Bharatpedia:Requests for deletion
![]() | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
![]() | See Bharatpedia:Deletion process for the current process Bharatpedia follows. |
- Centralised deletion reform discussion at Bharatpedia:Deletion reform
If you need a page deleted, add the Category:Delete tag to it, and present your reasons for wanting it removed on the article's discussion page. (See Bharatpedia:DPL deletion for a proposed implementation of this.)
This policy is intended to replace Bharatpedia:Votes for deletion.
- SPECIAL REQUEST: The term "Requests for deletion" is used by Wiktionary for its deletion process; it was chosen to avoid any confusion with Bharatpedia's process. If you are going to give a new name to the procedure please choose something else. Eclecticology 01:00:10, 2005-08-02 (UTC) (Speaking as Bharatpedia Admin)
[[::Nomination for Deletion? (WP:NFD)? (not that I like the idea, but it's a better name, with no similar Bharatpedia acronyms I can think of) User:Nominator (t /c) 15:22, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
- Articles for Deletion (WP:AFD), so as to parallel TFD, RFD, and CFD. ~~ User:Your Name (t/c) 19:44, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Notes[edit]
- Clarification: I don't necessarily agree with the above suggestion. I do think VFD is so broken it should just be taken out and shot. What to replace it with (there is a need for a deletion mechanism; I've done Special:Newpages patrol, and you don't know horror till you've done newpages patrol on a Sunday evening US time, when it runs 30-50% shoot on sight) is another question, one to be debated - Dhaneesh Ram 21:13, 1 August 2005 (UTC)