Bharatpedia

Indian Penal Code: Difference between revisions

Article Talk

Indian Penal Code (edit)

Revision as of 19:04, 11 October 2020

27,624 bytes added ,  11 October 2020
Created page with "{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2016}} {{Use Indian English|date=June 2016}} {{Infobox legislation | short_title = The Indian Penal Code, 1860 | legislature = | image = Star-of-Ind..."
(I have added the some event after drafting of code)
 
(Created page with "{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2016}} {{Use Indian English|date=June 2016}} {{Infobox legislation | short_title = The Indian Penal Code, 1860 | legislature = | image = Star-of-Ind...")
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Indian Penal Code''' (IPC) is the main criminal code of modern [[India]]. It is a code meant to cover all aspects of criminal law. The code was drafted on 6th October 1860. on the recommendation of first law commission  of india established in 1834 under the charter Act of 1833 under the chairmanship of Thomas Babington Macaulay.It came into force in [[British India]] during the early British Raj period in 1862. However, it did not apply automatically in the [[Princely state]]s. They had their own courts and legal systems until the 1940s. The Code has been amended several times and is now supplemented by other criminal provisions.
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2016}}
{{Use Indian English|date=June 2016}}
{{Infobox legislation
| short_title = The Indian Penal Code, 1860
| legislature =
| image = Star-of-India-gold-centre.svg
| imagesize = 200
| imagelink =


After the [[Partition of India|Partition]] of the British Indian Empire, the Indian Penal Code was inherited by its successor states, the [[Dominion of India]] and the [[Dominion of Pakistan]] (where it continues as the [[Pakistan Penal Code]]). The Ranbir Penal Code (RPC) for Indian state of [[Jammu and Kashmir]] is also based on this code. After the separation of [[Bangladesh]] from Pakistan, the code continued in force there. The code was also adopted by the British colonial authorities in colonial [[Burma]], [[Ceylon]] (modern Sri Lanka), the Straits Settlements (now part of [[Malaysia]]), [[Singapore]] and [[Brunei]]. It is the basis of the criminal codes in those countries.
| imagealt =
| caption =
| long_title = An Act to provide a general penal code for India
| citation = [https://archive.org/details/indianpenalcode00macpgoog Act No. 45 of 1860]
| territorial_extent = {{flag|India}}
| enacted_by = [[Imperial Legislative Council]]
| date_enacted = 6 October 1860
| date_assented = 6 October 1860
| date_commenced = 1 January 1862
| bill =
| bill_citation =
| bill_date =
| introduced_by =
| 1st_reading =
| 2nd_reading =
| 3rd_reading =
| white_paper =
| committee_report = [[Law Commission of India|First Law Commission]]
| amendments = ''see'' [[Indian Penal Code#Amendments|Amendments]]
| repeals =
| related_legislation = [[Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973]]
| summary =
| keywords =
| status = amended
}}


[[Category:India]]
The '''Indian Penal Code''' ('''IPC''') is the official [[criminal code]] of [[India]]. It is a comprehensive code intended to cover all substantive aspects of [[criminal law]]. The code was drafted on the recommendations of first law commission of India established in 1834 under the [[Charter Act of 1833]] under the Chairmanship of [[Lord]] [[Thomas Babington Macaulay]].<ref name="judicial book">{{cite book|title=Universal's Guide to Judicial Service Examination|publisher=Universal Law Publishing|isbn=978-93-5035-029-4|page=2|url=https://books.google.com/?id=D0xQqCxpXhQC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref><ref name="Book-heritage">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=mzozRa9wJ9kC&pg=PA75&lpg=PA75&dq=ranbir+penal+code+maharaja+ranbir+singh#v=onepage&q=ranbir%20penal%20code%20maharaja%20ranbir%20singh&f=false|title=The Literary Heritage of Kashmir|publisher=Mittal Publications|location=Jammu and Kashmir|page=75|last1=Lal Kalla|first1=Krishan|accessdate=19 September 2014|year=1985}}</ref><ref name="Law Comm">{{cite web|title=Law Commission of India - Early Beginnings|url=http://www.lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/main.htm|publisher=[[Law Commission of India]]|accessdate=19 September 2014}}</ref> It came into force in [[British India]] during the early [[British Raj]] period in 1862. However, it did not apply automatically in the [[Princely states]], which had their own courts and [[legal system]]s until the 1940s. The Code has since been amended several times and is now supplemented by other criminal provisions.
[[Category:Law]]
 
After the [[partition of India|partition of the British Indian Empire]], the Indian Penal Code was inherited by its successor states, the [[Dominion of India]] and the [[Dominion of Pakistan]], where it continues independently as the [[Pakistan Penal Code]]. After the separation of [[Bangladesh]] from Pakistan, the code [[The Penal Code, 1860 (Bangladesh)|continued in force there]]. The Code was also adopted by the British colonial authorities in [[Colonial Burma]], [[Ceylon]] (modern Sri Lanka), the [[Straits Settlements]] (now part of Malaysia), [[Singapore in the Straits Settlements|Singapore]] and [[Brunei]], and remains the basis of the criminal codes in those countries.
 
== History ==
The draft of the Indian Penal Code was prepared by the First Law Commission, chaired by [[Thomas Babington Macaulay]] in 1834 and was submitted to Governor-General of India Council in 1835. Based on a simplified codification of the law of England at the time, elements were also derived from the [[Napoleonic Code]] and from [[Edward Livingston]]'s [[Louisiana Civil Code]] of 1825. The first final draft of the Indian Penal Code was submitted to the Governor-General of India in Council in 1837, but the draft was again revised. The drafting was completed in 1850 and the Code was presented to the Legislative Council in 1856, but it did not take its place on the statute book of British India until a generation later, following the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857]]. The draft then underwent a very careful revision at the hands of [[Barnes Peacock]], who later became the first Chief Justice of the [[Calcutta High Court]], and the future [[Puisne Judge|puisne judges]] of the Calcutta High Court, who were members of the Legislative Council, and was passed into law on 6 October 1860. The Code came into operation on 1 January 1862. Macaulay did not survive to see the penal code he wrote come into force, having died near the end of 1859. The code came into force in Jammu and Kashmir on 31 October 2019, by virtue of the [[Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019]], and replaced the state's [[Ranbir Penal Code]].<ref>https://www.firstpost.com/india/jammu-and-kashmir-reorganised-into-uts-of-jk-ladakh-security-under-centres-ambit-state-constitution-ranbir-penal-code-abolished-7579091.html</ref>
 
== Objective ==
The objective of this Act is to provide a general [[Penal law|penal code]] for India. Though not the initial objective, the Act does not repeal the penal laws which were in force at the time of coming into force in India. This was done because the Code does not contain all the offences and it was possible that some offences might have still been left out of the Code, which were not intended to be exempted from penal consequences. Though this Code consolidates the whole of the law on the subject and is exhaustive on the matters in respect of which it declares the law, many more penal statutes governing various offences have been created in addition to the code.
 
== Structure ==
The Indian Penal Code of 1860, sub-divided into 23 chapters, comprises 511 sections. The Code starts with an introduction, provides explanations and exceptions used in it, and covers a wide range of offences. The Outline is presented in the following table:<ref>{{cite book|author1=B.M.Gandhi|title=Indian Panel Code|publisher=EBC|isbn=978-81-7012-892-2|pages=1–832|edition=2013}}</ref>
 
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto;"
|+ INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
 
''(Sections 1 to 511)''
! Chapter !!Sections covered!! Classification of offences
|-
| Chapter I ||Sections 1 to 5|| Introduction
|-
| Chapter II ||Sections 6 to 52 || General Explanations
|-
| Chapter III ||Sections 53 to 75 || Of Punishments
|-
| Chapter IV ||Sections 76 to 106 || General Exceptions
''of the Right of Private Defence'' (Sections 96 to 106)
|-
| Chapter V ||Sections 107 to 120 || Of Abetment
|-
| Chapter VA ||Sections 120A to 120B || Criminal Conspiracy
|-
| Chapter VI ||Sections 121 to 130 || Of Offences against the State
|-
| Chapter VII ||Sections 131 to 140 || Of Offences relating to the Army, Navy and Air Force
|-
| Chapter VIII ||Sections 141 to 160 || Of Offences against the Public Tranquillity
|-
| Chapter IX ||Sections 161 to 171 || Of Offences by or relating to [[Public Servant]]s
|-
| Chapter IXA ||Sections 171A to 171I || Of Offences Relating to Elections
|-
| Chapter X ||Sections 172 to 190 || Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants
|-
| Chapter XI ||Sections 191 to 229 || Of [[False evidence|False Evidence]] and Offences against Public Justice
|-
| Chapter XII ||Sections 230 to 263 || Of Offences relating to coin and Government Stamps
|-
| Chapter XIII ||Sections 264 to 267 || Of Offences relating to Weight and Measures
|-
| Chapter XIV ||Sections 268 to 294 || Of Offences affecting the Public Health, Safety, Convenience, Decency and Morals.
|-
| Chapter XV ||Sections 295 to 298 || Of Offences relating to Religion
|-
| Chapter XVI ||Sections 299 to 377 || Of Offences affecting the Human Body.
* Of Offences Affecting Life including murder, culpable [[homicide]] (Sections 299 to 311)
* Of the Causing of Miscarriage, of Injuries to Unborn Children, of the Exposure of Infants, and of the Concealment of Births (Sections 312 to 318)
* Of Hurt (Sections 319 to 338)
* Of Wrongful Restraint and [[False imprisonment|Wrongful Confinement]] (Sections 339 to 348)
* Of Criminal Force and Assault (Sections 349 to 358)
* Of [[Kidnapping]], [[Kidnapping|Abduction]], Slavery and Forced Labour (Sections 359 to 374)
* Sexual Offences including rape and Sodomy (Sections 375 to 377)
|-
| Chapter XVII ||Sections 378 to 462 || Of Offences Against [[Property]]
 
* Of Theft (Sections 378 to 382)
* Of [[Extortion]] (Sections 383 to 389)
* Of Robbery and Dacoity (Sections 390 to 402)
* Of Criminal Misappropriation of Property (Sections 403 to 404)
* Of Criminal Breach of Trust (Sections 405 to 409)
* Of the Receiving of Stolen Property (Sections 410 to 414)
* Of [[Cheating]] (Section 415 to 420)
* Of Fraudulent Deeds and Disposition of Property (Sections 421 to 424)
* Of Mischief (Sections 425 to 440)
* Of Criminal [[Trespass]] (Sections 441 to 462)
|-
| Chapter XVIII || Section 463 to 489 -E || Offences relating to Documents and Property Marks
* Offences relating to Documents (Section 463 to 477-A)
* Offences relating to Property and Other Marks (Sections 478 to 489)
* Offences relating to Currency Notes and Bank Notes (Sections 489A to 489E)
|-
| Chapter XIX ||Sections 490 to 492 || Of the Criminal Breach of Contracts of Service
|-
| Chapter XX ||Sections 493 to 498 || Of Offences related to marriage
|-
| Chapter XXA ||Sections 498A || Of Cruelty by Husband or Relatives of Husband
|-
| Chapter XXI ||Sections 499 to 502 || Of [[Defamation]]
 
|-
| Chapter XXII ||Sections 503 to 510 || Of Criminal [[intimidation]], Insult and Annoyance
|-
| Chapter XXIII ||Section 511 || Of [[Attempt]]s to Commit Offences
|}
 
A detailed list of all IPC laws which include above is here.<ref>{{ cite web |url=https://indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/4219/1/THE-INDIAN-PENAL-CODE-1860.pdf  | title=India penal code |website=India code - a repository of state and central acts|publisher=Ministry of law and justice| accessdate=23 March 2020}}</ref>
 
==Controversies==
Various sections of the Indian Penal Code are controversial, often garnering calls for their repeal, and for them to be declared unconstitutional.
 
===Unnatural Offences (Sodomy) - Section 377===
''Whoever, voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment of life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.''
 
''Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to  the offence described in this section.''<ref>{{cite book|author1=B.M.Gandhi|title=Indian Penal Code|publisher=EBC|isbn=978-81-7012-892-2|pages=1–796}}</ref>
 
* [[Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code|Section 377]] The Delhi High Court on 2 July 2009 gave a liberal interpretation to this section and laid down that this section can not be used to punish an act of consensual sexual intercourse between two same sex individuals.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/Delhi-High-Court-strikes-down-Section-377-of-IPC/article16546323.ece|title=Delhi High Court strikes down Section 377 of IPC|date=2009-07-03|work=The Hindu|access-date=2018-09-24|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
* On 11 December 2013, Supreme Court of India over-ruled the judgment given by Delhi High court in 2009 and clarified that "Section 377, which holds same-sex relations unnatural, does not suffer from unconstitutionality".  The Bench said: "We hold that Section 377 does not suffer from&nbsp;... unconstitutionality and the declaration made by the Division Bench of the High Court is legally unsustainable." It, however, said: "Notwithstanding this verdict, the competent legislature shall be free to consider the desirability and propriety of deleting Section 377 from the statute book or amend it as per the suggestion made by Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-sets-aside-delhi-hc-verdict-decriminalising-gay-sex/article5446939.ece|title=Supreme Court sets aside Delhi HC verdict decriminalising gay sex|last=Venkatesan|first=J.|date=2013-12-11|work=The Hindu|access-date=2018-09-24|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
* On 8 January 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to reconsider its 2013 decision and after much deliberation agreed to decriminalise the parts of Section 377 that criminalised same sex relations on 6 September 2018.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc-decriminalises-section-377-a-timeline-of-the-case/articleshow/65706514.cms |title = SC decriminalises Section 377: A timeline of the case |date = 6 September 2018|accessdate = 7 September 2018| website = Times of India|publisher = }}</ref> The judgement of Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation is overruled.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lawji.in/2018/09/supreme-court-decision-section-377.html|title=Supreme Court's decision on Section 377: Separate decision of 5 Judges [Read Judgement]|website=www.lawji.in|access-date=2018-09-09}}</ref>
 
===Attempt to Commit Suicide - Section 309===
The [[Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code]] deals with unsuccessful suicides, whereby attempting to commit suicide was punishable with imprisonment up to one year. Considering long-standing demand and recommendations of the [[Law Commission of India]], which has repeatedly endorsed the repeal of this section, the [[Government of India]] in December 2014 decided to decriminalise attempts to commit suicide by dropping Section 309 of the IPC from the statute book. Though this decision found favour with most of the states, a few decriminalizes-attempt-to-commit-suicide-removes-section-309/articleshow/45452253.cms|accessdate=15 August 2015|work=The Times of India|date=10 December 2014}}</ref> In February 2015, the Legislative Department of the [[Ministry of Law and Justice (India)|Ministry of Law and Justice]] was asked by the Government to prepare a draft Amendment Bill in this regard.<ref>{{cite web|title=Attempt to Suicide|url=http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=115721|website=Press Information Bureau|publisher=Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India|accessdate=15 August 2015}}</ref>
 
In an August 2015 ruling, the [[Rajasthan High Court]] made the [[Jain]] practice of undertaking voluntary death by fasting at the end of a person's life, known as [[Sallekhana|Santhara]], punishable under sections 306 and 309 of the IPC. This led to some controversy, with some sections of the Jain community urging the Prime Minister to move the [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]] against the order.<ref>{{cite news|title=Rajasthan HC says Santhara illegal, Jain saints want PM Modi to move SC|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/high-court-says-santhara-illegal-jain-saints-want-pm-narendra-modi-to-move-supreme-court/|accessdate=15 August 2015|work=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Rajasthan HC bans starvation ritual 'Santhara', says fasting unto death not essential tenet of Jainism|url=http://www.ibnlive.com/news/india/rajasthan-hc-bans-starvation-ritual-santhara-says-fasting-unto-death-not-essential-tenet-of-jainism-1035893.html|accessdate=15 August 2015|work=IBN Live|agency=CNN-IBN|date=10 August 2015}}</ref> On 31 August 2015, the Supreme Court admitted the petition by Akhil Bharat Varshiya Digambar Jain Parishad and granted leave. It stayed the decision of the High Court and lifted the ban on the practice.
 
In 2017 the new [[Mental Healthcare Act, 2017|Mental Healthcare Act]] of India was signed. It effectively decriminalised suicide, saying "any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be presumed .. to have severe stress and shall not be tried and punished under the said Code."
 
===Adultery - Section 497===
The [[Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code]] has been criticised on the one hand for allegedly treating woman as the private property of her husband, and on the other hand for giving women complete protection against punishment for adultery.<ref>{{cite news|title=Wife is private property, so no trespassing|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wife-is-private-property-so-no-trespassing/articleshow/48106882.cms|accessdate=15 August 2015|work=The Times of india|date=17 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Adultery law biased against men, says Supreme Court|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Adultery-law-biased-against-men-says-Supreme-Court/articleshow/10964790.cms|accessdate=15 August 2015|work=The Times of India|date=3 December 2011}}</ref> This section was unanimously struck down on 27 September 2018 by a five judge bench of the Supreme Court in case of [https://web.archive.org/web/20190715194520/https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2017/32550/32550_2017_Judgement_27-Sep-2018.pdf Joseph Shine v. Union of India] as being unconstitutional and demeaning to the dignity of women. Adultery continues to be a ground for seeking divorce in a Civil Court, but is no longer a criminal offence in India.
 
In 2020 alone two review petitions were submitted at the Supreme Court challenging the decriminalization of Adultery.<ref>{{Cite web|last=NETWORK|first=LIVELAW NEWS|date=2020-06-25|title=SC Dismisses Review Petitions Against Judgment Decriminalizing Adultery [Read Order]|url=https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/review-petition-adultery-dismissed-158899|access-date=2020-06-29|website=www.livelaw.in|language=en}}</ref> However both of them couldn't stand as there was no substantial ground for appeal.
 
===Death penalty ===
Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 121 (war against the Government of India), 132 (mutiny), 194 (false evidence to procure conviction for a capital offence), 302, 303 (murder), 305 (abetting suicide), 364A (kidnapping for ransom), 396 (banditry with murder), 376A (rape) have death penalty as punishment. There is ongoing debate for abolishing capital punishment.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2015/09/03/the-reasons-indias-law-commission-says-the-death-penalty-should-be-scrapped/|title=The Reasons India's Law Commission Says the Death Penalty Should Be Scrapped|first=Corinne|last=Abrams|date=3 September 2015|publisher=}}</ref>
 
==Criminal justice reforms==
In 2003, the Malimath Committee submitted its report recommending several far-reaching penal reforms including separation of investigation and prosecution (similar to the [[Crown Prosecution Service|CPS]] in the UK) to streamline [[criminal justice]] system.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ipc498a.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/india_crim_justice_reform.pdf |title=IPC Reform Committee recommends separation of investigation from prosecution powers (pdf) |date= |accessdate=2012-05-23}}</ref> The essence of the report was a perceived need for shift from an adversarial to an inquisitorial criminal justice system, based on the [[Continental Europe]]an systems.
 
== Amendments ==
The Code has been amended several times.<ref name=IPC>{{cite web|author1=Parliament of India|title=The Indian Penal Code|url=https://www.childlineindia.org.in/CP-CR-Downloads/Indian%20penal%20code%201860.pdf|website=childlineindia.org.in|accessdate=7 June 2015}} {{PD-notice}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Indian Penal Code, 1860|date=7 May 2015|publisher=Current Publications|url=https://books.google.com/?id=DYj9CAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false|accessdate=8 June 2015}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
!S. No.
!Short title of amending legislation
!No.
!Year
|-
|1
|The Repealing Act, 1870
|14
|1870
|-
|2
|The Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1870
|27
|1870
|-
|3
|The Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1872
|19
|1872
|-
|4
|The Indian Oaths Act, 1873
|10
|1873
|-
|5
|The Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1882
|8
|1882
|-
|6
|The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1882
|10
|1882
|-
|7
|The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1886
|10
|1886
|-
|8
|The Indian Marine Act, 1887
|14
|1887
|-
|9
|The Metal Tokens Act, 1889
|1
|1889
|-
|10
|The Indian Merchandise Marks Act, 1889
|4
|1889
|-
|11
|The Cantonments Act, 1889
|13
|1889
|-
|12
|The Indian Railways Act, 1890
|9
|1890
|-
|13
|The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1891
|10
|1891
|-
|14
|The Amending Act, 1891
|12
|1891
|-
|15
|The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1894
|3
|1894
|-
|16
|The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1895
|3
|1895
|-
|17
|The Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1896
|6
|1896
|-
|18
|The Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1898
|4
|1898
|-
|19
|The Currency-Notes Forgery Act, 1899
|12
|1899
|-
|20
|The Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1910
|3
|1910
|-
|21
|The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1913
|8
|1913
|-
|22
|The Indian Elections Offences and Inquiries Act, 1920
|39
|1920
|-
|23
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1921
|16
|1921
|-
|24
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1923
|20
|1923
|-
|25
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1924
|5
|1924
|-
|26
|The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1924
|18
|1924
|-
|27
|The Workmen's Breach of Contract (Repealing) Act, 1925
|3
|1925
|-
|29
|The Obscene Publications Act, 1925
|8
|1925
|-
|29
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1925
|29
|1925
|-
|30
|The Repealing and Amending Act, 1927
|10
|1927
|-
|31
|The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1927
|25
|1927
|-
|32
|The Repealing and Amending Act, 1930
|8
|1930
|-
|33
|The Indian Air Force Act, 1932
|14
|1932
|-
|34
|The Amending Act, 1934
|35
|1934
|-
|35
|The Government of India (Adaptation of Indian Laws) Order, 1937
|{{n/a}}
|1937
|-
|36
|The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1939
|22
|1939
|-
|37
|The Offences on Ships and Aircraft Act, 1940
|4
|1940
|-
|38
|The Indian Merchandise Marks (Amendment)  Act,  1941
|2
|1941
|-
|39
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1942
|8
|1942
|-
|40
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1943
|6
|1943
|-
|41
|The Indian Independence (Adaptation of  Central Acts and Ordinances) Order, 1948
|{{n/a}}
|1948
|-
|42
|The Criminal Law (Removal of Racial Discriminations) Act, 1949
|17
|1949
|-
|43
|The Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1949
|42
|1949
|-
|44
|The Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950
|{{n/a}}
|1950
|-
|45
|The Repealing and Amending Act, 1950
|35
|1950
|-
|46
|The Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951
|3
|1951
|-
|47
|The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952
|46
|1952
|-
|48
|The Repealing and Amending Act, 1952
|48
|1952
|-
|49
|The Repealing and Amending Act, 1953
|42
|1953
|-
|50
|The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1955
|26
|1955
|-
|51
|The Adaptation of Laws (No.2) Order, 1956
|{{n/a}}
|1956
|-
|52
|The Repealing and Amending Act, 1957
|36
|1957
|-
|53
|The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958
|2
|1958
|-
|54
|The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
|43
|1958
|-
|55
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1959
|52
|1959
|-
|56
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1961
|41
|1961
|-
|57
|The Anti-Corruption Laws (Amendment) Act, 1964
|40
|1964
|-
|58
|The Criminal and Election Laws Amendment Act, 1969
|35
|1969
|-
|59
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1969
|36
|1969
|-
|60
|The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1972
|31
|1972
|-
|61
|The Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund (Amendment) Act, 1973
|40
|1973
|-
|62
|The Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1975
|38
|1975
|-
|63
|The Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975
|40
|1975
|-
|64
|The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983
|43
|1983
|-
|65
|The Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983
|46
|1983
|-
|66
|The Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
|43
|1986
|-
|67
|The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 1988
|33
|1988
|-
|68
|The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
|49
|1988
|-
|69
|The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1993
|42
|1993
|-
|70
|The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1995
|24
|1995
|-
|71
|[[The Information Technology Act, 2000]]
|21
|2000
|-
|72
|The Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 2003
|24
|2003
|-
|73
|The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005
|25
|2005
|-
|74
|The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005
|2
|2006
|-
|75
|[[Information Technology Act, 2000|The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008]]
|10
|2009
|-
|76
|[[The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013]]
|13
|2013
|-
|77
|[[The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018]]
|
|2018
|}
 
== Acclaim ==
 
The Code is universally acknowledged as a cogently drafted code, ahead of its time. It has substantially survived for over 150 years in several jurisdictions without major amendments. [[Nicholas Phillips, Baron Phillips of Worth Matravers|Nicholas Phillips]], [[Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom|Justice]] of [[Supreme Court of the United Kingdom|Supreme Court]] of United Kingdom applauded the efficacy and relevance of IPC while commemorating 150 years of IPC.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/odisha/2011/may/04/ipcs-endurance-lauded-250178.html|title=IPC’s endurance lauded|work=The New Indian Express|access-date=2018-09-24}}</ref> Modern crimes involving technology unheard of during Macaulay's time fit easily within the Code{{citation needed|date=December 2010}} mainly because of the broadness of the Code's drafting.
 
== Cultural references ==
Some references to specific sections (called ''dafā/dafa'a'' in Hindi-Urdu, دفعہ or दफ़ा/दफ़आ) of the IPC have entered popular speech in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. For instance, con men are referred to as 420s (''chaar-sau-bees'' in Hindi-Urdu) after [[Section 420]] which covers cheating.<ref name="ref85vexal">{{Citation | title=The return of the Raj: a novel | author=Henry Scholberg | publisher=NorthStar Publications, 1992 | isbn= | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_0BbAAAAMAAJ | quote=''...&nbsp;People were saying, 'Twenty plus Four equals Char Sau Bees.' Char Sou Bees is 420 which is the number of the law that has to do with counterfeiting&nbsp;...''| year=1992 }}</ref> Similarly, specific reference to section 302 ("''tazīrāt-e-Hind dafā tīn-sau-do ke tehet sazā-e-maut''", "''punishment of death under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code''"), which covers the death penalty, have become part of common knowledge in the region due to repeated mentions of it in [[Bollywood]] movies and regional [[pulp literature]].<ref name="ref45robem">{{Citation | title=The Great Indian Laughter Challenge – Jokes Book | author=Star Plus | publisher=Popular Prakashan | isbn=978-81-7991-343-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yiwV7dMOdhwC | quote=''...&nbsp;Tazeerat-e-hind, dafa 302 ke tahat, mujrim ko maut ki saza sunai jaati hai&nbsp;...''}}</ref><ref name="ref84vovim">{{Citation | title=Ji Mantriji: The diaries of Shri Suryaprakash Singh |author1=Alok Tomar |author2=Monisha Shah |author3=Jonathan Lynn | publisher=Penguin Books in association with BBC Worldwide, 2001 | isbn=978-0-14-302767-6 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9FduAAAAMAAJ | quote=''...&nbsp;we'd have the death penalty back tomorrow. Dafa 302, taaziraat-e-Hind&nbsp;... to be hung by the neck until death&nbsp;...''|year=2001 }}</ref> ''Dafa 302'' was also the name of a Bollywood movie released in 1975.<ref name="ref39dofam">{{Citation | title=Great masters of Indian cinema: the Dadasaheb Phalke Award winnersGreat Masters of Indian Cinema Series | author=D. P. Mishra | publisher=Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 2006 | isbn=978-81-230-1361-9 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=whtmAAAAMAAJ | quote=''...&nbsp;Badti Ka Naam Dadhi ( 1975), Chhoti Si Baat ( 1975), Dafa 302 ( 1 975), Chori Mera Kaam ( 1975), Ek Mahal Ho Sapnon Ka (1975)&nbsp;...''| date=2006-09-01 }}</ref> Similarly, ''[[Shree 420]]'' was the name of a 1955 Bollywood movie starring Raj Kapoor.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048613/|title=Shree 420|publisher=|via=www.imdb.com}}</ref> and ''[[Chachi 420]]'' was a Bollywood movie released in 1997 starring [[Kamal Haasan]].<ref>{{Citation|last=Haasan|first=Kamal|title=Chachi 420|date=1997-12-19|url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0233422/|last2=Puri|last3=Puri|last4=Tabu|first2=Amrish|first3=Om|accessdate=2017-04-03}}</ref>
 
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
 
== Further reading ==
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite book |author= C.K.Takwani |title= Indian Penal Code|publisher=Eastern Book Company |year=2014}}
*{{cite book |author= Murlidhar Chaturvedi |title= Bhartiya Dand Sanhita,1860|publisher =EBC |year=2011 |isbn=978-93-5028-140-6}}
*{{cite book |author1=Surender Malik |author2=Sudeep Malik |title= Supreme Court on Penal Code |publisher =EBC |year=2015 |isbn=978-93-5145-218-8}}
{{refend}}
 
== External links ==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20150223171017/http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/welcome.html Constitution of India]
* [http://www.hindisahityadarpan.in/2013/09/download-constitution-of-India-hindi-english-free.html Download Constitution Of India FREE In Hindi & English]
* [http://devgan.in/indian_penal_code/ I.P.C (Mobile Friendly)]
 
[[Category:Indian Penal Code| ]]
[[Category:Acts of the Parliament of India]]
[[Category:Legislation in British India]]
[[Category:Criminal codes]]
[[Category:1860 in British law]]
[[Category:1860 in law]]
[[Category:1860 in India]]
Simba
New page reviewers
3,052

edits

Retrieved from "https://en.bharatpedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/4468"