| This page documents Bharatpedia deletion guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. |
Template:Deletion debates The deletion process covers how the community decides to delete or keep articles, media, and other pages.
Normally a deletion discussion is required to form consensus. Admins usually close these, though non-admins may also close in some cases. Editors can propose uncontroversial deletions, and pages meeting strict criteria may be speedily deleted.
Priority override: Office actions and declarations from the Foundation Board or system administrators (copyright, legal, server load) take priority over community consensus.
Speedy deletion[edit source]
Pages meeting at least one criterion for speedy deletion (CSD) may be deleted immediately without discussion.
Pre-deletion checklist:
- Verify the page meets at least one CSD criterion
- Check page history — can it be reverted and salvaged?
- Check whether a cut-and-paste move was involved
- Check the edit summary, talk page, page log, and WhatLinksHere
If CSD is not appropriate: remove the tag (auto-removes from Category:Candidates for speedy deletion) and consider notifying the nominator with {{speedy-decline}} or {{uw-csd}}.
Never quote attack content or copyrighted text in the deletion summary.
Proposed deletion[edit source]
For uncontroversial deletions that don't meet CSD. Place a tag; any editor may remove it to save the page. If the tag stands for 7 days, deletion proceeds.
BLPPROD: Unsourced biographies of living people. Only adding a source can contest this.
Copyright problems[edit source]
- Unambiguous infringement leads to G12 speedy deletion
- Repeat violators qualify for presumptive deletion after 7 days at Copyright problems
- Files whose copyright expires on a future known date should be listed at Category:Future copyright expiration
Deletion discussion venues (XfD)[edit source]
Six venues for pages that don't qualify for CSD. Starting a discussion is easiest with Twinkle.
| Venue | Scope | Links |
|---|---|---|
| AfD | Articles, mainspace pages (no redirects) | Reasons · Start · Close |
| CfD | Categories, stub templates | Reasons · Start · Close |
| FfD | Files, images | Reasons · Start · Close |
| MfD | Draft, Help, Portal, MediaWiki, Bharatpedia, User, Talk, etc. | Reasons · Start · Close |
| RfD | Redirects (all namespaces) | Reasons · Start · Close |
| TfD | Template, Module (no stubs/userboxes/redirects) | Reasons · Start · Close |
| DRV | Appeals of deletion outcomes | Reasons · Start · Close |
Group nominations: Make sure every page has an XfD notice tag. If some are missed, tag them and relist the discussion.
Conduct during discussions[edit source]
| Principle | What it means |
|---|---|
| Assume good faith | Presume others act to improve the project, until strong evidence says otherwise. |
| Not a battleground | No personal attacks, harassment, incivility, or gaming the system. |
| No canvassing | Deletion discussions are not a vote. Remind participants politely. |
| Sock-puppetry | Tag blatant cases; otherwise report and note your concern neutrally. |
Closing discussions[edit source]
Discussions run for 7 days (168 hours). Closing is usually an admin action, but experienced non-admins may close per the rules below.
Determining rough consensus[edit source]
Consensus is not headcount. Weight of argument and cited policy matter more than number of votes. Bad-faith, sock, and SPA opinions may be discounted.
Non-negotiable: Verifiability, NOR, NPOV, copyright, and BLP cannot be overruled by any discussion.
No consensus[edit source]
Result keeps the status quo — usually "keep". Note these exceptions:
| Venue | No-consensus effect |
|---|---|
| RfD | May still retarget or disambiguate |
| FfD | Admin may delete on precautionary principle |
| DRV | Effect equals endorsement; if appeal was a speedy, restore page |
No quorum and soft closure[edit source]
When no one besides the nominator comments, the closer may:
- Relist the discussion
- Close as no consensus with "no prejudice against speedy renomination" (NPASR)
- Close in favour of the nomination
- Perform a soft closure
| Soft closure type | Effect | Reversible? |
|---|---|---|
| Soft delete | Article deleted; restorable on request at REFUND | Yes, any reason |
| Soft merge | Articles merged or added to merge backlog | Yes, by splitting back |
| Soft BLAR | Blank and redirect to a target | Yes, no objections required |
Relisting[edit source]
Relist if:
- Only a few participants have commented, or
- Arguments lack policy basis, or
- Consensus may be near
Maximum two relists. A third relist requires an explanation. Long-standing tags discourage new editors.
Non-admins closing discussions[edit source]
Non-admin closers must:
- Use
{{nacd}}in the close comment - Stay within technical ability (no "delete" closes)
- Follow the accountability policy
- Leave close calls and controversial cases to admins
Do not close if: you lack policy experience, you already !voted, or you have a vested interest in the page.
Common outcomes[edit source]
| Outcome | For | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Keep | All | Remove deletion notice; record outcome on talk page |
| Delete | All | Remove incoming links if page shouldn't be recreated |
| Delete (subject-requested) | Articles | Check BP:BIODEL and BP:BLPREQUESTDELETE |
| Move / Rename | All | Change the title |
| Merge | Articles, categories, templates | !votes must be specific |
| Redirect | Articles, templates, misc | No unique content, but topic covered elsewhere |
| Disambiguate | Articles, redirects | Change to disambiguation page |
| Userfy | Articles, templates, misc | Move to creator's userspace |
| Incubate / Draftify | Articles | Move to draft for improvement |
| Delete, allow re-upload with licence | Files | Only for copyright-fixable files |
| Listify | Categories | Delete category, create list article |
| Retarget | Redirects | Point to a different page |
| Refine | Redirects | Point to a specific section |
Nomination errors[edit source]
| Error | Fix |
|---|---|
| No deletion notice on page | Add tag; tag time equals nomination time |
| Linked from Main Page | Remove tag; use Bharatpedia:Main Page/Errors first |
| Immediate objection to prior outcome | Redirect to DRV |
| Wrong venue | Move to correct venue, notify nominator |
| Page does not exist or already deleted | Close; notify nominator of correct title |
Early closure[edit source]
| Reason | When |
|---|---|
| Speedy keep | Nominator withdraws; vandalism; policy pages; banned nominators |
| Speedy redirect | Viable search term or subtopic already covered |
| Speedy delete | Meets CSD (for example G10 attack, G12 copyright) |
| Snowball | Outcome is near-certain — but not for merely "likely" |
}
Snowball caveat: Do not mistake an early pile-on for the final outcome — wait for slower, less-involved editors too.
Search all deletion discussions[edit source]
Preview this line in any page's wikitext to generate three search links:
{{ #lst: BP: Deletion process | search links }}
Pages with many revisions[edit source]
Pages with 5,000+ revisions require the special "bigdelete" right (admins do not have it). Close as "delete" and request a steward to perform it.
Notes[edit source]
See also[edit source]
- Bharatpedia:Alternative outlets
- Bharatpedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- Bharatpedia:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
- Bharatpedia:Deletion and deletionism
- Category:Deletion archival templates
- Bharatpedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators
- Bharatpedia:Deletion policy
- Bharatpedia:Undeletion policy
- Bharatpedia:Articles for deletion/Precedents
- Bharatpedia:List of policies to cite in deletion debates
- Bharatpedia:Mass nomination
- Bharatpedia:Page blanking
- Bharatpedia:Relist bias
- Bharatpedia:Deletion reform