Bharatpedia:Requests for adminship/rdxmen000
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/0/0); ended 18:44, 18 November 2021 (IST) - This was unsuccessful becasue the candidate was asked to complete the nomination on their talk page, but they failed to take any action. WikiDwarf (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2021 (IST)
rdxmen000Edit
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page)
(0/0/0); Scheduled to end You're almost there. All you need to do now is substitute the time parser function (it isn't as scary as it sounds, edit the page and inline comments will guide you). This will fix the end time and prevent it from constantly changing. Remove the <!-- and --> around subst: in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.
NominationEdit
rdxmen000 (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Rdxmen000 (talk) 11:15, 11 November 2021 (IST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidateEdit
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Bharatpedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Bharatpedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
DiscussionEdit
- Links for rdxmen000: Rdxmen000 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · spi)
- Edit summary usage for rdxmen000 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
SupportEdit
OpposeEdit
NeutralEdit
General commentsEdit
We check your submissions carefully
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.