Bharatiya Janata Party: Difference between revisions
(Update Formation and early days) |
Adarshatva (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Indian political party}} | |||
{{Redirect|BJP}} | |||
{{Good article}} | |||
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2021}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} | |||
{{Infobox Indian political party | {{Infobox Indian political party | ||
| party_name = Bharatiya Janata Party | | party_name = Bharatiya Janata Party | ||
| logo = | |native_name = भारतीय जनता पार्टी | ||
| abbreviation = BJP | | logo = Bharatiya Janata Party logo.svg | ||
| colorcode = {{Bharatiya Janata Party | | abbreviation = * BJP [in English] <br /> | ||
| president = [[Jagat Prakash Nadda]] | * भाजपा or भा॰ज॰पा॰ [in [[Hindi]]] | ||
| | | colorcode = {{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | ||
| | | president = [[J. P. Nadda]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Jagat Prakash Nadda: BJP's new national president rises through the ranks, faces several challenges |url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/jagat-prakash-nadda-bjps-new-national-president-rises-through-the-ranks-faces-several-challenges-2258301.html |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=Zee News |date=20 January 2020 |author=Ananya Das |archive-date=28 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152910/https://zeenews.india.com/india/jagat-prakash-nadda-bjps-new-national-president-rises-through-the-ranks-faces-several-challenges-2258301.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
| | | national_convener = <--Bharatiya Janata Party does not have any National Convener.--> | ||
| foundation = {{ | | general_secretary = [[B. L. Santhosh]]<br />Shiv Prakash<ref>{{cite news |title=Meet BL Santhosh, newly appointed general secretary of BJP |url=https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=live mint |date=15 July 2019 |author=Gyan Varma |archive-date=28 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152911/https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/meet-bl-santhosh-newly-appointed-general-secretary-of-bjp-1563168633822.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
| founder = {{ | | treasurer = [[Rajesh Agarwal]]<ref>{{Cite news|date=27 September 2020|title=Rajesh Agarwal gets BJP treasurer post|work=United News of India|url=http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|access-date=12 October 2020|archive-date=17 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017113913/http://www.uniindia.com/rajesh-agarwal-gets-bjp-treasurer-post/north/news/2178686.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| presidium = [[National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive]]<ref name=Constitution>{{cite web |title=Bharatiya Janata Party Constitution |url=https://www.bjp.org/en/constitution|website=BJP official website |publisher=Bharatiya Janata Party |access-date=15 May 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171118173055/http://www.bjp.org/images/pdf_2012_h/constitution_eng_jan_10_2013.pdf |archive-date=18 November 2017 }}</ref> | |||
| ppchairman = [[Narendra Modi]]<br /> ([[Prime Minister of India|Prime Minister]]) | |||
| headquarters = 6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, <br />[[New Delhi]]- | | loksabha_leader = [[Narendra Modi]]<br /> ([[Leader of the House in Lok Sabha]])<ref name=":3000">{{cite news |title=BJP announces new parliamentary committee; Modi leader in Lok Sabha, Rajnath his deputy |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12 |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=India Today |date=12 June 2019 |archive-date=6 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141325/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-announces-parliamentary-party-executive-committee-1547512-2019-06-12 |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
| rajyasabha_leader = [[Piyush Goyal]]<br /> ([[Leader of the House in Rajya Sabha]]) | |||
| foundation = {{Start date and age|df=yes|p=y|1980|04|06}}<ref name=":4000">{{cite news |title=BJP's foundation day: Brief history of the achievements and failures of the party |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/ |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=The Indian Express |date=6 April 2019 |archive-date=11 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190511143721/https://indianexpress.com/article/research/bhartiya-janata-party-narendra-modi-bjp-bjps-37th-foundation-day-brief-history-of-the-achievements-and-failures-of-the-party-4601637/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| founder = {{ublist | [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] | [[L. K. Advani]]<ref name=":3001">{{cite news |title=What you need to know about India's BJP |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html |access-date=16 March 2020 |work=AlJazeera |date=23 May 2019 |archive-date=13 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513075856/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/india-bjp-190523053850803.html |url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
| headquarters = 6-A, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, <br />[[New Delhi]], [[Delhi]], [[India]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|title=BJP Gets A New Address; Soul Of New Office Is The Party Worker, Says PM Modi|website=NDTV.com|access-date=16 March 2020|archive-date=6 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141326/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-gets-a-new-address-today-pm-modi-to-inaugurate-multi-storey-office-1814043|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| eci = [[List of political parties in India#National parties|National Party]]{{sfn|Election Commission|2013}} | | eci = [[List of political parties in India#National parties|National Party]]{{sfn|Election Commission|2013}} | ||
| alliance = | | alliance = [[National Democratic Alliance]]<br />([[India|All India]])<ref name="bjp0right">{{cite news |title=BJP + 29 Parties = National Democratic Alliance |url=https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972 |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=NDTV |date=20 May 2014 |author=Devesh Kumar |archive-date=6 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406141401/https://www.ndtv.com/elections-news/bjp-29-parties-national-democratic-alliance-562972 |url-status=live }}</ref><br /> | ||
[[North-East Democratic Alliance]]<br />([[Northeast India]])<ref>{{cite news |title=BJP seals alliances in Northeast, aims 22 LS seats |url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=The Hindu Business Line |date=13 March 2019 |archive-date=17 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317165853/https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/bjp-seals-alliances-in-northeast-aims-22-ls-seats/article26519732.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| loksabha_seats = {{Composition bar| | | loksabha_seats = {{Composition bar|301|543|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''543''' MPs & '''0''' Vacant)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|title=Party Position pdf|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317173437/http://loksabhaph.nic.in/writereaddata/Updates/EventLSS_637191127420791113_31994.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
| rajyasabha_seats = {{Composition bar| | | rajyasabha_seats = {{Composition bar|93|245|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''237''' MPs & '''8''' Vacant)<ref>{{cite web|title = Alphabetical Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|url = https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|access-date = 22 September 2019|archive-date = 4 June 2019|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190604121829/https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/member_site/partymemberlist.aspx|url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|title=Strengthwise Party Position in the Rajya Sabha|publisher=Rajya Sabha|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170606134311/http://164.100.47.5/NewMembers/partystrength.aspx|archive-date=6 June 2017}}</ref><!-- Please do not change without a more up-to-date reference --><!-- Seats after Rajya Sabha election, 2020 --> | ||
| state_seats_name = | | state_seats_name = [[State Legislative Assembly (India)|State Legislative Assemblies]] | ||
[[ | | state_seats = {{Composition bar|1363|4036|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | ||
| state_seats | ('''4025''' MLAs & | ||
{{Composition bar| | '''11''' Vacant) | ||
| state2_seats_name= | ([[#Current seats in State Legislative Assemblies|see complete list]]) | ||
[[ | | state2_seats_name = [[State Legislative Council (India)|State Legislative Councils]] | ||
| state2_seats = | | state2_seats = {{Composition bar|165|426|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | ||
{{Composition bar| | ('''403''' MLCs & '''23''' Vacant) | ||
| no_states = {{Composition bar| | ([[#Current seats in State Legislative councils|see complete list]]) | ||
| ideology = {{ | | no_states = {{Composition bar|15|31|hex={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} ('''28''' States and '''3''' UTs)<ref>{{cite news|title=BJP gains back Madhya Pradesh in just 15 months after losing it|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|work=India Today|date=26 November 2019|access-date=23 March 2020|archive-date=19 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211119202332/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bjp-s-shivraj-singh-chouhan-sworn-in-as-madhya-pradesh-cm-for-fourth-time-1658867-2020-03-23|url-status=live}}</ref><br /> | ||
* [[Hindutva]]<ref>{{cite news|title=BJP | | ideology = {{ubl|class=nowrap| | ||
|[[Conservatism]] ([[Conservatism in India|Indian]])<ref name="mathewjoh">* {{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=Matthew |last2=Garnett |first2=Mark |last3=Walker |first3=David M |date=2017 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |title=Conservatism and Ideology |publisher=[[Routledge]] |pages=45–50 |isbn=978-1-317-52900-2 |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061245/https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |url-status=live }} | |||
* Björn Goldstein (2015) The unconscious Indianization of 'Western' conservatism – is Indian conservatism a universal model?, Global Discourse, 5:1, 44-65, {{doi|10.1080/23269995.2014.946315}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Mazumdar |first1=Surajit |date=2017 |title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India |url=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93182 |publisher=[[Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich]] |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=115–131 |doi= |access-date=24 April 2022 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061248/https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93182/ |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|last1=Chhibber|first1=Pradeep. K.|last2=Verma|first2=Rahul|isbn=978-0-190-62390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|pages=50–150|year=2018|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|[[Hindu nationalism]]<ref> | |||
* Henrik Berglund. "Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP." [[Economic and Political Weekly]] 39, no. 10 (2004): 1064–70. {{JSTOR|4414737}}. | |||
* Chhibber, Pradeep K. "State Policy, Party Politics, and the Rise of the BJP." In Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India, 159–76. [[University of Michigan Press]], 1999. {{JSTOR|10.3998/mpub.23136.12}}.</ref> | |||
|[[Hindutva]]<ref name="Angana.p">* {{cite book |last1=Chatterji |first1=Angana P. |last2=Hansen |first2=Thomas Blom |last3=Jaffrelot |first3=Christophe |date=2019 |title=Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |pages=100–130 |isbn=978-0-19-007817-1 |author-link1=Angana P. Chatterji |author-link2=Thomas Blom Hansen |author-link3=Christophe Jaffrelot |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://books.google.com/books?id=zcObDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP%27s+Hindutva+ideology |url-status=live }} | |||
* [[Christophe Jaffrelot|Jaffrelot, Christophe]], and Cynthia Schoch. "Conclusion to Part I." In Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, 148–54. [[Princeton University Press]], 2021. {{doi|10.2307/j.ctv1dc9jzx.12}}. | |||
* {{cite book|title=Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India|author=Chhibber, Pradeep K. and Verma, Rahul|isbn=978-0-190-62390-6|lccn=2018001733|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|year=2018|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|access-date=2 May 2022|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061225/https://books.google.com/books?id=nJRqDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|[[Neoliberalism]]<ref name="Surajit 2017">* {{Cite book|last=Mazumdar|first=Surajit|title=Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India|publisher=University Library of Munich|year=2017|location=Germany}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Gopalakrishnan |first1=Shankar |title=Defining, Constructing and Policing a 'New India': Relationship between Neoliberalism and Hindutva |journal=Economic & Political Weekly |date=7 July 2006 |volume=41 |issue=26 |pages=2803–2813 |jstor=4418408 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408 |access-date=26 September 2020 |archive-date=17 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201017234207/https://www.jstor.org/stable/4418408 |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Wilson |first1=Kalpana |last2=Ung Loh |first2=Jennifer |last3=Purewal |first3=Navtej |title=Gender, Violence and the Neoliberal State in India |journal=Feminist Review |date=July 2018 |volume=119 |issue=1 |pages=1–6 |doi=10.1057/s41305-018-0109-8 |s2cid=149814002 |url=https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=10 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201210111943/https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/25540/1/wilson-ung-loh-purewal-introduction-gender-violence-and-the-neoliberal-state-in-India.doc.pdf |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Mathur |first1=Navdeep |title=The low politics of higher education: saffron branded neoliberalism and the assault on Indian universities |journal=Critical Policy Studies |date=2018 |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=121–125 |doi=10.1080/19460171.2017.1403343|s2cid=148842457 }}</ref> | |||
|[[Right-wing populism]]<ref> | |||
* {{cite journal|volume=26|issue=3|journal=Democratization|first1=Duncan|last1=McDonnell|year=2019|first2=Luis|last2=Cabrera|title=The right-wing populism of India's Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care)|pages=484–501|doi=10.1080/13510347.2018.1551885|s2cid=149464986}} | |||
* {{cite book|publisher=Koç University|title=Right-wing Populist Governments Rhetorical Framing of Economic Inequality : the Cases of BJP in India and AKP in Turkey|year=2019|first=Ezgi|last=Özçelik}}</ref> | |||
|[[Integral humanism (India)|Integral humanism]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=Matthew |last2=Garnett |first2=Mark |last3=Walker |first3=David M |date=2017 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |title=Conservatism and Ideology |publisher=[[Routledge]] |pages=45–50 |isbn=978-1-317-52900-2 |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061245/https://books.google.com/books?id=smxQDwAAQBAJ&q=BJP+a+conservatism |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
| position = [[Right-wing politics|Right-wing]]{{sfnm|1a1=Malik|1a2=Singh|1y=1992|1pp=318–336|BBC|2012|2a1=Banerjee|2y=2005|2p=3118}} | |||
| publication = ''[[Kamal Sandesh]]'' {{nowrap|([[English language|English]] and [[Hindi]])<ref>{{cite news |title=PM Modi goes cashless, buys lifetime subscription of BJP mouthpiece Kamal Sandesh through cheque |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27 |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=India Today |date=27 January 2017 |author=Siddhartha Rai |archive-date=28 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328080500/https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/pm-modi-bjp-kamal-sandesh-cashless-currency-revamp-957298-2017-01-27 |url-status=live }}</ref>}}<br> | |||
''Kamal Barta'' {{nowrap|([[Bengali language|Bengali]])<ref>{{cite news | url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook | title=Bengal BJP revamps party mouthpiece before 2018 panchayet elections | newspaper=The Economic Times | last1=Sengupta | first1=Tamal | access-date=29 May 2022 | archive-date=14 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061226/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bengal-bjp-revamps-party-mouthpiece-before-2018-panchayet-elections/articleshow/54717459.cms?_oref=cook&from=mdr | url-status=live }}</ref>}} | |||
| students = [[Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad]]<br />(unofficial)<ref>{{cite web|title = Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad is not the students' wing of BJP: Shreehari Borikar|url = https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|access-date = 23 September 2019|archive-date = 28 February 2020|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200228202158/https://www.abvp.org/akhil-bhartiya-vidyarthi-parishad-not-students-wing-bjp-shreehari-borikar|url-status = live}}</ref> | |||
| youth = [[Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha]]<ref>{{cite news |title=BJP youth wing launches its campaign for party's Lok Sabha poll win |url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=Economic Times |date=19 January 2019 |archive-date=8 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201008021552/https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-youth-wing-launches-its-campaign-for-partys-lok-sabha-poll-win/articleshow/67574466.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| women = [[BJP Mahila Morcha]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Quota for women in council of ministers among Mahila Morcha's suggestions for BJP poll manifesto |url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=Economic Times |date=5 April 2019 |archive-date=23 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023222414/https://m.economictimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/quota-for-women-in-council-of-ministers-among-mahila-morchas-suggestions-for-bjp-poll-manifesto/articleshow/68738662.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| farmers = BJP Kisan Morcha<ref name="KisanMorcha">{{cite news|url =https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/|title =सरकार की नीतियों को किसानों तक पहुंचाएगा बीजेपी किसान मोर्चा|website =m.patrika.com|author =Rajkumar|access-date =8 August 2020|archive-date =19 October 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20201019220329/https://m.patrika.com/noida-news/bjp-kisan-morcha-provide-farmers-government-policies-to-the-people-hindi-news-1541257/|url-status =live}}</ref> | |||
| think_tank = Public Policy Research Centre<ref>{{cite web|title=Public Policy Research Centre|url=http://www.pprc.in/|access-date=22 July 2020|archive-date=26 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726220734/http://www.pprc.in/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Thinktank">—{{cite news|url =https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html|title =BJP think tank offers online course in governance; babus to impart lessons|publisher =The New Indian Express|location =New Delhi|date =23 May 2020|website =newindianexpress.com|author =Express News Service|access-date =14 July 2020|archive-date =14 July 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200714094916/https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/may/23/bjp-think-tank-offers-online-course-in-governance-babus-to-impart-lessons-2146940.html|url-status =live}} | |||
* {{cite news|url =https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|title =BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card|publisher =[[The Pioneer (India)|The Pioneer]]|quote =Public Policy Research Center (PPRC), BJP's think tank, on Monday released a comprehensive report on 100 major decisions and initiatives taken by Modi Government in first 100 days.|location =New Delhi|date =10 September 2019|website =dailypioneer.com|access-date =14 July 2020|archive-date =16 July 2020|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20200716135158/https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/bjp-think-tank-releases-modi-govt---s-100-day-report-card.html|url-status =live}}</ref> | |||
| website = {{URL|bjp.org}} | |||
| predecessor = [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]]<br>(1951–1977)<ref name=":4000" /><br>[[Janata Party]]<br>(1977–1980)<ref name=":4000" /> | |||
| split = [[Janata Party]]<ref name=":4000" /> | |||
|labour = [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Need to Know BJP-led BMS is biggest labour union in India |url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html |access-date=17 March 2020 |work=live mint |date=15 January 2008 |author=Pragya Singh |archive-date=3 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181103131425/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/ohkSVkDnWYnxvZyuzggTsL/Need-to-Know--BJPled-BMS-is-biggest-labour-union-in-India.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| international = [[International Democrat Union]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties|title=India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties — The Diplomat|first=Akhilesh|last=Pillalamarri|work=The Diplomat|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160228053454/https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/indias-bharatiya-janata-party-joins-union-of-international-conservative-parties/|archive-date=28 February 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title = Members|url = https://www.idu.org/members/|publisher = [[International Democrat Union]]|access-date = 25 September 2019|website = idu.org|archive-date = 23 April 2018|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180423165945/https://www.idu.org/members/|url-status = live}}</ref><br />[[Asia Pacific Democrat Union]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|title=International Democrat Union » Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU)|work=International Democrat Union|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170616235358/http://idu.org/asia-pacific-democrat-union-apdu/|archive-date=16 June 2017|access-date=12 June 2017}}</ref> | |||
| colours = {{colour box|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} [[Saffron (color)|Saffron]]<ref>{{cite web|last=Iwanek|first=Krzysztof|date=10 September 2018|title=Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties|url=https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|access-date=5 July 2021|publisher=[[The Diplomat]]|language=en-US|archive-date=23 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210623014149/https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/paint-it-saffron-the-colors-of-indian-political-parties/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| symbol = Lotus<br />[[File:Lotos flower symbol.svg|100px]] | |||
| flag =BJP flag.svg | |||
|leader=|Political position=[[Right-wing politics|Right wing]]<ref | |||
name="bjp0right" /> to [[Far-right politics|far-right]]<ref>{{cite news | |||
|title=Facebook accused of boosting far-right BJP in Indian elections | |||
|url=https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/facebook-accused-of-boosting-far-right-bjp-in-indian-elections/ | |||
|access-date=9 April 2022 | |||
|work=People's World | |||
|date=17 March 2022 | |||
|archive-date=6 April 2022 | |||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220406211420/https://peoplesworld.org/article/facebook-accused-of-boosting-far-right-bjp-in-indian-elections/ | |||
|url-status=live | |||
}}</ref>|peasants=[[Bharatiya Kisan Sangh]]<ref>{{cite book|last=Gupta|first=Sejuta Das|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mQiKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA172|pages=172–173|title=Class, Politics, and Agricultural Policies in Post-liberalisation India|isbn=978-1-108-41628-3|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|year=2019e|access-date=3 May 2021|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061257/https://books.google.com/books?id=mQiKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA172|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
{{Bharatiya Janata Party sidebar}} | |||
{{Contains special characters|Indic}} | |||
The '''Bharatiya Janata Party''' ('''BJP'''; {{translation|Indian People's Party}}) is a political party in [[India]], and one of the two major [[List of political parties in India|Indian political parties]] alongside the [[Indian National Congress]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|title=In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress|work=The Times of India|date=19 May 2016|access-date=29 June 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171105170102/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms|archive-date=5 November 2017}}</ref> Since 2014, it has been the [[List of ruling political parties by country|ruling political party in India]] under [[Narendra Modi]], the incumbent [[Prime Minister of India|Indian prime minister]].<ref name=":0">{{cite news|date=25 May 2019|title=Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303|work=Zee News|url=https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806|access-date=30 March 2020|archive-date=2 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190602032641/https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806|url-status=live}}</ref> The BJP is aligned with [[right-wing politics]], and its policies adhere to [[Hindutva]], a [[Hindu nationalist]] ideology.{{sfn|Banerjee|2005|p=3118}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|p=318}} It has close ideological and organisational links to the [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh]] (RSS).<ref>{{cite news|date=17 March 2019|title=Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch|work=Business Standard|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|access-date=18 March 2020|archive-date=28 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328152912/https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html|url-status=live}}</ref> {{As of|2023|3}}, it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the [[Parliament of India]] as well as [[State legislature (India)|state legislatures]]. | |||
The party's origins lie in the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]], which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician [[Syama Prasad Mukherjee|Shyama Prasad Mukherjee]].{{sfn|Swain|2001|p=60}} After [[The Emergency (India)|The Emergency]] of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the [[Janata Party]]; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the [[1977 Indian general election|1977 general election]]. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the [[1984 Indian general election|1984 general election]], it grew in strength on the back of the movement around [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] in [[Uttar Pradesh]]. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]], lasted for only 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} | |||
After the [[1998 Indian general election|1998 general election]], the BJP-led coalition known as the [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the [[2004 Indian general election|2004 general election]], the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the [[List of chief ministers of Gujarat|chief minister of Gujarat]], led the party to a landslide victory in the [[2014 Indian general election|2014 general election]]. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected in the [[2019 Indian general election|2019 general election]]. {{As of|2023|06}}, the alliance governs 15 Indian states and union territories. | |||
The official ideology of the BJP is [[Integral humanism (India)|integral humanism]], first formulated by [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]] in 1965. The party advocates [[social conservatism]] and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindu-nationalist priorities, and focused on a largely [[Economic liberalisation in India|liberal economic policy]] that prioritised [[Globalization in India|globalisation]] and [[Economy of India|economic growth]] over [[Social security in India|social welfare]].{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} Since returning to government in 2014, the BJP government has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of [[Triple talaq in India|triple talaq]], and revoking [[Article 370]] of the Indian constitution, which granted autonomy to [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]], and also [[The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019|abrogating its statehood]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650">{{cite journal | last1=Bhatty | first1=Kiran | last2=Sundar | first2=Nandini | title=Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime | journal=International Sociology | publisher=SAGE Publications | volume=35 | issue=6 | date=17 September 2020 | issn=0268-5809 | doi=10.1177/0268580920937226 | pages=632–650| s2cid=224896271 }}</ref> India has experienced nationwide [[Democratic backsliding by country#India|democratic backsliding]] under the [[Premiership of Narendra Modi|BJP's rule since 2014]].<ref name="auto2">{{cite web|url=https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf|last1=Hindle|first1=Garry|last2=Lindberg|first2=Staffan|publisher=V-Dem Institute|date=2020|title=New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party|access-date=9 October 2021|archive-date=24 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024234004/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="auto1">Nazifa Alizada, Rowan Cole, Lisa Gastaldi, Sandra Grahn, Sebastian Hellmeier, Palina Kolvani, Jean Lachapelle, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Shreeya Pillai, and Staffan I. Lindberg. 2021. Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210914030243/https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf |date=14 September 2021 }}</ref> | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
=== Predecessors === | |||
==== Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77) ==== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| header = Influential figures | |||
| width = 220 | |||
| image1 = Shyama_Prasad_Mukherjee_portrait_in_Parliament.jpg | |||
| caption1 = [[Syama Prasad Mookerjee]], founder of the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]] | |||
| image2 = Atal Bihari Vajpayee tribute image (cropped).jpg | |||
| caption2 = [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]], the first BJP [[Prime Minister of India|prime minister]] (1998–2004) | |||
| image3 = Lkadvani.jpg | |||
| caption3 = [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]], [[Deputy Prime Minister of India|deputy Prime Minister]] under Vajpayee and one of the architects of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement | |||
}} | |||
{{Main|Bharatiya Jana Sangh}} | |||
The BJP's origins lie in the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]], popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by [[Syama Prasad Mukherjee]] in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant [[Indian National Congress|Congress party]]. It was founded in collaboration with the [[Hindu nationalist]] volunteer organisation, the [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh]] (RSS), and was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS.{{sfn|Noorani|1978|p=216}} The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of [[Pakistan]] by the [[Indian National Congress|Congress party]] and then-Prime Minister [[Jawaharlal Nehru]]. The RSS loaned several of its leading ''[[pracharak]]s'', or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]], who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three [[Lok Sabha]] seats in the [[1952 Indian general election|first general elections in 1952]]. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=116–119}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}} | |||
The | The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] into India.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=250}} [[Mauli Chandra Sharma]] was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of [[Integral humanism (India)|integral humanism]], which formed the official doctrine of the party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=122–126, 129–130}} Younger leaders, such as [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] and [[L. K. Advani|Lal Krishna Advani]] also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a [[Uniform civil code of India|uniform civil code]], banning [[cow slaughter]] and abolishing the [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|special status given to Jammu and Kashmir]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=250, 352, 413}} | ||
After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the [[Swatantra Party]] and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the [[Hindi heartland]], including [[Madhya Pradesh]], [[Bihar]] and [[Uttar Pradesh]]. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=427–428}} | |||
==== | ==== Janata Party (1977–80) ==== | ||
{{Main|Janata Party}} | |||
In 1975, Prime Minister [[Indira Gandhi]] imposed a [[The Emergency (India)|state of emergency]]. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the [[Socialist Party (India)|Socialist Party]], the [[Congress (O)]] and the [[Bharatiya Lok Dal]] to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=136}} The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with [[Morarji Desai]] as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. [[Atal Behari Vajpayee|Vajpayee]], previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the [[Minister of External Affairs (India)|Minister of External Affairs]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}} | |||
The | The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist [[Christophe Jaffrelot]] wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=282–283}} The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=292–301, 312}} [[Communal violence in India|Violence between Hindus and Muslims]] increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in [[Aligarh]] and [[Jamshedpur]] in 1978–79. The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the Jana Sangh should break from the RSS, which the Jana Sangh refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the [[Janata Party (Secular)]]. The [[Premiership of Morarji Desai|Morarji Desai government]] was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing its resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|1996|pp=301–312}}{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=538–540}} | ||
=== BJP (1980–present) === | |||
==== Formation and early days ==== | |||
Although the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president.<ref>{{cite web|date=7 April 2020|orig-year=7 April 1980|title=Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/|access-date=12 April 2021|website=The Indian Express|language=en|archive-date=12 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412160225/https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/|url-status=live}}</ref> Historian [[Ramachandra Guha]] writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the [[Hindu nationalist]] stance of its predecessor the Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of [[Gandhian Socialism]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} This was unsuccessful, as it won only two [[Lok Sabha]] seats in the [[1984 Indian general election|elections of 1984]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} The [[assassination of Indira Gandhi]] a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the [[Indian National Congress|Congress]] which won a record tally of 403 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=579}} | |||
==== | ==== Ram Janmabhoomi movement ==== | ||
{{Main|Ram Rath Yatra}} | |||
{{Further|Ayodhya dispute|Demolition of the Babri Masjid}} | |||
[[File:Advani Yatra 1990.svg|thumb|[[Ram Rath Yatra]]]] | |||
The failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindu nationalism.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Pai|1996|pp=1170–1183}} In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] movement. In the early 1980s, the [[Vishwa Hindu Parishad]] (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a [[Ram Temple, Ayodhya|temple]] dedicated to the Hindu deity [[Rama]] at the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed site]] of the [[Babri Masjid|Babri Mosque]] in [[Ayodhya]]. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor [[Babur]] in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there.{{sfn|Jha|2003}} The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque.{{sfn|Flint|2005|p=165}} The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 [[Lok Sabha]] seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the [[National Front (India)|National Front]] government of [[V. P. Singh]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=582–598}} | |||
In | In September 1990, Advani began a ''[[rath yatra]]'' (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the ''yatra'' was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim".{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=635}} Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then [[Bihar]] chief minister [[Lalu Prasad Yadav]]. A large number of ''[[kar sevak]]s'' (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several ''kar sevaks''. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh. {{sfn|Guha|2007|p=636}} The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the [[Uttar Pradesh]] assembly.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} | ||
On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the mosque]].{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition.{{sfn|NDTV|2012}}{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}} In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} | |||
=== | A [[Liberhan Commission|2009 report]], authored by Justice [[Manmohan Singh Liberhan]], found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and [[Murli Manohar Joshi]]. The report also criticised [[Kalyan Singh]], Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition.{{sfn|Al Jazeera|2009}} In 2020, the [[Supreme Court of India]] acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.<ref>{{Cite news|date=30 September 2020|title=All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case {{!}} Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece|access-date=12 April 2021|issn=0971-751X|archive-date=12 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412195725/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
==== NDA government (1998, 1999 - 2004) ==== | |||
{{further|National Democratic Alliance}} | |||
A coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the [[Samata Party]], the [[Shiromani Akali Dal]], the [[Shiv Sena]] in addition to the [[All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam]] (AIADMK) and the [[Biju Janata Dal]]. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; [[Amartya Sen]], for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=254}} The NDA had a majority with outside support from the [[Telugu Desam Party]] (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister.{{sfn|rediff.com|1998}} However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, [[Jayalalitha]], withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.{{sfn|Outlook|2013}} | |||
On 13 October 1999, the NDA, without the AIADMK, won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister{{efn|in 2002}} and [[Minister for Home Affairs (India)|Home Minister]]. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror as well as [[neo-liberalism|neo-liberal]] economic policies.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In 2001, [[Bangaru Laxman]], then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in [[Operation West End|a sting operation]].{{sfn|Kattakayam|2012}}{{sfn|India Today|2001}} He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.{{sfn|Tehelka|2001}} | |||
==== 2002 Gujarat violence ==== | |||
{{Main|2002 Gujarat violence}} | |||
On 27 February 2002, a [[Godhra train burning|train carrying Hindu pilgrims was burned]] outside the town of [[Godhra]], killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of [[Gujarat]] that lasted several weeks.{{sfn|Ghassem-Fachandi|2012|pp=1–31}} The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}} Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread.{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|p=16}}{{sfn|Harris|2012}} The then-Gujarat chief minister [[Narendra Modi]] and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties.{{sfn|Krishnan|2012}} In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT. BJP [[Member of the Legislative Assembly (India)|MLA]] [[Maya Kodnani]], who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment;{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2014}}{{sfn|NDTV.com|2012}} she was later acquitted by the [[Gujarat High Court]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20|title=Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence|work=India Today|date=20 April 2018|access-date=6 June 2018|archive-date=29 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200229064652/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20|url-status=live}}</ref> Scholars such as [[Paul Brass]], [[Martha Nussbaum]] and [[Dipankar Gupta]] have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.{{sfn|Brass|2005|pp=385–393}}{{sfn|Gupta|2011|p=252}}{{sfn|Nussbaum|2008|p=2}} | |||
==== General election defeats ==== | |||
Vajpayee called for [[2004 Indian general election|early elections in 2004]], six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "[[India Shining]]", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}} However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the [[Lok Sabha]], compared to the 222 of the Congress and its allies. [[Manmohan Singh]] succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the [[United Progressive Alliance]]. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2004}} | |||
In May 2008, the BJP won the [[2008 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election|state elections in Karnataka]]. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any [[South India]]n state. In the [[2009 Indian general election|2009 general elections]], its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. It lost the [[2013 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election|Karnataka assembly election]] in 2013.{{sfn|Hindustan Times|2009}} | |||
==== NDA government (2014–present) ==== | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| header = | |||
| width = 220 | |||
| image1 = PM Modi 2015.jpg | |||
| caption1 = [[Narendra Modi]], Prime Minister of India since 2014 | |||
| image2 = The Union Home Minister, Shri Amit Shah, in New Delhi on August 19, 2019 (cropped).jpg | |||
| caption2 = [[Amit Shah]] has been the longest (continuous) served [[List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National President]] of the BJP | |||
}} | |||
In the [[2014 Indian general election]], the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha.{{sfn|Mathew|2014}} Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th [[Prime Minister of India]] on 26 May 2014.{{sfn|Deccan Chronicle|2014}}{{sfn|BBC|May|2014}} The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament{{sfn|Times of India|2014}} and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its own strength. Support was concentrated in the [[Hindi Belt|Hindi-speaking belt]] in North-central India.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} | |||
Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term.{{sfn|Diwakar|2014}} The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and [[Dalit]] people, as well as among [[Other Backward Class]]es.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP.{{sfn|Varshney|2014}}{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} The BJP was also very successful at mobilising its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.{{sfn|Sridharan|2014}} | |||
In 2019, the BJP won the general election with a majority. Soon after coming to power, on 5 August 2019, the [[Second Modi ministry|Modi administration]] revoked the special status, or [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India#Autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir: Structure and limitations|limited autonomy]], granted under [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|Article 370]] of the [[Constitution of India|Indian Constitution]] to [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]]—a region administered by [[India]] as a state and this states consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of dispute among India, [[Pakistan]], and [[China]] since 1947.<ref name="britannica-jammu-kashmir">{{cite encyclopedia|last1=Akhtar|first1=Rais|last2=Kirk|first2=William|title=Jammu and Kashmir, State, India|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir|access-date=7 August 2019|url-access=subscription|quote=Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947.|archive-date=20 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820091609/https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Jan·OsmanczykOsmańczyk2003">{{cite book|last=Osmańczyk|first=Edmund Jan|author-link=Edmund Osmańczyk|editor-last=Mango|editor-first=Anthony|title=Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements|volume=2: G–M|chapter=Jammu and Kashmir.|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189|year=2003|edition=3rd|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0-415-93922-5|page=1189|quote=Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China.|access-date=16 June 2020|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061302/https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Later in 2019, the [[Second Modi ministry|Modi government]] introduced the [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019]], which was passed by the [[Parliament of India]] on 11 December 2019. It amended the [[Indian nationality law|Citizenship Act, 1955]] by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of [[Hindus|Hindu]], [[Sikhs|Sikh]], [[Buddhist]], [[Jain]], [[Parsis|Parsi]], or [[Christians|Christian]] religion, who had [[Religious discrimination in Pakistan|fled persecution]] from [[Pakistan]], [[Bangladesh]] and [[Afghanistan]] before December 2014.<ref name="BBC explained">[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-50670393 Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212192621/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50670393 |date=12 December 2019 }}, BBC News, 11 December 2019.</ref><ref name="PIBPassesBill">{{cite web |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=195783 |title=Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019 |website=pib.gov.in |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-date=16 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191216092712/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx%3Frelid%3D195783 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Muslim]]s from those countries were not given such eligibility.<ref name="Washington Post" /> The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under [[Indian law]].<ref name="Washington Post">{{cite news |last1=Slater |first1=Joanna |title=Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=18 December 2019 |access-date=18 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191218215158/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html |archive-date=18 December 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|{{harvp|Sharma|2019|p=523}}: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Sen|2018|pp=10–11}}: "Nehru's response [to Patel's warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."}}{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=34–35}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} A report by the [[V-Dem Institute]] described India as experiencing [[democratic backsliding]] during the [[Premiership of Narendra Modi|Modi-led BJP's rule]].<ref name="auto2"/><ref name="auto1"/>, which is often considered a notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian [[The Emergency (India)| Emergency]] years (1975-77).<ref>{{cite web |title=Interview with Indira Gandhi |url=https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |website=Interview relecast through India times |date=18 December 2016 |publisher=TV Eye |access-date=14 June 2018 |archive-date=11 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811131347/https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=29 June 2015 |title=Recalling the Emergency years |work=The Indian Express |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |access-date=14 June 2018 |archive-date=31 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200531210846/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== Ideology and political positions == | |||
=== Social policies and Hindutva === | |||
{{Conservatism sidebar}} | |||
{{Further|Hindutva}} | |||
The official philosophy of the BJP is "[[Integral humanism (India)|Integral humanism]]," a philosophy first formulated by [[Deendayal Upadhyaya]] in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage."{{sfn|Hansen|1999|p=85}}{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} It is committed to [[Hindutva]], an ideology articulated by [[Indian independence movement|Indian independence]] activist [[Vinayak Damodar Savarkar]]. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over [[westernisation]], thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a Hindu nationalist party in a general sense.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}}{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=633–659}}{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} | |||
The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the [[Ram Temple, Ayodhya|Ram Temple]] at the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed site]] of the [[Babri Masjid|Babri Mosque]].{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} However, the [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the mosque]] during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in a backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda.{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the [[National Council of Educational Research and Training]] (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}} Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "[[Saffronisation|saffronise]]" Indian history.{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=63}}{{sfn|International Religious Freedom Report|2005}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2002}}{{sfn|Davies|2005}} The NDA government introduced [[Vedic astrology]] as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.{{sfn|BBC|January|2014}} | |||
Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions.<ref name="Orange Evolution">{{cite news|date=2 March 2019|title=Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|url=https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190301125100/https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul|archive-date=1 March 2019|access-date=27 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2014, [[Yellapragada Sudershan Rao]], who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the [[Indian Council of Historical Research]] (ICHR).<ref name="Ganguly 2014">{{cite journal|last1=Ganguly|first1=Sumit|s2cid=154421269|title=India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead|journal=[[Journal of Democracy]]|date=October 2014|volume=25|issue=4|pages=56–60|doi=10.1353/jod.2014.0077|url=https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d1972096ec288e4b0c58679a16bf66172fdb31e|access-date=30 August 2021|archive-date=14 April 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061306/https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/India's-Watershed-Vote%3A-The-Risks-Ahead-Ganguly/0d1972096ec288e4b0c58679a16bf66172fdb31e|url-status=live}}</ref> Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.<ref name="Ganguly 2014" /><ref name=saffronisation>{{cite news |first=Anita |last=Joshua |title=Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate |work=[[The Hindu]] |date=16 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141202181112/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece |archive-date=2 December 2014 }}</ref><ref name=right_wing>{{cite news |first=Akshaya |last=Mukul |title=Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection |work=[[The Times of India]]|date=18 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140721002055/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms |archive-date=21 July 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars [[Nandini Sundar]] and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650"/> The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasizing the role of [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650"/><ref name="Bhatty 2019">{{cite encyclopedia | last=Bhatty | first = Kiran | title = School education: Denials and delusions| editor-last1 = Azad | editor-first1=Rohit | editor-last2=Chakraborty | editor-first2=Shouvik | editor-last3=Ramani | editor-first3=Srinivasan | editor-last4=Sinha | editor-first4=Dipa | encyclopedia=A quantum leap in the wrong direction? | date=2019 | isbn=978-93-5287-618-1 | oclc=1089418969 }}</ref> | |||
The BJP supports a [[uniform civil code]], which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority.{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}}{{sfn|Seshia|1998|pp=1036–1050}} The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505,|title=Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union|website=pib.gov.in|access-date=31 March 2021|archive-date=10 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310075212/https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505,|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/article-370-rendered-toothless-article-35a-ceases-to-exist/articleshow/70535292.cms Article 370 rendered toothless, Article 35A ceases to exist] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130063447/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/article-370-rendered-toothless-article-35a-ceases-to-exist/articleshow/70535292.cms |date=30 November 2021 }}, The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf|title=The Gazette of India|access-date=6 March 2020|archive-date=5 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190805094806/http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> the abrogation of [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India]], which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its [[Instrument of Accession (Jammu and Kashmir)|accession to the Indian Union]].{{sfn|Malik|Singh|1992|pp=318–336}} It simultaneously [[The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019|abrogated Jammu and Kashmir statehood]], reorganizing it into two [[union territory|union territories]], [[Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)|Jammu and Kashmir]] and [[Ladakh]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650" /> | |||
The BJP opposes [[Illegal immigration in India|illegal immigration into India]] from [[Bangladesh]].{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy and stability of the country.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}} Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful.{{sfn|Gillan|2002|pp=73–95}}{{sfn|Ramachandran|2003}} The party later became the party of government in Assam.<ref>{{cite web|date=17 March 2021|title=Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist|url=https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/|access-date=5 May 2021|website=[[ThePrint]]|language=en-US|archive-date=18 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518010553/https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/|url-status=live}}</ref> The Modi administration passed a [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019|citizenship law]] in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for [[Religious persecution|persecuted religious]] minorities from [[Afghanistan]], [[Bangladesh]] and [[Pakistan]] who are [[Hindus]], [[Sikhs]], [[Buddhists]], [[Jain]]s, [[Parsis]] or [[Christians]].<ref name="BBC explained"/><ref name="PIBPassesBill" /> The law does not grant such eligibility to [[Muslims]].<ref name="CNNExcludes">{{cite news |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |title=India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims |first1=Helen |last1=Regan |first2=Swati |last2=Gupta |first3=Omar |last3=Khan |publisher=CNN |quote=The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries. |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-date=15 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215224043/https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="NPRExcludes">{{cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |title=India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims |publisher=NPR |first1=Sam |last1=Gringlas |access-date=18 March 2023 |archive-date=15 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191215032601/https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Washington Post" /> This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under [[Indian law]]: it attracted global [[criticism]], and sparked widespread [[Citizenship Amendment Act protests|protests]] that were halted by the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref name="Bhatty Sundar pp. 632–650"/><ref name="Washington Post"/>{{efn|{{harvp|Jayal|2019|pp=33–50}}: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."}} Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the [[2020 Delhi riots]], caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.<ref name="guardian-3-16-20-1">{{citation|title=Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots|last1=Ellis-Peterson|first1=Hannah|last2=Azizur Rahman|first2=Shaikh|location=Delhi|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots|date=16 March 2020|access-date=17 March 2020|archive-date=17 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200317023019/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="NYTimes-Analysis-March1">{{citation|last1=Gettleman|first1=Jeffrey|last2=Abi-Habib|first2=Maria|title=In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse|date=1 March 2020|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html|access-date=1 March 2020|archive-date=6 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200306120958/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.<ref name=nytimes-2020-3-12-two-thirds>{{citation|title='If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims|first1=Jeffrey|last1=Gettleman|first2=Sameer|last2=Yasir|first3=Suhasini|last3=Raj|first4=Hari|last4=Kumar|others=Photographs by Loke, Atul|date=12 March 2020|access-date=13 March 2020|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html|archive-date=13 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200313011029/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-6-20-slater-1">{{citation|last1=Slater|first1=Joanna|last2=Masih|first2=Niha|date=6 March 2020|title=In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn|newspaper=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html|access-date=6 March 2020|archive-date=7 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200307070624/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="wapo-3-2-20-slater-1">{{citation|last1=Slater|first1=Joanna|last2=Masih|first2=Niha|date=2 March 2020|title=What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India|newspaper=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html|access-date=15 March 2020|archive-date=3 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200303203132/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=26 February 2020|title=Modi slammed as death toll in New Delhi violence rises|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/02/modi-slammed-death-toll-delhi-violence-rises-200226192504695.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114013040/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/2/26/modi-slammed-as-death-toll-in-new-delhi-violence-rises|archive-date=14 January 2021|access-date=30 November 2020|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Varadarajan|first=Siddharth|date=27 February 2020|title=Narendra Modi's Reckless Politics Brings Mob Rule to New Delhi|work=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]]|url=https://thewire.in/communalism/narendra-modi-delhi-riots-mob-violence-bjp|url-status=live|access-date=19 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112145040/https://thewire.in/communalism/narendra-modi-delhi-riots-mob-violence-bjp|archive-date=12 January 2021}}</ref> | |||
In 2013, the [[Supreme Court of India]] reinstated the controversial [[Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code]], which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics, including Muslim religious leaders, stated that they supported the verdict.{{sfn|Times of India|2013}}{{sfn|Buncombe|2014}} BJP president [[Rajnath Singh]] said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural,{{sfn|Ramaseshan|2013}} though the party softened the stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections.{{sfn|Business Standard|2014}} The Modi government is opposed to [[same-sex marriage]], stating in a legal affidavit that legalizing it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as ‘husband’, a biological woman as ‘wife’ and children born out of union".<ref>{{cite news|work=The Independent|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html|title=Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman'|date=25 February 2021|access-date=17 January 2023|archive-date=17 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117000847/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== Economic policies === | |||
{{Neoliberalism sidebar}} | |||
The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh|Jana Sangh]], it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported ''[[swadeshi]]'' (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a [[protectionist]] export policy. However, it supported internal [[economic liberalisation]], and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards [[globalisation]]. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch:{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its ''swadeshi'' ideology.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}} | |||
The two NDA governments in the period 1998–2004 introduced significant deregulation and privatisation of government-owned enterprises. It also introduced tariff-reducing measures. These reforms built off of the initial economic liberalisation introduced by the P. V. Narasimha Rao-led Congress government in the early 1990s.{{sfn|Tiwari|2012}} India's GDP growth increased substantially during the tenure of the NDA. The 2004 campaign slogan [[India Shining]] was based on the party's belief that the free market would bring prosperity to all sectors of society.{{sfn|Guha|2007|pp=710–720}} After its unexpected defeat, commentators said that it was punished for neglecting the needs of the poor and focusing too much on its corporate allies.{{sfn|Ramesh|2004}}{{sfn|The Hindu|2004}}{{sfn|Sen|2005|p=70}} | |||
This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years.{{sfn|Sheela Bhatt|2014}} Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}}{{sfn|Jaffrelot|2013|pp=79–95}} Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.{{sfn|Bobbio|2012|pp=652–668}} | |||
The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a [[neoliberal]] framework.<ref name="Ruparelia">{{cite journal|last1=Ruparelia|first1=Sanjay|date=12 January 2016|title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=755–775|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|issn=0085-6401|doi-access=free|s2cid=155182560}}</ref><ref name="Shah & Lerche">{{cite journal|last1=Shah|first1=Alpa|last2=Lerche|first2=Jens|url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html|title=India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion|journal=[[Economic & Political Weekly]]|date=10 October 2015|volume=50|issue=41|pages=33–36|access-date=18 March 2023|archive-date=28 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328113150/https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Modi liberalised India's [[foreign direct investment]] policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways.<ref name="Ruparelia" /><ref>{{cite news | url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector | work=[[The Times of India]]| title=Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways | date=7 August 2014 | access-date=27 July 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150807044440/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector | archive-date=7 August 2015 | url-status=live | df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 | work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | first=Raymond | last=Zhong | title=Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough? | date=20 November 2014 | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329123224/http://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 | archive-date=29 March 2016 | access-date=29 March 2016 | df=dmy-all }}</ref> Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them;<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> some of these proposals were dropped after protests.<ref name="ET March 2018">{{cite news |title=Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |access-date=6 February 2019 |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=14 March 2018 |archive-date=9 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209124121/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.<ref name="Shah & Lerche" /> The [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]], a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers.<ref name="Ruparelia" /> Modi has been described as taking a more economically [[populist]] approach on healthcare and agricultural policy.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind|work=[[The Nikkei]]|title=Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind|access-date=20 August 2018|archive-date=20 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180820174144/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind|url-status=live}}</ref> Modi's government has also been described as taking a more [[protectionist]] turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership]] talks<ref>{{cite news|date=15 November 2020|work=[[Times of India]]|title=Why India opted out of world's biggest today|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=14 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114124257/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa|work=[[The Nikkei|Nikkei]]|title=Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa|date=3 December 2020|quote=India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism.|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=3 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210103080258/https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa|url-status=live}}</ref> and introducing the 2020 [[Atmanirbhar Bharat]] economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Financial Times]]|title=Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era|date=23 November 2020|url=https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961 |archive-date=10 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|work=[[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]]|title=India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn|date=19 February 2020|url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=3 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303220412/https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== Defence and counterterrorism === | |||
Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the [[Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002|Prevention of Terrorism Act]], which later came under heavy criticism.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}}{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States [[War on Terror]].{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}} | |||
Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised [[Pokhran-II]], a series of five nuclear tests in 1998.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}} The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.{{sfn|Ganguly|1999|pp=148–177}} | |||
The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying [[Kashmir]] territory, later known as the [[Kargil War]].{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}} Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.{{sfn|Qadir|2002|pp=1–10}}{{sfn|Abbas|2004|p=173}} | |||
After the [[2001 Indian Parliament attack|terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament]] in December 2001, the NDA government passed the [[Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002|Prevention of Terrorism Act]].{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It initially failed to pass in the [[Rajya Sabha]]; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a [[joint session]] of the Parliament, where the numerical superior [[Lok Sabha]] allowed the bill to pass.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon [[civil liberties]], and the [[National Human Rights Commission of India]] stated that it had been used to target Muslims.{{sfn|Krishnan|2004|pp=1–37}} It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.{{sfn|Times of India|2002}} | |||
The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a [[2015 Indian counter-insurgency operation in Myanmar]] against the [[National Socialist Council of Nagaland]], the [[2016 Indian Line of Control strike]] in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the [[2019 Balakot airstrike]] in Pakistan.<ref>{{Cite news|work=[[The Economic Times]]|title=Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar|date=11 July 2018|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms|access-date=25 November 2020|archive-date=18 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118052537/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> It also militarily intervened in defence of [[Bhutan]] during the [[2017 Doklam standoff]] with China.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The Quint]]|title=Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered?|url=https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained|date=14 October 2017|access-date=25 November 2020|archive-date=27 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201027203809/https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms.<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 May 2021 |title=The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military |first1=Anit |last1=Mukherjee |url=https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |access-date=6 November 2022 |website=War on the Rocks |language=en-US |archive-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065208/https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |date=8 April 2019 |access-date=6 November 2022 |newspaper=[[The Financial Express (India)]] |language=en |archive-date=6 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221106065206/https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the [[Chief of Defence Staff (India)|Chief of Defence Staff (CDS)]] to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |date=16 August 2019 |access-date=6 November 2022 |newspaper=[[India Today]] |language=en |archive-date=27 September 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927070751/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15 |url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Department of Military Affairs]] was also established and put under the CDS.<ref>{{Cite news |date=24 December 2019 |title=Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |first1=Rahul |last1=Singh |access-date=6 November 2022 |newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]] |language=en |archive-date=3 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221003170252/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== Foreign policy === | |||
The historical stance of the BJP towards [[foreign policy]], like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on an aggressive [[Hindu nationalism]] combined with economic protectionism.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the [[partition of India]]; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of [[Non-Aligned Movement|non-alignment]], and instead advocated closeness to the United States.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States,<ref>{{cite book|title=US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century|page=155|year=2016|first=Efraim|last=Inbar|publisher=Taylor & Francis}}</ref> while stressing a desire for a more [[Polarity (international relations)|multipolar]] world order.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The Hindu]]|title=Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar|date=19 September 2020|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=24 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124010145/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it.{{sfn|Shulman|2000|pp=365–390}}{{sfn|Harris|2005|pp=7–27}} Its policy also represented a significant change from the [[Jawaharlal Nehru#Foreign policy|Nehruvian idealism]] of previous governments, opting instead for realism.{{sfn|Lall|2006}} His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the [[Delhi–Lahore Bus]] service.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Vajpayee signed the [[Lahore Declaration]], which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the [[Kargil War|1999 Kargil War]]. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the [[Line of Control]] that marked the ''de facto'' border between the two countries.{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak".{{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil [[Agra summit]], preventing any significant deal from being reached. {{sfn|Chaulia|2002|pp=215–234}} | |||
The Vajpayee administration also offered political support to the U.S. War on Terror, in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons.{{sfn|Kux|2002|pp=93–106}} However, the BJP strongly condemned the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]], stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq".<ref>{{cite news|work=Arab News|title=BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War|url=https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278|date=5 April 2003|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=1 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901100757/https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278|url-status=live}}</ref> The BJP also opposed the [[2011 military intervention in Libya]] and urged the [[Lok Sabha]] to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[The Hindu]]|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece|title=Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs|date=23 March 2011|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=1 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901101324/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with [[Nawaz Sharif]]'s government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015.<ref>{{cite news|date=25 December 2015|work=[[BBC]]|title=India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=11 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210211014845/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594|url-status=live}}</ref> Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017.<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Times of India]]|date=18 December 2020|title=PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=22 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201222092117/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy.<ref>{{cite news|work=Scroll.in|title=The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand?|date=26 February 2019|url=https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=10 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310074955/https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared [[2015 Nepal blockade|blockade on Nepal]].<ref>{{cite news|work=[[NDTV]]|title=Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade|date=15 November 2015|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695|access-date=3 January 2021|archive-date=8 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108132725/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695|url-status=live}}</ref> The Modi government expressed concern following the [[2021 Myanmar coup d'état]], but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a [[United Nations Security Council]] resolution regarding the situation there.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta | title=Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta | date=22 November 2021 | last1=Martin | first1=Michael | access-date=30 January 2023 | archive-date=30 January 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192530/https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece | title=India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy | newspaper=The Hindu | date=22 December 2022 | last1=Haidar | first1=Suhasini | access-date=30 January 2023 | archive-date=30 January 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130192526/https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece | url-status=live }}</ref> The Modi government remained neutral on the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]],<ref>{{cite news|work=Livemint|title=Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers|date=10 March 2022|url=https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html|access-date=13 January 2023|archive-date=13 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230113134704/https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html|url-status=live}}</ref> abstaining from [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 2623]], which condemned the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)|ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine]].<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Hindustan Times]]|title=Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China'|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html|date=26 February 2022|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=1 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms | title=Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions | India News – Times of India | website=[[The Times of India]] | date=3 March 2022 | access-date=1 September 2022 | archive-date=1 September 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901102900/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== Organisation and structure == | |||
[[File:Structure of BJP 2020 March.jpg|right|thumb|upright=1.3|A diagram of the [[Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party|structure of the Bharatiya Janata Party]]]] | |||
{{Main|Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
{{Further|List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
The organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the [[List of Presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party|president]] being the highest authority in the party.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.{{sfn|Times of India|2012}} | |||
Below the president is the [[National Executive of the Bharatiya Janata Party|National Executive]], which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
In April 2015, the BJP stated that it had more than 100 million registered members, which would make it the world's largest political party by primary membership.{{sfn|First Post|2015}}<ref>{{citation |title=BJP becomes largest political party in the world |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-becomes-largest-political-party-in-the-world/articleshow/46739025.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=30 March 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161206122859/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-becomes-largest-political-party-in-the-world/articleshow/46739025.cms |archive-date=6 December 2016}}</ref> {{As of|2022|9}}, the party does not have a single Muslim representative in the parliament and state assemblies.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kuchay |first1=Bilal |title=India ruling party has no Muslim MP for the first time in history |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/6/india-ruling-party-has-no-muslim-mp-for-the-first-time-in-history |access-date=2022-09-11 |work=[[Al Jazeera]] |date=2022-07-06 |archive-date=10 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220910192832/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/6/india-ruling-party-has-no-muslim-mp-for-the-first-time-in-history |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Bhatnagar |first1=Gaurav Vivek |title=From July 7, BJP Will Have No Muslim Representatives in Parliament, Assemblies |url=https://thewire.in/government/in-one-months-time-bjp-will-have-no-muslim-representatives-in-parliament-assemblies |access-date=2022-09-11 |work=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]] |date=2022-07-07 |archive-date=10 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220910192839/https://thewire.in/government/in-one-months-time-bjp-will-have-no-muslim-representatives-in-parliament-assemblies |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other [[Sangh Parivar]]-related oragnisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the [[Sangh Parivar]]:{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The [[Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad]] (''All India Students' Union''), the students' wing of the RSS{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The [[Bharatiya Kisan Sangh]] (''Indian Farmer's Union''), the farmers' division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]] (''Indian Labourers Union''), the labour union associated with the RSS{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as: | |||
* The BJP Mahila Morcha (''BJP Women's Front''), its women's division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The [[Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha]] (''Indian People's Youth Front''), its youth wing{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
* The BJP Minority Morcha (''BJP Minority Front''), its minority division{{sfn|Swain|2001|pp=71–104}} | |||
In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members<ref>{{Cite news |title=BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party |url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |language=en-UK |work=Sydney Morning Herald |date=2022-10-16 |accessdate=2023-07-01 |archive-date=1 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701075444/https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |language=en-IN |work=Times of India |date=2022-04-16 |accessdate=2023-07-01 |archive-date=28 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230628205517/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's [[List of largest political parties|largest political parties]].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Narendra Modi's Message to America |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |language=en-US |work=National Review |date=2022-06-23 |accessdate=2023-07-01 |quote="His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or “Indian People’s Party”) is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development." |archive-date=1 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701084716/https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== General election results == | |||
{{See also|Electoral history of the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
The Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two [[Lok Sabha]] seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived.{{sfn|Guha|2007|p=633}} In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions.{{sfn|Sen|2005|pp=251–272}} In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the [[Leader of the Opposition (India)|Opposition]] whenever the party was not in power.{{sfn|National Informatics Centre|2014}}{{efn|For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.}} | |||
{{Clear|left}} | |||
=== Lok Sabha seats === | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Year | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Legislature | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|Party leader | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Seats won | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Change in seats | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Percentage<br />of votes | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Vote swing | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Outcome | |||
! class="unsortable" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Ref. | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[1984 Indian general election|1984]] | |||
| [[8th Lok Sabha]] | |||
| [[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|2|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 2 | |||
| 7.74% | |||
| – | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1984}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[1989 Indian general election|1989]] | |||
| [[9th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|rowspan=2| [[Lal Krishna Advani]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|85|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 83 | |||
| 11.36% | |||
| {{increase}} 3.62% | |||
| {{partial|[[Confidence and supply|Outside support]] for [[National Front (India)|NF]]}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1989}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[1991 Indian general election|1991]] | |||
| [[10th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|120|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 35 | |||
| 20.11% | |||
| {{increase}} 8.75% | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1991}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[1996 Indian general election|1996]] | |||
| [[11th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|rowspan=4|[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|161|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 41 | |||
| 20.29% | |||
| {{increase}} 0.18% | |||
| {{partial|Government, later opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1996}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[1998 Indian general election|1998]] | |||
| [[12th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 21 | |||
| 25.59% | |||
| {{increase}} 5.30% | |||
| {{yes2|Government}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1998}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[1999 Indian general election|1999]] | |||
| [[13th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|182|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{steady}} | |||
| 23.75% | |||
| {{decrease}} 1.84% | |||
| {{yes2|Government}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|1999}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[2004 Indian general election|2004]] | |||
| [[14th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|138|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{decrease}} 44 | |||
| 22.16% | |||
| {{decrease}} 1.69% | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2004}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[2009 Indian general election|2009]] | |||
| [[15th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|[[Lal Krishna Advani]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|116|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{decrease}} 22 | |||
| 18.80% | |||
| {{decrease}} 3.36% | |||
| {{no2|Opposition}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2009}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[2014 Indian general election|2014]] | |||
| [[16th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|rowspan=2|[[Narendra Modi]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|282|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 166 | |||
| 31.34% | |||
| {{increase}} 12.54% | |||
| {{yes2|Government}} | |||
|{{sfn|Election Commission|2014}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center;" | |||
| [[2019 Indian general election|2019]] | |||
| [[17th Lok Sabha]] | |||
|{{Composition bar|303|543|{{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}}}} | |||
| {{increase}} 21 | |||
| 37.46% | |||
|{{increase}} 6.12% | |||
| {{yes2|Government}} | |||
|<ref>{{Cite news|last=Kumar|first=Sanjay|date=28 May 2019|title=BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers|work=[[The Economic Times]]|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms|url-status=live|access-date=14 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203005824/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms|archive-date=3 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=20. Performance of National Parties|url=https://eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/|access-date=21 December 2020|website=Election Commission of India|archive-date=7 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107073533/https://eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|} | |||
{{as of|2023|05}}, 10 states have [[Chief minister (India)|Chief Ministers]] from the BJP, and governments led by that party, sometimes including allied parties. The 10 states are [[Arunachal Pradesh]], [[Assam]] (with [[Asom Gana Parishad]] and [[United People's Party Liberal]]), [[Goa]], [[Gujarat]], [[Haryana]] (with [[Jannayak Janta Party]]), [[Madhya Pradesh]], [[Manipur]] (with [[Naga People's Front]], [[National People's Party (India)|National People's Party]] and [[Lok Janshakti Party]]), [[Tripura]] (with [[Indigenous People's Front of Tripura]]), [[Uttar Pradesh]] (with [[Apna Dal (Sonelal)]]) and [[Uttarakhand]]. | |||
In 4 other states and in the [[union territory of Puducherry]], it participates in the government as the junior partner in the ruling alliance with other members of the [[National Democratic Alliance]]. The states are: [[Maharashtra]] (with [[Shiv Sena]], other small parties and independents), [[Meghalaya]] (with the [[National People's Party (India)|National People's Party]], [[United Democratic Party (Meghalaya)|United Democratic Party]], [[People's Democratic Front (Meghalaya)|People's Democratic Front]] and [[Hill State People's Democratic Party]]), [[Nagaland]] (with the [[Nationalist Democratic Progressive Party]]), and [[Puducherry (union territory)|Puducherry]] (with the [[All India N.R. Congress]]). The BJP's ally, the [[Sikkim Krantikari Morcha]], holds power in [[Sikkim]], but the BJP has no ministers in the government. | |||
The BJP has previously held power in [[Karnataka]], [[Chhattisgarh]], [[Delhi]], [[Rajasthan]] and [[Jharkhand]], and has been the junior coalition partner in governments in [[Andhra Pradesh]] (with the [[Telugu Desam Party]]), [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] (with the [[Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party]]), [[Odisha]] (with the [[Biju Janata Dal]]), [[Punjab, India|Punjab]] (with the [[Shiromani Akali Dal]]), and [[Tamil Nadu]] (with the [[All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam]]). It has never held power in [[Kerala]], [[Telangana]], and [[West Bengal]]. | |||
In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the [[North-East Democratic Alliance]].<ref name="auto">{{cite web |last=Pisharoty |first=Sangeeta Barooah |date=25 May 2016 |title=BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt' |url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526113451/http://thewire.in/2016/05/25/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt-38680/ |archive-date=26 May 2016 |website=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]]}}</ref><ref name="hindustantimes.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html|title=Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance|date=25 May 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160526061921/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html|archive-date=26 May 2016}}</ref><ref name="ndtv.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824|title=BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160525135628/http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824|archive-date=25 May 2016}}</ref> | |||
=== Current seats in State Legislative Assemblies === | |||
{{hidden|Legislative Assembly|[[Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|0|175|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|49|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Assam Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|63|126|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Bihar Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|78|243|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|14|90|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Delhi Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|8|70|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Goa Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|28|40|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Gujarat Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|156|182|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Haryana Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|41|90|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|25|68|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly]]†{{Composition bar|0|90|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Jharkhand Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|26|81|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Karnataka Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|66|224|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Kerala Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|0|140|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|130|230|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Maharashtra Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|105|288|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Manipur Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|37|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Meghalaya Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|2|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Mizoram Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|1|40|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Nagaland Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|12|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Odisha Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|22|147|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Puducherry Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|6|30|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Punjab Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|2|117|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Rajasthan Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|70|200|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Sikkim Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|12|32|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|4|234|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Telangana Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|3|119|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Tripura Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|31|60|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|255|403|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|47|70|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[West Bengal Legislative Assembly]]{{Composition bar|70|294|hex=#FF9933}}|headerstyle=background-color:#ccccff|style=text-align:center;}} | |||
=== Current seats in State Legislative councils === | |||
{{hidden|Legislative Council|[[Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|0|58|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Bihar Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|24|75|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Karnataka Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|35|75|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Maharashtra Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|22|78|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Telangana Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|1|40|hex=#FF9933}} | |||
[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council]]{{Composition bar|82|100|hex=#FF9933}}|headerstyle=background-color:#ccccff|style=text-align:center;}} | |||
== List of prime ministers == | |||
{{further|List of prime ministers of India}} | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| No | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Portrait | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Prime minister | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Constituency | |||
! colspan="3" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Term in office | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Lok Sabha | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;" | Cabinet | |||
|- | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Start | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| End | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Tenure | |||
|- style="text-align: center;" | |||
| rowspan="3" |1 | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee tribute image (cropped).jpg|100px]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] | |||
| rowspan ="3" |[[Lucknow (Lok Sabha constituency)|Lucknow]] | |||
| 16 May 1996 | |||
| 1 June 1996 | |||
| rowspan="3" |6 years, 80 days | |||
| [[11th Lok Sabha|11th]] | |||
| [[First Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee I]] | |||
|- style="text-align: center;" | |||
| rowspan="2" |19 March 1998 | |||
| rowspan="2" |22 May 2004 | |||
| [[12th Lok Sabha|12th]] | |||
| [[Second Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee II]] | |||
|- style="text-align: center;" | |||
| [[13th Lok Sabha|13th]] | |||
| [[Third Vajpayee ministry|Vajpayee III]] | |||
|- style="text-align: center;" | |||
| rowspan="2" |2 | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[File:Official Photograph of Prime Minister Narendra Modi Potrait.png|100px]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[Narendra Modi]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[Varanasi (Lok Sabha constituency)|Varanasi]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |26 May 2014 | |||
| rowspan="2" |'''''Incumbent''''' | |||
| rowspan="2" | {{age in years and days|2014|5|26}} | |||
|[[16th Lok Sabha|16th]] | |||
| [[First Modi ministry|Modi I]] | |||
|- style="text-align: center;" | |||
| [[17th Lok Sabha|17th]] | |||
| [[Second Modi ministry|Modi II]] | |||
|} | |||
== List of deputy prime ministers == | |||
{{see|Deputy Prime Minister of India}} | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;" | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| No. | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Portrait | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Deputy PM | |||
! colspan="3" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Term in office | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Lok Sabha | |||
! rowspan="2" style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Prime Minister | |||
|- | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Start | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| End | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"| Tenure | |||
|- | |||
|1 | |||
|[[File:Lkadvani.jpg|80px]] | |||
|[[Lal Krishna Advani]] | |||
|{{dts|29 June 2002}} | |||
|{{dts|22 May 2004}} | |||
|1 year, 328 days | |||
|[[13th Lok Sabha|13th]] | |||
|[[Atal Bihari Vajpayee]] | |||
|} | |||
== List of current chief ministers == | |||
{{Main|List of chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
{{As of|2022|5}}, 49 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 11 of whom are incumbent. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center" | |||
|+'''Incumbent chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party''' | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|No | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|State | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;" |Portrait | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;" |Name | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;"|Cabinet | |||
! style="background:#f93; color:white;" colspan="2"|Governing coalition | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=2|1 | |||
|Rowspan=2|[[Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Arunachal Pradesh]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[File:Pema Khandu in July 2016.jpg|80px|border]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[Pema Khandu]] | |||
|Rowspan=2|[[Second Pema Khandu ministry|Khandu II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#db7093;"| | |||
|[[National People's Party (India)|NPP]] | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=3| 2 | |||
|Rowspan=3|[[Assam Legislative Assembly|Assam]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[File:Himanta Biswa Sarma with PM Narendra Modi Cropped.jpg|80px|border]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[Himanta Biswa Sarma]] | |||
|Rowspan=3|[[Sarma ministry|Sarma]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#9cf;"| | |||
|[[Asom Gana Parishad|AGP]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#f3ed13;"| | |||
|[[United People's Party Liberal|UPPL]] | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=3| 3 | |||
|Rowspan=3|[[Goa Legislative Assembly|Goa]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[File:The Chief Minister of Goa, Shri Pramod Sawant.jpg|80px|border]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[Pramod Sawant]] | |||
|Rowspan=3|[[Second Pramod Sawant ministry|Sawant II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#93c;"| | |||
|[[Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party|MGP]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"| | |||
|[[Independent politician|IND]] | |||
|- | |||
| 4 | |||
|[[Gujarat Legislative Assembly|Gujarat]] | |||
|[[File:Bhupendrabhai Patel accompanies Narendra Modi at Rajkot (cropped).jpg|80px|border]] | |||
|[[Bhupendrabhai Patel]] | |||
|[[First Bhupendrabhai Patel ministry|Patel II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=4| 5 | |||
|Rowspan=4|[[Haryana Legislative Assembly|Haryana]] | |||
| rowspan="4" |[[File:Manohar Lal Khattar 2015.jpg|80px|border]] | |||
| rowspan="4" |[[Manohar Lal Khattar]] | |||
|Rowspan=4|[[Second Khattar ministry|Khattar II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#026d37;"| | |||
| [[Jannayak Janata Party|JJP]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#0093ed;"| | |||
|[[Haryana Lokhit Party|HLP]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"| | |||
|[[Independent politician|IND]] | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=2| 6 | |||
|Rowspan=2|[[Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Madhya Pradesh]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[File:Shivraj Singh Chauhan (cropped 2).jpg|108x108px]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[Shivraj Singh Chouhan]] | |||
|Rowspan=2|[[Fourth Chouhan ministry|Chouhan IV]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"| | |||
|[[Independent politician|IND]] | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=5| 7 | |||
|Rowspan=5|[[Manipur Legislative Assembly|Manipur]] | |||
| rowspan="5" |[[File:N. Biren Singh.jpg|80px|border]] | |||
| rowspan="5" |[[N. Biren Singh]] | |||
|Rowspan=5|[[Second N. Biren Singh ministry|Singh II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#DB7093| | |||
|[[National People's Party (India)|NPP]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#906;"| | |||
|[[Naga People's Front|NPF]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#f00;"| | |||
|[[Kuki People's Alliance|KPA]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"| | |||
|[[Independent politician|IND]] | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=2| 8 | |||
|Rowspan=2|[[Tripura Legislative Assembly|Tripura]] | |||
| rowspan="2" | [[File:Manik Saha Invitation for HWC 2023.jpg|80px|border]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[Manik Saha]] | |||
|Rowspan=2| [[Second Saha ministry|Saha II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:green;"| | |||
|[[Indigenous People's Front of Tripura|IPFT]] | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=3| 9 | |||
|Rowspan=3|[[Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly|Uttar Pradesh]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[File:Yogi Adityanath.jpg|107x107px]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |[[Yogi Adityanath]] | |||
|Rowspan=3|[[Second Yogi Adityanath ministry|Adityanath II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#306;"| | |||
|[[Apna Dal (Sonelal)|AD(S)]] | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#b80000;"| | |||
|[[NISHAD Party|NP]] | |||
|- | |||
|Rowspan=2| 10 | |||
|Rowspan=2| [[Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly|Uttarakhand]] | |||
| rowspan="2" | [[File:Pushkar Dhami.jpg|80px]] | |||
| rowspan="2" | [[Pushkar Singh Dhami]] | |||
|Rowspan=2| [[Second Dhami ministry|Dhami II]] | |||
| style="background:#f93;"| | |||
|BJP | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#cdcdcd;"| | |||
|[[Independent politician|IND]] | |||
|} | |||
== See also == | |||
{{div col|colwidth=40em}} | |||
* [[Leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Parliament of India]] | |||
* [[List of political parties in India]] | |||
* [[List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party]] | |||
* [[List of state presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party]] | |||
* [[Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party]] | |||
* [[Politics of India]] | |||
* [[List of ruling political parties by country]] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{ | === Explanatory notes === | ||
{{Notelist|30em}} | |||
=== Citations === | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
=== General and cited sources === | |||
{{Refbegin|30em}} | |||
<!-- ToDo: Re-organize A->Z by last names --> | |||
* {{citation |last1=Sharma |first1=Chetna |title=Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016: Continuities and contestations with special reference to politics in Assam, India |journal=Asian Ethnicity |volume=20 |issue=4 |year=2019 |pages=522–540 |doi=10.1080/14631369.2019.1601993|s2cid=150837053 }} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Sen |first1=Uditi |title=Citizen Refugee: Forging the Indian Nation after Partition |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |year=2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-42561-2 |access-date=16 June 2020 |archive-date=14 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061242/https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 |url-status=live }} | |||
* {{citation |last1=Jayal |first1=Niraja Gopal |title=Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=42 |issue=1 |year=2019 |pages=33–50 |issn=0085-6401 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874|doi-access=free }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Abbas |first1 = Hassan |title = Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror |publisher = M.E. Sharpe |year = 2004 |isbn = 978-0-7656-1497-1 |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/pakistansdriftin00hass }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Uproar over India mosque report: Inquiry into Babri mosque's demolition in 1992 indicts opposition BJP leaders |url = http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |access-date = 8 July 2014 |work = Al Jazeera |date = 24 November 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Al Jazeera |2009}} |archive-date = 31 January 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100131082341/http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Banerjee |first1 = Sumanta |title = Civilising the BJP |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 22 July 2005 |volume = 40 |issue = 29 |pages = 3116–3119 |jstor = 4416896 }} | |||
* {{cite news |url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |title = Narendra Modi sworn in as Indian prime minister |date = 26 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |work = BBC News |ref = {{harvid |BBC |May |2014}} |archive-date = 2 July 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180702163012/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |title = Indian Astrology vs Indian Science |url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |publisher = BBC World Service |access-date = 17 January 2014 |ref = {{harvid |BBC |January |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223838/http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |last1 = Bhatt |first1 = Sheela |title = What Anandiben Patel is really like |url = http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Rediff |ref = {{harvid |Sheela Bhatt |2014}} |archive-date = 23 June 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140623212643/http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Bobbio |first = Tommaso |title = Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India |journal = Third World Quarterly |year = 2012 |volume = 33 |issue = 4 |pages = 653–668 |doi = 10.1080/01436597.2012.657423 |s2cid = 154422056 |url = https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |access-date = 29 June 2019 |archive-date = 1 March 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200301151004/https://zenodo.org/record/1047619 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |title = The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India |last = Brass |first = Paul R. |publisher = University of Washington Press |year = 2005 |isbn = 978-0-295-98506-0 |pages = 385–393}} | |||
* {{cite news |last1 = Buncombe |first1 = Andrew |title = India's gay community scrambling after court decision recriminalises homosexuality |url = https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/indias-gay-community-scrambling-after-court-decision-recriminalises-homosexuality-9146244.html |access-date = 11 July 2014 |work = The Independent |date = 11 July 2014 |archive-date = 5 September 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140905153333/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/indias-gay-community-scrambling-after-court-decision-recriminalises-homosexuality-9146244.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = It is the govt.'s responsibility to protect LGBT rights, says Harsh Vardhan |url = http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |access-date = 19 July 2014 |work = Business Standard |date = 17 July 2014 |location = Mumbai, India |ref = {{harvid |Business Standard |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223853/http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Chaulia |first = Sreeram |s2cid = 144714683 |title = BJP, India's Foreign Policy and the "Realist Alternative" to the Nehruvian Tradition |journal = International Politics |date = June 2002 |volume = 39 |issue = 2 |pages = 215–234 |doi = 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8897388}} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last = Davies |first = Richard |editor-first = Alyssa & Philip |editor-last = Ayres & Oldenburg |encyclopedia = India Briefing; Takeoff at Last? |title = The Cultural Background of Hindutva |year = 2005 |publisher = Asia Society }} | |||
* {{cite web | url = http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today | title = Narendra Modi to be sworn in as 15th Prime Minister of India on May 26 | work = [[Deccan Chronicle]] | date = 20 May 2014 | access-date = 26 May 2014 | ref = {{harvid |Deccan Chronicle |2014}} | archive-date = 27 May 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140527225918/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today | url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Diwakar |first = Rekha |title = The 16th general election in India, April–May 2014 |journal = Electoral Studies |volume = 37 |year = 2014 |pages = 1–6 |doi = 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.005}} | |||
* {{cite web |title = General Election to Lok Sabha Trends and Results |url = http://eciresults.nic.in/ |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 June 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2014}} |archive-date = 18 December 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141218160549/http://eciresults.nic.in/ |url-status = dead }} | |||
* {{cite web |title = List of Political Parties and Election Symbols main Notification Dated 18 January 2013 |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 9 May 2013 |location = India |year = 2013 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2013}} |archive-date = 24 October 2013 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131024171915/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1984 to the Eighth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1984}} |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718184911/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf |archive-date = 18 July 2014 }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1989 to the Ninth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1989}} |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183934/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf |archive-date = 18 July 2014 }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 18 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1991}} |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183558/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf |archive-date = 18 July 2014 }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 30 May 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |1996}} |archive-date = 18 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183504/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha |publisher=Election Commission of India |access-date=30 May 2014 |ref={{harvid |Election Commission |1998}} |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718181833/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 }} | |||
* {{cite web |url=http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |title=Statistical report on general elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha |publisher=Election Commission of India |access-date=30 May 2014 |ref={{harvid |Election Commission |1999}} |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183222/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2014 }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |title = Statistical report on general elections, 2004 to the Fourteenth Lok Sabha |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 30 May 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2004}} |archive-date = 18 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140718190634/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |title = Performance of National Parties |publisher = Election Commission of India |access-date = 30 May 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Election Commission |2009}} |archive-date = 9 December 2017 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171209173959/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Fitzgerald |first = Timothy |title = Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth |date = 2011 |publisher = A&C Black |isbn = 978-1-4411-4290-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061250/https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Flint |first = Colin |title = The geography of war and peace |publisher = Oxford University Press |year = 2005 |isbn = 978-0-19-516208-0 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |access-date = 15 November 2015 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061243/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Ganguly |first1 = Sumit |s2cid = 57565560 |title = India's Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program |journal = International Security |date =Spring 1999 |volume = 23 |issue = 4 |pages = 148–177 |jstor = 2539297 |doi = 10.1162/isec.23.4.148}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Ghassem-Fachandi |first1 = Parvis |title = Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India |date = 2012 |publisher = Princeton University Press |isbn = 978-0-691-15177-9 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=p5s8hooZfekC }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Gillan |first = Michael |s2cid = 146522066 |title = Refugees or Infiltrators? The Bharatiya Janata Party and "Illegal" Migration from Bangladesh |journal = Asian Studies Review |date = March 2002 |volume = 26 |issue = 1 |pages = 73–95 |doi = 10.1080/10357820208713331}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Guha |first1 = Ramachandra |author-link = Ramachandra Guha |title = India after Gandhi: the history of the world's largest democracy |date = 2007 |publisher = Picador |location = India |isbn = 978-0-330-39610-3 |edition = 1st|title-link = India after Gandhi }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Gupta |first = Dipankar |title = Justice before Reconciliation: Negotiating a 'New Normal' in Post-riot Mumbai and Ahmedabad |year = 2011 |publisher = Routledge |isbn = 978-0-415-61254-8 |page = 34}} | |||
* {{cite news |first = Samar |last = Halarnkar |title = Narendra Modi makes his move |work = BBC News |date = 13 June 2012 |url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18352532 |quote = The right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), India's primary opposition party |ref = {{harvid |BBC |2012}} |access-date = 21 June 2018 |archive-date = 8 March 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210308014030/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18352532 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Hansen |first = Thomas |title = The saffron wave : democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India |publisher = Princeton University Press |location = Princeton, NJ |year = 1999 |isbn = 978-0-691-00671-0 }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Harris |first = Gardiner |title = Justice and 'a Ray of Hope' After 2002 India Riots |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/world/asia/gujarat-riot-trials-may-alter-indias-cycle-of-violence.html |work = The New York Times |access-date = 25 February 2014 |date = 2 July 2012 |archive-date = 7 April 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140407115729/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/world/asia/gujarat-riot-trials-may-alter-indias-cycle-of-violence.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Harris |first = Jerry |s2cid = 154768728 |title = Emerging Third World powers: China, India and Brazil |journal = Race & Class |year = 2005 |volume = 46 |issue = 7 |pages = 7–27 |doi = 10.1177/0306396805050014}} | |||
* {{cite news |title = The Meaning of Verdict 2004 |url = http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/14/stories/2004051406131000.htm |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20040916145623/http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/14/stories/2004051406131000.htm |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 September 2004 |access-date = 10 December 2013 |date = 14 May 2004 |location = Chennai, India |work = [[The Hindu]] |ref = {{harvid |The Hindu |2004}} }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Inventing History |work= The Hindu |date = 14 October 2002 |ref = {{harvid |The Hindu |2002}}}} | |||
* {{cite news |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131230070038/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 30 December 2013 |title = Modi did not incite riots: SIT |work = Hindustan Times |access-date = 22 January 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2014}} }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = 2009 Lok Sabha election: Final results tally |url = http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/2009-lok-sabha-election-final-results-tally/article1-411793.aspx |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130611071616/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/2009-Lok-Sabha-election-Final-results-tally/Article1-411793.aspx |url-status = dead |archive-date = 11 June 2013 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |work = Hindustan Times |date = 17 May 2009 |ref = {{harvid |Hindustan Times |2009}} }} | |||
* {{cite web |title = Tehelka sting: How Bangaru Laxman fell for the trap |url = http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html |work = [[India Today]] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |ref = {{harvid |India Today |2001}} |archive-date = 14 May 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120514204516/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher = C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year = 1996 |isbn = 978-1-85065-301-1 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Jaffrelot |first = Christophe |author-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class |journal = Studies in Indian Politics |date = June 2013 |volume = 1 |pages = 2–27 |doi = 10.1177/2321023013482789|s2cid = 154404089 }} | |||
* {{cite news |last1 = Jha |first1 = Nilanjana Bhaduri |title = Survey shows temple remains in Ayodhya: VHP |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Survey-shows-temple-remains-in-Ayodhya-VHP/articleshow/38195328.cms |access-date = 11 July 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 21 February 2003 |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223815/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Survey-shows-temple-remains-in-Ayodhya-VHP/articleshow/38195328.cms |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Bangaru Laxman convicted of taking bribe |url = http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |work = [[The Hindu]] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |first = Jiby |last = Kattakayam |date = 27 April 2012 |location = Chennai, India |archive-date = 1 May 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120501113222/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Krishnan |first1 = Jayanth |title = India's "Patriot Act": POTA and the Impact on Civil Liberties in the World's Largest Democracy |journal = Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice |date = 2004 |volume = 22 |issue = 2 |pages = 265–300 |url = http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379 |issn = 2767-1992 |access-date = 27 June 2014 |archive-date = 28 July 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140728192217/http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379/ |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Krishnan |first = Murali |title = Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims |url = http://www.dw.de/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |publisher = Deutsche Welle |date = 11 March 2012 |author2 = Shamil Shams |ref = {{harvid |Krishnan |2012}} |access-date = 20 December 2013 |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223515/http://www.dw.de/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Kux |first1 = Dennis |title = India's Fine Balance |journal = Foreign Affairs |date = May–June 2002 |volume = 81 |issue = 3 |pages = 93–106 |jstor = 20033165 |doi = 10.2307/20033165}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Lall |first1 = Marie |title = Indo-Myanmar Relations in the Era of Pipeline Diplomacy |journal = Contemporary Southeast Asia |date = December 2006 |volume = 28 |issue = 3|doi = 10.1355/CS28-3D |s2cid = 154093220 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Malik |first1 = Yogendra K. |last2 = Singh |first2 = V.B. |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: An Alternative to the Congress (I)? |journal = Asian Survey |date = April 1992 |volume = 32 |issue = 4 |pages = 318–336 |jstor = 2645149 |doi = 10.2307/2645149}} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Mathew |first = Liz |url = http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |title = Narendra Modi makes election history as BJP gets majority on its own |work = [[Live Mint]] |date = 16 May 2014 |access-date = 26 May 2014 |archive-date = 27 May 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140527035606/http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Naqvi |first1 = Saba |last2 = Raman |first2 = Anuradha |journal = Outlook |title = Their Dark Glasses |date = 1 April 2013 |url = http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |ref = {{harvid |Outlook |2013}} |access-date = 23 May 2015 |archive-date = 21 December 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151221141359/http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546 |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |title = Lok Sabha at a glance |publisher = National Informatics Centre |access-date = 17 July 2014 |ref = {{harvid |National Informatics Centre |2014}} |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140521205101/http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm |archive-date = 21 May 2014 |url-status = dead }} | |||
* {{cite web |title = Report: Sequence of events on December 6 |url = http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |publisher = NDTV |access-date = 20 June 2012 |ref = {{harvid |NDTV |2012}} |archive-date = 26 September 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100926132622/http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-18-years-in-jail-261251 |title = Naroda Patiya riots: Former minister Maya Kodnani gets 28 years in jail |publisher = NDTV.com |access-date = 17 November 2012 |ref = {{harvid |NDTV.com |2012}} |archive-date = 26 December 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181226045146/https://www.ndtv.com/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-28-years-in-jail-498222 |url-status = dead }} | |||
* {{cite journal |first = A. G. |last = Noorani |title = Foreign Policy of the Janata Party Government |journal = Asian Affairs |volume = 5 |date = March–April 1978 |pages = 216–228 |jstor = 30171643 |issue = 4 |doi = 10.1080/00927678.1978.10554044}} | |||
* {{cite book |last = Nussbaum |first = Martha Craven |title = The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future |year = 2008 |publisher = Harvard University Press |isbn = 978-0-674-03059-6 |page = 2}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Pai |first1 = Sudha |title = Transformation of the Indian Party System: The 1996 Lok Sabha Elections |journal = Asian Survey |date = December 1996 |volume = 36 |issue = 12 |pages = 1170–1183 |jstor = 2645573 |doi = 10.2307/2645573}} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |title = An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999 |date = April 2002 |last = Qadir |first = Shaukat |work = RUSI Journal |access-date = 20 May 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120655/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf |archive-date = 27 March 2009 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Ramachandran |first = Sujata |title = 'Operation Pushback' Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi |journal = Economic & Political Weekly |date = 15 February 2003 |volume = 38 |issue = 7 |pages = 637–647 |jstor = 4413218 }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Ramaseshan |first = Radhika |title = BJP comes out, vows to oppose homosexuality |url = http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131216103934/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 December 2013 |access-date = 16 December 2013 |work = The Telegraph |date = 14 December 2013 |location = Calcutta, India }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Ramesh |first = Randeep |title = News World news Shock defeat for India's Hindu nationalists |url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |access-date = 10 December 2013 |work = The Guardian |date = 14 May 2004 |archive-date = 12 June 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180612144006/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |title = TDP helps Vajpayee wins confidence vote |work = Rediff.com |access-date = 4 January 2011 |ref = {{harvid |rediff.com |1998}} |archive-date = 2 May 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100502104757/http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Sen |first1 = Amartya |title = India and the world. |date = 2005 |publisher = 2005. |location = Allen Lane |isbn = 978-0-7139-9687-6 |edition = 1. publ.}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Seshia |first = Shaila |title = Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |journal = Asian Survey |date = November 1998 |volume = 38 |issue = 11 |pages = 1036–1050 |doi = 10.2307/2645684|jstor = 2645684 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Shulman |first = Stephen |title = Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration |journal = International Studies Quarterly |date = September 2000 |volume = 44 |issue = 3 |pages = 365–390 |doi = 10.1111/0020-8833.00164}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Sridharan |first = Eswaran |title = India's Watershed Vote |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014 |url = https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |access-date = 23 April 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150112142754/https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal%20of%20Democracy,%20Sridharan%20article%202014.pdf |archive-date = 12 January 2015 |url-status = dead }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1 = Swain |first1 = Pratap Chandra |title = Bharatiya Janata Party: Profile and Performance |date = 2001 |publisher = APH publishing |location = India |isbn = 978-81-7648-257-8 |pages = 71–104 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |access-date = 5 July 2014 |archive-date = 14 April 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230414061228/https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite web |title = Bangaru Laxman convicted for taking bribe |url = http://www.tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |work = [[Tehelka]] |access-date = 9 May 2012 |ref = {{harvid |Tehelka |2001}} |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120511094603/http://tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp |archive-date = 11 May 2012 |url-status = dead }} | |||
* {{cite web |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |title = Election results 2014: India places its faith in Moditva |publisher = Timesofindia.indiatimes.com |date = 17 May 2014 |access-date = 11 August 2014 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2014}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223225/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |url = http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-07-13/mumbai/27289812_1_vaiko-pota-prevention-of-terrorism-act |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120916205038/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-07-13/mumbai/27289812_1_vaiko-pota-prevention-of-terrorism-act |url-status = dead |archive-date = 16 September 2012 |title = SP condemns Vaiko's arrest under Pota |date = 13 July 2002 |work = [[The Times of India]] |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2002}} }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = BJP amends constitution allowing Gadkari to get a second term |url = http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |access-date = 4 April 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 28 September 2012 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2012}} |archive-date = 20 October 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141020223443/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |title = Stand with RSS, BJP |url = http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |access-date = 13 March 2014 |work = The Times of India |date = 20 December 2013 |ref = {{harvid |Times of India |2013}} |archive-date = 13 March 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140313193845/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite news |last = Chatterjee |first = Mohua |url = http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |title = BJP enrolls 11 crore members, launches 'Mahasampark Abhiyan' |work = First Post |date = 13 July 2015 |ref = {{harvid |First Post |2015}} |access-date = 14 July 2015 |archive-date = 24 September 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150924144320/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1 = Tiwari |first1 = Aviral Kumar |title = An Error-Correction Analysis of India-Us Trade Flows |journal = Journal of Economic Development |date = March 2012 |volume = 37 |issue = 1}} | |||
* {{cite web |title = India: International Religious Freedom Report |url = https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |publisher = US Department of state |access-date = 11 August 2014 |ref = {{harvid |International Religious Freedom Report |2005}} |archive-date = 3 July 2017 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170703181658/https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm |url-status = live }} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last = Vajpayee |first = Atal Bihari |editor-first = Christophe |editor-last = Jaffrelot |editor-link = Christophe Jaffrelot |title = Hindu Nationalism: A Reader |year = 2007 |publisher = [[Permanent Black]] |location = Delhi |isbn = 978-0-691-13098-9 }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last = Varshney |first = Ashutosh |s2cid = 144608424 |title = Hindu Nationalism in Power? |journal = Journal of Democracy |volume = 25 |issue = 4 |date = October 2014|pages = 34–45 |doi = 10.1353/jod.2014.0071 }} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
{{Refbegin|30em}} | |||
{{Main|Bibliography of the Sangh Parivar}} | |||
* {{cite book|first=Gurdas M.|last=Ahuja|title=Bharatiya Janata Party and Resurgent India|publisher=Ram Company|year=2004 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book |first1=Walter K. |last1=Andersen |author-link=Walter K. Andersen |first2=Shridhar D. |last2=Damle |title=The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism |url=https://archive.org/details/brotherhoodinsaf0000ande |url-access=registration |orig-year=Originally published by Westview Press |publisher=Vistaar Publications |location=Delhi |year=1987 |ref=none }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Bhambhri |first1=C.P. |title=Bharatiya Janata Party : Periphery to Centre |date=2001 |publisher=Shipra |location=Delhi |isbn=978-81-7541-078-7 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book |first=Craig |last=Baxter |author-link=Craig Baxter |title=The Jana Sangh — A Biography of an Indian Political Party |publisher=Oxford University Press, Bombay |year=1971 |orig-year=first published by [[University of Pennsylvania Press]] 1969 |isbn=978-0-8122-7583-4 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/janasanghbiograp0000baxt |ref=none }} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Chadha|first1=Kalyani|first2=Pallavi|last2=Guha|title=The Bharatiya Janata Party's online campaign and citizen involvement in India's 2014 election|url=https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947|journal=[[International Journal of Communication]]|volume=10|date=2016|access-date=16 May 2021|archive-date=16 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516184915/https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last=Ganguly|first=Sumit|title=Hindu nationalism and the foreign policy of India's Bharatiya Janata Party|journal=Transatlantic Academy Paper Series|volume=2|date=2015|pages=1–15|url=https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf|isbn=978-1-5292-0460-5|access-date=11 January 2021|archive-date=4 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304071320/https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf|url-status=dead}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Graham |first=B. D. |title=Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and Development of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-38348-6 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite journal|url=[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826 |doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826 |title=Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics |year=2015 |last1=Harriss |first1=John |journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=712–718 |s2cid=147615034 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Malik |first1=Yogendra K. |last2=Singh |first2=V.B. |title=Hindu Nationalists in India : The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party |date=1994 |publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, Colorado |isbn=978-0-8133-8810-6}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Jaffrelot |first=Christophe |author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot|title=The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics |publisher=C. Hurst & Co. Publishers |year=1996 |isbn=978-1-85065-301-1 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last=Jaffrelot|first=Christophe|author-link=Christophe Jaffrelot|title=Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?|journal=Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics|date=July 2003|page=16|url=http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf|access-date=5 November 2013|ref=none|archive-date=4 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204131058/http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf|url-status=live}} | |||
* {{cite journal|last1=Jain|first1=Varsha|first2=Ganesh|last2=B.E.|title=Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders: A Case of India and Narendra Modi.|journal=Journal of Political Marketing|volume=19|issue=1–2|date=2020|pages=15–33|doi=10.1080/15377857.2019.1652222|s2cid=202247610}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Mishra |first1=Madhusudan |title=Bharatiya Janata Party and India's Foreign Policy |date=1997 |publisher=Uppal Pub. House |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-85565-79-8 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Nag |first=Kingshuk |author-link=Kingshuk Nag |title=The Saffron Tide: The Rise of the BJP |publisher=Rupa Publications |year=2014 |isbn=978-8129134295 |ref=none}} | |||
* Nag, Kingshuk. ''Atal Bihari Vajpayee'' (Rupa Publications, 2016). | |||
* Palshikar, Suhas, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Lodha, eds. ''Electoral Politics in India: The Resurgence of the Bharatiya Janata Party'' (Taylor & Francis, 2017). | |||
* Raghavan, G.N.S. ''New Era in the Indian Polity, A Study of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the BJP'' (1996). | |||
* {{cite journal|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856327 |jstor=41856327 |title=Foreign Policy Position of Bharatiya Janata Party Towards Issues of India Pakistan Relations |last1=Sanjeev Kr |first1=H. M. |journal=The Indian Journal of Political Science |year=2007 |volume=68 |issue=2 |pages=275–291 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Sharma |first1=C.P. Thakur, Devendra P. |title=India under Atal Behari Vajpayee : The BJP Era |date=1999 |publisher=UBS Publishers' Distributors |location=New Delhi |isbn=978-81-7476-250-4 |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book|last1=Stein|first1=Burton|title=A history of India|year=2010|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|location=Chichester, UK|isbn=978-1-4051-9509-6|edition= edited by David Arnold. 2nd |ref=none}} | |||
* {{cite book|last1=Rao|first1=Ramesh|title=Coalition conundrum: the BJP's trials, tribulations, and triumphs|year=2001|publisher=Har Anand|isbn=9788124108093 |ref=none}} | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
== External links == | |||
<!-- ATTENTION! Please do not add links without discussion and consensus on the talk page. Undiscussed links will be removed. --> | |||
* {{Official website|https://www.bjp.org/}} | |||
* {{GovPubs|bjp%20india|BJP}} | |||
* {{Curlie|Regional/Asia/India/Society_and_Culture/Politics/Parties/Bharatiya_Janata_Party/|BJP}} | |||
* {{Internet Archive author|sname=Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
* {{Britannica|64033}} | |||
{{Bharatiya Janata Party}} | |||
{{Navboxes | |||
|title=[[:Category:Bharatiya Janata Party|Related to Bharatiya Janata Party]] | |||
|list1= | |||
{{Sangh Parivar}} | |||
{{National Democratic Alliance}} | |||
{{Indian political parties}} | |||
{{Hindu Nationalism}} | |||
}} | |||
{{ | {{Authority control}} | ||
[[Category:Political parties in | [[Category:Bharatiya Janata Party| ]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:1980 establishments in India]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Anti-communist parties]] | ||
[[Category:Anti-communism in India]] | |||
[[Category:Anti-Islam sentiment in India]] | |||
[[Category:Conservative parties in India]] | |||
[[Category:Conservative parties in Asia]] | |||
[[Category:Hindu political parties]] | |||
[[Category:Hindu organisations based in India]] | |||
[[Category:Hindu nationalism]] | |||
[[Category:Hindutva]] | |||
[[Category:Identity politics]] | |||
[[Category:Identity politics in India]] | |||
[[Category:Indian Hindu political parties]] | |||
[[Category:Indian nationalist political parties]] | |||
[[Category:International Democrat Union member parties]] | |||
[[Category:National conservative parties]] | |||
[[Category:National political parties in India]] | |||
[[Category:Nationalist parties in India]] | |||
[[Category:Neoliberal parties]] | |||
[[Category:Political parties established in 1980]] | |||
[[Category:Right-wing parties in Asia]] | |||
[[Category:Right-wing parties]] | |||
[[Category:Right-wing populism in India]] | |||
[[Category:Right-wing populist parties]] | |||
[[Category:Social conservative parties]] | |||
[[Category:Sangh Parivar]] |
Latest revision as of 12:18, 19 February 2025
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP; transl. Indian People's Party) is a political party in India, and one of the two major Indian political parties alongside the Indian National Congress.[38] Since 2014, it has been the ruling political party in India under Narendra Modi, the incumbent Indian prime minister.[39] The BJP is aligned with right-wing politics, and its policies adhere to Hindutva, a Hindu nationalist ideology.[40][41] It has close ideological and organisational links to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).[42] As of March 2023[update], it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the Parliament of India as well as state legislatures.
The party's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician Shyama Prasad Mukherjee.[43] After The Emergency of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the Janata Party; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the 1977 general election. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the 1984 general election, it grew in strength on the back of the movement around Ram Janmabhoomi in Uttar Pradesh. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee, lasted for only 13 days.[44]
After the 1998 general election, the BJP-led coalition known as the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the 2004 general election, the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the chief minister of Gujarat, led the party to a landslide victory in the 2014 general election. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected in the 2019 general election. As of June 2023[update], the alliance governs 15 Indian states and union territories.
The official ideology of the BJP is integral humanism, first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965. The party advocates social conservatism and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindu-nationalist priorities, and focused on a largely liberal economic policy that prioritised globalisation and economic growth over social welfare.[45] Since returning to government in 2014, the BJP government has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of triple talaq, and revoking Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which granted autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir, and also abrogating its statehood.[46] India has experienced nationwide democratic backsliding under the BJP's rule since 2014.[47][48]
HistoryEdit
PredecessorsEdit
Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77)Edit
The BJP's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by Syama Prasad Mukherjee in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant Congress party. It was founded in collaboration with the Hindu nationalist volunteer organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), and was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS.[49] The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of Pakistan by the Congress party and then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. The RSS loaned several of its leading pracharaks, or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was Deendayal Upadhyaya, who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three Lok Sabha seats in the first general elections in 1952. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.[50][51]
The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India.[52] Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail.[52] Mauli Chandra Sharma was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of integral humanism, which formed the official doctrine of the party.[53] Younger leaders, such as Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Lal Krishna Advani also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a uniform civil code, banning cow slaughter and abolishing the special status given to Jammu and Kashmir.[54]
After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the Swatantra Party and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the Hindi heartland, including Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.[55]
Janata Party (1977–80)Edit
In 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed a state of emergency. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the Socialist Party, the Congress (O) and the Bharatiya Lok Dal to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi.[51] The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with Morarji Desai as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. Vajpayee, previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the Minister of External Affairs.[56]
The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation.[57] The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party.[58] Violence between Hindus and Muslims increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in Aligarh and Jamshedpur in 1978–79. The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the Jana Sangh should break from the RSS, which the Jana Sangh refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the Janata Party (Secular). The Morarji Desai government was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing its resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.[59][56]
BJP (1980–present)Edit
Formation and early daysEdit
Although the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president.[60] Historian Ramachandra Guha writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the Hindu nationalist stance of its predecessor the Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of Gandhian Socialism.[61] This was unsuccessful, as it won only two Lok Sabha seats in the elections of 1984.[61] The assassination of Indira Gandhi a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the Congress which won a record tally of 403 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.[62]
Ram Janmabhoomi movementEdit
The failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindu nationalism.[61][63] In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. In the early 1980s, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a temple dedicated to the Hindu deity Rama at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor Babur in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there.[64] The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque.[65] The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 Lok Sabha seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the National Front government of V. P. Singh.[66]
In September 1990, Advani began a rath yatra (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the yatra was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim".[67] Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then Bihar chief minister Lalu Prasad Yadav. A large number of kar sevaks (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several kar sevaks. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh. [68] The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the Uttar Pradesh assembly.[69]
On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque.[69] The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the demolition of the mosque.[69] Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people.[69] The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition.[70][71] Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act.[69] In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament.[44] Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.[44]
A 2009 report, authored by Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP.[71] Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and Murli Manohar Joshi. The report also criticised Kalyan Singh, Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition.[71] He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition.[71] In 2020, the Supreme Court of India acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.[72]
NDA government (1998, 1999 - 2004)Edit
A coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the Samata Party, the Shiromani Akali Dal, the Shiv Sena in addition to the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the Biju Janata Dal. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; Amartya Sen, for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping.[73] The NDA had a majority with outside support from the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister.[74] However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, Jayalalitha, withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.[75]
On 13 October 1999, the NDA, without the AIADMK, won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister[lower-alpha 1] and Home Minister. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror as well as neo-liberal economic policies.[45] In 2001, Bangaru Laxman, then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in a sting operation.[76][77] He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.[78]
2002 Gujarat violenceEdit
On 27 February 2002, a train carrying Hindu pilgrims was burned outside the town of Godhra, killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of Gujarat that lasted several weeks.[79] The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced.[80] Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread.[80][81] The then-Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties.[82] In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT. BJP MLA Maya Kodnani, who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment;[83][84] she was later acquitted by the Gujarat High Court.[85] Scholars such as Paul Brass, Martha Nussbaum and Dipankar Gupta have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.[86][87][88]
General election defeatsEdit
Vajpayee called for early elections in 2004, six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "India Shining", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country.[89] However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the Lok Sabha, compared to the 222 of the Congress and its allies. Manmohan Singh succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the United Progressive Alliance. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.[89][90]
In May 2008, the BJP won the state elections in Karnataka. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any South Indian state. In the 2009 general elections, its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. It lost the Karnataka assembly election in 2013.[91]
NDA government (2014–present)Edit
In the 2014 Indian general election, the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha.[92] Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th Prime Minister of India on 26 May 2014.[93][94] The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won.[95] This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament[96] and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its own strength. Support was concentrated in the Hindi-speaking belt in North-central India.[95] The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.[95]
Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term.[97] The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and Dalit people, as well as among Other Backward Classes.[98][95] Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP.[98][95] The BJP was also very successful at mobilising its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.[95]
In 2019, the BJP won the general election with a majority. Soon after coming to power, on 5 August 2019, the Modi administration revoked the special status, or limited autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state and this states consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of dispute among India, Pakistan, and China since 1947.[99][100]
Later in 2019, the Modi government introduced the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, which was passed by the Parliament of India on 11 December 2019. It amended the Citizenship Act, 1955 by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian religion, who had fled persecution from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan before December 2014.[101][102] Muslims from those countries were not given such eligibility.[103] The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law.[103][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 4] A report by the V-Dem Institute described India as experiencing democratic backsliding during the Modi-led BJP's rule.[47][48], which is often considered a notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian Emergency years (1975-77).[104][105]
Ideology and political positionsEdit
Social policies and HindutvaEdit
The official philosophy of the BJP is "Integral humanism," a philosophy first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage."[106][107] It is committed to Hindutva, an ideology articulated by Indian independence activist Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over westernisation, thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion.[61] Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a Hindu nationalist party in a general sense.[69][61][108][109] The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.[69][45]
The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the Ram Temple at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque.[108] This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections.[108] However, the demolition of the mosque during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in a backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda.[108] The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools.[110] Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "saffronise" Indian history.[110][111][112][113] The NDA government introduced Vedic astrology as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.[114]
Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions.[115] In 2014, Yellapragada Sudershan Rao, who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR).[116] Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.[116][117][118] Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars Nandini Sundar and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions.[46] The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasizing the role of Jawaharlal Nehru, and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.[46][119]
The BJP supports a uniform civil code, which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority.[61][108] The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted,[120][121][122] the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its accession to the Indian Union.[61] It simultaneously abrogated Jammu and Kashmir statehood, reorganizing it into two union territories, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.[46]
The BJP opposes illegal immigration into India from Bangladesh.[109] The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy and stability of the country.[109] Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants.[109] Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful.[109][123] The party later became the party of government in Assam.[124] The Modi administration passed a citizenship law in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who are Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians.[101][102] The law does not grant such eligibility to Muslims.[125][126][103] This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law: it attracted global criticism, and sparked widespread protests that were halted by the COVID-19 pandemic.[46][103][lower-alpha 5] Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the 2020 Delhi riots, caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.[127][128] Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.[129][130][131][132][133]
In 2013, the Supreme Court of India reinstated the controversial Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics, including Muslim religious leaders, stated that they supported the verdict.[134][135] BJP president Rajnath Singh said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural,[136] though the party softened the stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections.[137] The Modi government is opposed to same-sex marriage, stating in a legal affidavit that legalizing it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as ‘husband’, a biological woman as ‘wife’ and children born out of union".[138]
Economic policiesEdit
The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the Jana Sangh, it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported swadeshi (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a protectionist export policy. However, it supported internal economic liberalisation, and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress.[139] During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards globalisation. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India.[139] This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch:[139] the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its swadeshi ideology.[139]
The two NDA governments in the period 1998–2004 introduced significant deregulation and privatisation of government-owned enterprises. It also introduced tariff-reducing measures. These reforms built off of the initial economic liberalisation introduced by the P. V. Narasimha Rao-led Congress government in the early 1990s.[140] India's GDP growth increased substantially during the tenure of the NDA. The 2004 campaign slogan India Shining was based on the party's belief that the free market would bring prosperity to all sectors of society.[141] After its unexpected defeat, commentators said that it was punished for neglecting the needs of the poor and focusing too much on its corporate allies.[89][90][142]
This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years.[143] Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development.[144][145] Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.[144]
The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a neoliberal framework.[146][147] Modi liberalised India's foreign direct investment policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways.[146][148][149] Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them;[147] some of these proposals were dropped after protests.[150] The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.[147] The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers.[146] Modi has been described as taking a more economically populist approach on healthcare and agricultural policy.[151] Modi's government has also been described as taking a more protectionist turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership talks[152][153] and introducing the 2020 Atmanirbhar Bharat economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.[154][155]
Defence and counterterrorismEdit
Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism.[156][157] The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the Prevention of Terrorism Act, which later came under heavy criticism.[156][157] It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States War on Terror.[158]
Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised Pokhran-II, a series of five nuclear tests in 1998.[156] The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.[156]
The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying Kashmir territory, later known as the Kargil War.[159][160] Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.[159][160]
After the terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001, the NDA government passed the Prevention of Terrorism Act.[157] The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism.[157] It initially failed to pass in the Rajya Sabha; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a joint session of the Parliament, where the numerical superior Lok Sabha allowed the bill to pass.[157] The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism.[157] However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon civil liberties, and the National Human Rights Commission of India stated that it had been used to target Muslims.[157] It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.[161]
The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a 2015 Indian counter-insurgency operation in Myanmar against the National Socialist Council of Nagaland, the 2016 Indian Line of Control strike in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the 2019 Balakot airstrike in Pakistan.[162] It also militarily intervened in defence of Bhutan during the 2017 Doklam standoff with China.[163]
The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms.[164][165] In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War.[166] The Department of Military Affairs was also established and put under the CDS.[167]
Foreign policyEdit
The historical stance of the BJP towards foreign policy, like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on an aggressive Hindu nationalism combined with economic protectionism.[168] The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the partition of India; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate.[168] This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology.[168][169] During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of non-alignment, and instead advocated closeness to the United States.[168] In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States,[170] while stressing a desire for a more multipolar world order.[171]
The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it.[139][169] Its policy also represented a significant change from the Nehruvian idealism of previous governments, opting instead for realism.[172] His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the Delhi–Lahore Bus service.[168] Vajpayee signed the Lahore Declaration, which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests.[168] However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the 1999 Kargil War. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the Line of Control that marked the de facto border between the two countries.[168] Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak".[168] This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil Agra summit, preventing any significant deal from being reached. [168]
The Vajpayee administration also offered political support to the U.S. War on Terror, in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons.[158] However, the BJP strongly condemned the 2003 invasion of Iraq, stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq".[173] The BJP also opposed the 2011 military intervention in Libya and urged the Lok Sabha to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.[174]
The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with Nawaz Sharif's government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015.[175] Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017.[176] The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy.[177] In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared blockade on Nepal.[178] The Modi government expressed concern following the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a United Nations Security Council resolution regarding the situation there.[179][180] The Modi government remained neutral on the Russo-Ukrainian War,[181] abstaining from United Nations Security Council Resolution 2623, which condemned the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine.[182] The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.[183]
Organisation and structureEdit
The organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the president being the highest authority in the party.[107] Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term.[107] This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.[184]
Below the president is the National Executive, which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president.[107] An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.[107]
In April 2015, the BJP stated that it had more than 100 million registered members, which would make it the world's largest political party by primary membership.[185][186] As of September 2022[update], the party does not have a single Muslim representative in the parliament and state assemblies.[187][188]
The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other Sangh Parivar-related oragnisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the Sangh Parivar:[107]
- The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (All India Students' Union), the students' wing of the RSS[107]
- The Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (Indian Farmer's Union), the farmers' division[107]
- The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (Indian Labourers Union), the labour union associated with the RSS[107]
The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as:
- The BJP Mahila Morcha (BJP Women's Front), its women's division[107]
- The Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (Indian People's Youth Front), its youth wing[107]
- The BJP Minority Morcha (BJP Minority Front), its minority division[107]
In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members[189][190] as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's largest political parties.[191]
General election resultsEdit
The Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two Lok Sabha seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived.[44] In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions.[45] In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the Opposition whenever the party was not in power.[192][lower-alpha 6]
Lok Sabha seatsEdit
Year | Legislature | Party leader | Seats won | Change in seats | Percentage of votes |
Vote swing | Outcome | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1984 | 8th Lok Sabha | Atal Bihari Vajpayee | 2 / 543
|
2 | 7.74% | – | Opposition | [193] |
1989 | 9th Lok Sabha | Lal Krishna Advani | 85 / 543
|
83 | 11.36% | 3.62% | Outside support for NF | [194] |
1991 | 10th Lok Sabha | 120 / 543
|
35 | 20.11% | 8.75% | Opposition | [195] | |
1996 | 11th Lok Sabha | Atal Bihari Vajpayee | 161 / 543
|
41 | 20.29% | 0.18% | Government, later opposition | [196] |
1998 | 12th Lok Sabha | 182 / 543
|
21 | 25.59% | 5.30% | Government | [197] | |
1999 | 13th Lok Sabha | 182 / 543
|
23.75% | 1.84% | Government | [198] | ||
2004 | 14th Lok Sabha | 138 / 543
|
44 | 22.16% | 1.69% | Opposition | [199] | |
2009 | 15th Lok Sabha | Lal Krishna Advani | 116 / 543
|
22 | 18.80% | 3.36% | Opposition | [200] |
2014 | 16th Lok Sabha | Narendra Modi | 282 / 543
|
166 | 31.34% | 12.54% | Government | [201] |
2019 | 17th Lok Sabha | 303 / 543
|
21 | 37.46% | 6.12% | Government | [202][203] |
As of May 2023[update], 10 states have Chief Ministers from the BJP, and governments led by that party, sometimes including allied parties. The 10 states are Arunachal Pradesh, Assam (with Asom Gana Parishad and United People's Party Liberal), Goa, Gujarat, Haryana (with Jannayak Janta Party), Madhya Pradesh, Manipur (with Naga People's Front, National People's Party and Lok Janshakti Party), Tripura (with Indigenous People's Front of Tripura), Uttar Pradesh (with Apna Dal (Sonelal)) and Uttarakhand.
In 4 other states and in the union territory of Puducherry, it participates in the government as the junior partner in the ruling alliance with other members of the National Democratic Alliance. The states are: Maharashtra (with Shiv Sena, other small parties and independents), Meghalaya (with the National People's Party, United Democratic Party, People's Democratic Front and Hill State People's Democratic Party), Nagaland (with the Nationalist Democratic Progressive Party), and Puducherry (with the All India N.R. Congress). The BJP's ally, the Sikkim Krantikari Morcha, holds power in Sikkim, but the BJP has no ministers in the government.
The BJP has previously held power in Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Rajasthan and Jharkhand, and has been the junior coalition partner in governments in Andhra Pradesh (with the Telugu Desam Party), Jammu and Kashmir (with the Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party), Odisha (with the Biju Janata Dal), Punjab (with the Shiromani Akali Dal), and Tamil Nadu (with the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam). It has never held power in Kerala, Telangana, and West Bengal.
In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the North-East Democratic Alliance.[204][205][206]
Current seats in State Legislative AssembliesEdit
Current seats in State Legislative councilsEdit
List of prime ministersEdit
No | Portrait | Prime minister | Constituency | Term in office | Lok Sabha | Cabinet | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Start | End | Tenure | ||||||
1 | Atal Bihari Vajpayee | Lucknow | 16 May 1996 | 1 June 1996 | 6 years, 80 days | 11th | Vajpayee I | |
19 March 1998 | 22 May 2004 | 12th | Vajpayee II | |||||
13th | Vajpayee III | |||||||
2 | Narendra Modi | Varanasi | 26 May 2014 | Incumbent | 11 years, 7 days | 16th | Modi I | |
17th | Modi II |
List of deputy prime ministersEdit
No. | Portrait | Deputy PM | Term in office | Lok Sabha | Prime Minister | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Start | End | Tenure | |||||
1 | Lal Krishna Advani | 29 June 2002 | 22 May 2004 | 1 year, 328 days | 13th | Atal Bihari Vajpayee |
List of current chief ministersEdit
As of May 2022[update], 49 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 11 of whom are incumbent.
No | State | Portrait | Name | Cabinet | Governing coalition | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Arunachal Pradesh | Pema Khandu | Khandu II | BJP | ||
NPP | ||||||
2 | Assam | Himanta Biswa Sarma | Sarma | BJP | ||
AGP | ||||||
UPPL | ||||||
3 | Goa | Pramod Sawant | Sawant II | BJP | ||
MGP | ||||||
IND | ||||||
4 | Gujarat | Bhupendrabhai Patel | Patel II | BJP | ||
5 | Haryana | Manohar Lal Khattar | Khattar II | BJP | ||
JJP | ||||||
HLP | ||||||
IND | ||||||
6 | Madhya Pradesh | Shivraj Singh Chouhan | Chouhan IV | BJP | ||
IND | ||||||
7 | Manipur | N. Biren Singh | Singh II | BJP | ||
NPP | ||||||
NPF | ||||||
KPA | ||||||
IND | ||||||
8 | Tripura | Manik Saha | Saha II | BJP | ||
IPFT | ||||||
9 | Uttar Pradesh | Yogi Adityanath | Adityanath II | BJP | ||
AD(S) | ||||||
NP | ||||||
10 | Uttarakhand | Pushkar Singh Dhami | Dhami II | BJP | ||
IND |
See alsoEdit
- Leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Parliament of India
- List of political parties in India
- List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party
- List of state presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party
- Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party
- Politics of India
- List of ruling political parties by country
ReferencesEdit
Explanatory notesEdit
- ↑ in 2002
- ↑ Sharma (2019), p. 523: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."
- ↑ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: "Nehru's response [to Patel's warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."
- ↑ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
- ↑ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
- ↑ For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.
CitationsEdit
- ↑ Ananya Das (20 January 2020). "Jagat Prakash Nadda: BJP's new national president rises through the ranks, faces several challenges". Zee News. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- ↑ Gyan Varma (15 July 2019). "Meet BL Santhosh, newly appointed general secretary of BJP". live mint. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- ↑ "Bharatiya Janata Party Constitution". BJP official website. Bharatiya Janata Party. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2017. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
- ↑ "BJP announces new parliamentary committee; Modi leader in Lok Sabha, Rajnath his deputy". India Today. 12 June 2019. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- ↑ "Rajesh Agarwal gets BJP treasurer post". United News of India. 27 September 2020. Archived from the original on 17 October 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
- ↑ "What you need to know about India's BJP". AlJazeera. 23 May 2019. Archived from the original on 13 May 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 "BJP's foundation day: Brief history of the achievements and failures of the party". The Indian Express. 6 April 2019. Archived from the original on 11 May 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ "BJP Gets A New Address; Soul Of New Office Is The Party Worker, Says PM Modi". NDTV.com. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
- ↑ Siddhartha Rai (27 January 2017). "PM Modi goes cashless, buys lifetime subscription of BJP mouthpiece Kamal Sandesh through cheque". India Today. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ Sengupta, Tamal. "Bengal BJP revamps party mouthpiece before 2018 panchayet elections". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
- ↑ "Public Policy Research Centre". Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 22 July 2020.
- ↑ —Express News Service (23 May 2020). "BJP think tank offers online course in governance; babus to impart lessons". newindianexpress.com. New Delhi: The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 14 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- "BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card". dailypioneer.com. New Delhi: The Pioneer. 10 September 2019. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
Public Policy Research Center (PPRC), BJP's think tank, on Monday released a comprehensive report on 100 major decisions and initiatives taken by Modi Government in first 100 days.
- "BJP think tank releases Modi Govt's 100-day report card". dailypioneer.com. New Delhi: The Pioneer. 10 September 2019. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- ↑ "Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad is not the students' wing of BJP: Shreehari Borikar". Archived from the original on 28 February 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- ↑ "BJP youth wing launches its campaign for party's Lok Sabha poll win". Economic Times. 19 January 2019. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ "Quota for women in council of ministers among Mahila Morcha's suggestions for BJP poll manifesto". Economic Times. 5 April 2019. Archived from the original on 23 October 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ Pragya Singh (15 January 2008). "Need to Know BJP-led BMS is biggest labour union in India". live mint. Archived from the original on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ Gupta, Sejuta Das (2019e). Class, Politics, and Agricultural Policies in Post-liberalisation India. Cambridge University Press. pp. 172–173. ISBN 978-1-108-41628-3. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- ↑ * Johnson, Matthew; Garnett, Mark; Walker, David M (2017). Conservatism and Ideology. Routledge. pp. 45–50. ISBN 978-1-317-52900-2. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- Björn Goldstein (2015) The unconscious Indianization of 'Western' conservatism – is Indian conservatism a universal model?, Global Discourse, 5:1, 44-65, doi:10.1080/23269995.2014.946315
- Mazumdar, Surajit (2017). "Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India". 5 (1). Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich: 115–131. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 24 April 2022.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - Chhibber, Pradeep. K.; Verma, Rahul (2018). Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India. Oxford University Press. pp. 50–150. ISBN 978-0-190-62390-6. LCCN 2018001733. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
- ↑
- Henrik Berglund. "Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP." Economic and Political Weekly 39, no. 10 (2004): 1064–70. JSTOR 4414737.
- Chhibber, Pradeep K. "State Policy, Party Politics, and the Rise of the BJP." In Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India, 159–76. University of Michigan Press, 1999. JSTOR 10.3998/mpub.23136.12.
- ↑ * Chatterji, Angana P.; Hansen, Thomas Blom; Jaffrelot, Christophe (2019). Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India. Oxford University Press. pp. 100–130. ISBN 978-0-19-007817-1. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe, and Cynthia Schoch. "Conclusion to Part I." In Modi's India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy, 148–54. Princeton University Press, 2021. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1dc9jzx.12.
- Chhibber, Pradeep K. and Verma, Rahul (2018). Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-190-62390-6. LCCN 2018001733. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- ↑ * Mazumdar, Surajit (2017). Neo-Liberalism and the Rise of Right-Wing Conservatism in India. Germany: University Library of Munich.
- Gopalakrishnan, Shankar (7 July 2006). "Defining, Constructing and Policing a 'New India': Relationship between Neoliberalism and Hindutva". Economic & Political Weekly. 41 (26): 2803–2813. JSTOR 4418408. Archived from the original on 17 October 2020. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
- Wilson, Kalpana; Ung Loh, Jennifer; Purewal, Navtej (July 2018). "Gender, Violence and the Neoliberal State in India" (PDF). Feminist Review. 119 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1057/s41305-018-0109-8. S2CID 149814002. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- Mathur, Navdeep (2018). "The low politics of higher education: saffron branded neoliberalism and the assault on Indian universities". Critical Policy Studies. 12 (1): 121–125. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1403343. S2CID 148842457.
- ↑
- McDonnell, Duncan; Cabrera, Luis (2019). "The right-wing populism of India's Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care)". Democratization. 26 (3): 484–501. doi:10.1080/13510347.2018.1551885. S2CID 149464986.
- Özçelik, Ezgi (2019). Right-wing Populist Governments Rhetorical Framing of Economic Inequality : the Cases of BJP in India and AKP in Turkey. Koç University.
- ↑ Johnson, Matthew; Garnett, Mark; Walker, David M (2017). Conservatism and Ideology. Routledge. pp. 45–50. ISBN 978-1-317-52900-2. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
- ↑ Malik & Singh 1992, pp. 318–336; Banerjee 2005, p. 3118; BBC 2012.
- ↑ Pillalamarri, Akhilesh. "India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties — The Diplomat". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 28 February 2016.
- ↑ "Members". idu.org. International Democrat Union. Archived from the original on 23 April 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
- ↑ "International Democrat Union » Asia Pacific Democrat Union (APDU)". International Democrat Union. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 12 June 2017.
- ↑ Iwanek, Krzysztof (10 September 2018). "Paint It Saffron: The Colors of Indian Political Parties". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
- ↑ Election Commission 2013.
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 Devesh Kumar (20 May 2014). "BJP + 29 Parties = National Democratic Alliance". NDTV. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ "BJP seals alliances in Northeast, aims 22 LS seats". The Hindu Business Line. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ "Party Position pdf" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 March 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
- ↑ "Alphabetical Party Position in the Rajya Sabha". Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2019.
- ↑ "Strengthwise Party Position in the Rajya Sabha". Rajya Sabha. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017.
- ↑ "BJP gains back Madhya Pradesh in just 15 months after losing it". India Today. 26 November 2019. Archived from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
- ↑ Rajkumar. "सरकार की नीतियों को किसानों तक पहुंचाएगा बीजेपी किसान मोर्चा". m.patrika.com. Archived from the original on 19 October 2020. Retrieved 8 August 2020.
- ↑ "Facebook accused of boosting far-right BJP in Indian elections". People's World. 17 March 2022. Archived from the original on 6 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
- ↑ "In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress". The Times of India. 19 May 2016. Archived from the original on 5 November 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- ↑ "Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303". Zee News. 25 May 2019. Archived from the original on 2 June 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ Banerjee 2005, p. 3118.
- ↑ Malik & Singh 1992, p. 318.
- ↑ "Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch". Business Standard. 17 March 2019. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
- ↑ Swain 2001, p. 60.
- ↑ 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 Guha 2007, p. 633.
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 45.3 Sen 2005, pp. 251–272.
- ↑ 46.0 46.1 46.2 46.3 46.4 Bhatty, Kiran; Sundar, Nandini (17 September 2020). "Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime". International Sociology. SAGE Publications. 35 (6): 632–650. doi:10.1177/0268580920937226. ISSN 0268-5809. S2CID 224896271.
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 Hindle, Garry; Lindberg, Staffan (2020). "New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party" (PDF). V-Dem Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
- ↑ 48.0 48.1 Nazifa Alizada, Rowan Cole, Lisa Gastaldi, Sandra Grahn, Sebastian Hellmeier, Palina Kolvani, Jean Lachapelle, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Shreeya Pillai, and Staffan I. Lindberg. 2021. Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf Archived 14 September 2021 at the Wayback Machine
- ↑ Noorani 1978, p. 216.
- ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 116–119.
- ↑ 51.0 51.1 Guha 2007, p. 136.
- ↑ 52.0 52.1 Guha 2007, p. 250.
- ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 122–126, 129–130.
- ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 250, 352, 413.
- ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 427–428.
- ↑ 56.0 56.1 Guha 2007, pp. 538–540.
- ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 282–283.
- ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 292–301, 312.
- ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 301–312.
- ↑ "Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born". The Indian Express. 7 April 2020 [7 April 1980]. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 61.2 61.3 61.4 61.5 61.6 Malik & Singh 1992, pp. 318–336.
- ↑ Guha 2007, p. 579.
- ↑ Pai 1996, pp. 1170–1183.
- ↑ Jha 2003.
- ↑ Flint 2005, p. 165.
- ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 582–598.
- ↑ Guha 2007, p. 635.
- ↑ Guha 2007, p. 636.
- ↑ 69.0 69.1 69.2 69.3 69.4 69.5 69.6 Guha 2007, pp. 633–659.
- ↑ NDTV 2012.
- ↑ 71.0 71.1 71.2 71.3 Al Jazeera 2009.
- ↑ "All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case | Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it". The Hindu. 30 September 2020. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
- ↑ Sen 2005, p. 254.
- ↑ rediff.com 1998.
- ↑ Outlook 2013.
- ↑ Kattakayam 2012.
- ↑ India Today 2001.
- ↑ Tehelka 2001.
- ↑ Ghassem-Fachandi 2012, pp. 1–31.
- ↑ 80.0 80.1 Jaffrelot 2013, p. 16.
- ↑ Harris 2012.
- ↑ Krishnan 2012.
- ↑ Hindustan Times 2014.
- ↑ NDTV.com 2012.
- ↑ "Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence". India Today. 20 April 2018. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
- ↑ Brass 2005, pp. 385–393.
- ↑ Gupta 2011, p. 252.
- ↑ Nussbaum 2008, p. 2.
- ↑ 89.0 89.1 89.2 Ramesh 2004.
- ↑ 90.0 90.1 The Hindu 2004.
- ↑ Hindustan Times 2009.
- ↑ Mathew 2014.
- ↑ Deccan Chronicle 2014.
- ↑ BBC & May 2014.
- ↑ 95.0 95.1 95.2 95.3 95.4 95.5 Sridharan 2014.
- ↑ Times of India 2014.
- ↑ Diwakar 2014.
- ↑ 98.0 98.1 Varshney 2014.
- ↑ Akhtar, Rais; Kirk, William. "Jammu and Kashmir, State, India". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 20 August 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2019.
Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947.
- ↑ Osmańczyk, Edmund Jan (2003). "Jammu and Kashmir.". In Mango, Anthony (ed.). Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements. Vol. 2: G–M (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 1189. ISBN 978-0-415-93922-5. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China.
- ↑ 101.0 101.1 Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained Archived 12 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, 11 December 2019.
- ↑ 102.0 102.1 "Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019". pib.gov.in. Archived from the original on 16 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
- ↑ 103.0 103.1 103.2 103.3 Slater, Joanna (18 December 2019). "Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 18 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
- ↑ "Interview with Indira Gandhi". Interview relecast through India times. TV Eye. 18 December 2016. Archived from the original on 11 August 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
- ↑ "Recalling the Emergency years". The Indian Express. 29 June 2015. Archived from the original on 31 May 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2018.
- ↑ Hansen 1999, p. 85.
- ↑ 107.00 107.01 107.02 107.03 107.04 107.05 107.06 107.07 107.08 107.09 107.10 107.11 Swain 2001, pp. 71–104.
- ↑ 108.0 108.1 108.2 108.3 108.4 Seshia 1998, pp. 1036–1050.
- ↑ 109.0 109.1 109.2 109.3 109.4 Gillan 2002, pp. 73–95.
- ↑ 110.0 110.1 Sen 2005, p. 63.
- ↑ International Religious Freedom Report 2005.
- ↑ The Hindu 2002.
- ↑ Davies 2005.
- ↑ BBC & January 2014.
- ↑ "Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul". The Economist. 2 March 2019. Archived from the original on 1 March 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
- ↑ 116.0 116.1 Ganguly, Sumit (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead". Journal of Democracy. 25 (4): 56–60. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0077. S2CID 154421269. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 30 August 2021.
- ↑ Joshua, Anita (16 July 2014). "Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 2 December 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
- ↑ Mukul, Akshaya (18 July 2014). "Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 21 July 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
- ↑ Bhatty, Kiran (2019). "School education: Denials and delusions". In Azad, Rohit; Chakraborty, Shouvik; Ramani, Srinivasan; Sinha, Dipa (eds.). A quantum leap in the wrong direction?. ISBN 978-93-5287-618-1. OCLC 1089418969.
- ↑ "Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union". pib.gov.in. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ↑ Article 370 rendered toothless, Article 35A ceases to exist Archived 30 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine, The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.
- ↑ "The Gazette of India" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
- ↑ Ramachandran 2003.
- ↑ "Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist". ThePrint. 17 March 2021. Archived from the original on 18 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- ↑ Regan, Helen; Gupta, Swati; Khan, Omar. "India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims". CNN. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries.
- ↑ Gringlas, Sam. "India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims". NPR. Archived from the original on 15 December 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
- ↑ Ellis-Peterson, Hannah; Azizur Rahman, Shaikh (16 March 2020), "Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots", The Guardian, Delhi, archived from the original on 17 March 2020, retrieved 17 March 2020
- ↑ Gettleman, Jeffrey; Abi-Habib, Maria (1 March 2020), "In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse", The New York Times, archived from the original on 6 March 2020, retrieved 1 March 2020
- ↑ Gettleman, Jeffrey; Yasir, Sameer; Raj, Suhasini; Kumar, Hari (12 March 2020), Photographs by Loke, Atul, "'If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims", The New York Times, archived from the original on 13 March 2020, retrieved 13 March 2020
- ↑ Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (6 March 2020), "In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn", The Washington Post, archived from the original on 7 March 2020, retrieved 6 March 2020
- ↑ Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (2 March 2020), "What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India", The Washington Post, archived from the original on 3 March 2020, retrieved 15 March 2020
- ↑ "Modi slammed as death toll in New Delhi violence rises". Al Jazeera. 26 February 2020. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
- ↑ Varadarajan, Siddharth (27 February 2020). "Narendra Modi's Reckless Politics Brings Mob Rule to New Delhi". The Wire. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 19 September 2020.
- ↑ Times of India 2013.
- ↑ Buncombe 2014.
- ↑ Ramaseshan 2013.
- ↑ Business Standard 2014.
- ↑ "Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman'". The Independent. 25 February 2021. Archived from the original on 17 January 2023. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
- ↑ 139.0 139.1 139.2 139.3 139.4 Shulman 2000, pp. 365–390.
- ↑ Tiwari 2012.
- ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 710–720.
- ↑ Sen 2005, p. 70.
- ↑ Sheela Bhatt 2014.
- ↑ 144.0 144.1 Bobbio 2012, pp. 652–668.
- ↑ Jaffrelot 2013, pp. 79–95.
- ↑ 146.0 146.1 146.2 Ruparelia, Sanjay (12 January 2016). "'Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 755–775. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974. ISSN 0085-6401. S2CID 155182560.
- ↑ 147.0 147.1 147.2 Shah, Alpa; Lerche, Jens (10 October 2015). "India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion". Economic & Political Weekly. 50 (41): 33–36. Archived from the original on 28 March 2023. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
- ↑ "Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways". The Times of India. 7 August 2014. Archived from the original on 7 August 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
- ↑ Zhong, Raymond (20 November 2014). "Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough?". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 29 March 2016. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
- ↑ "Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls". The Economic Times. 14 March 2018. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 6 February 2019.
- ↑ "Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind". The Nikkei. Archived from the original on 20 August 2018. Retrieved 20 August 2018.
- ↑ "Why India opted out of world's biggest today". Times of India. 15 November 2020. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ↑ "Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa". Nikkei. 3 December 2020. Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism.
- ↑ "Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era". Financial Times. 23 November 2020. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022.
- ↑ "India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn". Bloomberg. 19 February 2020. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ↑ 156.0 156.1 156.2 156.3 Ganguly 1999, pp. 148–177.
- ↑ 157.0 157.1 157.2 157.3 157.4 157.5 157.6 Krishnan 2004, pp. 1–37.
- ↑ 158.0 158.1 Kux 2002, pp. 93–106.
- ↑ 159.0 159.1 Qadir 2002, pp. 1–10.
- ↑ 160.0 160.1 Abbas 2004, p. 173.
- ↑ Times of India 2002.
- ↑ "Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar". The Economic Times. 11 July 2018. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
- ↑ "Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered?". The Quint. 14 October 2017. Archived from the original on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
- ↑ Mukherjee, Anit (5 May 2021). "The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military". War on the Rocks. Archived from the original on 6 November 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- ↑ "BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways". The Financial Express (India). 8 April 2019. Archived from the original on 6 November 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- ↑ "Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech". India Today. 16 August 2019. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- ↑ Singh, Rahul (24 December 2019). "Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 3 October 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
- ↑ 168.0 168.1 168.2 168.3 168.4 168.5 168.6 168.7 168.8 Chaulia 2002, pp. 215–234.
- ↑ 169.0 169.1 Harris 2005, pp. 7–27.
- ↑ Inbar, Efraim (2016). US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century. Taylor & Francis. p. 155.
- ↑ "Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar". The Hindu. 19 September 2020. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ↑ Lall 2006.
- ↑ "BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War". Arab News. 5 April 2003. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- ↑ "Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs". The Hindu. 23 March 2011. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- ↑ "India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit". BBC. 25 December 2015. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ↑ "PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death". Times of India. 18 December 2020. Archived from the original on 22 December 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ↑ "The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand?". Scroll.in. 26 February 2019. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ↑ "Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade". NDTV. 15 November 2015. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 3 January 2021.
- ↑ Martin, Michael (22 November 2021). "Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta". Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
- ↑ Haidar, Suhasini (22 December 2022). "India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
- ↑ "Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers". Livemint. 10 March 2022. Archived from the original on 13 January 2023. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
- ↑ "Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China'". Hindustan Times. 26 February 2022. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- ↑ "Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions | India News – Times of India". The Times of India. 3 March 2022. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
- ↑ Times of India 2012.
- ↑ First Post 2015.
- ↑ "BJP becomes largest political party in the world", The Times of India, 30 March 2015, archived from the original on 6 December 2016
- ↑ Kuchay, Bilal (6 July 2022). "India ruling party has no Muslim MP for the first time in history". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
- ↑ Bhatnagar, Gaurav Vivek (7 July 2022). "From July 7, BJP Will Have No Muslim Representatives in Parliament, Assemblies". The Wire. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
- ↑ "BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party". Sydney Morning Herald. 16 October 2022. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
- ↑ "How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades". Times of India. 16 April 2022. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
- ↑ "Narendra Modi's Message to America". National Review. 23 June 2022. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or "Indian People's Party") is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development.
- ↑ National Informatics Centre 2014.
- ↑ Election Commission 1984.
- ↑ Election Commission 1989.
- ↑ Election Commission 1991.
- ↑ Election Commission 1996.
- ↑ Election Commission 1998.
- ↑ Election Commission 1999.
- ↑ Election Commission 2004.
- ↑ Election Commission 2009.
- ↑ Election Commission 2014.
- ↑ Kumar, Sanjay (28 May 2019). "BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 3 December 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
- ↑ "20. Performance of National Parties". Election Commission of India. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved 21 December 2020.
- ↑ Pisharoty, Sangeeta Barooah (25 May 2016). "BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt'". The Wire. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016.
- ↑ "Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance". 25 May 2016. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016.
- ↑ "BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge". Archived from the original on 25 May 2016.
General and cited sourcesEdit
- Sharma, Chetna (2019), "Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016: Continuities and contestations with special reference to politics in Assam, India", Asian Ethnicity, 20 (4): 522–540, doi:10.1080/14631369.2019.1601993, S2CID 150837053
- Sen, Uditi (2018), Citizen Refugee: Forging the Indian Nation after Partition, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-108-42561-2, archived from the original on 14 April 2023, retrieved 16 June 2020
- Jayal, Niraja Gopal (2019), "Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India", South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 42 (1): 33–50, doi:10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874, ISSN 0085-6401
- Abbas, Hassan (2004). Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-1497-1.
- "Uproar over India mosque report: Inquiry into Babri mosque's demolition in 1992 indicts opposition BJP leaders". Al Jazeera. 24 November 2009. Archived from the original on 31 January 2010. Retrieved 8 July 2014.
- Banerjee, Sumanta (22 July 2005). "Civilising the BJP". Economic & Political Weekly. 40 (29): 3116–3119. JSTOR 4416896.
- "Narendra Modi sworn in as Indian prime minister". BBC News. 26 May 2014. Archived from the original on 2 July 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
- "Indian Astrology vs Indian Science". BBC World Service. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 17 January 2014.
- Bhatt, Sheela. "What Anandiben Patel is really like". Rediff. Archived from the original on 23 June 2014. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- Bobbio, Tommaso (2012). "Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India". Third World Quarterly. 33 (4): 653–668. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.657423. S2CID 154422056. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 29 June 2019.
- Brass, Paul R. (2005). The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. University of Washington Press. pp. 385–393. ISBN 978-0-295-98506-0.
- Buncombe, Andrew (11 July 2014). "India's gay community scrambling after court decision recriminalises homosexuality". The Independent. Archived from the original on 5 September 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- "It is the govt.'s responsibility to protect LGBT rights, says Harsh Vardhan". Business Standard. Mumbai, India. 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
- Chaulia, Sreeram (June 2002). "BJP, India's Foreign Policy and the "Realist Alternative" to the Nehruvian Tradition". International Politics. 39 (2): 215–234. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ip.8897388. S2CID 144714683.
- Davies, Richard (2005). "The Cultural Background of Hindutva". In Ayres & Oldenburg, Alyssa & Philip (ed.). India Briefing; Takeoff at Last?. Asia Society.
- "Narendra Modi to be sworn in as 15th Prime Minister of India on May 26". Deccan Chronicle. 20 May 2014. Archived from the original on 27 May 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
- Diwakar, Rekha (2014). "The 16th general election in India, April–May 2014". Electoral Studies. 37: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.005.
- "General Election to Lok Sabha Trends and Results". Election Commission of India. Archived from the original on 18 December 2014. Retrieved 18 June 2014.
- "List of Political Parties and Election Symbols main Notification Dated 18 January 2013" (PDF). India: Election Commission of India. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 October 2013. Retrieved 9 May 2013.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1984 to the Eighth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1989 to the Ninth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Statistical report on general elections, 2004 to the Fourteenth Lok Sabha" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- "Performance of National Parties" (PDF). Election Commission of India. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 December 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
- Fitzgerald, Timothy (2011). Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-4411-4290-0. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
- Flint, Colin (2005). The geography of war and peace. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516208-0. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
- Ganguly, Sumit (Spring 1999). "India's Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program". International Security. 23 (4): 148–177. doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.148. JSTOR 2539297. S2CID 57565560.
- Ghassem-Fachandi, Parvis (2012). Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15177-9.
- Gillan, Michael (March 2002). "Refugees or Infiltrators? The Bharatiya Janata Party and "Illegal" Migration from Bangladesh". Asian Studies Review. 26 (1): 73–95. doi:10.1080/10357820208713331. S2CID 146522066.
- Guha, Ramachandra (2007). India after Gandhi: the history of the world's largest democracy (1st ed.). India: Picador. ISBN 978-0-330-39610-3.
- Gupta, Dipankar (2011). Justice before Reconciliation: Negotiating a 'New Normal' in Post-riot Mumbai and Ahmedabad. Routledge. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-415-61254-8.
- Halarnkar, Samar (13 June 2012). "Narendra Modi makes his move". BBC News. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
The right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), India's primary opposition party
- Hansen, Thomas (1999). The saffron wave : democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00671-0.
- Harris, Gardiner (2 July 2012). "Justice and 'a Ray of Hope' After 2002 India Riots". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
- Harris, Jerry (2005). "Emerging Third World powers: China, India and Brazil". Race & Class. 46 (7): 7–27. doi:10.1177/0306396805050014. S2CID 154768728.
- "The Meaning of Verdict 2004". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 14 May 2004. Archived from the original on 16 September 2004. Retrieved 10 December 2013.
- "Inventing History". The Hindu. 14 October 2002.
- "Modi did not incite riots: SIT". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 30 December 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- "2009 Lok Sabha election: Final results tally". Hindustan Times. 17 May 2009. Archived from the original on 11 June 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- "Tehelka sting: How Bangaru Laxman fell for the trap". India Today. Archived from the original on 14 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. ISBN 978-1-85065-301-1.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (June 2013). "Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class". Studies in Indian Politics. 1: 2–27. doi:10.1177/2321023013482789. S2CID 154404089.
- Jha, Nilanjana Bhaduri (21 February 2003). "Survey shows temple remains in Ayodhya: VHP". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- Kattakayam, Jiby (27 April 2012). "Bangaru Laxman convicted of taking bribe". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Archived from the original on 1 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- Krishnan, Jayanth (2004). "India's "Patriot Act": POTA and the Impact on Civil Liberties in the World's Largest Democracy". Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice. 22 (2): 265–300. ISSN 2767-1992. Archived from the original on 28 July 2014. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- Krishnan, Murali; Shamil Shams (11 March 2012). "Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
- Kux, Dennis (May–June 2002). "India's Fine Balance". Foreign Affairs. 81 (3): 93–106. doi:10.2307/20033165. JSTOR 20033165.
- Lall, Marie (December 2006). "Indo-Myanmar Relations in the Era of Pipeline Diplomacy". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 28 (3). doi:10.1355/CS28-3D. S2CID 154093220.
- Malik, Yogendra K.; Singh, V.B. (April 1992). "Bharatiya Janata Party: An Alternative to the Congress (I)?". Asian Survey. 32 (4): 318–336. doi:10.2307/2645149. JSTOR 2645149.
- Mathew, Liz (16 May 2014). "Narendra Modi makes election history as BJP gets majority on its own". Live Mint. Archived from the original on 27 May 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
- Naqvi, Saba; Raman, Anuradha (1 April 2013). "Their Dark Glasses". Outlook. Archived from the original on 21 December 2015. Retrieved 23 May 2015.
- "Lok Sabha at a glance". National Informatics Centre. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014. Retrieved 17 July 2014.
- "Report: Sequence of events on December 6". NDTV. Archived from the original on 26 September 2010. Retrieved 20 June 2012.
- "Naroda Patiya riots: Former minister Maya Kodnani gets 28 years in jail". NDTV.com. Archived from the original on 26 December 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
- Noorani, A. G. (March–April 1978). "Foreign Policy of the Janata Party Government". Asian Affairs. 5 (4): 216–228. doi:10.1080/00927678.1978.10554044. JSTOR 30171643.
- Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2008). The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future. Harvard University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-674-03059-6.
- Pai, Sudha (December 1996). "Transformation of the Indian Party System: The 1996 Lok Sabha Elections". Asian Survey. 36 (12): 1170–1183. doi:10.2307/2645573. JSTOR 2645573.
- Qadir, Shaukat (April 2002). "An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999" (PDF). RUSI Journal. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
- Ramachandran, Sujata (15 February 2003). "'Operation Pushback' Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi". Economic & Political Weekly. 38 (7): 637–647. JSTOR 4413218.
- Ramaseshan, Radhika (14 December 2013). "BJP comes out, vows to oppose homosexuality". The Telegraph. Calcutta, India. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 16 December 2013.
- Ramesh, Randeep (14 May 2004). "News World news Shock defeat for India's Hindu nationalists". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 10 December 2013.
- "TDP helps Vajpayee wins confidence vote". Rediff.com. Archived from the original on 2 May 2010. Retrieved 4 January 2011.
- Sen, Amartya (2005). India and the world (1. publ. ed.). Allen Lane: 2005. ISBN 978-0-7139-9687-6.
- Seshia, Shaila (November 1998). "Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party". Asian Survey. 38 (11): 1036–1050. doi:10.2307/2645684. JSTOR 2645684.
- Shulman, Stephen (September 2000). "Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration". International Studies Quarterly. 44 (3): 365–390. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00164.
- Sridharan, Eswaran (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote" (PDF). Journal of Democracy. 25 (4). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 January 2015. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
- Swain, Pratap Chandra (2001). Bharatiya Janata Party: Profile and Performance. India: APH publishing. pp. 71–104. ISBN 978-81-7648-257-8. Archived from the original on 14 April 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
- "Bangaru Laxman convicted for taking bribe". Tehelka. Archived from the original on 11 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
- "Election results 2014: India places its faith in Moditva". Timesofindia.indiatimes.com. 17 May 2014. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
- "SP condemns Vaiko's arrest under Pota". The Times of India. 13 July 2002. Archived from the original on 16 September 2012.
- "BJP amends constitution allowing Gadkari to get a second term". The Times of India. 28 September 2012. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
- "Stand with RSS, BJP". The Times of India. 20 December 2013. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
- Chatterjee, Mohua (13 July 2015). "BJP enrolls 11 crore members, launches 'Mahasampark Abhiyan'". First Post. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
- Tiwari, Aviral Kumar (March 2012). "An Error-Correction Analysis of India-Us Trade Flows". Journal of Economic Development. 37 (1).
- "India: International Religious Freedom Report". US Department of state. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
- Vajpayee, Atal Bihari (2007). Jaffrelot, Christophe (ed.). Hindu Nationalism: A Reader. Delhi: Permanent Black. ISBN 978-0-691-13098-9.
- Varshney, Ashutosh (October 2014). "Hindu Nationalism in Power?". Journal of Democracy. 25 (4): 34–45. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0071. S2CID 144608424.
Further readingEdit
- Ahuja, Gurdas M. (2004). Bharatiya Janata Party and Resurgent India. Ram Company.
- Andersen, Walter K.; Damle, Shridhar D. (1987) [Originally published by Westview Press]. The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism. Delhi: Vistaar Publications.
- Bhambhri, C.P. (2001). Bharatiya Janata Party : Periphery to Centre. Delhi: Shipra. ISBN 978-81-7541-078-7.
- Baxter, Craig (1971) [first published by University of Pennsylvania Press 1969]. The Jana Sangh — A Biography of an Indian Political Party. Oxford University Press, Bombay. ISBN 978-0-8122-7583-4.
- Chadha, Kalyani; Guha, Pallavi (2016). "The Bharatiya Janata Party's online campaign and citizen involvement in India's 2014 election". International Journal of Communication. 10. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- Ganguly, Sumit (2015). "Hindu nationalism and the foreign policy of India's Bharatiya Janata Party" (PDF). Transatlantic Academy Paper Series. 2: 1–15. ISBN 978-1-5292-0460-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
- Graham, B. D. (1990). Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and Development of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-38348-6.
- Harriss, John (2015). ["Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 712–718. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826. S2CID 147615034.
{{cite journal}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - Malik, Yogendra K.; Singh, V.B. (1994). Hindu Nationalists in India : The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-8810-6.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. ISBN 978-1-85065-301-1.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (July 2003). "Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?" (PDF). Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics: 16. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 December 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
- Jain, Varsha; B.E., Ganesh (2020). "Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders: A Case of India and Narendra Modi". Journal of Political Marketing. 19 (1–2): 15–33. doi:10.1080/15377857.2019.1652222. S2CID 202247610.
- Mishra, Madhusudan (1997). Bharatiya Janata Party and India's Foreign Policy. New Delhi: Uppal Pub. House. ISBN 978-81-85565-79-8.
- Nag, Kingshuk (2014). The Saffron Tide: The Rise of the BJP. Rupa Publications. ISBN 978-8129134295.
- Nag, Kingshuk. Atal Bihari Vajpayee (Rupa Publications, 2016).
- Palshikar, Suhas, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Lodha, eds. Electoral Politics in India: The Resurgence of the Bharatiya Janata Party (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
- Raghavan, G.N.S. New Era in the Indian Polity, A Study of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the BJP (1996).
- Sanjeev Kr, H. M. (2007). "Foreign Policy Position of Bharatiya Janata Party Towards Issues of India Pakistan Relations". The Indian Journal of Political Science. 68 (2): 275–291. JSTOR 41856327.
- Sharma, C.P. Thakur, Devendra P. (1999). India under Atal Behari Vajpayee : The BJP Era. New Delhi: UBS Publishers' Distributors. ISBN 978-81-7476-250-4.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Stein, Burton (2010). A history of India (edited by David Arnold. 2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-9509-6.
- Rao, Ramesh (2001). Coalition conundrum: the BJP's trials, tribulations, and triumphs. Har Anand. ISBN 9788124108093.
External linksEdit
- www
.bjp .org - BJP web resources provided by GovPubs at the University of Colorado Boulder Libraries
- BJP at Curlie
- Works by or about Bharatiya Janata Party at Internet Archive
- Bharatiya Janata Party at the Encyclopædia Britannica