1,326
edits
CleanupBot (talk | contribs) m (→top: robot: remove incorrect protection templates) |
(robot: Creating/updating articles) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|none}} | |||
{{short description| | {{pp-semi-indef|small=yes}} | ||
{{Use Indian English|date = March 2019}} | {{Use Indian English|date = March 2019}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date= | {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2022}} | ||
{{Infobox election | {{Infobox election | ||
| country = India | | country = India | ||
| type = parliamentary | | type = parliamentary | ||
Line 20: | Line 19: | ||
| 1blank = Alliance | | 1blank = Alliance | ||
| 2blank = Alliance seats | | 2blank = Alliance seats | ||
| image1 = | | image1 = File:Shri Narendra Modi.jpg | ||
| leader1 = | | leader1 = [[Narendra Modi]] | ||
| party1 = Bharatiya Janata Party | | party1 = Bharatiya Janata Party | ||
| alliance1 = National Democratic Alliance | |||
| leader_since1 = 13 September 2013 | | leader_since1 = 13 September 2013 | ||
| leaders_seat1 = [[Varanasi (Lok Sabha constituency)|Varanasi]] (''won'') | | leaders_seat1 = [[Varanasi (Lok Sabha constituency)|Varanasi]] (''won'') | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| percentage1 = '''37.36%''' | | percentage1 = '''37.36%''' | ||
| swing1 = '''{{increase}}6.36pp''' | | swing1 = '''{{increase}}6.36pp''' | ||
| image2 = Rahul Gandhi in Shillong (cropped).jpg | |||
| image2 = Rahul Gandhi ( | |||
| leader2 = [[Rahul Gandhi]] | | leader2 = [[Rahul Gandhi]] | ||
| leaders_seat2 = [[Wayanad | | leaders_seat2 = [[Wayanad Lok Sabha constituency|Wayanad]] (won) | ||
| party2 = Indian National Congress | | party2 = Indian National Congress | ||
| alliance2 = United Progressive Alliance | |||
| leader_since2 = 16 December 2017 | | leader_since2 = 16 December 2017 | ||
| last_election2 = 44 seats | | last_election2 = 44 seats | ||
Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
| percentage2 = 19.49% | | percentage2 = 19.49% | ||
| swing2 = {{increase}}0.18pp | | swing2 = {{increase}}0.18pp | ||
| map = [[File:Indian_General_Election_2019.svg|350px]] | | map = [[File:Indian_General_Election_2019.svg|350px]] | ||
| map_caption = Seat results by constituency. As this is a [[First-past-the-post voting|FPTP]] election, seat totals are not determined proportional to each party's total vote share, but instead by the plurality in each constituency. | | map_caption = Seat results by constituency. As this is a [[First-past-the-post voting|FPTP]] election, seat totals are not determined proportional to each party's total vote share, but instead by the plurality in each constituency. | ||
Line 54: | Line 51: | ||
| after_election = [[Narendra Modi]] | | after_election = [[Narendra Modi]] | ||
| after_party = Bharatiya Janata Party | | after_party = Bharatiya Janata Party | ||
| | | outgoing_members = List of members of the 16th Lok Sabha | ||
| elected_members = List of members of the 17th Lok Sabha | |||
| 2data1 = '''353''' | |||
| 2data2 = 91 | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''General elections''' were held in [[India]] in seven phases from 11 April to 19 May 2019 to elect the members of the [[17th Lok Sabha]]. Votes were counted and the result declared on 23 May.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ec-may-announce-lok-sabha-poll-schedule-in-march-first-week-sources/articleshow/67588495.cms|title=EC may announce Lok Sabha election schedule in March first week: Sources – Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=16 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405132838/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ec-may-announce-lok-sabha-poll-schedule-in-march-first-week-sources/articleshow/67588495.cms|archive-date=5 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://scroll.in/latest/915713/2019-general-elections-voting-to-be-held-in-seven-phases-to-start-on-april-11|title=2019 General Elections: Voting to be held in 7 phases from April 11 to May 19, counting on May 23|work=Scroll.in|language=en-US|access-date=10 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507042256/https://scroll.in/latest/915713/2019-general-elections-voting-to-be-held-in-seven-phases-to-start-on-april-11|archive-date=7 May 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.timesnownews.com/elections/blog/election-dates-2019-schedule-live-updates-lok-sabha-assembly-elections-arunachal-pradesh-andhra-pradesh-odisha-sikkim-jammu-and-kashmir-elections-date-india-elections-schedule-election-commission-model-code-of-conduct-2019-election-2019-dates-declared/184|title=Lok Sabha Election 2019 Dates Schedule LIVE, Assembly Elections Dates For Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, 2019 Election Date Time for Polling, Counting and Results|website=timesnownews.com|language=en-GB|access-date=10 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404003525/https://www.timesnownews.com/elections/blog/election-dates-2019-schedule-live-updates-lok-sabha-assembly-elections-arunachal-pradesh-andhra-pradesh-odisha-sikkim-jammu-and-kashmir-elections-date-india-elections-schedule-election-commission-model-code-of-conduct-2019-election-2019-dates-declared/184|archive-date=4 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/election-commission-lok-sabha-poll-dates.html|title=Lok Sabha elections will begin on April 11 and polling will be held over seven phases through May 19, followed by counting of votes on May 23. Lok Sabha Election 2019 : Key Dates, Live News Updates, Election Calendar.|website=english.manoramaonline.com|language=en-GB|access-date=13 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404003701/https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/election-commission-lok-sabha-poll-dates.html|archive-date=4 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Around 912 million people were eligible to vote, and voter turnout was over 67 percent – the highest ever, as well as the highest ever participation by women voters.<ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/at-67-1-2019-turnouts-a-record-election-commission/articleshow/69419715.cms At 67.1%, 2019 turnout's a record: Election Commission] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190521074334/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/at-67-1-2019-turnouts-a-record-election-commission/articleshow/69419715.cms |date=21 May 2019}}, The Times of India (20 May 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/world/asia/india-election-results.html Polls Are Closed in India's Election: What Happens Next?] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190519120903/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/world/asia/india-election-results.html |date=19 May 2019}}, ''[[The New York Times]]'', Douglas Schorzman and Kai Schultz (19 May 2019)</ref>{{efn|In 9 states and union territories of India – such as [[Arunachal Pradesh]], [[Kerala]] and [[Uttarakhand]] – more women turned out to vote than men in 2019.<ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/women-turn-out-in-greater-numbers-than-in-previous-elections/articleshow/69405687.cms Women turn out in greater numbers than in previous elections], ''The Economic Times'', Aanchal Bansal (20 May 2019)</ref>}} | '''General elections''' were held in [[India]] in seven phases from 11 April to 19 May 2019 to elect the members of the [[17th Lok Sabha]]. Votes were counted and the result was declared on 23 May.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ec-may-announce-lok-sabha-poll-schedule-in-march-first-week-sources/articleshow/67588495.cms|title=EC may announce Lok Sabha election schedule in March first week: Sources – Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=16 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405132838/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ec-may-announce-lok-sabha-poll-schedule-in-march-first-week-sources/articleshow/67588495.cms|archive-date=5 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://scroll.in/latest/915713/2019-general-elections-voting-to-be-held-in-seven-phases-to-start-on-april-11|title=2019 General Elections: Voting to be held in 7 phases from April 11 to May 19, counting on May 23|work=Scroll.in|language=en-US|access-date=10 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507042256/https://scroll.in/latest/915713/2019-general-elections-voting-to-be-held-in-seven-phases-to-start-on-april-11|archive-date=7 May 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.timesnownews.com/elections/blog/election-dates-2019-schedule-live-updates-lok-sabha-assembly-elections-arunachal-pradesh-andhra-pradesh-odisha-sikkim-jammu-and-kashmir-elections-date-india-elections-schedule-election-commission-model-code-of-conduct-2019-election-2019-dates-declared/184|title=Lok Sabha Election 2019 Dates Schedule LIVE, Assembly Elections Dates For Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, 2019 Election Date Time for Polling, Counting and Results|website=timesnownews.com|language=en-GB|access-date=10 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404003525/https://www.timesnownews.com/elections/blog/election-dates-2019-schedule-live-updates-lok-sabha-assembly-elections-arunachal-pradesh-andhra-pradesh-odisha-sikkim-jammu-and-kashmir-elections-date-india-elections-schedule-election-commission-model-code-of-conduct-2019-election-2019-dates-declared/184|archive-date=4 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/election-commission-lok-sabha-poll-dates.html|title=Lok Sabha elections will begin on April 11 and polling will be held over seven phases through May 19, followed by counting of votes on May 23. Lok Sabha Election 2019 : Key Dates, Live News Updates, Election Calendar.|website=english.manoramaonline.com|language=en-GB|access-date=13 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404003701/https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/election-commission-lok-sabha-poll-dates.html|archive-date=4 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Around 912 million people were eligible to vote, and voter turnout was over 67 percent – the highest ever, as well as the highest ever participation by women voters.<ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/at-67-1-2019-turnouts-a-record-election-commission/articleshow/69419715.cms At 67.1%, 2019 turnout's a record: Election Commission] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190521074334/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/at-67-1-2019-turnouts-a-record-election-commission/articleshow/69419715.cms |date=21 May 2019}}, The Times of India (20 May 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/world/asia/india-election-results.html Polls Are Closed in India's Election: What Happens Next?] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190519120903/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/world/asia/india-election-results.html |date=19 May 2019}}, ''[[The New York Times]]'', Douglas Schorzman and Kai Schultz (19 May 2019)</ref>{{efn|In 9 states and union territories of India – such as [[Arunachal Pradesh]], [[Kerala]] and [[Uttarakhand]] – more women turned out to vote than men in 2019.<ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/women-turn-out-in-greater-numbers-than-in-previous-elections/articleshow/69405687.cms Women turn out in greater numbers than in previous elections], ''The Economic Times'', Aanchal Bansal (20 May 2019)</ref>}} | ||
The [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] received 37.36% of the vote, the highest vote share by a political party since the [[1989 Indian general election|1989 general election]], and won 303 seats, further increasing its substantial majority.<ref>{{cite news |title=India Election Results: Modi and the B.J.P. Make History |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/world/asia/india-election-results.html |website=NYT |access-date=23 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190523031230/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/world/asia/india-election-results.html |archive-date=23 May 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> In addition, the BJP-led [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA) won 353 seats.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48389130|title=Modi thanks India for 'historic mandate'|date=23 May 2019|access-date=29 May 2019|language=en-GB|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190528223438/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48389130|archive-date=28 May 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Indian National Congress]] won 52 seats, failing to get 10% of the seats needed to claim the post of Leader of Opposition | The [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] received 37.36% of the vote, the highest vote share by a political party since the [[1989 Indian general election|1989 general election]], and won 303 seats, further increasing its substantial majority.<ref>{{cite news |title=India Election Results: Modi and the B.J.P. Make History |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/world/asia/india-election-results.html |website=NYT |access-date=23 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190523031230/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/world/asia/india-election-results.html |archive-date=23 May 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> In addition, the BJP-led [[National Democratic Alliance]] (NDA) won 353 seats.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48389130|title=Modi thanks India for 'historic mandate'|date=23 May 2019|access-date=29 May 2019|language=en-GB|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190528223438/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48389130|archive-date=28 May 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Indian National Congress]] won 52 seats, failing to get 10% of the seats needed to claim the post of [[Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha|Leader of the Opposition]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Narendra Modi government will not have Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha again |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/17th-lok-sabha-leader-of-opposition-bjp-congress-1533766-2019-05-24 |access-date=2023-01-17 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref> In addition, the Congress-led [[United Progressive Alliance]] (UPA) won 91 seats, while other parties won 98 seats.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Final numbers are in: 300 paar for PM Modi, Congress stuck at 52 |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/final-lok-sabha-election-results-nda-upa-others-modi-bjp-congress-1534175-2019-05-24 |access-date=2023-01-22 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref> | ||
[[Vidhan Sabha|Legislative assembly]] elections in the states of [[2019 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election|Andhra Pradesh]], [[2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election|Arunachal Pradesh]], [[2019 Odisha Legislative Assembly election|Odisha]] and [[2019 Sikkim Legislative Assembly election|Sikkim]] were held simultaneously with the general election,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/assembly-polls-lok-sabha-polls-jammu-and-kashmir.html|title=Assembly polls in 4 states with Lok Sabha elections but not in J&K- Malayala Manorama |website=english.manoramaonline.com |language=en-GB |access-date=11 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404003833/https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/assembly-polls-lok-sabha-polls-jammu-and-kashmir.html |archive-date=4 April 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.indiatvnews.com/elections/lok-sabha-elections-2019-lok-sabha-elections-2019-congress-mp-favours-more-seats-for-rjd-in-bihar-461365 |title=Lok Sabha elections 2019: Congress MP favours more seats for RJD in Bihar |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=29 September 2018 |language=en-US |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404044000/https://www.indiatvnews.com/elections/lok-sabha-elections-2019-lok-sabha-elections-2019-congress-mp-favours-more-seats-for-rjd-in-bihar-461365 |archive-date=4 April 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> as well as [[2019–20 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly by-election|by-elections]] | [[Vidhan Sabha|Legislative assembly]] elections in the states of [[2019 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election|Andhra Pradesh]], [[2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election|Arunachal Pradesh]], [[2019 Odisha Legislative Assembly election|Odisha]] and [[2019 Sikkim Legislative Assembly election|Sikkim]] were held simultaneously with the general election,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/assembly-polls-lok-sabha-polls-jammu-and-kashmir.html|title=Assembly polls in 4 states with Lok Sabha elections but not in J&K- Malayala Manorama |website=english.manoramaonline.com |language=en-GB |access-date=11 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404003833/https://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/lok-sabha-elections-2019/2019/03/10/assembly-polls-lok-sabha-polls-jammu-and-kashmir.html |archive-date=4 April 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.indiatvnews.com/elections/lok-sabha-elections-2019-lok-sabha-elections-2019-congress-mp-favours-more-seats-for-rjd-in-bihar-461365 |title=Lok Sabha elections 2019: Congress MP favours more seats for RJD in Bihar |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=29 September 2018 |language=en-US |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404044000/https://www.indiatvnews.com/elections/lok-sabha-elections-2019-lok-sabha-elections-2019-congress-mp-favours-more-seats-for-rjd-in-bihar-461365 |archive-date=4 April 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> as well as [[2019–20 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly by-election|by-elections]] of twenty-two seats of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.news18.com/news/politics/aiadmk-proves-it-mettle-in-tamil-nadu-maintains-hold-on-govt-after-winning-9-bypoll-seats-2157319.html |title=AIADMK Proves it Mettle in Tamil Nadu, Maintains Hold on Govt After Winning 9 Bypoll Seats |date=23 May 2019 |access-date=19 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708143002/https://www.news18.com/news/politics/aiadmk-proves-it-mettle-in-tamil-nadu-maintains-hold-on-govt-after-winning-9-bypoll-seats-2157319.html |archive-date=8 July 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
==Electoral system== | ==Electoral system== | ||
Line 518: | Line 518: | ||
According to the [[Pew Research Center]], a majority of Indian voters consider the lack of employment opportunities as a "very big problem" in their country. "About 18.6 million Indians were jobless and another 393.7 million work in poor-quality jobs vulnerable to displacement", stated the Pew report.<ref name="pewMarch252019a2" /> | According to the [[Pew Research Center]], a majority of Indian voters consider the lack of employment opportunities as a "very big problem" in their country. "About 18.6 million Indians were jobless and another 393.7 million work in poor-quality jobs vulnerable to displacement", stated the Pew report.<ref name="pewMarch252019a2" /> | ||
A report on unemployment prepared by the National Sample Survey Office's (NSSO's) periodic labour force survey, has not been officially released by the government. According to ''[[Business Today (India)|Business Today]]'', this report is the "first comprehensive survey on employment conducted by a government agency after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced demonetisation move in November 2016". According to this report, the 2017–2018 "usual status"{{efn|name=jobs}} unemployment rate in India is 6.1 per cent, which is a four-decade high.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/india-unemployment-rate-hits-four-decade-high-of-6-pct-in-2017-says-nsso-survey/story/315420.html|title=India's unemployment rate hit four-decade high of 6.1% in 2017–18, says NSSO survey|website=businesstoday.in|access-date=14 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327222013/https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/india-unemployment-rate-hits-four-decade-high-of-6-pct-in-2017-says-nsso-survey/story/315420.html|archive-date=27 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|name=jobs|The unemployment data in India is not collected on a monthly or an annual basis, rather it is determined through a sample survey once every 5 years, with a few exceptions. The survey methodology is unlike those in major world economies, and sub-classifies unemployment into categories such as "usual status unemployment" and "current status unemployment" based on the answers given by the individuals interviewed. Its methodology and results have been questioned by various scholars.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Employment and Unemployment Situation in 1990s: How Good Are NSS Data?|author=Indira Hirway|journal=Economic and Political Weekly|volume= 37|number= 21|year= 2002|pages= 2027–2036}}</ref><ref name=bhalla04132019/><ref>{{cite journal|title=Some Aspects of the Implementation of India's Employment Guarantee|author1=Yoshifumi Usami|author2=Vikas Rawal|journal=Review of Agrarian Studies|volume=2|number=2|year=2012|pages=74–93}}</ref> The report and the refusal of the BJP government to release it has been criticised by economist [[Surjit Bhalla]].<ref name=bhalla04132019>[https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/modi-government-opposition-congress-unemployment-jobs-data-statistical-embarrassment-5673325/ A Statistical Embarrassment] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416185254/https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/modi-government-opposition-congress-unemployment-jobs-data-statistical-embarrassment-5673325/ |date=16 April 2019 }}, Surjit Bhalla, The Indian Express (13 April 2019)</ref> According to Bhalla, the survey methodology is flawed and its results absurd, because the sample survey-based report finds that India's overall population has declined since 2011–12 by 1.2 per cent (contrary to the Census data which states a 6.7 per cent increase). The report finds that India's percent urbanisation and urban workforce has declined since 2012, which is contrary to all other studies on Indian urbanisation trends, states Bhalla.<ref name=bhalla04132019/> According to NSSO's report's data, "the Modi government has unleashed the most inclusive growth anywhere, and at any time in human history" – which is as unbelievable as the unemployment data it reports, states Bhalla.<ref name=bhalla04132019/> The NSSO report suggests the inflation-adjusted employment income of casual workers has dramatically increased while those of the salaried wage-earners has fallen during the 5-years of BJP government.<ref name=bhalla04132019/> The NSSO has also changed the sampling methodology in the latest round, state Bhalla and Avik Sarkar,<ref>[https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/unemployment-in-india-the-real-reason-behind-low-employment-numbers/1500640/ Unemployment in India: The real reason behind low employment numbers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190418003432/https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/unemployment-in-india-the-real-reason-behind-low-employment-numbers/1500640/ |date=18 April 2019 }}, Financial Express, Avik Sarkar (28 February 2019)</ref> which is one of the likely sources of its flawed statistics and conclusions.<ref name=bhalla04132019/>}} The government has claimed that the report was not final.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/jobs-data-not-finalised-government-after-nsso-report/articleshow/67782769.cms|title=Jobs data not finalised: Government after NSSO 'Report'|date=1 February 2019|work=The Economic Times|access-date=14 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327221821/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/jobs-data-not-finalised-government-after-nsso-report/articleshow/67782769.cms|archive-date=27 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> According to the [[International Labour Organization]] (ILO) – a United Nations agency, unemployment is rising in India and the "unemployment rate in the country [India] will stand at 3.5 percent in 2018 and 2019 – the same level of unemployment seen in 2017 and 2016", instead of dropping to 3.4 percent as it had previously projected.<ref name="ilojan20192">(a) [https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/more-joblessness-ilo-sees-india-s-unemployment-rate-rising-to-3-5-in-2018-118012300389_1.html More joblessness: ILO sees India's unemployment rate rising to 3.5% in 2018] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190414160724/https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/more-joblessness-ilo-sees-india-s-unemployment-rate-rising-to-3-5-in-2018-118012300389_1.html |date=14 April 2019 }}, Business Standard, Somesh Jha (24 January 2019); | A report on unemployment prepared by the National Sample Survey Office's (NSSO's) periodic labour force survey, has not been officially released by the government. According to ''[[Business Today (India)|Business Today]]'', this report is the "first comprehensive survey on employment conducted by a government agency after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced demonetisation move in November 2016". According to this report, the 2017–2018 "usual status"{{efn|name=jobs}} unemployment rate in India is 6.1 per cent, which is a four-decade high.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/india-unemployment-rate-hits-four-decade-high-of-6-pct-in-2017-says-nsso-survey/story/315420.html|title=India's unemployment rate hit four-decade high of 6.1% in 2017–18, says NSSO survey|website=businesstoday.in|date=31 January 2019 |access-date=14 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327222013/https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/india-unemployment-rate-hits-four-decade-high-of-6-pct-in-2017-says-nsso-survey/story/315420.html|archive-date=27 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|name=jobs|The unemployment data in India is not collected on a monthly or an annual basis, rather it is determined through a sample survey once every 5 years, with a few exceptions. The survey methodology is unlike those in major world economies, and sub-classifies unemployment into categories such as "usual status unemployment" and "current status unemployment" based on the answers given by the individuals interviewed. Its methodology and results have been questioned by various scholars.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Employment and Unemployment Situation in 1990s: How Good Are NSS Data?|author=Indira Hirway|journal=Economic and Political Weekly|volume= 37|number= 21|year= 2002|pages= 2027–2036}}</ref><ref name=bhalla04132019/><ref>{{cite journal|title=Some Aspects of the Implementation of India's Employment Guarantee|author1=Yoshifumi Usami|author2=Vikas Rawal|journal=Review of Agrarian Studies|volume=2|number=2|year=2012|pages=74–93}}</ref> The report and the refusal of the BJP government to release it has been criticised by economist [[Surjit Bhalla]].<ref name=bhalla04132019>[https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/modi-government-opposition-congress-unemployment-jobs-data-statistical-embarrassment-5673325/ A Statistical Embarrassment] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416185254/https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/modi-government-opposition-congress-unemployment-jobs-data-statistical-embarrassment-5673325/ |date=16 April 2019 }}, Surjit Bhalla, The Indian Express (13 April 2019)</ref> According to Bhalla, the survey methodology is flawed and its results absurd, because the sample survey-based report finds that India's overall population has declined since 2011–12 by 1.2 per cent (contrary to the Census data which states a 6.7 per cent increase). The report finds that India's percent urbanisation and urban workforce has declined since 2012, which is contrary to all other studies on Indian urbanisation trends, states Bhalla.<ref name=bhalla04132019/> According to NSSO's report's data, "the Modi government has unleashed the most inclusive growth anywhere, and at any time in human history" – which is as unbelievable as the unemployment data it reports, states Bhalla.<ref name=bhalla04132019/> The NSSO report suggests the inflation-adjusted employment income of casual workers has dramatically increased while those of the salaried wage-earners has fallen during the 5-years of BJP government.<ref name=bhalla04132019/> The NSSO has also changed the sampling methodology in the latest round, state Bhalla and Avik Sarkar,<ref>[https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/unemployment-in-india-the-real-reason-behind-low-employment-numbers/1500640/ Unemployment in India: The real reason behind low employment numbers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190418003432/https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/unemployment-in-india-the-real-reason-behind-low-employment-numbers/1500640/ |date=18 April 2019 }}, Financial Express, Avik Sarkar (28 February 2019)</ref> which is one of the likely sources of its flawed statistics and conclusions.<ref name=bhalla04132019/>}} The government has claimed that the report was not final.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/jobs-data-not-finalised-government-after-nsso-report/articleshow/67782769.cms|title=Jobs data not finalised: Government after NSSO 'Report'|date=1 February 2019|work=The Economic Times|access-date=14 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327221821/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/jobs-data-not-finalised-government-after-nsso-report/articleshow/67782769.cms|archive-date=27 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> According to the [[International Labour Organization]] (ILO) – a United Nations agency, unemployment is rising in India and the "unemployment rate in the country [India] will stand at 3.5 percent in 2018 and 2019 – the same level of unemployment seen in 2017 and 2016", instead of dropping to 3.4 percent as it had previously projected.<ref name="ilojan20192">(a) [https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/more-joblessness-ilo-sees-india-s-unemployment-rate-rising-to-3-5-in-2018-118012300389_1.html More joblessness: ILO sees India's unemployment rate rising to 3.5% in 2018] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190414160724/https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/more-joblessness-ilo-sees-india-s-unemployment-rate-rising-to-3-5-in-2018-118012300389_1.html |date=14 April 2019 }}, Business Standard, Somesh Jha (24 January 2019); | ||
(b) Full Report: World Employment Social Outlook Report, International Labour Organization (2019), {{isbn|978-92-2-132952-7}}, pages 108–109, Appendix D and Southern Asia section</ref> According to the ILO's World Employment Social Outlook Report, the unemployment rate in India has been in the 3.4 to 3.6 percent range over the UPA-government led 2009–2014 and the NDA-government led 2014–2019 periods.<ref name="ilojan20192" /> | (b) Full Report: World Employment Social Outlook Report, International Labour Organization (2019), {{isbn|978-92-2-132952-7}}, pages 108–109, Appendix D and Southern Asia section</ref> According to the ILO's World Employment Social Outlook Report, the unemployment rate in India has been in the 3.4 to 3.6 percent range over the UPA-government led 2009–2014 and the NDA-government led 2014–2019 periods.<ref name="ilojan20192" /> | ||
Line 534: | Line 534: | ||
The BJP highlighted that the Congress party has relied on [[Rahul Gandhi]] for leadership since 2013, its lack of internal party institutions and claimed that whenever Congress has been in power, the freedom of press and Indian government institutions have "taken a severe beating".<ref name="it032020192">[https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/honesty-over-dynasty-vikas-over-vote-bank-politics-pm-modi-presents-govts-report-card-asks-citizens-to-vote-wisely-1482365-2019-03-20 Honesty over dynasty, Vikas over vote-bank politics: PM Modi presents govt's report card, slams Congress] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113541/https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/honesty-over-dynasty-vikas-over-vote-bank-politics-pm-modi-presents-govts-report-card-asks-citizens-to-vote-wisely-1482365-2019-03-20 |date=19 April 2019 }}, India Today (20 March 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/prime-minister-narendra-modi-rahul-gandhi-congress-dynastic-politics-institutions-casualty-pm-modi-slams-congress-says-indias-institutions-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics/story/329451.html PM Modi slams Congress, says India's institutions biggest casualty of 'dynastic politics'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113538/https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/prime-minister-narendra-modi-rahul-gandhi-congress-dynastic-politics-institutions-casualty-pm-modi-slams-congress-says-indias-institutions-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics/story/329451.html |date=19 April 2019 }}, Business Today (20 March 2019)</ref> During the election campaign, its leaders mentioned the Emergency of 1975, the nepotism, corruption and widespread abuses of human rights under the Congress rule in the past.<ref name="it032020192" /><ref>[https://www.asianage.com/india/politics/200319/indias-institutions-have-been-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics-pm-attacks-cong.html India's institutions biggest casualty of dynasty politics: PM attacks Congress] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113539/https://www.asianage.com/india/politics/200319/indias-institutions-have-been-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics-pm-attacks-cong.html |date=19 April 2019 }}, The Asian Age (20 March 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/rahul-priyanka-turned-mahatma-gandhi-s-fear-of-dynasty-politics-into-reality-adityanath-119040800621_1.html Rahul, Priyanka turned Mahatma Gandhi's fear of dynasty politics into reality: Adityanath] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113541/https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/rahul-priyanka-turned-mahatma-gandhi-s-fear-of-dynasty-politics-into-reality-adityanath-119040800621_1.html |date=19 April 2019 }}, Business Standard, ANI (8 April 2019)</ref> Congress-led alliance leader [[H. D. Kumaraswamy]] – the son of a former prime minister of India and the former chief minister of Karnataka, countered that "India developed because of dynasty politics", stating that "dynasty politics are not the main issue, rather country's problems are".<ref>[https://www.hindustantimes.com/lok-sabha-elections/india-developed-because-of-dynasty-politics-kumaraswamy-counters-bjp/story-77HK1ydSqXtKzkYDB3nY2I.html ‘India developed because of dynasty politics’: Kumaraswamy counters BJP] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190418070055/https://www.hindustantimes.com/lok-sabha-elections/india-developed-because-of-dynasty-politics-kumaraswamy-counters-bjp/story-77HK1ydSqXtKzkYDB3nY2I.html |date=18 April 2019 }}, The Hindustan Times (18 April 2019)</ref> The Congress alleged hypocrisy by the BJP, claiming that the BJP itself forms alliances with dynasty-based parties such as the [[Shiromani Akali Dal|Akali Dal]] in Punjab, and that family relatives of senior BJP leaders such as [[Rajnath Singh]] and [[Arun Jaitley]] have been in politics too.<ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-raking-up-dynasty-politics-to-divert-attention-from-real-issues-congress/articleshow/68551735.cms BJP raking up ‘dynasty politics’ to divert attention from real issues: Congress] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404190341/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-raking-up-dynasty-politics-to-divert-attention-from-real-issues-congress/articleshow/68551735.cms |date=4 April 2019 }}, The Times of India (24 March 2019)</ref> | The BJP highlighted that the Congress party has relied on [[Rahul Gandhi]] for leadership since 2013, its lack of internal party institutions and claimed that whenever Congress has been in power, the freedom of press and Indian government institutions have "taken a severe beating".<ref name="it032020192">[https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/honesty-over-dynasty-vikas-over-vote-bank-politics-pm-modi-presents-govts-report-card-asks-citizens-to-vote-wisely-1482365-2019-03-20 Honesty over dynasty, Vikas over vote-bank politics: PM Modi presents govt's report card, slams Congress] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113541/https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/honesty-over-dynasty-vikas-over-vote-bank-politics-pm-modi-presents-govts-report-card-asks-citizens-to-vote-wisely-1482365-2019-03-20 |date=19 April 2019 }}, India Today (20 March 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/prime-minister-narendra-modi-rahul-gandhi-congress-dynastic-politics-institutions-casualty-pm-modi-slams-congress-says-indias-institutions-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics/story/329451.html PM Modi slams Congress, says India's institutions biggest casualty of 'dynastic politics'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113538/https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/prime-minister-narendra-modi-rahul-gandhi-congress-dynastic-politics-institutions-casualty-pm-modi-slams-congress-says-indias-institutions-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics/story/329451.html |date=19 April 2019 }}, Business Today (20 March 2019)</ref> During the election campaign, its leaders mentioned the Emergency of 1975, the nepotism, corruption and widespread abuses of human rights under the Congress rule in the past.<ref name="it032020192" /><ref>[https://www.asianage.com/india/politics/200319/indias-institutions-have-been-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics-pm-attacks-cong.html India's institutions biggest casualty of dynasty politics: PM attacks Congress] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113539/https://www.asianage.com/india/politics/200319/indias-institutions-have-been-biggest-casualty-of-dynastic-politics-pm-attacks-cong.html |date=19 April 2019 }}, The Asian Age (20 March 2019)</ref><ref>[https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/rahul-priyanka-turned-mahatma-gandhi-s-fear-of-dynasty-politics-into-reality-adityanath-119040800621_1.html Rahul, Priyanka turned Mahatma Gandhi's fear of dynasty politics into reality: Adityanath] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190419113541/https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/rahul-priyanka-turned-mahatma-gandhi-s-fear-of-dynasty-politics-into-reality-adityanath-119040800621_1.html |date=19 April 2019 }}, Business Standard, ANI (8 April 2019)</ref> Congress-led alliance leader [[H. D. Kumaraswamy]] – the son of a former prime minister of India and the former chief minister of Karnataka, countered that "India developed because of dynasty politics", stating that "dynasty politics are not the main issue, rather country's problems are".<ref>[https://www.hindustantimes.com/lok-sabha-elections/india-developed-because-of-dynasty-politics-kumaraswamy-counters-bjp/story-77HK1ydSqXtKzkYDB3nY2I.html ‘India developed because of dynasty politics’: Kumaraswamy counters BJP] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190418070055/https://www.hindustantimes.com/lok-sabha-elections/india-developed-because-of-dynasty-politics-kumaraswamy-counters-bjp/story-77HK1ydSqXtKzkYDB3nY2I.html |date=18 April 2019 }}, The Hindustan Times (18 April 2019)</ref> The Congress alleged hypocrisy by the BJP, claiming that the BJP itself forms alliances with dynasty-based parties such as the [[Shiromani Akali Dal|Akali Dal]] in Punjab, and that family relatives of senior BJP leaders such as [[Rajnath Singh]] and [[Arun Jaitley]] have been in politics too.<ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-raking-up-dynasty-politics-to-divert-attention-from-real-issues-congress/articleshow/68551735.cms BJP raking up ‘dynasty politics’ to divert attention from real issues: Congress] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404190341/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-raking-up-dynasty-politics-to-divert-attention-from-real-issues-congress/articleshow/68551735.cms |date=4 April 2019 }}, The Times of India (24 March 2019)</ref> | ||
According to an IndiaSpend report published by the BloombergQuint, the smaller and regional parties such as the Jammu and Kashmir National Conference, Lok Jan Sakti Party, Shiromani Akali Dal, Biju Janata Dal and Samajwadi Party have higher densities of dynasty-derived candidates and elected representatives in recent years.<ref name="bq032920192">{{cite news|url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/elections/bjp-is-no-less-dynastic-than-congress-lok-sabha-data-indicates|title=BJP Is No Less 'Dynastic' Than Congress, Lok Sabha Data Indicates|last1=Sanghera|first1=Tisha|date=2019|publisher=BloombergQuint|agency=BloombergQuint|issue=29 March|access-date=26 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190426160247/https://www.bloombergquint.com/elections/bjp-is-no-less-dynastic-than-congress-lok-sabha-data-indicates|archive-date=26 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[https://www.business-standard.com/article/elections/data-shows-up-india-s-largest-state-elected-most-dynasts-majority-in-bjp-119032900159_1.html Data shows UP, India's largest state, elected most dynasts, majority in BJP] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190427001219/https://www.business-standard.com/article/elections/data-shows-up-india-s-largest-state-elected-most-dynasts-majority-in-bjp-119032900159_1.html |date=27 April 2019 }}, Tish Sanghera, IndiaSpend, Business Standard (7 April 2019)</ref> While both the Congress and the BJP have also nominated candidates from political dynasties, states the report, the difference between them is that in Congress "top party leadership has been handed down from generation to generation within the same [Nehru Gandhi dynasty] family", while there has been a historic non-dynastic diversity in the top leadership within the BJP. According to the report, while BJP has also nominated candidates from political dynasties, its better public relations operation "can leap to its defence when attacked on the same grounds".<ref name="bq032920192" /> In contrast to the IndiaSpend report, analysis of Kanchan Chandra, a prominent professor of Politics, of the 2004, 2009 and 2014 general elections included a finding that the Congress party has had about twice or more dynastic parliamentarians than the BJP at those elections, and higher than all major political parties in India except the Samajwadi Party.<ref name="Chandra2016p152">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VwbFDAAAQBAJ|title=Democratic Dynasties: State, Party, and Family in Contemporary Indian Politics|author=Kanchan Chandra|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2016|isbn=978-1-316-59212-0|pages=15–18}}</ref>{{efn|According to Chandra: in 2009 after the persistently dynastic Samajwadi party, the larger Biju Janata Dal ranked next, followed by the Congress party. In 2004 and 2014, Congress ranked second.<ref name="Chandra2016p15"/>}} Many of these dynastic politicians in India who inherit the leadership positions have never held any jobs and lack state or local experience, states Anjali Bohlken – a professor and political science scholar, and this raises concerns of rampant nepotism and appointments of their own friends, relatives and cronies if elected.<ref name=Chandra2016p15>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VwbFDAAAQBAJ|title=Democratic Dynasties: State, Party, and Family in Contemporary Indian Politics|author=Anjali Bohlken|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2016|isbn=978-1-316-59212-0|editor=Kanchan Chandra|pages=240–247, 44, 114–115 (Adam Ziegfeld Chapter)}}</ref> The BJP has targeted the Congress party in the 2019 elections for alleged nepotism and a family dynasty for leadership.<ref name="it032020192" /><ref name="bq032920192" /> | According to an IndiaSpend report published by the BloombergQuint, the smaller and regional parties such as the Jammu and Kashmir National Conference, Lok Jan Sakti Party, Shiromani Akali Dal, Biju Janata Dal and Samajwadi Party have higher densities of dynasty-derived candidates and elected representatives in recent years.<ref name="bq032920192">{{cite news|url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/elections/bjp-is-no-less-dynastic-than-congress-lok-sabha-data-indicates|title=BJP Is No Less 'Dynastic' Than Congress, Lok Sabha Data Indicates|last1=Sanghera|first1=Tisha|date=2019|publisher=BloombergQuint|agency=BloombergQuint|issue=29 March|access-date=26 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190426160247/https://www.bloombergquint.com/elections/bjp-is-no-less-dynastic-than-congress-lok-sabha-data-indicates|archive-date=26 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[https://www.business-standard.com/article/elections/data-shows-up-india-s-largest-state-elected-most-dynasts-majority-in-bjp-119032900159_1.html Data shows UP, India's largest state, elected most dynasts, majority in BJP] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190427001219/https://www.business-standard.com/article/elections/data-shows-up-india-s-largest-state-elected-most-dynasts-majority-in-bjp-119032900159_1.html |date=27 April 2019 }}, Tish Sanghera, IndiaSpend, Business Standard (7 April 2019)</ref> While both the Congress and the BJP have also nominated candidates from political dynasties, states the report, the difference between them is that in Congress "top party leadership has been handed down from generation to generation within the same [Nehru Gandhi dynasty] family", while there has been a historic non-dynastic diversity in the top leadership within the BJP. According to the report, while BJP has also nominated candidates from political dynasties, its better public relations operation "can leap to its defence when attacked on the same grounds".<ref name="bq032920192" /> In contrast to the IndiaSpend report, analysis of [[Kanchan Chandra]], a prominent professor of Politics, of the 2004, 2009 and 2014 general elections included a finding that the Congress party has had about twice or more dynastic parliamentarians than the BJP at those elections, and higher than all major political parties in India except the Samajwadi Party.<ref name="Chandra2016p152">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VwbFDAAAQBAJ|title=Democratic Dynasties: State, Party, and Family in Contemporary Indian Politics|author=Kanchan Chandra|author-link=Kanchan Chandra|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2016|isbn=978-1-316-59212-0|pages=15–18}}</ref>{{efn|According to Chandra: in 2009 after the persistently dynastic Samajwadi party, the larger Biju Janata Dal ranked next, followed by the Congress party. In 2004 and 2014, Congress ranked second.<ref name="Chandra2016p15"/>}} Many of these dynastic politicians in India who inherit the leadership positions have never held any jobs and lack state or local experience, states Anjali Bohlken – a professor and political science scholar, and this raises concerns of rampant nepotism and appointments of their own friends, relatives and cronies if elected.<ref name=Chandra2016p15>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VwbFDAAAQBAJ|title=Democratic Dynasties: State, Party, and Family in Contemporary Indian Politics|author=Anjali Bohlken|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2016|isbn=978-1-316-59212-0|editor=Kanchan Chandra|pages=240–247, 44, 114–115 (Adam Ziegfeld Chapter)}}</ref> The BJP has targeted the Congress party in the 2019 elections for alleged nepotism and a family dynasty for leadership.<ref name="it032020192" /><ref name="bq032920192" /> | ||
===Campaign controversies=== | ===Campaign controversies=== | ||
Line 577: | Line 577: | ||
====Highlights of the BJP manifesto==== | ====Highlights of the BJP manifesto==== | ||
The BJP released its manifesto sub-titled ''Sankalpit Bharat, Sashakt Bharat'' (''lit.'' "Resolute India, Empowered India") on 8 April.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/prime-minister-narendra-modi-amit-shah-to-launch-bjp-manifesto-sankalp-patra-today-2019503|title=PM Modi, Amit Shah Launch BJP Manifesto Sankalp Patra|date=8 April 2019|work=NDTV.com|access-date=8 April 2019|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190408062308/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/prime-minister-narendra-modi-amit-shah-to-launch-bjp-manifesto-sankalp-patra-today-2019503|archive-date=8 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="bjpApril820192">{{cite web|url=https://www.bjp.org/ | The BJP released its manifesto sub-titled ''Sankalpit Bharat, Sashakt Bharat'' (''lit.'' "Resolute India, Empowered India") on 8 April.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/prime-minister-narendra-modi-amit-shah-to-launch-bjp-manifesto-sankalp-patra-today-2019503|title=PM Modi, Amit Shah Launch BJP Manifesto Sankalp Patra|date=8 April 2019|work=NDTV.com|access-date=8 April 2019|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190408062308/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/prime-minister-narendra-modi-amit-shah-to-launch-bjp-manifesto-sankalp-patra-today-2019503|archive-date=8 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="bjpApril820192">{{cite web|url=https://www.bjp.org/manifesto2019|title=BJP Manifesto 2019|access-date=12 June 2022}}</ref> Some of its highlights:<ref name="itApril82019a2" /><ref name="bjpApril820192" /><ref>[https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/bjps-sankalp-patra-makes-75-resolutions-for-india/articleshow/68775256.cms BJP manifesto highlights: The 75 promises for India] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422004005/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/bjps-sankalp-patra-makes-75-resolutions-for-india/articleshow/68775256.cms |date=22 April 2019 }}, The Economic Times (8 April 2019)</ref> | ||
* Implementation of a nationwide [[National Register of Citizens of India|NRC]] exercise<ref name="Wire 21 Dec CAA">{{cite news |title=As Anti-CAA Pressure Builds, BJP Govt Goes Discernibly on the Backfoot |date=21 December 2019 |work=The Wire |url=https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-anti-caa-nrc |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221231703/https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-anti-caa-nrc |archive-date=21 December 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> to identify & deport [[Illegal immigration to India|undocumented immigrants]], an immigrant being defined in this context as a person who is unable to provide documentary evidence of his/her residency in India prior to 26 March 1971 or that of his/her immediate ancestors (parents & grandparents) in case of being born after the previously-mentioned date, preceded by an [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019|amendment in citizenship laws]] that will allow only undocumented Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi & Christian immigrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh & Afghanistan who entered India before 31 December 2014 to automatically obtain Indian citizenship.<ref name=bjplsmanifesto>[https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5798075-Bjp-Election-2019-Manifesto-English.html Sankalpit Bharat Sashakt Bharat] {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110060600/https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5798075-Bjp-Election-2019-Manifesto-English.html |date=10 November 2019 }}, BJP Sankalp Patra Lok Sabha 2019 (Manifesto, 2019)</ref><ref name="ITEndorsement">{{cite news |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/citizenship-amendment-bill-has-public-endorsement-was-part-of-manifesto-amit-shah-1626765-2019-12-09 |title=Citizenship Amendment Bill has public endorsement, was part of manifesto: Amit Shah |last1=Kaur Sandhu |first1=Kamaljit |date=9 December 2019 |first2=Mausami |last2=Singh |newspaper=India Today |quote=The Citizenship Amendment Bill ... was required to give protection to people who are forced to live in pathetic human condition due to their religious affiliation while rejecting the argument that a Muslim can also face religious persecution in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan saying that a Muslim is unlikely to face religious persecution in a country where Islam is the state religion}}</ref> | |||
* [[Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir|End special status and special rights to natives of by abrogating Article 370 and Article 35A of the Constitution of India]].<ref name="itApril82019a2" /> | |||
* Double farmer incomes by 2022 by completing all major and micro-irrigation infrastructure projects, opening adequate markets and modern farm produce storage centres, implement minimum price supports for farmer produce, farmer loans and all-weather rural roads. Introduce a pension bill for small and marginal farmers to provide social security after 60 years of age. | * Double farmer incomes by 2022 by completing all major and micro-irrigation infrastructure projects, opening adequate markets and modern farm produce storage centres, implement minimum price supports for farmer produce, farmer loans and all-weather rural roads. Introduce a pension bill for small and marginal farmers to provide social security after 60 years of age. | ||
* Bring all secondary schools under the national board quality purview. Invest {{INRConvert|100000|c}} in higher education, open new and increase seats at existing engineering, management and law schools. Establish skills and innovations centre at block-level in every town. Enhance higher education opportunities for women by introducing financial support and subsidies programs. Source 10 percent of government procurement from companies with more than 50 percent female employees. | * Bring all secondary schools under the national board quality purview. Invest {{INRConvert|100000|c}} in higher education, open new and increase seats at existing engineering, management and law schools. Establish skills and innovations centre at block-level in every town. Enhance higher education opportunities for women by introducing financial support and subsidies programs. Source 10 percent of government procurement from companies with more than 50 percent female employees. | ||
Line 591: | Line 593: | ||
* Privatisation of defence, space and agriculture sector for development of India. | * Privatisation of defence, space and agriculture sector for development of India. | ||
* Zero tolerance for terrorism, fund resources to strengthen national security, guarantee veterans, and soldier welfare, modernise police forces. | * Zero tolerance for terrorism, fund resources to strengthen national security, guarantee veterans, and soldier welfare, modernise police forces. | ||
====Other parties==== | ====Other parties==== | ||
Line 610: | Line 611: | ||
The electoral bonds in denominations ranging from 1,000 rupees to 10 million rupees ($14 to $140,000) can be purchased and donated to a political party. The bonds don't carry the name of the donor and are exempt from tax.<ref name="bb031620192">{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-india-election-funds/|title=A Murky Flood of Money Pours Into the World's Largest Election|last1=Jeanette Rodrigues, Archana Chaudhary and Hannah Dormido|access-date=22 April 2019|agency=Bloomberg|issue=16 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422173143/https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-india-election-funds/|archive-date=22 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|Stanley Kochanek in 1987 published about the "briefcase politics" tradition in Indian politics during the decades when the Congress party dominated Indian national politics.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Briefcase Politics in India: The Congress Party and the Business Elite|author=Stanley A. Kochanek| journal=Asian Survey | volume= 27| number= 12| year= 1987| pages= 1278–1301|publisher= University of California Press|jstor=2644635|doi=10.2307/2644635}}</ref> Similarly, Rajeev Gowda and E Sridharan in 2012 have discussed the history of campaign financing laws in India and the role of black money in Indian elections.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Gowda | first1=M. V. Rajeev | last2=Sridharan | first2=E. | s2cid=38948261 | title=Reforming India's Party Financing and Election Expenditure Laws | journal=Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy | volume=11 | issue=2 | year=2012 | doi=10.1089/elj.2011.0131 | pages=226–240}}</ref> Devesh Kapur and Milan Vaishnav discuss the rise of "briefcase" black money donations in India triggered by the 1969 campaign financing bans proposed and enacted by Indira Gandhi, and the campaign finance law reforms thereafter through 2017. They call the recent reforms as yielding "greater transparency than ever before, though limited".<ref>{{cite book|author1=Devesh Kapur|author2=Milan Vaishnav|title=Costs of Democracy: Political Finance in India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EzxsDwAAQBAJ |year=2018|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-909313-7|pages=1–17, Chapter 1}}</ref>}} Factly – an India data journalism portal, traced the electoral bond donations for 2018 under India's Right to Information Act. According to Factly, electoral bonds worth about {{INRConvert|10600000000}} were purchased and donated in 2018. According to Bloomberg, this accounted for 31.2 percent of political donations in 2018, while 51.4 percent of the total donated amount were each below {{INRConvert|20000}} and these too were from unknown donors. About 47 percent of the donations to political parties were from known sources.<ref name="bb031620192" /> Between 1 January and 31 March 2019, donors bought {{INRConvert|17100000000}} worth of electoral bonds and donated.<ref>[https://www.ft.com/content/28c89610-503c-11e9-b401-8d9ef1626294 Indian election finance rules spark calls for greater transparency] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422192323/https://www.ft.com/content/28c89610-503c-11e9-b401-8d9ef1626294 |date=22 April 2019 }}, The Financial Times (3 April 2019)</ref> The spending in elections boosts national GDP, and the 2009 election spending contributed about 0.5 percent to GDP.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Devesh Kapur and Milan Vaishnav|year=2011|title=Quid Pro Quo: Builders, Politicians, and Election Finance in India|publisher=Center for Global Development Washington DC, University of Pennsylvania}}</ref> | The electoral bonds in denominations ranging from 1,000 rupees to 10 million rupees ($14 to $140,000) can be purchased and donated to a political party. The bonds don't carry the name of the donor and are exempt from tax.<ref name="bb031620192">{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-india-election-funds/|title=A Murky Flood of Money Pours Into the World's Largest Election|last1=Jeanette Rodrigues, Archana Chaudhary and Hannah Dormido|access-date=22 April 2019|agency=Bloomberg|issue=16 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422173143/https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-india-election-funds/|archive-date=22 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>{{efn|Stanley Kochanek in 1987 published about the "briefcase politics" tradition in Indian politics during the decades when the Congress party dominated Indian national politics.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Briefcase Politics in India: The Congress Party and the Business Elite|author=Stanley A. Kochanek| journal=Asian Survey | volume= 27| number= 12| year= 1987| pages= 1278–1301|publisher= University of California Press|jstor=2644635|doi=10.2307/2644635}}</ref> Similarly, Rajeev Gowda and E Sridharan in 2012 have discussed the history of campaign financing laws in India and the role of black money in Indian elections.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Gowda | first1=M. V. Rajeev | last2=Sridharan | first2=E. | s2cid=38948261 | title=Reforming India's Party Financing and Election Expenditure Laws | journal=Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy | volume=11 | issue=2 | year=2012 | doi=10.1089/elj.2011.0131 | pages=226–240}}</ref> Devesh Kapur and Milan Vaishnav discuss the rise of "briefcase" black money donations in India triggered by the 1969 campaign financing bans proposed and enacted by Indira Gandhi, and the campaign finance law reforms thereafter through 2017. They call the recent reforms as yielding "greater transparency than ever before, though limited".<ref>{{cite book|author1=Devesh Kapur|author2=Milan Vaishnav|title=Costs of Democracy: Political Finance in India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EzxsDwAAQBAJ |year=2018|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-909313-7|pages=1–17, Chapter 1}}</ref>}} Factly – an India data journalism portal, traced the electoral bond donations for 2018 under India's Right to Information Act. According to Factly, electoral bonds worth about {{INRConvert|10600000000}} were purchased and donated in 2018. According to Bloomberg, this accounted for 31.2 percent of political donations in 2018, while 51.4 percent of the total donated amount were each below {{INRConvert|20000}} and these too were from unknown donors. About 47 percent of the donations to political parties were from known sources.<ref name="bb031620192" /> Between 1 January and 31 March 2019, donors bought {{INRConvert|17100000000}} worth of electoral bonds and donated.<ref>[https://www.ft.com/content/28c89610-503c-11e9-b401-8d9ef1626294 Indian election finance rules spark calls for greater transparency] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422192323/https://www.ft.com/content/28c89610-503c-11e9-b401-8d9ef1626294 |date=22 April 2019 }}, The Financial Times (3 April 2019)</ref> The spending in elections boosts national GDP, and the 2009 election spending contributed about 0.5 percent to GDP.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Devesh Kapur and Milan Vaishnav|year=2011|title=Quid Pro Quo: Builders, Politicians, and Election Finance in India|publisher=Center for Global Development Washington DC, University of Pennsylvania}}</ref> | ||
According to Centre for Media Studies, the BJP spent over Rs 280 billion (or 45%) of the Rs 600 billion spent by all political parties during the polls.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://cmsindia.org/cms-poll/Poll-Expenditure-the-2019-elections-cms-report.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=8 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190608095617/http://cmsindia.org/cms-poll/Poll-Expenditure-the-2019-elections-cms-report.pdf |archive-date=8 June 2019 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Congress questions BJP over its poll expenditure <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/jun/07/was-it-black-money-congress-questions-bjps-rs-28000-crore-poll-expenditure-1987218.html|title=Was it black money? Congress questions BJP's Rs 28,000 crore poll expenditure|website=The New Indian Express|access-date=8 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190608095611/http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/jun/07/was-it-black-money-congress-questions-bjps-rs-28000-crore-poll-expenditure-1987218.html|archive-date=8 June 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | According to Centre for Media Studies, the BJP spent over Rs 280 billion (or 45%) of the Rs 600 billion spent by all political parties during the polls.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://cmsindia.org/cms-poll/Poll-Expenditure-the-2019-elections-cms-report.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=8 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190608095617/http://cmsindia.org/cms-poll/Poll-Expenditure-the-2019-elections-cms-report.pdf |archive-date=8 June 2019 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Congress questions BJP over its poll expenditure<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/jun/07/was-it-black-money-congress-questions-bjps-rs-28000-crore-poll-expenditure-1987218.html|title=Was it black money? Congress questions BJP's Rs 28,000 crore poll expenditure|website=The New Indian Express|access-date=8 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190608095611/http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/jun/07/was-it-black-money-congress-questions-bjps-rs-28000-crore-poll-expenditure-1987218.html|archive-date=8 June 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
== Parties and alliances == | == Parties and alliances == | ||
=== Political alliances === | === Political alliances === | ||
{{ | {{Main article|National Democratic Alliance|United Progressive Alliance|Communism in India}} | ||
With the exception of 2014, no single party has won the majority of seats in the Lok Sabha since 1984, and therefore, forming alliances is the norm in Indian elections. | With the exception of 2014, no single party has won the majority of seats in the Lok Sabha since 1984, and therefore, forming alliances is the norm in Indian elections. | ||
There were | There were three main national pre-poll alliances. They are the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) headed by the BJP, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) headed by the INC and the [[Communism in India#Alliances|Left Front]] of the communist leaning parties. Given the volatile nature of coalition politics in India, alliances may change during and after the election. | ||
The INC did not form alliances in states where it is in direct contest with the BJP. These states include Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh. It formed alliances with regional parties in Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Jharkhand, and Kerala.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/indian-general-election-2019-why-congress-has-no-alliance-partners-in-these-states/articleshow/68738378.cms|title=General election 2019: Why Congress has no alliance partners in these states|last1=Kumar Shakti Shekhar|date=2019|access-date=16 April 2019|newspaper=Times of India|issue=5 April|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190407165130/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/indian-general-election-2019-why-congress-has-no-alliance-partners-in-these-states/articleshow/68738378.cms|archive-date=7 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | The INC did not form alliances in states where it is in direct contest with the BJP. These states include Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh. It formed alliances with regional parties in Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Jharkhand, and Kerala.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/indian-general-election-2019-why-congress-has-no-alliance-partners-in-these-states/articleshow/68738378.cms|title=General election 2019: Why Congress has no alliance partners in these states|last1=Kumar Shakti Shekhar|date=2019|access-date=16 April 2019|newspaper=Times of India|issue=5 April|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190407165130/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/indian-general-election-2019-why-congress-has-no-alliance-partners-in-these-states/articleshow/68738378.cms|archive-date=7 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
The left parties, most notably the [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)]] contested mostly on its own in its strongholds [[West Bengal]], [[Tripura]] and [[Kerala]], confronting both NDA and UPA. In Tamil Nadu, it was part of [[Secular Progressive Alliance]] led by [[Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam|DMK]] and allied with [[Jana Sena Party]] in Andhra Pradesh.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://cpim.org/documents/review-17th-lok-sabha-elections| title = Review of the 17th Lok Sabha Elections}}</ref> | |||
In January 2019, [[Bahujan Samaj Party]] and [[Samajwadi Party]] announced a grand alliance (''[[Mahagathbandhan (2019)|Mahagathbandhan]]'') to contest 76 out of the 80 seats in [[Uttar Pradesh]] leaving two seats, namely [[Amethi]] and [[Rae Bareli]], for INC and another two for other political parties.<ref name="auto2">{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sp-bsp-announce-tie-up-for-lok-sabha-polls-to-contest-38-seats-each-in-up/articleshow/67499467.cms|title=SP, BSP announce tie-up for Lok Sabha polls, to contest 38 seats each in UP – Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=12 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190112201709/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sp-bsp-announce-tie-up-for-lok-sabha-polls-to-contest-38-seats-each-in-up/articleshow/67499467.cms|archive-date=12 January 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | In January 2019, [[Bahujan Samaj Party]] and [[Samajwadi Party]] announced a grand alliance (''[[Mahagathbandhan (2019)|Mahagathbandhan]]'') to contest 76 out of the 80 seats in [[Uttar Pradesh]] leaving two seats, namely [[Amethi]] and [[Rae Bareli]], for INC and another two for other political parties.<ref name="auto2">{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sp-bsp-announce-tie-up-for-lok-sabha-polls-to-contest-38-seats-each-in-up/articleshow/67499467.cms|title=SP, BSP announce tie-up for Lok Sabha polls, to contest 38 seats each in UP – Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=12 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190112201709/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sp-bsp-announce-tie-up-for-lok-sabha-polls-to-contest-38-seats-each-in-up/articleshow/67499467.cms|archive-date=12 January 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Line 628: | Line 631: | ||
== Candidates == | == Candidates == | ||
{{main| List of National Democratic Alliance candidates in the 2019 Indian general election| List of United Progressive Alliance | {{main| List of National Democratic Alliance candidates in the 2019 Indian general election| List of United Progressive Alliance candidates in the 2019 Indian general election}} | ||
Altogether 8,039 candidates were in the fray for 542 parliamentary constituencies, i.e., 14.8 candidates per constituency on an average, according to PRS India, an NGO.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/analysis-contesting-candidates-general-election-2019|title=Analysis of the contesting candidates in General Election 2019|date=13 May 2019|website=PRSIndia|access-date=15 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190712060507/https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/analysis-contesting-candidates-general-election-2019|archive-date=12 July 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | Altogether 8,039 candidates were in the fray for 542 parliamentary constituencies, i.e., 14.8 candidates per constituency on an average, according to PRS India, an NGO.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/analysis-contesting-candidates-general-election-2019|title=Analysis of the contesting candidates in General Election 2019|date=13 May 2019|website=PRSIndia|access-date=15 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190712060507/https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/analysis-contesting-candidates-general-election-2019|archive-date=12 July 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Line 3,238: | Line 3,241: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="10" | | | rowspan="10" | | ||
| rowspan="10" | | | rowspan="10" |Ambedkar National Congress | ||
|Andhra Pradesh | |Andhra Pradesh | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
Line 6,478: | Line 6,481: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | |National Development Party | ||
|Karnataka | |Karnataka | ||
| colspan="2" |1 | | colspan="2" |1 | ||
Line 6,993: | Line 6,996: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="8" | | | rowspan="8" | | ||
| rowspan="8" | | rowspan="8" |Pyramid Party Of India | ||
|Andhra Pradesh | |Andhra Pradesh | ||
|20 | |20 | ||
Line 9,406: | Line 9,409: | ||
==Voter statistics== | ==Voter statistics== | ||
According to the ECI, 900 million people were eligible to vote, with an increase of 84.3 million voters since the last election in 2014,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/the-three-pillars-of-elections/article26704196.ece|title=The three pillars of elections|last=Sinha|first=Shishir|website=@businessline|access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190915092658/https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/the-three-pillars-of-elections/article26704196.ece|archive-date=15 September 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thequint.com/news/india/lok-sabha-2019-90-crore-voters-10-lakh-polling-stations-statistics|title=LS Polls 2019 in Numbers: Key Voter Stats You Should Know|date=10 March 2019|access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402175019/https://www.thequint.com/news/india/lok-sabha-2019-90-crore-voters-10-lakh-polling-stations-statistics|archive-date=2 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> making it the largest-ever election in the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/great-indian-elections-1951-2019-the-story-of-how-90-crore-voters-make-and-break-history-2062747.html|title=Great Indian Elections 1951–2019: The Story of How 90 Crore Voters Make and Break History|website=News18|date=11 March 2019|access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402174902/https://www.news18.com/news/india/great-indian-elections-1951-2019-the-story-of-how-90-crore-voters-make-and-break-history-2062747.html|archive-date=2 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> 15 million voters aged 18–19 years became eligible to vote for the first time.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://qz.com/india/1569796/election-commission-to-certify-google-twitter-lok-sabha-poll-ads/|title=15 million teenagers and 38,000 transgender people: How India's 2019 elections are different|last1=Singh|first1=Kuwar|website=Quartz India|access-date=23 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190522161657/https://qz.com/india/1569796/election-commission-to-certify-google-twitter-lok-sabha-poll-ads/|archive-date=22 May 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/lok-sabha-2019-more-than-90-crore-voters-register-to-vote/articleshow/68620296.cms|title=Lok Sabha 2019: More than 90 crore voters register to vote – Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405012942/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/lok-sabha-2019-more-than-90-crore-voters-register-to-vote/articleshow/68620296.cms|archive-date=5 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> 468 million eligible voters were males, 432 million were females and 38,325 identified themselves belonging to third gender. Total 71,735 overseas voters also enrolled.{{citation needed|date=May 2019}} | According to the ECI, 900 million people were eligible to vote, with an increase of 84.3 million voters since the last election in 2014,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/the-three-pillars-of-elections/article26704196.ece|title=The three pillars of elections|last=Sinha|first=Shishir|website=@businessline|date=April 2019 |access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190915092658/https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/the-three-pillars-of-elections/article26704196.ece|archive-date=15 September 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thequint.com/news/india/lok-sabha-2019-90-crore-voters-10-lakh-polling-stations-statistics|title=LS Polls 2019 in Numbers: Key Voter Stats You Should Know|date=10 March 2019|access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402175019/https://www.thequint.com/news/india/lok-sabha-2019-90-crore-voters-10-lakh-polling-stations-statistics|archive-date=2 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> making it the largest-ever election in the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/great-indian-elections-1951-2019-the-story-of-how-90-crore-voters-make-and-break-history-2062747.html|title=Great Indian Elections 1951–2019: The Story of How 90 Crore Voters Make and Break History|website=[[News18]]|date=11 March 2019|access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402174902/https://www.news18.com/news/india/great-indian-elections-1951-2019-the-story-of-how-90-crore-voters-make-and-break-history-2062747.html|archive-date=2 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> 15 million voters aged 18–19 years became eligible to vote for the first time.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://qz.com/india/1569796/election-commission-to-certify-google-twitter-lok-sabha-poll-ads/|title=15 million teenagers and 38,000 transgender people: How India's 2019 elections are different|last1=Singh|first1=Kuwar|website=Quartz India|date=11 March 2019 |access-date=23 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190522161657/https://qz.com/india/1569796/election-commission-to-certify-google-twitter-lok-sabha-poll-ads/|archive-date=22 May 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/lok-sabha-2019-more-than-90-crore-voters-register-to-vote/articleshow/68620296.cms|title=Lok Sabha 2019: More than 90 crore voters register to vote – Times of India|website=The Times of India|access-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190405012942/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/lok-sabha-2019-more-than-90-crore-voters-register-to-vote/articleshow/68620296.cms|archive-date=5 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> 468 million eligible voters were males, 432 million were females and 38,325 identified themselves belonging to [[third gender]]. Total 71,735 overseas voters also enrolled.{{citation needed|date=May 2019}} | ||
The residents of the former [[Enclave and exclave|enclaves]] exchanged under the [[India–Bangladesh enclaves|2015 India-Bangladesh boundary agreement]] voted for the first time.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://theprint.in/politics/north-bengal-gets-ready-for-epic-mamata-modi-battle-didis-image-vs-dadas-charm/217438/|title=North Bengal gets ready for epic Mamata-Modi battle — Didi's image vs Dada's charm|date=6 April 2019|access-date=6 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190406203358/https://theprint.in/politics/north-bengal-gets-ready-for-epic-mamata-modi-battle-didis-image-vs-dadas-charm/217438/|archive-date=6 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | The residents of the former [[Enclave and exclave|enclaves]] exchanged under the [[India–Bangladesh enclaves|2015 India-Bangladesh boundary agreement]] voted for the first time.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://theprint.in/politics/north-bengal-gets-ready-for-epic-mamata-modi-battle-didis-image-vs-dadas-charm/217438/|title=North Bengal gets ready for epic Mamata-Modi battle — Didi's image vs Dada's charm|date=6 April 2019|access-date=6 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190406203358/https://theprint.in/politics/north-bengal-gets-ready-for-epic-mamata-modi-battle-didis-image-vs-dadas-charm/217438/|archive-date=6 April 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Line 10,125: | Line 10,128: | ||
===State/UT-wise voter turnout details=== | ===State/UT-wise voter turnout details=== | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:95%;" | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:95%;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! State/UT | ! State/UT | ||
! Total electors | ! Total electors | ||
Line 10,131: | Line 10,134: | ||
! Total turnout | ! Total turnout | ||
! Total seats | ! Total seats | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Andaman & Nicobar Islands (UT) || 318,471 || 207,398 || 65.12% || 1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Andhra Pradesh | | Andhra Pradesh || 39,405,967 || 31,674,526 || 80.38% || 25 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Arunachal Pradesh || 803,563 || 659,766 || 82.11% || 2 | | Arunachal Pradesh || 803,563 || 659,766 || 82.11% || 2 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Assam | | Assam || 22,050,059 || 17,992,753 ||81.60% || 14 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Bihar | | Bihar || 71,216,290 || 40,830,453 || 57.33% || 40 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Chandigarh (UT) ||646,729 ||456,637 || 70.61% || 1 | | Chandigarh (UT) || 646,729 || 456,637 || 70.61% || 1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Chhattisgarh || 19,016,462 || 13,622,625 || 71.64% || 11 | | Chhattisgarh || 19,016,462 || 13,622,625 || 71.64% || 11 | ||
Line 10,155: | Line 10,157: | ||
| Gujarat || 45,152,373 || 29,128,364 || 64.51% || 26 | | Gujarat || 45,152,373 || 29,128,364 || 64.51% || 26 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Haryana | | Haryana || 18,057,010 || 12,701,029 || 70.34% || 10 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Himachal Pradesh || 5,330,154 || 3,859,940 || 72.42% || 4 | | Himachal Pradesh || 5,330,154 || 3,859,940 || 72.42% || 4 | ||
Line 10,173: | Line 10,175: | ||
| Maharashtra || 88,676,946 ||54,111,038 || 61.02% || 48 | | Maharashtra || 88,676,946 ||54,111,038 || 61.02% || 48 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Manipur | | Manipur || 1,959,563 || 1,620,451 || 82.69% || 2 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Meghalaya || 1,914,796 || 1,367,759 || 71.43% || 2 | | Meghalaya || 1,914,796 || 1,367,759 || 71.43% || 2 | ||
Line 10,181: | Line 10,183: | ||
| Nagaland || 1,213,777 || 1,007,437 || 83.00% || 1 | | Nagaland || 1,213,777 || 1,007,437 || 83.00% || 1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| NCT | | NCT of Delhi || 14,327,649 || 8,682,366 || 60.60% || 7 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Odisha || 32,497,762 || 23,817,169 || 73.29% || 21 | | Odisha || 32,497,762 || 23,817,169 || 73.29% || 21 | ||
Line 10,189: | Line 10,191: | ||
| Punjab || 20,892,673 || 13,777,295 || 65.94% || 13 | | Punjab || 20,892,673 || 13,777,295 || 65.94% || 13 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Rajasthan || 48, | | Rajasthan || 48,955,813 || 32,476,481 || 66.34% || 25 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Sikkim || 434,128 || 353,415 || 81.41% || 1 | | Sikkim || 434,128 || 353,415 || 81.41% || 1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Tamil Nadu || 59,941,832||43,419,753 || 72.44% || 39 | | Tamil Nadu || 59,941,832 || 43,419,753 || 72.44% || 39 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Telangana || 29,708,615 || 18,646,856 || 62.77% || 17 | | Telangana || 29,708,615 || 18,646,856 || 62.77% || 17 | ||
Line 10,199: | Line 10,201: | ||
| Tripura || 2,614,718 || 2,154,550 || 82.40% || 2 | | Tripura || 2,614,718 || 2,154,550 || 82.40% || 2 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Uttar Pradesh ||146,134,603 || 86,531,972 || 59.21% || 80 | | Uttar Pradesh || 146,134,603 || 86,531,972 || 59.21% || 80 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Uttarakhand || 7,856,318 ||4,861,415 || 61.88% || 5 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''India''' ||'''911,950,734''' || '''614,684,398'''||'''67.40%''' || '''543''' | | West Bengal || 70,001,284 || 57,230,018|| 81.76% || 42 | ||
|- class="sortbottom" | |||
| '''India''' || '''911,950,734''' || '''614,684,398''' || '''67.40%''' || '''543''' | |||
|} | |} | ||
Line 10,220: | Line 10,222: | ||
|value2=9.57|label2=[[Indian National Congress|INC]]|color2={{party color|Indian National Congress}} | |value2=9.57|label2=[[Indian National Congress|INC]]|color2={{party color|Indian National Congress}} | ||
|value3=4.41|label3=[[Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam|DMK]]|color3={{party color|Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam}} | |value3=4.41|label3=[[Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam|DMK]]|color3={{party color|Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam}} | ||
|value4=4.05|label4=[[ | |value4=4.05|label4=[[Trinamool Congress|AITC]]|color4={{party color|Trinamool Congress}} | ||
|value5=4.05|label5=[[YSR Congress Party|YSRCP]]|color5={{party color|YSR Congress Party}} | |value5=4.05|label5=[[YSR Congress Party|YSRCP]]|color5={{party color|YSR Congress Party}} | ||
|value6=3.31|label6=[[Shiv Sena|SS]]|color6={{party color|Shiv Sena}} | |value6=3.31|label6=[[Shiv Sena|SS]]|color6={{party color|Shiv Sena}} | ||
Line 10,232: | Line 10,234: | ||
| thumb = right | | thumb = right | ||
|caption='''Vote share of parties in the election'''|other=yes | |caption='''Vote share of parties in the election'''|other=yes | ||
|value1=37. | |value1=37.7|label1=[[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]]|color1={{party color|Bharatiya Janata Party}} | ||
|value2=19. | |value2=19.67|label2=[[Indian National Congress|INC]]|color2={{party color|Indian National Congress}} | ||
|value3=4. | |value3=4.1|label3=[[Trinamool Congress|AITC]]|color3={{party color|Trinamool Congress}} | ||
|value4=3. | |value4=3.66|label4=[[Bahujan Samaj Party|BSP]]|color4={{party color|Bahujan Samaj Party}} | ||
|value5=2.55|label5=[[Samajwadi Party|SP]]|color5={{party color|Samajwadi Party}} | |value5=2.55|label5=[[Samajwadi Party|SP]]|color5={{party color|Samajwadi Party}} | ||
|value6=2.53|label6=[[YSR Congress Party|YSRCP]]|color6={{party color|YSR Congress Party}} | |value6=2.53|label6=[[YSR Congress Party|YSRCP]]|color6={{party color|YSR Congress Party}} | ||
Line 10,241: | Line 10,243: | ||
|value8=2.10|label8=[[Shiv Sena|SS]]|color8={{party color|Shiv Sena}} | |value8=2.10|label8=[[Shiv Sena|SS]]|color8={{party color|Shiv Sena}} | ||
|value9=2.04|label9=[[Telugu Desam Party|TDP]]|color9={{party color|Telugu Desam Party}} | |value9=2.04|label9=[[Telugu Desam Party|TDP]]|color9={{party color|Telugu Desam Party}} | ||
|value10=1. | |value10=1.77|label10=[[Communist Party of India (Marxist)|CPI(M)]]|color10={{party color|Communist Party of India (Marxist)}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
<onlyinclude>{{Election results | <onlyinclude>{{Election results | ||
Line 10,247: | Line 10,249: | ||
|party1=[[Bharatiya Janata Party]]|votes1=229076879|seats1=303|sc1=+21 | |party1=[[Bharatiya Janata Party]]|votes1=229076879|seats1=303|sc1=+21 | ||
|party2=[[Indian National Congress]]|votes2=119495214|seats2=52|sc2=+8 | |party2=[[Indian National Congress]]|votes2=119495214|seats2=52|sc2=+8 | ||
|party3=[[ | |party3=[[Trinamool Congress]]|votes3=24929330|seats3=22|sc3=–12 | ||
|party4=[[Bahujan Samaj Party]]|votes4=22246501|seats4=10|sc4=+10 | |party4=[[Bahujan Samaj Party]]|votes4=22246501|seats4=10|sc4=+10 | ||
|party5=[[Samajwadi Party]]|votes5=15647206|seats5=5|sc5=0 | |party5=[[Samajwadi Party]]|votes5=15647206|seats5=5|sc5=0 | ||
Line 10,265: | Line 10,267: | ||
|party19=[[Communist Party of India]]|votes19=3576184|seats19=2|sc19=+1 | |party19=[[Communist Party of India]]|votes19=3576184|seats19=2|sc19=+1 | ||
|party20=[[Janata Dal (Secular)]]|votes20=3457107|seats20=1|sc20=–1 | |party20=[[Janata Dal (Secular)]]|votes20=3457107|seats20=1|sc20=–1 | ||
|party21=[[Lok | |party21=[[Lok Janshakti Party]]|votes21=3206979|seats21=6|sc21=0 | ||
|party22=[[Aam Aadmi Party]]|votes22=2716629|seats22=1|sc22=–3 | |party22=[[Aam Aadmi Party]]|votes22=2716629|seats22=1|sc22=–3 | ||
|party23=[[Pattali Makkal Katchi]]|votes23=2297431|seats23=0|sc23=–1 | |party23=[[Pattali Makkal Katchi]]|votes23=2297431|seats23=0|sc23=–1 | ||
Line 10,277: | Line 10,279: | ||
|party31=[[Rashtriya Lok Dal]]|votes31=1447363|seats31=0|sc31=0 | |party31=[[Rashtriya Lok Dal]]|votes31=1447363|seats31=0|sc31=0 | ||
|party32=[[All India United Democratic Front]]|votes32=1402088|seats32=1|sc32=–2 | |party32=[[All India United Democratic Front]]|votes32=1402088|seats32=1|sc32=–2 | ||
|party33=[[All India Majlis- | |party33=[[All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen]]|votes33=1201542|seats33=2|sc33=+1 | ||
|party34=[[Apna Dal (Sonelal)]]|votes34=1039478|seats34=2|sc34=New | |party34=[[Apna Dal (Sonelal)]]|votes34=1039478|seats34=2|sc34=New | ||
|party35=[[Hindustani Awam Morcha|Hindustani Awam Morcha (Secular)]]|votes35=956501|seats35=0|sc35=New | |party35=[[Hindustani Awam Morcha|Hindustani Awam Morcha (Secular)]]|votes35=956501|seats35=0|sc35=New | ||
Line 10,349: | Line 10,351: | ||
===Former Prime Minister to lose in the election=== | ===Former Prime Minister to lose in the election=== | ||
* [[H. D. Deve Gowda]] ([[Janata Dal (Secular)|JD-S]])- [[Prime Minister of India]] from | * [[H. D. Deve Gowda]] ([[Janata Dal (Secular)|JD-S]])- [[Prime Minister of India]] from 1996–1997 lost from [[Tumkur (Lok Sabha constituency)|Tumkur]] of [[Karnataka]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Sheila Dikshit to Digvijaya Singh: Meet 13 ex-chief ministers who lost in Elections 2019 |url=https://www.mynation.com/india-news/from-sheila-dikshit-to-digvijaya-singh-meet-these-13-chief-ministers-who-lost-lok-sabha-elections-ps0jre |access-date=11 March 2021 |work=My Nation |date=24 May 2019 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
===Former Chief Ministers to lose in the election=== | ===Former Chief Ministers to lose in the election=== | ||
Line 10,370: | Line 10,372: | ||
=== Reactions === | === Reactions === | ||
==== National ==== | ==== National ==== | ||
Indian National Congress party leaders such as [[Rahul Gandhi]] and others conceded defeat and congratulated Modi and his party.<ref name="PM Modi 2019">[https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/video/rahul-gandhi,Mamata Banerjee, M.K. Stalin,Ashok Gehlot, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Mayawati, Akhilesh Yadav, Mulayam Yadav -concedes-defeat-congratulates-pm-modi-smriti-irani-1532940-2019-05-23 Rahul Gandhi concedes defeat, congratulates PM Modi, Smriti Irani], India Today (23 May 2019)</ref> Other opposition parties and political leaders such as [[Sharad Pawar]],<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/election-result-2019-sharad-pawar-says-wont-blame-voting-machines-2041991 | title="Doubts Were Raised but Won't Blame EVMs": Sharad Pawar on Poll Result | access-date=3 June 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190603041442/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/election-result-2019-sharad-pawar-says-wont-blame-voting-machines-2041991 | archive-date=3 June 2019 | url-status=live }}</ref> [[Mamata Banerjee]] and [[Omar Abdullah]],<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/lok-sabha-election-results-omar-mamata-congratulate-modi-historic-win-1533379-2019-05-24|title=Lok Sabha Election Results: Omar was first, Mamata second to congratulate PM Modi for historic win|agency=Ist|newspaper=India Today|access-date=3 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190603131409/https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/lok-sabha-election-results-omar-mamata-congratulate-modi-historic-win-1533379-2019-05-24|archive-date=3 June 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> congratulated PM Modi and BJP for their victory. | [[File:Rahul gandhi speaking at pc.jpg|thumb|alt=Rahul Gandhi speaking at a press conference after the announcement of results as seen from [[The Ridge, Shimla]]|Rahul Gandhi speaks at a press conference after the announcement of results as seen from [[The Ridge, Shimla]]]] | ||
[[Indian National Congress]] party leaders such as [[Rahul Gandhi]] and others conceded defeat and congratulated Modi and his party.<ref name="PM Modi 2019">[https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/video/rahul-gandhi, Mamata Banerjee, M.K. Stalin, Ashok Gehlot, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Mayawati, Akhilesh Yadav, Mulayam Yadav -concedes-defeat-congratulates-pm-modi-smriti-irani-1532940-2019-05-23 Rahul Gandhi concedes defeat, congratulates PM Modi, Smriti Irani], India Today (23 May 2019)</ref> Other opposition parties and political leaders such as [[Sharad Pawar]],<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/election-result-2019-sharad-pawar-says-wont-blame-voting-machines-2041991 | title="Doubts Were Raised but Won't Blame EVMs": Sharad Pawar on Poll Result | access-date=3 June 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190603041442/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/election-result-2019-sharad-pawar-says-wont-blame-voting-machines-2041991 | archive-date=3 June 2019 | url-status=live }}</ref> [[Mamata Banerjee]] and [[Omar Abdullah]],<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/lok-sabha-election-results-omar-mamata-congratulate-modi-historic-win-1533379-2019-05-24|title=Lok Sabha Election Results: Omar was first, Mamata second to congratulate PM Modi for historic win|agency=Ist|newspaper=India Today|access-date=3 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190603131409/https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/lok-sabha-election-results-omar-mamata-congratulate-modi-historic-win-1533379-2019-05-24|archive-date=3 June 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> congratulated PM Modi and [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] for their victory. | |||
On 20 November 2019 the [[Association for Democratic Reforms]] filed a petition with the [[Supreme Court of India]] over alleged ballot-counting discrepancies in the Lok Sabha voting and seeking a probe by the ECI.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Tripathi |first1=Karan |title=PIL In SC Seeks ECI Action On Reports Of EVM Voter Data Discrepancies [Read Petition] |url=https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/pil-in-sc-seeks-eci-action-on-reports-of-electronic-voting-machine-data-discrepancies-149979 |access-date=25 November 2019 |work=LiveLaw.in |date=20 November 2019}}</ref> | On 20 November 2019 the [[Association for Democratic Reforms]] filed a petition with the [[Supreme Court of India]] over alleged ballot-counting discrepancies in the Lok Sabha voting and seeking a probe by the ECI.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Tripathi |first1=Karan |title=PIL In SC Seeks ECI Action On Reports Of EVM Voter Data Discrepancies [Read Petition] |url=https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/pil-in-sc-seeks-eci-action-on-reports-of-electronic-voting-machine-data-discrepancies-149979 |access-date=25 November 2019 |work=LiveLaw.in |date=20 November 2019}}</ref> | ||
==== International ==== | ==== International ==== | ||
The leaders of [[Afghanistan]], [[Argentina]], [[Australia]], [[Austria]], [[Bahrain]], [[Bangladesh]], [[Bhutan]], [[Botswana]], [[Brazil]], [[Bulgaria]], [[Burundi]], [[Canada]], [[China]], [[Comoros]], [[Cyprus]], [[Czech Republic]], [[Estonia]], [[France]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], [[Germany]], [[Ghana]], [[Iceland]], [[Indonesia]], [[Iran]], [[Israel]], [[Italy]], [[Jamaica]], [[Japan]], [[Kazakhstan]], [[Kenya]], [[Kuwait]], [[Kyrgyzstan]] [[Latvia]], [[Lesotho]], [[Liechtenstein|Lichtenstein]], [[Luxembourg]], [[Madagascar]], [[Malaysia]], [[Maldives]], [[Malta]], [[Mexico]], [[Mongolia]], [[Myanmar]], [[Namibia]], [[Nepal]], [[Netherlands]], [[Nicaragua]], [[North Korea]], [[Nigeria]], [[New Zealand]], [[Oman]], [[Pakistan]], [[State of Palestine|Palestine]], [[Portugal]], [[Qatar]], [[Russia]], [[Rwanda]], [[Saudi Arabia]], [[Senegal]], [[Seychelles]], [[Singapore]], [[South Africa]], [[South Korea]], [[Sri Lanka]], [[St. Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Switzerland]], [[Tajikistan]], [[Thailand]], [[Turkmenistan]], [[Uganda]], [[Ukraine]], [[United Arab Emirates]], [[United Kingdom]], [[United States]], [[Uzbekistan]], [[Venezuela]], [[Vietnam]], [[Zambia]], and [[Zimbabwe]] congratulated [[Narendra Modi]] and the [[BJP]] on their victory.<ref>*Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and United Arab Emirates: [https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/election-results-world-leaders-congratulate-narendra-modi-on-his-landslide-victory-1.1558612196940 Election results: World leaders congratulate Narendra Modi on his landslide victory] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190524003022/https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/election-results-world-leaders-congratulate-narendra-modi-on-his-landslide-victory-1.1558612196940 |date=24 May 2019 }}, Gulf News (23 May 2019) | The leaders of [[Afghanistan]], [[Argentina]], [[Australia]], [[Austria]], [[Bahrain]], [[Bangladesh]], [[Bhutan]], [[Botswana]], [[Brazil]], [[Bulgaria]], [[Burundi]], [[Canada]], [[China]], [[Comoros]], [[Cyprus]], [[Czech Republic]], [[Estonia]], [[France]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], [[Germany]], [[Ghana]], [[Iceland]], [[Indonesia]], [[Iran]], [[Israel]], [[Italy]], [[Jamaica]], [[Japan]], [[Kazakhstan]], [[Kenya]], [[Kuwait]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], [[Latvia]], [[Lesotho]], [[Liechtenstein|Lichtenstein]], [[Luxembourg]], [[Madagascar]], [[Malaysia]], [[Maldives]], [[Malta]], [[Mexico]], [[Mongolia]], [[Myanmar]], [[Namibia]], [[Nepal]], [[Netherlands]], [[Nicaragua]], [[North Korea]], [[Nigeria]], [[New Zealand]], [[Oman]], [[Pakistan]], [[State of Palestine|Palestine]], [[Portugal]], [[Qatar]], [[Russia]], [[Rwanda]], [[Saudi Arabia]], [[Senegal]], [[Seychelles]], [[Singapore]], [[South Africa]], [[South Korea]], [[Sri Lanka]], [[St. Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Switzerland]], [[Tajikistan]], [[Thailand]], [[Turkmenistan]], [[Uganda]], [[Ukraine]], [[United Arab Emirates]], [[United Kingdom]], [[United States]], [[Uzbekistan]], [[Venezuela]], [[Vietnam]], [[Zambia]], and [[Zimbabwe]] congratulated [[Narendra Modi]] and the [[BJP]] on their victory.<ref>*Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and United Arab Emirates: [https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/election-results-world-leaders-congratulate-narendra-modi-on-his-landslide-victory-1.1558612196940 Election results: World leaders congratulate Narendra Modi on his landslide victory] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190524003022/https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/election-results-world-leaders-congratulate-narendra-modi-on-his-landslide-victory-1.1558612196940 |date=24 May 2019 }}, Gulf News (23 May 2019) | ||
*Argentina: {{cite web|url=https://www.twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|title=Mauricio Macri "@mauriciomacri"|date=24 May 2019|website=Twitter|access-date=26 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527071725/https://twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|archive-date=27 May 2019|url-status=live}} | *Argentina: {{cite web|url=https://www.twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|title=Mauricio Macri "@mauriciomacri"|date=24 May 2019|website=Twitter|access-date=26 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527071725/https://twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|archive-date=27 May 2019|url-status=live}} | ||
*Argentina: {{cite web|url=https://www.twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|title=Mauricio Macri "@mauriciomacri"|date=24 May 2019|website=Twitter|access-date=26 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527071725/https://twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|archive-date=27 May 2019|url-status=live}} | *Argentina: {{cite web|url=https://www.twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|title=Mauricio Macri "@mauriciomacri"|date=24 May 2019|website=Twitter|access-date=26 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190527071725/https://twitter.com/mauriciomacri/status/1131925631594311681|archive-date=27 May 2019|url-status=live}} |