Created by Flying Bee
Last edited March 13, 2026
UpdateBot (talk | contribs)
robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)
Asis (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Form of affirmative action}}
{{Short description|Form of affirmative action}}
{{Distinguish|Indian reservation|Indian reserve|text=[[Indian reservation]]s of Native Americans (dubbed "Indians") in the United States or [[Indian reserve]]s of First Nations (dubbed "Indians") in Canada; For other topics, see [[Indian reserve (disambiguation)]].}}
{{Distinguish|Indian reservation|Indian reserve|text=[[Indian reservation]]s of Native Americans (dubbed "Indians") in the United States or [[Indian reserve]]s of First Nations (dubbed "Indians") in Canada}}
{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2019}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2016}}


'''Reservation''' is a system of [[affirmative action]] in [[India]] that provides historically disadvantaged groups representation in education, employment and politics. Based on provisions in the [[Constitution of India|Indian Constitution]], it allows the [[Government of India|Union Government]] and also the [[States and Territories of India]] to set ''reserved quotas or seats'', which lower the qualifications needed in exams, job openings etc. for "socially and educationally backward citizens."<ref>{{Cite web|title=Reservation Is About Adequate Representation, Not Poverty Eradication|url=https://thewire.in/law/supreme-court-bench-reservation|access-date=2020-12-19|website=The Wire}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Rajagopal|first=Krishnadas|date=2020-06-11|title=Right to reservation is not a fundamental right, observes SC judge as parties withdraw plea for quota|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/right-to-reservation-is-not-fundamental-right-observes-judge-as-tn-parties-withdraw-plea-for-obc-quota-in-medical-courses/article31807732.ece|access-date=2020-12-19|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
'''Reservation''' is a system of [[affirmative action]] in India that was established during the [[British Raj]]. Based on provisions in the [[Constitution of India|Indian constitution]], it allows the [[Government of India|union government]] and the [[States and Territories of India|states and union territories of India]] to allocate a specific percentage of '''''reserved quotas''' or '''seats''''', in higher education admissions, employment, [[Reserved political positions in India|political bodies]], etc., for "socially and economically backward citizens".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Soren |first=Chunuram |date=May 2022 |title=RESERVATION IN INDIA: RHETORIC AND REALITY |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354024192 |journal=International Journal of Advanced Research |volume=10 |issue=5}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Reservation Is About Adequate Representation, Not Poverty Eradication|url=https://thewire.in/law/supreme-court-bench-reservation|access-date=2020-12-19|website=The Wire}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Rajagopal|first=Krishnadas|date=2020-06-11|title=Right to reservation is not a fundamental right, observes SC judge as parties withdraw plea for quota|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/right-to-reservation-is-not-fundamental-right-observes-judge-as-tn-parties-withdraw-plea-for-obc-quota-in-medical-courses/article31807732.ece|access-date=2020-12-19|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> Since its implementation, reservation has been a subject of massive debates and controversies over its impact, execution and effectiveness, significantly shaping the agendas of political parties and the actions of social groups.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-08-27 |title=Reservation as a political imperative |url=https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/reservation-as-a-political-imperative/article32404792.ece |website=Frontline |language=en}}</ref>


== Terms ==
==History of reservation==
{{Unreferenced Section|date=April 2020}}
Reservation is primarily given to all 4 groups: [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes|Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes]], [[Other Backward Class]]es, [[Economically Weaker Section]], abbreviated as SC, ST, OBC, EWS respectively. Originally only SC and ST communities were eligible for reservation. In 1987, it was extended to include OBCs after the implementation of the [[Mandal Commission]] report. In 2019, reservation was extended for Economically Weaker Section within the General Category.


* The first are the [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes|Scheduled Castes]]. These communities were variously seen as at the bottom or "underneath" the [[Caste system in India|caste system]] in South Asia, below even the ''[[shudra]]'' varna. These castes had hereditary professions such as agricultural labourers, manual scavenging, tannery, washing clothes, daily wage workers, fishing and more. They were subjected to the practice of [[untouchability]], which takes the form of various social restrictions ranging from inability to touch other castes to inability to use the same water source or even live in the same area. Today many of these castes are landless labourers.
===Before independence===
* The next group are the [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes|Scheduled Tribes]]. The definition of this group varies, but the criteria for a Scheduled Tribe "indications of primitive traits, distinctive culture, geographical isolation, shyness of contact with the community at large, and backwardness." Most of these groups are considered [[Adivasi]]s, and the original inhabitants while others are nomadic tribes who were notified as "criminal tribes" under British rule. They range in modes of existence from subsistence agriculturalists who have had interaction between the outside world to hunter-gatherer groups still in the jungles. Many of them frequently had their lands [[Exploitation of labour|exploited]] by the British during the [[Colonial India|colonial era]]. However, in the Northeast, many of the tribes are relatively better-off and possess interaction with the outside world. Examples include the [[Boro people|Bodo]], [[Gondi people|Gond]], [[Banjara]], and [[Santal people|Santal]].
Quota systems favouring certain castes and other communities existed before [[Independence of India|independence]] in the [[British Raj]]. Demands for various forms of positive discrimination has been made, for example, in 1881 and 1891.<ref name="ILI Law Review">{{cite web|url=http://www.ili.ac.in/pdf/article_2.pdf|title=Rethinking Reservation in Higher EDUCATION in India|last=Laskar|first=Mehbubul Hassan|publisher=ILI Law Review|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120425081633/http://www.ili.ac.in/pdf/article_2.pdf|archive-date=25 April 2012 |pages=29–30}}</ref> [[Shahu of Kolhapur|Chatrapati Shahu]] (aka Rajarshi Shahu Maharaj), the Maharaja of the [[princely state]] of [[Kolhapur State|Kolhapur]], introduced reservation in favor of non-[[Brahmin]] and backward classes, much of which came into effect in 1902. He provided free education to everyone and opened several hostels to make it easier for them to receive it. He also tried to ensure that people thus educated were suitably employed, and he appealed both for a class-free India and the abolition of [[untouchability]]. His 1902 measures created 50 percent reservation for educationally deprived communities.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Ghadyalpatil|first=Abhiram|date=2018-08-10|title=Rajarshi Shahu Chhatrapati of Kolhapur, a reformer ahead of his time|url=https://www.livemint.com/Leisure/PLkr7jdpCeZepho8RMVJbN/Rajarshi-Shahu-Chhatrapati-of-Kolhapur-a-reformer-ahead-of.html|access-date=2021-10-02|website=mint|language=en}}</ref> In 1918, at the behest of several non-Brahmin organizations criticizing Brahmin domination of administration, the Mysore Raja [[Krishna Raja Wadiyar IV|Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar]] created a committee to implement reservations for non-Brahmins in government jobs and education over the opposition of his Diwan [[M. Visvesvaraya|M. Viswesvaraya]], who resigned in protest.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Reserved uncertainty or deserved certainty? Reservation debate back in Mysuru|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/2020/feb/17/reserved-uncertainty-or-deserved-certainty-reservation-debate-back-in-mysuru-2104413.html|access-date=2021-11-21|website=The New Indian Express|date=17 February 2020 }}</ref> On 16 September 1921, the first [[Justice Party (India)|Justice Party]] government passed the first Communal Government Order (G. O. # 613), thereby becoming the first elected body in the Indian legislative history to legislate reservations, which have since become standard across the country.
* The third main group are the [[Other Backward Class]]es. They were not originally in the reservation scheme, but during the [[premiership of Morarji Desai]], the [[Mandal Commission]] studied all the communities in India to find what castes were "backward" compared to the general population. Based on [[Census of India prior to independence|1931 census data]], they estimated 52% of India's population belonged to castes that were "backward" due to various socio-economic factors like wealth or traditional occupation. The possibility for providing reservation to these people was allowed for in Article 15(4) and Article 16(4), which states the government can provide reservation to "backward classes." Although the center maintains its own list of OBC's, comprising over 5,000 castes and subcastes, each state can create their own backward caste list for in-state reservations. Most OBCs were classified originally in the ''[[shudra]]'' varna and have low ritual status, apart from being economically deprived. However, there are other castes in the OBC list who, although ritually low, are considered "dominant castes" for numerical strength and in many cases are the enforcers of the caste hierarchy, including some Brahmin groups.
In some states like Bihar or Tamil Nadu, there is a divide between backward castes, who face some socio-economic disadvantage and most backward or extremely backward castes, who face a high amount of social discrimination barely above Dalits in their status. In fact, unlike Scheduled Castes, OBCs do not have to be Hindu and many states give benefits to some Muslim and Christian communities. This list is most subject to change since the criteria are not as stringent, making it a list often added by politicians to please certain sections of their voters.


Those who are not a member of these groups are commonly known as General category, sometimes called the Other category (Other Caste). General Category contains mostly high castes who cannot avail reservations: most communities in the [[Brahmin]], [[Kshatriya]] and [[Vaishya]] varnas. However, there are also some communities classified as shudra varna, as well as most Muslim and Christian communities, who are part of this category. Communities belonging to this category often had hereditary professions such as [[pujari]], [[zamindar]], kings, doctors, and soldiers, and often owned agricultural land.
The [[Parliament of the United Kingdom|Imperial parliament at Westminster]] introduced elements of reservation in the [[Indian Councils Act 1909]] and there were many other measures put in place prior to independence.<ref name="ILI Law Review" /> The depressed classes were provided some seats in 1919 before seeing further increase in 1925.<ref name="q721">{{cite book | last1=Boris | first1=E. | last2=Janssens | first2=A. | title=Complicating Categories: Gender, Class, Race and Ethnicity | publisher=Cambridge University Press | series=International Review of Social History Supplements | year=1999 | isbn=978-0-521-78641-6 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YWPGs-KXry4C&pg=PA59| page=59}}</ref>


==History==
In 1927, the [[Madras Presidency]] provided 44% reservation to Non-Brahmin Hindus, 16% to Brahmins, Muslims, Christians, and Anglo-Indians, and 8% to Scheduled Castes.<ref name="e289">{{cite book | last=Kandasamy | first=W.B.V. | title=Reservation for Other Backward Classes in Indian Central Government Institutions Like IITs, IIMs and AIIMS – A Study of the Role of Media Fuzzy Super FRM Models: A Study of the Role of Media Using Fuzzy Super Frm Models | publisher=Editura CuArt | year=2009 | isbn=978-1-59973-092-9 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JrfdBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA212| page=212}}</ref><ref name="m317">{{cite web | title=69 percent quota: Advantage TN | website=The New Indian Express | date=2010-07-14 | url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2010/Jul/14/69-percent-quota-advantage-tn-169690.html}}</ref>


===Before independence===
During the [[Round Table Conferences (India)|Round Table Conference of June 1932]], the Prime Minister of Britain, [[Ramsay MacDonald]], proposed the [[Communal Award]], according to which separate representation was to be provided for [[Muslims]], [[Sikhs]], [[Indian Christians]], [[Anglo-Indians]], and [[Europeans]]. The disadvantaged classes, roughly corresponding to the STs (Scheduled Tribes) and SCs (Scheduled Castes), were assigned a number of seats to be filled by election from constituencies in which only they could vote, although they could also vote in other seats. The proposal was controversial: [[Mahatma Gandhi]] fasted in protest against it but many among the depressed classes, including [[B. R. Ambedkar]], had to favor it. After negotiations, Gandhi reached an agreement with Ambedkar to have a single Hindu electorate, with backward classes having more seats reserved within it. Electorates for other religions, such as Islam and Sikhism, remained separate. This became known as the [[Poona Pact]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Transfer of Power in India |first=V. P. |last=Menon |edition=Reprinted |publisher=Orient Blackswan |year=1957 |isbn=978-81-250-0884-2 |pages=49–50 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hxdwpfLfEeoC&pg=PA49}}</ref>
Quota systems favouring certain castes and other communities existed before [[Independence of India|independence]] in several areas of [[British India]]. Demands for various forms of positive discrimination had been made, for example, in 1882 and 1891.<ref name="ILI Law Review">{{cite web|url=http://www.ili.ac.in/pdf/article_2.pdf|title=Rethinking Reservation in Higher EDUCATION in India|last=Laskar|first=Mehbubul Hassan|publisher=ILI Law Review|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120425081633/http://www.ili.ac.in/pdf/article_2.pdf|archive-date=25 April 2012 |pages=29–30}}</ref> [[Shahu of Kolhapur|Rajarshi Shahu]], the Maharaja of the [[princely state]] of [[Kolhapur State|Kolhapur]], introduced reservation in favor of non-[[Brahmin]] and backward classes, much of which came into force in 1902. He provided free education to everyone and opened several hostels to make it easier for them to receive it. He also tried to ensure that people thus educated were suitably employed, and he appealed both for a class-free India and the abolition of [[untouchability]]. His 1902 measures created 50 percent reservation for backward communities.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Ghadyalpatil|first=Abhiram|date=2018-08-10|title=Rajarshi Shahu Chhatrapati of Kolhapur, a reformer ahead of his time|url=https://www.livemint.com/Leisure/PLkr7jdpCeZepho8RMVJbN/Rajarshi-Shahu-Chhatrapati-of-Kolhapur-a-reformer-ahead-of.html|access-date=2021-10-02|website=mint|language=en}}</ref> In 1918, at the behest of several non-Brahmin organizations criticizing Brahmin domination of administration, the Mysore Raja [[Krishna Raja Wadiyar IV|Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar]] created a committee to implement reservations for non-Brahmins in government jobs and education over the opposition of his Diwan [[M. Visvesvaraya|M. Viswesvaraya]], who resigned in protest.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Reserved uncertainty or deserved certainty? Reservation debate back in Mysuru|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/2020/feb/17/reserved-uncertainty-or-deserved-certainty-reservation-debate-back-in-mysuru-2104413.html|access-date=2021-11-21|website=The New Indian Express}}</ref> On 16 September 1921, the first [[Justice Party (India)|Justice Party]] government passed the first Communal Government Order (G. O. # 613), thereby becoming the first elected body in the Indian legislative history to legislate reservations, which have since become standard across the country.


The [[British Raj]] introduced elements of reservation in the [[Indian Councils Act 1909|Government of India Act of 1909]] and there were many other measures put in place prior to independence.<ref name="ILI Law Review" /> A significant one emerged from the [[Round Table Conferences (India)|Round Table Conference of June 1932]], when the Prime Minister of Britain, [[Ramsay MacDonald]], proposed the [[Communal Award]], according to which separate representation was to be provided for [[Muslims]], [[Sikhs]], [[Indian Christians]], [[Anglo-Indians]], and [[Europeans]]. The depressed classes, roughly corresponding to the STs and SCs, were assigned a number of seats to be filled by election from constituencies in which only they could vote, although they could also vote in other seats. The proposal was controversial: [[Mahatma Gandhi]] fasted in protest against it but many among the depressed classes, including [[B. R. Ambedkar]], favored it. After negotiations, Gandhi reached an agreement with Ambedkar to have a single Hindu electorate, with [[Dalits]] having seats reserved within it. Electorates for other religions, such as Islam and Sikhism, remained separate. This became known as the [[Poona Pact]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Transfer of Power in India |first=V. P. |last=Menon |edition=Reprinted |publisher=Orient Blackswan |year=1957 |isbn=978-81-250-0884-2 |pages=49–50 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hxdwpfLfEeoC&pg=PA49}}</ref>
In 1942, the Scheduled Castes gained 8.5% reservation in central services and other facilities for the first time.<ref name="g301">{{cite book | last1=Yamamoto | first1=T. | last2=Ueda | first2=T. | title=Law and Democracy in Contemporary India: Constitution, Contact Zone, and Performing Rights | publisher=Springer International Publishing | series=Human Rights Interventions | year=2018 | isbn=978-3-319-95837-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qj18DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA33 | access-date=2024-09-07 | page=33}}</ref>


===After independence===
===After independence===
After the independence of India in 1947 there were some major initiatives in favor of the STs, SCs and after the 1980s in favour of OBCs (Other Backward Castes) and in 2019 for poor in the general category. The country's affirmative action program was launched in 1950 and is the oldest such programme in the world.<ref>{{cite web|title=Human Development Report 2016|url=http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf|website=UNDP|access-date=21 March 2017|page=119}}</ref>
After the independence of India in 1947 there were some major initiatives in favor of the [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes]] (SCs and STs) and after the 1980s in favour of OBCs (Other Backward Castes) and in 2019 for poor in the general category. The country's affirmative action program was launched in 1950 and is the oldest such programme in the world.<ref>{{cite web|title=Human Development Report 2016|url=http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf|website=UNDP|access-date=21 March 2017|page=119}}</ref>


A common form of caste discrimination in India was the practice of untouchability. SCs were the primary targets of the practice, which was outlawed by the new Constitution of India.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Untouchability in the Far East |jstor=2382914 |first=Herbert |last=Passin |journal=Monumenta Nipponica |volume=11 |issue=3 |date=October 1955 |pages=247–267|doi=10.2307/2382914 }}</ref>
A common form of caste discrimination in India was the practice of untouchability. SCs were the primary targets of the practice, which was outlawed by the new Constitution of India.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Untouchability in the Far East |jstor=2382914 |first=Herbert |last=Passin |journal=Monumenta Nipponica |volume=11 |issue=3 |date=October 1955 |pages=247–267|doi=10.2307/2382914 }}</ref>
Line 31: Line 27:
In 1954, the Ministry of Education suggested that 20 percent of places should be reserved for the SCs and STs in educational institutions with a provision to relax minimum qualifying marks for admission by 5 percent wherever required. In 1982, it was specified that 15 percent and 7.5 percent of vacancies in [[public sector]] and government-aided educational institutes should be reserved for the SC and ST candidates, respectively.<ref>{{cite web|title=Educational Safeguards|url=http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/g/S/I6/0SI60301.htm|work=Department of Education|archive-date=19 June 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090619063917/http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/g/S/I6/0SI60301.htm|publisher=Government of India|access-date=2011-11-27}}</ref>
In 1954, the Ministry of Education suggested that 20 percent of places should be reserved for the SCs and STs in educational institutions with a provision to relax minimum qualifying marks for admission by 5 percent wherever required. In 1982, it was specified that 15 percent and 7.5 percent of vacancies in [[public sector]] and government-aided educational institutes should be reserved for the SC and ST candidates, respectively.<ref>{{cite web|title=Educational Safeguards|url=http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/g/S/I6/0SI60301.htm|work=Department of Education|archive-date=19 June 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090619063917/http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/g/S/I6/0SI60301.htm|publisher=Government of India|access-date=2011-11-27}}</ref>


A significant change began in 1979 when the [[Mandal Commission]] or the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Commission was established to assess the situation of the socially and educationally backward classes.<ref name="Bhattacharya">{{Cite news|url=http://www.theotherindia.org/caste/who-are-the-obcs.html|title=Who are the OBCs?|access-date=2006-04-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060627065912/http://www.theotherindia.org/caste/who-are-the-obcs.html |archive-date=27 June 2006 |last=Bhattacharya |first=Amit |work=The Times of India |date=8 April 2006}}</ref> The commission did not have exact population figures for the OBCs and so used data from the [[Census of India prior to independence|1931 census]], thus estimating the group's population at 52 per cent.<ref name=Ramaiah>{{Cite web |last=Ramaiah |first=A. |date=6 June 1992 |url=http://www.tiss.edu/downloads/ppapers/pp1.pdf |title=Identifying Other Backward Classes |pages=1203–1207 |publisher=Economic and Political Weekly |access-date=2006-05-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051230030051/http://www.tiss.edu/downloads/ppapers/pp1.pdf |archive-date=30 December 2005}}</ref> In 1980, the commission's report recommended that a reserved quota for OBCs of 27 per cent should apply in respect of services and public sector bodies operated by the Union Government. It called for a similar change to admissions to institutes of higher education, except where states already had more generous requirements.<ref name="Bhattacharya" /> It was not until the 1990s that the recommendations were implemented in Union Government jobs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Implementation of Recommendations of Mandal Commission |url=http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/lsdeb/ls10/ses4/0507089201.htm |publisher=Parliament of India |access-date=2011-11-04}}</ref> In 2019 the government announces the 10% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs for economically weaker section of the general category.
A significant change began in 1979 when the [[Mandal Commission]] or the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Commission was established to assess the situation of the socially and educationally backward classes.<ref name="Bhattacharya">{{Cite news|url=http://www.theotherindia.org/caste/who-are-the-obcs.html|title=Who are the OBCs?|access-date=2006-04-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060627065912/http://www.theotherindia.org/caste/who-are-the-obcs.html |archive-date=27 June 2006 |last=Bhattacharya |first=Amit |work=The Times of India |date=8 April 2006}}</ref> The commission did not have exact population figures for the OBCs and so used data from the [[Census of India prior to independence|1931 census]], thus estimating the group's population at 52 per cent.<ref name=Ramaiah>{{Cite web |last=Ramaiah |first=A. |date=6 June 1992 |url=http://www.tiss.edu/downloads/ppapers/pp1.pdf |title=Identifying Other Backward Classes |pages=1203–1207 |publisher=Economic and Political Weekly |access-date=2006-05-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051230030051/http://www.tiss.edu/downloads/ppapers/pp1.pdf |archive-date=30 December 2005}}</ref> In 1980, the commission's report recommended that a reserved quota for OBCs of 27 per cent should apply in respect of services and public sector bodies operated by the Union Government. It called for a similar change to admissions to institutes of higher education, except where states already had more generous requirements.<ref name="Bhattacharya" /> It was not until the 1990s that the recommendations were implemented in Union Government jobs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Implementation of Recommendations of Mandal Commission |url=http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/lsdeb/ls10/ses4/0507089201.htm |publisher=Parliament of India |access-date=2011-11-04}}</ref>  In 2006, the Union government extended reservations for Other Backward Classes in institutes of higher education it substantially funded.<ref name="edu">{{cite web |title=How changes in the reservation system in 2006 sowed the seeds for today's campus tumult|date=4 April 2016 |url=https://scroll.in/article/805919/the-seeds-of-todays-ferment-in-central-universities-were-sown-in-2006|publisher=Scroll |access-date=2016-04-10}}</ref> In 2019 the government announces the 10% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs for economically weaker section of the general category.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-01-15 |title=10% EWS quota comes into force |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/10-ews-quota-comes-into-force-5538567/ |access-date=2025-01-26 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref>


The Constitution of India states in article 15(4): "Nothing in [article 15] or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially, and educationally backward classes of citizens of or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes."<ref>{{cite constitution |article=[[:s:Constitution of India/Part III|15]]|section=4 |country=India |language=en |ratified=1950 }}</ref> Article 46 of the Constitution states that "The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation."<ref>{{cite constitution |article=[[:s:Constitution of India/Part IV|46]] |section=0 |country=India |language=en |ratified=1950 |url=http://lawmin.nic.in/olwing/coi/coi-english/Const.Pock%202Pg.Rom8Fsss(7).pdf|access-date=2013-09-08 }}</ref>
The Constitution of India states in article 15(4): "Nothing in [article 15] or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially, and educationally backward classes of citizens of or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes."<ref>{{cite constitution |article=[[:s:Constitution of India/Part III|15]]|section=4 |country=India |language=en |ratified=1950 }}</ref> Article 46 of the Constitution states that "The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation."<ref>{{cite constitution |article=46 |section=0 |country=India |language=en |ratified=1950 |url=http://lawmin.nic.in/olwing/coi/coi-english/Const.Pock%202Pg.Rom8Fsss(7).pdf|access-date=2013-09-08 }}</ref>


The [[Supreme Court of India]] ruled in 1992 that reservations could not exceed 50 percent, anything above which it judged would violate equal access as guaranteed by the Constitution. It thus put a cap on reservations.<ref name="sawhney" /> However, the recent amendment of the constitution exceeds 50% and also there are state laws that exceed this 50 percent limit and these are under litigation in the Supreme Court. For example, in the State of [[Tamil Nadu]], the caste-based reservation stands at 69 percent and applies to about 87 percent of the population.
The [[Supreme Court of India]] ruled in 1992 that reservations could not exceed 50 percent, anything above which it judged would violate equal access as guaranteed by the Constitution. It thus put a cap on reservations.<ref name="sawhney" /> However, the recent amendment of the constitution exceeds 50% and also there are state laws that exceed this 50 percent limit and these are under litigation in the Supreme Court. For example, in the State of [[Tamil Nadu]], the caste-based reservation stands at 69 percent and applies to about 89 percent of the population.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dharmadhikari |first=Sanyukta |date=2021-03-29 |title=How Tamil Nadu's reservation stands at 69% despite the 50% quota cap |url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/tamil-nadu/how-tamil-nadu-s-reservation-stands-69-despite-50-quota-cap-146116 |access-date=2025-01-26 |website=The News Minute |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=S |first=Mohamed Imranullah |date=2024-04-03 |title=89% of Tamil Nadu's population already eligible for reservation, State tells Madras High Court |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/89-of-tamil-nadus-population-already-eligible-for-reservation-state-govt-tells-madras-high-court/article68024416.ece |access-date=2025-01-26 |work=The Hindu |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
 
On 7 November 2022, [[Supreme Court of India]] by a 3:2 verdict in Janhit Abhiyan vs Union Of India  Writ Petition (Civil) No(S). 55 OF 2019, upheld the validity of the 103rd constitutional amendment carried out to provide legal sanction carve out 10% reservation for the economically weaker sections from [[Forward caste|unreserved classes]] for admission in educational institutions and government jobs<ref>{{cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/quotas-poor-forward-castes-supreme-court-rule-8254179/|title=Quotas for poor among 'forward castes' upheld: Here's the case and what the SC has ruled|date=7 November 2022 }}</ref> and held that the 50% cap on quota is not inviolable and affirmative action on economic basis may go a long way in eradicating caste-based reservation.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-upholds-ews-quota-in-3-2-split-verdict-cji-in-minority/articleshow/95365168.cms|title=Supreme Court upholds EWS quota in 3-2 split verdict, CJI in minority|website=[[The Times of India]] |date=8 November 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/reservation-policy-cannot-stay-for-indefinite-period-says-supreme-court/article66108033.ece?homepage=true|title=Reservation policy cannot stay for indefinite period, says Supreme Court|website=[[The Hindu]] |date=7 November 2022 }}</ref> This constitutional amendment pushed the total reservation to 59.50% in central institutions.
 
On 1 August 2024, the Supreme Court of India ruled 6:1 in favor of permitting states to create sub-quotas for Scheduled Castes and Tribes within their reservation schemes.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Validity of Sub-Classification Within Reserved Categories |url=https://www.scobserver.in/cases/punjab-davinder-singh-validity-of-sub-classification-within-reserved-categories-case-background/ |access-date=2024-09-25 |website=Supreme Court Observer |language=en-US}}</ref> Chief Justice [[Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud|D.Y. Chandrachud]] stated that Article 14 of the [[Constitution of India]] should be interpreted to mean "that the same law should apply to those who are similarly situated.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sub-Classification Within Reserved Categories {{!}} Judgement Summary |url=https://www.scobserver.in/reports/sub-classification-within-reserved-categories-judgement-summary/ |access-date=2024-09-25 |website=Supreme Court Observer |language=en-US}}</ref>" Justice [[Bela Trivedi]] provided the lone dissent, saying that states did not have the power to "tinker" with the 1950 Presidential List and that the sub-quotas violated Article 14.  Justice [[Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai|B.R. Gavai]] concurred with Chief Justice Chandrachud, but added that the 'creamy layer' concept that applied to OBCs should apply to SC/ST groups as well.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sub-Classification Within Reserved Categories {{!}} Judgement Matrix |url=https://www.scobserver.in/reports/sub-classification-within-reserved-categories-judgement-matrix/ |access-date=2024-09-25 |website=Supreme Court Observer |language=en-US}}</ref>


==Reservation schemes==
==Reservation schemes==
{{More citations needed section|date=December 2020}}
 
{{Multiple issues|section=yes|{{More citations needed section|date=December 2020}}
{{Cleanup MOS|section=section|date=April 2025|reason=grammar and capitalization at the beginning}}}}
[[File:Caste reservations in India.png|thumb|Caste reservations in universities and jobs of the [[Central govt of india|Central Govt.]]]]


===In employment===
===In employment===
Government and public sector will hire job seekers based on reservation percentage from two different categories 1: reservation category (SC, ST, OBC, EWC and other minorities) 2:Open category (General, SC, ST, OBC, EWC and other minorities).
Government and public sector will hire job seekers based on reservation percentage from two different categories :
While hiring, major priority is given to reservation category including 33% reservation for Women, priority in hiring is given by Other Minorities women, ST women, SC women, ST Men, SC Men, OBC women, OBC Men, EWC Women, EWC Men and then after Open category Will be considered.  
 
Government and public sector hiring based on Merit in open category and one more anomaly here i.e., Priority in hiring will be given by: Other Minorities women, ST women, SC women, ST Men, SC Men, OBC women, OBC Men, EWC Women, EWC Men and then General if they are equally eligibility (for example having same marks or Rank).
# Reservation category (SC, ST, OBC, EWS and other minorities)
The landmark initiative of Special Recruitment for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe in Government jobs was started in Kerala in 1972 by Vella Eacharan.  
# Open category (General, SC, ST, OBC, EWS and other minorities).
The 1993 Supreme Court ruling in the [[Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India]] case said that reservations in job promotions are "unconstitutional" or not in accordance with the political constitution but allowed its continuation for five years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/bjps-obc-pitch-how-stronger-new-backward-classes-panel-will-function-4617203/|title=BJP's OBC pitch: How stronger new backward classes panel will function|date=18 April 2017|publisher=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref name="sawhney">{{cite web |url=http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1363234/ |title=Indra Sawhney Etc. vs Union of India And Others, Etc. on 16 November, 1992 |publisher=IndianKanoon.org |quote="(4) Reservation being an extreme form of protective measure or affirmative action it should be confined to minority of seats. Even though the Constitution does not lay down any specific bar but the constitutional philosophy being against proportional equality the principle of balancing equality ordains reservation, of any manner, not to exceed 50%.", "Reservation in promotion is constitutionally impermissible as once the advantaged and disadvantaged are made equal and are brought in one class or group then any further benefit extended for promotion on the inequality existing prior to being brought in the group would be treating equals unequally. It would not be eradicating the effects of past discrimination but perpetuating it." |access-date=2012-08-22}}</ref> In 1995, the [[List of amendments of the Constitution of India|77th amendment]] to the Constitution was made to amend [[s:Constitution of India/Part III#Article 16 .7BEquality of opportunity in matters of public employment. 7D|Article 16]] before the five-year period expired to continue with reservations for SC/STs in promotions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend77.htm |title=Seventy Seventh Amendment |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref> It was further modified through the 85th amendment to give the benefit of ''consequential seniority'' to SC/ST candidates promoted by reservation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend85.htm |title=Eighty Fifth Amendment |date=4 January 2002 |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref>
 
While hiring, major priority is given to reservation category including 33% reservation for Women, priority in hiring is given by :
 
* Other minorities Women
* ST Women
* SC Women
* ST Men
* SC Men
* OBC Women
* OBC Men  
* EWS Women  
* EWS Men
 
and then after Open category will be considered.
 
Government and public sector hiring based on merit in open category and one more anomaly here i.e., priority in hiring is the same as for the reserved category.
 
The landmark initiative of Special Recruitment for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe in Government jobs was started in Kerala in 1972 by Vella Eacharan. The 1993 Supreme Court ruling in the [[Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India]] case said that reservations in job promotions are "unconstitutional" or not in accordance with the political constitution but allowed its continuation for five years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/bjps-obc-pitch-how-stronger-new-backward-classes-panel-will-function-4617203/|title=BJP's OBC pitch: How stronger new backward classes panel will function|date=18 April 2017|publisher=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref name="sawhney">{{cite web |url=http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1363234/ |title=Indra Sawhney Etc. vs Union of India And Others, Etc. on 16 November, 1992 |publisher=IndianKanoon.org |quote="(4) Reservation being an extreme form of protective measure or affirmative action it should be confined to minority of seats. Even though the Constitution does not lay down any specific bar but the constitutional philosophy being against proportional equality the principle of balancing equality ordains reservation, of any manner, not to exceed 50%.", "Reservation in promotion is constitutionally impermissible as once the advantaged and disadvantaged are made equal and are brought in one class or group then any further benefit extended for promotion on the inequality existing prior to being brought in the group would be treating equals unequally. It would not be eradicating the effects of past discrimination but perpetuating it." |access-date=2012-08-22}}</ref>
 
In 1995, the [[List of amendments of the Constitution of India|77th amendment]] to the Constitution was made to amend [[s:Constitution of India/Part III#Article 16 .7BEquality of opportunity in matters of public employment. 7D|Article 16]] before the five-year period expired to continue with reservations for SC/STs in promotions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend77.htm |title=Seventy Seventh Amendment |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref> It was further modified through the 85th amendment to give the benefit of ''consequential seniority'' to SC/ST candidates promoted by reservation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend85.htm |title=Eighty Fifth Amendment |date=4 January 2002 |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref>


The 81st amendment was made to the Constitution to permit the government to treat the backlog of reserved vacancies as a separate and distinct group, to which the ceiling of 50 per cent did not apply.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend81.htm |title=Eighty First Amendment |date=29 August 1997 |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref> The 82nd amendment inserted a provision in Article 335 to enable states to give concessions to SC/ST candidates in promotion.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend82.htm |title=Eighty Second Amendment |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref>
The 81st amendment was made to the Constitution to permit the government to treat the backlog of reserved vacancies as a separate and distinct group, to which the ceiling of 50 per cent did not apply.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend81.htm |title=Eighty First Amendment |date=29 August 1997 |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref> The 82nd amendment inserted a provision in Article 335 to enable states to give concessions to SC/ST candidates in promotion.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend82.htm |title=Eighty Second Amendment |publisher=Indiacode.nic.in |access-date=2011-11-19}}</ref>
Line 51: Line 73:
The validity of all the above four amendments was challenged in the Supreme Court through various petitions clubbed together in ''M. Nagaraj & Others Vs. Union of India & Others'', mainly on the ground that these altered the [[basic structure doctrine|Basic Structure of the Constitution]]. In 2006, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments but stipulated that the concerned state will have to show, in each case, the existence of "compelling reasons" - which include "backwardness", "inadequacy of representation" and overall "administrative efficiency - before making provisions for reservation. The court further held that these provisions are merely [[enabling act|enabling provisions]]. If a state government wishes to make provisions for reservation to SC/STs in the promotion, the state has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class.<ref name="M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union Of India & Others on 19 October 2006">{{cite web |url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/102852/ |title=M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union of India & Others on 19 October 2006 |quote="We reiterate that the ceiling-limit of 50%, the concept of creamy layer and the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiency are all constitutional requirements without which the structure of equality of opportunity in Article 16 would collapse.", "As stated above, the impugned provision is an enabling provision. The State is not bound to make reservation for SC/ST in matter of promotions." |access-date=2012-08-22 |first=S. H.|last=Kapadia}}</ref>
The validity of all the above four amendments was challenged in the Supreme Court through various petitions clubbed together in ''M. Nagaraj & Others Vs. Union of India & Others'', mainly on the ground that these altered the [[basic structure doctrine|Basic Structure of the Constitution]]. In 2006, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments but stipulated that the concerned state will have to show, in each case, the existence of "compelling reasons" - which include "backwardness", "inadequacy of representation" and overall "administrative efficiency - before making provisions for reservation. The court further held that these provisions are merely [[enabling act|enabling provisions]]. If a state government wishes to make provisions for reservation to SC/STs in the promotion, the state has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class.<ref name="M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union Of India & Others on 19 October 2006">{{cite web |url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/102852/ |title=M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union of India & Others on 19 October 2006 |quote="We reiterate that the ceiling-limit of 50%, the concept of creamy layer and the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiency are all constitutional requirements without which the structure of equality of opportunity in Article 16 would collapse.", "As stated above, the impugned provision is an enabling provision. The State is not bound to make reservation for SC/ST in matter of promotions." |access-date=2012-08-22 |first=S. H.|last=Kapadia}}</ref>


In 2007, the [[Government of Uttar Pradesh]] introduced reservation in job promotions. However, citing the Supreme Court decision, the policy was ruled to be unconstitutional by the [[Allahabad High Court]] in 2011.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-01-05/lucknow/28363783_1_consequential-seniority-promotion-quota-reservation |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130126084309/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-01-05/lucknow/28363783_1_consequential-seniority-promotion-quota-reservation |url-status=dead |archive-date=26 January 2013 |title=Promotion quota not legally sustainable: HC |date=5 January 2011 |work=[[The Times of India]] |access-date=2012-08-10}}</ref> The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court, which upheld it in 2012 by rejecting the government's argument because it failed to furnish sufficient valid data to justify the move to promote employees on a caste basis.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-04-28/lucknow/31451487_1_consequential-seniority-due-promotions-reservation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510200921/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-04-28/lucknow/31451487_1_consequential-seniority-due-promotions-reservation |url-status=dead |archive-date=10 May 2013 |title=Supreme Court upholds High court's decision to quash quota in promotion |date=28 April 2012 |work=[[The Times of India]] |access-date=2012-08-10}}</ref>
In 2007, the [[Government of Uttar Pradesh]] introduced reservation in job promotions. However, citing the Supreme Court decision, the policy was ruled to be unconstitutional by the [[Allahabad High Court]] in 2011.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/Promotion-quota-not-legally-sustainable-HC/articleshow/7220180.cms |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130126084309/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-01-05/lucknow/28363783_1_consequential-seniority-promotion-quota-reservation |archive-date=26 January 2013 |title=Promotion quota not legally sustainable: HC |date=5 January 2011 |work=[[The Times of India]] |url-status=live |access-date=2012-08-10}}</ref> The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court, which upheld it in 2012 by rejecting the government's argument because it failed to furnish sufficient valid data to justify the move to promote employees on a caste basis.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/Supreme-Court-upholds-High-courts-decision-to-quash-quota-in-promotion/articleshow/12903017.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510200921/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-04-28/lucknow/31451487_1_consequential-seniority-due-promotions-reservation |archive-date=10 May 2013 |title=Supreme Court upholds High court's decision to quash quota in promotion |date=28 April 2012 |work=[[The Times of India]] |url-status=live |access-date=2012-08-10}}</ref>


===In education===
===In education===
Universities allot seats based on reservation percentage from two different categories are 1: reservation category (SC, ST, OBC, EWC and other minorities) 2:Open category (General, SC, ST, OBC, EWS and other minorities).
Universities allot seats based on reservation percentage from the same two categories, that is :
In allotment, Major priority given to reservation category including 33% reservation for Women, priority in allotting is given by Other Minorities women, ST women, SC women, ST Men, SC Men, OBC women, OBC Men, EWC Women, EWC Men and then after Open category Will be considered.
 
Government Universities will allot based on priority by: Other Minorities women, ST women, SC women, ST Men, SC Men, OBC women, OBC Men, EWC Women, EWC Men & then General and reservation percentage under consideration for entrance exams fees, for cut off marks, for allotment of seats and also applicable to other government schemes.
# Reservation category
# Open category
 
Government Universities will allot based on the same priority as previously mentioned, along with, reservation percentage under consideration for entrance exams fees, for cut off marks, for allotment of seats and also applicable to other government schemes.


In India student aids are available for—SCs, STs, BCs, OBCs, women, Muslims, and other minorities. Only about 0.7% of student aids in India is based on merit, given the grossly inadequate representation of above-mentioned categories in employment and education due to historic, societal and cultural reasons.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rediff.com/news/report/rediff-labs-can-you-guess-how-many-indians-get-merit-based-scholarships/20140901.htm|title=Guess how many Indians get merit-based scholarship
In India student aids are available for—SCs, STs, BCs, OBCs, women, Muslims, and other minorities. Only about 0.7% of student aids in India is based on merit.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rediff.com/news/report/rediff-labs-can-you-guess-how-many-indians-get-merit-based-scholarships/20140901.htm|title=Guess how many Indians get merit-based scholarship
|date=1 September 2014|work=Rediff|access-date=2016-05-08}}</ref>
|date=1 September 2014|work=Rediff|access-date=2016-05-08}}</ref>


=== States ===
=== States ===
In central-government funded higher education institutions, 22.5% of available seats are reserved for Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) students (7.5% for STs, 15% for SCs,20% for ESC,12% for SCA,16% for SCB,22% for SCC,18% for SCD).<ref name="AAPE">{{cite web|title=Affirmative Action and Peer Effects: Evidence from Caste Based Reservation in General Education Colleges in India|url=http://people.virginia.edu/~ss5mj/Peereffects_April12_2011.pdf|publisher=Virginia University, Virginia|access-date=2011-11-05}}</ref> This reservation percentage has been raised to 49.5%<ref name="AAPE" /> by including an additional 27% reservation for OBCs. This ratio is followed even in Parliament and all elections where a few constituencies are earmarked for those from certain communities (which will next rotate in 2026 per the [[Delimitation Commission of India|Delimitation Commission]]). Some states and UTs have reservations for females which varies from 5% to 33.33%.
In central-government funded higher education institutions, 22.5% of available seats are reserved for Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) students (7.5% for STs, 15% for SCs).<ref name="AAPE">{{cite web|title=Affirmative Action and Peer Effects: Evidence from Caste Based Reservation in General Education Colleges in India|url=http://people.virginia.edu/~ss5mj/Peereffects_April12_2011.pdf|publisher=Virginia University, Virginia|access-date=2011-11-05}}</ref> This reservation percentage has been raised to 49.5%<ref name="AAPE" /> by including an additional 27% reservation for OBCs. This ratio is followed even in Parliament and all elections where a few constituencies are earmarked for those from certain communities (which will next rotate in 2026 per the [[Delimitation Commission of India|Delimitation Commission]]). Some states and UTs have reservations for females which varies from 5% to 33.33%.
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Percentages of reservation for each state
|+Percentages of reservation for each state<ref>{{cite report |title=Reservation guidelines |url=https://www.istm.gov.in/uploads/tenders/1608195566RIS.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240812173659/https://www.istm.gov.in/uploads/tenders/1608195566RIS.pdf |archive-date=12 August 2024 |url-status=live |access-date=12 August 2024 }}</ref>
!State/UT
!State/UT
!SC
![[Scheduled Castes|SC]]
!ST
![[Scheduled Tribes|ST]]
!OBC  
![[Other Backward Class|OBC]]
!EWS
![[Economically Weaker Section|EWS]]
!Other Reservations
!Other Reservations
!Total
!Total
Line 99: Line 124:
![[Assam]]
![[Assam]]
|7
|7
|15
|12
|27
|27
|10
|10
|
|
|59
|56
|-
|-
![[Bihar]]
![[Bihar]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-06-20 |title=Patna high court strikes down Bihar govt's 65% reservation in jobs, education |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/patna-high-court-strikes-down-bihar-govts-65-reservation-in-jobs-education/articleshow/111131372.cms |access-date=2024-07-17 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}}</ref>
|15
|16
|1
|1
|34
|33
|10
|10
|
|
Line 143: Line 168:
|10
|10
|
|
|60
|59
|-
|-
![[Goa]]
![[Goa]]
Line 159: Line 184:
|10
|10
|
|
|59
|58
|-
|-
![[Haryana]]
![[Haryana]]
Line 186: Line 211:
|-
|-
![[Karnataka]]
![[Karnataka]]
|15
|17
|3
|7
|32
|32
|10
|10
|
|
|60
|66
|-
|-
![[Kerala]]
![[Kerala]]
Line 217: Line 242:
|60
|60
|-
|-
![[Maharashtra]]
![[Maharashtra]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-04-22 |title=No error in junking Maratha quota, won't review it: Supreme Court |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/no-error-in-junking-maratha-quota-wont-review-it-supreme-court/articleshow/99676859.cms |access-date=2024-07-17 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-05-06 |title=Supreme Court throws out Maratha quota law, cites 50% reservation cap |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-quashes-maharashtra-law-granting-reservation-to-maratha-community-7302656/ |access-date=2024-07-17 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref>
|13
|13
|7
|7
|32
|32
|10
|10
|
|1(Orphan)
|62
|63
|-
|-
![[Manipur]]
![[Manipur]]
Line 286: Line 311:
|21
|21
|10
|10
|
|5 for MBC
|59
|64
|-
|-
![[Sikkim]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Department Of Personnel {{!}} State Portal-Sikkim |url=https://sikkim.gov.in/departments/department-of-personnel-public-grievances |access-date=2022-04-16 |website=sikkim.gov.in}}</ref>
![[Sikkim]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Department Of Personnel {{!}} State Portal-Sikkim |url=https://sikkim.gov.in/departments/department-of-personnel-public-grievances |access-date=2022-04-16 |website=sikkim.gov.in}}</ref>
Line 305: Line 330:
|69
|69
|-
|-
![[Telangana]]<ref>https://www.tspsc.gov.in/FAQ.jsp</</ref>
![[Telangana]]<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.tspsc.gov.in/FAQ.jsp%3C/ | title=Telangana State Public Service Commission }}{{Dead link|date=December 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
|15
|15
|6
|10
|29
|29
|10
|10
|
|
|60
|64
|-
|-
![[Tripura]]
![[Tripura]]
Line 329: Line 354:
|60
|60
|-
|-
![[Uttarakhand]]
![[Uttarakhand]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Determination of Post Based Roster Policy|url=https://psc.uk.gov.in/public/uploads/importantrecruitment/981719045.pdf|language=hi|website=[[Uttarakhand Public Service Commission]]|date=22 May 2020|access-date=7 November 2022|archive-date=29 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230129135628/https://psc.uk.gov.in/public/uploads/importantrecruitment/981719045.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>
|18
|19
|3
|4
|13
|14
|10
|10
|
|
|44
|47
|-
|-
![[West Bengal]]
![[West Bengal]]
Line 347: Line 372:
The exact percentages vary from state to state:
The exact percentages vary from state to state:


* In [[Tamil Nadu]], OBC reservation is divided into 26.5% Backward Caste, 3.5 Backward Caste (M) and 20% Most Backward Caste and 10.5% sub quota for vanniyars, introduced by AIADMK in 2020,7% for DNT . The 7.5% for Vanniyars was quashed void by Madras High Court. The SC quota has 3% sub-quota for [[Arunthathiyar|Arunthatiyars]], introduced by DMK in 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=108754|title=Status of Reservation of OBC in Various States|website=pib.nic.in|access-date=24 February 2019}}</ref>
* In [[Tamil Nadu]], OBC reservation is divided into 26.5% Backward Caste, 3.5 Backward Caste (M) and 20% Most Backward Caste and 10.5% sub quota for Vanniyars, introduced by AIADMK in 2020,7% for DNT. The 7.5% for Vanniyars was quashed void by Madras High Court. The SC quota has 3% sub-quota for [[Arunthathiyar|Arunthatiyars]], introduced by DMK in 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=108754|title=Status of Reservation of OBC in Various States|website=pib.nic.in|access-date=24 February 2019}}</ref>
* In [[Maharashtra]] in addition to the reservation for SC/ST/OBC, there is 2% for SBCs, 3% for Nomadic Tribes – NT-A ([[Denotified Tribes|Vimukta jati]]), 2.5% for NT-B, 3.5% for NT-C ([[Dhangar]]), and 2% for NT-D ([[Vanjari (caste)|Vanjari]]).
* In [[Maharashtra]] in addition to the reservation for SC/ST/OBC, there is 2% for SBCs, 3% for Nomadic Tribes – NT-A ([[Denotified Tribes|Vimukta jati]]), 2.5% for NT-B, 3.5% for NT-C ([[Dhangar]]), 2% for NT-D ([[Vanjari caste|Vanjari]]), 10% for SEBC ([[Maratha]]) and 1% for [[Orphan]].
* In Northeast India, e.g. in Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Mizoram, reservation for ST in State Govt. jobs is 80% with only 20% unreserved. In the Central Universities of [[North-Eastern Hill University|NEHU]] (Shillong) and [[Rajiv Gandhi University]], 60% of seats are reserved for ST students.
* In Northeast India, e.g. in Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Mizoram, reservation for ST in State Govt. jobs is 80% with only 20% unreserved. In the Central Universities of [[North-Eastern Hill University|NEHU]] (Shillong) and [[Rajiv Gandhi University]], 60% of seats are reserved for ST students.
* In [[West Bengal]], the OBC community is divided into OBC A & B.<ref name="anagrasarkalyan.gov.in">{{cite web|url=http://www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in|title=Backward Classes Welfare Department, Government of West Bengal|access-date=2015-02-02}}</ref> In West Bengal there is no reservation on religious basis but some economically and educationally backward Muslim castes (basis surnames pertaining to different profession e.g. cobbler, weaver etc.) have been included along with their Hindu counterparts in the OBC list namely OBC A and OBC B, in both lists caste from both communities are there. But in higher educational institutes, till now there is no reservation for the OBC community but there is reservation in regard to admission in primary, secondary and higher secondary studies.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web|url=http://www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in/htm/reserv-1.html|title=BCW Department-Govt of West Bengal, Reservation|access-date=2015-02-02}}</ref><ref name="anagrasarkalyan.gov.in" />
* In [[West Bengal]], the OBC community is divided into OBC A & B.<ref name="anagrasarkalyan.gov.in">{{cite web|url=http://www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in|title=Backward Classes Welfare Department, Government of West Bengal|access-date=2015-02-02}}</ref> In West Bengal there is no reservation on religious basis but some economically and educationally backward Muslim castes (basis surnames pertaining to different profession e.g. cobbler, weaver etc.) have been included along with their Hindu counterparts in the OBC list namely OBC A and OBC B, in both lists caste from both communities are there. But in higher educational institutes, till now there is no reservation for the OBC community but there is reservation in regard to admission in primary, secondary and higher secondary studies.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web|url=http://www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in/htm/reserv-1.html|title=BCW Department-Govt of West Bengal, Reservation|access-date=2015-02-02|archive-date=28 December 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141228185942/http://www.anagrasarkalyan.gov.in/htm/reserv-1.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="anagrasarkalyan.gov.in" />


==Gender==
==Gender==
=== Cisgender women ===
The [[Women's Reservation Bill]] was passed by the [[Rajya Sabha]] on 9 March 2010 by a majority vote of 186 members in favor and 1 against. As of March 2013, the [[Lok Sabha]] has not voted on the bill. Critics say gender cannot be held as a basis for reservation alone other factors should also be considered e.g. economic, social conditions of woman candidates especially when applying reservation for educated women. The criticism points that the policy benefits women that have access to political capital through family circles and are faced with the burden of a huge learning curve. Again, women are  divided  among  caste  and  class  lines  with  this  dichotomy  playing  an  important  role  in deciding  how  the  presence  of  women  in  the  lowest  tier  of  governance  impact  the  problems faced by the women of the constituency<ref>{{Cite journal|last=M S|first=Navaneeth|title=Reservations for Women in Kerala's Local Self-government Institutions: A Mere Tokenism?|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344275338|journal=International Journal of Law Management and Humanities|volume=3|pages=4}}</ref>
The [[Women's Reservation Bill]] was passed by the [[Rajya Sabha]] on 9 March 2010 by a majority vote of 186 members in favor and 1 against. As of March 2013, the [[Lok Sabha]] has not voted on the bill. Critics say gender cannot be held as a basis for reservation alone other factors should also be considered e.g. economic, social conditions of woman candidates especially when applying reservation for educated women. The criticism points that the policy benefits women that have access to political capital through family circles and are faced with the burden of a huge learning curve. Again, women are  divided  among  caste  and  class  lines  with  this  dichotomy  playing  an  important  role  in deciding  how  the  presence  of  women  in  the  lowest  tier  of  governance  impact  the  problems faced by the women of the constituency<ref>{{Cite journal|last=M S|first=Navaneeth|title=Reservations for Women in Kerala's Local Self-government Institutions: A Mere Tokenism?|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344275338|journal=International Journal of Law Management and Humanities|volume=3|pages=4}}</ref>


In Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, 32% of posts are reserved for females in all government departments and services, such as police, health, education and general administration.<ref name="Deccan Herald 2014">{{cite web | title=33% reservation for women in all Gujarat state government jobs | website=Deccan Herald | date=13 October 2014 | url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/435789/33-reservation-women-all-gujarat.html | access-date=2015-09-03}}</ref><ref name="dnax2014">{{cite web | title=Gujarat increases women's reservation to 33% in government jobs | website=dna | date=14 October 2014 | url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-gujarat-increases-women-s-reservation-to-33-in-government-jobs-2025919 | access-date=2015-09-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Arora|first=N.D.|title=Political Science for Civil Services Main Examination|year=2010|publisher=Tata McGraw-Hill Education|page=19|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z8Flb0gZ3ZkC&pg=SA5-PA19|isbn=9780070090941}}</ref> From 2015 onwards Kerala has implemented a 55% reservation for all posts of its local self governing bodies.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Local body polls: Women fight on two fronts as parties reluctant to give out general seats|url=https://www.onmanorama.com/kerala/top-news/2020/11/22/kerala-local-body-polls-parties-refuse-to-field-women-in-general-seats.html|access-date=2020-12-30|website=OnManorama}}</ref>
In Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, 32% of posts are reserved for females in all government departments and services, such as police, health, education and general administration.<ref name="Deccan Herald 2014">{{cite web | title=33% reservation for women in all Gujarat state government jobs | website=Deccan Herald | date=13 October 2014 | url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/435789/33-reservation-women-all-gujarat.html | access-date=2015-09-03}}</ref><ref name="dnax2014">{{cite web | title=Gujarat increases women's reservation to 33% in government jobs | website=dna | date=14 October 2014 | url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-gujarat-increases-women-s-reservation-to-33-in-government-jobs-2025919 | access-date=2015-09-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Arora|first=N.D.|title=Political Science for Civil Services Main Examination|year=2010|publisher=Tata McGraw-Hill Education|page=19|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z8Flb0gZ3ZkC&pg=SA5-PA19|isbn=978-0-07-009094-1}}</ref> From 2015 onwards Kerala has implemented a 55% reservation for all posts of its local self governing bodies.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Local body polls: Women fight on two fronts as parties reluctant to give out general seats|url=https://www.onmanorama.com/kerala/top-news/2020/11/22/kerala-local-body-polls-parties-refuse-to-field-women-in-general-seats.html|access-date=2020-12-30|website=OnManorama}}</ref>
 
On 28 September 2023, the [[One Hundred and Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India]] was given ascension after having been introduced during the Special Session of the Parliament of India. The amendment seeks to allocate 33 percent of the seats in the Lok Sabha and elected state legislative assemblies for women.
 
=== Transgender and non-binary people ===
In 2017, a drafting committee in Karnataka crafted a policy to create a 1% reservation for [[Hijra (South Asia)|transgender people]] in education and employment.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-10-27 |title=Transgender policy cleared by Karnataka cabinet |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/transgender-policy-cleared-by-karnataka-cabinet-4909196/ |access-date=2024-02-04 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref> On 21 July 2021, Karnataka implemented the policy, making the state the first in the country to provide one percent reservation for the transgender community in all government services. The government submitted a report to the High Court in this regard, informing that a notification had already been issued after amending the Karnataka Civil Service. The job could be given to males or females, from the same category, in case of the non-availability of transgender candidates.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Karnataka Is The First State To Provide 1% Reservation To Transgenders In Govt Services|url=https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/karnataka-reservation-to-transgenders-in-govt-services-545457.html|access-date=2021-07-21|website=India Times|date=21 July 2021}}</ref>
 
On April 6, 2015, the [[Tamil Nadu]] government's [[Department of Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare (Tamil Nadu)|BCC Department]] issued a government order classifying transgender persons under [[Other Backward Class]] status as a caste identity if lacking a community certificate.<ref>{{Cite news |last=B.A |first=Pon Vasanth |date=2017-05-16 |title=Withholding of my appointment orders unfair: transwoman |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/transwoman/article18468533.ece |access-date=2024-06-07 |work=The Hindu |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web | title=Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare (BCC) Department | url=https://www.mrb.tn.gov.in/GOs/bcmbc_e_28_2015.pdf | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160806054501/http://www.mrb.tn.gov.in/GOs/bcmbc_e_28_2015.pdf | archive-date=6 August 2016 | access-date=7 June 2024 | url-status=live }}</ref> In June 2024, the [[Madras High Court]] struck down the order and directed the Tamil Nadu government to provide 1% horizontal reservations to the transgender community in education and employment, ruling that the GO violated Articles 14, 15, 16, 19 and 21 of the [[Constitution of India]], as well as the [[National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India]] verdict.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sigamany |first=Azeefa Fathima, Vidya |date=2024-06-02 |title=Madras HC directs TN government to implement horizontal reservation for trans persons |url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/tamil-nadu/madras-hc-directs-tn-government-to-implement-horizontal-reservation-for-trans-persons |access-date=2024-06-06 |website=The News Minute |language=en}}</ref>


On 21 July 2021, Karnataka became the first state in the country to provide one percent reservation for the transgender community in all government services. The government submitted a report to the High Court in this regard, informing that a notification had already been issued after amending the Karnataka Civil Service. The job could be given to males or females, from the same category, in case of the non-availability of transgender candidates.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Karnataka Is The First State To Provide 1% Reservation To Transgenders In Govt Services|url=https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/karnataka-reservation-to-transgenders-in-govt-services-545457.html|access-date=2021-07-21|website=India Times|date=21 July 2021}}</ref>
In June 2024, the [[Calcutta High Court]] ordered the government of [[West Bengal]] to establish a 1% quota in public employment.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-06-17 |title=Calcutta HC orders 1% transgender quota in govt employments in West Bengal |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/calcutta-high-court-directs-west-bengal-government-to-ensure-1-transgender-job-quota/articleshow/111046352.cms |access-date=2024-06-19 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}}</ref>


==Religion==
==Religion==
The [[Tamil Nadu]] government has allotted 3.5% of seats each to Muslims and Christians, thereby altering the OBC reservation to 23% from 30% (since it excludes persons belonging to Other Backward Castes who are either Muslims or Christians).<ref name=Viswanathan>{{Cite news|last=Viswanathan |first=S. |title=A step forward |newspaper=Frontline |volume=24 |issue=22 |date=16 November 2007 |url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl2422/stories/20071116502203400.htm |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101120195956/http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl2422/stories/20071116502203400.htm |archive-date=20 November 2010 }}</ref>
While courts have ruled that reservations on the basis of religion are unconstitutional, several state governments have allotted reservations to religious minorities or backward classes among religious minorities on the basis of socio-educational backwardness and representation.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Faizee |first=Shameem |date=2010-02-23 |title=Reservation on basis of religion |work=The Economic Times |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/reservation-on-basis-of-religion/articleshow/5605613.cms?_oref=cook&from=mdr |access-date=2023-03-26 |issn=0013-0389}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-05-07 |title=Expert Explains: A brief history of religion-based reservations in India; the question of Muslims' inclusion |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/expert-explains-the-muslim-quota-question-9312311/ |access-date=2024-10-17 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref>
 
The [[Tamil Nadu]] government has allotted 3.5% of seats each to Muslims and Christians, thereby altering the OBC reservation to 23% from 30% (since it excludes persons belonging to Other Backward Castes who are either Muslims or Christians).<ref name="Viswanathan">{{Cite news|last=Viswanathan |first=S. |title=A step forward |newspaper=Frontline |volume=24 |issue=22 |date=16 November 2007 |url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl2422/stories/20071116502203400.htm |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101120195956/http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl2422/stories/20071116502203400.htm |archive-date=20 November 2010 }}</ref>


The Government of Andhra Pradesh introduced a law enabling 4 percent reservations for Muslims in 2004. This law was upheld by the Supreme Court in an interim order in 2010 but it constituted a Constitution bench to look further into the issue.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/interim-relief-to-ap-on-muslim-reservation/article304480.ece|title=Interim relief to AP on Muslim reservation|work=The Hindu|date=25 March 2010|access-date=2015-06-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-24/india/32827015_1_muslim-sub-quota-central-educational-institutions-constitution-bench|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130629123830/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-24/india/32827015_1_muslim-sub-quota-central-educational-institutions-constitution-bench|url-status=dead|archive-date=2013-06-29|work=[[The Times of India]]|title=Supreme Court to hear govt on Muslim quota|access-date=2015-06-14}}</ref> The referral was to examine the constitutional validity of quotas based on religion.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/centre-seeks-scs-approval-on-muslim-reservation/articleshow/30704696.cms?from=mdr|title=Centre Seeks SCs approval on Muslim Reservation|work=timesofindia-economictimes|access-date=2020-03-05}}</ref> [[Kerala Public Service Commission]] has a quota of 12% for Muslims.<ref>{{Cite web|date=7 September 2020|title=Reservation chart by Kerala Public Service Commission|url=https://www.keralapsc.gov.in/index.php/rotation-chart}}</ref> Religious minority (Muslim or Christian) educational institutes also have 50% reservation for Muslim or Christian religions. The Central government has listed a number of Muslim communities as [[List of Muslim Other Backward Classes communities|backward Muslims]], making them eligible for reservation.{{citation needed|date=September 2016}}<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/west-bengal-announces-reservation-for-muslims-in-govt-jobs/articleshow/5548683.cms?from=mdr|title=State Government Provides Reservation to Muslims|last=A|first=Roshan|date=2 February 2010|website=Economic Times|access-date=6 February 2010}}</ref>
The Government of Andhra Pradesh introduced a law enabling 4 percent reservations for Muslims in 2004. This law was upheld by the Supreme Court in an interim order in 2010 but it constituted a Constitution bench to look further into the issue.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/interim-relief-to-ap-on-muslim-reservation/article304480.ece|title=Interim relief to AP on Muslim reservation|work=The Hindu|date=25 March 2010|access-date=2015-06-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Supreme-Court-to-hear-govt-on-Muslim-quota/articleshow/15113941.cms|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130629123830/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-24/india/32827015_1_muslim-sub-quota-central-educational-institutions-constitution-bench|archive-date=2013-06-29|work=[[The Times of India]]|title=Supreme Court to hear govt on Muslim quota|date=24 July 2012 |url-status=live|access-date=2015-06-14}}</ref> The referral was to examine the constitutional validity of quotas based on religion.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/centre-seeks-scs-approval-on-muslim-reservation/articleshow/30704696.cms?from=mdr|title=Centre Seeks SCs approval on Muslim Reservation|work=timesofindia-economictimes|access-date=2020-03-05}}</ref> [[Kerala Public Service Commission]] has a quota of 12% for Muslims.<ref>{{Cite web|date=7 September 2020|title=Reservation chart by Kerala Public Service Commission|url=https://www.keralapsc.gov.in/index.php/rotation-chart}}</ref> Religious minority (Muslim or Christian) educational institutes also have 50% reservation for Muslim or Christian religions. The Central government has listed a number of Muslim communities as [[List of Muslim Other Backward Classes communities|backward Muslims]], making them eligible for reservation.{{citation needed|date=September 2023}}


==Criticism, controversies and protests==
==Criticism, controversies and protests==
The Union Government on 22 December 2011 announced the establishment of a sub-quota of 4.5% for religious minorities within the existing 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes. The reasoning given was that Muslim communities that have been granted OBC status are unable to compete with [[Hindu]] OBC communities.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-12-23/lucknow/30550356_1_muslims-christian-dalits-religion-based-reservation | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510190929/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-12-23/lucknow/30550356_1_muslims-christian-dalits-religion-based-reservation | url-status=dead | archive-date=10 May 2013 | work=[[The Times of India]] | title=4.5% quota fails to impress Muslims in Uttar Pradesh | date=23 December 2011}}</ref> It was alleged that the decision was announced as the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] announced Assembly elections in five states on 24 December 2011. The government would not have been able to announce this due to the model code of conduct. On 12 January 2012, the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] stayed implementation of this decision for violation of the model code of conduct.<ref name="Election Commission stalls 4.5% sub-quota in poll states">{{cite news | url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-01-12/india/30619149_1_obc-quota-muslims-hindu-obcs | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510200158/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-01-12/india/30619149_1_obc-quota-muslims-hindu-obcs | url-status=dead | archive-date=10 May 2013 | title=Election Commission stalls 4.5% sub-quota in poll states | date=12 January 2012 | work=[[The Times of India]] | access-date=2012-05-28 }}</ref> Later, Justice Sachar, head of the [[Sachar Committee]] that was commissioned to prepare a report on the latest social, economic and educational condition of the [[Islam in India|Muslim community of India]], criticised the government decision, saying "Such promises will not help the backward section of minorities. It is like befooling them. These people are making tall claims just to win elections". He suggested that instead of promising to give reservations, the government should focus on basic issues of improving administration and governance.<ref name="Govt trying to befool minorities with quota: Sachar">{{cite news | url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/228547/govt-trying-befool-minorities-quota.html | title=Govt trying to befool minorities with quota: Sachar | date=19 February 2012 | access-date=2012-02-20}}</ref>
The Union Government on 22 December 2011 announced the establishment of a sub-quota of 4.5% for religious minorities within the existing 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes. The reasoning given was that Muslim communities that have been granted OBC status are unable to compete with [[Hindu]] OBC communities.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/4-5-quota-fails-to-impress-Muslims-in-Uttar-Pradesh/articleshow/11213735.cms | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510190929/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-12-23/lucknow/30550356_1_muslims-christian-dalits-religion-based-reservation | archive-date=10 May 2013 | work=[[The Times of India]] | title=4.5% quota fails to impress Muslims in Uttar Pradesh | url-status=live | date=23 December 2011}}</ref> It was alleged that the decision was announced as the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] announced Assembly elections in five states on 24 December 2011. The government would not have been able to announce this due to the model code of conduct. On 12 January 2012, the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] stayed implementation of this decision for violation of the model code of conduct.<ref name="Election Commission stalls 4.5% sub-quota in poll states">{{cite news | url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Election-Commission-stalls-4-5-sub-quota-in-poll-states/articleshow/11455889.cms | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510200158/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-01-12/india/30619149_1_obc-quota-muslims-hindu-obcs | archive-date=10 May 2013 | title=Election Commission stalls 4.5% sub-quota in poll states | date=12 January 2012 | work=[[The Times of India]] | url-status=live | access-date=2012-05-28 }}</ref> Later, Justice Sachar, head of the [[Sachar Committee]] that was commissioned to prepare a report on the latest social, economic and educational condition of the [[Islam in India|Muslim community of India]], criticised the government decision, saying "Such promises will not help the backward section of minorities. It is like befooling them. These people are making tall claims just to win elections". He suggested that instead of promising to give reservations, the government should focus on basic issues of improving administration and governance.<ref name="Govt trying to befool minorities with quota: Sachar">{{cite news | url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/228547/govt-trying-befool-minorities-quota.html | title=Govt trying to befool minorities with quota: Sachar | date=19 February 2012 | access-date=2012-02-20}}</ref>


On 28 May 2012, the [[Andhra Pradesh High Court]] quashed the sub-quota. The court said that the sub-quota has been carved out only on religious lines and not on any other intelligible basis. The court criticized the decision: "In fact, we must express our anguish at the rather casual manner in which the entire issue has been taken up by the central government.".<ref name="HC Quashes Center's 4.5% Sub-Quota for Minorities">{{cite news | url=http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=763946 | title=HC Quashes Centre's 4.5% Sub-Quota for Minorities | date=28 May 2012 | access-date=2012-05-28 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120529034931/http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=763946 | archive-date=29 May 2012 | df=dmy-all }}</ref>
On 28 May 2012, the [[Andhra Pradesh High Court]] quashed the sub-quota. The court said that the sub-quota has been carved out only on religious lines and not on any other intelligible basis. The court criticized the decision: "In fact, we must express our anguish at the rather casual manner in which the entire issue has been taken up by the central government.".<ref name="HC Quashes Center's 4.5% Sub-Quota for Minorities">{{cite news | url=http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=763946 | title=HC Quashes Centre's 4.5% Sub-Quota for Minorities | date=28 May 2012 | access-date=2012-05-28 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120529034931/http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=763946 | archive-date=29 May 2012 | df=dmy-all }}</ref>


=== Mandal Commission protests of 1990 ===
=== Mandal Commission protests of 1990 ===
Line 378: Line 414:


=== Agitations demanding more reservation ===
=== Agitations demanding more reservation ===
In 2008 and 2010, the Gujjar community in Rajasthan [[Gurjar agitation in Rajasthan|demanded]] reclassification from OBC to ST ([[Scheduled Tribes]]) for increased reservation benefits. They began violently protesting on the streets of Rajasthan and blocked several rail lines. Police firing on Gujjars began a tit-for-tat cycle of violence between Police and Gujjars. The violence ended with 37 people dead. Their move was opposed by the Meenas, the main ST community in Rajasthan.{{citation needed|date=March 2022}}
In 2008 and 2010, the [[Gujjar]] community in Rajasthan [[Gurjar agitation in Rajasthan|demanded]] reclassification from OBC to ST ([[Scheduled Tribes]]) for increased reservation benefits. They began violently protesting on the streets of Rajasthan and blocked several rail lines. Police firing on Gujjars began a tit-for-tat cycle of violence between Police and Gujjars. The violence ended with 37 people dead. Their move was opposed by the Meenas, the main ST community in Rajasthan.{{citation needed|date=March 2022}}


In 2019, the agitation restarted as Gujjars demanded 5% reservation, and began blocking trains to this effect.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ten-trains-affected-as-gujjar-quota-agitation-enters-day-3-1452589-2019-02-10|title=10 trains affected as Gujjar quota agitation enters Day 3|date=February 10, 2019|website=India Today|language=en|access-date=2020-03-24}}</ref>
In 2019, the agitation restarted as Gujjars demanded 5% reservation, and began blocking trains to this effect.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ten-trains-affected-as-gujjar-quota-agitation-enters-day-3-1452589-2019-02-10|title=10 trains affected as Gujjar quota agitation enters Day 3|date=February 10, 2019|website=India Today|language=en|access-date=2020-03-24}}</ref>
Line 386: Line 422:
Beginning in 2015, the [[Patidar]] community (better known as Patel) began [[Patidar reservation agitation|agitating for OBC status]] in Gujarat. This movement consisted of massive demonstrations across the state, led by Hardik Patel. Later many of these protests turned violent, resulting in curfews across the state and crores worth of damage. Talks with the government broke down, and the violence restarted. After the Jat agitation began in 2016, the Patidars flared up again and led a march through Gujarat, but protests in several cities turned violent and the [[Rapid Action Force]] was sent in.<ref name=":0" />
Beginning in 2015, the [[Patidar]] community (better known as Patel) began [[Patidar reservation agitation|agitating for OBC status]] in Gujarat. This movement consisted of massive demonstrations across the state, led by Hardik Patel. Later many of these protests turned violent, resulting in curfews across the state and crores worth of damage. Talks with the government broke down, and the violence restarted. After the Jat agitation began in 2016, the Patidars flared up again and led a march through Gujarat, but protests in several cities turned violent and the [[Rapid Action Force]] was sent in.<ref name=":0" />


In January 2016, the [[Kapu (caste)|Kapu]] community in Andhra Pradesh began leading protests to be classified in Backward Classes. The agitation became violent when in [[Tuni]], Kapu protestors set trains on fire.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-12-03|title=Andhra's caste reservation protests to return? Kapu leaders chalk out action plan|url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/andhras-caste-reservation-protests-return-kapu-leaders-chalk-out-action-plan-53778|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The News Minute|language=en}}</ref> In 2019, the [[Telugu Desam Party]] which had just been made opposition, tabled a bill to have a 5% sub-quota for Kapus out of EWS reservation.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-07-17|title=Why trouble is brewing in Andhra over Kapu reservation once more|url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/why-trouble-brewing-andhra-over-kapu-reservation-once-more-105610|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The News Minute|language=en}}</ref>
In January 2016, the [[Kapu (caste)|Kapu]] community in Andhra Pradesh began leading protests to be classified in Backward Classes. The agitation became violent when in [[Tuni]], Kapu protestors set trains on fire.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-12-03|title=Andhra's caste reservation protests to return? Garp leaders chalk out action plan|url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/andhras-caste-reservation-protests-return-garp-leaders-chalk-out-action-plan-53778|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The News Minute|language=en}}{{Dead link|date=December 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> In 2019, the [[Telugu Desam Party]] which had just been made opposition, tabled a bill to have a 5% sub-quota for Kapus out of EWS reservation.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-07-17|title=Why trouble is brewing in Andhra over Garp reservation once more|url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/why-trouble-brewing-andhra-over-garp-reservation-once-more-105610|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The News Minute|language=en}}{{Dead link|date=December 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
 
[[Maratha (caste)|Marathas]], the dominant caste of Maharashtra, have been agitating for OBC status since the 1990s. In 2016, after the rape and murder of a 15-year old Maratha girl in Kopardi, the Maratha community organized [[Maratha Kranti Morcha|massive protests]] throughout Maharashtra. Their demands included death for the accused as well as reservations for the Maratha community which makes up around 30% of the state's population.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-02-21 |title=Marathas 28% of state population, 84% of them from non-creamy layer: Report |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/marathas-28-of-state-population-84-from-non-creamy-layer-report/articleshow/107866814.cms#:~:text=FEBRUARY%2021,%202024-,Marathas%2028%25%20of%20state%20population,%2084%25%20of%20them%20from%20non-creamy%20layer,-:%20Report |access-date=2025-11-04 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}}</ref> Some road blocks turned violent in 2017 and 2018, but overall the protests were peaceful. Their demand was met when the Maharashtra government instituted a special SEBC (Socially and Educationally Backward Classes) category for them with 16% reservation.<ref name=":0" /> The Supreme Court of India later however, declared the SEBC reservation for Marathas as unconstitutional.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-05-05|title=Supreme Court declares Maratha quota law unconstitutional |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-declares-maratha-quota-law-unconstitutional/article34487043.ece|access-date=2021-11-21|website=The Hindu|language=en}}</ref>


[[Maratha (caste)|Marathas]], the dominant caste of Maharashtra, have been agitating for OBC status since the 1990s. In 2016, after the rape and murder of a 15-year old Maratha girl in Kopardi, the Maratha community organized [[Maratha Kranti Morcha|massive protests]] throughout Maharashtra. Their demands included death for the accused as well as reservations for the Maratha community which makes up 16% of the state's population. Some road blocks turned violent in 2017 and 2018, but overall the protests were peaceful. Their demand was met when the Maharashtra government instituted a special SEBC (Socially and Educationally Backward Classes) category for them with 16% reservation.<ref name=":0" /> The Supreme Court of India later however, declared the SEBC reservation for Marathas as unconstitutional.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-05-05|title=Supreme Court declares Maratha quota law unconstitutional |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-declares-maratha-quota-law-unconstitutional/article34487043.ece|access-date=2021-11-21|website=The Hindu|language=en}}</ref>
Brahmins (8-10% of Maharashtra), under the group Samast Brahmin Samaj have protested in [[Mumbai]], [[Pune]] & [[Sambhaji Nagar]]<ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-01-31 |title=Maharashtra Brahmins unhappy, want separate 4% reservation |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/maharashtra-brahmins-unhappy-want-separate-4-reservation/articleshow/67765301.cms |access-date=2025-11-04 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2021-01-23 |title=Brahmin community demands reservation |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/aurangabad/brahmin-community-demands-reservation/articleshow/80412555.cms |access-date=2025-11-04 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}}</ref> been put forth 15 demands including "additional 4% reservations under EWS" and a fixed pension of Rs.5000<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-01-16 |title=After Marathas, now Brahmins to protest in Mumbai for reservations |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/after-marathas-now-brahmins-to-protest-in-mumbai-for-reservations/story-LDdoR4DCAWbJ9J5gFclCTO.html |access-date=2025-11-04 |website=Hindustan Times |language=en}}</ref> for their community citing the 'rise of economical backwardness amongst them and unemployment with only have 120 days of work'.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2018-12-03 |title=After Marathas, Brahmins in Maharashtra seek reservation |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/after-marathas-brahmins-in-maharashtra-seek-reservation/articleshow/66916397.cms?from=mdr#:~:text=have%20sought%20reservations.-,Anand%20Dave,%20chief%20of%20Akhil%20Bhartiya%20Brahman%20Mahasangh,%20has%20sought%20a,money%20to%20complete%20their%20education,%20and%20therefore,%20they%20need%20reservation.,-Dave%20said%20the |access-date=2025-11-04 |work=The Economic Times |issn=0013-0389}}</ref>


== Economic status ==
== Economic status ==
Line 398: Line 436:


==Exclusions==
==Exclusions==
There are no exclusions for SC/ST people.
In the reservation system in India, the central government notifies castes as SC, ST, or OBC categories based on socio-historical background, while exclusion from reservation benefits is determined by an individual's socio-economic status, nativeness, and religion. For SC and ST individuals, pre-exclusion criteria are employed, while post-exclusion criteria are used for OBCs.<ref>{{cite report|title=Reservation Brochure|url=https://dpe.gov.in/sites/default/files/Reservation_Brochure-2.pdf }}</ref>
 
*For ST individuals, the following categories are not entitled to benefit from the reservation system:
** Immigration from a Scheduled State/UT to a non-Scheduled State/UT.{{efn|name=SCSTlimitation|a). If an individual has migrated recently and temporarily, they can't claim reservation in respect to the migrated state/UT but can claim it in respect to the state/UT of origin.
b). If individuals have migrated permanently in the recent past and have a notable population of the community in the migrated state/UT, the community is mostly notified as OBC or, in some cases, as SC.}}


For OBC's people the following categories are not entitled to take advantage of the reservation system:
* For SC individuals, the following categories are not entitled to benefit from the reservation system:
* Children of officials in high office as per the Constitution.{{efn|Included among the high office holders are the [[President of India]], the [[Vice-President of India]], Judges of the Supreme Court of India, the High Courts chairman, the members of [[Union Public Service Commission]], members of the State Public Service Commission, Chief Election Commissioner, Comptroller Auditor-General of India or any person holding positions of a constitutional nature.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes">{{cite web|title=Judgement Writ Petition (Civil) No.930 of 1990 – Indira Sawhney Versus Union of India And others (16.11.1992)|url=http://ncbc.nic.in/Pdf/OfficeMemorandum.pdf|work=National Commission for Backward Classes|access-date=2011-11-05}}</ref>}}
** Immigration from a Scheduled State/UT to a non-Scheduled State/UT.{{efn|name=SCSTlimitation}}
* Children of civil servants in high positions.{{efn|Included among this category are Class I or Class II officers, unless dead or incapacitated.<ref>[http://ncbc.nic.in/Pdf/OfficeMemorandum.pdf Office Memorandum], ncbc.nic.in, pp. 7–8</ref> The criteria used for Group A and B are the same as the employees of the Public sector.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
** Professing religions other than Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism.{{efn|SC individuals who have converted to Christianity or its progeny generally fall into OBC categories in most states.}}
* Children of [[Indian Armed Forces|armed forces]] officers of high rank.{{efn|High ranks include the rank of colonel and above in the army or in equivalent posts in the [[Indian Navy|Navy]], the [[Indian Air Force|Air Force]], and the Paramilitary Force. But that will hold true provided that-
* For OBC's people the following categories are not entitled to take advantage of the reservation system:
** Children of officials in high office as per the Constitution.{{efn|Included among the high office holders are the [[President of India]], the [[Vice-President of India]], Judges of the Supreme Court of India, the High Courts chairman, the members of [[Union Public Service Commission]], members of the State Public Service Commission, Chief Election Commissioner, Comptroller Auditor-General of India or any person holding positions of a constitutional nature.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes">{{cite web|title=Judgement Writ Petition (Civil) No.930 of 1990 – Indira Sawhney Versus Union of India And others (16.11.1992)|url=http://ncbc.nic.in/Pdf/OfficeMemorandum.pdf|work=National Commission for Backward Classes|access-date=2011-11-05}}</ref>}}
** Children of civil servants in high positions.{{efn|Included among this category are Class I or Class II officers, unless dead or incapacitated.<ref>[http://ncbc.nic.in/Pdf/OfficeMemorandum.pdf Office Memorandum], ncbc.nic.in, pp. 7–8</ref> The criteria used for Group A and B are the same as the employees of the Public sector.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
** Children of [[Indian Armed Forces|armed forces]] officers of high rank.{{efn|High ranks include the rank of colonel and above in the army or in equivalent posts in the [[Indian Navy|Navy]], the [[Indian Air Force|Air Force]], and the Paramilitary Force. But that will hold true provided that-
# "the wife of an armed forces officer is herself in the [[Indian Armed Forces|armed forces]] (i.e., the category under consideration) the rule of exclusion will apply only when she herself has reached the rank of Colonel."
# "the wife of an armed forces officer is herself in the [[Indian Armed Forces|armed forces]] (i.e., the category under consideration) the rule of exclusion will apply only when she herself has reached the rank of Colonel."
# "the service ranks below Colonel of husband and wife shall not be clubbed together"
# "the service ranks below Colonel of husband and wife shall not be clubbed together"
# "if the wife of an officer in the armed forces is in civil employment, this will not be taken into account for applying the rule of exclusion unless she falls in the service category under item No.II in which case the criteria and conditions"<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
# "if the wife of an officer in the armed forces is in civil employment, this will not be taken into account for applying the rule of exclusion unless she falls in the service category under item No.II in which case the criteria and conditions"<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
* Children of professionals and those engaged in trade and industry.{{efn|If a person has a high paying job such as physician, lawyer, [[chartered accountant]], income tax consultant, financial or [[management consultant]], [[dental surgeon]], engineer, architect, [[computer specialist]], film artist or other film professionals, author, playwright, [[sports person]], sports professional, media professional or any other vocations of like status. If the husband holds one of the above jobs and the wife does not then the husband's income will be taken into consideration and if the wife holds one of the above jobs then the wife's income will be taken into consideration. The income of the family as a whole will be taken into account because the whole point of the reservation system is to raise the social status of the people that belong to the SC's, ST's and OBCs and if a family's income is high already it is considered that it raises their social status as well.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
** Children of professionals and those engaged in trade and industry.{{efn|If a person has a high paying job such as physician, lawyer, [[chartered accountant]], income tax consultant, financial or [[management consultant]], [[dental surgeon]], engineer, architect, [[computer specialist]], film artist or other film professionals, author, playwright, [[sports person]], sports professional, media professional or any other vocations of like status. If the husband holds one of the above jobs and the wife does not then the husband's income will be taken into consideration and if the wife holds one of the above jobs then the wife's income will be taken into consideration. The income of the family as a whole will be taken into account because the whole point of the reservation system is to raise the social status of the people that belong to the SC's, ST's and OBCs and if a family's income is high already it is considered that it raises their social status as well.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
* Children of property owners.{{efn|Included in this category are those who have [[irrigated land]] area which is equal to or more than 85% of the [[statutory]] ceiling area will be excluded from the reservation. They would only be under reservation if the land is exclusively unirrigated. Those with vacant buildings can use them for residential, industrial or commercial purposes, hence they are not covered under reservations.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
** Children of property owners.{{efn|Included in this category are those who have [[irrigated land]] area which is equal to or more than 85% of the [[statutory]] ceiling area will be excluded from the reservation. They would only be under reservation if the land is exclusively unirrigated. Those with vacant buildings can use them for residential, industrial or commercial purposes, hence they are not covered under reservations.<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />}}
* Children of people with annual income exceeding {{INR}}8,00,000{{efn|This income does not include salaried income and agricultural income}} (regarded as the "[[creamy layer]]").<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />
** Children of people with annual income exceeding {{INR}}8,00,000{{efn|This income does not include salaried income and agricultural income}} (regarded as the "[[creamy layer]]").<ref name="National Commission for Backward Classes" />


Institutions of Excellence, research institutions, Institutions of National and Strategic Importance such as [[Centre for Development of Advanced Computing]], [[Homi Bhabha National Institute]] and its ten constituent units, the [[Tata Institute of Fundamental Research]] (Mumbai), the [[North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences]] (Shillong), [[Physical Research Laboratory]] (Ahmedabad), the [[Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre]] (Thiruvananthapuram) and the [[Indian Institute of Remote Sensing]] (Dehradun) do not have reservations for higher education.{{efn|Such institutions include the [[Centre for Development of Advanced Computing]], [[Homi Bhabha National Institute]] and its ten constituent units, the [[Tata Institute of Fundamental Research]] (Mumbai), the [[North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences]] (Shillong), [[Physical Research Laboratory]] (Ahmedabad), the [[Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre]] (Thiruvananthapuram) and the [[Indian Institute of Remote Sensing]] (Dehradun).<ref name="pib.nic.in">{{cite web|url=http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=23895|title=Press Information Bureau English Releases|access-date=2015-02-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://indiaresultup.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/3335.pdf|title=Extraordinary Part II - Section I|publisher=The Gazette of India|access-date=24 February 2019}}</ref>}} However Institutes of National Importance such as [[Indian Institutes of Management]] (IIMs),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.iima.ac.in/web/pgp/apply/domestic/important-information|title=Two-Year Post Graduate Programme in Management|publisher=Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad}}</ref>[[Indian Institutes of Technology]] (IITs),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uceed.iitb.ac.in/2020/reservation.html|title=Reservation of Seats|publisher=UCEED}}</ref> [[National Institutes of Technology]] (NIT) and Indian Institute of Information Technology (IIIT) have provision of reservation in admission process for undergraduate and graduate programs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nitp.ac.in/php/facilities.php?pp=concession|title=Concessions Provided for Students|publisher=National Institute of Technology Patna}}</ref>
Institutions of Excellence, research institutions, Institutions of National and Strategic Importance such as [[Centre for Development of Advanced Computing]], [[Homi Bhabha National Institute]] and its ten constituent units, the [[Tata Institute of Fundamental Research]] (Mumbai), the [[North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences]] (Shillong), [[Physical Research Laboratory]] (Ahmedabad), the [[Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre]] (Thiruvananthapuram) and the [[Indian Institute of Remote Sensing]] (Dehradun) do not have reservations for higher education.{{efn|Such institutions include the [[Centre for Development of Advanced Computing]], [[Homi Bhabha National Institute]] and its ten constituent units, the [[Tata Institute of Fundamental Research]] (Mumbai), the [[North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences]] (Shillong), [[Physical Research Laboratory]] (Ahmedabad), the [[Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre]] (Thiruvananthapuram) and the [[Indian Institute of Remote Sensing]] (Dehradun).<ref name="pib.nic.in">{{cite web|url=http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=23895|title=Press Information Bureau English Releases|access-date=2015-02-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://indiaresultup.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/3335.pdf|title=Extraordinary Part II - Section I|publisher=The Gazette of India|access-date=24 February 2019|archive-date=23 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170323054931/https://indiaresultup.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/3335.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>}} However Institutes of National Importance such as [[Indian Institutes of Management]] (IIMs),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.iima.ac.in/web/pgp/apply/domestic/important-information|title=Two-Year Post Graduate Programme in Management|publisher=Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad|access-date=23 February 2020|archive-date=7 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307213820/https://www.iima.ac.in/web/pgp/apply/domestic/important-information|url-status=dead}}</ref>[[Indian Institutes of Technology]] (IITs),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uceed.iitb.ac.in/2020/reservation.html|title=Reservation of Seats|publisher=UCEED|access-date=23 February 2020|archive-date=27 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727165735/http://www.uceed.iitb.ac.in/2020/reservation.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[National Institutes of Technology]] (NIT) and Indian Institute of Information Technology (IIIT) have provision of reservation in admission process for undergraduate and graduate programs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nitp.ac.in/php/facilities.php?pp=concession|title=Concessions Provided for Students|publisher=National Institute of Technology Patna}}</ref>


On 27 October 2015, the Supreme Court directed the state and the Central governments to end the regional quota and to ensure that super-specialty medical courses are kept "unreserved, open and free" from any domicile status after the court had allowed petitions files by some MBBS doctors.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1151028/jsp/nation/story_50076.jsp*.VjByp89X6KA|title=No quota in higher medicine: SC|publisher=[[The Telegraph (Calcutta)|The Telegraph]]|date=27 October 2015}}</ref>
On 27 October 2015, the Supreme Court directed the state and the Central governments to end the regional quota and to ensure that super-specialty medical courses are kept "unreserved, open and free" from any domicile status after the court had allowed petitions files by some MBBS doctors.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1151028/jsp/nation/story_50076.jsp*.VjByp89X6KA|title=No quota in higher medicine: SC|publisher=[[The Telegraph (Calcutta)|The Telegraph]]|date=27 October 2015}}{{dead link|date=February 2023|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!
!Scheduled Caste (SC)
!Scheduled Tribe (ST)
!Other Backward Classes (OBC)<ref>{{Cite news |newspaper=The Telegraph |location=India |title=Supreme Court keeps stated salary and agriculture out of creamy layer |url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/supreme-court-keeps-stated-salary-and-agriculture-out-of-creamy-layer/cid/1827992 |access-date=February 12, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |newspaper=ThePrint |title=Weeks before UP polls, Modi govt shelves proposal to change eligibility for OBC creamy layer |url=https://theprint.in/india/governance/weeks-before-up-polls-modi-govt-shelves-proposal-to-change-eligibility-for-obc-creamy-layer/781628/ |access-date=February 12, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |newspaper=The Economic Times |title=Govt takes OBC creamy layer to drawing board |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/govt-takes-obc-creamy-layer-to-drawing-board/articleshow/88841003.cms |access-date=February 12, 2023}}</ref>
!Economically Weaker Section (EWS)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Form of Certificate to be Produced by a Candidate Belonging to Ews Category |url=https://cdn.digialm.com//per/g01/pub/756/ASM/WebPortal/19/PDF/EWS_Category_2022.pdf |access-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-date=12 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212110755/https://cdn.digialm.com//per/g01/pub/756/ASM/WebPortal/19/PDF/EWS_Category_2022.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Advertisement of Non-Faculty Posts (02/2023 to 06/2023) |website=National Institute of Technology Jalandhar |url=https://www.nitj.ac.in/nitj_files/links/Advt_02_to_06_of_23_(Non_Faculty)_95223.pdf }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |newspaper=The Economic Times |title=Rs 8 lakh income criterion for EWS more stringent than one for OBC creamy layer: Centre to Supreme Court |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/rs-8-lakh-income-criterion-for-ews-more-stringent-than-one-for-obc-creamy-layer-centre-to-supreme-court/articleshow/88651219.cms |access-date=February 12, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWSs) in direct recruitment in civil posts and services in the Government of India |website=Department of Personnel & Training |url=https://dopt.gov.in/sites/default/files/ewsf28fT.PDF |access-date=February 12, 2023}}</ref>
|-
|1. Reservation % of Government of India.
| style="text-align:center"| 15%
| style="text-align:center"| 7.5%
| style="text-align:center"| 27%
| style="text-align:center"| 10%
|-
|2. Is the criteria of 'Government Jobs' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility?
|Not Applicable.
|Not Applicable.
|Applicable. Children of governmental staff belonging to 'Group A' or equivalent categories are not eligible for OBC reservation. There are some criteria for 'Group B' staff also.
|Not Applicable.
|-
|3. Is the criteria of 'Income Limit' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility?
|Not Applicable.
|Not Applicable.
|Applicable. Annual family (other) income of 8 lakhs. Only 'Other Income' is considered. Salary and agricultural income not included while calculating annual family income.
|Applicable. Those with 'Annual family income of 8 lakhs' and above are not eligible. While calculating annual family income, all types of income – (including salary and agricultural income) are included.
|-
|4. Is the criteria of 'Limit on agricultural land' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility?
|Not Applicable
|Not Applicable.
|Not Applicable.
|Applicable. Those families with '5 acres of agricultural land and above' are not eligible.
|-
|5. Is the criteria of 'Limit on residential flat area' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility?
|Not Applicable.
|Not Applicable.
|Not Applicable.
|Applicable. Those with 'Residential flat of 1000 sq. ft and above' are not eligible.
|-
|6. Is the criteria of 'Limit on residential plot area' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility?
|Not Applicable.
|Not Applicable.
|Not Applicable.
|Applicable. Those families with 'Residential plot of 100 sq. yards and above in notified municipalities' are not eligible. Those families with 'Residential plot of 200 sq. yards and above in other areas' are not eligible.
|-
|7. Is this reserved category eligible for the seats of (merit/ non-reserved) category?
|{{Yes}}
|{{Yes}}
|{{Yes}}
|{{Yes}}
|-
|8. Is the general category (non-reserved/ merit) eligible to apply in this reserved category?
|{{No}}
|{{No}}
|{{No}}
|{{No}}
|-
|colspan="5"  style="text-align:center; font-size: 80%; font-style: italic;"|Note: The above table is valid as of January 31, 2023.
|}


==Creamy layer==
==Creamy layer==
{{Main|Creamy layer}}
{{Main|Creamy layer}}
The term ''creamy layer'' was first coined in 1974 in the ''State of Kerala vs N. M. Thomas'' case when a judge said that the "benefits of the reservation shall be snatched away by the top creamy layer of the backward class, thus leaving the weakest among the weak and leaving the fortunate layers to consume the whole cake".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=5862|title=Supreme Court Of India – Judgement Information System}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/oped/scourge-of-reservation-the-invisible-creamy-layer.html|title=Scourge of reservation: The invisible creamy layer|publisher=The Pioneer}}</ref> The 1992 [[Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India]] judgement laid down the limits of the state's powers: it upheld the ceiling of 50.21 percent quotas, emphasised the concept of "social backwardness", and prescribed 11 indicators to ascertain backwardness. The judgement also established the concept of qualitative exclusion, such as "creamy layer".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-order-reserved/|title=Explained: Order reserved|publisher=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/building-a-just-society/|title=For an equitable society, reservations must be extended to private sector|date=23 October 2015|work=The Indian Express|access-date=2016-05-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/plea-to-reconsider-judgment-in-indra-sawhney-case-of-1992/article1897463.ece|title=Plea to reconsider judgement in Indra Sawhney case of 1992|website=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref> The creamy layer applies only to OBCs.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Cant-keep-SC/ST-creamy-layer-out-of-quota-benefits/articleshow/46914401.cms|title='Can't keep SC/ST creamy layer out of quota benefits' - Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=24 February 2019}}</ref> The creamy layer criteria were introduced at Rs 1 lakh in 1993 and revised to Rs 2.5 lakh in 2004, ₹4.5 lakh in 2008 and ₹6 lakh in 2013, but now the ceiling has been raised to ₹8 lakh (in September 2017).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Raise-creamy-layer-to-Rs-10-5-lakh-OBC-panel/articleshow/47155884.cms|title=Raise 'creamy layer' to Rs 10.5 lakh: OBC panel|website=[[The Times of India]]}}</ref> In October 2015, the [[National Commission for Backward Classes]] (NCBC) proposed that a person belonging to OBC with an annual family income of up to ₹15 lakh should be considered as minimum ceiling for OBC.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/OBC-panel-backs-off-wont-make-creamy-layer-reservation-criteria-stringent/articleshow/49545470.cms?|title=OBC panel backs off, won't make 'creamy layer' reservation criteria stringent|website=[[The Times of India]]}}</ref> The NCBC also recommended sub-division of OBCs into "backward", "more backward" and "extremely backward" groups and to divide the 27 per cent quota amongst them in proportion to their population, to ensure that stronger OBCs do not corner the quota benefits.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/OBC-sub-division-relaxing-creamy-layer-is-a-must-NCBC-tells-govt/articleshow/49532421.cms|title=OBC sub-division, relaxing creamy layer is a must: NCBC tells govt|website=[[The Times of India]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Raise-creamy-layer-to-Rs-10-5-lakh-OBC-panel/articleshow/47155884.cms|title=Raise 'creamy layer' to Rs 10.5 lakh: OBC panel|work=The Times of India|access-date=2016-05-08}}</ref>
 
The term ''creamy layer'' was first coined in 1974 in the ''State of Kerala vs N. M. Thomas'' case when Justice VR Krishna Iyer said that the "benefits of the reservation shall be snatched away by the top creamy layer of the backward class, thus leaving the weakest among the weak and leaving the fortunate layers to consume the whole of the cake".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=5862|title=Supreme Court Of India – Judgement Information System|access-date=27 October 2015|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054031/http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=5862|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/oped/scourge-of-reservation-the-invisible-creamy-layer.html|title=Scourge of reservation: The invisible creamy layer|publisher=The Pioneer}}</ref>
 
The 1992 [[Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India]] judgement laid down the limits of the state's powers: it upheld the ceiling of 50.21 percent quotas, emphasised the concept of "social backwardness", and prescribed 11 indicators to ascertain backwardness. The judgement also established the concept of qualitative exclusion, such as "creamy layer".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-order-reserved/|title=Explained: Order reserved|date=23 March 2015 |publisher=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/building-a-just-society/|title=For an equitable society, reservations must be extended to private sector|date=23 October 2015|work=The Indian Express|access-date=2016-05-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/plea-to-reconsider-judgment-in-indra-sawhney-case-of-1992/article1897463.ece|title=Plea to reconsider judgement in Indra Sawhney case of 1992|website=[[The Hindu]]|date=22 August 2007 }}</ref> The creamy layer applies only to OBCs.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Cant-keep-SC/ST-creamy-layer-out-of-quota-benefits/articleshow/46914401.cms|title='Can't keep SC/ST creamy layer out of quota benefits' - Times of India|website=The Times of India|date=14 April 2015 |access-date=24 February 2019}}</ref>
 
The creamy layer criteria were introduced at Rs 1 lakh in 1993 and revised to Rs 2.5 lakh in 2004, ₹4.5 lakh in 2008 and ₹6 lakh in 2013, but now the ceiling has been raised to ₹8 lakh (in September 2017).<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Raise-creamy-layer-to-Rs-10-5-lakh-OBC-panel/articleshow/47155884.cms|title=Raise 'creamy layer' to Rs 10.5 lakh: OBC panel|website=[[The Times of India]]|date=5 May 2015 }}</ref> In October 2015, the [[National Commission for Backward Classes]] (NCBC) proposed that a person belonging to OBC with an annual family income of up to ₹15 lakh should be considered as minimum ceiling for OBC.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/OBC-panel-backs-off-wont-make-creamy-layer-reservation-criteria-stringent/articleshow/49545470.cms?|title=OBC panel backs off, won't make 'creamy layer' reservation criteria stringent|website=[[The Times of India]]|date=27 October 2015 }}</ref>
 
The NCBC also recommended sub-division of OBCs into "backward", "more backward" and "extremely backward" groups and to divide the 27 per cent quota amongst them in proportion to their population, to ensure that stronger OBCs do not corner the quota benefits.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/OBC-sub-division-relaxing-creamy-layer-is-a-must-NCBC-tells-govt/articleshow/49532421.cms|title=OBC sub-division, relaxing creamy layer is a must: NCBC tells govt|website=[[The Times of India]]|date=26 October 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Raise-creamy-layer-to-Rs-10-5-lakh-OBC-panel/articleshow/47155884.cms|title=Raise 'creamy layer' to Rs 10.5 lakh: OBC panel|work=The Times of India|date=5 May 2015 |access-date=2016-05-08}}</ref>


==Reservation in states==
==Reservation in states==
{{More citations needed section|date=December 2020}}
{{More citations needed section|date=December 2020}}


=== Andhra Pradesh ===
; Andhra Pradesh :
Andhra Pradesh state percentage of reservation is around 50%. Including the overall 1/3 reservation for women, 66.66% of seats are reserved in Andhra Pradesh in Education and Government jobs.
Andhra Pradesh state percentage of reservation is around 50%. Including the overall 1/3 reservation for women, 66.66% of seats are reserved in Andhra Pradesh in education and government jobs.


* Scheduled Castes – 15%
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 15%
* Scheduled Tribes – 6%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes – 6%
* Backward Classes (A, B, C, D) – 27%
{{•}} Backward Classes (A, B, C, D) – 27%
* Physically Handicapped (Blind, Deaf & Dumb and OPH) – 3% (1% each)
{{•}} Physically Handicapped (Blind, Deaf & Dumb and OPH) – 3% (1% each)
* Ex-servicemen (APMS only) – 1% (0.5% in general category)
{{•}} Ex-servicemen (APMS only) – 1% (0.5% in general category)
* Women – 33.33% (in all categories, means 16.66% in general category)
{{•}} Women – 33.33% (in all categories, means 16.66% in general category)


Andhra Pradesh BC quota has sub-quotas for castes, classified in A, B, C and D. Addition of disabled, ex-serviceman, women in general category 16.66% makes total reservation percentage 66.66%.  
Andhra Pradesh BC quota has sub-quotas for castes, classified in A, B, C and D. Addition of disabled, ex-serviceman, women in general category 16.66% makes total reservation percentage 66.66%.
In 2018 the government the assembly passed a bill granting 5% reservation to Kapus but this was scrapped in 2019 citing lack of legal standing.<ref>{{Cite web|date=July 30, 2019|first=Amarnath K.|last=Menon|title=Andhra Pradesh: Jagan scraps Kapu quota, says not legally tenable|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/andhra-pradesh-jagan-scraps-kapu-quota-says-not-legally-tenable-1575238-2019-07-30|access-date=2021-02-08|website=India Today|language=en}}</ref>


=== Arunachal Pradesh ===
; Arunachal Pradesh :
Arunachal Pradesh has 80% reservation for Scheduled Tribes.
Arunachal Pradesh has 80% reservation for Scheduled Tribes.


=== Assam ===
; Assam :


* Scheduled Castes – 7%
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 7%
* Scheduled Tribes – 15%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes – 12%
* Other Backward Classes – 27%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 27%
* Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – 10%


Assam provides sub quotas for several other communities such as Morans, [[Moamoria|Mataks]] and [[Tea-garden community of Assam|Tea Tribes]] in medical colleges under the OBC category. In November 2020, Assam's cabinet extended this reservation to [[Rajbongshi people|Koch-Rajbongshis]], [[Ahom people|Ahoms]] and [[Chutia people|Chutias]]. These six communities are demanding Scheduled Tribe status.<ref>{{Cite news|others=Special Correspondent|date=2020-11-01|title=Poll-bound Assam reserves medical seats for 3 communities demanding ST status|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/poll-bound-assam-reserves-medical-seats-for-3-communities-demanding-st-status/article32996633.ece|access-date=2021-02-08|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
Assam provides sub quotas for several other communities such as Morans, [[Moamoria|Mataks]] and [[Tea-garden community of Assam|Tea Tribes]] in medical colleges under the OBC category. In November 2020, Assam's cabinet extended this reservation to [[Rajbongshi people|Koch-Rajbongshis]], [[Ahom people|Ahoms]] and [[Chutia people|Chutias]]. These six communities are demanding Scheduled Tribe status.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2020-11-01|title=Poll-bound Assam reserves medical seats for 3 communities demanding ST status|language=en-IN|newspaper=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/poll-bound-assam-reserves-medical-seats-for-3-communities-demanding-st-status/article32996633.ece|access-date=2021-02-08|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>


In January 2019, Assam approved EWS reservation.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-01-22|title=Assam Becomes Fourth State to Approve 10% Quota for Economically Weaker Sections|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/assam-becomes-fourth-state-to-approve-10-quota-for-economically-weaker-sections-2010167.html|access-date=2021-02-08|website=News18|language=en}}</ref>
In January 2019, Assam approved EWS reservation.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-01-22|title=Assam Becomes Fourth State to Approve 10% Quota for Economically Weaker Sections|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/assam-becomes-fourth-state-to-approve-10-quota-for-economically-weaker-sections-2010167.html|access-date=2021-02-08|website=News18|language=en}}</ref>


=== Bihar ===
; Bihar<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-11-09 |title=Bihar assembly clears bill to hike reservation to 75% |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bihar-assembly-clears-bill-to-hike-reservation-nitish-kumar-caste-survey-101699521752737.html |access-date=2023-11-09 |website=Hindustan Times |language=en}}</ref>:
 
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 20%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes – 2%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 43%
{{•}}Economically Weaker Sections – 10%


* Scheduled Castes – 15%
First implemented in 1970 by [[Karpoori Thakur]], Bihar has a sub-quota within OBC quota of 18% for Extremely Backward Castes (EBCs) and 3% for Backward Caste women in government jobs and educational institutes.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/patna-news/203-castes-in-bihar-to-choose-from-as-2nd-leg-of-survey-begins-april-15-101679588703223.html|title=203 castes in Bihar to choose from as 2nd leg of survey begins April 15|newspaper=Hindustan Times |date=23 March 2023 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=January 25, 2018|first=Madan|last=Kumar|title=EBC: Nitish bats for EBC quota in central jobs, varsities|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/nitish-bats-for-ebc-quota-in-central-jobs-varsities/articleshow/62641063.cms|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref> EWS reservation was implemented in 2019.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Tewary|first=Amarnath|date=2019-01-21|title=10% reservation for EWS will be implemented in Bihar too, says Nitish Kumar|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/10-reservation-for-ews-will-be-implemented-in-bihar-too-says-nitish-kumar/article26049906.ece|access-date=2021-03-31|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
* Scheduled Tribes – 1%
* Other Backward Classes – 34%
*Economically Weaker Sections – 10%


First implemented in 1970 by [[Karpoori Thakur]], Bihar has a sub-quota within OBC quota of 18% for Extremely Backward Castes (EBCs) and 3% for Backward Caste women in government jobs and educational institutes.<ref>{{Cite web|date=January 25, 2018|first=Madan|last=Kumar|title=EBC: Nitish bats for EBC quota in central jobs, varsities|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/nitish-bats-for-ebc-quota-in-central-jobs-varsities/articleshow/62641063.cms|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref> EWS reservation was implemented in 2019.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Tewary|first=Amarnath|date=2019-01-21|title=10% reservation for EWS will be implemented in Bihar too, says Nitish Kumar|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/10-reservation-for-ews-will-be-implemented-in-bihar-too-says-nitish-kumar/article26049906.ece|access-date=2021-03-31|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
The Reservation in the State of Bihar was increased on 9 November 2023.With the existing 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), the effective quota will be 75%.
The main beneficiaries are the EBCs and OBCs, whose quota is proposed to be raised from 12% to 25% and 8% to 18% respectively. According to [[2022 Bihar caste-based survey]], 36.01% of the population are EBCs, and 27.13% are OBCs.For SCs, the proposed new quota is 20%, up from the existing 14%. The SC population is estimated at 19.65%. The quota for STs, however, is proposed to be slashed from 10% to 2%. With most of the tribal areas going to Jharkhand after the bifurcation of Bihar in 2000, the tribal population in Bihar is less than 2%.


=== Chhattisgarh ===
; Chhattisgarh :


* Scheduled Castes – 12%
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 12% ( now 16%)
* Scheduled Tribes – 32%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes – 32% ( now 20%)
* Other Backward Classes – 14%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 14%
* Economically Weaker Sections – no provision
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – no provision


Chhattisgarh: Ordinance on OBC quota hike to 27% has lapsed, says high court.<ref>{{Cite web|author=Vijay Singh Thakur|date=Mar 2, 2020|title=Chhattisgarh: Ordinance on OBC quota hike to 27% has lapsed, says high court {{!}} Raipur News - Times of India|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/raipur/chhattisgarh-ordinance-on-obc-quota-hike-to-27-has-lapsed-says-high-court/articleshow/74437913.cms|access-date=2021-10-28|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref>
Chhattisgarh: Ordinance on OBC quota hike to 27% has lapsed, says high court.<ref>{{Cite web|author=Vijay Singh Thakur|date=Mar 2, 2020|title=Chhattisgarh: Ordinance on OBC quota hike to 27% has lapsed, says high court {{!}} Raipur News - Times of India|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/raipur/chhattisgarh-ordinance-on-obc-quota-hike-to-27-has-lapsed-says-high-court/articleshow/74437913.cms|access-date=2021-10-28|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref>


=== Delhi ===
; Delhi :


* Scheduled Castes - 15%
{{•}} Scheduled Castes - 15%
* Scheduled Tribes - 7%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes - 7%
* Other Backward Classes - 27%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes - 27%


Since Delhi is a Union territory and subject to the Central government, government jobs in Delhi are designated Central Government jobs. In a 2018 Supreme Court decision, it was decided that since Delhi is the capital and no one is an "outsider" there reservations in the territory should follow the all-India pattern. Furthermore, these reserved jobs are open from reserved communities from outside Delhi.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Choudhary|first=Amit Anand|date=30 August 2018|title=Delhi to follow pan India rule for SC/ST reservation, people from other states are entitled: SC|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/delhi-to-follow-pan-india-rule-for-sc/st-reservation-people-from-other-states-are-entitled-sc/articleshow/65611847.cms|access-date=2021-03-31|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref>
Since Delhi is a Union territory and subject to the Central government, government jobs in Delhi are designated Central Government jobs. In a 2018 Supreme Court decision, it was decided that since Delhi is the capital and no one is an "outsider" there reservations in the territory should follow the all-India pattern. Furthermore, these reserved jobs are open from reserved communities from outside Delhi.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Choudhary|first=Amit Anand|date=30 August 2018|title=Delhi to follow pan India rule for SC/ST reservation, people from other states are entitled: SC|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/delhi-to-follow-pan-india-rule-for-sc/st-reservation-people-from-other-states-are-entitled-sc/articleshow/65611847.cms|access-date=2021-03-31|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref>


=== Goa ===
; Goa :


* Scheduled Castes – 2%
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 2%
* Scheduled Tribes – 12%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes – 12%
* Other Backward Classes – 27%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 27%
* Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
* Physically handicapped - 3%
{{•}} Physically handicapped - 3%
* Ex-servicemen - 2%
{{•}} Ex-servicemen - 2%
* Sportspersons - 3%
{{•}} Sportspersons - 3%


In 2014, the quota for OBC reservation was raised from 19.5% to 27%.<ref>{{Cite web|date=January 16, 2014|title=Goa govt increases quota for OBCs in jobs to 27% |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/goa-govt-increases-quota-for-obcs-in-jobs-to-27/articleshow/28859873.cms|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref> In June 2019, Goa implemented EWS reservation in jobs and education.<ref>{{Cite web|date=June 23, 2019|title=Goa and J&K govt order 10% EWS quota to be implemented in jobs and education|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/news/story/goa-and-j-k-govt-order-10-ews-quota-to-be-implemented-in-jobs-and-education-1554512-2019-06-23|access-date=2021-02-08|website=India Today|language=en}}</ref>
In 2014, the quota for OBC reservation was raised from 19.5% to 27%.<ref>{{Cite web|date=January 16, 2014|title=Goa govt increases quota for OBCs in jobs to 27% |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/goa-govt-increases-quota-for-obcs-in-jobs-to-27/articleshow/28859873.cms|access-date=2021-02-08|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref> In June 2019, Goa implemented EWS reservation in jobs and education.<ref>{{Cite web|date=June 23, 2019|title=Goa and J&K govt order 10% EWS quota to be implemented in jobs and education|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/news/story/goa-and-j-k-govt-order-10-ews-quota-to-be-implemented-in-jobs-and-education-1554512-2019-06-23|access-date=2021-02-08|website=India Today|language=en}}</ref>


=== Gujarat ===
; Gujarat :


* Scheduled Castes – 7%
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 7%
* Scheduled Tribes – 15%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes – 15%
* Other Backward Classes – 27%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 27%
* Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – 10%


Gujarat also implemented a 33% reservation for general category women in government jobs. The government also banned reserved category applicants from competing for general category seats, but this was revoked in 2020. Similarly the women reservation was made cutting across all categories in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-02-12|title=Gujarat government in fix over its resolution for open category reservation|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/national/west/gujarat-government-in-fix-over-its-resolution-for-open-category-reservation-804120.html|access-date=2021-03-31|website=Deccan Herald|language=en}}</ref> Gujarat was one of the first states to implement EWS reservation, which applies to general category candidates with less than ₹8 lakhs income, not including other assets like land.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-05-30|title=Gujarat govt sends EWS quota proposal to Centre to implement in colleges|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/ahmedabad/gujarat-government-ews-proposal-economically-weaker-sections-10-per-cent-reservation-in-colleges-to-centre-5755360/|access-date=2021-03-31|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref>
Gujarat also implemented a 33% reservation for general category women in government jobs. The government also banned reserved category applicants from competing for general category seats, but this was revoked in 2020. Similarly the women reservation was made cutting across all categories in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-02-12|title=Gujarat government in fix over its resolution for open category reservation|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/national/west/gujarat-government-in-fix-over-its-resolution-for-open-category-reservation-804120.html|access-date=2021-03-31|website=Deccan Herald|language=en}}</ref> Gujarat was one of the first states to implement EWS reservation, which applies to general category candidates with less than ₹8 lakhs income, not including other assets like land.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-05-30|title=Gujarat govt sends EWS quota proposal to Centre to implement in colleges|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/ahmedabad/gujarat-government-ews-proposal-economically-weaker-sections-10-per-cent-reservation-in-colleges-to-centre-5755360/|access-date=2021-03-31|website=The Indian Express|language=en}}</ref>


=== Haryana ===
; Haryana :


*Scheduled Castes – 20%
{{•}}Scheduled Castes – 20%
* Other Backward Classes – 23%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 23%
* Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
*Ex-servicemen – 5%
{{•}}Ex-servicemen – 5%
*Sportspersons – 3%
{{•}}Sportspersons – 3%
*Physically handicapped – 3%
{{•}}Physically handicapped – 3%


In Haryana OBCs are divided into A, B, C categories, each with 11%, 6% and 6% reservation respectively. Reservations in promotions are different, although still based on population.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Reservation Policy {{!}} Welfare of Scheduled Caste & Backward Classes Department, Government of Haryana|url=http://haryanascbc.gov.in/reservation-policy-0|access-date=2021-03-31|website=haryanascbc.gov.in}}</ref> In 2021, Haryana passed a law mandating 75% reservation in private-sector jobs with incomes less than ₹25,000 for "local" candidates.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-03-08|title=Is Haryana's new reservation law constitutionally tenable?|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/is-haryana-s-new-reservation-law-constitutionally-tenable-101615180936227.html|access-date=2021-03-31|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref>
In Haryana OBCs are divided into A, B, C categories, each with 11%, 6% and 6% reservation respectively. Reservations in promotions are different, although still based on population.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Reservation Policy {{!}} Welfare of Scheduled Caste & Backward Classes Department, Government of Haryana|url=http://haryanascbc.gov.in/reservation-policy-0|access-date=2021-03-31|website=haryanascbc.gov.in}}</ref> In 2021, Haryana passed a law mandating 75% reservation in private-sector jobs with incomes less than ₹25,000 for local candidates.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-03-08|title=Is Haryana's new reservation law constitutionally tenable?|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/is-haryana-s-new-reservation-law-constitutionally-tenable-101615180936227.html|access-date=2021-03-31|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref> However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed this law in 2023 asserting it was unconstitutional.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2023-11-17|title= High Court sets aside Haryana law guaranteeing 75% reservation to locals in private sector|url= https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/high-court-sets-aside-haryana-law-guaranteeing-75-reservation-to-locals-in-private-sector/article67544320.ece/ |access-date=2023-11-17|website=The Hindu|language=en}}</ref>


=== Himachal Pradesh ===
; Himachal Pradesh :


*Scheduled Castes – 25%
{{•}}Scheduled Castes – 25%
*Scheduled Tribes – 4%
{{•}}Scheduled Tribes – 4%
* Other Backward Classes – 20%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 20%
* Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – 10%


In the Scheduled Areas which have a very high percentage of STs, such as [[Kinnaur district|Kinnaur]] and [[Lahaul and Spiti district|Lahaul and Spiti]] districts, percentage of ST reserved seats in government jobs are much higher.
In the Scheduled Areas which have a very high percentage of STs, such as [[Kinnaur district|Kinnaur]] and [[Lahaul and Spiti district|Lahaul and Spiti]] districts, percentage of ST reserved seats in government jobs are much higher.


=== Jharkhand ===
; Jharkhand :
 
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 10%
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes – 26%
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 14% <ref>{{Cite web |title=Jharkhand Raises Reservations for SC, ST, OBC, EWS Groups to 77% |url=https://thewire.in/government/jharkhand-raises-reservations-for-sc-st-obc-ews-groups-to-77 |access-date=2022-09-18 |website=thewire.in |language=en}}</ref>
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
 
BC are currently classified as being in Annexure 1 and Annexure 2.<ref>{{Cite web|title=List of Castes under Category BC (ANNEXURE -II ) in Jharkhand|url=https://jharsewa.jharkhand.gov.in/resources/pdf/20/BC2.pdf|publisher=Government of Jharkhand}}</ref>
 
; Maharashtra :
{{•}} Scheduled Castes (SC) (13%)<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|date=2021-12-30|title=Political reservation for OBCs, now a Maha issue|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/panorama/political-reservation-for-obcs-now-a-maha-issue-1065998.html|access-date=2022-02-12|website=Deccan Herald|language=en}}</ref>
{{•}} Scheduled Tribes (ST) (7%)
{{•}} Other Backward Classes (OBC) (19%)
{{•}}{{•}} Special Backward Classes (SBC) (2%)
{{•}}{{•}} Nomadic Tribes – A (Vimukta jati) (3%)
{{•}}{{•}} Nomadic Tribes – B (2.5%)
{{•}}{{•}} Nomadic Tribes – C ([[Dhangar]]) (3.5%)
{{•}}{{•}} Nomadic Tribes – D ([[Vanjari caste|Vanjari]]) (2%)
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) – 10%


* Scheduled Castes – 10%
[[Maharashtra]] has 62% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-06-21|title=Bill for 16% Maratha quota for PG Medical admission passes Maharashtra legislature test - Key points to know|url=https://www.zeebiz.com/india/news-bill-for-16-maratha-quota-for-pg-medical-admission-passes-maharashtra-legislature-test-key-points-to-know-103020|access-date=2019-06-23|website=Zee Business|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Cabinet approves 10% quota for EWS in general category|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/cabinet-approves-10-quota-for-ews-in-general-category/article25931445.ece|access-date=2019-06-23|website=@businessline|date=7 January 2019 |language=en}}</ref>
* Scheduled Tribes – 26%
* Other Backward Classes – 14%
* Economically Weaker Sections – 10%


BC are currently classified as being in Annexure 1 and Annexure 2.<ref>{{Cite web|title=List of Castes under Category BC (ANNEXURE -II ) in Jharkhand|url=https://jharsewa.jharkhand.gov.in/resources/pdf/20/BC2.pdf|url-status=live|publisher=Government of Jharkhand}}</ref> The present government has proposed raising the OBC quota to 27% and both SC and ST quotas by 2%.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-03-19|title='Jharkhand would recommend SC to remove 50% cap on reservation': CM|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/ranchi-news/jharkhand-would-recommend-sc-to-remove-50-cap-on-reservation-cm-101616171065815.html|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Hindustan Times|language=en}}</ref>
; Uttarakhand :


=== Maharashtra ===
{{•}} Scheduled Castes – 19%
* Scheduled Castes (SC) (13%)<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|date=2021-12-30|title=Political reservation for OBCs, now a Maha issue|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/panorama/political-reservation-for-obcs-now-a-maha-issue-1065998.html|access-date=2022-02-12|website=Deccan Herald|language=en}}</ref>
{{}} Scheduled Tribes – 4%
* Scheduled Tribes (ST) (7%)
{{•}} Other Backward Classes – 14%
* Other Backward Classes (OBC) (19%)
{{•}} Economically Weaker Sections – 10%
** Special Backward Classes (SBC) (2%)
** Nomadic Tribes A (Vimukta jati) (3%)
** Nomadic Tribes – B (2.5%)
** Nomadic Tribes – C ([[Dhangar]]) (3.5%)
** Nomadic Tribes – D ([[Vanjari (caste)|Vanjari]]) (2%)
* Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) – 10%


[[Maharashtra]] has 62% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-06-21|title=Bill for 16% Maratha quota for PG Medical admission passes Maharashtra legislature test - Key points to know|url=https://www.zeebiz.com/india/news-bill-for-16-maratha-quota-for-pg-medical-admission-passes-maharashtra-legislature-test-key-points-to-know-103020|access-date=2019-06-23|website=Zee Business|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Cabinet approves 10% quota for EWS in general category|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/cabinet-approves-10-quota-for-ews-in-general-category/article25931445.ece|access-date=2019-06-23|website=@businessline|language=en}}</ref>
[[Uttarakhand]] has 47% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs. In addition to vertical reservation, the state gives 30% horizontal reservation to women, 5% to the ex-servicemen (ES), 4% to persons with disability (PWD), 2% to the dependants of freedom fighters (DFF), and 5% to the orphans residing in the state-run orphanages.<ref>{{cite web|title=Determination of Post Based Roster Policy|url=https://psc.uk.gov.in/public/uploads/importantrecruitment/981719045.pdf|language=hi|website=[[Uttarakhand Public Service Commission]]|date=22 May 2020|access-date=7 November 2022|archive-date=29 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230129135628/https://psc.uk.gov.in/public/uploads/importantrecruitment/981719045.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Affirmative action]]
*[[Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam]]
*[[Backwardism]]
*[[Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents]]
*[[Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents]]
*[[Court cases related to reservation in India]]
*[[Court cases related to reservation in India]]
*[[Nationalization]]
*[[Forward caste]]
*[[Reservation policy in Bihar]]
*[[Reserved political positions in India]]
*[[Reserved political positions in India]]
*[[Caste politics]]
*[[Caste politics]]
Line 551: Line 673:


==Notes==
==Notes==
{{Notelist|,22
{{Notelist}}
50em}}


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==


*Shourie, Arun (2012). Falling over backwards: An essay on reservations and judicial populism. New Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers. {{ISBN|978-9350293553}}
*Shourie, Arun (2012). Falling over backwards: An essay on reservations and judicial populism. New Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers. {{ISBN|978-93-5029-355-3}}
* {{cite news|last1=Joseph|first1=Manu|title=What If Reservations Had Come To An End In 1960?|url=https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/what-if-reservations-had-come-to-an-end-in-1960/224881|access-date=10 April 2018|work=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook]]|date=23 August 2004}}
* {{cite news|last1=Joseph|first1=Manu|title=What If Reservations Had Come To An End In 1960?|url=https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/what-if-reservations-had-come-to-an-end-in-1960/224881|access-date=10 April 2018|work=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook]]|date=23 August 2004}}


Line 566: Line 687:
* [http://www.ncsc.nic.in/ National Commission for Scheduled Castes]
* [http://www.ncsc.nic.in/ National Commission for Scheduled Castes]
* [http://ncst.nic.in/ National Commission for Scheduled Tribes]
* [http://ncst.nic.in/ National Commission for Scheduled Tribes]
* [http://socialjustice.nic.in/constprov.php Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment]
* [https://socialjustice.gov.in/ Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment]
* {{Cite web | title=Jharkhand Raises Reservations for SC, ST, OBC, EWS Groups to 77% | url=https://m.thewire.in/article/government/jharkhand-raises-reservations-for-sc-st-obc-ews-groups-to-77 | access-date=2025-02-21 | website=m.thewire.in}}


{{India topics}}
{{India topics}}
Line 572: Line 694:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Reservation In India}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Reservation In India}}
[[Category:Affirmative action]]
[[Category:Reservation in India| ]]
[[Category:Reservation in India| ]]
[[Category:Social justice]]
[[Category:Majority–minority relations]]
[[Category:Law of India]]
[[Category:Law of India]]
[[Category:Politics of India]]
[[Category:Politics of India]]

Latest revision as of 05:26, 13 March 2026



Reservation is a system of affirmative action in India that was established during the British Raj. Based on provisions in the Indian constitution, it allows the union government and the states and union territories of India to allocate a specific percentage of reserved quotas or seats, in higher education admissions, employment, political bodies, etc., for "socially and economically backward citizens".[1][2][3] Since its implementation, reservation has been a subject of massive debates and controversies over its impact, execution and effectiveness, significantly shaping the agendas of political parties and the actions of social groups.[4]

History of reservation[edit | edit source]

Before independence[edit | edit source]

Quota systems favouring certain castes and other communities existed before independence in the British Raj. Demands for various forms of positive discrimination has been made, for example, in 1881 and 1891.[5] Chatrapati Shahu (aka Rajarshi Shahu Maharaj), the Maharaja of the princely state of Kolhapur, introduced reservation in favor of non-Brahmin and backward classes, much of which came into effect in 1902. He provided free education to everyone and opened several hostels to make it easier for them to receive it. He also tried to ensure that people thus educated were suitably employed, and he appealed both for a class-free India and the abolition of untouchability. His 1902 measures created 50 percent reservation for educationally deprived communities.[6] In 1918, at the behest of several non-Brahmin organizations criticizing Brahmin domination of administration, the Mysore Raja Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar created a committee to implement reservations for non-Brahmins in government jobs and education over the opposition of his Diwan M. Viswesvaraya, who resigned in protest.[7] On 16 September 1921, the first Justice Party government passed the first Communal Government Order (G. O. # 613), thereby becoming the first elected body in the Indian legislative history to legislate reservations, which have since become standard across the country.

The Imperial parliament at Westminster introduced elements of reservation in the Indian Councils Act 1909 and there were many other measures put in place prior to independence.[5] The depressed classes were provided some seats in 1919 before seeing further increase in 1925.[8]

In 1927, the Madras Presidency provided 44% reservation to Non-Brahmin Hindus, 16% to Brahmins, Muslims, Christians, and Anglo-Indians, and 8% to Scheduled Castes.[9][10]

During the Round Table Conference of June 1932, the Prime Minister of Britain, Ramsay MacDonald, proposed the Communal Award, according to which separate representation was to be provided for Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans. The disadvantaged classes, roughly corresponding to the STs (Scheduled Tribes) and SCs (Scheduled Castes), were assigned a number of seats to be filled by election from constituencies in which only they could vote, although they could also vote in other seats. The proposal was controversial: Mahatma Gandhi fasted in protest against it but many among the depressed classes, including B. R. Ambedkar, had to favor it. After negotiations, Gandhi reached an agreement with Ambedkar to have a single Hindu electorate, with backward classes having more seats reserved within it. Electorates for other religions, such as Islam and Sikhism, remained separate. This became known as the Poona Pact.[11]

In 1942, the Scheduled Castes gained 8.5% reservation in central services and other facilities for the first time.[12]

After independence[edit | edit source]

After the independence of India in 1947 there were some major initiatives in favor of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SCs and STs) and after the 1980s in favour of OBCs (Other Backward Castes) and in 2019 for poor in the general category. The country's affirmative action program was launched in 1950 and is the oldest such programme in the world.[13]

A common form of caste discrimination in India was the practice of untouchability. SCs were the primary targets of the practice, which was outlawed by the new Constitution of India.[14]

In 1954, the Ministry of Education suggested that 20 percent of places should be reserved for the SCs and STs in educational institutions with a provision to relax minimum qualifying marks for admission by 5 percent wherever required. In 1982, it was specified that 15 percent and 7.5 percent of vacancies in public sector and government-aided educational institutes should be reserved for the SC and ST candidates, respectively.[15]

A significant change began in 1979 when the Mandal Commission or the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Commission was established to assess the situation of the socially and educationally backward classes.[16] The commission did not have exact population figures for the OBCs and so used data from the 1931 census, thus estimating the group's population at 52 per cent.[17] In 1980, the commission's report recommended that a reserved quota for OBCs of 27 per cent should apply in respect of services and public sector bodies operated by the Union Government. It called for a similar change to admissions to institutes of higher education, except where states already had more generous requirements.[16] It was not until the 1990s that the recommendations were implemented in Union Government jobs.[18] In 2006, the Union government extended reservations for Other Backward Classes in institutes of higher education it substantially funded.[19] In 2019 the government announces the 10% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs for economically weaker section of the general category.[20]

The Constitution of India states in article 15(4): "Nothing in [article 15] or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially, and educationally backward classes of citizens of or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes."[21] Article 46 of the Constitution states that "The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation."[22]

The Supreme Court of India ruled in 1992 that reservations could not exceed 50 percent, anything above which it judged would violate equal access as guaranteed by the Constitution. It thus put a cap on reservations.[23] However, the recent amendment of the constitution exceeds 50% and also there are state laws that exceed this 50 percent limit and these are under litigation in the Supreme Court. For example, in the State of Tamil Nadu, the caste-based reservation stands at 69 percent and applies to about 89 percent of the population.[24][25]

On 7 November 2022, Supreme Court of India by a 3:2 verdict in Janhit Abhiyan vs Union Of India Writ Petition (Civil) No(S). 55 OF 2019, upheld the validity of the 103rd constitutional amendment carried out to provide legal sanction carve out 10% reservation for the economically weaker sections from unreserved classes for admission in educational institutions and government jobs[26] and held that the 50% cap on quota is not inviolable and affirmative action on economic basis may go a long way in eradicating caste-based reservation.[27][28] This constitutional amendment pushed the total reservation to 59.50% in central institutions.

On 1 August 2024, the Supreme Court of India ruled 6:1 in favor of permitting states to create sub-quotas for Scheduled Castes and Tribes within their reservation schemes.[29] Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud stated that Article 14 of the Constitution of India should be interpreted to mean "that the same law should apply to those who are similarly situated.[30]" Justice Bela Trivedi provided the lone dissent, saying that states did not have the power to "tinker" with the 1950 Presidential List and that the sub-quotas violated Article 14. Justice B.R. Gavai concurred with Chief Justice Chandrachud, but added that the 'creamy layer' concept that applied to OBCs should apply to SC/ST groups as well.[31]

Reservation schemes[edit | edit source]

Caste reservations in universities and jobs of the Central Govt.

In employment[edit | edit source]

Government and public sector will hire job seekers based on reservation percentage from two different categories :

  1. Reservation category (SC, ST, OBC, EWS and other minorities)
  2. Open category (General, SC, ST, OBC, EWS and other minorities).

While hiring, major priority is given to reservation category including 33% reservation for Women, priority in hiring is given by :

  • Other minorities Women
  • ST Women
  • SC Women
  • ST Men
  • SC Men
  • OBC Women
  • OBC Men
  • EWS Women
  • EWS Men

and then after Open category will be considered.

Government and public sector hiring based on merit in open category and one more anomaly here i.e., priority in hiring is the same as for the reserved category.

The landmark initiative of Special Recruitment for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe in Government jobs was started in Kerala in 1972 by Vella Eacharan. The 1993 Supreme Court ruling in the Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India case said that reservations in job promotions are "unconstitutional" or not in accordance with the political constitution but allowed its continuation for five years.[32][23]

In 1995, the 77th amendment to the Constitution was made to amend Article 16 before the five-year period expired to continue with reservations for SC/STs in promotions.[33] It was further modified through the 85th amendment to give the benefit of consequential seniority to SC/ST candidates promoted by reservation.[34]

The 81st amendment was made to the Constitution to permit the government to treat the backlog of reserved vacancies as a separate and distinct group, to which the ceiling of 50 per cent did not apply.[35] The 82nd amendment inserted a provision in Article 335 to enable states to give concessions to SC/ST candidates in promotion.[36]

The validity of all the above four amendments was challenged in the Supreme Court through various petitions clubbed together in M. Nagaraj & Others Vs. Union of India & Others, mainly on the ground that these altered the Basic Structure of the Constitution. In 2006, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments but stipulated that the concerned state will have to show, in each case, the existence of "compelling reasons" - which include "backwardness", "inadequacy of representation" and overall "administrative efficiency - before making provisions for reservation. The court further held that these provisions are merely enabling provisions. If a state government wishes to make provisions for reservation to SC/STs in the promotion, the state has to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class.[37]

In 2007, the Government of Uttar Pradesh introduced reservation in job promotions. However, citing the Supreme Court decision, the policy was ruled to be unconstitutional by the Allahabad High Court in 2011.[38] The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court, which upheld it in 2012 by rejecting the government's argument because it failed to furnish sufficient valid data to justify the move to promote employees on a caste basis.[39]

In education[edit | edit source]

Universities allot seats based on reservation percentage from the same two categories, that is :

  1. Reservation category
  2. Open category

Government Universities will allot based on the same priority as previously mentioned, along with, reservation percentage under consideration for entrance exams fees, for cut off marks, for allotment of seats and also applicable to other government schemes.

In India student aids are available for—SCs, STs, BCs, OBCs, women, Muslims, and other minorities. Only about 0.7% of student aids in India is based on merit.[40]

States[edit | edit source]

In central-government funded higher education institutions, 22.5% of available seats are reserved for Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) students (7.5% for STs, 15% for SCs).[41] This reservation percentage has been raised to 49.5%[41] by including an additional 27% reservation for OBCs. This ratio is followed even in Parliament and all elections where a few constituencies are earmarked for those from certain communities (which will next rotate in 2026 per the Delimitation Commission). Some states and UTs have reservations for females which varies from 5% to 33.33%.

Percentages of reservation for each state[42]
State/UT SC ST OBC EWS Other Reservations Total
Andhra Pradesh[43] 15 6 29 10 60
Andaman and Nicobar Islands 12 38 50
Arunachal Pradesh[44] 80 80
Assam 7 12 27 10 56
Bihar[45] 16 1 33 10 60
Chandigarh 27 27
Chhattisgarh 13 32 14 10 69
Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu 3 9 27 39
Delhi 15 7 27 10 59
Goa 2 12 27 10 51
Gujarat 7 14 27 10 58
Haryana 20 23 10 53
Himachal Pradesh 25 4 20 10 59
Jharkhand 10 26 14 10 60
Karnataka 17 7 32 10 66
Kerala 8 2 40 10 60
Lakshadweep 100 100
Madhya Pradesh 16 20 14 10 60
Maharashtra[46][47] 13 7 32 10 1(Orphan) 63
Manipur 3 34 17 54
Meghalaya 80 80
Mizoram 80 80
Nagaland 80 80
Odisha 16 22 11 10 59
Puducherry 16 34 50
Punjab 29 12 10 51
Rajasthan 16 12 21 10 5 for MBC 64
Sikkim[48] 7 18 40 20 85
Tamil Nadu 18 1 50 69
Telangana[49] 15 10 29 10 64
Tripura 17 31 2 10 60
Uttar Pradesh 21 2 27 10 60
Uttarakhand[50] 19 4 14 10 47
West Bengal 22 6 17 10 55

The exact percentages vary from state to state:

  • In Tamil Nadu, OBC reservation is divided into 26.5% Backward Caste, 3.5 Backward Caste (M) and 20% Most Backward Caste and 10.5% sub quota for Vanniyars, introduced by AIADMK in 2020,7% for DNT. The 7.5% for Vanniyars was quashed void by Madras High Court. The SC quota has 3% sub-quota for Arunthatiyars, introduced by DMK in 2009.[51]
  • In Maharashtra in addition to the reservation for SC/ST/OBC, there is 2% for SBCs, 3% for Nomadic Tribes – NT-A (Vimukta jati), 2.5% for NT-B, 3.5% for NT-C (Dhangar), 2% for NT-D (Vanjari), 10% for SEBC (Maratha) and 1% for Orphan.
  • In Northeast India, e.g. in Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Mizoram, reservation for ST in State Govt. jobs is 80% with only 20% unreserved. In the Central Universities of NEHU (Shillong) and Rajiv Gandhi University, 60% of seats are reserved for ST students.
  • In West Bengal, the OBC community is divided into OBC A & B.[52] In West Bengal there is no reservation on religious basis but some economically and educationally backward Muslim castes (basis surnames pertaining to different profession e.g. cobbler, weaver etc.) have been included along with their Hindu counterparts in the OBC list namely OBC A and OBC B, in both lists caste from both communities are there. But in higher educational institutes, till now there is no reservation for the OBC community but there is reservation in regard to admission in primary, secondary and higher secondary studies.[53][52]

Gender[edit | edit source]

Cisgender women[edit | edit source]

The Women's Reservation Bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha on 9 March 2010 by a majority vote of 186 members in favor and 1 against. As of March 2013, the Lok Sabha has not voted on the bill. Critics say gender cannot be held as a basis for reservation alone other factors should also be considered e.g. economic, social conditions of woman candidates especially when applying reservation for educated women. The criticism points that the policy benefits women that have access to political capital through family circles and are faced with the burden of a huge learning curve. Again, women are divided among caste and class lines with this dichotomy playing an important role in deciding how the presence of women in the lowest tier of governance impact the problems faced by the women of the constituency[54]

In Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, 32% of posts are reserved for females in all government departments and services, such as police, health, education and general administration.[55][56][57] From 2015 onwards Kerala has implemented a 55% reservation for all posts of its local self governing bodies.[58]

On 28 September 2023, the One Hundred and Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India was given ascension after having been introduced during the Special Session of the Parliament of India. The amendment seeks to allocate 33 percent of the seats in the Lok Sabha and elected state legislative assemblies for women.

Transgender and non-binary people[edit | edit source]

In 2017, a drafting committee in Karnataka crafted a policy to create a 1% reservation for transgender people in education and employment.[59] On 21 July 2021, Karnataka implemented the policy, making the state the first in the country to provide one percent reservation for the transgender community in all government services. The government submitted a report to the High Court in this regard, informing that a notification had already been issued after amending the Karnataka Civil Service. The job could be given to males or females, from the same category, in case of the non-availability of transgender candidates.[60]

On April 6, 2015, the Tamil Nadu government's BCC Department issued a government order classifying transgender persons under Other Backward Class status as a caste identity if lacking a community certificate.[61][62] In June 2024, the Madras High Court struck down the order and directed the Tamil Nadu government to provide 1% horizontal reservations to the transgender community in education and employment, ruling that the GO violated Articles 14, 15, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, as well as the National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India verdict.[63]

In June 2024, the Calcutta High Court ordered the government of West Bengal to establish a 1% quota in public employment.[64]

Religion[edit | edit source]

While courts have ruled that reservations on the basis of religion are unconstitutional, several state governments have allotted reservations to religious minorities or backward classes among religious minorities on the basis of socio-educational backwardness and representation.[65][66]

The Tamil Nadu government has allotted 3.5% of seats each to Muslims and Christians, thereby altering the OBC reservation to 23% from 30% (since it excludes persons belonging to Other Backward Castes who are either Muslims or Christians).[67]

The Government of Andhra Pradesh introduced a law enabling 4 percent reservations for Muslims in 2004. This law was upheld by the Supreme Court in an interim order in 2010 but it constituted a Constitution bench to look further into the issue.[68][69] The referral was to examine the constitutional validity of quotas based on religion.[70] Kerala Public Service Commission has a quota of 12% for Muslims.[71] Religious minority (Muslim or Christian) educational institutes also have 50% reservation for Muslim or Christian religions. The Central government has listed a number of Muslim communities as backward Muslims, making them eligible for reservation.[citation needed]

Criticism, controversies and protests[edit | edit source]

The Union Government on 22 December 2011 announced the establishment of a sub-quota of 4.5% for religious minorities within the existing 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes. The reasoning given was that Muslim communities that have been granted OBC status are unable to compete with Hindu OBC communities.[72] It was alleged that the decision was announced as the Election Commission announced Assembly elections in five states on 24 December 2011. The government would not have been able to announce this due to the model code of conduct. On 12 January 2012, the Election Commission stayed implementation of this decision for violation of the model code of conduct.[73] Later, Justice Sachar, head of the Sachar Committee that was commissioned to prepare a report on the latest social, economic and educational condition of the Muslim community of India, criticised the government decision, saying "Such promises will not help the backward section of minorities. It is like befooling them. These people are making tall claims just to win elections". He suggested that instead of promising to give reservations, the government should focus on basic issues of improving administration and governance.[74]

On 28 May 2012, the Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed the sub-quota. The court said that the sub-quota has been carved out only on religious lines and not on any other intelligible basis. The court criticized the decision: "In fact, we must express our anguish at the rather casual manner in which the entire issue has been taken up by the central government.".[75]

Mandal Commission protests of 1990[edit | edit source]

Mandal commission protests of 1990 were against reservation in government jobs based on caste in India.

2006 Indian anti-reservation protests[edit | edit source]

The 2006 Indian anti-reservation protests were a series of protests that took place in India in 2006 in opposition to the decision of the Union Government of India, led by the Indian National Congress-headed multiparty coalition United Progressive Alliance, to implement reservations for the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in central and private institutes of higher education. This move led to massive protests, particularly from students and doctors belonging to the forward castes, who claimed that the government's proposal was discriminatory, discarded meritocracy and was driven by vote-bank politics.

Agitations demanding more reservation[edit | edit source]

In 2008 and 2010, the Gujjar community in Rajasthan demanded reclassification from OBC to ST (Scheduled Tribes) for increased reservation benefits. They began violently protesting on the streets of Rajasthan and blocked several rail lines. Police firing on Gujjars began a tit-for-tat cycle of violence between Police and Gujjars. The violence ended with 37 people dead. Their move was opposed by the Meenas, the main ST community in Rajasthan.[citation needed]

In 2019, the agitation restarted as Gujjars demanded 5% reservation, and began blocking trains to this effect.[76]

Jats have been demanding OBC status since the 1990s. In 2016, they began an agitation to get this status. To this effect they began protesting by blockading roads and lines, but later the protests turned violent. Riots spread to Delhi and western Uttar Pradesh, and even Rajasthan. The epicentre of the violence was in Rothak, and almost ₹34000 crores ($4.8 billion) worth of property was damaged and 30 were killed. Bowing to the pressure, the Haryana government created a special category for Jats and other upper castes called BC, and appointed 10% reservation, but the measure was blocked in court.[77]

Beginning in 2015, the Patidar community (better known as Patel) began agitating for OBC status in Gujarat. This movement consisted of massive demonstrations across the state, led by Hardik Patel. Later many of these protests turned violent, resulting in curfews across the state and crores worth of damage. Talks with the government broke down, and the violence restarted. After the Jat agitation began in 2016, the Patidars flared up again and led a march through Gujarat, but protests in several cities turned violent and the Rapid Action Force was sent in.[77]

In January 2016, the Kapu community in Andhra Pradesh began leading protests to be classified in Backward Classes. The agitation became violent when in Tuni, Kapu protestors set trains on fire.[78] In 2019, the Telugu Desam Party which had just been made opposition, tabled a bill to have a 5% sub-quota for Kapus out of EWS reservation.[79]

Marathas, the dominant caste of Maharashtra, have been agitating for OBC status since the 1990s. In 2016, after the rape and murder of a 15-year old Maratha girl in Kopardi, the Maratha community organized massive protests throughout Maharashtra. Their demands included death for the accused as well as reservations for the Maratha community which makes up around 30% of the state's population.[80] Some road blocks turned violent in 2017 and 2018, but overall the protests were peaceful. Their demand was met when the Maharashtra government instituted a special SEBC (Socially and Educationally Backward Classes) category for them with 16% reservation.[77] The Supreme Court of India later however, declared the SEBC reservation for Marathas as unconstitutional.[81]

Brahmins (8-10% of Maharashtra), under the group Samast Brahmin Samaj have protested in Mumbai, Pune & Sambhaji Nagar[82][83] been put forth 15 demands including "additional 4% reservations under EWS" and a fixed pension of Rs.5000[84] for their community citing the 'rise of economical backwardness amongst them and unemployment with only have 120 days of work'.[85]

Economic status[edit | edit source]

The Union Government tabled the Constitution (One Hundred And Twenty-Fourth Amendment) Bill, 2019 which provided 10% additional quota for the economically weaker sections amongst the erstwhile unreserved category students. The definition of 'economically weaker sections' will be defined by the State from time to time.[86] The constitutional amendment has laid down that they will be restricted to people with household income less than 8 Lakh per annum and those who own agricultural land below five acres. Business Today has commented that these criteria cover almost 100 percent of the population.[87] Several petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court of India challenging the legality of this amendment.[88]

Exclusions[edit | edit source]

In the reservation system in India, the central government notifies castes as SC, ST, or OBC categories based on socio-historical background, while exclusion from reservation benefits is determined by an individual's socio-economic status, nativeness, and religion. For SC and ST individuals, pre-exclusion criteria are employed, while post-exclusion criteria are used for OBCs.[89]

  • For ST individuals, the following categories are not entitled to benefit from the reservation system:
    • Immigration from a Scheduled State/UT to a non-Scheduled State/UT.[lower-alpha 1]
  • For SC individuals, the following categories are not entitled to benefit from the reservation system:
    • Immigration from a Scheduled State/UT to a non-Scheduled State/UT.[lower-alpha 1]
    • Professing religions other than Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism.[lower-alpha 2]
  • For OBC's people the following categories are not entitled to take advantage of the reservation system:

Institutions of Excellence, research institutions, Institutions of National and Strategic Importance such as Centre for Development of Advanced Computing, Homi Bhabha National Institute and its ten constituent units, the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (Mumbai), the North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (Shillong), Physical Research Laboratory (Ahmedabad), the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (Thiruvananthapuram) and the Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (Dehradun) do not have reservations for higher education.[lower-alpha 9] However Institutes of National Importance such as Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs),[94]Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs),[95] National Institutes of Technology (NIT) and Indian Institute of Information Technology (IIIT) have provision of reservation in admission process for undergraduate and graduate programs.[96]

On 27 October 2015, the Supreme Court directed the state and the Central governments to end the regional quota and to ensure that super-specialty medical courses are kept "unreserved, open and free" from any domicile status after the court had allowed petitions files by some MBBS doctors.[97]

Scheduled Caste (SC) Scheduled Tribe (ST) Other Backward Classes (OBC)[98][99][100] Economically Weaker Section (EWS)[101][102][103][104]
1. Reservation % of Government of India. 15% 7.5% 27% 10%
2. Is the criteria of 'Government Jobs' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility? Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Applicable. Children of governmental staff belonging to 'Group A' or equivalent categories are not eligible for OBC reservation. There are some criteria for 'Group B' staff also. Not Applicable.
3. Is the criteria of 'Income Limit' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility? Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Applicable. Annual family (other) income of 8 lakhs. Only 'Other Income' is considered. Salary and agricultural income not included while calculating annual family income. Applicable. Those with 'Annual family income of 8 lakhs' and above are not eligible. While calculating annual family income, all types of income – (including salary and agricultural income) are included.
4. Is the criteria of 'Limit on agricultural land' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility? Not Applicable Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Applicable. Those families with '5 acres of agricultural land and above' are not eligible.
5. Is the criteria of 'Limit on residential flat area' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility? Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Applicable. Those with 'Residential flat of 1000 sq. ft and above' are not eligible.
6. Is the criteria of 'Limit on residential plot area' applicable to this category for reservation eligibility? Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Not Applicable. Applicable. Those families with 'Residential plot of 100 sq. yards and above in notified municipalities' are not eligible. Those families with 'Residential plot of 200 sq. yards and above in other areas' are not eligible.
7. Is this reserved category eligible for the seats of (merit/ non-reserved) category? Yes Yes Yes Yes
8. Is the general category (non-reserved/ merit) eligible to apply in this reserved category? No No No No
Note: The above table is valid as of January 31, 2023.

Creamy layer[edit | edit source]

The term creamy layer was first coined in 1974 in the State of Kerala vs N. M. Thomas case when Justice VR Krishna Iyer said that the "benefits of the reservation shall be snatched away by the top creamy layer of the backward class, thus leaving the weakest among the weak and leaving the fortunate layers to consume the whole of the cake".[105][106]

The 1992 Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India judgement laid down the limits of the state's powers: it upheld the ceiling of 50.21 percent quotas, emphasised the concept of "social backwardness", and prescribed 11 indicators to ascertain backwardness. The judgement also established the concept of qualitative exclusion, such as "creamy layer".[107][108][109] The creamy layer applies only to OBCs.[110]

The creamy layer criteria were introduced at Rs 1 lakh in 1993 and revised to Rs 2.5 lakh in 2004, ₹4.5 lakh in 2008 and ₹6 lakh in 2013, but now the ceiling has been raised to ₹8 lakh (in September 2017).[111] In October 2015, the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) proposed that a person belonging to OBC with an annual family income of up to ₹15 lakh should be considered as minimum ceiling for OBC.[112]

The NCBC also recommended sub-division of OBCs into "backward", "more backward" and "extremely backward" groups and to divide the 27 per cent quota amongst them in proportion to their population, to ensure that stronger OBCs do not corner the quota benefits.[113][114]

Reservation in states[edit | edit source]

Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh state percentage of reservation is around 50%. Including the overall 1/3 reservation for women, 66.66% of seats are reserved in Andhra Pradesh in education and government jobs.

 • Scheduled Castes – 15%  • Scheduled Tribes – 6%  • Backward Classes (A, B, C, D) – 27%  • Physically Handicapped (Blind, Deaf & Dumb and OPH) – 3% (1% each)  • Ex-servicemen (APMS only) – 1% (0.5% in general category)  • Women – 33.33% (in all categories, means 16.66% in general category)

Andhra Pradesh BC quota has sub-quotas for castes, classified in A, B, C and D. Addition of disabled, ex-serviceman, women in general category 16.66% makes total reservation percentage 66.66%.

Arunachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh has 80% reservation for Scheduled Tribes.

Assam

 • Scheduled Castes – 7%  • Scheduled Tribes – 12%  • Other Backward Classes – 27%  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%

Assam provides sub quotas for several other communities such as Morans, Mataks and Tea Tribes in medical colleges under the OBC category. In November 2020, Assam's cabinet extended this reservation to Koch-Rajbongshis, Ahoms and Chutias. These six communities are demanding Scheduled Tribe status.[115]

In January 2019, Assam approved EWS reservation.[116]

Bihar[117]

 • Scheduled Castes – 20%  • Scheduled Tribes – 2%  • Other Backward Classes – 43%  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%

First implemented in 1970 by Karpoori Thakur, Bihar has a sub-quota within OBC quota of 18% for Extremely Backward Castes (EBCs) and 3% for Backward Caste women in government jobs and educational institutes.[118][119] EWS reservation was implemented in 2019.[120]

The Reservation in the State of Bihar was increased on 9 November 2023.With the existing 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), the effective quota will be 75%. The main beneficiaries are the EBCs and OBCs, whose quota is proposed to be raised from 12% to 25% and 8% to 18% respectively. According to 2022 Bihar caste-based survey, 36.01% of the population are EBCs, and 27.13% are OBCs.For SCs, the proposed new quota is 20%, up from the existing 14%. The SC population is estimated at 19.65%. The quota for STs, however, is proposed to be slashed from 10% to 2%. With most of the tribal areas going to Jharkhand after the bifurcation of Bihar in 2000, the tribal population in Bihar is less than 2%.

Chhattisgarh

 • Scheduled Castes – 12% ( now 16%)  • Scheduled Tribes – 32% ( now 20%)  • Other Backward Classes – 14%  • Economically Weaker Sections – no provision

Chhattisgarh: Ordinance on OBC quota hike to 27% has lapsed, says high court.[121]

Delhi

 • Scheduled Castes - 15%  • Scheduled Tribes - 7%  • Other Backward Classes - 27%

Since Delhi is a Union territory and subject to the Central government, government jobs in Delhi are designated Central Government jobs. In a 2018 Supreme Court decision, it was decided that since Delhi is the capital and no one is an "outsider" there reservations in the territory should follow the all-India pattern. Furthermore, these reserved jobs are open from reserved communities from outside Delhi.[122]

Goa

 • Scheduled Castes – 2%  • Scheduled Tribes – 12%  • Other Backward Classes – 27%  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%  • Physically handicapped - 3%  • Ex-servicemen - 2%  • Sportspersons - 3%

In 2014, the quota for OBC reservation was raised from 19.5% to 27%.[123] In June 2019, Goa implemented EWS reservation in jobs and education.[124]

Gujarat

 • Scheduled Castes – 7%  • Scheduled Tribes – 15%  • Other Backward Classes – 27%  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%

Gujarat also implemented a 33% reservation for general category women in government jobs. The government also banned reserved category applicants from competing for general category seats, but this was revoked in 2020. Similarly the women reservation was made cutting across all categories in 2020.[125] Gujarat was one of the first states to implement EWS reservation, which applies to general category candidates with less than ₹8 lakhs income, not including other assets like land.[126]

Haryana

 • Scheduled Castes – 20%  • Other Backward Classes – 23%  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%  • Ex-servicemen – 5%  • Sportspersons – 3%  • Physically handicapped – 3%

In Haryana OBCs are divided into A, B, C categories, each with 11%, 6% and 6% reservation respectively. Reservations in promotions are different, although still based on population.[127] In 2021, Haryana passed a law mandating 75% reservation in private-sector jobs with incomes less than ₹25,000 for local candidates.[128] However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed this law in 2023 asserting it was unconstitutional.[129]

Himachal Pradesh

 • Scheduled Castes – 25%  • Scheduled Tribes – 4%  • Other Backward Classes – 20%  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%

In the Scheduled Areas which have a very high percentage of STs, such as Kinnaur and Lahaul and Spiti districts, percentage of ST reserved seats in government jobs are much higher.

Jharkhand

 • Scheduled Castes – 10%  • Scheduled Tribes – 26%  • Other Backward Classes – 14% [130]  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%

BC are currently classified as being in Annexure 1 and Annexure 2.[131]

Maharashtra

 • Scheduled Castes (SC) (13%)[132]  • Scheduled Tribes (ST) (7%)  • Other Backward Classes (OBC) (19%)  •  • Special Backward Classes (SBC) (2%)  •  • Nomadic Tribes – A (Vimukta jati) (3%)  •  • Nomadic Tribes – B (2.5%)  •  • Nomadic Tribes – C (Dhangar) (3.5%)  •  • Nomadic Tribes – D (Vanjari) (2%)  • Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) – 10%

Maharashtra has 62% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs.[133][134]

Uttarakhand

 • Scheduled Castes – 19%  • Scheduled Tribes – 4%  • Other Backward Classes – 14%  • Economically Weaker Sections – 10%

Uttarakhand has 47% reservation in educational institutions and government jobs. In addition to vertical reservation, the state gives 30% horizontal reservation to women, 5% to the ex-servicemen (ES), 4% to persons with disability (PWD), 2% to the dependants of freedom fighters (DFF), and 5% to the orphans residing in the state-run orphanages.[135]

See also[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 a). If an individual has migrated recently and temporarily, they can't claim reservation in respect to the migrated state/UT but can claim it in respect to the state/UT of origin. b). If individuals have migrated permanently in the recent past and have a notable population of the community in the migrated state/UT, the community is mostly notified as OBC or, in some cases, as SC.
  2. SC individuals who have converted to Christianity or its progeny generally fall into OBC categories in most states.
  3. Included among the high office holders are the President of India, the Vice-President of India, Judges of the Supreme Court of India, the High Courts chairman, the members of Union Public Service Commission, members of the State Public Service Commission, Chief Election Commissioner, Comptroller Auditor-General of India or any person holding positions of a constitutional nature.[90]
  4. Included among this category are Class I or Class II officers, unless dead or incapacitated.[91] The criteria used for Group A and B are the same as the employees of the Public sector.[90]
  5. High ranks include the rank of colonel and above in the army or in equivalent posts in the Navy, the Air Force, and the Paramilitary Force. But that will hold true provided that-
    1. "the wife of an armed forces officer is herself in the armed forces (i.e., the category under consideration) the rule of exclusion will apply only when she herself has reached the rank of Colonel."
    2. "the service ranks below Colonel of husband and wife shall not be clubbed together"
    3. "if the wife of an officer in the armed forces is in civil employment, this will not be taken into account for applying the rule of exclusion unless she falls in the service category under item No.II in which case the criteria and conditions"[90]
  6. If a person has a high paying job such as physician, lawyer, chartered accountant, income tax consultant, financial or management consultant, dental surgeon, engineer, architect, computer specialist, film artist or other film professionals, author, playwright, sports person, sports professional, media professional or any other vocations of like status. If the husband holds one of the above jobs and the wife does not then the husband's income will be taken into consideration and if the wife holds one of the above jobs then the wife's income will be taken into consideration. The income of the family as a whole will be taken into account because the whole point of the reservation system is to raise the social status of the people that belong to the SC's, ST's and OBCs and if a family's income is high already it is considered that it raises their social status as well.[90]
  7. Included in this category are those who have irrigated land area which is equal to or more than 85% of the statutory ceiling area will be excluded from the reservation. They would only be under reservation if the land is exclusively unirrigated. Those with vacant buildings can use them for residential, industrial or commercial purposes, hence they are not covered under reservations.[90]
  8. This income does not include salaried income and agricultural income
  9. Such institutions include the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing, Homi Bhabha National Institute and its ten constituent units, the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (Mumbai), the North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (Shillong), Physical Research Laboratory (Ahmedabad), the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (Thiruvananthapuram) and the Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (Dehradun).[92][93]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Soren, Chunuram (May 2022). "RESERVATION IN INDIA: RHETORIC AND REALITY". International Journal of Advanced Research. 10 (5).
  2. "Reservation Is About Adequate Representation, Not Poverty Eradication". The Wire. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
  3. Rajagopal, Krishnadas (11 June 2020). "Right to reservation is not a fundamental right, observes SC judge as parties withdraw plea for quota". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
  4. "Reservation as a political imperative". Frontline. 27 August 2020.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Laskar, Mehbubul Hassan. "Rethinking Reservation in Higher EDUCATION in India" (PDF). ILI Law Review. pp. 29–30. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 April 2012.
  6. Ghadyalpatil, Abhiram (10 August 2018). "Rajarshi Shahu Chhatrapati of Kolhapur, a reformer ahead of his time". mint. Retrieved 2 October 2021.
  7. "Reserved uncertainty or deserved certainty? Reservation debate back in Mysuru". The New Indian Express. 17 February 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2021.
  8. Boris, E.; Janssens, A. (1999). Complicating Categories: Gender, Class, Race and Ethnicity. International Review of Social History Supplements. Cambridge University Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-521-78641-6.
  9. Kandasamy, W.B.V. (2009). Reservation for Other Backward Classes in Indian Central Government Institutions Like IITs, IIMs and AIIMS – A Study of the Role of Media Fuzzy Super FRM Models: A Study of the Role of Media Using Fuzzy Super Frm Models. Editura CuArt. p. 212. ISBN 978-1-59973-092-9.
  10. "69 percent quota: Advantage TN". The New Indian Express. 14 July 2010.
  11. Menon, V. P. (1957). Transfer of Power in India (Reprinted ed.). Orient Blackswan. pp. 49–50. ISBN 978-81-250-0884-2.
  12. Yamamoto, T.; Ueda, T. (2018). Law and Democracy in Contemporary India: Constitution, Contact Zone, and Performing Rights. Human Rights Interventions. Springer International Publishing. p. 33. ISBN 978-3-319-95837-8. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
  13. "Human Development Report 2016" (PDF). UNDP. p. 119. Retrieved 21 March 2017.
  14. Passin, Herbert (October 1955). "Untouchability in the Far East". Monumenta Nipponica. 11 (3): 247–267. doi:10.2307/2382914. JSTOR 2382914.
  15. "Educational Safeguards". Department of Education. Government of India. Archived from the original on 19 June 2009. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Bhattacharya, Amit (8 April 2006). "Who are the OBCs?". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 27 June 2006. Retrieved 19 April 2006.
  17. Ramaiah, A. (6 June 1992). "Identifying Other Backward Classes" (PDF). Economic and Political Weekly. pp. 1203–1207. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 December 2005. Retrieved 27 May 2006.
  18. "Implementation of Recommendations of Mandal Commission". Parliament of India. Retrieved 4 November 2011.
  19. "How changes in the reservation system in 2006 sowed the seeds for today's campus tumult". Scroll. 4 April 2016. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
  20. "10% EWS quota comes into force". The Indian Express. 15 January 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2025.
  21. Template:Cite constitution
  22. Template:Cite constitution
  23. 23.0 23.1 "Indra Sawhney Etc. vs Union of India And Others, Etc. on 16 November, 1992". IndianKanoon.org. Retrieved 22 August 2012. (4) Reservation being an extreme form of protective measure or affirmative action it should be confined to minority of seats. Even though the Constitution does not lay down any specific bar but the constitutional philosophy being against proportional equality the principle of balancing equality ordains reservation, of any manner, not to exceed 50%.", "Reservation in promotion is constitutionally impermissible as once the advantaged and disadvantaged are made equal and are brought in one class or group then any further benefit extended for promotion on the inequality existing prior to being brought in the group would be treating equals unequally. It would not be eradicating the effects of past discrimination but perpetuating it.
  24. Dharmadhikari, Sanyukta (29 March 2021). "How Tamil Nadu's reservation stands at 69% despite the 50% quota cap". The News Minute. Retrieved 26 January 2025.
  25. S, Mohamed Imranullah (3 April 2024). "89% of Tamil Nadu's population already eligible for reservation, State tells Madras High Court". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 26 January 2025.
  26. "Quotas for poor among 'forward castes' upheld: Here's the case and what the SC has ruled". 7 November 2022.
  27. "Supreme Court upholds EWS quota in 3-2 split verdict, CJI in minority". The Times of India. 8 November 2022.
  28. "Reservation policy cannot stay for indefinite period, says Supreme Court". The Hindu. 7 November 2022.
  29. "Validity of Sub-Classification Within Reserved Categories". Supreme Court Observer. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  30. "Sub-Classification Within Reserved Categories | Judgement Summary". Supreme Court Observer. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  31. "Sub-Classification Within Reserved Categories | Judgement Matrix". Supreme Court Observer. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
  32. "BJP's OBC pitch: How stronger new backward classes panel will function". The Indian Express. 18 April 2017.
  33. "Seventy Seventh Amendment". Indiacode.nic.in. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  34. "Eighty Fifth Amendment". Indiacode.nic.in. 4 January 2002. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  35. "Eighty First Amendment". Indiacode.nic.in. 29 August 1997. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  36. "Eighty Second Amendment". Indiacode.nic.in. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  37. Kapadia, S. H. "M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union of India & Others on 19 October 2006". Retrieved 22 August 2012. We reiterate that the ceiling-limit of 50%, the concept of creamy layer and the compelling reasons, namely, backwardness, inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiency are all constitutional requirements without which the structure of equality of opportunity in Article 16 would collapse.", "As stated above, the impugned provision is an enabling provision. The State is not bound to make reservation for SC/ST in matter of promotions.
  38. "Promotion quota not legally sustainable: HC". The Times of India. 5 January 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2012.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  39. "Supreme Court upholds High court's decision to quash quota in promotion". The Times of India. 28 April 2012. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2012.
  40. "Guess how many Indians get merit-based scholarship". Rediff. 1 September 2014. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  41. 41.0 41.1 "Affirmative Action and Peer Effects: Evidence from Caste Based Reservation in General Education Colleges in India" (PDF). Virginia University, Virginia. Retrieved 5 November 2011.
  42. Reservation guidelines (PDF) (Report). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 August 2024. Retrieved 12 August 2024.
  43. Raghavendra, V. (15 July 2021). "A.P. govt announces 10% reservation for EWS". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
  44. "THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY THIRD AMENDMENT) ACT 2000|Legislative Department | Ministry of Law and Justice | GoI". legislative.gov.in. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
  45. "Patna high court strikes down Bihar govt's 65% reservation in jobs, education". The Times of India. 20 June 2024. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 17 July 2024.
  46. "No error in junking Maratha quota, won't review it: Supreme Court". The Times of India. 22 April 2023. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 17 July 2024.
  47. "Supreme Court throws out Maratha quota law, cites 50% reservation cap". The Indian Express. 6 May 2021. Retrieved 17 July 2024.
  48. "Department Of Personnel | State Portal-Sikkim". sikkim.gov.in. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
  49. "Telangana State Public Service Commission".[permanent dead link]
  50. "Determination of Post Based Roster Policy" (PDF). Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (in हिन्दी). 22 May 2020. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 January 2023. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
  51. "Status of Reservation of OBC in Various States". pib.nic.in. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  52. 52.0 52.1 "Backward Classes Welfare Department, Government of West Bengal". Retrieved 2 February 2015.
  53. "BCW Department-Govt of West Bengal, Reservation". Archived from the original on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 2 February 2015.
  54. M S, Navaneeth. "Reservations for Women in Kerala's Local Self-government Institutions: A Mere Tokenism?". International Journal of Law Management and Humanities. 3: 4.
  55. "33% reservation for women in all Gujarat state government jobs". Deccan Herald. 13 October 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
  56. "Gujarat increases women's reservation to 33% in government jobs". dna. 14 October 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
  57. Arora, N.D. (2010). Political Science for Civil Services Main Examination. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-07-009094-1.
  58. "Local body polls: Women fight on two fronts as parties reluctant to give out general seats". OnManorama. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  59. "Transgender policy cleared by Karnataka cabinet". The Indian Express. 27 October 2017. Retrieved 4 February 2024.
  60. "Karnataka Is The First State To Provide 1% Reservation To Transgenders In Govt Services". India Times. 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  61. B.A, Pon Vasanth (16 May 2017). "Withholding of my appointment orders unfair: transwoman". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 7 June 2024.
  62. "Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare (BCC) Department" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2024.
  63. Sigamany, Azeefa Fathima, Vidya (2 June 2024). "Madras HC directs TN government to implement horizontal reservation for trans persons". The News Minute. Retrieved 6 June 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  64. "Calcutta HC orders 1% transgender quota in govt employments in West Bengal". The Times of India. 17 June 2024. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
  65. Faizee, Shameem (23 February 2010). "Reservation on basis of religion". The Economic Times. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  66. "Expert Explains: A brief history of religion-based reservations in India; the question of Muslims' inclusion". The Indian Express. 7 May 2024. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
  67. Viswanathan, S. (16 November 2007). "A step forward". Frontline. Vol. 24, no. 22. Archived from the original on 20 November 2010.
  68. "Interim relief to AP on Muslim reservation". The Hindu. 25 March 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  69. "Supreme Court to hear govt on Muslim quota". The Times of India. 24 July 2012. Retrieved 14 June 2015.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  70. "Centre Seeks SCs approval on Muslim Reservation". timesofindia-economictimes. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
  71. "Reservation chart by Kerala Public Service Commission". 7 September 2020.
  72. "4.5% quota fails to impress Muslims in Uttar Pradesh". The Times of India. 23 December 2011. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013.
  73. "Election Commission stalls 4.5% sub-quota in poll states". The Times of India. 12 January 2012. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 28 May 2012.
  74. "Govt trying to befool minorities with quota: Sachar". 19 February 2012. Retrieved 20 February 2012.
  75. "HC Quashes Centre's 4.5% Sub-Quota for Minorities". 28 May 2012. Archived from the original on 29 May 2012. Retrieved 28 May 2012.
  76. "10 trains affected as Gujjar quota agitation enters Day 3". India Today. 10 February 2019. Retrieved 24 March 2020.
  77. 77.0 77.1 77.2 "Jats, Marathas, and Patels Want Quotas, But Do They Need Them?". Economic and Political Weekly: 7–8. 5 June 2015.
  78. "Andhra's caste reservation protests to return? Garp leaders chalk out action plan". The News Minute. 3 December 2016. Retrieved 8 February 2021.[permanent dead link]
  79. "Why trouble is brewing in Andhra over Garp reservation once more". The News Minute. 17 July 2019. Retrieved 8 February 2021.[permanent dead link]
  80. "Marathas 28% of state population, 84% of them from non-creamy layer: Report". The Times of India. 21 February 2024. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 4 November 2025.
  81. "Supreme Court declares Maratha quota law unconstitutional". The Hindu. 5 May 2021. Retrieved 21 November 2021.
  82. "Maharashtra Brahmins unhappy, want separate 4% reservation". The Times of India. 31 January 2019. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 4 November 2025.
  83. "Brahmin community demands reservation". The Times of India. 23 January 2021. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 4 November 2025.
  84. "After Marathas, now Brahmins to protest in Mumbai for reservations". Hindustan Times. 16 January 2019. Retrieved 4 November 2025.
  85. "After Marathas, Brahmins in Maharashtra seek reservation". The Economic Times. 3 December 2018. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 4 November 2025.
  86. ET Explains: What is Constitution (One Hundred And third Amendment) Bill, 2019?, The Economic Times, 9 January 2019.
  87. In-depth: Who is eligible for the new reservation quota for general category?, Business Today, 8 January 2019.
  88. "Challenge to reservation for economically poor". 1, Law Street. 11 February 2019. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
  89. Reservation Brochure (PDF) (Report).
  90. 90.0 90.1 90.2 90.3 90.4 90.5 "Judgement Writ Petition (Civil) No.930 of 1990 – Indira Sawhney Versus Union of India And others (16.11.1992)" (PDF). National Commission for Backward Classes. Retrieved 5 November 2011.
  91. Office Memorandum, ncbc.nic.in, pp. 7–8
  92. "Press Information Bureau English Releases". Retrieved 2 February 2015.
  93. "Extraordinary Part II - Section I" (PDF). The Gazette of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 March 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  94. "Two-Year Post Graduate Programme in Management". Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  95. "Reservation of Seats". UCEED. Archived from the original on 27 July 2020. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  96. "Concessions Provided for Students". National Institute of Technology Patna.
  97. "No quota in higher medicine: SC". The Telegraph. 27 October 2015.[dead link]
  98. "Supreme Court keeps stated salary and agriculture out of creamy layer". The Telegraph. India. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  99. "Weeks before UP polls, Modi govt shelves proposal to change eligibility for OBC creamy layer". ThePrint. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  100. "Govt takes OBC creamy layer to drawing board". The Economic Times. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  101. "Form of Certificate to be Produced by a Candidate Belonging to Ews Category" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 February 2023. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  102. "Advertisement of Non-Faculty Posts (02/2023 to 06/2023)" (PDF). National Institute of Technology Jalandhar.
  103. "Rs 8 lakh income criterion for EWS more stringent than one for OBC creamy layer: Centre to Supreme Court". The Economic Times. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  104. "Reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWSs) in direct recruitment in civil posts and services in the Government of India" (PDF). Department of Personnel & Training. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  105. "Supreme Court Of India – Judgement Information System". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  106. "Scourge of reservation: The invisible creamy layer". The Pioneer.
  107. "Explained: Order reserved". The Indian Express. 23 March 2015.
  108. "For an equitable society, reservations must be extended to private sector". The Indian Express. 23 October 2015. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  109. "Plea to reconsider judgement in Indra Sawhney case of 1992". The Hindu. 22 August 2007.
  110. "'Can't keep SC/ST creamy layer out of quota benefits' - Times of India". The Times of India. 14 April 2015. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  111. "Raise 'creamy layer' to Rs 10.5 lakh: OBC panel". The Times of India. 5 May 2015.
  112. "OBC panel backs off, won't make 'creamy layer' reservation criteria stringent". The Times of India. 27 October 2015.
  113. "OBC sub-division, relaxing creamy layer is a must: NCBC tells govt". The Times of India. 26 October 2015.
  114. "Raise 'creamy layer' to Rs 10.5 lakh: OBC panel". The Times of India. 5 May 2015. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  115. "Poll-bound Assam reserves medical seats for 3 communities demanding ST status". The Hindu. 1 November 2020. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  116. "Assam Becomes Fourth State to Approve 10% Quota for Economically Weaker Sections". News18. 22 January 2019. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  117. "Bihar assembly clears bill to hike reservation to 75%". Hindustan Times. 9 November 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2023.
  118. "203 castes in Bihar to choose from as 2nd leg of survey begins April 15". Hindustan Times. 23 March 2023.
  119. Kumar, Madan (25 January 2018). "EBC: Nitish bats for EBC quota in central jobs, varsities". The Times of India. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  120. Tewary, Amarnath (21 January 2019). "10% reservation for EWS will be implemented in Bihar too, says Nitish Kumar". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  121. Vijay Singh Thakur (2 March 2020). "Chhattisgarh: Ordinance on OBC quota hike to 27% has lapsed, says high court | Raipur News - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 28 October 2021.
  122. Choudhary, Amit Anand (30 August 2018). "Delhi to follow pan India rule for SC/ST reservation, people from other states are entitled: SC". The Times of India. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  123. "Goa govt increases quota for OBCs in jobs to 27%". The Times of India. 16 January 2014. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  124. "Goa and J&K govt order 10% EWS quota to be implemented in jobs and education". India Today. 23 June 2019. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  125. "Gujarat government in fix over its resolution for open category reservation". Deccan Herald. 12 February 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  126. "Gujarat govt sends EWS quota proposal to Centre to implement in colleges". The Indian Express. 30 May 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  127. "Reservation Policy | Welfare of Scheduled Caste & Backward Classes Department, Government of Haryana". haryanascbc.gov.in. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  128. "Is Haryana's new reservation law constitutionally tenable?". Hindustan Times. 8 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  129. "High Court sets aside Haryana law guaranteeing 75% reservation to locals in private sector". The Hindu. 17 November 2023. Retrieved 17 November 2023.
  130. "Jharkhand Raises Reservations for SC, ST, OBC, EWS Groups to 77%". thewire.in. Retrieved 18 September 2022.
  131. "List of Castes under Category BC (ANNEXURE -II ) in Jharkhand" (PDF). Government of Jharkhand.
  132. "Political reservation for OBCs, now a Maha issue". Deccan Herald. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2022.
  133. "Bill for 16% Maratha quota for PG Medical admission passes Maharashtra legislature test - Key points to know". Zee Business. 21 June 2019. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
  134. "Cabinet approves 10% quota for EWS in general category". @businessline. 7 January 2019. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
  135. "Determination of Post Based Roster Policy" (PDF). Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (in हिन्दी). 22 May 2020. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 January 2023. Retrieved 7 November 2022.

Further reading[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]