Editing abuse filter

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	53
Description: (publicly viewable)
Statistics:	Of the last 31 actions, this filter has matched 0 (0%). On average, its run time is 0.42 ms, and it consumes 1.1 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions:	user_age == 0 & ( ip_in_range(user_name, "2607:fb90:0:0:0:0:0:0/32") \| ip_in_range(user_name, "172.58.0.0/16") ) user_age == 0 & ( ip_in_range(user_name, "2607:fb90:0:0:0:0:0:0/32") \| ip_in_range(user_name, "172.58.0.0/16") )
Notes:	This temporary filter will log a lot of edits, most of which totally innocent and not requiring action. There has been a lot of disruption on a number of namespaces from this range, and an easier way of logging it has been requested by a number of admins and counter-vandalism patrollers. The performance implications of this filter should be minimal --TheresNoTime 22/03/2017 This range edits infrequently enough (about 1,000 edits over 4 days) that a tag in the history, to ensure other editors know the prevalence of abuse from this range, seems like a net positive for administration without a major impact to the server load. We'll see how this goes... --Coffee 26/03/2017 +hops --Coffee 02/04/2017 +hop --Coffee 04/04/2017 At this point you're consuming at least 4 conditions when accounts edit, so adding `user_age == 0` to reduce to 1 condition for those users ~MA 2017-04-04 Remove two blocked ranges ~ Rob 4/5 Noted that 89.198.161.213 performed edits that are the same as an IP that hit this filter. Beetstra, March 23, 2020
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	19:15, 27 September 2021 by WikiDwarf (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"user_age == 0 \u0026 (\r\n ip_in_range(user_name, \"2607:fb90:0:0:0:0:0:0/32\") \|\r\n ip_in_range(user_name, \"172.58.0.0/16\")\r\n)","name":"LTA tracking","comments":"This temporary filter will log a lot of edits, most of which totally innocent and not requiring action. There has been a lot of disruption on a number of namespaces from this range, and an easier way of logging it has been requested by a number of admins and counter-vandalism patrollers. The performance implications of this filter should be minimal --TheresNoTime 22/03/2017\r\n\r\nThis range edits infrequently enough (about 1,000 edits over 4 days) that a tag in the history, to ensure other editors know the prevalence of abuse from this range, seems like a net positive for administration without a major impact to the server load. We'll see how this goes... --Coffee 26/03/2017\r\n\r\n+hops --Coffee 02/04/2017\r\n+hop --Coffee 04/04/2017\r\n\r\nAt this point you're consuming at least 4 conditions when accounts edit, so adding `user_age == 0` to reduce to 1 condition for those users ~MA 2017-04-04\r\n\r\nRemove two blocked ranges ~ Rob 4/5\r\n\r\nNoted that 89.198.161.213 performed edits that are the same as an IP that hit this filter. Beetstra, March 23, 2020","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["Possible disruption"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"hidden":false,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["Possible disruption"]}}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Block the user and/or IP address from editing

Block the user and/or IP address from editing their own talk page

Block duration for anonymous users:

Block duration for registered users:

Tag the edit for further review

Tags to apply:

Possible disruption