Anti-Hindu sentiment

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia

Template:Status of religious freedom Template:Discrimination sidebar

Anti-Hindu sentiment, also known as Hinduphobia,[1] is a negative perception, sentiment or actions against the practitioners of Hinduism.


Jeffery D. Long defines the term as an irrational aversion of Hindus (or Hinduism). Vamsee Juluri, a Professor of Media Studies at the University of San Francisco adopts a similar stance.[2][lower-alpha 1]

In 2014, Brian Collins (Chair Professor in Indian Religion and Philosophy at Ohio University) found the tropes of Hinduphobia to be a popular weapon employed by the affluent Hindu diaspora in stifling critical academic discourses on Hinduism — parallels with Kansas creationists were drawn.[5]

In 2021, a group of South Asian scholars formed a collective to combat (what they deemed as) growing harassment of academics by people and organizations affiliated with Hindutva.[6][7] They rejected Hinduphobia as an ahistorical and inappropriate neologism employed by the Hindu Right in order to suppress academic inquiry into topics concerned with Hinduism, Hindutva, caste, and Indian State.[8][9] While racist and anti-Hindu prejudices have been indeed observed, Hindus have not faced any entrenched systematic oppression in India or United States.[8][9] The claimants of Hinduphobia were also accused of engaging in discrimination against Muslims, lower-castes, Dalits, Christians, and progressive Hindus.[9]

Examples of anti-Hindu sentiments

According to the religious dialogue activist P. N. Benjamin, some Christian evangelists denigrate Hindu gods and consider Hindu rituals barbaric, and such attitudes have caused tensions between religious communities.[10][11]

Akbaruddin Owaisi, a leader of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen party in Hyderabad, has been charged several times for hate speeches denigrating Hindu gods and inciting violence against Hindus.[12][13]

A Muslim preacher apologised for insulting Hinduism in 2014, after an uproar.[14]

Hindus have historically been, and continue to be, considered Kafirs by Muslims[15] and Heathen, Satanic or Demonic by some Christians.[16]

Historical instances of anti-Hindu views

Goa Inquisition

The Goa Inquisition was a colonial-era Portuguese institution established by the Roman Catholic Holy Office between the 16th- and 19th-century to stop and punish heresy against Christianity in South Asia.[17][18][19][20] The institution persecuted Hindus through the colonial era Portuguese government and Jesuit clergy in Portuguese India.[17] It was established in 1560, briefly suppressed from 1774 to 1778, continued thereafter and finally abolished in 1820.[21][22] The Inquisition punished those who had converted to Catholicism, but were suspected by Jesuit clergy of practising their previous religion in secret. Predominantly, the persecuted were accused of crypto-Hinduism.[23][24][25][26][27]

During the British Rule

During British rule of the Indian subcontinent, several Evangelical Christian missionaries spread anti-Hindu propaganda as a method to convert Hindus to Christianity. Examples include missionaries like Abbe J.A. Dubois, who wrote "Once the devadasis' temple duties are over, they open their cells of infamy, and frequently convert the temple itself into a stew. A religion more shameful or indecent has never existed amongst a civilized people."[28]



The extremist Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which enforced strict sharia (Islamic law), announced plans to require all Hindus (and Sikhs) to wear identifying badges in public in May 2001, part of the Taliban's campaign to segregate and repress "un-Islamic and idolatrous segments" of Afghan society.[29][30] At the time, about 500 Hindus and 2,000 Sikhs remained in Afghanistan.[31]

The anti-Hindu decree was seen as being reminiscent of the Nazi law which required all Jews to wear identifying yellow badges.[30][32][33] The order prompted international outrage, and it was denounced by the Indian and U.S. governments,[31] as well as by Abraham Foxman of the ADL.[32] Following international pressure, the Taliban regime dropped the badge plans in June 2001.[34]

Religious persecution, discrimination and forced conversion of Hindus has caused Afghanistan's Hindu population to dwindle.[35]

Sikhs and Hindus are continuing to flee from Afghanistan as of July 2020.[36]


In Bangladesh political leaders frequently fall back on "Hindu bashing" in an attempt to appeal to extremist sentiment and stir up communal passions.[37] In one of the most notorious utterances of a mainstream Bangladeshi figure, the then Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, while leader of the opposition in 1996, declared that the country was at risk of hearing "uludhhwani" (a Bengali Hindu custom involving women's ululation) from mosques, replacing the azaan (Muslim call to prayer).[38]

Even the supposedly secular Bangladesh Awami League is not immune from this kind of scare-mongering. The current prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, was alleged to have accused Bangladeshi Hindu leaders in New York of having divided loyalties with "one foot in India and one in Bangladesh". Successive events such as this have contributed to a feeling of tremendous insecurity among the Hindu minority.[39]

The fundamentalists and right-wing parties such as the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jatiya Party often portray Hindus as being sympathetic to India, making accusations of dual loyalty and allegations of transferring economic resources to India, contributing to a widespread perception that Bangladeshi Hindus are disloyal to the state. Also, the right wing parties claim the Hindus to be backing the Awami League.[40]

As widely documented in international media, Bangladesh authorities have had to increase security to enable Bangladeshi Hindus to worship freely[41] following widespread attacks on places of worship and devotees.

On 28 February 2013, the International Crimes Tribunal sentenced Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, the Vice President of the Jamaat-e-Islami to death for the war crimes committed during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. Following the sentence, activists of Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing Islami Chhatra Shibir attacked the Hindus in different parts of the country. Hindu properties were looted, Hindu houses were burnt into ashes and Hindu temples were desecrated and set on fire.[42][43] While the government has held the Jamaat-e-Islami responsible for the attacks on the minorities, the Jamaat-e-Islami leadership has denied any involvement. The minority leaders have protested the attacks and appealed for justice. The Supreme Court of Bangladesh has directed the law enforcement to start suo motu investigation into the attacks. US Ambassador to Bangladesh express concern about attack of Jamaat on Bengali Hindu community.[44][45] The violence included the looting of Hindu properties and businesses, the burning of Hindu homes, rape of Hindu women and desecration and destruction of Hindu temples.[46] According to community leaders, more than 50 Hindu temples and 1,500 Hindu homes were destroyed in 20 districts.[47] On 5 May 2014, A mob of almost 3,000 attacked Hindu households and a temple in eastern Bangladesh after two youths from the community allegedly insulted the Islamic prophet, Muhammad on Facebook.[48][49][50]

In 17 March 2021, a Muslim mob vandalised around 90 Hindu households and several temples at Shalla Upazilla in Sunamganj district. Media reports that the mob was Hefazat-e-Islam Bangladesh supporters and led by Jubo league (The youth branch of ruling political party Bangladesh Awami League) leader Shahidul Islam Shadhin.[51][52]



In April 2006, local authorities demolished several Hindu temples to make way for developmental projects. Their reason was that these temples were unlicensed and squatting on government land. In April and May 2006, several Hindu temples were demolished by city hall authorities in the country, accompanied by violence against Hindus.[53] On 21 April 2006, the Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple in Kuala Lumpur was reduced to rubble after the city hall sent in bulldozers.[54]

The president of the Consumers Association of Subang and Shah Alam in Selangor had been helping to organise efforts to stop the local authorities in the Muslim dominated city of Shah Alam from demolishing a 107-year-old Hindu temple. The growing Islamization in Malaysia is a cause for concern to many Malaysians who follow minority religions such as Hinduism.[55]

On 11 May 2006, armed city hall officers from Kuala Lumpur forcefully demolished part of a 60-year-old suburban temple that serves more than 1,000 Hindus. The "Hindu Rights Action Force", a coalition of several NGO's, have protested these demolitions by lodging complaints with the Malaysian Prime Minister.[56] Many Hindu advocacy groups have protested what they allege is a systematic plan of temple cleansing in Malaysia. The official reason given by the Malaysian government has been that the temples were built "illegally". However, several of the temples are centuries old.[56] According to a lawyer for the Hindu Rights Action Task Force, a Hindu temple is demolished in Malaysia once every three weeks.[57]

Malaysian Muslims have also grown more anti-Hindu over the years. In response to the proposed construction of a temple in Selangor, Muslims chopped off the head of a cow to protest, with leaders saying there would be blood if a temple was constructed in Shah Alam.[58]

Laws in the country, especially those concerning religious identity, are generally slanted towards compulsion into converting to Islam[59]


In Pakistan, anti-Hindu sentiments and beliefs are widely held among many sections of the population. There is a general stereotype against Hindus in Pakistan. Hindus are regarded as "miserly".[60] Also, Hindus are often regarded as kafirs (unbelievers) and blamed for "causing all the problems in Pakistan".[61] Islamic fundamentalist groups operating within Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan have broadcast or disseminated anti-Hindu propaganda among the masses,[62] referring to Hindus as "Hanood" ('Hindu' is singular and Hanood is plural form in Urdu) blaming them for "collaborating with the foreigners" against the people of the region. [check quotation syntax] At the time of Pakistan's creation the 'hostage theory' had been espoused. According to this theory the Hindu minority in Pakistan was to be given a fair deal in Pakistan in order to ensure the protection of the Muslim minority in India.[63][64] However, Khawaja Nazimuddin, the 2nd Prime Minister of Pakistan stated: "I do not agree that religion is a private affair of the individual nor do I agree that in an Islamic state every citizen has identical rights, no matter what his caste, creed or faith be".[65]

Separate electorates for Hindus and Christians were established in 1985—a policy which was originally proposed by Islamist leader Abul A'la Maududi. Christian and Hindu leaders complained that they felt excluded from the county's political process, but the policy had strong support from Islamists.[66]

The Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA), a coalition of Islamist political parties in Pakistan, calls for the increased Islamization of the government and society, specifically taking an anti-Hindu stance. The MMA leads the opposition in the national assembly, held a majority in the NWFP Provincial Assembly, and was part of the ruling coalition in Balochistan. However, some members of the MMA made efforts to eliminate their rhetoric against Hindus.[67]

The public school curriculum in Pakistan was Islamized during the 1980s.[68] The government of Pakistan claims to undertake a major revision to eliminate such teachings and to remove Islamic teaching from secular subjects.[67] The bias in Pakistani textbooks was also documented by Y. Rosser (2003). She wrote that

"in the past few decades, social studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used as locations to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy makers have attempted to inculcate towards their Hindu neighbours", and that as a result "in the minds of generations of Pakistanis, indoctrinated by the 'Ideology of Pakistan' are lodged fragments of hatred and suspicion."[69]

The bias in Pakistani textbooks was studied by Rubina Saigol, K. K. Aziz, I. A. Rahman, Mubarak Ali, A. H. Nayyar, Ahmed Saleem, Y. Rosser and others.

A study by Nayyar & Salim (2003) that was conducted with 30 experts of Pakistan's education system, found that the textbooks contain statements that seek to create hate against Hindus. There was also an emphasis on Jihad, Shahadat, wars and military heroes. The study reported that the textbooks also had a lot of gender-biased stereotypes. Some of the problems in Pakistani textbooks cited in the report were:

"Insensitivity to the existing religious diversity of the nation"; "Incitement to militancy and violence, including encouragement of Jihad and Shahadat"; a "glorification of war and the use of force"; "Inaccuracies of fact and omissions that serve to substantially distort the nature and significance of actual events in our history"; "Perspectives that encourage prejudice, bigotry and discrimination towards fellow citizens, especially women and religious minorities, and other towards nations" and "Omission of concepts ... that could encourage critical self awareness among students". (Nayyar & Salim 2003). The Pakistani Curriculum document for classes K-V stated in 1995 that "at the completion of Class-V, the child should be able to "Understand Hindu-Muslim differences and the resultant need for Pakistan. [p. 154]

A more recent textbook which was published in Pakistan and titled "A Short History of Pakistan" edited by Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi has been heavily criticized by academic peer-reviewers for anti-Hindu biases and prejudices that are consistent with Pakistani nationalism, where Hindus are portrayed as "villains" and Muslims as "victims" living under the "disastrous Hindu rule" and "betraying the Muslims to the British", characterizations that academic reviewers found "disquieting" and having a "warped subjectivity".[70][71][72]

Ameer Hamza, a leader of the banned terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba, wrote a highly derogatory book about Hinduism in 1999 called "Hindu Ki Haqeeqat" ("Reality of (a) Hindu"); he was not prosecuted by the Government.[73]

According to the Sustainable Development Policy Institute report 'Associated with the insistence on the Ideology of Pakistan has been an essential component of hate against India and the Hindus. For the upholders of the Ideology of Pakistan, the existence of Pakistan is defined only in relation to Hindus, and hence the Hindus have to be painted as negatively as possible'[74] A 2005 report by the National Commission for Justice and Peace a non profit organization in Pakistan, found that Pakistan Studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy-makers have attempted to inculcate towards the Hindus. 'Vituperative animosities legitimise military and autocratic rule, nurturing a siege mentality. Pakistan Studies textbooks are an active site to represent India as a hostile neighbour' the report stated. 'The story of Pakistan's past is intentionally written to be distinct from, and often in direct contrast with, interpretations of history found in India. From the government-issued textbooks, students are taught that Hindus are backward and superstitious.' Further the report stated 'Textbooks reflect intentional obfuscation. Today's students, citizens of Pakistan and its future leaders are the victims of these partial truths'.[75][76][77][78]

An editorial in Pakistan's oldest newspaper Dawn commenting on a report in the Guardian on Pakistani Textbooks noted that "by propagating concepts such as jihad, the inferiority of non-Muslims, India's ingrained enmity with Pakistan, etc., the textbook board publications used by all government schools promote a mindset that is bigoted and obscurantist. Since there are more children studying in these schools than in madrassahs the damage done is greater."[79][80] According to a study by a US government commission, textbooks in Pakistani schools foster prejudice and intolerance of Hindus and other religious minorities, and most teachers view non-Muslims as enemies of Islam.[81] According to the historian Professor Mubarak Ali, textbook reform in Pakistan began with the introduction of Pakistan Studies and Islamic studies by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in 1971 into the national curriculum as compulsory subject. Former military dictator Gen Zia-ul-Haq under a general drive towards Islamization, started the process of historical revisionism in earnest and exploited this initiative. 'The Pakistani establishment taught their children right from the beginning that this state was built on the basis of religion – that's why they don't have tolerance for other religions and want to wipe-out all of them.'[80][82]

Outside Asia


By the time Fiji gained independence from colonial rule, Hindus and other Indo-Fijians constituted nearly fifty-percent of the total Fijian population. Nevertheless, the colonial-era laws and the first constitution for Fiji, granted special rights to native Fijians.[citation needed] These laws relegated Hindus as second class citizens of Fiji without full rights. For example, it denied them property rights, such as the ability to buy or own land. Hindus and other Indo-Fijians have since then not enjoyed equal human rights as other Fijians. They can only work as tenant farmers for Fijian landlords.[83] The difference in human rights has been a continuing source of conflict between "native" Fijians and Indo-Fijians, with native Fijians believing Fiji to be their ancestral land that only they can own, and Indo-Fijians demanding equal rights for all human beings.[citation needed][dubious ]

Beyond land ownership, Hindus have been persecuted in the Fijian communal structure. Spike Boydell states, "the [colonial authorities] introduced the divisive and unworkable system of communal representation and communal electoral rolls. Thus, different communities were represented by their own kind. This still extends to schooling in a prevailing quasi apartheid educational system."[84]

During the late 1990s, Fiji witnessed a series of riots by radical native Fijians against Hindus (and other Indo-Fijians). In the spring of 2000, the democratically elected Fijian government led by Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, who was a Hindu, was held hostage by a group headed by George Speight. They demanded a segregated state exclusively for the native Fijians, thereby legally abolishing any human rights the Hindu inhabitants held up until then. Hindu owned shops, Hindu schools and temples were destroyed, vandalized and looted.[85][86]

The Methodist Church of Fiji and Rotuma, and particularly Sitiveni Rabuka who led the 1987 coup in Fiji, called for the creation of a Christian State and endorsed forceful conversion of Hindus after a coup d'état in 1987.[citation needed] In 2012, Fiji Methodist Church's president, Tuikilakila Waqairatu, called for Fiji to officially declare Christianity as the state religion; the Hindu community leaders demanded that Fiji be a secular state where religion and state are separate.[87]

Trinidad and Tobago

The first Hindus arrived in the British colony of Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean aboard the Fatel Razack on 31 May 1845 as indentured laborers who were brought by the British after their abolition of slavery; they were followed by thousands more who came between 1845 to 1917. They worked on the sugarcane, rice, cocoa, and coffee estates. The indentured laborers primarily came from the Bhojpuri region and the Awadhi region of the Hindi Belt in North India. A significant minority also came from South India and very few came from the Punjab, Maharashtra, Kumaon, Garhwal, Haryana, Jammu, Kashmir, Gujarat, Kutch, Odisha, and Bengal regions. A majority of the laborers were Hindu. Unlike the African slaves who they succeeded, the Indians were allowed to keep their culture and traditions. This led to many Hindu immigrants passing on the faith and despite efforts by Christian missionaries to convert them many continued to practice Hinduism. Today, Hinduism is the second largest religion in Trinidad and Tobago and the largest religion of the Indian population in Trinidad and Tobago. Although they were allowed to continue their religion they were met with contempt or indifference by the non-Hindu residents of the country. The Hindu and Muslim clashes that occurred in South Asia continued to occur in Trinidad and Tobago during the days of indentureship and especially while in the Partition of India was going on back in South Asia. During indentureship and even after independence, Hindus have been treated as second class citizens by Trinidad and Tobago.

The Hindus in Trinidad and Tobago struggled during the early days after independence and even during the period of colonial rule over the granting of adult franchise, a Hindu marriage act, Hindu schools, cremation ordinance, the right to Diwali as a public holiday, and others. Many of these rights were later granted, due to the efforts of Adrian Cola Rienzi (Krishna Deonarine Tiwari) and the Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha, the major Hindu organization in Trinidad and Tobago led by Bhadase Sagan Maraj and Simbhoonath Capildeo, and later by Satnarayan Maharaj. The Temple in the Sea, an iconic Hindu temple in Trinidad and Tobago has its history rooted in the discrimination against Hindus. It was originally built by an indentured laborer from British India named Sewdass Sadhu, who had built the first temple on property belonging to the estate owners and the temple had to be torn down and he was jailed. After that, he built a second temple out into no man’s land, the sea, which became known as the Temple in the Sea.

During the Black Power Revolution after independence in the 1960s-1970s many Hindu were targeted and attacked, and riots had broken out. These attacks, the poverty that affected many Hindus, and the status of being treated as second-class citizens led to many Hindu Indo-Trinidadian and Tobagonians to migrate to the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada. After independence the Hindus were marginalized by the African-based People's National Movement (PNM). The opposing party, the People's Democratic Party (PDP) led by Bhadase Sagan Maraj, later turning into the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) led by Bhadase Sagan Maraj, Rudranath Capildeo and Vernon Jamadar, then into the United Labour Front led by Basdeo Panday, then finally turning into the present-day United National Congress (UNC) party led by Basdeo Panday and Kamla Persad-Bissessar, was portrayed as a Hindu party and an Indian party and tactics were used against them. Hindus were described as a "recalcitrant and hostile minority", by Prime Minister Eric Williams. Hindus were alienated by such communal groups. The support of the PNM government to Christian Afro-Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creole art forms such as Carnival and Christmas, while their public rejection and ridicule of Indian and Hindu art forms, was a particular source of contention for the Hindus. The displacement of PNM from power in 1985 would improve the circumstances. There has been persistent discontent among the Hindus with their marginalization. Many groups portray Hindus as "clannish, backward and miserly". During the General Elections of 1986, the absence of the Bhagavad Gita and the Quran at polling stations for required oath-taking was interpreted as a gross insult to Hindus and Muslims. The absence of any Hindu religious texts at the official residence of the President of Trinidad and Tobago during the swearing in of the new Government in 1986 was perceived as another insult to the minority communities since they were represented in the government. The national education system and curriculum have been repeatedly accused of such majority-oriented symbolism. The use of discernibly oriented prayers at Government schools, the non-representation of Hinduism in approved school textbooks, and the lack of emphasis on Hindu religious observance evoked deep resentment from the Hindu community. Intensified protests over the course of the 1980s led to an improvement in the state's attitudes towards Hindus.[88][89]

United Kingdom

Shaun Bailey

In October 2018, it was reported that Conservative Party candidate for the Mayor of London Shaun Bailey had written a pamphlet, entitled No Man’s Land, for the Centre for Policy Studies. In it, Bailey argued that accommodating Hindus "[robs] Britain of its community" and it is also turning the country into a "crime riddled cess pool". He also claimed that South Asians "bring their culture, their country and any problems they might have, with them" and that this was not a problem within the black community "because we’ve shared a religion and in many cases a language".[90]

In the pamphlet, Bailey confused the Hindu religion with the Hindi language: "You don’t know what to do. You bring your children to school and they learn far more about Diwali than Christmas. I speak to the people who are from Brent and they’ve been having Hindi (sic) days off."[91]

The Conservative Party Deputy Chairman, James Cleverly, defended Bailey and insisted that he was being misunderstood, and he implied that black boys were drifting into crime as a result of learning more about other faiths rather than learning about "their own Christian culture".[92] However, the anti-racism Hope Not Hate campaign group called Bailey's comments "grotesque".[93]

United States

The rise of the Indian American community in the United States has triggered some isolated attacks on them, as has been the case with many minority groups in the United States. Attacks which specifically target Hindus in the United States stem from what is often referred to as the "racialization of religion" among Americans, a process that begins when certain phenotypical features which are associated with a group and attached to race in popular discourse become associated with a particular religion or religions. The racialization of Hinduism in American perception has led Americans to perceive Hindus as belonging to a separate group and this contributes to prejudices against them.[94]

In 2019, Swaminarayan Temple in Kentucky was vandalised by miscreants. They sprayed black paint on the deity and sprayed 'Jesus is the only God’ on the walls. The Christian cross was also spray painted on various walls.[95][better source needed] In April 2015, a Hindu temple in north Texas was vandalised when nasty images were spray-painted on its walls. In February 2015, Hindu temples in Kent and the Seattle Metropolitan area were also vandalised.[96][97]

In July 2019, a Hindu Priest who was dressed in his religious attire was physically beaten in Queens, New York, two blocks from Shiv Shakti Peeth Temple in Glen Oaks by Sergio Gouveia. A Senator and New York State Attorney General have called it a hate crime because "If someone is targeted because of religious robe and couple of blocks from temple where he resides it is difficult to believe this was random." Yet, the New York police have not registered it as a hate crime.[98][99]

Pat Robertson

In addition, anti-Hindu views have been expressed which are specifically based on misperceptions of the religion of Hinduism as well as mistaken racial perceptions. In the United States Pat Robertson has denounced Hinduism as "demonic," believing that when Hindus "feel any sort of inspiration, whether it's by a river or under a tree, on top of a hill, they figure that some God or spirit is responsible for that. And so they'll worship that tree, they'll worship that hill or they'll worship anything."[100] His remarks were widely condemned and disputed by Indian Americans and members of many non-partisan advocacy groups.[101] Evangelical leader Albert Mohler defended Robertson's remarks, saying "any belief system, any world view, whether it's Zen Buddhism or Hinduism or dialectical materialism for that matter, Marxism, that keeps persons captive and keeps them from coming to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, yes, is a demonstration of satanic power."[102]

United States Congress

In July, 2007, The United States Senate conducted its morning prayer services with a Hindu prayer,[103] a historical first. During the service, three disruptors, named Ante Nedlko Pavkovic, Katherine Lynn Pavkovic and Christen Renee Sugar, from the Fundamentalist Christian activist group Operation Save America[104] protested by arguing that the Hindu prayer was "an abomination", and they also claimed that they were "Christians and Patriots". They were swiftly arrested and charged with disrupting Congress.[105][106]

The event generated a storm of protest by Christian right groups in the country, with the American Family Association (AFA) opposing the prayer and carrying out a campaign to lobby senators to protest against it.[107][108] Their representative attacked the proceedings as "gross idolatry".[104] The AFA sent an "Action Alert" to its members in which it asked them to e-mail, write letters, or call their Senators and ask them to oppose the Hindu prayer, stating that it is "seeking the invocation of a non-monotheistic god."[109][110][111] The "alert" stated that "since Hindus worship multiple gods, the prayer will be completely outside the American paradigm, flying in the face of the American motto One Nation Under God."[112] The convocation by Zed was in fact disrupted by three protesters in the gallery reportedly shouting "this is an abomination" and other complaints.[109]

Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the protest "shows the intolerance of many religious right activists. They say they want more religion in the public square, but it's clear they mean only their religion."[104]

California Textbook Controversy

A controversy in the US state of California concerning the portrayal of Hinduism in history textbooks began in 2005. A protest was led by Vedic Foundation (VF) and the American Hindu Education Foundation (HEF) by complaining to the California's Curriculum Commission, saying the coverage in sixth grade history textbooks of Indian history and Hinduism was biased against Hinduism; and points of contention includes a textbook's portrayal of the caste system, the Indo-Aryan migration theory, and the status of women in Indian society as the main features of Hinduism.

The California Department of Education (CDE) initially sought to resolve the controversy by appointing Shiva Bajpai, Professor Emeritus at California State University Northridge, as a one-man committee to review revisions proposed by the groups.[113] Michael Witzel and others revisited the proposed changed on behalf of the State Board of Education and suggested reverting some of the approved changes.[114] In early 2006, the Hindu American Foundation sued the State Board over matters of process;[114] the case was settled in 2009.


The Dotbusters was a hate group in Jersey City, New Jersey that attacked and threatened Indian-Americans in the fall of 1987. The name originates from the bindi traditionally worn by Hindu women and girls on their forehead. In July 1987, they had a letter published in the Jersey Journal[115] stating that they would take any means necessary to drive the Indians out of Jersey City:

I'm writing about your article during july [sic] about the abuse of Indian People. Well I'm here to state the other side. I hate them, if you had to live near them you would also. We are an organization called dot busters. We have been around for 2 years. We will go to any extreme to get Indians to move out of Jersey City. If I'm walking down the street and I see a Hindu and the setting is right, I will hit him or her. We plan some of our most extreme attacks such as breaking windows, breaking car windows, and crashing family parties. We use the phone books and look up the name Patel. Have you seen how many of them there are? Do you even live in Jersey City? Do you walk down Central avenue and experience what its [sic] like to be near them: we have and we just don't want it anymore. You said that they will have to start protecting themselves because the police cannot always be there. They will never do anything. They are a weak [sic] race physically and mentally. We are going to continue our way. We will never be stopped.[116]

Jamaat ul-Fuqra

Islamic terrorist group Jamaat ul-Fuqra, known to have been involved in plotting a firebombing of a Hindu temple in Toronto in 1991, is also believed to have been involved in a number of violent acts against Hindu individuals in the United States. They are suspected to have been responsible for "a rash of firebombings of Hindu and Hare Krishna temples in Seattle, Denver, Philadelphia, and Kansas City" in the summer of 1984. They are additionally suspected in a triple murder of three members of a Hindu family in Tacoma, Washington in 1984; the victims included Leela Nevaskar, an Indian healthcare worker visiting the United States on the behalf of the Indian government, as well as her sister and brother-in-law Indira and Pramod Gadre, who were Tacoma residents.[117] The group is additionally suspected in the abduction of Dr. Srinivasu Dasari, a Hindu physician from Overland Park, Kansas, which occurred on the same date as the Tacoma slayings. Dasari remains missing and is presumed to have been murdered.[118]

See also


  1. In a discourse on the related issue of California textbook controversy, Chinnaiah Jangam (Professor of South Asian History at Carleton University) had noted that Juluri did not have any academic training in history, swore by Brahminical ideology, and even wrote a book in defense of militant Hindu nationalism.[3] Juluri rejected the charges.[4]


  1. Long 2011, p. 142.
  2. Juluri, Vamsee (2020). ""Hindu nationalism" or "Hinduphobia"? : Ethnocentrism, errors, and bias in media and media studies". In Sharma, Divya (ed.). Ethics, Ethnocentrism and Social Science Research. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429270260-8. ISBN 9780429270260. S2CID 226346622.
  3. Jangam, Chinnaiah (5 June 2015). "What Is at Stake in Rewriting California School Textbooks?". Economic and Political Weekly. 51 (29): 7–8.
  4. Juluri, Vamsee (5 June 2015). "California Textbooks Issue: A Response". Economic and Political Weekly: 7–8.
  5. Collins, Brian (2014). "Introduction". The Head Beneath the Altar: Hindu Mythology and the Critique of Sacrifice. Michigan State University Press. pp. 26–28. ISBN 978-1-61186-116-7. JSTOR 10.14321/j.ctt7zt5hc.4.
  6. "Hindutva's threat to academic freedom". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  7. Prakash, Priyali. "'Targeted by hate': Audrey Truschke on why she helped write a 'Hindutva Harassment Field Manual'". Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  8. 8.0 8.1 "Bad Faith Bias Claims". Hindutva Harassment Field Manual. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 "Glossary". Hindutva Harassment Field Manual. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  10. "Who's afraid of dialogue?". The Hindu. 9 October 2001. Retrieved 2 June 2017.[dead link]
  11. Bauman, Chad M. (2 February 2015). Pentecostals, Proselytization, and Anti-Christian Violence in Contemporary India. Oxford University Press. p. 125. ISBN 9780190266318.
  12. Bagri, Neha Thirani (8 November 2014). "Indian Muslims Lose Hope in National Secular Party". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 7 June 2017.
  13. "Politician Akbaruddin Owaisi held over 'hate speeches'". BBC News. 8 January 2013. Retrieved 8 January 2013.
  14. "Muslim preacher apologises for insulting Hinduism". Deccan Herald. 31 July 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2017.[permanent dead link]
  15. Engineer, Ashghar Ali (13–19 February 1999). "Hindu-Muslim Problem: An Approach". Economic and Political Weekly. 37 (7): 397. JSTOR 4407649.
  16. Altman, Michael (2017). Heathen, Hindoo, Hindu: American Representations of India, 1721-1893. ISBN 9780190654924.
  17. 17.0 17.1 Glenn Ames (2012). Ivana Elbl (ed.). Portugal and its Empire, 1250-1800 (Collected Essays in Memory of Glenn J. Ames).: Portuguese Studies Review, Vol. 17, No. 1. Trent University Press. pp. 12–15 with footnotes, context: 11–32.
  18. Serrão, José Vicente; Motta, Márcia; Miranda, Susana Münch (2016). Serrão, José Vicente; Motta, Márcia; Miranda, Susana Münch (eds.). "Dicionário da Terra e do Território no Império Português". E-Dicionário da Terra e do Território no Império Português. 4. Lisbon: CEHC-IUL. doi:10.15847/cehc.edittip.2013ss. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. ANTÓNIO JOSÉ SARAIVA (1985), Salomon, H. P. and Sassoon, I. S. D. (Translators, 2001), The Marrano Factory. The Portuguese Inquisition and Its New Christians, 1536–1765 (Brill Academic), pp. 107, 345-351
  20. B. Malieckal (2015). Ruth IllmanL and Bjorn Dahla (ed.). Early modern Goa: Indian trade, transcultural medicine, and the Inquisition. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, Finland. pp. 149–151, context: 135–157. ISBN 978-952-12-3192-6.
  21. "Goa Inquisition was most merciless and cruel". Rediff. 14 September 2005. Retrieved 14 April 2009.
  22. Lauren Benton (2002). Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400-1900. Cambridge University Press. pp. 114–126. ISBN 978-0-521-00926-3.
  23. Salomon, H. P 2001 pp. 345–7
  24. Hannah Chapelle Wojciehowski (2011). Group Identity in the Renaissance World. Cambridge University Press. pp. 215–216 with footnotes 98–100. ISBN 978-1-107-00360-6.
  25. Gustav Henningsen; Marisa Rey-Henningsen (1979). Inquisition and Interdisciplinary History. Dansk folkemindesamling. p. 125.
  26. António José Saraiva (2001). The Marrano Factory: The Portuguese Inquisition and Its New Christians 1536-1765. BRILL Academic. pp. 352–354. ISBN 90-04-12080-7.
  27. Priolkar, Anant Kakba; Dellon, Gabriel; Buchanan, Claudius; (1961), The Goa Inquisition: being a quatercentenary commemoration study of the Inquisition in India, Bombay University Press, pp. 114-149
  28. Hinduism Today | Sep 1993 Archived 29 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  29. Taliban to mark Afghan Hindus, CNN (22 May 2001).
  30. 30.0 30.1 Taliban to Require Identity Badges for Non-Muslims, PBS NewsHour, PBS (22 May 2001).
  31. 31.0 31.1 Luke Harding, Taliban defends Hindu badges plan, The Guardian (23 May 2001).
  32. 32.0 32.1 Jack Kelley, Taliban: Hindus must wear identity labels, USA Today (22 May 2001).
  33. Associated Press (22 May 2001). "Taliban to Enforce Hindu 'Badges.'" Wired. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  34. Taliban drop badge policy for Hindus, United Press International (27 June 2001).
  35. Kumar, Ruchi. "The decline of Afghanistan's Hindu and Sikh communities". Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  36. Bagchi, Joymala. "Sikh Afghan Nationals Narrate Their Stories Of Fear, Suppression And Anxiety Faced In Kabul". Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  37. Print Article - Wanted: Some Hindu spine Archived 29 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  38. Bangladesh opposition leader accused of hurting religious sentiment. Agence-France Press. 18 November 1996.
  39. A Bleak Future for Bangladesh Hindu's Archived 3 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine,
  40. "Amnesty International Report". Archived from the original on 18 October 2006. Retrieved 21 September 2006.
  41. Security fears for Hindu festival, BBC
  42. "Hindus Under Attack in Bangladesh". News Bharati. 3 March 2013. Archived from the original on 17 March 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2013.
  43. "Bagerhat Hindu Temple Set on Fire". 2 March 2013. Archived from the original on 7 April 2013. Retrieved 20 March 2013.
  44. "US worried at violence". The Daily Star (Bangladesh). 12 March 2013. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  45. "Mozena: Violence is not the way to resolution". The Daily Ittefaq. 11 March 2013. Archived from the original on 16 November 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  46. "Bangladesh: Wave of violent attacks against Hindu minority". Press releases. Amnesty International. Archived from the original on 9 March 2013. Retrieved 8 March 2013.
  47. Ethirajan, Anbarasan (9 March 2013). "Bangladesh minorities 'terrorised' after mob violence". BBC News. London. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
  48. "Hindu households, temple attacked in Bangladesh". Deccan Herald. Dhaka. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  49. "Mob of 3000 people attacks Hindu households, temple in Bangladesh". DNA India. Dhaka. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  50. "Mob of 3000 attack Hindu households, temple in Bangladesh". Firstpost. Bangladesh. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  51. "What happened in Shalla?: A first-hand account". 23 March 2021.
  52. "সুনামগঞ্জের হিন্দু গ্রামে হামলা: মামলায় ৮০ জনের নাম, নেই গ্রেপ্তার, পরিস্থিতি থমথমে". BBC News বাংলা.
  53. Temple row - a dab of sensibility please,
  54. "Free domain sharing - Site not yet configured". Archived from the original on 4 November 2006.
  55. Pressure on multi-faith Malaysia,BBC
  56. 56.0 56.1 Hindu group protests 'temple cleansing' in Malaysia Archived 4 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine,Financial Express
  57. Malaysia ethnic Indians in uphill fight on religion Reuters India - 8 November 2007
  58. Malaysia Muslims protest proposed Hindu temple Associated Press - 28 August 2009
  59. Malaysia strips Hindus of rights Daily Pioneer - 19 January 2010
  60. Why are the Jews ‘kanjoos’? —Khaled Ahmed's Review of the Urdu press,Daily times (Pakistan)
  61. "Why democracy didn't take roots in Pakistan?".
  62. Military drops leaflets in Waziristan Archived 17 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine,
  63. Zamindar, Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali (2010). The Long Partition and the Making of Modern South Asia: Refugees, Boundaries, Histories. Columbia University Press. p. 72. ISBN 9780231138475. The logic of the hostage theory tied the treatment of Muslim minorities in India to the treatment meted out to Hindus in Pakistan.
  64. Dhulipala, Venkat (2015). Creating a New Medina: State Power, Islam, and the Quest for Pakistan in Late Colonial North India. Cambridge University Press. p. 19. ISBN 9781316258385. Within the subcontinent, ML propaganda claimed that besides liberating the 'majority provinces' Muslims it would guarantee protection for Muslims who would be left behind in Hindu India. In this regard, it repeatedly stressed the hostage population theory that held that 'hostage' Hindu and Sikh minorities inside Pakistan would guarantee Hindu India's good behaviour towards its own Muslim minority.
  65. Qasmi, Ali Usman (2015). The Ahmadis and the Politics of Religious Exclusion in Pakistan. Anthem Press. p. 149. ISBN 9781783084258. Nazim-ud-Din favored an Islamic state not just out of political expediency but also because of his deep religious belief in its efficacy and practicality...Nazim-ud-Din commented:'I do not agree that religion is a private affair of the individual nor do I agree that in an Islamic state every citizen has identical rights, no matter what his caste, creed or faith be'.
  66. Jones, Owen Bennett (2002). Pakistan: Eye of the Storm. Yale University Press. p. 31. ISBN 0300101473. Retrieved 9 December 2014. separate electorates for minorities in pakistan.
  67. 67.0 67.1 International Religious Freedom Report 2006 Published by the US Department of State
  68. "Pakistan". U.S. Department of State.
  69. "Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil". Archived from the original on 14 November 2003. Retrieved 2007-01-29., by Dr. Yvette C Rosser
  70. Lehmann, F., 1968, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 644–645
  71. Calkins, P. B. Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 643–644, 1968
  72. Ahmed, A., Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, pp. 645–647, 1968
  73. "Pakistan". U.S. Department of State.
  74. Nayyar, A.H. and Salim, A. (eds.)(2003). The subtle Subversion: A report on Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan. Report of the project A Civil Society Initiative in Curricula and Textbooks Reform. Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad.
  75. Hate mongering worries minorities, Daily Times (Pakistan), 2006-04-25
  76. In Pakistan's Public Schools, Jihad Still Part of Lesson Plan - The Muslim nation's public school texts still promote hatred and jihad, reformers say. By Paul Watson, Times Staff Writer; 18 August 2005; Los Angeles Times. 4 Page article online Retrieved on 2 January 2010
  77. Primers Of Hate - History or biology, Pakistani students get anti-India lessons in all their textbooks; 'Hindu, Enemy Of Islam' - These are extracts from government-sponsored textbooks approved by the National Curriculum Wing of the Federal Ministry of Education. Archived 7 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine By AMIR MIR; 10 October 2005; Outlook India Magazine Retrieved on 2 January 2010
  78. Noor's cure: A contrast in views; by Arindam Banerji; 16 July 2003; Rediff India Abroad Retrieved on 2 January 2010
  79. Curriculum of hatred Archived 26 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Dawn (newspaper), 2009-05-20
  80. 80.0 80.1 ‘School texts spreading more extremism than seminaries’ By Our Special Correspondent; Tuesday, 19 May 2009; Dawn Newspaper. Retrieved 1 January 2010
  81. "US commission: Pakistan schools teach Hindu hatred". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. 9 November 2011. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
  82. The threat of Pakistan's revisionist texts, The Guardian, 2009-05-18
  83. Vasil, R. K. (1972) 'Communalism and constitution-making in Fiji', in Pacific Affairs 45 (1 & 2):21-41
  84. Spike Boydell (2001), Philosophical Perceptions of Pacific Property - Land as a Communal Asset in Fiji Department of Land Management and Development, School of Social and Economic Development, University of the South Pacific
  85. "Hindus in South Asia and the Diaspora: A Survey of Human Rights 2005". Retrieved 30 April 2013.
  87. Fiji Hindu group rejects Christian state calls Australian Broadcasting Corporation (6 Sep 2012)
  88. "Cremation act" (PDF). Ministry of Legal Affairs. Retrieved 30 December 2016.
  89. Trinidad and Tobago International Religious Freedom Report 2002. U.S. Department of State. Accessed 2008-05-18.
  90. "Tory London mayoral candidate claimed celebrating Hindu and Muslim festivals has turned Britain into 'cesspool of crime'". The Independent. 4 October 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  91. Sonwalkar, Prasun (4 October 2018). "Anti-Hindu, Muslim views return to haunt London mayor candidate Shaun Bailey". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  92. Sabbagh, Dan (4 October 2018). "Tory deputy chairman admits concerns about Shaun Bailey remarks". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  93. "Tory London mayor candidate's comments 'Islamophobic'". BBC News. 4 October 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  94. Joshi, Khyati, The Racialization of Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism in the United States, Equity & Excellence in Education, Volume 39, Number 3, August 2006, pp. 211–226(16)
  95. "Hindu temple vandalised with hate speech in US, hateful words written on walls". Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  96. "Hindu temple vandalised in U.S." The Hindu. PTI. 31 January 2019. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 12 January 2021.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  97. "US: Hindu temple vandalized in Kentucky, deity sprayed black paint". Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  98. "Community leaders rally around Hindu priest who was beaten". 23 July 2019.
  99. "State Attorney General James Calls Unprovoked Attack On Hindu Priest In Queens A Hate Crime". 23 July 2019.
  100. The 700 Club, 23 March 2006.
  101. "Using TV, Christian Pat Robertson Denounces Hinduism as "Demonic"". Archived from the original on 20 October 2009.
  102. The O'Reilly Factor, Fox News Channel. 17 March 2006.
  103. "Senate Prayer Led by Hindu Elicits Protest". The Washington Post. 2007-07-13. Archived from the original on 2020. Retrieved 2008-12-19. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |archive-date= (help)
  104. 104.0 104.1 104.2 "Christian protesters disrupt first Senate prayer by a Hindu". Boston Herald. Washington. 12 July 2007. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
  105. "A Hindu Prayer in the Senate Meets Protest". The New York Times. 13 July 2007. Retrieved 25 April 2010.
  106. A link to YouTube video at YouTube
  107. Michelle Boorstein, Hindu Groups Ask '08 Hopefuls to Criticize Protest, Washington Post (27 July 2007).
  108. A Prayer and Protest, Las Vegas Sun (13 July 2007).
  109. 109.0 109.1 "Hindu Prayer in Senate Disrupted." Associated Press (published on NBC News). 2007-06-12. Retrieved on 2007-06-15
  110. "ActionAlert: Hindu to open Senate with prayer". American Family Association. Archived from the original on 15 July 2007.
  111. "Senate Prayer Led by Hindu Elicits Protest".
  112. "Hindu to open Senate with prayer AFA Action Alert, July 10, 2007"
  113. flrvs. "A saffron assault abroad". Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  114. 114.0 114.1 "Hindu groups sue California Board of Education". Rediff. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  115. Marriott, Michel (12 October 1987). "In Jersey City, Indians Protest Violence". The New York Times. p. 1. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
  116. "On Common Ground: World Religions in America - The Pluralism Project".
  117. Pierce County Sheriff. "TACOMA TRIPLE 2" (PDF). Fuqra Files. Fuqra Files. Retrieved 17 September 2021.
  118. Olson, Captain Dean T. (2009). Perfect Enemy: The Law Enforcement Manual of Islamist Terrorism (PDF). Springfield, Illinois. p. viii. Retrieved 16 March 2021.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)


  • Long, Jeffery D. (2011), Historical Dictionary of Hinduism, Scarecrow Press

Further reading

External links

Template:Anti-cultural sentiment