.svg)
Bots, trusted
7,437
edits
Template:UAA: Difference between revisions
m
→top: clean up, replaced: Wikipedia: → Bharatpedia: (4)
m (1 revision imported) |
WikiDwarfBOT (talk | contribs) m (→top: clean up, replaced: Wikipedia: → Bharatpedia: (4)) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|s |st |stale = [[File:Time2wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Stale:''' This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. | |s |st |stale = [[File:Time2wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Stale:''' This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. | ||
|rn |real |name = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a violation of the username policy'''. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the [[ | |rn |real |name = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a violation of the username policy'''. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the [[Bharatpedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard|conflict of interest noticeboard]]. | ||
|nv |novio|name = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a violation of the username policy'''. | |nv |novio|name = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a violation of the username policy'''. | ||
|sn |stage |name = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a violation of the username policy'''. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the [[ | |sn |stage |name = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a violation of the username policy'''. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the [[Bharatpedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard|conflict of interest noticeboard]]. | ||
|b |bl |no |not |blatant = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy'''. | |b |bl |no |not |blatant = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy'''. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|e |eye = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy''', but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. | |e |eye = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy''', but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. | ||
|ci |coi |coin = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy'''. Consider filing a report at the [[ | |ci |coi |coin = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy'''. Consider filing a report at the [[Bharatpedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard|conflict of interest noticeboard]]. | ||
|r |rfcn = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy'''. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at [[ | |r |rfcn = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy'''. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at [[Bharatpedia:Requests for comment/User names|RFCN]] if they disagree with your concerns. | ||
|np |nop |notp |nopromo |notpromo |nospam |notspam = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy.''' For a username to be blatantly promotional, there must be a link between the username and the user's edits. Consider re-reporting if a connection becomes clear through the user's edits. | |np |nop |notp |nopromo |notpromo |nospam |notspam = [[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not a blatant violation of the username policy.''' For a username to be blatantly promotional, there must be a link between the username and the user's edits. Consider re-reporting if a connection becomes clear through the user's edits. | ||