6
edits
imported>Yamaguchi先生 m (Reverted edits by 2405:201:C008:F03B:A404:810E:7AF6:1856 (talk) to last version by Citation bot) |
(robot: Update article (please report if you notice any mistake or error in this edit)) |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
==Literary career and public life== | ==Literary career and public life== | ||
Ramaswamy chose literary writing as the vehicle for expressing his rationalist thoughts, and he worked with his close friend Unnava Lakshminarayana, who was a renowned [[Telugu Brahmin]] Brahmo leader.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ramaswamy|first=Uma|date=1978|title=The Belief System of the Non-Brahmin Movement in India: The Andhra Case|journal=Asian Survey|volume=18|pages=294|doi=10.2307/2643221|jstor=2643221}}</ref> | Ramaswamy chose literary writing as the vehicle for expressing his rationalist thoughts, and he worked with his close friend Unnava Lakshminarayana, who was a renowned [[Telugu Brahmin]] Brahmo leader.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ramaswamy|first=Uma|date=1978|title=The Belief System of the Non-Brahmin Movement in India: The Andhra Case|journal=Asian Survey|volume=18|issue=3 |pages=294|doi=10.2307/2643221|jstor=2643221}}</ref> | ||
His poetic work ''[[Kuppuswamy Satakam]]'' reveals the theme of social revolution and talks about social evils, blind faith and indignity to man. In his other works such as ''[[Sambhukavadha]]'', ''[[Suthashrama geethaalu]]'', ''[[Dhoortha maanava]]'', ''[[Khooni]]'', ''[[Bhagavadgita]]'', ''[[Rana Pratap]]'' and ''[[Kondaveeti pathanam]]'', Ramaswamy made a rational analysis of dogmas prescribed by ancient classics and the injustice these dogmas did to people belonging to the lower social orders. Moreover, Ramaswamy attacked discriminatory practices and fought against the idea of [[untouchability]]. | His poetic work ''[[Kuppuswamy Satakam]]'' reveals the theme of social revolution and talks about social evils, blind faith and indignity to man. In his other works such as ''[[Sambhukavadha]]'', ''[[Suthashrama geethaalu]]'', ''[[Dhoortha maanava]]'', ''[[Khooni]]'', ''[[Bhagavadgita]]'', ''[[Rana Pratap]]'' and ''[[Kondaveeti pathanam]]'', Ramaswamy made a rational analysis of dogmas prescribed by ancient classics and the injustice these dogmas did to people belonging to the lower social orders. Moreover, Ramaswamy attacked discriminatory practices and fought against the idea of [[untouchability]]. | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
{{Commons category|Tripuraneni Ramaswamy}} | {{Commons category|Tripuraneni Ramaswamy}} | ||
* Ramaswamy Tripuraneni (1887–1943), Luminaries of 20th Century, Part 2, Potti Sreeramulu Telugu University, Hyderabad, 2005, pp: 552–3. | * Ramaswamy Tripuraneni (1887–1943), Luminaries of 20th Century, Part 2, Potti Sreeramulu Telugu University, Hyderabad, 2005, pp: 552–3. | ||
* {{citation |first=Uma |last=Ramaswamy |title=The Belief System of the Non-Brahmin Movement in India: The Andhra Case |journal=Asian Survey |volume=18 |number=3 |date=March 1978 |pages=290–300 |jstor=2643221 |ref={{sfnref|Ramaswamy, The Belief System of the Non-Brahmin Movement in India|1978}} |doi=10. | * {{citation |first=Uma |last=Ramaswamy |title=The Belief System of the Non-Brahmin Movement in India: The Andhra Case |journal=Asian Survey |volume=18 |number=3 |date=March 1978 |pages=290–300 |jstor=2643221 |ref={{sfnref|Ramaswamy, The Belief System of the Non-Brahmin Movement in India|1978}} |doi=10.2307/2643221}} | ||
* {{citation |first=Yamada |last=Keiko |title=Politics and representation of caste identity in regional historiography: A case study of Kammas in Andhra |journal=The Indian Economic and Social History Review |volume=45 |number=3 |year=2008 |pages=353–380 |doi=10.1177/001946460804500302 |s2cid=145663799 }} | * {{citation |first=Yamada |last=Keiko |title=Politics and representation of caste identity in regional historiography: A case study of Kammas in Andhra |journal=The Indian Economic and Social History Review |volume=45 |number=3 |year=2008 |pages=353–380 |doi=10.1177/001946460804500302 |s2cid=145663799 }} | ||