.svg)
B. Vinod Kumar: Difference between revisions
m
Fixing archives for YouTube videos (WP:Link_Rot, WP:CEFC#Pre-emptive_archiving, phab:T294880)
>ElliAWB m (Reverted edits by Ebbedlila (talk) to last version by Colonies Chris. requested at ANI) |
>Rlink2 m (Fixing archives for YouTube videos (WP:Link_Rot, WP:CEFC#Pre-emptive_archiving, phab:T294880)) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|caption = | |caption = | ||
|constituency = [[Karimnagar (Lok Sabha Constituency)|Karimnagar]] | |constituency = [[Karimnagar (Lok Sabha Constituency)|Karimnagar]] | ||
|office = | |office = [[Member of parliament, Lok Sabha|Member of Parliament]] <br /> for [[Karimnagar (Lok Sabha Constituency)|Karimnagar]] | ||
| term_start = 16 May 2014 | | term_start = 16 May 2014 | ||
| term_end = 23 May 2019 | | term_end = 23 May 2019 | ||
| Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
====Bifurcation of AP High Court==== | ====Bifurcation of AP High Court==== | ||
Section 31 and 32 of the [[Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act]] provide for the bifurcation of the [[Andhra Pradesh High Court]].<ref name="indiacode.nic.in">{{Cite web |url=http://www.indiacode.nic.in/acts2014/6%20of%202014.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=6 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924034307/http://www.indiacode.nic.in/acts2014/6%20of%202014.pdf |archive-date=24 September 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> However delay in the process of bifurcation led TRS leaders to protest against the Government stating that no action was taken even after nine months.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150304/nation-current-affairs/article/trs-wants-high-court-be-bifurcated|title=TRS wants High Court to be bifurcated|date=2015-03-04|work=Deccan Chronicle|access-date=2017-05-02|language=en}}</ref> Vinod frequently brought up the issue in Parliament and alleged that the issue was being stalled on some pretext or the other. He argued that only six out of the total 29 judges were from Telangana and this led to discrimination in the handling of cases.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-telangana/appeal-to-transfer-telangana-cases-to-other-high-courts/article7186631.ece|title=Appeal to transfer Telangana cases to other High Courts|work=The Hindu|access-date=2017-05-02|language=en}}</ref> He even demanded the [[Prime Minister]]’s intervention after discussions with the Law Minister did not yield results.<ref>{{Citation|last=B Vinod Kumar|title=MP B Vinod Kumar asks PM asked to create separate High Court for Telangana|date=2015-06-09|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1K2BqqHWg|access-date=2017-05-02}}</ref> | Section 31 and 32 of the [[Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act]] provide for the bifurcation of the [[Andhra Pradesh High Court]].<ref name="indiacode.nic.in">{{Cite web |url=http://www.indiacode.nic.in/acts2014/6%20of%202014.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=6 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924034307/http://www.indiacode.nic.in/acts2014/6%20of%202014.pdf |archive-date=24 September 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> However delay in the process of bifurcation led TRS leaders to protest against the Government stating that no action was taken even after nine months.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150304/nation-current-affairs/article/trs-wants-high-court-be-bifurcated|title=TRS wants High Court to be bifurcated|date=2015-03-04|work=Deccan Chronicle|access-date=2017-05-02|language=en}}</ref> Vinod frequently brought up the issue in Parliament and alleged that the issue was being stalled on some pretext or the other. He argued that only six out of the total 29 judges were from Telangana and this led to discrimination in the handling of cases.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-telangana/appeal-to-transfer-telangana-cases-to-other-high-courts/article7186631.ece|title=Appeal to transfer Telangana cases to other High Courts|work=The Hindu|access-date=2017-05-02|language=en}}</ref> He even demanded the [[Prime Minister]]’s intervention after discussions with the Law Minister did not yield results.<ref>{{Citation|last=B Vinod Kumar|title=MP B Vinod Kumar asks PM asked to create separate High Court for Telangana|date=2015-06-09|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1K2BqqHWg |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211218/Ha1K2BqqHWg |archive-date=2021-12-18 |url-status=live|access-date=2017-05-02}}{{cbignore}}</ref> | ||
====Increase in seats in Legislative Assemblies==== | ====Increase in seats in Legislative Assemblies==== | ||
| Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
====Railway Budget 2015–16==== | ====Railway Budget 2015–16==== | ||
The demands made on the rail budget<ref>{{Citation|last=B Vinod Kumar|title=MP B Vinod Kumar raises the requirements of Telangana State from Rail Budget 2015|date=2015-06-10|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UREWzjabbho|access-date=2017-05-02}}</ref> were as follows: | The demands made on the rail budget<ref>{{Citation|last=B Vinod Kumar|title=MP B Vinod Kumar raises the requirements of Telangana State from Rail Budget 2015|date=2015-06-10|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UREWzjabbho |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211218/UREWzjabbho |archive-date=2021-12-18 |url-status=live|access-date=2017-05-02}}{{cbignore}}</ref> were as follows: | ||
* Completion of Peddapalle-Nizamabad project. | * Completion of Peddapalle-Nizamabad project. | ||
* Declaration of railway division in Kazipet. | * Declaration of railway division in Kazipet. | ||