Freedom of the press in India

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia
Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We need your support to keep the flame of knowledge burning bright! Our hosting server bill is due on June 1st, and without your help, Bharatpedia faces the risk of shutdown. We've come a long way together in exploring and celebrating our rich heritage. Now, let's unite to ensure Bharatpedia continues to be a beacon of knowledge for generations to come. Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Together, let's preserve and share the essence of Bharat.

Thank you for being part of the Bharatpedia family!
Please scan the QR code on the right click here to donate.

0%

   

transparency: ₹0 raised out of ₹100,000 (0 supporter)



Freedom of the press in India is legally protected by the Amendment to the constitution of India,[1] while the sovereignty, national integrity, and moral principles are generally protected by the law of India to maintain a hybrid legal system for independent journalism. In India, media bias or misleading information is restricted under the certain constitutional amendments as described by the country's constitution. The media crime is covered by the Indian Penal Code (IPC) which is applicable to all substantive aspects of criminal law.

Nevertheless, freedom of the press in India is subject to certain restrictions, such as defamation law, a lack of protection for whistleblowers, barriers to information access and constraints caused by public and government hostility to journalists. The press, including print, television, radio, and internet are nominally amended to express their concerns under the selected provisions such as Article-19 (which became effective from 1950), though it states freedom of "occupation, trade or business" and "freedom of speech and expression" without naming "press" in clause "a" and "g".[2][3][4][5] The article allows a journalist or media industries to cover any story and bring it to the audiences without impacting the national security of the country.[6]

To protect the intellectual, moral, and fundamental rights of the citizens, the government has taken several countermeasures to combat circulating fake news and restricting objectionable contents across the multiple platforms. The law of India prohibits spreading or publishing fake news through social or mass media, and could lead to imprisonment of a journalist or newspaper ban.[7][8]

Global ranking[edit]

In 2020, India's press freedom rank dropped to 142 out of 180 countries in Press Freedom Index, an annual ranking of countries published by Reporters Without Borders (RWB), an international non-governmental organization dedicated to safeguard the right to freedom of information. In 2019, the country's press freedom was recorded 140 rank in Press Freedom Index, making it a slight decline than in previous annual report.[9] The India's global index rank was declined for several issues such as killings of journalists, restrictions imposed on news media, censorship in Kashmir, and Jammu and Kashmir which has been a subject of dispute between India and Pakistan.[10]

Targeting victims such as physical abuse against journalists and prejudice is one of the other reasons for the decline in the world ranking index.[11] In 2017, the country was ranked 136 out of 180 nations, and later it declined to 138 in 2018 in the world index report.[12]

The 2022 edition of the World Press Freedom Index, which assesses the state of journalism in 180 countries and territories, reveals that India's ranking fell from 133 in 2016 to 150 in 2021. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) released the Index on 3 May 2022.[13]

Reactions[edit]

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting criticised the report published by the Reporters Without Borders in 2020 citing "the surveys portray a bad picture about freedom of press in India".[14]

Censorship on press[edit]

In 1956, a private bill introduced by Feroz Gandhi called Parliamentary Proceedings became a crucial law in the history of Indian press freedom.[15] But this law was repealed by the then Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi during Emergency in 1975.[15] As part of the Emergency, Indira Gandhi made complete restriction over the press, banning all domestic and international news, expelling many foreign journalists and correspondents and revoking the accreditation of over 40 Indian reporters.[16] Many historians believe that she was intimidated by the growing criticism of her government and feared that the press was supporting the movement started by Jayaprakash Narayan.[16]

In 2020, the Press Council of India, a state-owned body argued that government authorities, including state police's censorship on mass media is unfavorable citing "intimidation" of journalists and the "curtailment" of press freedom. The country's news outlets and their associated journalists were allegedly charged with sedition and criminal prosecution charges by the authorities. The Press Club of India (PCI) described charges against journalists as a "string of seemingly malafide actions". The organization claims that the federal government of India was responsible for unfavorable censorship of press and journalists.[17][18][19] The International Press Institute (IPI), an international organizations dedicated to the improvement of journalistic practices, claims that the government of India is responsible for restricting journalists covering COVID-19 pandemic-related reports in the country.[20]

In 2020, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting blocked the MediaOne TV temporarily for covering a news about the "mob attacks on Muslims" in the country's capital New Delhi. The channel was later resumed after a period of 48 hours.[21] The Jammu and Kashmir Police, a law enforcement and counterinsurgency agency, often interrogate journalists while some are charged and arrested over national security reportage and nominally defamatory news stories involving government.[22] The state administration of Jammu and Kashmir also indefinitely stopped giving government ads to newspapers, including Greater Kashmir and Kashmir Reader running in the Jammu Jammu and Kashmir union territory,[23] while the federal government banned Times of India, The Hindu and Telegraph India temporarily from running government ads on their platforms.[24]

Sometimes, only news that favours the government is published by the local media, whilst news that covers the economic and political problems in the country, or criticisms of the government faces government-issued warnings. It is claimed that the print and broadcasting media carry stories on the bases of emotions or under the political pressure of the party in power,[25][26] while the domestic media outlets are claimed to support leaders' arguments.[27] Indian media is often criticized for carrying media war during military conflicts, and expressing one-sided identification with vigorous support for their interests.[28][29] Several media outlets act as cheerleaders by publishing the political agenda of the ruling party's leaders. The constitution of India protects freedom of speech and freedom of the press. However, critics state that press freedom is restrained, and the government only encourages speech that supports it and the prevailing ruling party.[30] The government is accused by critics of falsely labelling independent press with "fake news" to try to evade critical observation of the media.[31]

In 2020 or earlier, the government of India issued warnings against the foreign news outlets, including The New York Times, The Guardian, Al Jazeera, The Washington Post, Time, The Economist, BBC, and Huffington Post for portraying India's image negatively.[32]

Reporters Without Borders stated that followers of Hindutva are attempting to censor claimed "anti-national" thoughts. Coordinated hate campaigns by Hindutva followers against journalists critical of Hindutva sometimes call for those journalists to be murdered. Journalists critical of the government often suffer from criminal prosecutions, with Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code often being cited by prosecutors.[33]

In February 2023, the government raided the offices of the BBC, accusing it of corruption and tax evasion, shortly after it aired a documentary (which the government banned) critical of Modi for his involvement with anti-Muslim violence.[34]

Attacks on journalists[edit]

Several journalists such as Sagarika Ghose, Ravish Kumar have said that they were subjected to harassment, intimidation including death and rape threats when they were skeptical of the Bharatiya Janata Party government. Bobby Ghosh, the editor of the Hindustan Times resigned in September 2018 shortly after the Prime Minister Narendra Modi reportedly met Shobhana Bhartia, the owner of the newspaper.[35] The incident occurred after Ghosh opened a portal called the Hate Tracker on the newspaper, a database for tracking violent crimes motivated by race, religion and sexual orientation. The database was later taken down.[36][37]

At least three journalists were killed in 2017 in connection with their jobs. Reporters Without Borders stated Gauri Lankesh a proponent of secularism and a critic of right-wing forces was shot dead outside her house. A member of a Hindu nationalist group was arrested for killing Lankesh.[37][38] A report stated that between 2014 and 2019, 40 journalists were killed and at least 198 severe attacks on journalists were reported, of which, 36 occurred in 2019 alone.[39]

Reports Without Borders stated that journalists suffer from violence from the police, political activists, criminal groups, and corrupt local officials.[33]

Cult of personality[edit]

The media have consistently upheld the personality cult of the leaders since the country's formation. It reported on the activities of the leader, regularly reporting on their political campaigns, frequently including "advertisements" to ruling parties through radio, television and Newspaper display ads. Previously, media would refer to 2014 Indian general election campaign of the Bharatiya Janata Party, a major political party as the "Abki Baar, Modi Sarkar" (this time Modi government). The political slogan was heavily covered by news media in the country.[40][41][42] Media reports in India that support the ruling party are criticized as being often one-sided and exaggerated, playing little or no role in gathering true information and providing propaganda on their platforms. The independent newspapers running in the country covered 2019 general election with a focus on Narendra Modi, inadvertently giving him more coverage.[43]

The CMS Media Lab, a nonpartisanism subsidiary of the research organisation CMS stated in its report that Modi, the current prime minister,[lower-alpha 1] received 33.21% of the primetime news coverage during his last election campaign while the competitors' political parties such as Aam Aadmi Party led by Arvind Kejriwal received 10.31% media coverage and the Indian National Congress candidate Rahul Gandhi received 4.33% prime-time news telecast coverage.[44]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. "In Modi's India, journalists face bullying, criminal cases and worse". Washington Post.
  2. "Article 19(1) in The Constitution Of India 1949".
  3. "What is Article 19 in the Constitution of India: Explained". The Times of India. 10 January 2020.
  4. "Explained: Section 499 — the defamation law in India". The Statesman. 15 October 2018.
  5. "Back to Law Commission Home Page". www.lawcommissionofindia.nic.in.
  6. "Freedom of the Press in India" (PDF).
  7. "New media policy for UT: J&K officials to rule on 'fake news', take legal action". 10 June 2020.
  8. Dore, Bhavya (17 April 2020). "Fake News, Real Arrests". Foreign Policy.
  9. Jha, Fiza (21 April 2020). "'Pressure to toe Hindutva line' sees India drop to 142 on World Press Freedom Index". ThePrint.
  10. "On all fours: The press freedom". The Telegraph.
  11. "India's ranking in press freedom falls to 138". The Hindu. 26 April 2018.
  12. "PCI rejects World Press Freedom Index citing 'lack of clarity'". The Hindu. 6 May 2018.
  13. "India Slips 8 Notches to 150 out of 180 Countries in World Press Freedom Index". NewsClick. 3 May 2022. Retrieved 14 August 2022.
  14. "India slips in press freedom rankings; Javadekar slams report". The Hindu. 3 May 2020.
  15. 15.0 15.1 "അന്നാദ്യമായി ഇന്ദിര ഫാസിസ്റ്റ് എന്ന വിളി കേട്ടു, പിന്നെ വീട്ടിൽ നിന്ന് ഇറങ്ങിപ്പോയി". Mathrubhumi (in മലയാളം). 15 June 2022.
  16. 16.0 16.1 "World Press Freedom Day: When press in India faced its darkest hour during emergency | Jagran Trending". English Jagran. 6 May 2022.
  17. Service, Tribune News. "Media bodies slam authorities for 'curtailing' press freedom". Tribuneindia News Service.
  18. "Press Club of India Slams Police Action Against Gujarati Editor, FIRs Against Himachal Scribes". The Wire.
  19. "The Fate of Press Freedom in India Over the Years". The Wire.
  20. Kamdar, Bansari. "COVID-19 and Shrinking Press Freedom in India". thediplomat.com.
  21. Goel, Vindu; Gettleman, Jeffrey; Khandelwal, Saumya (2 April 2020). "Under Modi, India's Press Is Not So Free Anymore". The New York Times.
  22. "Journalism in Kashmir in 'state of repression': Media watchdog". www.aljazeera.com.
  23. "J&K govt has stopped advertisements in two newspapers, alleges Kashmir Editors Guild". 23 February 2019.
  24. "How Modi government uses ad spending to 'reward or punish' Indian media". The Independent. 7 July 2019.
  25. Kumar, Raksha (2 August 2019). "India's Media Can't Speak Truth to Power". Foreign Policy.
  26. Filkins, Dexter (2 December 2019). "Blood and Soil in Narendra Modi's India". The New Yorker.
  27. Daniyal, Shoaib (29 September 2019). "The Indian media saw Modi's US visit as a great success. But Americans themselves barely noticed it". Scroll.in.
  28. "India and Pakistan: How the war was fought in TV studios". BBC News. 10 March 2019.
  29. "Could better accountability put a stop to India and Pakistan's war-mongering?". www.ids.ac.uk. 6 March 2019.
  30. Bhurtel, Bhim (29 April 2020). "Corporate media a serious threat to Indian democracy". Asia Times.
  31. Daniyal, Shoaib (12 May 2020). "Modi government is misusing the 'fake news' tag to try to evade media scrutiny". Scroll.in.
  32. "India As Seen From Abroad: Why Government Is Angry With Foreign Media". Outlook.
  33. 33.0 33.1 "India: Modi tightens his grip on the media". Reporters Without Borders. 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  34. With raids, arrests and hostile takeovers, India press freedom continues to decline
  35. Srivas, Anuj (6 March 2018). "Hindustan Times Editor's Exit Preceded by Meeting Between Modi, Newspaper Owner". The Wire. Retrieved 20 December 2020.
  36. "Hindustan Times pulls down its Hate Tracker". Newslaundry. 25 October 2017. Retrieved 20 December 2020.
  37. 37.0 37.1 Gopalakrishnan, Raju (27 April 2018). "Indian journalists say they are intimidated, ostracised if they criticise Modi and the BJP". Reuters.
  38. "Fresh arrest in Gauri Lankesh murder case, accused held in Jharkhand". India Today. Press Trust of India. 10 January 2020.
  39. Mantri, Geetika (23 December 2019). "40 journalists killed in India, 198 serious attacks in last five years, finds study". The News Minute. Retrieved 23 December 2020.
  40. Kazmin, Amy (8 April 2014). "Modi personality cult dominates India election". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 19 April 2014.
  41. NP, Ullekh (19 April 2015). "Abki baar Modi sarkar: whose line was it anyway?". Scroll.in.
  42. Mody, Anjali (13 August 2018). "Media freedom in the Modi age: The cat-and-mouse game is set to get more fierce as 2019 nears". Scroll.in.
  43. Arora, Vishal. "How India's Liberal Media Facilitated Narendra Modi's Reelection Sweep". thediplomat.com.
  44. S, Rukmini (8 May 2014). "Modi got most prime-time coverage: study". The Hindu.

Notes[edit]

  1. Year 2020