh}}


The BJP's origins lie in the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]], popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by [[Syama Prasad Mukherjee]] in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant [[Indian National Congress|Congress party]]. It was founded in collaboration with the [[Hindu nationalist]] volunteer organisation, the [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh]] (RSS), and was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS.{{sfn|Noorani|1978|p=216}} The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of [[Pakistan]] by the [[Indian National Congress|Congress party]] and then-Prime Minister [[Jawaharlal Nehru]]. The RSS loaned several of its leading ''[[pracharak]]s'', or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]], who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three [[Lok Sabha]] seats in the [[1952 Indian general election|first general elections in 1952]]. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=116–119}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}}
The BJP's origins lie in the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]], popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by [[Shyama Prasad Mukherjee]] in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant [[Indian National Congress|National Congress party]]. It was founded in collaboration with the [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh]] (RSS), a [[Far-right politics|far-right]] Hindutva [[Paramilitary|paramilitary organisation]]. The Jana Sangh was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS.{{sfn|Noorani|1978|p=216}} The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of [[Pakistan]] by the Congress party and then-Prime Minister [[Jawaharlal Nehru]]. The RSS loaned several of its leading ''[[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh|pracharaks]]'', or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]], who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three [[Lok Sabha]] seats in the [[1951–52 Indian general election|first general elections in 1952]]. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=116–119}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}}
 
The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] into India.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} [[Mauli Chandra Sharma]] was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of [[Integral humanism (India)|integral humanism]], which formed the official doctrine of the party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=122–126, 129–130}} Younger leaders, such as [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] and [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]] also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a [[Uniform Civil Code#Hindu Code Bill and addition to the Directive Principles|uniform civil code]], banning [[Cattle in religion and mythology#Hinduism|cow slaughter]] and abolishing the [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|special status given to Jammu and Kashmir]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=250, 352, 413}}


The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] into India.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} [[Mauli Chandra Sharma]] was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of [[Integral humanism (India)|integral humanism]], which formed the official doctrine of the party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=122–126, 129–130}} Younger leaders, such as [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] and [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]] also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a [[Uniform civil code of India|uniform civil code]], banning [[cow slaughter]] and abolishing the [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|special status given to Jammu and Kashmir]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=250, 352, 413}}
After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the [[Swatantra Party]] and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the [[Hindi Belt]], including [[Madhya Pradesh]], [[Bihar]] and [[Uttar Pradesh]]. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=427–428}}


After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the [[Swatantra Party]] and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the [[Hindi heartland]], including [[Madhya Pradesh]], [[Bihar]] and [[Uttar Pradesh]]. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=427–428}}
[[File:BJP and Predecessors - seats in the Lok Sabha updated.png|thumb|500px|The electoral history of the BJP and its predecessors in general elections]]


==== Janata Party (1977–80) ====
=== Janata Party (1977–80) ===
{{Main|Janata Party}}
{{Main|Janata Party}}
In 1975, Prime Minister [[Indira Gandhi]] imposed a [[The Emergency (India)|state of emergency]]. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the [[Socialist Party (India)|Socialist Party]], the [[Congress (O)]] and the [[Bharatiya Lok Dal]] to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}} The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with [[Morarji Desai]] as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. [[Atal Behari Vajpayee|Vajpayee]], previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the [[Minister of External Affairs (India)|Minister of External Affairs]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}}


The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist [[Christophe Jaffrelot]] wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=282–283}} The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=292–301, 312}} [[Communal violence in India|Violence between Hindus and Muslims]] increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in [[Aligarh]] and [[Jamshedpur]] in 1978–79. The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the Jana Sangh should break from the RSS, which the Jana Sangh refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the [[Janata Party (Secular)]]. The [[Premiership of Morarji Desai|Morarji Desai government]] was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing its resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=301–312}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}}
In 1975, Prime Minister [[Indira Gandhi]] imposed a [[The Emergency (India)|state of emergency]]. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the [[Socialist Party (India, 1948)|Socialist Party]], the [[Indian National Congress (Organisation)|Congress (O)]] and the [[Bharatiya Lok Dal]] to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}} The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with [[Morarji Desai]] as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee|Vajpayee]], previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the [[Minister of External Affairs (India)|Minister of External Affairs]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}}


=== BJP (1980–present) ===
The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist [[Christophe Jaffrelot]] wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=282–283}} The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=292–301, 312}} [[Religious violence in India|Violence between Hindus and Muslims]] increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in [[Aligarh]] and [[Jamshedpur]] in 1978–79.{{Citation needed|date=March 2024}} The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the former Jana Sangh members should dissociate themselves from the RSS, which they refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the [[Janata Party (Secular)]]. The [[Premiership of Morarji Desai|Morarji Desai government]] was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing Desai's resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, which is now known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=301–312}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}}
==== Formation and early days ====
 
Although the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president.<ref>{{cite web|date=7 April 2020|orig-year=7 April 1980|title=Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/|access-date=12 April 2021|website=The Indian Express|language=en|archive-date=12 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412160225/https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/|url-status=live}}</ref> Historian [[Ramachandra Guha]] writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the [[Hindu nationalist]] stance of its predecessor the Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of [[Gandhian Socialism]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} This was unsuccessful, as it won only two [[Lok Sabha]] seats in the [[1984 Indian general election|elections of 1984]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} The [[assassination of Indira Gandhi]] a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the [[Indian National Congress|Congress]] which won a record tally of 403 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=579}}
== History ==
=== Formation and early days ===
 
{{multiple image
| align            = right
| direction        = vertical
| header            = Influential figures
| width            = 220
| image1            = Atal Bihari Vajpayee (crop 2).jpg
| caption1          = [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]], the founder-president of the Bharatiya Janata Party
| image2            = L.K. Advani In 2013.jpg
| caption2          = [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]] has been the [[List of national presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|national president]] of the party in three separate occasions
}}
 
Although the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president.<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 April 2020 |orig-date=7 April 1980 |title=Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412160225/https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/ |archive-date=12 April 2021 |access-date=12 April 2021 |website=[[The Indian Express]] |language=en}}</ref> Historian [[Ramachandra Guha]] writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the Hindutva stance of its predecessor Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of [[Gandhian socialism]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} This was unsuccessful, as it won only two [[Lok Sabha]] seats in the [[1984 Indian general election|elections of 1984]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} The only two candidates of the party who won were [[A. K. Patel]] from [[Mehsana Lok Sabha constituency]] in [[Gujarat]] and [[C. Janga Reddy]] from [[Hanamkonda Lok Sabha constituency]] in [[Andhra Pradesh]].<ref name="founders" /> The [[assassination of Indira Gandhi]] a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the [[Indian National Congress|Congress]] which won a record tally of 414 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=579}}


==== Ram Janmabhoomi movement ====
==== Ram Janmabhoomi movement ====
{{Main|Ram Rath Yatra}}
{{Main|Ram Rath Yatra}}
{{Further|Ayodhya dispute|Demolition of the Babri Masjid}}
{{Further|Ayodhya dispute|Demolition of the Babri Masjid}}
[[File:Advani Yatra 1990.svg|thumb|[[Ram Rath Yatra]]]]
[[File:Advani Yatra 1990.svg|thumb|[[Ram Rath Yatra]]]]
The failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindu nationalism.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Pai|1996|pp=1170–1183}} In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] movement. In the early 1980s, the [[Vishwa Hindu Parishad]] (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a [[Ram Temple, Ayodhya|temple]] dedicated to the Hindu deity [[Rama]] at the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed site]] of the [[Babri Masjid|Babri Mosque]] in [[Ayodhya]]. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor [[Babur]] in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there.{{sfn|Jha|2003}} The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque.{{sfn|Flint|2005|p=165}} The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 [[Lok Sabha]] seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the [[National Front (India)|National Front]] government of [[V. P. Singh]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=582–598}}


In September 1990, Advani began a ''[[rath yatra]]'' (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the ''yatra'' was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim".{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=635}} Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then [[Bihar]] chief minister [[Lalu Prasad Yadav]]. A large number of ''[[kar sevak]]s'' (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several ''kar sevaks''. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh. {{sfn|Guha|2007|p=636}} The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the [[Uttar Pradesh]] assembly.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}
The failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindutva.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Pai|1996|pp=1170–1183}} In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] movement. In the early 1980s, the [[Vishva Hindu Parishad]] (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a [[Ram Mandir|temple]] dedicated to the Hindu deity [[Rama]] at the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed site]] of the [[Babri Masjid|Babri Mosque]] in [[Ayodhya]]. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor [[Babur]] in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there.{{sfn|Jha|2003}} The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque.{{sfn|Flint|2005|p=165}} The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 [[Lok Sabha]] seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the [[Third Front (India)#National Front (1989–1991)|National Front]] government of [[V. P. Singh]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=582–598}}
 
In September 1990, Advani began a ''[[Ratha Yatra|Rath Yatra]]'' (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the ''yatra'' was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim".{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=635}} Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then [[Bihar]] chief minister [[Lalu Prasad Yadav]]. A large number of ''[[Sevā|kar sevaks]]'' (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several ''kar sevaks''. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=636}} The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the [[Uttar Pradesh]] assembly.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}


On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the mosque]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition.{{sfn|NDTV|2012}}{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}}
On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the mosque]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition.{{sfn|NDTV|2012}}{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}}


A [[Liberhan Commission|2009 report]], authored by Justice [[Manmohan Singh Liberhan]], found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and [[Murli Manohar Joshi]]. The report also criticised [[Kalyan Singh]], Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} In 2020, the [[Supreme Court of India]] acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.<ref>{{Cite news|date=30 September 2020|title=All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case {{!}} Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece|access-date=12 April 2021|issn=0971-751X|archive-date=12 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412195725/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece|url-status=live}}</ref>
A [[Liberhan Commission|2009 report]], authored by Justice [[Manmohan Singh Liberhan]], found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and [[Murli Manohar Joshi]]. The report also criticised [[Kalyan Singh]], Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} In 2020, the [[Supreme Court of India]] acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.<ref>{{Cite news |date=30 September 2020 |title=All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case: Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it |language=en-IN |work=[[The Hindu]] |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece |url-status=live |access-date=12 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412195725/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece |archive-date=12 April 2021 |issn=0971-751X}}</ref>


==== NDA government (1998, 1999 - 2004) ====
Following the [[2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute|2019 Supreme Court verdict]], the [[Government of India]] announced a trust to construct the Mandir. On 22 January 2024, the [[Ram Mandir]] was officially opened.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=22 January 2024|title=Ram Temple inauguration: Advent of a new era, says PM Modi |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/others/advent-of-a-new-era-says-pm-101705947809336.html |access-date=24 January 2024 |website=[[Hindustan Times]] |language=en}}</ref> Prime Minister Narendra Modi led its consecration, claiming it to be the start of a new era.<ref name=":0" /> The temple is expected to be fully completed by September 2025.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Afzhal Khan |first=Arshad |date=9 November 2024 |title=Ayodhya's Ram temple to take 3 more months, to be completed by September 2025 |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/allahabad/ram-temple-completion-delayed-until-september-2025-due-to-stone-carver-shortage/articleshow/115095899.cms |access-date=10 February 2025 |work=[[The Times of India]] |issn=0971-8257}}</ref>
 
=== Vajpayee and Advani era (1980–2014) ===
{{further|National Democratic Alliance}}
{{further|National Democratic Alliance}}


A coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the [[Samata Party]], the [[Shiromani Akali Dal]], the [[Shiv Sena]] in addition to the [[All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam]] (AIADMK) and the [[Biju Janata Dal]]. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; [[Amartya Sen]], for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=254}} The NDA had a majority with outside support from the [[Telugu Desam Party]] (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister.{{sfn|rediff.com|1998}} However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, [[Jayalalitha]], withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.{{sfn|Outlook|2013}}
A coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the [[Samata Party]], the [[Shiromani Akali Dal]], the [[Shiv Sena (1966–2022)|Shiv Sena]] in addition to the [[All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam]] (AIADMK) and the [[Biju Janata Dal]]. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; [[Amartya Sen]], for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=254}} The NDA had a majority with outside support from the [[Telugu Desam Party]] (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister.{{sfn|rediff.com|1998}} However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, [[J. Jayalalithaa]], withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.{{sfn|Outlook|2013}}


On 13 October 1999, the NDA, without the AIADMK, won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister{{efn|in 2002}} and [[Minister for Home Affairs (India)|Home Minister]]. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror as well as [[neo-liberalism|neo-liberal]] economic policies.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In 2001, [[Bangaru Laxman]], then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in [[Operation West End|a sting operation]].{{sfn|Kattakayam|2012}}{{sfn|India Today|2001}} He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.{{sfn|Tehelka|2001}}
On 13 October 1999, without the AIADMK, the NDA won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest-ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister{{efn|in 2002}} and [[Minister of Home Affairs (India)|Home Affairs Minister]]. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror and [[Neoliberalism|neo-liberal]] economic policies.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In 2001, [[Bangaru Laxman]], then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in [[Operation West End|a sting operation]].{{sfn|Kattakayam|2012}}{{sfn|India Today|2001}} He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.{{sfn|Tehelka|2001}}


==== 2002 Gujarat violence ====
==== 2002 Gujarat violence ====
{{Main|2002 Gujarat violence}}
{{Main|2002 Gujarat violence}}
On 27 February 2002, a [[Godhra train burning|train carrying Hindu pilgrims was burned]] outside the town of [[Godhra]], killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of [[Gujarat]] that lasted several weeks.{{sfn|Ghassem-Fachandi|2012|pp=1–31}} The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}} Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}}{{sfn|Harris|2012}} The then-Gujarat chief minister [[Narendra Modi]] and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties.{{sfn|Krishnan|2012}} In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT. BJP [[Member of the Legislative Assembly (India)|MLA]] [[Maya Kodnani]], who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment;{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2014}}{{sfn|NDTV.com|2012}} she was later acquitted by the [[Gujarat High Court]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20|title=Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence|work=India Today|date=20 April 2018|access-date=6 June 2018|archive-date=29 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200229064652/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20|url-status=live}}</ref> Scholars such as [[Paul Brass]], [[Martha Nussbaum]] and [[Dipankar Gupta]] have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.{{sfn|Brass|2005|pp=385–393}}{{sfn|Gupta|2011|p=252}}{{sfn|Nussbaum|2008|p=2}}


==== General election defeats ====
On 27 February 2002, a [[Godhra train burning|train carrying Hindu pilgrims was burned]] outside the town of [[Godhra]], killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of [[Gujarat]] that lasted several weeks.{{sfn|Ghassem-Fachandi|2012|pp=1–31}} The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}} Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}}{{sfn|Harris|2012}} ''The then''-Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties.{{sfn|Krishnan|Shams|2012}} In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT, causing widespread anger and disbelief among the country's Muslim communities.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Krishnan |first1=Murali |last2=Shams |first2=Shamil |date=11 March 2012 |title=Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims |url=https://www.dw.com/en/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160117044116/https://www.dw.com/en/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |archive-date=17 January 2016 |website=[[Deutsche Welle]]}}</ref> BJP [[Member of the Legislative Assembly (India)|MLA]] [[Maya Kodnani]], who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment;{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2014}}{{sfn|NDTV.com|2012}} she was later acquitted by the [[Gujarat High Court]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=20 April 2018 |title=Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence |work=[[India Today]] |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20 |url-status=live |access-date=6 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200229064652/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20 |archive-date=29 February 2020}}</ref> Scholars such as [[Paul Brass]], [[Martha Nussbaum]] and [[Dipankar Gupta]] have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.{{sfn|Brass|2005|pp=385–393}}{{sfn|Gupta|2011|p=252}}{{sfn|Nussbaum|2008|p=2}}
Vajpayee called for [[2004 Indian general election|early elections in 2004]], six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "[[India Shining]]", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}} However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the [[Lok Sabha]], compared to the 222 of the Congress and its allies. [[Manmohan Singh]] succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the [[United Progressive Alliance]]. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2004}}
 
Vajpayee called for [[2004 Indian general election|early elections in 2004]], six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "[[India Shining]]", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}} However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the [[Lok Sabha]], compared to the 222 seats of the Congress and its allies. [[Manmohan Singh]] succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the [[United Progressive Alliance]]. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2004}}
 
In May 2008, the BJP won the [[2008 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election|state elections in Karnataka]]. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any [[South India]]n state. In the [[2009 Indian general election|2009 general elections]], its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. The election campaign would be the final for Advani as leader. The party would be led by [[Arun Jaitley]] in the Rajya Sabha and [[Sushma Swaraj]] in the Lok Sabha for the following 5 years. It lost the [[2013 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election|Karnataka assembly election]] in 2013.{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2009}}


In May 2008, the BJP won the [[2008 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election|state elections in Karnataka]]. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any [[South India]]n state. In the [[2009 Indian general election|2009 general elections]], its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. It lost the [[2013 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election|Karnataka assembly election]] in 2013.{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2009}}
=== Modi era (2014–present) ===
{{Main|Premiership of Narendra Modi}}


==== NDA government (2014–present) ====
{{multiple image
{{multiple image
| align     = right
| align             =  
| direction = vertical
| direction         = horizontal
| header   =  
| header           =  
| width     = 220
| width             = 220
| image1   = PM Modi 2015.jpg
| image1           = PM Modi 2015.jpg
| caption1 = [[Narendra Modi]], Prime Minister of India since 2014
| caption1         = [[Narendra Modi]], Prime Minister of India since 2014
| image2   = The Union Home Minister, Shri Amit Shah, in New Delhi on August 19, 2019 (cropped).jpg
| image2           = Amit Shah photographed during the first Union Cabinet Meeting of the 18th Lok Sabha (cropped).jpg
| caption2 = [[Amit Shah]] has been the longest (continuous) served [[List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National President]] of the BJP
| caption2         = [[Amit Shah]] was the [[List of national presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|national president]] of the party during 2014–2019
}}
}}
In the [[2014 Indian general election]], the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha.{{sfn|Mathew|2014}} Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th [[Prime Minister of India]] on 26 May 2014.{{sfn|Deccan Chronicle|2014}}{{sfn|BBC|May|2014}} The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament{{sfn|Times of India|2014}} and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its own strength. Support was concentrated in the [[Hindi Belt|Hindi-speaking belt]] in North-central India.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}}


Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term.{{sfn|Diwakar|2014}} The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and [[Dalit]] people, as well as among [[Other Backward Class]]es.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The BJP was also very successful at mobilising its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}}
In the [[2014 Indian general election]], the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha.{{sfn|Mathew|2014}} Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th prime minister of India on 26 May 2014.{{sfn|Deccan Chronicle|2014}}{{sfn|BBC|May|2014}} The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament{{sfn|Times of India|2014}} and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its strength. Support was concentrated in the Hindi-speaking belt in north-central India.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}}
 
Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term.{{sfn|Diwakar|2014}} The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and [[Dalit]] people, as well as among other Backward classes.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The BJP was also very successful at mobilising its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}}
 
After winning the election, the organisation of the BJP became more centralised with Modi at the helm.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sen |first=Suhit K. |title=BJP, which mocks Congress, has fallen prey to extreme centralisation |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/bjp-which-mocks-congress-has-fallen-prey-to-extreme-centralisation-2810695 |access-date=14 February 2024 |website=[[Deccan Herald]] |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214100233/https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/bjp-which-mocks-congress-has-fallen-prey-to-extreme-centralisation-2810695 |url-status=live }}</ref> People loyal to Modi were rewarded leadership positions across various states within India.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 December 2023 |title=All the PM's people: How Modi is shaping BJP organisationally, redefining 'party democracy' |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/pm-modi-bjp-narendra-modi-amit-shah-9073105/ |access-date=14 February 2024 |website=[[The Indian Express]] |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214100233/https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/pm-modi-bjp-narendra-modi-amit-shah-9073105/ |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Amit Shah]], a close confidant of Modi, was appointed as the president of the BJP in 2014.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Amit Shah's elevation as BJP President signals a generational change and Modi's complete takeover of the party |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20140728-amit-shah-elevation-bjp-president-modi-complete-takeover-of-party-804609-2014-07-17 |access-date=14 February 2024 |website=[[India Today]] |date=17 July 2014 |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214101707/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20140728-amit-shah-elevation-bjp-president-modi-complete-takeover-of-party-804609-2014-07-17 |url-status=live }}</ref> Contextually, many veteran leaders of the party like [[L. K. Advani]], [[Murli Manohar Joshi]], and [[Jaswant Singh]] amongst others were allegedly sidelined.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chaturvedi |first=Rakesh Mohan |date=22 March 2014 |title=Narendra Modi sidelines old guard in BJP; Jaswant Singh gearing up to contest from Barmer as Independent |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/narendra-modi-sidelines-old-guard-in-bjp-jaswant-singh-gearing-up-to-contest-from-barmer-as-independent/articleshow/32441833.cms |access-date=14 February 2024 |work=[[The Economic Times]] |issn=0013-0389 |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214101707/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/narendra-modi-sidelines-old-guard-in-bjp-jaswant-singh-gearing-up-to-contest-from-barmer-as-independent/articleshow/32441833.cms |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
In 2016, the BJP joined the [[International Democracy Union]], a group of various [[List of right-wing political parties|centre-right and right-wing]] political parties across the globe.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pillalamarri |first=Akhilesh |title=India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties |url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties/ |access-date=14 February 2024 |website=[[The Diplomat (magazine)|The Diplomat]] |language=en-US |archive-date=25 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225011058/https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties/ |url-status=live }}</ref> However, as of 2024, the party is no longer a member, the secretary general of the IDU, Tina Mercep, stated that they would welcome full membership of the BJP in their global network. However, the [[Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha]] remains as a member of the youth wing of the IDU.<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 February 2024 |title=Stephen Harper's Global Alliance of Conservative Parties Quietly Scrubbed India Off Its Website |url=https://pressprogress.ca/stephen-harpers-global-alliance-of-conservative-parties-quietly-scrubbed-india-off-its-website/ |access-date=14 February 2024|website=PressProgress |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214095121/https://pressprogress.ca/stephen-harpers-global-alliance-of-conservative-parties-quietly-scrubbed-india-off-its-website/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=BJP Conspicuous by Absence from Global Centre-Right Political Parties' Alliance |url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-conspicuous-by-absence-from-global-centre-right-political-parties-alliance |access-date=10 July 2024 |website=The Wire |language=en}}</ref>


In 2019, the BJP won the general election with a majority. Soon after coming to power, on 5 August 2019, the [[Second Modi ministry|Modi administration]] revoked the special status, or [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India#Autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir: Structure and limitations|limited autonomy]], granted under [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|Article 370]] of the [[Constitution of India|Indian Constitution]] to [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]]—a region administered by [[India]] as a state and this states consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of dispute among India, [[Pakistan]], and [[China]] since 1947.<ref name="britannica-jammu-kashmir">{{cite encyclopedia|last1=Akhtar|first1=Rais|last2=Kirk|first2=William|title=Jammu and Kashmir, State, India|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir|access-date=7 August 2019|url-access=subscription|quote=Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947.|archive-date=20 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820091609/https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Jan·OsmanczykOsmańczyk2003">{{cite book|last=Osmańczyk|first=Edmund Jan|author-link=Edmund Osmańczyk|editor-last=Mango|editor-first=Anthony|title=Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements|volume=2: G–M|chapter=Jammu and Kashmir.|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189|year=2003|edition=3rd|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0-415-93922-5|page=1189|quote=Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China.|access-date=16 June 2020|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061302/https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189|url-status=live}}</ref>
During Modi's first term as prime minister, the BJP expanded its presence in several states where it had previously been a minor player, and it regained power in other states where it had been in opposition for a considerable period. [[Assam]], [[Tripura]], [[Arunachal Pradesh]], [[Uttar Pradesh]], [[Bihar]], [[Haryana]], and [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] saw an increase in the BJP's influence, and the party entered government in several of these states.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Karmakar |first=Rahul |date=31 December 2018 |title=2018 was a landmark year for BJP, women in Northeast |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/2018-was-a-landmark-year-for-bjp-women-in-northeast/article25875880.ece |access-date=14 February 2024 |work=[[The Hindu]] |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X |archive-date=14 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214103448/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/2018-was-a-landmark-year-for-bjp-women-in-northeast/article25875880.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>


Later in 2019, the [[Second Modi ministry|Modi government]] introduced the [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019]], which was passed by the [[Parliament of India]] on 11 December 2019. It amended the [[Indian nationality law|Citizenship Act, 1955]] by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of [[Hindus|Hindu]], [[Sikhs|Sikh]], [[Buddhist]], [[Jain]], [[Parsis|Parsi]], or [[Christians|Christian]] religion, who had [[Religious discrimination in Pakistan|fled persecution]] from [[Pakistan]], [[Bangladesh]] and [[Afghanistan]] before December 2014.<ref name="BBC explained">[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-50670393 Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212192621/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50670393 |date=12 December 2019 }}, BBC News, 11 December 2019.</ref><ref name="PIBPassesBill">{{cite web |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=195783 |title=Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019 |website=pib.gov.in |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-date=16 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191216092712/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx%3Frelid%3D195783 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Muslim]]s from those countries were not given such eligibility.<ref name="Washington Post" /> The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under [[Indian law]].<ref name="Washington Post">{{cite news |last1=Slater |first1=Joanna |title=Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=18 December 2019 |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191218215158/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |archive-date=18 December 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|{{harvp|Sharma|2019|p=523}}: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Sen|2018|pp=10–11}}: "Nehru's response [to Patel's warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=34–35}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} A report by the [[V-Dem Institute]] described India as experiencing [[democratic backsliding]] during the [[Premiership of Narendra Modi|Modi-led BJP's rule]].<ref name="auto2"/><ref name="auto1"/>, which is often considered a notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian [[The Emergency (India)| Emergency]] years (1975-77).<ref>{{cite web |title=Interview with Indira Gandhi |url=https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |website=Interview relecast through India times |date=18 December 2016 |publisher=TV Eye |access-date=14 June 2018 |archive-date=11 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811131347/https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=29 June 2015 |title=Recalling the Emergency years |work=The Indian Express |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |access-date=14 June 2018 |archive-date=31 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200531210846/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
In 2019, the BJP won the general election with an increased majority. Soon after returning to power, on 5 August 2019, the [[Second Modi ministry|Modi administration]] revoked the special status, or [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India#Autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir: Structure and limitations|limited autonomy]], granted under [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|Article 370]] of the [[Constitution of India|Indian Constitution]] to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by [[India]] as a state. This state consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of a dispute among India, [[Pakistan]], and [[China]] since 1947.<ref name="britannica-jammu-kashmir">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Jammu and Kashmir, State, India |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] |url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir |access-date=7 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820091609/https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir |archive-date=20 August 2019 |quote=Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947. |last2=Kirk |first2=William |last1=Akhtar |first1=Rais |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Jan·OsmanczykOsmańczyk2003">{{Cite book |last=Osmańczyk |first=Edmund Jan |title=Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-415-93922-5 |editor-last=Mango |editor-first=Anthony |edition=3rd |volume=2: G–M |page=1189 |chapter=Jammu and Kashmir. |quote=Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China. |author-link=Edmund Osmańczyk |access-date=16 June 2020 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061302/https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref>
 
Later in 2019, the Modi administration introduced the [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019]], which was passed by the [[Parliament of India]] on 11 December 2019. It amended the [[Indian nationality law|Citizenship Act, 1955]] by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of [[Hindus|Hindu]], [[Sikhs|Sikh]], [[Buddhism|Buddhist]], [[Jainism|Jain]], [[Parsis|Parsi]], or [[Christians|Christian]] religion, who had [[Religious discrimination in Pakistan|fled persecution]] from Pakistan, [[Bangladesh]] and [[Afghanistan]] before December 2014.<ref name="BBC explained">[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-50670393 Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212192621/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50670393 |date=12 December 2019 }}, [[BBC News]], 11 December 2019.</ref><ref name="PIBPassesBill">{{Cite web |title=Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019 |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=195783 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191216092712/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx%3Frelid%3D195783 |archive-date=16 December 2019 |access-date=18 December 2019 |website=}}</ref> [[Muslims]] from those countries were not given such eligibility.<ref name="Washington Post" /> The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under [[Law of India|Indian law]].<ref name="Washington Post">{{Cite news |last=Slater |first=Joanna |date=18 December 2019 |title=Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191218215158/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |archive-date=18 December 2019}}</ref>{{efn|{{harvp|Sharma|2019|p=523}}: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Sen|2018|pp=10–11}}: "Nehru's response [to Patel's warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=34–35}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} A report by the [[V-Dem Institute]] described India as experiencing [[democratic backsliding]] due to the [[Premiership of Narendra Modi|Modi era]].<ref name="v-dem.net briefing_paper_9" /><ref name="v-dem.net Democracy Report 2021" /> Various other studies and media sources also cite India experiencing democratic backsliding.<ref name="Ashoka Democratic Backsliding"/><ref>{{cite document |last=Bajpaee |first=Chietigj |title=What Democratic Backsliding Means for India |date=April 2024 |publisher=[[Chatham House]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Biswas |first=Soutik |date=16 March 2021 |title='Electoral autocracy': The downgrading of India's democracy |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-56393944 |website=[[BBC]]}}</ref><ref name="The Hindu Democratic Backsliding" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Bala |first=Sumathi |date=16 May 2024 |title=Modi's strongman rule raises questions about India's 'democratic decline' as he seeks a third term |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/17/modi-strongman-rule-raises-questions-on-indias-democratic-decline.html |website=[[CNBC]]}}</ref> This is considered the most notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian [[The Emergency (India)|Emergency]] years of 1975–77.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 December 2016 |title=Interview with Indira Gandhi |url=https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811131347/https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |archive-date=11 August 2019 |access-date=14 June 2018 |website= |publisher=TV Eye}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=29 June 2015 |title=Recalling the Emergency years |work=[[The Indian Express]] |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |url-status=live |access-date=14 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200531210846/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |archive-date=31 May 2020}}</ref>


== Ideology and political positions ==
== Ideology and political positions ==
{{Conservatism in India|Parties}}
The party, throughout its history, has widely been described as a [[Right-wing politics|right-wing]],{{sfnm|1a1=Malik|1a2=Singh|1y=1992|1pp=318–336|BBC|2012|2a1=Banerjee|2y=2005|2p=3118}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mogul |first=Rhea |date=15 April 2024 |title=Narendra Modi: India's popular but controversial leader seeking a transformative third term |url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/15/india/modi-profile-india-election-intl-hnk-dst/index.html |access-date=19 May 2024 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mehrotra |first1=Karishma |last2=Shih |first2=Gerry |date=20 April 2024 |title=As India votes, women and the young could put Modi and BJP over the top |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/04/18/india-election-modi-women-youth/ |access-date=19 May 2024 |newspaper=[[Washington Post]] |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=30 October 2023 |title=Modi's Hindu Nationalist Agenda Is Corroding India's Democracy |url=https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/will-modi-hindu-nationalism-damage-us-india-relations/ |access-date=19 May 2024 |website=World Politics Review |language=en-US}}</ref> but has recently increasingly been described as [[Far-right party|far-right]].<ref name="Davies">{{Cite book |last1=Davies |first1=Peter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1-iXGKN1AK4C&q=%22Bharatiya+Janata+Party%22%22far-right%22 |title=The Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right |last2=Lynch |first2=Derek |date=16 August 2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-60952-9 |pages=103 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Gill |first=Martin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZtJ2EAAAQBAJ&q=%22Bharatiya+Janata+Party%22%22far-right%22 |title=The Handbook of Security |date=2022-06-22 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-91735-7 |pages=158 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Leidig |first1=Eviane |last2=Mudde |first2=Cas |date=9 May 2023 |title=Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): The overlooked populist radical right party |url=https://benjamins.com/catalog/jlp.22134.lei |journal=Journal of Language and Politics |language=en |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=360–377 |doi=10.1075/jlp.22134.lei |issn=1569-2159}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ammassari |first1=Sofia |last2=Fossati |first2=Diego |last3=McDonnell |first3=Duncan |title=Supporters of India's BJP: Distinctly Populist and Nativist |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/abs/supporters-of-indias-bjp-distinctly-populist-and-nativist/3D2C84D6F81E1F9CCDD89654B40AB6E8 |journal=Government and Opposition |date=2023 |language=en |volume=58 |issue=4 |pages=807–823 |doi=10.1017/gov.2022.18 |issn=0017-257X|hdl=10072/415334 |hdl-access=free |url-access=subscription }}</ref>


=== Social policies and Hindutva ===
=== Social policies and Hindutva ===
{{Conservatism sidebar}}
{{Further|Hindutva}}
{{Further|Hindutva}}
The official philosophy of the BJP is "[[Integral humanism (India)|Integral humanism]]," a philosophy first formulated by [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]] in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage."{{sfn|Hansen|1999|p=85}}{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} It is committed to [[Hindutva]], an ideology articulated by [[Indian independence movement|Indian independence]] activist [[Vinayak Damodar Savarkar]]. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over [[westernisation]], thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a Hindu nationalist party in a general sense.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}}{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}}
The official philosophy of the BJP is "[[Integral humanism (India)|Integral humanism]]", a philosophy first formulated by [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]] in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage."{{sfn|Hansen|1999|p=85}}{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} It is committed to Hindutva, an ideology articulated by [[Indian independence movement|Indian independence]] activist [[Vinayak Damodar Savarkar]]. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over [[Westernization|westernisation]], thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a [[Hindu nationalism|Hindu nationalist]] party in a general sense.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}}{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}}


The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the [[Ram Temple, Ayodhya|Ram Temple]] at the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed site]] of the [[Babri Masjid|Babri Mosque]].{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} However, the [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the mosque]] during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in a backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the [[National Council of Educational Research and Training]] (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}} Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "[[Saffronisation|saffronise]]" Indian history.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}}{{sfn|International Religious Freedom Report|2005}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2002}}{{sfn|Davies|2005}} The NDA government introduced [[Vedic astrology]] as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.{{sfn|BBC|January|2014}}
The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the [[Ram Mandir]] temple at the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed site]] of the [[Babri Masjid|Babri Mosque]].{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} However, the [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the mosque]] during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the [[National Council of Educational Research and Training]] (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}} Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "[[Saffronisation|saffronise]]" Indian history.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}}{{sfn|International Religious Freedom Report|2005}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2002}}{{sfn|Davies|2005}} The NDA government introduced [[Hindu astrology]] as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.{{sfn|BBC|January|2014}}


Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions.<ref name="Orange Evolution">{{cite news|date=2 March 2019|title=Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|url=https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190301125100/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul|archive-date=1 March 2019|access-date=27 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2014, [[Yellapragada Sudershan Rao]], who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the [[Indian Council of Historical Research]] (ICHR).<ref name="Ganguly 2014">{{cite journal|last1=Ganguly|first1=Sumit|s2cid=154421269|title=India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead|journal=[[Journal of Democracy]]|date=October 2014|volume=25|issue=4|pages=56–60|doi=10.1353/jod.2014.0077|url=https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d1972096ec288e4b0c58679a16bf66172fdb31e|access-date=30 August 2021|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061306/https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/India's-Watershed-Vote%3A-The-Risks-Ahead-Ganguly/0d1972096ec288e4b0c58679a16bf66172fdb31e|url-status=live}}</ref> Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.<ref name="Ganguly 2014" /><ref name=saffronisation>{{cite news |first=Anita |last=Joshua |title=Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate |work=[[The Hindu]] |date=16 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141202181112/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |archive-date=2 December 2014 }}</ref><ref name=right_wing>{{cite news |first=Akshaya |last=Mukul |title=Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection |work=[[The Times of India]]|date=18 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140721002055/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |archive-date=21 July 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars [[Nandini Sundar]] and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650"/> The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasizing the role of [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650"/><ref name="Bhatty 2019">{{cite encyclopedia | last=Bhatty | first = Kiran | title = School education: Denials and delusions| editor-last1 = Azad | editor-first1=Rohit | editor-last2=Chakraborty | editor-first2=Shouvik | editor-last3=Ramani | editor-first3=Srinivasan | editor-last4=Sinha | editor-first4=Dipa | encyclopedia=A quantum leap in the wrong direction? | date=2019 | isbn=978-93-5287-618-1 | oclc=1089418969 }}</ref>
Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions.<ref name="Orange Evolution">{{Cite news |date=2 March 2019 |title=Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul |newspaper=[[The Economist]] |url=https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul |url-status=live |access-date=27 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190301125100/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul |archive-date=1 March 2019}}</ref> In 2014, [[Yellapragada Sudershan Rao]], who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the [[Indian Council of Historical Research]] (ICHR).<ref name="Ganguly 2014">{{Cite journal |last=Ganguly |first=Sumit |date=October 2014 |title=India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead |journal=[[Journal of Democracy]] |volume=25 |issue=4 |pages=56–60 |doi=10.1353/jod.2014.0077 |s2cid=154421269 }}</ref> Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.<ref name="Ganguly 2014" /><ref name="saffronisation">{{Cite news |last=Joshua |first=Anita |date=16 July 2014 |title=Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate |work=[[The Hindu]] |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |url-status=live |access-date=20 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141202181112/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |archive-date=2 December 2014}}</ref><ref name="right_wing">{{Cite news |last=Mukul |first=Akshaya |date=18 July 2014 |title=Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |url-status=live |access-date=20 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140721002055/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |archive-date=21 July 2014}}</ref> Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars [[Nandini Sundar]] and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /> The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasising the role of [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /><ref name="Bhatty 2019">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=School education: Denials and delusions |encyclopedia=A quantum leap in the wrong direction? |last=Bhatty |first=Kiran |date=2019 |editor-last=Azad |editor-first=Rohit |isbn=978-93-5287-618-1 |oclc=1089418969 |editor-last2=Chakraborty |editor-first2=Shouvik |editor-last3=Ramani |editor-first3=Srinivasan |editor-last4=Sinha |editor-first4=Dipa}}</ref>


The BJP supports a [[uniform civil code]], which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505,|title=Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union|website=pib.gov.in|access-date=31 March 2021|archive-date=10 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310075212/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505,|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/article-370-rendered-toothless-article-35a-ceases-to-exist/articleshow/70535292.cms Article 370 rendered toothless, Article 35A ceases to exist] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130063447/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/article-370-rendered-toothless-article-35a-ceases-to-exist/articleshow/70535292.cms |date=30 November 2021 }}, The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf|title=The Gazette of India|access-date=6 March 2020|archive-date=5 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190805094806/http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> the abrogation of [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India]], which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its [[Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir)|accession to the Indian Union]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} It simultaneously [[The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019|abrogated Jammu and Kashmir statehood]], reorganizing it into two [[union territory|union territories]], [[Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)|Jammu and Kashmir]] and [[Ladakh]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" />
The BJP supports a [[uniform civil code]], which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505, |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310075212/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505, |archive-date=10 March 2021 |access-date=31 March 2021 |website=pib.gov.in}}</ref><ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/article-370-rendered-toothless-article-35a-ceases-to-exist/articleshow/70535292.cms Article 370 rendered toothless, Article 35A ceases to exist] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130063447/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/article-370-rendered-toothless-article-35a-ceases-to-exist/articleshow/70535292.cms |date=30 November 2021 }}, The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Gazette of India |url=http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190805094806/http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf |archive-date=5 August 2019 |access-date=6 March 2020}}</ref> the abrogation of [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India]], which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its [[Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir)|accession to the Indian Union]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} It simultaneously [[The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019|abrogated Jammu and Kashmir statehood]], dividing it into two separate [[union territory|union territories]], those being [[Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)|Jammu and Kashmir]] and [[Ladakh]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" />


The BJP opposes [[Illegal immigration in India|illegal immigration into India]] from [[Bangladesh]].{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy and stability of the country.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}}{{sfn|Ramachandran|2003}} The party later became the party of government in Assam.<ref>{{cite web|date=17 March 2021|title=Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist|url=https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/|access-date=5 May 2021|website=[[ThePrint]]|language=en-US|archive-date=18 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518010553/https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/|url-status=live}}</ref> The Modi administration passed a [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019|citizenship law]] in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for [[Religious persecution|persecuted religious]] minorities from [[Afghanistan]], [[Bangladesh]] and [[Pakistan]] who are [[Hindus]], [[Sikhs]], [[Buddhists]], [[Jain]]s, [[Parsis]] or [[Christians]].<ref name="BBC explained"/><ref name="PIBPassesBill" /> The law does not grant such eligibility to [[Muslims]].<ref name="CNNExcludes">{{cite news |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |title=India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims |first1=Helen |last1=Regan |first2=Swati |last2=Gupta |first3=Omar |last3=Khan |publisher=CNN |quote=The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries. |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-date=15 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215224043/https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="NPRExcludes">{{cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |title=India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims |publisher=NPR |first1=Sam |last1=Gringlas |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-date=15 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215032601/https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Washington Post" /> This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under [[Indian law]]: it attracted global [[criticism]], and sparked widespread [[Citizenship Amendment Act protests|protests]] that were halted by the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650"/><ref name="Washington Post"/>{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=33–50}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the [[2020 Delhi riots]], caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.<ref name="guardian-3-16-20-1">{{citation|title=Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots|last1=Ellis-Peterson|first1=Hannah|last2=Azizur Rahman|first2=Shaikh|location=Delhi|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots|date=16 March 2020|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317023019/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="NYTimes-Analysis-March1">{{citation|last1=Gettleman|first1=Jeffrey|last2=Abi-Habib|first2=Maria|title=In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse|date=1 March 2020|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html|access-date=1 March 2020|archive-date=6 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200306120958/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.<ref name=nytimes-2020-3-12-two-thirds>{{citation|title='If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims|first1=Jeffrey|last1=Gettleman|first2=Sameer|last2=Yasir|first3=Suhasini|last3=Raj|first4=Hari|last4=Kumar|others=Photographs by Loke, Atul|date=12 March 2020|access-date=13 March 2020|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html|archive-date=13 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200313011029/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-6-20-slater-1">{{citation|last1=Slater|first1=Joanna|last2=Masih|first2=Niha|date=6 March 2020|title=In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn|newspaper=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html|access-date=6 March 2020|archive-date=7 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200307070624/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-2-20-slater-1">{{citation|last1=Slater|first1=Joanna|last2=Masih|first2=Niha|date=2 March 2020|title=What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India|newspaper=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html|access-date=15 March 2020|archive-date=3 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200303203132/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=26 February 2020|title=Modi slammed as death toll in New Delhi violence rises|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/02/modi-slammed-death-toll-delhi-violence-rises-200226192504695.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114013040/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/2/26/modi-slammed-as-death-toll-in-new-delhi-violence-rises|archive-date=14 January 2021|access-date=30 November 2020|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Varadarajan|first=Siddharth|date=27 February 2020|title=Narendra Modi's Reckless Politics Brings Mob Rule to New Delhi|work=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]]|url=https://thewire.in/communalism/narendra-modi-delhi-riots-mob-violence-bjp|url-status=live|access-date=19 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112145040/https://thewire.in/communalism/narendra-modi-delhi-riots-mob-violence-bjp|archive-date=12 January 2021}}</ref>
The BJP opposes [[Illegal immigration in India|illegal immigration into India]] from [[Bangladesh]].{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy, and stability of the country.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}}{{sfn|Ramachandran|2003}} The party later formed the government in Assam.<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 March 2021 |title=Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist |url=https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518010553/https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/ |archive-date=18 May 2021 |access-date=5 May 2021 |website=[[ThePrint]] |language=en-US}}</ref> The Modi administration passed a [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019|citizenship law]] in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for [[Religious persecution|persecuted religious]] minorities from [[Afghanistan]], [[Bangladesh]] and [[Pakistan]] who are [[Hindus]], [[Sikhs]], [[Buddhists]], [[Jain]]s, [[Parsis]] or [[Christians]].<ref name="BBC explained" /><ref name="PIBPassesBill" /> The law does not grant such eligibility to [[Muslims]].<ref name="CNNExcludes">{{Cite news |last1=Regan |first1=Helen |last2=Gupta |first2=Swati |last3=Khan |first3=Omar |title=India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims |publisher=CNN |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |url-status=live |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215224043/https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |archive-date=15 December 2019 |quote=The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries.}}</ref><ref name="NPRExcludes">{{Cite news |last=Gringlas |first=Sam |title=India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims |publisher=NPR |url=https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |url-status=live |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215032601/https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |archive-date=15 December 2019}}</ref><ref name="Washington Post" /> This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under [[Indian law]]: it attracted global [[criticism]], and sparked widespread [[Citizenship Amendment Act protests|protests]] that were halted by the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /><ref name="Washington Post" />{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=33–50}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the [[2020 Delhi riots]], caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.<ref name="guardian-3-16-20-1">{{Citation |last1=Ellis-Peterson |first1=Hannah |title=Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots |date=16 March 2020 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots |work=The Guardian |access-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317023019/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots |url-status=live |place=Delhi |archive-date=17 March 2020 |last2=Azizur Rahman |first2=Shaikh}}</ref><ref name="NYTimes-Analysis-March1">{{Citation |last1=Gettleman |first1=Jeffrey |title=In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse |date=1 March 2020 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=1 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200306120958/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html |url-status=live |archive-date=6 March 2020 |last2=Abi-Habib |first2=Maria}}</ref> Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.<ref name="nytimes-2020-3-12-two-thirds">{{Citation |last1=Gettleman |first1=Jeffrey |title='If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims |date=12 March 2020 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=13 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200313011029/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html |url-status=live |others=Photographs by Loke, Atul |archive-date=13 March 2020 |last2=Yasir |first2=Sameer |last3=Raj |first3=Suhasini |last4=Kumar |first4=Hari}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-6-20-slater-1">{{Citation |last1=Slater |first1=Joanna |title=In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn |date=6 March 2020 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=6 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200307070624/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html |url-status=live |archive-date=7 March 2020 |last2=Masih |first2=Niha}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-2-20-slater-1">{{Citation |last1=Slater |first1=Joanna |title=What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India |date=2 March 2020 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |access-date=15 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200303203132/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html |url-status=live |archive-date=3 March 2020 |last2=Masih |first2=Niha}}</ref>


In 2013, the [[Supreme Court of India]] reinstated the controversial [[Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code]], which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics, including Muslim religious leaders, stated that they supported the verdict.{{sfn|Times of India|2013}}{{sfn|Buncombe|2014}} BJP president [[Rajnath Singh]] said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural,{{sfn|Ramaseshan|2013}} though the party softened the stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections.{{sfn|Business Standard|2014}} The Modi government is opposed to [[same-sex marriage]], stating in a legal affidavit that legalizing it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as ‘husband’, a biological woman as ‘wife’ and children born out of union".<ref>{{cite news|work=The Independent|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html|title=Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman'|date=25 February 2021|access-date=17 January 2023|archive-date=17 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117000847/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
In 2013, the [[Supreme Court of India]] reinstated the controversial [[Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code]], which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics largely stated that they supported the verdict.{{sfn|Times of India|2013}}{{sfn|Buncombe|2014}} BJP president [[Rajnath Singh]] said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural,{{sfn|Ramaseshan|2013}} though the party softened the public stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections.{{sfn|Business Standard|2014}} The Modi government is opposed to [[same-sex marriage]], stating in a legal affidavit that legalising it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as 'husband', a biological woman as 'wife' and children born out of union".<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 February 2021 |title=Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman' |work=The Independent |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html |url-status=live |access-date=17 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117000847/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html |archive-date=17 January 2023}}</ref>


=== Economic policies ===
=== Economic policies ===
{{Neoliberalism sidebar}}
The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh|Jana Sangh]], it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported ''[[swadeshi]]'' (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a [[protectionist]] export policy. However, it supported internal [[economic liberalisation]], and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards [[globalisation]]. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch:{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its ''swadeshi'' ideology.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}}
The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh|Jana Sangh]], it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported ''[[swadeshi]]'' (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a [[protectionist]] export policy. However, it supported internal [[economic liberalisation]], and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards [[globalisation]]. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch:{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its ''swadeshi'' ideology.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}}


Line 202: Line 258:
This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years.{{sfn|Sheela Bhatt|2014}} Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}}{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|pp=79–95}} Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}}
This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years.{{sfn|Sheela Bhatt|2014}} Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}}{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|pp=79–95}} Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}}


The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a [[neoliberal]] framework.<ref name="Ruparelia">{{cite journal|last1=Ruparelia|first1=Sanjay|date=12 January 2016|title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=755–775|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|issn=0085-6401|doi-access=free|s2cid=155182560}}</ref><ref name="Shah & Lerche">{{cite journal|last1=Shah|first1=Alpa|last2=Lerche|first2=Jens|url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html|title=India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion|journal=[[Economic & Political Weekly]]|date=10 October 2015|volume=50|issue=41|pages=33–36|access-date=18 March 2023|archive-date=28 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328113150/https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Modi liberalised India's [[foreign direct investment]] policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways.<ref name="Ruparelia" /><ref>{{cite news | url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector | work=[[The Times of India]]| title=Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways | date=7 August 2014 | access-date=27 July 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150807044440/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector | archive-date=7 August 2015 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 | work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | first=Raymond | last=Zhong | title=Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough? | date=20 November 2014 | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329123224/http://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 | archive-date=29 March 2016 | access-date=29 March 2016 | df=dmy-all }}</ref> Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them;<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> some of these proposals were dropped after protests.<ref name="ET March 2018">{{cite news |title=Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |access-date=6 February 2019 |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=14 March 2018 |archive-date=9 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209124121/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> The [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]], a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers.<ref name="Ruparelia" /> Modi has been described as taking a more economically [[populist]] approach on healthcare and agricultural policy.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind|work=[[The Nikkei]]|title=Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind|access-date=20 August 2018|archive-date=20 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180820174144/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind|url-status=live}}</ref> Modi's government has also been described as taking a more [[protectionist]] turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership]] talks<ref>{{cite news|date=15 November 2020|work=[[Times of India]]|title=Why India opted out of world's biggest today|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=14 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114124257/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa|work=[[The Nikkei|Nikkei]]|title=Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa|date=3 December 2020|quote=India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism.|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=3 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103080258/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa|url-status=live}}</ref> and introducing the 2020 [[Atmanirbhar Bharat]] economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Financial Times]]|title=Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era|date=23 November 2020|url=https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |archive-date=10 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|work=[[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]]|title=India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn|date=19 February 2020|url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=3 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303220412/https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64|url-status=live}}</ref>
The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a [[neoliberal]] framework.<ref name="Ruparelia">{{Cite journal |last=Ruparelia |first=Sanjay |date=12 January 2016 |title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India |journal=Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=755–775 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974 |issn=0085-6401 |s2cid=155182560}}</ref><ref name="Shah & Lerche">{{Cite journal |last1=Shah |first1=Alpa |last2=Lerche |first2=Jens |date=10 October 2015 |title=India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion |url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html |url-status=live |journal=[[Economic & Political Weekly]] |volume=50 |issue=41 |pages=33–36 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328113150/https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html |archive-date=28 March 2023 |access-date=18 March 2023}}</ref> Modi liberalised India's [[foreign direct investment]] policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways.<ref name="Ruparelia" /><ref>{{Cite news |date=7 August 2014 |title=Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector |url-status=dead |access-date=27 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150807044440/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector |archive-date=7 August 2015 |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Zhong |first=Raymond |date=20 November 2014 |title=Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough? |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 |url-status=live |access-date=29 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329123224/http://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 |archive-date=29 March 2016 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them;<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> some of these proposals were dropped after protests.<ref name="ET March 2018">{{Cite news |date=14 March 2018 |title=Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls |work=[[The Economic Times]] |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |url-status=live |access-date=6 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209124121/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |archive-date=9 February 2019}}</ref> The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> The [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]], a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers.<ref name="Ruparelia" /> Modi has been described as taking a more economically [[populist]] approach on healthcare and agricultural policy.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind |work=[[The Nikkei]] |url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind |url-status=live |access-date=20 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180820174144/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind |archive-date=20 August 2018}}</ref> Modi's government has also been described as taking a more protectionist turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership]] talks<ref>{{Cite news |date=15 November 2020 |title=Why India opted out of world's biggest today |work=[[Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114124257/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms |archive-date=14 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=3 December 2020 |title=Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa |work=[[The Nikkei|Nikkei]] |url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103080258/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa |archive-date=3 January 2021 |quote=India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism.}}</ref> and introducing the 2020 [[Atmanirbhar Bharat]] economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.<ref>{{Cite news |date=23 November 2020 |title=Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era |work=[[Financial Times]] |url=https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |archive-date=10 December 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=19 February 2020 |title=India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn |work=[[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]] |url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64 |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303220412/https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64 |archive-date=3 March 2021}}</ref>


=== Defence and counterterrorism ===
=== Defence and counterterrorism ===
Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the [[Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002|Prevention of Terrorism Act]], which later came under heavy criticism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States [[War on Terror]].{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}}
Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the [[Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002|Prevention of Terrorism Act]], which later came under heavy criticism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States' [[war on terror]].{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}}


Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised [[Pokhran-II]], a series of five nuclear tests in 1998.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}} The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}
Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised [[Pokhran-II]], a series of five nuclear tests in 1998.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}} The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}
Line 211: Line 267:
The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying [[Kashmir]] territory, later known as the [[Kargil War]].{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}} Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}}
The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying [[Kashmir]] territory, later known as the [[Kargil War]].{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}} Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}}


After the [[2001 Indian Parliament attack|terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament]] in December 2001, the NDA government passed the [[Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002|Prevention of Terrorism Act]].{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It initially failed to pass in the [[Rajya Sabha]]; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a [[joint session]] of the Parliament, where the numerical superior [[Lok Sabha]] allowed the bill to pass.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon [[civil liberties]], and the [[National Human Rights Commission of India]] stated that it had been used to target Muslims.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.{{sfn|Times of India|2002}}
After the [[2001 Indian Parliament attack|terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament]] in December 2001, the NDA government passed the Prevention of Terrorism Act.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It initially failed to pass in the [[Rajya Sabha]]; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a [[joint session]] of the Parliament, where the numerical superior [[Lok Sabha]] allowed the bill to pass.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon [[civil liberties]], and the [[National Human Rights Commission of India]] stated that it had been used to target Muslims.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.{{sfn|Times of India|2002}}


The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a [[2015 Indian counter-insurgency operation in Myanmar]] against the [[National Socialist Council of Nagaland]], the [[2016 Indian Line of Control strike]] in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the [[2019 Balakot airstrike]] in Pakistan.<ref>{{Cite news|work=[[The Economic Times]]|title=Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar|date=11 July 2018|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms|access-date=25 November 2020|archive-date=18 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118052537/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> It also militarily intervened in defence of [[Bhutan]] during the [[2017 Doklam standoff]] with China.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The Quint]]|title=Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered?|url=https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained|date=14 October 2017|access-date=25 November 2020|archive-date=27 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201027203809/https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained|url-status=live}}</ref>
The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a [[2015 Indian counter-insurgency operation in Myanmar]] against the [[National Socialist Council of Nagaland]], the [[2016 Indian Line of Control strike]] in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the [[2019 Balakot airstrike]] in Pakistan.<ref>{{Cite news |date=11 July 2018 |title=Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar |work=[[The Economic Times]] |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms |url-status=live |access-date=25 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118052537/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms |archive-date=18 January 2021}}</ref> It also militarily intervened in defence of [[Bhutan]] during the [[2017 Doklam standoff]] with China.<ref>{{Cite news |date=14 October 2017 |title=Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered? |work=[[The Quint]] |url=https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained |url-status=live |access-date=25 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201027203809/https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained |archive-date=27 October 2020}}</ref>


The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms.<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 May 2021 |title=The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military |first1=Anit |last1=Mukherjee |url=https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |access-date=6 November 2022 |website=War on the Rocks |language=en-US |archive-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065208/https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |date=8 April 2019 |access-date=6 November 2022 |newspaper=[[The Financial Express (India)]] |language=en |archive-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065206/https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the [[Chief of Defence Staff (India)|Chief of Defence Staff (CDS)]] to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |date=16 August 2019 |access-date=6 November 2022 |newspaper=[[India Today]] |language=en |archive-date=27 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927070751/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Department of Military Affairs]] was also established and put under the CDS.<ref>{{Cite news |date=24 December 2019 |title=Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |first1=Rahul |last1=Singh |access-date=6 November 2022 |newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]] |language=en |archive-date=3 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221003170252/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mukherjee |first=Anit |date=5 May 2021 |title=The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military |url=https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065208/https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |archive-date=6 November 2022 |access-date=6 November 2022 |website=War on the Rocks |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=8 April 2019 |title=BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways |language=en |work=[[The Financial Express (India)]] |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |url-status=live |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065206/https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |archive-date=6 November 2022}}</ref> In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the [[Chief of Defence Staff (India)|Chief of Defence Staff (CDS)]] to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War.<ref>{{Cite news |date=16 August 2019 |title=Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech |language=en |work=[[India Today]] |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |url-status=live |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927070751/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |archive-date=27 September 2019}}</ref> The [[Department of Military Affairs]] was also established and put under the CDS.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Singh |first=Rahul |date=24 December 2019 |title=Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff |language=en |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |url-status=live |access-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221003170252/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |archive-date=3 October 2022}}</ref>


=== Foreign policy ===
=== Foreign policy ===
The historical stance of the BJP towards [[foreign policy]], like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on an aggressive [[Hindu nationalism]] combined with economic protectionism.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the [[partition of India]]; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of [[Non-Aligned Movement|non-alignment]], and instead advocated closeness to the United States.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States,<ref>{{cite book|title=US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century|page=155|year=2016|first=Efraim|last=Inbar|publisher=Taylor & Francis}}</ref> while stressing a desire for a more [[Polarity (international relations)|multipolar]] world order.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The Hindu]]|title=Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar|date=19 September 2020|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=24 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124010145/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece|url-status=live}}</ref>
The historical stance of the BJP towards [[foreign policy]], like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on aggressive Hindutva combined with economic protectionism.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the [[partition of India]]; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of [[Non-Aligned Movement|non-alignment]], and instead advocated closeness to the United States.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Inbar |first=Efraim |title=US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2016 |page=155}}</ref> while stressing a desire for a more [[Polarity (international relations)|multipolar]] world order.<ref>{{Cite news |date=19 September 2020 |title=Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar |work=[[The Hindu]] |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124010145/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece |archive-date=24 November 2020}}</ref> Despite this, it has accused the [[U.S. State Department]] and "[[Deep state in the United States|deep state]]" elements in the United States of attempting to destabilise India.<ref>{{cite news|work=Reuters|date=6 December 2024|title=Modi's BJP says US State Department targeting India|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/india/modis-bjp-says-us-state-department-targeting-india-2024-12-06/}}</ref>
 
The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} Its policy also represented a significant change from the [[Jawaharlal Nehru#Foreign policy|Nehruvian idealism]] of previous governments, opting instead for realism.{{sfn|Lall|2006}} His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the [[Delhi–Lahore Bus]] service.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Vajpayee signed the [[Lahore Declaration]], which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the [[Kargil War|1999 Kargil War]]. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the [[Line of Control]] that marked the ''de facto'' border between the two countries.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak".{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil [[Agra summit]], preventing any significant deal from being reached.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}}
 
The Vajpayee government strongly opposed the 1999 [[NATO bombing of Yugoslavia]], with Vajpayee describing it as a "dance of destruction".<ref>Pradhan, Sharat. [https://www.rediff.com/news/1999/mar/29nato.htm Vajpayee condemns NATO war in Kosovo]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081118134331/https://www.rediff.com/news/1999/mar/29nato.htm |date=18 November 2008}}. ''[[Rediff]]'', 29 March 1999.</ref><ref>Faiola, Anthony. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/balkans/stories/anger051899.htm Yugoslavia Air Campaign Ignites Anti-U.S. Sentiment]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180315020414/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/balkans/stories/anger051899.htm|date=15 March 2018}}. ''[[The Washington Post]]'', 18 May 1999.</ref> The Vajpayee administration later offered political support to the U.S. [[war on terror]], in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons.{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}} However, the BJP strongly condemned the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]], stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq".<ref>{{Cite news |date=5 April 2003 |title=BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War |work=Arab News |url=https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278 |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901100757/https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278 |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref> In 2005, the BJP [[Opposition to the India–United States Civil Nuclear Agreement in India#Bharatiya Janata Party|opposed]] the [[India–United States Civil Nuclear Agreement]], which placed restrictions on India's nuclear program.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indianexpress.com/story/213652.html |title=IndianExpress.com :: Renegotiate 123: Advani gives in to pressure from party |accessdate=2008-07-11 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071215045643/http://www.indianexpress.com/story/213652.html |archivedate=December 15, 2007 }}</ref> The BJP also opposed the [[2011 military intervention in Libya]] and urged the [[Lok Sabha]] to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.<ref>{{Cite news |date=23 March 2011 |title=Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs |work=[[The Hindu]] |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901101324/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref>
 
The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with [[Nawaz Sharif]]'s government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015.<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 December 2015 |title=India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit |work=[[BBC]] |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594 |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210211014845/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594 |archive-date=11 February 2021}}</ref> Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017.<ref>{{Cite news |date=18 December 2020 |title=PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death |work=[[Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201222092117/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms |archive-date=22 December 2020}}</ref> The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy.<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 February 2019 |title=The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand? |work=Scroll.in |url=https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310074955/https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand |archive-date=10 March 2021}}</ref> In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared [[2015 Nepal blockade|blockade on Nepal]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=15 November 2015 |title=Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade |work=[[NDTV]] |url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695 |url-status=live |access-date=3 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108132725/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695 |archive-date=8 November 2020}}</ref> The Modi government expressed concern following the [[2021 Myanmar coup d'état]], but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a [[United Nations Security Council]] resolution regarding the situation there.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Martin |first=Michael |date=22 November 2021 |title=Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta |url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192530/https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta |archive-date=30 January 2023 |access-date=30 January 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Haidar |first=Suhasini |date=22 December 2022 |title=India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy |work=The Hindu |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece |url-status=live |access-date=30 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192526/https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece |archive-date=30 January 2023}}</ref> The Modi government remained neutral on the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]],<ref>{{Cite news |date=10 March 2022 |title=Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers |work=Livemint |url=https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html |url-status=live |access-date=13 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230113134704/https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html |archive-date=13 January 2023}}</ref> abstaining from [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 2623]], which condemned the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)|ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 February 2022 |title=Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China' |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref> The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.<ref>{{Cite news |date=3 March 2022 |title=Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms |url-status=live |access-date=1 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms |archive-date=1 September 2022}}</ref>
 
===Disinformation and conspiracy theories===


The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} Its policy also represented a significant change from the [[Jawaharlal Nehru#Foreign policy|Nehruvian idealism]] of previous governments, opting instead for realism.{{sfn|Lall|2006}} His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the [[Delhi–Lahore Bus]] service.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Vajpayee signed the [[Lahore Declaration]], which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the [[Kargil War|1999 Kargil War]]. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the [[Line of Control]] that marked the ''de facto'' border between the two countries.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak".{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil [[Agra summit]], preventing any significant deal from being reached. {{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}}
The BJP has frequently spread disinformation and relied on the demonisation of Muslims.<ref name="x215">{{cite web | last=Bhattacharyya | first=Indradeep | title=BJP's 2024 poll campaign is riding on disinformation and Muslim vilification | website=Alt News | date=2024-05-01 | url=https://www.altnews.in/bjps-2024-poll-campaign-is-riding-on-disinformation-and-muslim-vilification/ | access-date=2024-12-10}}</ref> The use of fake news has been a part of the party's strategy. In September 2018, [[Amit Shah]] said at a party meeting in Rajasthan that the [[BJP IT cell]] had influenced the media during the [[2017 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election|2017 Uttar Pradesh]] elections and added, "We should be capable of delivering any message to the public, whether sweet or sour, true or fake."<ref name="q786">{{cite book | last1=Jaffrelot | first1=Christophe | last2=Schoch | first2=C. | title=Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy | publisher=Princeton University Press | year=2023 | isbn=978-0-691-24790-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-fuUEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA329 | access-date=2024-12-10 | page=329}}</ref>


The Vajpayee administration also offered political support to the U.S. War on Terror, in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons.{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}} However, the BJP strongly condemned the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]], stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq".<ref>{{cite news|work=Arab News|title=BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War|url=https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278|date=5 April 2003|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=1 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901100757/https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278|url-status=live}}</ref> The BJP also opposed the [[2011 military intervention in Libya]] and urged the [[Lok Sabha]] to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The Hindu]]|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece|title=Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs|date=23 March 2011|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=1 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901101324/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece|url-status=live}}</ref>
In April 2024, the [[United States Department of State|US State Department]] criticised the BJP for promoting [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]] conspiracy theories involving [[George Soros]].<ref name="s195">{{cite web | title=US State Dept Accuses India of Anti-Semitism for Pushing Conspiracies Against George Soros | website=The Wire | date=2023-10-06 | url=https://thewire.in/government/us-state-dept-accuses-india-of-anti-semitism-for-pushing-conspiracies-against-george-soros | access-date=2024-12-10}}</ref>


The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with [[Nawaz Sharif]]'s government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015.<ref>{{cite news|date=25 December 2015|work=[[BBC]]|title=India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=11 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210211014845/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594|url-status=live}}</ref> Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Times of India]]|date=18 December 2020|title=PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=22 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201222092117/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy.<ref>{{cite news|work=Scroll.in|title=The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand?|date=26 February 2019|url=https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=10 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310074955/https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared [[2015 Nepal blockade|blockade on Nepal]].<ref>{{cite news|work=[[NDTV]]|title=Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade|date=15 November 2015|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108132725/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695|url-status=live}}</ref> The Modi government expressed concern following the [[2021 Myanmar coup d'état]], but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a [[United Nations Security Council]] resolution regarding the situation there.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta | title=Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta | date=22 November 2021 | last1=Martin | first1=Michael | access-date=30 January 2023 | archive-date=30 January 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192530/https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece | title=India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy | newspaper=The Hindu | date=22 December 2022 | last1=Haidar | first1=Suhasini | access-date=30 January 2023 | archive-date=30 January 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192526/https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece | url-status=live }}</ref> The Modi government remained neutral on the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]],<ref>{{cite news|work=Livemint|title=Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers|date=10 March 2022|url=https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html|access-date=13 January 2023|archive-date=13 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230113134704/https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html|url-status=live}}</ref> abstaining from [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 2623]], which condemned the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)|ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine]].<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Hindustan Times]]|title=Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China'|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html|date=26 February 2022|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=1 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms | title=Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions &#124; India News – Times of India | website=[[The Times of India]] | date=3 March 2022 | access-date=1 September 2022 | archive-date=1 September 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms | url-status=live }}</ref>
In December 2024, the French newspaper [[Mediapart]] condemned the BJP for falsifying its reports and added, "There are no facts available supporting the conspiracy theory promoted by BJP".<ref name="z245">{{cite web | author=The Hindu Bureau | title=BJP spreading 'fake news', says French media house Mediapart | website=The Hindu | date=2024-12-09 | url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bjp-spreading-fake-news-says-french-media-house/article68966777.ece | access-date=2024-12-10}}</ref>


== Organisation and structure ==
== Organisation and structure ==
[[File:Structure of BJP 2020 March.jpg|right|thumb|upright=1.3|A diagram of the [[Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party|structure of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]]]
{{Main|Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party}}
{{Main|Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party}}
{{Further|List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party}}


{{Further|List of national presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party}}
[[File:Structure of BJP 2020 March.jpg|right|thumb|upright=1.3|A diagram of the [[Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party|structure of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]]]
The organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the [[List of Presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|president]] being the highest authority in the party.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.{{sfn|Times of India|2012}}
The organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the [[List of Presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|president]] being the highest authority in the party.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.{{sfn|Times of India|2012}}


Below the president is the [[National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive]], which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
Below the president is the [[National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive]], which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}


In April 2015, the BJP stated that it had more than 100 million registered members, which would make it the world's largest political party by primary membership.{{sfn|First Post|2015}}<ref>{{citation |title=BJP becomes largest political party in the world |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-becomes-largest-political-party-in-the-world/articleshow/46739025.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=30 March 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161206122859/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-becomes-largest-political-party-in-the-world/articleshow/46739025.cms |archive-date=6 December 2016}}</ref> {{As of|2022|9}}, the party does not have a single Muslim representative in the parliament and state assemblies.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kuchay |first1=Bilal |title=India ruling party has no Muslim MP for the first time in history |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/6/india-ruling-party-has-no-muslim-mp-for-the-first-time-in-history |access-date=2022-09-11 |work=[[Al Jazeera]] |date=2022-07-06 |archive-date=10 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220910192832/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/6/india-ruling-party-has-no-muslim-mp-for-the-first-time-in-history |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Bhatnagar |first1=Gaurav Vivek |title=From July 7, BJP Will Have No Muslim Representatives in Parliament, Assemblies |url=https://thewire.in/government/in-one-months-time-bjp-will-have-no-muslim-representatives-in-parliament-assemblies |access-date=2022-09-11 |work=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]] |date=2022-07-07 |archive-date=10 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220910192839/https://thewire.in/government/in-one-months-time-bjp-will-have-no-muslim-representatives-in-parliament-assemblies |url-status=live }}</ref>
The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other [[Sangh Parivar]]-related organisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the Sangh Parivar:{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
 
The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other [[Sangh Parivar]]-related oragnisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the [[Sangh Parivar]]:{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
 
* The [[Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad]] (''All India Students' Union''), the students' wing of the RSS{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The [[Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad]] (''All India Students' Union''), the students' wing of the RSS{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The [[Bharatiya Kisan Sangh]] (''Indian Farmer's Union''), the farmers' division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The [[Bharatiya Kisan Sangh]] (''Indian Farmer's Union''), the farmers' division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
Line 245: Line 305:


The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as:
The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as:
* The BJP Mahila Morcha (''BJP Women's Front''), its women's division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The BJP Mahila Morcha (''BJP Women's Front''), its women's division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The [[Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha]] (''Indian People's Youth Front''), its youth wing{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The [[Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha]] (''Indian People's Youth Front''), its youth wing{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The BJP Minority Morcha (''BJP Minority Front''), its minority division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}
* The BJP Minority Morcha (''BJP Minority Front''), its minority division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}}


In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members<ref>{{Cite news |title=BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party |url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |language=en-UK |work=Sydney Morning Herald |date=2022-10-16 |accessdate=2023-07-01 |archive-date=1 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701075444/https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |language=en-IN |work=Times of India |date=2022-04-16 |accessdate=2023-07-01 |archive-date=28 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230628205517/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's [[List of largest political parties|largest political parties]].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Narendra Modi's Message to America |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |language=en-US |work=National Review |date=2022-06-23 |accessdate=2023-07-01 |quote="His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or “Indian People’s Party”) is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development." |archive-date=1 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701084716/https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-10-16 |title=BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party |language=en-UK |work=Sydney Morning Herald |url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701075444/https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |archive-date=1 July 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-04-16 |title=How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades |language=en-IN |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230628205517/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |archive-date=28 June 2023}}</ref> as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's [[List of largest political parties|largest political parties]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-06-23 |title=Narendra Modi's Message to America |language=en-US |work=National Review |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |url-status=live |access-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701084716/https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |archive-date=1 July 2023 |quote="His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or "Indian People's Party") is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development."}}</ref> In September 2024, PM Modi initiated the BJP membership drive,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bjp-membership-drive-from-september-1-usually-precedes-polls-to-elect-party-chief/article68537254.ece|title=BJP membership drive from September 1, usually precedes polls to elect party chief|date=2024-08-17|website=The Hindu|access-date=2024-09-24}}</ref> this campaign has been controversial for deceptive and coercive membership enrollment by BJP workers.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/india/madhya-pradesh/madhya-pradesh-man-claims-he-was-thrashed-for-refusing-to-become-bjp-member-4-booked-3194800|title=Madhya Pradesh: Man claims he was thrashed for refusing to become BJP member; 4 booked|website=Deccan Herald}}</ref> In Gujarat, minor school children have been enrolled as BJP members.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gujarat/bjp-membership-drive-hits-controversies-in-gujarat/article68657001.ece|first=Mahesh|last=Langa|date=2024-09-19|access-date=2024-09-24|website=The Hindu|title=BJP membership drive hits controversies in Gujarat}}</ref>


== General election results ==
== General election results ==
Line 257: Line 316:
The Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two [[Lok Sabha]] seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the [[Leader of the Opposition (India)|Opposition]] whenever the party was not in power.{{sfn|National Informatics Centre|2014}}{{efn|For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.}}
The Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two [[Lok Sabha]] seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the [[Leader of the Opposition (India)|Opposition]] whenever the party was not in power.{{sfn|National Informatics Centre|2014}}{{efn|For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.}}
{{Clear|left}}
{{Clear|left}}
[[File:Seats Won by BJP in Indian General Elections (1984–2024).png|thumb|Seats Won by BJP in Indian General Elections (1984–2024)|800px]]


=== Lok Sabha seats ===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Year
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Year
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Legislature
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Legislature
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|Party leader
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"|Party leader
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Seats won
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Seats contested
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Change in seats
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Seats won
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Percentage<br />of votes
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Change in seats
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Vote swing
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Percentage<br />of votes
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Outcome
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Vote swing
! class="unsortable" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Ref.
! style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Outcome
! class="unsortable" style="background:#f93; color:#000;"| Ref.
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[1984 Indian general election|1984]]
| [[1984 Indian general election|1984]]
| [[8th Lok Sabha]]
| [[8th Lok Sabha]]
| [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
| [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
| 229
|{{Composition bar|2|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|2|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{increase}} 2
| {{increase}} 2
| 7.74%
| 7.74%
|
| ''New''
| {{no2|Opposition}}
| {{no|Opposition}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1984}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1984}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[1989 Indian general election|1989]]
| [[1989 Indian general election|1989]]
| [[9th Lok Sabha]]
| [[9th Lok Sabha]]
|rowspan=2| [[Lal Krishna Advani]]                  
|rowspan=2| [[Lal Krishna Advani]]
| 225
|{{Composition bar|85|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|85|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{increase}} 83
| {{increase}} 83
Line 292: Line 354:
| [[1991 Indian general election|1991]]
| [[1991 Indian general election|1991]]
| [[10th Lok Sabha]]
| [[10th Lok Sabha]]
| 477
|{{Composition bar|120|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|120|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{increase}} 35
| {{increase}} 35
| 20.11%
| 20.11%
| {{increase}} 8.75%
| {{increase}} 8.75%
| {{no2|Opposition}}
| {{no2|Official Opposition}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1991}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1991}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[1996 Indian general election|1996]]
| rowspan="2"| [[1996 Indian general election|1996]]
| [[11th Lok Sabha]]
| rowspan="2"|[[11th Lok Sabha]]
|rowspan=4|[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
|rowspan=4|[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
|{{Composition bar|161|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| rowspan="2"|471
| {{increase}} 41
| rowspan="2"|{{Composition bar|161|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| 20.29%
| rowspan="2"|{{increase}} 41
| {{increase}} 0.18%
| rowspan="2"|20.29%
| {{partial|Government, later opposition}}
| rowspan="2"| {{increase}} 0.18%
| {{yes2|Coalition (1996)}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1996}}
|-
| {{no2|Official Opposition (1996–97)}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1996}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1996}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[1998 Indian general election|1998]]
| [[1998 Indian general election|1998]]
| [[12th Lok Sabha]]
| [[12th Lok Sabha]]
| 388
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{increase}} 21
| {{increase}} 21
| 25.59%
| 25.59%
| {{increase}} 5.30%
| {{increase}} 5.30%
| {{yes2|Government}}
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1998}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1998}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[1999 Indian general election|1999]]
| [[1999 Indian general election|1999]]
| [[13th Lok Sabha]]
| [[13th Lok Sabha]]
| 339
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{steady}}
| {{steady}}
| 23.75%
| 23.75%
| {{decrease}} 1.84%
| {{decrease}} 1.84%
| {{yes2|Government}}
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1999}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1999}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[2004 Indian general election|2004]]
| [[2004 Indian general election|2004]]
| [[14th Lok Sabha]]
| [[14th Lok Sabha]]
|rowspan=2|[[Lal Krishna Advani]]
| 364
|{{Composition bar|138|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|138|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{decrease}} 44
| {{decrease}} 44
| 22.16%
| 22.16%
| {{decrease}} 1.69%
| {{decrease}} 1.69%
| {{no2|Opposition}}
| {{no2|Official Opposition}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2004}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2004}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[2009 Indian general election|2009]]
| [[2009 Indian general election|2009]]
| [[15th Lok Sabha]]
| [[15th Lok Sabha]]
|[[Lal Krishna Advani]]
| 433
|{{Composition bar|116|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|116|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{decrease}} 22
| {{decrease}} 22
| 18.80%
| 18.80%
| {{decrease}} 3.36%
| {{decrease}} 3.36%
| {{no2|Opposition}}
| {{no2|Official Opposition}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2009}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2009}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[2014 Indian general election|2014]]
| [[2014 Indian general election|2014]]
| [[16th Lok Sabha]]
| [[16th Lok Sabha]]
|rowspan=2|[[Narendra Modi]]
|rowspan=3|[[Narendra Modi]]
| 428
|{{Composition bar|282|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|282|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{increase}} 166
| {{increase}} 166
| 31.34%
| 31.34%
| {{increase}} 12.54%
| {{increase}} 12.54%
| {{yes2|Government}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2014}}
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2014}}
|- style="text-align:center;"
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[2019 Indian general election|2019]]
| [[2019 Indian general election|2019]]
| [[17th Lok Sabha]]
| [[17th Lok Sabha]]
| 436
|{{Composition bar|303|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
|{{Composition bar|303|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{increase}} 21
| {{increase}} 21
| 37.46%
| 37.46%
|{{increase}} 6.12%
|{{increase}} 6.12%
| {{yes2|Government}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|<ref>{{Cite news|last=Kumar|first=Sanjay|date=28 May 2019|title=BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers|work=[[The Economic Times]]|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms|url-status=live|access-date=14 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203005824/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms|archive-date=3 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=20. Performance of National Parties|url=https://eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/|access-date=21 December 2020|website=Election Commission of India|archive-date=7 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107073533/https://eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/|url-status=live}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kumar |first=Sanjay |date=28 May 2019 |title=BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers |work=[[The Economic Times]] |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms |url-status=live |access-date=14 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203005824/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms |archive-date=3 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=20. Performance of National Parties |url=https://old.eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107073533/https://eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/ |archive-date=7 January 2021 |access-date=21 December 2020 |website=Election Commission of India}}</ref>
|- style="text-align:center;"
| [[2024 Indian general election|2024]]
| [[18th Lok Sabha]]
| 441
|{{Composition bar|240|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
| {{decrease}} 63
| 36.56%
|{{decrease}} 0.8%
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
|<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/india/india-election-modi-victory-declaration-intl-hnk|title=Modi declares victory in India elections but party faces shock losses in parliament and will need coalition|first=Rhea|last=Mogul|date=4 June 2024|website=CNN}}</ref>
|}
|}


{{as of|2023|05}}, 10 states have [[Chief minister (India)|Chief Ministers]] from the BJP, and governments led by that party, sometimes including allied parties. The 10 states are [[Arunachal Pradesh]], [[Assam]] (with [[Asom Gana Parishad]] and [[United People's Party Liberal]]), [[Goa]], [[Gujarat]], [[Haryana]] (with [[Jannayak Janta Party]]), [[Madhya Pradesh]], [[Manipur]] (with [[Naga People's Front]], [[National People's Party (India)|National People's Party]] and [[Lok Janshakti Party]]), [[Tripura]] (with [[Indigenous People's Front of Tripura]]), [[Uttar Pradesh]] (with [[Apna Dal (Sonelal)]]) and [[Uttarakhand]].
{{Vertical bar chart|1984|2|1989|85|1991|120|1996|161|1998|182|1999|182|2004|138|2009|116|2014|282|2019|303|2024|240|full_name=All time-BJP Lok Sabha seat count|type=demographic|color=orange}}


In 4 other states and in the [[union territory of Puducherry]], it participates in the government as the junior partner in the ruling alliance with other members of the [[National Democratic Alliance]]. The states are: [[Maharashtra]] (with [[Shiv Sena]], other small parties and independents), [[Meghalaya]] (with the [[National People's Party (India)|National People's Party]], [[United Democratic Party (Meghalaya)|United Democratic Party]], [[People's Democratic Front (Meghalaya)|People's Democratic Front]] and [[Hill State People's Democratic Party]]), [[Nagaland]] (with the [[Nationalist Democratic Progressive Party]]), and [[Puducherry (union territory)|Puducherry]] (with the [[All India N.R. Congress]]). The BJP's ally, the [[Sikkim Krantikari Morcha]], holds power in [[Sikkim]], but the BJP has no ministers in the government.
== Presence in states and Union Territories ==


The BJP has previously held power in [[Karnataka]], [[Chhattisgarh]], [[Delhi]], [[Rajasthan]] and [[Jharkhand]], and has been the junior coalition partner in governments in [[Andhra Pradesh]] (with the [[Telugu Desam Party]]), [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] (with the [[Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party]]), [[Odisha]] (with the [[Biju Janata Dal]]), [[Punjab, India|Punjab]] (with the [[Shiromani Akali Dal]]), and [[Tamil Nadu]] (with the [[All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam]]). It has never held power in [[Kerala]], [[Telangana]], and [[West Bengal]].
[[File:BJP presence by states & union territories.svg|thumb]]


In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the [[North-East Democratic Alliance]].<ref name="auto">{{cite web |last=Pisharoty |first=Sangeeta Barooah |date=25 May 2016 |title=BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt' |url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526113451/http://thewire.in/2016/05/25/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt-38680/ |archive-date=26 May 2016 |website=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]]}}</ref><ref name="hindustantimes.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html|title=Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance|date=25 May 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526061921/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html|archive-date=26 May 2016}}</ref><ref name="ndtv.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824|title=BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160525135628/http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824|archive-date=25 May 2016}}</ref>
The BJP has previously held power in [[Karnataka]], [[Jharkhand]] and [[Himachal Pradesh]]. Also it has been the junior coalition partner in governments in [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] (with the [[Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party]]), [[Punjab, India|Punjab]] (with the [[Shiromani Akali Dal]]), and [[Tamil Nadu]] (with the [[All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam]]). It has never held power in [[Kerala]], [[Telangana]], and [[West Bengal]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/kerala-the-ever-elusive-state-for-the-bjp/article65946291.ece|title=Kerala: the ever-elusive State for the BJP|first=Biju|last=Govind|work=The Hindu |date=28 September 2022|via=www.thehindu.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/not-happening-bjp-won-t-rule-kerala-feels-party-mla-o-rajagopal-1449228-2019-02-06|title=Not happening: BJP won't rule Kerala, feels party's only MLA from the state|first=P. S. Gopikrishnan|last=Unnithan|date=6 February 2019|website=India Today}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/bjp-will-not-win-in-bengal-by-insulting-bengalis-cm-mamata-banerjee/articleshow/123709689.cms|title=BJP will not win in Bengal by insulting Bengalis: CM Mamata Banerjee|work=The Times of India |date=5 September 2025|via=The Economic Times - The Times of India}}</ref>


=== Current seats in State Legislative Assemblies ===
In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the [[North-East Democratic Alliance]].<ref name="thewire.in-25May16">{{Cite web |last=Pisharoty |first=Sangeeta Barooah |date=25 May 2016 |title=BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt' |url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526113451/http://thewire.in/2016/05/25/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt-38680/ |archive-date=26 May 2016 |website=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]]}}</ref><ref name="hindustantimes.com">{{Cite web |date=25 May 2016 |title=Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance |work=Hindustan Times |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526061921/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html |archive-date=26 May 2016}}</ref><ref name="ndtv.com">{{Cite web |title=BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge |url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160525135628/http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824 |archive-date=25 May 2016}}</ref>


{{hidden|Legislative Assembly|[[Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|0|175|hex=#FF9933}}
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;"
[[Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|49|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[Assam Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|63|126|hex=#FF9933}}
!Legislature
[[Bihar Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|78|243|hex=#FF9933}}
!Seats
[[Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|14|90|hex=#FF9933}}
!Legislative leader
[[Delhi Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|8|70|hex=#FF9933}}
!Status
[[Goa Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|28|40|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[Gujarat Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|156|182|hex=#FF9933}}
!Colspan=4|Upper House                       
[[Haryana Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|41|90|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|25|68|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Rajya Sabha]]
[[Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|0|90|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{Composition bar|103|245|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}}
[[Jharkhand Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|26|81|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[J. P. Nadda]]
[[Karnataka Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|66|224|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{yes2|Government}}
[[Kerala Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|0|140|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|130|230|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council|Andhra Pradesh]]
[[Maharashtra Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|105|288|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{Composition bar|1|58|hex=#FF9933}}
[[Manipur Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|37|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Somu Veerraju]]
[[Meghalaya Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|2|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
[[Mizoram Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|1|40|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[Nagaland Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|12|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Bihar Legislative Council|Bihar]]
[[Odisha Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|22|147|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{Composition bar|22|75|hex=#FF9933}}
[[Puducherry Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|6|30|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Hari Sahni]]
[[Punjab Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|2|117|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{yes2|Government}}
[[Rajasthan Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|70|200|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[Sikkim Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|12|32|hex=#FF9933}}
|
[[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|4|234|hex=#FF9933}}
[[Karnataka Legislative Council|Karnataka]]
[[Telangana Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|3|119|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{Composition bar|30|75|hex=#FF9933}}
[[Tripura Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|31|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Chalavadi Narayanaswamy]]
[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|255|403|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{no2|Opposition}}
[[Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|47|70|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[West Bengal Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|70|294|hex=#FF9933}}|headerstyle=background-color:#ccccff|style=text-align:center;}}
|
 
[[Maharashtra Legislative Council|Maharashtra]]
=== Current seats in State Legislative councils ===
|{{Composition bar|22|78|hex=#FF9933}}
{{hidden|Legislative Council|[[Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|0|58|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Pravin Darekar]]
[[Bihar Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|24|75|hex=#FF9933}}
|{{yes2|Government}}
[[Karnataka Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|35|75|hex=#FF9933}}
|-
[[Maharashtra Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|22|78|hex=#FF9933}}
|
[[Telangana Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|1|40|hex=#FF9933}}
[[Telangana Legislative Council|Telangana]]
[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|82|100|hex=#FF9933}}|headerstyle=background-color:#ccccff|style=text-align:center;}}
|{{Composition bar|3|40|hex=#FF9933}}
 
|A.Venkata Narayana Reddy
== List of prime ministers ==
|{{partial|Others}}
{{further|List of prime ministers of India}}
|-
{| class="wikitable"
|
[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council|Uttar Pradesh]]
|{{Composition bar|79|100|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Keshav Prasad Maurya]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
!Colspan=4|Lower House
|-
|[[Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Andhra Pradesh]]
|{{Composition bar|8|175|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Penmetsa Vishnu Kumar Raju]]
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
|-
|[[Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Arunachal Pradesh]]
|{{Composition bar|46|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Pema Khandu]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|[[Assam Legislative Assembly|Assam]]
|{{Composition bar|64|126|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Himanta Biswa Sarma]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|[[Bihar Legislative Assembly|Bihar]]
|{{Composition bar|89|243|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Samrat Choudhary]]
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
|-
|[[Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly|Chhattisgarh]]
|{{Composition bar|54|90|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Vishnu Deo Sai]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|[[Goa Legislative Assembly|Goa]]
|{{Composition bar|27|40|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Pramod Sawant]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|[[Gujarat Legislative Assembly|Gujarat]]
|{{Composition bar|162|182|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Bhupendrabhai Patel]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|[[Haryana Legislative Assembly|Haryana]]
|{{Composition bar|48|90|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Nayab Singh Saini]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Himachal Pradesh]]
|{{Composition bar|28|68|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Jai Ram Thakur]]
|{{no2|Opposition}}
|-
|
[[Jharkhand Legislative Assembly|Jharkhand]]
|{{Composition bar|21|81|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Babulal Marandi]]
|{{no2|Opposition}}
|-
|
[[Karnataka Legislative Assembly|Karnataka]]
|{{Composition bar|63|224|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[R. Ashoka]]
|{{no2|Opposition}}
|-
|
[[Kerala Legislative Assembly|Kerala]]
|{{Composition bar|0|140|hex=#FF9933}}
|Colspan=2 Bgcolor=#CDCDCD|No Representation
|-
|
[[Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Madhya Pradesh]]
|{{Composition bar|165|230|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Mohan Yadav]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Maharashtra Legislative Assembly|Maharashtra]]
|{{Composition bar|131|288|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Devendra Fadnavis]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Manipur Legislative Assembly|Manipur]]
|{{Composition bar|37|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Y. Khemchand Singh]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Meghalaya Legislative Assembly|Meghalaya]]
|{{Composition bar|2|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Sanbor Shullai]]
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
|-
|
[[Mizoram Legislative Assembly|Mizoram]]
|{{Composition bar|2|40|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[K. Beichhua]]
|{{partial|Others}}
|-
|
[[Nagaland Legislative Assembly|Nagaland]]
|{{Composition bar|11|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Y. Patton]]
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
|-
|
[[Odisha Legislative Assembly|Odisha]]
|{{Composition bar|79|147|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Mohan Charan Majhi]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Punjab Legislative Assembly|Punjab]]
|{{Composition bar|2|117|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Ashwani Kumar Sharma (Punjab politician)|Ashwani Kumar Sharma]]
|{{partial|Others}}
|-
|
[[Rajasthan Legislative Assembly|Rajasthan]]
|{{Composition bar|118|200|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Bhajan Lal Sharma]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Sikkim Legislative Assembly|Sikkim]]
|{{Composition bar|0|32|hex=#FF9933}}
|Bgcolor=#CDCDCD|No Representation
|{{yes2|Alliance}}
|-
|
[[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly|Tamil Nadu]]
|{{Composition bar|4|234|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Nainar Nagendran]]
|{{no2|Opposition}}
|-
|
[[Telangana Legislative Assembly|Telangana]]
|{{Composition bar|8|119|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Alleti Maheshwar Reddy]]
|{{partial|Others}}
|-
|
[[Tripura Legislative Assembly|Tripura]]
|{{Composition bar|33|60|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Manik Saha]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Uttar Pradesh]]
|{{Composition bar|257|403|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Yogi Adityanath]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|
[[Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly|Uttarakhand]]
|{{Composition bar|47|70|hex=#FF9933}}
|[[Pushkar Singh Dhami]]
|{{yes2|Government}}
|-
|-
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| No
|
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Portrait
[[West Bengal Legislative Assembly|West Bengal]]
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Prime minister
|{{Composition bar|65|294|hex=#FF9933}}
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Constituency
|[[Suvendu Adhikari]]
! colspan="3" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Term in office
|{{no2|Opposition}}
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Lok Sabha
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Cabinet
|-
|-
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Start
|[[Delhi Legislative Assembly|Delhi]]
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| End
|{{Composition bar|48|70|hex=#FF9933}}
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Tenure
|[[Rekha Gupta]]
|- style="text-align: center;"
|{{yes2|Government}}
| rowspan="3" |1
|-            
| rowspan="3" |[[File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee tribute image (cropped).jpg|100px]]
|
| rowspan="3" |[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
[[Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly|Jammu and Kashmir]]
| rowspan ="3" |[[Lucknow (Lok Sabha constituency)|Lucknow]]
|{{Composition bar|29|90|hex=#FF9933}}
| 16 May 1996
|[[Sunil Kumar Sharma (Jammu and Kashmir)|Sunil Kumar Sharma]]
| 1 June 1996
|{{no2|Opposition}}
| rowspan="3" |6 years, 80 days
|-            
| [[11th Lok Sabha|11th]]
|
| [[First Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee I]]
[[Puducherry Legislative Assembly|Puducherry]]
|- style="text-align: center;"
|{{Composition bar|9|33|hex=#FF9933}}
| rowspan="2" |19 March 1998
|[[A. Namassivayam]]
| rowspan="2" |22 May 2004
|{{yes2|Coalition}}
| [[12th Lok Sabha|12th]]
|-                
| [[Second Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee II]]
|- style="text-align: center;"
| [[13th Lok Sabha|13th]]
| [[Third Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee III]]
|- style="text-align: center;"
| rowspan="2" |2
| rowspan="2" |[[File:Official Photograph of Prime Minister Narendra Modi Potrait.png|100px]]
| rowspan="2" |[[Narendra Modi]]
| rowspan="2" |[[Varanasi (Lok Sabha constituency)|Varanasi]]
| rowspan="2" |26 May 2014
| rowspan="2" |'''''Incumbent'''''
| rowspan="2" | {{age in years and days|2014|5|26}}
|[[16th Lok Sabha|16th]]
| [[First Modi ministry|Modi I]]
|- style="text-align: center;"
| [[17th Lok Sabha|17th]]
| [[Second Modi ministry|Modi II]]
|}
|}


== List of deputy prime ministers ==
== List of heads of government ==
{{see|Deputy Prime Minister of India}}
=== List of prime ministers ===
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;"
{{further|List of prime ministers of India}}
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;"
|-
|-
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| No.
!rowspan="2"|No.
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Portrait
!rowspan="2"|Portrait
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Deputy PM
!rowspan="2"|Prime minister
! colspan="3" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Term in office
!rowspan="2"|Constituency
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Lok Sabha
!colspan="3"|Term in office
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Prime Minister
!rowspan="2"|Lok Sabha
!rowspan="2"|Cabinet
|-
|-
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Start
!Start
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| End
!End
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Tenure
!Tenure
|-
|-
|1
!rowspan="3"|[[Premiership of Atal Bihari Vajpayee|1]]
|[[File:Lkadvani.jpg|80px]]
|rowspan="3"|[[File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee tribute image (cropped).jpg|100px]]
|[[Lal Krishna Advani]]
|rowspan="3"|[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
|{{dts|29 June 2002}}
|rowspan="3"|[[Lucknow (Lok Sabha constituency)|Lucknow]]
|{{dts|22 May 2004}}
|16 May 1996
|1 year, 328 days
|1 June 1996
|{{ayd|16 May 1996|1 June 1996}}
|[[11th Lok Sabha|11th]]
|[[First Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee I]]
|-
|19 March 1998
|13 October 1999
|rowspan="2"|{{ayd|19 March 1998|22 May 2004}}
|[[12th Lok Sabha|12th]]
|[[Second Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee II]]                   
|-                                 
| 14 October 1999               
|22 May 2004
|[[13th Lok Sabha|13th]]
|[[13th Lok Sabha|13th]]
|[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]]
|[[Third Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee III]]
|-
! rowspan="3" |[[Premiership of Narendra Modi|2]]
| rowspan="3" |[[File:The official portrait of Shri Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of the Republic of India.jpg|100px]]
| rowspan="3" |[[Narendra Modi]]
| rowspan="3" |[[Varanasi (Lok Sabha constituency)|Varanasi]]
|26 May 2014
|30 May 2019
| rowspan="3" |{{age in years and days|2014|5|26}}
| [[16th Lok Sabha|16th]]
| [[First Modi ministry|Modi I]]
|- style="vertical-align: middle; text-align: center;"
| 30 May 2019
| 9 June 2024
| [[17th Lok Sabha|17th]]
| [[Second Modi ministry|Modi II]]
|- style="vertical-align: middle; text-align: center;"
| 9 June 2024
| ''Incumbent''
| [[18th Lok Sabha|18th]]
|  [[Third Modi ministry|Modi III]]
|}
|}


== List of current chief ministers ==
=== List of incumbent chief ministers ===
[[File:BJP CM History 2025 As Delhi election.png|400px|right]]
{{Main|List of chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party}}
{{Main|List of chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party}}
{{As of|2022|5}}, 49 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 11 of whom are incumbent.


{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
{{As of|2025|02|22}}, 55 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 14 of whom are incumbent.
|+'''Incumbent chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party'''
 
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|No
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|State
|+Incumbent Chief Ministers from the BJP
! style="background:#f93; color:white;" |Portrait
!No.
! style="background:#f93; color:white;" |Name
!State
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|Cabinet
!Portrait
! style="background:#f93; color:white;" colspan="2"|Governing coalition
!Name
!Cabinet
!colspan="2"|Governing coalition
|-
|-
|Rowspan=2|1
!1
|Rowspan=2|[[Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Arunachal Pradesh]]
|[[Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Arunachal Pradesh]]
| rowspan="2" |[[File:Pema Khandu in July 2016.jpg|80px|border]]
|[[File:Pema Khandu in July 2016.jpg|80px|border]]
| rowspan="2" |[[Pema Khandu]]
|[[Pema Khandu]]
|Rowspan=2|[[Second Pema Khandu ministry|Khandu II]]
|[[Fifth Pema Khandu ministry|Khandu V]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP  
|BJP
|-
| style="background:#db7093;"|
|[[National People's Party (India)|NPP]]
|-
|-
|Rowspan=3| 2
!rowspan="4"|2
|Rowspan=3|[[Assam Legislative Assembly|Assam]]
|rowspan="4"|[[Assam Legislative Assembly|Assam]]
| rowspan="3" |[[File:Himanta Biswa Sarma with PM Narendra Modi Cropped.jpg|80px|border]]
|rowspan="4"|[[File:Himanta Biswa Sarma (cropped).jpg|103x103px]]
| rowspan="3" |[[Himanta Biswa Sarma]]
|rowspan="4"|[[Himanta Biswa Sarma]]
|Rowspan=3|[[Sarma ministry|Sarma]]
|Rowspan=4|[[Sarma ministry|Sarma I]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#9cf;"|
|{{Party color cell|Asom Gana Parishad}}
|[[Asom Gana Parishad|AGP]]
|[[Asom Gana Parishad|AGP]]
|-
|-
| style="background:#f3ed13;"|
|{{Party color cell|United People's Party Liberal}}
|[[United People's Party Liberal|UPPL]]  
|[[United People's Party Liberal|UPPL]]
|-
|{{Party color cell|Bodoland People's Front}}
|[[Bodoland People's Front|BPF]]
|-
|-
|Rowspan=3| 3
!3
|Rowspan=3|[[Goa Legislative Assembly|Goa]]
|[[Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly|Chhattisgarh]]
| rowspan="3" |[[File:The Chief Minister of Goa, Shri Pramod Sawant.jpg|80px|border]]
|[[File:Vishnu Deo Sai, Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh.jpg|100x100px]]
| rowspan="3" |[[Pramod Sawant]]
|[[Vishnu Deo Sai]]
|Rowspan=3|[[Second Pramod Sawant ministry|Sawant II]]
|[[Vishnudeo Sai ministry|Sai I]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#93c;"|
!rowspan="3"|4
|rowspan="3"|[[Goa Legislative Assembly|Goa]]
|rowspan="3"|[[File:The Chief Minister of Goa, Shri Pramod Sawant.jpg|103x103px]]
|rowspan="3"|[[Pramod Sawant]]
|rowspan="3"|[[Second Pramod Sawant ministry|Sawant II]]
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|-
|{{Party color cell|Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party}}
|[[Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party|MGP]]
|[[Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party|MGP]]
|-
|-
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"|
|bgcolor=CDCDCD|
|[[Independent politician|IND]]
|[[Independent politician|IND]]
|-
|-
| 4
!5
|[[Gujarat Legislative Assembly|Gujarat]]
|[[Gujarat Legislative Assembly|Gujarat]]
|[[File:Bhupendrabhai Patel accompanies Narendra Modi at Rajkot (cropped).jpg|80px|border]]
|[[File:Chief Minister of Gujarat, Shri Bhupendra Patel (2).jpg|80px|border]]
|[[Bhupendrabhai Patel]]
|[[Bhupendrabhai Patel]]
|[[First Bhupendrabhai Patel ministry|Patel II]]
|[[Second Bhupendrabhai Patel ministry|Patel II]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|-
!6
|[[Haryana Legislative Assembly|Haryana]]
|[[File:Nayab Singh Saini 2018.jpg|80px|border]]
|[[Nayab Singh Saini]]
|[[Second Saini ministry|Saini II]]
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
|Rowspan=4| 5
!7
|Rowspan=4|[[Haryana Legislative Assembly|Haryana]]
|[[Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Madhya Pradesh]]
| rowspan="4" |[[File:Manohar Lal Khattar 2015.jpg|80px|border]]
|[[File:Prime Minister Modi meets Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh (cropped).jpg|106x106px]]
| rowspan="4" |[[Manohar Lal Khattar]]
|[[Mohan Yadav]]
|Rowspan=4|[[Second Khattar ministry|Khattar II]]
|[[Mohan Yadav ministry|Yadav I]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#026d37;"|
!rowspan="8"|[[Chief ministership of Devendra Fadnavis|8]]
| [[Jannayak Janata Party|JJP]]
|rowspan="8"|[[Maharashtra Legislative Assembly|Maharashtra]]
|rowspan="8"|[[File:Eknath Shinde and Devendra Fadnavis with PM Narendra Modi Cropped(2).jpg|105x105px]]
|rowspan="8"|[[Devendra Fadnavis]]
|rowspan="8"|[[Third Fadnavis ministry|Fadnavis III]]
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#0093ed;"|
|{{Party color cell|Shiv Sena (2022-present)}}
|[[Haryana Lokhit Party|HLP]]
|[[Shiv Sena (2022-present)|SHS]]
|-
|-
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"|
|{{Party color cell|Nationalist Congress Party (pre–2023)}}
|[[Independent politician|IND]]
|[[Nationalist Congress Party|NCP]]
|-
|bgcolor=#CB00F1|
|JSS
|-
| bgcolor=#FFFF00|
|[[Rashtriya Samaj Paksha|RSP]]
|-
| bgcolor=#1A34BB|
|RYSP
|-
|-
|Rowspan=2| 6
| bgcolor=#F58E7D|
|Rowspan=2|[[Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Madhya Pradesh]]
|RSVA
| rowspan="2" |[[File:Shivraj Singh Chauhan (cropped 2).jpg|108x108px]]
| rowspan="2" |[[Shivraj Singh Chouhan]]
|Rowspan=2|[[Fourth Chouhan ministry|Chouhan IV]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"|
| bgcolor=#CDCDCD|
|[[Independent politician|IND]]
| [[Independent (politician)|IND]]
|-
|-
|Rowspan=5| 7
!rowspan="4"|9
|Rowspan=5|[[Manipur Legislative Assembly|Manipur]]
|rowspan="4"|[[Manipur Legislative Assembly|Manipur]]
| rowspan="5" |[[File:N. Biren Singh.jpg|80px|border]]
|rowspan="4"|-
| rowspan="5" |[[N. Biren Singh]]
|rowspan="4"|[[Yumnam Khemchand Singh]]
|Rowspan=5|[[Second N. Biren Singh ministry|Singh II]]
|Rowspan=4|[[Yumnam Khemchand Singh ministry]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#DB7093|
|style="background:#DB7093|
|[[National People's Party (India)|NPP]]
|[[National People's Party (India)|NPP]]
|-
|-
| style="background:#906;"|
|style="background:#906;"|
|[[Naga People's Front|NPF]]
|[[Naga People's Front|NPF]]
|-
|-
| style="background:#f00;"|
|style="background:#CDCDCD;"|
|[[Kuki People's Alliance|KPA]]
|[[Independent politician|IND]]
|-
|-
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"|
!10
|[[Independent politician|IND]]
|[[Odisha Legislative Assembly|Odisha]]
|[[File:Mohan Charan Majhi (2024 Image) (3x4 cropped).jpg|107x107px]]
|[[Mohan Charan Majhi]]
|[[Mohan Charan Majhi ministry|Majhi I]]
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|-
!11
|[[Rajasthan Legislative Assembly|Rajasthan]]
|[[File:Bhajan Lal Sharma.jpg|80px|border]]
|[[Bhajan Lal Sharma]]
|[[Bhajan Lal Sharma ministry|Sharma I]]
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|-
|-
|Rowspan=2| 8
!rowspan="3"|12
|Rowspan=2|[[Tripura Legislative Assembly|Tripura]]
|rowspan="3"|[[Tripura Legislative Assembly|Tripura]]
| rowspan="2" | [[File:Manik Saha Invitation for HWC 2023.jpg|80px|border]]
|rowspan="3"|[[File:Manik Saha Invitation for HWC 2023.jpg|80px|border]]
| rowspan="2" |[[Manik Saha]]
|rowspan="3"|[[Manik Saha]]
|Rowspan=2| [[Second Saha ministry|Saha II]]
|rowspan="3"|[[Second Saha ministry|Saha II]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:green;"|
|{{Party color cell|Tipra Motha Party}}
|[[Tipra Motha Party|TMP]]
|-
|style="background:green;"|
|[[Indigenous People's Front of Tripura|IPFT]]
|[[Indigenous People's Front of Tripura|IPFT]]
|-
|-
|Rowspan=3| 9
!Rowspan="4"|13
|Rowspan=3|[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Uttar Pradesh]]
|rowspan="4"|[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Uttar Pradesh]]
| rowspan="3" |[[File:Yogi Adityanath.jpg|107x107px]]
|rowspan="4"|[[File:The Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, Shri Yogi Adityanath in New Delhi on February 10, 2018 (cropped).jpg|124x124px]]
| rowspan="3" |[[Yogi Adityanath]]
|rowspan="4"|[[Yogi Adityanath]]
|Rowspan=3|[[Second Yogi Adityanath ministry|Adityanath II]]
|Rowspan=4|[[Second Yogi Adityanath ministry|Adityanath II]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#306;"|
|style="background:#306;"|
|[[Apna Dal (Sonelal)|AD(S)]]
|[[Apna Dal (Sonelal)|AD(S)]]
|-
|-
| style="background:#b80000;"|
|style="background:green"|
|[[Rashtriya Lok Dal|RLD]]
|-
|style="background:#b80000;"|
|[[NISHAD Party|NP]]
|[[NISHAD Party|NP]]
|-
|-
|Rowspan=2| 10
!14
|Rowspan=2| [[Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly|Uttarakhand]]
|[[Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly|Uttarakhand]]
| rowspan="2" | [[File:Pushkar Dhami.jpg|80px]]
|[[File:Pushkar Dhami.jpg|80px]]
| rowspan="2" | [[Pushkar Singh Dhami]]
|[[Pushkar Singh Dhami]]
|Rowspan=2| [[Second Dhami ministry|Dhami II]]
|[[Second Dhami ministry|Dhami II]]
| style="background:#f93;"|
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|BJP
|-
|-
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"|
!15
|[[Independent politician|IND]]
|[[Delhi Legislative Assembly|Delhi]]
| [[File:Chief Minister of Delhi, Smt. Rekha Gupta.jpg|80px|border]]
|[[Rekha Gupta]]
|[[Rekha Gupta ministry|Gupta]]
|{{Party color cell|Bharatiya Janata Party}}
|BJP
|}
|}


Line 638: Line 946:
* [[Leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Parliament of India]]
* [[Leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Parliament of India]]
* [[List of political parties in India]]
* [[List of political parties in India]]
* [[List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]
* [[List of national presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]
* [[List of state presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]
* [[List of state presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]
* [[Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]
* [[Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]
Line 655: Line 963:
{{Refbegin|30em}}
{{Refbegin|30em}}
<!-- ToDo: Re-organize A->Z by last names -->
<!-- ToDo: Re-organize A->Z by last names -->
* {{citation |last1=Sharma |first1=Chetna |title=Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016: Continuities and contestations with special reference to politics in Assam, India |journal=Asian Ethnicity |volume=20 |issue=4 |year=2019 |pages=522–540 |doi=10.1080/14631369.2019.1601993|s2cid=150837053 }}
* {{Citation |last=Sharma |first=Chetna |title=Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016: Continuities and contestations with special reference to politics in Assam, India |journal=Asian Ethnicity |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=522–540 |year=2019 |doi=10.1080/14631369.2019.1601993 |s2cid=150837053}}
* {{citation |last1=Sen |first1=Uditi |title=Citizen Refugee: Forging the Indian Nation after Partition |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |year=2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-42561-2 |access-date=16 June 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061242/https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |url-status=live }}
* {{Citation |last=Sen |first=Uditi |title=Citizen Refugee: Forging the Indian Nation after Partition |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |year=2018 |access-date=16 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061242/https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |url-status=live |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-42561-2 |archive-date=14 April 2023}}
* {{citation |last1=Jayal |first1=Niraja Gopal |title=Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=42 |issue=1 |year=2019 |pages=33–50 |issn=0085-6401 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874|doi-access=free }}
* {{Citation |last=Jayal |first=Niraja Gopal |title=Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=33–50 |year=2019 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874 |doi-access=free}}
* {{cite book |last1 = Abbas |first1 = Hassan |title = Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror |publisher = M.E. Sharpe |year = 2004 |isbn = 978-0-7656-1497-1 |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/pakistansdriftin00hass }}
* {{Cite book |last=Abbas |first=Hassan |url=https://archive.org/details/pakistansdriftin00hass |title=Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7656-1497-1 |url-access=registration}}
* {{cite news |title = Uproar over India mosque report: Inquiry into Babri mosque's demolition in 1992 indicts opposition BJP leaders |url = http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |access-date = 8 July 2014 |work = Al Jazeera |date = 24 November 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Al Jazeera |2009}} |archive-date = 31 January 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100131082341/http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |title = Uproar over India mosque report: Inquiry into Babri mosque's demolition in 1992 indicts opposition BJP leaders |url = http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |access-date = 8 July 2014 |work = Al Jazeera |date = 24 November 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Al Jazeera |2009}} |archive-date = 31 January 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100131082341/http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Banerjee |first1 = Sumanta |title = Civilising the BJP |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 22 July 2005 |volume = 40 |issue = 29 |pages = 3116–3119 |jstor = 4416896 }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Banerjee |first1 = Sumanta |title = Civilising the BJP |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 22 July 2005 |volume = 40 |issue = 29 |pages = 3116–3119 |jstor = 4416896 }}
* {{cite news |url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |title = Narendra Modi sworn in as Indian prime minister |date = 26 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |work = BBC News |ref = {{harvid |BBC |May |2014}} |archive-date = 2 July 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180702163012/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |title = Narendra Modi sworn in as Indian prime minister |date = 26 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |work = BBC News |ref = {{harvid |BBC |May |2014}} |archive-date = 2 July 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180702163012/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |url-status = live }}
* {{cite web |title = Indian Astrology vs Indian Science |url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |publisher = BBC World Service |access-date = 17 January 2014 |ref = {{harvid |BBC |January |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223838/http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=Indian Astrology vs Indian Science |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223838/http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |archive-date=20 October 2014 |access-date=17 January 2014 |publisher=BBC World Service |ref={{harvid|BBC|January|2014}}}}
* {{cite news |last1 = Bhatt |first1 = Sheela |title = What Anandiben Patel is really like |url = http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Rediff |ref = {{harvid |Sheela Bhatt |2014}} |archive-date = 23 June 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140623212643/http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |last1 = Bhatt |first1 = Sheela |title = What Anandiben Patel is really like |url = http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Rediff |ref = {{harvid |Sheela Bhatt |2014}} |archive-date = 23 June 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140623212643/http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last = Bobbio |first = Tommaso |title = Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India |journal = Third World Quarterly |year = 2012 |volume = 33 |issue = 4 |pages = 653–668 |doi = 10.1080/01436597.2012.657423 |s2cid = 154422056 |url = https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |access-date = 29 June 2019 |archive-date = 1 March 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200301151004/https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last = Bobbio |first = Tommaso |title = Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India |journal = Third World Quarterly |year = 2012 |volume = 33 |issue = 4 |pages = 653–668 |doi = 10.1080/01436597.2012.657423 |s2cid = 154422056 |url = https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |access-date = 29 June 2019 |archive-date = 1 March 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200301151004/https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |url-status = live }}
Line 669: Line 977:
* {{cite news |title = It is the govt.'s responsibility to protect LGBT rights, says Harsh Vardhan |url = http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |access-date = 19 July 2014 |work = Business Standard |date = 17 July 2014 |location = Mumbai, India |ref = {{harvid |Business Standard |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223853/http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |title = It is the govt.'s responsibility to protect LGBT rights, says Harsh Vardhan |url = http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |access-date = 19 July 2014 |work = Business Standard |date = 17 July 2014 |location = Mumbai, India |ref = {{harvid |Business Standard |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223853/http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last = Chaulia |first = Sreeram |s2cid = 144714683 |title = BJP, India's Foreign Policy and the "Realist Alternative" to the Nehruvian Tradition |journal = International Politics |date = June 2002 |volume = 39 |issue = 2 |pages = 215–234 |doi = 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8897388}}
* {{cite journal |last = Chaulia |first = Sreeram |s2cid = 144714683 |title = BJP, India's Foreign Policy and the "Realist Alternative" to the Nehruvian Tradition |journal = International Politics |date = June 2002 |volume = 39 |issue = 2 |pages = 215–234 |doi = 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8897388}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last = Davies |first = Richard |editor-first = Alyssa & Philip |editor-last = Ayres & Oldenburg |encyclopedia = India Briefing; Takeoff at Last? |title = The Cultural Background of Hindutva |year = 2005 |publisher = Asia Society }}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |year=2005 |title=The Cultural Background of Hindutva |encyclopedia=India Briefing; Takeoff at Last? |publisher=Asia Society |last=Davies |first=Richard |editor-last=Ayres & Oldenburg |editor-first=Alyssa & Philip}}
* {{cite web | url = http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today | title = Narendra Modi to be sworn in as 15th Prime Minister of India on May 26 | work = [[Deccan Chronicle]] | date = 20 May 2014 | access-date = 26 May 2014 | ref = {{harvid |Deccan Chronicle |2014}} | archive-date = 27 May 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140527225918/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today | url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |date=20 May 2014 |title=Narendra Modi to be sworn in as 15th Prime Minister of India on May 26 |url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140527225918/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today |archive-date=27 May 2014 |access-date=26 May 2014 |website=[[Deccan Chronicle]] |ref={{harvid|Deccan Chronicle|2014}}}}
* {{cite journal |last = Diwakar |first = Rekha |title = The 16th general election in India, April–May 2014 |journal = Electoral Studies |volume = 37 |year = 2014 |pages = 1–6 |doi = 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.005}}
* {{cite journal |last = Diwakar |first = Rekha |title = The 16th general election in India, April–May 2014 |journal = Electoral Studies |volume = 37 |year = 2014 |pages = 1–6 |doi = 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.005}}
* {{cite web |title = General Election to Lok Sabha Trends and Results |url = http://eciresults.nic.in/ |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 June 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2014}} |archive-date = 18 December 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141218160549/http://eciresults.nic.in/ |url-status = dead }}
* {{Cite web |title=General Election to Lok Sabha Trends and Results |url=http://eciresults.nic.in/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141218160549/http://eciresults.nic.in/ |archive-date=18 December 2014 |access-date=18 June 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2014}}}}
* {{cite web |title = List of Political Parties and Election Symbols main Notification Dated 18 January 2013 |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 9 May 2013 |location = India |year = 2013 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2013}} |archive-date = 24 October 2013 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131024171915/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |year=2013 |title=List of Political Parties and Election Symbols main Notification Dated 18 January 2013 |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024171915/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2013 |access-date=9 May 2013 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2013}} |location=India}}
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1984 to the Eighth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1984}} |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718184911/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |archive-date = 18 July 2014 }}
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1984 to the Eighth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718184911/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=18 July 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1984}}}}
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1989 to the Ninth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1989}} |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183934/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |archive-date = 18 July 2014 }}
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1989 to the Ninth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183934/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=18 July 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1989}}}}
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1991}} |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183558/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |archive-date = 18 July 2014 }}
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183558/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=18 July 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1991}}}}
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 30 May 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1996}} |archive-date = 18 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183504/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183504/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1996}}}}
* {{cite web |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha |publisher=Election Commission of India |access-date=30 May 2014 |ref={{harvid |Election Commission |1998}} |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718181833/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 }}
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718181833/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1998}}}}
* {{cite web |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha |publisher=Election Commission of India |access-date=30 May 2014 |ref={{harvid |Election Commission |1999}} |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183222/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 }}
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183222/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|1999}}}}
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 2004 to the Fourteenth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 30 May 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2004}} |archive-date = 18 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718190634/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=Statistical report on general elections, 2004 to the Fourteenth Lok Sabha |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718190634/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2004}}}}
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |title = Performance of National Parties |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 30 May 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2009}} |archive-date = 9 December 2017 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171209173959/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=Performance of National Parties |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171209173959/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |archive-date=9 December 2017 |access-date=30 May 2014 |publisher=Election Commission of India |ref={{harvid|Election Commission|2009}}}}
* {{cite book |last = Fitzgerald |first = Timothy |title = Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth |date = 2011 |publisher = A&C Black |isbn = 978-1-4411-4290-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061250/https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |url-status = live }}
* {{cite book |last = Fitzgerald |first = Timothy |title = Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth |date = 2011 |publisher = A&C Black |isbn = 978-1-4411-4290-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061250/https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |url-status = live }}
* {{cite book |last = Flint |first = Colin |title = The geography of war and peace |publisher = Oxford University Press |year = 2005 |isbn = 978-0-19-516208-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061243/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |url-status = live }}
* {{cite book |last = Flint |first = Colin |title = The geography of war and peace |publisher = Oxford University Press |year = 2005 |isbn = 978-0-19-516208-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061243/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |url-status = live }}
Line 697: Line 1,005:
* {{cite news |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131230070038/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 30 December 2013 |title = Modi did not incite riots: SIT |work = Hindustan Times |access-date = 22 January 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2014}} }}
* {{cite news |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131230070038/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 30 December 2013 |title = Modi did not incite riots: SIT |work = Hindustan Times |access-date = 22 January 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2014}} }}
* {{cite news |title = 2009 Lok Sabha election: Final results tally |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/2009-lok-sabha-election-final-results-tally/article1-411793.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130611071616/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/2009-Lok-Sabha-election-Final-results-tally/Article1-411793.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 11 June 2013 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Hindustan Times |date = 17 May 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2009}} }}
* {{cite news |title = 2009 Lok Sabha election: Final results tally |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/2009-lok-sabha-election-final-results-tally/article1-411793.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130611071616/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/2009-Lok-Sabha-election-Final-results-tally/Article1-411793.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 11 June 2013 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Hindustan Times |date = 17 May 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2009}} }}
* {{cite web |title = Tehelka sting: How Bangaru Laxman fell for the trap |url = http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html |work = [[India Today]] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |ref = {{harvid |India Today |2001}} |archive-date = 14 May 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120514204516/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=Tehelka sting: How Bangaru Laxman fell for the trap |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap-100447-2012-04-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120514204516/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html |archive-date=14 May 2012 |access-date=9 May 2012 |website=[[India Today]] |date=27 April 2012 |ref={{harvid|India Today|2001}}}}
* {{cite book |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher = C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year = 1996 |isbn = 978-1-85065-301-1 }}
* {{cite book |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher = C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year = 1996 |isbn = 978-1-85065-301-1 }}
* {{cite journal |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class |journal = Studies in Indian Politics |date = June 2013 |volume = 1 |pages = 2–27 |doi = 10.1177/2321023013482789|s2cid = 154404089 }}
* {{cite journal |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class |journal = Studies in Indian Politics |date = June 2013 |volume = 1 |pages = 2–27 |doi = 10.1177/2321023013482789|s2cid = 154404089 }}
Line 703: Line 1,011:
* {{cite news |title = Bangaru Laxman convicted of taking bribe |url = http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |work = [[The Hindu]] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |first = Jiby |last = Kattakayam |date = 27 April 2012 |location = Chennai, India |archive-date = 1 May 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120501113222/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |title = Bangaru Laxman convicted of taking bribe |url = http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |work = [[The Hindu]] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |first = Jiby |last = Kattakayam |date = 27 April 2012 |location = Chennai, India |archive-date = 1 May 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120501113222/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Krishnan |first1 = Jayanth |title = India's "Patriot Act": POTA and the Impact on Civil Liberties in the World's Largest Democracy |journal = Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice |date = 2004 |volume = 22 |issue = 2 |pages = 265–300 |url = http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379 |issn = 2767-1992 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |archive-date = 28 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140728192217/http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379/ |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Krishnan |first1 = Jayanth |title = India's "Patriot Act": POTA and the Impact on Civil Liberties in the World's Largest Democracy |journal = Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice |date = 2004 |volume = 22 |issue = 2 |pages = 265–300 |url = http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379 |issn = 2767-1992 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |archive-date = 28 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140728192217/http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379/ |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |last = Krishnan |first = Murali |title = Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims |url = http://www.dw.de/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |publisher = Deutsche Welle |date = 11 March 2012 |author2 = Shamil Shams |ref = {{harvid |Krishnan |2012}} |access-date = 20 December 2013 |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223515/http://www.dw.de/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Kux |first1 = Dennis |title = India's Fine Balance |journal = Foreign Affairs |date = May–June 2002 |volume = 81 |issue = 3 |pages = 93–106 |jstor = 20033165 |doi = 10.2307/20033165}}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Kux |first1 = Dennis |title = India's Fine Balance |journal = Foreign Affairs |date = May–June 2002 |volume = 81 |issue = 3 |pages = 93–106 |jstor = 20033165 |doi = 10.2307/20033165}}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Lall |first1 = Marie |title = Indo-Myanmar Relations in the Era of Pipeline Diplomacy |journal = Contemporary Southeast Asia |date = December 2006 |volume = 28 |issue = 3|doi = 10.1355/CS28-3D |s2cid = 154093220 }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Lall |first1 = Marie |title = Indo-Myanmar Relations in the Era of Pipeline Diplomacy |journal = Contemporary Southeast Asia |date = December 2006 |volume = 28 |issue = 3|pages = 424–446 |s2cid = 154093220 |jstor=25798799}}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Malik |first1 = Yogendra K. |last2 = Singh |first2 = V.B. |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: An Alternative to the Congress (I)? |journal = Asian Survey |date = April 1992 |volume = 32 |issue = 4 |pages = 318–336 |jstor = 2645149 |doi = 10.2307/2645149}}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Malik |first1 = Yogendra K. |last2 = Singh |first2 = V.B. |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: An Alternative to the Congress (I)? |journal = Asian Survey |date = April 1992 |volume = 32 |issue = 4 |pages = 318–336 |jstor = 2645149 |doi = 10.2307/2645149}}
* {{cite news |last = Mathew |first = Liz |url = http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |title = Narendra Modi makes election history as BJP gets majority on its own |work = [[Live Mint]] |date = 16 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |archive-date = 27 May 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140527035606/http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |last = Mathew |first = Liz |url = http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |title = Narendra Modi makes election history as BJP gets majority on its own |work = [[Live Mint]] |date = 16 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |archive-date = 27 May 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140527035606/http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Naqvi |first1 = Saba |last2 = Raman |first2 = Anuradha |journal = Outlook |title = Their Dark Glasses |date = 1 April 2013 |url = http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |ref = {{harvid |Outlook |2013}} |access-date = 23 May 2015 |archive-date = 21 December 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151221141359/http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Naqvi |first1 = Saba |last2 = Raman |first2 = Anuradha |journal = Outlook |title = Their Dark Glasses |date = 1 April 2013 |url = http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |ref = {{harvid |Outlook |2013}} |access-date = 23 May 2015 |archive-date = 21 December 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151221141359/http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |url-status = live }}
* {{cite web |url = http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |title = Lok Sabha at a glance |publisher = National Informatics Centre |access-date = 17 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |National Informatics Centre |2014}} |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140521205101/http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |archive-date = 21 May 2014 |url-status = dead }}
* {{Cite web |title=Lok Sabha at a glance |url=http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140521205101/http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |archive-date=21 May 2014 |access-date=17 July 2014 |publisher=National Informatics Centre |ref={{harvid|National Informatics Centre|2014}}}}
* {{cite web |title = Report: Sequence of events on December 6 |url = http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |publisher = NDTV |access-date = 20 June 2012 |ref = {{harvid |NDTV |2012}} |archive-date = 26 September 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100926132622/http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=Report: Sequence of events on December 6 |url=http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100926132622/http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |archive-date=26 September 2010 |access-date=20 June 2012 |publisher=NDTV |ref={{harvid|NDTV|2012}}}}
* {{cite web |url = http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-18-years-in-jail-261251 |title = Naroda Patiya riots: Former minister Maya Kodnani gets 28 years in jail |publisher = NDTV.com |access-date = 17 November 2012 |ref = {{harvid |NDTV.com |2012}} |archive-date = 26 December 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181226045146/https://www.ndtv.com/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-28-years-in-jail-498222 |url-status = dead }}
* {{Cite web |title=Naroda Patiya riots: Former minister Maya Kodnani gets 28 years in jail |url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-18-years-in-jail-261251 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226045146/https://www.ndtv.com/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-28-years-in-jail-498222 |archive-date=26 December 2018 |access-date=17 November 2012 |publisher=NDTV.com |ref={{harvid|NDTV.com|2012}}}}
* {{cite journal |first = A. G. |last = Noorani |title = Foreign Policy of the Janata Party Government |journal = Asian Affairs |volume = 5 |date = March–April 1978 |pages = 216–228 |jstor = 30171643 |issue = 4 |doi = 10.1080/00927678.1978.10554044}}
* {{cite journal |first = A. G. |last = Noorani |title = Foreign Policy of the Janata Party Government |journal = Asian Affairs |volume = 5 |date = March–April 1978 |pages = 216–228 |jstor = 30171643 |issue = 4 |doi = 10.1080/00927678.1978.10554044}}
* {{cite book |last = Nussbaum |first = Martha Craven |title = The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future |year = 2008 |publisher = Harvard University Press |isbn = 978-0-674-03059-6 |page = 2}}
* {{cite book |last = Nussbaum |first = Martha Craven |title = The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future |year = 2008 |publisher = Harvard University Press |isbn = 978-0-674-03059-6 |page = 2}}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Pai |first1 = Sudha |title = Transformation of the Indian Party System: The 1996 Lok Sabha Elections |journal = Asian Survey |date = December 1996 |volume = 36 |issue = 12 |pages = 1170–1183 |jstor = 2645573 |doi = 10.2307/2645573}}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Pai |first1 = Sudha |title = Transformation of the Indian Party System: The 1996 Lok Sabha Elections |journal = Asian Survey |date = December 1996 |volume = 36 |issue = 12 |pages = 1170–1183 |jstor = 2645573 |doi = 10.2307/2645573}}
* {{cite web |url = http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |title = An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999 |date = April 2002 |last = Qadir |first = Shaukat |work = RUSI Journal |access-date = 20 May 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120655/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |archive-date = 27 March 2009 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Qadir |first=Shaukat |date=April 2002 |title=An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999 |url=http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120655/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |archive-date=27 March 2009 |access-date=20 May 2009 |website=RUSI Journal}}
* {{cite journal |last = Ramachandran |first = Sujata |title = 'Operation Pushback' Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 15 February 2003 |volume = 38 |issue = 7 |pages = 637–647 |jstor = 4413218 }}
* {{cite journal |last = Ramachandran |first = Sujata |title = 'Operation Pushback' Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 15 February 2003 |volume = 38 |issue = 7 |pages = 637–647 |jstor = 4413218 }}
* {{cite news |last = Ramaseshan |first = Radhika |title = BJP comes out, vows to oppose homosexuality |url = http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131216103934/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 December 2013 |access-date = 16 December 2013 |work = The Telegraph |date = 14 December 2013 |location = Calcutta, India }}
* {{cite news |last = Ramaseshan |first = Radhika |title = BJP comes out, vows to oppose homosexuality |url = http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131216103934/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 December 2013 |access-date = 16 December 2013 |work = The Telegraph |date = 14 December 2013 |location = Calcutta, India }}
* {{cite news |last = Ramesh |first = Randeep |title = News World news Shock defeat for India's Hindu nationalists |url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |access-date = 10 December 2013 |work = The Guardian |date = 14 May 2004 |archive-date = 12 June 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180612144006/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |last = Ramesh |first = Randeep |title = News World news Shock defeat for India's Hindu nationalists |url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |access-date = 10 December 2013 |work = The Guardian |date = 14 May 2004 |archive-date = 12 June 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180612144006/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |url-status = live }}
* {{cite web |url = http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |title = TDP helps Vajpayee wins confidence vote |work = Rediff.com |access-date = 4 January 2011 |ref = {{harvid |rediff.com |1998}} |archive-date = 2 May 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100502104757/http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=TDP helps Vajpayee wins confidence vote |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100502104757/http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |archive-date=2 May 2010 |access-date=4 January 2011 |website=Rediff.com |ref={{harvid|rediff.com|1998}}}}
* {{cite book |last1 = Sen |first1 = Amartya |title = India and the world. |date = 2005 |publisher = 2005. |location = Allen Lane |isbn = 978-0-7139-9687-6 |edition = 1. publ.}}
* {{cite book |last1 = Sen |first1 = Amartya |title = India and the world. |date = 2005 |publisher = 2005. |location = Allen Lane |isbn = 978-0-7139-9687-6 |edition = 1. publ.}}
* {{cite journal |last = Seshia |first = Shaila |title = Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |journal = Asian Survey |date = November 1998 |volume = 38 |issue = 11 |pages = 1036–1050 |doi = 10.2307/2645684|jstor = 2645684 }}
* {{cite journal |last = Seshia |first = Shaila |title = Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |journal = Asian Survey |date = November 1998 |volume = 38 |issue = 11 |pages = 1036–1050 |doi = 10.2307/2645684|jstor = 2645684 }}
* {{cite journal |last = Shulman |first = Stephen |title = Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration |journal = International Studies Quarterly |date = September 2000 |volume = 44 |issue = 3 |pages = 365–390 |doi = 10.1111/0020-8833.00164}}
* {{cite journal |last = Shulman |first = Stephen |title = Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration |journal = International Studies Quarterly |date = September 2000 |volume = 44 |issue = 3 |pages = 365–390 |doi = 10.1111/0020-8833.00164}}
* {{cite journal |last = Sridharan |first = Eswaran |title = India's Watershed Vote |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014 |url = https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |access-date = 23 April 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150112142754/https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |archive-date = 12 January 2015 |url-status = dead }}
* {{cite journal |last = Sridharan |first = Eswaran |title = India's Watershed Vote |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014 |doi = 10.1353/jod.2014.0068 |s2cid = 154669666 |url = https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |access-date = 23 April 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150112142754/https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |archive-date = 12 January 2015 |url-status = dead }}
* {{cite book |last1 = Swain |first1 = Pratap Chandra |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: Profile and Performance |date = 2001 |publisher = APH publishing |location = India |isbn = 978-81-7648-257-8 |pages = 71–104 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |access-date = 5 July 2014 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061228/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |url-status = live }}
* {{cite book |last1 = Swain |first1 = Pratap Chandra |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: Profile and Performance |date = 2001 |publisher = APH publishing |location = India |isbn = 978-81-7648-257-8 |pages = 71–104 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |access-date = 5 July 2014 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061228/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |url-status = live }}
* {{cite web |title = Bangaru Laxman convicted for taking bribe |url = http://www.tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |work = [[Tehelka]] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |ref = {{harvid |Tehelka |2001}} |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120511094603/http://tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |archive-date = 11 May 2012 |url-status = dead }}
* {{Cite web |title=Bangaru Laxman convicted for taking bribe |url=http://www.tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120511094603/http://tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |archive-date=11 May 2012 |access-date=9 May 2012 |website=[[Tehelka]] |ref={{harvid|Tehelka|2001}}}}
* {{cite web |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |title = Election results 2014: India places its faith in Moditva |publisher = Timesofindia.indiatimes.com |date = 17 May 2014 |access-date = 11 August 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223225/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |date=17 May 2014 |title=Election results 2014: India places its faith in Moditva |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223225/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |archive-date=20 October 2014 |access-date=11 August 2014 |publisher=Timesofindia.indiatimes.com |ref={{harvid|Times of India|2014}}}}
* {{cite news |url = http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-07-13/mumbai/27289812_1_vaiko-pota-prevention-of-terrorism-act |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120916205038/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-07-13/mumbai/27289812_1_vaiko-pota-prevention-of-terrorism-act |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 September 2012 |title = SP condemns Vaiko's arrest under Pota |date = 13 July 2002 |work = [[The Times of India]] |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2002}} }}
* {{cite news |url = https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/SP-condemns-Vaikos-arrest-under-Pota/articleshow/15884672.cms |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120916205038/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-07-13/mumbai/27289812_1_vaiko-pota-prevention-of-terrorism-act |url-status = live |archive-date = 16 September 2012 |title = SP condemns Vaiko's arrest under Pota |date = 13 July 2002 |work = [[The Times of India]] |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2002}} }}
* {{cite news |title = BJP amends constitution allowing Gadkari to get a second term |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |access-date = 4 April 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 28 September 2012 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2012}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223443/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |title = BJP amends constitution allowing Gadkari to get a second term |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |access-date = 4 April 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 28 September 2012 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2012}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223443/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |title = Stand with RSS, BJP |url = http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |access-date = 13 March 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 20 December 2013 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2013}} |archive-date = 13 March 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140313193845/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |title = Stand with RSS, BJP |url = http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |access-date = 13 March 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 20 December 2013 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2013}} |archive-date = 13 March 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140313193845/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |url-status = dead }}
* {{cite news |last = Chatterjee |first = Mohua |url = http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |title = BJP enrolls 11 crore members, launches 'Mahasampark Abhiyan' |work = First Post |date = 13 July 2015 |ref = {{harvid |First Post |2015}} |access-date = 14 July 2015 |archive-date = 24 September 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150924144320/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite news |last = Chatterjee |first = Mohua |url = http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |title = BJP enrolls 11 crore members, launches 'Mahasampark Abhiyan' |work = First Post |date = 13 July 2015 |ref = {{harvid |First Post |2015}} |access-date = 14 July 2015 |archive-date = 24 September 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150924144320/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |url-status = live }}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Tiwari |first1 = Aviral Kumar |title = An Error-Correction Analysis of India-Us Trade Flows |journal = Journal of Economic Development |date = March 2012 |volume = 37 |issue = 1}}
* {{cite journal |last1 = Tiwari |first1 = Aviral Kumar |title = An Error-Correction Analysis of India-Us Trade Flows |journal = Journal of Economic Development |date = March 2012 |volume = 37 |issue = 1}}
* {{cite web |title = India: International Religious Freedom Report |url = https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |publisher = US Department of state |access-date = 11 August 2014 |ref = {{harvid |International Religious Freedom Report |2005}} |archive-date = 3 July 2017 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170703181658/https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |url-status = live }}
* {{Cite web |title=India: International Religious Freedom Report |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703181658/https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |archive-date=3 July 2017 |access-date=11 August 2014 |publisher=US Department of state |ref={{harvid|International Religious Freedom Report|2005}}}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last = Vajpayee |first = Atal Bihari |editor-first = Christophe |editor-last = Jaffrelot |editor-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = Hindu Nationalism: A Reader |year = 2007 |publisher = [[Permanent Black]] |location = Delhi |isbn = 978-0-691-13098-9 }}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |year=2007 |title=Hindu Nationalism: A Reader |publisher=[[Permanent Black]] |location=Delhi |last=Vajpayee |first=Atal Bihari |editor-last=Jaffrelot |editor-first=Christophe |editor-link=Christophe Jaffrelot |isbn=978-0-691-13098-9}}
* {{cite journal |last = Varshney |first = Ashutosh |s2cid = 144608424 |title = Hindu Nationalism in Power? |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014|pages = 34–45 |doi = 10.1353/jod.2014.0071 }}
* {{cite journal |last = Varshney |first = Ashutosh |s2cid = 144608424 |title = Hindu Nationalism in Power? |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014|pages = 34–45 |doi = 10.1353/jod.2014.0071 }}
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}
Line 740: Line 1,047:
{{Refbegin|30em}}
{{Refbegin|30em}}
{{Main|Bibliography of the Sangh Parivar}}
{{Main|Bibliography of the Sangh Parivar}}
* {{cite book|first=Gurdas M.|last=Ahuja|title=Bharatiya Janata Party and Resurgent India|publisher=Ram Company|year=2004 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |first=Gurdas M. |last=Ahuja |title=Bharatiya Janata Party and Resurgent India |publisher=Ram Company |year=2004 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |first1=Walter K. |last1=Andersen |author-link=Walter K. Andersen |first2=Shridhar D. |last2=Damle |title=The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism |url=https://archive.org/details/brotherhoodinsaf0000ande |url-access=registration |orig-year=Originally published by Westview Press |publisher=Vistaar Publications |location=Delhi |year=1987 |ref=none }}
* {{cite book |first1=Walter K. |last1=Andersen |author-link=Walter K. Andersen |first2=Shridhar D. |last2=Damle |title=The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism |url=https://archive.org/details/brotherhoodinsaf0000ande |url-access=registration |orig-date=Originally published by Westview Press |publisher=Vistaar Publications |location=Delhi |year=1987 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last1=Bhambhri |first1=C.P. |title=Bharatiya Janata Party : Periphery to Centre |date=2001 |publisher=Shipra |location=Delhi |isbn=978-81-7541-078-7 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last1=Bhambhri |first1=C.P. |title=Bharatiya Janata Party : Periphery to Centre |date=2001 |publisher=Shipra |location=Delhi |isbn=978-81-7541-078-7 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |first=Craig |last=Baxter |author-link=Craig Baxter |title=The Jana Sangh&nbsp;— A Biography of an Indian Political Party |publisher=Oxford University Press, Bombay |year=1971 |orig-year=first published by [[University of Pennsylvania Press]] 1969 |isbn=978-0-8122-7583-4 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/janasanghbiograp0000baxt |ref=none }}
* {{cite book |first=Craig |last=Baxter |author-link=Craig Baxter |title=The Jana Sangh&nbsp;— A Biography of an Indian Political Party |publisher=Oxford University Press, Bombay |year=1971 |orig-date=first published by [[University of Pennsylvania Press]] 1969 |isbn=978-0-8122-7583-4 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/janasanghbiograp0000baxt |ref=none}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Chadha|first1=Kalyani|first2=Pallavi|last2=Guha|title=The Bharatiya Janata Party's online campaign and citizen involvement in India's 2014 election|url=https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947|journal=[[International Journal of Communication]]|volume=10|date=2016|access-date=16 May 2021|archive-date=16 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516184915/https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947|url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Chadha |first1=Kalyani |first2=Pallavi |last2=Guha |title=The Bharatiya Janata Party's online campaign and citizen involvement in India's 2014 election |url=https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947 |journal=[[International Journal of Communication]] |volume=10 |date=2016 |access-date=16 May 2021 |archive-date=16 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516184915/https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal|last=Ganguly|first=Sumit|title=Hindu nationalism and the foreign policy of India's Bharatiya Janata Party|journal=Transatlantic Academy Paper Series|volume=2|date=2015|pages=1–15|url=https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf|isbn=978-1-5292-0460-5|access-date=11 January 2021|archive-date=4 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304071320/https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf|url-status=dead}}
* {{cite journal |last=Ganguly |first=Sumit |title=Hindu nationalism and the foreign policy of India's Bharatiya Janata Party |journal=Transatlantic Academy Paper Series |volume=2 |date=2015 |pages=1–15 |url=https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf |isbn=978-1-5292-0460-5 |access-date=11 January 2021 |archive-date=4 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304071320/https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf |url-status=dead}}
* {{cite book |last=Graham |first=B. D. |title=Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and Development of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-38348-6 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last=Graham |first=B. D. |title=Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and Development of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-38348-6 |ref=none}}
* {{cite journal|url=[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826 |title=Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics |year=2015 |last1=Harriss |first1=John |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=712–718 |s2cid=147615034 }}
* {{cite journal |doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826 |title=Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics |year=2015 |last1=Harriss |first1=John |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=712–718 |s2cid=147615034 |doi-access=free}}
* {{cite book |last1=Malik |first1=Yogendra K. |last2=Singh |first2=V.B. |title=Hindu Nationalists in India : The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |date=1994 |publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, Colorado |isbn=978-0-8133-8810-6}}
* {{cite book |last1=Malik |first1=Yogendra K. |last2=Singh |first2=V.B. |title=Hindu Nationalists in India : The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |date=1994 |publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, Colorado |isbn=978-0-8133-8810-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Jaffrelot |first=Christophe |author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot|title=The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher=C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year=1996 |isbn=978-1-85065-301-1 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last=Jaffrelot |first=Christophe |author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot |title=The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher=C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year=1996 |isbn=978-1-85065-301-1 |ref=none}}
* {{cite journal|last=Jaffrelot|first=Christophe|author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot|title=Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?|journal=Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics|date=July 2003|page=16|url=http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf|access-date=5 November 2013|ref=none|archive-date=4 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204131058/http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf|url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal |last=Jaffrelot |first=Christophe |author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot |title=Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk? |journal=Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics |date=July 2003 |page=16 |url=http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf |access-date=5 November 2013 |ref=none |archive-date=4 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204131058/http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf |url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Jain|first1=Varsha|first2=Ganesh|last2=B.E.|title=Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders: A Case of India and Narendra Modi.|journal=Journal of Political Marketing|volume=19|issue=1–2|date=2020|pages=15–33|doi=10.1080/15377857.2019.1652222|s2cid=202247610}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Jain |first1=Varsha |first2=Ganesh |last2=B.E. |title=Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders: A Case of India and Narendra Modi. |journal=Journal of Political Marketing |volume=19 |issue=1–2 |date=2020 |pages=15–33 |doi=10.1080/15377857.2019.1652222 |s2cid=202247610}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mishra |first1=Madhusudan |title=Bharatiya Janata Party and India's Foreign Policy |date=1997 |publisher=Uppal Pub. House |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-85565-79-8 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mishra |first1=Madhusudan |title=Bharatiya Janata Party and India's Foreign Policy |date=1997 |publisher=Uppal Pub. House |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-85565-79-8 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last=Nag |first=Kingshuk |author-link=Kingshuk Nag |title=The Saffron Tide: The Rise of the BJP |publisher=Rupa Publications |year=2014 |isbn=978-8129134295 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last=Nag |first=Kingshuk |author-link=Kingshuk Nag |title=The Saffron Tide: The Rise of the BJP |publisher=Rupa Publications |year=2014 |isbn=978-8129134295 |ref=none}}
Line 757: Line 1,064:
* Palshikar, Suhas, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Lodha, eds. ''Electoral Politics in India: The Resurgence of the Bharatiya Janata Party'' (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
* Palshikar, Suhas, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Lodha, eds. ''Electoral Politics in India: The Resurgence of the Bharatiya Janata Party'' (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
* Raghavan, G.N.S. ''New Era in the Indian Polity, A Study of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the BJP'' (1996).
* Raghavan, G.N.S. ''New Era in the Indian Polity, A Study of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the BJP'' (1996).
* {{cite journal|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856327 |jstor=41856327 |title=Foreign Policy Position of Bharatiya Janata Party Towards Issues of India Pakistan Relations |last1=Sanjeev Kr |first1=H. M. |journal=The Indian Journal of Political Science |year=2007 |volume=68 |issue=2 |pages=275–291 }}
* {{cite journal |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856327 |jstor=41856327 |title=Foreign Policy Position of Bharatiya Janata Party Towards Issues of India Pakistan Relations |last1=Sanjeev Kr |first1=H. M. |journal=The Indian Journal of Political Science |year=2007 |volume=68 |issue=2 |pages=275–291 |access-date=11 January 2021 |archive-date=13 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210113184500/https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856327 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sharma |first1=C.P. Thakur, Devendra P. |title=India under Atal Behari Vajpayee : The BJP Era |date=1999 |publisher=UBS Publishers' Distributors |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-7476-250-4 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |author1=Devendra P. Sharma |author2=C.P. Thakur |title=India under Atal Behari Vajpayee : The BJP Era |date=1999 |publisher=UBS Publishers' Distributors |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-7476-250-4 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last1=Stein|first1=Burton|title=A history of India|year=2010|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|location=Chichester, UK|isbn=978-1-4051-9509-6|edition= edited by David Arnold. 2nd |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last1=Stein |first1=Burton |title=A history of India |year=2010 |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |location=Chichester, UK |isbn=978-1-4051-9509-6 |edition=edited by David Arnold. 2nd |ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last1=Rao|first1=Ramesh|title=Coalition conundrum: the BJP's trials, tribulations, and triumphs|year=2001|publisher=Har Anand|isbn=9788124108093 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rao |first1=Ramesh |title=Coalition conundrum: the BJP's trials, tribulations, and triumphs |year=2001 |publisher=Har Anand |isbn=9788124108093 |ref=none}}
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}


== External links ==
== External links ==
<!-- ATTENTION! Please do not add links without discussion and consensus on the talk page. Undiscussed links will be removed. -->
<!-- ATTENTION! Please do not add links without discussion and consensus on the talk page. Undiscussed links will be removed. -->
 
{{Wikinews category|Bharatiya Janata Party}}{{Commons and category}}
* {{Official website|https://www.bjp.org/}}
* {{GovPubs|bjp%20india|BJP}}
* {{GovPubs|bjp%20india|BJP}} 
* {{Internet Archive author|sname=Bharatiya Janata Party}}
* {{Curlie|Regional/Asia/India/Society_and_Culture/Politics/Parties/Bharatiya_Janata_Party/|BJP}}
* {{Internet Archive author|sname=Bharatiya Janata Party}}  
* {{Britannica|64033}}
* {{Britannica|64033}}


{{Bharatiya Janata Party}}
{{Bharatiya Janata Party}}
{{Navboxes  
{{Navboxes
|title=[[:Category:Bharatiya Janata Party|Related to Bharatiya Janata Party]]  
|title=[[:Category:Bharatiya Janata Party|Related to Bharatiya Janata Party]]
|list1=  
|list1=
{{Sangh Parivar}}
{{Sangh Parivar}}
{{National Democratic Alliance}}  
{{National Democratic Alliance}}
{{Indian political parties}}
{{Indian political parties}}
{{Hindu Nationalism}}
{{Hindu Nationalism}}
}}
}}
 
{{Portal bar|Conservatism|India|Politics}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


Line 788: Line 1,093:
[[Category:Anti-communist parties]]
[[Category:Anti-communist parties]]
[[Category:Anti-communism in India]]
[[Category:Anti-communism in India]]
[[Category:Anti-Islam sentiment in India]]
[[Category:Conservative parties in India]]
[[Category:Conservative parties in India]]
[[Category:Conservative parties in Asia]]
[[Category:Far-right political parties in India]]
[[Category:Hindu political parties]]
[[Category:Hindutva political parties]]
[[Category:Hindu organisations based in India]]
[[Category:Hindu nationalism]]
[[Category:Hindutva]]
[[Category:Identity politics]]
[[Category:Identity politics in India]]
[[Category:Identity politics in India]]
[[Category:Indian Hindu political parties]]
[[Category:Indian nationalist political parties]]
[[Category:Indian nationalist political parties]]
[[Category:International Democrat Union member parties]]
[[Category:International Democracy Union]]
[[Category:National conservative parties]]
[[Category:National conservative parties]]
[[Category:National political parties in India]]
[[Category:National political parties in India]]
Line 805: Line 1,104:
[[Category:Neoliberal parties]]
[[Category:Neoliberal parties]]
[[Category:Political parties established in 1980]]
[[Category:Political parties established in 1980]]
[[Category:Right-wing parties in Asia]]
[[Category:Right-wing parties]]
[[Category:Right-wing populism in India]]
[[Category:Right-wing populism in India]]
[[Category:Right-wing populist parties]]
[[Category:Right-wing populist parties]]
[[Category:Social conservative parties]]
[[Category:Socially conservative parties]]
[[Category:Sangh Parivar]]
[[Category:Sangh Parivar]]

Revision as of 18:55, 29 March 2026


Bharatiya Janata Party
AbbreviationBJP
PresidentNitin Nabin[1]
General SecretaryTemplate:Clist
PresidiumNational Executive[2]
Lok Sabha leaderNarendra Modi (Leader of the House in Lok Sabha)[3]
Rajya Sabha leaderJ. P. Nadda (Leader of the House in Rajya Sabha)[4]
TreasurerRajesh Agarwal[5]
Founder
Founded6 April 1980; 46 years ago (1980-04-06)[13]
Split fromJanata Party[13]
Preceded by
Headquarters6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, New Delhi, Delhi, India[14]
Newspaper
Think tankPublic Policy Research Centre[17][18]
Youth wingBharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha[19]
Women's wingBJP Mahila Morcha[20]
Labour wingBharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (unofficial)[21]
Peasant's wingBJP Kisan Morcha[22]
Ideology
Political positionRight-wing[28] to far-right[29]
International affiliationAsia Pacific Democracy Union (formerly)[30]
Colours  Saffron[31]
ECI StatusNational Party[32]
Alliance
Seats in Lok Sabha
240 / 543
(540 MPs and 3 vacant)[36]
Seats in Rajya Sabha
106 / 245
(243 MPs and 2 vacant)[37][38][39]
Seats in State Legislative Councils
165 / 426
(403 MLCs and 23 vacant; complete list)
Seats in State Legislative Assemblies
1,656 / 4,126
(4118 MLAs and 8 vacant; complete list)
Number of states and union territories in government
21 / 31
(28 States and 3 UTs)[40]
Election symbol
File:Lotos flower symbol.svg
Lotus
Party flag
Website
bjp.org

The Bharatiya Janata Party[lower-alpha 1] (BJP; lit. 'Indian People's Party') is a conservative political party in India and one of the two major Indian political parties alongside the Indian National Congress.[41] BJP emerged from Shyama Prasad Mukherjee's Bharatiya Jana Sangh.[42] Since 2014, it has been the ruling political party in India under the incumbent prime minister Narendra Modi.[43] The BJP is right-wing to far-right on the political spectrum, and it has close ideological and organisational links to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a far-right paramilitary organisation.[44][45] The party's policies adhere to Hindutva, a Hindu nationalist ideology.[46][47] As of January 2024, it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the parliament as well as state legislatures.

The party's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, after he left the Hindu Mahasabha to form a party as the political wing of the RSS.[48][49] After the Emergency of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the Janata Party; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the 1977 general election. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the 1984 general election, it grew in strength on the back of the Ram Rath Yatra in Uttar Pradesh. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee, lasted for only 13 days.[50]

After the 1998 general election, the BJP-led coalition known as the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the 2004 general election, the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the chief minister of Gujarat, led the party to a landslide victory in the 2014 general election. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected with a sole majority in the 2019 general election and with a coalition in the 2024 general election. As of September 2025, the alliance governs 20 Indian states and union territories.

The official ideology of the BJP is integral humanism, first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965. The party advocates social conservatism and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindutva priorities, and focused on a largely neoliberal economic policy that prioritised globalisation and economic growth over social welfare.[51] Since returning to government in 2014, the now-ruling BJP has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of triple talaq, and revoking Article 370 of the Indian constitution (which granted autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir), abrogating its statehood.[52] India has experienced nationwide democratic backsliding under the BJP's rule since 2014.[53][54][55][56]

Name and symbols

The name as well as the symbol of the party were selected by the founders. The name "Bharatiya Janata Party" literally translates to "Indian People's Party". The Symbol of the party is the flower Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera).[57] Lotus has a cultural significance within India as well as Hinduism. The symbol has been regarded as a symbol of peace and prosperity within Hinduism. Likewise, during the independence movement of India, the symbol was used by Indian nationalist as a symbol of revolt against the British Raj.[58] Lotus is also recognised as the national flower of India. Thus, use of the symbol gives the party a nationalist as well as Hindutva appeal.[59] Besides these, the party also heavily uses the Saffron colour in its promotional materials and campaigning. Similar to Lotus, the Saffron colour also has a major significance within Hinduism.[60] The most common flag used by the party is predominantly saffron with a stripe of green in the left. Within the Saffron part of the flag, the lotus symbol is also integrated.[61] This particular colour scheme used in the flag assists the party to project itself as a secular party. Meanwhile, this also helps the party to maintain a religious undertone for its core electorate and Hindutva supporter groups.[61]

Precursors

Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77)

Influential figures
Lal Krishna Advani, the last president of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh

The BJP's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by Shyama Prasad Mukherjee in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant National Congress party. It was founded in collaboration with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a far-right Hindutva paramilitary organisation. The Jana Sangh was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS.[62] The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of Pakistan by the Congress party and then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. The RSS loaned several of its leading pracharaks, or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was Deendayal Upadhyaya, who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three Lok Sabha seats in the first general elections in 1952. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.[63][64]

The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India.[65] Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail.[65] Mauli Chandra Sharma was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of integral humanism, which formed the official doctrine of the party.[66] Younger leaders, such as Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Lal Krishna Advani also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a uniform civil code, banning cow slaughter and abolishing the special status given to Jammu and Kashmir.[67]

After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the Swatantra Party and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the Hindi Belt, including Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.[68]

The electoral history of the BJP and its predecessors in general elections

Janata Party (1977–80)

In 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed a state of emergency. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the Socialist Party, the Congress (O) and the Bharatiya Lok Dal to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi.[64] The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with Morarji Desai as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. Vajpayee, previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the Minister of External Affairs.[69]

The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation.[70] The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party.[71] Violence between Hindus and Muslims increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in Aligarh and Jamshedpur in 1978–79.[citation needed] The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the former Jana Sangh members should dissociate themselves from the RSS, which they refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the Janata Party (Secular). The Morarji Desai government was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing Desai's resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, which is now known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.[72][69]

History

Formation and early days

Influential figures
Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the founder-president of the Bharatiya Janata Party
Lal Krishna Advani has been the national president of the party in three separate occasions

Although the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president.[73] Historian Ramachandra Guha writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the Hindutva stance of its predecessor Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of Gandhian socialism.[74] This was unsuccessful, as it won only two Lok Sabha seats in the elections of 1984.[74] The only two candidates of the party who won were A. K. Patel from Mehsana Lok Sabha constituency in Gujarat and C. Janga Reddy from Hanamkonda Lok Sabha constituency in Andhra Pradesh.[59] The assassination of Indira Gandhi a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the Congress which won a record tally of 414 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.[75]

Ram Janmabhoomi movement

Ram Rath Yatra

The failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindutva.[74][76] In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. In the early 1980s, the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a temple dedicated to the Hindu deity Rama at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor Babur in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there.[77] The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque.[78] The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 Lok Sabha seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the National Front government of V. P. Singh.[79]

In September 1990, Advani began a Rath Yatra (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the yatra was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim".[80] Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then Bihar chief minister Lalu Prasad Yadav. A large number of kar sevaks (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several kar sevaks. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh.[81] The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the Uttar Pradesh assembly.[82]

On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque.[82] The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the demolition of the mosque.[82] Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people.[82] The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition.[83][84] Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act.[82] In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament.[50] Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.[50]

A 2009 report, authored by Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP.[84] Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and Murli Manohar Joshi. The report also criticised Kalyan Singh, Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition.[84] He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition.[84] In 2020, the Supreme Court of India acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.[85]

Following the 2019 Supreme Court verdict, the Government of India announced a trust to construct the Mandir. On 22 January 2024, the Ram Mandir was officially opened.[60] Prime Minister Narendra Modi led its consecration, claiming it to be the start of a new era.[60] The temple is expected to be fully completed by September 2025.[86]

Vajpayee and Advani era (1980–2014)

A coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the Samata Party, the Shiromani Akali Dal, the Shiv Sena in addition to the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the Biju Janata Dal. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; Amartya Sen, for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping.[87] The NDA had a majority with outside support from the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister.[88] However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, J. Jayalalithaa, withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.[89]

On 13 October 1999, without the AIADMK, the NDA won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest-ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister[lower-alpha 2] and Home Affairs Minister. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror and neo-liberal economic policies.[51] In 2001, Bangaru Laxman, then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in a sting operation.[90][91] He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.[92]

2002 Gujarat violence

On 27 February 2002, a train carrying Hindu pilgrims was burned outside the town of Godhra, killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of Gujarat that lasted several weeks.[93] The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced.[94] Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread.[94][95] The then-Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties.[96] In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT, causing widespread anger and disbelief among the country's Muslim communities.[97] BJP MLA Maya Kodnani, who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment;[98][99] she was later acquitted by the Gujarat High Court.[100] Scholars such as Paul Brass, Martha Nussbaum and Dipankar Gupta have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.[101][102][103]

Vajpayee called for early elections in 2004, six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "India Shining", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country.[104] However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the Lok Sabha, compared to the 222 seats of the Congress and its allies. Manmohan Singh succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the United Progressive Alliance. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.[104][105]

In May 2008, the BJP won the state elections in Karnataka. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any South Indian state. In the 2009 general elections, its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. The election campaign would be the final for Advani as leader. The party would be led by Arun Jaitley in the Rajya Sabha and Sushma Swaraj in the Lok Sabha for the following 5 years. It lost the Karnataka assembly election in 2013.[106]

Modi era (2014–present)

Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India since 2014
Amit Shah was the national president of the party during 2014–2019

In the 2014 Indian general election, the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha.[107] Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th prime minister of India on 26 May 2014.[108][109] The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won.[110] This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament[111] and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its strength. Support was concentrated in the Hindi-speaking belt in north-central India.[110] The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.[110]

Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term.[112] The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and Dalit people, as well as among other Backward classes.[113][110] Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP.[113][110] The BJP was also very successful at mobilising its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.[110]

After winning the election, the organisation of the BJP became more centralised with Modi at the helm.[114] People loyal to Modi were rewarded leadership positions across various states within India.[115] Amit Shah, a close confidant of Modi, was appointed as the president of the BJP in 2014.[116] Contextually, many veteran leaders of the party like L. K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, and Jaswant Singh amongst others were allegedly sidelined.[117]

In 2016, the BJP joined the International Democracy Union, a group of various centre-right and right-wing political parties across the globe.[118] However, as of 2024, the party is no longer a member, the secretary general of the IDU, Tina Mercep, stated that they would welcome full membership of the BJP in their global network. However, the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha remains as a member of the youth wing of the IDU.[119][120]

During Modi's first term as prime minister, the BJP expanded its presence in several states where it had previously been a minor player, and it regained power in other states where it had been in opposition for a considerable period. Assam, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, and Jammu and Kashmir saw an increase in the BJP's influence, and the party entered government in several of these states.[121]

In 2019, the BJP won the general election with an increased majority. Soon after returning to power, on 5 August 2019, the Modi administration revoked the special status, or limited autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state. This state consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of a dispute among India, Pakistan, and China since 1947.[122][123]

Later in 2019, the Modi administration introduced the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, which was passed by the Parliament of India on 11 December 2019. It amended the Citizenship Act, 1955 by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian religion, who had fled persecution from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan before December 2014.[124][125] Muslims from those countries were not given such eligibility.[126] The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law.[126][lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 4][lower-alpha 5] A report by the V-Dem Institute described India as experiencing democratic backsliding due to the Modi era.[53][54] Various other studies and media sources also cite India experiencing democratic backsliding.[56][127][128][55][129] This is considered the most notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian Emergency years of 1975–77.[130][131]

Ideology and political positions

Template:Conservatism in India The party, throughout its history, has widely been described as a right-wing,[28][132][133][134] but has recently increasingly been described as far-right.[29][135][136][137]

Social policies and Hindutva

The official philosophy of the BJP is "Integral humanism", a philosophy first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage."[138][139] It is committed to Hindutva, an ideology articulated by Indian independence activist Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over westernisation, thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion.[74] Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a Hindu nationalist party in a general sense.[82][74][140][141] The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.[82][51]

The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the Ram Mandir temple at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque.[140] This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections.[140] However, the demolition of the mosque during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda.[140] The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools.[142] Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "saffronise" Indian history.[142][143][144][145] The NDA government introduced Hindu astrology as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.[146]

Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions.[147] In 2014, Yellapragada Sudershan Rao, who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR).[148] Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.[148][149][150] Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars Nandini Sundar and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions.[52] The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasising the role of Jawaharlal Nehru, and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.[52][151]

The BJP supports a uniform civil code, which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority.[74][140] The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted,[152][153][154] the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its accession to the Indian Union.[74] It simultaneously abrogated Jammu and Kashmir statehood, dividing it into two separate union territories, those being Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.[52]

The BJP opposes illegal immigration into India from Bangladesh.[141] The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy, and stability of the country.[141] Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants.[141] Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful.[141][155] The party later formed the government in Assam.[156] The Modi administration passed a citizenship law in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who are Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians.[124][125] The law does not grant such eligibility to Muslims.[157][158][126] This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law: it attracted global criticism, and sparked widespread protests that were halted by the COVID-19 pandemic.[52][126][lower-alpha 6] Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the 2020 Delhi riots, caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.[159][160] Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.[161][162][163]

In 2013, the Supreme Court of India reinstated the controversial Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics largely stated that they supported the verdict.[164][165] BJP president Rajnath Singh said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural,[166] though the party softened the public stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections.[167] The Modi government is opposed to same-sex marriage, stating in a legal affidavit that legalising it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as 'husband', a biological woman as 'wife' and children born out of union".[168]

Economic policies

The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the Jana Sangh, it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported swadeshi (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a protectionist export policy. However, it supported internal economic liberalisation, and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress.[169] During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards globalisation. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India.[169] This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch:[169] the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its swadeshi ideology.[169]

The two NDA governments in the period 1998–2004 introduced significant deregulation and privatisation of government-owned enterprises. It also introduced tariff-reducing measures. These reforms built off of the initial economic liberalisation introduced by the P. V. Narasimha Rao-led Congress government in the early 1990s.[170] India's GDP growth increased substantially during the tenure of the NDA. The 2004 campaign slogan India Shining was based on the party's belief that the free market would bring prosperity to all sectors of society.[171] After its unexpected defeat, commentators said that it was punished for neglecting the needs of the poor and focusing too much on its corporate allies.[104][105][172]

This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years.[173] Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development.[174][175] Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.[174]

The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a neoliberal framework.[176][177] Modi liberalised India's foreign direct investment policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways.[176][178][179] Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them;[177] some of these proposals were dropped after protests.[180] The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.[177] The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers.[176] Modi has been described as taking a more economically populist approach on healthcare and agricultural policy.[181] Modi's government has also been described as taking a more protectionist turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership talks[182][183] and introducing the 2020 Atmanirbhar Bharat economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.[184][185]

Defence and counterterrorism

Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism.[186][187] The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the Prevention of Terrorism Act, which later came under heavy criticism.[186][187] It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States' war on terror.[188]

Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised Pokhran-II, a series of five nuclear tests in 1998.[186] The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.[186]

The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying Kashmir territory, later known as the Kargil War.[189][190] Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.[189][190]

After the terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001, the NDA government passed the Prevention of Terrorism Act.[187] The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism.[187] It initially failed to pass in the Rajya Sabha; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a joint session of the Parliament, where the numerical superior Lok Sabha allowed the bill to pass.[187] The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism.[187] However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon civil liberties, and the National Human Rights Commission of India stated that it had been used to target Muslims.[187] It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.[191]

The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a 2015 Indian counter-insurgency operation in Myanmar against the National Socialist Council of Nagaland, the 2016 Indian Line of Control strike in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the 2019 Balakot airstrike in Pakistan.[192] It also militarily intervened in defence of Bhutan during the 2017 Doklam standoff with China.[193]

The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms.[194][195] In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War.[196] The Department of Military Affairs was also established and put under the CDS.[197]

Foreign policy

The historical stance of the BJP towards foreign policy, like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on aggressive Hindutva combined with economic protectionism.[198] The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the partition of India; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate.[198] This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology.[198][199] During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of non-alignment, and instead advocated closeness to the United States.[198] In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States,[200] while stressing a desire for a more multipolar world order.[201] Despite this, it has accused the U.S. State Department and "deep state" elements in the United States of attempting to destabilise India.[202]

The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it.[169][199] Its policy also represented a significant change from the Nehruvian idealism of previous governments, opting instead for realism.[203] His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the Delhi–Lahore Bus service.[198] Vajpayee signed the Lahore Declaration, which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests.[198] However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the 1999 Kargil War. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the Line of Control that marked the de facto border between the two countries.[198] Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak".[198] This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil Agra summit, preventing any significant deal from being reached.[198]

The Vajpayee government strongly opposed the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, with Vajpayee describing it as a "dance of destruction".[204][205] The Vajpayee administration later offered political support to the U.S. war on terror, in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons.[188] However, the BJP strongly condemned the 2003 invasion of Iraq, stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq".[206] In 2005, the BJP opposed the India–United States Civil Nuclear Agreement, which placed restrictions on India's nuclear program.[207] The BJP also opposed the 2011 military intervention in Libya and urged the Lok Sabha to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.[208]

The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with Nawaz Sharif's government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015.[209] Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017.[210] The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy.[211] In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared blockade on Nepal.[212] The Modi government expressed concern following the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a United Nations Security Council resolution regarding the situation there.[213][214] The Modi government remained neutral on the Russo-Ukrainian War,[215] abstaining from United Nations Security Council Resolution 2623, which condemned the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine.[216] The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.[217]

Disinformation and conspiracy theories

The BJP has frequently spread disinformation and relied on the demonisation of Muslims.[218] The use of fake news has been a part of the party's strategy. In September 2018, Amit Shah said at a party meeting in Rajasthan that the BJP IT cell had influenced the media during the 2017 Uttar Pradesh elections and added, "We should be capable of delivering any message to the public, whether sweet or sour, true or fake."[219]

In April 2024, the US State Department criticised the BJP for promoting antisemitic conspiracy theories involving George Soros.[220]

In December 2024, the French newspaper Mediapart condemned the BJP for falsifying its reports and added, "There are no facts available supporting the conspiracy theory promoted by BJP".[221]

Organisation and structure

A diagram of the structure of the Bharatiya Janata Party

The organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the president being the highest authority in the party.[139] Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term.[139] This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.[222]

Below the president is the National Executive, which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president.[139] An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.[139]

The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other Sangh Parivar-related organisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the Sangh Parivar:[139]

The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as:

  • The BJP Mahila Morcha (BJP Women's Front), its women's division[139]
  • The Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (Indian People's Youth Front), its youth wing[139]
  • The BJP Minority Morcha (BJP Minority Front), its minority division[139]

In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members[223][224] as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's largest political parties.[225] In September 2024, PM Modi initiated the BJP membership drive,[226] this campaign has been controversial for deceptive and coercive membership enrollment by BJP workers.[227] In Gujarat, minor school children have been enrolled as BJP members.[228]

General election results

The Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two Lok Sabha seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived.[50] In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions.[51] In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the Opposition whenever the party was not in power.[229][lower-alpha 7]

Seats Won by BJP in Indian General Elections (1984–2024)
Year Legislature Party leader Seats contested Seats won Change in seats Percentage
of votes
Vote swing Outcome Ref.
1984 8th Lok Sabha Atal Bihari Vajpayee 229
2 / 543
Increase 2 7.74% New Opposition [230]
1989 9th Lok Sabha Lal Krishna Advani 225
85 / 543
Increase 83 11.36% Increase 3.62% Outside support for NF [231]
1991 10th Lok Sabha 477
120 / 543
Increase 35 20.11% Increase 8.75% Official Opposition [232]
1996 11th Lok Sabha Atal Bihari Vajpayee 471
161 / 543
Increase 41 20.29% Increase 0.18% Coalition (1996) [233]
Official Opposition (1996–97) [233]
1998 12th Lok Sabha 388
182 / 543
Increase 21 25.59% Increase 5.30% Coalition [234]
1999 13th Lok Sabha 339
182 / 543
Steady 23.75% Decrease 1.84% Coalition [235]
2004 14th Lok Sabha Lal Krishna Advani 364
138 / 543
Decrease 44 22.16% Decrease 1.69% Official Opposition [236]
2009 15th Lok Sabha 433
116 / 543
Decrease 22 18.80% Decrease 3.36% Official Opposition [237]
2014 16th Lok Sabha Narendra Modi 428
282 / 543
Increase 166 31.34% Increase 12.54% Majority [238]
2019 17th Lok Sabha 436
303 / 543
Increase 21 37.46% Increase 6.12% Majority [239][240]
2024 18th Lok Sabha 441
240 / 543
Decrease 63 36.56% Decrease 0.8% Coalition [241]

Template:Vertical bar chart

Presence in states and Union Territories

The BJP has previously held power in Karnataka, Jharkhand and Himachal Pradesh. Also it has been the junior coalition partner in governments in Jammu and Kashmir (with the Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party), Punjab (with the Shiromani Akali Dal), and Tamil Nadu (with the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam). It has never held power in Kerala, Telangana, and West Bengal.[242][243][244]

In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the North-East Democratic Alliance.[245][246][247]

Legislature Seats Legislative leader Status
Upper House
Rajya Sabha
103 / 245
J. P. Nadda Government
Andhra Pradesh
1 / 58
Somu Veerraju Coalition
Bihar
22 / 75
Hari Sahni Government

Karnataka

30 / 75
Chalavadi Narayanaswamy Opposition

Maharashtra

22 / 78
Pravin Darekar Government

Telangana

3 / 40
A.Venkata Narayana Reddy Others

Uttar Pradesh

79 / 100
Keshav Prasad Maurya Government
Lower House
Andhra Pradesh
8 / 175
Penmetsa Vishnu Kumar Raju Coalition
Arunachal Pradesh
46 / 60
Pema Khandu Government
Assam
64 / 126
Himanta Biswa Sarma Government
Bihar
89 / 243
Samrat Choudhary Coalition
Chhattisgarh
54 / 90
Vishnu Deo Sai Government
Goa
27 / 40
Pramod Sawant Government
Gujarat
162 / 182
Bhupendrabhai Patel Government
Haryana
48 / 90
Nayab Singh Saini Government

Himachal Pradesh

28 / 68
Jai Ram Thakur Opposition

Jharkhand

21 / 81
Babulal Marandi Opposition

Karnataka

63 / 224
R. Ashoka Opposition

Kerala

0 / 140
No Representation

Madhya Pradesh

165 / 230
Mohan Yadav Government

Maharashtra

131 / 288
Devendra Fadnavis Government

Manipur

37 / 60
Y. Khemchand Singh Government

Meghalaya

2 / 60
Sanbor Shullai Coalition

Mizoram

2 / 40
K. Beichhua Others

Nagaland

11 / 60
Y. Patton Coalition

Odisha

79 / 147
Mohan Charan Majhi Government

Punjab

2 / 117
Ashwani Kumar Sharma Others

Rajasthan

118 / 200
Bhajan Lal Sharma Government

Sikkim

0 / 32
No Representation Alliance

Tamil Nadu

4 / 234
Nainar Nagendran Opposition

Telangana

8 / 119
Alleti Maheshwar Reddy Others

Tripura

33 / 60
Manik Saha Government

Uttar Pradesh

257 / 403
Yogi Adityanath Government

Uttarakhand

47 / 70
Pushkar Singh Dhami Government

West Bengal

65 / 294
Suvendu Adhikari Opposition
Delhi
48 / 70
Rekha Gupta Government

Jammu and Kashmir

29 / 90
Sunil Kumar Sharma Opposition

Puducherry

9 / 33
A. Namassivayam Coalition

List of heads of government

List of prime ministers

No. Portrait Prime minister Constituency Term in office Lok Sabha Cabinet
Start End Tenure
1 Atal Bihari Vajpayee Lucknow 16 May 1996 1 June 1996 16 days 11th Vajpayee I
19 March 1998 13 October 1999 6 years, 64 days 12th Vajpayee II
14 October 1999 22 May 2004 13th Vajpayee III
2 Narendra Modi Varanasi 26 May 2014 30 May 2019 12 years, 74 days 16th Modi I
30 May 2019 9 June 2024 17th Modi II
9 June 2024 Incumbent 18th Modi III

List of incumbent chief ministers

Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP

As of 22 February 2025, 55 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 14 of whom are incumbent.

Incumbent Chief Ministers from the BJP
No. State Portrait Name Cabinet Governing coalition
1 Arunachal Pradesh Pema Khandu Khandu V BJP
2 Assam Himanta Biswa Sarma Sarma I BJP
AGP
UPPL
BPF
3 Chhattisgarh Vishnu Deo Sai Sai I BJP
4 Goa Pramod Sawant Sawant II BJP
MGP
IND
5 Gujarat Bhupendrabhai Patel Patel II BJP
6 Haryana Nayab Singh Saini Saini II BJP
7 Madhya Pradesh Mohan Yadav Yadav I BJP
8 Maharashtra Devendra Fadnavis Fadnavis III BJP
SHS
NCP
JSS
RSP
RYSP
RSVA
IND
9 Manipur - Yumnam Khemchand Singh Yumnam Khemchand Singh ministry BJP
NPP
NPF
IND
10 Odisha Mohan Charan Majhi Majhi I BJP
11 Rajasthan Bhajan Lal Sharma Sharma I BJP
12 Tripura Manik Saha Saha II BJP
TMP
IPFT
13 Uttar Pradesh Yogi Adityanath Adityanath II BJP
AD(S)
RLD
NP
14 Uttarakhand Pushkar Singh Dhami Dhami II BJP
15 Delhi Rekha Gupta Gupta BJP

See also

References

Explanatory notes

  1. /bʱaːɾət̪iːjə dʒənət̪aː paːrtiː/
  2. in 2002
  3. Sharma (2019), p. 523: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."
  4. Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: "Nehru's response [to Patel's warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."
  5. Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
  6. Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
  7. For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.

Citations

  1. "Nitin Nabin elected national BJP president unopposed: To take charge January 20; PM Modi to attend event". Times of India. Retrieved 19 January 2026.
  2. "Bharatiya Janata Party Constitution". Bharatiya Janata Party. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2017. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  3. "BJP announces new parliamentary committee; Modi leader in Lok Sabha, Rajnath his deputy". India Today. 12 June 2019. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  4. "Leader of the House". Rajya Sabha. Retrieved 27 March 2025.
  5. "Rajesh Agarwal gets BJP treasurer post". United News of India. 27 September 2020. Archived from the original on 17 October 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  6. "What you need to know about India's BJP". Al Jazeera. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 13 May 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  7. Jain, Praveen (7 January 2024). "Murli Manohar Joshi turns 90: Well-wishers flock to Raisina Road to celebrate life of BJP stalwart". ThePrint. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
  8. "Bharat Ratna for Pranab, Nanaji Deshmukh and Bhupen Hazarika". Bihar Times. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
  9. Sir, Sp (29 April 2021). "K R Malkani - The Sindhu World Sindhi Author: The Sindh Story: Sindhi Politician: Political Mysteries". The Sindhu World. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
  10. कौन थे बीजेपी के इकलौते मुस्लिम फाउंडर सिकंदर बख्त? जानिए कैसे थामा पार्टी का साथ (in हिन्दी). 6 April 2024. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
  11. Jain, Devaki (14 August 2021). "The Maharani who founded the BJP". The Citizen (India).
  12. "Rajput votes at stake in Rajasthan, Bhairon Singh Shekhawat legacy a new front in BJP, Cong battle". The Indian Express. 22 May 2023. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 "BJP's foundation day: Brief history of the achievements and failures of the party". The Indian Express. 6 April 2019. Archived from the original on 11 May 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  14. "BJP Gets A New Address; Soul Of New Office Is The Party Worker, Says PM Modi". NDTV. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  15. Siddhartha Rai (27 January 2017). "PM Modi goes cashless, buys lifetime subscription of BJP mouthpiece Kamal Sandesh through cheque". India Today. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  16. Sengupta, Tamal. "Bengal BJP revamps party mouthpiece before 2018 panchayet elections". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
  17. "Public Policy Research Centre". Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 22 July 2020.
  18. Template:Multiref
  19. "BJP youth wing launches its campaign for party's Lok Sabha poll win". The Economic Times. 19 January 2019. Archived from the original on 12 October 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  20. "Quota for women in council of ministers among Mahila Morcha's suggestions for BJP poll manifesto". Economic Times. 5 April 2019. Archived from the original on 7 June 2022. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  21. Pragya Singh (15 January 2008). "Need to Know BJP-led BMS is biggest labour union in India". live mint. Archived from the original on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  22. Rajkumar. सरकार की नीतियों को किसानों तक पहुंचाएगा बीजेपी किसान मोर्चा. m.patrika.com. Archived from the original on 19 October 2020. Retrieved 8 August 2020.
  23. * Johnson, Matthew; Garnett, Mark; Walker, David M (2017). Conservatism and Ideology. Routledge. pp. 45–50. ISBN 978-1-317-52900-2. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
  24. * Mazumdar, Surajit (2017). "Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India". Desenvolvimento Em Debate. 5 (1): 115–131. doi:10.51861/ded.dmds.1.011. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022.
  25. * Chatterji, Angana P.; Hansen, Thomas Blom; Jaffrelot, Christophe (2019). Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India. Oxford University Press. pp. 100–130. ISBN 978-0-19-007817-1. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
  26. * Henrik Berglund. "Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP." Economic and Political Weekly 39, no. 10 (2004): 1064–70. JSTOR 4414737.
  27. Template:Multiref
  28. 28.0 28.1 Malik & Singh 1992, pp. 318–336; Banerjee 2005, p. 3118; BBC 2012.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Davies, Peter; Lynch, Derek (16 August 2005). The Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right. Routledge. p. 103. ISBN 978-1-134-60952-9.
  30. "International Democrat Union » Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU)". International Democracy Union. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 12 June 2017.
  31. Iwanek, Krzysztof (10 September 2018). "Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  32. Election Commission 2013.
  33. Devesh Kumar (20 May 2014). "BJP + 29 Parties=National Democratic Alliance". NDTV. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  34. "BJP seals alliances in Northeast, aims 22 LS seats". The Hindu Business Line. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  35. India Today Video Desk (2 March 2025). "Our alliance is not going to break: Eknath Shinde dismisses rift rumours". India Today. Retrieved 27 March 2025.
  36. "Party Position pdf" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  37. "BJP's Rajya Sabha Tally Dips, NDA Now 4 Below Majority Mark".
  38. "Alphabetical Party Position in the Rajya Sabha". Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
  39. "Strengthwise Party Position in the Rajya Sabha". Rajya Sabha. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017.
  40. "BJP gains back Madhya Pradesh in just 15 months after losing it". India Today. 26 November 2019. Archived from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  41. "In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress". The Times of India. 19 May 2016. Archived from the original on 5 November 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
  42. "Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the barrister who founded Bharatiya Janta Party". India Today. 6 July 2019. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
  43. "Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303". Zee News. 25 May 2019. Archived from the original on 2 June 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  44. "Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch". Business Standard. 17 March 2019. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
  45. Sharma, Mukul (2023). "Hindu Nationalism and Right-wing Ecology: RSS, Modi and Motherland Post-2014". Studies in Indian Politics. 11: 102–117. doi:10.1177/23210230231166197.
  46. Banerjee 2005, p. 3118.
  47. Malik & Singh 1992, p. 318.
  48. Swain 2001, p. 60.
  49. Subba, Chhawang (4 April 2022). "Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and the Role of Bharatiya Jana Sangh in Indian Politics" (PDF). IJCRT. p. a570. ISSN 2320-2882. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 February 2024. Retrieved 21 February 2024.
  50. 50.0 50.1 50.2 50.3 Guha 2007, p. 633.
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 51.3 Sen 2005, pp. 251–272.
  52. 52.0 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 Bhatty, Kiran; Sundar, Nandini (17 September 2020). "Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime". International Sociology. 35 (6). SAGE Publications: 632–650. doi:10.1177/0268580920937226. ISSN 0268-5809. S2CID 224896271.
  53. 53.0 53.1 Hindle, Garry; Lindberg, Staffan (2020). "New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party" (PDF). V-Dem Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  54. 54.0 54.1 Alizada, Nazifa; Cole, Rowan; Gastaldi, Lisa; Grahn, Sandra; Hellmeier, Sebastian; Kolvani, Palina; Lachapelle, Jean; Lührmann, Anna; Maerz, Seraphine F.; Pillai, Shreeya; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2021), "Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021" (PDF), University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute, pp. 20–21, archived from the original (PDF) on 14 September 2021
  55. 55.0 55.1 Sirnate, Vasundhara (27 November 2021). "The democratic backsliding of India". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 30 August 2022.
  56. 56.0 56.1 Das, Sabyasachi (3 July 2023). "Democratic Backsliding in the World's Largest Democracy". Ashoka University. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  57. Banerjee-Fischer, Joanna (27 January 2024). "What do India's political logos symbolize?". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 24 March 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  58. Suraiya, Jug. "NaMo and the lotus". The Times of India. ISSN 0971-8257. Archived from the original on 24 March 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  59. 59.0 59.1 Kabool Ahmad (6 April 2023). "BJP's 43 years: How it emerged from Jana Sangh and became world's largest party". India Today. Archived from the original on 2 January 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  60. 60.0 60.1 60.2 "Ram Temple inauguration: Advent of a new era, says PM Modi". Hindustan Times. 22 January 2024. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  61. 61.0 61.1 Iwanek, Krzysztof. "Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  62. Noorani 1978, p. 216.
  63. Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 116–119.
  64. 64.0 64.1 Guha 2007, p. 136.
  65. 65.0 65.1 Guha 2007, p. 250.
  66. Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 122–126, 129–130.
  67. Guha 2007, pp. 250, 352, 413.
  68. Guha 2007, pp. 427–428.
  69. 69.0 69.1 Guha 2007, pp. 538–540.
  70. Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 282–283.
  71. Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 292–301, 312.
  72. Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 301–312.
  73. "Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born". The Indian Express. 7 April 2020 [7 April 1980]. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
  74. 74.0 74.1 74.2 74.3 74.4 74.5 74.6 Malik & Singh 1992, pp. 318–336.
  75. Guha 2007, p. 579.
  76. Pai 1996, pp. 1170–1183.
  77. Jha 2003.
  78. Flint 2005, p. 165.
  79. Guha 2007, pp. 582–598.
  80. Guha 2007, p. 635.
  81. Guha 2007, p. 636.
  82. 82.0 82.1 82.2 82.3 82.4 82.5 82.6 Guha 2007, pp. 633–659.
  83. NDTV 2012.
  84. 84.0 84.1 84.2 84.3 Al Jazeera 2009.
  85. "All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case: Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it". The Hindu. 30 September 2020. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
  86. Afzhal Khan, Arshad (9 November 2024). "Ayodhya's Ram temple to take 3 more months, to be completed by September 2025". The Times of India. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 10 February 2025.
  87. Sen 2005, p. 254.
  88. rediff.com 1998.
  89. Outlook 2013.
  90. Kattakayam 2012.
  91. India Today 2001.
  92. Tehelka 2001.
  93. Ghassem-Fachandi 2012, pp. 1–31.
  94. 94.0 94.1 Jaffrelot 2013, p. 16.
  95. Harris 2012.
  96. Krishnan & Shams 2012.
  97. Krishnan, Murali; Shams, Shamil (11 March 2012). "Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 17 January 2016.
  98. Hindustan Times 2014.
  99. NDTV.com 2012.
  100. "Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence". India Today. 20 April 2018. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
  101. Brass 2005, pp. 385–393.
  102. Gupta 2011, p. 252.
  103. Nussbaum 2008, p. 2.
  104. 104.0 104.1 104.2 Ramesh 2004.
  105. 105.0 105.1 The Hindu 2004.
  106. Hindustan Times 2009.
  107. Mathew 2014.
  108. Deccan Chronicle 2014.
  109. BBC & May 2014.
  110. 110.0 110.1 110.2 110.3 110.4 110.5 Sridharan 2014.
  111. Times of India 2014.
  112. Diwakar 2014.
  113. 113.0 113.1 Varshney 2014.
  114. Sen, Suhit K. "BJP, which mocks Congress, has fallen prey to extreme centralisation". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
  115. "All the PM's people: How Modi is shaping BJP organisationally, redefining 'party democracy'". The Indian Express. 18 December 2023. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
  116. "Amit Shah's elevation as BJP President signals a generational change and Modi's complete takeover of the party". India Today. 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
  117. Chaturvedi, Rakesh Mohan (22 March 2014). "Narendra Modi sidelines old guard in BJP; Jaswant Singh gearing up to contest from Barmer as Independent". The Economic Times. ISSN 0013-0389. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
  118. Pillalamarri, Akhilesh. "India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
  119. "Stephen Harper's Global Alliance of Conservative Parties Quietly Scrubbed India Off Its Website". PressProgress. 5 February 2024. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
  120. "BJP Conspicuous by Absence from Global Centre-Right Political Parties' Alliance". The Wire. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
  121. Karmakar, Rahul (31 December 2018). "2018 was a landmark year for BJP, women in Northeast". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 14 February 2024. Retrieved 14 February 2024.
  122. Akhtar, Rais; Kirk, William. "Jammu and Kashmir, State, India". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 20 August 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2019. Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947.
  123. Osmańczyk, Edmund Jan (2003). "Jammu and Kashmir.". In Mango, Anthony (ed.). Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements. Vol. 2: G–M (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 1189. ISBN 978-0-415-93922-5. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2020. Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China.
  124. 124.0 124.1 Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained Archived 12 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, 11 December 2019.
  125. 125.0 125.1 "Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019". Archived from the original on 16 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  126. 126.0 126.1 126.2 126.3 Slater, Joanna (18 December 2019). "Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 18 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
  127. Bajpaee, Chietigj (April 2024). "What Democratic Backsliding Means for India". Chatham House. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  128. Biswas, Soutik (16 March 2021). "'Electoral autocracy': The downgrading of India's democracy". BBC.
  129. Bala, Sumathi (16 May 2024). "Modi's strongman rule raises questions about India's 'democratic decline' as he seeks a third term". CNBC.
  130. "Interview with Indira Gandhi". TV Eye. 18 December 2016. Archived from the original on 11 August 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
  131. "Recalling the Emergency years". The Indian Express. 29 June 2015. Archived from the original on 31 May 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
  132. Mogul, Rhea (15 April 2024). "Narendra Modi: India's popular but controversial leader seeking a transformative third term". CNN. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
  133. Mehrotra, Karishma; Shih, Gerry (20 April 2024). "As India votes, women and the young could put Modi and BJP over the top". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
  134. "Modi's Hindu Nationalist Agenda Is Corroding India's Democracy". World Politics Review. 30 October 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2024.
  135. Gill, Martin (22 June 2022). The Handbook of Security. Springer Nature. p. 158. ISBN 978-3-030-91735-7.
  136. Leidig, Eviane; Mudde, Cas (9 May 2023). "Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): The overlooked populist radical right party". Journal of Language and Politics. 22 (3): 360–377. doi:10.1075/jlp.22134.lei. ISSN 1569-2159.
  137. Ammassari, Sofia; Fossati, Diego; McDonnell, Duncan (2023). "Supporters of India's BJP: Distinctly Populist and Nativist". Government and Opposition. 58 (4): 807–823. doi:10.1017/gov.2022.18. hdl:10072/415334. ISSN 0017-257X.
  138. Hansen 1999, p. 85.
  139. 139.00 139.01 139.02 139.03 139.04 139.05 139.06 139.07 139.08 139.09 139.10 139.11 Swain 2001, pp. 71–104.
  140. 140.0 140.1 140.2 140.3 140.4 Seshia 1998, pp. 1036–1050.
  141. 141.0 141.1 141.2 141.3 141.4 Gillan 2002, pp. 73–95.
  142. 142.0 142.1 Sen 2005, p. 63.
  143. International Religious Freedom Report 2005.
  144. The Hindu 2002.
  145. Davies 2005.
  146. BBC & January 2014.
  147. "Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul". The Economist. 2 March 2019. Archived from the original on 1 March 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
  148. 148.0 148.1 Ganguly, Sumit (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead". Journal of Democracy. 25 (4): 56–60. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0077. S2CID 154421269.
  149. Joshua, Anita (16 July 2014). "Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 2 December 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  150. Mukul, Akshaya (18 July 2014). "Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 21 July 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  151. Bhatty, Kiran (2019). "School education: Denials and delusions". In Azad, Rohit; Chakraborty, Shouvik; Ramani, Srinivasan; Sinha, Dipa (eds.). A quantum leap in the wrong direction?. ISBN 978-93-5287-618-1. OCLC 1089418969.
  152. "Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union". pib.gov.in. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  153. Article 370 rendered toothless, Article 35A ceases to exist Archived 30 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine, The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.
  154. "The Gazette of India" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  155. Ramachandran 2003.
  156. "Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist". ThePrint. 17 March 2021. Archived from the original on 18 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
  157. Regan, Helen; Gupta, Swati; Khan, Omar. "India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims". CNN. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2023. The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries.
  158. Gringlas, Sam. "India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims". NPR. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
  159. Ellis-Peterson, Hannah; Azizur Rahman, Shaikh (16 March 2020), "Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots", The Guardian, Delhi, archived from the original on 17 March 2020, retrieved 17 March 2020
  160. Gettleman, Jeffrey; Abi-Habib, Maria (1 March 2020), "In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse", The New York Times, archived from the original on 6 March 2020, retrieved 1 March 2020
  161. Gettleman, Jeffrey; Yasir, Sameer; Raj, Suhasini; Kumar, Hari (12 March 2020), "'If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims", The New York Times, Photographs by Loke, Atul, archived from the original on 13 March 2020, retrieved 13 March 2020
  162. Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (6 March 2020), "In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn", The Washington Post, archived from the original on 7 March 2020, retrieved 6 March 2020
  163. Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (2 March 2020), "What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India", The Washington Post, archived from the original on 3 March 2020, retrieved 15 March 2020
  164. Times of India 2013.
  165. Buncombe 2014.
  166. Ramaseshan 2013.
  167. Business Standard 2014.
  168. "Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman'". The Independent. 25 February 2021. Archived from the original on 17 January 2023. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
  169. 169.0 169.1 169.2 169.3 169.4 Shulman 2000, pp. 365–390.
  170. Tiwari 2012.
  171. Guha 2007, pp. 710–720.
  172. Sen 2005, p. 70.
  173. Sheela Bhatt 2014.
  174. 174.0 174.1 Bobbio 2012, pp. 652–668.
  175. Jaffrelot 2013, pp. 79–95.
  176. 176.0 176.1 176.2 Ruparelia, Sanjay (12 January 2016). "'Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 755–775. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974. ISSN 0085-6401. S2CID 155182560.
  177. 177.0 177.1 177.2 Shah, Alpa; Lerche, Jens (10 October 2015). "India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion". Economic & Political Weekly. 50 (41): 33–36. Archived from the original on 28 March 2023. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
  178. "Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways". The Times of India. 7 August 2014. Archived from the original on 7 August 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  179. Zhong, Raymond (20 November 2014). "Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough?". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 29 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  180. "Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls". The Economic Times. 14 March 2018. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 6 February 2019.
  181. "Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind". The Nikkei. Archived from the original on 20 August 2018. Retrieved 20 August 2018.
  182. "Why India opted out of world's biggest today". Times of India. 15 November 2020. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  183. "Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa". Nikkei. 3 December 2020. Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021. India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism.
  184. "Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era". Financial Times. 23 November 2020. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022.
  185. "India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn". Bloomberg. 19 February 2020. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  186. 186.0 186.1 186.2 186.3 Ganguly 1999, pp. 148–177.
  187. 187.0 187.1 187.2 187.3 187.4 187.5 187.6 Krishnan 2004, pp. 1–37.
  188. 188.0 188.1 Kux 2002, pp. 93–106.
  189. 189.0 189.1 Qadir 2002, pp. 1–10.
  190. 190.0 190.1 Abbas 2004, p. 173.
  191. Times of India 2002.
  192. "Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar". The Economic Times. 11 July 2018. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
  193. "Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered?". The Quint. 14 October 2017. Archived from the original on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
  194. Mukherjee, Anit (5 May 2021). "The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military". War on the Rocks. Archived from the original on 6 November 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
  195. "BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways". The Financial Express (India). 8 April 2019. Archived from the original on 6 November 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
  196. "Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech". India Today. 16 August 2019. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
  197. Singh, Rahul (24 December 2019). "Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 3 October 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
  198. 198.0 198.1 198.2 198.3 198.4 198.5 198.6 198.7 198.8 Chaulia 2002, pp. 215–234.
  199. 199.0 199.1 Harris 2005, pp. 7–27.
  200. Inbar, Efraim (2016). US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century. Taylor & Francis. p. 155.
  201. "Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar". The Hindu. 19 September 2020. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  202. "Modi's BJP says US State Department targeting India". Reuters. 6 December 2024.
  203. Lall 2006.
  204. Pradhan, Sharat. Vajpayee condemns NATO war in Kosovo. Archived 18 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine. Rediff, 29 March 1999.
  205. Faiola, Anthony. Yugoslavia Air Campaign Ignites Anti-U.S. Sentiment. Archived 15 March 2018 at the Wayback Machine. The Washington Post, 18 May 1999.
  206. "BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War". Arab News. 5 April 2003. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  207. "IndianExpress.com :: Renegotiate 123: Advani gives in to pressure from party". Archived from the original on 15 December 2007. Retrieved 11 July 2008.
  208. "Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs". The Hindu. 23 March 2011. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  209. "India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit". BBC. 25 December 2015. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  210. "PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death". Times of India. 18 December 2020. Archived from the original on 22 December 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  211. "The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand?". Scroll.in. 26 February 2019. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  212. "Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade". NDTV. 15 November 2015. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
  213. Martin, Michael (22 November 2021). "Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta". Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  214. Haidar, Suhasini (22 December 2022). "India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  215. "Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers". Livemint. 10 March 2022. Archived from the original on 13 January 2023. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
  216. "Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China'". Hindustan Times. 26 February 2022. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  217. "Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions". The Times of India. 3 March 2022. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  218. Bhattacharyya, Indradeep (1 May 2024). "BJP's 2024 poll campaign is riding on disinformation and Muslim vilification". Alt News. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
  219. Jaffrelot, Christophe; Schoch, C. (2023). Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy. Princeton University Press. p. 329. ISBN 978-0-691-24790-8. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
  220. "US State Dept Accuses India of Anti-Semitism for Pushing Conspiracies Against George Soros". The Wire. 6 October 2023. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
  221. The Hindu Bureau (9 December 2024). "BJP spreading 'fake news', says French media house Mediapart". The Hindu. Retrieved 10 December 2024.
  222. Times of India 2012.
  223. "BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party". Sydney Morning Herald. 16 October 2022. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
  224. "How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades". The Times of India. 16 April 2022. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
  225. "Narendra Modi's Message to America". National Review. 23 June 2022. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023. His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or "Indian People's Party") is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development.
  226. "BJP membership drive from September 1, usually precedes polls to elect party chief". The Hindu. 17 August 2024. Retrieved 24 September 2024.
  227. "Madhya Pradesh: Man claims he was thrashed for refusing to become BJP member; 4 booked". Deccan Herald.
  228. Langa, Mahesh (19 September 2024). "BJP membership drive hits controversies in Gujarat". The Hindu. Retrieved 24 September 2024.
  229. National Informatics Centre 2014.
  230. Election Commission 1984.
  231. Election Commission 1989.
  232. Election Commission 1991.
  233. 233.0 233.1 Election Commission 1996.
  234. Election Commission 1998.
  235. Election Commission 1999.
  236. Election Commission 2004.
  237. Election Commission 2009.
  238. Election Commission 2014.
  239. Kumar, Sanjay (28 May 2019). "BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 3 December 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
  240. "20. Performance of National Parties". Election Commission of India. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved 21 December 2020.
  241. Mogul, Rhea (4 June 2024). "Modi declares victory in India elections but party faces shock losses in parliament and will need coalition". CNN.
  242. Govind, Biju (28 September 2022). "Kerala: the ever-elusive State for the BJP". The Hindu – via www.thehindu.com.
  243. Unnithan, P. S. Gopikrishnan (6 February 2019). "Not happening: BJP won't rule Kerala, feels party's only MLA from the state". India Today.
  244. "BJP will not win in Bengal by insulting Bengalis: CM Mamata Banerjee". The Times of India. 5 September 2025 – via The Economic Times - The Times of India.
  245. Pisharoty, Sangeeta Barooah (25 May 2016). "BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt'". The Wire. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016.
  246. "Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance". Hindustan Times. 25 May 2016. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016.
  247. "BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge". Archived from the original on 25 May 2016.

General and cited sources

Further reading

External links