6
edits
Saumyasingh (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{good article}} {{redirect|Farming}} {{Use dmy dates|date=December 2020}} {{Use American English|date=March 2016}} {{short description|Cultivation of plants and animals to pr...") |
(robot: Update article) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Cultivation of plants and animals to provide useful products}} | |||
{{redirect|Farming}} | |||
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} | |||
{{good article}} | {{good article}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=December 2020}} | ||
{{Use American English|date=March 2016}} | {{Use American English|date=March 2016}} | ||
'''Agriculture''' is the practice of cultivating plants and livestock.<ref name="Office1999">{{cite book |title=Safety and health in agriculture |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=GtBa6XIW_aQC|page=77}} |year=1999 |publisher=International Labour Organization |isbn=978-92-2-111517-5 |page=77 |access-date=13 September 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722061757/http://books.google.com/books?id=GtBa6XIW_aQC |archive-date=22 July 2011|quote=defined agriculture as 'all forms of activities connected with growing, harvesting and primary processing of all types of crops, with the breeding, raising and caring for animals, and with tending gardens and nurseries'.}}</ref> Agriculture was the key development in the rise of [[sedentism|sedentary]] [[human civilization]], whereby farming of [[domestication|domesticated]] species created food [[economic surplus|surpluses]] that enabled people to live in cities. The [[history of agriculture]] began thousands of years ago. After gathering wild grains beginning at least 105,000 years ago, nascent farmers began to plant them around 11,500 years ago. Pigs, sheep, and cattle were domesticated over 10,000 years ago. Plants were independently cultivated in at least 11 regions of the world. [[Industrial agriculture]] based on large-scale [[monoculture]] in the twentieth century came to dominate agricultural output, though about 2 billion people still depended on [[subsistence agriculture]]. | [[File:Farm in Hainan 01.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|right|China has the largest agricultural output of any country.<ref name=UNCTAD2017 />]] | ||
{{Agriculture}} | |||
'''Agriculture''' or '''farming''' is the practice of cultivating [[plants]] and [[livestock]].<ref name="Office1999">{{cite book |title=Safety and health in agriculture |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=GtBa6XIW_aQC|page=77}} |year=1999 |publisher=International Labour Organization |isbn=978-92-2-111517-5 |page=77 |access-date=13 September 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722061757/http://books.google.com/books?id=GtBa6XIW_aQC |archive-date=22 July 2011|quote=defined agriculture as 'all forms of activities connected with growing, harvesting and primary processing of all types of crops, with the breeding, raising and caring for animals, and with tending gardens and nurseries'.}}</ref> Agriculture was the key development in the rise of [[sedentism|sedentary]] [[human civilization]], whereby farming of [[domestication|domesticated]] species created food [[economic surplus|surpluses]] that enabled people to live in cities. The [[history of agriculture]] began thousands of years ago. After gathering wild grains beginning at least 105,000 years ago, nascent farmers began to plant them around 11,500 years ago. Pigs, sheep, and cattle were domesticated over 10,000 years ago. Plants were independently cultivated in at least 11 regions of the world. [[Industrial agriculture]] based on large-scale [[monoculture]] in the twentieth century came to dominate agricultural output, though about 2 billion people still depended on [[subsistence agriculture]]. | |||
The major agricultural products can be broadly grouped into [[food]]s, [[fiber]]s, [[fuel]]s and [[raw material]]s (such as [[natural rubber|rubber]]). Food classes include [[cereal]]s ([[grains]]), [[vegetable]]s, [[fruit]]s, [[cooking oil|oils]], [[meat]], [[milk]], [[Egg as food|eggs]] and [[edible mushroom|fungi]]. Over one-third of the world's workers are employed in agriculture, second only to the [[service sector]], although in recent decades, the global trend of a decreasing number of agricultural workers continues, especially in developing countries where [[smallholding]] is being overtaken by [[industrial agriculture]] and [[Mechanised agriculture|mechanization]] that brings an enormous [[crop]] yield increase. | |||
Modern [[agronomy]], [[plant breeding]], [[agrochemical]]s such as [[pesticide]]s and [[fertilizer]]s, and technological developments have sharply increased crop yields, but causing [[Environmental impact of agriculture|ecological and environmental damage]]. [[Selective breeding]] and modern practices in [[animal husbandry]] have similarly increased the output of meat, but have raised concerns about [[animal welfare]] and environmental damage. Environmental issues include contributions to [[global warming]], depletion of [[aquifer]]s, [[deforestation]], [[antibiotic resistance]], and [[growth hormone]]s in [[industrial meat production]]. Agriculture is both a cause of and sensitive to [[environmental degradation]], such as [[biodiversity loss]], [[desertification]], [[soil degradation]] and [[Effects of climate change on agriculture|global warming]], all of which can cause decreases in crop yield. [[Genetically modified organism]]s are widely used, although some are banned in certain countries. | |||
{{anchor|Etymology|Scope}} | |||
== Etymology and scope == | |||
{{further|Horticulture#Scope}} | {{further|Horticulture#Scope}} | ||
The word ''agriculture'' is a late [[Middle English]] adaptation of Latin {{lang|la|agricultūra}}, from {{lang|la|ager}} 'field' and {{lang|la|cultūra}} '[[Tillage|cultivation]]' or 'growing'.<ref>{{cite book |page=[https://archive.org/details/oxforddictionary0000unse_x2z7/page/14 14] |title=The Oxford Dictionary of Word Histories |editor=Chantrell, Glynnis |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-19-863121-7 |url=https://archive.org/details/oxforddictionary0000unse_x2z7/page/14 }}</ref> While agriculture usually refers to human activities, certain species of [[Attine ants|ant]],<ref>{{cite news |last1=St. Fleur |first1=Nicholas |title=An Ancient Ant-Bacteria Partnership to Protect Fungus |newspaper=The New York Times |date=6 October 2018 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/science/ants-fungus-amber.html |access-date=14 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Li |first1=Hongjie |last2=Sosa Calvo |first2=Jeffrey |last3=Horn |first3=Heidi A. |last4=Pupo |first4=Mônica T. |last5=Clardy |first5=Jon |last6=Rabeling |first6=Cristian |last7=Schultz |first7=Ted R. |last8=Currie |first8=Cameron R. |title=Convergent evolution of complex structures for ant–bacterial defensive symbiosis in fungus-farming ants |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |date=2018 |volume=115 |issue=42 |pages=10725 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1809332115 |pmid=30282739 |pmc=6196509 }}</ref> [[termite]] and [[ambrosia beetle|beetle]] have been cultivating crops for up to 60 million years.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Evolution of Agriculture in Insects |journal=Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics |volume=36 |pages=563–595 | The word ''agriculture'' is a late [[Middle English]] adaptation of Latin {{lang |la |agricultūra}}, from {{lang |la |ager}} 'field' and {{lang |la |cultūra}} '[[Tillage|cultivation]]' or 'growing'.<ref>{{cite book |page=[https://archive.org/details/oxforddictionary0000unse_x2z7/page/14 14] |title=The Oxford Dictionary of Word Histories |editor=Chantrell, Glynnis |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-19-863121-7 |url=https://archive.org/details/oxforddictionary0000unse_x2z7/page/14 }}</ref> While agriculture usually refers to human activities, certain species of [[Attine ants|ant]],<ref>{{cite news |last1=St. Fleur |first1=Nicholas |title=An Ancient Ant-Bacteria Partnership to Protect Fungus |newspaper=The New York Times |date=6 October 2018 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/science/ants-fungus-amber.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/science/ants-fungus-amber.html |archive-date=2022-01-01 |url-access=limited |access-date=14 July 2020}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Li |first1=Hongjie |last2=Sosa Calvo |first2=Jeffrey |last3=Horn |first3=Heidi A. |last4=Pupo |first4=Mônica T. |last5=Clardy |first5=Jon |last6=Rabeling |first6=Cristian |last7=Schultz |first7=Ted R. |last8=Currie |first8=Cameron R. |title=Convergent evolution of complex structures for ant–bacterial defensive symbiosis in fungus-farming ants |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |date=2018 |volume=115 |issue=42 |pages=10725 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1809332115 |pmid=30282739 |pmc=6196509 |doi-access=free }}</ref> [[termite]] and [[ambrosia beetle|beetle]] have been cultivating crops for up to 60 million years.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Mueller |first=Ulrich G. |last2=Gerardo |first2=Nicole M. |author-link2=Nicole Gerardo |last3=Aanen |first3=Duur K. |last4=Six |first4=Diana L. |author-link4=Diana Six |last5=Schultz |first5=Ted R. |date=December 2005 |title=The Evolution of Agriculture in Insects |journal=Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics |volume=36 |pages=563–595 |doi=10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152626}}</ref> Agriculture is defined with varying scopes, in its broadest sense using natural resources to "produce commodities which maintain life, including food, fiber, forest products, horticultural crops, and their related services".<ref name=Maine /> Thus defined, it includes [[arable farming]], [[horticulture]], [[animal husbandry]] and [[forestry]], but horticulture and forestry are in practice often excluded.<ref name=Maine>{{cite web |url=http://www.maine.gov/education/aged/definition.html |title=Definition of Agriculture |publisher=State of Maine |access-date=6 May 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120323075557/http://www.maine.gov/education/aged/definition.html |archive-date=23 March 2012 }}</ref> | ||
It may also be broadly decomposed into '''plant agriculture''', which concerns the cultivation of useful plants,<ref name="Stevenson1971">{{cite journal | last=Stevenson | first=G. C. | title=Plant Agriculture Selected and introduced by Janick Jules and Others San Francisco: Freeman (1970), pp. 246, £2.10 | journal=Experimental Agriculture | publisher=Cambridge University Press (CUP) | volume=7 | issue=4 | year=1971 | issn=0014-4797 | doi=10.1017/s0014479700023371 | pages=363–363}}</ref> and '''animal agriculture''', the production of agricultural animals.<ref name="Herren2012">{{cite book | last=Herren | first=R.V. | title=Science of Animal Agriculture | publisher=Cengage Learning | year=2012 | isbn=978-1-133-41722-4 | url=https://books.google.com.br/books?id=-fQIAAAAQBAJ | access-date=2022-05-01 | page=}}</ref> | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
[[File:Vavilov-centers updated.jpg|thumb |upright=1.35 |[[Center of origin|Centres of origin]], as numbered by [[Nikolai Vavilov]] in the 1930s. Area 3 (gray) is no longer recognised as a centre of origin, and [[ | [[File:Vavilov-centers updated.jpg|thumb |upright=1.35 |[[Center of origin|Centres of origin]], as numbered by [[Nikolai Vavilov]] in the 1930s. Area 3 (gray) is no longer recognised as a centre of origin, and [[New Guinea]] (area P, orange) was identified more recently.<ref name=Larson2014 /><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Denham |first1=T. P. |title=Origins of Agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of New Guinea |journal=Science |volume=301 |issue=5630 |year=2003 |pages=189–193 |doi=10.1126/science.1085255 |pmid=12817084 |s2cid=10644185 }}</ref>]] | ||
{{Main|History of agriculture}} | {{Main|History of agriculture}} | ||
=== Origins === | === Origins === | ||
{{Main|Neolithic Revolution}} | {{Main|Neolithic Revolution}} | ||
The development of agriculture enabled the human population to grow many times larger than could be sustained by [[hunter-gatherer|hunting and gathering]].<ref name=Bocquet-Appel>{{cite journal |author=Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre |title=When the World's Population Took Off: The Springboard of the Neolithic Demographic Transition |journal=Science |date=29 July 2011 |volume=333 |issue=6042 |pages=560–561 |doi=10.1126/science.1208880 |pmid=21798934 |bibcode=2011Sci...333..560B |s2cid=29655920 }}</ref> Agriculture began independently in different parts of the globe,<ref name="Stephens 897–902">{{Cite journal |last1=Stephens |first1=Lucas |last2=Fuller |first2=Dorian |last3=Boivin |first3=Nicole |last4=Rick |first4=Torben |last5=Gauthier |first5=Nicolas |last6=Kay |first6=Andrea |last7=Marwick |first7=Ben |last8=Armstrong |first8=Chelsey Geralda |last9=Barton |first9=C. Michael|date=30 August 2019|title=Archaeological assessment reveals Earth's early transformation through land use |journal=Science |volume=365|issue=6456 |pages=897–902 |doi=10.1126/science.aax1192 |issn=0036-8075 |pmid=31467217 |hdl=10150/634688 |hdl-access=free |bibcode=2019Sci...365..897S |s2cid=201674203}}</ref> and included a diverse range of [[taxa]], in at least 11 separate [[centers | The development of agriculture enabled the human population to grow many times larger than could be sustained by [[hunter-gatherer|hunting and gathering]].<ref name=Bocquet-Appel>{{cite journal |author=Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre |title=When the World's Population Took Off: The Springboard of the Neolithic Demographic Transition |journal=Science |date=29 July 2011 |volume=333 |issue=6042 |pages=560–561 |doi=10.1126/science.1208880 |pmid=21798934 |bibcode=2011Sci...333..560B |s2cid=29655920 }}</ref> Agriculture began independently in different parts of the globe,<ref name="Stephens 897–902">{{Cite journal |last1=Stephens |first1=Lucas |last2=Fuller |first2=Dorian |last3=Boivin |first3=Nicole |last4=Rick |first4=Torben |last5=Gauthier |first5=Nicolas |last6=Kay |first6=Andrea |last7=Marwick |first7=Ben |last8=Armstrong |first8=Chelsey Geralda |last9=Barton |first9=C. Michael|date=30 August 2019|title=Archaeological assessment reveals Earth's early transformation through land use |journal=Science |volume=365|issue=6456 |pages=897–902 |doi=10.1126/science.aax1192 |issn=0036-8075 |pmid=31467217 |hdl=10150/634688 |hdl-access=free |bibcode=2019Sci...365..897S |s2cid=201674203}}</ref> and included a diverse range of [[taxa]], in at least 11 separate [[centers of origin]].<ref name="Larson2014">{{cite journal |doi=10.1073/pnas.1323964111 |title=Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies |journal=PNAS |volume=111 |issue=17 |pages=6139–6146 |year=2014 |last1=Larson |first1=G. |last2=Piperno |first2=D. R. |last3=Allaby |first3=R. G. |last4=Purugganan |first4=M. D. |last5=Andersson |first5=L. |last6=Arroyo-Kalin |first6=M. |last7=Barton |first7=L. |last8=Climer Vigueira |first8=C. |last9=Denham |first9=T. |last10=Dobney |first10=K. |last11=Doust |first11=A. N. |last12=Gepts |first12=P. |last13=Gilbert |first13=M. T. P. |last14=Gremillion |first14=K. J. |last15=Lucas |first15=L. |last16=Lukens |first16=L. |last17=Marshall |first17=F. B. |last18=Olsen |first18=K. M. |last19=Pires |first19=J.C. |last20=Richerson |first20=P. J. |last21=Rubio De Casas |first21=R. |last22=Sanjur |first22=O.I. |last23=Thomas |first23=M. G. |last24=Fuller |first24=D.Q. |doi-access=free |pmid=24757054 |pmc=4035915 |bibcode=2014PNAS..111.6139L}}</ref> Wild grains were collected and eaten from at least 105,000 years ago.<ref>{{cite magazine |last1=Harmon |first1=Katherine |title=Humans feasting on grains for at least 100,000 years |url=http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/humans-feasting-on-grains-for-at-least-100000-years/ |magazine=[[Scientific American]] |access-date=28 August 2016 |date=17 December 2009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160917013143/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/humans-feasting-on-grains-for-at-least-100000-years/ |archive-date=17 September 2016 }}</ref> In the Paleolithic levant, 23,000 years ago, cereals cultivation of [[emmer wheat|emmer]], [[barley]], and [[oats]] has been observed near the sea of Galilee. <ref>{{Cite journal |last=Snir |first=Ainit |last2=Nadel |first2=Dani |last3=Groman-Yaroslavski |first3=Iris |last4=Melamed |first4=Yoel |last5=Sternberg |first5=Marcelo |last6=Bar-Yosef |first6=Ofer |last7=Weiss |first7=Ehud |date=2015-07-22 |title=The Origin of Cultivation and Proto-Weeds, Long Before Neolithic Farming |url=https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131422 |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=10 |issue=7 |pages=e0131422 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0131422 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=4511808 |pmid=26200895}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=First evidence of farming in Mideast 23,000 years ago: Evidence of earliest small-scale agricultural cultivation |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150722144709.htm |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=ScienceDaily |language=en}}</ref> Rice was [[Agriculture in China|domesticated in China]] between 11,500 and 6,200 BC with the earliest known cultivation from 5,700 BC,<ref>{{cite journal |pmid=17898767 |year=2007 |last1=Zong |first1=Y. |last2=When |first2=Z. |last3=Innes |first3=J. B. |last4=Chen |first4=C. |last5=Wang |first5=Z. |last6=Wang |first6=H. |title=Fire and flood management of coastal swamp enabled first rice paddy cultivation in east China |volume=449 |issue=7161 |pages=459–462 |doi=10.1038/nature06135 |journal=Nature |bibcode=2007Natur.449..459Z |s2cid=4426729 }}</ref> followed by [[mung bean|mung]], [[soy]] and [[Azuki bean|azuki]] beans. Sheep were domesticated in [[Mesopotamia]] between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago.<ref>{{cite book |title=Sheep and Goat Science |edition=Fifth |last=Ensminger |first=M. E. |author2=Parker, R. O. |year=1986 |publisher=Interstate Printers and Publishers |isbn=978-0-8134-2464-4}}</ref> Cattle were domesticated from the wild [[aurochs]] in the areas of modern Turkey and Pakistan some 10,500 years ago.<ref name="McTavish">{{cite journal |author=McTavish, E. J. |author2=Decker, J. E. |author3=Schnabel, R.D. |author4=Taylor, J. F. |author5=Hillis, D. M. |year=2013 |title=New World cattle show ancestry from multiple independent domestication events |journal=PNAS |volume=110 |issue=15 |pages=E1398–1406 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1303367110 |pmid=23530234 |pmc=3625352 |bibcode=2013PNAS..110E1398M |doi-access=free }}</ref> [[Domestic pig|Pig production]] emerged in Eurasia, including Europe, East Asia and Southwest Asia,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Larson |first1=Greger |last2=Dobney |first2=Keith |author-link2= Keith Dobney |last3=Albarella |first3=Umberto |last4=Fang |first4=Meiying |last5=Matisoo-Smith |first5=Elizabeth |last6=Robins |first6=Judith |last7=Lowden |first7=Stewart |last8=Finlayson |first8=Heather |last9=Brand |first9=Tina |date=11 March 2005 |title=Worldwide Phylogeography of Wild Boar Reveals Multiple Centers of Pig Domestication |journal=Science |volume=307 |issue=5715 |pages=1618–1621 |doi=10.1126/science.1106927 |pmid=15761152|bibcode=2005Sci...307.1618L |s2cid=39923483 }}</ref> where [[wild boar]] were first domesticated about 10,500 years ago.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Larson |first1=Greger |last2=Albarella |first2=Umberto |last3=Dobney |first3=Keith |last4=Rowley-Conwy |first4=Peter |last5=Schibler |first5=Jörg |last6=Tresset |first6=Anne |last7=Vigne |first7=Jean-Denis |last8=Edwards |first8=Ceiridwen J. |last9=Schlumbaum |first9=Angela |date=25 September 2007 |title=Ancient DNA, pig domestication, and the spread of the Neolithic into Europe |journal=PNAS |volume=104 |issue=39 |pages=15276–15281 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0703411104 |pmid=17855556 |pmc=1976408 |bibcode=2007PNAS..10415276L |doi-access=free }}</ref> In the [[Andes]] of South America, the potato was domesticated between 10,000 and 7,000 years ago, along with beans, [[coca]], [[llama]]s, [[alpaca]]s, and [[guinea pig]]s. [[Sugarcane]] and some [[List of root vegetables|root vegetables]] were domesticated in [[New Guinea]] around 9,000 years ago. [[Sorghum]] was domesticated in the [[Sahel]] region of Africa by 7,000 years ago. Cotton was domesticated in [[Peru]] by 5,600 years ago,<ref name="Broudy1979">{{cite book |last=Broudy |first=Eric |title=The Book of Looms: A History of the Handloom from Ancient Times to the Present |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=shN5_-W1RzcC|page=81}} |year=1979 |publisher=UPNE |isbn=978-0-87451-649-4 |page=81 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180210232500/{{google books|plainurl=y|id=shN5_-W1RzcC|page=81}} |archive-date=10 February 2018}}</ref> and was independently domesticated in Eurasia. [[Agriculture in Mesoamerica|In Mesoamerica]], wild [[teosinte]] was bred into maize by 6,000 years ago.<ref>Johannessen, S.; Hastorf, C. A. (eds.) ''Corn and Culture in the Prehistoric New World'', Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.</ref> | ||
Scholars have offered multiple hypotheses to explain the historical origins of agriculture. Studies of the transition from [[hunter-gatherer]] to agricultural societies indicate an initial period of intensification and increasing [[sedentism]]; examples are the [[Natufian culture]] in the [[Levant]], and the Early Chinese Neolithic in China. Then, wild stands that had previously been harvested started to be planted, and gradually came to be domesticated.<ref>Hillman, G. C. (1996) "Late Pleistocene changes in wild plant-foods available to hunter-gatherers of the northern Fertile Crescent: Possible preludes to cereal cultivation". In D. R. Harris (ed.) ''The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia'', UCL Books, London, pp. 159–203. {{ISBN|9781857285383}}</ref><ref>Sato, Y. (2003) "Origin of rice cultivation in the Yangtze River basin". In Y. Yasuda (ed.) ''The Origins of Pottery and Agriculture'', Roli Books, New Delhi, p. 196</ref><ref name=b1>{{cite book |chapter=Australia and the Origins of Agriculture |author=Gerritsen, R. |title=Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology |date=2008 |publisher=Archaeopress |pages=29–30|isbn=978-1-4073-0354-3|doi=10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1896}}</ref> | Scholars have offered multiple hypotheses to explain the historical origins of agriculture. Studies of the transition from [[hunter-gatherer]] to agricultural societies indicate an initial period of intensification and increasing [[sedentism]]; examples are the [[Natufian culture]] in the [[Levant]], and the Early Chinese Neolithic in China. Then, wild stands that had previously been harvested started to be planted, and gradually came to be domesticated.<ref>Hillman, G. C. (1996) "Late Pleistocene changes in wild plant-foods available to hunter-gatherers of the northern Fertile Crescent: Possible preludes to cereal cultivation". In D. R. Harris (ed.) ''The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia'', UCL Books, London, pp. 159–203. {{ISBN|9781857285383}}</ref><ref>Sato, Y. (2003) "Origin of rice cultivation in the Yangtze River basin". In Y. Yasuda (ed.) ''The Origins of Pottery and Agriculture'', Roli Books, New Delhi, p. 196</ref><ref name=b1>{{cite book |chapter=Australia and the Origins of Agriculture |author=Gerritsen, R. |title=Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology |date=2008 |publisher=Archaeopress |pages=29–30|isbn=978-1-4073-0354-3|doi=10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1896}}</ref> | ||
=== Civilizations === | === Civilizations === | ||
[[File:Tomb of Nakht (2).jpg|thumb|left|upright|Agricultural scenes of [[threshing]], a grain store, harvesting with [[sickle]]s, digging, tree-cutting and ploughing from [[Ancient Egyptian agriculture|ancient Egypt]]. Tomb of [[Nakht]], 15th century BC]] | In Eurasia, the [[Sumer]]ians started to live in villages from about 8,000 BC, relying on the [[Tigris]] and [[Euphrates]] rivers and a canal system for irrigation. Ploughs appear in [[pictograph]]s around 3,000 BC; seed-ploughs around 2,300 BC. Farmers grew wheat, barley, vegetables such as lentils and onions, and fruits including dates, grapes, and figs.<ref name=BritMus>{{cite web |title=Farming |url=http://www.mesopotamia.co.uk/staff/resources/background/bg08/home.html |publisher=[[British Museum]] |access-date=15 June 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160616222522/http://www.mesopotamia.co.uk/staff/resources/background/bg08/home.html |archive-date=16 June 2016 }}</ref> [[Ancient Egyptian agriculture]] relied on the [[Nile River]] and its seasonal flooding. Farming started in the predynastic period at the end of the [[Paleolithic]], after 10,000 BC. Staple food crops were grains such as wheat and barley, alongside industrial crops such as [[flax]] and [[papyrus]].<ref name=Janick>{{cite journal |author=Janick, Jules |title=Ancient Egyptian Agriculture and the Origins of Horticulture |journal=Acta Hort. |volume=583 |pages=23–39 |url=https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/Hort_306/text/lec06.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Kees, Herman |title=Ancient Egypt: A Cultural Topography |url=https://archive.org/details/ancientegyptcult0000kees |url-access=registration |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=1961 |isbn=9780226429144 }}</ref> In [[Agriculture in India|India]], wheat, barley and [[jujube]] were domesticated by 9,000 BC, soon followed by sheep and goats.<ref name=gupta>{{cite journal |author=Gupta, Anil K. |title=Origin of agriculture and domestication of plants and animals linked to early Holocene climate amelioration |url=http://repository.ias.ac.in/21961/1/333.pdf |journal=Current Science |volume=87 |issue=1 |year=2004 |page=59 |jstor=24107979}}</ref> Cattle, sheep and goats were domesticated in [[Mehrgarh]] culture by 8,000–6,000 BC.<ref name=Baber>Baber, Zaheer (1996). ''The Science of Empire: Scientific Knowledge, Civilization, and Colonial Rule in India''. State University of New York Press. 19. {{ISBN|0-7914-2919-9}}.</ref><ref name=harrisandgosden385>Harris, David R. and Gosden, C. (1996). ''The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia: Crops, Fields, Flocks And Herds''. Routledge. p. 385. {{ISBN|1-85728-538-7}}.</ref><ref name=Possehl>Possehl, Gregory L. (1996). ''Mehrgarh'' in ''Oxford Companion to Archaeology'', Ed. Brian Fagan. Oxford University Press.</ref> Cotton was cultivated by the 5th–4th millennium BC.<ref>Stein, Burton (1998). ''A History of India''. Blackwell Publishing. p. 47. {{ISBN|0-631-20546-2}}.</ref> Archeological evidence indicates an animal-drawn [[plough]] from 2,500 BC in the [[Indus Valley Civilisation]].<ref name=lal>{{Cite journal |title=Thematic evolution of ISTRO: transition in scientific issues and research focus from 1955 to 2000 |first=R. |last=Lal |journal=Soil and Tillage Research |volume=61 |issue=1–2 |date=2001 |pages=3–12 |doi=10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00184-2}}</ref> | ||
In China, from the 5th century BC there was a nationwide [[granary]] system and widespread [[sericulture|silk farming]].<ref>[[#Needham|Needham]], Vol. 6, Part 2, pp. 55–57.</ref> Water-powered grain mills were in use by the 1st century BC,<ref>[[#Needham|Needham]], Vol. 4, Part 2, pp. 89, 110, 184.</ref> followed by irrigation.<ref>[[#Needham|Needham]], Vol. 4, Part 2, p. 110.</ref> By the late 2nd century, [[heavy plough]]s had been developed with iron ploughshares and [[mouldboard]]s.<ref name="greenberger 2006 11-12">Greenberger, Robert (2006) ''The Technology of Ancient China'', Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 11–12. {{ISBN|1404205586}}</ref><ref>[[Wang Zhongshu]], trans. by K. C. Chang and Collaborators, ''Han Civilization'' (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1982).</ref> These spread westwards across Eurasia.<ref>{{cite book |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=SaJlbWK_-FcC|page=270}} |author=Glick, Thomas F. |page=270 |title=Medieval Science, Technology And Medicine: An Encyclopedia |publisher=Psychology Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-415-96930-7 |series=Volume 11 of The Routledge Encyclopedias of the Middle Ages Series}}</ref> Asian rice was domesticated 8,200–13,500 years ago – depending on the [[molecular clock]] estimate that is used<ref name="pnas1">{{Cite journal |last1=Molina |first1=J. |last2=Sikora |first2=M. |last3=Garud |first3=N. |last4=Flowers |first4=J. M. |last5=Rubinstein |first5=S. |last6=Reynolds |first6=A. |last7=Huang |first7=P. |last8=Jackson |first8=S. |last9=Schaal |first9=B. A. |last10=Bustamante |doi=10.1073/pnas.1104686108 |first10=C. D. |last11=Boyko |first11=A. R. |last12=Purugganan |first12=M. D. |title=Molecular evidence for a single evolutionary origin of domesticated rice |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=108 |issue=20 |pages=8351–8356 |year=2011 |pmid=21536870|pmc=3101000|bibcode=2011PNAS..108.8351M |doi-access=free }}</ref>– on the Pearl River in southern China with a single genetic origin from the wild rice ''[[Oryza rufipogon]]''.<ref name="nature1">{{cite journal |title=A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice |journal=Nature |doi=10.1038/nature11532 |year=2012 |last1=Huang |first1=Xuehui |last2=Kurata |first2=Nori |last3=Wei |first3=Xinghua |last4=Wang |first4=Zi-Xuan |last5=Wang |first5=Ahong |last6=Zhao |first6=Qiang |last7=Zhao |first7=Yan|last8=Liu |first8=Kunyan |last9=Lu |first9=Hengyun |last10=Li |first10=Wenjun |last11=Gu |first11=Yunli |last12=Lu |first12=Yiqi |last13=Zhou |first13=Congcong|last14=Fan|first14=Danlin |last15=Weng |first15=Qijun |last16=Zhu |first16=Chuanrang |last17=Huang |first17=Tao |last18=Zhang |first18=Lei|last19=Wang |first19=Yongchun |last20=Feng |first20=Lei |last21=Furuumi |first21=Hiroyasu |last22=Kubo |first22=Takahiko |last23=Miyabayashi|first23=Toshie |last24=Yuan |first24=Xiaoping |last25=Xu |first25=Qun |last26=Dong |first26=Guojun |last27=Zhan |first27=Qilin |last28=Li |first28=Canyang |last29=Fujiyama |first29=Asao|last30=Toyoda |first30=Atsushi |volume=490 |issue=7421 |pages=497–501 |pmid=23034647 |pmc=7518720 |display-authors=8 |bibcode=2012Natur.490..497H |doi-access=free }}</ref> In [[Agriculture in ancient Greece|Greece<!--this is the only link to Agr of ancient Greece-->]] and [[Agriculture in ancient Rome|Rome<!--this is the only link to Agr of ancient Rome-->]], the major cereals were wheat, emmer, and barley, alongside vegetables including peas, beans, and olives. Sheep and goats were kept mainly for dairy products.<ref name="koester 1995 p76-77">Koester, Helmut (1995), ''History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age'', 2nd edition, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 76–77. {{ISBN|3-11-014693-2}}</ref><ref name="White">White, K. D. (1970), ''Roman Farming''. Cornell University Press.</ref>[[File:Tomb of Nakht (2).jpg|thumb|left|upright|Agricultural scenes of [[threshing]], a grain store, harvesting with [[sickle]]s, digging, tree-cutting and ploughing from [[Ancient Egyptian agriculture|ancient Egypt]]. Tomb of [[Nakht]], 15th century BC]] | |||
In | In the Americas, crops domesticated in Mesoamerica (apart from [[teosinte]]) include squash, beans, and [[Theobroma cacao|cacao]].<ref name="Murphy2011">{{cite book |author=Murphy, Denis |title=Plants, Biotechnology and Agriculture |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=etQsieKuRH8C|page=153}} |year=2011 |publisher=CABI |isbn=978-1-84593-913-7 |page=153}}</ref> Cocoa was being domesticated by the Mayo Chinchipe of the upper Amazon around 3,000 BC.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Davis |first1=Nicola |title=Origin of chocolate shifts 1,400 miles and 1,500 years |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/oct/29/origin-of-chocolate-shifts-1400-miles-and-1500-years-cacao-ecuador |access-date=31 October 2018 |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=29 October 2018}}</ref> | ||
The [[domestic turkey|turkey]] was probably domesticated in Mexico or the American Southwest.<ref name="Speller">{{cite journal |last1=Speller |first1=Camilla F. |author-link1=Camilla Speller |display-authors=etal |title=Ancient mitochondrial DNA analysis reveals complexity of indigenous North American turkey domestication|journal=PNAS |date=2010 |volume=107 |issue=7 |pages=2807–2812 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0909724107 |pmid=20133614 |pmc=2840336|bibcode=2010PNAS..107.2807S |doi-access=free }}</ref> The [[Aztec]]s developed irrigation systems, formed [[Terrace (agriculture)|terraced]] hillsides, fertilized their soil, and developed [[chinampa]]s or artificial islands. The [[Maya civilization|Mayas]] used extensive canal and raised field systems to farm swampland from 400 BC.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101105/full/news.2010.587.html|title=Mayans converted wetlands to farmland |author=Mascarelli, Amanda |journal=Nature |date=5 November 2010 |doi=10.1038/news.2010.587}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Invisible Artifacts: Uncovering Secrets of Ancient Maya Agriculture with Modern Soil Science |journal=Soil Horizons |author=Morgan, John |date=6 November 2013 |doi=10.2136/sh2012-53-6-lf |volume=53 |issue=6 |page=3 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Spooner 2005 14694–99">{{cite journal |title=A single domestication for potato based on multilocus amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping |last1=Spooner |first1=David M. |first2=Karen |last2=McLean |first3=Gavin |last3=Ramsay |first4=Robbie |last4=Waugh |first5=Glenn J. |last5=Bryan |journal=[[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|PNAS]] |volume=102 |issue=41 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0507400102 |pmc=1253605 |pages=14694–14699 |pmid=16203994 |year=2005 |bibcode=2005PNAS..10214694S |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="online">{{cite book |author=Office of International Affairs |title=Lost Crops of the Incas: Little-Known Plants of the Andes with Promise for Worldwide Cultivation |date=1989 |url=http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=030904264X&page=92 |work=nap.edu |isbn=978-0-309-04264-2 |page=92|doi=10.17226/1398 }}</ref><ref name="John Michael Francis 2005">{{cite book |author=Francis, John Michael |title=Iberia and the Americas |publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]] |year=2005 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=OMNoS-g1h8cC|page=867}} |isbn=978-1-85109-426-4 }}</ref> [[Coca]] was domesticated in the Andes, as were the peanut, tomato, tobacco, and [[pineapple]].<ref name="Murphy2011" /> Cotton was domesticated in [[Peru]] by 3,600 BC.<ref name="Broudy1979 p81">{{cite book |last=Broudy |first=Eric |title=The Book of Looms: A History of the Handloom from Ancient Times to the Present|url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=shN5_-W1RzcC|page=81}} |year=1979 |publisher=UPNE |isbn=978-0-87451-649-4 |page=81}}</ref> Animals including [[llama]]s, [[alpaca]]s, and [[guinea pig]]s were domesticated there.<ref name="RischkowskyPilling2007">{{cite book |last1=Rischkowsky |first1=Barbara |last2=Pilling |first2=Dafydd |title=The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=Skpj197tU0oC|page=10 }}|year=2007 |publisher=Food & Agriculture Organization |isbn=978-92-5-105762-9 |page=10}}</ref> In [[History of agriculture in the United States|North America]], the indigenous people of the [[Eastern Agricultural Complex|East domesticated crops]] such as [[sunflower]], tobacco,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Heiser Jr |first1=Carl B. |year=1992 |title=On possible sources of the tobacco of prehistoric Eastern North America |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=33 |pages=54–56 |doi=10.1086/204032|s2cid=144433864 }}</ref> squash and ''[[Chenopodium]]''.<ref>{{cite book|author=Ford, Richard I. |page=75|title=Prehistoric Food Production in North América|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eeuzAAAAIAAJ|year=1985|publisher=University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Publications Department|isbn=978-0-915703-01-2}}</ref><ref>Adair, Mary J. (1988) ''Prehistoric Agriculture in the Central Plains.'' Publications in Anthropology 16. University of Kansas, Lawrence.</ref> Wild foods including [[wild rice]] and [[maple sugar]] were harvested.<ref name="Smith2013">{{cite book |last=Smith |first=Andrew |title=The Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink in America |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=DOJMAgAAQBAJ|page=1}} |year=2013 |publisher=OUP USA |isbn=978-0-19-973496-2 |page=1}}</ref> The domesticated [[strawberry]] is a hybrid of a Chilean and a North American species, developed by breeding in Europe and North America.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Hardigan |first1=Michael A. |title=P0653: Domestication History of Strawberry: Population Bottlenecks and Restructuring of Genetic Diversity through Time |url=https://pag.confex.com/pag/xxvi/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/28409 |publisher=Pland & Animal Genome Conference XXVI 13–17 January 2018 San Diego, California |access-date=28 February 2018}}</ref> The [[Agriculture in the prehistoric Southwest|indigenous people of the Southwest]] and the [[Pacific Northwest]] practiced [[forest gardening]] and [[fire-stick farming]]. The [[Native American use of fire|natives controlled fire]] on a regional scale to create a low-intensity [[fire ecology]] that [[Sustainable agriculture|sustained a low-density agriculture]] in loose rotation; a sort of "wild" [[permaculture]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Fire in California's Ecosystems |url=https://archive.org/details/firecaliforniase00sugi |url-access=limited |editor1=Sugihara, Neil G. |editor2=Van Wagtendonk, Jan W. |editor3=Shaffer, Kevin E. |editor4=Fites-Kaufman, Joann |editor5=Thode, Andrea E. |publisher=University of California Press |year=2006 |page=[https://archive.org/details/firecaliforniase00sugi/page/n433 417] |chapter=17 |isbn=978-0-520-24605-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |editor=Blackburn, Thomas C. |editor2=Anderson, Kat |year=1993 |title=Before the Wilderness: Environmental Management by Native Californians |publisher=Ballena Press |isbn=978-0-87919-126-9}}</ref><ref name="Cunningham2010">{{cite book |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=nuYuYGHwCygC|page=135 }}|pages=135, 173–202 |last=Cunningham |first=Laura |title=State of Change: Forgotten Landscapes of California |publisher=Heyday |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-59714-136-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Anderson |first=M. Kat |title=Tending the Wild: Native American Knowledge And the Management of California's Natural Resources |url=https://archive.org/details/tendingwildnativ0000ande |url-access=registration |publisher=University of California Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-520-24851-9}}</ref> A system of [[companion planting]] called [[Three Sisters (agriculture)|the Three Sisters]] was developed in North America. The three crops were [[winter squash]], maize, and climbing beans.<ref name="wilson">{{cite book |title=Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians: An Indian Interpretation |last=Wilson |first=Gilbert |year=1917 |publisher=Dodo Press |isbn=978-1-4099-4233-7 |pages=25 and passim |url=http://www.bookdepository.com/publishers/Dodo-Press |ref=wilson1917 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314055513/http://www.bookdepository.com/publishers/Dodo-Press |archive-date=14 March 2016 }}</ref><ref name="landon">{{cite journal |last=Landon |first=Amanda J. |title=The "How" of the Three Sisters: The Origins of Agriculture in Mesoamerica and the Human Niche |journal=Nebraska Anthropologist |year=2008 |url=http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=nebanthro |pages=110–124}}</ref> | |||
[[Indigenous Australians]], long supposed to have been nomadic [[hunter-gatherers]], practised systematic burning, possibly to enhance natural productivity in fire-stick farming.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Jones |first=R. |doi=10.1007/BF03400623 |title=Fire-stick Farming|journal=Fire Ecology |volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=3–8 |year=2012 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Scholars have pointed out that hunter-gatherers need a productive environment to support gathering without cultivation. Because the forests of New Guinea have few food plants, early humans may have used "selective burning" to increase the productivity of the wild [[karuka]] fruit trees to support the hunter-gatherer way of life.<ref>MLA Rowley-Conwy, Peter, and Robert Layton. “Foraging and farming as niche construction: stable and unstable adaptations.” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences vol. 366,1566 (2011): 849-62. {{doi|10.1098/rstb.2010.0307}}</ref> | |||
The [[Gunditjmara]] and other groups developed eel farming and fish trapping systems from some 5,000 years ago.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Williams |first=Elizabeth |year=1988 |title=Complex Hunter-Gatherers: A Late Holocene Example from Temperate Australia |journal=Archaeopress Archaeology |volume=423}}</ref> There is evidence of 'intensification' across the whole continent over that period.<ref>{{cite book |last=Lourandos |first=Harry |year=1997 |title=Continent of Hunter-Gatherers: New Perspectives in Australian Prehistory |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> In two regions of Australia, the central west coast and eastern central, early farmers cultivated yams, native millet, and bush onions, possibly in permanent settlements.<ref name=b1 /><ref>{{cite book |last=Gammage |first=Bill |author-link=Bill Gammage |date=October 2011 |title=The Biggest Estate on Earth: How Aborigines made Australia |url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=aUddY9fGkNMC}} |publisher=Allen & Unwin |isbn=978-1-74237-748-3 |pages=281–304}}</ref> | |||
===Revolution === | ===Revolution === | ||
[[File: | [[File:Crescenzi calendar.jpg|thumb|Agricultural calendar, c. 1470, from a manuscript of [[Pietro de Crescenzi]]]] | ||
In the [[Middle Ages]], compared to the Roman period, agriculture in [[Western Europe]] became more focused on [[Self-sustainability|self-sufficiency]]. The agricultural population under feudalism was typically organized into [[Manorialism|manors]] consisting of several hundred or more acres of land presided over by a [[Lord of the manor|Lord]] with a [[Roman Catholic]] church and priest.<ref name="NatGeographic2015">{{cite book |author=National Geographic |title=Food Journeys of a Lifetime |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=h2Q5BgAAQBAJ|page=126}} |year=2015 |publisher=[[National Geographic Society]] |isbn=978-1-4262-1609-1 |page=126}}</ref> | |||
Thanks to the exchange with the [[Al-Andalus]] where the [[Arab Agricultural Revolution|Arab agricultural revolution]] was underway, European agriculture transformed with improved techniques and the diffusion of crop plants, including the introduction of sugar, rice, cotton and fruit trees (such as the orange).<ref name="Watson">{{cite journal |first=Andrew M. |last=Watson |date=1974 |title=The Arab Agricultural Revolution and Its Diffusion, 700–1100 |journal=The Journal of Economic History |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=8–35 |doi=10.1017/s0022050700079602}}</ref> | |||
After 1492 the [[Columbian exchange]] brought New World crops such as maize, potatoes, tomatoes, [[sweet potato]]es and [[manioc]] to Europe, and Old World crops such as wheat, barley, rice and [[turnip]]s, and livestock (including horses, cattle, sheep and goats) to the Americas.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/american-indians/essays/columbian-exchange |title=The Columbian Exchange |publisher=The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History |author=Crosby, Alfred |access-date=11 May 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703092537/http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/american-indians/essays/columbian-exchange |archive-date=3 July 2013}}</ref> | |||
[[Irrigation]], [[crop rotation]], and [[fertilizers]] advanced from the 17th century with the [[British Agricultural Revolution]], allowing global population to rise significantly. Since 1900 agriculture in developed nations, and to a lesser extent in the developing world, has seen large rises in productivity as [[Mechanized farming|mechanization]] replaces human labor, and assisted by [[synthetic fertilizer]]s, pesticides, and [[selective breeding]]. The [[Haber-Bosch]] method allowed the synthesis of [[ammonium nitrate]] fertilizer on an industrial scale, greatly increasing [[crop yields]] and sustaining a further increase in global population.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/hort_306/text/lec32.pdf |title=Agricultural Scientific Revolution: Mechanical |author=Janick, Jules |publisher=Purdue University |access-date=24 May 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130525074054/http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/Hort_306/text/lec32.pdf |archive-date=25 May 2013 |df =dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/52548/52645.aspx |title=The Impact of Mechanization on Agriculture |journal=The Bridge on Agriculture and Information Technology |date=2011 |volume=41 |number=3 |author=Reid, John F. |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105033809/http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/52548/52645.aspx |archive-date=5 November 2013 }}</ref> Modern agriculture has raised or encountered ecological, political, and economic issues including [[water pollution]], [[biofuel]]s, [[genetically modified organism]]s, [[tariff]]s and [[Agricultural subsidy|farm subsidies]], leading to alternative approaches such as the [[organic movement]].<ref name="motherjones1">{{cite magazine |url=https://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/04/history-nitrogen-fertilizer-ammonium-nitrate |last=Philpott |first=Tom |title=A Brief History of Our Deadly Addiction to Nitrogen Fertilizer |date=19 April 2013 |access-date=7 May 2013 |magazine=Mother Jones |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130505115125/https://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/04/history-nitrogen-fertilizer-ammonium-nitrate |archive-date=5 May 2013}}</ref><ref name="smh.com.au">{{cite journal |url=http://www.smh.com.au/world/ten-worst-famines-of-the-20th-century-20110815-1iu2w.html |title=Ten worst famines of the 20th century |journal=Sydney Morning Herald |date=15 August 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140703063152/http://www.smh.com.au/world/ten-worst-famines-of-the-20th-century-20110815-1iu2w.html |archive-date=3 July 2014}} | [[Irrigation]], [[crop rotation]], and [[fertilizers]] advanced from the 17th century with the [[British Agricultural Revolution]], allowing global population to rise significantly. Since 1900 agriculture in developed nations, and to a lesser extent in the developing world, has seen large rises in productivity as [[Mechanized farming|mechanization]] replaces human labor, and assisted by [[synthetic fertilizer]]s, pesticides, and [[selective breeding]]. The [[Haber-Bosch]] method allowed the synthesis of [[ammonium nitrate]] fertilizer on an industrial scale, greatly increasing [[crop yields]] and sustaining a further increase in global population.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/hort_306/text/lec32.pdf |title=Agricultural Scientific Revolution: Mechanical |author=Janick, Jules |publisher=Purdue University |access-date=24 May 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130525074054/http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/Hort_306/text/lec32.pdf |archive-date=25 May 2013 |df =dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/52548/52645.aspx |title=The Impact of Mechanization on Agriculture |journal=The Bridge on Agriculture and Information Technology |date=2011 |volume=41 |number=3 |author=Reid, John F. |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105033809/http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/52548/52645.aspx |archive-date=5 November 2013 }}</ref> Modern agriculture has raised or encountered ecological, political, and economic issues including [[water pollution]], [[biofuel]]s, [[genetically modified organism]]s, [[tariff]]s and [[Agricultural subsidy|farm subsidies]], leading to alternative approaches such as the [[organic movement]].<ref name="motherjones1">{{cite magazine |url=https://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/04/history-nitrogen-fertilizer-ammonium-nitrate |last=Philpott |first=Tom |title=A Brief History of Our Deadly Addiction to Nitrogen Fertilizer |date=19 April 2013 |access-date=7 May 2013 |magazine=Mother Jones |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130505115125/https://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/04/history-nitrogen-fertilizer-ammonium-nitrate |archive-date=5 May 2013}}</ref><ref name="smh.com.au">{{cite journal |url=http://www.smh.com.au/world/ten-worst-famines-of-the-20th-century-20110815-1iu2w.html |title=Ten worst famines of the 20th century |journal=Sydney Morning Herald |date=15 August 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140703063152/http://www.smh.com.au/world/ten-worst-famines-of-the-20th-century-20110815-1iu2w.html |archive-date=3 July 2014}} | ||
Line 50: | Line 57: | ||
== Types == | == Types == | ||
[[File:Reindeer herding.jpg|thumb|left|[[Reindeer]] herds form the basis of pastoral agriculture for several Arctic and Subarctic peoples.]] | [[File:Reindeer herding.jpg|thumb|left|[[Reindeer]] herds form the basis of pastoral agriculture for several Arctic and Subarctic peoples.]] | ||
[[File:Unload wheat by the combine Claas Lexion 584.jpg|thumb|[[Harvest]]ing [[wheat]] with a [[combine harvester]] accompanied by a tractor and trailer]] | |||
[[Pastoralism]] involves managing domesticated animals. In [[nomadic pastoralism]], herds of livestock are moved from place to place in search of pasture, fodder, and water. This type of farming is practised in arid and semi-arid regions of [[Sahara]], Central Asia and some parts of India.<ref>{{cite book |last=Blench |first=Roger |title=Pastoralists in the new millennium |publisher=FAO |date=2001 |pages=11–12 |url=http://www.odi.org.uk/work/projects/pdn/eps.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120201000745/http://www.odi.org.uk/work/projects/pdn/eps.pdf |archive-date=1 February 2012 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> | |||
[[ | [[File:Manuring a vegetable garden.jpg|thumb|Spreading manure by hand in Zambia]] | ||
In [[shifting cultivation]], a small area of forest is cleared by cutting and burning the trees. The cleared land is used for growing crops for a few years until the soil becomes too infertile, and the area is abandoned. Another patch of land is selected and the process is repeated. This type of farming is practiced mainly in areas with abundant rainfall where the forest regenerates quickly. This practice is used in Northeast India, Southeast Asia, and the Amazon Basin.<ref>{{cite web |title=Shifting cultivation |url=http://www.survivalinternational.org/about/swidden |publisher=[[Survival International]] |access-date=28 August 2016 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160829015112/http://www.survivalinternational.org/about/swidden |archive-date=29 August 2016|df=dmy-all}}</ref> | In [[shifting cultivation]], a small area of forest is cleared by cutting and burning the trees. The cleared land is used for growing crops for a few years until the soil becomes too infertile, and the area is abandoned. Another patch of land is selected and the process is repeated. This type of farming is practiced mainly in areas with abundant rainfall where the forest regenerates quickly. This practice is used in Northeast India, Southeast Asia, and the Amazon Basin.<ref>{{cite web |title=Shifting cultivation |url=http://www.survivalinternational.org/about/swidden |publisher=[[Survival International]] |access-date=28 August 2016 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160829015112/http://www.survivalinternational.org/about/swidden |archive-date=29 August 2016|df=dmy-all}}</ref> | ||
[[Subsistence farming]] is practiced to satisfy family or local needs alone, with little left over for transport elsewhere. It is intensively practiced in Monsoon Asia and South-East Asia.<ref>{{cite book |author=Waters, Tony |title=The Persistence of Subsistence Agriculture: life beneath the level of the marketplace |publisher=Lexington Books |date=2007}}</ref> An estimated 2.5 billion subsistence farmers worked in 2018, cultivating about 60% of the earth's [[arable land]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=<!--no byline--> |date=7 March 2018 |title=Chinese project offers a brighter farming future |department=Editorial |journal=Nature |volume=555 |issue=7695 |page=141 |doi=10.1038/d41586-018-02742-3 |pmid=29517037 |bibcode=2018Natur.555R.141. |doi-access=free }}</ref> | [[Subsistence farming]] is practiced to satisfy family or local needs alone, with little left over for transport elsewhere. It is intensively practiced in Monsoon Asia and South-East Asia.<ref>{{cite book |author=Waters, Tony |title=The Persistence of Subsistence Agriculture: life beneath the level of the marketplace |publisher=Lexington Books |date=2007}}</ref> An estimated 2.5 billion subsistence farmers worked in 2018, cultivating about 60% of the earth's [[arable land]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=<!--no byline--> |date=7 March 2018 |title=Chinese project offers a brighter farming future |department=Editorial |journal=Nature |volume=555 |issue=7695 |page=141 |doi=10.1038/d41586-018-02742-3 |pmid=29517037 |bibcode=2018Natur.555R.141. |doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
Line 64: | Line 71: | ||
=== Status === | === Status === | ||
From the twentieth century, intensive agriculture increased productivity. It substituted synthetic fertilizers and pesticides for labour, but caused increased water pollution, and often involved farm subsidies. In recent years there has been a backlash against the [[environmental awareness|environmental effects]] of conventional agriculture, resulting in the [[organic farming|organic]], [[Regenerative agriculture|regenerative]], and [[sustainable agriculture]] movements.<ref name="motherjones1" /><ref>{{cite web |publisher=The World Bank |year=1995 |url=http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=469372&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000009265_3970311122936 |title=Overcoming agricultural pollution of water: the challenge of integrating agricultural and environmental policies in the European Union, Volume 1 |access-date=15 April 2013 |author=Scheierling, Susanne M. |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605112426/http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=469372&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000009265_3970311122936 |archive-date=5 June 2013}}</ref> One of the major forces behind this movement has been the [[European Union]], which first certified [[organic food]] in 1991 and began reform of its [[Common Agricultural Policy]] (CAP) in 2005 to phase out commodity-linked farm subsidies,<ref>{{cite web |publisher=European Commission |year=2003 |url=http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/capreform/index_en.htm |title=CAP Reform |access-date=15 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101017124251/http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/capreform/index_en.htm |archive-date=17 October 2010}}</ref> also known as [[Decoupling and re-coupling|decoupling]]. The growth of organic farming has renewed research in alternative technologies such as [[integrated pest management]], selective breeding,<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Poincelot |first1=Raymond P. |title=Toward a More Sustainable Agriculture |chapter=Organic Farming |journal=Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture |pages=14–32 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4684-1506-3_2 |year=1986 |isbn=978-1-4684-1508-7 }}</ref> and [[controlled-environment agriculture]].<ref name=":1">{{Cite news |url=http://www.agweek.com/business/agriculture/4527042-cutting-edge-technology-will-change-farming |title=The cutting-edge technology that will change farming |work=Agweek |date=9 November 2018 |access-date=23 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181117020138/http://www.agweek.com/business/agriculture/4527042-cutting-edge-technology-will-change-farming |archive-date= | From the twentieth century, intensive agriculture increased productivity. It substituted synthetic fertilizers and pesticides for labour, but caused increased water pollution, and often involved farm subsidies. In recent years there has been a backlash against the [[environmental awareness|environmental effects]] of conventional agriculture, resulting in the [[organic farming|organic]], [[Regenerative agriculture|regenerative]], and [[sustainable agriculture]] movements.<ref name="motherjones1" /><ref>{{cite web |publisher=The World Bank |year=1995 |url=http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=469372&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000009265_3970311122936 |title=Overcoming agricultural pollution of water: the challenge of integrating agricultural and environmental policies in the European Union, Volume 1 |access-date=15 April 2013 |author=Scheierling, Susanne M. |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605112426/http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=469372&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000009265_3970311122936 |archive-date=5 June 2013}}</ref> One of the major forces behind this movement has been the [[European Union]], which first certified [[organic food]] in 1991 and began reform of its [[Common Agricultural Policy]] (CAP) in 2005 to phase out commodity-linked farm subsidies,<ref>{{cite web |publisher=European Commission |year=2003 |url=http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/capreform/index_en.htm |title=CAP Reform |access-date=15 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101017124251/http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/capreform/index_en.htm |archive-date=17 October 2010}}</ref> also known as [[Decoupling and re-coupling|decoupling]]. The growth of organic farming has renewed research in alternative technologies such as [[integrated pest management]], selective breeding,<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Poincelot |first1=Raymond P. |title=Toward a More Sustainable Agriculture |chapter=Organic Farming |journal=Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture |pages=14–32 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4684-1506-3_2 |year=1986 |isbn=978-1-4684-1508-7 }}</ref> and [[controlled-environment agriculture]].<ref name=":1">{{Cite news |url=http://www.agweek.com/business/agriculture/4527042-cutting-edge-technology-will-change-farming |title=The cutting-edge technology that will change farming |work=Agweek |date=9 November 2018 |access-date=23 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181117020138/http://www.agweek.com/business/agriculture/4527042-cutting-edge-technology-will-change-farming |archive-date=17 November 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |author=Charles, Dan |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/11/02/561462293/hydroponic-veggies-are-taking-over-organic-and-a-move-to-ban-them-fails |title=Hydroponic Veggies Are Taking Over Organic, And A Move To Ban Them Fails |work=[[NPR]] |date=3 November 2017 |access-date=24 November 2018}}</ref> Recent mainstream technological developments include [[genetically modified food]].<ref>[http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file15655.pdf GM Science Review First Report] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016100707/http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file15655.pdf |date=16 October 2013 }}, Prepared by the UK GM Science Review panel (July 2003). Chairman David King, p. 9</ref> Demand for non-food biofuel crops,<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Smith, Kate |author2=Edwards, Rob |date=8 March 2008 |url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/2008-the-year-of-global-food-crisis-1.828546 |title=2008: The year of global food crisis |journal=The Herald |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130411220739/http://www.heraldscotland.com/2008-the-year-of-global-food-crisis-1.828546 |archive-date=11 April 2013}}</ref> development of former farm lands, rising transportation costs, [[Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture|climate change]], growing consumer demand in China and India, and [[population growth]],<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0118/p08s01-comv.html |title=The global grain bubble |journal=The Christian Science Monitor |date=18 January 2008 |access-date=26 September 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091130063759/http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0118/p08s01-comv.html |archive-date=30 November 2009}}</ref> are threatening [[food security]] in many parts of the world.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7284196.stm |title=The cost of food: Facts and figures |publisher=BBC |date=16 October 2008 |access-date=26 September 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090120025945/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7284196.stm |archive-date=20 January 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |author=Walt, Vivienne |date=27 February 2008 |url=http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1717572,00.html |title=The World's Growing Food-Price Crisis |magazine=Time |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111129211855/http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1717572,00.html |archive-date=29 November 2011 }}</ref><ref name="guardian.co.uk">Watts, Jonathan (4 December 2007). [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/dec/04/china.business "Riots and hunger feared as demand for grain sends food costs soaring"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130901074034/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/dec/04/china.business |date=1 September 2013 }}, ''The Guardian'' (London).</ref><ref name="timesonline.co.uk">Mortished, Carl (7 March 2008).[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3500975.ece "Already we have riots, hoarding, panic: the sign of things to come?"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110814134028/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3500975.ece |date=14 August 2011}}, ''The Times'' (London).</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">Borger, Julian (26 February 2008). [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/feb/26/food.unitednations "Feed the world? We are fighting a losing battle, UN admits"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161225150554/https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/feb/26/food.unitednations |date=25 December 2016}}, ''The Guardian'' (London).</ref> The [[International Fund for Agricultural Development]] posits that an increase in [[smallholding|smallholder agriculture]] may be part of the solution to concerns about [[food prices]] and overall food security, given the favorable experience of Vietnam.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ifad.org/operations/food/farmer.htm |title=Food prices: smallholder farmers can be part of the solution |publisher=International Fund for Agricultural Development |access-date=24 April 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130505224355/http://www.ifad.org/operations/food/farmer.htm |archive-date=5 May 2013 }}</ref> [[soil retrogression and degradation|Soil degradation]] and diseases such as [[stem rust]] are major concerns globally;<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/rust/stem/rust-report/stem-ug99racettksk/en/ |title=Wheat Stem Rust – UG99 (Race TTKSK)|publisher=FAO|access-date=6 January 2014|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140107064545/http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/rust/stem/rust-report/stem-ug99racettksk/en/|archive-date=7 January 2014}}</ref> approximately 40% of the world's agricultural land is seriously degraded.<ref>Sample, Ian (31 August 2007). [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2007/aug/31/climatechange.food "Global food crisis looms as climate change and population growth strip fertile land"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160429094959/https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2007/aug/31/climatechange.food |date=29 April 2016}}, ''The Guardian'' (London).</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.mongabay.com/2006/1214-unu.html |title=Africa may be able to feed only 25% of its population by 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111127175559/http://news.mongabay.com/2006/1214-unu.html |archive-date=27 November 2011 |work=[[Mongabay]] |date=14 December 2006 |access-date=15 July 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> By 2015, the agricultural output of China was the largest in the world, followed by the European Union, India and the United States.<ref name=UNCTAD2017 /> Economists measure the [[total factor productivity]] of agriculture and by this measure agriculture in the United States is roughly 1.7 times more productive than it was in 1948.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=USDA Economic Research Service |url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/agproductivity/ |title=Agricultural Productivity in the United States |date=5 July 2012 |access-date=22 April 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130201021133/http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/AgProductivity/ |archive-date=1 February 2013 }}</ref> | ||
=== Workforce === | === Workforce === | ||
Line 78: | Line 84: | ||
{{Main|Agricultural safety and health}} | {{Main|Agricultural safety and health}} | ||
Agriculture, specifically farming, remains a hazardous industry, and farmers worldwide remain at high risk of work-related injuries, lung disease, [[noise-induced hearing loss]], skin diseases, as well as certain cancers related to chemical use and prolonged sun exposure. On [[industrial agriculture|industrialized farms]], injuries frequently involve the use of [[agricultural machinery]], and a common cause of fatal agricultural injuries in developed countries is [[Rollover protection structure|tractor rollovers]].<ref name="aginjury">{{cite web |url=https://wwwa.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/aginjury/ |title=NIOSH Workplace Safety & Health Topic: Agricultural Injuries |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |access-date=16 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071028181205/http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/aginjury/ |archive-date=28 October 2007}}</ref> Pesticides and other chemicals used in farming can be [[Health effects of pesticides|hazardous to worker health]], and workers exposed to pesticides may experience illness or have children with birth defects.<ref name=NIOSH_pest>{{Cite journal |url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-108/ |title=NIOSH Pesticide Poisoning Monitoring Program Protects Farmworkers |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |access-date=15 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130402004253/http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012%2D108/ |archive-date=2 April 2013|doi=10.26616/NIOSHPUB2012108 |year=2011 |doi-access=free }}</ref> As an industry in which families commonly share in work and live on the farm itself, entire families can be at risk for injuries, illness, and death.<ref name="NIOSH Agri">{{cite web |url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/agriculture/ |title=NIOSH Workplace Safety & Health Topic: Agriculture |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |access-date=16 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071009224012/http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/agriculture/ |archive-date=9 October 2007 }}</ref> Ages 0–6 May be an especially vulnerable population in agriculture;<ref name=WeicheltGorucu2018>{{Cite journal |last1=Weichelt |first1=Bryan |last2=Gorucu |first2=Serap |date=17 February 2018 |title=Supplemental surveillance: a review of 2015 and 2016 agricultural injury data from news reports on AgInjuryNews.org |url=http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/early/2018/02/16/injuryprev-2017-042671 |journal=Injury Prevention |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=injuryprev–2017–042671 |doi=10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042671 |pmid=29386372|s2cid=3371442 }}</ref> common causes of fatal injuries among young farm workers include drowning, machinery and motor accidents, including with all-terrain vehicles.<ref name="NIOSH Agri" /><ref name=WeicheltGorucu2018 /><ref>{{Cite journal |author=The PLOS ONE staff |date=6 September 2018 |title=Correction: Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=13 |issue=9 |pages=e0203842 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0203842 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=6126865 |pmid=30188948 |bibcode=2018PLoSO..1303842. }}</ref> | Agriculture, specifically farming, remains a hazardous industry, and farmers worldwide remain at high risk of work-related injuries, lung disease, [[noise-induced hearing loss]], skin diseases, as well as certain cancers related to chemical use and prolonged sun exposure. On [[industrial agriculture|industrialized farms]], injuries frequently involve the use of [[agricultural machinery]], and a common cause of fatal agricultural injuries in developed countries is [[Rollover protection structure|tractor rollovers]].<ref name="aginjury">{{cite web |url=https://wwwa.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/aginjury/ |title=NIOSH Workplace Safety & Health Topic: Agricultural Injuries |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |access-date=16 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071028181205/http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/aginjury/ |archive-date=28 October 2007}}</ref> Pesticides and other chemicals used in farming can be [[Health effects of pesticides|hazardous to worker health]], and workers exposed to pesticides may experience illness or have children with birth defects.<ref name=NIOSH_pest>{{Cite journal |url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-108/ |title=NIOSH Pesticide Poisoning Monitoring Program Protects Farmworkers |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |access-date=15 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130402004253/http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012%2D108/ |archive-date=2 April 2013|doi=10.26616/NIOSHPUB2012108 |year=2011 |doi-access=free }}</ref> As an industry in which families commonly share in work and live on the farm itself, entire families can be at risk for injuries, illness, and death.<ref name="NIOSH Agri">{{cite web |url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/agriculture/ |title=NIOSH Workplace Safety & Health Topic: Agriculture |publisher=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |access-date=16 April 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071009224012/http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/agriculture/ |archive-date=9 October 2007 }}</ref> Ages 0–6 May be an especially vulnerable population in agriculture;<ref name=WeicheltGorucu2018>{{Cite journal |last1=Weichelt |first1=Bryan |last2=Gorucu |first2=Serap |date=17 February 2018 |title=Supplemental surveillance: a review of 2015 and 2016 agricultural injury data from news reports on AgInjuryNews.org |url=http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/early/2018/02/16/injuryprev-2017-042671 |journal=Injury Prevention |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=injuryprev–2017–042671 |doi=10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042671 |pmid=29386372|s2cid=3371442 }}</ref> common causes of fatal injuries among young farm workers include drowning, machinery and motor accidents, including with all-terrain vehicles.<ref name="NIOSH Agri" /><ref name=WeicheltGorucu2018 /><ref>{{Cite journal |author=The PLOS ONE staff |date=6 September 2018 |title=Correction: Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=13 |issue=9 |pages=e0203842 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0203842 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=6126865 |pmid=30188948 |bibcode=2018PLoSO..1303842. |doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
The [[International Labour Organization]] considers agriculture "one of the most hazardous of all economic sectors".<ref name=ILO>{{cite web |url=http://www.ilo.org/safework/info/standards-and-instruments/codes/WCMS_161135/lang--en/index.htm |title=Safety and health in agriculture |publisher=International Labour Organization |access-date=1 April 2018 |date=21 March 2011}}</ref> It estimates that the annual work-related death toll among agricultural employees is at least 170,000, twice the average rate of other jobs. In addition, incidences of death, injury and illness related to agricultural activities often go unreported.<ref name=ILO2>{{cite web |url=http://www.ilo.org/safework/areasofwork/hazardous-work/WCMS_356550/lang--en/index.htm |title=Agriculture: A hazardous work |publisher=International Labour Organization |access-date=1 April 2018 |date=15 June 2009 }}</ref> The organization has developed the [[Safety and Health in Agriculture Convention, 2001]], which covers the range of risks in the agriculture occupation, the prevention of these risks and the role that individuals and organizations engaged in agriculture should play.<ref name=ILO /> | The [[International Labour Organization]] considers agriculture "one of the most hazardous of all economic sectors".<ref name=ILO>{{cite web |url=http://www.ilo.org/safework/info/standards-and-instruments/codes/WCMS_161135/lang--en/index.htm |title=Safety and health in agriculture |publisher=International Labour Organization |access-date=1 April 2018 |date=21 March 2011}}</ref> It estimates that the annual work-related death toll among agricultural employees is at least 170,000, twice the average rate of other jobs. In addition, incidences of death, injury and illness related to agricultural activities often go unreported.<ref name=ILO2>{{cite web |url=http://www.ilo.org/safework/areasofwork/hazardous-work/WCMS_356550/lang--en/index.htm |title=Agriculture: A hazardous work |publisher=International Labour Organization |access-date=1 April 2018 |date=15 June 2009 }}</ref> The organization has developed the [[Safety and Health in Agriculture Convention, 2001]], which covers the range of risks in the agriculture occupation, the prevention of these risks and the role that individuals and organizations engaged in agriculture should play.<ref name=ILO /> | ||
Line 157: | Line 163: | ||
Further industrialization led to the use of [[monoculture]]s, when one [[cultivar]] is planted on a large acreage. Because of the low [[biodiversity]], nutrient use is uniform and pests tend to build up, necessitating the greater use of [[pesticide]]s and fertilizers.<ref name="PCP APS" /> [[Multiple cropping]], in which several crops are grown sequentially in one year, and [[intercropping]], when several crops are grown at the same time, are other kinds of annual cropping systems known as [[polyculture]]s.<ref name="CS" /> | Further industrialization led to the use of [[monoculture]]s, when one [[cultivar]] is planted on a large acreage. Because of the low [[biodiversity]], nutrient use is uniform and pests tend to build up, necessitating the greater use of [[pesticide]]s and fertilizers.<ref name="PCP APS" /> [[Multiple cropping]], in which several crops are grown sequentially in one year, and [[intercropping]], when several crops are grown at the same time, are other kinds of annual cropping systems known as [[polyculture]]s.<ref name="CS" /> | ||
In [[subtropics|subtropical]] and [[arid]] environments, the timing and extent of agriculture may be limited by rainfall, either not allowing multiple annual crops in a year, or requiring irrigation. In all of these environments perennial crops are grown (coffee, chocolate) and systems are practiced such as agroforestry. In [[Temperateness|temperate]] environments, where ecosystems were predominantly [[grassland]] or [[prairie]], highly productive annual farming is the dominant agricultural system.<ref name="CS" /> | In [[subtropics|subtropical]] and [[arid]] environments, the timing and extent of agriculture may be limited by rainfall, either not allowing multiple annual crops in a year, or requiring irrigation. In all of these environments perennial crops are grown ([[coffee]], [[chocolate]]) and systems are practiced such as agroforestry. In [[Temperateness|temperate]] environments, where ecosystems were predominantly [[grassland]] or [[prairie]], highly productive annual farming is the dominant agricultural system.<ref name="CS" /> | ||
Important categories of food crops include cereals, legumes, forage, fruits and vegetables.<ref name="FAO" /> [[Natural fiber]]s include cotton, [[wool]], [[hemp]], silk and [[flax]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Profiles of 15 of the world's major plant and animal fibres|url=http://www.fao.org/natural-fibres-2009/about/15-natural-fibres/en/|publisher=FAO|access-date=26 March 2018|date=2009}}</ref> Specific crops are cultivated in distinct [[growing region]]s throughout the world. Production is listed in millions of metric tons, based on [[Food and Agriculture Organization|FAO]] estimates.<ref name="FAO" /> | Important categories of food crops include cereals, legumes, forage, fruits and vegetables.<ref name="FAO" /> [[Natural fiber]]s include cotton, [[wool]], [[hemp]], silk and [[flax]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Profiles of 15 of the world's major plant and animal fibres|url=http://www.fao.org/natural-fibres-2009/about/15-natural-fibres/en/|publisher=FAO|access-date=26 March 2018|date=2009}}</ref> Specific crops are cultivated in distinct [[growing region]]s throughout the world. Production is listed in millions of metric tons, based on [[Food and Agriculture Organization|FAO]] estimates.<ref name="FAO" /> | ||
Line 224: | Line 230: | ||
Animal husbandry is the breeding and raising of animals for meat, milk, [[egg (food)|eggs]], or [[wool]], and for work and transport.<ref name=Clutton-Brock>{{cite book |author=Clutton-Brock, Juliet |title=A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=cgL-EbbB8a0C|page=1}} |year=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-63495-3 |pages=1–2}}</ref> [[Working animal]]s, including horses, [[mule]]s, [[ox]]en, [[water buffalo]], camels, llamas, alpacas, donkeys, and dogs, have for centuries been used to help cultivate fields, [[harvest]] crops, wrangle other animals, and transport farm products to buyers.<ref>{{cite book |last=Falvey |first=John Lindsay |author-link=Lindsay Falvey |year=1985 |title=Introduction to Working Animals |isbn=978-1-86252-992-2 |location=Melbourne, Australia |publisher=MPW Australia}}</ref> | Animal husbandry is the breeding and raising of animals for meat, milk, [[egg (food)|eggs]], or [[wool]], and for work and transport.<ref name=Clutton-Brock>{{cite book |author=Clutton-Brock, Juliet |title=A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=cgL-EbbB8a0C|page=1}} |year=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-63495-3 |pages=1–2}}</ref> [[Working animal]]s, including horses, [[mule]]s, [[ox]]en, [[water buffalo]], camels, llamas, alpacas, donkeys, and dogs, have for centuries been used to help cultivate fields, [[harvest]] crops, wrangle other animals, and transport farm products to buyers.<ref>{{cite book |last=Falvey |first=John Lindsay |author-link=Lindsay Falvey |year=1985 |title=Introduction to Working Animals |isbn=978-1-86252-992-2 |location=Melbourne, Australia |publisher=MPW Australia}}</ref> | ||
Livestock production systems can be defined based on feed source, as grassland-based, mixed, and landless.<ref name="FAO lps">{{cite web |author1=Sere, C. |author2=Steinfeld, H. |author3=Groeneweld, J. |year=1995 |url=http://www.fao.org/WAIRDOCS/LEAD/X6101E/x6101e00.htm#Contents|title=Description of Systems in World Livestock Systems – Current status issues and trends |publisher=U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization |access-date=8 September 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121026004040/http://www.fao.org/WAIRDOCS/LEAD/X6101E/X6101E00.HTM#Contents |archive-date=26 October 2012 }}</ref> {{as of|2010}}, 30% of Earth's ice- and water-free area was used for producing livestock, with the sector employing approximately 1.3 billion people. Between the 1960s and the 2000s, there was a significant increase in livestock production, both by numbers and by carcass weight, especially among beef, pigs and chickens, the latter of which had production increased by almost a factor of 10. Non-meat animals, such as milk cows and egg-producing chickens, also showed significant production increases. Global cattle, sheep and goat populations are expected to continue to increase sharply through 2050.<ref name=LP>{{cite journal |title=Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects |author=Thornton, Philip K. |doi=10.1098/rstb.2010.0134 |pmid=20713389 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B |date=27 September 2010 |volume=365 |issue=1554 |pages=2853–2867 |doi-access=free |pmc=2935116 }}</ref> [[Aquaculture]] or fish farming, the production of fish for human consumption in confined operations, is one of the fastest growing sectors of food production, growing at an average of 9% a year between 1975 and 2007.<ref>{{cite | Livestock production systems can be defined based on feed source, as grassland-based, mixed, and landless.<ref name="FAO lps">{{cite web |author1=Sere, C. |author2=Steinfeld, H. |author3=Groeneweld, J. |year=1995 |url=http://www.fao.org/WAIRDOCS/LEAD/X6101E/x6101e00.htm#Contents|title=Description of Systems in World Livestock Systems – Current status issues and trends |publisher=U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization |access-date=8 September 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121026004040/http://www.fao.org/WAIRDOCS/LEAD/X6101E/X6101E00.HTM#Contents |archive-date=26 October 2012 }}</ref> {{as of|2010}}, 30% of Earth's ice- and water-free area was used for producing livestock, with the sector employing approximately 1.3 billion people. Between the 1960s and the 2000s, there was a significant increase in livestock production, both by numbers and by carcass weight, especially among beef, pigs and chickens, the latter of which had production increased by almost a factor of 10. Non-meat animals, such as milk cows and egg-producing chickens, also showed significant production increases. Global cattle, sheep and goat populations are expected to continue to increase sharply through 2050.<ref name=LP>{{cite journal |title=Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects |author=Thornton, Philip K. |doi=10.1098/rstb.2010.0134 |pmid=20713389 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B |date=27 September 2010 |volume=365 |issue=1554 |pages=2853–2867 |doi-access=free |pmc=2935116 }}</ref> [[Aquaculture]] or fish farming, the production of fish for human consumption in confined operations, is one of the fastest growing sectors of food production, growing at an average of 9% a year between 1975 and 2007.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1663604,00.html |title=Fish Farming's Growing Dangers |magazine=Time |author=Stier, Ken |date=19 September 2007|url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130907071708/http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1663604,00.html |archive-date=7 September 2013 }}</ref> | ||
During the second half of the 20th century, producers using selective breeding focused on creating livestock [[breed]]s and [[crossbreed]]s that increased production, while mostly disregarding the need to preserve [[genetic diversity]]. This trend has led to a significant decrease in genetic diversity and resources among livestock breeds, leading to a corresponding decrease in disease resistance and local adaptations previously found among traditional breeds.<ref>{{cite journal |title=A global view of livestock biodiversity and conservation – Globaldiv |author=Ajmone-Marsan, P. |journal=Animal Genetics |date=May 2010 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02036.x |pmid=20500752 |volume=41 |issue=supplement S1 |pages=1–5 |url=http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/148417 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170803140941/https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/148417 |archive-date=3 August 2017 }}</ref> | During the second half of the 20th century, producers using selective breeding focused on creating livestock [[breed]]s and [[crossbreed]]s that increased production, while mostly disregarding the need to preserve [[genetic diversity]]. This trend has led to a significant decrease in genetic diversity and resources among livestock breeds, leading to a corresponding decrease in disease resistance and local adaptations previously found among traditional breeds.<ref>{{cite journal |title=A global view of livestock biodiversity and conservation – Globaldiv |author=Ajmone-Marsan, P. |journal=Animal Genetics |date=May 2010 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02036.x |pmid=20500752 |volume=41 |issue=supplement S1 |pages=1–5 |url=http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/148417 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170803140941/https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/148417 |archive-date=3 August 2017 }}</ref> | ||
Line 242: | Line 248: | ||
Pest control includes the management of weeds, insects, [[mite]]s, and diseases. Chemical (pesticides), biological ([[biocontrol]]), mechanical (tillage), and cultural practices are used. Cultural practices include crop rotation, [[culling]], [[cover crop]]s, intercropping, [[compost]]ing, avoidance, and [[Disease resistance in fruit and vegetables|resistance]]. Integrated pest management attempts to use all of these methods to keep pest populations below the number which would cause economic loss, and recommends pesticides as a last resort.<ref name="PCP Pest">"Pesticide Use in U.S. Crop Production", pp. 240–282 in [[#Acquaah|Acquaah]]</ref> | Pest control includes the management of weeds, insects, [[mite]]s, and diseases. Chemical (pesticides), biological ([[biocontrol]]), mechanical (tillage), and cultural practices are used. Cultural practices include crop rotation, [[culling]], [[cover crop]]s, intercropping, [[compost]]ing, avoidance, and [[Disease resistance in fruit and vegetables|resistance]]. Integrated pest management attempts to use all of these methods to keep pest populations below the number which would cause economic loss, and recommends pesticides as a last resort.<ref name="PCP Pest">"Pesticide Use in U.S. Crop Production", pp. 240–282 in [[#Acquaah|Acquaah]]</ref> | ||
[[Nutrient management]] includes both the source of nutrient inputs for crop and livestock production, and the method of use of manure produced by livestock. Nutrient inputs can be chemical inorganic fertilizers, manure, [[green manure]], compost and minerals.<ref name="PCP Soil">"Soil and Land", pp. 165–210 in [[#Acquaah|Acquaah]]</ref> Crop nutrient use may also be managed using cultural techniques such as crop rotation or a [[fallow]] period. Manure is used either by holding livestock where the feed crop is growing, such as in managed intensive rotational grazing, or [[Manure spreader|by spreading]] either dry or liquid formulations of manure on cropland or [[pasture]]s. | [[Nutrient management]] includes both the source of nutrient inputs for crop and livestock production, and the method of use of manure produced by livestock. Nutrient inputs can be chemical inorganic fertilizers, manure, [[green manure]], compost and minerals.<ref name="PCP Soil">"Soil and Land", pp. 165–210 in [[#Acquaah|Acquaah]]</ref> Crop nutrient use may also be managed using cultural techniques such as crop rotation or a [[fallow]] period. Manure is used either by holding livestock where the feed crop is growing, such as in managed intensive rotational grazing, or [[Manure spreader|by spreading]] either dry or liquid formulations of manure on cropland or [[pasture]]s.<ref name="Soil nutrient">Brady, N. C.; Weil, R. R. (2002). "Practical Nutrient Management" pp. 472–515 in ''Elements of the Nature and Properties of Soils''. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. {{ISBN|978-0135051955}}</ref><ref name="CS nutrient">"Nutrition from the Soil", pp. 187–218 in [[#Chrispeels|Chrispeels]]</ref> | ||
[[File:PivotWithDrops.JPG|thumb|A [[center pivot irrigation]] system]] | [[File:PivotWithDrops.JPG|thumb|A [[center pivot irrigation]] system]] | ||
Line 251: | Line 257: | ||
[[Payment for ecosystem services]] is a method of providing additional incentives to encourage farmers to conserve some aspects of the environment. Measures might include paying for reforestation upstream of a city, to improve the supply of fresh water.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Tacconi |first1=L. |year=2012 |title=Redefining payments for environmental services |journal=Ecological Economics |volume=73 |issue=1|pages=29–36 |doi=10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028}}</ref> | [[Payment for ecosystem services]] is a method of providing additional incentives to encourage farmers to conserve some aspects of the environment. Measures might include paying for reforestation upstream of a city, to improve the supply of fresh water.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Tacconi |first1=L. |year=2012 |title=Redefining payments for environmental services |journal=Ecological Economics |volume=73 |issue=1|pages=29–36 |doi=10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028}}</ref> | ||
=== Effects of climate change on yields === | |||
{{Main|Effects of climate change on agriculture}} | |||
[[File:Winnowing The Grain, Axum, Ethiopia (Detail) (3157508890).jpg|thumb|left|[[Winnowing]] grain: [[global warming]] will probably harm crop yields in low latitude countries like Ethiopia.]][[Climate change]] and agriculture are interrelated on a global scale. [[Effects of climate change on agriculture|Global warming affects agriculture]] through changes in [[instrumental temperature record|average temperatures]], rainfall, and [[extreme weather|weather extremes]] (like storms and heat waves); changes in pests and diseases; changes in atmospheric [[carbon dioxide]] and ground-level [[ozone]] concentrations; changes in the nutritional quality of some foods;<ref name="science-news">{{cite news |last=Milius |first=Susan |date=13 December 2017 |title=Worries grow that climate change will quietly steal nutrients from major food crops |work=[[Science News]] |url=https://www.sciencenews.org/article/nutrition-climate-change-top-science-stories-2017-yir |access-date=21 January 2018}}</ref> and changes in [[current sea level rise|sea level]].<ref>Hoffmann, U., Section B: Agriculture – a key driver and a major victim of global warming, in: Lead Article, in: Chapter 1, in {{cite book |url=http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=666 |title=Trade and Environment Review 2013: Wake up before it is too late: Make agriculture truly sustainable now for food security in a changing climate |publisher=United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) |year=2013 |editor=Hoffmann, U. |location=Geneva, Switzerland |pages=3, 5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141128140551/http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=666 |archive-date=28 November 2014}}</ref> Global warming is already affecting agriculture, with effects unevenly distributed across the world.<ref name="porter summary">Porter, J. R., ''et al.''., Executive summary, in: [http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap7_FINAL.pdf Chapter 7: Food security and food production systems] (archived [https://web.archive.org/web/20141105164634/https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap7_FINAL.pdf 5 November 2014]), in {{cite book |author=IPCC AR5 WG2 A |url=http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/ |title=Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II (WG2) to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2014 |editor=Field, C. B. |pages=488–489 |display-editors=etal}}</ref> Future climate change will probably negatively affect [[crop yield|crop production]] in [[low latitude]] countries, while effects in northern [[latitude]]s may be positive or negative.<ref name="porter summary" /> Global warming will probably increase the risk of [[food insecurity]] for some vulnerable groups, such as the [[poverty|poor]].<ref>Paragraph 4, in: Summary and Recommendations, in: {{cite book |author=HLPE |url=http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/reports/hlpe-food-security-and-climate-change-report-elaboration-process/en/ |title=Food security and climate change. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security |date=June 2012 |publisher=Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |location=Rome, Italy |page=12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141212075812/http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/reports/hlpe-food-security-and-climate-change-report-elaboration-process/en/ |archive-date=12 December 2014}}</ref> | |||
== Crop alteration and biotechnology == | == Crop alteration and biotechnology == | ||
Line 260: | Line 270: | ||
Crop alteration has been practiced by humankind for thousands of years, since the beginning of civilization. Altering crops through breeding practices changes the genetic make-up of a plant to develop crops with more beneficial characteristics for humans, for example, larger fruits or seeds, drought-tolerance, or resistance to pests. Significant advances in plant breeding ensued after the work of geneticist [[Gregor Mendel]]. His work on [[dominant allele|dominant]] and [[recessive allele]]s, although initially largely ignored for almost 50 years, gave plant breeders a better understanding of genetics and breeding techniques. Crop breeding includes techniques such as plant selection with desirable traits, [[self-pollination]] and [[cross-pollination]], and molecular techniques that genetically modify the organism.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cls.casa.colostate.edu/TransgenicCrops/history.html |title=History of Plant Breeding |date=29 January 2004 |publisher=Colorado State University |access-date=11 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121061931/http://cls.casa.colostate.edu/TransgenicCrops/history.html |archive-date=21 January 2013 }}</ref> | Crop alteration has been practiced by humankind for thousands of years, since the beginning of civilization. Altering crops through breeding practices changes the genetic make-up of a plant to develop crops with more beneficial characteristics for humans, for example, larger fruits or seeds, drought-tolerance, or resistance to pests. Significant advances in plant breeding ensued after the work of geneticist [[Gregor Mendel]]. His work on [[dominant allele|dominant]] and [[recessive allele]]s, although initially largely ignored for almost 50 years, gave plant breeders a better understanding of genetics and breeding techniques. Crop breeding includes techniques such as plant selection with desirable traits, [[self-pollination]] and [[cross-pollination]], and molecular techniques that genetically modify the organism.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cls.casa.colostate.edu/TransgenicCrops/history.html |title=History of Plant Breeding |date=29 January 2004 |publisher=Colorado State University |access-date=11 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121061931/http://cls.casa.colostate.edu/TransgenicCrops/history.html |archive-date=21 January 2013 }}</ref> | ||
Domestication of plants has, over the centuries increased yield, improved disease resistance and [[drought tolerance]], eased harvest and improved the taste and nutritional value of crop plants. Careful selection and breeding have had enormous effects on the characteristics of crop plants. Plant selection and breeding in the 1920s and 1930s improved pasture (grasses and clover) in New Zealand. Extensive X-ray and ultraviolet induced mutagenesis efforts (i.e. primitive genetic engineering) during the 1950s produced the modern commercial varieties of grains such as wheat, corn (maize) and barley.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Stadler |first=L. J. |author-link=Lewis Stadler |author2=Sprague, G.F. |title=Genetic Effects of Ultra-Violet Radiation in Maize: I. Unfiltered Radiation |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |volume=22 |issue=10 |pages=572–578 |date=15 October 1936 |url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/22/10/579.pdf |doi=10.1073/pnas.22.10.572 |access-date=11 October 2007 |pmid=16588111 |pmc=1076819 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024233407/http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/22/10/579.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2007 |url-status=live |bibcode=1936PNAS...22..572S }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Berg |first=Paul |author2=Singer, Maxine |title=George Beadle: An Uncommon Farmer. The Emergence of Genetics in the 20th century |url=https://archive.org/details/georgebeadleunco0000berg |url-access=registration |publisher=Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press |date=15 August 2003 |isbn=978-0-87969-688-7 }}</ref> | Domestication of plants has, over the centuries increased yield, improved disease resistance and [[drought tolerance]], eased harvest and improved the taste and nutritional value of crop plants. Careful selection and breeding have had enormous effects on the characteristics of crop plants. Plant selection and breeding in the 1920s and 1930s improved pasture (grasses and clover) in New Zealand. Extensive X-ray and ultraviolet induced mutagenesis efforts (i.e. primitive genetic engineering) during the 1950s produced the modern commercial varieties of grains such as wheat, corn (maize) and barley.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Stadler |first=L. J. |author-link=Lewis Stadler |author2=Sprague, G.F. |title=Genetic Effects of Ultra-Violet Radiation in Maize: I. Unfiltered Radiation |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |volume=22 |issue=10 |pages=572–578 |date=15 October 1936 |url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/22/10/579.pdf |doi=10.1073/pnas.22.10.572 |access-date=11 October 2007 |pmid=16588111 |pmc=1076819 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024233407/http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/22/10/579.pdf |archive-date=24 October 2007 |url-status=live |bibcode=1936PNAS...22..572S |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Berg |first=Paul |author2=Singer, Maxine |title=George Beadle: An Uncommon Farmer. The Emergence of Genetics in the 20th century |url=https://archive.org/details/georgebeadleunco0000berg |url-access=registration |publisher=Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press |date=15 August 2003 |isbn=978-0-87969-688-7 }}</ref> | ||
[[File:Seedlings in Green House.jpg|thumb|Seedlings in a green house. This is what it looks like when seedlings are growing from plant breeding.]] | |||
The [[Green Revolution]] popularized the use of conventional [[Hybrid (biology)|hybridization]] to sharply increase yield by creating "high-yielding varieties". For example, average yields of corn (maize) in the US have increased from around 2.5 tons per hectare (t/ha) (40 bushels per acre) in 1900 to about 9.4 t/ha (150 bushels per acre) in 2001. Similarly, worldwide average wheat yields have increased from less than 1 t/ha in 1900 to more than 2.5 t/ha in 1990. South American average wheat yields are around 2 t/ha, African under 1 t/ha, and Egypt and Arabia up to 3.5 to 4 t/ha with irrigation. In contrast, the average wheat yield in countries such as France is over 8 t/ha. Variations in yields are due mainly to variation in climate, genetics, and the level of intensive farming techniques (use of fertilizers, chemical pest control, growth control to avoid lodging).<ref>{{cite journal |last=Ruttan |first=Vernon W. |title=Biotechnology and Agriculture: A Skeptical Perspective |journal=AgBioForum |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=54–60 |date=December 1999 |url=http://www.agbioforum.org/v2n1/v2n1a10-ruttan.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521021149/http://www.agbioforum.org/v2n1/v2n1a10-ruttan.pdf |archive-date=21 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Cassman |first=K. |title=Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: The Challenge of increasing crop yield potential and precision agriculture |journal=Proceedings of a National Academy of Sciences Colloquium, Irvine, California |date=5 December 1998 |url=http://www.lsc.psu.edu/nas/Speakers/Cassman%20manuscript.html |access-date=11 October 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024001804/http://www.lsc.psu.edu/nas/Speakers/Cassman%20manuscript.html |archive-date=24 October 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>Conversion note: 1 bushel of wheat=60 pounds (lb) ≈ 27.215 kg. 1 bushel of maize=56 pounds ≈ 25.401 kg</ref> | The [[Green Revolution]] popularized the use of conventional [[Hybrid (biology)|hybridization]] to sharply increase yield by creating "high-yielding varieties". For example, average yields of corn (maize) in the US have increased from around 2.5 tons per hectare (t/ha) (40 bushels per acre) in 1900 to about 9.4 t/ha (150 bushels per acre) in 2001. Similarly, worldwide average wheat yields have increased from less than 1 t/ha in 1900 to more than 2.5 t/ha in 1990. South American average wheat yields are around 2 t/ha, African under 1 t/ha, and Egypt and Arabia up to 3.5 to 4 t/ha with irrigation. In contrast, the average wheat yield in countries such as France is over 8 t/ha. Variations in yields are due mainly to variation in climate, genetics, and the level of intensive farming techniques (use of fertilizers, chemical pest control, growth control to avoid lodging).<ref>{{cite journal |last=Ruttan |first=Vernon W. |title=Biotechnology and Agriculture: A Skeptical Perspective |journal=AgBioForum |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=54–60 |date=December 1999 |url=http://www.agbioforum.org/v2n1/v2n1a10-ruttan.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521021149/http://www.agbioforum.org/v2n1/v2n1a10-ruttan.pdf |archive-date=21 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Cassman |first=K. |title=Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: The Challenge of increasing crop yield potential and precision agriculture |journal=Proceedings of a National Academy of Sciences Colloquium, Irvine, California |date=5 December 1998 |url=http://www.lsc.psu.edu/nas/Speakers/Cassman%20manuscript.html |access-date=11 October 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024001804/http://www.lsc.psu.edu/nas/Speakers/Cassman%20manuscript.html |archive-date=24 October 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>Conversion note: 1 bushel of wheat=60 pounds (lb) ≈ 27.215 kg. 1 bushel of maize=56 pounds ≈ 25.401 kg</ref> | ||
Line 283: | Line 293: | ||
[[File:Water pollution in the Wairarapa.JPG|upright|thumb|left|[[Water pollution]] in a rural stream due to [[Agricultural pollution in New Zealand|runoff from farming activity in New Zealand]]]] | [[File:Water pollution in the Wairarapa.JPG|upright|thumb|left|[[Water pollution]] in a rural stream due to [[Agricultural pollution in New Zealand|runoff from farming activity in New Zealand]]]] | ||
Agriculture is both a cause of and sensitive to [[environmental degradation]], such as [[biodiversity loss]], [[desertification]], [[soil degradation]] and [[ | Agriculture is both a cause of and sensitive to [[environmental degradation]], such as [[biodiversity loss]], [[desertification]], [[soil degradation]] and [[Effects of climate change on agriculture|global warming]], which cause decrease in crop yield.<ref>{{cite web |title=Making Peace with Nature: A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies |year=2021 |publisher=United Nations Environment Programme |url=https://www.unep.org/resources/making-peace-nature |access-date=9 June 2021}}</ref> Agriculture is one of the most important drivers of environmental pressures, particularly habitat change, climate change, water use and toxic emissions. Agriculture is the main source of toxins released into the environment, including insecticides, especially those used on cotton.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Publications/PriorityProducts/tabid/56053/Default.aspx |title=Priority products and materials: assessing the environmental impacts of consumption and production |author=International Resource Panel |publisher=United Nations Environment Programme |year=2010 |access-date=7 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121224061455/http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Publications/PriorityProducts/tabid/56053/Default.aspx |archive-date=24 December 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Frouz |first1=Jan |last2=Frouzová |first2=Jaroslava |date=2022 |title=Applied Ecology |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-83225-4 |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-83225-4 |pages= |isbn=978-3-030-83224-7 |s2cid=245009867 }}</ref>{{page needed|date=December 2021}} The 2011 UNEP Green Economy report stated that agricultural operations produced some 13 per cent of anthropogenic global greenhouse gas emissions. This includes gases from the use of inorganic fertilizers, agro-chemical pesticides, and herbicides, as well as fossil fuel-energy inputs.<ref name="unep.org">{{cite web |title=Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication |publisher=UNEP |year=2011 |url=https://www.unenvironment.org/search/node?keys=Towards+a+Green+Economy%3A+Pathways+to+Sustainable+Development+and+Poverty+Eradication |access-date=9 June 2021}}</ref> | ||
Agriculture imposes multiple external costs upon society through effects such as pesticide damage to nature (especially herbicides and insecticides), nutrient runoff, excessive water usage, and loss of natural environment. A 2000 assessment of agriculture in the UK determined total external costs for 1996 of £2,343 million, or £208 per hectare.<ref name=Pretty2000>{{cite journal |last1=Pretty |year=2000 |title=An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture |journal=Agricultural Systems |volume=65 |issue=2 |pages=113–136 |doi=10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00031-7 |first1=J. |display-authors=1 |last2=Brett |first2=C. |last3=Gee |first3=D. |last4=Hine |first4=R. E. |last5=Mason |first5=C. F. |last6=Morison |first6=J. I. L. |last7=Raven |first7=H. |last8=Rayment |first8=M. D. |last9=Van Der Bijl |first9=G. |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222549141 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170113233847/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222549141 |archive-date=13 January 2017}}</ref> A 2005 analysis of these costs in the US concluded that cropland imposes approximately $5 to $16 billion ($30 to $96 per hectare), while livestock production imposes $714 million.<ref name=Tegtmeier2005>{{cite journal |last1=Tegtmeier |first1=E. M. |last2=Duffy |first2=M. |year=2005 |title=External Costs of Agricultural Production in the United States |journal=The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Agriculture |url=http://www.organicvalley.coop/fileadmin/pdf/ag_costs_IJAS2004.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090205134016/http://www.organicvalley.coop/fileadmin/pdf/ag_costs_IJAS2004.pdf |archive-date=5 February 2009}}</ref> Both studies, which focused solely on the fiscal impacts, concluded that more should be done to internalize external costs. Neither included subsidies in their analysis, but they noted that subsidies also influence the cost of agriculture to society.<ref name=Pretty2000 /><ref name=Tegtmeier2005 /> | Agriculture imposes multiple external costs upon society through effects such as pesticide damage to nature (especially herbicides and insecticides), nutrient runoff, excessive water usage, and loss of natural environment. A 2000 assessment of agriculture in the UK determined total external costs for 1996 of £2,343 million, or £208 per hectare.<ref name=Pretty2000>{{cite journal |last1=Pretty |year=2000 |title=An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture |journal=Agricultural Systems |volume=65 |issue=2 |pages=113–136 |doi=10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00031-7 |first1=J. |display-authors=1 |last2=Brett |first2=C. |last3=Gee |first3=D. |last4=Hine |first4=R. E. |last5=Mason |first5=C. F. |last6=Morison |first6=J. I. L. |last7=Raven |first7=H. |last8=Rayment |first8=M. D. |last9=Van Der Bijl |first9=G. |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222549141 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170113233847/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222549141 |archive-date=13 January 2017}}</ref> A 2005 analysis of these costs in the US concluded that cropland imposes approximately $5 to $16 billion ($30 to $96 per hectare), while livestock production imposes $714 million.<ref name=Tegtmeier2005>{{cite journal |last1=Tegtmeier |first1=E. M. |last2=Duffy |first2=M. |year=2005 |title=External Costs of Agricultural Production in the United States |journal=The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Agriculture |url=http://www.organicvalley.coop/fileadmin/pdf/ag_costs_IJAS2004.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090205134016/http://www.organicvalley.coop/fileadmin/pdf/ag_costs_IJAS2004.pdf |archive-date=5 February 2009}}</ref> Both studies, which focused solely on the fiscal impacts, concluded that more should be done to internalize external costs. Neither included subsidies in their analysis, but they noted that subsidies also influence the cost of agriculture to society.<ref name=Pretty2000 /><ref name=Tegtmeier2005 /> | ||
Line 292: | Line 302: | ||
[[File:Biogas.jpg|thumb|Farmyard [[anaerobic digester]] converts waste plant material and manure from livestock into [[biogas]] fuel.]] | [[File:Biogas.jpg|thumb|Farmyard [[anaerobic digester]] converts waste plant material and manure from livestock into [[biogas]] fuel.]] | ||
A senior UN official, Henning Steinfeld, said that "Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html |title=Livestock a major threat to environment |publisher=UN Food and Agriculture Organization |date=29 November 2006 |access-date=24 April 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080328062709/http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html |archive-date=28 March 2008 |url-status=live}}</ref> Livestock production occupies 70% of all land used for agriculture, or 30% of the land surface of the planet. It is one of the largest sources of [[greenhouse gas]]es, responsible for 18% of the world's [[greenhouse gas emissions]] as measured in CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents. By comparison, all transportation emits 13.5% of the CO<sub>2</sub>. It produces 65% of human-related [[nitrous oxide]] (which has 296 times the global warming potential of CO<sub>2 | A senior UN official, Henning Steinfeld, said that "Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html |title=Livestock a major threat to environment |publisher=UN Food and Agriculture Organization |date=29 November 2006 |access-date=24 April 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080328062709/http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html |archive-date=28 March 2008 |url-status=live}}</ref> Livestock production occupies 70% of all land used for agriculture, or 30% of the land surface of the planet. It is one of the largest sources of [[greenhouse gas]]es, responsible for 18% of the world's [[greenhouse gas emissions]] as measured in CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents. By comparison, all transportation emits 13.5% of the CO<sub>2</sub>. It produces 65% of human-related [[nitrous oxide]] (which has 296 times the global warming potential of CO<sub>2</sub>) and 37% of all human-induced [[methane]] (which is 23 times as warming as CO<sub>2</sub>.) It also generates 64% of the [[ammonia]] emission. Livestock expansion is cited as a key factor driving [[deforestation]]; in the Amazon basin 70% of [[Deforestation of the Amazon Rainforest|previously forested area]] is now occupied by pastures and the remainder used for feedcrops.<ref name="LEAD">{{cite web |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080625012113/http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.pdf |archive-date=25 June 2008 |last1=Steinfeld |first1=H. |last2=Gerber |first2=P. |last3=Wassenaar |first3=T. |last4=Castel |first4=V. |last5=Rosales |first5=M. |last6=de Haan |first6=C. |year=2006 |publisher=U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization |location=Rome |url=http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.pdf |title=Livestock's Long Shadow – Environmental issues and options |access-date=5 December 2008}}</ref> Through deforestation and [[land degradation]], livestock is also driving reductions in biodiversity. Furthermore, the UNEP states that "[[methane emissions]] from global livestock are projected to increase by 60 per cent by 2030 under current practices and consumption patterns."<ref name="unep.org" /> | ||
=== Land and water issues === | === Land and water issues === | ||
Line 301: | Line 311: | ||
[[Eutrophication]], excessive nutrient enrichment in [[aquatic ecosystem]]s resulting in [[algal bloom]]s and [[anoxic waters|anoxia]], leads to [[fish kill]]s, loss of biodiversity, and renders water unfit for drinking and other industrial uses. Excessive fertilization and manure application to cropland, as well as high livestock stocking densities cause nutrient (mainly [[nitrogen]] and [[phosphorus]]) [[surface runoff|runoff]] and [[leaching (agriculture)|leaching]] from agricultural land. These nutrients are major [[nonpoint source pollution|nonpoint pollutants]] contributing to [[eutrophication]] of aquatic ecosystems and pollution of groundwater, with harmful effects on human populations.<ref name="Eutr">{{cite journal |author=Carpenter, S. R. |author2=Caraco, N. F. |author3=Correll, D. L. |author4=Howarth, R. W. |author5=Sharpley, A. N. |author6=Smith, V. H. |year=1998 |title=Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen |journal=Ecological Applications |volume=8 |pages=559–568 |doi=10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2 |issue=3 |hdl=1808/16724 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> Fertilisers also reduce terrestrial biodiversity by increasing competition for light, favouring those species that are able to benefit from the added nutrients.<ref name="Hautier Niklaus Hector">{{cite journal |last1=Hautier |first1=Y. |last2=Niklaus |first2=P. A. |last3=Hector |first3=A. |title=Competition for Light Causes Plant Biodiversity Loss After Eutrophication |journal=Science |volume=324 |issue=5927 |date=2009 |doi=10.1126/science.1169640 |pmid=19407202 |pages=636–638|bibcode=2009Sci...324..636H |s2cid=21091204 |url=https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/18666/2/Hautier_2009.pdf |type=Submitted manuscript }}</ref> | [[Eutrophication]], excessive nutrient enrichment in [[aquatic ecosystem]]s resulting in [[algal bloom]]s and [[anoxic waters|anoxia]], leads to [[fish kill]]s, loss of biodiversity, and renders water unfit for drinking and other industrial uses. Excessive fertilization and manure application to cropland, as well as high livestock stocking densities cause nutrient (mainly [[nitrogen]] and [[phosphorus]]) [[surface runoff|runoff]] and [[leaching (agriculture)|leaching]] from agricultural land. These nutrients are major [[nonpoint source pollution|nonpoint pollutants]] contributing to [[eutrophication]] of aquatic ecosystems and pollution of groundwater, with harmful effects on human populations.<ref name="Eutr">{{cite journal |author=Carpenter, S. R. |author2=Caraco, N. F. |author3=Correll, D. L. |author4=Howarth, R. W. |author5=Sharpley, A. N. |author6=Smith, V. H. |year=1998 |title=Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen |journal=Ecological Applications |volume=8 |pages=559–568 |doi=10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2 |issue=3 |hdl=1808/16724 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> Fertilisers also reduce terrestrial biodiversity by increasing competition for light, favouring those species that are able to benefit from the added nutrients.<ref name="Hautier Niklaus Hector">{{cite journal |last1=Hautier |first1=Y. |last2=Niklaus |first2=P. A. |last3=Hector |first3=A. |title=Competition for Light Causes Plant Biodiversity Loss After Eutrophication |journal=Science |volume=324 |issue=5927 |date=2009 |doi=10.1126/science.1169640 |pmid=19407202 |pages=636–638|bibcode=2009Sci...324..636H |s2cid=21091204 |url=https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/18666/2/Hautier_2009.pdf |type=Submitted manuscript }}</ref> | ||
Agriculture accounts for 70 percent of withdrawals of freshwater resources.<ref>{{cite web |editor=Molden, D. |url=http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/About_IWMI/Strategic_Documents/Annual_Reports/2006_2007/pdf/IWMI%20Annual%20Report%202006-07.pdf |title=Findings of the Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture |website=Annual Report 2006/2007 |publisher=International Water Management Institute |access-date=6 January 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140107031305/http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/About_IWMI/Strategic_Documents/Annual_Reports/2006_2007/pdf/IWMI%20Annual%20Report%202006-07.pdf |archive-date=7 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Cite | Agriculture accounts for 70 percent of withdrawals of freshwater resources.<ref>{{cite web |editor=Molden, D. |url=http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/About_IWMI/Strategic_Documents/Annual_Reports/2006_2007/pdf/IWMI%20Annual%20Report%202006-07.pdf |title=Findings of the Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture |website=Annual Report 2006/2007 |publisher=International Water Management Institute |access-date=6 January 2014 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140107031305/http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/About_IWMI/Strategic_Documents/Annual_Reports/2006_2007/pdf/IWMI%20Annual%20Report%202006-07.pdf |archive-date=7 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=On Water|url=https://www.eib.org/en/publications/eib-big-ideas-on-water|access-date=7 December 2020|website=European Investment Bank|year=2019|doi=10.2867/509830|language=en|author1=European Investment Bank|publisher=European Investment Bank|isbn=9789286143199}}</ref> Agriculture is a major draw on water from [[aquifer]]s, and currently draws from those underground water sources at an unsustainable rate. It is long known that aquifers in areas as diverse as northern China, the [[Ganges|Upper Ganges]] and the western US are being depleted, and new research extends these problems to aquifers in Iran, Mexico and Saudi Arabia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/stressed-aquifers-around-the-globe/|title=Stressed Aquifers Around the Globe |author=Li, Sophia |date=13 August 2012 |access-date=7 May 2013 |website=[[The New York Times]] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130402141530/http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/stressed-aquifers-around-the-globe/ |archive-date=2 April 2013 }}</ref> Increasing pressure is being placed on water resources by industry and urban areas, meaning that [[water scarcity]] is increasing and agriculture is facing the challenge of producing more food for the world's growing population with reduced water resources.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0511sp2.htm |title=Water Use in Agriculture |date=November 2005 |publisher=FAO |access-date=7 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130615091527/http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0511sp2.htm |archive-date=15 June 2013 }}</ref> [[Farm water|Agricultural water]] usage can also cause major environmental problems, including the destruction of natural wetlands, the spread of water-borne diseases, and land degradation through salinization and waterlogging, when irrigation is performed incorrectly.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0303sp1.htm |title=Water Management: Towards 2030 |date=March 2003 |publisher=[[Food and Agriculture Organization]] |access-date=7 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510184315/http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0303sp1.htm |archive-date=10 May 2013 }}</ref> | ||
=== Pesticides === | === Pesticides === | ||
Line 309: | Line 319: | ||
Pesticide use has increased since 1950 to 2.5{{nbsp}}million short tons annually worldwide, yet crop loss from pests has remained relatively constant.<ref name="Pimentel pesticide">{{cite web |author1=Pimentel, D. |author2=Culliney, T. W. |author3=Bashore, T. |year=1996 |url=http://ipmworld.umn.edu/chapters/pimentel.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19990218073023/http://ipmworld.umn.edu/chapters/pimentel.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=18 February 1999 |title=Public health risks associated with pesticides and natural toxins in foods |website=Radcliffe's IPM World Textbook |access-date=7 May 2013}}</ref> The World Health Organization estimated in 1992 that three million pesticide poisonings occur annually, causing 220,000 deaths.<ref name="WHO">''Our planet, our health: Report of the WHO commission on health and environment''. Geneva: [[World Health Organization]] (1992).</ref> Pesticides select for [[pesticide resistance]] in the pest population, leading to a condition termed the "pesticide treadmill" in which pest resistance warrants the development of a new pesticide.<ref name="CS Pest">"Strategies for Pest Control", pp. 355–383 in [[#Chrispeels|Chrispeels]]</ref> | Pesticide use has increased since 1950 to 2.5{{nbsp}}million short tons annually worldwide, yet crop loss from pests has remained relatively constant.<ref name="Pimentel pesticide">{{cite web |author1=Pimentel, D. |author2=Culliney, T. W. |author3=Bashore, T. |year=1996 |url=http://ipmworld.umn.edu/chapters/pimentel.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19990218073023/http://ipmworld.umn.edu/chapters/pimentel.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=18 February 1999 |title=Public health risks associated with pesticides and natural toxins in foods |website=Radcliffe's IPM World Textbook |access-date=7 May 2013}}</ref> The World Health Organization estimated in 1992 that three million pesticide poisonings occur annually, causing 220,000 deaths.<ref name="WHO">''Our planet, our health: Report of the WHO commission on health and environment''. Geneva: [[World Health Organization]] (1992).</ref> Pesticides select for [[pesticide resistance]] in the pest population, leading to a condition termed the "pesticide treadmill" in which pest resistance warrants the development of a new pesticide.<ref name="CS Pest">"Strategies for Pest Control", pp. 355–383 in [[#Chrispeels|Chrispeels]]</ref> | ||
An alternative argument is that the way to "save the environment" and prevent famine is by using pesticides and intensive high yield farming, a view exemplified by a quote heading the Center for Global Food Issues website: 'Growing more per acre leaves more land for nature'.<ref name="DAvery">{{cite book |author=Avery, D.T. |year=2000 |title=Saving the Planet with Pesticides and Plastic: The Environmental Triumph of High-Yield Farming |url=https://archive.org/details/savingplanetwith00aver |url-access=registration |publisher=Hudson Institute |location=Indianapolis}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |publisher=Center for Global Food Issues |url=http://www.cgfi.org |title=Center for Global Food Issues |access-date=14 July 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160221143850/http://www.cgfi.org/ |archive-date=21 February 2016}}</ref> However, critics argue that a trade-off between the environment and a need for food is not inevitable,<ref name="WH">Lappe, F. M.; Collins, J.; Rosset, P. (1998). [http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/bi430-fs430/Documents-2004/10B-DEVEL%20WORLD/World%20Hunger--Twelve%20Myths.pdf "Myth 4: Food vs. Our Environment"], pp. 42–57 in ''World Hunger, Twelve Myths'', Grove Press, New York. {{ISBN|9780802135919}}</ref> and that pesticides simply replace [[good agricultural practices|good agronomic practices]] such as crop rotation.<ref name="CS Pest" /> The [[Push–pull agricultural pest management]] technique involves intercropping, using plant aromas to repel pests from crops (push) and to lure them to a place from which they can then be removed (pull).<ref name=PushPull>{{Cite journal|author1=Cook, Samantha M. |author2=Khan, Zeyaur R. |author3=Pickett, John A. |year=2007 |title=The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management |journal=Annual Review of Entomology |volume=52|pages=375–400 |doi=10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407 |pmid=16968206}}</ref> | An alternative argument is that the way to "save the environment" and prevent famine is by using pesticides and intensive high yield farming, a view exemplified by a quote heading the Center for Global Food Issues website: 'Growing more per acre leaves more land for nature'.<ref name="DAvery">{{cite book |author=Avery, D.T. |year=2000 |title=Saving the Planet with Pesticides and Plastic: The Environmental Triumph of High-Yield Farming |url=https://archive.org/details/savingplanetwith00aver |url-access=registration |publisher=Hudson Institute |location=Indianapolis|isbn=9781558130692 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |publisher=Center for Global Food Issues |url=http://www.cgfi.org |title=Center for Global Food Issues |access-date=14 July 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160221143850/http://www.cgfi.org/ |archive-date=21 February 2016}}</ref> However, critics argue that a trade-off between the environment and a need for food is not inevitable,<ref name="WH">Lappe, F. M.; Collins, J.; Rosset, P. (1998). [http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/bi430-fs430/Documents-2004/10B-DEVEL%20WORLD/World%20Hunger--Twelve%20Myths.pdf "Myth 4: Food vs. Our Environment"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304102909/http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/bi430-fs430/Documents-2004/10B-DEVEL%20WORLD/World%20Hunger--Twelve%20Myths.pdf |date=4 March 2021 }}, pp. 42–57 in ''World Hunger, Twelve Myths'', Grove Press, New York. {{ISBN|9780802135919}}</ref> and that pesticides simply replace [[good agricultural practices|good agronomic practices]] such as crop rotation.<ref name="CS Pest" /> The [[Push–pull agricultural pest management]] technique involves intercropping, using plant aromas to repel pests from crops (push) and to lure them to a place from which they can then be removed (pull).<ref name=PushPull>{{Cite journal|author1=Cook, Samantha M. |author2=Khan, Zeyaur R. |author3=Pickett, John A. |year=2007 |title=The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management |journal=Annual Review of Entomology |volume=52|pages=375–400 |doi=10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407 |pmid=16968206}}</ref> | ||
=== Contributions to climate change === | |||
{{Main|2 = Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture}} | |||
Agriculture, and in particular animal husbandry, is responsible for [[greenhouse gas emissions]] of CO<sub>2</sub> and a percentage of the world's methane, and future land infertility, and the displacement of wildlife. Agriculture contributes to climate change by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases, and by the conversion of non-agricultural land such as forest for agricultural use.<ref>Section 4.2: Agriculture's current contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, in: {{cite book |author=HLPE |title=Food security and climate change. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security |url=http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/reports/hlpe-food-security-and-climate-change-report-elaboration-process/en/ |publisher=Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |location=Rome, Italy |date=June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141212075812/http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/reports/hlpe-food-security-and-climate-change-report-elaboration-process/en/ |archive-date=12 December 2014 |pages=67–69}}</ref> Agriculture, forestry and land-use change contributed around 20 to 25% to global annual emissions in 2010.<ref>Blanco, G., ''et al.''., Section 5.3.5.4: Agriculture, Forestry, Other Land Use, in: [http://report.mitigation2014.org/report/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter5.pdf Chapter 5: Drivers, Trends and Mitigation] (archived [https://web.archive.org/web/20141230092610/http://report.mitigation2014.org/report/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter5.pdf 30 December 2014)], in: {{cite book |year=2014 |author=IPCC AR5 WG3 |editor=Edenhofer, O. |title=Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III (WG3) to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |url=http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/ |publisher=Cambridge University Press |display-editors=etal |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141127222605/http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/ |archive-date=27 November 2014 |page=383}}. Emissions aggregated using 100-year [[global warming potential]]s from the [[IPCC Second Assessment Report]].</ref> A range of policies can reduce the risk of negative climate change impacts on agriculture,<ref>Porter, J. R., ''et al.''., Section 7.5: Adaptation and Managing Risks in Agriculture and Other Food System Activities, in [http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap7_FINAL.pdf Chapter 7: Food security and food production systems] (archived [https://web.archive.org/web/20141105164634/https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap7_FINAL.pdf 5 November 2014]), in {{cite book |year=2014 |author=IPCC AR5 WG2 A |editor=Field, C.B. |title=Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II (WG2) to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |url=http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/ |publisher=Cambridge University Press |display-editors=etal |pages=513–520}}</ref><ref>Oppenheimer, M., ''et al.''., Section 19.7. Assessment of Response Strategies to Manage Risks, in: [http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap19_FINAL.pdf Chapter 19: Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities] (archived [https://web.archive.org/web/20141105164634/https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Chap19_FINAL.pdf 5 November 2014]), in {{cite book |year=2014 |author=IPCC AR5WG2 A |editor=Field, C.B. |title=Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II (WG2) to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |url=http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/ |publisher=Cambridge University Press |display-editors=etal |page=1080}}</ref> and [[Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture|greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector]].<ref>Summary and Recommendations, in: {{cite book |author=HLPE |title=Food security and climate change. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security |url=http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/reports/hlpe-food-security-and-climate-change-report-elaboration-process/en/ |publisher=Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |location=Rome, Italy |date=June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141212075812/http://www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe/reports/hlpe-food-security-and-climate-change-report-elaboration-process/en/ |archive-date=12 December 2014 |pages=12–23}}</ref><ref>Current climate change policies are described in {{cite book |author=Annex I NC |title=6th national communications (NC6) from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention including those that are also Parties to the Kyoto Protocol |url=http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/items/7742.php |publisher=United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change |date=24 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140802030817/http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/items/7742.php |archive-date=2 August 2014 }} and {{citation |author=Non-Annex I NC |title=Non-Annex I national communications |url=http://unfccc.int/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/items/2979.php |publisher=United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change |date=11 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140913171139/http://unfccc.int/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/items/2979.php |archive-date=13 September 2014 }}</ref><ref>Smith, P., ''et al.''., Executive summary, in: [http://report.mitigation2014.org/report/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter5.pdf Chapter 5: Drivers, Trends and Mitigation] (archived [https://web.archive.org/web/20141230092610/http://report.mitigation2014.org/report/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter5.pdf 30 December 2014)], in: {{cite book |year=2014 |author=IPCC AR5 WG3 |editor=Edenhofer, O. |title=Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III (WG3) to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |url=http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/ |publisher=Cambridge University Press |display-editors=etal |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141127222605/http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/ |archive-date=27 November 2014 |pages=816–817}}</ref> | |||
=== Sustainability === | === Sustainability === | ||
Line 325: | Line 332: | ||
Current farming methods have resulted in over-stretched water resources, high levels of erosion and reduced soil fertility. There is not enough water to continue farming using current practices; therefore how critical water, land, and [[ecosystem]] resources are used to boost crop yields must be reconsidered. A solution would be to give value to ecosystems, recognizing environmental and livelihood tradeoffs, and balancing the rights of a variety of users and interests.<ref>{{cite web |editor=Boelee, E. |url=http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/topics/ecosystems/ |title=Ecosystems for water and food security |year=2011 |publisher=IWMI/UNEP |access-date=24 May 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130523025920/http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Topics/Ecosystems/ |archive-date=23 May 2013 }}</ref> Inequities that result when such measures are adopted would need to be addressed, such as the reallocation of water from poor to rich, the clearing of land to make way for more productive farmland, or the preservation of a wetland system that limits fishing rights.<ref>{{cite web |author=Molden, D. |url=http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/news_room/pdf/The-scientist_com-Opinion_The%20Water_Deficit.pdf |title=Opinion: The Water Deficit |publisher=The Scientist |access-date=23 August 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113125654/http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/news_room/pdf/The-scientist_com-Opinion_The%20Water_Deficit.pdf |archive-date=13 January 2012 }}</ref> | Current farming methods have resulted in over-stretched water resources, high levels of erosion and reduced soil fertility. There is not enough water to continue farming using current practices; therefore how critical water, land, and [[ecosystem]] resources are used to boost crop yields must be reconsidered. A solution would be to give value to ecosystems, recognizing environmental and livelihood tradeoffs, and balancing the rights of a variety of users and interests.<ref>{{cite web |editor=Boelee, E. |url=http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/topics/ecosystems/ |title=Ecosystems for water and food security |year=2011 |publisher=IWMI/UNEP |access-date=24 May 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130523025920/http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Topics/Ecosystems/ |archive-date=23 May 2013 }}</ref> Inequities that result when such measures are adopted would need to be addressed, such as the reallocation of water from poor to rich, the clearing of land to make way for more productive farmland, or the preservation of a wetland system that limits fishing rights.<ref>{{cite web |author=Molden, D. |url=http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/news_room/pdf/The-scientist_com-Opinion_The%20Water_Deficit.pdf |title=Opinion: The Water Deficit |publisher=The Scientist |access-date=23 August 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113125654/http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/news_room/pdf/The-scientist_com-Opinion_The%20Water_Deficit.pdf |archive-date=13 January 2012 }}</ref> | ||
Technological advancements help provide farmers with tools and resources to make farming more sustainable.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://croplife.intraspin.com/pesticides/paper.asp?id=461 |author=Safefood Consulting, Inc.|title=Benefits of Crop Protection Technologies on Canadian Food Production, Nutrition, Economy and the Environment |year=2005 |publisher=CropLife International |access-date=24 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130706005846/http://croplife.intraspin.com/pesticides/paper.asp?id=461 |archive-date=6 July 2013}}</ref> Technology permits innovations like [[conservation tillage]], a farming process which helps prevent land loss to erosion, reduces water pollution, and enhances [[carbon sequestration]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Trewavas, Anthony |title=A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture |journal=Crop Protection |year=2004 |pages=757–781 |doi=10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.009 |volume=23 |issue=9}}</ref> Other potential practices include [[conservation agriculture]], [[agroforestry]], improved [[Convertible husbandry|grazing]], avoided grassland conversion<!--WHAT?-->, and [[biochar]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Griscom |first1=Bronson W. |last2=Adams |first2=Justin |last3=Ellis |first3=Peter W. |last4=Houghton |first4=Richard A. |last5=Lomax |first5=Guy |last6=Miteva |first6=Daniela A. |last7=Schlesinger |first7=William H. |last8=Shoch |first8=David |last9=Siikamäki|first9=Juha V.|last10=Smith |first10=Pete |last11=Woodbury |first11=Peter |date=2017 |title=Natural climate solutions |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=114 |issue=44 |pages=11645–11650 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1710465114 |pmid=29078344 |pmc=5676916 |bibcode=2017PNAS..11411645G |issn=0027-8424}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda |publisher=National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-309-48452-7 |pages=117, 125, 135 |doi=10.17226/25259|pmid=31120708 |last1=National Academies Of Sciences |first1=Engineering }}</ref> Current mono-crop farming practices in the United States preclude widespread adoption of sustainable practices, such as 2-3 crop rotations that incorporate grass or hay with annual crops, unless negative emission goals such as soil carbon sequestration become policy.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25259/negative-emissions-technologies-and-reliable-sequestration-a-research-agenda |title=Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda |publisher=National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-309-48452-7 |page=97 |doi=10.17226/25259|pmid=31120708 |last1=National Academies Of Sciences |first1=Engineering }}</ref> | Technological advancements help provide farmers with tools and resources to make farming more sustainable.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://croplife.intraspin.com/pesticides/paper.asp?id=461 |author=Safefood Consulting, Inc.|title=Benefits of Crop Protection Technologies on Canadian Food Production, Nutrition, Economy and the Environment |year=2005 |publisher=CropLife International |access-date=24 May 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130706005846/http://croplife.intraspin.com/pesticides/paper.asp?id=461 |archive-date=6 July 2013}}</ref> Technology permits innovations like [[conservation tillage]], a farming process which helps prevent land loss to erosion, reduces water pollution, and enhances [[carbon sequestration]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Trewavas, Anthony |title=A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture |journal=Crop Protection |year=2004 |pages=757–781 |doi=10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.009 |volume=23 |issue=9}}</ref> Other potential practices include [[conservation agriculture]], [[agroforestry]], improved [[Convertible husbandry|grazing]], avoided grassland conversion<!--WHAT?-->, and [[biochar]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Griscom |first1=Bronson W. |last2=Adams |first2=Justin |last3=Ellis |first3=Peter W. |last4=Houghton |first4=Richard A. |last5=Lomax |first5=Guy |last6=Miteva |first6=Daniela A. |last7=Schlesinger |first7=William H. |last8=Shoch |first8=David |last9=Siikamäki|first9=Juha V.|last10=Smith |first10=Pete |last11=Woodbury |first11=Peter |date=2017 |title=Natural climate solutions |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=114 |issue=44 |pages=11645–11650 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1710465114 |pmid=29078344 |pmc=5676916 |bibcode=2017PNAS..11411645G |issn=0027-8424|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda |publisher=National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-309-48452-7 |pages=117, 125, 135 |doi=10.17226/25259|pmid=31120708 |last1=National Academies Of Sciences |first1=Engineering |s2cid=134196575 }}</ref> Current mono-crop farming practices in the United States preclude widespread adoption of sustainable practices, such as 2-3 crop rotations that incorporate grass or hay with annual crops, unless negative emission goals such as soil carbon sequestration become policy.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25259/negative-emissions-technologies-and-reliable-sequestration-a-research-agenda |title=Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda |publisher=National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-309-48452-7 |page=97 |doi=10.17226/25259|pmid=31120708 |last1=National Academies Of Sciences |first1=Engineering |s2cid=134196575 }}</ref> | ||
The International Food Policy Research Institute states that agricultural technologies will have the greatest impact on food production if adopted in combination with each other; using a model that assessed how eleven technologies could impact agricultural productivity, food security and trade by 2050, it found that the number of people at risk from hunger could be reduced by as much as 40% and food prices could be reduced by almost half.<ref name=ifpri/> The food demand of Earth's projected population, with current climate change predictions, could be satisfied by improvement of agricultural methods, expansion of agricultural areas, and a sustainability-oriented consumer mindset.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling |title=Ecological Modelling |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180123072613/https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling |archive-date=23 January 2018 }}</ref> | The International Food Policy Research Institute states that agricultural technologies will have the greatest impact on food production if adopted in combination with each other; using a model that assessed how eleven technologies could impact agricultural productivity, food security and trade by 2050, it found that the number of people at risk from hunger could be reduced by as much as 40% and food prices could be reduced by almost half.<ref name=ifpri/> The food demand of Earth's projected population, with current climate change predictions, could be satisfied by improvement of agricultural methods, expansion of agricultural areas, and a sustainability-oriented consumer mindset.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling |title=Ecological Modelling |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180123072613/https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling |archive-date=23 January 2018 }}</ref> | ||
Line 361: | Line 368: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Indirect consumption includes the manufacture of fertilizers, pesticides, and farm machinery.<ref name="ncseonline.org" /> In particular, the production of [[nitrogen fertilizer]] can account for over half of agricultural energy usage.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Energy and the food system |author1=Woods, Jeremy |author2=Williams, Adrian |author3=Hughes, John K. |author4=Black, Mairi |author5=Murphy, Richard |date=August 2010 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2010.0172 |pmid=20713398 |pmc=2935130 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society |volume=365 |pages=2991–3006 |issue=1554 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Together, direct and indirect consumption by US farms accounts for about 2% of the nation's energy use. Direct and indirect energy consumption by U.S. farms peaked in 1979, and has since gradually declined.<ref name="ncseonline.org" /> [[Food systems]] encompass not just agriculture but off-farm processing, packaging, transporting, marketing, consumption, and disposal of food and food-related items. Agriculture accounts for less than one-fifth of food system energy use in the US.<ref name="css.snre.umich.edu">{{cite web |author1=Heller, Martin |author2=Keoleian, Gregory |year=2000 |title=Life Cycle-Based Sustainability Indicators for Assessment of the U.S. Food System |publisher=University of Michigan Center for Sustainable Food Systems |url=http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS00-04.pdf |access-date=17 March 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314094203/http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS00-04.pdf |archive-date=14 March 2016 }}</ref><ref name=" | Indirect consumption includes the manufacture of fertilizers, pesticides, and farm machinery.<ref name="ncseonline.org" /> In particular, the production of [[nitrogen fertilizer]] can account for over half of agricultural energy usage.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Energy and the food system |author1=Woods, Jeremy |author2=Williams, Adrian |author3=Hughes, John K. |author4=Black, Mairi |author5=Murphy, Richard |date=August 2010 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2010.0172 |pmid=20713398 |pmc=2935130 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society |volume=365 |pages=2991–3006 |issue=1554 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Together, direct and indirect consumption by US farms accounts for about 2% of the nation's energy use. Direct and indirect energy consumption by U.S. farms peaked in 1979, and has since gradually declined.<ref name="ncseonline.org" /> [[Food systems]] encompass not just agriculture but off-farm processing, packaging, transporting, marketing, consumption, and disposal of food and food-related items. Agriculture accounts for less than one-fifth of food system energy use in the US.<ref name="ers.usda.gov" /><ref name="css.snre.umich.edu">{{cite web |author1=Heller, Martin |author2=Keoleian, Gregory |year=2000 |title=Life Cycle-Based Sustainability Indicators for Assessment of the U.S. Food System |publisher=University of Michigan Center for Sustainable Food Systems |url=http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS00-04.pdf |access-date=17 March 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314094203/http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS00-04.pdf |archive-date=14 March 2016 }}</ref> | ||
=== Plastic pollution === | |||
{{Main|Plastic pollution}} | |||
Plastic products are used extensively in agriculture, for example to increase crop yield and improve the efficiency of water and agrichemical use. “Agriplastic” products include films to cover [[greenhouse]]s and tunnels, mulch to cover soil (e.g. to suppress [[weed]]s, [[Water conservation|conserve water]], increase soil temperature and aid fertilizer application), shade cloth, pesticide containers, seedling trays, protective mesh and irrigation tubing. The polymers most commonly used in these products are low- density polyethylene (LPDE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC).<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Environment |first=U. N. |date=2021-10-21 |title=Drowning in Plastics – Marine Litter and Plastic Waste Vital Graphics |url=http://www.unep.org/resources/report/drowning-plastics-marine-litter-and-plastic-waste-vital-graphics |access-date=2022-03-23 |website=UNEP - UN Environment Programme |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The total amount of plastics used in agriculture is difficult to quantify. A 2012 study reported that almost 6.5 million tonnes per year were consumed globally while a later study estimated that global demand in 2015 was between 7.3 million and 9 million tonnes. Widespread use of plastic mulch and lack of systematic collection and management have led to the generation of large amounts of mulch residue.Weathering and degradation eventually cause the mulch to fragment. These fragments and larger pieces of plastic accumulate in soil. Mulch residue has been measured at levels of 50 to 260 kg per hectare in topsoil in areas where the mulch has been used for more than 10 years, which confirms that mulching is a major source of both microplastic and macroplastic contamination of soil.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
Agricultural plastics, especially plastic films, are not easy to recycle because of high contamination levels (up to 40- 50% by weight contamination by pesticides, fertilizers, soil and debris, moist vegetation, silage juice water, and UV stabilizers) and collection difficulties . Therefore, they are often buried or abandoned in fields and watercourses or burned. These disposal practices lead to soil degradation and can result in contamination of soils and leakage of microplastics into the marine environment as a result of precipitation run-off and tidal washing. In addition, additives in residual plastic film (such as UV and thermal stabilizers) may have deleterious effects on crop growth, soil structure,nutrient transport and salt levels. There is a risk that plastic mulch will deteriorate soil quality, deplete soil organic matter stocks, increase soil water repellence and emit greenhouse gases. Microplastics released through fragmentation of agricultural plastics can absorb and concentrate contaminants capable of being passed up the trophic chain.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
== Disciplines == | == Disciplines == | ||
Line 372: | Line 387: | ||
National government policies can significantly change the economic marketplace for agricultural products, in the form of taxation, [[Subsidy|subsidies]], tariffs and other measures.<ref name=LloydCroserAnderson2013>{{cite web |url=https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4101/WPS4864.pdf?sequence=1 |title=How Do Agricultural Policy Restrictions to Global Trade and Welfare Differ across Commodities? |author1=Lloyd, Peter J. |author2=Croser, Johanna L. |author3=Anderson, Kym |website=Policy Research Working Paper #4864 |publisher=The World Bank |access-date=16 April 2013 |date=March 2009 |pages=2–3 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605125346/https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4101/WPS4864.pdf?sequence=1 |archive-date=5 June 2013}}</ref> Since at least the 1960s, a combination of trade restrictions, [[exchange rate policy|exchange rate policies]] and subsidies have affected farmers in both the developing and the developed world. In the 1980s, non-subsidized farmers in developing countries experienced adverse effects from national policies that created artificially low global prices for farm products. Between the mid-1980s and the early 2000s, several international agreements limited agricultural tariffs, subsidies and other trade restrictions.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8699/wps3901.pdf?sequence=1 |title=Do Global Trade Distortions Still Harm Developing Country Farmers? |author1=Anderson, Kym |author2=Valenzuela, Ernesto |website=World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3901 |date=April 2006 |publisher=World Bank |access-date=16 April 2013 |pages=1–2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605145451/https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8699/wps3901.pdf?sequence=1 |archive-date=5 June 2013 }}</ref> | National government policies can significantly change the economic marketplace for agricultural products, in the form of taxation, [[Subsidy|subsidies]], tariffs and other measures.<ref name=LloydCroserAnderson2013>{{cite web |url=https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4101/WPS4864.pdf?sequence=1 |title=How Do Agricultural Policy Restrictions to Global Trade and Welfare Differ across Commodities? |author1=Lloyd, Peter J. |author2=Croser, Johanna L. |author3=Anderson, Kym |website=Policy Research Working Paper #4864 |publisher=The World Bank |access-date=16 April 2013 |date=March 2009 |pages=2–3 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605125346/https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4101/WPS4864.pdf?sequence=1 |archive-date=5 June 2013}}</ref> Since at least the 1960s, a combination of trade restrictions, [[exchange rate policy|exchange rate policies]] and subsidies have affected farmers in both the developing and the developed world. In the 1980s, non-subsidized farmers in developing countries experienced adverse effects from national policies that created artificially low global prices for farm products. Between the mid-1980s and the early 2000s, several international agreements limited agricultural tariffs, subsidies and other trade restrictions.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8699/wps3901.pdf?sequence=1 |title=Do Global Trade Distortions Still Harm Developing Country Farmers? |author1=Anderson, Kym |author2=Valenzuela, Ernesto |website=World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3901 |date=April 2006 |publisher=World Bank |access-date=16 April 2013 |pages=1–2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605145451/https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8699/wps3901.pdf?sequence=1 |archive-date=5 June 2013 }}</ref> | ||
However, {{as of|2009|lc=y}}, there was still a significant amount of policy-driven distortion in global agricultural product prices. The three agricultural products with the | However, {{as of|2009|lc=y}}, there was still a significant amount of policy-driven distortion in global agricultural product prices. The three agricultural products with the most trade distortion were sugar, milk and rice, mainly due to taxation. Among the [[oilseed]]s, sesame had the most taxation, but overall, feed grains and oilseeds had much lower levels of taxation than livestock products. Since the 1980s, policy-driven distortions have seen a greater decrease among livestock products than crops during the worldwide reforms in agricultural policy.<ref name=LloydCroserAnderson2013 /> Despite this progress, certain crops, such as cotton, still see subsidies in developed countries artificially deflating global prices, causing hardship in developing countries with non-subsidized farmers.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/may/24/american-cotton-subsidies-illegal-obama-must-act |title=America's $24bn subsidy damages developing world cotton farmers |author=Kinnock, Glenys |date=24 May 2011 |access-date=16 April 2013 |newspaper=The Guardian |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130906122834/http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/may/24/american-cotton-subsidies-illegal-obama-must-act |archive-date=6 September 2013 }}</ref> Unprocessed commodities such as corn, soybeans, and cattle are generally graded to indicate quality, affecting the price the producer receives. Commodities are generally reported by production quantities, such as volume, number or weight.<ref>{{cite web |title=Agriculture's Bounty |url=http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/studies/AgriculturesBounty.pdf |date=May 2013 |access-date=19 August 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130826100413/http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/studies/AgriculturesBounty.pdf |archive-date=26 August 2013 }}</ref> | ||
=== Agricultural science === | === Agricultural science === | ||
Line 407: | Line 422: | ||
[[Agricultural policy]] is the set of government decisions and actions relating to domestic agriculture and imports of foreign agricultural products. Governments usually implement agricultural policies with the goal of achieving a specific outcome in the domestic agricultural product markets. Some overarching themes include risk management and adjustment (including policies related to climate change, food safety and natural disasters), [[economic stability]] (including policies related to taxes), natural resources and [[environmental sustainability]] (especially [[water resource management|water policy]]), research and development, and market access for domestic commodities (including relations with global organizations and agreements with other countries).<ref>{{cite journal |page=13 |title=Agricultural and food policy choices in Australia |journal=Sustainable Agriculture and Food Policy in the 21st Century: Challenges and Solutions |date=October 2010 |access-date=22 April 2013 |author1=Hogan, Lindsay |author2=Morris, Paul |url=http://coserve.com.au/PDF/VirtualMeeting/ABARE-Agric_food_policy_CONFERENCE_PAPER-2010.pdf}}</ref> Agricultural policy can also touch on [[food quality]], ensuring that the food supply is of a consistent and known quality, food security, ensuring that the food supply meets the population's needs, and [[Conservation biology|conservation]]. Policy programs can range from financial programs, such as subsidies, to encouraging producers to enroll in voluntary quality assurance programs.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://europa.eu/european-union/topics/agriculture_en |title=Agriculture: Not Just Farming |publisher=European Union |access-date=8 May 2018 |date=16 June 2016 }}</ref> | [[Agricultural policy]] is the set of government decisions and actions relating to domestic agriculture and imports of foreign agricultural products. Governments usually implement agricultural policies with the goal of achieving a specific outcome in the domestic agricultural product markets. Some overarching themes include risk management and adjustment (including policies related to climate change, food safety and natural disasters), [[economic stability]] (including policies related to taxes), natural resources and [[environmental sustainability]] (especially [[water resource management|water policy]]), research and development, and market access for domestic commodities (including relations with global organizations and agreements with other countries).<ref>{{cite journal |page=13 |title=Agricultural and food policy choices in Australia |journal=Sustainable Agriculture and Food Policy in the 21st Century: Challenges and Solutions |date=October 2010 |access-date=22 April 2013 |author1=Hogan, Lindsay |author2=Morris, Paul |url=http://coserve.com.au/PDF/VirtualMeeting/ABARE-Agric_food_policy_CONFERENCE_PAPER-2010.pdf}}</ref> Agricultural policy can also touch on [[food quality]], ensuring that the food supply is of a consistent and known quality, food security, ensuring that the food supply meets the population's needs, and [[Conservation biology|conservation]]. Policy programs can range from financial programs, such as subsidies, to encouraging producers to enroll in voluntary quality assurance programs.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://europa.eu/european-union/topics/agriculture_en |title=Agriculture: Not Just Farming |publisher=European Union |access-date=8 May 2018 |date=16 June 2016 }}</ref> | ||
There are many influences on the creation of agricultural policy, including consumers, agribusiness, trade lobbies and other groups. [[Agribusiness]] interests hold a large amount of influence over policy making, in the form of [[lobbying]] and [[campaign contribution]]s. Political action groups, including those interested in environmental issues and labor unions, also provide influence, as do lobbying organizations representing individual agricultural commodities.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://faculty.missouri.edu/ikerdj/papers/SFT-Corporatization%20of%20Fm%20Pol%20(9-10).htm |title=Corporatization of Agricultural Policy |author=Ikerd, John |journal=Small Farm Today Magazine |year=2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160807024012/http://faculty.missouri.edu/ikerdj/papers/SFT-Corporatization%20of%20Fm%20Pol%20(9-10).htm |archive-date=7 August 2016 }}</ref> The [[Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]] (FAO) leads international efforts to defeat hunger and provides a forum for the negotiation of global agricultural regulations and agreements | There are many influences on the creation of agricultural policy, including consumers, agribusiness, trade lobbies and other groups. [[Agribusiness]] interests hold a large amount of influence over policy making, in the form of [[lobbying]] and [[campaign contribution]]s. Political action groups, including those interested in environmental issues and labor unions, also provide influence, as do lobbying organizations representing individual agricultural commodities.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://faculty.missouri.edu/ikerdj/papers/SFT-Corporatization%20of%20Fm%20Pol%20(9-10).htm |title=Corporatization of Agricultural Policy |author=Ikerd, John |journal=Small Farm Today Magazine |year=2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160807024012/http://faculty.missouri.edu/ikerdj/papers/SFT-Corporatization%20of%20Fm%20Pol%20(9-10).htm |archive-date=7 August 2016 }}</ref> The [[Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]] (FAO) leads international efforts to defeat hunger and provides a forum for the negotiation of global agricultural regulations and agreements. Samuel Jutzi, director of FAO's animal production and health division, states that lobbying by large corporations has stopped reforms that would improve human health and the environment. For example, proposals in 2010 for a voluntary code of conduct for the livestock industry that would have provided incentives for improving standards for health, and environmental regulations, such as the number of animals an area of land can support without long-term damage, were successfully defeated due to large food company pressure.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/sep/22/food-firms-lobbying-samuel-jutzi |title=Corporate Lobbying Is Blocking Food Reforms, Senior UN Official Warns: Farming Summit Told of Delaying Tactics by Large Agribusiness and Food Producers on Decisions that Would Improve Human Health and the Environment |author=Jowit, Juliette |date=22 September 2010 |newspaper=The Guardian |access-date=8 May 2018}}</ref> | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Line 416: | Line 431: | ||
* [[Agricultural aircraft]] | * [[Agricultural aircraft]] | ||
* [[Agricultural engineering]] | * [[Agricultural engineering]] | ||
* [[Agricultural machinery]] | |||
* [[Agricultural robot]] | * [[Agricultural robot]] | ||
* [[Agroecology]] | * [[Agroecology]] | ||
* [[Agribusiness]] | |||
* [[Agrominerals]] | |||
* [[Building-integrated agriculture]] | * [[Building-integrated agriculture]] | ||
* [[Contract farming]] | * [[Contract farming]] | ||
Line 428: | Line 446: | ||
* [[Remote sensing]] | * [[Remote sensing]] | ||
* [[Subsistence economy]] | * [[Subsistence economy]] | ||
* [[Sustainable agriculture]] | |||
* [[Vertical farming]] | * [[Vertical farming]] | ||
* [[Vegetable farming]] | * [[Vegetable farming]] | ||
Line 440: | Line 459: | ||
* {{cite book |last1=Chrispeels |first1=Maarten J. |last2=Sadava |first2=David E. |ref=Chrispeels |title=Plants, Genes, and Agriculture |publisher=Jones and Bartlett |place=Boston, Massachusetts |isbn=978-0-86720-871-9|year=1994}} | * {{cite book |last1=Chrispeels |first1=Maarten J. |last2=Sadava |first2=David E. |ref=Chrispeels |title=Plants, Genes, and Agriculture |publisher=Jones and Bartlett |place=Boston, Massachusetts |isbn=978-0-86720-871-9|year=1994}} | ||
* {{cite book |last=Needham |first=Joseph |author-link=Joseph Needham |ref=Needham |year=1986 |title=Science and Civilization in China |place= Taipei |publisher=Caves Books}} | * {{cite book |last=Needham |first=Joseph |author-link=Joseph Needham |ref=Needham |year=1986 |title=Science and Civilization in China |place= Taipei |publisher=Caves Books}} | ||
{{Free-content attribution | |||
| title = Drowning in Plastics – Marine Litter and Plastic Waste Vital Graphics | |||
| publisher = United Nations Environment Programme | |||
| documentURL = https://www.unep.org/resources/report/drowning-plastics-marine-litter-and-plastic-waste-vital-graphics | |||
| license statement URL = https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:United_Nations_Environment_Programme_Drowning_in_Plastics_%E2%80%93_Marine_Litter_and_Plastic_Waste_Vital_Graphics.pdf | |||
| license = CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO | |||
}} | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Line 456: | Line 482: | ||
{{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
[[Category:Agriculture|Agriculture]] | [[Category:Agriculture|Agriculture]] | ||
[[Category:Agronomy]] | [[Category:Agronomy]] | ||
[[Category:Food industry]] | [[Category:Food industry]] |