Created by 85.97.80.238
Last edited February 14, 2026
m Removing protection template from an unprotected page
m brief cleanup layout and improved wording
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Act of conveying intended meaning}}
{{Short description|Transmission of information}}
{{Distinguish|Socialization}}
{{hatnote group|
{{Other uses}}
{{Other uses}}
{{Redirect|Communicate}}
{{Redirect|Communicate}}
}}
{{Featured article}}
{{Pp-pc}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2023}}
{{multiple image
|perrow            = 2 / 2 / 2
|total_width      = 350
|image1            = Stephen_Avenue_3.jpg
|alt1              = Statue of two businessmen talking
|link1            = Spoken language
|image2            = Sign_language,_2014_(01).jpg
|alt2              = Photo of two women using sign language
|link2            = Sign language
|image3            = Athanasios Rousopoulos to Ioannis Koletis 1845.jpg
|alt3              = Photo of a letter
|link3            = Writing
|image4            = Little_bird_singing.jpg
|alt4              = Photo of a singing bird
|link4            = Animal communication
|image5            = Sharing_Information.jpg
|alt5              = Photo of two bees interacting with each other
|link5            = Bee learning and communication#Dance communication
|image6            = Pioneer_plaque.svg
|alt6              = Illustration of the Pioneer plaque
|link6            = Pioneer plaque
|footer            = There are many forms of communication, including [[Human communication|human linguistic communication]] using sounds, sign language, and writing as well as [[Animal communication|animals exchanging information]] and attempts to communicate with [[intelligent extraterrestrial life]].
}}


{{Communication}}
'''Communication''' is commonly defined as the transmission of [[information]]. Its precise definition is disputed and there are disagreements about whether [[Intention|unintentional]] or failed transmissions are included and whether communication not only transmits [[semantics|meaning]] but also creates it. [[Models of communication]] are simplified overviews of its main components and their interactions. Many models include the idea that a source uses a [[code|coding]] system to express information in the form of a message. The message is sent through a [[Communication channel|channel]] to a receiver who has to decode it to understand it. The main field of inquiry investigating communication is called [[communication studies]].


'''Communication''' (from {{lang-la|communicare}}, meaning "to share" or "to be in relation with")<ref>{{Citation|last=Cobley|first=Paul|title=Communication: Definitions and Concepts|date=2008-06-05|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc071|encyclopedia=The International Encyclopedia of Communication|pages=wbiecc071|editor-last=Donsbach|editor-first=Wolfgang|place=Chichester, UK|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Ltd|language=en|doi=10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc071|isbn=978-1-4051-8640-7|access-date=2021-07-20}}</ref><ref>{{OEtymD|communication|accessdate=2013-06-23}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=What Is Communication?|url=https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/an-introduction-to-group-communication/s03-02-what-is-communication.html#:~:text=Defining%20Communication,(1967).&text=CommunicationThe%20process%20of%20understanding,of%20understanding%20and%20sharing%20meaning.|access-date=2021-03-23|website=2012books.lardbucket.org}}</ref> is "an apparent answer to the painful divisions between [[self]] and other, private and public, and inner thought and outer world."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Peters|first=John Durham|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/40452957|title=Speaking into the air : a history of the idea of communication|date=1999|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=0-226-66276-4|location=Chicago|page=2|oclc=40452957}}</ref> As this definition indicates, communication is difficult to define in a consistent manner,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dance|first=Frank E. X.|date=1970-06-01|title=The "Concept" of Communication|url=https://academic.oup.com/joc/article/20/2/201-210/4560917|journal=Journal of Communication|language=en|volume=20|issue=2|pages=201–210|doi=10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00877.x|issn=0021-9916}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Craig|first=Robert T.|date=1999|title=Communication Theory as a Field|url=https://academic.oup.com/ct/article/9/2/119-161/4201776|journal=Communication Theory|language=en|volume=9|issue=2|pages=119–161|doi=10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x}}</ref> because in common use it refers to a very wide range of different behaviours involved in the propagation of information.<ref>{{Citation|last1=Littlejohn|first1=Stephen|title=Definitions of Communication|date=2009|url=https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/communicationtheory/n108.xml|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Communication Theory|pages=296–299|place=Thousand Oaks|publisher=SAGE Publications, Inc.|access-date=2021-07-20|last2=Foss|first2=Karen|doi=10.4135/9781412959384|isbn=9781412959377}}</ref> John Peters argues the difficulty of defining communication emerges from the fact that communication is both a universal phenomenon (because everyone communicates) and a specific [[Academic discipline|discipline]] of institutional academic study.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Peters|first=John Durham|title=Institutional Sources of Intellectual Poverty in Communication Research|date=1986|url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365086013004002|journal=Communication Research|language=en|volume=13|issue=4|pages=527–559|doi=10.1177/009365086013004002|s2cid=145639228|issn=0093-6502}}</ref>
A common way to classify communication is by whether information is exchanged between humans, members of other species, or non-living entities such as computers. For human communication, a central contrast is between [[Verbal communication|verbal]] and [[non-verbal communication]]. Verbal communication involves the exchange of messages in [[Language|linguistic]] form, including spoken and written messages as well as [[sign language]]. Non-verbal communication happens without the use of a [[linguistic system]], for example, using [[body language]], [[Sense of touch|touch]], and facial expressions. Another distinction is between [[interpersonal communication]], which happens between distinct persons, and [[intrapersonal communication]], which is communication with oneself. [[Communicative competence]] is the ability to communicate well and applies to the skills of formulating messages and understanding them.


One definitional strategy involves limiting what can be included in the category of communication (for example, requiring a "conscious intent" to persuade<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Miller|first=Gerald R.|date=1966-06-01|title=On Defining Communication: Another Stab|url=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00020.x|journal=Journal of Communication|volume=16|issue=2|pages=88–98|doi=10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00020.x|pmid=5941548|issn=0021-9916}}</ref>). By this logic, one possible definition of communication is the act of developing [[Semantics|meaning]] among [[Subject (philosophy)|entities]] or [[Organization|groups]] through the use of sufficiently mutually understood [[sign]]s, [[symbol]]s, and [[Semiosis|semiotic]] conventions.
Non-human forms of communication include [[Animal communication|animal]] and [[plant communication]]. Researchers in this field often refine their definition of communicative behavior by including the criteria that observable responses are present and that the participants benefit from the exchange. Animal communication is used in areas like [[Courtship display|courtship]] and mating, parent–offspring relations, navigation, and self-defense. Communication through chemicals is particularly important for the relatively immobile plants. For example, [[maple]] trees release so-called [[volatile organic compound]]s into the air to warn other plants of a [[herbivore]] attack. Most communication takes place between members of the same species. The reason is that its purpose is usually some form of cooperation, which is not as common between different species. [[Interspecies communication]] happens mainly in cases of [[Symbiosis|symbiotic]] relationships. For instance, many flowers use symmetrical shapes and distinctive colors to signal to insects where [[nectar]] is located. Humans engage in interspecies communication when interacting with [[pet]]s and [[Working animal|working animals]].


In [[Claude Shannon]]'s and [[Warren Weaver]]'s influential<ref>Fiske, John (1982): ''Introduction to Communication Studies''. London: Routledge</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Chandler|first=Daniel|date=18 September 1995|title=The Transmission Model of Communication|url=http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/short/trans.html?LMCL=xbWw8Z&LMCL=RcvMrF|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506161215/http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/short/trans.html?LMCL=xbWw8Z&LMCL=RcvMrF |archive-date=2021-05-06 }}</ref> model, human communication was imagined to function like a telephone or telegraph.<ref>Shannon, Claude E. & Warren Weaver (1949). ''A Mathematical Model of Communication''. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press</ref> Accordingly, they conceptualized communication as involving discrete steps:
Human communication has a long [[History of communication|history]] and how people exchange information has evolved over time. These changes were usually triggered by the development of new [[communication technology|communication technologies]]. Examples are the invention of [[Writing system|writing systems]], the development of mass printing, the use of radio and television, and the invention of the internet. The technological advances also led to new forms of communication, such as the [[Computer network|exchange of data between computers]].


# The formation of communicative [[motivation]] or [[reason]].
== Definitions ==
# [[Message]] composition (further [[mind|internal]] or [[technology|technical]] elaboration on what exactly to express).
The word ''{{linktext|communication}}'' has its root in the [[Latin]] verb {{lang|La|{{linktext|communicare}}}}, which means {{gloss|to share}} or {{gloss|to make common}}.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Rosengren|2000|pp=1–2|loc=1.1 On communication}} |2={{harvnb|Cobley|2008|pp=[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc071 660–666]}} |3={{harvnb|Meinel|Sack|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=5O25BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA89 89]}} }}</ref> Communication is usually understood as the transmission of information:<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|HarperCollins staff|2022}} | {{harvnb|Merriam-Webster staff|2022}} | {{harvnb|Cambridge Dictionary staff|2022}} }}</ref> a [[message]] is conveyed from a sender to a receiver using some medium, such as sound, written signs, bodily movements, or electricity.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Rosengren|2000|pp=1–2|loc=1.1 On communication}} | {{harvnb|Munodawafa|2008|pp=369–370}} | {{harvnb|Blackburn|1996a|loc=[https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/meaning-and-communication/v-1 Meaning and communication]}} }}</ref> Sender and receiver are often distinct individuals but it is also possible for an individual to communicate with themselves. In some cases, sender and receiver are not individuals but groups like organizations, social classes, or nations.<ref>{{harvnb|Rosengren|2000|pp=1–2|loc=1.1 On communication}}</ref> In a different sense, the term ''communication'' refers to the message that is being communicated or to the [[Communication studies|field of inquiry studying communicational phenomena]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|HarperCollins staff|2022}} | {{harvnb|Cambridge Dictionary staff|2022}} }}</ref>
# Message encoding (for example, into [[digital data]], [[written text]], [[spoken word|speech]], [[picture]]s, [[gesture]]s and so on).
# [[Transmission (telecommunications)|Transmission]] of the encoded message as a sequence of signals using a specific [[Communication channel|channel]] or [[Media (communication)|medium]].
# [[communication noise|Noise sources]] such as natural forces and in some cases human activity (both intentional and accidental) begin influencing the quality of signals propagating from the sender to one or more receivers.
# [[wikt:reception|Reception]] of signals and reassembling of the encoded message from a sequence of received signals.
# Decoding of the reassembled encoded message.
# [[:wikt:interpretation|Interpretation]] and [[nous|making sense]] of the [[presumed]] original message.


These elements are now understood to be substantially overlapping and recursive activities rather than steps in a sequence.<ref>Reddy, Michael J. (1979). "The Conduit Metaphor -- A Case of Frame Conflict in our Language about Language." In ''Metaphor and Thought,'' Andrew Ortony, ed. Cambridge UP: 284-324.</ref> For example, communicative actions can commence before a communicator formulates a conscious attempt to do so,<ref>{{Cite book|last=Cooper|first=Marilyn M.|title=The Animal Who Writes|publisher=University of Pittsburgh Press|year=2019|isbn=978-0-8229-6579-4|location=Pittsburgh|pages=127–156}}</ref> as in the case of [[Phatic expression|phatics]]; likewise, communicators modify their intentions and formulations of a message in response to real-time feedback (e.g., a change in [[facial expression]]).<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last=Rommetveit|first=Ragnar|title=On Message Structure: A Framework for the Study of Language and Communication|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|year=1974|isbn=0-471-73295-8|location=London}}</ref> Practices of decoding and interpretation are culturally enacted, not just by individuals ([[genre]] conventions, for instance, trigger anticipatory expectations for how a message is to be received), and receivers of any message operationalize their own frames of reference in interpretation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Witte|first=Stephen P.|date=1992|title=Context, Text, Intertext: Toward a Constructivist Semiotic of Writing|journal=Written Communication|volume=9|issue=2|pages=237–308|doi=10.1177/0741088392009002003|s2cid=143717668}}</ref>
The precise characterization of communication is disputed. Many scholars have raised doubts that any single definition can capture the term accurately. These difficulties come from the fact that the term is applied to diverse phenomena in different contexts, often with slightly different meanings.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Dance|1970|pp=201–202}} | {{harvnb|Craig|1999|pp=[https://academic.oup.com/ct/article/9/2/119-161/4201776 119, 121–122, 133–134]}} }}</ref> The issue of the right definition affects the research process on many levels. This includes issues like which [[Empirical evidence|empirical phenomena]] are observed, how they are categorized, which [[hypotheses]] and laws are formulated as well as how systematic theories based on these steps are articulated.<ref>{{harvnb|Dance|1970|pp=201–203}}</ref>


The [[science|scientific study]] of communication can be divided into:
Some definitions are broad and encompass unconscious and non-human [[behavior]].<ref>{{harvnb|Dance|1970|pp=207–210}}</ref> Under a broad definition, many animals communicate within their own species and flowers communicate by signaling the location of nectar to bees through their colors and shapes.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Rosengren|2000|pp=1–2|loc=1.1 On communication}} | {{harvnb|Ketcham|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=IXznDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA100 100]}} }}</ref> Other definitions restrict communication to [[conscious]] interactions among human beings.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Dance|1970|pp=207–209}} | {{harvnb|Rosengren|2000|pp=1–2|loc=1.1 On communication}} }}</ref> Some approaches focus on the use of symbols and signs while others stress the role of understanding, interaction, power, or transmission of ideas. Various characterizations see the communicator's [[Intention|intent]] to send a message as a central component. In this view, the transmission of information is not sufficient for communication if it happens unintentionally.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Dance|1970|pp=207–209}} | {{harvnb|Miller|1966|pp=[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00020.x 92–93]}} }}</ref> A version of this view is given by philosopher [[Paul Grice]], who identifies communication with [[Action (philosophy)|actions]] that aim to make the recipient aware of the communicator's intention.<ref>{{harvnb|Blackburn|1996|loc=[https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/communication-and-intention/v-1 Intention and communication]}}</ref> One question in this regard is whether only successful transmissions of information should be regarded as communication.<ref>{{harvnb|Dance|1970|pp=208–209}}</ref> For example, distortion may interfere with and change the actual message from what was originally intended.<ref>{{harvnb|Munodawafa|2008|pp=369–370}}</ref> A closely related problem is whether acts of deliberate [[deception]] constitute communication.<ref>{{harvnb|Dance|1970|p=209}}</ref>
* [[Information theory]] which studies the quantification, storage, and communication of information in general;
* [[Communication studies]] which concerns human communication;
* [[Biosemiotics]] which examines communication in and between living organisms in general.
* [[Biocommunication (science)|Biocommunication]] which exemplifies sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms of all domains of life, including viruses.


Communication can be realized [[visual communication|visually]] (through images and [[Writing|written]] language), through [[sound|auditory]], [[Somatosensory system|tactile]]/[[Haptic communication|haptic]] (e.g. [[Braille]] or other physical means), [[olfactory]], [[electromagnetism|electromagnetic]], or [[biochemistry|biochemical]] means (or any combination thereof). Human communication is unique for its extensive use of [[language|abstract language]].
According to a broad definition by literary critic [[I.&nbsp;A. Richards]], communication happens when one [[mind]] acts upon its environment to transmit its own [[experience]] to another mind.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Nöth|2013|p=101}} | {{harvnb|Lyon|1998|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fWPiCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT31 31]}} | {{harvnb|Nöth|1995|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rHA4KQcPeNgC&pg=PA172 172]}} }}</ref> Another interpretation is given by communication theorists [[Claude Shannon]] and [[Warren Weaver]], who characterize communication as a transmission of information brought about by the interaction of several components, such as a source, a message, an encoder, a channel, a decoder, and a receiver.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|US congress, Office of Technology Assessment|1990|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=BVVdQdURPXsC&pg=PA31 31]}} | {{harvnb|Skyttner|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=7tvICgAAQBAJ&pg=PA207 207]}} }}</ref> The transmission view is rejected by transactional and constitutive views, which hold that communication is not just about the transmission of information but also about the creation of meaning. Transactional and constitutive perspectives hold that communication shapes the participant's experience by conceptualizing the world and making sense of their environment and themselves.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Barnlund|2013|p=48}}  |2={{harvnb|Nicotera|2009|pp=176, 179}}  |3={{harvnb|ISU staff|2016|loc=[http://kell.indstate.edu/public-comm-intro/chapter/3-4-functions-of-verbal-communication/ 3.4: Functions of Verbal Communication]}} |4={{harvnb|Reisinger|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=pfQifDukxegC&pg=PA166 166–167]}} |5={{harvnb|National Communication Association|2016}} |6={{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 438]|loc=transmission models}} }}</ref> Researchers studying animal and plant communication focus less on meaning-making. Instead, they often define communicative behavior as having other features, such as playing a beneficial role in survival and reproduction, or having an observable response.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|pp=1, 3}} | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=7}} | {{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=5}} }}</ref>


==Types==
==Models of communication==
===Non-verbal communication===
{{main|Models of communication}}
{{Main|Nonverbal communication}}
Models of communication are [[concept]]ual representations of the process of communication.<ref>{{harvnb|Ruben|2001|pp=[https://www.encyclopedia.com/media/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/models-communication 607–608]|loc=Models Of Communication}}</ref> Their goal is to provide a simplified overview of its main components. This makes it easier for researchers to formulate hypotheses, apply communication-related concepts to real-world cases, and test [[prediction]]s.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|McQuail|2008|pp=[https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+International+Encyclopedia+of+Communication%2C+12+Volume+Set-p-9781405131995 3143–3149]|loc=Models of communication}} | {{harvnb|Narula|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=AuRyXwyAJ78C 23]|loc=1. Basic Communication Models}} }}</ref> Due to their simplified presentation, they may lack the conceptual complexity needed for a comprehensive understanding of all the essential aspects of communication. They are usually presented visually in the form of [[diagram]]s showing the basic components and their interaction.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|McQuail|2008|pp=[https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+International+Encyclopedia+of+Communication%2C+12+Volume+Set-p-9781405131995 3143–3149]|loc=Models of communication}} | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016a|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ 1.2 The Communication Process]}} | {{harvnb|Cobley|Schulz|2013|pp=[https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110240450/html 7–8]|loc=Introduction}} }}</ref>
[[Nonverbal communication]] explains the processes that convey a type of information in a form of non-linguistic representations. Examples of nonverbal communication include [[haptic communication]], [[Chronemics|chronemic communication]], [[gestures]], [[body language]], [[facial expressions]], [[eye contact]] etc. Nonverbal communication also relates to the intent of a message. Examples of intent are voluntary, intentional movements like shaking a hand or winking, as well as involuntary, such as sweating.<ref>{{cite web|title = Types of Body Language|url = http://www.simplybodylanguage.com/types-of-body-language.html|website = Simplybodylanguage.com|access-date = 2016-02-08}}</ref> Speech also contains nonverbal elements known as [[paralanguage]], e.g. [[rhythm (linguistics)|rhythm]], [[intonation (linguistics)|intonation]], [[tempo of speech|tempo]], and [[Stress (linguistics)|stress]]. It affects communication most at the subconscious level and establishes trust. Likewise, written texts include nonverbal elements such as handwriting style, the spatial arrangement of words and the use of [[emoticon]]s to convey emotion.


Nonverbal communication demonstrates one of [[Paul Watzlawick|Paul Watzlawick's]] laws: you cannot not communicate. Once proximity has formed awareness, living creatures begin interpreting any signals received.<ref>Wazlawick, Paul (1970's) opus</ref> Some of the functions of nonverbal communication in humans are to complement and illustrate, to reinforce and emphasize, to replace and substitute, to control and regulate, and to contradict the denotative message.
Models of communication are often categorized based on their intended applications and how they conceptualize communication. Some models are general in the sense that they are intended for all forms of communication. Specialized models aim to describe specific forms, such as models of [[mass communication]].<ref>{{harvnb|Fiske|2011a|pp=[https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 24, 30]|loc=2. Other models}}</ref>


Nonverbal cues are heavily relied on to express communication and to interpret others' communication and can replace or substitute verbal messages.
One influential way to classify communication is to distinguish between linear transmission, interaction, and transaction models.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|McQuail|2008|pp=[https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+International+Encyclopedia+of+Communication%2C+12+Volume+Set-p-9781405131995 3143–3149]|loc=Models of communication}} | {{harvnb|Narula|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=AuRyXwyAJ78C 15]|loc=1. Basic Communication Models}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 438]|loc=transmission models}} }}</ref> Linear transmission models focus on how a sender transmits [[information]] to a receiver. They are ''linear'' because this flow of information only goes in a single direction.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016a|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ 1.2 The Communication Process]}} | {{harvnb|Kastberg|2019|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=esLDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA56 56]}} | {{harvnb|Fielding|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=2Z_vIcp9gaEC&pg=PA24 24]}} }}</ref> This view is rejected by interaction models, which include a [[feedback]] loop. Feedback is needed to describe many forms of communication, such as a conversation, where the listener may respond to a speaker by expressing their opinion or by asking for clarification. Interaction models represent the process as a form of [[two-way communication]] in which the communicators take turns sending and receiving messages.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|UMN staff|2016a|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ 1.2 The Communication Process]}} |2={{harvnb|Kastberg|2019|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=esLDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA56 56]}} |3={{harvnb|Nicotera|2009|p=176}} |4={{harvnb|Fielding|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=2Z_vIcp9gaEC&pg=PA24 24]}} }}</ref> Transaction models further refine this picture by allowing representations of sending and responding at the same time. This modification is needed to describe how the listener can give feedback in a face-to-face conversation while the other person is talking. Examples are [[Non-verbal communication|non-verbal feedback]] through [[body posture]] and [[facial expression]]. Transaction models also hold that meaning is produced during communication and does not exist independently of it.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016a|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ 1.2 The Communication Process]}} | {{harvnb|Nicotera|2009|p=176}} | {{harvnb|Barnlund|2013|p=48}} }}</ref>


There are several reasons as to why non-verbal communication plays a vital role in communication:
[[File:Lasswell's model of communication.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|alt=Diagram showing the five components of Lasswell's model: communicator, message, medium, recipient, and effect|Lasswell's model of communication, which is based on five questions corresponding to five basic components]]
All the early models, developed in the middle of the 20th century, are linear transmission models. [[Lasswell's model]], for example, is based on five fundamental questions: "Who?", "Says what?", "In which channel?", "To whom?", and "With what effect?".<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Fiske|2011a|pp=[https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 30–31]|loc=2. Other models}} | {{harvnb|Watson|Hill|2012|p=154|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=XKP-63dSKNsC&pg=PA154 Lasswell's model of communication]}} | {{harvnb|Wenxiu|2015|pp=245–249}} }}</ref> The goal of these questions is to identify the basic components involved in the communicative process: the sender, the message, the [[Communication channel|channel]], the [[Receiver (information theory)|receiver]], and the effect.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Steinberg|2007|pp=52–53}} | {{harvnb|Tengan|Aigbavboa|Thwala|2021|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8nQhEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT110 110]}} | {{harvnb|Berger|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=AfTl2r4K_wUC&pg=PA12 12–13]}} }}</ref> Lasswell's model was initially only conceived as a model of mass communication, but it has been applied to other fields as well. Some communication theorists, like Richard Braddock, have expanded it by including additional questions, like "Under what circumstances?" and "For what purpose?".<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Sapienza|Iyer|Veenstra|2015|loc=§Misconception 1: it's a static model with fixed categories}} | {{harvnb|Feicheng|2022|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=E4pyEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA24 24]}} | {{harvnb|Braddock|1958|pp=88–93}} }}</ref>


"Non-verbal communication is omnipresent."<ref>(Burgoon, J., Guerrero, L., Floyd, K., (2010). Nonverbal Communication, Taylor & Francis. p. 3 )</ref> They are included in every single communication act. To have total communication, all non-verbal channels such as the body, face, voice, appearance, touch, distance, timing, and other environmental forces must be engaged during face-to-face interaction. Written communication can also have non-verbal attributes. E-mails, web chats, and the social media have options to change text font colours, stationery, add emoticons, capitalization, and pictures in order to capture non-verbal cues into a verbal medium.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Martin-Rubió|first=Xavier|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SupwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA9|title=Contextualising English as a Lingua Franca: From Data to Insights|date=2018-09-30|publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing|isbn=978-1-5275-1696-0|language=en}}</ref>
[[File:Shannon-Weaver model of communication.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|alt=Diagram of the Shannon–Weaver model showing the different steps of a message on its way to the destination|Shannon–Weaver model of communication, which focuses on how a message is first translated into a [[signal]] and then back into a message]]
The [[Shannon–Weaver model]] is another influential linear transmission model.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|McQuail|2008|pp=[https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+International+Encyclopedia+of+Communication%2C+12+Volume+Set-p-9781405131995 3143–3149]|loc=Models of communication}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 387]|loc=Shannon and Weaver's model}} | {{harvnb|Li|2007|pp=5439–5442}} }}</ref> It is based on the idea that a source creates a message, which is then translated into a [[signal]] by a transmitter. [[Noise]] may interfere with and distort the signal. Once the signal reaches the receiver, it is translated back into a message and made available to the destination. For a landline telephone call, the person calling is the source and their telephone is the transmitter. The transmitter translates the message into an electrical signal that travels through the wire, which acts as the channel. The person taking the call is the destination and their telephone is the receiver.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 387]|loc=Shannon and Weaver's model}} | {{harvnb|Fiske|2011|pp=[https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 6–10]|loc=1. Communication theory}} | {{harvnb|Shannon|1948|pp=380–382}} }}</ref> The Shannon–Weaver model includes an in-depth discussion of how noise can distort the signal and how successful communication can be achieved despite noise. This can happen by making the message partially [[Redundancy (information theory)|redundant]] so that decoding is possible nonetheless.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Fiske|2011|pp=[https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 10–15]|loc=1. Communication theory}} | {{harvnb|Weaver|1998|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fRrvAAAAMAAJ 4–9, 18–19]|loc=Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication}} | {{harvnb|Januszewski|2001|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mlZsIIoOaSYC&pg=PA29 29]}} }}</ref> Other influential linear transmission models include [[Models of communication#Gerbner|Gerbner's model]] and [[Source-Message-Channel-Receiver model of communication|Berlo's model]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Watson|Hill|2012|pp=112–113|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=XKP-63dSKNsC&pg=PA112 Gerbner's model of communication]}} | {{harvnb|Melkote|Steeves|2001|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=PKAi6t2e5AEC&pg=PA108 108]}} | {{harvnb|Straubhaar|LaRose|Davenport|2015|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jUR-BAAAQBAJ&pg=PT47 18–19]}} }}</ref>


"Non-verbal behaviours are multifunctional."<ref name="Burgoon et al., p. 4">(Burgoon et al., p. 4)</ref> Many different non-verbal channels are engaged at the same time in communication acts and allow the chance for simultaneous messages to be sent and received.
[[File:Schramm's model of communication.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|alt=Diagram of the feedback loop in Schramm's model of communication|Schramm's model of communication, which focuses on the processes of encoding and decoding as well as feedback]]
The earliest interaction model was developed by communication theorist [[Wilbur Schramm]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Nicotera|2009|p=176}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA18 18]}} | {{harvnb|Bowman|Targowski|1987|pp=25–26}} }}</ref> He states that communication starts when a source has an idea and expresses it in the form of a message. This process is called ''encoding'' and happens using a [[code]], i.e. a [[sign system]] that is able to express the idea, for instance, through [[Visual communication|visual]] or auditory signs.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Nicotera|2009|p=176}} | {{harvnb|Wisely|1994|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=icMsdAGHQpEC&pg=PA90 90–91]}} | {{harvnb|Schramm|1954|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=z2aaAQAACAAJ 3–5]|loc=How communication works}} }}</ref> The message is sent to a destination, who has to decode and interpret it to understand it.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Schramm|1954|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=z2aaAQAACAAJ 3–5]|loc=How communication works}} | {{harvnb|Blythe|2009|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rPgQRbBLdYgC&pg=188 188]}} }}</ref> In response, they formulate their own idea, encode it into a message, and send it back as a form of feedback. Another innovation of [[Schramm's model]] is that previous experience is necessary to be able to encode and decode messages. For communication to be successful, the fields of experience of source and destination have to overlap.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Wisely|1994|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=icMsdAGHQpEC&pg=PA90 90–91]}} | {{harvnb|Meng|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=b0HWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA120 120]}} | {{harvnb|Schramm|1954|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=z2aaAQAACAAJ 5–7]|loc=How communication works}} }}</ref>


"Non-verbal behaviours may form a universal language system."<ref name="Burgoon et al., p. 4"/> Smiling, crying, pointing, caressing, and glaring are non-verbal behaviours that are used and understood by people regardless of nationality. Such non-verbal signals allow the most basic form of communication when verbal communication is not effective due to language barriers.
The first transactional model was proposed by communication theorist [[Barnlund's model of communication|Dean Barnlund]] in 1970.<ref>{{harvnb|Hamilton|Kroll|Creel|2023|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=3L2uEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT46 46]}}</ref> He understands communication as "the production of meaning, rather than the production of messages".<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Nicotera|2009|p=176}} | {{harvnb|Barnlund|2013|p=48}} }}</ref> Its goal is to decrease uncertainty and arrive at a shared [[understanding]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Barnlund|2013|p=47}} | {{harvnb|Watson|Hill|2015|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=IdGBCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA20 20–22]}} | {{harvnb|Lawson|Gill|Feekery|Witsel|2019|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fIOWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 76–77]}} }}</ref> This happens in response to external and internal cues. Decoding is the process of ascribing meaning to them and encoding consists in producing new [[Human behavior|behavioral]] cues as a response.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Watson|Hill|2015|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=IdGBCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA20 20–22]}} | {{harvnb|Dwyer|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=xhHiBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA12 12]}} | {{harvnb|Barnlund|2013|pp=57–60}} }}</ref>


When verbal messages contradict non-verbal messages, observation of non-verbal behaviour is relied on to judge another's attitudes and feelings, rather than assuming the truth of the verbal message alone.
==Human==
There are many forms of [[human communication]]. A central distinction is whether language is used, as in the contrast between verbal and non-verbal communication. A further distinction concerns whether one communicates with others or with oneself, as in the contrast between [[interpersonal communication|interpersonal]] and [[intrapersonal communication]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=58}} | {{harvnb|Burton|Dimbleby|2002|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=4XGKAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA126 126]}} | {{harvnb|Sinding|Waldstrom|2014|p=153}} }}</ref> Forms of human communication are also categorized by their channel or the medium used to transmit messages.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 44]|loc=channels}} | {{harvnb|Fiske|2011|pp=[https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 17–18]|loc=1. Communication theory}} }}</ref> The field studying human communication is known as anthroposemiotics.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Beynon-Davies|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZnaGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA52 52]}} | {{harvnb|Bussmann|2006|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=O0-9Iw0Qh6EC&pg=PA65 65–66]}} }}</ref>


===Verbal communication===
=== Verbal ===
[[Verbal communication]] is the spoken or written conveyance of a message. [[Human communication|Human]] [[language]] can be defined as a [[system]] of [[symbol]]s (also known as [[lexeme]]s) and the [[grammar]]s ([[wikt:rule|rules]]) by which the symbols are manipulated. The word "language" also refers to common properties of languages. [[Language acquisition|Language learning]] normally occurs most intensively during human childhood. Most of the large number of human languages use patterns of [[sound]] or [[gesture]] for symbols which enable communication with others around them. Languages tend to share certain properties, although there are exceptions. [[Constructed language]]s such as [[Esperanto]], [[programming language]]s, and various mathematical formalisms are not necessarily restricted to the properties shared by human languages.
{{Main|Linguistics}}
Verbal communication is the exchange of messages in [[Linguistics|linguistic]] form, i.e., by means of [[language]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=448}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2000|pp=58–59}} }}</ref> In colloquial usage, verbal communication is sometimes restricted to [[oral communication]] and may exclude writing and sign language. However, in academic discourse, the term is usually used in a wider sense, encompassing any form of linguistic communication, whether through speech, writing, or gestures.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=448}} | {{harvnb|Kyle|Kyle|Woll|Pullen|1988|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Gcy4MhmLhdkC&pg=PA59 59]}} | {{harvnb|Butterfield|2016|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VAJVDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 2–3]}} }}</ref> Some of the challenges in distinguishing verbal from non-verbal communication come from the difficulties in defining what exactly ''language'' means. Language is usually understood as a conventional system of [[symbol]]s and rules used for communication. Such systems are based on a set of simple units of meaning that can be combined to express more complex ideas. The rules for combining the units into compound expressions are called [[grammar]]. [[Word]]s are combined to form [[Sentence (linguistics)|sentences]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Lyons|1981|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8Wg57a3DdYYC 3, 6]}} | {{harvnb|Harley|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=bIsMKQEACAAJ 5–6]}} }}</ref>


As previously mentioned, language can be characterized as symbolic. Charles Ogden and I.A Richards developed The Triangle of Meaning model to explain the symbol (the relationship between a word), the referent (the thing it describes), and the meaning (the thought associated with the word and the thing).
One hallmark of human language, in contrast to animal communication, lies in its complexity and expressive power. Human language can be used to refer not just to [[concrete object]]s in the here-and-now but also to spatially and temporally distant objects and to [[Abstract object|abstract ideas]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|pp=11, 13–14}} | {{harvnb|Kiggins|Comins|Gentner|2013}} }}</ref> Humans have a natural tendency to [[Critical period hypothesis|acquire their native language in childhood]]. They are also able to learn other languages later in life as [[second language]]s. However, this process is less intuitive and often does not result in the same level of [[linguistic competence]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Meisel|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=3ryG0_W4qxcC 1]}} | {{harvnb|Montrul|2004|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nIRgMn83Rr8C&pg=PA20 20]}} }}</ref> The academic discipline studying language is called ''linguistics''. Its subfields include [[semantics]] (the study of meaning), [[Morphology (linguistics)|morphology]] (the study of word formation), [[syntax]] (the study of sentence structure), [[pragmatics]] (the study of language use), and [[phonetics]] (the study of basic sounds).<ref>{{harvnb|Harley|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=bIsMKQEACAAJ 5–6]}}</ref>


Communicators' diverse efforts to produce and interpret meaning in language are functionally constrained by that language's prototypical [[phonology]] (sounds that typically appear in a language), [[Morphology (linguistics)|morphology]] (what counts as a word), [[syntax]] (word-order), [[semantics]] (conventional meaning of words), and [[pragmatics]] (which meanings are conventional to which contexts).
A central contrast among languages is between [[Natural language|natural]] and artificial or [[constructed language]]s. Natural languages, like [[English language|English]], [[Spanish language|Spanish]], and [[Japanese language|Japanese]], developed naturally and for the most part unplanned in the course of history. Artificial languages, like [[Esperanto]], [[Quenya]], [[C++]], and the language of [[first-order logic]], are purposefully designed from the ground up.<ref>{{harvnb|Thomason|2006|pp=[https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/artificial-and-natural-languages 342–345]|loc=Artificial And Natural Languages}}</ref> Most everyday verbal communication happens using natural languages. Central forms of verbal communication are speech and writing together with their counterparts of listening and reading.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Champoux|2016|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=5Hq3DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA327 327–328]}} | {{harvnb|Berlo|1960|pp=41–42}} }}</ref> Spoken languages use sounds to produce [[sign]]s and transmit meaning while for writing, the signs are physically inscribed on a surface.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Champoux|2016|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=5Hq3DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA327 327–328]}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2009|p=306}} | {{harvnb|Kyle|Kyle|Woll|Pullen|1988|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Gcy4MhmLhdkC&pg=PA59 59]}} }}</ref> [[Sign languages]], like [[American Sign Language]] and [[Nicaraguan Sign Language]], are another form of verbal communication. They rely on visual means, mostly by using gestures with hands and arms, to form sentences and convey meaning.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Champoux|2016|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=5Hq3DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA327 327–328]}} | {{harvnb|Kyle|Kyle|Woll|Pullen|1988|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Gcy4MhmLhdkC&pg=PA59 59]}} }}</ref>


The meanings that are attached to words can be literal, or otherwise known as denotative; relating to the topic being discussed, or, the meanings take context and relationships into account, otherwise known as connotative; relating to the feelings, history, and power dynamics of the communicators.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ferguson |first1=Sherry Devereaux |last2=Lennox-Terrion |first2=Jenepher |last3=Ahmed |first3=Rukhsana |last4=Jaya |first4=Peruvemba |year=2014 |title=Communication in Everyday Life: Personal and Professional Contexts |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HZFXngEACAAJ |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=Canada |page=464 |isbn=9780195449280}}</ref>
Verbal communication serves various functions. One key function is to exchange information, i.e. an attempt by the speaker to make the audience aware of something, usually of an external event. But language can also be used to express the speaker's feelings and attitudes. A closely related role is to establish and maintain social relations with other people. Verbal communication is also utilized to coordinate one's behavior with others and influence them. In some cases, language is not employed for an external purpose but only for [[entertainment]] or personal enjoyment.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2000|pp=58–59}} | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=6}} | {{harvnb|Berlo|1960|pp=7–8}} }}</ref> Verbal communication further helps individuals [[conceptualize]] the world around them and themselves. This affects how perceptions of external events are interpreted, how things are categorized, and how ideas are organized and related to each other.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|ISU staff|2016|loc=[http://kell.indstate.edu/public-comm-intro/chapter/3-4-functions-of-verbal-communication/ 3.4: Functions of Verbal Communication]}} | {{harvnb|Nuyts|Pederson|1999|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=k_ZqqaYrftAC&pg=PA1 1]}} }}</ref>


Contrary to popular belief, [[signed languages]] of the world (e.g., [[American Sign Language]]) are considered to be verbal communication because their sign vocabulary, grammar, and other linguistic structures abide by all the necessary classifications as spoken languages. There are however, nonverbal elements to signed languages, such as the speed, intensity, and size of signs that are made. A signer might sign "yes" in response to a question, or they might sign a sarcastic-large slow yes to convey a different nonverbal meaning. The sign yes is the verbal message while the other movements add nonverbal meaning to the message.
=== Non-verbal ===
{{Main|Non-verbal communication}}
[[File:Hermandad - friendship.jpg|thumb|alt=Photo of a handshake|[[Handshake|Shaking hands]] is one form of non-verbal communication.]]
Non-verbal communication is the exchange of information through non-linguistic modes, like facial expressions, [[gesture]]s, and [[Human position|postures]].<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|p=492}}</ref> However, not every form of non-verbal behavior constitutes non-verbal communication. Some theorists, like [[Judee K. Burgoon|Judee Burgoon]], hold that it depends on the existence of a socially shared coding system that is used to interpret the meaning of non-verbal behavior.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=690}}</ref> Non-verbal communication has many functions. It frequently contains information about emotions, attitudes, personality, interpersonal relations, and private thoughts.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=107}} | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=690}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=297}} }}</ref>


====Written communication and its historical development====
Non-verbal communication often happens unintentionally and unconsciously, like [[sweating]] or [[blushing]], but there are also conscious intentional forms, like shaking hands or [[Thumb signal|raising a thumb]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=297}} | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=690}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|p=493}} }}</ref> It often happens simultaneously with verbal communication and helps optimize the exchange through emphasis and illustration or by adding additional information. Non-verbal cues can clarify the intent behind a verbal message.<ref>{{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=107}}</ref> Using multiple [[Modality (semiotics)|modalities]] of communication in this way usually makes communication more effective if the messages of each modality are consistent.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=691}} | {{harvnb|Taylor|1962|pp=[https://www.jstor.org/stable/43093688 8–10]}} }}</ref> However, in some cases different modalities can contain conflicting messages. For example, a person may verbally agree with a statement but press their lips together, thereby indicating disagreement non-verbally.<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|p=493}}</ref>
Over time the forms of and ideas about communication have evolved through the continuing progression of technology. Advances include communications psychology and [[media psychology]], an emerging field of study.


The progression of written communication can be divided into three "information communication revolutions":<ref>{{cite web|author=Xin Li|title=Complexity Theory – the Holy Grail of 21st Century|url=http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~xinl/complexity.html|publisher=Lane Dept of CSEE, West Virginia University|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130815234045/http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~xinl/complexity.html|archive-date=2013-08-15}}</ref>
There are many forms of non-verbal communication. They include [[kinesics]], [[proxemics]], [[Haptic communication|haptics]], [[paralanguage]], [[chronemics]], and physical appearance.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|pp=692–694}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=297}} }}</ref> Kinesics studies the role of bodily behavior in conveying information. It is commonly referred to as [[body language]], even though it is, strictly speaking, not a language but rather non-verbal communication. It includes many forms, like gestures, postures, walking styles, and dance.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=690}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=297}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|pp=493–495}} }}</ref> Facial expressions, like laughing, smiling, and frowning, all belong to kinesics and are expressive and flexible forms of communication.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=693}}</ref> Oculesics is another subcategory of kinesics in regard to the eyes. It covers questions like how eye contact, gaze, blink rate, and pupil dilation form part of communication.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=692}}</ref> Some kinesic patterns are inborn and involuntary, like blinking, while others are learned and voluntary, like giving a [[military salute]].<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|p=493}}</ref>


# Written communication first emerged through the use of pictographs. The [[pictogram]]s were made in stone, hence written communication was not yet mobile. Pictograms began to develop standardized and simplified forms.
Proxemics studies how personal space is used in communication. The distance between the speakers reflects their degree of familiarity and intimacy with each other as well as their social status.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=692}}</ref> Haptics examines how information is conveyed using touching behavior, like handshakes, holding hands, kissing, or slapping. Meanings linked to haptics include care, concern, anger, and violence. For instance, handshaking is often seen as a symbol of equality and fairness, while refusing to shake hands can indicate aggressiveness. Kissing is another form often used to show affection and erotic closeness.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=692}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|p=494}} }}</ref>
# The next step occurred when writing began to appear on [[paper]], papyrus, clay, wax, and other media with commonly shared writing systems, leading to adaptable [[alphabet]]s. Communication became mobile.
# The final stage is characterized by the transfer of information through controlled waves of [[electromagnetic radiation]] (i.e., radio, microwave, infrared) and other [[Signal (electrical engineering)|electronic signals]].


Communication is thus a process by which meaning is assigned and conveyed in an attempt to create shared understanding. Gregory Bateson called it "the replication of tautologies in the universe.<ref>Bateson, Gregory (1960). ''Steps to an Ecology of Mind''.</ref> This process, which requires a vast repertoire of skills in [[interpersonal]] processing, listening, observing, speaking, questioning, analyzing, gestures, and evaluating enables [[collaboration]] and [[cooperation]].<ref>{{cite web| title=communication| work=The office of superintendent of Public Instruction| location=Washington}}</ref>{{Full citation needed|date=May 2021}}
Paralanguage, also known as vocalics, encompasses non-verbal elements in speech that convey information. Paralanguage is often used to express the feelings and emotions that the speaker has but does not explicitly state in the verbal part of the message. It is not concerned with the words used but with how they are expressed. This includes elements like articulation, lip control, rhythm, intensity, pitch, fluency, and loudness.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=694}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=297}} | {{harvnb|Papa|Daniels|Spiker|2008|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=00m0QPQ07H0C&pg=PA27 27]}} }}</ref> For example, saying something loudly and in a high pitch conveys a different meaning on the non-verbal level than whispering the same words. Paralanguage is mainly concerned with spoken language but also includes aspects of written language, like the use of colors and fonts as well as spatial arrangement in paragraphs and tables.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=310}} | {{harvnb|Papa|Daniels|Spiker|2008|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=00m0QPQ07H0C&pg=PA27 27]}} }}</ref> Non-linguistic sounds may also convey information; [[crying]] indicates that an infant is distressed, and [[babbling]] conveys information about infant health and well-being.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|McCormack|McLeod|Harrison|2017|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=pdAoDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA60 60]}} | {{harvnb|Bornstein|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nyZpbi4IiSoC&pg=PA151 151]}} }}</ref>


==Communication models==
Chronemics concerns the use of time, such as what messages are sent by being on time versus late for a meeting.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|pp=692–693}}</ref> The physical appearance of the communicator, such as height, weight, hair, skin color, gender, clothing, tattooing, and piercing, also carries information.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|pp=693–694}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|p=492}} }}</ref> Appearance is an important factor for first impressions but is more limited as a mode of communication since it is less changeable.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|pp=693–694}}</ref> Some forms of non-verbal communication happen using such artifacts as drums, smoke, batons, traffic lights, and flags.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Givens|White|2021|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=UhgoEAAAQBAJ 28, 55]}} | {{harvnb|Chan|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=CmXIDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA180 180]}} }}</ref>
{{Main|Models of communication}}


=== Lasswells Model of Communication ===
Non-verbal communication can also happen through visual [[Media (communication)|media]] like [[painting]]s and [[drawing]]s. They can express what a person or an object looks like and can also convey other ideas and emotions. In some cases, this type of non-verbal communication is used in combination with verbal communication, for example, when [[diagram]]s or [[map]]s employ labels to include additional linguistic information.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Krémer|Quijano|2017|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=6QVDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT121 121–122]}} | {{harvnb|du Plessis|Lowe|Smith|Sykes|2007|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ympNWY4wajAC&pg=PA124 124–216]}} | {{harvnb|Ongaro|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=uljwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA216 216]}} | {{harvnb|Jeanrond|1991|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=CzWxCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA7 7–8]}} }}</ref>
Harold Lasswell was a major theorist in the world of communications. However before then he was a political science student studying propaganda and public policy making at the University of Chicago studying under  Charles Merriam Professor of political science. He graduated from University of Chicago in 1922 and received  his PH.D in 1926. He completed his graduate studies from university of London, Paris, Berlin and Geneva. It was during his graduate studies he argued that the audience did not fully understand messages and did not make the most informed choices in the political sphere. He explored propaganda through his doctoral dissertation "Propaganda Technique In the World War " (1927) which has become a part of communication theory.<ref name="Lasswell 388–396">{{Cite journal |last=Lasswell |first=Harold D. |date=April 1936 |title=The Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences in Review''Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences''. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.46.3.2989274 |journal=The International Journal of Ethics |volume=46 |issue=3 |pages=388–396 |doi=10.1086/intejethi.46.3.2989274 |s2cid=144206130 |issn=1526-422X}}</ref>


He was a professor at Yale teaching law and political science from 1946 to 1970 as well at University of Chicago from 1922 to 1938. It was during his time at Yale, he developed the Laswell model of communication.
Traditionally, most research focused on verbal communication. However, this paradigm began to shift in the 1950s when research interest in non-verbal communication increased and emphasized its influence.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Clough|Duff|2020|p=323}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 244]|loc=Logocentrism}} | {{harvnb|Mills|2015|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ouHnCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT132 132–133]}} }}</ref> For example, many judgments about the nature and behavior of other people are based on non-verbal cues.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=690}}</ref> It is further present in almost every communicative act to some extent and certain parts of it are universally understood.<ref>{{harvnb|Burgoon|Manusov|Guerrero|2016|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=JqVYCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 3–4]}}</ref> These considerations have prompted some communication theorists, like [[Ray Birdwhistell]], to claim that the majority of ideas and information is conveyed this way.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013a|pp=492–493}} | {{harvnb|Giri|2009|pp=690–961}} }}</ref> It has also been suggested that human communication is at its core non-verbal and that words can only acquire meaning because of non-verbal communication.<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=691}}</ref> The earliest forms of human communication, such as crying and babbling, are non-verbal.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|McCormack|McLeod|Harrison|2017|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=pdAoDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA60 60]}} | {{harvnb|Bornstein|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nyZpbi4IiSoC&pg=PA151 151]}} }}</ref> Some basic forms of communication happen even before birth between mother and embryo and include information about nutrition and emotions.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Bowman|Arany|Wolfgang|2021|pp=1455–1456}} | {{harvnb|Bornstein|Suwalsky|Breakstone|2012|pp=113–116}} }}</ref> Non-verbal communication is studied in various fields besides communication studies, like linguistics, [[semiotics]], [[anthropology]], and [[social psychology]].<ref>{{harvnb|Giri|2009|p=690}}</ref>


He is considered to be one of the primary founders of communication theories, he has written 4 million to 6 million words in academic lifetime.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ascher |first1=William |last2=Muth |first2=Rodney |last3=Finley |first3=Mary M. |last4=Muth |first4=Marcia |date=September 1992 |title=Harold D. Lasswell: An Annotated Bibliography |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791617 |journal=Political Psychology |volume=13 |issue=3 |page=589 |doi=10.2307/3791617 |jstor=3791617 |issn=0162-895X}}</ref> He helped communications become a respected and legitimate study.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Berelson |first=Bernard |date=1959 |title=The State of Communication Research |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/266840 |journal=Public Opinion Quarterly |volume=23 |issue=1 |page=1 |doi=10.1086/266840 |issn=0033-362X}}</ref>
=== Interpersonal ===
{{main|Interpersonal communication}}
[[File:Kathy Matayoshi and Mazie Hirono.jpg|thumb|alt=Photo of two women talking|Kathy Matayoshi and [[Mazie Hirono]] conversing in the White House, an example of interpersonal communication]]
Interpersonal communication is communication between distinct people. Its typical form is [[dyadic communication]], i.e. between two people, but it can also refer to [[Group communication|communication within groups]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=221}} | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-1-communication-history-and-forms/ 1.1 Communication: History and Forms]}} | {{harvnb|Barnlund|2013|pp=52–53}} }}</ref> It can be planned or unplanned and occurs in many forms, like when greeting someone, during salary negotiations, or when making a phone call.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-1-communication-history-and-forms/ 1.1 Communication: History and Forms]}} | {{harvnb|Ezhilarasu|2016|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=kfbsDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA178 178]}} }}</ref> Some communication theorists, like Virginia M. McDermott, understand interpersonal communication as a [[fuzzy concept]] that manifests in degrees.<ref>{{harvnb|McDermott|2009|p=547}}</ref> In this view, an exchange varies in how interpersonal it is based on several factors. It depends on how many people are present, and whether it happens face-to-face rather than through telephone or email. A further factor concerns the relation between the communicators:<ref>{{harvnb|McDermott|2009|pp=547–548}}</ref> group communication and mass communication are less typical forms of interpersonal communication and some theorists treat them as distinct types.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-1-communication-history-and-forms/ 1.1 Communication: History and Forms]}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=168}} | {{harvnb|McDermott|2009|pp=547–548}} }}</ref>


Harold Lasswell is known for the Lasswell Model of communication, it is now used as an umbrella term for other models of communication due to its simplicities to allow for multiple and very different interpretations to theorize with. It was published in "The Structure and Function of Communication in Society" essay in 1948. Lasswell was thinking about mass media and the role radio played in the 1930s. It was extremely popular after the second world war.<ref name="Lasswell 388–396"/>
Interpersonal communication can be synchronous or asynchronous. For asynchronous communication, the parties take turns in sending and receiving messages. This occurs when exchanging letters or emails. For synchronous communication, both parties send messages at the same time.<ref>{{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=221}}</ref> This happens when one person is talking while the other person sends non-verbal messages in response signaling whether they agree with what is being said.<ref>{{harvnb|UMN staff|2016a|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ 1.2 The Communication Process]}}</ref> Some communication theorists, like Sarah Trenholm and Arthur Jensen, distinguish between content messages and relational messages. Content messages express the speaker's feelings toward the topic of discussion. Relational messages, on the other hand, demonstrate the speaker's feelings toward their relation with the other participants.<ref>{{harvnb|Trenholm|Jensen|2013|pp=36, 361}}</ref>


The Lasswell model is broken into five parts-the five W's, it focuses on the "who", "what", "whom", "which Channel" and "what effect". Lasswell brings up that there is three functions of communication, there is surveillance of the environment, correlation of components of society and cultural transmission between generation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wenxiu |first=Peng |date=2015-09-01 |title=Analysis of New Media Communication Based on Lasswell's "5W" Model |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n3p245 |journal=Journal of Educational and Social Research |doi=10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n3p245 |issn=2239-978X}}</ref>
Various theories of the function of interpersonal communication have been proposed. Some focus on how it helps people make sense of their world and create society. Others hold that its primary purpose is to understand why other people act the way they do and to adjust one's behavior accordingly.<ref>{{harvnb|McDermott|2009|pp=548–549}}</ref> A closely related approach is to focus on information and see interpersonal communication as an attempt to reduce uncertainty about others and external events.<ref>{{harvnb|McDermott|2009|p=549}}</ref> Other explanations understand it in terms of the [[needs]] it satisfies. This includes the needs of belonging somewhere, being included, being liked, maintaining relationships, and influencing the behavior of others.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|McDermott|2009|p=549}} | {{harvnb|Gamble|Gamble|2019|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=bUdeDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA14 14–16]}} }}</ref> On a practical level, interpersonal communication is used to coordinate one's actions with the actions of others to get things done.<ref>{{harvnb|McDermott|2009|p=546}}</ref> Research on interpersonal communication includes topics like how people build, maintain, and dissolve relationships through communication. Other questions are why people choose one message rather than another and what effects these messages have on the communicators and their relation. A further topic is how to predict whether two people would like each other.<ref>{{harvnb|McDermott|2009|pp=546–547}}</ref>


Who, Communication is not only one person, it is newspapers, websites, television stations and radio stations. This communication is developed by people who run this organized institutions, reporters, editors etc.
=== Intrapersonal ===
{{main|Intrapersonal communication}}
[[File:Helleu - Daydream.jpg|thumb|alt=Painting of a woman daydreaming|[[Paul César Helleu]]'s 1901 painting, ''Rêverie'' (Daydream) featuring [[Alice Guérin]]. Daydreaming is a form of intrapersonal communication.]]
Intrapersonal communication is communication with oneself.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ezhilarasu|2016|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=kfbsDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA178 178]}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=225}} | {{harvnb|Lantolf|2009|p=566}} }}</ref> In some cases this manifests externally, such as when engaged in a [[monologue]], taking notes, highlighting a passage, and writing a diary or a shopping list. But many forms of intrapersonal communication happen internally in the form of an inner exchange with oneself, as when thinking about something or [[daydreaming]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=225}} | {{harvnb|Honeycutt|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=9pbnBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT317 317]}} }}</ref> Closely related to intrapersonal communication is communication that takes place within an organism below the personal level, such as exchange of information between organs or cells.<ref>{{harvnb|Vocate|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fZOk5Fpuj54C&pg=PA196 196]}}</ref>


Says What, refers to analyzing and identifying the content that was given.
Intrapersonal communication can be triggered by internal and external stimuli. It may happen in the form of articulating a phrase before expressing it externally. Other forms are to make plans for the future and to attempt to process emotions to calm oneself down in stressful situations.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-1-communication-history-and-forms/ 1.1 Communication: History and Forms]}} | {{harvnb|Barnlund|2013|pp=47–52}} }}</ref> It can help regulate one's own mental activity and outward behavior as well as internalize cultural norms and ways of thinking.<ref>{{harvnb|Lantolf|2009|pp=567–568}}</ref> External forms of intrapersonal communication can aid one's memory. This happens, for example, when making a shopping list. Another use is to unravel difficult problems, as when solving a complex mathematical equation line by line. New knowledge can also be internalized this way, such as when repeating new vocabulary to oneself. Because of these functions, intrapersonal communication can be understood as "an exceptionally powerful and pervasive tool for thinking."<ref>{{harvnb|Lantolf|2009|pp=568–569}}</ref>


To Whom, who is the audience and how does the audience receive this information,
Based on its role in [[Self-control|self-regulation]], some theorists have suggested that intrapersonal communication is more basic than interpersonal communication. Young children sometimes use [[Private speech|egocentric speech]] while playing in an attempt to direct their own behavior. In this view, interpersonal communication only develops later when the child moves from their early egocentric perspective to a more social perspective.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Lantolf|2009|p=567}} | {{harvnb|Kreps|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=FrbGuo2mxCMC&pg=PA239 239]}} }}</ref> A different explanation holds that interpersonal communication is more basic since it is first used by parents to regulate what their child does. Once the child has learned this, they can apply the same technique to themselves to get more control over their own behavior.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Lantolf|2009|pp=567–568}} | {{harvnb|Vocate|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fZOk5Fpuj54C&pg=PA14 14]}} }}</ref>


Which Channel, refers to the media and how it is going to analyzed. The interactivity of Media
=== Channels ===
For communication to be successful, the message has to travel from the sender to the receiver. The ''channel'' is the way this is accomplished. It is not concerned with the meaning of the message but only with the technical means of how the meaning is conveyed.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 44]|loc=channels}} | {{harvnb|Fiske|2011|pp=[https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 17–18]|loc=1. Communication theory}} }}</ref> Channels are often understood in terms of the [[senses]] used to perceive the message, i.e. hearing, seeing, smelling, touching, and tasting.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 44]|loc=channels}} | {{harvnb|Berlo|1960|pp=63–9}} | {{harvnb|Gill|Adams|1998|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=qhXZU39BVJYC&pg=PA35 35–36]}} }}</ref> But in the widest sense, channels encompass any form of transmission, including technological means like books, cables, radio waves, telephones, or television.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 44]|loc=channels}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=168}} }}</ref> Naturally transmitted messages usually fade rapidly whereas some messages using artificial channels have a much longer lifespan, as in the case of books or sculptures.<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=168}}</ref>


What effect, refers to what is taken from this piece of information
The physical characteristics of a channel have an impact on the code and cues that can be used to express information. For example, typical telephone calls are restricted to the use of verbal language and paralanguage but exclude facial expressions. It is often possible to translate messages from one code into another to make them available to a different channel. An example is writing down a spoken message or expressing it using sign language.<ref>{{harvnb|Fiske|2011|p=[https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 20]}}</ref>


There are advantages as well as some critiques mentioned about the Lasswell Model. Some of the advantages are that the concept is easy and simple, it suits most types of communication and its the main concept of effect.
The transmission of information can occur through multiple channels at once. For example, face-to-face communication often combines the auditory channel to convey verbal information with the visual channel to transmit non-verbal information using gestures and facial expressions. Employing multiple channels can enhance the effectiveness of communication by helping the receiver better understand the subject matter.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Taylor|1962|pp=[https://www.jstor.org/stable/43093688 8–10]}} | {{harvnb|Turkington|Harris|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ePOh9jzjZqQC&pg=PA140 140]}} | {{harvnb|von Kriegstein|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=pRV1XsOyAc8C&pg=PA683 683]}} }}</ref> The choice of channels often matters since the receiver's ability to understand may vary depending on the chosen channel. For instance, a teacher may decide to present some information orally and other information visually, depending on the content and the student's preferred learning style. This underlines the role of a [[Media adequacy|media-adequate]] approach.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Berlo|1960|p=67}} | {{harvnb|Turkington|Harris|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ePOh9jzjZqQC&pg=PA140 140]}} | {{harvnb|Giessen|2015|pp=43–54}} }}</ref>


Some scholars believe that the Lasswell model of communication is no longer relevant, although at the time it was extremely significant. The critiques that have been brought up for the Lasswell model is the concept of feedback not mention, and the concept of noise is not mentioned. It was there where other theories started to come out to make up for the Lasswells method not having these factors in it, specially the Shannon and Weaver model. Another critique was that the Lasswell model is a linear model, it goes against other types of communications that show that it is more of a back and forth experience. It also does not mention power in the communication process.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sapienza |first1=Zachary S. |last2=Iyer |first2=Narayanan |last3=Veenstra |first3=Aaron S. |date=2015-09-03 |title=Reading Lasswell's Model of Communication Backward: Three Scholarly Misconceptions |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15205436.2015.1063666 |journal=Mass Communication and Society |language=en |volume=18 |issue=5 |pages=599–622 |doi=10.1080/15205436.2015.1063666 |s2cid=146389958 |issn=1520-5436}}</ref> Power was highlighted specially in Sturat Halls methods and concepts. Hall took parts from the Lasswell method and started reworking it to fit the idea of power in media, who has power and what message are they putting out. Hall examines how we view organizations and mass media and how they enforce certain meanings to appease their agenda.
=== Communicative competence ===
{{Main|Communicative competence}}
Communicative competence is the ability to communicate effectively or to choose the appropriate communicative behavior in a given situation.<ref>{{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|pp=20–21}}</ref> It concerns what to say, when to say it, and how to say it.<ref>{{harvnb|McArthur|McArthur|McArthur|2005|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=QMsWFsI0YkIC&pg=PT232 232–233]}}</ref> It further includes the ability to receive and understand messages.<ref>{{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=25}}</ref> [[Competence (polyseme)|Competence]] is often contrasted with [[Linguistic performance|performance]] since competence can be present even if it is not exercised, while performance consists in the realization of this competence.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Genesee|1984|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=U-05JSBtZF8C&pg=PA139 139]}} | {{harvnb|Peterwagner|2005|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=87BOMKSj1kcC&pg=PA9 9]}} | {{harvnb|McQuail|2008|p=[https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+International+Encyclopedia+of+Communication%2C+12+Volume+Set-p-9781405131995 3029]|loc=Models of communication}} }}</ref> However, some theorists reject a stark contrast and hold that performance is the observable part and is used to infer competence in relation to future performances.<ref>{{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|pp=17–18}}</ref>


=== Shannon and Weaver Model ===
Two central components of communicative competence are [[effectiveness]] and appropriateness.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|pp=20–21}} | {{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|p=241}} | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|pp=18, 25}} }}</ref> Effectiveness is the degree to which the speaker achieves their desired outcomes or the degree to which preferred alternatives are realized.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|p=23}} | {{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|p=241}} | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=25}} }}</ref> This means that whether a communicative behavior is effective does not just depend on the actual outcome but also on the speaker's intention, i.e. whether this outcome was what they intended to achieve. Because of this, some theorists additionally require that the speaker be able to give an explanation of why they engaged in one behavior rather than another.<ref>{{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|p=23}}</ref> Effectiveness is closely related to [[efficiency]], the difference being that effectiveness is about achieving goals while efficiency is about using few resources (such as time, effort, and money) in the process.<ref>{{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|p=241}}</ref>
[[File:Communication shannon-weaver2.svg|Shannon and Weaver Model of Communication|thumb]]
[[File:Communication emisor.jpg|Communication major dimensions scheme|thumb]]
[[File:Interaction comm model.svg|Interactional Model of Communication|thumb]]
[[File:Smcr.jpg|Berlo's Sender-Message-Channel-Receiver Model of Communication|thumb]]
[[File:Transactional comm model.jpg|Transactional model of communication|thumb]]
[[File:Encoding communication.jpg|Communication code scheme|thumb]]
[[File:Linear comm model.svg|Linear Communication Model|thumb]]


The first major model for communication was introduced by [[Claude Shannon]] and [[Warren Weaver]] for Bell Laboratories in 1949<ref>Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949). ''The mathematical theory of communication''. Urbana, Illinois: [[University of Illinois Press]]</ref> The original model was designed to mirror the functioning of radio and telephone technologies. Their initial model consisted of three primary parts: sender, channel, and receiver. The sender was the part of a telephone a person spoke into, the channel was the telephone itself, and the receiver was the part of the phone where one could hear the other person. Shannon and Weaver also recognized that often there is static that interferes with one listening to a telephone [[conversation]], which they deemed noise.
Appropriateness means that the communicative behavior meets social standards and expectations.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|p=23}} | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|pp=18, 25}} }}</ref> Communication theorist Brian H. Spitzberg defines it as "the perceived legitimacy or acceptability of behavior or enactments in a given context".<ref>{{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|p=241}}</ref> This means that the speaker is aware of the social and cultural context in order to adapt and express the message in a way that is considered acceptable in the given situation.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|p=23}} | {{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|p=238}} | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=18}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2009|p=70}} }}</ref> For example, to bid farewell to their teacher, a student may use the expression "Goodbye, sir" but not the expression "I gotta split, man", which they may use when talking to a peer.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2000|pp=59–60}} | {{harvnb|McArthur|McArthur|McArthur|2005|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=QMsWFsI0YkIC&pg=PT232 232–233]}} }}</ref> To be both effective and appropriate means to achieve one's preferred outcomes in a way that follows social standards and expectations.<ref>{{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=26}}</ref> Some definitions of communicative competence put their main emphasis on either effectiveness or appropriateness while others combine both features.<ref>{{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|pp=20–22}}</ref>


In a simple model, often referred to as the transmission model or standard view of communication, information or content (e.g. a message in [[natural language]]) is sent in some form (as [[spoken language]]) from an emitter (''emisor'' in the picture)/sender/encoder to a destination/receiver/decoder. This common conception of communication simply views communication as a means of sending and receiving information. The strengths of this model are simplicity, generality, and quantifiability. Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver structured this model based on the following elements:
Many additional components of communicative competence have been suggested, such as [[empathy]], control, flexibility, sensitivity, and knowledge.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Backlund|Morreale|2015|p=24}} | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|pp=19, 24}} }}</ref> It is often discussed in terms of the individual skills employed in the process, i.e. the specific behavioral components that make up communicative competence.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=24}} | {{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|p=242}} }}</ref> Message production skills include reading and writing. They are correlated with the reception skills of listening and reading.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=25}} | {{harvnb|Berlo|1960|pp=41–42}} }}</ref> There are both verbal and non-verbal communication skills.<ref>{{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=25}}</ref> For example, verbal communication skills involve the proper understanding of a language, including its [[phonology]], [[orthography]], syntax, [[lexicon]], and semantics.<ref>{{harvnb|McArthur|McArthur|McArthur|2005|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=QMsWFsI0YkIC&pg=PT232 232–233]}}</ref>
# An information source, which produces a message.
# A transmitter, which encodes the message into signals.
# A channel, to which signals are adapted for transmission.
# A noise source, which distorts the signal while it propagates through the channel.
# A receiver, which 'decodes' (reconstructs) the message from the signal.
# A destination, where the message arrives.


Shannon and Weaver argued that there were three levels of problems for communication within this theory.
Many aspects of human life depend on successful communication, from ensuring basic necessities of survival to building and maintaining relationships.<ref>{{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|pp=238–239}}</ref> Communicative competence is a key factor regarding whether a person is able to reach their goals in social life, like having a successful career and finding a suitable spouse.<ref>{{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=15}}</ref> Because of this, it can have a large impact on the individual's [[well-being]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Spitzberg|2015|pp=238–239}} | {{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=24}} }}</ref> The lack of communicative competence can cause problems both on the individual and the societal level, including professional, academic, and health problems.<ref>{{harvnb|Rickheit|Strohner|Vorwerg|2008|p=24}}</ref>
: The technical problem: how accurately can the message be transmitted?
: The semantic problem: how precisely is the meaning conveyed?
: The effectiveness problem: how effectively does the received meaning affect behavior?


[[Daniel Chandler]]<ref>[[Daniel Chandler]], "The Transmission Model of Communication", [http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/trans.html Aber.ac.uk] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100106130649/http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/trans.html|date=January 6, 2010}}</ref> critiques the transmission model by stating:
Barriers to effective communication can distort the message. They may result in failed communication and cause undesirable effects. This can happen if the message is poorly expressed because it uses terms with which the receiver is not familiar, or because it is not relevant to the receiver's needs, or because it contains too little or too much information. Distraction, [[selective perception]], and lack of attention to feedback may also be responsible.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Buchanan|Huczynski|2017|pp=218–219}} | {{harvnb|Fielding|2006|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=2Z_vIcp9gaEC&pg=PA20 20–21]}} }}</ref> Noise is another negative factor. It concerns influences that interfere with the message on its way to the receiver and distort it.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016a|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ 1.2 The Communication Process]}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C 296]|loc=noise}} }}</ref> Crackling sounds during a telephone call are one form of noise. [[Ambiguity|Ambiguous expressions]] can also inhibit effective communication and make it necessary to [[disambiguate]] between possible interpretations to discern the sender's intention.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|van Trijp|2018|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=oqhJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA289 289–290]}} | {{harvnb|Winner|2017|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=YBw0DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT29 29]}} }}</ref> These interpretations depend also on the [[Cross-cultural communication|cultural background of the participants]]. Significant cultural differences constitute an additional obstacle and make it more likely that messages are misinterpreted.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Blythe|2009|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rPgQRbBLdYgC&pg=188 188]}} | {{harvnb|Meng|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=b0HWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA120 120]}} | {{harvnb|Rao|2009|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fBHi4hEuDgYC 48]}} }}</ref>
: It assumes communicators are isolated individuals.
: No allowance for differing purposes.
: No allowance for differing interpretations.
: No allowance for unequal power relations.
: No allowance for situational contexts.


In 1960, David Berlo expanded on Shannon and Weaver's (1949) linear model of communication and created the SMCR Model of Communication.<ref>Berlo, D.K. (1960).'' The process of communication''. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.</ref> The Sender-Message-Channel-Receiver Model of communication separated the model into clear parts and has been expanded upon by other scholars.
==Other species==
{{See also|Biocommunication (science)|Biosemiotics}}
[[File:Howlsnow.jpg|thumb|upright=1|alt=Photo of a wolf howling|[[Wolf communication|Wolves communicate]] by [[howling]].]]
Besides human communication, there are many other forms of communication found in the animal kingdom and among plants. They are studied in fields like [[Biocommunication (science)|biocommunication]] and [[biosemiotics]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Emmeche|2003|pp=[https://www.encyclopedia.com/education/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/biosemiotics 63–64]}} | {{harvnb|UMN staff|2016|loc=[https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-1-communication-history-and-forms/ 1.1 Communication: History and Forms]}} | {{harvnb|Seckbach|Gordon|2016|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ycOkDQAAQBAJ&pg=PR15 xv–xvi]}} }}</ref> There are additional obstacles in this area for judging whether communication has taken place between two individuals. Acoustic signals are often easy to notice and analyze for scientists, but it is more difficult to judge whether tactile or chemical changes should be understood as communicative signals rather than as other biological processes.<ref>{{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=45}}</ref>


Communication is usually described along a few major dimensions: message (what type of things are communicated), source/emisor/sender/encoder (from whom), form (in which form), channel (through which [[Media (communication)|medium]]), destination/receiver/target/decoder (to whom). Wilbur Schram (1954) also indicated that we should also examine the impact that a message has (both desired and undesired) on the target of the message.<ref>Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. In W. Schramm (Ed.), ''The process and effects of communication'' (pp. 3–26). Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.</ref> Between parties, communication includes acts that confer knowledge and experiences, give advice and commands, and ask questions. These acts may take many forms, in one of the various manners of communication. The form depends on the abilities of the group communicating. Together, communication content and form make [[message]]s that are sent towards a destination. The target can be oneself, another [[Interpersonal Communication|person]] or being, another entity (such as a corporation or group of beings).
For this reason, researchers often use slightly altered definitions of communication to facilitate their work. A common assumption in this regard comes from [[evolutionary biology]] and holds that communication should somehow benefit the communicators in terms of [[natural selection]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|pp=1, 3}} | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=7}} }}</ref> The biologists Rumsaïs Blatrix and Veronika Mayer define communication as "the exchange of information between individuals, wherein both the signaller and receiver may expect to benefit from the exchange".<ref>{{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=128}}</ref> According to this view, the sender benefits by influencing the receiver's behavior and the receiver benefits by responding to the signal. These benefits should exist on average but not necessarily in every single case. This way, deceptive signaling can also be understood as a form of communication. One problem with the evolutionary approach is that it is often difficult to assess the impact of such behavior on natural selection.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=128}} | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=3}} }}</ref> Another common pragmatic constraint is to hold that it is necessary to observe a response by the receiver following the signal when judging whether communication has occurred.<ref>{{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=6}}</ref>


Communication can be seen as processes of [[information transmission]] with three levels of [[semiotic]] rules:
===Animals===
# [[Pragmatics|Pragmatic]] (concerned with the relations between signs/expressions and their users).
{{main|Animal communication}}
# [[Semantic]] (study of relationships between signs and symbols and what they represent).
Animal communication is the process of giving and taking information among animals.<ref>{{harvnb|Ruben|2002|pp=25–26}}</ref> The field studying animal communication is called [[zoosemiotics]].<ref>{{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=15}}</ref> There are many parallels to human communication. One is that humans and many animals express sympathy by synchronizing their movements and postures.<ref>{{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=107}}</ref> Nonetheless, there are also significant differences, like the fact that humans also engage in verbal communication, which uses language, while animal communication is restricted to non-verbal (i.e. non-linguistic) communication.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=15}} | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=1}} }}</ref> Some theorists have tried to distinguish human from animal communication based on the claim that animal communication lacks a [[Reference|referential function]] and is thus not able to refer to external phenomena. However, various observations seem to contradict this view, such as the warning signals in response to different types of predators used by [[vervet monkeys]], [[Gunnison's prairie dog]]s, and [[red squirrel]]s.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=13}} | {{harvnb|Hebb|Donderi|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-65mAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT269 269]}} }}</ref> A further approach is to draw the distinction based on the complexity of [[human language]], especially its almost limitless ability to combine basic units of meaning into more complex meaning structures. One view states that [[recursion]] sets human language apart from all non-human communicative systems.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=14}} | {{harvnb|Luuk|Luuk|2008|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=9S1pDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA206 206]}} }}</ref> Another difference is that human communication is frequently linked to the conscious intention to send information, which is often not discernable for animal communication.<ref>{{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=5}}</ref> Despite these differences, some theorists use the term "[[animal language]]" to refer to certain communicative patterns in animal behavior that have similarities with human language.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Houston|2019|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-hiBDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA266 266, 279]}} | {{harvnb|Baker|Hengeveld|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=R8uWDVdRQlYC&pg=PA25 25]}} }}</ref>
# [[Syntactic]] (formal properties of signs and symbols).
 
Therefore, communication is [[Interpersonal relationship|social interaction]] where at least two interacting agents share a common set of signs and a common set of [[semiotic]] rules. This commonly held rule in some sense ignores [[semiotics|autocommunication]], including [[intrapersonal communication]] via [[diary|diaries]] or self-talk, both secondary phenomena that followed the primary acquisition of communicative competences within social interactions.


In light of these weaknesses, Barnlund (2008) proposed a transactional model of communication.<ref>Barnlund, D.C. (2008). A transactional model of communication. In. C.D. Mortensen (Eds.), ''Communication theory'' (2nd ed., pp. 47–57). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction.</ref> The basic premise of the transactional model of communication is that individuals are simultaneously engaging in the sending and receiving of messages.
[[File:Lampyris noctiluca.jpg|thumb|alt=Photo of a glowing firefly|Many species of fireflies, such as the ''[[Lampyris noctiluca]]'', communicate with light to attract mates.]]
Animal communication can take a variety of forms, including visual, auditory, tactile, [[olfactic communication|olfactory]], and gustatory communication. Visual communication happens in the form of movements, gestures, facial expressions, and colors. Examples are movements seen during [[Courtship display|mating rituals]], the colors of birds, and the rhythmic light of [[fireflies]]. Auditory communication takes place through vocalizations by species like birds, [[primates]], and dogs. Auditory signals are frequently used to alert and warn. Lower-order living systems often have simple response patterns to auditory messages, reacting either by approach or avoidance.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002|p=26}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=15}} }}</ref> More complex response patterns are observed for higher animals, which may use different signals for different types of predators and responses. For example, some primates use one set of signals for airborne predators and another for land predators.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2000|pp=58–59}} | {{harvnb|Hebb|Donderi|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-65mAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT269 269]}} }}</ref> Tactile communication occurs through touch, [[vibrational communication|vibration]], stroking, rubbing, and pressure. It is especially relevant for parent-young relations, courtship, social greetings, and defense. Olfactory and gustatory communication happen chemically through smells and tastes, respectively.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002|p=26}} | {{harvnb|Chandler|Munday|2011|p=15}} }}</ref>


In a slightly more complex form a sender and a receiver are linked [[wikt:reciprocal|reciprocally]]. This second attitude of communication, referred to as the constitutive model or constructionist view, focuses on how an individual communicates as the determining factor of the way the message will be interpreted. Communication is viewed as a conduit; a passage in which information travels from one individual to another and this information becomes separate from the communication itself. A particular instance of communication is called a [[speech act]]. The sender's personal filters and the receiver's personal filters may vary depending upon different regional traditions, cultures, or gender; which may alter the intended meaning of message contents. In the presence of "[[noise|communication noise]]" on the transmission channel (air, in this case), reception and decoding of content may be faulty, and thus the speech act may not achieve the desired effect. One problem with this encode-transmit-receive-decode model is that the processes of encoding and decoding imply that the sender and receiver each possess something that functions as a [[codebook]], and that these two code books are, at the very least, similar if not identical. Although something like code books is implied by the model, they are nowhere represented in the model, which creates many conceptual difficulties.
There are large differences between species concerning what functions communication plays, how much it is realized, and the behavior used to communicate.<ref>{{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=2}}</ref> Common functions include the fields of [[courtship]] and mating, parent-offspring relations, social relations, navigation, self-defense, and [[territoriality]].<ref>{{harvnb|Ruben|2002|pp=26–29}}</ref> One part of courtship and mating consists in identifying and attracting potential mates. This can happen through various means. [[Grasshoppers]] and [[crickets]] communicate acoustically by using songs, [[moths]] rely on chemical means by releasing [[pheromones]], and fireflies send visual messages by flashing light.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002|pp=26–27}} | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=2}} }}</ref> For some species, the offspring depends on the parent for its survival. One central function of parent-offspring communication is to recognize each other. In some cases, the parents are also able to guide the offspring's behavior.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002|p=27}} | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|pp=19–20}} }}</ref>


Theories of [[coregulation]] describe communication as a creative and dynamic continuous process, rather than a discrete exchange of information. Canadian media scholar [[Harold Innis]] had the theory that people use different types of media to communicate and which one they choose to use will offer different possibilities for the shape and durability of society.<ref name="Wark1997">{{Cite book|last=Wark|first=McKenzie|title=The Virtual Republic|publisher=Allen & Unwin, St Leonards|year=1997}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=August 2017}} His famous example of this is using [[ancient Egypt]] and looking at the ways they built themselves out of media with very different properties stone and papyrus. Papyrus is what he called '[[General semantics|Space Binding]]'. it made possible the transmission of written orders across space, empires and enables the waging of distant military campaigns and colonial administration. The other is stone and '[[General semantics|Time Binding]]', through the construction of temples and the pyramids can sustain their authority generation to generation, through this media they can change and shape communication in their society.<ref name="Wark1997" />{{Page needed|date=August 2017}}
[[Social animal]]s, like [[chimpanzees]], [[bonobos]], wolves, and dogs, engage in various forms of communication to express their feelings and build relations.<ref>{{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=3}}</ref> Communication can aid navigation by helping animals move through their environment in a purposeful way, e.g. to locate food, avoid enemies, and follow other animals. In [[bats]], this happens through [[Animal echolocation|echolocation]], i.e. by sending auditory signals and processing the information from the echoes. [[Bees]] are another often-discussed case in this respect since they perform a type of [[Waggle dance|dance]] to indicate to other bees where flowers are located.<ref>{{harvnb|Ruben|2002|pp=27–28}}</ref> In regard to self-defense, communication is used to warn others and to assess whether a costly fight can be avoided.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002|p=28}} | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=5}} }}</ref> Another function of communication is to mark and claim territories used for food and mating. For example, some male birds claim a hedge or part of a meadow by using [[Bird song|songs]] to keep other males away and attract females.<ref>{{harvnb|Ruben|2002|pp=28–29}}</ref>


==As academic discipline with distinct fields of study==
Two competing theories in the study of animal communication are [[Nature versus nurture|nature theory and nurture theory]]. Their conflict concerns to what extent animal communication is programmed into the genes as a form of adaptation rather than learned from previous experience as a form of [[Classical conditioning|conditioning]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2000|pp=58–59}} | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=7}} }}</ref> To the degree that it is learned, it usually happens through [[Imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]], i.e. as a form of learning that only occurs in a certain phase and is then mostly irreversible.<ref>{{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|pp=14–15}}</ref>
{{Main|Communication studies}}


The academic discipline that deals with processes of human communication is communication studies. The discipline encompasses a range of topics, from face-to-face conversation to mass media outlets such as television broadcasting. Communication studies also examines how messages are interpreted through the political, cultural, economic, semiotic, hermeneutic, and social dimensions of their contexts. [[Statistics]], as a quantitative approach to communication science, has also been incorporated into research on communication science in order to help substantiate claims.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hayes|first=Andrew F.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YQ5Yb3z5H1UC|title=Statistical Methods for Communication Science|date=31 May 2005|publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]]|isbn=9781410613707|pages=8–9}}</ref>
===Plants, fungi, and bacteria===
[[Plant communication]] refers to plant processes involving the sending and receiving of information.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|pp=4–5}}</ref> The field studying plant communication is called [[phytosemiotics]].<ref>{{harvnb|Sebeok|1991|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Moc8XzWbT-QC&pg=PA111 111]}}</ref> This field poses additional difficulties for researchers since plants are different from humans and other animals in that they lack a [[central nervous system]] and have [[Cell wall#Plant cell walls|rigid cell walls]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Karban|2015|pp=1–4}} | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|pp=2, 7}} | {{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=128}} }}</ref> These walls restrict movement and usually prevent plants from sending and receiving signals that depend on rapid movement.<ref>{{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=6}}</ref> However, there are some similarities since plants face many of the same challenges as animals. For example, they need to find resources, avoid predators and [[pathogen]]s, find mates, and ensure that their offspring survive.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|pp=1–2}}</ref> Many of the evolutionary responses to these challenges are analogous to those in animals but are implemented using different means.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=2}}</ref> One crucial difference is that [[chemical communication]] is much more prominent in the plant kingdom in contrast to the importance of visual and auditory communication for animals.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=7}} | {{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=128}} }}</ref>


===[[Organizational communication]]===
[[File:Stages of plant communication.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|alt=Diagram of the steps of plant communication: a cue is first emitted and later received, leading to a response|Steps of plant communication]]
{{Main|Business communication}}
In plants, the term ''behavior'' is usually not defined in terms of physical movement, as is the case for animals, but as a biochemical response to a [[Stimulus (physiology)|stimulus]]. This response has to be short relative to the plant's lifespan. Communication is a special form of behavior that involves conveying information from a sender to a receiver. It is distinguished from other types of behavior, like defensive reactions and mere sensing.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|pp=2–4}}</ref> Like in the field of animal communication, plant communication researchers often require as additional criteria that there is some form of response in the receiver and that the communicative behavior is beneficial to sender and receiver.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=5}} | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=1}} | {{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=128}} }}</ref> Biologist Richard Karban distinguishes three steps of plant communication: the emission of a cue by a sender, the perception of the cue by a receiver, and the receiver's response.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=7}}</ref> For plant communication, it is not relevant to what extent the emission of a cue is intentional. However, it should be possible for the receiver to ignore the signal. This criterion can be used to distinguish a response to a signal from a defense mechanism against an unwanted change like intense heat.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=45}}</ref>
Business communication is used for a wide variety of activities including, but not limited to: strategic communications planning, media relations, internal communications, [[public relations]] (which can include social media, broadcast and written communications, and more), brand management, [[reputation management]], speech-writing, customer-client relations, and internal/employee communications.


Companies with limited resources may choose to engage in only a few of these activities, while larger organizations may employ a full spectrum of communications. Since it is relatively difficult to develop such a broad range of skills, communications professionals often specialize in one or two of these areas but usually have at least a working knowledge of most of them. By far, the most important qualifications communications professionals must possess are excellent writing ability, good 'people' skills, and the capacity to think critically and strategically.
Plant communication happens in various forms. It includes communication within plants, i.e. within [[plant cells]] and between plant cells, between plants of the same or related species, and between plants and non-plant organisms, especially in the [[rhizosphere|root zone]].<ref>{{harvnb|Baluska|Volkmann|Hlavacka|Mancuso|2006|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=IH9N4SKWTokC&pg=PA19 2. Neurobiological View of Plants and Their Body Plan]}}</ref> A prominent form of communication is airborne and happens through [[volatile organic compound]]s (VOCs). For example, [[maple]] trees release VOCs when they are attacked by a [[herbivore]] to warn neighboring plants, which then react accordingly by adjusting their defenses.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Arimura|Pearse|2017|pp=4–5}} | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=1}} | {{harvnb|Baldwin|Schultz|1983|pp=277–279}} }}</ref> Another form of plant-to-plant communication happens through [[mycorrhizal fungi]]. These fungi form underground networks, colloquially referred to as the [[Wood-Wide Web]], and connect the roots of different plants. The plants use the network to send messages to each other, specifically to warn other plants of a pest attack and to help prepare their defenses.<ref>{{harvnb|Gilbert|Johnson|2017|pp=84, 94}}</ref>


Business communication could also refer to the style of communication within a given corporate entity (i.e. email conversation styles, or internal communication styles).
Communication can also be observed for fungi and bacteria. Some fungal species communicate by releasing [[pheromone]]s into the external environment. For instance, they are used to promote sexual interaction in several aquatic fungal species.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|O'Day|2012|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=kNB4u65WK6MC 8–9]|loc=1. Modes of cellular communication and sexual interactions in eukaryotic microbes}} | {{harvnb|Davey|1992|pp=951–960}} | {{harvnb|Akada|Minomi|Kai|Yamashita|1989|pp=3491–3498}} }}</ref> One form of communication between bacteria is called [[quorum sensing]]. It happens by releasing [[hormone]]-like molecules, which other bacteria detect and respond to. This process is used to monitor the environment for other bacteria and to coordinate population-wide responses, for example, by sensing the density of bacteria and regulating [[gene expression]] accordingly. Other possible responses include the induction of [[bioluminescence]] and the formation of [[biofilm]]s.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Waters|Bassler|2005|pp=319–320}} | {{harvnb|Demuth|Lamont|2006|p=xiii}} | {{harvnb|Berea|2017|p=59}} }}</ref>


'''The Classical Approach:'''
=== Interspecies ===
{{main|Interspecies communication}}
Most communication happens between members within a species as intraspecies communication. This is because the purpose of communication is usually some form of cooperation. Cooperation happens mostly within a species while different species are often in conflict with each other by competing over resources.<ref>{{harvnb|Berea|2017|p=56}}</ref> However, there are also some forms of interspecies communication.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=167–168}} | {{harvnb|Berea|2017|p=56}} }}</ref> This occurs especially for [[symbiotic]] relations and significantly less for [[parasitic]] or predator-prey relations.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=129}} | {{harvnb|Berea|2017|p=61}} }}</ref>


The classical approach comes from the management theory by Frederick Taylor who was the founder of the scientific management theory as well.<ref name=":02">EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF CLASSICAL AND HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACHES IN MANAGEMENT TODAY</ref> The main idea of the classical approach of organizational communication is that the theory compares organizations to a machine. The theory observed and analyze that workers perform the task they are given to in order to contribute to the overall well-being of the organization. Each member has their purpose in the group, just like a part of a machine works does its tasks while cooperate with other parts to have a well-managed, functioning machine. Additionally, just like a machine that collapse when one part fails to function. An organization will fall apart when members are not doing their designated task appropriately.<ref>{{Cite journal |date=Dec 3, 2020 |title=Classical Theories of Organizational Communication |url=https://socialsci.libretexts.org/@go/page/14869 |journal=}}</ref>
[[File:A honey bee on the Cosmos bipinnatus flower 2.jpg|thumb|alt=Photo of a honey bee on a flower|A honeybee on a ''[[Cosmos bipinnatus]]''. Many flowers use vivid colors to signal to insects that they offer food like nectar.]]
Interspecies communication plays a key role for plants that depend on external agents for reproduction.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=109}}</ref> For example, flowers need insects for [[pollination]] and provide resources like [[nectar]] and other rewards in return.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=110}}</ref> They use communication to signal their benefits and attract visitors by using distinctive colors and symmetrical shapes to stand out from their surroundings.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Karban|2015|pp=110–112, 128}} | {{harvnb|Ketcham|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=IXznDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA100 100]}} }}</ref> This form of advertisement is necessary since flowers compete with each other for visitors.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=111}}</ref> Many fruit-bearing plants rely on plant-to-animal communication to disperse their seeds and move them to a favorable location.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|p=122}}</ref> This happens by providing nutritious fruits to animals. The seeds are eaten together with the fruit and are later excreted at a different location.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|pp=122–124}}</ref> Communication makes animals aware of where the fruits are and whether they are ripe. For many fruits, this happens through their color: they have an inconspicuous green color until they ripen and take on a new color that stands in visual contrast to the environment.<ref>{{harvnb|Karban|2015|pp=125–126, 128}}</ref> Another example of interspecies communication is found in the ant-plant relation.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=129}} | {{harvnb|Berea|2017|p=56}} }}</ref> It concerns, for instance, the selection of seeds by [[ant]]s for their [[ant garden]]s and the pruning of exogenous vegetation as well as plant protection by ants.<ref>{{harvnb|Blatrix|Mayer|2010|p=127}}</ref>


'''The Human Relation Approach:'''
Some animal species also engage in interspecies communication, like apes, whales, dolphins, elephants, and dogs.<ref>{{harvnb|Berea|2017|pp=56–57}}</ref> For example, different species of monkeys use common signals to cooperate when threatened by a common predator.<ref>{{harvnb|Berea|2017|p=61}}</ref> Humans engage in interspecies communication when interacting with [[pet]]s and [[working animals]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=157}} | {{harvnb|Berea|2017|p=59}} | {{harvnb|Novak|Day|2018|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=bsBYDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA202 202–203]}} }}</ref> For instance, acoustic signals play a central role in [[dog communication|communication with dogs]]. Dogs can learn to react to various commands, like "sit" and "come". They can even be trained to respond to short syntactic combinations, like "bring X" or "put X in a box". They also react to the pitch and frequency of the human voice to detect emotions, dominance, and uncertainty. Dogs use a range of behavioral patterns to convey their emotions to humans, for example, in regard to aggressiveness, fearfulness, and playfulness.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|pp=157–158}} | {{harvnb|Coren|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Yzb3K3PykREC&pg=PT42 42]}} }}</ref>


The human relation approach is based from several different theorists such as: Elton Mayo, McGregors's Douglas, Abraham Maslow, Mary Parker Follett's and Argyris.<ref name=":02" /> The main idea of the human relation approach of organizational communication is that the theory compares organizations to a family. As this theory compares organization to a family, it focuses on workers satisfaction and the relationship within the organizations more compared to the work performance element.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Cooley |first=Scott |title=Human Relations Theory of Organization |publisher=GLOBAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC POLICY, AND GOVERNANCE |year=2017 |isbn=9783319318165}}</ref> The human relation approach emphasizes the importance of employee attitudes, and encourage organizations management team to focus on interpersonal relationships, group dynamics, and leadership styles in achieving organizational effectiveness.<ref>{{cite web |title=American Psychological Association |url=https://dictionary.apa.org/human-relations-theory |access-date=March 4, 2022 |website=APA Dictionary of Psychology}}</ref>
== Computer ==
{{main|Computer networks}}
[[File:Example of computer communication.svg|thumb|upright=1.8|alt=Diagram of computer communication from a personal computer to a server using modems and the public telephone network|Example of computer communication: modems act as transmitter and receiver while the public telephone network is used as a transmission system.<ref>{{harvnb|Stallings|2014|p=40}}</ref>]]
Computer communication concerns the exchange of data between computers and similar devices.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Stallings|2014|p=39}} | {{harvnb|Wittmann|Zitterbart|2000|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=bRyEfBCxIRsC&pg=PA1 1]}} }}</ref> For this to be possible, the devices have to be connected through a [[transmission system]] that forms a network between them. A [[transmitter]] is needed to send messages and a receiver is needed to receive them. A personal computer may use a [[modem]] as a transmitter to send information to a server through the public telephone network as the transmission system. The server may use a modem as its receiver.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Stallings|2014|pp=39–40}} | {{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|pp=49, 175}} }}</ref> To transmit the data, it has to be converted into an electric signal.<ref>{{harvnb|Stallings|2014|p=44}}</ref> Communication channels used for transmission are either [[Analog signal|analog]] or [[Digital signal|digital]] and are characterized by features like [[Bandwidth (computing)|bandwidth]] and [[Network latency|latency]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|pp=49–50}} | {{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|pp=142, 175}} | {{harvnb|McGuire|Jenkins|2008|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=swvSgicJM5IC&pg=PA373 373]}} }}</ref>


===Political communication===
There are many forms of [[computer network]]s. The most commonly discussed ones are [[Local area network|LANs]] and [[Wide area network|WANs]]. ''LAN'' stands for ''local area network'', which is a computer network within a limited area, usually with a distance of less than one kilometer.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|pp=4–5, 14}} | {{harvnb|Stallings|2014|pp=46–48}} }}</ref> This is the case when connecting two computers within a home or an office building. LANs can be set up using a wired connection, like Ethernet, or a wireless connection, like [[Wi-Fi]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Nawrocki|2016|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vW2PCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA340 340]}} | {{harvnb|Grigorik|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=KfW-AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA93 93]}} }}</ref> ''WANs'', on the other hand, are ''wide area networks'' that span large geographical regions, like the [[internet]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|pp=4–5, 14}} | {{harvnb|Shinder|2001|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZMizSUW7XF4C&pg=PA37 37]}} | {{harvnb|Stallings|2014|pp=46–48}} }}</ref> Their networks are more complex and may use several intermediate connection nodes to transfer information between endpoints.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Stallings|2014|p=295}} | {{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|p=542}} }}</ref> Further types of computer networks include [[Personal area network|PANs]] (personal area networks), [[Campus area network|CANs]] (campus area networks), and [[Metropolitan area network|MANs]] (metropolitan area networks).<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Palmer|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-QELAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA33 33]}} | {{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|pp=4–5}} }}</ref>
Communication is one of the most relevant tools in political strategies, including persuasion and [[propaganda]]. In [[mass media]] research and online media research, the effort of the strategist is that of getting a precise decoding, avoiding "message reactance", that is, message refusal. The reaction to a message is referred also in terms of approach to a message, as follows:
* In "radical reading" the audience rejects the meanings, values, and viewpoints built into the text by its makers. Effect: message refusal.
* In "dominant reading", the audience accepts the meanings, values, and viewpoints built into the text by its makers. Effect: message acceptance.
* In "subordinate reading" the audience accepts, by and large, the meanings, values, and worldview built into the text by its makers. Effect: obey to the message.<ref>Danesi, Marcel (2009), Dictionary of Media and Communications. M.E.Sharpe, Armonk, New York.</ref>
Holistic approaches are used by communication campaign leaders and communication strategists in order to examine all the options, "actors" and channels that can generate change in the [[semiotic]] landscape, that is, change in [[perceptions]], change in [[credibility]], change in the "[[memetic]] background", change in the image of movements, of candidates, players and managers as perceived by key influencers that can have a role in generating the desired "end-state".


The modern political communication field is highly influenced by the framework and practices of "information operations" doctrines that derive their nature from strategic and military studies. According to this view, what is really relevant is the concept of acting on the Information Environment. The information environment is the aggregate of individuals, organizations, and systems that collect, process, disseminate, or act on information. This environment consists of three interrelated dimensions, which continuously interact with individuals, organizations, and systems. These dimensions are known as physical, informational, and cognitive.<ref>{{cite web|title=Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. Army (2012). Information Operations. Joint Publication 3-13. Joint Doctrine Support Division, 116 Lake View Parkway, Suffolk, VA.|url=http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp3_13.pdf|website=Dtic.mil|access-date=2017-05-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170504054720/http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp3_13.pdf|archive-date=2017-05-04|url-status=dead}}</ref>
For computer communication to be successful, the involved devices have to follow a common set of conventions governing their exchange. These conventions are known as the [[communication protocol]]. They concern various aspects of the exchange, like the format of messages and how to respond to transmission errors. They also cover how the two systems are synchronized, for example, how the receiver identifies the start and end of a signal.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Stallings|2014|pp=29, 41–42}} | {{harvnb|Meinel|Sack|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=5O25BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA129 129]}} }}</ref> Based on the flow of informations, systems are categorized as [[Simplex communication|simplex]], half-[[Duplex (telecommunications)|duplex]], and full-duplex. For simplex systems, signals flow only in one direction from the sender to the receiver, like in radio, cable television, and screens displaying arrivals and departures at airports.<ref>{{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|p=142}}</ref> Half-duplex systems allow two-way exchanges but signals can only flow in one direction at a time, like [[walkie-talkie]]s and [[police radio]]s. In the case of full-duplex systems, signals can flow in both directions at the same time, like regular telephone and internet.<ref>{{harvnb|Hura|Singhal|2001|p=143}}</ref> In either case, it is often important for successful communication that the connection is [[Cyber security|secure]] to ensure that the transmitted data reaches only the intended destination and is not intercepted by an unauthorized third party.<ref>{{harvnb|Stallings|2014|pp=41–42}}</ref> This can be achieved by using [[cryptography]], which changes the format of the transmitted information to make it unintelligible to potential interceptors.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Saha|Manna|Mandal|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=iUI8BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA231 231]}} | {{harvnb|Bruen|Forcinito|McQuillan|2021|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=BPcyEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA49 49]}} }}</ref>


===Interpersonal communication===
Human-computer communication is a closely related field that concerns topics like how [[Human-computer interaction|humans interact with computers]] and how data in the form of inputs and outputs is exchanged.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Guzman|2018|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ML1OtAEACAAJ 1, 5]}} | {{harvnb|Riekert|1990|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=kOU5wrsqvcgC&pg=PA42 42]|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=kOU5wrsqvcgC&pg=PA42 What Does Knowledge Look Like?]}} }}</ref> This happens through a [[user interface]], which includes the hardware used to interact with the computer, like a [[Computer mouse|mouse]], a [[Computer keyboard|keyboard]], and a [[Computer monitor|monitor]], as well as the software used in the process.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Twidale|2002|p=414}} | {{harvnb|Riekert|1990|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=kOU5wrsqvcgC&pg=PA42 42]|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=kOU5wrsqvcgC&pg=PA42 What Does Knowledge Look Like?]}} }}</ref> On the software side, most early user interfaces were [[command-line interface]]s in which the user must type a command to interact with the computer.<ref>{{harvnb|Rao|Wang|Zhou|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ec3sfGyC_q8C&pg=PA57 57]}}</ref> Most modern user interfaces are [[graphical user interfaces]], like [[Microsoft Windows]] and [[macOS]], which are usually much easier to use for non-experts. They involve graphical elements through which the user can interact with the computer, commonly using a design concept known as [[skeumorphism]] to make a new concept feel familiar and speed up understanding by mimicking the real-world equivalent of the interface object. Examples include the typical computer folder icon and recycle bin used for discarding files.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Twidale|2002|p=411}} | {{harvnb|Green|Jiang|Isaacs|2023|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=HGjKEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA16 16]}}}}</ref> One aim when designing user interfaces is to simplify the interaction with computers. This helps make them more user-friendly and accessible to a wider audience while also increasing productivity.<ref>{{harvnb|Twidale|2002|pp=411–413}}</ref>
{{main|Interpersonal communication}}


In simple terms, [[interpersonal communication]] is the communication between one person and another (or others). It is often referred to as face-to-face communication between two (or more) people. Both verbal and nonverbal communication, or [[body language]], play a part in how one person understands another, and attribute to one's own [[soft skills]]. In verbal interpersonal communication there are two types of messages being sent: a content message and a relational message. Content messages are messages about the topic at hand and relational messages are messages about the relationship itself.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Interpersonal Communication Seventh Edition|last1=Trenholm|first1=Sarah|last2=Jensen|first2=Arthur|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2013|location=New York|pages=360–361}}</ref> This means that relational messages come across in ''how'' one says something and it demonstrates a person's feelings, whether positive or negative, towards the individual they are talking to, indicating not only how they feel about the topic at hand, but also how they feel about their relationship with the other individual.<ref name=":0" />
==Communication studies==
 
{{Main|Communication studies}}
There are many different aspects of [[interpersonal communication]] including:
Communication studies, also referred to as ''communication science'', is the academic discipline studying communication. It is closely related to semiotics, with one difference being that communication studies focuses more on technical questions of how messages are sent, received, and processed. Semiotics, on the other hand, tackles more abstract questions in relation to [[Meaning (philosophy)|meaning]] and how signs acquire it.<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2000|pp=58–59}}</ref> Communication studies covers a wide area overlapping with many other disciplines, such as [[biology]], anthropology, [[psychology]], [[sociology]], [[linguistics]], [[media studies]], and [[journalism]].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=181}}  |2={{harvnb|Håkansson|Westander|2013|p=6}} |3={{harvnb|Ruben|2002a|p=156}}  |4={{harvnb|Gill|Adams|1998|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=qhXZU39BVJYC&pg=PR7 vii]}} }}</ref>
* Audiovisual Perception of Communication Problems.<ref>Barkhuysen, P., Krahmer, E., Swerts, M., (2004) Audiovisual Perception of Communication Problems, ISCA Archive http://www.isca-speech.org/archive</ref> The concept follows the idea that our words change what form they take based on the stress level or urgency of the situation. It also explores the concept that stuttering during speech shows the audience that there is a problem or that the situation is more stressful.
* The Attachment Theory.<ref>Bretherton, I., (1992) The Origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, Developmental Psychology, 28, 759-775</ref> This is the combined work of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth (Ainsworth & Bowlby, 1991) This theory follows the relationships that builds between a mother and child, and the impact it has on their relationships with others.
* Emotional Intelligence and Triggers.<ref>Mazza, J., Emotional Triggers, MABC, CPC</ref> Emotional Intelligence focuses on the ability to monitor ones own emotions as well as those of others. Emotional Triggers focus on events or people that tend to set off intense, emotional reactions within individuals.
* Attribution Theory.<ref>Bertram, M., (2004) How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction, MIT Press, {{ISBN|978-0-262-13445-3}}</ref> This is the study of how individuals explain what causes different events and behaviors.
* The Power of Words (Verbal communications).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/a-primer-on-communication-studies/s05-listening.html |title=Listening |website=2012books.lardbucket.org |access-date=2017-05-01}}</ref> Verbal communication focuses heavily on the power of words, and how those words are said. It takes into consideration tone, volume, and choice of words.
* Nonverbal Communication. It focuses heavily on the setting that the words are conveyed in, as well as the physical tone of the words.
* Ethics in Personal Relations.<ref>Lipthrott, D., What IS Relationship? What is Ethical Partnership?</ref> It is about a space of mutual responsibility between two individuals, it's about giving and receiving in a relationship. This theory is explored by Dawn J. Lipthrott in the article What IS Relationship? What is Ethical Partnership?
* Deception in Communication.<ref>Hearn, J., (2006) Interpersonal Deception Theory: Ten Lessons for Negotiators</ref> This concept goes into that everyone lies, and how this can impact relationships. This theory is explored by James Hearn in his article Interpersonal Deception Theory: Ten Lessons for Negotiators.
* Conflict in Couples.<ref>Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., (2014) Couples, the Internet, and Social Media</ref> This focuses on the impact that social media has on relationships, as well as how to communicate through conflict. This theory is explored by Amanda Lenhart and Maeve Duggan in their paper Couples, the Internet, and Social Media.
 
==== Family communication ====
Family communication is the study of the communication perspective in a broadly defined family, with intimacy and trusting relationship.<ref>Turner, L.H., & West, R.L. (2013). ''Perspectives on family communication''. Boston: McGraw-Hill.</ref> The main goal of family communication is to understand the interactions of family and the pattern of behaviors of family members in different circumstances. Open and honest communication creates an atmosphere that allows family members to express their differences as well as love and admiration for one another. It also helps to understand the feelings of one another.
 
Family communication study looks at topics such as family rules, family roles or family dialectics and how those factors could affect the communication between family members. Researchers develop theories to understand communication behaviors. Family communication study also digs deep into certain time periods of family life such as marriage, parenthood or divorce and how communication stands in those situations. It is important for family members to understand communication as a trusted way which leads to a well constructed family.
 
'''Rhetoric'''
 
According to scholar Anne Beaufort, communication is also interested in rhetoric as a method of investigating "oral and written communications, particularly with regard to the desired effect on an audience, and lately, with visual communications as well."<ref>Beaufort, Anne. "Rhetorical Studies, Communications, and Composition Studies: Disparate or Overlapping Discourse Communities." ''The Realms of Rhetoric''.</ref>
 
==Barriers to effectiveness==
{{howto|date=July 2021}}
Barriers to effective communication can distort the message or intention of the message being conveyed. This may result in failure of the communication process or cause an effect that is undesirable. These include filtering, [[selective perception]], [[information overload]], emotions, language, silence, [[communication apprehension]], gender differences and [[political correctness]].<ref>Robbins, S., Judge, T., Millett, B., & Boyle, M. (2011). Organisational Behaviour. 6th ed. Pearson, French's Forest, NSW pp. 315–317.</ref>
 
This also includes a lack of expressing "knowledge-appropriate" communication, which occurs when a person uses ambiguous or complex legal words, medical jargon, or descriptions of a situation or environment that is not understood by the recipient.
* '''Physical barriers''' – Physical barriers are often due to the nature of the environment. An example of this is the natural barrier which exists when workers are located in different buildings or on different sites. Likewise, poor or outdated equipment, particularly the failure of management to introduce new technology, may also cause problems. Staff shortages are another factor which frequently causes communication difficulties for an organization.
* '''System design''' – [[System design]] faults refer to problems with the structures or systems in place in an organization. Examples might include an organizational structure which is unclear and therefore makes it confusing to know whom to communicate with. Other examples could be inefficient or inappropriate information systems, a lack of supervision or training, and a lack of clarity in roles and responsibilities which can lead to staff being uncertain about what is expected of them.
* '''Attitudinal barriers'''– Attitudinal barriers come about as a result of problems with staff in an organization. These may be brought about, for example, by such factors as poor management, lack of consultation with employees, personality conflicts which can result in people delaying or refusing to communicate, the personal attitudes of individual employees which may be due to lack of motivation or dissatisfaction at work, brought about by insufficient training to enable them to carry out particular tasks, or simply resistance to change due to entrenched attitudes and ideas.<ref name=":1" />
* '''Ambiguity of words/phrases''' – Words sounding the same but having different meaning can convey a different meaning altogether. Hence the communicator must ensure that the receiver receives the same meaning. It is better if such words are avoided by using alternatives whenever possible.
* '''Individual linguistic ability''' – The use of [[jargon]], difficult or inappropriate words in communication can prevent the recipients from understanding the message. Poorly explained or misunderstood messages can also result in confusion. However, research in communication has shown that confusion can lend [[legitimation|legitimacy]] to research when persuasion fails.<ref>[http://www.pmhut.com/what-should-be-included-in-a-project-plan What Should Be Included in a Project Plan]. Retrieved December 18, 2009</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=http://qbox.wharton.upenn.edu/documents/mktg/research/Bafflegab%20Pays.pdf |title=Bafflegab Pays |author=J. Scott Armstrong |journal=Psychology Today |page=12 |year=1980 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130828171508/http://qbox.wharton.upenn.edu/documents/mktg/research/Bafflegab%20Pays.pdf |archive-date=2013-08-28 }}</ref>
* '''Physiological barriers''' – These may result from individuals' personal discomfort, caused—for example—by ill health, poor eyesight or hearing difficulties.
* '''Bypassing''' – This happens when the communicators (the sender and the receiver) do not attach the same symbolic meanings to their words. It is when the sender is expressing a thought or a word but the receiver gives it a different meaning. For example- ASAP, Rest room.
* '''Technological multi-tasking and absorbency''' – With a rapid increase in technologically driven communication in the past several decades, an increasingly faced with condensed communication in the form of e-mail, text, and social updates. This has, in turn, led to a notable change in the way younger generations communicate and perceive their own [[self-efficacy]] to communicate and connect with others. With the ever-constant presence of another "world" in one's pocket, individuals are multi-tasking both physically and cognitively as constant reminders of something else happening somewhere else bombard them. Though perhaps too new an advancement to yet see long-term effects, this is a notion currently explored by such figures as Sherry Turkle.<ref>{{cite web|title = Technology can sometimes hinder communication, TR staffers observe - The Collegian|url = http://collegian.tccd.edu/?p=3851|website = The Collegian|access-date = 2016-01-11|language = en-US|date = 2012-10-09}}</ref>
* '''Fear of being criticized''' – This is a major factor that prevents good communication. If we exercise simple practices to improve our communication skill, we can become effective communicators. For example, read an article from the newspaper or collect some news from the television and present it in front of the mirror. This will not only boost your confidence but also improve your language and vocabulary.
* '''Gender barriers''' – There can be a potential for a set agenda with communicators. This can be notable among the different genders. For example, women could be found to be more critical when addressing conflict or it could be noted that men are more likely than women to withdraw from conflict.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bailey|first=Sandra|year=2009|title=Couple Relationships: Communication and Conflict Resolution|url=http://store.msuextension.org/publications/HomeHealthandFamily/MT200917HR.pdf|journal=MSU Extension|volume=17|page=2|via=George Mason University Libraries|access-date=2016-12-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171215110917/http://store.msuextension.org/publications/HomeHealthandFamily/MT200917HR.pdf|archive-date=2017-12-15|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
===Noise===
In any communication model, noise is interference with the decoding of messages sent over the channel by an encoder. There are many examples of noise:
* '''Environmental noise.''' Noise that physically disrupts communication, such as standing next to loud speakers at a party, or the noise from a construction site next to a classroom making it difficult to hear the professor.
* '''Physiological-impairment noise.''' Physical maladies that prevent effective communication, such as actual [[deafness]] or [[blindness]] preventing messages from being received as they were intended.
* '''Semantic noise.''' Different interpretations of the meanings of certain words. For example, the word "weed" can be interpreted as an [[Weed|undesirable plant in a yard]], or as a euphemism for [[Cannabis (drug)|marijuana]].
* '''Syntactical noise.''' Mistakes in grammar can disrupt communication, such as abrupt changes in [[Grammatical tense|verb tense]] during a sentence.
* '''Organizational noise.''' Poorly structured communication can prevent the receiver from accurate interpretation. For example, unclear and badly stated directions can make the receiver even more lost.
* '''Cultural noise.''' Stereotypical assumptions can cause misunderstandings, such as unintentionally offending a non-Christian person by wishing them a "Merry Christmas".
* '''Psychological noise.''' Certain attitudes can also make communication difficult. For instance, great anger or sadness may cause someone to lose focus on the present moment. Disorders such as [[autism]] may also severely hamper effective communication.<ref>Roy M. Berko, et al., Communicating. 11th ed. (Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2010) 9–12</ref>
To face communication noise, redundancy and acknowledgement must often be used. Acknowledgements are messages from the addressee informing the originator that his/her communication has been received and is understood.<ref>North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO Standardization Agency AAP-6 – Glossary of terms and definitions, p. 43.</ref> Message repetition and feedback about message received are necessary in the presence of noise to reduce the probability of misunderstanding.
The act of disambiguation regards the attempt of reducing noise and wrong interpretations, when the semantic value or meaning of a sign can be subject to noise, or in presence of multiple meanings, which makes the sense-making difficult. Disambiguation attempts to decrease the likelihood of misunderstanding. This is also a fundamental skill in communication processes activated by counselors, psychotherapists, interpreters, and in coaching sessions based on colloquium. In Information Technology, the disambiguation process and the automatic disambiguation of meanings of words and sentences has also been an interest and concern since the earliest days of computer treatment of language.<ref>Nancy Ide, Jean Véronis. "Word Sense Disambiguation: The State of the Art", Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 1998, pp. 1–40.</ref>


===Cultural aspects===
Many contributions in the field of communication studies focus on developing [[models of communication|models]] and [[Communication theory|theories of communication]]. Models of communication aim to give a simplified overview of the main components involved in communication. Theories of communication try to provide conceptual frameworks to accurately present communication in all its complexity.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=181}} | {{harvnb|Cobley|Schulz|2013|pp=[https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110240450/html 7–10]|loc=Introduction}} | {{harvnb|Berger|Roloff|Ewoldsen|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=gH7F_0kTQTEC&pg=PT22 10]}} }}</ref> Some theories focus on communication as a practical art of discourse while others explore the roles of signs, experience, information processing, and the goal of building a social order through coordinated interaction.<ref>{{harvnb|Cobley|Schulz|2013|pp=31, 41–42}}</ref> Communication studies is also interested in the functions and effects of communication. It covers issues like how communication satisfies physiological and psychological needs, helps build relationships, and assists in gathering information about the environment, other individuals, and oneself.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Steinberg|2007|p=18}} | {{harvnb|Gamble|Gamble|2019|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=bUdeDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA14 14–16]}} }}</ref> A further topic concerns the question of how communication systems change over time and how these changes correlate with other societal changes.<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=184}}</ref> A related topic focuses on psychological principles underlying those changes and the effects they have on how people exchange ideas.<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=184–185}}</ref>
Cultural differences exist within countries (tribal/regional differences, dialects and so on), between religious groups and in organisations or at an organisational level – where companies, teams and units may have different expectations, norms and idiolects. Families and family groups may also experience the effect of cultural barriers to communication within and between different family members or groups. For example: words, colours and symbols have different meanings in different cultures. In most parts of the world, nodding your head means agreement, shaking your head means "no", but this is not true everywhere.<ref>Nageshwar Rao, Rajendra P. Das, ''Communication skills,'' Himalaya Publishing House, 9789350516669, p. 48</ref>


Communication to a great extent is influenced by culture and [[Cultural variations in adoption|cultural variables]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://expertscolumn.com/content/communication-and-cognitive-components-culture |title=Archived copy |access-date=2012-09-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130718080147/http://expertscolumn.com/content/communication-and-cognitive-components-culture |archive-date=2013-07-18 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.beyondintractability.org/bi-essay/cross-cultural-communication |title=Incorrect Link to Beyond Intractability Essay |publisher=Beyond Intractability |date=2017-04-18 |access-date=2017-05-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.studymode.com/essays/Important-Components-Of-Cross-Cultural-Communication-595745.html |title=Important Components of Cross-Cultural Communication Essay |website=Studymode.com |access-date=2017-05-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/313/155 |title=Portable Document Format (PDF) |website=Ijdesign.org |access-date=2017-05-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170514134110/http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/313/155 |archive-date=2017-05-14 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Understanding ''cultural aspects of communication'' refers to having knowledge of different cultures in order to communicate effectively with cross culture people. Cultural aspects of communication are of great relevance in today's world which is now a [[Global village (term)|global village]], thanks to [[globalisation]]. Cultural aspects of communication are the cultural differences which influence communication across borders.
Communication was studied as early as [[Ancient Greek|Ancient Greece]]. Early influential theories were created by [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]], who stressed public speaking and the understanding of [[rhetoric]]. According to Aristotle, for example, the goal of communication is to [[Persuasion|persuade]] the audience.<ref>{{harvnb|Ruben|2002a|p=155}}</ref> The field of communication studies only became a separate research discipline in the 20th century, especially starting in the 1940s.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002a|pp=155–156}} | {{harvnb|Berger|Roloff|Ewoldsen|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=gH7F_0kTQTEC&pg=PT15 3–4]}} }}</ref> The development of new communication technologies, such as telephone, radio, newspapers, television, and the internet, has had a big impact on communication and communication studies.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002a|pp=155–156}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|2007|p=3}} | {{harvnb|Bernabo|2017|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=4GFCDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA201 201–202]|loc=Communication History}} }}</ref>


# [[Verbal communication]] refers to a form of communication which uses spoken and written words for expressing and transferring views and ideas. Language is the most important tool of verbal communication. Countries have different [[language]]s. A knowledge of languages of different countries can improve cross-cultural understanding.
Today, communication studies is a wide discipline. Some works in it try to provide a general characterization of communication in the widest sense. Others attempt to give a precise analysis of one specific form of communication. Communication studies includes many subfields. Some focus on wide topics like interpersonal communication, intrapersonal communication, verbal communication, and non-verbal communication. Others investigate communication within a specific area.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Ruben|2002a|pp=155–156}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|2007|p=286}} | {{harvnb|Jenkins|Chen|2016|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=HQJbDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT506 506]}} }}</ref> [[Organizational communication]] concerns communication between members of organizations such as [[corporations]], [[nonprofits]], or small businesses. Central in this regard is the coordination of the behavior of the different members as well as the interaction with customers and the general public.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Putnam|Woo|Banghart|2017}} | {{harvnb|Ren|Zhai|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nC6_BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 77]}} }}</ref> Closely related terms are [[business communication]], [[corporate communication]], and [[professional communication]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Hartley|Bruckmann|2008|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=n-OGAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 1–2]}} | {{harvnb|Mullany|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rC3rDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 2]}} | {{harvnb|Dixon|2017|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=4XHQDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA204 204]}} }}</ref> The main element of [[marketing communication]] is [[advertising]] but it also encompasses other communication activities aimed at advancing the organization's objective to its audiences, like [[public relations]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Sierra|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=0xL_cHiMfLoC&pg=PA392 392]}} | {{harvnb|Brønn|2016|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Zs6UCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT360 360]}} }}</ref> [[Political communication]] covers topics like [[electoral campaigns]] to influence voters and legislative communication, like letters to a [[congress]] or committee documents. Specific emphasis is often given to [[propaganda]] and the role of [[mass media]].<ref>{{harvnb|McClelland|2008|loc=[https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/communication-political Communication, Political]}}</ref>
# [[Non-verbal communication]] is a very wide concept and it includes all the other forms of communication which do not use written or spoken words. Non verbal communication takes the following forms:
#* [[Paralinguistics]] are the elements other than language where the voice is involved in communication and includes [[Tone (linguistics)|tones]], [[pitch (music)|pitch]], vocal cues etc. It also includes sounds from throat and all these are greatly influenced by cultural differences across borders.
#* [[Proxemics]] deals with the concept of the [[space]] element in communication. Proxemics explains four zones of spaces, namely intimate, personal, social and public. This concept differs from culture to culture as the permissible space varies in different countries.
#* [[Artifactics]] studies the [[nonverbal communication|non verbal signals]] or communication which emerges from personal accessories such as the dress or fashion accessories worn and it varies with culture as people of different countries follow different dress codes.
#* [[Chronemics]] deals with the time aspects of communication and also includes the importance given to time. Some issues explaining this concept are pauses, silences and response lag during an [[interaction]]. This aspect of communication is also influenced by [[cultural difference]]s as it is well known that there is a great difference in the value given by different cultures to time.
#* [[Kinesics]] mainly deals with [[body language]] such as [[Neutral spine|postures]], [[gesture]]s, [[head nod]]s, leg movements, etc. In different countries, the same gestures and postures are used to convey different messages. Sometimes even a particular kinesic indicating something good in a country may have a negative meaning in another culture.


So in order to have an effective communication across the world it is desirable to have a knowledge of cultural variables effecting communication.
[[Intercultural communication]] is relevant to both organizational and political communication since they often involve attempts to exchange messages between communicators from different cultural backgrounds.<ref>{{harvnb|Hillstrom, Northern Lights|Magee, ECDI|2006|pp=[https://www.encyclopedia.com/entrepreneurs/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/intercultural-communication 609–610]|loc=Intercultural communication}}</ref> The cultural background affects how messages are formulated and interpreted and can be the cause of misunderstandings.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Blythe|2009|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rPgQRbBLdYgC&pg=177 177–180]}} | {{harvnb|Meng|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=b0HWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA120 120]}} }}</ref> It is also relevant for [[development communication]], which is about the use of communication for assisting in development, like aid given by [[First world|first-world countries]] to [[third-world countries]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Melkote|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=SNmJy7iBYOYC&pg=PA129 129]}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|2007|p=301}} }}</ref> [[Health communication]] concerns communication in the field of [[healthcare]] and health promotion efforts. One of its topics is how healthcare providers, like doctors and nurses, should communicate with their patients.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Steinberg|2007|p=307}} | {{harvnb|Kreps|2002|p=395}} }}</ref>


According to Michael Walsh and [[Ghil'ad Zuckermann]], Western conversational interaction is typically "dyadic", between two particular people, where eye contact is important and the speaker controls the interaction; and "contained" in a relatively short, defined time frame. However, traditional Aboriginal conversational interaction is "communal", broadcast to many people, eye contact is not important, the listener controls the interaction; and "continuous", spread over a longer, indefinite time frame.<ref name=Engaging>{{citation|url=https://arts.adelaide.edu.au/linguistics/guide.pdf |title=Engaging – A Guide to Interacting Respectfully and Reciprocally with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People, and their Arts Practices and Intellectual Property |author=Zuckermann, Ghil'ad |author-link=Ghil'ad Zuckermann |display-authors=et al |publisher=Australian Government: Indigenous Culture Support |year=2015 |page=12 |access-date=25 June 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160330114112/http://arts.adelaide.edu.au/linguistics/guide.pdf |archive-date=30 March 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation|url=https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/47329|publisher=Australian National University, North Australia Research Unit|author=Walsh, Michael|year=1997|title=Cross cultural communication problems in Aboriginal Australia|pages=7–9|access-date=25 June 2016|isbn=9780731528745}}</ref>
== History ==
{{main|History of communication}}
Communication history studies how communicative processes evolved and interacted with society, culture, and technology.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Simonson|Peck|Craig|Jackson|2013|p=1}} | {{harvnb|Sonderling|1995|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=54oceJfEV0kC&pg=PA89 89]}} }}</ref> Human communication has a long history and the way people communicate has changed considerably over time. Many of these changes were triggered by the development of new communication technologies and had various effects on how people exchanged ideas.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Peters|2012|pp=[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444811429927c 356–359]}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 2–3]}} | {{harvnb|Innis|1950|pp=6–7}} }}</ref> New communication technologies usually require new skills that people need to learn to use them effectively.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Rowitz|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=RekQlJPS85EC&pg=PA459 459]}} | {{harvnb|Calabrese|Sparks|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=UT_FAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA85 85]}} | {{harvnb|Tompkins|2023|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=FmuyEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT141 141]}} }}</ref>


==Nonhuman==
In the academic literature, the history of communication is usually divided into ages based on the dominant form of communication in that age. The number of ages and the precise periodization are disputed. They usually include ages for speaking, writing, and print as well as electronic mass communication and the internet.<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 2–5]}} |2={{harvnb|Simonson|Peck|Craig|Jackson|2013|p=1}} |3={{harvnb|Simonson|Peck|Craig|Jackson|2013a|p=14}} |4={{harvnb|Poe|2011|p=V}} |5={{harvnb|Blondheim|2016|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=eY_2DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA927 927–928]}} }}</ref> According to communication theorist [[Marshall Poe]], the dominant media for each age can be characterized in relation to several factors. They include the amount of information a medium can store, how long it persists, how much time it takes to transmit it, and how costly it is to use the medium. Poe argues that subsequent ages usually involve some form of improvement of one or more of the factors.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Poe|2011|pp=12–13}} | {{harvnb|Peters|2012|pp=[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444811429927c 356–359]}} }}</ref>
{{See also|Biocommunication (science)|Interspecies communication|Biosemiotics}}
Every [[information exchange]] between living organisms — i.e. transmission of [[Signalling theory|signals]] that involve a living sender and [[Receiver (information theory)|receiver]] can be considered a form of communication; and even primitive creatures such as corals are competent to communicate. Nonhuman communication also include [[cell signaling]], [[Cellular communication (biology)|cellular communication]], and chemical transmissions between primitive organisms like [[bacteria]] and within the [[plant]] and [[fungi|fungal]] kingdoms.


===Animals===
According to some scientific estimates, language developed around 40,000 years ago while others consider it to be much older. Before this development, human communication resembled animal communication and happened through a combination of grunts, cries, gestures, and facial expressions. Language helped early humans to organize themselves and plan ahead more efficiently.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA3 3]}} | {{harvnb|Capstick|2020|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jW76DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA5 5–6]}} }}</ref> In early societies, spoken language was the primary form of communication.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=168}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 2–3]}} }}</ref> Most knowledge was passed on through it, often in the form of stories or wise sayings. This form does not produce stable knowledge since it depends on [[Memory#Failures|imperfect human memory]]. Because of this, many details differ from one telling to the next and are presented differently by distinct storytellers.<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=168}}</ref> As people started to settle and form [[Agrarian society|agricultural communities]], societies grew and there was an increased need for stable records of ownership of land and commercial transactions. This triggered the invention of writing, which is able to solve many problems that arose from using exclusively oral communication.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Poe|2011|p=67}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 3–4]}} }}</ref> It is much more efficient at preserving knowledge and passing it on between generations since it does not depend on human memory.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=168–169}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 3–4]}} }}</ref> Before the invention of writing, certain forms of [[proto-writing]] had already developed. Proto-writing encompasses long-lasting visible marks used to store information, like decorations on pottery items, knots in a cord to track goods, or seals to mark property.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Robinson|2009|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=KRsUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 4–5]}} | {{harvnb|Aitchison|2007|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZgmmB6vNjYYC&pg=PA33 33]}} }}</ref>
The broad field of [[animal communication]] encompasses most of the issues in [[ethology]]. [[Animal communication]] can be defined as any [[behavior]] of one animal that affects the current or future behavior of another animal. The study of animal communication, called ''zoo semiotics'' (distinguishable from [[anthroposemiotics]], the study of human communication) has played an important part in the development of [[ethology]], [[sociobiology]], and the study of [[animal cognition]]. Animal communication, and indeed the understanding of the animal world in general, is a rapidly growing field, and even in the 21st century so far, a great share of prior understanding related to diverse fields such as personal symbolic [[name]] use, [[emotion in animals|animal emotions]], [[animal culture]] and [[animal learning|learning]], and even [[animal sexuality|sexual conduct]], long thought to be well understood, has been revolutionized.


===Plants and fungi===
[[File:Sales contract Shuruppak Louvre AO3766.jpg|thumb|alt=Photo of a sales contract inscribed on a clay tablet|Sales contract inscribed on a clay tablet using pre-cuneiform script]]
Communication is observed within the plant organism, i.e. within [[plant cells]] and between plant cells, between plants of the same or related species, and between plants and non-plant organisms, especially in the [[rhizosphere|root zone]]. [[Plant root]]s communicate with [[rhizome]] [[bacteria]], [[fungi]], and insects within the [[soil]]. Recent research has shown that most of the microorganism plant communication processes are [[neuron]]-like.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Baluska |first1=F. |last2=Marcuso |first2=Stefano |last3=Volkmann |first3=Dieter |title=Communication in plants: neuronal aspects of plant life |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IH9N4SKWTokC&pg=PA19 |page=19 |year=2006 |publisher=Taylor & Francis US |isbn=978-3-540-28475-8 |quote=...the emergence of plant neurobiology as the most recent area of plant sciences.}}</ref> Plants also communicate via [[volatile oil|volatiles]] when exposed to [[herbivory]] attack behavior, thus warning neighboring plants.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Rapid Changes in Tree Leaf Chemistry Induced by Damage: Evidence for Communication Between Plants |author=Ian T. Baldwin |author2=Jack C. Schultz |journal=Science |year=1983 |doi=10.1126/science.221.4607.277 |volume=221 |issue=4607 |pages=277–279 |pmid=17815197|bibcode=1983Sci...221..277B |s2cid=31818182 }}</ref> In parallel they produce other volatiles to attract [[parasitism|parasites]] which attack these herbivores.
Most early written communication happened through [[pictogram]]s. Pictograms are graphical symbols that convey meaning by visually resembling real-world objects. The use of basic pictographic symbols to represent things like farming produce was common in ancient cultures and began around 9000 BCE. The first complex writing system including pictograms was developed around 3500 BCE by the [[Sumer]]ians and is called [[cuneiform]].<ref>{{multiref |1={{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=168–169}} |2={{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 3–4]}} |3={{harvnb|Poe|2011|p=68}} |4={{harvnb|Bernabo|2017|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=4GFCDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA199 199]}} }}</ref> Pictograms are still in use today, like no-smoking signs and the symbols of male and female figures on bathroom doors.<ref>{{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=168–169}}</ref> A significant disadvantage of pictographic writing systems is that they need a large amount of symbols to refer to all the objects one wants to talk about. This problem was solved by the development of other writing systems. For example, the symbols of [[alphabetic]] writing systems do not stand for regular objects. Instead, they relate to the sounds used in spoken language.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=168–169}} | {{harvnb|Poe|2011|pp=69–70}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 4]}} }}</ref> Other types of early writing systems include [[logographic]] and [[ideographic]] writing systems.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Yule|2010|pp=212–214}} | {{harvnb|Haarmann|2020|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=FkL_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA157 157–158]}} }}</ref> A drawback of many early forms of writing, like the clay tablets used for cuneiform, was that they were not very portable. This made it difficult to transport the texts from one location to another to share information. This changed with the invention of [[papyrus]] by the Egyptians around 2500 BCE and was further improved later by the development of [[parchment]] and [[paper]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 4]}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=169}} }}</ref>


Fungi communicate to coordinate and organize their growth and development such as the formation of [[Mycelium|mycelia]] and [[fruiting body|fruiting bodies]]. Fungi communicate with their own and related species as well as with non fungal organisms in a great variety of symbiotic interactions, especially with bacteria, [[unicellular]] eukaryote, plants and insects through biochemicals of biotic origin. The biochemicals trigger the fungal organism to react in a specific manner, while if the same chemical molecules are not part of biotic messages, they do not trigger the fungal organism to react. This implies that fungal organisms can differentiate between molecules taking part in biotic messages and similar molecules being irrelevant in the situation. So far five different primary signalling molecules are known to coordinate different behavioral patterns such as [[filamentation]], [[mating]], growth, and [[pathogenicity]]. Behavioral coordination and production of signaling substances is achieved through interpretation processes that enables the organism to differ between self or non-self, a biotic indicator, biotic message from similar, related, or non-related species, and even filter out "noise", i.e. similar molecules without biotic content.
Until the 1400s, almost all written communication was hand-written, which limited the spread of written media within society since copying texts by hand was costly. The introduction and popularization of mass printing in the middle of the 15th century by [[Johann Gutenberg]] resulted in rapid changes. Mass printing quickly increased the circulation of written media and also led to the dissemination of new forms of written documents, like newspapers and pamphlets. One side effect was that the augmented availability of written documents significantly improved the general [[literacy]] of the population. This development served as the foundation for revolutions in various fields, including science, politics, and religion.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=169–170}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 4–5]}} | {{harvnb|Poe|2011|pp=104–105, 112}} }}</ref>


===Bacteria quorum sensing===
Scientific discoveries in the 19th and 20th centuries caused many further developments in the history of communication. They include the invention of [[Telegraphy|telegraphs]] and telephones, which made it even easier and faster to transmit information from one location to another without the need to transport written documents.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 5–7]}} | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=171–172}} }}</ref> These communication forms were initially limited to cable connections, which had to be established first. Later developments found ways of wireless transmission using radio signals. They made it possible to reach wide audiences and radio soon became one of the central forms of mass communication.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|p=171}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 5–7]}} }}</ref> Various innovations in the field of photography enabled the recording of images on film, which led to the development of cinema and television.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=172–173}} | {{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 5–6]}} }}</ref> The reach of wireless communication was further enhanced with the development of [[Communications satellite|satellites]], which made it possible to broadcast radio and television signals to stations all over the world. This way, information could be shared almost instantly everywhere around the globe.<ref>{{harvnb|Steinberg|1995|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC&pg=PA2 7]}}</ref> The development of the internet constitutes a further milestone in the history of communication. It made it easier than ever before for people to exchange ideas, collaborate, and access information from anywhere in the world by using a variety of means, such as websites, e-mail, social media, and video conferences.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Danesi|2013|pp=178–181}} | {{harvnb|Poe|2011|pp=223–224}} }}</ref>
Communication is not a tool used only by humans, plants and animals, but it is also used by microorganisms like bacteria. The process is called [[quorum sensing]]. Through quorum sensing, bacteria can sense the density of cells, and regulate gene expression accordingly. This can be seen in both gram positive and gram negative bacteria.
This was first observed by Fuqua ''et al.'' in marine microorganisms like ''[[Vibrio harveyi|V. harveyi]]'' and ''[[Vibrio fischeri|V. fischeri]]''.<ref>Anand, Sandhya. ''[http://www.biotecharticles.com/Biology-Article/Quorum-Sensing-Communication-Plan-For-Microbes-517.html Quorum Sensing- Communication Plan For Microbes]''. Article dated 2010-12-28, retrieved on 2012-04-03.</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
 
{{For outline}}
{{Portal|Media|Society|Technology}}
{{columns-list|colwidth=20em|
{{columns-list|colwidth=20em|
* [[21st century skills]]
* {{anl|Agricultural communication}}
* [[Advice (opinion)|Advice]]
* {{anl|Augmentative and alternative communication}}
* [[Augmentative and alternative communication]]
* {{anl|Aviation communication}}
* [[Bias-free communication]]
* {{anl|Bias-free communication}}
* [[Communication rights]]
* {{anl|Communication rights}}
* [[Context as Other Minds]]
* {{anl|Data transmission}}
* [[Cross-cultural communication]]
* {{anl|Defensive communication}}
* [[Data transmission]]
* {{anl|Environmental communication}}
* [[Error detection and correction]]
* {{anl|Information engineering}}
* [[Human communication]]
* [[Interdepartmental communication]]
* [[Information engineering (field)|Information engineering]]
* {{anl|International communication}}
* ''[[Inter mirifica]]''
* {{anl|Ishin-denshin|''Ishin-denshin''}}
* [[Intercultural communication]]
* {{anl|Linguistic rights}}
* ''[[Ishin-denshin]]''
* {{anl|Military communication}}
* [[Group dynamics]]
* {{anl|Nonviolent Communication}}
* [[Language]]
* {{anl|Proactive communications}}
* [[Mass communication]]
* {{anl|Risk communication}}
* [[Proactive communications]]
* {{anl|Scientific communication}}
* [[Sign system]]
* {{anl|Small talk}}
* [[Signal]]
* {{anl|Two Generals' Problem}}
* [[Small talk]]
* {{anl|Upward communication}}
* [[SPEAKING]]
* [[Telepathy]]
* [[Understanding]]
*[[Writing]]
}}
}}


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em}}
===Citations===
{{reflist|22em}}


==Further reading==
===Sources===
{{Library resources box
{{refbegin|30em}}
|by=no
* {{cite book |last1=Aitchison |first1=Jean |title=The Word Weavers: Newshounds and Wordsmiths |date=31 May 2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-83245-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZgmmB6vNjYYC&pg=PA33 |language=en |access-date=2 September 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
|onlinebooks=no
* {{cite journal |last1=Akada |first1=Rinji |last2=Minomi |first2=Kenjiro |last3=Kai |first3=Jingo |last4=Yamashita |first4=Ichiro |last5=Miyakawa |first5=Tokichi |last6=Fukui |first6=Sakuzo |date=August 1989 |title=Multiple Genes Coding for Precursors of Rhodotorucine A, a Farnesyl Peptide Mating Pheromone of the Basidiomycetous Yeast Rhodosporidium Toruloides |journal=Molecular and Cellular Biology |language=en |volume=9 |issue=8 |pages=3491–3498 |doi=10.1128/mcb.9.8.3491-3498.1989 |pmc=362396 |pmid=2571924 |doi-access=free |issn=0270-7306 }}
|others=no
* {{cite book |last1=Arimura |first1=G. |last2=Pearse |first2=I. S. |chapter=From the Lab Bench to the Forest: Ecology and Defence Mechanisms of Volatile-Mediated 'Talking Trees' |editor-last1=Becard |editor-first1=Guillaume |title=How Plants Communicate With Their Biotic Environment |date=17 March 2017 |publisher=Academic Press |isbn=978-0-12-801620-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XPEbDQAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
|about=yes
* {{cite book |last1=Backlund |first1=Philip M. |last2=Morreale |first2=Sherwyn P. |chapter=Communication competence: Historical synopsis, definitions, applications, and looking to the future |editor-last1=Hannawa |editor-first1=Annegret F. |editor-last2=Spitzberg |editor-first2=Brian H. |title=Communication Competence |date=16 October 2015 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG |isbn=978-3-11-031745-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6ZunCgAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=29 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
|label=communication}}
* {{cite book |last1=Baker |first1=Anne E. |last2=Hengeveld |first2=Kees |author2-link=Kees Hengeveld |title=Linguistics |date=5 March 2012 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-631-23036-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R8uWDVdRQlYC&pg=PA25 |language=en |access-date=28 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Innis |first1=Harold |author-link=Harold Innis |last2=Innis |first2=Mary Q. |title=Empire and Communications |edition=Revised |others=Foreword by [[Marshall McLuhan]] |location=Toronto |publisher=[[University of Toronto Press]] |year=1975 |orig-year=1950 |isbn=978-0-8020-6119-5 |oclc=19403451|title-link=Empire and Communications }}
* {{cite journal |title=Rapid Changes in Tree Leaf Chemistry Induced by Damage: Evidence for Communication Between Plants |last1=Baldwin |first1=Ian T. |last2=Schultz |first2=Jack C. |journal=Science |year=1983 |doi=10.1126/science.221.4607.277 |volume=221 |issue=4607 |pages=277–279 |pmid=17815197 |bibcode=1983Sci...221..277B |s2cid=31818182 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Baluska |first1=F. |last2=Volkmann |first2=Dieter |last3=Hlavacka |first3=Andrej |last4=Mancuso |first4=Stefano |last5=Barlow |first5=Peter W. |chapter=2. Neurobiological View of Plants and Their Body Plan |editor-last1=Baluska |editor-first1=F. |editor-last2=Marcuso |editor-first2=Stefano |editor-last3=Volkmann |editor-first3=Dieter |title=Communication in Plants: Neuronal Aspects of Plant Life |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IH9N4SKWTokC&pg=PA19 |year=2006 |publisher=Taylor & Francis US |isbn=978-3-540-28475-8 |quote=...the emergence of plant neurobiology as the most recent area of plant sciences. |access-date=15 November 2015 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Barnlund |first1=Dean C. |editor1-last=Akin |editor1-first=Johnnye |editor2-last=Goldberg |editor2-first=Alvin |editor3-last=Myers |editor3-first=Gail |editor4-last=Stewart |editor4-first=Joseph |title=Language Behavior |date=5 July 2013 |orig-date=1970 |publisher=De Gruyter Mouton |isbn=978-3-11-087875-2 |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110878752.43/html?lang=en |language=en |chapter=A Transactional Model of Communication |pages=43–61 |doi=10.1515/9783110878752.43 |access-date=20 December 2022 |archive-date=17 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221117173703/https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110878752.43/html?lang=en |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Berea |first1=Anamaria |title=Emergence of Communication in Socio-Biological Networks |date=16 December 2017 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-319-64565-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OIhDDwAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Berger |first1=Arthur Asa |title=Essentials of Mass Communication Theory |date=5 July 1995 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-0-8039-7357-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AfTl2r4K_wUC&pg=PA12 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Berger |first1=Charles R. |last2=Roloff |first2=Michael E. |last3=Ewoldsen |first3=David R. |editor-last1=Berger |editor-first1=Charles R. |editor-last2=Roloff |editor-first2=Michael E. |editor-last3=Ewoldsen |editor-first3=David R. |title=The Handbook of Communication Science |date=2010 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4129-1813-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gH7F_0kTQTEC |language=en |chapter=1. What Is Communication Science? |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Berlo |first1=David K. |title=The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice |date=1960 |publisher=Holt, Rinehart and Winston |isbn=9780030074905 |oclc=3901269929 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0k9IAAAAMAAJ |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Bernabo |first1=Lawrance M. |chapter=Communication History |editor-last1=Allen |editor-first1=Mike |title=The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods |date=11 April 2017 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4833-8142-8 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4GFCDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA201 |language=en |access-date=20 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Beynon-Davies |first1=P. |title=Significance: Exploring the Nature of Information, Systems and Technology |date=30 November 2010 |publisher=Palgrave MacMillan |isbn=978-0-230-29502-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZnaGDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA52 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Blackburn |first1=Simon |editor1-last=Craig |editor1-first=Edward |title=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=1996 |publisher=Routledge |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/communication-and-intention/v-1 |chapter=Intention and communication |isbn=978-0-415-07310-3 |doi=10.4324/9780415249126-U006-1 |access-date=3 January 2023 |archive-date=3 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230103085525/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/communication-and-intention/v-1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Blackburn |first1=Simon |editor1-last=Craig |editor1-first=Edward |title=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=1996a |publisher=Routledge |url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/meaning-and-communication/v-1 |chapter=Meaning and communication |doi=10.4324/9780415249126-U024-1 |isbn=978-0-415-07310-3 |access-date=3 January 2023 |archive-date=3 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230103085525/https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/meaning-and-communication/v-1 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Blatrix |first1=Rumsaïs |last2=Mayer |first2=Veronika |chapter=Communication in Ant-Plant Symbioses |editor-last1=Baluška |editor-first1=František |editor-last2=Ninkovic |editor-first2=Velemir |title=Plant Communication From an Ecological Perspective |date=5 August 2010 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-642-12162-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9hUpvAoY_HAC&pg=PA1 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Blondheim |first1=Menahem |chapter=Innis, Harold A. |editor-last1=Pooley |editor-first1=Jefferson D. |editor-last2=Rothenbuhler |editor-first2=Eric W. |title=The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, 4 Volume Set |date=31 October 2016 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-29073-6 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eY_2DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA927 |language=en |access-date=2 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Blythe |first1=Jim |title=Key Concepts in Marketing |date=5 March 2009 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-84787-498-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rPgQRbBLdYgC |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Bornstein |first1=Marc H. |chapter=6. Origins of Communication in Infancy |editor-last1=Velichkovsky |editor-first1=Boris M. |editor-last2=Rumbaugh |editor-first2=Duane M. |title=Communicating Meaning: The Evolution and Development of Language |date=1 February 2013 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-1-134-79877-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nyZpbi4IiSoC&pg=PA151 |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Bornstein |first1=Marc H. |last2=Suwalsky |first2=Joan T. D. |last3=Breakstone |first3=Dana A. |title=Emotional relationships between mothers and infants: Knowns, unknowns, and unknown unknowns |journal=Development and Psychopathology |date=February 2012 |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=113–123 |doi=10.1017/S0954579411000708 |pmid=22292998 |pmc=3426791 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Bowman |first1=Caitlyn E. |last2=Arany |first2=Zoltan |last3=Wolfgang |first3=Michael J. |title=Regulation of maternal–fetal metabolic communication |journal=Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences |date=February 2021 |volume=78 |issue=4 |pages=1455–1486 |doi=10.1007/s00018-020-03674-w |pmid=33084944 |pmc=7904600 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Bowman |first1=J. P. |last2=Targowski |first2=A. S. |title=Modeling the Communication Process: The Map Is Not the Territory |journal=Journal of Business Communication |date=1 October 1987 |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=21–34 |doi=10.1177/002194368702400402 |s2cid=145236749 }}
* {{cite journal |last=Braddock |first=Richard |title=An Extension of the 'Lasswell Formula' |journal=Journal of Communication |year=1958 |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=88–93 |doi=10.1111/j.1460-2466.1958.tb01138.x }}
* {{cite book |last1=Bruen |first1=Aiden A. |last2=Forcinito |first2=Mario A. |last3=McQuillan |first3=James M. |title=Cryptography, Information Theory, and Error-Correction: A Handbook for the 21st Century |date=21 July 2021 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-119-58242-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BPcyEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA49 |language=en |access-date=4 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Brønn |first1=Peggy Simcic |chapter=Corporate Communication |editor-last1=Carroll |editor-first1=Craig E. |title=The SAGE Encyclopedia of Corporate Reputation |date=4 May 2016 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4833-7653-0 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zs6UCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT360 |language=en |access-date=4 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Buchanan |first1=David A. |last2=Huczynski |first2=Andrzej |title=Organizational behaviour |date=2017 |publisher=Pearson |isbn=978-1-292-11749-2 |edition=Ninth }}
* {{cite book |last1=Burgoon |first1=Judee K. |last2=Manusov |first2=Valerie |last3=Guerrero |first3=Laura K. |title=Nonverbal Communication |date=8 January 2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-34607-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JqVYCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Burton |first1=Graeme |last2=Dimbleby |first2=Richard |title=Teaching Communication |date=4 January 2002 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-97045-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4XGKAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA126 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Bussmann |first1=Hadumod |title=Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics |date=20 February 2006 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-63038-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O0-9Iw0Qh6EC&pg=PA65 |language=en |access-date=31 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Butterfield |first1=Jeff |title=Illustrated Course Guides : Verbal Communication - Soft Skills for a Digital Workplace |date=29 April 2016 |publisher=Cengage Learning |isbn=978-1-337-34213-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VAJVDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Calabrese |first1=Andrew |last2=Sparks |first2=Colin |title=Toward a Political Economy of Culture: Capitalism and Communication in the Twenty-First Century |date=22 November 2003 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |isbn=978-1-4617-0035-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UT_FAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA85 |language=en |access-date=28 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite web |title=Communication |url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/communication |website=Cambridge Dictionary |access-date=27 September 2022 |author=Cambridge Dictionary staff |date=2022 |archive-date=15 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221015101424/http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/communication |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Capstick |first1=Tony |title=Language and Migration |date=9 September 2020 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-20770-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jW76DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA5 |language=en |access-date=31 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Champoux |first1=Joseph E. |title=Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Organizations |date=22 July 2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-36371-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5Hq3DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA327 |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Chan |first1=Mable |title=English for Business Communication |date=6 January 2020 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-06002-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CmXIDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA180 |language=en |access-date=4 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Chandler |first1=Daniel |last2=Munday |first2=Rod |title=A Dictionary of Media and Communication |date=10 February 2011 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-956875-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nLuJz-ZB828C |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Clough |first1=Sharice |last2=Duff |first2=Melissa C. |title=The Role of Gesture in Communication and Cognition: Implications for Understanding and Treating Neurogenic Communication Disorders |journal=Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |date=2020 |volume=14 |article-number=323 |doi=10.3389/fnhum.2020.00323 |pmid=32903691 |pmc=7438760 |issn=1662-5161 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last=Cobley |first=Paul |chapter=Communication: Definitions and Concepts |date=5 June 2008 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc071 |title=The International Encyclopedia of Communication |editor-last=Donsbach |editor-first=Wolfgang |publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |language=en |doi=10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc071 |isbn=978-1-4051-8640-7 |access-date=20 July 2021 |archive-date=7 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211207043832/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc071 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Cobley |first1=Paul |last2=Schulz |first2=Peter J. |editor-last1=Cobley |editor-first1=Paul |editor-last2=Schulz |editor-first2=Peter J. |title=Theories and Models of Communication |date=30 January 2013 |publisher=De Gruyter Mouton |isbn=978-3-11-024045-0 |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110240450/html |language=en |chapter=Introduction |doi=10.1515/9783110240450 |s2cid=140352429 |access-date=28 November 2022 |archive-date=25 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221225103138/https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110240450/html |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Coren |first1=Stanley |title=How To Speak Dog |date=11 December 2012 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1-4711-0941-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Yzb3K3PykREC&pg=PT42 |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last=Craig |first=Robert T. |date=1999 |title=Communication Theory as a Field |url=https://academic.oup.com/ct/article/9/2/119-161/4201776 |journal=Communication Theory |language=en |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=119–161 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x |access-date=21 July 2021 |archive-date=30 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730074123/https://academic.oup.com/ct/article-abstract/9/2/119/4201776?redirectedFrom=fulltext |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Dance |first1=Frank E. X. |title=The 'Concept' of Communication |journal=Journal of Communication |date=1 June 1970 |volume=20 |issue=2 |pages=201–210 |doi=10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00877.x }}
* {{cite book |last1=Danesi |first1=Marcel |title=Dictionary of Media and Communications |date=2009 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |isbn=978-0-7656-3938-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ajQHjnoAbBQC |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Danesi |first1=Marcel |editor-last1=Danesi |editor-first1=Marcel |title=Encyclopedia of Media and Communication |date=17 June 2013 |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn=978-1-4426-9553-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GZOBAAAAQBAJ |language=en |chapter=Communication |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Danesi |first1=Marcel |editor-last1=Danesi |editor-first1=Marcel |title=Encyclopedia of Media and Communication |date=17 June 2013a |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn=978-1-4426-9553-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GZOBAAAAQBAJ |language=en |chapter=Non-verbal Communication |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Danesi |first1=Marcel |title=Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Media, and Communications |date=1 January 2000 |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn=978-0-8020-8329-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n6XFBxvLzk0C |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last=Davey |first=J. |date=March 1992 |title=Mating Pheromones of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe: Purification and Structural Characterization of M-Factor and Isolation and Analysis of Two Genes Encoding the Pheromone |journal=The EMBO Journal |language=en |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=951–960 |doi=10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05134.x |pmc=556536 |pmid=1547790 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Demuth |first1=Donald R. |last2=Lamont |first2=Richard |editor-last1=Demuth |editor-first1=Donald R. |editor-last2=Lamont |editor-first2=Richard |title=Bacterial Cell-to-Cell Communication: Role in Virulence and Pathogenesis |date=23 February 2006 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-44797-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DnN4kB-UuAwC |language=en |chapter=Preface |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Dixon |first1=Maria A. |chapter=Careers/Jobs in Organizational Communication |editor-last1=Scott |editor-first1=Craig |editor-last2=Lewis |editor-first2=Laurie |title=The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, 4 Volume Set |date=6 March 2017 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-95560-4 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4XHQDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA204 |language=en |access-date=30 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=du Plessis |first1=Neeltje |last2=Lowe |first2=Nicky |last3=Smith |first3=Ailsa Stewart |last4=Sykes |first4=Pam |last5=Wright |first5=Bianca |title=Fresh Perspectives: Professional Communication for Business |date=2007 |publisher=Pearson South Africa |isbn=978-1-86891-593-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ympNWY4wajAC&pg=PA124 |language=en }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Dwyer |first1=Judith |title=Communication for Business and the Professions: Strategies and Skills |date=15 October 2012 |publisher=Pearson Higher Education AU |isbn=978-1-4425-5055-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xhHiBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA12 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Emmeche |first1=Claus |editor1-last=Huyssteen |editor1-first=Jacobus Wentzel Van |title=Encyclopedia of Science and Religion |date=2003 |publisher=Macmillan Reference |isbn=978-0-02-865704-2 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/education/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/biosemiotics |language=en |access-date=17 October 2023 |archive-date=18 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231018092836/https://www.encyclopedia.com/education/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/biosemiotics |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Ezhilarasu |first1=Punitha |title=Educational Technology: Integrating Innovations in Nursing Education |date=1 January 2016 |publisher=Wolters Kluwer |isbn=978-93-5129-722-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kfbsDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA178 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Feicheng |first1=Ma |title=Information Communication |date=31 May 2022 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-031-02293-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E4pyEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA24 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Fielding |first1=Michael |title=Effective Communication in Organisations |date=2006 |publisher=Juta and Company Ltd |isbn=978-0-7021-6650-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2Z_vIcp9gaEC |language=en |access-date=26 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Fiske |first1=John |title=Introduction to Communication Studies |date=2011 |publisher=Routledge |url=https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 |language=en |chapter=1. Communication theory |isbn=978-0-203-13431-3 |access-date=28 November 2022 |archive-date=11 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221011060708/https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Fiske |first1=John |title=Introduction to Communication Studies |date=2011a |publisher=Routledge |url=https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 |language=en |chapter=2. Other models |isbn=978-0-203-13431-3 |access-date=28 November 2022 |archive-date=11 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221011060708/https://www.routledge.com/Introduction-to-Communication-Studies/Fiske/p/book/9780415596497 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Gamble |first1=Teri Kwal |last2=Gamble |first2=Michael W. |title=The Interpersonal Communication Playbook |date=2 January 2019 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-5443-3279-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bUdeDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA14 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Genesee |first1=Fred |chapter=Psycholinguistic aspects |editor-last1=Rivera |editor-first1=Charlene |title=Communicative Competence Approaches to Language Proficiency Assessment: Research and Application |date=1984 |publisher=Multilingual Matters |isbn=978-0-905028-21-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U-05JSBtZF8C&pg=PA139 |language=en |access-date=29 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Giessen |first1=Hans W. |editor1-last=Ally |editor1-first=Mohamed |editor2-last=Khan |editor2-first=Badrul H. |title=International Handbook of E-Learning Volume 2: Implementation and Case Studies |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-64356-2 |language=en |chapter=Media-Based Learning Methodology: Stories, Games, and Emotions |date=2015 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Gilbert |first1=L. |last2=Johnson |first2=D. |chapter=Plant-Plant Communication Through Common Mycorrhizal Networks |editor-last1=Becard |editor-first1=Guillaume |title=How Plants Communicate With Their Biotic Environment |date=17 March 2017 |publisher=Academic Press |isbn=978-0-12-801620-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XPEbDQAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Gill |first1=David |last2=Adams |first2=Bridget |title=ABC of Communication Studies |date=1998 |publisher=Nelson Thornes |isbn=978-0-17-438743-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qhXZU39BVJYC |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Giri |first1=Vijai N. |chapter=Nonverbal Communication Theories |editor-last1=Littlejohn |editor-first1=Stephen W. |editor-last2=Foss |editor-first2=Karen A. |title=Encyclopedia of Communication Theory |date=18 August 2009 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4129-5937-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2veMwywplPUC |language=en }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Givens |first1=David B. |last2=White |first2=John |title=The Routledge Dictionary of Nonverbal Communication |date=26 May 2021 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-000-39140-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UhgoEAAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Green |first1=Corrie |last2=Jiang |first2=Yang |last3=Isaacs |first3=John |editor1-last=Chen |editor1-first=Jessie Y. C. |editor2-last=Fragomeni |editor2-first=Gino |title=Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: 15th International Conference, VAMR 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 23–28, 2023, Proceedings |date=8 July 2023 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-031-35634-6 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HGjKEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA16 |language=en |chapter=Modular 3D Interface Design for Accessible VR Applications }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Grigorik |first1=Ilya |title=High Performance Browser Networking: What Every Web Developer Should Know about Networking and Web Performance |date=11 September 2013 |publisher=O'Reilly Media, Inc. |isbn=978-1-4493-4474-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KfW-AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA93 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Guzman |first1=Andrea L. |editor-last1=Guzman |editor-first1=Andrea L. |title=Human-Machine Communication: Rethinking Communication, Technology, and Ourselves |date=2018 |publisher=Peter Lang Publishing, Incorporated |isbn=978-1-4331-4251-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ML1OtAEACAAJ |language=en |chapter=Introduction: 'What Is HumanMachine Communication, Anyway?' |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Haarmann |first1=Harald |title=Advancement in Ancient Civilizations: Life, Culture, Science and Thought |date=18 September 2020 |publisher=McFarland & Company |isbn=978-1-4766-7989-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FkL_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA157 |language=en |access-date=20 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Håkansson |first1=Gisela |last2=Westander |first2=Jennie |title=Communication in Humans and Other Animals |date=2013 |publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company |isbn=978-90-272-0458-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MAibmQEACAAJ |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hamilton |first1=Cheryl R. |last2=Kroll |first2=Tony L. |last3=Creel |first3=Bonnie |title=Communicating for Success |date=28 February 2023 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-81663-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3L2uEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT46 |language=en |access-date=26 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Harley |first1=Trevor A. |title=The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory |date=2014 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-1-84872-089-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bIsMKQEACAAJ |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite web |author=HarperCollins staff |title=Communication |url=https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=communication&submit.x=58&submit.y=14 |website=www.ahdictionary.com |access-date=27 September 2022 |date=2022 |archive-date=30 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220930123346/https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=communication&submit.x=58&submit.y=14 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Hartley |first1=Peter |last2=Bruckmann |first2=Clive |title=Business Communication |date=28 January 2008 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-64572-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n-OGAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hebb |first1=D. O. |last2=Donderi |first2=D. C. |title=Textbook of Psychology (Psychology Revivals) |date=19 December 2013 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-1-317-81973-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-65mAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT269 |language=en |access-date=31 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |author1=Hillstrom, Northern Lights |author2=Magee, ECDI |editor1-last=Darnay |editor1-first=Arsen |editor2-last=Magee |editor2-first=Monique D. |title=Encyclopedia of Small Business |date=17 October 2006 |publisher=Thomson Gale |isbn=978-0-7876-9112-7 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/entrepreneurs/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/intercultural-communication |language=en |chapter=Intercultural communication |access-date=20 December 2022 |archive-date=20 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221220171707/https://www.encyclopedia.com/entrepreneurs/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/intercultural-communication |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Honeycutt |first1=James M. |chapter=11. Imagined interactions |editor-last1=Berger |editor-first1=Charles R. |title=Interpersonal Communication |date=28 July 2014 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG |isbn=978-3-11-037387-5 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9pbnBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT317 |language=en |access-date=30 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Houston |first1=Susan H. |title=A Survey of Psycholinguistics |date=14 January 2019 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG |isbn=978-3-11-087968-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-hiBDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA266 |language=en |access-date=28 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hura |first1=Gurdeep S. |last2=Singhal |first2=Mukesh |title=Data and Computer Communications: Networking and Internetworking |date=28 March 2001 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-0-8493-0928-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BViV0PoH_voC |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Innis |first1=Harold Adams |title=Empire and Communications |date=1950 |publisher=Clarendon Press |via=Project Gutenberg |url=https://gutenberg.ca/ebooks/innis-empire/innis-empire-00-h.html#A_INTRODUCTION |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 |archive-date=4 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230104175010/http://gutenberg.ca/ebooks/innis-empire/innis-empire-00-h.html#A_INTRODUCTION |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |author=ISU staff |title=Introduction to Public Communication |date=2016 |publisher=Indiana State University Press |url=http://kell.indstate.edu/public-comm-intro/chapter/3-4-functions-of-verbal-communication/ |chapter=3.4: Functions of Verbal Communication |access-date=22 December 2022 |archive-date=27 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221027160836/http://kell.indstate.edu/public-comm-intro/chapter/3-4-functions-of-verbal-communication/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Januszewski |first1=Alan |title=Educational Technology: The Development of a Concept |date=2001 |publisher=Libraries Unlimited |isbn=978-1-56308-749-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mlZsIIoOaSYC&pg=PA29 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Jeanrond |first1=Werner G. |title=Theological Hermeneutics: Development and Significance |date=18 June 1991 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-1-349-09597-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CzWxCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA7 |language=en }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Jenkins |first1=J. Jacob |last2=Chen |first2=Nien-Tsu Nancy |editor1-last=Arrigo |editor1-first=Bruce A. |title=The SAGE Encyclopedia of Surveillance, Security, and Privacy |date=15 June 2016 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4833-5995-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HQJbDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT506 |language=en |chapter=Communication Studies |access-date=20 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Karban |first1=Richard |title=Plant Sensing and Communication |date=18 June 2015 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-26484-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8HOeCQAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kastberg |first1=Peter |title=Knowledge Communication: Contours of a Research Agenda |date=13 December 2019 |publisher=Frank & Timme GmbH |isbn=978-3-7329-0432-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=esLDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA56 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ketcham |first1=Christopher |title=Flowers and Honeybees: A Study of Morality in Nature |date=11 May 2020 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-42854-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IXznDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA100 |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kiggins |first1=Justin T. |last2=Comins |first2=Jordan A. |last3=Gentner |first3=Timothy Q. |chapter=Targets for a Comparative Neurobiology of Language |editor-last1=Scharff |editor-first1=Constance |editor-last2=Friederici |editor-first2=Angela D. |editor-last3=Petrides |editor-first3=Michael |title=Neurobiology of Human Language and Its Evolution: Primate and Nonprimate Perspectives |publisher=Frontiers Media SA |isbn=978-2-88919-111-6 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EEpSexeseW4C&pg=PA121 |language=en |date=2013 |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Krémer |first1=Benoît |last2=Quijano |first2=Claudia Mejía |editor1-last=Malmkjaer |editor1-first=Kirsten |title=The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics |date=14 December 2017 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-43451-1 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6QVDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT121 |language=en |chapter=Non-verbal Communication and Interpreting }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kreps |first1=Gary L. |chapter=The Pervasive Role of Information in Health and Health Care: Implications for Health Communication Policy |editor1-last=Anderson |editor1-first=James A. |title=Communication Yearbook 11 |date=23 May 2012 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-14844-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FrbGuo2mxCMC&pg=PA239 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kreps |first1=Gary L. |chapter=Health Communication |editor-last1=Schement |editor-first1=Jorge Reina |title=Encyclopedia of Communication and Information |date=2002 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |isbn=978-0-02-865385-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cQgjAQAAIAAJ |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kyle |first1=Jim G. |last2=Kyle |first2=James |last3=Woll |first3=Bencie |last4=Pullen |first4=G. |last5=Maddix |first5=F. |title=Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and Their Language |date=26 February 1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-35717-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gcy4MhmLhdkC&pg=PA59 |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lantolf |first1=James P. |chapter=Intrapersonal Communication Theories |editor-last1=Littlejohn |editor-first1=Stephen W. |editor-last2=Foss |editor-first2=Karen A. |title=Encyclopedia of Communication Theory |date=18 August 2009 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4129-5937-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2veMwywplPUC |language=en }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lawson |first1=Celeste |last2=Gill |first2=Robert |last3=Feekery |first3=Angela |last4=Witsel |first4=Mieke |title=Communication Skills for Business Professionals |date=12 June 2019 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-59441-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fIOWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Li |first1=Hong Ling |title=2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing |publisher=IEEE |chapter=From Shannon-Weaver to Boisot: A Review on the Research of Knowledge Transfer Model |date=September 2007 |pages=5434–5437 |doi=10.1109/WICOM.2007.1332 |isbn=978-1-4244-1311-9 |s2cid=15690224 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Luuk |first1=Erkki |last2=Luuk |first2=Hendrik |chapter=Evolutionary Framework for the Language Faculty |editor-last1=Smith |editor-first1=Andrew D. M. |editor-last2=Smith |editor-first2=Kenny |title=The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (EVOLANG7), Barcelona, Spain, 12–15 March 2008 |date=2008 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-277-611-2 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9S1pDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA206 |language=en |access-date=31 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lyon |first1=Arabella |title=Intentions: Negotiated, Contested, and Ignored |date=8 September 1998 |publisher=Penn State Press |isbn=978-0-271-07583-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fWPiCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT31 |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lyons |first1=John |title=Language and Linguistics |date=29 May 1981 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-29775-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8Wg57a3DdYYC |language=en |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=McArthur |first1=Thomas Burns |last2=McArthur |first2=Tom |last3=McArthur |first3=Roshan |title=Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-280637-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QMsWFsI0YkIC&pg=PT232 |language=en |access-date=29 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=McClelland |first1=Charles A. |editor-last1=Darity |editor-first1=William A. |title=International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences |date=2008 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |isbn=978-0-02-865966-4 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/communication-political |language=en |chapter=Communication, Political |access-date=20 December 2022 |archive-date=20 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221220171705/https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/communication-political |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=McCormack |first1=Jane |last2=McLeod |first2=Sharynne |last3=Harrison |first3=Linda |editor1-last=Garvis |editor1-first=Susanne |editor2-last=Pendergast |editor2-first=Donna |title=Health and Wellbeing in Childhood |date=September 2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-316-62300-8 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pdAoDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA60 |language=en |chapter=4. Communication development |access-date=18 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=McDermott |first1=Virginia M. |chapter=Interpersonal Communication Theories |editor-last1=Littlejohn |editor-first1=Stephen W. |editor-last2=Foss |editor-first2=Karen A. |title=Encyclopedia of Communication Theory |date=18 August 2009 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4129-5937-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2veMwywplPUC |language=en }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=McGuire |first1=Morgan |last2=Jenkins |first2=Odest Chadwicke |title=Creating Games: Mechanics, Content, and Technology |date=23 December 2008 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-1-56881-305-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=swvSgicJM5IC&pg=PA373 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=McQuail |first1=Denis |editor1-last=Donsbach |editor1-first=Wolfgang |title=The International Encyclopedia of Communication, 12 Volume Set |date=2008 |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |isbn=978-1-4051-3199-5 |url=https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+International+Encyclopedia+of+Communication%2C+12+Volume+Set-p-9781405131995 |language=en-us |chapter=Models of communication |doi=10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecm089 |access-date=28 November 2022 |archive-date=3 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191003053833/https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+International+Encyclopedia+of+Communication%2C+12+Volume+Set-p-9781405131995 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Meinel |first1=Christoph |last2=Sack |first2=Harald |title=Digital Communication: Communication, Multimedia, Security |date=21 February 2014 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-642-54331-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5O25BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA129 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Meisel |first1=Jürgen M. |title=First and Second Language Acquisition: Parallels and Differences |date=7 July 2011 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-49637-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3ryG0_W4qxcC |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Melkote |first1=Srinivas R. |last2=Steeves |first2=H. Leslie |title=Communication for Development in the Third World: Theory and Practice for Empowerment |date=14 December 2001 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-0-7619-9476-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PKAi6t2e5AEC&pg=PA108 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Melkote |first1=Srinivas R. |chapter=Theories of Development Communication |editor-last1=Mody |editor-first1=Bella |title=International and Development Communication: A 21st-Century Perspective |date=29 April 2003 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-0-7619-2901-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SNmJy7iBYOYC&pg=PA129 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Meng |first1=Xiangfei |title=National Image: China's Communication of Cultural Symbols |date=12 March 2020 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-981-15-3147-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b0HWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA120 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite web |title=Communication |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/communication |website=Merriam-Webster |access-date=27 September 2022 |language=en |author=Merriam-Webster staff |date=2022 |archive-date=27 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927165111/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/communication |url-status=live }}
* {{cite journal |last=Miller |first=Gerald R. |date=1 June 1966 |title=On Defining Communication: Another Stab |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00020.x |journal=Journal of Communication |volume=16 |issue=2 |pages=88–98 |doi=10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00020.x |pmid=5941548 |issn=0021-9916 |access-date=21 July 2021 |archive-date=30 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730074122/https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/16/2/88/4569093?redirectedFrom=fulltext |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }}
* {{cite book |last1=Mills |first1=Kathy A. |title=Literacy Theories for the Digital Age: Social, Critical, Multimodal, Spatial, Material and Sensory Lenses |date=3 December 2015 |publisher=Multilingual Matters |isbn=978-1-78309-464-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ouHnCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT132 |language=en |access-date=29 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Montrul |first1=Silvina |title=The Acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic Development in Monolingual and Bilingual L1 Acquisition and Adult L2 Acquisition |date=1 January 2004 |publisher=John Benjamins Publishing |isbn=978-90-272-5297-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nIRgMn83Rr8C&pg=PA20 |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mullany |first1=Louise |editor-last1=Mullany |editor-first1=Louise |title=Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism |date=11 June 2020 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-41668-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rC3rDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 |language=en |chapter=1. Rethinking Professional Communication: New Departure for Global Workplace Research |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Munodawafa |first1=D. |title=Communication: Concepts, Practice and Challenges |journal=Health Education Research |date=1 June 2008 |volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=369–370 |doi=10.1093/her/cyn024 |pmid=18504296 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Narula |first1=Uma |title=Handbook of Communication Models, Perspectives, Strategies |date=2006 |publisher=Atlantic Publishers & Dist |isbn=978-81-269-0513-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AuRyXwyAJ78C |language=en |chapter=1. Basic Communication Models |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite web |author=National Communication Association |access-date=25 June 2023 |title=What is Communication? |date=26 April 2016 |url=https://www.natcom.org/about-nca/what-communication |archive-date=25 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230625161957/https://www.natcom.org/about-nca/what-communication |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Nawrocki |first1=Waldemar |title=Measurement Systems and Sensors |edition=2 |date=1 January 2016 |publisher=Artech House |isbn=978-1-60807-933-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vW2PCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA340 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nicotera |first1=Anne Maydan |chapter=Constitutive View of Communication |editor-last1=Littlejohn |editor-first1=Stephen W. |editor-last2=Foss |editor-first2=Karen A. |title=Encyclopedia of Communication Theory |date=18 August 2009 |publisher=SAGE Publications |isbn=978-1-4129-5937-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2veMwywplPUC |language=en }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nöth |first1=Winfried |chapter=Human Communication from the Semiotic Perspective |editor-last1=Ibekwe-SanJuan |editor-first1=Fidelia |editor-last2=Dousa |editor-first2=Thomas M. |title=Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge: A Multidisciplinary Approach |date=30 August 2013 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-94-007-6973-1 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ewPFBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA101 |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nöth |first1=Winfried |title=Handbook of Semiotics |date=1995 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-20959-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rHA4KQcPeNgC&pg=PA172 |language=en |access-date=29 October 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Novak |first1=Julie M. |last2=Day |first2=Ashleigh |editor1-last=Fletcher |editor1-first=C. Vail |editor2-last=Lovejoy |editor2-first=Jennette |title=Natural Disasters and Risk Communication: Implications of the Cascadia Subduction Zone Megaquake |date=2018 |publisher=Lexington Books |isbn=978-1-4985-5612-5 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bsBYDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA202 |language=en |chapter=Families, Companion Nonhuman Animals, and the CSZ Disaster: Implications for Crisis and Risk Communication }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nuyts |first1=Jan |last2=Pederson |first2=Eric |editor-last1=Nuyts |editor-first1=Jan |editor-last2=Pederson |editor-first2=Eric |title=Language and Conceptualization |date=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-77481-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k_ZqqaYrftAC&pg=PA1 |language=en |chapter=1. Overview: on the relationship between language and conceptualization |access-date=22 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=O'Day |first1=Danton |editor-last1=O'Day |editor-first1=Danton |title=Sexual Interactions in Eukaryotic Microbes |date=2 December 2012 |publisher=Elsevier |isbn=978-0-323-15097-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kNB4u65WK6MC |language=en |chapter=1. Modes of cellular communication and sexual interactions in eukaryotic microbes |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ongaro |first1=Edoardo |title=Philosophy and Public Administration: An Introduction |date=31 July 2020 |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |isbn=978-1-83910-034-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uljwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA216 |language=en }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Palmer |first1=Michael |title=Hands-On Networking Fundamentals |date=21 June 2012 |publisher=Cengage Learning |isbn=978-1-285-40275-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-QELAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA33 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Papa |first1=Michael J. |last2=Daniels |first2=Tom D. |last3=Spiker |first3=Barry K. |title=Organizational Communication: Perspectives and Trends |date=2008 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4129-1684-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=00m0QPQ07H0C&pg=PA27 |language=en |access-date=28 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Peters |first1=Benjamin |title=Marshall T. Poe, A History of Communications: Media and Society From the Evolution of Speech to the Internet |journal=New Media & Society |date=March 2012 |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=356–359 |doi=10.1177/1461444811429927c |s2cid=45550086 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444811429927c |language=en |issn=1461-4448 |access-date=2 January 2023 |archive-date=2 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230102094339/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444811429927c |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }}
* {{cite book |last1=Peterwagner |first1=Reinhold |title=What is the Matter with Communicative Competence?: An Analysis to Encourage Teachers of English to Assess the Very Basis of Their Teaching |date=2005 |publisher=LIT Verlag Münster |isbn=978-3-8258-8487-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=87BOMKSj1kcC&pg=PA9 |language=en |access-date=29 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Poe |first1=Marshall |title=A History of Communications: Media and Society From the Evolution of Speech to the Internet |date=2011 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-511-97691-9 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Putnam |first1=Linda |last2=Woo |first2=DaJung |last3=Banghart |first3=Scott |title=Organizational Communication |url=https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0137.xml |website=Oxford Bibliographies |year=2017 |access-date=17 December 2022 |language=en |doi=10.1093/OBO/9780199756841-0137 |isbn=978-0-19-975684-1 |archive-date=20 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120060038/https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0137.xml |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Rao |first1=Ming |last2=Wang |first2=Qun |last3=Zhou |first3=Ji |title=Integrated Distributed Intelligent Systems for Engineering Design |date=15 November 1996 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-90-5699-510-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ec3sfGyC_q8C&pg=PA57 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rao |first1=Nageshwar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fBHi4hEuDgYC |title=Communication Skills |date=1 January 2009 |publisher=Himalaya Publishing |isbn=978-81-8318-351-2 |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Reisinger |first1=Yvette |title=International Tourism |date=27 August 2010 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-43888-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pfQifDukxegC&pg=PA166 |language=en |access-date=2 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ren |first1=Fujun |last2=Zhai |first2=Jiequan |title=Communication and Popularization of Science and Technology in China |date=12 November 2013 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-642-39561-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nC6_BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA77 |language=en |access-date=28 September 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rickheit |first1=Gert |last2=Strohner |first2=Hans |last3=Vorwerg |first3=Constanze |editor-last1=Rickheit |editor-first1=Gert |editor-last2=Strohner |editor-first2=Hans |title=Handbook of Communication Competence |date=2008 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-018829-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q2GwvzJTKHYC |language=en |access-date=29 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Riekert |first1=Wolf-Fritz |chapter=What Does Knowledge Look Like? |editor-last1=Gorny |editor-first1=Peter |editor-last2=Tauber |editor-first2=Michael J. |title=Visualization in Human-Computer Interaction: 7th Interdisciplinary Workshop on Informatics and Psychology, Schärding, Austria, May 24–27, 1988. Selected Contributions |date=1990 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-540-52698-8 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kOU5wrsqvcgC&pg=PA42 |language=en |access-date=28 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Robinson |first1=Andrew |title=Writing and Script: A Very Short Introduction |date=27 August 2009 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-956778-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KRsUDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 |language=en |access-date=2 September 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rosengren |first1=Karl Erik |title=Communication: An Introduction |date=11 February 2000 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-0-8039-7837-9 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z_XHi5JMhioC&pg=PA1 |language=en |chapter=1.1 On communication |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Rowitz |first1=Louis |title=Public Health Leadership: Putting Principles Into Practice |date=2014 |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Publishers |isbn=978-1-4496-4521-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RekQlJPS85EC&pg=PA459 |language=en |access-date=28 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ruben |first1=Brent D. |title=Encyclopedia of Communication and Information |date=2001 |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/media/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/models-communication |chapter=Models Of Communication |isbn=978-0-02-865386-0 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |access-date=28 November 2022 |archive-date=31 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221031122937/https://www.encyclopedia.com/media/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/models-communication |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Ruben |first1=Brent D. |chapter=Animal Communication |editor-last1=Schement |editor-first1=Jorge Reina |title=Encyclopedia of Communication and Information |date=2002 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |isbn=978-0-02-865385-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cQgjAQAAIAAJ |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ruben |first1=Brent D. |chapter=Communication Study |editor-last1=Schement |editor-first1=Jorge Reina |title=Encyclopedia of Communication and Information |date=2002a |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |isbn=978-0-02-865385-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cQgjAQAAIAAJ |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Saha |first1=Arijit |last2=Manna |first2=NilotPal |last3=Mandal |first3=Surajit |title=Information Theory, Coding and Cryptography |date=2013 |publisher=Pearson Education India |isbn=978-93-325-1784-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iUI8BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA231 |language=en |access-date=4 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Sapienza |first1=Zachary S. |last2=Iyer |first2=Narayanan |last3=Veenstra |first3=Aaron S. |title=Reading Lasswell's Model of Communication Backward: Three Scholarly Misconceptions |journal=Mass Communication and Society |date=3 September 2015 |volume=18 |issue=5 |pages=599–622 |doi=10.1080/15205436.2015.1063666 |s2cid=146389958 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Schenk |first1=H. Jochen |last2=Seabloom |first2=Eric W. |chapter=Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Signals and Toxins: A Conceptual Framework |editor-last1=Baluška |editor-first1=František |editor-last2=Ninkovic |editor-first2=Velemir |title=Plant Communication From an Ecological Perspective |date=5 August 2010 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-642-12162-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9hUpvAoY_HAC&pg=PA1 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Schramm |first1=Wilbur |title=The Process and Effects of Mass Communication |date=1954 |publisher=University of Illinois Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z2aaAQAACAAJ |language=en |chapter=How communication works |oclc=143518338 |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sebeok |first1=Thomas A. |title=Semiotics in the United States |date=22 September 1991 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-11530-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Moc8XzWbT-QC&pg=PA111 |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Seckbach |first1=Joseph |last2=Gordon |first2=Richard |editor-last1=Gordon |editor-first1=Richard |editor-last2=Seckbach |editor-first2=Joseph |chapter=Introduction to Biocommunication |title=Biocommunication: Sign-mediated Interactions Between Cells And Organisms |date=1 November 2016 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-1-78634-046-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ycOkDQAAQBAJ&pg=PR15 |language=en |access-date=29 September 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Shannon |first1=C. E. |title=A Mathematical Theory of Communication |journal=Bell System Technical Journal |date=July 1948 |volume=27 |issue=3 |pages=379–423 |doi=10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x |bibcode=1948BSTJ...27..379S }}
* {{cite book |last1=Shinder |first1=Debra Littlejohn |title=Computer Networking Essentials |date=2001 |publisher=Cisco Press |isbn=978-1-58713-038-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZMizSUW7XF4C&pg=PA37 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sierra |first1=Lorenzo |chapter=Marketing Communication Today |editor-last1=Gillis |editor-first1=Tamara |title=The IABC Handbook of Organizational Communication: A Guide to Internal Communication, Public Relations, Marketing and Leadership |date=20 April 2006 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-7879-8553-0 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0xL_cHiMfLoC&pg=PA392 |language=en |access-date=4 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Simonson |first1=Peter |last2=Peck |first2=Janice |last3=Craig |first3=Robert T. |last4=Jackson |first4=John |editor-last1=Simonson |editor-first1=Peter |editor-last2=Peck |editor-first2=Janice |editor-last3=Craig |editor-first3=Robert T. |editor-last4=Jackson |editor-first4=John |title=The Handbook of Communication History |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-89259-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X4Vyt506C_QC |language=en |chapter=Introduction |access-date=2 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Simonson |first1=Peter |last2=Peck |first2=Janice |last3=Craig |first3=Robert T. |last4=Jackson |first4=John |editor-last1=Simonson |editor-first1=Peter |editor-last2=Peck |editor-first2=Janice |editor-last3=Craig |editor-first3=Robert T. |editor-last4=Jackson |editor-first4=John |title=The Handbook of Communication History |date=2013a |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-89259-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X4Vyt506C_QC |language=en |chapter=1. The History of Communication History |access-date=2 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sinding |first1=Knud |last2=Waldstrom |first2=Christian |title=Organisational Behaviour |date=2014 |publisher=McGraw Hill Education |isbn=978-0-07-715461-5 |edition=5 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Skyttner |first1=Lars |title=General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice |date=4 January 2006 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-4479-98-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7tvICgAAQBAJ&pg=PA207 |language=en |edition=2nd |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sonderling |first1=Stefan |editor-last1=Plooy |editor-first1=G. M. Du |title=Introduction to Communication |date=30 November 1995 |publisher=Juta and Company Ltd |isbn=978-0-7021-3446-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=54oceJfEV0kC&pg=PA89 |language=en |chapter=5. Historical Research in Communication |access-date=2 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Spitzberg |first1=Brian H. |chapter=The composition of competence: Communication skills |editor-last1=Hannawa |editor-first1=Annegret F. |editor-last2=Spitzberg |editor-first2=Brian H. |title=Communication Competence |date=16 October 2015 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG |isbn=978-3-11-031745-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6ZunCgAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=29 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Stallings |first1=William |title=Data and Computer Communications |date=2014 |publisher=Pearson |isbn=978-0-13-350648-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qSuCnQEACAAJ |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Steinberg |first1=Sheila |title=Introduction to Communication Course Book 1: The Basics |date=1995 |publisher=Juta and Company Ltd |isbn=978-0-7021-3649-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VPs3kidEqXYC |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Steinberg |first1=Sheila |title=An Introduction to Communication Studies |date=2007 |publisher=Juta and Company Ltd |isbn=978-0-7021-7261-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g8GRgXYeo_kC&pg=PA286 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Straubhaar |first1=Joseph |last2=LaRose |first2=Robert |last3=Davenport |first3=Lucinda |title=Media Now: Understanding Media, Culture, and Technology |date=1 January 2015 |publisher=Cengage Learning |isbn=978-1-305-53385-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jUR-BAAAQBAJ&pg=PT47 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=Hal R. |title=A Model for the Communication Process |journal=STWP Review |date=1962 |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=8–10 |jstor=43093688 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43093688 |issn=2376-0761 |access-date=22 December 2022 |archive-date=8 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221108093006/https://www.jstor.org/stable/43093688 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Tengan |first1=Callistus |last2=Aigbavboa |first2=Clinton |last3=Thwala |first3=Wellington Didibhuku |title=Construction Project Monitoring and Evaluation: An Integrated Approach |date=27 April 2021 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-000-38141-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8nQhEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT110 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Thomason |first1=Richmond H. |editor1-last=Borchert |editor1-first=Donald |title=Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy |edition=2 |date=2006 |publisher=Macmillan |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/artificial-and-natural-languages |isbn=978-0-02-865790-5 |chapter=Artificial And Natural Languages |access-date=22 December 2022 |archive-date=22 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221222165732/https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/artificial-and-natural-languages |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Tompkins |first1=Paula S. |title=Practicing Communication Ethics: Development, Discernment, and Decision Making |date=2 May 2023 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-87190-6 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FmuyEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT141 |language=en |chapter=8. Communication Ethics and Digital Communication |access-date=28 October 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |title=Interpersonal Communication |edition=7 |last1=Trenholm |first1=Sarah |last2=Jensen |first2=Arthur |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-19-982750-3 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Turkington |first1=Carol |last2=Harris |first2=Joseph |title=The Encyclopedia of Learning Disabilities |date=2006 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |isbn=978-0-8160-6991-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ePOh9jzjZqQC&pg=PA140 |language=en |access-date=27 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Twidale |first1=Michael |chapter=Human-Computer Interaction |editor-last1=Schement |editor-first1=Jorge Reina |title=Encyclopedia of Communication and Information |date=2002 |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |isbn=978-0-02-865385-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cQgjAQAAIAAJ |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |title=Communication in the Real World |date=29 September 2016 |publisher=University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing |isbn=978-1-946135-07-0 |url=https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-1-communication-history-and-forms/ |language=en-us |chapter=1.1 Communication: History and Forms |author=UMN staff |access-date=20 December 2022 |archive-date=16 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221016022756/https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-1-communication-history-and-forms/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |title=Communication in the Real World |date=29 September 2016a |publisher=University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing |isbn=978-1-946135-07-0 |url=https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ |language=en-us |chapter=1.2 The Communication Process |author=UMN staff |access-date=28 November 2022 |archive-date=18 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221018151128/https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/1-2-the-communication-process/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=US congress, Office of Technology Assessment |title=Critical Connections: Communication for the Future |date=1990 |publisher=US Government Printing Office |isbn=978-1-4289-2182-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BVVdQdURPXsC&pg=PA31 |language=en |access-date=3 January 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=van Trijp |first1=Remi |chapter=Transparency versus Processing Efficiency: A Case Study on German Declension |editor-last1=Poibeau |editor-first1=Thierry |editor-last2=Villavicencio |editor-first2=Aline |title=Language, Cognition, and Computational Models |date=25 January 2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-50678-6 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oqhJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA289 |language=en |access-date=26 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Vocate |first1=Donna R. |editor-last1=Vocate |editor-first1=Donna R. |title=Intrapersonal Communication: Different Voices, Different Minds |date=6 December 2012 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-60184-2 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fZOk5Fpuj54C&pg=PA14 |language=en |chapter=1. Self-Talk and Inner Speech: Understanding The Uniquely Human Aspects of Intrapersonal Communication |access-date=20 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=von Kriegstein |first1=Katharina |chapter=A Multisensory Perspective on Human Auditory Communication |editor-last1=Murray |editor-first1=Micah M. |editor-last2=Wallace |editor-first2=Mark T. |title=The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes |date=25 August 2011 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-1-4398-1217-4 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pRV1XsOyAc8C&pg=PA683 |language=en |access-date=30 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Waters |first1=Christopher M. |last2=Bassler |first2=Bonnie L. |title=Quorum Sensing: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria |journal=Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology |date=1 November 2005 |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=319–346 |doi=10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001 |pmid=16212498 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Watson |first1=James |last2=Hill |first2=Anne |title=Dictionary of Media and Communication Studies |date=16 February 2012 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-84966-563-6 |language=en |edition=8th }}
* {{cite book |last1=Watson |first1=James |last2=Hill |first2=Anne |title=Dictionary of Media and Communication Studies |date=22 October 2015 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-62892-149-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IdGBCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA20 |language=en |edition=9th |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Weaver |first1=Warren |title=The Mathematical Theory of Communication |date=1 September 1998 |publisher=University of Illinois Press |isbn=978-0-252-72546-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fRrvAAAAMAAJ |language=en |chapter=Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite journal |last=Wenxiu |first=Peng |date=1 September 2015 |title=Analysis of New Media Communication Based on Lasswell's '5W' Model |journal=Journal of Educational and Social Research |doi=10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n3p245 |issn=2239-978X |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Winner |first1=Ellen |editor-last1=Winner |editor-first1=Ellen |title=Developmental Perspectives on Metaphor: A Special Issue of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity |date=5 September 2017 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-1-317-77779-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YBw0DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT29 |language=en |chapter=Understanding Versus Discriminating Nonliteral Utterances: Evidence for a Dissociation |access-date=26 August 2023 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Wisely |first1=Forrest G. |chapter=Communication Models |editor-last1=Moore |editor-first1=David Mike |title=Visual Literacy: A Spectrum of Visual Learning |date=1994 |publisher=Educational Technology |isbn=978-0-87778-264-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=icMsdAGHQpEC&pg=PA90 |language=en |access-date=28 November 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Wittmann |first1=Ralph |last2=Zitterbart |first2=Martina |title=Multicast Communication: Protocols, Programming, & Applications |date=16 June 2000 |publisher=Elsevier |isbn=978-0-08-049734-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bRyEfBCxIRsC&pg=PA1 |language=en |access-date=31 December 2022 }}{{cbignore}}
* {{cite book |last1=Yule |first1=George |title=The Study of Language |date=2010 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-76527-5 |edition=4th }}
{{refend}}


==External links==
==External links==
* {{wikiquote-inline}}
* {{wikiquote-inline}}
* {{commons category-inline|Communication}}
* {{commons category-inline|Communication}}
 
{{Communication studies}}
{{Communication studies|state=expanded}}
{{Human intelligence topics}}
{{Human intelligence topics|state=expanded}}
{{Technology topics|state=expanded}}
{{Authority control|state=expanded}}
 
{{Nonverbal communication}}
{{Nonverbal communication}}
{{Informatics}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Communication| ]]
[[Category:Communication| ]]
[[Category:Communication studies]]
[[Category:Scoutcraft]]
[[Category:Main topic articles]]
[[Category:Main topic articles]]
[[Category:Society]]
[[Category:Broad-concept articles]]

Latest revision as of 03:24, 14 February 2026


Lua error in Module:Effective_protection_level at line 16: attempt to index field 'FlaggedRevs' (a nil value).

Statue of two businessmen talking
Photo of two women using sign language
Photo of a letter
Photo of a singing bird
Photo of two bees interacting with each other
Illustration of the Pioneer plaque
There are many forms of communication, including human linguistic communication using sounds, sign language, and writing as well as animals exchanging information and attempts to communicate with intelligent extraterrestrial life.

Communication is commonly defined as the transmission of information. Its precise definition is disputed and there are disagreements about whether unintentional or failed transmissions are included and whether communication not only transmits meaning but also creates it. Models of communication are simplified overviews of its main components and their interactions. Many models include the idea that a source uses a coding system to express information in the form of a message. The message is sent through a channel to a receiver who has to decode it to understand it. The main field of inquiry investigating communication is called communication studies.

A common way to classify communication is by whether information is exchanged between humans, members of other species, or non-living entities such as computers. For human communication, a central contrast is between verbal and non-verbal communication. Verbal communication involves the exchange of messages in linguistic form, including spoken and written messages as well as sign language. Non-verbal communication happens without the use of a linguistic system, for example, using body language, touch, and facial expressions. Another distinction is between interpersonal communication, which happens between distinct persons, and intrapersonal communication, which is communication with oneself. Communicative competence is the ability to communicate well and applies to the skills of formulating messages and understanding them.

Non-human forms of communication include animal and plant communication. Researchers in this field often refine their definition of communicative behavior by including the criteria that observable responses are present and that the participants benefit from the exchange. Animal communication is used in areas like courtship and mating, parent–offspring relations, navigation, and self-defense. Communication through chemicals is particularly important for the relatively immobile plants. For example, maple trees release so-called volatile organic compounds into the air to warn other plants of a herbivore attack. Most communication takes place between members of the same species. The reason is that its purpose is usually some form of cooperation, which is not as common between different species. Interspecies communication happens mainly in cases of symbiotic relationships. For instance, many flowers use symmetrical shapes and distinctive colors to signal to insects where nectar is located. Humans engage in interspecies communication when interacting with pets and working animals.

Human communication has a long history and how people exchange information has evolved over time. These changes were usually triggered by the development of new communication technologies. Examples are the invention of writing systems, the development of mass printing, the use of radio and television, and the invention of the internet. The technological advances also led to new forms of communication, such as the exchange of data between computers.

Definitions[edit | edit source]

The word communication has its root in the Latin verb communicare, which means Template:Gloss or Template:Gloss.[1] Communication is usually understood as the transmission of information:[2] a message is conveyed from a sender to a receiver using some medium, such as sound, written signs, bodily movements, or electricity.[3] Sender and receiver are often distinct individuals but it is also possible for an individual to communicate with themselves. In some cases, sender and receiver are not individuals but groups like organizations, social classes, or nations.[4] In a different sense, the term communication refers to the message that is being communicated or to the field of inquiry studying communicational phenomena.[5]

The precise characterization of communication is disputed. Many scholars have raised doubts that any single definition can capture the term accurately. These difficulties come from the fact that the term is applied to diverse phenomena in different contexts, often with slightly different meanings.[6] The issue of the right definition affects the research process on many levels. This includes issues like which empirical phenomena are observed, how they are categorized, which hypotheses and laws are formulated as well as how systematic theories based on these steps are articulated.[7]

Some definitions are broad and encompass unconscious and non-human behavior.[8] Under a broad definition, many animals communicate within their own species and flowers communicate by signaling the location of nectar to bees through their colors and shapes.[9] Other definitions restrict communication to conscious interactions among human beings.[10] Some approaches focus on the use of symbols and signs while others stress the role of understanding, interaction, power, or transmission of ideas. Various characterizations see the communicator's intent to send a message as a central component. In this view, the transmission of information is not sufficient for communication if it happens unintentionally.[11] A version of this view is given by philosopher Paul Grice, who identifies communication with actions that aim to make the recipient aware of the communicator's intention.[12] One question in this regard is whether only successful transmissions of information should be regarded as communication.[13] For example, distortion may interfere with and change the actual message from what was originally intended.[14] A closely related problem is whether acts of deliberate deception constitute communication.[15]

According to a broad definition by literary critic I. A. Richards, communication happens when one mind acts upon its environment to transmit its own experience to another mind.[16] Another interpretation is given by communication theorists Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver, who characterize communication as a transmission of information brought about by the interaction of several components, such as a source, a message, an encoder, a channel, a decoder, and a receiver.[17] The transmission view is rejected by transactional and constitutive views, which hold that communication is not just about the transmission of information but also about the creation of meaning. Transactional and constitutive perspectives hold that communication shapes the participant's experience by conceptualizing the world and making sense of their environment and themselves.[18] Researchers studying animal and plant communication focus less on meaning-making. Instead, they often define communicative behavior as having other features, such as playing a beneficial role in survival and reproduction, or having an observable response.[19]

Models of communication[edit | edit source]

Models of communication are conceptual representations of the process of communication.[20] Their goal is to provide a simplified overview of its main components. This makes it easier for researchers to formulate hypotheses, apply communication-related concepts to real-world cases, and test predictions.[21] Due to their simplified presentation, they may lack the conceptual complexity needed for a comprehensive understanding of all the essential aspects of communication. They are usually presented visually in the form of diagrams showing the basic components and their interaction.[22]

Models of communication are often categorized based on their intended applications and how they conceptualize communication. Some models are general in the sense that they are intended for all forms of communication. Specialized models aim to describe specific forms, such as models of mass communication.[23]

One influential way to classify communication is to distinguish between linear transmission, interaction, and transaction models.[24] Linear transmission models focus on how a sender transmits information to a receiver. They are linear because this flow of information only goes in a single direction.[25] This view is rejected by interaction models, which include a feedback loop. Feedback is needed to describe many forms of communication, such as a conversation, where the listener may respond to a speaker by expressing their opinion or by asking for clarification. Interaction models represent the process as a form of two-way communication in which the communicators take turns sending and receiving messages.[26] Transaction models further refine this picture by allowing representations of sending and responding at the same time. This modification is needed to describe how the listener can give feedback in a face-to-face conversation while the other person is talking. Examples are non-verbal feedback through body posture and facial expression. Transaction models also hold that meaning is produced during communication and does not exist independently of it.[27]

Diagram showing the five components of Lasswell's model: communicator, message, medium, recipient, and effect
Lasswell's model of communication, which is based on five questions corresponding to five basic components

All the early models, developed in the middle of the 20th century, are linear transmission models. Lasswell's model, for example, is based on five fundamental questions: "Who?", "Says what?", "In which channel?", "To whom?", and "With what effect?".[28] The goal of these questions is to identify the basic components involved in the communicative process: the sender, the message, the channel, the receiver, and the effect.[29] Lasswell's model was initially only conceived as a model of mass communication, but it has been applied to other fields as well. Some communication theorists, like Richard Braddock, have expanded it by including additional questions, like "Under what circumstances?" and "For what purpose?".[30]

Diagram of the Shannon–Weaver model showing the different steps of a message on its way to the destination
Shannon–Weaver model of communication, which focuses on how a message is first translated into a signal and then back into a message

The Shannon–Weaver model is another influential linear transmission model.[31] It is based on the idea that a source creates a message, which is then translated into a signal by a transmitter. Noise may interfere with and distort the signal. Once the signal reaches the receiver, it is translated back into a message and made available to the destination. For a landline telephone call, the person calling is the source and their telephone is the transmitter. The transmitter translates the message into an electrical signal that travels through the wire, which acts as the channel. The person taking the call is the destination and their telephone is the receiver.[32] The Shannon–Weaver model includes an in-depth discussion of how noise can distort the signal and how successful communication can be achieved despite noise. This can happen by making the message partially redundant so that decoding is possible nonetheless.[33] Other influential linear transmission models include Gerbner's model and Berlo's model.[34]

Diagram of the feedback loop in Schramm's model of communication
Schramm's model of communication, which focuses on the processes of encoding and decoding as well as feedback

The earliest interaction model was developed by communication theorist Wilbur Schramm.[35] He states that communication starts when a source has an idea and expresses it in the form of a message. This process is called encoding and happens using a code, i.e. a sign system that is able to express the idea, for instance, through visual or auditory signs.[36] The message is sent to a destination, who has to decode and interpret it to understand it.[37] In response, they formulate their own idea, encode it into a message, and send it back as a form of feedback. Another innovation of Schramm's model is that previous experience is necessary to be able to encode and decode messages. For communication to be successful, the fields of experience of source and destination have to overlap.[38]

The first transactional model was proposed by communication theorist Dean Barnlund in 1970.[39] He understands communication as "the production of meaning, rather than the production of messages".[40] Its goal is to decrease uncertainty and arrive at a shared understanding.[41] This happens in response to external and internal cues. Decoding is the process of ascribing meaning to them and encoding consists in producing new behavioral cues as a response.[42]

Human[edit | edit source]

There are many forms of human communication. A central distinction is whether language is used, as in the contrast between verbal and non-verbal communication. A further distinction concerns whether one communicates with others or with oneself, as in the contrast between interpersonal and intrapersonal communication.[43] Forms of human communication are also categorized by their channel or the medium used to transmit messages.[44] The field studying human communication is known as anthroposemiotics.[45]

Verbal[edit | edit source]

Verbal communication is the exchange of messages in linguistic form, i.e., by means of language.[46] In colloquial usage, verbal communication is sometimes restricted to oral communication and may exclude writing and sign language. However, in academic discourse, the term is usually used in a wider sense, encompassing any form of linguistic communication, whether through speech, writing, or gestures.[47] Some of the challenges in distinguishing verbal from non-verbal communication come from the difficulties in defining what exactly language means. Language is usually understood as a conventional system of symbols and rules used for communication. Such systems are based on a set of simple units of meaning that can be combined to express more complex ideas. The rules for combining the units into compound expressions are called grammar. Words are combined to form sentences.[48]

One hallmark of human language, in contrast to animal communication, lies in its complexity and expressive power. Human language can be used to refer not just to concrete objects in the here-and-now but also to spatially and temporally distant objects and to abstract ideas.[49] Humans have a natural tendency to acquire their native language in childhood. They are also able to learn other languages later in life as second languages. However, this process is less intuitive and often does not result in the same level of linguistic competence.[50] The academic discipline studying language is called linguistics. Its subfields include semantics (the study of meaning), morphology (the study of word formation), syntax (the study of sentence structure), pragmatics (the study of language use), and phonetics (the study of basic sounds).[51]

A central contrast among languages is between natural and artificial or constructed languages. Natural languages, like English, Spanish, and Japanese, developed naturally and for the most part unplanned in the course of history. Artificial languages, like Esperanto, Quenya, C++, and the language of first-order logic, are purposefully designed from the ground up.[52] Most everyday verbal communication happens using natural languages. Central forms of verbal communication are speech and writing together with their counterparts of listening and reading.[53] Spoken languages use sounds to produce signs and transmit meaning while for writing, the signs are physically inscribed on a surface.[54] Sign languages, like American Sign Language and Nicaraguan Sign Language, are another form of verbal communication. They rely on visual means, mostly by using gestures with hands and arms, to form sentences and convey meaning.[55]

Verbal communication serves various functions. One key function is to exchange information, i.e. an attempt by the speaker to make the audience aware of something, usually of an external event. But language can also be used to express the speaker's feelings and attitudes. A closely related role is to establish and maintain social relations with other people. Verbal communication is also utilized to coordinate one's behavior with others and influence them. In some cases, language is not employed for an external purpose but only for entertainment or personal enjoyment.[56] Verbal communication further helps individuals conceptualize the world around them and themselves. This affects how perceptions of external events are interpreted, how things are categorized, and how ideas are organized and related to each other.[57]

Non-verbal[edit | edit source]

Photo of a handshake
Shaking hands is one form of non-verbal communication.

Non-verbal communication is the exchange of information through non-linguistic modes, like facial expressions, gestures, and postures.[58] However, not every form of non-verbal behavior constitutes non-verbal communication. Some theorists, like Judee Burgoon, hold that it depends on the existence of a socially shared coding system that is used to interpret the meaning of non-verbal behavior.[59] Non-verbal communication has many functions. It frequently contains information about emotions, attitudes, personality, interpersonal relations, and private thoughts.[60]

Non-verbal communication often happens unintentionally and unconsciously, like sweating or blushing, but there are also conscious intentional forms, like shaking hands or raising a thumb.[61] It often happens simultaneously with verbal communication and helps optimize the exchange through emphasis and illustration or by adding additional information. Non-verbal cues can clarify the intent behind a verbal message.[62] Using multiple modalities of communication in this way usually makes communication more effective if the messages of each modality are consistent.[63] However, in some cases different modalities can contain conflicting messages. For example, a person may verbally agree with a statement but press their lips together, thereby indicating disagreement non-verbally.[64]

There are many forms of non-verbal communication. They include kinesics, proxemics, haptics, paralanguage, chronemics, and physical appearance.[65] Kinesics studies the role of bodily behavior in conveying information. It is commonly referred to as body language, even though it is, strictly speaking, not a language but rather non-verbal communication. It includes many forms, like gestures, postures, walking styles, and dance.[66] Facial expressions, like laughing, smiling, and frowning, all belong to kinesics and are expressive and flexible forms of communication.[67] Oculesics is another subcategory of kinesics in regard to the eyes. It covers questions like how eye contact, gaze, blink rate, and pupil dilation form part of communication.[68] Some kinesic patterns are inborn and involuntary, like blinking, while others are learned and voluntary, like giving a military salute.[69]

Proxemics studies how personal space is used in communication. The distance between the speakers reflects their degree of familiarity and intimacy with each other as well as their social status.[70] Haptics examines how information is conveyed using touching behavior, like handshakes, holding hands, kissing, or slapping. Meanings linked to haptics include care, concern, anger, and violence. For instance, handshaking is often seen as a symbol of equality and fairness, while refusing to shake hands can indicate aggressiveness. Kissing is another form often used to show affection and erotic closeness.[71]

Paralanguage, also known as vocalics, encompasses non-verbal elements in speech that convey information. Paralanguage is often used to express the feelings and emotions that the speaker has but does not explicitly state in the verbal part of the message. It is not concerned with the words used but with how they are expressed. This includes elements like articulation, lip control, rhythm, intensity, pitch, fluency, and loudness.[72] For example, saying something loudly and in a high pitch conveys a different meaning on the non-verbal level than whispering the same words. Paralanguage is mainly concerned with spoken language but also includes aspects of written language, like the use of colors and fonts as well as spatial arrangement in paragraphs and tables.[73] Non-linguistic sounds may also convey information; crying indicates that an infant is distressed, and babbling conveys information about infant health and well-being.[74]

Chronemics concerns the use of time, such as what messages are sent by being on time versus late for a meeting.[75] The physical appearance of the communicator, such as height, weight, hair, skin color, gender, clothing, tattooing, and piercing, also carries information.[76] Appearance is an important factor for first impressions but is more limited as a mode of communication since it is less changeable.[77] Some forms of non-verbal communication happen using such artifacts as drums, smoke, batons, traffic lights, and flags.[78]

Non-verbal communication can also happen through visual media like paintings and drawings. They can express what a person or an object looks like and can also convey other ideas and emotions. In some cases, this type of non-verbal communication is used in combination with verbal communication, for example, when diagrams or maps employ labels to include additional linguistic information.[79]

Traditionally, most research focused on verbal communication. However, this paradigm began to shift in the 1950s when research interest in non-verbal communication increased and emphasized its influence.[80] For example, many judgments about the nature and behavior of other people are based on non-verbal cues.[81] It is further present in almost every communicative act to some extent and certain parts of it are universally understood.[82] These considerations have prompted some communication theorists, like Ray Birdwhistell, to claim that the majority of ideas and information is conveyed this way.[83] It has also been suggested that human communication is at its core non-verbal and that words can only acquire meaning because of non-verbal communication.[84] The earliest forms of human communication, such as crying and babbling, are non-verbal.[85] Some basic forms of communication happen even before birth between mother and embryo and include information about nutrition and emotions.[86] Non-verbal communication is studied in various fields besides communication studies, like linguistics, semiotics, anthropology, and social psychology.[87]

Interpersonal[edit | edit source]

Photo of two women talking
Kathy Matayoshi and Mazie Hirono conversing in the White House, an example of interpersonal communication

Interpersonal communication is communication between distinct people. Its typical form is dyadic communication, i.e. between two people, but it can also refer to communication within groups.[88] It can be planned or unplanned and occurs in many forms, like when greeting someone, during salary negotiations, or when making a phone call.[89] Some communication theorists, like Virginia M. McDermott, understand interpersonal communication as a fuzzy concept that manifests in degrees.[90] In this view, an exchange varies in how interpersonal it is based on several factors. It depends on how many people are present, and whether it happens face-to-face rather than through telephone or email. A further factor concerns the relation between the communicators:[91] group communication and mass communication are less typical forms of interpersonal communication and some theorists treat them as distinct types.[92]

Interpersonal communication can be synchronous or asynchronous. For asynchronous communication, the parties take turns in sending and receiving messages. This occurs when exchanging letters or emails. For synchronous communication, both parties send messages at the same time.[93] This happens when one person is talking while the other person sends non-verbal messages in response signaling whether they agree with what is being said.[94] Some communication theorists, like Sarah Trenholm and Arthur Jensen, distinguish between content messages and relational messages. Content messages express the speaker's feelings toward the topic of discussion. Relational messages, on the other hand, demonstrate the speaker's feelings toward their relation with the other participants.[95]

Various theories of the function of interpersonal communication have been proposed. Some focus on how it helps people make sense of their world and create society. Others hold that its primary purpose is to understand why other people act the way they do and to adjust one's behavior accordingly.[96] A closely related approach is to focus on information and see interpersonal communication as an attempt to reduce uncertainty about others and external events.[97] Other explanations understand it in terms of the needs it satisfies. This includes the needs of belonging somewhere, being included, being liked, maintaining relationships, and influencing the behavior of others.[98] On a practical level, interpersonal communication is used to coordinate one's actions with the actions of others to get things done.[99] Research on interpersonal communication includes topics like how people build, maintain, and dissolve relationships through communication. Other questions are why people choose one message rather than another and what effects these messages have on the communicators and their relation. A further topic is how to predict whether two people would like each other.[100]

Intrapersonal[edit | edit source]

Painting of a woman daydreaming
Paul César Helleu's 1901 painting, Rêverie (Daydream) featuring Alice Guérin. Daydreaming is a form of intrapersonal communication.

Intrapersonal communication is communication with oneself.[101] In some cases this manifests externally, such as when engaged in a monologue, taking notes, highlighting a passage, and writing a diary or a shopping list. But many forms of intrapersonal communication happen internally in the form of an inner exchange with oneself, as when thinking about something or daydreaming.[102] Closely related to intrapersonal communication is communication that takes place within an organism below the personal level, such as exchange of information between organs or cells.[103]

Intrapersonal communication can be triggered by internal and external stimuli. It may happen in the form of articulating a phrase before expressing it externally. Other forms are to make plans for the future and to attempt to process emotions to calm oneself down in stressful situations.[104] It can help regulate one's own mental activity and outward behavior as well as internalize cultural norms and ways of thinking.[105] External forms of intrapersonal communication can aid one's memory. This happens, for example, when making a shopping list. Another use is to unravel difficult problems, as when solving a complex mathematical equation line by line. New knowledge can also be internalized this way, such as when repeating new vocabulary to oneself. Because of these functions, intrapersonal communication can be understood as "an exceptionally powerful and pervasive tool for thinking."[106]

Based on its role in self-regulation, some theorists have suggested that intrapersonal communication is more basic than interpersonal communication. Young children sometimes use egocentric speech while playing in an attempt to direct their own behavior. In this view, interpersonal communication only develops later when the child moves from their early egocentric perspective to a more social perspective.[107] A different explanation holds that interpersonal communication is more basic since it is first used by parents to regulate what their child does. Once the child has learned this, they can apply the same technique to themselves to get more control over their own behavior.[108]

Channels[edit | edit source]

For communication to be successful, the message has to travel from the sender to the receiver. The channel is the way this is accomplished. It is not concerned with the meaning of the message but only with the technical means of how the meaning is conveyed.[109] Channels are often understood in terms of the senses used to perceive the message, i.e. hearing, seeing, smelling, touching, and tasting.[110] But in the widest sense, channels encompass any form of transmission, including technological means like books, cables, radio waves, telephones, or television.[111] Naturally transmitted messages usually fade rapidly whereas some messages using artificial channels have a much longer lifespan, as in the case of books or sculptures.[112]

The physical characteristics of a channel have an impact on the code and cues that can be used to express information. For example, typical telephone calls are restricted to the use of verbal language and paralanguage but exclude facial expressions. It is often possible to translate messages from one code into another to make them available to a different channel. An example is writing down a spoken message or expressing it using sign language.[113]

The transmission of information can occur through multiple channels at once. For example, face-to-face communication often combines the auditory channel to convey verbal information with the visual channel to transmit non-verbal information using gestures and facial expressions. Employing multiple channels can enhance the effectiveness of communication by helping the receiver better understand the subject matter.[114] The choice of channels often matters since the receiver's ability to understand may vary depending on the chosen channel. For instance, a teacher may decide to present some information orally and other information visually, depending on the content and the student's preferred learning style. This underlines the role of a media-adequate approach.[115]

Communicative competence[edit | edit source]

Communicative competence is the ability to communicate effectively or to choose the appropriate communicative behavior in a given situation.[116] It concerns what to say, when to say it, and how to say it.[117] It further includes the ability to receive and understand messages.[118] Competence is often contrasted with performance since competence can be present even if it is not exercised, while performance consists in the realization of this competence.[119] However, some theorists reject a stark contrast and hold that performance is the observable part and is used to infer competence in relation to future performances.[120]

Two central components of communicative competence are effectiveness and appropriateness.[121] Effectiveness is the degree to which the speaker achieves their desired outcomes or the degree to which preferred alternatives are realized.[122] This means that whether a communicative behavior is effective does not just depend on the actual outcome but also on the speaker's intention, i.e. whether this outcome was what they intended to achieve. Because of this, some theorists additionally require that the speaker be able to give an explanation of why they engaged in one behavior rather than another.[123] Effectiveness is closely related to efficiency, the difference being that effectiveness is about achieving goals while efficiency is about using few resources (such as time, effort, and money) in the process.[124]

Appropriateness means that the communicative behavior meets social standards and expectations.[125] Communication theorist Brian H. Spitzberg defines it as "the perceived legitimacy or acceptability of behavior or enactments in a given context".[126] This means that the speaker is aware of the social and cultural context in order to adapt and express the message in a way that is considered acceptable in the given situation.[127] For example, to bid farewell to their teacher, a student may use the expression "Goodbye, sir" but not the expression "I gotta split, man", which they may use when talking to a peer.[128] To be both effective and appropriate means to achieve one's preferred outcomes in a way that follows social standards and expectations.[129] Some definitions of communicative competence put their main emphasis on either effectiveness or appropriateness while others combine both features.[130]

Many additional components of communicative competence have been suggested, such as empathy, control, flexibility, sensitivity, and knowledge.[131] It is often discussed in terms of the individual skills employed in the process, i.e. the specific behavioral components that make up communicative competence.[132] Message production skills include reading and writing. They are correlated with the reception skills of listening and reading.[133] There are both verbal and non-verbal communication skills.[134] For example, verbal communication skills involve the proper understanding of a language, including its phonology, orthography, syntax, lexicon, and semantics.[135]

Many aspects of human life depend on successful communication, from ensuring basic necessities of survival to building and maintaining relationships.[136] Communicative competence is a key factor regarding whether a person is able to reach their goals in social life, like having a successful career and finding a suitable spouse.[137] Because of this, it can have a large impact on the individual's well-being.[138] The lack of communicative competence can cause problems both on the individual and the societal level, including professional, academic, and health problems.[139]

Barriers to effective communication can distort the message. They may result in failed communication and cause undesirable effects. This can happen if the message is poorly expressed because it uses terms with which the receiver is not familiar, or because it is not relevant to the receiver's needs, or because it contains too little or too much information. Distraction, selective perception, and lack of attention to feedback may also be responsible.[140] Noise is another negative factor. It concerns influences that interfere with the message on its way to the receiver and distort it.[141] Crackling sounds during a telephone call are one form of noise. Ambiguous expressions can also inhibit effective communication and make it necessary to disambiguate between possible interpretations to discern the sender's intention.[142] These interpretations depend also on the cultural background of the participants. Significant cultural differences constitute an additional obstacle and make it more likely that messages are misinterpreted.[143]

Other species[edit | edit source]

Photo of a wolf howling
Wolves communicate by howling.

Besides human communication, there are many other forms of communication found in the animal kingdom and among plants. They are studied in fields like biocommunication and biosemiotics.[144] There are additional obstacles in this area for judging whether communication has taken place between two individuals. Acoustic signals are often easy to notice and analyze for scientists, but it is more difficult to judge whether tactile or chemical changes should be understood as communicative signals rather than as other biological processes.[145]

For this reason, researchers often use slightly altered definitions of communication to facilitate their work. A common assumption in this regard comes from evolutionary biology and holds that communication should somehow benefit the communicators in terms of natural selection.[146] The biologists Rumsaïs Blatrix and Veronika Mayer define communication as "the exchange of information between individuals, wherein both the signaller and receiver may expect to benefit from the exchange".[147] According to this view, the sender benefits by influencing the receiver's behavior and the receiver benefits by responding to the signal. These benefits should exist on average but not necessarily in every single case. This way, deceptive signaling can also be understood as a form of communication. One problem with the evolutionary approach is that it is often difficult to assess the impact of such behavior on natural selection.[148] Another common pragmatic constraint is to hold that it is necessary to observe a response by the receiver following the signal when judging whether communication has occurred.[149]

Animals[edit | edit source]

Animal communication is the process of giving and taking information among animals.[150] The field studying animal communication is called zoosemiotics.[151] There are many parallels to human communication. One is that humans and many animals express sympathy by synchronizing their movements and postures.[152] Nonetheless, there are also significant differences, like the fact that humans also engage in verbal communication, which uses language, while animal communication is restricted to non-verbal (i.e. non-linguistic) communication.[153] Some theorists have tried to distinguish human from animal communication based on the claim that animal communication lacks a referential function and is thus not able to refer to external phenomena. However, various observations seem to contradict this view, such as the warning signals in response to different types of predators used by vervet monkeys, Gunnison's prairie dogs, and red squirrels.[154] A further approach is to draw the distinction based on the complexity of human language, especially its almost limitless ability to combine basic units of meaning into more complex meaning structures. One view states that recursion sets human language apart from all non-human communicative systems.[155] Another difference is that human communication is frequently linked to the conscious intention to send information, which is often not discernable for animal communication.[156] Despite these differences, some theorists use the term "animal language" to refer to certain communicative patterns in animal behavior that have similarities with human language.[157]

Photo of a glowing firefly
Many species of fireflies, such as the Lampyris noctiluca, communicate with light to attract mates.

Animal communication can take a variety of forms, including visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, and gustatory communication. Visual communication happens in the form of movements, gestures, facial expressions, and colors. Examples are movements seen during mating rituals, the colors of birds, and the rhythmic light of fireflies. Auditory communication takes place through vocalizations by species like birds, primates, and dogs. Auditory signals are frequently used to alert and warn. Lower-order living systems often have simple response patterns to auditory messages, reacting either by approach or avoidance.[158] More complex response patterns are observed for higher animals, which may use different signals for different types of predators and responses. For example, some primates use one set of signals for airborne predators and another for land predators.[159] Tactile communication occurs through touch, vibration, stroking, rubbing, and pressure. It is especially relevant for parent-young relations, courtship, social greetings, and defense. Olfactory and gustatory communication happen chemically through smells and tastes, respectively.[160]

There are large differences between species concerning what functions communication plays, how much it is realized, and the behavior used to communicate.[161] Common functions include the fields of courtship and mating, parent-offspring relations, social relations, navigation, self-defense, and territoriality.[162] One part of courtship and mating consists in identifying and attracting potential mates. This can happen through various means. Grasshoppers and crickets communicate acoustically by using songs, moths rely on chemical means by releasing pheromones, and fireflies send visual messages by flashing light.[163] For some species, the offspring depends on the parent for its survival. One central function of parent-offspring communication is to recognize each other. In some cases, the parents are also able to guide the offspring's behavior.[164]

Social animals, like chimpanzees, bonobos, wolves, and dogs, engage in various forms of communication to express their feelings and build relations.[165] Communication can aid navigation by helping animals move through their environment in a purposeful way, e.g. to locate food, avoid enemies, and follow other animals. In bats, this happens through echolocation, i.e. by sending auditory signals and processing the information from the echoes. Bees are another often-discussed case in this respect since they perform a type of dance to indicate to other bees where flowers are located.[166] In regard to self-defense, communication is used to warn others and to assess whether a costly fight can be avoided.[167] Another function of communication is to mark and claim territories used for food and mating. For example, some male birds claim a hedge or part of a meadow by using songs to keep other males away and attract females.[168]

Two competing theories in the study of animal communication are nature theory and nurture theory. Their conflict concerns to what extent animal communication is programmed into the genes as a form of adaptation rather than learned from previous experience as a form of conditioning.[169] To the degree that it is learned, it usually happens through imprinting, i.e. as a form of learning that only occurs in a certain phase and is then mostly irreversible.[170]

Plants, fungi, and bacteria[edit | edit source]

Plant communication refers to plant processes involving the sending and receiving of information.[171] The field studying plant communication is called phytosemiotics.[172] This field poses additional difficulties for researchers since plants are different from humans and other animals in that they lack a central nervous system and have rigid cell walls.[173] These walls restrict movement and usually prevent plants from sending and receiving signals that depend on rapid movement.[174] However, there are some similarities since plants face many of the same challenges as animals. For example, they need to find resources, avoid predators and pathogens, find mates, and ensure that their offspring survive.[175] Many of the evolutionary responses to these challenges are analogous to those in animals but are implemented using different means.[176] One crucial difference is that chemical communication is much more prominent in the plant kingdom in contrast to the importance of visual and auditory communication for animals.[177]

Diagram of the steps of plant communication: a cue is first emitted and later received, leading to a response
Steps of plant communication

In plants, the term behavior is usually not defined in terms of physical movement, as is the case for animals, but as a biochemical response to a stimulus. This response has to be short relative to the plant's lifespan. Communication is a special form of behavior that involves conveying information from a sender to a receiver. It is distinguished from other types of behavior, like defensive reactions and mere sensing.[178] Like in the field of animal communication, plant communication researchers often require as additional criteria that there is some form of response in the receiver and that the communicative behavior is beneficial to sender and receiver.[179] Biologist Richard Karban distinguishes three steps of plant communication: the emission of a cue by a sender, the perception of the cue by a receiver, and the receiver's response.[180] For plant communication, it is not relevant to what extent the emission of a cue is intentional. However, it should be possible for the receiver to ignore the signal. This criterion can be used to distinguish a response to a signal from a defense mechanism against an unwanted change like intense heat.[181]

Plant communication happens in various forms. It includes communication within plants, i.e. within plant cells and between plant cells, between plants of the same or related species, and between plants and non-plant organisms, especially in the root zone.[182] A prominent form of communication is airborne and happens through volatile organic compounds (VOCs). For example, maple trees release VOCs when they are attacked by a herbivore to warn neighboring plants, which then react accordingly by adjusting their defenses.[183] Another form of plant-to-plant communication happens through mycorrhizal fungi. These fungi form underground networks, colloquially referred to as the Wood-Wide Web, and connect the roots of different plants. The plants use the network to send messages to each other, specifically to warn other plants of a pest attack and to help prepare their defenses.[184]

Communication can also be observed for fungi and bacteria. Some fungal species communicate by releasing pheromones into the external environment. For instance, they are used to promote sexual interaction in several aquatic fungal species.[185] One form of communication between bacteria is called quorum sensing. It happens by releasing hormone-like molecules, which other bacteria detect and respond to. This process is used to monitor the environment for other bacteria and to coordinate population-wide responses, for example, by sensing the density of bacteria and regulating gene expression accordingly. Other possible responses include the induction of bioluminescence and the formation of biofilms.[186]

Interspecies[edit | edit source]

Most communication happens between members within a species as intraspecies communication. This is because the purpose of communication is usually some form of cooperation. Cooperation happens mostly within a species while different species are often in conflict with each other by competing over resources.[187] However, there are also some forms of interspecies communication.[188] This occurs especially for symbiotic relations and significantly less for parasitic or predator-prey relations.[189]

Photo of a honey bee on a flower
A honeybee on a Cosmos bipinnatus. Many flowers use vivid colors to signal to insects that they offer food like nectar.

Interspecies communication plays a key role for plants that depend on external agents for reproduction.[190] For example, flowers need insects for pollination and provide resources like nectar and other rewards in return.[191] They use communication to signal their benefits and attract visitors by using distinctive colors and symmetrical shapes to stand out from their surroundings.[192] This form of advertisement is necessary since flowers compete with each other for visitors.[193] Many fruit-bearing plants rely on plant-to-animal communication to disperse their seeds and move them to a favorable location.[194] This happens by providing nutritious fruits to animals. The seeds are eaten together with the fruit and are later excreted at a different location.[195] Communication makes animals aware of where the fruits are and whether they are ripe. For many fruits, this happens through their color: they have an inconspicuous green color until they ripen and take on a new color that stands in visual contrast to the environment.[196] Another example of interspecies communication is found in the ant-plant relation.[197] It concerns, for instance, the selection of seeds by ants for their ant gardens and the pruning of exogenous vegetation as well as plant protection by ants.[198]

Some animal species also engage in interspecies communication, like apes, whales, dolphins, elephants, and dogs.[199] For example, different species of monkeys use common signals to cooperate when threatened by a common predator.[200] Humans engage in interspecies communication when interacting with pets and working animals.[201] For instance, acoustic signals play a central role in communication with dogs. Dogs can learn to react to various commands, like "sit" and "come". They can even be trained to respond to short syntactic combinations, like "bring X" or "put X in a box". They also react to the pitch and frequency of the human voice to detect emotions, dominance, and uncertainty. Dogs use a range of behavioral patterns to convey their emotions to humans, for example, in regard to aggressiveness, fearfulness, and playfulness.[202]

Computer[edit | edit source]

Diagram of computer communication from a personal computer to a server using modems and the public telephone network
Example of computer communication: modems act as transmitter and receiver while the public telephone network is used as a transmission system.[203]

Computer communication concerns the exchange of data between computers and similar devices.[204] For this to be possible, the devices have to be connected through a transmission system that forms a network between them. A transmitter is needed to send messages and a receiver is needed to receive them. A personal computer may use a modem as a transmitter to send information to a server through the public telephone network as the transmission system. The server may use a modem as its receiver.[205] To transmit the data, it has to be converted into an electric signal.[206] Communication channels used for transmission are either analog or digital and are characterized by features like bandwidth and latency.[207]

There are many forms of computer networks. The most commonly discussed ones are LANs and WANs. LAN stands for local area network, which is a computer network within a limited area, usually with a distance of less than one kilometer.[208] This is the case when connecting two computers within a home or an office building. LANs can be set up using a wired connection, like Ethernet, or a wireless connection, like Wi-Fi.[209] WANs, on the other hand, are wide area networks that span large geographical regions, like the internet.[210] Their networks are more complex and may use several intermediate connection nodes to transfer information between endpoints.[211] Further types of computer networks include PANs (personal area networks), CANs (campus area networks), and MANs (metropolitan area networks).[212]

For computer communication to be successful, the involved devices have to follow a common set of conventions governing their exchange. These conventions are known as the communication protocol. They concern various aspects of the exchange, like the format of messages and how to respond to transmission errors. They also cover how the two systems are synchronized, for example, how the receiver identifies the start and end of a signal.[213] Based on the flow of informations, systems are categorized as simplex, half-duplex, and full-duplex. For simplex systems, signals flow only in one direction from the sender to the receiver, like in radio, cable television, and screens displaying arrivals and departures at airports.[214] Half-duplex systems allow two-way exchanges but signals can only flow in one direction at a time, like walkie-talkies and police radios. In the case of full-duplex systems, signals can flow in both directions at the same time, like regular telephone and internet.[215] In either case, it is often important for successful communication that the connection is secure to ensure that the transmitted data reaches only the intended destination and is not intercepted by an unauthorized third party.[216] This can be achieved by using cryptography, which changes the format of the transmitted information to make it unintelligible to potential interceptors.[217]

Human-computer communication is a closely related field that concerns topics like how humans interact with computers and how data in the form of inputs and outputs is exchanged.[218] This happens through a user interface, which includes the hardware used to interact with the computer, like a mouse, a keyboard, and a monitor, as well as the software used in the process.[219] On the software side, most early user interfaces were command-line interfaces in which the user must type a command to interact with the computer.[220] Most modern user interfaces are graphical user interfaces, like Microsoft Windows and macOS, which are usually much easier to use for non-experts. They involve graphical elements through which the user can interact with the computer, commonly using a design concept known as skeumorphism to make a new concept feel familiar and speed up understanding by mimicking the real-world equivalent of the interface object. Examples include the typical computer folder icon and recycle bin used for discarding files.[221] One aim when designing user interfaces is to simplify the interaction with computers. This helps make them more user-friendly and accessible to a wider audience while also increasing productivity.[222]

Communication studies[edit | edit source]

Communication studies, also referred to as communication science, is the academic discipline studying communication. It is closely related to semiotics, with one difference being that communication studies focuses more on technical questions of how messages are sent, received, and processed. Semiotics, on the other hand, tackles more abstract questions in relation to meaning and how signs acquire it.[223] Communication studies covers a wide area overlapping with many other disciplines, such as biology, anthropology, psychology, sociology, linguistics, media studies, and journalism.[224]

Many contributions in the field of communication studies focus on developing models and theories of communication. Models of communication aim to give a simplified overview of the main components involved in communication. Theories of communication try to provide conceptual frameworks to accurately present communication in all its complexity.[225] Some theories focus on communication as a practical art of discourse while others explore the roles of signs, experience, information processing, and the goal of building a social order through coordinated interaction.[226] Communication studies is also interested in the functions and effects of communication. It covers issues like how communication satisfies physiological and psychological needs, helps build relationships, and assists in gathering information about the environment, other individuals, and oneself.[227] A further topic concerns the question of how communication systems change over time and how these changes correlate with other societal changes.[228] A related topic focuses on psychological principles underlying those changes and the effects they have on how people exchange ideas.[229]

Communication was studied as early as Ancient Greece. Early influential theories were created by Plato and Aristotle, who stressed public speaking and the understanding of rhetoric. According to Aristotle, for example, the goal of communication is to persuade the audience.[230] The field of communication studies only became a separate research discipline in the 20th century, especially starting in the 1940s.[231] The development of new communication technologies, such as telephone, radio, newspapers, television, and the internet, has had a big impact on communication and communication studies.[232]

Today, communication studies is a wide discipline. Some works in it try to provide a general characterization of communication in the widest sense. Others attempt to give a precise analysis of one specific form of communication. Communication studies includes many subfields. Some focus on wide topics like interpersonal communication, intrapersonal communication, verbal communication, and non-verbal communication. Others investigate communication within a specific area.[233] Organizational communication concerns communication between members of organizations such as corporations, nonprofits, or small businesses. Central in this regard is the coordination of the behavior of the different members as well as the interaction with customers and the general public.[234] Closely related terms are business communication, corporate communication, and professional communication.[235] The main element of marketing communication is advertising but it also encompasses other communication activities aimed at advancing the organization's objective to its audiences, like public relations.[236] Political communication covers topics like electoral campaigns to influence voters and legislative communication, like letters to a congress or committee documents. Specific emphasis is often given to propaganda and the role of mass media.[237]

Intercultural communication is relevant to both organizational and political communication since they often involve attempts to exchange messages between communicators from different cultural backgrounds.[238] The cultural background affects how messages are formulated and interpreted and can be the cause of misunderstandings.[239] It is also relevant for development communication, which is about the use of communication for assisting in development, like aid given by first-world countries to third-world countries.[240] Health communication concerns communication in the field of healthcare and health promotion efforts. One of its topics is how healthcare providers, like doctors and nurses, should communicate with their patients.[241]

History[edit | edit source]

Communication history studies how communicative processes evolved and interacted with society, culture, and technology.[242] Human communication has a long history and the way people communicate has changed considerably over time. Many of these changes were triggered by the development of new communication technologies and had various effects on how people exchanged ideas.[243] New communication technologies usually require new skills that people need to learn to use them effectively.[244]

In the academic literature, the history of communication is usually divided into ages based on the dominant form of communication in that age. The number of ages and the precise periodization are disputed. They usually include ages for speaking, writing, and print as well as electronic mass communication and the internet.[245] According to communication theorist Marshall Poe, the dominant media for each age can be characterized in relation to several factors. They include the amount of information a medium can store, how long it persists, how much time it takes to transmit it, and how costly it is to use the medium. Poe argues that subsequent ages usually involve some form of improvement of one or more of the factors.[246]

According to some scientific estimates, language developed around 40,000 years ago while others consider it to be much older. Before this development, human communication resembled animal communication and happened through a combination of grunts, cries, gestures, and facial expressions. Language helped early humans to organize themselves and plan ahead more efficiently.[247] In early societies, spoken language was the primary form of communication.[248] Most knowledge was passed on through it, often in the form of stories or wise sayings. This form does not produce stable knowledge since it depends on imperfect human memory. Because of this, many details differ from one telling to the next and are presented differently by distinct storytellers.[249] As people started to settle and form agricultural communities, societies grew and there was an increased need for stable records of ownership of land and commercial transactions. This triggered the invention of writing, which is able to solve many problems that arose from using exclusively oral communication.[250] It is much more efficient at preserving knowledge and passing it on between generations since it does not depend on human memory.[251] Before the invention of writing, certain forms of proto-writing had already developed. Proto-writing encompasses long-lasting visible marks used to store information, like decorations on pottery items, knots in a cord to track goods, or seals to mark property.[252]

Photo of a sales contract inscribed on a clay tablet
Sales contract inscribed on a clay tablet using pre-cuneiform script

Most early written communication happened through pictograms. Pictograms are graphical symbols that convey meaning by visually resembling real-world objects. The use of basic pictographic symbols to represent things like farming produce was common in ancient cultures and began around 9000 BCE. The first complex writing system including pictograms was developed around 3500 BCE by the Sumerians and is called cuneiform.[253] Pictograms are still in use today, like no-smoking signs and the symbols of male and female figures on bathroom doors.[254] A significant disadvantage of pictographic writing systems is that they need a large amount of symbols to refer to all the objects one wants to talk about. This problem was solved by the development of other writing systems. For example, the symbols of alphabetic writing systems do not stand for regular objects. Instead, they relate to the sounds used in spoken language.[255] Other types of early writing systems include logographic and ideographic writing systems.[256] A drawback of many early forms of writing, like the clay tablets used for cuneiform, was that they were not very portable. This made it difficult to transport the texts from one location to another to share information. This changed with the invention of papyrus by the Egyptians around 2500 BCE and was further improved later by the development of parchment and paper.[257]

Until the 1400s, almost all written communication was hand-written, which limited the spread of written media within society since copying texts by hand was costly. The introduction and popularization of mass printing in the middle of the 15th century by Johann Gutenberg resulted in rapid changes. Mass printing quickly increased the circulation of written media and also led to the dissemination of new forms of written documents, like newspapers and pamphlets. One side effect was that the augmented availability of written documents significantly improved the general literacy of the population. This development served as the foundation for revolutions in various fields, including science, politics, and religion.[258]

Scientific discoveries in the 19th and 20th centuries caused many further developments in the history of communication. They include the invention of telegraphs and telephones, which made it even easier and faster to transmit information from one location to another without the need to transport written documents.[259] These communication forms were initially limited to cable connections, which had to be established first. Later developments found ways of wireless transmission using radio signals. They made it possible to reach wide audiences and radio soon became one of the central forms of mass communication.[260] Various innovations in the field of photography enabled the recording of images on film, which led to the development of cinema and television.[261] The reach of wireless communication was further enhanced with the development of satellites, which made it possible to broadcast radio and television signals to stations all over the world. This way, information could be shared almost instantly everywhere around the globe.[262] The development of the internet constitutes a further milestone in the history of communication. It made it easier than ever before for people to exchange ideas, collaborate, and access information from anywhere in the world by using a variety of means, such as websites, e-mail, social media, and video conferences.[263]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

Citations[edit | edit source]

  1. Template:Multiref
  2. Template:Multiref
  3. Template:Multiref
  4. Rosengren 2000, pp. 1–2, 1.1 On communication
  5. Template:Multiref
  6. Template:Multiref
  7. Dance 1970, pp. 201–203
  8. Dance 1970, pp. 207–210
  9. Template:Multiref
  10. Template:Multiref
  11. Template:Multiref
  12. Blackburn 1996, Intention and communication
  13. Dance 1970, pp. 208–209
  14. Munodawafa 2008, pp. 369–370
  15. Dance 1970, p. 209
  16. Template:Multiref
  17. Template:Multiref
  18. Template:Multiref
  19. Template:Multiref
  20. Ruben 2001, pp. 607–608, Models Of Communication
  21. Template:Multiref
  22. Template:Multiref
  23. Fiske 2011a, pp. 24, 30, 2. Other models
  24. Template:Multiref
  25. Template:Multiref
  26. Template:Multiref
  27. Template:Multiref
  28. Template:Multiref
  29. Template:Multiref
  30. Template:Multiref
  31. Template:Multiref
  32. Template:Multiref
  33. Template:Multiref
  34. Template:Multiref
  35. Template:Multiref
  36. Template:Multiref
  37. Template:Multiref
  38. Template:Multiref
  39. Hamilton, Kroll & Creel 2023, p. 46
  40. Template:Multiref
  41. Template:Multiref
  42. Template:Multiref
  43. Template:Multiref
  44. Template:Multiref
  45. Template:Multiref
  46. Template:Multiref
  47. Template:Multiref
  48. Template:Multiref
  49. Template:Multiref
  50. Template:Multiref
  51. Harley 2014, pp. 5–6
  52. Thomason 2006, pp. 342–345, Artificial And Natural Languages
  53. Template:Multiref
  54. Template:Multiref
  55. Template:Multiref
  56. Template:Multiref
  57. Template:Multiref
  58. Danesi 2013a, p. 492
  59. Giri 2009, p. 690
  60. Template:Multiref
  61. Template:Multiref
  62. Håkansson & Westander 2013, p. 107
  63. Template:Multiref
  64. Danesi 2013a, p. 493
  65. Template:Multiref
  66. Template:Multiref
  67. Giri 2009, p. 693
  68. Giri 2009, p. 692
  69. Danesi 2013a, p. 493
  70. Giri 2009, p. 692
  71. Template:Multiref
  72. Template:Multiref
  73. Template:Multiref
  74. Template:Multiref
  75. Giri 2009, pp. 692–693
  76. Template:Multiref
  77. Giri 2009, pp. 693–694
  78. Template:Multiref
  79. Template:Multiref
  80. Template:Multiref
  81. Giri 2009, p. 690
  82. Burgoon, Manusov & Guerrero 2016, pp. 3–4
  83. Template:Multiref
  84. Giri 2009, p. 691
  85. Template:Multiref
  86. Template:Multiref
  87. Giri 2009, p. 690
  88. Template:Multiref
  89. Template:Multiref
  90. McDermott 2009, p. 547
  91. McDermott 2009, pp. 547–548
  92. Template:Multiref
  93. Chandler & Munday 2011, p. 221
  94. UMN staff 2016a, 1.2 The Communication Process
  95. Trenholm & Jensen 2013, pp. 36, 361
  96. McDermott 2009, pp. 548–549
  97. McDermott 2009, p. 549
  98. Template:Multiref
  99. McDermott 2009, p. 546
  100. McDermott 2009, pp. 546–547
  101. Template:Multiref
  102. Template:Multiref
  103. Vocate 2012, p. 196
  104. Template:Multiref
  105. Lantolf 2009, pp. 567–568
  106. Lantolf 2009, pp. 568–569
  107. Template:Multiref
  108. Template:Multiref
  109. Template:Multiref
  110. Template:Multiref
  111. Template:Multiref
  112. Danesi 2013, p. 168
  113. Fiske 2011, p. 20
  114. Template:Multiref
  115. Template:Multiref
  116. Backlund & Morreale 2015, pp. 20–21
  117. McArthur, McArthur & McArthur 2005, pp. 232–233
  118. Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg 2008, p. 25
  119. Template:Multiref
  120. Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg 2008, pp. 17–18
  121. Template:Multiref
  122. Template:Multiref
  123. Backlund & Morreale 2015, p. 23
  124. Spitzberg 2015, p. 241
  125. Template:Multiref
  126. Spitzberg 2015, p. 241
  127. Template:Multiref
  128. Template:Multiref
  129. Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg 2008, p. 26
  130. Backlund & Morreale 2015, pp. 20–22
  131. Template:Multiref
  132. Template:Multiref
  133. Template:Multiref
  134. Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg 2008, p. 25
  135. McArthur, McArthur & McArthur 2005, pp. 232–233
  136. Spitzberg 2015, pp. 238–239
  137. Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg 2008, p. 15
  138. Template:Multiref
  139. Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg 2008, p. 24
  140. Template:Multiref
  141. Template:Multiref
  142. Template:Multiref
  143. Template:Multiref
  144. Template:Multiref
  145. Håkansson & Westander 2013, p. 45
  146. Template:Multiref
  147. Blatrix & Mayer 2010, p. 128
  148. Template:Multiref
  149. Schenk & Seabloom 2010, p. 6
  150. Ruben 2002, pp. 25–26
  151. Chandler & Munday 2011, p. 15
  152. Håkansson & Westander 2013, p. 107
  153. Template:Multiref
  154. Template:Multiref
  155. Template:Multiref
  156. Håkansson & Westander 2013, p. 5
  157. Template:Multiref
  158. Template:Multiref
  159. Template:Multiref
  160. Template:Multiref
  161. Håkansson & Westander 2013, p. 2
  162. Ruben 2002, pp. 26–29
  163. Template:Multiref
  164. Template:Multiref
  165. Håkansson & Westander 2013, p. 3
  166. Ruben 2002, pp. 27–28
  167. Template:Multiref
  168. Ruben 2002, pp. 28–29
  169. Template:Multiref
  170. Håkansson & Westander 2013, pp. 14–15
  171. Karban 2015, pp. 4–5
  172. Sebeok 1991, p. 111
  173. Template:Multiref
  174. Schenk & Seabloom 2010, p. 6
  175. Karban 2015, pp. 1–2
  176. Karban 2015, p. 2
  177. Template:Multiref
  178. Karban 2015, pp. 2–4
  179. Template:Multiref
  180. Karban 2015, p. 7
  181. Karban 2015, p. 45
  182. Baluska et al. 2006, 2. Neurobiological View of Plants and Their Body Plan
  183. Template:Multiref
  184. Gilbert & Johnson 2017, pp. 84, 94
  185. Template:Multiref
  186. Template:Multiref
  187. Berea 2017, p. 56
  188. Template:Multiref
  189. Template:Multiref
  190. Karban 2015, p. 109
  191. Karban 2015, p. 110
  192. Template:Multiref
  193. Karban 2015, p. 111
  194. Karban 2015, p. 122
  195. Karban 2015, pp. 122–124
  196. Karban 2015, pp. 125–126, 128
  197. Template:Multiref
  198. Blatrix & Mayer 2010, p. 127
  199. Berea 2017, pp. 56–57
  200. Berea 2017, p. 61
  201. Template:Multiref
  202. Template:Multiref
  203. Stallings 2014, p. 40
  204. Template:Multiref
  205. Template:Multiref
  206. Stallings 2014, p. 44
  207. Template:Multiref
  208. Template:Multiref
  209. Template:Multiref
  210. Template:Multiref
  211. Template:Multiref
  212. Template:Multiref
  213. Template:Multiref
  214. Hura & Singhal 2001, p. 142
  215. Hura & Singhal 2001, p. 143
  216. Stallings 2014, pp. 41–42
  217. Template:Multiref
  218. Template:Multiref
  219. Template:Multiref
  220. Rao, Wang & Zhou 1996, p. 57
  221. Template:Multiref
  222. Twidale 2002, pp. 411–413
  223. Danesi 2000, pp. 58–59
  224. Template:Multiref
  225. Template:Multiref
  226. Cobley & Schulz 2013, pp. 31, 41–42
  227. Template:Multiref
  228. Danesi 2013, p. 184
  229. Danesi 2013, pp. 184–185
  230. Ruben 2002a, p. 155
  231. Template:Multiref
  232. Template:Multiref
  233. Template:Multiref
  234. Template:Multiref
  235. Template:Multiref
  236. Template:Multiref
  237. McClelland 2008, Communication, Political
  238. Hillstrom, Northern Lights & Magee, ECDI 2006, pp. 609–610, Intercultural communication
  239. Template:Multiref
  240. Template:Multiref
  241. Template:Multiref
  242. Template:Multiref
  243. Template:Multiref
  244. Template:Multiref
  245. Template:Multiref
  246. Template:Multiref
  247. Template:Multiref
  248. Template:Multiref
  249. Danesi 2013, p. 168
  250. Template:Multiref
  251. Template:Multiref
  252. Template:Multiref
  253. Template:Multiref
  254. Danesi 2013, pp. 168–169
  255. Template:Multiref
  256. Template:Multiref
  257. Template:Multiref
  258. Template:Multiref
  259. Template:Multiref
  260. Template:Multiref
  261. Template:Multiref
  262. Steinberg 1995, p. 7
  263. Template:Multiref

Sources[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Communication studies Template:Human intelligence topics Template:Nonverbal communication Template:Informatics