Created by Ajay Kumar
Last edited March 24, 2026
Created a new article
 
m Enhanced content and organization
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Philosopher, speaker and writer (1895–1986)}}
{{short description|Spiritual speaker and writer (1895–1986)}}
{{Distinguish|U. G. Krishnamurti}}
{{Family name hatnote|Jiddu|lang=Telugu}}
{{Family name hatnote|Jiddu|lang=Telugu}}
{{EngvarB|date=March 2014}}
{{EngvarB|date=March 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2018}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2023}}
{{Infobox philosopher
{{Infobox philosopher
| name              = Jiddu Krishnamurti
| name              = Jiddu Krishnamurti
Line 9: Line 10:
| caption            = Krishnamurti in the 1920s
| caption            = Krishnamurti in the 1920s
| birth_date        = {{birth date|df=yes|1895|5|11}}
| birth_date        = {{birth date|df=yes|1895|5|11}}
| birth_place        = [[Madanapalle]], [[Madras Presidency]], British India
| birth_place        = [[Madanapalle]], [[British Raj|British India]]
| death_date        = {{Death date and age|1986|02|17|1895|05|11|df=yes}}
| death_date        = {{Death date and age|1986|02|17|1895|05|12|df=yes}}
| death_place        = [[Ojai, California]], U.S.
| death_place        = [[Ojai, California]], U.S.
| education          =  
| education          =  
Line 20: Line 21:
**[[Indian philosophy]]}}
**[[Indian philosophy]]}}
|era=[[20th-century philosophy]]
|era=[[20th-century philosophy]]
|influenced={{flatlist|
* [[Bernard Shaw|Shaw]]
* [[Nehru]]
* [[Henry Miller|Miller]]
* [[Aldous Huxley]]
* [[Dada Dharmadhikari|Dharmadhikari]]
* [[Achyut Patwardhan|Patwardhan]]
* [[Jackson Pollock|Pollock]]
* [[Alan Watts|Watts]]
* [[Toni Packer|Packer]]
* [[Bruce Lee|Lee]]
* [[Eckhart Tolle|Tolle]]}}
|influences={{flatlist|
* [[Annie Besant|Besant]]
* [[Charles Webster Leadbeater|Leadbeater]]
* [[Aldous Huxley|Huxley]]}}
|institutions=[[Krishnamurti Foundation]] (founder)
|institutions=[[Krishnamurti Foundation]] (founder)
|notable_works={{plainlist|
|notable_works={{plainlist|
Line 42: Line 27:
* ''[[Freedom from the Known]]'' (1969)
* ''[[Freedom from the Known]]'' (1969)
}}}}
}}}}
'''Jiddu Krishnamurti''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|dʒ|ɪ|d|uː|_|ˌ|k|r|ɪ|ʃ|n|ə|ˈ|m|uːr|t|i}} {{respell|JID|oo|_|KRISH|nə|MOOR|tee}}; 11 May 1895 – 17 February 1986) was an Indian philosopher, speaker and writer. In his early life, he was raised to be the new [[Maitreya (Theosophy)#The World Teacher Project|World Teacher]], an advanced [[Spirituality|spiritual]] position in the [[Theosophy|theosophical]] tradition, but later rejected this mantle and distanced himself from the related movement. He spent the rest of his life travelling the world speaking to large and small groups, as well as individuals. He emphasized topics such as [[choiceless awareness]], psychological inquiry, and freedom from the need for any religious, spiritual or cultural authority.
'''Jiddu Krishnamurti''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|dʒ|ɪ|d|uː|_|ˌ|k|r|ɪ|ʃ|n|ə|ˈ|m|uːr|t|i}} {{respell|JID|oo|_|KRISH|nə|MOOR|tee}}; 11 May 1895 – 17 February 1986) was an Indian [[Spirituality|spiritual]] figure, speaker, and writer. Adopted by members of the [[Theosophical Society]] as a child, Krishnamurti was raised to fill the mantle of the prophesied [[Maitreya (Theosophy)#The World Teacher Project|World Teacher]], a role tasked with aiding humankind's spiritual evolution. In 1922, he began to suffer from painful, [[seizure]]-like [[mystical experiences|mystical episodes]] that would produce a lasting change in his perception of reality.{{efn|name="process"}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=ch.18-21}}{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=124-128}}{{efn-la|name="proces_explanation"}} In 1929, he broke from the [[Theosophy|Theosophy movement]] and disbanded the [[Order of the Star in the East]] which had been formed around him. He spent the rest of his life speaking to groups and individuals around the world, hoping to contribute a radical transformation of mankind.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=268}}{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=68}}{{efn|name="no_ego"}}{{efn-la|name="I_am_free"}}{{efn-la|name="locking_of_horns"}} 


Krishnamurti wrote many books, among them ''[[The First and Last Freedom]]'', ''The Only Revolution'', and ''[[Krishnamurti's Notebook]]''. Many of his talks and discussions have been published. His last public talk was in Madras (now known as Chennai), India, in January 1986, a month before his death at his home in [[Ojai, California]]. His supporters — working through non-profit foundations in India, Britain, and the United States — oversee several independent schools based on his views on education. They continue to transcribe and distribute his thousands of talks, group and individual discussions, and writings by use of a variety of media formats and languages.
Krishnamurti asserted that "truth is a pathless land" and advised against following any [[doctrine]], discipline, teacher, [[guru]], or authority, including himself.<ref>{{cite journal|author-last=Rodrigues|author-first=Hillary|date=January 1996|title=J. Krishnamurti's 'religious mind'|journal=Religious Studies and Theology|volume=15|issue=1|pages=40–55|issn=0829-2922}}</ref> Nonetheless, during his life he tried to share his insights in 'the teachings', urging for a state without conceptual deliberations and thought.{{efn|name="immediatism"}} In Krishnamurti's perception, such a [[righteousness]] was only possible through the practice of passive or [[choiceless awareness]], which he called the essence of "true meditation" in contrast to contrived techniques.{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=26-29}}{{efn|{{harvp|Krishnamurti|1976}}"The foundation for true meditation is that passive awareness which is the total freedom from authority and ambition, envy and fear. Meditation has no meaning, no significance whatsoever without this freedom [...] Thought is of knowledge and knowledge cannot free the mind of the fact. Meditation is the choiceless awareness of this complex, which empties the mind of the known."}} He gained a wider recognition in the 1950s, after [[Aldous Huxley]] had introduced him to his mainstream publisher and the publication of ''[[The First and Last Freedom]]'' (1954). Many of his talks have been published since, among them ''[[Commentaries on Living]]'' (1956–60) and ''[[Krishnamurti's Notebook]]'' (written 1961-62).
 
A few days before his death he stated that nobody had understood what his body went through, and after his death, this consciousness would be gone, and no other body would support it "for many hundred years."{{efn|name="nobody"}} His supporters—working through [[Krishnamurti foundations|non-profit foundations]] in India, Britain, and the United States—oversee several independent schools based on his educational philosophy and continue to distribute his extensive body of talks, dialogues, and writings in various media formats and languages.


==Biography==
==Biography==
===Family background and childhood===
===Family background and childhood===
[[File:Jiddu Krishnamurti house.jpg|thumb|alt=House in which Krishnamurti was born |House in [[Madanapalle]], in which Krishnamurti was born]]
[[File:Jiddu Krishnamurti house.jpg|thumb|alt=House in which Krishnamurti was born |House in [[Madanapalle]], in which Krishnamurti was born]]
[[File:At the feet of the master pg 2.jpg|thumb|Krishnamurti in 1910]]
[[File:At the feet of the master pg 2.jpg|thumb|Krishnamurti in 1910]]
The date of birth of Krishnamurti is a matter of dispute. [[Mary Lutyens]] determines it to be 11 May 1895,<ref>Lutyens (1995), footnotes 1, 2.</ref> but Christine Williams notes the unreliability of birth registrations in that period and that statements claiming dates ranging from 4 May 1895 to 25 May 1896 exist. She used calculations based on a published horoscope to derive a date of 11 May 1895 but "retains a measure of scepticism" about it.<ref>Williams (2004), p. 465.</ref> His birthplace was the small town of [[Madanapalle]] in [[Madras Presidency]] ({{As of|2011|alt=modern-day}} [[Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh|Chittoor District]] in [[Andhra Pradesh]]). He was born in a [[Telugu language|Telugu]]-speaking [[Brahmin]] family.<ref>Lutyens (1975). p. 7.</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Lutyens|first=Mary|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iG2hHtxiXyoC&q=brahmin|title=Open Door|date=2003|publisher=Krishnamurti Foundation Trust Ltd.|isbn=978-0-900506-21-5|language=en}}</ref> His father, Jiddu Narayanaiah, was employed as an official of the British colonial administration. Krishnamurti was fond of his mother Sanjeevamma, who died when he was ten.<ref>Lutyens (1975). p. 5.</ref> His parents had a total of eleven children, of whom six survived childhood.<ref>Williams (2004), pp. 471–472.</ref>
Born during the late [[British Raj]], the date of birth of Krishnamurti is a matter of dispute. [[Mary Lutyens]] determines it to be 11 May 1895,{{sfnp|Lutyens|1995|p=footnotes 1, 2}} but Christine Williams notes the unreliability of birth registrations in that period and points to various claims placing his birth between 4 May 1895 and 25 May 1896. She used calculations based on a published horoscope to derive a date of 11 May 1895 but "retains a measure of scepticism" about it.{{sfnp|Williams|2004|p=465}}


In 1903 the family settled in [[Kadapa|Cudappah]], where Krishnamurti had contracted [[malaria]] during a previous stay. He suffered recurrent bouts of the disease over many years.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp.2–4.</ref> A sensitive and sickly child, "vague and dreamy", he was often taken to be intellectually disabled, and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 3–4, 22, 25.</ref> In memoirs written when he was eighteen years old Krishnamurti described [[psychic]] experiences, such as seeing his sister, who had died in 1904, and his late mother.<ref>Lutyens (1983a), pp. 5, 309</ref> Even from his childhood he felt a bond with nature that was to stay with him for the rest of his life.<ref>J. Krishnamurti (2004), p. 16.</ref> Writing in  his journal Krishnamurti states "He always had this strange lack of distance between himself and the trees, rivers, mountains. It wasn't cultivated."<ref>Krishnamurti’s Journal, 17 September 1973.</ref>
His birthplace was the small town of [[Madanapalle]] in [[Madras Presidency]] ({{As of|2025|alt=modern-day}} [[Annamayya district|Annamayya District]] in [[Andhra Pradesh]]). He was born in a [[Telugu language|Telugu]]-speaking [[Brahmin]] family.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=7}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003a}} His father, Jiddu Narayanaiah, was employed as an official of the British colonial administration. Krishnamurti was fond of his mother Sanjeevamma, who died when he was ten.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=5}} His parents had a total of eleven children, of whom six survived childhood.{{sfnp|Williams|2004|p=471–472}}


Krishnamurti's father retired at the end of 1907. He sought employment at the headquarters of the [[Theosophical Society Adyar|Theosophical Society]] at Adyar. Narayanaiah had been a [[Theosophist]] since 1882. He was eventually hired by the Society as a clerk, moving there with his family in January 1909.<ref>Lutyens (1983a), pp. 7–8.</ref> Narayanaiah and his sons were at first assigned to live in a small cottage that was located just outside the society's compound.<ref>''Star In The East: The Invention of A Messiah'', by [[Roland Vernon]], Palgrave 2001, p 41.</ref>
In 1903 the family settled in [[Kadapa]], where Krishnamurti had contracted [[malaria]] during a previous stay. He suffered recurrent bouts of the disease over many years.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=2–4}} A sensitive and sickly child, described as "vague and dreamy", he was often considered intellectually disabled and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=3–4, 22, 25}} In memoirs written when he was eighteen years old Krishnamurti described [[psychic]] experiences, such as seeing his sister, who had died in 1904, and his late mother.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=5, 309}} Even from his childhood he felt a bond with nature which was to stay with him for the rest of his life.{{sfnp|Krishnamurti|2004|p=16}} Writing in his journal Krishnamurti states "He always had this strange lack of distance between himself and the trees, rivers, mountains. It wasn't cultivated."<ref>Krishnamurti's Journal, 17 September 1973.</ref>


Krishnamurti was a [[Vegetarianism|vegetarian]] from birth and his family were strict vegetarians. He was an opponent of [[meat eating]], based on ethical and spiritual reasons.<ref>Williams, C. V. (2004). ''Jiddu Krishnamurti World Philosopher (1895–1986) : His Life and Thoughts''. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 104. {{ISBN|978-8120820326}}</ref><ref>[http://www.krishnamurtiaustralia.org/articles/vegetarian.htm "Krishnamurti on Eating Meat & Vegetarianism"]. krishnamurtiaustralia.org. Retrieved 10 May 2023.</ref>
Krishnamurti's father retired at the end of 1907 and then sought employment at the headquarters of the [[Theosophical Society Adyar|Theosophical Society]] at Adyar. Narayanaiah had been a [[Theosophist]] since 1882. He was eventually hired by the Society as a clerk, moving there with his family in January 1909.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=7–8}} Narayanaiah and his sons were at first assigned to live in a small cottage that was located just outside the society's compound.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=41}}


===Discovered===
Krishnamurti was a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]] from birth, and his family were strict vegetarians. He was an opponent of [[meat eating]], based on ethical and spiritual reasons.{{sfnp|Williams|2004|p=104}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.krishnamurtiaustralia.org/articles/vegetarian.htm |title=Krishnamurti on eating meat & vegetarianism |website=Krishnamurti Australia |access-date=10 May 2023 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230511020937/http://www.krishnamurtiaustralia.org/articles/vegetarian.htm |archive-date=11 May 2023 }}</ref> Krishnamurti was also a "[[teetotalism|teetotaler]], nonsmoker, and practitioner of [[yoga]]."<ref name=Saxon/>
In April 1909, Krishnamurti first met [[Charles Webster Leadbeater]], who claimed [[clairvoyance]]. Leadbeater had noticed Krishnamurti on the Society's beach on the Adyar river, and was amazed by the "most wonderful [[Aura (paranormal)|aura]] he had ever seen, without a particle of selfishness in it."{{efn|According to [[occult]] and Theosophical lore, auras are invisible emanations related to each individual's so-called [[Subtle body|subtler planes of existence]], as well as her or his normal plane. The ability to discern a person's aura is considered one of the possible effects of clairvoyance. Leadbeater's occult knowledge and abilities were highly respected within the Society.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 15, 20–21</ref>}} [[Ernest Wood]], an adjutant of Leadbeater's at the time, who helped Krishnamurti with his homework, considered him to be "particularly dim-witted."<ref name="Lutyens1975p21">Lutyens (1975), p. 21.</ref> Leadbeater was convinced that the boy would become a spiritual teacher and a great [[orator]]; the likely "vehicle for the [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|Lord Maitreya]]" in Theosophical [[doctrine]], an advanced spiritual entity periodically appearing on Earth as a World Teacher to guide the evolution of humankind.<ref name="Lutyens1975p21" />


In her biography of Krishnamurti, [[Pupul Jayakar]] quotes him speaking of that period in his life some 75 years later: "The boy had always said 'I will do whatever you want.' There was an element of subservience, obedience. The boy was vague, uncertain, [[wikt:woolly-minded#Adjective|woolly]]; he didn't seem to care what was happening. He was like a vessel with a large hole in it, whatever was put in, went through, nothing remained."<ref>Pupul (1986), p. 28.</ref> Krishnamurti himself described his state of mind as a young boy: "No thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was no image-making. He often attempted to think but no thought would come."<ref>Krishnamurti’s Journal, 15 September 1973.</ref>
===Appropriation by the Theosophical Society===
In April 1909, Krishnamurti first met [[Charles Webster Leadbeater]], who claimed [[clairvoyance]]. Leadbeater had noticed Krishnamurti on the Society's beach on the Adyar river, and was amazed by the "most wonderful [[Aura (paranormal)|aura]] he had ever seen, without a particle of selfishness in it."{{efn|
According to [[occult]] and Theosophical lore, auras are invisible emanations related to each individual's so-called [[subtle body|subtler planes of existence]], as well as her or his normal plane. The ability to discern a person's aura is considered one of the possible effects of clairvoyance. Leadbeater's occult knowledge and abilities were highly respected within the Society.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=15, 20–21}}
}}
[[Ernest Wood]], an adjutant of Leadbeater's at the time, who helped Krishnamurti with his homework, considered him to be "particularly dim-witted."{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=21}} Leadbeater was convinced that the boy would become a spiritual teacher and a great [[orator]]; the likely "vehicle for the [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|Lord Maitreya]]" in Theosophical [[doctrine]], an advanced spiritual entity periodically appearing on Earth as a World Teacher to guide the evolution of humankind.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=21}}<ref name ="Algeo" /> This World teacher "was supposed to "overshadow" Krishnamurti by using his body to communicate with humanity. There was no thought among Theosophists of Krishnamurti himself being the World Teacher; he was merely to be the channel through which the World Teacher would speak."<ref name ="Algeo" />
 
In her biography of Krishnamurti, [[Pupul Jayakar]] quotes his reflection on that period in his life some 75&nbsp;years later: "The boy had always said 'I will do whatever you want.' There was an element of subservience, obedience. The boy was vague, uncertain, [[wikt:woolly-minded#Adjective|woolly]]; he didn't seem to care what was happening. He was like a vessel with a large hole in it, whatever was put in, went through, nothing remained."{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=28}} Krishnamurti himself described his state of mind as a young boy: "No thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was no image-making. He often attempted to think but no thought would come."<ref>Krishnamurti's Journal, 15 September 1973.</ref>
[[File:Povedano - Jiddu Krishnamurti.png|thumb|Krishnamurti by [[Tomás Povedano]]]]
[[File:Povedano - Jiddu Krishnamurti.png|thumb|Krishnamurti by [[Tomás Povedano]]]]
Following his discovery by Leadbeater, Krishnamurti was nurtured by the Theosophical Society in Adyar. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and generally preparing Krishnamurti as the "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (often later called ''Krishnaji'')<ref>Jayakar (1986), p. xi. The suffix&nbsp;–ji in Hindu names is a sign of affection or respect.</ref> and his younger brother Nityananda (''Nitya'') were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and later exposed to an opulent life among a segment of European [[High society (social class)|high society]] as they continued their education abroad. Despite his history of problems with schoolwork and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the 14-year-old Krishnamurti was able to speak and write competently in English within six months.<ref>Vernon (2001), pp. 51–72.</ref> Lutyens says that later in life Krishnamurti came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event. When he was asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater he unhesitatingly replied "I would have died".<ref>Lutyens (1995)</ref>
Following his discovery by Leadbeater, Krishnamurti was nurtured by the Theosophical Society in Adyar. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and generally preparing Krishnamurti as the "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (often later called ''Krishnaji''){{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=xi}}{{efn|The suffix&nbsp;–ji in Hindu names is a sign of affection or respect.}} and his younger brother Nityananda (''Nitya'') were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and later exposed to an opulent life among a segment of European [[High society (social class)|high society]] as they continued their education abroad. Despite his history of problems with schoolwork and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the 14&nbsp;year-old Krishnamurti was able to speak and write competently in English within six months.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=51–72}} Lutyens says that later in life Krishnamurti came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event. When he was asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater he unhesitatingly replied "I would have died".{{sfnp|Lutyens|1995}}


During this time Krishnamurti had developed a strong bond with [[Annie Besant]] and came to view her as a surrogate mother. His father, who had initially assented to Besant's [[legal guardian]]ship of Krishnamurti,<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 40.</ref> was pushed into the background by the swirl of attention around his son. In 1912 he sued Besant to annul the guardianship agreement. After a protracted legal battle, Besant took custody of Krishnamurti and Nitya.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 54–63, 64–71, 82, 84.</ref> As a result of this separation from family and home Krishnamurti and his brother (whose relationship had always been very close) became more dependent on each other, and in the following years often travelled together.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 3, 32.</ref>
During this time Krishnamurti had developed a strong bond with [[Annie Besant]] and came to view her as a surrogate mother. His father, who had initially assented to Besant's [[legal guardian]]ship of Krishnamurti,{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=40}} was pushed into the background by the swirl of attention around his son. In 1912 he sued Besant to annul the guardianship agreement. After a protracted legal battle, Besant took custody of Krishnamurti and Nitya.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=54–63, 64–71, 82, 84}} As a result of this separation from family and home Krishnamurti and his brother (whose relationship had always been very close) became more dependent on each other, and in the following years often travelled together.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=3, 32}}


In 1911 the Theosophical Society established the Order of the Star in the East (OSE) to prepare the world for the expected appearance of the World Teacher. Krishnamurti was named as its head, with senior Theosophists assigned various other positions. Membership was open to anybody who accepted the doctrine of the ''Coming of the World Teacher''. Controversy soon erupted, both within the Theosophical Society and outside it, in [[Hinduism|Hindu]] circles and the Indian press.{{efn|Lutyens (1975), pp. 40–63 [cumulative]. The news regarding Krishnamurti and the World Teacher was not universally welcomed by Theosophists and led to upheavals in the Society; Lutyens (1983a), pp. 15–19, 40, 56. Part of the controversy was Leadbeater's role. He had a history of being in the company of young boys–pupils under his spiritual and Theosophical instruction, and there was gossip about child abuse&nbsp;— although no accusations were ever proven.}}
In 1911 the [[Theosophical Society]] established the [[Order of the Star in the East]] (OSE) to prepare the world for the expected appearance of the World Teacher. Krishnamurti was named as its head, with senior Theosophists assigned various other positions. Membership was open to anybody who accepted the doctrine of the ''Coming of the World Teacher''. Controversy soon erupted, both within the Theosophical Society and outside it, in [[Hinduism|Hindu]] circles and the Indian press.{{efn|{{harvp|Lutyens|1975|p=40–63}} (cumulative):
:
The news regarding Krishnamurti and the World Teacher was not universally welcomed by Theosophists and led to upheavals in the Society; {{harvp|Lutyens|1983|p=15–19, 40, 56}}. Part of the controversy was [[Charles Webster Leadbeater|Leadbeater's]] role: He had a history of being frequently in the company of young boys—pupils under his spiritual and Theosophical instruction—and there was gossip of [[child sexual abuse|child abuse]], although no accusations were ever proven.
}}


===Growing up===
===Preparation as the World Teacher===
[[Mary Lutyens]], a biographer, says that there was a time when Krishnamurti believed that he was to become the World Teacher after correct spiritual and secular guidance and education.<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 10-11, 93.</ref> Another biographer describes the daily program imposed on him by Leadbeater and his associates, which included rigorous exercise and sports, tutoring in a variety of school subjects, Theosophical and religious lessons, [[yoga]] and meditation, as well as instruction in proper hygiene and in the ways of British society and culture.<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 57.</ref> At the same time Leadbeater assumed the role of guide in a parallel [[Mysticism|mystical]] instruction of Krishnamurti; the existence and progress of this instruction was at the time known only to a select few.<ref>Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 4: First Initiation" and "Chapter 5: First Teaching" pp. 29–46 [cumulative].</ref>
[[Mary Lutyens]], a biographer, says that there was a time when Krishnamurti believed that he was to become the World Teacher after correct spiritual and secular guidance and education.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=10-11, 93}} Another biographer describes the daily program imposed on him by Leadbeater and his associates, which included rigorous exercise and sports, tutoring in a variety of school subjects, Theosophical and religious lessons, [[yoga]] and meditation, as well as instruction in proper hygiene and in the ways of British society and culture.<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 57.</ref> At the same time Leadbeater assumed the role of guide in a parallel [[Mysticism|mystical]] instruction of Krishnamurti; the existence and progress of this instruction was at the time known only to a select few.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p="Chapter 4: First Initiation" and "Chapter 5: First Teaching" pp. 29–46 (cumulative)}}


While he showed a natural aptitude in sports, Krishnamurti always had problems with formal schooling and was not academically inclined. He eventually gave up university education after several attempts at admission. He did take to foreign languages, in time speaking several with some fluency.<ref>Lutyens (1997), pp. 83, 120, 149.</ref>
While he showed a natural aptitude in sports, Krishnamurti always had problems with formal schooling and was not academically inclined. He eventually gave up university education after several attempts at admission. He did take to foreign languages, in time speaking several with some fluency.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1997|p=83, 120, 149}}


His public image, cultivated by the Theosophists, "was to be characterized by a well-polished exterior, a sobriety of purpose, a cosmopolitan outlook and an otherworldly, almost [[wikt:beatific|beatific]] detachment in his demeanor."<ref name=Vernon2001p53>Vernon (2001), p. 53.</ref> Demonstrably, "all of these can be said to have characterized Krishnamurti's public image to the end of his life."<ref name=Vernon2001p53 /> It was apparently clear early on that he "possessed an innate personal magnetism, not of a warm physical variety, but nonetheless emotive in its austerity, and inclined to inspire veneration."<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 52.</ref> However, as he was growing up, Krishnamurti showed signs of adolescent rebellion and emotional instability, chafing at the regimen imposed on him, visibly uncomfortable with the publicity surrounding him, and occasionally expressing doubts about the future prescribed for him.{{efn|Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 10: Doubts and Difficulties" through "Chapter 15: In Love" pp. 80–132 [cumulative].}}
His public image, cultivated by the Theosophists, "was to be characterized by a well-polished exterior, a sobriety of purpose, a cosmopolitan outlook and an otherworldly, almost [[wikt:beatific|beatific]] detachment in his demeanor."<ref name=Vernon2001p53>Vernon (2001), p. 53.</ref> Demonstrably, "all of these can be said to have characterized Krishnamurti's public image to the end of his life."<ref name=Vernon2001p53 /> It was apparently clear early on that he "possessed an innate personal magnetism, not of a warm physical variety, but nonetheless emotive in its austerity, and inclined to inspire veneration."{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=52}} However, as he was growing up, Krishnamurti showed signs of adolescent rebellion and emotional instability, chafing at the regimen imposed on him, visibly uncomfortable with the publicity surrounding him, and occasionally expressing doubts about the future prescribed for him.{{efn|Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 10: Doubts and Difficulties" through "Chapter 15: In Love" pp. 80–132 [cumulative].}}


[[File:Annie-Besant-J-Krishnamurti-Ernest-Wood.jpg|thumb|alt=Photograph of Krishnamurti with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and others in London 1911|Krishnamurti in England in 1911 with his brother Nitya and the Theosophists [[Annie Besant]] and [[George Arundale]]]]
[[File:Annie-Besant-J-Krishnamurti-Ernest-Wood.jpg|thumb|alt=Photograph of Krishnamurti with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and others in London 1911|Krishnamurti in England in 1911 with his brother Nitya, [[Annie Besant]], and [[George Arundale]]]]
Krishnamurti and Nitya were taken to England in April 1911.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 50–51.</ref> During this trip Krishnamurti gave his first public speech to members of the OSE in London.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 51–52.</ref> His first writings had also started to appear, published in booklets by the Theosophical Society and in Theosophical and OSE-affiliated magazines.<ref>Lutyens (1997), pp. 46, 74–75, 126. Krishnamurti was named Editor of the ''Herald of the Star'', the official bulletin of the OSE. His position was mainly as a figurehead, yet he often wrote editorial notes, which along with his other contributions helped the magazine's circulation.</ref> Between 1911 and the start of [[World War I]] in 1914, the brothers visited several other European countries, always accompanied by Theosophist [[Chaperone (social)|chaperones]].<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 65.</ref> Meanwhile, Krishnamurti had for the first time acquired a measure of personal financial independence, thanks to a wealthy benefactress, American [[Mary Melissa Hoadley Dodge]], who was domiciled in England.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 4, 75, 77.</ref>
Krishnamurti and Nitya were taken to England in April 1911.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=50–51}} During this trip Krishnamurti gave his first public speech to members of the OSE in London.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=51–52}} His first writings had also started to appear, published in booklets by the Theosophical Society and in Theosophical and OSE-affiliated magazines.{{efn|
{{harvp|Lutyens|1997|p=46, 74–75, 126}}. Krishnamurti was named editor of [[Order of the Star in the East|''The Herald of the Star'']], the official bulletin of the [[Order of the Star in the East|OSE]]. His position was mainly as a figurehead, yet he often wrote "editorial notes", which along with his other contributions helped the magazine's circulation; see, for example, {{harvp|Krishnamurti|1926}}.
}}
Between 1911 and the start of [[World War I]] in 1914, the brothers visited several other European countries, always accompanied by Theosophist [[chaperone (social)|chaperones]].{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=65}} Meanwhile, Krishnamurti had for the first time acquired a measure of personal financial independence, thanks to [[Mary Melissa Hoadley Dodge]] – a wealthy American benefactress then resident in England.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=4, 75, 77}}


After the war, Krishnamurti embarked on a series of lectures, meetings and discussions around the world, related to his duties as the Head of the OSE, accompanied by Nitya, by then the Organizing Secretary of the [[#Order|Order]].<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 125.</ref> Krishnamurti also continued writing.<ref>See [[Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography]].</ref> The content of his talks and writings revolved around the work of the Order and of its members in preparation for the ''Coming''. He was initially described as a halting, hesitant, and repetitive speaker, but his delivery and confidence improved, and he gradually took command of the meetings.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 134–35, 171–17.</ref>
After the war, Krishnamurti embarked on a series of lectures, meetings and discussions around the world, related to his duties as the Head of the [[Order of the Star in the East|OSE]], accompanied by Nitya, by then the Organizing Secretary of the Order.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=125}} Krishnamurti also continued writing.{{efn|See [[Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography]].}} The content of his talks and writings revolved around the work of [[Order of the Star in the East|the Order]] and of its members in preparation for the ''coming''. He was initially described as a halting, hesitant, and repetitive speaker, but his delivery and confidence improved, and he gradually took command of the organization's meetings.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=134–35, 171–17}}


In 1921 Krishnamurti fell in love with [[Helen Nearing|Helen Knothe]], a 17-year-old American whose family associated with the Theosophists. The experience was tempered by the realisation that his work and expected life-mission precluded what would otherwise be considered normal relationships and by the mid-1920s the two of them had drifted apart.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 114, 118, 131–132, 258.</ref>
In 1921 Krishnamurti fell in love with [[Helen Nearing|Helen Knothe]], a 17-year-old American, whose family associated with the Theosophists. The experience was tempered by the realisation that his work and expected life-mission precluded what would otherwise be considered normal relationships and by the mid-1920s the two of them had drifted apart.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=114, 118, 131–132, 258}} She later said that Krishnamurti's attitudes were conditioned by privilege, because he had been supported, even pampered, by devoted followers from the time of his "discovery" by the theosophists. She also said that he was at such an "elevated" level that he was incapable of forming "normal personal relationships".<ref>{{cite book |last=Nearing |first=H. |author-link=Helen Nearing |year=1992 |title=Loving and Leaving the Good Life |place=White River Junction, VT |publisher=Chelsea Green |isbn=978-0-9300-3154-1 }}</ref>


===Life-altering experiences===
===<span class="anchor" id="Ojai"></span> Taking residence at Ojai, 'the process', and growing expectations===
In 1922 Krishnamurti and Nitya travelled from [[Sydney]] to [[California]]. In California, they stayed at a cottage in the [[Ojai, California|Ojai Valley]]. It was thought that the area's climate would be beneficial to Nitya, who had been diagnosed with [[tuberculosis]]. Nitya's failing health became a concern for Krishnamurti.<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 97.</ref><ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 149, 199, 209, 216–217.</ref> At Ojai they met [[Rosalind Rajagopal|Rosalind Williams]], a young American who became close to them both, and who was later to play a significant role in Krishnamurti's life.<ref>Lutyens (1991), p. 35.</ref> For the first time the brothers were without immediate supervision by their Theosophical Society minders.<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 113.</ref> They found the Valley to be very agreeable. Eventually, a [[Trust law|trust]], formed by supporters, bought a cottage and surrounding property there for them. This became Krishnamurti's official residence.<ref>Lutyens (1983b), p. 6.</ref>
<!-- The anchor above serves as a target for incoming section links: do not remove it or modify it. If you rename the section, please add another anchor to the previous title using {{subst:anchor|OLDNAME}} so that existing links to it won't break. See [[Template:Anchor]] for details. ({{subst:Anchor comment}}) --><!--Linked from [[Order of the Star in the East]] ([[MOS:HEAD]]).-->
In 1922 Krishnamurti and Nitya travelled from [[Sydney]] to [[California]]. In California, they stayed at a cottage in the [[Ojai, California|Ojai Valley]]. It was thought that the area's climate would be beneficial to Nitya, who had been diagnosed with [[tuberculosis]]. Nitya's failing health became a concern for Krishnamurti.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=97}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=149, 199, 209, 216–217}} At Ojai they met [[Rosalind Rajagopal|Rosalind Williams]], a young American who became close to them both, and who was later to play a significant role in Krishnamurti's life.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1990|p=35}} For the first time the brothers were without immediate supervision by their Theosophical Society minders.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=113}} They found the Valley to be very agreeable. Eventually, a [[Trust law|trust]], formed by supporters, bought a cottage and surrounding property there for them. This became Krishnamurti's official residence.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983b|p=6}}


At Ojai in August and September 1922, Krishnamurti went through an intense 'life-changing' experience.<ref>Jayakar (1986), pp. 46–57.</ref> This has been variously characterised as a spiritual awakening, a psychological transformation, and a physical reconditioning. The initial events happened in two distinct phases: first a three-day [[Religious experience|spiritual experience]], and two weeks later, a longer-lasting condition that Krishnamurti and those around him referred to as ''the process''. This condition recurred, at frequent intervals and with varying intensity, until his death.<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 282.</ref>
===='The process'====
At Ojai in August and September 1922, Krishnamurti went through a series of "disturbing physical symptoms that progressed from discomfort to pain,"{{sfnp|Sloss|1993|p=58}} during which he mistook Rosalind for his mother,{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=179-180}} interpreted by some of his followers as intense 'life-changing' experiences'and signs of his advancement along 'the path'.{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=46–57}}{{sfnp|Sloss|1993|p=62}} The initial events happened in two distinct phases: First a three-day acute pain in the neck accompanied by a mystical experience,{{sfnp|Sloss|1993|p=58, 61-62}}{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=282}} and two weeks later, a longer-lasting condition that Krishnamurti and those around him referred to as ''the process''. This condition recurred, at frequent intervals and with varying intensity, until his death.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=282}}


According to witnesses, it started on 17 August 1922 when Krishnamurti complained of a sharp pain at the nape of his neck. Over the next two days the symptoms worsened, with increasing pain and sensitivity, loss of appetite, and occasional delirious ramblings. He seemed to lapse into unconsciousness but later recounted that he was very much aware of his surroundings, and that while in that state he had an experience of [[Mysticism#Types of experience|"mystical union"]]. The following day the symptoms and the experience intensified, climaxing with a sense of "immense peace".<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 158–160.</ref> Following&nbsp;— and apparently related to&nbsp;— these events<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 165.</ref> the condition that came to be known as ''the process'' started to affect him, in September and October that year, as a regular, almost nightly occurrence. Later the ''process'' resumed intermittently, with varying degrees of pain, physical discomfort, and sensitivity, occasionally a lapse into a childlike state, and sometimes an apparent fading out of consciousness, explained as either his body giving in to pain or his mind "going off".{{efn|Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 18: The Turning Point" through "Chapter 21: Climax of the Process" pp. 152–188 [cumulative]. The use of the term "going off" in the accounts of the early occurrences of the process apparently signified so-called [[out-of-body experience]]s.<ref>Lutyens (1990), pp. 134–135.</ref> In later usage the meaning of "going off" was more nuanced.}}
According to Krishnamurti, Nitya, Rosalind, and Mr.&nbsp;Warrington, it started on 17&nbsp;August 1922 when Krishnamurti complained of a sharp pain at the nape of his neck. Over the next two days the symptoms worsened, with increasing pain and sensitivity, loss of appetite, and occasional delirious ramblings. He seemed to lapse into unconsciousness but later recounted that he was very much aware of his surroundings, and that while in that state at 19&nbsp;August 1922 he had "the first most extraordinary experience", in which he felt "at one with his surroundings".{{sfnp|Sloss|1993|p=622}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=170}}{{efn|
{{harvp|Lutyens|1983|p=170}}: "There was a man mending the road; the man was myself; the picaxe he held was myself; the very stone he was breaking up was a part of me."
}}
The following day the symptoms and the experience intensified, and he had an out-of-body experience, feeling "the vibrations of Lord Buddha,"{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=171}} experiencing peace and a "profound calmness".{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=158–160}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=171}} Krishnamurti also wrote that he had "touched compassion which heals all sorrow and suffering; it is not for myself, but for the world".{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=171}}{{efn|name="Sloss_1991_union_comment"}}


These experiences were accompanied or followed by what was interchangeably described as, "the benediction", "the immensity", "the sacredness", "the vastness" and, most often, "the otherness" or "the other".<ref name = Lutyens1988>Lutyens, M. (1988). [https://www.scribd.com/doc/12794647/Mary-Lutyens-3-Krishnamurti-The-Open-Door J. Krishnamurti: The Open Door.] Volume 3 of Biography, p. 12. {{ISBN|0-900506-21-0}}. Retrieved on: 19 November 2011.</ref> It was a state distinct from the process.<ref name="jkrishnamurti">{{cite web|url=http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=27&chid=319&w=|website=jkrishnamurti.org|title=J. Krishnamurti, Krishnamurti's Notebook, Foreword by Mary Lutyens |access-date=28 November 2017}}</ref> According to Lutyens it is evident from his notebook that this experience of ''otherness'' was "with him almost continuously" during his life, and gave him "a sense of being protected".<ref name = Lutyens1988 /> Krishnamurti describes it in his notebook as typically following an acute experience of the ''process'', for example, on awakening the next day:
Following – and apparently related to – these events{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=165}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=178}} the condition that came to be known as ''the process'' started to affect him, in September and October that year, as a regular, almost nightly occurrence. Later ''the process'' resumed intermittently, with varying degrees of pain, physical discomfort, and sensitivity, occasionally a lapse into a childlike state, and sometimes an apparent fading out of consciousness, explained as either his body giving in to pain or his mind "going off".{{efn|{{harvp|Lutyens|1975|p=152–188}}, Chapter&nbsp;18: The Turning Point through Chapter&nbsp;21: Climax of the Process [cumulative]:
{{blockquote|... woke up early with that strong feeling of otherness, of another world that is beyond all thought&nbsp;... there is a heightening of sensitivity. Sensitivity, not only to beauty but also to all other things. The blade of grass was astonishingly green; that one blade of grass contained the whole spectrum of colour; it was intense, dazzling and such a small thing, so easy to destroy&nbsp;...<ref name = Notebook>Krishnamurti, J. (1976). [http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=27&chid=68289&w= Krishnamurti's Notebook], Part 3 Gstaad, Switzerland 13th July to 3rd September 1961. J. Krishnamurti online. {{ISBN|1-888004-63-0}}, {{ISBN|978-1-888004-63-2}}.</ref>}}
:
The use of the term "going off" in the accounts of the early occurrences of 'the process' apparently signified so-called [[out-of-body experience]]s {{harv|Lutyens|1990|p=134–135}}. In later use the meaning of "going off" was more nuanced.
}}
 
===='The Otherness'====
These experiences were accompanied or followed by what was interchangeably described as, "the benediction", "the immensity", "the sacredness", "the vastness" and, most often, "the otherness" or "the other".{{sfnp|Lutyens|1988|p=12}} It was a state related to, but distinct from the process.<ref name=jkrishnamurti>{{cite web |title=J. Krishnamurti, ''Krishnamurti's Notebook'', foreword by Mary Lutyens |url=http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=27&chid=319&w= |via=jkrishnamurti.org |url-status=dead |access-date=28 November 2017 |archive-date=27 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160927062200/http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=27&chid=319&w= }}</ref> According to Lutyens it is evident from his notebook that this experience of ''otherness'' was "with him almost continuously" during his life, and gave him "a sense of being protected".{{sfnp|Lutyens|1988|p=12}} Krishnamurti describes it in his notebook as typically following an acute experience of the ''process'', for example, on awakening the next day:
{{blockquote|... woke up early with that strong feeling of otherness, of another world that is beyond all thought ... there is a heightening of sensitivity. Sensitivity, not only to beauty but also to all other things. The blade of grass was astonishingly green; that one blade of grass contained the whole spectrum of colour; it was intense, dazzling and such a small thing, so easy to destroy&nbsp;...<ref name = Notebook>{{cite book |last=Krishnamurti |first=J. |year=1976b |section=Part&nbsp;3 Gstaad, Switzerland 13th&nbsp;July to 3rd&nbsp;September 1961 |title=Krishnamurti's Notebook |isbn=978-1-888004-63-2 |url=http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=27&chid=68289&w= |via=J. Krishnamurti online (jkrishnamurti.org) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160927062100/http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=27&chid=68289&w= |archive-date=27 September 2016 }} Alt {{ISBN|1-888004-63-0}}.</ref>
}}


This experience of the ''otherness'' was present with him in daily events:
This experience of the ''otherness'' was present with him in daily events:
{{blockquote|It is strange how during one or two interviews that strength, that power filled the room. It seemed to be in one's eyes and breath. It comes into being, suddenly and most unexpectedly, with a force and intensity that is quite overpowering and at other times it's there, quietly and serenely. But it's there, whether one wants it or not. There is no possibility of getting used to it for it has never been nor will it ever be&nbsp;..."<ref name = Notebook />}}
{{blockquote|It is strange how during one or two interviews that strength, that power filled the room. It seemed to be in one's eyes and breath. It comes into being, suddenly and most unexpectedly, with a force and intensity that is quite overpowering and at other times it's there, quietly and serenely. But it's there, whether one wants it or not. There is no possibility of getting used to it for it has never been nor will it ever be&nbsp;..."<ref name = Notebook/>}}
 
====Secretiveness and explanations====
{{harvp|Lutyens|1975}} revealed the existence of ''the process'' in ''The Years of Awakening'', the first volume of her biography of Krishnamurti.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=ch.18-21}} The existence and history of these experiences had remained unknown outside of the Theosophical Society leadership and Krishnamurti's circle of close associates and friends.{{sfnp|''The Times''|1986}}{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=228}}{{efn-la|name="process"}}


Since the initial occurrences of 1922, several explanations have been proposed for this experience of Krishnamurti's.{{efn|Jayakar (1986), p. 46n. and Lutyens (1975), p. 166 provide a frequently given explanation, that it represented the so-called ''awakening of [[kundalini]]'', a process that according to Hindu mysticism culminates in [[Transcendence (religion)|transcendent consciousness]]. Others view it in [[Sigmund Freud|Freudian]] terms. Aberbach (1993) contends that the experiences were a projection of Krishnamurti's accumulated grief over the death of his mother. Sloss (1993), p. 61 considers the ''process'' to be a purely physical event centred on sickness or trauma, and suggests the possibility of [[Temporal lobe epilepsy#Effects on society|epilepsy]], a possibility that Lutyens (1990) rejects. According to Lutyens (1990), pp. 45–46., Krishnamurti believed the ''process'' was necessary for his spiritual development and not a medical matter or condition. As far as he was concerned, he had encountered Truth; he thought the ''process'' was in some way related to this encounter, and to later experiences.}} Leadbeater and other Theosophists expected the "vehicle" to have certain [[paranormal]] experiences but were nevertheless mystified by these developments.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 163–4, 188–9.</ref> During Krishnamurti's later years, the nature and provenance of the continuing ''process'' often came up as a subject in private discussions between himself and associates; these discussions shed some light on the subject but were ultimately inconclusive.<ref>Jayakar (1986), p. 133.</ref> Whatever the case, the ''process'', and the inability of Leadbeater to explain it satisfactorily, if at all, had other consequences according to biographer Roland Vernon:
[[Roland Vernon]], another of his biographers, states that previous attempts (by others) at revealing details from his past, including these reputed experiences, were suppressed by Krishnamurti. According to Vernon, Krishnamurti "believed, with good reason, that the sensationalism of his early story would cloud the public's perception of his {{interp|then}} current work".{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=227}} Krishnamurti himself gave the following description of his development to Rom Landau in 1935:
{{blockquote|
''Rom Landau'': How did you come to that state of unity with everything?
:
''Krishnamurti'': People have asked me about that before, and I always feel that they expect to hear the dramatic account of some sudden miracle through which I suddenly became one with the universe. Of course nothing of the sort happened. My inner awareness was always there; though it took me time to feel it more and more clearly; and equally it took time to find words that would at all describe it.<br>It was not a sudden flash, but a slow yet constant clarification of something that was always there. It did not grow, as people often think. Nothing can grow in us that is of spiritual importance. It has to be there in all its fullness, and then the only thing that happens is that we become more and more aware of it. It is our intellectual reaction and nothing else that needs time to become more articulate, more definite.{{sfnp|Landau|1939|p=286}}
}}


{{blockquote|The process at Ojai, whatever its cause or validity, was a cataclysmic milestone for Krishna. Up until this time his spiritual progress, chequered though it might have been, had been planned with solemn deliberation by Theosophy's grandees.&nbsp;... Something new had now occurred for which Krishna's training had not entirely prepared him.&nbsp;... A burden was lifted from his conscience and he took his first step towards becoming an individual.&nbsp;... In terms of his future role as a teacher, the process was his bedrock.&nbsp;... It had come to him alone and had not been planted in him by his mentors&nbsp;... it provided Krishna with the soil in which his newfound spirit of confidence and independence could take root.<ref>Vernon (2001), pp. 131–132.</ref>}}
However Krishnamurti often hinted at ''otherness''-like states in later talks and discussions:{{sfnp|Krishnamurti|1960|p=34}}{{sfnp|Krishnamurti|1963|p=27}} During Krishnamurti's later years, the nature and provenance of the continuing ''process'' often came up as a subject in private discussions between himself and associates, also stating that the experience of ''the otherness'' continued as he was nearing death. These discussions shed some light on the subject but were ultimately inconclusive.{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=133}}<ref group=lower-alpha name="jk-assoc">Some discussions with close associates are summarized or excerpted in {{harvnb|Lutyens|1983|pp=186, 224{{en dash}}231}}; {{harvnb|Jayakar|1986|pp=293, 364, 391{{en dash}}392, 409, 438{{en dash}}440}}; {{harvnb|Zimbalist|2014|loc=especially "Issue 29" forwards}}, contains numerous references; in such discussions, Krishnamurti is reputed to have often made tentative or ambiguous statements about his inner experiences and aspects of {{em|the otherness}}: "I don't know, and I don't ask" ({{harvp|Zimbalist|2014|loc=[http://inthepresenceofk.org/issues/issue-34/ "Issue 34"]}}. {{retrieved|access-date=2021-08-30|append=}}); reputedly he once said of his ''Notebook'' manuscript, "It's not my book. I didn't write it." ({{harvp|Zimbalist|2014|loc=[http://inthepresenceofk.org/issues/issue-31/ "Issue 31"]}}. {{retrieved|access-date=2021-08-30|append=}}); he believed that these experiences would stop once his physical condition deteriorated to the point where he could no longer travel and hold talks, and was mystified by the reputed continuing presence of {{em|the other}}, perceived while an invalid, days before his death ({{harvp|Zimbalist|2014|loc=[http://inthepresenceofk.org/issues/issue-89/ "Issue 89"]}}. {{retrieved|access-date=2021-10-01|append=}}).</ref>


As news of these mystical experiences spread, rumours concerning the [[Messianism|messianic]] status of Krishnamurti reached fever pitch as the 1925 Theosophical Society Convention was planned, on the 50th anniversary of its founding. There were expectations of significant happenings.<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 223.</ref> Paralleling the increasing adulation was Krishnamurti's growing discomfort with it. In related developments, prominent Theosophists and their factions within the Society were trying to position themselves favourably relative to the ''Coming'', which was widely rumoured to be approaching. He stated that "Too much of everything is bad". "Extraordinary" pronouncements of spiritual advancement were made by various parties, disputed by others, and the internal Theosophical politics further alienated Krishnamurti.<ref>Lutyens (1990), pp. 57–60.</ref>
Since the initial occurrences of 1922, several explanations have been proposed for these experiences of Krishnamurti's, including [[Ecstatic seizures|epilepsy]].{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=124-128}}{{efn-la|name="proces_explanation"}} Leadbeater and other Theosophists expected the "vehicle" to have certain [[paranormal]] experiences but were nevertheless mystified by these developments.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=163–4, 188–9}}


Nitya's persistent health problems had periodically resurfaced throughout this time. On 13 November 1925, at age 27, he died in Ojai from complications of [[influenza]] and tuberculosis.<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 219.</ref> Despite Nitya's poor health, his death was unexpected, and it fundamentally shook Krishnamurti's belief in Theosophy and in the leaders of the Theosophical Society. He had received their assurances regarding Nitya's health, and had come to believe that "Nitya was essential for [his] life-mission and therefore he would not be allowed to die," a belief shared by Annie Besant and Krishnamurti's circle.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 219, 221.</ref> Jayakar wrote that "his belief in the Masters and the hierarchy had undergone a total revolution."<ref name=Jayakar1986p69>Jayakar (1986), p. 69.</ref> Moreover, Nitya had been the "last surviving link to his family and childhood.&nbsp;... The only person to whom he could talk openly, his best friend and companion."<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 152.</ref> According to eyewitness accounts, the news "broke him completely."<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 220, 313 (note to p. 220).</ref> but 12 days after Nitya's death he was "immensely quiet, radiant, and free of all sentiment and emotion";<ref name=Jayakar1986p69 /> "there was not a shadow&nbsp;... to show what he had been through."<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 221.</ref>
====Growing expectations====
As news of these experiences spread, rumours concerning the [[Messianism|messianic]] status of Krishnamurti reached fever pitch as the 1925 Theosophical Society Convention was planned, on the 50th anniversary of its founding. There were expectations of significant happenings.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=223}} Paralleling the increasing adulation was Krishnamurti's growing discomfort with it. In related developments, prominent Theosophists and their factions within the Society were trying to position themselves favourably relative to the ''Coming'', which was widely rumoured to be approaching. He stated that "Too much of everything is bad". "Extraordinary" pronouncements of spiritual advancement were made by various parties, disputed by others, and the internal Theosophical politics further alienated Krishnamurti.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1990|p=57–60}}


===Break with the past===
====Death of Nitya====
Over the next few years, Krishnamurti's new vision and consciousness continued to develop. New concepts appeared in his talks, discussions, and correspondence, together with an evolving vocabulary that was progressively free of Theosophical terminology.<ref>Lutyens (1983c), p. 234.</ref> His new direction reached a climax in 1929, when he rebuffed attempts by Leadbeater and Besant to continue with the Order of the Star.
Nitya's persistent health problems had periodically resurfaced throughout this time. On 13 November 1925, at age 27, he died in Ojai from complications of [[influenza]] and tuberculosis.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=219}} Despite Nitya's poor health, his death was unexpected, and it fundamentally shook Krishnamurti's belief in Theosophy and in the leaders of the Theosophical Society. He had received their assurances regarding Nitya's health, and had come to believe that "Nitya was essential for [his] life-mission and therefore he would not be allowed to die," a belief shared by Annie Besant and Krishnamurti's circle.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=219, 221}} Jayakar wrote that "his belief in the Masters and the hierarchy had undergone a total revolution."{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=69}} Moreover, Nitya had been the "last surviving link to his family and childhood. ... The only person to whom he could talk openly, his best friend and companion."{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=152}} According to eyewitness accounts, the news "broke him completely."{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=220, 313 (note to p. 220)}} but 12&nbsp;days after Nitya's death he was "immensely quiet, radiant, and free of all sentiment and emotion";{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=69}} "there was not a shadow ... to show what he had been through."{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=221}}


Krishnamurti dissolved the Order during the annual [[#OSE|Star Camp]] at [[Ommen]], the [[Netherlands]], on 3 August 1929.<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 272.</ref> He stated that he had made his decision after "careful consideration" during the previous two years, and that:
===Break with the Theosophical Society===
Over the next few years, Krishnamurti's self-awareness and alienation from the Theosophical worldview continued to develop. He lost his faith in [[Ascended master|'The Masters']],<ref name=Algeo/> and new concepts appeared in his talks, discussions, and correspondence, together with an evolving vocabulary that was progressively free of Theosophical terminology.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983|p=234}} His new direction reached a climax in 1929, when he rebuffed attempts by Leadbeater and Besant to continue with the Order of the Star.


{{blockquote|text=I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce people along a particular path. ... This is no magnificent deed, because I do not want followers, and I mean this. The moment you follow someone you cease to follow Truth. I am not concerned whether you pay attention to what I say or not. I want to do a certain thing in the world and I am going to do it with unwavering concentration. I am concerning myself with only one essential thing: to set man free. I desire to free him from all cages, from all fears, and not to found religions, new sects, nor to establish new theories and new philosophies.<ref name=Krishnamurti1929 />}}
Krishnamurti dissolved the Order during the annual Star Camp at [[Ommen]], the [[Netherlands]], on 3 August 1929.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=272}} He stated that he had made his decision after "careful consideration" during the previous two years, and turned against the Theosophical Society's elaborate worldview of spiritual progress, stating that:
{{blockquote|text=I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce people along a particular path. ... This is no magnificent deed, because I do not want followers, and I mean this. The moment you follow someone you cease to follow Truth. I am not concerned whether you pay attention to what I say or not. I want to do a certain thing in the world and I am going to do it with unwavering concentration. I am concerning myself with only one essential thing: to set man free. I desire to free him from all cages, from all fears, and not to found religions, new sects, nor to establish new theories and new philosophies.{{sfnp|Krishnamurti|1929}}<ref name="v525">{{cite book | last=Lutyens | first=Mary | title=J. Krishnamurti: A Life | publisher=Penguin Books | year=2005 | isbn=978-0-14-400006-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jUmApIe_dbcC&pg=PA279 | access-date=7 July 2024 | page=279}}</ref>}}


[[File:Jiddu Krishnamurti by Witzel.jpg|thumb|Krishnamurti in the early 1920s]]
[[File:Jiddu Krishnamurti by Witzel.jpg|thumb|Krishnamurti in the early 1920s]]
Following the dissolution, prominent Theosophists turned against Krishnamurti, including Leadbeater who is said to have stated, "the Coming had gone wrong."<ref>Lutyens (1997), pp. 277–279.</ref> Krishnamurti had denounced all organised belief, the notion of [[guru]]s, and the whole teacher-follower relationship, vowing instead to work on setting people "absolutely, unconditionally free."<ref name=Krishnamurti1929>J. Krishnamurti (1929).</ref> There is no record of his explicitly denying he was the World Teacher;<ref>Vernon (2001), pp. 166–167.</ref> whenever he was asked to clarify his position he either asserted that the matter was irrelevant<ref>J. Krishnamurti (1972), p. 9. "I think we shall have incessant wrangles over the corpse of Krishnamurti if we discuss this or that, wondering who is now speaking. Someone asked me: 'Do tell me if it is you speaking or someone else'. I said: 'I really do not know and it does not matter'." From the 1927 "Question and answer session" at Ommen. [Note weblink in reference is ''not'' at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website].</ref> or gave answers that, as he stated, were "purposely vague".<ref>J. Krishnamurti (1928a), p. 43. "I am going to be purposely vague, because although I could quite easily make it definite, it is not my intention to do so. Because once you define a thing it becomes dead." Krishnamurti on the World Teacher, from "Who brings the truth," an address delivered at Ommen 2 August 1927. Note weblink in reference is ''not'' at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website. Link-specific content verified against original at [[New York Public Library Main Branch]], [http://catalog.nypl.org/record=b14583087 "YAM p.v. 519" [call no.].</ref>
Following the dissolution, prominent Theosophists turned against Krishnamurti, including Leadbeater who is said to have stated, "the Coming had gone wrong."{{sfnp|Lutyens|1997|p=277–279}} Krishnamurti had denounced all organised belief, the notion of [[guru]]s, and the whole teacher-follower relationship, vowing instead to work on setting people "absolutely, unconditionally free."{{sfnp|Krishnamurti|1929}} There is no record of his explicitly denying he was the World Teacher;{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=166–167}} whenever he was asked to clarify his position he either asserted that the matter was irrelevant,{{efn|{{harvp|Krishnamurti|1972|p=9}}: "I think we shall have incessant wrangles over the corpse of Krishnamurti if we discuss this or that, wondering who is now speaking. Someone asked me: 'Do tell me if it is you speaking or someone else'. I said: 'I really do not know and it does not matter'." From the 1927 "Question and answer session" at Ommen. (Note: weblink in reference is ''not'' at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website).}} or gave answers that, as he stated, were "purposely vague".{{efn-la|reference={{harvp|Krishnamurti|1928a|p=43}}: "I am going to be purposely vague, because although I could quite easily make it definite, it is not my intention to do so. Because once you define a thing it becomes dead." Krishnamurti on the World Teacher, from "Who brings the truth," an address delivered at Ommen 2 August 1927. (Note: weblink in reference is ''not'' at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website. Link-specific content verified against original at [[New York Public Library Main Branch]], [http://catalog.nypl.org/record=b14583087 "YAM p.v. 519" [call no.].}}
 
In hind-sight it can be seen that the ongoing changes in his outlook had begun before the dissolution of the Order of the Star.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=262}} The subtlety of the new distinctions on the World Teacher issue was lost on many of his admirers, who were already bewildered or distraught because of the changes in Krishnamurti's outlook, vocabulary and pronouncements–among them Besant and Mary Lutyens' mother Emily, who had a very close relationship with him.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=189}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|p=236}} He soon disassociated himself from the Theosophical Society and its teachings and practices,{{efn|
Lutyens considers the last remaining tie with Theosophy to have been severed in 1933, with the death of Besant. He had resigned from the Society in 1930.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1975|pp=276, 285}}
}} yet he remained on cordial terms with some of its members and ex-members throughout his life.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Schüller |first=Govert |title=Krishnamurti and the world teacher project: Some Theosophical perceptions |url=https://www.theosophyforward.com/pdf/Krishnamurti_and_the_World_teacher.pdf |journal=Theosophical History |volume=V |series=Theosophical History Occasional Papers |quote=After Annie Besant died in 1933 relations between Krishnamurti and the Theosophical Society were severed, although he would still have private contacts with individual members. |via=theosophyforward.com }}</ref>


In hind-sight it can be seen that the ongoing changes in his outlook had begun before the dissolution of the Order of the Star.<ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 262.</ref> The subtlety of the new distinctions on the World Teacher issue was lost on many of his admirers, who were already bewildered or distraught because of the changes in Krishnamurti's outlook, vocabulary and pronouncements–among them Besant and Mary Lutyens' mother Emily, who had a very close relationship with him.<ref>Vernon (2001), p. 189.</ref><ref>Lutyens (1975), p. 236.</ref> He soon disassociated himself from the Theosophical Society and its teachings and practices,{{efn|Lutyens considers the last remaining tie with Theosophy to have been severed in 1933, with the death of Besant. He had resigned from the Society in 1930 (Lutyens, 1975; pp. 276, 285).}} yet he remained on cordial terms with some of its members and ex-members throughout his life.{{citation needed|date=November 2011}}
Krishnamurti resigned from the various trusts and other organisations that were affiliated with the defunct Order of the Star, including the Theosophical Society. He returned the money and properties donated to the Order, among them a castle in the Netherlands and {{convert|5000|acre|ha|0}} of land, to their donors.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 276–284.</ref>


Krishnamurti often referred to the totality of his work as ''the'' teachings and not as ''my'' teachings.<ref>Lutyens (1990), p. 210. Emphasis in source.</ref>
===Middle years – ''Arya Vihara'' and extra-marital affair===
From 1930 through 1944 Krishnamurti engaged in speaking tours and in the issue of publications under the auspice of the "''Star Publishing Trust''" (SPT), which he had founded with Desikacharya Rajagopal, a close associate and friend from the ''Order of the Star''.{{efn|Born in India in 1900 and of Brahmin descent, Rajagopal had moved in Krishnamurti's circle since early youth. Although regarded as an excellent editor and organizer, he was also known for his difficult personality and high-handed manner. Upon Nitya's death, he had promised Besant that he would look after Krishnamurti. See Henri Methorst, ''Krishnamurti A Spiritual Revolutionary'', Edwin Publishing House, 2003, ch 12.}} Ojai was the base of operations for the new enterprise, where Krishnamurti, Rajagopal, and Rosalind Williams (who had married Rajagopal in 1927) resided in the house known as ''Arya Vihara'' (meaning ''Realm of the Aryas'', i.e. those noble by righteousness in [[Sanskrit]]). The business and organizational aspects of the SPT were administered chiefly by D. Rajagopal, as Krishnamurti devoted his time to speaking and meditation.{{sfnp|Sloss|1991|p=ch. 12}}


Krishnamurti resigned from the various trusts and other organisations that were affiliated with the defunct Order of the Star, including the Theosophical Society. He returned the money and properties donated to the Order, among them a castle in the Netherlands and {{convert|5000|acre|ha|0}} of land, to their donors.<ref>Lutyens (1975), pp. 276–284.</ref>
The Rajagopals' marriage was not a happy one, and the two became physically estranged after the 1931 birth of their daughter, Radha.{{sfnp|Sloss|1991|p=ch. 12}} Krishnamurti's friendship with Rosalind became a love affair. According to Radha Rajagopal Sloss, the affair between Krishnamurti and Rosalind began in 1932 and it endured for about twenty-five years. Radha Sloss, daughter of Rajagopal, wrote about the affair in her book ''[[Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti]]''.{{efn|Radha's account of the relationship, ''Lives in the Shadow With J. Krishnamurti'', was first published in England by Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd. in 1991, and was soon followed by a rebuttal volume written by Mary Lutyens, ''Krishnamurti and the Rajagopals'', Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1996, in which she acknowledges the relationship but was never confirmed by Krishnamurti himself.<br>Mark Lee: "I heard it from Erna Lillifelt, who learned it from Krishnaji. Krishnaji has told Mary Zimbalist and Erna Lilliefelt that there was something that Rajagopal had against him. They asked him what it was. And he said 'I had sexual relations with that woman'." See {{harvp|Padmanabhan|2015|p=ch.&nbsp;8}}.}} According to Radha Rajagopal Sloss, Krishnamurti was dependent on his followers to support his way of life, and needed to uphold his image of a celibate guru to continue this support and way of life.<ref name=Tworkov_1991>{{cite magazine |first=Helen |last=Tworkov |year=1991 |url=https://tricycle.org/magazine/the-shadow-side-krishnamurti/ |title=The shadow side of Krishnamurti |magazine=[[TriCycle Magazine]] }}</ref>{{efn|The two also shared an interest in education: Krishnamurti helped to raise Radha, and the need to provide her with a suitable educational environment led to the founding of the ''Happy Valley School'' in 1946. The school has since re-established itself as an independent institution operating as the {{cite web |title=Besant Hill School Of Happy Valley |url=http://www.besanthill.org/ }}. See {{harvp|Sloss|1991a|at=ch 19}}.
}}


===Middle years===
During the 1930s Krishnamurti spoke in Europe, Latin America, India, Australia and the United States. He did not speak publicly for a period of about four years (between 1940 and 1944). During this time he lived and worked at ''Arya Vihara'', which during the war operated as a largely self-sustaining farm, with its surplus goods donated for relief efforts in Europe.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=210}} Of the years spent in Ojai during the war he later said: : "I think it was a period of no challenge, no demand, no outgoing. I think it was a kind of everything held in; and when I left Ojai it all burst."{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=98}}
From 1930 through 1944 Krishnamurti engaged in speaking tours and in the issue of publications under the auspice of the "''Star Publishing Trust''" (SPT), which he had founded with Desikacharya Rajagopal, a close associate and friend from the ''Order of the Star''.{{efn|Born in India in 1900 and of Brahmin descent, Rajagopal had moved in Krishnamurti's circle since early youth. Although regarded as an excellent editor and organizer, he was also known for his difficult personality and high-handed manner. Upon Nitya's death, he had promised Besant that he would look after Krishnamurti. See Henri Methorst, ''Krishnamurti A Spiritual Revolutionary'', Edwin Publishing House, 2003, ch 12.}} Ojai was the base of operations for the new enterprise, where Krishnamurti, Rajagopal, and Rosalind Williams (who had married Rajagopal in 1927) resided in the house known as ''Arya Vihara'' (meaning ''Realm of the Aryas'', i.e. those noble by righteousness in [[Sanskrit]]). The business and organizational aspects of the SPT were administered chiefly by D. Rajagopal, as Krishnamurti devoted his time to speaking and meditation. The Rajagopals' marriage was not a happy one, and the two became physically estranged after the 1931 birth of their daughter, Radha.<ref>''Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti'' by Radha Rajagopal Sloss, Bloomsbury Publishing, 1991, ch 12.</ref>  Krishnamurti's friendship with Rosalind became a love affair. According to Radha Rajagopal Sloss, the affair between Krishnamurti and Rosalind began in 1932 and it endured for about twenty-five years.{{efn|The two also shared an interest in education: Krishnamurti helped to raise Radha, and the need to provide her with a suitable educational environment led to the founding of the ''Happy Valley School'' in 1946. The school has since re-established itself as an independent institution operating as the [http://www.besanthill.org/ Besant Hill School Of Happy Valley]. See Sloss, "Lives in the Shadow," ch 19.}}{{efn|Radha's account of the relationship, ''Lives in the Shadow With J. Krishnamurti'', was first published in England by Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd. in 1991, and was soon followed by a rebuttal volume written by Mary Lutyens, ''Krishnamurti and the Rajagopals'', Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1996, in which she acknowledges the relationship but was never confirmed by Krishnamurti himself.}}{{efn|Mark Lee: I heard it from Erna Lillifelt, who learned it from Krishnaji. Krishnaji has told Mary Zimbalist and Erna Lilliefelt that there was something that Rajagopal had against him. They asked him what it was. And he said "I had sexual relations with that woman". See Padmanabhan Krishna, "A jewel on a silver platter", Ch 8.}} Radha Sloss, daughter of Rajagopal, wrote about the affair in her book ''[[Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti]]''.


During the 1930s Krishnamurti spoke in Europe, Latin America, India, Australia and the United States. In 1938 he met [[Aldous Huxley]].<ref>Vernon, "Star in the East," p 205.</ref> The two began a close friendship which endured for many years. They held common concerns about the imminent conflict in Europe which they viewed as the outcome of the pernicious influence of nationalism.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.journal.kfionline.org/issue-1/aldous-huxley-and-krishnamurti | title = Journal of the Krishnamurti Schools | access-date = 4 June 2018}}</ref> Krishnamurti's stance on [[World War II]] was often construed as pacifism and even [[subversion]] during a time of patriotic fervor in the United States and for a time he came under the surveillance of the [[FBI]].<ref>Vernon, "Star in the East," p 209.</ref> He did not speak publicly for a period of about four years (between 1940 and 1944). During this time he lived and worked at ''Arya Vihara'', which during the war operated as a largely self-sustaining farm, with its surplus goods donated for relief efforts in Europe.<ref>Vernon, "Star in the East," p 210.</ref> Of the years spent in Ojai during the war he later said: "I think it was a period of no challenge, no demand, no outgoing. I think it was a kind of everything held in; and when I left Ojai it all burst."<ref>Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" p 98.</ref>
English author [[Aldous Huxley]] lived nearby; he met Krishnamurti in 1938,{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003|p=45-46}} and the two men became close friends.{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003|p=46, 47-48}}{{sfnp|Williams|2004|p=260-261}} They held common concerns about the imminent conflict in Europe which they viewed as the outcome of the pernicious influence of nationalism.<ref name="kfion">{{cite web | url = http://www.journal.kfionline.org/issue-1/aldous-huxley-and-krishnamurti | title = Journal of the Krishnamurti Schools | access-date = 4 June 2018}}</ref> Krishnamurti's stance on [[World War II]] was often construed as pacifism and even [[subversion]] during a time of patriotic fervor in the United States and for a time he came under the surveillance of the [[FBI]].{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=209}}


Krishnamurti broke the hiatus from public speaking in May 1944 with a series of talks in Ojai. These talks, and subsequent material, were published by "''Krishnamurti Writings Inc.''" (KWINC), the successor organisation to the "''Star Publishing Trust''." This was to be the new central Krishnamurti-related entity worldwide, whose sole purpose was the dissemination of the teaching.<ref>Lutyens, "Fulfillment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 59-60. Initially, Krishnamurti (along with Rajagopal and others) was a trustee of KWINC. Eventually he ceased being a trustee, leaving Rajagopal as President–a turn of events that according to Lutyens, constituted ''"... a circumstance that was to have most unhappy consequences."''</ref> He had remained in contact with associates from India, and in the autumn of 1947 embarked on a speaking tour there, attracting a new following of young intellectuals.{{efn|These included former freedom campaigners from the Indian Independence Movement, See Vernon, "Star in the East," p 219.}} On this trip he encountered the Mehta sisters, Pupul and Nandini, who became lifelong associates and confidants. The sisters also attended to Krishnamurti throughout a 1948 recurrence of the "''process''" in [[Ooty|Ootacamund]].<ref>See Jayakar, "Krishnamurti," ch 11 for Pupul Mehta's (later Jayakar) eyewitness account.</ref> In [[Poona]] in 1948, Krishnamurti met [[B. K. S. Iyengar|Iyengar]], who taught him [[Asana|Yoga practices]] every morning for the next three months, then on and off for twenty years.<ref>Elliot Goldberg, ''The Path of Modern Yoga'' (Rochester VT: Inner Traditions 2016), p. 380.</ref>
Huxley encouraged Krishnamurti to write,{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003|p=59}} and also introduced his work to [[Harper (publisher)|Harper]], Huxley's own publisher. This eventually led to the addition of Krishnamurti in the publisher's roster of authors;{{nnbsp}}{{sfnp|Sloss|2011|p=252}} Radha Rajagopal Sloss, daughter of D. Rajagopal, Krishnamurti's business manager at the time, states that Huxley introduced her father to the publisher. She adds that Krishnamurti had little interest in his manuscripts or other records of his work; this lack of interest by Krishnamurti is also remarked upon by his biographers.{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003|pp=87{{en dash}}88}} Until that time Krishnamurti works were published by [[Small press|small or specialist presses]], or in-house by a variety of Krishnamurti-related {{nobr|organizations.{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|pp=199, 224–225}}{{refn|name="sw1974&1998"|{{harvs|nb=yes|last=Weeraperuma|year1=1974|year2=1998|loc1={{pp.|3|53}}|loc2={{pp.|1|30}}}}. {{interp|In both titles the pages comprise "Part One: Works by Krishnamurti"}}.}}}}


When Krishnamurti was in India after World War II many prominent personalities came to meet him, including Prime Minister [[Jawaharlal Nehru]]. In his meetings with Nehru, Krishnamurti elaborated at length on the teachings, saying in one instance, "Understanding of the self only arises in relationship, in watching yourself in relationship to people, ideas, and things; to trees, the earth, and the world around you and within you. Relationship is the mirror in which the self is revealed. Without self-knowledge there is no basis for right thought and action." Nehru asked, "How does one start?" to which Krishnamurti replied, "Begin where you are. Read every word, every phrase, every paragraph of the mind, as it operates through thought."<ref>Jayakar, "Krishnamurti," p 142.</ref>
Krishnamurti broke the hiatus from public speaking in May&nbsp;1944 with a series of talks in [[Ojai, California|Ojai]]. These talks, and subsequent material, were published by "''Krishnamurti Writings Inc.''" (KWINC), the successor organisation to the "''Star Publishing Trust''". This was to be the new central Krishnamurti-related entity worldwide, whose sole purpose was the dissemination of the teaching.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983b|p=59-60}} Initially, Krishnamurti (along with Rajagopal and others) was a trustee of KWINC. Eventually he ceased being a trustee, leaving Rajagopal as President – a turn of events that according to Lutyens, constituted ''"...&nbsp;a circumstance that was to have most unhappy consequences."'' He had remained in contact with associates from India, and in the autumn of 1947 embarked on a speaking tour there, attracting a new following of young intellectuals.{{efn|These included former freedom campaigners from the Indian Independence Movement, See {{harvp|Vernon|2001|p=219}} }} On this trip he encountered the Mehta sisters, Pupul and Nandini, who became lifelong associates and confidants. The sisters also attended to Krishnamurti throughout a 1948 recurrence of the "''process''" in [[Ooty|Ootacamund]].<ref>See {{harvp|Jayakar|1986|p=ch. 11}} for Pupul Mehta's (later Jayakar) eyewitness account.</ref> In [[Poona]] in 1948, Krishnamurti met [[B. K. S. Iyengar|Iyengar]], who taught him [[Asana|Yoga practices]] every morning for the next three months, then on and off for twenty years.<ref>Elliot Goldberg, ''The Path of Modern Yoga'' (Rochester VT: Inner Traditions 2016), p. 380.</ref>


===Later years===
===Later years – wider recognition, legal battles, and final evaluation===
Krishnamurti continued speaking in public lectures, group discussions and with concerned individuals around the world. He met with many prominent religious leaders and scholars including [[Swami Venkatesananda]], [[Anandamayi Ma]], [[Lakshman Joo]], [[Walpola Rahula]], and Eugene Schalert. In India he also met with many sanyasis and monks throughout his life. In the early 1960s, he made the acquaintance of physicist [[David Bohm]], whose philosophical and scientific concerns regarding the [[essence]] of the physical world, and the psychological and sociological state of mankind, found parallels in Krishnamurti's philosophy. The two men soon became close friends and started a common inquiry, in the form of personal dialogues–and occasionally in group discussions with other participants–that continued, periodically, over nearly two decades.{{efn|Bohm would eventually serve as a [[#External links|Krishnamurti Foundation]] trustee.}} Several of these discussions were published in the form of books or as parts of books, and introduced a wider audience (among scientists) to Krishnamurti's ideas.<ref>See [[#List of Books|Selected Publications/List of Books]] subsection.</ref> Although Krishnamurti's philosophy delved into fields as diverse as religious studies, education, psychology, physics, and consciousness studies, he was not then, nor since, well known in academic circles. Nevertheless, Krishnamurti met and held discussions with physicists [[Fritjof Capra]] and [[E. C. George Sudarshan]], biologist [[Rupert Sheldrake]], psychiatrist David Shainberg, as well as psychotherapists representing various theoretical orientations.<ref>See ''On Krishnamurti'', by Raymond Martin, Wadsworth, 2003, for a discussion on Krishnamurti and the academic world.</ref> The long friendship with Bohm went through a rocky interval in later years, and although they overcame their differences and remained friends until Krishnamurti's death, the relationship did not regain its previous intensity.{{citation needed|date=July 2013}}{{efn|Their falling out was partly due to questions about Krishnamurti's private behaviour, especially his long and secret love affair with Rosalind Williams-Rajagopal, then unknown to the general public.{{citation needed|date=July 2013}}}}{{efn|After their falling out, Bohm criticised certain aspects of the teaching on philosophical, [[Methodology|methodological]], and psychological grounds. He also criticised what he described as Krishnamurti's occasional "verbal manipulations" when deflecting challenges. Eventually, he questioned some of the reasoning about the nature of thought and self, although he never abandoned his belief that "Krishnamurti was onto something". See ''Infinite Potential: The Life and times of David Bohm'', by [[F. David Peat]], Addison Wesley, 1997.}}
Krishnamurti continued speaking in public lectures, group discussions and with concerned individuals around the world. In 1954 ''[[The First and Last Freedom]]'' was published, which was instrumental in broadening Krishnamurti's audience and exposing his ideas. It was one of the first Krishnamurti titles in the world of mainstream, commercial publishing, where its success helped establish him as a viable author. It consists of edited excerpts from his public talks and discussions, and includes examinations of subjects that were, or became, recurrent themes in his exposition:{{nnbsp}}{{sfnm|1a1=Fausset|1y=1954|2a1=Weeraperuma|2y=1998|2pp=vii{{en dash}}viii}} the nature of the self{{spaced en dash}} and of belief, investigations into fear and desire, the relationship between thinker and thought, the concept of [[choiceless awareness]], the function of the mind, etc.


In the 1970s, Krishnamurti met several times with then Indian prime minister [[Indira Gandhi]], with whom he had far-ranging, and in some cases, very serious conversations. Jayakar considers his message in meetings with Indira Gandhi as a possible influence in the lifting of certain emergency measures Gandhi had imposed during periods of political turmoil.<ref>See Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" pages 340–343.</ref>
In the early 1960s, he made the acquaintance of physicist [[David Bohm]], whose philosophical and scientific concerns regarding the [[essence]] of the physical world, and the psychological and sociological state of mankind, found parallels in Krishnamurti's philosophy. The two men soon became close friends and started a common inquiry, in the form of personal dialogues–and occasionally in group discussions with other participants–that continued, periodically, over nearly two decades.{{efn|Bohm would eventually serve as a [[#External links|Krishnamurti Foundation]] trustee.}} Several of these discussions were published in the form of books or as parts of books, and introduced a wider audience (among scientists) to Krishnamurti's ideas. The long friendship with Bohm went through a rocky interval in later years, and although they overcame their differences and remained friends until Krishnamurti's death, the relationship did not regain its previous intensity.{{citation needed|date=July 2013}}{{efn|Their falling out was partly due to questions about Krishnamurti's private behaviour, especially his long and secret love affair with Rosalind Williams-Rajagopal, then unknown to the general public. After their falling out, Bohm criticised certain aspects of the teaching on philosophical, [[Methodology|methodological]], and psychological grounds. He also criticised what he described as Krishnamurti's occasional "verbal manipulations" when deflecting challenges. Eventually, he questioned some of the reasoning about the nature of thought and self, although he never abandoned his belief that "Krishnamurti was onto something". See ''Infinite Potential: The Life and times of David Bohm'', by [[F. David Peat]], Addison Wesley, 1997.}}


Meanwhile, Krishnamurti's once close relationship with the Rajagopals had deteriorated to the point where he took D. Rajagopal to court to recover donated property and funds as well as publication rights for his works, manuscripts, and personal correspondence, that were in Rajagopal's possession.{{efn|D. Rajagopal was the head or co-head of a number of successive corporations and trusts, set up after the dissolution of the ''Order of the Star'' and chartered to publish Krishnamurti's talks, discussions and other writings.}} The litigation and ensuing cross complaints, which formally began in 1971, continued for many years. Much property and materials were returned to Krishnamurti during his lifetime; the parties to this case finally settled all other matters in 1986, shortly after his death.{{efn|''Formation of the Krishnamurti Foundation of America and the Lawsuits Which Took Place Between 1968 and 1986 to Recover Assets for Krishnamurti's Work'', by Erna Lilliefelt, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1995. The complicated settlement dissolved the ''K & R Foundation'' (a previous entity), and transferred assets to the ''Krishnamurti Foundation of America'' (KFA). However certain disputed documents remained in the possession of Rajagopal, and he received partial repayment for his attorney's fees.}}
Krishnamurti's once close relationship with the Rajagopals had deteriorated to the point where he took D. Rajagopal to court to recover donated property and funds as well as publication rights for his works, manuscripts, and personal correspondence, that were in Rajagopal's possession.{{efn|D. Rajagopal was the head or co-head of a number of successive corporations and trusts, set up after the dissolution of the ''Order of the Star'' and chartered to publish Krishnamurti's talks, discussions and other writings.}} The litigation and ensuing cross complaints, which formally began in 1971, continued for many years. Much property and materials were returned to Krishnamurti during his lifetime; the parties to this case finally settled all other matters in 1986, shortly after his death.{{efn|''Formation of the Krishnamurti Foundation of America and the Lawsuits Which Took Place Between 1968 and 1986 to Recover Assets for Krishnamurti's Work'', by Erna Lilliefelt, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1995. The complicated settlement dissolved the ''K & R Foundation'' (a previous entity), and transferred assets to the ''Krishnamurti Foundation of America'' (KFA). However certain disputed documents remained in the possession of Rajagopal, and he received partial repayment for his attorney's fees.}} Krishnamurti' stance raised doubts in long-time friends and devotees, some of whom got the impression that he was a divided personality unable to live according to his own teachings{{sfnp|Sloss|1991|p=297-298, 300-301}} – raising the question: "If he cannot live it, who can?"{{sfnp|Sloss|1991|p=301}}


In 1984 and 1985, Krishnamurti spoke to an invited audience at the United Nations in New York, under the auspices of the [[Pacem in terris|Pacem in Terris Society]] chapter at the United Nations.<ref>Lutyens, "The Open Door," p 84-85. Also Lutyens, "The Life and Death of Krishnamurti," p. 185.</ref> In October 1985, he visited India for the last time, holding a number of what came to be known as "farewell" talks and discussions between then and January 1986. These last talks included the fundamental questions he had been asking through the years, as well as newer concerns about advances in science and technology, and their effect on humankind. Krishnamurti had commented to friends that he did not wish to invite death, but was not sure how long his body would last (he had already lost considerable weight), and once he could no longer talk, he would have "no further purpose". In his final talk, on 4 January 1986, in Madras, he again invited the audience to examine with him the nature of [[inquiry]], the effect of technology, the nature of life and meditation, and the nature of [[Creation myth|creation]].{{citation needed|date=July 2013}}
In 1984 and 1985, Krishnamurti spoke to an invited audience at the United Nations in New York, under the auspices of the [[Pacem in terris|Pacem in Terris Society]] chapter at the United Nations.{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003a|p=84-85}}{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003|p=185}} In October 1985, he visited India for the last time, holding a number of what came to be known as "farewell" talks and discussions between then and January 1986. These last talks included the fundamental questions he had been asking through the years, as well as newer concerns about advances in science and technology, and their effect on humankind. Krishnamurti had commented to friends that he did not wish to invite death, but was not sure how long his body would last (he had already lost considerable weight), and once he could no longer talk, he would have "no further purpose". In his final talk, on 4 January 1986, in Madras, he again invited the audience to examine with him the nature of [[inquiry]], the effect of technology, the nature of life and meditation, and the nature of [[Creation myth|creation]].{{citation needed|date=July 2013}}


Krishnamurti was also concerned about his legacy, about being unwittingly turned into some personage whose teachings had been handed down to special individuals, rather than the world at large. He did not want anybody to pose as an interpreter of the teaching.<ref>Lutyens, "Fulfilment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 171, statement of Krishnamurti published in the Foundation Bulletin, 1970.</ref> He warned his associates on several occasions that they were not to present themselves as spokesmen on his behalf, or as his successors after his death.<ref>Lutyens, "Fulfilment," Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 233.</ref>
Krishnamurti was also concerned about his legacy, about being unwittingly turned into some personage whose teachings had been handed down to special individuals, rather than the world at large. He did not want anybody to pose as an interpreter of the teaching.<ref name=Lutyens-fulfilment>{{cite book |last=Lutyens |title=Fulfilment |publisher=Farrar, Straus |edition=hardcover |page=171, 233 }}—statement of Krishnamurti published in the Foundation Bulletin, 1970.</ref>{{rp|p=171}} He warned his associates on several occasions that they were not to present themselves as spokesmen on his behalf, or as his successors after his death.<ref name=Lutyens-fulfilment/>{{rp|p=233}}


A few days before his death, in a final statement, he declared that nobody among either his associates or the general public had understood what had happened to him (as the conduit of the teaching). He added that the "supreme intelligence" operating in his body would be gone with his death, again implying the impossibility of successors. However, he stated that people could perhaps get into touch with that somewhat "if they live the teachings".<ref>See Lutyens, "The Life and Death of Krishnamurti," London: John Murray, p 206. Quoting Krishnamurti from tape-recording made on 7 February 1986.</ref> In prior discussions, he had compared himself with [[Thomas Edison]], implying that he did the hard work, and now all that was needed by others was a flick of the switch.<ref>Lutyens, "Fulfilment" Farrar, Straus hardcover, p 119.</ref>
A few days before his death, in a final statement, possibly in response to a question by Mary Cadogan, he stated an 'immense energy and intelligence went through this body." Nobody had understood what his body went through, and after his death, this consciousness would be gone, and no other body would support it "for many hundred years." He further added that "Perhaps they will somewhat if they live the teachings. But nobody has done it. Nobody. And so that's that."{{efn|name="nobody"}}


==Death==
===Death===
Krishnamurti died of [[pancreatic cancer]] on 17 February 1986, at the age of 90. The announcement of KFT ([[Krishnamurti Foundation|Krishnamurti Foundation Trust]]) refers to the course of his health condition until the moment of death. The first signs came almost nine months before his death, when he felt very tired. In October 1985, he went from England (Brockwood Park School) to India and after that, he suffered from exhaustion, fevers, and lost weight. Krishnamurti decided to go back to Ojai (10 January 1986) after his last talks in [[Madras, India|Madras]], which necessitated a 24-hour flight. Once he arrived at Ojai he underwent medical tests that revealed he was suffering from pancreatic cancer. The cancer was untreatable, either surgically or otherwise, so Krishnamurti decided to go back to his home at Ojai, where he spent his last days. Friends and professionals nursed him. His mind was clear until the last moment. Krishnamurti died on 17 February 1986, at 10 minutes past midnight, [[Pacific Time Zone|California time]]. In accordance with his wishes, no memorial service was conducted.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Saxon|first=Wolfgang|date=1986-02-18|title=JIDDU KRISHNAMURTI, 90, IS DEAD; RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHER FROM INDIA|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1986/02/18/obituaries/jiddu-krishnamurti-90-is-dead-religious-philosopher-from-india.html|access-date=2022-01-21|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Jiddu Krishnamurti |url=http://www.meditativediaries.com/jiddu-krishnamurti/ |date=17 Feb 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160221032207/http://www.meditativediaries.com/jiddu-krishnamurti/ |archive-date=21 February 2016 |website=meditativediaries.com |url-status=dead |access-date=18 February 2016 }}</ref> His ashes were divided into three parts: for Ojai, India and England. In India they were immersed in River Ganga in Varanasi, Gangotri, and in the ocean Adayar beach.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Jayakar|first=Pupul|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uZWYAAAAQBAJ&dq=jiddu+krishnamurti+ashes+in+river+ganga+and+himalayas&pg=PT600|title=J. Krishnamurti: A Biography|date=2000-10-14|publisher=Penguin UK|isbn=978-93-5118-284-9|language=en}}</ref>
Krishnamurti died of [[pancreatic cancer]] on 17&nbsp;February 1986, at the age of 90. The announcement of KFT ([[Krishnamurti Foundation|Krishnamurti Foundation Trust]]) refers to the course of his health condition until the moment of death. The first signs came almost nine months before his death, when he felt very tired. In October 1985, he went from [[Bramdean]], England ([[Brockwood Park|Brockwood Park School]]) to India and after that, he suffered from exhaustion, fevers, and lost weight. Krishnamurti decided to go back to Ojai (10 January 1986) after his last talks in [[Madras, India|Madras]], which necessitated a 24-hour flight. Once he arrived at Ojai he underwent medical tests that revealed he was suffering from pancreatic cancer. The cancer was untreatable, either surgically or otherwise, so Krishnamurti decided to go back to his home at Ojai, where he spent his last days. Friends and professionals nursed him. His mind was clear until the last moment. Krishnamurti died on 17&nbsp;February 1986, at 10&nbsp;minutes past midnight, [[Pacific Time Zone|California time]]. In accordance with his wishes, no memorial service was conducted.<ref name=Saxon>{{Cite news |last=Saxon |first=Wolfgang |date=18 February 1986 |title=Jiddu Krishnamurti, 90, is dead; religious philosopher from India |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |issn=0362-4331 |type=obituary |lang=en-US |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1986/02/18/obituaries/jiddu-krishnamurti-90-is-dead-religious-philosopher-from-india.html |access-date=21 January 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Jiddu Krishnamurti |date=17 February 2016 |website=meditativediaries.com |url-status=usurped |access-date=18 February 2016 |url=http://www.meditativediaries.com/jiddu-krishnamurti/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160221032207/http://www.meditativediaries.com/jiddu-krishnamurti/ |archive-date=21 February 2016 }}</ref> His ashes were divided into three parts: For Ojai, India, and England. In India they were immersed in River Ganga in Varanasi, Gangotri, and in the ocean Adayar beach.{{sfnp|Jayakar|2000}}


==Schools==
==Schools==
[[File:Jiddu Krishnamurti 1987 stamp of India.jpg|thumb|Krishnamurti on a 1987 stamp of India]]
[[File:Jiddu Krishnamurti 1987 stamp of India.jpg|thumb|Krishnamurti on a 1987 Indian stamp]]
Krishnamurti founded five schools in India, one in England, Brockwood Park School, and one in California, Oak Grove School. When asked, he enumerated the following as his educational aims:
#''Global outlook'': A vision of the whole as distinct from the part; there should never be a [[Sectarianism|sectarian]] outlook, but always a holistic outlook free from all prejudice.
#''Concern for man and the environment'': Humanity is part of nature, and if nature is not cared for, it will [[boomerang]] on man. Only the right education, and deep affection between people everywhere, will resolve many problems including the environmental challenges.
#''Religious spirit, which includes the scientific temper'': The religious mind is alone, not lonely. It is in communion with people and nature.<ref>See ''As The River Joins The Ocean: Reflections about J. Krishnamurti'', by Giddu Narayan, Edwin House Publishing 1999, p 64.</ref>


The [[Krishnamurti Foundations]], established in India, USA, and England in the 1960's manage seven schools in India and abroad.
Krishnamurti founded five schools in India, the oldest being Rishi Valley School that he founded in 1928 in Andhra Pradesh, ten miles from Madanapalle, his birthplace.{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003|p=26}} He also founded one in England, [[Brockwood Park|Brockwood Park School]] in 1969,{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003|p=226}} and one in California, [[Oak Grove School (Ojai, California)|Oak Grove School]]. When asked, he enumerated the following as his educational aims:
# ''Global outlook'': A vision of the whole as distinct from the part; there should never be a [[Sectarianism|sectarian]] outlook, but always a holistic outlook free from all prejudice.
# ''Concern for man and the environment'': Humanity is part of nature, and if nature is not cared for, it will [[boomerang]] on man. Only the right education, and deep affection between people everywhere, will resolve many problems including the environmental challenges.
# ''Religious spirit, which includes the scientific temper'': The religious mind is alone, not lonely. It is in communion with people and nature.<ref>See ''As The River Joins The Ocean: Reflections about J. Krishnamurti'', by Giddu Narayan, Edwin House Publishing 1999, p 64.</ref>


==Influence==
The [[Krishnamurti Foundations]], established in India, USA, and England in the 1960s manage seven schools in India and abroad.
[[File:KFI retreat at Rishi Valley.jpg|thumb|alt=KFI retreat at Rishi Valley |KFI retreat session at Rishi Valley on 2019 November 17  Padmanabhan Krishna addressing the gathering, with [[Radhika Herzberger]] presiding]]
[[File:Jiddu Krishnamurti house - Study center.jpg|alt=House at Madanpalle, being used as Study Center.|thumb|Jiddu Krishnamurthy House at Madanapalle in which Krishnamurti was born, being used as Study Center.]]
Krishnamurti attracted the interest of the mainstream religious establishment in India. He engaged in discussions with several well known Hindu and Buddhist scholars and leaders, including the [[Dalai Lama]].{{efn| The Dalai Lama characterised Krishnamurti as a ''"great soul"'' (Jayakar, "Krishnamurti" p 203). Krishnamurti very much enjoyed the Lama's company and by his own admission could not bring up his anti-guru views, mindful of the Lama's feelings.}} Several of these discussions were later published as chapters in various Krishnamurti books.


Krishnamurti was very highly regarded by several leading religious figures in India. [[Nisargadatta Maharaj]] described Krishnamurti as 'complete [[Brahman]]'.<ref>"I am Unborn (Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj)", Page 100, Chapter 45.</ref> [[Anandamayi Ma]] addressed him as the 'Guru of gurus'.<ref>Jayakar, Pupul (1986). Krishnamurti:A biography, page 144</ref> When [[Ramana Maharshi]] was asked why Krishnamurti dissolved the Order of the Star in the East, he replied "The Order's purpose stood consummated in that the World Teacher had arrived; that is why it was dissolved."<ref>Blutkeim, Aham Sphurana: Scintillations of Jnana from Sri Ramana Maharishi, page 408.</ref>
=='The teaching' – self-observation and 'vast emptiness'==
{{See also|Krishnamurti's Notebook#About the work|Choiceless awareness|Aphantasia|l1=The otherness|l2=Choiceless awareness|l3=Aphantasia}}


Notable individuals influenced by Krishnamurti include [[George Bernard Shaw]], [[David Bohm]], [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], the [[14th Dalai Lama|Dalai Lama]], [[Aldous Huxley]], [[Alan Watts]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vjshtqhddg|title=Alan Watts talking about Jiddu Krishnamurti &#124; He was an Extraordinary Mystic|website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref> [[Henry Miller]], [[Bruce Lee]],<ref>https://jkrishnamurti.org/sites/default/files/Robert-Colet-Bruce-Lee.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> [[Terence Stamp]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdB-OMnjaMc&list=PLnUHGKHE-_MFi1IC_7XMPUudeIz0GRIez&index=21|title = Terence Stamp speaking at the Krishnamurti Centre|website = [[YouTube]]}}</ref> [[Jackson Pollock]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/culture/pollock.htm, |title= Jackson Pollock (By L. Proyect)|website=www.columbia.edu |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200928210718/http://www.columbia.edu/%7Elnp3/mydocs/culture/pollock.htm |archive-date=28 September 2020}}</ref> [[Toni Packer]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lionsroar.com/remembering-meditation-teacher-toni-packer-1927-2013-2/|title=Remembering meditation teacher Toni Packer (1927–2013) – Lion's Roar|date=24 August 2013 }}</ref> [[Achyut Patwardhan]],<ref name="independent">{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-achyut-patwardhan-1541827.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220608/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-achyut-patwardhan-1541827.html |archive-date=8 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Obituary: Achyut Patwardhan|website=The Independent|date=23 October 2011|access-date=28 November 2017}}</ref> [[Dada Dharmadhikari]],<ref name="mkgandhi-sarvodaya">{{cite web|url=http://www.mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org/dharma/dharmabio.htm|website=mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org|title=Dada Dharmadhikari Biography|access-date=28 November 2017|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111109114350/http://mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org/dharma/dharmabio.htm|archive-date=9 November 2011}}</ref> [[Derek Trucks]], <ref>{{Cite web |last=Horowitz |first=Scott |date=2018-07-03 |title=INTERVIEW: Derek Trucks Talks New Album, 2017 Losses, & The New Generation |url=https://liveforlivemusic.com/news/interview-derek-trucks-2018-interview/ |access-date=2023-06-08 |website=L4LM |language=en-US}}</ref> and [[Eckhart Tolle]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Y2yOZGgHuY|title=Through the Eyes of Krishnamurti|website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref>
A keen observer of the beauty of nature, Krishnamurti had strong convictions about the brutality and self-destruction of humanity, urging for an [[Ethical intuitionism|immediate righteousness without conceptual deliberations and thought]].{{efn|name="immediatism"|
Krishnamurti, ''the flame of attention'', p.107:
:
"Goodness means a way of life which is righteousness, not in terms of religion, or morality or an ethical concept of righteousness, but in terms of one who sees that which is true and that which is false, and sustains that quality of sensitivity that sees it immediate and acts."
}}
In Krishnamurti's perception, such a [[righteousness]] was only possible through a radical transformation of the mind, wholeheartedly but with detachment observing its workings and limitations.{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=26-29}} He was convinced that he was 'chosen' by an 'immense intelligence' which used his body to convey this message to mankind,{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=248-249}}{{efn-la|name="I_am_free"}}{{efn-la|name="locking_of_horns"}} but realised at his deathbed that nobody had experienced this 'intelligence' the way he had.{{efn|name="nobody"}}


Interest in Krishnamurti and his work has persisted in the years since his death. Many books, audio, video, and computer materials, remain in print and are carried by major online and traditional retailers. The four official Foundations continue to maintain archives, disseminate the teachings in an increasing number of languages, convert print to digital and other media, develop websites, sponsor television programs, and organise meetings and dialogues of interested persons around the world.<ref>See also [http://www.ereleases.com/pr/20040701001.html ''The Complete Teachings Project''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090202071949/http://ereleases.com/pr/20040701001.html |date=2 February 2009}}, an ambitious effort to collect the entire body of Krishnamurti's work into a coherently edited master reference.</ref>
===Self-perception: vast emptiness and saviour-role===
Peter Michel notes that "Mystical experiences determined Krishnamurti's entire life, and cannot be separated from his teachings."<ref name=Algeo/> According to Krishnamurti,
: an "immense energy and intelligence went through this body," a consciousness which he called "the otherness."{{efn|name="nobody"}}
It manifested in the absence of thought, and to Mary Lutyens, his biographer, he said
: "If I was writing the life, I would start with the vacant mind,"{{sfnp|Lutyens|1988|p=3}}{{efn|
Krishnamurti:
:
“No thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was [[Aphantasia|no image-making]]. He often attempted to think but no thought would come.”
}}
while at his deathbed he referred to "that vast emptiness."{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003}} Krishnamurti saw himself as free and unconditioned,{{efn|name="no_ego"|
Krishnamurti:
:
"I have no ego!"{{sfnp|Sloss|1991}}
}}
imploring his audiences to understand his state of being and aiming for such like-minded spirits to transform the world;{{efn-la|name="I_am_free"|
Krishnamurti:
:
"Because I am free, unconditioned, whole, not the part, not the relative, but the whole Truth that is eternal, I desire those, who seek to understand me, to be free [...] those who really desire to understand, who are looking to find that which is eternal, without a beginning and without an end, will walk together with greater intensity, will be a danger to everything that is unessential, to unrealities, to shadows. And they will concentrate, they will become the flame, because they understand. Such a body we must create, and that is my purpose. Because of that true friendship – which you do not seem to know – there will be real co-operation on the part of each one. And this not because of authority, not because of salvation, but because you really understand, and hence are capable of living in the eternal. This is a greater thing than all pleasure, than all sacrifice."<ref>
{{cite web |title=Truth is a pathless land |website=thekrishnamurti.blogspot.com |url=https://thekrishnamurti.blogspot.com/p/this-speech-is-from-www.html?m=1
}}
</ref>
}}{{efn-la|name="locking_of_horns"}} and he often referred to the totality of his work as ''the'' teachings, and not as ''my'' teachings.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1990|p=210}} He once compared himself to [[Thomas Edison]], suggesting that he had blazed a trail for others to follow. Those who came after wouldn't need his special gifts: They would only need to turn the switch.{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983b|p=119}}{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=251}}
 
===Self-observation===
According to the Krishnamurti Foundations, the core of Krishnamurti's teachings is contained in his 1929 statement, in which he rejected the Theosophical Society and their elaborate system of spiritual progress guided by 'Masters'.<ref name=Core>
{{cite web
|first=J. |last=Krishnamurti
|year=1980
|title=The core of the teachings
|website=jkrishnamurti.org
|url=https://www.jkrishnamurti.org/about-core-teachings
}}
</ref> In this speech, Krishnamurti asserted that "truth is a pathless land" and advised against following any [[doctrine]], discipline, teacher, [[guru]], or authority, including himself.<ref>
{{cite journal
|last=Rodrigues |first=Hillary
|date=January 1996
|title=J. Krishnamurti's 'religious mind'
|journal=[[Religious Studies and Theology]]
|volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=40–55
}}
</ref>
 
Shai Tubali notes that Krishnamurti's teachings were essentially dialogical in nature, aiming at 'transformative dialogue'.<ref>
{{cite book
|first = Shai |last = Tubali
|date = 26 September 2023
|chapter = ‘We are inquiring together’: The dialogical nature of Jiddu Krishnamurti’s work
|title =  The Transformative Philosophical Dialogue
|series = Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures |volume = 41
|pages = 99–122
|publisher = Springer, Cham
|isbn = 978-3-031-40073-5
|doi = 10.1007/978-3-031-40074-2_6
|chapter-url = https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-40074-2_6
|access-date = 2025-08-18 }} Online ed. {{isbn|978-3-031-40074-2}}
</ref>
Yet, as summarized by John Algeo, Peter Michel observes that "real dialogue is conspicuously lacking; such apparent invitations [to look into this together] were rhetorical introductions to a monologue."<ref name=Algeo>
{{cite magazine
|first = John |last = Algeo
|date = Autumn 1995
|title = ''Krishnamurti – love and freedom: Approaching a mystery'' by Peter Michel (1995) 205&nbsp;pages
|magazine = [[Quest (Theosophical magazine)|Quest Magazine]]
|type = book review
|url=https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/krishnamurti-love-and-freedom-approaching-a-mystery
|via = theosophical.org
}}
</ref> According to Krishnamurti, a radical transformation was necessary,{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=26}} a transformation which could be achieved by anyone, without the aid of a teacher or guru.{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=29}}
: One has to live "psychologically alone [...] without depending on anything or anyone,"{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=26}} living in complete attention to observe and let go of the contents of consciousness.{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=26-27}}
 
Asked to summarize the teaching in one sentence, Krishnamurti answered "Attempt without effort to live with death in futureless silence, elaborating that
: "death is the end of all you are afraid to lose: Your attachments, your memory, your disappeared friends, your prestige [...] All that is the content of your consciousness. Can you get rid of it right now?"{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=30}}
 
Krishnamurti also summarized his the teachings as stating that truth cannot be reached through organised religion or techniques, but through relationship, self-understanding and self-observation.<ref name="Core"/> The mental representations ("images") man has built shield him from fear, but also disturb his perception. Freedom is freedom from these conceptions, and is contained in pure observation, in "choiceless awareness of our daily existence and activity."<ref name=Core/> He dismissed the need for contrived [[meditation]] techniques, instead emphasizing the practice of [[choiceless awareness]] as the essence of "true meditation".{{efn|
The foundation for true meditation is that passive awareness which is the total freedom from authority and ambition, envy and fear. Meditation has no meaning, no significance whatsoever without this freedom [...] Thought is of knowledge and knowledge cannot free the mind of the fact. Meditation is the choiceless awareness of this complex, which empties the mind of the known.{{sfnp|Krishnamurti|1976}}
}}
 
In his meetings with Nehru in 1947, Krishnamurti elaborated at length on the teachings, saying in one instance,
: "Understanding of the self only arises in relationship, in watching yourself in relationship to people, ideas, and things; to trees, the earth, and the world around you and within you. Relationship is the mirror in which the self is revealed. Without self-knowledge there is no basis for right thought and action."
Nehru asked, "How does one start?" to which Krishnamurti replied,
: "Begin where you are. Read every word, every phrase, every paragraph of the mind, as it operates through thought."{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=142}}
 
In ''Beyond Violence'', Krishnamurti stated "Observe the self in operation, learn about it, watch it, be aware of it. Do not try to destroy it, get rid of it or change it – just watch it, without any choice or distortion. Out of that watching and learning, the self disappears."
 
===Influence – 'nobody understood'===
While his personal charisma affected many,<ref name=Algeo/> both Krishnamurti himself and many commentators have noted that his teachings do not seem to have changed any person.{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=5}}{{sfnp|Weeraperuma|1998a}}<ref name=Algeo/> At his deathbed he stated that
: "[p]erhaps they will somewhat [get into touch with that energy] if they live the teachings. But nobody has done it. Nobody. And so that's that."{{efn|name="nobody"}}
He also stated
: "if you all knew what you have missed – that vast emptiness."{{sfnp|Lutyens|2003}}
 
Krishnamurti tried to convey his experience of "the otherness" to others, but without a 'method', as this would be another "thought-control method."{{sfnp|Vas|2004|p=15}} In 1935, Rom Landau asked him "How do you expect to help others?" adding "you forget that we all, millions and millions of us, live in the vast plains at the foot of the mountain."{{sfnp|Landau|1939|p=286-287}} To this, Krishnamurti answered:
{{blockquote|How can you expect me to be concerned with what should be done or how it should be done? If you have once lived on a mountain top, you cannot return to the plains. You can only try to make other people feel the purity of the air and enjoy the infinite prospect, and become one with the beauty of life there.{{sfnp|Landau|1939|p=287}}{{efn|name="Sloss_1991_union_comment"}}}}
 
Emily Lutyens once wrote to him:
: "You seem surprised that people do not understand you but I should be far more surprised if they did! After all, you are upsetting everything in which they have ever believed – knocking out their foundations and putting in its place a nebulous abstraction."{{sfnp|Lutyens|1990|p=127-128}}
 
Mary Lutyens noted a quite utilitarian motive in Krishnamurti's audiences, stating that
: "the possibility he holds out of an almost instantaneous psychological transformation in each one of us which will end sorrow and solve all our problems is so irresistible"
that people kept coming to his talks,{{sfnp|Lutyens|1983}} a motive quite different from Krishnamurti's aim of radical righteousness.
 
Nevertheless, interest in Krishnamurti and his work has persisted in the years since his death. Many books, audio, video, and computer materials, remain in print and are carried by major online and traditional retailers. The four official Foundations continue to maintain archives, disseminate the teachings in an increasing number of languages, convert print to digital and other media, develop websites, sponsor television programs, and organise meetings and dialogues of interested persons around the world.<ref>See also {{cite web |title=The Complete Teachings Project  |url=http://www.ereleases.com/pr/20040701001.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090202071949/http://ereleases.com/pr/20040701001.html |archive-date=2 February 2009}}—an ambitious effort to collect the entire body of Krishnamurti's work into a coherently edited master reference.</ref>
 
==Notable admirers and meetings==
[[File:KFI retreat at Rishi Valley.jpg|thumb|alt=KFI retreat at Rishi Valley |KFI retreat session at Rishi Valley on 17 November 2019, Padmanabhan Krishna addressing the gathering, with [[Radhika Herzberger]] presiding]]
 
Notable individuals influenced by Krishnamurti include [[George Bernard Shaw]], [[David Bohm]], [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], the [[14th Dalai Lama|Dalai Lama]], [[Aldous Huxley]], [[Alan Watts]],<ref>{{cite AV media |title=Alan Watts talking about Jiddu Krishnamurti: He was an extraordinary mystic |website=[[YouTube]] |medium=video |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vjshtqhddg }}</ref> [[Henry Miller]], [[Bruce Lee]],<ref>{{cite journal |last=Colet |first=Robert |date=August 1986 |title=Krishnamurti: The spiritual force behind Bruce Lee |journal=Inside Kung Fu |volume=13 |issue=8 |pages=73–75 |url=https://www.jkrishnamurti.org/sites/default/files/Robert-Colet-Bruce-Lee.pdf |via=jkrishnamurti.org }}</ref> [[Terence Stamp]],<ref>{{cite AV media |title = Terence Stamp speaking at the Krishnamurti Centre |date=27 August 2018 |medium=video |website = [[YouTube]] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdB-OMnjaMc&list=PLnUHGKHE-_MFi1IC_7XMPUudeIz0GRIez&index=21 }}</ref> [[Jackson Pollock]],<ref>{{cite web |title= Jackson Pollock (by L. Proyect) |website=columbia.edu |url=http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/culture/pollock.htm, |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200928210718/http://www.columbia.edu/%7Elnp3/mydocs/culture/pollock.htm |archive-date=28 September 2020 }}</ref> [[Toni Packer]],<ref>{{cite web |title=Remembering meditation teacher Toni Packer (1927–2013) |date=24 August 2013 |website=Lion's Roar (lionsroar.com) |url=https://www.lionsroar.com/remembering-meditation-teacher-toni-packer-1927-2013-2/ }}</ref> [[Achyut Patwardhan]],<ref name=independent>{{cite news |title=Achyut Patwardhan |date=23 October 2011 |type=obituary |newspaper=[[The Independent]] |place=London, UK |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-achyut-patwardhan-1541827.html |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=28 November 2017 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220608/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-achyut-patwardhan-1541827.html |archive-date=8 June 2022 }}</ref> [[Dada Dharmadhikari]],<ref name="mkgandhi-sarvodaya">{{cite web |title=Dada Dharmadhikari biography |website=mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org |url=http://www.mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org/dharma/dharmabio.htm |access-date=28 November 2017|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111109114350/http://mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org/dharma/dharmabio.htm|archive-date=9 November 2011 }}</ref> [[Derek Trucks]],<ref>{{cite news |last=Horowitz |first=Scott |date=3 July 2018 |title=Derek Trucks talks new album, 2017 losses, & the new generation |department=Interview |website=L4LM (liveforlivemusic.com) |url=https://liveforlivemusic.com/news/interview-derek-trucks-2018-interview/ |access-date=8 June 2023 |lang=en-US }}</ref> [[U. G. Krishnamurti|U.G. Krishnamurti]] and [[Eckhart Tolle]].<ref>{{cite AV media |title=Through the eyes of Krishnamurti |medium=video |website=[[YouTube]] |date=13 February 2014 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Y2yOZGgHuY }}</ref>
 
[[George Bernard Shaw]] in his later years was acquainted with Krishnamurti and declared Krishnamurti to be the "most beautiful human being" he had ever met.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Moody |first=David Edmund |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-lBbBgAAQBAJ&q=jiddu+krishnamurti+schools |title=The Unconditioned Mind: J. Krishnamurti and the Oak Grove School |date=2013-01-07 |publisher=Quest Books |isbn=978-0-8356-3034-4 |language=en}}</ref> In 1938 he met [[Aldous Huxley]].{{sfnp|Vernon|2001|p=205}} The two began a close friendship which endured for many years.<ref name="kfion"/>
 
When Krishnamurti was in India in 1947 many prominent personalities came to meet him, including Prime Minister [[Jawaharlal Nehru]].{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=142}} In the 1970s, Krishnamurti met several times with then Indian prime minister [[Indira Gandhi]], with whom he had far-ranging, and in some cases, very serious conversations. Jayakar considers his message in meetings with Indira Gandhi as a possible influence in the lifting of certain emergency measures Gandhi had imposed during periods of political turmoil.{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=340–343}}
 
Krishnamurti was very highly regarded by several leading religious figures in India. [[Nisargadatta Maharaj]] described Krishnamurti as 'complete [[Brahman]]'.<ref>"I am Unborn (Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj)", page 100, Chapter 45.</ref> [[Anandamayi Ma]] addressed him as the 'Guru of gurus'.{{sfnp|Jayakar|1986|p=144}} When [[Ramana Maharshi]] was asked why Krishnamurti dissolved the Order of the Star in the East, he replied "The Order's purpose stood consummated in that the World Teacher had arrived; that is why it was dissolved."<ref>Blutkeim, Aham Sphurana: Scintillations of Jnana from Sri Ramana Maharishi, page 408.</ref> He engaged in discussions with several well known Hindu and Buddhist scholars and leaders, including the [[Dalai Lama]].{{efn|
The Dalai Lama characterised Krishnamurti as a ''"great soul"'' {{harv|Jayakar|1986|p=203}}. Krishnamurti very much enjoyed the Lama's company and by his own admission could not bring up his anti-guru views, mindful of the Lama's feelings.
}}
Several of these discussions were later published as chapters in various Krishnamurti books.
 
In his later years, he met with many prominent religious leaders and scholars including [[Swami Venkatesananda]], [[Anandamayi Ma]], [[Lakshman Joo]], [[Walpola Rahula]], and Eugene Schalert. In India he also met with many sanyasis and monks throughout his life.
 
Although Krishnamurti's philosophy delved into fields as diverse as religious studies, education, psychology, physics, and consciousness studies, he was not then, nor since, well known in academic circles. Nevertheless, Krishnamurti met and held discussions with physicists [[Fritjof Capra]] and [[E. C. George Sudarshan]], biologist [[Rupert Sheldrake]], psychiatrist David Shainberg, as well as psychotherapists representing various theoretical orientations.<ref>See ''On Krishnamurti'', by Raymond Martin, Wadsworth, 2003, for a discussion on Krishnamurti and the academic world.</ref>
 
In 1974 Krishnamurti was interviewed on [[PBS]] television in a series of 19 dialogues with Alan W. Anderson. The dialogues resulted in two books being published.<ref name="WDWL">{{cite book |last1=Krishnamurti |first1=J. |last2=Anderson |first2=Alan W. |title=A Wholly Different Way of Living |date=1991 |publisher=Krishnamurti Foundation Trust Ltd |location=Hampshire, England |isbn=978-81-87326-14-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Sa49OoLiyPMC |access-date=14 April 2025}}</ref><ref name="OKT">{{cite book |last1=Anderson |first1=Alan W. |title=On Krishnamurti's Teachings |date=2012 |publisher=Karina Library Press |location=Ojai, California |isbn=978-1-937902-00-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=F6F2MAEACAAJ |access-date=14 April 2025}}</ref>


== In popular culture ==
== In popular culture ==
A sample of Krishnamurti's 1980 talk "Why Does The Mind Constantly Seek Pleasure" appears in the [[Tube & Berger]] song Imprint of Pleasure.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Tube & Berger's 'Imprint of Pleasure' Discover the Sample Source |url=https://www.whosampled.com/sample/427748/Tube-%26-Berger-Imprint-of-Pleasure-Fifth-Public-Talk,-61580-Why-Does-the-Mind-Constantly-Seek-Pleasure/ |access-date=2022-10-13 |website=WhoSampled |language=en}}</ref>
A sample of Krishnamurti's 1980 talk "Why does the mind constantly seek pleasure?" appears in the [[Tube & Berger]] song "Imprint of Pleasure".<ref>{{cite web |title=Tube & Berger's "Imprint of Pleasure" discover the sample source |website=Who Sampled? (whosampled.com) |id=sample&nbsp;427748 |url=https://www.whosampled.com/sample/427748/Tube-%26-Berger-Imprint-of-Pleasure-Fifth-Public-Talk,-61580-Why-Does-the-Mind-Constantly-Seek-Pleasure/ |access-date=13 October 2022 |lang=en}}</ref>
 
Krishnamurti is one of the people who Indiana Jones meets in ''[[The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles]]''. Krishnamurti is shown as a young boy around 10–12 years old, this is around the time that he was first associated with the Theosophical Society.  He meets and becomes friends with Indy in Season 2 episode 15 titled "Benares, January 1910" (later re-edited into the episode "Journey of Radiance"). Indy, his parents and his tutor Miss Seymour attend a meeting of the society.
 
Krishnamurti appears as an important character in [[James Harpur]]'s 2021 novel, ''The Pathless Country''.<ref name="The Pathless Country at cinnamonpress.com">{{cite web |title=The Pathless Country |website=cinnamonpress.com |url=https://cinnamonpress.com/the-pathless-country/ |access-date=2024-01-10}}</ref>
 
==Notes==
{{notelist|refs=
<!-- J -->
<!-- "jk-assoc" -->
<!-- L -->
<!-- "locking_of_horns" -->
{{efn-la|name="locking_of_horns"|
U. G. Krishnamurti described one of their meetings as follows: "We really didn't get along well.  Whenever we met we locked horns over some issue or other. For instance, I never shared his concern for the world, or his belief that his teaching would profoundly affect the thoughts and actions of mankind for the next five hundred years – a fantasy of the Theosophist [[occultists]]. In one of our meetings I told Krishnamurti, "I am not called upon to save the world." He asked, "The house is on fire – what will you do?" "Pour more gasoline on it and maybe something will rise from the ashes", I remarked. Krishnamurti said, "You are absolutely impossible". Then I said, "You are still a [[Theosophist]]. You have never freed yourself from the [[World Teacher]] role. There is a story in the [[Avadhuta Gita]] which talks of the [[Avadhuta|avadhut]] who stopped at a wayside inn and was asked by the innkeeper, 'What is your teaching?' He replied, 'There is no teacher, no teaching and no one taught.' And then he walked away. You too repeat these phrases and yet you are so concerned with preserving your teaching for posterity in its pristine purity."{{sfnp|Bhatt|1992}}<!-- <ref>[https://people.well.com/user/jct/ugbio/ugbio4.htm U.G. Krishnamurti: A life. 4. Locking of Horns]</ref> -->
}}
<!-- N -->
<!-- "nobody" -->
{{efn|name="nobody"|
:''Quoting Krishnamurti from tape-recording made on {{nobr|7 February 1986:}}''
In the morning of {{nobr|7 May 1986,}} K. answered a question from Mary Cadogan.{{harvp|Lutyens|1990|p=159-160}}, {{harvp|Lutyens|2003|p=205-206}}:
"When Krishnaji dies what ''really'' happen with this extraordinary focus of understanding and energy that is K?"
:
K: "'It is gone. If someone goes wholly into the teachings perhaps they might touch that; but one cannot ''try'' to touch it.' Then, after a moment, he added: 'If you all knew what you have missed – that vast emptiness.'"
:
[...] ''Later that morning, a further response was recorded:''
:
"I was telling them this morning – for seventy years that super-energy – no – that immense energy, immense intelligence, has been using this body. I don’t think people realise what tremendous energy and intelligence went through this body – there’s twelve-cylinder engine. And for seventy years – was a pretty long time – and now the body can’t stand any more. Nobody, unless the body has been prepared, very carefully, protected and so on – nobody can understand what went through this body. Nobody. Don’t anybody pretend. Nobody. I repeat this: Nobody amongst us or the public, know what went on. I know they don’t.
:
And now after seventy years it has come to an end. Not that that intelligence and energy – it’s somewhat here, every day, and especially at night. And after seventy years the body can’t stand it – can’t stand any more. It can’t. The Indians have a lot of damned superstitions about this – that you will and the body goes – and all that kind of nonsense. You won’t find another body like this, or that supreme intelligence operating in a body for many hundred years. You won’t see it again. When he goes, it goes. There is no consciousness left behind of that consciousness, of that state. They’ll all pretend or try to imagine they can get into touch with that. Perhaps they will somewhat if they live the teachings. But nobody has done it. Nobody. And so that’s that."
}}
<!-- P -->
<!-- "process" -->
{{efn-la|name="process"|
Krishnamurti allowed information about ''the process'' and other details of his life to become public knowledge through Lutyens' biography, which included extensive descriptions of the first such occurrences {{harv|Lutyens|1975|loc={{nobr|chs. "18:}} The Turning Point", "21: Climax of the Process" {{pp.|152|188}} {{interp|cumulative}}
}}.
}}
<!-- "proces_explanation" -->
{{efn-la|name="proces_explanation"|
A range of explanations have been given {{harvp|Vernon|2001|p=124-128}}. {{harvp|Jayakar|1986|p=46n}} and {{harvp|Lutyens|1975|p=166}} provide a frequently given explanation, that it represented the so-called ''awakening of [[kundalini]]'' – a process that according to Hindu mysticism culminates in [[Transcendence (religion)|transcendent consciousness]]. Others view it in [[Sigmund Freud|Freudian]] terms. {{harvp|Aberbach|1993}} contends that the experiences were a projection of Krishnamurti's accumulated grief over the death of his mother. {{harvp|Sloss|1993|pp=58–61}} attributes the onset to Krishnamurti's meditation practice, but also considers the ''process'' to be a purely physical event caused by malaria, [[dissociation (psychology)|dissociation]] accompanied by [[hallucination]]s, or the need to receive motherly care, noting that
: "[i]n the future these symptoms would be witnessed usually by a woman for whom Krashna felt a special involvement or love."
She also suggests the possibility of [[temporal lobe epilepsy#Effects on society|epilepsy]]. ''See also'' [[Ecstatic seizures]], and {{cite web |title=Akasha, saga, temporal lobe epilepsy, and aphantasia |date=14 May 2024 |url=https://www.neuromythography.org/akasha-saga-and-aphantasia/ |via=neuromythography.org }}.
:
{{harvp|Lutyens|1990}} rejects this possibility: According to {{harvp|Lutyens|1990|pp=45–46}}, Krishnamurti believed the ''process'' was necessary for his spiritual development and not a medical matter or condition. As far as he was concerned, he had encountered Truth; he thought the ''process'' was in some way related to this encounter, and to later experiences.
}}
<!-- "Sloss_1991_union_comment" -->
{{efn|name="Sloss_1991_union_comment"|
{{harvp|Sloss|1993|p=62}} comments:
:
:"Krishna's experience [...] can bestow no authority to ''lead'', only to ''share'', and by sharing to offer others the hope of the sense of reality imparted."
:
Krishnamurti himself said, in response to Rom Landau:
: "You are right. They live in the plains and I live, as you call it, on the mountaintop; but I hope that ever more and more human beings will be able to endure the clear air of the mountain top [...] How can you expect me to be concerned with what should be done or how it should be done? If you have once lived on a mountaintop, you cannot return to the plains. You can only try to make other people feel the purity of the air and enjoy the infinite prospect, and become one with the beauty of life there." {{harvp|Landau|1939|p=287}}
}}
}}


==Works==
==Works==
{{main article|Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography}}
{{main|Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography}}
{{see also|List of works about Jiddu Krishnamurti}}
{{see also|List of works about Jiddu Krishnamurti}}
* ''[[At the Feet of the Master]]'' (1910)
 
* ''The Kingdom of Happiness'' (1928)
==See also==
* ''The Pool of Wisdom'' (1928)
* [[Mazu polishing a tile]]
* ''[[The First and Last Freedom]]'' (1954)
* ''[[Commentaries on Living]]'' (1956–1960)
* ''[[Freedom from the Known]]'' (1969)
* ''[[Krishnamurti's Notebook]]'' (1976)
* ''[[Krishnamurti's Journal]]'' (1982)
* ''[[Krishnamurti to Himself]]'' (1987)


==References==
==References==
'''Notes'''
{{reflist|colwidth=25em}}
{{notelist}}
 
'''Citations'''
==Sources==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
{{refbegin|25em|small=y}}
<!-- A -->
* {{cite journal
| last=Aberbach | first=David
| year = 1993
| title = Mystical union and grief: The Ba'al Shem Tov and Krishnamurti
| journal = [[Harvard Theological Review]]
| volume = 86 | issue = 3 | pages = 309–321
| issn = 0017-8160 | jstor = 1510013
| doi = 10.1017/s0017816000031254
| s2cid = 162399497
}}{{subscription required}}
<!-- B -->
* {{cite book
| last = Bhatt
| first = Mahesh
| year = 1992
| title = U.G. Krishnamurti: A life
| publisher = Viking
| url = https://ug-k.blogspot.com/2007/04/locking-of-horns-inspiration-is.html?m=1
| via = ug-k.blogspot.com
}}
<!-- F -->
* {{cite magazine
| last = Fausset | first = Hugh l'Anson
| date = 14 May 1954
| title = ''Bond and Free''
| type = book review
| magazine = [[The Times Literary Supplement]]
| location = London, UK
<!-- | publisher = TLS Education -->
| page = 317
| issn = 0040-7895
| id = {{gale|EX1200099611}}
}}
<!-- J -->
* {{cite book
| last = Jayakar | first = Pupul | author-link = Pupul Jayakar
| year = 1986
| title = Krishnamurti: A biography
| edition = 1st
| location = San Francisco, CA
| publisher = [[HarperCollins|Harper & Row]]
| isbn =978-0-06-250401-2
}}
* {{Cite book
| last =Jayakar | first =Pupu
| year = 2000
| title = J. Krishnamurti: A biography | lang = en
| place = London, UK
| publisher = Penguin UK
| isbn = 978-93-5118-284-9
}}
<!-- K -->
* {{cite periodical
| last = Krishnamurti | first = Jiddu
| year = 1926
| title = Editorial notes
| periodical = [[Order of the Star in the East|The Herald of the Star]]
| volume = XV |issue = 1 | page = 3
| location = London, UK
| publisher = Theosophical Publishing House
| oclc = 225662044
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Krishnamurti
| first = Jiddu
| year = 1928a
| section = Who brings the truth?
| title = The Pool of Wisdom: Who brings the truth, by what authority, and three poems
| location = [[Eerde, Ommen]]
| publisher = Star Publishing Trust
| pages = 43–53
| oclc = 4894479
| section-url = http://jiddu-krishnamurti.net/en/1927-the-pool-of-wisdom/jiddu-krishnamurti-the-pool-of-wisdom-07
| via = jiddu-krishnamurti.net [web publisher] ([[Saaremaa]], [[Estonia]])
| url-status = usurped
| access-date = 7 October 2010
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101219083736/http://jiddu-krishnamurti.net/en/1927-the-pool-of-wisdom/jiddu-krishnamurti-the-pool-of-wisdom-07
| archive-date = 19 December 2010
}}
*{{cite periodical
| last = Krishnamurti
| first = Jiddu
| year = 1929
| title = The dissolution of the Order of the Star: A statement by J. Krishnamurti
| periodical = [[International Star Bulletin]]
| volume = 3
| issue = 2
| pages = 28–34
| series = {{interp|issues renumbered starting August 1929}}
| location = [[Eerde, Ommen]]
| publisher = Star Publishing Trust
| oclc = 34693176
| url = http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/about-krishnamurti/dissolution-speech.php
| via = J.Krishnamurti Online (jkrishnamurti.org) [web publisher]
| access-date = 9 March 2010
| archive-date = 15 August 2015
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150815003110/http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/about-krishnamurti/dissolution-speech.php
| url-status = dead
}}
* {{cite speech
| last = Krishnamurti
| first = Jiddu
| year = 1960
| title = Public talk&nbsp;4, Madras, 23&nbsp;December 1956
| event = Talks by Krishnamurti in India 1956–1957
| medium = official transcript
| location = [[Ojai, California]]
| publisher = Krishnamurti Writings
| oclc = 33232421
| url = https://www.jkrishnamurti.org/content/madras-4th-public-talk-23rd-december-1956
| via = [[#JKO|J. Krishnamurti Online]]
| access-date = 2023-01-25
}}
* {{cite speech
| last = Krishnamurti
| first = Jiddu
| year = 1963
| title = Public Talk&nbsp;5, London, England, 14&nbsp;June 1962
| event = Talks by Krishnamurti in Europe 1962
| medium = official transcript
| location = [[Ojai, California]]
| publisher = Krishnamurti Writings
| oclc = 24765752
| url = https://www.jkrishnamurti.org/content/public-talk-5-london-england-14-june-1962
| via = [[#JKO|J. Krishnamurti Online]]
| access-date = 2023-01-17
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Krishnamurti
| first = Jiddu
| year = 1972
| section = Eerde gathering, 1927: Questions and answers
| title = Early Writings of J. Krishnamurti
| volume = II [Offprints from Chetana 1970]
| pages = 6–14
| oclc = 312923125
| location = [[Mumbai|Bombay]], IN
| publisher = Chetana
| section-url = http://jiddu-krishnamurti.net/en/1927-1928-1929-early-writings/krishnamurti-early-writings-03-eerde-gathering-1927
| via = jiddu-krishnamurti.net [web publisher] ([[Saaremaa]], [[Estonia]])
| access-date = 21 December 2010
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Krishnamurti | first = Jiddu
| year = 2004 | orig-year = 1982
| title = Krishnamurti's Journal | title-link = Krishnamurti's Journal
| location = [[Bramdean]], UK
| publisher = Krishnamurti Foundation Trust
| isbn = 978-0-900506-23-9
}}—Originally published (1982) San Francisco, CA: [[HarperCollins|Harper & Row]]
<!-- L -->
* {{cite book
| last = Landau
| first = Rom
| year = 1939
| title = God is my Adventyre: A book on modern mystics, masters, and teachers
| publisher = Gaber and Faber
| location = London, UK
| url = https://archive.org/details/godismyadventure032951mbp/page/n6/mode/1up?q=dramatic+account
| via = [[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens | first = Mary | author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 1975
| title = Krishnamurti: The years of awakening
| edition = 1st U.S.
| location = New York, NY
| publisher = [[Farrar, Straus and Giroux]]
| isbn = 978-0-374-18222-9
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens
| first = Mary
| author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 1983
| title = Krishnamurti: The years of awakening
| edition = 1st Avon Discus
| location = New York, NY
| publisher = Avon Discus Printing
| isbn = 0-380-00734-7
| url = https://archive.org/details/krishnamurtiyear00luty
| via = [[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens
| first = Mary
| author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 1983b
| title = Krishnamurti: The years of fulfilment
| edition = 1st U.S. [[hardback|hdbk]]
| location = New York, NY
| publisher = [[Farrar, Straus and Giroux]]
| isbn = 978-0-374-18224-3
| url = https://archive.org/details/krishnamurti00mary
| via = [[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens
| first = Mary
| author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 1988
| title = The Open Door
| publisher = [[Farrar, Straus and Giroux]]
| edition = 1st U.S.
| lang = en
| isbn = 978-0-7195-4534-4
| url = https://archive.org/details/krishnamurtiopen00luty/mode/1up
| via = [[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens | first = Mary | author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 1990
| title = The life and death of Krishnamurti
| edition = 1st U.K.
| location = London, UK
| publisher = [[John Murray (publishing house)|John Murray]]
| isbn = 978-0-7195-4749-2
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens | first = Mary | author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 1995
| title = The Boy Krishna: The first fourteen years in the life of J. Krishnamurti
| type = [[pamphlet]]
| location = [[Bramdean]], UK
| publisher = Krishnamurti Foundation Trust
| isbn = 978-0-900506-13-0
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens
| first = Mary
| author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 1997
| title = Krishnamurti: The years of awakening
| publisher = Shambhala
| isbn = 978-1-57062-288-5
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=lhPFWXgxQCkC
| via = Google
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens | first = Mary | author-link = Mary Lutyens
| year = 2003
| title = The life and death of Krishnamurti
| type = [[pamphlet]]
| location = [[Bramdean]], UK
| publisher = Krishnamurti Foundation Trust
| isbn = 0-900506-22-9
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Lutyens
| first = Mary
| author-link = Mary Lutyens
| date = 2003a
| title = The Open Door
| lang = en
| location = [[Bramdean]], UK
| publisher = Krishnamurti Foundation Trust
| isbn = 978-0-900506-21-5
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=iG2hHtxiXyoC&q=brahmin
| via = Google
}}
<!-- P -->
* {{cite book
| last = Padmanabhan | first = Krishna
| year = 2015
| title = A Jewel on a Silver Platter: Remembering Jiddu Krishnamurti
|location = [[Varanasi]]
| publisher = Pilgrims Publishing
| isbn = 978-93-5076-056-7
}}
<!-- S -->
* {{cite book
| last = Sloss | first = Radha Rajagopal
| year = 1991a
| title = Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti | title-link = Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti
| edition = 1st
| location = London, UK
| publisher = [[Bloomsbury Publishing]]
| isbn = 978-0-7475-0720-8
}}
* {{cite book
| last=Sloss | first = Radha Rajagopal
| year = 1993 | orig-year = 1991
| title =Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti | title-link =Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti
| edition = reprint 1st
| location = London, UK
| publisher = [[Bloomsbury Publishing]]
| isbn = 978-0-2016-3211-8}}
* {{cite book
| last = Sloss | first = Radha Rajagopal
| year = 2011 | orig-year = 1991
| title = Lives in the shadow with J. Krishnamurti |title-link =Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti
| edition = [[e-book]]
| location = Lincoln, NB
| publisher = [[iUniverse]]
| isbn = 978-14-6203131-3
}}
<!-- T -->
* {{cite news
  <!--Staff writer(s); no byline.-->
| title = Jiddu Krishnamurti, philosophical and religious teacher
| date = 19 February 1986
| type = obituary
| page = 14
| newspaper = [[The Times]]
| location = London, UK
| issn = 0140-0460
| id = {{gale|A117898889}}
| ref = {{harvid|The Times|1986}}
}}
<!-- V -->
* {{cite book
| last = Vas | first = Luis S.R.
| year = 2004
| title = J. Krishnamurti: Great liberator or failed messiah?
| publisher = Motilall Banarsidass
}}
* {{cite book
| last = Vernon
| first = Roland
| author-link = Roland Vernon
| year = 2001
| title = Star in the East: Krishnamurti: The invention of a messiah
| location = New York, NY
| publisher = [[Palgrave Macmillan|Palgrave]]
| isbn = 978-0-312-23825-4
| url = https://archive.org/details/starineastkrishn00vern
| via = [[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}
<!-- W -->
* {{cite book
| last = Weeraperuma
| first = Susunaga
| year = 1974
| title = A Bibliography of the Life and Teachings of Jiddu Krishnamurti
| edition = 1st hardcover
| location = [[Leiden]]
| publisher = [[Brill Publishers | E. J. Brill]]
| isbn = 978-90-04-04007-6
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=GeIUAAAAIAAJ
| via = Google
| url-access = limited
| access-date = 2019-04-25
| df = dmy-all
}}
* {{cite book
|last        = Weeraperuma
|first      = Susunaga
|year        = 1998
|title      = Jiddu Krishnamurti: A bibliographical guide
|orig-year  = 1982
|edition    = [[hardcover|hdcv]] reprint 2nd rev.
|location    = Delhi, IN
|publisher  = [[Motilal Banarsidass]]
|isbn        = 978-81-208-1426-4
|url        = https://books.google.com/books?id=58o6zKOkOfQC
|url-access  = limited
|via        = Google
|access-date = 2019-04-25
}}—originally published 1982 as ''Supplement to a bibliography of the life and teachings of Jiddu Krishnamurti''. [[Mumbai|Bombay]]
* {{cite book
| last = Weeraperuma
| first = Susunaga
| year = 1998a
| orig-year = 1988
| title = Krishnamurti as I Knew Him
| location = Delhi, IN
| publisher = Motilall Banarsidass
| url = https://archive.org/details/jkrishnamurtiasi0000weer/page/n6/mode/1up
| via = [[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}
* {{cite book
|last        = Williams
|first      = Christine V.
|year        = 2004
|title      = Jiddu Krishnamurti: World philosopher (1895–1986): His life and thoughts
|edition    = 1st [[hardcover|hdcv]]
|location    = Delhi, IN
|publisher  = [[Motilal Banarsidass]]
|isbn        = 978-81-208-2032-6
|url        = https://books.google.com/books?id=NzDar6XfICEC
|url-access  = limited
|via        = Google
|access-date = 2019-04-25
|df          = dmy-all
}}
<!-- Z -->
* {{cite web
|last=Zimbalist
|first=Mary
|year=2014
|title=In the presence of Krishnamurti: The memoirs of Mary Zimbalist
|editor-last=Forbes
|editor-first=Scott H.
|website=In the presence of Krishnamurti (inthepresenceofk.org)
|place=[[Portland, Oregon]]
|publisher=Holistic Education
|url=http://inthepresenceofk.org
|access-date=2024-08-06
}}—Originally published in series, March 2013 – December 2014<!--range from source pages.-->
{{refend}}


==Bibliography==
==Further reading==
* {{cite journal|last=Aberbach|first=David|date=1 July 1993|title=Mystical Union and Grief: the Ba'al Shem Tov and Krishnamurti|journal=[[Harvard Theological Review]]|volume=86|issue=3|pages=309–321|location=[[Cambridge, Massachusetts]]|issn=0017-8160|jstor=1510013 |doi=10.1017/s0017816000031254|s2cid=162399497 }}<!-- |access-date=28 September 2010 -->{{subscription required}}
;Serial biographies by Mary Lutyens
*{{cite book|last=Jayakar|author-link=Pupul Jayakar|first=Pupul|year=1986|title=Krishnamurti: a biography|location=San Francisco|edition=1st|publisher=[[HarperCollins|Harper & Row]]|isbn=978-0-06-250401-2}}
* {{cite book
*{{cite journal|last=Jiddu|first=Krishnamurti|date=1 January 1926|title=Editorial Notes|journal=The Herald of the Star |volume=XV|issue=1|page=3 |location=London |publisher=Theosophical Publishing House|oclc=225662044}}
|last=Lutyens |first=Mary |author-link=Mary Lutyens
*{{cite book|last=Jiddu|first=Krishnamurti|year=1928a|chapter-url=http://jiddu-krishnamurti.net/en/1927-the-pool-of-wisdom/jiddu-krishnamurti-the-pool-of-wisdom-07|chapter=Who brings the truth?|title=The pool of wisdom, Who brings the truth, By what authority, and three poems|location=[[Eerde, Ommen]]|publisher=Star Publishing Trust|pages=43–53|oclc=4894479|id=[[Saaremaa]], [[Estonia]]: jiddu-krishnamurti.net [web publisher]|access-date=7 October 2010}}
|year=1995b
*{{cite journal|last=Jiddu|first=Krishnamurti|date=September 1929|url=http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/about-krishnamurti/dissolution-speech.php|title=The dissolution of the Order of the Star: a statement by J. Krishnamurti|journal=International Star Bulletin|volume=3|issue=2 {{interp|issues renumbered starting August 1929}}|pages=28–34|location=[[Eerde, Ommen]]|publisher=Star Publishing Trust|oclc=34693176|id=J.Krishnamurti Online [web publisher]|access-date=9 March 2010}}
|title=The Boy Krishna: The first fourteen years in the life of J. Krishnamurti
*{{cite web|last=Jiddu|first=Krishnamurti|date=1 August 1965|url=http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=840&chid=5156|title=Tenth public talk at Saanen|work=J.Krishnamurti Online|id=[[#jko-sn|JKO 650801]]|publisher=Krishnamurti Foundations|access-date=15 May 2010|archive-date=19 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121019124929/http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=840&chid=5156|url-status=dead}}
|location=[[Bramdean]]
*{{cite book|last=Jiddu|first=Krishnamurti|year=1972|chapter-url=http://jiddu-krishnamurti.net/en/1927-1928-1929-early-writings/krishnamurti-early-writings-03-eerde-gathering-1927 | title=Early Writings of J. Krishnamurti | chapter=Eerde Gathering 1927, Questions and Answers|series=Early Writings|volume=II [Offprints from Chetana 1970]|location=[[Mumbai|Bombay]]|publisher=Chetana<!-- {{URL|1=http://www.chetana.com/p.htm|2=Chetana}} -->|pages=6–14|oclc=312923125|id=[[Saaremaa]], [[Estonia]]: jiddu-krishnamurti.net [web publisher]|access-date=21 December 2010}}
|publisher=Krishnamurti Foundation Trust
*{{cite book|last=Jiddu|first=Krishnamurti|year=1975b|orig-year=1969|title=Freedom from the Known|editor-link=Mary Lutyens|editor-last=Lutyens|editor-first=Mary|location=San Francisco|publisher=[[HarperCollins|Harper San Francisco]]|edition=reprint, 1st Harper paperback|isbn=978-0-06-064808-4|id=[[#jko-sn|JKO 237]]|title-link=Freedom from the Known}}
|type=[[pamphlet]]
*{{cite book|last=Jiddu|first=Krishnamurti|year=2004|orig-year=originally published 1982. San Francisco: [[HarperCollins|Harper & Row]]|title=Krishnamurti's Journal|location=[[Bramdean]]|publisher=Krishnamurti Foundation Trust|isbn=978-0-900506-23-9|title-link=Krishnamurti's Journal}}
|isbn=978-0-900506-13-0
*{{cite book|author-link=Mary Lutyens|last=Lutyens|first=Mary|year=1975|title=Krishnamurti: The Years of Awakening|location=New York|publisher=[[Farrar, Straus and Giroux]]|edition=1st US|isbn=978-0-374-18222-9}}
}}
*{{cite book|author-link=Mary Lutyens|last=Lutyens|first=Mary|year=1983b|title=Krishnamurti: The Years of Fulfilment|location=New York|publisher=[[Farrar, Straus and Giroux]]|edition=1st US|isbn=978-0-374-18224-3|url=https://archive.org/details/krishnamurti00mary}}
* {{cite book
*{{cite book|author-link=Mary Lutyens|last=Lutyens|first=Mary|year=1990|title=The life and death of Krishnamurti|location=London|publisher=[[John Murray (publishing house)|John Murray]]|edition=1st UK|isbn=978-0-7195-4749-2}}
|last=Lutyens |first=Mary |author-link=Mary Lutyens
*{{cite book|author-link=Mary Lutyens|last=Lutyens|first=Mary|year=1995|title=The boy Krishna: the first fourteen years in the life of J. Krishnamurti|location=[[Bramdean]]|publisher=Krishnamurti Foundation Trust|type=[[pamphlet]]|isbn=978-0-900506-13-0}}
|year=1975b
*{{cite book|last=Sloss|first=Radha Rajagopal|year=1991|location=London|publisher=[[Bloomsbury Publishing]]|title=Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti|edition=1st|isbn=978-0-7475-0720-8|title-link=Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti}}
|title=Krishnamurti: The years of awakening
*{{cite book|last=Vernon|first=Roland|year=2001|title=Star in the east: Krishnamurti: the invention of a messiah|location=New York|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan|Palgrave]]|isbn=978-0-312-23825-4|url=https://archive.org/details/starineastkrishn00vern}}
|location=New York, NY |publisher=[[Farrar, Straus and Giroux]]
*{{cite book|last=Williams|first=Christine V.|year=2004|title=Jiddu Krishnamurti: world philosopher (1895–1986): his life and thoughts|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NzDar6XfICEC|location=[[Delhi]]|publisher=[[Motilal Banarsidass]]|isbn=978-81-208-2032-6|access-date=3 October 2011}}
|edition=1st US
*{{cite book|last=Padmanabhan|first=Krishna|title= A jewel on a silver platter (Remembering Jiddu Krishnamurti)|location=[[Varanasi]]|publisher=[[Pilgrims publishing]]|isbn=978-93-5076-056-7|year=2015}}
|isbn=978-0-374-18222-9
}}
* {{cite book
|last=Lutyens |first=Mary |author-link=Mary Lutyens
|year=1983c
|title=Krishnamurti: The years of fulfilment
|location=New York, NY |publisher=[[Farrar, Straus and Giroux]]
|edition=1st US
|isbn=978-0-374-18224-3
|url=https://archive.org/details/krishnamurti00mary |via=[[Internet Archive]] (archive.org)
}}
* {{cite book
|last=Lutyens |first=Mary |author-link=Mary Lutyens
|year=1990b
|title=The Life and Death of Krishnamurti
|edition=1st U.K.
|location=London, UK
|publisher=[[John Murray (publishing house)|John Murray]]
|isbn=978-0-7195-4749-2
}}


==External links==
==External links==
 
{{Commons category|Jiddu Krishnamurti}}
 
{{wikisource|works=or}}
* [http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/ J. Krishnamurti Online] Official website&nbsp;— making available thousands of transcripts as well as many audio and video recordings. An international joint venture of the four Krishnamurti Foundations.
{{wikiquote}}
* {{Gutenberg author|id=3946}}
* {{Gutenberg author|id=3946}}
* {{Librivox author |id=17554}}
* {{Librivox author |id=17554}}
* [http://www.kfoundation.org/ Krishnamurti Foundation Trust] – Established in 1968 as an educational charitable trust, the Foundation exists to preserve and make available the teachings of J. Krishnamurti.
* {{cite web
* [http://ojaihistory.com/krishnamurti-and-the-ojai-valley/ Krishnamurti and the Ojai Valley]
|title=J. Krishnamurti online
* [http://bohmkrishnamurti.com/ The Bohm-Krishnamurti Project: Exploring the Legacy of the David Bohm and Jiddu Krishnamurti Relationship]
|type=official site
* [http://www.krishnamurticentre.org.uk/ The Krishnamurti Study Centre] A retreat centre in England
|website=jkrishnamurti.org
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160610144750/http://jkrishnamurti.waldenspath.com/ J Krishnamurti Study Centre] in Hyderabad, India
|url=http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/
* [https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00f7b1q The Levin Interviews] – [[Bernard Levin]]'s interviews with Jiddu Krishnamurti  
}}
* {{cite web
|title=Krishnamurti Foundation Trust
|type=main page
|website=kfoundation.org
|url=http://www.kfoundation.org/
|quote=Established in 1968 as an educational charitable trust, the Foundation exists to preserve and make available the teachings of J. Krishnamurti.
}}
* {{cite web |url=http://ojaihistory.com/krishnamurti-and-the-ojai-valley/ |title=Krishnamurti and the Ojai Valley }}
* {{cite web
|title=The Bohm-Krishnamurti project
|type=main page
|website=bohmkrishnamurti.com
|url=http://bohmkrishnamurti.com/
|quote=Exploring the legacy of the David Bohm and Jiddu Krishnamurti relationship
}}
* {{cite web
|title=The Krishnamurti Study Centre
|place=[[Brockwood Park]], [[Bramdean]], [[Hampshire]], UK
|url=http://www.krishnamurticentre.org.uk/
}}—A retreat centre in southern England
* {{cite web
|title=J. Krishnamurti Study Centre
|website=jkrishnamurti.waldenspath.com
|place=Hyderabad, India
|url=http://jkrishnamurti.waldenspath.com/  |url-status=dead <!-- presumed -->
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160610144750/http://jkrishnamurti.waldenspath.com/
|archive-date=2016-06-10
}}
* {{cite AV media
|series=The Levin Interviews
|date=20 June 1981
|interviewer-last=Levin |interviewer-first=B. |interviewer-link=Bernard Levin
|title=Jiddu Krishnamurti (interviewed)
|medium=TV program |publisher=[[BBC Two]]
|quote=Bernard Levin meets philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti at his school in Brockwood Park, Hants, where they discuss religion and the significance of thought.
|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00f7b1q |via=bbc.co.uk
}}
* {{cite web
|title=Krishnamurti, the lonely Hollywood star
|series=Age of Awareness |date=21 August 2020 |via=medium.com
|url=https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/krishnamurti-the-lonely-hollywood-star-413b29a76999
}}
* {{PM20|FID=pe/010474}}
* {{PM20|FID=pe/010474}}


Line 223: Line 880:
{{Modern Hindu writers}}
{{Modern Hindu writers}}
{{Theosophy series}}
{{Theosophy series}}
{{Hindu reform movements}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


Line 230: Line 888:
[[Category:1986 deaths]]
[[Category:1986 deaths]]
[[Category:20th-century Indian philosophers]]
[[Category:20th-century Indian philosophers]]
[[Category:Philosophers of love]]
[[Category:Deaths from pancreatic cancer in California]]
[[Category:Deaths from pancreatic cancer]]
[[Category:Deaths from cancer in California]]
[[Category:20th-century Hindu philosophers and theologians|Krishnamurti, J.]]
[[Category:20th-century Hindu philosophers and theologians|Krishnamurti, J.]]
[[Category:Indian spiritual writers|Krishnamurti, J.]]
[[Category:Indian spiritual writers|Krishnamurti, J.]]
[[Category:Telugu people]]
[[Category:Telugu people]]
[[Category:Former Theosophists]]
[[Category:Former Theosophists]]
[[Category:Theosophy|Krishnamurti, J.]]
[[Category:Indian Hindu spiritual teachers|Krishnamurti, J.]]
[[Category:Indian Hindu spiritual teachers|Krishnamurti, J.]]
[[Category:Founders of Indian schools and colleges]]
[[Category:Founders of Indian schools and colleges]]
[[Category:Founders of new religious movements]]
[[Category:Founders of new religious movements]]
[[Category:Religious writers]]
[[Category:Indian religious writers]]
[[Category:People from Rayalaseema]]
[[Category:People from Rayalaseema]]
[[Category:People from Chittoor district]]
[[Category:People from Chittoor district]]
Line 250: Line 905:
[[Category:Writers from Andhra Pradesh]]
[[Category:Writers from Andhra Pradesh]]
[[Category:Wikipedia articles containing unlinked shortened footnotes]]
[[Category:Wikipedia articles containing unlinked shortened footnotes]]
[[Category:Indian public speakers]]
[[Category:Indian adoptees]]

Latest revision as of 06:19, 24 March 2026


Jiddu Krishnamurti
Krishnamurti in the 1920s
Born(1895-05-11)11 May 1895
Died17 February 1986(1986-02-17) (aged 90)
Notable work
Era20th-century philosophy
Region
InstitutionsKrishnamurti Foundation (founder)

Jiddu Krishnamurti (/ˈɪd ˌkrɪʃnəˈmʊərti/ JID-oo KRISH-nə-MOOR-tee; 11 May 1895 – 17 February 1986) was an Indian spiritual figure, speaker, and writer. Adopted by members of the Theosophical Society as a child, Krishnamurti was raised to fill the mantle of the prophesied World Teacher, a role tasked with aiding humankind's spiritual evolution. In 1922, he began to suffer from painful, seizure-like mystical episodes that would produce a lasting change in his perception of reality.[lower-alpha 1][1][2][lower-alpha 2] In 1929, he broke from the Theosophy movement and disbanded the Order of the Star in the East which had been formed around him. He spent the rest of his life speaking to groups and individuals around the world, hoping to contribute a radical transformation of mankind.[3][4][lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 4][lower-alpha 5]

Krishnamurti asserted that "truth is a pathless land" and advised against following any doctrine, discipline, teacher, guru, or authority, including himself.[5] Nonetheless, during his life he tried to share his insights in 'the teachings', urging for a state without conceptual deliberations and thought.[lower-alpha 6] In Krishnamurti's perception, such a righteousness was only possible through the practice of passive or choiceless awareness, which he called the essence of "true meditation" in contrast to contrived techniques.[6][lower-alpha 7] He gained a wider recognition in the 1950s, after Aldous Huxley had introduced him to his mainstream publisher and the publication of The First and Last Freedom (1954). Many of his talks have been published since, among them Commentaries on Living (1956–60) and Krishnamurti's Notebook (written 1961-62).

A few days before his death he stated that nobody had understood what his body went through, and after his death, this consciousness would be gone, and no other body would support it "for many hundred years."[lower-alpha 8] His supporters—working through non-profit foundations in India, Britain, and the United States—oversee several independent schools based on his educational philosophy and continue to distribute his extensive body of talks, dialogues, and writings in various media formats and languages.

Biography[edit | edit source]

Family background and childhood[edit | edit source]

House in which Krishnamurti was born
House in Madanapalle, in which Krishnamurti was born
Krishnamurti in 1910

Born during the late British Raj, the date of birth of Krishnamurti is a matter of dispute. Mary Lutyens determines it to be 11 May 1895,[7] but Christine Williams notes the unreliability of birth registrations in that period and points to various claims placing his birth between 4 May 1895 and 25 May 1896. She used calculations based on a published horoscope to derive a date of 11 May 1895 but "retains a measure of scepticism" about it.[8]

His birthplace was the small town of Madanapalle in Madras Presidency (modern-day Annamayya District in Andhra Pradesh). He was born in a Telugu-speaking Brahmin family.[9][10] His father, Jiddu Narayanaiah, was employed as an official of the British colonial administration. Krishnamurti was fond of his mother Sanjeevamma, who died when he was ten.[11] His parents had a total of eleven children, of whom six survived childhood.[12]

In 1903 the family settled in Kadapa, where Krishnamurti had contracted malaria during a previous stay. He suffered recurrent bouts of the disease over many years.[13] A sensitive and sickly child, described as "vague and dreamy", he was often considered intellectually disabled and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father.[14] In memoirs written when he was eighteen years old Krishnamurti described psychic experiences, such as seeing his sister, who had died in 1904, and his late mother.[15] Even from his childhood he felt a bond with nature which was to stay with him for the rest of his life.[16] Writing in his journal Krishnamurti states "He always had this strange lack of distance between himself and the trees, rivers, mountains. It wasn't cultivated."[17]

Krishnamurti's father retired at the end of 1907 and then sought employment at the headquarters of the Theosophical Society at Adyar. Narayanaiah had been a Theosophist since 1882. He was eventually hired by the Society as a clerk, moving there with his family in January 1909.[18] Narayanaiah and his sons were at first assigned to live in a small cottage that was located just outside the society's compound.[19]

Krishnamurti was a vegetarian from birth, and his family were strict vegetarians. He was an opponent of meat eating, based on ethical and spiritual reasons.[20][21] Krishnamurti was also a "teetotaler, nonsmoker, and practitioner of yoga."[22]

Appropriation by the Theosophical Society[edit | edit source]

In April 1909, Krishnamurti first met Charles Webster Leadbeater, who claimed clairvoyance. Leadbeater had noticed Krishnamurti on the Society's beach on the Adyar river, and was amazed by the "most wonderful aura he had ever seen, without a particle of selfishness in it."[lower-alpha 9] Ernest Wood, an adjutant of Leadbeater's at the time, who helped Krishnamurti with his homework, considered him to be "particularly dim-witted."[24] Leadbeater was convinced that the boy would become a spiritual teacher and a great orator; the likely "vehicle for the Lord Maitreya" in Theosophical doctrine, an advanced spiritual entity periodically appearing on Earth as a World Teacher to guide the evolution of humankind.[24][25] This World teacher "was supposed to "overshadow" Krishnamurti by using his body to communicate with humanity. There was no thought among Theosophists of Krishnamurti himself being the World Teacher; he was merely to be the channel through which the World Teacher would speak."[25]

In her biography of Krishnamurti, Pupul Jayakar quotes his reflection on that period in his life some 75 years later: "The boy had always said 'I will do whatever you want.' There was an element of subservience, obedience. The boy was vague, uncertain, woolly; he didn't seem to care what was happening. He was like a vessel with a large hole in it, whatever was put in, went through, nothing remained."[26] Krishnamurti himself described his state of mind as a young boy: "No thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was no image-making. He often attempted to think but no thought would come."[27]

Krishnamurti by Tomás Povedano

Following his discovery by Leadbeater, Krishnamurti was nurtured by the Theosophical Society in Adyar. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and generally preparing Krishnamurti as the "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (often later called Krishnaji)[28][lower-alpha 10] and his younger brother Nityananda (Nitya) were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and later exposed to an opulent life among a segment of European high society as they continued their education abroad. Despite his history of problems with schoolwork and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the 14 year-old Krishnamurti was able to speak and write competently in English within six months.[29] Lutyens says that later in life Krishnamurti came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event. When he was asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater he unhesitatingly replied "I would have died".[30]

During this time Krishnamurti had developed a strong bond with Annie Besant and came to view her as a surrogate mother. His father, who had initially assented to Besant's legal guardianship of Krishnamurti,[31] was pushed into the background by the swirl of attention around his son. In 1912 he sued Besant to annul the guardianship agreement. After a protracted legal battle, Besant took custody of Krishnamurti and Nitya.[32] As a result of this separation from family and home Krishnamurti and his brother (whose relationship had always been very close) became more dependent on each other, and in the following years often travelled together.[33]

In 1911 the Theosophical Society established the Order of the Star in the East (OSE) to prepare the world for the expected appearance of the World Teacher. Krishnamurti was named as its head, with senior Theosophists assigned various other positions. Membership was open to anybody who accepted the doctrine of the Coming of the World Teacher. Controversy soon erupted, both within the Theosophical Society and outside it, in Hindu circles and the Indian press.[lower-alpha 11]

Preparation as the World Teacher[edit | edit source]

Mary Lutyens, a biographer, says that there was a time when Krishnamurti believed that he was to become the World Teacher after correct spiritual and secular guidance and education.[34] Another biographer describes the daily program imposed on him by Leadbeater and his associates, which included rigorous exercise and sports, tutoring in a variety of school subjects, Theosophical and religious lessons, yoga and meditation, as well as instruction in proper hygiene and in the ways of British society and culture.[35] At the same time Leadbeater assumed the role of guide in a parallel mystical instruction of Krishnamurti; the existence and progress of this instruction was at the time known only to a select few.[36]

While he showed a natural aptitude in sports, Krishnamurti always had problems with formal schooling and was not academically inclined. He eventually gave up university education after several attempts at admission. He did take to foreign languages, in time speaking several with some fluency.[37]

His public image, cultivated by the Theosophists, "was to be characterized by a well-polished exterior, a sobriety of purpose, a cosmopolitan outlook and an otherworldly, almost beatific detachment in his demeanor."[38] Demonstrably, "all of these can be said to have characterized Krishnamurti's public image to the end of his life."[38] It was apparently clear early on that he "possessed an innate personal magnetism, not of a warm physical variety, but nonetheless emotive in its austerity, and inclined to inspire veneration."[39] However, as he was growing up, Krishnamurti showed signs of adolescent rebellion and emotional instability, chafing at the regimen imposed on him, visibly uncomfortable with the publicity surrounding him, and occasionally expressing doubts about the future prescribed for him.[lower-alpha 12]

Photograph of Krishnamurti with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and others in London 1911
Krishnamurti in England in 1911 with his brother Nitya, Annie Besant, and George Arundale

Krishnamurti and Nitya were taken to England in April 1911.[40] During this trip Krishnamurti gave his first public speech to members of the OSE in London.[41] His first writings had also started to appear, published in booklets by the Theosophical Society and in Theosophical and OSE-affiliated magazines.[lower-alpha 13] Between 1911 and the start of World War I in 1914, the brothers visited several other European countries, always accompanied by Theosophist chaperones.[42] Meanwhile, Krishnamurti had for the first time acquired a measure of personal financial independence, thanks to Mary Melissa Hoadley Dodge – a wealthy American benefactress then resident in England.[43]

After the war, Krishnamurti embarked on a series of lectures, meetings and discussions around the world, related to his duties as the Head of the OSE, accompanied by Nitya, by then the Organizing Secretary of the Order.[44] Krishnamurti also continued writing.[lower-alpha 14] The content of his talks and writings revolved around the work of the Order and of its members in preparation for the coming. He was initially described as a halting, hesitant, and repetitive speaker, but his delivery and confidence improved, and he gradually took command of the organization's meetings.[45]

In 1921 Krishnamurti fell in love with Helen Knothe, a 17-year-old American, whose family associated with the Theosophists. The experience was tempered by the realisation that his work and expected life-mission precluded what would otherwise be considered normal relationships and by the mid-1920s the two of them had drifted apart.[46] She later said that Krishnamurti's attitudes were conditioned by privilege, because he had been supported, even pampered, by devoted followers from the time of his "discovery" by the theosophists. She also said that he was at such an "elevated" level that he was incapable of forming "normal personal relationships".[47]

Taking residence at Ojai, 'the process', and growing expectations[edit | edit source]

In 1922 Krishnamurti and Nitya travelled from Sydney to California. In California, they stayed at a cottage in the Ojai Valley. It was thought that the area's climate would be beneficial to Nitya, who had been diagnosed with tuberculosis. Nitya's failing health became a concern for Krishnamurti.[48][49] At Ojai they met Rosalind Williams, a young American who became close to them both, and who was later to play a significant role in Krishnamurti's life.[50] For the first time the brothers were without immediate supervision by their Theosophical Society minders.[51] They found the Valley to be very agreeable. Eventually, a trust, formed by supporters, bought a cottage and surrounding property there for them. This became Krishnamurti's official residence.[52]

'The process'[edit | edit source]

At Ojai in August and September 1922, Krishnamurti went through a series of "disturbing physical symptoms that progressed from discomfort to pain,"[53] during which he mistook Rosalind for his mother,[54] interpreted by some of his followers as intense 'life-changing' experiences'and signs of his advancement along 'the path'.[55][56] The initial events happened in two distinct phases: First a three-day acute pain in the neck accompanied by a mystical experience,[57][58] and two weeks later, a longer-lasting condition that Krishnamurti and those around him referred to as the process. This condition recurred, at frequent intervals and with varying intensity, until his death.[58]

According to Krishnamurti, Nitya, Rosalind, and Mr. Warrington, it started on 17 August 1922 when Krishnamurti complained of a sharp pain at the nape of his neck. Over the next two days the symptoms worsened, with increasing pain and sensitivity, loss of appetite, and occasional delirious ramblings. He seemed to lapse into unconsciousness but later recounted that he was very much aware of his surroundings, and that while in that state at 19 August 1922 he had "the first most extraordinary experience", in which he felt "at one with his surroundings".[59][60][lower-alpha 15] The following day the symptoms and the experience intensified, and he had an out-of-body experience, feeling "the vibrations of Lord Buddha,"[61] experiencing peace and a "profound calmness".[62][61] Krishnamurti also wrote that he had "touched compassion which heals all sorrow and suffering; it is not for myself, but for the world".[61][lower-alpha 16]

Following – and apparently related to – these events[63][64] the condition that came to be known as the process started to affect him, in September and October that year, as a regular, almost nightly occurrence. Later the process resumed intermittently, with varying degrees of pain, physical discomfort, and sensitivity, occasionally a lapse into a childlike state, and sometimes an apparent fading out of consciousness, explained as either his body giving in to pain or his mind "going off".[lower-alpha 17]

'The Otherness'[edit | edit source]

These experiences were accompanied or followed by what was interchangeably described as, "the benediction", "the immensity", "the sacredness", "the vastness" and, most often, "the otherness" or "the other".[65] It was a state related to, but distinct from the process.[66] According to Lutyens it is evident from his notebook that this experience of otherness was "with him almost continuously" during his life, and gave him "a sense of being protected".[65] Krishnamurti describes it in his notebook as typically following an acute experience of the process, for example, on awakening the next day:

... woke up early with that strong feeling of otherness, of another world that is beyond all thought ... there is a heightening of sensitivity. Sensitivity, not only to beauty but also to all other things. The blade of grass was astonishingly green; that one blade of grass contained the whole spectrum of colour; it was intense, dazzling and such a small thing, so easy to destroy ...[67]

This experience of the otherness was present with him in daily events:

It is strange how during one or two interviews that strength, that power filled the room. It seemed to be in one's eyes and breath. It comes into being, suddenly and most unexpectedly, with a force and intensity that is quite overpowering and at other times it's there, quietly and serenely. But it's there, whether one wants it or not. There is no possibility of getting used to it for it has never been nor will it ever be ..."[67]

Secretiveness and explanations[edit | edit source]

Lutyens (1975) revealed the existence of the process in The Years of Awakening, the first volume of her biography of Krishnamurti.[1] The existence and history of these experiences had remained unknown outside of the Theosophical Society leadership and Krishnamurti's circle of close associates and friends.[68][69][lower-alpha 1]

Roland Vernon, another of his biographers, states that previous attempts (by others) at revealing details from his past, including these reputed experiences, were suppressed by Krishnamurti. According to Vernon, Krishnamurti "believed, with good reason, that the sensationalism of his early story would cloud the public's perception of his Template:Interp current work".[70] Krishnamurti himself gave the following description of his development to Rom Landau in 1935:

Rom Landau: How did you come to that state of unity with everything?

Krishnamurti: People have asked me about that before, and I always feel that they expect to hear the dramatic account of some sudden miracle through which I suddenly became one with the universe. Of course nothing of the sort happened. My inner awareness was always there; though it took me time to feel it more and more clearly; and equally it took time to find words that would at all describe it.
It was not a sudden flash, but a slow yet constant clarification of something that was always there. It did not grow, as people often think. Nothing can grow in us that is of spiritual importance. It has to be there in all its fullness, and then the only thing that happens is that we become more and more aware of it. It is our intellectual reaction and nothing else that needs time to become more articulate, more definite.[71]

However Krishnamurti often hinted at otherness-like states in later talks and discussions:[72][73] During Krishnamurti's later years, the nature and provenance of the continuing process often came up as a subject in private discussions between himself and associates, also stating that the experience of the otherness continued as he was nearing death. These discussions shed some light on the subject but were ultimately inconclusive.[74][lower-alpha 18]

Since the initial occurrences of 1922, several explanations have been proposed for these experiences of Krishnamurti's, including epilepsy.[2][lower-alpha 2] Leadbeater and other Theosophists expected the "vehicle" to have certain paranormal experiences but were nevertheless mystified by these developments.[75]

Growing expectations[edit | edit source]

As news of these experiences spread, rumours concerning the messianic status of Krishnamurti reached fever pitch as the 1925 Theosophical Society Convention was planned, on the 50th anniversary of its founding. There were expectations of significant happenings.[76] Paralleling the increasing adulation was Krishnamurti's growing discomfort with it. In related developments, prominent Theosophists and their factions within the Society were trying to position themselves favourably relative to the Coming, which was widely rumoured to be approaching. He stated that "Too much of everything is bad". "Extraordinary" pronouncements of spiritual advancement were made by various parties, disputed by others, and the internal Theosophical politics further alienated Krishnamurti.[77]

Death of Nitya[edit | edit source]

Nitya's persistent health problems had periodically resurfaced throughout this time. On 13 November 1925, at age 27, he died in Ojai from complications of influenza and tuberculosis.[78] Despite Nitya's poor health, his death was unexpected, and it fundamentally shook Krishnamurti's belief in Theosophy and in the leaders of the Theosophical Society. He had received their assurances regarding Nitya's health, and had come to believe that "Nitya was essential for [his] life-mission and therefore he would not be allowed to die," a belief shared by Annie Besant and Krishnamurti's circle.[79] Jayakar wrote that "his belief in the Masters and the hierarchy had undergone a total revolution."[80] Moreover, Nitya had been the "last surviving link to his family and childhood. ... The only person to whom he could talk openly, his best friend and companion."[81] According to eyewitness accounts, the news "broke him completely."[82] but 12 days after Nitya's death he was "immensely quiet, radiant, and free of all sentiment and emotion";[80] "there was not a shadow ... to show what he had been through."[83]

Break with the Theosophical Society[edit | edit source]

Over the next few years, Krishnamurti's self-awareness and alienation from the Theosophical worldview continued to develop. He lost his faith in 'The Masters',[25] and new concepts appeared in his talks, discussions, and correspondence, together with an evolving vocabulary that was progressively free of Theosophical terminology.[84] His new direction reached a climax in 1929, when he rebuffed attempts by Leadbeater and Besant to continue with the Order of the Star.

Krishnamurti dissolved the Order during the annual Star Camp at Ommen, the Netherlands, on 3 August 1929.[85] He stated that he had made his decision after "careful consideration" during the previous two years, and turned against the Theosophical Society's elaborate worldview of spiritual progress, stating that:

I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce people along a particular path. ... This is no magnificent deed, because I do not want followers, and I mean this. The moment you follow someone you cease to follow Truth. I am not concerned whether you pay attention to what I say or not. I want to do a certain thing in the world and I am going to do it with unwavering concentration. I am concerning myself with only one essential thing: to set man free. I desire to free him from all cages, from all fears, and not to found religions, new sects, nor to establish new theories and new philosophies.[86][87]

Krishnamurti in the early 1920s

Following the dissolution, prominent Theosophists turned against Krishnamurti, including Leadbeater who is said to have stated, "the Coming had gone wrong."[88] Krishnamurti had denounced all organised belief, the notion of gurus, and the whole teacher-follower relationship, vowing instead to work on setting people "absolutely, unconditionally free."[86] There is no record of his explicitly denying he was the World Teacher;[89] whenever he was asked to clarify his position he either asserted that the matter was irrelevant,[lower-alpha 19] or gave answers that, as he stated, were "purposely vague".[lower-alpha 20]

In hind-sight it can be seen that the ongoing changes in his outlook had begun before the dissolution of the Order of the Star.[90] The subtlety of the new distinctions on the World Teacher issue was lost on many of his admirers, who were already bewildered or distraught because of the changes in Krishnamurti's outlook, vocabulary and pronouncements–among them Besant and Mary Lutyens' mother Emily, who had a very close relationship with him.[91][92] He soon disassociated himself from the Theosophical Society and its teachings and practices,[lower-alpha 21] yet he remained on cordial terms with some of its members and ex-members throughout his life.[94]

Krishnamurti resigned from the various trusts and other organisations that were affiliated with the defunct Order of the Star, including the Theosophical Society. He returned the money and properties donated to the Order, among them a castle in the Netherlands and 5,000 acres (2,023 ha) of land, to their donors.[95]

Middle years – Arya Vihara and extra-marital affair[edit | edit source]

From 1930 through 1944 Krishnamurti engaged in speaking tours and in the issue of publications under the auspice of the "Star Publishing Trust" (SPT), which he had founded with Desikacharya Rajagopal, a close associate and friend from the Order of the Star.[lower-alpha 22] Ojai was the base of operations for the new enterprise, where Krishnamurti, Rajagopal, and Rosalind Williams (who had married Rajagopal in 1927) resided in the house known as Arya Vihara (meaning Realm of the Aryas, i.e. those noble by righteousness in Sanskrit). The business and organizational aspects of the SPT were administered chiefly by D. Rajagopal, as Krishnamurti devoted his time to speaking and meditation.[96]

The Rajagopals' marriage was not a happy one, and the two became physically estranged after the 1931 birth of their daughter, Radha.[96] Krishnamurti's friendship with Rosalind became a love affair. According to Radha Rajagopal Sloss, the affair between Krishnamurti and Rosalind began in 1932 and it endured for about twenty-five years. Radha Sloss, daughter of Rajagopal, wrote about the affair in her book Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti.[lower-alpha 23] According to Radha Rajagopal Sloss, Krishnamurti was dependent on his followers to support his way of life, and needed to uphold his image of a celibate guru to continue this support and way of life.[97][lower-alpha 24]

During the 1930s Krishnamurti spoke in Europe, Latin America, India, Australia and the United States. He did not speak publicly for a period of about four years (between 1940 and 1944). During this time he lived and worked at Arya Vihara, which during the war operated as a largely self-sustaining farm, with its surplus goods donated for relief efforts in Europe.[98] Of the years spent in Ojai during the war he later said: : "I think it was a period of no challenge, no demand, no outgoing. I think it was a kind of everything held in; and when I left Ojai it all burst."[99]

English author Aldous Huxley lived nearby; he met Krishnamurti in 1938,[100] and the two men became close friends.[101][102] They held common concerns about the imminent conflict in Europe which they viewed as the outcome of the pernicious influence of nationalism.[103] Krishnamurti's stance on World War II was often construed as pacifism and even subversion during a time of patriotic fervor in the United States and for a time he came under the surveillance of the FBI.[104]

Huxley encouraged Krishnamurti to write,[105] and also introduced his work to Harper, Huxley's own publisher. This eventually led to the addition of Krishnamurti in the publisher's roster of authors;Template:Nnbsp[106] Radha Rajagopal Sloss, daughter of D. Rajagopal, Krishnamurti's business manager at the time, states that Huxley introduced her father to the publisher. She adds that Krishnamurti had little interest in his manuscripts or other records of his work; this lack of interest by Krishnamurti is also remarked upon by his biographers.[107] Until that time Krishnamurti works were published by small or specialist presses, or in-house by a variety of Krishnamurti-related organizations.[108][109]

Krishnamurti broke the hiatus from public speaking in May 1944 with a series of talks in Ojai. These talks, and subsequent material, were published by "Krishnamurti Writings Inc." (KWINC), the successor organisation to the "Star Publishing Trust". This was to be the new central Krishnamurti-related entity worldwide, whose sole purpose was the dissemination of the teaching.[110] Initially, Krishnamurti (along with Rajagopal and others) was a trustee of KWINC. Eventually he ceased being a trustee, leaving Rajagopal as President – a turn of events that according to Lutyens, constituted "... a circumstance that was to have most unhappy consequences." He had remained in contact with associates from India, and in the autumn of 1947 embarked on a speaking tour there, attracting a new following of young intellectuals.[lower-alpha 25] On this trip he encountered the Mehta sisters, Pupul and Nandini, who became lifelong associates and confidants. The sisters also attended to Krishnamurti throughout a 1948 recurrence of the "process" in Ootacamund.[111] In Poona in 1948, Krishnamurti met Iyengar, who taught him Yoga practices every morning for the next three months, then on and off for twenty years.[112]

Later years – wider recognition, legal battles, and final evaluation[edit | edit source]

Krishnamurti continued speaking in public lectures, group discussions and with concerned individuals around the world. In 1954 The First and Last Freedom was published, which was instrumental in broadening Krishnamurti's audience and exposing his ideas. It was one of the first Krishnamurti titles in the world of mainstream, commercial publishing, where its success helped establish him as a viable author. It consists of edited excerpts from his public talks and discussions, and includes examinations of subjects that were, or became, recurrent themes in his exposition:Template:Nnbsp[113] the nature of the self – and of belief, investigations into fear and desire, the relationship between thinker and thought, the concept of choiceless awareness, the function of the mind, etc.

In the early 1960s, he made the acquaintance of physicist David Bohm, whose philosophical and scientific concerns regarding the essence of the physical world, and the psychological and sociological state of mankind, found parallels in Krishnamurti's philosophy. The two men soon became close friends and started a common inquiry, in the form of personal dialogues–and occasionally in group discussions with other participants–that continued, periodically, over nearly two decades.[lower-alpha 26] Several of these discussions were published in the form of books or as parts of books, and introduced a wider audience (among scientists) to Krishnamurti's ideas. The long friendship with Bohm went through a rocky interval in later years, and although they overcame their differences and remained friends until Krishnamurti's death, the relationship did not regain its previous intensity.[citation needed][lower-alpha 27]

Krishnamurti's once close relationship with the Rajagopals had deteriorated to the point where he took D. Rajagopal to court to recover donated property and funds as well as publication rights for his works, manuscripts, and personal correspondence, that were in Rajagopal's possession.[lower-alpha 28] The litigation and ensuing cross complaints, which formally began in 1971, continued for many years. Much property and materials were returned to Krishnamurti during his lifetime; the parties to this case finally settled all other matters in 1986, shortly after his death.[lower-alpha 29] Krishnamurti' stance raised doubts in long-time friends and devotees, some of whom got the impression that he was a divided personality unable to live according to his own teachings[114] – raising the question: "If he cannot live it, who can?"[115]

In 1984 and 1985, Krishnamurti spoke to an invited audience at the United Nations in New York, under the auspices of the Pacem in Terris Society chapter at the United Nations.[116][117] In October 1985, he visited India for the last time, holding a number of what came to be known as "farewell" talks and discussions between then and January 1986. These last talks included the fundamental questions he had been asking through the years, as well as newer concerns about advances in science and technology, and their effect on humankind. Krishnamurti had commented to friends that he did not wish to invite death, but was not sure how long his body would last (he had already lost considerable weight), and once he could no longer talk, he would have "no further purpose". In his final talk, on 4 January 1986, in Madras, he again invited the audience to examine with him the nature of inquiry, the effect of technology, the nature of life and meditation, and the nature of creation.[citation needed]

Krishnamurti was also concerned about his legacy, about being unwittingly turned into some personage whose teachings had been handed down to special individuals, rather than the world at large. He did not want anybody to pose as an interpreter of the teaching.[118]: He warned his associates on several occasions that they were not to present themselves as spokesmen on his behalf, or as his successors after his death.[118]:

A few days before his death, in a final statement, possibly in response to a question by Mary Cadogan, he stated an 'immense energy and intelligence went through this body." Nobody had understood what his body went through, and after his death, this consciousness would be gone, and no other body would support it "for many hundred years." He further added that "Perhaps they will somewhat if they live the teachings. But nobody has done it. Nobody. And so that's that."[lower-alpha 8]

Death[edit | edit source]

Krishnamurti died of pancreatic cancer on 17 February 1986, at the age of 90. The announcement of KFT (Krishnamurti Foundation Trust) refers to the course of his health condition until the moment of death. The first signs came almost nine months before his death, when he felt very tired. In October 1985, he went from Bramdean, England (Brockwood Park School) to India and after that, he suffered from exhaustion, fevers, and lost weight. Krishnamurti decided to go back to Ojai (10 January 1986) after his last talks in Madras, which necessitated a 24-hour flight. Once he arrived at Ojai he underwent medical tests that revealed he was suffering from pancreatic cancer. The cancer was untreatable, either surgically or otherwise, so Krishnamurti decided to go back to his home at Ojai, where he spent his last days. Friends and professionals nursed him. His mind was clear until the last moment. Krishnamurti died on 17 February 1986, at 10 minutes past midnight, California time. In accordance with his wishes, no memorial service was conducted.[22][119] His ashes were divided into three parts: For Ojai, India, and England. In India they were immersed in River Ganga in Varanasi, Gangotri, and in the ocean Adayar beach.[120]

Schools[edit | edit source]

Krishnamurti on a 1987 Indian stamp

Krishnamurti founded five schools in India, the oldest being Rishi Valley School that he founded in 1928 in Andhra Pradesh, ten miles from Madanapalle, his birthplace.[121] He also founded one in England, Brockwood Park School in 1969,[122] and one in California, Oak Grove School. When asked, he enumerated the following as his educational aims:

  1. Global outlook: A vision of the whole as distinct from the part; there should never be a sectarian outlook, but always a holistic outlook free from all prejudice.
  2. Concern for man and the environment: Humanity is part of nature, and if nature is not cared for, it will boomerang on man. Only the right education, and deep affection between people everywhere, will resolve many problems including the environmental challenges.
  3. Religious spirit, which includes the scientific temper: The religious mind is alone, not lonely. It is in communion with people and nature.[123]

The Krishnamurti Foundations, established in India, USA, and England in the 1960s manage seven schools in India and abroad.

'The teaching' – self-observation and 'vast emptiness'[edit | edit source]

A keen observer of the beauty of nature, Krishnamurti had strong convictions about the brutality and self-destruction of humanity, urging for an immediate righteousness without conceptual deliberations and thought.[lower-alpha 6] In Krishnamurti's perception, such a righteousness was only possible through a radical transformation of the mind, wholeheartedly but with detachment observing its workings and limitations.[6] He was convinced that he was 'chosen' by an 'immense intelligence' which used his body to convey this message to mankind,[124][lower-alpha 4][lower-alpha 5] but realised at his deathbed that nobody had experienced this 'intelligence' the way he had.[lower-alpha 8]

Self-perception: vast emptiness and saviour-role[edit | edit source]

Peter Michel notes that "Mystical experiences determined Krishnamurti's entire life, and cannot be separated from his teachings."[25] According to Krishnamurti,

an "immense energy and intelligence went through this body," a consciousness which he called "the otherness."[lower-alpha 8]

It manifested in the absence of thought, and to Mary Lutyens, his biographer, he said

"If I was writing the life, I would start with the vacant mind,"[125][lower-alpha 30]

while at his deathbed he referred to "that vast emptiness."[126] Krishnamurti saw himself as free and unconditioned,[lower-alpha 3] imploring his audiences to understand his state of being and aiming for such like-minded spirits to transform the world;[lower-alpha 4][lower-alpha 5] and he often referred to the totality of his work as the teachings, and not as my teachings.[129] He once compared himself to Thomas Edison, suggesting that he had blazed a trail for others to follow. Those who came after wouldn't need his special gifts: They would only need to turn the switch.[130][131]

Self-observation[edit | edit source]

According to the Krishnamurti Foundations, the core of Krishnamurti's teachings is contained in his 1929 statement, in which he rejected the Theosophical Society and their elaborate system of spiritual progress guided by 'Masters'.[132] In this speech, Krishnamurti asserted that "truth is a pathless land" and advised against following any doctrine, discipline, teacher, guru, or authority, including himself.[133]

Shai Tubali notes that Krishnamurti's teachings were essentially dialogical in nature, aiming at 'transformative dialogue'.[134] Yet, as summarized by John Algeo, Peter Michel observes that "real dialogue is conspicuously lacking; such apparent invitations [to look into this together] were rhetorical introductions to a monologue."[25] According to Krishnamurti, a radical transformation was necessary,[135] a transformation which could be achieved by anyone, without the aid of a teacher or guru.[136]

One has to live "psychologically alone [...] without depending on anything or anyone,"[135] living in complete attention to observe and let go of the contents of consciousness.[137]

Asked to summarize the teaching in one sentence, Krishnamurti answered "Attempt without effort to live with death in futureless silence, elaborating that

"death is the end of all you are afraid to lose: Your attachments, your memory, your disappeared friends, your prestige [...] All that is the content of your consciousness. Can you get rid of it right now?"[138]

Krishnamurti also summarized his the teachings as stating that truth cannot be reached through organised religion or techniques, but through relationship, self-understanding and self-observation.[132] The mental representations ("images") man has built shield him from fear, but also disturb his perception. Freedom is freedom from these conceptions, and is contained in pure observation, in "choiceless awareness of our daily existence and activity."[132] He dismissed the need for contrived meditation techniques, instead emphasizing the practice of choiceless awareness as the essence of "true meditation".[lower-alpha 31]

In his meetings with Nehru in 1947, Krishnamurti elaborated at length on the teachings, saying in one instance,

"Understanding of the self only arises in relationship, in watching yourself in relationship to people, ideas, and things; to trees, the earth, and the world around you and within you. Relationship is the mirror in which the self is revealed. Without self-knowledge there is no basis for right thought and action."

Nehru asked, "How does one start?" to which Krishnamurti replied,

"Begin where you are. Read every word, every phrase, every paragraph of the mind, as it operates through thought."[140]

In Beyond Violence, Krishnamurti stated "Observe the self in operation, learn about it, watch it, be aware of it. Do not try to destroy it, get rid of it or change it – just watch it, without any choice or distortion. Out of that watching and learning, the self disappears."

Influence – 'nobody understood'[edit | edit source]

While his personal charisma affected many,[25] both Krishnamurti himself and many commentators have noted that his teachings do not seem to have changed any person.[141][142][25] At his deathbed he stated that

"[p]erhaps they will somewhat [get into touch with that energy] if they live the teachings. But nobody has done it. Nobody. And so that's that."[lower-alpha 8]

He also stated

"if you all knew what you have missed – that vast emptiness."[126]

Krishnamurti tried to convey his experience of "the otherness" to others, but without a 'method', as this would be another "thought-control method."[143] In 1935, Rom Landau asked him "How do you expect to help others?" adding "you forget that we all, millions and millions of us, live in the vast plains at the foot of the mountain."[144] To this, Krishnamurti answered:

How can you expect me to be concerned with what should be done or how it should be done? If you have once lived on a mountain top, you cannot return to the plains. You can only try to make other people feel the purity of the air and enjoy the infinite prospect, and become one with the beauty of life there.[145][lower-alpha 16]

Emily Lutyens once wrote to him:

"You seem surprised that people do not understand you but I should be far more surprised if they did! After all, you are upsetting everything in which they have ever believed – knocking out their foundations and putting in its place a nebulous abstraction."[146]

Mary Lutyens noted a quite utilitarian motive in Krishnamurti's audiences, stating that

"the possibility he holds out of an almost instantaneous psychological transformation in each one of us which will end sorrow and solve all our problems is so irresistible"

that people kept coming to his talks,[147] a motive quite different from Krishnamurti's aim of radical righteousness.

Nevertheless, interest in Krishnamurti and his work has persisted in the years since his death. Many books, audio, video, and computer materials, remain in print and are carried by major online and traditional retailers. The four official Foundations continue to maintain archives, disseminate the teachings in an increasing number of languages, convert print to digital and other media, develop websites, sponsor television programs, and organise meetings and dialogues of interested persons around the world.[148]

Notable admirers and meetings[edit | edit source]

KFI retreat at Rishi Valley
KFI retreat session at Rishi Valley on 17 November 2019, Padmanabhan Krishna addressing the gathering, with Radhika Herzberger presiding

Notable individuals influenced by Krishnamurti include George Bernard Shaw, David Bohm, Jawaharlal Nehru, the Dalai Lama, Aldous Huxley, Alan Watts,[149] Henry Miller, Bruce Lee,[150] Terence Stamp,[151] Jackson Pollock,[152] Toni Packer,[153] Achyut Patwardhan,[154] Dada Dharmadhikari,[155] Derek Trucks,[156] U.G. Krishnamurti and Eckhart Tolle.[157]

George Bernard Shaw in his later years was acquainted with Krishnamurti and declared Krishnamurti to be the "most beautiful human being" he had ever met.[158] In 1938 he met Aldous Huxley.[159] The two began a close friendship which endured for many years.[103]

When Krishnamurti was in India in 1947 many prominent personalities came to meet him, including Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.[140] In the 1970s, Krishnamurti met several times with then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi, with whom he had far-ranging, and in some cases, very serious conversations. Jayakar considers his message in meetings with Indira Gandhi as a possible influence in the lifting of certain emergency measures Gandhi had imposed during periods of political turmoil.[160]

Krishnamurti was very highly regarded by several leading religious figures in India. Nisargadatta Maharaj described Krishnamurti as 'complete Brahman'.[161] Anandamayi Ma addressed him as the 'Guru of gurus'.[162] When Ramana Maharshi was asked why Krishnamurti dissolved the Order of the Star in the East, he replied "The Order's purpose stood consummated in that the World Teacher had arrived; that is why it was dissolved."[163] He engaged in discussions with several well known Hindu and Buddhist scholars and leaders, including the Dalai Lama.[lower-alpha 32] Several of these discussions were later published as chapters in various Krishnamurti books.

In his later years, he met with many prominent religious leaders and scholars including Swami Venkatesananda, Anandamayi Ma, Lakshman Joo, Walpola Rahula, and Eugene Schalert. In India he also met with many sanyasis and monks throughout his life.

Although Krishnamurti's philosophy delved into fields as diverse as religious studies, education, psychology, physics, and consciousness studies, he was not then, nor since, well known in academic circles. Nevertheless, Krishnamurti met and held discussions with physicists Fritjof Capra and E. C. George Sudarshan, biologist Rupert Sheldrake, psychiatrist David Shainberg, as well as psychotherapists representing various theoretical orientations.[164]

In 1974 Krishnamurti was interviewed on PBS television in a series of 19 dialogues with Alan W. Anderson. The dialogues resulted in two books being published.[165][166]

In popular culture[edit | edit source]

A sample of Krishnamurti's 1980 talk "Why does the mind constantly seek pleasure?" appears in the Tube & Berger song "Imprint of Pleasure".[167]

Krishnamurti is one of the people who Indiana Jones meets in The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles. Krishnamurti is shown as a young boy around 10–12 years old, this is around the time that he was first associated with the Theosophical Society. He meets and becomes friends with Indy in Season 2 episode 15 titled "Benares, January 1910" (later re-edited into the episode "Journey of Radiance"). Indy, his parents and his tutor Miss Seymour attend a meeting of the society.

Krishnamurti appears as an important character in James Harpur's 2021 novel, The Pathless Country.[168]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Krishnamurti allowed information about the process and other details of his life to become public knowledge through Lutyens' biography, which included extensive descriptions of the first such occurrences (Lutyens 1975, chs. "18: The Turning Point", "21: Climax of the Process" Template:Pp. Template:Interp).
  2. 2.0 2.1 A range of explanations have been given Vernon (2001), p. 124-128. Jayakar (1986), p. 46n and Lutyens (1975), p. 166 provide a frequently given explanation, that it represented the so-called awakening of kundalini – a process that according to Hindu mysticism culminates in transcendent consciousness. Others view it in Freudian terms. Aberbach (1993) contends that the experiences were a projection of Krishnamurti's accumulated grief over the death of his mother. Sloss (1993), pp. 58–61 attributes the onset to Krishnamurti's meditation practice, but also considers the process to be a purely physical event caused by malaria, dissociation accompanied by hallucinations, or the need to receive motherly care, noting that
    "[i]n the future these symptoms would be witnessed usually by a woman for whom Krashna felt a special involvement or love."
    She also suggests the possibility of epilepsy. See also Ecstatic seizures, and "Akasha, saga, temporal lobe epilepsy, and aphantasia". 14 May 2024 – via neuromythography.org..
    Lutyens (1990) rejects this possibility: According to Lutyens (1990), pp. 45–46, Krishnamurti believed the process was necessary for his spiritual development and not a medical matter or condition. As far as he was concerned, he had encountered Truth; he thought the process was in some way related to this encounter, and to later experiences.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Krishnamurti:
    "I have no ego!"[127]
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Krishnamurti:
    "Because I am free, unconditioned, whole, not the part, not the relative, but the whole Truth that is eternal, I desire those, who seek to understand me, to be free [...] those who really desire to understand, who are looking to find that which is eternal, without a beginning and without an end, will walk together with greater intensity, will be a danger to everything that is unessential, to unrealities, to shadows. And they will concentrate, they will become the flame, because they understand. Such a body we must create, and that is my purpose. Because of that true friendship – which you do not seem to know – there will be real co-operation on the part of each one. And this not because of authority, not because of salvation, but because you really understand, and hence are capable of living in the eternal. This is a greater thing than all pleasure, than all sacrifice."[128]
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 U. G. Krishnamurti described one of their meetings as follows: "We really didn't get along well. Whenever we met we locked horns over some issue or other. For instance, I never shared his concern for the world, or his belief that his teaching would profoundly affect the thoughts and actions of mankind for the next five hundred years – a fantasy of the Theosophist occultists. In one of our meetings I told Krishnamurti, "I am not called upon to save the world." He asked, "The house is on fire – what will you do?" "Pour more gasoline on it and maybe something will rise from the ashes", I remarked. Krishnamurti said, "You are absolutely impossible". Then I said, "You are still a Theosophist. You have never freed yourself from the World Teacher role. There is a story in the Avadhuta Gita which talks of the avadhut who stopped at a wayside inn and was asked by the innkeeper, 'What is your teaching?' He replied, 'There is no teacher, no teaching and no one taught.' And then he walked away. You too repeat these phrases and yet you are so concerned with preserving your teaching for posterity in its pristine purity."[169]
  6. 6.0 6.1 Krishnamurti, the flame of attention, p.107:
    "Goodness means a way of life which is righteousness, not in terms of religion, or morality or an ethical concept of righteousness, but in terms of one who sees that which is true and that which is false, and sustains that quality of sensitivity that sees it immediate and acts."
  7. Krishnamurti (1976)"The foundation for true meditation is that passive awareness which is the total freedom from authority and ambition, envy and fear. Meditation has no meaning, no significance whatsoever without this freedom [...] Thought is of knowledge and knowledge cannot free the mind of the fact. Meditation is the choiceless awareness of this complex, which empties the mind of the known."
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4
    Quoting Krishnamurti from tape-recording made on 7 February 1986:
    In the morning of 7 May 1986, K. answered a question from Mary Cadogan.Lutyens (1990), p. 159-160, Lutyens (2003), p. 205-206: "When Krishnaji dies what really happen with this extraordinary focus of understanding and energy that is K?"
    K: "'It is gone. If someone goes wholly into the teachings perhaps they might touch that; but one cannot try to touch it.' Then, after a moment, he added: 'If you all knew what you have missed – that vast emptiness.'"
    [...] Later that morning, a further response was recorded:
    "I was telling them this morning – for seventy years that super-energy – no – that immense energy, immense intelligence, has been using this body. I don’t think people realise what tremendous energy and intelligence went through this body – there’s twelve-cylinder engine. And for seventy years – was a pretty long time – and now the body can’t stand any more. Nobody, unless the body has been prepared, very carefully, protected and so on – nobody can understand what went through this body. Nobody. Don’t anybody pretend. Nobody. I repeat this: Nobody amongst us or the public, know what went on. I know they don’t.
    And now after seventy years it has come to an end. Not that that intelligence and energy – it’s somewhat here, every day, and especially at night. And after seventy years the body can’t stand it – can’t stand any more. It can’t. The Indians have a lot of damned superstitions about this – that you will and the body goes – and all that kind of nonsense. You won’t find another body like this, or that supreme intelligence operating in a body for many hundred years. You won’t see it again. When he goes, it goes. There is no consciousness left behind of that consciousness, of that state. They’ll all pretend or try to imagine they can get into touch with that. Perhaps they will somewhat if they live the teachings. But nobody has done it. Nobody. And so that’s that."
  9. According to occult and Theosophical lore, auras are invisible emanations related to each individual's so-called subtler planes of existence, as well as her or his normal plane. The ability to discern a person's aura is considered one of the possible effects of clairvoyance. Leadbeater's occult knowledge and abilities were highly respected within the Society.[23]
  10. The suffix –ji in Hindu names is a sign of affection or respect.
  11. Lutyens (1975), p. 40–63 (cumulative):
    The news regarding Krishnamurti and the World Teacher was not universally welcomed by Theosophists and led to upheavals in the Society; Lutyens (1983), p. 15–19, 40, 56. Part of the controversy was Leadbeater's role: He had a history of being frequently in the company of young boys—pupils under his spiritual and Theosophical instruction—and there was gossip of child abuse, although no accusations were ever proven.
  12. Lutyens (1975), "Chapter 10: Doubts and Difficulties" through "Chapter 15: In Love" pp. 80–132 [cumulative].
  13. Lutyens (1997), p. 46, 74–75, 126. Krishnamurti was named editor of The Herald of the Star, the official bulletin of the OSE. His position was mainly as a figurehead, yet he often wrote "editorial notes", which along with his other contributions helped the magazine's circulation; see, for example, Krishnamurti (1926).
  14. See Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography.
  15. Lutyens (1983), p. 170: "There was a man mending the road; the man was myself; the picaxe he held was myself; the very stone he was breaking up was a part of me."
  16. 16.0 16.1 Sloss (1993), p. 62 comments:
    "Krishna's experience [...] can bestow no authority to lead, only to share, and by sharing to offer others the hope of the sense of reality imparted."
    Krishnamurti himself said, in response to Rom Landau:
    "You are right. They live in the plains and I live, as you call it, on the mountaintop; but I hope that ever more and more human beings will be able to endure the clear air of the mountain top [...] How can you expect me to be concerned with what should be done or how it should be done? If you have once lived on a mountaintop, you cannot return to the plains. You can only try to make other people feel the purity of the air and enjoy the infinite prospect, and become one with the beauty of life there." Landau (1939), p. 287
  17. Lutyens (1975), p. 152–188, Chapter 18: The Turning Point through Chapter 21: Climax of the Process [cumulative]:
    The use of the term "going off" in the accounts of the early occurrences of 'the process' apparently signified so-called out-of-body experiences (Lutyens 1990, p. 134–135). In later use the meaning of "going off" was more nuanced.
  18. Some discussions with close associates are summarized or excerpted in Lutyens 1983, pp. 186, 224–231; Jayakar 1986, pp. 293, 364, 391–392, 409, 438–440; Zimbalist 2014, especially "Issue 29" forwards, contains numerous references; in such discussions, Krishnamurti is reputed to have often made tentative or ambiguous statements about his inner experiences and aspects of the otherness: "I don't know, and I don't ask" (Zimbalist (2014), "Issue 34". Template:Retrieved); reputedly he once said of his Notebook manuscript, "It's not my book. I didn't write it." (Zimbalist (2014), "Issue 31". Template:Retrieved); he believed that these experiences would stop once his physical condition deteriorated to the point where he could no longer travel and hold talks, and was mystified by the reputed continuing presence of the other, perceived while an invalid, days before his death (Zimbalist (2014), "Issue 89". Template:Retrieved).
  19. Krishnamurti (1972), p. 9: "I think we shall have incessant wrangles over the corpse of Krishnamurti if we discuss this or that, wondering who is now speaking. Someone asked me: 'Do tell me if it is you speaking or someone else'. I said: 'I really do not know and it does not matter'." From the 1927 "Question and answer session" at Ommen. (Note: weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website).
  20. Krishnamurti (1928a), p. 43: "I am going to be purposely vague, because although I could quite easily make it definite, it is not my intention to do so. Because once you define a thing it becomes dead." Krishnamurti on the World Teacher, from "Who brings the truth," an address delivered at Ommen 2 August 1927. (Note: weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti-related or Theosophical Society website. Link-specific content verified against original at New York Public Library Main Branch, "YAM p.v. 519" [call no..
  21. Lutyens considers the last remaining tie with Theosophy to have been severed in 1933, with the death of Besant. He had resigned from the Society in 1930.[93]
  22. Born in India in 1900 and of Brahmin descent, Rajagopal had moved in Krishnamurti's circle since early youth. Although regarded as an excellent editor and organizer, he was also known for his difficult personality and high-handed manner. Upon Nitya's death, he had promised Besant that he would look after Krishnamurti. See Henri Methorst, Krishnamurti A Spiritual Revolutionary, Edwin Publishing House, 2003, ch 12.
  23. Radha's account of the relationship, Lives in the Shadow With J. Krishnamurti, was first published in England by Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd. in 1991, and was soon followed by a rebuttal volume written by Mary Lutyens, Krishnamurti and the Rajagopals, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1996, in which she acknowledges the relationship but was never confirmed by Krishnamurti himself.
    Mark Lee: "I heard it from Erna Lillifelt, who learned it from Krishnaji. Krishnaji has told Mary Zimbalist and Erna Lilliefelt that there was something that Rajagopal had against him. They asked him what it was. And he said 'I had sexual relations with that woman'." See Padmanabhan (2015), p. ch. 8.
  24. The two also shared an interest in education: Krishnamurti helped to raise Radha, and the need to provide her with a suitable educational environment led to the founding of the Happy Valley School in 1946. The school has since re-established itself as an independent institution operating as the "Besant Hill School Of Happy Valley".. See Sloss (1991a).
  25. These included former freedom campaigners from the Indian Independence Movement, See Vernon (2001), p. 219
  26. Bohm would eventually serve as a Krishnamurti Foundation trustee.
  27. Their falling out was partly due to questions about Krishnamurti's private behaviour, especially his long and secret love affair with Rosalind Williams-Rajagopal, then unknown to the general public. After their falling out, Bohm criticised certain aspects of the teaching on philosophical, methodological, and psychological grounds. He also criticised what he described as Krishnamurti's occasional "verbal manipulations" when deflecting challenges. Eventually, he questioned some of the reasoning about the nature of thought and self, although he never abandoned his belief that "Krishnamurti was onto something". See Infinite Potential: The Life and times of David Bohm, by F. David Peat, Addison Wesley, 1997.
  28. D. Rajagopal was the head or co-head of a number of successive corporations and trusts, set up after the dissolution of the Order of the Star and chartered to publish Krishnamurti's talks, discussions and other writings.
  29. Formation of the Krishnamurti Foundation of America and the Lawsuits Which Took Place Between 1968 and 1986 to Recover Assets for Krishnamurti's Work, by Erna Lilliefelt, Krishnamurti Foundation of America, 1995. The complicated settlement dissolved the K & R Foundation (a previous entity), and transferred assets to the Krishnamurti Foundation of America (KFA). However certain disputed documents remained in the possession of Rajagopal, and he received partial repayment for his attorney's fees.
  30. Krishnamurti:
    “No thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was no image-making. He often attempted to think but no thought would come.”
  31. The foundation for true meditation is that passive awareness which is the total freedom from authority and ambition, envy and fear. Meditation has no meaning, no significance whatsoever without this freedom [...] Thought is of knowledge and knowledge cannot free the mind of the fact. Meditation is the choiceless awareness of this complex, which empties the mind of the known.[139]
  32. The Dalai Lama characterised Krishnamurti as a "great soul" (Jayakar 1986, p. 203). Krishnamurti very much enjoyed the Lama's company and by his own admission could not bring up his anti-guru views, mindful of the Lama's feelings.

Works[edit | edit source]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lutyens (1975), p. ch.18-21.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Vernon (2001), p. 124-128.
  3. Vernon (2001), p. 268.
  4. Vernon (2001), p. 68.
  5. Rodrigues, Hillary (January 1996). "J. Krishnamurti's 'religious mind'". Religious Studies and Theology. 15 (1): 40–55. ISSN 0829-2922.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Vas (2004), p. 26-29.
  7. Lutyens (1995), p. footnotes 1, 2.
  8. Williams (2004), p. 465.
  9. Lutyens (1975), p. 7.
  10. Lutyens (2003a).
  11. Lutyens (1975), p. 5.
  12. Williams (2004), p. 471–472.
  13. Lutyens (1975), p. 2–4.
  14. Lutyens (1975), p. 3–4, 22, 25.
  15. Lutyens (1983), p. 5, 309.
  16. Krishnamurti (2004), p. 16.
  17. Krishnamurti's Journal, 17 September 1973.
  18. Lutyens (1983), p. 7–8.
  19. Vernon (2001), p. 41.
  20. Williams (2004), p. 104.
  21. "Krishnamurti on eating meat & vegetarianism". Krishnamurti Australia. Archived from the original on 11 May 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Saxon, Wolfgang (18 February 1986). "Jiddu Krishnamurti, 90, is dead; religious philosopher from India". The New York Times (obituary). ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
  23. Lutyens (1975), p. 15, 20–21.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Lutyens (1975), p. 21.
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 Algeo, John (Autumn 1995). "Krishnamurti – love and freedom: Approaching a mystery by Peter Michel (1995) 205 pages". Quest Magazine (book review) – via theosophical.org.
  26. Jayakar (1986), p. 28.
  27. Krishnamurti's Journal, 15 September 1973.
  28. Jayakar (1986), p. xi.
  29. Vernon (2001), p. 51–72.
  30. Lutyens (1995).
  31. Lutyens (1975), p. 40.
  32. Lutyens (1975), p. 54–63, 64–71, 82, 84.
  33. Lutyens (1975), p. 3, 32.
  34. Lutyens (1975), p. 10-11, 93.
  35. Vernon (2001), p. 57.
  36. Lutyens (1975), p. "Chapter 4: First Initiation" and "Chapter 5: First Teaching" pp. 29–46 (cumulative).
  37. Lutyens (1997), p. 83, 120, 149.
  38. 38.0 38.1 Vernon (2001), p. 53.
  39. Vernon (2001), p. 52.
  40. Lutyens (1975), p. 50–51.
  41. Lutyens (1975), p. 51–52.
  42. Vernon (2001), p. 65.
  43. Lutyens (1975), p. 4, 75, 77.
  44. Lutyens (1975), p. 125.
  45. Lutyens (1975), p. 134–35, 171–17.
  46. Lutyens (1975), p. 114, 118, 131–132, 258.
  47. Nearing, H. (1992). Loving and Leaving the Good Life. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green. ISBN 978-0-9300-3154-1.
  48. Vernon (2001), p. 97.
  49. Lutyens (1975), p. 149, 199, 209, 216–217.
  50. Lutyens (1990), p. 35.
  51. Vernon (2001), p. 113.
  52. Lutyens (1983b), p. 6.
  53. Sloss (1993), p. 58.
  54. Lutyens (1983), p. 179-180.
  55. Jayakar (1986), p. 46–57.
  56. Sloss (1993), p. 62.
  57. Sloss (1993), p. 58, 61-62.
  58. 58.0 58.1 Vernon (2001), p. 282.
  59. Sloss (1993), p. 622.
  60. Lutyens (1983), p. 170.
  61. 61.0 61.1 61.2 Lutyens (1983), p. 171.
  62. Lutyens (1975), p. 158–160.
  63. Lutyens (1975), p. 165.
  64. Lutyens (1983), p. 178.
  65. 65.0 65.1 Lutyens (1988), p. 12.
  66. "J. Krishnamurti, Krishnamurti's Notebook, foreword by Mary Lutyens". Archived from the original on 27 September 2016. Retrieved 28 November 2017 – via jkrishnamurti.org.
  67. 67.0 67.1 Krishnamurti, J. (1976b). "Part 3 Gstaad, Switzerland 13th July to 3rd September 1961". Krishnamurti's Notebook. ISBN 978-1-888004-63-2. Archived from the original on 27 September 2016 – via J. Krishnamurti online (jkrishnamurti.org). Alt ISBN 1-888004-63-0.
  68. The Times (1986).
  69. Vernon (2001), p. 228.
  70. Vernon (2001), p. 227.
  71. Landau (1939), p. 286.
  72. Krishnamurti (1960), p. 34.
  73. Krishnamurti (1963), p. 27.
  74. Jayakar (1986), p. 133.
  75. Lutyens (1975), p. 163–4, 188–9.
  76. Lutyens (1975), p. 223.
  77. Lutyens (1990), p. 57–60.
  78. Lutyens (1975), p. 219.
  79. Lutyens (1975), p. 219, 221.
  80. 80.0 80.1 Jayakar (1986), p. 69.
  81. Vernon (2001), p. 152.
  82. Lutyens (1975), p. 220, 313 (note to p. 220).
  83. Lutyens (1975), p. 221.
  84. Lutyens (1983), p. 234.
  85. Lutyens (1975), p. 272.
  86. 86.0 86.1 Krishnamurti (1929).
  87. Lutyens, Mary (2005). J. Krishnamurti: A Life. Penguin Books. p. 279. ISBN 978-0-14-400006-7. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
  88. Lutyens (1997), p. 277–279.
  89. Vernon (2001), p. 166–167.
  90. Lutyens (1975), p. 262.
  91. Vernon (2001), p. 189.
  92. Lutyens (1975), p. 236.
  93. Lutyens (1975), pp. 276, 285.
  94. Schüller, Govert. "Krishnamurti and the world teacher project: Some Theosophical perceptions" (PDF). Theosophical History. Theosophical History Occasional Papers. V – via theosophyforward.com. After Annie Besant died in 1933 relations between Krishnamurti and the Theosophical Society were severed, although he would still have private contacts with individual members.
  95. Lutyens (1975), pp. 276–284.
  96. 96.0 96.1 Sloss (1991), p. ch. 12.
  97. Tworkov, Helen (1991). "The shadow side of Krishnamurti". TriCycle Magazine.
  98. Vernon (2001), p. 210.
  99. Jayakar (1986), p. 98.
  100. Lutyens (2003), p. 45-46.
  101. Lutyens (2003), p. 46, 47-48.
  102. Williams (2004), p. 260-261.
  103. 103.0 103.1 "Journal of the Krishnamurti Schools". Retrieved 4 June 2018.
  104. Vernon (2001), p. 209.
  105. Lutyens (2003), p. 59.
  106. Sloss (2011), p. 252.
  107. Lutyens (2003), pp. 87–88.
  108. Vernon (2001), pp. 199, 224–225.
  109. Template:Harvs. Template:Interp.
  110. Lutyens (1983b), p. 59-60.
  111. See Jayakar (1986), p. ch. 11 for Pupul Mehta's (later Jayakar) eyewitness account.
  112. Elliot Goldberg, The Path of Modern Yoga (Rochester VT: Inner Traditions 2016), p. 380.
  113. Fausset 1954; Weeraperuma 1998, pp. vii–viii.
  114. Sloss (1991), p. 297-298, 300-301.
  115. Sloss (1991), p. 301.
  116. Lutyens (2003a), p. 84-85.
  117. Lutyens (2003), p. 185.
  118. 118.0 118.1 Lutyens. Fulfilment (hardcover ed.). Farrar, Straus. p. 171, 233.—statement of Krishnamurti published in the Foundation Bulletin, 1970.
  119. "Jiddu Krishnamurti". meditativediaries.com. 17 February 2016. Archived from the original on 21 February 2016. Retrieved 18 February 2016.
  120. Jayakar (2000).
  121. Lutyens (2003), p. 26.
  122. Lutyens (2003), p. 226.
  123. See As The River Joins The Ocean: Reflections about J. Krishnamurti, by Giddu Narayan, Edwin House Publishing 1999, p 64.
  124. Vernon (2001), p. 248-249.
  125. Lutyens (1988), p. 3.
  126. 126.0 126.1 Lutyens (2003).
  127. Sloss (1991).
  128. "Truth is a pathless land". thekrishnamurti.blogspot.com.
  129. Lutyens (1990), p. 210.
  130. Lutyens (1983b), p. 119.
  131. Vernon (2001), p. 251.
  132. 132.0 132.1 132.2 Krishnamurti, J. (1980). "The core of the teachings". jkrishnamurti.org.
  133. Rodrigues, Hillary (January 1996). "J. Krishnamurti's 'religious mind'". Religious Studies and Theology. 15 (1): 40–55.
  134. Tubali, Shai (26 September 2023). "'We are inquiring together': The dialogical nature of Jiddu Krishnamurti's work". The Transformative Philosophical Dialogue. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures. Vol. 41. Springer, Cham. pp. 99–122. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40074-2_6. ISBN 978-3-031-40073-5. Retrieved 18 August 2025. Online ed. ISBN 978-3-031-40074-2
  135. 135.0 135.1 Vas (2004), p. 26.
  136. Vas (2004), p. 29.
  137. Vas (2004), p. 26-27.
  138. Vas (2004), p. 30.
  139. Krishnamurti (1976).
  140. 140.0 140.1 Jayakar (1986), p. 142.
  141. Vas (2004), p. 5.
  142. Weeraperuma (1998a).
  143. Vas (2004), p. 15.
  144. Landau (1939), p. 286-287.
  145. Landau (1939), p. 287.
  146. Lutyens (1990), p. 127-128.
  147. Lutyens (1983).
  148. See also "The Complete Teachings Project". Archived from the original on 2 February 2009.—an ambitious effort to collect the entire body of Krishnamurti's work into a coherently edited master reference.
  149. Alan Watts talking about Jiddu Krishnamurti: He was an extraordinary mystic. YouTube (video).
  150. Colet, Robert (August 1986). "Krishnamurti: The spiritual force behind Bruce Lee" (PDF). Inside Kung Fu. 13 (8): 73–75 – via jkrishnamurti.org.
  151. Terence Stamp speaking at the Krishnamurti Centre. YouTube (video). 27 August 2018.
  152. "Jackson Pollock (by L. Proyect)". columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 28 September 2020.
  153. "Remembering meditation teacher Toni Packer (1927–2013)". Lion's Roar (lionsroar.com). 24 August 2013.
  154. "Achyut Patwardhan". The Independent (obituary). London, UK. 23 October 2011. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  155. "Dada Dharmadhikari biography". mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org. Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  156. Horowitz, Scott (3 July 2018). "Derek Trucks talks new album, 2017 losses, & the new generation". Interview. L4LM (liveforlivemusic.com). Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  157. Through the eyes of Krishnamurti. YouTube (video). 13 February 2014.
  158. Moody, David Edmund (7 January 2013). The Unconditioned Mind: J. Krishnamurti and the Oak Grove School. Quest Books. ISBN 978-0-8356-3034-4.
  159. Vernon (2001), p. 205.
  160. Jayakar (1986), p. 340–343.
  161. "I am Unborn (Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj)", page 100, Chapter 45.
  162. Jayakar (1986), p. 144.
  163. Blutkeim, Aham Sphurana: Scintillations of Jnana from Sri Ramana Maharishi, page 408.
  164. See On Krishnamurti, by Raymond Martin, Wadsworth, 2003, for a discussion on Krishnamurti and the academic world.
  165. Krishnamurti, J.; Anderson, Alan W. (1991). A Wholly Different Way of Living. Hampshire, England: Krishnamurti Foundation Trust Ltd. ISBN 978-81-87326-14-4. Retrieved 14 April 2025.
  166. Anderson, Alan W. (2012). On Krishnamurti's Teachings. Ojai, California: Karina Library Press. ISBN 978-1-937902-00-1. Retrieved 14 April 2025.
  167. "Tube & Berger's "Imprint of Pleasure" – discover the sample source". Who Sampled? (whosampled.com). sample 427748. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
  168. "The Pathless Country". cinnamonpress.com. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
  169. Bhatt (1992).

Sources[edit | edit source]

Further reading[edit | edit source]

Serial biographies by Mary Lutyens

External links[edit | edit source]