Created by Neils51
Last edited March 27, 2026
>Neils51
m Ancient era: spelling - it's → its
 
small changes
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{EngvarB|date=September 2013}}
{{Short description|Medieval kingdom in southwest India}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2013}}
{{Distinguish|Vettom Grama Panchayath}}
{{Use Indian English|date=September 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2024}}
{{Infobox country
{{Infobox country
| native_name          = {{native name|ml|Vettathunad}}<br />{{native name|ml|Tanur Swaroopam}}<br/>{{native name|sa|Prakashabhu}}<br/>{{native name|en|Kingdom of Light}}
| native_name          = {{native name|ml|Vettathunad}}<br />{{native name|ml|Tanur Swaroopam}}<br />{{native name|sa|Prakashabhu}}<br />{{native name|en|Kingdom of Light}}
| conventional_long_name = Kingdom of Tanur
| conventional_long_name = Kingdom of Tanur
| common_name          = Tanur
| common_name          = Tanur
Line 48: Line 50:
| today                = [[Malappuram district|Malappuram]], [[Kerala]], India
| today                = [[Malappuram district|Malappuram]], [[Kerala]], India
}}
}}
{{Distinguish|Vettom Grama Panchayath}}
'''Kingdom of Tanur''' ('''Vettathunadu''', '''Vettom''', '''Tanur Swaroopam''', '''Prakashabhu''', '''Kingdom of Light''') was one of the numerous feudal [[List of feudal states of Kerala|principalities]] on Malabar Coast during the Middle Ages. It was ruled by a Hindu dynasty, claiming [[Kshatriya]] status, known as ''Tanur dynasty''. The kingdom comprised parts of the coastal Taluks of [[Tirurangadi]], [[Tirur Taluk|Tirur]], and [[Ponnani taluk]]s in present-day [[Malappuram district]] and included places such as [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]], [[Tirur|Tirur (Trikkandiyur)]] and [[Chaliyam]]. The coastal villages of [[Kadalundi]] and [[Chaliyam]] in the southernmost area of [[Kozhikode district]] was also under ''Tanur Swaroopam''.<ref name="askh"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>


The king of Vettattnad was a long time [[feudatory]] of the [[Zamorin]] of Calicut.<ref>[http://princelystatesofindia.com/Extinguished/bettut.html princelystatesofindia.com]</ref> With the arrival of the Portuguese in Malabar, the rulers of Vettathunad began to play the Portuguese and Calicut against each other. They were one of the first vassals of Calicut to stand up against the [[Samoothiri|Zamorin]] with the Portuguese assistance.<ref name="askh">Kerala History, A. Shreedhara Menon, 2007 Edition, D C Books, Kottayam</ref> [[Francis Xavier]] had visited [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]] in 1546 and visited the [[Keraladeshpuram Temple]] at [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]].<ref name="Manorama">Manorama Yearbook 1995, 1996</ref> Subsequently, a Vettom king fell in offers of the Portuguese and converted to Christianity in 1549. This king allowed the construction of the strategic fortress at [[Chaliyam]].<ref name="askh"/>
The '''Kingdom of Tanur''' (also referred to as '''Vettathunadu''', '''Vettam''', '''Tanur Swaroopam''', and '''Prakashabhu'''; or the '''Kingdom of Light''') was a feudal [[List of feudal states of Kerala|principality]] on the [[Malabar Coast]] of the Indian subcontinent during the [[Middle Ages]]. It was governed by the Tanur dynasty, a [[Hindu]] ruling family that claimed ''[[Kshatriya]]'' status. The kingdom encompassed parts of the coastal ''taluks'' of [[Tirurangadi]], [[Tirur Taluk|Tirur]], and [[Ponnani taluk|Ponnani]] in present-day [[Malappuram district]], including locations such as [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]], Tirur (historically known as Trikkandiyur) and [[Chaliyam]]. The kingdom also contained the coastal villages of [[Kadalundi]] and Chaliyam in the southernmost region of [[Kozhikode district]].<ref name="askh" /><ref name="Makhdoom" />
 
The rulers of Vettathunadu were long-standing [[feudatory|feudatories]] of the [[Zamorin]] of [[Calicut]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bettut (Vettutnaar, Vettatnad) |url=https://princelystatesofindia.com/Extinguished/bettut.html |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120316023255/http://princelystatesofindia.com/Extinguished/bettut.html |archive-date=March 16, 2012 |access-date=August 16, 2011 |website=PRINCELY STATES OF INDIA}}</ref> With the arrival of the Portuguese on the Malabar Coast, the Vettathunadu kings began to manoeuvre between the Portuguese and the Zamorin. They were among the first vassals of Calicut to stand up against the Zamorin with Portuguese support.<ref name="askh">{{Cite book |last=Menon |first=A. Sreedhara |title=A Survey Of Kerala History |publisher=DC Books |year=1967 |isbn=9788126415786 |edition=2007 |publication-date=2008}}</ref> In 1546, [[Francis Xavier]] visited Tanur and the [[Keraladeshpuram Temple]] located there.<ref name="Manorama">{{Cite book |last=M |first=Mathew K. |title=Manorama Year Book 1996 |publisher=Kottayam: Malayala Manorama |year=1996 |isbn= |edition=31nd}}</ref>  


Since, part of the Chovvaram ([[Sukapuram]]) village in the old 64 villages of [[Nambudiri]]s, the queen of [[Kingdom of Cochin|Cochin]] adopted some [[Vettom]] princes in 17th century, which lead to tensions in the Malabar Coast.<ref name="askh"/>
In 1549, a ruler of Vettathunadu{{Who?|date=January 2025}} converted to [[Christianity]] under Portuguese influence. This conversion marked a shift in the kingdom's alliance, allowing the Portuguese to construct a fortress at [[Chaliyam]].<ref name="askh" />


The royal family became extinct on the death of the last king, on 24 May 1793.<ref name="Logan">Logan, William: ''Malabār, the manual of Malabār'', p.659</ref> Subsequently, the kingdom passed to [[Malabar District|English East India Company]] and the temple of the royal family was transferred to the Zamorin of Calicut in 1842.<ref>Madras Legislative Assembly Debates. Official Report by Madras (India : State). Legislature. Legislative Assembly, p.373</ref>
In the 17th century, the Queen of [[Kingdom of Cochin|Cochin]] adopted some Vettathunadu princes. This adoption included parts of the Chovvaram ([[Sukapuram]]) village, which was one of the 64 historic villages of [[Nambudiri]]s. The adoption contributed to tensions among the regional powers and principalities.<ref name="askh"/>


The Vettathunad rulers were famous patrons of arts and learning. A Vettathunad ruler is said to have introduced innovations in ''[[Kathakali]]'' which have come to known as the ''Vettathu Sambradayam''. The famous poets [[Thunchaththu Ramanujan Ezhuthachan]], who is also known as ''The Father of Modern Malayalam'', and [[Vallathol Narayana Menon]], who is also the founder of ''[[Kerala Kalamandalam]]'',  were born in Vettathunad.<ref name="askh"/> The [[Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics]] flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. In attempting to solve astronomical problems, the Kerala school independently created a number of important mathematics concepts, including [[series expansion]] for trigonometric functions.<ref name="roy">{{cite journal |last=Roy |first=Ranjan |year=1990 |title=Discovery of the Series Formula for π by Leibniz, Gregory, and Nilakantha |journal=Mathematics Magazine |volume=63 |issue=5 |pages=291–306 |doi=10.2307/2690896 |jstor=2690896}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Pingree |first=David |author-link=David Pingree |title=Hellenophilia versus the History of Science |year=1992 |journal=Isis |volume=83 |issue=4 |pages=554–63 |jstor=234257 |doi=10.1086/356288 |quote=One example I can give you relates to the Indian Mādhava's demonstration, in about 1400&nbsp;A.D., of the infinite power series of trigonometrical functions using geometrical and algebraic arguments. When this was first described in English by Charles Whish, in the 1830s, it was heralded as the Indians' discovery of the calculus. This claim and Mādhava's achievements were ignored by Western historians, presumably at first because they could not admit that an Indian discovered the calculus, but later because no one read anymore the ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society'', in which Whish's article was published. The matter resurfaced in the 1950s, and now we have the Sanskrit texts properly edited, and we understand the clever way that Mādhava derived the series ''without'' the calculus, but many historians still find it impossible to conceive of the problem and its solution in terms of anything other than the calculus and proclaim that the calculus is what Mādhava found. In this case, the elegance and brilliance of Mādhava's mathematics are being distorted as they are buried under the current mathematical solution to a problem to which he discovered an alternate and powerful solution. |bibcode=1992Isis...83..554P|s2cid=68570164 }}</ref>
The Tanur royal family became extinct following the death of the last king on 24 May 1793.<ref name="Logan">{{Cite book |last=William |first=Logan |title=Malabar Manual |publisher=Government Press |year=1887 |volume=1 |location=Madras |pages=659}}</ref> Afterwards, the kingdom came under control of the [[Malabar District|English East India Company]]. In 1842, the temple associated with the royal family was transferred to the Zamorin of Calicut, marking the end of the kingdom's independent identity.<ref>Madras Legislative Assembly Debates. Official Report by Madras (India : State). Legislature. Legislative Assembly, p. 373</ref>


==Etymology and dominions==
The Vettathunadu rulers were renowned patrons of arts and learning. A Vettathunadu ruler is credited with introducing innovations to''[[Kathakali]],'' which have come to be known as the ''Vettathu Sambradayam'' ('Vettathu tradition'). The region was also the birthplace of the famous poets [[Thunchaththu Ramanujan Ezhuthachan]], celebrated as "the father of modern Malayalam", and [[Vallathol Narayana Menon]], the founder of [[Kerala Kalamandalam]].<ref name="askh"/>  
[[File:Colored vettattnad.jpg|thumbnail|Erstwhile ''Vettathunad'' Taluk in the [[Malabar District]] during British Rule. It was merged with [[Ponnani taluk]] in 1861, and separated from Ponnani taluk to form [[Tirur Taluk]] in 1957.]]
The name "Tanur Swaroopam (Tanni-ur Swaroopam)" is derived from three [[Malayalam language]] words. "Tanni" refers to the tree [[Terminalia bellirica|bastard myrobalan]], "Ur" refers to the "Village" and "Swaroopam" to "Kingdom".<ref name="bibliomania.com">[http://www.bibliomania.com/2/3/260/1287/20259/1/frameset.html]</ref> The kingdom was called in literary works ''Prakasa Bhu'' (''The Kingdom of Light'') and its ruler ''Prakasa Bhu Palan''.<ref name="askh"/> The king was called "raja" or "thampuran" or "[[naduvazhi]]".<ref name="askh"/>


In the time of the arrival of [[British Raj|British]], according to [[William Logan (author)|William Logan]], the kingdom ("nadu") was divided into 21 "amsoms" as shown below<ref name="ReferenceA">Logan, William: ''Malabār, the manual of Malabār''</ref>(''A main bazaar in each amsom is given in bracket'').
The [[Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics]] flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. Scholars from the school made significant advancements in addressing astronomical problems and independently developed a number of important mathematical concepts, including [[series expansion]] for trigonometric functions.<ref name="roy">{{cite journal |last=Roy |first=Ranjan |year=1990 |title=Discovery of the Series Formula for π by Leibniz, Gregory, and Nilakantha |journal=Mathematics Magazine |volume=63 |issue=5 |pages=291–306 |doi=10.2307/2690896 |jstor=2690896}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Pingree |first=David |author-link=David Pingree |title=Hellenophilia versus the History of Science |year=1992 |journal=Isis |volume=83 |issue=4 |pages=554–63 |jstor=234257 |doi=10.1086/356288 |quote=One example I can give you relates to the Indian Mādhava's demonstration, in about 1400&nbsp;A.D., of the infinite power series of trigonometrical functions using geometrical and algebraic arguments. When this was first described in English by Charles Whish, in the 1830s, it was heralded as the Indians' discovery of calculus. This claim and Mādhava's achievements were ignored by Western historians, presumably at first because they could not admit that an Indian discovered the calculus, but later because no one read the ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society'', in which Whish's article was published. The matter resurfaced in the 1950s, and now we have the Sanskrit texts properly edited, and we understand the clever way that Mādhava derived the series ''without'' the calculus, but many historians still find it impossible to conceive of the problem and its solution in terms of anything other than the calculus and proclaim that the calculus is what Mādhava found. In this case, the elegance and brilliance of Mādhava's mathematics are being distorted as they are buried under the current mathematical solution to a problem to which he discovered an alternate and powerful solution. |bibcode=1992Isis...83..554P|s2cid=68570164 }}</ref>


[[Anantavur]] (Cherulal), [[Mangalam, Tirur|Chennara]], [[Perumanna-Klari|Clari]] ([[Kuttippala]]), [[Iringavoor|Iringavur]], [[Kalpakancheri|Kalpakanchēri]] ([[Kadungathukundu]]), [[Valavannur|Kanmanam]] (Thuvvakkad), [[Mangalam, Tirur|Mangalam]], [[Melmuri|Mēlmuri]], [[Niramaruthur|Niramaruthūr]], [[Ozhur|Ozhūr]], [[Pachattiri]], Pallippuram, [[Pariyapuram|Pariyāpuram]], [[Ponmundam]] ([[Vailathoor]]), [[Purathur]], Rayiramangalam, [[Thalakkad]] ([[Pudiyangadi, Tirur|Betteth Puthiya Angadi]]), [[Tanalur|Thanalur]], Trikkandiyoor ([[Tirur]]), [[Triprangode]], and [[Vettom Grama Panchayath|Vettom]].<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
==Etymology and dominions==
[[File:Colored vettattnad.jpg|thumbnail|Erstwhile Vettathunadu Taluk in the [[Malabar District]] during British rule. It was merged with [[Ponnani taluk|Ponnani Taluk]] in 1861; it later separated to form [[Tirur Taluk]] in 1957.]]
The name ''Tanur Swaroopam'' (''Tanni-ur Swaroopam'') is derived from three words in the [[Malayalam language]]: ''tanni'' refers to the tree [[Terminalia bellirica|bastard myrobalan]], ''ur'' translates to "village", and ''swaroopam'' to "kingdom".<ref name="bibliomania.com">{{Cite web|url=http://www.bibliomania.com/2/3/260/1287/20259/1/frameset.html|title=Bibliomania: Free Online Literature and Study Guides}}</ref> In literary works, the kingdom is often referred to as ''Prakasa Bhu'' ('The Kingdom of Light'), and its ruler as ''Prakasa Bhu Palan''.<ref name="askh"/> The king of Tanur Swaroopam was addressed ''raja,'' ''thampuran'', or ''[[naduvazhi]]''.<ref name="askh"/>


During the [[British Raj|British]] arrival, the Kingdom of Tanur ('nadu') was divided into 21 administrative divisions called ''amsoms'' as documented by [[William Logan (author)|William Logan]].<ref name="ReferenceA">Logan, William: ''Malabār, the manual of Malabār''</ref> Each ''amsom'' often had a central bazaar. The divisions were as follows:<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
{{columns-list|colwidth=15em|
*[[Anantavur]] (Cherulal)
*[[Mangalam, Tirur|Chennara]]
*[[Perumanna-Klari|Clari]] ([[Kuttippala]])
*[[Iringavoor|Iringavur]]
*[[Kalpakancheri|Kalpakanchēri]] ([[Kadungathukundu]])
*[[Valavannur|Kanmanam]] (Thuvvakkad)
*[[Mangalam, Tirur|Mangalam]]
*[[Melmuri|Mēlmuri]]
*[[Niramaruthur|Niramaruthūr]]
*[[Ozhur|Ozhūr]]
*[[Pachattiri]]
*Pallippuram
*[[Pariyapuram|Pariyāpuram]]
*[[Ponmundam]] ([[Vailathoor]])
*[[Purathur]]
*Rayiramangalam
*[[Thalakkad]] ([[Pudiyangadi, Tirur|Betteth Puthiya Angadi]])
*[[Tanalur|Thanalur]]
*Trikkandiyoor ([[Tirur]])
*[[Triprangode]]
*[[Vettom Grama Panchayath|Vettom]]
}}
==Political history==
==Political history==
===Ancient era===
===Ancient history===
[[File:Periplous of the Erythraean Sea.svg|thumbnail|Names, routes and locations of the ''[[Periplus of the Erythraean Sea]]'' (1st century CE)]]
[[File:Periplous of the Erythraean Sea.svg|thumbnail|Names, routes, and locations of the ''[[Periplus of the Erythraean Sea]]'' (1st century CE)]]
The ancient port of [[Tyndis]] which was located on the northern side of [[Muziris]], as mentioned in the ''[[Periplus of the Erythraean Sea]]'', was somewhere around [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]].<ref name="Kerala">{{cite book|author=Menon, A. Sreedhara |title=A Survey of Kerala History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FVsw35oEBv4C|year=2007|publisher=DC Books|isbn=9788126415786}}</ref> Its exact location is a matter of dispute.<ref name="Kerala"/> The suggested locations are [[Ponnani]], [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]], [[Beypore]]-[[Chaliyam]]-[[Kadalundi]]-[[Vallikkunnu]], and [[Koyilandy]].<ref name="Kerala"/> Note that [[Ponnani]] was the southern end of the kingdom of Tanur, while [[Beypore]]-[[Chaliyam]]-[[Kadalundi]]-[[Vallikkunnu]] region was at the northern end of ''Vettathunadu''. Tyndis was a major center of trade, next only to [[Muziris]], between the Cheras and the [[Roman Empire]].<ref>Coastal Histories: Society and Ecology in Pre-modern India, Yogesh Sharma, Primus Books 2010</ref> [[Pliny the Elder]] (1st century CE) states that the port of ''[[Tyndis]]'' was located at the northwestern border of ''Keprobotos'' ([[Chera dynasty]]).<ref name=":2">Gurukkal, R., & Whittaker, D. (2001). In search of Muziris. ''Journal of Roman Archaeology,'' ''14'', 334–350.</ref> The [[North Malabar]] region, which lies north of the port at ''[[Tyndis]]'', was ruled by the kingdom of [[Ezhimala]] during [[Sangam period]].<ref name="Malabar">A. Shreedhara Menon, A Survey of Kerala History</ref> According to the ''[[Periplus of the Erythraean Sea]]'', a region known as ''[[Limyrike]]'' began at ''[[Kannur|Naura]]'' and ''[[Tyndis]]''. However the [[Ptolemy]] mentions only ''[[Tyndis]]'' as the ''[[Limyrike]]'''s starting point. The region probably ended at [[Kanyakumari]]; it thus roughly corresponds to the present-day [[Malabar Coast]]. The value of Rome's annual trade with the region was estimated at around 50,000,000 [[sesterces]].<ref>According to [[Pliny the Elder]], goods from India were sold in the Empire at 100 times their original purchase price. See [https://web.archive.org/web/20131106031753/http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/BookLibrary/books/bibliographie/P/Plinyelder/elder/pliny-india.html]</ref> [[Pliny the Elder]] mentioned that ''[[Limyrike]]'' was  prone by pirates.<ref>Bostock, John (1855). "26 (Voyages to India)". Pliny the Elder, The Natural History. London: Taylor and Francis. </ref> The [[Cosmas Indicopleustes]] mentioned that the ''[[Limyrike]]'' was a source of peppers.<ref>Indicopleustes, Cosmas (1897). Christian Topography. 11. United Kingdom: The Tertullian Project. pp. 358–373. </ref><ref>Das, Santosh Kumar (2006). The Economic History of Ancient India. Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd. p. 301. </ref>
The ancient port of [[Tyndis]], mentioned in the ''[[Periplus of the Erythraean Sea]],'' was located on the northern side of [[Muziris]] and is believed to have been situated near [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]].<ref name="Kerala">{{cite book|author=Menon, A. Sreedhara |title=A Survey of Kerala History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FVsw35oEBv4C|year=2007|publisher=DC Books|isbn=9788126415786}}</ref> The exact location of Tyndis remains disputed, with suggested sites at [[Ponnani]], [[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]], [[Beypore]][[Chaliyam]][[Kadalundi]][[Vallikkunnu]], and [[Koyilandy]].<ref name="Kerala"/> Notably, Ponnani marked the southern boundary of the kingdom of Tanur, while the Beypore–Chaliyam–Kadalundi–Vallikkunnu region was at its northern end. Tyndis was a major trade hub, second only to Muziris, facilitating trade between the [[Chera dynasty|Cheras dynasty]] and the [[Roman Empire]].<ref>Coastal Histories: Society and Ecology in Pre-modern India, Yogesh Sharma, Primus Books 2010</ref>


===Before the advent of the Portuguese===
[[Pliny the Elder]], writing in the 1st century CE, noted that the port of Tyndis was located at the northwestern border of ''Keprobotos'' (Chera dynasty).<ref name=":2">Gurukkal, R., & Whittaker, D. (2001). In search of Muziris. ''Journal of Roman Archaeology,'' ''14'', 334–350.</ref> During the [[Sangam period]], the [[North Malabar]] region, lying north of the port at Tyndis, was ruled by the kingdom of [[Ezhimala]].<ref name="Malabar">A. Shreedhara Menon, A Survey of Kerala History</ref> According to the ''Periplus of the Erythraean Sea'', the region known as ''[[Limyrike]]'' began at [[Kannur|Naura]] and Tyndis. However, [[Ptolemy]] identified only ''Tyndis'' as the ''Limyrike'''s starting point. ''Limyrike'' likely extended to [[Kanyakumari]], corresponding approximately to the present-day Malabar Coast. The annual value of trade between Rome and this region has been estimated at around 50,000,000 [[sesterces]].<ref>According to [[Pliny the Elder]], goods from India were sold in the Empire at 100 times their original purchase price. See [https://web.archive.org/web/20131106031753/http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/BookLibrary/books/bibliographie/P/Plinyelder/elder/pliny-india.html]</ref> Pliny the Elder also mentioned that ''Limyrike'' was prone to attacks by pirates.<ref>Bostock, John (1855). "26 (Voyages to India)". Pliny the Elder, The Natural History. London: Taylor and Francis.</ref> [[Cosmas Indicopleustes]] identified it as a key source of peppers.<ref>Indicopleustes, Cosmas (1897). Christian Topography. 11. United Kingdom: The Tertullian Project. pp. 358–373.</ref><ref>Das, Santosh Kumar (2006). The Economic History of Ancient India. Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd. p. 301.</ref>
The history of Vettathunad before the arrival of the Portuguese Armadas is largely obscure.<ref name="askh"/> The origin of the dynasty is often dates back to the Chera times in legendary traditions.<ref name="askh"/> The [[Chera Kingdom]] was disintegrated in the early 12th century.<ref name="askh"/> Most of their Nair governors and vassals proclaimed independence during this period of extreme instability.<ref name="askh"/>


[[File:Vasco da Gama perante o Samorim de Calecute.png|350 px|thumb|[[Vasco da gama]] and Manavikraman [[Zamorin]] by [[Veloso Salgado]] (1864–1945)]]
===Pre-Portuguese history===
The early history of Vettathunadu, prior to the arrival of the Portuguese armadas, remains largely obscure.<ref name="askh" /> According to legendary traditions, the origin of the dynasty is often dated back to the Chera period.<ref name="askh" /> The [[Chera Kingdom]] began to disintegrate in the early 12th century.<ref name="askh" /> During the following period of instability, most of the Chera lands were taken over by newly arrived [[Namboothri|Namboothris]] and [[Nair]] chieftains, who defeated the Tamil governors and vassals of the Chera administration. Many of these local rulers proclaimed independence.<ref name="askh" />


The ruler of Vettam was one of the earliest Nair chiefteen in Malabar to acknowledge the suzerainty of the [[Zamorin]] of Calicut over them.<ref name="askh"/> The neighbouring states of [[Parappanad]] and [[Beypore]] also became vassals of Calicut one by one.<ref name="askh"/> Calicut annexed these regions probably in between 1340 and 1350 AD.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info">[http://c-radhakrishnan.info/ Welcome to the home page of C. Radhakrishnan, Malayalam novelist and Author]</ref> The very significant fact is that, the major purpose of this conquest was not the expansion of land, but for capturing strategical ports and acquiring fertile paddy fields of the [[Bharathappuzha]] river valley.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info"/> Even as the royal houses of [[Parappanad]], [[Kingdom of Valluvanad|Valluvanad]], and Vettathunad, rapidly achieve commercial prosperity as a result of geographical access to maritime commerce, [[Eranad]] literally suffocates from being cut off from the access to the [[Arabian Sea]].<ref name="askh"/> And the land north of the Nila river valley was not so fertile in paddy production. The Zamorin himself prepared and attended a post-occupation coronation function of the Vettathunad king.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info" /> No other feudatory under Zamorins was seen conducting such a function. This may be viewed as the Zamorin’s strategy to establish his supremacy on the ports, Nila river system and its valley.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info" />
[[File:Vasco da Gama perante o Samorim de Calecute.png|350 px|thumb|[[Vasco da Gama]] and Manavikraman [[Zamorin]] by [[Veloso Salgado]] (1864–1945)]]


The second in line successors of Zamorin, the Eralpads, controlled the banks of river Nila as a governor after the occupation of the territory once belonged to Vettattnad and other principalities.<ref name="askh"/> In the following [[Thirunavaya War]]s between the Cochin-Valluvanad alliance and Calicut, the rulers of Vettattnad supported the Zamorin.<ref name="askh"/> As the [[Thirunavaya]] was captured after the war, [[Zamorin]] proclaimed himself as ''Protector'' and took over sole right of conducting the famous [[Mamankam festival]].<ref name="askh"/> During the Mamankam festivals all his feudatories including the Vettam king were used to send flags to Thirunavaya as a symbol of regard to the Zamorin.<ref name="askh"/>
The ruler of Vettathunadu was among the earliest Nair chieftains in Malabar to acknowledge the suzerainty of the [[Zamorin]] of Calicut.<ref name="askh"/> The neighbouring states of [[Parappanad]] and [[Beypore]] also became vassals of the Zamorin.<ref name="askh"/> Calicut annexed these regions probably between 1340 and 1350 AD.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info">[http://c-radhakrishnan.info/ Welcome to the home page of C. Radhakrishnan, Malayalam novelist and Author]</ref> The primary objective of these conquests was not territorial expansion but rather control of strategic ports and the fertile paddy fields of the [[Bharathappuzha]] (Nila) river valley.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info"/> While regions like Parappanad, [[Kingdom of Valluvanad|Valluvanad]], and Vettathunadu prospered due to their geographical advantage in maritime trade, the inland [[Eranad]] region suffered from limited access to the [[Arabian Sea]] and less fertile lands for paddy cultivation.<ref name="askh"/> Following the annexation the Zamorin himself prepared and attended a coronation function of the Vettathunadu king.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info" /> This was a unique occurrence, as no other vassal state under the Zamorin received such attention. This may be interpreted as the Zamorin's strategy to solidify his authority over the parts, the Bharathappuzha river system, and its fertile valley.<ref name="c-radhakrishnan.info" />


* In the Mamankam festivals the king of Vettam had the right to stand on the right of Zamorin of Calicut whereas the Shah Bandar Koya of Calicut stood in his left side.<ref>Malayala Manorama daily from Malayala Manorama group, India</ref>
The successors of the Zamorin, known as the Eralpads, governed the banks of the Bharathappuzha river after the annexation of territories formerly belonging to Vettathunadu and neighbouring principalities.<ref name="askh"/> During the [[Thirunavaya War]]s, fought between the Cochin–Valluvanad alliance and Calicut, the rulers of Vettathunadu supported the Zamorin.<ref name="askh"/> Following the capture of [[Thirunavaya]], the Zamorin declared himself ''Protector'' and assumed the sole right to conduct the famous [[Mamankam festival]].<ref name="askh"/> As part of their allegiance, all feudatories, including the Vettathunadu king, were required to send flags to Thirunavaya during the festival as a symbol of respect for the Zamorin.<ref name="askh"/> During the Mamankam festival, the king of Vettathunadu held the right to stand on the right of the Zamorin of Calicut, while the Shah Bandar Koya of Calicut stood on the Zamorin's left.<ref>Malayala Manorama daily from Malayala Manorama group, India</ref>


* After the puberty ceremony (the thirandu-kalyanam) of the Zamorin princess (Thampurati), the Zamorin himself selects a suitable husband for his "anathiraval". They were generally chosen, for political and strategic reasons from the dynasties of Vettom, Berypore, Kurumburanad and Kodungallur<ref name="asi.nic.in">http://asi.nic.in/asi_books/3379.pdf</ref>
After the puberty ceremony (''thirandu-kalyanam'') of the Zamorin princess (''Thampurati''), the Zamorin selected a suitable husband for his "anathiraval". They were generally chosen, for political and strategic reasons from the dynasties of Vettam, Berypore, Kurumburanad, and Kodungallur.<ref name="asi.nic.in">{{Cite web |url=http://asi.nic.in/asi_books/3379.pdf |title=The Zamorins of Calicut |access-date=12 October 2010 |archive-date=1 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120301184904/http://asi.nic.in/asi_books/3379.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>


* As a part of the coronation ceremonies (the Ari-yittu-vazhcha) of a new Zamorin, after the death of his uncle, he enters the pulakuli pond hand in hand with the raja Punnattur. Till, 1793, Vettom king has also taken part in this ceremony, Punnattur king taking his hold of his left hand and Vettatt of the right.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>
As the coronation ceremonies (''Ari-yittu-vazhcha'') of a new Zamorin, held after the death of his uncle, included a ritual where the Zamorin entered the ''pulakuli'' pond hand-in-hand with the ''raja'' of Punnattur. Until 1793, the Vettathunadu king also participated in the ceremony, holding the Zamorin's right hand, with the Punnattur king holding his left.<ref name="asi.nic.in" /> The lord of [[Kalpakanchery]] (a region within Vettathunadu) was also present during the coronation of a new Zamorin.<ref name="asi.nic.in" />


* The lord of [[Kalpakanchery]] (Kalpakancheri was in Vettathunad) was used present at the coronation of a new Zamorin.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>
===Portuguese arrival===
[[File:1652 Sanson Map of India - Geographicus - India-sanson-1652.jpg|thumbnail|Map of India from 1652 ([[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]] was a major port town on [[Malabar Coast]])]]{{Excessive detail|section|date=January 2025}}
The rulers of Tanur aligned with the Portuguese during the 16th and 17th centuries.


===In the Portuguese era===
The Portuguese Armada, led by [[Vasco da Gama]], first landed in Malabar in 1498. However, the Zamorin of Calicut soon expelled the Portuguese from his territories. The Portuguese quickly found local allies among some of the city-states on the Malabar Coast, such as Cochin, [[Kannur|Cannanore]], and Quilon. The ruler of Tanur (''Vettathuraja''), who was partially subject to the Zamorin at the time, also seized this opportunity to break away.<ref name="bibliomania.com" /> Like the kings of Beypore and Chaliyam ([[Parappanad]]), he secretly opposed the policies of the Zamorin regarding the Kingdom of Cochin.<ref name="asi.nic.in" /> Despite these alliances with the Portuguese, the Tanur forces under the king fought for the Zamorin in the [[Battle of Cochin (1504)|Battle of Cochin]] (1504).<ref name="ReferenceA" />
[[File:1652 Sanson Map of India - Geographicus - India-sanson-1652.jpg|thumbnail|An 1652 Map of India ([[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]] was a major port town on [[Malabar Coast]])]]
The rulers of [[Tanur, India|Tanur]] were the allies of the Portuguese in 16th and 17th centuries. The famous Portuguese Armada led by [[Vasco da Gama]] landed in Malabar in 1498. Soon, the [[Zamorin]] of Calicut expelled the Portuguese from his capital and territories. The Portuguese quickly found local allies among some of the city-states on the Malabar coast which had long grated under Zamorin's dominance. Cochin, [[Kannur|Cannanore]] and Quilon opened their ports and invited the Portuguese sailors. Vettathuraja, who was in a partial subjection to the Calicut at the time, also saw an opportunity to break away.<ref name="bibliomania.com"/> Moreover, he, like the kings of [[Beypore]] and Chalium ([[Parappanad]]) secretly opposed the policy of the Zamorin over the Kingdom of Cochin.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> However, the Tanur forces under the king fought for the Zamorin of Calicut in the [[Battle of Cochin (1504)]]<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


====The Defection of Tanur====
====The Defection of Tanur====
After the Raid on [[Kodungallur|Cranganore]], in October 1504, [[Lopo Soares de Albergaria]] of the [[6th Portuguese India Armada (Albergaria, 1504)|Sixth Indian Armada of the Portuguese]] received reports of an urgent message from the Vettathuraja. The Vettathuraja had come to loggerheads with his overlord, the Zamorin of Calicut, and offered to place him under Portuguese suzerainty instead, in return for military assistance.<ref name="askh"/> He reports that a Calicut column, led by the Zamorin himself, had been assembled in a hurry to try to save Cranganore from the Portuguese, but that he managed to block its passage at [[Tanur, India|Tanur]]. Lopo Soares immediately dispatches Pêro Rafael with a [[caravel]] and a sizeable Portuguese armed force to assist Tanur.<ref name="askh"/> The Zamorin's column is defeated and dispersed soon after its arrival.
After the raid on [[Kodungallur|Cranganore]] in October 1504, [[Lopo Soares de Albergaria]], commander of the [[6th Portuguese India Armada (Albergaria, 1504)|Sixth Portuguese Indian Armada]], received an urgent appeal from the ruler of Tanur. The Vettathuraja, in conflict with his overlord, the Zamorin of Calicut, offered to submit Portuguese suzerainty in exchange for military assistance.<ref name="askh"/> The Vettathuraja reported that a Calicut column, personally led by the Zamorin, had been hastily assembled to counter the Portuguese hold on Cranganore. However, the forces of Tanur managed to block the Zamorin's passage at Tanur. Responding to his request, Lopo Soares dispatched Pêro Rafael with a [[caravel]] and a sizeable Portuguese armed contingent to aid Tanur.<ref name="askh"/> The combined forces defeated and dispersed Zamorin's column upon its arrival.


[[File:Lopo Soares de Albergaria, in Livro de Lisuarte de Abreu.jpg|right|thumb|Governor Lopo Soares de Albergaria, in ''Livro de Lisuarte de Abreu'']]
[[File:Lopo Soares de Albergaria, in Livro de Lisuarte de Abreu.jpg|right|thumb|Governor Lopo Soares de Albergaria, in ''Livro de Lisuarte de Abreu'']]


The Raid on Cranganore and the Defection of Tanur were serious setbacks to the Zamorin, pushing the frontline north and effectively placing the [[Vembanad]] lagoon out of the Zamorin's reach. Any hopes the Zamorin had of quickly resuming his attempts to capture Cochin via the backwaters are effectively dashed.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> No less importantly, the battles at Cranganore and Tanur, which involved significant numbers of Malabari captains and troops, clearly demonstrated that the Zamorin was no longer feared in the region. The [[Battle of Cochin (1504)|Battle of Cochin]] had broken his authority. Cranganore and Vettathunad showed that Malabaris were no longer afraid of defying his authority and taking up arms against him. A new chapter was being opened on the Malabar Coast.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>
The raid on Cranganore and the defection of Tanur dealt serious blows to the Zamorin, pushing the frontline northward and placing the [[Vembanad]] lagoon out of the Zamorin's reach. The loss dashed any immediate hopes the Zamorin had of resuming his attempts to capture Cochin via the backwaters.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> Equally devastating were the battles at Cranganore and Tanur, involving significant numbers of Malabari captains and troops, which exposed the waning authority of the Zamorin.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>
 
On 31 December 1504, setting out from Cochin, the [[6th Portuguese India Armada (Albergaria, 1504)|Sixth India Armada of the Portuguese]] under the command of [[Lopo Soares de Albergaria]] first headed north, intending to dock briefly at the port of [[Ponnani]], to pay his respects to his new ally, the king of Vettom.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> While negotiating entry at the port, Lopo Soares received a message, and it led him to the Battle of Pandarane (Koyilandi). However in the same year king of Vettom invited the Portuguese to his kingdom, and small Portuguese force actually came to Vettom.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> But the king as not bold enough for an open defiance, and he sent his new allies back with numerous presents and a promise of secret support against the Zamorin.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>
 
Barbosa (1516) describes:<ref name="bibliomania.com"/>
 
''“Further on … are two places of Moors (Mappilas) 5 leagues from one another. One is called Paravanor, and the other Tanor, and inland from these towns is a lord (Vettathuraja) to whom they belong; and he (Vettathuraja) has many Nairs, and sometimes he rebels against the King of Calicut (Samoothiri). In these towns there is much shipping and trade, for these Moors is great merchants”''
 
Correa (1521) was very interested in the Kingdom, as he says:<ref name="bibliomania.com"/>


''”…and the lord of Tanor (Vettathuraja), who carried on a great sea-trade with many ships, which trafficked all about the coast of India with passes from our (Portuguese) Governors, for he only dealt in wares of the country; and thus he was the greatest possible friend of the Portuguese, and those who went to his dwelling were entertained with the greatest honour, as if they had been his brothers. In fact for this purpose he kept houses fitted up, and both cots and bed-steads furnished in our fashion, with tables and chairs and casks of wine, with which he regaled our people, giving them entertainments and banquets, insomuch that it seemed as if he were going to become a Christian…”''
On 31 December 1504, commander Lopo Soares de Albergaria set out from Cochin with plans to dock briefly at the port of [[Ponnani]] to pay respects to his newly aligned ally, the king of Vettam.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> During the negotiations for entry at the port, Lopo Soares received a message that redirected him to the [[Battle of Pandarane]] (modern-day [[Koyilandy|Koyilandi]]). Later in 1505, the king of Vettam invited a small Portuguese force to his kingdom.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> Despite a growing alliance with the Portuguese, the king hesitated to openly defy the Zamorin. Instead, he sent the Portuguese back with numerous presents and a pledge of secret support against the Zamorin.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>


However, the allegiance of the Muslim merchants in the region still resided with the Zamorin of Calicut.<ref name="Makhdoom">{{cite book
Describing the kingdom, Barbosa (1516) says:<ref name="bibliomania.com"/><blockquote>Further on … are two places of Moors (Mappilas) 5 leagues from one another. One is called Paravanor, and the other Tanor, and inland from these towns is a lord (Vettathuraja) to whom they belong; and he (Vettathuraja) has many Nairs, and sometimes he rebels against the King of Calicut (Samoothiri). In these towns, there is much shipping and trade, for these Moors is great merchants.</blockquote>Correa (1521) praises the kingdom's hospitality, saying:<ref name="bibliomania.com" /><blockquote>…and the lord of Tanor (Vettathuraja), who carried on a great sea-trade with many ships, which trafficked all about the coast of India with passes from our (Portuguese) Governors, for he only dealt in wares of the country; and thus he was the greatest possible friend of the Portuguese, and those who went to his dwelling were entertained with the greatest honour, as if they had been his brothers. In fact, for this purpose he kept houses fitted up, and both cots and bed-steads furnished in our fashion, with tables and chairs and casks of wine, with which he regaled our people, giving them entertainments and banquets, insomuch that it seemed as if he were going to become a Christian…</blockquote>Muslim merchants in the region remained steadfastly allied with the Zamorin of Calicut.<ref name="Makhdoom">{{cite book |author=Nainar |first=S. Muhammad Hussain |url=https://archive.org/details/Tuhfat-al-MujahidinAnHistoricalWorkInTheArabicLanguage |title=Tuhfat-al-Mujahidin: An Historical Work in The Arabic Language |publisher=University of Madras |year=1942 |isbn=9781458985552}}</ref> In 1523, a bold merchant from Tanur demonstrated his loyalty by sailing a fleet of 8 ships and 40 boats from Calicut to the Red Sea before the eyes of the Portuguese viceroy Duarte de Menezes.<ref name="Makhdoom" /> At the time, Portuguese power in the region was too weak to respond to such actions. Following the death of the Portuguese viceroy Vasco da Gama in December 1524, tensions escalated.<ref name="Makhdoom" /> Shortly thereafter, some 100 ships, with the support of Zamorin, attacked Jewish and Christian settlements in [[Kodungallur|Kodungallūr]].<ref name="Makhdoom" /> This attacking [[Moplah]] party included men from Tānūr and Chāliyam.<ref name="Makhdoom" />
| author = S. Muhammad Hussain Nainar | year=1942
| title= Tuhfat-al-Mujahidin: An Historical Work in The Arabic Language | publisher=University of Madras
| url= https://archive.org/details/Tuhfat-al-MujahidinAnHistoricalWorkInTheArabicLanguage
}}</ref> It was a brave Tānūr merchant who sailed his 8 ships and 40 boats before the eyes of the Portuguese viceroy Duarte de Menezes from Calicut to the Red Sea in 1523.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> At that time, the Portuguese were very weak in the region to react. The Portuguese viceroy Vasco da Gama died in December 1524.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> Soon after, some 100 ships, with the support of Zamorin, attacked the Jewish and Christian settlements in Kodungallūr.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> This attacking Moplah party included men from Tānūr and Chāliyam.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>


In 1528, when a Portuguese ship was wrecked off his coast, the king of Vettom gave shelter to crew and refused to surrender them to the Zamorin.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/> But, Tohfut-ul-Mujahideen says that the ship was a French:
In 1528, a ship was wrecked off the coast of Vettam, and the king of Vettam provided shelter to the crew, refusing to surrender them to the Zamorin.<ref name="asi.nic.in" /> Some sources indicate that the ship belonged to Portugal. However, the Tohfut-ul-Mujahideen identifies the ship as French:<blockquote>And in the year (A.H.) 935, a ship belonging to the Franks was wrecked off Tanur. Now the Ray of that place affording aid to the crew, the Zamorin sent a messenger to him demanding of him the surrender of the Franks who composed it, together with such parts of the cargo of the ship as had been saved, but that chieftain having refused compliance with this demand, a treaty of peace was entered into with the Franks by him; and from this time the subjects of the Ray of Tanur traded under the protection of the passes of the Franks.<ref name="Makhdoom" /></blockquote>Then, envoys of [[Nuno da Cunha]]<ref name="asi.nic.in" /> entered into a successful intrigue with the king of Vettam (the same king to be converted to Christianity later) to make a fort on the north bank of the Bharathappuzha river, opposite of Ponnāni town. However, the Portuguese were not successful as the ships bringing building materials were destroyed when trying to cross the dangerous river mouth during a storm.<ref name="asi.nic.in" />


"And in the year (A.H.) 935, a ship belonging to the Franks was wrecked off Tanoor. Now the Ray of that place affording aid to the crew, the Zamorin sent a messenger to him demanding of him the surrender of the Franks who composed it, together with such parts of the cargo of the ship as had been saved, but that chieftain having refused compliance with this demand, a treaty of peace was entered into with the Franks by him; and from this time the subjects of the Ray of Tanoor traded under the protection of the passes of the Franks."<ref name="Makhdoom"/>
In 1529, being joined by six brigantines and a galley, with 100 chosen men commanded by Christopher de Melo, the united squadron of Lope Vaz de Sampayo took a very large ship laden with pepper in the river Chale, though defended by numerous artillery and 800 men.<ref>[http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00generallinks/kerr/vol06chap01sect07.html Columbia Educational on-line].</ref><ref name="Makhdoom" />{{Excessive detail inline|date=January 2025}}
 
Then, [[Nuno da Cunha]]<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>'s envoys entered into a successful intrigue with king of Vettam (the same king to be converted Christianity later) to make a fort near Ponnāni River ([[Bharathappuzha]]), in the opposite bank (north) of Ponnāni town. However the Portuguese were not successful as the ships bringing building materials were destroyed when trying to cross the dangerous river mouth and a storm.<ref name="asi.nic.in"/>
 
In 1529 being joined by six brigantines and a galley, with 100 chosen men, commanded by Christopher de Melo, the united squadron of Lope Vaz de Sampayo took a very large ship laden with pepper in the river Chale, though defended by numerous artillery and 800 men.<ref>[http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00generallinks/kerr/vol06chap01sect07.html Columbia Educational on-line].</ref><ref name="Makhdoom"/>


====Battles at Chaliyam Fort====
====Battles at Chaliyam Fort====
Line 132: Line 142:
| date      = 1538-40, 1571
| date      = 1538-40, 1571
| place      = [[Chaliyam]], India
| place      = [[Chaliyam]], India
| result    = Victory of [[Zamorin]] of Calicut, destruction of Chaliya,m fort
| result    = Victory of [[Zamorin]] of Calicut, destruction of Chaliyam fort
| combatant1 = {{flagicon image|Flag Portugal (1495).svg}} Portuguese Empire<br>[[Tanur, Malappuram]]<br>[[Chaliyam]]
| combatant1 = {{flagicon image|Flag Portugal (1495).svg}} Portuguese Empire<br />[[Tanur, Malappuram]]<br />[[Chaliyam]]
| combatant2 = [[Saamoothiri|Zamorin of Calicut]]<br>[[Mappila]]s from [[Ponnani]], Punur, [[Tanur, India|Tanur]] and [[Parappanangadi]]
| combatant2 = [[Saamoothiri|Zamorin of Calicut]]<br />[[Malabar Muslims|Mappila]]s from [[Ponnani]], Punur, [[Tanur, India|Tanur]] and [[Parappanangadi]]
| commander1 = Athed (?)
| commander1 = Athed (?)
| commander2 = Zamorin of Calicut <br> Pattu Kunnhāli (Kunnhāli Marakkār III)
| commander2 = Zamorin of Calicut <br /> Pattu Kunnhāli (Kunnhāli Marakkār III)
| campaignbox = {{Portuguese battles in the Indian Ocean}}
| campaignbox =  
}}
}}
{{Portuguese colonial campaigns}}
{{Portuguese colonial campaigns}}
[[File:From a map by Emanuel Bowen, 1744.jpg|thumb|South India from a map by Emanuel Bowen, an English map engraver. Note that in the map, only Vettathunad is shown with a separate boundary within the Kingdom of Samoothiri]]
[[File:From a map by Emanuel Bowen, 1744.jpg|thumb|South India from a map by Emanuel Bowen, an English map engraver. Note that in the map, only Vettathunadu is shown with a separate boundary within the Kingdom of Samoothiri.]]
The strategic Chaliyam -also known as ''Challe''- was a Portuguese garrison between 1531–1571.<ref>[http://www.colonialvoyage.com/cochin.html Portuguese India: History of Portuguese Cochin, Cannanore, Quilon. Malabar (Kerala)]</ref> Chāliyam was a strategic site, for it was only 10&nbsp;km south of Calicut and was situated in a river that falls into the sea about three leagues from Calicut, which is navigable by boats all the way to the foot of the Ghat mountains.<ref name="columbia.edu"/>
Chāliyam (also known as Chale) was a strategic Portuguese garrison between 1531 and 1571.<ref>[http://www.colonialvoyage.com/cochin.html Portuguese India: History of Portuguese Cochin, Cannanore, Quilon. Malabar (Kerala)]</ref> Only 10&nbsp;km south of Calicut, it was situated on a river that falls into the sea about three leagues from Calicut, and which is navigable by boats all the way to the foot of the Ghat mountains.<ref name="columbia.edu"/>


In 1531, the same 'to be converted' Vettam king enabled<ref name="ReferenceB">Panikkassery, Velayudhan. MM Publications (2007), Kottayam India</ref> the construction of an important Portuguese fort in Chāliyam island as a part of a peace treaty between the Zamorin and the Portuguese viceroy (the governor-general) [[Nuno da Cunha]].<ref name="columbia.edu">http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00generallinks/kerr/vol06chap01sect07.html</ref> Being perplexed by the great losses the Samoothiri was continually sustaining through the Portuguese superiority at sea, so he made overtures towards an accommodation and under Nuno da Cunha the Portuguese were retaining their lost supremacy.  
In 1531, the 'Christian convert' Vettam king{{Who?|date=January 2025}} permitted<ref name="ReferenceB">Panikkassery, Velayudhan. MM Publications (2007), Kottayam India</ref> the construction of a Portuguese fort on Chaliyam island as a part of a peace treaty between the Zamorin ([[Samoothiri]]) and the Portuguese viceroy (the governor-general) [[Nuno da Cunha]].<ref name="columbia.edu">{{Cite book |last1=Kerr |first1=Robert |author-link1=Robert Kerr (writer) |title=General History and Collection of Voyages and Travels, Arranged in Systemic Order: Forming a Complete History of the Origin and Progress of Navigation, Discovery, and Commerce, by Sea and Land, from the Earliest Ages to the Present Time. |last2=Edin |first2=F.A.S. |date=1811–1820 |volume=6 |chapter=Chapter 1, Section 7: Continuation of the Portuguese Transactions in India, from 1526 to 1538 |chapter-url=https://franpritchett.com/00generallinks/kerr/vol06chap01sect07.html}}</ref> Perplexed by his great losses continually sustained due to the Portuguese superiority at sea, the Samoothiri made overtures towards an accommodation and under Nuno da Cunha the Portuguese began retaining their lost supremacy.<ref name="columbia.edu"/> At this time, Chaliyam was controlled by the [[Parappanad]] raja named Urinama.<ref name="columbia.edu"/> Like the Vettathuraja, he also helped the Portuguese. These two kings were anxious to throw off their subjection to the Samoothiri and to ally with the Portuguese in hopes of becoming rich by participating in their trade.
<ref name="columbia.edu"/>
Chalium was controlled by the [[Parappanad]] raja (aka king of Chalium) called ''Urinama''.<ref name="columbia.edu"/> Like the Vettathuraja he also helped the Portuguese. Parappanaduraja and Vettathuraja were anxious to throw off their subjection to the Samoothiri and to enter into alliance with the Portuguese, in hopes of becoming rich by participating in their trade.


Immediately upon procuring the consent of the Zamorin to construct the fort, Nuno da Cunha set out from Goa with 150 sail of vessels, in which were 3000 Portuguese troops and 1000 native Lascarines. So much diligence was used in carrying on the work, even the gentlemen participating in the labour, that in twenty-six days it was in a defensible situation, being surrounded by a rampart nine feet thick and of sufficient height, strengthened by towers and bastions or bulwarks at proper places.<ref name="columbia.edu"/> It's said that the Portuguese destroyed a nearby mosque and used its stones to build the fort! The rectangular shaped fort was built to decline the Arab sea trade in the region. In 1532 with the help of the king of Vettam a chapel was built at Chaliyam, together with a house for the commander, barracks for the soldiers, and store-houses for trade. Diego de Pereira, who had negotiated the treaty with the Zamorin, was left in command of this new fortress, with a garrison of 250 men; and Manuel de Sousa had orders to secure its safety by sea, with a squadron of twenty-two vessels.<ref name="columbia.edu"/>
Immediately upon procuring the consent of the Zamorin to construct the fort, Nuno da Cunha set out from Goa with 150 sail of vessels, in which were 3,000 Portuguese troops and 1,000 native Lascarines. So much diligence was used in carrying on the work—with even the gentlemen participating in the labour—that in twenty-six days it was in a defensible situation, being surrounded by a rampart nine feet thick and of sufficient height, strengthened by towers, bastions, and bulwarks.<ref name="columbia.edu"/> The rectangular-shaped fort was built to decline the Arab sea trade in the region. In 1532 with the help of the king of Vettam, a chapel was built at Chaliyam, together with a house for the commander, barracks for the soldiers, and storehouses for trade. The Portuguese captain Diego de Pereira, who had negotiated the treaty with the Zamorin, was left in command of this new fortress, with a garrison of 250 men; and Manuel de Sousa had orders to secure its safety by sea, with a squadron of twenty-two vessels.<ref name="columbia.edu"/>


The Samoothiri soon repented of having allowed this fort to be built in his dominions, and used ineffectual endeavours to induce the Parappanatturaja, Caramanlii (King of [[Beypore]]?) (Some records say that Vettathuraja was also with them<ref name="columbia.edu"/>) to break with the Portuguese, even going to war against them.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>
The Samoothiri soon regretted allowing this fort to be built in his dominions, and endeavoured ineffectually to induce the rebellious kings—the Parappanatturaja, the Caramanlii (King of [[Beypore]]?), and by some records the Vettathuraja<ref name="columbia.edu"/>—to break with the Portuguese, even going to war against them.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>


====Samoothiri's first attempt (1538–40)====
====Samoothiri's first attempt (1538–1540)====
But within seven years, in 1538, the Zamorin attacked Vettattnād and Chāliyam ([[Parappanad]]). The king of Parappanād made an unconditional peace with Zamorin.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> The king of Vettam, after a protracted fight, was compelled to surrender some of his lands near Ponnāni and Chāliyam island.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> But Portuguese fort could not be destroyed. The Zamorin now had his absolute control over the area around the fort.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> Only by 1540, the Zamorin entered into an agreement with the Portuguese and stopped the war. But the skirmishes continued in the seas by Moplah navigators based at Ponnāni.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>
Within seven years, the Zamorin attacked Vettam and Chāliyam (Parappanad) in 1538. The king of Parappanād made unconditional peace with the Zamorin.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> The king of Vettam, after a protracted fight, was compelled to surrender some of his lands near Ponnāni and Chāliyam island;<ref name="Makhdoom"/> however, the Portuguese fort could not be destroyed. The Zamorin now had absolute control over the area around the fort.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> By 1540, the Zamorin entered into an agreement with the Portuguese and stopped the war, but skirmishes continued in the seas by Moplah navigators based at Ponnāni.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>


====Conversion of Vettathuraja====
====Conversion of Vettathuraja====
From 1545, the Vettathuraja banked on the Portuguese to help him solidify his position vis-à-vis the Samoothiri.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> In his experience in dealing with the Portuguese, he presumed that converting to Christianity was the way to express his political alliance and client relationship. Vettathuraja announced to the Portuguese religious specialists that his conversion had to remain secret in order not to lose his honour or his Caste. In fact, it was his close political (and religious ties) to the Portuguese that may have brought him certain disadvantages on the complicated checkerboard of power relations on the Malabar Coast.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> Jesuit records claim that the Vettathuraja thus played his own double game with the Portuguese and with the other rival little (and bigger) kings in the region. The Vettathuraja demanded to preserve after conversion certain external signs of his caste, such as the Poonul, as well as other Hindu customs. The unanimous opinion of the ecclesiastics in Goa was that such dissimulation went against the decisions of the Church Fathers. The theologians in Goa were puzzled and undecided about the question as to whether or not to permit Vettathuraja to continue wearing, the external signs of a Brahman.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>
From 1545, the Vettathuraja banked on the Portuguese to help him solidify his position vis-à-vis the Samoothiri.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> In his experience in dealing with the Portuguese, he presumed that converting to Christianity was the way to express his political alliance and client relationship. The Vettathuraja announced to the Portuguese religious specialists that his conversion had to remain secret in order not to lose his honour or his Caste. In fact, it was his close political (and religious ties) to the Portuguese that may have brought him certain disadvantages on the complicated checkerboard of power relations on the Malabar Coast.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> Jesuit records claim that the Vettathuraja thus played his own double game with the Portuguese and rival regional kings. The Vettathuraja demanded to preserve after conversion certain external signs of his caste, such as the ''Poonul'', as well as other Hindu customs. The unanimous opinion of the ecclesiastics in Goa was that such dissimulation went against the decisions of the Church Fathers. The theologians in Goa were puzzled and undecided about the question as to whether or not to permit Vettathuraja to continue wearing the external signs of a Brahman.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>


An urgent ad hoc Consultation headed by the Governor, [[Jorge Cabral]], debated this issue and drafted some of the first typically accommodationist propositions. It was the Bishop, Juan de Albuquerque, who furnished Biblical examples on behalf of such accommodating practices.<ref>http://www.calicutdiocese.com/Chronicler.doc</ref><ref>http://www.ineszupanov.com/publications/zupanov%20JEMH%202005.pdf</ref>
An urgent ad hoc consultation headed by Governor [[Jorge Cabral]] debated this issue and drafted some of the first typically accommodationist propositions. It was the bishop, Juan de Albuquerque, who furnished Biblical examples on behalf of such accommodating practices.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.calicutdiocese.com/Chronicler.doc |title=Diocese of Calicut Malabar Mission: 1498-1923 |access-date=24 September 2010 |archive-date=1 June 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100601091409/http://www.calicutdiocese.com/Chronicler.doc |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.ineszupanov.com/publications/zupanov%20JEMH%202005.pdf |title='One civility, but multiple religions': Jesuit mission among St. Thomas christians in India (16TH-17TH centuries) |access-date=28 September 2010 |archive-date=13 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110713030146/http://www.ineszupanov.com/publications/zupanov%20JEMH%202005.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
[[File:Xavier f map of voyages asia.PNG|thumb|left|350px|Voyages of St. Francis Xavier]]
[[File:Xavier f map of voyages asia.PNG|thumb|left|350px|Voyages of St. Francis Xavier]]
[[Tanur, India|Tanur]] ( Tanore or Banor) town was one of the oldest Portuguese settlements in Kerala. In 1546, [[Saint Francis Xavier]] visited Tanur.<ref name="askh"/><ref name="Manorama"/>
[[Tanur, Malappuram|Tanur]] town was one of the oldest Portuguese settlements in Kerala. In 1546, [[Saint Francis Xavier]] visited Tanur.<ref name="askh"/><ref name="Manorama"/>


In 1549 the King of Vettam fell in the offers of the Portuguese and officially converted to Christianity.<ref name="askh"/> The conversion took place in Goa in a festive mood led by Jesuit padre named António Gomes. António Gomes was a Catholic missionary arrived from Goa in October 1548. The offer was to make him the king of Kērala by defeating the Zamorin. The poor king believed them. At the time, the choice to convert Vettathuraja whose tiny realm was jammed between Samoothiri to the north, mostly hostile to Portuguese, and the fortress of Chaliyam guarded by Portuguese Captain Diego de Pereira and a handful of soldiers appeared both practical and providential. Jesuit records says that Vettathuraja himself begged to be converted and asked for a Christian priest to reside in [[Tanur, India|Tanur]].<ref name="Makhdoom"/> After the conversion, he was called Dom João. Vettathuraja was not permitted in Goa. After various spectacular or secret negotiations, confinements and escapes, Vettathuraja did finally visit Goa in October 1549. He received a sumptuous and ostentatious reception. He was paraded in procession through Goa, accompanied by various musical instruments such as trombetas, kettledrums and shawms, artillery discharges, from church bells, Vettathuraja was dressed up by the Portuguese as they felt fitting for the king.<ref name="askh"/>
In 1549 the King of Vettam fell in the offers of the Portuguese and officially converted to Christianity.<ref name="askh"/> The conversion took place in Goa in a festive mood led by a Jesuit padre named António Gomes. Gomes was a Catholic missionary who arrived from Goa in October 1548. The offer was to make him the king of Kērala by defeating the Zamorin. The poor king believed them. At the time, the choice to convert the Vettathuraja—whose tiny realm was jammed between Samoothiri to the north, mostly hostile to Portuguese, and the fortress of Chaliyam, guarded by Portuguese soldiers—appeared both practical and providential. Jesuit records says that Vettathuraja himself begged to be converted and asked for a Christian priest to reside in Tanur.<ref name="Makhdoom"/>


That is, as a Portuguese fidalgo, ''“in honourable and rich clothes, with a very rich sword fastened [around the waist], with a rich dagger, one golden chain, black velvet slippers, a black velvet hat with a printed design"''.<ref name="Logan"/>
After the conversion, he was called Dom João. Vettathuraja was not permitted in Goa. After various spectacular or secret negotiations, confinements and escapes, Vettathuraja did finally visit Goa in October 1549. He received a sumptuous and ostentatious reception. He was paraded in procession through Goa, accompanied by various musical instruments such as trombetas, kettledrums and shawms, as well as artillery discharges and church bells; Vettathuraja was dressed up by the Portuguese as they felt fitting for the king:<ref name="askh" /> "in honourable and rich clothes, with a very rich sword fastened [around the waist], with a rich dagger, one golden chain, black velvet slippers, a black velvet hat with a printed design".<ref name="Logan"/>


But, a few days after, the king returned to Hinduism saying he did not have any gain. Once he regained his kingdom loaded with Portuguese gifts, Vettathuraja doffed his Portuguese clothes and in the long run disappointed the Governor, Jorge Cabral and the Jesuits. It was the politics of pepper that undid his friendship with the Portuguese. On 21 February 1550, Cabral wrote to the king of Portugal Dom João III doubting that Vettathuraja converted sincerely, ''“Jesuits who had so much confidence in conversion of Vettathuraja confess that they were deceived, but by caution, I have to dissemble with him"''. In addition, he cautioned that ''“the conversion to Christianity might produce "discord" between the Samoothiri and Kochi and endanger the regular procurement of pepper in Kerala"''.<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>
But, a few days after, the king returned to Hinduism saying he did not have any gain. Once he regained his kingdom loaded with Portuguese gifts, Vettathuraja doffed his Portuguese clothes and in the long run disappointed Governor Cabral and the Jesuits. It was the politics of pepper that undid his friendship with the Portuguese. On 21 February 1550, Cabral wrote to the king of Portugal Dom João III doubting that Vettathuraja converted sincerely: "Jesuits who had so much confidence in conversion of Vettathuraja confess that they were deceived, but by caution, I have to dissemble with him". In addition, he cautioned that "the conversion to Christianity might produce 'discord' between the Samoothiri and Kochi and endanger the regular procurement of pepper in Kerala".<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>


In fact, the Fourth Pepper War broke out sometime before June (1550) over a disputed territory—the island of Varutela—between the King of Kochi and the king of Vadakkumkur. A series of bloody encounters ensued and the Samoothiri allied with the Vettathuraja on the side of the king of Vadakkumkur were opposed to the King of Kochi and the Portuguese.<ref name="askh"/> After negotiations, rendered even more complicated by the appointment of the new Portuguese Viceroy, Dom Affonso de Noronha, the conflict remained unsettled and the amuck runners of the deceased King of Vadakkumkur wreaked havoc in the town of Kochi. Consequently, the cargo of pepper was not sent to Lisbon until the late February 1551.<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>
In fact, the Fourth Pepper War broke out sometime before June 1550 over a disputed territory—the island of Varutela—between the King of Kochi and the king of Vadakkumkur. A series of bloody encounters ensued and the Samoothiri allied with the Vettathuraja on the side of the king of Vadakkumkur, who was opposed to the King of Kochi and the Portuguese.<ref name="askh"/> After negotiations, rendered even more complicated by the appointment of the new Portuguese viceroy, Dom Affonso de Noronha, the conflict remained unsettled and the amuck runners of the deceased King of Vadakkumkur wreaked havoc in the town of Kochi. Consequently, the cargo of pepper was not sent to Lisbon until late February 1551.<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>


Roughly from April until September 1549, Gomes partly resided in Tanur, and partly travelled southwards along the Malabar Coast. He had been officially sent by the bishop, Juan de Albuquerque, to instruct the Vettathuraja reputed to have been secretly converted to Christianity the previous year (1548).<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>
Roughly from April until September 1549, Gomes partly resided in Tanur, and partly travelled southwards along the Malabar Coast. He had been officially sent by the bishop, Juan de Albuquerque, to instruct the Vettathuraja reputed to have been secretly converted to Christianity the previous year.<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/> By this time, the situation had somewhat changed: the Vettathuraja was secretly converted by the vicar in Chaliyam, João Soares, and the Franciscan Frey Vicente de Lagos, who gave the neophyte a metal crucifix to hang onto a thread, "hidden on his chest".<ref name="Logan" /><ref name="Makhdoom" />


By 1549, the situation had somewhat changed, the Vettathuraja was secretly converted by the vicar in Chaliyam, João Soares, and the Franciscan Frey Vicente de Lagos, who gave the neophyte a metal crucifix to hang onto his thread, "hidden on his chest".<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>
Gomes was allowed to build the church in Tanur, to baptise the Vettathuraja's wife as Dona Maria, and to perform Christian marriage rites for the kingly couple—all this was done in secret (''ocultamente'').


And while all went just fine for António Gomes who was allowed to build the church in the town, to baptise the Vettathuraja’s wife as Dona Maria, and to perform Christian marriage rites for the kingly couple—all this was done in secret, "ocultamente".
When Lopo Soares arrived at Cochin (1553) after his victory over the Samoothiri, the Vettathuraja sent him a complaint against the Samoothiri, begging for peace and help against the Samoothiri.<ref name="bibliomania.com" /> In 1569 and 1570 there were again wars between the Portuguese and Zamorin's forces at Chāliyam fort. In these wars the notorious Moplah dacoit Kutti Pōker died fighting the Portuguese at Chāliyam fort.<ref name="Logan" /><ref name="Makhdoom" />


When Lopo Soares arrived at Cochin (1553) after his victory over the Samoothiri the Vettathuraja sent a complain to him against the Samoothiri by ambassadors, begging for peace and help against the Samoothiri, having fallen out with him for reasons that touched the service of the King of Portugal.<ref name="bibliomania.com"/>
====Samoothiri's second attempt (1571)====
In 1571, the Zamorin got a fresh chance against the Portuguese. With help from nearby [[Moplah|Moplahs]], he began besieging Chāliyam fort.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> The Moplah admiral Pattu Kunnhāli (''Kunnhāli Marakkār III'') led the navy of the Zamorin in the siege. Moplahs from Ponnani, Punur, Tanur, and Parappanangadi were in the fleet.


In 1569 and 1570 there were again wars with the Portuguese and Zamorin's forces at Chāliyam fort. In these wars the notorious Moplah dacoit Kutti Pōker lost his life in his fight against the Portuguese at Chāliyam fort.<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="Makhdoom"/>
The Zamorin spent great amount of money in the siege. The seizing force dug many trenches around the fortress. At the end of the two months of siege, the Zamorin himself came to Chaliyam from Ponnani and began to command. The Portuguese were starving inside the garrison, since food sent from Cochin and [[Kannur|Cannanore]] was being blocked.<ref name="ReferenceA" />


====Samoothiri's second attempt (1571)====
After two months of siege, on the midnight of 15 September 1571, the Portuguese led by Athed surrendered to the alliance.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> They agreed empty the fortress on the condition that no one will be harmed. The Vettam king escorted the Portuguese in their return journey to Tanur. Then they were sent to Cochin.
In 1571, the Zamorin got a fresh chance against the Portuguese. He began a siege to capture the Chāliyam fort with help of the Moplahs from the surroundings on Sufur 14 or 15 of that year.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> The Moplah admiral Pattu Kunnhāli (''Kunnhāli Marakkār III'') led the navy of the Zamorin in the siege. Moplahs from Ponnani, Punur, [[Tanur, India|Tanur]], Parappanangadi were in the fleet. The Portuguese lost the war. Many of their soldiers died inside the fortress. The seizing force had dug many trenches around the fortress. The Zamorin spent great amount of money in the siege. At the end of the two months of siege, Zamorin himself came to Chalium from Ponnani and began to command. The Portuguese were starving inside the garrison. The food materials sent from Cochin and [[Kannur|Cannanore]] were blocked long before it reached.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


After two months of siege, on the midnight of 15 September 1571, the Portuguese led by Athed surrendered to the alliance.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> They agreed empty the fortress on the condition that no one will be harmed. The Vettam king had to escort the Portuguese in their return journey to Tanur. Then they were sent to Cochin. It was too late for the backup from Goa.
The Zamorin destroyed the fort and the chapel—it has been his greatest problem ever since its construction in 1531.<ref name="Makhdoom" /> He sent most of the debris to Calicut and he gave the land to build a new mosque.<ref name="Makhdoom" /> As earlier decided, he gave Kottaparamba and the surrounding areas to the king of Parappanād, his ally in the siege.<ref name="ReferenceA" />


The Zamorin destroyed the fort and the chapel leaving not one stone upon another which was his greatest problem ever since its construction in 1531.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> He sent most of the debris to Calicut and he gave that portion of land to build a new mosque.<ref name="Makhdoom"/> And Zamorin gave Kottaparamba and surrounding areas, as earlier decided, to the king of Parappanād (aka king of Chalium), his ally in the siege.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
Antonio Fernandes de Chaliyam (Chale) held an important command under Portuguese generals, and was raised to the dignity of a [[knight]] of the military [[Order of Christ (Portugal)|Order of Christ]]. He was a convert from Chaliyam. Killed in action in 1571, Antonio Fernandes received a state funeral at Goa.{{Citation needed|date=September 2023}}{{Relevant inline|date=January 2025}}
 
Antonio Fernandes de Chalium (Chale) held an important command under Portuguese generals, and was raised to the dignity of a [[Knight]] of the military [[Order of Christ (Portugal)|Order of Christ]]. He was a convert from Chalium (Chale). Killed in action in 1571, Antonio Fernandes received a state funeral at Goa.<ref>[http://historicalleys.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2010-12-18T08:23:00-08:00&max-results=1 Historic Alleys]</ref>


The Portuguese sailors burned Chāliyam town in 1572 as revenge.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
The Portuguese sailors burned Chāliyam town in 1572 as revenge.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


===Post-Portuguese history===
===Post-Portuguese history===
By 17th century, the Portuguese authority on the Malabar coast significantly reduced with emergence of the Dutch. Soon the small principalities in the region became puppets in the hands of the two Colonial powers and fought each other.<ref name="Logan"/>
By the 17th century, the Portuguese authority on the Malabar Coast significantly reduced with the emergence of the Dutch. Soon the small principalities in the region became puppets in the hands of the two colonial powers and fought each other.<ref name="Logan"/><ref name="askh"/> In 1658 the crown of [[Kingdom of Cochin|Cochin]] became vacant and five princes from the Tānūr and [[Aroor]] dynasties were adopted to the palace by the regent of Cochin, Queen Gangādhara Lakshmi (1656–1658), and were given the right to succeed. This regent queen was under the influence of the Portuguese, and later the eldest member of the adoptees from Tanur, Rama Varma (1658–1662), was crowned. This incidence of adoption is mentioned in some of the local folk tales. However, Henric Vanrid has stated that the number of adoptions as four. Two of the five adopted were from Tanur, but there is no hint of how many people were adopted from Aroor and what happened to them later. Nonetheless, nine of them survived to be kings.<ref name="Logan"/>
<ref name="askh"/> In 1658 the crown of [[Kingdom of Cochin|Cochin]] became vacant and five princes from Tānūr dynasty and [[Aroor|Aroor dynasty]] were adopted to the palace by the regent of Cochin, Queen Gangādhara Lakshmi (1656–1658), and were given the right to succeed. This regent Queen was under the influence of the Portuguese and later the eldest member of the adoptees from [[Tanur, India|Tanur]], Rama Varma (1658–1662), was crowned. This incidence of adoption is mentioned in some of the local folk tales. But Henric Vanrid has stated that the number of adoptions as four. Two of the five adopted were from Tanur, but there is no hint of how many people were adopted from Aroor and what happened to them later. But, nine of them survived to be kings.<ref name="Logan"/>


[[File:Codacal Tile Factory.jpg|250px|thumb|Codacal Tile Factory was ran by the ''Commonwealth Trust'' at Codacal. The Tile Factory at Codacal, started in 1887, is the second tile manufacturing industry in India.]]
[[File:Codacal Tile Factory.jpg|250px|thumb|Codacal Tile Factory was run by the ''Commonwealth Trust'' at Codacal. Started in 1887, it was the second tile manufacturing industry in India.]]
[[File:Tirur Railway Station name board.jpg|250px|thumbnail|[[Tirur Railway Station]], the oldest Railway Station of [[Kerala]], opened in 1861]]
[[File:Tirur Railway Station name board.jpg|250px|thumbnail|[[Tirur railway station]], the oldest railway station of [[Kerala]], opened in 1861]]


But, an elder branch (mūtta tāvazhi) of the [[Cochin Royal Family|Cochin dynasty]] itself ignored that adoptions and appealed to the [[Zamorin]] of Calicut for help. The leader of the elder branch was the dispossessed prince Vīra Kērala Varma. The Zamorin decided to help the elder branch and Āditya Varma, king of Vadakkumkūr, king of [[Edappally]] and [[Paliath Achan|chief of Pāliyam]] rallied around the Zamorin in support of the elder branch's dispossessed prince.<ref name="askh"/> The king of [[Purakkad]] supported the ruling Tānūr princes. On the advice of the chief of Pāliyam, the dispossessed prince set sail to Colombo in Ceylon and asked help from the Dutch governor, [[Joan Maetsuycker]], against the Portuguese-supported ruling princes. Later he sought exile in Colombo. The Dutch now found a huge chance of getting a major say in the politics of Malabar.<ref name="askh"/> In 1661, the Dutch led the allies of the dispossessed prince, with the armies of Zamorin of Calicut, against the Portuguese and the ruling Cochin king (Tānūr adoptee). The city of Cochin was attacked and the battle resulted in a disastrous failure of the Portuguese and Cochin rulers. Three of the Tānūr princes including Rama Varma killed in the war, Rani Gangadharalakshmi was sent to prison and the ruling king escaped to Eranākulam where he was given refuge by the king of Purakkad. After the death of Rama Varma and the other adopted prince Goda Varma (1662–1663), only survivor from Tanur, was crowned. On 7 January 1663, the Dutch attacked Cochin Port again and the prince surrendered to the Dutch. Vīra Kērala Varma (1663–1687) later crowned as the king of Cochin by the Dutch.<ref name="askh"/>
However, an elder branch (''mūtta tāvazhi'') of the [[Cochin royal family|Cochin dynasty]] itself ignored the adoptions and appealed to the [[Zamorin]] of Calicut for help. The leader of the elder branch was the dispossessed prince Vīra Kērala Varma. The Zamorin decided to help the elder branch and Āditya Varma, king of Vadakkumkūr, king of [[Edappally]] and [[Paliath Achan|ruler of Pāliyam]] rallied around the Zamorin in support of the elder branch's dispossessed prince.<ref name="askh"/> The king of [[Purakkad]] supported the ruling Tānūr princes. On the advice of the chief of Pāliyam, the dispossessed prince set sail to Colombo in Ceylon and asked help from the Dutch governor, [[Joan Maetsuycker]], against the Portuguese-supported ruling princes. Later he sought exile in Colombo. The Dutch now found a huge chance of getting a major say in the politics of Malabar.<ref name="askh"/> In 1661, the Dutch led the allies of the dispossessed prince, with the armies of Zamorin of Calicut, against the Portuguese and the ruling Cochin king (Tānūr adoptee). The city of Cochin was attacked and the battle resulted in a disastrous failure of the Portuguese and Cochin rulers. Three of the Tānūr princes including Rama Varma killed in the war, Rani Gangadharalakshmi was sent to prison and the ruling king escaped to Eranākulam where he was given refuge by the king of Purakkad. After the death of Rama Varma and the other adopted prince Goda Varma (1662–1663), only survivor from Tanur, was crowned. On 7 January 1663, the Dutch attacked Cochin Port again and the prince surrendered to the Dutch. Vīra Kērala Varma (1663–1687) later crowned as the king of Cochin by the Dutch.<ref name="askh"/>


With the eclipse of the Portuguese influence in Malabar, Kingdom of Tanur reduced into the status of one of the numerous petty states in the region.<ref name="askh"/> In the 18th century, Kingdom of Mysore expanded their territory to the Malabar Coast and Tanur royal family lost many of its members during the invasion of Mysore. By the [[treaty of Seringapatam]] Mysore ceded Malabar to the [[English East India Company]]. On 14 August 1792, a minister of Tanur took over the kingdom for his king from the East India Company.<ref name="askh"/> By the death of the Vettom king on 24 May 1793 the Tanur dynasty came to an end.<ref name="Logan"/> That was the time when the Joint Commissioners were doing the revenue settlements of the kingdom as the beginning of the British occupation in Malabār. Since there is no heir to the throne, the British took over the rule again and soon absorbed Tanur to the newly formed [[Malabar District]].<ref name="Logan"/> The temple of the Tanur royal family was transferred to the Zamorin of Calicut in 1842.<ref name="Logan"/>
With the eclipse of the Portuguese influence in Malabar, the Kingdom of Tanur was reduced in status to one of the numerous petty states in the region.<ref name="askh"/> In the 18th century, the Kingdom of Mysore expanded its territory to the Malabar Coast; the Tanur royal family lost many of its members during the invasion of Mysore. By the [[treaty of Seringapatam]], Mysore ceded Malabar to the [[English East India Company]]. On 14 August 1792, a minister of Tanur took over the kingdom for his king from the East India Company.<ref name="askh"/> With the death of the Vettam king on 24 May 1793, the Tanur dynasty came to an end.<ref name="Logan"/> At the time, Joint Commissioners were carrying out revenue settlements of the kingdom as the beginning of the British occupation in Malabār. Since there was no heir to the throne, the British took over the rule again and soon absorbed Tanur into the newly formed [[Malabar District]].<ref name="Logan"/> The temple of the Tanur royal family was transferred to the Zamorin of Calicut in 1842.<ref name="Logan"/>


==Ponnani Canal==
==Ponnani Canal==
Ponnani Canal was constructed for the transportation of goods from [[Ponnani]] to [[Tirur]] Railway Station. Here is a description about the Ponnani Canal by [[Basel Mission]] employees at Codacal.<ref>[http://www.ineszupanov.com Website of Ines Zupanov]</ref>
The Ponnani Canal was constructed for the transportation of goods from [[Ponnani]] to the [[Tirur]] railway station. [[Basel Mission]] employees at Codacal mentioned the Ponnani Canal, saying:<ref>[http://www.ineszupanov.com Website of Ines Zupanov]</ref><blockquote><nowiki>''...nowadays a steamship travels between Ponani and Tirur through the Canal, where the most convenient railway station for Ponnani is to be found. The ticket costs only 4 annas, although the distance is 10 km...''</nowiki></blockquote>
 
{{cquote|''...nowadays a steamship travels between Ponani and Tirur through the Canal, where the most convenient railway station for Ponnani is to be found. The ticket costs only 4 annas, although the distance is 10 km...''}}


==Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics==
==Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics==
{{main article|Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics}}
{{main|Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics}}
The [[Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics]] flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. In attempting to solve astronomical problems, the Kerala school independently created a number of important mathematics concepts, including [[series expansion]] for trigonometric functions.<ref name="roy"/> Their work, completed two centuries before the invention of [[calculus]] in Europe, provided what is now considered the first example of a [[power series]] (apart from geometric series).<ref>{{Harv|Stillwell|2004|p=173}}</ref> However, they did not formulate a systematic theory of [[derivative|differentiation]] and [[integral|integration]], nor is there any direct evidence of their results being transmitted outside [[Kerala]].<ref>{{Harv|Bressoud|2002|p=12}} Quote: "There is no evidence that the Indian work on series was known beyond India, or even outside Kerala, until the nineteenth century. Gold and Pingree assert [4] that by the time these series were rediscovered in Europe, they had, for all practical purposes, been lost to India. The expansions of the sine, cosine, and arc tangent had been passed down through several generations of disciples, but they remained sterile observations for which no one could find much use."</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Plofker|2001|p=293}} Quote: "It is not unusual to encounter in discussions of Indian mathematics such assertions as that "the concept of differentiation was understood [in India] from the time of Manjula (... in the 10th century)" [Joseph 1991, 300], or that "we may consider Madhava to have been the founder of mathematical analysis" (Joseph 1991, 293), or that Bhaskara II may claim to be "the precursor of Newton and Leibniz in the discovery of the principle of the differential calculus" (Bag 1979, 294). ... The points of resemblance, particularly between early European calculus and the Keralese work on power series, have even inspired suggestions of a possible transmission of mathematical ideas from the Malabar coast in or after the 15th century to the Latin scholarly world (e.g., in (Bag 1979, 285)). ... It should be borne in mind, however, that such an emphasis on the similarity of Sanskrit (or Malayalam) and Latin mathematics risks diminishing our ability fully to see and comprehend the former. To speak of the Indian "discovery of the principle of the differential calculus" somewhat obscures the fact that Indian techniques for expressing changes in the Sine by means of the Cosine or vice versa, as in the examples we have seen, remained within that specific trigonometric context. The differential "principle" was not generalized to arbitrary functions—in fact, the explicit notion of an arbitrary function, not to mention that of its
The [[Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics]] flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. In attempting to solve astronomical problems, the Kerala school independently created a number of important mathematics concepts, including [[series expansion]] for trigonometric functions.<ref name="roy"/> Their work, completed two centuries before the invention of [[calculus]] in Europe, provided what is now considered the first example of a [[power series]] (apart from geometric series).<ref>{{Harv|Stillwell|2004|p=173}}</ref> However, they did not formulate a systematic theory of [[derivative|differentiation]] and [[integral|integration]], nor is there any direct evidence of their results being transmitted outside [[Kerala]].<ref>{{Harv|Bressoud|2002|p=12}} Quote: "There is no evidence that the Indian work on series was known beyond India, or even outside Kerala, until the nineteenth century. Gold and Pingree assert [4] that by the time these series were rediscovered in Europe, they had, for all practical purposes, been lost to India. The expansions of the sine, cosine, and arc tangent had been passed down through several generations of disciples, but they remained sterile observations for which no one could find much use."</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Plofker|2001|p=293}} Quote: "It is not unusual to encounter in discussions of Indian mathematics such assertions as that "the concept of differentiation was understood [in India] from the time of Manjula (... in the 10th century)" [Joseph 1991, 300], or that "we may consider Madhava to have been the founder of mathematical analysis" (Joseph 1991, 293), or that Bhaskara II may claim to be "the precursor of Newton and Leibniz in the discovery of the principle of the differential calculus" (Bag 1979, 294). ... The points of resemblance, particularly between early European calculus and the Keralese work on power series, have even inspired suggestions of a possible transmission of mathematical ideas from the Malabar coast in or after the 15th century to the Latin scholarly world (e.g., in (Bag 1979, 285)). ... It should be borne in mind, however, that such an emphasis on the similarity of Sanskrit (or Malayalam) and Latin mathematics risks diminishing our ability fully to see and comprehend the former. To speak of the Indian "discovery of the principle of the differential calculus" somewhat obscures the fact that Indian techniques for expressing changes in the Sine by means of the Cosine or vice versa, as in the examples we have seen, remained within that specific trigonometric context. The differential "principle" was not generalized to arbitrary functions—in fact, the explicit notion of an arbitrary function, not to mention that of its
derivative or an algorithm for taking the derivative, is irrelevant here"</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Pingree|1992|p=562}} Quote: "One example I can give you relates to the Indian Mādhava's demonstration, in about 1400 A.D., of the infinite power series of trigonometrical functions using geometrical and algebraic arguments. When this was first described in English by Charles Whish, in the 1830s, it was heralded as the Indians' discovery of the calculus. This claim and Mādhava's achievements were ignored by Western historians, presumably at first because they could not admit that an Indian discovered the calculus, but later because no one read anymore the ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society'', in which Whish's article was published. The matter resurfaced in the 1950s, and now we have the Sanskrit texts properly edited, and we understand the clever way that Mādhava derived the series ''without'' the calculus; but many historians still find it impossible to conceive of the problem and its solution in terms of anything other than the calculus and proclaim that the calculus is what Mādhava found. In this case the elegance and brilliance of Mādhava's mathematics are being distorted as they are buried under the current mathematical solution to a problem to which he discovered an alternate and powerful solution."</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Katz|1995|pp=173–174}} Quote: "How close did Islamic and Indian scholars come to inventing the calculus? Islamic scholars nearly developed a general formula for finding integrals of polynomials by A.D. 1000—and evidently could find such a formula for any polynomial in which they were interested. But, it appears, they were not interested in any polynomial of degree higher than four, at least in any of the material that has come down to us. Indian scholars, on the other hand, were by 1600 able to use ibn al-Haytham's sum formula for arbitrary integral powers in calculating power series for the functions in which they were interested. By the same time, they also knew how to calculate the differentials of these functions. So some of the basic ideas of calculus were known in Egypt and India many centuries before Newton. It does not appear, however, that either Islamic or Indian mathematicians saw the necessity of connecting some of the disparate ideas that we include under the name calculus. They were apparently only interested in specific cases in which these ideas were needed.<br>{{quad}}There is no danger, therefore, that we will have to rewrite the history texts to remove the statement that Newton and Leibniz invented the calculus. They were certainly the ones who were able to combine many differing ideas under the two unifying themes of the derivative and the integral, show the connection between them, and turn the calculus into the great problem-solving tool we have today."</ref>
derivative or an algorithm for taking the derivative, is irrelevant here"</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Pingree|1992|p=562}} Quote: "One example I can give you relates to the Indian Mādhava's demonstration, in about 1400 A.D., of the infinite power series of trigonometrical functions using geometrical and algebraic arguments. When this was first described in English by Charles Whish, in the 1830s, it was heralded as the Indians' discovery of the calculus. This claim and Mādhava's achievements were ignored by Western historians, presumably at first because they could not admit that an Indian discovered the calculus, but later because no one read anymore the ''Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society'', in which Whish's article was published. The matter resurfaced in the 1950s, and now we have the Sanskrit texts properly edited, and we understand the clever way that Mādhava derived the series ''without'' the calculus; but many historians still find it impossible to conceive of the problem and its solution in terms of anything other than the calculus and proclaim that the calculus is what Mādhava found. In this case the elegance and brilliance of Mādhava's mathematics are being distorted as they are buried under the current mathematical solution to a problem to which he discovered an alternate and powerful solution."</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Katz|1995|pp=173–174}} Quote: "How close did Islamic and Indian scholars come to inventing the calculus? Islamic scholars nearly developed a general formula for finding integrals of polynomials by A.D. 1000—and evidently could find such a formula for any polynomial in which they were interested. But, it appears, they were not interested in any polynomial of degree higher than four, at least in any of the material that has come down to us. Indian scholars, on the other hand, were by 1600 able to use ibn al-Haytham's sum formula for arbitrary integral powers in calculating power series for the functions in which they were interested. By the same time, they also knew how to calculate the differentials of these functions. So some of the basic ideas of calculus were known in Egypt and India many centuries before Newton. It does not appear, however, that either Islamic or Indian mathematicians saw the necessity of connecting some of the disparate ideas that we include under the name calculus. They were apparently only interested in specific cases in which these ideas were needed.<br />{{quad}}There is no danger, therefore, that we will have to rewrite the history texts to remove the statement that Newton and Leibniz invented the calculus. They were certainly the ones who were able to combine many differing ideas under the two unifying themes of the derivative and the integral, show the connection between them, and turn the calculus into the great problem-solving tool we have today."</ref>


The Kerala school has made a number of contributions to the fields of [[Series (mathematics)|infinite series]] and [[calculus]]. These include the following (infinite) geometric series:
The Kerala school has made a number of contributions to the fields of [[Series (mathematics)|infinite series]] and [[calculus]]. These include the following (infinite) geometric series:
Line 219: Line 222:
{{block indent|<math>1^p+ 2^p + \cdots + n^p \approx \frac{n^{p+1}}{p+1}</math>}}
{{block indent|<math>1^p+ 2^p + \cdots + n^p \approx \frac{n^{p+1}}{p+1}</math>}}


for large ''n''.
for large {{Mvar|n}}.


They applied ideas from (what was to become) [[Derivative|differential]] and [[integral]] [[calculus]] to obtain ([[Taylor series|Taylor–Maclaurin]]) infinite series for <math>\sin x</math>, <math>\cos x</math>, and <math> \arctan x</math>.<ref name=bressoud>Bressoud, David. 2002. "Was Calculus Invented in India?" ''The College Mathematics Journal'' (Mathematical Association of America). 33(1):2–13.</ref> The ''Tantrasangraha-vakhya'' gives the series in verse, which when translated to mathematical notation, can be written as:<ref name=roy/>
They applied ideas from (what was to become) [[Derivative|differential]] and [[integral]] [[calculus]] to obtain ([[Taylor series|Taylor–Maclaurin]]) infinite series representations for <math>\sin x</math>, <math>\cos x</math>, and <math> \arctan x</math>.<ref name=bressoud>Bressoud, David. 2002. "Was Calculus Invented in India?" ''The College Mathematics Journal'' (Mathematical Association of America). 33(1):2–13.</ref> The ''Tantrasangraha-vakhya'' gives the series in verse, which when translated to mathematical notation, can be written as:<ref name=roy/>


{{block indent|<math>r\arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right) = \frac{1}{1}\cdot\frac{ry}{x} -\frac{1}{3}\cdot\frac{ry^3}{x^3} + \frac{1}{5}\cdot\frac{ry^5}{x^5} - \cdots, \text{ where } \frac y x \leq 1. </math>}}
{{block indent|<math>r\arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right) = \frac{1}{1}\cdot\frac{ry}{x} -\frac{1}{3}\cdot\frac{ry^3}{x^3} + \frac{1}{5}\cdot\frac{ry^5}{x^5} - \cdots, \text{ where } \frac y x \leq 1. </math>}}
Line 232: Line 235:
where, for <math> r = 1, </math> the series reduce to the standard power series for these trigonometric functions, for example:
where, for <math> r = 1, </math> the series reduce to the standard power series for these trigonometric functions, for example:


{{block indent|<math>\sin x = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \frac{x^7}{7!} + \cdots </math> and}}
{{block indent|<math>\sin x = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \frac{x^7}{7!} + \cdots </math>}}


{{block indent|<math>\cos x = 1 - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \frac{x^6}{6!} + \cdots </math>}}
{{block indent|<math>\cos x = 1 - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \frac{x^6}{6!} + \cdots </math>}}
Line 238: Line 241:
(The Kerala school did not use the "factorial" symbolism.)
(The Kerala school did not use the "factorial" symbolism.)


The Kerala school made use of the rectification (computation of length) of the arc of a circle to give a proof of these results. (The later method of Leibniz, using quadrature (''i.e.'' computation of area under the arc of the circle), was not yet developed.)<ref name=roy/> They also made use of the series expansion of <math>\arctan x</math> to obtain an infinite series expression (later known as Gregory series) for <math>\pi</math>:<ref name=roy/>
The Kerala school made use of the rectification (computation of length) of the arc of a circle to give a proof of these results. (The later method of Leibniz, using quadrature (i.e. computation of area under the arc of the circle), was not yet developed.)<ref name=roy/> They also made use of the series expansion of <math>\arctan x</math> to obtain an infinite series expression (later known as Gregory series) for <math>\pi</math>:<ref name=roy/>
{{block indent|<math>\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots </math>}}
{{block indent|<math>\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots </math>}}


Their rational approximation of the ''error'' for the finite sum of their series are of particular interest. For example, the error, <math>f_i(n+1)</math>, (for ''n'' odd, and ''i = 1, 2, 3'') for the series:
Their rational approximation of the error for the finite sum of their series are of particular interest. For example, the error, <math>f_i(n+1)</math>, (for {{Mvar|n}} odd, and ''i = 1, 2, 3'') for the series:


{{block indent| <math>\frac{\pi}{4} \approx 1 - \frac{1}{3}+ \frac{1}{5} - \cdots (-1)^{(n-1)/2}\frac{1}{n} + (-1)^{(n+1)/2}f_i(n+1)</math>
{{block indent| <math>\frac{\pi}{4} \approx 1 - \frac{1}{3}+ \frac{1}{5} - \cdots (-1)^{(n-1)/2}\frac{1}{n} + (-1)^{(n+1)/2}f_i(n+1)</math>
{{block indent|where <math>f_1(n) = \frac{1}{2n}, \ f_2(n) = \frac{n/2}{n^2+1}, \ f_3(n) = \frac{(n/2)^2+1}{(n^2+5)n/2}.</math>}}}}
{{block indent|where <math>f_1(n) = \frac{1}{2n}, \ f_2(n) = \frac{n/2}{n^2+1}, \ f_3(n) = \frac{(n/2)^2+1}{(n^2+5)n/2}.</math>}}}}


They manipulated the terms, using the partial fraction expansion of :<math>\frac{1}{n^3-n}</math> to obtain a more rapidly converging series for <math>\pi</math>:<ref name=roy/>
They manipulated the terms, using the partial fraction expansion of <math>\frac{1}{n^3-n}</math> to obtain a more rapidly converging series for <math>\pi</math>:<ref name=roy/>


{{block indent|<math>\frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{3^3-3} - \frac{1}{5^3-5} + \frac{1}{7^3-7} - \cdots </math>}}
{{block indent|<math>\frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{3}{4} + \frac{1}{3^3-3} - \frac{1}{5^3-5} + \frac{1}{7^3-7} - \cdots </math>}}


They used the improved series to derive a rational expression,<ref name=roy/> <math>104348/33215</math> for <math>\pi</math> correct up to nine decimal places, i.e. <math>3.141592653</math>. They made use of an intuitive notion of a [[Limit (mathematics)|limit]] to compute these results.<ref name=roy/> The Kerala school mathematicians also gave a semi-rigorous method of differentiation of some trigonometric functions,<ref name=katz>Katz, V. J. 1995. "Ideas of Calculus in Islam and India." ''Mathematics Magazine'' (Mathematical Association of America), 68(3):163–174.</ref> though the notion of a function, or of exponential or logarithmic functions, was not yet formulated.
They used the improved series to derive the rational expression<ref name=roy/> <math>104348/33215</math> for <math>\pi</math>, correct up to nine decimal places (i.e. <math>3.141592653</math>). They made use of an intuitive notion of a [[Limit (mathematics)|limit]] to compute these results.<ref name=roy/> The Kerala school mathematicians also gave a semi-rigorous method of differentiation of some trigonometric functions,<ref name=katz>Katz, V. J. 1995. "Ideas of Calculus in Islam and India." ''Mathematics Magazine'' (Mathematical Association of America), 68(3):163–174.</ref> though the notion of a function, or of exponential or logarithmic functions, was not yet formulated.


== Veṭṭathu Tradition (Kathakali) ==
== Veṭṭathu Tradition (Kathakali) ==
The so-called "Veṭṭathu Tradition" or Veṭṭathu Sampradayam of the Kerala dance drama [[Kathakali]] is attributed to a Raja of Veṭṭathunāṭu (1630–1640). The Raja introduced several important developments into the presentation of Kathakali;<ref name=":0">Culture of Kerala</ref>
The so-called "Veṭṭathu Tradition" (''Veṭṭathu Sampradayam'') of the Kerala dance drama [[Kathakali]] is attributed to a Raja of Veṭṭathunāṭu (1630–1640). The Raja introduced several important developments into the presentation of Kathakali:<ref name=":0">Culture of Kerala</ref>


* Introduction of two professional background singers<ref name=":0"/>
* Introduction of two professional background singers.<ref name=":0"/>
* Introduction of [[chengila]]s ([[cymbals]]) to beat the [[tala (music)|tala (rhythm)]]<ref name=":0"/>
* Introduction of [[chengila]]s ([[cymbals]]) to beat the [[tala (music)|tala (rhythm)]].<ref name=":0"/>
* Introduction of [[chenda]], a powerful drum played with sticks. Chendas were originally played in the outdoor temple ceremonies to accompany shadow puppets.<ref name=":0"/>
* Introduction of [[chenda]], a powerful drum played with sticks. Chendas were originally played in the outdoor temple ceremonies to accompany shadow puppets.<ref name=":0"/>
* Two singers, the Ponnikkaran and the Sinkidikkaran, were introduced to add the Thiranukuu. Thiranukuu is a method of introducing the evil characters of the play to the audience from behind a large satin curtain, held up at the front of the stage.<ref name=":0"/>
* Two singers, the ''Ponnikkaran'' and the ''Sinkidikkaran'', were introduced to add the ''Thiranukuu''. ''Thiranukuu'' is a method of introducing the evil characters of the play to the audience from behind a large satin curtain, held up at the front of the stage.<ref name=":0"/>


==Legacy==
==Legacy==
* T. Raman Nambeesan (1888–1983) wrote a historical novel called ''Keralesvaran'' (1926) about a ruler of [[Tanur, India|Tanur]].
* T. Raman Nambeesan (1888–1983) wrote a historical novel called ''Keralesvaran'' (1926) about a ruler of Tanur.
* ''Chandrika Vithi'' written by Muriyanattu Nampyar mentions a Vettathu raja called Viraraya of Prakasa Kingdom'.
* ''Chandrika Vithi'', written by Muriyanattu Nampyar, mentions a Vettathu raja called 'Viraraya of Prakasa Kingdom'.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 271: Line 274:
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
===Works cited===
{{refbegin|2}}
* {{Citation |last=Bressoud |first=David |title=Was Calculus Invented in India? |journal=The College Mathematics Journal |volume=33 |issue=1 |year=2002 |pages=2–13 |jstor=1558972 |doi=10.2307/1558972}}.
* {{Citation |last=Katz |first=Victor J. |title=Ideas of Calculus in Islam and India |journal=Mathematics Magazine |volume=68 |issue=3 |year=1995 |pages=163–174 |jstor=2691411 |doi=10.2307/2691411}}.
* {{Citation |last=Plofker |first=Kim |title=The "Error" in the Indian "Taylor Series Approximation" to the Sine |journal=Historia Mathematica |volume=28 |issue=4 |year=2001 |pages=283–295 |doi=10.1006/hmat.2001.2331 |doi-access=free}}.
* {{Citation |last1=Stillwell |first1=John |year=2004 |edition=2 |title=Mathematics and its History |place=Berlin and New York |publisher=Springer, 568 pages |isbn=0-387-95336-1}}.
{{refend}}


==External links==
==External links==
Line 281: Line 292:
{{Malabar}}
{{Malabar}}
{{Kerala}}
{{Kerala}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Dynasties of India]]
[[Category:Dynasties of India]]
[[Category:History of Kerala]]
[[Category:Nair]]
[[Category:Nair]]
[[Category:Former countries in South Asia]]
[[Category:Former monarchies of India]]
[[Category:Former monarchies of Asia]]
[[Category:States and territories disestablished in 1793]]
[[Category:Historical Indian regions]]
[[Category:Former countries in Asia]]
[[Category:Empires and kingdoms of India]]
[[Category:1766 disestablishments]]
[[Category:Indian monarchs]]
[[Category:Geography of Kerala]]
[[Category:Malappuram district]]
[[Category:History of Malappuram district]]
[[Category:History of Malappuram district]]
[[Category:Regions of Kerala]]
[[Category:Portuguese India]]
[[Category:Portuguese India]]
[[Category:Feudal states of Kerala]]
[[Category:Kingdoms of Kerala]]
[[Category:1571 in India]]

Latest revision as of 17:36, 27 March 2026


Kingdom of Tanur
Vettathunad  (Malayalam)
Tanur Swaroopam  (Malayalam)
Prakashabhu  (Sanskrit)
Kingdom of Light  (English)
Before 12th century CE–1793
Capital
10°58′N 75°52′E / 10.97°N 75.87°E / 10.97; 75.87
Common languagesMalayalam
GovernmentKingdom
History 
• Established
Before 12th century CE
• Death of last Raja
24 May 1793
Today part ofMalappuram, Kerala, India

The Kingdom of Tanur (also referred to as Vettathunadu, Vettam, Tanur Swaroopam, and Prakashabhu; or the Kingdom of Light) was a feudal principality on the Malabar Coast of the Indian subcontinent during the Middle Ages. It was governed by the Tanur dynasty, a Hindu ruling family that claimed Kshatriya status. The kingdom encompassed parts of the coastal taluks of Tirurangadi, Tirur, and Ponnani in present-day Malappuram district, including locations such as Tanur, Tirur (historically known as Trikkandiyur) and Chaliyam. The kingdom also contained the coastal villages of Kadalundi and Chaliyam in the southernmost region of Kozhikode district.[2][3]

The rulers of Vettathunadu were long-standing feudatories of the Zamorin of Calicut.[4] With the arrival of the Portuguese on the Malabar Coast, the Vettathunadu kings began to manoeuvre between the Portuguese and the Zamorin. They were among the first vassals of Calicut to stand up against the Zamorin with Portuguese support.[2] In 1546, Francis Xavier visited Tanur and the Keraladeshpuram Temple located there.[5]

In 1549, a ruler of Vettathunadu[who?] converted to Christianity under Portuguese influence. This conversion marked a shift in the kingdom's alliance, allowing the Portuguese to construct a fortress at Chaliyam.[2]

In the 17th century, the Queen of Cochin adopted some Vettathunadu princes. This adoption included parts of the Chovvaram (Sukapuram) village, which was one of the 64 historic villages of Nambudiris. The adoption contributed to tensions among the regional powers and principalities.[2]

The Tanur royal family became extinct following the death of the last king on 24 May 1793.[6] Afterwards, the kingdom came under control of the English East India Company. In 1842, the temple associated with the royal family was transferred to the Zamorin of Calicut, marking the end of the kingdom's independent identity.[7]

The Vettathunadu rulers were renowned patrons of arts and learning. A Vettathunadu ruler is credited with introducing innovations toKathakali, which have come to be known as the Vettathu Sambradayam ('Vettathu tradition'). The region was also the birthplace of the famous poets Thunchaththu Ramanujan Ezhuthachan, celebrated as "the father of modern Malayalam", and Vallathol Narayana Menon, the founder of Kerala Kalamandalam.[2]

The Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. Scholars from the school made significant advancements in addressing astronomical problems and independently developed a number of important mathematical concepts, including series expansion for trigonometric functions.[8][9]

Etymology and dominions[edit | edit source]

Erstwhile Vettathunadu Taluk in the Malabar District during British rule. It was merged with Ponnani Taluk in 1861; it later separated to form Tirur Taluk in 1957.

The name Tanur Swaroopam (Tanni-ur Swaroopam) is derived from three words in the Malayalam language: tanni refers to the tree bastard myrobalan, ur translates to "village", and swaroopam to "kingdom".[10] In literary works, the kingdom is often referred to as Prakasa Bhu ('The Kingdom of Light'), and its ruler as Prakasa Bhu Palan.[2] The king of Tanur Swaroopam was addressed raja, thampuran, or naduvazhi.[2]

During the British arrival, the Kingdom of Tanur ('nadu') was divided into 21 administrative divisions called amsoms as documented by William Logan.[11] Each amsom often had a central bazaar. The divisions were as follows:[11]

Political history[edit | edit source]

Ancient history[edit | edit source]

Names, routes, and locations of the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea (1st century CE)

The ancient port of Tyndis, mentioned in the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, was located on the northern side of Muziris and is believed to have been situated near Tanur.[12] The exact location of Tyndis remains disputed, with suggested sites at Ponnani, Tanur, BeyporeChaliyamKadalundiVallikkunnu, and Koyilandy.[12] Notably, Ponnani marked the southern boundary of the kingdom of Tanur, while the Beypore–Chaliyam–Kadalundi–Vallikkunnu region was at its northern end. Tyndis was a major trade hub, second only to Muziris, facilitating trade between the Cheras dynasty and the Roman Empire.[13]

Pliny the Elder, writing in the 1st century CE, noted that the port of Tyndis was located at the northwestern border of Keprobotos (Chera dynasty).[14] During the Sangam period, the North Malabar region, lying north of the port at Tyndis, was ruled by the kingdom of Ezhimala.[15] According to the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, the region known as Limyrike began at Naura and Tyndis. However, Ptolemy identified only Tyndis as the Limyrike's starting point. Limyrike likely extended to Kanyakumari, corresponding approximately to the present-day Malabar Coast. The annual value of trade between Rome and this region has been estimated at around 50,000,000 sesterces.[16] Pliny the Elder also mentioned that Limyrike was prone to attacks by pirates.[17] Cosmas Indicopleustes identified it as a key source of peppers.[18][19]

Pre-Portuguese history[edit | edit source]

The early history of Vettathunadu, prior to the arrival of the Portuguese armadas, remains largely obscure.[2] According to legendary traditions, the origin of the dynasty is often dated back to the Chera period.[2] The Chera Kingdom began to disintegrate in the early 12th century.[2] During the following period of instability, most of the Chera lands were taken over by newly arrived Namboothris and Nair chieftains, who defeated the Tamil governors and vassals of the Chera administration. Many of these local rulers proclaimed independence.[2]

Vasco da Gama and Manavikraman Zamorin by Veloso Salgado (1864–1945)

The ruler of Vettathunadu was among the earliest Nair chieftains in Malabar to acknowledge the suzerainty of the Zamorin of Calicut.[2] The neighbouring states of Parappanad and Beypore also became vassals of the Zamorin.[2] Calicut annexed these regions probably between 1340 and 1350 AD.[20] The primary objective of these conquests was not territorial expansion but rather control of strategic ports and the fertile paddy fields of the Bharathappuzha (Nila) river valley.[20] While regions like Parappanad, Valluvanad, and Vettathunadu prospered due to their geographical advantage in maritime trade, the inland Eranad region suffered from limited access to the Arabian Sea and less fertile lands for paddy cultivation.[2] Following the annexation the Zamorin himself prepared and attended a coronation function of the Vettathunadu king.[20] This was a unique occurrence, as no other vassal state under the Zamorin received such attention. This may be interpreted as the Zamorin's strategy to solidify his authority over the parts, the Bharathappuzha river system, and its fertile valley.[20]

The successors of the Zamorin, known as the Eralpads, governed the banks of the Bharathappuzha river after the annexation of territories formerly belonging to Vettathunadu and neighbouring principalities.[2] During the Thirunavaya Wars, fought between the Cochin–Valluvanad alliance and Calicut, the rulers of Vettathunadu supported the Zamorin.[2] Following the capture of Thirunavaya, the Zamorin declared himself Protector and assumed the sole right to conduct the famous Mamankam festival.[2] As part of their allegiance, all feudatories, including the Vettathunadu king, were required to send flags to Thirunavaya during the festival as a symbol of respect for the Zamorin.[2] During the Mamankam festival, the king of Vettathunadu held the right to stand on the right of the Zamorin of Calicut, while the Shah Bandar Koya of Calicut stood on the Zamorin's left.[21]

After the puberty ceremony (thirandu-kalyanam) of the Zamorin princess (Thampurati), the Zamorin selected a suitable husband for his "anathiraval". They were generally chosen, for political and strategic reasons from the dynasties of Vettam, Berypore, Kurumburanad, and Kodungallur.[22]

As the coronation ceremonies (Ari-yittu-vazhcha) of a new Zamorin, held after the death of his uncle, included a ritual where the Zamorin entered the pulakuli pond hand-in-hand with the raja of Punnattur. Until 1793, the Vettathunadu king also participated in the ceremony, holding the Zamorin's right hand, with the Punnattur king holding his left.[22] The lord of Kalpakanchery (a region within Vettathunadu) was also present during the coronation of a new Zamorin.[22]

Portuguese arrival[edit | edit source]

Map of India from 1652 (Tanur was a major port town on Malabar Coast)

Template:Excessive detail

The rulers of Tanur aligned with the Portuguese during the 16th and 17th centuries.

The Portuguese Armada, led by Vasco da Gama, first landed in Malabar in 1498. However, the Zamorin of Calicut soon expelled the Portuguese from his territories. The Portuguese quickly found local allies among some of the city-states on the Malabar Coast, such as Cochin, Cannanore, and Quilon. The ruler of Tanur (Vettathuraja), who was partially subject to the Zamorin at the time, also seized this opportunity to break away.[10] Like the kings of Beypore and Chaliyam (Parappanad), he secretly opposed the policies of the Zamorin regarding the Kingdom of Cochin.[22] Despite these alliances with the Portuguese, the Tanur forces under the king fought for the Zamorin in the Battle of Cochin (1504).[11]

The Defection of Tanur[edit | edit source]

After the raid on Cranganore in October 1504, Lopo Soares de Albergaria, commander of the Sixth Portuguese Indian Armada, received an urgent appeal from the ruler of Tanur. The Vettathuraja, in conflict with his overlord, the Zamorin of Calicut, offered to submit Portuguese suzerainty in exchange for military assistance.[2] The Vettathuraja reported that a Calicut column, personally led by the Zamorin, had been hastily assembled to counter the Portuguese hold on Cranganore. However, the forces of Tanur managed to block the Zamorin's passage at Tanur. Responding to his request, Lopo Soares dispatched Pêro Rafael with a caravel and a sizeable Portuguese armed contingent to aid Tanur.[2] The combined forces defeated and dispersed Zamorin's column upon its arrival.

Governor Lopo Soares de Albergaria, in Livro de Lisuarte de Abreu

The raid on Cranganore and the defection of Tanur dealt serious blows to the Zamorin, pushing the frontline northward and placing the Vembanad lagoon out of the Zamorin's reach. The loss dashed any immediate hopes the Zamorin had of resuming his attempts to capture Cochin via the backwaters.[22] Equally devastating were the battles at Cranganore and Tanur, involving significant numbers of Malabari captains and troops, which exposed the waning authority of the Zamorin.[22]

On 31 December 1504, commander Lopo Soares de Albergaria set out from Cochin with plans to dock briefly at the port of Ponnani to pay respects to his newly aligned ally, the king of Vettam.[22] During the negotiations for entry at the port, Lopo Soares received a message that redirected him to the Battle of Pandarane (modern-day Koyilandi). Later in 1505, the king of Vettam invited a small Portuguese force to his kingdom.[22] Despite a growing alliance with the Portuguese, the king hesitated to openly defy the Zamorin. Instead, he sent the Portuguese back with numerous presents and a pledge of secret support against the Zamorin.[22]

Describing the kingdom, Barbosa (1516) says:[10]

Further on … are two places of Moors (Mappilas) 5 leagues from one another. One is called Paravanor, and the other Tanor, and inland from these towns is a lord (Vettathuraja) to whom they belong; and he (Vettathuraja) has many Nairs, and sometimes he rebels against the King of Calicut (Samoothiri). In these towns, there is much shipping and trade, for these Moors is great merchants.

Correa (1521) praises the kingdom's hospitality, saying:[10]

…and the lord of Tanor (Vettathuraja), who carried on a great sea-trade with many ships, which trafficked all about the coast of India with passes from our (Portuguese) Governors, for he only dealt in wares of the country; and thus he was the greatest possible friend of the Portuguese, and those who went to his dwelling were entertained with the greatest honour, as if they had been his brothers. In fact, for this purpose he kept houses fitted up, and both cots and bed-steads furnished in our fashion, with tables and chairs and casks of wine, with which he regaled our people, giving them entertainments and banquets, insomuch that it seemed as if he were going to become a Christian…

Muslim merchants in the region remained steadfastly allied with the Zamorin of Calicut.[3] In 1523, a bold merchant from Tanur demonstrated his loyalty by sailing a fleet of 8 ships and 40 boats from Calicut to the Red Sea before the eyes of the Portuguese viceroy Duarte de Menezes.[3] At the time, Portuguese power in the region was too weak to respond to such actions. Following the death of the Portuguese viceroy Vasco da Gama in December 1524, tensions escalated.[3] Shortly thereafter, some 100 ships, with the support of Zamorin, attacked Jewish and Christian settlements in Kodungallūr.[3] This attacking Moplah party included men from Tānūr and Chāliyam.[3] In 1528, a ship was wrecked off the coast of Vettam, and the king of Vettam provided shelter to the crew, refusing to surrender them to the Zamorin.[22] Some sources indicate that the ship belonged to Portugal. However, the Tohfut-ul-Mujahideen identifies the ship as French:

And in the year (A.H.) 935, a ship belonging to the Franks was wrecked off Tanur. Now the Ray of that place affording aid to the crew, the Zamorin sent a messenger to him demanding of him the surrender of the Franks who composed it, together with such parts of the cargo of the ship as had been saved, but that chieftain having refused compliance with this demand, a treaty of peace was entered into with the Franks by him; and from this time the subjects of the Ray of Tanur traded under the protection of the passes of the Franks.[3]

Then, envoys of Nuno da Cunha[22] entered into a successful intrigue with the king of Vettam (the same king to be converted to Christianity later) to make a fort on the north bank of the Bharathappuzha river, opposite of Ponnāni town. However, the Portuguese were not successful as the ships bringing building materials were destroyed when trying to cross the dangerous river mouth during a storm.[22]

In 1529, being joined by six brigantines and a galley, with 100 chosen men commanded by Christopher de Melo, the united squadron of Lope Vaz de Sampayo took a very large ship laden with pepper in the river Chale, though defended by numerous artillery and 800 men.[23][3]Template:Excessive detail inline

Battles at Chaliyam Fort[edit | edit source]

Siege and battles at Chaliyam Fort
Part of Portuguese battles in the Indian Ocean
Date1538-40, 1571
Location
Chaliyam, India
Result Victory of Zamorin of Calicut, destruction of Chaliyam fort
Belligerents
Portuguese Empire
Tanur, Malappuram
Chaliyam
Zamorin of Calicut
Mappilas from Ponnani, Punur, Tanur and Parappanangadi
Commanders and leaders
Athed (?) Zamorin of Calicut
Pattu Kunnhāli (Kunnhāli Marakkār III)

Template:Portuguese colonial campaigns

South India from a map by Emanuel Bowen, an English map engraver. Note that in the map, only Vettathunadu is shown with a separate boundary within the Kingdom of Samoothiri.

Chāliyam (also known as Chale) was a strategic Portuguese garrison between 1531 and 1571.[24] Only 10 km south of Calicut, it was situated on a river that falls into the sea about three leagues from Calicut, and which is navigable by boats all the way to the foot of the Ghat mountains.[25]

In 1531, the 'Christian convert' Vettam king[who?] permitted[26] the construction of a Portuguese fort on Chaliyam island as a part of a peace treaty between the Zamorin (Samoothiri) and the Portuguese viceroy (the governor-general) Nuno da Cunha.[25] Perplexed by his great losses continually sustained due to the Portuguese superiority at sea, the Samoothiri made overtures towards an accommodation and under Nuno da Cunha the Portuguese began retaining their lost supremacy.[25] At this time, Chaliyam was controlled by the Parappanad raja named Urinama.[25] Like the Vettathuraja, he also helped the Portuguese. These two kings were anxious to throw off their subjection to the Samoothiri and to ally with the Portuguese in hopes of becoming rich by participating in their trade.

Immediately upon procuring the consent of the Zamorin to construct the fort, Nuno da Cunha set out from Goa with 150 sail of vessels, in which were 3,000 Portuguese troops and 1,000 native Lascarines. So much diligence was used in carrying on the work—with even the gentlemen participating in the labour—that in twenty-six days it was in a defensible situation, being surrounded by a rampart nine feet thick and of sufficient height, strengthened by towers, bastions, and bulwarks.[25] The rectangular-shaped fort was built to decline the Arab sea trade in the region. In 1532 with the help of the king of Vettam, a chapel was built at Chaliyam, together with a house for the commander, barracks for the soldiers, and storehouses for trade. The Portuguese captain Diego de Pereira, who had negotiated the treaty with the Zamorin, was left in command of this new fortress, with a garrison of 250 men; and Manuel de Sousa had orders to secure its safety by sea, with a squadron of twenty-two vessels.[25]

The Samoothiri soon regretted allowing this fort to be built in his dominions, and endeavoured ineffectually to induce the rebellious kings—the Parappanatturaja, the Caramanlii (King of Beypore?), and by some records the Vettathuraja[25]—to break with the Portuguese, even going to war against them.[3]

Samoothiri's first attempt (1538–1540)[edit | edit source]

Within seven years, the Zamorin attacked Vettam and Chāliyam (Parappanad) in 1538. The king of Parappanād made unconditional peace with the Zamorin.[3] The king of Vettam, after a protracted fight, was compelled to surrender some of his lands near Ponnāni and Chāliyam island;[3] however, the Portuguese fort could not be destroyed. The Zamorin now had absolute control over the area around the fort.[3] By 1540, the Zamorin entered into an agreement with the Portuguese and stopped the war, but skirmishes continued in the seas by Moplah navigators based at Ponnāni.[3]

Conversion of Vettathuraja[edit | edit source]

From 1545, the Vettathuraja banked on the Portuguese to help him solidify his position vis-à-vis the Samoothiri.[3] In his experience in dealing with the Portuguese, he presumed that converting to Christianity was the way to express his political alliance and client relationship. The Vettathuraja announced to the Portuguese religious specialists that his conversion had to remain secret in order not to lose his honour or his Caste. In fact, it was his close political (and religious ties) to the Portuguese that may have brought him certain disadvantages on the complicated checkerboard of power relations on the Malabar Coast.[3] Jesuit records claim that the Vettathuraja thus played his own double game with the Portuguese and rival regional kings. The Vettathuraja demanded to preserve after conversion certain external signs of his caste, such as the Poonul, as well as other Hindu customs. The unanimous opinion of the ecclesiastics in Goa was that such dissimulation went against the decisions of the Church Fathers. The theologians in Goa were puzzled and undecided about the question as to whether or not to permit Vettathuraja to continue wearing the external signs of a Brahman.[3]

An urgent ad hoc consultation headed by Governor Jorge Cabral debated this issue and drafted some of the first typically accommodationist propositions. It was the bishop, Juan de Albuquerque, who furnished Biblical examples on behalf of such accommodating practices.[27][28]

Voyages of St. Francis Xavier

Tanur town was one of the oldest Portuguese settlements in Kerala. In 1546, Saint Francis Xavier visited Tanur.[2][5]

In 1549 the King of Vettam fell in the offers of the Portuguese and officially converted to Christianity.[2] The conversion took place in Goa in a festive mood led by a Jesuit padre named António Gomes. Gomes was a Catholic missionary who arrived from Goa in October 1548. The offer was to make him the king of Kērala by defeating the Zamorin. The poor king believed them. At the time, the choice to convert the Vettathuraja—whose tiny realm was jammed between Samoothiri to the north, mostly hostile to Portuguese, and the fortress of Chaliyam, guarded by Portuguese soldiers—appeared both practical and providential. Jesuit records says that Vettathuraja himself begged to be converted and asked for a Christian priest to reside in Tanur.[3]

After the conversion, he was called Dom João. Vettathuraja was not permitted in Goa. After various spectacular or secret negotiations, confinements and escapes, Vettathuraja did finally visit Goa in October 1549. He received a sumptuous and ostentatious reception. He was paraded in procession through Goa, accompanied by various musical instruments such as trombetas, kettledrums and shawms, as well as artillery discharges and church bells; Vettathuraja was dressed up by the Portuguese as they felt fitting for the king:[2] "in honourable and rich clothes, with a very rich sword fastened [around the waist], with a rich dagger, one golden chain, black velvet slippers, a black velvet hat with a printed design".[6]

But, a few days after, the king returned to Hinduism saying he did not have any gain. Once he regained his kingdom loaded with Portuguese gifts, Vettathuraja doffed his Portuguese clothes and in the long run disappointed Governor Cabral and the Jesuits. It was the politics of pepper that undid his friendship with the Portuguese. On 21 February 1550, Cabral wrote to the king of Portugal Dom João III doubting that Vettathuraja converted sincerely: "Jesuits who had so much confidence in conversion of Vettathuraja confess that they were deceived, but by caution, I have to dissemble with him". In addition, he cautioned that "the conversion to Christianity might produce 'discord' between the Samoothiri and Kochi and endanger the regular procurement of pepper in Kerala".[6][3]

In fact, the Fourth Pepper War broke out sometime before June 1550 over a disputed territory—the island of Varutela—between the King of Kochi and the king of Vadakkumkur. A series of bloody encounters ensued and the Samoothiri allied with the Vettathuraja on the side of the king of Vadakkumkur, who was opposed to the King of Kochi and the Portuguese.[2] After negotiations, rendered even more complicated by the appointment of the new Portuguese viceroy, Dom Affonso de Noronha, the conflict remained unsettled and the amuck runners of the deceased King of Vadakkumkur wreaked havoc in the town of Kochi. Consequently, the cargo of pepper was not sent to Lisbon until late February 1551.[6][3]

Roughly from April until September 1549, Gomes partly resided in Tanur, and partly travelled southwards along the Malabar Coast. He had been officially sent by the bishop, Juan de Albuquerque, to instruct the Vettathuraja reputed to have been secretly converted to Christianity the previous year.[6][3] By this time, the situation had somewhat changed: the Vettathuraja was secretly converted by the vicar in Chaliyam, João Soares, and the Franciscan Frey Vicente de Lagos, who gave the neophyte a metal crucifix to hang onto a thread, "hidden on his chest".[6][3]

Gomes was allowed to build the church in Tanur, to baptise the Vettathuraja's wife as Dona Maria, and to perform Christian marriage rites for the kingly couple—all this was done in secret (ocultamente).

When Lopo Soares arrived at Cochin (1553) after his victory over the Samoothiri, the Vettathuraja sent him a complaint against the Samoothiri, begging for peace and help against the Samoothiri.[10] In 1569 and 1570 there were again wars between the Portuguese and Zamorin's forces at Chāliyam fort. In these wars the notorious Moplah dacoit Kutti Pōker died fighting the Portuguese at Chāliyam fort.[6][3]

Samoothiri's second attempt (1571)[edit | edit source]

In 1571, the Zamorin got a fresh chance against the Portuguese. With help from nearby Moplahs, he began besieging Chāliyam fort.[11] The Moplah admiral Pattu Kunnhāli (Kunnhāli Marakkār III) led the navy of the Zamorin in the siege. Moplahs from Ponnani, Punur, Tanur, and Parappanangadi were in the fleet.

The Zamorin spent great amount of money in the siege. The seizing force dug many trenches around the fortress. At the end of the two months of siege, the Zamorin himself came to Chaliyam from Ponnani and began to command. The Portuguese were starving inside the garrison, since food sent from Cochin and Cannanore was being blocked.[11]

After two months of siege, on the midnight of 15 September 1571, the Portuguese led by Athed surrendered to the alliance.[11] They agreed empty the fortress on the condition that no one will be harmed. The Vettam king escorted the Portuguese in their return journey to Tanur. Then they were sent to Cochin.

The Zamorin destroyed the fort and the chapel—it has been his greatest problem ever since its construction in 1531.[3] He sent most of the debris to Calicut and he gave the land to build a new mosque.[3] As earlier decided, he gave Kottaparamba and the surrounding areas to the king of Parappanād, his ally in the siege.[11]

Antonio Fernandes de Chaliyam (Chale) held an important command under Portuguese generals, and was raised to the dignity of a knight of the military Order of Christ. He was a convert from Chaliyam. Killed in action in 1571, Antonio Fernandes received a state funeral at Goa.[citation needed]Template:Relevant inline

The Portuguese sailors burned Chāliyam town in 1572 as revenge.[11]

Post-Portuguese history[edit | edit source]

By the 17th century, the Portuguese authority on the Malabar Coast significantly reduced with the emergence of the Dutch. Soon the small principalities in the region became puppets in the hands of the two colonial powers and fought each other.[6][2] In 1658 the crown of Cochin became vacant and five princes from the Tānūr and Aroor dynasties were adopted to the palace by the regent of Cochin, Queen Gangādhara Lakshmi (1656–1658), and were given the right to succeed. This regent queen was under the influence of the Portuguese, and later the eldest member of the adoptees from Tanur, Rama Varma (1658–1662), was crowned. This incidence of adoption is mentioned in some of the local folk tales. However, Henric Vanrid has stated that the number of adoptions as four. Two of the five adopted were from Tanur, but there is no hint of how many people were adopted from Aroor and what happened to them later. Nonetheless, nine of them survived to be kings.[6]

Codacal Tile Factory was run by the Commonwealth Trust at Codacal. Started in 1887, it was the second tile manufacturing industry in India.
Tirur railway station, the oldest railway station of Kerala, opened in 1861

However, an elder branch (mūtta tāvazhi) of the Cochin dynasty itself ignored the adoptions and appealed to the Zamorin of Calicut for help. The leader of the elder branch was the dispossessed prince Vīra Kērala Varma. The Zamorin decided to help the elder branch and Āditya Varma, king of Vadakkumkūr, king of Edappally and ruler of Pāliyam rallied around the Zamorin in support of the elder branch's dispossessed prince.[2] The king of Purakkad supported the ruling Tānūr princes. On the advice of the chief of Pāliyam, the dispossessed prince set sail to Colombo in Ceylon and asked help from the Dutch governor, Joan Maetsuycker, against the Portuguese-supported ruling princes. Later he sought exile in Colombo. The Dutch now found a huge chance of getting a major say in the politics of Malabar.[2] In 1661, the Dutch led the allies of the dispossessed prince, with the armies of Zamorin of Calicut, against the Portuguese and the ruling Cochin king (Tānūr adoptee). The city of Cochin was attacked and the battle resulted in a disastrous failure of the Portuguese and Cochin rulers. Three of the Tānūr princes including Rama Varma killed in the war, Rani Gangadharalakshmi was sent to prison and the ruling king escaped to Eranākulam where he was given refuge by the king of Purakkad. After the death of Rama Varma and the other adopted prince Goda Varma (1662–1663), only survivor from Tanur, was crowned. On 7 January 1663, the Dutch attacked Cochin Port again and the prince surrendered to the Dutch. Vīra Kērala Varma (1663–1687) later crowned as the king of Cochin by the Dutch.[2]

With the eclipse of the Portuguese influence in Malabar, the Kingdom of Tanur was reduced in status to one of the numerous petty states in the region.[2] In the 18th century, the Kingdom of Mysore expanded its territory to the Malabar Coast; the Tanur royal family lost many of its members during the invasion of Mysore. By the treaty of Seringapatam, Mysore ceded Malabar to the English East India Company. On 14 August 1792, a minister of Tanur took over the kingdom for his king from the East India Company.[2] With the death of the Vettam king on 24 May 1793, the Tanur dynasty came to an end.[6] At the time, Joint Commissioners were carrying out revenue settlements of the kingdom as the beginning of the British occupation in Malabār. Since there was no heir to the throne, the British took over the rule again and soon absorbed Tanur into the newly formed Malabar District.[6] The temple of the Tanur royal family was transferred to the Zamorin of Calicut in 1842.[6]

Ponnani Canal[edit | edit source]

The Ponnani Canal was constructed for the transportation of goods from Ponnani to the Tirur railway station. Basel Mission employees at Codacal mentioned the Ponnani Canal, saying:[29]

''...nowadays a steamship travels between Ponani and Tirur through the Canal, where the most convenient railway station for Ponnani is to be found. The ticket costs only 4 annas, although the distance is 10 km...''

Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics[edit | edit source]

The Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. In attempting to solve astronomical problems, the Kerala school independently created a number of important mathematics concepts, including series expansion for trigonometric functions.[8] Their work, completed two centuries before the invention of calculus in Europe, provided what is now considered the first example of a power series (apart from geometric series).[30] However, they did not formulate a systematic theory of differentiation and integration, nor is there any direct evidence of their results being transmitted outside Kerala.[31][32][33][34]

The Kerala school has made a number of contributions to the fields of infinite series and calculus. These include the following (infinite) geometric series:

11x=1+x+x2+x3+ for |x|<1[35]

The Kerala school made intuitive use of mathematical induction, though the inductive hypothesis was not yet formulated or employed in proofs.[8] They used this to discover a semi-rigorous proof of the result:

1p+2p++npnp+1p+1

for large Template:Mvar.

They applied ideas from (what was to become) differential and integral calculus to obtain (Taylor–Maclaurin) infinite series representations for sinx, cosx, and arctanx.[36] The Tantrasangraha-vakhya gives the series in verse, which when translated to mathematical notation, can be written as:[8]

rarctan(yx)=11ryx13ry3x3+15ry5x5, where yx1.
rsinxr=xxx2(22+2)r2+xx2(22+2)r2x2(42+4)r2
r(1cosxr)=rx2(222)r2rx2(222)r2x2(424)r2+

where, for r=1, the series reduce to the standard power series for these trigonometric functions, for example:

sinx=xx33!+x55!x77!+
cosx=1x22!+x44!x66!+

(The Kerala school did not use the "factorial" symbolism.)

The Kerala school made use of the rectification (computation of length) of the arc of a circle to give a proof of these results. (The later method of Leibniz, using quadrature (i.e. computation of area under the arc of the circle), was not yet developed.)[8] They also made use of the series expansion of arctanx to obtain an infinite series expression (later known as Gregory series) for π:[8]

π4=113+1517+

Their rational approximation of the error for the finite sum of their series are of particular interest. For example, the error, fi(n+1), (for Template:Mvar odd, and i = 1, 2, 3) for the series:

π4113+15(1)(n1)/21n+(1)(n+1)/2fi(n+1)
where f1(n)=12n, f2(n)=n/2n2+1, f3(n)=(n/2)2+1(n2+5)n/2.

They manipulated the terms, using the partial fraction expansion of 1n3n to obtain a more rapidly converging series for π:[8]

π4=34+13331535+1737

They used the improved series to derive the rational expression[8] 104348/33215 for π, correct up to nine decimal places (i.e. 3.141592653). They made use of an intuitive notion of a limit to compute these results.[8] The Kerala school mathematicians also gave a semi-rigorous method of differentiation of some trigonometric functions,[37] though the notion of a function, or of exponential or logarithmic functions, was not yet formulated.

Veṭṭathu Tradition (Kathakali)[edit | edit source]

The so-called "Veṭṭathu Tradition" (Veṭṭathu Sampradayam) of the Kerala dance drama Kathakali is attributed to a Raja of Veṭṭathunāṭu (1630–1640). The Raja introduced several important developments into the presentation of Kathakali:[38]

  • Introduction of two professional background singers.[38]
  • Introduction of chengilas (cymbals) to beat the tala (rhythm).[38]
  • Introduction of chenda, a powerful drum played with sticks. Chendas were originally played in the outdoor temple ceremonies to accompany shadow puppets.[38]
  • Two singers, the Ponnikkaran and the Sinkidikkaran, were introduced to add the Thiranukuu. Thiranukuu is a method of introducing the evil characters of the play to the audience from behind a large satin curtain, held up at the front of the stage.[38]

Legacy[edit | edit source]

  • T. Raman Nambeesan (1888–1983) wrote a historical novel called Keralesvaran (1926) about a ruler of Tanur.
  • Chandrika Vithi, written by Muriyanattu Nampyar, mentions a Vettathu raja called 'Viraraya of Prakasa Kingdom'.

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. M. K. Devassy (1965), 1961 Census Handbook- Kozhikode District (PDF), Directorate of Census Operations, Kerala and The Union Territory of Laccadive, Minicoy, and Amindivi Islands, p. 77
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 2.23 2.24 2.25 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 Menon, A. Sreedhara (1967). A Survey Of Kerala History (2007 ed.). DC Books (published 2008). ISBN 9788126415786.
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 Nainar, S. Muhammad Hussain (1942). Tuhfat-al-Mujahidin: An Historical Work in The Arabic Language. University of Madras. ISBN 9781458985552.
  4. "Bettut (Vettutnaar, Vettatnad)". PRINCELY STATES OF INDIA. Archived from the original on 16 March 2012. Retrieved 16 August 2011.
  5. 5.0 5.1 M, Mathew K. (1996). Manorama Year Book 1996 (31nd ed.). Kottayam: Malayala Manorama.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  6. 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 William, Logan (1887). Malabar Manual. Vol. 1. Madras: Government Press. p. 659.
  7. Madras Legislative Assembly Debates. Official Report by Madras (India : State). Legislature. Legislative Assembly, p. 373
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 Roy, Ranjan (1990). "Discovery of the Series Formula for π by Leibniz, Gregory, and Nilakantha". Mathematics Magazine. 63 (5): 291–306. doi:10.2307/2690896. JSTOR 2690896.
  9. Pingree, David (1992), "Hellenophilia versus the History of Science", Isis, 83 (4): 554–63, Bibcode:1992Isis...83..554P, doi:10.1086/356288, JSTOR 234257, S2CID 68570164, One example I can give you relates to the Indian Mādhava's demonstration, in about 1400 A.D., of the infinite power series of trigonometrical functions using geometrical and algebraic arguments. When this was first described in English by Charles Whish, in the 1830s, it was heralded as the Indians' discovery of calculus. This claim and Mādhava's achievements were ignored by Western historians, presumably at first because they could not admit that an Indian discovered the calculus, but later because no one read the Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, in which Whish's article was published. The matter resurfaced in the 1950s, and now we have the Sanskrit texts properly edited, and we understand the clever way that Mādhava derived the series without the calculus, but many historians still find it impossible to conceive of the problem and its solution in terms of anything other than the calculus and proclaim that the calculus is what Mādhava found. In this case, the elegance and brilliance of Mādhava's mathematics are being distorted as they are buried under the current mathematical solution to a problem to which he discovered an alternate and powerful solution.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 "Bibliomania: Free Online Literature and Study Guides".
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 Logan, William: Malabār, the manual of Malabār
  12. 12.0 12.1 Menon, A. Sreedhara (2007). A Survey of Kerala History. DC Books. ISBN 9788126415786.
  13. Coastal Histories: Society and Ecology in Pre-modern India, Yogesh Sharma, Primus Books 2010
  14. Gurukkal, R., & Whittaker, D. (2001). In search of Muziris. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 14, 334–350.
  15. A. Shreedhara Menon, A Survey of Kerala History
  16. According to Pliny the Elder, goods from India were sold in the Empire at 100 times their original purchase price. See [1]
  17. Bostock, John (1855). "26 (Voyages to India)". Pliny the Elder, The Natural History. London: Taylor and Francis.
  18. Indicopleustes, Cosmas (1897). Christian Topography. 11. United Kingdom: The Tertullian Project. pp. 358–373.
  19. Das, Santosh Kumar (2006). The Economic History of Ancient India. Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd. p. 301.
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 Welcome to the home page of C. Radhakrishnan, Malayalam novelist and Author
  21. Malayala Manorama daily from Malayala Manorama group, India
  22. 22.00 22.01 22.02 22.03 22.04 22.05 22.06 22.07 22.08 22.09 22.10 22.11 "The Zamorins of Calicut" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2010.
  23. Columbia Educational on-line.
  24. Portuguese India: History of Portuguese Cochin, Cannanore, Quilon. Malabar (Kerala)
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 Kerr, Robert; Edin, F.A.S. (1811–1820). "Chapter 1, Section 7: Continuation of the Portuguese Transactions in India, from 1526 to 1538". General History and Collection of Voyages and Travels, Arranged in Systemic Order: Forming a Complete History of the Origin and Progress of Navigation, Discovery, and Commerce, by Sea and Land, from the Earliest Ages to the Present Time. Vol. 6.
  26. Panikkassery, Velayudhan. MM Publications (2007), Kottayam India
  27. "Diocese of Calicut Malabar Mission: 1498-1923". Archived from the original on 1 June 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2010.
  28. "'One civility, but multiple religions': Jesuit mission among St. Thomas christians in India (16TH-17TH centuries)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2011. Retrieved 28 September 2010.
  29. Website of Ines Zupanov
  30. (Stillwell 2004, p. 173)
  31. (Bressoud 2002, p. 12) Quote: "There is no evidence that the Indian work on series was known beyond India, or even outside Kerala, until the nineteenth century. Gold and Pingree assert [4] that by the time these series were rediscovered in Europe, they had, for all practical purposes, been lost to India. The expansions of the sine, cosine, and arc tangent had been passed down through several generations of disciples, but they remained sterile observations for which no one could find much use."
  32. Plofker 2001, p. 293 Quote: "It is not unusual to encounter in discussions of Indian mathematics such assertions as that "the concept of differentiation was understood [in India] from the time of Manjula (... in the 10th century)" [Joseph 1991, 300], or that "we may consider Madhava to have been the founder of mathematical analysis" (Joseph 1991, 293), or that Bhaskara II may claim to be "the precursor of Newton and Leibniz in the discovery of the principle of the differential calculus" (Bag 1979, 294). ... The points of resemblance, particularly between early European calculus and the Keralese work on power series, have even inspired suggestions of a possible transmission of mathematical ideas from the Malabar coast in or after the 15th century to the Latin scholarly world (e.g., in (Bag 1979, 285)). ... It should be borne in mind, however, that such an emphasis on the similarity of Sanskrit (or Malayalam) and Latin mathematics risks diminishing our ability fully to see and comprehend the former. To speak of the Indian "discovery of the principle of the differential calculus" somewhat obscures the fact that Indian techniques for expressing changes in the Sine by means of the Cosine or vice versa, as in the examples we have seen, remained within that specific trigonometric context. The differential "principle" was not generalized to arbitrary functions—in fact, the explicit notion of an arbitrary function, not to mention that of its derivative or an algorithm for taking the derivative, is irrelevant here"
  33. Pingree 1992, p. 562 Quote: "One example I can give you relates to the Indian Mādhava's demonstration, in about 1400 A.D., of the infinite power series of trigonometrical functions using geometrical and algebraic arguments. When this was first described in English by Charles Whish, in the 1830s, it was heralded as the Indians' discovery of the calculus. This claim and Mādhava's achievements were ignored by Western historians, presumably at first because they could not admit that an Indian discovered the calculus, but later because no one read anymore the Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, in which Whish's article was published. The matter resurfaced in the 1950s, and now we have the Sanskrit texts properly edited, and we understand the clever way that Mādhava derived the series without the calculus; but many historians still find it impossible to conceive of the problem and its solution in terms of anything other than the calculus and proclaim that the calculus is what Mādhava found. In this case the elegance and brilliance of Mādhava's mathematics are being distorted as they are buried under the current mathematical solution to a problem to which he discovered an alternate and powerful solution."
  34. Katz 1995, pp. 173–174 Quote: "How close did Islamic and Indian scholars come to inventing the calculus? Islamic scholars nearly developed a general formula for finding integrals of polynomials by A.D. 1000—and evidently could find such a formula for any polynomial in which they were interested. But, it appears, they were not interested in any polynomial of degree higher than four, at least in any of the material that has come down to us. Indian scholars, on the other hand, were by 1600 able to use ibn al-Haytham's sum formula for arbitrary integral powers in calculating power series for the functions in which they were interested. By the same time, they also knew how to calculate the differentials of these functions. So some of the basic ideas of calculus were known in Egypt and India many centuries before Newton. It does not appear, however, that either Islamic or Indian mathematicians saw the necessity of connecting some of the disparate ideas that we include under the name calculus. They were apparently only interested in specific cases in which these ideas were needed.
    Template:QuadThere is no danger, therefore, that we will have to rewrite the history texts to remove the statement that Newton and Leibniz invented the calculus. They were certainly the ones who were able to combine many differing ideas under the two unifying themes of the derivative and the integral, show the connection between them, and turn the calculus into the great problem-solving tool we have today."
  35. Singh, A. N. (1936). "On the Use of Series in Hindu Mathematics". Osiris. 1: 606–628. doi:10.1086/368443. S2CID 144760421.
  36. Bressoud, David. 2002. "Was Calculus Invented in India?" The College Mathematics Journal (Mathematical Association of America). 33(1):2–13.
  37. Katz, V. J. 1995. "Ideas of Calculus in Islam and India." Mathematics Magazine (Mathematical Association of America), 68(3):163–174.
  38. 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 Culture of Kerala

Works cited[edit | edit source]

  • Bressoud, David (2002), "Was Calculus Invented in India?", The College Mathematics Journal, 33 (1): 2–13, doi:10.2307/1558972, JSTOR 1558972.
  • Katz, Victor J. (1995), "Ideas of Calculus in Islam and India", Mathematics Magazine, 68 (3): 163–174, doi:10.2307/2691411, JSTOR 2691411.
  • Plofker, Kim (2001), "The "Error" in the Indian "Taylor Series Approximation" to the Sine", Historia Mathematica, 28 (4): 283–295, doi:10.1006/hmat.2001.2331.
  • Stillwell, John (2004), Mathematics and its History (2 ed.), Berlin and New York: Springer, 568 pages, ISBN 0-387-95336-1.

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Feudal states of Kerala

Template:South Malabar