Śāstra pramāṇam in Hinduism

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia
(Redirected from Sources of dharma)
Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We need your support to keep the flame of knowledge burning bright! Our hosting server bill is due on June 1st, and without your help, Bharatpedia faces the risk of shutdown. We've come a long way together in exploring and celebrating our rich heritage. Now, let's unite to ensure Bharatpedia continues to be a beacon of knowledge for generations to come. Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Together, let's preserve and share the essence of Bharat.

Thank you for being part of the Bharatpedia family!
Please scan the QR code on the right click here to donate.



transparency: ₹0 raised out of ₹100,000 (0 supporter)

In Hinduism, Śāstra pramāṇam refers to the authority of the scriptures (śruti, Vedas) with regard to puruṣārtha, the objects of human pursuit, namely dharma (right conduct), artha (means of life), kāma (pleasure) and mokṣa (liberation).[1] Together with smṛti ("that which is remembered, tradition": Dharmaśāstra, Hindu Epics, Puranas), ācāra (good custom), and ātmatuṣṭi ("what is pleasing to oneself"), it provides pramana (means of knowledge) and sources of dharma, as expressed in Classical Hindu law, philosophy, rituals and customs.

The first two are undisputed epistemic sources (pramāṇa), where śruti holds the ultimate or supreme authority as Śāstra pramāṇam, while there is difference of opinion for ācāra and ātmatuṣṭi.


Pramāṇa literally means "proof" and is also a concept and field of Indian philosophy. The concept is derived from the Sanskrit roots, pra (प्र), a preposition meaning "outward" or "forth", and (मा) which means "measurement". Pramā means "correct notion, true knowledge, basis, foundation, understand", with pramāṇa being a further nominalization of the word.[2][3] Thus, the concept Pramāṇa implies that which is a "means of acquiring prama or certain, correct, true knowledge".[4]

Shastra commonly refers to a treatise or text on a specific field of knowledge. In early Vedic literature, the word referred to any precept, rule, teaching, ritual instruction or direction.[5] In late and post Vedic literature of Hinduism, Shastra referred to any treatise, book or instrument of teaching, any manual or compendium on any subject in any field of knowledge, including religious.[5] It is often a suffix, added to the subject of the treatise, such as Yoga-Shastra, Nyaya-Shastra, Dharma-Shastra, Koka- or Kama-Shastra,[6] Moksha-Shastra, Artha-Shastra, Alamkara-Shastra (rhetoric), Kavya-Shastra (poetics), Sangita-Shastra (music), Natya-Shastra (theatre & dance) and others.[5][7]

With regard to sāstra pramāṇam is refers to the authority to the Vedic scriptures, as expressed in Bhagavadgita chapter 16, verse 24, where Krishna commands Arjuna to follow the authority of the scriptures:[8][9]

tasmāt śāstraṁ pramāṇam te kāryākārya vyavasthitau
jñātvā śāstravidhānoktam karma kartumihārhasi

Therefore, let the (vedic) scriptures (śāstraṁ) be your authority (pramāṇam) in determining what should be done and what should not be done.
Understand the scriptural injunctions and teachings, and then perform your actions in this world accordingly.[10][note 1]

Sruti, smriti, ācāra and ātmatuṣṭi are also the four sources of dharma in classical Hindu law, as expressed in Bhavishya Purana, Brahmaparva, Adhyaya 7:

vedaḥ smṛtiḥ sadācāraḥ svasya ca priyamātmanaḥ
etaccaturvidhaṃ prāhuḥ sākshāddharmasya lakshaṇam

Vedas, smritis, good (approved) tradition and what is agreeable to one's soul (conscience),
the wise have declared to be the four direct evidences of dharma.[11][note 2]

The explanation of that sloka has been given in the digest (nibandha), bāla nibandhādarśa: there in dharma, vedas are the only chief pramāna. Smritis dissect (analyze) the essence of vedas only. Both of them support Sadācāra. Ātmasantuṣṭi that is favourable to all these is (then) dharma pramāna.[12] [note 3]


Shruti (Sanskrit: श्रुति, IAST: Śruti, IPA: [ɕɽʊtɪ]) in Sanskrit means "that which is heard" and refers to the body of most authoritative, ancient religious texts comprising the central canon of Hinduism.[13] They are the ultimate epistemic authority or mūla pramāṇa (or prathama pramāṇa). Manusmriti states that Śrutistu vedo vigneyah (Sanskrit: श्रुतिस्तु वेदो विज्ञेय:, lit. means "Know that Vedas are Śruti"). Thus, it includes the four Vedas including its four types of embedded texts—the Samhitas, the Brāhmaṇas, the Araṇyakas and the Upaniṣads.[14][15] Bhagavad Gita is also referred as Gitopaniṣad, thereby according it the status of Upanishad (i.e. Śruti), even though it is originally part of smṛti.[16][17][18]

Vedic Sages such as Baudhayana, Parāśara, Vedavyāsa, Gautama,[note 4] Vaśiṣṭha,[note 5] Āpastamba,[note 6] Manu,[note 7] and Yājñavalkya have adhered this view in their works.

The main schools of Indian philosophy that reject the (epistemic authority of) Vedas were regarded as Nāstika, i.e. heterodox in the tradition.[21]


Smriti (Sanskrit: स्मृति, IAST: Smṛti) is considered as the penultimate epistemic authority or dvitīya pramāṇa. Smriti literally means "that which is remembered" and it a body of Hindu texts usually attributed to an author, traditionally written down, in contrast to Śrutis (the Vedic literature) considered authorless, that were transmitted verbally across the generations and fixed.[14] Smriti is a derivative secondary work and is considered less authoritative than Sruti in Hinduism, except in the Mimamsa school of Hindu philosophy.[13][22][23] The authority of smriti accepted by orthodox schools, is derived from that of shruti, on which it is based.[24][25]

The Smrti literature is a corpus of diverse varied texts.[13] This corpus includes, but is not limited to the six Vedāngas (the auxiliary sciences in the Vedas), the Itihasas (i.e. the Mahābhārata and Rāmāyana), the Dharmasūtras and Dharmaśāstras (or Smritiśāstras), the Arthasaśāstras, the Purānas, the Kāvya or poetical literature, extensive Bhasyas (reviews and commentaries on Shrutis and non-Shruti texts), and numerous Nibandhas (digests) covering politics, ethics (Nitisastras),[26] culture, arts and society.[27][28]

Each Smriti text exists in many versions, with many different readings.[14] Smritis were considered fluid and freely rewritten by anyone in ancient and medieval Hindu tradition.[14][22]

The authors of 18 smritis are namely, Atri, Viṣṇu, Hārīta, Auśanasī, Āngirasa, Yama, Āpastamba, Samvartta, Kātyāyana, Bṛhaspati, Parāśara, Vyāsa, Śaṅkha, Likhita,[note 8] Dakṣa, Gautama, Śātātapa and Vaśiṣṭha.[29] Yājñavalkya gives the list of total 20 by adding two more Smritis, namely, Yājñavalkya and Manu.[30][31][note 9] Parāśara whose name appears in this list, enumerates also twenty authors, but instead of Samvartta, Bṛhaspati, and Vyāsa, he gives the names of Kaśyapa, Bhṛgu and Prachetas.


Āpastamba and Vyasa considers the purāṇas as antepenultimate epistemic authority or tṛtīya pramāṇa. In Āpastambasmṛti, it has been mentioned as[note 10]

yat adṛṣṭam hi vedeṣu tat draṣṭavyaṃ smṛtau kila
ubhābhyāṃ yat adṛṣṭastu tat purāṇeṣu paṭhyate

Whenever there is no reference in vedas then smṛtis are to be referred.
In case references are absent in them both, then purāṇas are to be consulted.[note 11]

Vyāsasmṛti (verse 1.5) state that

śrutismṛtipurāṇokta dharmayogyāstu netare

The sayings of Vedas, smṛtis and puranas are deemed to be dharma and not others.[note 12]


Ācāra (Sanskrit: आचार), also siṣṭāchāra or sadāchara, is a concept used in the context of Classical Hindu law that refers to the customary laws or community norms of a particular social group.[34] These community norms are delineated and put into practice by people who have earned the respect of those within each individual group, such as a community leader or elder. Although in Dharmaśāstra the ideal person who defines the ācāra of a particular place is dictated as one who knows the Vedas or is “learned”, in actual practice this role is often deferred to group leaders along with Vedic scholars.[35] Ācāra is theologically important in classical Hindu law because it is considered, along with the Vedas (Śruti), and Smriti (traditional texts such as the Dharmaśāstra literature), to be one of the sources of dharma.[36] Particular regional ācāra is believed to be canonized in Dharmaśāstra texts; however scholars differ on the source for the actual accounts found within these texts.[37]

The Anuśāsana-parva of the Mahabharatastates:

dharmaṃ jijñāsamānānāṃ pramāṇaṃ prathamaṃ śrutiḥ
dvitīyaṃ dharmaśāstraṃ tu tṛtīyo lokasangrahaḥ

Those who have the 'desire to know dharma' (dharma jijñāsa), the first pramāṇa is śruti.
The second pramāṇa are the dharmaśāstras (i.e. the dharma part of smṛti). The third reference is as per the custom of the people.[note 13]

To Parāśara[note 14], Manu, Yājñavalkya, Vaśiṣṭha and Baudhayana, the virtuous conduct of Śiṣṭas (virtuous learned men) and practice of good men, Sadāchara is the antepenultimate epistemic authority or tṛtīya pramāṇa after Śrutis and Smṛtis.[38] Vaśiṣṭhasmṛti verse 1.4 quotes, tadalabhe śiṣṭāchārah pramāṇam, i.e. only if the relevant references are absent in those both, then Śiṣṭa Āchāra can be considered as Antepenultimate pramāṇa. According to the sage Vaśiṣṭha, Śruti and Smṛti are more important sources than others.[39] The Padma Purana also prescribes as similar view.[note 15]

While citing Śiṣṭāgama[note 16] (lit. that which has come down from Śiṣṭas) as the antepenultimate authority after Vedas and smirtis by Baudhayana in his smriti (verse 1.5), the Śiṣṭas are defined thus:-Sistas (indeed are those) who are free from envy (vigatamatsarāḥ), free from pride (nirahankārāḥ), contented with a store of grain sufficient for ten days (kumbhīdhānyāḥ), free from covetousness (alolupāḥ), and free from hypocrisy (damba), arrogance (darpa), greed (lobha), perplexity (confusion) and anger (krodha).[41]

Kumarila Bhatta, prominent Mīmāṃsā scholar from early medieval India states in his Tantravartika:

If the practices of good men (Sadāchāra) are not in conflict with what is taught in the veda and smṛti, such practices can be regarded as authoritative in matters relating to dharma, but when there is the least thing repugnant to the teaching of the Veda, then, as there would be a conflict of authorities, the practices cannot be regarded as any authority at all.[42]


Ātmatuṣṭi is usually translated into English as being "what is pleasing to oneself."[43] The first three sources of law are rooted in the vedas, whereas Ātmatuṣṭi is not. It is because of this that Ātmatuṣṭi, as a fourth source (i.e. caturtha pramāṇa), is not recognized by most scholars due to the lack of legitimacy. Only Manu and Yājñavalkya refer to Ātmatuṣṭi as the fourth source of dharma within the Hindu Law tradition. Textual accounts of Manu's and Yajnavalkya's placement of Ātmatuṣṭi as a fourth source of dharma can be found in The Law Code of Manu 2.6 and The Law Code of Yajnavalkya 1.7. Also, Ātmatuṣṭi does not share the same authority as sruti, smriti, and acara. Ātmatuṣṭi differs significantly from the other three sources of dharma in that it is not based on an "authority exterior to man"; in other words, an individual is able to create their own authority for any issue not covered under sruti, smriti, and acara.[44]

Ātmatuṣṭi is also known as Hṛdayānujña (free will) is mentioned also by Manu, Yājñavalkya and Vishnu distinctly mention this as a or source of moral and religion knowledge.[45] Yājñavalkya goes further step adding good intent (samyaksaṃkalpa) as additional fifth source of Dharma:

śrutiḥ smṛtiḥ sadācāraḥ svasya ca priyam ātmanaḥ
samyaksaṃkalpajaḥ kāmo dharmamūlaṃ idaṃ smṛtam

The source of dharma is declared to be fivefold: 1) śrutiḥ; 2) smṛtiḥ; sadācāraḥ (right conduct); svasya ca priyam ātmanaḥ (one's own benefit) and
5) desire born of purposeful intention (samyaksaṃkalpajaḥ kāmaḥ).[46][note 17]

Later, samyaksaṃkalpa (Pali: sammā saṅkappa) was included among the Noble Eightfold Path (āryāṣṭāṅgamārga) putforth by Gautama Buddha.[48]

Instances of conflict

Conflict between different epistemic sources, generally termed as virodha. When there is an instance of conflict between the smriti and the śruti, the śruti shall prevail.[49][note 18] Similarly, Whenever there is conflict between different epistemic sources in general, then as per Āpastamba, it is advised to refer more preceding epistemic sources as they hold more authority. In Āpastambasmṛti, it is mentioned as

śrutismṛtipurāṇeṣu viruddheṣu parasparam
pūrvaṃ pūrvaṃ balīyam syāditi nyāyavido viduḥ

Whenever there is mutual conflict between vedas, smṛtis and purāṇas, then the ones well-versed in nyāya suggest that
more preceding epistemic source holds higher weightage (than the later epistemic one)[note 19]

Vedavyasa also holds a similar view in his vyāsasmṛti, verse 1.4

śruti smṛti purāṇām virodho yatra driśyate tatra śrotam pramāṇāstu tayordhvyadhe smṛtirvarā

In cases where conflicts are apparent among veda, smriti and Purana, Veda is the valid authority; and where remaining two (Smriti and Purana) are in conflict, Smriti is the valid authority[50][note 20]


The Prasthanatrayi (Sanskrit: प्रस्थानत्रयी, IAST: Prasthānatrayī) are the three canonical texts of Hindu theology having epistemic authority, especially of the Vedanta schools, namely the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras, and the Bhagavad Gita. Prasthanatrayi can viewed as subset of Hindu epistemic sources. Vedanta is also known as Uttara Mīmāṃsā is one of the six (āstika) schools of Hindu philosophy. These six schools are traditionally referred as shad-darśanas as they give their own points of view on the Hindu scriptures. Vedānta school is based on Brahma Sūtras (Sanskrit: ब्रह्म सूत्र) of Bādarāyana. Adi Sankara who propagated Advaita has established the concept of Prasthanatrayi, the epistemic references based on Śāstra pramāṇam in Hinduism. Along with Brahma sutras, upanishads are considered from Vedas and Bhagavad gita is chosen from Mahabharata, which is Itihasa (i.e. part of smriti).[52] The same has been accepted by all other acharyas of other vedanta schools such as Ramanuja, Madhwa, etc.

Modern usage and criticism

Śāstra pramāṇam has been used by social reformers for 19th century from Bengal such as Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar.[53] He was the most prominent campaigner for widow remarriage and was supported in this by many wise and elite gentlemen of the society and the first signatory on his application to the then Governor General was Shri Kasinath Dutta, belonging to the Hatkhola Dutta lineage. He petitioned in legislative council and was responsible for Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act, 1856.[54] In the same century, Similar effort from south India was carried by social reformers such as Kandukuri Veeresalingam pantulu[note 21] and Gurazada Apparao to eradicate social evils.

Baba Saheb Ambedkar has criticized the rigidity of śāstra pramāṇam in Hinduism in his work Annihilation of Caste by attacking especially on Manusmriti.[55] In order to prevent child marriages among Hindus, The Child Marriage Restraint Act was passed in 1929. Śāstra pramāṇam was considered by Hindu pandits appointed by the age of consent committee to fix the age of marriage of girl child and then it was fixed to be 14 later by Sarda Act.[56]

See also


  1. Yajna, a Comprehensive Survey. 2007. p. 338. ISBN 9788186336472. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  2. प्रमा Monier-Williams Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany
  3. John A. Grimes (1996), A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791430675, page 237-238
  4. pramANa Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Monier Williams, Monier Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Oxford University Press, Article on zAstra
  6. Alex Comfort and Charles Fowkes (1993), The Illustrated Koka Shastra: Medieval Indian Writings on Love Based on the Kama Sutra, Simon & Schuster, ISBN 978-0684839813
  7. James Lochtefeld (2002), "Shastra" in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 2: N-Z, Rosen Publishing, ISBN 0-8239-2287-1, page 626
  8. Universal Message of the Bhagavad Gita. 2000. p. 599. ISBN 9788175059337. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  9. Template:Cite q
  10. "ఏడవ అధ్యాయము - 7. వివాహ ధర్మ వర్ణనము".
  11. बाल निबन्धादर्शः (bāla nibandhādarśa). 2000. p. 68. ISBN 9788175059337. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  12. 13.0 13.1 13.2 James Lochtefeld (2002), "Smrti", The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 2: N–Z, Rosen Publishing, ISBN 978-0823931798, page 656-657
  13. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty (1988), Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism, Manchester University Press, ISBN 0-7190-1867-6, pages 2-3
  14. A Bhattacharya (2006), Hinduism: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology, ISBN 978-0595384556, pages 8-14
  15. Veena R. Howard (2017). Dharma: The Hindu, Jain, Buddhist and Sikh Traditions of India. I.B.Tauris. p. 73. ISBN 9781786732125.
  16. Steven Rosen (2011). The Jedi in the Lotus: Star Wars and the Hindu Tradition. Arktos Media Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 9781907166112.
  17. Graham M. Schweig (2010). Bhagavad Gita: The Beloved Lord's Secret Love Song. Harper Collins. ISBN 9780062065025.
  18. Kedar Nath Tiwari (1998). Classical Indian Ethical Thought: A Philosophical Study of Hindu, Jaina, and Buddhist Morals. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 15. ISBN 9788120816084.
  19. Apastamba Dharmasūtram (Sanskrit), Dr. Umeshchandra Pandey, Chaukamba Press (Varanasi), 1969
  20. Gavin D. Flood (1996). An Introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge University Press. p. 82. ISBN 9780521438780.
  21. 22.0 22.1 Sheldon Pollock (2011), Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia (Editor: Federico Squarcini), Anthem, ISBN 978-0857284303, pages 41-58
  22. Harold G. Coward; Ronald Neufeldt; Eva K. Neumaier-Dargyay (1988). Readings in Eastern Religions. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-88920-955-8.; Quote: "smriti is classified as being based on (and therefore less authoritative than) the directly revealed, shruti, literature.";
    Anantanand Rambachan (1991). Accomplishing the Accomplished. University of Hawaii Press. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-8248-1358-1.;
    Ronald Inden; Jonathan S. Walters; et al. (2000). Querying the Medieval: Texts and the History of Practices in South Asia. Oxford University Press. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-19-512430-9.
  23. René Guénon (2009). The Essential Ren' Gu'non: Metaphysics, Tradition, and the Crisis of Modernity. World Wisdom, Inc. pp. 164–. ISBN 978-1-933316-57-4.
  24. Pollock, Sheldon (2012). "The Revelation of Tradition: śruti, smrti, and the Sanskrit Discourse of Power". In Squarcini, Federico (ed.). Boundaries, Dynamics And Construction Of Traditions In South Asia. London: Anthem Press. pp. 41–62. doi:10.7135/upo9781843313977.003. ISBN 978-1-84331-397-7.
  25. smRti Monier-Williams' Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon, Germany
  26. Purushottama Bilimoria (2011), The idea of Hindu law, Journal of Oriental Society of Australia, Vol. 43, pages 103-130
  27. Roy Perrett (1998), Hindu Ethics: A Philosophical Study, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 978-0824820855, pages 16-18
  28. "Aṣṭādaśasmṛtayaḥ". Kṣemarāja Śrīkṛṣṇadāsa. Veṅkaṭeśvara Steam Press, Mumbai. 1910.
  29. "The Asiatic Journal and Monthly Miscellany". Wm. H. Allen & Company. Parbury, Allen & Co. 1828. p. 156.
  30. "Tattwabodhini Sabha and the Bengal Renaissance". Amiyakumar Sen. Publication Section, Sadharan Brahmo Samajo. 1979. p. 291.
  31. https://www.astrojyoti.com/pdfs/DevanagariFiles/06Yagyavalkya_Smriti.pdf Template:Bare URL PDF
  32. Kandukuri Vireesalingam (1882). stri punarvivāha śāstrasangrahamu (PDF). p. 686.
  33. Davis, Jr. Donald R. Chapter One.
  34. Davis, Jr. Donald R. Chapter Seven
  35. Davis, Jr. Donald R. Chapter One
  36. Lariviere, Richard W. 1997. pp. 612.
  37. S. K. Purohit (1994). Ancient Indian legal philosophy: its relevance to contemporary jurisprudential thought. Deep & Deep Publications. p. 34. ISBN 9788171005833.
  38. Rajadharma in Mahabharata: With Special Reference to Shanti-Parva. 2019. ISBN 9788124610084. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  39. Guru: The Universal Teacher. 2017. ISBN 9781683832454. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  40. 41.0 41.1 https://www.astrojyoti.com/pdfs/DevanagariFiles/baudhayana_smriti.pdf Template:Bare URL PDF
  41. Kedar Nath Tiwari (1998). Classical Indian Ethical Thought: A Philosophical Study of Hindu, Jaina, and Buddhist Morals. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. pp. 17–18. ISBN 9788120816084.
  42. Olivelle, Patrick. 2004. The Law Code of Manu. 2.6.
  43. Lingat 1973, p. 6.
  44. "Journal & Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Volume 6". Asiatic Society. 1911. p. 300.
  45. Ajay K. Rao (2015). Re-figuring the Ramayana as Theology: A History of Reception in Premodern India. Routledge. ISBN 9781134077427.
  46. "Yajnavalkya-Smrti (Plain text)".
  47. Ajahn Brahm (27 May 2018). "Word of the Buddha".
  48. Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy. 2006. p. 503. ISBN 9781134691159. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  49. Hindu Widow Marriage. 2012. p. 67. ISBN 9780231526609. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  50. https://www.astrojyoti.com/pdfs/DevanagariFiles/02Vyasa_Smriti.pdf Template:Bare URL PDF
  51. Vepa, Kosla. The Dhaarmik Traditions. Indic Studies Foundation.
  52. Hindu Widow Marriage. 2012. ISBN 9780231526609. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  53. Chakraborty, Uma (2003). Gendering caste through a feminist lens. Popular Prakashan. ISBN 978-81-85604-54-1. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
  54. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, 1936. Anhilation of Caste. p. 54
  55. "The Child Marriage Restraint Act (Act XIX of 1929)" (PDF). A. S. Srinivasa Aiyyar. The Law Publishing Company, Mylapore, Madras. 1930.


  1. तस्मात् शास्त्रं प्रमाणं ते कार्याकार्यव्यवस्थितौ । ज्ञात्वा शास्त्रविधानोक्तं कर्म कर्तुमिहार्हसि ॥
  2. वेदः स्मृतिः सदाचारः स्वस्य च प्रियमात्मनः । एतच्चतुर्विधं प्राहुः साक्षाद्धर्मस्य लक्षणम् ॥
  3. तत्र धर्मे मुख्यं प्रमाणं वेद एव। वेदार्थमेव विसकलयन्ति स्मृतिः। तदुभय समर्थितश्च आचारः। तदनुकूलैव च आत्मसन्तुष्टि धर्मे प्रमाणम् ॥
  4. Gautama dharmasūtras state that Vedo dharmamūlam tadvidām ca śmṛtiśīle (lit. means "Vedas are primary source of our moral ideals and beliefs. After vedas, the authority of śmṛti is accepted in this respect").[19]
  5. Vaśiṣṭha Dharmasūtra state that śrutismṛti vihito dharmaḥ (lit. means "Vedas and smṛtis taken together have been regarded as source of dharma (of course, the former given the first preference).
  6. Āpastamba Dharmasūtram state that vedā eva mūlapramāṇaṃ dharmādharmayoḥ (Sanskrit: वेदा एव मूलप्रमाणं धर्माधर्मयोः, lit. means "Vedas alone is primary source (mūlapramāṇaṃ ) for dharma and adharma.").[20]
  7. Manusmriti states that Śrutistu vedo vigneyaḥ (lit. means "Know that Vedas are Śruti").
  8. Śaṅkha, Likhita are brothers, and wrote each a smriti separately, and another jointly, and the three now considered as only one work.
  9. manvatriviṣṇuhārīta yājñavalkya āṅgirāḥ
    yamāpastambasamvartāḥ kātyāyanabṛhaspatī
    parāśaravyāsaśaṅkhalikhita dakṣagautamo
    śātātapovaśiṣṭhaśca dharmaśastrayojakāḥ
    (Yājñavalkyasmṛti (1.4, 1.5))
    (Sanskrit: मन्वत्रिविष्णुहारीत याज्ञवल्क्योऽङ्गिराः। यमापस्तम्बसम्वर्ताः कात्यायनबृहस्पती॥ पराशरव्यासशङ्खलिखिता दक्षगौतमो।शातातपोवशिष्ठश्च धर्मशस्त्रयोजकाः॥[32])
  10. Prominent social reformer Kandukuri Veeresalingam Pantulu has quoted these slokas from Āpastambasmṛti in his Telugu essay on widow remarriage, stri punarvivāha śāstrasangrahamu.[33]
  11. यददृष्टम् हि वेदेषु तत् द्रष्टव्यं स्मृतौ किल । उभाभ्यां यददृष्टस्तु तत् पुराणेषु पठ्यते ॥
  12. श्रुतिस्मृतिपुराणोक्तधर्मयोग्यास्तु नेतरे॥
  13. धर्मं जिज्ञासमानानां प्रमाणं प्रथमं श्रुतिः । द्वितीयं धर्मशास्त्रं तु तृतीयो लोकसंग्रहः ॥
  14. Parāśarasmṛti (1.20) mentions that śrutismṛtisadācāranirṇetārśca sarvadā (Sanskrit:श्रुतिस्मृतिसदाचारनिर्णेतार्श्च सर्वदा ॥lit. means "Śruti, Smr̥ti and Sadācāra are always the deciders.")
  15. The Padma Purana as quoted in Bhakti-Sandarbhah states Śrutismr̥tī mamaivājñe yaste ullaṅghya vartate, Ājñācchedī mama dveṣī madbhakto’pi na vaiṣṇavaḥ (Sanskrit:श्रुतिस्मृती ममैवाज्ञे यस्ते उल्लङ्घ्य वर्तते । आज्ञाच्छेदी मम द्वेषी मद्भक्तोऽपि न वैष्णवः ॥lit. means "Śruti and Smr̥ti are in truth My commands. Whoever transgresses them, disobeys Me and is a hater of Me. Though a devotee, He is not a votary of Viṣṇu.").[40]
  16. upaviṣṭo dharmaḥ prativedam tasyānuvyākhyāsyāmaḥ smārto dvitīyaḥ tṛtīyaḥ śiṣṭāgamaḥ Baudhayana smriti (1.1 to 1-4)
    (Sanskrit:उपविष्टो धर्मः प्रतिवेदम्। तस्यानुव्याख्यास्यामः। स्मार्तो द्वितीयः। तृतीयः शिष्टागमः।).[41]
  17. श्रुतिः स्मृतिः सदाचारः स्वस्य च प्रियं आत्मनः । सम्यक्संकल्पजः कामो धर्ममूलं इदं स्मृतम् ॥[47]
  18. : श्रुतिस्मृति विरोधे तु श्रुतिरेव गरीयसी॥ (śrutismṛti virodhe tu śrutireva garīyasī)
  19. श्रुतिस्मृतिपुराणेषु विरुद्धेषु परस्परम् । पूर्वं पूर्वं बलीयं स्यादिति न्यायविदो विदुः ॥
  20. श्रुतिस्मृति पुराणां विरोधो यत्र द्रिश्यते । तत्र श्रोतं प्रमाणास्तु तयोर्ध्व्यधे स्मृतिर्वरा ॥[51]
  21. In 1882 Telugu essay on widow remarriage, stri punarvivāha śāstrasangrahamu


  • Davis, Jr. Donald R. Forthcoming. Spirit of Hindu Law
  • Lingat, Robert (1973), The Classical Law of India, University of California Press

Further reading

  • Domenico Francavilla (2006), The roots of hindu jurisprudence: sources of Dharma and interpretation in Mīmāṃsā and Dharmaśāstra

External links