User talk:Bharatwiki Socrates

Thank you

Many thanks for your encouragement. I am sorry for responding rather late. I was a bit unwell and therefore away Bharatpedia for some time. - Kamal Guha (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2024 (IST)

Hi Kamal, No need to apologize! I hope you feel better soon. Health of the well-being is the top priority. Thanks for all your efforts on Bharatpedia –I appreciate it. Take care and looking forward to your return! 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 15:21, 13 January 2024 (IST)

Request for review: Draft:Sanjay Ghare

Hi,

Hope you're doing well. I have a draft biography at Draft:Sanjay Ghare that has been in the AfC queue for over three weeks. It was initially reviewed and declined on 16 July 2026 for insufficient independent sourcing, which I addressed in a full rewrite on 17 July. It has been pending re-review since.

When you have some time, would you be able to take a look? I've tried to address the notability concerns with independent editorial coverage.

Current sourcing:

• YourStory (2020 profile of the company and founder)
• PhocusWire (acquisition coverage, August 2023)
• Startup Pedia (biographical profile)
• Get Latka (business coverage)
• World Travel Tech Awards (industry recognition)
• Forbes editorial column (2025)

The subject is the co-founder and CEO of Vervotech, a Pune-based travel technology company acquired by Constellation Software in 2023.

I understand reviewers are volunteers and appreciate the time you take on this. Happy to make any further improvements if the sourcing still falls short.

Thanks, ~~~~ Prashant1 (talk) 14:41, 13 August 2026 (IST)

Your draft needs more reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the person. Please provide three additional sources with significant coverage, and I will review your draft. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 22:29, 11 October 2026 (IST)

I have reviewed some of your sources. A few appear to be non-existent, while others are misquoted or fail to provide significant coverage of the person.

The foundation of your article is therefore weak. You need to focus on replacing these unreliable or irrelevant sources with reliable ones that provide substantial coverage of the subject. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 22:34, 11 October 2026 (IST)

Thank You for Rollback rights

I agree with the proposed three-month trial period. Thank you for considering the request and offering this opportunity. I will make sure to use the rollback tool responsibly, primarily for clear vandalism, and avoid using it in content disputes or edit wars. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 22:32, 27 September 2026 (IST)

@Editorial Oversight, most welcome! If you ever find yourself unsure about anything, feel free to reach out to me or any other active admin. You have been doing great constructive work, and I'm really impressed with your contributions. I hope you stick around and join us in building this new encyclopedia! 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 22:46, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Thank you for your kind words and encouragement. I appreciate your support and will continue contributing constructively to Bharatpedia. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 22:54, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Please check

Hello, Bharatwiki Socrates. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ajay Kumar (talk) 15:08, 13 October 2026 (IST)

Speedy deletion backlog

Hello Bharatwiki Socrates: There is currently a speedy deletion backlog of 5 pages in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

Administrators are requested to review and process the candidates when time permits.

Thank you for your help keeping the project tidy. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2026 (IST)

Thanks @WikiDwarf for this headup. I have cleared all the csd backlog:

• Deleted 156 csd nominated pages (spam, self-promotional bios, nonsense, hoax content)
• Kept 8 pages in namespace as stub after removing CSD tags and improving content (Anna Dravidar Kazhagam, Parasadi Estate, Oxygen Concentrator, Ladia, List of Hindi films of 1913/1914)
• Completed 2 csd nominated incomplete articles and moved to namespace: (Arun Bhimrao Harolikar and Wounded in action)
• Your sub-pages (common.js, sandbox) were left untouched

Regards. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 10:58, 17 October 2026 (IST)

May i know if there are more articles which are kept of completed? I don't get notifications for them but only for deletion

why are sub-pages not deleted when it was requested by user? Dokania😎(📩) 14:02, 17 October 2026 (IST)

You have nominated Draft:Arun Bhimrao Harolikar and Draft:Wounded in action for speedy deletion. But I thought instead of speedy deletion, they can be kept as “Wounded in action” is a term used extensively in war-related articles, and Arun Bhimrao Harolikar is notable. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 14:19, 17 October 2026 (IST)

Yes, both are already mentioned by you. I am asking about others which aren't mentioned here. Dokania😎(📩) 15:23, 17 October 2026 (IST)

@Dokania, mention the subpage you're talking about...Did I missed something? 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 15:27, 17 October 2026 (IST)

I am asking if there are others apart from 8 kept pages and 2 completed articles which were moved by you? Dokania😎(📩) 15:30, 17 October 2026 (IST)

Please check my contribution and move log for this. I don't remember the exact details, as there was a huge backlog. I reviewed the drafts as quickly as possible, but the process still took considerable time. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 15:34, 17 October 2026 (IST)

+I'm quite sure there wasn't anything beyond that. I've mentioned everything I can recall. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 15:36, 17 October 2026 (IST)

• This is an automated notice. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, please contact the script operator.

Isha Malviya

Check Again Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 14:27, 31 October 2026 (IST)

@WikiDwarf you also check Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 00:39, 1 November 2026 (IST)

I have checked the page again. Since the earlier decline, the same IPv6 range repeated the infobox image change on 31 October; Editorial Oversight reverted it, and then an IP from a different range undid that revert and restored the change. With the disruption now coming from more than one range, I have semi-protected the page for one week and restored the last clean version. If it resumes after the protection expires, the protection can be extended. Thank you for keeping an eye on the page. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 04:24, 1 November 2026 (IST)

Hello @Bharatwiki Socrates, I would like to bring the recent editing activity of User:Get lost to your attention. The user has returned after a one-month block, and similar disruptive editing has reportedly resumed. The account previously vandalised the Narendra Modi article. I request that an administrator review the user's recent contributions and take appropriate hard action if further vandalism is confirmed. Please investigate this matter and consider suitable administrative measures to prevent further disruption. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 08:00, 4 November 2026 (IST)

Blocked as BP:NOTHERE. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 08:19, 4 November 2026 (IST)

I would like to bring @Dokania recent behaviour and editing activities to the attention of the administrators. There appear to be repeated disagreements over Bharatpedia's editing processes and guidelines. For example, please review the discussions at User:BharatwikiArchiveBot/Requests, where the user has disputed the process and reverted edits without adequately addressing the concerns raised. The user also appears to be tagging articles about potentially notable subjects as non-notable without sufficient consideration. In addition, there have been instances of drafts being nominated for speedy deletion without clear justification. The user seems to believe that because I am not an administrator, I cannot determine whether an edit or action is inappropriate. However, following Bharatpedia's guidelines and raising concerns about improper actions should be everyone's responsibility, regardless of user rights. I request that an administrator review these activities and remind the user to read and follow Bharatpedias policies and guidelines before reverting edits, applying deletion tags or taking administrative-style actions. I have tried to address these concerns directly, but the issue remains unresolved. I hope the administrators can intervene before this behaviour causes further disruption and makes Bharatpedia's editing environment difficult for other contributors. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 08:45, 4 November 2026 (IST)

I am taking this to Bharatpedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring where it belongs Dokania😎(📩) 08:59, 4 November 2026 (IST)

You still have a lot of Bharatpedia guidelines to read and editing processes to understand. This was not an edit war; rather, your own behaviour showed a lack of understanding of how the editing process works. For now, I suggest that you focus on creating articles and avoid getting involved in administrative or editorial disputes until you have a proper understanding of Bharatpedia's policies, guidelines and editing procedures. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 09:10, 4 November 2026 (IST)

Also, @Dokania, this user moved the deleted article Abhijit Ashok Paul back to the main namespace after it had already been deleted. Please review this action and take appropriate steps. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 09:16, 4 November 2026 (IST)

Deleted the page as per earlier consensus at Bharatpedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijit Ashok Paul. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 09:19, 4 November 2026 (IST)

We need a closure template for AfD discussions on Bharatpedia. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 09:25, 4 November 2026 (IST)

Done. The closure templates for AfD discussions are ready. To close a discussion place {{subst:Afd top|Result:______. ~~~~}} at the very top of the discussion page and {{subst:Afd bottom}} at the very bottom; the discussion text in between stays untouched. The pair already existed from an old import, but it had no documentation and only the "Afd" spelling worked. The result line of Template:Afd top has been standardised, both templates now carry full documentation (usage, standard results, and the steps after closing, including removing the discussion from its deletion sorting list), and Template:AfD top and Template:AfD bottom redirects have been created so both spellings work. A matching pair for closing reports on the edit warring noticeboard, Template:Edit warring top and Template:Edit warring bottom, has been created as well. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 12:13, 4 November 2026 (IST)

@Editorial Oversight, You should issue the appropriate Level 1 warning for an initial violation. If the user repeats the violation within the same month, escalate the warnings progressively to Level 2, Level 3 and finally Level 4. Level 4 should serve as the final warning. Any further violation after a Level 4 warning make the user eligible for an immediate block.

The warning level should reset at the beginning of the following month. However, previous warnings and blocks should remain in the user's contribution history so administrators can identify patterns of repeated misconduct. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 08:59, 4 November 2026 (IST)

This user had already received multiple warnings, including a final warning, but did not respond or acknowledge them and continued repeating the same behaviour. This suggests a serious disregard for Bharatpedia's policies. I agree that the user is NOTHERE, and an indefinite block may be appropriate to prevent further disruption. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 09:08, 4 November 2026 (IST)

Appreciation for Your Guidance

Perhaps I went a little too far with my words, and I apologise for that. However, my intention was never to create a personal dispute. I was only trying to protect Bharatpedia from unnecessary conflicts and help bring the workflow back on track. I appreciate your decision and the way you explained everything. Your points were fair and helpful. I will take this lesson with me and remember it for the rest of my time on Bharatpedia. Editorial Oversight^{(Talk with me)} 11:39, 4 November 2026 (IST)

About BP:AN/EW

1. I don't find your assessment of the case fair. It was more of a diplomatic balancing rather than a fair judgement. user:Editorial Oversight hadn't even been asked to apologise to me for those remarks. Though I find that he apologized to you.
2. If G2 is removed repeatedly what am I supposed to do? I still want that G2 request to be processed properly.
3. If he keeps removing warnings from his talk page, Isn't it removal of evidence. How would anyone else know that he has been already warned?
4. What was his qualification or need to remove requests from the bot? The bot only processed 4 out of 13 references. That's why I entered it again. I still want the bot to process it again and skip it if it can't process more refs but reverting is just disruptive editing.

Dokania😎(📩) 12:08, 4 November 2026 (IST)