Basic structure doctrine: Difference between revisions

m
robot, No dating maintenance tags modified.
(Added a new contribution to the collection.)
 
m (robot, No dating maintenance tags modified.)
 
Line 162: Line 162:
The basic structure doctrine was invoked by the [[Supreme Court of Judicature of Belize]] in ''[[Bowen v Attorney General]] BZ 2009 SC 2'' in rejecting the [[Belize Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Bill 2008]], which had sought to exclude certain deprivation of property rights from judicial review. The court recognised the fundamental rights granted by the constitution, respect for the rule of law and the right to the ownership of private property as basic features of the Belizean constitution, as well as the separation of powers, which [[Chief Justice of Belize|Chief Justice]] [[Abdulai Conteh]] noted had been recognised by the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]] in ''Hinds v The Queen [1977] AC 195'' (which was not a constitutional amendment case<ref name="BCBvAGBelize2011">{{cite web|title=British Caribbean Bank Ltd v AG Belize Claim No. 597 of 2011|publisher=[[Supreme Court of Judicature of Belize]]|url=https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7738.pdf|access-date=2020-11-22|url-status=live|archive-date=2020-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122015535/https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7738.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|41}}) as implicit in Westminster model constitutions in the Caribbean Commonwealth realm.<ref name="OBrien2013">{{cite web|last=O'Brien|first=Derek|title=Derek O'Brien: The Basic Structure Doctrine and the Courts of the Commonwealth Caribbean|url=https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/05/28/derek-obrien-the-basic-structure-doctrine-and-the-courts-of-the-commonwealth-caribbean/|publisher=UK Constitutional Law Association|work=UK Constitutional Law Blog|access-date=2020-11-22|archive-date=2020-10-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021101350/https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/05/28/derek-obrien-the-basic-structure-doctrine-and-the-courts-of-the-commonwealth-caribbean/|url-status=live}}</ref>
The basic structure doctrine was invoked by the [[Supreme Court of Judicature of Belize]] in ''[[Bowen v Attorney General]] BZ 2009 SC 2'' in rejecting the [[Belize Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Bill 2008]], which had sought to exclude certain deprivation of property rights from judicial review. The court recognised the fundamental rights granted by the constitution, respect for the rule of law and the right to the ownership of private property as basic features of the Belizean constitution, as well as the separation of powers, which [[Chief Justice of Belize|Chief Justice]] [[Abdulai Conteh]] noted had been recognised by the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]] in ''Hinds v The Queen [1977] AC 195'' (which was not a constitutional amendment case<ref name="BCBvAGBelize2011">{{cite web|title=British Caribbean Bank Ltd v AG Belize Claim No. 597 of 2011|publisher=[[Supreme Court of Judicature of Belize]]|url=https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7738.pdf|access-date=2020-11-22|url-status=live|archive-date=2020-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122015535/https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7738.pdf}}</ref>{{rp|41}}) as implicit in Westminster model constitutions in the Caribbean Commonwealth realm.<ref name="OBrien2013">{{cite web|last=O'Brien|first=Derek|title=Derek O'Brien: The Basic Structure Doctrine and the Courts of the Commonwealth Caribbean|url=https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/05/28/derek-obrien-the-basic-structure-doctrine-and-the-courts-of-the-commonwealth-caribbean/|publisher=UK Constitutional Law Association|work=UK Constitutional Law Blog|access-date=2020-11-22|archive-date=2020-10-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021101350/https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/05/28/derek-obrien-the-basic-structure-doctrine-and-the-courts-of-the-commonwealth-caribbean/|url-status=live}}</ref>


The Supreme Court affirmed the doctrine in ''[[British Caribbean Bank Ltd v AG Belize]] Claim No. 597 of 2011''<ref name="BCBvAGBelize2011"/> <ref name="">{{cite web|title=British Caribbean Bank Limited v. The Government of Belize PCA 2010-18|url=https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-british-caribbean-bank-ltd-v-the-government-of-belize-award-friday-19th-december-2014|publisher=[[Permanent Court of Arbitration]]|access-date=2020-11-22|archive-date=2020-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122030218/https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-british-caribbean-bank-ltd-v-the-government-of-belize-award-friday-19th-december-2014|url-status=live}}</ref> and struck down parts of the [[Belize Telecommunications (Amendment) Act 2011]] and [[Belize Constitution (Eighth) Amendment Act 2011]]. The amendments had sought to preclude the court from deciding on whether deprivation of property by the government was for a public purpose, and to remove any limits on the [[National Assembly (Belize)|National Assembly]]'s power to alter the constitution. This was found to impinge on the separation of powers, which had earlier been identified as part of the basic structure of the Belizean constitution.<ref name="OBrien2013"/>
The Supreme Court affirmed the doctrine in ''[[British Caribbean Bank Ltd v AG Belize]] Claim No. 597 of 2011''<ref name="BCBvAGBelize2011"/><ref>{{cite web|title=British Caribbean Bank Limited v. The Government of Belize PCA 2010-18|url=https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-british-caribbean-bank-ltd-v-the-government-of-belize-award-friday-19th-december-2014|publisher=[[Permanent Court of Arbitration]]|access-date=2020-11-22|archive-date=2020-11-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122030218/https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-british-caribbean-bank-ltd-v-the-government-of-belize-award-friday-19th-december-2014|url-status=live}}</ref> and struck down parts of the [[Belize Telecommunications (Amendment) Act 2011]] and [[Belize Constitution (Eighth) Amendment Act 2011]]. The amendments had sought to preclude the court from deciding on whether deprivation of property by the government was for a public purpose, and to remove any limits on the [[National Assembly (Belize)|National Assembly]]'s power to alter the constitution. This was found to impinge on the separation of powers, which had earlier been identified as part of the basic structure of the Belizean constitution.<ref name="OBrien2013"/>


===Malaysia===
===Malaysia===