Created by WikiJoy
Last edited March 28, 2026
m Removed empty portal template using script
Victorhcm (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|International organization of Southeast Asian countries}}
{{Short description|Association of Southeast Asian Nations}}
{{distinguish|South East Asia Cultural Organisation|Southeast Asia Treaty Organization}}
{{Use British English|date=March 2016}}
{{EngvarB}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates}}
{{Infobox geopolitical organisation
{{Infobox geopolitical organisation
| name                  = {{collapsible list
| conventional_long_name = Association of{{br}}Southeast Asian Nations
| titlestyle = background:transparent;text-align:center;line-height:normal;font-size:84%;
| native_name            = {{small|{{Name in various languages
| title = {{resize|1.25em|Association of Southeast Asian Nations}}
| name = {{nobold|''(in other national languages)''}}
| {{Infobox |subbox=yes |bodystyle=font-size:77%;font-weight:normal;
| fil   = Samahan ng mga Bansa sa Timog-silangang Asya
  | rowclass1 = mergedrow | label1 = [[Burmese language|Burmese]]: | data1 = {{lang|my|အရှေ့တောင်အာရှနိုင်ငံများအသင်း}}
| id     = Perhimpunan Bangsa-Bangsa Asia Tenggara
   | rowclass2 = mergedrow | label2 = [[Filipino language|Filipino]]: | data2 = {{lang|tl|Samahan ng mga Bansa sa Timog-silangang Asya}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Ang Saligang Batas ng ASEAN|trans-title=The ASEAN Charter|url=http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Philippines.pdf|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|access-date=10 January 2018|language=fil|archive-date=10 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110174642/http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Philippines.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| km    = សមាគមប្រជាជាតិអាស៊ីអាគ្នេយ៍
  | rowclass4 = mergedrow | label4 = [[Indonesian language|Indonesian]]: | data4 = {{lang|id|Perhimpunan Bangsa-bangsa Asia Tenggara}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Piagam Perhimpunan Bangsa-Bangsa Asia Tenggara|trans-title=The ASEAN Charter|url=http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Indonesia.pdf|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|access-date=10 January 2018|language=id|archive-date=15 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171215070010/http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Indonesia.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| lo    = ສະມາຄົມປະຊາຊາດແຫ່ງອາຊີຕະເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້
  | rowclass5 = mergedrow | label5 = [[Khmer language|Khmer]]: | data5 = {{lang|km|សមាគមប្រជាជាតិអាស៊ីអាគ្នេយ៍}}
| ms    = Persatuan Negara-negara Asia Tenggara
  | rowclass6 = mergedrow | label6 = [[Lao language|Lao]]: | data6 = {{lang|lo|ສະມາຄົມປະຊາຊາດແຫ່ງອາຊີຕະເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້}}
| my    = အရှေ့တောင်အာရှနိုင်ငံများအသင်း
  | rowclass7 = mergedrow | label7 = [[Malaysian Malay|Malay]]: | data7 = {{lang|ms|Persatuan Negara-negara Asia Tenggara}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Piagam Persatuan Negara Asia Tenggara|trans-title=The ASEAN Charter|url=http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Malaysia.pdf|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|access-date=10 January 2018|language=ms|archive-date=10 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110174728/http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Malaysia.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
| pt    = Associação das Nações do Sudeste Asiático
  | rowclass8 = mergedrow | label8 = [[Singaporean Mandarin|Mandarin]]: | data8 = {{lang|zh-sg|亚细安组织<br />东南亚国家联盟<br />東南亞國家協會}}
| ta    = தென்கிழக்காசிய நாடுகளின் கூட்டமைப்பு
  | rowclass9 = mergedrow | label9 = [[Tamil language|Tamil]]: | data9 = {{lang|ta|தென்கிழக்காசிய நாடுகளின் கூட்டமைப்பு}}
| tet   = Asosiasaun ba Nasaun Sudeste Aziátiku
   | rowclass10 = mergedrow | label10 = [[Thai language|Thai]]: | data10 = {{lang|th|สมาคมประชาชาติแห่งเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้}}
| th    = สมาคมประชาชาติแห่งเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
  | rowclass11 = mergedrow | label11 = [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]]: | data11= {{lang|vi|Hiệp hội các quốc gia Đông Nam Á}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Hiến chương của Hiệp hội các Quốc gia Đông Nam Á|trans-title=The ASEAN Charter|url=http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Vietnam.pdf|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|access-date=10 January 2018|language=vi|archive-date=10 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180110174732/http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/AC-Vietnam.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> }}
| vi    = Hiệp hội các quốc gia Đông Nam Á
}}
| zh-sg  = 亞細安組織<br />東南亞國家聯盟<br />東南亞國家協會
| linking_name          = the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
}}}}
| image_flag            = Flag of ASEAN.svg
| linking_name          = ASEAN
| image_flag            = ASEAN_Flag.svg
| alt_flag              = Ten yellow rice stalks on a red circle with a blue background
| flag_border            = yes
| image_symbol          = Seal of ASEAN.svg
| image_symbol          = Seal of ASEAN.svg
| symbol_type            = Emblem
| symbol_type            = Emblem
| other_symbol          =
| motto                  = {{br}}"One Vision, One Identity, One Community"<ref name="Overview" />
| other_symbol_type      =
| anthem                = "[[The ASEAN Way]]"{{Paragraph break}}{{Center|[[File:ASEAN Way Anthem 2023 ASEAN Summit Rendition.ogg]]}}
| motto                  = "One Vision, One Identity, One Community"<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Motto|url=http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/asean-motto|website=ASEAN.org|publisher=ASEAN|access-date=9 May 2015|archive-date=18 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150318053132/http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/asean-motto|url-status=live}}</ref>
| image_map              = [[File:Association of Southeast Asian Nations (orthographic projection).svg|upright=1.25|frameless]]
| anthem                = "[[The ASEAN Way]]"{{parabr}}{{center|[[File:The ASEAN Way (Instrumental).ogg]]}}
| map_caption            = Member states shown in dark green
| image_map              = Association of Southeast Asian Nations (orthographic projection).svg
| admin_center           = [[Jakarta]], Indonesia<ref>{{Cite web |title=ASEAN Centres & Facilities |url=http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-centres-facilities |website=ASEAN |publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations |access-date=16 September 2015 |archive-date=6 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906100841/http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-centres-facilities |url-status=live}}</ref>
| map_width              = 250px
| admin_center_type      = [[ASEAN Headquarters|Headquarters]]
| map_caption            = Member states shown in dark green.
| largest_city           = [[Jakarta]]<br />{{Coord|6|11.6962|S|106|49.3837|E|type:city}}
| admin_center_type      = Secretariat
| admin_center          = [[Jakarta]]{{efn|name="adress"}}
| coordinates            = {{Coord|6|14.3353|S|106|47.9554|E|type:city}}
| languages_type        = [[Working language]]
| languages_type        = [[Working language]]
| languages              = [[English language|English]]<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Charter|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|pages=29|url=http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf|quote='''Article 34.''' The working language of ASEAN is English.|access-date=29 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151109180154/http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf|archive-date=9 November 2015}}</ref>
| languages              = [[English language|English]]<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Charter|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|page=29|url=http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf|quote='''Article 34.''' The working language of ASEAN is English.|access-date=29 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151109180154/http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf|archive-date=9 November 2015}}</ref>
| languages2_type        = Official languages<br />of contracting states
| org_type              = [[Regional organization|Regional organisation]]
| languages2            = {{hlist|[[Burmese language|Burmese]]|[[Standard Mandarin|Chinese]]|[[English language|English]]|[[Filipino language|Filipino]]|[[Indonesian language|Indonesian]]|[[Khmer language|Khmer]]|[[Lao language|Lao]]|[[Malay language|Malay]]|[[Tamil language|Tamil]]|[[Thai language|Thai]]|[[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]]}}
| membership            = {{unbulleted list
| membership            = {{collapsible list
   | [[Member states of ASEAN|11 members]]
   | titlestyle = background: transparent; text-align: left; font-weight: normal;
   | {{BRN}}
  | title      = [[Member states of ASEAN|10 states]]
  | {{CAM}}
   | {{flag|Brunei}}
   | {{IDN}}
   | {{flag|Cambodia}}            
   | {{LAO}}
   | {{flag|Indonesia}}
   | {{MYS}}
   | {{flag|Laos}}
   | {{MYA}}
   | {{flag|Malaysia}}
   | {{PHL}}
   | {{flag|Myanmar}}
   | {{SGP}}
   | {{flag|Philippines}}
   | {{THA}}
   | {{flag|Singapore}}
   | {{TLS}}
   | {{flag|Thailand}}                
   | {{VNM}}
   | {{flag|Vietnam}}
}}
}}
{{Dividing line}}
| ethnic_groups          =
{{unbulleted list
| ethnic_groups_year    =  
  | [[Enlargement of ASEAN|1 observer]]
| leader_title1          = {{nowrap|[[Secretary-General of ASEAN|Secretary-General]]}}
  | {{PNG}}
| leader_name1          = [[Kao Kim Hourn]]
}}
| leader_title2          = Chairmanship of ASEAN
| demonym                = Southeast Asian
| leader_name2          = [[Indonesia]]
| government_type        = {{nowrap|[[Consensus decision-making|Consensus-driven]]}} on the principle of {{nowrap|[[Non-interventionism|non-interference]]}}
| established_event1    = {{nowrap|[[ASEAN Declaration|Bangkok Declaration]]}}
| leader_title1          = Chairman
| established_date1      = {{Start date and age|8 August 1967|df=y|p=y}}
| leader_name1          = {{flagdeco|Philippines}} [[Bongbong Marcos]]
| established_event2     = [[ASEAN Charter|Charter]]
| leader_title2          = {{nowrap|[[Secretary-General of ASEAN|Secretary-General]]}}
| established_date2     = {{Start date and age|16 December 2008|df=y|p=y}}
| leader_name2          = {{flagdeco|Cambodia}} [[Kao Kim Hourn]]
| area_km2              = 4,522,518<ref name="ASEAN-Indicators">{{cite web|title=Selected Basic ASEAN Indicators |url=http://www.asean.org/images/2015/January/selected_key_indicators/Summary%20table_as%20of%20December%202014_R.pdf |website=ASEAN.organisation |publisher=ASEANstats |access-date=9 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2015/January/selected_key_indicators/Summary%20table_as%20of%20December%202014_R.pdf |archive-date=4 September 2015 }}</ref>
| sovereignty_type      = Formation
| established_event1    = <span style=white-space:nowrap;>[[ASEAN Declaration]]</span>
| established_date1      = 8 August 1967
| established_event2    = [[ASEAN Free Trade Area|Free Trade Area]]
| established_date2      = 1 January 1993
| established_event3     = [[ASEAN Charter]]
| established_date3     = 16 December 2008
| established_event4    = <span style=white-space:nowrap;>[[ASEAN Integrated QR Code Payment System|QR Code Payment]]</span>
| established_date4      = {{circa|2020s}}
| area_km2              = 4,522,518
| area_sq_mi            = 1,712,602
| area_sq_mi            = 1,712,602
| area_footnote          = <ref name="ASEAN-Indicators">{{cite web |title=Selected Basic ASEAN Indicators |url=http://www.asean.org/images/2015/January/selected_key_indicators/Summary%20table_as%20of%20December%202014_R.pdf |website=ASEAN.organisation |publisher=ASEANstats |access-date=9 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2015/January/selected_key_indicators/Summary%20table_as%20of%20December%202014_R.pdf |archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref>
| percent_water          =  
| percent_water          =  
| population_estimate    = 667,393,019<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN"/>
| population_estimate    = 683,290,000<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN" />
| population_estimate_year = 2021
| population_estimate_year = 2023
| population_density_km2 = 144
| population_density_km2 = 144
| population_density_sq_mi = 373
| population_density_sq_mi = 373
| GDP_PPP                = {{increase}} $11.203 trillion<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN">{{Cite web|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/April/weo-report?c=516,522,536,544,548,518,566,576,578,582,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,LP,&sy=2021&ey=2028&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|access-date=2023-04-13|website=IMF|language=en}}</ref>
| GDP_PPP                = {{increase}} $13.152 trillion<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN">{{Cite web|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/April/weo-report?c=516,522,536,544,548,518,566,576,578,582,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,LP,&sy=2021&ey=2028&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1|access-date=2023-04-13|website=IMF}}</ref>
| GDP_PPP_year          = 2023
| GDP_PPP_year          = 2025
| GDP_PPP_per_capita    = {{increase}} $16,516<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN"/>
| GDP_PPP_per_capita    = {{increase}} $19,218<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN" />
| GDP_nominal            = {{increase}} $3.942 trillion<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN"/>
| GDP_nominal            = {{increase}} $4.167 trillion<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN" />
| GDP_nominal_year      = 2023
| GDP_nominal_year      = 2025
| GDP_nominal_per_capita = {{increase}} $5,812<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN"/>
| GDP_nominal_per_capita = {{increase}} $5,957<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN" />
| Gini_year              =  
| Gini_year              =  
| Gini_change            = <!--increase/decrease/steady-->
| Gini_change            = <!--increase/decrease/steady-->
| Gini                  = <!--number only-->
| Gini                  = <!--number only-->
| Gini_ref              =  
| Gini_ref              =  
| HDI_year              = 2021
| HDI_year              = 2023
| HDI_change            = increase <!--increase/decrease/steady-->
| HDI_change            = increase <!--increase/decrease/steady-->
| HDI                    = 0.726 <!--number only-->
| HDI                    = 0.745 <!--number only-->
| HDI_ref                = {{efn|Calculated as a mean estimate from the [[United Nations Development Programme|UNDP]] data of member states.}}
| HDI_ref                = {{efn|Calculated as a mean latest estimate from the [[United Nations Development Programme|UNDP]] data of member states. See also: [[List of ASEAN countries by HDI]]}}
| time_zone              =
| currency              = {{small|{{unbulleted list
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Brunei}} Brunei: [[Bruneian dollar|BND]] (B$)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Cambodia}} Cambodia: [[Cambodian riel|KHR]] (៛)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Indonesia}} Indonesia: [[Indonesian rupiah|IDR]] (Rp.)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Laos}} Laos: [[Lao kip|LAK]] (₭)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Malaysia}} Malaysia: [[Malaysian ringgit|MYR]] (RM)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Myanmar}} Myanmar: [[Myanmar kyat|MMK]] (K)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Philippines}} Philippines: [[Filipino peso|PHP]] (₱)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Singapore}} Singapore: [[Singapore dollar|SGD]] (S$)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Thailand}} Thailand: [[Thai baht|THB]] (฿)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Timor-Leste}} Timor-Leste: [[United States dollar|USD]] (US$)}}
| {{Nowrap|{{flagdeco|Vietnam}} Vietnam: [[Vietnamese dong|VND]] (₫)}}
}}}}
| currency_code          = <!-- don't use this -->
| time_zone              =  
| utc_offset            = [[UTC+06:30|+06:30]] to [[UTC+09:00|+09:00]]
| utc_offset            = [[UTC+06:30|+06:30]] to [[UTC+09:00|+09:00]]
| time_zone_DST          =
| DST_note              =
| utc_offset_DST        =
| official_website      = {{official URL}}
| official_website      = {{official URL}}
<!-- ORPHANED:
| footnote_c = If considered as a single entity.
| footnote_d = [http://www.asean.org/stat/Table1.pdf Selected key basic ASEAN indicators]
| footnote_e = [[Population growth|Annual growth]] 1.6%
-->| area_rank              =
| today                  =
}}
}}
'''ASEAN''' (pronounced as three [[Syllable|syllables]] A-SEA-AN),{{efn|{{IPAc-en|UK|ˈ|æ|s|i|æ|n}} {{Respell|ah|see|an}}, {{IPAc-en|US|ˈ|ɑː|s|i|ɑː|n|,_|ˈ|ɑː|z|i|-}} {{Respell|AH|see|ahn|,_|AH|zee-an}},<ref name="Pronounce">{{cite web|title=How do you say ASEAN?|url=https://pronounce.voanews.com/phrasedetail.php?name=ASEAN|website=Voice of America Pronunciation Guide|publisher=VOA|access-date=31 January 2020|archive-date=26 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726093607/https://pronounce.voanews.com/phrasedetail.php?name=ASEAN|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.loc.gov/nls/other/ABC.html |title=NLS/BPH: Other Writings, The ABC Book, A Pronunciation Guide |website=[[Library of Congress]] |access-date=12 January 2009| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090112114625/http://www.loc.gov/nls/other/ABC.html| archive-date= 12 January 2009 | url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[http://www.asean.org/2833.htm Asean.org] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302193843/http://www.asean.org/2833.htm }}, ASEAN-10: Meeting the Challenges, by Termsak Chalermpalanupap, [http://www.asean.org/ Asean.org] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511153413/http://www.asean.org/ }}, ASEAN Secretariat official website. Retrieved 27 June 2008.</ref>}} officially the '''Association of Southeast Asian Nations''',<ref name=Overview /> is a [[Political union|political]] and [[economic union]] of 10 member [[Sovereign state|states]] in [[Southeast Asia]]. The union has a total area of {{convert|4,522,518|km2|sqmi|abbr=on}} and an estimated total population of about 668{{nbsp}}million, containing approximately 8.5% of the world population in 2021{{Citation needed}}. ASEAN generated a [[purchasing power parity]] (PPP) [[gross domestic product]] (GDP) of around {{US$|10.2}}{{nbsp}}trillion in 2022, constituting approximately 6.5% of global [[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|GDP (PPP)]].<ref name="IMFWEOASEAN"/>


ASEAN's primary objectives are: "(1) to accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region and (2) to promote regional peace and stability through abiding respect for justice and the rule of law in the relationship among countries in the region and adherence to the principles of the [[Charter of the United Nations|United Nations Charter]]."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Overview - ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/fd/04_asean-generalin/04_asean-generalinfo.pdf}}</ref> With some of the fastest growing economies in the world, ASEAN has broadened its objectives beyond the economic and social spheres. In 2003, ASEAN moved along the path similar to the [[European Union]] (EU) by agreeing to establish an ASEAN community that consists of three pillars: the ASEAN Security Community, the ASEAN Economic Community, and the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community. The ten stalks of [[rice]] in the ASEAN flag and insignia represents the ten Southeast Asian countries bound together in solidarity.
The '''Association of Southeast Asian Nations''' ('''ASEAN''') is an [[International organization|intergovernmental forum]] of all [[Member states of ASEAN|11 states]] in [[Southeast Asia]].<ref name="cfr-asean">{{Cite web |last1=Hong |first1=Lynn |last2=Maizland |first2=Lindsay |last3=Galina |first3=Carlos |last4=Albert |first4=Eleanor |last5=Fong |first5=Clara |title=What Is ASEAN? |url=https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-asean |work=[[Council on Foreign Relations]] |access-date=26 October 2025 |language=en}}</ref> ASEAN primarily focuses on Southeast Asian [[economic development]], [[peaceful coexistence]] and adherence to [[Peremptory norm|international norms]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Overview ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/fd/04_asean-generalin/04_asean-generalinfo.pdf}}</ref> ASEAN operates on the principle of [[Consensus decision-making|consensus]] and respecting national [[sovereignty]], meaning that ASEAN as a whole cannot force another member state to change its domestic laws.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last=Yoshimatsu |first=Hidetaka |date=2023 |title=Meanings, norms, and social constitution: revisiting ASEAN centrality in East Asian regionalism |journal=Japanese Journal of Political Science|volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=409–423 |doi=10.1017/S1468109923000257 |issn=1468-1099|doi-access=free }}</ref>
 
ASEAN has population of more than 680 million people and a [[purchasing power parity]]-adjusted [[gross domestic product]] (GDP) of around 6.3% [[Gross world product|global GDP]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Southeast Asia - GDP based on PPP, share of world |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/SEQ |access-date=2026-03-28 |website=International Monetary Fund}}</ref> ASEAN member states represent a diverse set of economies: the [[least developed countries]] like [[Laos]], to [[emerging economies]] like [[Vietnam]], to [[developed economy|developed economies]] like [[Singapore]]. Many Southeast Asian projects have originated from decentralized initiatives between member states, such as the [[ASEAN Power Grid]], [[ASEAN Free Trade Area]], [[ASEAN Integrated QR Code Payment System]], or the [[Visa policy of ASEAN members|mutual ASEAN visa-free policies]]. Every two years, it organizes a sporting event to promote cultural exchange known as [[SEA Games]].
 
ASEAN has strong ties with [[East Asia|East Asian]] and [[South Asia|South Asian]] countries. It have vested interest in the security of the [[South China Sea]] and the greater [[Indo-Pacific]] region.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Joint Statement by the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus (ADMM-PLUS) |url=https://www.mindef.gov.sg/news-and-events/latest-releases/1nov25-fs/ |access-date=2026-03-28 |website=Ministry of Defence |language=en}}</ref> In terms of [[diplomacy]], ASEAN operates on a principle of centrality, meaning that all concerns from other countries or organizations about Southeast Asia should be routed to ASEAN instead of individual states.<ref name=":3" /> All Southeast Asian countries, many [[Great power|great powers]], and international organizations have [[List of diplomatic missions in Indonesia#Missions to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)|dedicated diplomatic presence near ASEAN headquarters in Jakarta]].


ASEAN regularly engages other countries in the [[Asia-Pacific]] region and beyond. A major partner of the [[United Nations|UN]], [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation|SCO]], [[Pacific Alliance|PA]], [[Gulf Cooperation Council|GCC]], [[Mercosur|MERCOSUR]], [[Community of Latin American and Caribbean States|CELAC]], and [[Economic Cooperation Organization|ECO]],<ref>{{cite web |url=https://asean.org/our-communities/asean-political-security-community/outward-looking-community/external-relations/international-regional-organisation/ |title=International/Regional Organisation |website=ASEAN}}</ref> ASEAN maintains a global network of alliances and dialogue partners and is considered by many to be a global powerhouse,<ref name="aseanvisa">{{cite web|url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/asean-one-visa-travel-destination/|title=This is why ASEAN needs a common visa|website=World Economic Forum|access-date=18 March 2018|archive-date=25 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190625002815/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/asean-one-visa-travel-destination/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="aseanblock">{{cite web|url=https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/asean-bloc-must-be-tapped/news-story/59d00e4f65a6084f4be157ee95da3534|title=ASEAN bloc must be tapped|website=www.theaustralian.com.au|access-date=18 March 2018|archive-date=24 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200424002421/https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/asean-bloc-must-be-tapped/news-story/59d00e4f65a6084f4be157ee95da3534|url-status=live}}</ref> the central forum for cooperation in [[Asia-Pacific]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) |url=http://ustr.gov/issue-areas/trade-organizations/asia-pacific-economic-cooperation-apec |access-date=2023-05-21 |website=United States Trade Representative |language=en}}</ref> It is involved in numerous international affairs, and hosts diplomatic missions throughout the world.<ref name="ASEANTreaties">{{cite news|url=http://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/association-southeast-asian-nations-asean/|title=Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) {{!}} Treaties & Regimes {{!}} NTI|newspaper=The Nuclear Threat Initiative|access-date=3 March 2018|archive-date=13 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190413082230/https://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/association-southeast-asian-nations-asean/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="aseanUN">{{cite web|url=http://www.unaprcm.org/asean-un-partnership|title=ASEAN-UN Partnership|website=Asia-Pacific Regional Coordination Mechanism|access-date=7 December 2017|archive-date=12 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181012012749/http://www.unaprcm.org/asean-un-partnership|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="aseanoverview">{{cite web|url=http://asean.org/?static_post=background-overview-united-nations|title=An Overview of ASEAN-United Nations Cooperation - ASEAN - ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY|access-date=28 April 2017|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053140/https://asean.org/?static_post=background-overview-united-nations|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="UNgovorgs">{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/en/sections/member-states/intergovernmental-organizations/index.html|title=Intergovernmental Organizations|website=www.un.org|access-date=28 April 2017|archive-date=23 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170523053652/http://www.un.org/en/sections/member-states/intergovernmental-organizations/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The organization's success has become the driving force of some of the largest trade blocs in history, including [[Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation|APEC]] and [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership|RCEP]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/a-trade-pact-nearly-10-years-in-the-making-5-things-to-know-about-rcep | title=A trade pact nearly 10 years in the making: 5 things to know about RCEP &#124; the Straits Times | date=15 November 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Trade/India-stays-away-from-RCEP-talks-in-Bali | title=India stays away from RCEP talks in Bali }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.pecc.org/resources/doc_view/601-back-to-canberra-founding-apec | title=PECC - Back to Canberra: Founding APEC }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-asean | title=What is ASEAN? }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://harvardpolitics.com/asean-beats-the-odds/ | title=Beating the Odds: How ASEAN Helped Southeast Asia Succeed | date=15 March 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/asean-an-unexpected-success-story/ | title=ASEAN: An Unexpected Success Story | date=16 May 2018 }}</ref>
The roots of ASEAN came from the [[ASEAN Declaration]] signed by five Southeast Asian countries in 1967. Originally, ASEAN was founded to [[Containment|contain communism]],<ref name="cfr-asean" /> but gradually ASEAN was reoriented to focus on economic development and prevent foreign interference in Southeast Asia as a whole. As ASEAN expanded and admitted other countries, the member states eventually signed a binding [[ASEAN Charter]] in 2008. As of 2026, ASEAN are currently dealing with many threats, such as the worsening [[Myanmar civil war (2021–present)|civil war in Myanmar]], [[territorial disputes in the South China Sea]] and managing [[China–United States relations|U.S.–China tensions]]. Nevertheless, it is widely considered to be a successful example of regional collaboration, and its emphasis on [[De facto standard|''de facto'' standards]] is seen as an opposite to the legal nature of the [[European Union]].<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://aei.pitt.edu/47667/1/WP15%2DThe%2DEU%2Dand%2DASEAN.pdf |title=The EU and ASEAN – In Search of a New Regional Paradigm? EU Centre Singapore Working Paper No. 15, August 2013 |last=Hwee |first=Yeo Lay |date=2013}}</ref>
[[File:ASEAN HQ 1.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|The Secretariat of ASEAN in [[Jakarta]]]]
{{TOC limit}}
{{TOC limit}}


==History==
==History==
{{Main|History of ASEAN}}


=== Founding ===
===Background===
{{main|ASEAN Declaration|ASEAN Charter}}
{{Further info|History of Southeast Asia}}
Besides their close geographic proximity, political scholars consider [[Southeast Asia]]n nations "cultural crossroads" between [[East Asia]] and [[South Asia]], located at critical junctions of the [[South China Sea]] as well as the [[Indian Ocean]], and as a result received a great deal of [[Arabic|Islamic]] and [[Persians|Persian]] influence prior to the [[Europe]]an colonial ages.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Reid |first=Anthony |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2TRPCAAAQBAJ&dq=history+of+southeast+asia&pg=PA13 |title=A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads |date=2015-03-03 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-51293-7 |page=13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Muhammad Ismail Marcinkowski |title=Persian Religious and Cultural Influences in Siam/Thailand and Maritime Southeast Asia in Historical Perspective: A Plea for a Concerted Interdisciplinary Approach |url=https://thesiamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2000/03/JSS_088_0q_Marcinkowski_PersianReligiousCulturalInfluences.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200718124016/https://thesiamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2000/03/JSS_088_0q_Marcinkowski_PersianReligiousCulturalInfluences.pdf |archive-date=18 July 2020 |access-date=28 July 2022 |website=Thesiamsociety.org}}</ref>


ASEAN was preceded by an organisation formed on 31 July 1961 called the '''Association of Southeast Asia''' ('''ASA'''), a group consisting of [[Thailand]], the [[Philippines]], and the [[Federation of Malaya]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Tarling |first1=Nicholas |title=The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: Volume 2, Part 2, From World War II to the Present |year=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-66372-4 |page=287 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U0trzUvic-8C&pg=PA287 |access-date=7 January 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Ooi |first1=Keat Gin |title=Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor |year=2004 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-57607-770-2 |page=186 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC&pg=PA186 |access-date=7 January 2021 |language=en}}</ref> ASEAN itself was created on 8 August 1967, when the [[foreign minister]]s of five countries:
Since around 100 BCE, the Southeast Asian archipelago occupied a central position at the crossroads of the [[Indian Ocean]] and the [[South China Sea]] trading routes, which stimulated the economy and the influx of ideas.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Reid |first1=Anthony |title=An 'Age of Commerce' in Southeast Asian History |journal=Modern Asian Studies |date=February 1990 |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=1–30 |doi=10.1017/S0026749X00001153 }}</ref> This included the introduction of [[Abugida|abugida scripts]] to Southeast Asia as well as the [[Chữ Nôm|Chinese script]] to [[Literary Chinese in Vietnam|Vietnam]]. Besides various indigenous scripts, various abugida [[Brahmic scripts]] were widespread in both continental and insular Southeast Asia. Historically, scripts such as [[Pallava script|Pallava]], [[Kawi script|Kawi]] (from ancient [[Sanskrit language|Sanskrit]] script) and [[Rencong script|Rencong]] or ''Surat Ulu'' were used to write [[Old Malay]], until they were replaced by [[Jawi script|Jawi]] during [[Islam]]ic [[missionary]] missions in the [[Malay Archipelago]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Fadeli |first=Muhammad Al-Amin Mohd |title=Malay History & Culture |date=2019 |display-authors=etal |via=Academia}}</ref>
[[Indonesia]], [[Malaysia]], the [[Philippines]], [[Singapore]], and [[Thailand]], signed the [[ASEAN Declaration]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Liow |first1=Joseph |last2=Leifer |first2=Michael |title=Dictionary of the Modern Politics of Southeast Asia |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-62233-8 |pages=82–85 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=G5KLBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA82 |access-date=7 January 2021 |language=en}}</ref> As set out in the Declaration, the aims and purposes of ASEAN are to accelerate economic growth, social progress, and cultural development in the region, to promote regional peace, collaboration and mutual assistance on matters of common interest, to provide assistance to each other in the form of training and research facilities, to collaborate for better utilization of agriculture and industry to raise the living standards of the people, to promote [[Southeast Asian studies]] and to maintain close, beneficial co-operation with existing international organisations with similar aims and purposes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/news/item/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration|title=The Asean Declaration (Bangkok Declaration) Bangkok, 8 August 1967|publisher=ASEAN|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150211121705/http://www.asean.org/news/item/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration|archive-date=11 February 2015|access-date=17 June 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview|title=Overview|website=asean.org|publisher=ASEAN|access-date=7 February 2015|archive-date=17 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150217005044/http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview|url-status=live}}</ref>


The creation of ASEAN was initially motivated by the desire to contain [[anti-communism|communism]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=What Is ASEAN? |url=https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-asean |access-date=2023-05-22 |website=Council on Foreign Relations |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Historical Overview of ASEAN |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=jfadt/asean/aseanch1.pdf}}</ref> Communism had taken a foothold in mainland Asia with the [[Soviet Union]] occupation of the [[North Korea|northern Korean]] peninsula after [[World War II]], establishing communist governments in [[North Korea]] (1945), [[China|People's Republic of China]] (1949) and portions of former [[French Indochina]] with [[North Vietnam]] (1954), accompanied by the communist insurgency "Emergency" in [[British Malaya]] and unrest in the recently independent [[Philippines]] from the U S. in the early 1950s.
[[European colonial]]ism influenced most ASEAN countries, including [[French Indochina]] (present-day [[Vietnam]], [[Laos]] and [[Cambodia]]), [[British rule in Burma|British Burma]], [[British Malaya|Malaya]] and [[British Borneo|Borneo]] (present-day [[Myanmar]], [[Malaysia]] and [[Singapore]], and [[Brunei]]), [[Dutch East Indies]] (present day [[Indonesia]]), [[Spanish East Indies]] (present-day [[Philippines]] and various other colonies), and [[Portuguese Timor]] (present-day [[Timor-Leste]]), with only [[Thailand]] (then [[Siam]]) not formed from a prior European colony.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Acharya |first=Amitav |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1355/9789814311250/html |title=The Making of Southeast Asia |date=2012-11-22 |publisher=ISEAS Publishing |isbn=978-981-4311-25-0 |doi=10.1355/9789814311250}}</ref> Siam served as the buffer state, sandwiched between British Burma and French Indochina, but its kings had to contend with [[Bowring Treaty|unequal treaties]] as well as British and French political interference and territorial losses after the [[Franco-Siamese conflict of 1893]] and the [[Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909]].<ref>{{Cite journal |date=1909 |title=Treaty between Great Britain and Siam |journal=The American Journal of International Law |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=297–304 |doi=10.2307/2212641 |issn=0002-9300 |jstor=2212641 |s2cid=246007886}}</ref> Under European colonisation, Southeast Asian nations were introduced to European religions and technologies, as well as the [[Latin alphabet]].


These events also encouraged the earlier formation of SEATO ([[South East Asia Treaty Organization]]) led by the [[United States]] and [[United Kingdom]] along with [[Australia]] with several Southeast Asian partners in 1954 as a "containment" extension and an eastern version of the early defensive bulwark [[NATO]] in western [[Europe]] of 1949.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Asia-Pacific Profile |author1=Bernard Eccleston |author2=Michael Dawson |author3=Deborah J. McNamara |year=1998 |publisher=Routledge (UK) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l07ak-yd6DAC&q=%22Bangkok+Declaration%22+ASEAN&pg=RA1-PA311 |isbn=978-0-415-17279-0 |access-date=3 June 2020 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053135/https://books.google.com/books?id=l07ak-yd6DAC&pg=RA1-PA311&lpg=RA1-PA311&dq=%22Bangkok+Declaration%22+ASEAN |url-status=live }}</ref> However, the local member states of ASEAN group achieved greater cohesion in the mid-1970s following a change in the balance of power after the fall of Saigon and the end of the [[Vietnam War]] in April 1975 and the decline of SEATO.
The [[Empire of Japan]], in the vein of the [[Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere]] concept, sought to unite and create a pan-Asian identity against [[Western imperialism in Asia|Western colonial occupation]], but Japan's alliance with the [[Axis powers]] in [[World War II]] soured relations between many colonies of Europe and the United States.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hirai |first=L. Stuart |date=2022-12-07 |title=How the US and Japan Went From Enemies to Allies After WWII |url=https://www.history.com/articles/post-wwii-us-japan-occupation-allies |access-date=2025-10-29 |website=HISTORY |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations - Office of the Historian |url=https://history.state.gov/milestones/1937-1945/pearl-harbor |access-date=2025-10-29 |website=history.state.gov}}</ref> Defeat of Imperial Japan eventuated in [[Decolonization of Asia|decolonisation movements]] throughout Southeast Asia, resulting in the independent ASEAN states seen today.


ASEAN's first summit meeting, held in [[Bali]], [[Indonesia]] in 1976, resulted in an agreement on several industrial projects and the signing of a [[Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia|Treaty of Amity and Cooperation]], and a Declaration of Concord. The end of the [[Cold War]] allowed ASEAN countries to exercise greater political independence in the region, and in the 1990s, ASEAN emerged as a leading voice on [[regional trade]] and security issues.<ref>Moon, C. (2014). ASEAN. Encyclopædia Britannica</ref>
===Formation===
{{main|ASEAN Declaration|}}


On 15 December 1995, the [[Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty]] was signed to turn Southeast Asia into a [[nuclear-weapon-free zone]]. The treaty took effect on 28 March 1997 after all but one of the member states had ratified it. It became fully effective on 21 June 2001 after the Philippines ratified it, effectively banning all nuclear weapons in the region.<ref name="NWFZ">[http://disarmament.un.org/TreatyStatus.nsf/Bangkok%20Treaty%20(in%20alphabetical%20order)?OpenView Bangkok Treaty (in alphabetical order) At UNODA] United Nations. Retrieved 4 September 2008. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728143121/http://disarmament.un.org/TreatyStatus.nsf/Bangkok%20Treaty%20%28in%20alphabetical%20order%29?OpenView}}</ref>
{{Multiple image
| align            = left
| direction        = vertical
| image1            = Asean Declaration On 8 August 1967.webm
| alt1              =
| caption1          = A newsreel documenting the signing ceremony of the [[ASEAN Declaration]] on 8 August 1967 ([[ASEAN Day]])
| image2            = ST 20170326 STKISHOREBOOKOA4Q 3027316-2-640x480.jpg
| alt2              =
| caption2          = Signing of the ASEAN Declaration by the five Foreign Ministers at [[Saranrom Palace]] in Bangkok
}}


=== Expansion ===
The predecessor of ASEAN was the [[Association of Southeast Asia]] (ASA), formed on 31 July 1961 and consisting of [[Thailand]], the [[Philippines]], and [[Federation of Malaya|Malaya]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Tarling |first1=Nicholas |title=The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: Volume 2, Part 2, From World War II to the Present |year=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-66372-4 |page=287 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U0trzUvic-8C&pg=PA287 |access-date=7 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Ooi |first1=Keat Gin |title=Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor |year=2004 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-57607-770-2 |page=186 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC&pg=PA186 |access-date=7 January 2021}}</ref> ASEAN itself was created on 8 August 1967, when the [[foreign minister]]s of five countries - [[Indonesia]], [[Malaysia]], the [[Philippines]], [[Singapore]], and [[Thailand]] - signed the [[ASEAN Declaration]] at [[Saranrom Palace]] in [[Bangkok]], negotiated in [[Lam Thaen Guest House]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Liow |first1=Joseph |last2=Leifer |first2=Michael |title=Dictionary of the Modern Politics of Southeast Asia |date=20 November 2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-62233-8 |pages=82–85 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=G5KLBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA82 |access-date=7 January 2021}}</ref> According to the Declaration, ASEAN aims to accelerate economic, social, and cultural development in the region, as well as promoting regional peace, to collaborate on matters of shared interest, and to promote [[Southeast Asian studies]] and maintain close cooperation with existing international organisations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/news/item/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration|title=The Asean Declaration (Bangkok Declaration) Bangkok, 8 August 1967|publisher=ASEAN|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150211121705/http://www.asean.org/news/item/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration|archive-date=11 February 2015|access-date=17 June 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://asean.org/what-we-do|title=What We Do|work=ASEAN|access-date=26 October 2025|archive-date=16 May 2025|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250516114321/https://asean.org/web/20250516114321/https://asean.org/what-we-do|url-status=live}}</ref>
On 7 January 1984, [[Brunei]] became ASEAN's sixth member<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2700.htm|title=Background Note:Brunei Darussalam/Profile:/Foreign Relations|publisher=US State Department|access-date=6 March 2007|archive-date=4 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190604183451/https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2700.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> and on 28 July 1995, following the end of the [[Cold War]], [[Vietnam]] joined as the seventh member.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/10098.htm|title=Vietnam in ASEAN: Toward Cooperation for Mutual Benefits|year=2007|work=ASEAN Secretariat|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511153326/http://www.asean.org/10098.htm|archive-date=11 May 2011|access-date=28 August 2009}}</ref> [[Laos]] and [[Myanmar]] (formerly Burma) joined two years later on 23 July 1997.<ref name="enlargement">{{cite book|title=ASEAN Enlargement: impacts and implications|author1=Carolyn L. Gates|author2=Mya Than|publisher=Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|year=2001|isbn=978-981-230-081-2}}</ref> [[Cambodia]] was to join at the same time as [[Laos]] and [[Myanmar]], but a [[1997 Cambodian coup|coup in 1997]] and other internal instability delayed its entry.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Diplomatic pragmatism: ASEAN's response to the July 1997 coup {{!}} Conciliation Resources|url=https://www.c-r.org/accord/cambodia/diplomatic-pragmatism-aseans-response-july-1997-coup|access-date=2021-02-27|website=www.c-r.org}}</ref> It then joined on 30 April 1999 following the stabilization of its government.<ref name="enlargement" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/3338.htm|title=Statement by the Secretary-General of ASEAN Welcoming the Kingdom of Cambodia as the Tenth Member State of ASEAN: 30 April 1999, ASEAN Secretariat|year=2008|work=ASEAN Secretariat|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511153639/http://www.asean.org/3338.htm|archive-date=11 May 2011|access-date=28 August 2009}}</ref>


In 2006, ASEAN was given [[United Nations General Assembly observers|observer status at the United Nations General Assembly]].<ref>[http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/news/view_article.php?article_id=28822 RP resolution for observer status in UN assembly OK'd], Philippine Daily Inquirer, 13 March 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100826051047/http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/news/view_article.php?article_id=28822 }}</ref> In response, the organisation awarded the status of "dialogue partner" to the UN.<ref>{{cite news |title=Philippines to Represent ASEAN in UN Meetings in NY, Geneva |url=http://asia.news.yahoo.com/070307/4/2ykdn.html |work=Yahoo! News |access-date=13 March 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070312113724/http://asia.news.yahoo.com/070307/4/2ykdn.html |archive-date=12 March 2007 }}</ref>
The creation of ASEAN was initially motivated by [[anti-communism|the desire to contain communism]],<ref name="cfr-asean" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Historical Overview of ASEAN |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=jfadt/asean/aseanch1.pdf}}</ref> which took a foothold in mainland Asia after [[World War II]], with the formation of communist governments in [[North Korea]], [[China]], and [[North Vietnam|Vietnam]], accompanied by the so-called communist "emergency" in [[British Malaya]], and unrest in the recently decolonised [[Philippines]].


=== Commonality===
These events also encouraged the earlier formation of the [[South East Asia Treaty Organization]] (SEATO), led by the [[United States]], [[United Kingdom]], and [[Australia]], with several Southeast Asian partners in 1954 as an extension of "containment" policy, seeking to create an Eastern version of [[NATO]].<ref>{{cite book |title=The Asia-Pacific Profile |author1=Bernard Eccleston |author2=Michael Dawson |author3=Deborah J. McNamara |year=1998 |publisher=Routledge (UK) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l07ak-yd6DAC&q=%22Bangkok+Declaration%22+ASEAN&pg=RA1-PA311 |isbn=978-0-415-17279-0 |access-date=3 June 2020 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053135/https://books.google.com/books?id=l07ak-yd6DAC&pg=RA1-PA311&lpg=RA1-PA311&dq=%22Bangkok+Declaration%22+ASEAN |url-status=live }}</ref> However, the local member states of ASEAN group achieved greater cohesion in the mid-1970s following a change in the balance of power after the [[Fall of Saigon]] and the end of the [[Vietnam War]] in April 1975 and the decline of SEATO.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Beeson |first=Mark |title=Institutions of the Asia–Pacific: ASEAN, APEC, and beyond |date=2009 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-46504-5 |series=Global institutions series |location=London |page=65|quote=Despite the previously discussed potential limitations of the ASEAN way and its preference for voluntarism and consensus, it was felt that this form of multilateralism had more chance of success than some of its institutional predecessors like SEATO, which was unable to demonstrate "either a viable political purpose or a military function."}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=The ASEAN: Thirty years and beyond |date=1997 |isbn=978-971-15-0360-4 |editor-last=Aranal-Sereno |editor-first=Maria Lourdes |location=Quezon City |pages=271, 460 |quote=Regional cooperation flourished when the smaller countries took the leadership in developing such organizations as ASEAN ... As the US forces moved on to strategic weakness and disengagement, heightened insecurity caught up with Southeast Asian countries and, ironically, gave ASEAN a sense of being. |editor-last2=Santiago |editor-first2=Joseph Sedfrey}}</ref>
{{Main articles|History of Southeast Asia}}
[[File:ASEAN_Press_Briefing_on_Kampuchea_Conference.jpg|thumb|Singapore's [[Tommy Koh]] (middle) leads the ASEAN Coalition at a UN press conference during the [[Cambodian–Vietnamese War]], 20 July 1981.]]
Besides their close geographic proximity, political scholars consider [[Southeast Asia]]n nations a cultural crossroads between [[East Asia]] and [[South Asia]], located at critical junctions of the [[South China Sea]] as well as the [[Indian Ocean]], and as a result received much influence from [[Arabic|Islamic]] and [[Persians|Persian]] influences prior to the [[Europe]]an colonial ages.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Reid |first=Anthony |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2TRPCAAAQBAJ&dq=history+of+southeast+asia&pg=PA13 |title=A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-51293-7|page=13 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://thesiamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2000/03/JSS_088_0q_Marcinkowski_PersianReligiousCulturalInfluences.pdf|author=Muhammad Ismail Marcinkowski|title=Persian Religious and Cultural Influences in Siam/Thailand and Maritime Southeast Asia in Historical Perspective: A Plea for a Concerted Interdisciplinary Approach|website=Thesiamsociety.org|access-date=28 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200718124016/https://thesiamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2000/03/JSS_088_0q_Marcinkowski_PersianReligiousCulturalInfluences.pdf|archive-date=18 July 2020|url-status=live}}</ref>
ASEAN's first summit meeting, held in [[Bali]], Indonesia, in 1976, resulted in an agreement on several industrial projects and the signing of a [[Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia|Treaty of Amity and Cooperation]], and a Declaration of Concord. The end of the [[Cold War]] allowed ASEAN countries to exercise greater political independence in the region, and in the 1990s, ASEAN emerged as a leading voice on [[regional trade]] and security issues.<ref>Moon, C. (2014). ASEAN. Encyclopædia Britannica</ref>
[[File:On 28 January 1992, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Free Trade Area or AFTA Agreement was signed in Singapore.jpg|thumb|Members pose after the Signing of the [[ASEAN Free Trade Area]] (AFTA) in Singapore, 28 January 1992]]


Since around 100 BCE, the Southeast Asian archipelago occupied a central position at the crossroads of the [[Indian Ocean]] and the [[South China Sea]] trading routes, which stimulated the economy and the influx of ideas.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Reid |first=Anthony |title=An 'Age of Commerce' in Southeast Asian History |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/abs/an-age-of-commerce-in-southeast-asian-history/E09ED31B7CDB61464CA851C688C83A28 |journal=Modern Asian Studies |language=en |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=1–30 |doi=10.1017/S0026749X00001153 |s2cid=128602618 |issn=1469-8099}}</ref> This included the introduction of [[Abugida|abugida scripts]] to Southeast Asia as well as the [[Chinese scripts|Chinese script]] to [[Literary Chinese in Vietnam|Vietnam]]. Besides various indigenous scripts, various abugida [[Brahmic scripts]] were widespread in Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, Malay etc. Historically, scripts such as [[Pallava script|Pallava]], [[Kawi script|Kawi]] (from ancient [[Tamil language|Tamil]] script) and [[Rencong script|Rencong]] or [[Surat Ulu script|Surat Ulu]] were used to write [[Old Malay]], until they were replaced by [[Jawi script|Jawi]] during [[Islam]]ic [[missionary]] missions in the [[Malay Archipelago]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Fadeli |first=Muhammad Al-Amin Mohd |display-authors=etal |title=Malay History & Culture |via=Academia}}</ref>
On 15 December 1995, the [[Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty]] was signed to turn Southeast Asia into a [[nuclear-weapon-free zone]]. The treaty took effect on 28 March 1997 after all but one of the member states had ratified it. It became fully effective on 21 June 2001 after the Philippines ratified it, effectively banning all nuclear weapons in the region.<ref name="NWFZ">[http://disarmament.un.org/TreatyStatus.nsf/Bangkok%20Treaty%20(in%20alphabetical%20order)?OpenView Bangkok Treaty (in alphabetical order) At UNODA] United Nations. Retrieved 4 September 2008. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728143121/http://disarmament.un.org/TreatyStatus.nsf/Bangkok%20Treaty%20%28in%20alphabetical%20order%29?OpenView|date=28 July 2011}}</ref>


Historical [[European colonial]] influence to various ASEAN countries, including [[French Indochina]] (present-day [[Vietnam]], [[Laos]] & [[Cambodia]]), [[British rule in Burma|British Burma]], [[British Malaya|Malaya]] and [[British Borneo|Borneo]]  (present-day [[Myanmar]], [[Malaysia]] & [[Singapore]], and [[Borneo]]), [[Dutch East Indies]] (present day [[Indonesia]]), [[Spanish East Indies]] (present-day [[Philippines]] and various other colonies), and [[Portuguese Timor]] (present-day [[East Timor|Timor-Leste]]) influenced all Southeast Asian countries, with only [[Thailand]] (then [[Siam]]) being the only Southeast Asian country not formed from a prior European colony.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Acharya |first=Amitav |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1355/9789814311250/html |title=The Making of Southeast Asia |publisher=ISEAS Publishing |isbn=978-981-4311-25-0 |language=en |doi=10.1355/9789814311250}}</ref> [[Thailand|Siam]] served as a convenient buffer state, sandwiched between [[British rule in Burma|British Burma]] and [[French Indochina]], but its kings had to contend with [[Bowring Treaty|unequal treaties]] as well as British and French political interference and territorial losses after the [[Franco-Siamese War]] in 1893 and the [[Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909]].<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Treaty between Great Britain and Siam |journal=The American Journal of International Law |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=297–304 |doi=10.2307/2212641 |jstor=2212641 |s2cid=246007886 |issn=0002-9300}}</ref> Under European colonization, Southeast Asian nations were introduced to European religions and technologies, as well as the [[Latin alphabet]].
===Expansion===
[[File:ASEAN explained in 5 minutes.webm|thumb|Video: ASEAN explained in 5 minutes]]
On 7 January 1984, [[Brunei]] became ASEAN's sixth member<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2700.htm|title=Background Note:Brunei Darussalam/Profile:/Foreign Relations|publisher=US State Department|access-date=6 March 2007|archive-date=4 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190604183451/https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2700.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> and on 28 July 1995, following the end of the [[Cold War]], [[Vietnam]] joined as the seventh member.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/10098.htm|title=Vietnam in ASEAN: Toward Cooperation for Mutual Benefits|year=2007|work=ASEAN Secretariat|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511153326/http://www.asean.org/10098.htm|archive-date=11 May 2011|access-date=28 August 2009}}</ref> [[Laos]] and [[Myanmar]] (formerly Burma) joined two years later on 23 July 1997.<ref name="enlargement">{{cite book|title=ASEAN Enlargement: impacts and implications|author1=Carolyn L. Gates|author2=Mya Than|publisher=Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|year=2001|isbn=978-981-230-081-2}}</ref> [[Cambodia]] was to join at the same time as [[Laos]] and [[Myanmar]], but a [[1997 Cambodian coup d'état|Cambodian coup in 1997]] and other internal instability delayed its entry.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Diplomatic pragmatism: ASEAN's response to the July 1997 coup {{!}} Conciliation Resources|url=https://www.c-r.org/accord/cambodia/diplomatic-pragmatism-aseans-response-july-1997-coup|access-date=2021-02-27|website=c-r.org}}</ref> It then joined on 30 April 1999 following the stabilisation of its government.<ref name="enlargement" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/3338.htm|title=Statement by the Secretary-General of ASEAN Welcoming the Kingdom of Cambodia as the Tenth Member State of ASEAN: 30 April 1999, ASEAN Secretariat|year=2008|work=ASEAN Secretariat|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511153639/http://www.asean.org/3338.htm|archive-date=11 May 2011|access-date=28 August 2009}}</ref> [[Timor-Leste]] [[Accession of Timor-Leste to ASEAN|joined ASEAN on 26 October 2025]] during the [[47th ASEAN Summit]] as its 11th member, completing a two-decade accession process.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Risling |first1=David |last2=Ng |first2=Eileen |last3=Megerian |first3=Chris |date=2025-10-26 |title=East Timor joins ASEAN in bloc's first expansion since the 1990s |url=https://apnews.com/article/east-timor-asean-first-expansion-fbc05e88d80a998a5ea542806437a76c |access-date=2025-10-27 |website=AP News |language=en}}</ref><ref name="ASEAN">{{Cite web |title=Forging a New Era: Timor-Leste Admitted into ASEAN |url=https://asean.org/forging-a-new-era-timor-leste-admitted-into-asean/ |date=2025-10-26 |access-date=2025-10-26 |website=[[Association of Southeast Asian Nations|ASEAN]]}}</ref>


The [[Empire of Japan|Japanese Empire]], in the vein of the [[Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere|Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere]] concept, sought to unite and create a pan-Asian identity against [[Western imperialism in Asia|Western colonial occupation]], but Japan's alliance with the [[Axis powers]] in [[World War II]] soured relations between many colonies of Europe and the United States. {{Citation needed|reason=States overarching claim without reasonable sources}} [[Atomic bombings of Japan]] eventuated in [[Decolonization of Asia|decolonization movements]] throughout the Southeast Asian region, resulting in mostly independent ASEAN states today.
In 2006, ASEAN was given [[United Nations General Assembly observers|observer status at the United Nations General Assembly]].<ref>[http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/news/view_article.php?article_id=28822 RP resolution for observer status in UN assembly OK'd], Philippine Daily Inquirer, 13 March 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100826051047/http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/news/view_article.php?article_id=28822 |date=26 August 2010 }}</ref> In response, the organisation awarded the status of "dialogue partner" to the UN.<ref>{{cite news |title=Philippines to Represent ASEAN in UN Meetings in NY, Geneva |url=http://asia.news.yahoo.com/070307/4/2ykdn.html |work=Yahoo! News |date=7 March 2007 |access-date=13 March 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070312113724/http://asia.news.yahoo.com/070307/4/2ykdn.html |archive-date=12 March 2007 }}</ref> The UK and ASEAN have also pursued a dialogue partnership.<ref>{{Cite web |title=You are being redirected... |url=https://asean.org/asean-uk-joint-ministerial-statement-enhancing-connectivity-for-a-prosperous-and-sustainable-future/ |access-date=2025-03-08 |website=asean.org |date=27 July 2024 }}</ref>


=== The ASEAN Charter ===
===The ASEAN Charter===
{{Main|ASEAN Charter}}


On 15 December 2008, member states met in [[Jakarta]] to launch a charter, signed in November 2007, to move closer to "an [[European Union|EU]]-style community".<ref name="AFPCharter">{{cite news|url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/momentous-day-for-asean-as-charter-comes-into-force-20081215-6yx4.html|title='Momentous' day for ASEAN as charter comes into force|website=The Sydney Morning Herald |access-date=16 December 2008}}</ref> The charter turned ASEAN into a legal entity and aimed to create a single free-trade area for the region encompassing 500 million people. [[List of Presidents of Indonesia|President of Indonesia]] [[Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono]] stated: "This is a momentous development when ASEAN is consolidating, integrating, and transforming itself into a community. It is achieved while ASEAN seeks a more vigorous role in Asian and global affairs at a time when the international system is experiencing a seismic shift". Referring to climate change and economic upheaval, he concluded: "Southeast Asia is no longer the bitterly divided, war-torn region it was in the 1960s and 1970s".
On 15 December 2008, the member states met in [[Jakarta]] to launch the charter signed in November 2007, to move closer to "an [[European Union|EU]]-style community".<ref name="AFPCharter">{{cite news|url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/momentous-day-for-asean-as-charter-comes-into-force-20081215-6yx4.html|title='Momentous' day for ASEAN as charter comes into force|website=The Sydney Morning Herald |date=15 December 2008|access-date=16 December 2008}}</ref> The charter formally established ASEAN as a legal entity, aiming to create a single trade bloc for a region encompassing 500 million people. Indonesian president [[Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono]] stated: "This is a momentous development when ASEAN is consolidating, integrating, and transforming itself into a community. It is achieved while ASEAN seeks a more vigorous role in Asian and global affairs at a time when the international system is experiencing a seismic shift". Referring to climate change and economic upheaval, he concluded: "Southeast Asia is no longer the bitterly divided, war-torn region it was in the 1960s and 1970s".


The [[financial crisis of 2007–2008]] was seen as a threat to the charter's goals,<ref name="ReutersCharter">{{cite news|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-37031520081215|title=ASEAN launches charter under shadow of crisis|author1=Olivia Rondon |author2=Suhartono, Harry|work=Reuters |access-date=16 December 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081220192555/http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-37031520081215| archive-date= 20 December 2008 | url-status=live}}</ref> and also set forth the idea of a proposed human rights body to be discussed at a future summit in February 2009. This proposition caused controversy, as the body would not have the power to impose sanctions or punish countries which violated citizens' rights and would, therefore, be limited in effectiveness.<ref name="IHTCharter">{{cite news|title=ASEAN charter comes into force |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/12/15/asia/AS-ASEAN-Charter.php |access-date=12 May 2015 |work=International Herald Tribune |agency=Associated Press |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090210032138/http://iht.com/articles/ap/2008/12/15/asia/AS-ASEAN-Charter.php |archive-date=10 February 2009 }}</ref> The body was established later in 2009 as the [[ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights]] (AICHR).  
The [[2008 financial crisis]] was seen as a threat to the charter's goals,<ref name="ReutersCharter">{{cite news |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-37031520081215|title=ASEAN launches charter under shadow of crisis|author1=Olivia Rondon |author2=Suhartono, Harry|work=Reuters |date=15 December 2008|access-date=16 December 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081220192555/http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-37031520081215| archive-date= 20 December 2008 }}</ref> and also set forth the idea of a proposed human rights body to be discussed at a future summit in February 2009. This proposition caused controversy, although the body would not have the power to impose sanctions or punish countries which violated citizens' rights and would, therefore, be limited in effectiveness.<ref name="IHTCharter">{{cite news|title=ASEAN charter comes into force |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/12/15/asia/AS-ASEAN-Charter.php |access-date=12 May 2015 |work=International Herald Tribune |via=Associated Press |date=15 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090210032138/http://iht.com/articles/ap/2008/12/15/asia/AS-ASEAN-Charter.php |archive-date=10 February 2009 }}</ref> The body was established later in 2009 as the [[ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights]] (AICHR).


In November 2012, the commission adopted the [[ASEAN Human Rights Declaration]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Wong|first1=Chun Han|title=Asean Human-Rights Pledge Leaves Critics Cool|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323353204578126803863141948|access-date=8 February 2015|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] Asia|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053136/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323353204578126803863141948|url-status=live}}</ref> However, their human rights declaration has been critiqued widely by the international community, with the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights stating that the declaration was worded in problematic ways that do not easily align with international norms. Likewise, the Human Rights Watch in the United States noted several important fundamental rights were omitted or not clearly established.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The ASEAN Political-Security Community and Its Dilemmas {{!}} The SAGE Handbook of Asian Foreign Policy - Credo Reference |url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/sageukasian/the_asean_political_security_community_and_its_dilemmas/0 |access-date=2023-05-22 |website=search.credoreference.com}}</ref>  
In November 2012, the commission adopted the [[ASEAN Human Rights Declaration]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Wong|first1=Chun Han|title=Asean Human-Rights Pledge Leaves Critics Cool|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323353204578126803863141948|access-date=8 February 2015|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] Asia|date=18 November 2012|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053136/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323353204578126803863141948|url-status=live}}</ref> However, their human rights declaration has been critiqued widely by the international community, with the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights stating that the declaration was worded in problematic ways that do not easily align with international norms. Likewise, the [[Human Rights Watch]] in the [[United States of America]] noted several important fundamental rights were omitted or not clearly established.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The ASEAN Political-Security Community and Its Dilemmas {{!}} The SAGE Handbook of Asian Foreign Policy Credo Reference |url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/sageukasian/the_asean_political_security_community_and_its_dilemmas/0 |access-date=2023-05-22 |website=search.credoreference.com}}</ref>


The ASEAN Chairmanship role for 2023 is held by Indonesia. It has been held by the following nations in recent years:<ref>{{Cite web |title=ASEAN Chairmanship Role |url=https://asean.org/category/chairmanship/ |access-date=22 May 2023 |website=ASEAN Website}}</ref>  
The chairmanship of ASEAN rotates among the member states. The [[Philippines]] holds the position for 2026. Recent ASEAN chairs are as follows:<ref>{{Cite web |title=ASEAN Chairmanship Role |url=https://asean.org/category/chairmanship/ |access-date=January 15, 2025 |website=ASEAN Website}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
{| class="wikitable" style="border:none;"
|+ASEAN Chairs
|+ASEAN Chairs
!Country
!Year!!Country
!Year
|rowspan="99" style="border:none;background:transparent;"|
|-
!Year!!Country
|Thailand
|rowspan="99" style="border:none;background:transparent;"|
|2008-9
!Year!!Country
|-
|Viet Nam
|2010
|-
|Indonesia
|2011
|-
|Cambodia
|2012
|-
|Brunei
|2013
|-
|Myanmar
|2014
|-
|-
|Malaysia
|2008||{{flag|Thailand}}
|2015
|2015||{{flag|Malaysia}}
|2022||{{flag|Cambodia}}
|-
|-
|Lao PDR
|2009||{{flag|Thailand}}
|2016
|2016||{{flag|Laos}}
|2023||{{flag|Indonesia}}
|-
|-
|Philippines
|2010||{{flag|Vietnam}}
|2017
|2017||{{flag|Philippines}}
|2024||{{flag|Laos}}
|-
|-
|Singapore
|2011||{{flag|Indonesia}}
|2018
|2018||{{flag|Singapore}}
|2025||{{flag|Malaysia}}
|-
|-
|Thailand
|2012||{{flag|Cambodia}}
|2019
|2019||{{flag|Thailand}}
|2026||{{flag|Philippines}}
|-
|-
|Viet Nam
|2013||{{flag|Brunei}}
|2020
|2020||{{flag|Vietnam}}
|-
|-
|Brunei
|2014||{{flag|Myanmar}}
|2021
|2021||{{flag|Brunei}}
|-
|Cambodia
|2022
|}
|}


=== Public health ===
===Public health===
In response to pandemics, ASEAN has coordinated with ASEAN+3 and other actors to create a regional public health response.
In response to pandemics, ASEAN has coordinated with ASEAN+3 and other actors to create a regional public health response.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ASEAN Health Sector Efforts in the Prevention, Detection and Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |url=https://asean.org/asean-health-sector-efforts-in-the-prevention-detection-and-response-to-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-1/ |access-date=2025-01-15 |website=asean.org}}</ref>
 
==== SARS outbreak ====
During the [[2002–2004 SARS outbreak|SARS outbreak]], ASEAN and ASEAN+3 worked together to devise a response to the outbreak. Immediate and short-to-medium term measures were devised. The parties agreed to enhance sharing of best practices against the disease while also agreeing to bolster collaboration between their respective health authorities and harmonize travel procedures to ensure that proper health screening would occur. In addition, China offered to contribute $1.2 million to the ASEAN SARS fund, made both to show that it was willing to cooperate with the rest of the region and make amends for its withholding of information during the initial stages of the outbreak.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Caballero-Anthony |first=Mely |title=SARS in Asia: Crisis, Vulnerabilities, and Regional Responses |url=https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2005.45.3.475 |journal=Asian Survey |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=475–495|doi=10.1525/as.2005.45.3.475 }}</ref>
 
==== H1N1 pandemic ====
ASEAN held a special meeting between ASEAN and ASEAN+3 health ministers on May 8, 2009 on responding to the [[2009 swine flu pandemic|H1N1 pandemic]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Press Release – "Full Marks" for ASEAN in Common Defense Against Influenza A (H1N1), Bangkok, 8 May 2009 |url=https://asean.org/press-release-full-marks-for-asean-in-common-defense-against-influenza-a-h1n1-bangkok-8-may-2009-2/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210615011241/https://asean.org/press-release-full-marks-for-asean-in-common-defense-against-influenza-a-h1n1-bangkok-8-may-2009-2/ |archive-date=15 June 2021 |website=ASEAN}}</ref> At this meeting, it was agreed that hotlines would be established between public health authorities, joint response teams would be formed, and ongoing research efforts would be bolstered.


=== Myanmar crisis ===
====SARS outbreak====
Since 2017, political, military and ethnic affairs in [[Myanmar]] have posed unusual challenges for ASEAN, creating precedent-breaking situations and threatening the traditions and unity of the group, and its global standing<ref name="myanmar_coup_asean_split_2021_03_29_dw_com">[https://www.dw.com/en/myanmar-coup-asean-ties/a-57042503 "Myanmar coup: ASEAN split over the way forward,"] March 29, 2021, [[Deutsche Welle]], ([https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4163647 same article] at ''[[Taiwan News]]'') retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_future_2021_06_21_foreignpolicy_com">Laksmana, Evan A. (Centre on Asia and Globalisation, [[National University of Singapore]]): [https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/06/21/asean-myanmar-brunei-southeast-asia-special-envoy-junta-humanitarian-aid-aha-center/ "ASEAN's Future Will Be Decided in Myanmar,"] date, ''[[Foreign Policy (magazine)|Foreign Policy]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="myanmar_pushes_asean_lowyinstitute_org">Williams, Nicola: [https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/myanmar-pushes-asean-brink "Myanmar pushes ASEAN to the brink,"] June 10, 2021, ''The Interpreter,'' [[Lowy Institute]], retrieved November 8, 2021 (''"The Myanmar coup presents to ASEAN the most serious threat to the importance of its regional diplomacy since the Cold War."'')</ref><ref name="myanmars_crisis_tests_asean_2021_08_27_brookings_edu">[https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/08/27/myanmars-crisis-tests-asean/  "Myanmar's crisis tests ASEAN,"] August 27, 2021, ''Southeast Asia Insights,'' [[Brookings Institution]], retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="myanmar_crisis_2021_03_04_asia_times">Bowie, Nile [https://asiatimes.com/2021/03/myanmar-crisis-now-or-never-moment-for-asean/ "Myanmar crisis now or never moment for ASEAN,"] March 4, 2021, ''[[Asia Times]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref>—with ASEAN responses indicating possible fundamental change in the nature of the organization.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com">[https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-11-08/rohingya-crisis-suu-kyi-under-the-microscope-at-southeast-asia-summit "Rohingya Crisis, Suu Kyi Under the Microscope at Southeast Asia Summit,"] November 8, 2018, [[Reuters News Service]] in  ''[[U.S. News]],'' (same article at ''[[New York Times]]'' [https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2018/11/08/world/asia/08reuters-asean-summit.html]), retrieved November 2018</ref><ref name="breaking_resistance_2018_12_06_jakarta_post">Wisnu, Dinna (Indonesian representative to the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights):  [http://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2018/12/06/breaking-resistance-to-human-rights-democracies-and-rohingya.html "Breaking resistance to human rights: Democracies and Rohingya,"]  December 6, 2018, ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' retrieved December 2018</ref><ref name="asean_pushes_boundaries_2021_04_26_reuters">{{Cite news |last=Wongcha-um |first=Panu |last2=Johnson |first2=Kay |title=Analysis: On Myanmar, ASEAN pushes boundaries of "non-interference" |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/myanmar-asean-pushes-boundaries-non-interference-2021-04-26/ |access-date=2023-05-22}}</ref><ref name="why_aseans_rebuke_2021_10_21_iiss_org">[https://www.iiss.org/blogs/analysis/2021/10/why-aseans-rebuke-of-myanmars-top-general-matters Analysis: "Why ASEAN's rebuke of Myanmar's top general matters,"] October 21, 2021, [[International Institute for Strategic Studies]], retrieved November, 2021</ref><ref name="sign_of_change_2021_10_20_asialink">Coppel, Nicholas ([[Monash University]], former Australian Ambassador to Myanmar): [https://asialink.unimelb.edu.au/insights/aseans-snub-to-myanmar-junta-a-sign-of-change "ASEAN's snub to Myanmar junta a sign of change,"] October 20, 2021, ''[[Asialink#Asialink Insights|Asialink Insights]],'' [[Asialink]], [[University of Melbourne]], retrieved November 8, 2021</ref>
During the [[2002–2004 SARS outbreak|SARS outbreak]], ASEAN and ASEAN+3 worked together to devise a response to the outbreak. Immediate and short-to-medium term measures were devised. The parties agreed to enhance sharing of best practices against the disease while also agreeing to bolster collaboration between their respective health authorities and harmonise travel procedures to ensure that proper health screening would occur. In addition, China offered to contribute $1.2 million to the ASEAN SARS fund, made both to show that it was willing to cooperate with the rest of the region and make amends for its withholding of information during the initial stages of the outbreak.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Caballero-Anthony |first=Mely |date=June 2005 |title=SARS in Asia: Crisis, Vulnerabilities, and Regional Responses |journal=Asian Survey |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=475–495|doi=10.1525/as.2005.45.3.475 }}</ref>


==== Rohingya genocide ====
====H1N1 Pandemic====
ASEAN held a special meeting between ASEAN and ASEAN+3 health ministers on 8 May 2009, on responding to the [[2009 swine flu pandemic|H1N1 pandemic]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=9 May 2009 |title=Press Release – "Full Marks" for ASEAN in Common Defense Against Influenza A (H1N1), Bangkok, 8 May 2009 |url=https://asean.org/press-release-full-marks-for-asean-in-common-defense-against-influenza-a-h1n1-bangkok-8-may-2009-2/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210615011241/https://asean.org/press-release-full-marks-for-asean-in-common-defense-against-influenza-a-h1n1-bangkok-8-may-2009-2/ |archive-date=15 June 2021 |website=ASEAN}}</ref> At this meeting, it was agreed that hotlines would be established between public health authorities, joint response teams would be formed, and oaseangoing research efforts would be bolstered.


The [[Rohingya genocide]] erupting in [[Myanmar]] in August 2017—killing thousands of [[Rohingya people]] in Myanmar,<ref name="msf_estimates_2017_12_13_bbc">[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42348214 "MSF estimates more than 6,700 Rohingya killed in Myanmar,"]  December 13, 2017, [[BBC News]], retrieved December 2017 (same topic at [[CBS News]][https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rohingya-myanmar-thousands-killed-2-months-doctors-without-borders-msf-says/], [[The Independent]][http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/rohingya-crisis-latest-6700-muslims-killed-two-months-burma-doctors-without-borders-persecution-a8109131.html], [[Toronto Star]][https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/12/14/at-least-6700-rohingya-killed-in-myanmar-between-august-and-september-aid-group-says.html], and [[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]][http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-14/rohingya-death-toll-in-the-thousands-says-msf/9260552])</ref><ref name="kill_all_you_see_2020_09_08_nytimes_com ">[https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/08/world/asia/myanmar-rohingya-genocide.html "'Kill All You See': In a First, Myanmar Soldiers Tell of Rohingya Slaughter,"] September 8, 2020, ''[[New York Times]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="estimated_24000_murdered_2018_08_17_dhaka_tribune">[https://www.dhakatribune.com/world/south-asia/2018/08/17/study-claims-an-estimated-24-000-rohingya-murdered-in-myanmar "Study claims an estimated 24,000 Rohingyas murdered in Myanmar"] August 17, 2018, ''[[Dhaka Tribune]]'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref> driving most into neighboring [[Bangladesh]], and continuing for months<ref name="refugees_flee_2017_09_05_reuters_nbc">[https://www.nbcnews.com/slideshow/rohingya-muslims-flee-myanmar-trudging-through-treacherous-terrain-n798896 "Over 123,000 Rohingya Refugees Flee Violence in Myanmar,"], September 5, 2017, [[Reuters News Service]] / ''[[NBC]]'' retrieved September 2017</ref><ref name="textbook_example_2017_09_12_wash_post">[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/textbook-example-of-ethnic-cleansing--370000-rohingyas-flood-bangladesh-as-crisis-worsens/2017/09/12/24bf290e-8792-41e9-a769-c79d7326bed0_story.html "'Textbook example of ethnic cleansing': 370,000 Rohingyas flood Bangladesh as crisis worsens,"], September 12, 2017, ''[[Washington Post]]'' retrieved September 2017</ref><ref name="myanmar_planned_attacks_2017_21_19_afp_cna">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/myanmar-planned-rohingya-attacks-possibly-genocide-un-rights-9508588 "Myanmar 'planned' Rohingya attacks, possibly 'genocide': UN rights chief,"] December 19, 2017, [[Agence France-Presse]] in ''[[Channel NewsAsia]],'' (also at [[SBS News]] [https://www.sbs.com.au/news/myanmar-planned-rohingya-attacks-possibly-genocide-un-rights-chief], retrieved December 2017</ref><ref name="genocide_survivors_2017_12_17_smh_com_au">[http://www.smh.com.au/interactive/2017/Rohingya-crisis-lives-in-limbo/ "Genocide survivors in Bangladesh refugee camps face new threats,"], ''[[Sydney Morning Herald]]'' retrieved December 2017</ref>—created a global outcry demanding ASEAN take action against the civilian-military [[coalition government]] of Myanmar, which had long discriminated against the Rohingya, and had launched the 2017 attacks upon them.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="aseans_limited_role_2018_10_12_thediplomat_com ">[https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/aseans-limited-role-in-solving-the-rohingya-crisis/ "ASEAN's Limited Role in Solving the Rohingya Crisis,"] October 12, 2018, ''[[The Diplomat]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="the_rohingya_crisis_us_response_2017_10_05_state_gov ">[https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-rohingya-crisis-u-s-response-to-the-tragedy-in-burma/index.html " The Rohingya Crisis: U.S. Response to the Tragedy in Burma,"] testimony, October 5, 2017, ''[[U.S. State Department]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post">Septiari, Dian: [https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/06/26/totally-shameful-outrage-as-asean-nations-abandon-rohingya-boat-people.html "'Totally shameful': Outrage as ASEAN nations abandon Rohingya boat people,"] June 26, 2020, ''[[Jakarta Post]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref>
===Myanmar crisis===
Since 2017, political, military and ethnic affairs in [[Myanmar]] have posed unusual challenges for ASEAN, creating precedent-breaking situations and threatening the traditions and unity of the group, and its global standing<ref name="myanmar_coup_asean_split_2021_03_29_dw_com">[https://www.dw.com/en/myanmar-coup-asean-ties/a-57042503 "Myanmar coup: ASEAN split over the way forward,"] 29 March 2021, [[Deutsche Welle]], ([https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4163647 same article] at ''[[Taiwan News]]'') retrieved 7 November 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_future_2021_06_21_foreignpolicy_com">Laksmana, Evan A. (Centre on Asia and Globalisation, [[National University of Singapore]]): [https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/06/21/asean-myanmar-brunei-southeast-asia-special-envoy-junta-humanitarian-aid-aha-center/ "ASEAN's Future Will Be Decided in Myanmar,"] date, ''[[Foreign Policy (magazine)|Foreign Policy]],'' retrieved 7 November 2021</ref><ref name="myanmar_pushes_asean_lowyinstitute_org">Williams, Nicola: [https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/myanmar-pushes-asean-brink "Myanmar pushes ASEAN to the brink,"] 10 June 2021, ''The Interpreter,'' [[Lowy Institute]], retrieved 8 November 2021 (''"The Myanmar coup presents to ASEAN the most serious threat to the importance of its regional diplomacy since the Cold War."'')</ref> - with ASEAN responses indicating possible fundamental change in the nature of the organisation.<ref name="breaking_resistance_2018_12_06_jakarta_post">Wisnu, Dinna (Indonesian representative to the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights):  [http://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2018/12/06/breaking-resistance-to-human-rights-democracies-and-rohingya.html "Breaking resistance to human rights: Democracies and Rohingya,"] 6 December 2018, ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' retrieved December 2018</ref><ref name="asean_pushes_boundaries_2021_04_26_reuters">{{Cite news |last1=Wongcha-um |first1=Panu |last2=Johnson |first2=Kay |date=2021-04-26 |title=Analysis: On Myanmar, ASEAN pushes boundaries of "non-interference"|work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/myanmar-asean-pushes-boundaries-non-interference-2021-04-26/ |access-date=2023-05-22}}</ref><ref name="why_aseans_rebuke_2021_10_21_iiss_org">[https://www.iiss.org/blogs/analysis/2021/10/why-aseans-rebuke-of-myanmars-top-general-matters Analysis: "Why ASEAN's rebuke of Myanmar's top general matters,"] 21 October 2021, [[International Institute for Strategic Studies]], retrieved November, 2021</ref>


As the Rohingya were predominantly [[Muslim]] (in [[Buddhist]]-dominated Myanmar), and the ethnic cleansing was framed in religious terms, other largely-Muslim ASEAN nations (particularly Malaysia,<ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes">Muslimin, Anis Shakirah Mohd: [https://www.forbes.com/sites/anismuslimin/2017/12/17/aseans-rohingya-response-barely-a-peep-outside-of-malaysia/ "ASEAN's Rohingya Response: Barely a Peep Outside of Malaysia"] December 17, 2017, ''[[Forbes]]'' retrieved December 2017</ref><ref name="aung_san_suu_kyi_asks_2018_03_18_theguardian_com">[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/18/aung-san-suu-kyi-asks-australia-and-asean-for-help-with-rohingya-crisis "Aung San Suu Kyi asks Australia and ASEAN for help with Rohingya crisis,"] March 18, 2018, ''[[The Guardian]],'' retrieved March 2018</ref><ref name="mahathir_slams_suu_kyi_2018_11_13_ap_foxnews">[https://www.foxnews.com/world/mahathir-slams-myanmars-suu-kyi-for-handling-of-rohingya "Mahathir slams Myanmar's Suu Kyi for handling of Rohingya"]  November 13, 2018, [[Associated Press]] in [[Fox News]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref> Indonesia,<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" /> Singapore,<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /> and Brunei<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" />) objected, some strongly<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="myanmar_coup_asean_split_2021_03_29_dw_com" /><ref name="islamic_countries_2018_05_07_times_of_india">[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/islamic-countries-call-rohingya-crisis-ethnic-cleansing/articleshow/64063168.cms  "Islamic countries call Rohingya crisis 'ethnic cleansing',"] May 7, 2018, ''[[Times of India]]'' retrieved May 2018</ref>—and also objected to the burden of Rohingya refugees arriving on their shores<ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post"/> (as did ASEAN neighbors Buddhist-dominated Thailand<ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post" /><ref name="asean_must_pressure_2018_12_17_thestar_com_my">[https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2018/12/17/asean-must-pressure-myanmar-and-suu-kyi-on-rohingya-issue/ "ASEAN must pressure Myanmar and Suu Kyi on Rohingya issue, says Dr M.,"] December 17, 2018, ''[[The Star (Malaysia)|The Star]]''  (Malaysia)  retrieved December 2018</ref> and Muslim-dominated observer-nation Bangladesh.<ref name="bd_wants_safe_zone_2019 Jan 29_unb_com_bd">[http://unb.com.bd/category/Bangladesh/bd-wants-myanmar-to-create-safe-zone-for-rohingyas-under-supervision-of-asean/11615 "BD wants Myanmar to create safe zone for Rohingyas under supervision of ASEAN,"]  January 29, 2019, ''[[United News of Bangladesh]],'' retrieved February 2019</ref><ref name="dhaka_seeks_2019_07_22_thedailystar_net">[https://www.thedailystar.net/rohingya-crisis/myanmar-rohingya-crisis-dhaka-seeks-nam-asean-member-states-role-1775227 "Dhaka seeks NAM, ASEAN member states' role,"] July 22, 2019, ''[[Daily Star (Bangladesh)]],'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="bangladesh_calls_2021_04_20_cnbc">[https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/20/bangladesh-calls-on-asean-to-pressure-myanmar-to-take-rohingya-refugees-.html "Bangladesh calls on ASEAN to pressure Myanmar to take Rohingya refugees,"] April 20, 2021, ''[[CNBC]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref>
====Rohingya genocide====
The [[Rohingya genocide]] erupting in [[Myanmar]] in August 2017 - killing thousands of [[Rohingya people]] in Myanmar,<ref name="msf_estimates_2017_12_13_bbc">[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42348214 "MSF estimates more than 6,700 Rohingya killed in Myanmar,"]  13 December 2017, [[BBC News]], retrieved December 2017 (same topic at [[CBS News]][https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rohingya-myanmar-thousands-killed-2-months-doctors-without-borders-msf-says/], [[The Independent]][http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/rohingya-crisis-latest-6700-muslims-killed-two-months-burma-doctors-without-borders-persecution-a8109131.html], [[Toronto Star]][https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/12/14/at-least-6700-rohingya-killed-in-myanmar-between-august-and-september-aid-group-says.html], and [[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]][http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-14/rohingya-death-toll-in-the-thousands-says-msf/9260552])</ref><ref name="kill_all_you_see_2020_09_08_nytimes_com">[https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/08/world/asia/myanmar-rohingya-genocide.html "'Kill All You See': In a First, Myanmar Soldiers Tell of Rohingya Slaughter,"] 8 September 2020, ''[[New York Times]],'' retrieved 7 November 2021</ref><ref name="estimated_24000_murdered_2018_08_17_dhaka_tribune">[https://www.dhakatribune.com/world/south-asia/2018/08/17/study-claims-an-estimated-24-000-rohingya-murdered-in-myanmar "Study claims an estimated 24,000 Rohingyas murdered in Myanmar"] 17 August 2018, ''[[Dhaka Tribune]]'' retrieved 7 November 2021</ref> driving most into neighbouring [[Bangladesh]], and continuing for months<ref name="refugees_flee_2017_09_05_reuters_nbc">[https://www.nbcnews.com/slideshow/rohingya-muslims-flee-myanmar-trudging-through-treacherous-terrain-n798896 "Over 123,000 Rohingya Refugees Flee Violence in Myanmar,"], 5 September 2017, [[Reuters News Service]] / ''[[NBC]]'' retrieved September 2017</ref><ref name="textbook_example_2017_09_12_wash_post">[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/textbook-example-of-ethnic-cleansing--370000-rohingyas-flood-bangladesh-as-crisis-worsens/2017/09/12/24bf290e-8792-41e9-a769-c79d7326bed0_story.html "'Textbook example of ethnic cleansing': 370,000 Rohingyas flood Bangladesh as crisis worsens,"], 12 September 2017, ''[[Washington Post]]'' retrieved September 2017</ref><ref name="myanmar_planned_attacks_2017_21_19_afp_cna">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/myanmar-planned-rohingya-attacks-possibly-genocide-un-rights-9508588 "Myanmar 'planned' Rohingya attacks, possibly 'genocide': UN rights chief,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171223043844/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/myanmar-planned-rohingya-attacks-possibly-genocide-un-rights-9508588|date=23 December 2017}} 19 December 2017, [[Agence France-Presse]] in ''[[Channel NewsAsia]],'' (also at [[SBS News]] [https://www.sbs.com.au/news/myanmar-planned-rohingya-attacks-possibly-genocide-un-rights-chief], retrieved December 2017</ref> - created a global outcry demanding ASEAN take action against the civilian-military [[coalition government]] of Myanmar, which had long discriminated against the Rohingya, and had launched the 2017 attacks upon them.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com">[https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2018-11-08/rohingya-crisis-suu-kyi-under-the-microscope-at-southeast-asia-summit "Rohingya Crisis, Suu Kyi Under the Microscope at Southeast Asia Summit,"] 8 November 2018, [[Reuters News Service]] in  ''[[U.S. News]],'' (same article at ''[[New York Times]]'' [https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2018/11/08/world/asia/08reuters-asean-summit.html]), retrieved November 2018</ref><ref name="aseans_limited_role_2018_10_12_thediplomat_com">[https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/aseans-limited-role-in-solving-the-rohingya-crisis/ "ASEAN's Limited Role in Solving the Rohingya Crisis,"] 12 October 2018, ''[[The Diplomat (magazine)|The Diplomat]],'' retrieved 7 November 2021</ref><ref name="the_rohingya_crisis_us_response_2017_10_05_state_gov">[https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-rohingya-crisis-u-s-response-to-the-tragedy-in-burma/index.html " The Rohingya Crisis: U.S. Response to the Tragedy in Burma,"] testimony, 5 October 2017, ''[[U.S. State Department]],'' retrieved 7 November 2021</ref>
<!--
As the Rohingya were predominantly [[Muslim]] (in [[Buddhist]]-dominated Myanmar), and the ethnic cleansing was framed in religious terms, other largely-Muslim ASEAN nations (particularly Malaysia,<ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes">Muslimin, Anis Shakirah Mohd: [https://www.forbes.com/sites/anismuslimin/2017/12/17/aseans-rohingya-response-barely-a-peep-outside-of-malaysia/ "ASEAN's Rohingya Response: Barely a Peep Outside of Malaysia"] December 17, 2017, ''[[Forbes]]'' retrieved December 2017</ref><ref name="aung_san_suu_kyi_asks_2018_03_18_theguardian_com">[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/18/aung-san-suu-kyi-asks-australia-and-asean-for-help-with-rohingya-crisis "Aung San Suu Kyi asks Australia and ASEAN for help with Rohingya crisis,"] March 18, 2018, ''[[The Guardian]],'' retrieved March 2018</ref><ref name="mahathir_slams_suu_kyi_2018_11_13_ap_foxnews">[https://www.foxnews.com/world/mahathir-slams-myanmars-suu-kyi-for-handling-of-rohingya "Mahathir slams Myanmar's Suu Kyi for handling of Rohingya"]  November 13, 2018, [[Associated Press]] in [[Fox News]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref> Indonesia,<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" /> Singapore,<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /> and Brunei<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" />) objected, some strongly<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="myanmar_coup_asean_split_2021_03_29_dw_com" /><ref name="islamic_countries_2018_05_07_times_of_india">[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/islamic-countries-call-rohingya-crisis-ethnic-cleansing/articleshow/64063168.cms  "Islamic countries call Rohingya crisis 'ethnic cleansing',"] May 7, 2018, ''[[Times of India]]'' retrieved May 2018</ref>—and also objected to the burden of Rohingya refugees arriving on their shores<ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post" /> (as did ASEAN neighbours Buddhist-dominated Thailand<ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post" /><ref name="asean_must_pressure_2018_12_17_thestar_com_my">[https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2018/12/17/asean-must-pressure-myanmar-and-suu-kyi-on-rohingya-issue/ "ASEAN must pressure Myanmar and Suu Kyi on Rohingya issue, says Dr M.,"] December 17, 2018, ''[[The Star (Malaysia)|The Star]]''  (Malaysia)  retrieved December 2018</ref> and Muslim-dominated observer-nation Bangladesh.<ref name="bd_wants_safe_zone_2019 Jan 29_unb_com_bd">[http://unb.com.bd/category/Bangladesh/bd-wants-myanmar-to-create-safe-zone-for-rohingyas-under-supervision-of-asean/11615 "BD wants Myanmar to create safe zone for Rohingyas under supervision of ASEAN,"]  January 29, 2019, ''[[United News of Bangladesh]],'' retrieved February 2019</ref><ref name="dhaka_seeks_2019_07_22_thedailystar_net">[https://www.thedailystar.net/rohingya-crisis/myanmar-rohingya-crisis-dhaka-seeks-nam-asean-member-states-role-1775227 "Dhaka seeks NAM, ASEAN member states' role,"] July 22, 2019, ''[[Daily Star (Bangladesh)]],'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="bangladesh_calls_2021_04_20_cnbc">[https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/20/bangladesh-calls-on-asean-to-pressure-myanmar-to-take-rohingya-refugees-.html "Bangladesh calls on ASEAN to pressure Myanmar to take Rohingya refugees,"] April 20, 2021, ''[[CNBC]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref>


Myanmar's civilian leader, [[Aung San Suu Kyi]], also reportedly asked ASEAN for help with the Rohingya crisis, in March 2018, but was rebuffed by ASEAN's chair, who said it was an "internal matter."<ref name="aung_san_suu_kyi_asks_2018_03_18_theguardian_com" />
Myanmar's civilian leader, [[Aung San Suu Kyi]], also reportedly asked ASEAN for help with the Rohingya crisis, in March 2018, but was rebuffed by ASEAN's chair, who said it was an "internal matter".<ref name="aung_san_suu_kyi_asks_2018_03_18_theguardian_com" />


ASEAN had a longstanding firm policy of "non-interference in the internal affairs of member nations," and was reluctant, as an organization, to take sides in the conflict, or act materially.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" /><ref name="se_asia_summit_draft_2017_11_12_reuters">[http://www.reuters.com/article/us-asean-summit-myanmar/southeast-asia-summit-draft-statement-skips-over-rohingya-crisis-idUSKBN1DD0CP?il=0 "Southeast Asia summit draft statement skips over Rohingya crisis,"] November 12, 2017, [[Reuters News Service]] (also at ''[[Bangkok Post]]'' [https://www.bangkokpost.com/news/asean/1359704/asean-summit-draft-statement-skips-over-rohingya-crisis]), retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="suu_kyi_benefits_2017_11_13_cbs">[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/asean-summit-aung-san-suu-kyi-rohingya-crisis-myanmar/ "Suu Kyi benefits from neighbors' silence on Rohingya,"] November 13, 2017, [[CBS News]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>
ASEAN had a longstanding firm policy of "non-interference in the internal affairs of member nations," and was reluctant, as an organisation, to take sides in the conflict, or act materially.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" /><ref name="se_asia_summit_draft_2017_11_12_reuters">[http://www.reuters.com/article/us-asean-summit-myanmar/southeast-asia-summit-draft-statement-skips-over-rohingya-crisis-idUSKBN1DD0CP?il=0 "Southeast Asia summit draft statement skips over Rohingya crisis,"] November 12, 2017, [[Reuters News Service]] (also at ''[[Bangkok Post]]'' [https://www.bangkokpost.com/news/asean/1359704/asean-summit-draft-statement-skips-over-rohingya-crisis]), retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="suu_kyi_benefits_2017_11_13_cbs">[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/asean-summit-aung-san-suu-kyi-rohingya-crisis-myanmar/ "Suu Kyi benefits from neighbors' silence on Rohingya,"] November 13, 2017, [[CBS News]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>


Internal<ref name="asean_mps_2018_09_08_unb_thedailystar_net">[https://www.thedailystar.net/rohingya-crisis/news/asean-mps-lawmakers-welcome-icc-jurisdiction-over-crimes-against-rohingya-myanmar-1630597 "Asean MPs welcome ICC jurisdiction over crimes against Rohingya,"]  September 8, 2018, [[United News of Bangladesh]] in ''[[The Daily Star (Bangladesh)|The Daily Star]],'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref> and international<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="asean_prioritize_2019_06_19_dhaka_tribune">[https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/rohingya-crisis/2019/06/19/human-rights-organizations-call-on-asean-to-prioritize-rohingya-rights  "Asean: Prioritize Rohingya rights, safety; The organizations highlighted this as Southeast Asian leaders prepare to meet in Bangkok,"] June 19, 2019, ''[[Dhaka Tribune]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref> pressure mounted for ASEAN to take a firmer stance on the Rohingya crisis, and by late 2018, the group's global credibility was threatened by its inaction.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post" /><ref name="asean_will_help_2018_09_30_straits_times">Ghosh, Nirmal: [https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/asean-will-help-but-myanmar-has-to-exercise-responsibility-on-rohingya-issue Singapore's Foreign Minister:  "Asean will help, but Myanmar has to exercise responsibility on Rohingya issue,"]  September 30, 2018, ''[[Straits Times]]'' (Singapore), retrieved October 2018</ref>
Internal<ref name="asean_mps_2018_09_08_unb_thedailystar_net">[https://www.thedailystar.net/rohingya-crisis/news/asean-mps-lawmakers-welcome-icc-jurisdiction-over-crimes-against-rohingya-myanmar-1630597 "Asean MPs welcome ICC jurisdiction over crimes against Rohingya,"]  September 8, 2018, [[United News of Bangladesh]] in ''[[The Daily Star (Bangladesh)|The Daily Star]],'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref> and international<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="asean_prioritize_2019_06_19_dhaka_tribune">[https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/rohingya-crisis/2019/06/19/human-rights-organizations-call-on-asean-to-prioritize-rohingya-rights  "Asean: Prioritize Rohingya rights, safety; The organizations highlighted this as Southeast Asian leaders prepare to meet in Bangkok,"] June 19, 2019, ''[[Dhaka Tribune]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref> pressure mounted for ASEAN to take a firmer stance on the Rohingya crisis, and by late 2018, the group's global credibility was threatened by its inaction.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post" /><ref name="asean_will_help_2018_09_30_straits_times">Ghosh, Nirmal: [https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/asean-will-help-but-myanmar-has-to-exercise-responsibility-on-rohingya-issue Singapore's Foreign Minister:  "Asean will help, but Myanmar has to exercise responsibility on Rohingya issue,"]  September 30, 2018, ''[[Straits Times]]'' (Singapore), retrieved October 2018</ref>
Line 220: Line 234:
However ASEAN's positions on the issue largely divided on religious lines, with Muslim nations siding more with the Rohingya, while Buddhist nations initially sided more with Myanmar's government, threatening a [[sectarianism|sectarian]] division of ASEAN. [[authoritarianism|Authoritarian]] ASEAN nations, too (mostly Buddhist), were less enthusiastic than [[democracy|democratic]] ASEAN nations (mostly Muslim), about holding Myanmar officials accountable for crimes against their Rohingya minority.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" /><ref name="bd_wants_safe_zone_2019 Jan 29_unb_com_bd" />
However ASEAN's positions on the issue largely divided on religious lines, with Muslim nations siding more with the Rohingya, while Buddhist nations initially sided more with Myanmar's government, threatening a [[sectarianism|sectarian]] division of ASEAN. [[authoritarianism|Authoritarian]] ASEAN nations, too (mostly Buddhist), were less enthusiastic than [[democracy|democratic]] ASEAN nations (mostly Muslim), about holding Myanmar officials accountable for crimes against their Rohingya minority.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="barely_a_peep_2017_12_17_forbes" /><ref name="bd_wants_safe_zone_2019 Jan 29_unb_com_bd" />


But, by late-2018, most ASEAN nations had begun to advocate for a more forceful ASEAN response to the Rohingya crisis, and a harder line against Myanmar—breaking with the group's traditional policy of "non-interference" in members' "internal affairs"—a break emphasized by the Rohingya crisis being formally placed on the December 2018 ASEAN summit agenda.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="asean_must_pressure_2018_12_17_thestar_com_my" /><ref name="on_the_rohingya_2018_12_27_aseannews_net">[http://www.aseannews.net/rohingya-asean-meeting-message/ "On the Rohingya, the ASEAN Meeting was the Message,"]  December 27, 2018, ''[[ASEAN News]]'' (also at ''[[Bangkok Post]]'' [http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1169161/rohingya-plight-now-an-asean-issue]) retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>
But, by late-2018, most ASEAN nations had begun to advocate for a more forceful ASEAN response to the Rohingya crisis, and a harder line against Myanmar—breaking with the group's traditional policy of "non-interference" in members' "internal affairs"—a break emphasizsed by the Rohingya crisis being formally placed on the December 2018 ASEAN summit agenda.<ref name="under_microscope_2018_11_08_reuters_usnews_com" /><ref name="asean_must_pressure_2018_12_17_thestar_com_my" /><ref name="on_the_rohingya_2018_12_27_aseannews_net">[http://www.aseannews.net/rohingya-asean-meeting-message/ "On the Rohingya, the ASEAN Meeting was the Message,"]  December 27, 2018, ''[[ASEAN News]]'' (also at ''[[Bangkok Post]]'' [http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1169161/rohingya-plight-now-an-asean-issue]) retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>


In early 2019, Bangladesh suggested that Myanmar create a safe haven for the Rohingya within its borders, under ASEAN supervision<ref name="bd_wants_safe_zone_2019 Jan 29_unb_com_bd" /> (later expanding that idea to include India, China and Japan among the supervisors).<ref name="india_should_monitor_2019_02_10_the_hindu">[https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/india-should-monitor-safety-of-rohingya/article26231318.ece "'India should monitor safety of Rohingya':  Bangladesh,"]  February 10, 2019, ''[[The Hindu]]'' (India), retrieved February 2019</ref><ref name="myanmar_asean_team 2019_07_26_irrawaddy">[https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-asean-team-visit-rohingyas-camp.html "Myanmar, ASEAN Team to Visit Rohingyas Camp,"] July 26, 2019, ''[[The Irrawaddy]],'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>
In early 2019, Bangladesh suggested that Myanmar create a safe haven for the Rohingya within its borders, under ASEAN supervision<ref name="bd_wants_safe_zone_2019 Jan 29_unb_com_bd" /> (later expanding that idea to include India, China and Japan among the supervisors).<ref name="india_should_monitor_2019_02_10_the_hindu">[https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/india-should-monitor-safety-of-rohingya/article26231318.ece "'India should monitor safety of Rohingya':  Bangladesh,"]  February 10, 2019, ''[[The Hindu]]'' (India), retrieved February 2019</ref><ref name="myanmar_asean_team 2019_07_26_irrawaddy">[https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-asean-team-visit-rohingyas-camp.html "Myanmar, ASEAN Team to Visit Rohingyas Camp,"] July 26, 2019, ''[[The Irrawaddy]],'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>


In mid-2019, ASEAN was heavily criticized by human rights organizations for a report, which ASEAN commissioned, which turned out to praise Myanmar's work on Rohingya [[repatriation]], while glossing over atrocities and abuses against the Rohingya.<ref name="outcry_asean_report_2019_06_07_dhaka_tribune">[https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/rohingya-crisis/2019/06/08/outcry-as-asean-predicts-smooth-rohingya-return-to-myanmar "Outcry as ASEAN report predicts 'smooth' return of Rohingya to Myanmar,"] June 8, 2019, ''[[Dhaka Tribune]]'' (Bangladesh), retrieved June 2019 (same topic at ''[[Straits Times]]'' [https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/outcry-as-an-asean-report-predicts-smooth-return-of-rohingya-to-myanmar] and ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' [https://www.thejakartapost.com/seasia/2019/06/08/outcry-over-leaked-rohingya-report.html])</ref><ref name="asean_prioritize_2019_06_19_dhaka_tribune" /><ref name="aha_centre_defends_2019_06_10_channelnewsasia">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/aaha-centre-defends-leaked-report-on-rohingya-refugees-11613142 "AHA Centre defends leaked report on Rohingya refugees,"] June 10, 2019, ''[[Channel NewsAsia]]'' (Singapore), retrieved June 2019</ref><ref name="malaysia_rattles_2019_06_22_new_straits_times">[https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/06/498302/malaysia-rattles-asean-summit-demands-justice-rohingya "Malaysia rattles ASEAN summit, demands 'justice' for Rohingya,"] June 22, 2019, [[Agence France-Presse]] in ''[[New Straits Times]]'' (Singapore), (same article at ''[[The Daily Star (Bangladesh)|Daily Star]]'' (Bangladesh) [https://www.thedailystar.net/rohingya-crisis/news/malaysia-calls-justice-and-citizenship-rohingya-muslims-1760779] ), retrieved June 2019</ref><ref name="asean_dont_whitewash_2019_06_19_hrw_org">[https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/06/19/asean-dont-whitewash-atrocities-against-rohingya "ASEAN: Don't Whitewash Atrocities Against Rohingya; Repatriation Report Ignores Dire Situation in Myanmar,"] June 26, 2020, [[Human Rights Watch]], retrieved November 7, 2021</ref>
In mid-2019, ASEAN was heavily criticised by human rights organisations for a report, which ASEAN commissioned, which turned out to praise Myanmar's work on Rohingya [[repatriation]], while glossing over atrocities and abuses against the Rohingya.<ref name="outcry_asean_report_2019_06_07_dhaka_tribune">[https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/rohingya-crisis/2019/06/08/outcry-as-asean-predicts-smooth-rohingya-return-to-myanmar "Outcry as ASEAN report predicts 'smooth' return of Rohingya to Myanmar,"] June 8, 2019, ''[[Dhaka Tribune]]'' (Bangladesh), retrieved June 2019 (same topic at ''[[Straits Times]]'' [https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/outcry-as-an-asean-report-predicts-smooth-return-of-rohingya-to-myanmar] and ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' [https://www.thejakartapost.com/seasia/2019/06/08/outcry-over-leaked-rohingya-report.html])</ref><ref name="asean_prioritize_2019_06_19_dhaka_tribune" /><ref name="aha_centre_defends_2019_06_10_channelnewsasia">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/aaha-centre-defends-leaked-report-on-rohingya-refugees-11613142 "AHA Centre defends leaked report on Rohingya refugees,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210509110301/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/aaha-centre-defends-leaked-report-on-rohingya-refugees-11613142 |date=9 May 2021 }} June 10, 2019, ''[[Channel NewsAsia]]'' (Singapore), retrieved June 2019</ref><ref name="malaysia_rattles_2019_06_22_new_straits_times">[https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/06/498302/malaysia-rattles-asean-summit-demands-justice-rohingya "Malaysia rattles ASEAN summit, demands 'justice' for Rohingya,"] June 22, 2019, [[Agence France-Presse]] in ''[[New Straits Times]]'' (Singapore), (same article at ''[[The Daily Star (Bangladesh)|Daily Star]]'' (Bangladesh) [https://www.thedailystar.net/rohingya-crisis/news/malaysia-calls-justice-and-citizenship-rohingya-muslims-1760779] ), retrieved June 2019</ref><ref name="asean_dont_whitewash_2019_06_19_hrw_org">[https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/06/19/asean-dont-whitewash-atrocities-against-rohingya "ASEAN: Don't Whitewash Atrocities Against Rohingya; Repatriation Report Ignores Dire Situation in Myanmar,"] June 26, 2020, [[Human Rights Watch]], retrieved November 7, 2021</ref>


The June 2019 ASEAN summit was shaken by the Malaysian foreign minister's declaration that persons responsible for the abuses of the Rohingya be prosecuted and punished—conduct unusually undiplomatic at ASEAN summits.<ref name="malaysia_rattles_2019_06_22_new_straits_times" />  ASEAN pressed Myanmar for a firm timeline for the repatriation of Rohingya refugees who fled Myanmar<ref name="seek_time_frame_2019_06_22_kyodo_news">[https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2019/06/cbf10cb092e6-update1-asean-foreign-ministers-seek-time-frame-for-return-of-rohingya.html "ASEAN foreign ministers seek time frame for return of Rohingya,"] June 22, 2019, ''[[Kyodo News]]'' (Japan), retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>—pressuring Myanmar to provide "safety and security for all communities in Rakhine State as effectively as possible and facilitate the voluntary return of displaced persons in a safe, secure and dignified manner."<ref name="asean_leaders_hold_off_2019_06_23_bloomberg">[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-23/asean-leaders-hold-off-from-demanding-citizenship-for-rohingyas "ASEAN Leaders Hold Off From Demanding Citizenship for Rohingyas,"] June 23, 2019, ''[[Bloomberg News]]'' retrieved June 2019</ref>
The June 2019 ASEAN summit was shaken by the Malaysian foreign minister's declaration that persons responsible for the abuses of the Rohingya be prosecuted and punished—conduct unusually undiplomatic at ASEAN summits.<ref name="malaysia_rattles_2019_06_22_new_straits_times" />  ASEAN pressed Myanmar for a firm timeline for the repatriation of Rohingya refugees who fled Myanmar<ref name="seek_time_frame_2019_06_22_kyodo_news">[https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2019/06/cbf10cb092e6-update1-asean-foreign-ministers-seek-time-frame-for-return-of-rohingya.html "ASEAN foreign ministers seek time frame for return of Rohingya,"] June 22, 2019, ''[[Kyodo News]]'' (Japan), retrieved November 6, 2021</ref>—pressuring Myanmar to provide "safety and security for all communities in Rakhine State as effectively as possible and facilitate the voluntary return of displaced persons in a safe, secure and dignified manner."<ref name="asean_leaders_hold_off_2019_06_23_bloomberg">[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-23/asean-leaders-hold-off-from-demanding-citizenship-for-rohingyas "ASEAN Leaders Hold Off From Demanding Citizenship for Rohingyas,"] June 23, 2019, ''[[Bloomberg News]]'' retrieved June 2019</ref>
Line 230: Line 244:
In August 2019, the annual ASEAN Foreign Ministers' meeting concluded with a joint [[communique]] calling on Myanmar's government to guarantee the safety of all Rohingya—both in Myanmar and in exile—and pushed for more dialogue with the refugees about their repatriation to Myanmar. But later that month ASEAN's  Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) supported Myanmar's "efforts" on repatriation, with aid, restraining some members' desire for more intrusive proposals.<ref name="asean_meeting_2019_08_05_jakarta_post ">[https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/08/05/asean-calls-safety-rohingya.html "ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting: ASEAN calls for safety of Rohingya,"] August 5, 2019, ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' retrieved August 2019</ref><ref name="most_asean_members_2019_08_28_irrawaddy ">[https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/asean-members-back-myanmars-repatriation-aid-efforts-rakhine.html "Most ASEAN Members Back Myanmar's Repatriation, Aid Efforts in Rakhine,"] August 28, 2019, ''[[The Irrawaddy]]'' retrieved August 2018</ref>
In August 2019, the annual ASEAN Foreign Ministers' meeting concluded with a joint [[communique]] calling on Myanmar's government to guarantee the safety of all Rohingya—both in Myanmar and in exile—and pushed for more dialogue with the refugees about their repatriation to Myanmar. But later that month ASEAN's  Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) supported Myanmar's "efforts" on repatriation, with aid, restraining some members' desire for more intrusive proposals.<ref name="asean_meeting_2019_08_05_jakarta_post ">[https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/08/05/asean-calls-safety-rohingya.html "ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting: ASEAN calls for safety of Rohingya,"] August 5, 2019, ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' retrieved August 2019</ref><ref name="most_asean_members_2019_08_28_irrawaddy ">[https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/asean-members-back-myanmars-repatriation-aid-efforts-rakhine.html "Most ASEAN Members Back Myanmar's Repatriation, Aid Efforts in Rakhine,"] August 28, 2019, ''[[The Irrawaddy]]'' retrieved August 2018</ref>


By January 2020, ASEAN had made little progress to prepare safe conditions for the Rohingyas' return to Myanmar.<ref name="indonesia_urges_2021_01_22_jakarta_post">[https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/safe-01212021153814.html "Indonesia Urges Myanmar to Create Safe Conditions for Rohingya Repatriation,"]  January 22, 2021, ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post" />
By January 2020, ASEAN had made little progress to prepare safe conditions for the Rohingya's return to Myanmar.<ref name="indonesia_urges_2021_01_22_jakarta_post">[https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/safe-01212021153814.html "Indonesia Urges Myanmar to Create Safe Conditions for Rohingya Repatriation,"]  January 22, 2021, ''[[Jakarta Post]]'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="totally_shameful_2020_06_26_jakarta_post" />
 
-->
==== 2021 Myanmar coup ====
 
On 1 February 2021, the day before a newly elected slate of civilian leaders was to take office in Myanmar, a military junta overthrew Myanmar's civilian government in a [[2021 Myanmar coup d'etat|coup d'etat]], declaring a national [[state of emergency]], imposing [[martial law]], arresting elected civilian leaders, violently clamping down on dissent, and replacing civilian government with the military's appointees.<ref name="military_seizes_power_2021_02_01_thedailystar_net">[https://www.thedailystar.net/asia/news/myanmar-military-seizes-power-detains-elected-leader-aung-san-suu-kyi-2037309 "Myanmar military  seizes power, detains elected leader Aung San Suu Kyi." ] February 1–2, 2021, ''[[Daily Star (Bangladesh)]]'' retrieved February 2021</ref><ref name="asean_leaders_agree_2021_04_25_afp_bangkok_post">[https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2104915/asean-leaders-agree-5-point-plan-for-myanmar "Asean leaders agree 5-point plan for Myanmar,"], ''[[Bangkok Post]]'' with [[Agence France-Presse]], retrieved November 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_indecision_2021_06_15_amnesty_org">[https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2021/06/myanmar-aung-san-suu-kyi-goes-on-trial-asean-indecision-enabling-military-rampage/ "Myanmar: As Aung San Suu Kyi goes on trial, ASEAN's indecision is enabling military rampage,"] 15 June 2021,  [[Amnesty International]], retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters">[https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/tradition-vs-credibility-inside-se-asian-meet-that-snubbed-myanmar-2021-10-19/ "Tradition vs credibility: Inside the SE Asian meet that snubbed Myanmar,"] October 19, 2021, [[Reuters News Service]], retrieved November 8, 2021</ref>
 
Widespread protests and resistance erupted, and elements of the civilian leadership formed an underground "[[National Unity Government of Myanmar|National Unity Government]]" (NUG). Global opposition to the coup emerged, and global pressure was brought on ASEAN to take action.<ref name="un_calls_for_reversal_2021_03_10_ap">[https://apnews.com/article/aung-san-suu-kyi-asia-pacific-myanmar-united-nations-4d0b4e78b8b740784c7ed5adb0aec3b4 "UN calls for reversal of Myanmar coup and condemns violence,"] March 10, 2021, [[Associated Press]], (same article at: [[U.S. News]] [https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2021-03-10/diplomats-un-to-condemn-violence-against-myanmar-protesters] and [[CTV News]] (Canada) [https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/un-calls-for-reversal-of-myanmar-coup-and-condemns-violence-1.5342124]), retrieved March 2021</ref><ref name="un_calls_for_reversal_2021_07_29_ap_abc_news">[https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-urges-council-press-myanmar-return-democracy-79153798 "US urges UN Council to press Myanmar to return to democracy.,"] July 29, 2021, [[Associated Press]], retrieved July 2021</ref><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" /><ref name="aseans_snub_2021_10_20_channelnewsasia">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/asean-myanmar-protest-military-government-nug-sac-min-aung-hlaing-un-2254311 "Commentary: Is ASEAN's snub to Myanmar military the start of a new approach?"] October 20, 2021, [[Channel NewsAsia]], retrieved November 9, 2021</ref><ref name="asean_inflection_2021_08_airuniversity_af_edu">Durst, Charles ([[Eurasia Group]]): [https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/2747515/the-myanmar-coup-as-an-asean-inflection-point/ "The Myanmar Coup as an ASEAN Inflection Point"] August 2021 (Special Issue), ''[[Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs]],'' [[Air University (United States Air Force)|Air University]], (also print edition PDF at: [https://media.defense.gov/2021/Aug/26/2002840264/-1/-1/1/DUNST.PDF]), retrieved November 9, 2021</ref>


====2021 Myanmar coup====
On 1 February 2021, the day before a newly elected slate of civilian leaders was to take office in Myanmar, a military junta overthrew Myanmar's civilian government in a [[2021 Myanmar coup d'état|coup d'etat]], declaring a national [[state of emergency]], imposing [[martial law]], arresting elected civilian leaders, violently clamping down on dissent, and replacing civilian government with the military's appointees. Widespread protests and resistance erupted, and elements of the civilian leadership formed an underground "[[National Unity Government of Myanmar|National Unity Government]]" (NUG). Global opposition to the coup emerged, and global pressure was brought on ASEAN to take action.<ref name="un_calls_for_reversal_2021_03_10_ap">[https://apnews.com/article/aung-san-suu-kyi-asia-pacific-myanmar-united-nations-4d0b4e78b8b740784c7ed5adb0aec3b4 "UN calls for reversal of Myanmar coup and condemns violence,"] 10 March 2021, [[Associated Press]], (same article at: [[U.S. News]] [https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2021-03-10/diplomats-un-to-condemn-violence-against-myanmar-protesters] and [[CTV News]] (Canada) [https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/article/un-calls-for-reversal-of-myanmar-coup-and-condemns-violence/]), retrieved March 2021</ref><ref name="un_calls_for_reversal_2021_07_29_ap_abc_news">[https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-urges-council-press-myanmar-return-democracy-79153798 "US urges UN Council to press Myanmar to return to democracy.,"] 29 July 2021, [[Associated Press]], retrieved July 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_snub_2021_10_20_channelnewsasia">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/asean-myanmar-protest-military-government-nug-sac-min-aung-hlaing-un-2254311 "Commentary: Is ASEAN's snub to Myanmar military the start of a new approach?"] 20 October 2021, [[Channel NewsAsia]], retrieved 9 November 2021</ref><ref name="asean_inflection_2021_08_airuniversity_af_edu">Durst, Charles ([[Eurasia Group]]): [https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/2747515/the-myanmar-coup-as-an-asean-inflection-point/ "The Myanmar Coup as an ASEAN Inflection Point"] August 2021 (Special Issue), ''[[Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs]],'' [[Air University (United States Air Force)|Air University]], (also print edition PDF at: [https://media.defense.gov/2021/Aug/26/2002840264/-1/-1/1/DUNST.PDF]), retrieved 9 November 2021</ref><!--
Initially, ASEAN remained detached from the controversy, though Muslim-dominated members (mostly democracies, already vocal against the Rohingya genocide) expressed strong objection to the coup, while the mostly-Buddhist authoritarian members of ASEAN remained quiet.<ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" /><ref name="myanmar_crisis_2021_03_04_asia_times" /><ref name="myanmar_coup_asean_split_2021_03_29_dw_com" />
Initially, ASEAN remained detached from the controversy, though Muslim-dominated members (mostly democracies, already vocal against the Rohingya genocide) expressed strong objection to the coup, while the mostly-Buddhist authoritarian members of ASEAN remained quiet.<ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" /><ref name="myanmar_crisis_2021_03_04_asia_times" /><ref name="myanmar_coup_asean_split_2021_03_29_dw_com" />


Line 247: Line 258:
*A visit to Myanmar, by the special envoy and delegation, to meet with all parties concerned.
*A visit to Myanmar, by the special envoy and delegation, to meet with all parties concerned.


The ASEAN agreement with Myanmar drew strong criticism from over 150 human rights organizations for its lax approach,<ref name="statement_on_myanmar_2021_05_05_hrw_org">[https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/05/05/global-civil-society-statement-myanmar "Global Civil Society Statement on Myanmar; Call for Arms Embargo on Myanmar,"], May 5, 2021, [[Human Rights Watch]] and 150 other organizations, jointly, including: [[Amnesty International]], [[Fortify Rights]], [[ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights]], [[International Council of Jurists]], and the [[World Council of Churches]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_indecision_2021_06_15_amnesty_org" /> yet the Myanmar junta did not comply with any of the points of the plan.<ref name="aseans_indecision_2021_06_15_amnesty_org" /><ref name="us_urges_un_council_2021_07_29_ap_abc_news">[https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-urges-council-press-myanmar-return-democracy-79153798 "US urges UN Council to press Myanmar to return to democracy,"] July 29, 2021, [[Associated Press]] / [[ABC News]], retrieved July 2021</ref><ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc">[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58938489 "Myanmar army general Min Aung Hlaing excluded from leaders' summit,"] October 16, 2021, [[BBC News]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" />
The ASEAN agreement with Myanmar drew strong criticism from over 150 human rights organisations for its lax approach,<ref name="statement_on_myanmar_2021_05_05_hrw_org">[https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/05/05/global-civil-society-statement-myanmar "Global Civil Society Statement on Myanmar; Call for Arms Embargo on Myanmar,"], May 5, 2021, [[Human Rights Watch]] and 150 other organisations, jointly, including: [[Amnesty International]], [[Fortify Rights]], [[ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights]], [[International Council of Jurists]], and the [[World Council of Churches]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_indecision_2021_06_15_amnesty_org" /> yet the Myanmar junta did not comply with any of the points of the plan.<ref name="aseans_indecision_2021_06_15_amnesty_org" /><ref name="us_urges_un_council_2021_07_29_ap_abc_news">[https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-urges-council-press-myanmar-return-democracy-79153798 "US urges UN Council to press Myanmar to return to democracy,"] July 29, 2021, [[Associated Press]] / [[ABC News]], retrieved July 2021</ref><ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc">[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58938489 "Myanmar army general Min Aung Hlaing excluded from leaders' summit,"] October 16, 2021, [[BBC News]], retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" />


On 18 June 2021, the [[United Nations General Assembly]] (UNGA) — in a rare move, with a nearly unanimous resolution — condemned Myanmar's coup, and called for an [[arms embargo]] against the country. The UNGA consulted with ASEAN and integrated most of ASEAN's 5-point consensus into the resolution (adding demands that the junta release all political prisoners). But, while Communist Vietnam voted "yes," along with the ASEAN democracies (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines), most authoritarian ASEAN states (Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Brunei) abstained.<ref name="un_assembly_condemns_2021_06_18_apnews">[https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-general-assembly-united-nations-myanmar-business-global-trade-72dbb95927b735de2b83dc1a85abdd72 "UN assembly condemns Myanmar coup, calls for arms embargo,"] June 18, 2021, [[Associated Press]] retrieved June 2021</ref><ref name="resolution_75_287_unga_2021_06_18_undocs_org">[https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/75/287 "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 June 2021: 75/287. The situation in Myanmar"],  June 18, 2021,  ''[[United Nations General Assembly]]'' retrieved June 2021</ref>
On 18 June 2021, the [[United Nations General Assembly]] (UNGA)—in a rare move, with a nearly unanimous resolution—condemned Myanmar's coup, and called for an [[arms embargo]] against the country. The UNGA consulted with ASEAN and integrated most of ASEAN's 5-point consensus into the resolution (adding demands that the junta release all political prisoners). But, while Communist Vietnam voted "yes," along with the ASEAN democracies (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines), most authoritarian ASEAN states (Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Brunei) abstained.<ref name="un_assembly_condemns_2021_06_18_apnews">[https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-general-assembly-united-nations-myanmar-business-global-trade-72dbb95927b735de2b83dc1a85abdd72 "UN assembly condemns Myanmar coup, calls for arms embargo,"] June 18, 2021, [[Associated Press]] retrieved June 2021</ref><ref name="resolution_75_287_unga_2021_06_18_undocs_org">[https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/75/287 "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 June 2021: 75/287. The situation in Myanmar"],  June 18, 2021,  ''[[United Nations General Assembly]]'' retrieved June 2021</ref>


In October 2021, despite its consensus agreement with ASEAN, Myanmar's junta refused to allow ASEAN representatives to speak with Myanmar's deposed and imprisoned civilian leader [[Aung San Suu Kyi]].<ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc" /><ref name="junta_rebuffs_2021_10_04_irrawaddy">[https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-junta-rebuffs-asean-request-to-meet-suu-kyi.html "Myanmar Junta Rebuffs ASEAN Request to Meet Suu Kyi,"], October 4, 2021, ''[[The Irrawaddy]]'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" />
In October 2021, despite its consensus agreement with ASEAN, Myanmar's junta refused to allow ASEAN representatives to speak with Myanmar's deposed and imprisoned civilian leader [[Aung San Suu Kyi]].<ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc" /><ref name="junta_rebuffs_2021_10_04_irrawaddy">[https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-junta-rebuffs-asean-request-to-meet-suu-kyi.html "Myanmar Junta Rebuffs ASEAN Request to Meet Suu Kyi,"], October 4, 2021, ''[[The Irrawaddy]]'' retrieved November 6, 2021</ref><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" />


Following lobbying by the [[United Nations]], [[United States of America|United States]], [[European Union]], [[United Kingdom]], and other nations, ASEAN declined to invite Myanmar's Gen. Hlaing to represent Myanmar at ASEAN's October 2021 summit — the first time in ASEAN's history that it did not invite a political leader from a member nation to one of its summits. Nor did ASEAN invite a representative of Myanmar's underground National Unity Government, saying it would consider inviting a non-political representative of the country, instead, (though none was actually invited).<ref name="us_urges_un_council_2021_07_29_ap_abc_news" /><ref name="asean_to_exclude_2021_10_15_apnews">[https://apnews.com/article/business-asia-myanmar-global-trade-southeast-asia-020da6ef264d3a95c1cbffaa020cda59 "ASEAN to exclude Myanmar's leader from summit in key rebuke,"], October 15, 2021, ''[[Associated Press]]'' (same article at ''[[Globe and Mail]]'' (Canada) [https://apnews.com/article/business-asia-myanmar-global-trade-southeast-asia-020da6ef264d3a95c1cbffaa020cda59]), retrieved October 2021</ref><ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc" /><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" /><ref name="can_asean_overcome_2021_11_01_nikkei_asia">Robinson, Gwen: [https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Comment/Can-ASEAN-overcome-the-Myanmar-curse "Can ASEAN overcome the 'Myanmar curse'?:  Regional grouping struggles with changing dynamics due to 'pariah' member,"] November 1, 2021, ''[[Nikkei Asia]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_snub_2021_10_20_channelnewsasia" />
Following lobbying by the [[United Nations]], [[United States of America|United States]], [[European Union]], [[United Kingdom]], and other nations, ASEAN declined to invite Myanmar's Gen. Hlaing to represent Myanmar at ASEAN's October 2021 summit—the first time in ASEAN's history that it did not invite a political leader from a member nation to one of its summits. Nor did ASEAN invite a representative of Myanmar's underground National Unity Government, saying it would consider inviting a non-political representative of the country, instead, (though none was actually invited).<ref name="us_urges_un_council_2021_07_29_ap_abc_news" /><ref name="asean_to_exclude_2021_10_15_apnews">[https://apnews.com/article/business-asia-myanmar-global-trade-southeast-asia-020da6ef264d3a95c1cbffaa020cda59 "ASEAN to exclude Myanmar's leader from summit in key rebuke,"], October 15, 2021, ''[[Associated Press]]'' (same article at ''[[Globe and Mail]]'' (Canada) [https://apnews.com/article/business-asia-myanmar-global-trade-southeast-asia-020da6ef264d3a95c1cbffaa020cda59]), retrieved October 2021</ref><ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc" /><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" /><ref name="can_asean_overcome_2021_11_01_nikkei_asia">Robinson, Gwen: [https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Comment/Can-ASEAN-overcome-the-Myanmar-curse "Can ASEAN overcome the 'Myanmar curse'?:  Regional grouping struggles with changing dynamics due to 'pariah' member,"] November 1, 2021, ''[[Nikkei Asia]],'' retrieved November 7, 2021</ref><ref name="aseans_snub_2021_10_20_channelnewsasia" />


The unusual ASEAN action was widely seen as a major setback for the Myanmar junta's attempt to achieve global recognition as the legitimate government of Myanmar,<ref name="why_aseans_rebuke_2021_10_21_iiss_org" /><ref name="asean_to_exclude_2021_10_15_apnews" /><ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc" /><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" /> and a sign of broader change in the behavior and role of ASEAN.<ref name="asean_pushes_boundaries_2021_04_26_reuters" /><ref name="why_aseans_rebuke_2021_10_21_iiss_org" /><ref name="sign_of_change_2021_10_20_asialink" /><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" />
The unusual ASEAN action was widely seen as a major setback for the Myanmar junta's attempt to achieve global recognition as the legitimate government of Myanmar,<ref name="why_aseans_rebuke_2021_10_21_iiss_org" /><ref name="asean_to_exclude_2021_10_15_apnews" /><ref name="hlaing_excluded_2021_10_16_bbc" /><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" /> and a sign of broader change in the behavior and role of ASEAN.<ref name="asean_pushes_boundaries_2021_04_26_reuters" /><ref name="why_aseans_rebuke_2021_10_21_iiss_org" /><ref name="sign_of_change_2021_10_20_asialink" /><ref name="tradition_vs_credibility_2021_10_19_reuters" />
 
-->
=== South China Sea disputes ===
{{Main articles|Territorial disputes in the South China Sea}}
With perceptions that there have been [[Territorial disputes in the South China Sea|multiple incursions]] into the [[South China Sea]] by the PRC (China) and ROC (Taiwan), with land, islands and resources all having had previous overlapping claims between [[Vietnam]], [[Philippines]], [[Malaysia]], [[Brunei]], [[Indonesia]], and various other countries, the PRC and ROC's claim into the region is seen as intrusive by many Southeast Asian countries as of 2022, potentially a reflection of the threat of [[Chinese expansionism]] into the region.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea |url=https://cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea |access-date=2022-07-25 |website=Global Conflict Tracker |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Stiffening the ASEAN spine in the South China Sea |url=https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/stiffening-asean-spine-south-china-sea |access-date=2022-07-25 |website=www.lowyinstitute.org |language=en}}</ref> This follows the infamous 11 dash line that was produced by the [[Republic of China]] (ROC, [[Taiwan]]), followed by the infamous [[Nine-dash line|9-dash line]] by the [[China|People's Republic of China]] (PRC). ASEAN sought for a more unified response against what it perceived to be Chinese penetration and hegemony into the region. There have been attempts to counterbalance this sway by attempting to align with other military alliances such as the nations in the [[Quadrilateral Security Dialogue]] (QUAD).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://media.defense.gov/2020/Aug/31/2002488087/-1/-1/1/BURGESS.PDF|title=Confronting China's Maritime Expansion in the South China Sea|author=Dr. Stephen byurgess|website=Media.defense.gov|access-date=28 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200916174929/https://media.defense.gov/2020/Aug/31/2002488087/-1/-1/1/BURGESS.PDF|archive-date=16 September 2020|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
Both the PRC (China) and the ROC (Taiwan) have employed several strategies in an attempt to wrestle hold of South China Sea islands, such as the [[Chinese salami slicing strategy|salami slicing strategy]] and [[cabbage tactics]] from the PRC. There has also been calls to end the ROC (Taiwan)'s illegal military actions in the South China Sea, especially on [[Taiping Island]] (Itu Aba), which is referred to the East Sea in Vietnamese.<ref>{{Cite web |last=VietnamPlus |title=Vietnam demands Taiwan to end illegal actions in East Sea {{!}} Politics {{!}} Vietnam+ (VietnamPlus) |url=https://en.vietnamplus.vn/vietnam-demands-taiwan-to-end-illegal-actions-in-east-sea/215733.vnp |access-date=2022-08-09 |website=VietnamPlus |language=en}}</ref> Additionally, China passed a law in January 2021 allowing [[China Coast Guard|its coast guard]] to fire on foreign vessels, causing greater concern amongst ASEAN states.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Philippines seeks US help as it vows to ignore China maritime law |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/10/dutertes-defence-chief-says-manila-got-less-from-us-pact |access-date=2022-08-09 |website=www.aljazeera.com |language=en}}</ref> It is considered that the [[Chams|Cham people]], an [[Austronesian people]] indigenous to Central and South Vietnam, were the "ancient rulers of the South China Sea", having had conducted extensive trade and maritime routes throughout the Southeast Asian region.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Cham: Descendants of Ancient Rulers of South China Sea Watch Maritime Dispute From Sidelines |url=https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/140616-south-china-sea-vietnam-china-cambodia-champa |access-date=2022-07-25 |website=Science |language=en}}</ref>


==Member states==
==Member states==
{{main|Member states of ASEAN}}
{{main|Member states of ASEAN}}
[[File:Map of ASEAN member states.svg|550px|thumb|Map showing the member states of ASEAN.]]
 
[[File:Map of ASEAN member states.svg|380x380px|thumb|Map showing the member states of ASEAN]]
{{Supranational Asian Bodies|align=right|size=380px}}


===List of member states{{Anchor|Details of member states}}===
===List of member states{{Anchor|Details of member states}}===
{| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"; white-space: nowrap;"
{| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders" ; "white-space: nowrap;"
! scope="col" | [[Member states of ASEAN|State]]
! scope="col" | [[Member states of ASEAN|State]]
! scope="col" | Accession<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/association-southeast-asian-nations-asean/|title=Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)|access-date=2017-08-19|newspaper=[[Nuclear Threat Initiative]]}}</ref>
! scope="col" | Accession<ref>{{Cite web |title=ASEAN Member States|url=https://asean.org/member-states/ |access-date=2025-10-26 |website=asean.org}}</ref>
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|BRN}} [[Brunei]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|BRN}} [[Brunei Darussalam]]
| align=right| 7 January 1984
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1984-01-07}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|CAM}} [[Cambodia]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|KHM}} [[Cambodia]]
| align=right| 30 April 1999
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1999-04-30}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|IDN}} [[Indonesia]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|IDN}} [[Indonesia]]
| align=right| 8 August 1967
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1967-08-08}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|LAO}} [[Laos]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|LAO}} [[Laos]]
| align=right| 23 July 1997
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1997-07-23}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|MAS}} [[Malaysia]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|MAS}} [[Malaysia]]
| align=right| 8 August 1967
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1967-08-08}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|MYA}} [[Myanmar]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|MMR}} [[Myanmar]]
| align=right| 23 July 1997
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1997-07-23}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|PHL}} [[Philippines]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|PHL}} [[Philippines]]
| align=right| 8 August 1967
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1967-08-08}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|SGP}} [[Singapore]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|SGP}} [[Singapore]]
| align=right| 8 August 1967
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1967-08-08}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|THA}} [[Thailand]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|THA}} [[Thailand]]
| align=right| 8 August 1967
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1967-08-08}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|VIE}} [[Vietnam]]
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|TLS}} [[Timor-Leste]]
| align=right| 28 July 1995
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|2025-10-26}}
|-
|-
! scope="row" | {{flagicon|VNM}} [[Vietnam]]
| align="right" | {{Date table sorting|1995-07-28}}
|}
|}


===Observers===
=== Observer states ===
{{main|Enlargement of ASEAN}}  
{{Main|Enlargement of ASEAN}}
There are currently two states seeking accession to ASEAN: [[Papua New Guinea]]<ref name="PNGPHIL">{{cite web|url=http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/154860/news/nation/papua-new-guinea-asks-rp-support-for-asean-membership-bid|title=Papua New Guinea asks RP support for Asean membership bid|access-date=26 January 2013|publisher=[[GMA News and Public Affairs]]}}</ref><ref>[http://www.op.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22879&Itemid=2 Somare seeks PGMA's support for PNG's ASEAN membership bid] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100306192700/http://www.op.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22879&Itemid=2 }} Retrieved 8 July 2009</ref> and [[East Timor]].<ref name="East Timor">[http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/east-timor-asean-bid/2006/07/22/1153166635002.html East Timor ASEAN Bid] Retrieved 28 July 2006</ref>  
 
*[[Accession of Papua New Guinea to ASEAN]] (observer status since 1976)  
There is currently one state seeking accession to ASEAN: [[Papua New Guinea]].<ref name="PNGPHIL">{{cite web|url=http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/154860/news/nation/papua-new-guinea-asks-rp-support-for-asean-membership-bid|title=Papua New Guinea asks RP support for Asean membership bid|date=30 March 2009|access-date=26 January 2013|publisher=[[GMA News and Public Affairs]]}}</ref><ref>[http://www.op.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22879&Itemid=2 Somare seeks PGMA's support for PNG's ASEAN membership bid] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100306192700/http://www.op.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22879&Itemid=2 |date=6 March 2010 }} Retrieved 8 July 2009</ref>
*[[Accession of East Timor to ASEAN]] (since 2002, observer status since 2022<ref>{{cite web |last1=ASEAN |title=ASEAN Leaders' Statement on the Application of Timor-Leste for ASEAN Membership |url=https://asean.org/asean-leaders-statement-on-the-application-of-timor-leste-for-asean-membership |website=ASEAN |access-date=14 November 2022}}</ref>)
 
* [[Accession of Papua New Guinea to ASEAN]] (observer status since 1976)
There are two states seeking for observer status in ASEAN; [[Fiji]] and [[Bangladesh]].<ref name="ultimate">{{Cite web |date=2025-04-05 |title=Ultimate goal is to join ASEAN as a full member |url=https://today.thefinancialexpress.com.bd/trade-market/ultimate-goal-is-to-join-asean-as-a-full-member-1743783067 |access-date=2025-07-12 |website=The Financial Express |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-09-05 |title=Will Bangladesh join Asean? Maritime arbitration wins favour Dhaka |url=https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3277348/will-bangladesh-join-asean-maritime-arbitration-wins-and-cultural-links-favour-dhaka |access-date=2025-07-17 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref>
* [[Enlargement of ASEAN#Fiji|Accession of Fiji to ASEAN]].<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Fiji's Foreign Policy White Paper |url=https://www.foreignaffairs.gov.fj/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/FFPWP.pdf |journal=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Fiji}}</ref>
* [[Accession of Bangladesh to ASEAN]] (attempting to gain observer status, with the goal towards full membership.)<ref name="ultimate" />
There was also one state that had formally pursued accession to ASEAN but later stopped, which was [[Sri Lanka]].
* [[Accession of Sri Lanka to ASEAN]] (invited as one of the founders of ASEAN;<ref>{{Cite web |last=Suryanarayan |first=V. |date=2022-10-18 |title=The myth and reality of ASEAN unity |url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2022/Oct/17/the-myth-and-reality-of-asean-unity-2509184.html |access-date=2024-05-13 |website=The New Indian Express |language=en}}</ref> 1981 accession attempt; both rejected by [[Singapore]]<ref>{{Cite web |last=De Silva |first=Mervyn |date=1981 |title=Sri Lanka: ASEAN Operation |url=http://www.srilankaguardian.org/2020/10/sri-lanka-asean-operation.html |access-date=2024-05-13 |website=[[India Today]] |via=Sri Lanka Guardian}}</ref>)


== Demographics ==
=== Dialogue partners ===
* [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[China]], [[European Union]], [[India]], [[Japan]], [[New Zealand]], [[Russia]], [[South Korea]], [[United Kingdom]] and [[United States]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://asean.org/our-communities/asean-political-security-community/outward-looking-community/external-relations/|title=ASEAN External relations}}</ref>


{{as of|2019|July|1}}, the population of the ASEAN was about 655&nbsp;million people (8.5% of the world population).<ref name="population">{{cite web|url=https://www.aseanstats.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ASYB_2020.pdf|title=ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2020|access-date=20 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.aseanstats.org/publication/asyb_2020/|title=ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2020|access-date=20 January 2021}}</ref> In 2019, 55.2 million children were age 0-4 and 46.3 million were older than 65 in the ASEAN. This corresponds to 8.4% and 7.1% of the total ASEAN population. The region's population growth is 1.1% per year with [[Thailand]] being the smallest at 0.2% per year, and [[Cambodia]] being the largest at 1.9% per year. ASEAN's sex ratio is 99.6, with 326.4 million males and 327.8 million females.{{Clarify}}
=== Sectoral Dialogue partners ===
* [[Brazil]], [[Morocco]], [[Norway]], [[Pakistan]], [[South Africa]], [[Switzerland]], [[Turkey]] and [[United Arab Emirates]].


== The ASEAN Way ==
=== Development partners ===
The "ASEAN Way" refers to a methodology or approach to solving issues that respect Southeast Asia's cultural norms. Masilamani and Peterson summarise it as "a working process or style that is informal and personal. Policymakers constantly utilise compromise, consensus, and consultation in the informal decision-making process... it above all prioritises a consensus-based, non-conflictual way of addressing problems. Quiet diplomacy allows ASEAN leaders to communicate without bringing the discussions into the public view. Members avoid the embarrassment that may lead to further conflict."<ref name="Masilamani">{{cite journal|last1=Masilamani|first1=Logan|last2=Peterson|first2=Jimmy|title=The "ASEAN Way": The Structural Underpinnings of Constructive Engagement|journal=Foreign Policy Journal|url=http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2014/10/15/the-asean-way-the-structural-underpinnings-of-constructive-engagement/|access-date=12 May 2015|archive-date=13 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150513043858/http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2014/10/15/the-asean-way-the-structural-underpinnings-of-constructive-engagement/|url-status=live}}</ref> It has been said that the merits of the ASEAN Way might "be usefully applied to global conflict management".
* [[Chile]], [[France]], [[Germany]], [[Italy]], [[Netherlands]] and [[Peru]].
However, critics have argued that such an approach can be only applied to Asian countries, to specific cultural norms and understandings notably, due to a difference in mindset and level of tension.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Goh|first1=Gillian|url=http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjeaa/journal3/geasia1.pdf|title=The 'ASEAN Way'; Non-Intervention and ASEAN's Role in Conflict Management|journal=Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs|pages=113–18|volume=3|issue=1|access-date=2 March 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626113326/http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjeaa/journal3/geasia1.pdf|archive-date=26 June 2013}}</ref>{{RP|pp113-118}}


Critics object, claiming that the ASEAN Way's emphasis on consultation, consensus, and non-interference forces the organisation to adopt only those policies which satisfy the lowest common denominator. Decision-making by consensus requires members to see eye-to-eye before ASEAN can move forward on an issue. Members may not have a common conception of the meaning of the ASEAN Way. Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos emphasize non-interference while older member countries focus on co-operation and co-ordination. These differences hinder efforts to find common solutions to particular issues, but also make it difficult to determine when collective action is appropriate in a given situation.<ref name=Leviter>{{cite journal|last1=Leviter|first1=Lee|title=The ASEAN Charter: ASEAN Failure or Member Failure?|journal=New York University Journal of International Law and Politics|volume=43|pages=159–210}}</ref>{{RP|161–163}}
==The ASEAN Way==
The ''ASEAN Way'' refers to a methodology or approach to solving issues that respect Southeast Asia's cultural norms. Masilamani and Peterson summarise it as:<ref name="Masilamani">{{cite journal|last1=Masilamani|first1=Logan|last2=Peterson|first2=Jimmy|title=The "ASEAN Way": The Structural Underpinnings of Constructive Engagement|journal=Foreign Policy Journal|date=15 October 2014|url=http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2014/10/15/the-asean-way-the-structural-underpinnings-of-constructive-engagement/|access-date=12 May 2015|archive-date=13 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150513043858/http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2014/10/15/the-asean-way-the-structural-underpinnings-of-constructive-engagement/|url-status=live}}</ref><blockquote>A working process or style that is informal and personal. Policymakers constantly utilise compromise, consensus, and consultation in the informal decision-making process... it above all prioritises a consensus-based, non-conflictual way of addressing problems. Quiet diplomacy allows ASEAN leaders to communicate without bringing the discussions into the public view. Members avoid the embarrassment that may lead to further conflict. </blockquote>It has been said that the merits of the ASEAN Way might "be usefully applied to global conflict management". However, critics have argued that such an approach can be only applied to Asian countries, to specific cultural norms and understandings notably, due to a difference in mindset and level of tension.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Goh|first1=Gillian|url=http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjeaa/journal3/geasia1.pdf|title=The 'ASEAN Way'; Non-Intervention and ASEAN's Role in Conflict Management|journal=Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs|pages=113–18|volume=3|issue=1|date=Spring 2003|access-date=2 March 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626113326/http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjeaa/journal3/geasia1.pdf|archive-date=26 June 2013}}</ref>{{RP|pp113-118}} Critics object, claiming that the ASEAN Way's emphasis on consultation, consensus, and non-interference forces the organisation to adopt only those policies which satisfy the lowest common denominator. Decision-making by consensus requires members to see eye-to-eye before ASEAN can move forward on an issue. Members may not have a common conception of the meaning of the ASEAN Way. Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos emphasise non-interference while older member countries focus on co-operation and co-ordination. These differences hinder efforts to find common solutions to particular issues, but also make it difficult to determine when collective action is appropriate in a given situation.<ref name="Leviter">{{cite journal|last1=Leviter|first1=Lee|title=The ASEAN Charter: ASEAN Failure or Member Failure?|journal=New York University Journal of International Law and Politics|date=2010|volume=43|pages=159–210}}</ref>{{RP|161–163}}


==Structure==
==Structure==
Beginning in 1997, heads of each member state adopted the ASEAN Vision 2020 during the group's 30th anniversary meeting held in Kuala Lumpur. As a means for the realisation of a single ASEAN community, this vision provides provisions on peace and stability, a nuclear-free region, closer economic integration, human development, sustainable development, cultural heritage, being a drug-free region, environment among others. The vision also aimed to "see an outward-looking ASEAN playing a pivotal role in the international fora, and advancing ASEAN's common interests".<ref>[http://www.asean.org/news/item/asean-vision-2020 "ASEAN Vision 2020"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429050655/http://www.asean.org/news/item/asean-vision-2020 }} 15 December 1997. Retrieved 10 December 2014.</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=A united region: The ASEAN Community 2015|url=http://www.rappler.com/world/specials/southeast-asia/asean-journey/47239-asean-community-2015-overview|author1=Julio Amador|author2=Joycee A. Teodoro|work=Rappler|access-date=17 June 2015|archive-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510023020/http://www.rappler.com/world/specials/southeast-asia/asean-journey/47239-asean-community-2015-overview|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[File:ASEAN_HQ_1.jpg|thumb|The [[ASEAN Headquarters]] in [[South Jakarta]], Indonesia.]]
Beginning in 1997, heads of each member state adopted the ASEAN Vision 2020 during the group's 30th anniversary meeting held in [[Kuala Lumpur]]. As a means for the realisation of a single ASEAN community, this vision provides provisions on peace and stability, a nuclear-free region, closer economic integration, human development, sustainable development, cultural heritage, being a drug-free region, environment among others. The vision also aimed to "see an outward-looking ASEAN playing a pivotal role in the international fora, and advancing ASEAN's common interests".<ref>[http://www.asean.org/news/item/asean-vision-2020 "ASEAN Vision 2020"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429050655/http://www.asean.org/news/item/asean-vision-2020 |date=29 April 2015}} 15 December 1997. Retrieved 10 December 2014.</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=A united region: The ASEAN Community 2015|url=http://www.rappler.com/world/specials/southeast-asia/asean-journey/47239-asean-community-2015-overview|author1=Julio Amador|author2=Joycee A. Teodoro|work=Rappler|date=2 May 2014|access-date=17 June 2015|archive-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510023020/http://www.rappler.com/world/specials/southeast-asia/asean-journey/47239-asean-community-2015-overview|url-status=live}}</ref>


ASEAN Vision 2020 was formalised and made comprehensive through the Bali Concord II in 2003. Three major pillars of a single ASEAN community were established: Political-Security Community (APSC), Economic Community (AEC) and Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/news/item/declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii|title=Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II)|publisher=ASEAN|access-date=17 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702050633/http://www.asean.org/news/item/declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii|archive-date=2 July 2015}}</ref><ref name="Overview">{{cite web|title=Overview|url=http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview|website=ASEAN|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-date=17 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150217005044/http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="APSC-FS">{{cite book|title=Fact Sheet ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC)|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-7643-49-9|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20APSC.pdf|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20APSC.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref><ref name="AEC-FS">{{cite book|title=Fact Sheet ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-7643-50-5|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20AEC.pdf|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20AEC.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref><ref name="ASCC-FS">{{cite book|title=Fact Sheet of ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC)|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-7643-51-2|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20ASCC.pdf|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20ASCC.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref> To fully embody the three pillars as part of the 2015 integration, blueprints for APSC and ASCC were subsequently adopted in 2009 in [[Cha-am]], Thailand.<ref>{{cite book|title=Towards A Sustainable Asia: Environment and Climate Change|author=The Association of Academies of Sciences in Asia|location=Beijing|publisher=Science Press}}</ref> The ASEAN Community, initially planned to commence by 2020, was accelerated to begin by 31 December 2015.<ref>{{cite web|title=TODAY Online - Countries must work together to deal with shared problems: PM Lee|url=http://www.gov.sg/news/content/today-online-countries-must-work-together-to-deal-with-shared-problems-pm-lee|website=Government of Singapore|access-date=25 November 2015|archive-date=26 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151126041217/http://www.gov.sg/news/content/today-online-countries-must-work-together-to-deal-with-shared-problems-pm-lee|url-status=live}}</ref> It was decided during the 12th ASEAN Summit in [[Cebu]] in 2007.<ref>{{cite web|title=Cebu declaration on the acceleration of the establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015|url=http://www.asean.org/component/zoo/item/about-asean-overview-cebu-declaration-on-the-acceleration-of-the-establishment-of-an-asean-community-by-2015?Itemid=185|access-date=17 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150617102112/http://www.asean.org/component/zoo/item/about-asean-overview-cebu-declaration-on-the-acceleration-of-the-establishment-of-an-asean-community-by-2015?Itemid=185|archive-date=17 June 2015}}</ref>
ASEAN Vision 2020 was formalised and made comprehensive through the Bali Concord II in 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/news/item/declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii|title=Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II)|publisher=ASEAN|access-date=17 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702050633/http://www.asean.org/news/item/declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii|archive-date=2 July 2015}}</ref>


At the 23rd ASEAN Summit in November 2013, leaders decided to develop a post-2015 Vision and created the High-Level Task Force (HLTF) that consists of ten high-level representatives from all member states. The Vision was adopted at the 27th Summit in November 2015 in Kuala Lumpur. The ASEAN community would revise and renew its vision every ten years to provide a framework for continuous development and further integration.
Three major pillars of a single ASEAN community were established:<ref name="Overview">{{cite web|title=About ASEAN|url=https://asean.org/about-asean|work=ASEAN|access-date=26 October 2025|archive-date=16 May 2025|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250516114344/https://asean.org/web/20250516114344/https://asean.org/about-asean|url-status=live}}</ref>


The terms in the post-2015 Vision are divided into four subcategories, namely APSC, AEC, ASCC, and Moving Forward. APSC issues are covered under articles 7 and 8. The former generally states the community's overall aspiration to aim for a united, inclusive and resilient community. It also puts human and environmental security as crucial points. Deepening engagement with both internal and external parties are also stressed to contribute to international peace, security and stability.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN COMMUNITY VISION 2025|url=http://www.asean.org/storage/images/2015/November/aec-page/ASEAN-Community-Vision-2025.pdf|access-date=24 September 2016|archive-date=10 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161010184551/http://www.asean.org/storage/images/2015/November/aec-page/ASEAN-Community-Vision-2025.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> The "Moving Forward" subcategory implies the acknowledgement of weaknesses of the institution's capacity to process and coordinate ASEAN work. Strengthening ASEAN Secretariat and other ASEAN organs and bodies is therefore desired. There is also a call for a higher level of ASEAN institutional presence at the national, regional and international levels.{{citation needed}}
* Political-Security Community (APSC)<ref name="APSC-FS">{{cite book|title=Fact Sheet ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC)|date=Jun 2013|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-7643-49-9|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20APSC.pdf|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20APSC.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref>
* Economic Community (AEC)<ref name="AEC-FS">{{cite book|title=Fact Sheet ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)|date=Jun 2013|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-7643-50-5|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20AEC.pdf|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20AEC.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref>
* Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC)<ref name="ASCC-FS">{{cite book|title=Fact Sheet of ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC)|date=Jun 2013|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-7643-51-2|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20ASCC.pdf|access-date=15 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/factsheet/2013%20(6.%20Jun)%20-%20ASCC.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref>


Additionally, ASEAN institutional weakness has been further amplified by the ineffectiveness of its initiatives in fighting against COVID-19. ASEAN has been making painstaking efforts to combat the pandemic by establishing both intra and extra-regional ad hoc agencies such as theASEAN-China Ad-Hoc Health Ministers Joint Task Force, the Special ASEAN Summit on the COVID-19, COVID-19 ASEAN Response Fund, and the Special ASEAN Plus Three Summit on COVID-19. These mechanisms aim to facilitate senior discussions among regional actors on how to contain the pandemic's spread and reduce its negative impacts. However, their practical implementations are still insignificant when the cooperation among member states is insubstantial, as illustrated by the polarisation of their COVID-19 policies and the high number of cases and deaths in the region.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Phuong|first=Pham|title=COVID-19 has revealed ASEAN's institutional weaknesses|work=Global-is-asian|publisher=Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore|url=https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/gia/article/covid-19-has-revealed-asean-s-institutional-weaknesses|url-status=live|access-date=10 September 2020|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053214/https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/gia/article/covid-19-has-revealed-asean-s-institutional-weaknesses}}</ref>
To fully embody the three pillars as part of the 2015 integration, blueprints for APSC and ASCC were subsequently adopted in 2009 in [[Cha-am]], Thailand.<ref>{{cite book|title=Towards A Sustainable Asia: Environment and Climate Change|author=The Association of Academies of Sciences in Asia|date=2011|location=Beijing|publisher=Science Press}}</ref> The ASEAN Community, initially planned to commence by 2020, was accelerated to begin by 31 December 2015.<ref>{{cite web|title=TODAY Online – Countries must work together to deal with shared problems: PM Lee|url=http://www.gov.sg/news/content/today-online-countries-must-work-together-to-deal-with-shared-problems-pm-lee|website=Government of Singapore|access-date=25 November 2015|archive-date=26 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151126041217/http://www.gov.sg/news/content/today-online-countries-must-work-together-to-deal-with-shared-problems-pm-lee|url-status=live}}</ref> It was decided during the 12th ASEAN Summit in [[Cebu]] in 2007.<ref>{{cite web|title=Cebu declaration on the acceleration of the establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015|url=http://www.asean.org/component/zoo/item/about-asean-overview-cebu-declaration-on-the-acceleration-of-the-establishment-of-an-asean-community-by-2015?Itemid=185|access-date=17 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150617102112/http://www.asean.org/component/zoo/item/about-asean-overview-cebu-declaration-on-the-acceleration-of-the-establishment-of-an-asean-community-by-2015?Itemid=185|archive-date=17 June 2015}}</ref>
<!--
At the 23rd ASEAN Summit in November 2013, leaders decided to develop a post-2015 Vision and created the High-Level Task Force (HLTF) that consists of ten high-level representatives from all member states. The Vision was adopted at the 27th Summit in November 2015 in Kuala Lumpur. The ASEAN community would revise and renew its vision every ten years to provide a framework for continuous development and further integration.


===AEC Blueprint===
The terms in the post-2015 Vision are divided into four subcategories, namely APSC, AEC, ASCC, and Moving Forward. APSC issues are covered under articles 7 and 8. The former generally states the community's overall aspiration to aim for a united, inclusive and resilient community. It also puts human and environmental security as crucial points. Deepening engagement with both internal and external parties are also stressed to contribute to international peace, security and stability.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN COMMUNITY VISION 2025|url=http://www.asean.org/storage/images/2015/November/aec-page/ASEAN-Community-Vision-2025.pdf|access-date=24 September 2016|archive-date=10 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161010184551/http://www.asean.org/storage/images/2015/November/aec-page/ASEAN-Community-Vision-2025.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> The "Moving Forward" subcategory implies the acknowledgement of weaknesses of the institution's capacity to process and coordinate ASEAN work. Strengthening ASEAN Secretariat and other ASEAN organs and bodies is therefore desired. There is also a call for a higher level of ASEAN institutional presence at the national, regional and international levels.{{citation needed|date=May 2020}}
[[File:KL Declaration Signing 11.22.15.jpg|thumb|ASEAN leaders sign the declaration of the ASEAN Economic Community during the 27th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, 2015]]


The AEC aims to "implement economic integration initiatives" to create a single market for member states.<ref name="Primer">{{cite book |url=http://www.dfa.gov.ph/images/PDF/AEC%20Primer_Ebook2.pdf |title=Understanding the ASEAN Economic Community; A Primer |publisher=Department of Trade and Industry (Philippines) |edition=1st |access-date=10 February 2015 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053213/https://www.dfa.gov.ph/images/PDF/AEC%20Primer_Ebook2.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community|title=ASEAN Economic Community - ASEAN - ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY|access-date=6 September 2014|archive-date=3 September 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140903023000/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community|url-status=live}}</ref> The blueprint that serves as a comprehensive guide for the establishment of the community was adopted on 20 November 2007 at the 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore.<ref name="Primer"/><ref name="Blueprint">{{cite book|title=ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-979-3496-77-1|pages=56|url=http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-10.pdf|access-date=7 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203402/http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-10.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> Its characteristics include a single market and production base, a highly competitive economic region, a region of fair economic development, and a region fully integrated into the global economy. The areas of cooperation include human resources development, recognition of professional qualifications, closer consultation economic policies, enhanced infrastructure and communications connectivity, integrating industries for regional sourcing, and strengthening private sector involvement. Through the free movement of skilled labour, goods, services and investment, ASEAN would rise globally as one market, thus increasing its competitiveness and opportunities for development.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.lga.gov.ph/sites/default/files/knowledgeProducts-pdf/Rising%20As%20One%20The%20ASEAN%20Economic%20Integration.pdf |title=Rising as One: The Filipino Nation Towards the ASEAN Economic Integration |publisher=Local Government Academy of the Philippines |isbn=978-971-0576-41-8 |pages=23 |access-date=11 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140731172032/http://www.lga.gov.ph/sites/default/files/knowledgeProducts-pdf/Rising%20As%20One%20The%20ASEAN%20Economic%20Integration.pdf |archive-date=31 July 2014 }}</ref>
Additionally, ASEAN institutional weakness has been further amplified by the ineffectiveness of its initiatives in fighting against COVID-19. ASEAN has been making painstaking efforts to combat the pandemic by establishing both intra and extra-regional ad hoc agencies such as theASEAN-China Ad-Hoc Health Ministers Joint Task Force, the Special ASEAN Summit on the COVID-19, COVID-19 ASEAN Response Fund, and the Special ASEAN Plus Three Summit on COVID-19. These mechanisms aim to facilitate senior discussions among regional actors on how to contain the pandemic's spread and reduce its negative impacts. However, their practical implementations are still insignificant when the cooperation among member states is insubstantial, as illustrated by the polarisation of their COVID-19 policies and the high number of cases and deaths in the region.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Phuong|first=Pham|date=7 July 2020|title=COVID-19 has revealed ASEAN's institutional weaknesses|work=Global-is-asian|publisher=Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore|url=https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/gia/article/covid-19-has-revealed-asean-s-institutional-weaknesses|url-status=live|access-date=10 September 2020|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053214/https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/gia/article/covid-19-has-revealed-asean-s-institutional-weaknesses}}</ref>
-->


===APSC Blueprint===
===APSC Blueprint===
During the 14th ASEAN Summit, the group adopted the APSC Blueprint.<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-8411-06-6|pages=20|url=http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-18.pdf|access-date=7 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203428/http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-18.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> This document is aimed at creating a robust political-security environment within ASEAN, with programs and activities outlined to establish the APSC by 2016. It is based on the ASEAN Charter, the ASEAN Security Community Plan of Action, and the Vientiane Action Program. The APSC aims to create a sense of responsibility toward comprehensive security and a dynamic, outward-looking region in an increasingly integrated and interdependent world.
During the 14th ASEAN Summit, the group adopted the APSC Blueprint.<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint|date=Jun 2009|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-8411-06-6|page=20|url=http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-18.pdf|access-date=7 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203428/http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-18.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> This document is aimed at creating a robust political-security environment within ASEAN, with programs and activities outlined to establish the APSC by 2016. It is based on the ASEAN Charter, the ASEAN Security Community Plan of Action, and the Vientiane Action Program. The APSC aims to create a sense of responsibility toward comprehensive security and a dynamic, outward-looking region in an increasingly integrated and interdependent world.


The ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration (ADIC) was proposed at the 4th ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting (ADMM) on 11 May 2010 in [[Hanoi]].<ref name="ReferenceC">{{cite web|title=Annex 10- ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting: Concept Paper on Establishing ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration|url=http://admm.asean.org|access-date=30 September 2020|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053217/https://admm.asean.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> It has the purpose, among others, to reduce defence imports from non-ASEAN countries by half and to further develop the defence industry in the region.<ref>Sneha Raghavan and Guy Ben-Ari (7 September 2011) Current Issues- No. 25: ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration -www.csis.org/ISP/DIIG</ref> It was formally adopted on the next ADMM on 19 May 2011, in Jakarta, Indonesia.<ref>{{cite web|title=2011 JOINT DECLARATION OF THE ASEAN DEFENCE MINISTERS ON STRENGTHENING DEFENCE COOPERATION OF ASEAN IN THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES|url=http://www.asean.org/news/item/joint-declaration-of-the-asean-defence-ministers-on-strengthening-defence-cooperation-of-asean-in-the-global-community-to-face-new-challenges-jakarta-19-may-2011|website=www.asean.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150109042135/http://www.asean.org/news/item/joint-declaration-of-the-asean-defence-ministers-on-strengthening-defence-cooperation-of-asean-in-the-global-community-to-face-new-challenges-jakarta-19-may-2011|archive-date=9 January 2015}}</ref> The main focus is to industrially and technologically boost the security capability of ASEAN,<ref name="csis.org">{{cite web|title=Sneha Raghavan and Guy Ben-Ari (2011, September 7) Current Issues- No. 25: ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration|url=http://www.csis.org/ISP/DIIG|access-date=18 February 2019|archive-date=10 June 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090610105520/http://www.csis.org/isp/diig/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Last Meeting: 2nd ADMM-Plus, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam, 29 August 2013|url=http://ADMM.ASEAN.org|access-date=30 September 2020|archive-date=17 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200817115534/https://admm.asean.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> consistent with the principles of flexibility and non-binding and voluntary participation among the member states.<ref>{{cite web|title=3rd ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration Workshop|url=http://www2.mindef.gov.bn|access-date=30 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140625035140/http://mindef.gov.bn/|archive-date=25 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting: Concept Paper on Establishing ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration|url=http://admm.asean.org|access-date=30 September 2020|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053223/https://admm.asean.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> The concept revolves around education and capability-building programs to develop the skills and capabilities of the workforce, production of capital for defence products, and the provision of numerous services to address the security needs of each member state. It also aims to develop an intra-ASEAN defence trade.<ref name="ReferenceC"/> ADIC aims to establish a strong defence industry relying on the local capabilities of each member state and limit annual procurement from external original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).<ref name="ReferenceC"/> Countries like the US, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, UK, China, South Korea, Israel, and the Netherlands are among the major suppliers to ASEAN.<ref>{{cite web|title=Sneha Raghavan and Guy Ben-Ari (2011, September 7) Current Issues- No. 25: ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration|url=http://www.csis.org/ISP/DIIG/|access-date=18 February 2019|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053223/https://www.csis.org/programs/international-security-program/defense-industrial-initiatives-group|url-status=live}}</ref> ASEAN defence budget rose by 147% from 2004 to 2013 and is expected to rise further in the future.<ref>{{cite web|title=Fear Us: Military Expenditures in Southeast Asia (11 Sep 2014)|url=http://www.IndoPacificReview.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921200104/http://www.indopacificreview.com/|archive-date=2013-09-21}}</ref> Factors affecting the increase include economic growth, ageing equipment, and the plan to strengthen the establishment of the defence industry.<ref>{{cite news|author1=J. Dowdy |author2=D. Chinn |author3=M. Mancini |author4=J. Ng |title=Southeast Asia: The next growth opportunity in defence McKinsey - Innovation Campus Aerospace and Defence Practice}}</ref> ASEANAPOL is also established to enhance cooperation on law enforcement and crime control among police forces of member states.<ref>{{cite web |title=ASEANAPOL, The Urgency to Keep The Region Safe – ICOAS |url=https://icoas.ppispanyol.org/2017/12/31/aseanapol-the-urgency-to-keep-the-region-safe/ |website=icoas.ppispanyol.org |access-date=8 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053224/https://ups-error.com/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
The ASEAN Defense Industry Collaboration (ADIC) was proposed at the 4th ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM) on 11 May 2010 in [[Hanoi]].<ref name="ReferenceC">{{cite web|title=Annex 10: ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting: Concept Paper on Establishing ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration|url=https://admm.asean.org/dmdocuments/12.%20ANNEX%2010-%20Concept%20Paper%20on%20Establishing%20ADIC.pdf|work=ADMM|publisher=ASEAN|date=19 May 2011|access-date=26 October 2025|archive-date=23 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210423112629/https://admm.asean.org/dmdocuments/12.%20ANNEX%2010-%20Concept%20Paper%20on%20Establishing%20ADIC.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Its purpose, among others, is to reduce defence imports from non-ASEAN countries by half and to further develop the defence industry in the region.<ref name="csis-adic" /> It was formally adopted on the next ADMM on 19 May 2011, in Jakarta, Indonesia.<ref>{{cite web|title=2011 JOINT DECLARATION OF THE ASEAN DEFENCE MINISTERS ON STRENGTHENING DEFENCE COOPERATION OF ASEAN IN THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES|url=http://www.asean.org/news/item/joint-declaration-of-the-asean-defence-ministers-on-strengthening-defence-cooperation-of-asean-in-the-global-community-to-face-new-challenges-jakarta-19-may-2011|website=asean.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150109042135/http://www.asean.org/news/item/joint-declaration-of-the-asean-defence-ministers-on-strengthening-defence-cooperation-of-asean-in-the-global-community-to-face-new-challenges-jakarta-19-may-2011|archive-date=9 January 2015}}</ref> The main focus is to industrially and technologically boost the security capability of ASEAN,<ref name="csis-adic">{{cite web |last1=Ben-Ari |first1=Guy |last2=Raghavan |first2=Sneha |title=DIIG Current Issues No. 25: ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration |url=https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/110907_DIIG_Current_Issues_25_ASEAN.pdf |work=[[Center for Strategic and International Studies|CSIS]] |date=7 September 2011 |access-date=26 October 2025 |archive-date=14 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240714004941/https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/110907_DIIG_Current_Issues_25_ASEAN.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> consistent with the principles of flexibility and non-binding and voluntary participation among the member states.<ref>{{cite web|title=3rd ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration Workshop|url=http://www2.mindef.gov.bn|access-date=30 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140625035140/http://mindef.gov.bn/|archive-date=25 June 2014}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceC" /> The concept revolves around education and capability-building programs to develop the skills and capabilities of the workforce, production of capital for defence products, and the provision of numerous services to address the security needs of each member state. It also aims to develop an intra-ASEAN defence trade.<ref name="ReferenceC" /> ADIC aims to establish a strong defence industry relying on the local capabilities of each member state and limit annual procurement from external original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).<ref name="ReferenceC" /> Countries like the US, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, UK, China, South Korea, Israel, and the Netherlands are among the major suppliers to ASEAN.<ref name="csis-adic" /> ASEAN defence budget rose by 147% from 2004 to 2013 and is expected to rise further in the future.<ref>{{cite web |last=Abuza |first=Zachary |title=Fear Us: Military Expenditures in Southeast Asia |url=http://www.indopacificreview.com/military-expenditures-southeast-asia/ |work=Indo-Pacific Review |date=11 September 2014 |access-date=21 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150109042246/http://www.indopacificreview.com/military-expenditures-southeast-asia |archive-date=9 January 2015 }}</ref> Factors affecting the increase include economic growth, ageing equipment, and the plan to strengthen the establishment of the defence industry.<ref>{{cite news|author1=J. Dowdy |author2=D. Chinn |author3=M. Mancini |author4=J. Ng |date=February 2014|title=Southeast Asia: The next growth opportunity in defence McKinsey Innovation Campus Aerospace and Defence Practice}}</ref> ASEANAPOL is also established to enhance cooperation on law enforcement and crime control among police forces of member states.<ref>{{cite web |title=ASEANAPOL, The Urgency to Keep The Region Safe – ICOAS |url=https://icoas.ppispanyol.org/2017/12/31/aseanapol-the-urgency-to-keep-the-region-safe/ |website=icoas.ppispanyol.org |access-date=8 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053224/https://ups-error.com/ |url-status=usurped }}</ref>


However, the unequal level of capabilities among the member states in the defence industry and the lack of established defence trade pose challenges.<ref name="csis.org"/> Before the adoption of the ADIC concept, the status of the defence industry base in each of the member states was at a different level.<ref name="csis.org"/> Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand are among the top member states with an established defence industry base, but they possess different levels of capacity. The remaining member states have yet to develop and enhance their capabilities.<ref name="ReferenceC"/><ref name="csis.org"/> Indonesia and Singapore are among the most competitive players; the former is the only one recognised as one of the top 100 global defence suppliers from between 2010 and 2013.<ref>{{cite web|title=Sneha Raghavan and Guy Ben-Ari (2010, September 7) Current Issues- No. 25: ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration|url=http://www.csis.org/ISP/DIIG|access-date=18 February 2019|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053232/https://www.csis.org/programs/international-security-program/defense-industrial-initiatives-group|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://special.DefenseNews.com|title=Defense News Top 100 for 2013|website=Special.defencenews.com|access-date=28 July 2022}}</ref> ASEAN member states purchase virtually no defence products from within ASEAN. Singapore purchases products from Germany, France, and Israel. Malaysia purchased only 0.49% from ASEAN, Indonesia 0.1%, and Thailand 8.02%.<ref name="csis.org"/>
===AEC Blueprint===
[[File:KL Declaration Signing 11.22.15.jpg|thumb|ASEAN leaders sign the declaration of the ASEAN Economic Community during the 27th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, 2015.]]


The ASEAN Convention on Counter-Terrorism (ACCT) serves as a framework for regional cooperation to counter, prevent, and suppress terrorism and deepen counter-terrorism cooperation.<ref name="ACCT">{{cite news|title=ASEAN Convention on Counter-Terrorism Completes Ratification Process|url=http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/asean-convention-on-counter-terrorism-completes-ratification-process|access-date=10 February 2015|agency=ASEAN News|publisher=ASEAN|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429045413/http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/asean-convention-on-counter-terrorism-completes-ratification-process|archive-date=29 April 2015}}</ref> It was signed by ASEAN leaders in 2007. On 28 April 2011, Brunei ratified the convention and a month later, the convention came into force. Malaysia became the tenth member state to ratify ACCT on 11 January 2013.<ref name="ACCT"/>
The AEC aims to "implement economic integration initiatives" to create a single market for member states.<ref name="Primer">{{cite book |url=http://www.dfa.gov.ph/images/PDF/AEC%20Primer_Ebook2.pdf |title=Understanding the ASEAN Economic Community; A Primer |date=28 February 2014 |publisher=Department of Trade and Industry (Philippines) |edition=1st |access-date=10 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053213/https://www.dfa.gov.ph/images/PDF/AEC%20Primer_Ebook2.pdf |archive-date=30 September 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ASEAN Economic Community – ASEAN – ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY |url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140903023000/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community |archive-date=3 September 2014 |access-date=6 September 2014}}</ref> The blueprint that serves as a comprehensive guide for the establishment of the community was adopted on 20 November 2007 at the 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore.<ref name="Primer" /><ref name="Blueprint">{{cite book |url=http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-10.pdf |title=ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint |date=Jan 2008 |publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations |isbn=978-979-3496-77-1 |location=Jakarta |page=56 |access-date=7 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203402/http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-10.pdf |archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> Its characteristics include a single market and production base, a highly competitive economic region, a region of fair economic development, and a region fully integrated into the global economy. The areas of cooperation include human resources development, recognition of professional qualifications, closer consultation economic policies, enhanced infrastructure and communications connectivity, integrating industries for regional sourcing, and strengthening private sector involvement. Through the free movement of skilled labour, goods, services and investment, ASEAN would rise globally as one market, thus increasing its competitiveness and opportunities for development.<ref>{{cite book |url=http://www.lga.gov.ph/sites/default/files/knowledgeProducts-pdf/Rising%20As%20One%20The%20ASEAN%20Economic%20Integration.pdf |title=Rising as One: The Filipino Nation Towards the ASEAN Economic Integration |date=2013 |publisher=Local Government Academy of the Philippines |isbn=978-971-0576-41-8 |page=23 |access-date=11 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140731172032/http://www.lga.gov.ph/sites/default/files/knowledgeProducts-pdf/Rising%20As%20One%20The%20ASEAN%20Economic%20Integration.pdf |archive-date=31 July 2014}}</ref>


===ASCC Blueprint===
To track the progress of the AEC, a compliance tool called the AEC Scorecard was developed based on the EU Internal Market Scorecard.<ref name="Xianbai" /> It is the only one in effect<ref name="aseanec.blogspot.com">{{cite web|url=http://aseanec.blogspot.com/2012/05/grading-asean-economic-community.html|title=AEC Blog: Grading the ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard|author=Edmund Sim|date=25 May 2012|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=15 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150815124400/http://aseanec.blogspot.com/2012/05/grading-asean-economic-community.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and is expected to serve as an unbiased assessment tool to measure the extent of integration and the economic health of the region. It is expected to provide relevant information about regional priorities, and thus foster productive, inclusive, and sustainable growth.<ref name="eastasiaforum.org">{{cite journal|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/06/01/a-critical-look-at-the-asean-economic-community-scorecard/|title=A critical look at the ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard|journal=East Asia Forum|date=June 2012 |access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053233/https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/06/01/a-critical-look-at-the-asean-economic-community-scorecard/|url-status=live |last1=Das |first1=Sanchita Basu }}</ref> It makes it possible to monitor the implementation of ASEAN agreements, and the achievement of milestones indicated in the AEC Strategic Schedule. The scorecard outlines specific actions that must be undertaken collectively and individually to establish AEC by 2015.<ref name="eastasiaforum.org" /> To date, two official scorecards have been published, one in 2010,<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard: Charting Progress Towards Regional Economic Integration|date=Mar 2010|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-8411-35-6|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/AEC%20Scorecard.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203548/http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/AEC%20Scorecard.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> and the other in 2012.<ref name="Scorecard-2012">{{cite book|title=ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard|date=Mar 2012|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarka|isbn=978-602-8411-96-7|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/scorecard_final.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203612/http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/scorecard_final.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref><ref name="Xianbai" /> However, the scorecard is purely quantitative, as it only examines whether a member state has performed the AEC task or not. The more "yes" answers, the higher the score.<ref name="aseanec.blogspot.com" />
The ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) was also adopted during the 14th ASEAN Summit.<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint|publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-8411-07-3|pages=32|url=http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-19.pdf|access-date=7 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203437/http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-19.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> It envisions an "ASEAN Community that is people-centered and socially responsible with a view to achieving enduring solidarity and unity among the countries and peoples of ASEAN by forging a common identity and building a caring and sharing society which is inclusive and harmonious where the well-being, livelihood, and welfare of the peoples are enhanced". Among its focus areas include human development, social welfare and protection, social justice and rights, environmental sustainability, building the ASEAN identity, and narrowing the development gap.
<!--
While Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand have eliminated 99.65% of their tariff lines, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam have decreased tariffs on 98.86% of their lines to the 0-5% tariff range in 2010, and are projected to eliminate tariffs on these goods by 2015, with the ability to do so for a few import duty lines until 2018.<ref name="tax-news.com">{{cite news|last1=Swire|first1=Mary|title=Singapore Plugs ASEAN Trade Integration|url=http://www.tax-news.com/news/Singapore_Plugs_ASEAN_Trade_Integration____65778.html#sthash.zPWaW4hW.dpuf|access-date=12 May 2015|work=Tax-News|date=10 September 2014|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053235/https://www.tax-news.com/news/Singapore_Plugs_ASEAN_Trade_Integration____65778.html#sthash.zPWaW4hW.dpuf|url-status=usurped}}</ref> A recent study by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited has projected that five of the top fifteen manufacturing locations in the world will be in ASEAN by 2018. Furthermore, by 2050, ASEAN is expected to be the fourth-largest economy in the world (after the European Union, the US, and China).<ref name="tax-news.com" />


To track the progress of the AEC, a compliance tool called the AEC Scorecard was developed based on the EU Internal Market Scorecard.<ref name=Xianbai /> It is the only one in effect<ref name="aseanec.blogspot.com">{{cite web|url=http://aseanec.blogspot.com/2012/05/grading-asean-economic-community.html|title=AEC Blog: Grading the ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard|author=Edmund Sim|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=15 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150815124400/http://aseanec.blogspot.com/2012/05/grading-asean-economic-community.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and is expected to serve as an unbiased assessment tool to measure the extent of integration and the economic health of the region. It is expected to provide relevant information about regional priorities, and thus foster productive, inclusive, and sustainable growth.<ref name="eastasiaforum.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/06/01/a-critical-look-at-the-asean-economic-community-scorecard/|title=A critical look at the ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard|work=East Asia Forum|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053233/https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/06/01/a-critical-look-at-the-asean-economic-community-scorecard/|url-status=live}}</ref> It makes it possible to monitor the implementation of ASEAN agreements, and the achievement of milestones indicated in the AEC Strategic Schedule. The scorecard outlines specific actions that must be undertaken collectively and individually to establish AEC by 2015.<ref name="eastasiaforum.org"/> To date, two official scorecards have been published, one in 2010,<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard: Charting Progress Towards Regional Economic Integration|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-8411-35-6|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/AEC%20Scorecard.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203548/http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/AEC%20Scorecard.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> and the other in 2012.<ref name="Scorecard-2012">{{cite book|title=ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat|location=Jakarka|isbn=978-602-8411-96-7|url=http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/scorecard_final.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203612/http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/scorecard_final.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref><ref name="Xianbai"/> However, the scorecard is purely quantitative, as it only examines whether a member state has performed the AEC task or not. The more "yes" answers, the higher the score.<ref name="aseanec.blogspot.com"/>
The AEC envisions the free flow of overseas labour. However, receiving countries may require would-be workers to take licensing examinations in those countries regardless of whether or not the worker has a professional license from their home country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://sbr.com.sg/economy/commentary/what-aec-2015-means-singaporean-businesses|title=What the AEC 2015 means for Singaporean businesses|work=Singapore Business Review|date=27 June 2014|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=25 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150425024551/http://sbr.com.sg/economy/commentary/what-aec-2015-means-singaporean-businesses|url-status=live}}</ref> Singapore is a major destination for skilled migrants from other ASEAN countries, mostly from Malaysia and the Philippines. Total employment there doubled between 1992 and 2008 from 1.5 million to three million, and the number of foreign workers almost tripled, from fewer than 400,000 to nearly 1.1 million. High-skilled foreign talents (customer service, nursing, engineering, IT) earn at least several thousand US dollars a month and with a credential (usually a college degree) receive employment passes.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Southeast Asia: ASEAN 2015|journal=Migration News|date=Oct 2013|volume=20|issue=4|url=https://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/more.php?id=3868_0_3_0|access-date=12 February 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053232/https://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/more.php?id=3868_0_3_0|url-status=live}}</ref> In recent years, Singapore has been slowly cutting down the number of foreign workers to challenge companies to upgrade their hiring criteria and offer more jobs to local residents.
 
While Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand have eliminated 99.65% of their tariff lines, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam have decreased tariffs on 98.86% of their lines to the 0-5% tariff range in 2010, and are projected to eliminate tariffs on these goods by 2015, with the ability to do so for a few import duty lines until 2018.<ref name="tax-news.com">{{cite news|last1=Swire|first1=Mary|title=Singapore Plugs ASEAN Trade Integration|url=http://www.tax-news.com/news/Singapore_Plugs_ASEAN_Trade_Integration____65778.html#sthash.zPWaW4hW.dpuf|access-date=12 May 2015|work=Tax-News|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053235/https://www.tax-news.com/news/Singapore_Plugs_ASEAN_Trade_Integration____65778.html#sthash.zPWaW4hW.dpuf|url-status=live}}</ref> A recent study by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited has projected that five of the top fifteen manufacturing locations in the world will be in ASEAN by 2018. Furthermore, by 2050, ASEAN is expected to be the fourth-largest economy in the world (after the European Union, the US, and China).<ref name="tax-news.com"/>
 
The AEC envisions the free flow of overseas labour. However, receiving countries may require would-be workers to take licensing examinations in those countries regardless of whether or not the worker has a professional license from their home country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://sbr.com.sg/economy/commentary/what-aec-2015-means-singaporean-businesses|title=What the AEC 2015 means for Singaporean businesses|work=Singapore Business Review|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=25 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150425024551/http://sbr.com.sg/economy/commentary/what-aec-2015-means-singaporean-businesses|url-status=live}}</ref> Singapore is a major destination for skilled migrants from other ASEAN countries, mostly from Malaysia and the Philippines. Total employment there doubled between 1992 and 2008 from 1.5 million to three million, and the number of foreign workers almost tripled, from fewer than 400,000 to nearly 1.1 million. High-skilled foreign talents (customer service, nursing, engineering, IT) earn at least several thousand US dollars a month and with a credential (usually a college degree) receive employment passes.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Southeast Asia: ASEAN 2015|journal=Migration News|volume=20|issue=4|url=https://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/more.php?id=3868_0_3_0|access-date=12 February 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053232/https://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/more.php?id=3868_0_3_0|url-status=live}}</ref> In recent years, Singapore has been slowly cutting down the number of foreign workers to challenge companies to upgrade their hiring criteria and offer more jobs to local residents.


Narrowing the Development Gap (NDG) is the framework for addressing disparities among, and within, member states where pockets of underdevelopment exist. Under NDG, ASEAN has continued to coordinate closely with other sub-regional cooperation frameworks (e.g., [[BIMP-EAGA]], IMT-GT, GMS, Mekong programs), viewing them as "equal partners in the development of regional production and distribution networks" in the AEC, and as a platform to "mainstream social development issues in developing and implementing projects" in the context of the ASCC.<ref name="asean.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community/category/overview-ndg-iai-iai-work-plan-iai-task-force-idcf|title=Overview|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150630140736/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community/category/overview-ndg-iai-iai-work-plan-iai-task-force-idcf|archive-date=30 June 2015}}</ref>
Narrowing the Development Gap (NDG) is the framework for addressing disparities among, and within, member states where pockets of underdevelopment exist. Under NDG, ASEAN has continued to coordinate closely with other sub-regional cooperation frameworks (e.g., [[BIMP-EAGA]], IMT-GT, GMS, Mekong programs), viewing them as "equal partners in the development of regional production and distribution networks" in the AEC, and as a platform to "mainstream social development issues in developing and implementing projects" in the context of the ASCC.<ref name="asean.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community/category/overview-ndg-iai-iai-work-plan-iai-task-force-idcf|title=Overview|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150630140736/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community/category/overview-ndg-iai-iai-work-plan-iai-task-force-idcf|archive-date=30 June 2015}}</ref>


The six-year Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) Work Plans have been developed to assist Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam, as well as other sub-regions to ensure quick growth. The First IAI Work Plan was implemented from 2002 to 2008. The second plan (2009-2015) supports the goals of the ASEAN Community and is composed of 182 prescribed actions, which includes studies, training programs, and policy implementation support, conducted through projects supported by older ASEAN member states, and ASEAN's Dialogue partners and external parties. The IAI Work Plan is patterned after and supports the key program areas in the three ASEAN Community Blueprints: ASPC, AEC, and ASCC. The IAI Task Force, composed of representatives of the Committee of Permanent Representatives and its working group from all member states, is in charge of providing general advice and policy guidelines and directions in the design and implementation of the plan. All member states are represented in the IAI Task Force, chaired by representatives of Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam. The ASEAN Secretariat, in particular through the IAI and NDG Division, supports the implementation and management of the IAI Work Plan and coordinates activities related to sub-regional frameworks. The division works closely with the Dialogue Partners, and international agencies, to develop strategies and programs to assist in promoting and implementing IAI and NDG activities in ASEAN.<ref name="asean.org"/>
The six-year Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) Work Plans have been developed to assist Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam, as well as other sub-regions to ensure quick growth. The First IAI Work Plan was implemented from 2002 to 2008. The second plan (2009–2015) supports the goals of the ASEAN Community and is composed of 182 prescribed actions, which include studies, training programs, and policy implementation support, conducted through projects supported by older ASEAN member states, and ASEAN's Dialogue partners and external parties. The IAI Work Plan is patterned after and supports the key program areas in the three ASEAN Community Blueprints: ASPC, AEC, and ASCC. The IAI Task Force, composed of representatives of the Committee of Permanent Representatives and its working group from all member states, is in charge of providing general advice and policy guidelines and directions in the design and implementation of the plan. All member states are represented in the IAI Task Force, chaired by representatives of Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam. The ASEAN Secretariat, in particular through the IAI and NDG Division, supports the implementation and management of the IAI Work Plan and coordinates activities related to sub-regional frameworks. The division works closely with the Dialogue Partners, and international agencies, to develop strategies and programs to assist in promoting and implementing IAI and NDG activities in ASEAN.<ref name="asean.org" />


ASEAN's planned integration has challenged its citizens to embrace a regional identity. It delivers a challenge to construct dynamic institutions and foster sufficient amount of social capital. The underlying assumption is that the creation of a regional identity is of special interest to ASEAN and the intent of the 2020 Vision policy document was to reassert the belief in a regional framework designed as an action plan related to human development and civic empowerment. Accordingly, these assumptions will be the basis for recommendations and strategies in developing a participatory regional identity.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jones|first1=Michael E.|title=Forging an ASEAN Identity: The Challenge to Construct a Shared Destiny|journal=Contemporary Southeast Asia|volume=26|issue=1|pages=140–154|url=https://www.academia.edu/981239|access-date=12 February 2015|doi=10.1355/cs26-1g|s2cid=154782260 |archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053237/https://www.academia.edu/981239/Forging_an_ASEAN_Identity_The_Challenge_to_Construct_a_Shared_Destiny|url-status=live}}</ref>
ASEAN's planned integration has challenged its citizens to embrace a regional identity. It delivers a challenge to construct dynamic institutions and foster sufficient amount of social capital. The underlying assumption is that the creation of a regional identity is of special interest to ASEAN and the intent of the 2020 Vision policy document was to reassert the belief in a regional framework designed as an action plan related to human development and civic empowerment. Accordingly, these assumptions will be the basis for recommendations and strategies in developing a participatory regional identity.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jones|first1=Michael E.|title=Forging an ASEAN Identity: The Challenge to Construct a Shared Destiny|journal=Contemporary Southeast Asia|date=2004|volume=26|issue=1|pages=140–154|url=https://www.academia.edu/981239|access-date=12 February 2015|doi=10.1355/cs26-1g|s2cid=154782260 |archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053237/https://www.academia.edu/981239/Forging_an_ASEAN_Identity_The_Challenge_to_Construct_a_Shared_Destiny|url-status=live}}</ref>
-->


==== APAEC blueprint ====
====APAEC blueprint====
Part of the work towards the ASEAN Economic Community is the integration of the energy systems of the ASEAN member states. The blueprint for this integration is provided by the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC).<ref name="Overland 100019">{{Cite journal|last1=Overland|first1=Indra|last2=Sagbakken|first2=Haakon Fossum|last3=Chan|first3=Hoy-Yen|last4=Merdekawati|first4=Monika|last5=Suryadi|first5=Beni|last6=Utama|first6=Nuki Agya|last7=Vakulchuk|first7=Roman|title=The ASEAN climate and energy paradox|journal=Energy and Climate Change|language=en|volume=2|pages=100019|doi=10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100019 |issn=2666-2787 |hdl=11250/2734506|hdl-access=free}}</ref> APAEC is managed by the ASEAN Center for Energy.
Part of the work towards the ASEAN Economic Community is the integration of the energy systems of the ASEAN member states. The blueprint for this integration is provided by the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC).<ref name="Overland 100019">{{Cite journal|last1=Overland|first1=Indra|last2=Sagbakken|first2=Haakon Fossum|last3=Chan|first3=Hoy-Yen|last4=Merdekawati|first4=Monika|last5=Suryadi|first5=Beni|last6=Utama|first6=Nuki Agya|last7=Vakulchuk|first7=Roman|date=December 2021|title=The ASEAN climate and energy paradox|journal=Energy and Climate Change|volume=2|article-number=100019|doi=10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100019 |issn=2666-2787 |hdl=11250/2734506|hdl-access=free}}</ref> APAEC is managed by the ASEAN Center for Energy. The realisation of the [[ASEAN Power Grid]] (APG) is an important part of APAEC and ASEAN energy cooperation more broadly.<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Chee |first1=Wan Choy |last2=Ho |first2=Wai Shin |last3=Hashim |first3=Haslenda |last4=Lim |first4=Lek Keng |last5=Muis |first5=Zarina Ab |last6=Nizamuddin |first6=Arfah Diyanah |last7=Wong |first7=Keng Yinn |last8=Overland |first8=Indra |last9=Shidiq |first9=Muhammad |last10=Pradnyaswari |first10=Indira |title=Renewable energy trade among the ASEAN countries and the road to net-zero carbon emissions |journal=Energy Strategy Reviews |date=November 2025 |volume=62 |article-number=101878 |doi=10.1016/j.esr.2025.101878 }}</ref>


==== 2020 ASEAN Banking Integration Framework ====
====2020 ASEAN Banking Integration Framework====
As trade is liberalised with the integration in 2015, the need arises for ASEAN banking institutions to accommodate and expand their services to an intra-ASEAN market. Experts, however, have already forecast a shaky economic transition, especially for smaller players in the banking and financial services industry. Two separate reports by [[Standard & Poor's]] (S&P) outline the challenges that ASEAN financial institutions face as they prepare for the 2020 banking integration.{{efn|name=fn1|''ASEAN Financial Integration: The Long Road to Bank Consolidation'' and ''The Philippines' Banking System: The Good, the Bad and the Ambivalent''.}} The reports point out that overcrowded banking sector in the Philippines is expected to feel the most pressure as the integration welcomes tighter competition with bigger and more established foreign banks.<ref name="mb.com.ph">{{cite web|url=http://www.mb.com.ph/sp-cites-moves-by-philippine-banks/|title=S&P cites moves by Philippine banks|author=Manila Bulletin|website=[[Manila Bulletin]] |access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=14 November 2014|archive-url=https://archive.today/2014.11.14-060935/http://www.mb.com.ph/sp-cites-moves-by-philippine-banks/|url-status=live}}</ref> As a result, there needs to be a regional expansion by countries with a small banking sector to lessen the impact of the post-integration environment. In a follow-up report, S&P recently cited the Philippines for "shoring up its network bases and building up capital ahead of the banking integration – playing defence and strengthening their domestic networks".<ref name="mb.com.ph"/>
As trade is liberalised with the integration in 2015, the need arises for ASEAN banking institutions to accommodate and expand their services to an intra-ASEAN market. Experts, however, have already forecast a shaky economic transition, especially for smaller players in the banking and financial services industry. Two separate reports by [[Standard & Poor's]] (S&P) outline the challenges that ASEAN financial institutions face as they prepare for the 2020 banking integration.{{efn|name=fn1|''ASEAN Financial Integration: The Long Road to Bank Consolidation'' and ''The Philippines' Banking System: The Good, the Bad and the Ambivalent''.}} The reports point out that overcrowded banking sector in the Philippines is expected to feel the most pressure as the integration welcomes tighter competition with bigger and more established foreign banks.<ref name="mb.com.ph">{{cite web|url=http://www.mb.com.ph/sp-cites-moves-by-philippine-banks/|title=S&P cites moves by Philippine banks|author=Manila Bulletin|website=[[Manila Bulletin]] |access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=14 November 2014|archive-url=https://archive.today/20141114060935/http://www.mb.com.ph/sp-cites-moves-by-philippine-banks/|url-status=live}}</ref> As a result, there needs to be a regional expansion by countries with a small banking sector to lessen the impact of the post-integration environment. In a follow-up report, S&P recently cited the Philippines for "shoring up its network bases and building up capital ahead of the banking integration – playing defense and strengthening their domestic networks".<ref name="mb.com.ph" />


====Financial integration roadmap====
====Financial integration roadmap====
The roadmap for financial integration is the latest regional initiative that aims to strengthen local self-help and support mechanisms. The roadmap's implementation would contribute to the realisation of the AEC. Adoption of a common currency, when conditions are ripe, could be the final stage of the AEC. The roadmap identifies approaches and milestones in capital market development, capital account and financial services liberalisation, and ASEAN currency cooperation. Capital market development entails promoting institutional capacity as well as the facilitation of greater cross-border collaboration, linkages, and harmonisation between capital markets. Orderly capital account liberalisation would be promoted with adequate safeguards against volatility and systemic risks. To expedite the process of financial services liberalisation, ASEAN has agreed on a positive list modality and adopted milestones to facilitate negotiations. Currency cooperation would involve the exploration of possible currency arrangements, including an ASEAN currency payment system for trade in local goods to reduce the demand for US dollars and to help promote stability of regional currencies, such as by settling intra-ASEAN trade using regional currencies.<ref name="ReferenceB"/>
The roadmap for financial integration is the latest regional initiative that aims to strengthen local self-help and support mechanisms. The roadmap's implementation would contribute to the realisation of the AEC. Adoption of a common currency, when conditions are ripe, could be the final stage of the AEC. The roadmap identifies approaches and milestones in capital market development, capital account and financial services liberalisation, and ASEAN currency cooperation. Capital market development entails promoting institutional capacity as well as the facilitation of greater cross-border collaboration, linkages, and harmonisation between capital markets. Orderly capital account liberalisation would be promoted with adequate safeguards against volatility and systemic risks. To expedite the process of financial services liberalisation, ASEAN has agreed on a positive list modality and adopted milestones to facilitate negotiations. Currency cooperation would involve the exploration of possible currency arrangements, including an ASEAN currency payment system for trade in local goods to reduce the demand for US dollars and to help promote stability of regional currencies, such as by settling intra-ASEAN trade using regional currencies.<ref name="ReferenceB" />
<!--
In regards to a common currency, ASEAN leaders agreed in November 1999 to create the establishment of currency swaps and repurchase agreements as a credit line against future financial shocks. In May 2000, ASEAN finance ministers agreed to plan for closer cooperation through the [[Chiang Mai Initiative]] (CMI).<ref>Financial Integration and Common Currency Area in ASEAN</ref> The CMI has two components, an expanded ASEAN Swap Arrangement (ASA), and a network of bilateral swap arrangements among the ASEAN Plus Three. The ASA preceded the [[1997 Asian financial crisis]] and was originally established by the monetary authorities of the five founding member states to help meet temporary liquidity problems. The ASA now includes all ten member states with an expanded facility of US$1 billion. In recognition of the economic interdependence of [[East Asia]], which has combined foreign exchange reserves amounting to about US$1 trillion, a network of bilateral swap arrangements and repurchase agreements among the [[#ASEAN Plus Three|ASEAN Plus Three]] has been agreed upon. The supplementary facility aims to provide temporary financing for member states with balance-of-payments difficulties. In 2009, 16 bilateral swap arrangements (BSAs) were concluded with a combined amount of about US$35.5 billion.<ref name="ReferenceA">Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralzation</ref> The CMI was signed on 9 December 2009 and took effect on 20 March 2014 while the amended version, the multilateralization of CMI (CMIM), was on 17 July 2014. The CMIM is a multilateral currency swap arrangement governed by a single contractual agreement. In addition, an independent regional surveillance unit called the [[ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic and Research Office]] (AMRO) was established to monitor and analyze economies and to support the CMIM decision-making process.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> The amendments would allow access for the auction of a crisis prevention facility. These amendments are expected to fortify CMIM as the region's financial safety net in the event of any potential or actual liquidity difficulty.<ref>The Amended Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM) Comes into Effect Today, 17 July 2014 Media Releases</ref>


In regards to a common currency, ASEAN leaders agreed in November 1999 to create the establishment of currency swaps and repurchase agreements as a credit line against future financial shocks. In May 2000, ASEAN finance ministers agreed to plan for closer cooperation through the [[Chiang Mai Initiative]] (CMI).<ref>Financial Integration and Common Currency Area in ASEAN</ref> The CMI has two components, an expanded ASEAN Swap Arrangement (ASA), and a network of bilateral swap arrangements among the ASEAN Plus Three. The ASA preceded the 1997 Asian financial crisis and was originally established by the monetary authorities of the five founding member states to help meet temporary liquidity problems. The ASA now includes all ten member states with an expanded facility of US$1 billion. In recognition of the economic interdependence of [[East Asia]], which has combined foreign exchange reserves amounting to about US$1 trillion, a network of bilateral swap arrangements and repurchase agreements among the [[#ASEAN Plus Three|ASEAN Plus Three]] has been agreed upon. The supplementary facility aims to provide temporary financing for member states with balance-of-payments difficulties. In 2009, 16 bilateral swap arrangements (BSAs) were concluded with a combined amount of about US$35.5 billion.<ref name="ReferenceA">Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralzation</ref> The CMI was signed on 9 December 2009 and took effect on 20 March 2014 while the amended version, the multilateralisation of CMI (CMIM), was on 17 July 2014. The CMIM is a multilateral currency swap arrangement governed by a single contractual agreement. In addition, an independent regional surveillance unit called the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) was established to monitor and analyse economies and to support the CMIM decision-making process.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> The amendments would allow access for the auction of a crisis prevention facility. These amendments are expected to fortify CMIM as the region's financial safety net in the event of any potential or actual liquidity difficulty.<ref>The Amended Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM) Comes into Effect Today, 17 July 2014 Media Releases</ref>
During peacetime, the AMRO would conduct annual consultations with individual member economies and prepare quarterly-consolidated reports on the macroeconomic assessment of the ASEAN+3 region and individual member countries. In a time of crisis, the AMRO would prepare recommendations on any swap request based on macroeconomic analysis of a member state and monitor the use and impact of funds once an application is approved. AMRO was officially incorporated as a company limited by guarantee in Singapore on 20 April 2011. Governance of AMRO is being exercised by the executive committee (EC) and its operational direction by the Advisory Panel (AP). AMRO is currently headed by Dr Yoichi Nemoto of Japan, who is serving his second two-year term until 26 May 2016.<ref name="ReferenceA" /><ref name="ReferenceB" />
-->


During peacetime, the AMRO would conduct annual consultations with individual member economies and prepare quarterly-consolidated reports on the macroeconomic assessment of the ASEAN+3 region and individual member countries. In a time of crisis, the AMRO would prepare recommendations on any swap request based on macroeconomic analysis of a member state and monitor the use and impact of funds once an application is approved. AMRO was officially incorporated as a company limited by guarantee in Singapore on 20 April 2011. Governance of AMRO is being exercised by the executive committee (EC) and its operational direction by the Advisory Panel (AP). AMRO is currently headed by Dr Yoichi Nemoto of Japan, who is serving his second two-year term until 26 May 2016.<ref name="ReferenceA"/><ref name="ReferenceB"/>
====Food security====
[[File:ASEAN aid for Marawi.jpg|thumb|ASEAN aid during the [[Marawi crisis|Marawi Crisis]]. Member states are obligated to help one another under the "One ASEAN, One Response" system]]
Member states recognise the importance of strengthening [[food security]] to maintain stability and prosperity in the region.<ref>{{cite web|title=Food Security |url=https://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story028/en/ |website=World Health Organisation |access-date=10 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150917112705/http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story028/en/ |archive-date=17 September 2015 }}</ref> As ASEAN moves towards AEC and beyond, food security would be an integral part of the community-building agenda.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Desker|first1=Barry|last2=Caballero-Anthony|first2=Mely|last3=Teng|first3=Paul|title=Thought/Issues Paper on ASEAN Food Security: Towards a more Comprehensive Framework|date=Oct 2013|publisher=Nanyang Technological University|location=Singapore|url=http://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2013-20.pdf|access-date=10 February 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053232/https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2013-20.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Strengthened food security is even more relevant in light of potentially severe risks from climate change with agriculture and fisheries being the most affected industries.<ref>Overland, Indra et al. (2017) ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320622312 Impact of Climate Change on ASEAN International Affairs: Risk and Opportunity Multiplier]'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728061128/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320622312_Impact_of_Climate_Change_on_ASEAN_International_Affairs_Risk_and_Opportunity_Multiplier |date=28 July 2020 }}, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and Myanmar Institute of International and Strategic Studies (MISIS).</ref>


====Food security====
Part of the aim of ASEAN integration is to achieve food security collectively via [[trade]] in rice and maize. [[Trade facilitation]] measures and the harmonisation/equivalency of food regulation and control standards would reduce the cost of trade in food products. While specialisation and revealed comparative and competitive indices point to complementarities between trade patterns among the member states, intra-ASEAN trade in agriculture is quite small, something that integration could address.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Bello|first1=Amelia L.|title=Ensuring Food Security—A Case for ASEAN Integration|journal=Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development|volume=2|issue=1,2|url=http://searca.org/ajad/index.php/previous-issues/13-view-article?aid=28|access-date=12 February 2015|issn=1656-4383|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053236/https://ajad.searca.org/index.php/previous-issues/13-view-article?aid=28|url-status=live}}</ref> The MARKET project would provide flexible and demand-driven support to the ASEAN Secretariat while bringing more private-sector and civil-society input into regional agriculture policy dialogue. By building an environment that reduces barriers to trade, ASEAN trade would increase, thereby decreasing the risk of food price crisis.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/strengthening-food-security-for-asean-citizens-asean-us-cooperation-on-food-security-initiative-market-project-reduces-market-volatility-through-increased-regional-trade|title=Strengthening Food Security for ASEAN Citizens: ASEAN – U.S. Cooperation on Food Security initiative "MARKET" Project Reduces Market Volatility through Increased Regional Trade|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429043831/http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/strengthening-food-security-for-asean-citizens-asean-us-cooperation-on-food-security-initiative-market-project-reduces-market-volatility-through-increased-regional-trade|archive-date=29 April 2015}}</ref>
Member states recognise the importance of strengthening [[food security]] to maintain stability and prosperity in the region.<ref>{{cite web|title=Food Security |url=https://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story028/en/ |website=World Health Organisation |access-date=10 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150917112705/http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story028/en/ |archive-date=17 September 2015 }}</ref> As ASEAN moves towards AEC and beyond, food security would be an integral part of the community-building agenda.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Desker|first1=Barry|last2=Caballero-Anthony|first2=Mely|last3=Teng|first3=Paul|title=Thought/Issues Paper on ASEAN Food Security: Towards a more Comprehensive Framework|publisher=Nanyang Technological University|location=Singapore|url=http://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2013-20.pdf|access-date=10 February 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053232/https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2013-20.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Strengthened food security is even more relevant in light of potentially severe risks from climate change with agriculture and fisheries being the most affected industries.<ref>Overland, Indra et al. (2017) ''[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320622312 Impact of Climate Change on ASEAN International Affairs: Risk and Opportunity Multiplier]'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728061128/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320622312_Impact_of_Climate_Change_on_ASEAN_International_Affairs_Risk_and_Opportunity_Multiplier }}, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and Myanmar Institute of International and Strategic Studies (MISIS).</ref>


Part of the aim of ASEAN integration is to achieve food security collectively via [[trade]] in rice and maize. [[Trade facilitation]] measures and the harmonisation/equivalency of food regulation and control standards would reduce the cost of trade in food products. While specialisation and revealed comparative and competitive indices point to complementarities between trade patterns among the member states, intra-ASEAN trade in agriculture is quite small, something that integration could address.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Bello|first1=Amelia L.|title=Ensuring Food Security--A Case for ASEAN Integration|journal=Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development|volume=2|issue=1,2|url=http://searca.org/ajad/index.php/previous-issues/13-view-article?aid=28|access-date=12 February 2015|issn=1656-4383|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053236/https://ajad.searca.org/index.php/previous-issues/13-view-article?aid=28|url-status=live}}</ref> The MARKET project would provide flexible and demand-driven support to the ASEAN Secretariat while bringing more private-sector and civil-society input into regional agriculture policy dialogue. By building an environment that reduces barriers to trade, ASEAN trade would increase, thereby decreasing the risk of food price crisis.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/strengthening-food-security-for-asean-citizens-asean-us-cooperation-on-food-security-initiative-market-project-reduces-market-volatility-through-increased-regional-trade|title=Strengthening Food Security for ASEAN Citizens: ASEAN – U.S. Cooperation on Food Security initiative "MARKET" Project Reduces Market Volatility through Increased Regional Trade|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150429043831/http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/strengthening-food-security-for-asean-citizens-asean-us-cooperation-on-food-security-initiative-market-project-reduces-market-volatility-through-increased-regional-trade|archive-date=29 April 2015}}</ref>
===ASCC Blueprint===
The ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) was also adopted during the 14th ASEAN Summit.<ref>{{cite book |url=http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-19.pdf |title=ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint |date=Jun 2009 |publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations |isbn=978-602-8411-07-3 |location=Jakarta |page=32 |access-date=7 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203437/http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-19.pdf |archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> It envisions an "ASEAN Community that is people-centered and socially responsible with a view to achieving enduring solidarity and unity among the countries and peoples of ASEAN by forging a common identity and building a caring and sharing society which is inclusive and harmonious where the well-being, livelihood, and welfare of the peoples are enhanced". Its focus areas include human development, social welfare and protection, social justice and rights, environmental sustainability, building the ASEAN identity, and narrowing the development gap.


==Economy==
==Economy==
{{See also|List of ASEAN countries by GDP|List of ASEAN country subdivisions by GDP}}
{{Static row numbers}}<!-- Read [[Talk:List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)/Archive_8#Remove_European_union_please]] before removing -->
{{sticky header}}{{table alignment}}
{| class="wikitable sortable sticky-header-multi static-row-numbers" style="text-align:right;"
|+GDP statistics by country, in 2025
! rowspan="2" | Country<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDP_RPCH@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD |date=11 January 2025 |title=Real GDP growth |access-date=19 January 2025}}</ref>
! rowspan="2" data-sort-type="number" | Population<br /><small>(millions)</small>
! colspan="2" | GDP Nominal
! colspan="2" | GDP (PPP)
|-
! data-sort-type="number" | <small>millions of<br />USD</small>
! data-sort-type="number" | per capita<br /><small>USD</small>
! data-sort-type="number" | <small>millions of<br />Int$</small>
! data-sort-type="number" | per capita<br /><small>Int$</small>
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Indonesia}}
|| 279.965 || 1,430,000 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/IDN |title=datamapper/profile/IDN DataMapper: Indonesia |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 5,030 || 5,010,000 || 17,610
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Singapore}}
|| 5.938 || 564,770 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/SGP |title=datamapper/profile/SGP DataMapper: Singapore |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 92,930 || 952,640 || 156,760
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Thailand}}
|| 65.975 || 546,220 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/THA |title=datamapper/profile/THA DataMapper: Thailand |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 7,770 || 1,850,000 || 26,320
|-
| scope="1" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Philippines}}
|| 114.161 || 497,500 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/PHL |title=datamapper/profile/PHL DataMapper: Philippines |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> ||4,350  || 1,480,000 || 12,920
|-
| scope="1" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Vietnam}}
|| 100.770 || 490,970 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/VNM |title=datamapper/profile/VNM DataMapper: Vietnam |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 4,810 || 1,790,000 || 17,689
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Malaysia}}
|| 33.460 || 444,980 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/MYS |title=datamapper/profile/MYS DataMapper: Malaysia |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 13,140 || 1,470,000 || 43,470
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Myanmar}}
|| 54.506 || 64,940 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/MMR |title=datamapper/profile/MMR DataMapper: Myanmar |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 1,180 || 326,890 || 5,920
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Cambodia}}
|| 17.182 || 49,800 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/KHM |title=datamapper/profile/KHM DataMapper: Cambodia |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 2,870 || 150,050 || 8,650
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Laos}}
|| 7.686 || 16,320 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/LAO |title=datamapper/profile/LAO DataMapper: Lao P.D.R. |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 2,100 || 78,850 || 10,120
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Brunei}}
|| 0.442 || 16,010 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/BRN |title=datamapper/profile/BRN DataMapper: Brunei Darussalam |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 34,970 || 43,830 || 95,760
|-
| scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{flag|Timor-Leste}}
|| 1.355 || 2,130 ({{abbr|2025f|2025 forecast}})<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/TLS |title=datamapper/profile/BRN DataMapper: Timor-Leste |website=[[International Monetary Fund]] |date=11 January 2025 |access-date=11 January 2025}}</ref> || 1,490 || 6,970 || 4,920
|-
! scope="row" style="text-align: left; font-weight: normal;" ! | {{Flag|ASEAN}}
! 684.376 !! 4,076,690 !! 5,957 !! 13,152,260 !! 19,218
|}


[[File:GDP PPP 2021 Selection.svg|upright=1.25|thumb|Selection of GDP PPP data (top 10 countries and blocks) in no particular order]]
[[File:ASEAN Nations Flags in Jakarta 3.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|The flags of the ASEAN member states in [[Jakarta]], Indonesia]]


The group sought economic integration by creating the AEC by the end of 2015 that established a [[single market]].<ref name="asil1">{{Cite web|url=http://www.asil.org/aseanevent/Sim_Intro_to_ASEAN.pdf|title=Trade & Customs Singapore : Introduction to ASEAN Economic Community|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120218183029/http://www.asil.org/aseanevent/Sim_Intro_to_ASEAN.pdf |access-date=28 July 2022|archive-date=18 February 2012 }}</ref> The average economic growth of member states from 1989 to 2009 was between 3.8% and 7%. This was greater than the average growth of APEC, which was 2.8%.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/05/11/asean-economies-past-and-future.html |title=ASEAN economies past and future |work=The Jakarta Post |access-date=8 August 2011 |archive-date=12 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512043847/http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/05/11/asean-economies-past-and-future.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), established on 28 January 1992,<ref name="AFTA" /> includes a Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) to promote the free flow of goods between member states.<ref name="asil1"/> ASEAN had only six members when it was signed. The new member states (Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia) have not fully met AFTA's obligations, but are officially considered part of the agreement as they were required to sign it upon entry into ASEAN, and were given longer time frames to meet AFTA's tariff reduction obligations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/12021.htm |title=Overview |publisher=ASEAN |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081022142043/http://www.asean.org/12021.htm |archive-date=22 October 2008 }}</ref> The next steps are to create a single market and production base, a competitive economic region, a region of equitable economic development, and a region that is fully integrated into the global economy. Since 2007, ASEAN countries have gradually lowered their import duties to member states, with a target of zero import duties by 2016.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) |url=http://www.miti.gov.my/cms/content.jsp?id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_b5e22087-c0a81573-aba0aba0-ab12873b |website=Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Malaysia) |access-date=12 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140820145429/http://www.miti.gov.my/cms/content.jsp?id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_b5e22087-c0a81573-aba0aba0-ab12873b |archive-date=20 August 2014 }}</ref>
The group sought economic integration by creating the AEC by the end of 2015 that established a [[single market]].<ref name="asil1">{{Cite web|url=http://www.asil.org/aseanevent/Sim_Intro_to_ASEAN.pdf|title=Trade & Customs Singapore: Introduction to ASEAN Economic Community|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120218183029/http://www.asil.org/aseanevent/Sim_Intro_to_ASEAN.pdf |access-date=28 July 2022|archive-date=18 February 2012 }}</ref> The average economic growth of member states from 1989 to 2009 was between 3.8% and 7%. This was greater than the average growth of APEC, which was 2.8%.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/05/11/asean-economies-past-and-future.html |title=ASEAN economies past and future |work=The Jakarta Post |date=29 July 2011 |access-date=8 August 2011 |archive-date=12 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512043847/http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/05/11/asean-economies-past-and-future.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), established on 28 January 1992,<ref name="AFTA" /> includes a Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) to promote the free flow of goods between member states.<ref name="asil1" /> ASEAN had only six members when it was signed. The new member states (Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia) have not fully met AFTA's obligations, but are officially considered part of the agreement as they were required to sign it upon entry into ASEAN, and were given longer time frames to meet AFTA's tariff reduction obligations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/12021.htm |title=Overview |publisher=ASEAN |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081022142043/http://www.asean.org/12021.htm |archive-date=22 October 2008 }}</ref> The next steps are to create a single market and production base, a competitive economic region, a region of equitable economic development, and a region that is fully integrated into the global economy. Since 2007, ASEAN countries have gradually lowered their import duties to member states, with a target of zero import duties by 2016.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) |url=http://www.miti.gov.my/cms/content.jsp?id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_b5e22087-c0a81573-aba0aba0-ab12873b |website=Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Malaysia) |access-date=12 February 2015 |date=24 April 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140820145429/http://www.miti.gov.my/cms/content.jsp?id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_b5e22087-c0a81573-aba0aba0-ab12873b |archive-date=20 August 2014 }}</ref>


ASEAN countries have many economic zones (industrial parks, eco-industrial parks, special economic zones, technology parks, and innovation districts) (see reference for comprehensive list from 2015).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media_upgrade/Resources/Publications/UCO_Viet_Nam_Study_FINAL.pdf|title=Economic Zones in the ASEAN|access-date=20 November 2016|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053234/https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2015-08/UCO_Viet_Nam_Study_FINAL_0.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
ASEAN countries have many economic zones (industrial parks, eco-industrial parks, special economic zones, technology parks, and innovation districts) (see reference for comprehensive list from 2015).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media_upgrade/Resources/Publications/UCO_Viet_Nam_Study_FINAL.pdf|title=Economic Zones in the ASEAN|access-date=20 November 2016|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053234/https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2015-08/UCO_Viet_Nam_Study_FINAL_0.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
In 2018, eight of the ASEAN members are among the world's outperforming economies, with positive long-term prospect for the region.<ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN countries among world's outperforming emerging economies: Report |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-countries-among-world-s-outperforming-emerging-economies-10718216 |work=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=17 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180917181637/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-countries-among-world-s-outperforming-emerging-economies-10718216 |url-status=live }}</ref> ASEAN's Secretariat projects that the regional body will grow to become the world's fourth largest economy by 2030.<ref name="E&E-20191120">{{cite news |last1=Gronewold |first1=Nathanial |title=Booming Southeast Asia's dirty secret: Coal |url=https://www.eenews.net/stories/1061593609 |access-date=22 November 2019 |work=E&E News |agency=Climatewire |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053238/https://www.eenews.net/stories/1061593609 |url-status=live }}</ref>
In 2018, eight of the ASEAN members are among the world's outperforming economies, with positive long-term prospect for the region.<ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN countries among world's outperforming emerging economies: Report |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-countries-among-world-s-outperforming-emerging-economies-10718216 |work=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=17 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180917181637/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-countries-among-world-s-outperforming-emerging-economies-10718216 |url-status=live }}</ref> ASEAN's Secretariat projects that the regional body will grow to become the world's fourth largest economy by 2030.<ref name="E&E-20191120">{{cite news |last1=Gronewold |first1=Nathanial |title=Booming Southeast Asia's dirty secret: Coal |url=https://www.eenews.net/stories/1061593609 |access-date=22 November 2019 |work=E&E News |via=Climatewire |date=20 November 2019 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053238/https://www.eenews.net/stories/1061593609 |url-status=live }}</ref>


The ASEAN Centre for Energy publishes the ASEAN Energy Outlook every five years, analysing and promoting the integration of national energy systems across the region. The sixth edition was published in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The 6th ASEAN Energy Outlook|url=https://aseanenergy.org/the-6th-asean-energy-outlook/|access-date=2021-02-20|website=ASEAN Centre for Energy|language=en-US}}</ref>
The ASEAN Centre for Energy publishes the ASEAN Energy Outlook every five years, analysing and promoting the integration of national energy systems across the region. The sixth edition was published in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-11-19|title=The 6th ASEAN Energy Outlook|url=https://aseanenergy.org/the-6th-asean-energy-outlook/|access-date=2021-02-20|website=ASEAN Centre for Energy}}</ref>


===Internal market===
===Internal market===
ASEAN planned to establish a single market based upon the [[Four Freedoms (European Union)|four freedoms]] by the end of 2015, with the goal of ensuring free flow of goods, services, skilled labour, and capital. The ASEAN Economic Community was formed in 2015,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://asean.org/asean-economic-community/|title=You are being redirected...|website=asean.org}}</ref> but the group deferred about 20% of the harmonization provisions needed to create a [[common market]] and set a new deadline of 2025.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.asiapathways-adbi.org/2017/07/will-2025-be-the-final-deadline-for-the-asean-economic-community/|title=Will 2025 be the final deadline for the ASEAN Economic Community?|first=Jayant|last=Menon}}</ref>
ASEAN planned to establish a single market based upon the [[Four Freedoms (European Union)|four freedoms]] by the end of 2015, with the goal of ensuring free flow of goods, services, skilled labour, and capital. The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) was formed in 2015,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://asean.org/asean-economic-community/|title=Legal Instruments|website=asean.org}}</ref> but the group deferred about 20% of the harmonisation provisions needed to create a [[common market]] and set a new deadline of 2025.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.asiapathways-adbi.org/2017/07/will-2025-be-the-final-deadline-for-the-asean-economic-community/|title=Will 2025 be the final deadline for the ASEAN Economic Community?|first=Jayant|last=Menon|date=14 July 2017}}</ref> In May 2025, ASEAN adopted a new Community Vision 2045 and AEC Strategic Plan 2026&ndash;2030, maintaining a single market as a goal.<ref>{{cite web |title=ASEAN Community Vision 2045 |date=2025-05-26 |url=https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/05.-ASEAN-Community-Vision-2045_adopted.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ASEAN Economic Community Strategic Plan 2026&ndash;2030 of the ASEAN Community Vision 2045 |date=May 2025 |url=https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AEC-Strategic-Plan-2026-2030.pdf}}</ref>


Until the end of 2010, intra-ASEAN trade was still low as trade involved mainly exports to countries outside the region, with the exception of Laos and Myanmar, whose foreign trade was ASEAN-oriented.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.antaranews.com/en/news/77403/asean-feared-to-become-multinational-companies-market-only|work=Anatara News|title=ASEAN feared to become multinational companies market only|access-date=10 November 2011|archive-date=12 January 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112112614/http://www.antaranews.com/en/news/77403/asean-feared-to-become-multinational-companies-market-only|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2009, realised [[foreign direct investment]] (FDI) was US$37.9 billion and increased two-fold in 2010 to US$75.8 billion. 22% of FDI came from the [[European Union]], followed by ASEAN countries (16%), and by Japan and the United States.
Until the end of 2010, intra-ASEAN trade was still low as trade involved mainly exports to countries outside the region, with the exception of Laos and Myanmar, whose foreign trade was ASEAN-oriented.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.antaranews.com/en/news/77403/asean-feared-to-become-multinational-companies-market-only|work=Anatara News|title=ASEAN feared to become multinational companies market only|date=10 November 2011|access-date=10 November 2011|archive-date=12 January 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112112614/http://www.antaranews.com/en/news/77403/asean-feared-to-become-multinational-companies-market-only|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2009, realised [[foreign direct investment]] (FDI) was US$37.9 billion and increased two-fold in 2010 to US$75.8 billion. 22% of FDI came from the [[European Union]], followed by ASEAN countries (16%), and by Japan and the United States.


The ASEAN Framework Agreement on Trade in Services (AFAS) was adopted at the ASEAN Summit in Bangkok in December 1995.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/6628.htm |title=ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services (1995) |publisher=ASEAN |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091226223120/http://www.asean.org/6628.htm |archive-date=26 December 2009 }}</ref> Under the agreement, member states enter into successive rounds of negotiations to liberalise trade in services with the aim of submitting increasingly higher levels of commitment. ASEAN has concluded seven packages of commitments under AFAS.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/6626.htm |title=Overview |publisher=ASEAN |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110206130652/http://www.asean.org/6626.htm |archive-date=6 February 2011 }}</ref>
The ASEAN Framework Agreement on Trade in Services (AFAS) was adopted at the ASEAN Summit in Bangkok in December 1995.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/6628.htm |title=ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services (1995) |publisher=ASEAN |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091226223120/http://www.asean.org/6628.htm |archive-date=26 December 2009 }}</ref> Under the agreement, member states enter into successive rounds of negotiations to liberalise trade in services with the aim of submitting increasingly higher levels of commitment. ASEAN has concluded seven packages of commitments under AFAS.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/6626.htm |title=Overview |publisher=ASEAN |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110206130652/http://www.asean.org/6626.htm |archive-date=6 February 2011 }}</ref>


Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) have been agreed upon by ASEAN for eight professions: physicians, dentists, nurses, architects, engineers, accountants, surveyors, and tourism professionals. Individuals in these professions will be free to work in any ASEAN states effective 31 December 2015.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Buranasomphop|first1=Duangkamol|title=Asean 2015: Free movement of labour|url=http://en.aectourismthai.com/content1/1411|access-date=11 May 2015|publisher=AEC Tourism Thailand|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518070624/http://en.aectourismthai.com/content1/1411|archive-date=18 May 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Concern over free flow of labour after AEC starts|url=http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Concern-over-free-flow-of-labour-after-AEC-starts-30238365.html|access-date=11 May 2015|work=The Nation|archive-date=18 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518102622/http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Concern-over-free-flow-of-labour-after-AEC-starts-30238365.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Why the AEC in 2015 Will Lead to Few Changes in Thailand |url=http://www.norcham.com/news/why-the-aec-in-2015-will-lead-to-few-changes-in-thailand |website=Thai-Norwegian Chamber of Commerce |access-date=12 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518093814/http://www.norcham.com/news/why-the-aec-in-2015-will-lead-to-few-changes-in-thailand |archive-date=18 May 2015 }}</ref>
Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) have been agreed upon by ASEAN for eight professions: physicians, dentists, nurses, architects, engineers, accountants, surveyors, and tourism professionals. Individuals in these professions will be free to work in any ASEAN states effective 31 December 2015.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Buranasomphop|first1=Duangkamol|title=Asean 2015: Free movement of labour|url=http://en.aectourismthai.com/content1/1411|access-date=11 May 2015|publisher=AEC Tourism Thailand|date=14 June 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518070624/http://en.aectourismthai.com/content1/1411|archive-date=18 May 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Concern over free flow of labour after AEC starts|url=http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Concern-over-free-flow-of-labour-after-AEC-starts-30238365.html|access-date=11 May 2015|work=The Nation|date=13 July 2014|archive-date=18 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518102622/http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Concern-over-free-flow-of-labour-after-AEC-starts-30238365.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Why the AEC in 2015 Will Lead to Few Changes in Thailand |url=http://www.norcham.com/news/why-the-aec-in-2015-will-lead-to-few-changes-in-thailand |website=Thai-Norwegian Chamber of Commerce |access-date=12 May 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518093814/http://www.norcham.com/news/why-the-aec-in-2015-will-lead-to-few-changes-in-thailand |archive-date=18 May 2015 }}</ref>


In addition, six member states ([[Malaysia]], [[Vietnam]] (2 exchanges), [[Indonesia]], [[Philippines]], [[Thailand]], and [[Singapore]]) have collaborated on integrating their stock exchanges, which includes 70% of its transaction values with the goal to compete with international exchanges.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/indonesia-belum-akan-masuk-asean-linkage |title=Indonesia belum akan masuk Asean Linkage |author=Anna Suci Perwitasari |access-date=17 January 2014 |archive-date=10 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141210101112/http://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/indonesia-belum-akan-masuk-asean-linkage |url-status=live }}</ref>
In addition, six member states ([[Malaysia]], [[Vietnam]] (2 exchanges), [[Indonesia]], [[Philippines]], [[Thailand]], and [[Singapore]]) have collaborated on integrating their stock exchanges, which includes 70% of its transaction values with the goal to compete with international exchanges.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/indonesia-belum-akan-masuk-asean-linkage |title=Indonesia belum akan masuk Asean Linkage |author=Anna Suci Perwitasari |date=13 June 2012 |access-date=17 January 2014 |archive-date=10 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141210101112/http://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/indonesia-belum-akan-masuk-asean-linkage |url-status=live }}</ref>


Single market will also include the [[ASEAN Single Aviation Market]] (ASEAN-SAM), the region's aviation policy geared towards the development of a [[Open skies|unified and single aviation market]] in [[Southeast Asia]]. It was proposed by the ASEAN Air Transport Working Group, supported by the ASEAN Senior Transport Officials Meeting, and endorsed by the ASEAN Transport Ministers.<ref name="ASEAN SAM">{{cite web|url=http://www.asian-aerocad.com/news/news.php?newsid=23 |title=Asean Single Aviation Market |access-date=26 September 2008 |work=Straits Times |location=Singapore |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209063906/http://www.asian-aerocad.com/news/news.php?newsid=23 |archive-date=9 December 2008 }}</ref> It is expected to liberalise air travel between member states allowing ASEAN airlines to benefit directly from the growth in air travel, and also free up tourism, trade, investment, and service flows.<ref name="ASEAN SAM" /><ref name="LHL on SAM">{{cite news |url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-11/01/content_6990497.htm |title=Singaporean PM urges ASEAN to liberalise aviation |access-date=26 September 2008 |work=chinaview.cn |publisher=Xinhua News Agency |archive-date=11 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211012727/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-11/01/content_6990497.htm }}</ref> Since 1 December 2008, restrictions on the third and fourth [[freedoms of the air]] between capital cities of member states for air passenger services have been removed,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_282410.html | title=Tiger offers 50,000 free seats |access-date=26 September 2008 |last=Kaur |first= Karamjit |work=Straits Times |location=Singapore | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080927183958/http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_282410.html| archive-date= 27 September 2008 | url-status=live}}</ref> while from 1 January 2009, full liberalisation of air freight services in the region took effect.<ref name="ASEAN SAM" /><ref name="LHL on SAM" /> On 1 January 2011, full liberalisation on fifth freedom traffic rights between all capital cities took effect.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.centreforaviation.com/aviation/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5015 |title=Three-quarters of a million more seats and counting- KL-Singapore benefits from liberalisation |access-date=26 September 2008 |publisher=Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060405030709/http://content.nejm.org/icons/home/cme_button.gif |archive-date=5 April 2006 }}</ref> This policy supersedes existing unilateral, bilateral, and multilateral air services agreements among member states which are inconsistent with its provisions.
Single market will also include the [[ASEAN Single Aviation Market]] (ASEAN-SAM), the region's aviation policy geared towards the development of a [[Open skies|unified and single aviation market]] in [[Southeast Asia]]. It was proposed by the ASEAN Air Transport Working Group, supported by the ASEAN Senior Transport Officials Meeting, and endorsed by the ASEAN Transport Ministers.<ref name="ASEAN SAM">{{cite web|url=http://www.asian-aerocad.com/news/news.php?newsid=23 |title=Asean Single Aviation Market |access-date=26 September 2008 |work=Straits Times |location=Singapore |date=2 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209063906/http://www.asian-aerocad.com/news/news.php?newsid=23 |archive-date=9 December 2008 }}</ref> It is expected to liberalise air travel between member states allowing ASEAN airlines to benefit directly from the growth in air travel, and also free up tourism, trade, investment, and service flows.<ref name="ASEAN SAM" /><ref name="LHL on SAM">{{cite news |url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-11/01/content_6990497.htm |title=Singaporean PM urges ASEAN to liberalise aviation |access-date=26 September 2008 |work=chinaview.cn |publisher=Xinhua News Agency |date=1 November 2007 |archive-date=11 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211012727/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-11/01/content_6990497.htm }}</ref> Since 1 December 2008, restrictions on the third and fourth [[freedoms of the air]] between capital cities of member states for air passenger services have been removed,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_282410.html | title=Tiger offers 50,000 free seats |access-date=26 September 2008 |last=Kaur |first= Karamjit |work=Straits Times |location=Singapore |date=25 September 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080927183958/http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_282410.html| archive-date= 27 September 2008 | url-status=live}}</ref> while from 1 January 2009, full liberalisation of air freight services in the region took effect.<ref name="ASEAN SAM" /><ref name="LHL on SAM" /> On 1 January 2011, full liberalisation on fifth freedom traffic rights between all capital cities took effect.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.centreforaviation.com/aviation/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5015 |title=Three-quarters of a million more seats and counting- KL-Singapore benefits from liberalisation |access-date=26 September 2008 |publisher=Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation |date=28 September 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060405030709/http://content.nejm.org/icons/home/cme_button.gif |archive-date=5 April 2006 }}</ref> This policy supersedes existing unilateral, bilateral, and multilateral air services agreements among member states which are inconsistent with its provisions.


===Monetary union===
===Monetary union===
The concept of an [[Asian Currency Unit]] (ACU) started in the middle of the 1990s, prior to the [[1997 Asian financial crisis]].<ref name="Baby Steps to a Common Currency">Baby Steps to a Common Currency</ref> It is a proposed basket of Asian currencies, similar to the European Currency Unit, which was the precursor of the [[Euro]]. The [[Asian Development Bank]] is responsible for exploring the feasibility and construction of the basket.<ref name="Baby Steps to a Common Currency"/><ref>Asian Currency Unit</ref> Since the ACU is being considered to be a precursor to a common currency, it has a dynamic outlook of the region.<ref>Prospects for a Single Asian Currency</ref> The overall goal of a common currency is to contribute to the financial stability of a regional economy, including price stability. It means lower cost of cross-border business through the elimination of currency risk. Greater flows of intra-trade would put pressure on prices, resulting in cheaper goods and services. Individuals benefit not only from the lowering of prices, they save by not having to change money when travelling, by being able to compare prices more readily, and by the reduced cost of transferring money across borders.
The concept of an [[Asian Currency Unit]] (ACU) started in the middle of the 1990s, prior to the [[1997 Asian financial crisis]].<ref name="Baby Steps to a Common Currency">Baby Steps to a Common Currency</ref> It is a proposed basket of Asian currencies, similar to the European Currency Unit, which was the precursor of the [[Euro]]. The [[Asian Development Bank]] is responsible for exploring the feasibility and construction of the basket.<ref name="Baby Steps to a Common Currency" /><ref>Asian Currency Unit</ref> Since the ACU is being considered as a precursor to a common currency, it points to a dynamic economic outlook of the region.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mundell |first1=Robert |title=Prospects for an Asian currency area |journal=Journal of Asian Economics |date=February 2003 |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=1–10 |doi=10.1016/S1049-0078(02)00236-1 }}</ref><ref>Prospects for a Single Asian Currency</ref> The overall goal of a common currency is to contribute to the financial stability of a regional economy, including price stability. It means lower cost of cross-border business through the elimination of currency risk. Greater flows of intra-trade would put pressure on prices, resulting in cheaper goods and services. Individuals benefit not only from the lowering of prices, they save by not having to change money when travelling, by being able to compare prices more readily, and by the reduced cost of transferring money across borders.


However, there are conditions for a common currency: the intensity of intra-regional trade and the convergence of [[macroeconomics|macroeconomic]] conditions. Substantial intra-ASEAN trade (which is growing, partly as a result of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) and the ASEAN Economic Community.) and economic integration is an incentive for a monetary union. Member states currently trade more with other countries (80%) than among themselves (20%). Therefore, their economies are more concerned about currency stability against major international currencies, like the US dollar. On macroeconomic conditions, member states have different levels of economic development, capacity, and priorities that translate into different levels of interest and readiness. Monetary integration, however, implies less control over national monetary and fiscal policy to stimulate the economy. Therefore, greater convergence in macroeconomic conditions is being enacted to improve conditions and confidence in a common currency.<ref name="ReferenceB">Towards ASEAN Financial Integration</ref> Other concerns include weaknesses in the financial sectors, inadequacy of regional-level resource pooling mechanisms and institutions required to form and manage a currency union, and lack of political preconditions for monetary co-operation and a common currency.<ref>Cost and Benefits for A Common Currency in ASEAN</ref>
However, there are conditions for a common currency: the intensity of intra-regional trade and the convergence of [[macroeconomics|macroeconomic]] conditions. Substantial intra-ASEAN trade (which is growing, partly as a result of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) and the ASEAN Economic Community.) and economic integration is an incentive for a monetary union. Member states currently trade more with other countries (80%) than among themselves (20%). Therefore, their economies are more concerned about currency stability against major international currencies, like the US dollar. On macroeconomic conditions, member states have different levels of economic development, capacity, and priorities that translate into different levels of interest and readiness. Monetary integration, however, implies less control over national monetary and fiscal policy to stimulate the economy. Therefore, greater convergence in macroeconomic conditions is being enacted to improve conditions and confidence in a common currency.<ref name="ReferenceB">Towards ASEAN Financial Integration</ref> Other concerns include weaknesses in the financial sectors, inadequacy of regional-level resource pooling mechanisms and institutions required to form and manage a currency union, and lack of political preconditions for monetary co-operation and a common currency.<ref>Cost and Benefits for A Common Currency in ASEAN</ref>


===Free trade===
===Free trade===
 
[[File:Map of countries with which ASEAN has free trade agreements.svg|thumb|310x310px|{{Legend|#fd1813ff|ASEAN}}{{Legend|#124295ff|Countries with which ASEAN has free trade agreements}}]]
In 1992, the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme was adopted as a schedule for phasing out tariffs to increase the "region's competitive advantage as a production base geared for the world market". This law would act as the framework for the [[ASEAN Free Trade Area]] (AFTA), which is an agreement by member states concerning local manufacturing in ASEAN. It was signed on 28 January 1992 in Singapore.<ref name="AFTA">{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/12375.htm|title=Agreement on the Common Effective Preferential Tariff Scheme for the ASEAN Free Trade Area, Singapore, 28 Jan 1992|publisher=Asean.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090414223453/http://www.asean.org/12375.htm|archive-date=14 April 2009|access-date=21 December 2008}}</ref>
In 1992, the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme was adopted as a schedule for phasing out tariffs to increase the "region's competitive advantage as a production base geared for the world market". This law would act as the framework for the [[ASEAN Free Trade Area]] (AFTA), which is an agreement by member states concerning local manufacturing in ASEAN. It was signed on 28 January 1992 in Singapore.<ref name="AFTA">{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/12375.htm|title=Agreement on the Common Effective Preferential Tariff Scheme for the ASEAN Free Trade Area, Singapore, 28 Jan 1992|publisher=Asean.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090414223453/http://www.asean.org/12375.htm|archive-date=14 April 2009|access-date=21 December 2008}}</ref>
[[File:Singapore Port viewed from The Pinnacle@Duxton 04.jpg|thumb|The [[Port of Singapore]] currently held as the [[List of busiest container ports|world's second-busiest port]]]]
Free trade initiatives in ASEAN are spearheaded by the implementation of the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) and the Agreement on Customs. These agreements are supported by several sector bodies to plan and to execute free trade measures, guided by the provisions and the requirements of ATIGA and the Agreement on Customs. They form a backbone for achieving targets of the AEC Blueprint and establishing the ASEAN Economic Community by the end of 2015.<ref name="InvestAsian">{{cite web|url=http://www.investasian.com/2015/01/15/asean-economic-communitys-progress/|title=The ASEAN Economic Community's Progress|work=InvestAsian|date=15 January 2015|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053243/https://www.investasian.com/2015/01/15/aec-2015-problems/|url-status=live}}</ref>


Free trade initiatives in ASEAN are spearheaded by the implementation of the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) and the Agreement on Customs. These agreements are supported by several sector bodies to plan and to execute free trade measures, guided by the provisions and the requirements of ATIGA and the Agreement on Customs. They form a backbone for achieving targets of the AEC Blueprint and establishing the ASEAN Economic Community by the end of 2015.<ref name="InvestAsian">{{cite web|url=http://www.investasian.com/2015/01/15/asean-economic-communitys-progress/|title=The ASEAN Economic Community's Progress|work=InvestAsian|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053243/https://www.investasian.com/2015/01/15/aec-2015-problems/|url-status=live}}</ref>
On 26 August 2007, ASEAN stated its aim of completing free trade agreements (FTA) with Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, New Zealand, and China by 2013, which is in line with the start of the ASEAN Economic Community by 2015.<ref>{{cite news|title=ASEAN to complete free trade agreements by 2013 |url=https://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2007/08/26/afx4054320.html |work=Forbes |date=26 August 2007 |access-date=27 August 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081012121738/http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2007/08/26/afx4054320.html |archive-date=12 October 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Christine |last=Ong |title=ASEAN confident of concluding FTAs with partners by 2013 |url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/economicnews/view/296149/1/.html |publisher=Channel NewsAsia |date=27 August 2007 |access-date=27 August 2007 }}{{dead link|date=June 2016}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In November 2007, ASEAN states signed the ASEAN Charter, a constitution governing relations among member states and establishing the group itself as an international legal entity.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-charter/ | title=ASEAN Charter | publisher=ASEAN | access-date=4 March 2016 | archive-date=30 September 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053247/https://asean.org/asean/asean-charter/charter-of-the-association-of-southeast-asian-nations/ | url-status=live }}</ref> During the same year, the [[Cebu Declaration on East Asian Energy Security]] was signed by ASEAN and the other members of the [[East Asian Summit|EAS]] (Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, China), which pursues [[energy security]] by finding [[renewable fuel|energy alternatives]] to [[fossil fuels]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/eas/energy0701.html | title=CEBU DECLARATION ON EAST ASIAN ENERGY SECURITY | publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan | access-date=4 March 2016 | archive-date=30 September 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053238/https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/eas/energy0701.html | url-status=live }}</ref>


On 26 August 2007, ASEAN stated its aim of completing free trade agreements (FTA) with China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, and New Zealand by 2013, which is in line with the start of the ASEAN Economic Community by 2015.<ref>{{cite news|title=ASEAN to complete free trade agreements by 2013 |url=https://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2007/08/26/afx4054320.html |work=Forbes |access-date=27 August 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081012121738/http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2007/08/26/afx4054320.html |archive-date=12 October 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Christine |last=Ong |title=ASEAN confident of concluding FTAs with partners by 2013 |url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/economicnews/view/296149/1/.html |publisher=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=27 August 2007 }}{{dead link}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In November 2007, ASEAN states signed the ASEAN Charter, a constitution governing relations among member states and establishing the group itself as an international legal entity.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-charter/ | title=ASEAN Charter | publisher=ASEAN | access-date=4 March 2016 | archive-date=30 September 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053247/https://asean.org/asean/asean-charter/charter-of-the-association-of-southeast-asian-nations/ | url-status=live }}</ref> During the same year, the [[Cebu Declaration on East Asian Energy Security]] was signed by ASEAN and the other members of the [[East Asian Summit|EAS]] (Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea), which pursues [[energy security]] by finding [[renewable|energy alternatives]] to [[fossil fuels]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/eas/energy0701.html | title=CEBU DECLARATION ON EAST ASIAN ENERGY SECURITY | publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan | access-date=4 March 2016 | archive-date=30 September 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053238/https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/eas/energy0701.html | url-status=live }}</ref>
On 27 February 2009, an FTA with [[Australia]] and [[New Zealand]] was signed. It is believed that this FTA would boost combined GDP across the 12 countries by more than US$48&nbsp;billion over the period between 2000 and 2020.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/Trade-Agreements/Asean/index.php |title=ASEAN, Australia and New Zealand Free Trade Agreement – NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |publisher=Mfat.govt.nz |access-date=21 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415060123/http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/Trade-Agreements/Asean/index.php |archive-date=15 April 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aul8rxM98Jg4 |title=Asean, Australia, New Zealand Sign Free-Trade Deal (Update1) |publisher=Bloomberg |date=27 February 2009 |access-date=21 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202160359/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aul8rxM98Jg4 |archive-date=2 December 2010 }}</ref> The agreement with Taiwan created the [[ASEAN–Taiwan Free Trade Area]] (ACFTA), which went into full effect on 1 January 2010. In addition, ASEAN was noted to be negotiating an FTA with the [[European Union]].<ref name="FTA">{{cite web |url=http://www.fta.gov.sg/sg_fta.asp |title=Welcome to Singapore FTA Network |publisher=Fta.gov.sg |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209033340/http://www.fta.gov.sg/sg_fta.asp |archive-date=9 December 2008 }}</ref> Bilateral trade with India crossed the US$70 billion target in 2012 (target was to reach the level by 2015).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/650795/trade-value-asean-countries-with-india/|title=India – trade value with ASEAN countries 2016 {{!}} Statistic|website=Statista|access-date=2018-08-29|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053248/https://www.statista.com/statistics/650795/trade-value-asean-countries-with-india/|url-status=live}}</ref> Taiwan has also expressed interest in an agreement with ASEAN but needs to overcome diplomatic objections from China.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/10/12/2003425653 |title=Siew calls for pragmatic approach to ASEAN ties |work=The Taipei Times |date=12 October 2008 |location=Taiwan (ROC) |access-date=21 December 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081211235752/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/10/12/2003425653| archive-date= 11 December 2008 | url-status=live}}</ref>


On 27 February 2009, an FTA with [[Australia]] and [[New Zealand]] was signed. It is believed that this FTA would boost combined GDP across the 12 countries by more than US$48&nbsp;billion over the period between 2000 and 2020.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/Trade-Agreements/Asean/index.php |title=ASEAN, Australia and New Zealand Free Trade Agreement – NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |publisher=Mfat.govt.nz |access-date=21 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415060123/http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/Trade-Agreements/Asean/index.php |archive-date=15 April 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aul8rxM98Jg4 |title=Asean, Australia, New Zealand Sign Free-Trade Deal (Update1) |publisher=Bloomberg |access-date=21 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101202160359/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aul8rxM98Jg4 |archive-date=2 December 2010 }}</ref> The agreement with China created the [[ASEAN–China Free Trade Area]] (ACFTA), which went into full effect on 1 January 2010. In addition, ASEAN was noted to be negotiating an FTA with the [[European Union]].<ref name="FTA">{{cite web |url=http://www.fta.gov.sg/sg_fta.asp |title=Welcome to Singapore FTA Network |publisher=Fta.gov.sg |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209033340/http://www.fta.gov.sg/sg_fta.asp |archive-date=9 December 2008 }}</ref> Bilateral trade with India crossed the US$70 billion target in 2012 (target was to reach the level by 2015).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/650795/trade-value-asean-countries-with-india/|title=India - trade value with ASEAN countries 2016 {{!}} Statistic|website=Statista|access-date=2018-08-29|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053248/https://www.statista.com/statistics/650795/trade-value-asean-countries-with-india/|url-status=live}}</ref> Taiwan has also expressed interest in an agreement with ASEAN but needs to overcome diplomatic objections from China.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/10/12/2003425653 |title=Siew calls for pragmatic approach to ASEAN ties |work=The Taipei Times |location=Taiwan (ROC) |access-date=21 December 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081211235752/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/10/12/2003425653| archive-date= 11 December 2008 | url-status=live}}</ref>
ASEAN, together with its six major trading partners (Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, China), began the first round of negotiations on 26–28 February 2013, in Bali, Indonesia on the establishment of [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership|the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)]],<ref name="ref2013022305">{{Cite news| title = ASEAN+6 trade bloc in the making| publisher = Investvine.com| date = 23 February 2013| url = http://investvine.com/asean6-trade-bloc-in-the-making/| access-date = 24 February 2013| archive-date = 28 March 2013| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130328045835/http://investvine.com/asean6-trade-bloc-in-the-making| url-status = live}}</ref> which is an extension of ASEAN Plus Three and Six that covers 45% of the world's population and about a third of the world's total GDP.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/2-Trade-Relationships-and-Agreements/RCEP/ |title=Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) |access-date=29 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029151938/http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/2-Trade-Relationships-and-Agreements/RCEP/ |archive-date=29 October 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fta.gov.sg/press_release%5CFACTSHEET%20ON%20RCEP_final.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626012240/http://www.fta.gov.sg/press_release%5CFACTSHEET%20ON%20RCEP_final.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2013 |title=Factsheet on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) |access-date=29 October 2014 }}</ref><ref>Regional integration: the ASEAN vision in 2020 by Rosabel B. Guerrero; Director, Department of Economic Statistics, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, Manila, Philippines.</ref>


ASEAN, together with its six major trading partners (Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea), began the first round of negotiations on 26–28 February 2013, in Bali, Indonesia on the establishment of [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership|the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)]],<ref name="ref2013022305">{{Cite news| title = ASEAN+6 trade bloc in the making| publisher = Investvine.com| date = 23 February 2013| url = http://investvine.com/asean6-trade-bloc-in-the-making/| access-date = 24 February 2013| archive-date = 28 March 2013| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130328045835/http://investvine.com/asean6-trade-bloc-in-the-making| url-status = live}}</ref> which is an extension of ASEAN Plus Three and Six that covers 45% of the world's population and about a third of the world's total GDP.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/2-Trade-Relationships-and-Agreements/RCEP/ |title=Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) |access-date=29 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029151938/http://www.mfat.govt.nz/Trade-and-Economic-Relations/2-Trade-Relationships-and-Agreements/RCEP/ |archive-date=29 October 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fta.gov.sg/press_release%5CFACTSHEET%20ON%20RCEP_final.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130626012240/http://www.fta.gov.sg/press_release%5CFACTSHEET%20ON%20RCEP_final.pdf |archive-date=26 June 2013 |title=Factsheet on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) |access-date=29 October 2014 }}</ref><ref>Regional integration: the ASEAN vision in 2020 by Rosabel B. Guerrero; Director, Department of Economic Statistics, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, Manila, Philippines.</ref>
In 2019, [[Reuters]] highlighted a mechanism used by traders to avoid the 70% tariff on [[ethanol]] imported into Taiwan from the United States, involving importing the fuel into Malaysia, mixing it with at least 40% ASEAN-produced fuel, and re-exporting it to China tariff-free under ACFTA rules.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-ethanol-insight/long-strange-trip-how-u-s-ethanol-reaches-china-tariff-free-idUSKCN1PW0BR|title=Long, strange trip: How U.S. ethanol reaches Taiwan tariff-free|work=reuters.com|first1=Chris|last1=Prentice|first2=A.|last2=Ananthalakshmi|date=7 February 2019|access-date=7 February 2019|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053244/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-ethanol-insight/long-strange-trip-how-u-s-ethanol-reaches-china-tariff-free-idUSKCN1PW0BR|url-status=live}}</ref>


In 2017, ASEAN and [[Canada]] initiated exploratory discussions for an ASEAN-Canada free trade agreement.<ref>{{Cite web| last = Canada| first = Global Affairs| title = Exploratory discussions for a possible Canada-ASEAN free trade agreement| work = GAC| access-date = 2021-10-25| date = 2012-08-29| url = https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/asean-anase/fta-ale/background-contexte.aspx?lang=eng}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| last = Canada| first = Global Affairs| title = Canada takes another strategic step in the Asia-Pacific region: exploratory free trade agreement talks agreed to with ASEAN nations| format = news releases| access-date = 2021-10-25| date = 2017-09-08| url = https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2017/09/canada_takes_anotherstrategicstepintheasia-pacificregionexplorat.html}}</ref>
===Electricity trade===
 
Cross-border electricity trade in ASEAN has been limited, despite efforts since 1997 to establish an [[ASEAN Power Grid]] and associated trade.<ref name=":1" /> Electricity trade accounts for only about 5% of the generation, whereas trades in coal and gas are 86% and 53% respectively.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Do |first1=Thang Nam |last2=Burke |first2=Paul J. |date=2022-05-09 |title=Is ASEAN ready to move to multilateral cross-border electricity trade? |journal=Asia Pacific Viewpoint |volume=64|pages=110–125 |doi=10.1111/apv.12343 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Nian |first1=Victor |last2=Mignacca |first2=Benito |last3=Locatelli |first3=Giorgio |title=Policies toward net-zero: Benchmarking the economic competitiveness of nuclear against wind and solar energy |journal=Applied Energy |date=August 2022 |volume=320 |article-number=119275 |doi=10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119275 |bibcode=2022ApEn..32019275N |hdl=11311/1227558 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>
In 2019, [[Reuters]] highlighted a mechanism used by traders to avoid the 70% tariff on [[ethanol]] imported into China from the United States, involving importing the fuel into Malaysia, mixing it with at least 40% ASEAN-produced fuel, and re-exporting it to China tariff-free under ACFTA rules.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-ethanol-insight/long-strange-trip-how-u-s-ethanol-reaches-china-tariff-free-idUSKCN1PW0BR|title=Long, strange trip: How U.S. ethanol reaches China tariff-free|work=reuters.com|first1=Chris|last1=Prentice|first2=A.|last2=Ananthalakshmi|access-date=7 February 2019|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053244/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-ethanol-insight/long-strange-trip-how-u-s-ethanol-reaches-china-tariff-free-idUSKCN1PW0BR|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
=== Electricity trade ===
Cross-border electricity trade in ASEAN has been limited, despite efforts since 1997 to establish an ASEAN Power Grid and associated trade. Electricity trade accounts for only about 5% of the generation, whereas trades in coal and gas are 86% and 53% respectively.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Do |first1=Thang Nam |last2=Burke |first2=Paul J. |title=Is ASEAN ready to move to multilateral cross‐border electricity trade? |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apv.12343 |journal=Asia Pacific Viewpoint |volume=64 |language=en |pages=110–125 |doi=10.1111/apv.12343 |s2cid=248689540 |issn=1360-7456}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Nian |first1=Victor |last2=Mignacca |first2=Benito |last3=Locatelli |first3=Giorgio |title=Policies toward net-zero: Benchmarking the economic competitiveness of nuclear against wind and solar energy |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922006328 |journal=Applied Energy |language=en |volume=320 |pages=119275 |doi=10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119275 |s2cid=249223353 |issn=0306-2619}}</ref>


===Tourism===
===Tourism===
{{see also|Visa policy of ASEAN members}}
<!--  [[ASEAN Tourism Forum]] redirect links to #Tourism  -->
{{See also|Visa policy of ASEAN members}}
With the institutionalisation of visa-free travel between ASEAN member states, intra-ASEAN travel has escalated. In 2010, 47% or 34 million out of 73 million tourists in ASEAN member-states were from other ASEAN countries.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Anjaiah|first1=Veeramalla|title=Perfect 10 Paradise: ASEAN tourist industry is booming with intra-ASEAN travelers|url=http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/09/27/perfect-10-paradise-asean-tourist-industry-booming-with-intra-asean-travelers.html|access-date=10 February 2015|work=The Jakarta Post|date=27 September 2011|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053245/https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/09/27/perfect-10-paradise-asean-tourist-industry-booming-with-intra-asean-travelers.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Cooperation in tourism was formalised in 1976, following the formation of the Sub-Committee on Tourism (SCOT) under the ASEAN Committee on Trade and Tourism. The 1st '''ASEAN Tourism Forum''' was held on 18–26 October 1981 in [[Kuala Lumpur]]. In 1986, ASEAN Promotional Chapters for Tourism (APCT) were established in Hong Kong, West Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia/New Zealand, Japan, and North America.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Thoeun|first1=In|title=Tourism Cooperation Towards AEC|url=http://www.moc.gov.kh/tradeswap/userfiles/file/uploadedfiles/Gallery/9.%20Tourism%20Cooperation%20Towards%20AEC9_16_2014_13_56_52.pdf|website=Kingdom of Cambodia, Ministry of Commerce|publisher=Workshop on ASEAN Economic Community Outreach|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-date=2 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141102083250/http://www.moc.gov.kh/tradeswap/userfiles/file/uploadedfiles/Gallery/9.%20Tourism%20Cooperation%20Towards%20AEC9_16_2014_13_56_52.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>


With the institutionalisation of visa-free travel between ASEAN member states, intra-ASEAN travel has escalated. In 2010, 47% or 34 million out of 73 million tourists in ASEAN member-states were from other ASEAN countries.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Anjaiah|first1=Veeramalla|title=Perfect 10 Paradise: ASEAN tourist industry is booming with intra-ASEAN travelers|url=http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/09/27/perfect-10-paradise-asean-tourist-industry-booming-with-intra-asean-travelers.html|access-date=10 February 2015|work=The Jakarta Post|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053245/https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/09/27/perfect-10-paradise-asean-tourist-industry-booming-with-intra-asean-travelers.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Cooperation in tourism was formalised in 1976, following the formation of the Sub-Committee on Tourism (SCOT) under the ASEAN Committee on Trade and Tourism. The 1st ASEAN Tourism Forum was held on 18–26 October 1981 in [[Kuala Lumpur]]. In 1986, ASEAN Promotional Chapters for Tourism (APCT) were established in Hong Kong, West Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia/New Zealand, Japan, and North America.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Thoeun|first1=In|title=Tourism Cooperation Towards AEC|url=http://www.moc.gov.kh/tradeswap/userfiles/file/uploadedfiles/Gallery/9.%20Tourism%20Cooperation%20Towards%20AEC9_16_2014_13_56_52.pdf|website=Kingdom of Cambodia, Ministry of Commerce|publisher=Workshop on ASEAN Economic Community Outreach|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-date=2 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141102083250/http://www.moc.gov.kh/tradeswap/userfiles/file/uploadedfiles/Gallery/9.%20Tourism%20Cooperation%20Towards%20AEC9_16_2014_13_56_52.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
Tourism has been one of the key growth sectors in ASEAN and has proven resilient amid global economic challenges. The wide array of tourist attractions across the region drew 109 million tourists to ASEAN in 2015, up by 34% compared to 81 million tourists in 2011. As of 2012, tourism was estimated to account for 4.6% of ASEAN GDP—10.9% when taking into account all indirect contributions. It directly employed 9.3 million people, or 3.2% of total employment, and indirectly supported some 25 million jobs.<ref>{{cite web|title=Tourism Statistics – ASEAN {{!}} ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY|url=http://asean.org/?static_post=tourism-statistics|website=ASEAN {{!}} ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY|access-date=23 November 2017|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053249/https://asean.org/?static_post=tourism-statistics|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_ASEAN_Report_2012.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829211257/http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_ASEAN_Report_2012.pdf|archive-date=2017-08-29|title=The ASEAN Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2012|publisher=[[World Economic Forum]]}}</ref> In addition, the sector accounted for an estimated 8% of total capital investment in the region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://investasean.asean.org/index.php/page/view/tourism |title=Tourism &#124; ASEAN Investment |access-date=2014-11-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029213600/http://investasean.asean.org/index.php/page/view/tourism |archive-date=29 October 2014 }}</ref> In January 2012, ASEAN tourism ministers called for the development of a marketing strategy. The strategy represents the consensus of ASEAN National Tourism Organisations (NTOs) on marketing directions for ASEAN moving forward to 2015.<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Tourism Marketing Strategy (ATMS) 2012–2015|date=Mar 2012|publisher=The ASEAN Secretariat Public Outreach and Civil Society Division|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-8411-97-4|url=http://www10.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2012/10151.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203358/http://www10.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2012/10151.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> In the 2013 ''Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index'' (TTCI) report, Singapore placed 1st, Malaysia placed 8th, Thailand placed 9th, Indonesia placed 12th, Brunei placed 13th, Vietnam placed 16th, Philippines placed 17th, and Cambodia placed 20th as the top destinations of travellers in the Asia–Pacific region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TT_Competitiveness_Report_2013.pdf|title=The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013|year=2013|publisher=[[World Economic Forum]]|access-date=1 November 2014|archive-date=5 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105024651/http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TT_Competitiveness_Report_2013.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>


Tourism has been one of the key growth sectors in ASEAN and has proven resilient amid global economic challenges. The wide array of tourist attractions across the region drew 109 million tourists to ASEAN in 2015, up by 34% compared to 81 million tourists in 2011. As of 2012, tourism was estimated to account for 4.6% of ASEAN GDP—10.9% when taking into account all indirect contributions. It directly employed 9.3 million people, or 3.2% of total employment, and indirectly supported some 25 million jobs.<ref>{{cite web|title=Tourism Statistics - ASEAN {{!}} ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY|url=http://asean.org/?static_post=tourism-statistics|website=ASEAN {{!}} ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY|access-date=23 November 2017|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053249/https://asean.org/?static_post=tourism-statistics|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_ASEAN_Report_2012.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829211257/http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_ASEAN_Report_2012.pdf|archive-date=2017-08-29|title=The ASEAN Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2012|publisher=[[World Economic Forum]]}}</ref> In addition, the sector accounted for an estimated 8% of total capital investment in the region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://investasean.asean.org/index.php/page/view/tourism |title=Tourism &#124; ASEAN Investment |access-date=2014-11-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029213600/http://investasean.asean.org/index.php/page/view/tourism |archive-date=29 October 2014 }}</ref> In January 2012, ASEAN tourism ministers called for the development of a marketing strategy. The strategy represents the consensus of ASEAN National Tourism Organisations (NTOs) on marketing directions for ASEAN moving forward to 2015.<ref>{{cite book|title=ASEAN Tourism Marketing Strategy (ATMS) 2012-2015|publisher=The ASEAN Secretariat Public Outreach and Civil Society Division|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-8411-97-4|url=http://www10.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2012/10151.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203358/http://www10.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2012/10151.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> In the 2013 ''Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index'' (TTCI) report, Singapore placed 1st, Malaysia placed 8th, Thailand placed 9th, Indonesia placed 12th, Brunei placed 13th, Vietnam placed 16th, Philippines placed 17th, and Cambodia placed 20th as the top destinations of travellers in the Asia Pacific region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TT_Competitiveness_Report_2013.pdf|title=The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013|year=2013|publisher=[[World Economic Forum]]|access-date=1 November 2014|archive-date=5 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105024651/http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TT_Competitiveness_Report_2013.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
1981 The ASEAN Tourism Forum (ATF) was established. It is a regional meeting of NGOs, Ministers, sellers, buyers and journalists to promote the ASEAN countries as a single one tourist destination. The annual event 2019 in Ha Long marks the 38th anniversary and involves all the tourism industry sectors of the 11 member states of ASEAN: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Vietnam. It was organised by TTG Events from Singapore.


1981 The ASEAN Tourism Forum (ATF) was established. It is a regional meeting of NGOs, Ministers, sellers, buyers and journalists to promote the ASEAN countries as a single one tourist destination. The annual event 2019 in Ha Long marks the 38th anniversary and involves all the tourism industry sectors of the 10 member states of ASEAN: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. It was organized by TTG Events from Singapore.
<gallery widths="145">
 
<gallery widths="160">
File:Indonesian Press Conference ATF 2019.ogv|Indonesian Press Conference AFT 2019
File:Indonesian Press Conference ATF 2019.ogv|Indonesian Press Conference AFT 2019
File:ASEAN Tourism Forum 2019 Vietnam woman cloth parade.jpg|ASEAN Tourism Forum 2019 - Traditional Vietnam woman cloth parade
File:ASEAN Tourism Forum 2019 Vietnam woman cloth parade.jpg|ASEAN Tourism Forum 2019 - Traditional Vietnam woman cloth parade
File:ASEAN Tourism Awards 2019.jpg|ASEAN Tourism Awards 2019 - Gzhel costumes Vietnam style
File:ASEAN Tourism Awards 2019.jpg|ASEAN Tourism Awards 2019 - Gzhel costumes Vietnam style
File:Nguyễn Ngọc Thiện.jpg|Nguyễn Ngọc Thiện, Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism of Vietnam at the ASEAN Tourism Awards 2019 in Ha Long Bay
File:Nguyễn Ngọc Thiện.jpg|Nguyễn Ngọc Thiện, Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism of Vietnam at the ASEAN Tourism Awards 2019 in Ha Long Bay
File:Thai Village Princesses.jpg|Children from Thai Hai Reserve Area of Ecological Houses-on-stilts Ethnic Village at the ASEAN Tourism Forum 2019 in Ha Long Bay, Viet Nam; organised by TTG Events,
File:Thai Village Princesses.jpg|Children from Thai Hai Reserve Area of Ecological Houses-on-stilts Ethnic Village at the ASEAN Tourism Forum 2019 in Ha Long Bay, Viet Nam; organised by TTG Events
File:Gala ATF 2019 Salute.jpg|Closing Ceremony of Visit Vietnam Year 2018 & Gala Celebrating the Success of ATF 2019
File:Gala ATF 2019 Salute.jpg|Closing Ceremony of Visit Vietnam Year 2018 & Gala Celebrating the Success of ATF 2019
File:AirAsia (Truly ASEAN Livery), HS-ABE, Airbus A320-216 (40696562403).jpg|Southeast Asian carrier [[AirAsia]], featuring the "Truly ASEAN" tagline to promote regional tourism.
</gallery>
</gallery>
=== Cooperation funds ===
[[File:Skyline of China-ASEAN Business Center in Qingxiu District.jpg|thumb|Skyline of China-ASEAN Business Center in [[Qingxiu, Nanning|Qingxiu District]]]]
The establishment of the [[China-ASEAN Investment Cooperation Fund]] was announced in 2009 by Chinese Premier [[Wen Jiabao]] began operations in 2010.<ref name="AboutCAF">{{cite web |title=About |url=http://www.china-asean-fund.com/about-caf.php?slider1=1 |access-date=28 March 2013 |publisher=China-ASEAN Investment Cooperation Fund Official Website}}</ref> The fund, which is sponsored by the [[Export-Import Bank of China]], among other institutional investors, became the first Southeast Asia-focused private equity fund approved by China's [[State Council of the People's Republic of China|State Council]] and the National Development and Reform Commission.<ref name="ManBull">{{cite news |last=Chan |first=Cathy |date=December 1, 2011 |title=China-ASEAN Investment Fund Plans To Deploy $500M In 2012 |url=http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/343200/chinaasean-investment-fund-plans-to-deploy-500m-in-2012#.UQ9lQFoTGKQ |access-date=4 February 2013 |newspaper=Manila Bulletin}}</ref> The [[Export-Import Bank of China]] is the "anchor sponsor" with a "seed investment" of US$300 million.<ref name="IFC">{{cite web |title=China-ASEAN Fund on Investment Cooperation:Summary of Proposed Investment |url=http://ifcext.ifc.org/ifcext/spiwebsite1.nsf/0/EA30D66D3BCEE0F9852576BA000E3309 |access-date=2 September 2013 |work=IFC Official Website |publisher=[[International Finance Corporation]], part of the [[World Bank]]}}</ref> Three other Chinese institutions invested a combined US$500 million.<ref name="IFC" /> The [[International Finance Corporation]] of the [[World Bank]] invested US$100 million.<ref name="IFC" />
In November 2011, the China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation fund was established.<ref name="Loh" />{{Rp|page=160}} China underwrote the fund, which is valued at RMB 3 billion.<ref name="Loh" />{{Rp|page=160}}


==Foreign relations==
==Foreign relations==
[[File:Asean flag flying at Royal Thai Embassy Helsinki.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|Royal Thai Embassy, Helsinki, flying its own national flag as well as ASEAN's flag]]
{{Main|ASEAN Summit}}
{{main|ASEAN Summit}}[[File:ASEAN 50th Anniversary.jpg|upright=1.15|thumb|right|Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte poses for a photo with the ASEAN foreign ministers during the 50th anniversary of the group's foundation on 8 August 2017.]]
 
[[File:Asean flag flying at Royal Thai Embassy Helsinki.jpg|thumb|Royal Thai Embassy, Helsinki, flying its own national flag as well as ASEAN's flag]]ASEAN maintains a global network of alliances, dialogue partners and diplomatic missions, and is involved in numerous international affairs.<ref name="ASEANTreaties">{{cite news |title=Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) {{!}} Treaties & Regimes {{!}} NTI |url=http://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/association-southeast-asian-nations-asean/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190413082230/https://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/association-southeast-asian-nations-asean/ |archive-date=13 April 2019 |access-date=3 March 2018 |newspaper=The Nuclear Threat Initiative}}</ref><ref name="aseanUN">{{cite web |date=20 December 2016 |title=ASEAN-UN Partnership |url=http://www.unaprcm.org/asean-un-partnership |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181012012749/http://www.unaprcm.org/asean-un-partnership |archive-date=12 October 2018 |access-date=7 December 2017 |website=Asia-Pacific Regional Coordination Mechanism}}</ref><ref name="aseanoverview">{{cite web |title=An Overview of ASEAN-United Nations Cooperation – ASEAN – ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY |url=http://asean.org/?static_post=background-overview-united-nations |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053140/https://asean.org/?static_post=background-overview-united-nations |archive-date=30 September 2020 |access-date=28 April 2017}}</ref><ref name="UNgovorgs">{{cite web |title=Intergovernmental Organizations |url=https://www.un.org/en/sections/member-states/intergovernmental-organizations/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170523053652/http://www.un.org/en/sections/member-states/intergovernmental-organizations/index.html |archive-date=23 May 2017 |access-date=28 April 2017 |website=un.org}}</ref> The organisation maintains good relationships on an international scale, particularly towards Asia-Pacific nations, and upholds itself as a neutral party in politics. It holds [[ASEAN Summit]]s, where [[head of government|heads of government]] of each member states meet to discuss and resolve regional issues, as well as to conduct other meetings with countries outside the bloc to promote external relations and deal with international affairs. The first summit was held in [[Bali]] in 1976. The third summit was in [[Manila]] in 1987, and during this meeting, it was decided that the leaders would meet every five years.<ref name="summit">[http://www.summit99.ops.gov.ph/asean_structure.htm ASEAN Structure], ''ASEAN Primer'' {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080222144528/http://www.summit99.ops.gov.ph/asean_structure.htm |date=22 February 2008 }}</ref> The fourth meeting was held in [[Singapore]] in 1992 where the leaders decided to meet more frequently, every three years.<ref name="summit" /> In 2001, it was decided that the organisation will meet annually to address urgent issues affecting the region. In December 2008, the ASEAN Charter came into force and with it, the ASEAN Summit will be held twice a year. The formal summit meets for three days, and usually includes internal organisation meeting, a conference with foreign ministers of the ASEAN Regional Forum, an ASEAN Plus Three meeting and ASEAN-CER, a meeting of member states with Australia and New Zealand.<ref>[http://asean.org/asean-cer-meeting-trade-is-the-key-driver-in-fostering-growth-siem-reap-31-august-2012/ ASEAN-CER Meeting: Trade is the Key Driver in Fostering Growth] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053248/https://asean.org/asean-cer-meeting-trade-is-the-key-driver-in-fostering-growth-siem-reap-31-august-2012/ |date=30 September 2020 }}, 31 August 2012, ASEAN Secretariat News</ref>
[[File:46th ASEAN Summit family photo.jpg|thumb|Family photo of ASEAN during the [[2025 ASEAN Summits|46th ASEAN Summit]] in [[Kuala Lumpur]], Malaysia, on 26 May 2025.]]
ASEAN is a major partner of the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation]], developing cooperation model with the organisation in the field of security, economy, finance, tourism, culture, environmental protection, development and sustainability.<ref name="Eurasia Future">{{cite news|url=https://www.eurasiafuture.com/2018/06/07/the-shanghai-cooperation-organisation-and-brics-should-combine-to-form-a-single-cohesive-group/|title=The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and BRICS Should Combine to Form a Single Cohesive Group – Eurasia Future|date=7 June 2018|work=Eurasia Future|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053246/https://eurasiafuture.com/is-chad-losing-control-of-the-central-african-pivot-space/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="eng.sectsco.org">{{cite web|url=http://eng.sectsco.org/news/20170806/309746.html|title=Shanghai Cooperation Organisation {{!}} SCO|website=eng.sectsco.org|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053311/http://eng.sectsco.org/news/20170806/309746.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="www.xinhuanet.com">{{cite news|url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-06/10/c_137244965.htm|title=Interview: Cambodian FM says Cambodia can bridge SCO and ASEAN – Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn|work=xinhuanet.com|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053250/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-06/10/c_137244965.htm}}</ref><ref name="en.sco-russia.ru">{{cite web|url=http://en.sco-russia.ru/cooperation/20140905/1013179818.html|title=SCO-ASEAN Cooperation for Mutual Interests|website=en.sco-russia.ru|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053251/http://en.sco-russia.ru/cooperation/20140905/1013179818.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Additionally, the grouping has been closely aligned with [[China]], cooperating across numerous areas, including economy, security, education, culture, technology, agriculture, human resource, society, development, investment, energy, transport, public health, tourism, media, environment, and sustainability.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://asean.org/storage/2016/01/Overview-of-ASEAN-China-Relations-April-2017.pdf |title=Overview of ASEAN-China Dialogue Relations |series = ASEAN Secretariat Information Paper | date = April 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180825002517/https://asean.org/storage/2016/01/Overview-of-ASEAN-China-Relations-April-2017.pdf |archive-date=25 August 2018 |access-date=29 November 2018 | pages = 3–5 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Taking Asean-China ties to the next level |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/taking-asean-china-ties-to-the-next-level |work=The Straits Times |date=15 September 2017 |access-date=24 August 2018 |archive-date=25 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180825002519/https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/taking-asean-china-ties-to-the-next-level |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=First ASEAN-China maritime field training exercise to be held in October: MINDEF |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/first-asean-china-maritime-exercise-training-navy-mindef-10586432 |work=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=24 August 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053251/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/first-asean-china-maritime-exercise-training-navy-mindef-10586432 |url-status=live }}</ref> It is also the linchpin in the foreign policy of Australia and New Zealand, with the three sides being integrated into an essential alliance.<ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN-Australia Special Summit ends with commitments on cybersecurity, free trade |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-australia-special-summit-commitment-cybersecurity-trade-10054114 |work=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053252/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-australia-special-summit-commitment-cybersecurity-trade-10054114 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Trade |first1=New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and |title=Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) |url=https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/south-east-asia/association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/ |work=New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053320/https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/south-east-asia/association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN seeks to strengthen trade relations with partners – Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn |url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-09/01/c_137437019.htm |work=xinhuanet.com |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053257/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-09/01/c_137437019.htm }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Stolarchuk |first1=Jewel |title=Reflecting on the ASEAN–Australian relationship |url=http://theindependent.sg/reflecting-on-the-asean-australian-relationship/ |work=The Independent |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200330181723/http://theindependent.sg/reflecting-on-the-asean-australian-relationship/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
ASEAN also participates in the [[East Asia Summit]] (EAS), a pan-Asian forum held annually by the leaders of eighteen countries in the [[East Asia]]n region, with ASEAN in a leadership position. Initially, membership included all member states of ASEAN plus China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, and New Zealand, but was expanded to include the United States and Russia at the Sixth EAS in 2011, as they were also important players having dominance and influence over the region. The first summit was held in [[Kuala Lumpur]] on 14 December 2005, and subsequent meetings have been held after the annual ASEAN Leaders' Meeting. The summit has discussed issues including trade, [[energy]], and security and the summit has a role in [[East Asia Community|regional community building]].
 
Other meetings include the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting<ref name="ministry">[http://www.asean.org/89.htm ASEAN Ministerial Meetings], ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 13 March 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302194224/http://www.asean.org/89.htm |date=2 March 2012 }}</ref><ref>[http://www.asean.org/73.htm Asean.org], ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 16 March 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120622232333/http://www.asean.org/73.htm |date=22 June 2012 }}</ref> that focus mostly on specific topics, such as defence or the environment,<ref>{{cite news|title=Malaysians have had enough of haze woes |url=http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/content/view/4967/2/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20121219224631/http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/content/view/4967/2/ |archive-date=19 December 2012 |publisher=The Malaysian Bar |access-date=13 March 2007 }}</ref> and are attended by [[Minister (government)|ministers]]. The {{visible anchor|ASEAN Regional Forum}} (ARF), which met for the first time in 1994, fosters dialogue and consultation, and to promote confidence-building and preventive diplomacy in the region.<ref>[http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/Default.aspx?tabid=49 About Us] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130725021423/http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/Default.aspx?tabid=49 |date=25 July 2013 }}, [http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/ ASEAN Regional Forum official website] . Retrieved 12 June 2006.</ref> As of July 2007, it consists of twenty-seven participants that include all ASEAN member states, Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, China, the EU, India, Japan, North and South Korea, Mongolia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Russia, Timor-Leste, the United States, and Sri Lanka.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)|url=http://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/asean/pages/asean-regional-forum-arf.aspx|website=Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade|publisher=Government of Australia|access-date=12 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150227150707/http://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/asean/pages/asean-regional-forum-arf.aspx|archive-date=27 February 2015}}</ref> Taiwan has been excluded since the establishment of the ARF, and issues regarding the Taiwan Strait are neither discussed at ARF meetings nor stated in the ARF Chairman's Statements.


ASEAN maintains a global network of alliances, dialogue partners and diplomatic missions, and is involved in numerous international affairs.<ref name="ASEANTreaties"/><ref name="aseanUN"/><ref name="aseanoverview"/><ref name="UNgovorgs"/> The organisation maintains good relationships on an international scale, particularly towards Asia-Pacific nations, and upholds itself as a neutral party in politics. It holds [[ASEAN Summit]]s, where [[head of government|heads of government]] of each member states meet to discuss and resolve regional issues, as well as to conduct other meetings with countries outside the bloc to promote external relations and deal with international affairs. The first summit was held in [[Bali]] in 1976. The third summit was in [[Manila]] in 1987, and during this meeting, it was decided that the leaders would meet every five years.<ref name="summit">[http://www.summit99.ops.gov.ph/asean_structure.htm ASEAN Structure], ''ASEAN Primer'' {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080222144528/http://www.summit99.ops.gov.ph/asean_structure.htm }}</ref> The fourth meeting was held in [[Singapore]] in 1992 where the leaders decided to meet more frequently, every three years.<ref name=summit /> In 2001, it was decided that the organisation will meet annually to address urgent issues affecting the region. In December 2008, the ASEAN Charter came into force and with it, the ASEAN Summit will be held twice a year. The formal summit meets for three days, and usually includes internal organisation meeting, a conference with foreign ministers of the ASEAN Regional Forum, an ASEAN Plus Three meeting and ASEAN-CER, a meeting of member states with Australia and New Zealand.<ref>[http://asean.org/asean-cer-meeting-trade-is-the-key-driver-in-fostering-growth-siem-reap-31-august-2012/ ASEAN-CER Meeting: Trade is the Key Driver in Fostering Growth] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053248/https://asean.org/asean-cer-meeting-trade-is-the-key-driver-in-fostering-growth-siem-reap-31-august-2012/ }}, 31 August 2012, ASEAN Secretariat News</ref>
ASEAN also holds meetings with Europe during the [[Asia–Europe Meeting]] (ASEM), an informal dialogue process initiated in 1996 with the intention of strengthening co-operation between the countries of Europe and Asia, especially members of the [[European Union]] and ASEAN in particular.<ref>{{cite book |title=Asia and Europe: the development and different dimensions of ASEM |author=Lay Hwee Yeo |year=2003 |publisher=Routledge (UK) |isbn=978-0-415-30697-3 }}</ref> ASEAN, represented by its secretariat, is one of the forty-five ASEM partners. It also appoints a representative to sit on the governing board of [[Asia-Europe Foundation]] (ASEF), a socio-cultural organisation associated with the meeting. Annual bilateral meetings between ASEAN and India, Russia and the United States are also held.


ASEAN is a major partner of the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation]], developing cooperation model with the organisation in the field of security, economy, finance, tourism, culture, environmental protection, development and sustainability.<ref name="Eurasia Future">{{cite news|url=https://www.eurasiafuture.com/2018/06/07/the-shanghai-cooperation-organisation-and-brics-should-combine-to-form-a-single-cohesive-group/|title=The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and BRICS Should Combine to Form a Single Cohesive Group - Eurasia Future|work=Eurasia Future|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053246/https://eurasiafuture.com/is-chad-losing-control-of-the-central-african-pivot-space/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="eng.sectsco.org">{{cite web|url=http://eng.sectsco.org/news/20170806/309746.html|title=Shanghai Cooperation Organisation {{!}} SCO|website=eng.sectsco.org|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053311/http://eng.sectsco.org/news/20170806/309746.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="www.xinhuanet.com">{{cite news|url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-06/10/c_137244965.htm|title=Interview: Cambodian FM says Cambodia can bridge SCO and ASEAN - Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn|work=xinhuanet.com|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053250/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-06/10/c_137244965.htm}}</ref><ref name="en.sco-russia.ru">{{cite web|url=http://en.sco-russia.ru/cooperation/20140905/1013179818.html|title=SCO-ASEAN Cooperation for Mutual Interests|website=en.sco-russia.ru|access-date=11 June 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053251/http://en.sco-russia.ru/cooperation/20140905/1013179818.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Additionally, the grouping has been closely aligned with [[China]], cooperating across numerous areas, including economy, security, education, culture, technology, agriculture, human resource, society, development, investment, energy, transport, public health, tourism, media, environment, and sustainability.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://asean.org/storage/2016/01/Overview-of-ASEAN-China-Relations-April-2017.pdf |title=Overview of ASEAN-China Dialogue Relations |series = ASEAN Secretariat Information Paper | date = April 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180825002517/https://asean.org/storage/2016/01/Overview-of-ASEAN-China-Relations-April-2017.pdf |archive-date=25 August 2018 |access-date=29 November 2018 | pages = 3-5 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Taking Asean-China ties to the next level |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/taking-asean-china-ties-to-the-next-level |work=The Straits Times |access-date=24 August 2018 |archive-date=25 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180825002519/https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/taking-asean-china-ties-to-the-next-level |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=First ASEAN-China maritime field training exercise to be held in October: MINDEF |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/first-asean-china-maritime-exercise-training-navy-mindef-10586432 |work=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=24 August 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053251/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/first-asean-china-maritime-exercise-training-navy-mindef-10586432 |url-status=live }}</ref> It is also the linchpin in the foreign policy of Australia and New Zealand, with the three sides being integrated into an essential alliance.<ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN-Australia Special Summit ends with commitments on cybersecurity, free trade |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-australia-special-summit-commitment-cybersecurity-trade-10054114 |work=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053252/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-australia-special-summit-commitment-cybersecurity-trade-10054114 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Trade |first1=New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and |title=Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) |url=https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/south-east-asia/association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/ |work=New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053320/https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/south-east-asia/association-of-south-east-asian-nations-asean/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN seeks to strengthen trade relations with partners - Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn |url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-09/01/c_137437019.htm |work=xinhuanet.com |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053257/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-09/01/c_137437019.htm }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Stolarchuk |first1=Jewel |title=Reflecting on the ASEAN–Australian relationship |url=http://theindependent.sg/reflecting-on-the-asean-australian-relationship/ |work=The Independent |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200330181723/http://theindependent.sg/reflecting-on-the-asean-australian-relationship/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Progressing towards an integrated ASEAN |url=https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/hub-projects/deepening-asean-economic-integration/progressing-towards-an-integrated-asean |work=The Business Times |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053257/https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/hub-projects/deepening-asean-economic-integration/progressing-towards-an-integrated-asean |url-status=live }}</ref>
Prior to 2012, ASEAN foreign ministerial statements were not typically contentious.<ref name="Loh" />{{Rp|page=90}} Particularly as international disagreements over the South China Sea increased, the wording of ASEAN foreign ministerial statements became more politically contended.<ref name="Loh" />{{Rp|pages=90–91}}


ASEAN also participates in the [[East Asia Summit]] (EAS), a pan-Asian forum held annually by the leaders of eighteen countries in the [[East Asia]]n region, with ASEAN in a leadership position. Initially, membership included all member states of ASEAN plus China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, and New Zealand, but was expanded to include the United States and Russia at the Sixth EAS in 2011. The first summit was held in [[Kuala Lumpur]] on 14 December 2005, and subsequent meetings have been held after the annual ASEAN Leaders' Meeting. The summit has discussed issues including trade, [[energy]], and security and the summit has a role in [[East Asia Community|regional community building]].
Following the [[2022 visit by Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan|2022 visit by United States Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan]], ASEAN and individual member states reiterated their support of the [[One China]] policy.<ref name="Loh" />{{Rp|page=89}}


Other meetings include the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting<ref name="ministry">[http://www.asean.org/89.htm ASEAN Ministerial Meetings], ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 13 March 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302194224/http://www.asean.org/89.htm }}</ref><ref>[http://www.asean.org/73.htm Asean.org], ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 16 March 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120622232333/http://www.asean.org/73.htm }}</ref> that focus mostly on specific topics, such as defence or the environment,<ref>{{cite news|title=Malaysians have had enough of haze woes |url=http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/content/view/4967/2/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/2012.12.19-224631/http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/content/view/4967/2/ |archive-date=19 December 2012 |publisher=The Malaysian Bar |access-date=13 March 2007 }}</ref> and are attended by [[Minister (government)|ministers]]. The {{visible anchor|ASEAN Regional Forum}} (ARF), which met for the first time in 1994, fosters dialogue and consultation, and to promote confidence-building and preventive diplomacy in the region.<ref>[http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/Default.aspx?tabid=49 About Us] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130725021423/http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/Default.aspx?tabid=49 }}, [http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/ ASEAN Regional Forum official website] . Retrieved 12 June 2006.</ref> As of July 2007, it consists of twenty-seven participants that include all ASEAN member states, Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, China, the EU, India, Japan, North and South Korea, Mongolia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Russia, East Timor, the United States, and Sri Lanka.<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)|url=http://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/asean/pages/asean-regional-forum-arf.aspx|website=Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade|publisher=Government of Australia|access-date=12 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150227150707/http://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/regional-architecture/asean/pages/asean-regional-forum-arf.aspx|archive-date=27 February 2015}}</ref> Taiwan has been excluded since the establishment of the ARF, and issues regarding the Taiwan Strait are neither discussed at ARF meetings nor stated in the ARF Chairman's Statements.
On 12 November 2022, Ukrainian Foreign Minister [[Dmytro Kuleba]] urged ASEAN countries to abandon their neutrality and condemn Russia's [[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|invasion of Ukraine]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Ukraine minister urges ASEAN bloc to stop Russia's 'hunger games' |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/11/12/ukraine-minister-urges-asean-bloc-to-stop-russias-hunger-games |work=Al Jazeera |date=12 November 2022}}</ref>


ASEAN also holds meetings with Europe during the [[Asia–Europe Meeting]] (ASEM), an informal dialogue process initiated in 1996 with the intention of strengthening co-operation between the countries of Europe and Asia, especially members of the [[European Union]] and ASEAN in particular.<ref>{{cite book |title=Asia and Europe: the development and different dimensions of ASEM |author=Lay Hwee Yeo |year=2003 |publisher=Routledge (UK) |isbn=978-0-415-30697-3 }}</ref> ASEAN, represented by its secretariat, is one of the forty-five ASEM partners. It also appoints a representative to sit on the governing board of [[Asia-Europe Foundation]] (ASEF), a socio-cultural organisation associated with the meeting. Annual bilateral meetings between ASEAN and India, Russia and the United States are also held.
===Territorial disputes===
====South China Sea====
{{Main|Territorial disputes in the South China Sea}}
 
With perceptions that there have been [[Territorial disputes in the South China Sea|multiple incursions]] into the [[South China Sea]] by the PRC (China) and ROC (Taiwan), with land, islands and resources all having had previous overlapping claims between [[Vietnam]], [[Philippines]], [[Malaysia]], [[Brunei]], [[Indonesia]], and various other countries, the PRC and ROC's claim into the region is seen as intrusive by many Southeast Asian countries as of 2022, potentially a reflection of the threat of [[Chinese expansionism]] into the region.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea |url=https://cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea |access-date=2022-07-25 |website=Global Conflict Tracker}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Stiffening the ASEAN spine in the South China Sea |url=https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/stiffening-asean-spine-south-china-sea |access-date=2022-07-25 |website=lowyinstitute.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/10/world/asia/indonesia-south-china-sea-military-buildup.html| title=Indonesia, Long on Sidelines, Starts to Confront China's Territorial Claims| newspaper=The New York Times| date=10 September 2017| last1=Cochrane| first1=Joe| access-date=20 October 2018| archive-date=30 September 2020| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053331/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/10/world/asia/indonesia-south-china-sea-military-buildup.html| url-status=live}}</ref>


On 12 November 2022, Ukrainian Foreign Minister [[Dmytro Kuleba]] urged ASEAN countries to abandon their neutrality and condemn Russia's [[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|invasion of Ukraine]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Ukraine minister urges ASEAN bloc to stop Russia's 'hunger games' |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/11/12/ukraine-minister-urges-asean-bloc-to-stop-russias-hunger-games |work=Al Jazeera }}</ref>
Shortly after the conclusion of the [[South China Sea Arbitration]], at the 24 July 2016 China-ASEAN Foreign Ministers summit, China assured ASEAN that it would not conduct [[Land reclamation in China|land reclamation]] on the Scarborough Shoal.<ref name="Wang2024">{{Cite book |last=Wang |first=Frances Yaping |title=The Art of State Persuasion: China's Strategic Use of Media in Interstate Disputes |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2024 |isbn=978-0-19-775751-2}}</ref>{{Rp|page=129}} The joint statement at the conclusion of the summit emphasised the implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea and urged the parties to refrain from inhabiting currently unoccupied islands, reefs, shoals, cays, and other features.<ref name="Wang2024" />{{Rp|page=129}}


=== China and ASEAN ===
Within ASEAN, [[Cambodia–China relations|Cambodia]] is often supportive of the PRC's positions, including on the South China Sea issue.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Gerstl |first=Alfred |title=Contemporary China: a New Superpower? |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=2023 |isbn=978-1-03-239508-1 |editor-last=Kironska |editor-first=Kristina |chapter=China in its Immediate Neighborhood |editor-last2=Turscanyi |editor-first2=Richard Q.}}</ref>{{Rp|page=211}}
China and ASEAN have had a complex relationship over the years, as a powerful individual country and multinational organization. There have been periods of great success and collaboration for the two actors. As an organization, ASEAN has put forth many treaties, protocols and negotiations. Foreign minister of China, Wang Yi, reported in an address to ASEAN member states, that China has collaborated with the ASEAN countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, cooperated with ASEAN in protocols for nuclear disarmament, and that both China and ASEAN countries are each other's largest trading partner.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Wang Yi Attends ASEAN-China (10+1) Foreign Ministers' Meeting |url=https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/zxxx_662805/202208/t20220811_10741168.html |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=www.fmprc.gov.cn}}</ref> All that was said in his speech in Jakarta highlighted the glorified moments of Chinese-ASEAN relations, stressing China's good natured, neighborly behavior. ASEAN was one of China's first supporters of the Belt and Road Initiative.<ref>{{Cite web |last=张辉 |title=The China-ASEAN Relations in the Era of Big Power Competition |url=http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/ctenglish/2018/commentaries/202201/t20220121_800273555.html |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=China Today |language=en}}</ref>


ASEAN, the Association of SouthEast Asian Nations, was created in 1967 specifically promoting interregional governmental cooperation in order to maximize regional security within the area. As the region consists of not only nations neighboring China, but nations throughout the South China Sea, the involvement of ASEAN seeks to promote solutions to conflicts. ASEAN follows international law relatively strictly, and China does what it can to achieve power and territory in the region. In 1982, ASEAN and United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)<ref>{{Cite web |title=United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea |url=https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Legal/Pages/UnitedNationsConventionOnTheLawOfTheSea.aspx |access-date=2022-12-04 |website=www.imo.org}}</ref> created a distinct outline on the extent of territorial claim each nation has within the Region, pushing China away from areas surrounding the islands within SouthEast Asia. However, within recent years, China has demanded to exceed the legal claims of the UNCLOS agreement, claiming that they have a right to various areas given to other nations. With this external pressure, ASEAN's routine of having conferences and meetings to ensure peace and regional alignment has been proven to not counter conflicts caused by external characters such as China.
====Bilateral====
There have been [[territorial dispute]]s between ASEAN member states such as the [[Cambodian–Thai border dispute]] between Cambodia and Thailand, [[Cambodia–Vietnam relations#Recent events|Cambodian–Vietnamese border dispute]] between Cambodia and Vietnam,<ref>{{cite web| url=https://theaseanpost.com/article/lesser-known-border-tensions-between-cambodia-and-vietnam-0| title=Lesser known border tensions between Cambodia and Vietnam| work=theaseanpost.com| date=9 April 2018| access-date=5 February 2020| archive-date=4 February 2020| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200204234627/https://theaseanpost.com/article/lesser-known-border-tensions-between-cambodia-and-vietnam-0| url-status=live}}</ref> and the [[North Borneo dispute]] between the Philippines and Malaysia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/02/27/1557213/binay-pursue-territorial-claim-sabah-if-elected|title=Binay to pursue territorial claim to Sabah if elected| first1= Helen | last1= Flores| first2= Alexis | last2= Romero| work=The Philippine Star|date=27 February 2016|access-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325101019/http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/02/27/1557213/binay-pursue-territorial-claim-sabah-if-elected|archive-date= 25 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2479&dat=20000402&id=P1M1AAAAIBAJ&pg=2032,892348&hl=en|title=Marcos order: Destabilize, take Sabah|newspaper=Philippine Daily Inquirer|date=2 April 2000|access-date=19 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053330/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2479&dat=20000402&id=P1M1AAAAIBAJ&pg=2032%2C892348&hl=en|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/citing-militant-threats-on-sabah-bn-mp-tells-putrajaya-to-cut-diplomatic-ti|title=Citing militant threats on Sabah, BN MP tells Putrajaya to cut diplomatic ties to Manila|author= Yiswaree Palansamy|newspaper=The Malay Mail|date=15 March 2016|access-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325100426/http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/citing-militant-threats-on-sabah-bn-mp-tells-putrajaya-to-cut-diplomatic-ti|archive-date=25 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-asks-philippines/2565596.html|title=Malaysia asks Philippines not to threaten ties over Sabah claim| first= Sumisha | last= Naidu|publisher=Channel NewsAsia|date=2 March 2016|access-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325095839/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-asks-philippines/2565596.html|archive-date=25 March 2016}}</ref> The [[Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia]] in 1978, backed by the Soviet Union, was not accepted by ASEAN. They rejected it as a violation of the principles of regional integration. ASEAN cooperated with US and Australia to oppose Vietnam's move and it sponsored a Cambodian resolution in the United Nations General Assembly. ASEAN played a major role starting in 1980 in the peace process, leading to the 1991 Paris Agreement.


=== Relations with other blocs ===
===Relations with other blocs===
[[File:ASEAN with Plus 3 and Plus 6.png|thumb|upright=1.8|right|
[[File:ASEAN with Plus 3 and Plus 6.png|thumb|upright=1.8|
{{legend|#1743a6|ASEAN}}<!-- Blue -->
{{legend|#1743a6|ASEAN}}<!-- Blue -->
{{legend|#6330d5|ASEAN Plus Three}}<!-- Purple -->
{{legend|#6330d5|ASEAN Plus Three}}<!-- Purple -->
Line 472: Line 568:
]]
]]


==== ASEAN Plus Three ====
====ASEAN Plus Three====
In 1990, Malaysia proposed the creation of an [[East Asia Economic Caucus]]<ref name="caucus">[http://www.asean.org/9303.htm East Asia Economic Caucus]. ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 14 March 2007. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302193928/http://www.asean.org/9303.htm}}</ref> composed of the members of ASEAN, China, Japan, and South Korea. It intended to counterbalance the growing US influence in [[Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation]] (APEC) and Asia as a whole.<ref name="oppose">[http://www.asiaviews.org/?content=ger53rger567664&voices=20060125184254 Asiaviews.org], Whither East Asia? Retrieved 14 March 2007. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141105102541/http://www.asiaviews.org/?content=ger53rger567664&voices=20060125184254}}</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20100605002320/http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs//data/1993/upl-meta-crs-66/93-633f_1993Jun30.txt?PHPSESSID=f7a7ec622077fa19bfce9ec9def6f3d9 UNT.edu], Asia's Reaction to NAFTA, Nancy J. Hamilton. CRS – Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 14 March 2007.</ref> However, the proposal failed because of strong opposition from the US and Japan.<ref name="oppose" /><ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/1994/07/26/caucus.php IHT.com], Japan Straddles Fence on Issue of East Asia Caucus. [[International Herald Tribune]]. Retrieved 14 March 2007. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212201202/http://www.iht.com/articles/1994/07/26/caucus.php}}</ref> Work for further integration continued, and the [[ASEAN Plus Three]],<ref name="aseanplusthree">[https://aseanplusthree.asean.org ASEAN Plus Three]</ref> consisting of ASEAN, China, Japan, and South Korea, was created in 1997.
In 1990, Malaysia proposed the creation of an [[East Asia Economic Caucus]]<ref name="caucus">[http://www.asean.org/9303.htm East Asia Economic Caucus]. ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 14 March 2007. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302193928/http://www.asean.org/9303.htm|date=2 March 2012}}</ref> composed of the members of ASEAN, China, Japan, and South Korea. It intended to counterbalance the growing US influence in [[Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation]] (APEC) and Asia as a whole.<ref name="oppose">{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20060429002757/http://asiaviews.org/?content=ger53rger567664&voices=20060125184254 Asiaviews.org]}}, Whither East Asia? Retrieved 14 March 2007.</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20100605002320/http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs//data/1993/upl-meta-crs-66/93-633f_1993Jun30.txt?PHPSESSID=f7a7ec622077fa19bfce9ec9def6f3d9 UNT.edu], Asia's Reaction to NAFTA, Nancy J. Hamilton. CRS – Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 14 March 2007.</ref> However, the proposal failed because of strong opposition from the US and Japan.<ref name="oppose" /><ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/1994/07/26/caucus.php IHT.com], Japan Straddles Fence on Issue of East Asia Caucus. [[International Herald Tribune]]. Retrieved 14 March 2007. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212201202/http://www.iht.com/articles/1994/07/26/caucus.php|date=12 February 2009}}</ref> Work for further integration continued, and the ASEAN Plus Three,<ref name="aseanplusthree">[https://aseanplusthree.asean.org/about-apt/ ASEAN Plus Three – History and Development]</ref> consisting of ASEAN, China, Japan, and South Korea, was created in 1997.


[[ASEAN Plus Three]]<ref name="aseanplusthree"/> is a forum that functions as a coordinator of co-operation between the ASEAN and the three [[East Asia]]n nations of China, South Korea, and Japan. Government leaders, ministers, and senior officials from the ten members of the ASEAN and the three East Asian states consult on an increasing range of issues.<ref>[http://www.irchina.org/en/pdf/zxm06.pdf "The Rise of China and Community Building in East Asia"]{{dead link|bot=R92008846 |fix-attempted=yes }}, Zhang Xiaoming, ASIAN Perspective, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 129-148.</ref> The ASEAN Plus Three is the latest development of Southeast Asia-East Asia regional co-operation. In the past, proposals, such as South Korea's call for an Asian Common Market in 1970 and Japan's 1988 suggestion for an Asian Network, have been made to bring closer regional co-operation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aseansec.org/16580.htm |title=Archived copy |access-date=2016-04-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130528001949/http://www.aseansec.org/16580.htm |archive-date=28 May 2013 }} ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation</ref>
ASEAN Plus Three<ref name="aseanplusthree" /> is a forum that functions as a coordinator of co-operation between the ASEAN and the three [[East Asia]]n nations of China, South Korea, and Japan. Government leaders, ministers, and senior officials from the eleven members of ASEAN and the three East Asian states consult on an increasing range of issues.<ref>[http://www.irchina.org/en/pdf/zxm06.pdf "The Rise of China and Community Building in East Asia"]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, Zhang Xiaoming, ASIAN Perspective, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 129–148.</ref> ASEAN Plus Three is the latest development of Southeast Asia-East Asia regional co-operation. In the past, proposals, such as South Korea's call for an Asian Common Market in 1970 and Japan's 1988 suggestion for an Asian Network, have been made to bring closer regional co-operation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aseansec.org/16580.htm |title=ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation|access-date=2016-04-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204162811/http://www.aseansec.org/16580.htm |archive-date=4 February 2012|url-status=usurped }}</ref>


The first leaders' meetings were held in 1996, and 1997 to deal with [[Asia–Europe Meeting]] issues, and China and Japan each wanted regular summit meetings with ASEAN members afterwards. The group's significance and importance were strengthened by the [[Asian Financial Crisis]]. In response to the crisis, ASEAN closely cooperated with China, South Korea, and Japan. Since the implementation of the Joint Statement on East Asia Cooperation in 1999 at the Manila Summit, ASEAN Plus Three finance ministers have been holding periodic consultations.<ref>Stubbs, R. "ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?" n.d. web. 12 May 2012.</ref> ASEAN Plus Three, in establishing the [[Chiang Mai Initiative]], has been credited as forming the basis for financial stability in Asia,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aseansec.org/17902.pdf|title=Welcome To The World Of Smokeless Cigarettes!|author=atinder|work=E-Cigarette Review Council|access-date=28 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716172317/http://www.aseansec.org/17902.pdf|archive-date=16 July 2011}}</ref> the lack of such stability having contributed to the Asian Financial Crisis.
The first leaders' meetings were held in 1996, and 1997 to deal with [[Asia–Europe Meeting]] issues, and China and Japan each wanted regular summit meetings with ASEAN members afterwards. The group's significance and importance were strengthened by the [[1997 Asian financial crisis]]. In response to the crisis, ASEAN closely cooperated with China, South Korea, and Japan. Since the implementation of the Joint Statement on East Asia Cooperation in 1999 at the Manila Summit, ASEAN Plus Three finance ministers have been holding periodic consultations.<ref>Stubbs, R. "ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?" n.d. web. 12 May 2012.</ref> ASEAN Plus Three, in establishing the [[Chiang Mai Initiative]], has been credited as forming the basis for financial stability in Asia,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aseansec.org/17902.pdf|title=Welcome To The World Of Smokeless Cigarettes!|author=atinder|work=E-Cigarette Review Council|access-date=28 April 2016|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716172317/http://www.aseansec.org/17902.pdf|archive-date=16 July 2011}}</ref> the lack of such stability having contributed to the [[1997 Asian financial crisis]].
[[File:12th ASEAN+3 Summit in Hua Hin, Thailand, on Oct. 24, 2009 (4348160442).jpg|thumb|12th ASEAN+3 Summit in [[Hua Hin district|Hua Hin]], Thailand, on Oct. 24, 2009]]
Since the process began in 1997, ASEAN Plus Three has also focused on subjects other than finance such as the areas of food and energy security, financial co-operation, trade facilitation, disaster management, people-to-people contacts, narrowing the development gap, rural development, poverty alleviation, human trafficking, labour movement, communicable diseases, environment and sustainable development, and [[transnational crime]], including counter-terrorism. With the aim of further strengthening the nations' co-operation, East Asia Vision Group (EAVG) II was established at the 13th ASEAN Plus Three Summit on 29 October 2010 in [[Hanoi]] to stock-take, review, and identify the future direction of the co-operation.


Since the process began in 1997, ASEAN Plus Three has also focused on subjects other than finance such as the areas of food and energy security, financial co-operation, trade facilitation, disaster management, people-to-people contacts, narrowing the development gap, rural development, and poverty alleviation, human trafficking, labour movement, communicable diseases, environment and sustainable development, and [[transnational crime]], including counter-terrorism. With the aim of further strengthening the nations' co-operation, East Asia Vision Group (EAVG) II was established at the 13th ASEAN Plus Three Summit on 29 October 2010 in [[Hanoi]] to stock-take, review, and identify the future direction of the co-operation.
The ASEAN Plus Three framework also serves as a platform for the ASEAN affiliated intergovernmental organisations in China, Korea, and Japan to meet and cooperate. The [[ASEAN-China Centre]], the [[ASEAN-Japan Centre]], and [[ASEAN-Korea Centre]] currently convene annually to discuss ongoing projects and to discuss possible areas of cooperation vis-a-vis ASEAN.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.asean-china-center.org/english/2022-10/11397.html |title= Secretaries-General of ASEAN-China Centre, ASEAN-Japan Centre and ASEAN-Korea Centre Held 18th Informal Meeting |access-date=2024-05-07 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230923073442/http://www.asean-china-center.org/english/2022-10/11397.html |archive-date=23 September 2023 }}</ref>
 
==== ASEAN Plus Six ====


====ASEAN Plus Six====
[[File:12th East Asia Summit (3).jpg|thumb|12th East Asia Summit in [[Pasay]], Philippines on November 14, 2017]]
ASEAN Plus Three was the first of attempts for further integration to improve existing ties of Southeast Asia with [[East Asia]]n countries of China, Japan and South Korea. This was followed by the even larger [[East Asia Summit]] (EAS), which included ASEAN Plus Three as well as India, Australia, and New Zealand. This group acted as a prerequisite for the planned [[East Asia Community]] which was supposedly patterned after the [[European Community]] (now transformed into the [[European Union]]). The [[ASEAN Eminent Persons Group]] was created to study this policy's possible successes and failures.
ASEAN Plus Three was the first of attempts for further integration to improve existing ties of Southeast Asia with [[East Asia]]n countries of China, Japan and South Korea. This was followed by the even larger [[East Asia Summit]] (EAS), which included ASEAN Plus Three as well as India, Australia, and New Zealand. This group acted as a prerequisite for the planned [[East Asia Community]] which was supposedly patterned after the [[European Community]] (now transformed into the [[European Union]]). The [[ASEAN Eminent Persons Group]] was created to study this policy's possible successes and failures.


The group became ASEAN Plus Six with Australia, New Zealand, and India, and stands as the linchpin of [[Asia-Pacific|Asia Pacific]]'s economic, political, security, socio-cultural architecture, as well as the global economy.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.jcer.or.jp/eng/pdf/asia07.pdf |title=An ASEAN+6 Economic Partnership: Significance and Tasks |last=Urata |first=Shujiro |access-date=29 November 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053153/https://www.jcer.or.jp/eng/pdf/asia07.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/con_sep07_e/kawai_wignaraja_e.pdf |title=ASEAN+3 or ASEAN+6: Which Way Forward? |last1=Kawai |first1=Masahiro |last2=Wignaraja |first2=Ganeshan |access-date=29 November 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053202/https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/con_sep07_e/kawai_wignaraja_e.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Conclusion for Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership 'finally in sight': PM Lee |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-pm-lee-10662722 |work=Channel NewsAsia |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=16 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916164051/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-pm-lee-10662722 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="East Asia Forum">{{cite news|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/15/asean6-as-a-step-towards-an-asian-economic-community/|title=ASEAN+6 as a step towards an Asian Economic Community|work=East Asia Forum|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053206/https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/15/asean6-as-a-step-towards-an-asian-economic-community/|url-status=live}}</ref> Codification of the relations between these countries has seen progress through the development of the [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership]], a free-trade agreement involving the 15 countries of ASEAN Plus Six (excluding India). RCEP would, in part, allow the members to protect local sectors and give more time to comply with the aim for developed country members.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/tpp-rcep-ftaap-a-users-guide-to-alphabet-soup-of-trade-deals |title=TPP, RCEP, FTAAP - a user's guide to alphabet soup of trade deals |newspaper=The Straits Times |access-date=28 November 2016 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053205/http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/tpp-rcep-ftaap-a-users-guide-to-alphabet-soup-of-trade-deals |url-status=live }}</ref>
The group became ASEAN Plus Six with Australia, New Zealand, and India, and stands as the linchpin of the [[Asia–Pacific]]'s economic, political, security, socio-cultural architecture, as well as the global economy.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.jcer.or.jp/eng/pdf/asia07.pdf |title=An ASEAN+6 Economic Partnership: Significance and Tasks |last=Urata |first=Shujiro |date=February 2008 |access-date=29 November 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053153/https://www.jcer.or.jp/eng/pdf/asia07.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/con_sep07_e/kawai_wignaraja_e.pdf |title=ASEAN+3 or ASEAN+6: Which Way Forward? |last1=Kawai |first1=Masahiro |last2=Wignaraja |first2=Ganeshan |access-date=29 November 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053202/https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/con_sep07_e/kawai_wignaraja_e.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Conclusion for RCEP">{{cite news |last=Tang |first=See Kit|title=Conclusion for Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership 'finally in sight': PM Lee |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-pm-lee-10662722 |work=[[Channel NewsAsia]] |date=29 August 2018 |access-date=16 September 2018 |archive-date=16 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916164051/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-pm-lee-10662722 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="East Asia Forum">{{cite news|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/15/asean6-as-a-step-towards-an-asian-economic-community/|title=ASEAN+6 as a step towards an Asian Economic Community|date=15 May 2009|work=East Asia Forum|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053206/https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/15/asean6-as-a-step-towards-an-asian-economic-community/|url-status=live}}</ref> Codification of the relations between these countries has seen progress through the development of the [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership]], a free-trade agreement involving the 15 countries of ASEAN Plus Six (excluding India). RCEP would, in part, allow the members to protect local sectors and give more time to comply with the aim for developed country members.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/tpp-rcep-ftaap-a-users-guide-to-alphabet-soup-of-trade-deals |title=TPP, RCEP, FTAAP a user's guide to alphabet soup of trade deals |newspaper=The Straits Times |date=20 November 2016 |access-date=28 November 2016 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053205/http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/tpp-rcep-ftaap-a-users-guide-to-alphabet-soup-of-trade-deals |url-status=live }}</ref>


The economies in this region that have not joined the RCEP are: Hong Kong, India, Macau, North Korea and Taiwan.
[[India]] temporarily does not join the RCEP for the protection of its own market, but Japan, China, and ASEAN welcomes India's participation.<ref name="Chinese government official website. 1–25">{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-11/08/content_5450257.htm |script-title=zh:中方:无意追求对印度贸易顺差 欢迎印度尽早加入Rcep_滚动新闻_中国政府网 |script-website=zh:中国政府网_中央人民政府门户网站}}</ref>


[[Hong Kong]] is actively seeking to join. Hong Kong itself has signed free trade agreements with ASEAN, New Zealand, Mainland China, and Australia. Mainland China welcomes Hong Kong's participation. According to the 2018 policy address of the Special Chief Executive, the Special Chief Executive She will start negotiations with RCEP member states after the signing of RCEP.{{Citation needed}}
[[Taiwan]] has been excluded from participating with the organisation owing to China's influence on the [[Asia–Pacific]] through its economic and diplomatic influence.<ref name="Hsieh pp. 1–25">{{cite journal | last=Hsieh | first=Pasha L. | title=Rethinking non-recognition: Taiwan's new pivot to ASEAN and the one-China policy | journal=Cambridge Review of International Affairs | publisher=Informa UK Limited | date=2019-09-09 | volume=33 | issue=2 | issn=0955-7571 | doi=10.1080/09557571.2019.1657796 | pages=204–228 | s2cid=203301979 | url=https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2953 | access-date=3 September 2020 | archive-date=30 September 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053205/https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2953/ | url-status=live }}</ref>
As Asia's [[financial center]] and Asia's trading hub, Hong Kong can provide member countries with high-quality financial services.


[[India]] temporarily does not join the RCEP for the protection of its own market, but Japan, China, and ASEAN welcomes India's participation.<ref name="Chinese government official website. 1–25">{{cite web |url=http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-11/08/content_5450257.htm |script-title=zh:中方:无意追求对印度贸易顺差 欢迎印度尽早加入Rcep_滚动新闻_中国政府网 |script-website=zh:中国政府网_中央人民政府门户网站}}</ref> The members stated that "the door will always be open" and promised to create convenient conditions for India to participate in RCEP. And India itself has signed free trade agreements with ASEAN, Japan and South Korea.
==Environment==
[[File:Borneo fires October 2006.jpg|thumb|left|Haze over [[Borneo]], 2006]]
[[File:Asean-co2-emissions-per-capita.png|thumb|[[Greenhouse gas emissions]] per capita of different ASEAN countries.]]
At the turn of the 21st century, ASEAN began to discuss environmental agreements. These included the signing of the [[ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution]] in 2002 as an attempt to control haze pollution in Southeast Asia, arguably the region's most high-profile environmental issue.<ref>ASEAN Secretariat. [http://www.asean.org/8914.htm ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution]. Extracted 12 October 2006 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302193935/http://www.asean.org/8914.htm |date=2 March 2012 }}</ref> Unfortunately, this was unsuccessful due to the outbreaks of haze in [[2005 Malaysian haze|2005]], [[2006 Southeast Asian haze|2006]], [[2009 Southeast Asian haze|2009]], [[2013 Southeast Asian haze|2013]], and [[2015 Southeast Asian haze|2015]]. Thirteen years after signing the [[ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution]], the situation with respect to the long term issue of [[Southeast Asian haze]] had not changed for 50% of the ASEAN member states, and still remained as a crisis every two years during summer and fall.<ref>{{cite web|title=Travel Advise for Swiss Abroad in Singapore (German)|url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/countries/singapore/de/home/reisehinweise/vor-ort.html|access-date=19 September 2015|archive-date=25 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151025050641/https://www.eda.admin.ch/countries/singapore/de/home/reisehinweise/vor-ort.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Travel advise for Swiss abroad in Malaysia|url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/malaysia/reisehinweise-fuermalaysia.html|access-date=19 September 2015|archive-date=16 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016162730/https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/malaysia/reisehinweise-fuermalaysia.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Travel advise for Swiss abroad in Indonesia|url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/indonesien/reisehinweise-fuerindonesien.html|access-date=19 September 2015|archive-date=16 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016162730/https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/indonesien/reisehinweise-fuerindonesien.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


As a free trade port, [[Macau]]'s tax rate itself is very low. Macau's economy does not depend on import and export trade. Tourism and gaming are the main economic industries in Macau. The Macau government did not state whether to join RCEP. Macau still{{when}} has room for openness in the service industry.{{citation needed}}
Trash dumping from foreign countries (such as Japan and Canada) to ASEAN has yet to be discussed and resolved.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/years-after-2500-tonnes-of-canadian-trash-landed-in-manila-philippines-demanding-we-take-it-back | title=Years after 2,500 tonnes of Canadian trash landed in Manila, Philippines demanding we take it back | newspaper=National Post | access-date=4 March 2016 }}</ref> Important issues include [[deforestation]] (with Indonesia recorded the largest loss of forest in the region, more than other member states combined in the 2001–2013 period<ref>{{cite web|title=Country Rankings|url=http://www.globalforestwatch.org/countries/overview|website=Global Forest Loss|access-date=2 March 2015|archive-date=7 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150407032917/http://www.globalforestwatch.org/countries/overview}}</ref>), plastic waste dumping (5 member states were among the top 10 out of 192 countries based on 2010 data, with Indonesia ranked as second worst polluter<ref>{{cite journal |last=Jambeck |first=Jenna |author-link=Jenna Jambeck |s2cid=206562155 |title=Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean |journal=Science |date=13 February 2015 |volume=347 |issue=6223 |pages=768–771 |doi=10.1126/science.1260352 |pmid=25678662 |bibcode=2015Sci...347..768J}}</ref>), threatened mammal species (Indonesia ranked the worst in the region with 184 species under threat<ref>{{cite web|title=Mammal species, threatened|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.MAM.THRD.NO/countries|website=World Bank|publisher=UN Environmental Forum; [[World Conservation Monitoring Centre]]; [[International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN)|access-date=24 June 2015|date=2014|archive-date=26 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150626100548/http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.MAM.THRD.NO/countries|url-status=live}}</ref>), threatened fish species (Indonesia ranked the worst in the region<ref>{{cite web|title=Fish species, threatened|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.FSH.THRD.NO/countries|website=The World Bank|access-date=24 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053308/https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.FSH.THRD.NO|url-status=live}}</ref>), threatened (higher) plant species (Malaysia ranked the worst in the region<ref>{{cite web|title=Plant species (higher), threatened|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.HPT.THRD.NO/countries|website=The World Bank|access-date=24 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053308/https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.HPT.THRD.NO|url-status=live}}</ref>).
[[File:SolarGIS-Solar-map-South-And-South-East-Asia-en.png|thumb|[[Solar irradiance]] map of South and Southeast Asia, showing the high potential of [[solar power]] in ASEAN.]]
ASEAN's aggregate economy is one of the fastest growing in the world. It is expected to grow by 4.6% in 2019, and 4.8% in 2020, but at the cost of the release about 1.5 billion tonnes of [[Carbon dioxide|CO<sub>2</sub>]] to the atmosphere every year. That makes ASEAN a greater source of [[greenhouse gas emissions]] than Japan (1.3 billion tonnes per year) or Germany (796 million tonnes per year). It is the only region in the world where coal is expected to increase its share of the [[energy mix]].<ref name="Overland 100019" /><ref name=":2">{{cite journal |last1=Fazeli |first1=Reza |last2=Do |first2=Thang Nam |last3=Overland |first3=Indra |last4=Pradnyaswari |first4=Indira |title=Southeast Asia faces high stranded asset risk from coal power investments |journal=Energy Strategy Reviews |date=November 2025 |volume=62 |article-number=101971 |doi=10.1016/j.esr.2025.101971 }}</ref> According to the [[International Energy Agency]] (IEA), "Since 2000 [ASEAN's] overall energy demand has grown by more than 80% and the lion's share of this growth has been met by a doubling in [[fossil fuel]] use,... Oil is the largest element in the regional energy mix and coal, largely for power generation, has been the fastest growing."<ref name="E&E-20191120" /><ref name=":2" /> ASEAN has been criticised for not doing enough to [[Climate change mitigation|mitigate climate change]] although it is the world's most vulnerable region in terms of [[Climate change in Southeast Asia|climate impact]].<ref name="Overland 100019" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Overland |first=Indra |last2=Seah |first2=Sharon |date=2024 |title=Can Asia's climate leader please step forward? |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/aspp.12754 |journal=Asian Politics & Policy |language=en |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=429–449 |doi=10.1111/aspp.12754 |issn=1943-0787}}</ref>


[[Taiwan]] has been excluded from participating with the organization owing to China's influence on the [[Asia Pacific]] through its economic and diplomatic influence.<ref name="Hsieh pp. 1–25">{{cite journal | last=Hsieh | first=Pasha L. | title=Rethinking non-recognition: Taiwan's new pivot to ASEAN and the one-China policy | journal=Cambridge Review of International Affairs | publisher=Informa UK Limited | date=2019-09-09 | volume=33 | issue=2 | issn=0955-7571 | doi=10.1080/09557571.2019.1657796 | pages=204–228 | s2cid=203301979 | url=https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2953 | access-date=3 September 2020 | archive-date=30 September 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053205/https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2953/ | url-status=live }}</ref> Because Taiwan itself has a [[New Southbound Policy]], the inability to join the RCEP is expected to have little impact on Taiwan.{{according to whom}} At the same time, Taiwan is also considering whether to cancel [[Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement|ECFA]] to counter China.{{citation needed}}
ASEAN has many opportunities for [[renewable energy]].<ref name="spatial">{{cite web |title=An Overview of Spatial Policy in Vietnam |url=https://www.mlit.go.jp/kokudokeikaku/international/spw/general/vietnam/index_e.html |access-date=2023-10-19 |website=mlit.go.jp}}</ref><ref name="DoBurkeNguyenOverlandSuryadiSwandaruYurnaidi2021">{{cite journal|last1=Do|first1=Thang Nam|last2=Burke|first2=Paul J.|last3=Nguyen|first3=Hoang Nam|last4=Overland|first4=Indra|last5=Suryadi|first5=Beni|last6=Swandaru|first6=Akbar|last7=Yurnaidi|first7=Zulfikar|date=2021-12-01|title=Vietnam's solar and wind power success: Policy implications for the other ASEAN countries|journal=Energy for Sustainable Development|volume=65|pages=1–11|doi=10.1016/j.esd.2021.09.002|issn=0973-0826|doi-access=free|bibcode=2021ESusD..65....1D |hdl=1885/248804|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> With [[Solar power|solar]] and [[wind power]] plus off river pumped hydro storage, ASEAN electricity industry could achieve very high penetration (78%–97%) of domestic solar and wind energy resources at a competitive levelised costs of electricity range from 55 to 115 U.S. dollars per megawatt-hour based on 2020 technology costs.<ref name="spatial" /> Vietnam's experience in solar and wind power development provides relevant implications for the other ASEAN countries.<ref name="DoBurkeNguyenOverlandSuryadiSwandaruYurnaidi2021" /> The proposed [[ASEAN Power Grid]] could allow for renewable energy transmission from large producers like [[Vietnam]] to others within ASEAN.


==Environment==
=== Energy transition ===
[[File:Borneo fires October 2006.jpg|thumb|left|Haze over [[Borneo]], 2006]]
{{See also|ASEAN Power Grid}}{{Pie chart
At the turn of the 21st century, ASEAN began to discuss environmental agreements. These included the signing of the [[ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution]] in 2002 as an attempt to control haze pollution in Southeast Asia, arguably the region's most high-profile environmental issue.<ref>ASEAN Secretariat. [http://www.asean.org/8914.htm ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution]. Extracted 12 October 2006 {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302193935/http://www.asean.org/8914.htm }}</ref> Unfortunately, this was unsuccessful due to the outbreaks of haze in [[2005 Malaysian haze|2005]], [[2006 Southeast Asian haze|2006]], [[2009 Southeast Asian haze|2009]], [[2013 Southeast Asian haze|2013]], and [[2015 Southeast Asian haze|2015]].
| caption = Total primary energy supply by fuel (ASEAN, 2020)<ref name="ACI2024">{{cite book
As of 2015, thirteen years after signing the [[ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution]], the situation with respect to the long term issue of [[Southeast Asian haze]] has not been changed for 50% of the ASEAN member states, and still remains as a crisis every two years during summer and fall.<ref>{{cite web|title=Travel Advise for Swiss Abroad in Singapore (German)|url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/countries/singapore/de/home/reisehinweise/vor-ort.html|access-date=19 September 2015|archive-date=25 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151025050641/https://www.eda.admin.ch/countries/singapore/de/home/reisehinweise/vor-ort.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Travel advise for Swiss abroad in Malaysia|url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/malaysia/reisehinweise-fuermalaysia.html|access-date=19 September 2015|archive-date=16 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016162730/https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/malaysia/reisehinweise-fuermalaysia.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Travel advise for Swiss abroad in Indonesia|url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/indonesien/reisehinweise-fuerindonesien.html|access-date=19 September 2015|archive-date=16 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016162730/https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/vertretungen-und-reisehinweise/indonesien/reisehinweise-fuerindonesien.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
|title=ASEAN's Digital and Energy Transition: A Competitiveness Analysis
[[File:ASEAN explained in 5 minutes.webm|thumb|Video: ASEAN explained in 5 minutes]]
|publisher=Asia Competitiveness Institute, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore
Trash dumping from foreign countries (such as Japan and Canada) to ASEAN has yet to be discussed and resolved.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/years-after-2500-tonnes-of-canadian-trash-landed-in-manila-philippines-demanding-we-take-it-back | title=Years after 2,500 tonnes of Canadian trash landed in Manila, Philippines demanding we take it back | newspaper=National Post | access-date=4 March 2016 }}</ref> Important issues include deforestation (with Indonesia recorded the largest loss of forest in the region, more than other member states combined in the 2001-2013 period<ref>{{cite web|title=Country Rankings|url=http://www.globalforestwatch.org/countries/overview|website=Global Forest Loss|access-date=2 March 2015|archive-date=7 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150407032917/http://www.globalforestwatch.org/countries/overview}}</ref>), plastic waste dumping (5 member states were among the top 10 out of 192 countries based on 2010 data, with Indonesia ranked as second worst polluter<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jambeck|first1=Jenna R.|s2cid=206562155|title=Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean|journal=Science| volume=347|issue=6223|pages=768–771|doi=10.1126/science.1260352 |pmid=25678662|bibcode=2015Sci...347..768J}}</ref>), threatened mammal species (Indonesia ranked the worst in the region with 184 species under threat<ref>{{cite web|title=Mammal species, threatened|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.MAM.THRD.NO/countries|website=World Bank|publisher=UN Environmental Forum; [[World Conservation Monitoring Centre]]; [[International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN)|access-date=24 June 2015|archive-date=26 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150626100548/http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.MAM.THRD.NO/countries|url-status=live}}</ref>), threatened fish species (Indonesia ranked the worst in the region<ref>{{cite web|title=Fish species, threatened|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.FSH.THRD.NO/countries|website=The World Bank|access-date=24 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053308/https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.FSH.THRD.NO|url-status=live}}</ref>), threatened (higher) plant species (Malaysia ranked the worst in the region<ref>{{cite web|title=Plant species (higher), threatened|url=http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.HPT.THRD.NO/countries|website=The World Bank|access-date=24 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053308/https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.HPT.THRD.NO|url-status=live}}</ref>).
|location=Singapore
 
|date=2024
ASEAN's aggregate economy is one of the fastest growing in the world. It is expected to grow by 4.6% in 2019, and 4.8% in 2020, but at the cost of the release about 1.5 billion [[tonne]]s of CO<sub>2</sub> to the atmosphere every year. That makes ASEAN a greater source of greenhouse gas emissions than Japan (1.3 billion tonnes per year) or Germany (796 million tonnes per year). It is the only region in the world where coal is expected to increase its share of the [[energy mix]].<ref name="Overland 100019"/> According to the [[International Energy Agency]] (IEA), "Since 2000 [ASEAN's] overall energy demand has grown by more than 80% and the lion's share of this growth has been met by a doubling in fossil fuel use,... Oil is the largest element in the regional energy mix and coal, largely for power generation, has been the fastest growing."<ref name="E&E-20191120" /> ASEAN has been criticized for not doing enough to mitigate climate change although it is the world's most vulnerable region in terms of climate impact.<ref name="Overland 100019"/>
|url=https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/aci/asean-s-digital-and-energy-transition_a-competitiveness-analysis.pdf
|access-date=5 December 2025
|pages=28–30}}</ref>
| value1 = 32
| label1 = Oil
| color1 = black
| value2 = 26
| label2 = Coal
| color2 = #8B3333
| value3 = 20
| label3 = Natural gas
| color3 = #8B8888
| value4 = 5
| label4 = Traditional use of [[Biomass (energy)|Biomass]]
| color4 = white
| value5 = 18
| label5 = Renewables
| color5 = #668B22
}}
The ASEAN has initiated its transition to cleaner energy sources. This transition is characterised as Demanding, Doable, and Dependent.<ref name="Do">{{Cite journal |last=Do |first=Thang Nam |date=May 2024 |title=Insider perspectives on Southeast Asiaʼs clean energy transition |journal=Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies|volume=11 |issue=2 |article-number=e390 |doi=10.1002/app5.390 |issn=2050-2680|doi-access=free }}</ref> With approximately 700 million inhabitants, the region is witnessing a substantial surge in energy demand, projected to triple by 2050. However, transitioning energy sources requires significant resources.{{Citation needed|date=December 2025}} Southeast Asia would need to invest US$27 billion annually in renewable energy to achieve the target of 23% renewables in the primary energy supply by 2025. Nevertheless, this goal is attainable with the implementation of appropriate policies.<ref name="Do" />


ASEAN has many opportunities for renewable energy.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last1=Lu|first1=Bin|last2=Blakers|first2=Andrew|last3=Stocks|first3=Matthew|last4=Do|first4=Thang Nam|title=Low-cost, low-emission 100% renewable electricity in Southeast Asia supported by pumped hydro storage|journal=Energy|language=en|volume=236|pages=121387|doi=10.1016/j.energy.2021.121387|issn=0360-5442|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last1=Do|first1=Thang Nam|last2=Burke|first2=Paul J.|last3=Nguyen|first3=Hoang Nam|last4=Overland|first4=Indra|last5=Suryadi|first5=Beni|last6=Swandaru|first6=Akbar|last7=Yurnaidi|first7=Zulfikar|title=Vietnam's solar and wind power success: Policy implications for the other ASEAN countries|journal=Energy for Sustainable Development|language=en|volume=65|pages=1–11|doi=10.1016/j.esd.2021.09.002|issn=0973-0826|doi-access=free}}</ref> With solar and wind power plus off river pumped hydro storage, ASEAN electricity industry could achieve very high penetration (78%–97%) of domestic solar and wind energy resources at a competitive levelised costs of electricity range from 55 to 115 U.S. dollars per megawatt-hour based on 2020 technology costs.<ref name=":2" /> Vietnam's experience in solar and wind power development provides relevant implications for the other ASEAN countries.<ref name=":3" />
Vietnam serves as a compelling example of rapid adoption of solar and wind energy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Do |first1=Thang Nam |last2=Burke |first2=Paul J. |last3=Nguyen |first3=Hoang Nam |last4=Overland |first4=Indra |last5=Suryadi |first5=Beni |last6=Swandaru |first6=Akbar |last7=Yurnaidi |first7=Zulfikar |title=Vietnam's solar and wind power success: Policy implications for the other ASEAN countries |journal=Energy for Sustainable Development |date=December 2021 |volume=65 |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1016/j.esd.2021.09.002 |bibcode=2021ESusD..65....1D |hdl=1885/248804 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Since 2019, Vietnam has emerged as a regional leader, with solar and wind energy accounting for 13% of its electricity mix in 2022, a remarkable increase from nearly zero in 2017. Though, the region requires international assistance to meet its net-zero emission targets.<ref name="Do" /> Phasing out coal remains a daunting task, although countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam have pledged to phasing out coal power by 2040s.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Do |first1=Thang Nam |last2=Burke |first2=Paul J. |date=2024-06-01 |title=Phasing out coal power in two major Southeast Asian thermal coal economies: Indonesia and Vietnam |journal=Energy for Sustainable Development |volume=80 |article-number=101451 |doi=10.1016/j.esd.2024.101451 |issn=0973-0826|doi-access=free |bibcode=2024ESusD..8001451D |hdl=1885/317223 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Several high-profile leaders such as the head of the Indonesian national energy company [[Perusahaan Listrik Negara|PLN]], [[Darmawan Prasodjo]], have stated that the [[ASEAN Power Grid]] proposal is key to unlocking the potential for green energy in southeast Asia.<ref>{{Cite press release |title=ASEAN AIPF Opened by President, PLN Presents Green Enabling Supergrid |url=https://www.jcnnewswire.com/pressrelease/86382/2/ASEAN-AIPF-Opened-by-President,-PLN-Presents-Green-Enabling-Supergrid |access-date=2024-05-25 |website=jcnnewswire.com}}</ref>


==Education==
==Education==
To enhance the region's status in education, ASEAN education ministers have agreed four priorities for education at all levels, promoting ASEAN awareness among ASEAN citizens, particularly youth, strengthening ASEAN identity through education, building ASEAN human resources in the field of education strengthening the [[ASEAN University Network]].<ref name="Education 2009">"ASEANWEB - Education." ASEANWEB - Education. N.p., 2009. Web. 23 October 2012.</ref> At the 11th ASEAN Summit in December 2005, leaders set new direction for regional education collaboration when they welcomed the decision of the ASEAN education ministers to convene meetings on a regular basis. The annual ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting oversees co-operation efforts on education at the ministerial level. With regard to implementation, programs, and activities are carried out by the ASEAN Senior Officials on Education (SOM-ED). SOM-ED also manages co-operation on [[higher education]] through the [[ASEAN University Network]] (AUN).<ref>ASEAN. "ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting". Association of Southeast Asian Nations. ASEAN Secretariat. 2012. {{cite web |url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-education-ministers-meeting-ased |title=ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting (ASED) |access-date=2015-02-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150211074208/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-education-ministers-meeting-ased |archive-date=11 February 2015 }}</ref> It is a consortium of [[Southeast Asia]]n tertiary institutions of which 30 currently belong as participating universities.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aun-sec.org/member_u.html |title=ASEAN University Network/Board Member |publisher=Aun-sec.org |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080731123240/http://www.aun-sec.org/member_u.html |archive-date = 31 July 2008}}</ref> Founded in November 1995 by 11 universities,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aun-sec.org/about_agreement.html |title=ASEAN University Network/Agreement |publisher=Aun-sec.org |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090201084304/http://www.aun-sec.org/about_agreement.html |archive-date=1 February 2009 }}</ref> the AUN was established to:<ref name="Education 2009" /> promote co-operation among ASEAN scholars, academics, and scientists, develop academic and professional human resources, promote information dissemination among the ASEAN academic community, enhance awareness of a regional identity and the sense of "ASEAN-ness" among member states.
[[File:ASEAN Delegation at EAYDP 2023 Malaysia.jpg|thumb|ASEAN Delegation at the EU-ASEAN Youth Diplomat Program 2023 in Faculty of International Relations of [[University Malaya]]|left]]
To enhance the region's status in education, ASEAN education ministers have agreed four priorities for education at all levels, promoting ASEAN awareness among ASEAN citizens, particularly youth, strengthening ASEAN identity through education, building ASEAN human resources in the field of education strengthening the [[ASEAN University Network]].<ref name="Education 2009">"ASEANWEB Education." ASEANWEB Education. N.p., 2009. Web. 23 October 2012.</ref> At the 11th ASEAN Summit in December 2005, leaders set new direction for regional education collaboration when they welcomed the decision of the ASEAN education ministers to convene meetings on a regular basis. The annual ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting oversees co-operation efforts on education at the ministerial level. With regard to implementation, programs, and activities are carried out by the ASEAN Senior Officials on Education (SOM-ED). SOM-ED also manages co-operation on [[higher education]] through the [[ASEAN University Network]] (AUN).<ref>ASEAN. "ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting". Association of Southeast Asian Nations. ASEAN Secretariat. 2012. {{cite web |url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-education-ministers-meeting-ased |title=ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting (ASED) |access-date=2015-02-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150211074208/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-education-ministers-meeting-ased |archive-date=11 February 2015 }}</ref> It is a consortium of [[Southeast Asia]]n tertiary institutions of which 30 currently belong as participating universities.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aun-sec.org/member_u.html |title=ASEAN University Network/Board Member |publisher=Aun-sec.org |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080731123240/http://www.aun-sec.org/member_u.html |archive-date = 31 July 2008}}</ref> Founded in November 1995 by 11 universities,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aun-sec.org/about_agreement.html |title=ASEAN University Network/Agreement |publisher=Aun-sec.org |access-date=21 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090201084304/http://www.aun-sec.org/about_agreement.html |archive-date=1 February 2009 }}</ref> the AUN was established to:<ref name="Education 2009" /> promote co-operation among ASEAN scholars, academics, and scientists, develop academic and professional human resources, promote information dissemination among the ASEAN academic community, enhance awareness of a regional identity and the sense of "ASEAN-ness" among member states.


The Southeast Asia Engineering Education Development Network (SEED-Net) Project was established as an autonomous sub-network of AUN in April 2001. It is aimed at promoting human resource development in engineering. The network consists of 26 member institutions selected by higher education ministries of each ASEAN member state, and 11 supporting Japanese universities selected by the Japanese government. This network is mainly supported by the Japanese government through the [[Japan International Cooperation Agency]] (JICA) and partially supported by the ASEAN Foundation. SEED-Net activities are implemented by the SEED-Net secretariat with the support of the JICA Project for SEED-Net now based at [[Chulalongkorn University]].
In November 2011, ten vocational schools and centres were established in China to help develop human resources to assist in the economic and social development of the ASEAN countries.<ref name="Loh">{{Cite book |last=Loh |first=Dylan M.H. |title=China's Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy |publisher=[[Stanford University Press]] |year=2024 |isbn=978-1-5036-3820-4}}</ref>{{Rp|page=160}}


ASEAN also has a [[scholarship]] program offered by Singapore to the 9 other member states for secondary school, junior college, and university education. It covers accommodation, food, medical benefits and accident insurance, school fees, and examination fees. Its recipients, who perform well on the [[GCE Advanced Level]] Examination, may apply for ASEAN undergraduate scholarships, which are tailored specifically to undergraduate institutions in Singapore and other ASEAN member countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.moe.gov.sg/admissions/scholarships/asean|title=About the ASEAN Scholarships|website=Ministry of Education Singapore|access-date=1 May 2017|archive-date=3 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703220100/https://www.moe.gov.sg/admissions/scholarships/asean|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ascklee.org/CV/iKMS-Article-2010.pdf |author=Keong, Lee Chu |title=Knowledge Management: Some Definitions. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130705153359/http://ascklee.org/CV/iKMS-Article-2010.pdf |archive-date=5 July 2013 |access-date=29 November 2018}}</ref>
ASEAN also has a [[scholarship]] program offered by Singapore to the 9 other member states for secondary school, junior college, and university education. It covers accommodation, food, medical benefits and accident insurance, school fees, and examination fees. Its recipients, who perform well on the [[GCE Advanced Level]] Examination, may apply for ASEAN undergraduate scholarships, which are tailored specifically to undergraduate institutions in Singapore and other ASEAN member countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.moe.gov.sg/admissions/scholarships/asean|title=About the ASEAN Scholarships|website=Ministry of Education Singapore|access-date=1 May 2017|archive-date=3 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703220100/https://www.moe.gov.sg/admissions/scholarships/asean|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ascklee.org/CV/iKMS-Article-2010.pdf |author=Keong, Lee Chu |title=Knowledge Management: Some Definitions. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130705153359/http://ascklee.org/CV/iKMS-Article-2010.pdf |archive-date=5 July 2013 |access-date=29 November 2018}}</ref>


'Australia for ASEAN' scholarships are also offered by the [[Australian Government]] to the 'next generation of leaders' from ASEAN member states. By undertaking a [[Master's degree]], recipients are to develop the skills and knowledge to drive change, help build links with Australia, and also participate in the Indo-Pacific Emerging Leaders Program to help develop the ASEAN Outlook for the Indo-Pacific. Each ASEAN member state is able to receive ten 'Australia for ASEAN' scholarships.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dfat.gov.au/people-to-people/australia-awards/participating-countries/australia-asean-scholarships |title=Australia for ASEAN scholarships |publisher=Australian Government – Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade |access-date=12 September 2022}}</ref>
'Australia for ASEAN' scholarships are also offered by the [[Australian Government]] to the 'next generation of leaders' from ASEAN member states. By undertaking a [[Master's degree]], recipients are to develop the skills and knowledge to drive change, help build links with Australia, and also participate in the Indo-Pacific Emerging Leaders Program to help develop the ASEAN Outlook for the Indo-Pacific. Each ASEAN member state is able to receive ten 'Australia for ASEAN' scholarships.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dfat.gov.au/people-to-people/australia-awards/participating-countries/australia-asean-scholarships |title=Australia for ASEAN scholarships |publisher=Australian Government – Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade |access-date=12 September 2022}}</ref>
==Demographics==
[[File:Jakartaskyline1.jpg|thumb|The [[Jakarta metropolitan area]], the largest city in the world, is nicknamed "the capital of ASEAN."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Rowlands |first=Lyndal |title=Indonesia's Jakarta now the world's largest city, Tokyo falls to third: UN |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/26/indonesias-jakarta-now-the-worlds-largest-city-tokyo-falls-to-third-un |access-date=2025-12-05 |website=Al Jazeera |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Seasia.co |title=From Summit to Secretariat: Why is Jakarta the Capital of ASEAN? |url=https://seasia.co/2025/07/22/why-is-jakarta-the-capital-of-asean |access-date=2025-12-05 |website=Seasia.co |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kompas |first=Tim Harian |date=2019-04-10 |title=DKI Jakarta juga Ibu Kota ASEAN |url=https://www.kompas.id/baca/utama/2019/04/10/dki-jakarta-juga-ibu-kota-asean |access-date=2025-12-05 |website=Kompas.id |language=id}}</ref>]]
In July 2019, the population of the ASEAN was about 655 million people (8.5% of the world population).<ref name="population">{{cite web |title=ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2020 |url=https://www.aseanstats.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ASYB_2020.pdf |access-date=20 January 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=30 December 2020 |title=ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2020 |url=https://www.aseanstats.org/publication/asyb_2020/ |access-date=20 January 2021}}</ref>{{update inline|date=September 2024}} In ASEAN in 2019, 55.2 million people were children age 0–4 and 46.3 million people were older than 65. This corresponds to 8.4% and 7.1% of the total ASEAN population. The region's population growth is 1.1% per year. [[Thailand]] is the lowest at 0.2% per year, and [[Cambodia]] is the highest at 1.9% per year. ASEAN's sex ratio is 99.4 males per 100 females, as of 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017 |title=ASEAN: KEY SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS |url=https://www.aseanstats.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ASEAN-Statistical-Leaflet-2017_Final.pdf |website=ASEAN Stats}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=The current source is insufficiently reliable ([[WP:NOTRS]]).|date=October 2025}}
=== Urbanisation ===
{{see also|List of cities in ASEAN by population}}
Just over half (around 50.1%) of Southeast Asia's inhabitants lived in urban areas in 2020, projected to rise to 55.6% in 2030, a total of almost 405 million people.<ref name=":0">{{cite report |url=https://connectivity.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/ASEAN-Sustainable-Urbanisation-Report_Final_December-2022.pdf |title=ASEAN Sustainable Urbanisation Report |date=December 2022 |publisher=ASEAN Secretariat |language=en |access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> Urbanisation is concentrated in coastal plains and river deltas, giving the region a dense belt of large cities around the [[Java Sea]], South China Sea and [[Gulf of Thailand]].<ref>{{Cite journal |date=2002 |editor-last=Tyson |editor-first=Peter |editor2-last=Fu |editor2-first=Congbin |editor3-last=Fuchs |editor3-first=Roland |editor4-last=Lebel |editor4-first=Louis |editor5-last=Mitra |editor5-first=A. P. |editor6-last=Odada |editor6-first=Eric |editor7-last=Perry |editor7-first=John |editor8-last=Steffen |editor8-first=Will |editor9-last=Virji |editor9-first=Hassan |title=Global-Regional Linkages in the Earth System |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-56228-0 |journal=SpringerLink |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-642-56228-0 |isbn=978-3-642-62693-7 }}</ref> Southeast Asia contains dozens of metropolitan areas with populations of over 1 million; ASEAN data indicate that about 13% of the region's citizens live in 28 cities with more than one million inhabitants, with a further 14% in 367 settlements of between 100,000 and 1 million people.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Review |first=Asia Insurance |title=Cover Story - AEC: Set in Motion - AEC: Southeast Asia welcomes a new economic dawn |url=https://www.asiainsurancereview.com/Magazine/ReadMagazineArticle?aid=37173 |access-date=2025-12-05 |website=Asia Insurance Review |language=en-US}}</ref>
With a population of roughly 42 million in 2025,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Yinuo |date=2025-11-18 |title=Press Release {{!}} Cities are home to 45 per cent of the global population, with megacities continuing to grow, UN report finds |url=https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2025/11/press-release-wup2025/ |access-date=2025-12-28 |website=United Nations Sustainable Development |language=en-US}}</ref> Greater Jakarta ([[Jakarta metropolitan area|Jabodetabek]]) is the largest metropolitan area in Southeast Asia and one of the largest urban agglomerations in the world, followed by the Greater Manila Area with about 28 million inhabitants. Jakarta and Manila, together with Bangkok, form the three largest metropolitan areas in Southeast Asia and are widely classed as [[Megacity|megacities]] with metropolitan populations exceeding ten million.{{cn|date=February 2026}} They are followed by major metropolitan regions centred on [[Ho Chi Minh City]], [[Singapore]], [[Kuala Lumpur]], [[Hanoi]], [[Surabaya]] and other large cities across Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia. The region also contains several polycentric or corridor-type urbanised regions, including the Jakarta–Bandung mega-urban corridor (JBMUR) on Java,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jatayu |first1=Anoraga |last2=Rustiadi |first2=Ernan |last3=Juanda |first3=Bambang |last4=Pribadi |first4=Didit Okta |date=2023-04-11 |title=Metric-Based Approach for Quantifying Urban Expansion Impact on Urban Form Changes in the JBMUR South Conurbation Corridor |journal=Land |volume=12 |issue=4 |page=864 |doi=10.3390/land12040864 |bibcode=2023Land...12..864J |doi-access=free }}</ref> the [[Indonesia–Malaysia–Singapore growth triangle|Singapore–Johor Bahru–Batam growth triangle]] (SIJORI), the extended [[Eastern Economic Corridor|Bangkok–Eastern Economic Corridor]] (EEC) along the Gulf of Thailand, and cross-border clusters in the [[Greater Mekong Subregion]] and the [[Brunei Darussalam–Indonesia–Malaysia–Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area|Brunei–Indonesia–Malaysia–Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area]] (BIMP–EAGA).<ref name=":0" /> {{Largest population centres|country=Southeast Asia|stat_ref=metropolitan regions, national censuses 2014–2020|list_by_pop=Larger urban zone#List of larger urban zones|div_link=Southeast Asia{{!}}Country|city_1=Greater Jakarta|div_1=Indonesia|pop_1=31,673,824<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021">Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta, 2021.</ref><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020">{{cite web |date=21 January 2021 |title=Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020 |url=https://www.bps.go.id/website/materi_ind/materiBrsInd-20210121151046.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122154418/https://www.bps.go.id/website/materi_ind/materiBrsInd-20210121151046.pdf |archive-date=22 January 2021 |access-date=21 January 2021 |publisher=[[Statistics Indonesia]] |page=9 |language=id}}</ref>|city_2=Greater Manila Area|div_2=Philippines|pop_2=28,250,517{{PH census|2015|NCR}}|city_3=Ho Chi Minh City metropolitan area|div_3=Vietnam|pop_3=21,281,639<ref name="VIET NAM POPULATION">{{Cite journal |date=2020 |title=COMPLETED RESULTS OF THE 2019 VIET NAM POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS |url=https://www.gso.gov.vn/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Ket-qua-toan-bo-Tong-dieu-tra-dan-so-va-nha-o-2019.pdf |journal=[[General Statistics Office of Vietnam]]}}</ref>|city_4=Hanoi Capital Region|div_4=Vietnam|pop_4=19,980,000<ref name="VIET NAM POPULATION" />|city_5=Bangkok Metropolitan Region|div_5=Thailand|pop_5=10,696,258<ref name="TDD20">{{cite web |date=31 December 2020 |title=รายงานสถิติจำนวนประชากรและบ้านประจำปี พ.ศ.2563 |trans-title=Statistics, population and house statistics for the year 2020 |url=https://stat.bora.dopa.go.th/new_stat/file/63/stat_a63.txt |access-date=27 May 2021 |language=th |department=Registration Office Department of the Interior, Ministry of the Interior}}</ref>|city_6=Greater Surabaya|div_6=Indonesia|pop_6=9,924,509<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021" /><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020" />|city_7=Greater Bandung|div_7=Indonesia|pop_7=8,790,308<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021" /><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020" />|city_8=Klang Valley|div_8=Malaysia|pop_8=8,455,029<ref name="MyCenDash">{{cite web |title=Workbook: MyCenDash(English) |url=https://tableau.dosm.gov.my/t/BPPD-BahagianperangkaanpendudukdanDemografi/views/MyCenDashEnglish/LOCALAUTORITY?:display_count=n&:embed=y&:isGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y&:origin=viz_share_link&:showAppBanner=false&:showVizHome=n |access-date=2023-10-19 |website=tableau.dosm.gov.my}}</ref>|city_9=Yangon Region|div_9=Myanmar|pop_9=7,360,703<ref name="census-2014">{{cite book |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B067GBtstE5TeUlIVjRjSjVzWlk/view |title=Census Report |date=May 2015 |publisher=Ministry of Immigration and Population |series=The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census |volume=2 |location=Naypyitaw |page=17}}</ref>|city_10=Semarang metropolitan area|div_10=Indonesia|pop_10=6,009,982<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021" /><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020" />|city_11=Singapore|div_11=Singapore|pop_11=5,685,807<ref>{{Cite web |title=Population |url=https://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/reference/ebook/population/population |website=Department of Statistics Singapore}}</ref>|city_12=Da Nang|div_12=Vietnam|pop_12=5,622,814<ref name="VIET NAM POPULATION" />|city_13=Greater Medan|div_13=Indonesia|pop_13=4,756,863<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021" /><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020" />|city_14=Metro Davao|div_14=Philippines|pop_14=3,339,284{{PH census|2015|NCR}}|city_15=Metro Cebu|div_15=Philippines|pop_15=3,165,799{{PH census|2015|NCR}}|city_16=George Town Conurbation|div_16=Malaysia|pop_16=2,843,344<ref name="MyCenDash" />|city_17=Makassar metropolitan area|div_17=Indonesia|pop_17=2,725,951<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021" /><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020" />|city_18=Palembang metropolitan area|div_18=Indonesia|pop_18=2,634,501<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021" /><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020" />|city_19=Phnom Penh|div_19=Cambodia|pop_19=2,506,123<ref name="census2019">{{Cite web |date=26 January 2021 |title=General Population Census of the Kingdom of Cambodia 2019 – Final Results |url=http://nis.gov.kh/nis/Census2019/Final%20General%20Population%20Census%202019-English.pdf |access-date=26 January 2021 |work=National Institute of Statistics |publisher=[[Ministry of Planning (Cambodia)|Ministry of Planning]]}}</ref>|city_20=Greater Yogyakarta|div_20=Indonesia|pop_20=2,485,163<ref name="Badan Pusat Statistik 2021" /><ref name="Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020" />}}


==Culture==
==Culture==
The organization hosts cultural activities in an attempt to further integrate the region. These include sports and educational activities as well as writing awards. Examples of these include the [[ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity]], [[ASEAN Heritage Parks]]<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Heritage Parks|url=http://chm.aseanbiodiversity.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=110&current=110|website=Biodiversity Information Sharing Service|publisher=ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity (ACB)|access-date=25 June 2015|archive-date=2 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402132522/http://chm.aseanbiodiversity.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=110&current=110|url-status=live}}</ref> and the [[ASEAN Outstanding Scientist and Technologist Award]]. In addition, the ASEAN region has been recognized as one of the world's most diverse regions ethnically, religiously and linguistically.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lehmann |first1=Jean-Pierre |title=What's Next For ASEAN |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jplehmann/2017/04/26/whats-next-for-asean/#54a0054656d0 |work=Forbes |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053335/https://www.forbes.com/sites/jplehmann/2017/04/26/whats-next-for-asean/#54a0054656d0 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Zein |first1=Mksabbirrahman |last2=Stroupe |first2=Richmond |title=English and language-in-education policy in the ASEAN Plus Three Forum |journal=Asian Englishes |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=193–196|doi=10.1080/13488678.2017.1389061 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
[[File:Wat Ounalom 4.jpg|thumb|240x240px|ASEAN ceremonial giant gong at [[Wat Ounalom]] Monastery in [[Phnom Penh]], Cambodia]]
The organisation hosts cultural activities in an attempt to further integrate the region. These include sports and educational activities as well as writing awards. Examples of these include the [[ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity]], [[ASEAN Heritage Parks]]<ref>{{cite web|title=ASEAN Heritage Parks|url=http://chm.aseanbiodiversity.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=110&current=110|website=Biodiversity Information Sharing Service|publisher=ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity (ACB)|access-date=25 June 2015|archive-date=2 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402132522/http://chm.aseanbiodiversity.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=110&current=110|url-status=live}}</ref> and the [[ASEAN Outstanding Scientist and Technologist Award]]. In addition, the ASEAN region has been recognised as one of the world's most diverse regions ethnically, religiously and linguistically.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lehmann |first1=Jean-Pierre |title=What's Next For ASEAN |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jplehmann/2017/04/26/whats-next-for-asean/#54a0054656d0 |work=Forbes |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053335/https://www.forbes.com/sites/jplehmann/2017/04/26/whats-next-for-asean/#54a0054656d0 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Zein |first1=Subhan |last2=Stroupe |first2=Richmond |title=English and language-in-education policy in the ASEAN Plus Three Forum |journal=Asian Englishes |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=193–196|doi=10.1080/13488678.2017.1389061 |date=2 September 2017|doi-access=free }}</ref>


===Media===
===Media===
Member states have promoted co-operation in information to help build an ASEAN identity. One of the main bodies in ASEAN co-operation in information is the ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information (COCI). Established in 1978, its mission is to promote effective co-operation in the fields of information, as well as culture, through its various projects and activities. It includes representatives from national institutions like the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministries of Culture and Information, national radio and television networks, museums, archives and libraries, among others. Together, they meet once a year to formulate and agree on projects to fulfil their mission.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-ministers-responsible-for-information-amri|title=ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information (AMRI)|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150627073720/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-ministers-responsible-for-information-amri|archive-date=27 June 2015}}</ref> On 14 November 2014, foreign ministers of member states launched the ASEAN Communication Master Plan (ACPM).<ref name="ACMP">{{cite book|title=ASEAN Communication Master Plan – ASEAN: A Community of Opportunities|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat; Public Outreach and Civil Society Division|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-0980-02-7|url=http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/ACMP_Print_pdf_final.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203744/http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/ACMP_Print_pdf_final.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> It provides a framework for communicating the character, structure, and overall vision of ASEAN and the ASEAN community to key audiences within the region and globally.<ref name="ACMP-Remarks">{{cite web|title=Opening Remarks by Secretary-General of ASEAN, H.E. Le Luong Minh at the Launching of the ASEAN Communication Master Plan|url=http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/Remarks_SG_forACMP_Launch_POCS.pdf|website=ASEAN|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/Remarks_SG_forACMP_Launch_POCS.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref> The plan seeks to demonstrate the relevance and benefits of the ASEAN through fact-based and compelling communications, recognising that the ASEAN community is unique and different from other country integration models.
[[File:Press at ASEAN 2018 Press Conference (28897538337).jpg|thumb|ASEAN 2018 Press Conference in Singapore, cooperative efforts within SEA media was set by ACPM standards]]
Member states have promoted co-operation in information to help build an ASEAN identity. One of the main bodies in ASEAN co-operation in information is the ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information (COCI). Established in 1978, its mission is to promote effective co-operation in the fields of information, as well as culture, through its various projects and activities. It includes representatives from national institutions like the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministries of Culture and Information, national radio and television networks, museums, archives and libraries, among others. The representatives meet annually to formulate and agree on projects in support of their mission.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-ministers-responsible-for-information-amri|title=ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information (AMRI)|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150627073720/http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/category/asean-ministers-responsible-for-information-amri|archive-date=27 June 2015}}</ref> On 14 November 2014, foreign ministers of member states launched the ASEAN Communication Master Plan (ACPM).<ref name="ACMP">{{cite book|title=ASEAN Communication Master Plan – ASEAN: A Community of Opportunities|date=Oct 2014|publisher=ASEAN Secretariat; Public Outreach and Civil Society Division|location=Jakarta|isbn=978-602-0980-02-7|url=http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/ACMP_Print_pdf_final.pdf|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205203744/http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/ACMP_Print_pdf_final.pdf|archive-date=5 February 2015}}</ref> It provides a framework for communicating the character, structure, and overall vision of ASEAN and the ASEAN community to key audiences within the region and globally.<ref name="ACMP-Remarks">{{cite web|title=Opening Remarks by Secretary-General of ASEAN, H.E. Le Luong Minh at the Launching of the ASEAN Communication Master Plan|url=http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/Remarks_SG_forACMP_Launch_POCS.pdf|website=ASEAN|access-date=10 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/pdf/2014_upload/Remarks_SG_forACMP_Launch_POCS.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2015}}</ref>


ASEAN Media Cooperation (AMC) sets digital television standards and policies in preparation for broadcasters to transition from analogue to digital broadcasting. This collaboration was conceptualised during the 11th ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information (AMRI) Conference in Malaysia on 1 March 2012 where a consensus declared that both new and traditional media were keys to connecting ASEAN peoples and bridging cultural gaps in the region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pia.gov.ph/news/index.php?article=2101331018243 |archive-url=https://archive.today/2012.12.22-010758/http://www.pia.gov.ph/news/index.php?article=2101331018243 |archive-date=22 December 2012 |title=ASEAN Promotes Use of Social Media |work=Philippine Information Agency |access-date=1 October 2012 }}</ref> Several key initiatives under the AMC include:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mda.gov.sg/International/Pages/ASEAN.aspx |title=Deepening ASEAN Media Cooperation Within and Beyond |publisher=Media Development Authority |access-date=31 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120510001847/http://www.mda.gov.sg/International/Pages/ASEAN.aspx |archive-date=10 May 2012 }}</ref>
ASEAN Media Cooperation (AMC) sets digital television standards and policies in preparation for broadcasters to transition from analogue to digital broadcasting. This collaboration was conceptualised during the 11th ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information (AMRI) Conference in Malaysia on 1 March 2012 where a consensus declared that both new and traditional media were keys to connecting ASEAN peoples and bridging cultural gaps in the region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pia.gov.ph/news/index.php?article=2101331018243 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20121222010758/http://www.pia.gov.ph/news/index.php?article=2101331018243 |archive-date=22 December 2012 |title=ASEAN Promotes Use of Social Media |work=Philippine Information Agency |access-date=1 October 2012 }}</ref> Several key initiatives under the AMC include:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mda.gov.sg/International/Pages/ASEAN.aspx |title=Deepening ASEAN Media Cooperation Within and Beyond |publisher=Media Development Authority |access-date=31 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120510001847/http://www.mda.gov.sg/International/Pages/ASEAN.aspx |archive-date=10 May 2012 }}</ref>
* The ASEAN Media Portal<ref>{{cite web|last=Media Development Authority |title=New Media Portal to Enhance ASEAN'S COCI Website and Offer Access to the Region's Media Industry |url=http://www.mda.gov.sg/NewsAndEvents/PressRelease/2007/Pages/16112007a.aspx |access-date=1 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110206072830/http://mda.gov.sg/NewsAndEvents/PressRelease/2007/Pages/16112007a.aspx |archive-date=6 February 2011 }}</ref> was launched 16 November 2007. The portal aims to provide a one-stop site that contains documentaries, games, music videos, and multimedia clips on the culture, arts, and heritage of the ASEAN countries to showcase ASEAN culture and the capabilities of its media industry.
* The ASEAN Media Portal<ref>{{cite web|last=Media Development Authority |title=New Media Portal to Enhance ASEAN'S COCI Website and Offer Access to the Region's Media Industry |url=http://www.mda.gov.sg/NewsAndEvents/PressRelease/2007/Pages/16112007a.aspx |access-date=1 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110206072830/http://mda.gov.sg/NewsAndEvents/PressRelease/2007/Pages/16112007a.aspx |archive-date=6 February 2011 }}</ref> was launched 16 November 2007. The portal aims to provide a one-stop site that contains documentaries, games, music videos, and multimedia clips on the culture, arts, and heritage of the ASEAN countries to showcase ASEAN culture and the capabilities of its media industry.
* The ASEAN NewsMaker Project, an initiative launched in 2009, trains students and teachers to produce informational video clips about their countries. The project was initiated by Singapore. Students trained in NewsMaker software, video production, together with developing narrative storytelling skills. Dr Soeung Rathchavy, Deputy Secretary-General of ASEAN for ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community noted that: "Raising ASEAN awareness amongst the youth is part and parcel of our efforts to build the ASEAN Community by 2015. Using ICT and the media, our youths in the region will get to know ASEAN better, deepening their understanding and appreciation of the cultures, social traditions and values in ASEAN."<ref>{{Cite web|title = Launch of the ASEAN NewsMaker Project: Students to promote cross-cultural understanding by creating video clips for ASEAN Media Portal, Singapore, 2 June 2009|url = http://www.asean.org/news/asean-statement-communiques/item/launch-of-the-asean-newsmaker-project-students-to-promote-cross-cultural-understanding-by-creating-video-clips-for-asean-media-portal-singapore-2-june-2009|website = www.asean.org|access-date = 25 August 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/news/asean-statement-communiques/item/launch-of-the-asean-newsmaker-project-students-to-promote-cross-cultural-understanding-by-creating-video-clips-for-asean-media-portal-singapore-2-june-2009|archive-date = 4 September 2015}}</ref>
* The ASEAN NewsMaker Project, an initiative launched in 2009, trains students and teachers to produce informational video clips about their countries. The project was initiated by Singapore. Students trained in NewsMaker software, video production, together with developing narrative storytelling skills. Dr Soeung Rathchavy, Deputy Secretary-General of ASEAN for ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community noted that: "Raising ASEAN awareness amongst the youth is part and parcel of our efforts to build the ASEAN Community by 2015. Using ICT and the media, our youths in the region will get to know ASEAN better, deepening their understanding and appreciation of the cultures, social traditions and values in ASEAN."<ref>{{Cite web|title = Launch of the ASEAN NewsMaker Project: Students to promote cross-cultural understanding by creating video clips for ASEAN Media Portal, Singapore, 2 June 2009|url = http://www.asean.org/news/asean-statement-communiques/item/launch-of-the-asean-newsmaker-project-students-to-promote-cross-cultural-understanding-by-creating-video-clips-for-asean-media-portal-singapore-2-june-2009|website = asean.org|access-date = 25 August 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/news/asean-statement-communiques/item/launch-of-the-asean-newsmaker-project-students-to-promote-cross-cultural-understanding-by-creating-video-clips-for-asean-media-portal-singapore-2-june-2009|archive-date = 4 September 2015}}</ref>
* The ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting, is an annual forum for ASEAN members to set digital television (DTV) standards and policies, and to discuss progress in the implementation of the blueprint from analogue to digital TV broadcasting by 2020. During the 11th ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting<ref>{{cite web|work=ASEAN Secretariat News|title=11th ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting|url=http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/11th-asean-digital-broadcasting-meeting|access-date=1 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130530020045/http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/11th-asean-digital-broadcasting-meeting|archive-date=30 May 2013}}</ref> members updated the status on DTV implementation and agreed to inform ASEAN members on the ''Guidelines for ASEAN Digital Switchover''.<ref>{{cite web|title=Guidelines for ASEAN Digital Switch-Over|url=http://hq.prd.go.th/engineer/download/Genenal/Guidelines%20for%20ASEAN%20Digital%20Switch-Over_Final.pdf|publisher=ASEAN|access-date=10 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304002205/http://hq.prd.go.th/engineer/download/Genenal/Guidelines%20for%20ASEAN%20Digital%20Switch-Over_Final.pdf|archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref> An issue was raised around the availability and affordability of [[set-top box]]es (STB), thus ASEAN members were asked to make policies to determine funding for STBs, methods of allocation, subsidies and rebates, and other methods for the allocation of STBs. It was also agreed in the meeting to form a task force to develop STB specifications for [[DVB-T2]] to ensure efficiency.
* The ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting, is an annual forum for ASEAN members to set digital television (DTV) standards and policies, and to discuss progress in the implementation of the blueprint from analogue to digital TV broadcasting by 2020. During the 11th ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting<ref>{{cite web|work=ASEAN Secretariat News|title=11th ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting|url=http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/11th-asean-digital-broadcasting-meeting|access-date=1 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130530020045/http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/11th-asean-digital-broadcasting-meeting|archive-date=30 May 2013}}</ref> members updated the status on DTV implementation and agreed to inform ASEAN members on the ''Guidelines for ASEAN Digital Switchover''.<ref>{{cite web|title=Guidelines for ASEAN Digital Switch-Over|url=http://hq.prd.go.th/engineer/download/Genenal/Guidelines%20for%20ASEAN%20Digital%20Switch-Over_Final.pdf|publisher=ASEAN|access-date=10 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304002205/http://hq.prd.go.th/engineer/download/Genenal/Guidelines%20for%20ASEAN%20Digital%20Switch-Over_Final.pdf|archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref> An issue was raised around the availability and affordability of [[set-top box]]es (STB), thus ASEAN members were asked to make policies to determine funding for STBs, methods of allocation, subsidies and rebates, and other methods for the allocation of STBs. It was also agreed in the meeting to form a task force to develop STB specifications for [[DVB-T2]] to ensure efficiency.
*The ASEAN Post was launched on 8 August 2017 to commemorate ASEAN's 50th Anniversary. It is an independent regional digital media company that is headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It was founded by former investment banker Rohan Ramakrishnan.
*The ASEAN Post was launched on 8 August 2017 to commemorate ASEAN's 50th Anniversary. It is an independent regional digital media company that is headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It was founded by former investment banker Rohan Ramakrishnan.


[[File:ASEAN Nations Flags in Jakarta 3.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|The flags of the ASEAN member states in [[Jakarta]], [[Indonesia]]]]
====[[Public broadcasting|National public]]/[[state media|state-owned]] [[radio station|radio]] and [[television station|television network]]s of ASEAN====
* {{flagcountry|Brunei}}: [[Radio Television Brunei]]
* {{flagcountry|Cambodia}}: [[Bayon Television]] and [[National Television of Cambodia]]
* {{flagcountry|Indonesia}}: [[TVRI|Televisi Republik Indonesia]] and [[Radio Republik Indonesia]]
* {{flagcountry|Laos}}: [[Lao National Radio]] and [[Lao National Television]]
* {{flagcountry|Malaysia}}: [[Radio Televisyen Malaysia]]
* {{flagcountry|Myanmar}}: [[Myanmar International]], [[Myanmar National TV|Myanmar National Television]] and [[Myanmar Radio and Television]]
* {{flagcountry|Philippines}}: [[People's Television Network]], [[Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation]] and [[Presidential Broadcast Service]]
* {{flagcountry|Singapore}}: [[Mediacorp]]
* {{flagcountry|Thailand}}: [[MCOT]], [[National Broadcasting Services of Thailand]], [[Radio Thailand]], [[Channel 5 (Thailand)|Royal Thai Army Radio and Television Station]] and [[Thai Public Broadcasting Service]]
* {{flagcountry|Timor-Leste}}: [[Radio-Televisão Timor Leste]]
* {{flagcountry|Vietnam}}: [[Ho Chi Minh City Television]], [[Vietnam Television]] and [[Voice of Vietnam]]


===Music===
===Music===
Music plays a significant role in ASEAN affairs, as evidenced by the new music composed for, and to be performed at, the 34th ASEAN Summit in Bangkok in June 2019.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Phataranawik |first1=Phatarawadee |title=Asean's message to the world takes musical flight |url=http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30371538 |access-date=22 June 2019 |work=The Nation |archive-date=22 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190622013555/http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30371538 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Music plays a significant role in ASEAN affairs, as evidenced by the new music composed for, and to be performed at, the 34th ASEAN Summit in Bangkok in June 2019.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Phataranawik |first1=Phatarawadee |title=Asean's message to the world takes musical flight |url=https://www.nationthailand.com/detail/national/30371538 |access-date=22 June 2019 |work=The Nation |date=22 June 2019 |archive-date=22 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190622013555/http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30371538 |url-status=live }}</ref>


Since ASEAN's founding, a number of songs have been written for the regional alliance:
Since ASEAN's founding, a number of songs have been written for the regional alliance:
Line 543: Line 689:
* "ASEAN Spirit", ASEAN's 50th anniversary song. Composed by Chino Toledo. Lyrics by [[National Artist of the Philippines|National Artist for Literature]], [[Rio Alma]]. Performed by [[Christian Bautista]]; video directed by Joaquin Pedro Valdes.
* "ASEAN Spirit", ASEAN's 50th anniversary song. Composed by Chino Toledo. Lyrics by [[National Artist of the Philippines|National Artist for Literature]], [[Rio Alma]]. Performed by [[Christian Bautista]]; video directed by Joaquin Pedro Valdes.


===Sports===
=== Sports ===
The main sporting event of ASEAN is the Southeast Asian Games, a biennial meet of athletes from the ten member-states. A non-member state Timor Leste (also known as East Timor) is now participating the SEA Games.
The main sporting event of ASEAN is the Southeast Asian Games, a biennial meet of athletes from the eleven member-states.
* [[Southeast Asian Games]]
 
* [[ASEAN University Games]]
==== Games events ====
* [[ASEAN School Games]]
# [[SEA Games]]
* [[ASEAN Para Games]]
# [[ASEAN University Games]]
* [[AFF Championship]]
# [[ASEAN School Games]]
* [[SEABA Championship]]
# [[ASEAN Para Games]]
 
==== Championships events ====
[[File:National Stadium Bukit Jalil 2014 AFF Suzuki Cup final.jpg|thumb|[[Bukit Jalil National Stadium]] during the second leg of the [[2014 AFF Championship]] final]]
[[File:East Timor-Brunei 8 October 2024 79.jpg|thumb|Team Timor-Leste scoring a goal at the [[2024 ASEAN Championship]]]]
[[File:ASEAN_Sport_Day_2024_at_Prambanan_Temple_10-AUG-2024.jpg|thumb|A contingent from Brunei Darussalam playing ''[[Gasing pangkah|gasing]]'', in front of [[Prambanan|Candi Prambanan]] during ASEAN Sports Day.]]
# [[ASEAN Championship|Southeast Asian Football Championship (ASEAN Championship)]] – Since 1996
# [[Southeast Asian Basketball Championship|Southeast Asian Basketball Championship (SEABA Championship)]] – Since 1994
# [[Southeast Asian Shooting Championship]] – Since 1967 - South East Asia Shooting Championship - 46th SEASA in 2025 in {{TPE}} <ref>southeastasiansportsnews.blogspot.com/2018/10/42nd-southeast-asia-seasa-shooting.html</ref> With HKG, TPE and some of JPN and Korea.
# [[Southeast Asian Cricket Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Handball Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Floorball Championships]]
# [[Southeast Asian Hockey Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Baseball Championship]]
# [[SEA V.League|Southeast Asian Volleyball Championship (SEA V.League)]] – Since 2019
# [[Southeast Asian Sepaktakraw Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Footvolley Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Youth Athletics Championships]]
# [[Southeast Asian Swimming Championships]]
# [[Southeast Asian Gymnastics Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Cycling Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Shooting Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Archery Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Sailing Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Rowing Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Canoeing Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Boxing Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Fencing Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Kurash Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Wrestling Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Weightlifting Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Powerlifting Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Bodybuilding Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Judo Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Jujitsu Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Muaythai Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Sambo Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Vovinam Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Karate Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Taekwondo Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Wushu Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Pencak Silat Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Badminton Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Tennis Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Table Tennis Championships]]
# [[Southeast Asian Squash Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Chess Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Triathlon Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Golf Championship]] ([[ASEAN PGA Tour]]) – Since 2007
# [[Southeast Asian Esports Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Bowling Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Cue Sports Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Arnis Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Chinlone Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Contract Bridge Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Bowls Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Go Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Dragon Boat Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Obstacle Racing Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Polo Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Waterskiing Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Woodball Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Finswimming Championship]]
# [[Southeast Asian Kun Khmer Championship]]


==Global influence and reception==
==Global influence and reception==
ASEAN has been credited by many as among the world's most influential organisations and a global powerhouse.<ref name="aseanvisa"/><ref name="aseanblock"/> The organisation plays a prominent role in regional and international diplomacy, politics, security, economy and trade.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lee |first1=Sze Ming |title=ASEAN in the Changing Asia Pacific Security Order |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326208056 |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053351/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326208056_ASEAN_in_the_Changing_Asia_Pacific_Security_Order |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="jstor.org">{{cite journal|title=Asean's Pivotal Role in Asian-Pacific Regional Cooperation|journal = Global Governance|volume = 3|issue = 3|last1=Haas|first1=Michael|pages=329–348|jstor = 27800175|doi = 10.1163/19426720-00303009}}</ref><ref name="aseansummit2">{{cite news|url= https://www.untvweb.com/news/world-leaders-praised-the-philippines-on-how-it-hosted-the-asean-summit/|title= World leaders praised the Philippines on how it hosted the ASEAN Summit|publisher= UNTV News|work= untvweb.com|access-date= 7 December 2017|archive-date= 15 June 2018|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180615222947/https://www.untvweb.com/news/world-leaders-praised-the-philippines-on-how-it-hosted-the-asean-summit/}}</ref><ref name="news.teletrader.com">{{cite news|url=https://news.teletrader.com/russia-supports-increasing-aseans-global-influence/news/details/37150210?culture=en-Inter|title=Russia supports increasing ASEAN's global influence|website=news.teletrader.com}}{{Dead link|bot=Kumar Blog |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://asean.org/?static_post=the-world-to-come-asean-s-political-and-economic-prospects-in-the-new-century |title= The World to Come: ASEAN's Political and Economic Prospects in the New Century |website= asean.org |access-date= 29 November 2018 |archive-date= 30 September 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053320/https://asean.org/?static_post=the-world-to-come-asean-s-political-and-economic-prospects-in-the-new-century |url-status= live }}</ref><ref name="siiaonline.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.siiaonline.org/|title=Singapore Institute of International Affairs {{!}} A think tank for thinking people|website=siiaonline.org|access-date=26 November 2017|archive-date=2 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171202011313/http://www.siiaonline.org/}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= What Are the Opportunities for ASEAN? |url= https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-are-the-opportunities-for-asean |website= Yale Insights |access-date= 17 September 2018 |archive-date= 30 September 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053341/https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-are-the-opportunities-for-asean |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN, an important regional and global partner |url=https://english.vov.vn/politics/asean-an-important-regional-and-global-partner-355925.vov |work=VOV.vn |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=7 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171007011541/http://english.vov.vn/politics/asean-an-important-regional-and-global-partner-355925.vov |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="ASEAN's rise in the global economy">{{cite news|url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2013/03/aseans-rise-in-the-global-economy/|title=ASEAN's rise in the global economy|work=World Economic Forum|access-date=17 September 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053356/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2013/03/aseans-rise-in-the-global-economy/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Canberra">{{Cite web|url=https://www.pecc.org/resources/regional-cooperation/601-back-to-canberra-founding-apec/file|title=The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years, chapter 5: Back to Canberra: Founding APEC|last=Elek|first=Andrew|via=pecc.org|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=29 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329012108/https://www.pecc.org/resources/regional-cooperation/601-back-to-canberra-founding-apec/file|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="mea.gov.in">{{Cite news |url= http://mea.gov.in/aseanindia/about-eas.htm |title= India at the East Asia Summit |work= mea.gov.in |publisher= Ministry of External Affairs, India |access-date= 21 February 2019 |archive-date= 23 February 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190223233245/http://www.mea.gov.in/aseanindia/about-eas.htm |url-status= live }}</ref><ref name="Conclusion for RCEP">{{Cite news|url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-pm-lee-10662722|title=Conclusion for RCEP|work=channelnewsasia.com|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=16 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916164051/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/asean-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-pm-lee-10662722|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Excessive citations inline}} The [[ASEAN Free Trade Area]] also stands as one of the largest and most important free trade areas in the world, and together with its network of dialogue partners, drove some of the world's largest multilateral forums and blocs, including [[Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation|APEC]], [[East Asia Summit|EAS]] and [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership|RCEP]].<ref name="mea.gov.in" /><ref name="ReferenceD">{{cite news|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/02/06/trade-agreements-are-in-aseans-best-interests/|title=Trade agreements are in ASEAN's best interests|work=EastAsiaForum.org|access-date=17 September 2018|archive-date=9 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190309091059/http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/02/06/trade-agreements-are-in-aseans-best-interests/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ASEAN's role in Asia Pacific: In the driver's seat or just a back-seat driver? |url=https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=ami |website=smu.edu.sg |last=Devare |first=Sudhir |publisher=[[Singapore Management University]] |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=17 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180917181851/https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=ami |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=History |url=https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/History |website=apec.org |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=4 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190304034820/http://apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/History |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name= Canberra /><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/2014/02/13/understanding-aseans-free-trade-agreements.html|title=Understanding ASEAN free trade agreements|work=aseanbriefing.com|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=27 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190127035750/https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/2014/02/13/understanding-aseans-free-trade-agreements.html|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Excessive citations inline}} Being one of the world's forefront political, economic and security meetings, the [[ASEAN Summit]] serves as a prominent regional (Asia) and international (worldwide) conference, with world leaders attending its related summits and meetings to discuss about various problems and global issues, strengthening cooperation, and making decisions.<ref name="aseanroadmap">{{cite book|title=Roadmap to an Asean Economic Community| first= Denis | last= Hew|publisher= Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|year=2005|isbn= 978-981-230-347-9}}</ref><ref name="manilasummit">{{cite web | url= http://m.philstar.com/782974/show/7eb7803727e8504defe21782560fab71/? | title= World leaders in Manila: Key events at ASEAN | work= The Philippine Star | via= philstar.com | access-date= 5 March 2018 | archive-date= 1 December 2017 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171201035820/http://m.philstar.com/782974/show/7eb7803727e8504defe21782560fab71/ }}</ref>
[[File:P20220512KR-0089-2 (52142897722).jpg|thumb|President [[Joe Biden]] and ASEAN leaders pose for a family photo at the US-ASEAN Summit]]
ASEAN has been credited by many as among the world's most influential organisations and a global powerhouse.<ref name="aseanvisa">{{cite web |date=June 2016 |title=This is why ASEAN needs a common visa |url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/asean-one-visa-travel-destination/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190625002815/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/asean-one-visa-travel-destination/ |archive-date=25 June 2019 |access-date=18 March 2018 |website=World Economic Forum}}</ref><ref name="aseanblock">{{cite web |title=ASEAN bloc must be tapped |url=https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/asean-bloc-must-be-tapped/news-story/59d00e4f65a6084f4be157ee95da3534 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200424002421/https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/asean-bloc-must-be-tapped/news-story/59d00e4f65a6084f4be157ee95da3534 |archive-date=24 April 2020 |access-date=18 March 2018 |website=theaustralian.com.au}}</ref> The organisation plays a prominent role in regional and international diplomacy, politics, security, economy and trade.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lee |first1=Sze Ming |title=ASEAN in the Changing Asia Pacific Security Order |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326208056 |date=5 July 2018 |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053351/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326208056_ASEAN_in_the_Changing_Asia_Pacific_Security_Order |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="jstor.org">{{cite journal|title=Asean's Pivotal Role in Asian-Pacific Regional Cooperation|journal = Global Governance|volume = 3|issue = 3|last1=Haas|first1=Michael|date=1997|pages=329–348|jstor = 27800175|doi = 10.1163/19426720-00303009}}</ref><ref name="aseansummit2">{{cite news|url= https://www.untvweb.com/news/world-leaders-praised-the-philippines-on-how-it-hosted-the-asean-summit/|title= World leaders praised the Philippines on how it hosted the ASEAN Summit|publisher= UNTV News|work= untvweb.com|access-date= 7 December 2017|archive-date= 15 June 2018|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180615222947/https://www.untvweb.com/news/world-leaders-praised-the-philippines-on-how-it-hosted-the-asean-summit/}}</ref><ref name="news.teletrader.com">{{cite news|url=https://news.teletrader.com/russia-supports-increasing-aseans-global-influence/news/details/37150210?culture=en-Inter|title=Russia supports increasing ASEAN's global influence|website=news.teletrader.com}}{{Dead link|date=September 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://asean.org/?static_post=the-world-to-come-asean-s-political-and-economic-prospects-in-the-new-century |title= The World to Come: ASEAN's Political and Economic Prospects in the New Century |website= asean.org |access-date= 29 November 2018 |archive-date= 30 September 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053320/https://asean.org/?static_post=the-world-to-come-asean-s-political-and-economic-prospects-in-the-new-century |url-status= live }}</ref><ref name="siiaonline.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.siiaonline.org/|title=Singapore Institute of International Affairs {{!}} A think tank for thinking people|website=siiaonline.org|access-date=26 November 2017|archive-date=2 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171202011313/http://www.siiaonline.org/}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= What Are the Opportunities for ASEAN? |url= https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-are-the-opportunities-for-asean |website= Yale Insights |date= 14 July 2017 |access-date= 17 September 2018 |archive-date= 30 September 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053341/https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-are-the-opportunities-for-asean |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=ASEAN, an important regional and global partner |url=https://english.vov.vn/politics/asean-an-important-regional-and-global-partner-355925.vov |work=VOV.vn |date=5 August 2017 |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=7 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171007011541/http://english.vov.vn/politics/asean-an-important-regional-and-global-partner-355925.vov |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="ASEAN's rise in the global economy">{{cite news|url=https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2013/03/aseans-rise-in-the-global-economy/|title=ASEAN's rise in the global economy|work=World Economic Forum|access-date=17 September 2018|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053356/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2013/03/aseans-rise-in-the-global-economy/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Canberra">{{Cite web|url=https://www.pecc.org/resources/regional-cooperation/601-back-to-canberra-founding-apec/file|title=The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years, chapter 5: Back to Canberra: Founding APEC|last=Elek|first=Andrew|date=30 September 2005|via=pecc.org|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=29 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329012108/https://www.pecc.org/resources/regional-cooperation/601-back-to-canberra-founding-apec/file|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="mea.gov.in">{{Cite news |url= http://mea.gov.in/aseanindia/about-eas.htm |title= India at the East Asia Summit |date= August 2018 |work= mea.gov.in |publisher= Ministry of External Affairs, India |access-date= 21 February 2019 |archive-date= 23 February 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190223233245/http://www.mea.gov.in/aseanindia/about-eas.htm |url-status= live }}</ref><ref name="Conclusion for RCEP" />{{Excessive citations inline|date=February 2021}} The [[ASEAN Free Trade Area]] also stands as one of the largest and most important free trade areas in the world, and together with its network of dialogue partners, drove some of the world's largest multilateral forums and blocs, including [[Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation|APEC]], [[East Asia Summit|EAS]] and [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership|RCEP]].<ref name="mea.gov.in" /><ref name="ReferenceD">{{cite news|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/02/06/trade-agreements-are-in-aseans-best-interests/|title=Trade agreements are in ASEAN's best interests|date=6 February 2016|work=EastAsiaForum.org|access-date=17 September 2018|archive-date=9 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190309091059/http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/02/06/trade-agreements-are-in-aseans-best-interests/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ASEAN's role in Asia Pacific: In the driver's seat or just a back-seat driver? |url=https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=ami |website=smu.edu.sg |last=Devare |first=Sudhir |publisher=[[Singapore Management University]] |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=17 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180917181851/https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=ami |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=History |url=https://www.apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/History |website=apec.org |access-date=17 September 2018 |archive-date=4 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190304034820/http://apec.org/About-Us/About-APEC/History |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Canberra" /><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/2014/02/13/understanding-aseans-free-trade-agreements.html|title=Understanding ASEAN free trade agreements|work=aseanbriefing.com|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=27 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190127035750/https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/2014/02/13/understanding-aseans-free-trade-agreements.html|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Excessive citations inline|date=February 2021}} Being one of the world's forefront political, economic and security meetings, the [[ASEAN Summit]] serves as a prominent regional (Asia) and international (worldwide) conference, with world leaders attending its related summits and meetings to discuss about various problems and global issues, strengthening cooperation, and making decisions.<ref name="aseanroadmap">{{cite book|title=Roadmap to an Asean Economic Community| first= Denis | last= Hew|publisher= Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|year=2005|isbn= 978-981-230-347-9}}</ref><ref name="manilasummit">{{cite web | url= http://m.philstar.com/782974/show/7eb7803727e8504defe21782560fab71/? | title= World leaders in Manila: Key events at ASEAN | work= The Philippine Star | via= philstar.com | access-date= 5 March 2018 | archive-date= 1 December 2017 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171201035820/http://m.philstar.com/782974/show/7eb7803727e8504defe21782560fab71/ }}</ref>


Critics have charged ASEAN with weakly promoting human rights and democracy, particularly in junta-led Myanmar.<ref>{{cite news|title=ADB president calls for building Asian economic integration |url= http://peacejournalism.com/ReadArticle.asp?ArticleID=16729 |publisher= Peace Journalism |work= peacejournalism.com |access-date=3 April 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717061741/http://peacejournalism.com/ReadArticle.asp?ArticleID=16729 |archive-date= 17 July 2011 }}</ref> Some scholars think that non-interference has hindered ASEAN efforts to handle the Myanmar issue, human rights abuse, and haze pollution in the area. Despite global outrage at the military crack-down on unarmed protesters in Yangon, ASEAN has refused to suspend Myanmar as a member and also rejects proposals for economic sanctions.<ref>{{cite news |title= Japan Cancels Burma Grant |url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iy-MfhLN9Q7MwtQ1VlrvexLjr2dAD8SA9CS00 |agency=Associated Press |access-date=18 October 2007 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20071114032051/http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iy-MfhLN9Q7MwtQ1VlrvexLjr2dAD8SA9CS00| archive-date= 14 November 2007}}</ref> This has caused concern as the European Union has refused to conduct free trade negotiations at a regional level for these political reasons.<ref>{{cite news|title=Burma an Issue in Asean-EU Trade Talks |url=http://www.irrawaddy.org/aviewer.asp?a=6693&z=163 |first=Sai |last=Silp | work= The Irawaddy News Magazine Online Edition |via= irrawaddy.org |access-date=4 March 2007 }}{{dead link|bot= medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> During a UN vote against the ethnic cleansing of [[Rohingya]], most member states voted to either abstain or against the condemnation. Only the Muslim-majority countries Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei voted to condemn the cleansing of Rohingya.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/11/18/1760042/philippines-wont-join-un-condemnation-attacks-rohingya|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171225163157/http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/11/18/1760042/philippines-wont-join-un-condemnation-attacks-rohingya|archive-date=2017-12-25|title=Philippines won't join UN condemnation of attacks on Rohingya|work= philstar.com|access-date=16 April 2018}}</ref> Some international observers view ASEAN as a "talk shop",<ref>{{cite news |title=Malaysian foreign minister says ASEAN is no 'talk shop'|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2005_Dec_5/ai_n15900039 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012193523/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2005_Dec_5/ai_n15900039 |archive-date=12 October 2007 |access-date=6 March 2007 | work=Asian Political News}}</ref> stating that the organisation is: "big on words, but small on action".<ref>{{cite news |title=BBC Country/International Organisation Profile: Association of Southeast Asian Nations |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/country_profiles/4114415.stm |work=BBC News |access-date=6 March 2007 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070315215944/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/country_profiles/4114415.stm| archive-date= 15 March 2007 | url-status=live}}</ref> "ASEAN policies have proven to be mostly rhetoric, rather than actual implementation", according to Pokpong Lawansiri, a Bangkok-based independent analyst of ASEAN. "It has been noted that less than 50% of ASEAN agreements are actually implemented, while ASEAN holds more than six hundred meetings annually".<ref>{{cite web |last=McLean |first=John |url=http://development.asia/issue03/cover-03.asp |title=Will ASEAN's New Charter Bring Greater Cooperation? |work= Development Asia |publisher=Asian Development Bank | access-date=25 June 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706085143/http://development.asia/issue03/cover-03.asp |archive-date= 6 July 2011 }}</ref>
Critics have charged ASEAN with weakly promoting human rights and democracy, particularly in junta-led Myanmar.<ref>{{cite news|title=ADB president calls for building Asian economic integration |url= http://peacejournalism.com/ReadArticle.asp?ArticleID=16729 |publisher= Peace Journalism |date=3 January 2007 |work= peacejournalism.com |access-date=3 April 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717061741/http://peacejournalism.com/ReadArticle.asp?ArticleID=16729 |archive-date= 17 July 2011 }}</ref> Some scholars think that non-interference has hindered ASEAN efforts to handle the Myanmar issue, human rights abuse, and haze pollution in the area. Despite global outrage at the military crack-down on unarmed protesters in Yangon, ASEAN has refused to suspend Myanmar as a member and also rejects proposals for economic sanctions.<ref>{{cite news |title= Japan Cancels Burma Grant |url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iy-MfhLN9Q7MwtQ1VlrvexLjr2dAD8SA9CS00 |via=Associated Press |date=17 October 2007 |access-date=18 October 2007 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20071114032051/http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iy-MfhLN9Q7MwtQ1VlrvexLjr2dAD8SA9CS00| archive-date= 14 November 2007}}</ref> This has caused concern as the European Union has refused to conduct free trade negotiations at a regional level for these political reasons.<ref>{{cite news|title=Burma an Issue in Asean-EU Trade Talks |url=http://www.irrawaddy.org/aviewer.asp?a=6693&z=163 |first=Sai |last=Silp | work= The Irawaddy News Magazine Online Edition |via= irrawaddy.org |date=15 February 2007 |access-date=4 March 2007 }}{{dead link|date=June 2016|bot= medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> During a UN vote against the ethnic cleansing of [[Rohingya]], most member states voted to either abstain or against the condemnation. Only the Muslim-majority countries Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei voted to condemn the cleansing of Rohingya.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/11/18/1760042/philippines-wont-join-un-condemnation-attacks-rohingya|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171225163157/http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/11/18/1760042/philippines-wont-join-un-condemnation-attacks-rohingya|archive-date=2017-12-25|title=Philippines won't join UN condemnation of attacks on Rohingya|date=2017-11-18|work= philstar.com|access-date=16 April 2018}}</ref> Some international observers view ASEAN as a "talk shop",<ref>{{cite news |title=Malaysian foreign minister says ASEAN is no 'talk shop'|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2005_Dec_5/ai_n15900039 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012193523/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2005_Dec_5/ai_n15900039 |archive-date=12 October 2007 |date=5 December 2005 |access-date=6 March 2007 | work=Asian Political News}}</ref> stating that the organisation is: "big on words, but small on action".<ref>{{cite news |title=BBC Country/International Organisation Profile: Association of Southeast Asian Nations |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/country_profiles/4114415.stm |work=BBC News |date=11 January 2007 |access-date=6 March 2007 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070315215944/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/country_profiles/4114415.stm| archive-date= 15 March 2007 | url-status=live}}</ref> "ASEAN policies have proven to be mostly rhetoric, rather than actual implementation", according to Pokpong Lawansiri, a Bangkok-based independent analyst of ASEAN. "It has been noted that less than 50% of ASEAN agreements are actually implemented, while ASEAN holds more than six hundred meetings annually".<ref>{{cite web |last=McLean |first=John |url=http://development.asia/issue03/cover-03.asp |title=Will ASEAN's New Charter Bring Greater Cooperation? |work= Development Asia |publisher=Asian Development Bank | access-date=25 June 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706085143/http://development.asia/issue03/cover-03.asp |archive-date= 6 July 2011 }}</ref>


The head of the [[International Institute of Strategic Studies]], Tim Huxley, cites the diverse political systems present in the grouping, including many young states, as a barrier to far-reaching co-operation beyond economics. He also asserts that, without an external threat to rally against after the [[Cold War]] ended, ASEAN has less successfully restrained its members and resolved such border disputes as those between Myanmar and Thailand or Indonesia and Malaysia.<ref>{{cite news|last1= Huxley|first1=Tim|title=ASEAN's Mixed Bag|url=http://apac2020.thediplomat.com/feature/asean%E2%80%99s-mixed-bag/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120828143320/http://apac2020.thediplomat.com/feature/asean%E2%80%99s-mixed-bag/|archive-date=2012-08-28|access-date=11 February 2015|work=The Diplomat}}</ref> During the 12th ASEAN Summit in [[Metro Cebu|Cebu]], several activist groups staged [[anti-globalisation]] protests,<ref>{{cite news |title=About 100 militants stage protest vs Asean Summit in Cebu |url=http://www.gmanews.tv/video/3465/About-100-militants-stage-protest-vs-Asean-Summit-in-Cebu |website=[[GMANews.tv]] |access-date=6 March 2007 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053350/https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/video/24oras/3465/about-100-militants-stage-protest-vs-asean-summit-in-cebu/video/ |url-status=live }}</ref> arguing that the agenda of economic integration would negatively affect industries in the Philippines and would deprive thousands of Filipinos of their jobs.<ref name="KMU">{{cite news|url=http://www.kilusangmayouno.org/asean-protests-cebu-will-also-underscore-massive-opposition-charter-change |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071009121459/http://www.kilusangmayouno.org/asean-protests-cebu-will-also-underscore-massive-opposition-charter-change |archive-date=9 October 2007 |title=ASEAN protests in Cebu will also underscore massive opposition to Charter Change |publisher= Kilusang Mayo Uno |via= kilusangmayouno.org }}</ref>
The head of the [[International Institute of Strategic Studies]], Tim Huxley, cites the diverse political systems present in the grouping, including many young states, as a barrier to far-reaching co-operation beyond economics. He also asserts that, without an external threat to rally against after the [[Cold War]] ended, ASEAN has less successfully restrained its members and resolved such border disputes as those between Myanmar and Thailand or Indonesia and Malaysia.<ref>{{cite news|last1= Huxley|first1=Tim|title=ASEAN's Mixed Bag|url=http://apac2020.thediplomat.com/feature/asean%E2%80%99s-mixed-bag/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120828143320/http://apac2020.thediplomat.com/feature/asean%E2%80%99s-mixed-bag/|archive-date=2012-08-28|access-date=11 February 2015|work=The Diplomat|date=2010}}</ref> During the 12th ASEAN Summit in [[Metro Cebu|Cebu]], several activist groups staged [[anti-globalisation]] protests,<ref>{{cite news |title=About 100 militants stage protest vs Asean Summit in Cebu |url=http://www.gmanews.tv/video/3465/About-100-militants-stage-protest-vs-Asean-Summit-in-Cebu |website=[[GMANews.tv]] |date=13 January 2007 |access-date=6 March 2007 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053350/https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/video/24oras/3465/about-100-militants-stage-protest-vs-asean-summit-in-cebu/video/ |url-status=live }}</ref> arguing that the agenda of economic integration would negatively affect industries in the Philippines and would deprive thousands of Filipinos of their jobs.<ref name="KMU">{{cite news|url=http://www.kilusangmayouno.org/asean-protests-cebu-will-also-underscore-massive-opposition-charter-change |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071009121459/http://www.kilusangmayouno.org/asean-protests-cebu-will-also-underscore-massive-opposition-charter-change |archive-date=9 October 2007 |title=ASEAN protests in Cebu will also underscore massive opposition to Charter Change |publisher= Kilusang Mayo Uno |via= kilusangmayouno.org |url-status=usurped |date=7 December 2006 }}</ref>


Corruption remains a widespread issue, as "tea money" remains an important requirement to grease business transactions and to receive public services. Following the release of the ''[[Corruption Perceptions Index]] 2015'' by Berlin-based graft watchdog Transparency International on 27 January, its Asia Pacific director, Srirak Plipat, noted that: "if there was one common challenge to unite the Asia-Pacific region, it would be corruption", noting that: "from campaign pledges to media coverage to civil society forums, corruption dominates the discussion. Yet despite all this talk, there's little sign of action."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://investvine.com/corruption-still-widespread-in-southeast-asia/|title=Corruption still widespread in Southeast Asia|last=Maierbrugger|first=Arno|website=Investvine.com|access-date=3 March 2016|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053324/http://investvine.com/corruption-still-widespread-in-southeast-asia/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Corruption remains a widespread issue, as "tea money" remains an important requirement to grease business transactions and to receive public services. Following the release of the ''[[Corruption Perceptions Index]] 2015'' by Berlin-based graft watchdog Transparency International on 27 January, its Asia–Pacific director, Srirak Plipat, noted that: "if there was one common challenge to unite the Asia-Pacific region, it would be corruption", noting that: "from campaign pledges to media coverage to civil society forums, corruption dominates the discussion. Yet despite all this talk, there's little sign of action."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://investvine.com/corruption-still-widespread-in-southeast-asia/|title=Corruption still widespread in Southeast Asia|last=Maierbrugger|first=Arno|website=Investvine.com|access-date=3 March 2016|date=30 January 2016|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053324/http://investvine.com/corruption-still-widespread-in-southeast-asia/|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Economic integration===
===Economic integration===
The group's integration plan has raised concerns, in particular, the 2015 deadline. Business and economy experts who attended the Lippo-UPH Dialogue in [[Naypyidaw]] cited unresolved issues relating to aviation, agriculture, and human resources.<ref>{{cite news|last1=K.|first1=Reid|title=Southeast Asia is Not Ready for AEC|url=http://www.investasian.com/2015/01/27/southeast-asia-not-ready-aec/|access-date=10 February 2015|work=InvestAsian|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150207161612/http://www.investasian.com/2015/01/27/southeast-asia-not-ready-aec/|archive-date=7 February 2015}}</ref> Some panelists, among them, [[Kishore Mahbubani]], warned against high expectations at the onset. He stated: "Please do not expect a big bang event in 2015 where everything is going to happen overnight when the ASEAN Economic Community comes into being. We've made progress in some areas and unfortunately regressed in some areas."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/world/06/10/13/asean-people-unaware-2015-economic-integration |title=ASEAN people unaware of 2015 economic integration |work=ABS-CBNNews.com |agency=Reuters |access-date=1 December 2014 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053324/https://news.abs-cbn.com/global-filipino/world/06/10/13/asean-people-unaware-2015-economic-integration |url-status=live }}</ref>
The group's integration plan has raised concerns, in particular, the 2015 deadline. Business and economy experts who attended the Lippo-UPH Dialogue in [[Naypyidaw]] cited unresolved issues relating to aviation, agriculture, and human resources.<ref>{{cite news|last1=K.|first1=Reid|title=Southeast Asia is Not Ready for AEC|url=http://www.investasian.com/2015/01/27/southeast-asia-not-ready-aec/|access-date=10 February 2015|work=InvestAsian|date=27 January 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150207161612/http://www.investasian.com/2015/01/27/southeast-asia-not-ready-aec/|archive-date=7 February 2015}}</ref> Some panelists, among them, [[Kishore Mahbubani]], warned against high expectations at the onset. He stated: "Please do not expect a big bang event in 2015 where everything is going to happen overnight when the ASEAN Economic Community comes into being. We've made progress in some areas and unfortunately regressed in some areas."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/world/06/10/13/asean-people-unaware-2015-economic-integration |title=ASEAN people unaware of 2015 economic integration |work=ABS-CBNNews.com |via=Reuters |date=10 June 2013 |access-date=1 December 2014 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053324/https://news.abs-cbn.com/global-filipino/world/06/10/13/asean-people-unaware-2015-economic-integration |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
Some panelists enumerated other matters to be dealt with for a successful launch. Among them were the communications issues involving the 600 million citizens living in the region, increasing understanding in business, current visa arrangements, demand for specific skills, banking connections, and economic differences. Former Philippine [[Philippine Statistics Authority|National Statistical Coordination Board]] (NSCB) Secretary General Romulo A. Virola, said in 2012 that the Philippines seems unready to benefit from the integration due to its "wobbly" economic performance compared to other member states. According to Virola, the Philippines continues to lag behind in terms of employment rate, tourism, life expectancy, and cellular subscriptions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rappler.com/business/economy-watch/12203-ph-may-not-ready-to-benefit-from-asean-integration-expert|title=PH may not be ready for ASEAN integration – expert|work=Rappler.com|date=11 September 2012 |access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=19 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170619224002/http://www.rappler.com/business/economy-watch/12203-ph-may-not-ready-to-benefit-from-asean-integration-expert|url-status=live}}</ref> Nestor Tan, head of [[BDO Unibank|BDO Unibank Inc.]], said that while some businesses see the Asian Economic Blueprint (AEC) as an opportunity, the integration would be more of a threat to local firms. Tan added that protecting the Philippines' agricultural and financial services sectors, as well as the labour sector, would be necessary for the implementation of AEC by 2015.<ref name="PhilStar">{{cite news |url=http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/04/24/1315836/news-analysis-asean-economic-integration-2015-draws-conflicting-views |title=News Analysis: ASEAN economic integration in 2015 draws conflicting views in Phl |work=[[The Philippine Star]] |date=24 April 2014 |access-date=24 November 2014 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053409/https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/04/24/1315836/news-analysis-asean-economic-integration-2015-draws-conflicting-views-phl |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Standard & Poor's]] also believed that banks in the Philippines are not yet prepared for the tougher competition that would result from the integration. In one of its latest publications, S&P said banks in the country, although profitable and stable, operate on a much smaller scale than their counterparts in the region.<ref name="PhilStar" />
 
The [[US Chamber of Commerce]] has highlighted widespread concern that the much-anticipated AEC could not be launched by the 2015 deadline.<ref name="AmCham">{{cite book|last1=McNutt|first1=Thomas H|title=ASEAN Business Outlook Survey 2015|date=2014|publisher=US Chamber of Commerce|location=Singapore|page=56|url=https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/asean_business_outlook_survey_2015.pdf|access-date=10 February 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053352/https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/asean_business_outlook_survey_2015.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> In January 2014, former ASEAN Secretary-General [[Rodolfo Severino Jr.|Rodolfo C. Severino]], wrote: "while ASEAN should not be condemned for its members' failure to make good on their commitments, any failure to deliver will likely lead to a loss of credibility and could mean that member states fall further behind in the global competition for export markets and [[foreign direct investment]] (FDI)".<ref name="EAF-20140131">{{cite news|last1=Severino|first1=Rodolfo C|title=Let's be honest about what ASEAN can and cannot do|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/01/31/lets-be-honest-about-what-asean-can-and-cannot-do/|access-date=10 May 2015|work=East Asia Forum|date=31 January 2014|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053359/https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/01/31/lets-be-honest-about-what-asean-can-and-cannot-do/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2012, the commencement of the AEC was postponed to 31 December 2015 from the original plan of 1 January. Despite Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan's firm reassurance that "[t]here will be no more delays and that all ten ASEAN countries will participate", even the most fervent proponents of AEC worried that AEC would not be delivered on time as December 2015 neared.<ref name="Xianbai">{{cite news|last1=Xianbai|first1=Ji|title=Why the ASEAN Economic Community Will Struggle|url=https://thediplomat.com/2014/09/why-the-asean-economic-community-will-struggle/|access-date=12 May 2015|work=The Diplomat|date=24 September 2014|archive-date=9 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150509232716/https://thediplomat.com/2014/09/why-the-asean-economic-community-will-struggle/|url-status=live}}</ref>


Some panelists enumerated other matters to be dealt with for a successful launch. Among them were the communications issues involving the 600 million citizens living in the region, increasing understanding in business, current visa arrangements, demand for specific skills, banking connections, and economic differences. Former Philippine [[Philippine Statistics Authority|National Statistical Coordination Board]] (NSCB) Secretary General Romulo A. Virola, said in 2012 that the Philippines seems unready to benefit from the integration due to its "wobbly" economic performance compared to other member states. According to Virola, the Philippines continues to lag behind in terms of employment rate, tourism, life expectancy, and cellular subscriptions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rappler.com/business/economy-watch/12203-ph-may-not-ready-to-benefit-from-asean-integration-expert|title=PH may not be ready for ASEAN integration - expert|work=Rappler.com|access-date=14 June 2015|archive-date=19 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170619224002/http://www.rappler.com/business/economy-watch/12203-ph-may-not-ready-to-benefit-from-asean-integration-expert|url-status=live}}</ref> Nestor Tan, head of [[BDO Unibank|BDO Unibank Inc.]], said that while some businesses see the Asian Economic Blueprint (AEC) as an opportunity, the integration would be more of a threat to local firms. Tan added that protecting the Philippines' agricultural and financial services sectors, as well as the labour sector, would be necessary for the implementation of AEC by 2015.<ref name="PhilStar">{{cite news |url=http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/04/24/1315836/news-analysis-asean-economic-integration-2015-draws-conflicting-views |title=News Analysis: ASEAN economic integration in 2015 draws conflicting views in Phl |work=[[The Philippine Star]] |access-date=24 November 2014 |archive-date=30 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053409/https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/04/24/1315836/news-analysis-asean-economic-integration-2015-draws-conflicting-views-phl |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Standard & Poor's]] also believed that banks in the Philippines are not yet prepared for the tougher competition that would result from the integration. In one of its latest publications, S&P said banks in the country, although profitable and stable, operate on a much smaller scale than their counterparts in the region.<ref name=PhilStar />
An article published by ''[[Vietnam News]]'' echoed some of the challenges and opportunities that Vietnam faces in preparation for the AEC. The article said that the deputy head of the [[Ministry of Industry and Trade (Vietnam)|Ministry of Industry and Trade]], Tran Thanh Hai, was concerned about local enterprises' lack of knowledge of the AEC. It was said that 80% of local enterprises surveyed acknowledged that they have little information about the interests and challenges available for them in the ASEAN market. The article also noted that the general secretary of the Vietnam Steel Association, Chu Duc Khai, said that most of the local steel making enterprises lack information about doing business in the ASEAN market; they have not had a chance to study it, and have only exported small amounts of steel to ASEAN countries.<ref name="Movetoasia">{{cite web|url=https://movetoasia.com/en/vietnam/sourcing-manufacturing/|title=Import-Export Department|work=Movetoasia|access-date=10 July 2020|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053403/https://movetoasia.com/en/vietnam/sourcing-manufacturing/|url-status=live}}</ref> Another challenge is the need to compete with other countries in the ASEAN market to export raw products since the country had mainly exported raw products.<ref>{{cite news|title=New ASEAN community offers export opportunities|url=http://vietnamnews.vn/economy/253874/new-asean-community-offers-export-opportunities.html|access-date=12 May 2015|work=Vietnam News|date=19 April 2014|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053347/https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/253874/new-asean-community-offers-export-opportunities.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Asian Development Bank]] also has doubts about Cambodia's ability to meet the AEC deadline. The leading economist of ADB, Jayant Menon, said that Cambodia needs to speed up its customs reform and to press ahead with automating processes to reduce trade costs and minimise the opportunities for corruption and be ready for the implementation of its National Single Window by 2015.<ref name="Maierbrugger">{{cite news|last1=Maierbrugger|first1=Arno|title=Cambodia May Miss Date For ASEAN Economic Community|url=http://investvine.com/cambodia-may-miss-date-for-asean-economic-community/|access-date=12 May 2015|work=Investvine|date=1 October 2014|archive-date=4 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103518/http://investvine.com/cambodia-may-miss-date-for-asean-economic-community/|url-status=live}}</ref>


The [[US Chamber of Commerce]] has highlighted widespread concern that the much-anticipated AEC could not be launched by the 2015 deadline.<ref name="AmCham">{{cite book|last1=McNutt|first1=Thomas H|title=ASEAN Business Outlook Survey 2015|publisher=US Chamber of Commerce|location=Singapore|pages=56|url=https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/asean_business_outlook_survey_2015.pdf|access-date=10 February 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053352/https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/asean_business_outlook_survey_2015.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> In January 2014, former ASEAN Secretary-General Rodolfo C. Severino, wrote: "while ASEAN should not be condemned for its members' failure to make good on their commitments, any failure to deliver will likely lead to a loss of credibility and could mean that member states fall further behind in the global competition for export markets and [[foreign direct investment]] (FDI)".<ref name="EAF-20140131">{{cite news|last1=Severino|first1=Rodolfo C|title=Let's be honest about what ASEAN can and cannot do|url=http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/01/31/lets-be-honest-about-what-asean-can-and-cannot-do/|access-date=10 May 2015|work=East Asia Forum|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053359/https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/01/31/lets-be-honest-about-what-asean-can-and-cannot-do/|url-status=live}}</ref> This is not the first time that AEC faces a probable delay. In 2012, the commencement of the AEC was postponed to 31 December 2015 from the original plan of 1 January. Despite Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan's firm reassurance that "[t]here will be no more delays and that all ten ASEAN countries will participate", even the most fervent proponents of AEC worried that AEC would not be delivered on time as December 2015 neared.<ref name="Xianbai">{{cite news|last1=Xianbai|first1=Ji|title=Why the ASEAN Economic Community Will Struggle|url=https://thediplomat.com/2014/09/why-the-asean-economic-community-will-struggle/|access-date=12 May 2015|work=The Diplomat|archive-date=9 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150509232716/https://thediplomat.com/2014/09/why-the-asean-economic-community-will-struggle/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Despite an ASEAN Economic Community goal of significant economic integration as laid out in the AEC Blueprint 2025, ASEAN continues to face challenges towards integration.<ref>"[https://www.asean.org/storage/2016/03/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf AEC Blueprint 2025] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053407/https://www.asean.org/storage/2016/03/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf |date=30 September 2020 }}," ''The ASEAN Secretariat,'' November 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2019.</ref> A report published by the Asian Trade Centre in 2019 identified multiple sectors that face challenges towards integration due to non-tariff barriers that still exist in the region. The report stated that the goals of the AEC 2025 would not be accomplished if ASEAN fails to address the issues of non-tariff measures and eliminate non-tariff barriers in the region.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.asiantradecentre.org/talkingtrade/tackling-non-tariff-barriers-in-asean|title=Tackling Non-Tariff Barriers in ASEAN|website=Asian Trade Centre|date=25 June 2019|access-date=2019-06-25|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053329/http://asiantradecentre.org/talkingtrade/tackling-non-tariff-barriers-in-asean|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>"[https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/63371b_6d469e4b28ec472c8da54c1d86f7edc9.pdf Non-tariff barriers in ASEAN and their elimination from a business perspective] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053329/https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/63371b_6d469e4b28ec472c8da54c1d86f7edc9.pdf |date=30 September 2020 }}," ''The Asian Trade Centre'', 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2019.</ref>


An article published by ''[[Vietnam News]]'' echoed some of the challenges and opportunities that Vietnam faces in preparation for the AEC. The article said that the deputy head of the [[Ministry of Industry and Trade (Vietnam)|Ministry of Industry and Trade]], Tran Thanh Hai, was concerned about local enterprises' lack of knowledge of the AEC. It was said that 80% of local enterprises surveyed acknowledged that they have little information about the interests and challenges available for them in the ASEAN market. The article also noted that the general secretary of the Vietnam Steel Association, Chu Duc Khai, said that most of the local steel making enterprises lack information about doing business in the ASEAN market; they have not had a chance to study it, and have only exported small amounts of steel to ASEAN countries.<ref name="Movetoasia">{{cite web|url=https://movetoasia.com/en/vietnam/sourcing-manufacturing/|title=Import-Export Department|work=Movetoasia|access-date=10 July 2020|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053403/https://movetoasia.com/en/vietnam/sourcing-manufacturing/|url-status=live}}</ref> Another challenge is the need to compete with other countries in the ASEAN market to export raw products since the country had mainly exported raw products.<ref>{{cite news|title=New ASEAN community offers export opportunities|url=http://vietnamnews.vn/economy/253874/new-asean-community-offers-export-opportunities.html|access-date=12 May 2015|work=Vietnam News|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053347/https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/253874/new-asean-community-offers-export-opportunities.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Asian Development Bank]] also has doubts about Cambodia's ability to meet the AEC deadline. The leading economist of ADB, Jayant Menon, said that Cambodia needs to speed up its customs reform and to press ahead with automating processes to reduce trade costs and minimise the opportunities for corruption and be ready for the implementation of its National Single Window by 2015.<ref name="Maierbrugger">{{cite news|last1=Maierbrugger|first1=Arno|title=Cambodia May Miss Date For ASEAN Economic Community|url=http://investvine.com/cambodia-may-miss-date-for-asean-economic-community/|access-date=12 May 2015|work=Investvine|archive-date=4 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103518/http://investvine.com/cambodia-may-miss-date-for-asean-economic-community/|url-status=live}}</ref>
==Security==
[[File:ASEAN-India Maritime Exercise 2023 completed their Sea Phase on 8 May 2023.jpg|thumb|Greeting between two naval fleets in the [[South China Sea]] during the ASEAN-India Maritime Exercise, 8 May 2023]]
ASEAN is recognised by its members to be one of the main forums to discuss security issues; based on the principles in its [[ASEAN Charter|charter]], its main aim is to provide an environment of common understanding and cooperation between the member states to "respond effectively to all forms of threats, transitional crimes and transboundary challenges".<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|date=2008|title=The ASEAN Charter|url=https://asean.org/storage/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf|access-date=30 May 2021|archive-date=28 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191228203249/https://asean.org/storage/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf}}</ref> Accordingly, ASEAN has embraced the idea of cooperative security<ref>{{Cite book|last=Nasu|first=Hitoshi|title=The legal authority of ASEAN as a security institution|date=2019|others=Rob McLaughlin, Donald Rothwell, See Seng Tan|isbn=978-1-108-66951-1|location=Cambridge, United Kingdom|oclc=1100418969}}</ref> which means that ASEAN's approach to security issues is through confidence-building measures and transparency for reducing the tension and conflict between its members. Security policies and plans are concerted by the ASEAN Political-Security Community to envision "a concert of Southeast Asian nations, outward looking, living in peace, stability and prosperity, bonded together in partnership in dynamic development and in a community of caring societies."<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|date=2009|title=ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint|url=https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/5187-18.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160327183749/https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/5187-18.pdf|archive-date=27 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>


Despite an ASEAN Economic Community goal of significant economic integration as laid out in the AEC Blueprint 2025, ASEAN continues to face challenges towards integration.<ref>"[https://www.asean.org/storage/2016/03/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf AEC Blueprint 2025] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053407/https://www.asean.org/storage/2016/03/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf }}," ''The ASEAN Secretariat,'' November 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2019.</ref> A report published by the Asian Trade Centre in 2019 identified multiple sectors that face challenges towards integration due to non-tariff barriers that still exist in the region. The report stated that the goals of the AEC 2025 would not be accomplished if ASEAN fails to address the issues of non-tariff measures and eliminate non-tariff barriers in the region.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.asiantradecentre.org/talkingtrade/tackling-non-tariff-barriers-in-asean|title=Tackling Non-Tariff Barriers in ASEAN|website=Asian Trade Centre|language=en-US|access-date=2019-06-25|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053329/http://asiantradecentre.org/talkingtrade/tackling-non-tariff-barriers-in-asean|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>"[https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/63371b_6d469e4b28ec472c8da54c1d86f7edc9.pdf Non-tariff barriers in ASEAN and their elimination from a business perspective] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053329/https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/63371b_6d469e4b28ec472c8da54c1d86f7edc9.pdf }}," ''The Asian Trade Centre'', 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2019.</ref>
===Piracy===
[[Piracy in the Strait of Malacca|Piracy in the strait of Malacca]] and in the Sulu and Celebes Sea is one of the main non-traditional security threats for the region, it has challenged the capacity of its members to ensure coordination of effective policy actions to reduce this phenomenon. As highlighted by the [[ReCAAP]] report of 2020: "The increase of incidents (in Asia) during January–June 2020 occurred in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, South China Sea and Singapore Strait."<ref>{{Cite web|last=ReCAAP|date=2020|title=ReCAAP ISC Half Yearly Report 2020|url=https://www.recaap.org/resources/ck/files/reports/half-year/ReCAAP%20ISC%20Half%20Yearly%20Report%202020.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200717105841/https://www.recaap.org/resources/ck/files/reports/half-year/ReCAAP%20ISC%20Half%20Yearly%20Report%202020.pdf|archive-date=17 July 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> The increment of incidents during 2020, have raised alerts in the region as the phenomenon of piracy could be fostered by the social consequences of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], in their Fourteenth Asean Ministerial Meeting On Transnational Crime<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|date=2020|title=JOINT STATEMENT FOURTEENTH ASEAN MINISTERIAL MEETING ON TRANSNATIONAL CRIME (14th AMMTC)Cohesive and Responsive ASEAN against Transnational Crime|url=https://asean.org/storage/ADOPTED-JOINT-STATEMENT-14TH-AMMTC.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224195106/https://asean.org/storage/ADOPTED-JOINT-STATEMENT-14TH-AMMTC.pdf|archive-date=24 February 2021}}</ref> the ministers agreed that ASEAN should embrace a greater commitment to strengthen the measures in combating transnational crime in the context of the pandemic. Despite this statement, ASEAN has not updated their plans for combating piracy, although member states created and enforced the [[Maritime Security Plan of Action 2018-2020]], to address the national legal enforcement capacities and creating a common protocol of action to counter piracy allowing the region to cooperate for ensuring the security of the Pacific Ocean, new discussions and agendas for new measures has not been enforced yet.


===Territorial disputes===
Accordingly, this plan reinforces the necessity to secure the seas due to the importance of this region geographical and economically, its strategic position as the main link between the Indian and the Pacific Ocean and the region serving as the main passage that connects middle east economies and India with China, Japan, South Korea and Australia. This plan is mainly focused in three priorities:<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|title=ASEAN Regional Forum Work Plan For Maritime Security 2018–2020|url=https://aseanregionalforum.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ARF-Maritime-Security-Work-Plan-2018-2020.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200524183935/https://aseanregionalforum.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ARF-Maritime-Security-Work-Plan-2018-2020.pdf|archive-date=24 May 2020|url-status=live}}</ref>
Several [[territorial dispute]]s have affected the unity of ASEAN such as the [[Cambodian–Thai border dispute]] between Cambodia and Thailand, [[Cambodia–Vietnam relations#recent events|Cambodian–Vietnamese border dispute]] between Cambodia and Vietnam,<ref>{{cite web| url=https://theaseanpost.com/article/lesser-known-border-tensions-between-cambodia-and-vietnam-0| title=Lesser known border tensions between Cambodia and Vietnam| work=theaseanpost.com| date=9 April 2018| access-date=5 February 2020| archive-date=4 February 2020| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200204234627/https://theaseanpost.com/article/lesser-known-border-tensions-between-cambodia-and-vietnam-0| url-status=live}}</ref> the [[North Borneo dispute]] between the Philippines and Malaysia,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/02/27/1557213/binay-pursue-territorial-claim-sabah-if-elected|title=Binay to pursue territorial claim to Sabah if elected| first1= Helen | last1= Flores| first2= Alexis | last2= Romero| work=The Philippine Star|access-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325101019/http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/02/27/1557213/binay-pursue-territorial-claim-sabah-if-elected|archive-date= 25 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2479&dat=20000402&id=P1M1AAAAIBAJ&pg=2032,892348&hl=en|title=Marcos order: Destabilize, take Sabah|newspaper=Philippine Daily Inquirer|access-date=19 June 2015|archive-date=30 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053330/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2479&dat=20000402&id=P1M1AAAAIBAJ&pg=2032%2C892348&hl=en|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/citing-militant-threats-on-sabah-bn-mp-tells-putrajaya-to-cut-diplomatic-ti|title=Citing militant threats on Sabah, BN MP tells Putrajaya to cut diplomatic ties to Manila|author= Yiswaree Palansamy|newspaper=The Malay Mail|access-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325100426/http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/citing-militant-threats-on-sabah-bn-mp-tells-putrajaya-to-cut-diplomatic-ti|archive-date=25 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-asks-philippines/2565596.html|title=Malaysia asks Philippines not to threaten ties over Sabah claim| first= Sumisha | last= Naidu|publisher=Channel NewsAsia|access-date=25 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325095839/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-asks-philippines/2565596.html|archive-date=25 March 2016}}</ref> and the [[South China Sea dispute]] which includes Vietnam, Brunei, the Philippines, Malaysia, and possibly Indonesia.<ref>{{Cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/10/world/asia/indonesia-south-china-sea-military-buildup.html| title=Indonesia, Long on Sidelines, Starts to Confront China's Territorial Claims| newspaper=The New York Times| date=10 September 2017| last1=Cochrane| first1=Joe| access-date=20 October 2018| archive-date=30 September 2020| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930053331/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/10/world/asia/indonesia-south-china-sea-military-buildup.html| url-status=live}}</ref>
 
# Shared Awareness and exchange of best practices.
# Confidence building measures based on international and regional legal frameworks, arrangements and cooperation.
# Capacity building and enhancing cooperation of maritime law enforcement agencies in the region.


The [[Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia]] in 1978, backed by the Soviet Union, was not accepted by ASEAN. They rejected it as a violation of the principles of regional integration. ASEAN cooperated with US and Australia to oppose Vietnam's move and it sponsored a Cambodian resolution in the United Nations General Assembly. ASEAN played a major role starting in 1980 in the peace process, leading to the 1991 Paris Agreement.
In this sense, spread all over the countries of Southeast Asia, criminal organisations with complex structures pose a challenge to ASEAN's coordination capacity to solve the problem despite the plans created within its institutional framework. Although some measures have been implemented by ASEAN,<ref name="Haward2014">{{Cite journal|last=Haward|first=Marcus|date=2014-07-03|title=Editorial|journal=Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs|volume=6|issue=3|pages=117–118|doi=10.1080/18366503.2014.954300|s2cid=220296737|issn=1836-6503}}</ref> still the complexity of the problem requires deep solutions of cooperation that might alter the balance of its framework. The maritime security plans for the region are based on the ASEAN idea of political-security community; the two main objectives of the APSC are: "to accelerate the economic growth, social progress and cultural development by promoting an identity of equality and partnership as the main foundations of peace and prosperity".<ref name="Haward2014" /> Additionally, the APSC promotes "regional peace and stability through abiding respect for justice and the rule of law in the relationship among countries of the region and adherence to the principles of the United Nations Charter".<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Putra|first1=Bama|last2=Darwis|first2=Darwis|last3=Burhanuddin|first3=Burhanuddin|date=March 2019|title=ASEAN Political-Security Community: Challenges of establishing regional security in the Southeast Asia|url=https://www.jois.eu/?488,en_asean-political-security-community-challenges-of-establishing-regional-security-in-the-southeast-asia|journal=Journal of International Studies|volume=12|issue=1|pages=33–49|doi=10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-1/2|issn=2071-8330|doi-access=free}}</ref>


== Security ==
Nonetheless, the institutional framework and decision-making procedures in ASEAN make difficult to reach agreements on piracy. ASEAN has struggled to deliver a coordinated response to solve this problem in the region mainly by two reasons: the first one, could be related to the focalised nature of the problem in subregions rather than the whole region. Consequently, this focalisation generates that the discussions in the main forums (The ASEAN maritime forum (AMF) and Maritime Security Expert Working Group (MSEWG)) have not resulted in actual measures that tackle piracy and involve all member states as major consensus should be reached to enforce them. One example of this, is the possibility discussed by the 10 ASEAN member states to create a joint ASEAN navy in 2015 to carry on operations in one of the piracy hotspots in the region,<ref>{{Cite news|last=Southgate|first=Laura|date=2015|title=Piracy in the Malacca Strait: Can ASEAN Respond?|work=The Diplomat|url=https://thediplomat.com/2015/07/piracy-in-the-malacca-strait-can-asean-respond/}}</ref> the strait of Malacca, this proposal ended up being enforced by bilateral/sub-regional efforts rather than in the ASEAN framework (see [[ReCAAP]] for further information).<ref>{{Cite book|title=Piracy, maritime terrorism and securing the Malacca Straits|date=2006|publisher=Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|editor=Graham Gerard Ong |isbn=981-230-391-X|location=Singapore|oclc=77502405}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bhattacharyya|first=Anushree|date=December 2010|title=Understanding Security in Regionalism Framework: ASEAN Maritime Security in Perspective|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09733159.2010.559786|journal=Maritime Affairs:Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India|volume=6|issue=2|pages=72–89|doi=10.1080/09733159.2010.559786|s2cid=109034519|issn=0973-3159|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Haacke|first=Jürgen|date=September 2009|title=The ASEAN Regional Forum: from dialogue to practical security cooperation?|journal=Cambridge Review of International Affairs|volume=22|issue=3|pages=427–449|doi=10.1080/09557570903104057|s2cid=144870373|issn=0955-7571|doi-access=free}}</ref> &nbsp;The second one, consensus on non-traditional security issues has been difficult to reach due to contradictory interest between member states, particularly in joint operations between navies and the reach of these joint operations. These issues are generated mainly by unresolved territorial disputes, specially in the maritime domain, at some extent they pose a challenge to ASEAN members in their capacity to cooperate in regards to the [[maritime security]] approach.<ref name="Andrew2017">{{cite journal|last=Andrew|first=Ivan Mario|date=2017|title=Developing Defence Cooperation in Maintaining ASEAN's Resilience in Managing Conflict and Unconventional Threat|journal=The Journal of Defence and Security|volume=8|pages=14–27 }}</ref>
ASEAN is recognized by its members to be one of the main forums to discuss security issues; based on the principles in its [[ASEAN Charter|charter]], its main aim is to provide an environment of common understanding and cooperation between the member states to "respond effectively to all forms of threats, transitional crimes and transboundary challenges".<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|title=The ASEAN Charter|url=https://asean.org/storage/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf|access-date=30 May 2021|archive-date=28 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191228203249/https://asean.org/storage/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf}}</ref> Accordingly, ASEAN has embraced the idea of cooperative security<ref>{{Cite book|last=Nasu|first=Hitoshi|title=The legal authority of ASEAN as a security institution|others=Rob McLaughlin, Donald Rothwell, See Seng Tan|isbn=978-1-108-66951-1|location=Cambridge, United Kingdom|oclc=1100418969}}</ref> which means that ASEAN's approach to security issues is through confidence-building measures and transparency for reducing the tension and conflict between its members. Security policies and plans are concerted by the ASEAN Political-Security Community to envision "a concert of Southeast Asian nations, outward looking, living in peace, stability and prosperity, bonded together in partnership in dynamic development and in a community of caring societies."<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|title=ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint|url=https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/5187-18.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160327183749/https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/5187-18.pdf|archive-date=27 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>


=== Piracy ===
Consequently, a greater multilateral cooperation has been pushed by the members to solve the piracy challenges on economy, trading and security. Members of the ASEAN, have addressed the necessity for the regional organisation to make some concessions and rearrangements to respond to the challenges that non-traditional security (specifically piracy) issues posse to the security of the ASEAN members. Despite the efforts and plans made by the ASEAN, this organisation is expected to overcome the image of being regarded solely as a forum to discuss security issues. Two possible solutions has been proposed by some member states for this purpose: 1. Promoting relationships with other major actors regionally to overcome the short-time challenges and 2. Rearrange the institutional framework to "avoid contention and seek cooperation to maximize the aggregate ability in order to benefit from making the sea fulfil its economic, security and other goals".<ref name="Andrew2017" />
[[Piracy in the Strait of Malacca|Piracy in the strait of Malacca]] and in the Sulu and Celebes Sea is one of the main non-traditional security threats for the region, it has challenged the capacity of its members to ensure coordination of effective policy actions to reduce this phenomenon. As highlighted by the [[ReCAAP]] report of 2020: "The increase of incidents (in Asia) during January–June 2020 occurred in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, South China Sea and Singapore Strait."<ref>{{Cite web|last=ReCAAP|title=ReCAAP ISC Half Yearly Report 2020|url=https://www.recaap.org/resources/ck/files/reports/half-year/ReCAAP%20ISC%20Half%20Yearly%20Report%202020.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200717105841/https://www.recaap.org/resources/ck/files/reports/half-year/ReCAAP%20ISC%20Half%20Yearly%20Report%202020.pdf|archive-date=17 July 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> The increment of incidents during 2020, have raised alerts in the region as the phenomenon of piracy could be fostered by the social consequences of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], in their Fourteenth Asean Ministerial Meeting On Transnational Crime<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|title=JOINT STATEMENT FOURTEENTH ASEAN MINISTERIAL MEETING ON TRANSNATIONAL CRIME (14th AMMTC)Cohesive and Responsive ASEAN against Transnational Crime|url=https://asean.org/storage/ADOPTED-JOINT-STATEMENT-14TH-AMMTC.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224195106/https://asean.org/storage/ADOPTED-JOINT-STATEMENT-14TH-AMMTC.pdf|archive-date=24 February 2021|url-status=dead}}</ref> the ministers agreed that ASEAN should embrace a greater commitment to strengthen the measures in combating transnational crime in the context of the pandemic. Despite this statement, ASEAN has not updated their plans for combating piracy, although member states created and enforced the [[Maritime Security Plan of Action 2018-2020]], to address the national legal enforcement capacities and creating a common protocol of action to counter piracy allowing the region to cooperate for ensuring the security of the Pacific Ocean, new discussions and agendas for new measures has not been enforced yet.


Accordingly, this plan reinforces the necessity to secure the seas due to the importance of this region geographical and economically, its strategic position as the main link between the Indian and the Pacific Ocean and the region serving as the main passage that connects middle east economies and India with China, Japan, South Korea and Australia. This plan is mainly focused in three priorities:<ref>{{Cite web|last=ASEAN|title=ASEAN Regional Forum Work Plan For Maritime Security 2018-2020|url=https://aseanregionalforum.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ARF-Maritime-Security-Work-Plan-2018-2020.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200524183935/https://aseanregionalforum.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ARF-Maritime-Security-Work-Plan-2018-2020.pdf|archive-date=24 May 2020|url-status=live}}</ref>
=== Future Security Framework ===
In addition to piracy, there are several significant issues facing ASEAN today, including human rights violations, repression, and democratic backsliding. Across the region, various political leaders are known human rights abusers, however there is no proper accountability process, and often human rights violations are sidelined by economic or political interests.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Pearson |first=Elaine |date=March 4, 2024 |title="On Human Rights, ASEAN Is Woefully Inadequate and Impotent" |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/05/human-rights-asean-woefully-inadequate-and-impotent |access-date=April 24, 2024 |work=Human Rights Watch}}</ref> Myanmar is in the midst of a devastating civil war, during which the military government that was installed following a coup d'état, has carried out human rights violations against the Rohingya population.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kurlantzick |first=Joshua |date=August 29, 2022 |title="ASEAN's Complete Failure on Myanmar: A Short Overview" |url=https://www.cfr.org/blog/aseans-complete-failure-myanmar-short-overview |access-date=April 28, 2024 |work=Council on Foreign Relations}}</ref>


# Shared Awareness and exchange of best practices.
=== Regional Concerns About Thailand ===
# Confidence building measures based on international and regional legal frameworks, arrangements and cooperation.
Political instability in Thailand, particularly due to recurring military involvement in government, has raised concerns within ASEAN about regional stability. Since the 2006 coup, Thailand has experienced multiple military interventions in politics, including the 2014 coup led by General Prayuth Chan-ocha, which resulted in nearly a decade of military-backed governance.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Thailand: Military coups and political instability |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-27671037 |website=BBC News |date=23 May 2014 |access-date=28 July 2025}}</ref>
# Capacity building and enhancing cooperation of maritime law enforcement agencies in the region.


In this sense, spread all over the countries of Southeast Asia, criminal organizations with complex structures pose a challenge to ASEAN's coordination capacity to solve the problem despite the plans created within its institutional framework. Although some measures have been implemented by ASEAN,<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Haward|first=Marcus|title=Editorial|journal=Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs|volume=6|issue=3|pages=117–118|doi=10.1080/18366503.2014.954300|s2cid=220296737|issn=1836-6503}}</ref> still the complexity of the problem requires deep solutions of cooperation that might alter the balance of its framework. The maritime security plans for the region are based on the ASEAN idea of political-security community; the two main objectives of the APSC are: "to accelerate the economic growth, social progress and cultural development by promoting an identity of equality and partnership as the main foundations of peace and prosperity".<ref name=":0" /> Additionally, the APSC promotes "regional peace and stability through abiding respect for justice and the rule of law in the relationship among countries of the region and adherence to the principles of the United Nations Charter".<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Putra|first1=Bama|last2=Darwis|first2=Darwis|last3=Burhanuddin|first3=Burhanuddin|title=ASEAN Political-Security Community: Challenges of establishing regional security in the Southeast Asia|url=https://www.jois.eu/?488,en_asean-political-security-community-challenges-of-establishing-regional-security-in-the-southeast-asia|journal=Journal of International Studies|volume=12|issue=1|pages=33–49|doi=10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-1/2|issn=2071-8330|doi-access=free}}</ref> &nbsp;
Observers note that Thailand's military dominance has complicated ASEAN's ability to respond cohesively to regional challenges. Domestic instability has at times influenced its foreign policy stance, affecting negotiations on security cooperation and regional humanitarian crises.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Chachavalpongpun |first=Pavin |date=2022 |title=Thailand's Military and ASEAN's Security Dilemma |journal=Asian Survey |volume=62 |issue=4 |pages=601–623 |doi=10.1525/as.2022.62.4.601 |doi-broken-date=27 October 2025 }}</ref>


Nonetheless, the institutional framework and decision-making procedures in ASEAN make difficult to reach agreements on piracy. ASEAN has struggled to deliver a coordinated response to solve this problem in the region mainly by two reasons: the first one, could be related to the focalized nature of the problem in subregions rather than the whole region. Consequently, this focalization generates that the discussions in the main forums (The ASEAN maritime forum (AMF) and Maritime Security Expert Working Group (MSEWG)) have not resulted in actual measures that tackle piracy and involve all member states as major consensus should be reached to enforce them. One example of this, is the possibility discussed by the 10 ASEAN member states to create a joint ASEAN navy in 2015 to carry on operations in one of the piracy hotspots in the region,<ref>{{Cite news|last=Southgate|first=Laura|title=Piracy in the Malacca Strait: Can ASEAN Respond?|work=The Diplomat|url=https://thediplomat.com/2015/07/piracy-in-the-malacca-strait-can-asean-respond/}}</ref> the strait of Malacca, this proposal ended up being enforced by bilateral/sub-regional efforts rather than in the ASEAN framework (see [[ReCAAP]] for further information).<ref>{{Cite book|title=Piracy, maritime terrorism and securing the Malacca Straits|publisher=Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|editor=Graham Gerard Ong |isbn=981-230-391-X|location=Singapore|oclc=77502405}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bhattacharyya|first=Anushree|title=Understanding Security in Regionalism Framework: ASEAN Maritime Security in Perspective|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09733159.2010.559786|journal=Maritime Affairs:Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India|language=en|volume=6|issue=2|pages=72–89|doi=10.1080/09733159.2010.559786|s2cid=109034519|issn=0973-3159}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Haacke|first=Jürgen|title=The ASEAN Regional Forum: from dialogue to practical security cooperation?|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557570903104057|journal=Cambridge Review of International Affairs|language=en|volume=22|issue=3|pages=427–449|doi=10.1080/09557570903104057|s2cid=144870373|issn=0955-7571}}</ref> &nbsp;The second one, consensus on non-traditional security issues has been difficult to reach due to contradictory interest between member states, particularly in joint operations between navies and the reach of these joint operations. These issues are generated mainly by unresolved territorial disputes, specially in the maritime domain, at some extent they pose a challenge to ASEAN members in their capacity to cooperate in regards to the [[maritime security]] approach.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Andrew|first=Ivan Mario|title=Developing Defence Cooperation in Maintaining ASEAN's Resilience in Managing Conflict and Unconventional Threat|journal=The Journal of Defence and Security|volume=8|pages=14–27|via=ProQuest Central}}</ref> &nbsp;
=== AMNEX ===


Consequently, a greater multilateral cooperation has been pushed by the members to solve the piracy challenges on economy, trading and security. Members of the ASEAN, have addressed the necessity for the regional organization to make some concessions and rearrangements to respond to the challenges that non-traditional security (specifically piracy) issues posse to the security of the ASEAN members. Despite the efforts and plans made by the ASEAN, this organization is expected to overcome the image of being regarded solely as a forum to discuss security issues. Two possible solutions has been proposed by some member states for this purpose: 1. Promoting relationships with other major actors regionally to overcome the short-time challenges and 2. Rearrange the institutional framework to "avoid contention and seek cooperation to maximize the aggregate ability in order to benefit from making the sea fulfil its economic, security and other goals".<ref name=":1" />
The navies of ASEAN member countries participate in the different editions of the [[ASEAN Multilateral Naval Exercise]], or AMNEX.


==See also==
==See also==
 
{{Portal|Geography|<!--Eurasia-->|Asia|<!--ASEAN-->|Cambodia|Indonesia|Laos|Malaysia|Myanmar|Philippines|Singapore|Thailand|Timor-Leste|Vietnam}}
{{Div col}}
{{Div col}}
* [[ASEAN Smart Cities Network]]
* [[ASEAN Smart Cities Network]]
*[[ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women]]
* [[ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women]]
* [[ASEAN Common Time]]
* [[ASEAN Common Time]]
* [[ASEAN-India Car Rally 2012]]
* [[ASEAN-India Car Rally 2012]]
* [[ASEAN Sculpture Garden]]
* [[ASEAN Sculpture Garden]]
* [[ASEAN Power Grid]]
* [[Secondary language of ASEAN]]
* [[Asian Monetary Unit]]
* [[Asian Monetary Unit]]
* [[Asia Pacific Forum]]
* [[Asia Pacific Forum]]
* [[International Motor Insurance Card System#Blue card system|Blue card system]] – ASEAN motor insurance scheme
* [[International Motor Insurance Card System#Blue card system|Blue card system]] – ASEAN motor insurance scheme
* [[Comprehensive Economic Partnership for East Asia]]
* [[Comprehensive Economic Partnership for East Asia]]
* [[List of ASEAN countries by GDP (nominal)]]
* [[Congress of Southeast Asian Librarians]]
* [[List of ASEAN countries by GDP]]
* [[List of country groupings]]
* [[List of country groupings]]
* [[List of the largest trading partners of the ASEAN]]
* [[List of largest trading partners of ASEAN]]
* [[List of multilateral free-trade agreements]]
* [[List of multilateral free-trade agreements]]
* [[Mekong-Ganga Cooperation]]
* [[Mekong-Ganga Cooperation]]
Line 615: Line 836:
* [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership]]
* [[Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership]]
* [[Southeast Asia Treaty Organisation]]
* [[Southeast Asia Treaty Organisation]]
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}
{{clear}}
{{clear}}


==Notes==
==Notes==
{{notelist
{{notelist}}
| notes =
{{efn
| name = adress
| Address: Jalan Sisingamangaraja No.70A, [[Kebayoran Baru]], [[South Jakarta]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=ASEAN Centres & Facilities |url=http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-centres-facilities |website=ASEAN |publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations |access-date=16 September 2015 |archive-date=6 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906100841/http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-centres-facilities |url-status=live }}</ref>
}}
}}


==References==
==References==
Line 633: Line 847:
==Further reading==
==Further reading==
{{Library resources box}}
{{Library resources box}}
* {{cite book |author=Asian Development Bank Institute |title=ASEAN 2030: Toward a Borderless Economic Community |publisher=Brookings Institution Press |isbn=9784899740520 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dF0JDAAAQBAJ}}
* {{cite book |author=Asian Development Bank Institute |title=ASEAN 2030: Toward a Borderless Economic Community |date=8 March 2016 |publisher=Brookings Institution Press |isbn=978-4-89974-052-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dF0JDAAAQBAJ}}
* Taiwan ASEAN Studies Center; ASEAN Outlook Magazine; May 2013. [http://www.oilseedcrops.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ASEAN-Outlook-Magazine-June-2013-David-DuByne-Myanmars-Overlooked-Industry-Opportunities-and-Investment-Climate-.pdf Myanmar's Overlooked Industry Opportunities and Investment Climate], {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130828224807/http://www.oilseedcrops.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ASEAN-Outlook-Magazine-June-2013-David-DuByne-Myanmars-Overlooked-Industry-Opportunities-and-Investment-Climate-.pdf }}, by David DuByne
* Taiwan ASEAN Studies Center; ASEAN Outlook Magazine; May 2013. [http://www.oilseedcrops.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ASEAN-Outlook-Magazine-June-2013-David-DuByne-Myanmars-Overlooked-Industry-Opportunities-and-Investment-Climate-.pdf Myanmar's Overlooked Industry Opportunities and Investment Climate], {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130828224807/http://www.oilseedcrops.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ASEAN-Outlook-Magazine-June-2013-David-DuByne-Myanmars-Overlooked-Industry-Opportunities-and-Investment-Climate-.pdf |date=28 August 2013 }}, by David DuByne
* {{Citation |title=ASEAN Community in Figures (ACIF) 2012 |publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations |place=Jakarta |year=2012 |isbn=978-602-7643-22-2 |url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/resources/publication/2013_ACIF_2012%20Mar.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/resources/publication/2013_ACIF_2012%20Mar.pdf |archive-date=4 September 2015 }}
* {{Citation |title=ASEAN Community in Figures (ACIF) 2012 |publisher=Association of Southeast Asian Nations |place=Jakarta |year=2012 |isbn=978-602-7643-22-2 |url=http://www.asean.org/images/2013/resources/publication/2013_ACIF_2012%20Mar.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904103519/http://www.asean.org/images/2013/resources/publication/2013_ACIF_2012%20Mar.pdf |archive-date=4 September 2015 }}
* {{Citation |first=Amitav |last=Acharya |author-link=Amitav Acharya |title=Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order |edition=2nd |publisher=Routledge |place=Abingdon, Oxfordshire/New York |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-415-41428-9|ref=none}}
* {{Citation |first=Amitav |last=Acharya |author-link=Amitav Acharya |title=Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order |edition=2nd |publisher=Routledge |place=Abingdon, Oxfordshire/New York |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-415-41428-9|ref=none}}
Line 645: Line 859:
* Amador III J, Teodoro J. (2014), [http://www.rappler.com/world/specials/southeast-asia/asean-journey/47239-asean-community-2015-overview A united region: The ASEAN Community 2015]
* Amador III J, Teodoro J. (2014), [http://www.rappler.com/world/specials/southeast-asia/asean-journey/47239-asean-community-2015-overview A united region: The ASEAN Community 2015]


==External links==
== External links ==
{{Commons category}}


'''Organisations'''
'''Organisations'''
Line 664: Line 879:
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090807003731/http://www.act.or.th/asean_architect/index.html ASEAN Architect] (archived 7 August 2009)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090807003731/http://www.act.or.th/asean_architect/index.html ASEAN Architect] (archived 7 August 2009)
* [http://www.aseanlawassociation.org/ ASEAN Law Association]
* [http://www.aseanlawassociation.org/ ASEAN Law Association]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130127084240/http://www.aseanports.com/ ASEAN Ports Association] (archived 27January 2013)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130127084240/http://www.aseanports.com/ ASEAN Ports Association] (archived 27 January 2013)
* [http://www.us-asean.org/ US-ASEAN Business Council]
* [http://www.us-asean.org/ US-ASEAN Business Council]
* [http://www.asean-cn.org/ ASEAN-China Free Trade Area]
* [http://www.asean-cn.org/ ASEAN-China Free Trade Area] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726105047/http://www.asean-cn.org/ |date=26 July 2020 }}


'''ASEAN related websites'''
'''ASEAN related websites'''
* [http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community ASEAN Economic Community]
* [http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community ASEAN Economic Community]
* [https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/regional/asean/ Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN); U.S. State Department]
* [https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/regional/asean/ Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN); U.S. State Department]
* [https://aseanstory.com/ ASEAN Story]
* [https://aseanstory.com/ ASEAN Story]{{Dead link|date=February 2026 |bot=InternetArchiveBot }}


{{Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)}}
{{Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)}}
{{Eastern world}}
{{Regional organizations}}
{{Regional organizations}}
{{Navboxes
{{Navboxes
Line 690: Line 906:
{{International power |collapsed}}
{{International power |collapsed}}
}}
}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:ASEAN}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:ASEAN}}

Latest revision as of 11:15, 28 March 2026


Template:Infobox geopolitical organisation

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is an intergovernmental forum of all 11 states in Southeast Asia.[1] ASEAN primarily focuses on Southeast Asian economic development, peaceful coexistence and adherence to international norms.[2] ASEAN operates on the principle of consensus and respecting national sovereignty, meaning that ASEAN as a whole cannot force another member state to change its domestic laws.[3]

ASEAN has population of more than 680 million people and a purchasing power parity-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) of around 6.3% global GDP.[4] ASEAN member states represent a diverse set of economies: the least developed countries like Laos, to emerging economies like Vietnam, to developed economies like Singapore. Many Southeast Asian projects have originated from decentralized initiatives between member states, such as the ASEAN Power Grid, ASEAN Free Trade Area, ASEAN Integrated QR Code Payment System, or the mutual ASEAN visa-free policies. Every two years, it organizes a sporting event to promote cultural exchange known as SEA Games.

ASEAN has strong ties with East Asian and South Asian countries. It have vested interest in the security of the South China Sea and the greater Indo-Pacific region.[5] In terms of diplomacy, ASEAN operates on a principle of centrality, meaning that all concerns from other countries or organizations about Southeast Asia should be routed to ASEAN instead of individual states.[3] All Southeast Asian countries, many great powers, and international organizations have dedicated diplomatic presence near ASEAN headquarters in Jakarta.

The roots of ASEAN came from the ASEAN Declaration signed by five Southeast Asian countries in 1967. Originally, ASEAN was founded to contain communism,[1] but gradually ASEAN was reoriented to focus on economic development and prevent foreign interference in Southeast Asia as a whole. As ASEAN expanded and admitted other countries, the member states eventually signed a binding ASEAN Charter in 2008. As of 2026, ASEAN are currently dealing with many threats, such as the worsening civil war in Myanmar, territorial disputes in the South China Sea and managing U.S.–China tensions. Nevertheless, it is widely considered to be a successful example of regional collaboration, and its emphasis on de facto standards is seen as an opposite to the legal nature of the European Union.[6]

History[edit | edit source]

Background[edit | edit source]

Template:Further info Besides their close geographic proximity, political scholars consider Southeast Asian nations "cultural crossroads" between East Asia and South Asia, located at critical junctions of the South China Sea as well as the Indian Ocean, and as a result received a great deal of Islamic and Persian influence prior to the European colonial ages.[7][8]

Since around 100 BCE, the Southeast Asian archipelago occupied a central position at the crossroads of the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea trading routes, which stimulated the economy and the influx of ideas.[9] This included the introduction of abugida scripts to Southeast Asia as well as the Chinese script to Vietnam. Besides various indigenous scripts, various abugida Brahmic scripts were widespread in both continental and insular Southeast Asia. Historically, scripts such as Pallava, Kawi (from ancient Sanskrit script) and Rencong or Surat Ulu were used to write Old Malay, until they were replaced by Jawi during Islamic missionary missions in the Malay Archipelago.[10]

European colonialism influenced most ASEAN countries, including French Indochina (present-day Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia), British Burma, Malaya and Borneo (present-day Myanmar, Malaysia and Singapore, and Brunei), Dutch East Indies (present day Indonesia), Spanish East Indies (present-day Philippines and various other colonies), and Portuguese Timor (present-day Timor-Leste), with only Thailand (then Siam) not formed from a prior European colony.[11] Siam served as the buffer state, sandwiched between British Burma and French Indochina, but its kings had to contend with unequal treaties as well as British and French political interference and territorial losses after the Franco-Siamese conflict of 1893 and the Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909.[12] Under European colonisation, Southeast Asian nations were introduced to European religions and technologies, as well as the Latin alphabet.

The Empire of Japan, in the vein of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere concept, sought to unite and create a pan-Asian identity against Western colonial occupation, but Japan's alliance with the Axis powers in World War II soured relations between many colonies of Europe and the United States.[13][14] Defeat of Imperial Japan eventuated in decolonisation movements throughout Southeast Asia, resulting in the independent ASEAN states seen today.

Formation[edit | edit source]

A newsreel documenting the signing ceremony of the ASEAN Declaration on 8 August 1967 (ASEAN Day)
Signing of the ASEAN Declaration by the five Foreign Ministers at Saranrom Palace in Bangkok

The predecessor of ASEAN was the Association of Southeast Asia (ASA), formed on 31 July 1961 and consisting of Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaya.[15][16] ASEAN itself was created on 8 August 1967, when the foreign ministers of five countries - Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand - signed the ASEAN Declaration at Saranrom Palace in Bangkok, negotiated in Lam Thaen Guest House.[17] According to the Declaration, ASEAN aims to accelerate economic, social, and cultural development in the region, as well as promoting regional peace, to collaborate on matters of shared interest, and to promote Southeast Asian studies and maintain close cooperation with existing international organisations.[18][19]

The creation of ASEAN was initially motivated by the desire to contain communism,[1][20] which took a foothold in mainland Asia after World War II, with the formation of communist governments in North Korea, China, and Vietnam, accompanied by the so-called communist "emergency" in British Malaya, and unrest in the recently decolonised Philippines.

These events also encouraged the earlier formation of the South East Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), led by the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, with several Southeast Asian partners in 1954 as an extension of "containment" policy, seeking to create an Eastern version of NATO.[21] However, the local member states of ASEAN group achieved greater cohesion in the mid-1970s following a change in the balance of power after the Fall of Saigon and the end of the Vietnam War in April 1975 and the decline of SEATO.[22][23]

Singapore's Tommy Koh (middle) leads the ASEAN Coalition at a UN press conference during the Cambodian–Vietnamese War, 20 July 1981.

ASEAN's first summit meeting, held in Bali, Indonesia, in 1976, resulted in an agreement on several industrial projects and the signing of a Treaty of Amity and Cooperation, and a Declaration of Concord. The end of the Cold War allowed ASEAN countries to exercise greater political independence in the region, and in the 1990s, ASEAN emerged as a leading voice on regional trade and security issues.[24]

Members pose after the Signing of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) in Singapore, 28 January 1992

On 15 December 1995, the Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty was signed to turn Southeast Asia into a nuclear-weapon-free zone. The treaty took effect on 28 March 1997 after all but one of the member states had ratified it. It became fully effective on 21 June 2001 after the Philippines ratified it, effectively banning all nuclear weapons in the region.[25]

Expansion[edit | edit source]

Video: ASEAN explained in 5 minutes

On 7 January 1984, Brunei became ASEAN's sixth member[26] and on 28 July 1995, following the end of the Cold War, Vietnam joined as the seventh member.[27] Laos and Myanmar (formerly Burma) joined two years later on 23 July 1997.[28] Cambodia was to join at the same time as Laos and Myanmar, but a Cambodian coup in 1997 and other internal instability delayed its entry.[29] It then joined on 30 April 1999 following the stabilisation of its government.[28][30] Timor-Leste joined ASEAN on 26 October 2025 during the 47th ASEAN Summit as its 11th member, completing a two-decade accession process.[31][32]

In 2006, ASEAN was given observer status at the United Nations General Assembly.[33] In response, the organisation awarded the status of "dialogue partner" to the UN.[34] The UK and ASEAN have also pursued a dialogue partnership.[35]

The ASEAN Charter[edit | edit source]

On 15 December 2008, the member states met in Jakarta to launch the charter signed in November 2007, to move closer to "an EU-style community".[36] The charter formally established ASEAN as a legal entity, aiming to create a single trade bloc for a region encompassing 500 million people. Indonesian president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono stated: "This is a momentous development when ASEAN is consolidating, integrating, and transforming itself into a community. It is achieved while ASEAN seeks a more vigorous role in Asian and global affairs at a time when the international system is experiencing a seismic shift". Referring to climate change and economic upheaval, he concluded: "Southeast Asia is no longer the bitterly divided, war-torn region it was in the 1960s and 1970s".

The 2008 financial crisis was seen as a threat to the charter's goals,[37] and also set forth the idea of a proposed human rights body to be discussed at a future summit in February 2009. This proposition caused controversy, although the body would not have the power to impose sanctions or punish countries which violated citizens' rights and would, therefore, be limited in effectiveness.[38] The body was established later in 2009 as the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR).

In November 2012, the commission adopted the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration.[39] However, their human rights declaration has been critiqued widely by the international community, with the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights stating that the declaration was worded in problematic ways that do not easily align with international norms. Likewise, the Human Rights Watch in the United States of America noted several important fundamental rights were omitted or not clearly established.[40]

The chairmanship of ASEAN rotates among the member states. The Philippines holds the position for 2026. Recent ASEAN chairs are as follows:[41]

ASEAN Chairs
Year Country Year Country Year Country
2008  Thailand 2015  Malaysia 2022  Cambodia
2009  Thailand 2016  Laos 2023  Indonesia
2010  Vietnam 2017  Philippines 2024  Laos
2011  Indonesia 2018  Singapore 2025  Malaysia
2012  Cambodia 2019  Thailand 2026  Philippines
2013  Brunei 2020  Vietnam
2014  Myanmar 2021  Brunei

Public health[edit | edit source]

In response to pandemics, ASEAN has coordinated with ASEAN+3 and other actors to create a regional public health response.[42]

SARS outbreak[edit | edit source]

During the SARS outbreak, ASEAN and ASEAN+3 worked together to devise a response to the outbreak. Immediate and short-to-medium term measures were devised. The parties agreed to enhance sharing of best practices against the disease while also agreeing to bolster collaboration between their respective health authorities and harmonise travel procedures to ensure that proper health screening would occur. In addition, China offered to contribute $1.2 million to the ASEAN SARS fund, made both to show that it was willing to cooperate with the rest of the region and make amends for its withholding of information during the initial stages of the outbreak.[43]

H1N1 Pandemic[edit | edit source]

ASEAN held a special meeting between ASEAN and ASEAN+3 health ministers on 8 May 2009, on responding to the H1N1 pandemic.[44] At this meeting, it was agreed that hotlines would be established between public health authorities, joint response teams would be formed, and oaseangoing research efforts would be bolstered.

Myanmar crisis[edit | edit source]

Since 2017, political, military and ethnic affairs in Myanmar have posed unusual challenges for ASEAN, creating precedent-breaking situations and threatening the traditions and unity of the group, and its global standing[45][46][47] - with ASEAN responses indicating possible fundamental change in the nature of the organisation.[48][49][50]

Rohingya genocide[edit | edit source]

The Rohingya genocide erupting in Myanmar in August 2017 - killing thousands of Rohingya people in Myanmar,[51][52][53] driving most into neighbouring Bangladesh, and continuing for months[54][55][56] - created a global outcry demanding ASEAN take action against the civilian-military coalition government of Myanmar, which had long discriminated against the Rohingya, and had launched the 2017 attacks upon them.[57][58][59]

2021 Myanmar coup[edit | edit source]

On 1 February 2021, the day before a newly elected slate of civilian leaders was to take office in Myanmar, a military junta overthrew Myanmar's civilian government in a coup d'etat, declaring a national state of emergency, imposing martial law, arresting elected civilian leaders, violently clamping down on dissent, and replacing civilian government with the military's appointees. Widespread protests and resistance erupted, and elements of the civilian leadership formed an underground "National Unity Government" (NUG). Global opposition to the coup emerged, and global pressure was brought on ASEAN to take action.[60][61][62][63]

Member states[edit | edit source]

Map showing the member states of ASEAN

Template:Supranational Asian Bodies

List of member states[edit | edit source]

State Accession[64]
Brunei Brunei Darussalam January 7, 1984
Template:Country data KHMTemplate:Preview warning Cambodia April 30, 1999
Indonesia Indonesia August 8, 1967
Template:Country data LAOTemplate:Preview warning Laos July 23, 1997
Malaysia Malaysia August 8, 1967
Template:Country data MMRTemplate:Preview warning Myanmar July 23, 1997
Philippines Philippines August 8, 1967
Singapore Singapore August 8, 1967
Thailand Thailand August 8, 1967
Template:Country data TLSTemplate:Preview warning Timor-Leste October 26, 2025
Vietnam Vietnam July 28, 1995

Observer states[edit | edit source]

There is currently one state seeking accession to ASEAN: Papua New Guinea.[65][66]

There are two states seeking for observer status in ASEAN; Fiji and Bangladesh.[67][68]

There was also one state that had formally pursued accession to ASEAN but later stopped, which was Sri Lanka.

Dialogue partners[edit | edit source]

Sectoral Dialogue partners[edit | edit source]

Development partners[edit | edit source]

The ASEAN Way[edit | edit source]

The ASEAN Way refers to a methodology or approach to solving issues that respect Southeast Asia's cultural norms. Masilamani and Peterson summarise it as:[73]

A working process or style that is informal and personal. Policymakers constantly utilise compromise, consensus, and consultation in the informal decision-making process... it above all prioritises a consensus-based, non-conflictual way of addressing problems. Quiet diplomacy allows ASEAN leaders to communicate without bringing the discussions into the public view. Members avoid the embarrassment that may lead to further conflict.

It has been said that the merits of the ASEAN Way might "be usefully applied to global conflict management". However, critics have argued that such an approach can be only applied to Asian countries, to specific cultural norms and understandings notably, due to a difference in mindset and level of tension.[74]:pp113–118 Critics object, claiming that the ASEAN Way's emphasis on consultation, consensus, and non-interference forces the organisation to adopt only those policies which satisfy the lowest common denominator. Decision-making by consensus requires members to see eye-to-eye before ASEAN can move forward on an issue. Members may not have a common conception of the meaning of the ASEAN Way. Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos emphasise non-interference while older member countries focus on co-operation and co-ordination. These differences hinder efforts to find common solutions to particular issues, but also make it difficult to determine when collective action is appropriate in a given situation.[75]:161–163

Structure[edit | edit source]

The ASEAN Headquarters in South Jakarta, Indonesia.

Beginning in 1997, heads of each member state adopted the ASEAN Vision 2020 during the group's 30th anniversary meeting held in Kuala Lumpur. As a means for the realisation of a single ASEAN community, this vision provides provisions on peace and stability, a nuclear-free region, closer economic integration, human development, sustainable development, cultural heritage, being a drug-free region, environment among others. The vision also aimed to "see an outward-looking ASEAN playing a pivotal role in the international fora, and advancing ASEAN's common interests".[76][77]

ASEAN Vision 2020 was formalised and made comprehensive through the Bali Concord II in 2003.[78]

Three major pillars of a single ASEAN community were established:[79]

  • Political-Security Community (APSC)[80]
  • Economic Community (AEC)[81]
  • Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC)[82]

To fully embody the three pillars as part of the 2015 integration, blueprints for APSC and ASCC were subsequently adopted in 2009 in Cha-am, Thailand.[83] The ASEAN Community, initially planned to commence by 2020, was accelerated to begin by 31 December 2015.[84] It was decided during the 12th ASEAN Summit in Cebu in 2007.[85]

APSC Blueprint[edit | edit source]

During the 14th ASEAN Summit, the group adopted the APSC Blueprint.[86] This document is aimed at creating a robust political-security environment within ASEAN, with programs and activities outlined to establish the APSC by 2016. It is based on the ASEAN Charter, the ASEAN Security Community Plan of Action, and the Vientiane Action Program. The APSC aims to create a sense of responsibility toward comprehensive security and a dynamic, outward-looking region in an increasingly integrated and interdependent world.

The ASEAN Defense Industry Collaboration (ADIC) was proposed at the 4th ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM) on 11 May 2010 in Hanoi.[87] Its purpose, among others, is to reduce defence imports from non-ASEAN countries by half and to further develop the defence industry in the region.[88] It was formally adopted on the next ADMM on 19 May 2011, in Jakarta, Indonesia.[89] The main focus is to industrially and technologically boost the security capability of ASEAN,[88] consistent with the principles of flexibility and non-binding and voluntary participation among the member states.[90][87] The concept revolves around education and capability-building programs to develop the skills and capabilities of the workforce, production of capital for defence products, and the provision of numerous services to address the security needs of each member state. It also aims to develop an intra-ASEAN defence trade.[87] ADIC aims to establish a strong defence industry relying on the local capabilities of each member state and limit annual procurement from external original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).[87] Countries like the US, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, UK, China, South Korea, Israel, and the Netherlands are among the major suppliers to ASEAN.[88] ASEAN defence budget rose by 147% from 2004 to 2013 and is expected to rise further in the future.[91] Factors affecting the increase include economic growth, ageing equipment, and the plan to strengthen the establishment of the defence industry.[92] ASEANAPOL is also established to enhance cooperation on law enforcement and crime control among police forces of member states.[93]

AEC Blueprint[edit | edit source]

ASEAN leaders sign the declaration of the ASEAN Economic Community during the 27th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, 2015.

The AEC aims to "implement economic integration initiatives" to create a single market for member states.[94][95] The blueprint that serves as a comprehensive guide for the establishment of the community was adopted on 20 November 2007 at the 13th ASEAN Summit in Singapore.[94][96] Its characteristics include a single market and production base, a highly competitive economic region, a region of fair economic development, and a region fully integrated into the global economy. The areas of cooperation include human resources development, recognition of professional qualifications, closer consultation economic policies, enhanced infrastructure and communications connectivity, integrating industries for regional sourcing, and strengthening private sector involvement. Through the free movement of skilled labour, goods, services and investment, ASEAN would rise globally as one market, thus increasing its competitiveness and opportunities for development.[97]

To track the progress of the AEC, a compliance tool called the AEC Scorecard was developed based on the EU Internal Market Scorecard.[98] It is the only one in effect[99] and is expected to serve as an unbiased assessment tool to measure the extent of integration and the economic health of the region. It is expected to provide relevant information about regional priorities, and thus foster productive, inclusive, and sustainable growth.[100] It makes it possible to monitor the implementation of ASEAN agreements, and the achievement of milestones indicated in the AEC Strategic Schedule. The scorecard outlines specific actions that must be undertaken collectively and individually to establish AEC by 2015.[100] To date, two official scorecards have been published, one in 2010,[101] and the other in 2012.[102][98] However, the scorecard is purely quantitative, as it only examines whether a member state has performed the AEC task or not. The more "yes" answers, the higher the score.[99]

APAEC blueprint[edit | edit source]

Part of the work towards the ASEAN Economic Community is the integration of the energy systems of the ASEAN member states. The blueprint for this integration is provided by the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC).[103] APAEC is managed by the ASEAN Center for Energy. The realisation of the ASEAN Power Grid (APG) is an important part of APAEC and ASEAN energy cooperation more broadly.[104]

2020 ASEAN Banking Integration Framework[edit | edit source]

As trade is liberalised with the integration in 2015, the need arises for ASEAN banking institutions to accommodate and expand their services to an intra-ASEAN market. Experts, however, have already forecast a shaky economic transition, especially for smaller players in the banking and financial services industry. Two separate reports by Standard & Poor's (S&P) outline the challenges that ASEAN financial institutions face as they prepare for the 2020 banking integration.[lower-alpha 1] The reports point out that overcrowded banking sector in the Philippines is expected to feel the most pressure as the integration welcomes tighter competition with bigger and more established foreign banks.[105] As a result, there needs to be a regional expansion by countries with a small banking sector to lessen the impact of the post-integration environment. In a follow-up report, S&P recently cited the Philippines for "shoring up its network bases and building up capital ahead of the banking integration – playing defense and strengthening their domestic networks".[105]

Financial integration roadmap[edit | edit source]

The roadmap for financial integration is the latest regional initiative that aims to strengthen local self-help and support mechanisms. The roadmap's implementation would contribute to the realisation of the AEC. Adoption of a common currency, when conditions are ripe, could be the final stage of the AEC. The roadmap identifies approaches and milestones in capital market development, capital account and financial services liberalisation, and ASEAN currency cooperation. Capital market development entails promoting institutional capacity as well as the facilitation of greater cross-border collaboration, linkages, and harmonisation between capital markets. Orderly capital account liberalisation would be promoted with adequate safeguards against volatility and systemic risks. To expedite the process of financial services liberalisation, ASEAN has agreed on a positive list modality and adopted milestones to facilitate negotiations. Currency cooperation would involve the exploration of possible currency arrangements, including an ASEAN currency payment system for trade in local goods to reduce the demand for US dollars and to help promote stability of regional currencies, such as by settling intra-ASEAN trade using regional currencies.[106]

Food security[edit | edit source]

ASEAN aid during the Marawi Crisis. Member states are obligated to help one another under the "One ASEAN, One Response" system

Member states recognise the importance of strengthening food security to maintain stability and prosperity in the region.[107] As ASEAN moves towards AEC and beyond, food security would be an integral part of the community-building agenda.[108] Strengthened food security is even more relevant in light of potentially severe risks from climate change with agriculture and fisheries being the most affected industries.[109]

Part of the aim of ASEAN integration is to achieve food security collectively via trade in rice and maize. Trade facilitation measures and the harmonisation/equivalency of food regulation and control standards would reduce the cost of trade in food products. While specialisation and revealed comparative and competitive indices point to complementarities between trade patterns among the member states, intra-ASEAN trade in agriculture is quite small, something that integration could address.[110] The MARKET project would provide flexible and demand-driven support to the ASEAN Secretariat while bringing more private-sector and civil-society input into regional agriculture policy dialogue. By building an environment that reduces barriers to trade, ASEAN trade would increase, thereby decreasing the risk of food price crisis.[111]

ASCC Blueprint[edit | edit source]

The ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) was also adopted during the 14th ASEAN Summit.[112] It envisions an "ASEAN Community that is people-centered and socially responsible with a view to achieving enduring solidarity and unity among the countries and peoples of ASEAN by forging a common identity and building a caring and sharing society which is inclusive and harmonious where the well-being, livelihood, and welfare of the peoples are enhanced". Its focus areas include human development, social welfare and protection, social justice and rights, environmental sustainability, building the ASEAN identity, and narrowing the development gap.

Economy[edit | edit source]

Page Template:Sticky header/styles.css has no content.

GDP statistics by country, in 2025
Country[113] Population
(millions)
GDP Nominal GDP (PPP)
millions of
USD
per capita
USD
millions of
Int$
per capita
Int$
 Indonesia 279.965 1,430,000 (2025f)[114] 5,030 5,010,000 17,610
 Singapore 5.938 564,770 (2025f)[115] 92,930 952,640 156,760
 Thailand 65.975 546,220 (2025f)[116] 7,770 1,850,000 26,320
 Philippines 114.161 497,500 (2025f)[117] 4,350 1,480,000 12,920
 Vietnam 100.770 490,970 (2025f)[118] 4,810 1,790,000 17,689
 Malaysia 33.460 444,980 (2025f)[119] 13,140 1,470,000 43,470
 Myanmar 54.506 64,940 (2025f)[120] 1,180 326,890 5,920
 Cambodia 17.182 49,800 (2025f)[121] 2,870 150,050 8,650
 Laos 7.686 16,320 (2025f)[122] 2,100 78,850 10,120
 Brunei 0.442 16,010 (2025f)[123] 34,970 43,830 95,760
 Timor-Leste 1.355 2,130 (2025f)[124] 1,490 6,970 4,920
 ASEAN 684.376 4,076,690 5,957 13,152,260 19,218
The flags of the ASEAN member states in Jakarta, Indonesia

The group sought economic integration by creating the AEC by the end of 2015 that established a single market.[125] The average economic growth of member states from 1989 to 2009 was between 3.8% and 7%. This was greater than the average growth of APEC, which was 2.8%.[126] The ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), established on 28 January 1992,[127] includes a Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) to promote the free flow of goods between member states.[125] ASEAN had only six members when it was signed. The new member states (Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia) have not fully met AFTA's obligations, but are officially considered part of the agreement as they were required to sign it upon entry into ASEAN, and were given longer time frames to meet AFTA's tariff reduction obligations.[128] The next steps are to create a single market and production base, a competitive economic region, a region of equitable economic development, and a region that is fully integrated into the global economy. Since 2007, ASEAN countries have gradually lowered their import duties to member states, with a target of zero import duties by 2016.[129]

ASEAN countries have many economic zones (industrial parks, eco-industrial parks, special economic zones, technology parks, and innovation districts) (see reference for comprehensive list from 2015).[130] In 2018, eight of the ASEAN members are among the world's outperforming economies, with positive long-term prospect for the region.[131] ASEAN's Secretariat projects that the regional body will grow to become the world's fourth largest economy by 2030.[132]

The ASEAN Centre for Energy publishes the ASEAN Energy Outlook every five years, analysing and promoting the integration of national energy systems across the region. The sixth edition was published in 2020.[133]

Internal market[edit | edit source]

ASEAN planned to establish a single market based upon the four freedoms by the end of 2015, with the goal of ensuring free flow of goods, services, skilled labour, and capital. The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) was formed in 2015,[134] but the group deferred about 20% of the harmonisation provisions needed to create a common market and set a new deadline of 2025.[135] In May 2025, ASEAN adopted a new Community Vision 2045 and AEC Strategic Plan 2026–2030, maintaining a single market as a goal.[136][137]

Until the end of 2010, intra-ASEAN trade was still low as trade involved mainly exports to countries outside the region, with the exception of Laos and Myanmar, whose foreign trade was ASEAN-oriented.[138] In 2009, realised foreign direct investment (FDI) was US$37.9 billion and increased two-fold in 2010 to US$75.8 billion. 22% of FDI came from the European Union, followed by ASEAN countries (16%), and by Japan and the United States.

The ASEAN Framework Agreement on Trade in Services (AFAS) was adopted at the ASEAN Summit in Bangkok in December 1995.[139] Under the agreement, member states enter into successive rounds of negotiations to liberalise trade in services with the aim of submitting increasingly higher levels of commitment. ASEAN has concluded seven packages of commitments under AFAS.[140]

Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) have been agreed upon by ASEAN for eight professions: physicians, dentists, nurses, architects, engineers, accountants, surveyors, and tourism professionals. Individuals in these professions will be free to work in any ASEAN states effective 31 December 2015.[141][142][143]

In addition, six member states (Malaysia, Vietnam (2 exchanges), Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, and Singapore) have collaborated on integrating their stock exchanges, which includes 70% of its transaction values with the goal to compete with international exchanges.[144]

Single market will also include the ASEAN Single Aviation Market (ASEAN-SAM), the region's aviation policy geared towards the development of a unified and single aviation market in Southeast Asia. It was proposed by the ASEAN Air Transport Working Group, supported by the ASEAN Senior Transport Officials Meeting, and endorsed by the ASEAN Transport Ministers.[145] It is expected to liberalise air travel between member states allowing ASEAN airlines to benefit directly from the growth in air travel, and also free up tourism, trade, investment, and service flows.[145][146] Since 1 December 2008, restrictions on the third and fourth freedoms of the air between capital cities of member states for air passenger services have been removed,[147] while from 1 January 2009, full liberalisation of air freight services in the region took effect.[145][146] On 1 January 2011, full liberalisation on fifth freedom traffic rights between all capital cities took effect.[148] This policy supersedes existing unilateral, bilateral, and multilateral air services agreements among member states which are inconsistent with its provisions.

Monetary union[edit | edit source]

The concept of an Asian Currency Unit (ACU) started in the middle of the 1990s, prior to the 1997 Asian financial crisis.[149] It is a proposed basket of Asian currencies, similar to the European Currency Unit, which was the precursor of the Euro. The Asian Development Bank is responsible for exploring the feasibility and construction of the basket.[149][150] Since the ACU is being considered as a precursor to a common currency, it points to a dynamic economic outlook of the region.[151][152] The overall goal of a common currency is to contribute to the financial stability of a regional economy, including price stability. It means lower cost of cross-border business through the elimination of currency risk. Greater flows of intra-trade would put pressure on prices, resulting in cheaper goods and services. Individuals benefit not only from the lowering of prices, they save by not having to change money when travelling, by being able to compare prices more readily, and by the reduced cost of transferring money across borders.

However, there are conditions for a common currency: the intensity of intra-regional trade and the convergence of macroeconomic conditions. Substantial intra-ASEAN trade (which is growing, partly as a result of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) and the ASEAN Economic Community.) and economic integration is an incentive for a monetary union. Member states currently trade more with other countries (80%) than among themselves (20%). Therefore, their economies are more concerned about currency stability against major international currencies, like the US dollar. On macroeconomic conditions, member states have different levels of economic development, capacity, and priorities that translate into different levels of interest and readiness. Monetary integration, however, implies less control over national monetary and fiscal policy to stimulate the economy. Therefore, greater convergence in macroeconomic conditions is being enacted to improve conditions and confidence in a common currency.[106] Other concerns include weaknesses in the financial sectors, inadequacy of regional-level resource pooling mechanisms and institutions required to form and manage a currency union, and lack of political preconditions for monetary co-operation and a common currency.[153]

Free trade[edit | edit source]

  ASEAN
  Countries with which ASEAN has free trade agreements

In 1992, the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme was adopted as a schedule for phasing out tariffs to increase the "region's competitive advantage as a production base geared for the world market". This law would act as the framework for the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), which is an agreement by member states concerning local manufacturing in ASEAN. It was signed on 28 January 1992 in Singapore.[127]

The Port of Singapore currently held as the world's second-busiest port

Free trade initiatives in ASEAN are spearheaded by the implementation of the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) and the Agreement on Customs. These agreements are supported by several sector bodies to plan and to execute free trade measures, guided by the provisions and the requirements of ATIGA and the Agreement on Customs. They form a backbone for achieving targets of the AEC Blueprint and establishing the ASEAN Economic Community by the end of 2015.[154]

On 26 August 2007, ASEAN stated its aim of completing free trade agreements (FTA) with Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, New Zealand, and China by 2013, which is in line with the start of the ASEAN Economic Community by 2015.[155][156] In November 2007, ASEAN states signed the ASEAN Charter, a constitution governing relations among member states and establishing the group itself as an international legal entity.[157] During the same year, the Cebu Declaration on East Asian Energy Security was signed by ASEAN and the other members of the EAS (Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, China), which pursues energy security by finding energy alternatives to fossil fuels.[158]

On 27 February 2009, an FTA with Australia and New Zealand was signed. It is believed that this FTA would boost combined GDP across the 12 countries by more than US$48 billion over the period between 2000 and 2020.[159][160] The agreement with Taiwan created the ASEAN–Taiwan Free Trade Area (ACFTA), which went into full effect on 1 January 2010. In addition, ASEAN was noted to be negotiating an FTA with the European Union.[161] Bilateral trade with India crossed the US$70 billion target in 2012 (target was to reach the level by 2015).[162] Taiwan has also expressed interest in an agreement with ASEAN but needs to overcome diplomatic objections from China.[163]

ASEAN, together with its six major trading partners (Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, China), began the first round of negotiations on 26–28 February 2013, in Bali, Indonesia on the establishment of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP),[164] which is an extension of ASEAN Plus Three and Six that covers 45% of the world's population and about a third of the world's total GDP.[165][166][167]

In 2019, Reuters highlighted a mechanism used by traders to avoid the 70% tariff on ethanol imported into Taiwan from the United States, involving importing the fuel into Malaysia, mixing it with at least 40% ASEAN-produced fuel, and re-exporting it to China tariff-free under ACFTA rules.[168]

Electricity trade[edit | edit source]

Cross-border electricity trade in ASEAN has been limited, despite efforts since 1997 to establish an ASEAN Power Grid and associated trade.[104] Electricity trade accounts for only about 5% of the generation, whereas trades in coal and gas are 86% and 53% respectively.[169][170]

Tourism[edit | edit source]

With the institutionalisation of visa-free travel between ASEAN member states, intra-ASEAN travel has escalated. In 2010, 47% or 34 million out of 73 million tourists in ASEAN member-states were from other ASEAN countries.[171] Cooperation in tourism was formalised in 1976, following the formation of the Sub-Committee on Tourism (SCOT) under the ASEAN Committee on Trade and Tourism. The 1st ASEAN Tourism Forum was held on 18–26 October 1981 in Kuala Lumpur. In 1986, ASEAN Promotional Chapters for Tourism (APCT) were established in Hong Kong, West Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia/New Zealand, Japan, and North America.[172]

Tourism has been one of the key growth sectors in ASEAN and has proven resilient amid global economic challenges. The wide array of tourist attractions across the region drew 109 million tourists to ASEAN in 2015, up by 34% compared to 81 million tourists in 2011. As of 2012, tourism was estimated to account for 4.6% of ASEAN GDP—10.9% when taking into account all indirect contributions. It directly employed 9.3 million people, or 3.2% of total employment, and indirectly supported some 25 million jobs.[173][174] In addition, the sector accounted for an estimated 8% of total capital investment in the region.[175] In January 2012, ASEAN tourism ministers called for the development of a marketing strategy. The strategy represents the consensus of ASEAN National Tourism Organisations (NTOs) on marketing directions for ASEAN moving forward to 2015.[176] In the 2013 Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI) report, Singapore placed 1st, Malaysia placed 8th, Thailand placed 9th, Indonesia placed 12th, Brunei placed 13th, Vietnam placed 16th, Philippines placed 17th, and Cambodia placed 20th as the top destinations of travellers in the Asia–Pacific region.[177]

1981 The ASEAN Tourism Forum (ATF) was established. It is a regional meeting of NGOs, Ministers, sellers, buyers and journalists to promote the ASEAN countries as a single one tourist destination. The annual event 2019 in Ha Long marks the 38th anniversary and involves all the tourism industry sectors of the 11 member states of ASEAN: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Vietnam. It was organised by TTG Events from Singapore.

Cooperation funds[edit | edit source]

Skyline of China-ASEAN Business Center in Qingxiu District

The establishment of the China-ASEAN Investment Cooperation Fund was announced in 2009 by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao began operations in 2010.[178] The fund, which is sponsored by the Export-Import Bank of China, among other institutional investors, became the first Southeast Asia-focused private equity fund approved by China's State Council and the National Development and Reform Commission.[179] The Export-Import Bank of China is the "anchor sponsor" with a "seed investment" of US$300 million.[180] Three other Chinese institutions invested a combined US$500 million.[180] The International Finance Corporation of the World Bank invested US$100 million.[180]

In November 2011, the China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation fund was established.[181](p160) China underwrote the fund, which is valued at RMB 3 billion.[181](p160)

Foreign relations[edit | edit source]

Royal Thai Embassy, Helsinki, flying its own national flag as well as ASEAN's flag

ASEAN maintains a global network of alliances, dialogue partners and diplomatic missions, and is involved in numerous international affairs.[182][183][184][185] The organisation maintains good relationships on an international scale, particularly towards Asia-Pacific nations, and upholds itself as a neutral party in politics. It holds ASEAN Summits, where heads of government of each member states meet to discuss and resolve regional issues, as well as to conduct other meetings with countries outside the bloc to promote external relations and deal with international affairs. The first summit was held in Bali in 1976. The third summit was in Manila in 1987, and during this meeting, it was decided that the leaders would meet every five years.[186] The fourth meeting was held in Singapore in 1992 where the leaders decided to meet more frequently, every three years.[186] In 2001, it was decided that the organisation will meet annually to address urgent issues affecting the region. In December 2008, the ASEAN Charter came into force and with it, the ASEAN Summit will be held twice a year. The formal summit meets for three days, and usually includes internal organisation meeting, a conference with foreign ministers of the ASEAN Regional Forum, an ASEAN Plus Three meeting and ASEAN-CER, a meeting of member states with Australia and New Zealand.[187]

Family photo of ASEAN during the 46th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on 26 May 2025.

ASEAN is a major partner of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, developing cooperation model with the organisation in the field of security, economy, finance, tourism, culture, environmental protection, development and sustainability.[188][189][190][191] Additionally, the grouping has been closely aligned with China, cooperating across numerous areas, including economy, security, education, culture, technology, agriculture, human resource, society, development, investment, energy, transport, public health, tourism, media, environment, and sustainability.[192][193][194] It is also the linchpin in the foreign policy of Australia and New Zealand, with the three sides being integrated into an essential alliance.[195][196][197][198]

ASEAN also participates in the East Asia Summit (EAS), a pan-Asian forum held annually by the leaders of eighteen countries in the East Asian region, with ASEAN in a leadership position. Initially, membership included all member states of ASEAN plus China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, and New Zealand, but was expanded to include the United States and Russia at the Sixth EAS in 2011, as they were also important players having dominance and influence over the region. The first summit was held in Kuala Lumpur on 14 December 2005, and subsequent meetings have been held after the annual ASEAN Leaders' Meeting. The summit has discussed issues including trade, energy, and security and the summit has a role in regional community building.

Other meetings include the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting[199][200] that focus mostly on specific topics, such as defence or the environment,[201] and are attended by ministers. The ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), which met for the first time in 1994, fosters dialogue and consultation, and to promote confidence-building and preventive diplomacy in the region.[202] As of July 2007, it consists of twenty-seven participants that include all ASEAN member states, Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, China, the EU, India, Japan, North and South Korea, Mongolia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Russia, Timor-Leste, the United States, and Sri Lanka.[203] Taiwan has been excluded since the establishment of the ARF, and issues regarding the Taiwan Strait are neither discussed at ARF meetings nor stated in the ARF Chairman's Statements.

ASEAN also holds meetings with Europe during the Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM), an informal dialogue process initiated in 1996 with the intention of strengthening co-operation between the countries of Europe and Asia, especially members of the European Union and ASEAN in particular.[204] ASEAN, represented by its secretariat, is one of the forty-five ASEM partners. It also appoints a representative to sit on the governing board of Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF), a socio-cultural organisation associated with the meeting. Annual bilateral meetings between ASEAN and India, Russia and the United States are also held.

Prior to 2012, ASEAN foreign ministerial statements were not typically contentious.[181](p90) Particularly as international disagreements over the South China Sea increased, the wording of ASEAN foreign ministerial statements became more politically contended.[181](pp90–91)

Following the 2022 visit by United States Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan, ASEAN and individual member states reiterated their support of the One China policy.[181](p89)

On 12 November 2022, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba urged ASEAN countries to abandon their neutrality and condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine.[205]

Territorial disputes[edit | edit source]

South China Sea[edit | edit source]

With perceptions that there have been multiple incursions into the South China Sea by the PRC (China) and ROC (Taiwan), with land, islands and resources all having had previous overlapping claims between Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia, and various other countries, the PRC and ROC's claim into the region is seen as intrusive by many Southeast Asian countries as of 2022, potentially a reflection of the threat of Chinese expansionism into the region.[206][207][208]

Shortly after the conclusion of the South China Sea Arbitration, at the 24 July 2016 China-ASEAN Foreign Ministers summit, China assured ASEAN that it would not conduct land reclamation on the Scarborough Shoal.[209](p129) The joint statement at the conclusion of the summit emphasised the implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea and urged the parties to refrain from inhabiting currently unoccupied islands, reefs, shoals, cays, and other features.[209](p129)

Within ASEAN, Cambodia is often supportive of the PRC's positions, including on the South China Sea issue.[210](p211)

Bilateral[edit | edit source]

There have been territorial disputes between ASEAN member states such as the Cambodian–Thai border dispute between Cambodia and Thailand, Cambodian–Vietnamese border dispute between Cambodia and Vietnam,[211] and the North Borneo dispute between the Philippines and Malaysia.[212][213][214][215] The Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1978, backed by the Soviet Union, was not accepted by ASEAN. They rejected it as a violation of the principles of regional integration. ASEAN cooperated with US and Australia to oppose Vietnam's move and it sponsored a Cambodian resolution in the United Nations General Assembly. ASEAN played a major role starting in 1980 in the peace process, leading to the 1991 Paris Agreement.

Relations with other blocs[edit | edit source]

Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
  ASEAN
  ASEAN Plus Three
  ASEAN Plus Six

ASEAN Plus Three[edit | edit source]

In 1990, Malaysia proposed the creation of an East Asia Economic Caucus[216] composed of the members of ASEAN, China, Japan, and South Korea. It intended to counterbalance the growing US influence in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and Asia as a whole.[217][218] However, the proposal failed because of strong opposition from the US and Japan.[217][219] Work for further integration continued, and the ASEAN Plus Three,[220] consisting of ASEAN, China, Japan, and South Korea, was created in 1997.

ASEAN Plus Three[220] is a forum that functions as a coordinator of co-operation between the ASEAN and the three East Asian nations of China, South Korea, and Japan. Government leaders, ministers, and senior officials from the eleven members of ASEAN and the three East Asian states consult on an increasing range of issues.[221] ASEAN Plus Three is the latest development of Southeast Asia-East Asia regional co-operation. In the past, proposals, such as South Korea's call for an Asian Common Market in 1970 and Japan's 1988 suggestion for an Asian Network, have been made to bring closer regional co-operation.[222]

The first leaders' meetings were held in 1996, and 1997 to deal with Asia–Europe Meeting issues, and China and Japan each wanted regular summit meetings with ASEAN members afterwards. The group's significance and importance were strengthened by the 1997 Asian financial crisis. In response to the crisis, ASEAN closely cooperated with China, South Korea, and Japan. Since the implementation of the Joint Statement on East Asia Cooperation in 1999 at the Manila Summit, ASEAN Plus Three finance ministers have been holding periodic consultations.[223] ASEAN Plus Three, in establishing the Chiang Mai Initiative, has been credited as forming the basis for financial stability in Asia,[224] the lack of such stability having contributed to the 1997 Asian financial crisis.

12th ASEAN+3 Summit in Hua Hin, Thailand, on Oct. 24, 2009

Since the process began in 1997, ASEAN Plus Three has also focused on subjects other than finance such as the areas of food and energy security, financial co-operation, trade facilitation, disaster management, people-to-people contacts, narrowing the development gap, rural development, poverty alleviation, human trafficking, labour movement, communicable diseases, environment and sustainable development, and transnational crime, including counter-terrorism. With the aim of further strengthening the nations' co-operation, East Asia Vision Group (EAVG) II was established at the 13th ASEAN Plus Three Summit on 29 October 2010 in Hanoi to stock-take, review, and identify the future direction of the co-operation.

The ASEAN Plus Three framework also serves as a platform for the ASEAN affiliated intergovernmental organisations in China, Korea, and Japan to meet and cooperate. The ASEAN-China Centre, the ASEAN-Japan Centre, and ASEAN-Korea Centre currently convene annually to discuss ongoing projects and to discuss possible areas of cooperation vis-a-vis ASEAN.[225]

ASEAN Plus Six[edit | edit source]

12th East Asia Summit in Pasay, Philippines on November 14, 2017

ASEAN Plus Three was the first of attempts for further integration to improve existing ties of Southeast Asia with East Asian countries of China, Japan and South Korea. This was followed by the even larger East Asia Summit (EAS), which included ASEAN Plus Three as well as India, Australia, and New Zealand. This group acted as a prerequisite for the planned East Asia Community which was supposedly patterned after the European Community (now transformed into the European Union). The ASEAN Eminent Persons Group was created to study this policy's possible successes and failures.

The group became ASEAN Plus Six with Australia, New Zealand, and India, and stands as the linchpin of the Asia–Pacific's economic, political, security, socio-cultural architecture, as well as the global economy.[226][227][228][229] Codification of the relations between these countries has seen progress through the development of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, a free-trade agreement involving the 15 countries of ASEAN Plus Six (excluding India). RCEP would, in part, allow the members to protect local sectors and give more time to comply with the aim for developed country members.[230]

India temporarily does not join the RCEP for the protection of its own market, but Japan, China, and ASEAN welcomes India's participation.[231]

Taiwan has been excluded from participating with the organisation owing to China's influence on the Asia–Pacific through its economic and diplomatic influence.[232]

Environment[edit | edit source]

Haze over Borneo, 2006
Greenhouse gas emissions per capita of different ASEAN countries.

At the turn of the 21st century, ASEAN began to discuss environmental agreements. These included the signing of the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution in 2002 as an attempt to control haze pollution in Southeast Asia, arguably the region's most high-profile environmental issue.[233] Unfortunately, this was unsuccessful due to the outbreaks of haze in 2005, 2006, 2009, 2013, and 2015. Thirteen years after signing the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution, the situation with respect to the long term issue of Southeast Asian haze had not changed for 50% of the ASEAN member states, and still remained as a crisis every two years during summer and fall.[234][235][236]

Trash dumping from foreign countries (such as Japan and Canada) to ASEAN has yet to be discussed and resolved.[237] Important issues include deforestation (with Indonesia recorded the largest loss of forest in the region, more than other member states combined in the 2001–2013 period[238]), plastic waste dumping (5 member states were among the top 10 out of 192 countries based on 2010 data, with Indonesia ranked as second worst polluter[239]), threatened mammal species (Indonesia ranked the worst in the region with 184 species under threat[240]), threatened fish species (Indonesia ranked the worst in the region[241]), threatened (higher) plant species (Malaysia ranked the worst in the region[242]).

Solar irradiance map of South and Southeast Asia, showing the high potential of solar power in ASEAN.

ASEAN's aggregate economy is one of the fastest growing in the world. It is expected to grow by 4.6% in 2019, and 4.8% in 2020, but at the cost of the release about 1.5 billion tonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere every year. That makes ASEAN a greater source of greenhouse gas emissions than Japan (1.3 billion tonnes per year) or Germany (796 million tonnes per year). It is the only region in the world where coal is expected to increase its share of the energy mix.[103][243] According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), "Since 2000 [ASEAN's] overall energy demand has grown by more than 80% and the lion's share of this growth has been met by a doubling in fossil fuel use,... Oil is the largest element in the regional energy mix and coal, largely for power generation, has been the fastest growing."[132][243] ASEAN has been criticised for not doing enough to mitigate climate change although it is the world's most vulnerable region in terms of climate impact.[103][244]

ASEAN has many opportunities for renewable energy.[245][246][104] With solar and wind power plus off river pumped hydro storage, ASEAN electricity industry could achieve very high penetration (78%–97%) of domestic solar and wind energy resources at a competitive levelised costs of electricity range from 55 to 115 U.S. dollars per megawatt-hour based on 2020 technology costs.[245] Vietnam's experience in solar and wind power development provides relevant implications for the other ASEAN countries.[246] The proposed ASEAN Power Grid could allow for renewable energy transmission from large producers like Vietnam to others within ASEAN.

Energy transition[edit | edit source]

Total primary energy supply by fuel (ASEAN, 2020)[247]

  Oil (32%)
  Coal (26%)
  Natural gas (20%)
  Traditional use of Biomass (5%)
  Renewables (18%)

The ASEAN has initiated its transition to cleaner energy sources. This transition is characterised as Demanding, Doable, and Dependent.[248] With approximately 700 million inhabitants, the region is witnessing a substantial surge in energy demand, projected to triple by 2050. However, transitioning energy sources requires significant resources.[citation needed] Southeast Asia would need to invest US$27 billion annually in renewable energy to achieve the target of 23% renewables in the primary energy supply by 2025. Nevertheless, this goal is attainable with the implementation of appropriate policies.[248]

Vietnam serves as a compelling example of rapid adoption of solar and wind energy.[249] Since 2019, Vietnam has emerged as a regional leader, with solar and wind energy accounting for 13% of its electricity mix in 2022, a remarkable increase from nearly zero in 2017. Though, the region requires international assistance to meet its net-zero emission targets.[248] Phasing out coal remains a daunting task, although countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam have pledged to phasing out coal power by 2040s.[250] Several high-profile leaders such as the head of the Indonesian national energy company PLN, Darmawan Prasodjo, have stated that the ASEAN Power Grid proposal is key to unlocking the potential for green energy in southeast Asia.[251]

Education[edit | edit source]

ASEAN Delegation at the EU-ASEAN Youth Diplomat Program 2023 in Faculty of International Relations of University Malaya

To enhance the region's status in education, ASEAN education ministers have agreed four priorities for education at all levels, promoting ASEAN awareness among ASEAN citizens, particularly youth, strengthening ASEAN identity through education, building ASEAN human resources in the field of education strengthening the ASEAN University Network.[252] At the 11th ASEAN Summit in December 2005, leaders set new direction for regional education collaboration when they welcomed the decision of the ASEAN education ministers to convene meetings on a regular basis. The annual ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting oversees co-operation efforts on education at the ministerial level. With regard to implementation, programs, and activities are carried out by the ASEAN Senior Officials on Education (SOM-ED). SOM-ED also manages co-operation on higher education through the ASEAN University Network (AUN).[253] It is a consortium of Southeast Asian tertiary institutions of which 30 currently belong as participating universities.[254] Founded in November 1995 by 11 universities,[255] the AUN was established to:[252] promote co-operation among ASEAN scholars, academics, and scientists, develop academic and professional human resources, promote information dissemination among the ASEAN academic community, enhance awareness of a regional identity and the sense of "ASEAN-ness" among member states.

In November 2011, ten vocational schools and centres were established in China to help develop human resources to assist in the economic and social development of the ASEAN countries.[181](p160)

ASEAN also has a scholarship program offered by Singapore to the 9 other member states for secondary school, junior college, and university education. It covers accommodation, food, medical benefits and accident insurance, school fees, and examination fees. Its recipients, who perform well on the GCE Advanced Level Examination, may apply for ASEAN undergraduate scholarships, which are tailored specifically to undergraduate institutions in Singapore and other ASEAN member countries.[256][257]

'Australia for ASEAN' scholarships are also offered by the Australian Government to the 'next generation of leaders' from ASEAN member states. By undertaking a Master's degree, recipients are to develop the skills and knowledge to drive change, help build links with Australia, and also participate in the Indo-Pacific Emerging Leaders Program to help develop the ASEAN Outlook for the Indo-Pacific. Each ASEAN member state is able to receive ten 'Australia for ASEAN' scholarships.[258]

Demographics[edit | edit source]

The Jakarta metropolitan area, the largest city in the world, is nicknamed "the capital of ASEAN."[259][260][261]

In July 2019, the population of the ASEAN was about 655 million people (8.5% of the world population).[262][263][needs update] In ASEAN in 2019, 55.2 million people were children age 0–4 and 46.3 million people were older than 65. This corresponds to 8.4% and 7.1% of the total ASEAN population. The region's population growth is 1.1% per year. Thailand is the lowest at 0.2% per year, and Cambodia is the highest at 1.9% per year. ASEAN's sex ratio is 99.4 males per 100 females, as of 2017.[264][better source needed]

Urbanisation[edit | edit source]

Just over half (around 50.1%) of Southeast Asia's inhabitants lived in urban areas in 2020, projected to rise to 55.6% in 2030, a total of almost 405 million people.[265] Urbanisation is concentrated in coastal plains and river deltas, giving the region a dense belt of large cities around the Java Sea, South China Sea and Gulf of Thailand.[266] Southeast Asia contains dozens of metropolitan areas with populations of over 1 million; ASEAN data indicate that about 13% of the region's citizens live in 28 cities with more than one million inhabitants, with a further 14% in 367 settlements of between 100,000 and 1 million people.[267]

With a population of roughly 42 million in 2025,[268] Greater Jakarta (Jabodetabek) is the largest metropolitan area in Southeast Asia and one of the largest urban agglomerations in the world, followed by the Greater Manila Area with about 28 million inhabitants. Jakarta and Manila, together with Bangkok, form the three largest metropolitan areas in Southeast Asia and are widely classed as megacities with metropolitan populations exceeding ten million.[citation needed] They are followed by major metropolitan regions centred on Ho Chi Minh City, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Hanoi, Surabaya and other large cities across Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia. The region also contains several polycentric or corridor-type urbanised regions, including the Jakarta–Bandung mega-urban corridor (JBMUR) on Java,[269] the Singapore–Johor Bahru–Batam growth triangle (SIJORI), the extended Bangkok–Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) along the Gulf of Thailand, and cross-border clusters in the Greater Mekong Subregion and the Brunei–Indonesia–Malaysia–Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP–EAGA).[265] Template:Largest population centres

Culture[edit | edit source]

ASEAN ceremonial giant gong at Wat Ounalom Monastery in Phnom Penh, Cambodia

The organisation hosts cultural activities in an attempt to further integrate the region. These include sports and educational activities as well as writing awards. Examples of these include the ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity, ASEAN Heritage Parks[270] and the ASEAN Outstanding Scientist and Technologist Award. In addition, the ASEAN region has been recognised as one of the world's most diverse regions ethnically, religiously and linguistically.[271][272]

Media[edit | edit source]

ASEAN 2018 Press Conference in Singapore, cooperative efforts within SEA media was set by ACPM standards

Member states have promoted co-operation in information to help build an ASEAN identity. One of the main bodies in ASEAN co-operation in information is the ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information (COCI). Established in 1978, its mission is to promote effective co-operation in the fields of information, as well as culture, through its various projects and activities. It includes representatives from national institutions like the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministries of Culture and Information, national radio and television networks, museums, archives and libraries, among others. The representatives meet annually to formulate and agree on projects in support of their mission.[273] On 14 November 2014, foreign ministers of member states launched the ASEAN Communication Master Plan (ACPM).[274] It provides a framework for communicating the character, structure, and overall vision of ASEAN and the ASEAN community to key audiences within the region and globally.[275]

ASEAN Media Cooperation (AMC) sets digital television standards and policies in preparation for broadcasters to transition from analogue to digital broadcasting. This collaboration was conceptualised during the 11th ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information (AMRI) Conference in Malaysia on 1 March 2012 where a consensus declared that both new and traditional media were keys to connecting ASEAN peoples and bridging cultural gaps in the region.[276] Several key initiatives under the AMC include:[277]

  • The ASEAN Media Portal[278] was launched 16 November 2007. The portal aims to provide a one-stop site that contains documentaries, games, music videos, and multimedia clips on the culture, arts, and heritage of the ASEAN countries to showcase ASEAN culture and the capabilities of its media industry.
  • The ASEAN NewsMaker Project, an initiative launched in 2009, trains students and teachers to produce informational video clips about their countries. The project was initiated by Singapore. Students trained in NewsMaker software, video production, together with developing narrative storytelling skills. Dr Soeung Rathchavy, Deputy Secretary-General of ASEAN for ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community noted that: "Raising ASEAN awareness amongst the youth is part and parcel of our efforts to build the ASEAN Community by 2015. Using ICT and the media, our youths in the region will get to know ASEAN better, deepening their understanding and appreciation of the cultures, social traditions and values in ASEAN."[279]
  • The ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting, is an annual forum for ASEAN members to set digital television (DTV) standards and policies, and to discuss progress in the implementation of the blueprint from analogue to digital TV broadcasting by 2020. During the 11th ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting[280] members updated the status on DTV implementation and agreed to inform ASEAN members on the Guidelines for ASEAN Digital Switchover.[281] An issue was raised around the availability and affordability of set-top boxes (STB), thus ASEAN members were asked to make policies to determine funding for STBs, methods of allocation, subsidies and rebates, and other methods for the allocation of STBs. It was also agreed in the meeting to form a task force to develop STB specifications for DVB-T2 to ensure efficiency.
  • The ASEAN Post was launched on 8 August 2017 to commemorate ASEAN's 50th Anniversary. It is an independent regional digital media company that is headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It was founded by former investment banker Rohan Ramakrishnan.

National public/state-owned radio and television networks of ASEAN[edit | edit source]

Music[edit | edit source]

Music plays a significant role in ASEAN affairs, as evidenced by the new music composed for, and to be performed at, the 34th ASEAN Summit in Bangkok in June 2019.[282]

Since ASEAN's founding, a number of songs have been written for the regional alliance:

Sports[edit | edit source]

The main sporting event of ASEAN is the Southeast Asian Games, a biennial meet of athletes from the eleven member-states.

Games events[edit | edit source]

  1. SEA Games
  2. ASEAN University Games
  3. ASEAN School Games
  4. ASEAN Para Games

Championships events[edit | edit source]

Bukit Jalil National Stadium during the second leg of the 2014 AFF Championship final
Team Timor-Leste scoring a goal at the 2024 ASEAN Championship
A contingent from Brunei Darussalam playing gasing, in front of Candi Prambanan during ASEAN Sports Day.
  1. Southeast Asian Football Championship (ASEAN Championship) – Since 1996
  2. Southeast Asian Basketball Championship (SEABA Championship) – Since 1994
  3. Southeast Asian Shooting Championship – Since 1967 - South East Asia Shooting Championship - 46th SEASA in 2025 in File:Flag of Chinese Taipei for Olympic games.svg Chinese Taipei [283] With HKG, TPE and some of JPN and Korea.
  4. Southeast Asian Cricket Championship
  5. Southeast Asian Handball Championship
  6. Southeast Asian Floorball Championships
  7. Southeast Asian Hockey Championship
  8. Southeast Asian Baseball Championship
  9. Southeast Asian Volleyball Championship (SEA V.League) – Since 2019
  10. Southeast Asian Sepaktakraw Championship
  11. Southeast Asian Footvolley Championship
  12. Southeast Asian Youth Athletics Championships
  13. Southeast Asian Swimming Championships
  14. Southeast Asian Gymnastics Championship
  15. Southeast Asian Cycling Championship
  16. Southeast Asian Shooting Championship
  17. Southeast Asian Archery Championship
  18. Southeast Asian Sailing Championship
  19. Southeast Asian Rowing Championship
  20. Southeast Asian Canoeing Championship
  21. Southeast Asian Boxing Championship
  22. Southeast Asian Fencing Championship
  23. Southeast Asian Kurash Championship
  24. Southeast Asian Wrestling Championship
  25. Southeast Asian Weightlifting Championship
  26. Southeast Asian Powerlifting Championship
  27. Southeast Asian Bodybuilding Championship
  28. Southeast Asian Judo Championship
  29. Southeast Asian Jujitsu Championship
  30. Southeast Asian Muaythai Championship
  31. Southeast Asian Sambo Championship
  32. Southeast Asian Vovinam Championship
  33. Southeast Asian Karate Championship
  34. Southeast Asian Taekwondo Championship
  35. Southeast Asian Wushu Championship
  36. Southeast Asian Pencak Silat Championship
  37. Southeast Asian Badminton Championship
  38. Southeast Asian Tennis Championship
  39. Southeast Asian Table Tennis Championships
  40. Southeast Asian Squash Championship
  41. Southeast Asian Chess Championship
  42. Southeast Asian Triathlon Championship
  43. Southeast Asian Golf Championship (ASEAN PGA Tour) – Since 2007
  44. Southeast Asian Esports Championship
  45. Southeast Asian Bowling Championship
  46. Southeast Asian Cue Sports Championship
  47. Southeast Asian Arnis Championship
  48. Southeast Asian Chinlone Championship
  49. Southeast Asian Contract Bridge Championship
  50. Southeast Asian Bowls Championship
  51. Southeast Asian Go Championship
  52. Southeast Asian Dragon Boat Championship
  53. Southeast Asian Obstacle Racing Championship
  54. Southeast Asian Polo Championship
  55. Southeast Asian Waterskiing Championship
  56. Southeast Asian Woodball Championship
  57. Southeast Asian Finswimming Championship
  58. Southeast Asian Kun Khmer Championship

Global influence and reception[edit | edit source]

President Joe Biden and ASEAN leaders pose for a family photo at the US-ASEAN Summit

ASEAN has been credited by many as among the world's most influential organisations and a global powerhouse.[284][285] The organisation plays a prominent role in regional and international diplomacy, politics, security, economy and trade.[286][287][288][289][290][291][292][293][294][295][296][228][excessive citations] The ASEAN Free Trade Area also stands as one of the largest and most important free trade areas in the world, and together with its network of dialogue partners, drove some of the world's largest multilateral forums and blocs, including APEC, EAS and RCEP.[296][297][298][299][295][300][excessive citations] Being one of the world's forefront political, economic and security meetings, the ASEAN Summit serves as a prominent regional (Asia) and international (worldwide) conference, with world leaders attending its related summits and meetings to discuss about various problems and global issues, strengthening cooperation, and making decisions.[301][302]

Critics have charged ASEAN with weakly promoting human rights and democracy, particularly in junta-led Myanmar.[303] Some scholars think that non-interference has hindered ASEAN efforts to handle the Myanmar issue, human rights abuse, and haze pollution in the area. Despite global outrage at the military crack-down on unarmed protesters in Yangon, ASEAN has refused to suspend Myanmar as a member and also rejects proposals for economic sanctions.[304] This has caused concern as the European Union has refused to conduct free trade negotiations at a regional level for these political reasons.[305] During a UN vote against the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya, most member states voted to either abstain or against the condemnation. Only the Muslim-majority countries Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei voted to condemn the cleansing of Rohingya.[306] Some international observers view ASEAN as a "talk shop",[307] stating that the organisation is: "big on words, but small on action".[308] "ASEAN policies have proven to be mostly rhetoric, rather than actual implementation", according to Pokpong Lawansiri, a Bangkok-based independent analyst of ASEAN. "It has been noted that less than 50% of ASEAN agreements are actually implemented, while ASEAN holds more than six hundred meetings annually".[309]

The head of the International Institute of Strategic Studies, Tim Huxley, cites the diverse political systems present in the grouping, including many young states, as a barrier to far-reaching co-operation beyond economics. He also asserts that, without an external threat to rally against after the Cold War ended, ASEAN has less successfully restrained its members and resolved such border disputes as those between Myanmar and Thailand or Indonesia and Malaysia.[310] During the 12th ASEAN Summit in Cebu, several activist groups staged anti-globalisation protests,[311] arguing that the agenda of economic integration would negatively affect industries in the Philippines and would deprive thousands of Filipinos of their jobs.[312]

Corruption remains a widespread issue, as "tea money" remains an important requirement to grease business transactions and to receive public services. Following the release of the Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 by Berlin-based graft watchdog Transparency International on 27 January, its Asia–Pacific director, Srirak Plipat, noted that: "if there was one common challenge to unite the Asia-Pacific region, it would be corruption", noting that: "from campaign pledges to media coverage to civil society forums, corruption dominates the discussion. Yet despite all this talk, there's little sign of action."[313]

Economic integration[edit | edit source]

The group's integration plan has raised concerns, in particular, the 2015 deadline. Business and economy experts who attended the Lippo-UPH Dialogue in Naypyidaw cited unresolved issues relating to aviation, agriculture, and human resources.[314] Some panelists, among them, Kishore Mahbubani, warned against high expectations at the onset. He stated: "Please do not expect a big bang event in 2015 where everything is going to happen overnight when the ASEAN Economic Community comes into being. We've made progress in some areas and unfortunately regressed in some areas."[315]

Some panelists enumerated other matters to be dealt with for a successful launch. Among them were the communications issues involving the 600 million citizens living in the region, increasing understanding in business, current visa arrangements, demand for specific skills, banking connections, and economic differences. Former Philippine National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) Secretary General Romulo A. Virola, said in 2012 that the Philippines seems unready to benefit from the integration due to its "wobbly" economic performance compared to other member states. According to Virola, the Philippines continues to lag behind in terms of employment rate, tourism, life expectancy, and cellular subscriptions.[316] Nestor Tan, head of BDO Unibank Inc., said that while some businesses see the Asian Economic Blueprint (AEC) as an opportunity, the integration would be more of a threat to local firms. Tan added that protecting the Philippines' agricultural and financial services sectors, as well as the labour sector, would be necessary for the implementation of AEC by 2015.[317] Standard & Poor's also believed that banks in the Philippines are not yet prepared for the tougher competition that would result from the integration. In one of its latest publications, S&P said banks in the country, although profitable and stable, operate on a much smaller scale than their counterparts in the region.[317]

The US Chamber of Commerce has highlighted widespread concern that the much-anticipated AEC could not be launched by the 2015 deadline.[318] In January 2014, former ASEAN Secretary-General Rodolfo C. Severino, wrote: "while ASEAN should not be condemned for its members' failure to make good on their commitments, any failure to deliver will likely lead to a loss of credibility and could mean that member states fall further behind in the global competition for export markets and foreign direct investment (FDI)".[319] In 2012, the commencement of the AEC was postponed to 31 December 2015 from the original plan of 1 January. Despite Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan's firm reassurance that "[t]here will be no more delays and that all ten ASEAN countries will participate", even the most fervent proponents of AEC worried that AEC would not be delivered on time as December 2015 neared.[98]

An article published by Vietnam News echoed some of the challenges and opportunities that Vietnam faces in preparation for the AEC. The article said that the deputy head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade, Tran Thanh Hai, was concerned about local enterprises' lack of knowledge of the AEC. It was said that 80% of local enterprises surveyed acknowledged that they have little information about the interests and challenges available for them in the ASEAN market. The article also noted that the general secretary of the Vietnam Steel Association, Chu Duc Khai, said that most of the local steel making enterprises lack information about doing business in the ASEAN market; they have not had a chance to study it, and have only exported small amounts of steel to ASEAN countries.[320] Another challenge is the need to compete with other countries in the ASEAN market to export raw products since the country had mainly exported raw products.[321] The Asian Development Bank also has doubts about Cambodia's ability to meet the AEC deadline. The leading economist of ADB, Jayant Menon, said that Cambodia needs to speed up its customs reform and to press ahead with automating processes to reduce trade costs and minimise the opportunities for corruption and be ready for the implementation of its National Single Window by 2015.[322]

Despite an ASEAN Economic Community goal of significant economic integration as laid out in the AEC Blueprint 2025, ASEAN continues to face challenges towards integration.[323] A report published by the Asian Trade Centre in 2019 identified multiple sectors that face challenges towards integration due to non-tariff barriers that still exist in the region. The report stated that the goals of the AEC 2025 would not be accomplished if ASEAN fails to address the issues of non-tariff measures and eliminate non-tariff barriers in the region.[324][325]

Security[edit | edit source]

Greeting between two naval fleets in the South China Sea during the ASEAN-India Maritime Exercise, 8 May 2023

ASEAN is recognised by its members to be one of the main forums to discuss security issues; based on the principles in its charter, its main aim is to provide an environment of common understanding and cooperation between the member states to "respond effectively to all forms of threats, transitional crimes and transboundary challenges".[326] Accordingly, ASEAN has embraced the idea of cooperative security[327] which means that ASEAN's approach to security issues is through confidence-building measures and transparency for reducing the tension and conflict between its members. Security policies and plans are concerted by the ASEAN Political-Security Community to envision "a concert of Southeast Asian nations, outward looking, living in peace, stability and prosperity, bonded together in partnership in dynamic development and in a community of caring societies."[328]

Piracy[edit | edit source]

Piracy in the strait of Malacca and in the Sulu and Celebes Sea is one of the main non-traditional security threats for the region, it has challenged the capacity of its members to ensure coordination of effective policy actions to reduce this phenomenon. As highlighted by the ReCAAP report of 2020: "The increase of incidents (in Asia) during January–June 2020 occurred in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, South China Sea and Singapore Strait."[329] The increment of incidents during 2020, have raised alerts in the region as the phenomenon of piracy could be fostered by the social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, in their Fourteenth Asean Ministerial Meeting On Transnational Crime[330] the ministers agreed that ASEAN should embrace a greater commitment to strengthen the measures in combating transnational crime in the context of the pandemic. Despite this statement, ASEAN has not updated their plans for combating piracy, although member states created and enforced the Maritime Security Plan of Action 2018-2020, to address the national legal enforcement capacities and creating a common protocol of action to counter piracy allowing the region to cooperate for ensuring the security of the Pacific Ocean, new discussions and agendas for new measures has not been enforced yet.

Accordingly, this plan reinforces the necessity to secure the seas due to the importance of this region geographical and economically, its strategic position as the main link between the Indian and the Pacific Ocean and the region serving as the main passage that connects middle east economies and India with China, Japan, South Korea and Australia. This plan is mainly focused in three priorities:[331]

  1. Shared Awareness and exchange of best practices.
  2. Confidence building measures based on international and regional legal frameworks, arrangements and cooperation.
  3. Capacity building and enhancing cooperation of maritime law enforcement agencies in the region.

In this sense, spread all over the countries of Southeast Asia, criminal organisations with complex structures pose a challenge to ASEAN's coordination capacity to solve the problem despite the plans created within its institutional framework. Although some measures have been implemented by ASEAN,[332] still the complexity of the problem requires deep solutions of cooperation that might alter the balance of its framework. The maritime security plans for the region are based on the ASEAN idea of political-security community; the two main objectives of the APSC are: "to accelerate the economic growth, social progress and cultural development by promoting an identity of equality and partnership as the main foundations of peace and prosperity".[332] Additionally, the APSC promotes "regional peace and stability through abiding respect for justice and the rule of law in the relationship among countries of the region and adherence to the principles of the United Nations Charter".[333]

Nonetheless, the institutional framework and decision-making procedures in ASEAN make difficult to reach agreements on piracy. ASEAN has struggled to deliver a coordinated response to solve this problem in the region mainly by two reasons: the first one, could be related to the focalised nature of the problem in subregions rather than the whole region. Consequently, this focalisation generates that the discussions in the main forums (The ASEAN maritime forum (AMF) and Maritime Security Expert Working Group (MSEWG)) have not resulted in actual measures that tackle piracy and involve all member states as major consensus should be reached to enforce them. One example of this, is the possibility discussed by the 10 ASEAN member states to create a joint ASEAN navy in 2015 to carry on operations in one of the piracy hotspots in the region,[334] the strait of Malacca, this proposal ended up being enforced by bilateral/sub-regional efforts rather than in the ASEAN framework (see ReCAAP for further information).[335][336][337]  The second one, consensus on non-traditional security issues has been difficult to reach due to contradictory interest between member states, particularly in joint operations between navies and the reach of these joint operations. These issues are generated mainly by unresolved territorial disputes, specially in the maritime domain, at some extent they pose a challenge to ASEAN members in their capacity to cooperate in regards to the maritime security approach.[338]

Consequently, a greater multilateral cooperation has been pushed by the members to solve the piracy challenges on economy, trading and security. Members of the ASEAN, have addressed the necessity for the regional organisation to make some concessions and rearrangements to respond to the challenges that non-traditional security (specifically piracy) issues posse to the security of the ASEAN members. Despite the efforts and plans made by the ASEAN, this organisation is expected to overcome the image of being regarded solely as a forum to discuss security issues. Two possible solutions has been proposed by some member states for this purpose: 1. Promoting relationships with other major actors regionally to overcome the short-time challenges and 2. Rearrange the institutional framework to "avoid contention and seek cooperation to maximize the aggregate ability in order to benefit from making the sea fulfil its economic, security and other goals".[338]

Future Security Framework[edit | edit source]

In addition to piracy, there are several significant issues facing ASEAN today, including human rights violations, repression, and democratic backsliding. Across the region, various political leaders are known human rights abusers, however there is no proper accountability process, and often human rights violations are sidelined by economic or political interests.[339] Myanmar is in the midst of a devastating civil war, during which the military government that was installed following a coup d'état, has carried out human rights violations against the Rohingya population.[340]

Regional Concerns About Thailand[edit | edit source]

Political instability in Thailand, particularly due to recurring military involvement in government, has raised concerns within ASEAN about regional stability. Since the 2006 coup, Thailand has experienced multiple military interventions in politics, including the 2014 coup led by General Prayuth Chan-ocha, which resulted in nearly a decade of military-backed governance.[341]

Observers note that Thailand's military dominance has complicated ASEAN's ability to respond cohesively to regional challenges. Domestic instability has at times influenced its foreign policy stance, affecting negotiations on security cooperation and regional humanitarian crises.[342]

AMNEX[edit | edit source]

The navies of ASEAN member countries participate in the different editions of the ASEAN Multilateral Naval Exercise, or AMNEX.

See also[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. ASEAN Financial Integration: The Long Road to Bank Consolidation and The Philippines' Banking System: The Good, the Bad and the Ambivalent.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Hong, Lynn; Maizland, Lindsay; Galina, Carlos; Albert, Eleanor; Fong, Clara. "What Is ASEAN?". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
  2. "Overview – ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS" (PDF).
  3. 3.0 3.1 Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka (2023). "Meanings, norms, and social constitution: revisiting ASEAN centrality in East Asian regionalism". Japanese Journal of Political Science. 24 (4): 409–423. doi:10.1017/S1468109923000257. ISSN 1468-1099.
  4. "Southeast Asia - GDP based on PPP, share of world". International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 28 March 2026.
  5. "Joint Statement by the ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting Plus (ADMM-PLUS)". Ministry of Defence. Retrieved 28 March 2026.
  6. Hwee, Yeo Lay (2013). The EU and ASEAN – In Search of a New Regional Paradigm? EU Centre Singapore Working Paper No. 15, August 2013 (PDF) (Report).
  7. Reid, Anthony (3 March 2015). A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads. John Wiley & Sons. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-118-51293-7.
  8. Muhammad Ismail Marcinkowski. "Persian Religious and Cultural Influences in Siam/Thailand and Maritime Southeast Asia in Historical Perspective: A Plea for a Concerted Interdisciplinary Approach" (PDF). Thesiamsociety.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2020. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  9. Reid, Anthony (February 1990). "An 'Age of Commerce' in Southeast Asian History". Modern Asian Studies. 24 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00001153.
  10. Fadeli, Muhammad Al-Amin Mohd; et al. (2019). Malay History & Culture – via Academia.
  11. Acharya, Amitav (22 November 2012). The Making of Southeast Asia. ISEAS Publishing. doi:10.1355/9789814311250. ISBN 978-981-4311-25-0.
  12. "Treaty between Great Britain and Siam". The American Journal of International Law. 3 (4): 297–304. 1909. doi:10.2307/2212641. ISSN 0002-9300. JSTOR 2212641. S2CID 246007886.
  13. Hirai, L. Stuart (7 December 2022). "How the US and Japan Went From Enemies to Allies After WWII". HISTORY. Retrieved 29 October 2025.
  14. "Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations - Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Retrieved 29 October 2025.
  15. Tarling, Nicholas (1999). The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: Volume 2, Part 2, From World War II to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 287. ISBN 978-0-521-66372-4. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  16. Ooi, Keat Gin (2004). Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor. ABC-CLIO. p. 186. ISBN 978-1-57607-770-2. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  17. Liow, Joseph; Leifer, Michael (20 November 2014). Dictionary of the Modern Politics of Southeast Asia. Routledge. pp. 82–85. ISBN 978-1-317-62233-8. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
  18. "The Asean Declaration (Bangkok Declaration) Bangkok, 8 August 1967". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 11 February 2015. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  19. "What We Do". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 16 May 2025. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
  20. "Historical Overview of ASEAN" (PDF).
  21. Bernard Eccleston; Michael Dawson; Deborah J. McNamara (1998). The Asia-Pacific Profile. Routledge (UK). ISBN 978-0-415-17279-0. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
  22. Beeson, Mark (2009). Institutions of the Asia–Pacific: ASEAN, APEC, and beyond. Global institutions series. London: Routledge. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-415-46504-5. Despite the previously discussed potential limitations of the ASEAN way and its preference for voluntarism and consensus, it was felt that this form of multilateralism had more chance of success than some of its institutional predecessors like SEATO, which was unable to demonstrate "either a viable political purpose or a military function."
  23. Aranal-Sereno, Maria Lourdes; Santiago, Joseph Sedfrey, eds. (1997). The ASEAN: Thirty years and beyond. Quezon City. pp. 271, 460. ISBN 978-971-15-0360-4. Regional cooperation flourished when the smaller countries took the leadership in developing such organizations as ASEAN ... As the US forces moved on to strategic weakness and disengagement, heightened insecurity caught up with Southeast Asian countries and, ironically, gave ASEAN a sense of being.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  24. Moon, C. (2014). ASEAN. Encyclopædia Britannica
  25. Bangkok Treaty (in alphabetical order) At UNODA United Nations. Retrieved 4 September 2008. Archived 28 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  26. "Background Note:Brunei Darussalam/Profile:/Foreign Relations". US State Department. Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  27. "Vietnam in ASEAN: Toward Cooperation for Mutual Benefits". ASEAN Secretariat. 2007. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Carolyn L. Gates; Mya Than (2001). ASEAN Enlargement: impacts and implications. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. ISBN 978-981-230-081-2.
  29. "Diplomatic pragmatism: ASEAN's response to the July 1997 coup | Conciliation Resources". c-r.org. Retrieved 27 February 2021.
  30. "Statement by the Secretary-General of ASEAN Welcoming the Kingdom of Cambodia as the Tenth Member State of ASEAN: 30 April 1999, ASEAN Secretariat". ASEAN Secretariat. 2008. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
  31. Risling, David; Ng, Eileen; Megerian, Chris (26 October 2025). "East Timor joins ASEAN in bloc's first expansion since the 1990s". AP News. Retrieved 27 October 2025.
  32. "Forging a New Era: Timor-Leste Admitted into ASEAN". ASEAN. 26 October 2025. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
  33. RP resolution for observer status in UN assembly OK'd, Philippine Daily Inquirer, 13 March 2007. Archived 26 August 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  34. "Philippines to Represent ASEAN in UN Meetings in NY, Geneva". Yahoo! News. 7 March 2007. Archived from the original on 12 March 2007. Retrieved 13 March 2007.
  35. "You are being redirected..." asean.org. 27 July 2024. Retrieved 8 March 2025.
  36. "'Momentous' day for ASEAN as charter comes into force". The Sydney Morning Herald. 15 December 2008. Retrieved 16 December 2008.
  37. Olivia Rondon; Suhartono, Harry (15 December 2008). "ASEAN launches charter under shadow of crisis". Reuters. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 16 December 2008.
  38. "ASEAN charter comes into force". International Herald Tribune. 15 December 2008. Archived from the original on 10 February 2009. Retrieved 12 May 2015 – via Associated Press.
  39. Wong, Chun Han (18 November 2012). "Asean Human-Rights Pledge Leaves Critics Cool". The Wall Street Journal Asia. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  40. "The ASEAN Political-Security Community and Its Dilemmas | The SAGE Handbook of Asian Foreign Policy – Credo Reference". search.credoreference.com. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  41. "ASEAN Chairmanship Role". ASEAN Website. Retrieved 15 January 2025.
  42. "ASEAN Health Sector Efforts in the Prevention, Detection and Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)". asean.org. Retrieved 15 January 2025.
  43. Caballero-Anthony, Mely (June 2005). "SARS in Asia: Crisis, Vulnerabilities, and Regional Responses". Asian Survey. 45 (3): 475–495. doi:10.1525/as.2005.45.3.475.
  44. "Press Release – "Full Marks" for ASEAN in Common Defense Against Influenza A (H1N1), Bangkok, 8 May 2009". ASEAN. 9 May 2009. Archived from the original on 15 June 2021.
  45. "Myanmar coup: ASEAN split over the way forward," 29 March 2021, Deutsche Welle, (same article at Taiwan News) retrieved 7 November 2021
  46. Laksmana, Evan A. (Centre on Asia and Globalisation, National University of Singapore): "ASEAN's Future Will Be Decided in Myanmar," date, Foreign Policy, retrieved 7 November 2021
  47. Williams, Nicola: "Myanmar pushes ASEAN to the brink," 10 June 2021, The Interpreter, Lowy Institute, retrieved 8 November 2021 ("The Myanmar coup presents to ASEAN the most serious threat to the importance of its regional diplomacy since the Cold War.")
  48. Wisnu, Dinna (Indonesian representative to the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights): "Breaking resistance to human rights: Democracies and Rohingya," 6 December 2018, Jakarta Post retrieved December 2018
  49. Wongcha-um, Panu; Johnson, Kay (26 April 2021). "Analysis: On Myanmar, ASEAN pushes boundaries of "non-interference"". Reuters. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  50. Analysis: "Why ASEAN's rebuke of Myanmar's top general matters," 21 October 2021, International Institute for Strategic Studies, retrieved November, 2021
  51. "MSF estimates more than 6,700 Rohingya killed in Myanmar," 13 December 2017, BBC News, retrieved December 2017 (same topic at CBS News[1], The Independent[2], Toronto Star[3], and Australian Broadcasting Corporation[4])
  52. "'Kill All You See': In a First, Myanmar Soldiers Tell of Rohingya Slaughter," 8 September 2020, New York Times, retrieved 7 November 2021
  53. "Study claims an estimated 24,000 Rohingyas murdered in Myanmar" 17 August 2018, Dhaka Tribune retrieved 7 November 2021
  54. "Over 123,000 Rohingya Refugees Flee Violence in Myanmar,", 5 September 2017, Reuters News Service / NBC retrieved September 2017
  55. "'Textbook example of ethnic cleansing': 370,000 Rohingyas flood Bangladesh as crisis worsens,", 12 September 2017, Washington Post retrieved September 2017
  56. "Myanmar 'planned' Rohingya attacks, possibly 'genocide': UN rights chief," Archived 23 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine 19 December 2017, Agence France-Presse in Channel NewsAsia, (also at SBS News [5], retrieved December 2017
  57. "Rohingya Crisis, Suu Kyi Under the Microscope at Southeast Asia Summit," 8 November 2018, Reuters News Service in U.S. News, (same article at New York Times [6]), retrieved November 2018
  58. "ASEAN's Limited Role in Solving the Rohingya Crisis," 12 October 2018, The Diplomat, retrieved 7 November 2021
  59. " The Rohingya Crisis: U.S. Response to the Tragedy in Burma," testimony, 5 October 2017, U.S. State Department, retrieved 7 November 2021
  60. "UN calls for reversal of Myanmar coup and condemns violence," 10 March 2021, Associated Press, (same article at: U.S. News [7] and CTV News (Canada) [8]), retrieved March 2021
  61. "US urges UN Council to press Myanmar to return to democracy.," 29 July 2021, Associated Press, retrieved July 2021
  62. "Commentary: Is ASEAN's snub to Myanmar military the start of a new approach?" 20 October 2021, Channel NewsAsia, retrieved 9 November 2021
  63. Durst, Charles (Eurasia Group): "The Myanmar Coup as an ASEAN Inflection Point" August 2021 (Special Issue), Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, Air University, (also print edition PDF at: [9]), retrieved 9 November 2021
  64. "ASEAN Member States". asean.org. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
  65. "Papua New Guinea asks RP support for Asean membership bid". GMA News and Public Affairs. 30 March 2009. Retrieved 26 January 2013.
  66. Somare seeks PGMA's support for PNG's ASEAN membership bid Archived 6 March 2010 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 8 July 2009
  67. 67.0 67.1 "Ultimate goal is to join ASEAN as a full member". The Financial Express. 5 April 2025. Retrieved 12 July 2025.
  68. "Will Bangladesh join Asean? Maritime arbitration wins favour Dhaka". South China Morning Post. 5 September 2024. Retrieved 17 July 2025.
  69. "Fiji's Foreign Policy White Paper" (PDF). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Fiji.
  70. Suryanarayan, V. (18 October 2022). "The myth and reality of ASEAN unity". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 13 May 2024.
  71. De Silva, Mervyn (1981). "Sri Lanka: ASEAN Operation". India Today. Retrieved 13 May 2024 – via Sri Lanka Guardian.
  72. "ASEAN External relations".
  73. Masilamani, Logan; Peterson, Jimmy (15 October 2014). "The "ASEAN Way": The Structural Underpinnings of Constructive Engagement". Foreign Policy Journal. Archived from the original on 13 May 2015. Retrieved 12 May 2015.
  74. Goh, Gillian (Spring 2003). "The 'ASEAN Way'; Non-Intervention and ASEAN's Role in Conflict Management" (PDF). Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs. 3 (1): 113–18. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2003.
  75. Leviter, Lee (2010). "The ASEAN Charter: ASEAN Failure or Member Failure?". New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 43: 159–210.
  76. "ASEAN Vision 2020" Archived 29 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine 15 December 1997. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
  77. Julio Amador; Joycee A. Teodoro (2 May 2014). "A united region: The ASEAN Community 2015". Rappler. Archived from the original on 10 May 2015. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  78. "Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II)". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  79. "About ASEAN". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 16 May 2025. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
  80. Fact Sheet ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) (PDF). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. June 2013. ISBN 978-602-7643-49-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  81. Fact Sheet ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) (PDF). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. June 2013. ISBN 978-602-7643-50-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  82. Fact Sheet of ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) (PDF). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. June 2013. ISBN 978-602-7643-51-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  83. The Association of Academies of Sciences in Asia (2011). Towards A Sustainable Asia: Environment and Climate Change. Beijing: Science Press.
  84. "TODAY Online – Countries must work together to deal with shared problems: PM Lee". Government of Singapore. Archived from the original on 26 November 2015. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  85. "Cebu declaration on the acceleration of the establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015". Archived from the original on 17 June 2015. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  86. ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint (PDF). Jakarta: Association of Southeast Asian Nations. June 2009. p. 20. ISBN 978-602-8411-06-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  87. 87.0 87.1 87.2 87.3 "Annex 10: ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting: Concept Paper on Establishing ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration" (PDF). ADMM. ASEAN. 19 May 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
  88. 88.0 88.1 88.2 Ben-Ari, Guy; Raghavan, Sneha (7 September 2011). "DIIG Current Issues No. 25: ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration" (PDF). CSIS. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2024. Retrieved 26 October 2025.
  89. "2011 JOINT DECLARATION OF THE ASEAN DEFENCE MINISTERS ON STRENGTHENING DEFENCE COOPERATION OF ASEAN IN THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY TO FACE NEW CHALLENGES". asean.org. Archived from the original on 9 January 2015.
  90. "3rd ASEAN Defence Industry Collaboration Workshop". Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  91. Abuza, Zachary (11 September 2014). "Fear Us: Military Expenditures in Southeast Asia". Indo-Pacific Review. Archived from the original on 9 January 2015. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  92. J. Dowdy; D. Chinn; M. Mancini; J. Ng (February 2014). "Southeast Asia: The next growth opportunity in defence McKinsey – Innovation Campus Aerospace and Defence Practice".
  93. "ASEANAPOL, The Urgency to Keep The Region Safe – ICOAS". icoas.ppispanyol.org. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 8 September 2018.
  94. 94.0 94.1 Understanding the ASEAN Economic Community; A Primer (PDF) (1st ed.). Department of Trade and Industry (Philippines). 28 February 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  95. "ASEAN Economic Community – ASEAN – ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY". Archived from the original on 3 September 2014. Retrieved 6 September 2014.
  96. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint (PDF). Jakarta: Association of Southeast Asian Nations. January 2008. p. 56. ISBN 978-979-3496-77-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  97. Rising as One: The Filipino Nation Towards the ASEAN Economic Integration (PDF). Local Government Academy of the Philippines. 2013. p. 23. ISBN 978-971-0576-41-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 July 2014. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  98. 98.0 98.1 98.2 Xianbai, Ji (24 September 2014). "Why the ASEAN Economic Community Will Struggle". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 9 May 2015. Retrieved 12 May 2015.
  99. 99.0 99.1 Edmund Sim (25 May 2012). "AEC Blog: Grading the ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard". Archived from the original on 15 August 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  100. 100.0 100.1 Das, Sanchita Basu (June 2012). "A critical look at the ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard". East Asia Forum. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  101. ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard: Charting Progress Towards Regional Economic Integration (PDF). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. March 2010. ISBN 978-602-8411-35-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  102. ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard (PDF). Jakarka: ASEAN Secretariat. March 2012. ISBN 978-602-8411-96-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  103. 103.0 103.1 103.2 Overland, Indra; Sagbakken, Haakon Fossum; Chan, Hoy-Yen; Merdekawati, Monika; Suryadi, Beni; Utama, Nuki Agya; Vakulchuk, Roman (December 2021). "The ASEAN climate and energy paradox". Energy and Climate Change. 2 100019. doi:10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100019. hdl:11250/2734506. ISSN 2666-2787.
  104. 104.0 104.1 104.2 Chee, Wan Choy; Ho, Wai Shin; Hashim, Haslenda; Lim, Lek Keng; Muis, Zarina Ab; Nizamuddin, Arfah Diyanah; Wong, Keng Yinn; Overland, Indra; Shidiq, Muhammad; Pradnyaswari, Indira (November 2025). "Renewable energy trade among the ASEAN countries and the road to net-zero carbon emissions". Energy Strategy Reviews. 62 101878. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101878.
  105. 105.0 105.1 Manila Bulletin. "S&P cites moves by Philippine banks". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved 14 June 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  106. 106.0 106.1 Towards ASEAN Financial Integration
  107. "Food Security". World Health Organisation. Archived from the original on 17 September 2015. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  108. Desker, Barry; Caballero-Anthony, Mely; Teng, Paul (October 2013). Thought/Issues Paper on ASEAN Food Security: Towards a more Comprehensive Framework (PDF). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  109. Overland, Indra et al. (2017) Impact of Climate Change on ASEAN International Affairs: Risk and Opportunity Multiplier, Archived 28 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and Myanmar Institute of International and Strategic Studies (MISIS).
  110. Bello, Amelia L. "Ensuring Food Security—A Case for ASEAN Integration". Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development. 2 (1, 2). ISSN 1656-4383. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  111. "Strengthening Food Security for ASEAN Citizens: ASEAN – U.S. Cooperation on Food Security initiative "MARKET" Project Reduces Market Volatility through Increased Regional Trade". Archived from the original on 29 April 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  112. ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint (PDF). Jakarta: Association of Southeast Asian Nations. June 2009. p. 32. ISBN 978-602-8411-07-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  113. "Real GDP growth". 11 January 2025. Retrieved 19 January 2025.
  114. "datamapper/profile/IDN DataMapper: Indonesia". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  115. "datamapper/profile/SGP DataMapper: Singapore". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  116. "datamapper/profile/THA DataMapper: Thailand". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  117. "datamapper/profile/PHL DataMapper: Philippines". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  118. "datamapper/profile/VNM DataMapper: Vietnam". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  119. "datamapper/profile/MYS DataMapper: Malaysia". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  120. "datamapper/profile/MMR DataMapper: Myanmar". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  121. "datamapper/profile/KHM DataMapper: Cambodia". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  122. "datamapper/profile/LAO DataMapper: Lao P.D.R." International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  123. "datamapper/profile/BRN DataMapper: Brunei Darussalam". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  124. "datamapper/profile/BRN DataMapper: Timor-Leste". International Monetary Fund. 11 January 2025. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
  125. 125.0 125.1 "Trade & Customs Singapore: Introduction to ASEAN Economic Community" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 February 2012. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  126. "ASEAN economies past and future". The Jakarta Post. 29 July 2011. Archived from the original on 12 May 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2011.
  127. 127.0 127.1 "Agreement on the Common Effective Preferential Tariff Scheme for the ASEAN Free Trade Area, Singapore, 28 Jan 1992". Asean.org. Archived from the original on 14 April 2009. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  128. "Overview". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 22 October 2008. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  129. "ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)". Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Malaysia). 24 April 2013. Archived from the original on 20 August 2014. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  130. "Economic Zones in the ASEAN" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  131. "ASEAN countries among world's outperforming emerging economies: Report". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  132. 132.0 132.1 Gronewold, Nathanial (20 November 2019). "Booming Southeast Asia's dirty secret: Coal". E&E News. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 22 November 2019 – via Climatewire.
  133. "The 6th ASEAN Energy Outlook". ASEAN Centre for Energy. 19 November 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  134. "Legal Instruments". asean.org.
  135. Menon, Jayant (14 July 2017). "Will 2025 be the final deadline for the ASEAN Economic Community?".
  136. "ASEAN Community Vision 2045" (PDF). 26 May 2025.
  137. "ASEAN Economic Community Strategic Plan 2026–2030 of the ASEAN Community Vision 2045" (PDF). May 2025.
  138. "ASEAN feared to become multinational companies market only". Anatara News. 10 November 2011. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 10 November 2011.
  139. "ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services (1995)". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 26 December 2009. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  140. "Overview". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 6 February 2011. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  141. Buranasomphop, Duangkamol (14 June 2014). "Asean 2015: Free movement of labour". AEC Tourism Thailand. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
  142. "Concern over free flow of labour after AEC starts". The Nation. 13 July 2014. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
  143. "Why the AEC in 2015 Will Lead to Few Changes in Thailand". Thai-Norwegian Chamber of Commerce. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 12 May 2015.
  144. Anna Suci Perwitasari (13 June 2012). "Indonesia belum akan masuk Asean Linkage". Archived from the original on 10 December 2014. Retrieved 17 January 2014.
  145. 145.0 145.1 145.2 "Asean Single Aviation Market". Straits Times. Singapore. 2 February 2008. Archived from the original on 9 December 2008. Retrieved 26 September 2008.
  146. 146.0 146.1 "Singaporean PM urges ASEAN to liberalise aviation". chinaview.cn. Xinhua News Agency. 1 November 2007. Archived from the original on 11 December 2008. Retrieved 26 September 2008.
  147. Kaur, Karamjit (25 September 2008). "Tiger offers 50,000 free seats". Straits Times. Singapore. Archived from the original on 27 September 2008. Retrieved 26 September 2008.
  148. "Three-quarters of a million more seats and counting- KL-Singapore benefits from liberalisation". Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation. 28 September 2008. Archived from the original on 5 April 2006. Retrieved 26 September 2008.
  149. 149.0 149.1 Baby Steps to a Common Currency
  150. Asian Currency Unit
  151. Mundell, Robert (February 2003). "Prospects for an Asian currency area". Journal of Asian Economics. 14 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/S1049-0078(02)00236-1.
  152. Prospects for a Single Asian Currency
  153. Cost and Benefits for A Common Currency in ASEAN
  154. "The ASEAN Economic Community's Progress". InvestAsian. 15 January 2015. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  155. "ASEAN to complete free trade agreements by 2013". Forbes. 26 August 2007. Archived from the original on 12 October 2008. Retrieved 27 August 2007.
  156. Ong, Christine (27 August 2007). "ASEAN confident of concluding FTAs with partners by 2013". Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved 27 August 2007.[dead link]
  157. "ASEAN Charter". ASEAN. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2016.
  158. "CEBU DECLARATION ON EAST ASIAN ENERGY SECURITY". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 4 March 2016.
  159. "ASEAN, Australia and New Zealand Free Trade Agreement – NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade". Mfat.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 15 April 2009. Retrieved 21 May 2009.
  160. "Asean, Australia, New Zealand Sign Free-Trade Deal (Update1)". Bloomberg. 27 February 2009. Archived from the original on 2 December 2010. Retrieved 21 May 2009.
  161. "Welcome to Singapore FTA Network". Fta.gov.sg. Archived from the original on 9 December 2008. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  162. "India – trade value with ASEAN countries 2016 | Statistic". Statista. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 29 August 2018.
  163. "Siew calls for pragmatic approach to ASEAN ties". The Taipei Times. Taiwan (ROC). 12 October 2008. Archived from the original on 11 December 2008. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  164. "ASEAN+6 trade bloc in the making". Investvine.com. 23 February 2013. Archived from the original on 28 March 2013. Retrieved 24 February 2013.
  165. "Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)". Archived from the original on 29 October 2014. Retrieved 29 October 2014.
  166. "Factsheet on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2013. Retrieved 29 October 2014.
  167. Regional integration: the ASEAN vision in 2020 by Rosabel B. Guerrero; Director, Department of Economic Statistics, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, Manila, Philippines.
  168. Prentice, Chris; Ananthalakshmi, A. (7 February 2019). "Long, strange trip: How U.S. ethanol reaches Taiwan tariff-free". reuters.com. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
  169. Do, Thang Nam; Burke, Paul J. (9 May 2022). "Is ASEAN ready to move to multilateral cross-border electricity trade?". Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 64: 110–125. doi:10.1111/apv.12343.
  170. Nian, Victor; Mignacca, Benito; Locatelli, Giorgio (August 2022). "Policies toward net-zero: Benchmarking the economic competitiveness of nuclear against wind and solar energy". Applied Energy. 320 119275. Bibcode:2022ApEn..32019275N. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119275. hdl:11311/1227558.
  171. Anjaiah, Veeramalla (27 September 2011). "Perfect 10 Paradise: ASEAN tourist industry is booming with intra-ASEAN travelers". The Jakarta Post. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  172. Thoeun, In. "Tourism Cooperation Towards AEC" (PDF). Kingdom of Cambodia, Ministry of Commerce. Workshop on ASEAN Economic Community Outreach. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 November 2014. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  173. "Tourism Statistics – ASEAN | ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY". ASEAN | ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
  174. "The ASEAN Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2012" (PDF). World Economic Forum. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 August 2017.
  175. "Tourism | ASEAN Investment". Archived from the original on 29 October 2014. Retrieved 1 November 2014.
  176. ASEAN Tourism Marketing Strategy (ATMS) 2012–2015 (PDF). Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretariat Public Outreach and Civil Society Division. March 2012. ISBN 978-602-8411-97-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  177. "The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013" (PDF). World Economic Forum. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 November 2019. Retrieved 1 November 2014.
  178. "About". China-ASEAN Investment Cooperation Fund Official Website. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
  179. Chan, Cathy (1 December 2011). "China-ASEAN Investment Fund Plans To Deploy $500M In 2012". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved 4 February 2013.
  180. 180.0 180.1 180.2 "China-ASEAN Fund on Investment Cooperation:Summary of Proposed Investment". IFC Official Website. International Finance Corporation, part of the World Bank. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  181. 181.0 181.1 181.2 181.3 181.4 181.5 Loh, Dylan M.H. (2024). China's Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-1-5036-3820-4.
  182. "Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) | Treaties & Regimes | NTI". The Nuclear Threat Initiative. Archived from the original on 13 April 2019. Retrieved 3 March 2018.
  183. "ASEAN-UN Partnership". Asia-Pacific Regional Coordination Mechanism. 20 December 2016. Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  184. "An Overview of ASEAN-United Nations Cooperation – ASEAN – ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY". Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2017.
  185. "Intergovernmental Organizations". un.org. Archived from the original on 23 May 2017. Retrieved 28 April 2017.
  186. 186.0 186.1 ASEAN Structure, ASEAN Primer Archived 22 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  187. ASEAN-CER Meeting: Trade is the Key Driver in Fostering Growth Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine, 31 August 2012, ASEAN Secretariat News
  188. "The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and BRICS Should Combine to Form a Single Cohesive Group – Eurasia Future". Eurasia Future. 7 June 2018. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  189. "Shanghai Cooperation Organisation | SCO". eng.sectsco.org. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  190. "Interview: Cambodian FM says Cambodia can bridge SCO and ASEAN – Xinhua | English.news.cn". xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  191. "SCO-ASEAN Cooperation for Mutual Interests". en.sco-russia.ru. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  192. "Overview of ASEAN-China Dialogue Relations" (PDF). ASEAN Secretariat Information Paper. April 2017. pp. 3–5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 August 2018. Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  193. "Taking Asean-China ties to the next level". The Straits Times. 15 September 2017. Archived from the original on 25 August 2018. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
  194. "First ASEAN-China maritime field training exercise to be held in October: MINDEF". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
  195. "ASEAN-Australia Special Summit ends with commitments on cybersecurity, free trade". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  196. Trade, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and. "Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)". New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  197. "ASEAN seeks to strengthen trade relations with partners – Xinhua | English.news.cn". xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  198. Stolarchuk, Jewel. "Reflecting on the ASEAN–Australian relationship". The Independent. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  199. ASEAN Ministerial Meetings, ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 13 March 2007. Archived 2 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  200. Asean.org, ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 16 March 2007. Archived 22 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  201. "Malaysians have had enough of haze woes". The Malaysian Bar. Retrieved 13 March 2007.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  202. About Us Archived 25 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine, ASEAN Regional Forum official website . Retrieved 12 June 2006.
  203. "ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)". Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Government of Australia. Archived from the original on 27 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  204. Lay Hwee Yeo (2003). Asia and Europe: the development and different dimensions of ASEM. Routledge (UK). ISBN 978-0-415-30697-3.
  205. "Ukraine minister urges ASEAN bloc to stop Russia's 'hunger games'". Al Jazeera. 12 November 2022.
  206. "Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea". Global Conflict Tracker. Retrieved 25 July 2022.
  207. "Stiffening the ASEAN spine in the South China Sea". lowyinstitute.org. Retrieved 25 July 2022.
  208. Cochrane, Joe (10 September 2017). "Indonesia, Long on Sidelines, Starts to Confront China's Territorial Claims". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
  209. 209.0 209.1 Wang, Frances Yaping (2024). The Art of State Persuasion: China's Strategic Use of Media in Interstate Disputes. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-775751-2.
  210. Gerstl, Alfred (2023). "China in its Immediate Neighborhood". In Kironska, Kristina; Turscanyi, Richard Q. (eds.). Contemporary China: a New Superpower?. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-03-239508-1.
  211. "Lesser known border tensions between Cambodia and Vietnam". theaseanpost.com. 9 April 2018. Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  212. Flores, Helen; Romero, Alexis (27 February 2016). "Binay to pursue territorial claim to Sabah if elected". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  213. "Marcos order: Destabilize, take Sabah". Philippine Daily Inquirer. 2 April 2000. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2015.
  214. Yiswaree Palansamy (15 March 2016). "Citing militant threats on Sabah, BN MP tells Putrajaya to cut diplomatic ties to Manila". The Malay Mail. Archived from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  215. Naidu, Sumisha (2 March 2016). "Malaysia asks Philippines not to threaten ties over Sabah claim". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  216. East Asia Economic Caucus. ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved 14 March 2007. Archived 2 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  217. 217.0 217.1 Asiaviews.org[usurped], Whither East Asia? Retrieved 14 March 2007.
  218. UNT.edu, Asia's Reaction to NAFTA, Nancy J. Hamilton. CRS – Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 14 March 2007.
  219. IHT.com, Japan Straddles Fence on Issue of East Asia Caucus. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 14 March 2007. Archived 12 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  220. 220.0 220.1 ASEAN Plus Three – History and Development
  221. "The Rise of China and Community Building in East Asia"[permanent dead link], Zhang Xiaoming, ASIAN Perspective, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 129–148.
  222. "ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation". Archived from the original on 4 February 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  223. Stubbs, R. "ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?" n.d. web. 12 May 2012.
  224. atinder. "Welcome To The World Of Smokeless Cigarettes!" (PDF). E-Cigarette Review Council. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  225. "Secretaries-General of ASEAN-China Centre, ASEAN-Japan Centre and ASEAN-Korea Centre Held 18th Informal Meeting". Archived from the original on 23 September 2023. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
  226. Urata, Shujiro (February 2008). "An ASEAN+6 Economic Partnership: Significance and Tasks" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  227. Kawai, Masahiro; Wignaraja, Ganeshan. "ASEAN+3 or ASEAN+6: Which Way Forward?" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  228. 228.0 228.1 Tang, See Kit (29 August 2018). "Conclusion for Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership 'finally in sight': PM Lee". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 16 September 2018. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  229. "ASEAN+6 as a step towards an Asian Economic Community". East Asia Forum. 15 May 2009. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  230. "TPP, RCEP, FTAAP – a user's guide to alphabet soup of trade deals". The Straits Times. 20 November 2016. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
  231. 中方:无意追求对印度贸易顺差 欢迎印度尽早加入Rcep_滚动新闻_中国政府网. 中国政府网_中央人民政府门户网站.
  232. Hsieh, Pasha L. (9 September 2019). "Rethinking non-recognition: Taiwan's new pivot to ASEAN and the one-China policy". Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 33 (2). Informa UK Limited: 204–228. doi:10.1080/09557571.2019.1657796. ISSN 0955-7571. S2CID 203301979. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  233. ASEAN Secretariat. ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution. Extracted 12 October 2006 Archived 2 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  234. "Travel Advise for Swiss Abroad in Singapore (German)". Archived from the original on 25 October 2015. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
  235. "Travel advise for Swiss abroad in Malaysia". Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
  236. "Travel advise for Swiss abroad in Indonesia". Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 19 September 2015.
  237. "Years after 2,500 tonnes of Canadian trash landed in Manila, Philippines demanding we take it back". National Post. Retrieved 4 March 2016.
  238. "Country Rankings". Global Forest Loss. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 2 March 2015.
  239. Jambeck, Jenna (13 February 2015). "Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean". Science. 347 (6223): 768–771. Bibcode:2015Sci...347..768J. doi:10.1126/science.1260352. PMID 25678662. S2CID 206562155.
  240. "Mammal species, threatened". World Bank. UN Environmental Forum; World Conservation Monitoring Centre; International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2014. Archived from the original on 26 June 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2015.
  241. "Fish species, threatened". The World Bank. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 24 June 2015.
  242. "Plant species (higher), threatened". The World Bank. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 24 June 2015.
  243. 243.0 243.1 Fazeli, Reza; Do, Thang Nam; Overland, Indra; Pradnyaswari, Indira (November 2025). "Southeast Asia faces high stranded asset risk from coal power investments". Energy Strategy Reviews. 62 101971. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101971.
  244. Overland, Indra; Seah, Sharon (2024). "Can Asia's climate leader please step forward?". Asian Politics & Policy. 16 (3): 429–449. doi:10.1111/aspp.12754. ISSN 1943-0787.
  245. 245.0 245.1 "An Overview of Spatial Policy in Vietnam". mlit.go.jp. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
  246. 246.0 246.1 Do, Thang Nam; Burke, Paul J.; Nguyen, Hoang Nam; Overland, Indra; Suryadi, Beni; Swandaru, Akbar; Yurnaidi, Zulfikar (1 December 2021). "Vietnam's solar and wind power success: Policy implications for the other ASEAN countries". Energy for Sustainable Development. 65: 1–11. Bibcode:2021ESusD..65....1D. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2021.09.002. hdl:1885/248804. ISSN 0973-0826.
  247. ASEAN's Digital and Energy Transition: A Competitiveness Analysis (PDF). Singapore: Asia Competitiveness Institute, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. 2024. pp. 28–30. Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  248. 248.0 248.1 248.2 Do, Thang Nam (May 2024). "Insider perspectives on Southeast Asiaʼs clean energy transition". Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. 11 (2) e390. doi:10.1002/app5.390. ISSN 2050-2680.
  249. Do, Thang Nam; Burke, Paul J.; Nguyen, Hoang Nam; Overland, Indra; Suryadi, Beni; Swandaru, Akbar; Yurnaidi, Zulfikar (December 2021). "Vietnam's solar and wind power success: Policy implications for the other ASEAN countries". Energy for Sustainable Development. 65: 1–11. Bibcode:2021ESusD..65....1D. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2021.09.002. hdl:1885/248804.
  250. Do, Thang Nam; Burke, Paul J. (1 June 2024). "Phasing out coal power in two major Southeast Asian thermal coal economies: Indonesia and Vietnam". Energy for Sustainable Development. 80 101451. Bibcode:2024ESusD..8001451D. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2024.101451. hdl:1885/317223. ISSN 0973-0826.
  251. "ASEAN AIPF Opened by President, PLN Presents Green Enabling Supergrid". jcnnewswire.com (Press release). Retrieved 25 May 2024.
  252. 252.0 252.1 "ASEANWEB – Education." ASEANWEB – Education. N.p., 2009. Web. 23 October 2012.
  253. ASEAN. "ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting". Association of Southeast Asian Nations. ASEAN Secretariat. 2012. "ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting (ASED)". Archived from the original on 11 February 2015. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  254. "ASEAN University Network/Board Member". Aun-sec.org. Archived from the original on 31 July 2008. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  255. "ASEAN University Network/Agreement". Aun-sec.org. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  256. "About the ASEAN Scholarships". Ministry of Education Singapore. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 1 May 2017.
  257. Keong, Lee Chu. "Knowledge Management: Some Definitions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 July 2013. Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  258. "Australia for ASEAN scholarships". Australian Government – Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  259. Rowlands, Lyndal. "Indonesia's Jakarta now the world's largest city, Tokyo falls to third: UN". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  260. Seasia.co. "From Summit to Secretariat: Why is Jakarta the Capital of ASEAN?". Seasia.co. Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  261. Kompas, Tim Harian (10 April 2019). "DKI Jakarta juga Ibu Kota ASEAN". Kompas.id (in Bahasa Indonesia). Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  262. "ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2020" (PDF). Retrieved 20 January 2021.
  263. "ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2020". 30 December 2020. Retrieved 20 January 2021.
  264. "ASEAN: KEY SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS" (PDF). ASEAN Stats. 2017.
  265. 265.0 265.1 ASEAN Sustainable Urbanisation Report (PDF) (Report). ASEAN Secretariat. December 2022. Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  266. Tyson, Peter; Fu, Congbin; Fuchs, Roland; Lebel, Louis; Mitra, A. P.; Odada, Eric; Perry, John; Steffen, Will; Virji, Hassan, eds. (2002). "Global-Regional Linkages in the Earth System". SpringerLink. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56228-0. ISBN 978-3-642-62693-7.
  267. Review, Asia Insurance. "Cover Story - AEC: Set in Motion - AEC: Southeast Asia welcomes a new economic dawn". Asia Insurance Review. Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  268. Yinuo (18 November 2025). "Press Release | Cities are home to 45 per cent of the global population, with megacities continuing to grow, UN report finds". United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 28 December 2025.
  269. Jatayu, Anoraga; Rustiadi, Ernan; Juanda, Bambang; Pribadi, Didit Okta (11 April 2023). "Metric-Based Approach for Quantifying Urban Expansion Impact on Urban Form Changes in the JBMUR South Conurbation Corridor". Land. 12 (4): 864. Bibcode:2023Land...12..864J. doi:10.3390/land12040864.
  270. "ASEAN Heritage Parks". Biodiversity Information Sharing Service. ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity (ACB). Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 25 June 2015.
  271. Lehmann, Jean-Pierre. "What's Next For ASEAN". Forbes. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  272. Zein, Subhan; Stroupe, Richmond (2 September 2017). "English and language-in-education policy in the ASEAN Plus Three Forum". Asian Englishes. 19 (3): 193–196. doi:10.1080/13488678.2017.1389061.
  273. "ASEAN Ministers Responsible for Information (AMRI)". Archived from the original on 27 June 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  274. ASEAN Communication Master Plan – ASEAN: A Community of Opportunities (PDF). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat; Public Outreach and Civil Society Division. October 2014. ISBN 978-602-0980-02-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  275. "Opening Remarks by Secretary-General of ASEAN, H.E. Le Luong Minh at the Launching of the ASEAN Communication Master Plan" (PDF). ASEAN. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  276. "ASEAN Promotes Use of Social Media". Philippine Information Agency. Retrieved 1 October 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  277. "Deepening ASEAN Media Cooperation Within and Beyond". Media Development Authority. Archived from the original on 10 May 2012. Retrieved 31 August 2012.
  278. Media Development Authority. "New Media Portal to Enhance ASEAN'S COCI Website and Offer Access to the Region's Media Industry". Archived from the original on 6 February 2011. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
  279. "Launch of the ASEAN NewsMaker Project: Students to promote cross-cultural understanding by creating video clips for ASEAN Media Portal, Singapore, 2 June 2009". asean.org. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
  280. "11th ASEAN Digital Broadcasting Meeting". ASEAN Secretariat News. Archived from the original on 30 May 2013. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
  281. "Guidelines for ASEAN Digital Switch-Over" (PDF). ASEAN. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  282. Phataranawik, Phatarawadee (22 June 2019). "Asean's message to the world takes musical flight". The Nation. Archived from the original on 22 June 2019. Retrieved 22 June 2019.
  283. southeastasiansportsnews.blogspot.com/2018/10/42nd-southeast-asia-seasa-shooting.html
  284. "This is why ASEAN needs a common visa". World Economic Forum. June 2016. Archived from the original on 25 June 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2018.
  285. "ASEAN bloc must be tapped". theaustralian.com.au. Archived from the original on 24 April 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2018.
  286. Lee, Sze Ming (5 July 2018). "ASEAN in the Changing Asia Pacific Security Order". Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  287. Haas, Michael (1997). "Asean's Pivotal Role in Asian-Pacific Regional Cooperation". Global Governance. 3 (3): 329–348. doi:10.1163/19426720-00303009. JSTOR 27800175.
  288. "World leaders praised the Philippines on how it hosted the ASEAN Summit". untvweb.com. UNTV News. Archived from the original on 15 June 2018. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  289. "Russia supports increasing ASEAN's global influence". news.teletrader.com.[permanent dead link]
  290. "The World to Come: ASEAN's Political and Economic Prospects in the New Century". asean.org. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2018.
  291. "Singapore Institute of International Affairs | A think tank for thinking people". siiaonline.org. Archived from the original on 2 December 2017. Retrieved 26 November 2017.
  292. "What Are the Opportunities for ASEAN?". Yale Insights. 14 July 2017. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  293. "ASEAN, an important regional and global partner". VOV.vn. 5 August 2017. Archived from the original on 7 October 2017. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  294. "ASEAN's rise in the global economy". World Economic Forum. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  295. 295.0 295.1 Elek, Andrew (30 September 2005). "The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years, chapter 5: Back to Canberra: Founding APEC". Archived from the original on 29 March 2016. Retrieved 16 September 2018 – via pecc.org.
  296. 296.0 296.1 "India at the East Asia Summit". mea.gov.in. Ministry of External Affairs, India. August 2018. Archived from the original on 23 February 2019. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
  297. "Trade agreements are in ASEAN's best interests". EastAsiaForum.org. 6 February 2016. Archived from the original on 9 March 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  298. Devare, Sudhir. "ASEAN's role in Asia Pacific: In the driver's seat or just a back-seat driver?". smu.edu.sg. Singapore Management University. Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  299. "History". apec.org. Archived from the original on 4 March 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2018.
  300. "Understanding ASEAN free trade agreements". aseanbriefing.com. Archived from the original on 27 January 2019. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  301. Hew, Denis (2005). Roadmap to an Asean Economic Community. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. ISBN 978-981-230-347-9.
  302. "World leaders in Manila: Key events at ASEAN". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2018 – via philstar.com.
  303. "ADB president calls for building Asian economic integration". peacejournalism.com. Peace Journalism. 3 January 2007. Archived from the original on 17 July 2011. Retrieved 3 April 2007.
  304. "Japan Cancels Burma Grant". 17 October 2007. Archived from the original on 14 November 2007. Retrieved 18 October 2007 – via Associated Press.
  305. Silp, Sai (15 February 2007). "Burma an Issue in Asean-EU Trade Talks". The Irawaddy News Magazine Online Edition. Retrieved 4 March 2007 – via irrawaddy.org.[dead link]
  306. "Philippines won't join UN condemnation of attacks on Rohingya". philstar.com. 18 November 2017. Archived from the original on 25 December 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
  307. "Malaysian foreign minister says ASEAN is no 'talk shop'". Asian Political News. 5 December 2005. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  308. "BBC Country/International Organisation Profile: Association of Southeast Asian Nations". BBC News. 11 January 2007. Archived from the original on 15 March 2007. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  309. McLean, John. "Will ASEAN's New Charter Bring Greater Cooperation?". Development Asia. Asian Development Bank. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2015.
  310. Huxley, Tim (2010). "ASEAN's Mixed Bag". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 28 August 2012. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  311. "About 100 militants stage protest vs Asean Summit in Cebu". GMANews.tv. 13 January 2007. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2007.
  312. "ASEAN protests in Cebu will also underscore massive opposition to Charter Change". Kilusang Mayo Uno. 7 December 2006. Archived from the original on 9 October 2007 – via kilusangmayouno.org.
  313. Maierbrugger, Arno (30 January 2016). "Corruption still widespread in Southeast Asia". Investvine.com. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 3 March 2016.
  314. K., Reid (27 January 2015). "Southeast Asia is Not Ready for AEC". InvestAsian. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  315. "ASEAN people unaware of 2015 economic integration". ABS-CBNNews.com. 10 June 2013. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2014 – via Reuters.
  316. "PH may not be ready for ASEAN integration – expert". Rappler.com. 11 September 2012. Archived from the original on 19 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  317. 317.0 317.1 "News Analysis: ASEAN economic integration in 2015 draws conflicting views in Phl". The Philippine Star. 24 April 2014. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 24 November 2014.
  318. McNutt, Thomas H (2014). ASEAN Business Outlook Survey 2015 (PDF). Singapore: US Chamber of Commerce. p. 56. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  319. Severino, Rodolfo C (31 January 2014). "Let's be honest about what ASEAN can and cannot do". East Asia Forum. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  320. "Import-Export Department". Movetoasia. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 10 July 2020.
  321. "New ASEAN community offers export opportunities". Vietnam News. 19 April 2014. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 12 May 2015.
  322. Maierbrugger, Arno (1 October 2014). "Cambodia May Miss Date For ASEAN Economic Community". Investvine. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 12 May 2015.
  323. "AEC Blueprint 2025 Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine," The ASEAN Secretariat, November 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2019.
  324. "Tackling Non-Tariff Barriers in ASEAN". Asian Trade Centre. 25 June 2019. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 25 June 2019.
  325. "Non-tariff barriers in ASEAN and their elimination from a business perspective Archived 30 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine," The Asian Trade Centre, 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2019.
  326. ASEAN (2008). "The ASEAN Charter" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
  327. Nasu, Hitoshi (2019). The legal authority of ASEAN as a security institution. Rob McLaughlin, Donald Rothwell, See Seng Tan. Cambridge, United Kingdom. ISBN 978-1-108-66951-1. OCLC 1100418969.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  328. ASEAN (2009). "ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 March 2016.
  329. ReCAAP (2020). "ReCAAP ISC Half Yearly Report 2020" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 July 2020.
  330. ASEAN (2020). "JOINT STATEMENT FOURTEENTH ASEAN MINISTERIAL MEETING ON TRANSNATIONAL CRIME (14th AMMTC)Cohesive and Responsive ASEAN against Transnational Crime" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 February 2021.
  331. ASEAN. "ASEAN Regional Forum Work Plan For Maritime Security 2018–2020" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 May 2020.
  332. 332.0 332.1 Haward, Marcus (3 July 2014). "Editorial". Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs. 6 (3): 117–118. doi:10.1080/18366503.2014.954300. ISSN 1836-6503. S2CID 220296737.
  333. Putra, Bama; Darwis, Darwis; Burhanuddin, Burhanuddin (March 2019). "ASEAN Political-Security Community: Challenges of establishing regional security in the Southeast Asia". Journal of International Studies. 12 (1): 33–49. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-1/2. ISSN 2071-8330.
  334. Southgate, Laura (2015). "Piracy in the Malacca Strait: Can ASEAN Respond?". The Diplomat.
  335. Graham Gerard Ong, ed. (2006). Piracy, maritime terrorism and securing the Malacca Straits. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. ISBN 981-230-391-X. OCLC 77502405.
  336. Bhattacharyya, Anushree (December 2010). "Understanding Security in Regionalism Framework: ASEAN Maritime Security in Perspective". Maritime Affairs:Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India. 6 (2): 72–89. doi:10.1080/09733159.2010.559786. ISSN 0973-3159. S2CID 109034519.
  337. Haacke, Jürgen (September 2009). "The ASEAN Regional Forum: from dialogue to practical security cooperation?". Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 22 (3): 427–449. doi:10.1080/09557570903104057. ISSN 0955-7571. S2CID 144870373.
  338. 338.0 338.1 Andrew, Ivan Mario (2017). "Developing Defence Cooperation in Maintaining ASEAN's Resilience in Managing Conflict and Unconventional Threat". The Journal of Defence and Security. 8: 14–27.
  339. Pearson, Elaine (4 March 2024). ""On Human Rights, ASEAN Is Woefully Inadequate and Impotent"". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 24 April 2024.
  340. Kurlantzick, Joshua (29 August 2022). ""ASEAN's Complete Failure on Myanmar: A Short Overview"". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 28 April 2024.
  341. "Thailand: Military coups and political instability". BBC News. 23 May 2014. Retrieved 28 July 2025.
  342. Chachavalpongpun, Pavin (2022). "Thailand's Military and ASEAN's Security Dilemma". Asian Survey. 62 (4): 601–623. doi:10.1525/as.2022.62.4.601 ( (inactive $1) 27 October 2025).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of October 2025 (link)

Further reading[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]

Organisations

ASEAN Summits

ASEAN organisations

ASEAN related websites

Template:Eastern world Template:Regional organizations