Satya Bhakta

Satyabhakta (Hindi: सत्यभक्त) (April 2 1897 – December 3 1985) who used the mononym, was one of the founders of the Communist Party of India December 25-28, 1925 at Kanpur (then spelled Cawnpore).

Biography

Early life

Satyabhakta’s original name was Chakhan Lal. He was born in Bharatpur district of Rajasthan, on April 2, 1897. His father Kundanlal was the principal of the Middle School run by the princely state.

He subscribed to ‘Bharat Mitra’of Calcutta, which deeply influenced Satyabhakta. Satyabhakta came from a humble back- ground and never accumulated wealth or property.

He grew up reading revolutionary papers, and learnt about Khudiram Bose, Barindra Ghosh and Aurobindo Ghosh. He was also introduced to the weekly ‘Satya Sanatan Dharma’.

He married a Dalit woman, who probably was a widow.

He came under the influence of Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi and his ‘Pratap’. He joined the underground revolution- ary movement at a young age in 1912-13, collecting explosives making bombs. He did some senseless ex- periments in explosives and got his finger blasted off. Consequently, he was under police watch for the next twenty years. He ap- preciated Sakharam Ganesh Deuskar’s‘Desher Katha’, ‘Anand Math’ of Bankimchandra and ‘Japan ka Uday’ etc.

Becoming a Gandhian

In 1916, he became a volunteer of Bharat Sevak Samaj in Haridwar Kumbh and got an opportunity to meet Gandhiji. At that time, Sabarmati Ashram had not yet come into being. Its nucleus was functioning from a village one mile away from Alice Bridge, Ahmedabad, from a hired house. Satyabhakta went there and started doing the menial jobs like filling water, running flour hand-mill, etc., learning Bangla and Gujarati languages also at the same time. There he translated Gandhiji’s ‘Sarvodaya’ and ‘Jail ke Anubhav into Hindi. He came in contact with Gandhians like Kaka Kalelkar, Vinoba Bhave, Mahadev Desai and oth- ers. Gandhiji wanted him to stay in the Ashram per- manently but Satyabhakta had his own ideas and did not fully agree with the concept of Ahimsa etc. Staying there from 1918 to 1920, he attended Bombay session of the Congress. He began to write from 1916, his first article being life of Dhondo Keshav Karve, then several biog- raphies, articles in nationalist papers such as Saraswati, Maryada, Hitkarini, Pratibha and others. He worked in Bhavishya of Pt Sundarlal, coming in contact with leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, others.

In contact with Communism

While woking in ‘Maryada’ of Krishna Kant Malaviya, Satyabhakta joined non-cooperation movement in 1921. But soon getting disillusioned with Congress politics, he joined Rajasthan Seva Sangh. Then he came in contact with communist views and began to read about and appreciate Rus- sian revolution. Satyabhakta corre- sponded with Sylvia Pankhurst, editor of Work- ers’ Dreadnought, organ of Communist Party of Great Britain. Through her, he got lot of Marxist literature. At the beginning of 1923, he joined Radha Mohan Gokulji in his leftwing weekly called ‘Pranveer’ from Nagpur.

He edited it for eight months and brought out its Independence Day Spe- cial. He also attracted attention as a correspon- dent on writing about S. A. Dange. Towards 1923-end, Satyabhakta returned to Kanpur and took part in workers’ activities. There was a strike at the begin- ning of 1924 of workers of Victoria Cotton Mills, last- ing for one and half months. Satyabhakta in a letter in DainikVartman of April 31, 1924, provided details of the strike. He wrote that Mazdoor Sabha had collected two thou- sand rupees. He further wrote: “…there may be people in the Kanpur labor movement who believe in Communist or Bolshevik theories…”. British gov- ernment raised bogey of Bolshevism to cover up its anti-Communist acts such as Kanpur Bolshevik Conspiracy Case, he said.

Idea of formation of CPI

He began to think in terms of forming Commu- nist party and convening an all India conference of Communists. Of course, many others in India, in- cluding Bombay Group, were thinking along simi- lar lines. He announced intention to set up ‘Indian Communist Party’ in the Hindi daily Aj of July 12, 1924. He referred to Rus- sia and to the Communist rule there, asserting that Communism was the only path uplifting unhappy and exploited people. He called upon all wage earners, peasants, workers, clerks, school masters, rail- way and postal employees, peons etc. to join the party. He signed the letter as secretary of ‘Bhartiya Samyawadi Dal’. His announcement appeared in English daily ‘Indian World’. In September 1925, Satyabhakta published two 4-page leaflets, in Hindi and English, titled ‘Indian Communist Party’, with a membership form printed at the end. The objects of Communist Party were defined as “es- tablishment of complete swarajya and society based upon common owner- ship… of means and instruments of production and distribution…” He called for the abolition of zamindari system. He stated that the toiling people must organize themselves. The party will work to change the present system. Government of United Provinces banned both these pamphlets by a no- tification in the gazette of October 11, 1924. Satyabhakta protested against it through a letter to ‘Vartman’ (Kanpur) of October 20, 1924: “It is cowardice of the govern- ment to ban the rules of the party without declaring the party itself illegal.” He was a Communist,and would face all the conse- quences. In Aj of November 5, 1924, he reiterated, “We have the right to organize a communist party.” He said that the Congress had not defined swaraj, changes in social order have not been clarified, and the National Congress was strongly under the in- fluence of rich people. Communists wanted to eliminate the difference between the rich and the poor. He quoted Lenin on this question. British government closely watched his activi- ties, raided his house and his Socialist Bookshop sev- eral times and confiscated publications. His name was originally included among 13 people selected for Kanpur Conspiracy Case, but was dropped for want of evidence. ‘Pranveer’ published the ‘first quarterly report’ of ‘Indian Communist Party’ in a brief letter signed by Satyabhakta as secre- tary. He mentioned that party had 78 members by that time, mostly in Kanpur, and Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. Prominent members were: Maulana Hasrat Mohani, Narayan Prasad Arora (MLC), Rama Shankar Awasthi (Editor, Vartman), Radha Mohan Gokulji, Ram Gopal Vidyalankar (Editor, Pranveer), etc. Satyabhakta was in con- tact with the revolutionary organization HSRA, though not agreeing with everything. In the raid on his office, police seized copies of ‘Volunteer’ and ‘Revolutionary’, organs of HRA in UP. In October 1924, Satyabhakta wrote a 16- page pamphlet ‘Bol- shevism Kya Hai’ (What is Bolshevism) in question- answer form. Mukut Bihari, editor of Swadesh, was arrested in Gorakhpur while selling this pam- phlet. Satyabhakta strongly protested. Mukut Bihari was released in March 1925. A second ‘quarterly re- port’ of Indian Communist Party was published in March 1925, which claimed a membership of 215, including 139 from UP. The same month, Saklatvala, British Com- munist MP, communicated with Satyabhakta. A leaflet issued by Satyabhakta (June 18, 1925) titled‘The Future Program of Indian Com- munist Party’, mentioned for the first time that an Indian Communist confer- ence would be held at the same time as Congress ses- sion in Kanpur at 1925-end. Police again raided his bookshop on July 7, 1925 and seized communist lit- erature of CPGB. Hindustan Times of July 16, 1925 reported with the heading ‘Communist Party: police raid uncalled for, secretary explains’. Satyabhakta commented that India has been re- duced to the level of a prison. The police and the Brit- ish intelligence suspected that the Communist Party set up at Kanpur by Satyabhakta was a direct result of Hindustan Republican Association, with himself as figurehead. In his documents, Satyabhakta tried to pro- vide aims, objects and programs of Communist Party more clearly.

Response to Satyabhakta’s call

S. V. Ghate recorded that after Kanpur Conspiracy Case, the “’Socialist’ Group” of Bombay had considered formation of a party. In the meantime, they came across Satyabhakta’s announce- ment, and decided to join the Kanpur conference. JP Bagerhatta also decided to do the same. KN Joglekar records that he and Bombay Group came to know about it through VH Joshi, who was going to meet SA Dange in Kanpur Jail. He wrote: “We, the Bombay Group, gave support to the idea and decided to partici- pate in as large a number as possible.” Joglekar said that Satyabhakta was help- ful to the defence committee in Kanpur Conspiracy Case. Muzaffar Ahmed wrote that Satyabhakta con- tacted him through letter in Almora requesting par- ticipation in Kanpur Communist conference. Muzaffar Ahmed reached Kanpur and found Ghate, Joglekar, Nimbkar etc present. The initiative of Satyabhakta and others met with a positive re- sponse not only from Bombay and Bengal but also from Punjab and Madras. Thus, according to Ghate, the work of bring- ing together the Communist groups at Kanpur was done by Satyabhakta. Satyabhakta formed a committee and got help from Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi and his paper ‘Pratap’. Vidyarthi was a leftist and helped the Communists. As is well-known, Kanpur foundation con- ference of CPI was a grand success. The ‘Indian Com- munist Party’ of Satyabhakta was dissolved and a formal Communist Party of India was founded. Satyabhakta wrote that he did not feel any dissatisfaction about this.

Satyabhakta’s differences and departure

Satyabhakta was elected to CEC (central executive committee) formed at Kanpur conference. But he soon developed differences, particularly on the ques- tion of internationalism, and resigned from CEC. Later he went out of the party, though remained a sympathetic nationalist. Actually, there had been certain divergence of views between him and CPI at Kanpur on the na- ture of party, which he himself had initiated. This led to his gradual diver- gence from Communist movement. In Satyabhakta’s perception, it should have been an ‘Indian Communist Party’ rather than Communist Party of India. It was not a question of just a name but of a whole approach.He said he was not opposed to the Com- munist International (Comintern) and favoured a friendly relation with it, but observed that the party should not be tied to it. Satyabhakta published the first number of his 8- page Hindi fortnightly ‘Samyavadi’ on January 1, 1926 after the conference. He wanted to publish it at the time of the conference but could not do so. It con- tained articles by Singaravelu, Maulana Azad Subhani and Radha Mohan Gokulji, besides ar- ticles on Russia and Lenin. Both its initial numbers were seized by the British police. His book ‘Agle SaatSaal’ (next seven years) was also banned and seized.

He later on worked in various Hindi journals like ‘Chand’, ‘Pranveer’, etc but had to leave them. He gradually became a desti- tute. He joined a spiritual ashram in Mathura in 1941 and other places, but he continued writing. He wrote about hundred small biographies of prominent Indian and for- eign historical figures. He also wrote the history of In- dian freedom movement from 1857 to 1947. He joined ‘Akhand Jyoti Ashram’ but never partici- pated in their daily prayers and ‘aarti’ etc. He contin- ued to believe in his own interpretation of communism.

Even 46 years after the events, he made it clear that he had no quarrel with the workers of the CPI.

Death

Satyabhakta died on December 3, 1985 as a destitute in the Ashram, nearing the age of 90. He deserves his due in the his- tory of the Communist movement in India.

Writings

• साम्यवाद का संदेश (The message of Communism), 1934