Draft:Kalki Avatar and Muhammad: Difference between revisions

Line 67: Line 67:


Bangladeshi Islamic scholar [[Abubakar Muhammad Zakaria]], who has conducted advanced research and studies on [[Hinduism]] at the [[Islamic University of Madinah]] in Saudi Arabia, said about the book in his book ''Hinduism wa tasur bad al firaq al islamiat biha'' (Hinduism and some Islamic groups influenced by it) that,  
Bangladeshi Islamic scholar [[Abubakar Muhammad Zakaria]], who has conducted advanced research and studies on [[Hinduism]] at the [[Islamic University of Madinah]] in Saudi Arabia, said about the book in his book ''Hinduism wa tasur bad al firaq al islamiat biha'' (Hinduism and some Islamic groups influenced by it) that,  
"There is a section for this Purana ([[Bhavishya Purana]]) called [[Kalki Purana]], which touched upon [[Kalki]] Avatar, (Avatar that comes in the Kali time, or the last time) and what came in this Purana was the reality of Muhammad only, when one of their scholars [[(Ved Prakash Upaddhay]]) admitted that there is no Kalki Avatar except Muhammad and he mentioned evidence for that from this book, and claimed that it only applies to it, except that the Hindus differed in accepting this part of the book, and they said that it was plagiarized and it was developed by the later and it was included in the book at a very late time."<ref name="AHWT"/> Zakaria also criticized the book, saying that Narasangsha is described in verse 127 of the 20th volume of the Atharveda as Kalki which is not the main body of the Atharvaveda, he said that it is an anticipatory portion and subsequent connections, and claimed that prophecies of the Prophet [[Muhammad]] in Hindu scriptures were used by Hindus to make their scriptures acceptable to Muslims, which is a clever attempt, beginning with Akbar's reign to flatter Emperor Akbar by writing the [[Allopanishad]], he claims that the Bhavishya Purana is completely fabricated and man-made with Hindu references. He says that Hinduism has a habit of adding everything in it's religion they got outside in the name of their own religion fabricatedly to attract people to come into their religion, this is also a result of that. In addition, all Hindu scriptures, including the Vedas, are claimed to be adaptations of the beliefs of the [[Aryan]]s, [[Dravid]]ians, and Indian regional indigenous religions, and says that since the Hindu texts do not contain the monotheism of God or [[Allah]], it is in neither consistent with the original tenets of Islam, nor these are original devine books, rather the pagan [[Advaita Vedanta]] philosophy influenced the concept of [[Wahdat al-Wujud]] or [[Sufism]] in the name of Islam, arose and as Hinduism established itself as a conformist and syncretistic doctrine from the Islamic point of view. He claimed that, all Hindu scriptures are not inspired and man-made Aryan literature and the theory that this book attributed Kalki to Muhammad, he claimed, was a false and deceitful attempt.<ref name="AHWT">{{cite book |title=الهندوسية وتأثر بعض الفرق الاسلامية بها |date=2016 |publisher=Dār al-Awrāq al-Thaqāfīyah |isbn=978-603-90755-6-1 |pages=870-890 |url=https://books.google.com.bd/books?id=zLGztAEACAAJ&dq=%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9+%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%A3%D8%AB%D8%B1+%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%B6+%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%82+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9+%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%A7&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y |access-date=28 July 2023  |lang=ar}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=প্রশ্ন : হিন্দু ধর্মে ভবিষ্যৎবাণী কোথায় থেকে আসলো? শাইখ প্রফেসর ড. আবু বকর মুহাম্মাদ যাকারিয়া (Question: Where did prophecy come from in Hinduism?  Sheikh Professor Dr.  Abu Bakar Muhammad Zakaria) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KteGroIh940|publisher=[[Abubakar Muhammad Zakaria]]'s YouTube page|access-date=15 January 2021}}</ref>
"There is a section for this Purana ([[Bhavishya Purana]]) called [[Kalki Purana]], which touched upon [[Kalki]] Avatar, (Avatar that comes in the Kali time, or the last time) and what came in this Purana was the reality of Muhammad only, when one of their scholars [[(Ved Prakash Upaddhay]]) admitted that there is no Kalki Avatar except Muhammad and he mentioned evidence for that from this book, and claimed that it only applies to it, except that the Hindus differed in accepting this part of the book, and they said that it was plagiarized and it was developed by the later and it was included in the book at a very late time."<ref name="AHWT"/> Zakaria also criticized the book, saying that Narasangsha is described in verse 127 of the 20th volume of the Atharveda as Kalki which is not the main body of the Atharvaveda, he said that it is an anticipatory portion and subsequent connections, and claimed that prophecies of the Prophet [[Muhammad]] in Hindu scriptures were used by Hindus to make their scriptures acceptable to Muslims, which is a clever attempt, beginning with Akbar's reign to flatter Emperor Akbar by writing the [[Allopanishad]], he claims that the Bhavishya Purana is completely fabricated and man-made with Hindu references. He says that Hinduism has a habit of adding everything in it's religion they got outside in the name of their own religion fabricatedly to attract people to come into their religion, this is also a result of that. In addition, all Hindu scriptures, including the Vedas, are claimed to be adaptations of the beliefs of the [[Aryan]]s, [[Dravid]]ians, and Indian regional indigenous religions, and says that since the Hindu texts do not contain the monotheism of God or [[Allah]], it is in neither consistent with the original tenets of Islam, nor these are original devine books, rather the pagan [[Advaita Vedanta]] philosophy influenced the concept of [[Wahdat al-Wujud]] or [[Sufism]] in the name of Islam, arose and as Hinduism established itself as a conformist and syncretistic doctrine from the Islamic point of view. He claimed that, all Hindu scriptures are not inspired and man-made Aryan literature and the theory that this book attributed Kalki to Muhammad, he claimed, was a false and deceitful attempt.<ref name="AHWT">{{cite book |title=الهندوسية وتأثر بعض الفرق الاسلامية بها |date=2016 |publisher=Dār al-Awrāq al-Thaqāfīyah |isbn=978-603-90755-6-1 |pages=870-890 |url=https://books.google.com.bd/books?id=zLGztAEACAAJ&dq=%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9+%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%A3%D8%AB%D8%B1+%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%B6+%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%82+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9+%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%A7&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y |access-date=28 July 2023  |lang=ar}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=প্রশ্ন : হিন্দু ধর্মে ভবিষ্যৎবাণী কোথায় থেকে আসলো? শাইখ প্রফেসর ড. আবু বকর মুহাম্মাদ যাকারিয়া (Question: Where did prophecy come from in Hinduism?  Sheikh Professor Dr.  Abu Bakar Muhammad Zakaria) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KteGroIh940|publisher=[[Abubakar Muhammad Zakaria]]'s YouTube page|access-date=15 January 2021|quote=1
00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:24,840
The question is, there has been prophesized about Muhammad s.a.w. in the Hindu scriptures  and it is not possible to give prophecy except Allah.  Are they really prophecies? Give me a clear concept. Well, let's see. Firstly, a believer always has to believe it.
 
2
00:00:25,380 --> 00:00:50,340
That a believer has to believe that Allah has taken promises about Muhammad s.a.w. from every prophet.  Because Allah has said in Quran, Remember when I have taken promises from prophets, I have given you book and knowledge everything.
 
3
00:00:50,540 --> 00:01:06,500
But when my messenger will come you have to follow them.  He is Muhammad s.a.w. For that every prophet knew about him and that promise has been taken from them. So they knew about Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. Although not in detail but they knew about him.
 
4
00:01:07,100 --> 00:01:25,140
Many of them told about him in their books.  That's why it is directly mentioned in Torah and Bible and Allah himself has also declared that.  In Torah and Injil they clearly get the mention about him. It is true and many of them had written book about him.
 
5
00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:40,380
Torah and Injil are proven as Allah's books.  So it is common to have this mention in them.  These are not any prophecy.  The things mentioned in book are given by Allah.  Giving prophecy is a shame. Giving prophecy like this is not permissible. What is said by Allah is not any prophecy.
 
6
00:01:40,580 --> 00:01:57,640
For example, the punishment in grave is mentioned in Quran and Hadith.  They are not prophecy. Allah has delivered them to us.  And we have to keep faith on them.  So people of these prophets kept faith on them. Now the question is from where did it come to Hindu scriptures?
 
7
00:01:58,240 --> 00:02:15,580
There is no chance to come it in Hindu scriptures.  Because we don't believe Hindu scriptures as revealed book of Allah.  Why don't we believe? Because we have read them and have seen.  By not reading anything can be said.  There is no existence of monotheism in them. Not about afterlife, not about messengers.
 
8
00:02:16,460 --> 00:02:31,660
Without three things no book can be Allah's book.  No one of them is Allah's book.  Then from where did these prophecies come?  This which is my opinion as I have done PhD in Hindu religion.  It seems to me that. There was a great wondrous man in India.
 
9
00:02:32,640 --> 00:02:49,380
His name was Krishna Dweepayon.  Krishna Dweepayon himself has written all these books.  Krishna Dweepayon used to do that.  There was two sections of Aryans. One is Indian section and another is Iranian section.
 
10
00:02:49,560 --> 00:03:04,760
Iranian section used to worship Asuras.  And Indian section used to worship Devas.  That's why there is a big epic of Devasura wars in their books.  Devasur means war between Dev and Asura.  This war was not a war of weapons. It was war of speech.
 
11
00:03:04,840 --> 00:03:20,720
Krishna Dweepayon used to go to Iran from India.  At there he used to discuss with them.  Then they worshipped Ahura Mazda.  The concept of Ahura Mazda was nearer to Islam. Means nearer to the rules of Allah.
 
12
00:03:20,840 --> 00:03:35,920
As they lived nearer to Arab peninsula.  Most of them knew about Abrahamic religion and have written in their books.  Some parts from them has been added in Hindu scripture.  Outside that they are not. They are not prapt or gotten sentences.
 
13
00:03:36,240 --> 00:03:52,900
They are sage or rishi sentences as Hindus say.  That's why you will see in first three Vedas.  Rigveda, Yajurveda, Rigveda, Samveda and Yajurveda. In these three Vedas you will get nothing of them about Rasulullah.
 
14
00:03:53,440 --> 00:04:08,940
Lastly in Atharva Veda.  Atharva Veda is said as the last Veda.  It has been written later.  Its culture is also different from the others.  Its culture doesn't match with other Vedas.  Its difference is easily understood. Some have said it as Prakrita or interpolation.
 
15
00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:24,260
Specially the discussion of Narasamsa.  They have said this part as interpolation.  And they said that it has been added later.  That's why in Atharva Veda which is called Kuntap Sukta. That by reciting these Suktas.
 
16
00:04:24,820 --> 00:04:41,940
Heat and pressure are relieved.  Hindus says that they are later added part.  There is not any single sign of Quran and Sunnah in their books.  As we don't get any verse of Allah in their books. So there is no chance to call them as Allah's words.
 
17
00:04:42,080 --> 00:05:00,260
They have entered this word as interpolations.  Their nature is if they find anything anywhere they absorb it.  Entering into their religion anything found new.  This is a bad habit of them.  And you will wonder that in continuance of this habit. They have later written a book named Allah Upanishad.
 
18
00:05:00,400 --> 00:05:16,180
When that was the time of the reign of Akbar.  They made it as an Upanishad.  Not too far from now.  In the time of Akbar they wrote Allah Upanishad.  Before that they never mentioned the word Allah.  So it means that the word Allah was never in their books. Those who never knew the name of Allah.
 
19
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:32,640
In reality how much of their book is the word of Allah.  Can never be assured.  And it is proved that they are not the words of Allah.  Again you can see that not only Upanishad.  The book Bhavishya Puran which they have written. Is completely written later by their own hand.
 
20
00:05:32,780 --> 00:05:49,380
They are not part of their basic Puranas.  Not part of 18 Puranas.  And you all know that they have 14 Upanishads.  And 18 Puranas.  And 4 Vedas. And 2 are their history called Ramayana and Mahabharata.
 
21
00:05:49,860 --> 00:06:05,480
And they have 14th Smriti.  Which is called Smriti.  Manu Samhita or Manu Parashara or Samhita which are 14.  In any of them we cannot find Quran or Sunnah. Or anything mentioned in our Quran and Sunnah.
 
22
00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:22,760
Nothing mentioned about Allah.  Nothing mentioned about Messenger.  About any Messenger.  And no word has been mentioned about afterlife.  They are only in all these books.  Specially when they came to the Puranas. Although in Vedas and Upanishads there is no mention about rebirth.
 
23
00:06:23,060 --> 00:06:39,520
When they started writing Puranas.  They all created the theory of reincarnation.  It means that a completely new thought was developed in them then.  Others saying that final judgment will be held only one time. They say judgment will be held many times.
 
24
00:06:39,580 --> 00:06:58,280
They have changed the concept by themselves.  Which means it is understood that.  If you agree that the things are really mentioned in their books.  They are told on behalf of Allah.  Then you have given a recognition of their books as authentic. That's why some of them have written books named Kolki Avatar and Muhammad Sahib.
 
25
00:06:58,580 --> 00:07:14,700
But never accepted Islam.  For their absorbing tendency.  They thought if we take it.  Then they will remain with us.  A basic thing among them is that.  You know that Hindu religion has no relation with any basic belief.  How many belief anyone take. As long as he doesn't declare his apostasy.
 
26
00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:31,980
He will remain a Hindu.  He will be burned accordingly.  He will be burned according to Hindu tradition.  There will be no problem to call him a Hindu.  Because Mahatma Gandhi has been said.  About traits of Hinduism.  He said as characteristics. That in there, there is no obligation of any Akheda belief.
 
27
00:07:32,740 --> 00:07:49,280
Which means you can believe anything you want.  If it is that Hinduism.  Then you can understand.  There is absorbeness.  They include anything they get from anywhere.  That's why these are found in their books.  They have placed them in their books as poems. Later those of us who do not understand.
 
28
00:07:49,400 --> 00:08:05,460
We are taking a chance to think their book as acceptable.  By these things.  Now Zubillah.  We will be sinner.  These are not Allah's books.  And we don't have to say it.  It is clearly understood that these are not Allah's books.  Why you will say it. That it is revealed on any prophet or messenger.
 
29
00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:21,100
We cannot say them as Allah's books.  It contains only they stolen from other books.  Included from other place.  It is taken from different places.  They are not part of their book.  If you read their books. You will find in Vedas from starting.
 
30
00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:37,760
Fire meets priest.  They are reading Agni, Agni, Agni.  They are saying.  What will happen by this?  Fire works as priest.  If you feed fire.  That will go to Gods.  Devtas.  Who have said it.  We can understand that.  They remained in such a time. When Qurban used to be happened.
 
31
00:08:38,740 --> 00:08:54,140
Means there was a time of Yajna.  For example.  Ibn Adam.  Two sons of Adam.  Performed Yajna.  Allah accepted one and rejected other.  From that time.  They didn't take any tradition of any prophet or messenger.  We don't say. Not any has been sent to them.
 
32
00:08:54,520 --> 00:09:11,000
They had got prophets.  But reality is the people of Indian subcontinent.  Used to think someone as sheep.  And someone as Allah.  They made someone God.  And killed some other one.  Between that.  They can never follow the moderate way. It is a great misfortune for us.
 
33
00:09:11,180 --> 00:09:28,580
We Indians do it regularly.  If we find any pious man.  We make them God.  And sometimes when we find any good man.  We make them worst people.  We never hesitate to do it.  So this moral character of us.  In there we find this type of people. Which things they stolen from different places.
 
34
00:09:28,740 --> 00:09:43,940
Added in their scriptures.  We can never accept them as prophecy.  Never accept them as words of Allah.  Just say they are interpolation.  They did not and will never give you the responsibility. To say their books and their religion as authentic.
 
35
00:09:44,100 --> 00:10:00,780
They have never said that these are God's words.  They say themselves.  The Omnics among them.  You all know about them.  The six philosophy they have.  It is never said in anywhere of them that these are God's words. In everywhere it is said that Veda is creator.
 
36
00:10:01,020 --> 00:10:16,580
They think that mantras or spells create everything.  How much they say.  It is excessive.  These are nothing.  By reading you will see that they are nothing.  Seeing mountain they become mad and praise it. Seeing stars in the sky they become mad and praise them.
 
37
00:10:17,260 --> 00:10:36,080
They describe Ashwini stars.  Which two are they.  They themselves know.  Becoming busy about them.  Sometime calling the sun Ogni and sometime calling it Indra.  By this format they are approaching. They are not the words of true religion or not any guidance.
 
38
00:10:36,900 --> 00:10:53,120
And if you want to get guidance from them.  You have to go too far and you can hardly find it.  So those who are saying it as Allah's words.  They are doing wrong.  We will request these brothers not to do these things.  Either they should directly invite to Islam. The things which are wrong.
 
39
00:10:53,260 --> 00:11:08,760
The law of any methodology is that.  You will never invite in wrong way.  You must make them understand that your scriptures are full of fault.  They have basically no reference.  To whom you are attributing them.  Who have written them.  Who have mentioned them.  Who are they. Who are these people from you.
 
40
00:11:08,920 --> 00:11:23,000
Who are the writer of these mantras.  They are mantras.  In this it is written.  This God says.  That Goddess says.  Which God.  Is it any man or any angel.  Or what.  Who have said that.  There is no proof.  So we should not describe this type of prophecy.  Hope you have understood the subject.}}</ref>


== References ==
== References ==
Anonymous user