Forty-first Amendment of the Constitution of India: Difference between revisions
Forty-first Amendment of the Constitution of India (edit)
Revision as of 20:46, 10 December 2021
, 10 December 2021Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: isbn. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_webform 343/2200
(Age for retirement of state public service commission) |
->Citation bot (Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: isbn. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_webform 343/2200) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
==Proposal and enactment== | ==Proposal and enactment== | ||
''The Constitution (Forty-first Amendment) Act, 1976'' was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 26 August 1976, as the ''Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Bill, 1976'' (Bill No. 85 of 1976). It was introduced by [[Om Mehta]], then Minister of State in the [[Ministry of Home Affairs (India)|Ministry of Home Affairs]], Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms and Department of Parliamentary Affairs, and sought to amend article 316 of the Constitution.<ref name="Constitution Amendment in India">{{cite book|title=Constitution Amendment in India|date=1 January 1995|publisher=Northern Book Centre|location=New Delhi|pages=72–73;190;361|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4yp0yhzdKWIC | ''The Constitution (Forty-first Amendment) Act, 1976'' was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 26 August 1976, as the ''Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Bill, 1976'' (Bill No. 85 of 1976). It was introduced by [[Om Mehta]], then Minister of State in the [[Ministry of Home Affairs (India)|Ministry of Home Affairs]], Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms and Department of Parliamentary Affairs, and sought to amend article 316 of the Constitution.<ref name="Constitution Amendment in India">{{cite book|title=Constitution Amendment in India|date=1 January 1995|publisher=Northern Book Centre|location=New Delhi|pages=72–73;190;361|isbn=9788172110659|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4yp0yhzdKWIC|edition=Sixth|editor=R.C. Bhardwaj|accessdate=8 December 2013}}</ref> The full text of the Statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the bill is given below: | ||
{{quote|Article 316(2) of the Constitution provides that the Chairman and Members of a State Public Service Commission or Joint Commission shall retire at 58 or hold office for a term of six years from the date on which they enter service, whichever is earlier. This was the position when the Constitution came into force. Subsequently, while the age of retirement of the High Court Judges was changed to 58, that of the Chairman and the Members of the State Public Service Commissions remained unchanged. | {{quote|Article 316(2) of the Constitution provides that the Chairman and Members of a State Public Service Commission or Joint Commission shall retire at 58 or hold office for a term of six years from the date on which they enter service, whichever is earlier. This was the position when the Constitution came into force. Subsequently, while the age of retirement of the High Court Judges was changed to 58, that of the Chairman and the Members of the State Public Service Commissions remained unchanged. |