Starting discussion about draft submission |
→Review discussion: Reply |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
hello thanks ! please check out article again I have recreated the article using sources, guide me wherever needed [[User:Shah Syed Muhammad Ali|Shah Syed Muhammad Ali]] ([[User talk:Shah Syed Muhammad Ali|talk]]) 23:16, 3 October 2026 (IST) | hello thanks ! please check out article again I have recreated the article using sources, guide me wherever needed [[User:Shah Syed Muhammad Ali|Shah Syed Muhammad Ali]] ([[User talk:Shah Syed Muhammad Ali|talk]]) 23:16, 3 October 2026 (IST) | ||
:Hello, thanks for the update. I have checked the article again. While there is some independent coverage in sources such as The Times of India and Inquilab, the current sources do not yet appear to establish sufficient significant coverage to demonstrate notability. [[Bharatpedia:Notability|General notability]] guideline requires significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. A number of the other sources are Internet Archive copies of self-published or affiliated material. Archiving such material does not make the underlying source independent for establishing notability. | |||
:The previous decline by @[[User:WikiDwarf|WikiDwarf]] was therefore reasonable based on the sourcing available at that time. I also checked the changes since then, but I don't see enough substantial new independent secondary coverage to resolve the notability concern. If additional substantial coverage from independent publications is available, the article can be reassessed based on those sources. [[User:Editorial Oversight|<span style="color:#996600">Editorial Oversight</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Editorial Oversight|<span style="color:brown">(Talk with me)</span>]]</sup> 23:42, 3 October 2026 (IST) | |||
Revision as of 23:42, 3 October 2026
Review discussion
hello thanks ! please check out article again I have recreated the article using sources, guide me wherever needed Shah Syed Muhammad Ali (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2026 (IST)
- Hello, thanks for the update. I have checked the article again. While there is some independent coverage in sources such as The Times of India and Inquilab, the current sources do not yet appear to establish sufficient significant coverage to demonstrate notability. General notability guideline requires significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. A number of the other sources are Internet Archive copies of self-published or affiliated material. Archiving such material does not make the underlying source independent for establishing notability.
- The previous decline by @WikiDwarf was therefore reasonable based on the sourcing available at that time. I also checked the changes since then, but I don't see enough substantial new independent secondary coverage to resolve the notability concern. If additional substantial coverage from independent publications is available, the article can be reassessed based on those sources. Editorial Oversight(Talk with me) 23:42, 3 October 2026 (IST)