From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia

Template:General geometry

An illustration of Desargues' theorem, a result in Euclidean and projective geometry

Geometry (Template:Etymology; Template:Etymology) is, with arithmetic, one of the oldest branches of mathematics. It is concerned with properties of space that are related with distance, shape, size, and relative position of figures.[1] A mathematician who works in the field of geometry is called a geometer.

Until the 19th century, geometry was almost exclusively devoted to Euclidean geometry,[lower-alpha 1] which includes the notions of point, line, plane, distance, angle, surface, and curve, as fundamental concepts.[2]

During the 19th century several discoveries enlarged dramatically the scope of geometry. One of the oldest such discoveries is Gauss' Theorema Egregium ("remarkable theorem") that asserts roughly that the Gaussian curvature of a surface is independent from any specific embedding in a Euclidean space. This implies that surfaces can be studied intrinsically, that is, as stand-alone spaces, and has been expanded into the theory of manifolds and Riemannian geometry.

Later in the 19th century, it appeared that geometries without the parallel postulate (non-Euclidean geometries) can be developed without introducing any contradiction. The geometry that underlies general relativity is a famous application of non-Euclidean geometry.

Since then, the scope of geometry has been greatly expanded, and the field has been split in many subfields that depend on the underlying methods—differential geometry, algebraic geometry, computational geometry, algebraic topology, discrete geometry (also known as combinatorial geometry), etc.—or on the properties of Euclidean spaces that are disregarded—projective geometry that consider only alignment of points but not distance and parallelism, affine geometry that omits the concept of angle and distance, finite geometry that omits continuity, and others.

Originally developed to model the physical world, geometry has applications in almost all sciences, and also in art, architecture, and other activities that are related to graphics.[3] Geometry also has applications in areas of mathematics that are apparently unrelated. For example, methods of algebraic geometry are fundamental in Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, a problem that was stated in terms of elementary arithmetic, and remained unsolved for several centuries.


A European and an Arab practicing geometry in the 15th century

The earliest recorded beginnings of geometry can be traced to ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt in the 2nd millennium BC.[4][5] Early geometry was a collection of empirically discovered principles concerning lengths, angles, areas, and volumes, which were developed to meet some practical need in surveying, construction, astronomy, and various crafts. The earliest known texts on geometry are the Egyptian Rhind Papyrus (2000–1800 BC) and Moscow Papyrus (c. 1890 BC), and the Babylonian clay tablets, such as Plimpton 322 (1900 BC). For example, the Moscow Papyrus gives a formula for calculating the volume of a truncated pyramid, or frustum.[6] Later clay tablets (350–50 BC) demonstrate that Babylonian astronomers implemented trapezoid procedures for computing Jupiter's position and motion within time-velocity space. These geometric procedures anticipated the Oxford Calculators, including the mean speed theorem, by 14 centuries.[7] South of Egypt the ancient Nubians established a system of geometry including early versions of sun clocks.[8][9]

In the 7th century BC, the Greek mathematician Thales of Miletus used geometry to solve problems such as calculating the height of pyramids and the distance of ships from the shore. He is credited with the first use of deductive reasoning applied to geometry, by deriving four corollaries to Thales' theorem.[10] Pythagoras established the Pythagorean School, which is credited with the first proof of the Pythagorean theorem,[11] though the statement of the theorem has a long history.[12][13] Eudoxus (408–c. 355 BC) developed the method of exhaustion, which allowed the calculation of areas and volumes of curvilinear figures,[14] as well as a theory of ratios that avoided the problem of incommensurable magnitudes, which enabled subsequent geometers to make significant advances. Around 300 BC, geometry was revolutionized by Euclid, whose Elements, widely considered the most successful and influential textbook of all time,[15] introduced mathematical rigor through the axiomatic method and is the earliest example of the format still used in mathematics today, that of definition, axiom, theorem, and proof. Although most of the contents of the Elements were already known, Euclid arranged them into a single, coherent logical framework.[16] The Elements was known to all educated people in the West until the middle of the 20th century and its contents are still taught in geometry classes today.[17] Archimedes (c. 287–212 BC) of Syracuse used the method of exhaustion to calculate the area under the arc of a parabola with the summation of an infinite series, and gave remarkably accurate approximations of pi.[18] He also studied the spiral bearing his name and obtained formulas for the volumes of surfaces of revolution.

Woman teaching geometry. Illustration at the beginning of a medieval translation of Euclid's Elements, (c. 1310).

Indian mathematicians also made many important contributions in geometry. The Satapatha Brahmana (3rd century BC) contains rules for ritual geometric constructions that are similar to the Sulba Sutras.[19] According to (Hayashi 2005, p. 363), the Śulba Sūtras contain "the earliest extant verbal expression of the Pythagorean Theorem in the world, although it had already been known to the Old Babylonians. They contain lists of Pythagorean triples,[20] which are particular cases of Diophantine equations.[21] In the Bakhshali manuscript, there is a handful of geometric problems (including problems about volumes of irregular solids). The Bakhshali manuscript also "employs a decimal place value system with a dot for zero."[22] Aryabhata's Aryabhatiya (499) includes the computation of areas and volumes. Brahmagupta wrote his astronomical work Brāhma Sphuṭa Siddhānta in 628. Chapter 12, containing 66 Sanskrit verses, was divided into two sections: "basic operations" (including cube roots, fractions, ratio and proportion, and barter) and "practical mathematics" (including mixture, mathematical series, plane figures, stacking bricks, sawing of timber, and piling of grain).[23] In the latter section, he stated his famous theorem on the diagonals of a cyclic quadrilateral. Chapter 12 also included a formula for the area of a cyclic quadrilateral (a generalization of Heron's formula), as well as a complete description of rational triangles (i.e. triangles with rational sides and rational areas).[23]

In the Middle Ages, mathematics in medieval Islam contributed to the development of geometry, especially algebraic geometry.[24][25] Al-Mahani (b. 853) conceived the idea of reducing geometrical problems such as duplicating the cube to problems in algebra.[26] Thābit ibn Qurra (known as Thebit in Latin) (836–901) dealt with arithmetic operations applied to ratios of geometrical quantities, and contributed to the development of analytic geometry.[27] Omar Khayyám (1048–1131) found geometric solutions to cubic equations.[28] The theorems of Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), Omar Khayyam and Nasir al-Din al-Tusi on quadrilaterals, including the Lambert quadrilateral and Saccheri quadrilateral, were early results in hyperbolic geometry, and along with their alternative postulates, such as Playfair's axiom, these works had a considerable influence on the development of non-Euclidean geometry among later European geometers, including Witelo (c. 1230–c. 1314), Gersonides (1288–1344), Alfonso, John Wallis, and Giovanni Girolamo Saccheri.[dubious ][29]

In the early 17th century, there were two important developments in geometry. The first was the creation of analytic geometry, or geometry with coordinates and equations, by René Descartes (1596–1650) and Pierre de Fermat (1601–1665).[30] This was a necessary precursor to the development of calculus and a precise quantitative science of physics.[31] The second geometric development of this period was the systematic study of projective geometry by Girard Desargues (1591–1661).[32] Projective geometry studies properties of shapes which are unchanged under projections and sections, especially as they relate to artistic perspective.[33]

Two developments in geometry in the 19th century changed the way it had been studied previously.[34] These were the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries by Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky, János Bolyai and Carl Friedrich Gauss and of the formulation of symmetry as the central consideration in the Erlangen Programme of Felix Klein (which generalized the Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries). Two of the master geometers of the time were Bernhard Riemann (1826–1866), working primarily with tools from mathematical analysis, and introducing the Riemann surface, and Henri Poincaré, the founder of algebraic topology and the geometric theory of dynamical systems. As a consequence of these major changes in the conception of geometry, the concept of "space" became something rich and varied, and the natural background for theories as different as complex analysis and classical mechanics.[35]

Main concepts[edit]

The following are some of the most important concepts in geometry.[2][36][37]


An illustration of Euclid's parallel postulate

Euclid took an abstract approach to geometry in his Elements,[38] one of the most influential books ever written.[39] Euclid introduced certain axioms, or postulates, expressing primary or self-evident properties of points, lines, and planes.[40] He proceeded to rigorously deduce other properties by mathematical reasoning. The characteristic feature of Euclid's approach to geometry was its rigor, and it has come to be known as axiomatic or synthetic geometry.[41] At the start of the 19th century, the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries by Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky (1792–1856), János Bolyai (1802–1860), Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777–1855) and others[42] led to a revival of interest in this discipline, and in the 20th century, David Hilbert (1862–1943) employed axiomatic reasoning in an attempt to provide a modern foundation of geometry.[43]



Points are generally considered fundamental objects for building geometry. They may be defined by the properties that thay must have, as in Euclid's definition as "that which has no part",[44] or in synthetic geometry. In modern mathematics, they are generally defined as elements of a set called space, which is itself axiomatically defined.

With these modern definitions, every geometric shape is defined as a set of points; this is not the case in synthetic geometry, where a line is another fundamental object that is not viewed as the set of the points through which it passes.

However, there has modern geometries, in which points are not primitive objects, or even without points.[45][46] One of the oldest such geometries is Whitehead's point-free geometry, formulated by Alfred North Whitehead in 1919–1920.


Euclid described a line as "breadthless length" which "lies equally with respect to the points on itself".[44] In modern mathematics, given the multitude of geometries, the concept of a line is closely tied to the way the geometry is described. For instance, in analytic geometry, a line in the plane is often defined as the set of points whose coordinates satisfy a given linear equation,[47] but in a more abstract setting, such as incidence geometry, a line may be an independent object, distinct from the set of points which lie on it.[48] In differential geometry, a geodesic is a generalization of the notion of a line to curved spaces.[49]


In Euclidean geometry a plane is a flat, two-dimensional surface that extends infinitely;[44] the definitions for other types of geometries are generalizations of that. Planes are used in many areas of geometry. For instance, planes can be studied as a topological surface without reference to distances or angles;[50] it can be studied as an affine space, where collinearity and ratios can be studied but not distances;[51] it can be studied as the complex plane using techniques of complex analysis;[52] and so on.


Euclid defines a plane angle as the inclination to each other, in a plane, of two lines which meet each other, and do not lie straight with respect to each other.[44] In modern terms, an angle is the figure formed by two rays, called the sides of the angle, sharing a common endpoint, called the vertex of the angle.[53]

Acute (a), obtuse (b), and straight (c) angles. The acute and obtuse angles are also known as oblique angles.

In Euclidean geometry, angles are used to study polygons and triangles, as well as forming an object of study in their own right.[44] The study of the angles of a triangle or of angles in a unit circle forms the basis of trigonometry.[54]

In differential geometry and calculus, the angles between plane curves or space curves or surfaces can be calculated using the derivative.[55][56]


A curve is a 1-dimensional object that may be straight (like a line) or not; curves in 2-dimensional space are called plane curves and those in 3-dimensional space are called space curves.[57]

In topology, a curve is defined by a function from an interval of the real numbers to another space.[50] In differential geometry, the same definition is used, but the defining function is required to be differentiable [58] Algebraic geometry studies algebraic curves, which are defined as algebraic varieties of dimension one.[59]


A sphere is a surface that can be defined parametrically (by x = r sin θ cos φ, y = r sin θ sin φ, z = r cos θ) or implicitly (by x2 + y2 + z2r2 = 0.)

A surface is a two-dimensional object, such as a sphere or paraboloid.[60] In differential geometry[58] and topology,[50] surfaces are described by two-dimensional 'patches' (or neighborhoods) that are assembled by diffeomorphisms or homeomorphisms, respectively. In algebraic geometry, surfaces are described by polynomial equations.[59]


A manifold is a generalization of the concepts of curve and surface. In topology, a manifold is a topological space where every point has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to Euclidean space.[50] In differential geometry, a differentiable manifold is a space where each neighborhood is diffeomorphic to Euclidean space.[58]

Manifolds are used extensively in physics, including in general relativity and string theory.[61]

Length, area, and volume[edit]

Length, area, and volume describe the size or extent of an object in one dimension, two dimension, and three dimensions respectively.[62]

In Euclidean geometry and analytic geometry, the length of a line segment can often be calculated by the Pythagorean theorem.[63]

Area and volume can be defined as fundamental quantities separate from length, or they can be described and calculated in terms of lengths in a plane or 3-dimensional space.[62] Mathematicians have found many explicit formulas for area and formulas for volume of various geometric objects. In calculus, area and volume can be defined in terms of integrals, such as the Riemann integral[64] or the Lebesgue integral.[65]

Metrics and measures[edit]

Visual checking of the Pythagorean theorem for the (3, 4, 5) triangle as in the Zhoubi Suanjing 500–200 BC. The Pythagorean theorem is a consequence of the Euclidean metric.

The concept of length or distance can be generalized, leading to the idea of metrics.[66] For instance, the Euclidean metric measures the distance between points in the Euclidean plane, while the hyperbolic metric measures the distance in the hyperbolic plane. Other important examples of metrics include the Lorentz metric of special relativity and the semi-Riemannian metrics of general relativity.[67]

In a different direction, the concepts of length, area and volume are extended by measure theory, which studies methods of assigning a size or measure to sets, where the measures follow rules similar to those of classical area and volume.[68]

Congruence and similarity[edit]

Congruence and similarity are concepts that describe when two shapes have similar characteristics.[69] In Euclidean geometry, similarity is used to describe objects that have the same shape, while congruence is used to describe objects that are the same in both size and shape.[70] Hilbert, in his work on creating a more rigorous foundation for geometry, treated congruence as an undefined term whose properties are defined by axioms.

Congruence and similarity are generalized in transformation geometry, which studies the properties of geometric objects that are preserved by different kinds of transformations.[71]

Compass and straightedge constructions[edit]

Classical geometers paid special attention to constructing geometric objects that had been described in some other way. Classically, the only instruments used in most geometric constructions are the compass and straightedge.[lower-alpha 2] Also, every construction had to be complete in a finite number of steps. However, some problems turned out to be difficult or impossible to solve by these means alone, and ingenious constructions using neusis, parabolas and other curves, or mechanical devices, were found.


Where the traditional geometry allowed dimensions 1 (a line), 2 (a plane) and 3 (our ambient world conceived of as three-dimensional space), mathematicians and physicists have used higher dimensions for nearly two centuries.[72] One example of a mathematical use for higher dimensions is the configuration space of a physical system, which has a dimension equal to the system's degrees of freedom. For instance, the configuration of a screw can be described by five coordinates.[73]

In general topology, the concept of dimension has been extended from natural numbers, to infinite dimension (Hilbert spaces, for example) and positive real numbers (in fractal geometry).[74] In algebraic geometry, the dimension of an algebraic variety has received a number of apparently different definitions, which are all equivalent in the most common cases.[75]


The theme of symmetry in geometry is nearly as old as the science of geometry itself.[76] Symmetric shapes such as the circle, regular polygons and platonic solids held deep significance for many ancient philosophers[77] and were investigated in detail before the time of Euclid.[40] Symmetric patterns occur in nature and were artistically rendered in a multitude of forms, including the graphics of Leonardo da Vinci, M. C. Escher, and others.[78] In the second half of the 19th century, the relationship between symmetry and geometry came under intense scrutiny. Felix Klein's Erlangen program proclaimed that, in a very precise sense, symmetry, expressed via the notion of a transformation group, determines what geometry is.[79] Symmetry in classical Euclidean geometry is represented by congruences and rigid motions, whereas in projective geometry an analogous role is played by collineations, geometric transformations that take straight lines into straight lines.[80] However it was in the new geometries of Bolyai and Lobachevsky, Riemann, Clifford and Klein, and Sophus Lie that Klein's idea to 'define a geometry via its symmetry group' found its inspiration.[81] Both discrete and continuous symmetries play prominent roles in geometry, the former in topology and geometric group theory,[82][83] the latter in Lie theory and Riemannian geometry.[84][85]

A different type of symmetry is the principle of duality in projective geometry, among other fields. This meta-phenomenon can roughly be described as follows: in any theorem, exchange point with plane, join with meet, lies in with contains, and the result is an equally true theorem.[86] A similar and closely related form of duality exists between a vector space and its dual space.[87]

Contemporary geometry[edit]

Euclidean geometry[edit]

Euclidean geometry is geometry in its classical sense.[88] As it models the space of the physical world, it is used in many scientific areas, such as mechanics, astronomy, crystallography,[89] and many technical fields, such as engineering,[90] architecture,[91] geodesy,[92] aerodynamics,[93] and navigation.[94] The mandatory educational curriculum of the majority of nations includes the study of Euclidean concepts such as points, lines, planes, angles, triangles, congruence, similarity, solid figures, circles, and analytic geometry.[36]

Differential geometry[edit]

Differential geometry uses tools from calculus to study problems involving curvature.

Differential geometry uses techniques of calculus and linear algebra to study problems in geometry.[95] It has applications in physics,[96] econometrics,[97] and bioinformatics,[98] among others.

In particular, differential geometry is of importance to mathematical physics due to Albert Einstein's general relativity postulation that the universe is curved.[99] Differential geometry can either be intrinsic (meaning that the spaces it considers are smooth manifolds whose geometric structure is governed by a Riemannian metric, which determines how distances are measured near each point) or extrinsic (where the object under study is a part of some ambient flat Euclidean space).[100]

Non-Euclidean geometry[edit]

Euclidean geometry was not the only historical form of geometry studied. Spherical geometry has long been used by astronomers, astrologers, and navigators.[101]

Immanuel Kant argued that there is only one, absolute, geometry, which is known to be true a priori by an inner faculty of mind: Euclidean geometry was synthetic a priori.[102] This view was at first somewhat challenged by thinkers such as Saccheri, then finally overturned by the revolutionary discovery of non-Euclidean geometry in the works of Bolyai, Lobachevsky, and Gauss (who never published his theory).[103] They demonstrated that ordinary Euclidean space is only one possibility for development of geometry. A broad vision of the subject of geometry was then expressed by Riemann in his 1867 inauguration lecture Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen (On the hypotheses on which geometry is based),[104] published only after his death. Riemann's new idea of space proved crucial in Albert Einstein's general relativity theory. Riemannian geometry, which considers very general spaces in which the notion of length is defined, is a mainstay of modern geometry.[81]


A thickening of the trefoil knot

Topology is the field concerned with the properties of continuous mappings,[105] and can be considered a generalization of Euclidean geometry.[106] In practice, topology often means dealing with large-scale properties of spaces, such as connectedness and compactness.[50]

The field of topology, which saw massive development in the 20th century, is in a technical sense a type of transformation geometry, in which transformations are homeomorphisms.[107] This has often been expressed in the form of the saying 'topology is rubber-sheet geometry'. Subfields of topology include geometric topology, differential topology, algebraic topology and general topology.[108]

Algebraic geometry[edit]

The field of algebraic geometry developed from the Cartesian geometry of co-ordinates.[109] It underwent periodic periods of growth, accompanied by the creation and study of projective geometry, birational geometry, algebraic varieties, and commutative algebra, among other topics.[110] From the late 1950s through the mid-1970s it had undergone major foundational development, largely due to work of Jean-Pierre Serre and Alexander Grothendieck.[110] This led to the introduction of schemes and greater emphasis on topological methods, including various cohomology theories. One of seven Millennium Prize problems, the Hodge conjecture, is a question in algebraic geometry.[111] Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem uses advanced methods of algebraic geometry for solving a long-standing problem of number theory.

In general, algebraic geometry studies geometry through the use of concepts in commutative algebra such as multivariate polynomials.[112] It has applications in many areas, including cryptography[113] and string theory.[114]

Complex geometry[edit]

Complex geometry studies the nature of geometric structures modelled on, or arising out of, the complex plane.[115][116][117] Complex geometry lies at the intersection of differential geometry, algebraic geometry, and analysis of several complex variables, and has found applications to string theory and mirror symmetry.[118]

Complex geometry first appeared as a distinct area of study in the work of Bernhard Riemann in his study of Riemann surfaces.[119][120][121] Work in the spirit of Riemann was carried out by the Italian school of algebraic geometry in the early 1900s. Contemporary treatment of complex geometry began with the work of Jean-Pierre Serre, who introduced the concept of sheaves to the subject, and illuminated the relations between complex geometry and algebraic geometry.[122][123] The primary objects of study in complex geometry are complex manifolds, complex algebraic varieties, and complex analytic varieties, and holomorphic vector bundles and coherent sheaves over these spaces. Special examples of spaces studied in complex geometry include Riemann surfaces, and Calabi–Yau manifolds, and these spaces find uses in string theory. In particular, worldsheets of strings are modelled by Riemann surfaces, and superstring theory predicts that the extra 6 dimensions of 10 dimensional spacetime may be modelled by Calabi–Yau manifolds.

Discrete geometry[edit]

Discrete geometry includes the study of various sphere packings.

Discrete geometry is a subject that has close connections with convex geometry.[124][125][126] It is concerned mainly with questions of relative position of simple geometric objects, such as points, lines and circles. Examples include the study of sphere packings, triangulations, the Kneser-Poulsen conjecture, etc.[127][128] It shares many methods and principles with combinatorics.

Computational geometry[edit]

Computational geometry deals with algorithms and their implementations for manipulating geometrical objects. Important problems historically have included the travelling salesman problem, minimum spanning trees, hidden-line removal, and linear programming.[129]

Although being a young area of geometry, it has many applications in computer vision, image processing, computer-aided design, medical imaging, etc.[130]

Geometric group theory[edit]

The Cayley graph of the free group on two generators a and b

Geometric group theory uses large-scale geometric techniques to study finitely generated groups.[131] It is closely connected to low-dimensional topology, such as in Grigori Perelman's proof of the Geometrization conjecture, which included the proof of the Poincaré conjecture, a Millennium Prize Problem.[132]

Geometric group theory often revolves around the Cayley graph, which is a geometric representation of a group. Other important topics include quasi-isometries, Gromov-hyperbolic groups, and right angled Artin groups.[131][133]

Convex geometry[edit]

Convex geometry investigates convex shapes in the Euclidean space and its more abstract analogues, often using techniques of real analysis and discrete mathematics.[134] It has close connections to convex analysis, optimization and functional analysis and important applications in number theory.

Convex geometry dates back to antiquity.[134] Archimedes gave the first known precise definition of convexity. The isoperimetric problem, a recurring concept in convex geometry, was studied by the Greeks as well, including Zenodorus. Archimedes, Plato, Euclid, and later Kepler and Coxeter all studied convex polytopes and their properties. From the 19th century on, mathematicians have studied other areas of convex mathematics, including higher-dimensional polytopes, volume and surface area of convex bodies, Gaussian curvature, algorithms, tilings and lattices.


Geometry has found applications in many fields, some of which are described below.


Bou Inania Madrasa, Fes, Morocco, zellige mosaic tiles forming elaborate geometric tessellations

Mathematics and art are related in a variety of ways. For instance, the theory of perspective showed that there is more to geometry than just the metric properties of figures: perspective is the origin of projective geometry.[135]

Artists have long used concepts of proportion in design. Vitruvius developed a complicated theory of ideal proportions for the human figure.[136] These concepts have been used and adapted by artists from Michelangelo to modern comic book artists.[137]

The golden ratio is a particular proportion that has had a controversial role in art. Often claimed to be the most aesthetically pleasing ratio of lengths, it is frequently stated to be incorporated into famous works of art, though the most reliable and unambiguous examples were made deliberately by artists aware of this legend.[138]

Tilings, or tessellations, have been used in art throughout history. Islamic art makes frequent use of tessellations, as did the art of M. C. Escher.[139] Escher's work also made use of hyperbolic geometry.

Cézanne advanced the theory that all images can be built up from the sphere, the cone, and the cylinder. This is still used in art theory today, although the exact list of shapes varies from author to author.[140][141]


Geometry has many applications in architecture. In fact, it has been said that geometry lies at the core of architectural design.[142][143] Applications of geometry to architecture include the use of projective geometry to create forced perspective,[144] the use of conic sections in constructing domes and similar objects,[91] the use of tessellations,[91] and the use of symmetry.[91]


The field of astronomy, especially as it relates to mapping the positions of stars and planets on the celestial sphere and describing the relationship between movements of celestial bodies, have served as an important source of geometric problems throughout history.[145]

Riemannian geometry and pseudo-Riemannian geometry are used in general relativity.[146] String theory makes use of several variants of geometry,[147] as does quantum information theory.[148]

Other fields of mathematics[edit]

The Pythagoreans discovered that the sides of a triangle could have incommensurable lengths.

Calculus was strongly influenced by geometry.[30] For instance, the introduction of coordinates by René Descartes and the concurrent developments of algebra marked a new stage for geometry, since geometric figures such as plane curves could now be represented analytically in the form of functions and equations. This played a key role in the emergence of infinitesimal calculus in the 17th century. Analytic geometry continues to be a mainstay of pre-calculus and calculus curriculum.[149][150]

Another important area of application is number theory.[151] In ancient Greece the Pythagoreans considered the role of numbers in geometry. However, the discovery of incommensurable lengths contradicted their philosophical views.[152] Since the 19th century, geometry has been used for solving problems in number theory, for example through the geometry of numbers or, more recently, scheme theory, which is used in Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.[153]

See also[edit]


Related topics[edit]

Other fields[edit]


  1. Until the 19th century, geometry was dominated by the assumption that all geometric constructions were Euclidean. In the 19th century and later, this was challenged by the development of hyperbolic geometry by Lobachevsky and other non-Euclidean geometries by Gauss and others. It was then realised that implicitly non-Euclidean geometry had appeared throughout history, including the work of Desargues in the 17th century, all the way back to the implicit use of spherical geometry to understand the Earth geodesy and to navigate the oceans since antiquity.
  2. The ancient Greeks had some constructions using other instruments.
  1. Vincenzo De Risi (2015). Mathematizing Space: The Objects of Geometry from Antiquity to the Early Modern Age. Birkhäuser. pp. 1–. ISBN 978-3-319-12102-4.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Tabak, John (2014). Geometry: the language of space and form. Infobase Publishing. p. xiv. ISBN 978-0-8160-4953-0.
  3. Walter A. Meyer (2006). Geometry and Its Applications. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-047803-6.
  4. J. Friberg, "Methods and traditions of Babylonian mathematics. Plimpton 322, Pythagorean triples, and the Babylonian triangle parameter equations", Historia Mathematica, 8, 1981, pp. 277–318.
  5. Neugebauer, Otto (1969) [1957]. "Chap. IV Egyptian Mathematics and Astronomy". The Exact Sciences in Antiquity (2 ed.). Dover Publications. pp. 71–96. ISBN 978-0-486-22332-2..
  6. (Boyer 1991, "Egypt" p. 19)
  7. Ossendrijver, Mathieu (29 January 2016). "Ancient Babylonian astronomers calculated Jupiter's position from the area under a time-velocity graph". Science. 351 (6272): 482–484. Bibcode:2016Sci...351..482O. doi:10.1126/science.aad8085. PMID 26823423. S2CID 206644971.
  8. Depuydt, Leo (1 January 1998). "Gnomons at Meroë and Early Trigonometry". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 84: 171–180. doi:10.2307/3822211. JSTOR 3822211.
  9. Slayman, Andrew (27 May 1998). "Neolithic Skywatchers". Archaeology Magazine Archive. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 17 April 2011.
  10. (Boyer 1991, "Ionia and the Pythagoreans" p. 43)
  11. Eves, Howard, An Introduction to the History of Mathematics, Saunders, 1990, ISBN 0-03-029558-0.
  12. Kurt Von Fritz (1945). "The Discovery of Incommensurability by Hippasus of Metapontum". The Annals of Mathematics.
  13. James R. Choike (1980). "The Pentagram and the Discovery of an Irrational Number". The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal.
  14. (Boyer 1991, "The Age of Plato and Aristotle" p. 92)
  15. (Boyer 1991, "Euclid of Alexandria" p. 119)
  16. (Boyer 1991, "Euclid of Alexandria" p. 104)
  17. Howard Eves, An Introduction to the History of Mathematics, Saunders, 1990, ISBN 0-03-029558-0 p. 141: "No work, except The Bible, has been more widely used...."
  18. O'Connor, J.J.; Robertson, E.F. (February 1996). "A history of calculus". University of St Andrews. Archived from the original on 15 July 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007.
  19. Staal, Frits (1999). "Greek and Vedic Geometry". Journal of Indian Philosophy. 27 (1–2): 105–127. doi:10.1023/A:1004364417713. S2CID 170894641.
  20. Pythagorean triples are triples of integers with the property: . Thus, , , etc.
  21. (Cooke 2005, p. 198): "The arithmetic content of the Śulva Sūtras consists of rules for finding Pythagorean triples such as (3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), (8, 15, 17), and (12, 35, 37). It is not certain what practical use these arithmetic rules had. The best conjecture is that they were part of religious ritual. A Hindu home was required to have three fires burning at three different altars. The three altars were to be of different shapes, but all three were to have the same area. These conditions led to certain "Diophantine" problems, a particular case of which is the generation of Pythagorean triples, so as to make one square integer equal to the sum of two others."
  22. (Hayashi 2005, p. 371)
  23. 23.0 23.1 (Hayashi 2003, pp. 121–122)
  24. R. Rashed (1994), The development of Arabic mathematics: between arithmetic and algebra, p. 35 London
  25. (Boyer 1991, "The Arabic Hegemony" pp. 241–242) "Omar Khayyam (c. 1050–1123), the "tent-maker," wrote an Algebra that went beyond that of al-Khwarizmi to include equations of third degree. Like his Arab predecessors, Omar Khayyam provided for quadratic equations both arithmetic and geometric solutions; for general cubic equations, he believed (mistakenly, as the 16th century later showed), arithmetic solutions were impossible; hence he gave only geometric solutions. The scheme of using intersecting conics to solve cubics had been used earlier by Menaechmus, Archimedes, and Alhazan, but Omar Khayyam took the praiseworthy step of generalizing the method to cover all third-degree equations (having positive roots). .. For equations of higher degree than three, Omar Khayyam evidently did not envision similar geometric methods, for space does not contain more than three dimensions, ... One of the most fruitful contributions of Arabic eclecticism was the tendency to close the gap between numerical and geometric algebra. The decisive step in this direction came much later with Descartes, but Omar Khayyam was moving in this direction when he wrote, "Whoever thinks algebra is a trick in obtaining unknowns has thought it in vain. No attention should be paid to the fact that algebra and geometry are different in appearance. Algebras are geometric facts which are proved."".
  26. O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F. "Al-Mahani". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. University of St Andrews..
  27. O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F. "Al-Sabi Thabit ibn Qurra al-Harrani". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. University of St Andrews..
  28. O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F. "Omar Khayyam". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. University of St Andrews..
  29. Boris A. Rosenfeld and Adolf P. Youschkevitch (1996), "Geometry", in Roshdi Rashed, ed., Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science, Vol. 2, pp. 447–494 [470], Routledge, London and New York:

    "Three scientists, Ibn al-Haytham, Khayyam, and al-Tusi, had made the most considerable contribution to this branch of geometry whose importance came to be completely recognized only in the 19th century. In essence, their propositions concerning the properties of quadrangles which they considered, assuming that some of the angles of these figures were acute of obtuse, embodied the first few theorems of the hyperbolic and the elliptic geometries. Their other proposals showed that various geometric statements were equivalent to the Euclidean postulate V. It is extremely important that these scholars established the mutual connection between this postulate and the sum of the angles of a triangle and a quadrangle. By their works on the theory of parallel lines Arab mathematicians directly influenced the relevant investigations of their European counterparts. The first European attempt to prove the postulate on parallel lines—made by Witelo, the Polish scientists of the 13th century, while revising Ibn al-Haytham's Book of Optics (Kitab al-Manazir)—was undoubtedly prompted by Arabic sources. The proofs put forward in the 14th century by the Jewish scholar Levi ben Gerson, who lived in southern France, and by the above-mentioned Alfonso from Spain directly border on Ibn al-Haytham's demonstration. Above, we have demonstrated that Pseudo-Tusi's Exposition of Euclid had stimulated both J. Wallis's and G. Saccheri's studies of the theory of parallel lines."

  30. 30.0 30.1 Carl B. Boyer (2012). History of Analytic Geometry. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-15451-0.
  31. C.H. Edwards Jr. (2012). The Historical Development of the Calculus. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-4612-6230-5.
  32. Judith V. Field; Jeremy Gray (2012). The Geometrical Work of Girard Desargues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 43. ISBN 978-1-4613-8692-6.
  33. C. R. Wylie (2011). Introduction to Projective Geometry. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-14170-1.
  34. Jeremy Gray (2011). Worlds Out of Nothing: A Course in the History of Geometry in the 19th Century. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-85729-060-1.
  35. Eduardo Bayro-Corrochano (2018). Geometric Algebra Applications Vol. I: Computer Vision, Graphics and Neurocomputing. Springer. p. 4. ISBN 978-3-319-74830-6.
  36. 36.0 36.1 Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). "A coherent curriculum". American Educator, 26(2), 1–18.
  37. Morris Kline (1990). Mathematical Thought From Ancient to Modern Times: Volume 3. US: Oxford University Press. pp. 1010–. ISBN 978-0-19-506137-6.
  38. Victor J. Katz (2000). Using History to Teach Mathematics: An International Perspective. Cambridge University Press. pp. 45–. ISBN 978-0-88385-163-0.
  39. David Berlinski (2014). The King of Infinite Space: Euclid and His Elements. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-03863-3.
  40. 40.0 40.1 Robin Hartshorne (2013). Geometry: Euclid and Beyond. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 29–. ISBN 978-0-387-22676-7.
  41. Pat Herbst; Taro Fujita; Stefan Halverscheid; Michael Weiss (2017). The Learning and Teaching of Geometry in Secondary Schools: A Modeling Perspective. Taylor & Francis. pp. 20–. ISBN 978-1-351-97353-3.
  42. I.M. Yaglom (2012). A Simple Non-Euclidean Geometry and Its Physical Basis: An Elementary Account of Galilean Geometry and the Galilean Principle of Relativity. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-1-4612-6135-3.
  43. Audun Holme (2010). Geometry: Our Cultural Heritage. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 254–. ISBN 978-3-642-14441-7.
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 Euclid's Elements – All thirteen books in one volume, Based on Heath's translation, Green Lion Press ISBN 1-888009-18-7.
  45. Gerla, G. (1995). "Pointless Geometries" (PDF). In Buekenhout, F.; Kantor, W. (eds.). Handbook of incidence geometry: buildings and foundations. North-Holland. pp. 1015–1031. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 July 2011.
  46. Clark, Bowman L. (January 1985). "Individuals and Points". Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 26 (1): 61–75. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093870761.
  47. John Casey (1885). Analytic Geometry of the Point, Line, Circle, and Conic Sections.
  48. Buekenhout, Francis (1995), Handbook of Incidence Geometry: Buildings and Foundations, Elsevier B.V.
  49. "geodesic – definition of geodesic in English from the Oxford dictionary". Archived from the original on 15 July 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  50. 50.0 50.1 50.2 50.3 50.4 Munkres, James R. Topology. Vol. 2. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2000.
  51. Szmielew, Wanda. From affine to Euclidean geometry: An axiomatic approach. Springer, 1983.
  52. Ahlfors, Lars V. Complex analysis: an introduction to the theory of analytic functions of one complex variable. New York; London (1953).
  53. Template:SpringerEOM
  54. Gelʹfand, Izrailʹ Moiseevič, and Mark Saul. "Trigonometry." Trigonometry. Birkhäuser Boston, 2001. 1–20.
  55. Stewart, James (2012). Calculus: Early Transcendentals, 7th ed., Brooks Cole Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-538-49790-9
  56. Jost, Jürgen (2002). Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-42627-1..
  57. Baker, Henry Frederick. Principles of geometry. Vol. 2. CUP Archive, 1954.
  58. 58.0 58.1 58.2 Do Carmo, Manfredo Perdigao, and Manfredo Perdigao Do Carmo. Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Vol. 2. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-hall, 1976.
  59. 59.0 59.1 Mumford, David (1999). The Red Book of Varieties and Schemes Includes the Michigan Lectures on Curves and Their Jacobians (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-63293-1. Zbl 0945.14001.
  60. Briggs, William L., and Lyle Cochran Calculus. "Early Transcendentals." ISBN 978-0-321-57056-7.
  61. Yau, Shing-Tung; Nadis, Steve (2010). The Shape of Inner Space: String Theory and the Geometry of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02023-2.
  62. 62.0 62.1 Steven A. Treese (2018). History and Measurement of the Base and Derived Units. Springer International Publishing. pp. 101–. ISBN 978-3-319-77577-7.
  63. James W. Cannon (2017). Geometry of Lengths, Areas, and Volumes. American Mathematical Soc. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-4704-3714-5.
  64. Gilbert Strang (1991). Calculus. SIAM. ISBN 978-0-9614088-2-4.
  65. H. S. Bear (2002). A Primer of Lebesgue Integration. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-083971-1.
  66. Dmitri Burago, Yu D Burago, Sergei Ivanov, A Course in Metric Geometry, American Mathematical Society, 2001, ISBN 0-8218-2129-6.
  67. Wald, Robert M. (1984). General Relativity. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-87033-5.
  68. Terence Tao (2011). An Introduction to Measure Theory. American Mathematical Soc. ISBN 978-0-8218-6919-2.
  69. Shlomo Libeskind (2008). Euclidean and Transformational Geometry: A Deductive Inquiry. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-7637-4366-6.
  70. Mark A. Freitag (2013). Mathematics for Elementary School Teachers: A Process Approach. Cengage Learning. p. 614. ISBN 978-0-618-61008-2.
  71. George E. Martin (2012). Transformation Geometry: An Introduction to Symmetry. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4612-5680-9.
  72. Mark Blacklock (2018). The Emergence of the Fourth Dimension: Higher Spatial Thinking in the Fin de Siècle. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-875548-7.
  73. Charles Jasper Joly (1895). Papers. The Academy. pp. 62–.
  74. Roger Temam (2013). Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 367. ISBN 978-1-4612-0645-3.
  75. Bill Jacob; Tsit-Yuen Lam (1994). Recent Advances in Real Algebraic Geometry and Quadratic Forms: Proceedings of the RAGSQUAD Year, Berkeley, 1990–1991. American Mathematical Soc. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-8218-5154-8.
  76. Ian Stewart (2008). Why Beauty Is Truth: A History of Symmetry. Basic Books. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-465-08237-7.
  77. Stakhov Alexey (2009). Mathematics Of Harmony: From Euclid To Contemporary Mathematics And Computer Science. World Scientific. p. 144. ISBN 978-981-4472-57-9.
  78. Werner Hahn (1998). Symmetry as a Developmental Principle in Nature and Art. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-2363-2.
  79. Brian J. Cantwell (2002). Introduction to Symmetry Analysis. Cambridge University Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-139-43171-2.
  80. B. Rosenfeld; Bill Wiebe (2013). Geometry of Lie Groups. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 158ff. ISBN 978-1-4757-5325-7.
  81. 81.0 81.1 Peter Pesic (2007). Beyond Geometry: Classic Papers from Riemann to Einstein. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-45350-7.
  82. Michio Kaku (2012). Strings, Conformal Fields, and Topology: An Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 151. ISBN 978-1-4684-0397-8.
  83. Mladen Bestvina; Michah Sageev; Karen Vogtmann (2014). Geometric Group Theory. American Mathematical Soc. p. 132. ISBN 978-1-4704-1227-2.
  84. W-H. Steeb (1996). Continuous Symmetries, Lie Algebras, Differential Equations and Computer Algebra. World Scientific Publishing Company. ISBN 978-981-310-503-4.
  85. Charles W. Misner (2005). Directions in General Relativity: Volume 1: Proceedings of the 1993 International Symposium, Maryland: Papers in Honor of Charles Misner. Cambridge University Press. p. 272. ISBN 978-0-521-02139-5.
  86. Linnaeus Wayland Dowling (1917). Projective Geometry. McGraw-Hill book Company, Incorporated. p. 10.
  87. G. Gierz (2006). Bundles of Topological Vector Spaces and Their Duality. Springer. p. 252. ISBN 978-3-540-39437-2.
  88. Robert E. Butts; J.R. Brown (2012). Constructivism and Science: Essays in Recent German Philosophy. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 127–. ISBN 978-94-009-0959-5.
  89. Science. Moses King. 1886. pp. 181–.
  90. W. Abbot (2013). Practical Geometry and Engineering Graphics: A Textbook for Engineering and Other Students. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-94-017-2742-6.
  91. 91.0 91.1 91.2 91.3 George L. Hersey (2001). Architecture and Geometry in the Age of the Baroque. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-32783-9.
  92. P. Vanícek; E.J. Krakiwsky (2015). Geodesy: The Concepts. Elsevier. p. 23. ISBN 978-1-4832-9079-9.
  93. Russell M. Cummings; Scott A. Morton; William H. Mason; David R. McDaniel (2015). Applied Computational Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press. p. 449. ISBN 978-1-107-05374-8.
  94. Roy Williams (1998). Geometry of Navigation. Horwood Pub. ISBN 978-1-898563-46-4.
  95. Gerard Walschap (2015). Multivariable Calculus and Differential Geometry. De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-036954-0.
  96. Harley Flanders (2012). Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-13961-6.
  97. Paul Marriott; Mark Salmon (2000). Applications of Differential Geometry to Econometrics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-65116-5.
  98. Matthew He; Sergey Petoukhov (2011). Mathematics of Bioinformatics: Theory, Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-118-09952-0.
  99. P.A.M. Dirac (2016). General Theory of Relativity. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-8419-3.
  100. Nihat Ay; Jürgen Jost; Hông Vân Lê; Lorenz Schwachhöfer (2017). Information Geometry. Springer. p. 185. ISBN 978-3-319-56478-4.
  101. Boris A. Rosenfeld (2012). A History of Non-Euclidean Geometry: Evolution of the Concept of a Geometric Space. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4419-8680-1.
  102. Kline (1972) "Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times", Oxford University Press, p. 1032. Kant did not reject the logical (analytic a priori) possibility of non-Euclidean geometry, see Jeremy Gray, "Ideas of Space Euclidean, Non-Euclidean, and Relativistic", Oxford, 1989; p. 85. Some have implied that, in light of this, Kant had in fact predicted the development of non-Euclidean geometry, cf. Leonard Nelson, "Philosophy and Axiomatics," Socratic Method and Critical Philosoph, Dover, 1965, p. 164.
  103. Duncan M'Laren Young Sommerville (1919). Elements of Non-Euclidean Geometry ... Open Court. pp. 15ff.
  104. "Ueber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen". Archived from the original on 18 March 2016.
  105. Martin D. Crossley (2011). Essential Topology. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-85233-782-7.
  106. Charles Nash; Siddhartha Sen (1988). Topology and Geometry for Physicists. Elsevier. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-08-057085-3.
  107. George E. Martin (1996). Transformation Geometry: An Introduction to Symmetry. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-90636-2.
  108. J. P. May (1999). A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-51183-2.
  109. The Encyclopedia Americana: A Universal Reference Library Comprising the Arts and Sciences, Literature, History, Biography, Geography, Commerce, Etc., of the World. Scientific American Compiling Department. 1905. pp. 489–.
  110. 110.0 110.1 Suzanne C. Dieudonne (1985). History Algebraic Geometry. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-412-99371-8.
  111. James Carlson; James A. Carlson; Arthur Jaffe; Andrew Wiles (2006). The Millennium Prize Problems. American Mathematical Soc. ISBN 978-0-8218-3679-8.
  112. Robin Hartshorne (2013). Algebraic Geometry. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4757-3849-0.
  113. Everett W. Howe; Kristin E. Lauter; Judy L. Walker (2017). Algebraic Geometry for Coding Theory and Cryptography: IPAM, Los Angeles, CA, February 2016. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-63931-4.
  114. Marcos Marino; Michael Thaddeus; Ravi Vakil (2008). Enumerative Invariants in Algebraic Geometry and String Theory: Lectures given at the C.I.M.E. Summer School held in Cetraro, Italy, June 6–11, 2005. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-79814-9.
  115. Huybrechts, D. (2006). Complex geometry: an introduction. Springer Science & Business Media.
  116. Griffiths, P., & Harris, J. (2014). Principles of algebraic geometry. John Wiley & Sons.
  117. Wells, R. O. N., & García-Prada, O. (1980). Differential analysis on complex manifolds (Vol. 21980). New York: Springer.
  118. Hori, K., Thomas, R., Katz, S., Vafa, C., Pandharipande, R., Klemm, A., ... & Zaslow, E. (2003). Mirror symmetry (Vol. 1). American Mathematical Soc.
  119. Forster, O. (2012). Lectures on Riemann surfaces (Vol. 81). Springer Science & Business Media.
  120. Miranda, R. (1995). Algebraic curves and Riemann surfaces (Vol. 5). American Mathematical Soc.
  121. Donaldson, S. (2011). Riemann surfaces. Oxford University Press.
  122. Serre, J. P. (1955). Faisceaux algébriques cohérents. Annals of Mathematics, 197–278.
  123. Serre, J. P. (1956). Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique. In Annales de l'Institut Fourier (vol. 6, pp. 1–42).
  124. Jiří Matoušek (2013). Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4613-0039-7.
  125. Chuanming Zong (2006). The Cube – A Window to Convex and Discrete Geometry. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85535-8.
  126. Peter M. Gruber (2007). Convex and Discrete Geometry. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-540-71133-9.
  127. Satyan L. Devadoss; Joseph O'Rourke (2011). Discrete and Computational Geometry. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-3898-1.
  128. Károly Bezdek (2010). Classical Topics in Discrete Geometry. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4419-0600-7.
  129. Franco P. Preparata; Michael I. Shamos (2012). Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4612-1098-6.
  130. Xianfeng David Gu; Shing-Tung Yau (2008). Computational Conformal Geometry. International Press. ISBN 978-1-57146-171-1.
  131. 131.0 131.1 Clara Löh (2017). Geometric Group Theory: An Introduction. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-72254-2.
  132. John Morgan; Gang Tian (2014). The Geometrization Conjecture. American Mathematical Soc. ISBN 978-0-8218-5201-9.
  133. Daniel T. Wise (2012). From Riches to Raags: 3-Manifolds, Right-Angled Artin Groups, and Cubical Geometry: 3-manifolds, Right-angled Artin Groups, and Cubical Geometry. American Mathematical Soc. ISBN 978-0-8218-8800-1.
  134. 134.0 134.1 Gerard Meurant (2014). Handbook of Convex Geometry. Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-08-093439-6.
  135. Jürgen Richter-Gebert (2011). Perspectives on Projective Geometry: A Guided Tour Through Real and Complex Geometry. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-642-17286-1.
  136. Kimberly Elam (2001). Geometry of Design: Studies in Proportion and Composition. Princeton Architectural Press. ISBN 978-1-56898-249-6.
  137. Brad J. Guigar (2004). The Everything Cartooning Book: Create Unique And Inspired Cartoons For Fun And Profit. Adams Media. pp. 82–. ISBN 978-1-4405-2305-2.
  138. Mario Livio (2008). The Golden Ratio: The Story of PHI, the World's Most Astonishing Number. Crown/Archetype. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-307-48552-6.
  139. Michele Emmer; Doris Schattschneider (2007). M. C. Escher's Legacy: A Centennial Celebration. Springer. p. 107. ISBN 978-3-540-28849-7.
  140. Robert Capitolo; Ken Schwab (2004). Drawing Course 101. Sterling Publishing Company, Inc. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-4027-0383-6.
  141. Phyllis Gelineau (2011). Integrating the Arts Across the Elementary School Curriculum. Cengage Learning. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-111-30126-2.
  142. Cristiano Ceccato; Lars Hesselgren; Mark Pauly; Helmut Pottmann, Johannes Wallner (2016). Advances in Architectural Geometry 2010. Birkhäuser. p. 6. ISBN 978-3-99043-371-3.
  143. Helmut Pottmann (2007). Architectural geometry. Bentley Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-934493-04-5.
  144. Marian Moffett; Michael W. Fazio; Lawrence Wodehouse (2003). A World History of Architecture. Laurence King Publishing. p. 371. ISBN 978-1-85669-371-4.
  145. Robin M. Green; Robin Michael Green (1985). Spherical Astronomy. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-521-31779-5.
  146. Dmitriĭ Vladimirovich Alekseevskiĭ (2008). Recent Developments in Pseudo-Riemannian Geometry. European Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-3-03719-051-7.
  147. Shing-Tung Yau; Steve Nadis (2010). The Shape of Inner Space: String Theory and the Geometry of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02266-3.
  148. Bengtsson, Ingemar; Życzkowski, Karol (2017). Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02625-4. OCLC 1004572791.
  149. Harley Flanders; Justin J. Price (2014). Calculus with Analytic Geometry. Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-1-4832-6240-6.
  150. Jon Rogawski; Colin Adams (2015). Calculus. W. H. Freeman. ISBN 978-1-4641-7499-5.
  151. Álvaro Lozano-Robledo (2019). Number Theory and Geometry: An Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry. American Mathematical Soc. ISBN 978-1-4704-5016-8.
  152. Arturo Sangalli (2009). Pythagoras' Revenge: A Mathematical Mystery. Princeton University Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-691-04955-7.
  153. Gary Cornell; Joseph H. Silverman; Glenn Stevens (2013). Modular Forms and Fermat's Last Theorem. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4612-1974-3.


Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

"Geometry" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 11 (11th ed.). 1911. pp. 675–736.

Template:Geometry-footer Template:Areas of mathematics

Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We kindly request your support in maintaining the independence of Bharatpedia. As a non-profit organization, we rely heavily on small donations to sustain our operations and provide free access to reliable information to the world. We would greatly appreciate it if you could take a moment to consider donating to our cause, as it would greatly aid us in our mission. Your contribution would demonstrate the importance of reliable and trustworthy knowledge to you and the world. Thank you.

Please select an option below or scan the QR code to donate
₹150 ₹500 ₹1,000 ₹2,000 ₹5,000 ₹10,000 Other