User talk:Harishroo

Welcome Harishroo!

Hello Harishroo. Welcome to Bharatpedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Editorial Oversight, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Bharatpedia   The five pillars of Bharatpedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Bharatpedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Bharatpedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost   Translate articles from Bharatpedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

• English
• Hinglish
• हिन्दी
• বাংলা
• ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
• भोजपुरी
• தமிழ்
• संस्कृतम्
• मराठी
• ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ

---

Sincerely, Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 17:22, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Appreciated,

Editorial Oversight Thank you for the warm welcome! It’s great to be here on Bharatpedia. I’m excited to be part of the community and contribute wherever I can. Looking forward to what’s ahead! Harishroo (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Rasha Kirmani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rasha Kirmani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Your first article. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. WikiDwarf (talk) 18:22, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Thanks WikiDwarf for you review. Can you explain me after how to move a page back ? Can I do it? Harishroo (talk) 18:32, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Thank you for your contributions to Bharatpedia. I moved the page to draft space because it currently has no sources to establish the subject's notability. For articles in the main namespace, please make sure there are reliable, independent third-party sources that provide significant coverage of the subject.

You can move the page back to the main namespace once you have added appropriate sources supporting its notability. However, before moving it back, please review Bharatpedia:Notability and Bharatpedia:Reliable sources to make sure the sources meet Bharatpedia's requirements.

Yes, you can move the page back yourself once it is ready. If you are unsure whether the sources are sufficient, you can also submit the draft for review using the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WikiDwarf (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Thanks again WikiDwarf, for your help kind help. I added a source where article actress telling about her. I added it as reference. You can review it. I will move it back. Harishroo (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2026 (IST)

I reviewed the source you added. Please note that a single reference is generally not enough to establish a subject's notability. Articles should have multiple reliable, independent third-party sources providing significant coverage of the subject.

The source you added is an interview with the actress, so it is not considered an independent source for establishing notability. Please do not move the page back to the main namespace yet.

Feel free to continue improving the draft by adding multiple independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. Once you have added appropriate sources, please submit the draft for review and I will be happy to take another look. WikiDwarf (talk) 19:00, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Thanks for your review WikiDwarf. I will find more sources similar to added information. Harishroo (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Also Kangana Sharma Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 19:08, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Sure Editorial Oversight, I done with Kangana Sharma Harishroo (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2026 (IST)

 Done maintenance tag removed Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 19:30, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Also done with Rasha Kirmani Harishroo (talk) 20:15, 26 September 2026 (IST)

In my opinion, Rasha Kirmani does not currently appear to meet notability guidelines as an actress. I believe it is too soon to have a standalone article about her. Kangana Sharma, on the other hand, has a more established body of work, including web series that I have watched myself..For Rasha Kirmani I would suggest moving the article to Draft space and waiting until more substantial independent coverage becomes available. This is just my personal opinion, and the article's notability should ultimately be assessed based on reliable sources and guidelines. What you think?@WikiDwarf Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 20:25, 26 September 2026 (IST)

Yes, you are right. The subject currently lacks the sources required to establish notability, so I have moved the page back to the draft namespace, where it can be improved. Once the subject has sufficient coverage from reliable, independent sources to establish notability, it can be submitted for review.

@Harishroo, please improve the page in the draft namespace and submit it for review once you have addressed the sourcing issues, rather than moving it back to the main namespace yourself.

Thank you. WikiDwarf (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2026 (IST)

No Worries, @WikiDwarf That’s Ohk. However, I also added sources before move it to main article you have to review than ones. Harishroo (talk) 00:08, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Yes, I reviewed the sources before draftifying the page. The current sources do not discuss the subject directly or in sufficient detail as required, and one of the sources is an interview. WikiDwarf (talk) 00:13, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Thanks for your help. It will be better in future. Harishroo (talk) 00:18, 27 September 2026 (IST)