Gramanya

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia
Revision as of 14:19, 7 March 2021 by >JJMC89 bot III (Moving Category:Indian caste system to Category:Caste system in India per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Information red.svg
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Dear reader, We need your support to keep the flame of knowledge burning bright! Our hosting server bill is due on June 1st, and without your help, Bharatpedia faces the risk of shutdown. We've come a long way together in exploring and celebrating our rich heritage. Now, let's unite to ensure Bharatpedia continues to be a beacon of knowledge for generations to come. Every contribution, big or small, makes a difference. Together, let's preserve and share the essence of Bharat.

Thank you for being part of the Bharatpedia family!
Please scan the QR code on the right click here to donate.

0%

   

transparency: ₹0 raised out of ₹100,000 (0 supporter)


Gramanya (Devanagari:ग्रामण्य,Grāmaṇya) refers to a dispute or discussion related to castes in Maharashtra in the past few centuries that related to supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior.

Overview[edit]

Gramanya is a crystallisation of conflicts between two castes of individuals belonging to the same caste, and the same group, about observance of certain religious practices vis-a-vis, other members of the society or of the particular caste group. There are two types of Gramanyas inter-caste, and intra-caste. Records mention that Gramanyas took place in Maharashtra in late 18th and 19th century and various castes were involved in many disputes. There are also recorded instances of Gramanyas between Saraswats and the Chitpawans, Karhades and the Chitpawans, CKPs and the Chitpawans, Pathare Prabhus and the Chitpawans and the Shukla Yujurvedi Deshastha Brahmins and the Chitpawans. The intra-caste disputes involved the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior. The disputes between Daivadnya Brahmins and Chitpawans as well as the Deshasthas happened during 19th century. The disputes between the Marathas and Maharashtrian Brahmins like Deshasthas and Chitpawans happened in and 19th and 20th centuries. Many Brahmins who were following the priesthood, considered the Marathas as Shudra and denied to perform Vedic rituals for them. All such disputes between castes were become common in Maharashtra at that time. Verdicts of Gramanyas were given by arbitrators(religious councils or religious leaders) that decided the ritual status of the caste.[1][2][3][4]

Citations[edit]

  1. Gokhale, Sandhya (2008). The Chitpwans. Shubhi Publications. p. 204. The jati disputes were not a rare occurrence in Maharashtra. There are recorded instances of disputes between jatis such as Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Pathare Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Saraswats and the Chitpawans and Shukla Yajurvedi and the Chitpawans. These intra-caste dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior was called Gramanya in Marathi.
  2. Israel, Milton; Narendra K. Wagle (1987), Religion and society in Maharashtra, p. 145-171
  3. Israel, Milton; Narendra K. Wagle (1987), Religion and society in Maharashtra, p. 148
  4. V. Gupchup, Vijaya (1983), Bombay: social change, 1813–1857, p. 172

Further reading[edit]

  • Thākare, Keśava Sitārāma (1919) (in Marāṭhī), Grāmaṇyācā sādyanta itihāsa arthāta nokarśāhīce banḍa, Mumbai