m robot: Update article |
updated formatting as per guidelines and added references |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Short description|Indian law of suspension of state government}} | ||
{{redirect|Direct rule in India|direct rule over India in the colonial period|British Raj}} | {{redirect|Direct rule in India|direct rule over India in the colonial period|British Raj}} | ||
{{Use Indian English|date=November 2015}} | {{Use Indian English|date=November 2015}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}} | ||
In [[India]], '''President's rule''' is the suspension of state government and imposition of direct [[Union government]] rule in a [[States of India|state]]. Under Article 356 of the [[Constitution of India]], if a [[State governments of India|state government]] is unable to function according to Constitutional provisions, the Union government can take direct control of the state machinery. Subsequently, executive authority is exercised through the centrally appointed [[Governors of states of India|governor]], who has the authority to appoint other administrators to assist them. The administrators are usually nonpartisan retired civil servants. | In [[India]], '''President's rule''' is the suspension of state government and imposition of direct [[Union government]] rule in a [[States of India|state]]. Under Article 356 of the [[Constitution of India]], if a [[State governments of India|state government]] is unable to function according to Constitutional provisions, the Union government can take direct control of the state machinery. Subsequently, executive authority is exercised through the centrally appointed [[Governors of states of India|governor]], who has the authority to appoint other administrators to assist them. The administrators are usually nonpartisan retired [[civil services of India|civil servants]] not native to the state. | ||
When a state government is functioning correctly, it is run by an elected Council of Ministers responsible to the state's legislative assembly ([[Vidhan Sabha]]). The council is led by the [[Chief Minister (India)|chief minister]], who is the chief executive of the state; the Governor is only a constitutional head. However, during President's rule, the Council of Ministers is dissolved, vacating the office of Chief Minister. Furthermore, the Vidhan Sabha is either [[ | When a state government is functioning correctly, it is run by an elected Council of Ministers responsible to the state's legislative assembly ([[Vidhan Sabha]]). The council is led by the [[Chief Minister (India)|chief minister]], who is the chief executive of the state; the Governor is only a constitutional head. However, during President's rule, the Council of Ministers is dissolved, later on vacating the office of Chief Minister. Furthermore, the Vidhan Sabha is either [[Prorogation|prorogued]] or [[Dissolution of parliament|dissolved]], necessitating a new election. | ||
Prior to 2019, the [[Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir|constitution]] of the state of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] had a similar system of ''Governor's rule'', under its Section 92. The state's governor issued a proclamation, after obtaining the consent of the [[President of India]] allowing Governor's rule for | Prior to 2019, the [[Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir|constitution]] of the state of [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] had a similar system of ''Governor's rule'', under its Section 92. The state's governor issued a proclamation, after obtaining the consent of the [[President of India]] allowing Governor's rule for up to six months after which President's rule under Article 356 of the Constitution of India could be imposed. After the [[Indian revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status|revocation]] of [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|Article 370]], President's rule applies to Jammu and Kashmir under section 73 (since Article 356 of Constitution of India does not apply to union territories) of [[Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019]]. | ||
Following the 1994 landmark judgment in ''[[S. R. Bommai v. Union of India]]'', the [[Supreme Court of India]] restricted arbitrary impositions of President's rule. | Following the 1994 landmark judgment in ''[[S. R. Bommai v. Union of India]]'', the [[Supreme Court of India]] restricted arbitrary impositions of President's rule. | ||
[[Chhattisgarh]] and [[Telangana]] are the only states where the President's rule has | [[Chhattisgarh]] and [[Telangana]] are the only states where the President's rule has never been imposed so far.<ref name=":6">Das, Anjishnu (29 August 2023). [https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/13-years-in-jk-10-times-in-manipur-up-history-of-presidents-rule-8912688/ "13 years in J&K, 10 times in Manipur, UP: History of President's Rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122614/https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/13-years-in-jk-10-times-in-manipur-up-history-of-presidents-rule-8912688/ |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
==Imposition in state== | ==Imposition in state== | ||
In practice, President's rule has been imposed in a | In practice, President's rule has been imposed in a State under any one of the following different circumstances: | ||
* A state Assembly is unable to elect a leader as Chief Minister for a time prescribed by the Governor of that State, at the Will of Governor. | |||
* Breakdown of a coalition leading to the Chief Minister not having majority support in the Assembly; and the Chief minister fails/will definitely fail to prove otherwise, within a time prescribed by the Governor of that state. | |||
* Loss of majority in the Assembly due to a vote of no-confidence in the house. | |||
* Elections postponed for unavoidable reasons like war, epidemic, pandemic or natural disasters. | |||
* On the report of the Governor of the State that the State's constitutional machinery or legislature fails to abide by Constitutional norms. | |||
If approved by both Houses, President's rule can continue for 6 months. It can be extended for a maximum of 3 years with the approval of the Parliament done every 6 months; however in extreme rare cases it can be extended repeatedly if the [[Election Commission of India]] recommends that elections are not possible. If the [[Lok Sabha]] is dissolved during this time, the rule is valid for 30 days from the first sitting of the new Lok Sabha provided that this continuance has already been approved by [[Rajya Sabha]]. The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 introduced a new provision to put a restraint on the power of Parliament to extend the President's rule in a state. According to this provision, the president's rule can only be extended over a year, under the following conditions: | |||
If approved by both | |||
* There is already a national emergency throughout India, or in the whole or any part of the state. | * There is already a national emergency throughout India, or in the whole or any part of the state. | ||
* The [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] certifies that elections cannot be conducted in the state. | * The [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] certifies that elections cannot be conducted in the state. | ||
President's rule can be revoked at any time by the President and does not need Parliament's approval. | President's rule can be revoked at any time by the President and does not need Parliament's approval. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Article 356 is not applicable to Union territories, so there are many ways by which President's rule can be imposed in different Union territories with a Legislative Assembly. | Article 356 is not applicable to Union territories, so there are many ways by which President's rule can be imposed in different Union territories with a Legislative Assembly. | ||
=== Jammu and Kashmir=== | ===Jammu and Kashmir=== | ||
Until the [[Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir|revocation of | Until the [[Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir|revocation of special status]] and [[Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019|bifurcation]] into two Union territories, President's rule applied after the application of Governor's rule under the [[Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir|erstwhile state's constitution]] for 6 months. | ||
After the revocation and bifurcation, the reorganized | After the revocation and bifurcation, the reorganized union territory of Jammu and Kashmir is subject to the section 73 of the [[Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019]], which is used to impose President's rule as the Article 356 is not applicable to Union Territories. The provision states: | ||
{{ | {{blockquote|<b>73.</b> If the President, on receipt of a report from the Lieutenant Governor of Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, or otherwise, is satisfied,— | ||
''(a)'' that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory | ''(a)'' that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act | the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act | ||
for such period as he thinks fit and makes such incidental and consequential provisions as | for such period as he thinks fit and makes such incidental and consequential provisions as | ||
may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory of | may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the provisions of this Act.}} | ||
Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the provisions of this Act.}} | |||
=== Delhi === | === Delhi === | ||
In NCT of Delhi, President's rule is applied on the basis of Article 239AB of the Constitution of India (as the Article 356 is not applicable to Union Territories) which reads thus: | In NCT of Delhi, President's rule is applied on the basis of Article 239AB of the Constitution of India (as the Article 356 is not applicable to Union Territories) which reads thus: | ||
{{ | {{blockquote|<b>239AB.</b> – If the President, on receipt of a report from the Lieutenant Governor or otherwise, is satisfied— | ||
(a)that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the National Capital Territory cannot | (a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the National Capital Territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of article 239AA or of any law made in pursuance of | ||
be carried on in accordance with the provisions of article 239AA or of any law made in pursuance of | |||
that article; or | that article; or | ||
(b)that for the proper administration of the National Capital Territory it is necessary or expedient | (b) that for the proper administration of the National Capital Territory it is necessary or expedient | ||
so to do, | so to do, the President may by order suspend the operation of any provision of Article 239AA or of all or any of the | ||
provisions of any law made in pursuance of that article for such period and subject to such conditions as maybe specified in such law and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the National Capital Territory in accordance with the provisions of article 239 and article 239AA.}} | |||
the President may by order suspend the operation of any provision of Article 239AA or of all or any of the | |||
provisions of any law made in pursuance of that article for such period and subject to such conditions as | |||
maybe specified in such law and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him | |||
to be necessary or expedient for administering the National Capital Territory in accordance with the | |||
provisions of article 239 and article 239AA.}} | |||
===Puducherry=== | ===Puducherry=== | ||
In the | In the union territory of Puducherry, President's rule is applied on the basis of Article 51 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Ministry of Law and Justice|first=Legislative Department|url=https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1963-20.pdf|title=Government of Union Territories Act, 1963|publisher=Authority|year=1963|location=New Delhi|page=34|access-date=25 February 2021|archive-date=4 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220204034549/https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1963-20.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Which thus reads | ||
{{ | {{blockquote|<b>51. Provision in case of failure of constitutional machinery.</b> — If the President, on receipt of a report from the Administrator of the Union territory or otherwise, is satisfied,― | ||
(a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Act, or | (a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Act, or | ||
| Line 79: | Line 72: | ||
(b) that for the proper administration of the Union territory it is necessary or expedient so to do, the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act for such period as he thinks fit and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory in accordance with the provisions of article 239.}} | (b) that for the proper administration of the Union territory it is necessary or expedient so to do, the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act for such period as he thinks fit and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory in accordance with the provisions of article 239.}} | ||
== | ==Misuse and criticism== | ||
Article 356 gives wide powers to the Union government to assert its authority over a state if civil unrest occurs and the state government does not have the means to end it. Though the purpose of this article is to give more powers to the Union government to preserve the unity and integrity of the nation, it has often been misused by the ruling parties at the centre, who used it as a pretext to dissolve state governments ruled by political opponents.<ref>{{cite news |title=Limitations of Article 356 |url=http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/op/2003/05/06/stories/2003050600010200.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030919103858/http://hindu.com/thehindu/op/2003/05/06/stories/2003050600010200.htm |url-status=dead |newspaper=[[The Hindu]] |archive-date=2003-09-19 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Bhardwaj |first1=Ashutosh |last2=Sinha |first2=Amitabh |last3=Mohanty |first3=Debabrata |date=29 March 2016 |title=Over 100 blows old, Article 356 is a hammer that all govts love |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/over-100-blows-old-article-356-is-a-hammer-that-all-govts-love/ |access-date=4 May 2024 |work=[[Indian Express]] |archive-date=4 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240504231745/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/over-100-blows-old-article-356-is-a-hammer-that-all-govts-love/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Thus, it is seen by many as a threat to the [[Federation|federal]] state system. Since the adoption of the Indian constitution in 1950, the Union government has used this 134 times to dissolve elected state governments by imposing President's rule.<ref name=":6" /> | |||
The article was used for the first time in Punjab on 20 June 1951. It was | The article was used for the first time in [[Punjab, India|Punjab]] on 20 June 1951. It was next used in the state of [[Patiala and East Punjab States Union]] (PEPSU) in 1953, and then in 1959 to dismiss the [[First Namboodiripad ministry|Communist Party of India–led government]] in [[Kerala]] in the aftermath of [[Liberation Struggle (Kerala)|anti-communist protests]]. In the 1970s and 1980s, it was common for the Union government to dismiss state governments led by opposition parties.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sarkaria Commission Report – Chapter VI : Emergency Provisions |url=http://interstatecouncil.nic.in/Sarkaria/CHAPTERVI.pdf |access-date=28 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140820195906/http://interstatecouncil.nic.in/Sarkaria/CHAPTERVI.pdf |archive-date=20 August 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The [[Indira Gandhi]] regime and post-emergency [[Janata government|Janata Party]] were noted for this practice. Indira Gandhi's government between 1966 and 1977 is known to have imposed President's rule 39 times in different states.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Harriss |first1=John |author-link1=John Harriss |year=2010 |chapter=Political change, political structure, and the Indian state since Independence |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cpF8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA61 |editor-last1=Brass |editor-first1=Paul R. |editor-link1=Paul Brass |title=Routledge Handbook of South Asian Politics: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal |edition=ebook |publisher=Routledge |pages=55–66 |doi=10.4324/9780203878187 |isbn=978-0-203-87818-7 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240925223204/https://books.google.com/books?id=cpF8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA61#v=onepage&q&f=false |archive-date=25 September 2024 |access-date=2 May 2024 |via=Google Books |quote-page=61 |quote=...{{nbsp}}Article 356, authorizing "President's Rule," through which governments at the centre have regularly dissolved state governments{{nbsp}}... Indira Gandhi used this instrument 39 times between 1966 and 1977 }}.</ref> Similarly, the Janata Party which came to power after the emergency issued President's rule in 9 states which were ruled by Congress.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
The practice was limited only after the Supreme Court established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule in its ruling on the ''[[S. R. Bommai v. Union of India]]'' case in 1994. This landmark judgement has helped curtail the widespread abuse of Article 356. The judgement established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule. Subsequent pronouncements by the Supreme Court in Jharkhand and other states have further limited the scope for misuse of Article 356. Only since the early 2000s has the number of cases of imposition of President's rule has been drastically reduced. | The practice was limited only after the Supreme Court established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule in its ruling on the ''[[S. R. Bommai v. Union of India]]'' case in 1994. This landmark judgement has helped curtail the widespread abuse of Article 356. The judgement established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule. Subsequent pronouncements by the Supreme Court in Jharkhand and other states have further limited the scope for misuse of Article 356. Only since the early 2000s has the number of cases of imposition of President's rule has been drastically reduced.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Vishwanath |first=Apurva |date=12 December 2023 |title=What was the SR Bommai judgment, which the SC relied on in its Article 370 ruling? |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/what-was-the-bommai-judgment-which-the-sc-relied-on-in-its-article-370-ruling-9064090/ |url-access=subscription |access-date=4 May 2024 |work=[[Indian Express]] |archive-date=4 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240504221307/https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/what-was-the-bommai-judgment-which-the-sc-relied-on-in-its-article-370-ruling-9064090/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
Article 356 has always been the focal point of a wider debate of the [[Federalism in India|federal structure]] of government in Indian polity.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://lawmin.nic.in/ncrwc/finalreport/v2b2-5.htm |title=National Commission to Review the Working of the Article 356 of the constitution |year=2001 |access-date=29 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150509030437/http://lawmin.nic.in/ncrwc/finalreport/v2b2-5.htm |archive-date=9 May 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> During debates in the [[Constituent Assembly of India]] regarding [[emergency provisions of the Constitution of India]], [[B. R. Ambedkar]] argued for their inclusion under the assumption "that such articles will never be called into operation and that they would remain a [[Dead letter law|dead letter]]".<ref>{{cite web |title=Constituent Assembly Debates, Volume 9: 04 August 1949 |script-title= |title-link= |url=https://www.constitutionofindia.net/debates/04-aug-1949/ |website=ConstitutionofIndia.net |publication-place=Bengaluru |publisher=Centre for Law and Policy Research |at=Articles 188, 277-A and 278-contd., sec. 9.111.49 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240504233106/https://www.constitutionofindia.net/debates/04-aug-1949/ |archive-date=4 May 2024 |access-date=22 June 2025 }}</ref> The [[Sarkaria Commission]] Report on Centre-State Relations 1983 has recommended that Article 356 must be used "very sparingly, in extreme cases, as a measure of last resort, when all the other alternatives fail to prevent or rectify a breakdown of Constitutional machinery in the state".<ref>{{cite web |title=Sarkaria Commission Report – Chapter VI: Emergency Provisions |url=http://interstatecouncil.nic.in/Sarkaria/CHAPTERVI.pdf |access-date=28 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140820195906/http://interstatecouncil.nic.in/Sarkaria/CHAPTERVI.pdf |archive-date=20 August 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
==List of instances== | ==List of instances== | ||
{{ | {{legend|#9BDDFF|text={{double dagger}}|Denotes currently imposed President rule|border=black}} | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
! | |+List of instances of President's rule being applied | ||
! | ! scope=row | State | ||
! | ! scope=row | Term | ||
! | ! scope=row | Date of imposition | ||
! | ! scope=row | Date of revocation | ||
! Reason(s) to impose the President's rule | ! scope=row | Duration | ||
! scope=row | Reason(s) to impose the President's rule | |||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="2"| [[Andhra Pradesh]] | | rowspan="2"| [[Andhra Pradesh]] | ||
| Line 104: | Line 97: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|10 December 1973}} | | {{Date table sorting|10 December 1973}} | ||
| {{ayd|18 January 1976|10 December 1976}} | | {{ayd|18 January 1976|10 December 1976}} | ||
| Breakdown of law & order due to [[1972 Jai Andhra movement|Jai Andhra Agitation]], in [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]]'s tenure. | | Breakdown of law & order due to [[1972 Jai Andhra movement|Jai Andhra Agitation]], in CM [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]]'s tenure.<ref>Narayana Rao, K. V. (August 1977). "Mulki agitation in the Telangana and Andhra regions". ''[https://core.ac.uk/download/18321084.pdf Internal migration policies in an Indian state: A study of the Mulki rules in Hyderabad and Andhra] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124114/https://core.ac.uk/download/18321084.pdf |date=2 May 2024 }}'' (PDF). Cambridge, Massachusetts: [[MIT Center for International Studies]]. p. 63. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|1 March 2014}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|8 June 2014}} | | {{Date table sorting|8 June 2014}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|1 March 2014|8 June 2014}} | ||
| Political impasse following the resignation of | | Political impasse following the resignation of CM [[Kiran Kumar Reddy]] and several other congress party legislators from the Government as well as the Party, in protest against Indian Parliament passing [[Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Bill]] to bifurcate united Andhra Pradesh and create a separate [[Telangana]] state.<ref>{{cite web |title=President's Rule imposed in Andhra Pradesh under Article 356 of Constitution |url=http://news.biharprabha.com/2014/02/presidents-rule-imposed-in-andhra-pradesh-under-article-356-of-constitution/ |work=IANS |publisher=news.biharprabha.com |access-date=28 February 2014 |archive-date=18 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140418081617/http://news.biharprabha.com/2014/02/presidents-rule-imposed-in-andhra-pradesh-under-article-356-of-constitution/ |url-status=live }}</ref> President's rule revoked from Telangana areas on 2 June 2014 and bifurcated Andhra Pradesh areas on 8 June 2014.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Andhra-Pradesh-mired-in-President-rule-imbroglio/articleshow/33933171.cms |title=Andhra Pradesh mired in President rule imbroglio |newspaper=The Times of India |date=19 April 2014 |access-date=21 September 2014 |archive-date=6 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140706013450/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Andhra-Pradesh-mired-in-President-rule-imbroglio/articleshow/33933171.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> President rule reimposed unlawfully by the President after the two months time limit without taking approval of the Parliament under [[s:Constitution of India/Part XVIII|Article 356]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2014/159233.pdf |title=Re-proclamation of President rule in Andhra Pradesh |year=2014 |access-date=17 August 2014 |archive-date=24 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140924041027/http://www.egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2014/159233.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Andhra-Pradesh-mired-in-President-rule-imbroglio/articleshow/33933171.cms |title=Andhra Pradesh mired in President rule imbroglio |access-date=21 September 2014 |work=The Times of India |archive-date=6 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140706013450/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Andhra-Pradesh-mired-in-President-rule-imbroglio/articleshow/33933171.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| [[Andhra State]] | | [[Andhra State]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|15 November 1954}} | | {{Date table sorting|15 November 1954}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|28 March 1955}} | ||
| {{ayd|15 November 1954| | | {{ayd|15 November 1954|28 March 1955}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=LmJlAAAAIBAJ&pg=PA7&article_id=1495,3303156 "When Centre stepped in"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122617/https://books.google.co.in/books?id=LmJlAAAAIBAJ&pg=PA7&article_id=1495,3303156&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiPn8ChqOOFAxXXfWwGHarDDRQQ6AF6BAgKEAM#v=onepage&q&f=false |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 17 March 1970. p. 7. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref name=":0">Dua, Bhagwan D. (Spring 1977). ''[https://archive.org/details/Dua1977/mode/2up?view=theater Presidential rule in India: A study in crisis politics]'' (PhD thesis). [[University of Alberta]]. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref>{{Rp|pages=127–133}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="2"| [[Arunachal Pradesh]] | | rowspan="2"| [[Arunachal Pradesh]] | ||
| Line 124: | Line 117: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|18 January 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|18 January 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|3 November 1979|18 January 1980}} | | {{ayd|3 November 1979|18 January 1980}} | ||
| Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment during Janata party rule at the centre. | | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment during Janata party rule at the centre.<ref>Chawla, Prabhu (30 November 1979). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19791130-presidents-rule-brings-to-an-end-political-melodrama-in-arunachal-pradesh-822394-2014-02-22 "President's rule brings to an end political melodrama in Arunachal Pradesh"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124134/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19791130-presidents-rule-brings-to-an-end-political-melodrama-in-arunachal-pradesh-822394-2014-02-22 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 130: | Line 123: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|19 February 2016}} | | {{Date table sorting|19 February 2016}} | ||
| 26 days | | 26 days | ||
| 21 Congress MLAs joined hands with 11 of the BJP and two Independents, making the | | 21 Congress MLAs joined hands with 11 of the [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] and two Independents, making the contemporary government a minority.<ref>{{cite web |title=It's against Constitution: Politicians react to Prez rule in Arunachal |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/it-s-against-constitution-politicians-react-to-prez-rule-in-arunachal/story-rvOfvxYX8A3r7P60hqQGDI.html |work=Hindustan Times |date=25 January 2016 |access-date=25 January 2016 |archive-date=26 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160126040716/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/it-s-against-constitution-politicians-react-to-prez-rule-in-arunachal/story-rvOfvxYX8A3r7P60hqQGDI.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Supreme Court declared the imposition of president rule as [[ultra vires]] and reinstated the dismissed Congress led government in the state. In a landmark judgement, it found fault with the unconstitutional role played by the Governor by interfering in the activities of legislatures and speaker of the Vidhan Sabha<ref>{{cite web |title=After Arunachal Pradesh debacle, PM Modi must abolish post of governor |date=14 July 2016 |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/after-arunachal-pradesh-debacle-modi-must-abolish-post-of-governor-2892642.html |access-date=15 July 2016 |archive-date=17 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160717094634/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/after-arunachal-pradesh-debacle-modi-must-abolish-post-of-governor-2892642.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="4"| [[Assam]] | | rowspan="4"| [[Assam]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|12 December 1979}} | | {{Date table sorting|12 December 1979}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|6 December 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|12 December 1979| | | {{ayd|12 December 1979|6 December 1980}} | ||
| 'Assam Agitation' against illegal foreign nationals staying in Assam started to take roots under the leadership of the All Assam | | '[[Assam Movement|Assam Agitation]]' against illegal foreign nationals staying in Assam started to take roots under the leadership of the [[All Assam Students' Union]] (AASU). The violence fuelled by [[United Liberation Front of Asom]] (ULFA) resulted in breakdown of law and order.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Baruah |first1=Sanjib |author-link1=Sanjib Baruah |date=November 1986 |title=Immigration, Ethnic Conflict, and Political Turmoil—Assam, 1979–1985 |journal=[[Asian Survey]] |volume=26 |issue=11 |pages=1184–1206 |doi=10.2307/2644315 |jstor=2644315 }}</ref>{{rp|p=1193}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Darnell |first1=Alfred T. |last2=Parikh |first2=Sunita |date=July 1988 |title=Religion, ethnicity, and the role of the state: Explaining conflict in Assam |journal=[[Ethnic and Racial Studies]] |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=263–281 |doi=10.1080/01419870.1988.9993604 }}</ref>{{rp|p=274}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 143: | Line 136: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|13 January 1982}} | | {{Date table sorting|13 January 1982}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 June 1981|13 January 1982}} | | {{ayd|30 June 1981|13 January 1982}} | ||
| Congress (I) government led by Anwara Taimur representing immigrant minorities collapsed following intensification of 'Assam Agitation' against illegal foreign national staying in Assam. | | Congress (I) government led by [[Anwara Taimur]] representing immigrant minorities collapsed following intensification of 'Assam Agitation' against illegal foreign national staying in Assam.<ref>Sen, Sumanta (31 July 1981). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/nation/story/19810731-assam-set-for-another-spell-of-political-uncertainty-after-fall-of-congressi-ministry-773104-2013-11-15 "Assam set for another spell of political uncertainty after fall of Congress(I) ministry"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613063648/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/nation/story/19810731-assam-set-for-another-spell-of-political-uncertainty-after-fall-of-congressi-ministry-773104-2013-11-15 |date=13 June 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 149: | Line 142: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|27 February 1983}} | | {{Date table sorting|27 February 1983}} | ||
| {{ayd|19 March 1982|27 February 1983}} | | {{ayd|19 March 1982|27 February 1983}} | ||
| Congress (I) government led by Kesab Gogoi representing ethnic Asom people collapsed following continued violence in Assam. | | Congress (I) government led by [[Kesab Chandra Gogoi|Kesab Gogoi]] representing ethnic Asom people collapsed following continued violence in Assam.<ref>Sen, Sumanta (15 April 1982). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19820415-assam-congressi-ministry-led-by-keshab-gogoi-falls-presidents-rule-to-return-771658-2013-10-16 "Assam: Congress(I) ministry led by Keshab Gogoi falls, President's Rule to return"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502224620/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19820415-assam-congressi-ministry-led-by-keshab-gogoi-falls-presidents-rule-to-return-771658-2013-10-16 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 155: | Line 148: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|30 June 1991}} | | {{Date table sorting|30 June 1991}} | ||
| {{ayd|28 November 1990|30 June 1991}} | | {{ayd|28 November 1990|30 June 1991}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of AGP CM Prafulla Mahanta enjoying majority support in Assembly. The dismissal was triggered apparently by the threat to internal security due to banned organisation ULFA's activities. During the president's rule, Operation Bajrang was launched to flush out ULFA militants. | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Asom Gana Parishad|AGP]] CM [[Prafulla Kumar Mahanta|Prafulla Mahanta]] enjoying majority support in Assembly. The dismissal was triggered apparently by the threat to internal security due to banned organisation ULFA's activities.<ref>Sengupta, Uttam (15 December 1990). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19901215-assam-crisis-puts-government-in-catch-22-situation-813400-1990-12-14 "Assam crisis puts government in catch-22 situation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503084742/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19901215-assam-crisis-puts-government-in-catch-22-situation-813400-1990-12-14 |date=3 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> During the president's rule, [[Operation Bajrang]] was launched to flush out ULFA militants.<ref>Ahmed, Farzand (31 March 1991). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19910331-three-months-after-army-moved-in-operation-bajrang-makes-little-headway-and-ulfa-remains-potent-force-814242-1991-03-30 "Three months after army moved in, Operation Bajrang makes little headway and ULFA remains potent force"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502175328/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19910331-three-months-after-army-moved-in-operation-bajrang-makes-little-headway-and-ulfa-remains-potent-force-814242-1991-03-30 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="8"| [[Bihar]] | | rowspan="8"| [[Bihar]] | ||
| Line 162: | Line 155: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|26 February 1969}} | | {{Date table sorting|26 February 1969}} | ||
| {{ayd|29 June 1968|26 February 1969}} | | {{ayd|29 June 1968|26 February 1969}} | ||
| Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment. | | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment.<ref name=":1">Siwach, J. R. (1979). ''[http://14.139.58.199:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/317 Politics of President's Rule in India]'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613063656/http://14.139.58.199:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/317 |date=13 June 2024 }}. Simla: [[Indian Institute of Advanced Study]]. [[OCLC (identifier)|OCLC]] [https://search.worldcat.org/title/7583232 7583232]. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref>{{Rp|pages=116–117}}<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=300–301}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 168: | Line 161: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|16 February 1970}} | | {{Date table sorting|16 February 1970}} | ||
| {{ayd|4 July 1969|16 February 1970}} | | {{ayd|4 July 1969|16 February 1970}} | ||
| Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment due to split in ruling Congress party | | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment due to split in ruling Congress party<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=123–125}}<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=321–326}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 174: | Line 167: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|19 March 1972}} | | {{Date table sorting|19 March 1972}} | ||
| {{ayd|9 January 1972|19 March 1972}} | | {{ayd|9 January 1972|19 March 1972}} | ||
| Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment. | | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=129–130}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 180: | Line 173: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|24 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|24 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 April 1977|24 June 1977}} | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|24 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Jagannath Mishra enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Jagannath Mishra]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2">Borders, William (1 May 1977). [https://www.nytimes.com/1977/05/01/archives/constitutional-conflict-ends-in-india-as-acting-president-accepts.html "Constitutional Conflict Ends in India as Acting President Accepts Order Dissolving Nine State Legislatures"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122616/https://www.nytimes.com/1977/05/01/archives/constitutional-conflict-ends-in-india-as-acting-president-accepts.html |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[New York Times]]''. p. 4. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref name=":3">{{cite journal |last1=Tummala |first1=Krishna K. |date=October 1996 |title=The Indian Union and Emergency Powers |journal=International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique |volume=17 |issue=4, New Trends in Federalism / Les nouvelles formes du fédéralisme |pages=373–384 |doi=10.1177/019251296017004003 |jstor=1601275 }}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| Line 186: | Line 179: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|8 June 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|8 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|17 February 1980|8 June 1980}} | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|8 June 1980}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Ram Sundar Das enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Ram Sundar Das]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":4">Louis, Arul B.; Chawla, Prabhu (15 March 1980). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19800315-pm-indira-gandhi-dismisses-governments-in-nine-states-looks-to-put-congress-in-power-806503-2014-02-06 "PM Indira Gandhi dismisses governments in nine states, looks to put Congress in power"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122626/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19800315-pm-indira-gandhi-dismisses-governments-in-nine-states-looks-to-put-congress-in-power-806503-2014-02-06 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|28 March 1995}} | | {{Date table sorting|28 March 1995}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|4 April 1995}} | ||
| {{ayd|28 March 1995| | | {{ayd|28 March 1995|4 April 1995}} | ||
| President's rule imposed for a brief period of one week to facilitate passage of vote on account (to permit day-to-day government expenses in Bihar) by Parliament while awaiting the results of Assembly elections held during the Chief Ministership of Laloo Prasad. | | President's rule imposed for a brief period of one week to facilitate passage of vote on account (to permit day-to-day government expenses in Bihar) by Parliament while awaiting the results of Assembly elections held during the Chief Ministership of [[Lalu Prasad Yadav|Lalu Prasad]].<ref>Ahmed, Farzand (15 April 1995). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19950415-stand-off-between-t-n-seshan-and-laloo-prasad-yadav-leaves-trail-of-woes-for-common-man-807148-1995-04-14 "Stand-off between T. N. Seshan and Laloo Prasad Yadav leaves trail of woes for common man"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503085736/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19950415-stand-off-between-t-n-seshan-and-laloo-prasad-yadav-leaves-trail-of-woes-for-common-man-807148-1995-04-14 |date=3 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|12 February 1999}} | | {{Date table sorting|12 February 1999}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|8 March 1999}} | ||
| {{ayd|12 February 1999| | | {{ayd|12 February 1999|8 March 1999}} | ||
| Breakdown of law and order, killings of 11 Dalits at Narayanpur. The Vajpayee Government, revoked the president's rule within 26 days since the coalition did not have a majority in the Rajya Sabha. | | Breakdown of law and order, killings of 11 Dalits at Narayanpur. The Vajpayee Government, revoked the president's rule within 26 days since the coalition did not have a majority in the Rajya Sabha.<ref>Zarhani, Seyedhossein (December 2015). ''[https://core.ac.uk/download/79191805.pdf Dynamics of Governance and Development in India: A Comparative Study on Andhra Pradesh and Bihar after 1990]'' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124119/https://core.ac.uk/download/79191805.pdf |date=2 May 2024 }} (PDF) (PhD thesis). Heidelberg University. pp. 186–187. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| Line 204: | Line 197: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|24 November 2005}} | | {{Date table sorting|24 November 2005}} | ||
| {{ayd|7 March 2005|24 November 2005}} | | {{ayd|7 March 2005|24 November 2005}} | ||
| Indecisive outcome of elections. In a landmark judgement, Supreme Court ruled that the imposition of the president's rule without giving the chance to the elected legislatures to form new government is unconstitutional and [[mala fide]] act by the president.<ref>{{cite web|title=Rameshwar Prasad And Ors vs Union Of India And Anr on 24 January, 2006|url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1885130/|access-date=2 July 2015}}</ref> | | Indecisive outcome of elections. In a landmark judgement, Supreme Court ruled that the imposition of the president's rule without giving the chance to the elected legislatures to form new government is unconstitutional and [[mala fide]] act by the president.<ref>{{cite web|title=Rameshwar Prasad And Ors vs Union Of India And Anr on 24 January, 2006|url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1885130/|access-date=2 July 2015|archive-date=16 October 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101016074238/http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1885130/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| [[Delhi]] | | [[Delhi]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|16 February 2014}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|14 February 2015}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|16 February 2014|14 February 2015}} | ||
| | Arvind Kejriwal resigned as Chief Minister after failing to table the Jan Lokpal Bill in the Delhi Assembly. | | | [[Arvind Kejriwal]] resigned as Chief Minister after failing to table the [[Jan Lokpal Bill]] in the [[Delhi Legislative Assembly|Delhi Assembly]].<ref>Kumar, Devesh (17 February 2014). [https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/presidents-rule-imposed-in-delhi-after-arvind-kejriwals-resignation-551077 "President's Rule imposed in Delhi after Arvind Kejriwal's resignation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122619/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/presidents-rule-imposed-in-delhi-after-arvind-kejriwals-resignation-551077 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[NDTV]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="3" |[[Goa]] | |||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|14 December 1990}} | | {{Date table sorting|14 December 1990}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|25 January 1991}} | | {{Date table sorting|25 January 1991}} | ||
| {{ayd|14 December 1990|25 January 1991}} | | {{ayd|14 December 1990|25 January 1991}} | ||
| C.M. resigned consequent upon his disqualification by High Court – No other Government found viable | | C.M. resigned consequent upon his disqualification by High Court – No other Government found viable.<ref>Rahman, M. (15 January 1991). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19910115-polls-only-solution-for-confused-goa-assembly-813887-1991-01-14 "Polls only solution for confused Goa assembly"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124132/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19910115-polls-only-solution-for-confused-goa-assembly-813887-1991-01-14 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|10 February 1999}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|9 June 1999}} | | {{Date table sorting|9 June 1999}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|10 February 1999|9 June 1999}} | ||
| Loss of majority and no alternate claimant to form next government | | Loss of majority and no alternate claimant to form next government.<ref>Abreu, Robin (22 February 1999). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/states/story/19990222-credible-rule-becomes-a-thing-of-the-past-in-goa-780220-1999-02-21 "Credible rule becomes a thing of the past in Goa"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122637/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/states/story/19990222-credible-rule-becomes-a-thing-of-the-past-in-goa-780220-1999-02-21 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|4 March 2005}} | | {{Date table sorting|4 March 2005}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|7 June 2005}} | | {{Date table sorting|7 June 2005}} | ||
| {{ayd|4 March 2005|7 June 2005}} | | {{ayd|4 March 2005|7 June 2005}} | ||
| Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Pratap Sinh Rane | | Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM [[Pratapsingh Rane|Pratap Sinh Rane]].<ref>Sharma, Ravi (1 July 2005). [https://frontline.thehindu.com/politics/article30205252.ece "Another government in Goa"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122619/https://frontline.thehindu.com/politics/article30205252.ece |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Frontline (magazine)|Frontline]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/goa-cong-accept-presidents-rule/articleshow/1042090.cms "Goa Cong accept President's Rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122618/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/goa-cong-accept-presidents-rule/articleshow/1042090.cms |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Times of India]]''. 5 March 2005. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |||
| rowspan="2" |[[Goa, Daman and Diu]] | |||
|1 | |||
| {{Date table sorting|3 December 1966}} | |||
| {{Date table sorting|5 April 1967}} | |||
| {{ayd|3 December 1966|5 April 1967}} | |||
|The Union Territory of Goa's Assembly was dissolved to conduct an opinion poll to determine whether Goa should be merged with Maharashtra.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rubinoff |first1=Arthur G. |date=May 1992 |title=Goa's Attainment of Statehood |journal=[[Asian Survey]] |volume=32 |issue=5 |pages=471–487 |doi=10.2307/2644978 |jstor=2644978 }}</ref>{{rp|pp=476–477}} | |||
|-style="text-align:center" | |||
|2 | |||
| {{Date table sorting|27 April 1979}} | |||
| {{Date table sorting|16 January 1980}} | |||
| {{ayd|27 April 1979|16 January 1980}} | |||
|Loss of majority following split in the ruling [[Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party|MGP]] Party.<ref>Panchal, Chinu (31 May 1979). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19790531-shashikala-kakodkar-toppled-from-chief-ministership-of-goa-by-babu-naik-822064-2014-03-12 "Shashikala Kakodkar toppled from chief ministership of Goa by Babu Naik"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124133/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19790531-shashikala-kakodkar-toppled-from-chief-ministership-of-goa-by-babu-naik-822064-2014-03-12 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | |||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="5"| [[Gujarat]] | | rowspan="5"| [[Gujarat]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|13 May 1971}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 March 1972}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 March 1972}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|13 May 1971|17 March 1972}} | ||
| Loss of majority following vertical split in Congress during 1969 presidential election | | Loss of majority following vertical split in Congress during [[1969 Indian presidential election|1969 presidential election]].<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=138–140}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 255: | Line 249: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|18 June 1975}} | | {{Date table sorting|18 June 1975}} | ||
| {{ayd|9 February 1974|18 June 1975}} | | {{ayd|9 February 1974|18 June 1975}} | ||
| Chimanbhai Patel led Congress government resigned due to [[Navnirman Movement]] Anti-Corruption protests. The protesters forced MLA's resignations, forcing dissolution of assembly. | | [[Chimanbhai Patel]] led Congress government resigned due to [[Navnirman Movement]] Anti-Corruption protests. The protesters forced MLA's resignations, forcing dissolution of assembly.<ref>[[Ramachandra Guha|Guha, Ramachandra]] (2007). "The Rivals". ''[https://archive.org/details/indiaaftergandhi0000rama_g6k5/page/476/mode/2up?view=theater India after Gandhi: The history of the world's largest democracy]''. New York: [[HarperCollins]]. p. 476. {{ISBN|978-0-230-01654-5}}. {{OCLC|77012193}}. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 261: | Line 255: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|24 December 1976}} | | {{Date table sorting|24 December 1976}} | ||
| {{ayd|12 March 1976|24 December 1976}} | | {{ayd|12 March 1976|24 December 1976}} | ||
| "Non-Passage" of budget leading to collapse of government | | "Non-Passage" of budget leading to collapse of government.<ref>[https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19760331-janta-front-govt-in-gujarat-suffers-a-two-vote-defeat-819106-2015-04-01 "Janta Front govt in Gujarat suffers a two vote defeat"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122617/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19760331-janta-front-govt-in-gujarat-suffers-a-two-vote-defeat-819106-2015-04-01 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. 31 March 1976. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|7 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|17 February 1980| | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|7 June 1980}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Babubhai J Patel enjoying majority support in the Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Babubhai J. Patel|Babubhai J Patel]] enjoying majority support in the Assembly<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| Line 273: | Line 267: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|23 October 1996}} | | {{Date table sorting|23 October 1996}} | ||
| {{ayd|19 September 1996|23 October 1996}} | | {{ayd|19 September 1996|23 October 1996}} | ||
| Government dismissed following a controversial confidence vote. The Assembly was placed in suspended animation, which led to subsequent installation of Vaghela government, supported by Congress | | Government dismissed following a controversial confidence vote. The Assembly was placed in suspended animation, which led to subsequent installation of [[Shankersinh Vaghela|Vaghela]] government, supported by Congress.<ref>[https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30158873.ece "Going by the book, read anew, but large issues remain"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613063649/https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30158873.ece |date=13 June 2024 }}. ''[[Frontline (magazine)|Frontline]]''. 1 November 1997. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="3"| [[Haryana]] | | rowspan="3"| [[Haryana]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|2 November 1967}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|21 May 1968}} | ||
| {{ayd|21 November 1967| | | {{ayd|21 November 1967|21 May 1968}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of having a tenuous majority. | | Government [[Aaya Ram Gaya Ram|dismissed in spite of having a tenuous majority]].<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=153-155}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 286: | Line 280: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|21 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|21 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 April 1977|21 June 1977}} | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|21 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of B D Gupta enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Banarsi Das Gupta|B D Gupta]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|6 April 1991}} | | {{Date table sorting|6 April 1991}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|23 | | {{Date table sorting|23 June 1991}} | ||
| {{ayd|6 April 1991|23 | | {{ayd|6 April 1991|23 June 1991}} | ||
| Rebellion in the ruling party | | Rebellion in the ruling party.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=eX1lAAAAIBAJ&sjid=uJ0NAAAAIBAJ&pg=1026%2C2190952 "Haryana placed under President's rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122614/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=eX1lAAAAIBAJ&sjid=uJ0NAAAAIBAJ&pg=1026,2190952 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 7 April 1991. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="2"| [[Himachal Pradesh]] | | rowspan="2"| [[Himachal Pradesh]] | ||
| Line 299: | Line 293: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|22 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|22 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 April 1977|22 June 1977}} | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|22 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Thakur Ram Lal enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Thakur Ram Lal]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 305: | Line 299: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|3 December 1993}} | | {{Date table sorting|3 December 1993}} | ||
| {{ayd|15 December 1992|3 December 1993}} | | {{ayd|15 December 1992|3 December 1993}} | ||
| Government dismissed in the aftermath of the destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan in Uttar Pradesh. | | Government dismissed in the aftermath of the [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan]] in Uttar Pradesh.<ref name=":5">[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=DH9lAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vp0NAAAAIBAJ&pg=2290%2C1141578 "Three BJP govts dismissed"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122614/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=DH9lAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vp0NAAAAIBAJ&pg=2290,1141578 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 16 December 1992. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="7" | [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]]<br /> (State) | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|27 March 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|9 July 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|9 July 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|27 March 1977|9 July 1977}} | ||
| Sheikh Abdullah led National Conference government bowed out after being reduced to a minority following withdrawal of support by the Congress Party | | [[Sheikh Abdullah]] led [[Jammu & Kashmir National Conference|National Conference]] government bowed out after being reduced to a minority following withdrawal of support by the Congress Party.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=431-432}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|7 March 1986}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|6 November 1986}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|7 March 1986|6 November 1986}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref>Dubey, Suman (31 March 1986). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19860331-congressi-withdraws-support-from-gm-shah-govt-paves-way-for-governors-rule-in-j-k-800732-1986-03-30 "Congress(I) withdraws support from G.M. Shah govt, paves way for governor's rule in J&K"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502175315/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19860331-congressi-withdraws-support-from-gm-shah-govt-paves-way-for-governors-rule-in-j-k-800732-1986-03-30 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 324: | Line 318: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|9 October 1996}} | | {{Date table sorting|9 October 1996}} | ||
| {{ayd|19 January 1990|9 October 1996}} | | {{ayd|19 January 1990|9 October 1996}} | ||
| | | Increased [[Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir|Militancy]], [[Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus]] & breakdown of law & order<ref>{{Cite web |title=Jammu & Kashmir under Governor's rule for eighth time |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/jammu-kashmir-under-governor-s-rule-for-eighth-time-1265259-2018-06-20 |access-date=2023-08-11 |website=India Today |date=20 June 2018 |language=en |archive-date=11 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230811143423/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/jammu-kashmir-under-governor-s-rule-for-eighth-time-1265259-2018-06-20 |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
|- style="text-align:center" | |||
|- | |||
|-style="text-align:center" | |||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|10 July 2008}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|5 January 2009}} | | {{Date table sorting|5 January 2009}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|10 July 2008|5 January 2009}} | ||
| Loss of majority following collapse of coalition. CM Gulam Nabi Azad's decision to transfer land for Amarnath pilgrimage led to PDP pulling out of coalition Govt. | | Loss of majority following collapse of coalition. CM [[Ghulam Nabi Azad|Gulam Nabi Azad]]'s decision to [[Amarnath land transfer controversy|transfer land for Amarnath pilgrimage]] led to [[Peoples Democratic Party (India)|PDP]] pulling out of coalition Govt.<ref>Ganguly, Sumit (7 May 2009). "Slow learning: lessons from India's counterinsurgency operations in Kashmir". In Fidler, David P.; Ganguly, Sumit (eds.). [https://books.google.com/books?id=HKl5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA87 ''India and Counterinsurgency: Lessons Learned'']. New York: [[Taylor & Francis]]. p. 87. {{ISBN|978-1-134-00809-4}}. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
| Line 343: | Line 330: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|1 March 2015}} | | {{Date table sorting|1 March 2015}} | ||
| {{ayd|9 January 2015|1 March 2015}} | | {{ayd|9 January 2015|1 March 2015}} | ||
| Failure of Government formation after fractured verdict in Assembly elections. BJP & PDP reached an understanding to form an alliance to form Government in J&K.<ref>{{cite | | Failure of Government formation after fractured verdict in Assembly elections. BJP & PDP reached an understanding to form an alliance to form Government in J&K.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/governors-rule-imposed-in-jammu-and-kashmir/article6771894.ece|title=Governor's rule in J&K|first=Vinay|last=Kumar|newspaper=The Hindu |date=9 January 2015|access-date=5 April 2018|via=www.thehindu.com|archive-date=5 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200605091508/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/governors-rule-imposed-in-jammu-and-kashmir/article6771894.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
| Line 349: | Line 336: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|4 April 2016}} | | {{Date table sorting|4 April 2016}} | ||
| {{ayd|8 January 2016|4 April 2016 }} | | {{ayd|8 January 2016|4 April 2016 }} | ||
| Death of chief minister [[Mufti Mohammad Sayeed]] | | Death of chief minister [[Mufti Mohammad Sayeed]].<ref>Ashiq, Peerzada (1 April 2016). [https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/Jammu-and-Kashmir-political-situation-Mehbooba-to-be-sworn-in-as-JampK%E2%80%99s-first-woman-CM-on-April-4/article60333385.ece "Mehbooba to be sworn in as J&K's first woman CM on April 4"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122627/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/Jammu-and-Kashmir-political-situation-Mehbooba-to-be-sworn-in-as-JampK%E2%80%99s-first-woman-CM-on-April-4/article60333385.ece |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[The Hindu]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| Line 355: | Line 342: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|30 October 2019}} | | {{Date table sorting|30 October 2019}} | ||
|{{ayd|19 June 2018|30 October 2019}} | |{{ayd|19 June 2018|30 October 2019}} | ||
|Resignation of the Chief Minister following loss of coalition partner.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-pulls-out-of-alliance-with-pdp-in-jammu-and-kashmir/articleshow/64646733.cms|title=Mehbooba Mufti resigns after BJP pulls out of alliance with PDP in Jammu and Kashmir | |Resignation of the Chief Minister following loss of coalition partner.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-pulls-out-of-alliance-with-pdp-in-jammu-and-kashmir/articleshow/64646733.cms|title=Mehbooba Mufti resigns after BJP pulls out of alliance with PDP in Jammu and Kashmir |work=The Times of India|access-date=2018-06-19|archive-date=9 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109012633/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-pulls-out-of-alliance-with-pdp-in-jammu-and-kashmir/articleshow/64646733.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> On 31 October 2019, Jammu and Kashmir state was split into two union territories, UT of Jammu and Kashmir and UT of Ladakh. | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| [[Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)|Jammu and Kashmir]]<br />(Union Territory) | | [[Jammu and Kashmir (union territory)|Jammu and Kashmir]]<br />(Union Territory) | ||
| 1 | |||
| {{Date table sorting|31 October 2019}} | |||
| | | {{Date table sorting|13 October 2024}} | ||
| {{ayd|31 October 2019|13 October 2024}} | |||
| | | Imposed under section 73 of [[Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019]] (Article 356 does not apply to Union Territories) | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="3"| [[Jharkhand]] | | rowspan="3"| [[Jharkhand]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|19 January 2009}} | | {{Date table sorting|19 January 2009}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|30 December 2009}} | ||
| {{ayd|19 January 2009| | | {{ayd|19 January 2009|30 December 2009}} | ||
| | | Political instability due to CM [[Shibu Soren]]'s resignation following defeat in Tamar bypolls.<ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/presidents-rule-imposed-in-jharkhand/articleshow/4002015.cms?from=mdr "President's rule imposed in Jharkhand"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502201244/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/presidents-rule-imposed-in-jharkhand/articleshow/4002015.cms?from=mdr |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[The Economic Times]]''. 19 January 2009. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 375: | Line 362: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|11 September 2010}} | | {{Date table sorting|11 September 2010}} | ||
| {{ayd|1 June 2010|11 September 2010}} | | {{ayd|1 June 2010|11 September 2010}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref>[https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Presidents-rule-in-Jharkhand/article16240271.ece "President's rule in Jharkhand"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613063656/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Presidents-rule-in-Jharkhand/article16240271.ece |date=13 June 2024 }}. ''[[The Hindu]]''. 1 June 2010. Retrieved 1 June 2010.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|18 January 2013}} | | {{Date table sorting|18 January 2013}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|13 July 2013}} | ||
| {{ayd|18 January 2013| | | {{ayd|18 January 2013|13 July 2013}} | ||
| Loss of majority BJP's ruling coalition partner JMM withdrew its support to the government pushing it into a minority. Chief Minister [[Arjun Munda]] resigned and sought dissolution of the state Assembly.<ref>{{cite news|agency=Press Trust of India|title=Jharkhand put under President's rule again|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Jharkhand/President-s-rule-imposed-in-Jharkhand/Article1-993008.aspx|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118182209/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Jharkhand/President-s-rule-imposed-in-Jharkhand/Article1-993008.aspx|url-status=dead|archive-date=18 January 2013|access-date=18 January 2013|newspaper=Hindustan Times|date=18 January 2013}}</ref> | | Loss of majority BJP's ruling coalition partner [[Jharkhand Mukti Morcha|JMM]] withdrew its support to the government pushing it into a minority. Chief Minister [[Arjun Munda]] resigned and sought dissolution of the state Assembly.<ref>{{cite news|agency=Press Trust of India|title=Jharkhand put under President's rule again|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Jharkhand/President-s-rule-imposed-in-Jharkhand/Article1-993008.aspx|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118182209/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Jharkhand/President-s-rule-imposed-in-Jharkhand/Article1-993008.aspx|url-status=dead|archive-date=18 January 2013|access-date=18 January 2013|newspaper=Hindustan Times|date=18 January 2013}}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="6" <span class="anchor" id="Karnataka"></span> | [[Karnataka]] | | rowspan="6" <span class="anchor" id="Karnataka"></span> | [[Karnataka]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|27 March 1971}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|20 March 1972}} | | {{Date table sorting|20 March 1972}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|27 March 1971|20 March 1972}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=392, 395–396}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|31 December 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|31 December 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|27 February 1978}} | ||
| {{ayd|31 December 1977| | | {{ayd|31 December 1977|27 February 1978}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Congress CM Devraj Urs enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of Congress CM [[D. Devaraj Urs|Devraj Urs]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=221–225}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 400: | Line 387: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|30 November 1989}} | | {{Date table sorting|30 November 1989}} | ||
| {{ayd|21 April 1989|30 November 1989}} | | {{ayd|21 April 1989|30 November 1989}} | ||
| Loss of majority of CM S. R. Bommai, followed by dissolution of Assembly. On an appeal by S. R. Bommai, in a landmark judgement delivered in 1994, the Indian Supreme Court laid out the procedure to be followed before dissolving an elected assembly. The historic ruling in this case reduced the scope for misuse of Article 356 by future central governments and governors. | | Loss of majority of CM [[S. R. Bommai]], followed by dissolution of Assembly.<ref>Rajghatta, Chidanand; Chawla, Prabhu (15 May 1989). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19890515-janata-dal-government-in-karnataka-falls-governor-venkatasubbiah-role-faces-severe-flak-816073-1989-05-14 "Janata Dal government in Karnataka falls, Governor Venkatasubbiah's role faces severe flak"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240925223205/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19890515-janata-dal-government-in-karnataka-falls-governor-venkatasubbiah-role-faces-severe-flak-816073-1989-05-14 |date=25 September 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> On an appeal by S. R. Bommai, in a landmark judgement delivered in 1994, the Indian Supreme Court laid out the procedure to be followed before dissolving an elected assembly. The historic ruling in this case reduced the scope for misuse of Article 356 by future central governments and governors. | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 406: | Line 393: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 October 1990}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 October 1990}} | ||
| {{ayd|10 October 1990|17 October 1990}} | | {{ayd|10 October 1990|17 October 1990}} | ||
| Government of Veerendra Patil dismissed by Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and state was placed under president's rule with the assembly placed in suspended animation until next chief Minister was elected | | Government of [[Veerendra Patil]] dismissed by Prime Minister [[Rajiv Gandhi|V. P. Singh]] and state was placed under president's rule with the assembly placed in suspended animation until next chief Minister was elected.<ref>Kumar, Yeshwanth; Awasthi, Dilip (31 October 1990). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19901031-spate-of-communal-violence-hits-karnataka-uttar-pradesh-813195-1990-10-30 "Spate of communal violence hits Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503085734/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19901031-spate-of-communal-violence-hits-karnataka-uttar-pradesh-813195-1990-10-30 |date=3 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|9 October 2007}} | | {{Date table sorting|9 October 2007}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|12 November 2007}} | ||
| {{ayd|9 October 2007| | | {{ayd|9 October 2007|12 November 2007}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/presidents-rule-imposed-in-karnataka/articleshow/2444200.cms?from=mdr "President's rule imposed in Karnataka"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411040857/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/presidents-rule-imposed-in-karnataka/articleshow/2444200.cms?from=mdr |date=11 April 2023 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. 10 October 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/presidents-rule-in-karnataka-revoked/articleshow/2528030.cms "President's rule in Karnataka revoked"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613063649/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/presidents-rule-in-karnataka-revoked/articleshow/2528030.cms |date=13 June 2024 }}. ''[[Times of India]]''. 8 November 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|20 November 2007}} | | {{Date table sorting|20 November 2007}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|30 May 2008}} | ||
| {{ayd|20 November 2007| | | {{ayd|20 November 2007|30 May 2008}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref>[https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi/karnataka-again-under-president-s-rule/story-GIcAU9ce7fzGanaVtnSH7M.html?tagtag_uid=606e39ba96429fa5195df7cfcc966937 "Karnataka again under President's rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503184948/https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi/karnataka-again-under-president-s-rule/story-GIcAU9ce7fzGanaVtnSH7M.html?utm_source=admitad&utm_medium=442763_3CejPAogEAC0eSZbHqLcRYB4mYpaVRWGp1R3Ds4522Y7rk&utm_campaign=606e39ba96429fa5195df7cfcc966937&tagtag_uid=606e39ba96429fa5195df7cfcc966937 |date=3 May 2024 }}. ''[[Hindustan Times]]''. 20 November 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="6" | [[Kerala]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|31 July 1959}} | | {{Date table sorting|31 July 1959}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|22 February 1960}} | | {{Date table sorting|22 February 1960}} | ||
| {{ayd|31 July 1959|22 February 1960}} | | {{ayd|31 July 1959|22 February 1960}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Communist CM EMS Namboodiripad enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of Communist CM [[E. M. S. Namboodiripad|EMS Namboodiripad]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jeffrey |first1=Robin |author-link1=Robin Jeffrey |date=March 1991 |title=Jawaharlal Nehru and the smoking gun: Who pulled the trigger on Kerala's communist government in 1959? |journal=[[Commonwealth & Comparative Politics|The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics]] |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=72–85 |doi=10.1080/14662049108447602 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shefi |first1=A. E. |date=December 2019 |title={{transliteration|ml|Vimochana Samaram}} and First Communist Ministry in Kerala: A Historical Analysis |journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress |volume=80 |publication-date=2022 |pages=1150–1158 |jstor=27192970 }}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 431: | Line 418: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|6 March 1967}} | | {{Date table sorting|6 March 1967}} | ||
| {{ayd|10 September 1964|6 March 1967}} | | {{ayd|10 September 1964|6 March 1967}} | ||
| Loss of majority followed by indecisive outcome of elections | | Loss of majority followed by indecisive outcome of elections.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=173–174}}<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=214–215}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|4 August 1970}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|3 October 1970}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|4 August 1970|3 October 1970}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=194–195}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|5 December 1979}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|25 January 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|25 January 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|5 December 1979|25 January 1980}} | ||
| Loss of majority | | Loss of majority.<ref>Kartha, G. S. (31 December 1979). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19791231-political-instability-brings-kerala-under-presidents-rule-again-for-fourth-time-822305-2014-02-11 "Political instability brings Kerala under President's rule again for fourth time"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122628/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19791231-political-instability-brings-kerala-under-presidents-rule-again-for-fourth-time-822305-2014-02-11 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |||
| 5 | |||
| {{Date table sorting|21 October 1981}} | |||
| {{Date table sorting|28 December 1981}} | |||
| {{ayd|21 October 1981|28 December 1981}} | |||
| Loss of majority due to withdrawal of support by [[Congress (Secular)|Congress(S)]] and [[Kerala Congress (M)|Kerala Congress(M)]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Varkey |first1=Ouseph |year=2019 |orig-year=first published by Westview Press in 1984 |chapter=The Rise and Decline of the Left and Democratic Front in Kerala |title=State Politics In Contemporary India: Crisis Or Continuity? |editor-last1=Wood |editor-first1=John R. |edition=ebook |publisher=Routledge |pages=109–118 |doi=10.4324/9780429307454 |isbn=978-0-429-30745-4}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.abhilekh-patal.in/jspui/handle/123456789/2936435 |title=Revocation of the Proclamation made by the President on the 21st October, 1981, in relation to the State of Kerala under article 356 of the Constitution |date=1981 |publisher=Ministry of Home Affairs |location=New Delhi |page=11 |access-date=4 May 2024 |url-access=registration |via=[[National Archives of India]] |archive-date=13 June 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613064714/https://www.abhilekh-patal.in/jspui/handle/123456789/2936435 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
|-style="text-align:center" | |||
| 6 | |||
| {{date table sorting|17 March 1982}} | |||
| {{date table sorting|24 May 1982}} | |||
| {{ayd|17 March 1982|24 May 1982}} | |||
|Loss of majority following defection of [[Lonappan Nambadan]].<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mehar |first1=Rakesh |last2=Balan |first2=Saritha S. |date=19 June 2017 |title=Kerala Chronicles: How an Assembly Speaker kept a Congress govt afloat for 3 months in 1982 |url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/features/kerala-chronicles-how-assembly-speaker-kept-congress-govt-afloat-3-months-1982-63902 |access-date=4 May 2024 |work=[[The News Minute]] |archive-date=31 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231231124706/https://www.thenewsminute.com/features/kerala-chronicles-how-assembly-speaker-kept-congress-govt-afloat-3-months-1982-63902 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Kamath |first=P. M. |date=October 1985 |title=Politics of Defection in India in the 1980s |journal=[[Asian Survey]] |volume=25 |issue=10 |pages=1039–1054 |doi=10.2307/2644180 |jstor=2644180 }}</ref>{{rp|p=1052}} | |||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="3"| [[Madhya Pradesh]] | | rowspan="3"| [[Madhya Pradesh]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|30 April 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|23 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|23 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Shyama Charan Shukla enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Shyama Charan Shukla]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|9 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|9 June 1980}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Sundar Lal Patwa enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Sunder Lal Patwa|Sundar Lal Patwa]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 462: | Line 461: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|7 December 1993}} | | {{Date table sorting|7 December 1993}} | ||
| {{ayd|15 December 1992|7 December 1993}} | | {{ayd|15 December 1992|7 December 1993}} | ||
| Govt. dismissed in the aftermath of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan destruction in Uttar Pradesh. | | Govt. dismissed in the aftermath of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan destruction in Uttar Pradesh.<ref name=":5" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="3"| [[Maharashtra]] | | rowspan="3"| [[Maharashtra]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|9 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|17 February 1980| | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|9 June 1980}} | ||
| Govt. dismissed in spite of Sharad Pawar enjoying majority support in the Assembly | | Govt. dismissed in spite of [[Sharad Pawar]] enjoying majority support in the Assembly.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 475: | Line 474: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|31 October 2014}} | | {{Date table sorting|31 October 2014}} | ||
| {{ayd|28 September 2014|31 October 2014}} | | {{ayd|28 September 2014|31 October 2014}} | ||
| Govt. dismissed since Congress Separated from its allies NCP and Others. | | Govt. dismissed since Congress Separated from its allies [[Nationalist Congress Party|NCP]] and Others.<ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/presidents-rule-imposed-in-maharashtra/articleshow/43713750.cms "President's rule imposed in Maharashtra"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122615/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/presidents-rule-imposed-in-maharashtra/articleshow/43713750.cms |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Times of India]]''. 28 September 2014. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 481: | Line 480: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|23 November 2019}} | | {{Date table sorting|23 November 2019}} | ||
| 11 days | | 11 days | ||
| No party could form a government after a fractured election verdict and Shiv Sena broke the pre-poll alliance it had with the BJP. See also: [[2019 Maharashtra political crisis]]. | | No party could form a government after a fractured election verdict and [[Shiv Sena (1966–2022)|Shiv Sena]] broke the pre-poll alliance it had with the BJP.<ref>Singh, Vijaita (12 November 2019). [https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/presidents-rule-imposed-in-maharashtra/article61620369.ece "Maharashtra placed under President's Rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220625070934/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/presidents-rule-imposed-in-maharashtra/article61620369.ece |date=25 June 2022 }}. ''[[The Hindu]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> See also: [[2019 Maharashtra political crisis]]. | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="10" |[[Manipur]] | |||
| 1 | |||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|25 October 1967}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|19 | | {{Date table sorting|19 February 1968}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|25 October 1967|19 February 1968}} | ||
| | | Short lived ministry collapsed following resignation of speaker, resulting in neither ruling nor opposition congress having a clear majority in the assembly. Assembly kept in suspended animation.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19671026&printsec=frontpage&hl=en "Centre takes over Manipur rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221218053746/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19671026&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |date=18 December 2022 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 26 October 1967. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|16 October 1969}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|20 March 1972}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|16 October 1969|20 March 1972}} | ||
| | | Violent secessionist insurgency and statehood demands resulted in breakdown of law and order.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=206–207}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|28 March 1973}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|4 March 1974}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|28 March 1973|4 March 1974}} | ||
| | | President's rule was imposed even though the opposition had a "tenuous" majority and could have formed a government.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=208-209}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|16 May 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|26 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|16 May 1977|26 June 1977}} | ||
| President's | | Collapse of Government following defections.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Yambem |first1=Sanamani |date=11 June 1977 |title=Back to President's Rule |journal=[[Economic and Political Weekly]] |volume=12 |issue=24 |page=945 |jstor=4365678 }}</ref><ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=213–214}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|14 November 1979}} | | {{Date table sorting|14 November 1979}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|13 January 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|13 January 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|14 November 1979|13 January 1980}} | | {{ayd|14 November 1979|13 January 1980}} | ||
| Discontent within Janata Party Government and corruption charges led to dismissal of government and dissolution of Assembly. | | Discontent within Janata Party Government and corruption charges led to dismissal of government and dissolution of Assembly.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dhavan |first1=Rajeev |author-link1=Rajeev Dhavan |date=October–December 1989 |title=President's Rule: Recent Trends |journal=Journal of the Indian Law Institute |volume=31 |issue=4 |pages=521–533 |jstor=43951266 }}</ref>{{rp|pp=523–524}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | |||
| {{Date table sorting|28 February 1981}} | |||
| {{Date table sorting|19 June 1981}} | |||
| {{ayd|28 February 1981|19 June 1981}} | |||
| Incumbent Government fell following defections. Governor did not permit an alternate government to be formed by People's Democratic Front on the basis of his assessment regarding stability of the proposed ministry.<ref>Laithangbam, Swarnalata (31 March 1981). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19810331-presidents-rule-imposed-in-manipur-congressi-and-pdf-stake-claim-to-rule-772801-2013-11-25 "President's rule imposed in Manipur, Congress(I) and PDF stake claim to rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122634/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19810331-presidents-rule-imposed-in-manipur-congressi-and-pdf-stake-claim-to-rule-772801-2013-11-25 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | |||
|- style="text-align:center" | |||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|7 January 1992}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|8 April 1992}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|7 January 1992|8 April 1992}} | ||
| Incumbent Government fell following defections. | | Incumbent coalition Government fell following defections. president's rule imposed keeping assembly in suspension.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19920108&printsec=frontpage&hl=en "Manipur placed under Delhi rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502175314/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19920108&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 8 January 1992. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|31 December 1993}} | | {{Date table sorting|31 December 1993}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|13 December 1994}} | | {{Date table sorting|13 December 1994}} | ||
| {{ayd|31 December 1993|13 December 1994}} | | {{ayd|31 December 1993|13 December 1994}} | ||
| 1000 persons died in Naga-Kuki clashes and continued violence | | 1000 persons died in [[Kuki-Naga conflict in Manipur|Naga-Kuki clashes]] and continued violence.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19940101&printsec=frontpage&hl=en "Manipur placed under Central rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122622/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19940101&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 1 January 1994. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 9 | |||
| {{Date table sorting|2 June 2001}} | |||
| {{Date table sorting|5 March 2002}} | |||
| {{ayd|2 June 2001|5 March 2002}} | |||
| Loss of majority.<ref>Chaudhuri, Kalyan (16 February 2002). [https://frontline.thehindu.com/politics/article30243973.ece "Uncertain in Manipur"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122633/https://frontline.thehindu.com/politics/article30243973.ece |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Frontline (magazine)|Frontline]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | |||
|- style="text-align:center" | |||
| 10 | | 10 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|13 February 2025}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|3 February 2026}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|13 February 2025|3 February 2026}} | ||
| | |[[List of chief ministers of Manipur|Chief Minister]] [[N. Biren Singh]] resigned following the [[2023–2025 Manipur violence]] amidst a crisis of possible no-confidence motion. Assembly put under suspended animation.<ref name=":7">{{Cite news |last= |first= |date=2025-02-13 |title=President’s rule imposed in Manipur |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/manipur/presidents-rule-imposed-in-manipur/article69215923.ece |access-date=2025-02-13 |work=The Hindu |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | [[List of chief ministers of Manipur|Chief Minister]] [[Yumnam Khemchand Singh]] appointed new CM & President’s rule finally lifted after nearly 1 year.<ref name=":7">{{Cite news |last= |first= |date=2026-02-03 |title=President’s rule imposed in Manipur |url=https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.economictimes.com/news/newsblogs/february-4-india-us-trade-deal-modi-trump-tariffs-parliament-debate-rahul-gandhi-delhi-weather-iran-bangladesh-icc-t-20-world-cup-ind-pakistan-news/amp_liveblog/127897742.cms |access-date=2026-02-06 |work=The Economic Times |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref> | ||
| rowspan="2"| [[Meghalaya]] | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="2" | [[Meghalaya]] | |||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|11 October 1991}} | | {{Date table sorting|11 October 1991}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|5 February 1992}} | | {{Date table sorting|5 February 1992}} | ||
| {{ayd|11 October 1991|5 February 1992}} | | {{ayd|11 October 1991|5 February 1992}} | ||
| The Centre imposed president's rule in Meghalaya in the wake of a political crisis after the then Speaker PR Kyndiah suspended five MLAs, mostly independents, on grounds of defection.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.merinews.com/article/meghalaya-clamped-under-presidents-rule/15752671.shtml#sthash.lD2Rcimi.dpuf|title=Meghalaya clamped under President's Rule|website=www.merinews.com|access-date=5 April 2018}}</ref> | | The Centre imposed president's rule in Meghalaya in the wake of a political crisis after the then Speaker [[Paty Ripple Kyndiah|PR Kyndiah]] suspended five MLAs, mostly independents, on grounds of defection.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.merinews.com/article/meghalaya-clamped-under-presidents-rule/15752671.shtml#sthash.lD2Rcimi.dpuf|title=Meghalaya clamped under President's Rule|website=www.merinews.com|access-date=5 April 2018|archive-date=5 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200605092843/http://www.merinews.com/article/meghalaya-clamped-under-presidents-rule/15752671.shtml#sthash.lD2Rcimi.dpuf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>Majumdar, Sarbari (15 November 1991). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19911115-biased-rulings-spark-trouble-in-meghalaya-815090-1991-11-14 "Biased rulings spark trouble in Meghalaya"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240925223204/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19911115-biased-rulings-spark-trouble-in-meghalaya-815090-1991-11-14 |date=25 September 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|19 March 2009}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|13 May 2009}} | ||
| {{ayd|18 March 2009| | | {{ayd|18 March 2009|13 May 2009}} | ||
| Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Donkupar Roy | | Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM [[Donkupar Roy]].<ref>Karmakar, Rahul; Sharma, Nagendar (19 March 2009). [https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/president-s-rule-in-meghalaya/story-q8liBCWp9uNUWHYiBrKFlK.html "President's Rule in Meghalaya"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122621/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/president-s-rule-in-meghalaya/story-q8liBCWp9uNUWHYiBrKFlK.html |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Hindustan Times]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="3"| [[Mizoram]] | | rowspan="3"| [[Mizoram]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|11 May 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|11 May 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|2 June 1978}} | ||
| {{ayd|11 May 1977| | | {{ayd|11 May 1977|2 June 1978}} | ||
| Mizo Union Ministry led by Chief Minister Chhunga resigned in May 1977, ostensibly to facilitate the progress of peace talks.<ref name=sinha2007>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ngtgH9RYB0EC |title=Lost Opportunities: 50 Years of Insurgency in the North-east and India's|author=S. P. Sinha |access-date= 14 July 2021 |isbn=9788170621621 |publisher=Lancer Publishers |date=2007}}</ref>{{rp|95|quote=Mizo Union Ministry led by Chief Minister Chhunga resigned in May 1977, ostensibly to facilitate the progress of peace talks}} | | [[Mizo Union]] Ministry led by Chief Minister [[C. Chhunga|Chhunga]] resigned in May 1977, ostensibly to facilitate the progress of peace talks.<ref name=sinha2007>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ngtgH9RYB0EC |title=Lost Opportunities: 50 Years of Insurgency in the North-east and India's|author=S. P. Sinha |access-date= 14 July 2021 |isbn=9788170621621 |publisher=Lancer Publishers |date=2007}}</ref>{{rp|95|quote=Mizo Union Ministry led by Chief Minister Chhunga resigned in May 1977, ostensibly to facilitate the progress of peace talks}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|11 November 1978}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|8 May 1979}} | | {{Date table sorting|8 May 1979}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|11 November 1978|8 May 1979}} | ||
| Chief Minister Sailo's refusal to grant undue favours caused dissension in his party which led to the fall of his government and imposition of president's rule.<ref name=sinha2007/>{{rp|96–97|quote=Sailo's refusal to grant undue favours caused dissension in his party which led to the fall of his government and imposition of president's rule}} | | Chief Minister [[T. Sailo|Sailo]]'s refusal to grant undue favours caused dissension in his party which led to the fall of his government and imposition of president's rule.<ref name=sinha2007/>{{rp|96–97|quote=Sailo's refusal to grant undue favours caused dissension in his party which led to the fall of his government and imposition of president's rule}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 574: | Line 574: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|24 January 1989}} | | {{Date table sorting|24 January 1989}} | ||
| {{ayd|7 September 1988|24 January 1989}} | | {{ayd|7 September 1988|24 January 1989}} | ||
| Defections reduced the Government to minority | | Defections reduced the Government to minority.<ref>Menon, Ramesh (30 September 1988). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19880930-mizoram-comes-under-president-rule-797758-1988-09-29 "Mizoram comes under President's Rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122616/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19880930-mizoram-comes-under-president-rule-797758-1988-09-29 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="4"| [[Nagaland]] | | rowspan="4"| [[Nagaland]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|22 March 1975}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|25 November 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|25 November 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|22 March 1975|25 November 1977}} | ||
| Defections and counter defections led to imposition of president's rule | | Defections and counter defections led to imposition of president's rule.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=230-231}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 587: | Line 587: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|25 January 1989}} | | {{Date table sorting|25 January 1989}} | ||
| {{ayd|7 August 1988|25 January 1989}} | | {{ayd|7 August 1988|25 January 1989}} | ||
| The state was under a brief spell of central rule again after the Hokishe Sema-led Congress government was reduced to a minority. The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court in held to be invalid in 1994. | | The state was under a brief spell of central rule again after the [[Hokishe Sema]]-led Congress government was reduced to a minority.<ref>Menon, Ramesh (31 August 1988). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19880831-presidents-rule-imposed-in-nagaland-under-questionable-circumstances-797609-1988-08-30 "President's Rule imposed in Nagaland under questionable circumstances"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122626/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19880831-presidents-rule-imposed-in-nagaland-under-questionable-circumstances-797609-1988-08-30 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court in held to be invalid in 1994. | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 593: | Line 593: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|22 February 1993}} | | {{Date table sorting|22 February 1993}} | ||
| {{ayd|2 April 1992|22 February 1993}} | | {{ayd|2 April 1992|22 February 1993}} | ||
| Fluid party position and deteriorating law and order situation | | Fluid party position and deteriorating law and order situation.<ref>Menon, R. (30 April 1992). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19920430-nagaland-manipur-turn-political-hot-spots-766206-2013-06-18 "Nagaland, Manipur turn political hot spots"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503085736/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19920430-nagaland-manipur-turn-political-hot-spots-766206-2013-06-18 |date=3 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 599: | Line 599: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|12 March 2008}} | | {{Date table sorting|12 March 2008}} | ||
| {{ayd|3 January 2008|12 March 2008}} | | {{ayd|3 January 2008|12 March 2008}} | ||
| Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Neiphiu Rio | | Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM [[Neiphiu Rio]].<ref>[https://www.indiatoday.in/latest-headlines/story/presidents-rule-had-become-necessary-in-nagaland-governor-22030-2008-01-04 "President's Rule had become necessary in Nagaland: Governor"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503084727/https://www.indiatoday.in/latest-headlines/story/presidents-rule-had-become-necessary-in-nagaland-governor-22030-2008-01-04 |date=3 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. 7 September 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>[https://www.indiatoday.in/latest-headlines/story/presidents-rule-revoked-in-nagaland-23561-2008-03-12 "President's rule revoked in Nagaland"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122620/https://www.indiatoday.in/latest-headlines/story/presidents-rule-revoked-in-nagaland-23561-2008-03-12 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. 12 March 2008. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="6"| [[Odisha]] | | rowspan="6"| [[Odisha]] | ||
| Line 606: | Line 606: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|23 June 1961}} | | {{Date table sorting|23 June 1961}} | ||
| {{ayd|25 February 1961|23 June 1961}} | | {{ayd|25 February 1961|23 June 1961}} | ||
| Harekrishna Mahtab led Congress-Gantantra Parishad Minority Government resigned on 21 February 1961 due to differences in the Congress Party. President's rule was imposed on 25 February 1961. | | [[Harekrushna Mahatab|Harekrishna Mahtab]] led Congress-[[All India Ganatantra Parishad|Gantantra Parishad]] Minority Government resigned on 21 February 1961 due to differences in the Congress Party. President's rule was imposed on 25 February 1961.<ref>Sethy, Rabindra Kumar (2003). [https://books.google.com/books?id=-2kJusgGxiQC&pg=PA134 ''Political Crisis and President's Rule in an Indian State'']. New Delhi: A. P. H. Publishing Company. pp. 134–135. {{ISBN|978-81-7648-463-3}} Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 612: | Line 612: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|3 April 1971}} | | {{Date table sorting|3 April 1971}} | ||
| {{ayd|11 January 1971|3 April 1971}} | | {{ayd|11 January 1971|3 April 1971}} | ||
| Break-up of coalition | | Break-up of coalition.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=239–244}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 618: | Line 618: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|6 March 1974}} | | {{Date table sorting|6 March 1974}} | ||
| {{ayd|3 March 1973|6 March 1974}} | | {{ayd|3 March 1973|6 March 1974}} | ||
| Facing imminent collapse of government, incumbent chief minister recommended dissolution of assembly and fresh elections. | | Facing imminent collapse of government, incumbent chief minister recommended dissolution of assembly and fresh elections.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=245–247}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 624: | Line 624: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|29 December 1976}} | | {{Date table sorting|29 December 1976}} | ||
| {{ayd|16 December 1976|29 December 1976}} | | {{ayd|16 December 1976|29 December 1976}} | ||
| Chief Minister Nandini Satpathy was forced out and assembly placed under suspended animation. A new Congress government was sworn in after revocation of president's rule. | | Chief Minister [[Nandini Satpathy]] was forced out and assembly placed under suspended animation. A new Congress government was sworn in after revocation of president's rule.<ref>[https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19770115-orissa-chief-minister-nandini-satpathy-resigns-823541-2014-07-10 "Orissa Chief Minister Nandini Satpathy resigns"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502224617/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19770115-orissa-chief-minister-nandini-satpathy-resigns-823541-2014-07-10 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. 15 January 1977. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| Line 630: | Line 630: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|26 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|26 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 April 1977|26 June 1977}} | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|26 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Binayak Acharya enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Binayak Acharya]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
| Line 636: | Line 636: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|9 June 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|9 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|17 February 1980|9 June 1980}} | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|9 June 1980}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Nilamani Routray enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Nilamani Routray]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| [[Patiala and East Punjab States Union]] | | [[Patiala and East Punjab States Union]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|4 March 1953}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|7 March 1954}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|4 March 1953|7 March 1954}} | ||
| President's rule was invoked in the erstwhile PEPSU ([[Patiala and East Punjab States Union]] ) State when the Akali Dal government, led by [[Gian Singh Rarewala]], was dismissed | | President's rule was invoked in the erstwhile PEPSU ([[Patiala and East Punjab States Union]] ) State when the [[Shiromani Akali Dal|Akali Dal]] government, led by [[Gian Singh Rarewala]], was dismissed.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HcY-AAAAIBAJ&sjid=gEwMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2413%2C278840 "President's Rule for PEPSU"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122615/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HcY-AAAAIBAJ&sjid=gEwMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2413,278840 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 6 March 1953. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>[https://www.epw.in/journal/1953/9/weekly-notes/president-s-rule-pepsu.html "President's rule for PEPSU?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613064655/https://www.epw.in/journal/1953/9/weekly-notes/president-s-rule-pepsu.html |date=13 June 2024 }}. ''[[Economic and Political Weekly]]''. '''5''' (9): 235. 28 February 1953. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="7"| [[Puducherry (union territory)|Puducherry]] | | rowspan="7"| [[Puducherry (union territory)|Puducherry]] | ||
| Line 650: | Line 650: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 March 1969}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 March 1969}} | ||
| {{ayd|18 September 1968|17 March 1969}} | | {{ayd|18 September 1968|17 March 1969}} | ||
| Assembly was dissolved and president's rule imposed as opposition parties had a chance to form a government after the fall of the Congress government. | | Assembly was dissolved and president's rule imposed as opposition parties had a chance to form a government after the fall of the Congress government.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19680919&printsec=frontpage&hl=en "President takes over in Pondy"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503084728/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19680919&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |date=3 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 19 September 1968. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=269–270}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 656: | Line 656: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|6 March 1974}} | | {{Date table sorting|6 March 1974}} | ||
| {{ayd|3 January 1974|6 March 1974}} | | {{ayd|3 January 1974|6 March 1974}} | ||
| Assembly dissolved after fall of DMK government following decision of two ministers to join newly formed AIADMK. | | Assembly dissolved after fall of [[Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam|DMK]] government following decision of two ministers to join newly formed [[All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam|AIADMK]].<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=271–272}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 662: | Line 662: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|2 July 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|2 July 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|28 March 1974|2 July 1977}} | | {{ayd|28 March 1974|2 July 1977}} | ||
| Fall of coalition government of AIADMK, Congress(O)following division of votes by Congress(R) and DMK. The Assembly was dissolved. | | Fall of coalition government of AIADMK, [[Indian National Congress (Organisation)|Congress(O)]] following division of votes by [[Indian National Congress (R)|Congress(R)]] and DMK. The Assembly was dissolved.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=272–274}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 668: | Line 668: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|16 January 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|16 January 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|12 November 1978|16 January 1980}} | | {{ayd|12 November 1978|16 January 1980}} | ||
| Fall of government due to political instability | | Fall of government due to political instability.<ref>[https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/forty-years-ago-november-13-1978-5443226/ "Forty Years Ago: November 13, 1978"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122618/https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/forty-years-ago-november-13-1978-5443226/ |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 13 November 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| Line 674: | Line 674: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|16 March 1985}} | | {{Date table sorting|16 March 1985}} | ||
| {{ayd|24 June 1983|16 March 1985}} | | {{ayd|24 June 1983|16 March 1985}} | ||
| Government dismissed following withdrawal of Congress(I) from coalition government. In spite of incumbent chief minister asking for an opportunity to prove his majority on the floor of the house, the assembly was dissolved. | | Government dismissed following withdrawal of Congress(I) from coalition government. In spite of incumbent chief minister asking for an opportunity to prove his majority on the floor of the house, the assembly was dissolved.<ref>Chatterjee, Sibranjan (1992). "The Dismissal of the Ministry". ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=8UQpnoasCDYC&pg=PA136 Governor's Role in the Indian Constitution]''. New Delhi: Mittal Publications. p. 136. {{ISBN|978-81-7099-325-4}}. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|12 January 1991}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|4 July 1991}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|12 January 1991|4 July 1991}} | ||
| DMK Government dismissed in spite of having a majority in the Assembly | | DMK Government dismissed in spite of having a majority in the Assembly.<ref>Badhwar, Inderjit; Chawla, Prabhu (15 March 1991). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19910315-president-r-venkataraman-faces-criticism-for-playing-partisan-politics-814152-1991-03-14 "President R. Venkataraman faces criticism for playing partisan politics"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613064655/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19910315-president-r-venkataraman-faces-criticism-for-playing-partisan-politics-814152-1991-03-14 |date=13 June 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7oNlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gZ4NAAAAIBAJ&pg=1054%2C3504304 "Pondy Assembly dissolved; uproarious scenes in LS"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122616/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7oNlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=gZ4NAAAAIBAJ&pg=1054,3504304 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 5 March 1991. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
| Line 686: | Line 686: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|7 May 2021}} | | {{Date table sorting|7 May 2021}} | ||
| {{ayd|25 February 2021|7 May 2021}} | | {{ayd|25 February 2021|7 May 2021}} | ||
| Congress Government | | Congress Government resigned due to loss of majority and no alternate claimant to form next government.<ref>[https://scroll.in/latest/987941/presidents-rule-imposed-in-puducherry "President's Rule imposed in Puducherry"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122627/https://scroll.in/latest/987941/presidents-rule-imposed-in-puducherry |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Scroll.in]]''. 25 February 2021. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="8"| [[Punjab, India|Punjab]] | | rowspan="8"| [[Punjab, India|Punjab]] | ||
| Line 693: | Line 693: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 April 1952}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 April 1952}} | ||
| {{ayd|20 June 1951|17 April 1952}} | | {{ayd|20 June 1951|17 April 1952}} | ||
| | |Prime Minister [[Jawaharlal Nehru]] kept the [[Punjab Legislative Assembly|Punjab Assembly]] in suspension for nine months and 28 days to help the state Congress government get its act together.<ref>[[Baldev Raj Nayar|Nayar, Baldev Raj]] (1968). "Punjab". In [[Myron Weiner|Weiner, Myron]] (ed.). ''[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.131635/page/n467/mode/2up?view=theater State Politics in India]''. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 463–467. [[OCLC (identifier)|OCLC]] [https://search.worldcat.org/title/501863 501863]. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 699: | Line 699: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|1 November 1966}} | | {{Date table sorting|1 November 1966}} | ||
| {{ayd|5 July 1966|1 November 1966}} | | {{ayd|5 July 1966|1 November 1966}} | ||
| State administration was taken over, ostensibly to facilitate bifurcation of Punjab state into two, Punjab and Haryana | | State administration was taken over, ostensibly to facilitate bifurcation of Punjab state into two, Punjab and Haryana.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=282–283}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 705: | Line 705: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 February 1969}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 February 1969}} | ||
| {{ayd|23 August 1968|17 February 1969}} | | {{ayd|23 August 1968|17 February 1969}} | ||
| Break-up of coalition | | Break-up of coalition.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=286–287}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|15 June 1971}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 March 1972}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 March 1972}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|15 June 1971|17 March 1972}} | ||
| Following poor performance in March, 1971 Lok Sabha Elections, incumbent Chief Minister advised dissolving state assembly and holding fresh elections to state legislature. | | Following poor performance in March, [[1971 Indian general election|1971 Lok Sabha Elections]], incumbent Chief Minister advised dissolving state assembly and holding fresh elections to state legislature.<ref>Arora, Subhash Chander (1990). "Governor's Whim Prevails – 1971". ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=41HYYdO21KQC&pg=PA180 President's Rule in Indian States: A Study of Punjab]'' (1st ed.). Delhi: Mittal Publications. pp. 180–200. {{ISBN|978-81-7099-234-9}}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| Line 717: | Line 717: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|20 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|20 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 April 1977|20 June 1977}} | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|20 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Giani Zail Singh enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of Giani [[Zail Singh]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|7 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|17 February 1980| | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|7 June 1980}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Parkash Singh Badal enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Parkash Singh Badal]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|6 October 1983}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|29 September 1985}} | | {{Date table sorting|29 September 1985}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|6 October 1983|29 September 1985}} | ||
| [[ | | Many [[Khalistan Movement|Khalistani]] separatist groups announced the creation of Khalistan.<ref>[[Shekhar Gupta|Gupta, Shekhar]]; Thukral, Gobind (31 October 1983). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19831031-punjab-crisis-takes-dramatic-turn-darbara-singh-govt-dismissed-presidents-rule-imposed-771128-2013-07-17 "Punjab crisis takes dramatic turn, Darbara Singh govt dismissed, President's Rule imposed"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502180204/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19831031-punjab-crisis-takes-dramatic-turn-darbara-singh-govt-dismissed-presidents-rule-imposed-771128-2013-07-17 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|11 May 1987}} | | {{Date table sorting|11 May 1987}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|23 February 1992}} | ||
| {{ayd|11 | | {{ayd|11 May 1987|23 February 1992}} | ||
| [ | | Breakdown of law and order by several militant groups.<ref>Chawla, G. S. (12 March 1987). [https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=sIJlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=up4NAAAAIBAJ&pg=1723%2C1327693 "Punjab comes under President's rule: Assembly in suspended animation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240925223310/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=sIJlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=up4NAAAAIBAJ&pg=1723%2C1327693 |date=25 September 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="4"| [[Rajasthan]] | | rowspan="4"| [[Rajasthan]] | ||
| Line 742: | Line 742: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|26 April 1967}} | | {{Date table sorting|26 April 1967}} | ||
| {{ayd|13 March 1967|26 April 1967}} | | {{ayd|13 March 1967|26 April 1967}} | ||
| Indecisive outcome of elections | | Indecisive outcome of elections.<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=281, 285–287}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|30 April 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|22 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|22 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|22 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Hari Dev Joshi enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Hari Dev Joshi]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|5 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd| | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|5 June 1980}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Bhairon Singh Shekhawat enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Bhairon Singh Shekhawat]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 760: | Line 760: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|4 December 1993}} | | {{Date table sorting|4 December 1993}} | ||
| {{ayd|15 December 1992|4 December 1993}} | | {{ayd|15 December 1992|4 December 1993}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Bhairon Singh Shekhawat enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of Bhairon Singh Shekhawat enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":5" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="2"| [[Sikkim]] | | rowspan="2"| [[Sikkim]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|18 August 1978}} | | {{Date table sorting|18 August 1978}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|17 October 1979}} | ||
| {{ayd|18 August 1978| | | {{ayd|18 August 1978|17 October 1979}} | ||
| Loss of majority following split in Kazi Lhendup Dorji led Janata Party government. The central government imposed president's rule and followed up with electoral reforms before ordering fresh elections. | | Loss of majority following split in [[Kazi Lhendup Dorjee|Kazi Lhendup Dorji]] led Janata Party government. The central government imposed president's rule and followed up with electoral reforms before ordering fresh elections.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Phadnis |first1=Urmila |author-link1=Urmila Phadnis |date=December 1980 |title=Ethnic Dimensions of Sikkimese Politics: The 1979 Elections |journal=[[Asian Survey]] |volume=20 |issue=12 |pages=1236–1252 |doi=10.2307/2643629 |jstor=2643629 }}</ref>{{rp|pp=1244–1248, 1250}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 773: | Line 773: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|8 March 1985}} | | {{Date table sorting|8 March 1985}} | ||
| {{ayd|25 May 1984|8 March 1985}} | | {{ayd|25 May 1984|8 March 1985}} | ||
| Congress Government formed following induced collapse of Nar Bahadur Bhandari Sikkim Janata Parishad Government was dismissed as it did not enjoy a majority in the Assembly. | | Congress Government formed following induced collapse of [[Nar Bahadur Bhandari]] [[Sikkim Janata Parishad]] Government was dismissed as it did not enjoy a majority in the Assembly.<ref>Claiborne, William (26 May 1984). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/05/26/sikkim-put-under-federal-rule-after-mass-party-shift/623c9f18-ac7e-43a3-bc39-1644b30f138a/ "Sikkim Put Under Federal Rule After Mass Party Shift"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240925223217/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/05/26/sikkim-put-under-federal-rule-after-mass-party-shift/623c9f18-ac7e-43a3-bc39-1644b30f138a/ |date=25 September 2024 }}. ''[[Washington Post]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hardgrave |first1=Robert L. |date=February 1985 |title=India in 1984: Confrontation, Assassination, and Succession |journal=[[Asian Survey]] |volume=25 |issue=2, A Survey of Asia in 1984: Part II |pages=131–144 |doi=10.2307/2644297 |jstor=2644297 }}</ref>{{rp|p=135}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="4"| [[Tamil Nadu]] | | rowspan="4"| [[Tamil Nadu]] | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|31 January 1976}} | | {{Date table sorting|31 January 1976}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|30 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|31 January 1976| | | {{ayd|31 January 1976|30 June 1977}} | ||
| The government headed by former chief minister [[M. Karunanidhi]] was dismissed by former prime minister [[Indira Gandhi]] in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly, due to charges of corruption while the [[Sarkaria Commission]] was set up to probe the allegations. | | The government headed by former chief minister [[M. Karunanidhi]] was dismissed by former prime minister [[Indira Gandhi]] in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly, due to charges of corruption while the [[Sarkaria Commission]] was set up to probe the allegations.<ref>Marthandam, Nambi (29 February 1976). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19760229-president-fakhruddin-ali-ahmed-dismisses-dmk-ministry-places-tamil-nadu-under-presidents-rule-819615-2015-04-29 "President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed dismisses DMK ministry, places Tamil Nadu under President's Rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220903073840/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19760229-president-fakhruddin-ali-ahmed-dismisses-dmk-ministry-places-tamil-nadu-under-presidents-rule-819615-2015-04-29 |date=3 September 2022 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|17 February 1980}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|9 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|17 February 1980| | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|9 June 1980}} | ||
| The government headed by former chief minister [[M. G. Ramachandran]] was dismissed by former prime minister [[Indira Gandhi]] in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly. | | The government headed by former chief minister [[M. G. Ramachandran]] was dismissed by former prime minister [[Indira Gandhi]] in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|30 January 1988}} | | {{Date table sorting|30 January 1988}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|27 January 1989}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 January 1988| | | {{ayd|30 January 1988|27 January 1989}} | ||
| The government headed by former chief minister [[V. N. Janaki|V. N. Janaki Ramachandran]] was dismissed by former prime minister | | The government headed by former chief minister [[V. N. Janaki|V. N. Janaki Ramachandran]] was dismissed by former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi after controversial confidence vote secured by her in the legislative assembly.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19880131&printsec=frontpage&hl=en "TN Assembly dissolved: elections soon"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502175316/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19880131&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 31 January 1988. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|30 January 1991}} | | {{Date table sorting|30 January 1991}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|24 June 1991}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 January 1991| | | {{ayd|30 January 1991|24 June 1991}} | ||
| The government headed by former chief minister [[M. Karunanidhi]] was dismissed by former prime minister [[Chandra Shekhar]] on charges of supporting anti-national activities, in spite of the governor [[Surjit Singh Barnala]]'s report and enjoying majority in the legislative assembly.<ref name="Congress had no role in dismissing DMK govt in 1991">{{cite web | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-had-no-role-in-dismissing-dmk-govt-in-1991/article8475243.ece | title=Congress had no role in dismissing DMK govt in 1991 | work=The Hindu| date=14 April 2016 | access-date=25 June 2016}}</ref> | | The government headed by former chief minister [[M. Karunanidhi]] was dismissed by former prime minister [[Chandra Shekhar]] on charges of supporting anti-national activities, in spite of the governor [[Surjit Singh Barnala]]'s report and enjoying majority in the legislative assembly.<ref name="Congress had no role in dismissing DMK govt in 1991">{{cite web | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-had-no-role-in-dismissing-dmk-govt-in-1991/article8475243.ece | title=Congress had no role in dismissing DMK govt in 1991 | work=The Hindu | date=14 April 2016 | access-date=25 June 2016 | archive-date=10 December 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161210211324/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-had-no-role-in-dismissing-dmk-govt-in-1991/article8475243.ece | url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| [[Travancore-Cochin]] | | [[Travancore-Cochin]] | ||
| Line 805: | Line 805: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|5 April 1957}} | | {{Date table sorting|5 April 1957}} | ||
| {{ayd|23 March 1956|5 April 1957}} | | {{ayd|23 March 1956|5 April 1957}} | ||
| Loss of majority following split in Congress Party | | Loss of majority following split in Congress Party.<ref>Maheshwari, Shriram (1977). ''[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.111304/mode/2up?view=theater President's rule in India]''. New Delhi: Macmillan. {{ISBN|978-0-333-90186-1}} {{OCLC|470784780}}</ref>{{Rp|pages=33–35}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="3"| [[Tripura]] | | rowspan="3"| [[Tripura]] | ||
| Line 812: | Line 812: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|20 March 1972}} | | {{Date table sorting|20 March 1972}} | ||
| {{ayd|1 November 1971|20 March 1972}} | | {{ayd|1 November 1971|20 March 1972}} | ||
| In the backdrop of refugee influx due to Bangladesh Liberation War, split in the Congress and Communist agitation for Tripura to become a full-fledged state, president's rule was imposed. On 1 January 1972 Tripura became a State and assembly elections held subsequently. | | In the backdrop of refugee influx due to [[Bangladesh Liberation War]], split in the Congress and Communist agitation for Tripura to become a full-fledged state, president's rule was imposed. On 1 January 1972 Tripura became a State and assembly elections held subsequently.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=320}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|5 November 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|5 November 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting| | | {{Date table sorting|4 January 1978}} | ||
| {{ayd|5 November 1977| | | {{ayd|5 November 1977|4 January 1978}} | ||
| Collapse of short lived government in a fluid political environment | | Collapse of short lived government in a fluid political environment.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|page=322}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 824: | Line 824: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|10 April 1993}} | | {{Date table sorting|10 April 1993}} | ||
| {{ayd|11 March 1993|10 April 1993}} | | {{ayd|11 March 1993|10 April 1993}} | ||
| Elections postponed from 15 February 1993 to 3 April 1993 on account of deteriorating law and order situation. Caretaker CM resigns. | | Elections postponed from 15 February 1993 to 3 April 1993 on account of deteriorating law and order situation. Caretaker CM resigns.<ref>Banerjee, R; Baweja, H (31 March 1993). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19930331-prime-minister-narasimha-rao-sacrifices-tripura-government-to-curry-favour-with-the-left-810860-1993-03-30 "Prime Minister Narasimha Rao sacrifices Tripura Government to curry favour with the Left"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502180203/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19930331-prime-minister-narasimha-rao-sacrifices-tripura-government-to-curry-favour-with-the-left-810860-1993-03-30 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="9"| [[Uttar Pradesh]] | | rowspan="9"| [[Uttar Pradesh]] | ||
| Line 831: | Line 831: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|26 February 1969}} | | {{Date table sorting|26 February 1969}} | ||
| {{ayd|25 February 1968|26 February 1969}} | | {{ayd|25 February 1968|26 February 1969}} | ||
| Loss of majority following withdrawal of support by Congress (R) led by Indira Gandhi. | | Loss of majority following withdrawal of support by Congress (R) led by Indira Gandhi.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=326–327}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 837: | Line 837: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|18 October 1970}} | | {{Date table sorting|18 October 1970}} | ||
| {{ayd|1 October 1970|18 October 1970}} | | {{ayd|1 October 1970|18 October 1970}} | ||
| Charan Singh Ministry supported by Congress collapsed following split in Congress party. | | [[Charan Singh]] Ministry supported by Congress collapsed following split in Congress party.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=338–341}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| Line 843: | Line 843: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|8 November 1973}} | | {{Date table sorting|8 November 1973}} | ||
| {{ayd|13 June 1973|8 November 1973}} | | {{ayd|13 June 1973|8 November 1973}} | ||
| Chief Minister resigned as a result of the [[1973 Provincial Armed Constabulary revolt]]. | | Chief Minister resigned as a result of the [[1973 Provincial Armed Constabulary revolt]].<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=44–45}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| Line 849: | Line 849: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|21 January 1976}} | | {{Date table sorting|21 January 1976}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 November 1975|21 January 1976}} | | {{ayd|30 November 1975|21 January 1976}} | ||
| Congress Government of H N Bahuguna tendered resignation due to infighting within the party. | | Congress Government of [[Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna|H N Bahuguna]] tendered resignation due to infighting within the party.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=369–370}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| Line 855: | Line 855: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|23 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|23 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 April 1977|23 June 1977}} | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|23 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of N D Tiwari enjoying majority support in Assembly. | | Government dismissed in spite of [[N. D. Tiwari|N D Tiwari]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
| Line 861: | Line 861: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|9 June 1980}} | | {{Date table sorting|9 June 1980}} | ||
| {{ayd|17 February 1980|9 June 1980}} | | {{ayd|17 February 1980|9 June 1980}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Banarasi Das enjoying majority support in Assembly. | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Banarasi Das]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
| Line 867: | Line 867: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|4 December 1993}} | | {{Date table sorting|4 December 1993}} | ||
| {{ayd|6 December 1992|4 December 1993}} | | {{ayd|6 December 1992|4 December 1993}} | ||
| Government dismissed in the aftermath of the destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan. | | Government dismissed in the aftermath of the destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan.<ref name=":5" /> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| Line 873: | Line 873: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|21 March 1997}} | | {{Date table sorting|21 March 1997}} | ||
| {{ayd|18 October 1995|21 March 1997}} | | {{ayd|18 October 1995|21 March 1997}} | ||
| Loss of majority following collapse of coalition followed by indecisive outcome of fresh elections. | | Loss of majority following collapse of coalition followed by indecisive outcome of fresh elections.<ref>Swami, Venkitesh (1 November 1997). [https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30160288.ece "A crisis defused"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240925223207/https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30160288.ece |date=25 September 2024 }}. ''[[The Hindu]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 9 | | 9 | ||
| Line 879: | Line 879: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|3 May 2002}} | | {{Date table sorting|3 May 2002}} | ||
| {{ayd|8 March 2002|3 May 2002}} | | {{ayd|8 March 2002|3 May 2002}} | ||
| Indecisive outcome of elections. | | Indecisive outcome of elections.<ref>Mishra, Subhash (18 March 2002). [https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/states/states-uttar-pradesh/story/20020318-imposition-of-presidents-rule-in-uttar-pradesh-comes-as-a-boon-to-political-parties-795741-2002-03-17 "Imposition of President's rule in Uttar Pradesh comes as a boon to political parties"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124134/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/states/states-uttar-pradesh/story/20020318-imposition-of-presidents-rule-in-uttar-pradesh-comes-as-a-boon-to-political-parties-795741-2002-03-17 |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[India Today]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/uttar-pradesh-put-under-presidents-rule/articleshow/3203812.cms "Uttar Pradesh put under President's rule"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124201/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/uttar-pradesh-put-under-presidents-rule/articleshow/3203812.cms |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Times of India]]''. 10 March 2002. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| rowspan="2"| [[Uttarakhand]] | | rowspan="2"| [[Uttarakhand]] | ||
| Line 886: | Line 886: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|21 April 2016}} | | {{Date table sorting|21 April 2016}} | ||
| {{ayd|27 March 2016|21 April 2016}} | | {{ayd|27 March 2016|21 April 2016}} | ||
| Collapse of CM [[Harish Rawat]]'s ministry following a split in the state unit of Congress party. In the hearing of related case, [[Uttarakhand High Court]] declared the president's rule imposition by the President unconstitutional and restored the Harish Rawat's led government in the state.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/arunachal-pradesh-verdict-nabam-tuki-harish-rawat-uttarakhand-president-rule-supreme-court-modi-government-2914435/ | title=Lessons from Uttarakhand and Arunachal: What court orders on Central rule say | access-date= 15 July 2016}}</ref> | | Collapse of CM [[Harish Rawat]]'s ministry following a split in the state unit of Congress party. In the hearing of related case, [[Uttarakhand High Court]] declared the president's rule imposition by the President unconstitutional and restored the Harish Rawat's led government in the state.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/arunachal-pradesh-verdict-nabam-tuki-harish-rawat-uttarakhand-president-rule-supreme-court-modi-government-2914435/ | title=Lessons from Uttarakhand and Arunachal: What court orders on Central rule say | date=15 July 2016 | access-date=15 July 2016 | archive-date=14 July 2016 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160714202920/http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/arunachal-pradesh-verdict-nabam-tuki-harish-rawat-uttarakhand-president-rule-supreme-court-modi-government-2914435/ | url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |-style="text-align:center" | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| Line 892: | Line 892: | ||
| {{Date table sorting|11 May 2016}} | | {{Date table sorting|11 May 2016}} | ||
| {{ayd|22 April 2016|11 May 2016}} | | {{ayd|22 April 2016|11 May 2016}} | ||
| Supreme Court of India held the stay on Uttarakhand High Court's verdict thus reinstating the president's rule in the state. | | Supreme Court of India held the stay on Uttarakhand High Court's verdict thus reinstating the president's rule in the state.<ref>Sinha, Bhadra (23 April 2016). [https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/sc-stays-uttarakhand-hc-order-which-set-aside-president-s-rule-in-state/story-eDJgkrLFdzLa5GBVeeeczK.html "SC stays Uttarakhand HC order which set aside President's Rule in state"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502224609/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/sc-stays-uttarakhand-hc-order-which-set-aside-president-s-rule-in-state/story-eDJgkrLFdzLa5GBVeeeczK.html |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Hindustan Times]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref><ref>Pandey, Sidharth (15 May 2016). Singh, Veer Arjun (ed.). [https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/uttarakhand-result-today-amid-early-celebrations-in-congress-1405033 "President's Rule Lifted From Uttarakhand, Congress Back In Power: 10 Points"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240613065340/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/uttarakhand-result-today-amid-early-celebrations-in-congress-1405033 |date=13 June 2024 }}. ''[[NDTV]]''. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|- style="text-align:center" | |||
| rowspan="4" |[[West Bengal]] | |||
| 1 | |||
|-style="text-align:center" | |||
| {{Date table sorting|20 February 1968}} | | {{Date table sorting|20 February 1968}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|25 February 1969}} | | {{Date table sorting|25 February 1969}} | ||
| {{ayd|20 February 1968|25 February 1969}} | | {{ayd|20 February 1968|25 February 1969}} | ||
| State placed under president's rule following collapse of two successive short lived coalition governments. | | State placed under president's rule following collapse of two successive short lived coalition governments.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19680221&printsec=frontpage&hl=en "President takes over West Bengal"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502122633/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=P9oYG7HA76QC&dat=19680221&printsec=frontpage&hl=en |date=2 May 2024 }}. ''[[Indian Express]]''. 21 February 1968. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.</ref> | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| | | 2 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|19 March 1970}} | | {{Date table sorting|19 March 1970}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|2 April 1971}} | | {{Date table sorting|2 April 1971}} | ||
| {{ayd|19 March 1970|2 April 1971}} | | {{ayd|19 March 1970|2 April 1971}} | ||
| Collapse of United Front Coalition between Bangla Congress and CPI(M) | | Collapse of [[United Front (West Bengal)|United Front]] Coalition between [[Bangla Congress]] and [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)|CPI(M)]].<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=336–340}} | ||
|-style="text-align:center" | |- style="text-align:center" | ||
| 3 | |||
| {{Date table sorting|29 June 1971}} | |||
| {{Date table sorting|20 March 1972}} | |||
| {{ayd|29 June 1971|20 March 1972}} | |||
| Collapse of Democratic Coalition following split in Bangla Congress.<ref name=":1" />{{Rp|pages=408–411}}<ref name=":0" />{{Rp|pages=401–403}} | |||
|- style="text-align:center" | |||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| {{Date table sorting|30 April 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|30 April 1977}} | ||
| {{Date table sorting|21 June 1977}} | | {{Date table sorting|21 June 1977}} | ||
| {{ayd|30 April 1977|21 June 1977}} | | {{ayd|30 April 1977|21 June 1977}} | ||
| Government dismissed in spite of Siddhartha Shankar Ray enjoying majority support in Assembly | | Government dismissed in spite of [[Siddhartha Shankar Ray]] enjoying majority support in Assembly.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /> | ||
|} | |} | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[Direct rule]] | * [[Direct rule]] | ||
* [[Federal intervention]] (A similar procedure used in [[Argentina]]) | * [[Federal intervention]] (A similar procedure used in [[Argentina]]) | ||
* [[Federalism in India]] | * [[Federalism in India]] | ||
* [[Part Eighteen of the Constitution of India]] | * [[Part Eighteen of the Constitution of India]] | ||
* [[ | * [[List of state governments dismissed by the Indian National Congress]] | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
| Line 947: | Line 931: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* [[s:Constitution of India/Part XVIII|Article 355 and 356 text from wikisource]] | * [[s:Constitution of India (2020)/Part XVIII|Article 355 and 356 text from wikisource]] | ||
* [http://www.ejcl.org/81/abs81-4.html Discusses the instances where presidents rule has been invoked] | * [http://www.ejcl.org/81/abs81-4.html Discusses the instances where presidents rule has been invoked] | ||
* [ | * [https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/761237/1/Presidents_Rule_in_St_UT_Eng_9th_ed_2016.pdf Lok Sabha Secretariat's report on President's Rule] | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:President's rule}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:President's rule}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:10, 4 February 2026
In India, President's rule is the suspension of state government and imposition of direct Union government rule in a state. Under Article 356 of the Constitution of India, if a state government is unable to function according to Constitutional provisions, the Union government can take direct control of the state machinery. Subsequently, executive authority is exercised through the centrally appointed governor, who has the authority to appoint other administrators to assist them. The administrators are usually nonpartisan retired civil servants not native to the state.
When a state government is functioning correctly, it is run by an elected Council of Ministers responsible to the state's legislative assembly (Vidhan Sabha). The council is led by the chief minister, who is the chief executive of the state; the Governor is only a constitutional head. However, during President's rule, the Council of Ministers is dissolved, later on vacating the office of Chief Minister. Furthermore, the Vidhan Sabha is either prorogued or dissolved, necessitating a new election.
Prior to 2019, the constitution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir had a similar system of Governor's rule, under its Section 92. The state's governor issued a proclamation, after obtaining the consent of the President of India allowing Governor's rule for up to six months after which President's rule under Article 356 of the Constitution of India could be imposed. After the revocation of Article 370, President's rule applies to Jammu and Kashmir under section 73 (since Article 356 of Constitution of India does not apply to union territories) of Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.
Following the 1994 landmark judgment in S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India restricted arbitrary impositions of President's rule.
Chhattisgarh and Telangana are the only states where the President's rule has never been imposed so far.[1]
Imposition in state[edit | edit source]
In practice, President's rule has been imposed in a State under any one of the following different circumstances:
- A state Assembly is unable to elect a leader as Chief Minister for a time prescribed by the Governor of that State, at the Will of Governor.
- Breakdown of a coalition leading to the Chief Minister not having majority support in the Assembly; and the Chief minister fails/will definitely fail to prove otherwise, within a time prescribed by the Governor of that state.
- Loss of majority in the Assembly due to a vote of no-confidence in the house.
- Elections postponed for unavoidable reasons like war, epidemic, pandemic or natural disasters.
- On the report of the Governor of the State that the State's constitutional machinery or legislature fails to abide by Constitutional norms.
If approved by both Houses, President's rule can continue for 6 months. It can be extended for a maximum of 3 years with the approval of the Parliament done every 6 months; however in extreme rare cases it can be extended repeatedly if the Election Commission of India recommends that elections are not possible. If the Lok Sabha is dissolved during this time, the rule is valid for 30 days from the first sitting of the new Lok Sabha provided that this continuance has already been approved by Rajya Sabha. The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 introduced a new provision to put a restraint on the power of Parliament to extend the President's rule in a state. According to this provision, the president's rule can only be extended over a year, under the following conditions:
- There is already a national emergency throughout India, or in the whole or any part of the state.
- The Election Commission certifies that elections cannot be conducted in the state.
President's rule can be revoked at any time by the President and does not need Parliament's approval.
Until the mid-1990s, President's rule was often imposed in states through the abuse of authority of Governors who were in collusion with the Union government. The Supreme Court of India in March 1994 established a precedent in S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, due to which such abuse has been drastically reduced.
Imposition in Union territories with a Legislative Assembly[edit | edit source]
Article 356 is not applicable to Union territories, so there are many ways by which President's rule can be imposed in different Union territories with a Legislative Assembly.
Jammu and Kashmir[edit | edit source]
Until the revocation of special status and bifurcation into two Union territories, President's rule applied after the application of Governor's rule under the erstwhile state's constitution for 6 months.
After the revocation and bifurcation, the reorganized union territory of Jammu and Kashmir is subject to the section 73 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019, which is used to impose President's rule as the Article 356 is not applicable to Union Territories. The provision states:
73. If the President, on receipt of a report from the Lieutenant Governor of Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, or otherwise, is satisfied,—
(a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Act, or
(b) that for the proper administration of Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir it is necessary or expedient so to do,
the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act for such period as he thinks fit and makes such incidental and consequential provisions as
may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
Delhi[edit | edit source]
In NCT of Delhi, President's rule is applied on the basis of Article 239AB of the Constitution of India (as the Article 356 is not applicable to Union Territories) which reads thus:
239AB. – If the President, on receipt of a report from the Lieutenant Governor or otherwise, is satisfied—
(a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the National Capital Territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of article 239AA or of any law made in pursuance of that article; or
(b) that for the proper administration of the National Capital Territory it is necessary or expedient so to do, the President may by order suspend the operation of any provision of Article 239AA or of all or any of the
provisions of any law made in pursuance of that article for such period and subject to such conditions as maybe specified in such law and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the National Capital Territory in accordance with the provisions of article 239 and article 239AA.
Puducherry[edit | edit source]
In the union territory of Puducherry, President's rule is applied on the basis of Article 51 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963.[2] Which thus reads
51. Provision in case of failure of constitutional machinery. — If the President, on receipt of a report from the Administrator of the Union territory or otherwise, is satisfied,―
(a) that a situation has arisen in which the administration of the Union territory cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Act, or
(b) that for the proper administration of the Union territory it is necessary or expedient so to do, the President may, by order, suspend the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act for such period as he thinks fit and make such incidental and consequential provisions as may appear to him to be necessary or expedient for administering the Union territory in accordance with the provisions of article 239.
Misuse and criticism[edit | edit source]
Article 356 gives wide powers to the Union government to assert its authority over a state if civil unrest occurs and the state government does not have the means to end it. Though the purpose of this article is to give more powers to the Union government to preserve the unity and integrity of the nation, it has often been misused by the ruling parties at the centre, who used it as a pretext to dissolve state governments ruled by political opponents.[3][4] Thus, it is seen by many as a threat to the federal state system. Since the adoption of the Indian constitution in 1950, the Union government has used this 134 times to dissolve elected state governments by imposing President's rule.[1]
The article was used for the first time in Punjab on 20 June 1951. It was next used in the state of Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU) in 1953, and then in 1959 to dismiss the Communist Party of India–led government in Kerala in the aftermath of anti-communist protests. In the 1970s and 1980s, it was common for the Union government to dismiss state governments led by opposition parties.[5] The Indira Gandhi regime and post-emergency Janata Party were noted for this practice. Indira Gandhi's government between 1966 and 1977 is known to have imposed President's rule 39 times in different states.[6] Similarly, the Janata Party which came to power after the emergency issued President's rule in 9 states which were ruled by Congress.[7][8]
The practice was limited only after the Supreme Court established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule in its ruling on the S. R. Bommai v. Union of India case in 1994. This landmark judgement has helped curtail the widespread abuse of Article 356. The judgement established strict guidelines for imposing President's rule. Subsequent pronouncements by the Supreme Court in Jharkhand and other states have further limited the scope for misuse of Article 356. Only since the early 2000s has the number of cases of imposition of President's rule has been drastically reduced.[9]
Article 356 has always been the focal point of a wider debate of the federal structure of government in Indian polity.[10] During debates in the Constituent Assembly of India regarding emergency provisions of the Constitution of India, B. R. Ambedkar argued for their inclusion under the assumption "that such articles will never be called into operation and that they would remain a dead letter".[11] The Sarkaria Commission Report on Centre-State Relations 1983 has recommended that Article 356 must be used "very sparingly, in extreme cases, as a measure of last resort, when all the other alternatives fail to prevent or rectify a breakdown of Constitutional machinery in the state".[12]
List of instances[edit | edit source]
| State | Term | Date of imposition | Date of revocation | Duration | Reason(s) to impose the President's rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andhra Pradesh | 1 | 18 January 1973 | 10 December 1973 | 327 days | Breakdown of law & order due to Jai Andhra Agitation, in CM P. V. Narasimha Rao's tenure.[13] |
| 2 | 1 March 2014 | 8 June 2014 | 99 days | Political impasse following the resignation of CM Kiran Kumar Reddy and several other congress party legislators from the Government as well as the Party, in protest against Indian Parliament passing Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Bill to bifurcate united Andhra Pradesh and create a separate Telangana state.[14] President's rule revoked from Telangana areas on 2 June 2014 and bifurcated Andhra Pradesh areas on 8 June 2014.[15] President rule reimposed unlawfully by the President after the two months time limit without taking approval of the Parliament under Article 356.[16][17] | |
| Andhra State | 1 | 15 November 1954 | 28 March 1955 | 133 days | Loss of majority.[18][19](pp127–133) |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 1 | 3 November 1979 | 18 January 1980 | 76 days | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment during Janata party rule at the centre.[20] |
| 2 | 25 January 2016 | 19 February 2016 | 26 days | 21 Congress MLAs joined hands with 11 of the BJP and two Independents, making the contemporary government a minority.[21] Supreme Court declared the imposition of president rule as ultra vires and reinstated the dismissed Congress led government in the state. In a landmark judgement, it found fault with the unconstitutional role played by the Governor by interfering in the activities of legislatures and speaker of the Vidhan Sabha[22] | |
| Assam | 1 | 12 December 1979 | 6 December 1980 | 360 days | 'Assam Agitation' against illegal foreign nationals staying in Assam started to take roots under the leadership of the All Assam Students' Union (AASU). The violence fuelled by United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) resulted in breakdown of law and order.[23]:[24]: |
| 2 | 30 June 1981 | 13 January 1982 | 197 days | Congress (I) government led by Anwara Taimur representing immigrant minorities collapsed following intensification of 'Assam Agitation' against illegal foreign national staying in Assam.[25] | |
| 3 | 19 March 1982 | 27 February 1983 | 345 days | Congress (I) government led by Kesab Gogoi representing ethnic Asom people collapsed following continued violence in Assam.[26] | |
| 4 | 28 November 1990 | 30 June 1991 | 214 days | Government dismissed in spite of AGP CM Prafulla Mahanta enjoying majority support in Assembly. The dismissal was triggered apparently by the threat to internal security due to banned organisation ULFA's activities.[27] During the president's rule, Operation Bajrang was launched to flush out ULFA militants.[28] | |
| Bihar | 1 | 29 June 1968 | 26 February 1969 | 242 days | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment.[29](pp116–117)[19](pp300–301) |
| 2 | 4 July 1969 | 16 February 1970 | 227 days | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment due to split in ruling Congress party[29](pp123–125)[19](pp321–326) | |
| 3 | 9 January 1972 | 19 March 1972 | 70 days | Loss of majority following defections in a fluid political environment.[29](pp129–130) | |
| 4 | 30 April 1977 | 24 June 1977 | 55 days | Government dismissed in spite of Jagannath Mishra enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] | |
| 5 | 17 February 1980 | 8 June 1980 | 112 days | Government dismissed in spite of Ram Sundar Das enjoying majority support in Assembly.[30] | |
| 6 | 28 March 1995 | 4 April 1995 | 7 days | President's rule imposed for a brief period of one week to facilitate passage of vote on account (to permit day-to-day government expenses in Bihar) by Parliament while awaiting the results of Assembly elections held during the Chief Ministership of Lalu Prasad.[31] | |
| 7 | 12 February 1999 | 8 March 1999 | 24 days | Breakdown of law and order, killings of 11 Dalits at Narayanpur. The Vajpayee Government, revoked the president's rule within 26 days since the coalition did not have a majority in the Rajya Sabha.[32] | |
| 8 | 7 March 2005 | 24 November 2005 | 262 days | Indecisive outcome of elections. In a landmark judgement, Supreme Court ruled that the imposition of the president's rule without giving the chance to the elected legislatures to form new government is unconstitutional and mala fide act by the president.[33] | |
| Delhi | 1 | 16 February 2014 | 14 February 2015 | 363 days | Arvind Kejriwal resigned as Chief Minister after failing to table the Jan Lokpal Bill in the Delhi Assembly.[34] |
| Goa | 1 | 14 December 1990 | 25 January 1991 | 42 days | C.M. resigned consequent upon his disqualification by High Court – No other Government found viable.[35] |
| 2 | 10 February 1999 | 9 June 1999 | 119 days | Loss of majority and no alternate claimant to form next government.[36] | |
| 3 | 4 March 2005 | 7 June 2005 | 95 days | Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Pratap Sinh Rane.[37][38] | |
| Goa, Daman and Diu | 1 | 3 December 1966 | 5 April 1967 | 123 days | The Union Territory of Goa's Assembly was dissolved to conduct an opinion poll to determine whether Goa should be merged with Maharashtra.[39]: |
| 2 | 27 April 1979 | 16 January 1980 | 264 days | Loss of majority following split in the ruling MGP Party.[40] | |
| Gujarat | 1 | 13 May 1971 | 17 March 1972 | 309 days | Loss of majority following vertical split in Congress during 1969 presidential election.[29](pp138–140) |
| 2 | 9 February 1974 | 18 June 1975 | 1 year, 129 days | Chimanbhai Patel led Congress government resigned due to Navnirman Movement Anti-Corruption protests. The protesters forced MLA's resignations, forcing dissolution of assembly.[41] | |
| 3 | 12 March 1976 | 24 December 1976 | 287 days | "Non-Passage" of budget leading to collapse of government.[42] | |
| 4 | 17 February 1980 | 7 June 1980 | 111 days | Government dismissed in spite of Babubhai J Patel enjoying majority support in the Assembly[30] | |
| 5 | 19 September 1996 | 23 October 1996 | 34 days | Government dismissed following a controversial confidence vote. The Assembly was placed in suspended animation, which led to subsequent installation of Vaghela government, supported by Congress.[43] | |
| Haryana | 1 | 2 November 1967 | 21 May 1968 | 182 days | Government dismissed in spite of having a tenuous majority.[19](pp153-155) |
| 2 | 30 April 1977 | 21 June 1977 | 52 days | Government dismissed in spite of B D Gupta enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] | |
| 3 | 6 April 1991 | 23 June 1991 | 78 days | Rebellion in the ruling party.[44] | |
| Himachal Pradesh | 1 | 30 April 1977 | 22 June 1977 | 53 days | Government dismissed in spite of Thakur Ram Lal enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] |
| 2 | 15 December 1992 | 3 December 1993 | 353 days | Government dismissed in the aftermath of the destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan in Uttar Pradesh.[45] | |
| Jammu and Kashmir (State) |
1 | 27 March 1977 | 9 July 1977 | 104 days | Sheikh Abdullah led National Conference government bowed out after being reduced to a minority following withdrawal of support by the Congress Party.[29](pp431-432) |
| 2 | 7 March 1986 | 6 November 1986 | 244 days | Loss of majority.[46] | |
| 3 | 19 January 1990 | 9 October 1996 | 6 years, 264 days | Increased Militancy, Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus & breakdown of law & order[47] | |
| 5 | 10 July 2008 | 5 January 2009 | 179 days | Loss of majority following collapse of coalition. CM Gulam Nabi Azad's decision to transfer land for Amarnath pilgrimage led to PDP pulling out of coalition Govt.[48] | |
| 6 | 9 January 2015 | 1 March 2015 | 51 days | Failure of Government formation after fractured verdict in Assembly elections. BJP & PDP reached an understanding to form an alliance to form Government in J&K.[49] | |
| 7 | 8 January 2016 | 4 April 2016 | 87 days | Death of chief minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed.[50] | |
| 8 | 19 June 2018 | 30 October 2019 | 1 year, 133 days | Resignation of the Chief Minister following loss of coalition partner.[51] On 31 October 2019, Jammu and Kashmir state was split into two union territories, UT of Jammu and Kashmir and UT of Ladakh. | |
| Jammu and Kashmir (Union Territory) |
1 | 31 October 2019 | 13 October 2024 | 4 years, 348 days | Imposed under section 73 of Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (Article 356 does not apply to Union Territories) |
| Jharkhand | 1 | 19 January 2009 | 30 December 2009 | 345 days | Political instability due to CM Shibu Soren's resignation following defeat in Tamar bypolls.[52] |
| 2 | 1 June 2010 | 11 September 2010 | 102 days | Loss of majority.[53] | |
| 3 | 18 January 2013 | 13 July 2013 | 176 days | Loss of majority BJP's ruling coalition partner JMM withdrew its support to the government pushing it into a minority. Chief Minister Arjun Munda resigned and sought dissolution of the state Assembly.[54] | |
| Karnataka | 1 | 27 March 1971 | 20 March 1972 | 359 days | Loss of majority.[19](pp392, 395–396) |
| 2 | 31 December 1977 | 27 February 1978 | 58 days | Government dismissed in spite of Congress CM Devraj Urs enjoying majority support in Assembly.[19](pp221–225) | |
| 3 | 21 April 1989 | 30 November 1989 | 223 days | Loss of majority of CM S. R. Bommai, followed by dissolution of Assembly.[55] On an appeal by S. R. Bommai, in a landmark judgement delivered in 1994, the Indian Supreme Court laid out the procedure to be followed before dissolving an elected assembly. The historic ruling in this case reduced the scope for misuse of Article 356 by future central governments and governors. | |
| 4 | 10 October 1990 | 17 October 1990 | 7 days | Government of Veerendra Patil dismissed by Prime Minister V. P. Singh and state was placed under president's rule with the assembly placed in suspended animation until next chief Minister was elected.[56] | |
| 5 | 9 October 2007 | 12 November 2007 | 34 days | Loss of majority.[57][58] | |
| 6 | 20 November 2007 | 30 May 2008 | 192 days | Loss of majority.[59] | |
| Kerala | 1 | 31 July 1959 | 22 February 1960 | 206 days | Government dismissed in spite of Communist CM EMS Namboodiripad enjoying majority support in Assembly.[60][61] |
| 2 | 10 September 1964 | 6 March 1967 | 2 years, 177 days | Loss of majority followed by indecisive outcome of elections.[29](pp173–174)[19](pp214–215) | |
| 3 | 4 August 1970 | 3 October 1970 | 60 days | Loss of majority.[29](pp194–195) | |
| 4 | 5 December 1979 | 25 January 1980 | 51 days | Loss of majority.[62] | |
| 5 | 21 October 1981 | 28 December 1981 | 68 days | Loss of majority due to withdrawal of support by Congress(S) and Kerala Congress(M).[63][64] | |
| 6 | 17 March 1982 | 24 May 1982 | 68 days | Loss of majority following defection of Lonappan Nambadan.[65][66]: | |
| Madhya Pradesh | 1 | 30 April 1977 | 23 June 1977 | 54 days | Government dismissed in spite of Shyama Charan Shukla enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] |
| 2 | 17 February 1980 | 9 June 1980 | 113 days | Government dismissed in spite of Sundar Lal Patwa enjoying majority support in Assembly.[30] | |
| 3 | 15 December 1992 | 7 December 1993 | 357 days | Govt. dismissed in the aftermath of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan destruction in Uttar Pradesh.[45] | |
| Maharashtra | 1 | 17 February 1980 | 9 June 1980 | 113 days | Govt. dismissed in spite of Sharad Pawar enjoying majority support in the Assembly.[30] |
| 2 | 28 September 2014 | 31 October 2014 | 33 days | Govt. dismissed since Congress Separated from its allies NCP and Others.[67] | |
| 3 | 12 November 2019 | 23 November 2019 | 11 days | No party could form a government after a fractured election verdict and Shiv Sena broke the pre-poll alliance it had with the BJP.[68] See also: 2019 Maharashtra political crisis. | |
| Manipur | 1 | 25 October 1967 | 19 February 1968 | 117 days | Short lived ministry collapsed following resignation of speaker, resulting in neither ruling nor opposition congress having a clear majority in the assembly. Assembly kept in suspended animation.[69] |
| 2 | 16 October 1969 | 20 March 1972 | 2 years, 156 days | Violent secessionist insurgency and statehood demands resulted in breakdown of law and order.[29](pp206–207) | |
| 3 | 28 March 1973 | 4 March 1974 | 341 days | President's rule was imposed even though the opposition had a "tenuous" majority and could have formed a government.[29](pp208-209) | |
| 4 | 16 May 1977 | 26 June 1977 | 41 days | Collapse of Government following defections.[70][29](pp213–214) | |
| 5 | 14 November 1979 | 13 January 1980 | 60 days | Discontent within Janata Party Government and corruption charges led to dismissal of government and dissolution of Assembly.[71]: | |
| 6 | 28 February 1981 | 19 June 1981 | 111 days | Incumbent Government fell following defections. Governor did not permit an alternate government to be formed by People's Democratic Front on the basis of his assessment regarding stability of the proposed ministry.[72] | |
| 7 | 7 January 1992 | 8 April 1992 | 92 days | Incumbent coalition Government fell following defections. president's rule imposed keeping assembly in suspension.[73] | |
| 8 | 31 December 1993 | 13 December 1994 | 347 days | 1000 persons died in Naga-Kuki clashes and continued violence.[74] | |
| 9 | 2 June 2001 | 5 March 2002 | 276 days | Loss of majority.[75] | |
| 10 | 13 February 2025 | 3 February 2026 | 355 days | Chief Minister N. Biren Singh resigned following the 2023–2025 Manipur violence amidst a crisis of possible no-confidence motion. Assembly put under suspended animation.[76]
Chief Minister Yumnam Khemchand Singh appointed new CM & President’s rule finally lifted after nearly 1 year.[76] | |
| Meghalaya | 1 | 11 October 1991 | 5 February 1992 | 117 days | The Centre imposed president's rule in Meghalaya in the wake of a political crisis after the then Speaker PR Kyndiah suspended five MLAs, mostly independents, on grounds of defection.[77][78] |
| 2 | 19 March 2009 | 13 May 2009 | 56 days | Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Donkupar Roy.[79] | |
| Mizoram | 1 | 11 May 1977 | 2 June 1978 | 1 year, 22 days | Mizo Union Ministry led by Chief Minister Chhunga resigned in May 1977, ostensibly to facilitate the progress of peace talks.[80]:95 |
| 2 | 11 November 1978 | 8 May 1979 | 178 days | Chief Minister Sailo's refusal to grant undue favours caused dissension in his party which led to the fall of his government and imposition of president's rule.[80]:96–97 | |
| 3 | 7 September 1988 | 24 January 1989 | 139 days | Defections reduced the Government to minority.[81] | |
| Nagaland | 1 | 22 March 1975 | 25 November 1977 | 2 years, 248 days | Defections and counter defections led to imposition of president's rule.[29](pp230-231) |
| 2 | 7 August 1988 | 25 January 1989 | 171 days | The state was under a brief spell of central rule again after the Hokishe Sema-led Congress government was reduced to a minority.[82] The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court in held to be invalid in 1994. | |
| 3 | 2 April 1992 | 22 February 1993 | 326 days | Fluid party position and deteriorating law and order situation.[83] | |
| 4 | 3 January 2008 | 12 March 2008 | 69 days | Government dismissed after controversial confidence vote secured in the Assembly by CM Neiphiu Rio.[84][85] | |
| Odisha | 1 | 25 February 1961 | 23 June 1961 | 118 days | Harekrishna Mahtab led Congress-Gantantra Parishad Minority Government resigned on 21 February 1961 due to differences in the Congress Party. President's rule was imposed on 25 February 1961.[86] |
| 2 | 11 January 1971 | 3 April 1971 | 82 days | Break-up of coalition.[29](pp239–244) | |
| 3 | 3 March 1973 | 6 March 1974 | 1 year, 3 days | Facing imminent collapse of government, incumbent chief minister recommended dissolution of assembly and fresh elections.[29](pp245–247) | |
| 4 | 16 December 1976 | 29 December 1976 | 13 days | Chief Minister Nandini Satpathy was forced out and assembly placed under suspended animation. A new Congress government was sworn in after revocation of president's rule.[87] | |
| 5 | 30 April 1977 | 26 June 1977 | 57 days | Government dismissed in spite of Binayak Acharya enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] | |
| 6 | 17 February 1980 | 9 June 1980 | 113 days | Government dismissed in spite of Nilamani Routray enjoying majority support in Assembly.[30] | |
| Patiala and East Punjab States Union | 1 | 4 March 1953 | 7 March 1954 | 1 year, 3 days | President's rule was invoked in the erstwhile PEPSU (Patiala and East Punjab States Union ) State when the Akali Dal government, led by Gian Singh Rarewala, was dismissed.[88][89] |
| Puducherry | 1 | 18 September 1968 | 17 March 1969 | 180 days | Assembly was dissolved and president's rule imposed as opposition parties had a chance to form a government after the fall of the Congress government.[90][29](pp269–270) |
| 2 | 3 January 1974 | 6 March 1974 | 62 days | Assembly dissolved after fall of DMK government following decision of two ministers to join newly formed AIADMK.[29](pp271–272) | |
| 3 | 28 March 1974 | 2 July 1977 | 3 years, 96 days | Fall of coalition government of AIADMK, Congress(O) following division of votes by Congress(R) and DMK. The Assembly was dissolved.[29](pp272–274) | |
| 4 | 12 November 1978 | 16 January 1980 | 1 year, 65 days | Fall of government due to political instability.[91] | |
| 5 | 24 June 1983 | 16 March 1985 | 1 year, 265 days | Government dismissed following withdrawal of Congress(I) from coalition government. In spite of incumbent chief minister asking for an opportunity to prove his majority on the floor of the house, the assembly was dissolved.[92] | |
| 6 | 12 January 1991 | 4 July 1991 | 173 days | DMK Government dismissed in spite of having a majority in the Assembly.[93][94] | |
| 7 | 25 February 2021 | 7 May 2021 | 71 days | Congress Government resigned due to loss of majority and no alternate claimant to form next government.[95] | |
| Punjab | 1 | 20 June 1951 | 17 April 1952 | 302 days | Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru kept the Punjab Assembly in suspension for nine months and 28 days to help the state Congress government get its act together.[96] |
| 2 | 5 July 1966 | 1 November 1966 | 119 days | State administration was taken over, ostensibly to facilitate bifurcation of Punjab state into two, Punjab and Haryana.[29](pp282–283) | |
| 3 | 23 August 1968 | 17 February 1969 | 178 days | Break-up of coalition.[29](pp286–287) | |
| 4 | 15 June 1971 | 17 March 1972 | 276 days | Following poor performance in March, 1971 Lok Sabha Elections, incumbent Chief Minister advised dissolving state assembly and holding fresh elections to state legislature.[97] | |
| 5 | 30 April 1977 | 20 June 1977 | 51 days | Government dismissed in spite of Giani Zail Singh enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] | |
| 6 | 17 February 1980 | 7 June 1980 | 111 days | Government dismissed in spite of Parkash Singh Badal enjoying majority support in Assembly.[30] | |
| 7 | 6 October 1983 | 29 September 1985 | 1 year, 358 days | Many Khalistani separatist groups announced the creation of Khalistan.[98] | |
| 8 | 11 May 1987 | 23 February 1992 | 4 years, 288 days | Breakdown of law and order by several militant groups.[99] | |
| Rajasthan | 1 | 13 March 1967 | 26 April 1967 | 44 days | Indecisive outcome of elections.[19](pp281, 285–287) |
| 2 | 30 April 1977 | 22 June 1977 | 53 days | Government dismissed in spite of Hari Dev Joshi enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] | |
| 3 | 17 February 1980 | 5 June 1980 | 109 days | Government dismissed in spite of Bhairon Singh Shekhawat enjoying majority support in Assembly.[30] | |
| 4 | 15 December 1992 | 4 December 1993 | 354 days | Government dismissed in spite of Bhairon Singh Shekhawat enjoying majority support in Assembly.[45] | |
| Sikkim | 1 | 18 August 1978 | 17 October 1979 | 1 year, 60 days | Loss of majority following split in Kazi Lhendup Dorji led Janata Party government. The central government imposed president's rule and followed up with electoral reforms before ordering fresh elections.[100]: |
| 2 | 25 May 1984 | 8 March 1985 | 287 days | Congress Government formed following induced collapse of Nar Bahadur Bhandari Sikkim Janata Parishad Government was dismissed as it did not enjoy a majority in the Assembly.[101][102]: | |
| Tamil Nadu | 1 | 31 January 1976 | 30 June 1977 | 1 year, 150 days | The government headed by former chief minister M. Karunanidhi was dismissed by former prime minister Indira Gandhi in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly, due to charges of corruption while the Sarkaria Commission was set up to probe the allegations.[103] |
| 2 | 17 February 1980 | 9 June 1980 | 113 days | The government headed by former chief minister M. G. Ramachandran was dismissed by former prime minister Indira Gandhi in spite enjoying majority in the legislative assembly.[30] | |
| 3 | 30 January 1988 | 27 January 1989 | 363 days | The government headed by former chief minister V. N. Janaki Ramachandran was dismissed by former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi after controversial confidence vote secured by her in the legislative assembly.[104] | |
| 4 | 30 January 1991 | 24 June 1991 | 145 days | The government headed by former chief minister M. Karunanidhi was dismissed by former prime minister Chandra Shekhar on charges of supporting anti-national activities, in spite of the governor Surjit Singh Barnala's report and enjoying majority in the legislative assembly.[105] | |
| Travancore-Cochin | 1 | 23 March 1956 | 5 April 1957 | 1 year, 13 days | Loss of majority following split in Congress Party.[106](pp33–35) |
| Tripura | 1 | 1 November 1971 | 20 March 1972 | 140 days | In the backdrop of refugee influx due to Bangladesh Liberation War, split in the Congress and Communist agitation for Tripura to become a full-fledged state, president's rule was imposed. On 1 January 1972 Tripura became a State and assembly elections held subsequently.[29](p320) |
| 2 | 5 November 1977 | 4 January 1978 | 60 days | Collapse of short lived government in a fluid political environment.[29](p322) | |
| 3 | 11 March 1993 | 10 April 1993 | 30 days | Elections postponed from 15 February 1993 to 3 April 1993 on account of deteriorating law and order situation. Caretaker CM resigns.[107] | |
| Uttar Pradesh | 1 | 25 February 1968 | 26 February 1969 | 1 year, 1 day | Loss of majority following withdrawal of support by Congress (R) led by Indira Gandhi.[29](pp326–327) |
| 2 | 1 October 1970 | 18 October 1970 | 17 days | Charan Singh Ministry supported by Congress collapsed following split in Congress party.[29](pp338–341) | |
| 3 | 13 June 1973 | 8 November 1973 | 148 days | Chief Minister resigned as a result of the 1973 Provincial Armed Constabulary revolt.[29](pp44–45) | |
| 4 | 30 November 1975 | 21 January 1976 | 52 days | Congress Government of H N Bahuguna tendered resignation due to infighting within the party.[29](pp369–370) | |
| 5 | 30 April 1977 | 23 June 1977 | 54 days | Government dismissed in spite of N D Tiwari enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] | |
| 6 | 17 February 1980 | 9 June 1980 | 113 days | Government dismissed in spite of Banarasi Das enjoying majority support in Assembly.[30] | |
| 7 | 6 December 1992 | 4 December 1993 | 363 days | Government dismissed in the aftermath of the destruction of Babri Masjid-Ram Janmasthan.[45] | |
| 8 | 18 October 1995 | 21 March 1997 | 1 year, 154 days | Loss of majority following collapse of coalition followed by indecisive outcome of fresh elections.[108] | |
| 9 | 8 March 2002 | 3 May 2002 | 56 days | Indecisive outcome of elections.[109][110] | |
| Uttarakhand | 1 | 27 March 2016 | 21 April 2016 | 25 days | Collapse of CM Harish Rawat's ministry following a split in the state unit of Congress party. In the hearing of related case, Uttarakhand High Court declared the president's rule imposition by the President unconstitutional and restored the Harish Rawat's led government in the state.[111] |
| 2 | 22 April 2016 | 11 May 2016 | 19 days | Supreme Court of India held the stay on Uttarakhand High Court's verdict thus reinstating the president's rule in the state.[112][113] | |
| West Bengal | 1 | 20 February 1968 | 25 February 1969 | 1 year, 5 days | State placed under president's rule following collapse of two successive short lived coalition governments.[114] |
| 2 | 19 March 1970 | 2 April 1971 | 1 year, 14 days | Collapse of United Front Coalition between Bangla Congress and CPI(M).[19](pp336–340) | |
| 3 | 29 June 1971 | 20 March 1972 | 265 days | Collapse of Democratic Coalition following split in Bangla Congress.[29](pp408–411)[19](pp401–403) | |
| 4 | 30 April 1977 | 21 June 1977 | 52 days | Government dismissed in spite of Siddhartha Shankar Ray enjoying majority support in Assembly.[7][8] |
See also[edit | edit source]
- Direct rule
- Federal intervention (A similar procedure used in Argentina)
- Federalism in India
- Part Eighteen of the Constitution of India
- List of state governments dismissed by the Indian National Congress
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Das, Anjishnu (29 August 2023). "13 years in J&K, 10 times in Manipur, UP: History of President's Rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Ministry of Law and Justice, Legislative Department (1963). Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (PDF). New Delhi: Authority. p. 34. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2021.
- ↑ "Limitations of Article 356". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 19 September 2003.
- ↑ Bhardwaj, Ashutosh; Sinha, Amitabh; Mohanty, Debabrata (29 March 2016). "Over 100 blows old, Article 356 is a hammer that all govts love". Indian Express. Archived from the original on 4 May 2024. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
- ↑ "Sarkaria Commission Report – Chapter VI : Emergency Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 August 2014. Retrieved 28 September 2014.
- ↑ Harriss, John (2010). "Political change, political structure, and the Indian state since Independence". In Brass, Paul R. (ed.). Routledge Handbook of South Asian Politics: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal (ebook ed.). Routledge. pp. 55–66. doi:10.4324/9780203878187. ISBN 978-0-203-87818-7. Archived from the original on 25 September 2024. Retrieved 2 May 2024 – via Google Books. p. 61:
... Article 356, authorizing "President's Rule," through which governments at the centre have regularly dissolved state governments ... Indira Gandhi used this instrument 39 times between 1966 and 1977
. - ↑ 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 Borders, William (1 May 1977). "Constitutional Conflict Ends in India as Acting President Accepts Order Dissolving Nine State Legislatures" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. New York Times. p. 4. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ 8.00 8.01 8.02 8.03 8.04 8.05 8.06 8.07 8.08 8.09 Tummala, Krishna K. (October 1996). "The Indian Union and Emergency Powers". International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique. 17 (4, New Trends in Federalism / Les nouvelles formes du fédéralisme): 373–384. doi:10.1177/019251296017004003. JSTOR 1601275.
- ↑ Vishwanath, Apurva (12 December 2023). "What was the SR Bommai judgment, which the SC relied on in its Article 370 ruling?". Indian Express. Archived from the original on 4 May 2024. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
- ↑ "National Commission to Review the Working of the Article 356 of the constitution". 2001. Archived from the original on 9 May 2015. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
- ↑ "Constituent Assembly Debates, Volume 9: 04 August 1949". ConstitutionofIndia.net. Bengaluru: Centre for Law and Policy Research. Articles 188, 277-A and 278-contd., sec. 9.111.49. Archived from the original on 4 May 2024. Retrieved 22 June 2025.
- ↑ "Sarkaria Commission Report – Chapter VI: Emergency Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 August 2014. Retrieved 28 September 2014.
- ↑ Narayana Rao, K. V. (August 1977). "Mulki agitation in the Telangana and Andhra regions". Internal migration policies in an Indian state: A study of the Mulki rules in Hyderabad and Andhra Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine (PDF). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Center for International Studies. p. 63. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's Rule imposed in Andhra Pradesh under Article 356 of Constitution". IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Archived from the original on 18 April 2014. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
- ↑ "Andhra Pradesh mired in President rule imbroglio". The Times of India. 19 April 2014. Archived from the original on 6 July 2014. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
- ↑ "Re-proclamation of President rule in Andhra Pradesh" (PDF). 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2014. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
- ↑ "Andhra Pradesh mired in President rule imbroglio". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 6 July 2014. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
- ↑ "When Centre stepped in" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 17 March 1970. p. 7. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ 19.00 19.01 19.02 19.03 19.04 19.05 19.06 19.07 19.08 19.09 Dua, Bhagwan D. (Spring 1977). Presidential rule in India: A study in crisis politics (PhD thesis). University of Alberta. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Chawla, Prabhu (30 November 1979). "President's rule brings to an end political melodrama in Arunachal Pradesh" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "It's against Constitution: Politicians react to Prez rule in Arunachal". Hindustan Times. 25 January 2016. Archived from the original on 26 January 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
- ↑ "After Arunachal Pradesh debacle, PM Modi must abolish post of governor". 14 July 2016. Archived from the original on 17 July 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
- ↑ Baruah, Sanjib (November 1986). "Immigration, Ethnic Conflict, and Political Turmoil—Assam, 1979–1985". Asian Survey. 26 (11): 1184–1206. doi:10.2307/2644315. JSTOR 2644315.
- ↑ Darnell, Alfred T.; Parikh, Sunita (July 1988). "Religion, ethnicity, and the role of the state: Explaining conflict in Assam". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 11 (3): 263–281. doi:10.1080/01419870.1988.9993604.
- ↑ Sen, Sumanta (31 July 1981). "Assam set for another spell of political uncertainty after fall of Congress(I) ministry" Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Sen, Sumanta (15 April 1982). "Assam: Congress(I) ministry led by Keshab Gogoi falls, President's Rule to return" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024
- ↑ Sengupta, Uttam (15 December 1990). "Assam crisis puts government in catch-22 situation" Archived 3 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Ahmed, Farzand (31 March 1991). "Three months after army moved in, Operation Bajrang makes little headway and ULFA remains potent force" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ 29.00 29.01 29.02 29.03 29.04 29.05 29.06 29.07 29.08 29.09 29.10 29.11 29.12 29.13 29.14 29.15 29.16 29.17 29.18 29.19 29.20 29.21 29.22 29.23 29.24 Siwach, J. R. (1979). Politics of President's Rule in India Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study. OCLC 7583232. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 30.5 30.6 30.7 30.8 Louis, Arul B.; Chawla, Prabhu (15 March 1980). "PM Indira Gandhi dismisses governments in nine states, looks to put Congress in power" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Ahmed, Farzand (15 April 1995). "Stand-off between T. N. Seshan and Laloo Prasad Yadav leaves trail of woes for common man" Archived 3 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Zarhani, Seyedhossein (December 2015). Dynamics of Governance and Development in India: A Comparative Study on Andhra Pradesh and Bihar after 1990 Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine (PDF) (PhD thesis). Heidelberg University. pp. 186–187. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Rameshwar Prasad And Ors vs Union Of India And Anr on 24 January, 2006". Archived from the original on 16 October 2010. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
- ↑ Kumar, Devesh (17 February 2014). "President's Rule imposed in Delhi after Arvind Kejriwal's resignation" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. NDTV. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Rahman, M. (15 January 1991). "Polls only solution for confused Goa assembly" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Abreu, Robin (22 February 1999). "Credible rule becomes a thing of the past in Goa" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Sharma, Ravi (1 July 2005). "Another government in Goa" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Frontline. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Goa Cong accept President's Rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Times of India. 5 March 2005. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Rubinoff, Arthur G. (May 1992). "Goa's Attainment of Statehood". Asian Survey. 32 (5): 471–487. doi:10.2307/2644978. JSTOR 2644978.
- ↑ Panchal, Chinu (31 May 1979). "Shashikala Kakodkar toppled from chief ministership of Goa by Babu Naik" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Guha, Ramachandra (2007). "The Rivals". India after Gandhi: The history of the world's largest democracy. New York: HarperCollins. p. 476. ISBN 978-0-230-01654-5. OCLC 77012193. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Janta Front govt in Gujarat suffers a two vote defeat" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. 31 March 1976. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Going by the book, read anew, but large issues remain" Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Frontline. 1 November 1997. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Haryana placed under President's rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 7 April 1991. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 45.3 "Three BJP govts dismissed" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 16 December 1992. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Dubey, Suman (31 March 1986). "Congress(I) withdraws support from G.M. Shah govt, paves way for governor's rule in J&K" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Jammu & Kashmir under Governor's rule for eighth time". India Today. 20 June 2018. Archived from the original on 11 August 2023. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ↑ Ganguly, Sumit (7 May 2009). "Slow learning: lessons from India's counterinsurgency operations in Kashmir". In Fidler, David P.; Ganguly, Sumit (eds.). India and Counterinsurgency: Lessons Learned. New York: Taylor & Francis. p. 87. ISBN 978-1-134-00809-4. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Kumar, Vinay (9 January 2015). "Governor's rule in J&K". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 5 June 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2018 – via www.thehindu.com.
- ↑ Ashiq, Peerzada (1 April 2016). "Mehbooba to be sworn in as J&K's first woman CM on April 4" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. The Hindu. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Mehbooba Mufti resigns after BJP pulls out of alliance with PDP in Jammu and Kashmir". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 9 November 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- ↑ "President's rule imposed in Jharkhand" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. The Economic Times. 19 January 2009. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's rule in Jharkhand" Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. The Hindu. 1 June 2010. Retrieved 1 June 2010.
- ↑ "Jharkhand put under President's rule again". Hindustan Times. Press Trust of India. 18 January 2013. Archived from the original on 18 January 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
- ↑ Rajghatta, Chidanand; Chawla, Prabhu (15 May 1989). "Janata Dal government in Karnataka falls, Governor Venkatasubbiah's role faces severe flak" Archived 25 September 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Kumar, Yeshwanth; Awasthi, Dilip (31 October 1990). "Spate of communal violence hits Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh" Archived 3 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's rule imposed in Karnataka" Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. 10 October 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's rule in Karnataka revoked" Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Times of India. 8 November 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Karnataka again under President's rule" Archived 3 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Hindustan Times. 20 November 2007. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Jeffrey, Robin (March 1991). "Jawaharlal Nehru and the smoking gun: Who pulled the trigger on Kerala's communist government in 1959?". The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 29 (1): 72–85. doi:10.1080/14662049108447602.
- ↑ Shefi, A. E. (December 2019). "Vimochana Samaram and First Communist Ministry in Kerala: A Historical Analysis". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 80 (published 2022): 1150–1158. JSTOR 27192970.
- ↑ Kartha, G. S. (31 December 1979). "Political instability brings Kerala under President's rule again for fourth time" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Varkey, Ouseph (2019) [first published by Westview Press in 1984]. "The Rise and Decline of the Left and Democratic Front in Kerala". In Wood, John R. (ed.). State Politics In Contemporary India: Crisis Or Continuity? (ebook ed.). Routledge. pp. 109–118. doi:10.4324/9780429307454. ISBN 978-0-429-30745-4.
- ↑ Revocation of the Proclamation made by the President on the 21st October, 1981, in relation to the State of Kerala under article 356 of the Constitution. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs. 1981. p. 11. Archived from the original on 13 June 2024. Retrieved 4 May 2024 – via National Archives of India.
- ↑ Mehar, Rakesh; Balan, Saritha S. (19 June 2017). "Kerala Chronicles: How an Assembly Speaker kept a Congress govt afloat for 3 months in 1982". The News Minute. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
- ↑ Kamath, P. M. (October 1985). "Politics of Defection in India in the 1980s". Asian Survey. 25 (10): 1039–1054. doi:10.2307/2644180. JSTOR 2644180.
- ↑ "President's rule imposed in Maharashtra" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Times of India. 28 September 2014. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Singh, Vijaita (12 November 2019). "Maharashtra placed under President's Rule" Archived 25 June 2022 at the Wayback Machine. The Hindu. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Centre takes over Manipur rule" Archived 18 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 26 October 1967. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Yambem, Sanamani (11 June 1977). "Back to President's Rule". Economic and Political Weekly. 12 (24): 945. JSTOR 4365678.
- ↑ Dhavan, Rajeev (October–December 1989). "President's Rule: Recent Trends". Journal of the Indian Law Institute. 31 (4): 521–533. JSTOR 43951266.
- ↑ Laithangbam, Swarnalata (31 March 1981). "President's rule imposed in Manipur, Congress(I) and PDF stake claim to rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Manipur placed under Delhi rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 8 January 1992. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Manipur placed under Central rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 1 January 1994. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Chaudhuri, Kalyan (16 February 2002). "Uncertain in Manipur" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Frontline. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ 76.0 76.1 "President's rule imposed in Manipur". The Hindu. 13 February 2025. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 13 February 2025. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name ":7" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ "Meghalaya clamped under President's Rule". www.merinews.com. Archived from the original on 5 June 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ↑ Majumdar, Sarbari (15 November 1991). "Biased rulings spark trouble in Meghalaya" Archived 25 September 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Karmakar, Rahul; Sharma, Nagendar (19 March 2009). "President's Rule in Meghalaya" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Hindustan Times. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ 80.0 80.1 S. P. Sinha (2007). Lost Opportunities: 50 Years of Insurgency in the North-east and India's. Lancer Publishers. ISBN 9788170621621. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
- ↑ Menon, Ramesh (30 September 1988). "Mizoram comes under President's Rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Menon, Ramesh (31 August 1988). "President's Rule imposed in Nagaland under questionable circumstances" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Menon, R. (30 April 1992). "Nagaland, Manipur turn political hot spots" Archived 3 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's Rule had become necessary in Nagaland: Governor" Archived 3 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. 7 September 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's rule revoked in Nagaland" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. 12 March 2008. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Sethy, Rabindra Kumar (2003). Political Crisis and President's Rule in an Indian State. New Delhi: A. P. H. Publishing Company. pp. 134–135. ISBN 978-81-7648-463-3 Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Orissa Chief Minister Nandini Satpathy resigns" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. 15 January 1977. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's Rule for PEPSU" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 6 March 1953. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's rule for PEPSU?" Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Economic and Political Weekly. 5 (9): 235. 28 February 1953. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President takes over in Pondy" Archived 3 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 19 September 1968. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Forty Years Ago: November 13, 1978" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 13 November 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Chatterjee, Sibranjan (1992). "The Dismissal of the Ministry". Governor's Role in the Indian Constitution. New Delhi: Mittal Publications. p. 136. ISBN 978-81-7099-325-4. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Badhwar, Inderjit; Chawla, Prabhu (15 March 1991). "President R. Venkataraman faces criticism for playing partisan politics" Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Pondy Assembly dissolved; uproarious scenes in LS" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 5 March 1991. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President's Rule imposed in Puducherry" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Scroll.in. 25 February 2021. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Nayar, Baldev Raj (1968). "Punjab". In Weiner, Myron (ed.). State Politics in India. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 463–467. OCLC 501863. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Arora, Subhash Chander (1990). "Governor's Whim Prevails – 1971". President's Rule in Indian States: A Study of Punjab (1st ed.). Delhi: Mittal Publications. pp. 180–200. ISBN 978-81-7099-234-9
- ↑ Gupta, Shekhar; Thukral, Gobind (31 October 1983). "Punjab crisis takes dramatic turn, Darbara Singh govt dismissed, President's Rule imposed" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Chawla, G. S. (12 March 1987). "Punjab comes under President's rule: Assembly in suspended animation" Archived 25 September 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Phadnis, Urmila (December 1980). "Ethnic Dimensions of Sikkimese Politics: The 1979 Elections". Asian Survey. 20 (12): 1236–1252. doi:10.2307/2643629. JSTOR 2643629.
- ↑ Claiborne, William (26 May 1984). "Sikkim Put Under Federal Rule After Mass Party Shift" Archived 25 September 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Washington Post. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Hardgrave, Robert L. (February 1985). "India in 1984: Confrontation, Assassination, and Succession". Asian Survey. 25 (2, A Survey of Asia in 1984: Part II): 131–144. doi:10.2307/2644297. JSTOR 2644297.
- ↑ Marthandam, Nambi (29 February 1976). "President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed dismisses DMK ministry, places Tamil Nadu under President's Rule" Archived 3 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "TN Assembly dissolved: elections soon" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 31 January 1988. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Congress had no role in dismissing DMK govt in 1991". The Hindu. 14 April 2016. Archived from the original on 10 December 2016. Retrieved 25 June 2016.
- ↑ Maheshwari, Shriram (1977). President's rule in India. New Delhi: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-90186-1 OCLC 470784780
- ↑ Banerjee, R; Baweja, H (31 March 1993). "Prime Minister Narasimha Rao sacrifices Tripura Government to curry favour with the Left" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Swami, Venkitesh (1 November 1997). "A crisis defused" Archived 25 September 2024 at the Wayback Machine. The Hindu. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Mishra, Subhash (18 March 2002). "Imposition of President's rule in Uttar Pradesh comes as a boon to political parties" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. India Today. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Uttar Pradesh put under President's rule" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Times of India. 10 March 2002. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "Lessons from Uttarakhand and Arunachal: What court orders on Central rule say". 15 July 2016. Archived from the original on 14 July 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
- ↑ Sinha, Bhadra (23 April 2016). "SC stays Uttarakhand HC order which set aside President's Rule in state" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Hindustan Times. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ Pandey, Sidharth (15 May 2016). Singh, Veer Arjun (ed.). "President's Rule Lifted From Uttarakhand, Congress Back In Power: 10 Points" Archived 13 June 2024 at the Wayback Machine. NDTV. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ↑ "President takes over West Bengal" Archived 2 May 2024 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Express. 21 February 1968. p. 1. Retrieved 2 May 2024.