Premiership of Narendra Modi: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{for timeline|Timeline of the premiership of Narendra Modi}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} {{use Indian English|date=December 2016}} {{Infobox administration | image = File...")
 
m (Removed empty portal template using script)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Current Indian Prime Minister}}
{{for timeline|Timeline of the premiership of Narendra Modi}}
{{for timeline|Timeline of the premiership of Narendra Modi}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}}
{{use Indian English|date=December 2016}}
{{use Indian English|date=December 2016}}
{{Infobox administration
{{Infobox administration
| image = File:Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi official portrait, 2021.jpg
| image = File:Official portrait of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, November 2020 (cropped).jpg  
| name = Premiership of Narendra Modi
| name = Premiership of Narendra Modi
| premier = [[Narendra Modi]]
| premier = [[Narendra Modi]]
| premier_link = Prime Minister of India
| premier_link = Prime Minister of India
| term_start = 26 May 2014
| term_start = 26 May 2014
| term_end = Present
| term_end =  
| primeminister =
| primeminister =
| party = [[Bharatiya Janata Party]]
| party = [[Bharatiya Janata Party]]
Line 28: Line 29:
| cabinet1 = [[First Modi ministry|First]]
| cabinet1 = [[First Modi ministry|First]]
| cabinet2 = [[Second Modi ministry|Second]]
| cabinet2 = [[Second Modi ministry|Second]]
|seal_size=180px}}
}}
[[Narendra Modi]] was [[First swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi|sworn in as the Prime Minister of India]] on 26 May 2014 at the [[Rashtrapati Bhavan]]. He became the 14th [[Prime Minister of India|Prime Minister]] of [[India]].<ref name="TOI-20140520">{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Home/Lok-Sabha-Elections-2014/News/Narendra-Modi-appointed-Prime-Minister-swearing-in-on-May-26/articleshow/35388297.cms|title=Narendra Modi appointed Prime Minister, swearing in on May 26|date=20 May 2014|work=The Times of India|access-date=21 May 2014}}</ref> His first cabinet consisted of 45 ministers, 25 fewer than the previous UPA government.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-narendra-modi-saves-rs-125-crore-by-keeping-cabinet-small-1991782|title=Narendra Modi saves Rs 125 crore by keeping Cabinet small|work=dna}}</ref> 21 new ministers were added to the council of ministers in November 2014.<ref name="Ruparelia"/>
The '''premiership of Narendra Modi''' began on 26 May 2014 with his [[First swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi|swearing-in]] as the [[Prime Minister]] of [[India]] at the [[Rashtrapati Bhavan]]. He became the 14th [[Prime Minister of India]],<ref name="TOI-20140520">{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Home/Lok-Sabha-Elections-2014/News/Narendra-Modi-appointed-Prime-Minister-swearing-in-on-May-26/articleshow/35388297.cms|title=Narendra Modi appointed Prime Minister, swearing in on May 26|date=20 May 2014|work=[[The Times of India]]|access-date=21 May 2014}}</ref> succeeding [[Manmohan Singh]] of the [[Indian National Congress]]. [[Narendra Modi|Modi]]'s first cabinet consisted of 45 ministers, 25 fewer than the previous [[United Progressive Alliance]] government.<ref>{{cite web|first=Hakeem|last=Irfan|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-narendra-modi-saves-rs-125-crore-by-keeping-cabinet-small-1991782|title=Narendra Modi saves Rs 125 crore by keeping Cabinet small|date=May 28, 2014|access-date=October 17, 2021|work=[[Dnaindia.com]]}}</ref> 21 ministers were added to the council of ministers on 9 November 2014.<ref name="Ruparelia"/>


On 24 May 2019, he was elected as the [[Prime Minister of India]] for the [[Second swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi|second time]] consecutively at the [[Rashtrapati Bhavan]].<ref>{{Cite web|author=Staff Writer|date=2019-05-30|title=Modi Swearing-in Highlights: New team blend of youthful energy, experience: PM|url=https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/pm-narendra-modi-swearing-in-oath-ceremony-live-updates-1559197877056.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Mint (newspaper)|Live mint]]|language=en}}</ref> His [[Second Modi ministry|second cabinet]] consisted of 54 ministers<ref>{{Cite web|title=Who Gets What: Cabinet Portfolios Announced. Full List Here|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/cabinet-portfolios-pm-narendra-modis-new-cabinet-ministers-and-their-portfolios-see-full-list-here-2045883|access-date=2021-01-10|website=NDTV.com}}</ref> and has currently 51 ministers.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-09-23|title=Narendra Singh Tomar Takes Additional Charge of Food Processing Ministry After Harshimrat Badal Resigns|url=https://www.news18.com/news/politics/narendra-singh-tomar-takes-additional-charge-of-food-processing-ministry-after-harshimrat-badal-resigns-2902557.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=News18|language=en}}</ref>
In 2019, he was elected as the [[Prime Minister of India]] for the second time and [[Second swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi|sworn in]] at the [[Rashtrapati Bhavan]] on 30 May 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-05-30|title=Modi Swearing-in Highlights: New team blend of youthful energy, experience: PM|url=https://www.livemint.com/politics/news/pm-narendra-modi-swearing-in-oath-ceremony-live-updates-1559197877056.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Mint (newspaper)|Live Mint]]|language=en}}</ref> His [[Second Modi ministry|second cabinet]] consisted of 54 ministers<ref>{{Cite web|title=Who Gets What: Cabinet Portfolios Announced. Full List Here|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/cabinet-portfolios-pm-narendra-modis-new-cabinet-ministers-and-their-portfolios-see-full-list-here-2045883|access-date=2021-01-10|publisher=[[NDTV]]}}</ref> and initially had 51 ministers, which was expanded to 77 ministers during a [[2021 Indian cabinet reshuffle|reshuffle]] on 7 July 2021.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-09-23|title=Narendra Singh Tomar Takes Additional Charge of Food Processing Ministry After Harshimrat Badal Resigns|url=https://www.news18.com/news/politics/narendra-singh-tomar-takes-additional-charge-of-food-processing-ministry-after-harshimrat-badal-resigns-2902557.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[News18]]|language=en}}</ref> His premiership has, to a considerable extent, practiced [[high command culture]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Frequent change of CMs in BJP-ruled states signs of growing high command culture|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2021/sep/11/frequent-change-of-cms-in-bjp-ruled-states-signs-of-growing-high-command-culture-2357361.html|access-date=2021-11-05|website=The New Indian Express}}</ref>


{{Narendra Modi series}}
{{Narendra Modi series}}
Line 37: Line 38:
== Economic policies ==
== Economic policies ==
===Overall===
===Overall===
The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatization and liberalization of the economy, based on a [[neoliberal]] framework.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref name="Shah & Lerche">{{cite journal|last1=Shah|first1=Alpa|last2=Lerche|first2=Jens|title=India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion|journal=Economic & Political Weekly|date=10 October 2015|volume=50|issue=41|pages=33–36}}</ref> Modi liberalized India's [[foreign direct investment]] policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defense and the railways.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/11/10/india-reforms-idINKCN0SZ18J20151110|title=India frees up foreign investment in 15 major sectors|work=Reuters India}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector | work=The Times Of India | title=Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 per cent, opens up railways | date=7 August 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 | work=The Wall Street Journal | first=Raymond | last=Zhong | title=Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough? | date=20 November 2014}}</ref> Other reforms included removing many of the country's labor laws, to make it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them.<ref name="Shah & Lerche"/> These reforms met with support from institutions such as the [[World Bank]], but opposition from scholars within the country. The labor laws also drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.<ref name="Shah & Lerche"/> The [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]], a constituent of the Sangh Parihar, stated that the reforms would hurt laborers by making it easier for corporations to exploit them.<ref name="Ruparelia"/>
The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatization and liberalization of the economy, based on a [[neoliberal]] framework.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref name="Shah & Lerche">{{cite journal|last1=Shah|first1=Alpa|last2=Lerche|first2=Jens|url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html|title=India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion|journal=[[Economic & Political Weekly]]|date=10 October 2015|volume=50|issue=41|pages=33–36|access-date=October 23, 2021}}</ref> Modi liberalized India's [[foreign direct investment]] policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defense and the railways.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref>{{cite web|first=Sanjeev|last=Miglani|first2=Krishna N.|last2=Das|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/india-reforms-idINKCN0SZ18J20151110|title=India frees up foreign investment in 15 major sectors|work=[[Reuters India]]|date=November 10, 2015|access-date=October 10, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/cabinet-approves-raising-fdi-cap-in-defence-to-49-per-cent-opens-up-railways/articleshow/39767641.cms | work=[[The Economic Times]] | title=Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 per cent, opens up railways | date=7 August 2014 |access-date=17 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742 | work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | first=Raymond | last=Zhong | title=Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough? | date=20 November 2014 |access-date=17 October 2021}}</ref> Other reforms included removing many of the country's labor laws, to make it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them.<ref name="Shah & Lerche"/> These reforms met with support from institutions such as the [[World Bank]], but opposition from scholars within the country. The labor laws also drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.<ref name="Shah & Lerche"/> The [[Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh]], a constituent of the Sangh Parihar, stated that the reforms would hurt laborers by making it easier for corporations to exploit them.<ref name="Ruparelia"/>


In his first budget, Finance Minister [[Arun Jaitley]] promised to gradually reduce the budgetary deficit from 4.1% to 3% over two years and to divest from shares in public banks.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> Over Modi's first year in office, the Indian GDP grew at a rate of 7.5%, making it the fastest-growing large economy.<ref name="Shah & Lerche"/> For this the basis was a revised formula introduced a year after he took office, which surprised a lot of economists.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-changes-gdp-calculation-method-1422622762|title=India Changes GDP Calculation Method|website=Wall Street Journal}}</ref> However, this rate of growth had fallen significantly to 6.1%, even by the revised metric, by his third year in office.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/gdp-growth-slows-to-6-1-in-jan-march-indian-economy-finally-bares-its-demonetisation-scars/story-FrSaWcT17v3FdysjtuPdWO.html|title=GDP growth slows to 6.1% in Jan-March: Indian economy finally bares its demonetisation scars|website=Hindustan Times}}</ref> This fall has been blamed on the exercise of demonetisation of currency.<ref name=":0" />
In his first budget, Finance Minister [[Arun Jaitley]] promised to gradually reduce the budgetary deficit from 4.1% to 3% over two years and to divest from shares in public banks.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> Over Modi's first year in office, the Indian GDP grew at a rate of 7.5%, making it the fastest-growing large economy.<ref name="Shah & Lerche"/> For this the basis was a revised formula introduced a year after he took office, which surprised a lot of economists.<ref>{{Cite web|first=Raymond|last=Zhong|first2=Anant Vijay|last2=Kala|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-changes-gdp-calculation-method-1422622762|title=India Changes GDP Calculation Method|website=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|date=January 30, 2015|access-date=October 17, 2021}}</ref> However, this rate of growth had fallen significantly to 6.1%, even by the revised metric, by his third year in office.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/gdp-growth-slows-to-6-1-in-jan-march-indian-economy-finally-bares-its-demonetisation-scars/story-FrSaWcT17v3FdysjtuPdWO.html|title=GDP growth slows to 6.1% in Jan-March: Indian economy finally bares its demonetisation scars|website=[[Hindustan Times]]|date=June 1, 2017|access-date=October 17, 2021}}</ref> This fall has been blamed on the exercise of demonetisation of currency.<ref name=":0" />


The funds dedicated to poverty reduction programs and social welfare measures was greatly decreased by the Modi administration.<ref name="Manor"/> The money spent on social programs declined from 14.6% of GDP during the Congress government to 12.6% during Modi's first year in office.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> Spending on health and family welfare declined by 15%, and on primary and secondary education, by 16%.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The budgetary allocation for the [[Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan]], or the "education for all" program, declined by 22%.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The government also lowered corporate taxes, abolished the wealth tax, and reduced customs duties on gold, jewelry, and increased sales taxes.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> In October 2014, the Modi government deregulated diesel prices,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/narendra-modi-government-deregulates-diesel-prices-681104|title=Narendra Modi Government Deregulates Diesel Prices|first=Rahul|last=Shrivastava|date=18 October 2014|work=NDTV.com}}</ref> and later increased taxes on diesel and petrol.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> In July 2014, Modi refused to sign a trade agreement that would permit the [[World Trade Organization]] to implement a deal agreed in Bali, citing a lack of protection to Indian farmers and the needs of food security.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The addition to Indian airports grew by 23 percent in 2016 while the airfares dropped by over 25 percent.{{sfn|Mahurkar|2017|p=3}}
The funds dedicated to poverty reduction programs and social welfare measures was greatly decreased by the Modi administration.<ref name="Manor"/> The money spent on social programs declined from 14.6% of GDP during the Congress government to 12.6% during Modi's first year in office.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> Spending on health and family welfare declined by 15%, and on primary and secondary education, by 16%.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The budgetary allocation for the [[Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan]], or the "education for all" program, declined by 22%.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The government also lowered corporate taxes, abolished the wealth tax, and reduced customs duties on gold, jewelry, and increased sales taxes.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> In October 2014, the Modi government deregulated diesel prices,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/narendra-modi-government-deregulates-diesel-prices-681104|title=Narendra Modi Government Deregulates Diesel Prices|first=Rahul|last=Shrivastava|date=18 October 2014|access-date=17 October 2021|publisher=[[NDTV]]}}</ref> and later increased taxes on diesel and petrol.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> In July 2014, Modi refused to sign a trade agreement that would permit the [[World Trade Organization]] to implement a deal agreed in Bali, citing lack of protection to Indian farmers and the needs of food security.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The addition to Indian airports grew by 23 percent in 2016 while the airfares dropped by over 25 percent.{{sfn|Mahurkar|2017|p=3}}


[[File:Narendra Modi launches Make in India.jpg|thumb|Modi at the launch of the ''[[Make in India]]'' program.|left|264x264px]]
[[File:Narendra Modi launches Make in India.jpg|thumb|Modi at the launch of the ''[[Make in India]]'' program.|left|264x264px]]
In September 2014, Modi introduced the [[Make in India]] initiative to encourage foreign companies to manufacture products in India, with the goal of turning India into a global manufacturing hub.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/live-coverage-launch-of-modi-s-make-in-india-campaign/article1-1268119.aspx|title=Look East, Link West, says PM Modi at Make in India launch|work=hindustantimes.com/}}</ref> Supporters of economic liberalisation supported the initiative, while critics argued it would allow foreign corporations to capture a greater share of the Indian market.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> In order to enable the construction of private industrial corridors, the Modi administration passed a land-reform bill that allowed it to acquire private agricultural land without conducting a social impact assessment, and without the consent of the farmers who owned it.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Guha|first1=Abhijit|title=Dangers of Indian Reform of the Colonial Land Acquisition Law|journal=Global Journal of Human-Social Science|date=2015|volume=15|issue=1}}</ref> Under the previous bill, the government had required the consent of 80% of the owners of a piece of property before acquiring it for a private project: this requirement was waived.<ref name="Ronojoy"/> The bill was passed via an executive order after it faced opposition in parliament, but was eventually allowed to lapse.<ref name="Ronojoy"/>
In September 2014, Modi introduced the [[Make in India]] initiative to encourage foreign companies to manufacture products in India, with the goal of turning India into a global manufacturing hub.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref>{{cite web|first=Gaurav|last=Choudhury|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/look-east-link-west-says-pm-modi-at-make-in-india-launch/story-mGj6f6mlUmos0BAi27Rl1O.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150927051617/https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/look-east-link-west-says-pm-modi-at-make-in-india-launch/story-mGj6f6mlUmos0BAi27Rl1O.html|url-status=live|archive-date=27 September 2014|title=Look East, Link West, says PM Modi at Make in India launch|work=[[Hindustan Times]]}}</ref> Supporters of economic liberalisation supported the initiative, while critics argued it would allow foreign corporations to capture a greater share of the Indian market.<ref name="Ruparelia"/> In order to enable the construction of private industrial corridors, the Modi administration passed a land-reform bill that allowed it to acquire private agricultural land without conducting a social impact assessment, and without the consent of the farmers who owned it.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Guha|first1=Abhijit|url=https://globaljournals.org/item/4451-dangers-of-indian-reform-of-the-colonial-land-acquisition-law|title=Dangers of Indian Reform of the Colonial Land Acquisition Law|journal=Global Journal of Human-Social Science|date=2015|volume=15|issue=1}}</ref> Under the previous bill, the government had required the consent of 80% of the owners of a piece of property before acquiring it for a private project: this requirement was waived.<ref name="Ronojoy"/> The bill was passed via an executive order after it faced opposition in parliament, but was eventually allowed to lapse.<ref name="Ronojoy"/>


The government substantially increased the percentage of central revenue directly granted to states, while decreasing the amount granted through various central government programs. Overall, states' share of revenue increased marginally.<ref name="Manor">{{cite journal|last1=Manor|first1=James|title=A Precarious Enterprise? Multiple Antagonisms during Year One of the Modi Government|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=736–754|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1083644|s2cid=155472230}}</ref> The criteria upon which individual states' allocation was determined were changed, such that the revenue to 19 states increased, and that of 10 states decreased. Only one of the ten states was ruled by the BJP when the policy was enacted.<ref name="Manor"/>
The government substantially increased the percentage of central revenue directly granted to states, while decreasing the amount granted through various central government programs. Overall, states' share of revenue increased marginally.<ref name="Manor">{{cite journal|last1=Manor|first1=James|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00856401.2015.1083644?journalCode=csas20|title=A Precarious Enterprise? Multiple Antagonisms during Year One of the Modi Government|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=736–754|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1083644|s2cid=155472230}}</ref> The criteria upon which individual states' allocation was determined were changed, such that the revenue to 19 states increased, and that of 10 states decreased. Only one of the ten states was ruled by the BJP when the policy was enacted.<ref name="Manor"/>


The government signed large deals with [[General Electric]] and [[Alstom]] to supply India with 1,000 new diesel locomotives, as part of an effort to reform the Indian railway, which also included privatisation efforts.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://money.cnn.com/2015/11/10/news/india-railways-ge/|title=GE to build 1,000 trains for India in massive deal|first=Charles|last=Riley|date=10 November 2015|work=CNNMoney}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-09/ge-wins-2-6-billion-contract-to-make-1-000-locomotives-in-india|title=India's $5.6 Billion GE, Alstom Deals Step Up Rail Overhaul|first=Adi|last=Narayan|date=9 November 2015|work=Bloomberg.com}}</ref> In December 2015, Modi's government signed an agreement with [[Japan]] to jointly build a [[High-speed rail|bullet train]] system linking [[Mumbai]] and [[Ahmedabad]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-35086944|title=Japan and India sign bullet train deal amid closer ties|work=BBC News}}</ref> The Indian government put forward a plan on converting 101 rivers into national waterways for the transport of goods and passengers. The government also began an ambitious program to increase the number of highways in the country,<ref>{{cite news| url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-05-25/news/62624528_1_road-ministry-connectivity-road-transport | work=The Times Of India | title=Infrastructure push: Modi government steps up to improve roads, increase connectivity | date=25 May 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/pm-modi-speeds-up-spending-on-roads-railways-and-rural-infra-in-april-to-boost-economic-growth/article1-1352764.aspx |title=PM Modi speeds up capital spending on roads, rural infrastructure, railways in April to boost growth &#124; business |publisher=Hindustan Times |date=29 May 2015 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref> allocating {{INRConvert|700|b}} to the project.<ref name="Ruparelia"/>
The government signed large deals with [[General Electric]] and [[Alstom]] to supply India with 1,000 new diesel locomotives, as part of an effort to reform the Indian railway, which also included privatisation efforts.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://money.cnn.com/2015/11/10/news/india-railways-ge/|title=GE to build 1,000 trains for India in massive deal|first=Charles|last=Riley|date=10 November 2015|access-date=17 October 2021|work=[[CNNMoney]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-09/ge-wins-2-6-billion-contract-to-make-1-000-locomotives-in-india|title=India's $5.6 Billion GE, Alstom Deals Step Up Rail Overhaul|first=Adi|last=Narayan|date=9 November 2015|access-date=17 October 2021|work=[[Bloomberg.com]]}}</ref> In December 2015, Modi's government signed an agreement with [[Japan]] to jointly build a [[High-speed rail|bullet train]] system linking [[Mumbai]] and [[Ahmedabad]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-35086944|title=Japan and India sign bullet train deal amid closer ties|work=[[BBC News]]|date=13 December 2015|access-date=17 October 2021}}</ref> The Indian government put forward a plan on converting 101 rivers into national waterways for the transport of goods and passengers. The government also began an ambitious program to increase the number of highways in the country,<ref>{{cite news|first=Ruchika |last=Chitravanshi |first2=Deepshikha |last2=Sikarwar |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/infrastructure-push-modi-government-steps-up-to-improve-roads-increase-connectivity/articleshow/47409210.cms?from=mdr | work=[[The Economic Times]] | title=Infrastructure push: Modi government steps up to improve roads, increase connectivity | date=25 May 2015 |access-date=17 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/pm-modi-speeds-up-spending-on-roads-railways-and-rural-infra-in-april-to-boost-economic-growth/article1-1352764.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150530064724/http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/pm-modi-speeds-up-spending-on-roads-railways-and-rural-infra-in-april-to-boost-economic-growth/article1-1352764.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-date=30 May 2015 |title=PM Modi speeds up capital spending on roads, rural infrastructure, railways in April to boost growth|work=[[Hindustan Times]] |date=29 May 2015 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref> allocating {{INRConvert|700|b}} to the project.<ref name="Ruparelia"/>


On 25 June 2015, Modi launched a program intended to develop 100 [[Smart city|smart cities]].<ref name="SmartCity">{{cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/prime-minister-narendra-modi-launches-smart-cities-mission/article7353823.ece | title=Cities should get chance to plan their growth, says Modi | date=25 June 2015 | agency=The Hindu | access-date=27 June 2015 | location=New Delhi}}</ref> The "Smart Cities" program is expected to bring IT companies an extra benefit of {{INRConvert|20|b}}.<ref name=Kaushik/> He also launched a "smart villages" initiative, under which villages would be given Internet access, clean water, sanitation, and low-carbon energy, with Members of Parliament overseeing the program's implementation. The program had a stated goal of at least 2,500 smart villages by 2019.<ref name="Kaushik">{{cite web|first=Preetam |last=Kaushik |url=http://www.businessinsider.in/Smart-Villages-Lending-A-Rural-Flavour-To-Modis-Growth-Agenda/articleshow/45271399.cms |title=Smart Villages: Lending A Rural Flavour To Modi's Growth Agenda &#124; Business Insider India |publisher=Businessinsider.in |date=25 November 2014 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref>
On 25 June 2015, Modi launched a program intended to develop 100 [[Smart city|smart cities]].<ref name="SmartCity">{{cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/prime-minister-narendra-modi-launches-smart-cities-mission/article7353823.ece | title=Cities should get chance to plan their growth, says Modi | date=25 June 2015 | work=[[The Hindu]] | access-date=27 June 2015 | location=New Delhi}}</ref> The "Smart Cities" program is expected to bring IT companies an extra benefit of {{INRConvert|20|b}}.<ref name=Kaushik/> He also launched a "smart villages" initiative, under which villages would be given Internet access, clean water, sanitation, and low-carbon energy, with Members of Parliament overseeing the program's implementation. The program had a stated goal of at least 2,500 smart villages by 2019.<ref name="Kaushik">{{cite web|first=Preetam |last=Kaushik |url=http://www.businessinsider.in/Smart-Villages-Lending-A-Rural-Flavour-To-Modis-Growth-Agenda/articleshow/45271399.cms |title=Smart Villages: Lending A Rural Flavour To Modi's Growth Agenda |publisher=[[Business Insider|Businessinsider.in]] |date=25 November 2014 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref>


Give up LPG subsidy is a campaign launched in March 2015 by the [[Indian government]] led by [[Narendra Modi]]. It is aimed at motivating [[Liquefied petroleum gas|LPG]] users who can afford to pay the market price for LPG to voluntarily surrender their LPG subsidy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.givitup.in/about.html|title=About - #GiveItUp}}</ref> As at 23 April 2016 1 crore ( 10 million) people had voluntarily given up the subsidy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/pm-thanks-1-crore-people-giving-lpg-subsidy-help-poor/|title=PM thanks 1 crore people for giving up LPG subsidy to help poor|date=23 April 2016}}</ref>
Give up LPG subsidy is a campaign launched in March 2015 by the [[Indian government]] led by [[Narendra Modi]]. It is aimed at motivating [[Liquefied petroleum gas|LPG]] users who can afford to pay the market price for LPG to voluntarily surrender their LPG subsidy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.givitup.in/about.html|title=About the GiveItUp Campaign|publisher=[[Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas]]|access-date=19 October 2021}}</ref> As at 23 April 2016 1 crore ( 10 million) people had voluntarily given up the subsidy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/pm-thanks-1-crore-people-giving-lpg-subsidy-help-poor/|title=PM thanks 1 crore people for giving up LPG subsidy to help poor|date=23 April 2016|access-date=19 October 2021}}</ref>
The surrendered subsidy is being used by the government to provide cooking gas connections to poor families in rural households free of cost.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/oil-gas/give-it-up-over-1-crore-lpg-users-gave-up-their-subsidies/articleshow/51929960.cms|title=Give-it-Up: Over 1 crore LPG users gave up their subsidies - The Economic Times}}</ref> [[Maharashtra]], [[Uttar Pradesh]], [[Karnataka]], [[Delhi]] and [[Tamil Nadu]] are the top five states to give up the subsidy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/maharashtra-leads-in-surrendering-lpg-subsidy-2766427/|title=Maharashtra leads in surrendering LPG subsidy|date=23 April 2016}}</ref>
The surrendered subsidy is being used by the government to provide cooking gas connections to poor families in rural households free of cost.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/oil-gas/give-it-up-over-1-crore-lpg-users-gave-up-their-subsidies/articleshow/51929960.cms|title=Give-it-Up: Over 1 crore LPG users gave up their subsidies|newspaper=[[The Economic Times]]|date=12 April 2016|access-date=19 October 2021}}</ref> [[Maharashtra]], [[Uttar Pradesh]], [[Karnataka]], [[Delhi]] and [[Tamil Nadu]] are the top five states to give up the subsidy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/maharashtra-leads-in-surrendering-lpg-subsidy-2766427/|title=Maharashtra leads in surrendering LPG subsidy|work=[[The Indian Express]]|date=23 April 2016|access-date=19 October 2021}}</ref>


In his regime Railway budget was merged into the [[Union Budget of India]]. The date of presenting budget was moved from 28 to 1 February and financial cycle was changed from July to April. Further, the artificial distinction between planned and non-planned expenditure was removed. Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), considered as a hurdle in FDI, was scrapped by Modi government.<ref>{{citation |title=3 years of PM Narendra Modi: Here's how NDA government performed on economic front |url=http://m.indiatoday.in/story/narendra-modi-bharatiya-janata-party-nda-government-third-anniversary-economy/1/963861.html |work=[[India Today]] |date=26 May 2017 }}</ref>
Under his government, Railway budget was merged into the [[Union Budget of India]]. The date of presenting budget was moved from 28 to 1 February and financial cycle was changed from July to April. Further, the artificial distinction between planned and non-planned expenditure was removed. Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), considered as a hurdle in FDI, was scrapped by the Modi government.<ref>{{citation |first=Prabhash K. |last=Dutta |title=3 years of PM Narendra Modi: Here's how NDA government performed on economic front |url=http://m.indiatoday.in/story/narendra-modi-bharatiya-janata-party-nda-government-third-anniversary-economy/1/963861.html |work=[[India Today]] |date=26 May 2017 |access-date=19 October 2021}}</ref>


Modi government put in place the [[Goods and Services Tax (India)|Goods and Services Tax]], the biggest tax reform in the country since independence. It subsumed around 17 different taxes and became effective from 1 July 2017.<ref>{{citation |title=3 years of Modi govt: 6 economic policies that have made BJP stronger, harder to defeat |url=http://m.businesstoday.in/story/from-demonetisation-to-gst-heres-what-pm-modi-did-on-economic-reforms-in-last-3-years-in-office/1/252249.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=16 May 2017 }}</ref>
In 2017, Modi government put in place the [[Goods and Services Tax (India)|Goods and Services Tax]], the biggest tax reform in the country since independence. It subsumed around 17 different taxes and became effective from 1 July 2017.<ref>{{citation |title=3 years of Modi govt: 6 economic policies that have made BJP stronger, harder to defeat |url=http://m.businesstoday.in/story/from-demonetisation-to-gst-heres-what-pm-modi-did-on-economic-reforms-in-last-3-years-in-office/1/252249.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=16 May 2017 |access-date=19 October 2021}}</ref>


Over the first four years of Modi's premiership, India's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.23%, higher than the rate of 6.39% under the previous government.<ref name="BT Feb 20192">{{cite news|date=1 February 2019|title=Budget 2019: Who gave India a higher GDP – Modi or Manmohan?|work=Business Times|url=https://www.businesstoday.in/budget-2019/news/budget-2019-indian-economy-gdp-growth-rate-under-narendra-modi-manmohan-singh/story/315848.html|access-date=6 February 2019}}</ref> The level of income inequality increased,<ref name="CNBC Nov 20182">{{cite news|last1=V.|first1=Harini|date=14 November 2018|title=India's economy is booming. Now comes the hard part|publisher=CNBC|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/15/india-economy-modi-faces-inequality-black-money-and-taxes.html|access-date=6 February 2019}}</ref> while an internal government report said that in 2017, unemployment had increased to its highest level in 45 years. The loss of jobs was attributed to the 2016 demonetisation, and to the effects of the Goods and Services Tax.<ref name="NYT Jan 20192">{{cite news|last1=Gettleman|first1=Jeffrey|last2=Kumar|first2=Hari|date=31 January 2019|title=India's Leader Is Accused of Hiding Unemployment Data Before Vote|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/world/asia/india-unemployment-rate.html|access-date=7 February 2019}}</ref><ref name="Reuters Jan 20192">{{cite news|last1=Kumar|first1=Manoj|last2=Ghoshal|first2=Devjyot|title=Indian jobless rate at multi-decade high, report says, in blow to Modi|work=Reuters|url=https://in.reuters.com/article/us-india-economy-jobs/indian-jobless-rate-at-multi-decade-high-report-says-in-blow-to-modi-idINKCN1PP0FX|access-date=7 February 2019}}</ref> he last year of Modi didn't see much big development and economic development and focused on the policies of Defence and on the basic formula of [[Hindutva]].{{Sfn|Miller|2020|p=67i}} His government made a basic focus on the pension facilities for old-age group people and depressed sections of the society.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Sengupta|first=Hindol|title=The economic mind of Narendra Modi|url=https://www.orfonline.org/research/economic-mind-narendra-modi-56004/|access-date=2021-01-14|website=ORF|language=en-US}}</ref> The growth rate of 2018-19 was at rate of 6.1%, which was lower than average rate of the first four years of premiership.<ref>{{Cite news|title=GDP growth rate for 2018-19 revised downwards to 6.1 pc|work=[[The Economic Times]]|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/gdp-growth-rate-for-2018-19-revised-downwards-to-6-1-pc/articleshow/73808214.cms?from=mdr|access-date=2021-01-14}}</ref> It was assumed to be a fail circumstance due to 2016 demonetisation and to the effect of the [[Goods and Services Tax (India)|GST]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mishra|first=Asit Ranjan|date=2019-01-10|title=What India GDP growth rate forecast for 2018-19 means|url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/zxNzYKQfLHUCB2yR3vKE8J/What-India-GDP-growth-rate-forecast-for-2018-19-means.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116102219/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/zxNzYKQfLHUCB2yR3vKE8J/What-India-GDP-growth-rate-forecast-for-2018-19-means.html|archive-date=16 January 2021|access-date=2021-01-14|website=[[Mint (newspaper)|mint]]|language=en}}</ref> In the year 2020, due to the [[COVID-19 lockdown in India|nationwide lockdown]] and shutdown of the industries, the [[Indian economy]] suffered a [[Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India|major economic loss]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Young Indian startups hit as investors get cautious|url=https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/young-indian-startups-hit-as-investors-get-cautious/1787866|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2021-01-15|website=[[Outlook India|Outlook]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=The Indian Economic Journal - Volume 68, Number 2, Jun 01, 2020|language=en-US|work=SAGE Journals|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/iej/current|access-date=2021-01-15}}</ref> There had a historic fall of -23% rate of the [[Gross domestic product|GDP]],<ref>{{Cite web|title=Journal Press India|url=https://www.journalpressindia.com/pragati-journal-of-indian-economy|access-date=2021-01-15|website=www.journalpressindia.com|language=en}}</ref> following this Prime Minister Modi launched new movement of [[Atmanirbhar Bharat]] and other movement and schemes to support the small scale and indigenous business to support the economy and boycotting the [[Chinese Communist Party|Chinese products]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Yunus|first=Muhammad|author-link=Muhammad Yunus|date=2020-05-05|title=Muhammad Yunus: Don't plan for economic 'recovery' post-Covid. Redesign it from scratch|url=https://theprint.in/opinion/muhammad-yunus-dont-plan-for-economic-recovery-post-covid-redesign-it-from-scratch/414357/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121180607/https://theprint.in/opinion/muhammad-yunus-dont-plan-for-economic-recovery-post-covid-redesign-it-from-scratch/414357/|archive-date=2020-11-21|access-date=2021-01-15|website=[[ThePrint]]|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Chaudhary|first1=Monika|last2=Sodani|first2=P. R.|last3=Das|first3=Shankar|date=2020-06-01|title=Effect of COVID-19 on Economy in India: Some Reflections for Policy and Programme|journal=Journal of Health Management|language=en|volume=22|issue=2|pages=169–180|doi=10.1177/0972063420935541|issn=0972-0634|doi-access=free}}</ref> Following to this Prime Minister Modi also announced a scheme of {{INRConvert|20|lc|lk=on|year=2020}} as a relief package for damaged economy.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-05-13|title=PM Modi Speech Highlights: To battle Covid-19, Rs 20,00,000 crore economic package|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/coronavirus-india-lockdown-live-news-updates-pm-modi-address-to-nation-speech-today-lockdown-extension-6406297/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210109130908/https://indianexpress.com/article/india/coronavirus-india-lockdown-live-news-updates-pm-modi-address-to-nation-speech-today-lockdown-extension-6406297/|archive-date=2021-09-13|access-date=2021-01-15|website=[[The Indian Express]]|language=en}}</ref>
Over the first four years of Modi's premiership, India's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.23%, higher than the rate of 6.39% under the previous government.<ref name="BT Feb 2019">{{cite news|date=1 February 2019|title=Budget 2019: Who gave India a higher GDP – Modi or Manmohan?|work=[[Business Today (India)|Business Today]]|url=https://www.businesstoday.in/budget-2019/news/budget-2019-indian-economy-gdp-growth-rate-under-narendra-modi-manmohan-singh/story/315848.html|access-date=6 February 2019}}</ref> The level of income inequality increased,<ref name="CNBC Nov 2018">{{cite news|last1=V.|first1=Harini|date=14 November 2018|title=India's economy is booming. Now comes the hard part|publisher=[[CNBC]]|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/15/india-economy-modi-faces-inequality-black-money-and-taxes.html|access-date=6 February 2019}}</ref> while an internal government report said that in 2017, unemployment had increased to its highest level in 45 years. The loss of jobs was attributed to the 2016 demonetisation, and to the effects of the Goods and Services Tax.<ref name="NYT Jan 2019">{{cite news|last1=Gettleman|first1=Jeffrey|last2=Kumar|first2=Hari|date=31 January 2019|title=India's Leader Is Accused of Hiding Unemployment Data Before Vote|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/world/asia/india-unemployment-rate.html|access-date=7 February 2019}}</ref><ref name="Reuters Jan 2019">{{cite news|last1=Kumar|first1=Manoj|last2=Ghoshal|first2=Devjyot|title=Indian jobless rate at multi-decade high, report says, in blow to Modi|work=[[Reuters]]|url=https://in.reuters.com/article/us-india-economy-jobs/indian-jobless-rate-at-multi-decade-high-report-says-in-blow-to-modi-idINKCN1PP0FX|date=31 January 2019|access-date=7 February 2019}}</ref> The last year of Modi's first term didn't see much economic development and focused on the policies of Defence and on the basic formula of [[Hindutva]].{{Sfn|Miller|2020|p=67i}} His government focused on pension facilities for old-age group people and depressed sections of society.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Sengupta|first=Hindol|title=The economic mind of Narendra Modi|url=https://www.orfonline.org/research/economic-mind-narendra-modi-56004/|date=October 2019|access-date=2021-01-14|website=[[Observer Research Foundation]]|language=en-US}}</ref> The economic growth rate in 2018-19 was recorded to be 6.1%, which was lower than the average rate of the first four years of premiership.<ref>{{Cite news|title=GDP growth rate for 2018-19 revised downwards to 6.1 pc|work=[[The Economic Times]]|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/gdp-growth-rate-for-2018-19-revised-downwards-to-6-1-pc/articleshow/73808214.cms?from=mdr|date=2020-02-01|access-date=2021-01-14}}</ref> The fall in the growth rate was again attributed to the 2016 demonetisation and to the effects of the [[Goods and Services Tax (India)|GST]]<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mishra|first=Asit Ranjan|date=2019-01-10|title=What India GDP growth rate forecast for 2018-19 means|url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/zxNzYKQfLHUCB2yR3vKE8J/What-India-GDP-growth-rate-forecast-for-2018-19-means.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116102219/https://www.livemint.com/Politics/zxNzYKQfLHUCB2yR3vKE8J/What-India-GDP-growth-rate-forecast-for-2018-19-means.html|archive-date=16 January 2021|access-date=2021-01-14|website=[[Mint (newspaper)|Live Mint]]|language=en}}</ref> on the economy. In the year 2020, due to the [[COVID-19 lockdown in India|nationwide lockdown]] and shutdown of the industries, the [[Indian economy]] suffered a [[Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India|major economic loss]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|title=Young Indian startups hit as investors get cautious|url=https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/young-indian-startups-hit-as-investors-get-cautious/1787866|date=2020-04-01|access-date=2021-01-15|website=[[Outlook India|Outlook]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=The Indian Economic Journal|volume=68, Issue 2|language=en-US|work=[[SAGE Journals]]|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/iej/current|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121065451/https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/iej/current|date=June 2020|archive-date=2021-01-21|access-date=2021-01-15|url-status=dead}}</ref> It experienced a historic fall of -23% rate of the [[Gross domestic product|GDP]],<ref>{{Cite web|title=Pragati: Journal of Indian Economy|url=https://www.journalpressindia.com/pragati-journal-of-indian-economy|access-date=2021-01-15|website=www.journalpressindia.com|language=en}}</ref> following which, Prime Minister Modi launched a movement called [[Atmanirbhar Bharat]] along with other movements and schemes to support the small scale and indigenous businesses to support the economy and to boycott [[Chinese Communist Party|Chinese products]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Yunus|first=Muhammad|author-link=Muhammad Yunus|date=2020-05-05|title=Muhammad Yunus: Don't plan for economic 'recovery' post-Covid. Redesign it from scratch|url=https://theprint.in/opinion/muhammad-yunus-dont-plan-for-economic-recovery-post-covid-redesign-it-from-scratch/414357/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121180607/https://theprint.in/opinion/muhammad-yunus-dont-plan-for-economic-recovery-post-covid-redesign-it-from-scratch/414357/|archive-date=2020-11-21|access-date=2021-01-15|website=[[ThePrint]]|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Chaudhary|first1=Monika|last2=Sodani|first2=P. R.|last3=Das|first3=Shankar|date=2020-06-01|title=Effect of COVID-19 on Economy in India: Some Reflections for Policy and Programme|journal=[[Journal of Health Management]]|language=en|volume=22|issue=2|pages=169–180|doi=10.1177/0972063420935541|issn=0972-0634|doi-access=free}}</ref> Following this, Prime Minister Modi also announced a scheme of {{INRConvert|20|lc|lk=on|year=2020}} as a relief package for all damages to the economy.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-05-13|title=PM Modi Speech Highlights: To battle Covid-19, Rs 20,00,000 crore economic package|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/coronavirus-india-lockdown-live-news-updates-pm-modi-address-to-nation-speech-today-lockdown-extension-6406297/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210109130908/https://indianexpress.com/article/india/coronavirus-india-lockdown-live-news-updates-pm-modi-address-to-nation-speech-today-lockdown-extension-6406297/|archive-date=2021-01-09|access-date=2021-01-15|website=[[The Indian Express]]|language=en}}</ref>


===Financial inclusion===
===Financial inclusion===
Line 65: Line 66:


[[File:Mudra yojna logo.jpg|thumb|Mudra yojna logo|264x264px]]
[[File:Mudra yojna logo.jpg|thumb|Mudra yojna logo|264x264px]]
Modi government launched the [[Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana]] (PMMY) in April 2015. Under this scheme, loans up to {{INRConvert|1|m}} are given for non-agricultural activities under the three categories: ''Shishu'' (loans up to {{INRConvert|50|k}}); ''Kishore'' (loans from {{INRConvert|50|k}} to {{INRConvert|500|k}}) and ''Tarun'' (loans from {{INRConvert|500|k}} to {{INRConvert|1|m}}). According to a report by the SKOCH Group, this scheme has generated 1.68 crore incremental jobs in the first two years until September 2017.<ref>{{citation |title=Report: PM scheme generates 1.68 crore jobs in 2 years |url=http://m.thehindubusinessline.com/news/education/168-cr-incremental-jobs-created-under-mudra-scheme-in-2-years-since-launch/article9851526.ece |work=[[The Hindu Business Line]] |date=8 September 2017 }}</ref>
Modi government launched the [[Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana]] (PMMY) in April 2015. Under this scheme, loans up to {{INRConvert|1|m}} are given for non-agricultural activities under the three categories: ''Shishu'' (loans up to {{INRConvert|50|k}}); ''Kishore'' (loans from {{INRConvert|50|k}} to {{INRConvert|500|k}}) and ''Tarun'' (loans from {{INRConvert|500|k}} to {{INRConvert|1|m}}). According to a report by the SKOCH Group, this scheme has generated 1.68 crore incremental jobs in the first two years until September 2017.<ref>{{citation |first=K. R. |last=Srivats |title=Report: PM scheme generates 1.68 crore jobs in 2 years |url=http://m.thehindubusinessline.com/news/education/168-cr-incremental-jobs-created-under-mudra-scheme-in-2-years-since-launch/article9851526.ece |work=[[The Hindu Business Line]] |date=8 September 2017 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref>


===Anti-corruption initiatives===
===Anti-corruption initiatives===
In his first cabinet decision, Modi set up a team to investigate black money.<ref>{{citation |title=SIT formed to unearth black money – Narendra Modi Cabinet's first decision |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SIT-formed-to-unearth-black-money-Narendra-Modi-Cabinets-first-decision/articleshow/35636667.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=27 May 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Amit Shah hails Narendra Modi for "surgical strike" against black money, corruption |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/amit-shah-hails-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strike-against-black-money-corruption/articleshow/55318245.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=8 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Demonetisation is just the beginning in fight against black money: PM Modi |url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/demonetisation-is-just-the-beginning-in-fight-against-black-money-pm-modi-116112200402_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=22 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Demonetization is just the beginning of a long battle against black money: Modi |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2016/nov/22/demonetization-is-just-the-beginning-of-a-long-battle-against-black-money-modi-1541529.html |work=[[The New Indian Express]] |date=22 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Tackling black money: Modi govt's two-year report card |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/tackling-black-money-modi-s-two-year-report-card/story-s2vkHzLzMfdr7yEHUHNIfK.html |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |date=10 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Ban on 500, 1,000 notes to help curb corruption: SIT chief on black money |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/ban-on-500-1000-notes-to-help-curb-corruption-sit-chief-on-black-money/articleshow/55327717.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=9 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Demonetisation will push GDP growth to ten percent: Meghwal |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2016/dec/04/demonetisation-will-push-gdp-growth-to-ten-percent-meghwal-1545522.html |work=[[The New Indian Express]] |date=4 December 2016 }}</ref>
In his first cabinet decision, Modi set up a team to investigate black money.<ref>{{citation |title=SIT formed to unearth black money – Narendra Modi Cabinet's first decision |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SIT-formed-to-unearth-black-money-Narendra-Modi-Cabinets-first-decision/articleshow/35636667.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140527233539/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SIT-formed-to-unearth-black-money-Narendra-Modi-Cabinets-first-decision/articleshow/35636667.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |archive-date=27 May 2014 |date=27 May 2014 |access-date=20 October 2021 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Amit Shah hails Narendra Modi for "surgical strike" against black money, corruption |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/amit-shah-hails-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strike-against-black-money-corruption/articleshow/55318245.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=8 November 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Demonetisation is just the beginning in fight against black money: PM Modi |url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/demonetisation-is-just-the-beginning-in-fight-against-black-money-pm-modi-116112200402_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=22 November 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Demonetization is just the beginning of a long battle against black money: Modi |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2016/nov/22/demonetization-is-just-the-beginning-of-a-long-battle-against-black-money-modi-1541529.html |work=[[The New Indian Express]] |date=22 November 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |first=Mahua |last=Venkatesh |title=Tackling black money: Modi govt's two-year report card |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/tackling-black-money-modi-s-two-year-report-card/story-s2vkHzLzMfdr7yEHUHNIfK.html |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |date=10 November 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Ban on 500, 1,000 notes to help curb corruption: SIT chief on black money |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/ban-on-500-1000-notes-to-help-curb-corruption-sit-chief-on-black-money/articleshow/55327717.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=9 November 2016 |last1=Mahapatra |first1=Dhananjay |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Demonetisation will push GDP growth to ten percent: Meghwal |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2016/dec/04/demonetisation-will-push-gdp-growth-to-ten-percent-meghwal-1545522.html |work=[[The New Indian Express]] |date=4 December 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref>
Over the first four years of Modi's premiership, India's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.23%, higher than the rate of 6.39% under the previous government.<ref name="BT Feb 2019">{{cite news |title=Budget 2019: Who gave India a higher GDP – Modi or Manmohan? |url=https://www.businesstoday.in/budget-2019/news/budget-2019-indian-economy-gdp-growth-rate-under-narendra-modi-manmohan-singh/story/315848.html |access-date=6 February 2019 |work=Business Times |date=1 February 2019}}</ref> The level of income inequality increased,<ref name="CNBC Nov 2018">{{cite news |last1=V. |first1=Harini |title=India's economy is booming. Now comes the hard part |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/15/india-economy-modi-faces-inequality-black-money-and-taxes.html |access-date=6 February 2019 |publisher=CNBC |date=14 November 2018}}</ref> while an internal government report said that in 2017, unemployment had increased to its highest level in 45 years. The loss of jobs was attributed to the 2016 demonetisation, and to the effects of the Goods and Services Tax.<ref name="NYT Jan 2019">{{cite news |last1=Gettleman |first1=Jeffrey |last2=Kumar |first2=Hari |title=India's Leader Is Accused of Hiding Unemployment Data Before Vote |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/world/asia/india-unemployment-rate.html |access-date=7 February 2019 |work=The New York Times |date=31 January 2019}}</ref><ref name="Reuters Jan 2019">{{cite news |last1=Kumar |first1=Manoj |last2=Ghoshal |first2=Devjyot |title=Indian jobless rate at multi-decade high, report says, in blow to Modi |url=https://in.reuters.com/article/us-india-economy-jobs/indian-jobless-rate-at-multi-decade-high-report-says-in-blow-to-modi-idINKCN1PP0FX |access-date=7 February 2019 |work=Reuters}}</ref>
Over the first four years of Modi's premiership, India's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.23%, higher than the rate of 6.39% under the previous government.<ref name="BT Feb 2019"></ref> The level of income inequality increased,<ref name="CNBC Nov 2018"></ref> while an internal government report said that in 2017, unemployment had increased to its highest level in 45 years. The loss of jobs was attributed to the 2016 demonetisation, and to the effects of the Goods and Services Tax.<ref name="NYT Jan 2019"></ref><ref name="Reuters Jan 2019"></ref>


====Demonetisation====
====Demonetisation====
{{Main|2016 Indian banknote demonetisation}}
{{Main|2016 Indian banknote demonetisation}}
On 9 November 2016, the government demonetised ₹500 and ₹1000 banknotes, with the stated intention of curbing corruption, black money, the use of counterfeit currency, and terrorism.<ref>{{cite news |title=Rs 500, Rs 1000 currency notes stand abolished from midnight: PM Modi |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/narendra-modi-prime-minister-address-to-the-nation4364609 |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=9 November 2016 }}</ref> The move led to widespread protests throughout the country, including one by opposition parties, which stalled the [[2016 winter session of Indian  Parliament and debate on note ban|winter session of parliament]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/11/28/world/asia/ap-as-india-currency-protest.html?_r=0|title=Thousands Protest Across India Against Currency Policy|work= New York Times|date= 28 November 2016|access-date=4 December 2016}}</ref> In the days following the demonetisation, banks across the country faced severe cash shortages,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-chaos-grows-queues-get-longer-at-banks-atms-on-weekend-4371373/|title=Demonetisation: Chaos grows, queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-chaos-atms-run-dry-161109061403011.html|title=India demonetisation: Chaos as ATMs run dry|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-move-chaos-grows-queues-get-longer-at-banks-atms-on-weekend/article9337803.ece|title=Queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend|date=12 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> which had detrimental effects on a number of small businesses, on agriculture, and on transportation. People seeking to exchange their notes had lengthy waits, and several deaths were linked to the rush to exchange cash.<ref name="Aljazeera-1">{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-takes-toll-poor-161116172745225.html|title=India: Demonetisation takes its toll on the poor|date=16 November 2016|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|access-date=17 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/15/demonetisation-death-toll-rises-to-25-and-its-only-been-6-days/|title=Demonetisation Death Toll Rises To 25 And It's Only Been 6 Days|work=huffingtonpost|access-date=15 November 2016}}</ref> As a combined effect of Modi's announcement and [[2016 United States presidential election|the US presidential election results]], the Indian stock indices [[BSE SENSEX]] and [[NIFTY 50]] declined steeply.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/markets/stock-market-news-november-9-2016/article9322930.ece|title=Sensex crashes 1,689 points on black money crackdown, U.S. election|work=[[The Hindu]]|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref>
On 8 November 2016, the government demonetised ₹500 and ₹1000 banknotes, with the stated intention of curbing corruption, black money, the use of counterfeit currency, and terrorism.<ref>{{cite news |title=Rs 500, Rs 1000 currency notes stand abolished from midnight: PM Modi |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/narendra-modi-prime-minister-address-to-the-nation4364609 |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=9 November 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref> The move led to widespread protests throughout the country, including one by opposition parties, which stalled the [[2016 winter session of Indian  Parliament and debate on note ban|winter session of parliament]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/11/28/world/asia/ap-as-india-currency-protest.html?_r=0|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161201114411/https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/11/28/world/asia/ap-as-india-currency-protest.html?_r=0|title=Thousands Protest Across India Against Currency Policy|work=[[The New York Times]]|date= 28 November 2016|access-date=4 December 2016|archive-date=1 December 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> In the days following the demonetisation, banks across the country faced severe cash shortages,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-chaos-grows-queues-get-longer-at-banks-atms-on-weekend-4371373/|title=Demonetisation: Chaos grows, queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend|date=12 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[The Indian Express]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-chaos-atms-run-dry-161109061403011.html|title=India demonetisation: Chaos as ATMs run dry|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|date=9 November 2016|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-move-chaos-grows-queues-get-longer-at-banks-atms-on-weekend/article9337803.ece|title=Queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend|date=12 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref> which had detrimental effects on a number of small businesses, on agriculture, and on transportation. People seeking to exchange their notes had lengthy waits, and several deaths were linked to the rush to exchange cash.<ref name="Aljazeera-1">{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-takes-toll-poor-161116172745225.html|title=India: Demonetisation takes its toll on the poor|date=16 November 2016|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|access-date=17 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Shivam|last=Vij|url=https://www.huffpost.com/archive/in/entry/demonetisation-death-toll-rises-to-25-and-its-only-been-6-days_a_21605858|title=Demonetisation Death Toll Rises To 25 And It's Only Been 6 Days|work=[[HuffPost]]|date=15 November 2016|access-date=15 November 2016}}</ref> As a combined effect of Modi's announcement and [[2016 United States presidential election|the US presidential election results]], the Indian stock indices [[BSE SENSEX]] and [[NIFTY 50]] declined steeply.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/markets/stock-market-news-november-9-2016/article9322930.ece|title=Sensex crashes 1,689 points on black money crackdown, U.S. election|work=[[The Hindu]]|date=9 November 2016|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref>


The decision met with mixed initial reactions. Several bankers like [[Arundhati Bhattacharya]] (Chairperson of [[State Bank of India]]) and [[Chanda Kochhar]] (MD & CEO of [[ICICI Bank]]) appreciated the move in the sense that it would help curb black money.<ref name="IndiaInc">{{cite web | url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/narendra-modi-rs-500-1000-sbi-arundhati-bhattacharya-icici-chanda-kochhar-here-is-how-india-inc-reacted-4364818/ | title=Govt demonitises Rs 500, 1000 notes: Here is how India Inc reacted | work=[[The Indian Express]] | date=8 November 2016 | access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref> Businessmen [[Anand Mahindra]] ([[Mahindra Group]]), [[Sajjan Jindal]] ([[JSW Group]]), [[Kunal Bahl]] ([[Snapdeal]] and [[FreeCharge]]) also supported the move adding that it would also accelerate e-commerce.<ref name="IndiaInc" /> Infosys founder [[N. R. Narayana Murthy]] praised the move.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/demonetisation-we-should-all-be-celebrating-says-narayana-murthy/articleshow/55357977.cms|title=Demonetisation: We should all be celebrating, says Narayana Murthy |work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/move-to-withdraw-rs-500-1000-notes-master-stroke-narayana-murthy-4365782/|title=Move to withdraw Rs 500, 1,000 notes masterstroke |first=Narayana|last=Murthy|date=9 November 2016}}</ref>
The decision met with mixed initial reactions. Several bankers like [[Arundhati Bhattacharya]] (Chairperson of [[State Bank of India]]) and [[Chanda Kochhar]] (MD & CEO of [[ICICI Bank]]) appreciated the move in the sense that it would help curb black money.<ref name="IndiaInc">{{cite web | url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/narendra-modi-rs-500-1000-sbi-arundhati-bhattacharya-icici-chanda-kochhar-here-is-how-india-inc-reacted-4364818/ | title=Govt demonitises Rs 500, 1000 notes: Here is how India Inc reacted | work=[[The Indian Express]] | date=8 November 2016 | access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref> Businessmen [[Anand Mahindra]] ([[Mahindra Group]]), [[Sajjan Jindal]] ([[JSW Group]]), [[Kunal Bahl]] ([[Snapdeal]] and [[FreeCharge]]) also supported the move adding that it would also accelerate e-commerce.<ref name="IndiaInc" /> Infosys founder [[N. R. Narayana Murthy]] praised the move.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/demonetisation-we-should-all-be-celebrating-says-narayana-murthy/articleshow/55357977.cms|title=Demonetisation: We should all be celebrating, says Narayana Murthy |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=10 November 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/move-to-withdraw-rs-500-1000-notes-master-stroke-narayana-murthy-4365782/|title=Move to withdraw Rs 500, 1,000 notes masterstroke: Narayana Murthy|date=9 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[The Indian Express]]}}</ref>


Former Chief Election Commissioner of India [[S. Y. Quraishi]] said demonetisation could lead to long term electoral reforms.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/demonetisation-could-lead-to-long-pending-electoral-reforms/story-tXYgT7hw6Q3TQUbPuIUucO.html|title=Demonetisation could lead to long-pending electoral reforms|date=11 November 2016}}</ref> Indian social activist [[Anna Hazare]] hailed demonetisation as a revolutionary step.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/anna-hazare-hails-demonetisation-calls-it-revolutionary-step/articleshow/55354898.cms|title=Anna Hazare hails demonetisation, calls it 'revolutionary' step |work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonitisation-a-revolutionary-step-to-fight-corruption-anna-hazare-4367070/|title=Demonetisation a revolutionary step to fight corruption: Anna Hazare|date=10 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/notes-ban-anna-hazare-hails-pm-narendra-modis-revolutionary-step-kejriwal-criticizes-it-1623922|title=Notes Ban: Anna Hazare Hails PM Narendra Modi's 'Revolutionary' Step, Kejriwal Criticizes It}}</ref> The [[President of India]] [[Pranab Mukherjee]] welcomed the demonetisation move by calling it bold step.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/president-pranab-mukherjee-welcomes-demonetisation-of-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes_1947632.html|title=President Pranab Mukherjee welcomes demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes|date=8 November 2016|publisher=india.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-of-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes-bold-step-president-pranab-mukherjee-4364815/|title=Demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes bold step: President Pranab Mukherjee|date=8 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/president-pranab-mukherjee-welcomes-demonetisation-of-rs-1-000-rs-500-notes-1623081|title=President Pranab Mukherjee Welcomes Demonetisation of Rs 1,000, Rs 500 Notes|publisher=ndtv.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-a-bold-step-says-pranab-mukherjee/article9320915.ece|title=A bold step, says Pranab Mukherjee|date=9 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> The opinion of the masses varied both ways on micro-blogs and social media sites like Twitter.<ref name="ToI Twitter reaction">{{cite news|url=http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/everything-social/rs-500-1000-notes-pulled-out-how-twitter-reacted/|title=Rs 500, 1000 notes pulled out: How Twitter reacted|date=8 November 2016|work=Times of India Blogs|access-date=8 November 2016}}</ref>
Former Chief Election Commissioner of India [[S. Y. Quraishi]] said demonetisation could lead to long term electoral reforms.<ref>{{cite web|first=S. Y.|last=Quraishi|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/demonetisation-could-lead-to-long-pending-electoral-reforms/story-tXYgT7hw6Q3TQUbPuIUucO.html|title=Demonetisation could lead to long-pending electoral reforms|date=11 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[Hindustan Times]]}}</ref> Indian social activist [[Anna Hazare]] hailed demonetisation as a revolutionary step.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/anna-hazare-hails-demonetisation-calls-it-revolutionary-step/articleshow/55354898.cms|title=Anna Hazare hails demonetisation, calls it 'revolutionary' step |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=10 November 2016 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Shubhangi|last=Khapre|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonitisation-a-revolutionary-step-to-fight-corruption-anna-hazare-4367070/|title=Demonetisation a revolutionary step to fight corruption: Anna Hazare|work=[[The Indian Express]]|date=10 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/notes-ban-anna-hazare-hails-pm-narendra-modis-revolutionary-step-kejriwal-criticizes-it-1623922|title=Notes Ban: Anna Hazare Hails PM Narendra Modi's 'Revolutionary' Step, Kejriwal Criticizes It|date=November 10, 2016|access-date=October 20, 2021|publisher=[[NDTV]]}}</ref> The [[President of India]] [[Pranab Mukherjee]] welcomed the demonetisation move by calling it bold step.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/president-pranab-mukherjee-welcomes-demonetisation-of-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes_1947632.html|title=President Pranab Mukherjee welcomes demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes|date=8 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|publisher=[[Zee News]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-of-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes-bold-step-president-pranab-mukherjee-4364815/|title=Demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes bold step: President Pranab Mukherjee|date=8 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[The Indian Express]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/president-pranab-mukherjee-welcomes-demonetisation-of-rs-1-000-rs-500-notes-1623081|title=President Pranab Mukherjee Welcomes Demonetisation of Rs 1,000, Rs 500 Notes|date=November 9, 2016|access-date=October 20, 2021|publisher=[[NDTV]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-a-bold-step-says-pranab-mukherjee/article9320915.ece|title=A bold step, says Pranab Mukherjee|date=9 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref> The opinion of the masses varied both ways on micro-blogs and social media sites like Twitter.<ref name="ToI Twitter reaction">{{cite news|url=http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/everything-social/rs-500-1000-notes-pulled-out-how-twitter-reacted/|title=Rs 500, 1000 notes pulled out: How Twitter reacted|date=8 November 2016|work=[[The Times of India]] Blogs|access-date=8 November 2016}}</ref>


By and large, international response was positive which saw the move as a bold crackdown on corruption.<ref name="IMF-response"/><ref name="Chinese state media"/><ref name="Swedish Minister"/> [[International Monetary Fund]] (IMF) issued a statement supporting Modi's efforts to fight corruption by the demonetisation policy.<ref name="IMF-response">{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/imf-supports-pm-modi-s-demonetization-move-in-fight-against-corruption-116111100142_1.html|title=Support by IMF|date=11 November 2016|work=Business Standard}}</ref>
By and large, international response was positive which saw the move as a bold crackdown on corruption.<ref name="IMF-response"/><ref name="Chinese state media"/><ref name="Swedish Minister"/> [[International Monetary Fund]] (IMF) issued a statement supporting Modi's efforts to fight corruption by the demonetisation policy.<ref name="IMF-response">{{cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/imf-supports-pm-modi-s-demonetization-move-in-fight-against-corruption-116111100142_1.html|title=IMF supports PM Modi's 'demonetization' move in fight against corruption|date=11 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[Business Standard]]}}</ref>


Chinese state media ''[[Global Times]]'' praised the move and termed it as "fierce fight against black money and corruption."<ref name="Chinese state media">{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/china-state-media-praises-modi-but-says-he/article9343797.ece|title=State media praises Modi, but says he can learn from China's crusade against corruption|first=Atul|last=Aneja|date=14 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> Former [[Prime Minister of Finland]] and Vice-President of European Commission [[Jyrki Katainen]] welcomed the demonetisation move stressing that bringing transparency will strengthen Indian economy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-to-help-financial-system-eu/articleshow/55399290.cms|title=European Union welcomes India's step on demonetisation |work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.news18.com/news/business/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-will-help-financial-system-european-union-1311545.html|title=India's Crackdown on Black Money Will Help Financial System: European Union|date=13 November 2016}}</ref> [[BBC]]'s South Asia Correspondent [[Justin Rowlatt]] in his article praised the move for its secrecy and success and elaborated on reason behind demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37974423|title=Why India wiped out 86% of its cash overnight|first=Justin|last=Rowlatt|date=14 November 2016|work=bbc.com}}</ref> [[Tim Worstall]] termed the demonetisation as welcome macroeconomic effect in his article in Forbes magazine.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/11/17/indias-rs-500-and-1000-demonetisation-is-lowering-interest-rates-and-also-inflation/#62464fde2edf|title=India's Rs 500 And 1,000 Demonetization Is Lowering Interest Rates And Also Inflation|first=Tim|last=Worstall|access-date=24 November 2016}}</ref> Swedish Minister of Enterprise [[Mikael Damberg]] supported the move by calling it bold decision.<ref name="Swedish Minister">{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/interview-with-mikael-damberg/article9340999.ece?w=alauto|title=Swedish ICT sector wouldn't have been so successful without Indian help|first=Arun|last=S|date=13 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref>
Chinese state media ''[[Global Times]]'' praised the move and termed it as "fierce fight against black money and corruption."<ref name="Chinese state media">{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/china-state-media-praises-modi-but-says-he/article9343797.ece|title=State media praises Modi, but says he can learn from China's crusade against corruption|first=Atul|last=Aneja|date=14 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref> Former [[Prime Minister of Finland]] and Vice-President of European Commission [[Jyrki Katainen]] welcomed the demonetisation move stressing that bringing transparency will strengthen Indian economy.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-to-help-financial-system-eu/articleshow/55399290.cms|title=European Union welcomes India's step on demonetisation |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=November 13, 2016 |access-date=October 20, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.news18.com/news/business/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-will-help-financial-system-european-union-1311545.html|title=India's Crackdown on Black Money Will Help Financial System: European Union|date=13 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|publisher=[[News18]]}}</ref> [[BBC]]'s South Asia Correspondent [[Justin Rowlatt]] in his article praised the move for its secrecy and success and elaborated on reason behind demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37974423|title=Why India wiped out 86% of its cash overnight|first=Justin|last=Rowlatt|date=14 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[BBC News]]}}</ref> [[Tim Worstall]] termed the demonetisation as welcome macroeconomic effect in his article in Forbes magazine.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/11/17/indias-rs-500-and-1000-demonetisation-is-lowering-interest-rates-and-also-inflation/#62464fde2edf|title=India's Rs 500 And 1,000 Demonetization Is Lowering Interest Rates And Also Inflation|first=Tim|last=Worstall|date=November 17, 2016|access-date=24 November 2016|work=[[Forbes]]}}</ref> Swedish Minister of Enterprise [[Mikael Damberg]] supported the move by calling it bold decision.<ref name="Swedish Minister">{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/interview-with-mikael-damberg/article9340999.ece?w=alauto|title=Swedish ICT sector wouldn't have been so successful without Indian help|first=Arun|last=S|date=13 November 2016|access-date=20 October 2021|work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref>


==== Shell companies ====
==== Shell companies ====
{{further|Shell company}}
{{further|Shell company}}


After [[2016 Indian banknote demonetisation|demonetisation of ₹500 and ₹1000 rupee notes]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-37906742|title=India scraps 500 and 1,000 rupee bank notes overnight|date=8 November 2016|access-date=8 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="etBlackMonryCrackdown">{{cite web |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/in-an-attempt-to-curb-black-money-pm-narendra-modi-declares-rs-500-1000-notes-to-be-void-from-midnight/articleshow/55315932.cms |title=In an attempt to curb black money, PM Narendra Modi declares Rs 500, 1000 notes to be invalid |date=9 November 2016 |access-date=9 November 2016 |work=news |publisher=The Economic Times }}</ref><ref name="India Today2">{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/live-pm-narendra-modi-addresses-nation/1/805755.html|title=Here is what PM Modi said about the new Rs 500, Rs 2000 notes and black money|date=8 November 2016|access-date=9 November 2016|work=India Today}}</ref> various authorities noticed a surge in shell companies depositing cash in banks, possibly in an attempt to hide the real owner of the wealth. In response, in July 2017, the authorities ordered nearly 2 lakh shell companies to be shut down while [[Securities and Exchange Board of India]] (SEBI) imposed trading restrictions on 162 listed entities as shell companies.<ref>{{cite news|title=Cracking down on black money, scrutiny of shell firms stepped up|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/cracking-down-on-black-money-scrutiny-of-shell-firms-stepped-up/articleshow/60086235.cms|access-date=16 August 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=In crackdown on shell companies, ED raids 110 locations in 16 states|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-crackdown-on-shell-companies-ed-raids-110-locations-in-16-states/articleshow/57968674.cms|access-date=7 September 2017}}</ref> In September 2017, the government froze bank accounts of nearly 2 lakh shell companies.<ref>{{cite news|title=Black money crackdown: Bank accounts of 2.1 lakh shell companies frozen|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/black-money-bank-accounts-shell-companies-under-radar/1/1041661.html|access-date=7 September 2017}}</ref> A day after, the Corporate Affairs ministry decided to: ban around 300,000 directors of shell companies from serving on the boards of other firms, track down the beneficial owners of suspected shell companies and take penal action against those who divert funds from these shell companies.<ref>{{cite news|title=Govt blacklists 300,000 directors of shell companies|url=http://www.livemint.com/Companies/OiGrM24CxcGUdT94Tk6nAJ/Govt-blacklists-300000-directors-of-shell-companies.html|access-date=7 September 2017}}</ref>
After [[2016 Indian banknote demonetisation|demonetisation of ₹500 and ₹1000 rupee notes]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-37906742|title=India scraps 500 and 1,000 rupee bank notes overnight|date=8 November 2016|access-date=8 November 2016|work=[[BBC News]]}}</ref><ref name="etBlackMonryCrackdown">{{cite news |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/in-an-attempt-to-curb-black-money-pm-narendra-modi-declares-rs-500-1000-notes-to-be-void-from-midnight/articleshow/55315932.cms |title=In an attempt to curb black money, PM Narendra Modi declares Rs 500, 1000 notes to be invalid |date=9 November 2016 |access-date=9 November 2016 |work=[[The Economic Times]]}}</ref><ref name="India Today2">{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/live-pm-narendra-modi-addresses-nation/1/805755.html|title=Here is what PM Modi said about the new Rs 500, Rs 2000 notes and black money|date=8 November 2016|access-date=9 November 2016|work=[[India Today]]}}</ref> various authorities noticed a surge in shell companies depositing cash in banks, possibly in an attempt to hide the real owner of the wealth. In response, in July 2017, the authorities ordered nearly 2 lakh shell companies to be shut down while [[Securities and Exchange Board of India]] (SEBI) imposed trading restrictions on 162 listed entities as shell companies.<ref>{{cite news|title=Cracking down on black money, scrutiny of shell firms stepped up|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/cracking-down-on-black-money-scrutiny-of-shell-firms-stepped-up/articleshow/60086235.cms|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170817000336/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/cracking-down-on-black-money-scrutiny-of-shell-firms-stepped-up/articleshow/60086235.cms|date=16 August 2017|access-date=16 August 2017|archive-date=17 August 2017|work=[[The Times of India]]|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=In crackdown on shell companies, ED raids 110 locations in 16 states|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-crackdown-on-shell-companies-ed-raids-110-locations-in-16-states/articleshow/57968674.cms|date=2 April 2017|access-date=7 September 2017|work=[[The Times of India]]}}</ref> In September 2017, the government froze bank accounts of nearly 2 lakh shell companies.<ref>{{cite news|first=Rahul|last=Shrivastava|title=Black money crackdown: Bank accounts of 2.1 lakh shell companies frozen|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/black-money-bank-accounts-shell-companies-under-radar/1/1041661.html|date=5 September 2017|access-date=7 September 2017|work=[[India Today]]}}</ref> A day after, the Corporate Affairs ministry decided to ban around 300,000 directors of shell companies from serving on the boards of other firms to track down the beneficial owners of suspected shell companies and take penal action against those who divert funds from these shell companies.<ref>{{cite news|first=Gireesh Chandra|last=Prasad|title=Govt blacklists 300,000 directors of shell companies|url=http://www.livemint.com/Companies/OiGrM24CxcGUdT94Tk6nAJ/Govt-blacklists-300000-directors-of-shell-companies.html|date=7 September 2017|access-date=7 September 2017|work=[[Mint (newspaper)|Live Mint]]}}</ref>


===Infrastructure===
===Infrastructure===
Modi government passed the [[National Waterways Act, 2016]] to develop 111 [[National Waterways in India]].<ref>{{citation |title=10 waterways to be made operational next year: Nitin Gadkari |url=http://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/10-waterways-to-be-made-operational-next-year-nitin-gadkari/articleshow/58896336.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=29 May 2017 }}</ref>
Modi government passed the [[National Waterways Act, 2016]] to develop 111 [[National Waterways in India]].<ref>{{citation |title=10 waterways to be made operational next year: Nitin Gadkari |url=http://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/10-waterways-to-be-made-operational-next-year-nitin-gadkari/articleshow/58896336.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=29 May 2017 |access-date=20 October 2021}}</ref>


==Religious and social policies==
==Religious and social policies==
===Hindutva===
===Hindutva===
During the 2014 election campaign, Modi expressed hopes for a tenure without [[communal violence]]. The BJP sought to identify itself with political leaders known to have opposed Hindu nationalism, including [[B. R. Ambedkar]], [[Subhas Chandra Bose]], and [[Ram Manohar Lohia]].<ref name="Manor" /> The campaign also saw the use of rhetoric based on Hindutva, however, by BJP leaders in certain states.<ref name="Palshikar">{{cite journal|last1=Palshikar|first1=Suhas|title=The BJP and Hindu Nationalism: Centrist Politics and Majoritarian Impulses|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=719–735|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089460|s2cid=147143160}}</ref> Communal tensions were played upon especially in Uttar Pradesh and the states of Northeast India.<ref name="Palshikar"/> A proposal for the controversial [[Uniform Civil Code]] was a part of the BJP's election manifesto.<ref name="Ganguly 2014">{{cite journal|last1=Ganguly|first1=Sumit|title=The Risks Ahead|journal=Journal of Democracy|date=October 2014|volume=25|issue=4|pages=56–60|doi=10.1353/jod.2014.0077|s2cid=154421269}}</ref>
During the 2014 election campaign, Modi expressed hopes for a tenure without [[communal violence]]. The BJP sought to identify itself with political leaders known to have opposed Hindu nationalism, including [[B. R. Ambedkar]], [[Subhas Chandra Bose]], and [[Ram Manohar Lohia]].<ref name="Manor" /> The campaign also saw the use of rhetoric based on Hindutva, however, by BJP leaders in certain states.<ref name="Palshikar">{{cite journal|last1=Palshikar|first1=Suhas|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089460?journalCode=csas20|title=The BJP and Hindu Nationalism: Centrist Politics and Majoritarian Impulses|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=719–735|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089460|s2cid=147143160}}</ref> Communal tensions were played upon especially in Uttar Pradesh and the states of Northeast India.<ref name="Palshikar"/> A proposal for the controversial [[Uniform Civil Code]] was a part of the BJP's election manifesto.<ref name="Ganguly 2014">{{cite journal|last1=Ganguly|first1=Sumit|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/556410|title=India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead|journal=[[Journal of Democracy]]|date=October 2014|volume=25|issue=4|pages=56–60|doi=10.1353/jod.2014.0077|s2cid=154421269}}</ref>


Several state governments headed by the BJP have enacted policies aligned with Hindutva after the election of Modi as prime minister. The government of Maharashtra [[Cattle slaughter in India#Legislation|banned the killing of cows]] in 2014.<ref name="Palshikar"/> The government of Haryana made changes to its education policy that introduced Hindu religious elements into the curriculum.<ref name="NEP"/> External affairs minister [[Sushma Swaraj]] suggested after the election that the ''[[Bhagvad Gita]]'' be adopted as India's "national book".<ref name="Palshikar"/> The Modi administration has generally avoided directly supporting policies related to a Hindutva agenda.<ref name="Palshikar"/> There has been an increase in the activities of a number of other Hindu nationalist organisations, sometimes with the support of the government.<ref name="Manor" /><ref name="Palshikar"/> The incidents included a campaign against "[[Love Jihad]]", a [[Ghar Wapsi|religious conversion]] programme, and attempts to celebrate [[Nathuram Godse]], the assassin of [[Mahatma Gandhi]], by members of the right wing [[Hindu Mahasabha]].<ref name="Manor" /> The attempts at religious conversion have been described by the VHP and other organisations involved with them as attempts at "reconversion" from Islam or Christianity. There have been a number of reports of intimidation or coercion of the subjects during these attempts.<ref name="Palshikar"/> Officials in the government, including the Home Minister, have defended the attempts.<ref name="Palshikar"/> There were additional incidents of violence targeted at religious minorities by Hindu nationalists.<ref name="Manor" /> Modi refused to remove a government minister from her position after a popular outcry resulted from her referring to religious minorities as "bastards."<ref name="Manor" /> Commentators have suggested, however, that the violence was perpetrated by radical Hindu nationalists to undercut the authority of Modi.<ref name="Manor" />
Several state governments headed by the BJP have enacted policies aligned with Hindutva after the election of Modi as prime minister. The government of Maharashtra [[Cattle slaughter in India#Legislation|banned the killing of cows]] in 2014.<ref name="Palshikar"/> The government of Haryana made changes to its education policy that introduced Hindu religious elements into the curriculum.<ref name="NEP"/> External affairs minister [[Sushma Swaraj]] suggested after the election that the ''[[Bhagvad Gita]]'' be adopted as India's "national book".<ref name="Palshikar"/> The Modi administration has generally avoided directly supporting policies related to a Hindutva agenda.<ref name="Palshikar"/> There has been an increase in the activities of a number of other Hindu nationalist organisations, sometimes with the support of the government.<ref name="Manor" /><ref name="Palshikar"/> The incidents included a campaign against "[[Love Jihad]]", a [[Ghar Wapsi|religious conversion]] programme, and attempts to celebrate [[Nathuram Godse]], the assassin of [[Mahatma Gandhi]], by members of the right wing [[Hindu Mahasabha]].<ref name="Manor" /> The attempts at religious conversion have been described by the VHP and other organisations involved with them as attempts at "reconversion" from Islam or Christianity. There have been a number of reports of intimidation or coercion of the subjects during these attempts.<ref name="Palshikar"/> Officials in the government, including the Home Minister, have defended the attempts.<ref name="Palshikar"/> There were additional incidents of violence targeted at religious minorities by Hindu nationalists.<ref name="Manor" /> Modi refused to remove a government minister from her position after a popular outcry resulted from her referring to religious minorities as "bastards."<ref name="Manor" /> Commentators have suggested, however, that the violence was perpetrated by radical Hindu nationalists to undercut the authority of Modi.<ref name="Manor" />


The Modi administration appointed [[Yellapragada Sudershan Rao]], who had previously been associated with the RSS, chairperson of the [[Indian Council of Historical Research]].<ref name="Ganguly 2014"/> In reaction to his appointment, other historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the ruling party, questioned his credentials as a historian. Several stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.<ref name="Ganguly 2014"/><ref name="saffronisation">{{cite news |title=Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate |newspaper=[[The Hindu]] |date=16 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece}}</ref><ref name="right_wing">{{cite news |title=Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection |newspaper=[[The Times of India]] |date=18 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms}}</ref>
The Modi administration appointed [[Yellapragada Sudershan Rao]], who had previously been associated with the RSS, chairperson of the [[Indian Council of Historical Research]].<ref name="Ganguly 2014"/> In reaction to his appointment, other historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the ruling party, questioned his credentials as a historian. Several stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.<ref name="Ganguly 2014"/><ref name="saffronisation">{{cite news |first=Anita |last=Joshua |title=Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate |newspaper=[[The Hindu]] |date=16 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece}}</ref><ref name="right_wing">{{cite news |first=Akshaya |last=Mukul |title=Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection |newspaper=[[The Times of India]] |date=18 July 2014 |access-date=20 August 2014 |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms}}</ref>


The government began formulating a New Education Policy, or NEP, soon after its election. As of March 2016, this policy had yet to be implemented.<ref name="NEP">{{cite journal|last1=Sharma|first1=Madhulika|title=Narendra Modi and the new education policy: retrospection, reform and reality|journal=Journal of Asian Public Policy|date=31 March 2016|volume=9|issue=2|pages=140–153|doi=10.1080/17516234.2016.1165330|s2cid=155156332}}</ref> This was the third education policy introduced by the Indian government, following those of 1968 and 1986.<ref name="NEP"/> The policy was described as having overtones of Hindutva.<ref name="NEP"/> The RSS had a role in its creation, and it did not explicitly mention the goals of "socialism, secularism and democracy" that had been mentioned in the first two policies.<ref name="NEP"/> The policy emphasized the education of minority students, as well as those of economically backward groups, in particular on improving enrollment in schools among those groups.<ref name="NEP"/> The policy proposed bringing religious educational institutions under the [[Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act|Right to Education Act]].<ref name="NEP"/> There was also a debate about removing caste-based reservation in favor of reservation based on income, a move supported by the RSS, but which was criticized as being discriminatory on the basis of caste.<ref name="NEP"/>
The government began formulating a New Education Policy, or NEP, soon after its election. As of March 2016, this policy had yet to be implemented.<ref name="NEP">{{cite journal|last1=Sharma|first1=Madhulika|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17516234.2016.1165330?journalCode=rapp20|title=Narendra Modi and the new education policy: retrospection, reform and reality|journal=Journal of Asian Public Policy|date=31 March 2016|volume=9|issue=2|pages=140–153|doi=10.1080/17516234.2016.1165330|s2cid=155156332}}</ref> This was the third education policy introduced by the Indian government, following those of 1968 and 1986.<ref name="NEP"/> The policy was described as having overtones of Hindutva.<ref name="NEP"/> The RSS had a role in its creation, and it did not explicitly mention the goals of "socialism, secularism and democracy" that had been mentioned in the first two policies.<ref name="NEP"/> The policy emphasized the education of minority students, as well as those of economically backward groups, in particular on improving enrollment in schools among those groups.<ref name="NEP"/> The policy proposed bringing religious educational institutions under the [[Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act|Right to Education Act]].<ref name="NEP"/> There was also a debate about removing caste-based reservation in favor of reservation based on income, a move supported by the RSS, but which was criticized as being discriminatory on the basis of caste.<ref name="NEP"/>


On 8 January 2019, India's lower house of parliament approves [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019|a bill]] that would grant residency and citizenship rights to non-Muslim immigrants Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from three Muslim-majority countries - Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan - eligible for Indian citizenship. The Bill excludes Muslims.<ref>[https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/01/india-house-passes-citizenship-bill-excludes-muslims-190108145755215.html India's lower house passes citizenship bill that excludes Muslims | India News | Al Jazeera<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/citizenship-bill-hinduisation-india-190110141421871.html The new citizenship bill and the Hinduisation of India | Human Rights | Al Jazeera<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>  
On 8 January 2019, India's lower house of parliament approves [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019|a bill]] that would grant residency and citizenship rights to non-Muslim immigrants who entered the country before 2014 - including Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from three Muslim-majority countries (Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan) - and make them eligible for Indian citizenship. The Bill excludes Muslims.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/01/india-house-passes-citizenship-bill-excludes-muslims-190108145755215.html|title=India's lower house passes citizenship bill that excludes Muslims|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|date=8 January 2019|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Apoorvanand|author-link=Apoorvanand|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/citizenship-bill-hinduisation-india-190110141421871.html|title=The new citizenship bill and the Hinduisation of India|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|date=12 January 2019|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref>  
[[File:The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi at the Centenary Year Convocation of the Banaras Hindu University (BHU), in Varanasi.jpg|thumb|Modi at the [[Banaras Hindu University]] in Varanasi.]]
[[File:The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi at the Centenary Year Convocation of the Banaras Hindu University (BHU), in Varanasi.jpg|thumb|Modi at the [[Banaras Hindu University]] in Varanasi.]]
On 6 August 2019, the [[Supreme Court of India]] passed resolution on creation of [[Ram Mandir, Ayodhya|Ram Mandir]] on the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed land of Ayodhya]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=India|first=Press Trust of|title=Supreme Court hearing ends in Ayodhya dispute; orders reserved|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/supreme-court-hearing-ends-in-ayodhya-dispute-orders-reserved/article29710840.ece|access-date=2021-04-23|website=@businessline|language=en}}</ref> The [[2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute|verdict]] also stated to provide {{Convert|5|acre|m2}} for creation of a mosque on another part of the land. The land was given to the [[Sunni Waqf Board]].<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Nov 9|first1=TIMESOFINDIA COM / Updated|last2=2019|last3=Ist|first3=14:47|title=Ram Mandir verdict: Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case: Highlights {{!}} India News - Times of India|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-babri-masjid-ram-mandir-case-verdict-highlights-supreme-court-declared-verdict-on-ram-janmabhoomi-case/articleshow/71978918.cms|access-date=2021-04-23|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref> At that time, the government of [[Narendra Modi]] was said responsible for the decision by the court. On 5 August 2019, [[Narendra Modi]] held the Bhoomipujan at the [[Ayodhya]]. He became the first prime minister to visit [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] and [[Hanuman Garhi]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-08-05|title=Modi becomes first PM to visit Ram Janmabhoomi, Hanumangarhi temple in Ayodhya|url=https://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/travel-tourism/modi-becomes-first-pm-to-visit-ram-janmabhoomi-hanumangarhi-temple-in-ayodhya/2046074/|access-date=2021-04-23|website=The Financial Express|language=en-US}}</ref>
On 6 August 2019, the [[Supreme Court of India]] passed resolution on creation of [[Ram Mandir, Ayodhya|Ram Mandir]] on the [[Ayodhya dispute|disputed land of Ayodhya]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Supreme Court hearing ends in Ayodhya dispute; orders reserved|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/supreme-court-hearing-ends-in-ayodhya-dispute-orders-reserved/article29710840.ece|date=2019-10-16|access-date=2021-04-23|work=[[The Hindu Business Line]]|agency=[[Press Trust of India]]|language=en}}</ref> The [[2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute|verdict]] also stated to provide {{Convert|5|acre|m2}} for creation of a mosque on another part of the land. The land was given to the [[Sunni Waqf Board]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ram Mandir verdict: Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case: Highlights|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-babri-masjid-ram-mandir-case-verdict-highlights-supreme-court-declared-verdict-on-ram-janmabhoomi-case/articleshow/71978918.cms|date=2019-11-09|access-date=2021-04-23|website=[[The Times of India]]|language=en}}</ref> At that time, the government of [[Narendra Modi]] was said responsible for the decision by the court [source????]. On 5 August 2019, [[Narendra Modi]] held the Bhoomipujan at the [[Ayodhya]]. He became the first prime minister to visit [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] and [[Hanuman Garhi]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-08-05|title=Modi becomes first PM to visit Ram Janmabhoomi, Hanumangarhi temple in Ayodhya|url=https://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/travel-tourism/modi-becomes-first-pm-to-visit-ram-janmabhoomi-hanumangarhi-temple-in-ayodhya/2046074/|access-date=2021-04-23|website=[[The Financial Express (India)|The Financial Express]]|language=en-US}}</ref>


===Social welfare===
===Social welfare===
In June 2015, Modi launched the "[[Housing for All]] By 2022" project, which intends to eliminate [[slum]]s in India by building about 20 million affordable homes for India's urban poor.<ref>{{citation | url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-26/smelly-dumps-drive-away-affordable-homes-in-land-starved-mumbai | work=Bloomberg | first=Bhuma | last=Shrivastava | title=Mumbai Is Overflowing with Garbage | date=26 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{citation |url=http://www.youthconnect.in/2015/06/19/cabinet-passes-pm-modis-ambitious-housing-for-all-by-2022-scheme-for-the-urban-poor |title=Cabinet Passes PM Modi's Ambitious "Housing For All By 2022" Scheme For The Urban Poor. No More Slums? - Youth Connect |work=Youthconnect.in |date=19 June 2015 }}</ref> A total of 4,718 camps were held from 2014 to 2017, benefiting 6.40 lakh beneficiaries under Assistance to Disabled Persons for Purchase/Fitting of Aids/Appliances (ADIP) scheme, as compared to 37 camps from 2012 to 2014.<ref>{{citation |title=3 years of Modi government: A look at whether big-ticket schemes have brought 'achhe din' for common man |url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/three-years-of-modi-government-a-look-at-whether-big-ticket-schemes-have-brought-achhe-din-for-common-man/articleshow/59150657.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=15 June 2017 }}</ref>
In June 2015, Modi launched the "[[Housing for All]] By 2022" project, which intends to eliminate [[slum]]s in India by building about 20 million affordable homes for India's urban poor.<ref>{{citation | url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-26/smelly-dumps-drive-away-affordable-homes-in-land-starved-mumbai | publisher=[[Bloomberg L.P.]] | first=Bhuma | last=Shrivastava | first2=Anto | last2=Antony | title=Mumbai Is Overflowing with Garbage | date=26 July 2015 | access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |url=http://www.youthconnect.in/2015/06/19/cabinet-passes-pm-modis-ambitious-housing-for-all-by-2022-scheme-for-the-urban-poor |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150621010335/http://www.youthconnect.in/2015/06/19/cabinet-passes-pm-modis-ambitious-housing-for-all-by-2022-scheme-for-the-urban-poor/ |title=Cabinet Passes PM Modi’s Ambitious “Housing For All By 2022″ Scheme For The Urban Poor. No More Slums? |work=Youthconnect.in |date=19 June 2015 |archive-date=21 June 2015 |access-date=21 October 2021 |url-status=dead}}</ref> A total of 4,718 camps were held from 2014 to 2017, benefiting 6.40 lakh beneficiaries under Assistance to Disabled Persons for Purchase/Fitting of Aids/Appliances (ADIP) scheme, as compared to 37 camps from 2012 to 2014.<ref>{{citation |first=Nidhi |last=Sharma |title=3 years of Modi government: A look at whether big-ticket schemes have brought 'achhe din' for common man |url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/three-years-of-modi-government-a-look-at-whether-big-ticket-schemes-have-brought-achhe-din-for-common-man/articleshow/59150657.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=15 June 2017 |access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref>


In 2019, a law was passed to provide 10% reservation to Economically weaker sections.<ref>{{citation |title=Bill on 10% reservation for upper caste poor passes Parliament test: 10 things to know |url=https://m.businesstoday.in/story/bill-on-10pc-reservation-for-upper-caste-poor-passes-parliament-test-10-things-to-know/1/308641.html |work=[[Business Today (India)|Business Today]] |date=10 January 2019 }}</ref>
In 2019, a law was passed to provide 10% reservation to Economically weaker sections.<ref>{{citation |title=Bill on 10% reservation for upper caste poor passes Parliament test: 10 things to know |url=https://m.businesstoday.in/story/bill-on-10pc-reservation-for-upper-caste-poor-passes-parliament-test-10-things-to-know/1/308641.html |work=[[Business Today (India)|Business Today]] |date=10 January 2019 |access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref>


Modi also launched [[Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana]] (PMUY) on 1 May 2016 to distribute 50 million LPG connections to women of BPL families.<ref>{{citation |title=Scheme for LPG to BPL families to be launched in Odisha |url=http://timesofindia.com/city/bhubaneswar/Scheme-for-LPG-to-BPL-families-to-be-launched-in-Odisha/articleshow/52625599.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=7 June 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Raja|first=Aditi|title=Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: 'UPA govt left coffers empty, making it difficult for us' |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/upa-left-empty-coffers-amit-shah-in-dahod-2802047/ |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=16 May 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Modi's pet projects PMUY, Urja Ganga to cross Himalayan borders to Nepal |url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/modi-s-pet-projects-pmuy-urja-ganga-to-cross-himalayan-borders-to-nepal-117032800477_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=28 March 2017 }}</ref> A budgetary allocation of {{INRConvert|800|b}} was made for the scheme. In the first year of its launch, the connections distributed were 22 million against the target of 15 million. As of 23 October 2017, 30 million connections were distributed, 44% of which were given to families belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.<ref>{{citation |title=Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: 3 cr LPG connections already issued, Oil Min seeks to serve another 3 cr beneficiaries |url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/pradhan-mantri-ujjwala-yojana-3-cr-lpg-connections-already-issued-oil-min-seeks-to-serve-another-3-cr-beneficiaries/914691/lite/ |work=[[The Financial Express (India)|Financial Express]] |date=1 November 2017 }}</ref> The number crossed 58 million by December 2018.<ref name="cnbc1218">{{citation |last=Sharma |first=Anshu |title=Government expands eligibility criteria to meet Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana target |url=https://www.cnbctv18.com/energy/government-expands-eligibility-criteria-to-meet-pradhan-mantri-ujjwala-yojana-target-1728431.htm |work=[[CNBC TV18]] |date=19 December 2018 }}</ref> In 2018 Union Budget of India, its scope was widened to include 80 million poor households.<ref>{{citation |title=Budget 2018: Ujjwala scheme to cover 80 million families, says Arun Jaitley |url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/zrbl91l8aL1bIgpyEY4nDN/Budget-2018-Ujjwala-scheme-to-cover-80-million-families-sa.html |work=[[Live Mint]] |date=1 February 2018 }}</ref> 21,000 awareness camps were conducted by oil marketing companies (OMC).<ref name=cnbc1218/> The scheme led to an increase in LPG consumption by 56% in 2019 as compared to 2014.<ref>{{citation |title=Ujjwala scheme boosts India's LPG consumption to a record high in FY19 |url=https://wap.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/ujjwala-scheme-boosts-india-s-lpg-consumption-to-a-record-high-in-fy19-119050300261_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=3 May 2019 }}</ref>
Modi also launched [[Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana]] (PMUY) on 1 May 2016 to distribute 50 million LPG connections to women of BPL families.<ref>{{citation |first=Hemanta |last=Pradhan |title=Scheme for LPG to BPL families to be launched in Odisha |url=http://timesofindia.com/city/bhubaneswar/Scheme-for-LPG-to-BPL-families-to-be-launched-in-Odisha/articleshow/52625599.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=6 June 2016 |access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Raja|first=Aditi|title=Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: 'UPA govt left coffers empty, making it difficult for us' |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/upa-left-empty-coffers-amit-shah-in-dahod-2802047/ |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=16 May 2016 |access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Modi's pet projects PMUY, Urja Ganga to cross Himalayan borders to Nepal |url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/modi-s-pet-projects-pmuy-urja-ganga-to-cross-himalayan-borders-to-nepal-117032800477_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=28 March 2017 |access-date=21 October 2021 |last1=Jacob |first1=Shine }}</ref> A budgetary allocation of {{INRConvert|800|b}} was made for the scheme. In the first year of its launch, the connections distributed were 22 million against the target of 15 million. As of 23 October 2017, 30 million connections were distributed, 44% of which were given to families belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.<ref>{{citation |first=Saurabh |last=Kumar |title=Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: 3 cr LPG connections already issued, Oil Min seeks to serve another 3 cr beneficiaries |url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/pradhan-mantri-ujjwala-yojana-3-cr-lpg-connections-already-issued-oil-min-seeks-to-serve-another-3-cr-beneficiaries/914691/lite/ |work=[[The Financial Express (India)|The Financial Express]] |date=1 November 2017 |access-date=21 October 2021 }}</ref> The number crossed 58 million by December 2018.<ref name="cnbc1218">{{citation |last=Sharma |first=Anshu |title=Government expands eligibility criteria to meet Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana target |url=https://www.cnbctv18.com/energy/government-expands-eligibility-criteria-to-meet-pradhan-mantri-ujjwala-yojana-target-1728431.htm |work=[[CNBC TV18]] |date=19 December 2018 |access-date=21 October 2021 }}</ref> In 2018 Union Budget of India, its scope was widened to include 80 million poor households.<ref>{{citation |first=Kalpana |last=Pathak |title=Budget 2018: Ujjwala scheme to cover 80 million families, says Arun Jaitley |url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/zrbl91l8aL1bIgpyEY4nDN/Budget-2018-Ujjwala-scheme-to-cover-80-million-families-sa.html |work=[[Live Mint]] |date=1 February 2018 |access-date=21 October 2021 }}</ref> 21,000 awareness camps were conducted by oil marketing companies (OMC).<ref name=cnbc1218/> The scheme led to an increase in LPG consumption by 56% in 2019 as compared to 2014.<ref>{{citation |title=Ujjwala scheme boosts India's LPG consumption to a record high in FY19 |url=https://wap.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/ujjwala-scheme-boosts-india-s-lpg-consumption-to-a-record-high-in-fy19-119050300261_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=3 May 2019 |access-date=21 October 2021 }}</ref>


===The Muslim Women Bill, 2017===
===The Muslim Women Bill, 2017===
{{main article|Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019|Triple talaq in India}}
{{main article|Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019|Triple talaq in India}}
The BJP Government formulated the bill after 100 cases of instant [[Triple Talaq|triple talaq]] in the country since the Supreme Court judgement in August 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/66-cases-of-triple-talaq-in-the-country-since-the-sc-judgement-law-minister/articleshow/62279519.cms|title=100 cases of instant triple talaq in the country since the SC judgement}}</ref> On 28 December 2017, Lok Sabha passed The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/lok-sabha-passes-the-triple-talaq-bill/article22319663.ece|title=Lok Sabha passes triple talaq bill}}</ref> The bill make instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddah) in any form — spoken, in writing or by electronic means such as email, SMS and WhatsApp illegal and void, with up to three years in jail for the husband. MPs from RJD, AIMIM, BJD, AIADMK and AIML{{clarify|what do these abbreviations mean?|date=January 2018}} opposed the bill, calling it arbitrary in nature and a faulty proposal, while Congress supported the Bill tabled in Lok Sabha by law minister [[Ravi Shankar Prasad]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/congress-backing-of-triple-talaq-bill-indicates-its-gradually-withdrawing-from-muslim-appeasement-politics-4279223.html|title=Congress' backing of triple talaq bill indicates it's gradually withdrawing from Muslim appeasement politics}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/congress-backs-triple-talaq-bill-khurshid-strikes-discordant-note/articleshow/62283011.cms|title=Congress backs triple talaq bill, Khurshid strikes discordant note}}</ref> 19 amendments were moved in Lok Sabha but all were rejected.
The BJP Government formulated the bill after 100 cases of instant [[Triple Talaq|triple talaq]] in the country since the Supreme Court judgement in August 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/66-cases-of-triple-talaq-in-the-country-since-the-sc-judgement-law-minister/articleshow/62279519.cms|title=100 cases of instant triple talaq in the country since the SC judgement|date=28 December 2017|access-date=21 October 2021|work=[[The Times of India]]}}</ref> On 28 December 2017, Lok Sabha passed The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/lok-sabha-passes-the-triple-talaq-bill/article22319663.ece|title=Lok Sabha passes triple talaq bill|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=28 December 2017|access-date=21 October 2021|last1=Phukan|first1=Sandeep}}</ref> The bill make instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddah) in any form — spoken, in writing or by electronic means such as email, SMS and WhatsApp illegal and void, with up to three years in jail for the husband. MPs from RJD, AIMIM, BJD, AIADMK and AIML{{clarify|what do these abbreviations mean?|date=January 2018}} opposed the bill, calling it arbitrary in nature and a faulty proposal, while Congress supported the Bill tabled in Lok Sabha by law minister [[Ravi Shankar Prasad]].<ref>{{cite web|first=Sandipan|last=Sharma|url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/congress-backing-of-triple-talaq-bill-indicates-its-gradually-withdrawing-from-muslim-appeasement-politics-4279223.html|title=Congress' backing of triple talaq bill indicates it's gradually withdrawing from Muslim appeasement politics|date=28 December 2017|access-date=21 October 2021|work=[[Firstpost]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/congress-backs-triple-talaq-bill-khurshid-strikes-discordant-note/articleshow/62283011.cms|title=Congress backs triple talaq bill, Khurshid strikes discordant note|newspaper=[[The Economic Times]]|date=28 December 2017|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> 19 amendments were moved in Lok Sabha but all were rejected.
   
   
The government introduced a fresh [[The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019]] bill in the lok sabha on 21 June 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/fresh-triple-talaq-bill-introduced-in-lok-sabha-oppositon-members-protest/articleshow/69891244.cms?from=mdr|title=Fresh triple talaq Bill introduced in Lok Sabha|website=Indian Express Website|access-date=31 July 2019}}</ref><ref name="Official-2019-Bill-from-Loksabha-Website">{{Cite web|url=http://164.100.47.4/BillsTexts/LSBillTexts/PassedLoksabha/82_Eng_Muslim_2019.pdf|title=The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019|website=Lok Sabha India Website|access-date=30 July 2019}}</ref> The bill was passed by the [[Lok Sabha]] on 25 July 2019<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/lok-sabha-passes-triple-talaq-bill-over-to-rajya-sabha-now/articleshow/70381627.cms|title=Lok Sabha passes instant triple talaq bill|website=Economic Times|access-date=26 July 2019}}</ref> and then by [[Rajya Sabha]] on 30 July 2019<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/triple-talaq-bill-passed-in-rajya-sabha-1575309-2019-07-30|title= triple talaq bill passed in Rajya Sabha |website=India Today|access-date=30 July 2019}}</ref> and got assent from president Kovind on 31 July 2019.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/president-ram-nath-kovind-gives-assent-to-triple-talaq-Bill/article28780061.ece|title=President Ram Nath Kovind gives assent to triple talaq Bill|website=thehindu.com|access-date=27 February 2020}}</ref>
The central government re-introduced the [[The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019|bill]] in the Lok Sabha on 21 June 2019.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/fresh-triple-talaq-bill-introduced-in-lok-sabha-oppositon-members-protest/articleshow/69891244.cms?from=mdr|title=Fresh triple talaq Bill introduced in Lok Sabha, Oppositon members protest|newspaper=[[The Economic Times]]|date=21 June 2019|access-date=31 July 2019}}</ref><ref name="Official-2019-Bill-from-Loksabha-Website">{{Cite web|url=http://164.100.47.4/BillsTexts/LSBillTexts/PassedLoksabha/82_Eng_Muslim_2019.pdf|title=The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019|website=Lok Sabha India Website|access-date=30 July 2019}}</ref> The bill was subsequently passed by the [[Lok Sabha]] on 25 July 2019<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/lok-sabha-passes-triple-talaq-bill-over-to-rajya-sabha-now/articleshow/70381627.cms|title=Lok Sabha passes instant talaq bill; JDU walks out|website=[[The Economic Times]]|date=26 July 2019|access-date=26 July 2019}}</ref> and then by [[Rajya Sabha]] on 30 July 2019<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/triple-talaq-bill-passed-in-rajya-sabha-1575309-2019-07-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190730134908/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/triple-talaq-bill-passed-in-rajya-sabha-1575309-2019-07-30|title=Triple talaq bill passed in Rajya Sabha|website=[[India Today]]|date=July 30, 2019|archive-date=July 30, 2019|access-date=30 July 2019}}</ref> and received assent from President Kovind on 31 July 2019.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/president-ram-nath-kovind-gives-assent-to-triple-talaq-Bill/article28780061.ece|title=President Ram Nath Kovind gives assent to triple talaq Bill|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=1 August 2019|access-date=27 February 2020}}</ref> After its enactment, the Act became retrospectibly effective from 19 September 2018.


== Health and sanitation policies ==
== Health and sanitation policies ==
{{See also|Swachh Bharat Abhiyan}}
{{See also|Swachh Bharat Abhiyan}}
In his first year as prime minister Modi reduced the amount of money spent by the government on healthcare.<ref name="Economist 2015">{{cite news|title=Sparing Mr Modi's blushes|url=https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21656239-missing-data-should-embarrass-prime-minister-sparing-mr-modis-blushes|access-date=9 November 2016|date=27 June 2015}}</ref> The Modi government launched a "New Health Policy" in January 2015. The policy did not increase the government's spending on healthcare, but placed emphasis on the role of private healthcare organisations.<ref name="Lancet">{{cite journal|last1=Sharma|first1=Dinesh|title=India's BJP Government and health: 1 year on|journal=The Lancet|date=23 May 2015|volume=385|issue=9982|pages=2031–2|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60977-1|pmid=26009217|s2cid=10544022}}</ref> In its budget for the second year after it took office, the Modi government reduced healthcare spending by 15%.<ref name="Lancet"/> This represented a shift away from the policy of the previous Congress government, which had supported programs to support public health goals including reducing child and maternal mortality rates.<ref name="Lancet"/> The [[National Health Mission]], which included public health programs targeted at these indices received nearly 25% less funds in 2015 than in the previous year.<ref name="Lancet"/> 15 national health programs, including those aimed at controlling tobacco use and supporting healthcare for the elderly, were merged with the National Health Mission, and received less funds than in previous years.<ref name="Lancet"/> Modi initially appointed [[Harsh Vardhan (Delhi politician)|Harsh Vardhan]], a doctor and an advocate of tobacco control, minister of health. However, Vardhan was removed in November 2015.<ref name="Lancet"/> The government also proposed introducing stricter packaging laws for tobacco, but this effort was postponed because of the efforts of the tobacco lobby.<ref name="Lancet"/>
In his first year as prime minister Modi reduced the amount of money spent by the government on healthcare.<ref name="Economist 2015">{{cite news|title=Sparing Mr Modi's blushes|url=https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21656239-missing-data-should-embarrass-prime-minister-sparing-mr-modis-blushes|work=[[The Economist]]|access-date=9 November 2016|date=27 June 2015}}</ref> The Modi government launched a "New Health Policy" in January 2015. The policy did not increase the government's spending on healthcare, but placed emphasis on the role of private healthcare organisations.<ref name="Lancet">{{cite journal|last1=Sharma|first1=Dinesh C.|url=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60977-1/fulltext|title=India's BJP Government and health: 1 year on|journal=[[The Lancet]]|date=23 May 2015|volume=385|issue=9982|pages=2031–2|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60977-1|pmid=26009217|s2cid=10544022}}</ref> In its budget for the second year after it took office, the Modi government reduced healthcare spending by 15%.<ref name="Lancet"/> This represented a shift away from the policy of the previous Congress government, which had supported programs to support public health goals including reducing child and maternal mortality rates.<ref name="Lancet"/> The [[National Health Mission]], which included public health programs targeted at these indices received nearly 25% less funds in 2015 than in the previous year.<ref name="Lancet"/> 15 national health programs, including those aimed at controlling tobacco use and supporting healthcare for the elderly, were merged with the National Health Mission, and received less funds than in previous years.<ref name="Lancet"/> Modi initially appointed [[Harsh Vardhan (Delhi politician)|Harsh Vardhan]], a doctor and an advocate of tobacco control, minister of health. However, Vardhan was removed in November 2015.<ref name="Lancet"/> The government also proposed introducing stricter packaging laws for tobacco, but this effort was postponed because of the efforts of the tobacco lobby.<ref name="Lancet"/>


On 2 October 2014, Modi launched the [[Swachh Bharat Abhiyan]] ("Clean India") campaign. The states goals of the campaign included eliminating [[open defecation]], eliminating [[manual scavenging]], and improving waste management practices.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Schmidt|first1=Charles W.|title=Beyond Malnutrition|journal=Environmental Health Perspectives|date=November 2014|volume=122|issue=11|pages=A298-303|doi=10.1289/ehp.122-A298|pmid=25360801|pmc=4216152}}</ref><ref name="Clean India">{{cite journal|last1=Jeffrey|first1=Robin|title=Clean India! Symbols, Policies and Tensions|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=807–819|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1088504|s2cid=147169571}}</ref> The campaign was announced on the anniversary of [[Mahatma Gandhi]]'s birthday, and was planned to achieve these aims in five years, or in time for the 150th anniversary of his birth.<ref name="Clean India"/> As part of the programme, the Indian government began the construction of millions toilets in rural areas, as well as efforts to encourage people to use them.<ref name="Lakshmi">{{cite web|last=Lakshmi |first=Rama |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/india-is-building-millions-of-toilets-but-toilet-training-could-be-a-bigger-task/2015/06/03/09d1aa9e-095a-11e5-a7ad-b430fc1d3f5c_story.html |title=India is building millions of toilets, but that's the easy part |work=The Washington Post |date=14 December 2012 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref><ref name="Gahlot">{{cite news| url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/04/03/globalpost-india-toilet/25236383/ | work=USA Today | first1=Mandakini | last1=Gahlot | title=India steps up efforts to encourage use of toilets | date=3 April 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21607837-fixing-dreadful-sanitation-india-requires-not-just-building-lavatories-also-changing | work=The Economist | title=The_Final_Frontier | date=19 July 2014}}</ref> The government also announced plans to build new sewage treatment plants.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-18/india-plans-1-3-billion-sewage-plants-in-towns-along-the-ganges | work=Bloomberg | first=Archana | last=Chaudhary | title=India Plans .3-Billion Sewage Plants in Towns Along the Ganges | date=18 May 2015}}</ref> The administration plans to construct 60 million toilets by 2019. The construction projects have faced allegations of corruption, and have faced severe difficulty in getting people to use the toilets constructed for them.<ref name="Clean India"/><ref name=Lakshmi/><ref name=Gahlot/> Modi has generally emphasized his government's efforts at sanitation as a means of ensuring good health.<ref name="Lancet"/> He has also advocated [[yoga]] and traditional forms of medicine.<ref name="Lancet"/> An article in the medical journal ''[[The Lancet|Lancet]]'' stated that the country "might have taken a few steps back in public health" under Modi.<ref name="Lancet"/>
On 2 October 2014, Modi launched the [[Swachh Bharat Abhiyan]] ("Clean India") campaign. The states goals of the campaign included eliminating [[open defecation]], eliminating [[manual scavenging]], and improving waste management practices.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Schmidt|first1=Charles W.|title=Beyond Malnutrition: The Role of Sanitation in Stunted Growth|journal=[[Environmental Health Perspectives]]|date=November 2014|volume=122|issue=11|pages=A298-303|doi=10.1289/ehp.122-A298|pmid=25360801|pmc=4216152}}</ref><ref name="Clean India">{{cite journal|last1=Jeffrey|first1=Robin|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00856401.2015.1088504|title=Clean India! Symbols, Policies and Tensions|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=807–819|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1088504|s2cid=147169571}}</ref> The campaign was announced on the anniversary of [[Mahatma Gandhi]]'s birthday, and was planned to achieve these aims in five years, or in time for the 150th anniversary of his birth.<ref name="Clean India"/> As part of the programme, the Indian government began the construction of millions toilets in rural areas, as well as efforts to encourage people to use them.<ref name="Lakshmi">{{cite web|last=Lakshmi |first=Rama |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/india-is-building-millions-of-toilets-but-toilet-training-could-be-a-bigger-task/2015/06/03/09d1aa9e-095a-11e5-a7ad-b430fc1d3f5c_story.html |title=India is building millions of toilets, but that's the easy part |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=4 June 2015 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref><ref name="Gahlot">{{cite news| url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/04/03/globalpost-india-toilet/25236383/ | work=[[USA Today]] | first1=Mandakini | last1=Gahlot | title=India steps up efforts to encourage use of toilets | date=3 April 2015 | access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21607837-fixing-dreadful-sanitation-india-requires-not-just-building-lavatories-also-changing | work=[[The Economist]] | title=The Final Frontier | date=19 July 2014 | access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> The government also announced plans to build new sewage treatment plants.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-18/india-plans-1-3-billion-sewage-plants-in-towns-along-the-ganges | publisher=[[Bloomberg L.P.]] | first=Archana | last=Chaudhary | title=India Plans $1.3-Billion Sewage Plants in Towns Along the Ganges | date=18 May 2015 | access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> The administration plans to construct 60 million toilets by 2019. The construction projects have faced allegations of corruption, and have faced severe difficulty in getting people to use the toilets constructed for them.<ref name="Clean India"/><ref name=Lakshmi/><ref name=Gahlot/> Modi has generally emphasized his government's efforts at sanitation as a means of ensuring good health.<ref name="Lancet"/> He has also advocated [[yoga]] and traditional forms of medicine.<ref name="Lancet"/> An article in the medical journal ''[[The Lancet|Lancet]]'' stated that the country "might have taken a few steps back in public health" under Modi.<ref name="Lancet"/>


Modi's government developed a draft policy to introduce a [[universal health care]] system, known as the National Health Assurance Mission. Under this plan, the government was to provide free drugs, diagnostic treatment, and insurance coverage for serious ailments, although budgetary concerns have delayed its implementation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.medindia.net/news/ambitious-health-care-plan-by-pm-narendra-modi-faces-delays-147823-1.htm |title=Severe Cut-Backs Expected in PM's Ambitious Health Care Plan for India |publisher=Medindia.net |date=31 March 2015 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/03/27/india-health-idINKBN0MM2UT20150327 | work=Reuters | title=Exclusive: Modi govt puts brakes on India's universal health plan | date=27 March 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/narendra-modi-government-healthcare-goals-one-year/1/433670.html |title=Modi government's healthcare schemes have brought smiles on some faces and disappointed a few: One year of Modi |publisher=Indiatoday.intoday.in |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref> The government announced "[[Ayushman Bharat Yojana|Ayushman Bharat]]" (National Health Protection Mission) in the [[2018 Union Budget of India]]. It is World's largest health protection scheme, also being called ''ModiCare''.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Taneja|first1=Richa|title=Modicare, World's Largest National Health Protection Scheme: All You Need To Know|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/modicare-worlds-largest-national-health-protection-scheme-all-you-need-to-know-1807875|publisher=[[NDTV]]|date=2 February 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title='Modicare' to be launched on Aug 15 or Oct 2: Sources|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/national-health-protection-scheme-to-be-implemented-from-oct-2/articleshow/62757339.cms|work=[[The Times of India]]|date=2 February 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Union Budget 2018: Ayushman Bharat to be the world's biggest healthcare scheme, says PM Modi|url=http://www.businesstoday.in/union-budget-2018-19/news/union-budget-2018-19-live-updates-arun-jaitley-speech-parliament/story/269260.html|publisher=[[Business Today (India)|Business Today]]|date=1 February 2018}}</ref> The scheme will help 10 crore families in their medical need.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Pilla|first1=Viswanath|last2=Saraswathy|first2=M|title=National Health Protection Scheme: Modi government has its task cut out|url=http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/policy/budget-2018-national-health-protection-scheme-will-the-costs-match-up-2498531.html|publisher=[[Moneycontrol]]|date=2 February 2018}}</ref> Under the Ayushman Bharat programme, there is a new scheme has been announced by [[Arun Jaitley]], the finance minister of India, called ''National Health Protection Scheme'', providing a health insurance cover of ₹5 lac a family per annum.<ref>{{cite news|title=Budget 2018: Jaitley announces 'world's largest healthcare programme'|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/budget/budget-2018-jaitley-announces-worlds-largest-healthcare-programme/article22618631.ece|work=[[The Hindu]]|date=1 February 2018}}</ref> More than a lakh people have taken benefit of the scheme till October 2018.<ref>{{citation |title=Ayushman Bharat off to flying start; 1 lakh beneficiaries join Modi's insurance scheme in just 1 month |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/economy/ayushman-bharat-off-to-flying-start-1-lakh-subscribers-join-modis-insurance-scheme-in-just-1-month/1356710/ |work=[[The Financial Express (India)|Financial Express]] |date=22 October 2018 }}</ref>
Modi's government developed a draft policy to introduce a [[universal health care]] system, known as the National Health Assurance Mission. Under this plan, the government was to provide free drugs, diagnostic treatment, and insurance coverage for serious ailments, although budgetary concerns have delayed its implementation.<ref>{{cite web|first=Vanessa|last=Jones|url=http://www.medindia.net/news/ambitious-health-care-plan-by-pm-narendra-modi-faces-delays-147823-1.htm |title=Severe Cut-Backs Expected in PM's Ambitious Health Care Plan for India |publisher=[[Medindia]] |date=31 March 2015 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Aditya |last=Kalra | url=http://in.reuters.com/article/india-health-idINKBN0MM2UT20150327 | publisher=[[Reuters]] | title=Exclusive: Modi govt puts brakes on India's universal health plan | date=27 March 2015 | access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Neetu Chandra|last=Sharma|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/narendra-modi-government-healthcare-goals-one-year/1/433670.html |title=Modi government's healthcare schemes have brought smiles on some faces and disappointed a few: One year of Modi |work=[[India Today]] |date=5 May 2015 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref> The government announced "[[Ayushman Bharat Yojana|Ayushman Bharat]]" (National Health Protection Mission) in the [[2018 Union Budget of India]]. It is World's largest health protection scheme, also being called ''ModiCare''.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Taneja|first1=Richa|title=Modicare, World's Largest National Health Protection Scheme: All You Need To Know|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/modicare-worlds-largest-national-health-protection-scheme-all-you-need-to-know-1807875|publisher=[[NDTV]]|date=2 February 2018|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title='Modicare' to be launched on Aug 15 or Oct 2: Sources|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/national-health-protection-scheme-to-be-implemented-from-oct-2/articleshow/62757339.cms|work=[[The Times of India]]|date=2 February 2018|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Union Budget 2018: Ayushman Bharat to be the world's biggest healthcare scheme, says PM Modi|url=http://www.businesstoday.in/union-budget-2018-19/news/union-budget-2018-19-live-updates-arun-jaitley-speech-parliament/story/269260.html|work=[[Business Today (India)|Business Today]]|date=1 February 2018|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> The scheme will help 10 crore families in their medical need.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Pilla|first1=Viswanath|last2=Saraswathy|first2=M|title=National Health Protection Scheme: Modi government has its task cut out|url=http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/policy/budget-2018-national-health-protection-scheme-will-the-costs-match-up-2498531.html|publisher=[[Moneycontrol]]|date=2 February 2018|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> Under the Ayushman Bharat programme, there is a new scheme has been announced by [[Arun Jaitley]], the finance minister of India, called ''National Health Protection Scheme'', providing a health insurance cover of ₹5 lac a family per annum.<ref>{{cite news|title=Budget 2018: Jaitley announces 'world's largest healthcare programme'|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/budget/budget-2018-jaitley-announces-worlds-largest-healthcare-programme/article22618631.ece|work=[[The Hindu]]|date=1 February 2018|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> More than a lakh people have taken benefit of the scheme till October 2018.<ref>{{citation |title=Ayushman Bharat off to flying start; 1 lakh beneficiaries join Modi's insurance scheme in just 1 month |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/economy/ayushman-bharat-off-to-flying-start-1-lakh-subscribers-join-modis-insurance-scheme-in-just-1-month/1356710/ |work=[[The Financial Express (India)|The Financial Express]] |date=22 October 2018 |access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref>


==Education and skill development==
==Education and skill development==


[[Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana]] (PMKVY), a skill development initiative scheme of the [[Government of India]] for recognition and standardisation of skills.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Krishna|first1=Prabodh|title=Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana: Boon Or Bane|url=http://businessworld.in/article/-Pradhan-Mantri-Kaushal-Vikas-Yojana-Boon-Or-Bane/07-07-2017-121649/|publisher=[[Businessworld]]|date=7 July 2017}}</ref> Cabinet approved an outlay of {{INRConvert|120|b}} for the project. The scheme has a target to train 1 [[crore]] Indian youth from 2016 to 2020.<ref name="fe0716">{{citation |title=PM Modi-led Cabinet approves key decisions – from skilling 1 crore youth to NBCC disinvestment |url=http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/pm-modi-led-cabinet-approves-key-decisions-skilling-1-crore-youth-disinvestment/315487 |work=[[The Financial Express (India)|The Financial Express]] |date=13 July 2016 }}</ref> As of 18 July 2016, 17.93 [[lakh]] candidates were trained out of 18 lakh who enrolled for the scheme. The aim of the PMKVY scheme is to encourage aptitude towards employable skills and to increase working efficiency of probable and existing daily wage earners, by giving monetary awards and rewards and by providing quality training to them. Average award amount per person has been kept as {{INRConvert|8|k}}. Those wage earners already possessing a standard level of skill will be given recognition as per scheme and average award amount for them is ₹2000 to ₹2500. In the initial year, a target to distribute {{INRConvert|15|b}} has been laid down for the scheme. Training programmes have been worked out on the basis of National Occupational Standards (NOS) and qualification packs specifically developed in various sectors of skills. For this qualification plans and quality plans have been developed by various Sector Skill Councils (SSC) created with participation of Industries. [[National Skill Development Corporation]] (NSDC) has been made coordinating and driving agency for the same.<ref>{{citation |title=17.93 lakh candidates trained under PMKVY as on July 18 |url=http://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/17-93-lakh-candidates-trained-under-pmkvy-as-on-july-18-116072100579_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=21 July 2016 }}</ref>
[[Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana]] (PMKVY), a skill development initiative scheme of the [[Government of India]] for recognition and standardisation of skills.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Krishna|first1=Prabodh|title=Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana: Boon Or Bane|url=http://businessworld.in/article/-Pradhan-Mantri-Kaushal-Vikas-Yojana-Boon-Or-Bane/07-07-2017-121649/|publisher=[[Businessworld]]|date=7 July 2017|access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> Cabinet approved an outlay of {{INRConvert|120|b}} for the project. The scheme has a target to train 1 [[crore]] Indian youth from 2016 to 2020.<ref name="fe0716">{{citation |title=PM Modi-led Cabinet approves key decisions – from skilling 1 crore youth to NBCC disinvestment |url=http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/pm-modi-led-cabinet-approves-key-decisions-skilling-1-crore-youth-disinvestment/315487 |work=[[The Financial Express (India)|The Financial Express]] |date=13 July 2016 |access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref> As of 18 July 2016, 17.93 [[lakh]] candidates were trained out of 18 lakh who enrolled for the scheme. The aim of the PMKVY scheme is to encourage aptitude towards employable skills and to increase working efficiency of probable and existing daily wage earners, by giving monetary awards and rewards and by providing quality training to them. Average award amount per person has been kept as {{INRConvert|8|k}}. Those wage earners already possessing a standard level of skill will be given recognition as per scheme and average award amount for them is ₹2000 to ₹2500. In the initial year, a target to distribute {{INRConvert|15|b}} has been laid down for the scheme. Training programmes have been worked out on the basis of National Occupational Standards (NOS) and qualification packs specifically developed in various sectors of skills. For this qualification plans and quality plans have been developed by various Sector Skill Councils (SSC) created with participation of Industries. [[National Skill Development Corporation]] (NSDC) has been made coordinating and driving agency for the same.<ref name="bs0716">{{citation |title=17.93 lakh candidates trained under PMKVY as on July 18 |url=http://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/17-93-lakh-candidates-trained-under-pmkvy-as-on-july-18-116072100579_1.html |work=[[Press Trust of India]] via [[Business Standard]] |date=21 July 2016 |access-date=21 October 2021}}</ref>


An outlay of {{INRConvert|120|b}} has been approved by the cabinet for this project.<ref name="fe0716" /> The scheme has a target to train 1 [[crore]] Indian youth from 2016 to 2020.<ref name="fe0716" /> As of 18 July 2016, 17.93 [[lakh]] candidates were trained out of 18 lakh who enrolled for the scheme.<ref name="bs0716">{{citation |title=17.93 lakh candidates trained under PMKVY as on July 18|url=http://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/17-93-lakh-candidates-trained-under-pmkvy-as-on-july-18-116072100579_1.html |work=[[Business Standard]] |date=21 July 2016 }}</ref>
An outlay of {{INRConvert|120|b}} has been approved by the cabinet for this project.<ref name="fe0716" /> The scheme has a target to train 1 [[crore]] Indian youth from 2016 to 2020.<ref name="fe0716" /> As of 18 July 2016, 17.93 [[lakh]] candidates were trained out of 18 lakh who enrolled for the scheme.<ref name="bs0716"></ref>


The government began formulating a New Education Policy, or NEP, soon after its election. This was the third education policy introduced by the Indian government, following those of 1968 and 1986. The policy was described as having overtones of Hindutva.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Puri|first=Natasha|date=2019-08-30|title=A Review of the National Education Policy of the Government of India - The Need for Data and Dynamism in the 21st Century|url=https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3472247|language=en|location=Rochester, NY|ssrn=3472247|website=Social Science Research Network (SSRN)}}</ref> The RSS had a role in its creation, and it did not explicitly mention the goals of "socialism, secularism and democracy" that had been mentioned in the first two policies. The policy emphasised the education of minority students, as well as those of economically backward groups, in particular on improving enrolment in schools among those groups. The policy proposed bringing religious educational institutions under the [[Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act|Right to Education Act]]. There was also a debate about removing caste-based reservation in favour of reservation based on income, a move supported by the RSS, but which was criticised as being discriminatory on the basis of caste.<ref name="NEP" /> As of October 2018, the new policy had not been implemented.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Nanda |first1=Prashant |title=Education in 4 years of Modi government: Implementation remains a key hurdle |url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/zOwRwPTKYp1SKPflDAY2QI/Education-in-4-years-of-Modi-government-Implementation-rema.html |access-date=27 March 2019 |work=LiveMint|date=26 May 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=New national education policy may remain an unfinished agenda of Modi government before 2019 elections |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/new-national-education-policy-may-remain-an-unfinished-agenda-of-modi-government-before-2019-elections/1354902/ |access-date=27 March 2019 |work=Financial Express |date=20 October 2018}}</ref>
The government began formulating a New Education Policy, or NEP, soon after its election. This was the third education policy introduced by the Indian government, following those of 1968 and 1986. The policy was described as having overtones of Hindutva.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Puri|first=Natasha|date=2019-08-30|title=A Review of the National Education Policy of the Government of India - The Need for Data and Dynamism in the 21st Century|url=https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3472247|language=en|location=Rochester, NY|ssrn=3472247|website=[[Social Science Research Network]] (SSRN)}}</ref> The RSS had a role in its creation, and it did not explicitly mention the goals of "socialism, secularism and democracy" that had been mentioned in the first two policies. The policy emphasised the education of minority students, as well as those of economically backward groups, in particular on improving enrolment in schools among those groups. The policy proposed bringing religious educational institutions under the [[Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act|Right to Education Act]]. There was also a debate about removing caste-based reservation in favour of reservation based on income, a move supported by the RSS, but which was criticised as being discriminatory on the basis of caste.<ref name="NEP" /> As of October 2018, the new policy had not been implemented.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Nanda |first1=Prashant K. |title=Education in 4 years of Modi government: Implementation remains a key hurdle |url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/zOwRwPTKYp1SKPflDAY2QI/Education-in-4-years-of-Modi-government-Implementation-rema.html |access-date=27 March 2019 |work=[[Mint (newspaper)|Live Mint]]|date=26 May 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=New national education policy may remain an unfinished agenda of Modi government before 2019 elections |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/new-national-education-policy-may-remain-an-unfinished-agenda-of-modi-government-before-2019-elections/1354902/ |access-date=27 March 2019 |work=[[The Financial Express (India)|The Financial Express]] |date=20 October 2018}}</ref>


In July 2020, the government unveiled the [[National Education Policy 2020]], "envisioning an India-centric education system that contributes directly to transforming our nation sustainably into an equitable and vibrant knowledge society by providing high-quality education to all" <ref>https://www.thehinducentre.com/the-arena/current-issues/article29349517.ece</ref> and making "India a global knowledge superpower".<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-07-29|title=New Education Policy 2020 Highlights: School and higher education to see major changes|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/new-education-policy-2020-live-updates-important-takeaways/story-yYm1QaeNyFW4uTTU3g9bJO.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en}}</ref>
In July 2020, the government unveiled the [[National Education Policy 2020]], "envisioning an India-centric education system that contributes directly to transforming our nation sustainably into an equitable and vibrant knowledge society by providing high-quality education to all" <ref>{{Cite web|first=Akila|last=Radhakrishnan|url=https://www.thehinducentre.com/the-arena/current-issues/article29349517.ece|title=Draft New Education Policy and Schools for the Skilling Age|date=16 September 2019|access-date=21 October 2021|work=[[The Hindu Group|The Hindu]] Centre}}</ref> and making "India a global knowledge superpower".<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-07-29|title=New Education Policy 2020 Highlights: School and higher education to see major changes|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/new-education-policy-2020-live-updates-important-takeaways/story-yYm1QaeNyFW4uTTU3g9bJO.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en}}</ref>


== Foreign policy ==
== Foreign policy ==
{{Further|Foreign policy of the Narendra Modi government|List of prime ministerial trips made by Narendra Modi}}
{{Further|Foreign policy of the Narendra Modi government|List of prime ministerial trips made by Narendra Modi}}
[[File:BRICS leaders meet on the sidelines of 2016 G20 Summit in China.jpg|thumb|Modi with other BRICS leaders in 2016. Left to right: [[Michel Temer|Temer]], Modi, [[Xi Jinping|Xi]], [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]] and [[Jacob Zuma|Zuma]].]]
[[File:BRICS leaders meet on the sidelines of 2016 G20 Summit in China.jpg|thumb|Modi with other BRICS leaders in 2016. Left to right: [[Michel Temer|Temer]], Modi, [[Xi Jinping|Xi]], [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]] and [[Jacob Zuma|Zuma]].]]
Foreign policy played a relatively small role in Modi's election campaign, and did not feature prominently in the BJP's election manifesto.<ref name="Hall 2015">{{cite journal|last1=Hall|first1=Ian|title=Is a 'Modi doctrine' emerging in Indian foreign policy?|journal=Australian Journal of International Affairs|volume=69|issue=3|pages=247–252|date=2015|doi=10.1080/10357718.2014.1000263|s2cid=154260676}}</ref> Modi invited all the other leaders of [[South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation|SAARC]] countries to the ceremony where he was sworn in as prime minister.<ref name="Grare">{{cite journal|last1=Grare|first1=Frederic|title=India–Pakistan Relations: Does Modi Matter?|journal=The Washington Quarterly|date=Winter 2015|volume=37|issue=4|pages=101–114|doi=10.1080/0163660X.2014.1002158|s2cid=153923833}}</ref><ref name="Pant 2014">{{cite journal|last1=Pant|first1=Harsh V.|title=Modi's Unexpected Boost to India-U.S. Relations|journal=The Washington Quarterly|date=Fall 2014|volume=37|issue=3|pages=97–112|doi=10.1080/0163660X.2014.978438|s2cid=154940836}}</ref> He was the first Indian prime minister to do so.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/in-a-first-modi-invites-saarc-leaders-for-his-swearingin/article6033710.ece | title=In a first, Modi invites SAARC leaders for his swearing-in | work=The Hindu | date=22 May 2014 | access-date=24 May 2014 | author=Swami, Praveen | location=Chennai, India}}</ref> Observers have stated that due to Modi portraying himself as a strong and nationalist leader during his election campaign, he would be politically unable to follow a policy of restraint that India had previously followed after terrorist attacks, and is more likely to have a military response.<ref name="Grare"/>{{Sfn|Def|2016|p=9-16}}
Foreign policy played a relatively small role in Modi's election campaign, and did not feature prominently in the BJP's election manifesto.<ref name="Hall 2015">{{cite journal|last1=Hall|first1=Ian|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2014.1000263|title=Is a 'Modi doctrine' emerging in Indian foreign policy?|journal=[[Australian Journal of International Affairs]]|volume=69|issue=3|pages=247–252|date=2015|doi=10.1080/10357718.2014.1000263|s2cid=154260676}}</ref> Modi invited all the other leaders of [[South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation|SAARC]] countries to the ceremony where he was sworn in as prime minister.<ref name="Grare">{{cite journal|last1=Grare|first1=Frederic|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163660X.2014.1002158|title=India–Pakistan Relations: Does Modi Matter?|journal=[[The Washington Quarterly]]|date=Winter 2015|volume=37|issue=4|pages=101–114|doi=10.1080/0163660X.2014.1002158|s2cid=153923833}}</ref><ref name="Pant 2014">{{cite journal|last1=Pant|first1=Harsh V.|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163660X.2014.978438|title=Modi's Unexpected Boost to India-U.S. Relations|journal=[[The Washington Quarterly]]|date=Fall 2014|volume=37|issue=3|pages=97–112|doi=10.1080/0163660X.2014.978438|s2cid=154940836}}</ref> He was the first Indian prime minister to do so.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/in-a-first-modi-invites-saarc-leaders-for-his-swearingin/article6033710.ece | title=In a first, Modi invites SAARC leaders for his swearing-in | work=[[The Hindu]] | date=21 May 2014 | access-date=24 May 2014 | author=Swami, Praveen | location=Chennai, India}}</ref> Observers have stated that due to Modi portraying himself as a strong and nationalist leader during his election campaign, he would be politically unable to follow a policy of restraint that India had previously followed after terrorist attacks, and is more likely to have a military response.<ref name="Grare"/>{{Sfn|Def|2016|p=9-16}}


Modi's foreign policy focused on improving economic ties, improving security, and increased regional relations, which is very similar to the policy of the preceding INC government.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> Modi continued his predecessor [[Manmohan Singh]]'s policy of "multialignment."<ref name="Hall 2016">{{cite journal|last1=Hall|first1=Ian|title=Multialignment and Indian Foreign Policy under Narendra Modi|journal=The Round Table|volume=105|issue=3|pages=271–286|date=2016|doi=10.1080/00358533.2016.1180760|s2cid=156737878}}</ref> This involved the use of regional multilateral institutions and strategic partnerships to further the interests of the Indian government.<ref name="Hall 2016"/> The Modi administration tried to attract foreign investment in the Indian economy from several sources, especially in East Asia.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> The Modi government also upgraded several of India's military alliances, although it was unable to conclude negotiations for a trilateral defense agreement with Japan and Australia.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> As a part of this policy, the Modi government completed India's application to join the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation]], which is led by China and Russia. (SCO). It also joined the [[Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank]] founded by China.<ref name="Hall 2016"/> Together with the US government, it created a "Joint Strategic Vision" for the Indian and Pacific oceans.<ref name="Hall 2016"/> The government also tried to improve relations with Islamic republics in the Middle East, such as Bahrain, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as with Israel, with the intent to also "link west."<ref name="Hall 2016"/> Modi added five bilateral strategic partnerships to the 25 that had been agreed by his predecessors Singh and Vajpayee.<ref name="Hall 2016"/>
Modi's foreign policy focused on improving economic ties, improving security, and increased regional relations, which is very similar to the policy of the preceding INC government.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> Modi continued his predecessor [[Manmohan Singh]]'s policy of "multialignment."<ref name="Hall 2016">{{cite journal|last1=Hall|first1=Ian|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00358533.2016.1180760?journalCode=ctrt20|title=Multialignment and Indian Foreign Policy under Narendra Modi|journal=[[The Round Table (journal)|The Round Table]]|volume=105|issue=3|pages=271–286|date=2016|doi=10.1080/00358533.2016.1180760|s2cid=156737878}}</ref> This involved the use of regional multilateral institutions and strategic partnerships to further the interests of the Indian government.<ref name="Hall 2016"/> The Modi administration tried to attract foreign investment in the Indian economy from several sources, especially in East Asia.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> The Modi government also upgraded several of India's military alliances, although it was unable to conclude negotiations for a trilateral defense agreement with Japan and Australia.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> As a part of this policy, the Modi government completed India's application to join the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation]], which is led by China and Russia. (SCO). It also joined the [[Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank]] founded by China.<ref name="Hall 2016"/> Together with the US government, it created a "Joint Strategic Vision" for the Indian and Pacific oceans.<ref name="Hall 2016"/> The government also tried to improve relations with Islamic republics in the Middle East, such as Bahrain, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as with Israel, with the intent to also "link west."<ref name="Hall 2016"/> Modi added five bilateral strategic partnerships to the 25 that had been agreed by his predecessors Singh and Vajpayee.<ref name="Hall 2016"/>


During the first few months after the election, Modi made trips to a number of different countries to further the goals of his policy, and attended the [[BRICS]], [[ASEAN]], and [[G20]] summits.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> During these visits, Modi attempted to draw further foreign investment in the Indian economy,<ref name="Hall 2015"/> with the use of slogans such as "Make in India" and "Digital India," put forward during a visit to [[Silicon Valley]].<ref name="Hall 2016"/> One of Modi's first visits as prime minister was to Nepal, during which he promised a billion USD in aid.<ref name="Mocko">{{cite journal|last1=Mocko|first1=Anne|last2=Penjore|first2=Dorji|title=Nepal and Bhutan in 2014|journal=Asian Survey|date=2015|volume=55|issue=1|pages=75–81|doi=10.1525/AS.2015.55.1.75|hdl=1885/13357|hdl-access=free}}</ref> Another early visit was to Bhutan.<ref name="Mocko"/> IModi also made several overtures to the United States, including multiple visits to that country.<ref name="Pant 2014"/> While this was described as an unexpected development, due to the US having previously denied Modi a travel visa over his role during the 2002 Gujarat riots, it was also expected to strengthen diplomatic and trade relations between the two countries.<ref name="Pant 2014"/> As of July 2016, Modi had made 51 trips to 42 countries with the intent of strengthening diplomatic relations.<ref>{{citation |title=Will PM Narendra Modi be India's most travelled PM ever? |url=http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/will-pm-narendra-modi-be-indias-most-travelled-pm-ever/articleshow/53389258.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=26 July 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Modi's whirlwind diplomacy and why his 41st foreign trip matters |url=http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/academic-interest/modis-whirlwind-diplomacy-and-why-his-41st-foreign-trip-matters |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=4 June 2016 }}</ref>
During the first few months after the election, Modi made trips to a number of different countries to further the goals of his policy, and attended the [[BRICS]], [[ASEAN]], and [[G20]] summits.<ref name="Hall 2015"/> During these visits, Modi attempted to draw further foreign investment in the Indian economy,<ref name="Hall 2015"/> with the use of slogans such as "Make in India" and "Digital India," put forward during a visit to [[Silicon Valley]].<ref name="Hall 2016"/> One of Modi's first visits as prime minister was to Nepal, during which he promised a billion USD in aid.<ref name="Mocko">{{cite journal|last1=Mocko|first1=Anne|last2=Penjore|first2=Dorji|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276663606_Nepal_and_Bhutan_in_2014|title=Nepal and Bhutan in 2014|journal=[[Asian Survey]]|date=2015|volume=55|issue=1|pages=75–81|doi=10.1525/AS.2015.55.1.75|hdl=1885/13357|hdl-access=free}}</ref> Another early visit was to Bhutan.<ref name="Mocko"/> IModi also made several overtures to the United States, including multiple visits to that country.<ref name="Pant 2014"/> While this was described as an unexpected development, due to the US having previously denied Modi a travel visa over his role during the 2002 Gujarat riots, it was also expected to strengthen diplomatic and trade relations between the two countries.<ref name="Pant 2014"/> As of July 2016, Modi had made 51 trips to 42 countries with the intent of strengthening diplomatic relations.<ref>{{citation |title=Will PM Narendra Modi be India's most travelled PM ever? |url=http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/will-pm-narendra-modi-be-indias-most-travelled-pm-ever/articleshow/53389258.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=26 July 2016 |last1=Chaudhury |first1=Dipanjan Roy |access-date=22 October 2021 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |first=Nalin |last=Mehta |title=Modi's whirlwind diplomacy and why his 41st foreign trip matters |url=http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/academic-interest/modis-whirlwind-diplomacy-and-why-his-41st-foreign-trip-matters |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190522104046/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/academic-interest/modis-whirlwind-diplomacy-and-why-his-41st-foreign-trip-matters/ |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=4 June 2016 |access-date=22 October 2021 |archive-date=22 May 2019 }}</ref>


In 2015, the Indian parliament ratified a land exchange deal with Bangladesh about the [[India–Bangladesh enclaves]], which had been initiated by the government of Manmohan Singh.<ref name="Ronojoy"/> Modi's administration gave renewed attention to India's "Look East Policy", instituted in 1991. The policy was renamed the "Act East Policy", and involved directing Indian foreign policy towards [[East Asia]] and [[Southeast Asia]].<ref name="Hall 2016"/><ref name="Downie">{{cite journal|last1=Downie|first1=Edmund|title=Manipur and India's 'Act East' Policy|journal=The Diplomat|date=25 February 2015}}</ref> The government signed agreements to improve land connectivity with [[Myanmar]], through the state of [[Manipur]]. This represented a break with India's historic engagement with Myanmar, which prioritized border security over trade.<ref name="Downie"/>
In 2015, the Indian parliament ratified a land exchange deal with Bangladesh about the [[India–Bangladesh enclaves]], which had been initiated by the government of Manmohan Singh.<ref name="Ronojoy"/> Modi's administration gave renewed attention to India's "Look East Policy", instituted in 1991. The policy was renamed the "Act East Policy", and involved directing Indian foreign policy towards [[East Asia]] and [[Southeast Asia]].<ref name="Hall 2016"/><ref name="Downie">{{cite journal|last1=Downie|first1=Edmund|url=https://thediplomat.com/2015/02/manipur-and-indias-act-east-policy/|title=Manipur and India's 'Act East' Policy|journal=[[The Diplomat]]|date=25 February 2015|access-date=22 October 2021}}</ref> The government signed agreements to improve land connectivity with [[Myanmar]], through the state of [[Manipur]]. This represented a break with India's historic engagement with Myanmar, which prioritized border security over trade.<ref name="Downie"/>


He coined the concept of "three Ds" — democracy, demography and demand — to reflect the strength of the country.<ref>{{citation |title=How Modi Mobilizes the Indian Diaspora |url=http://www.theglobalist.com/narendra-modi-indian-diaspora-politics-india |work=[[The Globalist]] |date=4 December 2016 }}</ref>
He coined the concept of "three Ds" — democracy, demography and demand — to reflect the strength of the country.<ref>{{citation |first=Sreeram |last=Chaulia |title=How Modi Mobilizes the Indian Diaspora |url=http://www.theglobalist.com/narendra-modi-indian-diaspora-politics-india |work=[[The Globalist]] |date=4 December 2016 |access-date=22 October 2021 }}</ref>


== Defence policy ==
== Defence policy ==
{{wikinews|Indian Prime Minister accuses Pakistan of waging proxy war}}
{{wikinews|Indian Prime Minister accuses Pakistan of waging proxy war}}


During the 2014 election campaign, Modi and the BJP pledged to revisit India's nuclear weapons doctrine, and in particular India's historical policy of no-first-use.<ref name="Joshi 2015">{{cite journal|last1=Joshi|first1=Shashank|title=India's Nuclear Anxieties: The Debate Over Doctrine|journal=Arms Control Today|date=May 2015}}</ref> The pressure to revise the doctrine came from a desire for assertiveness among Indian government and defence officials. Soon after being sworn in as Prime Minister, Modi said that no revision would take place in the immediate future.<ref name="Joshi 2015"/> The election manifesto of the BJP had also promised to deal with illegal immigration into India in the Northeast, as well as to be more firm in its handling of insurgent groups.<ref name="Northeast"/> During the election campaign, Modi said that he would be willing to accommodate Hindu migrants who were being persecuted in Bangladesh, but those that came with "political objectives" would have to be sent back to Bangladesh.<ref name="Northeast"/> The Modi government issued a notification allowing Hindu, Sikh, and Buddhist illegal immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh to legalize their residency in India.<ref name="Northeast"/> The government described the measure as being taken for humanitarian reasons. However, it drew criticism from several Assamese organizations.<ref name="Northeast"/>
During the 2014 election campaign, Modi and the BJP pledged to revisit India's nuclear weapons doctrine, and in particular India's historical policy of no-first-use.<ref name="Joshi 2015">{{cite journal|last1=Joshi|first1=Shashank|url=https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2015-05/features/india%E2%80%99s-nuclear-anxieties-debate-over-doctrine|title=India's Nuclear Anxieties: The Debate Over Doctrine|journal=[[Arms Control Today]]|date=May 2015|access-date=22 October 2021}}</ref> The pressure to revise the doctrine came from a desire for assertiveness among Indian government and defence officials. Soon after being sworn in as Prime Minister, Modi said that no revision would take place in the immediate future.<ref name="Joshi 2015"/> The election manifesto of the BJP had also promised to deal with illegal immigration into India in the Northeast, as well as to be more firm in its handling of insurgent groups.<ref name="Northeast"/> During the election campaign, Modi said that he would be willing to accommodate Hindu migrants who were being persecuted in Bangladesh, but those that came with "political objectives" would have to be sent back to Bangladesh.<ref name="Northeast"/> The Modi government issued a notification allowing Hindu, Sikh, and Buddhist illegal immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh to legalize their residency in India.<ref name="Northeast"/> The government described the measure as being taken for humanitarian reasons. However, it drew criticism from several Assamese organizations.<ref name="Northeast"/>


Modi continued the previous INC administration's policy of increasing military spending every year, announcing an increase of 11% in the military budget in 2015.<ref name="Ladwig">{{cite journal|last1=Ladwig|first1=Walter|title=Indian Military Modernization and Conventional Deterrence in South Asia|journal=Journal of Strategic Studies|volume=38|issue=5|pages=729–772|date=May 2015|doi=10.1080/01402390.2015.1014473|url=https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/indian-military-modernization-and-conventional-deterrence-in-south-asia(50860673-4327-4472-8c74-5e3536d0117b).html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-increases-military-budget-by-11-to-nearly-40-billion-1425124095 | work=The Wall Street Journal | first=Santanu | last=Choudhury | title=India Increases Military Budget By 11% to Nearly $40 Billion | date=28 February 2015}}</ref> This increase was larger than the average growth under the Congress.<ref name="Ladwig"/>
Modi continued the previous INC administration's policy of increasing military spending every year, announcing an increase of 11% in the military budget in 2015.<ref name="Ladwig">{{cite journal|last1=C. Ladwig|first1=Walter III|title=Indian Military Modernization and Conventional Deterrence in South Asia|journal=[[Journal of Strategic Studies]]|volume=38|issue=5|pages=729–772|date=May 2015|doi=10.1080/01402390.2015.1014473|url=https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/indian-military-modernization-and-conventional-deterrence-in-south-asia(50860673-4327-4472-8c74-5e3536d0117b).html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-increases-military-budget-by-11-to-nearly-40-billion-1425124095 | work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | first=Santanu | last=Choudhury | title=India Increases Military Budget By 11% to Nearly $40 Billion | date=28 February 2015 |access-date=22 October 2021}}</ref> This increase was larger than the average growth under the Congress.<ref name="Ladwig"/>


The Modi administration negotiated a peace agreement with the largest faction of the [[National Socialist Council of Nagaland]] (NSCM), which was announced in August 2015. The [[Naga people|Naga]] insurgency in northwest India had begun in the 1950s.<ref name="Northeast">{{cite journal|last1=Singh|first1=Amarjeet|title=Narendra Modi and Northeast India: development, insurgency and illegal migration|journal=Journal of Asian Public Policy|date=2016|volume=9|issue=2|pages=112–127|doi=10.1080/17516234.2016.1165313|s2cid=155231943}}</ref><ref name="Sinha">{{cite web|last1=Sinha|first1=Amitabh|last2=Swami|first2=Praveen|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/simply-put-towards-accord-step-by-step/ |title=Towards the Govt-Naga peace accord: Everything you need to know |publisher=The Indian Express |date=4 August 2015|access-date=30 November 2016}}</ref> The NSCM and the government had agreed to a ceasefire in 1997, but a peace accord had not previously been signed.<ref name=Sinha/> In 2015 the government abrogated a 15-year ceasefire with the Khaplang faction of the NSCM (NSCM-K). The NSCM-K responded with a series of attacks, which killed 18 people.<ref name="Northeast"/> The Modi government carried out a raid across the border with Myanmar as a result, and labelled the NSCM-K a terrorist organization.<ref name="Northeast"/>
The Modi administration negotiated a peace agreement with the largest faction of the [[National Socialist Council of Nagaland]] (NSCM), which was announced in August 2015. The [[Naga people|Naga]] insurgency in northwest India had begun in the 1950s.<ref name="Northeast">{{cite journal|last1=Singh|first1=M. Amarjeet|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17516234.2016.1165313?journalCode=rapp20|title=Narendra Modi and Northeast India: development, insurgency and illegal migration|journal=Journal of Asian Public Policy|date=2016|volume=9|issue=2|pages=112–127|doi=10.1080/17516234.2016.1165313|s2cid=155231943}}</ref><ref name="Sinha">{{cite web|last1=Kashyap |first1=Samudra Gupta|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/simply-put-towards-accord-step-by-step/ |title=Towards the Govt-Naga peace accord: Everything you need to know |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=4 August 2015|access-date=30 November 2016}}</ref> The NSCM and the government had agreed to a ceasefire in 1997, but a peace accord had not previously been signed.<ref name=Sinha/> In 2015 the government abrogated a 15-year ceasefire with the Khaplang faction of the NSCM (NSCM-K). The NSCM-K responded with a series of attacks, which killed 18 people.<ref name="Northeast"/> The Modi government carried out a raid across the border with Myanmar as a result, and labelled the NSCM-K a terrorist organization.<ref name="Northeast"/>


Modi has repeatedly stated that [[Pakistan]] was an [[Pakistan and state-sponsored terrorism|exporter of terrorism]].<ref name="tie0916">{{cite news |title=PM slams Pakistan on terror: 10 quotes from Narendra Modi's speech in Kozhikode |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-narendra-modi-kozhikode-kerala-speech-bjp-pakistan-uri-attack-3048273 |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=24 September 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |url=http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Pakistan-terrorism-PM-Narendra-Modi-G20-Summit-China/articleshow/54016423.cms |title=One nation in South Asia spreading terrorism: PM Modi at G20 Summit |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=5 September 2016 }}</ref> Modi increased the monetary compensation for victims of terrorist attacks, and stated that citizens of [[Azad Kashmir]] could also apply for this compensation.<ref>{{citation |url=http://m.indiatoday.in/story/modi-pakistan-pok-enhanced-compensation-terror-victims/1/748273.html |title=Modi stumps Pak, announces enhanced compensation for terror victims, PoK residents can apply too |work=[[India Today]] |date=24 August 2016 }}</ref> In September 2016, he urged the [[BRICS]] to target and destroy funding channels of terrorist groups.<ref>{{citation |title=BRICS Must Intensify Efforts Against Terror, Its Sponsors: PM Modi |url=http://m.ndtv.com/india-news/brics-must-intensify-efforts-against-terror-its-sponsors-pm-narendra-modi-1454357 |work=[[NDTV]] |date=4 September 2016 }}</ref> On 29 September 2016, the Indian Army stated that it had conducted a [[surgical strike]] on terror launchpads in PoK,<ref>{{citation |title=Surgical Strikes Have Upended Pakistan Doctrine: LoC, Stock and Barrel |url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/pakistan-doctrine-upended-loc-stock-and-barrel-1300426.html |work=[[News18]] |date=10 October 2016 }}</ref> Pakistan denied the claim which they always do. The details of the confrontation were later released by the Indian Army. Video footages were released of the confrontations.<ref>{{citation |first1=Ellen |last1=Barry |first2=Salman |last2=Masood |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/30/world/asia/kashmir-india-pakistan.html?_r=0 |title=India Claims 'Surgical Strikes' in Pakistani-Controlled Kashmir |newspaper=The New York Times |date=29 September 2016 |access-date=1 October 2016}}</ref><ref name="BBC2">{{cite web|title=Kashmir attack: India 'launches strikes against militants'|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37504308|website=BBC News|access-date=30 September 2016|date=29 September 2016}}</ref>
Modi has repeatedly stated that [[Pakistan]] was an [[Pakistan and state-sponsored terrorism|exporter of terrorism]].<ref name="tie0916">{{cite news |title=PM slams Pakistan on terror: 10 quotes from Narendra Modi's speech in Kozhikode |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-narendra-modi-kozhikode-kerala-speech-bjp-pakistan-uri-attack-3048273 |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=24 September 2016 |access-date=22 October 2021 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |first=Shyam |last=Balasubramanian |url=http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Pakistan-terrorism-PM-Narendra-Modi-G20-Summit-China/articleshow/54016423.cms |title=One nation in South Asia spreading terrorism: PM Modi at G20 Summit |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=5 September 2016 |access-date=22 October 2021 }}</ref> Modi increased the monetary compensation for victims of terrorist attacks, and stated that citizens of [[Azad Kashmir]] could also apply for this compensation.<ref>{{citation |first=Kamaljit Kaur |last=Sandhu |url=http://m.indiatoday.in/story/modi-pakistan-pok-enhanced-compensation-terror-victims/1/748273.html |title=Modi stumps Pak, announces enhanced compensation for terror victims, PoK residents can apply too |work=[[India Today]] |date=24 August 2016 |access-date=22 October 2021 }}</ref> In September 2016, he urged the [[BRICS]] to target and destroy funding channels of terrorist groups.<ref>{{citation |title=BRICS Must Intensify Efforts Against Terror, Its Sponsors: PM Modi |url=http://m.ndtv.com/india-news/brics-must-intensify-efforts-against-terror-its-sponsors-pm-narendra-modi-1454357 |publisher=[[NDTV]] |date=4 September 2016 |access-date=22 October 2021 }}</ref> On 29 September 2016, the Indian Army stated that it had conducted a [[surgical strike]] on terror launchpads in PoK,<ref>{{citation |first=Bhupendra |last=Chaubey |title=Surgical Strikes Have Upended Pak Doctrine: LoC, Stock and Barrel |url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/pakistan-doctrine-upended-loc-stock-and-barrel-1300426.html |work=[[News18]] |date=10 October 2016 |access-date=22 October 2021 }}</ref> Pakistan denied the claim which they always do. The details of the confrontation were later released by the Indian Army. Video footages were released of the confrontations.<ref>{{citation |first1=Ellen |last1=Barry |first2=Salman |last2=Masood |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/30/world/asia/kashmir-india-pakistan.html?_r=0 |title=India Claims ‘Surgical Strikes’ Across Line of Control in Kashmir |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=29 September 2016 |access-date=1 October 2016}}</ref><ref name="BBC2">{{cite web|title=Kashmir attack: India 'launches strikes against militants'|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37504308|website=[[BBC News]]|access-date=30 September 2016|date=29 September 2016}}</ref>


Modi also played a crucial role and known for involving in [[2017 China–India border standoff]] at the [[Doklam]] making the Defence policy strict against [[China]] and also strengthening relations with [[Bhutan]].<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Myers|first1=Steven Lee|last2=Barry|first2=Ellen|last3=Fisher|first3=Max|date=2017-07-26|title=How India and China Have Come to the Brink Over a Remote Mountain Pass (Published 2017)|language=en-US|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.html|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170827150313/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.html|archive-date=2017-08-27|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=August 29, 2017|title=Doklam Standoff: Bhutan welcomes end of Doklam standoff |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bhutan-welcomes-end-of-dokalam-standoff/articleshow/60274631.cms|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829202116/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bhutan-welcomes-end-of-dokalam-standoff/articleshow/60274631.cms|archive-date=2017-08-29|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[The Times of India]]|language=en}}</ref>
Modi also played a crucial role and known for involving in [[2017 China–India border standoff]] at the [[Doklam]] making the Defence policy strict against [[China]] and also strengthening relations with [[Bhutan]].<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Myers|first1=Steven Lee|last2=Barry|first2=Ellen|last3=Fisher|first3=Max|date=2017-07-26|title=How India and China Have Come to the Brink Over a Remote Mountain Pass |language=en-US|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.html|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170827150313/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.html|archive-date=2017-08-27|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=August 29, 2017|title=Bhutan welcomes end of Doklam standoff |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bhutan-welcomes-end-of-dokalam-standoff/articleshow/60274631.cms|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829202116/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bhutan-welcomes-end-of-dokalam-standoff/articleshow/60274631.cms|archive-date=2017-08-29|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[The Times of India]]|language=en}}</ref>


The Modi administration has been active in the [[Common Security and Defence Policy|Defence policy]],<ref>{{Cite web|last=Ministry of Defence|author-link=Ministry of Defence (India)|date=16 July 2016|title=Accomplishments|url=https://mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/accomplishments.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190810011806/https://mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/accomplishments.pdf|archive-date=2019-08-10|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Narendra Modi Government|modigov.in]]|ref={{SfnRef|Def|2016}}}}</ref> he has a major concern and soon on 14 February 2019, a convoy of vehicles carrying security personnel on the [[Jammu Srinagar National Highway]] was attacked by a vehicle-borne [[suicide bomber]] at [[Lethpora]] in the [[Pulwama district]], [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]], India.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Rajagopalan|first=Rajeswari Pillai|title=New Terror Attack Exposes India's Limited Options|url=https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/new-terror-attack-exposes-indias-limited-options/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190216125212/https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/new-terror-attack-exposes-indias-limited-options/|archive-date=2019-02-16|access-date=2021-01-10|website=thediplomat.com|language=en-US}}</ref> The attack resulted in the deaths of 46 [[Central Reserve Police Force]] personnel and the attacker. The perpetrator of the attack was from Indian-administered Kashmir.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Abi-Habib|first1=Maria|last2=Yasir|first2=Sameer|last3=Kumar|first3=Hari|date=2019-02-15|title=India Blames Pakistan for Attack in Kashmir, Promising a Response (Published 2019)|language=en-US|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/world/asia/kashmir-attack-pulwama.html|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190223135448/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/world/asia/kashmir-attack-pulwama.html|archive-date=2019-02-23|issn=0362-4331|quote=The militant who claimed responsibility for the attack, Aadil Ahmad Dar, was from a village about six miles from where the Indian convoy was struck, in contrast to the fighters and weapons that once streamed in from Pakistani-occupied areas to sustain the insurgency. And the explosives he packed into his car appear to have been locally procured, security experts said.}}</ref> The responsibility for the attack was claimed by the [[Pakistan and terrorism|Pakistan]]-based [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist]] militant group [[Jaish-e-Mohammed]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=February 18, 2019|first=Raj|last=Shekhar|title=Abdul Rasheed Ghazi: Pulwama attack mastermind Abdul Rasheed Ghazi killed by security forces in Kashmir |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pulwama-attack-mastermind-abdul-rasheed-ghazi-killed-by-security-forces-in-kashmir/articleshow/68044481.cms|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190218075855/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pulwama-attack-mastermind-abdul-rasheed-ghazi-killed-by-security-forces-in-kashmir/articleshow/68044481.cms|archive-date=2019-02-18|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[The Times of India]]|language=en}}</ref> On 26 February, twelve [[Mirage 2000]] jets of the [[Indian Air Force]] crossed the [[Line of Control]] and dropped bombs into Balakot, Pakistan. India claimed that it attacked a Jaish-e-Mohammed training camp and killed a large number of terrorists, reported to be between 300 and 350. Pakistan claimed that they quickly scrambled jets to intercept the IAF jets, who dropped their payloads to quickly return over the Line of Control.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Sunil|first=Prabhu|title=India Strikes After Pulwama Terror Attack, Hits Biggest Jaish-e-Mohammed Camp In Balakot|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-struck-biggest-training-camp-of-jaish-in-balakot-large-number-of-terrorists-eliminated-governm-1999390|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227053325/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-struck-biggest-training-camp-of-jaish-in-balakot-large-number-of-terrorists-eliminated-governm-1999390|archive-date=2019-02-27|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[NDTV|NDTV.com]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Indian Air Strike Destroys Terror Camp In Pakistan, Upto 350 Terrorists Killed|url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/politics/pre-dawn-indian-air-strike-destroys-jem-camp-in-pakistan-sources-say-up-to-350-terrorists-killed-3|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227181954/https://www.bloombergquint.com/politics/pre-dawn-indian-air-strike-destroys-jem-camp-in-pakistan-sources-say-up-to-350-terrorists-killed-3|archive-date=2019-02-27|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[The Quint|BloombergQuint]]|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2019-02-26|title=Viewpoint: Balakot air strikes raise stakes in India-Pakistan stand-off|language=en-GB|work=[[BBC News]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227061938/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|archive-date=2019-02-27}}</ref>
The Modi administration has been active in the [[Common Security and Defence Policy|Defence policy]],<ref>{{Cite web|last=Ministry of Defence|author-link=Ministry of Defence (India)|date=July 2016|title=Key Accomplishments|url=https://mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/accomplishments.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190810011806/https://mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/accomplishments.pdf|archive-date=2019-08-10|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Narendra Modi Government|modigov.in]]|ref={{SfnRef|Def|2016}}}}</ref> he has a major concern and soon on 14 February 2019, a convoy of vehicles carrying security personnel on the [[Jammu Srinagar National Highway]] was attacked by a vehicle-borne [[suicide bomber]] at [[Lethpora]] in the [[Pulwama district]], [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]], India.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Rajagopalan|first=Rajeswari Pillai|title=New Terror Attack Exposes India's Limited Options|url=https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/new-terror-attack-exposes-indias-limited-options/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190216125212/https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/new-terror-attack-exposes-indias-limited-options/|date=2019-02-15|archive-date=2019-02-16|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[The Diplomat]]|language=en-US}}</ref> The attack resulted in the deaths of 46 [[Central Reserve Police Force]] personnel and the attacker. The perpetrator of the attack was from Indian-administered Kashmir.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Abi-Habib|first1=Maria|last2=Yasir|first2=Sameer|last3=Kumar|first3=Hari|date=2019-02-15|title=India Blames Pakistan for Attack in Kashmir, Promising a Response|language=en-US|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/world/asia/kashmir-attack-pulwama.html|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190223135448/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/world/asia/kashmir-attack-pulwama.html|archive-date=2019-02-23|issn=0362-4331|quote=The terrorist who claimed responsibility for the attack, Aadil Ahmad Dar, was from a village about six miles from where the Indian convoy was struck, in contrast to the fighters and weapons that once streamed in from Pakistani-occupied areas to sustain the insurgency. And the explosives he packed into his car appear to have been locally procured, security experts said.}}</ref> The responsibility for the attack was claimed by the [[Pakistan and terrorism|Pakistan]]-based [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist]]terrorist group [[Jaish-e-Mohammed]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=February 18, 2019|first=Raj|last=Shekhar|title=Pulwama attack mastermind Abdul Rasheed Ghazi killed by security forces in Kashmir |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pulwama-attack-mastermind-abdul-rasheed-ghazi-killed-by-security-forces-in-kashmir/articleshow/68044481.cms|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190218075855/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pulwama-attack-mastermind-abdul-rasheed-ghazi-killed-by-security-forces-in-kashmir/articleshow/68044481.cms|archive-date=2019-02-18|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[The Times of India]]|language=en}}</ref> On 26 February, twelve [[Mirage 2000]] jets of the [[Indian Air Force]] crossed the [[Line of Control]] and dropped bombs into Balakot, Pakistan. India claimed that it attacked a Jaish-e-Mohammed training camp and killed a large number of terrorists, reported to be between 300 and 350. Pakistan claimed that they quickly scrambled jets to intercept the IAF jets, who dropped their payloads to quickly return over the Line of Control.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Prabhu|first=Sunil|title=India Strikes After Pulwama Terror Attack, Hits Biggest Jaish-e-Mohammed Camp In Balakot|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-struck-biggest-training-camp-of-jaish-in-balakot-large-number-of-terrorists-eliminated-governm-1999390|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227053325/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-struck-biggest-training-camp-of-jaish-in-balakot-large-number-of-terrorists-eliminated-governm-1999390|date=2019-02-26|archive-date=2019-02-27|access-date=2021-01-10|publisher=[[NDTV]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Indian Air Strike Destroys Terror Camp In Pakistan, Upto 350 Terrorists Killed|url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/politics/pre-dawn-indian-air-strike-destroys-jem-camp-in-pakistan-sources-say-up-to-350-terrorists-killed-3|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227181954/https://www.bloombergquint.com/politics/pre-dawn-indian-air-strike-destroys-jem-camp-in-pakistan-sources-say-up-to-350-terrorists-killed-3|date=2019-02-26|archive-date=2019-02-27|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[The Quint|BloombergQuint]]|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2019-02-26|title=Viewpoint: Balakot air strikes raise stakes in India-Pakistan stand-off|language=en-GB|work=[[BBC News]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227061938/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|archive-date=2019-02-27}}</ref>


After the [[17th Lok Sabha|2019 Lok Sabha election]] win, he made serious and strict defence policy against [[China]] and [[Pakistan]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-05-01|title=PM Modi pushes for reduction in imports in defence sector|url=https://www.livemint.com/news/india/pm-modi-pushes-for-reduction-in-imports-in-defence-sector-11588270946658.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Mint (newspaper)|mint]]|language=en}}</ref>
After the [[17th Lok Sabha|2019 Lok Sabha election]] win, he made serious and strict defence policy against [[China]] and [[Pakistan]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-05-01|title=PM Modi pushes for reduction in imports in defence sector|url=https://www.livemint.com/news/india/pm-modi-pushes-for-reduction-in-imports-in-defence-sector-11588270946658.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Mint (newspaper)|Live Mint]]|language=en}}</ref>


Following [[2020 China–India skirmishes|Galwan valley skirmishes]], there were made serious policies against [[China]].<ref>Subramaniam, Air Vice Marshal (Retd.) Arjun (8 October 2020). "20". ''Full Spectrum: India's Wars, 1972-2020''. [[India]]: [[HarperCollins|Harper Collins]]. pp. 451–471. {{ISBN|9789353578060|}}</ref> On 17 June 2020, Modi addressed the nation regarding the Galwan skirmish, giving a firm message directed at China over the deaths of Indian soldiers.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-06-18|title=India warns China of serious impact on ties, Modi talks of 'befitting' reply|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/india-warns-china-of-serious-impact-on-ties-modi-talks-of-befitting-reply/story-pWgAXVlQT7yeQnepFpzj3O.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en}}</ref> The first communication since the start of the border dispute between the foreign ministers of China, [[Wang Yi (politician)|Wang Yi]] and of India, [[S Jaishankar]] also happened after the Galwan skirmish. S Jaishankar accused the Chinese actions in Galwan to be "pre-meditated and planned".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Sudarshan|first=V.|date=2020-06-01|title=A phantom called the Line of Actual Control|language=en-IN|work=[[The Hindu]]|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/a-phantom-called-the-line-of-actual-control/article31717488.ece|access-date=2021-01-10|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
Following [[2020 China–India skirmishes|Galwan valley skirmishes]], there were made serious policies against [[China]].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Subramaniam|first= Arjun|url=https://books.google.com/books/about/Full_Spectrum.html?id=i-f1DwAAQBAJ|title=Full Spectrum: India's Wars, 1972-2020|publisher=[[India]]: [[HarperCollins|Harper Collins]]|date=2020|isbn=9789353578060|location=|pages=451-471|language=en}}</ref> On 17 June 2020, Modi addressed the nation regarding the Galwan skirmish, giving a firm message directed at China over the deaths of Indian soldiers.<ref>{{Cite web|first1=Rezaul H.|last1=Laskar|first2=Rahul|last2=Singh|first3=Sutirtho|last3=Patranobis|date=2020-06-18|title=India warns China of serious impact on ties, Modi talks of 'befitting' reply|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/india-warns-china-of-serious-impact-on-ties-modi-talks-of-befitting-reply/story-pWgAXVlQT7yeQnepFpzj3O.html|access-date=2021-01-10|website=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en}}</ref> The first communication since the start of the border dispute between the foreign ministers of China, [[Wang Yi (politician)|Wang Yi]] and of India, [[S Jaishankar]] also happened after the Galwan skirmish. S Jaishankar accused the Chinese actions in Galwan to be "pre-meditated and planned".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Sudarshan|first=V.|date=2020-06-01|title=A phantom called the Line of Actual Control|language=en-IN|work=[[The Hindu]]|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/a-phantom-called-the-line-of-actual-control/article31717488.ece|access-date=2021-01-10|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>


==Environmental policies==
==Environmental policies==
[[File:Prime Minister Narendra Modi at India Pavilion in Paris during COP21 (23193999974).jpg|thumb|Modi(right) at [[CoP21 Climate Conference]], in Paris, announcing the founding of an International [[Solar Alliance]] (ISA). November 2015.]]
[[File:Prime Minister Narendra Modi at India Pavilion in Paris during COP21 (23193999974).jpg|thumb|Modi(right) at [[CoP21 Climate Conference]], in Paris, announcing the founding of an International [[Solar Alliance]] (ISA). November 2015.]]
In naming his cabinet, Modi renamed the "Ministry of Environment and Forests" the "Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change."<ref name="Kothari">{{cite journal|last1=Kothari|first1=Ashish|title=A Hundred Days Closer to Ecological and Social Suicide|journal=Economic & Political Weekly|date=27 September 2014|volume=49|issue=39}}</ref> In the first budget of the government, the money allotted to this ministry was reduced by more than 50%.<ref name="Kothari"/> The new ministry also removed or diluted a number of laws related to environmental protection. These included no longer requiring clearance from the [[National Board for Wildlife]] for projects close to protected areas, and allowing certain projects to proceed before environmental clearance was received.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref name="Kothari"/> The government also tried to reconstitute the Wildlife board such that it no longer had representatives from non-governmental organisations: however, this move was prevented by the Supreme court.<ref name="Kothari"/>
In naming his cabinet, Modi renamed the "Ministry of Environment and Forests" the "Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change."<ref name="Kothari">{{cite journal|last1=Kothari|first1=Ashish|url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2014/39/commentary/hundred-days-closer-ecological-and-social-suicide.html|title=A Hundred Days Closer to Ecological and Social Suicide|journal=[[Economic & Political Weekly]]|date=27 September 2014|access-date=23 October 2021|volume=49|issue=39}}</ref> In the first budget of the government, the money allotted to this ministry was reduced by more than 50%.<ref name="Kothari"/> The new ministry also removed or diluted a number of laws related to environmental protection. These included no longer requiring clearance from the [[National Board for Wildlife]] for projects close to protected areas, and allowing certain projects to proceed before environmental clearance was received.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref name="Kothari"/> The government also tried to reconstitute the Wildlife board such that it no longer had representatives from non-governmental organisations: however, this move was prevented by the Supreme court.<ref name="Kothari"/>


Modi also relaxed or abolished a number of other environmental regulations, particularly those related to industrial activity. A government committee stated that the existing system only served to create corruption, and that the government should instead rely on the owners of industries to voluntarily inform the government about the pollution they were creating.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref name="Barry">{{cite news|last1=Barry|first1=Ellen|last2=Bagri|first2=Neha Thirani|title=Narendra Modi, Favoring Growth in India, Pares Back Environmental Rules|work=The New York Times|date=4 December 2014}}</ref> The changes were made with the aim of accelerating approval for industrial projects. Other changes included reducing ministry oversight on small mining projects, and no longer requiring approval from tribal councils for projects inside forested areas.<ref name="Barry"/> In addition, Modi lifted a moratorium on new industrial activity in the most polluted areas in the countries.<ref name="Kothari"/> The changes were welcomed by business people, but were criticized by environmentalists.<ref name="Barry"/>
Modi also relaxed or abolished a number of other environmental regulations, particularly those related to industrial activity. A government committee stated that the existing system only served to create corruption, and that the government should instead rely on the owners of industries to voluntarily inform the government about the pollution they were creating.<ref name="Ruparelia"/><ref name="Barry">{{cite news|last1=Barry|first1=Ellen|last2=Bagri|first2=Neha Thirani|title=Narendra Modi, Favoring Growth in India, Pares Back Environmental Rules|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/05/world/indian-leader-favoring-growth-sweeps-away-environmental-rules.html|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=4 December 2014|access-date=23 October 2021}}</ref> The changes were made with the aim of accelerating approval for industrial projects. Other changes included reducing ministry oversight on small mining projects, and no longer requiring approval from tribal councils for projects inside forested areas.<ref name="Barry"/> In addition, Modi lifted a moratorium on new industrial activity in the most polluted areas in the countries.<ref name="Kothari"/> The changes were welcomed by business people, but were criticized by environmentalists.<ref name="Barry"/>


Under the UPA government that preceded Modi's administration, field trials of [[Genetically modified food|Genetically Modified crops]] had essentially put on hold, after protests from farmers fearing for their livelihoods.<ref name="GM crops">{{cite journal|last1=Kumar|first1=Sanjay|title=India eases stance on GM crop trials|journal=Nature|date=14 May 2015|volume=521 |issue=7551|pages=138–9|doi=10.1038/521138a|pmid=25971488|bibcode=2015Natur.521..138K|doi-access=free}}</ref> Under the Modi government these restrictions were gradually lifted.<ref name="GM crops"/> The government received some criticism for freezing the bank accounts of environmental group [[Greenpeace]], citing financial irregularities, although a leaked government report said that the freeze had to do with Greenpeace's opposition to GM crops.<ref name="GM crops"/>
Under the UPA government that preceded Modi's administration, field trials of [[Genetically modified food|Genetically Modified crops]] had essentially put on hold, after protests from farmers fearing for their livelihoods.<ref name="GM crops">{{cite journal|last1=Kumar|first1=Sanjay|title=India eases stance on GM crop trials|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]|date=12 May 2015|volume=521 |issue=7551|pages=138–9|doi=10.1038/521138a|pmid=25971488|bibcode=2015Natur.521..138K|doi-access=free}}</ref> Under the Modi government these restrictions were gradually lifted.<ref name="GM crops"/> The government received some criticism for freezing the bank accounts of environmental group [[Greenpeace]], citing financial irregularities, although a leaked government report said that the freeze had to do with Greenpeace's opposition to GM crops.<ref name="GM crops"/>


At the [[CoP21 Climate Conference]] on 30 November 2015 Modi announced the founding of an [[International Solar Alliance]] (ISA). The headquarters of the ISA would be located in [[Gurgaon]], and would receive support from the Indian government for a few years. All tropical countries were invited to join the alliance.<ref>{{citation |title=Modi launches International Solar Alliance |url=http://thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/modi-launches-international-solar-alliance/article7934560.ece |work=[[The Hindu]] |date=1 December 2015 }}</ref>
At the [[CoP21 Climate Conference]] on 30 November 2015 Modi announced the founding of an [[International Solar Alliance]] (ISA). The headquarters of the ISA would be located in [[Gurgaon]], and would receive support from the Indian government for a few years. All tropical countries were invited to join the alliance.<ref>{{citation |title=Modi launches International Solar Alliance |url=http://thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/modi-launches-international-solar-alliance/article7934560.ece |work=[[The Hindu]] |date=1 December 2015 |last1=Ananthakrishnan |first1=G. |access-date=23 October 2021 }}</ref>
He was also awarded the [[Champions of the Earth|United Nations Champions of the Earth award]] in 2018 for his environmental policies.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Chaudhury|first=Dipanjan Roy|title=United Nations 'Champion of Earth' award for PM Narendra Modi|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/un-champion-of-earth-award-for-pm-narendra-modi/articleshow/65973252.cms?from=mdr|access-date=2020-11-24}}</ref>
He was also awarded the [[Champions of the Earth|United Nations Champions of the Earth award]] in 2018 for his environmental policies.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Chaudhury|first=Dipanjan Roy|title=United Nations 'Champion of Earth' award for PM Narendra Modi|work=[[The Economic Times]]|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/un-champion-of-earth-award-for-pm-narendra-modi/articleshow/65973252.cms?from=mdr|date=2018-09-27|access-date=2020-11-24}}</ref>


==Governance and other initiatives==
==Governance and other initiatives==


Modi's first year as prime minister saw significant centralisation of power relative to previous administrations.<ref name="Manor"/><ref name="Wyatt">{{cite journal|last1=Wyatt|first1=Andrew|title=India in 2014|journal=Asian Survey|date=2015|volume=55|issue=1|pages=33–47|doi=10.1525/AS.2015.55.1.33|url=http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/files/34843877/FINAL_PDF_offprint_AS5501_04_Wyatt_India.pdf}}</ref> Modi personally selected the civil servants who served under his ministers, frequently giving them instructions without involving the ministers themselves.<ref name="Manor"/> Modi's efforts at centralisation have been linked to an increase in the number of senior administration officials resigning their positions.<ref name="Manor"/> Although the government has a majority of seats in the Lok Sabha, it does not have one in the Rajya Sabha, which led to its policies frequently being stymied there. Thus, Modi resorted to passing a number of ordinances, or executive orders, to enact his policies, leading to further centralisation of power.<ref name="Ronojoy">{{cite journal|last1=Sen|first1=Ronojoy|title=House Matters: The BJP, Modi and Parliament|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=776–790|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200|s2cid=147683722}}</ref> In 2014, the Prime Minister's Office prevented [[Gopal Subramaniam]] from being appointed to the Supreme Court. The stated reason was that his conduct in the [[2G spectrum allocation case]] had been suspect: commentators stated it was because he had been the ''amicus curiae'' in the [[Death of Sohrabuddin Sheikh|Sohrabuddin Sheikh case]], which had implicated BJP leaders including Modi's aide [[Amit Shah]].<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The government also passed a bill increasing the control that it had over the appointment of judges, and reducing that of the judiciary.<ref name="Stepan">{{cite journal|last1=Stepan|first1=Alfred|title=India, Sri Lanka, and the Majoritarian Danger|journal=Journal of Democracy|date=January 2015|volume=26|issue=1|pages=128–140|doi=10.1353/jod.2015.0006|s2cid=153861198}}</ref>
Modi's first year as prime minister saw significant centralisation of power relative to previous administrations.<ref name="Manor"/><ref name="Wyatt">{{cite journal|last1=Wyatt|first1=Andrew|title=India in 2014|journal=[[Asian Survey]]|date=2015|volume=55|issue=1|pages=33–47|doi=10.1525/AS.2015.55.1.33|url=http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/files/34843877/FINAL_PDF_offprint_AS5501_04_Wyatt_India.pdf}}</ref> Modi personally selected the civil servants who served under his ministers, frequently giving them instructions without involving the ministers themselves.<ref name="Manor"/> Modi's efforts at centralisation have been linked to an increase in the number of senior administration officials resigning their positions.<ref name="Manor"/> Although the government has a majority of seats in the Lok Sabha, it does not have one in the Rajya Sabha, which led to its policies frequently being stymied there. Thus, Modi resorted to passing a number of ordinances, or executive orders, to enact his policies, leading to further centralisation of power.<ref name="Ronojoy">{{cite journal|last1=Sen|first1=Ronojoy|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200?journalCode=csas20|title=House Matters: The BJP, Modi and Parliament|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=776–790|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200|s2cid=147683722}}</ref> In 2014, the Prime Minister's Office prevented [[Gopal Subramaniam]] from being appointed to the Supreme Court. The stated reason was that his conduct in the [[2G spectrum allocation case]] had been suspect: commentators stated it was because he had been the ''amicus curiae'' in the [[Death of Sohrabuddin Sheikh|Sohrabuddin Sheikh case]], which had implicated BJP leaders including Modi's aide [[Amit Shah]].<ref name="Ruparelia"/> The government also passed a bill increasing the control that it had over the appointment of judges, and reducing that of the judiciary.<ref name="Stepan">{{cite journal|last1=Stepan|first1=Alfred|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/565644|title=India, Sri Lanka, and the Majoritarian Danger|journal=[[Journal of Democracy]]|date=January 2015|volume=26|issue=1|pages=128–140|doi=10.1353/jod.2015.0006|s2cid=153861198}}</ref>


On 31 December 2014, Modi announced that the [[Planning Commission (India)|Planning Commission]] had been scrapped. It was replaced with a body called the National Institution for Transforming India, or [[NITI Aayog]].<ref name="Reuters 2015">{{cite news| url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/01/01/india-planningcommission-modi-idINKBN0KA1NA20150101 | work=Reuters | title=Modi replaces Planning Commission, aiming to boost growth | date=1 January 2015}}</ref><ref name="Sengupta">{{cite journal|last1=Sengupta|first1=Mitu|title=Modi Planning: What the NITI Aayog Suggests about the Aspirations and Practices of the Modi Government|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=791–806|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1088609|s2cid=156027018}}</ref> The Planning Commission was a legacy of the [[Indian Independence movement]], although critics said that it was slowing economic growth.<ref name="Patnaik">{{cite journal|last1=Patnaik|first1=Prabhat|title=From the Planning Commission to the NITI Aayog|journal=Economic & Political Weekly|date=24 January 2015|volume=50|issue=4}}</ref> The new body includes the leaders of all 29 Indian states, but its full-time staff report directly to the prime minister.<ref name="Reuters 2015"/> The move had the effect of greatly centralising the power previously with the planning commission in the person of the prime minister.<ref name="Ruparelia">{{cite journal|last1=Ruparelia|first1=Sanjay|title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=755–775|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|s2cid=155182560}}</ref><ref name="Ronojoy"/><ref name="Reuters 2015"/><ref name="Sengupta"/><ref name="Patnaik"/> It also reduced the extent of control individual states had over their financial allocation from the union government,<ref name="Sengupta"/><ref name="Patnaik"/> and unlike the planning commission, it does not have the power to allocate funds.<ref name="Sengupta"/> The planning commission had received heavy criticism in previous years for creating inefficiency in the government, and of not filling its role of improving social welfare: however, since the economic liberalisation of the 1990s, it had been the major government body responsible for measures related to social justice.<ref name="Sengupta"/>
On 31 December 2014, Modi announced that the [[Planning Commission (India)|Planning Commission]] had been scrapped. It was replaced with a body called the National Institution for Transforming India, or [[NITI Aayog]].<ref name="Reuters 2015">{{cite news| url=http://in.reuters.com/article/india-planningcommission-modi-idINKBN0KA1NA20150101 | work=[[Reuters]] | title=Modi replaces Planning Commission, aiming to boost growth | date=1 January 2015 |access-date=23 October 2021}}</ref><ref name="Sengupta">{{cite journal|last1=Sengupta|first1=Mitu|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00856401.2015.1088609?journalCode=csas20|title=Modi Planning: What the NITI Aayog Suggests about the Aspirations and Practices of the Modi Government|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=791–806|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1088609|s2cid=156027018}}</ref> The Planning Commission was a legacy of the [[Indian Independence movement]], although critics said that it was slowing economic growth.<ref name="Patnaik">{{cite journal|last1=Patnaik|first1=Prabhat|title=From the Planning Commission to the NITI Aayog|url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/4/commentary/planning-commission-niti-aayog.html|journal=[[Economic & Political Weekly]]|date=24 January 2015|access-date=23 October 2021|volume=50|issue=4}}</ref> The new body includes the leaders of all 29 Indian states, but its full-time staff report directly to the prime minister.<ref name="Reuters 2015"/> The move had the effect of greatly centralising the power previously with the planning commission in the person of the prime minister.<ref name="Ruparelia">{{cite journal|last1=Ruparelia|first1=Sanjay|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974?journalCode=csas20|title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India|journal=Journal of South Asian Studies|date=2015|volume=38|issue=4|pages=755–775|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|s2cid=155182560}}</ref><ref name="Ronojoy"/><ref name="Reuters 2015"/><ref name="Sengupta"/><ref name="Patnaik"/> It also reduced the extent of control individual states had over their financial allocation from the union government,<ref name="Sengupta"/><ref name="Patnaik"/> and unlike the planning commission, it does not have the power to allocate funds.<ref name="Sengupta"/> The planning commission had received heavy criticism in previous years for creating inefficiency in the government, and of not filling its role of improving social welfare: however, since the economic liberalisation of the 1990s, it had been the major government body responsible for measures related to social justice.<ref name="Sengupta"/>


As Prime Minister, Modi announced the abolition of a number of regulations previously placed on Indian businesses, such as a complex permit and inspection system. The move was aimed at reducing [[red tape]] and making it easier to do business.<ref>{{citation |url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5badad82-3ff6-11e4-a381-00144feabdc0.html|title=Modi tackles India's 'Licence Raj' with a thousand cuts|work=Financial Times}}</ref><ref>{{citation |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-takes-on-bureaucratic-red-tape-with-series-of-changes-1413476879|title=India Takes On Bureaucratic Red Tape With Series of Changes|first=Niharika|last=Mandhana|date=16 October 2014|work=WSJ}}</ref> Modi also ordered reform among the bureaucrats of the [[Indian Administrative Service]] to ensure a more efficient government bureaucracy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/it-s-all-work-no-holiday-for-babus-in-modi-govt/article1-1345644.aspx |title=It's all work, no holiday for babus in Modi govt &#124; india |publisher=Hindustan Times }}</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Gowen |first=Annie |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/no-golf-long-days-are-new-norm-for-indias-bureaucrats/2014/07/10/661b4f82-06d9-11e4-8a6a-19355c7e870a_story.html |title=No golf, long days are new norm for India's bureaucrats |work=The Washington Post |date=11 July 2014 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref>
As Prime Minister, Modi announced the abolition of a number of regulations previously placed on Indian businesses, such as a complex permit and inspection system. The move was aimed at reducing [[red tape]] and making it easier to do business.<ref>{{citation |first=Amy|last=Kazmin|url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5badad82-3ff6-11e4-a381-00144feabdc0.html|title=Modi tackles India's 'Licence Raj' with a thousand cuts|work=[[Financial Times]]|date=21 September 2014|access-date=23 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{citation |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-takes-on-bureaucratic-red-tape-with-series-of-changes-1413476879|title=India Takes On Bureaucratic Red Tape With Series of Changes|first=Niharika|last=Mandhana|date=16 October 2014|access-date=23 October 2021|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref> Modi also ordered reform among the bureaucrats of the [[Indian Administrative Service]] to ensure a more efficient government bureaucracy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/it-s-all-work-no-holiday-for-babus-in-modi-govt/article1-1345644.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510093308/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/it-s-all-work-no-holiday-for-babus-in-modi-govt/article1-1345644.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-date=10 May 2015 |date=10 May 2015 |access-date=23 October 2021 |title=It's all work, no holiday for babus in Modi govt |work=[[Hindustan Times]] }}</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Gowen |first=Annie |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/no-golf-long-days-are-new-norm-for-indias-bureaucrats/2014/07/10/661b4f82-06d9-11e4-8a6a-19355c7e870a_story.html |title=No golf, long days are new norm for India's bureaucrats |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=11 July 2014 |access-date=3 October 2015}}</ref>


The Modi government launched a crackdown against a number of civil society organisations. Several tens of thousands of organisations were investigated by the [[Intelligence Bureau (India)|Intelligence Bureau]] in the first year of the administration, on the grounds that they were slowing economic growth.<ref name="Manor"/> International [[humanitarian aid]] organisation [[Medecins Sans Frontieres]] was among the groups that were put under pressure.<ref name="Manor"/> Other organisations affected included the [[Sierra Club]] and [[Avaaz]].<ref name="Ruparelia"/> Cases of sedition were filed against individuals criticising the government.<ref name="Manor"/> This led to discontent with Modi's style of functioning within the BJP, and drew comparisons to the governing style of [[Indira Gandhi]].<ref name="Manor"/><ref name="Ronojoy"/>
The Modi government launched a crackdown against a number of civil society organisations. Several tens of thousands of organisations were investigated by the [[Intelligence Bureau (India)|Intelligence Bureau]] in the first year of the administration, on the grounds that they were slowing economic growth.<ref name="Manor"/> International [[humanitarian aid]] organisation [[Medecins Sans Frontieres]] was among the groups that were put under pressure.<ref name="Manor"/> Other organisations affected included the [[Sierra Club]] and [[Avaaz]].<ref name="Ruparelia"/> Cases of sedition were filed against individuals criticising the government.<ref name="Manor"/> This led to discontent with Modi's style of functioning within the BJP, and drew comparisons to the governing style of [[Indira Gandhi]].<ref name="Manor"/><ref name="Ronojoy"/>


He started a monthly radio program titled "[[Mann ki Baat]]" on 3 October 2014.<ref>{{citation |title=PM Modi thanks nation on 'Mann Ki Baat' anniversary, AIR plans survey |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-modi-thanks-nation-on-mann-ki-baat-anniversary-air-plans-survey |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=3 October 2015 }}</ref>
He started a monthly radio program titled "[[Mann ki Baat]]" on 3 October 2014.<ref>{{citation |title=PM Modi thanks nation on 'Mann Ki Baat' anniversary, AIR plans survey |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-modi-thanks-nation-on-mann-ki-baat-anniversary-air-plans-survey |work=[[The Indian Express]] |date=3 October 2015 |access-date=23 October 2021 }}</ref>


===Repealing obsolete laws===
===Repealing obsolete laws===
{{See also|List of legislations repealed under Modi government}}
{{See also|List of legislations repealed under Modi government}}
Modi repealed 1,200 obsolete laws in first three years as prime minister, against a total of 1,301 such laws repealed by previous governments over a span of 64 years.<ref>{{citation |title=Goodbye, old laws: Modi government scraps 1,200 redundant Acts, 1,824 more identified for repeal |url=http://m.indiatoday.in/story/narendra-modi-law-ministry-ravi-shankar-prasad/1/984539.html |work=[[India Today]] |date=22 June 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=1,159 obsolete laws scrapped by Modi govt; 1,301 junked in previous 64 years |url=http://timesofindia.com/india/1159-obsolete-laws-scrapped-by-Modi-govt-1301-junked-in-previous-64-years/articleshow/52333875.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=8 June 2016|access-date=17 February 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Report card: Two years later, here's how much Modi has delivered on his promises |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-two-years-of-modi-sarkar-what-was-promised-and-what-delivered-2216613 |work=[[Daily News and Analysis]] |date=26 May 2016|access-date=17 February 2017 }}</ref> The legislations passed in the parliament for the purpose include [[Repealing and Amending Act, 2015]], [[Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2015]], [[Repealing and Amending Act, 2016]], [[Repealing and Amending Act, 2017]] and [[Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2017]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=archaic laws: Lok Sabha passes 2 bills to repeal 245 archaic laws - The Economic Times|url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/lok-sabha-passes-2-bills-to-repeal-245-archaic-laws/amp_articleshow/62135666.cms|access-date=2021-01-11|website=[[The Economic Times|economictimes.com]]}}</ref>
Modi repealed 1,200 obsolete laws in first three years as prime minister, against a total of 1,301 such laws repealed by previous governments over a span of 64 years.<ref>{{citation |first=Harish V. |last=Nair |title=Goodbye, old laws: Modi government scraps 1,200 redundant Acts, 1,824 more identified for repeal |url=http://m.indiatoday.in/story/narendra-modi-law-ministry-ravi-shankar-prasad/1/984539.html |work=[[India Today]] |date=22 June 2017 |access-date=23 October 2021 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |first=Vishwa |last=Mohan |title=1,159 obsolete laws scrapped by Modi govt; 1,301 junked in previous 64 years |url=http://timesofindia.com/india/1159-obsolete-laws-scrapped-by-Modi-govt-1301-junked-in-previous-64-years/articleshow/52333875.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=19 May 2016|access-date=17 February 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Report card: Two years later, here's how much Modi has delivered on his promises |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-two-years-of-modi-sarkar-what-was-promised-and-what-delivered-2216613 |work=[[Daily News and Analysis]] |date=26 May 2016|access-date=17 February 2017 }}</ref> The legislations passed in the parliament for the purpose include [[Repealing and Amending Act, 2015]], [[Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2015]], [[Repealing and Amending Act, 2016]], [[Repealing and Amending Act, 2017]] and [[Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2017]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Lok Sabha passes 2 bills to repeal 245 archaic laws |url=https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/lok-sabha-passes-2-bills-to-repeal-245-archaic-laws/amp_articleshow/62135666.cms|date=2017-12-19|access-date=2021-01-11|website=[[The Economic Times]]}}</ref>


===IT policy===
===IT policy===
Modi launched the [[Digital India]] programme, which has the goal of ensuring that government services are available electronically, building infrastructure so rural areas get high-speed Internet access, boosting manufacturing of electronic goods in the country, and promoting [[digital literacy]].<ref>{{citation |title=Govt launches 22 new schemes under Digital India programme |url=http://www.livemint.com/Home-Page/QgFspv8UzykQP99AukcSjI/Govt-launches-22-new-schemes-under-Digital-India-programme.html |work=[[Live Mint]] |date=29 December 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/dzh7hnHafnvVI8hoIlNqPI/GST-to-take-care-of-many-of-ecommerce-firms-tax-issues-IT.html |title=GST to take care of many of e-commerce firms' tax issues: IT minister |work=[[Live Mint]] |date=21 November 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |url=http://digitalindiainsight.com/what-is-digital-india-campaign |title=What is Digital India Campaign? Impact of Digital India by 2019 &#124; Digital India Project Campaign |work=Digitalindiainsight.com }}</ref> Under the programme, 400 railway Stations across the country are being equipped with Wi-Fi technology.<ref>{{citation |title=High-speed facility in 400 railway stations by 2017-end |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Vijayawada/highspeed-facility-in-400-railway-stations-by-2017end/article8562921.ece |work=[[The Hindu]] |date=6 May 2016 }}</ref> In the [[2017 Union Budget of India]], POS machines, scanners, fingerprint readers, iris scanners and micro ATMs were exempted from all kinds of custom duties. The internet penetration in India rose from 20 percent in 2014 to 28.7 percent in 2016.<ref>{{citation |title=A digital India Inc |url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/a-digital-india-inc/article9515492.ece |work=[[The Hindu Business Line]] |date=1 February 2017 }}</ref>
Modi launched the [[Digital India]] programme, which has the goal of ensuring that government services are available electronically, building infrastructure so rural areas get high-speed Internet access, boosting manufacturing of electronic goods in the country, and promoting [[digital literacy]].<ref>{{citation |first1=Saurabh |last1=Kumar |first2=Moulishree |last2=Srivastava |title=Govt launches 22 new schemes under Digital India programme |url=http://www.livemint.com/Home-Page/QgFspv8UzykQP99AukcSjI/Govt-launches-22-new-schemes-under-Digital-India-programme.html |work=[[Live Mint]] |date=29 December 2015 |access-date=23 October 2021 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |first1=Leslie |last1=D'Monte |first2=Moulishree |last2=Srivastava |url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/dzh7hnHafnvVI8hoIlNqPI/GST-to-take-care-of-many-of-ecommerce-firms-tax-issues-IT.html |title=GST to take care of many of e-commerce firms' tax issues: IT minister |work=[[Live Mint]] |date=21 November 2014 |access-date=23 October 2021 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |author=Sumit |url=http://digitalindiainsight.com/what-is-digital-india-campaign |title=What is Digital India Campaign? Jackpot or Failure: Explained |work=Digitalindiainsight.com |date=9 October 2021 |access-date=23 October 2021 }}</ref> Under the programme, 400 railway Stations across the country are being equipped with Wi-Fi technology.<ref>{{citation |title=High-speed facility in 400 railway stations by 2017-end |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Vijayawada/highspeed-facility-in-400-railway-stations-by-2017end/article8562921.ece |work=[[The Hindu]] |date=6 May 2016 |access-date=23 October 2021 |last1=Srinivas |first1=Rajulapudi }}</ref> In the [[2017 Union Budget of India]], POS machines, scanners, fingerprint readers, iris scanners and micro ATMs were exempted from all kinds of custom duties. The internet penetration in India rose from 20 percent in 2014 to 28.7 percent in 2016.<ref>{{citation |first=Rajalakshmi |last=Nirmal |title=A digital India Inc |url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/a-digital-india-inc/article9515492.ece |work=[[The Hindu Business Line]] |date=1 February 2017 |access-date=23 October 2021 }}</ref>


===Partnerships===
===Partnerships===
"Unnat Bharat Abhiyan" involve engaging with neighbouring communities and using technologies for their upliftment.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2014-09-12|title=IITs, others to develop technologies for rural development|url=https://zeenews.india.com/news/sci-tech/iits-others-to-develop-technologies-for-rural-development_1468600.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124095956/https://zeenews.india.com/news/sci-tech/iits-others-to-develop-technologies-for-rural-development_1468600.html|archive-date=2020-11-24|access-date=2021-01-11|website=[[Zee News]]|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2014-10-30|title=IITs to adopt ten villagesIITs to adopt ten villages|url=https://zeenews.india.com/news/india/iits-to-adopt-ten-villagesiits-to-adopt-ten-villages_1491828.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124103139/https://zeenews.india.com/news/india/iits-to-adopt-ten-villagesiits-to-adopt-ten-villages_1491828.html|archive-date=2020-11-24|access-date=2021-01-11|website=[[Zee News]]|language=en}}</ref>
"Unnat Bharat Abhiyan" involve engaging with neighbouring communities and using technologies for their upliftment.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2014-09-12|title=IITs, others to develop technologies for rural development|url=https://zeenews.india.com/news/sci-tech/iits-others-to-develop-technologies-for-rural-development_1468600.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124095956/https://zeenews.india.com/news/sci-tech/iits-others-to-develop-technologies-for-rural-development_1468600.html|archive-date=2020-11-24|access-date=2021-01-11|website=[[Zee News]]|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2014-10-30|title=IITs to adopt ten villagesIITs to adopt ten villages|url=https://zeenews.india.com/news/india/iits-to-adopt-ten-villagesiits-to-adopt-ten-villages_1491828.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124103139/https://zeenews.india.com/news/india/iits-to-adopt-ten-villagesiits-to-adopt-ten-villages_1491828.html|archive-date=2020-11-24|access-date=2021-01-11|website=[[Zee News]]|language=en}}</ref>
== See also ==
* [[Indian Government]]
* [[Bhartiya Janta Party]]
* [[Second Modi ministry]]
* [[2019 Indian general election]]


==References==
==References==
Line 210: Line 217:
|title=Marching with a Billion: Analysing Narendra Modi's Government at Midterm |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BJ4kDwAAQBAJ |volume=|pages=|date=2017 |publisher=[[Penguin books]] |isbn=978-9-386-49584-6 }}
|title=Marching with a Billion: Analysing Narendra Modi's Government at Midterm |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BJ4kDwAAQBAJ |volume=|pages=|date=2017 |publisher=[[Penguin books]] |isbn=978-9-386-49584-6 }}
* {{Cite news|last=|first=|date=2019-02-26|title=Viewpoint: Balakot air strikes raise stakes in India-Pakistan stand-off|language=en-GB|work=[[BBC News]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227061938/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|archive-date=2019-02-27}}
* {{Cite news|last=|first=|date=2019-02-26|title=Viewpoint: Balakot air strikes raise stakes in India-Pakistan stand-off|language=en-GB|work=[[BBC News]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190227061938/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47370608|archive-date=2019-02-27}}
* {{Cite journal|last1=Estrada|first1=De|last2=Sullivan|first2=Kate|date=2020-01-01|title=Modi and the reinvention of Indian foreign policy|url=https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/96/1/257/5697497|journal=International Affairs|language=en|volume=96|issue=1|pages=257–258|doi=10.1093/ia/iiz261|issn=0020-5850|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last1=Estrada|first1=Kate Sullivan de|date=2020-01-01|title=Modi and the reinvention of Indian foreign policy|url=https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/96/1/257/5697497|journal=International Affairs|language=en|volume=96|issue=1|pages=257–258|doi=10.1093/ia/iiz261|issn=0020-5850|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last1=Pant|first1=Harsh V.|last2=Joshi|first2=Yogesh|date=2017-01-01|title=Indo-US relations under Modi: the strategic logic underlying the embrace|url=https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/93/1/133/2731401|journal=International Affairs|language=en|volume=93|issue=1|pages=133–146|doi=10.1093/ia/iiw028|issn=0020-5850|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last1=Pant|first1=Harsh V.|last2=Joshi|first2=Yogesh|date=2017-01-01|title=Indo-US relations under Modi: the strategic logic underlying the embrace|url=https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/93/1/133/2731401|journal=International Affairs|language=en|volume=93|issue=1|pages=133–146|doi=10.1093/ia/iiw028|issn=0020-5850|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Scott|first=David|date=2017-01-01|title=The rise of India: UK perspectives|url=https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/93/1/165/2731384|journal=International Affairs|language=en|volume=93|issue=1|pages=165–188|doi=10.1093/ia/iiw007|issn=0020-5850|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Scott|first=David|date=2017-01-01|title=The rise of India: UK perspectives|url=https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/93/1/165/2731384|journal=International Affairs|language=en|volume=93|issue=1|pages=165–188|doi=10.1093/ia/iiw007|issn=0020-5850|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Maiorano|first=Diego|date=2015-04-03|title=Early Trends and Prospects for Modi's Prime Ministership|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2015.1024511|journal=The International Spectator|volume=50|issue=2|pages=75–92|doi=10.1080/03932729.2015.1024511|s2cid=155228179|issn=0393-2729|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Maiorano|first=Diego|date=2015-04-03|title=Early Trends and Prospects for Modi's Prime Ministership|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2015.1024511|journal=The International Spectator|volume=50|issue=2|pages=75–92|doi=10.1080/03932729.2015.1024511|s2cid=155228179|issn=0393-2729|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Mukherjee|first=Kunal|date=2016-01-02|title=Security Challenges Faced by the Modi Administration in the Indo-Pacific Region|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2016.1151800|journal=Journal of Comparative Asian Development|volume=15|issue=1|pages=156–178|doi=10.1080/15339114.2016.1151800|s2cid=156779369|issn=1533-9114|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Mukherjee|first=Kunal|date=2016-01-02|title=Security Challenges Faced by the Modi Administration in the Indo-Pacific Region|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2016.1151800|journal=Journal of Comparative Asian Development|volume=15|issue=1|pages=156–178|doi=10.1080/15339114.2016.1151800|s2cid=156779369|issn=1533-9114|via=}}
* {{Cite book|last1=Connors|first1=Michael K.|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_New_Global_Politics_of_the_Asia_Paci/ddUrDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0|title=The New Global Politics of the Asia-Pacific: Conflict and Cooperation in the Asian Century|last2=Davison|first2=Rémy|last3=Dosch|first3=Jörn|date=2017-10-30|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-23267-4|location=|pages=[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ddUrDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT100&dq=Premiership+of+Narendra+Modi&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjbhoDhm63uAhX763MBHT3VAkMQ6AEwA3oECAQQAg Era of Modi]|language=en}}
* {{Cite book|last1=Connors|first1=Michael K.|url=https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_New_Global_Politics_of_the_Asia_Paci/ddUrDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0|title=The New Global Politics of the Asia-Pacific: Conflict and Cooperation in the Asian Century|last2=Davison|first2=Rémy|last3=Dosch|first3=Jörn|date=2017-10-30|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=978-1-317-23267-4|location=|pages=[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ddUrDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT100&dq=Premiership+of+Narendra+Modi&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjbhoDhm63uAhX763MBHT3VAkMQ6AEwA3oECAQQAg Era of Modi]|language=en}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Sen|first=Ronojoy|date=2015-10-02|title=House Matters: The BJP, Modi and Parliament|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=776–790|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200|s2cid=147683722|issn=0085-6401|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Sen|first=Ronojoy|date=2015-10-02|title=House Matters: The BJP, Modi and Parliament|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=776–790|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200|s2cid=147683722|issn=0085-6401|via=}}
* {{Cite book|last=Mukhopadhyay|first=Nilanjan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q2_3rQEACAAJ|title=Narendra Modi: The Man, the Times|date=2014-12-28|publisher=Tranquebar Press|isbn=978-93-83260-48-5|location=|pages=|language=en}}
* {{Cite book|last=Mukhopadhyay|first=Nilanjan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q2_3rQEACAAJ|title=Narendra Modi: The Man, the Times|date=2014-12-28|publisher=Tranquebar Press|isbn=978-93-83260-48-5|location=|pages=|language=en}}
* {{Cite book|last=Komireddi|first=K. S.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pAulDwAAQBAJ&q=Premiership+of+Narendra+Modi|title=Malevolent Republic: A Short History of the New India|date=2019-07-31|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-1-78738-294-7|location=|pages=|language=en}}
* {{Cite book|last=Komireddi|first=K. S.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pAulDwAAQBAJ&q=Premiership+of+Narendra+Modi|title=Malevolent Republic: A Short History of the New India|date=2019-07-31|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-1-78738-294-7|location=|pages=|language=en}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Tharamangalam|first=Joseph|date=2016-07-02|title=Moditva in India: a threat to inclusive growth and democracy|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2016.1196656|journal=Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement|volume=37|issue=3|pages=298–315|doi=10.1080/02255189.2016.1196656|s2cid=133500638|issn=0225-5189|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Tharamangalam|first=Joseph|date=2016-07-02|title=Moditva in India: a threat to inclusive growth and democracy|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2016.1196656|journal=Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement|volume=37|issue=3|pages=298–315|doi=10.1080/02255189.2016.1196656|s2cid=133500638|issn=0225-5189|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Ruparelia|first=Sanjay|date=2015-10-02|title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=755–775|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|s2cid=155182560|issn=0085-6401|via=}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Ruparelia|first=Sanjay|date=2015-10-02|title='Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|journal=South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=755–775|doi=10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974|s2cid=155182560|issn=0085-6401|via=}}
Line 227: Line 234:
{{Commons}}
{{Commons}}


* {{Britannica|author=[https://www.britannica.com/contributor/Shanthie-Mariet-DSouza/7638007 Shanthie Mariet D'Souza]|id=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Narendra-Modi/Premiership}}
{{Wikinews}}


{{Portal bar|Politics|Conservatism|India|2010s|2020s}}{{Government Schemes in India}}{{Premiership of Narendra Modi|state=collapsed}}
{{Government Schemes in India}}{{Premiership of Narendra Modi|state=collapsed}}


[[Category:Narendra Modi]]
[[Category:Narendra Modi]]
[[Category:Indian premierships]]
[[Category:Indian premierships]]
[[Category:Modi administration]]
[[Category:Modi administration]]

Latest revision as of 19:19, 14 August 2023


The premiership of Narendra Modi began on 26 May 2014 with his swearing-in as the Prime Minister of India at the Rashtrapati Bhavan. He became the 14th Prime Minister of India,[1] succeeding Manmohan Singh of the Indian National Congress. Modi's first cabinet consisted of 45 ministers, 25 fewer than the previous United Progressive Alliance government.[2] 21 ministers were added to the council of ministers on 9 November 2014.[3]

Official portrait of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, November 2020 (cropped).jpg
Premiership of Narendra Modi
26 May 2014 – present
PartyBharatiya Janata Party
 
First term
26 May 2014 – 30 May 2019
CabinetFirst
Election2014
Appointed byPresident Pranab Mukherjee
SeatVaranasi
 
Second term
30 May 2019 – Present
CabinetSecond
Election2019
Appointed byPresident Ram Nath Kovind
SeatVaranasi
 
 
Emblem of India.svg
narendramodi.in

In 2019, he was elected as the Prime Minister of India for the second time and sworn in at the Rashtrapati Bhavan on 30 May 2019.[4] His second cabinet consisted of 54 ministers[5] and initially had 51 ministers, which was expanded to 77 ministers during a reshuffle on 7 July 2021.[6] His premiership has, to a considerable extent, practiced high command culture.[7]

Economic policiesEdit

OverallEdit

The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatization and liberalization of the economy, based on a neoliberal framework.[3][8] Modi liberalized India's foreign direct investment policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defense and the railways.[3][9][10][11] Other reforms included removing many of the country's labor laws, to make it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them.[8] These reforms met with support from institutions such as the World Bank, but opposition from scholars within the country. The labor laws also drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.[8] The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, a constituent of the Sangh Parihar, stated that the reforms would hurt laborers by making it easier for corporations to exploit them.[3]

In his first budget, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley promised to gradually reduce the budgetary deficit from 4.1% to 3% over two years and to divest from shares in public banks.[3] Over Modi's first year in office, the Indian GDP grew at a rate of 7.5%, making it the fastest-growing large economy.[8] For this the basis was a revised formula introduced a year after he took office, which surprised a lot of economists.[12] However, this rate of growth had fallen significantly to 6.1%, even by the revised metric, by his third year in office.[13] This fall has been blamed on the exercise of demonetisation of currency.[13]

The funds dedicated to poverty reduction programs and social welfare measures was greatly decreased by the Modi administration.[14] The money spent on social programs declined from 14.6% of GDP during the Congress government to 12.6% during Modi's first year in office.[3] Spending on health and family welfare declined by 15%, and on primary and secondary education, by 16%.[3] The budgetary allocation for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, or the "education for all" program, declined by 22%.[3] The government also lowered corporate taxes, abolished the wealth tax, and reduced customs duties on gold, jewelry, and increased sales taxes.[3] In October 2014, the Modi government deregulated diesel prices,[15] and later increased taxes on diesel and petrol.[3] In July 2014, Modi refused to sign a trade agreement that would permit the World Trade Organization to implement a deal agreed in Bali, citing lack of protection to Indian farmers and the needs of food security.[3] The addition to Indian airports grew by 23 percent in 2016 while the airfares dropped by over 25 percent.[16]

 
Modi at the launch of the Make in India program.

In September 2014, Modi introduced the Make in India initiative to encourage foreign companies to manufacture products in India, with the goal of turning India into a global manufacturing hub.[3][17] Supporters of economic liberalisation supported the initiative, while critics argued it would allow foreign corporations to capture a greater share of the Indian market.[3] In order to enable the construction of private industrial corridors, the Modi administration passed a land-reform bill that allowed it to acquire private agricultural land without conducting a social impact assessment, and without the consent of the farmers who owned it.[18] Under the previous bill, the government had required the consent of 80% of the owners of a piece of property before acquiring it for a private project: this requirement was waived.[19] The bill was passed via an executive order after it faced opposition in parliament, but was eventually allowed to lapse.[19]

The government substantially increased the percentage of central revenue directly granted to states, while decreasing the amount granted through various central government programs. Overall, states' share of revenue increased marginally.[14] The criteria upon which individual states' allocation was determined were changed, such that the revenue to 19 states increased, and that of 10 states decreased. Only one of the ten states was ruled by the BJP when the policy was enacted.[14]

The government signed large deals with General Electric and Alstom to supply India with 1,000 new diesel locomotives, as part of an effort to reform the Indian railway, which also included privatisation efforts.[20][21] In December 2015, Modi's government signed an agreement with Japan to jointly build a bullet train system linking Mumbai and Ahmedabad.[22] The Indian government put forward a plan on converting 101 rivers into national waterways for the transport of goods and passengers. The government also began an ambitious program to increase the number of highways in the country,[23][24] allocating 700 billion (US$8.0 billion) to the project.[3]

On 25 June 2015, Modi launched a program intended to develop 100 smart cities.[25] The "Smart Cities" program is expected to bring IT companies an extra benefit of 20 billion (US$230 million).[26] He also launched a "smart villages" initiative, under which villages would be given Internet access, clean water, sanitation, and low-carbon energy, with Members of Parliament overseeing the program's implementation. The program had a stated goal of at least 2,500 smart villages by 2019.[26]

Give up LPG subsidy is a campaign launched in March 2015 by the Indian government led by Narendra Modi. It is aimed at motivating LPG users who can afford to pay the market price for LPG to voluntarily surrender their LPG subsidy.[27] As at 23 April 2016 1 crore ( 10 million) people had voluntarily given up the subsidy.[28] The surrendered subsidy is being used by the government to provide cooking gas connections to poor families in rural households free of cost.[29] Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Delhi and Tamil Nadu are the top five states to give up the subsidy.[30]

Under his government, Railway budget was merged into the Union Budget of India. The date of presenting budget was moved from 28 to 1 February and financial cycle was changed from July to April. Further, the artificial distinction between planned and non-planned expenditure was removed. Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), considered as a hurdle in FDI, was scrapped by the Modi government.[31]

In 2017, Modi government put in place the Goods and Services Tax, the biggest tax reform in the country since independence. It subsumed around 17 different taxes and became effective from 1 July 2017.[32]

Over the first four years of Modi's premiership, India's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.23%, higher than the rate of 6.39% under the previous government.[33] The level of income inequality increased,[34] while an internal government report said that in 2017, unemployment had increased to its highest level in 45 years. The loss of jobs was attributed to the 2016 demonetisation, and to the effects of the Goods and Services Tax.[35][36] The last year of Modi's first term didn't see much economic development and focused on the policies of Defence and on the basic formula of Hindutva.[37] His government focused on pension facilities for old-age group people and depressed sections of society.[38] The economic growth rate in 2018-19 was recorded to be 6.1%, which was lower than the average rate of the first four years of premiership.[39] The fall in the growth rate was again attributed to the 2016 demonetisation and to the effects of the GST[40] on the economy. In the year 2020, due to the nationwide lockdown and shutdown of the industries, the Indian economy suffered a major economic loss.[41][42] It experienced a historic fall of -23% rate of the GDP,[43] following which, Prime Minister Modi launched a movement called Atmanirbhar Bharat along with other movements and schemes to support the small scale and indigenous businesses to support the economy and to boycott Chinese products.[44][45] Following this, Prime Minister Modi also announced a scheme of 20 lakh crore (US$230 billion) as a relief package for all damages to the economy.[46]

Financial inclusionEdit

Modi launched Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) in August 2014. The initiative aimed to create bank accounts and debit cards for 150 million families, and to allow them an overdraft of 5,000 (US$57) and accident insurance. After the launch, 125.4 million accounts were opened by January 2015.[3]

File:Mudra yojna logo.jpg
Mudra yojna logo

Modi government launched the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY) in April 2015. Under this scheme, loans up to 1 million (US$11,000) are given for non-agricultural activities under the three categories: Shishu (loans up to 50,000 (US$570)); Kishore (loans from 50,000 (US$570) to 500,000 (US$5,700)) and Tarun (loans from 500,000 (US$5,700) to 1 million (US$11,000)). According to a report by the SKOCH Group, this scheme has generated 1.68 crore incremental jobs in the first two years until September 2017.[47]

Anti-corruption initiativesEdit

In his first cabinet decision, Modi set up a team to investigate black money.[48][49][50][51][52][53][54] Over the first four years of Modi's premiership, India's GDP grew at an average rate of 7.23%, higher than the rate of 6.39% under the previous government.[33] The level of income inequality increased,[34] while an internal government report said that in 2017, unemployment had increased to its highest level in 45 years. The loss of jobs was attributed to the 2016 demonetisation, and to the effects of the Goods and Services Tax.[35][36]

DemonetisationEdit

On 8 November 2016, the government demonetised ₹500 and ₹1000 banknotes, with the stated intention of curbing corruption, black money, the use of counterfeit currency, and terrorism.[55] The move led to widespread protests throughout the country, including one by opposition parties, which stalled the winter session of parliament.[56] In the days following the demonetisation, banks across the country faced severe cash shortages,[57][58][59] which had detrimental effects on a number of small businesses, on agriculture, and on transportation. People seeking to exchange their notes had lengthy waits, and several deaths were linked to the rush to exchange cash.[60][61] As a combined effect of Modi's announcement and the US presidential election results, the Indian stock indices BSE SENSEX and NIFTY 50 declined steeply.[62]

The decision met with mixed initial reactions. Several bankers like Arundhati Bhattacharya (Chairperson of State Bank of India) and Chanda Kochhar (MD & CEO of ICICI Bank) appreciated the move in the sense that it would help curb black money.[63] Businessmen Anand Mahindra (Mahindra Group), Sajjan Jindal (JSW Group), Kunal Bahl (Snapdeal and FreeCharge) also supported the move adding that it would also accelerate e-commerce.[63] Infosys founder N. R. Narayana Murthy praised the move.[64][65]

Former Chief Election Commissioner of India S. Y. Quraishi said demonetisation could lead to long term electoral reforms.[66] Indian social activist Anna Hazare hailed demonetisation as a revolutionary step.[67][68][69] The President of India Pranab Mukherjee welcomed the demonetisation move by calling it bold step.[70][71][72][73] The opinion of the masses varied both ways on micro-blogs and social media sites like Twitter.[74]

By and large, international response was positive which saw the move as a bold crackdown on corruption.[75][76][77] International Monetary Fund (IMF) issued a statement supporting Modi's efforts to fight corruption by the demonetisation policy.[75]

Chinese state media Global Times praised the move and termed it as "fierce fight against black money and corruption."[76] Former Prime Minister of Finland and Vice-President of European Commission Jyrki Katainen welcomed the demonetisation move stressing that bringing transparency will strengthen Indian economy.[78][79] BBC's South Asia Correspondent Justin Rowlatt in his article praised the move for its secrecy and success and elaborated on reason behind demonetisation.[80] Tim Worstall termed the demonetisation as welcome macroeconomic effect in his article in Forbes magazine.[81] Swedish Minister of Enterprise Mikael Damberg supported the move by calling it bold decision.[77]

Shell companiesEdit

After demonetisation of ₹500 and ₹1000 rupee notes[82][83][84] various authorities noticed a surge in shell companies depositing cash in banks, possibly in an attempt to hide the real owner of the wealth. In response, in July 2017, the authorities ordered nearly 2 lakh shell companies to be shut down while Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) imposed trading restrictions on 162 listed entities as shell companies.[85][86] In September 2017, the government froze bank accounts of nearly 2 lakh shell companies.[87] A day after, the Corporate Affairs ministry decided to ban around 300,000 directors of shell companies from serving on the boards of other firms to track down the beneficial owners of suspected shell companies and take penal action against those who divert funds from these shell companies.[88]

InfrastructureEdit

Modi government passed the National Waterways Act, 2016 to develop 111 National Waterways in India.[89]

Religious and social policiesEdit

HindutvaEdit

During the 2014 election campaign, Modi expressed hopes for a tenure without communal violence. The BJP sought to identify itself with political leaders known to have opposed Hindu nationalism, including B. R. Ambedkar, Subhas Chandra Bose, and Ram Manohar Lohia.[14] The campaign also saw the use of rhetoric based on Hindutva, however, by BJP leaders in certain states.[90] Communal tensions were played upon especially in Uttar Pradesh and the states of Northeast India.[90] A proposal for the controversial Uniform Civil Code was a part of the BJP's election manifesto.[91]

Several state governments headed by the BJP have enacted policies aligned with Hindutva after the election of Modi as prime minister. The government of Maharashtra banned the killing of cows in 2014.[90] The government of Haryana made changes to its education policy that introduced Hindu religious elements into the curriculum.[92] External affairs minister Sushma Swaraj suggested after the election that the Bhagvad Gita be adopted as India's "national book".[90] The Modi administration has generally avoided directly supporting policies related to a Hindutva agenda.[90] There has been an increase in the activities of a number of other Hindu nationalist organisations, sometimes with the support of the government.[14][90] The incidents included a campaign against "Love Jihad", a religious conversion programme, and attempts to celebrate Nathuram Godse, the assassin of Mahatma Gandhi, by members of the right wing Hindu Mahasabha.[14] The attempts at religious conversion have been described by the VHP and other organisations involved with them as attempts at "reconversion" from Islam or Christianity. There have been a number of reports of intimidation or coercion of the subjects during these attempts.[90] Officials in the government, including the Home Minister, have defended the attempts.[90] There were additional incidents of violence targeted at religious minorities by Hindu nationalists.[14] Modi refused to remove a government minister from her position after a popular outcry resulted from her referring to religious minorities as "bastards."[14] Commentators have suggested, however, that the violence was perpetrated by radical Hindu nationalists to undercut the authority of Modi.[14]

The Modi administration appointed Yellapragada Sudershan Rao, who had previously been associated with the RSS, chairperson of the Indian Council of Historical Research.[91] In reaction to his appointment, other historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the ruling party, questioned his credentials as a historian. Several stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.[91][93][94]

The government began formulating a New Education Policy, or NEP, soon after its election. As of March 2016, this policy had yet to be implemented.[92] This was the third education policy introduced by the Indian government, following those of 1968 and 1986.[92] The policy was described as having overtones of Hindutva.[92] The RSS had a role in its creation, and it did not explicitly mention the goals of "socialism, secularism and democracy" that had been mentioned in the first two policies.[92] The policy emphasized the education of minority students, as well as those of economically backward groups, in particular on improving enrollment in schools among those groups.[92] The policy proposed bringing religious educational institutions under the Right to Education Act.[92] There was also a debate about removing caste-based reservation in favor of reservation based on income, a move supported by the RSS, but which was criticized as being discriminatory on the basis of caste.[92]

On 8 January 2019, India's lower house of parliament approves a bill that would grant residency and citizenship rights to non-Muslim immigrants who entered the country before 2014 - including Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from three Muslim-majority countries (Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan) - and make them eligible for Indian citizenship. The Bill excludes Muslims.[95][96]

 
Modi at the Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi.

On 6 August 2019, the Supreme Court of India passed resolution on creation of Ram Mandir on the disputed land of Ayodhya.[97] The verdict also stated to provide 5 acres (20,000 m2) for creation of a mosque on another part of the land. The land was given to the Sunni Waqf Board.[98] At that time, the government of Narendra Modi was said responsible for the decision by the court [source????]. On 5 August 2019, Narendra Modi held the Bhoomipujan at the Ayodhya. He became the first prime minister to visit Ram Janmabhoomi and Hanuman Garhi.[99]

Social welfareEdit

In June 2015, Modi launched the "Housing for All By 2022" project, which intends to eliminate slums in India by building about 20 million affordable homes for India's urban poor.[100][101] A total of 4,718 camps were held from 2014 to 2017, benefiting 6.40 lakh beneficiaries under Assistance to Disabled Persons for Purchase/Fitting of Aids/Appliances (ADIP) scheme, as compared to 37 camps from 2012 to 2014.[102]

In 2019, a law was passed to provide 10% reservation to Economically weaker sections.[103]

Modi also launched Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) on 1 May 2016 to distribute 50 million LPG connections to women of BPL families.[104][105][106] A budgetary allocation of 800 billion (US$9.2 billion) was made for the scheme. In the first year of its launch, the connections distributed were 22 million against the target of 15 million. As of 23 October 2017, 30 million connections were distributed, 44% of which were given to families belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.[107] The number crossed 58 million by December 2018.[108] In 2018 Union Budget of India, its scope was widened to include 80 million poor households.[109] 21,000 awareness camps were conducted by oil marketing companies (OMC).[108] The scheme led to an increase in LPG consumption by 56% in 2019 as compared to 2014.[110]

The Muslim Women Bill, 2017Edit

The BJP Government formulated the bill after 100 cases of instant triple talaq in the country since the Supreme Court judgement in August 2017.[111] On 28 December 2017, Lok Sabha passed The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017.[112] The bill make instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddah) in any form — spoken, in writing or by electronic means such as email, SMS and WhatsApp illegal and void, with up to three years in jail for the husband. MPs from RJD, AIMIM, BJD, AIADMK and AIML[clarification needed] opposed the bill, calling it arbitrary in nature and a faulty proposal, while Congress supported the Bill tabled in Lok Sabha by law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad.[113][114] 19 amendments were moved in Lok Sabha but all were rejected.

The central government re-introduced the bill in the Lok Sabha on 21 June 2019.[115][116] The bill was subsequently passed by the Lok Sabha on 25 July 2019[117] and then by Rajya Sabha on 30 July 2019[118] and received assent from President Kovind on 31 July 2019.[119] After its enactment, the Act became retrospectibly effective from 19 September 2018.

Health and sanitation policiesEdit

In his first year as prime minister Modi reduced the amount of money spent by the government on healthcare.[120] The Modi government launched a "New Health Policy" in January 2015. The policy did not increase the government's spending on healthcare, but placed emphasis on the role of private healthcare organisations.[121] In its budget for the second year after it took office, the Modi government reduced healthcare spending by 15%.[121] This represented a shift away from the policy of the previous Congress government, which had supported programs to support public health goals including reducing child and maternal mortality rates.[121] The National Health Mission, which included public health programs targeted at these indices received nearly 25% less funds in 2015 than in the previous year.[121] 15 national health programs, including those aimed at controlling tobacco use and supporting healthcare for the elderly, were merged with the National Health Mission, and received less funds than in previous years.[121] Modi initially appointed Harsh Vardhan, a doctor and an advocate of tobacco control, minister of health. However, Vardhan was removed in November 2015.[121] The government also proposed introducing stricter packaging laws for tobacco, but this effort was postponed because of the efforts of the tobacco lobby.[121]

On 2 October 2014, Modi launched the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan ("Clean India") campaign. The states goals of the campaign included eliminating open defecation, eliminating manual scavenging, and improving waste management practices.[122][123] The campaign was announced on the anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi's birthday, and was planned to achieve these aims in five years, or in time for the 150th anniversary of his birth.[123] As part of the programme, the Indian government began the construction of millions toilets in rural areas, as well as efforts to encourage people to use them.[124][125][126] The government also announced plans to build new sewage treatment plants.[127] The administration plans to construct 60 million toilets by 2019. The construction projects have faced allegations of corruption, and have faced severe difficulty in getting people to use the toilets constructed for them.[123][124][125] Modi has generally emphasized his government's efforts at sanitation as a means of ensuring good health.[121] He has also advocated yoga and traditional forms of medicine.[121] An article in the medical journal Lancet stated that the country "might have taken a few steps back in public health" under Modi.[121]

Modi's government developed a draft policy to introduce a universal health care system, known as the National Health Assurance Mission. Under this plan, the government was to provide free drugs, diagnostic treatment, and insurance coverage for serious ailments, although budgetary concerns have delayed its implementation.[128][129][130] The government announced "Ayushman Bharat" (National Health Protection Mission) in the 2018 Union Budget of India. It is World's largest health protection scheme, also being called ModiCare.[131][132][133] The scheme will help 10 crore families in their medical need.[134] Under the Ayushman Bharat programme, there is a new scheme has been announced by Arun Jaitley, the finance minister of India, called National Health Protection Scheme, providing a health insurance cover of ₹5 lac a family per annum.[135] More than a lakh people have taken benefit of the scheme till October 2018.[136]

Education and skill developmentEdit

Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY), a skill development initiative scheme of the Government of India for recognition and standardisation of skills.[137] Cabinet approved an outlay of 120 billion (US$1.4 billion) for the project. The scheme has a target to train 1 crore Indian youth from 2016 to 2020.[138] As of 18 July 2016, 17.93 lakh candidates were trained out of 18 lakh who enrolled for the scheme. The aim of the PMKVY scheme is to encourage aptitude towards employable skills and to increase working efficiency of probable and existing daily wage earners, by giving monetary awards and rewards and by providing quality training to them. Average award amount per person has been kept as 8,000 (US$92). Those wage earners already possessing a standard level of skill will be given recognition as per scheme and average award amount for them is ₹2000 to ₹2500. In the initial year, a target to distribute 15 billion (US$170 million) has been laid down for the scheme. Training programmes have been worked out on the basis of National Occupational Standards (NOS) and qualification packs specifically developed in various sectors of skills. For this qualification plans and quality plans have been developed by various Sector Skill Councils (SSC) created with participation of Industries. National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) has been made coordinating and driving agency for the same.[139]

An outlay of 120 billion (US$1.4 billion) has been approved by the cabinet for this project.[138] The scheme has a target to train 1 crore Indian youth from 2016 to 2020.[138] As of 18 July 2016, 17.93 lakh candidates were trained out of 18 lakh who enrolled for the scheme.[139]

The government began formulating a New Education Policy, or NEP, soon after its election. This was the third education policy introduced by the Indian government, following those of 1968 and 1986. The policy was described as having overtones of Hindutva.[140] The RSS had a role in its creation, and it did not explicitly mention the goals of "socialism, secularism and democracy" that had been mentioned in the first two policies. The policy emphasised the education of minority students, as well as those of economically backward groups, in particular on improving enrolment in schools among those groups. The policy proposed bringing religious educational institutions under the Right to Education Act. There was also a debate about removing caste-based reservation in favour of reservation based on income, a move supported by the RSS, but which was criticised as being discriminatory on the basis of caste.[92] As of October 2018, the new policy had not been implemented.[141][142]

In July 2020, the government unveiled the National Education Policy 2020, "envisioning an India-centric education system that contributes directly to transforming our nation sustainably into an equitable and vibrant knowledge society by providing high-quality education to all" [143] and making "India a global knowledge superpower".[144]

Foreign policyEdit

 
Modi with other BRICS leaders in 2016. Left to right: Temer, Modi, Xi, Putin and Zuma.

Foreign policy played a relatively small role in Modi's election campaign, and did not feature prominently in the BJP's election manifesto.[145] Modi invited all the other leaders of SAARC countries to the ceremony where he was sworn in as prime minister.[146][147] He was the first Indian prime minister to do so.[148] Observers have stated that due to Modi portraying himself as a strong and nationalist leader during his election campaign, he would be politically unable to follow a policy of restraint that India had previously followed after terrorist attacks, and is more likely to have a military response.[146][149]

Modi's foreign policy focused on improving economic ties, improving security, and increased regional relations, which is very similar to the policy of the preceding INC government.[145] Modi continued his predecessor Manmohan Singh's policy of "multialignment."[150] This involved the use of regional multilateral institutions and strategic partnerships to further the interests of the Indian government.[150] The Modi administration tried to attract foreign investment in the Indian economy from several sources, especially in East Asia.[145] The Modi government also upgraded several of India's military alliances, although it was unable to conclude negotiations for a trilateral defense agreement with Japan and Australia.[145] As a part of this policy, the Modi government completed India's application to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, which is led by China and Russia. (SCO). It also joined the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank founded by China.[150] Together with the US government, it created a "Joint Strategic Vision" for the Indian and Pacific oceans.[150] The government also tried to improve relations with Islamic republics in the Middle East, such as Bahrain, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as with Israel, with the intent to also "link west."[150] Modi added five bilateral strategic partnerships to the 25 that had been agreed by his predecessors Singh and Vajpayee.[150]

During the first few months after the election, Modi made trips to a number of different countries to further the goals of his policy, and attended the BRICS, ASEAN, and G20 summits.[145] During these visits, Modi attempted to draw further foreign investment in the Indian economy,[145] with the use of slogans such as "Make in India" and "Digital India," put forward during a visit to Silicon Valley.[150] One of Modi's first visits as prime minister was to Nepal, during which he promised a billion USD in aid.[151] Another early visit was to Bhutan.[151] IModi also made several overtures to the United States, including multiple visits to that country.[147] While this was described as an unexpected development, due to the US having previously denied Modi a travel visa over his role during the 2002 Gujarat riots, it was also expected to strengthen diplomatic and trade relations between the two countries.[147] As of July 2016, Modi had made 51 trips to 42 countries with the intent of strengthening diplomatic relations.[152][153]

In 2015, the Indian parliament ratified a land exchange deal with Bangladesh about the India–Bangladesh enclaves, which had been initiated by the government of Manmohan Singh.[19] Modi's administration gave renewed attention to India's "Look East Policy", instituted in 1991. The policy was renamed the "Act East Policy", and involved directing Indian foreign policy towards East Asia and Southeast Asia.[150][154] The government signed agreements to improve land connectivity with Myanmar, through the state of Manipur. This represented a break with India's historic engagement with Myanmar, which prioritized border security over trade.[154]

He coined the concept of "three Ds" — democracy, demography and demand — to reflect the strength of the country.[155]

Defence policyEdit

During the 2014 election campaign, Modi and the BJP pledged to revisit India's nuclear weapons doctrine, and in particular India's historical policy of no-first-use.[156] The pressure to revise the doctrine came from a desire for assertiveness among Indian government and defence officials. Soon after being sworn in as Prime Minister, Modi said that no revision would take place in the immediate future.[156] The election manifesto of the BJP had also promised to deal with illegal immigration into India in the Northeast, as well as to be more firm in its handling of insurgent groups.[157] During the election campaign, Modi said that he would be willing to accommodate Hindu migrants who were being persecuted in Bangladesh, but those that came with "political objectives" would have to be sent back to Bangladesh.[157] The Modi government issued a notification allowing Hindu, Sikh, and Buddhist illegal immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh to legalize their residency in India.[157] The government described the measure as being taken for humanitarian reasons. However, it drew criticism from several Assamese organizations.[157]

Modi continued the previous INC administration's policy of increasing military spending every year, announcing an increase of 11% in the military budget in 2015.[158][159] This increase was larger than the average growth under the Congress.[158]

The Modi administration negotiated a peace agreement with the largest faction of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCM), which was announced in August 2015. The Naga insurgency in northwest India had begun in the 1950s.[157][160] The NSCM and the government had agreed to a ceasefire in 1997, but a peace accord had not previously been signed.[160] In 2015 the government abrogated a 15-year ceasefire with the Khaplang faction of the NSCM (NSCM-K). The NSCM-K responded with a series of attacks, which killed 18 people.[157] The Modi government carried out a raid across the border with Myanmar as a result, and labelled the NSCM-K a terrorist organization.[157]

Modi has repeatedly stated that Pakistan was an exporter of terrorism.[161][162] Modi increased the monetary compensation for victims of terrorist attacks, and stated that citizens of Azad Kashmir could also apply for this compensation.[163] In September 2016, he urged the BRICS to target and destroy funding channels of terrorist groups.[164] On 29 September 2016, the Indian Army stated that it had conducted a surgical strike on terror launchpads in PoK,[165] Pakistan denied the claim which they always do. The details of the confrontation were later released by the Indian Army. Video footages were released of the confrontations.[166][167]

Modi also played a crucial role and known for involving in 2017 China–India border standoff at the Doklam making the Defence policy strict against China and also strengthening relations with Bhutan.[168][169]

The Modi administration has been active in the Defence policy,[170] he has a major concern and soon on 14 February 2019, a convoy of vehicles carrying security personnel on the Jammu Srinagar National Highway was attacked by a vehicle-borne suicide bomber at Lethpora in the Pulwama district, Jammu and Kashmir, India.[171] The attack resulted in the deaths of 46 Central Reserve Police Force personnel and the attacker. The perpetrator of the attack was from Indian-administered Kashmir.[172] The responsibility for the attack was claimed by the Pakistan-based Islamistterrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed.[173] On 26 February, twelve Mirage 2000 jets of the Indian Air Force crossed the Line of Control and dropped bombs into Balakot, Pakistan. India claimed that it attacked a Jaish-e-Mohammed training camp and killed a large number of terrorists, reported to be between 300 and 350. Pakistan claimed that they quickly scrambled jets to intercept the IAF jets, who dropped their payloads to quickly return over the Line of Control.[174][175][176]

After the 2019 Lok Sabha election win, he made serious and strict defence policy against China and Pakistan.[177]

Following Galwan valley skirmishes, there were made serious policies against China.[178] On 17 June 2020, Modi addressed the nation regarding the Galwan skirmish, giving a firm message directed at China over the deaths of Indian soldiers.[179] The first communication since the start of the border dispute between the foreign ministers of China, Wang Yi and of India, S Jaishankar also happened after the Galwan skirmish. S Jaishankar accused the Chinese actions in Galwan to be "pre-meditated and planned".[180]

Environmental policiesEdit

 
Modi(right) at CoP21 Climate Conference, in Paris, announcing the founding of an International Solar Alliance (ISA). November 2015.

In naming his cabinet, Modi renamed the "Ministry of Environment and Forests" the "Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change."[181] In the first budget of the government, the money allotted to this ministry was reduced by more than 50%.[181] The new ministry also removed or diluted a number of laws related to environmental protection. These included no longer requiring clearance from the National Board for Wildlife for projects close to protected areas, and allowing certain projects to proceed before environmental clearance was received.[3][181] The government also tried to reconstitute the Wildlife board such that it no longer had representatives from non-governmental organisations: however, this move was prevented by the Supreme court.[181]

Modi also relaxed or abolished a number of other environmental regulations, particularly those related to industrial activity. A government committee stated that the existing system only served to create corruption, and that the government should instead rely on the owners of industries to voluntarily inform the government about the pollution they were creating.[3][182] The changes were made with the aim of accelerating approval for industrial projects. Other changes included reducing ministry oversight on small mining projects, and no longer requiring approval from tribal councils for projects inside forested areas.[182] In addition, Modi lifted a moratorium on new industrial activity in the most polluted areas in the countries.[181] The changes were welcomed by business people, but were criticized by environmentalists.[182]

Under the UPA government that preceded Modi's administration, field trials of Genetically Modified crops had essentially put on hold, after protests from farmers fearing for their livelihoods.[183] Under the Modi government these restrictions were gradually lifted.[183] The government received some criticism for freezing the bank accounts of environmental group Greenpeace, citing financial irregularities, although a leaked government report said that the freeze had to do with Greenpeace's opposition to GM crops.[183]

At the CoP21 Climate Conference on 30 November 2015 Modi announced the founding of an International Solar Alliance (ISA). The headquarters of the ISA would be located in Gurgaon, and would receive support from the Indian government for a few years. All tropical countries were invited to join the alliance.[184] He was also awarded the United Nations Champions of the Earth award in 2018 for his environmental policies.[185]

Governance and other initiativesEdit

Modi's first year as prime minister saw significant centralisation of power relative to previous administrations.[14][186] Modi personally selected the civil servants who served under his ministers, frequently giving them instructions without involving the ministers themselves.[14] Modi's efforts at centralisation have been linked to an increase in the number of senior administration officials resigning their positions.[14] Although the government has a majority of seats in the Lok Sabha, it does not have one in the Rajya Sabha, which led to its policies frequently being stymied there. Thus, Modi resorted to passing a number of ordinances, or executive orders, to enact his policies, leading to further centralisation of power.[19] In 2014, the Prime Minister's Office prevented Gopal Subramaniam from being appointed to the Supreme Court. The stated reason was that his conduct in the 2G spectrum allocation case had been suspect: commentators stated it was because he had been the amicus curiae in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case, which had implicated BJP leaders including Modi's aide Amit Shah.[3] The government also passed a bill increasing the control that it had over the appointment of judges, and reducing that of the judiciary.[187]

On 31 December 2014, Modi announced that the Planning Commission had been scrapped. It was replaced with a body called the National Institution for Transforming India, or NITI Aayog.[188][189] The Planning Commission was a legacy of the Indian Independence movement, although critics said that it was slowing economic growth.[190] The new body includes the leaders of all 29 Indian states, but its full-time staff report directly to the prime minister.[188] The move had the effect of greatly centralising the power previously with the planning commission in the person of the prime minister.[3][19][188][189][190] It also reduced the extent of control individual states had over their financial allocation from the union government,[189][190] and unlike the planning commission, it does not have the power to allocate funds.[189] The planning commission had received heavy criticism in previous years for creating inefficiency in the government, and of not filling its role of improving social welfare: however, since the economic liberalisation of the 1990s, it had been the major government body responsible for measures related to social justice.[189]

As Prime Minister, Modi announced the abolition of a number of regulations previously placed on Indian businesses, such as a complex permit and inspection system. The move was aimed at reducing red tape and making it easier to do business.[191][192] Modi also ordered reform among the bureaucrats of the Indian Administrative Service to ensure a more efficient government bureaucracy.[193][194]

The Modi government launched a crackdown against a number of civil society organisations. Several tens of thousands of organisations were investigated by the Intelligence Bureau in the first year of the administration, on the grounds that they were slowing economic growth.[14] International humanitarian aid organisation Medecins Sans Frontieres was among the groups that were put under pressure.[14] Other organisations affected included the Sierra Club and Avaaz.[3] Cases of sedition were filed against individuals criticising the government.[14] This led to discontent with Modi's style of functioning within the BJP, and drew comparisons to the governing style of Indira Gandhi.[14][19]

He started a monthly radio program titled "Mann ki Baat" on 3 October 2014.[195]

Repealing obsolete lawsEdit

Modi repealed 1,200 obsolete laws in first three years as prime minister, against a total of 1,301 such laws repealed by previous governments over a span of 64 years.[196][197][198] The legislations passed in the parliament for the purpose include Repealing and Amending Act, 2015, Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2015, Repealing and Amending Act, 2016, Repealing and Amending Act, 2017 and Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2017.[199]

IT policyEdit

Modi launched the Digital India programme, which has the goal of ensuring that government services are available electronically, building infrastructure so rural areas get high-speed Internet access, boosting manufacturing of electronic goods in the country, and promoting digital literacy.[200][201][202] Under the programme, 400 railway Stations across the country are being equipped with Wi-Fi technology.[203] In the 2017 Union Budget of India, POS machines, scanners, fingerprint readers, iris scanners and micro ATMs were exempted from all kinds of custom duties. The internet penetration in India rose from 20 percent in 2014 to 28.7 percent in 2016.[204]

PartnershipsEdit

"Unnat Bharat Abhiyan" involve engaging with neighbouring communities and using technologies for their upliftment.[205][206]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

CitationsEdit

  1. "Narendra Modi appointed Prime Minister, swearing in on May 26". The Times of India. 20 May 2014. Retrieved 21 May 2014.
  2. Irfan, Hakeem (28 May 2014). "Narendra Modi saves Rs 125 crore by keeping Cabinet small". Dnaindia.com. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 Ruparelia, Sanjay (2015). "'Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 755–775. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974. S2CID 155182560.
  4. "Modi Swearing-in Highlights: New team blend of youthful energy, experience: PM". Live Mint. 30 May 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  5. "Who Gets What: Cabinet Portfolios Announced. Full List Here". NDTV. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  6. "Narendra Singh Tomar Takes Additional Charge of Food Processing Ministry After Harshimrat Badal Resigns". News18. 23 September 2020. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  7. "Frequent change of CMs in BJP-ruled states signs of growing high command culture". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 5 November 2021.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Shah, Alpa; Lerche, Jens (10 October 2015). "India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion". Economic & Political Weekly. 50 (41): 33–36. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
  9. Miglani, Sanjeev; Das, Krishna N. (10 November 2015). "India frees up foreign investment in 15 major sectors". Reuters India. Retrieved 10 October 2017.
  10. "Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 per cent, opens up railways". The Economic Times. 7 August 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  11. Zhong, Raymond (20 November 2014). "Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough?". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  12. Zhong, Raymond; Kala, Anant Vijay (30 January 2015). "India Changes GDP Calculation Method". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  13. 13.0 13.1 "GDP growth slows to 6.1% in Jan-March: Indian economy finally bares its demonetisation scars". Hindustan Times. 1 June 2017. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  14. 14.00 14.01 14.02 14.03 14.04 14.05 14.06 14.07 14.08 14.09 14.10 14.11 14.12 14.13 14.14 14.15 Manor, James (2015). "A Precarious Enterprise? Multiple Antagonisms during Year One of the Modi Government". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 736–754. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1083644. S2CID 155472230.
  15. Shrivastava, Rahul (18 October 2014). "Narendra Modi Government Deregulates Diesel Prices". NDTV. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  16. Mahurkar 2017, p. 3.
  17. Choudhury, Gaurav. "Look East, Link West, says PM Modi at Make in India launch". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 27 September 2014. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (help)
  18. Guha, Abhijit (2015). "Dangers of Indian Reform of the Colonial Land Acquisition Law". Global Journal of Human-Social Science. 15 (1).
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 Sen, Ronojoy (2015). "House Matters: The BJP, Modi and Parliament". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 776–790. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1091200. S2CID 147683722.
  20. Riley, Charles (10 November 2015). "GE to build 1,000 trains for India in massive deal". CNNMoney. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  21. Narayan, Adi (9 November 2015). "India's $5.6 Billion GE, Alstom Deals Step Up Rail Overhaul". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  22. "Japan and India sign bullet train deal amid closer ties". BBC News. 13 December 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  23. Chitravanshi, Ruchika; Sikarwar, Deepshikha (25 May 2015). "Infrastructure push: Modi government steps up to improve roads, increase connectivity". The Economic Times. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  24. "PM Modi speeds up capital spending on roads, rural infrastructure, railways in April to boost growth". Hindustan Times. 29 May 2015. Archived from the original on 30 May 2015. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  25. "Cities should get chance to plan their growth, says Modi". The Hindu. New Delhi. 25 June 2015. Retrieved 27 June 2015.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Kaushik, Preetam (25 November 2014). "Smart Villages: Lending A Rural Flavour To Modi's Growth Agenda". Businessinsider.in. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  27. "About the GiveItUp Campaign". Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  28. "PM thanks 1 crore people for giving up LPG subsidy to help poor". 23 April 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  29. "Give-it-Up: Over 1 crore LPG users gave up their subsidies". The Economic Times. 12 April 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  30. "Maharashtra leads in surrendering LPG subsidy". The Indian Express. 23 April 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  31. Dutta, Prabhash K. (26 May 2017), "3 years of PM Narendra Modi: Here's how NDA government performed on economic front", India Today, retrieved 19 October 2021
  32. "3 years of Modi govt: 6 economic policies that have made BJP stronger, harder to defeat", Business Standard, 16 May 2017, retrieved 19 October 2021
  33. 33.0 33.1 "Budget 2019: Who gave India a higher GDP – Modi or Manmohan?". Business Today. 1 February 2019. Retrieved 6 February 2019.
  34. 34.0 34.1 V., Harini (14 November 2018). "India's economy is booming. Now comes the hard part". CNBC. Retrieved 6 February 2019.
  35. 35.0 35.1 Gettleman, Jeffrey; Kumar, Hari (31 January 2019). "India's Leader Is Accused of Hiding Unemployment Data Before Vote". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
  36. 36.0 36.1 Kumar, Manoj; Ghoshal, Devjyot (31 January 2019). "Indian jobless rate at multi-decade high, report says, in blow to Modi". Reuters. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
  37. Miller 2020, p. 67i.
  38. Sengupta, Hindol (October 2019). "The economic mind of Narendra Modi". Observer Research Foundation. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  39. "GDP growth rate for 2018-19 revised downwards to 6.1 pc". The Economic Times. 1 February 2020. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  40. Mishra, Asit Ranjan (10 January 2019). "What India GDP growth rate forecast for 2018-19 means". Live Mint. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  41. "Young Indian startups hit as investors get cautious". Outlook. 1 April 2020. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  42. "The Indian Economic Journal". SAGE Journals. Vol. 68, Issue 2. June 2020. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  43. "Pragati: Journal of Indian Economy". www.journalpressindia.com. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  44. Yunus, Muhammad (5 May 2020). "Muhammad Yunus: Don't plan for economic 'recovery' post-Covid. Redesign it from scratch". ThePrint. Archived from the original on 21 November 2020. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  45. Chaudhary, Monika; Sodani, P. R.; Das, Shankar (1 June 2020). "Effect of COVID-19 on Economy in India: Some Reflections for Policy and Programme". Journal of Health Management. 22 (2): 169–180. doi:10.1177/0972063420935541. ISSN 0972-0634.
  46. "PM Modi Speech Highlights: To battle Covid-19, Rs 20,00,000 crore economic package". The Indian Express. 13 May 2020. Archived from the original on 9 January 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  47. Srivats, K. R. (8 September 2017), "Report: PM scheme generates 1.68 crore jobs in 2 years", The Hindu Business Line, retrieved 20 October 2021
  48. "SIT formed to unearth black money – Narendra Modi Cabinet's first decision", The Times of India, 27 May 2014, archived from the original on 27 May 2014, retrieved 20 October 2021
  49. "Amit Shah hails Narendra Modi for "surgical strike" against black money, corruption", The Economic Times, 8 November 2016, retrieved 20 October 2021
  50. "Demonetisation is just the beginning in fight against black money: PM Modi", Business Standard, 22 November 2016, retrieved 20 October 2021
  51. "Demonetization is just the beginning of a long battle against black money: Modi", The New Indian Express, 22 November 2016, retrieved 20 October 2021
  52. Venkatesh, Mahua (10 November 2016), "Tackling black money: Modi govt's two-year report card", Hindustan Times, retrieved 20 October 2021
  53. Mahapatra, Dhananjay (9 November 2016), "Ban on 500, 1,000 notes to help curb corruption: SIT chief on black money", The Economic Times, retrieved 20 October 2021
  54. "Demonetisation will push GDP growth to ten percent: Meghwal", The New Indian Express, 4 December 2016, retrieved 20 October 2021
  55. "Rs 500, Rs 1000 currency notes stand abolished from midnight: PM Modi". The Indian Express. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  56. "Thousands Protest Across India Against Currency Policy". The New York Times. 28 November 2016. Archived from the original on 1 December 2016. Retrieved 4 December 2016.
  57. "Demonetisation: Chaos grows, queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend". The Indian Express. 12 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  58. "India demonetisation: Chaos as ATMs run dry". Al Jazeera. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  59. "Queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend". The Hindu. 12 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  60. "India: Demonetisation takes its toll on the poor". Al Jazeera. 16 November 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
  61. Vij, Shivam (15 November 2016). "Demonetisation Death Toll Rises To 25 And It's Only Been 6 Days". HuffPost. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
  62. "Sensex crashes 1,689 points on black money crackdown, U.S. election". The Hindu. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  63. 63.0 63.1 "Govt demonitises Rs 500, 1000 notes: Here is how India Inc reacted". The Indian Express. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  64. "Demonetisation: We should all be celebrating, says Narayana Murthy". The Economic Times. 10 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  65. "Move to withdraw Rs 500, 1,000 notes masterstroke: Narayana Murthy". The Indian Express. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  66. Quraishi, S. Y. (11 November 2016). "Demonetisation could lead to long-pending electoral reforms". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  67. "Anna Hazare hails demonetisation, calls it 'revolutionary' step". The Economic Times. 10 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  68. Khapre, Shubhangi (10 November 2016). "Demonetisation a revolutionary step to fight corruption: Anna Hazare". The Indian Express. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  69. "Notes Ban: Anna Hazare Hails PM Narendra Modi's 'Revolutionary' Step, Kejriwal Criticizes It". NDTV. 10 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  70. "President Pranab Mukherjee welcomes demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes". Zee News. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  71. "Demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes bold step: President Pranab Mukherjee". The Indian Express. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  72. "President Pranab Mukherjee Welcomes Demonetisation of Rs 1,000, Rs 500 Notes". NDTV. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  73. "A bold step, says Pranab Mukherjee". The Hindu. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  74. "Rs 500, 1000 notes pulled out: How Twitter reacted". The Times of India Blogs. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  75. 75.0 75.1 "IMF supports PM Modi's 'demonetization' move in fight against corruption". Business Standard. 11 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  76. 76.0 76.1 Aneja, Atul (14 November 2016). "State media praises Modi, but says he can learn from China's crusade against corruption". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  77. 77.0 77.1 S, Arun (13 November 2016). "Swedish ICT sector wouldn't have been so successful without Indian help". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  78. "European Union welcomes India's step on demonetisation". The Economic Times. 13 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  79. "India's Crackdown on Black Money Will Help Financial System: European Union". News18. 13 November 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  80. Rowlatt, Justin (14 November 2016). "Why India wiped out 86% of its cash overnight". BBC News. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  81. Worstall, Tim (17 November 2016). "India's Rs 500 And 1,000 Demonetization Is Lowering Interest Rates And Also Inflation". Forbes. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
  82. "India scraps 500 and 1,000 rupee bank notes overnight". BBC News. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  83. "In an attempt to curb black money, PM Narendra Modi declares Rs 500, 1000 notes to be invalid". The Economic Times. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  84. "Here is what PM Modi said about the new Rs 500, Rs 2000 notes and black money". India Today. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  85. "Cracking down on black money, scrutiny of shell firms stepped up". The Times of India. 16 August 2017. Archived from the original on 17 August 2017. Retrieved 16 August 2017.
  86. "In crackdown on shell companies, ED raids 110 locations in 16 states". The Times of India. 2 April 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  87. Shrivastava, Rahul (5 September 2017). "Black money crackdown: Bank accounts of 2.1 lakh shell companies frozen". India Today. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  88. Prasad, Gireesh Chandra (7 September 2017). "Govt blacklists 300,000 directors of shell companies". Live Mint. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  89. "10 waterways to be made operational next year: Nitin Gadkari", The Economic Times, 29 May 2017, retrieved 20 October 2021
  90. 90.0 90.1 90.2 90.3 90.4 90.5 90.6 90.7 Palshikar, Suhas (2015). "The BJP and Hindu Nationalism: Centrist Politics and Majoritarian Impulses". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 719–735. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089460. S2CID 147143160.
  91. 91.0 91.1 91.2 Ganguly, Sumit (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead". Journal of Democracy. 25 (4): 56–60. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0077. S2CID 154421269.
  92. 92.0 92.1 92.2 92.3 92.4 92.5 92.6 92.7 92.8 Sharma, Madhulika (31 March 2016). "Narendra Modi and the new education policy: retrospection, reform and reality". Journal of Asian Public Policy. 9 (2): 140–153. doi:10.1080/17516234.2016.1165330. S2CID 155156332.
  93. Joshua, Anita (16 July 2014). "Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  94. Mukul, Akshaya (18 July 2014). "Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection". The Times of India. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  95. "India's lower house passes citizenship bill that excludes Muslims". Al Jazeera. 8 January 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  96. Apoorvanand (12 January 2019). "The new citizenship bill and the Hinduisation of India". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  97. "Supreme Court hearing ends in Ayodhya dispute; orders reserved". The Hindu Business Line. Press Trust of India. 16 October 2019. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  98. "Ram Mandir verdict: Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case: Highlights". The Times of India. 9 November 2019. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  99. "Modi becomes first PM to visit Ram Janmabhoomi, Hanumangarhi temple in Ayodhya". The Financial Express. 5 August 2020. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  100. Shrivastava, Bhuma; Antony, Anto (26 July 2015), Mumbai Is Overflowing with Garbage, Bloomberg L.P., retrieved 21 October 2021
  101. "Cabinet Passes PM Modi's Ambitious "Housing For All By 2022″ Scheme For The Urban Poor. No More Slums?", Youthconnect.in, 19 June 2015, archived from the original on 21 June 2015, retrieved 21 October 2021
  102. Sharma, Nidhi (15 June 2017), "3 years of Modi government: A look at whether big-ticket schemes have brought 'achhe din' for common man", The Economic Times, retrieved 21 October 2021
  103. "Bill on 10% reservation for upper caste poor passes Parliament test: 10 things to know", Business Today, 10 January 2019, retrieved 21 October 2021
  104. Pradhan, Hemanta (6 June 2016), "Scheme for LPG to BPL families to be launched in Odisha", The Times of India, retrieved 21 October 2021
  105. Raja, Aditi (16 May 2016). "Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: 'UPA govt left coffers empty, making it difficult for us'". The Indian Express. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  106. Jacob, Shine (28 March 2017), "Modi's pet projects PMUY, Urja Ganga to cross Himalayan borders to Nepal", Business Standard, retrieved 21 October 2021
  107. Kumar, Saurabh (1 November 2017), "Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana: 3 cr LPG connections already issued, Oil Min seeks to serve another 3 cr beneficiaries", The Financial Express, retrieved 21 October 2021
  108. 108.0 108.1 Sharma, Anshu (19 December 2018), "Government expands eligibility criteria to meet Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana target", CNBC TV18, retrieved 21 October 2021
  109. Pathak, Kalpana (1 February 2018), "Budget 2018: Ujjwala scheme to cover 80 million families, says Arun Jaitley", Live Mint, retrieved 21 October 2021
  110. "Ujjwala scheme boosts India's LPG consumption to a record high in FY19", Business Standard, 3 May 2019, retrieved 21 October 2021
  111. "100 cases of instant triple talaq in the country since the SC judgement". The Times of India. 28 December 2017. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  112. Phukan, Sandeep (28 December 2017). "Lok Sabha passes triple talaq bill". The Hindu. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  113. Sharma, Sandipan (28 December 2017). "Congress' backing of triple talaq bill indicates it's gradually withdrawing from Muslim appeasement politics". Firstpost. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  114. "Congress backs triple talaq bill, Khurshid strikes discordant note". The Economic Times. 28 December 2017. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  115. "Fresh triple talaq Bill introduced in Lok Sabha, Oppositon members protest". The Economic Times. 21 June 2019. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
  116. "The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019" (PDF). Lok Sabha India Website. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  117. "Lok Sabha passes instant talaq bill; JDU walks out". The Economic Times. 26 July 2019. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  118. "Triple talaq bill passed in Rajya Sabha". India Today. 30 July 2019. Archived from the original on 30 July 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  119. "President Ram Nath Kovind gives assent to triple talaq Bill". The Hindu. 1 August 2019. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
  120. "Sparing Mr Modi's blushes". The Economist. 27 June 2015. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  121. 121.0 121.1 121.2 121.3 121.4 121.5 121.6 121.7 121.8 121.9 Sharma, Dinesh C. (23 May 2015). "India's BJP Government and health: 1 year on". The Lancet. 385 (9982): 2031–2. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60977-1. PMID 26009217. S2CID 10544022.
  122. Schmidt, Charles W. (November 2014). "Beyond Malnutrition: The Role of Sanitation in Stunted Growth". Environmental Health Perspectives. 122 (11): A298-303. doi:10.1289/ehp.122-A298. PMC 4216152. PMID 25360801.
  123. 123.0 123.1 123.2 Jeffrey, Robin (2015). "Clean India! Symbols, Policies and Tensions". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 807–819. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1088504. S2CID 147169571.
  124. 124.0 124.1 Lakshmi, Rama (4 June 2015). "India is building millions of toilets, but that's the easy part". The Washington Post. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  125. 125.0 125.1 Gahlot, Mandakini (3 April 2015). "India steps up efforts to encourage use of toilets". USA Today. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  126. "The Final Frontier". The Economist. 19 July 2014. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  127. Chaudhary, Archana (18 May 2015). "India Plans $1.3-Billion Sewage Plants in Towns Along the Ganges". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  128. Jones, Vanessa (31 March 2015). "Severe Cut-Backs Expected in PM's Ambitious Health Care Plan for India". Medindia. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  129. Kalra, Aditya (27 March 2015). "Exclusive: Modi govt puts brakes on India's universal health plan". Reuters. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  130. Sharma, Neetu Chandra (5 May 2015). "Modi government's healthcare schemes have brought smiles on some faces and disappointed a few: One year of Modi". India Today. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  131. Taneja, Richa (2 February 2018). "Modicare, World's Largest National Health Protection Scheme: All You Need To Know". NDTV. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  132. "'Modicare' to be launched on Aug 15 or Oct 2: Sources". The Times of India. 2 February 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  133. "Union Budget 2018: Ayushman Bharat to be the world's biggest healthcare scheme, says PM Modi". Business Today. 1 February 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  134. Pilla, Viswanath; Saraswathy, M (2 February 2018). "National Health Protection Scheme: Modi government has its task cut out". Moneycontrol. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  135. "Budget 2018: Jaitley announces 'world's largest healthcare programme'". The Hindu. 1 February 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  136. "Ayushman Bharat off to flying start; 1 lakh beneficiaries join Modi's insurance scheme in just 1 month", The Financial Express, 22 October 2018, retrieved 21 October 2021
  137. Krishna, Prabodh (7 July 2017). "Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana: Boon Or Bane". Businessworld. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  138. 138.0 138.1 138.2 "PM Modi-led Cabinet approves key decisions – from skilling 1 crore youth to NBCC disinvestment", The Financial Express, 13 July 2016, retrieved 21 October 2021
  139. 139.0 139.1 "17.93 lakh candidates trained under PMKVY as on July 18", Press Trust of India via Business Standard, 21 July 2016, retrieved 21 October 2021
  140. Puri, Natasha (30 August 2019). "A Review of the National Education Policy of the Government of India - The Need for Data and Dynamism in the 21st Century". Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Rochester, NY. SSRN 3472247.
  141. Nanda, Prashant K. (26 May 2018). "Education in 4 years of Modi government: Implementation remains a key hurdle". Live Mint. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
  142. "New national education policy may remain an unfinished agenda of Modi government before 2019 elections". The Financial Express. 20 October 2018. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
  143. Radhakrishnan, Akila (16 September 2019). "Draft New Education Policy and Schools for the Skilling Age". The Hindu Centre. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  144. "New Education Policy 2020 Highlights: School and higher education to see major changes". Hindustan Times. 29 July 2020. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  145. 145.0 145.1 145.2 145.3 145.4 145.5 Hall, Ian (2015). "Is a 'Modi doctrine' emerging in Indian foreign policy?". Australian Journal of International Affairs. 69 (3): 247–252. doi:10.1080/10357718.2014.1000263. S2CID 154260676.
  146. 146.0 146.1 Grare, Frederic (Winter 2015). "India–Pakistan Relations: Does Modi Matter?". The Washington Quarterly. 37 (4): 101–114. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2014.1002158. S2CID 153923833.
  147. 147.0 147.1 147.2 Pant, Harsh V. (Fall 2014). "Modi's Unexpected Boost to India-U.S. Relations". The Washington Quarterly. 37 (3): 97–112. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2014.978438. S2CID 154940836.
  148. Swami, Praveen (21 May 2014). "In a first, Modi invites SAARC leaders for his swearing-in". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 24 May 2014.
  149. Def 2016, p. 9-16.
  150. 150.0 150.1 150.2 150.3 150.4 150.5 150.6 150.7 Hall, Ian (2016). "Multialignment and Indian Foreign Policy under Narendra Modi". The Round Table. 105 (3): 271–286. doi:10.1080/00358533.2016.1180760. S2CID 156737878.
  151. 151.0 151.1 Mocko, Anne; Penjore, Dorji (2015). "Nepal and Bhutan in 2014". Asian Survey. 55 (1): 75–81. doi:10.1525/AS.2015.55.1.75. hdl:1885/13357.
  152. Chaudhury, Dipanjan Roy (26 July 2016), "Will PM Narendra Modi be India's most travelled PM ever?", The Economic Times, retrieved 22 October 2021
  153. Mehta, Nalin (4 June 2016), "Modi's whirlwind diplomacy and why his 41st foreign trip matters", The Times of India, archived from the original on 22 May 2019, retrieved 22 October 2021
  154. 154.0 154.1 Downie, Edmund (25 February 2015). "Manipur and India's 'Act East' Policy". The Diplomat. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
  155. Chaulia, Sreeram (4 December 2016), "How Modi Mobilizes the Indian Diaspora", The Globalist, retrieved 22 October 2021
  156. 156.0 156.1 Joshi, Shashank (May 2015). "India's Nuclear Anxieties: The Debate Over Doctrine". Arms Control Today. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
  157. 157.0 157.1 157.2 157.3 157.4 157.5 157.6 Singh, M. Amarjeet (2016). "Narendra Modi and Northeast India: development, insurgency and illegal migration". Journal of Asian Public Policy. 9 (2): 112–127. doi:10.1080/17516234.2016.1165313. S2CID 155231943.
  158. 158.0 158.1 C. Ladwig, Walter III (May 2015). "Indian Military Modernization and Conventional Deterrence in South Asia". Journal of Strategic Studies. 38 (5): 729–772. doi:10.1080/01402390.2015.1014473.
  159. Choudhury, Santanu (28 February 2015). "India Increases Military Budget By 11% to Nearly $40 Billion". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
  160. 160.0 160.1 Kashyap, Samudra Gupta (4 August 2015). "Towards the Govt-Naga peace accord: Everything you need to know". The Indian Express. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  161. "PM slams Pakistan on terror: 10 quotes from Narendra Modi's speech in Kozhikode". The Indian Express. 24 September 2016. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
  162. Balasubramanian, Shyam (5 September 2016), "One nation in South Asia spreading terrorism: PM Modi at G20 Summit", The Times of India, retrieved 22 October 2021
  163. Sandhu, Kamaljit Kaur (24 August 2016), "Modi stumps Pak, announces enhanced compensation for terror victims, PoK residents can apply too", India Today, retrieved 22 October 2021
  164. BRICS Must Intensify Efforts Against Terror, Its Sponsors: PM Modi, NDTV, 4 September 2016, retrieved 22 October 2021
  165. Chaubey, Bhupendra (10 October 2016), "Surgical Strikes Have Upended Pak Doctrine: LoC, Stock and Barrel", News18, retrieved 22 October 2021
  166. Barry, Ellen; Masood, Salman (29 September 2016), "India Claims 'Surgical Strikes' Across Line of Control in Kashmir", The New York Times, retrieved 1 October 2016
  167. "Kashmir attack: India 'launches strikes against militants'". BBC News. 29 September 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2016.
  168. Myers, Steven Lee; Barry, Ellen; Fisher, Max (26 July 2017). "How India and China Have Come to the Brink Over a Remote Mountain Pass". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 27 August 2017. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  169. "Bhutan welcomes end of Doklam standoff". The Times of India. 29 August 2017. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  170. Ministry of Defence (July 2016). "Key Accomplishments" (PDF). modigov.in. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 August 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  171. Rajagopalan, Rajeswari Pillai (15 February 2019). "New Terror Attack Exposes India's Limited Options". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 16 February 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  172. Abi-Habib, Maria; Yasir, Sameer; Kumar, Hari (15 February 2019). "India Blames Pakistan for Attack in Kashmir, Promising a Response". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 23 February 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021. The terrorist who claimed responsibility for the attack, Aadil Ahmad Dar, was from a village about six miles from where the Indian convoy was struck, in contrast to the fighters and weapons that once streamed in from Pakistani-occupied areas to sustain the insurgency. And the explosives he packed into his car appear to have been locally procured, security experts said.
  173. Shekhar, Raj (18 February 2019). "Pulwama attack mastermind Abdul Rasheed Ghazi killed by security forces in Kashmir". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 18 February 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  174. Prabhu, Sunil (26 February 2019). "India Strikes After Pulwama Terror Attack, Hits Biggest Jaish-e-Mohammed Camp In Balakot". NDTV. Archived from the original on 27 February 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  175. "Indian Air Strike Destroys Terror Camp In Pakistan, Upto 350 Terrorists Killed". BloombergQuint. 26 February 2019. Archived from the original on 27 February 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  176. "Viewpoint: Balakot air strikes raise stakes in India-Pakistan stand-off". BBC News. 26 February 2019. Archived from the original on 27 February 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  177. "PM Modi pushes for reduction in imports in defence sector". Live Mint. 1 May 2020. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  178. Subramaniam, Arjun (2020). Full Spectrum: India's Wars, 1972-2020. India: Harper Collins. pp. 451–471. ISBN 9789353578060.
  179. Laskar, Rezaul H.; Singh, Rahul; Patranobis, Sutirtho (18 June 2020). "India warns China of serious impact on ties, Modi talks of 'befitting' reply". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  180. Sudarshan, V. (1 June 2020). "A phantom called the Line of Actual Control". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  181. 181.0 181.1 181.2 181.3 181.4 Kothari, Ashish (27 September 2014). "A Hundred Days Closer to Ecological and Social Suicide". Economic & Political Weekly. 49 (39). Retrieved 23 October 2021.
  182. 182.0 182.1 182.2 Barry, Ellen; Bagri, Neha Thirani (4 December 2014). "Narendra Modi, Favoring Growth in India, Pares Back Environmental Rules". The New York Times. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
  183. 183.0 183.1 183.2 Kumar, Sanjay (12 May 2015). "India eases stance on GM crop trials". Nature. 521 (7551): 138–9. Bibcode:2015Natur.521..138K. doi:10.1038/521138a. PMID 25971488.
  184. Ananthakrishnan, G. (1 December 2015), "Modi launches International Solar Alliance", The Hindu, retrieved 23 October 2021
  185. Chaudhury, Dipanjan Roy (27 September 2018). "United Nations 'Champion of Earth' award for PM Narendra Modi". The Economic Times. Retrieved 24 November 2020.
  186. Wyatt, Andrew (2015). "India in 2014" (PDF). Asian Survey. 55 (1): 33–47. doi:10.1525/AS.2015.55.1.33.
  187. Stepan, Alfred (January 2015). "India, Sri Lanka, and the Majoritarian Danger". Journal of Democracy. 26 (1): 128–140. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0006. S2CID 153861198.
  188. 188.0 188.1 188.2 "Modi replaces Planning Commission, aiming to boost growth". Reuters. 1 January 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
  189. 189.0 189.1 189.2 189.3 189.4 Sengupta, Mitu (2015). "Modi Planning: What the NITI Aayog Suggests about the Aspirations and Practices of the Modi Government". Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (4): 791–806. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1088609. S2CID 156027018.
  190. 190.0 190.1 190.2 Patnaik, Prabhat (24 January 2015). "From the Planning Commission to the NITI Aayog". Economic & Political Weekly. 50 (4). Retrieved 23 October 2021.
  191. Kazmin, Amy (21 September 2014), "Modi tackles India's 'Licence Raj' with a thousand cuts", Financial Times, retrieved 23 October 2021
  192. Mandhana, Niharika (16 October 2014), "India Takes On Bureaucratic Red Tape With Series of Changes", The Wall Street Journal, retrieved 23 October 2021
  193. "It's all work, no holiday for babus in Modi govt". Hindustan Times. 10 May 2015. Archived from the original on 10 May 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
  194. Gowen, Annie (11 July 2014), "No golf, long days are new norm for India's bureaucrats", The Washington Post, retrieved 3 October 2015
  195. "PM Modi thanks nation on 'Mann Ki Baat' anniversary, AIR plans survey", The Indian Express, 3 October 2015, retrieved 23 October 2021
  196. Nair, Harish V. (22 June 2017), "Goodbye, old laws: Modi government scraps 1,200 redundant Acts, 1,824 more identified for repeal", India Today, retrieved 23 October 2021
  197. Mohan, Vishwa (19 May 2016), "1,159 obsolete laws scrapped by Modi govt; 1,301 junked in previous 64 years", The Times of India, retrieved 17 February 2017
  198. "Report card: Two years later, here's how much Modi has delivered on his promises", Daily News and Analysis, 26 May 2016, retrieved 17 February 2017
  199. "Lok Sabha passes 2 bills to repeal 245 archaic laws". The Economic Times. 19 December 2017. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  200. Kumar, Saurabh; Srivastava, Moulishree (29 December 2015), "Govt launches 22 new schemes under Digital India programme", Live Mint, retrieved 23 October 2021
  201. D'Monte, Leslie; Srivastava, Moulishree (21 November 2014), "GST to take care of many of e-commerce firms' tax issues: IT minister", Live Mint, retrieved 23 October 2021
  202. Sumit (9 October 2021), "What is Digital India Campaign? Jackpot or Failure: Explained", Digitalindiainsight.com, retrieved 23 October 2021
  203. Srinivas, Rajulapudi (6 May 2016), "High-speed facility in 400 railway stations by 2017-end", The Hindu, retrieved 23 October 2021
  204. Nirmal, Rajalakshmi (1 February 2017), "A digital India Inc", The Hindu Business Line, retrieved 23 October 2021
  205. "IITs, others to develop technologies for rural development". Zee News. 12 September 2014. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  206. "IITs to adopt ten villagesIITs to adopt ten villages". Zee News. 30 October 2014. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 11 January 2021.

SourcesEdit

External linksEdit