Bharatpedia:Administrators' noticeboard

Good morning

Good morning @Ajay Kumar, GoneForTea, and WikiDwarf:! The administrators' noticeboard is created today. I just want to remind you! Thanks! :) --SonOfZeus (talk) 08:29, 28 June 2022 (IST)

@SonOfZeus: Thank you for creating this page. Since you already have the adminship on en and mni wikis, I have added you to the global sysop group so you can manage the newly created omp-bharatpedia as well. Please let me know if everything is working fine. Thanks. WikiDwarf (talk) 16:39, 28 June 2022 (IST)

WikiDwarf Thank you and please enable mobile edit version for both Modern Meitei as well as Ancient Meitei Bharatpedias. In Modern Meitei Bharatpedia, there was the mobile version enabled before but it's not present now. Please enable them. Regards! :) --SonOfZeus (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2022 (IST)

@SonOfZeus: I have forwarded your request and the mobile version will be installed soon. There is some issue with the email server so for better communication, updates and reports you may use the Bharatpedia's Telagram channel. WikiDwarf (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2022 (IST)

WikiDwarf Thank you for the information! :-) --SonOfZeus (talk) 19:03, 28 June 2022 (IST)

Report: User Ganeshay17 – disruptive/unconstructive editing

USER WARNED

Ganeshay17 warned by WikiDwarf for unconstructive editing. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 16:55, 7 October 2026 (IST)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I would like to report Ganeshay17 for repeated edits that appear to be disruptive and unnecessarily alter article content.

In particular, on K. Jamuna Rani and M. S. Rajeswari, and many more the user has been adding or changing language-related information without clear supporting sources, as well as making unnecessary changes to existing sections and formatting. I have asked the user to stop making unrelated changes and to follow the existing article structure, but the editing has continued. I request that an administrator review the user's recent contributions and determine whether administrative action is necessary. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 03:32, 21 September 2026 (IST)

Somebody is trying to kill me Ganeshay17 (talk) 04:18, 21 September 2026 (IST)

Nobody is trying to kill you?. Stop making baseless accusations and keep the discussion focused on your edits and the relevant history. An administrator can review the matter. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 04:56, 21 September 2026 (IST)

@Editorial Oversight: Thank you for the report. The user has been warned and requested to ensure that future edits are relevant, properly sourced, and constructive, and not to remove properly sourced information without good reason. In future cases, please first use the relevant warning templates listed at category:User warning templates for any further unconstructive edits. If the user continues after the third warning, please feel free to report the matter again for further review. WikiDwarf (talk) 10:33, 21 September 2026 (IST)

Noted ✅️ Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 12:56, 21 September 2026 (IST)

I would like to report Muruganindia80 for vandalism , sexual abuse, harassment, and many other charges. Watch out for him. He is a poser. If you see him, please call 911 102 or 112 His name is Donald Jones. Thank you, from U. ணைடு (U. Naidu) Ganeshay17 (talk) 03:58, 22 September 2026 (IST)

@Ganeshay17, User account "Muruganindia80" is not registered on Bharatpedia yet. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 16:45, 7 October 2026 (IST)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suspected connection between GBPrakashani and BBEntertainment

NO ACTION

No administrative action required at this time. The filing editor has acknowledged the AN notification requirement. Both suspected accounts have been notified of BP:ALT and asked to disclose any alternative accounts. If further evidence of coordinated editing or undisclosed accounts emerges, please file a new AN report or SPI. Closing as resolved. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 13:54, 5 October 2026 (IST)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GBPrakashani created Abhijit Ashok Paul and is associated with Draft:Pranab Kr Nath.

A new account, BBEntertainment, which is five years old, created Draft:Sesh Belay Tumi, directed by Pranab Kr Nath, and also edited the Abhijit Ashok Paul article.

The overlapping editing activity raises suspicion of a possible connection between these two accounts. I request an administrator to review their contributions and investigate whether there is any evidence of coordinated editing or an account connection.Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 04:55, 2 October 2026 (IST)

References

@Editorial Oversight, have you asked the user to disclose their alternate account in case they are unaware of the guidelines? 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 12:19, 4 October 2026 (IST)

See BP:ALT. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 13:33, 4 October 2026 (IST)

I am already aware of BP:ALT and the disclosure requirements. I had not seems him to disclosed any alternate account, and I also had not been asked to so. I thought it would be better to ping an administrator first so the matter could be reviewed appropriately. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 14:18, 4 October 2026 (IST)

@Editorial Oversight, I have informed both accounts [1] [2] regarding the guidelines and have also asked for disclosure. Also, next time, if you want to file a case against any other editor, you must inform that editor that there is a case going on at BP:AN which includes their account. If you file an SPI, there is no requirement to inform the editor against whom you are filing the SPI, but for filing a case on AN, you must inform the editor. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 12:59, 5 October 2026 (IST)

Thanks for clarifying. I understand the procedure and will make sure to notify the editor first in future BP:AN cases. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 13:06, 5 October 2026 (IST)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Report User:Dr. Editor

This user, Dr. Editor is creating pages with infoboxes only with no content and no citations like Rao Bal Kishan and has been damaging well-sourced articles like Ahir. This leads us to the belief that he's pursuing a castist agenda. Clean-up and restoration is required and user should be banned if he can't change his ways. Dokania (talk) 14:31, 7 October 2026 (IST)

Before filing a report, please notify the editor first and point out the mistakes or problematic edits that have been identified. Give them an opportunity to understand the concerns and correct their edits. If they do not respond or continue making the same issues, then a formal report can be considered. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 14:48, 7 October 2026 (IST)

There should be a template to notify him. Wouldn't it need a script to correct his edits? Dokania (talk) 17:22, 7 October 2026 (IST)

I found out that there is Bharatpedia:AntiVandal, I think @WikiDwarf can use it. I have no clue on how to use it and which edits should be reverted while protecting good faith edits (if there are any) Dokania (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2026 (IST)

@Dokania Nope, you just need to remind them on their talk page that there is a case on BP:AN that may involve them. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 17:39, 7 October 2026 (IST)

A template will look professional and confer all important information as there should be in the notice which can be added easily to their talk page, obviously after filling the required fields as in infobox. Dokania (talk) 17:42, 7 October 2026 (IST)

We have Template:AN-notice, use it by {{subst:AN-notice}} or {{subst:AN-notice|topic|noticeboard=Bharatpedia:Administrators' noticeboard|reason=reason for discussion|thread=thread name of the discussion|sign=yes|heading=yes}} — ~~~~. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 17:49, 7 October 2026 (IST)

@Dokania, as Editorial Oversight has already explained, I will not repeat it. I checked the @Dr. Editor contributions. Since they had not received any warnings yet, I warned them for creating a completely unsourced article[3] and also warned them for mass content modification and removal without providing valid edit summaries[4].

As for the alleged caste-biased editing, I cannot take administrative action based solely on an allegation. Please provide specific edit diffs demonstrating the discrepancy between what the cited source actually states and what the editor added to the article. This will allow the matter to be assessed on the basis of evidence.

If the edits are demonstrated to contain deliberately fabricated or hoax content, the matter can be addressed more seriously, including administrative action where appropriate, without necessarily issuing further warnings. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 15:59, 7 October 2026 (IST)

It's quite obvious from his contributions page. Almost all the edits are made with a casteist agenda favoruring Ahirs which group is identical to Yadav caste. Dokania (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2026 (IST)