Bots, trusted
7,437
edits
Bharatpedia:Disruptive editing: Difference between revisions
m
→{{anchor|IDHT}}{{anchor|Refusal to 'get the point'}}Failure or refusal to "get the point": robot:, replaced: wp: → BP:
CleanupBot (talk | contribs) m (→top: robot: remove incorrect protection templates) |
WikiDwarfBOT (talk | contribs) m (→{{anchor|IDHT}}{{anchor|Refusal to 'get the point'}}Failure or refusal to "get the point": robot:, replaced: wp: → BP:) |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Sometimes, editors perpetuate disputes by sticking to an allegation or viewpoint long after the [[BP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] of the community has decided that moving on to other topics would be more productive. Such behavior is disruptive to Bharatpedia. | Sometimes, editors perpetuate disputes by sticking to an allegation or viewpoint long after the [[BP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] of the community has decided that moving on to other topics would be more productive. Such behavior is disruptive to Bharatpedia. | ||
Believing that you have a valid point does not confer upon you the right to act as though your point must be accepted by [[ | Believing that you have a valid point does not confer upon you the right to act as though your point must be accepted by [[BP:The community|the community]] when you have been told that it is not accepted. The community's rejection of your idea is ''not'' proof that they have failed to hear you. Stop writing, listen, and consider what the other editors are telling you. Make a strong effort to see their side of the debate, and work on finding points of agreement. Do not confuse "hearing" with "[[BP:AGREE|agreeing with]]". | ||
Sometimes, even when editors act in [[BP:Assume good faith|good faith]], their contributions may continue to be disruptive and time-wasting, for example, by continuing to say they don't understand what the problem is. Although editors should be encouraged to [[BP:BOLD|be bold]] and just do things if they think they're right, sometimes a [[BP:CIR|lack of competence]] can get in the way. If the community spends more time cleaning up editors' mistakes and educating them about policies and guidelines than it considers necessary, [[Bharatpedia:Sanctions|sanctions]] may have to be imposed. | Sometimes, even when editors act in [[BP:Assume good faith|good faith]], their contributions may continue to be disruptive and time-wasting, for example, by continuing to say they don't understand what the problem is. Although editors should be encouraged to [[BP:BOLD|be bold]] and just do things if they think they're right, sometimes a [[BP:CIR|lack of competence]] can get in the way. If the community spends more time cleaning up editors' mistakes and educating them about policies and guidelines than it considers necessary, [[Bharatpedia:Sanctions|sanctions]] may have to be imposed. | ||