Created by ChetSena61
Last edited February 24, 2026


Barman Thar
বৰ্মন ঠাৰ
Pronunciation/bɔɾmɔn thaɾ/
Native toArunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Nagaland
RegionNortheast India, Kamarupa
EthnicityBarman Kacharis
Native speakers
24,000 (2017)[1]
Assamese alphabet (presently used)
Sylheti Nagri (formerly used)
Language codes
ISO 639-3

Barman Thar (IPA: /bɔɾmɔn thaɾ/), where “thar” means language, is a highly endangered language. It is a Tibeto-Burman language that belongs to the Boro–Garo sub-group. The population of the Barman Kachari community is 24,237, according to a 2017 census. However, only a small part of this population speaks the language.[1]

History[edit | edit source]

The Barman Kacharis are an indigenous Assamese community of Northeast India.[2] They are mainly found in the districts of Lower Assam and some parts of Arunachal Pradesh. Barman Kachari is one of the ancient ethnic groups of North-East India. Since the 2002 Amendment act, many Barman Kacharis in Assam are referred to as 'Barman'. They are mainly found in the districts of Udalguri, Baksa, Chirang, Kokrajhar, Darrang, Kamrup, Goalpara, Nagaon, Lakhimpur, Dhemaji

Demographics[edit | edit source]

The Barman Kacharis number some 24,237 persons, according to a 2017 census. Out of this number, 12,555 are males and 11,503 are females. Their literacy rate is estimated at 4 percent. The level of literacy of males and females is 2.5% and 1.5%, respectively.

Documentation[edit | edit source]

The script of Barman Thar

The language of the Barman Kacharis had never been documented until 2019 when M.A. students in Linguistics and Language Technology (Batch 2018-2020) of Tezpur University carried out field work for the first time on this language.[1]

Phonology[edit | edit source]

The Barman Thar phonemic inventory consists of eight vowels, nine diphthongs, and twenty consonants (including two semivowels).[1]

Consonants[edit | edit source]

In Barman Thar, there are twenty consonants.

Bilabial Labio-velar Alveolar Palatal Velar Glottal
Plosive p b t d c k ɡ
Aspirated plosive ph th kh
Nasal m n ŋ
Flap ɾ
Fricative s z h
Approximant w j
Lateral approximant l

and z have idiolectal variations. They are, by some people, sometimes pronounced as ɸ and d͡z respectively. For example, the word pʰa (meaning “father”) is sometimes pronounced as ɸa and nɐmza (meaning “bad”) is sometimes pronounced as nɐmd͡za.[citation needed]

Gemination[edit | edit source]

Gemination, which is the twinning of two consonants, is also found in the Barman language.

Phonemes Example (Barman) English gloss
p+p tʰɐppɐɾa “ash”
t+tʰ mɐttʰai “big”
d+d ɡɛddɛl “new”
c+c bicci “egg”
k+k nukkuruŋ “eye”
k+kʰ bɛkkʰuma “dull”
m+m dummua “fever”
n+n cunna “cloth”
l+l mulluk “earth”

Consonant clusters[edit | edit source]

In the study of Barman Thar, carried out by the students of Tezpur University, they found only one word, i.e. bɾui, with a consonant cluster. It is a cluster of two consonants, b and ɾ. And they found no final cluster in any word.

Vowels[edit | edit source]

In Barman Thar, there are eight vowels and nine diphthongs.

Monophthongs[edit | edit source]

Front Central Back
High i u
Close-mid e o
Open-mid ɛ ɔ
Near-open ɐ
Open a

Diphthongs[edit | edit source]

i u a
i ia
o oi ou
ɐ ɐi
e ei
u ui ua
a ai au

Morphology and grammar[edit | edit source]

Case:[1]

Case Marker Examples
1. (a) Nominative

(b) Ergative

(a) ∅

(b) a

2. Accusative Template:Interlinear
3. (a) Instrumental

(b) Comitative

ca

nɛ nɔɡɛ

Genitive Template:Interlinear
Locative ou Template:Interlinear
6. (a) Intentive dative

(b) Destinational dative

nɛ nɛɡa

ca

7. Ablative nɛ tukki Template:Interlinear

Tense and aspect[edit | edit source]

Three of the tenses are morphologically marked in Barman Thar.

Present: Template:Interlinear
Past: Template:Interlinear
Future: Template:Interlinear

In Barman Thar, the present tense is marked with the suffix “-a”, the past tense, with “-ja” and the future tense, with “-ɡɐn”. And the following are the four aspects:

Present perfect: Template:Interlinear
Present continuous: Template:Interlinear
Past perfect: Template:Interlinear
Future continuous: Template:Interlinear
Pronouns
Singular Plural
1st ɐŋa ciŋa
2nd nɐŋ nɐtɐŋ
honorific nɐtɐŋ nɐŋɐtɐŋ
3rd owa otɐŋ
honorific otɐŋ

Negation[edit | edit source]

In Barman Thar, verbs are negated by suffixing “-za” and “-zia” for present and past tense respectively.

For example, the root word for the verb “eat” in Barman Thar is “ca”. The negative form of the word in the present tense is caza (ca+za), meaning “do/does not eat” and that in the past tense is cazia (ca+zia), meaning “did not eat”.

Again, in case of imperative sentences, the suffix -nɔŋ is use.

For example, mei canɔŋ means “Don't eat rice.” [mei means “rice”, and canɔŋ is bi-morphemic, formed by the root word for “eat”, i.e. ca, and the imperative negative marker -nɔŋ.]

Classifiers[edit | edit source]

In Barman Thar, there is one classifier, i.e. -ja.

Template:Interlinear

Allomorphs[edit | edit source]

Another feature of this language that needs to be mentioned is the presence of allomorphs.

Allomorphs of the past tense marker:

-ja is the past tense marker. But when this morpheme is suffixed to a verb ending in [m], it becomes -maja. For example, cum + -ja = cummaja. When it is suffixed to a verb ending in [n], it becomes -naja as in dɛn + -ja = dɛnnaja. When it is affixed to a verb ending in [ŋ], it becomes -aja, as in hiŋaja (hiŋ + -ja).

Therefore, it can be said that -maja, -naja and -aja are allomorphs of the morpheme -ja.

Allomorphs of the ergative case marker:

-a is the ergative case marker in Barman Thar. However, when it is affixed to a noun ending in a vowel, it becomes -ja. For example, sita + -ja = sitaja.

So, -ja is an allomorph of the ergative case marker -a.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 A brief linguistic sketch of the Barman Thar (Language). Tezpur University.
  2. Tiwari; Sarma (2013). "A historical and etymological study of the Dimasa Kacharis of Dima Hasao District, Assam, India". The Clarion. 2–2: 144. ISSN 2277-1697. S2CID 55429765.

Bibliography[edit | edit source]

  • DeLancey, Scott (2012). Hyslop, Gwendolyn; Morey, Stephen; W. Post, Mark (eds.). "On the Origin of Bodo-Garo". Northeast Indian Linguistics. 4: 3–20. doi:10.1017/UPO9789382264521.003. ISBN 9789382264521.
  • Joseph, U. V., and Burling, Robbins. 2006. Comparative phonology of the Boro Garo languages. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages Publication.
  • Burling, Robbins (2003). "The Tibeto-Burman languages of northeast India". In Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.). The Sino-Tibetan languages. London: Routledge. pp. 169–191. ISBN 978-0-7007-1129-1.
  • van Driem, George (2001). Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-12062-4.
  • Wood, Daniel Cody (2008). An Initial Reconstruction of Proto-Boro-Garo (MA thesis). University of Oregon. hdl:1794/9485.

Template:Sal languages