Nathu La and Cho La clashes: Difference between revisions

Cleanup:
m (Removing protection template from an unprotected page)
(Cleanup:)
 
Line 21: Line 21:
| commander2        = {{flagdeco|China}} [[Mao Zedong]]<br />{{small|(Chairman of the [[Communist Party of China|CPC]]/[[Central Military Commission (China)|CMC]])}}<br />{{flagdeco|China}} [[Maj. Gen.]] Wang Chenghan<br />{{small|(Deputy commander of the [[Tibet Military District]])}}<br />{{flagdeco|China}} [[Maj. Gen.]] Yu Zhiquan
| commander2        = {{flagdeco|China}} [[Mao Zedong]]<br />{{small|(Chairman of the [[Communist Party of China|CPC]]/[[Central Military Commission (China)|CMC]])}}<br />{{flagdeco|China}} [[Maj. Gen.]] Wang Chenghan<br />{{small|(Deputy commander of the [[Tibet Military District]])}}<br />{{flagdeco|China}} [[Maj. Gen.]] Yu Zhiquan
| units1            = {{army|India}}
| units1            = {{army|India}}
| units2            =  
| units2            = {{army|CHN}}
{{army|CHN}}
| strength1        = Part of the 112th Infantry Brigade
| strength1        = Part of the 112th Infantry Brigade
| strength2        = 31st Infantry Regiment
| strength2        = 31st Infantry Regiment
Line 33: Line 32:
*3rd Artillery Regiment
*3rd Artillery Regiment
| casualties1      = '''Indian claims''':<br> 88 killed<br>163 wounded<ref name="People 1967 51">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y2jVAAAAMAAJ |title=Lok Sabha Debates |last1=People |first1=India Parliament House of the |last2=Sabha |first2=India Parliament Lok |date=1967 |publisher=Lok Sabha Secretariat. |pages=51– |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Mishra JNU"/><br/>'''Chinese claims''':<br>101 killed <br>(65 Nathu La, 36 Cho La)<ref name="Fravel" />
| casualties1      = '''Indian claims''':<br> 88 killed<br>163 wounded<ref name="People 1967 51">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y2jVAAAAMAAJ |title=Lok Sabha Debates |last1=People |first1=India Parliament House of the |last2=Sabha |first2=India Parliament Lok |date=1967 |publisher=Lok Sabha Secretariat. |pages=51– |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Mishra JNU"/><br/>'''Chinese claims''':<br>101 killed <br>(65 Nathu La, 36 Cho La)<ref name="Fravel" />
| casualties2      = '''Indian claims''':<br>340 killed<br>450 wounded.<ref name="Mishra JNU"/><br>'''Chinese claims''': <br>32 killed (Nathu La), unknown (Cho La)<ref name="Fravel" />  
| casualties2      = '''Indian claims''':<br>340 killed<br>450 wounded<ref name="Mishra JNU"/><br>'''Chinese claims''': <br>32 killed (Nathu La), unknown (Cho La)<ref name="Fravel" />
| casualties3      =  
| casualties3      =  
| notes            =  
| notes            =  
Line 39: Line 38:
}}
}}


The '''Nathu La and Cho La clashes''', sometimes referred to as the '''Sino-Indian War of 1967''',<ref>{{Cite news|last=Prashar|first=Sakshi|date=June 2020|title=A history of Sino-Indian feuds: Times when China had to back down|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/a-history-of-sino-indian-feuds-times-when-china-had-to-back-down/articleshow/76357150.cms|access-date=2021-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Mitter|first=Rana|date=September 2020|title=The old scars remain: Sino-Indian war of 1967|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/culture/books/review-watershed-1967-indias-forgotten-victory-over-china-by-probal-dasgupta/cid/1790853|access-date=10 February 2021}}</ref> consisted of a series of border clashes between India and China alongside the border of the Himalayan [[Kingdom of Sikkim]], then an Indian [[protectorate]].
The '''Nathu La and Cho La clashes''', sometimes referred to as the '''1967 China–India standoff''', '''Sino-Indian War of 1967''',<ref>{{Cite news|last=Prashar|first=Sakshi|date=June 2020|title=A history of Sino-Indian feuds: Times when China had to back down|work=The Economic Times|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/a-history-of-sino-indian-feuds-times-when-china-had-to-back-down/articleshow/76357150.cms|access-date=2021-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Mitter|first=Rana|date=September 2020|title=The old scars remain: Sino-Indian war of 1967|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/culture/books/review-watershed-1967-indias-forgotten-victory-over-china-by-probal-dasgupta/cid/1790853|access-date=10 February 2021}}</ref> '''Indo-China War of 1967''' or '''Second Sino-Indian War''', consisted of a series of border clashes between [[India]] and [[China]] alongside the border of the Himalayan [[Kingdom of Sikkim]], then an Indian [[protectorate]].


The Nathu La clashes started on 11 September 1967, when China's [[People's Liberation Army]] (PLA) launched an attack on Indian posts at [[Nathu La]], and lasted till 15 September 1967. In October 1967, another military duel took place at [[Cho La (Sikkim and Tibet)|Cho La]] and ended on the same day.
The Nathu La clashes started on 11 September 1967, when China's [[People's Liberation Army]] (PLA) launched an attack on Indian posts at [[Nathu La]], and lasted till 15 September 1967. In October 1967, another military duel took place at [[Cho La (Sikkim and Tibet)|Cho La]] and ended on the same day.
Line 69: Line 68:


== Clashes at Cho La ==
== Clashes at Cho La ==
On 1 October 1967, another clash between India and China took place at [[Cho La, Sikkim|Cho La]], another pass on the Sikkim–Tibet border, a few kilometers north of Nathu La.<ref name="Thapliyal" /><ref name="Fravel" />
On 1 October 1967, another clash between India and China took place at [[Cho La, Sikkim|Cho La]], a border pass a few kilometers north of Nathu La.<ref name="Thapliyal" /><ref name="Fravel" />


Scholar van Eekelen states that the duel was initiated by the Chinese troops after a scuffle between the two, when the Chinese troops infiltrated into the Sikkim-side of the border, claimed the pass and questioned the Indian occupation of it.<ref name="van Eekelen p.239" /><ref name="Bajpai p.193" />
Scholar van Eekelen states that the duel was initiated by the Chinese troops after a scuffle between the two, when the Chinese troops infiltrated into the Sikkim-side of the border, claimed the pass and questioned the Indian occupation of it.<ref name="van Eekelen p.239" /><ref name="Bajpai p.193" />


China, however, asserted that the provocation had come from the Indian side. According to the Chinese version, Indian troops had infiltrated into the Chinese territory across the pass, made provocations against the stationed Chinese troops, and opened fire on them.<ref name="Bajpai p.193">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EB2l6dr_JlwC&pg=PA193 |title=China's Shadow Over Sikkim: The Politics of Intimidation |last=Bajpai |first=G. S. |date=1999 |publisher=Lancer Publishers |isbn=9781897829523 |pages=193, 194 |language=en}}</ref>
China, however, asserted that the provocation had come from the Indian side. According to the Chinese version, Indian troops had infiltrated into the Chinese territory across the pass, made provocations against the troops stationed there, and opened fire on them.<ref name="Bajpai p.193">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EB2l6dr_JlwC&pg=PA193 |title=China's Shadow Over Sikkim: The Politics of Intimidation |last=Bajpai |first=G. S. |date=1999 |publisher=Lancer Publishers |isbn=9781897829523 |pages=193, 194 |language=en}}</ref>


The military duel lasted one day,<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CnDlcP6L8iEC&pg=PA317 |title=Beijing's Power and China's Borders: Twenty Neighbors in Asia |last1=Elleman |first1=Bruce |last2=Kotkin |first2=Stephen |last3=Schofield |first3=Clive |date=2015 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |isbn=9780765627667 |pages=317 |language=en}}</ref> during which the Chinese were driven away, and it boosted Indian morale.<ref name="van Eekelen p.239" /> According to Indian Maj. Gen. Sheru Thapliyal, the Chinese were forced to withdraw nearly three kilometers in Cho La during this clash.<ref name="Thapliyal" />
The military duel lasted one day,<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CnDlcP6L8iEC&pg=PA317 |title=Beijing's Power and China's Borders: Twenty Neighbors in Asia |last1=Elleman |first1=Bruce |last2=Kotkin |first2=Stephen |last3=Schofield |first3=Clive |date=2015 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |isbn=9780765627667 |pages=317 |language=en}}</ref> during which the Chinese were driven away, and it boosted Indian morale.<ref name="van Eekelen p.239" /> According to Indian Maj. Gen. Sheru Thapliyal, the Chinese were forced to withdraw nearly three kilometers in Cho La during the clash.<ref name="Thapliyal" />


== Casualties ==
== Casualties ==
Line 83: Line 82:


== Analysis ==
== Analysis ==
According to scholar [[Taylor Fravel]], the competition to control the disputed land in Chumbi valley had played a key role in escalating tensions in these events. Fravel has argued that these incidents demonstrate the effects of China's "regime insecurity" on the use of force. He states that three factors in these clashes emphasized the role of "declining claim strength in China's decision to initiate the use of force" against India. First is the Indian Army's expansion of size after the 1962 war leading to the strengthening of its borders with China. Second is the apparent Indian aggression in asserting its claims near the border. Third is the Chinese perceptions of Indian actions, for which Fravel says that the most unstable period of [[Cultural Revolution]] in China, which coincided with these incidents, was a possible contributing factor. Fravel remarks that the Chinese leaders possibly magnified the potential threat from India due to the border-tensions and the perceived pressure from India to strengthen its claims across the border, and decided that a severe attack was needed.<ref name="Fravel" />
According to scholar [[Taylor Fravel]], the competition to control the disputed land in Chumbi valley had played a key role in escalating tensions in these events. Fravel has argued that these incidents demonstrate the effects of China's "regime insecurity" on the use of force. He states that three factors in these clashes emphasized the role of "declining claim strength in China's decision to initiate the use of force" against India. The first was the Indian Army's expansion in size after the 1962 war, leading to the strengthening of its borders with China. The second was the apparent Indian aggression in asserting its claims near the border. The third was the Chinese perceptions of Indian actions, for which Fravel says that the most unstable period of [[Cultural Revolution]] in China, which coincided with these incidents, was a possible contributing factor. Fravel remarks that the Chinese leaders possibly magnified the potential threat from India due to the border tensions and the perceived pressure from India to strengthen its claims across the border, and decided that a severe attack was needed.<ref name="Fravel" />


Fravel has stated that the initial Chinese attack was perhaps not authorized by the [[Central Military Commission (China)]]. He also noted that after the attack was launched at Nathu La by the Chinese, the then [[Premier of the People's Republic of China|Chinese Premier]], [[Zhou Enlai]], instructed Chinese forces to return fire only when fired upon.<ref name="Fravel" />
Fravel has stated that the initial Chinese attack was perhaps not authorized by the [[Central Military Commission (China)]]. He also noted that after the attack was launched at Nathu La by the Chinese, the then [[Premier of the People's Republic of China|Chinese Premier]], [[Zhou Enlai]], instructed Chinese forces to return fire only when fired upon.<ref name="Fravel" />


According to scholar John Garver, due to the Nathu La incident, Indian concerns were roused about China's intentions regarding Sikkim. Garver also remarks that India was "quite pleased with the combat performance of its forces in the Nathu La clashes, seeing it as signalling dramatic improvement since 1962 war."<ref name="Garver">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TOVaMckcO0MC&pg=PA171 |title=Protracted Contest: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Twentieth Century |last=Garver |first=John W. |date=2011 |publisher=University of Washington Press |isbn=9780295801209 |pages=171 |language=en}}</ref>
Scholar John Garver states that, due to the Nathu La incident, Indian concerns were roused about China's intentions regarding Sikkim. Garver also remarks that India was "quite pleased with the combat performance of its forces in the Nathu La clashes, seeing it as signalling dramatic improvement since 1962 war."<ref name="Garver">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TOVaMckcO0MC&pg=PA171 |title=Protracted Contest: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Twentieth Century |last=Garver |first=John W. |date=2011 |publisher=University of Washington Press |isbn=9780295801209 |pages=171 |language=en}}</ref>


== Aftermath ==
== Aftermath ==
Line 104: Line 103:
| Brigadier [[Rai Singh Yadav]] || [[The Grenadiers|2nd Grenadiers]] || [[Nathu La]], [[Sikkim]], [[India]]|| <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/rai-singh|title=Lt Col Rai Singh – Maha Vir Chakra|publisher=Gallantry Awards, Ministry of Defence, Govt of India website}}</ref>
| Brigadier [[Rai Singh Yadav]] || [[The Grenadiers|2nd Grenadiers]] || [[Nathu La]], [[Sikkim]], [[India]]|| <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/rai-singh|title=Lt Col Rai Singh – Maha Vir Chakra|publisher=Gallantry Awards, Ministry of Defence, Govt of India website}}</ref>
|-
|-
| Lieutenant Colonel [[Mahatam Singh]] || [[Jammu and Kashmir Rifles|10 JAK Rifles]] || [[Cho La (Sikkim and Tibet)|Cho La]], [[Sikkim]], [[India]]|| <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/mahatam-singh|title=Lt Col Mahatam Singh – Maha Vir Chakra|publisher=Gallantry Awards, Ministry of Defence, Govt of India website}}</ref>
| Lieutenant Colonel [[Mahatam Singh]]|| [[Jammu and Kashmir Rifles|10 JAK Rifles]] || [[Cho La (Sikkim and Tibet)|Cho La]], [[Sikkim]], [[India]]|| <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/mahatam-singh|title=Lt Col Mahatam Singh – Maha Vir Chakra|publisher=Gallantry Awards, Ministry of Defence, Govt of India website}}</ref>
|-
|-
| Major Harbhajan Singh (P) || [[Rajput Regiment|18 Rajput]]|| [[Nathu La]], [[Sikkim]], [[India]]|| <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.honourpoint.in/profile/major-harbhajan-singh-mvc-2/|title=Major Harbhajan Singh MVC|publisher=HonourPoint}}</ref>
| Major Harbhajan Singh (P) || [[Rajput Regiment|18 Rajput]]|| [[Nathu La]], [[Sikkim]], [[India]]|| <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.honourpoint.in/profile/major-harbhajan-singh-mvc-2/|title=Major Harbhajan Singh MVC|publisher=HonourPoint}}</ref>
Line 139: Line 138:


== External links ==
== External links ==
* [http://veekay-militaryhistory.blogspot.com/2013/04/nathula-1967-real-story.html Nathu La; 1967 - The Real Story]; Veekay (Indian Army Corps), using the diary of Second Lieutenant N.C Gupta; ''cited by Willem van Eekelen in his book, Indian Foreign Policy and the Border Dispute with China: A New Look at Asian Relationships (p 238)''. [https://books.google.com/books?id=G3nsCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA238#v=onepage&q&f=false]
* [http://veekay-militaryhistory.blogspot.com/2013/04/nathula-1967-real-story.html Nathu La; 1967 - The Real Story]; Veekay (Indian Army Corps), using the diary of Second Lieutenant N.C Gupta; ''cited by Willem van Eekelen in his book, Indian Foreign Policy and the Border Dispute with China: A New Look at Asian Relationships (p 238)''. [https://books.google.com/books?id=G3nsCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA238]


{{China–India relations}}
{{China–India relations}}
Bots, trusted
7,437

edits