Bots, trusted
7,437
edits
m (robot: Creating/updating articles) |
WikiDwarfBOT (talk | contribs) (Cleanup: Source modification. Information added.) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{for|independence movements of Native American Indians|Native American self-determination}} | {{for|independence movements of Native American Indians|Native American self-determination}} | ||
<!-- about 20 of the references are general, with no indication of what content is or where in them for the content can be found --> | <!-- about 20 of the references are general, with no indication of what content is or where in them for the content can be found --> | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} | ||
{{use Indian English|date=July 2016}} | {{use Indian English|date=July 2016}} | ||
{{Colonial India}} | {{Colonial India}} | ||
{{Revolution sidebar}} | {{Revolution sidebar}} | ||
The '''Indian independence movement''' was a series of historic events with the ultimate aim of ending [[British Raj|British rule in India]]. It lasted from 1857 to 1947. | The '''Indian independence movement''' was a series of historic events with the ultimate aim of ending [[British Raj|British rule in India]] also known as British Raj. It lasted from 1857 to 1947. | ||
The first nationalistic [[revolutionary movement for Indian independence]] emerged from [[Bengal]]. It later took root in the newly formed [[Indian National Congress]] with prominent moderate leaders seeking the right to appear for [[Indian Civil Service (British India)|Indian Civil Service examinations in British India]], as well as more economic rights for natives. The first half of the 20th century saw a more radical approach towards self-rule by the [[Lal Bal Pal|Lal Bal Pal triumvirate]], [[Aurobindo Ghosh]] and [[V. O. Chidambaram Pillai]]. | The first nationalistic [[revolutionary movement for Indian independence]] emerged from [[Bengal]]. It later took root in the newly formed [[Indian National Congress]] with prominent moderate leaders seeking the right to appear for [[Indian Civil Service (British India)|Indian Civil Service examinations in British India]], as well as more economic rights for natives. The first half of the 20th century saw a more radical approach towards self-rule by the [[Lal Bal Pal|Lal Bal Pal triumvirate]], [[Aurobindo Ghosh]] and [[V. O. Chidambaram Pillai]]. | ||
The | The stages of the independence struggle in the 1920s were characterized by the leadership of [[Mahatma Gandhi]] and [[Indian National Congress|Congress]]' adoption of Gandhi's policy of [[non-violence]] and [[Salt March|civil disobedience]]. Some of the leading followers of Gandhi's ideology were [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], [[Vallabhbhai Patel]], [[Abdul Ghaffar Khan]], [[Maulana Azad]], and others. Intellectuals such as [[Rabindranath Tagore]], [[Subramania Bharati]], and [[Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay]] spread patriotic awareness. Female leaders like [[Sarojini Naidu]], [[Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit]], [[Pritilata Waddedar]], and [[Kasturba Gandhi]] promoted the emancipation of Indian women and their participation in the freedom struggle. | ||
Few leaders followed a more violent approach. This became especially popular after the [[Rowlatt Act]], which permitted [[indefinite detention]]. The Act sparked protests across India, especially in the [[Punjab Province (British India)|Punjab province]], where they were violently suppressed in the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]]. | Few leaders followed a more violent approach. This became especially popular after the [[Rowlatt Act]], which permitted [[indefinite detention]]. The Act sparked protests across India, especially in the [[Punjab Province (British India)|Punjab province]], where they were violently suppressed in the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]]. | ||
The Indian independence movement was in constant ideological evolution. Essentially [[Anti-imperialism|anti-colonial]], it was supplemented by visions of independent, economic development with a secular, democratic, republican, and civil-libertarian political structure. After the 1930s, the movement took on a strong socialist orientation. It culminated in the [[Indian Independence Act 1947]], which ended [[British Crown|Crown]] [[suzerainty]] | The Indian independence movement was in constant ideological evolution. Essentially [[Anti-imperialism|anti-colonial]], it was supplemented by visions of independent, economic development with a secular, democratic, republican, and civil-libertarian political structure. After the 1930s, the movement took on a strong socialist orientation. It culminated in the [[Indian Independence Act 1947]], which ended [[British Crown|Crown]] [[suzerainty]] and partitioned British Raj into [[Dominion of India]] and [[Dominion of Pakistan]]. | ||
India remained a [[Dominion|Crown Dominion]] until 26 January 1950, when the [[Constitution of India]] established the Republic of India. Pakistan remained a dominion until 1956 when it adopted its first constitution. In 1971, East Pakistan declared its own independence as [[Bangladesh]].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Remembering the war of 1971 in East Pakistan|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/remembering-war-1971-east-pakistan-191216054546348.html|last=Zakaria|first=Anam|work=Al Jazeera|access-date=2020-05-18}}</ref> | India remained a [[Dominion|Crown Dominion]] until 26 January 1950, when the [[Constitution of India]] established the Republic of India. Pakistan remained a dominion until 1956 when it adopted its first constitution. In 1971, East Pakistan declared its own independence as [[Bangladesh]].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Remembering the war of 1971 in East Pakistan|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/remembering-war-1971-east-pakistan-191216054546348.html|last=Zakaria|first=Anam|work=Al Jazeera|access-date=2020-05-18}}</ref> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
== Early | == Early rebellions == | ||
[[Maveeran Alagumuthu Kone]] was an early rebel against the British presence in Tamil Nadu. He became a military leader in the town of [[Ettayapuram]] and was defeated in battle against the British and Maruthanayagam's forces. He was executed in 1757.<ref>{{Cite news |title=P Chidambaram releases documentary film on Alagumuthu Kone {{!}} Madurai News |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/P-Chidambaram-releases-documentary-film-on-Alagumuthu-Kone/articleshow/17737324.cms|access-date=2020-10-01|work=The Times of India|language=en}}</ | [[Maveeran Alagumuthu Kone]] was an early rebel against the British presence in Tamil Nadu. He became a military leader in the town of [[Ettayapuram]] and was defeated in battle against the British and Maruthanayagam's forces. He was executed in 1757.<ref>{{Cite news |title=P Chidambaram releases documentary film on Alagumuthu Kone {{!}} Madurai News |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/P-Chidambaram-releases-documentary-film-on-Alagumuthu-Kone/articleshow/17737324.cms|access-date=2020-10-01|work=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=June 2023}} [[Puli Thevar]] opposed the [[Nawab of Arcot]], who was supported by the British.{{citation needed|date=June 2023}} | ||
In [[East India|Eastern India]] and across the country, Indigenous communities organized numerous rebellions against the British and their fellow members, especially [[Zamindar|landlords]] and moneylenders.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Horo|first=Albert|date=2013|title=Jharkhand Movement|url=http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v2(4)/version-2/A240106.pdf|journal=International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention|volume= 2| issue = 4|pages=1–6|via=Google Scholar}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last1=Gupta|first1=Sanjukta Das|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VDGIpkJ9BgwC|title=Narratives from the Margins: Aspects of Adivasi History in India|last2=Basu|first2=Raj Sekhar|date=2012|publisher=Primus Books|isbn=978-93-80607-10-8|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2018-03-20|title=Summary of the Tribal Rebellions during British rule in India|url=https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/summary-of-the-tribal-rebellions-during-british-rule-in-india-1521541943-1|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Jagranjosh.com}}</ref> One of the earliest of these on record was led by Binsu Manki around 1771 over the transfer of [[Jharkhand]] to the [[East India Company]].<ref name=":0" /> The Rangpur Dhing took place from 1782 to 1783 in nearby [[Rangpur, Bangladesh|Rangpur, Bengal]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=LEES|first=JAMES|date=2015|title='A Character to lose': Richard Goodlad, the Rangpur dhing, and the priorities of the East India Company's early colonial administrators|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43307694|journal=Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society|volume=25|issue=2|pages=301–315|jstor=43307694|issn=1356-1863}}</ref> Following the Binsu Manki's revolt in Jharkhand, numerous rebellions across the region took place including the [[Bhumij rebellion|Bhumij Revolt]] of [[Manbhum]] from 1798 to 1799; the [[Chero]] Uprising of [[Palamu district|Palamu]] in 1800 under the leadership of Bhukan Singh, and two uprising of the [[Munda people|Munda]] community in Tamar region, during 1807 led by Dukan Mank, and 1819-20 under the leadership Bundu and Konta.<ref name=":0" /> The Ho Rebellion took place when the [[Ho people|Ho community]] first came in contact with the British, from 1820 to 1821 near [[Chaibasa]] on the Roro River in [[West Singhbhum district|West Singhbhum]], but were defeated by the technologically enhanced colonial cavalry.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|last=Gupta|first=Sanjukta Das|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8McrAwEACAAJ|title=Adivasis and the Raj: Socio-economic Transition of the Hos, 1820-1932|date=2011|publisher=Orient Blackswan|isbn=978-81-250-4198-6|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Kumar|first=Akshay|date=2021-06-18|title=Ho Rebellion & Kol Rebellion {{!}} Jharkhand|url=https://edvnce.com/blog/ho-rebellion-kol-rebellion/|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Edvnce|language=en-US}}</ref> A larger [[Bhumij rebellion|Bhumij Revolt]] occurred near [[Midnapore|Midnapur]] in Bengal, under the leadership of [[Ganga Narayan Singh|Ganga Narain Singh]] who had previously also been involved in co-leading the [[Chuar rebellion|Chuar Rebellions]] in these regions from 1771 to 1809.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Jha|first=Jagdish Chandra|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tPjNAQAACAAJ|title=The Bhumij Revolt (1832-33): (ganga Narain's Hangama Or Turmoil)|date=1967-01-01|publisher=Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Limited|isbn=978-81-215-0353-2|language=en}}</ref> [[Syed Mir Nisar Ali Titumir]] was an Islamic preacher who led a peasant uprising against the [[Zamindars of Bengal|Hindu Zamindars of Bengal]] and the British during the 19th century. Along with his followers, he built a bamboo fort (''Bansher Kella'' in Bengali) in Narkelberia Village, which gained a prominent place into Bengali folk legend. After the storming of the fort by British soldiers, Titumir died of his wounds on 19 November 1831.<ref>Khan, Muazzam Hussain. "Titu Mir". Banglapedia. Bangladesh Asiatic Society. Retrieved 4 March 2014.</ref> These rebellions lead to larger regional movements in Jharkhand and beyond such as the [[Kol uprising|Kol Insurrection]] led by Singhray and Binray Manki, where the [[Kol people|Kol]] ([[Munda people|Munda]], [[Kurukh people|Oraon]], [[Bhumij people|Bhumij]] and [[Ho people|Ho]] communities) united to rebel against the "outsiders" from 1830 -1833.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jha|first=Jagdish Chandra|date=1958|title=THE KOL RISING OF CHOTANAGPUR (1831-33)—ITS CAUSES|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44145239|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=21|pages=440–446|jstor=44145239|issn=2249-1937}}</ref> | In [[East India|Eastern India]] and across the country, Indigenous communities organized numerous rebellions against the British and their fellow members, especially [[Zamindar|landlords]] and moneylenders.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Horo|first=Albert|date=2013|title=Jharkhand Movement|url=http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v2(4)/version-2/A240106.pdf|journal=International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention|volume= 2| issue = 4|pages=1–6|via=Google Scholar}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last1=Gupta|first1=Sanjukta Das|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VDGIpkJ9BgwC|title=Narratives from the Margins: Aspects of Adivasi History in India|last2=Basu|first2=Raj Sekhar|date=2012|publisher=Primus Books|isbn=978-93-80607-10-8|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2018-03-20|title=Summary of the Tribal Rebellions during British rule in India|url=https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/summary-of-the-tribal-rebellions-during-british-rule-in-india-1521541943-1|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Jagranjosh.com}}</ref> One of the earliest of these on record was led by Binsu Manki around 1771 over the transfer of [[Jharkhand]] to the [[East India Company]].<ref name=":0" /> The Rangpur Dhing took place from 1782 to 1783 in nearby [[Rangpur, Bangladesh|Rangpur, Bengal]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=LEES|first=JAMES|date=2015|title='A Character to lose': Richard Goodlad, the Rangpur dhing, and the priorities of the East India Company's early colonial administrators|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43307694|journal=Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society|volume=25|issue=2|pages=301–315|jstor=43307694|issn=1356-1863}}</ref> Following the Binsu Manki's revolt in Jharkhand, numerous rebellions across the region took place including the [[Bhumij rebellion|Bhumij Revolt]] of [[Manbhum]] from 1798 to 1799; the [[Chero]] Uprising of [[Palamu district|Palamu]] in 1800 under the leadership of Bhukan Singh, and two uprising of the [[Munda people|Munda]] community in Tamar region, during 1807 led by Dukan Mank, and 1819-20 under the leadership Bundu and Konta.<ref name=":0" /> The Ho Rebellion took place when the [[Ho people|Ho community]] first came in contact with the British, from 1820 to 1821 near [[Chaibasa]] on the Roro River in [[West Singhbhum district|West Singhbhum]], but were defeated by the technologically enhanced colonial cavalry.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|last=Gupta|first=Sanjukta Das|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8McrAwEACAAJ|title=Adivasis and the Raj: Socio-economic Transition of the Hos, 1820-1932|date=2011|publisher=Orient Blackswan|isbn=978-81-250-4198-6|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Kumar|first=Akshay|date=2021-06-18|title=Ho Rebellion & Kol Rebellion {{!}} Jharkhand|url=https://edvnce.com/blog/ho-rebellion-kol-rebellion/|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Edvnce|language=en-US}}</ref> A larger [[Bhumij rebellion|Bhumij Revolt]] occurred near [[Midnapore|Midnapur]] in Bengal, under the leadership of [[Ganga Narayan Singh|Ganga Narain Singh]] who had previously also been involved in co-leading the [[Chuar rebellion|Chuar Rebellions]] in these regions from 1771 to 1809.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Jha|first=Jagdish Chandra|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tPjNAQAACAAJ|title=The Bhumij Revolt (1832-33): (ganga Narain's Hangama Or Turmoil)|date=1967-01-01|publisher=Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Limited|isbn=978-81-215-0353-2|language=en}}</ref> [[Syed Mir Nisar Ali Titumir]] was an Islamic preacher who led a peasant uprising against the [[Zamindars of Bengal|Hindu Zamindars of Bengal]] and the British during the 19th century. Along with his followers, he built a bamboo fort (''Bansher Kella'' in Bengali) in Narkelberia Village, which gained a prominent place into Bengali folk legend. After the storming of the fort by British soldiers, Titumir died of his wounds on 19 November 1831.<ref>Khan, Muazzam Hussain. "Titu Mir". Banglapedia. Bangladesh Asiatic Society. Retrieved 4 March 2014.</ref> These rebellions lead to larger regional movements in Jharkhand and beyond such as the [[Kol uprising|Kol Insurrection]] led by Singhray and Binray Manki, where the [[Kol people|Kol]] ([[Munda people|Munda]], [[Kurukh people|Oraon]], [[Bhumij people|Bhumij]] and [[Ho people|Ho]] communities) united to rebel against the "outsiders" from 1830 -1833.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Jha|first=Jagdish Chandra|date=1958|title=THE KOL RISING OF CHOTANAGPUR (1831-33)—ITS CAUSES|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44145239|journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress|volume=21|pages=440–446|jstor=44145239|issn=2249-1937}}</ref> | ||
The [[Santhal rebellion|Santhal Hul]] was a movement of over 60,000 [[Santal people|Santhals]] that happened from 1855 to 1857 (but started as early as 1784) and was particularly led by siblings - brothers [[Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu|Sidhu, Kanhu]], Chand and Bhairav and their sisters Phulo and Jhano from the [[Murmu]] clan in its most fervent years that lead up to the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857|Revolt of 1857]].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https:// | The [[Santhal rebellion|Santhal Hul]] was a movement of over 60,000 [[Santal people|Santhals]] that happened from 1855 to 1857 (but started as early as 1784) and was particularly led by siblings - brothers [[Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu|Sidhu, Kanhu]], Chand and Bhairav and their sisters Phulo and Jhano from the [[Murmu]] clan in its most fervent years that lead up to the [[Indian Rebellion of 1857|Revolt of 1857]].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9T3zYvKVF98C|title=This is our homeland... a collection of essays on the betrayal of Adivasi rights in India|publisher=Equations|year=2007|location=Bangalore}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Soren|first=Nayan|date=June 30, 2020|title=Remembering Santal Hul : A quest for Indigenous sovereignty|url=http://adivasiresurgence.com/2020/06/30/remembering-santal-hul-a-quest-for-indigenous-sovereignty/|access-date=21 November 2021|website=Adivasi Resurgence}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The Forgotten Santhal Revolt of 1855|url=https://s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/img.livehistoryindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Santhal1.jpg|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Live History India|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Remembering Santal Hul, a 19th Century Struggle Against Imperialism|url=https://thewire.in/history/santal-hul-revolution|access-date=2021-11-21|website=The Wire}}</ref> More than 100 years of such escalating rebellions created grounds for a large, impactful, millenarian movement in Eastern India that again shook the foundations of British rule in the region, under the leadership of [[Birsa Munda]]. Birsa Munda belonged to the [[Munda people|Munda community]] and lead thousands of people from Munda, [[Kurukh people|Oraon]], and [[Kharia people|Kharia]] communities in "Ulgulaan" (revolt) against British political expansion and those who advanced it, against forceful conversions of Indigenous peoples into Christianity (even creating a Birsaite movement), and against the displacement of Indigenous peoples from their lands.<ref name=":3">{{Cite book|last=Singh|first=Kumar Suresh|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lFSgAAAAMAAJ|title=Birsa Munda and His Movement, 1872-1901: A Study of a Millenarian Movement in Chotanagpur|date=2002|publisher=Seagull Books|isbn=978-81-7046-205-7|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite book|last=A.K.Dhan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AEg1DwAAQBAJ|title=BIRSA MUNDA|date=2017-08-29|publisher=Publications Division Ministry of Information & Broadcasting|isbn=978-81-230-2544-5|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2019-11-15|title=About Birsa Munda [ 1875-1900 ] Biography & Life History|url=https://www.ambedkaritetoday.com/2019/11/about-birsa-munda-biography-life-history.html|access-date=2021-11-21|website=The Ambedkarite Today - Voice Of Voiceless|language=English}}</ref> To subdue these rising tensions which were getting increasingly out of control of the British, they aggressively set out to search for Birsa Munda, even setting up a reward for him. They brutally attacked the Dombari Hills where Birsa had repaired a water tank and made his revolutionary headquarters between January 7–9, 1900, murdering a minimum of 400 of the Munda warriors who had congregated there, akin to the attacks on the people at [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre|Jallianwallah Bagh]], however, receiving much less attention.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5">{{Cite web|date=2016-06-09|title=The 'Ulgulaan' of 'Dharti Aba- Birsa Munda'|url=http://adivasiresurgence.com/2016/06/09/the-ulgulaan-of-dharti-aba-birsa-munda/|access-date=2021-11-21|website=Adivasi Resurgence|language=en-US}}</ref> The hills are known as "Topped Buru" today - the mound of the dead.<ref name=":5" /> Birsa was ultimately captured in the Jamkopai forest in [[Singhbhum (Lok Sabha constituency)|Singhbhum]], and assassinated by the British in jail in 1900, with a rushed cremation/burial conducted to ensure his movement was subdued.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5" /> | ||
The toughest resistance the Company experienced was offered by Mysore. The [[Anglo-Mysore Wars]] were a series of wars fought in over the last three decades of the 18th century between the [[Kingdom of Mysore]] on the one hand, and the British East India Company (represented chiefly by the [[Madras Presidency]]), and [[Maratha Confederacy]] and the [[Nizam of Hyderabad]] on the other. [[Hyder Ali]] and his successor [[Tipu Sultan]] fought a war on four fronts with the British attacking from the west, south, and east, while the Marathas and the Nizam's forces attacked from the north. The fourth war resulted in the overthrow of the house of Hyder Ali and Tipu (who was killed in the final war, in 1799), and the dismantlement of Mysore to the benefit of the East India Company, which won and took control of much of India.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/East-India-Company|title=East India Company – Definition, History, & Facts|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref> [[Pazhassi Raja]] was the prince regent of the princely state of [[Kingdom of Kottayam|Cotiote]] in North Malabar, near [[Kannur]], India between 1774 and 1805. He fought a guerrilla war with tribal people from Wynad supporting him. He was captured by the British and his fort was razed to the ground. | The toughest resistance the Company experienced was offered by Mysore. The [[Anglo-Mysore Wars]] were a series of wars fought in over the last three decades of the 18th century between the [[Kingdom of Mysore]] on the one hand, and the British East India Company (represented chiefly by the [[Madras Presidency]]), and [[Maratha Confederacy]] and the [[Nizam of Hyderabad]] on the other. [[Hyder Ali]] and his successor [[Tipu Sultan]] fought a war on four fronts with the British attacking from the west, south, and east, while the Marathas and the Nizam's forces attacked from the north. The fourth war resulted in the overthrow of the house of Hyder Ali and Tipu (who was killed in the final war, in 1799), and the dismantlement of Mysore to the benefit of the East India Company, which won and took control of much of India.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/East-India-Company|title=East India Company – Definition, History, & Facts|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref> [[Pazhassi Raja]] was the prince regent of the princely state of [[Kingdom of Kottayam|Cotiote]] in North Malabar, near [[Kannur]], India between 1774 and 1805. He fought a guerrilla war with tribal people from Wynad supporting him. He was captured by the British and his fort was razed to the ground. | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
The indifference of the British towards native Indian rulers and the annexation of [[Oudh]] furthered dissent. The [[James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie|Marquess of Dalhousie]]'s policy of annexation, the [[doctrine of lapse]] and the projected removal of the Mughals from their ancestral palace at [[Red Fort]] also led to popular anger. | The indifference of the British towards native Indian rulers and the annexation of [[Oudh]] furthered dissent. The [[James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie|Marquess of Dalhousie]]'s policy of annexation, the [[doctrine of lapse]] and the projected removal of the Mughals from their ancestral palace at [[Red Fort]] also led to popular anger. | ||
The final spark was provided by the rumoured use of tallow (from cows) and lard (pig fat) in the newly introduced [[Pattern 1853 Enfield]] rifle cartridges. Soldiers had to bite the cartridges with their teeth before loading them into their rifles, ingesting the fat. This was | The final spark was provided by the rumoured use of tallow (from cows) and lard (pig fat) in the newly introduced [[Pattern 1853 Enfield]] rifle cartridges. Soldiers had to bite the cartridges with their teeth before loading them into their rifles, ingesting the fat. This was sacrilegious to both Hindus and Muslims.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+bd0018)|title=The Uprising of 1857|publisher=[[Library of Congress]]|access-date=10 November 2009}}</ref> | ||
[[Mangal Pandey]] was sepoy who played a key part in the events immediately preceding the outbreak of the [[Indian rebellion of 1857]]. His defiance to his British superiors and later his execution ignited the fire for [[Indian Rebellion of 1857|1857 Indian Rebellion]]. | [[Mangal Pandey]] was sepoy who played a key part in the events immediately preceding the outbreak of the [[Indian rebellion of 1857]]. His defiance to his British superiors and later his execution ignited the fire for [[Indian Rebellion of 1857|1857 Indian Rebellion]]. | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a turning point. While affirming the military and political power of the British,<ref>{{Harvnb|Heehs|1998|p=32}}</ref> it led to a significant change in how India was to be controlled by them. Under the [[Government of India Act 1858]], the East India Company's territory was transferred to the British government.<ref name="WDL">{{cite web |url = http://www.wdl.org/en/item/393/ |title = Official, India |website = [[World Digital Library]] |date = 1890–1923 |access-date = 30 May 2013 }}</ref> At the apex of the new system was a [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet minister]], the [[Secretary of State for India]], who was to be formally advised by a [[Council of India|statutory council]];<ref>{{Harvnb|Heehs|1998|pp=47–48}}</ref> the [[Governor-General of India]] (Viceroy) was made responsible to him, while he in turn was responsible to the government. | The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a turning point. While affirming the military and political power of the British,<ref>{{Harvnb|Heehs|1998|p=32}}</ref> it led to a significant change in how India was to be controlled by them. Under the [[Government of India Act 1858]], the East India Company's territory was transferred to the British government.<ref name="WDL">{{cite web |url = http://www.wdl.org/en/item/393/ |title = Official, India |website = [[World Digital Library]] |date = 1890–1923 |access-date = 30 May 2013 }}</ref> At the apex of the new system was a [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet minister]], the [[Secretary of State for India]], who was to be formally advised by a [[Council of India|statutory council]];<ref>{{Harvnb|Heehs|1998|pp=47–48}}</ref> the [[Governor-General of India]] (Viceroy) was made responsible to him, while he in turn was responsible to the government. | ||
In a [[royal proclamation]] made to the people of India, [[Victoria of the United Kingdom|Queen Victoria]] promised equal opportunity of public service under British law, and also pledged to respect the rights of native princes.<ref>{{Harvnb|Heehs|1998|p=48}}</ref> The British stopped the policy of seizing land from the princes, decreed religious tolerance and began to admit Indians into the civil service. However, they also increased the number of British soldiers in relation to native Indian ones, and allowed only British soldiers to handle artillery. Bahadur Shah II was exiled to [[Yangon|Rangoon]] where he died in 1862. | In a [[royal proclamation]] made to the people of India, [[Victoria of the United Kingdom|Queen Victoria]] promised equal opportunity of public service under British law, and also pledged to respect the rights of native princes.<ref>{{Harvnb|Heehs|1998|p=48}}</ref> The British stopped the policy of seizing land from the princes, decreed [[religious tolerance]] and began to admit Indians into the civil service. However, they also increased the number of British soldiers in relation to native Indian ones, and allowed only British soldiers to handle artillery. Bahadur Shah II was exiled to [[Yangon|Rangoon]] where he died in 1862. | ||
In 1876 the British Prime Minister [[Benjamin Disraeli]] proclaimed Queen Victoria the [[Empress of India]]. The British Liberals objected as the title was foreign to British traditions.<ref>{{cite book|last=Robert P. O'Kell|title=Disraeli: The Romance of Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0DyWAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT443|year=2014|publisher=U of Toronto Press|pages=443–44|isbn=9781442661042}}</ref> | In 1876 the British Prime Minister [[Benjamin Disraeli]] proclaimed Queen Victoria the [[Empress of India]]. The British Liberals objected as the title was foreign to British traditions.<ref>{{cite book|last=Robert P. O'Kell|title=Disraeli: The Romance of Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0DyWAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT443|year=2014|publisher=U of Toronto Press|pages=443–44|isbn=9781442661042}}</ref> | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
The decades following the Rebellion were a period of growing political awareness, the manifestation of Indian public opinion and the emergence of Indian leadership at both national and provincial levels. [[Dadabhai Naoroji]] formed the East India Association in 1867 and [[Surendranath Banerjee]] founded the [[Indian National Association]] in 1876. Inspired by a suggestion made by [[Allan Octavian Hume|A.O. Hume]], a retired Scottish civil servant, seventy-two Indian delegates met in [[Mumbai|Bombay]] in 1885 and founded the Indian National Congress.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> They were mostly members of the upwardly mobile and successful western-educated provincial elites, engaged in professions such as law, [[teaching]] and journalism. At its inception, Congress had no well-defined ideology and commanded few of the resources essential to a political organization. Instead, it functioned more as a debating society that met annually to express its loyalty to the British and passed numerous resolutions on less controversial issues such as civil rights or opportunities in government (especially in the civil service). These resolutions were submitted to the Indian government and occasionally to the British Parliament, but the Congress's early gains were slight. "Despite its claim to represent all India, the Congress voiced the interests of urban elites;<ref name="Marshall2001"/> the number of participants from other social and economic backgrounds remained negligible.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> However, this period of history is still crucial because it represented the first political mobilization of Indians, coming from all parts of the subcontinent and the first articulation of the idea of India as one nation, rather than a collection of independent princely states.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> | The decades following the Rebellion were a period of growing political awareness, the manifestation of Indian public opinion and the emergence of Indian leadership at both national and provincial levels. [[Dadabhai Naoroji]] formed the East India Association in 1867 and [[Surendranath Banerjee]] founded the [[Indian National Association]] in 1876. Inspired by a suggestion made by [[Allan Octavian Hume|A.O. Hume]], a retired Scottish civil servant, seventy-two Indian delegates met in [[Mumbai|Bombay]] in 1885 and founded the Indian National Congress.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> They were mostly members of the upwardly mobile and successful western-educated provincial elites, engaged in professions such as law, [[teaching]] and journalism. At its inception, Congress had no well-defined ideology and commanded few of the resources essential to a political organization. Instead, it functioned more as a debating society that met annually to express its loyalty to the British and passed numerous resolutions on less controversial issues such as civil rights or opportunities in government (especially in the civil service). These resolutions were submitted to the Indian government and occasionally to the British Parliament, but the Congress's early gains were slight. "Despite its claim to represent all India, the Congress voiced the interests of urban elites;<ref name="Marshall2001"/> the number of participants from other social and economic backgrounds remained negligible.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> However, this period of history is still crucial because it represented the first political mobilization of Indians, coming from all parts of the subcontinent and the first articulation of the idea of India as one nation, rather than a collection of independent princely states.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> | ||
Religious groups played a role in reforming Indian society. These were of several religions from Hindu groups such as the ''[[Arya Samaj]]'', the ''[[Brahmo Samaj]]'', to other religions. The work of men like [[Swami Vivekananda]], [[Ramakrishna]], [[Sri Aurobindo]], [[V. O. Chidambaram Pillai]], [[Subramanya Bharathy]], [[Bankim Chandra Chatterjee]], [[Rabindranath Tagore]] and [[Dadabhai Naoroji]], as well as women such as the Scots–Irish [[Sister Nivedita]], spread the passion for rejuvenation and freedom. The rediscovery of India's indigenous history by several European and Indian scholars also fed into the rise of nationalism among Indians.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> | Religious groups played a role in reforming Indian society. These were of several religions from Hindu groups such as the ''[[Arya Samaj]]'', the ''[[Brahmo Samaj]]'', to other religions, such as the [[Namdhari]] (or ''Kuka'') sect of [[Sikhism]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Chhabra |first=G.S. |title=Social and Economic History of the Panjab: (1849-1901) |publisher=S. Nagin |year=1963 |pages=129–130, 346}}</ref> The work of men like [[Swami Vivekananda]], [[Ramakrishna]], [[Sri Aurobindo]], [[V. O. Chidambaram Pillai]], [[Subramanya Bharathy]], [[Bankim Chandra Chatterjee]], [[Rabindranath Tagore]] and [[Dadabhai Naoroji]], as well as women such as the Scots–Irish [[Sister Nivedita]], spread the passion for rejuvenation and freedom. The rediscovery of India's indigenous history by several European and Indian scholars also fed into the rise of nationalism among Indians.<ref name="Marshall2001"/> | ||
The triumvirate also is known as [[Lal Bal Pal]] ([[Bal Gangadhar Tilak]], [[Bipin Chandra Pal]], [[Lala Lajpat Rai]]), along with [[V. O. Chidambaram Pillai]], [[Sri Aurobindo]], [[Surendranath Banerjee]], and [[Rabindranath Tagore]] were some of the prominent leaders of movements in the early 20th century. The [[Swadeshi movement]] was the most successful. The name of Lokmanya began spreading around and people started following him in all parts of the country. | The triumvirate also is known as [[Lal Bal Pal]] ([[Bal Gangadhar Tilak]], [[Bipin Chandra Pal]], [[Lala Lajpat Rai]]), along with [[V. O. Chidambaram Pillai]], [[Sri Aurobindo]], [[Surendranath Banerjee]], and [[Rabindranath Tagore]] were some of the prominent leaders of movements in the early 20th century. The [[Swadeshi movement]] was the most successful. The name of Lokmanya began spreading around and people started following him in all parts of the country. | ||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
==Movements== | ==Movements== | ||
===Partition of Bengal, 1905=== | ===Partition of Bengal, 1905=== | ||
{{Main|Partition of Bengal (1905) | {{Main|Partition of Bengal (1905)}} | ||
<gallery widths="200" heights="200"> | <gallery widths="200" heights="200"> | ||
File:Khudiram Bose 1905 cropped.jpg|[[Khudiram Bose]] was one of the youngest Indian revolutionaries tried and executed by the British.<ref name=Guha/> | File:Khudiram Bose 1905 cropped.jpg|[[Khudiram Bose]] was one of the youngest Indian revolutionaries tried and executed by the British.<ref name=Guha/> | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
In July 1905, [[George Curzon, 1st Marquess Curzon of Kedleston|Lord Curzon]], the Viceroy and Governor-General (1899–1905), ordered the [[Partition of Bengal (1905)|partition of the province of Bengal]]. The stated aim was to improve administration.<ref>John R. McLane, "The Decision to Partition Bengal in 1905" ''Indian Economic and Social History Review,'' July 1965, 2#3, pp 221–237</ref> However, this was seen as an attempt to quench nationalistic sentiment through [[divide and rule]]. The Bengali Hindu intelligentsia exerted considerable influence on local and national politics. The partition outraged Bengalis. Widespread agitation ensued in the streets and in the press, and the Congress advocated boycotting British products under the banner of ''[[swadeshi]]'', or indigenous industries. A growing movement emerged, focussing on indigenous Indian industries, finance, and education, which saw the founding of [[National Council of Education]], the birth of Indian financial institutions and banks, as well as an interest in Indian culture and achievements in science and literature. Hindus showed unity by tying [[Raksha Bandhan|Rakhi]] on each other's wrists and observing ''Arandhan'' (not cooking any food). During this time, Bengali Hindu nationalists like [[Sri Aurobindo]], [[Bhupendranath Datta]], and [[Bipin Chandra Pal]] began writing virulent newspaper articles challenging the legitimacy of British rule in India in publications such as ''Jugantar'' and ''Sandhya'', and were charged with sedition. | In July 1905, [[George Curzon, 1st Marquess Curzon of Kedleston|Lord Curzon]], the Viceroy and Governor-General (1899–1905), ordered the [[Partition of Bengal (1905)|partition of the province of Bengal]]. The stated aim was to improve administration.<ref>John R. McLane, "The Decision to Partition Bengal in 1905" ''Indian Economic and Social History Review,'' July 1965, 2#3, pp 221–237</ref> However, this was seen as an attempt to quench nationalistic sentiment through [[divide and rule]]. The Bengali Hindu intelligentsia exerted considerable influence on local and national politics. The partition outraged Bengalis. Widespread agitation ensued in the streets and in the press, and the Congress advocated boycotting British products under the banner of ''[[swadeshi]]'', or indigenous industries. A growing movement emerged, focussing on indigenous Indian industries, finance, and education, which saw the founding of [[National Council of Education]], the birth of Indian financial institutions and banks, as well as an interest in Indian culture and achievements in science and literature. Hindus showed unity by tying [[Raksha Bandhan|Rakhi]] on each other's wrists and observing ''Arandhan'' (not cooking any food). During this time, Bengali Hindu nationalists like [[Sri Aurobindo]], [[Bhupendranath Datta]], and [[Bipin Chandra Pal]] began writing virulent newspaper articles challenging the legitimacy of British rule in India in publications such as ''Jugantar'' and ''Sandhya'', and were charged with sedition. | ||
The Partition also precipitated increasing activity from the then still Nascent militant nationalist [[revolutionary movement for Indian independence|revolutionary movement]], which was particularly gaining strength in Bengal and Maharashtra from the last decade of the 1800s. In Bengal, [[Anushilan Samiti]], led by brothers Aurobindo and Barin Ghosh organised a number of attacks of figureheads of the Raj, culminating in the attempt on the life of a British judge in Muzaffarpur. This precipitated the [[Alipore bomb case]], whilst a number of revolutionaries were killed, or captured and put on trial. Revolutionaries like [[Khudiram Bose]], [[Prafulla Chaki]], Kanailal Dutt who were either killed or hanged became household names.<ref name=Guha>{{cite book |last=Guha |first=Arun Chandra |year=1971 |title=First Spark of Revolution |publisher=Orient Longman |pages=130–131 |oclc=254043308 |quote="They [Khudiram Basu and Prafulla Chaki] threw a bomb on a coach similar to that of Kingsford's ... Khudiram ... was sentenced to death and hanged."}}</ref> | The Partition also precipitated increasing activity from the then still Nascent militant nationalist [[revolutionary movement for Indian independence|revolutionary movement]], which was particularly gaining strength in Bengal and Maharashtra from the last decade of the 1800s. In Bengal, {{Lang|bn-latn|[[Anushilan Samiti]]|italic=no}}, led by brothers Aurobindo and Barin Ghosh organised a number of attacks of figureheads of the Raj, culminating in the attempt on the life of a British judge in Muzaffarpur. This precipitated the [[Alipore bomb case]], whilst a number of revolutionaries were killed, or captured and put on trial. Revolutionaries like [[Khudiram Bose]], [[Prafulla Chaki]], Kanailal Dutt who were either killed or hanged became household names.<ref name=Guha>{{cite book |last=Guha |first=Arun Chandra |year=1971 |title=First Spark of Revolution |publisher=Orient Longman |pages=130–131 |oclc=254043308 |quote="They [Khudiram Basu and Prafulla Chaki] threw a bomb on a coach similar to that of Kingsford's ... Khudiram ... was sentenced to death and hanged."}}</ref> | ||
The British newspaper, ''The Empire'', wrote:<ref name=Patel2008>{{Harvnb|Patel|2008|p=56}}</ref> | The British newspaper, ''The Empire'', wrote:<ref name=Patel2008>{{Harvnb|Patel|2008|p=56}}</ref> | ||
Line 206: | Line 206: | ||
|File:Indian Army QF 3.7 inch gun battery Jerusalem 1917.jpg|Indian Army gunners (probably 39th Battery) with [[3.7-inch mountain howitzer]]s, Jerusalem 1917. | |File:Indian Army QF 3.7 inch gun battery Jerusalem 1917.jpg|Indian Army gunners (probably 39th Battery) with [[3.7-inch mountain howitzer]]s, Jerusalem 1917. | ||
|File:Rash Behari Bose 02.jpg|[[Rash Behari Bose]], was one of the key organisers of the [[Ghadar Mutiny]] and later the [[Indian National Army]]. | |File:Rash Behari Bose 02.jpg|[[Rash Behari Bose]], was one of the key organisers of the [[Ghadar Mutiny]] and later the [[Indian National Army]]. | ||
|File:Komogata Maru LAC a034014 1914.jpg|Punjabi Sikhs aboard | |File:Komogata Maru LAC a034014 1914.jpg|Punjabi Sikhs aboard the {{SS|Komagata Maru}} in Vancouver's [[Burrard Inlet]], 1914. Most of the passengers were not allowed to land in Canada and the ship was forced to return to India. The events surrounding the [[Komagata Maru incident]] served as a catalyst for the Ghadarite cause. | ||
}} | }} | ||
The First World War began with an unprecedented outpouring of support towards Britain from within the mainstream political leadership. Contrary to initial British fears of an Indian revolt, Indians contributed considerably to the British war effort by providing men and resources. About 1.3 million Indian soldiers and labourers served in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, while both the Indian government and the princes sent large supplies of food, money, and ammunition. Nonetheless, Bengal and [[Punjab (British India)|Punjab]] remained hotbeds of [[Revolutionary movement for Indian independence|anti-colonial activities]]. Nationalism in Bengal, increasingly associated with the [[Ghadar Mutiny|unrest in Punjab]], was of significant ferocity to almost complete the paralysis of the regional administration. Meanwhile, [[Hindu-German Conspiracy|failed conspiracies]] were triggered by revolutionaries lack of preparedness to organise a nationalist revolt.<ref name=Gupta12>{{Harvnb|Gupta|1997|p=12}}</ref><ref name="Popplewell 1995 p=201">{{Harvnb|Popplewell|1995|p=201}}</ref> | The First World War began with an unprecedented outpouring of support towards Britain from within the mainstream political leadership. Contrary to initial British fears of an Indian revolt, Indians contributed considerably to the British war effort by providing men and resources. About 1.3 million Indian soldiers and labourers served in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, while both the Indian government and the princes sent large supplies of food, money, and ammunition. Nonetheless, Bengal and [[Punjab (British India)|Punjab]] remained hotbeds of [[Revolutionary movement for Indian independence|anti-colonial activities]]. Nationalism in Bengal, increasingly associated with the [[Ghadar Mutiny|unrest in Punjab]], was of significant ferocity to almost complete the paralysis of the regional administration. Meanwhile, [[Hindu-German Conspiracy|failed conspiracies]] were triggered by revolutionaries lack of preparedness to organise a nationalist revolt.<ref name=Gupta12>{{Harvnb|Gupta|1997|p=12}}</ref><ref name="Popplewell 1995 p=201">{{Harvnb|Popplewell|1995|p=201}}</ref> | ||
Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
Sir Sidney Arthur Taylor Rowlatt (cropped).jpg|[[Sidney Rowlatt]], best remembered for his controversial presidency of the [[Rowlatt Committee]], a [[sedition]] committee appointed in 1918 by the [[British Raj|British Indian]] Government to evaluate the links between [[political terrorism]] in [[Presidencies and provinces of British India|India]], the actions indirectly led to the infamous [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] of 1919. | Sir Sidney Arthur Taylor Rowlatt (cropped).jpg|[[Sidney Rowlatt]], best remembered for his controversial presidency of the [[Rowlatt Committee]], a [[sedition]] committee appointed in 1918 by the [[British Raj|British Indian]] Government to evaluate the links between [[political terrorism]] in [[Presidencies and provinces of British India|India]], the actions indirectly led to the infamous [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] of 1919. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Gandhi had been a leader of the Indian nationalist movement in [[South Africa]]. He had also been a vocal opponent of basic discrimination and abusive labour treatment as well as suppressive police control such as the [[Rowlatt Acts]]. During these protests, Gandhi had perfected the concept of ''[[satyagraha]]''. In January 1914 (well before the First World War began) Gandhi was successful. The legislation against Indians was repealed and all Indian political prisoners were released by General [[Jan Smuts]].<ref>Denis Judd, ''Empire: The British Imperial Experience From 1765 To The Present'' (pp. 226—411, 998)</ref> Gandhi accomplished this through extensive use of non-violent protests, such as boycotting, protest marching, and fasting by him and his followers.<ref>{{cite web |title = The Indian Independence Movement |url = http://www.tcnj.edu/ |access-date=29 May 2014 }}</ref> | Gandhi had been a leader of the Indian nationalist movement in [[South Africa]]. He had also been a vocal opponent of basic discrimination and abusive labour treatment as well as suppressive police control such as the [[Rowlatt Acts]]. During these protests, Gandhi had perfected the concept of ''[[satyagraha]]''. In January 1914 (well before the First World War began) Gandhi was successful. The legislation against Indians was repealed and all Indian political prisoners were released by General [[Jan Smuts]].<ref>Denis Judd, ''Empire: The British Imperial Experience From 1765 To The Present'' (pp. 226—411, 998)</ref> Gandhi accomplished this through extensive use of non-violent protests, such as boycotting, protest marching, and fasting by him and his followers.<ref>{{cite web |title = The Indian Independence Movement |url = http://www.tcnj.edu/ |access-date=29 May 2014 }}</ref> | ||
Gandhi returned to India on 9 January 1915, and initially entered the political fray not with calls for a nation-state, but in support of the unified commerce-oriented territory that the Congress Party had been asking for. Gandhi believed that the industrial development and educational development that the Europeans had brought were long required to alleviate many of India's chronic problems. [[Gopal Krishna Gokhale]], a veteran Congressman and Indian leader, became Gandhi's mentor. Gandhi's ideas and strategies of non-violent [[civil disobedience]] initially appeared impractical to some Indians and their Congress leaders. In the Mahatma's own words, "civil disobedience is civil breach of immoral statutory enactments." It had to be carried out non-violently by withdrawing co-operation with the corrupt state. Gandhi had great respect for [[Lokmanya Tilak]]. His programmes were all inspired by Tilak's "Chatusutri" programme. | Gandhi returned to India on 9 January 1915, and initially entered the political fray not with calls for a nation-state, but in support of the unified commerce-oriented territory that the Congress Party had been asking for. Gandhi believed that the industrial development and educational development that the Europeans had brought were long required to alleviate many of India's chronic problems. [[Gopal Krishna Gokhale]], a veteran Congressman and Indian leader, became Gandhi's mentor. Gandhi's ideas and strategies of non-violent [[civil disobedience]] initially appeared impractical to some Indians and their Congress leaders. In the Mahatma's own words, "civil disobedience is civil breach of immoral statutory enactments." It had to be carried out non-violently by withdrawing co-operation with the corrupt state. Gandhi had great respect for [[Lokmanya Tilak]]. His programmes were all inspired by Tilak's "Chatusutri" programme. | ||
Line 267: | Line 267: | ||
===First non-co-operation movement=== | ===First non-co-operation movement=== | ||
[[File:Gandhi smiling R.jpg|thumb|250px|Mahatma Gandhi.]] | |||
From 1920 to 1922, Gandhi started the Non-Cooperation Movement. At the Kolkata session of the Congress in September 1920, Gandhi convinced other leaders of the need to start a non-co-operation movement in support of [[Khilafat movement|Khilafat]] as well as for dominion status. The first satyagraha movement urged the use of [[khadi]] and Indian material as alternatives to those shipped from Britain. It also urged people to boycott British educational institutions and law courts, resign from government employment, refuse to pay taxes, and forsake British titles and honors. Although this came too late to influence the framing of the new ''[[Government of India Act 1919]]'', the movement enjoyed widespread popular support, and the resulting unparalleled magnitude of disorder presented a serious challenge to foreign rule. However, Gandhi called off the movement because he was scared after the [[Chauri Chaura incident]], which saw the death of twenty-two policemen at the hands of an angry mob that India would descend into anarchy. | From 1920 to 1922, Gandhi started the Non-Cooperation Movement. At the Kolkata session of the Congress in September 1920, Gandhi convinced other leaders of the need to start a non-co-operation movement in support of [[Khilafat movement|Khilafat]] as well as for dominion status. The first satyagraha movement urged the use of [[khadi]] and Indian material as alternatives to those shipped from Britain. It also urged people to boycott British educational institutions and law courts, resign from government employment, refuse to pay taxes, and forsake British titles and honors. Although this came too late to influence the framing of the new ''[[Government of India Act 1919]]'', the movement enjoyed widespread popular support, and the resulting unparalleled magnitude of disorder presented a serious challenge to foreign rule. However, Gandhi called off the movement because he was scared after the [[Chauri Chaura incident]], which saw the death of twenty-two policemen at the hands of an angry mob that India would descend into anarchy. | ||
Line 276: | Line 277: | ||
===Result of movements by Gandhi=== | ===Result of movements by Gandhi=== | ||
[[File:Marche sel.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Gandhi]] leading the famous 1930 [[Salt March]], a notable example of ''satyagraha''.]] | |||
The mass movements sparked nationalist sentiment with the Indian populace and figures like Mahatma Gandhi united a nation behind his non-violence movement; philosophy and undoubtedly put crucial pressure on the British occupation. The movements failed in their primary objective, achieving independence for India, as they were often called off before they naturally concluded due to laws and punishment. While in the later years of the Raj economic factors like the reversing trade fortunes between Britain and India and the cost of fielding the Indian armed forces abroad lumped on the British taxpayer by the 1935 Government of India act, had mounting implications for British administration, united resistance further drew light on the growing disparity of the British failures to achieve solidarity over India. | The mass movements sparked nationalist sentiment with the Indian populace and figures like Mahatma Gandhi united a nation behind his non-violence movement; philosophy and undoubtedly put crucial pressure on the British occupation. The movements failed in their primary objective, achieving independence for India, as they were often called off before they naturally concluded due to laws and punishment. While in the later years of the Raj economic factors like the reversing trade fortunes between Britain and India and the cost of fielding the Indian armed forces abroad lumped on the British taxpayer by the 1935 Government of India act, had mounting implications for British administration, united resistance further drew light on the growing disparity of the British failures to achieve solidarity over India. | ||
Line 287: | Line 290: | ||
Chauri chaura new photo.jpg|Chauri Chaura Shahid Samarak, which is a memorial to the [[Chauri Chaura incident]], when a large group of protesters, participating in the Non-cooperation movement, clashed with police, who opened fire. | Chauri chaura new photo.jpg|Chauri Chaura Shahid Samarak, which is a memorial to the [[Chauri Chaura incident]], when a large group of protesters, participating in the Non-cooperation movement, clashed with police, who opened fire. | ||
Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari.jpg|[[C. Rajagopalachari]], was an Indian nationalist who participated in the agitations against the [[Rowlatt Act]], joining the [[Non-cooperation movement]], the [[Vaikom Satyagraha]], and the [[Civil disobedience movement]]. | Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari.jpg|[[C. Rajagopalachari]], was an Indian nationalist who participated in the agitations against the [[Rowlatt Act]], joining the [[Non-cooperation movement]], the [[Vaikom Satyagraha]], and the [[Civil disobedience movement]]. | ||
File:Nehru in 1930.jpg|[[Jawaharlal Nehru]] in 1929 demanded "complete independence from Great Britain." | |||
Sardar patel (cropped).jpg|[[Vallabhbhai Patel]] was appointed as the 49th [[List of Presidents of the Indian National Congress|President of Indian National Congress]], organising the party for elections in 1934 and 1937 while promoting the [[Quit India Movement]]. | Sardar patel (cropped).jpg|[[Vallabhbhai Patel]] was appointed as the 49th [[List of Presidents of the Indian National Congress|President of Indian National Congress]], organising the party for elections in 1934 and 1937 while promoting the [[Quit India Movement]]. | ||
1931 Flag of India.svg|The flag adopted, during the Purna Swaraj movement, in 1931 and used by [[Arzi Hukumate Azad Hind|Provisional Government during the subsequent years of Second World War]]. | 1931 Flag of India.svg|The flag adopted, during the Purna Swaraj movement, in 1931 and used by [[Arzi Hukumate Azad Hind|Provisional Government during the subsequent years of Second World War]]. | ||
Line 301: | Line 305: | ||
==Elections and the Lahore resolution== | ==Elections and the Lahore resolution== | ||
{{Main|1937 Indian provincial elections}} | {{Main|1937 Indian provincial elections}} | ||
[[File:Jinnah Gandhi.jpg|thumb| | [[File:Jinnah Gandhi.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Muhammad Ali Jinnah|Jinnah]] with [[Mahatma Gandhi]], 1944.]] | ||
[[File:Gandhi at Peshawar meeting.jpg|thumb| | [[File:Gandhi at Peshawar meeting.jpg|thumb|250px|Gandhi and [[Abdul Ghaffar Khan]] at a pro-independence rally in [[Peshawar]], 1938]] | ||
The [[Government of India Act 1935]], the voluminous and final constitutional effort at governing [[British India]], articulated three major goals: establishing a loose federal structure, achieving provincial autonomy, and safeguarding minority interests through separate electorates. The federal provisions, intended to unite [[princely state]]s and British India at the centre, were not implemented because of ambiguities in safeguarding the existing privileges of princes. In February 1937, however, provincial autonomy became a reality when elections were held; the Congress emerged as the dominant party with a clear majority in five provinces and held an upper hand in two, while the Muslim League performed poorly. | The [[Government of India Act 1935]], the voluminous and final constitutional effort at governing [[British India]], articulated three major goals: establishing a loose federal structure, achieving provincial autonomy, and safeguarding minority interests through separate electorates. The federal provisions, intended to unite [[princely state]]s and British India at the centre, were not implemented because of ambiguities in safeguarding the existing privileges of princes. In February 1937, however, provincial autonomy became a reality when elections were held; the Congress emerged as the dominant party with a clear majority in five provinces and held an upper hand in two, while the Muslim League performed poorly. | ||
Line 321: | Line 325: | ||
Apart from a few stray incidents, armed rebellions against the British rulers did not occur before the beginning of the 20th century. The Indian revolutionary underground began gathering momentum through the first decade of the 20th century, with groups arising in Bengal, [[Maharashtra]], [[Odisha]], Bihar, [[Uttar Pradesh]], [[Punjab (British India)|Punjab]], and the [[Madras Presidency]] including what is now called [[South India]]. More groups were scattered around India. Particularly notable movements arose in Bengal, especially around the [[Partition of Bengal (1905)|Partition of Bengal]] in 1905, and in [[1907 Punjab unrest|Punjab after 1907]].<ref name=Fraser257>{{Harvnb|Fraser|1977|p=257}}</ref> In the former case, it was the educated, intelligent and dedicated youth of the urban middle class ''[[Bhadralok]]'' community that came to form the "classic" Indian revolutionary,<ref name="Fraser257"/> while the latter had an immense support base in the rural and military society of Punjab. | Apart from a few stray incidents, armed rebellions against the British rulers did not occur before the beginning of the 20th century. The Indian revolutionary underground began gathering momentum through the first decade of the 20th century, with groups arising in Bengal, [[Maharashtra]], [[Odisha]], Bihar, [[Uttar Pradesh]], [[Punjab (British India)|Punjab]], and the [[Madras Presidency]] including what is now called [[South India]]. More groups were scattered around India. Particularly notable movements arose in Bengal, especially around the [[Partition of Bengal (1905)|Partition of Bengal]] in 1905, and in [[1907 Punjab unrest|Punjab after 1907]].<ref name=Fraser257>{{Harvnb|Fraser|1977|p=257}}</ref> In the former case, it was the educated, intelligent and dedicated youth of the urban middle class ''[[Bhadralok]]'' community that came to form the "classic" Indian revolutionary,<ref name="Fraser257"/> while the latter had an immense support base in the rural and military society of Punjab. | ||
In Bengal, the | In Bengal, the {{Lang|bn-latn|[[Anushilan Samiti]]}} emerged [[History of the Anushilan Samiti|from conglomerations]] of local youth groups and gyms (''Akhra'') in Bengal in 1902, forming two prominent and somewhat independent arms in [[East Bengal|East]] and [[West Bengal]] identified as {{Lang|bn-latn|[[Dhaka Anushilan Samiti]]}} in [[Dhaka]] (modern-day [[Bangladesh]]), and the ''[[Jugantar]]'' group (centred at [[Calcutta]]) respectively. Led by nationalists of the likes of [[Aurobindo Ghosh]] and his brother [[Barindra Ghosh]], the ''Samiti'' was influenced by philosophies as diverse as [[Hindu]] [[Shakti|''Shakta'' philosophy]] propounded by Bengali literature [[Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay|Bankim]] and [[Swami Vivekananda|Vivekananda]], [[Carbonari|Italian Nationalism]], and [[Pan-Asianism]] of [[Kakuzo Okakura]]. The ''Samiti'' was involved in a number of noted incidences of revolutionary terrorism against British interests and administration in India within the decade of its founding, including [[Alipore bomb case|early attempts]] to assassinate Raj officials whilst led by Ghosh brothers. In the meantime, in Maharashtra and Punjab arose similarly militant nationalist feelings. The District Magistrate of [[Nasik]], [[A.M.T. Jackson]] was shot dead by [[Anant Kanhere]] in December 1909, followed by the death of [[Robert D'Escourt Ashe]] at the hands of [[Vanchi Iyer]].<ref name=Yadav4>{{Harvnb|Yadav|1992|p=4}}</ref>{{citation not found|date=February 2019}} | ||
Indian nationalism made headway through Indian societies as far as Paris and London. In London [[India House]] under the patronage of [[Shyamji Krishna Verma]] came under increasing scrutiny for championing and justifying violence in the cause of Indian nationalism, which found in Indian students in Britain and from Indian expatriates in [[Paris Indian Society]] avid followers. By 1907, through Indian nationalist [[Madame Bhikaji Rustom Cama]]'s links to Russian revolutionary Nicholas Safranski, Indian groups including Bengal revolutionaries as well as India House under [[V.D. Savarkar]] were able to obtain manuals for manufacturing bombs. India House was also a source of arms and seditious literature that was rapidly distributed in India. In addition to ''The Indian Sociologist'', pamphlets like ''Bande Mataram'' and ''Oh Martyrs!'' by Savarkar extolled revolutionary violence. Direct influences and incitement from India House were noted in several incidents of political violence, including assassinations, in India at the time.<ref name="Yadav4"/><ref name=Hopkirk46>{{Harvnb|Hopkirk|1994|p=46}} [By 1909] India House was beginning to come under suspicion ... too late to save Sir William Curzon Wyllie from the assassin's pistol ... Savarkar could see that London was rapidly becoming too hot for him ... In early January 1910, therefore, he slipped quietly over to Paris, determined to make it his new revolutionary headquarters ... [police] managed to obtain evidence linking him with the smuggling of firearms into India.</ref><ref name=Majumdar1966p>{{Harvnb|Majumdar|1966|p=147}} Savarkar's ''Bande Mataram'' contained exhortations [advocating terrorism] ... This sort of propaganda produced a natural effect. A. M. T. Jackson, the Magistrate ... was shot dead on 21 December 1909 ... charges against him [Savarkar] included the sending of pistols and seditious pamphlets to India. Another charge was that in 1908 he with the help of residents in the India House manifolded in type a number of copies of a work describing minutely the manner of preparing explosives and bombs. He despatched these copies to various addresses in India.</ref> One of the two charges against Savarkar during his trial in Bombay was for abetting the murder of the District Magistrate of Nasik, A.M.T. Jackson, by [[Anant Kanhere]] in December 1909. The arms used were directly traced through an Italian courier to India House. Ex-India House residents M.P.T. Acharya and V.V.S. Aiyar were noted in the [[Rowlatt report]] to have aided and influenced political assassinations, including the murder of Robert D'Escourt Ashe.<ref name="Yadav4"/> The Paris-Safranski link was strongly suggested by French police to be involved in a 1907 attempt in Bengal to derail the train carrying the Lieutenant-Governor [[Sir Andrew Fraser]].<ref name=Popplewell135>{{Harvnb|Popplewell|1995|p=135}}</ref> | Indian nationalism made headway through Indian societies as far as Paris and London. In London [[India House]] under the patronage of [[Shyamji Krishna Verma]] came under increasing scrutiny for championing and justifying violence in the cause of Indian nationalism, which found in Indian students in Britain and from Indian expatriates in [[Paris Indian Society]] avid followers. By 1907, through Indian nationalist [[Madame Bhikaji Rustom Cama]]'s links to Russian revolutionary Nicholas Safranski, Indian groups including Bengal revolutionaries as well as India House under [[V.D. Savarkar]] were able to obtain manuals for manufacturing bombs. India House was also a source of arms and seditious literature that was rapidly distributed in India. In addition to ''The Indian Sociologist'', pamphlets like ''Bande Mataram'' and ''Oh Martyrs!'' by Savarkar extolled revolutionary violence. Direct influences and incitement from India House were noted in several incidents of political violence, including assassinations, in India at the time.<ref name="Yadav4"/><ref name=Hopkirk46>{{Harvnb|Hopkirk|1994|p=46}} [By 1909] India House was beginning to come under suspicion ... too late to save Sir William Curzon Wyllie from the assassin's pistol ... Savarkar could see that London was rapidly becoming too hot for him ... In early January 1910, therefore, he slipped quietly over to Paris, determined to make it his new revolutionary headquarters ... [police] managed to obtain evidence linking him with the smuggling of firearms into India.</ref><ref name=Majumdar1966p>{{Harvnb|Majumdar|1966|p=147}} Savarkar's ''Bande Mataram'' contained exhortations [advocating terrorism] ... This sort of propaganda produced a natural effect. A. M. T. Jackson, the Magistrate ... was shot dead on 21 December 1909 ... charges against him [Savarkar] included the sending of pistols and seditious pamphlets to India. Another charge was that in 1908 he with the help of residents in the India House manifolded in type a number of copies of a work describing minutely the manner of preparing explosives and bombs. He despatched these copies to various addresses in India.</ref> One of the two charges against Savarkar during his trial in Bombay was for abetting the murder of the District Magistrate of Nasik, A.M.T. Jackson, by [[Anant Kanhere]] in December 1909. The arms used were directly traced through an Italian courier to India House. Ex-India House residents M.P.T. Acharya and V.V.S. Aiyar were noted in the [[Rowlatt report]] to have aided and influenced political assassinations, including the murder of Robert D'Escourt Ashe.<ref name="Yadav4"/> The Paris-Safranski link was strongly suggested by French police to be involved in a 1907 attempt in Bengal to derail the train carrying the Lieutenant-Governor [[Sir Andrew Fraser]].<ref name=Popplewell135>{{Harvnb|Popplewell|1995|p=135}}</ref> | ||
Line 340: | Line 344: | ||
The HSRA had strong influences from leftist ideologies. [[Hindustan Socialist Republican Association]] (HSRA) was formed under the leadership of [[Chandrasekhar Azad]]. [[Kakori train robbery]] was done largely by the members of HSRA. A number of Congress leaders from Bengal, especially [[Subhash Chandra Bose]], were accused by the British Government of having links with and allowing patronage to the revolutionary organisations during this time. The violence and radical philosophy revived in the 1930s, when revolutionaries of the ''Samiti'' and the HSRA were involved in the [[Chittagong armoury raid]] and the [[Kakori conspiracy]] and other attempts against the administration in British India and Raj officials. [[Sachindra Nath Sanyal]] mentored revolutionaries in the [[Hindustan Socialist Republican Army]] (HSRA), including Bhagat Singh and [[Jatindra Nath Das]], among others; including arms training and how to make bombs.<ref name="Chatterji">{{cite book |title=Filming Reality: The Independent Documentary Movement in India |first=Shoma A. |last=Chatterji |publisher=SAGE Publications India |year=2015 |isbn=978-9-35150-543-3 |page=36 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xV0lDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT36}}</ref> [[Bhagat Singh]] and [[Batukeshwar Dutt]] threw a bomb inside the [[Central Legislative Assembly]] on 8 April 1929 protesting against the passage of the Public Safety Bill and the Trade Disputes Bill while raising slogans of "[[Inquilab Zindabad]]", though no one was killed or injured in the bomb incident. Bhagat Singh surrendered after the bombing incident and a trial was conducted. Sukhdev and Rajguru were also arrested by police during search operations after the bombing incident. Following the trial (Central Assembly Bomb Case), Bhagat Singh, [[Sukhdev]] and [[Shivaram Rajguru|Rajguru]] were hanged in 1931. [[Allama Mashriqi]] founded [[Khaksars|Khaksar Tehreek]] in order to direct particularly the Muslims towards the self-rule movement.<ref>Khaksar Tehrik Ki Jiddo Juhad Volume 1. Author Khaksar Sher Zaman</ref> Some of its members left for the Indian National Congress then led by Subhas Chandra Bose, while others identified more closely with [[Communism]]. The ''Jugantar'' branch formally dissolved in 1938. On 13 March 1940, [[Udham Singh]] shot [[Michael O'Dwyer]] (the last political murder outside India), generally held responsible for the [[Amritsar Massacre]], in London. However, the revolutionary movement gradually disseminated into the Gandhian movement. As the political scenario changed in the late 1930s — with the mainstream leaders considering several options offered by the British and with religious politics coming into play — revolutionary activities gradually declined. Many past revolutionaries joined mainstream politics by joining [[Indian National Congress|Congress]] and other parties, especially [[Communist involvement in Indian Independence movement|communist ones]], while many of the activists were kept under hold in different jails across the country. Indians who were based in the UK, joined [[India League|the India League]] and the [[Indian Workers' Association|Indian Workers Association]], partaking in revolutionary activities in Britain.<ref>{{Cite book |editor-last=Nasta |editor-first=Susheila |year=2013 |title=India in Britain : South Asian networks and connections, 1858-1950 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-0-230-39271-7|location=New York|oclc=802321049}}</ref> | The HSRA had strong influences from leftist ideologies. [[Hindustan Socialist Republican Association]] (HSRA) was formed under the leadership of [[Chandrasekhar Azad]]. [[Kakori train robbery]] was done largely by the members of HSRA. A number of Congress leaders from Bengal, especially [[Subhash Chandra Bose]], were accused by the British Government of having links with and allowing patronage to the revolutionary organisations during this time. The violence and radical philosophy revived in the 1930s, when revolutionaries of the ''Samiti'' and the HSRA were involved in the [[Chittagong armoury raid]] and the [[Kakori conspiracy]] and other attempts against the administration in British India and Raj officials. [[Sachindra Nath Sanyal]] mentored revolutionaries in the [[Hindustan Socialist Republican Army]] (HSRA), including Bhagat Singh and [[Jatindra Nath Das]], among others; including arms training and how to make bombs.<ref name="Chatterji">{{cite book |title=Filming Reality: The Independent Documentary Movement in India |first=Shoma A. |last=Chatterji |publisher=SAGE Publications India |year=2015 |isbn=978-9-35150-543-3 |page=36 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xV0lDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT36}}</ref> [[Bhagat Singh]] and [[Batukeshwar Dutt]] threw a bomb inside the [[Central Legislative Assembly]] on 8 April 1929 protesting against the passage of the Public Safety Bill and the Trade Disputes Bill while raising slogans of "[[Inquilab Zindabad]]", though no one was killed or injured in the bomb incident. Bhagat Singh surrendered after the bombing incident and a trial was conducted. Sukhdev and Rajguru were also arrested by police during search operations after the bombing incident. Following the trial (Central Assembly Bomb Case), Bhagat Singh, [[Sukhdev]] and [[Shivaram Rajguru|Rajguru]] were hanged in 1931. [[Allama Mashriqi]] founded [[Khaksars|Khaksar Tehreek]] in order to direct particularly the Muslims towards the self-rule movement.<ref>Khaksar Tehrik Ki Jiddo Juhad Volume 1. Author Khaksar Sher Zaman</ref> Some of its members left for the Indian National Congress then led by Subhas Chandra Bose, while others identified more closely with [[Communism]]. The ''Jugantar'' branch formally dissolved in 1938. On 13 March 1940, [[Udham Singh]] shot [[Michael O'Dwyer]] (the last political murder outside India), generally held responsible for the [[Amritsar Massacre]], in London. However, the revolutionary movement gradually disseminated into the Gandhian movement. As the political scenario changed in the late 1930s — with the mainstream leaders considering several options offered by the British and with religious politics coming into play — revolutionary activities gradually declined. Many past revolutionaries joined mainstream politics by joining [[Indian National Congress|Congress]] and other parties, especially [[Communist involvement in Indian Independence movement|communist ones]], while many of the activists were kept under hold in different jails across the country. Indians who were based in the UK, joined [[India League|the India League]] and the [[Indian Workers' Association|Indian Workers Association]], partaking in revolutionary activities in Britain.<ref>{{Cite book |editor-last=Nasta |editor-first=Susheila |year=2013 |title=India in Britain : South Asian networks and connections, 1858-1950 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-0-230-39271-7|location=New York|oclc=802321049}}</ref> | ||
Within a short time of its inception, these organisations became the focus of an extensive police and intelligence operations. Operations against | Within a short time of its inception, these organisations became the focus of an extensive police and intelligence operations. Operations against {{Lang|bn-latn|[[Anushilan Samiti]]}} saw founding of the [[Special Branch]] of [[Calcutta Police]]. The intelligence operations against India House saw the founding of the [[Indian Political Intelligence Office]] which later grew to be the Intelligence Bureau in independent India. Heading the intelligence and missions against Ghadarite movement and India revolutionaries was the [[MI5(g)]] section, and at one point involved the [[Pinkerton's]] detective agency. Notable officers who led the police and intelligence operations against Indian revolutionaries, or were involved in it, at various time included [[John Arnold Wallinger]], [[Sir Robert Nathan]], [[Sir Harold Stuart]], [[Vernon Kell]], [[Sir Charles Stevenson-Moore]] and [[Sir Charles Tegart]], as well as [[W. Somerset Maugham]]. The threat posed by the activities of the ''Samiti'' in Bengal during [[World War I]], along with the threat of a [[Ghadar mutiny|Ghadarite uprising in Punjab]], saw the passage of [[Defence of India Act 1915]]. These measures saw the arrest, internment, transportations, and execution of a number of revolutionaries linked to the organisation, and was successful in crushing the East Bengal Branch. In the aftermath of the war, the [[Rowlatt committee]] recommended extending the Defence of India Act (as the [[Rowlatt act]]) to thwart any possible revival of the ''Samiti'' in Bengal and the Ghadarite movement in Punjab. | ||
In the 1920s, [[Alluri Sitarama Raju]] led the ill-fated [[Rampa Rebellion of 1922]]–24, during which a band of tribal leaders and other sympathisers fought against the British Raj. Local people referred to him as "Manyam Veerudu" ("Hero of the Jungles"). After the passage of the 1882 Madras Forest Act, its restrictions on the free movement of tribal peoples in the forest prevented them from engaging in their traditional ''[[Podu (agriculture)|podu]]'' ([[Slash-and-burn]]) agricultural system, which involved [[shifting cultivation]]. Raju started a protest movement in the border areas of the Godavari Agency part of [[Madras Presidency]] (present-day [[Andhra Pradesh]]). Inspired by the patriotic zeal of revolutionaries in Bengal, Raju raided police stations in and around [[Chintapalle, Visakhapatnam|Chintapalle]], [[Rampachodavaram]], [[Dammanapalli]], Krishna Devi Peta, [[Rajavommangi]], [[Addateegala]], [[Narsipatnam]] and [[Annavaram]]. Raju and his followers stole guns and ammunition and killed several [[British Indian Army]] officers, including Scott Coward near [[Dammanapalli]].<ref name="Balakrishna">{{cite web|last=Balakrishna|first=V.G.|title=Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh|url=http://pib.nic.in/feature/feyr98/fe0798/PIBF0707982.html|publisher=Government of India Press Information Bureau|access-date=28 March 2011}}</ref> The British campaign lasted for nearly a year from December 1922. Raju was eventually trapped by the British in the forests of Chintapalli then tied to a tree and shot dead with a rifle.<ref name="Balakrishna"/> | In the 1920s, [[Alluri Sitarama Raju]] led the ill-fated [[Rampa Rebellion of 1922]]–24, during which a band of tribal leaders and other sympathisers fought against the British Raj. Local people referred to him as "Manyam Veerudu" ("Hero of the Jungles"). After the passage of the 1882 Madras Forest Act, its restrictions on the free movement of tribal peoples in the forest prevented them from engaging in their traditional ''[[Podu (agriculture)|podu]]'' ([[Slash-and-burn]]) agricultural system, which involved [[shifting cultivation]]. Raju started a protest movement in the border areas of the Godavari Agency part of [[Madras Presidency]] (present-day [[Andhra Pradesh]]). Inspired by the patriotic zeal of revolutionaries in Bengal, Raju raided police stations in and around [[Chintapalle, Visakhapatnam|Chintapalle]], [[Rampachodavaram]], [[Dammanapalli]], Krishna Devi Peta, [[Rajavommangi]], [[Addateegala]], [[Narsipatnam]] and [[Annavaram]]. Raju and his followers stole guns and ammunition and killed several [[British Indian Army]] officers, including Scott Coward near [[Dammanapalli]].<ref name="Balakrishna">{{cite web|last=Balakrishna|first=V.G.|title=Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh|url=http://pib.nic.in/feature/feyr98/fe0798/PIBF0707982.html|publisher=Government of India Press Information Bureau|access-date=28 March 2011}}</ref> The British campaign lasted for nearly a year from December 1922. Raju was eventually trapped by the British in the forests of Chintapalli then tied to a tree and shot dead with a rifle.<ref name="Balakrishna"/> | ||
Line 385: | Line 389: | ||
The self-rule movement included the [[Kakori conspiracy]] (9 August 1925) led by Indian youth under the leadership of [[Pandit Ram Prasad Bismil]] and masterminded by [[Rajendra Lahiri]]; and the [[Azad Hind]] movement, whose main protagonist [[Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose]] was a former leader of Congress. From its earliest wartime inception, Bose joined the [[Axis Powers]] to fight Britain. | The self-rule movement included the [[Kakori conspiracy]] (9 August 1925) led by Indian youth under the leadership of [[Pandit Ram Prasad Bismil]] and masterminded by [[Rajendra Lahiri]]; and the [[Azad Hind]] movement, whose main protagonist [[Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose]] was a former leader of Congress. From its earliest wartime inception, Bose joined the [[Axis Powers]] to fight Britain. | ||
===Quit India Movement=== | ===Quit India Movement=== | ||
Line 434: | Line 418: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
A number of violent incidents against British officials also took place during the Quit India movement around the country. The British arrested tens of thousands of leaders, keeping them imprisoned until 1945. Ultimately, the British government realised that India was ungovernable in the long run, and the question for the postwar era became how to exit gracefully and peacefully. | |||
===Others=== | |||
{{Main|Indian National Army|Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind| Direct Action Day|Noakhali riots|Royal Indian Navy Mutiny}} | |||
{{See also| Legion Freies Indien|Battaglione Azad Hindoustan|Capt. Mohan Singh|Indian Independence League|INA trials}} | |||
{{Gallery|align=center | |||
|width=180|lines=4 | |||
|File:Fujiwara Kikan.jpg|Major [[Iwaichi Fujiwara]] greets [[Mohan Singh (general)|Mohan Singh]], leader of the [[First Indian National Army]]. ''Circa'' April 1942. | |||
|File:Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.jpg|[[Subhas Chandra Bose]] founded the [[Indian Legion]] and revamped the [[Indian National Army]]. | |||
|File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-263-1580-05, Atlantikwall, Soldaten der Legion "Freies Indien".jpg|Sikh soldiers of the [[Indian Legion]] guarding the [[Atlantic Wall]] in France in March 1944. | |||
}} | |||
India's entry into the war was strongly opposed by [[Subhas Chandra Bose]]. Bose had been elected President of the Congress in 1938 and 1939 but later resigned owing to differences of opinion with Gandhi, however he remained emotionally attached to Congress for the remainder of his life. After his resignation he formed his own wing separated from the mainstream Congress leadership known as [[Forward bloc]] which was a ''loci'' focus for ex-congress leaders holding socialist views.<ref>{{harvnb|Bose|1985|p=}}</ref> Bose then founded the [[All India Forward Bloc]]. In 1940 the British authorities in Calcutta placed Bose under house arrest. However, he escaped and made his way through [[Afghanistan]] to [[Nazi Germany]] to seek [[Axis powers of World War II|Hitler and Mussolini's]] help for raising an army to fight the British. The [[Free India Legion]] comprising [[Erwin Rommel]]'s Indian [[POW]]s was formed. After a dramatic decline in Germany's military fortunes, a German land invasion of India became untenable. Hitler advised Bose to go to Japan where a submarine was arranged to transport Bose, who was ferried to Japanese Southeast Asia, where he formed the [[Azad Hind Government]]. The Provisional Free Indian Government in exile reorganised the [[Indian National Army]] composed of Indian POWs and volunteer Indian [[expatriates]] in South-East Asia, with the help of the Japanese. Its aim was to reach India as a fighting force that would build on public resentment to inspire revolt among Indian soldiers of the Raj. | |||
The INA was to see action against the Allies, including the [[British Indian Army]], in the forests of Arakan, [[Burma]], and in [[Assam]], laying [[Battle of Imphal|siege to Imphal and Kohima]] with the [[Japanese 15th Army]]. During the war, the [[Andaman and Nicobar]] islands [[Invasion and Occupation of the Andaman Islands during World War II|were captured by the Japanese]] and handed over by them to the INA. | |||
While a number of Japanese officers, even those like [[Iwaichi Fujiwara|Fujiwara]], who were devoted to the Indian cause, observed Bose as a military incompetent as well as an unrealistic and stubborn man who sees only his own needs and problems and could not observe the larger picture of the war as the Japanese had to.<ref>{{cite book|last=Gordon|first=Leonard A.|author-link=Leonard A. Gordon|title=Brothers Against the Raj: A Biography of Indian Nationalists Sarat and Subhas Chandra Bose|location=New York and Oxford|publisher=Columbia University Press|year=1990|isbn=0-231-07443-3|pages=517}}</ref> | |||
The INA failed owing to disrupted logistics, poor supplies from the Japanese, and lack of training.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mondediplo.com/2005/05/13wwiiasia |title=Forgotten armies of the East – Le Monde diplomatique – English edition |publisher=Mondediplo.com |date=10 May 2005 |access-date=14 June 2012}}</ref> The Azad Hind Fauj surrendered unconditionally to the British in Singapore in 1945. In the consensus of scholarly opinion, [[Death of Subhas Chandra Bose|Subhas Chandra Bose's death]] occurred from third-degree burns on 18 August 1945 after his overloaded Japanese plane crashed in Japanese-ruled Formosa (now Taiwan). | |||
Trials against members of the INA began in late 1945, and included the infamous joint court-martial of key figures [[Shah Nawaz Khan (general)|Shah Nawaz Khan]] and [[Prem Sahgal]]. | |||
[[Image:RIN HMIS Hindustan.jpg|thumb|250px|[[HMIS Hindustan (L80)|HMIS ''Hindustan'']] at Bombay Harbour after the war, was occupied by mutineers during the [[Royal Indian Navy Mutiny]].]] | [[Image:RIN HMIS Hindustan.jpg|thumb|250px|[[HMIS Hindustan (L80)|HMIS ''Hindustan'']] at Bombay Harbour after the war, was occupied by mutineers during the [[Royal Indian Navy Mutiny]].]] | ||
The [[Royal Indian Navy Mutiny]] was a failed insurrection which encompassed a [[strike action|total strike]] and subsequent [[mutiny]] by Indian sailors of the Royal Indian Navy on board ship and shore establishments at Bombay ([[Mumbai]]) harbour on 18 February 1946. From the initial flashpoint in Bombay, the mutiny spread and found support throughout [[British India]], from [[Karachi]] to [[Calcutta]] and ultimately came to involve 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 sailors.<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=-ipOZf7y_B4C Notes on India]'' By Robert Bohm.pp213</ref> | The [[Royal Indian Navy Mutiny]] was a failed insurrection which encompassed a [[strike action|total strike]] and subsequent [[mutiny]] by Indian sailors of the Royal Indian Navy on board ship and shore establishments at Bombay ([[Mumbai]]) harbour on 18 February 1946. From the initial flashpoint in Bombay, the mutiny spread and found support throughout [[British India]], from [[Karachi]] to [[Calcutta]] and ultimately came to involve 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 sailors.<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=-ipOZf7y_B4C Notes on India]'' By Robert Bohm.pp213</ref> | ||
Line 535: | Line 536: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* | * | ||
{{-}} | {{-}} |