Created by Ajay Kumar
Last edited March 26, 2026
m Removing protection template from an unprotected page
small improved content as per guidelines additionally and improved wording
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Roman Empire during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages}}
{{Short description|Continuation of the Roman Empire (330–1453)}}
{{Redirect|Byzantine}}
{{Redirect|Byzantine}}
 
{{Protection padlock|small=yes}}
<noinclude>
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2023}}
{{Featured article}}
{{Use British English|date=July 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}}
{{Infobox former country
{{EngvarB|date=July 2019}}
{{very long|date=July 2023}}
{{Infobox country
| native_name            = &nbsp;{{Native name|grc|Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων}}{{Ref|name|a}}<br />{{Native name|la|Imperium Romanum}}
| conventional_long_name = Byzantine Empire
| conventional_long_name = Byzantine Empire
| common_name            = Byzantine Empire
| life_span              = 330–1453
| status                = Empire
| life_span              = 330/395–1453{{Ref|lifespan|b}}
| image_map              = Justinian555AD.png
| image_map              = Justinian555AD.png
| image_map_caption      = The empire in 555 under [[Justinian the Great]], at its greatest extent since the fall of the [[Western Roman Empire]] (its [[vassal state|vassals]] in pink)
| image_map_size        = 320px
| image_map2            = 4KBYZ.gif
| image_map_caption      = The empire in 555 under [[Justinian I]], its greatest extent since the fall of the [[Western Roman Empire]], [[vassal state|vassals]] shaded in pink
| image_map2_caption    = The territorial evolution of the Eastern Roman Empire under each imperial dynasty until its fall in 1453
| capital                = [[Constantinople]]
| capital                = [[Constantinople]] (modern-day [[Istanbul]]){{Ref|capital|c}}
| common_languages     = [[Medieval&nbsp;Greek|Greek]]
| largest_city          =
| national_languages    =  
| common_languages       = {{Plainlist|
| religion              = [[Christianity as the Roman state religion|Christianity]] ([[State religion|official]])
* [[Medieval&nbsp;Greek|Greek]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Byzantine-Greek-language|title=Byzantine Greek language|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|access-date=21 August 2021|archive-date=17 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210717175804/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Byzantine-Greek-language|url-status=live}}</ref>
| government_type        = [[Absolute monarchy]]
* [[Late Latin|Latin]]
* [[Languages of the Roman Empire|Regional{{\}}local languages]]
}}
| government_type        = [[Monarchy]]
| religion               = {{Plainlist|
* [[Nicene Christianity]] (official)
* [[Religion in ancient Rome|Roman polytheism]] (until AD 380)
* [[Ancient Greek religion|Greek polytheism]] (until AD 380)
}}
| title_leader          = [[List of Byzantine emperors|Notable emperors]]
| title_leader          = [[List of Byzantine emperors|Notable emperors]]
| leader1                = [[Constantine the Great|Constantine I]] (first)
| leader1                = [[Constantine the Great|Constantine I]]
| year_leader1          = 306–337
| year_leader1          = 306–337
| leader2                = [[Theodosius II]]
| leader2                = [[Theodosius I]]
| year_leader2          = 408–450
| year_leader2          = 379–395
| leader3                = [[Zeno (emperor)|Zeno]]
| leader3                = [[Theodosius II]]
| year_leader3          = 474–475, 476–491
| year_leader3          = 408–450
| leader4                = [[Justinian I]]
| leader4                = [[Justinian I]]
| year_leader4          = 527–565
| year_leader4          = 527–565
| leader5                = [[Maurice (emperor)|Maurice]]
| leader5                = [[Heraclius]]
| year_leader5          = 582–602
| year_leader5          = 610–641
| leader6                = [[Heraclius]]
| leader6                = [[Leo III the Isaurian|Leo III]]
| year_leader6          = 610–641
| year_leader6          = 717–741
| leader7                = [[Leo III the Isaurian|Leo III]]
| leader7                = [[Nikephoros II Phokas|Nikephoros II]]
| year_leader7          = 717–741
| year_leader7          = 963–969
| leader8                = [[Irene of Athens|Irene]]
| leader8                = [[John I Tzimiskes|John I]]
| year_leader8          = 797–802
| year_leader8          = 969–976
| leader9                = [[Basil I]]
| leader9                = [[Basil II]]
| year_leader9          = 867–886
| year_leader9          = 976–1025
| leader10              = [[Basil II]]
| leader10              = [[Alexios I Komnenos|Alexios I]]
| year_leader10          = 976–1025
| year_leader10          = 1081–1118
| leader11              = [[Alexios I Komnenos|Alexios I]]
| leader11              = [[John II Komnenos|John II]]
| year_leader11          = 1081–1118
| year_leader11          = 1118–1143
| leader12              = [[Manuel I Komnenos|Manuel I]]
| leader12              = [[Manuel I Komnenos|Manuel I]]
| year_leader12          = 1143–1180
| year_leader12          = 1143–1180
Line 59: Line 44:
| leader14              = [[Constantine XI Palaiologos|Constantine XI]]
| leader14              = [[Constantine XI Palaiologos|Constantine XI]]
| year_leader14          = 1449–1453
| year_leader14          = 1449–1453
| era                    = [[Late Antiquity]] to [[Late&nbsp;Middle&nbsp;Ages]]
| era                    = [[Late antiquity]] to {{nwr|[[Late Middle Ages]]}}
| event_start            = [[Tetrarchy#Creation|First East–West division]] of the Roman Empire
| year_start            = 1 April 286
| event1                = [[Constantinople#History|Inauguration of Constantinople]]
| date_event1            = 11 May 330
| event2                = Final East–West division after the death&nbsp;of&nbsp;[[Theodosius&nbsp;I]]
| date_event2            = 17 January 395
| event3                = [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|Fall of the West]]; deposition of [[Romulus Augustulus|Romulus]]
| date_event3            = 4 September 476
| event4                = Assassination of<br/>[[Julius Nepos]]
| date_event4            = 9 May 480
| event5                = [[Early&nbsp;Muslim&nbsp;conquests]]; start of the [[Byzantine Dark Ages|Dark Ages]]
| date_event5            = 634–750
| event6                = [[Battle of Manzikert]]; loss of [[Anatolia]] due to following civil war
| date_event6            = 26 August 1071
| event7                = [[Sack of Constantinople]] by Catholic crusaders
| date_event7            = 12 April 1204
| event8                = [[Reconquest of Constantinople]]
| date_event8            = 25 July 1261
| event9                = [[Fall of Constantinople]]
| date_event9            = 29 May 1453
| event10                = [[Despotate of the Morea|Fall of Morea]]
| date_event10          = 29 May 1460
| event_post            = [[Siege of Trebizond (1461)|Fall of Trebizond]]
| date_post              = 15 August 1461
| stat_year1            = 457
| stat_year1            = 457
| stat_pop1              = 16,000,000{{Ref|population|f}}
| ref_pop1              = {{sfn|Treadgold|1997|p=137}}
<!--
| stat_pop1              = 16,000,000
| stat_year2              = 555–450
| stat_area1            = 2,350,000
| stat_area2              = 2,700,000 - 2,800,000 <ref>Turchin, Peter; Adams, Jonathan M.; Hall, Thomas D. (December 2006). "East-West Orientation of Historical Empires" (PDF). Journal of World-Systems Research. 12 (2): 222–223. ISSN 1076-156X. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 July 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.</ref><ref>Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 121–122, 124–129, 132–133. {{Doi|10.2307/1170959}}. JSTOR 1170959.</ref>
| stat_year2            = 565
-->| stat_year2            = 565
| ref_pop2              = {{sfn|Treadgold|1997|p=278}}
| stat_area2            =  
| stat_pop2              = 20,000,000
| stat_pop2              = 26,000,000
| stat_area2            = 3,400,000
| stat_year3            = 775
| stat_year3            = 775
| stat_area3            =  
| ref_pop3              = {{sfn|Treadgold|1997|p=236}}
| stat_pop3              = 7,000,000
| stat_pop3              = 7,000,000
| stat_area3            = 880,000
| stat_year4            = 1025
| stat_year4            = 1025
| stat_area4            =
| stat_pop4              = 12,000,000
| stat_pop4              = 12,000,000
| stat_area4            = 1,675,000
| ref_pop4              = {{sfn|Treadgold|1997|p=570}}
| stat_year5            = 1320
| stat_year5            = 1320
| stat_area5            =  
| ref_pop5              = {{sfn|Treadgold|1997|p=236}}
| stat_pop5              = 2,000,000
| stat_pop5              = 2,000,000
| currency              = [[Solidus (coin)|Solidus]], [[denarius]] and [[hyperpyron]]<!--
| currency              = [[Solidus (coin)|Solidus]], [[follis]], and [[hyperpyron]]
| p1                    = Roman Empire | p2                    = Diocese of Dacia{{!}}'''∟'''Diocese of Dacia
| p3                    = Diocese of Macedonia{{!}}'''∟'''Diocese of Macedonia
| p4                    = Praetorian prefecture of the East{{!}}'''∟'''Praetorian prefecture of the East
| s1                    = Ottoman Empire-->
| footnote_a            = {{Note|name||{{Lang|grc|Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων}} may be transliterated in Latin as ''{{Transliteration|grc|Basileia Rhōmaiōn}}'', literally meaning "Monarchy of the Romans", but commonly rendered "Empire of the Romans".}}
| footnote_b            = {{Note|lifespan||Between 1204 and 1261 there was an [[interregnum]] when the [[Latin Empire]] took control of Constantinople, causing the Byzantine Empire itself to be divided into the [[Empire of Nicaea]], the [[Empire of Trebizond]], and the [[Despotate of Epirus]]. The Empire of Nicaea is traditionally considered by historians to be the legitimate continuation of the Byzantine Empire because it managed to retake Constantinople.<ref>{{Harvnb|Treadgold|1997|p=734}}</ref>}}
| footnote_c            = {{Note|capital||Constantinople became the capital of the (united) empire in 330. In 395, the empire was permanently divided in two halves after the death of [[Theodosius I]].}}
| footnote_d            = {{Note|religion1||Tolerated after the Edicts of [[Edict of Serdica|Serdica]] (311) and [[Edict of Milan|Milan]] (313); [[State church of the Roman Empire|state religion]] after 380.}}
| footnote_e            = {{Note|religion2||Following the [[East–West Schism]] of 1054.}}
| footnote_f            = {{Note|population||See [[Population of the Byzantine Empire]] for more detailed figures taken provided by McEvedy and Jones (1978) ''Atlas of World Population History'', as well as Angeliki E. Laiou (2002), ''The Economic History of Byzantium''.}}
| demonym                = [[Byzantine Greeks|Rhōmaîoi]]
| area_km2              =
| area_rank              =
| GDP_PPP                =
| GDP_PPP_year          =
| HDI                    =
| HDI_year              =
}}
}}
{{History of the Byzantine Empire sidebar}}


The '''Byzantine Empire''',{{NoteTag|{{IPAc-en|b|I|"|z|{|n|%|t|aI|n|,_|b|aI|"|z|{|n|-|,_|"|b|I|z|@|n|-|,_|-|%|t|i:|n|,_|-|%|t|I|n}}<br/>{{respell|bih|ZAN|tyne|,_|by|-|,_|BIZ|ən|-|,_|-|teen|,_|-|tin}}<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Chambers Dictionary|publisher=Chambers|year=2003|isbn=978-0-550-10105-1|edition=9th|chapter=Byzantine}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Collins English Dictionary|publisher=HarperCollins|year=2018|isbn=978-0-008-28437-4|edition=13th|chapter=Byzantine}}</ref>}} also referred to as the '''Eastern Roman Empire''', was the continuation of the [[Roman Empire]] primarily in its eastern provinces during [[Late Antiquity]] and the [[Middle Ages]], when its capital city was [[Constantinople]]. It survived the [[fall of the Western Roman Empire]] in the 5th century AD and continued to exist until the [[fall of Constantinople]] to the [[Ottoman Empire]] in 1453. During most of its existence, the empire remained the most powerful economic, cultural, and military force in the [[Mediterranean world]]. Its citizens continued to refer to their empire as the Roman Empire and to themselves as Romans{{NoteTag|{{Lang-gkm|Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων|Basileía Rhōmaíōn}} (Roman Empire); {{Lang-gkm|Ῥωμανία|Rhōmanía}} (Romania); {{Lang-gkm|Ῥωμαῖοι|Rhōmaîoi}} (Romans)}}—a term which [[Ottoman Greeks|Greeks]] continued to use for themselves into Ottoman times. Modern historians distinguish the Byzantine Empire from the earlier Roman Empire due to the imperial seat moving from Rome to [[Names of Istanbul|Byzantium]], the [[Christianity as the Roman state religion|empire's integration of Christianity]], and the predominance of [[Medieval Greek|Greek]] instead of [[Latin]].{{sfnm|1a1=Millar|1y=2006|1pp=2, 15|2a1=James|2y=2010|2p=5|3a1=Freeman|3y=1999|3pp=431, 435–37, 459–62|4a1=Baynes|4a2=Moss|4y=1948|4p=xx|5a1=Ostrogorsky|5y=1969|5p=27|6a1=Kaldellis|6y=2007|6pp=2–3|7a1=Kazhdan|7a2=Constable|7y=1982|7p=12|8a1=Norwich|8y=1998|8p=383}}
The '''Byzantine Empire''', also known as the '''Eastern Roman Empire''', was the continuation of the [[Roman Empire]] centred on [[Constantinople]] during [[late antiquity]] and the [[Middle Ages]]. Having survived [[History of the Roman Empire|the events]] that caused the [[fall of the Western Roman Empire]] in the 5th century{{Nbsp}}AD, it endured until the [[fall of Constantinople]] to the [[Ottoman Empire]] in 1453. The term 'Byzantine Empire' was coined only after its demise; its citizens used the term 'Roman Empire' and called themselves '[[Rhomaioi (endonym)|Romans]]'.{{Efn|{{Langx|grc-x-medieval|Ῥωμαῖοι|Rhōmaîoi}}. Due to the imperial seat's move to [[Byzantium]], the [[Christianity as the Roman state religion|adoption of state Christianity]], and the predominance of [[Medieval Greek|Greek]] instead of [[Latin]], most historians make a distinction between the earlier ''Roman Empire'' and the later ''Byzantine Empire''.{{sfnm|Millar|2006|1pp=2, 15|Kaldellis|2007|2pp=2–3}}}}


During the high period of the Roman Empire known as the [[Pax Romana]], the western parts of the empire went through [[Romanization (cultural)|Latinization]], while the eastern parts of the empire maintained to a large degree their [[Hellenistic culture]]. Several events from the 4th to 6th centuries mark the period of transition during which the Roman Empire's [[Greek East and Latin West]] diverged. [[Constantine the Great|Constantine I]] ({{Reign|324|337}}) reorganised the empire, made Constantinople the capital, and legalised [[Christianity]]. Under [[Theodosius I]] ({{Reign|379|395}}), Christianity became the [[state religion]], and other religious practices [[Persecution of pagans under Theodosius I|were proscribed]]. In the reign of [[Heraclius]] ({{Reign|610|641}}), the empire's military and administration were restructured and Greek was gradually adopted for official use in place of Latin.
During the early centuries of the Roman Empire, the western provinces were [[Romanization (cultural)|Latinised]], but the eastern parts kept their [[Hellenistic culture]]. [[Constantine the Great|Constantine&nbsp;I]] ({{Reign|324|337}}) legalised [[Christianity]] and moved the capital to Constantinople. [[Theodosius&nbsp;I]] ({{Reign|379|395|lk=no}}) made Christianity the [[state religion]] and Greek gradually replaced Latin for official use. The empire adopted a defensive strategy and, throughout its remaining history, experienced recurring cycles of decline and recovery.


The borders of the empire fluctuated through several cycles of decline and recovery. During the reign of [[Justinian I]] ({{Reign|527|565}}), the empire reached its greatest extent after the fall of the west, reconquering much of the historically Roman western [[Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean coast]], including [[Exarchate of Africa|Africa]], [[Italy]], and [[Rome]], which it held for two more centuries. The [[Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628]] exhausted the empire's resources, and during the [[early Muslim conquests]] of the 7th century, it lost its richest provinces—[[Roman Egypt|Egypt]] and [[Roman Syria|Syria]]—to the [[Rashidun Caliphate]]. It then lost Africa to the [[Umayyad dynasty|Umayyads]] in 698, before the empire was stabilized by the [[Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty|Isaurian]] dynasty.
The Byzantine Empire reached its greatest extent under the reign of [[Justinian I]] ({{Reign|527|565|lk=no}}), who briefly reconquered much of Italy and the western [[Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean coast]]. A [[Plague of Justinian|plague began]] around 541, and a [[Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628|prolonged warfare with Persia]] placed fiscal and military strain on the empire, contributing to political and strategic challenges in the decades that followed. In the 630s and 640s the [[early Muslim conquests|Arab conquests]] defeated Byzantine field armies in [[Roman Syria|Syria]] and [[Roman Egypt|Egypt]], resulting in the permanent loss of those provinces to the [[Rashidun Caliphate]]. In 698, Africa [[Battle of Carthage (698)|was lost]] to the [[Umayyad Caliphate]], but the empire stabilised under the [[Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty|Isaurian dynasty]]. It expanded once more under the [[Macedonian dynasty]], experiencing [[Macedonian Renaissance|a two-century-long renaissance]]. Thereafter, periods of civil war and [[Seljuk dynasty|Seljuk]] incursion resulted in the loss of most of [[Anatolia|Asia Minor]]. The empire recovered during the [[Komnenian restoration]], and Constantinople remained the largest and wealthiest city in Europe until the 13th century.


During the [[Macedonian dynasty]] (9th–11th centuries), the empire expanded again and experienced the two-century-long [[Macedonian Renaissance]], which came to an end with the defeat by the [[Seljuk dynasty|Seljuk Turks]] at the [[Battle of Manzikert]] in 1071. Civil wars and the ensuing Seljuk invasion led to the loss of most of [[Anatolia|Asia Minor]]. The empire recovered during the [[Komnenian restoration]], and up until the Fourth Crusade, Constantinople was the largest and wealthiest city in Europe.
The empire was largely dismantled in 1204, following the [[sack of Constantinople]] during the [[Fourth Crusade]]; its former territories [[Partitio terrarum imperii Romaniae|were then divided]] into competing Greek [[rump state]]s and [[Frankokratia|Latin realms]]. Despite the eventual [[Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty|recovery of Constantinople]] in 1261, the reconstituted empire wielded only regional power during its final two centuries. Its remaining territories were progressively annexed by the Ottomans in [[Byzantine–Ottoman wars|a series of wars]] fought in the 14th and 15th centuries. The fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453 brought the empire to an end.
 
The empire was first dissolved during the [[Fourth Crusade]] in 1204, when Constantinople was [[Sack of Constantinople|sacked]] by the Latins and the territories that the empire formerly governed [[Partitio terrarum imperii Romaniae|were divided]] into competing Byzantine Greek and [[Frankokratia|Latin realms]]. Despite the eventual [[Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty|recovery of Constantinople]] in 1261, the Byzantine Empire remained a mere regional power for the final two centuries of its existence. Its remaining territories were progressively annexed by the Ottomans in the [[Byzantine–Ottoman wars]] over the 14th and 15th centuries.
 
The fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in 1453 marked the end of the Byzantine Empire. Refugees fleeing the city after its capture would settle in Italy and other parts of Europe, helping to ignite the [[Renaissance]]. The [[Empire of Trebizond]] was conquered eight years later when its eponymous capital surrendered to Ottoman forces after it was [[Siege of Trebizond (1461)|besieged in 1461]]. The fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Ottomans is sometimes used to mark the end of the Middle Ages and the start of the [[early modern period]].


== Nomenclature ==
== Nomenclature ==
{{See also|Names of the Greeks}}
{{See also|Names of the Greeks}}
The adjective "Byzantine" is derived from ''Byzantion'', latinized as ''Byzantium'', which was the name of the existing Greek settlement where Constantine I chose to locate his new capital of Constantinople.<ref>{{Harvnb|Mango|2007|p=1}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Gregory|2010|p=i}}</ref> Initially, "Byzantine" referred to the inhabitants of Constantinople.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Theodoropoulos |first=Panagiotis |date=April 2021 |title=Did the Byzantines call themselves Byzantines? Elements of Eastern Roman identity in the imperial discourse of the seventh century |journal=Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies |language=en |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=25–41 |doi=10.1017/byz.2020.28 |s2cid=232344683 |issn=0307-0131|doi-access=free }}</ref> It was only following the demise of the empire in the 15th century that [[Laonikos Chalkokondyles]] first used the word "Byzantine" to describe the state.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Kaldellis|first=Anthony|title=The Invention of Byzantium in Early Modern Europe|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=2022|isbn=978-0-88402-484-2|editor-last=Ransohoff|editor-first=Jake|pages=349–367|language=English|chapter=From "Empire of the Greeks" to "Byzantium"|editor-last2=Aschenbrenner|editor-first2=Nathanael}}</ref> [[Hieronymus Wolf]]'s ''Historiæ Byzantinæ'', which includes Chalkokondyles, marks the start of Byzantine studies.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Asaph |last=Ben-Tov |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/929272646 |title=Lutheran humanists and Greek antiquity Melanchthonian scholarship between universal history and pedagogy |date=2009 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-474-4395-7 |pages=106–8 |oclc=929272646}} as cited in {{Cite book |last=Clark |first=Frederic |title=The Invention of Byzantium in Early Modern Europe |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-88402-484-2 |editor-last=Ransohoff |editor-first=Jake |pages=333 |language=English |chapter=From the rise of Constantine to the fall of Constantinople |editor-last2=Aschenbrenner |editor-first2=Nathanael}}; {{Cite book|last=Kaldellis|first=Anthony|title=The Invention of Byzantium in Early Modern Europe|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=2022|isbn=978-0-88402-484-2|editor-last=Ransohoff|editor-first=Jake|pages=351, 353|language=English|chapter=From "Empire of the Greeks" to "Byzantium"|editor-last2=Aschenbrenner|editor-first2=Nathanael}}; {{Cite book|last=Rosser|first=John H.|date=2012|title=Historical Dictionary of Byzantium|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AYpqikYr3Q8C|page=2|isbn=978-0-8108-7567-8|publisher=[[Scarecrow Press]]|access-date=21 April 2023|archive-date=9 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220409130541/https://books.google.com/books?id=AYpqikYr3Q8C|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Charles du Fresne, sieur du Cange|Du Cange]], [[Montesquieu]] and [[George Finlay|Finlay]] popularised the term through their works.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Vasiliev |first=Alexander |title=History of the Byzantine Empire, 324–1453, Volume I |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |year=1958 |pages=13}}</ref> It was not until the 19th century that the 8th-century term "Empire of the Greeks" was replaced with the modern convention of the "Byzantine Empire".<ref>{{Harvnb|Rosser|2011|p=1}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Kaldellis|first=Anthony|title=The Invention of Byzantium in Early Modern Europe|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=2022|isbn=978-0-88402-484-2|editor-last=Ransohoff|editor-first=Jake|pages=366–367|language=English|chapter=From "Empire of the Greeks" to "Byzantium"|editor-last2=Aschenbrenner|editor-first2=Nathanael|quote=The Crimean War had a profound—and unrecognized—impact by forging a new distinction between "Byzantine/Byzantium" and "Greek/Greece," in a context in which the "Empire of the Greeks" had become a politically toxic concept to the Great Powers of Europe. In response, European intellectuals increasingly began to lean on the conceptually adjacent and neutral term Byzantium in order to create a semantic bulwark between the acceptable national aspirations of the new Greek state, on the one hand, and its dangerous imperial fantasies and its (perceived) Russian patrons, on the other.}}</ref>


The Byzantine Empire was known to its inhabitants as the "Roman Empire" or the "Empire of the Romans", Romania,{{NoteTag|"Romania" was a popular name of the empire used mainly unofficially, which meant "land of the Romans".<ref>{{Harvnb|Fossier|Sondheimer|1997|p=104}}.</ref> After 1081, it occasionally appears in official Byzantine documents as well. In 1204, the leaders of the [[Fourth Crusade]] gave the name ''Romania'' to their newly founded [[Latin Empire]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Wolff|1948|pp=5–7, 33–34}}.</ref> The term does not refer to modern [[Romania]].}} the [[Roman Republic]],{{NoteTag|Coins of Eastern Roman emperor Leo II (reigned in 474 AD) describe him as the 'Savior of the Republic', as, in theory, Rome was still the same republic as it was 500 years prior, though in practice almost all republican institutions of Rome had either been abolished or lost power by this period.}}<ref>{{Cite web |title=File:Leo2-coin.jpg - Wikimedia Commons |url=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Leo2-coin.jpg |access-date=2023-08-22 |website=commons.wikimedia.org |language=en}}</ref> or in Greek "Rhōmais".<ref>{{Harvnb|Cinnamus|1976|p=240}}.</ref> The inhabitants called themselves ''Romaioi,'' and even as late as the 19th century Greeks typically referred to [[Modern Greek]] as ''Romaiika''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|loc="Introduction", p. xiii}}: "The Byzantines did not call themselves Byzantines, but ''Romaioi''–Romans. They were well aware of their role as heirs of the Roman Empire, which for many centuries had united under a single government the whole Mediterranean world and much that was outside it."</ref> After 1204, when the Byzantine Empire consisted purely of its Hellenic provinces, the term [[Names of the Greeks|'Hellenes']] was increasingly used instead.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Nicol |first=Donald M. |date=30 December 1967 |title=The Byzantine View of Western Europe |url=https://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/11101 |journal=Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies |language=en |volume=8 |issue=4 |page=318 |issn=2159-3159 |access-date=10 September 2018 |archive-date=30 April 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180430125324/http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/11101 |url-status=live }}</ref>
The empire's inhabitants, generally known as [[Demography of the Byzantine Empire|Byzantines]], regarded themselves as [[Roman people#Survival of the Roman Empire in the east|Romans]] (in Greek, {{Lang|grc|Ῥωμαῖοι}} or {{transliteration|grc|[[Romaioi]]}}).{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2022a|1pp=351|2a1=Aschenbrenner|2a2=Ransohoff|2y=2022a|2p=1}} Similarly, their Islamic contemporaries called their empire the "land of the Romans" ({{transliteration|ar|Bilād al-Rūm}}).{{sfn|Aschenbrenner|Ransohoff|2022a|p=1}} After 800 AD, Western Europe called them "Greeks" ({{lang|la|Graeci}}), as the Papacy and medieval German emperors regarded themselves as the true inheritors of Roman identity.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=2|2a1=Aschenbrenner|2a2=Ransohoff|2y=2022a|2p=2}} The adjective "Byzantine", derived from [[Byzantium|{{transliteration|grc|Byzantion}}]] ({{lang|la|Byzantium}} in Latin), the name of the Greek settlement [[Constantinople]] was established on, was only used to describe the inhabitants of the city; it did not refer to the empire, called {{transliteration|grc|Rhomanía}} ({{Lang|grc|Ῥωμανία}} or "Romanland") by its citizens.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2022a|1pp=349, 351|2a1=Cormack|2a2=Haldon|2a3=Jeffreys|2y=2008|2p=4}}


From the 6th century,{{NoteTag|One of the earliest references to the eastern empire as "Greeks" comes from Bishop [[Avitus of Vienne]] who wrote, in the context of the Frankish king Clovis I's baptism; "Let Greece, to be sure, rejoice in having an orthodox ruler, but she is no longer the only one to deserve such a great gift".{{Sfn|Pohl|2018|p=25}}}} the empire's western and northern contemporaries began to identify the empire with its increasingly predominant [[Byzantine Greeks|Greek element]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Ahrweiler|Laiou|1998|p=vii}}; {{Harvnb|Davies|1996|p=245}}; {{Harvnb|Gross|1999|p=45}}; {{Harvnb|Lapidge|Blair|Keynes|1998|p=79}}; {{Harvnb|Millar|2006|pages=2, 15}}; {{Harvnb|Moravcsik|1970|pp=11–12}}; {{Harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1969|pp=28, 146}}; {{Harvnb|Browning|1983|p=113}}.</ref>
Following the empire's fall, [[early modern]] scholars referred to it by many names, including the "Eastern Empire", the "Low Empire",  the "Late Empire", the "Empire of the Greeks", "Empire of Constantinople", and "Roman Empire".{{sfn|Aschenbrenner|Ransohoff|2022a|p=2}} The increasing use of "Byzantine" and "Byzantine Empire" may have started with [[Theodore Metochites]]{{sfn|Magdalino|2025|pp=41-43}} or [[Laonikos Chalkokondyles]] whose work was widely propagated by [[Hieronymus Wolf]].{{sfn|Kaldellis|2022a|p=352}} "Byzantine" was used adjectivally alongside terms such as "Empire of the Greeks" until the 19th century.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2022a|pp=352, 355, 357}} It is now the primary term, used to refer to all aspects of the empire; a minority of modern historians believe it should not be used because it was originally a prejudicial and inaccurate term.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=2–3|2a1=Cormack|2a2=Haldon|2a3=Jeffreys|2y=2008|2p=4|3a1=Stouraitis|3y=2022b|3pp=20, 29, 31, 33-36|Treadgold|2025|4pp=xiii–xiv}}
Starting with [[Charlemagne]]'s ''[[Libri Carolini]]'' in the 790s, the Franks used the term "Empire of the Greeks" (Latin: ''Imperium Graecorum'') in order to undercut the Byzantine claim to be the continuation of the Roman Empire.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=O'Brien |first=Conor |date=June 2018 |title=Empire, Ethnic Election and Exegesis in the ''Opus Caroli (Libri Carolini)'' |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-church-history/article/abs/empire-ethnic-election-and-exegesis-in-the-opus-caroli-libri-carolini/4CF0C3448FAE428A5728A09E11A589C6 |journal=Studies in Church History |language=en |volume=54 |pages=96–108 |doi=10.1017/stc.2017.6 |s2cid=204470696 |issn=0424-2084}}</ref>
 
In the Islamic world, the Roman Empire was called ''[[Rum (endonym)|Rûm]]''.<ref>{{Harvnb|Tarasov|Milner-Gulland|2004|p=121}}; {{Harvnb|El-Cheikh|2004|p=22}}</ref> The name [[Rum millet|millet-i Rûm]], or "''Roman nation,''" was used by the Ottomans until the 20th century to refer to the former subjects of the Byzantine Empire, which were the [[Orthodoxy#Christianity|Orthodox Christian]] community within Ottoman realms.


== History ==
== History ==
{{Main|History of the Byzantine Empire}}
{{Main|History of the Byzantine Empire}}


=== Early Byzantine History ===
===<span class="anchor" id="Definition, terminology and starting date"></span>Start date===
The following subchapters describe the transition from the pagan, multicultural Roman Empire ruled from Rome, to the Byzantine Empire, a continuation of the Roman Empire with Latin-inspired administration but culturally predominantly Greek and ruled from Constantinople.
Given the significant overlap in historiographical [[periodization|periodisation]]s of "[[Later Roman Empire|Late Roman history]]", "[[late antiquity]]", and "Byzantine history", there is no consensus on a foundation date for the Byzantine Empire. Scholarship with links to Greece or [[Eastern Orthodoxy]] has customarily placed it in the early 300s.{{sfn|Cameron|2002|pp=190–191}} The growth of the study of "late antiquity" has led to some historians setting a start date in the seventh or eighth centuries.{{sfnm|Cameron|2002|1pp=166, 191|Kaldellis|2015|Howard-Johnston|2024|3p=7}} Others believe a "new empire" began during changes {{circa|300}}{{Nbsp}}AD.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=3, 34}} Geoffrey Greatrex believes that it is impossible to precisely date the foundation of the Byzantine Empire.{{sfn|Greatrex|2008|p=232}}
 
==== Early history of the Greek-Roman east ====
{{More citations needed|date=July 2023}}
[[File:Diadochi LA.svg|thumb|left|220px|Kingdoms of the [[Diadochi]] c.{{nbsp}}301{{nbsp}}BC, after the [[Battle of Ipsus]]]]
 
During the fourth century BC, [[Alexander the Great]] conquered the [[Achaemenid Empire]] which brought huge swathes of land from the eastern part of [[Mediterranean Basin]] all the way to the [[Indus river]] under Greek influence. When Alexander died in 323 BC, much of the land his [[Macedonian Empire]] had conquered was split into successor kingdoms known as the "[[Diadochi]]", that almost immediately entered into wars against each other known as the [[Diadochi wars]]. These Diadochi kingdoms went through different degrees of [[Hellenisation]] over the centuries and created a [[Hellenistic period|Hellenistic world]] across the eastern Mediterranean basin. During the [[4th century BC]], the [[Roman Republic]] was a city-state in the Italian region of [[Latium]] that, through wars and treaties, expanded its influence across the Italian peninsula. At the start of the [[3rd century BC]], Rome had emerged victorious from the [[Samnite wars]] and was at that point the dominant [[hegemon]] of the peninsula, though Rome had yet to be challenged by another great power. This changed with first the [[Pyrrhic war]] that saw the Greek [[Epirus (ancient state)|Kingdom of Epirus]] intervening in a war against Rome to protect the Greek city-states of southern Italy. Later, Rome clashed with Carthage in a series of wars known as the [[Punic wars]] from 264 BC onward, which in the [[Second Punic War]] saw Macedon entering the conflict on the side of Carthage. When the Roman Republic brought the Punic Wars to a close in 146 BC with the [[Siege of Carthage (Third Punic War)|sack of Carthage]], it also brought half a century of [[Roman-Greek wars]] that was running parallel to the Punic Wars to a close with the [[Battle of Corinth (146 BC)|Sack of Corinth]].
 
[[File:Roman Republic.gif|thumb|left|Rome from the creation of the republic to the rule of the first emperor Augustus]]
 
By the end of the Roman-Greek Wars, Rome had conquered and incorporated Macedonia, parts of Thrace, and the rest of Greece into the provinces [[Macedonia (Roman province)|Macedonia]] and [[Achaia (Roman province)|Achaia]] under the direct rule of the Rome. By 133 BC, the king of [[Pergamon]] [[Attalus III]] died and bequeathed the whole of his kingdom to Rome in order to avoid another bloody conquest. This gained Rome the province of [[Roman Asia]] and a permanent foothold in the east. Rome had by these conquests, started a centuries-long process of incorporating much of the Hellenised eastern parts of the Mediterranean basin under Roman rule, with the first Roman emperor [[Augustus]]' conquest of [[Roman Egypt|Egypt]] being the most notable. These contacts with the Greeks in the east ended up in the [[Greece in the Roman era|Roman conquest of Greece]], but also led to the [[Greco-Roman world|intertwining of the Roman and Greek worlds]]. By the second century AD, the Roman Empire reached its height during the reign of emperor [[Hadrian]] in a period known as [[Pax Romana]]. Rome had conquered territories covering the [[Balkans]], [[Anatolia|Asia Minor]] the whole Mediterranean basin and coastal regions in [[Iberian Peninsula|southwestern Europe]], [[Roman Gaul|Gaul]] and [[Roman Britain|Britannia]] and large swathes of North Africa. These territories were home to many different cultural groups, both urban populations and rural populations. The western parts of the Roman Empire went through [[Romanization (cultural)|Romanization]] while the eastern [[Hellenisation|Hellenised]] parts of the empire kept much of their Hellenistic culture intact.


Generally speaking, the eastern Mediterranean provinces were more urbanised and developed than the western provinces, having previously been united under the [[Macedonian Empire]] and [[Hellenisation|Hellenised]] by the influence of Greek culture.<ref name="Ostrogorsky 1959 21">{{Harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1959|p=21}}; {{Harvnb|Wells|1922|loc=Chapter 33}}.</ref> The emperor, during the period of Pax Romana, reigned in a system known as the [[Principate]] that kept the veneer of republican constitution alive in the minds of the Romans, with the emperor known as [[princeps]] civitatis, derived from a senatorial title Princeps Senatus "the first among equals" in the Senate. The emperor was known as "first among equals" in terms of all Roman citizens. The hallmark of the Principate form of government was the combination of republican institutions with that of an informal monarchical regime. The regime also often ruled its conquered provinces with a few hundred Roman provincial administrators, whose authority was above the local rulers and their already established power structure, which was left in place after the conquest. This was common, especially in the eastern Greek provinces of the Roman empire.
=== Pre-518: Constantinian, Theodosian, and Leonid dynasties ===
{{Further|Byzantine Empire under the Constantinian and Valentinianic dynasties|Byzantine Empire under the Theodosian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Leonid dynasty}}


==== Crisis of the third century and reforms of the empire ====
[[File:Tetrarchy map3.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Four-way division of the [[Roman Empire]] under the [[Tetrarchy]] system established by [[Diocletian]]|alt=A map showing the division of the Roman empire {{circa|300}}]]
{{More citations needed|date=July 2023}}
Between the 3rd and 1st centuries{{Nbsp}}BC, the [[Roman Republic]] established [[hegemony]] over the [[eastern Mediterranean]], while [[Ancient Rome#Government|its government]] developed into the one-person rule of [[Roman emperors|an emperor]].{{sfn|Greatrex|2008|p=233}} The [[Roman Empire]] enjoyed a period of [[Pax Romana|relative stability]] until [[Crisis of the Third Century|the 3rd century AD]], when external threats and internal crises caused it to splinter, as regional armies acclaimed their generals as "[[Barracks emperor|soldier-emperors]]".{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=233|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=16-17|Treadgold|1997|3p=7}} One of these, [[Diocletian]] ({{reign|284|305}}), recognised that the state was too big to be ruled by a single person.{{sfn|Greatrex|2008|p=233}} He instituted the [[Tetrarchy]], a system which divided the empire into eastern and western halves.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=17–18|Treadgold|1997|2pp=15, 17–18}} The Tetrarchy quickly failed, but the division of the empire proved an enduring concept.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=235|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=17–18|Treadgold|1997|3p=14}}
[[File:Tetrarchy map3.jpg|thumb|left|Map of the Roman Empire under the Tetrarchy, showing the dioceses and the four tetrarchs' zones of influence.]]


The third century showed some remarkable development for the empire as well as a potential decline and collapse. Emperor [[Caracalla]]'s edict in 212 AD known as the [[Constitutio Antoniniana|Antoninian constitution]] delivered Roman citizenship to every free man in the empire, starting the decline of the importance of the city of Rome and indeed of [[Roman Italy]] for the Roman Empire. By the mid-third century AD, Pax Romana had come to an end, and several crises hit the empire simultaneously in a period known to history as the [[Crisis of the third century]]. This period saw the empire exposed to rampant inflation, natural disasters, secession and civil wars taking places over several decades. The secessions ended with emperor [[Aurelian]]'s conquest of the secessionist [[Palmyrene Empire]] and [[Gallic Empire]] in 273 and 274 AD, as Aurelian unified a splintered empire which, according to many historians, should have been doomed. However, Aurelian was assassinated in 275 AD, sparking additional civil wars. The crisis came to an end only through the ascension of emperor Diocletian to the throne. The West suffered more heavily from these decades of crisis due to this distinction between the established and more prosperous Hellenised East and the younger colonized and Romanized West that had persisted. This cultural division of the Roman Empire into an eastern Greek and western Latin part became increasingly important in later centuries, leading to a gradual estrangement of the two Roman worlds.<ref name="Ostrogorsky 1959 21" />
[[Constantine I]] ({{reign|306|337|link=no}}) secured absolute power in 324.{{sfn|Greatrex|2008|p=235}} Over the next six years, he rebuilt the city of Byzantium as a new [[capital city|capital]] that he called "New Rome" (later named [[Constantinople]]).{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=235|Treadgold|1997|2pp=39–40|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=18}} The old capital [[Rome]] was farther from the prosperous eastern provinces and in a less strategically important location; it was not esteemed by the "soldier-emperors", who ruled from the frontiers, or by the empire's population.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=17, 20}} [[Constitutio Antoniniana|Having been granted citizenship]], they considered themselves just as Roman as those in the city of Rome.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=18–20}} He continued reforms of the empire's military and civil administration and instituted the [[solidus (coin)|gold solidus]] as a stable currency.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=235–236|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=43–44}} He [[Constantine the Great and Christianity|favoured Christianity]] and became an opponent of paganism.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=236–237|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=81–84|Treadgold|1997|3pp=31–33, 40–42}} Constantine's dynasty prioritised [[Perso-Roman wars of 337–361|a lengthy conflict]] against the comparably powerful [[Sasanian Empire|Sasanid Persia]] and ended in 363 with the death of his nephew [[Julian (emperor)|Julian]].{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=238|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=93, 98, 111-112|Treadgold|1997|3pp=52-53, 59–62}} The reign of the short [[Valentinianic dynasty]], marked by [[Gothic Wars#Fourth century|wars against the Goths]], religious debates, and anti-corruption campaigns, ended in the East with the death of [[Valens]] at the [[Battle of Adrianople]] in 378.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=239–240|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=114–118, 121–123|Treadgold|1997|3pp=63–67}}


Emperor Diocletian created the administrative system known as the [[Dominate]] to guarantee security in all endangered regions of his empire. The Dominate was in comparison with the Principate, a huge imperial bureaucracy, which laid the foundations for the power structure of the later Eastern Roman Empire. With this came a redistricting and reduction of Roman provinces. Diocletian scrapped any pretense of republican rule as the emperor moved away from formally being merely "Princeps" to being "Dominus" - Lord and master. Diocletian also formally finished the process of restructuring the empire, from being a colonial-styled empire ruled by Rome and Roman Italians in the first century AD to a larger imperial entity where the emperor's court was not bound to the city of Rome or Italy, now only one Roman imperial province among many. The norm of emperors being Roman Italians was first broken by emperor [[Trajan]] who came from [[Hispania]]. By the time of the [[Severan dynasty]], most emperors were originating from outside of Italy. When Diocletian introduced his reforms, this had the effect of the [[Roman Senate]] formally lost its already declining imperial influence and became a de facto regional body of decision-making.
[[File:Roman-empire-395AD.svg|thumb|upright=1.2|Division of the empire after the death of Theodosius I in 395{{Legend|#85d295|The Western Roman Empire}} {{Legend|#ed9595|The Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire}}|alt=A map showing the Western and Eastern Roman empires {{circa|395}}, divided in the Balkans and North Africa]]


An early instance of the partition of the empire into East and West occurred in 286, when Emperor [[Diocletian]] appointed [[Maximian]] as ''[[Augustus (title)|augustus]]'' of the West. In 293 AD, the empire went through a devolution under Diocletian known as the [[Tetrarchy]]. The empire was split into four, with the two most prominent parts of the empire each ruled by one emperor (''Augustus''). Each co-emperor then appointed a young colleague as ''[[Caesar (title)|caesar]]'' to be a subordinate emperor with control over his own territory. The Caesar shared power with and would eventually succeed the senior partner. Each tetrarch was in charge of a part of the empire, with the divisions based on geographic regions. This devolution outlines the coming split 100 years later when the empire was permanently divided into an eastern and western empire. The tetrarchy however only lasted 20 years, as emperors quickly began [[Civil wars of the Tetrarchy|fighting each other for power]]. The whole empire was eventually reunited by [[Constantine the Great]] in 324 after he ended the last of these civil wars.<ref name="Kuhoff">{{Harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=[https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/1*.html#1 p. 1]}}; {{Harvnb|Kuhoff|2002|pp=177–178}}.</ref>
Valens's successor, [[Theodosius I|Theodosius&nbsp;I]] ({{reign|379|395|link=no}}), secured peace in the east by allowing the [[Goths]] to settle in Roman territory;{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=240|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=128–129|Treadgold|1997|3p=73}} he also twice intervened in the western half, defeating the usurpers [[Magnus Maximus]] and [[Eugenius]] in 388 and 394, respectively.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=241|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=129-130, 135–137|Treadgold|1997|3pp=74–75}} He [[Persecution of pagans under Theodosius I|actively condemned paganism]], confirmed the primacy of [[Nicene Christianity|Nicene Orthodoxy]] over [[Arianism]] in the East, and established [[Christianity as the Roman state religion]].{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=240–241|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=126–128|Treadgold|1997|3pp=70-74}} He was the last emperor to rule both the western and eastern halves of the empire.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=136}} After his death, the West was destabilised but the East thrived due to the civilian administrators who continued to hold power.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=165|Treadgold|1997|2p=87}} [[Theodosius II|Theodosius&nbsp;II]] ({{reign|408|450|link=no}}) largely left the rule of the East to officials such as [[Anthemius (praetorian prefect)|Anthemius]], who constructed the [[Theodosian Walls]].{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=165–167, 244}} Constantinople had now entrenched itself as the empire's capital.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=242|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=15, 20-21}}


==== Christianisation and partition of the empire ====
Aside from Constantinople's walls, Theodosius' reign was also marked by the compilation of the ''[[Codex Theodosianus]]''{{sfnm|Shepard|2009|1p=22-23|Treadgold|1997|2pp=91-92}} and the theological dispute over [[Nestorianism]] (a doctrine later deemed [[heretical]]).{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=242|Kaldellis|2023|2p=173|Treadgold|1997|3pp=92}} His reign also saw the arrival of [[Attila]]'s [[Huns]], who ravaged the [[Balkans]], leading to a large [[tribute]] being exacted from the eastern empire.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=193–196|Treadgold|1997|2pp=94–95}} Attila switched his attention to the [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|rapidly-deteriorating western empire]],{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=200|Treadgold|1997|2p=209}} and his people fractured after his death in 453.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|pp=242–243}} Later, [[Leo I (emperor)|Leo&nbsp;I]] ({{reign|457|474|link=no}}) failed in his [[Basiliscus#Military career|468 attempt to reconquer]] the [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|West]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=209|Greatrex|2008|2pp=243|Treadgold|1997|3pp=153}} The warlord [[Odoacer]] deposed [[Romulus Augustulus]] in 476 and after the assassination of his titular successor [[Julius Nepos]] in 480, abolished the office of western emperor.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=244|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=214|Treadgold|1997|3pp=158–159}}
{{See also|Byzantine Empire under the Constantinian and Valentinianic dynasties}}


[[File:Walls of Constantinople.JPG|thumb|left|220px|upright=1.15|Restored section of the [[Walls of Constantinople]]]]
Through a combination of fortune and good political decisions, the Eastern Empire never experienced rebellious barbarian vassals or rule by barbarian warlords—the problems which ensured the downfall of the West.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=243–245}} [[Zeno (emperor)|Zeno]] ({{reign|474|491|link=no}}) convinced the problematic [[Ostrogoth]] king [[Theodoric the Great|Theodoric]] to take control of Italy from Odoacer;{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=244|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=220|Treadgold|1997|3pp=162, 164}} dying when the empire was at peace, he was succeeded by [[Anastasius I Dicorus|Anastasius&nbsp;I]] ({{reign|491|518|link=no}}).{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=244|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=220|Treadgold|1997|3pp=164}} His belief in [[monophysitism]] brought occasional issues, but Anastasius was a capable administrator and instituted successful financial reforms including the abolition of the [[Collatio lustralis|chrysargyron tax]].{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=244|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=224}} He was the first emperor since Diocletian not to face any serious problems affecting the empire during his reign.{{sfn|Treadgold|1997|p=172}}
[[File:Rome-Capitole-StatueConstantin.jpg|thumb|200px|[[Constantine the Great]] was the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity and moved the seat of the empire to [[Byzantium]], renamed [[Constantinople]] in his honour.]]


[[File:Roman-empire-395AD.svg|thumb|right|250px|Division of the empire after the death of Theodosius I in 395. The west [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|disintegrated in the late 400s]] while the east ended with the [[fall of Constantinople]] in 1453. {{Legend|#85d295|The Western Roman Empire}} {{Legend|#ed9595|The Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire}}]]
=== 518–717: Justinian and Heraclian dynasties ===
 
{{Further|Byzantine Empire under the Justinian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Heraclian dynasty}}
In 330, Constantine moved the seat of the empire to Constantinople, which he founded as a second Rome on the site of Byzantium, a city strategically located on the trade routes between Europe and Asia and between the Mediterranean and the [[Black Sea]]. Constantine introduced substantial changes to the empire's military, monetary, civil and religious institutions. In regards to his economic policies he has been accused by certain scholars of "reckless fiscality", but the gold [[solidus (coin)|solidus]] he introduced became a stable currency that transformed the economy and promoted development.<ref name="Esler-1081">{{Harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=[https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/1*.html#1 p. 1]}}; {{Harvnb|Esler|2004|p=1081}}; {{Harvnb|Gibbon|1906|loc=Volume III, Part IV, Chapter 18, p. 168}}; {{Harvnb|Teall|1967|pp=13, 19–23, 25, 28–30, 35–36}}</ref>
 
Under Constantine, Christianity did not become the exclusive religion of the state but enjoyed imperial preference since [[Constantine the Great and Christianity|he supported it with generous privileges]]. Constantine established the principle that emperors could not settle questions of doctrine on their own but should instead summon [[Ecumenical council|general ecclesiastical councils]] for that purpose. His convening of both the [[Synod of Arles]] and the [[First Council of Nicaea]] indicated his interest in the unity of the Church and showcased his claim to be its head.<ref name="B163">{{Harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=[https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/2*.html#5 p. 63]}}; {{Harvnb|Drake|1995|p=5}}; {{Harvnb|Grant|1975|pp=4, 12}}.</ref> The rise of Christianity was briefly interrupted on the accession of the emperor [[Julian (emperor)|Julian]] in 361, who made a determined effort to restore polytheism throughout the empire and was thus dubbed "Julian the Apostate" by the Church.{{Sfn|Bowersock|1997|p=79}} However, this was reversed when Julian was killed in battle in 363.{{Sfn|Greatrex|Lieu|2002|p=1}}
 
[[Theodosius I]] (379–395) was the last emperor to rule both the Eastern and Western halves of the empire. In 391 and 392 he [[Persecution of pagans under Theodosius I|issued a series of edicts essentially banning pagan religion]]. Pagan festivals and sacrifices were banned, as was access to all pagan temples and places of worship.{{Sfn|Friell|Williams|2005|p=105}} The last [[Ancient Olympic Games|Olympic Games]] are believed to have been held in 393.{{Sfn|Perrottet|2004|p=190}} In 395, Theodosius I bequeathed the imperial office jointly to his sons: [[Arcadius]] in the East and [[Honorius (emperor)|Honorius]] in the West, once again dividing imperial administration. In the 5th century, the Eastern part of the empire was largely spared the difficulties faced by the West—due in part to a more established urban culture and greater financial resources, which allowed it to placate invaders with [[tribute]] and pay foreign mercenaries. This success allowed [[Theodosius II]] to focus on codifying Roman law with the ''[[Codex Theodosianus]]'' and further fortification of [[Walls of Constantinople|the walls of Constantinople]], which left the city impervious to most attacks until 1204.{{Sfn|Cameron|2009|pp=54, 111, 153}}
 
To fend off the [[Huns]], Theodosius had to pay an enormous annual tribute to [[Attila]]. His successor, [[Marcian]], refused to continue to pay the tribute, but Attila had already diverted his attention to the [[Western Roman Empire]]. After Attila's death in 453, the Hun Empire collapsed, and many of the remaining Huns were often hired as mercenaries by Constantinople.<ref>{{Harvnb|Alemany|2000|p=207}}; {{Harvnb|Bayless|1976|pp=176–177}}; {{Harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=184, 193}}.</ref>
 
==== Loss of the Western Roman Empire ====
After the fall of Attila, the Eastern Empire enjoyed a period of peace, while the Western Empire [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|continued to deteriorate]] with the expanding [[Migration Period|migration and invasions]] of the [[Barbarian kingdoms|barbarians]], most prominently the [[Germania|Germanic nations]]. The West's end is usually dated 476 when the [[East Germanic]] Roman ''[[foederati]]'' general [[Odoacer]] deposed the Western Emperor [[Romulus Augustulus]], a year after the latter usurped the position from [[Julius Nepos]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=52}}</ref> In 480 with the death of Nepos, [[Roman emperor|Eastern Emperor]] [[Zeno (emperor)|Zeno]] became sole claimant to emperor of the empire. Odoacer became [[King of Italy]] and was nominally Zeno's subordinate but acted with complete autonomy, eventually providing support to a rebellion against the emperor.<ref name="Burns 1991 65, 76–77, 86–87">{{Harvnb|Burns|1991|pp=65, 76–77, 86–87}}</ref>
 
Zeno negotiated with the invading [[Ostrogoths]], who had settled in [[Moesia]], convincing the Gothic king [[Theodoric the Great|Theodoric]] to depart for Italy as ''magister militum per Italiam'' ("commander in chief for Italy") to depose Odoacer. By urging Theodoric to conquer Italy, Zeno rid the Eastern Empire of an unruly subordinate (Odoacer) and moved another (Theodoric) further from the heart of the empire. After Odoacer's defeat in 493, Theodoric ruled Italy ''[[de facto]]'', although he was never recognised by the eastern emperors as "king" (''rex'').<ref name="Burns 1991 65, 76–77, 86–87" />
 
In 491, [[Anastasius I Dicorus|Anastasius I]], an aged civil officer of [[Roman empire|Roman origin]], became emperor, but it was not until 497 that the forces of Anastasius effectively took the measure of [[Isaurian War|Isaurian resistance]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Lenski|1999|pp=428–429}}.</ref> Anastasius revealed himself as an energetic reformer and an able administrator. He introduced a new coinage system of the copper ''[[follis]]'', the coin used in most everyday transactions.<ref>{{Harvnb|Grierson|1999|p=17}}.</ref> He also reformed the tax system and permanently abolished the [[Collatio lustralis|chrysargyron]] tax. The [[treasury|state treasury]] contained the enormous sum of {{Convert|320000|lbs|kg|abbr=on}} of gold when Anastasius died in 518 (roughly worth US$8.3 billion today).<ref>{{Harvnb|Postan|Miller|Postan|1987|p=140}}.</ref>
 
=== Justinian dynasty ===
{{See also|Byzantine Empire under the Justinian dynasty}}
{{Multiple image
{{Multiple image
| align       = right
| perrow            = 2
| image1     = Mosaic of Justinianus I - Basilica San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg
| align             = right
| width1      = 130
| image1           = Mosaic of Justinianus I - Basilica San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg
| alt1       =
| alt1             = A close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden coloured background. The person has a dark brown cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, three jewels on his right shoulder, a crown with two pendants each hanging from both ends and an aura like circle around his head
| caption1    =
| image2           = Belisarius mosaic.jpg
| image2     = Belisarius mosaic.jpg
| alt2             = A close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden coloured background. The person has a white cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, an embroidered pattern on his right shoulder, wavy hair, a stubble beard and a moustache
| width2      = 140
| footer           = Emperor [[Justinian I]] (''left'') and his general [[Belisarius]] (''right''). [[Mosaic]]s, 6th century, from the [[Basilica of San Vitale]], Ravenna, Italy
| alt2       =
| direction         =
| caption2    =
| total_width       = 270
| footer     = Emperor [[Justinian]] (left) and (presumed) general [[Belisarius]] (right), mosaic from [[Basilica of San Vitale]], 6th century)
| direction   =
| total_width =
}}
}}
[[File:Mosaic of Theodora - Basilica San Vitale (Ravenna, Italy).jpg|thumb|upright=1.20|Empress [[Theodora (6th century)|Theodora]] and attendants (Mosaic from [[Basilica of San Vitale]], 6th century)]]
<!--The Acacian schism should be discussed in the Religion section. Whether the renovatio imperii existed at all is not within the scope of this article.-->
[[File:Hagia_Sophia_Mars_2013.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Hagia Sophia]] built in 537, during the reign of [[Justinian I|Justinian]]. The [[minaret]]s were added in the 15th–16th centuries by the [[Ottoman Empire]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Emerson |first1=William |last2=van Nice |first2=Robert L. |date=1950 |title=Hagia Sophia and the First Minaret Erected after the Conquest of Constantinople |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/500639 |journal=American Journal of Archaeology |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=28–40 |doi=10.2307/500639 |issn=0002-9114 |jstor=500639 |s2cid=193099976 |access-date=25 February 2021 |archive-date=19 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210319010721/https://www.jstor.org/stable/500639 |url-status=live }}</ref>]]
[[File:Byzantine and Sassanid Empires in 600 CE.png|thumb|250px|right|The Byzantine Empire in {{Circa|600}} during the reign of Maurice. Half of the Italian peninsula and most of southern Hispania were lost, but positions in [[Byzantine North Africa|north Africa]] maintained and the eastern borders expanded, gaining land from the Persians.]]


==== The rise of Justinian I ====
The reign of [[Justinian I|Justinian&nbsp;I]] was a high point in east Roman history.{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|p=250}} Following his accession in 527, the legal code was rewritten as the ''[[Corpus Juris Civilis]]'', which streamlined Roman law across the empire;{{sfnm|Louth|2009a|1pp=108–109|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=269–271|Treadgold|1997|3pp=179}} he reasserted imperial control over religion and morality through purges of pagans, heretics, and other "deviants";{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=272|Louth|2009a|2pp=116|Treadgold|1997|3pp=80}} and having ruthlessly subdued [[Nika riots|the 532 Nika revolt]] he rebuilt much of Constantinople, including the [[Hagia Sophia]].{{sfnm|Louth|2009a|1pp=111, 120|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=274–276}} Justinian I took advantage of the confusion, following Theoderic the Ostrogoth's death, to attempt the reconquest of Italy.{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|p=252}} The [[Vandal Kingdom]] in North Africa [[Vandalic War|was subjugated in late 533]] by the general [[Belisarius]],{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=281|Moorhead|2009|2p=202}} who [[Gothic War (535–554)|then invaded Italy]]; the [[Ostrogothic Kingdom]] mostly ended in 554.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=306|Moorhead|2009|2p=209|Haldon|2008a|3p=253}}
The Justinian dynasty was founded by [[Justin I]], who though illiterate, rose through the ranks of the [[Byzantine army]] to become emperor in 518.<ref>{{Harvnb|Chapman|1971|p=210}}</ref> He was succeeded by his nephew [[Justinian I]] in 527, who may already have exerted effective control during Justin's reign.<ref name="M290">{{Harvnb|Meier|2003|p=290}}.</ref> One of the most important figures of late antiquity and possibly the last Roman emperor to speak Latin as a first language,<ref name="theinheritance" /> Justinian's rule constitutes a distinct epoch, marked by the ambitious but only partly realised ''renovatio imperii'', or "restoration of the empire".<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=17}}</ref> Justinian's wife [[Theodora (wife of Justinian I)|Theodora]] was particularly influential.<ref>{{Harvnb|Evans|2005|p=104}}</ref>


In 529, Justinian appointed a ten-man commission chaired by [[John the Cappadocian]] to revise Roman law and create a new codification of laws and jurists' extracts, known as the "{{Lang|la|[[Corpus Juris Civilis]]}}", or the Justinian Code. In 534, the ''Corpus'' was updated and, along with the [[Novellae Constitutiones|enactments promulgated by Justinian after 534]], formed the system of law used for most of the rest of the Byzantine era.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gregory|2010|p=150}}.</ref> The ''Corpus'' forms the basis of [[civil law (legal system)|civil law]] of many modern states.<ref>{{Harvnb|Merryman|Perez-Perdomo|2007|p=7}}</ref>
In the 540s, Justinian began to suffer reversals on multiple fronts.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=297}} Capitalising on Constantinople's preoccupation with the West, [[Khosrow I|Khosrow&nbsp;I]] of the Sasanian Empire invaded Byzantine territory and sacked [[Antioch]] in 540.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=297|Treadgold|1997|2pp=193–194|Haldon|2008a|3pp=252–253}} [[Plague of Justinian|A devastating plague]] killed a large proportion of the population and severely reduced the empire's social and financial stability.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=300–301}} The most difficult period of the Ostrogothic war, against their king [[Totila]], came during this decade;{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=305}} while divisions among Justinian's advisors undercut the administration's response.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=197–198, 201|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=298, 305–306}} He also did not fully heal the divisions in [[Chalcedonian Christianity]], as the [[Second Council of Constantinople|fifth ecumenical council]] failed to make a real difference.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=210–211, 214|Louth|2009a|2pp=117–118|Haldon|2008a|3p=253}} Justinian died in 565; his reign was more successful than any other emperor, yet he left behind an unstable empire.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=318–319|Treadgold|1997|2p=217}}


==== Renovatio imperii and the wars of Justinian ====
[[Justin II|Justin&nbsp;II]] ({{reign|565|578}}) inherited an empire stretched thin both financially and territorially.{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|p=254}} He was soon at war on many fronts.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=254|Treadgold|1997|3pp=220–221}} Fearing the aggressive [[Pannonian Avars|Avars]], the [[Lombards]] conquered much of northern Italy by 572.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=254|Treadgold|1997|2pp=220–221}} The [[Byzantine–Sasanian War of 572–591|Sasanian wars restarted]] in the same year, and would not conclude until 591;{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|p=254}} by this time, the Avars and [[Slavic migrations to the Balkans|Slavs had repeatedly invaded the Balkans]], causing great instability.{{sfnm|Louth|2009a|1pp=126–127|Haldon|2008a|2p=254|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=336}} [[Maurice (emperor)|Maurice]] [[Maurice's Balkan campaigns|campaigned extensively in the region]] during the 590s, and although he re-established Byzantine control up to the [[Danube River|Danube]], he pushed his troops too far in 602—they mutinied, proclaimed an officer named [[Phocas]] as emperor, and executed Maurice.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=336–338|Treadgold|1997|2pp=234–235|Haldon|2008a|3p=254}} The Sasanians seized their moment and [[Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628|reopened hostilities]];{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=347-348|Louth|2009b|2pp=226}} Phocas was unable to cope and soon faced [[Heraclian revolt|a major rebellion]] led by [[Heraclius]].{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=348}} Phocas lost Constantinople in 610 and was executed;{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=254|Louth|2009b|2pp=226}} this destructive civil war accelerated the empire's decline.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=349|Treadgold|1997|2p=241}}
In 532, attempting to secure his eastern frontier, Justinian signed a peace treaty with [[Khosrow I|Khosrau I of Persia]], agreeing to pay a large annual tribute to the [[Sasanian Empire|Sassanids]]. In the same year, he survived a revolt in Constantinople (the [[Nika riots]]), which solidified his power but ended with the deaths of a reported 30,000 to 35,000 rioters on his orders.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gregory|2010|p=137}}; {{Harvnb|Meier|2003|pp=297–300}}.</ref> The western conquests began in 533, as Justinian sent his general [[Belisarius]] to reclaim the former province of [[Africa (Roman province)|Africa]] from the [[Vandals]], who had been in control since 429 with their capital at [[Carthage]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Gregory|2010|p=145}}.</ref> [[Vandalic War|Success in the war]] came with surprising ease, but it was not until 548 that the major local tribes were subdued.<ref name="Ev">{{Harvnb|Evans|2005|p=xxv}}.</ref>


In 535, a small Byzantine [[Gothic War (535–554)|expedition to Sicily]] met with easy success, but the [[Goths]] stiffened their resistance, and victory did not come until 540 when Belisarius captured [[Ravenna]], after successful sieges of [[Siege of Naples (536)|Naples]] and [[Siege of Rome (537–538)|Rome]].<ref name="B180-216">{{Harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=[https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/18C*.html pp. 180–216]}}; {{Harvnb|Evans|2005|pp=xxvi, 76}}.</ref> In 535–536, [[Ostrogoths|Ostrogoth]] King [[Theodahad]] sent [[Pope Agapetus I]] to Constantinople to request the removal of Byzantine forces from Sicily, [[Dalmatia (Roman province)|Dalmatia]], and Italy. Although Agapetus failed in his mission to sign a peace with Justinian, he succeeded in having the [[Monophysitism|monophysite]] Patriarch [[Anthimus I of Constantinople|Anthimus I]] denounced at the [[Council of Constantinople (536)|Council of Constantinople]], despite Empress Theodora's support and protection.<ref name="Maas278T187">{{Harvnb|Sotinel|2005|p=278}}; {{Harvnb|Treadgold|1997|p=187}}.</ref>
[[File:Walls of Constantinople.JPG|thumb|left|upright=1.2|The [[Walls of Constantinople|Theodosian Walls]] of Constantinople, very important during the [[siege of Constantinople (717–718)|717–718 siege]]|alt=A photograph of a large double-layered fortification.]]


The Ostrogoths [[Sack of Rome (546)|captured Rome]] in 546. Belisarius, who had been sent back to Italy in 544, was eventually recalled to Constantinople in 549.<ref name="B236-258">{{Harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=[https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/19B*.html pp. 236–258]}}; {{Harvnb|Evans|2005|p=xxvi}}.</ref> The arrival of the Armenian eunuch [[Narses]] in Italy (late 551) with an army of 35,000 men marked another shift in Gothic fortunes. Ostrogoth King [[Totila]] was defeated at the [[Battle of Taginae]], and his successor [[Teia]] was defeated at the [[Battle of Mons Lactarius]] in October 552. Despite continuing resistance from a few Gothic garrisons and two subsequent invasions by the [[Franks]] and [[Alemanni]], the war for the Italian peninsula was at an end.<ref name="B259-281">{{Harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=[https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/19C*.html pp. 259–281]}}; {{Harvnb|Evans|2005|p=93}}.</ref> In 551, [[Athanagild]], a noble from [[Visigoths|Visigothic]] [[Hispania]], sought Justinian's help in a rebellion against the king, and the emperor dispatched a force under [[Liberius (praetorian prefect)|Liberius]], a successful military commander. The empire held on to a small slice of the [[Spania|Iberian Peninsula]] coast until the reign of [[Heraclius]].<ref name="B86-288">{{Harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=[https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/19D*.html pp. 286–288]}}; {{Harvnb|Evans|2005|p=11}}.</ref>
Under [[Khosrow II|Khosrow&nbsp;II]], the Sassanids occupied the [[Levant]] and Egypt and advanced into Asia Minor, and the Avars and Slavs raided in the Balkans.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1pp=254–255|Treadgold|1997|2pp=290-293|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=352, 355-356, 360}} The Empire's control of Italy also weakened.{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|pp=254–255}} After successfully repelling [[Siege of Constantinople (626)|a siege of Constantinople]] in 626,{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|p=255}} Heraclius won a decisive victory at the [[Battle of Nineveh (627)|Battle of Nineveh]],{{sfn|Treadgold|1997|p=398}} eventually defeating the Sassanids later that year.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=365-366|Louth|2009b|2pp=227–229}} The triumph would prove short-lived.{{sfnm|Louth|2009b|1p=229|Kaldellis|2023|2p=372}} The [[early Muslim conquests|Arab conquests]] soon saw the [[Muslim conquest of the Levant|conquest of the Levant]], [[Arab conquest of Egypt|Egypt]], and [[Muslim conquest of Persia|the Sassanid Empire]] by the newly formed Arab [[Rashidun Caliphate]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=375|Haldon|2008a|2p=256|Louth|2009b|3pp=229–230}} By Heraclius' death in 641, the empire had been severely reduced economically and territorially—the loss of the wealthy eastern provinces had deprived the empire of as much as three-quarters of its revenue.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=387|Haldon|2008a|2p=256}}


In the east, the [[Roman–Persian Wars]] continued until 561 when the envoys of Justinian and Khosrau agreed on a 50-year peace.<ref>{{Harvnb|Greatrex|2005|p=489}}; {{Harvnb|Greatrex|Lieu|2002|p=113}}</ref> By the mid-550s, Justinian had won victories in most theatres of operation, with the notable exception of the [[Balkans]], which were subjected to repeated incursions from the [[Slavs]] and the [[Gepids]]. Tribes of [[Serbs]] and [[Croats]] were later resettled in the northwestern Balkans, during the reign of Heraclius.<ref>{{Harvnb|Bury|1920|loc=[https://archive.org/stream/earlyhistoryofsl00consrich#page/n9/mode/1up "Preface", pp. v–vi]}}</ref> Justinian called Belisarius out of retirement and [[Battle of Melantias|defeated the new Hunnish threat]]. The strengthening of the Danube fleet caused the [[Kutrigurs|Kutrigur]] Huns to withdraw, and they agreed to a treaty that allowed safe passage back across the Danube.<ref>{{Harvnb|Evans|2005|pp=11, 56–62}}; {{Harvnb|Sarantis|2009|loc=''passim''}}.</ref>
The next century is poorly documented.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=387}} [[Arab–Byzantine wars#Arab attacks on Anatolia and sieges of Constantinople|Arab raids into Asia Minor]] started quickly, and the Empire responded by holding fortified centres and avoiding battle wherever possible.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=257|Kaldellis|2023|2p=387}} Although Anatolia was invaded annually, it avoided permanent Arab occupation.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=387}} The outbreak of the [[First Fitna]] in 656 gave the Empire breathing space, which it used sensibly:{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=389}} some order was restored in the Balkans by [[Constans II|Constans&nbsp;II]] ({{reign|641|668|link=no}}){{sfn|Louth|2009b|pp=230–231}} following his administrative reorganisation which over time evolved into the "[[Theme (Byzantine district)|theme system]]", a structure that allocated troops to defend specific provinces.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=315–316|Louth|2009b|2pp=239–240}} [[Constantine IV]] ({{reign|668|685|link=no}}) repelled the Arab efforts to [[Siege of Constantinople (674–678)|capture Constantinople in the 670s]] using [[Greek fire]],{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=323–327|Haldon|2008a|2p=258|Louth|2009b|3pp=233}} but suffered a reversal against the [[Bulgars]], who soon established [[First Bulgarian Empire|an empire in the northern Balkans]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=403|Haldon|2008a|2pp=257–258|Louth|2009b|3pp=233}} Nevertheless, he had done enough to secure the empire's position,{{sfn|Louth|2009b|p=235}} especially as the [[Umayyad Caliphate]] was undergoing [[Second Fitna|another civil war]].{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=403}}


====Transition into an eastern Christian empire====
Beginning in 695, when Constantine's son [[Justinian II|Justinian&nbsp;II]] was first deposed, the empire entered an [[Twenty Years' Anarchy|era of political instability]] that lasted for the next 22 years.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=257|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=438–440|Auzépy|2009|3p=265}} While Justinian had stabilised the situation with the divided Arabs,{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|p=257}} the threat of the reconstituted caliphate was met by [[Leo III the Isaurian|Leo&nbsp;III]] when he [[siege of Constantinople (717–718)|repelled the 717–718 siege]], the first serious challenge against Arab expansion.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=257|Auzépy|2009|2p=265}}
[[File:Sultanahmet_Square,_Obelisk_of_Theodosius,_Istanbul_(52121868925).jpg|thumb|[[Nika riots]] started in [[Hippodrome of Constantinople]] during the reign of Emperor Justinian I.]]
Although polytheism had been [[Historiography of Christianization of the Roman Empire|suppressed by the state]] since at least the time of Theodosius I in the 4th century, traditional Greco-Roman culture was still influential in the Eastern empire in the 6th century.<ref>{{Harvnb|Evans|2005|p=65}}</ref> [[Hellenistic philosophy]] began to be gradually amalgamated into newer [[Christian philosophy]]. Philosophers such as [[John Philoponus]] drew on [[neoplatonism|neoplatonic]] ideas in addition to Christian thought and [[empiricism]]. Because of the active paganism of its professors, Justinian closed down the [[Neoplatonic Academy]] in 529. Other schools continued in Constantinople, [[Antioch]] and [[Alexandria]], which were the centres of Justinian's empire.<ref>{{Harvnb|Evans|2005|p=68}}</ref> Hymns written by [[Romanos the Melodist]] marked the development of the [[Divine Liturgy]], while the architects [[Isidore of Miletus]] and [[Anthemius of Tralles]] worked to complete the Church of the [[Sophia (wisdom)|Holy Wisdom]], [[Hagia Sophia]], which was designed to replace an older church destroyed during the Nika Revolt. Completed in 537, the Hagia Sophia stands today as one of the major monuments of Byzantine architectural history.<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=113, 128}}.</ref> During the 6th and 7th centuries, the empire was struck by a [[Plague of Justinian|series of epidemics]], which devastated the population and contributed to a significant economic decline and a weakening of the empire.<ref>{{Harvnb|Bray|2004|pp=19–47}}; {{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=110–111}}; {{Harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=196–197}}.</ref> Great [[Bath House|bathhouses]] were built in Byzantine centres such as Constantinople and Antioch.{{Sfn|Kazhdan|1991}}


==== Decline of the Justinian dynasty====
=== 718–867: Isaurian, Nikephorian, and Amorian dynasties ===
After Justinian died in 565, his successor, [[Justin II]], refused to pay the large tribute to the Persians. Meanwhile, the Germanic [[Lombards]] invaded Italy; by the end of the century, only a third of Italy was in Byzantine hands. Justin II's successor, [[Tiberius II Constantine|Tiberius II]], choosing between his enemies, awarded subsidies to the [[Pannonian Avars|Avars]] while taking military action against the Persians. Although Tiberius' general, [[Maurice (emperor)|Maurice]], led an effective campaign on the eastern frontier, subsidies failed to restrain the Avars, who [[Siege of Sirmium|captured the Balkan fortress]] of [[Sirmium]] in 582, while the Slavs began to make inroads across the Danube.<ref name="Louth 2005 113–115">{{Harvnb|Louth|2005|pp=113–115}}; {{Harvnb|Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou|1970|loc=''passim''}}; {{Harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=231–232}}.</ref>
{{Further|Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Nikephorian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Amorian dynasty}}
[[File:Solidus-Leo III and Constantine V-sb1504.jpg|thumb|Gold ''solidus'' of [[Leo III the Isaurian|Leo&nbsp;III]] (left) and his son and heir, [[Constantine V]] (right)|alt=Two gold coins, each depicting a man]]


Maurice succeeded Tiberius and intervened in a Persian civil war, placing the legitimate [[Khosrow II|Khosrau II]] back on the throne, and married his daughter to him. Maurice's treaty with his son-in-law enlarged the territories of the empire to the East and allowed the energetic emperor to focus on the Balkans. By 602, a [[Maurice's Balkan campaigns|series of successful Byzantine campaigns]] had pushed the Avars and Slavs back across the Danube.<ref name="Louth 2005 113–115" /> However, Maurice's refusal to ransom several thousand captives taken by the Avars, and his order to the troops to winter in the Danube, caused his popularity to plummet. A revolt broke out under an officer named Phocas, who marched the troops back to Constantinople; Maurice and his family were murdered while trying to escape.<ref>{{Harvnb|Fine|1991|p=33}}</ref>
The emperors Leo III ({{reign|717|741}}) and [[Constantine V]] ({{reign|741|775|lk=no}}) were very effective leaders, both in government and warfare.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1pp=258–259|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=443}} They withstood continued Arab attacks,{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1pp=257|Auzépy|2009|2pp=255}} as well as civil war and natural disasters.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=450-451|Auzépy|2009|2pp=255, 258-259}} Constantine's success reestablished the state as a major regional power.{{sfn|Haldon|2008a|p=259}} Leo's reign produced the ''[[Ecloga]]'', a code of law that evolved that of Justinian&nbsp;I.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=444–445|Auzépy|2009|2pp=275–276}}  He also continued to reform the theme system in order to lead offensive campaigns against the Muslims,{{sfnm|Auzépy|2009|p=255}} culminating in [[Battle of Akroinon|a notable victory in 740]].{{sfnm|Auzépy|2009|1pp=265-269|Kaegi|2009|2pp=386|Kaldellis|2023|3p=450}} Constantine overcame an early civil war against his brother-in-law [[Artabasdos]], created stability against the new [[Abbasid Caliphate]], [[Constantine V#Repeated campaigns against the Bulgarians|campaigned successfully]] against the Bulgars, and continued to make administrative and military reforms.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=260|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=450-451, 453-454}} Due to both emperors' support for the [[Byzantine Iconoclasm]], where the use of [[icon|religious icons]] was banned, they were later vilified by biased authors, creating issues that continue to impact modern scholarship;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=443, 447–449|Haldon|2008a|2pp=258, 260–261|Auzépy|2009|3pp=253–254}} Constantine's reign also saw the loss of [[Ravenna]] to the [[Kingdom of the Lombards|Lombards]], and the beginning of a split from the [[Papal States|Roman papacy]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=459–561|Auzépy|2009|2pp=284–287}}


=== Arab invasions and shrinking borders ===
In 780, Empress [[Irene of Athens|Irene]] assumed power as regent for her son [[Constantine VI]].{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=261|Treadgold|2002|2pp=141–142|Magdalino|2002|3p=170}} Although she was a capable administrator who temporarily resolved the iconoclasm controversy,{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=261|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=464–469}} the empire was destabilised by her conflict with her son. The Bulgars and Abbasids inflicted numerous defeats on the Byzantine armies, and the papacy crowned [[Charlemagne]] as Roman emperor in 800.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=470–473|Magdalino|2002|2pp=169–171|Haldon|2008a|3p=261}} In 802, the unpopular Irene was overthrown by [[Nikephoros I|Nikephoros&nbsp;I]]; he reformed the empire's administration but died [[Battle of Pliska|in battle against the Bulgars]] in 811.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=473–474, 478–481}} Military defeats and societal disorder, especially the resurgence of iconoclasm, characterised the next eighteen years.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=265|Auzépy|2009|2pp=257, 259, 289|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=482–483, 485–491}}


==== Early Heraclian dynasty ====
[[File:Byzantine Empire 814.svg|thumb|The Byzantine Empire {{Circa|814}}|alt=Map centred on Western Europe. The territories of the Byzantine Empire are shaded dark green; namely the Italian islands, southern Greece, south-central Bulgaria, southern Crimea and most of Turkey.]]
{{Further|Byzantine Empire under the Heraclian dynasty}}
[[File:Piero della Francesca 021.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Battle between Heraclius and the Persians. Fresco by [[Piero della Francesca]], {{Circa|1452}}]]
[[File:Byzantiumby650AD.svg|thumb|250px|By 650 (pictured) the empire had lost all its southern provinces, except the [[Exarchate of Africa]], to the Rashidun Caliphate. At the same time the Slavs invaded and settled in the Balkans.]]


After Maurice's murder by [[Phocas]], Khosrau used the pretext to reconquer the [[Mesopotamia (Roman province)|Roman province of Mesopotamia]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Foss|1975|p=722}}.</ref> Phocas, an unpopular ruler invariably described in Byzantine sources as a "tyrant", was the target of a number of Senate-led plots. He was eventually [[Heraclian revolt|deposed in 610 by Heraclius]], who sailed to Constantinople from Carthage with an icon affixed to the prow of his ship.<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=41}}; {{Harvnb|Speck|1984|p=178}}.</ref>
Stability was somewhat restored during the reign of [[Theophilos (emperor)|Theophilos]] ({{reign|829|842|link=no}}). He capitalised on economic growth to complete construction programmes, including rebuilding the [[Walls of Constantinople#Sea walls|sea walls of Constantinople]], overhaul provincial governance, and wage inconclusive campaigns against the Abbasids.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=491–495|Holmes|2008|2p=265|Auzépy|2009|3pp=273–274}} After his death, his empress [[Theodora (wife of Theophilos)|Theodora]], ruling on behalf of her son [[Michael III|Michael&nbsp;III]], permanently extinguished the iconoclastic movement;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=498–501|Holmes|2008|2p=266}} the empire prospered under their sometimes-fraught rule. Michael was posthumously vilified by historians loyal to the dynasty of his successor [[Basil I|Basil&nbsp;I]], who had him assassinated in 867 and was credited with his predecessor's achievements.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=265–266|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=504–505|Auzépy|2009|3p=254|Tougher|2009|4pp=292–293, 296}}


Following the accession of Heraclius, the Sassanid advance pushed deep into the [[Levant]], occupying [[Damascus]] and [[Jerusalem]] and removing the [[True Cross]] to [[Ctesiphon]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=42–43}}.</ref> The [[Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628|counter-attack launched by Heraclius]] took on the character of a holy war, and an [[Acheiropoieta|acheiropoieton]] image of Christ was carried as a military standard<ref>{{Harvnb|Grabar|1984|p=37}}; {{Harvnb|Cameron|1979|p=23}}.</ref> (similarly, when Constantinople was saved from a combined Avar–Sassanid–Slavic [[Siege of Constantinople (626)|siege in 626]], the victory was attributed to the icons of the [[Mary, mother of Jesus|Virgin]] that were led in procession by [[Sergius I of Constantinople|Patriarch Sergius]] about the walls of the city).<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|1979|pp=5–6, 20–22}}.</ref> The combined forces unsuccessfully besieged the capital between June and July. After this, the Sassanid army was forced to withdraw to [[Anatolia]]. The loss came just after news had reached them of yet another Byzantine victory, where Heraclius's brother [[Theodore (brother of Heraclius)|Theodore]] heavily defeated the Persian general [[Shahin Vahmanzadegan|Shahin]].<ref name="Norwich93">{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=93}}</ref> Following this, Heraclius led an invasion into Sassanid Mesopotamia once again.
=== 867–1081: Macedonian and Doukas dynasties ===
{{Further|Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Doukas dynasty}}


The main Sassanid force [[Battle of Nineveh (627)|was destroyed at Nineveh]] in 627, and in 629 Heraclius restored the True Cross to Jerusalem in a majestic ceremony,<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=46}}; {{Harvnb|Baynes|1912}}, ''passim''; {{Harvnb|Speck|1984|p=178}}.</ref> as he marched into the Sassanid capital of Ctesiphon, where [[Sasanian civil war of 628–632|anarchy and civil war reigned]] as a result of the enduring war. Eventually, the Persians were obliged to withdraw all armed forces and return Sassanid-ruled [[Roman Egypt|Egypt]], the Levant and whatever imperial territories of Mesopotamia and [[Armenia]] were in Roman hands at the time of an earlier peace treaty in {{circa|595}}. The war had exhausted both the Byzantines and Sassanids, however, and left them extremely vulnerable to the [[Early Muslim conquests|Muslim forces]] that emerged in the following years.<ref>{{Harvnb|Foss|1975|pp=746–747}}.</ref> The Byzantines suffered a crushing defeat by the Arabs at the [[Battle of the Yarmuk|Battle of Yarmouk]] in 636, while [[Siege of Ctesiphon (637)|Ctesiphon fell]] to the [[Rashidun Caliphate]] in 637.<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=50}}.</ref>
Basil I ({{reign|867|886}}) continued Michael's policies.{{sfnm|Tougher|2009|1pp=292, 296|Holmes|2008|2p=266}} His armies campaigned with mixed results in Italy but [[Battle of Bathys Ryax|defeated]] the [[Paulician principality of Tephrike|Paulicians of Tephrike]].{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=266|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=522–524|Treadgold|1997|3pp=455–458}} His successor [[Leo VI the Wise|Leo VI]] ({{reign|886|912|link=no}}){{efn|Leo VI was officially the son of Basil I, but a persistent rumour alleged that he had been fathered by Michael III, who had previously taken Leo's mother [[Eudokia Ingerina]] as his mistress. One of Leo's first acts was to rebury Michael III in Basil's mausoleum in the [[Church of the Holy Apostles]] complex, which exacerbated the rumours.{{sfnm|Tougher|2009|1p=296|Kaldellis|2023|2p=526}}}} compiled and propagated a huge number of written works. These included the ''[[Basilika]]'', a Greek translation of Justinian I's legal code incorporating over 100 new laws created by Leo; the ''[[Tactica of Emperor Leo VI the Wise|Tactica]]'', a military treatise; and the ''[[Book of the Prefect|Book of the Eparch]]'', a manual on Constantinople's trading regulations.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=493, 496–498|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=429–433|Holmes|2008|3p=267}} In non-literary contexts Leo was less successful: the empire [[Siege of Taormina (902)|lost in Sicily]] and [[Battle of Boulgarophygon|against the Bulgarians]],{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=267|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=534–535}} and he provoked theological scandal by marrying four times in an attempt to father a legitimate heir.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=537–539|Holmes|2008|2p=267|Shepard|2009b|3p=503}}


==== First Arab siege of Constantinople (674–678) and the theme system ====
The early reign of this heir, [[Constantine VII]], was tumultuous, as his mother [[Zoe Karbonopsina|Zoe]], his uncle [[Alexander (Byzantine emperor)|Alexander]], the patriarch [[Nicholas Mystikos|Nicholas]], the powerful [[Simeon I of Bulgaria|Simeon&nbsp;I of Bulgaria]], and other influential figures jockeyed for power.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1p=505|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=540–543|Holmes|2008|3p=267}} In 920, the admiral [[Romanos I Lekapenos|Romanos&nbsp;I]] used his fleet to secure power, crowning himself and demoting Constantine to the position of junior co-emperor.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=543–544|Shepard|2009b|2pp=505–507}} His reign, marked by [[Byzantine–Bulgarian war of 913–927#Peace treaty|the end of the war against Bulgaria]] and successes in the east under the general [[John Kourkouas]], ended in 944 due to the machinations of his sons, whom Constantine then usurped.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=508–509|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=546–552|Holmes|2008|3p=268}} Constantine's ineffectual sole rule has often been construed as [[Macedonian Renaissance|the zenith of Byzantine learning]], but the works compiled were largely intended to legitimise and glorify the emperor's [[Macedonian dynasty]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=553–555|Holmes|2008|2p=268}} [[Romanos II|His son and successor]] died young; under two soldier-emperors, [[Nikephoros II Phokas|Nikephoros&nbsp;II]] ({{reign|963|969|link=no}}) and [[John I Tzimiskes]] ({{reign|969|976|link=no}}), the army claimed numerous military successes, including the [[Byzantine conquest of Cilicia|conquest of Cilicia]] and [[Siege of Antioch (968–969)|Antioch]], and a [[Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria|victory against Bulgaria and the Kievan Rus']] in 971. John in particular was an astute administrator who reformed military structures and implemented effective fiscal policies.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=563–573|Holmes|2008| 2pp=268–269|Magdalino|2002|3p=176}}
[[File:Greekfire-madridskylitzes1.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Greek fire]] was first used by the [[Byzantine Navy]] during the [[Arab–Byzantine wars|Byzantine–Arab Wars]] (from the [[Madrid Skylitzes]], [[Biblioteca Nacional de España]], Madrid).]]


The Arabs, firmly in control of Syria and the Levant, sent frequent raiding parties deep into Asia Minor, and in [[Siege of Constantinople (674–678)|674–678 laid siege to Constantinople]]. The Arab fleet was finally repulsed through the use of [[Greek fire]], and a thirty-years' truce was signed between the empire and the [[Umayyad Caliphate]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=61–62}}.</ref> However, the Anatolian raids continued unabated and accelerated the demise of classical urban culture, with the inhabitants of many cities either refortifying much smaller areas within the old city walls or relocating entirely to nearby fortresses.<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=102–114}}; {{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|p=47}}.</ref> Constantinople shrank substantially from 500,000 inhabitants to just 40,000–70,000, and, like other urban centres, it was partly ruralised. The city also lost the free grain shipments in 618, after Egypt fell first to the Persians and then to the Arabs, and public wheat distribution ceased.<ref>{{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=38–42, 47}}; {{Harvnb|Wickham|2009|p=260}}.</ref>
After John's death, Constantine VII's grandsons [[Basil II|Basil&nbsp;II]] and [[Constantine VIII]] ruled jointly for half a century, although the latter exercised no real power.{{sfn|Holmes|2008|p=268}} Their early reign was occupied by conflicts against two prominent generals, [[Bardas Skleros]] and [[Bardas Phokas the Younger|Bardas Phokas]], which ended in 989 after the former's death and the latter's submission, and a power struggle against the eunuch [[Basil Lekapenos|Basileios]], who was dismissed in 985.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=522–526|Magdalino|2002|2p=202|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=573–578}} Basil, who never married or had children, subsequently refused to delegate any authority: he sidelined the military establishment by taking personal command of the army and promoting officers loyal to him.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=526, 531|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=578–579|Holmes|2008|3p=269}} His reign witnessed [[Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria|the decades-long campaign against Bulgaria]], which ended in total Byzantine victory at the [[Battle of Kleidion]] in 1014.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=269|Shepard|2009b|2pp=526–29|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=579–582}} Diplomatic efforts, critical for this success,{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1p=529|Holmes|2008|2p=271}} also contributed to the [[Byzantine–Georgian treaty of 1022|annexation of several Georgian provinces]] in the 1020s and coexistence with the new [[Fatimid Caliphate]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=584|Holmes|2008|2pp=270–271|Magdalino|2002|3p=180}} When he died in 1025, Basil's empire stretched from the Danube and Sicily in the west to the [[Euphrates]] in the east; his swift expansion was unaccompanied by administrative reforms.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=531–536|Holmes|2008|2p=271}}


The void left by the disappearance of the old semi-autonomous civic institutions was filled by the system called [[Theme (Byzantine district)|''theme'']], which entailed dividing Asia Minor into "provinces" occupied by distinct armies that assumed civil authority and answered directly to the imperial administration. This system may have had its roots in certain ''ad hoc'' measures taken by Heraclius, but over the course of the 7th century it developed into an entirely new system of imperial governance.<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=208–215}}; {{Harvnb|Kaegi|2003|pp=236, 283}}.</ref> The massive cultural and institutional restructuring of the empire consequent on the loss of territory in the 7th century has been said to have caused a decisive break in east Mediterranean ''Romanness'', and that the Byzantine state is subsequently best understood as another successor state rather than a real continuation of the Roman Empire.<ref>{{Harvnb|Heather|2005|p=431}}.</ref>
[[File:The seizure of Edessa in Syria by the Byzantine army and the Arabic counterattack from the Chronicle of John Skylitzes.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|The seizure of [[Edessa]] (1031) by the Byzantines under [[George Maniakes]] and the counterattack by the [[Seljuk Turks]]|alt=Depiction of an army attacking a walled town]]


==== Late Heraclian dynasty ====
After Constantine VIII's death in 1028, his daughters, the empresses [[Zoe Porphyrogenita|Zoe]] ({{reign|1028|1050|link=no}}) and [[Theodora Porphyrogenita|Theodora]] ({{reign|1042|1056|link=no}}), held the keys to power: four emperors ([[Romanos III Argyros|Romanos III]], [[Michael IV the Paphlagonian|Michael IV]], [[Michael V Kalaphates|Michael V]], and [[Constantine IX Monomachos|Constantine IX]]) ruled only because of their connection to Zoe, while [[Michael VI Bringas|Michael VI]] ({{reign|1056|1057|link=no}}) was selected by Theodora.{{sfnm|Magdalino|2002|1pp=202–203|Holmes|2008|2pp=271–272|Angold|2009|3pp=587–588|Kaldellis|2023|4pp=588–589}} This political instability, regular budget deficits, a series of expensive military failures, and other problems connected to over-extension led to substantial issues in the empire;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=590, 593|Magdalino|2002|2pp=181–182|Angold|2009|3pp=587–598}} its strategic focus moved from maintaining its hegemony to prioritising defence.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=602}}
{{See also|Twenty Years' Anarchy}}
[[File:The concession of privileges mosaic (cropped).jpg|thumb|250px|[[Constantine IV]] and his retinue, mosaic in [[Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe]]. Constantine IV defeated the [[First Arab siege of Constantinople]].]]


The withdrawal of large numbers of troops from the Balkans to combat the Persians and then the Arabs in the east opened the door for the gradual southward expansion of Slavic peoples into the peninsula, and, as in Asia Minor, many cities shrank to small fortified settlements.<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=43–45, 66, 114–115}}</ref> In the 670s, the [[Bulgars]] were pushed south of the Danube by the arrival of the [[Khazars]]. In 680, Byzantine forces sent to disperse these new settlements were defeated.<ref name="Haldon 1990 66–67">{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=66–67}}.</ref>
The empire soon came under sustained assault on three fronts, from the [[Byzantine–Seljuk wars|Seljuk Turks in the east]], the [[Pechenegs|Pecheneg nomads]] in the north, and the [[Norman conquest of southern Italy|Normans in the west]]. The Byzantine army struggled to confront these enemies, who did not organise themselves as traditional states, and were thus untroubled by defeats in set-piece battles.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=272–273|Magdalino|2002|2p=182|Kaldellis|2023|3p=636}} In 1071 [[Bari]], the last remaining Byzantine settlement in Italy, was [[Siege of Bari|captured by the Normans]], while the Seljuks won a decisive victory at the [[Battle of Manzikert]], taking the emperor [[Romanos IV Diogenes]] prisoner.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=273|Magdalino|2002|2pp=184–185, 189}} The latter event sparked a decade-long civil war, and as a result the Seljuks took possession of Anatolia up to the [[Sea of Marmara]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=629–637|Angold|2009|2pp=609–610}}


In 681, [[Constantine IV]] signed a treaty with the Bulgar Khan [[Asparuh of Bulgaria|Asparukh]], and the [[First Bulgarian Empire|new Bulgarian state]] assumed sovereignty over several Slavic tribes that had previously, at least in name, recognised Byzantine rule.<ref name="Haldon 1990 66–67" /> In 687–688, the final Heraclian emperor, [[Justinian II]], led an expedition against the Slavs and Bulgarians and made significant gains, although the fact that he had to fight his way from [[Thrace]] to [[Macedonia (region)|Macedonia]] demonstrates the degree to which Byzantine power in the north Balkans had declined.<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=71}}.</ref>
=== 1081–1204: Komnenos and Angelos dynasties ===
{{further|Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Angelos dynasty}}
One prominent general, [[Alexios I Komnenos|Alexios&nbsp;I]], usurped the throne in 1081. In contrast to the prior turmoil, the three reigns of Alexios ({{reign|1081|1118}}), his son [[John II Komnenos|John&nbsp;II]] ({{reign|1118|1143|link=no}}), and his grandson [[Manuel I Komnenos|Manuel&nbsp;I]] ({{reign|1143|1180|link=no}}) lasted a century and [[Komnenian restoration|restored the empire's regional authority]] for the final time.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=273–274|Angold|2009|2p=611}} Alexios immediately faced the Normans under [[Robert Guiscard]] and [[Byzantine–Norman wars#First Norman invasion of the Balkans (1081–1085)|repelled them through warfare and diplomacy]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=639–642|Holmes|2008|2p=275|Magdalino|2002|3p=190}} He then targeted the Pechenegs and [[Battle of Levounion|decisively defeated them in 1091]] with help from the [[Cumans]], who were in turn defeated three years later.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=642–644|Holmes|2008|2p=275|Angold|2009|3pp=611–612}} Finally, looking to recover Asia Minor from the Seljuks, he approached [[Pope Urban II|Pope Urban&nbsp;II]] for help {{circa|1095}}. He did not anticipate the scale of western Christendom's response—the [[First Crusade]] led to the recapture of western Anatolia, although Alexios and its leaders soon fell out.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=275|Magdalino|2002|2p=190|Angold|2009|3pp=621–623}} The rest of his reign was spent [[Treaty of Devol|dealing with the Normans]] and Seljuks, establishing a new, loyal aristocracy to ensure stability, and carrying out fiscal and ecclesiastical reforms.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=274–275|Angold|2009|2pp=612–613, 619–621, 623–625|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=645–647, 659–663}}


Justinian II attempted to break the power of the urban aristocracy through severe taxation and the appointment of "outsiders" to administrative posts. He was driven from power in 695 and took shelter first with the Khazars and then with the [[Bulgarians]]. In 705, he returned to Constantinople with the armies of the Bulgarian Khan [[Tervel of Bulgaria|Tervel]], retook the throne and instituted a reign of terror against his enemies. With his final overthrow in 711, supported once more by the urban aristocracy, the Heraclian dynasty came to an end.<ref>{{Harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=70–78, 169–171}}; {{Harvnb|Haldon|2004|pp=216–217}}; {{Harvnb|Kountoura-Galake|1996|pp=62–75}}.</ref>
[[File:Comnenus mosaics Hagia Sophia.jpg|thumb|A [[mosaic]] from the [[Hagia Sophia]] of Constantinople (modern Istanbul), depicting [[Mary, mother of Jesus|Mary]] and [[Jesus]], flanked by [[John II Komnenos|John&nbsp;II Komnenos]] (left) and his wife [[Irene of Hungary]] (right), 12th century|alt=A mosaic depicting a haloed woman holding a baby, flanked by a man and woman, both crowned and haloed]]


==== Second Arab siege of Constantinople (717–718) and the Isaurian dynasty ====
Alexios' concentration of power in the hands of his [[Komnenos dynasty]] meant the most serious political threats came from within the imperial family—before his coronation, John&nbsp;II had to overcome [[Irene Doukaina|his mother Irene]] and [[Anna Komnene|his sister Anna]], and the primary threat during his reign was [[Isaac Komnenos (son of Alexios I)|his brother Isaac]].{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=274|Magdalino|2009|2pp=629–630}} John campaigned annually and extensively—he fought the Pechenegs in 1122, the [[Byzantine–Hungarian War (1127–1129)|Hungarians in the late 1120s]], and the Seljuks throughout his reign, waging [[Byzantine–Seljuk wars#Byzantine counter-attack: 1118–1180|large campaigns in Syria]] in his final years—but he did not achieve large territorial gains.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=275|Magdalino|2009|2pp=631–633|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=664–670}} In 1138, John raised the imperial standard over the Crusader [[Principality of Antioch]] to intimidate the city into allying with the Byzantines, but did not attack, fearing that it would provoke western Christendom to respond.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=669|Holmes|2008|2p=275}}
{{Further|Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty}}
[[File:ByzantineEmpire717+extrainfo+themes.svg|thumb|250px|The Byzantine Empire at the accession of [[Leo III the Isaurian|Leo III]], c.&nbsp;717. Striped indicates areas raided by the Umayyads.]]
[[File:Solidus-Leo III and Constantine V-sb1504.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gold ''solidus'' of [[Leo III the Isaurian|Leo III]] (left), and his son and heir, [[Constantine V]] (right)]]


In 717 the Umayyad Caliphate launched a [[siege of Constantinople (717–718)|siege on Constantinople]] which lasted for one year. However, the combination of [[Leo III the Isaurian]]'s military genius, the Byzantines' use of Greek fire, a cold winter in 717–718, and Byzantine diplomacy with the Khan Tervel of Bulgaria resulted in a Byzantine victory. After Leo III turned back the Muslim assault in 718, he addressed himself to the task of reorganising and consolidating the ''themes'' in Asia Minor. In 740 a major Byzantine victory took place at the [[Battle of Akroinon]] where the Byzantines destroyed the Umayyad army.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/22733550 |title=The Oxford dictionary of Byzantium |date=1991 |publisher=Oxford University Press |others=A. P. Kazhdan, Alice-Mary Maffry Talbot, Anthony Cutler, Timothy E. Gregory, Nancy Patterson Ševčenko |isbn=978-0-19-504652-6 |location=New York |oclc=22733550}}</ref>
Manuel&nbsp;I used his father's overflowing imperial treasury in pursuit of his ambitions, and also to secure the empire's position in an increasingly multilateral geopolitical landscape.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=670, 676–677|Magdalino|2009|2pp=644–646}} Through a combination of [[Byzantine diplomacy|diplomacy and bribery]], he cultivated a ring of allies and clients around the empire: the Turks of the [[Sultanate of Rum]], the [[Kingdom of Hungary (1000–1301)|Kingdom of Hungary]], the [[Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia|Cilician Armenians]], Balkan princes, Italian and Dalmatian cities, and most importantly Antioch and the [[Crusader States]], marrying [[Maria of Antioch|one of their princesses]] in 1161.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=678, 683–688|Holmes|2008|2pp=275–276}} Manuel averted the threat of war during the tumultuous passage of the [[Second Crusade]] through Byzantine territories in 1147, but the campaign's failure was blamed on the Byzantines by western contemporaries.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=679–681|Magdalino|2009|2pp=637–638}} He was less successful militarily: an invasion of [[Kingdom of Sicily|Sicily]] was decisively defeated by [[William I of Sicily|King William&nbsp;I]] in 1156, leading to tensions with [[Frederick Barbarossa]], the Holy Roman Emperor;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=682–683|Magdalino|2002|2p=194|Magdalino|2009|3pp=638–641}} two decades later, an invasion of Anatolia was resoundingly defeated at the [[Battle of Myriokephalon]].{{sfnm|Magdalino|2009|1pp=643–644|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=692–693}}


Constantine V won noteworthy victories in northern Syria and also thoroughly undermined Bulgarian strength.<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=67–68}}.</ref> In 746, profiting by the [[Third Fitna|unstable conditions]] in the Umayyad Caliphate, which was falling apart under [[Marwan II]], Constantine V invaded Syria and captured [[Marash|Germanikeia]], and the [[Battle of Keramaia]] resulted in a major Byzantine naval victory over the Umayyad fleet. Coupled with military defeats on other fronts of the caliphate and internal instability, Umayyad expansion came to an end.
[[File:Eugène Ferdinand Victor Delacroix 012.jpg|thumb|[[Entry of the Crusaders in Constantinople|''The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople'']], by [[Eugène Delacroix]] (1840)|alt=A painting of an army marching into a city gate with much smoke in the background]]


==== Religious dispute over iconoclasm ====
Manuel's death left the empire rudderless and it soon came under intense pressure.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=695}} His son [[Alexios II Komnenos|Alexios&nbsp;II]] was too young to rule, and his troubled regency was overthrown by his uncle [[Andronikos I Komnenos]]: he was replaced by [[Isaac II Angelos|Isaac&nbsp;II]] in 1185.{{sfnm|Magdalino|2002|1p=194|Holmes|2008|2p=276}} Centrifugal forces swirled at the borders as ambitious rulers seized their chance: Hungary and the Turks captured Byzantine territories, [[Isaac Komnenos of Cyprus|an exiled Komnenian prince]] seized Cyprus; and most injuriously, [[Uprising of Asen and Peter|a revolt in 1185]] caused the foundation of a [[Second Bulgarian Empire|resurrected Bulgarian state]].{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=276|Magdalino|2002|2pp=194–195|Magdalino|2009|3p=655}} Relations with the West deteriorated further after Constantinople allied with [[Saladin]], the vanquisher of the [[Third Crusade]], whose leaders also fought against Byzantium as they passed through its territory.{{sfnm|Magdalino|2002|1pp=195–196|Magdalino|2009|2pp=648–651|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=706–710}} In 1195, Isaac&nbsp;II was deposed by his brother [[Alexios III Angelos|Alexios&nbsp;III]]; this quarrel proved fatal.{{sfn|Holmes|2008|p=276}}
{{Main|Byzantine iconoclasm}}
[[File:Irenekirken.jpg|thumb|left|A Simple Cross: An example of [[Iconoclasm|Iconoclast]] art in the [[Hagia Irene]] Church in Istanbul.]]


The 8th and early 9th centuries were also dominated by controversy and religious division over [[Iconoclasm]], which was the main political issue in the empire for over a century. [[Icon]]s (here meaning all forms of religious imagery) were banned by Leo and Constantine from around 730, leading to revolts by [[Iconodulism|iconodules]] (supporters of icons) throughout the empire. After the efforts of Empress [[Irene of Athens|Irene]], the [[Second Council of Nicaea]] met in 787 and affirmed that icons could be venerated but not worshipped. Irene is said to have endeavoured to negotiate a marriage between herself and [[Charlemagne]], but according to [[Theophanes the Confessor]] the scheme was frustrated by [[Aetios (eunuch)|Aetios]], one of her advisors.<ref name="G89">{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=167–170}}; {{Harvnb|Garland|1999|p=89}}.</ref>
The [[Fourth Crusade]] was originally intended to target [[Ayyubid Sultanate|Egypt]], but amid strategic difficulties, Isaac&nbsp;II's son [[Alexios IV Angelos|Alexios Angelos]] convinced the crusaders to restore his father to the throne in exchange for a huge tribute.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=718–720|Magdalino|2009|2pp=651–652}} They [[Siege of Constantinople (1203)|attacked Constantinople in 1203]], reinstating Isaac&nbsp;II and his son to the throne. The new rulers swiftly grew unpopular and were deposed by [[Alexios V Doukas|Alexios V]], an event used by the crusaders as a pretext to [[Sack of Constantinople|sack the city in April 1204]], ransacking the wealth it had accumulated over nine centuries.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=720–724|Magdalino|2009|2pp=652–653}}


In the early 9th century, [[Leo V the Armenian|Leo V]] reintroduced the policy of iconoclasm, but in 843 Empress [[Theodora (wife of Theophilos)|Theodora]] restored the veneration of icons with the help of [[Methodios I of Constantinople|Patriarch Methodios]].<ref name="P11">{{Harvnb|Parry|1996|pp=11–15}}.</ref> Iconoclasm played a part in the further alienation of East from West, which worsened during the so-called [[Photian schism]] when [[Pope Nicholas I]] challenged the elevation of [[Photios I of Constantinople|Photios]] to the patriarchate.<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=267}}.</ref>
=== 1204–1453: Palaiologos dynasty ===
{{Further|Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty}}
[[File:LatinEmpire2.png|thumb|upright=1.15|The partition of the empire following the [[Fourth Crusade]], {{Circa|1204}}{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=280|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=733–734|Reinert|2002|3pp=250–253|Angold|2009b|4p=731}}|alt=A map showing the competing states after the Fourth Crusade.]]


=== Macedonian dynasty and resurgence (867–1025) ===
Byzantine territories fragmented into competing political entities. The crusaders crowned [[Baldwin I, Latin Emperor|Baldwin&nbsp;I]] as the ruler of a new [[Latin Empire]] in Constantinople; it soon suffered [[Battle of Adrianople (1205)|a crushing defeat]] against the Bulgarians in 1205. It also failed to expand west or east, where three Greek successor states had formed: the [[Empire of Nicaea]] and the [[Empire of Trebizond]] in Asia Minor, and the [[Despotate of Epirus]] on the Adriatic. The Venetians acquired many ports and islands, and the [[Principality of Achaea]] emerged in southern Greece.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=280|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=733–734|Reinert|2002|3pp=250–253|Angold|2009b|4p=731}} Trebizond [[Siege of Sinope|lost]] the key port of [[Sinop, Turkey|Sinope]] in 1214 and thereafter was unable to affect matters away from the southeastern Black Sea.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=755–758|Angold|2009b|2p=737}} For a time, it seemed that Epirus was the one most likely to reclaim Constantinople from the Latins, and its ruler [[Theodore Komnenos Doukas|Theodore Doukas]] crowned himself emperor, but he suffered a critical defeat at the [[Battle of Klokotnitsa]] in 1230, and Epirote power waned.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=283|Reinert|2002|2p=254|Angold|2009b|3pp=737–738|Kaldellis|2023|4pp=766–770}}
{{See also|Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty}}
[[File:ByzantineEmpire867AD4-en.svg|thumb|upright=1.25|The Byzantine Empire, {{Circa|867}}]]


The accession of [[Basil I]] to the throne in 867 marks the beginning of the [[Macedonian dynasty]], which ruled for 150 years. This dynasty included some of the ablest emperors in Byzantium's history, and [[Macedonian Renaissance|the period is one of revival]]. The empire moved from defending against external enemies to reconquest of territories.<ref name="Browning-1992-95">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=95}}.</ref> The Macedonian dynasty was characterised by a cultural revival in spheres such as philosophy and the arts. There was a conscious effort to restore the brilliance of the period before the [[Slavic migrations to the Balkans|Slavic]] and subsequent Arab invasions, and the Macedonian era has been dubbed the "Golden Age" of Byzantium.<ref name="Browning-1992-95" /> Although the empire was significantly smaller than during the reign of Justinian I, it had regained much strength, as the remaining territories were less geographically dispersed and more politically, economically, and culturally integrated.
Nicaea, ruled by the [[Laskaris|Laskarid dynasty]] and composed of a mixture of Byzantine refugees and native Greeks, blocked the Latins and the Seljuks of Rum from expanding east and west respectively.{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1p=253|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=760–762}} [[John III Doukas Vatatzes|John&nbsp;III]] ({{reign|1221|1254}}) was a very capable emperor.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=771|Laiou|2008|2pp=282–283}} His [[protectionist]] economic policies strongly encouraged Nicaean [[Autarky|self-sufficiency]],{{sfnm|Angold|2009b|1p=740|Laiou|2008|2pp=282–283|Kaldellis|2023|3p=772}} and he made many diplomatic treaties, especially after [[Mongol Empire|Mongol]] armies [[Mongol invasion of Bulgaria and Serbia|ravaged Bulgaria]] and [[Battle of Köse Dağ|defeated Rum]] between 1237 and 1243. This chaos was an opportunity for John, and he fought many successful campaigns against the states disrupted by the [[Mongol invasions]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=774–781|Reinert|2002|2p=254}} Soon after his death, [[John IV Laskaris|his grandson]] was usurped by [[Michael VIII Palaiologos|Michael VIII]], founder of the [[Palaiologos|Palaiologos dynasty]], who [[Reconquest of Constantinople|recaptured Constantinople]] in 1261.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=283|Reinert|2002|2p=254}}


==== Wars against the Abbasids ====
Michael desired to restore the empire's glory through a rebuilding programme in Constantinople, clever diplomatic alliances, and expansionist wars in Europe.{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1pp=256–257|Laiou|2008|2p=286}} He staved off the threatening [[Charles I of Anjou]] first by recognising papal primacy and certain Catholic doctrines at the 1274 [[Second Council of Lyon]], and then by aiding the [[Sicilian Vespers]] against Charles in 1282.{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1pp=257–258|Laiou|2009|2pp=803–804}} However, his religious concessions were despised by most of the populace, and were repudiated by his successor [[Andronikos II Palaiologos|Andronikos&nbsp;II]] ({{reign|1282|1328}}).{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1pp=258|Laiou|2008|2p=287}} He and his grandson [[Andronikos III Palaiologos|Andronikos&nbsp;III]] ({{reign|1328|1341}}) led several campaigns to restore imperial influence, succeeding in Epirus and Thessaly. They also made several critical mistakes, including dismissing the fleet in 1285, hiring the mercenary [[Catalan Company]], who turned on the Byzantines, in the 1300s, and fighting each other between 1320 and 1328.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1pp=287–288|Reinert|2002|2pp=260–263|Kaldellis|2023|3p=847}} A disastrous civil war between 1341 and 1354 caused long-term economic difficulties, while the [[Ottoman Turks]] gradually expanded.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1pp=289–290|Reinert|2002|2pp=265–268}}
{{Main|Arab–Byzantine wars}}


[[File:Leo Phokas defeats Hambdan at Adrassos.png|thumb|upright=1.15|The general [[Leo Phokas the Younger|Leo Phokas]] defeats the [[Hamdanid dynasty|Hamdanid]] [[Emirate of Aleppo]] at [[Battle of Andrassos|Andrassos]] in 960, from the ''[[Madrid Skylitzes]]'']]
[[File:Le siège de Constantinople (1453) by Jean Le Tavernier after 1455.jpg|thumb|upright|The [[Fall of Constantinople|siege of Constantinople]] in 1453, depicted in a 15th-century French miniature|alt=A painting of a siege of a city]]
Taking advantage of the empire's weakness after the [[Revolt of Thomas the Slav]] in the early 820s, the Arabs re-emerged and [[Emirate of Crete|captured Crete]]. They also successfully attacked Sicily, but in 863 general [[Petronas (general)|Petronas]] gained a decisive victory at the [[Battle of Lalakaon]] against [[Umar al-Aqta]], the [[emir]] of Melitene ([[Malatya]]). Under the leadership of Emperor [[Krum]], the Bulgarian threat also re-emerged, but in 815–816 Krum's son, [[Omurtag of Bulgaria|Omurtag]], signed a [[Byzantine–Bulgarian treaty of 815|peace treaty]] with [[Leo V the Armenian|Leo V]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=432–433}}.</ref>


In the 830s the [[Abbasid Caliphate]] started military excursions culminating with a victory in the [[Sack of Amorium]]. The Byzantines then counter-attacked and [[Sack of Damietta (853)|sacked Damietta]] in Egypt. Later the Abbasid Caliphate responded by sending their troops into Anatolia again, sacking and marauding until they were eventually annihilated by the Byzantines at the [[Battle of Lalakaon]] in 863.
The diminished and weak Byzantine state only survived for another century through effective diplomacy and fortunately timed external events.{{sfn|Laiou|2008|p=291}} The Ottomans gradually subjugated Anatolia and simultaneously expanded into Europe from 1354, taking [[Philippopolis (Thrace)|Philippopolis]] in 1363, [[Adrianopolis]] in 1369, and [[Thessalonica]] in 1387.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=291|Reinert|2002|2pp=268–269}} Emperors were crowned and deposed at the whim of the Venetians, Genoese, and Ottomans.{{sfn|Laiou|2009|p=829}} After [[Manuel II Palaiologos|Manuel II]] ({{reign|1391|1425}}) refused to pay homage to Sultan [[Bayezid I]] in 1394, [[Siege of Constantinople (1394–1402)|Constantinople was besieged]] until the rampaging warlord [[Timur]] decisively [[Battle of Ankara|defeated Bayezid]] in 1402, with the city perilously close to surrender.{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1pp=273–274|Laiou|2009|2pp=831–832|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=887–889}}


In the early years of [[Basil I]]'s reign, Arab raids on the coasts of Dalmatia and the [[siege of Ragusa (866–868)]] were defeated, and the region once again came under secure Byzantine control. This enabled Byzantine missionaries to penetrate to the interior and [[Christianization of the Serbs|convert the Serbs]] and the principalities of modern-day [[Herzegovina]] and [[Montenegro]] to Christianity.<ref name="Browning-1992-96">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=96}}.</ref>
Manuel II oversaw two decades of peace while the [[Ottoman Interregnum|Ottomans convulsed in civil war]].{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1pp=274–276|Laiou|2008|2p=292|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=892–894}} In 1421, his unsuccessful backing of the claimant [[Mustafa Çelebi]] led to a [[Siege of Constantinople (1422)|renewed Turkish assault]].{{sfn|Reinert|2002|p=276}} Although [[John VIII Palaiologos|John VIII]] ({{reign|1425|1448}}) reconciled with the Catholic West at the [[Council of Florence]], his empire steadily diminished.{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1pp=278–279|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=903–908}} In 1452, Sultan [[Mehmed II]] resolved to capture Constantinople, and laid siege early the following year. On 29 May 1453, [[Fall of Constantinople|the city was captured]], the last emperor, [[Constantine XI Palaiologos|Constantine XI]], died in battle, and the Byzantine Empire ended.{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1pp=280–283|Laiou|2008|2pp=292–293|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=910–914}}


By contrast, the Byzantine position in [[Southern Italy]] was gradually consolidated; by 873 [[Bari]] was once again under Byzantine rule, and most of Southern Italy remained in the empire for the next 200 years.<ref name=Browning-1992-96/><ref>{{Harvnb|Karlin-Heyer|1967|p=24}}</ref> On the more important eastern front, the empire rebuilt its defences and went on the offensive. The [[Paulicianism|Paulicians]] were defeated at the [[Battle of Bathys Ryax]] and their capital of Tephrike ([[Divriği|Divrigi]]) taken, while the offensive against the Abbasid Caliphate began with the recapture of [[Samsat|Samosata]].<ref name=Browning-1992-96/>
== Structures of the state ==
{{Multiple image
| footer            =
| align            = right
| direction        = vertical
| image1            = Byzantine Empire Themata-750-en.svg
| width1            = 220
| alt1              = A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colours in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (green), Anatolic (brown), Bucellarians (orange) and Armeniacs (purple). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Samos, Crete and Cyprus.
| caption1          = The ''themes'' of Asia Minor, {{Circa|750}}
| image2            = Byzantine Empire Themata-950-en.svg
| width2            = 220
| alt2              = A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colours in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Samos (dark grey), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (dark grey), Anatolic and Seleucia (brown), Bucellarians (orange), Paphlagonia (navy blue), Cappadocia (green), Charsianon (pink), Armeniacs (purple), Lycandus and Mesopotamia (brown), Sebastea (blue), Koloneia (dark green) and Chaldia (light blue). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Crete and Cyprus.
| caption2          = The ''themes'' of Asia Minor, {{Circa|950|lk=off}}
}}


[[File:Paris psaulter gr139 fol1v.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9|10th century military successes were coupled with a major cultural revival, the so-called [[Macedonian Renaissance]]. Miniature from the [[Paris Psalter]], an example of Hellenistic-influenced art.]]
=== Governance ===
{{See also|Subdivisions of the Byzantine Empire}}


Under Basil's son and successor, [[Leo VI the Wise]], the gains in the east against the enfeebled Abbasid Caliphate continued. [[Siege of Taormina (902)|Sicily was lost]] to the Arabs in 902, and in 904 [[Thessaloniki]], the empire's second city, [[Sack of Thessalonica (904)|was sacked]] by an Arab fleet. The naval weakness of the empire was rectified. Despite this revenge, the Byzantines were still unable to strike a decisive blow against the Muslims, who inflicted a crushing defeat on the imperial forces when they attempted to regain [[Emirate of Crete|Crete]] in 911.<ref name="B101">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=101}}.</ref>
Diocletian and Constantine's 4th-century reforms reorganised the empire's provinces into overarching [[Roman diocese|Dioceses]] and then into [[Praetorian prefecture]]s, separating the army from the civil administration.{{sfnm|Louth|2005|1pp=306–308|Treadgold|1997b|2pp=82–83}} The central government, led by the [[Roman emperor|emperor]] from the time of the earlier [[pax romana]] and into the late [[Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty|Palaiologan era]], typically focused on the military, foreign relations, administering the law, and collecting taxes.{{sfnm|Browning|1992|1p=98|Stewart|2022|2pp=10-11}} A person usually ascended into the position of emperor [[Coronation of the Byzantine emperor|after a ceremony]]. The [[Byzantine senate|senate]] evolved into a ceremonial body within the imperial court.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=35|Howard-Johnston|2024|2p=8|Browning|1992|3p=98}}


The death of the Bulgarian Emperor [[Simeon I of Bulgaria|Simeon I]] in 927 severely weakened the Bulgarians, allowing the Byzantines to concentrate on the eastern front.<ref name="Browning-1992-107">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=107}}.</ref> [[Malatya|Melitene]] was permanently recaptured in 934, and in 943 the famous general [[John Kourkouas]] continued the offensive in Mesopotamia with some noteworthy victories, culminating in the reconquest of [[Edessa]]. Kourkouas was especially celebrated for returning to Constantinople the venerated [[Image of Edessa|Mandylion]], a relic purportedly imprinted with a portrait of Jesus.<ref name="Browning-1992-108">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=108}}.</ref>
Cities had been a collection of self-governing communities with central government and church representatives from the 5th century.{{sfnm|Browning|1992|1p=98|Kaldellis|2023|2p=185}} However, constant warfare significantly altered this, as regular raids and ongoing conflict led to power centralising due to the empire's fight for survival.{{sfnm|Browning|1992|1p=98|Howard-Johnston|2024|2p=67|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=397, 407–409}} After the 7th century, the prefectures were abandoned, and in the 9th century, the provinces were divided into administrative units called [[Theme (Byzantine district)|''themes'' (or ''themata'')]], governed solely by a military commander (''[[strategos]]'').{{sfnm|Louth|2005|1p=303|Treadgold|1997b|2pp=430–431|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=418, 421}}


The soldier-emperors [[Nikephoros II Phokas]] ({{Reign|963|969}}) and [[John I Tzimiskes]] (969–976) expanded the empire well into Syria, defeating the emirs of northwest [[Iraq]]. Nikephoros [[Sack of Aleppo (962)|took Aleppo]] in 962, and the Arabs were decisively expelled from Crete in 963. The recapture of Crete in the [[siege of Chandax]] put an end to Arab raids in the Aegean, allowing mainland Greece to flourish again. [[Cyprus]] was permanently retaken in 965, and the successes of Nikephoros culminated in 969 with the [[siege of Antioch (968–969)|siege of Antioch]] and its recapture, which he incorporated as a province of the empire.<ref name="Browning-1992-112">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=112}}.</ref> His successor John Tzimiskes recaptured Damascus, [[Beirut]], [[Acre, Israel|Acre]], [[Sidon]], [[Caesarea Maritima|Caesarea]] and [[Tiberias]], putting Byzantine armies within striking distance of Jerusalem, although the Muslim power centres in Iraq and Egypt were left untouched.<ref name="Browning-1992-113">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=113}}.</ref> After much campaigning in the north, the last Arab threat to Byzantium, the rich province of Sicily, was targeted in 1025 by [[Basil II]], who died before the expedition could be completed. By that time the empire stretched from the straits of [[Messina]] to the [[Euphrates]] and from the Danube to Syria.<ref name="Browning-1992-116">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=116}}.</ref>
=== Law ===
{{Main|Byzantine law}}


==== Wars against the Bulgarian Empire ====
Theodosius II ({{reign|408|450|link=no}}) formalised [[Roman law]] by appointing five jurists as principal authorities and compiling legislation issued since Constantine's reign into the [[Codex Theodosianus]].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|Stein|1999|Kaiser|2015|1p=168|3p=120|2pp=14, 16, 28}} This process culminated in the ''[[Corpus Juris Civilis]]'' under Justinian&nbsp;I ({{reign|527|565|link=no}}), who commissioned a complete standardisation of imperial decrees since Hadrian's time and resolved conflicting legal opinions of the jurists.{{sfnm|Gregory|2010|Stein|1999|1p=135|2pp=33–35|Dingledy|2019|3pp=2–14|Kaiser|2015|4pp=123–126}} The result became the definitive legal authority. This body of law covered [[Civil law (legal system)|civil matters]] and also [[public law]], including imperial power and administrative organisation.{{sfnm|Stein|1999|1p=8|2a1=Merryman|2a2=Pérez-Perdomo|2y=2007|2p=21}} After 534, Justinian issued the [[Novellae Constitutiones|Novellae (New Laws)]] in Greek, which marked a transition from Roman to Byzantine law. Legal historian Bernard Stolte distinguishes Roman law as this because Western Europe inherited law through the Latin texts of the ''Corpus Juris Civilis'' only.{{sfnm|Stolte|2015|1pp=356, 370|Stolte|2018|2pp=231–232}}
{{Further|Byzantine–Bulgarian wars|Byzantine–Bulgarian war of 894–896|Byzantine–Bulgarian war of 913–927}}
[[File:Basilios II.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9|Emperor [[Basil II]] ({{Reign|976|1025}})]]
[[File:Map Byzantine Empire 1025-en.svg|thumb|upright=1.15|The extent of the empire under [[Basil II]]]]


The traditional struggle with the [[Holy See|See of Rome]] continued through the Macedonian period, spurred by the question of religious supremacy over the [[Christianization of Bulgaria|newly Christianised]] state of Bulgaria.<ref name="Browning-1992-95" /> Ending eighty years of peace between the two states, the powerful Bulgarian [[Tsar]] [[Simeon I of Bulgaria|Simeon I]] invaded in 894 but was pushed back by the Byzantines, who used their fleet to sail up the [[Black Sea]] to attack the Bulgarian rear, enlisting the support of the [[Hungarians]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=100}}.</ref> The Byzantines were defeated at the [[Battle of Boulgarophygon]] in 896, however, and agreed to pay annual subsidies to the Bulgarians.<ref name="B101" />
Zachary Chitwood argues that the ''Corpus Juris Civilis'' was largely inaccessible in Latin, particularly in the provinces.{{sfn|Chitwood|2017|p=23}} Following the 7th-century Arab conquests, people began questioning the development and application of law, leading to stronger ties between law and Christianity.{{sfn|Chitwood|2017|p=185}} This context influenced Leo&nbsp;III ({{Reign|717|741|link=no}}) to develop the ''[[Ecloga]]'', which placed an emphasis on humanity.{{sfnm|Chitwood|2017|1p=185|Nicol|1988|2pp=23–24|2p=65}} The Ecloga inspired practical legal texts like the ''Farmers' Law, Seamen's Law,'' and ''Soldiers' Law'', which Chitwood suggests were used daily in the provinces as companions to the ''Corpus Juris Civilis''.{{sfn|Chitwood|2017|pp=23, 132, 364}} During the Macedonian dynasty, efforts to reform law began with the publication of the ''Procheiron'' and the ''Eisagoge'', which aimed to define the emperor's power under prevailing laws, and to replace the ''Ecloga'' due to its association with [[iconoclasm]].{{sfnm|Browning|1992|Kaldellis|2023|Chitwood|2017|1p=97|2p=529|3pp=25–32, 44}} Leo VI ({{Reign|886|912|link=no}}) completed a [[Codification (law)|complete codification]] of Roman law in Greek through the ''[[Basilika]]'', a work of 60 books which became the foundation of Byzantine law.{{sfnm|Browning|1992|Chitwood|2017|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=97–98|2pp=32–35|3p=529}} In 1345, Constantine Harmenopoulos compiled the ''[[Constantine Harmenopoulos|Hexabiblos]]'', a six-volume law book derived from various Byzantine legal sources.{{sfn|Stein|1999|p=35}}


[[Leo VI the Wise|Leo the Wise]] died in 912, and hostilities resumed as Simeon marched to Constantinople at the head of a large army.<ref>{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=102–103}}.</ref> Although the walls of the city were impregnable, the Byzantine administration was in disarray and Simeon was invited into the city, where he was granted the crown of ''basileus'' (emperor) of Bulgaria and had the young Emperor [[Constantine VII]] marry one of his daughters. When a revolt in Constantinople halted his dynastic project, he again invaded Thrace and conquered [[Edirne|Adrianople]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=103–105}}.</ref> The empire now faced the problem of a powerful Christian state within a few days' marching distance from Constantinople,<ref name="Browning-1992-95" /> as well as having to fight on two fronts.<ref name="B101" />
=== Christianity and the Church ===
{{Main|Christianity as the Roman state religion}}


A great imperial expedition under [[Leo Phokas the Elder|Leo Phocas]] and [[Romanos I Lekapenos]] ended with another crushing Byzantine defeat at the [[Battle of Achelous (917)|Battle of Achelous]] in 917, and the following year the Bulgarians were free to ravage northern Greece. Adrianople was plundered again in 923, and a Bulgarian army laid siege to Constantinople in 924. Simeon died suddenly in 927, however, and Bulgarian power collapsed with him. Bulgaria and Byzantium entered a long period of peaceful relations, and the empire was free to concentrate on the eastern front against the Muslims.<ref>{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=106–107}}.</ref> In 968, Bulgaria was overrun by the [[Rus' people|Rus']] under [[Sviatoslav I]], but three years later, [[John I Tzimiskes]] [[Siege of Dorostolon|defeated the Rus']] and re-incorporated eastern Bulgaria into the Byzantine Empire.<ref>{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=112–113}}.</ref>
{{See also|History of Christianity|History of the Eastern Orthodox Church#Byzantine period|History of the Jews in the Byzantine Empire}}


Bulgarian resistance revived under the rule of the [[Cometopuli dynasty]], but Emperor [[Basil II]] ({{Reign|976|1025}}) made the submission of the Bulgarians his primary goal.<ref name="B115">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=115}}.</ref> Basil's first expedition against Bulgaria, however, resulted in a defeat at the [[Battle of the Gates of Trajan|Gates of Trajan]]. For the next few years, the emperor was preoccupied with internal revolts in Anatolia, while the Bulgarians expanded their realm in the Balkans. The war dragged on for nearly twenty years. The Byzantine victories of [[Battle of Spercheios|Spercheios]] and [[Battle of Skopje|Skopje]] decisively weakened the Bulgarian army, and in annual campaigns Basil methodically reduced the Bulgarian strongholds.<ref name="B115" /> At the [[Battle of Kleidion]] in 1014 the Bulgarians were annihilated: their army was captured, and it is said that 99 out of every 100 men were blinded, with the hundredth man left with one eye so he could lead his compatriots home. When Tsar [[Samuel of Bulgaria|Samuil]] saw the broken remains of his once formidable army, he died of shock. By 1018, the last Bulgarian strongholds had surrendered, and the country became part of the empire.<ref name="B115" /> This victory restored the Danube frontier, which had not been held since the days of the Emperor Heraclius.<ref name="Browning-1992-116" />
Christianity, bolstered by [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]]'s support, began shaping all aspects of life in the early Byzantine Empire.{{sfnm|Papaconstantinou|2016|1p=xxxii|Cameron|2016|2p=31|Cameron|2006b|3pp=544-551|Drake|2007|4pp=418, 422|Greatrex|2008|5p=236}} Despite the transition, the historian [[Anthony Kaldellis]] views Christianity as "bringing no economic, social, or political changes to the state other than being more deeply integrated into it".{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=141, 186, 342}} When the Roman state in the West collapsed politically, cultural differences began to divide the Christian churches of the East and West.{{sfnm|Brown|1976|1p=8|Löhr|2007|2p=9}} Internal disputes within the Eastern churches led to the migration of monastic communities to Rome, exacerbating tensions between Rome and Constantinople.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=390|Cameron|2017|2at=A United Church, chapter 1}} These disputes,{{efn|[[Arianism]], one of the first major controversies, shook the empire until it was addressed by the [[Nicene Creed]].{{sfnm|1a1=Berndt|1a2=Steinacher|1y=2014|1pp=1-2, 8-19|2a1=Löhr|2y=2007|2p=14}} Other controversies persisted, leading to schisms, such as debates on the fundamental definitions of Christ's nature at the [[Council of Chalcedon]] in 451.{{sfnm|Sabo|2018|1pp=vi, 9|Löhr|2007|2pp=14–23}}}} particularly in Egypt and the eastern Mediterranean, eventually split the church into three branches: [[Chalcedonian Christianity|Chalcedonian]], Monophysite (Coptic), and [[Church of the East|Nestorian]].{{sfnm|Adams|2021|1p=366|Micheau|2006|2pp=373, 375}} The Chalcedonian group maintained dominance within the empire's territories, while the Monophysite and Nestorian branches largely fell under Muslim rule in the 7th century.{{sfn|Micheau|2006|pp=373-374, 376}}


==== Relations with the Kievan Rus' ====
Eastern patriarchs frequently sought the Papacy's mediation in doctrinal and practical matters, but the pope's authority was not universally acknowledged, even in nearby regions like Northern Italy.{{sfnm|Nicholson|1960|1pp=54, 60|2a1=Casiday| 2a2=Norris|2y=2007a|2p=3}} By 600, the Slavic settlement of the Balkans disrupted communication between Rome and Constantinople, further widening the divide.{{Sfnm|Louth|2008|1p=47|Kolbaba|2008|2pp=214-215}} The Arab and Lombard invasions, and the increased [[Franks|Frankish]] presence, deepened this estrangement and intensified disputes over jurisdiction and authority between the two spiritual centres.{{Sfn|Kolbaba|2008|pp=213–215, 218-221}} Differences in ritual and theology, such as the use of [[Azymite|unleavened bread]] and the [[Filioque|Filioque clause]], as well as divergences in ecclesiology—[[plenitudo potestatis]] versus the authority of [[Ecumenical Councils]]—and issues of mutual respect, contributed to the separation of Western Christianity from Eastern Christianity.{{Sfnm|Meyendorff|1979|1pp=95,97 101|Kolbaba|2008|2p=223}} This separation began by 597 and culminated in 1054 during the [[East–West Schism]].{{Sfnm|Brown|2008|1p=13|Kolbaba|2008|2p=223}}
[[File:Царьград.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|[[Rus' people|Rus']] under the walls of Constantinople (860)]]
[[File:Skylitzis Chronicle VARANGIAN GUARD.jpg|thumb|250px|Varangian Guardsmen, an illumination from the [[John Skylitzes|Skylitzis Chronicle]]]]


Between 850 and 1100, the empire developed a mixed relationship with the [[Kievan Rus']], which had emerged to the north across the Black Sea.<ref name="Browning-1992-114-115" /> This relationship had long-lasting repercussions in the history of the [[East Slavs]], and the empire quickly became the main [[Route from the Varangians to the Greeks|trading and cultural partner]] for [[Kyiv|Kiev]]. The Rus' launched their first [[Siege of Constantinople (860)|attack against Constantinople]] in 860, pillaging the suburbs of the city. In 941, [[Rus'–Byzantine War (941)|they appeared on the Asian shore]] of the Bosphorus, but this time they were crushed, an indication of the improvements in the Byzantine military position after 907, when [[Rus'–Byzantine Treaty (907)|only diplomacy had been able to push back the invaders]]. [[Basil II]] could not ignore the emerging power of the Rus', and following the example of his predecessors he used religion as a means for achieving political purposes.<ref name="Cameron 2009 77">{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=77}}.</ref> Rus'–Byzantine relations became closer following the marriage of [[Anna Porphyrogenita|Anna Porphyrogeneta]] to [[Vladimir the Great]] in 988, and the subsequent [[Christianization of Kievan Rus'|Christianisation of the Rus']].<ref name="Browning-1992-114-115">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=114–115}}.</ref> Byzantine priests, architects, and artists were invited to work on numerous cathedrals and churches around Rus', expanding Byzantine cultural influence even further, while numerous Rus' served in the Byzantine army as mercenaries, most notably as the famous [[Varangian Guard]].<ref name="Browning-1992-114-115" />
== Warfare ==


Even after the Christianisation of the Rus', however, relations were not always friendly. The most serious conflict between the two powers was an [[Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria|invasion of Bulgaria in 968]], but several Rus' raiding expeditions against the Byzantine cities of the Black Sea coast and Constantinople are also recorded. Although most were repulsed, they were often followed by treaties that were generally favourable to the Rus', such as the one concluded at the end of [[Rus'–Byzantine War (1043)|the war of 1043]], during which the Rus' indicated their ambitions to compete with the Byzantines as an independent power.<ref name="Cameron 2009 77" />
===Military evolution===
{{Main|Eastern Roman army|Byzantine army|Byzantine navy}}


==== Campaigns in the Caucasus ====
In the late 6th century, following Justinian I's wars, seven mobile [[field armies]] called ''[[comitatenses]]'', numbering around 150,000 troops, were deployed around the empire; they remained the finest armies in Europe.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1995|1pp=63–64, 206|Haldon|1999|2p=67}} They were aided by twenty-five frontier garrisons of approximately 195,000 lower-quality ''[[limitanei]]'' troops.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1995|1pp=63, 204|Haldon|1999|2p=67|Decker|2013|3p=71}} Additional troops included [[Foederati|subsidised allied forces]] and [[imperial guard|imperial guard units]] like the ''[[Scholae Palatinae]]''.{{sfn|Haldon|1999|p=68}} Naval forces were limited: [[flotilla]]s were based at key locations, while 30,000 oarsmen were assembled to row 500, mostly requisitioned, [[Maritime transport|transports]] to support the [[Vandalic War]] in Africa in 533.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1995|1pp=63–64|Haldon|1999|2pp=68–69|Haldon|2008b|3p=554}}
{{Main|Byzantine–Georgian wars|Byzantine–Seljuk wars}}


Between 1021 and 1022, following years of tensions, Basil II led a series of victorious campaigns against the [[Kingdom of Georgia]], resulting in the annexation of several Georgian provinces to the empire. Basil's successors also annexed [[Bagratid Armenia]] in 1045. Importantly, both Georgia and Armenia were significantly weakened by the Byzantine administration's policy of heavy taxation and abolishing of the levy. The weakening of Georgia and Armenia played a significant role in the Byzantine [[Battle of Manzikert|defeat at Manzikert]] in 1071.<ref name="RappCrego2018">{{Cite book |last=Cyril Toumanoff |title=Languages and Cultures of Eastern Christianity: Georgian |date=31 October 2018 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-351-92326-2 |editor-last=Stephen H. Rapp |pages=62 |chapter=Caucasia and Byzantium |editor-last2=Paul Crego |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rH10DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT62 |access-date=30 December 2018 |archive-date=27 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727162836/https://books.google.com/books?id=rH10DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT62 |url-status=live }}</ref>
The losses suffered in the 7th-century [[Early Muslim conquests|Arab conquests]] led to fundamental changes.{{sfnm|Haldon|1999|1p=74|Decker|2013|2p=74}} The field armies were withdrawn into the core Anatolian territories and assigned to settle in specific districts, which became known as ''themata'' and eventually replaced the [[Roman province#Late imperial period|old provinces]].{{sfnm|Treadgold|1995|1p=23|Haldon|2008b|2pp=554–555}} The thematic armies, supported by the proceeds of their districts, came to resemble a provincial [[militia]] with a small professional core, aided by foreign mercenaries and imperial regiments at Constantinople.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1pp=555–556|Kaldellis|2021a|2p=463}} To defend against [[Early Caliphate navy|its new Muslim enemy]], the navy was similarly reorganised into several provincialised fleets.{{sfnm|Haldon|1999|1p=74|Haldon|2008b|2p=559}} It became the dominant power in the eastern Mediterranean, with [[dromon]]s equipped with [[Greek fire]] proving crucial on several occasions.{{sfnm|Decker|2013|1pp=207–208, 222–224|Kaldellis|2021a|2p=463|Howard-Johnston|2008|3p=947}}


==== Apex ====
As the 8th-century empire stabilised, the thematic militias proved rebellious and only suitable for defensive operations.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2021a|1p=463|Treadgold|1995|2pp=25, 209|Decker|2013|3pp=77–78}} The professional ''[[Tagma (military)|tagmata]]'' regiments, first introduced in the mid-700s and consisting of native Byzantine units alongside foreign forces such as the [[Varangian Guard]], had completely replaced them by the 11th century.{{sfnm|Haldon|1999|1p=92|Decker|2013|2pp=78–82}} The mobile ''tagmata'', suitable for offensive warfare, evolved new tactical and strategic structures;{{sfn|Haldon|2008b|p=556}} the late 10th-century army, perhaps the highest-quality force the empire produced, numbered approximately 140,000, up from below 100,000 in the late 700s.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1995|1p=67|Kaldellis|2021a|2p=463|Kaldellis|2023|3p=562}} However, its defensive capacities were neglected, especially during the 11th-century civil wars, leading to the loss of Anatolia to the Seljuks.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=557|Treadgold|1995|2pp=214–218}} The navy had also been reduced, as the empire increasingly relied on potentially hostile powers such as [[Republic of Venice|Venice]].{{sfn|Haldon|2008b|p=560}}
[[File:Bizansist touchup.jpg|thumb|upright=1.45|[[Constantinople]] was the largest and wealthiest city in Europe throughout late antiquity and most of the Middle Ages until the [[Fourth Crusade]] in 1204.]]


Basil II is considered among the most capable Byzantine emperors and his reign as the apex of the empire in the [[Middle Ages]]. By 1025, the date of Basil II's death, the Byzantine Empire stretched from Armenia in the east to [[Calabria]] in southern Italy in the west.<ref name="Browning-1992-116" /> Many successes had been achieved, ranging from the conquest of Bulgaria to the annexation of parts of Georgia and Armenia, and the [[Byzantine Crete|reconquests of Crete]], [[Cyprus in the Middle Ages|Cyprus]], and the important city of [[Siege of Antioch (968–969)|Antioch]]. These were not temporary tactical gains but long-term reconquests.<ref name="Browning-1992-96" />
Post-1081 reforms re-established an effective army; the institution of [[feudal]]-like ''[[pronoia]]'' grants provided revenue to individuals in exchange for soldiers.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=557|Kaldellis|2021a|2p=464|Bartusis|1997|3pp=5–6}} The new army heavily relied on foreign mercenaries alongside indigenous Byzantine troops, but the financial demands of a standing army proved too much for the Byzantine state, which succumbed to the [[Fourth Crusade]] in 1204.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=557|Bartusis|1997|2pp=5–7|Decker|2013|3p=82}} The [[Byzantine army (Palaiologan era)|army of the Palaiologan dynasty]], which retook Constantinople in 1261, was generally composed of a similar mix of mercenaries and indigenous troops, but it had lost all offensive capability by the late 1200s.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1pp=557–558|Decker|2013|2pp=82–83}} The empire's continued survival depended on foreign armies; attempts in the 1340s to rebuild the fleet, unwisely disbanded in 1284, were forcibly halted by [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]].{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1pp=558–560|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=812, 860–861}} No post-1204 Byzantine field army fielded more than 5,000 troops, and less than 8,000 defended [[Fall of Constantinople|the final siege of Constantinople]] in 1453.{{sfnm|Decker|2013|1p=40|Haldon|2008b|2p=559}}


Leo VI achieved the complete [[Basilika|codification of Byzantine law]] in Greek. This monumental work of 60 volumes became the foundation of all subsequent Byzantine law and is still studied today.<ref name="Browning-1992-97-98">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=97–98}}.</ref> Leo also reformed the administration of the empire, redrawing the borders of the administrative subdivisions (the ''[[Theme (Byzantine district)|themata]]'', or "themes") and tidying up the system of ranks and privileges, as well as regulating the behaviour of the various trade guilds in Constantinople. Leo's reform did much to reduce the previous fragmentation of the empire, which henceforth had one centre of power, Constantinople.<ref name="Browning-1992-98-99">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=98–99}}.</ref> However, the increasing military success of the empire greatly enriched and gave the provincial nobility more power over the peasantry, who were essentially reduced to a state of serfdom.<ref name="Browning-1992-98-109">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=98–109}}.</ref>
=== Diplomacy ===
{{Further|Byzantine diplomacy|Foreign relations of the Byzantine Empire}}
[[File:John the Grammarian as ambassador before Theophilos and Mamun.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.15|The embassy of [[Patriarch John VII of Constantinople|John the Grammarian]] in 829, sent by emperor [[Theophilos (emperor)|Theophilos]] to the Abbasid caliph [[Al-Ma'mun]]|alt=Manuscript illustration of an embassy travelling between two rulers]]


Under the Macedonian emperors Constantinople flourished, becoming the largest and wealthiest city in Europe, with a population of approximately 400,000 in the 9th and 10th centuries.<ref>{{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=130–131}}; {{Harvnb|Pounds|1979|p=124}}.</ref> During this period, the Byzantine Empire employed a strong civil service staffed by competent aristocrats that oversaw the collection of taxes, domestic administration, and foreign policy. The Macedonian emperors also increased the empire's wealth by fostering trade with Western Europe, particularly through [[Byzantine silk|the sale of silk]] and metalwork.<ref>{{Harvnb|Duiker|Spielvogel|2010|p=317}}.</ref>
Byzantine strategy was primarily defensive, aside from the brief period of aggression between the ninth and eleventh centuries, because of the empire's habitual lack of resources.{{sfnm|Howard-Johnston|2008|1p=940|Kaldellis|2021a|2p=463}} To avoid risky and expensive military campaigns, the Byzantines [[Byzantine diplomacy|engaged in extensive diplomatic efforts]].{{sfnm|Haldon|1999|1p=278|Decker|2013|2p=130|Kaldellis|2021a|3p=465}} These took various forms, including: formal embassies, client management, alliance or peace negotiations, political marriages, [[propaganda]] and bribery, or even [[espionage]] and assassination.{{sfnm|Decker|2013|1p=130, 135–137|Kazhdan|1990|2pp=15–17}}


==== Split between Orthodoxy and Catholicism (1054) ====
Defensively oriented Byzantine diplomacy was intended to protect the ''[[Ecumene|oikoumenē]]'', the civilised Christian world which the empire rightfully ruled.{{sfnm|Kazhdan|1990|1pp=10–11|Decker|2013|2p=129}} The decline of the key [[Limitrophe states|''limitrophe'' system]], wherein client states along the borders served as intermediaries between the empire and other large enemies, exposed the empire to attack. By the eleventh century, Byzantine diplomacy was more bilateral and balanced.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1990|pp=11–15, 18–21}} Although it lost some important advantages post-1204, diplomacy, including the still-influential Orthodox church, was nevertheless a central element in the empire's lengthy survival until 1453.{{sfnm|Howard-Johnston|2008|1p=945|Kazhdan|1990|2pp=20–21|Bartusis|1997|3p=348|Kaldellis|2021a|4p=466}}
{{Further|East–West Schism}}
[[File:Cyril-methodius-small.jpg|thumb|upright|Mural of [[Saints Cyril and Methodius]], 19th century, [[Troyan Monastery]], Bulgaria]]


The [[Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty|Macedonian period]] included events of momentous religious significance. The conversion of the Bulgarians, Serbs and Rus' to Orthodox Christianity drew the religious map of Europe which still resonates today. [[Cyril and Methodius]], two Byzantine Greek brothers from Thessaloniki, contributed significantly to the [[Christianization of the Slavs|Christianisation of the Slavs]] and in the process devised the [[Glagolitic script|Glagolitic alphabet]], ancestor to the [[Cyrillic script]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Timberlake|2004|p=14}}.</ref>
== Society ==


In 1054, relations between the Eastern and Western traditions of the [[Chalcedonian Christianity|Chalcedonian]] Christian Church reached a terminal crisis. Although there was a formal declaration of institutional separation on 16 July, when three papal legates entered the Hagia Sophia during Divine Liturgy on a Saturday afternoon and placed a [[Papal bull|bull]] of excommunication on the altar,<ref>{{Harvnb|Patterson|1995|p=15}}.</ref> the so-called Great Schism was actually the culmination of centuries of gradual separation.<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=83}}.</ref>
=== Demography ===
{{Main|Demography of the Byzantine Empire}}


=== Crisis and fragmentation ===
{{See also|Rhomaioi (endonym)}}
The Byzantine Empire fell into a period of difficulties, caused to a large extent by the undermining of the theme system and the neglect of the military. Nikephoros II, John Tzimiskes, and Basil II shifted the emphasis of the military divisions ({{Lang|grc|τάγματα}}, ''[[tagma (military)|tagmata]]'') from a reactive, defence-oriented citizen army into an army of professional career soldiers, increasingly dependent on foreign mercenaries. Mercenaries were expensive, however, and as the threat of invasion receded in the 10th century, so did the need for maintaining large garrisons and expensive fortifications.<ref>{{Harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=548–549}}.</ref> Basil II left a burgeoning treasury upon his death, but he neglected to plan for his succession. None of his immediate successors had any particular military or political talent, and the imperial administration increasingly fell into the hands of the civil service. Incompetent efforts to revive the Byzantine economy resulted in severe inflation and a debased gold currency. The army was seen as both an unnecessary expense and a political threat. A number of standing local units were demobilised, further augmenting the army's dependence on mercenaries, who could be retained and dismissed on an as-needed basis.<ref name="PM">Markham, "[http://faculty.uml.edu/ethan_spanier/Teaching/documents/TheBattleofManzikert.pdf The Battle of Manzikert] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160429203111/http://faculty.uml.edu/ethan_spanier/Teaching/documents/TheBattleofManzikert.pdf |date=29 April 2016 }}".</ref>


[[File:The seizure of Edessa in Syria by the Byzantine army and the Arabic counterattack from the Chronicle of John Skylitzes.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|The seizure of [[Edessa]] (1031) by the Byzantines under [[George Maniakes]] and the counterattack by the [[Seljuk Turks]]]]
Scholars associate the Roman, Hellenic, and Christian imperial identities with the general population, but there is ongoing debate about how these and other regional identities blended together.{{sfnm|Stewart|2022|1pp=2-7, 10|Muthesius|2022|2pp=81, 96|Kaldellis|2022b|3pp=248, 258|Pohl|2018|4p=20|Stouraitis|2018|5pp=125-127}}


At the same time, Byzantium was faced with new enemies. Its provinces in southern Italy were threatened by the [[Italo-Normans|Normans]] who arrived in Italy at the beginning of the 11th century. During a period of strife between Constantinople and Rome culminating in the East-West Schism of 1054, the [[Norman conquest of southern Italy|Normans advanced slowly but steadily]] into Byzantine Italy.<ref>{{Harvnb|Vasiliev|1928–1935}}, "[http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0832/_P17.HTM Relations with Italy and Western Europe] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012025518/http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0832/_P17.HTM |date=12 October 2017 }}".</ref> [[Reggio Calabria|Reggio]], the capital of the tagma of [[Calabria]], was captured in 1060 by [[Robert Guiscard]], followed by [[Otranto]] in 1068. [[Bari]], the main Byzantine stronghold in [[Apulia]], was besieged in August 1068 and [[Siege of Bari|fell in April 1071]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Hooper|Bennett|1996|p=82}}; {{Harvnb|Stephenson|2000|p=157}}.</ref>
As many as 27&nbsp;million people lived in the empire at its peak in 540, but this fell to 12&nbsp;million by 800.{{Sfnm|Treadgold|1997b|1pp=197, 384–385|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=21–22|Stathakopoulos|2008|3p=310}} Although plague and territorial losses to Arab Muslim invaders weakened the empire, it eventually recovered and by the near end of the [[Macedonian dynasty]] in 1025, the population is estimated to have been as high as 18 million.{{Sfnm|Stathakopoulos|2008|1p=312|Treadgold|1997b|2pp=931–932}} A few decades after the recapture of Constantinople in 1282, the empire's population was in the range of 3–5 million; by 1312, the number had dropped to 2&nbsp;million.{{Sfnm|Stathakopoulos|2008|1p=313|Treadgold|1997b|2p=1112}} By the time the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople, there were only 50,000 people in the city, one-tenth of its population in its prime.{{Sfnm|Stathakopoulos|2008|1pp=310, 314|Stathakopoulos|2023|2p=31|Kaldellis|2023|3p=21}}


About 1053, [[Constantine IX Monomachos|Constantine IX]] disbanded what the historian [[John Skylitzes]] calls the "Iberian Army", which consisted of 50,000 men, and it was turned into a contemporary [[Droungarios of the Watch|Drungary of the Watch]]. Two other knowledgeable contemporaries, the former officials [[Michael Attaleiates]] and [[Kekaumenos]], agree with Skylitzes that by demobilising these soldiers Constantine did catastrophic harm to the empire's eastern defences. The emergency lent weight to the military aristocracy in Anatolia, who in 1068 secured the election of one of their own, [[Romanos IV Diogenes|Romanos Diogenes]], as emperor. In the summer of 1071, Romanos undertook a massive eastern campaign to draw the Seljuks into a general engagement with the Byzantine army. At the [[Battle of Manzikert]], Romanos suffered a surprise defeat by [[Sultan]] [[Alp Arslan]] and was captured. Alp Arslan treated him with respect and imposed no harsh terms on the Byzantines.<ref name="PM" /> In Constantinople, however, a coup put in power [[Michael VII Doukas|Michael Doukas]], who soon faced the opposition of [[Nikephoros Bryennios the Elder|Nikephoros Bryennios]] and [[Nikephoros III Botaneiates]]. By 1081, the Seljuks had expanded their rule over virtually the entire Anatolian plateau from Armenia in the east to [[Bithynia]] in the west, and they had founded their capital at [[Nicaea]], just {{Convert|90|km|0|abbr=off}} from Constantinople.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |date=2002 |title=Byzantine Empire |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}; Markham, "[http://faculty.uml.edu/ethan_spanier/Teaching/documents/TheBattleofManzikert.pdf The Battle of Manzikert] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160429203111/http://faculty.uml.edu/ethan_spanier/Teaching/documents/TheBattleofManzikert.pdf |date=29 April 2016 }}".</ref>
=== Cuisine and dining ===
{{Main|Byzantine cuisine}}


=== Komnenian dynasty and the Crusades ===
Feasting was central to the culture.{{sfn|Bryer|2008|p=673}} By the 10th century, dining shifted from [[Triclinium|reclining]] to tables with clean linen.{{sfn|Ash|1995|pp=244-245}} The introduction of the [[fork]] and [[salad dressing]] (with [[food oil|oil]] and [[vinegar]]) further shaped Italian and Western traditions.{{Sfnm|Ash|1995|1p=244|Decker|2008|2p=496}} Classical Greco-Roman era foods were common such as the condiment {{lang|grc-Latn|[[garum|garos]]}} (similar to fermented [[fish sauce]]s today) as well as the still popular [[baklava]].{{Sfnm|Faas|2005|1pp=184–185|Bryer|2008|2p=671|Ash|1995|3p=233|Vryonis|1971|4p=482}} Fruits like [[aubergine]] and [[orange (fruit)|orange]], unknown during classical times, were added to diets.{{Sfn|Davidson|2014|p=123}} Foods that have continued into the modern era include the cured meat [[pastirma|paston]], [[Feta]] cheese, salt roe similar to the modern [[boutargue]], Black sea [[caviar]], [[tiropita]], [[dolma]]des, and the soup {{lang|grc-Latn|[[tarhana|trachanas]]}}.{{Sfnm|Ash|1995|1p=244|Davidson|2014|2p=123|Bryer|2008|3p=671|Salaman|1986|4p=184}} There were famed medieval sweet wines such as the [[Malvasia]] from [[Monemvasia]], the [[Commandaria]], and the eponymous [[Rumney wine]] which were drunk, as were [[millet beer]] (known as {{lang|grc-Latn|boza}}) and [[retsina]].{{Sfnm|Bryer|2008|1pp=672-673|Unwin|2010|2p=185}}
{{See also|Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty}}
[[File:Alexios I Komnenos.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Alexios I Komnenos|Alexios I]], founder of the [[Komnenos|Komnenos dynasty]]]]


After Manzikert, a partial recovery (referred to as the [[Komnenian restoration]]) was made possible by the [[Komnenos|Komnenian dynasty]].<ref name="M124">{{Harvnb|Magdalino|2002a|p=124}}.</ref> During the Komnenian period from about 1081 to about 1185, the dynasty presided over a sustained, though ultimately incomplete, restoration of the military, territorial, economic, and political position of the Byzantine Empire.<ref name="Browning-1992-190">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=190}}.</ref> Although the Seljuk Turks occupied the heartland of the empire in Anatolia, most Byzantine military efforts during this period were directed against Western powers, particularly the Normans.<ref name="Browning-1992-190" />
=== Recreation ===
[[File:Tabula - boardgame - Zeno game.svg|thumb|A game of [[tabula (game)|τάβλι (tabula)]] played by the [[Byzantine]] emperor [[Zeno (emperor)|Zeno]] in 480 and recorded by [[Agathias]] in {{Circa|530}} because of a very unlucky dice throw for Zeno (red){{Sfn|Horn|Schädler|2019}}|alt=A depiction of a board game]]


The empire under the Komnenoi played a key role in the history of the [[Crusades]] in the Holy Land, which Alexios I had helped bring about, while also exerting enormous cultural and political influence in Europe, the [[Near East]], and the lands around the Mediterranean Sea under John and Manuel. Contact between Byzantium and the "Latin" West, including the [[Crusader states]], increased significantly during the Komnenian period. Venetian and other Italian traders became resident in large numbers in Constantinople and the empire (there were an estimated 60,000 Latins in Constantinople alone, out of a population of three to four hundred thousand), and their presence together with the numerous Latin mercenaries who were employed by Manuel helped to spread Byzantine technology, art, literature and culture throughout the Latin West, while also leading to a flow of Western ideas and customs into the empire.<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2006|p=46}}.</ref>
[[Chariot racing|Chariot races]] were held from the early era until 1204, becoming one of the world's longest continuous sporting events.{{sfnm|Jeffreys|2008a|1pp=681-682|Kaldellis|2023|2p=13, 138}} [[Mime artist|Mimes]], the [[pantomime]] and some wild animal shows were prominent until the 6th century.{{sfn|Jeffreys|2008a|p=680}} Because Christian bishops and pagan philosophers did not like these activities, the state's funding for them ceased, leading to their decline and a move to private entertainment and sporting.{{sfnm|Jeffreys|2008a|1pp=678-683|Kaldellis|2023 |2pp=187, 233}} A Persian version of polo introduced by the Crusaders called [[Tzykanisterion|Tzykanion]] was played by the nobility and urban aristocracy in major cities during the middle and late eras, as was the sport of jousting introduced from the West.{{Sfnm|Kazhdan|1991a|1p=2137, "Tzykanisterion" |Kazanaki-Lappa|2002|2p=643|Jeffreys |2008a|3p=683 |Kaldellis|2023|4pp=672, 844}} Over time, [[Board game|game boards]] like [[Tabula (game)|tavli]] became increasingly popular.{{Sfn|Jeffreys|2008a|p=683}}
 
==== Alexios I and the First Crusade ====
{{See also|First Crusade}}
[[File:Chora_Church_Constantinople_2007_panorama_002.jpg|thumb|250px|The [[Chora Church]], dating from the [[Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty|Komnenian period]], has some of the finest Byzantine frescoes and mosaics.]]
 
The Komnenoi attained power under [[Alexios I Komnenos|Alexios I]] in 1081. From the outset of his reign, Alexios faced a formidable attack by the Normans under Guiscard and his son [[Bohemond I of Antioch|Bohemund of Taranto]], who [[Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)|captured Dyrrhachium]] and [[Corfu]] and laid siege to [[Larissa]] in [[Thessaly]]. Guiscard's death in 1085 temporarily eased the Norman problem. The following year, the Seljuq sultan died, and the sultanate was split by internal rivalries. By his own efforts, Alexios defeated the [[Pechenegs]], who were caught by surprise and annihilated at the [[Battle of Levounion]] on 28 April 1091.<ref name="Br">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Byzantine Empire |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref>
 
[[File:Byzantiumforecrusades.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|The Byzantine Empire and the Seljuk [[Sultanate of Rûm]] before the [[First Crusade]] (1095–1099)]]
 
Having achieved stability in the West, Alexios could turn his attention to the severe economic difficulties and the disintegration of the empire's traditional defences.<ref name="Birkenmeier">{{Harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002}}.</ref> However, he still did not have enough manpower to recover the lost territories in Asia Minor and to advance against the Seljuks. At the [[Council of Piacenza]] in 1095, envoys from Alexios spoke to [[Pope Urban II]] about the suffering of the Christians of the East and underscored that without help from the West they would continue to suffer under Muslim rule.<ref name="Harris">{{Harvnb|Harris|2014}}; {{Harvnb|Read|2000|p=124}}; {{Harvnb|Watson|1993|p=12}}.</ref> Urban saw Alexios request as a dual opportunity to cement Western Europe and reunite the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] with the [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic Church]] under his rule.<ref name="Harris" /> On 27 November 1095, Urban called the [[Council of Clermont]] and urged all those present to take up arms under the sign of the [[Christian cross|Cross]] and launch an armed [[pilgrimage]] to recover Jerusalem and the East from the Muslims. The response in Western Europe was overwhelming.<ref name="Br" />
 
Alexios had anticipated help in the form of mercenary forces from the West, but he was totally unprepared for the immense and undisciplined force that arrived in Byzantine territory. It was no comfort to Alexios to learn that four of the eight leaders of the main body of the Crusade were Normans, among them Bohemund. Since the crusade had to pass through Constantinople, however, the emperor had some control over it. He required its leaders to swear to restore to the empire any towns or territories they might reconquer from the Turks on their way to the Holy Land. In return, he gave them guides and a military escort.<ref name="A261">{{Harvnb|Komnene|1928|loc=''Alexiad'', [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/AnnaComnena-Alexiad10.html 10.261]}}</ref> Alexios was able to recover a number of important cities, islands and much of western Asia Minor. The Crusaders agreed to become Alexios' vassals under the [[Treaty of Devol]] in 1108, which marked the end of the Norman threat during Alexios' reign.<ref name="A348-358">{{Harvnb|Komnene|1928|loc=''Alexiad'', [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/annacomnena-alexiad13.html 13.348–13.358]}}; {{Harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=46}}.</ref>
 
==== John II, Manuel I and the Second Crusade ====
{{See also|Second Crusade}}[[File:Comnenus mosaics Hagia Sophia.jpg|thumb|250px|A [[mosaic]] from the [[Hagia Sophia]] of [[Constantinople]] (modern Istanbul), depicting [[Mary, mother of Jesus|Mary]] and [[Jesus]], flanked by [[John II Komnenos]] (left) and his wife [[Irene of Hungary]] (right), 12th century]]
[[File:The Byzantine Empire, c.1180.svg|thumb|250px|Byzantine Empire in orange, {{Circa|1180}}, at the end of the [[Komnenian restoration|Komnenian period]]]]
 
Alexios's son [[John II Komnenos]] succeeded him in 1118 and ruled until 1143. John was a pious and dedicated emperor who was determined to undo the damage to the empire suffered at the Battle of Manzikert half a century earlier.<ref>{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=267}}.</ref> Famed for his piety and his remarkably mild and just reign, John was an exceptional example of a moral ruler at a time when cruelty was the norm.<ref>{{Harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1969|p=377}}.</ref> For this reason, he has been called the Byzantine [[Marcus Aurelius]]. During his twenty-five-year reign, John made alliances with the Holy Roman Empire in the West and decisively defeated the Pechenegs at the [[Battle of Beroia]].<ref name="B90">{{Harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=90}}.</ref> He thwarted Hungarian and Serbian threats during the 1120s, and in 1130 he allied himself with [[List of German monarchs|German Emperor]] [[Lothair III, Holy Roman Emperor|Lothair III]] against Norman King [[Roger II of Sicily]].{{Sfn|Cinnamus|1976|pp=74–75}}
 
In the later part of his reign, John focused his activities on the East, personally leading [[Byzantine–Seljuk wars|numerous campaigns against the Turks]] in Asia Minor. His campaigns fundamentally altered the balance of power in the East, forcing the Turks onto the defensive, while restoring many towns, fortresses, and cities across the peninsula to the Byzantines. He defeated the [[Danishmendids|Danishmend Emirate]] of [[Malatya|Melitene]] and reconquered all of [[Cilicia]], while forcing [[Raymond of Poitiers]], Prince of Antioch, to recognise Byzantine suzerainty. In an effort to demonstrate the emperor's role as the leader of the Christian world, John marched into the [[Holy Land]] at the head of the combined forces of the empire and the Crusader states; yet despite his great vigour pressing the campaign, his hopes were disappointed by the treachery of his Crusader allies.<ref>{{Harvnb|Harris|2014|p=84}}.</ref> In 1142, John returned to press his claims to Antioch, but he died in the spring of 1143 following a hunting accident.
 
John's chosen heir was his fourth son, [[Manuel I Komnenos]], who campaigned aggressively against his neighbours both in the west and in the east. In Palestine, Manuel allied with the Crusader [[Kingdom of Jerusalem]] and sent a large fleet to participate in a combined invasion of [[Fatimid Caliphate|Fatimid Egypt]]. Manuel reinforced his position as overlord of the Crusader states, with his hegemony over Antioch and Jerusalem secured by agreement with [[Raynald of Châtillon|Raynald]], Prince of Antioch, and [[Amalric of Jerusalem]].<ref name="S">{{Harvnb|Magdalino|2002a|p=74}}.</ref> In an effort to restore Byzantine control over the ports of southern Italy, he sent an expedition to Italy in 1155, but disputes within the coalition led to the eventual failure of the campaign. Despite this military setback, Manuel's armies successfully invaded the southern parts of the [[Kingdom of Hungary]] in 1167, defeating the Hungarians at the [[Battle of Sirmium]]. By 1168, nearly the whole of the eastern Adriatic coast lay in Manuel's hands.<ref name="S372">{{Harvnb|Sedlar|1994|p=372}}.</ref> Manuel made several alliances with the pope and Western Christian kingdoms, and he successfully handled the passage of the crusaders through his empire.<ref name="M67">{{Harvnb|Magdalino|2002a|p=67}}.</ref>
 
In the East, however, Manuel suffered a major defeat in 1176 at the [[Battle of Myriokephalon]] against the Turks. Yet the losses were quickly recovered, and in the following year Manuel's forces inflicted a defeat upon a force of "picked Turks".<ref name="B129">{{Harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=128}}.</ref> The Byzantine commander [[John Komnenos Vatatzes|John Vatatzes]], who destroyed the Turkish invaders at the [[Battle of Hyelion and Leimocheir]], brought troops from the capital and was able to gather an army along the way, a sign that the Byzantine army remained strong and that the defensive programme of western Asia Minor was still successful.<ref name="B196">{{Harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=196}}.</ref>
 
==== 12th-century Renaissance ====
{{Further|Byzantine civilisation in the 12th century}}
{{See also|Byzantine army (Komnenian era)}}
[[File:Meister von Nerezi 001.jpg|thumb|upright=1.16|''The Lamentation of Christ'' (1164), a fresco from the [[Church of St. Panteleimon (Nerezi)|church of Saint Panteleimon]] in [[Nerezi]], [[North Macedonia]], considered a superb example of 12th-century [[Comnenus|Komnenian]] art]]
 
John and Manuel pursued active military policies, and both deployed considerable resources on sieges and city defences; aggressive fortification policies were at the heart of their imperial military policies.<ref name="B185-186">{{Harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|pp=185–186}}.</ref> Despite the defeat at Myriokephalon, the policies of Alexios, John and Manuel resulted in vast territorial gains, increased frontier stability in Asia Minor, and secured the stabilisation of the empire's European frontiers. From {{Circa|1081}} to {{Circa|1180}}, the Komnenian army assured the empire's security, enabling Byzantine civilisation to flourish.<ref name="Br1">{{Harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=1}}.</ref>
 
This allowed the Western provinces to achieve an economic revival that continued until the close of the century. It has been argued that Byzantium under the Komnenian rule was more prosperous than at any time since the Persian invasions of the 7th century. During the 12th century, population levels rose and extensive tracts of new agricultural land were brought into production. Archaeological evidence from both Europe and Asia Minor shows a considerable increase in the size of urban settlements, together with a notable upsurge in new towns. Trade was also flourishing; the Venetians, the [[Genoa|Genoese]] and others opened up the ports of the Aegean to commerce, shipping goods from the Crusader states and Fatimid Egypt to the west and trading with the empire via Constantinople.<ref name="Day">{{Harvnb|Day|1977|pp=289–290}}; {{Harvnb|Harvey|2003}}.</ref>
 
In artistic terms, there was a revival in [[mosaic]], and regional schools of architecture began producing many distinctive styles that drew on a range of cultural influences.<ref name="Diehl">{{Harvnb|Diehl|1948}}.</ref> During the 12th century, the Byzantines provided their model of early [[Renaissance humanism|humanism]] as a renaissance of interest in classical authors. In [[Eustathius of Thessalonica]], Byzantine humanism found its most characteristic expression.<ref name="TM">{{Harvnb|Tatakes|Moutafakis|2003|p=110}}.</ref> In philosophy, there was a resurgence of classical learning not seen since the 7th century, characterised by a significant increase in the publication of commentaries on classical works.<ref name="Browning-1992-190-218">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=198–208}}.</ref> Besides, the first transmission of classical Greek knowledge to the West occurred during the Komnenian period.<ref name="Browning-1992-218">{{Harvnb|Browning|1992|p=218}}.</ref> In terms of prosperity and cultural life, the Komnenian period was one of the peaks in Byzantine history,<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2006|p=42}}.</ref> and Constantinople remained the leading city of the Christian world in size, wealth, and culture.<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2006|p=47}}.</ref> There was a renewed interest in [[Ancient Greek philosophy|classical Greek philosophy]], as well as an increase in literary output in vernacular Greek.<ref name="Browning-1992-190-218" /> Byzantine art and literature held a pre-eminent place in Europe, and the cultural impact of Byzantine art on the West during this period was enormous and of long-lasting significance.<ref name="Browning-1992-218" />
 
=== Decline and disintegration ===
{{Main|Decline of the Byzantine Empire}}
 
==== Angelid dynasty ====
{{Main|Byzantine Empire under the Angelos dynasty}}
[[File:4KANGELOS.png|thumb|upright=1.15|[[Constantinople|Byzantium]] in the late Angeloi period]]
Manuel's death on 24 September 1180 left his 11-year-old son [[Alexios II Komnenos]] on the throne. Alexios was highly incompetent in the office, and with his mother [[Maria of Antioch]]'s Frankish background, his regency was unpopular.<ref name="Norwich291">{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=291}}.</ref> Eventually, [[Andronikos I Komnenos]], a grandson of Alexios I, launched a revolt against his younger relative and managed to overthrow him in a violent ''coup d'état''.<ref name="Norwich292">{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=292}}.</ref> Utilising his good looks and his immense popularity with the army, Andronikos marched to Constantinople in August 1182 and incited a [[massacre of the Latins]].<ref name="Norwich292" /> After eliminating his potential rivals, he had himself crowned as co-emperor in September 1183. He eliminated Alexios II and took his 12-year-old wife [[Agnes of France, Byzantine Empress|Agnes of France]] for himself.<ref name="Norwich292" />
 
Andronikos began his reign well; in particular, the measures he took to reform the government of the empire have been praised by historians. According to [[George Ostrogorsky]], Andronikos was determined to root out corruption: under his rule, the sale of offices ceased; selection was based on merit, rather than favouritism; officials were paid an adequate salary to reduce the temptation of bribery. In the provinces, Andronikos's reforms produced a speedy and marked improvement.<ref name="M194" /> The aristocrats were infuriated against him, and to make matters worse, Andronikos seems to have become increasingly unbalanced; executions and violence became increasingly common, and his reign turned into a reign of terror.<ref>{{Harvnb|Harris|2014|p=118}}.</ref> Andronikos seemed almost to seek the extermination of the aristocracy as a whole. The struggle against the aristocracy turned into wholesale slaughter, while the emperor resorted to ever more ruthless measures to shore up his regime.<ref name="M194">{{Harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1969|p=397}}.</ref>
 
Despite his military background, Andronikos failed to deal with [[Isaac Komnenos of Cyprus|Isaac Komnenos]], [[Béla III of Hungary]] who [[Byzantine–Hungarian War (1180–1185)|reincorporated]] Croatian territories into Hungary, and [[Stefan Nemanja|Stephen Nemanja of Serbia]] who declared his independence from the Byzantine Empire. Yet, none of these troubles would compare to [[William II of Sicily]]'s invasion force of 300 ships and 80,000 men, arriving in 1185 and [[Sack of Thessalonica (1185)|sacking Thessalonica]].<ref name="Norwich293">{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=293}}.</ref> Andronikos mobilised a small fleet of 100 ships to defend the capital, but other than that he was indifferent to the populace. He was finally overthrown when [[Isaac II Angelos]], surviving an imperial assassination attempt, seized power with the aid of the people and had Andronikos killed.<ref name="Norwich294-295">{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|pp=294–295}}.</ref>
 
The reign of Isaac II, and more so that of his brother [[Alexios III Angelos|Alexios III]], saw the collapse of what remained of the centralised machinery of Byzantine government and defence. Although the Normans were driven out of Greece, in 1186 the [[Vlachs]] and Bulgars began a rebellion that led to the formation of the [[Second Bulgarian Empire]]. The internal policy of the Angeloi was characterised by the squandering of the public treasure and fiscal maladministration. Imperial authority was severely weakened, and the growing power vacuum at the centre of the empire encouraged fragmentation. There is evidence that some Komnenian heirs had set up a semi-independent state in [[Trabzon|Trebizond]] before 1204.<ref name="AP">{{Harvnb|Angold|1997}}; {{Harvnb|Paparrigopoulos|Karolidis|1925|p=216}}</ref> According to [[Alexander Vasiliev (historian)|Alexander Vasiliev]], "the dynasty of the Angeloi, Greek in its origin,&nbsp;... accelerated the ruin of the Empire, already weakened without and disunited within."<ref name="VA">{{Harvnb|Vasiliev|1928–1935}}, "[http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0832/_P1B.HTM Foreign Policy of the Angeloi] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227032548/http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0832/_P1B.HTM |date=27 February 2021 }}".</ref>
 
==== Fourth Crusade ====
{{Main|Fourth Crusade}}
[[File:Eugène Ferdinand Victor Delacroix 012.jpg|thumb|right|250px|''[[Entry of the Crusaders in Constantinople|The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople]]'', by [[Eugène Delacroix]] (1840)]]
 
In 1198, [[Pope Innocent III]] broached the subject of a new crusade through [[Papal legate|legates]] and [[encyclical]] letters.<ref name="Norwich299">{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=299}}.</ref> The stated intent of the crusade was to conquer [[History of Arab Egypt#Ayyubid period|Egypt]], the centre of Muslim power in the Levant. The crusader army arrived at [[Republic of Venice|Venice]] in the summer of 1202 and hired the Venetian fleet to transport them to Egypt. As a payment to the Venetians, they captured the (Christian) port of [[Zadar#History|Zara]] in [[Dalmatia]] (vassal city of Venice, which had rebelled and placed itself under Hungary's protection in 1186).<ref name="BrC">Britannica Concise, [http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9383275/Siege-of-Zara Siege of Zara] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070706062040/http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9383275/Siege-of-Zara |date=6 July 2007 }}.</ref> Shortly afterwards, [[Alexios IV Angelos]], son of the deposed and blinded Emperor Isaac II, made contacts with the crusaders. Alexios offered to reunite the Byzantine church with Rome, pay the crusaders 200,000 silver marks, join the crusade, and provide all the supplies they needed to reach Egypt.<ref name="Norwich301">{{Harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=301}}.</ref>
 
==== Crusader sack of Constantinople (1204) ====
{{Further|Siege of Constantinople (1203)|Sack of Constantinople}}
[[File:LatinEmpire2.png|thumb|upright=1.15|The partition of the empire following the [[Fourth Crusade]], {{Circa|1204}}]]
 
The crusaders arrived at Constantinople in the summer of 1203 and quickly attacked, starting a major fire that damaged large parts of the city, and briefly seized control. Alexios III fled from the capital, and Alexios Angelos was elevated to the throne as Alexios IV along with his blind father Isaac. Alexios IV and Isaac II were unable to keep their promises and were deposed by [[Alexios V Doukas|Alexios V]]. The crusaders again took the city on 13 April 1204, and Constantinople was subjected to pillage and massacre by the rank and file for three days. Many priceless icons, relics and other objects later turned up in [[Western Europe]], a large number in Venice. According to chronicler [[Niketas Choniates]], a prostitute was even set up on the patriarchal throne.<ref name="NC">{{Harvnb|Choniates|1912}}, ''[http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/choniates1.html The Sack of Constantinople] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141030004048/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/choniates1.html |date=30 October 2014 }}''.</ref> When order had been restored, the crusaders and the Venetians proceeded to implement their agreement; [[Baldwin I, Latin Emperor|Baldwin of Flanders]] was elected emperor of a new [[Latin Empire]], and the Venetian [[Thomas Morosini]] was chosen as patriarch. The lands divided up among the leaders included most of the former Byzantine possessions.<ref name="Br40&nbsp;million">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=The Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref> Although Venice was more interested in commerce than conquering territory, it took key areas of Constantinople, and the [[Doge (title)|Doge]] took the title of "''Lord of a Quarter and Half a Quarter of the Roman Empire''".<ref>{{Harvnb|Norwich|1982|pp=127–143}}.</ref>
 
==== Empire in exile ====
{{Further|Frankokratia}}
After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 by Latin crusaders, two Byzantine successor states were established: the [[Empire of Nicaea]] and the [[Despotate of Epirus]]. A third, the [[Empire of Trebizond]], was created after [[Alexios I of Trebizond|Alexios]] [[Komnenos]], commanding the [[Kingdom of Georgia|Georgian]] expedition in [[Chaldia]]<ref>A. A. Vasiliev, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2846872 "The Foundation of the Empire of Trebizond (1204–1222)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308162542/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2846872 |date=8 March 2021 }}, ''Speculum'', '''11''' (1936), pp. 18f</ref> a few weeks before the sack of Constantinople, found himself [[de facto]] emperor and established himself in Trebizond. Of the three successor states, Epirus and Nicaea stood the best chance of reclaiming Constantinople. The Nicaean Empire struggled to survive the next few decades, however, and by the mid-13th century it had lost much of southern Anatolia.<ref>{{Harvnb|Kean|2006}}; {{Harvnb|Madden|2005|p=162}}.</ref> The weakening of the [[Sultanate of Rum|Sultanate of Rûm]] following the [[Battle of Köse Dağ|Mongol invasion in 1242–1243]] allowed many [[Anatolian beyliks|beyliks]] and [[Ghazi (warrior)|ghazis]] to set up their own principalities in Anatolia, weakening the Byzantine hold on Asia Minor.<ref>{{Harvnb|Köprülü|1992|pp=33–41}}.</ref> In time, one of the Beys, [[Osman I]], created the [[Ottoman Empire]] that would eventually conquer Constantinople. However, the Mongol invasion also gave Nicaea a temporary respite from Seljuk attacks, allowing it to concentrate on the Latin Empire to its north.
 
==== Reconquest of Constantinople ====
{{Main|Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty}}{{Further|Palaeologan Renaissance}}[[File:1263 Mediterranean Sea.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|The Byzantine Empire, {{Circa|1263}}]]
 
The Empire of Nicaea, founded by the [[Laskaris|Laskarid dynasty]], managed to effect the [[Reconquest of Constantinople|recapture of Constantinople]] from the Latins in 1261 and defeat [[Epirus]]. This led to a short-lived revival of Byzantine fortunes under [[Michael VIII Palaiologos]], but the war-ravaged empire was ill-equipped to deal with the enemies that surrounded it. To maintain his campaigns against the Latins, Michael pulled troops from Asia Minor and levied crippling taxes on the peasantry, causing much resentment.<ref>{{Harvnb|Madden|2005|p=179}}; {{Harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=260}}.</ref> Massive construction projects were completed in Constantinople to repair the damage of the Fourth Crusade, but none of these initiatives was of any comfort to the farmers in Asia Minor suffering raids from Muslim ghazis.<ref name="{{Harvnb|reinert|2002|p=257}}.">{{Harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=257}}.</ref>
 
Rather than holding on to his possessions in Asia Minor, Michael chose to expand the empire, gaining only short-term success. To avoid another sacking of the capital by the Latins, he forced the Church to submit to Rome, again a temporary solution for which the peasantry hated Michael and Constantinople.<ref name="{{Harvnb|reinert|2002|p=257}}." /> The efforts of [[Andronikos II Palaiologos|Andronikos II]] and later his grandson [[Andronikos III Palaiologos|Andronikos III]] marked Byzantium's last genuine attempts in restoring the glory of the empire. However, the use of mercenaries by Andronikos II often backfired, with the [[Catalan Company]] ravaging the countryside and increasing resentment towards Constantinople.<ref>{{Harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=261}}.</ref>
 
=== Fall ===
 
==== Rise of the Ottomans and fall of Constantinople ====
{{Main|Byzantine–Ottoman wars|Fall of Constantinople}}
[[File:Le_siège_de_Constantinople_(1453)_by_Jean_Le_Tavernier_after_1455.jpg|thumb|upright|right|The [[Fall of Constantinople|siege of Constantinople]] in 1453, depicted in a 15th-century French miniature]]
 
The situation became worse for Byzantium during the civil wars after Andronikos III died. A [[Byzantine civil war of 1341–1347|six-year-long civil war]] devastated the empire, allowing the Serbian ruler [[Stefan Dušan]] to overrun most of the empire's remaining territory and establish a [[Serbian Empire]]. In 1354, an earthquake at [[Gelibolu|Gallipoli]] devastated the fort, allowing the [[Ottoman Turks|Ottomans]] (who were hired as mercenaries during the civil war by [[John VI Kantakouzenos]]) to establish themselves in Europe.<ref>{{Harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=268}}.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Vasilʹev |first=Aleksandr Aleksandrovich |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EXiWAwAAQBAJ |title=History of the Byzantine Empire, 324–1453 |date=1964 |publisher=Univ of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0-299-80925-6 |language=en |access-date=19 July 2021 |archive-date=8 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210808183933/https://books.google.com/books?id=EXiWAwAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> By the time the Byzantine civil wars had ended, the Ottomans had defeated the Serbians and subjugated them as vassals. Following the [[Battle of Kosovo]], much of the Balkans became dominated by the Ottomans.<ref>{{Harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=270}}.</ref>
 
The Byzantine emperors appealed to the West for help, but the pope would only consider sending aid in return for a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox Church with the [[Holy See|See of Rome]]. Church unity was considered and occasionally accomplished by imperial decree, but the Orthodox citizenry and clergy intensely resented the authority of Rome and the [[Latin Church]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Runciman|1990|pp=71–72}}.</ref> Some Western troops arrived to bolster the Christian defence of Constantinople, but most Western rulers, distracted by their own affairs, did nothing as the Ottomans picked apart the remaining Byzantine territories.<ref name="R84-85">{{Harvnb|Runciman|1990|pp=84–85}}.</ref>
 
Constantinople by this stage was underpopulated and dilapidated. The population of the city had collapsed so severely that it was now little more than a cluster of villages separated by fields. On 2 April 1453, [[Mehmed II|Sultan Mehmed]]'s army of 80,000 men and large numbers of irregulars laid siege to the city.<ref name="R84-86">{{Harvnb|Runciman|1990|pp=84–86}}.</ref> Despite a desperate last-ditch defence of the city by the massively outnumbered Christian forces (c. 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreign),<ref name="R84-85" /> Constantinople finally fell to the Ottomans after a two-month siege on 29 May 1453. The final Byzantine emperor, [[Constantine XI Palaiologos]], was last seen casting off his imperial regalia and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were taken.<ref>{{Harvnb|Hindley|2004|p=300}}.</ref>
 
=== Political aftermath ===
[[File:Eastern Mediterranean 1450.svg|thumb|upright|200px|The Eastern Mediterranean just before the [[Fall of Constantinople]]]]
[[File:Byzantine imperial flag, 14th century.svg|thumb|200px|right|[[Byzantine flags and insignia|Flag of the late Empire]] under the Palaiologoi, sporting the [[tetragrammic cross]] symbol of the [[Palaiologos dynasty]]]]
By the time of the fall of Constantinople, the Byzantine Empire, already an empire in name only since the Fourth Crusade, had been reduced to three [[rump state]]s, which were the [[Despotate of the Morea]], the Empire of Trebizond and the [[Principality of Theodoro]]. The Morea was ruled by the brothers of Constantine XI, [[Thomas Palaiologos]] and [[Demetrios Palaiologos]]. The despotate continued as an independent state by paying an annual tribute to the Ottomans. Incompetent rule, failure to pay the annual tribute, and a revolt against the Ottomans finally led to Mehmed II's invasion of Morea in May 1460.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Russell |first=Eugenia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gCwU8eqbxBoC&q=Mehmed+II%27s+invasion+of+Morea+in+May+1460.&pg=PA160 |title=Literature and Culture in Late Byzantine Thessalonica |date=28 March 2013 |publisher=A&C Black |isbn=978-1-4411-5584-9 |language=en |access-date=2 October 2020 |archive-date=28 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180628225720/https://books.google.com/books?id=gCwU8eqbxBoC |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
A few holdouts remained for a time. The island of [[Monemvasia]] refused to surrender, and it was ruled for a short time by an Aragonese corsair. When the population drove him out they obtained the consent of Thomas to place themselves under the pope's protection before the end of 1460. The [[Mani Peninsula]], on the Morea's south end, resisted under a loose coalition of the local clans and then that area came under Venice's rule. The last holdout was Salmeniko, in the Morea's northwest. [[Graitzas Palaiologos]] was the military commander there, stationed at [[Salmeniko Castle]]. While the town eventually surrendered, Graitzas and his garrison and some town residents held out in the castle until July 1461, when they escaped and reached Venetian territory.<ref>{{Harvnb|Miller|1907|loc=[https://archive.org/stream/journalofhelleni27sociuoft#page/236/mode/1up p. 236]}}</ref>
 
The Empire of Trebizond, which had split away from the Byzantine Empire just weeks before Constantinople was taken by the Crusaders in 1204, became the last remnant and last de facto successor state to the Byzantine Empire. Efforts by Emperor [[David of Trebizond|David]] to recruit European powers for an anti-Ottoman crusade provoked war between the Ottomans and Trebizond in the summer of 1461. After a [[Siege of Trebizond (1461)|month-long siege]], David surrendered the city of Trebizond on 14 August 1461. Trebizond's Crimean principality, the [[Principality of Theodoro]] (part of the [[Perateia]]), lasted another 14 years, falling to the Ottomans in December 1475. Therefore, the last territorial remnant of the Roman Empire had officially ceased to exist, after 2,228 years of Roman civilization, since the legendary [[Founding of Rome]] in 753 BC.
 
A nephew of the last emperor, Constantine XI, [[Andreas Palaiologos]] claimed to have inherited the title of Byzantine emperor. He lived in the Morea until its fall in 1460, then escaped to Rome where he lived under the protection of the [[Papal States]] for the remainder of his life. Since the office of the emperor had never been technically hereditary, Andreas' claim would have been without merit under Byzantine law. However, the empire had vanished, and Western states generally followed the Roman-church-sanctioned principles of hereditary sovereignty. Seeking a life in the west, Andreas styled himself ''Imperator Constantinopolitanus'' ("Emperor of Constantinople"), and sold his succession rights to both [[Charles VIII of France]] and the [[Catholic Monarchs of Spain|Catholic Monarchs]].
 
Constantine XI died without producing an heir, and had Constantinople not fallen he might have been succeeded by the sons of his deceased elder brother, who were taken into the palace service of Mehmed II after the fall of Constantinople. The oldest boy, renamed [[Hass Murad Pasha|Has Murad]], became a personal favorite of Mehmed and served as [[beylerbey]] (governor-general) of the Balkans. The younger son, renamed [[Mesih Pasha]], became admiral of the Ottoman fleet and [[sanjak-bey]] (governor) of the Province of [[Gallipoli]]. He eventually served twice as [[grand vizier]] under Mehmed's son, [[Bayezid II]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Lowry|2003|pp=115–116}}.</ref>
 
Mehmed II and his successors continued to [[Ottoman claim to Roman succession|consider themselves heirs]] to the Roman Empire. They considered that they had shifted their religious basis as Constantine had done before, and they continued to refer to their conquered Eastern Roman inhabitants ([[Orthodoxy#Christiannity|Orthodox Christians]]) as [[Rum (endonym)|Rûm]]. However, this claim gradually faded away, as the Ottoman Empire assumed a more Islamic political identity.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Üre |first=Pinar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d7rEDwAAQBAJ |title=Reclaiming Byzantium: Russia, Turkey and the Archaeological Claim to the Middle East in the 19th Century |date=2020-02-20 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-78831-012-3 |language=en}}</ref> Meanwhile, the [[Danubian Principalities]] (whose rulers also considered themselves the heirs of the Eastern Roman Emperors<ref>{{Harvnb|Clark|2000|p=213}}.</ref>) harbored Orthodox refugees, including some Byzantine nobles.
 
At Constantine's death, the role of the emperor as a patron of Eastern Orthodoxy was claimed by [[Ivan III of Russia|Ivan III]], Grand Prince of [[Grand Duchy of Moscow|Muscovy]]. He had married Andreas' sister, [[Sophia Palaiologina]], whose grandson, [[Ivan the Terrible|Ivan IV]], would become the first tsar of Russia (''tsar'', or ''czar'', meaning ''caesar'', is a term traditionally applied by Slavs to the Byzantine emperors). Their successors supported the idea that Moscow was the proper heir to Rome and Constantinople. The idea of the [[Russian Empire]] as the successive [[Succession of the Roman Empire|Third Rome]] was kept alive until its demise with the [[Russian Revolution]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Seton-Watson|1967|p=31}}.</ref>
 
== Government and bureaucracy ==
{{Main|Byzantine bureaucracy and aristocracy}}


=== Language ===
{{further|Medieval Greek}}
{{Multiple image
{{Multiple image
| footer  =
| align             = right
| align   = right
| image1           = Mudil_Psalter.jpg
| direction = vertical
| width1           = 140
| image1 = Byzantine Empire Themata-750-en.svg
| alt1             = A photograph of two pages of a book written in a Greek script. The lower portions of both pages are damaged.
| width1 = 220
| caption1         =  
| alt1   = Map of Byzantine Empire showing the themes in circa 750
| image2           = Joshua_Roll.jpg
| caption1 = The ''themes'', {{Circa|750}}
| width2           = 146
| image2 = Byzantine Empire Themata-950-en.svg
| alt2             = A photograph of an illustrated manuscript written in Greek. At the left are two people who are standing talking to a person who is seated, while 5 soldiers listen. At the right are a group of soldiers going somewhere.
| width2 = 220
| caption2         =
| alt2   = Map of Byzantine Empire showing the themes in circa 950
| footer            = Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete [[psalter]] in the Coptic language ([[Coptic Museum]], Egypt, [[Coptic Cairo]]).<br />
| caption2 = The ''themes'', {{Circa|950}}
Right: The [[Joshua Roll]], a 10th-century illuminated Greek manuscript possibly made in Constantinople ([[Vatican Library]], Rome).
}}
}}


Largely based on Emperor [[Diocletian]]'s [[Dominate]] reforms in the late 3rd and early 4th centuries, the [[List of Byzantine emperors|monarch]] was the sole and [[Autocracy|absolute ruler]], and his power was regarded as having divine origin.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Yale Courses |title=08. Survival in the East |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfXChPJZLZE&pp=ygUfc3Vydml2YWwgb2YgdGhlIGJ5emFudGluZXMgeWFsZQ%3D%3D |website=Youtube |access-date=10 September 2023 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=259–260}}.</ref> From Justinian I on, the emperor was considered ''[[nomos empsychos]]'', the "living law", both lawgiver and administrator.<ref>{{Harvnb|Nicol|1988|pp=64–65}}.</ref> The [[Byzantine senate|senate]] had ceased to have real political and legislative authority but remained as an honorary council with titular members, resembling an emergency or ceremonial meeting made up of powerful Constantinopolitan aristocrats, very often friends and relatives of the emperor. By the end of the 8th century, a civil administration focused on the court was formed as part of a large-scale consolidation of power in the capital (the rise to pre-eminence of the position of ''[[sakellarios]]'' is related to this change).<ref name="L291">{{Harvnb|Louth|2005|p=291}}; {{Harvnb|Neville|2004|p=7}}.</ref> As a result of the different Orthodox and [[Diadochi|Hellenistic political]] philosophies, from Justinian onwards, an administrative simplification was given way for the emperor's easier management of the state as the sole administrator and lawgiver of the sacred [[Ecumene|Oikoumene]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Davies |first=Brian |date=March 1976 |title=Vladimir Lossky. In the Image and Likeness of God. Pp. 232. (St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1974.) No price given. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500009094 |journal=Religious Studies |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=125–128 |doi=10.1017/s0034412500009094 |s2cid=170429521 |issn=0034-4125 |access-date=9 March 2022 |archive-date=31 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220831173933/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/abs/vladimir-lossky-in-the-image-and-likeness-of-god-pp-232-st-vladimirs-seminary-press-1974-no-price-given/16D9DA937D987FBEA2C816A014E9180A |url-status=live }}</ref> Definitive powers began to be attached around single entities who acted as [[viceroy]]s, starting with the [[exarch|''exarchs'']] and their Justinianic-era predecessors ''[[stratelates]]'' who shared the extraordinary powers of the emperor in their respective districts and only answered to him, they also being appointed by the sovereign directly. The most important administrative reform, which probably started in the mid-7th century, was the creation of [[Theme (Byzantine district)|themes]], where civil and military administration were embodied in a single person, the ''[[strategos]],'' who, as the emperor's viceroy, shared his extraordinary powers in their respective "''thémata''", they too being also appointed by the emperor alone.<ref name="M60">{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=138–142}}; {{Harvnb|Mango|2007|p=60}}.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Heather |first1=Peter |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/978-0-85323-106-6 |title=Politics, Philosophy, and Empire in the Fourth Century |last2=Moncur |first2=David |date=January 2001 |publisher=Liverpool University Press |isbn=978-0-85323-106-6 |location=Liverpool |doi=10.3828/978-0-85323-106-6 |access-date=31 March 2022 |archive-date=31 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220831173932/https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/books/isbn/9781789628531 |url-status=live }}</ref>
[[Latin language|Latin]] and [[Greek language|Greek]] were the primary languages of the late Roman Empire, with the former prevalent in the west and the latter in the east.{{sfn|Horrocks|2008|p=778}} Although Latin was historically important in the military, legal system, and government, its use declined in Byzantine territories from 400 AD.{{sfnm|Horrocks|2010|1p=208|Rochette|2023|2pp=282–283}} Greek had begun to replace it even in those functions by the time of [[Justinian I]] ({{reign|527|565|link=no}}), who may have tried to arrest Latin's decline. Its extinction in the east was thereafter inevitable.{{sfnm|Horrocks|2008|1p=778|Rochette|2023|2pp=283–284}} A similar process of linguistic [[Hellenization]] occurred in Asia Minor, whose inhabitants had mostly abandoned their indigenous languages for Greek by early Byzantine times.{{sfn|Horrocks|2010|pp=208–209}} Still, much of the population of the empire would have known neither Latin nor Greek, especially in rural areas—their languages included [[Armenian language|Armenian]] in [[Byzantine Armenia]], [[Aramaic]] dialects such as [[Syriac language|Syriac]] in Mesopotamia and the Levant, [[Coptic language|Coptic]] in Egypt, [[Phoenician language|Phoenician]] on the Levant coast and in [[Carthage]], and [[Berber languages|Berber]] in rural North Africa.{{sfnm|Horrocks|2008|1pp=778–779|Horrocks|2010|2pp=207–210}}


Despite the occasionally derogatory use of the terms "Byzantine" and "[[Byzantinism]]", the Byzantine bureaucracy had a distinct ability for adapting to the empire's changing situations. The elaborate system of titulature and precedence gave the court prestige and influence. Officials were arranged in strict order around the emperor and depended upon the royal will for their ranks. There were also actual administrative jobs, but authority could be vested in individuals rather than offices.<ref name="L34">{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=157–158}}; {{Harvnb|Neville|2004|p=34}}.</ref>
The empire lost its linguistic diversity in the wars of the 7th and 8th centuries, becoming overwhelmingly Greek-speaking.{{sfn|Treadgold|2002|p=142}} During this troubled period, classical [[Attic Greek]]—one of the [[Register (sociolinguistics)|linguistic registers]] the Byzantine Greeks inherited—fell out of use, while the [[vernacular|everyday vernacular]] registers were still used.{{sfn|Browning|1982|p=51}} As the empire gained some stability from the 9th century onwards, and especially after the [[Komnenian restoration]], Attic Greek came back into fashion for written works. In a phenomenon called [[diglossia]], the gap between vernacular spoken Greek, which was rarely written in published works, and literary registers only spoken in formal contexts, became very wide.{{sfnm|Browning|1982|1p=51|Horrocks|2008|2pp=781–782}}


In the 8th and 9th centuries, civil service had constituted the clearest path to aristocratic status. However, beginning from the 9th century, the civil aristocracy was rivalled by an aristocracy of nobility. According to some studies of the Byzantine government, 11th-century politics were dominated by competition between the civil and the military aristocracy. During this period, Alexios I undertook important administrative reforms, including the creation of new courtly dignities and offices.<ref name="L13">{{Harvnb|Neville|2004|p=13}}.</ref>
During the [[Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty|Palaiologan period]], although classically written works remained the normal style, Western-inspired writers began to use more vernacular elements, especially for [[Romance (prose fiction)|romances]] or near-contemporary histories. One example is the ''[[Chronicle of the Morea]]'', probably written by a French immigrant who was ignorant of formal Greek literature and who incorporated spoken Greek into his work.{{sfnm|Horrocks|2008|1p=783|Horrocks|2010|2pp=216–218|3a1=Jeffreys|3a2=Mango|3y=2002|3pp=298–300}} All such written vernacular was in verse form, becoming the ancestor of [[modern Greek]] poetry, while prose remained classically written.{{sfnm|Browning|1982|1pp=51–52|2a1=Jeffreys|2a2=Mango|2y=2002|2p=299}}


=== Diplomacy ===
== Economy ==
{{Main|Byzantine diplomacy|Foreign relations of the Byzantine Empire}}
{{Main|Byzantine economy}}


[[File:John the Grammarian as ambassador before Theophilos and Mamun.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.15|The embassy of [[Patriarch John VII of Constantinople|John the Grammarian]] in 829, between the emperor [[Theophilos (emperor)|Theophilos]] and the Abbasid caliph [[Al-Ma'mun]] ]]
{{Further|Byzantine silk|Sino-Roman relations}}
 
After the fall of Rome, the key challenge to the empire was maintaining relations with its neighbours. When these nations set about forging formal political institutions, they were often modelled after Constantinople. Byzantine diplomacy managed to draw its neighbours into a network of international and inter-state relations.<ref name="N1">{{Harvnb|Neumann|2006|pp=869–871}}.</ref> This network revolved around treaty-making and included the welcoming of the new ruler into the family of kings and the assimilation of Byzantine social attitudes, values and institutions.<ref>{{Harvnb|Chrysos|1992|p=35}}.</ref> Whereas classical writers are fond of making ethical and legal distinctions between peace and war, Byzantines regarded diplomacy as a form of war by other means. For example, a Bulgarian threat could be countered by providing money to the Kievan Rus'.<ref name="Ant">{{Harvnb|Antonucci|1993|pp=11–13}}.</ref>
 
[[File:Sketch of Emperor John VIII Palaeologus.jpeg|thumb|upright=0.8|Italian sketch of Emperor [[John VIII Palaiologos|John VIII]] during his visit in [[Ferrara]] and [[Florence]] in 1438]]
 
Diplomacy was understood to have an intelligence-gathering function on top of its pure political function. The [[Bureau of Barbarians]] in Constantinople handled matters of protocol and record-keeping for any issues related to the "[[barbarian]]s", and thus had, perhaps, a basic intelligence function itself.<ref>{{Harvnb|Antonucci|1993|pp=11–13}}; {{Harvnb|Seeck|1876|pp=31–33}}</ref> [[J. B. Bury|John B. Bury]] believes that the office exercised supervision over all foreigners visiting Constantinople, and that they were under the supervision of the [[Logothetes tou dromou]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Bury|Philotheus|1911|p=93}}.</ref> While on the surface a protocol office—its main duty was to ensure foreign envoys were properly cared for and received sufficient state funds for their maintenance, and it kept all the official translators—it probably had a security function as well.<ref>{{Harvnb|Dennis|1985|p=125}}.</ref>
 
Byzantines availed themselves of several diplomatic practices. For example, embassies to the capital often stayed on for years. A member of other royal houses would routinely be requested to stay on in Constantinople as a potential hostage as well as a useful pawn in case political conditions changed. Another key practice was to overwhelm visitors by sumptuous displays.<ref name="N1" /> According to [[Dimitri Obolensky]], the preservation of the ancient civilisation in Europe could be accredited to the skill and resourcefulness of Byzantine diplomacy, which remains one of Byzantium's lasting contributions to the history of Europe.<ref name="O3">{{Harvnb|Obolensky|1994|p=3}}.</ref>
 
=== Law ===
{{Main|Byzantine law}}
In 438, the ''[[Codex Theodosianus]]'', named after Theodosius II, codified Byzantine law. It went into force in the Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire as well as in the Western Roman Empire. It summarised the laws and gave direction on interpretation. Under the reign of Justinian I it was [[Tribonian]], a notable jurist, who supervised the revision of the legal code known today as the {{Lang|la|[[Corpus Juris Civilis]]}}. Justinian's reforms had a clear effect on the evolution of [[jurisprudence]], with his ''Corpus'' becoming the basis for [[medieval Roman law|revived Roman law]] in the Western world, while Leo III's ''Ecloga'' influenced the formation of legal institutions in the Slavic world.<ref>{{Harvnb|Troianos|Velissaropoulou-Karakosta|1997|p=340}}</ref> In the 10th century, Leo VI the Wise achieved the complete codification of the whole of Byzantine law in Greek with the ''[[Basilika]]'', which became the foundation of all subsequent Byzantine law codes with an influence extending through to modern Balkan legal codes.<ref name="Browning-1992-97-98" />
 
== Science and medicine ==
{{Main|Byzantine science}}
{{See also|Byzantine medicine|4=List of Byzantine inventions|Byzantine philosophy}}
[[File:20131203_Istanbul_048.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|Interior of the [[Hagia Sophia]], the patriarchal [[basilica]] in Constantinople designed 537 by [[Isidore of Miletus]], the first compiler of Archimedes' various works. The influence of Archimedes' principles of solid geometry is evident.]]
[[Byzantine science]] played an important and crucial role in the [[Greek contributions to the Islamic world|transmission of classical knowledge]] to the [[Muslim world|Islamic world]] and to [[Italian Renaissance|Renaissance Italy]].<ref>{{cite web|author=George Saliba|author-link=George Saliba|title=Islamic Science and the Making of Renaissance Europe|website=[[Library of Congress]]|date=2006-04-27|url=https://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=3883|access-date=2008-03-01|archive-date=29 June 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060629204411/https://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=3883|url-status=live}}</ref>{{sfn|Robins|1993|p=8}} Many of the most distinguished classical scholars held high office in the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]].<ref>The faculty was composed exclusively of philosophers, scientists, rhetoricians, and [[philology|philologists]]; {{cite book | last=Tatakes |first=Vasileios N. |author2=Moutafakis, Nicholas J. | title=Byzantine Philosophy | year=2003 | publisher=Hackett Publishing|isbn=978-0-87220-563-5|pages=189}}</ref>


The [[University of Constantinople|Imperial University of Constantinople]], sometimes known as the ''University of the Palace Hall of Magnaura'' ({{lang-el|Πανδιδακτήριον τῆς Μαγναύρας}}), was an [[Eastern Roman Empire|Eastern Roman]] educational institution that could trace its corporate origins to AD 425, when Emperor Theodosius II founded the ''Pandidakterion'' ({{lang-grc-x-byzant|Πανδιδακτήριον}}).<ref>"The Formation of the Hellenic Christian Mind" by [[Demetrios Constantelos]], {{ISBN|978-0-89241-588-5}}: "The fifth century marked a definite turning point in Byzantine higher education. Theodosios ΙΙ founded in 425 a major university with 31 chairs for law, philosophy, medicine, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, music, rhetoric and other subjects. Fifteen chairs were assigned to Latin and 16 to Greek. The university was reorganized by Michael III (842–867) and flourished down to the fourteenth century".</ref> The Pandidakterion was refounded in 1046<ref>John H. Rosser, ''Historical Dictionary of Byzantium'', Scarecrow Press, 2001, p. xxx.</ref> by [[Constantine IX Monomachos]] who created the Departments of Law (Διδασκαλεῖον τῶν Νόμων) and Philosophy (Γυμνάσιον).<ref>Aleksandr Petrovich Kazhdan, Annabel Jane Wharton, ''Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries'', University of California Press, 1985, p. 122.</ref> At the time various economic schools, colleges, polytechnics, libraries and fine arts academies also operated in the city of Constantinople. And a few scholars have gone so far as to call the Pandidakterion the first "university" in the world.<ref name="Loukaki 1997, 1553">Marina Loukaki: "Université. Domaine byzantin", in: ''[[Dictionnaire encyclopédique du Moyen Âge]]'', Vol. 2, Éditions du Cerf, Paris, 1997, {{ISBN|978-2-204-05866-7}}, p.&nbsp;1553: {{blockquote|Le nom "université" désigne au Moyen Âge occidental une organisation corporative des élèves et des maîtres, avec ses fonctions et privilèges, qui cultive un ensemble d'études supérieures. L'existence d'une telle institution est fort contestée pour Byzance. Seule l'école de Constantinople sous Théodose Il peut être prise pour une institution universitaire. Par la loi de 425, l'empereur a établi l'"université de Constantinople", avec 31 professeurs rémunérés par l'État qui jouissaient du monopole des cours publics.}}</ref>
The empire's geographic and maritime advantages reduced the costs of transporting goods and facilitated trade, making it a key driver of economic growth from antiquity and through the post-classical period.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=473|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2p=13}} Infrastructure, including roads, public buildings, and the legal system, supported trade and other economic activities.{{sfn|Laiou|Morrisson|2007|p=24}} Regions like Asia Minor, the Aegean islands, Egypt, the Levant, and Africa thrived as mature economic centres despite political challenges and military insecurities.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=467|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2p=246}} From the mid-6th century onward, plagues, invasions, and wars caused populations and economies to decline, leading to the collapse of the ancient economy.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1pp=472, 474, 479|Laiou|2002c|2p=698|3a1=Laiou|3a2=Morrisson|3y=2007|3p=24}} Major cities like Constantinople, Antioch, [[Alexandria]], and [[Thessaloniki]] continued to support substantial populations exceeding 100,000, while the countryside transitioned into fortified settlements.{{sfnm|Laiou|2002a|1p=177|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=25-26}} These rural areas developed into hamlets and villages, reflecting an economic shift between historical periods towards more efficient land use.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=465, 471|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=25-26, 232}}


The writings of [[classical antiquity]] were cultivated and preserved in Byzantium. Therefore, Byzantine science was in every period closely connected with [[ancient philosophy]], and [[metaphysics]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Anastos|1962|p=409}}.</ref> In the field of engineering [[Isidore of Miletus]], the Greek mathematician and architect of the Hagia Sophia, produced the first compilation of [[Archimedes]]' works {{Circa|530}}, and it is through this manuscript tradition, kept alive by the school of mathematics and engineering founded {{Circa|850}} during the "Byzantine Renaissance" by [[Leo the Mathematician]], that such works are known today (see [[Archimedes Palimpsest]]).<ref>Alexander Jones, [https://www.ams.org/notices/200505/rev-jones.pdf "Book Review, Archimedes Manuscript"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220302190047/https://www.ams.org/notices/200505/rev-jones.pdf |date=2 March 2022 }} American Mathematical Society, May 2005.</ref>
Low population density prompted emperors to encourage migration and resettlement, stimulating agriculture and demographic growth.{{sfn|Laiou|Morrisson|2007|pp=44-46}} By the 9th century, the economy began to revive, marked by increased agricultural production and urban expansion.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1pp=473-474|Laiou|2002a|2pp=269-270}} Advances in science, technical knowledge, and literacy gave the empire a competitive edge over its neighbours.{{sfn|Laiou|Morrisson|2007|pp=19-22, 24}} The 11th and 12th centuries witnessed consistent and rapid population growth, marking the peak of this revival.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=476|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=90-92}} Italian merchants, particularly the Venetians, Genoese, and Pisans, took control of international trade, thus reducing the influence of native merchants.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1pp=473-476|Laiou|2002a|2pp=25, 402}} The political system grew increasingly extractive and authoritarian, contributing to the empire's collapse in 1204.{{sfnm|Laiou|2002a|1p=23|Laiou|2002b|2p=1164|3a1=Laiou|3a2=Morrisson|3y=2007|3p=233}}


Alexandrian philosopher [[John Philoponus]] was the first to question [[Aristotelian physics]]. Unlike Aristotle, who based his physics on verbal argument, Philoponus relied on observation. Philoponus' criticism of Aristotelian principles of physics was an inspiration for [[Galileo Galilei]]'s refutation of Aristotelian physics during the [[Scientific Revolution]] many centuries later, as Galileo cites Philoponus substantially in his works.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wildberg |first=Christian |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/philoponus/ |title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=8 March 2018 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |via=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=8 March 2018 |archive-date=22 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190822110331/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/philoponus/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="lindberg162">Lindberg, David. (1992) ''The Beginnings of Western Science''. University of Chicago Press. p.&nbsp;162.</ref>
The fall of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1204 destroyed centuries of its wealth.{{sfn|Magdalino|2002b|p=535}} Large landholdings were confiscated, and the empire fragmented into smaller rump states ruled by competing factions, making governance inefficient and increasing the costs of doing business.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=739|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=167-168}} The state gradually lost control over trade practices, price regulations, the outflow of precious metals, and possibly even the minting of coins.{{Sfn|Matschke|2002|pp=805–806}} Italian merchants further dominated trade as the events of 1204 opened the Black Sea to Western merchants, permanently altering the empire's fortunes.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=477|Matschke|2002|2pp=771-772|3a1=Laiou|3a2=Morrisson|3y=2007|3p=203}} Farmers and manufacturers increasingly produced goods for local use and were affected by the insecurity of constant warfare.{{sfnm|Matschke|2002|1p=779|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2p=168}} Despite these challenges, the empire's mixed economy (characterised by state interventions, public works, and market liberalisation){{sfn|Laiou|2002c|p=754}} remained a model of medieval economic adaptability, even as it deteriorated under external pressures.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=471|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=232-235}}


The Byzantines pioneered the concept of the hospital as an institution offering medical care and the possibility of a cure for the patients, as a reflection of the ideals of Christian charity, rather than merely a place to die.<ref>Lindberg, David. (1992) ''The Beginnings of Western Science''. University of Chicago Press. p. 349.</ref>
== Arts and sciences ==


[[File:Liquid fire granades Chania.jpg|thumb|upright|left|Ceramic grenades that were filled with Greek fire, surrounded by [[caltrop]]s, 10th–12th century, [[National Historical Museum (Greece)|National Historical Museum]], Athens, Greece]]Greek fire, an incendiary weapon which could even burn on water, is attributed to the Byzantines. It played a crucial role in the empire's victory over the Umayyad Caliphate during the siege of Constantinople (717–718).<ref>{{Cite web |title=Greek fire &#124; weaponry |url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/Greek-fire |website=Encyclopedia Britannica |access-date=1 March 2018 |archive-date=10 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180310022524/https://www.britannica.com/technology/Greek-fire |url-status=live }}</ref> The discovery is attributed to [[Callinicus of Heliopolis]] from Syria who fled during the Arab conquest of Syria. However, it has also been argued that no single person invented Greek fire, but rather, that it was "invented by the chemists in Constantinople who had inherited the discoveries of the Alexandrian chemical school...".<ref name="auto">Partington, J.R. (1999). "A History of Greek Fire and Gunpowder". The Johns Hopkins University Press. p.&nbsp;13.</ref>
===Art and architecture===
{{main|Byzantine art|Byzantine architecture}}


In the final century of the empire, [[astronomy]] and other [[mathematics|mathematical sciences]] were taught in Trebizond; medicine attracted the interest of almost all scholars.<ref name="TM189">{{Harvnb|Tatakes|Moutafakis|2003|p=189}}.</ref> The Fall of Constantinople in 1453 fuelled the era later commonly known as the "[[Italian Renaissance]]". During this period, [[Greek scholars in the Renaissance|refugee Byzantine scholars]] were principally responsible for carrying, in person and writing, ancient Greek grammatical, literary studies, mathematical, and astronomical knowledge to early Renaissance Italy.<ref>{{Harvnb|Robins|1993|p=8}}.</ref> They also brought with them classical learning and texts on botany, medicine and zoology, as well as the works of Dioscorides and John Philoponus' criticism of Aristotelian physics.<ref name="lindberg162" />[[File:Tribonian bas-relief in the U.S. House of Representatives chamber.jpg|thumb|upright|right|Bas-relief plaque of [[Tribonian]] in the Chamber of the [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]] in the [[United States Capitol]]]]
[[File:Argyropoulos (detail) Calling of the Apostles.JPG|right|thumb|140px|Many [[Greek scholars in the Renaissance|refugee Byzantine scholars]] fled to North Italy in the 1400s, like [[John Argyropoulos]] (1415–1487).]]
== Culture ==
=== Religion ===
{{Main|Christianity as the Roman state religion|Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople}}{{See also|Byzantine Rite}}[[File:Hagia Sophia in Istanbul (focused on the original Roman building).jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|As a symbol and expression of the universal prestige of the [[Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople|Patriarchate of Constantinople]], [[Justinian I|Justinian]] built the Church of the Holy Wisdom of God, [[Hagia Sophia]], which was completed in the short period of four and a half years (532–537).]]
[[File:Fethiye_Museum_9607.jpg|thumb|250px|Mosaic of Jesus in [[Pammakaristos Church]], Istanbul]]
[[File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg|thumbnail|200px|Triumphal arch mosaics of [[Jesus Christ]] and the Apostles. In [[Basilica of San Vitale]] in [[Ravenna]], Italy.]]
The Byzantine Empire was a [[theocracy]], said to be ruled by [[God in Christianity|God]] working through the emperor. Jennifer Fretland VanVoorst argues, "The Byzantine Empire became a theocracy in the sense that Christian values and ideals were the foundation of the empire's political ideals and heavily entwined with its political goals."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jennifer Fretland VanVoorst |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RyOoBQiCm88C&pg=PA14 |title=The Byzantine Empire |publisher=Capstone |date=2012 |isbn=978-0-7565-4565-9 |page=14 |access-date=14 August 2015 |archive-date=29 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160629114102/https://books.google.com/books?id=RyOoBQiCm88C&pg=PA14 |url-status=live }}</ref> Steven Runciman says in his book:
{{blockquote|The constitution of the Byzantine Empire was based on the conviction that it was the earthly copy of the Kingdom of Heaven. Just as God ruled in Heaven, so the Emperor, made in his image, should rule on earth and carry out his commandments&nbsp;... It saw itself as a universal empire. Ideally, it should embrace all the peoples of the Earth who, ideally, should all be members of the one true Christian Church, its own Orthodox Church. Just as man was made in God's image, so man's kingdom on Earth was made in the image of the Kingdom of Heaven.<ref>{{Harvnb|Runciman|2004|pp=1–2, 162–163}}.</ref>}}
The survival of the empire in the East assured an active role of the emperor in the affairs of the Church. The Byzantine state inherited from pagan times the administrative and financial routine of administering religious affairs, and this routine was applied to the [[Christian Church]]. Following the pattern set by [[Eusebius]] of Caesarea, the Byzantines viewed the emperor as a representative or messenger of [[Jesus|Christ]], responsible particularly for the propagation of Christianity among pagans, and for the "externals" of the religion, such as administration and finances. As [[Cyril Mango]] points out, the Byzantine political thinking can be summarised in the motto "One God, one empire, one religion".<ref name="M108">{{Harvnb|Mango|2007|p=108}}.</ref>
Constantinople is generally considered the "cradle of Orthodox [[Role of Christianity in civilization|Christian civilization]]".<ref>{{cite book|title=Christianity: Religions of the World|first=Ann Marie |last=B. Bahr|year= 2009| isbn=978-1-4381-0639-7| page =139|publisher=Infobase Publishing|quote= }}</ref> The imperial role in the affairs of the Church never developed into a fixed, legally defined system.<ref name="M14">{{Harvnb|Meyendorff|1982|p=13}}.</ref> Additionally, the decline of Rome and the internal dissension in the other Eastern patriarchates, made the Church of Constantinople, between the 6th and 11th centuries, the richest and most influential centre of [[Christendom]].<ref name="M19">{{Harvnb|Meyendorff|1982|p=19}}.</ref> Even when the empire was reduced to only a shadow of its former self, the Church continued to exercise significant influence both inside and outside of the imperial frontiers. As [[George Ostrogorsky]] points out:
{{blockquote|The [[Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople|Patriarchate of Constantinople]] remained the centre of the Orthodox world, with subordinate [[Metropolitan bishop|metropolitan sees]] and archbishoprics in the territory of Asia Minor and the Balkans, now lost to Byzantium, as well as in [[Caucasus]], Russia and Lithuania. The Church remained the most stable element in the Byzantine Empire.<ref name="M130">{{Harvnb|Meyendorff|1982|p=130}}.</ref>}}
Byzantine monasticism especially came to be an "ever-present feature" of the empire, with monasteries becoming "powerful landowners and a voice to be listened to in imperial politics".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mark Cartwright |date=18 December 2017 |title=Byzantine Monasticism |url=https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1163/byzantine-monasticism/ |website=World History Encyclopedia |access-date=20 April 2021 |archive-date=20 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210420182244/https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1163/byzantine-monasticism/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
The official state Christian doctrine was determined by the [[first seven ecumenical councils]], and it was then the emperor's duty to impose it on his subjects. An imperial decree of 388, which was later incorporated into the ''Codex Justinianeus'', orders the population of the empire "to assume the name of Catholic Christians", and regards all those who will not abide by the law as "mad and foolish persons"; as followers of "heretical dogmas".<ref>[http://www.uwyo.edu/lawlib/blume-justinian/ajc-edition-1/_files/docs/book-1pdf/book%201-1.pdf Justinian Code: Book 1, Title 1] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210309035557/http://www.uwyo.edu/lawlib/blume-justinian/ajc-edition-1/_files/docs/book-1pdf/book%201-1.pdf |date=9 March 2021 }}; {{Harvnb|Blume|2008|loc=Headnote C. 1.1}}; {{Harvnb|Mango|2007|p=108}}.</ref>
Despite imperial decrees and the stringent stance of the [[state church of the Roman Empire|state church]], which came to be known as the Eastern Orthodox Church or [[Eastern Christianity]], the Eastern Orthodox Church never represented all Christians in Byzantium. Mango believes that in the early stages of the empire, the "mad and foolish persons"—those labelled "[[heretics]]" by the state church—were the majority of the population.<ref name="M109">{{Harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=108–109}}.</ref> Besides the [[paganism|pagans]] who existed until the end of the 6th century, and the [[History of the Jews in the Byzantine Empire|Jews]], there were many followers—sometimes even emperors—of various Christian doctrines, such as [[Nestorianism]], [[Monophysitism]], [[Arianism]], and [[Paulicianism]], whose teachings were in some opposition to the main theological doctrine as determined by the Ecumenical Councils.<ref>{{Harvnb|Blume|2008|loc=Headnote C. 1.1}}; {{Harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=108–109, 115–125}}.</ref>
Another division among Christians occurred, when Leo III ordered the destruction of icons throughout the empire. This led to a significant religious crisis, which ended in the mid-9th century with the restoration of icons. During the same period, a new wave of pagans emerged in the Balkans, originating mainly from Slavic people. These were gradually [[Christianization|Christianised]], and by Byzantium's late stages, Eastern Orthodoxy represented most Christians and, in general, most people in what remained of the empire.<ref name="M115">{{Harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=115–125}}.</ref>
Jews were a significant minority in the Byzantine state throughout its history, and according to Roman law, they constituted a legally recognised religious group. In the early Byzantine period they were generally tolerated, but then periods of tensions and persecutions ensued. In any case, after the Arab conquests the majority of Jews found themselves outside the empire; those left inside the Byzantine borders apparently lived in relative peace from the 10th century onwards.<ref name="M114">{{Harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=111–114}}.</ref>
=== The arts ===
==== Art ====
{{See also|Byzantine dress}}
{{multiple image
{{multiple image
| perrow = 2
| perrow           = 2
| total_width = 400
| total_width       = 340
| align =  
| image1            = Spas vsederzhitel sinay.jpg
| image1 = Aya_Sophia_(7144824757).jpg
| image2            = Hosios Loukas Katholikon (nave, South-West squinch) - Baptism - detail 02.jpg
| image2 = Istanbul Oct 2019 12 20 46 794000.jpeg
| image3            = Meister von Nerezi 001.jpg
| image3 = Deesis mosaic Hagia Sophia.jpg
| image4            = Ivoire Barberini - Musée du Louvre Objets d'art OA 9063 ; MND 211.jpg
| image4 = Hagia Sophia Southwestern entrance mosaics 2.jpg
| image5            = Hagia Sophia in Istanbul (focused on the original Roman building).jpg
| footer = The [[Hagia Sophia]] ([[Istanbul]], Turkey), 537, by [[Anthemius of Tralles]] and [[Isidore of Miletus]]
| footer           = Clockwise, from top left:
* [[Christ Pantocrator (Sinai)|Christ Pantocrator]] icon, 6th century, [[Sinai Monastery]]
* [[Hosios Loukas]] mosaics, detail, early 11th century
* [[Barberini ivory]], an early 6th-century ivory diptych{{sfn|Cormack|2018|p=39}}
* The [[Hagia Sophia]] exterior
* ''Dead Christ and Mourners'', {{circa|1164}}, [[Church of Saint Panteleimon, Gorno Nerezi|Gorno Nerezi]]{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 3}}
}}
}}
Surviving [[Byzantine art]] is mostly religious and with exceptions at certain periods is highly conventionalised, following traditional models that translate carefully controlled church theology into artistic terms. Painting in [[fresco]], [[illuminated manuscript]]s and on wood panel and, especially in earlier periods, mosaic were the main media, and figurative [[sculpture]] very rare except for small [[ivory carving|carved ivories]]. Manuscript painting preserved to the end some of the classical realist tradition that was missing in larger works.<ref>{{Harvnb|Rice|1968}}; {{Harvnb|Weitzmann|1982}}.</ref> Byzantine art was highly prestigious and sought-after in Western Europe, where it maintained a continuous influence on [[medieval art]] until near the end of the period. This was especially so in Italy, where Byzantine styles persisted in modified form through the 12th century, and became formative influences on [[Italian Renaissance]] art. But few incoming influences affected the Byzantine style. With the expansion of the Eastern Orthodox Church, Byzantine forms and styles spread throughout the Orthodox world and beyond.<ref>{{Harvnb|Rice|1968|loc=Chapters 15–17}}; {{Harvnb|Weitzmann|1982|loc=Chapters 2–7}}; {{Harvnb|Evans|2004|pp=389–555}}.</ref>


Influences from [[Byzantine architecture]], particularly in religious buildings, can be found in diverse regions from Egypt and Arabia to [[Neo-Byzantine architecture in the Russian Empire|Russia]] and Romania. Byzantine architecture is known for the use of [[dome]]s, and [[pendentive]] architecture was invented in the Byzantine Empire. It also often featured marble columns, [[coffer]]ed ceilings and sumptuous decoration, including the extensive use of [[mosaic]]s with golden backgrounds. The building material used by Byzantine architects was no longer marble, which was very appreciated by the Ancient Greeks. They used mostly stone and brick, and also thin [[alabaster]] sheets for windows. Mosaics were used to cover brick walls, and any other surface where fresco would not resist. Good examples of mosaics from the proto-Byzantine era are in [[Hagios Demetrios]] in [[Thessaloniki]] (Greece), the [[Basilica of Sant'Apollinare Nuovo]] and the [[Basilica of San Vitale]], both in Ravenna (Italy), and Hagia Sophia in [[Istanbul]]. Greco-Roman temples and Byzantine churches differ substantially in terms of their exterior and interior aspect. In Antiquity, the exterior was the most important part of the temple, because in the interior, where the cult statue of the deity to whom the temple was built was kept, only the priest had access. The ceremonies here held outside, and what the worshipers view was the facade of the temple, consisting of columns, with an [[entablature]] and two pediments. Meanwhile, Christian liturgies were held in the interior of the churches, the exterior usually having little to no ornamentation.<ref>{{cite book|last1=George D. Hurmuziadis|title=Cultura Greciei|date=1979|publisher=Editura științifică și enciclopedică|page=92 & 93|language=ro}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Hopkins|first1=Owen|title=Architectural Styles A Visual Guide|date=2014|publisher=Laurence King|isbn=978-1-78067-163-5|page=17|url=|language=en}}</ref>
Subjects in [[Byzantine art]] were primarily [[Christian art|Christian]] and typically non-naturalistic in their representation.{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ paras. 2 and 13}} Emerging from both the [[Early Christian art and architecture|earliest Christian]] and [[Late Antique art]],{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=2|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=11–12}} many early examples were lost amid the [[Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire|Roman Persecutions]]; the fragmented mosaics of the 3rd-century [[Dura-Europos church]] are a unique exception.{{sfn|Rodley|1994|pp=12–14}} Such [[Byzantine mosaics]], known for their [[gold ground]] style, became a hallmark of the empire, displaying both secular and sacred themes in diverse places, including churches ([[Basilica of San Vitale]]), the circus ([[Hippodrome of Constantinople]]), and the [[Great Palace of Constantinople]].{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=34|2a1=James|2y=2003|2loc=§ paras. 3–4}} The early 6th-century reign of Justinian&nbsp;I saw systemic developments: [[religious art]] came to dominate, and once-popular public marble and bronze [[monumental sculpture]] fell out of favour due to [[pagan]] associations.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1pp=32–33, 56–57|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2p=14}} Justinian commissioned the monumental [[Hagia Sophia]] church, and its influential elements became architectural hallmarks for the empire: the immense size, large [[dome]], innovative use of [[pendentive]]s and highly decorative interior were imitated as far north as the [[Cathedral of Saint Sophia, Novgorod|Cathedral of Saint Sophia]] in [[Novgorod]] and the [[Saint Sophia Cathedral, Kyiv|Saint Sophia Cathedral]] in [[Kiev]]<!--See WP:KIEV-->.{{sfnm|1a1=James|1y=2003|1loc=§ para. 10|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=33–40|3a1=Curl|3a2=Wilson|3y=2021|3loc=§ paras. 3 and 5}} The Hagia Sophia's creators, the engineer-architects [[Isidore of Miletus]] and [[Anthemius of Tralles]], are uniquely esteemed;{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=67}} most Byzantine artists were unrecorded and typically deemed to have little importance.{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 7}}


<gallery widths="150px" heights="150px">
Smaller-scale art flourished throughout the entire Byzantine period: costly [[ivory carving]]s—often as diptychs ([[Barberini ivory]]) or triptychs ([[Harbaville Triptych]])—featured imperial commemorations or religious scenes and were particularly valued, as were [[metalwork]] and [[Byzantine enamel|enamel]]s.{{sfnm|1a1=James|1y=2003|1loc=§ para. 4|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2p=39}} Other costly objects included [[Byzantine illuminated manuscripts|illuminated manuscripts]], which were lavishly illustrated for a wide range of texts, and [[Byzantine silk|silk]]s, often dyed in the prized [[imperial purple]]; both became highly popular in Western Europe.{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ paras. 4–5}} The rise of small, portable [[icon]] paintings, used for both public and private religious worship, grew increasingly controversial.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1pp=101–102|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2p=2}} During two periods of [[Byzantine Iconoclasm]] (726–843), possibly influenced by [[Aniconism in Islam|Islamic prohibitions on religious images]],{{sfn|Lowden|1997|pp=147–148}} icons were suppressed and enormous amounts of figurative religious art was destroyed.{{sfn|Matthews|Platt|1997|p=185}} [[Iconoclast]]s condemned their use, likening them to pagan [[idolatry]] and ascribing recent [[Byzantine–Arab wars (780–1180)#Raids under the last Umayyads and the rise of Iconoclasm|Umayyad defeats]] as [[divine retribution]] for their use. [[Iconophile]]s eventually prevailed, maintaining their essential use for [[veneration]], considered distinct from [[worship]], and found precedent in [[gospel]] references.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1pp=115–116|2a1=Lowden|2y=1997|2pp=147–151}}
"The good Shepherd" mosaic - Mausoleum of Galla Placidia.jpg|Christ as the [[Good Shepherd]]; {{circa}} 425–430; mosaic; width: {{circa}} 3 m; [[Mausoleum of Galla Placidia]] ([[Ravenna]], Italy)<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fortenberry|first1=Diane|title=THE ART MUSEUM |date=2017|publisher=Phaidon|isbn=978-0-7148-7502-6|page=108|language=en}}</ref>


KHM Wien Kaiserin Ariadne X 39.jpg|Diptych Leaf with a Byzantine Empress; 6th century; ivory with traces of gilding and leaf; height: {{cvt|26.5|cm}}; [[Kunsthistorisches Museum]] ([[Vienna]], Austria)<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fortenberry|first1=Diane|title=THE ART MUSEUM |date=2017|publisher=Phaidon|isbn=978-0-7148-7502-6|page=114|language=en}}</ref>
[[Macedonian art (Byzantine)|Post-iconoclast Macedonian art]] (867–1056) saw a [[Macedonian Renaissance|cultural renaissance]], and many artworks from this period survive.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=132|2a1=Lowden|2y=1997|2pp=187–188}} Subjects and styles became standardised, particularly [[cross-in-square]] churches, and already-existing frontality and [[symmetry]] evolved into a dominant artistic aesthetic, observable in the small [[Pala d'Oro]] enamel and the large mosaics of the [[Hosios Loukas]], [[Daphni Monastery|Daphni]], and [[Nea Moni of Chios|Nea Moni]] monasteries.{{sfnm|1a1=James|1y=2003|1loc=§ para. 3|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=146–147}} The subsequent Komnenos-Angelos periods (1081–1204) saw increased imperial patronage, alongside figurative artwork of increased emotional expression (''Dead Christ and Mourners'', {{circa|1164}}).{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 3}} Byzantine artistic influence spread widely to [[Norman–Arab–Byzantine culture|Norman Sicily]] (the ''[[Madrid Skylitzes]]'') and Venice (the mosaics of [[St Mark's Basilica]]).{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 3}} Serbian churches flourished, as three successive [[Medieval Serbian architecture|schools of architecture]]—[[Raška architectural school|Raška]] (1170–1282), [[Serbo-Byzantine architecture|Byzantine Serbia]] (1282–1355), and [[Morava architectural school|Morava]] (1355–1489)—combined a [[Romanesque architecture|Romanesque]] aesthetic with increasingly voluminous decorations and domes.{{sfn|Curl|Wilson|2021|loc=§ para. 7}} As smaller [[Palaeologan Renaissance#Art and architecture|Palaeologan artworks]] (1261–1453) gained [[relic]] status in Western Europe—many looted in the 1204 Fourth Crusade—they greatly influenced the [[Italo-Byzantine]] style of [[Cimabue]], [[Duccio]], and later [[Giotto]]; the latter is traditionally regarded by art historians as the inaugurator of [[Italian Renaissance painting]].{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=166|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=159, 186|3a1=Andronikou|3y=2022|3pp=2–4}}


Officina costantinopolitana, tesoro di asyut (egitto), V-VI sec ca. 01 collier.JPG|Collier; late 6th–7th century; gold, an [[emerald]], a [[sapphire]], [[amethyst]]s and [[pearl]]s; diameter: {{cvt|23|cm}}; from a [[Constantinopol]]itan workshop; [[Antikensammlung Berlin]] ([[Berlin]], Germany)<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fortenberry|first1=Diane|title=THE ART MUSEUM |date=2017|publisher=Phaidon|isbn=978-0-7148-7502-6|page=115|language=en}}</ref>
=== Literature ===
{{Main|Byzantine literature}}


Byzantium, Constantinople, 11th century - Gospel Book with Commentaries - 1942.152 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tif|Page of the Gospel Book with Commentaries: Portrait of Mark; 1000–1100; ink, [[tempera]], gold, [[vellum]] and leather binding; sheet: {{cvt|28 x 23|cm}}; [[Cleveland Museum of Art]] ([[Cleveland]], [[Ohio]], US)
[[Byzantine literature]] concerns all [[Greek literature]] from the [[Middle Ages]].{{sfn|Browning|2022|loc=§ para. 1}} Although the empire was [[Languages of the Roman Empire|linguistically diverse]], the vast majority of extant texts are in [[medieval Greek]],{{sfn|Papaioannou|2021a|pp=1–2, 5–7}} in two [[Diglossia|diglossic]] variants: a scholarly form based on [[Attic Greek]], and a [[vernacular]] based on [[Koine Greek]].{{sfn|Browning|1991a}} Most contemporary scholars consider all medieval Greek texts to be literature,{{sfn|Papaioannou|2021a|p=10}} but some offer varying constraints.{{sfnm|1a1=Kazhdan|1y=1999|1p=1|2a1=van Dieten|2y=1980|2pp=101–105}} The literature's early period ({{circa|330–650}}) was dominated by the competing cultures of [[Hellenistic period|Hellenism]], [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Christianity]] and [[Religion in ancient Rome|Paganism]].{{sfnm|1a1=Browning|1y=2022|1loc=§ paras. 1–2|2a1=Kaldellis|2y=2021|2pp=162–163}} The [[Church Fathers#Greek Fathers|Greek Church Fathers]]—educated in an Ancient Greek [[rhetoric]] tradition—sought to synthesise these influences.{{sfn|Browning|2022|loc=§ para. 1}} Important early writers include [[John Chrysostom]], [[Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite]] and [[Procopius]], all of whom aimed to reinvent older forms to fit the empire.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} Theological [[miracle]] stories were particularly innovative and popular;{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} the ''[[Sayings of the Desert Fathers]]'' (''Apophthegmata Patrum'') were copied in nearly every Byzantine monastery.{{sfn|Martín|2021|p=685}} During the [[Byzantine Dark Ages]] ({{circa|650–800|lk=no}}), production of literature mostly stopped, though some important theologians were active, such as [[Maximus the Confessor]], [[Germanus I of Constantinople]] and [[John of Damascus]].{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}}


Byzantium, Constantinople - Icon of the New Testament Trinity - 2016.32 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tif|Icon of the New Testament Trinity; {{Circa|1450}}; tempera and gold on wood panel (poplar); Cleveland Museum of Art
The subsequent cultural Macedonian Renaissance ({{circa|800–1000|lk=no}}; the "Encyclopedism period") saw a renewed proliferation of literature and revived the earlier Hellenic-Christian synthesis.{{sfn|Browning|2022|loc=§ para. 1}} Works by [[Homer]], [[List of ancient Greek philosophers|Ancient Greek philosophers]] and [[Greek tragedy|tragedians]] were translated, and [[hagiography]] was heavily reorganised.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} After this early flowering of monastic literature, there was a dearth until [[Symeon the New Theologian]] in the late 10th century.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} A new generation ({{circa|1000–1250|lk=no}}), including Symeon, [[Michael Psellos]] and [[Theodore Prodromos]], rejected the Encyclopedist emphasis on order, and were interested in individual-focused ideals variously concerning [[Christian mysticism|mysticism]], [[authorial voice]], heroism, humour and love.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|pp=1236–1237}} This included the Hellenistic-inspired [[Byzantine romance]] and [[chivalry|chivalric]] approaches in rhetoric, historiography and the influential epic ''[[Digenes Akritas]]''.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} The empire's final centuries saw a renewal of hagiography and increased Western influence, leading to mass Greek to Latin translations.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1237}} Authors such as [[Gemistos Plethon]] and [[Bessarion]] exemplified a new focus on human [[vice]]s alongside the preservation of classical traditions, the latter greatly influenced the [[Italian Renaissance]].{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1237}}
</gallery>


==== Literature ====
===Music===
{{See also|Byzantine literature}}
{{Main|Byzantine music}}
In [[Byzantine literature]], three different cultural elements are recognised: the [[Greek literature|Greek]], the Christian, and the [[Ancient Near East|Oriental]]. Byzantine literature is often classified in five groups: historians and annalists; encyclopaedists ([[Photios I of Constantinople|Patriarch Photios]], [[Michael Psellos|Michael Psellus]], and [[Michael Choniates]] are regarded as the greatest encyclopaedists of Byzantium) and essayists; writers of secular poetry (the only genuine heroic epic of the Byzantines is the ''[[Digenes Akritas|Digenis Acritas]]);'' ecclesiastical and theological literature; and popular poetry.<ref name="Mango275–276">{{Harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=275–276}}.</ref> Of the 2,000 to 3,000 volumes of Byzantine literature that survive, only 330 consist of secular poetry, history, science and pseudo-science.<ref name="Mango275–276" /> While the most flourishing period of the secular literature of Byzantium runs from the 9th to the 12th century, its religious literature ([[sermon]]s, [[liturgical book]]s and poetry, theology, devotional treatises, etc.) developed much earlier with [[Romanos the Melodist]] being its most prominent representative.<ref name="CLi">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Byzantine Literature |encyclopedia=Catholic Encyclopedia |url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03113a.htm |access-date=6 June 2007 |archive-date=19 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110219014014/http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03113a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>


==== Music ====
{{CSS image crop
{{See also|Byzantine music|List of Byzantine composers}}
|Image      = Mosaic of the Female Musicians.jpg
{{Annotated image
|bSize      = 350
| image = Mosaic of the Female Musicians.jpg
|cWidth      = 260
| image-width = 800
|cHeight    = 190
| image-left = -210
|oTop        = 25
| image-top = -100
|oLeft      = 45
| width = 200
|Location    = right
| height = 200
|alt        = A cropped image of a mosaic, which depicts two women playing a church organ like instrument
| float = right
|Description = Late 4th-century "Mosaic of the Musicians" playing the [[pipe organ|organ]], [[aulos]], and [[lyre]] from a Byzantine villa in [[Maryamin, Hama|Maryamin]], Syria{{sfn|Ring|1994|p=318}}
| annotations =
| caption = Late 4th century "Mosaic of the Musicians" with [[pipe organ|organ]], [[aulos]], and [[lyre]] from a Byzantine villa in [[Maryamin, Hama|Maryamin]], [[Syria]]<ref name="Ring">{{Cite book |last=Ring |first=Trudy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R44VRnNCzAYC |title=International Dictionary of Historic Places: Middle East and Africa |publisher=Taylor & Francis |date=1994 |isbn=978-1-884964-03-9 |volume=4 |page=318 |access-date=23 October 2016 |archive-date=9 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190609091417/https://books.google.com/books?id=R44VRnNCzAYC |url-status=live }}</ref>
| icon = none
}}
}}


The ecclesiastical forms of [[Byzantine music]]—composed to Greek texts as ceremonial, festival, or church music<ref>The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. 2007 – "Byzantine music"</ref>—are today the most well-known forms. Ecclesiastical chants were a fundamental part of this genre. Greek and foreign historians agree that the ecclesiastical tones and in general the whole system of Byzantine music is closely related to the [[Music of ancient Greece|ancient Greek system]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.ec-patr.net/en/psaltai/index.htm |last=Ecumenical Patriarchate |title=Byzantine Music |access-date=23 November 2014 |archive-date=16 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160416204900/http://www.ec-patr.net/en/psaltai/index.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> It remains the oldest genre of extant music, of which the manner of performance and (with increasing accuracy from the 5th century onwards) the names of the composers, and sometimes the particulars of each musical work's circumstances, are known.
[[Byzantine music]] is eclectically descended from early [[Plainsong|Christian plainsong]], [[Jewish music]], and a variety of [[ancient music]]; its exact connections to [[Musical system of ancient Greece|ancient Greek music]] remain uncertain.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|1pp=28–29|2a1=Conomos|2y=1991|2p=1426}} It included both [[Sacred music|sacred]] and [[Secular music|secular]] traditions, but the latter is little known, whereas the former remains the central music of [[Eastern Orthodox]] liturgy into the 21st century.{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1y=1991|1pp=1424–1426|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§ Introduction}} The empire's church music, known as Byzantine [[chant]], was exclusively unaccompanied [[Monody|monodic]] vocal music, sung in Greek.{{sfn|Velimirović|1990|pp=26–27, 29}} From the 8th century, chant melodies were governed by the ''[[Oktōēchos]]'' framework, a set of eight [[Mode (music)|modes]]—[[echos]] ({{lang|grc|ἦχος}}; {{lit.|sound}})—each of these provide predetermined [[Motif (music)|motivic]] formulae for composition.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|1pp=45–46|2a1=Conomos|2y=1991|2p=1425|3a1=Levy|3a2=Troelsgård|3y=2016|3loc=§5 "System of eight modes ('oktōēchos')", §7 "Formulaic chants"}} These formulae were chosen for proper [[text stress]] and occasionally for [[text painting]], then collated through [[centonisation]] into [[hymn]]s or [[psalm]]s.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|1p=29|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§7 "Formulaic chants"}}


[[File:Byzantine Lyra Museo Nazionale.jpg|thumb|upright|200px|Earliest known depiction of a [[Byzantine lyra|bowed lyra]], from a Byzantine ivory casket (900–1100) (''Museo Nazionale, Florence'')]]
Byzantine chant was central to the [[Byzantine Rite]]; the earliest music was not [[musical notation|notated]],{{sfn|Velimirović|1990|pp=26–27}} including early mono[[strophic]] short hymns like the [[troparion]].{{sfn|Levy|Troelsgård|2016|loc=§10 "Syllabic hymn settings"}} Proto-[[Ekphonetic notation]] (9th century onwards) marked simple [[recitation]] patterns. The [[neumatic]] Palaeo-Byzantine notation system emerged in the 10th century, and the Middle Byzantine "Round Notation" from the mid-12th century onwards is the first fully [[:wikt:diastematic|diastematic]] scheme.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|1pp=48–51|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§3 "Melodic notation"}} Several major forms developed alongside [[List of Byzantine composers|well-known composers]]: the long [[kontakion]] (5th century onwards), popularised by [[Romanos the Melodist]]; the also-extensive [[Canon (hymnography)|kanōn]] (late 7th century onwards), developed by [[Andrew of Crete]]; and the shorter [[sticheron]] (at least 8th century onwards), championed by [[Kassia]].{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1y=1991|1p=1425|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§3 "Melodic notation"|3a1=Mellas|3y=2020|3p=2}} By the Palaiologan period, the dominance of strict compositional rules lessened and [[John Koukouzeles]] led a new school favouring a more [[Ornament (music)|ornamental]] "kalophonic" style which deeply informed post-empire Neo-Byzantine music.{{sfn|Conomos|1991|pp=1425–1426}}


The 9th-century Persian geographer [[Ibn Khordadbeh]], in his lexicographical discussion of instruments, cited the [[Byzantine lyra|lyra]] (lūrā) as the typical instrument of the Byzantines along with the ''urghun'' (organ), ''shilyani'' (probably a type of [[harp]] or [[lyre]]) and the ''salandj'' (probably a [[Bagpipes|bagpipe]]).<ref name="Kartomi124">{{Harvnb|Kartomi|1990|p=124}}.</ref> The first of these, the early bowed stringed instrument known as the Byzantine lyra, came to be called the ''[[lira da braccio]]'',<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia |date=2009 |title=lira |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/343204/lira |access-date=2 June 2022 |archive-date=1 August 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090801000612/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/343204/lira |url-status=live }}</ref> in Venice, where it is considered by many to have been the predecessor of the contemporary violin, which later flourished there.<ref name="Arkenberg109">{{Cite web |last=Arkenberg |first=Rebecca |date=October 2002 |title=Renaissance Violins |url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/renv/hd_renv.htm |access-date=22 September 2006 |publisher=[[Metropolitan Museum of Art]] |archive-date=7 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307212424/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/renv/hd_renv.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> The bowed "lyra" is still played in former Byzantine regions, where it is known as the [[Classical kemençe|Politiki lyra]] ({{Literal translation|lyra of the City}}, i.e. Constantinople) in Greece, the [[Calabrian lira]] in southern Italy, and the [[lijerica]] in Dalmatia. The [[water organ]] originated in the Hellenistic world and was used in the [[Hippodrome]] during races.<ref>Journal of Sport History, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Winter, 1981) [http://rbedrosian.com/Byz/Byz_Sports.pdf p. 44] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170622090211/http://rbedrosian.com/Byz/Byz_Sports.pdf |date=22 June 2017 }}.</ref><ref name="Bush-Kassel-327">Douglas Earl Bush, Richard Kassel editors, ''The Organ: An Encyclopedia'' Routledge. 2006. {{ISBN|978-0-415-94174-7}}. [https://books.google.com/books?id=cgDJaeFFUPoC&pg=PA327 p. 327] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530120840/https://books.google.com/books?id=cgDJaeFFUPoC&pg=PA327 |date=30 May 2016 }}</ref> A [[pipe organ]] with "great leaden pipes" was sent by Emperor Constantine V to [[Pepin the Short]], [[List of Frankish kings#Kings of the Franks|King of the Franks]] in 757. Pepin's son [[Charlemagne]] requested a similar organ for his chapel in [[Aachen]] in 812, beginning its establishment in Western church music.<ref name=Bush-Kassel-327/> The [[aulos]] was a double-reeded woodwind like the modern [[oboe]] or Armenian [[duduk]]. Other forms include the ''plagiaulos'' (''πλαγίαυλος'', from ''πλάγιος'' "sideways"), which resembled the [[flute]],<ref name="Howard">{{Cite journal |last=Howard |first=Albert A. |date=1893 |title=The Αὐλός or Tibia |journal=Harvard Studies in Classical Philology |volume=4 |pages=1–60 |doi=10.2307/310399 |jstor=310399}}<!--| access-date = 16 August 2006 --></ref> and the ''askaulos'' (ἀσκός ''askos'' – [[wineskin]]), a bagpipe.<ref name="google15">{{Cite book |last=Flood |first=William Henry Grattan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DOfuAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA15 |title=The story of the bagpipe |publisher=Рипол Классик |isbn=978-1-176-34422-8 |access-date=23 October 2016 |archive-date=26 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170226140149/https://books.google.com/books?id=DOfuAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA15 |url-status=live }}</ref> Bagpipes, also known as ''[[dankiyo]]'' (from ancient Greek: angion (Τὸ ἀγγεῖον) "the container"), had been played even in Roman times and continued to be played throughout the empire's former realms through to the present. (See Balkan [[Gaida]], Greek [[Tsampouna]], [[Pontic Greek|Pontic]] [[Tulum (bagpipe)|Tulum]], Cretan [[Askomandoura]], Armenian [[Parkapzuk]], and Romanian [[Cimpoi]].) The modern descendant of the aulos is the Greek [[Zurna|Zourna]]. Other instruments used in Byzantine music were the [[Qanun (instrument)|Kanonaki]], [[Oud]], [[Laouto]], [[Santouri]], [[Tambouras]], Seistron (defi tambourine), [[Toubeleki]], and Daouli. Some claim that the [[Lavta]] may have been invented by the Byzantines before the arrival of the Turks.{{Citation needed|date=May 2021}}
Secular music, often state-sponsored, was ubiquitous in daily life and featured in a variety of ceremonies, festivals, and theatre.{{sfn|Touliatos|2001|loc=§ Introduction}} Secular vocal music was rarely notated, and extant manuscripts date much later, suggesting the tradition was passed through [[oral tradition]] and likely [[improvised]].{{sfn|Touliatos|2001|loc=§ "Sources"}} Prohibited for liturgical use, a wide variety of Byzantine [[Musical instrument|instrument]]s flourished in secular contexts, although no notated instrumental music survives.{{sfn|Conomos|Kazhdan|1991|p=1426}} It is uncertain to what extent instrumentalists improvised or if they doubled vocalists monophonically or [[Heterophony|heterophonically]].{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1a2=Kazhdan|1y=1991|1p=1426|2a1=Touliatos|2y=2001|2loc=§2 "Instruments and performing practice"}} Among the best known instruments are the [[hydraulic organ]], used for circus and imperial court events; the [[Music of ancient Greece|ancient Greek]]-descended [[aulos]], a [[wind instrument]]; the [[tambouras]], a plucked [[string instrument]]; and mostly popularly, the [[Byzantine lyra]].{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1a2=Kazhdan|1y=1991|1p=1426|2a1=Touliatos|2y=2001|2loc=§2 "Instruments and performing practice"}} Prominent genres included [[acclamatio]]n chants of laudation or salutation; the celebratory [[Acritic songs]]; symposia instrumental [[banquet]]s, based on ancient [[symposium]]s; and [[dance music]].{{sfn|Touliatos|2001|loc=§3 "Genres and composers"}}


=== Cuisine ===
=== Science and technology ===
{{Main|Byzantine cuisine}}
{{Main|Byzantine science}}


Byzantine culture was initially the same as Late Greco-Roman, but over the following millennium of the empire's existence it slowly changed into something more similar to modern Balkan and Anatolian culture. The cuisine still relied heavily on the Greco-Roman fish-sauce condiment [[garum|garos]], but it also contained foods still familiar today, such as the cured meat [[pastirma]] (known as "paston" in Byzantine Greek),<ref>{{Harvnb|Ash|1995|p=224: "Having inherited pastirma from the Byzantines, the Turks took it with them when they conquered Hungary and Romania."}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Davidson|2014|loc="Byzantine cookery", pp. 123–24: "This is certainly true of Byzantine cuisine. Dried meat, a forerunner of the ''pastirma'' of modern Turkey, became a delicacy."}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Dalby|Bourbou|Koder|Leontsinē|2013|p=81: "''paston'' or ''tarichon''...Cured meats were either eaten raw or cooked in ''pasto-mageireia'' with bulgur and greens, mainly cabbage."}}</ref> [[baklava]] (known as [[Placenta cake|koptoplakous]] κοπτοπλακοῦς),<ref>{{Harvnb|Ash|1995|p=223}}; {{Harvnb|Faas|2005|p=184}}; {{Harvnb|Vryonis|1971|p=482}}.</ref> [[tiropita]] (known as plakountas tetyromenous or tyritas plakountas),<ref>{{Harvnb|Faas|2005|pp=184–185}}; {{Harvnb|Vryonis|1971|p=482}}; {{Harvnb|Salaman|1986|p=184}}.</ref> and the famed medieval sweet wines ([[Malvasia]] from [[Monemvasia]], [[Commandaria]] and the eponymous [[Rumney wine]]). [[Retsina]], wine flavoured with pine resin, was also drunk, as it still is in Greece today, producing similar reactions from unfamiliar visitors; "To add to our calamity the Greek wine, on account of being mixed with pitch, resin, and plaster was to us undrinkable," complained [[Liutprand of Cremona]], who was the ambassador sent to Constantinople in 968 by the German Holy Roman Emperor [[Otto I]].<ref name="Fordham">{{Cite web |last=Halsall |first=Paul |date=January 1996 |title=Medieval Sourcebook: Liutprand of Cremona: Report of his Mission to Constantinople |url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/liudprand1.asp |access-date=25 June 2016 |website=Internet History Sourcebooks Project |publisher=Fordham University |archive-date=17 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141017151834/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/liudprand1.asp |url-status=live }}</ref> The garos fish sauce condiment was also not much appreciated by the unaccustomed; Liutprand of Cremona described being served food covered in an "exceedingly bad fish liquor."<ref name="Fordham" /> The Byzantines also used a soy sauce-like condiment, [[murri (condiment)|murri]], a fermented barley sauce, which, like soy sauce, provided [[umami]] flavouring to their dishes.<ref>{{Harvnb|Jayyusi|Marín|1994|p=729}}.</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Perry |first=Charles |date=31 October 2001 |title=The Soy Sauce That Wasn't |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2001/oct/31/food/fo-63688 |access-date=25 June 2016 |website=Los Angeles Times |archive-date=27 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160527001857/http://articles.latimes.com/2001/oct/31/food/fo-63688 |url-status=live }}</ref>
{{See also|List of Byzantine inventions|Byzantine philosophy|List of Byzantine scholars}}
[[File:20131203 Istanbul 048.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.15|Interior of the [[Hagia Sophia]]; the influence of [[Archimedes]]' principles of solid geometry is evident.|alt=A photograph of the interior of a building built with blue arches and pillars and ornate yellow walls]]


=== Flags and insignia ===
The scholars of the empire played a principal role in transmitting classical knowledge to the [[Greek contributions to the Islamic world|Islamic world]] and [[Italian Renaissance|Renaissance Italy]], as well as producing commentaries that helped expand scientific knowledge.{{sfnm|Robins|1993|1pp=8-9|Lazaris|2020a|2p=17|Telelis|2020|3p=186}} This medieval Greek scholarship was not only based on scientific treatises from antiquity but also drew from Islamic, Latin, and Hebrew works, which helped spearhead new developments as late as the 11th and 12th centuries.{{sfnm|1a1=Lazaris|1y=2020a|1pp=3, 11|2a1=Inglebert|2y=2020|2p=27|3a1=Tatakes|3a2=Moutafakis|3y=2003|3p=180}} Although the Empire is sometimes not associated with scientific innovation or major discoveries,{{sfnm|Mango|2008|1p=958|2a1=Nicolaidis et al.|2y=2016|2pp=544–545}} its scientific contributions have also been described as underestimated.{{sfn|Tihon|2013|p=206}} Incomplete assessments of Byzantine texts{{sfn|Tihon|2013|p=206}} and the challenges of applying modern definitions of science to pre-modern contexts are factors in these ongoing debates.{{sfn|Lazaris|2020a|pp=1–5}}
{{Main|Byzantine flags and insignia}}
[[File:Byzantine Palaiologos Eagle.svg|thumb|200px|[[Double-headed eagle|The double-headed eagle]], a common Imperial symbol]]


For most of its history, the Byzantine Empire did not know or use [[heraldry]] in the West European sense. Various emblems ({{Lang-el|σημεία}}, ''sēmeia''; sing. σημείον, ''sēmeion'') were used in official occasions and for military purposes, such as banners or shields displaying various motifs such as the [[cross]] or the ''[[labarum]]''. The use of the cross and images of [[Jesus|Christ]], the [[Mary, mother of Jesus|Virgin Mary]] and various saints is also [[sigillography|attested on seals]] of officials, but these were personal rather than family emblems.{{Sfn|Kazhdan|1991|pp=472, 999}}
[[File:Liquid fire granades Chania.jpg|thumb|upright|Ceramic grenades which were filled with [[Greek fire]], surrounded by [[caltrop]]s, 10th–12th century, [[National Historical Museum (Greece)|National Historical Museum]], Athens|alt=Two pots surrounded by caltrops]]


=== Language ===
Key people passed on important traditions that underpinned this scholarship, especially in the realms of philosophy, geometry, astronomy, and grammar.{{Sfn|Manolova|2020|p=66}} For example, the Hagia Sophia architect [[Isidore of Miletus]] ({{Circa|530}}), compiled [[Archimedes]]' works which [[Leo the Mathematician]] ({{Circa|850|lk=no}}) incorporated into formal courses, and is why the [[Archimedes Palimpsest]] is known today.{{Sfnm|Manolova|2020|1p=66|Jones|2005|2p=520-521}} [[John Philoponus]] and his critiques of [[Aristotelian physics]], the pharmacologist [[Pedanius Dioscorides]], and Ptolematic geography and astronomy had an important influence on western science, as seen with [[Ptolemy]]'s influence on [[Nicolaus Copernicus|Copernicus]] and Philoponus on [[Bonaventure]], [[Gersonides]], [[Jean Buridan|Buridan]], [[Nicole Oresme|Oresme]] and [[Galileo Galilei|Galileo]].{{sfnm|Wildberg|2018|1p=|Lindberg|1992|2p=162}}
{{Further|Medieval Greek}}
{{Multiple image
| align = right
| image1 = Mudil_Psalter.jpg
| width1 = 140
| alt1 =
| caption1 =
| image2 = Joshua_Roll.jpg
| width2 = 146
| alt2 =
| caption2 =
| footer = Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete [[psalter]] in the Coptic language ([[Coptic Museum]], Egypt, [[Coptic Cairo]])<br />
Right: The [[Joshua Roll]], a 10th-century illuminated Greek manuscript possibly made in Constantinople ([[Vatican Library]], Rome)
}}
[[File:Asia Minor dialects.png|thumb|Distribution of Greek dialects in [[Anatolia]] in the late Byzantine Empire through to 1923. [[Modern Greek#Demotic|Demotic]] in yellow. [[Pontic Greek|Pontic]] in orange. [[Cappadocian Greek|Cappadocian]] in green. (Green dots indicate Cappadocian Greek-speaking villages in 1910.<ref>[http://ia800306.us.archive.org/13/items/moderngreekinas00hallgoog/moderngreekinas00hallgoog.pdf Modern Greek in Asia Minor. A study of the dialects of Sílli, Cappadocia and Phárasa.] [[Richard MacGillivray Dawkins|Dawkins, R.M.]] 1916. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</ref>)]]


Apart from the Imperial court, administration and military, the primary language used in the eastern Roman provinces even before the decline of the Western Empire was Greek, having been spoken in the region for centuries before Latin.<ref>{{Harvnb|Millar|2006|p=279}}.</ref> Following Rome's conquest of the east its 'Pax Romana', inclusionist political practices and development of public infrastructure, facilitated the further spreading and entrenchment of the Greek language in the east. Indeed, early on in the life of the Roman Empire, Greek had become the common language of the Church, the language of scholarship and the arts, and to a large degree the ''[[lingua franca]]'' for trade between provinces and with other nations.<ref>{{Harvnb|Bryce|1901|p=59}}; {{Harvnb|McDonnell|2006|p=77}}; {{Harvnb|Millar|2006|pp=97–98}}; {{Harvnb|Oikonomides|1999|pp=12–13}}.</ref> Greek for a time became [[Diglossia|diglossic]] with the spoken language, known as [[Koine Greek|Koine]] (eventually evolving into [[Demotic Greek]]), used alongside an older written form ([[Attic Greek]]) until [[Koine Greek|Koine]] won out as the spoken and written standard.<ref>{{Harvnb|Oikonomides|1999|pp=12–13}}.</ref>
Military innovations included the [[Stirrup|riding stirrup]] which provided stability for mounted archers and dramatically transformed the army; a specialised type of [[horseshoe]]; the [[Lateen|lateen sail]], which improved a ship's responsiveness to wind; and [[Greek fire]]—an incendiary weapon capable of burning even when doused with water, first appearing around the time of the [[Siege of Constantinople (674–678)]].{{sfnm|Lazaris|2020a|1p=16|Salmon|2020|2pp=445-446|Partington|1999|3p=13}} In [[Byzantine medicine|healthcare]], the empire pioneered the concept of the hospital as an institution offering medical care and the possibility of a cure for the patients, rather than merely being a place to die.{{sfnm|Lindberg|1992|1p=349|Nutton|1984|2p=9|Miller|1997|3pp=ix, 3–4|Bennett|2016|4pp=7-14}}


The Emperor [[Diocletian]] sought to renew the authority of Latin, making it the official language of the Roman administration also in the East, and the Greek expression ἡ κρατοῦσα διάλεκτος ''(hē kratousa dialektos)'' attests to the status of Latin as "the language of power."<ref>Rochette, "Language Policies in the Roman Republic and Empire," p. 560.</ref> In the early 5th century, Greek gained equal status with Latin as the official language in the East, and emperors gradually began to legislate in Greek rather than Latin starting with the reign of Leo I the Thracian in the 460s.<ref name="theinheritance">The Inheritance of Rome, Chris Wickham, Penguin Books Ltd. 2009, {{ISBN|978-0-670-02098-0}}. p. 90.</ref> The last Eastern emperor to stress the importance of Latin was Justinian I, whose ''Corpus Juris Civilis'' was written almost entirely in Latin. He may also have been the last native Latin-speaking emperor.<ref name= theinheritance/>
== Legacy ==
{{Main|Legacy of the Roman Empire}}


The use of Latin as the language of administration persisted for centuries, though it was increasingly replaced by Greek. Scholarly Latin rapidly fell into disuse among the educated classes although the language continued to be at least a ceremonial part of the empire's culture for some time.<ref name="ApWr">{{Harvnb|Apostolides|1992|pp=25–26}}; {{Harvnb|Wroth|1908|loc=Introduction, Section 6}}</ref> Additionally, Latin remained a minority language in the empire, mainly on the Italian peninsula, along the Dalmatian coast and in the Balkans (specially in mountainous areas away from the coast), eventually developing into various [[Romance languages]] like [[Dalmatian language|Dalmatian]] or [[Romanian language|Romanian]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Sedlar|1994|pp=403–440}}.</ref>
=== Political aftermath ===
 
{{See also|Succession to the Byzantine Empire}}
Many other languages existed in the empire, and some of these were given limited official status in their provinces at various times.<ref name="Harris2014">{{Harvnb|Harris|2014|p= [https://books.google.com/books?id=s6tOBAAAQBAJ&q=While%20Greek%20was%20its%20official%20language%2C%20Armenian%20and%20Slavonic%20languages%20were%20also%20widely%20spoken%2C%20especially%20in%20the%20frontier%20districts.%20There%20were%20also%20pockets%20of&pg=PA12 12]}}</ref> Notably, by the beginning of the Middle Ages, [[Syriac language|Syriac]] had become more widely used by the educated classes in the far eastern provinces.<ref name="BJVe">{{Harvnb|Beaton|1996|p=10}}; {{Harvnb|Jones|1986|p=991}}; {{Harvnb|Versteegh|1977|loc=Chapter 1}}.</ref> Similarly, [[Armenian language|Armenian]], and [[Georgian language|Georgian]] became significant among the educated in their provinces.<ref>{{Harvnb|Campbell|2000|p=40}}; {{Harvnb|Hacikyan|Basmajian|Franchuk|Ouzounian|2002|loc=Part 1}}</ref> Later foreign contacts made [[Old Church Slavonic]], [[Middle Persian|Persian]], and [[Classical Arabic|Arabic]] important in parts of the empire.<ref>{{Harvnb|Baynes|1907|p=289}}; {{Harvnb|Gutas|1998|loc=Chapter 7, Section 4}}; {{Harvnb|Comrie|1987|p=129}}.</ref> There was a revival of Latin studies in the 10th century due to increased contacts with Western Europe, and by the 11th century knowledge of Latin was no longer unusual at Constantinople.<ref>''Byzantine Civilisation'', Steven Runciman, Hodder & Stoughton Educational (1933) {{ISBN|978-0-7131-5316-3}}, p. 232</ref> There was widespread use of the Armenian and various Slavic languages, which became more pronounced in the border regions of the empire.<ref name="Harris2014" />
 
Various other languages were spoken in the empire by foreign merchants, mercenaries, pilgrims, dignitaries, and others.<ref>{{Harvnb|Beckwith|1993|p=171}}; {{Harvnb|Halsall|1998}}; {{Harvnb|Oikonomides|1999|p=20}}.</ref> As the empire entered its final decline, the non-Greek speaking regions were lost, and the presence of foreigners diminished, making the empire increasingly homogeneously Greek speaking.<ref>{{Harvnb|Kaldellis|2007|loc=Chapter 6}}; {{Harvnb|Nicol|1993|loc=Chapter 5}}.</ref>
 
=== Recreation ===
[[File:Tabula - boardgame - Zeno game.svg|thumb|A game of [[tabula (game)|τάβλι (tabula)]] played by [[Byzantine]] emperor [[Zeno (emperor)|Zeno]] in 480 and recorded by [[Agathias]] in {{Circa|530}} because of a very unlucky dice throw for Zeno (red), as he threw 2, 5 and 6 and was forced to leave eight pieces alone.<ref name="Austin">{{Harvnb|Austin|1934|pp=202–205}}.</ref>]]


Byzantines were avid players of [[tabula (game)|tavli]] ([[Byzantine Greek]]: τάβλη), a game known in English as [[backgammon]], which is still popular in former Byzantine realms and still known by the name tavli in Greece.<ref name=Austin/> Byzantine nobles were devoted to horsemanship, particularly [[Tzykanisterion|tzykanion]], now known as [[polo]]. The game came from Sassanid Persia, and a Tzykanisterion (stadium for playing the game) was built by Theodosius II inside the [[Great Palace of Constantinople]]. Emperor Basil I excelled at it; Emperor Alexander died from exhaustion while playing, Emperor Alexios I Komnenos was injured while playing with [[Tatikios]], and John I of Trebizond died from a fatal injury during a game.<ref>{{Harvnb|Kazhdan|1991}}.</ref><ref>[[Anna Komnene]],''The Alexiad'', [[s:The Alexiad/Book XIV#Chapter IV|Book XIV, Chapter IV]], translator Elizabeth Dawes</ref> Aside from Constantinople and Trebizond, other Byzantine cities also featured ''tzykanisteria'', most notably [[Sparta]], [[Ephesus]], and [[Athens]], an indication of a thriving urban aristocracy.<ref>{{Harvnb|Kazanaki-Lappa|2002|p=643}}.</ref> The game was introduced to the West by crusaders, who developed a taste for it particularly during the pro-Western reign of Emperor Manuel I Komnenos. Chariot races were popular and held at hippodromes across the empire. There were initially four major factions in chariot racing, differentiated by the colour of the uniform in which they competed; the colours were also [[Byzantine dress|worn]] by their supporters. These were the Blues (''Veneti''), the Greens (''Prasini''), the Reds (''Russati''), and the Whites (''Albati''), although by the Byzantine era the only teams with any influence were the Blues and Greens. Emperor Justinian I was a supporter of the Blues.
[[File:Eastern Mediterranean 1450.svg|thumb|The Eastern Mediterranean just before the [[Fall of Constantinople]]|alt=A map centred on Greece and Turkey in 1450 AD. The Byzantine Empire holds only Southern Greece and northwestern Turkey]]


=== Women ===
After Constantinople fell, the Ottomans quickly absorbed the remaining independent territories, including [[Acciaioli family|Acciaiuoli]] Athens in 1458, Morea in 1460, Trebizond in 1461, and [[Gattilusio|Gattilusi]] [[Lesbos]] in 1462.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=914|Nicol|1993|2pp=407-408|Bryer|2009|3p=856}} They dismantled the Empire's political and secular institutions, leaving the impoverished Church to manage what would be later called the ''[[Rum Millet]]'', primarily as a tool for taxing its followers.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=914–915|Bryer|2009|2p=869 |Papademetriou|2015|3p=52}} As the sole sovereign Orthodox state, Russia developed the [[Moscow, third Rome|Third Rome doctrine]], emphasising its cultural heritage as distinct from Western Europe, because the latter had inherited much of the empire's secular learning.{{sfnm|Seton-Watson|1967|1p=31|Kaldellis|2023|2p=901|Mango|2008|3pp=960-961}} The [[Danubian Principalities]] became a haven for Orthodox Christians and [[Phanariots|Phanariot]] Greeks who sought to recreate a Byzantine Greek Empire.{{sfn|Clark|2000|p=215}} In modern Greece, members of the ''Rum Millet'' [[Names of the Greeks#Romans (Ῥωμαῖοι)|increasingly identified as Greeks]], eventually leading to a [[Greek War of Independence|successful war of independence]] in the 19th century.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=915|Treadgold|1997b|2p=1125}} The modern Greek state nearly doubled its territory through the pursuit of the [[Megali Idea]]—a vision of reclaiming the former lands of the eastern empire—achieving limited success during the [[Crimean War]] but making significant gains during the [[Balkan Wars]].{{sfnm|1a1=Ivanova|1a2=Anderson|1y=2024|1p=1240|2a1=Kaldellis|2y=2022b|2p=360}}
[[File:Theodora mosaik ravenna.jpg|thumb|400px|Empress [[Theodora (6th century)|Theodora]] with her retinue. Mosaic of the [[Basilica of San Vitale]] in [[Ravenna]], VI century]]


{{main|Women in the Byzantine Empire}}
Since the 15th century, Byzantine history has been deeply politicised, woven into nationalist, colonialist, and imperialist narratives.{{sfnm|1a1=Ivanova|1a2=Anderson|1y=2024|1pp=1233, 1235, 1248|2a1=Aschenbrenner|2a2=Ransohoff|2y=2022b|2p=372|3a1=Kaldellis|3y=2022b|3p=352}} This politicisation appears not only in Greece but also in Bulgarian, Romanian, Serbian, Hungarian, and Turkish nationalism, as well as in former French and Russian imperialist agendas.{{sfnm|1a1=Ivanova|1a2=Anderson|1y=2024|1pp=1229-41, 1234, 1238|2a1=Haarer|2y=2010|2pp=18–19}} In the English-speaking world, interpretations of Byzantine history frequently surface in political debates, alongside the growing appreciation for its legacy.{{sfnm|1a1=Ivanova|1a2=Anderson|1y=2024|1p=1248|2a1=Haarer|2y=2010|2pp=10-12|3a1=Goldwyn|3y=2022|3p=325|4a2=Mango|4y=2008|4p=958}} The complexity of this history makes it a sensitive topic, especially regarding Greece's role in Europe's evolving sense of identity and the origin stories of many European nations.{{sfnm|1a1=Ivanova|1a2=Anderson|1y=2024|1p=1248|2a1=Haarer|2y=2010|2p=18-19|3a1=Stewart|3y=2022|3p=3|4a1=Kaldellis|4y=2023|4pp=2-3|5a1=Cameron|5y=2010|5pp=177-178}}
The position of [[women in the Byzantine Empire]] essentially represents the position of women in ancient Rome transformed by the introduction of Christianity, with certain rights and customs being lost and replaced, while others were allowed to remain. There were individual Byzantine women famed for their educational accomplishments. However, the general view of women's education was that it was sufficient for a girl to learn domestic duties and to study the lives of the Christian saints and memorize psalms,<ref name="Guglielmo Cavallo">Guglielmo Cavallo: ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=FJDRx6FAi0EC&q=byzantine%20women%20divorce&pg=PA119 The Byzantines] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605121757/https://books.google.se/books?id=FJDRx6FAi0EC&pg=PA119&q=byzantine%20women%20divorce |date=5 June 2022 }}''</ref> and to learn to read so that she could study Bible scriptures—although literacy in women was sometimes discouraged because it was believed it could encourage vice.<ref name="Paul Stephenson">Paul Stephenson: ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=M-SrAgAAQBAJ The Byzantine World] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605030232/https://books.google.se/books?id=M-SrAgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover |date=5 June 2022 }}''</ref>


The Roman right to divorce was gradually erased after the introduction of Christianity and replaced with legal separation and annulment. Marriage was regarded as the ideal state for a woman, and only convent life was seen as a legitimate alternative. Within marriage, sexual activity was regarded only as a means of reproduction. Women had the right to appear before court, but her testimony was not regarded as equal to that of a man and could be contradicted based on her sex if put against that of a man.<ref name="Guglielmo Cavallo" />
=== Cultural aftermath ===
 
From the 6th century there was a growing ideal of [[Sex segregation|gender segregation]], which dictated that women should wear veils<ref name="Marcus Louis Rautman">Marcus Louis Rautman:''[https://books.google.com/books?id=hs3iEyVRHKsC&pg=PA26 Daily Life in the Byzantine Empire] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605030234/https://books.google.se/books?id=hs3iEyVRHKsC&pg=PA26& |date=5 June 2022 }}''</ref> and only be seen in public when attending church,<ref name="Lynda Garland">Lynda Garland:''[https://books.google.com/books?id=5ro6DwAAQBAJ&q=byzantine%20women&pg=PT15 Byzantine Women: Varieties of Experience 800–1200] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605030233/https://books.google.se/books?id=5ro6DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT15&q=byzantine%20women |date=5 June 2022 }}''</ref> and while the ideal was never fully enforced, it influenced society. The laws of Emperor Justinian I made it legal for a man to divorce his wife for attending public premises such as theatres or public baths without his permission,<ref name="Jonathan Harris">Jonathan Harris: ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=tuACDgAAQBAJ&q=byzantine%20women%20profession&pg=PA133 Constantinople: Capital of Byzantium] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605030232/https://books.google.se/books?id=tuACDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA133&q=byzantine%20women%20profession |date=5 June 2022 }}''</ref> and Emperor Leo VI banned women from witnessing business contracts with the argument that it caused them to come in contact with men.<ref name="Guglielmo Cavallo" /> In Constantinople, upper-class women were increasingly expected to keep to a special women's section (''gynaikonitis''),<ref name="Lynda Garland" /> and by the 8th century it was described as unacceptable for unmarried daughters to meet unrelated men.<ref name="Guglielmo Cavallo" /> While imperial women and their ladies appeared in public alongside men, women and men at the imperial court attended royal banquets separately until the rise of the Komnenos dynasty in the 12th century.<ref name="Lynda Garland" />
 
Eastern Roman and later Byzantine women retained the Roman woman's right to inherit, own and manage their property and signs contracts,<ref name="Lynda Garland" /> rights which were far superior to the rights of married women in Medieval Catholic Western Europe, as these rights included both married women as well as unmarried women and widows.<ref name="Jonathan Harris" /> Women's legal right to handle their own money made it possible for rich women to engage in business, however women who actively had to find a profession to support themselves normally worked as domestics or in domestic fields such as the food or textile industry.<ref name="Jonathan Harris" /> Women could work as medical physicians and attendants of women patients and visitors at hospitals and public baths with government support.<ref name="Paul Stephenson" />
 
After the introduction of Christianity, women could no longer become priestesses, but it became common for women to found and manage nunneries, which functioned as schools for girls as well as asylums, poor houses, hospitals, prisons and retirement homes for women, and many Byzantine women practised social work as lay sisters and deaconesses.<ref name="Lynda Garland" />
 
== Economy ==
{{Further|Byzantine silk|Sino-Roman relations}}
[[File:Gold coin of Justinian I 527CE 565CE excavated in India probably in the south.jpg|thumb|upright|Golden Solidus of [[Justinian I]] (527–565) excavated in India probably in the south, an example of [[Indo-Roman trade]] during the period]]
 
The [[Byzantine economy]] was among the most advanced in Europe and the Mediterranean for many centuries. Europe, in particular, could not match Byzantine economic strength until late in the Middle Ages. Constantinople operated as a prime hub in a trading network that at various times extended across nearly all of [[Eurasia]] and [[North Africa]], in particular as the primary western terminus of the famous [[Silk Road]]. Until the first half of the 6th century and in sharp contrast with the decaying West, the Byzantine economy was flourishing and resilient.<ref>{{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=1, 23–38}}.</ref>
 
The [[Plague of Justinian]] and the Arab conquests represented a substantial reversal of fortunes contributing to a period of stagnation and decline. Isaurian reforms and Constantine V's repopulation, public works and tax measures marked the beginning of a revival that continued until 1204, despite territorial contraction.<ref>{{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=3, 45, 49–50, 231}}; {{Harvnb|Magdalino|2002b|p=532}}.</ref> From the 10th century until the end of the 12th, the Byzantine Empire projected an image of luxury and travellers were impressed by the wealth accumulated in the capital.<ref name="M532">{{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=90–91, 127, 166–169, 203–204}}; {{Harvnb|Magdalino|2002b|p=535}}.</ref>
 
The Fourth Crusade resulted in the disruption of Byzantine manufacturing and the commercial dominance of the Western Europeans in the [[eastern Mediterranean]], events that amounted to an economic catastrophe for the empire.<ref name="M532" /> The [[Palaiologos|Palaiologoi]] tried to revive the economy, but the late Byzantine state did not gain full control of either the foreign or domestic economic forces. Gradually, Constantinople also lost its influence on the modalities of trade and the price mechanisms, and its control over the outflow of precious metals and, according to some scholars, even over the minting of coins.<ref name="M806">{{Harvnb|Matschke|2002|pp=805–806}}.</ref>
 
One of the economic foundations of Byzantium was trade, fostered by the maritime character of the empire. Textiles must have been by far the most important item of export; [[silk]]s were certainly imported into Egypt and appeared also in Bulgaria, and the West.<ref name="L723">{{Harvnb|Laiou|2002b|p=723}}; {{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|p=13}}.</ref> The state strictly controlled both the internal and the international trade, and retained the monopoly of issuing [[Byzantine coinage|coinage]], maintaining a durable and flexible monetary system adaptable to trade needs.<ref name="L3-4">{{Harvnb|Laiou|2002a|pp=3–4}}; {{Harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|p=18}}.</ref>
 
The government attempted to exercise formal control over interest rates and set the parameters for the activity of the [[guild]]s and [[corporation]]s, in which it had a special interest. The emperor and his officials intervened at times of crisis to ensure the provisioning of the capital, and to keep down the price of cereals. Finally, the government often collected part of the surplus through taxation, and put it back into circulation, through redistribution in the form of salaries to state officials, or in the form of investment in public works.<ref name="L3-4" />
 
== Legacy ==
{{See also|Succession of the Roman Empire|Greek scholars in the Renaissance}}
{{See also|Succession of the Roman Empire|Greek scholars in the Renaissance}}
[[File:Christ Pantocrator mosaic from Hagia Sophia 2744 x 2900 pixels 3.1 MB.jpg|thumb|250px|Christ Pantocrator mosaic in [[Hagia Sophia]], circa 1261]]
[[File:Sousoší Cyrila a Metoděje 09.jpg|thumb|Monument to [[Saints Cyril and Methodius|St. Cyril and St. Methodius]], Byzantine missionaries to the Slavs, on [[Radhošť|Mt. Radhošť]] in Czechia|alt=A photograph of statue, which depicts two bearded and hooded men; the one on the left is holding up a cross and the one on the right is holding up a book]]
{{Byzantine culture}}


Byzantium has been often identified with absolutism, orthodox spirituality, orientalism and exoticism, while the terms "Byzantine" and "Byzantinism" have been used as bywords for decadence, complex bureaucracy, and repression. Both Eastern and Western European authors have often perceived Byzantium as a body of religious, political, and philosophical ideas contrary to those of the West. Even in [[History of modern Greece|19th-century Greece]], the focus was mainly on the classical past, while Byzantine tradition had been associated with negative connotations.<ref name="A1">{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=277–281}}.</ref>
The Byzantine Empire distinctively blended Roman political traditions, Greek literary heritage, and Christianity, creating the civilisational framework that laid the foundation for medieval Europe.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=3-4|Cameron|2010|2p=175}} The Empire preserved European civilisation by acting as a shield against forces from Eurasian Steppe people such as the Avars, Bulgars, Cumans, Huns, Pechenegs, and Turks.{{sfnm|Mango|2008|1pp=958-959|Obolensky|1994|2p=3}}


This traditional approach towards Byzantium has been partially or wholly disputed and revised by modern studies, which focus on the positive aspects of Byzantine culture and legacy. [[Averil Cameron]] regards as undeniable the Byzantine contribution to the formation of medieval Europe, and both Cameron and Obolensky recognise the major role of Byzantium in shaping Orthodoxy, which in turn occupies a central position in the history, societies and culture of Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia, Georgia, Serbia and other countries.<ref>{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=186–277}}.</ref> The Byzantines also preserved and copied classical manuscripts, and they are thus regarded as transmitters of classical knowledge, as important contributors to modern European civilisation, and as precursors of both [[Renaissance humanism]] and Slavic-Orthodox culture.<ref name="C311" /> Some scholars focused on the positive aspects of Byzantine culture and legacy, French historian [[Charles Diehl]] describes the Byzantine Empire by saying:
The empire's legal codes significantly influenced the civil law traditions of continental Europe, Russia, Latin America, Ethiopia, and even the English-speaking common law countries; and possibly influenced Islamic legal traditions as well.{{sfnm|Stolte|2015|2a1=Merryman|2a2=Pérez-Perdomo|2y=2007|Stein|1999|1pp=10–11|2pp=367–368|3p=36}}{{sfn|Salogubova|Zenkov|2018}} It also preserved and transmitted classical learning and manuscripts, making important contributions to the intellectual revival which fuelled [[Renaissance humanism|Italian humanism]].{{sfnm|Cameron|2010|1p=165|Mango|2008|2p=960}}
{{blockquote|Byzantium created a brilliant culture, may be, the most brilliant during the whole Middle Ages, doubtlessly the only one existing in Christian Europe before the XI century. For many years, Constantinople remained the sole grand city of Christian Europe ranking second to none in splendour. Byzantium literature and art exerted a significant impact on peoples around it. The monuments and majestic works of art, remaining after it, show us the whole lustre of byzantine culture. That's why Byzantium held a significant place in the history of Middle Ages and, one must admit it, a merited one.<ref>{{cite book|title=Les grands Problèmes de l'histoire byzantine|first=Charles |last=Diehl|year= 1947| isbn=978-0-299-80925-6| page =179|publisher=University of California Press|quote=}}</ref>}}


As the only stable long-term state in Europe during the Middle Ages, Byzantium isolated Western Europe from newly emerging forces to the East. Constantly under attack, it distanced Western Europe from Persians, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, and for a time, the Ottomans. From a different perspective, since the 7th century, the evolution and constant reshaping of the Byzantine state were directly related to the respective progress of Islam.<ref name="C311">{{Harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=261}}.</ref> Following the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks in 1453, Sultan Mehmed II took the title "''Kaysar-i Rûm''" (the Ottoman Turkish equivalent of [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]] of Rome), since he was determined to make the Ottoman Empire the heir of the Eastern Roman Empire.<ref>{{Harvnb|Béhar|1999|p=38}}; {{Harvnb|Bideleux|Jeffries|1998|p=71}}.</ref>
The Byzantine Empire played a pivotal role in shaping Christianity by supporting early Church fathers and the decisions of Church councils; developing the institution of [[Christian monasticism|monasticism]]; and fostering the [[Eastern Orthodoxy|Orthodox tradition]] which continues to define much of Eastern European identity.{{sfnm|Poppe|1991|1p=25|Cameron|2010|2p=261|Mango|2008|3p=358}} It was also instrumental in preserving the Greek language and is credited with developing the [[Glagolitic script|Glagolitic alphabet]], which later evolved into the [[Cyrillic script]] and [[Old Church Slavonic]].{{sfnm|Poppe|1991|1p=25|Ivanič|2016|2p=127|Mango|2008|3pp=959, 961}} These innovations provided the first literary language for the Slavs and formed the educational foundation for all Slavic nations.{{sfnm|Poppe|1991|1p=25|Ivanič|2016|2p=127|Cameron|2010|3p=165|Shepard|2006|4pp=7–8}}


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[List of Byzantine emperors]]
* [[Byzantine dress]]
* [[Family tree of Byzantine emperors]]
* [[Family tree of Byzantine emperors]]
* [[Index of Byzantine Empire–related articles]]
* [[Legacy of the Roman Empire]]
* [[List of Byzantine revolts and civil wars]]
* [[List of Byzantine revolts and civil wars]]
* [[List of Byzantine wars]]
* [[List of Byzantine wars]]
* [[List of Roman dynasties]]
* [[List of Roman dynasties]]
* [[Succession of the Roman Empire]]
* [[Outline of the Byzantine Empire]]
 
{{clear}}


== References ==
== References ==
=== Notes ===
=== Notes ===
{{NoteFoot}}
{{Notelist}}


=== Citations ===
=== Citations ===
{{Reflist|20em}}
{{Reflist}}


=== Sources ===
== Bibliography ==
====Primary sources====
{{Refbegin|40em}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/stream/earlyhistoryofsl00consrich |title=The Early History of the Slavonic Settlements in Dalmatia, Croatia, & Serbia – Constantine Porphyrogennetos, De Administrando Imperio, Chapters 29–36 |publisher=Macmillan |date=1920 |editor-last=Bury |editor-first=John Bagnеll |location=New York }} (in Greek)
* {{Cite book |last=Choniates |first=Nicetas |title=Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History by D.C. Munro (Series 1, Vol 3:1) |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |date=1912 |location=Philadelphia |pages=15–16 |chapter=The Sack of Constantinople (1204) |author-link=Nicetas Choniates}}
* {{Cite book |last=Cinnamus |first=Ioannes |title=Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus |publisher=Columbia University Press |date=1976 |isbn=978-0-231-04080-8 |location=New York and West Sussex |author-link=John Kinnamos}}
* {{Cite book |last=Eusebius |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iv.vi.i.i.html |title=Life of Constantine (Book IV) |publisher=[[Christian Classics Ethereal Library]] |author-link=Eusebius of Caesaria |access-date=25 May 2007 |archive-date=13 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200413122739/http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iv.vi.i.i.html |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Geoffrey of Villehardouin |url=https://archive.org/details/chroniclesofcrus00shaw |title=Chronicles of the Crusades (translated by Margaret R. Shaw) |publisher=Penguin Classics |date=1963 |isbn=978-0-14-044124-6 |chapter=The Conquest of Constantinople |author-link=Geoffrey of Villehardouin }}
* {{Cite book |last=Komnene |first=Anna |title=The Alexiad (translated by Elizabeth A.S. Dawes) |publisher=Internet Medieval Sourcebook |date=1928 |chapter=Books X–XIII |author-link=Anna Komnene |chapter-url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/annacomnena-alexiad00.html |access-date=18 May 2007 |archive-date=13 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200413122745/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/annacomnena-alexiad00.html |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/notitiadignitat00silvgoog |title=Notitia Dignitatum; accedunt Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae Laterculi Prouinciarum |publisher=Weidmann |date=1876 |editor-last=Seeck |editor-first=Otto |location=Berlin }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=79jH-QXdf0EC |title=Ioannis Scylitzae Synopsis historiarum |publisher=De Gruyter |date=1973 |isbn=978-3-11-002285-8 |editor-last=Thurn |editor-first=Hans |location=Berlin; New York |access-date=10 March 2018 |archive-date=15 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170315005138/https://books.google.com/books?id=79jH-QXdf0EC |url-status=live }}
{{Refend}}


====Secondary sources====
=== Books ===
{{Refbegin|40em}}
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Ahrweiler |first1=Hélène |title=Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire |last2=Laiou |first2=Angeliki E. |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-88402-247-3 |location=Washington, DC |chapter=Preface |author-link=Helene Ahrweiler |author-link2=Angeliki Laiou}}
* {{cite book |last=Andronikou |first=Anthi |year=2022 |title=Italy, Cyprus, and Artistic Exchange in the Medieval Mediterranean |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-316-51092-6 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=vkeEEAAAQBAJ}}}}
* {{Cite book |last=Alemany |first=Agustí |title=Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation |publisher=Brill |date=2000 |isbn=978-90-04-11442-5 |location=Leiden |pages=170–243}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ash |first=John |author-link=John Ash (writer) |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantinejourney00ashj |title=A Byzantine Journey |publisher=Random House |date=1995 |isbn=978-1-84511-307-0 |location=New York |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Anastos |first=Milton V. |date=1962 |title=The History of Byzantine Science. Report on the Dumbarton Oaks Symposium of 1961 |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=16 |pages=409–411 |doi=10.2307/1291170 |issn=0070-7546 |jstor=1291170}}
* {{cite book |last=Bartusis |first=Mark |date=1997 |title=The late Byzantine army: arms and society, 1204-1453 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |location=Philadelphia |isbn=978-0-8122-1620-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Angold |first=Michael |title=The Byzantine Empire, 1025–1204: A Political History |publisher=Longman |date=1997 |isbn=978-0-582-29468-4 |location=London}}
* {{cite book |last1=Berndt |first1=Guido M. |author1-link=:de:Guido M. Berndt |last2=Steinacher |first2=Roland |author2-link=Roland Steinacher |year=2014 |title=Arianism: Roman Heresy and Barbarian Creed |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8RsGDAAAQBAJ |location=London |publisher=Routledge |edition=1st |isbn=978-1-4094-4659-0}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Antonucci |first=Michael |date=1993 |title=War by Other Means: The Legacy of Byzantium |url=http://www.historytoday.com/michael-antonucci/war-other-means-legacy-byzantium |journal=History Today |volume=43 |issue=2 |pages=11–13 |issn=0018-2753 |access-date=21 May 2007 |archive-date=12 October 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171012025743/http://www.historytoday.com/michael-antonucci/war-other-means-legacy-byzantium |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last=Bennett |first=David |title=Medicine and Pharmacy in Byzantine Hospitals: A Study of the Extant Formularies |isbn=978-0-3678-7908-2 |year=2016 |publisher=Routledge |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Apostolides |first=Sophocles Evangelinus |title=Greek Lexicon of the Roman and Byzantine Periods |publisher=Georg Olms |date=1992 |isbn=978-3-487-05765-1 |location=Hildesheim}}
* {{Cite book |last=Browning |first=Robert |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantineempire/ |title=The Byzantine Empire |publisher=The Catholic University of America Press |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-8132-0754-4 |location=Washington DC |url-access=registration |author-link=Robert Browning (Byzantinist)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ash |first=John |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantinejourney00ashj |title=A Byzantine Journey |publisher=Random House Incorporated |date=1995 |isbn=978-1-84511-307-0 |location=New York |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |title=The Byzantines |date=2010 |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |isbn=978-1-4051-9833-2 |series=The Peoples of Europe |location=Oxford}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Austin |first=Roland G. |date=1934 |title=Zeno's Game of τάβλη |journal=The Journal of Hellenic Studies |volume=54 |issue=2 |pages=202–205 |doi=10.2307/626864 |jstor=626864|s2cid=163212104 }}
* {{cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |author-link=Averil Cameron |title=Byzantine Christianity: A Very Brief History |publisher=Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge |year=2017|isbn=9780281076147 |location=London}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Bayless |first=William N. |date=1976 |title=The Treaty with the Huns of 443 |journal=The American Journal of Philology |volume=97 |issue=2 |pages=176–179 |doi=10.2307/294410 |jstor=294410}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chitwood |first=Zachary |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/byzantine-legal-culture-and-the-roman-legal-tradition-8671056/EDF3AD1A74C4461805235605257DF9D6 |title=Byzantine Legal Culture and the Roman Legal Tradition, 867–1056 |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-18256-1 |location=Cambridge}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Baynes |first=Norman Hepburn |date=1912 |title=The Restoration of the Cross at Jerusalem |url=https://zenodo.org/record/2408558 |journal=The English Historical Review |volume=27 |issue=106 |pages=287–299 |doi=10.1093/ehr/XXVII.CVI.287 |issn=0013-8266 |access-date=30 June 2019 |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308150255/https://zenodo.org/record/2408558 |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Clark |first=Victoria |url=https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_o2c0 |title=Why Angels Fall: A Journey through Orthodox Europe from Byzantium to Kosovo |publisher=Macmillan |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-312-23396-9 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |title=Byzantium: An Introduction to East Roman Civilization |publisher=Clarendon Press |date=1948 |editor-last=Baynes |editor-first=Norman Hepburn |location=Oxford, England |editor-last2=Moss |editor-first2=Henry St. Lawrence Beaufort}}
* {{cite book |last=Constantelos |first=Demetrios |author-link=Demetrios Constantelos |title=Christian Hellenism: Essays and Studies in Continuity and Change |year=1998 |publisher=Aristides D. Caratzas |series=Studies in the Social & Religious History of the Medieval Greek World |volume=3 |location=New Rochelle |isbn=978-0-89241-588-5 |url=https://archive.org/details/christianhelleni0000cons/mode/2up |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite book |last=Baynes |first=Spencer |title=Encyclopædia Britannica |date=1907 |edition=11th |location=New York |chapter=Vlachs}}
* {{cite book |last=Cormack |first=Robin |author-link=Robin Cormack |year=2018 |orig-year=2000 |title=Byzantine Art |edition=2nd |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-877879-0 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=JnlQDwAAQBAJ}} }}
* {{Cite book |last=Beaton |first=Roderick |title=The Medieval Greek Romance |publisher=Routledge |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-415-12032-6 |location=New York and London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Davidson |first=Alan |editor-first1=Tom |editor-last1=Jaine |author-link=Alan Davidson (food writer) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RL6LAwAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Companion to Food |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2014 |isbn=978-0-19-967733-7 |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=14 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160514144822/https://books.google.com/books?id=RL6LAwAAQBAJ |url-status=live |editor1-link=Tom Jaine}}
* {{Cite book |last=Beckwith |first=John |title=Early Christian and Byzantine Art |publisher=Yale University Press |date=1993 |isbn=978-0-300-05296-1 |location=New Haven |orig-date=1970}}
* {{cite book |last=Decker |first=Michael |date=2013 |title=The Byzantine Art of War |publisher=Westholme Publishing |location=[[Yardley, Pennsylvania|Yardley]] |isbn=978-1-5941-6168-1}}
* {{Cite book |last=Béhar |first=Pierre |title=Vestiges d'Empires: La Décomposition de l'Europe Centrale et Balkanique |publisher=Éditions Desjonquères |date=1999 |isbn=978-2-84321-015-0 |location=Paris}}
* {{Cite book |last=Faas |first=Patrick |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YXGlAr17oekC |title=Around the Roman Table: Food and Feasting in Ancient Rome |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-226-23347-5 |orig-date=1994 |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=30 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160730151401/https://books.google.com/books?id=YXGlAr17oekC |url-status=live |location=Chicago}}
* {{Cite book |last=Benz |first=Ernst |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q5Z_evECb1UC |title=The Eastern Orthodox Church: Its Thought and Life |publisher=Aldine Transaction |date=1963 |isbn=978-0-202-36298-4 |location=Piscataway |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=30 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530161212/https://books.google.com/books?id=Q5Z_evECb1UC |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a5GFAgAAQBAJ |last=Garland |first=Lynda |author-link=Lynda Garland |title=Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium, AD 527–1204 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-415-14688-3 |access-date=21 June 2022 |archive-date=16 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116221034/https://books.google.com/books?id=a5GFAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Bideleux |first1=Robert |title=A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change |last2=Jeffries |first2=Ian |publisher=Routledge |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-415-16111-4 |location=New York and London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gregory |first=Timothy E. |title=A History of Byzantium |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |date=2010 |isbn=978-1-4051-8471-7 |location=Malden |author-link=Timothy E. Gregory}}
* {{Cite book |last=Birkenmeier |first=John W. |title=The Development of the Komnenian Army: 1081–1180 |publisher=Brill |date=2002 |isbn=978-90-04-11710-5 |location=Leiden}}
* {{cite book |last=Haldon |first=John |author-link=John Haldon |date=1999 |title=Warfare, State and Society in the Byzantine World |publisher=[[UCL Press]] |location=London |isbn=978-1-8572-8495-9}}
* {{Cite book |last=Blume |first=Fred H. |url=http://www.uwyo.edu/lawlib/blume-justinian/index.html |title=Annotated Justinian Code |publisher=University of Wyoming |date=2008 |editor-last=Kearley |editor-first=Timothy |location=Laramie |author-link=Fred H. Blume |access-date=3 July 2014 |archive-date=26 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160726124312/http://www.uwyo.edu/lawlib/blume-justinian/index.html |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Jonathan |title=Constantinople: Capital of Byzantium |date=2017 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-4742-5466-3 |edition=Second |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bowersock |first=G.M. |title=Julian the Apostate |publisher=Harvard University Press |date=1997 |isbn=978-0-674-48882-3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hodgkin |first=Thomas |title=Early Church history to the death of Constantine |date=1892 |edition = Third | publisher=Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent |location=London | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=5fBMAQAAMAAJ}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bray |first=R.S. |url=https://archive.org/details/armiesofpestilen0000bray |title=Armies of Pestilence: The Impact of Disease on History |publisher=James Clarke |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-227-17240-7 |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite book |title=Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers |year=2010 |last1=Horrocks |first1=Geoffrey |isbn=978-1-4051-3415-6 |edition=2nd |publisher=Wiley |author-link1=Geoffrey Horrocks (philologist)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Brooke |first=Zachary Nugent |title=A History of Europe, from 911 to 1198 |publisher=Methuen |date=1962 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Howard-Johnston |first=James |title=Byzantium: Economy, Society, Institutions 600–1100 |date=2024 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780198897880 |location=Oxford}}
* {{Cite book |last=Browning |first=Robert |title=Greece Old and New |publisher=Macmillan |date=1983 |isbn=978-0-333-27836-9 |editor-last=Winnifrith |editor-first=Tom |location=New York |pages=111–128 |chapter=The Continuity of Hellenism in the Byzantine world: Appearance or Reality? |editor-last2=Murray |editor-first2=Penelope}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Kaldellis |title=Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-87688-9 |location=Cambridge}}
* {{Cite book |last=Browning |first=Robert |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantineempire0000brow |title=The Byzantine Empire |publisher=The Catholic University of America Press |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-8132-0754-4 |location=Washington, DC |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=The New Roman Empire: A History of Byzantium |date=2023 |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |author-mask=3 |isbn=978-0197549322}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bryce |first=James |title=Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Vol. 1 |publisher=H. Frowde |date=1901 |isbn=978-1-4021-9046-9}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Kazhdan |first1=Alexander Petrovich |author-link=Alexander Kazhdan |title=Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries |last2=Wharton |first2=Annabel Jane |author-link2=Annabel Jane Wharton |publisher=University of California Press |year=1990 |isbn=9780520069626 |series=Transformation of the Classical Heritage |volume=7 |location=Berkeley}}
* {{Cite book |last=Burns |first=Thomas S. |title=A History of Ostrogoths |publisher=Indiana University Press |date=1991 |isbn=978-0-253-20600-8 |location=Bloomington and Indianapolis}}
* {{cite book |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander |year=1999 |title=A History of Byzantine Literature (650–850) |publisher=Institute for Byzantine Research |location=Athens |url=https://archive.org/details/Kazhdan1999ByzLit01/mode/2up |url-access=registration |isbn=978-960-371-010-3 |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bury |first=John Bagnall |url=https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/home.html |title=History of the Later Roman Empire |publisher=Macmillan |date=1923 |location=London |author-link=J. B. Bury |access-date=19 February 2021 |archive-date=12 October 2017 |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20171012025745/http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/home.html |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Laiou |first1=Angeliki E. |title=The Byzantine Economy |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/byzantine-economy/59786C4CA132FDEAA9F7F31472FAC2CB |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-84978-4 |last2=Morrisson |first2=Cécile}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Bury |first1=John Bagnall |title=The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century: With a Revised Text of the Kletorologion of Philotheos |last2=Philotheus |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1911 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lindberg |first=David |author-link=David C. Lindberg |title=The Beginnings of Western Science |title-link=The Beginnings of Western Science |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1992 |isbn=9780226482057 |location=Chicago}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Cameron |first=Averil |author-link=Averil Cameron |date=1979 |title=Images of Authority: Elites and Icons in Late Sixth-century Byzantium |journal=Past and Present |volume=84 |issue=1 |page=3 |doi=10.1093/past/84.1.3}}
* {{cite book |doi=10.1017/CHO9780511974007 |title=The Cambridge History of Science |volume=2: Medieval Science |year=2013 |editor-last1=Lindberg |editor-first1=David C. |editor-last2=Shank |editor-first2=Michael H. |isbn=978-0-511-97400-7 |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
* {{Cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |title=The Byzantines |publisher=Blackwell |date=2006 |isbn=978-1-4051-9833-2 |location=Oxford, England}}
** {{harvc |last=Tihon |first=Anne |c=Science in the Byzantine Empire |year=2013 |in1=Lindberg |in2=Shank |pages=190–206}}
* {{Cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |publisher=Psychogios |date=2009 |isbn=978-960-453-529-3 |location=Athens |language=el |script-title=el:Οι Βυζαντινοί}}
* {{cite book |last=Lowden |first=John |author-link=John Lowden |year=1997 |title=Early Christian & Byzantine Art |publisher=Phaidon Press |location=London |isbn=978-0-7148-3168-8 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_2900714831687}}
* {{Cite book |last=Campbell |first=George L. |url=https://archive.org/details/compendiumofworl00camp |title=Compendium of the World's Languages: Abaza to Kurdish |publisher=Routledge |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-415-20296-1 |location=New York and London |orig-date=1991 |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite book |last1=Matthews |first1=Roy T. |last2=Platt |first2=F. DeWitt |title=The Western Humanities |date=1997|publisher=Michigan State University|isbn=9781559344333|location=East Lansing}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chapman |first=John H. |title=Studies on the Early Papacy |publisher=Kennikat Press, University of Michigan |date=1971 |isbn=978-0-8046-1139-8}}
* {{cite book |last=Mellas |first=Andrew |year=2020 |title=Liturgy and the Emotions in Byzantium: Compunction and Hymnody |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-108-76736-1}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chrysos |first=Evangelos |title=Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990 (Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies) |publisher=Variorum |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-86078-338-1 |editor-last=Jonathan Shepard, Simon Franklin |chapter=Byzantine Diplomacy, CE 300–800: Means and End}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Merryman |first1=John Henry |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/ocm81252739 |title=The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America |last2=Pérez-Perdomo |first2=Rogelio |date=2007 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-5568-9 |edition=3rd |location=Stanford, California |author1-link=John Henry Merryman}}
* {{Cite book |last=Clark |first=Victoria |url=https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_o2c0 |title=Why Angels Fall: A Journey through Orthodox Europe from Byzantium to Kosovo |publisher=Macmillan |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-312-23396-9 |location=London }}
* {{cite book |last=Meyendorff |first=John |author-link=:ru:Мейендорф, Иван Феофилович |title=Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes |publisher=Fordham University Press |year=1979 |edition=illustrated, reprint, revised |isbn=978-0-8232-0967-5 |location=New York |url=https://www.thetbs.org/study-materials/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Byzantine-Theology-Historical-Trends-and-Doctrinal-Themes-by-John-Meyendorff-z-lib.org_.epub_.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240823182542/https://www.thetbs.org/study-materials/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Byzantine-Theology-Historical-Trends-and-Doctrinal-Themes-by-John-Meyendorff-z-lib.org_.epub_.pdf |archive-date=23 August 2024 |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite book |last=Cohen |first=H. Floris |url=https://archive.org/details/scientificrevolu00cohe |title=The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-226-11280-0 |location=Chicago, IL }}
* {{Cite book |last=Millar |first=Fergus |author-link=Fergus Millar |url=https://archive.org/details/greekromanempire00ferg |title=A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II (408–450) |publisher=University of California Press |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-520-24703-1 |location=Berkeley}}
* {{Cite book |last=Comrie |first=Bernard |title=Languages and Their Status |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-8122-1249-5 |editor-last=Shopen |editor-first=Timothy |location=Philadelphia |pages=91–152 |chapter=Russian}}
* {{cite book |last=Miller |first=Timothy S. |title=The Birth of the Hospital in the Byzantine Empire |isbn=978-0-8018-5657-0 |location=Baltimore|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |year=1997}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Dalby |first1=Andrew |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0bdvnQEACAAJ |title=Flavours and Delights: Tastes and Pleasures of Ancient and Byzantine Cuisine |last2=Bourbou |first2=Chryssi |last3=Koder |first3=Johannes |last4=Leontsinē |first4=Maria |publisher=Armos Publications |date=2013 |isbn=978-960-527-747-5 |location=Athens and Thessaloniki |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909110340/https://books.google.com/books?id=0bdvnQEACAAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |first=Donald M. |last=Nicol |author-link=Donald Nicol |title=The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261–1453 |edition=2nd |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y2d6OHLqwEsC |year=1993 |publisher=Rupert Hart-Davis |location=London |isbn=9780521439916 |access-date=11 December 2023 |archive-date=9 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230709030914/https://books.google.com/books?id=y2d6OHLqwEsC |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite book |last=Davidson |first=Alan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RL6LAwAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Companion to Food |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2014 |isbn=978-0-19-967733-7 |location=Oxford, England |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=14 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160514144822/https://books.google.com/books?id=RL6LAwAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Davies |first=Norman |url=https://archive.org/details/europehistory00davi_0 |title=Europe: A History |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-19-820171-7 |location=Oxford, England |author-link=Norman Davies |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Day |first=Gerald W. |date=1977 |title=Manuel and the Genoese: A Reappraisal of Byzantine Commercial Policy in the Late Twelfth Century |journal=The Journal of Economic History |volume=37 |issue=2 |pages=289–301 |doi=10.1017/S0022050700096947 |jstor=2118759|s2cid=155065665 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Dennis |first=George T. |title=Three Byzantine Military Treatises |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=1985 |location=Washington, DC}}
* {{Cite book |last=Diehl |first=Charles |title=Byzantium: An Introduction to East Roman Civilization |publisher=Clarendon |date=1948 |editor-last=Baynes |editor-first=Norman Hepburn |location=Oxford |chapter=Byzantine Art |oclc=1058121 |editor-last2=Moss |editor-first2=Henry St. Lawrence Beaufort}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Drake |first=HA. |date=1995 |title=Constantine and Consensus |journal=Church History |volume=64 |issue=1 |pages=1–15 |doi=10.2307/3168653 |jstor=3168653|s2cid=163129848 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Duiker |first1=William J. |title=The Essential World History |last2=Spielvogel |first2=Jackson J. |publisher=Wadsworth |date=2010 |isbn=978-0-495-90227-0 |location=Boston}}
* {{Cite book |last=El-Cheikh |first=Nadia Maria |title=Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs |publisher=Harvard University Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-932885-30-2 |location=Cambridge, MA}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ene D-Vasilescu|first=Elena |title=Michelangelo, the Byzantines, and Plato |publisher=Indep |date=2021 |isbn=978-1-80049-879-2 |location=Oxford}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ene D-Vasilescu|first=Elena |title=Creation and Time. Byzantine and Modern |publisher=Indep |date=2021 |isbn=978-1-80049-881-5 |location=Oxford}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ene D-Vasilescu|first=Elena |title=Glimpses into Byzantium. Its Philosophy and Arts |publisher=Indep |date=2021 |isbn=978-1-80049-880-8 |location=Oxford}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ene D-Vasilescu|first=Elena |title=Heavenly sustenance in Patristic texts and Byzantine iconography. Nourished by the Word|publisher=Palgrave |date=2018 |isbn=978-3-319-98985-3|location=Basingstoke and London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Esler |first=Philip Francis |title=The Early Christian World |publisher=Routledge |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-415-33312-2 |location=New York and London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Evans |first=James Allan Stewart |title=The Emperor Justinian and the Byzantine Empire |publisher=Greenwood |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-313-32582-3 |location=Westport}}
* {{Cite book |last=Evans |first=Helen C. |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantiumfaithpo0000unse |title=Byzantium, Faith and Power (1261–1557) |publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art/Yale University Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-1-58839-114-8 |location=New York, NY |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last=Faas |first=Patrick |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YXGlAr17oekC |title=Around the Roman Table: Food and Feasting in Ancient Rome |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-226-23347-5 |location=Chicago, IL |orig-date=1994 |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=30 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160730151401/https://books.google.com/books?id=YXGlAr17oekC |url-status=live }}
* {{The Early Medieval Balkans }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Foss |first=Clive |date=1975 |title=The Persians in Asia Minor and the end of antiquity |journal=The English Historical Review |volume=90 |issue=357 |pages=721–747 |doi=10.1093/ehr/XC.CCCLVII.721 |jstor=567292}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Fossier |first1=Robert |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgeillustr00robe |title=The Cambridge Illustrated History of the Middle Ages |last2=Sondheimer |first2=Janet |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1997 |isbn=978-0-521-26644-4 |location=Cambridge, England }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Fouracre |first1=Paul |title=Late Merovingian France: History and Hagiography, 640–720 |last2=Gerberding |first2=Richard A. |publisher=Manchester University Press |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-7190-4791-6 |location=Manchester, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Freeman |first=Charles |url=https://archive.org/details/greekachievement0000free |title=The Greek Achievement&nbsp;– The Foundation of the Western World |publisher=Penguin |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-670-88515-2 |location=New York }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Friell |first1=Gerard |title=Theodosius: The Empire at Bay |last2=Williams |first2=Stephen |publisher=Routledge |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-135-78262-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gabriel |first=Richard A. |title=The Great Armies of Antiquity |publisher=Greenwood |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-275-97809-9 |location=Westport}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a5GFAgAAQBAJ |last=Garland |first=Lynda |title=Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium, AD 527–1204 |publisher=Routledge |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-415-14688-3 |location=New York and London |access-date=21 June 2022 |archive-date=16 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116221034/https://books.google.com/books?id=a5GFAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Gibbon |first=Edward |title=The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Volumes II, III, and IX) |publisher=Fred de Fau |date=1906 |editor-last=J.B. Bury (with an Introduction by W.E.H. Lecky) |location=New York, NY |author-link=Edward Gibbon}}
* {{Cite book |last=Grabar |first=André |title=L'iconoclasme Byzantin: le dossier archéologique |publisher=Flammarion |date=1984 |isbn=978-2-08-081634-4}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Grant |first=Robert M. |date=1975 |title=Religion and Politics at the Council at Nicaea |journal=The Journal of Religion |volume=55 |issue=1 |pages=1–12 |doi=10.1086/486406 |jstor=1202069 |s2cid=170410226}}
* {{Cite book |last=Greatrex |first=Geoffrey B. |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgecompani00maas_760 |title=The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-521-81746-2 |editor-last=Maas |editor-first=Michael |location=Cambridge, England |pages=[https://archive.org/details/cambridgecompani00maas_760/page/n471 477]–509 |chapter=Byzantium and the East in the Sixth Century |url-access=limited }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Greatrex |first1=Geoffrey |title=The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars (Part II, 363–630 AD) |last2=Lieu |first2=Samuel N.C. |publisher=Routledge |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-415-14687-6 |location=New York and London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gregory |first=Timothy E. |title=A History of Byzantium |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |date=2010 |isbn=978-1-4051-8471-7 |location=Malden}}
* {{Cite book |last=Grierson |first=Philip |url=http://www.doaks.org/byzcoins.pdf |title=Byzantine Coinage |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-88402-274-9 |location=Washington, DC |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927000204/http://www.doaks.org/byzcoins.pdf |archive-date=27 September 2007 |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last=Gross |first=Feliks |title=Citizenship and Ethnicity: The Growth and Development of a Democratic Multiethnic Institution |publisher=Greenwood |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-313-30932-8 |location=Westport}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gutas |first=Dimitri |title=Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement |publisher=Routledge |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-415-06132-2 |location=New York and London}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Hacikyan |first1=Agop Jack |title=The Heritage of Armenian Literature: From the Sixth to the Eighteenth Century |last2=Basmajian |first2=Gabriel |last3=Franchuk |first3=Edward S. |last4=Ouzounian |first4=Nourhan |publisher=Wayne State University Press |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-8143-3023-4 |location=Detroit}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haldon |first=John |title=Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-31917-1 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haldon |first=John |title=The Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East VI: Elites Old and New in the Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East |publisher=Darwin |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-87850-144-1 |editor-last=John Haldon and Lawrence I. Conrad |chapter=The Fate of the Late Roman Senatorial Elite: Extinction or Transformation?}}
* {{Cite web |last=Halsall |first=Paul |date=1998 |title=East Asian History Sourcebook: Chinese Accounts of Rome, Byzantium and the Middle East, c. 91 B.C.E.&nbsp;– 1643 C.E. |url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/eastasia/romchin1.html |access-date=21 April 2012 |publisher=Fordham University |location=New York, NY |archive-date=10 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910050947/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/eastasia/romchin1.html |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book|last=Halsall|first=Guy|title=Transformations of Romanness: Early Medieval Regions and Identities|publisher=De Gruyter|year=2018|editor1-last=Pohl|editor1-first=Walter|chapter=Transformations of Romanness: The northern Gallic case|editor2-last=Gantner|editor2-first=Clemens|editor3-last=Grifoni|editor3-first=Cinzia |location=Berlin |isbn=978-3-11-059838-4}}
* {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Jonathan |title=Byzantium and the Crusades |publisher=Bloomsbury |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-78093-767-0 |edition=2nd}}
* {{Cite book |last=Harvey |first=Alan |title=Economic Expansion in the Byzantine Empire, 900–1200 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-521-52190-1 |location=Cambridge}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haywood |first=John |title=Cassell's Atlas of World History |publisher=Cassell |date=2001 |isbn=978-0-304-35757-4 |location=London |orig-date=1997}}
* {{Cite book |last=Heather |first=Peter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dYR4ngEACAAJ |title=The Fall of the Roman Empire |publisher=Macmillan |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-330-49136-5 |location=London |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=30 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530084510/https://books.google.com/books?id=dYR4ngEACAAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Hindley |first=Geoffrey |url=https://archive.org/details/briefhistoryofcr0000hind |title=A Brief History of the Crusades |publisher=Robinson |date=2004 |isbn=978-1-84119-766-1 |location=London |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Hooper |first1=Nicholas |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgeillustr00nich |title=The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: The Middle Ages |last2=Bennett |first2=Matthew |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-521-44049-3 |location=Cambridge, England }}
* {{Cite book |last=James |first=Liz |title=A Companion to Byzantium |publisher=John Wiley |date=2010 |isbn=978-1-4051-2654-0 |location=Chichester}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Jayyusi |first1=Salma Khadra |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cbfORLWv1HkC |title=The Legacy of Muslim Spain |last2=Marín |first2=Manuela |publisher=E.J. Brill |date=1994 |isbn=978-90-04-09599-1 |edition=2nd |location=Leiden, New York and Köln |orig-date=1992 |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=29 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160529093712/https://books.google.com/books?id=cbfORLWv1HkC |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Jenkins |first=Romilly James Heald |title=Byzantium: The Imperial Centuries, CE 610–1071 |publisher=University of Toronto Press |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-8020-6667-1 |location=Toronto |author-link=Romilly James Heald Jenkins}}
* {{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Arnold Hugh Martin |url=https://archive.org/details/laterromanempire01jone |title=The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social Economic and Administrative Survey |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |date=1986 |isbn=978-0-8018-3353-3 |location=Baltimore |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kaegi |first=Walter Emil |title=Heraclius, Emperor of Byzantium |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-521-81459-1 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-87688-9 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=The Byzantine Republic: People and Power in New Rome |publisher=Harvard University Press |date=2015 |isbn=978-0-674-36540-7}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Karlin-Heyer |first=P. |date=1967 |title=When Military Affairs Were in Leo's Hands: A Note on Byzantine Foreign Policy (886–912) |journal=Tradition |volume=23 |pages=15–40 |doi=10.1017/S0362152900008722 |jstor=27830825|s2cid=152098357 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kartomi |first=Margaret J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gYSOnQEACAAJ |title=On Concepts and Classifications of Musical Instruments |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-226-42548-1 |location=Chicago, IL |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909072926/https://books.google.com/books?id=gYSOnQEACAAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kazanaki-Lappa |first=Maria |title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2) |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=2002 |editor-last=Angeliki E. Laiou |location=Washington, DC |pages=639–646 |chapter=Medieval Athens |chapter-url=http://www.doaks.org/publications/doaks_online_publications/EconHist/EHB29.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120218231247/http://www.doaks.org/publications/doaks_online_publications/EconHist/EHB29.pdf |archive-date=18 February 2012 |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |title=Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium |title-link=Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1991 |isbn=978-0-19-504652-6 |editor-last=Kazhdan |editor-first=Alexander Petrovich |editor-link=Alexander Kazhdan |location=New York and Oxford}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Kazhdan |first1=Alexander Petrovich |title=People and Power in Byzantium: An Introduction to Modern Byzantine Studies |last2=Constable |first2=Giles |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=1982 |isbn=978-0-88402-103-2 |location=Washington, DC}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Kazhdan |first1=Aleksandr Petrovich |title=Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries |last2=Epstein |first2=Ann Wharton |publisher=University of California Press |date=1985 |isbn=978-0-520-05129-4 |location=Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kean |first=Roger Michael |title=Forgotten Power: Byzantium: Bulwark of Christianity |publisher=Thalamus |date=2006 |isbn=978-1-902886-07-7 |location=Shropshire}}
* {{Cite journal |last=King |first=David A. |date=March 1991 |title=Reviews: ''The Astronomical Works of Gregory Chioniades, Volume I: The Zij al- Ala'i'' by Gregory Chioniades, David Pingree; ''An Eleventh-Century Manual of Arabo-Byzantine Astronomy'' by Alexander Jones |journal=[[Isis (journal)|Isis]] |volume=82 |issue=1 |pages=116–118 |doi=10.1086/355661 |title-link=David Pingree}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Klein |first=Holgen A. |date=2004 |title=Eastern Objects and Western Desires: Relics and Reliquaries between Byzantium and the West |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=58 |pages=283–314 |doi=10.2307/3591389 |jstor=3591389}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Klewitz|first1=Hans-Walter|title=Eduard Eichmann, Die Kaiserkrönung im Abendland. Ein Beitrag zur, Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des kirchlichen Rechts, der Liturgie und der Kirchenpolitik|journal=Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung|date=1 January 1943|volume=32|issue=1|pages=509–525|doi=10.7767/zrgka.1943.32.1.509|s2cid=183386465|url=https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zrgka.1943.32.issue-1/zrgka.1943.32.1.509/zrgka.1943.32.1.509.xml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180222071154/https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zrgka.1943.32.issue-1/zrgka.1943.32.1.509/zrgka.1943.32.1.509.xml|archive-date=22 February 2018|access-date=21 February 2018|ref=CITEREFKlewitz}}
* {{Cite book |last=Köprülü |first=Mehmet Fuad |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D-WaKed2iNgC |title=The Origins of the Ottoman Empire |publisher=State University of New York Press |others=Translated and edited by Gary Leiser |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-7914-0819-3 |location=Albany, NY |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909094240/https://books.google.com/books?id=D-WaKed2iNgC |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kountoura-Galake |first=Eleonora |publisher=Ethniko Idryma Erevnon |date=1996 |isbn=978-960-7094-46-9 |location=Athens |language=el |script-title=el:Ο βυζαντινός κλήρος και η κοινωνία των "Σκοτεινών Αἰώνων |trans-title=The Byzantine Clergy and the Society of the 'Dark Ages'}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Kuhoff |first=Wolfgang |date=2002 |title=de:Die diokletianische Tetrarchie als Epoche einer historischen Wende in antiker und moderner Sicht |journal=International Journal of the Classical Tradition |language=de |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=177–194 |doi=10.1007/BF02898434 |jstor=30224306 |s2cid=162343296}}
* {{Cite book |last=Laiou |first=Angeliki E. |title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 1) |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=2002a |editor-last=Angeliki E. Laiou |location=Washington, DC |pages=3–8 |chapter=Writing the Economic History of Byzantium |author-link=Angeliki Laiou |chapter-url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/EHB01-Writing%20the%20economic%20history%20of%20Byzantium.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114212/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/EHB01-Writing%20the%20economic%20history%20of%20Byzantium.pdf |archive-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last=Laiou |first=Angeliki E. |title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2) |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=2002b |editor-last=Angeliki E. Laiou |location=Washington, DC |pages=697–770 |chapter=Exchange and Trade, Seventh-Twelfth Centuries |chapter-url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb36-trade |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114425/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb36-trade |archive-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Laiou |first1=Angeliki E. |title=The Byzantine Economy |last2=Morisson |first2=Cécile |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-84978-4 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Lapidge |first1=Michael |title=The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England |last2=Blair |first2=John |last3=Keynes |first3=Simon |publisher=Blackwell |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-631-22492-1 |location=Malden}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lenski |first=Noel |date=1999 |title=Assimilation and Revolt in the Territory of Isauria, From the 1st Century BC to the 6th Century AD |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient |volume=42 |issue=4 |pages=413–465 |doi=10.1163/1568520991201687 |issn=0022-4995 |jstor=3632602}}
* {{New Cambridge Medieval History|volume=1|last=Louth |first=Andrew |chapter=The Byzantine Empire in the Seventh Century |pages=289–316 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lowry |first=Heath W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=31j8T6XoigYC |title=The Nature of the Early Ottoman State |publisher=State University of New York Press |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-7914-8726-6 |location=Albany, NY |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909092117/https://books.google.com/books?id=31j8T6XoigYC |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Madden |first=Thomas F. |title=Crusades: The Illustrated History |publisher=University of Michigan Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-472-03127-6 |location=Ann Arbor |author-link=Thomas F. Madden}}
* {{Cite book |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |title=The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143–1180 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2002a |isbn=978-0-521-52653-1 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2) |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=2002b |editor-last=Angeliki E. Laiou |location=Washington, DC |pages=529–537 |chapter=Medieval Constantinople: Built Environment and Urban Development |chapter-url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb20-cp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114407/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb20-cp |archive-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last=Mango |first=Cyril A. |publisher=Educational Institution of the National Bank of Greece |date=2007 |location=Athens |language=el |translator-last=Dimitris Tsoungarakis |script-title=el:Η Αυτοκρατορία της Νέας Ρώμης |trans-title=Byzantium: The Empire of the New Rome |author-link=Cyril Mango}}
* {{Cite book |last=Mango |first=Cyril A. |title=The Oxford History of Byzantium |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-19-814098-6 |location=Oxford |author-link=Cyril Mango}}
* {{Cite book |last=Matschke |first=Klaus-Peter |title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2) |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=2002 |editor-last=Angeliki E. Laiou |location=Washington, DC |pages=771–806 |chapter=Commerce, Trade, Markets, and Money: Thirteenth-Fifteenth Centuries |chapter-url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb37-trade-late |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114138/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb37-trade-late |archive-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last=McDonnell |first=Myles Anthony |title=Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-521-82788-1 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Meier |first=William N. |date=2003 |title=Die Inszenierung einer Katastrophe: Justinian und der Nika-Aufstand |journal=Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik |volume=142 |issue=142 |pages=273–300 |jstor=20191600}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Merryman |first1=John Henry |title=The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America |last2=Perez-Perdomo |first2=Rogelio |publisher=Stanford University Press |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-8047-5569-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Meyendorff |first=John |title=The Byzantine Legacy in the Orthodox Church |publisher=St Vladimir's Seminary Press |date=1982 |isbn=978-0-913836-90-3 |location=Yonkers |author-link=John Meyendorff}}
* {{Cite book |last=Millar |first=Fergus |url=https://archive.org/details/greekromanempire00ferg |title=A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II (408–450) |publisher=University of California Press |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-520-24703-1 |location=Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Miller |first=William |date=1907 |title=Monemvasia |url=https://archive.org/stream/journalofhelleni27sociuoft |journal=The Journal of Hellenic Studies |volume=27 |pages=229–301 |doi=10.2307/624442 |jstor=624442 |s2cid=250246026 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Moravcsik |first=Gyula |title=Byzantium and the Magyars |publisher=Hakkert |date=1970 |location=Amsterdam}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Neumann |first=Iver B. |date=2006 |title=Sublime Diplomacy: Byzantine, Early Modern, Contemporary |url=http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6cc4/347b1f756fc236a4468b43e1cee5206b54f2.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=Millennium: Journal of International Studies |volume=34 |issue=3 |pages=865–888 |doi=10.1177/03058298060340030201 |issn=1569-2981 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727060750/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6cc4/347b1f756fc236a4468b43e1cee5206b54f2.pdf |archive-date=2020-07-27 |s2cid=144773343 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Neville |first=Leonora Alice |title=Authority in Byzantine Provincial Society, 950–1100 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-521-83865-8 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nicol |first=Donald M. |title=The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350–c. 1450 |title-link=The Cambridge History of Political Thought |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1988 |isbn=978-0-52-142388-5 |editor-last=Burns |editor-first=J. H. |location=Cambridge, England |pages=51–79 |chapter=Byzantine political thought |author-link=Donald Nicol |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jEa8Iv5wJ0IC&pg=PA51 |access-date=10 June 2021 |archive-date=24 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220524014838/https://books.google.com/books?id=jEa8Iv5wJ0IC&pg=PA51 |url-status=live }}
* {{The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261–1453}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nicol |first=Donald M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7bXGTfK_ogAC |title=The Reluctant Emperor: A Biography of John Cantacuzene, Byzantine Emperor and Monk, c. 1295–1383 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-521-52201-4 |location=Cambridge, England |author-link=Donald M. Nicol |access-date=27 September 2020 |archive-date=24 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200124235419/https://books.google.com/books?id=7bXGTfK_ogAC |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Norwich |first=John Julius |title=A Short History of Byzantium |publisher=Penguin |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-14-025960-5 |location=Ringwood, Vic.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Norwich |first=John Julius |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cd-AAAAAIAAJ |title=A History of Venice |publisher=Alfred A. Knopf Inc. |date=1982 |isbn=978-0-394-52410-8 |location=New York |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909092314/https://books.google.com/books?id=Cd-AAAAAIAAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou |first=Maria |date=1970 |script-title=el:Συμβολή εις την χρονολόγησιν των Αβαρικών και Σλαβικών επιδρομών επί Μαυρικίου (582–602) (μετ' επιμέτρου περί των Περσικών πολέμων) |trans-title=Contribution to the chronology of Avar and Slav raids during the reign of Maurice (582–602), with an excursus about the Persian Wars |url=http://www.byzsym.org/index.php/bz/article/view/649/567 |url-status=dead |journal=Byzantina Symmeikta |language=el |volume=2 |pages=145–206 |doi=10.12681/byzsym.649 |issn=1105-1639 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120627021404/http://www.byzsym.org/index.php/bz/article/view/649/567 |archive-date=27 June 2012 |access-date=10 March 2012 |doi-access=free }}
* {{Cite book |last=Obolensky |first=Dimitri |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RlBoAAAAMAAJ |title=The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500–1453 |publisher=Cardinal |date=1974 |isbn=978-0-351-17644-9 |location=London |author-link=Dimitri Obolensky |orig-date=1971 |access-date=8 March 2018 |archive-date=27 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727155111/https://books.google.com/books?id=RlBoAAAAMAAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Obolensky |first=Dimitri |title=Byzantium and the Slavs |publisher=St Vladimir's Seminary Press |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-88141-008-2 |location=Yonkers |author-link=Dimitri Obolensky}}
* {{Cite book |last=Obolensky |first=Dimitri |title=Byzantium and the Slavs |publisher=St Vladimir's Seminary Press |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-88141-008-2 |location=Yonkers |author-link=Dimitri Obolensky}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Oikonomides |first=Nikos |date=1999 |title=L᾽"Unilinguisme" Officiel de Constantinople Byzantine |journal=Byzantina Symmeikta |volume=13 |pages=9–22 |doi=10.12681/byzsym.857 |issn=1105-1639 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite book |last=Partington |first=J. R. |author-link=J. R. Partington |title=A History of Greek Fire and Gunpowder |publisher=The Johns Hopkins University Press |year=1999 |isbn=9780801859540 |location=Baltimore}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ostrogorsky |first=George |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofbyzanti00ostr |title=History of the Byzantine State |publisher=Rutgers University Press |date=1969 |isbn=978-0-8135-1198-6 |location=New Brunswick |author-link=George Alexandrovič Ostrogorsky |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ring |first=Trudy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R44VRnNCzAYC |title=International Dictionary of Historic Places: Middle East and Africa |publisher=Taylor & Francis |date=1994 |isbn=978-1-884964-03-9 |volume=4 |access-date=23 October 2016 |archive-date=9 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190609091417/https://books.google.com/books?id=R44VRnNCzAYC |url-status=live |location=London}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Ostrogorsky |first=George |date=1959 |title=The Byzantine Empire in the World of the Seventh Century |url=http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e065/05698b96313d40aa3d7ef598669cdfef523d.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=13 |pages=1–21 |doi=10.2307/1291127 |jstor=1291126 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727061111/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e065/05698b96313d40aa3d7ef598669cdfef523d.pdf |archive-date=2020-07-27 |s2cid=165376375 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Robins |first=Robert Henry |title=The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History |publisher=Mouton de Gruyter |date=1993 |isbn=978-3-11-013574-9 |location=Berlin |author-link=R. H. Robins}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Paparrigopoulos |first1=Constantine |last2=Karolidis |first2=Pavlos |publisher=Eleftheroudakis |date=1925 |volume=4 |language=el |script-title=el:Ιστορία του Ελληνικού Έθνους |trans-title=History of the Greek Nation |author-link=Constantine Paparrigopoulos |author-link2=Pavlos Karolidis}}
* {{cite book |last=Rodley |first=Lyn |year=1994 |title=Byzantine Art and Architecture: An Introduction |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0-521-35724-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantineartarch0000rodl/page/n3/mode/2up |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite book |last=Parry |first=Kenneth |title=Depicting the Word: Byzantine Iconophile Thought of the Eighth and Ninth Centuries |publisher=Brill |date=1996 |isbn=978-90-04-10502-7 |location=Leiden and New York}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rosser |first=John H. |title=Historical Dictionary of Byzantium |date=2011 |publisher=Scarecrow Press |isbn=9780810874770 |location=Lanham, Maryland}}
* {{Cite book |last=Patterson |first=Gordon M. |title=The Essentials of Medieval History: 500 to 1450 AD, the Middle Ages |publisher=Research and Education Association |date=1995 |isbn=978-0-87891-705-1 |location=Piscataway |orig-date=1990}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rotman |first=Youval |title=Byzantine Slavery and the Mediterranean World |date=2009 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-03611-6 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts}}
* {{Cite book |last=Perrottet |first=Tony |title=The Naked Olympics: The True Story of the Ancient Games |publisher=Random House |date=2004 |isbn=978-1-58836-382-4}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rotman |first=Youval |title=Slaveries of the First Millennium |date=2022 |publisher=Amsterdam University Press |isbn=978-1-64189-172-1 |author-mask=3 |location=Amsterdam |doi=10.2307/j.ctv2175h0p |jstor=j.ctv2175h0p}}
* {{Citation |last=Pohl |first=Walter |title=Introduction: Early medieval Romanness – a multiple identity |date=2018-06-25 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110598384-004 |work=Transformations of Romanness |pages=3–40 |access-date=2023-04-27 |publisher=De Gruyter|doi=10.1515/9783110598384-004 |isbn=978-3-11-059838-4 |s2cid=165819037 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Sabo |first1=Theodore |title=From Monophysitism to Nestorianism: AD 431–681 |date=2018 |publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing |isbn=978-1-5275-0959-7|location=Newcastle upon Tyne}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Postan |first1=Michael Moïssey |title=The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (Volume 2) |last2=Miller |first2=Edward |last3=Postan |first3=Cynthia |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-521-08709-4 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Seton-Watson |first=Hugh |title=The Russian Empire, 1801–1917 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1967 |isbn=978-0-1982-2152-4 |author-link=Hugh Seton-Watson |location=London |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/russianempire1800000seto/mode/2up}}
* {{Cite book |last=Pounds |first=Norman John Greville |url=https://archive.org/details/historicalgeogra0000poun |title=An Historical Geography of Europe, 1500–1840 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1979 |isbn=978-0-521-22379-9 |location=Cambridge, England }}
* {{Cite book |last=Stathakopoulos |first=Dionysios Ch. |title=A Short History of the Byzantine Empire |date=2023 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-350-23340-9 |series=Short Histories |location=London}}
* {{cite journal | last=Ragkou | first=Katerina | title=The Economic Centrality of Urban Centers in the Medieval Peloponnese: Late 11th–Mid-14th Centuries | journal=Land | publisher=MDPI AG | volume=7 | issue=4 | date=2018-12-07 | issn=2073-445X | doi=10.3390/land7040153 | page=153| doi-access=free }}
* {{Cite book |last=Stein |first=Peter |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814723 |title=Roman Law in European History |date=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-64372-6 |location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511814723 |author-link=Peter Stein (legal scholar)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Read |first=Piers Paul |title=The Templars: The Dramatic History of the Knights Templar, The Most Powerful Military Order of the Crusades |publisher=St. Martin's Press |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-312-26658-5 |location=New York |author-link=Piers Paul Read |orig-date=1999}}
* {{Cite book |location=London |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781136727870 |title=The Byzantine World |date=2010 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-72787-0 |editor-last=Stephenson |editor-first=Paul}}
* {{Cite book |last=Reinert |first=Stephen W. |title=The Oxford History of Byzantium |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2002 |isbn=978-0-19-814098-6 |editor-last=Cyril Mango |location=Oxford, England |pages=248–283 |chapter=Fragmentation (1204–1453)}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Tatakes |first1=Vasileios N. |title=Byzantine Philosophy |last2=Moutafakis |first2=Nicholas J. |publisher=Hackett |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-8722-0563-5 |location=Indianapolis}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rice |first=David Talbot |title=Byzantine Art |publisher=Penguin Books Limited |date=1968 |edition=3rd |location=Harmondsworth |author-link=David Talbot Rice}}
* {{Cite book |last=Treadgold |first=Warren T. |title=Byzantium and its Army: 284–1081 |date=1995 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-3163-8 |location=Stanford |author-link=Warren Treadgold}}
* {{Cite book |last=Robins |first=Robert Henry |title=The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History |publisher=Mouton de Gruyter |date=1993 |isbn=978-3-11-013574-9 |location=Berlin and New York}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rosser |first=John H. |title=Historical Dictionary of Byzantium |publisher=Scarecrow |date=2011 |isbn=978-0-8108-7567-8 |location=Lanham, MA |chapter=Introduction}}
* {{Cite book |last=Runciman |first=Steven |title=The Fall of Constantinople, 1453 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-39832-9 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Runciman |first=Steven |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YQYe7VGlym8C |title=The Byzantine Theocracy |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-521-54591-4 |location=Cambridge, England |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=9 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909110319/https://books.google.com/books?id=YQYe7VGlym8C |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Salaman |first=Rena |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_rbDzAYGcUa8C/page/184 |title=Oxford Symposium on Food & Cookery 1984 & 1985: Cookery: Science, Lore & Books: Proceedings (Introduction by Alan Davidson) |publisher=Prospect Books Limited |date=1986 |isbn=978-0-907325-16-1 |editor-last=Jaine |editor-first=Tom |location=London |pages=[https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_rbDzAYGcUa8C/page/184 184–187] |chapter=The Case of the Missing Fish, or ''Dolmathon'' Prolegomena |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jYa3J6xrjt4C }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Sarantis |first=Alexander |date=2009 |title=War and Diplomacy in Pannonia and the Northwest Balkans during the Reign of Justinian: The Gepid Threat and Imperial Responses |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=63 |pages=15–40 |jstor=41219761}}
* {{Cite book |last=Sedlar |first=Jean W. |title=East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000–1500 |publisher=University of Washington Press |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-295-97290-9 |volume=III |location=Seattle}}
* {{Cite book |last=Seton-Watson |first=Hugh |title=The Russian Empire, 1801–1917 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1967 |isbn=978-0-19-822152-4 |location=Oxford, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Sotinel |first=Claire |title=The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-521-81746-2 |editor-last=Maas |editor-first=Michael |location=Cambridge, England |pages=267–290 |chapter=Emperors and Popes in the Sixth Century: The Western View}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Speck |first=Paul |date=1984 |title=Ikonoklasmus und die Anfänge der Makedonischen Renaissance |journal=Poikila Byzantina |volume=4 |pages=175–210}}
* {{Cite book |last=Stephenson |first=Paul |title=Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-521-77017-0 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Tarasov |first1=Oleg |title=Icon and Devotion: Sacred Spaces in Imperial Russia |last2=Milner-Gulland |first2=R.R. |publisher=Reaktion |date=2004 |isbn=978-1-86189-118-1 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Tatakes |first1=Vasileios N. |title=Byzantine Philosophy |title-link=Byzantine Philosophy |last2=Moutafakis |first2=Nicholas J. |publisher=Hackett |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-87220-563-5 |location=Indianapolis}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Teall |first=John L. |date=1967 |title=The Age of Constantine Change and Continuity in Administration and Economy |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=21 |pages=11–36 |doi=10.2307/1291256 |jstor=1291256}}
* {{Cite book |last=Timberlake |first=Alan |title=A Reference Grammar of Russian |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-521-77292-1 |location=Cambridge, England}}
* {{Cite book |last=Treadgold |first=Warren |title=Byzantium and Its Army, 284–1081 |publisher=Stanford University Press |date=1995 |isbn=978-0-8047-2420-3 |location=Stanford}}
* {{A History of the Byzantine State and Society}}
* {{A History of the Byzantine State and Society}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Troianos |first1=Spyros |last2=Velissaropoulou-Karakosta |first2=Julia |publisher=Sakkoulas |date=1997 |isbn=978-960-232-594-0 |location=Athens |language=el |script-title=el:Ιστορία δικαίου από την αρχαία στην νεώτερη Ελλάδα |trans-title=History of law from ancient to modern Greece}}
* {{Cite book |last=Treadgold |first=Warren T. |title=A History of the Byzantine State and Society |date=1997b |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-7937-1 |location=Redwood City}}
* {{Cite book |last=Vasiliev |first=Alexander Alexandrovich |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofbyzanti0000vasi |title=History of the Byzantine Empire |publisher=The University of Wisconsin Press |date=1928–1935 |isbn=978-0-299-80925-6 |location=Madison |author-link=Alexander Vasiliev (historian) }}
* {{cite book|last = Treadgold |first = Warren |author-link = Warren Treadgold |title= A Concise History of Byzantium, 25th Anniversary Edition |year =2025 |publisher = Bloomsbury Academic |isbn = 978-1-350-54133-7 |url= {{GBurl|zYNJEQAAQBAJ}} }}
* {{Cite book |last=Versteegh |first=Cornelis H.M. |title=Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking |publisher=Brill |date=1977 |isbn=978-90-04-04855-3 |location=Leiden}}
* {{Cite book |last=Unwin |first=P. T. H. |title=Wine and the Vine: An Historical Geography of Viticulture and the Wine Trade |date=2010 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-14416-2 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Vryonis |first=Speros |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wBpIAAAAMAAJ |title=The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century |publisher=University of California Press |date=1971 |isbn=978-0-520-01597-5 |location=Berkeley, CA |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=26 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200626102729/https://books.google.com/books?id=wBpIAAAAMAAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Vryonis |first=Speros |author-link=Speros Vryonis |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wBpIAAAAMAAJ |title=The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century |publisher=University of California Press |date=1971 |isbn=978-0-520-01597-5 |location=Berkeley |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=26 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200626102729/https://books.google.com/books?id=wBpIAAAAMAAJ |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite book |last=Watson |first=Bruce |title=Sieges: A Comparative Study |publisher=Praeger |date=1993 |isbn=978-0-275-94034-8 |location=Westport}}
{{Refend}}
* {{Cite book |last=Weitzmann |first=Kurt |title=The Icon |publisher=Evans Brothers |date=1982 |isbn=978-0-237-45645-0 |location=London |author-link=Kurt Weitzmann}}
 
* {{Cite book |last=Wells |first=Herbert George |title=A Short History of the World |publisher=Macmillan |date=1922 |isbn=978-0-06-492674-4 |location=New York |author-link=H. G. Wells}}
=== Journals ===
* {{The Making of Byzantium, 600–1025}}
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wickham |first=Chris |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780670020980 |title=The Inheritance of Rome: A History of Europe from 400 to 1000 |publisher=Viking |date=2009 |isbn=978-0-670-02098-0 |location=New York |author-link=Christopher Wickham }}
* {{cite journal |last=Adams |first=Robert Merrihew |author-link=Robert Merrihew Adams |title=Nestorius and Nestorianism |year=2021 |journal=The Monist |volume=104 |issue=3 |pages=366–375 |doi=10.1093/monist/onab005}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Wolff |first=Robert Lee |date=1948 |title=Romania: The Latin Empire of Constantinople |journal=Speculum |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=1–34 |doi=10.2307/2853672 |jstor=2853672 |s2cid=162802725}}
* {{cite journal |last=Brown |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Brown (historian) |title=Eastern and Western Christendom in Late Antiquity: A Parting of the Way |journal=Studies in Church History |year=1976 |volume=13 |pages=1–24 |doi=10.1017/S0424208400006574}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wroth |first=Warwick |title=Catalogue of the Imperial Byzantine Coins in the British Museum |publisher=British Museum Dept. of Coins and Medals |date=1908 |isbn=978-1-4021-8954-8}}
* {{cite journal |last=Browning |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Browning (Byzantinist) |date=1982 |title=Greek diglossia yesterday and today |journal=[[International Journal of the Sociology of Language]] |issue=35 |pages=49–68 |doi=10.1515/ijsl.1982.35.49}}
* {{cite journal |last=Cameron |first=Averil |title=Late Antiquity and Byzantium: An Identity Problem |journal=[[Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies]] |year=2016 |volume=40 |issue=1 |pages=27–37 |doi=10.1017/byz.2015.4}}
* {{cite journal |last=van Dieten |first=Jan Louis |year=1980 |title=Die Byzantinische Literatur – Eine Literatur Ohne Geschichte? |trans-title=Byzantine Literature – A Literature Without History? |language=de |journal=[[Historische Zeitschrift]] |volume=231 |issue=H 1 |pages=101–109 |doi=10.1524/hzhz.1980.231.jg.101 |jstor=27621785}}
* {{Cite conference |last=Dingledy |first=Frederick |date=2019-05-02 |title=The Corpus Juris Civilis: A Guide to Its History and Use |doi=10.31228/osf.io/meq6c |journal=Legal Reference Services Quarterly |volume=35 |issue=4 |doi-access=free}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Harper |first=Kyle |date=2010 |title=Slave Prices in Late Antiquity (and in the Very Long Term) |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27809564 |journal=Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte |volume=59 |issue=2 |pages=206–238 |doi=10.25162/historia-2010-0013 |issn=0018-2311 |jstor=27809564 |s2cid=160720781}}
* {{Cite conference |last1=Horn |first1=Fred |title=Foundations of Digital Archæoludology |date=2019-05-31 |arxiv=1905.13516 |access-date=2025-01-10 |last2=Schädler |first2=Ulrich |chapter=3.4 Forensic Game Reconstruction |pages=9–10 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336574703}}
* {{cite journal |last=Ivanič |first=Peter |title=The Origins of Christianity in the Territory of Czech and Slovak Republics Within the Contexts of Written Sources |url=https://www.academia.edu/70908086 |journal=European Journal of Science and Theology |volume=12 |issue=6 |date=2016 |pages=123–130 |access-date=9 June 2023 |archive-date=6 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606030707/https://www.academia.edu/70908086 |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Ivanova |first1=Mirela |last2=Anderson |first2=Benjamin |date=2024-10-01 |title=The Politics of Byzantine Studies: Between Nations and Empires |url=https://academic.oup.com/ehr/article/139/600/1230/7742107 |journal=The English Historical Review |volume=139 |issue=600 |pages=1230–1249 |doi=10.1093/ehr/ceae159 |issn=0013-8266 |doi-access=free}}
* {{cite journal |first=Alexander |last=Jones |title=The Works of Archimedes: Translation and Commentary. Volume 1: The Two Books On the Sphere and the Cylinder |journal=Notices of the AMS |volume=52 |issue=5 |url=https://www.ams.org/notices/200505/rev-jones.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220302190047/https://www.ams.org/notices/200505/rev-jones.pdf |archive-date=2 March 2022 |year=2005 |pages=520–525}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Karras |first=Valerie A. |date=2004 |title=Female Deacons in the Byzantine Church |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4146526 |journal=Church History |volume=73 |issue=2 |pages=272–316 |doi=10.1017/S000964070010928X |jstor=4146526 |s2cid=161817885 |issn=0009-6407 |access-date=2 February 2024 |archive-date=5 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305131943/http://www.jstor.org/stable/4146526 |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander |date=1990a |title=Byzantine Hagiography and Sex in the Fifth to Twelfth Centuries |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1291623 |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=44 |pages=131–143 |doi=10.2307/1291623 |jstor=1291623 |issn=0070-7546 |access-date=30 January 2024 |url-access=subscription}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lavan |first=Myles |date=2016 |title=The Spread of Roman Citizenship, 14–212 ce: Quantification in the Face of High Uncertainty |url=https://academic.oup.com/past/article-abstract/230/1/3/2460651?redirectedFrom=fulltext |journal=Past & Present |issue=230 |pages=3–46 |doi=10.1093/pastj/gtv043 |issn=0031-2746 |hdl=10023/12646 |hdl-access=free |url-access=subscription}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |date=2025-12-18 |title=The Foundation of Constantinople and the Beginnings of Byzantine Studies |url=https://doi.org/10.66292/ebpb.2025.02 |journal=Études byzantines et post-byzantines |volume=7 |pages=23–43 |doi=10.66292/ebpb.2025.02 |issn=0259-0913}}
* {{cite journal |last=Nicholson |first=Graham |title=The Understanding of Papal Supremacy as Revealed in the Letters of Pope Gregory the Great |journal=Theological Studies |volume=11 |year=1960 |pages=25–51 |url=https://www.medievalists.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/Understanding-of-Papal-Supremacy.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107095542/https://www.medievalists.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/Understanding-of-Papal-Supremacy.pdf |archive-date=7 November 2023 |url-status=live}}
*{{cite journal |doi=10.1086/688704 |title=Science and Orthodox Christianity: An Overview |year=2016 |last1=Nicolaidis |first1=Efthymios |last2=Delli |first2=Eudoxie |last3=Livanos |first3=Nikolaos |last4=Tampakis |first4=Kostas |last5=Vlahakis |first5=George |journal=Isis |volume=107 |issue=3 |pages=542–566 |pmid=28707856 |ref={{SfnRef|Nicolaidis et al.|2016}}}}
* {{cite journal |last=Poppe |first=Andrzej |year=1991 |title=Christianity and Ideological change in Kievan Rus': The First Hundred Years |journal=Canadian-American Slavic Studies |volume=25 |issue=1–4 |pages=3–26 |doi=10.1163/221023991X00038}}
* {{Cite journal |title=Review of: Response: Rotman on Lenski on Youval Rotman, Byzantine Slavery and the Mediterranean World |first=Youval |last=Rotman |url=https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2010/2010.07.02 |journal=Bryn Mawr Classical Review |issn=1055-7660 |access-date=9 January 2024 |archive-date=9 January 2024 |date=2010-07-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240109104527/https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2010/2010.07.02 |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Salogubova |first1=Elena |last2=Zenkov |first2=Alan |date=2018-06-15 |title=Roman Law's Influence on Russian Civil Law and Procedure |journal=Russian Law Journal |volume=6 |issue=2 |pages=118–133 |doi=10.17589/2309-8678-2018-6-2-118-133 <!--|doi-broken-date=3 April 2025--> |doi-broken-date=16 August 2025 |issn=2312-3605 |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234045831.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250110105849/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234045831.pdf |archive-date=10 January 2025 |url-status=live}}
{{Refend}}
 
=== Book chapters and encyclopaedias ===
{{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Angold |editor-first=Michael |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2006 |volume=5 |isbn=9781139054089 |editor-link=Michael Angold |location=Cambridge}}
** {{harvc |last=Micheau |first=Françoise |c=Eastern Christianities (Eleventh to Fourteenth Century): Copts, Melkites, Nestorians and Jacobites |year=2006 |in=Angold |pp=371–403}}
** {{harvc |last=Shepard |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Shepard |c=The Byzantine Commonwealth 1000–1550 |in=Angold |year=2006 |pp=1–52}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Invention of Byzantium in Early Modern Europe |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-88402-484-2 |last2=Ransohoff |first2=Jake |last1=Aschenbrenner |first1=Nathanael |location=Washington DC}}
** {{harvc |last2=Ransohoff |first2=Jake |pages=1–23 |c=Introduction |last1=Aschenbrenner |first1=Nathanael |in1=Aschenbrenner |in2=Ransohoff |anchor-year=2022a |year=2022}}
** {{harvc |pages=349–367 |chapter=From "Empire of the Greeks" to "Byzantium" |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Kaldellis |in1=Aschenbrenner |in2=Ransohoff |year=2022 |anchor-year=2022a }}
** {{harvc |last2=Ransohoff |first2=Jake |pages=369–382 |c=Conclusion |last1=Aschenbrenner |first1=Nathanael |in1=Aschenbrenner |in2=Ransohoff |anchor-year=2022b |year=2022}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Browning |first=Robert |editor-last1=Lucas |editor-first1=Donald William |editor-link1=D. W. Lucas |editor-last2=Mackridge |editor-first2=Peter A. |editor-link2=Peter Mackridge |year=2022 |title=Greek Literature: Byzantine Literature |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica |location=Chicago |url=https://www.britannica.com/art/Greek-literature/Byzantine-literature#ref299806}}
* {{cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |author-link=Averil Cameron |date=2002 |chapter=The 'Long' Late Antiquity: A Twentieth-Century Model |title=Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome |editor-last=Wiseman |editor-first=T. P. |editor-link=T. P. Wiseman |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |pages=165–191 |chapter-url=https://www.academia.edu/11134386 |access-date=12 December 2023 |archive-date=9 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240209191020/https://www.academia.edu/11134386 |url-status=live |isbn=9780197263235}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |year=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=2 |editor1-last=Casiday |editor1-first=Augustine |editor2-last=Norris |editor2-first=Frederick W. |isbn=9781139054133 |location=Cambridge}}
** {{harvc |last=Casiday |first=Augustine |last2=Norris |first2=Frederick W. |c=Introduction |year=2007 |in1=Casiday |in2=Norris |anchor-year=2007a |pp=1–5}}
** {{harvc |last=Drake |first=Harold A. |author-link=Harold A. Drake |c=The Church, Society and Political Power |pp=403–428 |in1=Casiday |in2=Norris |year=2007}}
** {{harvc |last=Löhr |first=Winrich |c=Western Christianities |pp=7–51 |in1=Casiday |in2=Norris |year=2007}}
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Cormack |editor-first1=Robin |year=2008 |title=The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies |isbn=978-0-1917-4352-8 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |editor-link=Robin Cormack |url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxford-handbook-of-byzantine-studies-oxford-handbooks-jeffreys-elizabeth-hal/mode/2up |editor-last2=Haldon |editor-first2=John F. |editor-last3=Jeffreys |editor-first3=Elizabeth |editor-link2=John Haldon |editor-link3=Elizabeth Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Brandes |first=Wolfram |c=Revenues and Expenditure |in1=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=562–570 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Bryer |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Bryer |in=Cormack |year=2008 |c=Food, Wine, and Feasting |pages=669–676 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Decker |first=Michael |in=Cormack |year=2008 |c=Everyday Technologies |pages=492–502 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Greatrex |first=Geoffrey |c=Political-Historical Survey, c. 250–518 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=233–248 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Haldon |first=John F. |c=Political-Historical Survey, c. 518–800 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |author-link=John Haldon |anchor-year=2008a |pages=249–263 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Haldon |first=John F. |c=The Army |in=Cormack |year=2008 |author-link=John Haldon |anchor-year=2008b |pages=554–561 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Harvey |first=Alan |c=The Village |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=328–334 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Holmes |first=Catherine |c=Political-Historical Survey, 800–1204 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=264–279 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last1=Horrocks |first1=Geoffrey |c=Language |in1=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=777–784 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Howard-Johnston |first=James F |c=Byzantium and Its Neighbours |in=Cormack |year=2008 |author-link=James Howard-Johnston |pages=939–956 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Jeffreys |first=Elizabeth |in=Cormack |year=2008 |anchor-year=2008a |c=Entertainments, Theatre, And Hippodrome |pages=677–684 |author-link=Elizabeth Jeffreys |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Jeffreys |first=Michael |c=Literacy |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=796–802 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Laiou |first=Angeliki |author-link=Angeliki Laiou |c=Political-Historical Survey, 1204–1453 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=280–294 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Mango |first=Cyril |c=Byzantium's Role in World History |in1=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=957–961 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys |author-link=Cyril Mango}}
** {{harvc |last=Stathakopoulos |first=Dionysios Ch. |c=Population, Demography, and Disease |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=309–316 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Curl |first1=James Stevens |author-link1=James Stevens Curl |last2=Wilson |first2=Susan |year=2021 |encyclopedia=The Oxford Dictionary of Architecture |title=Byzantine Architecture |edition=3rd Edition Revised<!--Distinct from 3rd Edition not revised--> |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-191874-2 |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191918742.001.0001/acref-9780191918742-e-755 |url-access=subscription}}
* {{Cite book |last=Garland |first=Lynda |title=Byzantine Women: Varieties of Experience, 800–1200 |date=2006 |publisher=Ashgate |isbn=978-0-7546-5737-8 |series=Publications for the Centre for Hellenic Studies, King's College, London |location=Aldershot, Burlington}}
** {{harvc |last=Dawson |first=Timothy |c=Propriety, Practicality, Pleasure: The Parameters of Women's Dress in Byzantium, A.D. 1000–1200 |in=Garland |year=2006 |pages=41–76}}
* {{cite book |last=Grosdidier de Matons |first=Jean |year=1967 |chapter=La Femme dans l'Empire Byzantin |trans-chapter=Women in the Byzantine Empire |title=Histoire Mondiale de la Femme: Préhistoire et antiquité |trans-title=World History of Women: Prehistory and Antinquity |volume=I |pages=11–43 |language=fr |location=Paris |publisher=Nouvelle librairie de France |oclc=490034792 |editor-last=Grimal |editor-first=Pierre |editor-link=Pierre Grimal}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haarer |first=F. K. |chapter=Writing Histories of Byzantium: The Historiography of Byzantine History |date=2010 |title=A Companion to Byzantium |pages=9–21 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444320015.ch2 |access-date=2025-01-16 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |doi=10.1002/9781444320015.ch2 |isbn=978-1-4443-2001-5 |location=London |editor-first=Liz |editor-last=James |editor-link=Liz James}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=James |first=Liz |author-link=Liz James |editor-last=Brigstocke |editor-first=Hugh |year=2003 |orig-year=2001 |encyclopedia=The Oxford Companion to Western Art |title=Byzantine Art |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-866203-7 |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662037.001.0001/acref-9780198662037-e-423}}
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Johnson |editor1-first=Scott Fitzgerald |title=The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity |date=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-027753-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KEYSDAAAQBAJ |location=Oxford}}
** {{harvc |last=Kaiser |first=Wolfgang |c=Justinian and the Corpus Iuris Civilis |in=Johnson |year=2015 |pp=119–148}}
** {{harvc |last=Stolte |first=Bernard H. |c=The Law of New Rome: Byzantine Law |in=Johnson |year=2015 |pp=355–373}}
* {{cite web |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=Late Antiquity Dissolves |date=18 September 2015 |website=Marginalia: Forum on Late Antiquity and the Humanities |access-date=12 December 2023 |url=https://themarginaliareview.com/late-antiquity-dissolves-by-anthony-kaldellis/ |archive-date=13 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231213011114/https://themarginaliareview.com/late-antiquity-dissolves-by-anthony-kaldellis/ |url-status=live |author-link=Anthony Kaldellis}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume Two: The History of Empires |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2021a |editor-last=Fibiger Bang |editor-first=Peter |editor1-link=Peter Fibiger Bang |chapter=The Byzantine Empire (641–1453 CE) |pages=450–467 |editor-last2=Bayly |editor-first2=C. A. |editor2-link=Christopher Bayly |editor-last3=Scheidel |editor-first3=Walter |editor3-link=Walter Scheidel |isbn=9780197532768 |location=New York |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |title=Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1991a |isbn=978-0-19-504652-6 |editor-last=Kazhdan |editor-first=Alexander Petrovich |location=Oxford |volume=2 |url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/mode/2up |editor-link=Alexander Kazhdan}}
** {{harvc |last=Browning |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Browning (Byzantinist) |url-access=subscription |in=Kazhdan |year=1991a |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-3001 |c=Language |pages=1175–1177}}
** {{harvc |last=Conomos |first=Dimitri E. |year=1991a |anchor-year=1991 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/page/1419/mode/2up |pages=1424–1426 |c=Music |in=Kazhdan}}
** {{harvc |last1=Conomos |first1=Dimitri E. |last2=Kazhdan |first2=Alexander |year=1991a |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/page/1421/mode/2up |pages=1426–1427 |c=Musical Instruments |in=Kazhdan |anchor-year=1991}}
** {{harvc |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander Petrovich |year=1991a |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/page/1228/mode/2up |pages=1234–1237 |c=Literature |in=Kazhdan |anchor-year=1991b}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Economic History of Byzantium. From the Seventh Through the Fifteenth Century |volume=1 |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |year=2002a |editor-last=Laiou |editor-first=Angeliki E. |location=Washington DC |url=https://archive.org/details/economicbizant/mode/2up |isbn=9780884022886 |editor-link=Angeliki Laiou}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Economic History of Byzantium. From the Seventh Through the Fifteenth Century |volume=2 |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |year=2002b |editor-first=Angeliki E. |editor-last=Laiou |location=Washington DC |isbn=978-0884022886}}
** {{harvc |pages=625–632|c=Medieval Athens |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120218231247/http://www.doaks.org/publications/doaks_online_publications/EconHist/EHB29.pdf |last=Kazanaki-Lappa |first=Maria |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002}}
** {{harvc |last=Laiou |first=Angeliki E. |c=Exchange and Trade, Seventh-Twelfth Centuries |pages=681–754 |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002c |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114425/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb36-trade}}
** {{harvc |pages=519–527 |chapter=Medieval Constantinople: Built Environment and Urban Development |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114407/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb20-cp |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Magdalino |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002b}}
** {{harvc |pages=771–806 |chapter=Commerce, Trade, Markets, and Money: Thirteenth-Fifteenth Centuries |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114138/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb37-trade-late |last=Matschke |first=Klaus-Peter |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002}}
* {{cite book |last=Lazaris |first=Stavros |title=A Companion to Byzantine Science |series=Brill's Companions to the Byzantine World |volume=6 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden |year=2020 |doi=10.1163/9789004414617 |isbn=978-90-04-41461-7}}
** {{harvc |last=Lazaris |first=Stavros |c=Introduction |in=Lazaris |year=2020 |pages=1–26 |anchor-year=2020a}}
** {{harvc |last=Inglebert |first=Herv |c=1. ‘Inner’ and ‘Outer’ Knowledge: the Debate between Faith and Reason in Late Antiquity |in=Lazaris |year=2020 |pages=27–52}}
** {{harvc |last=Manolova |first=Divna |c=2. Science Teaching and Learning Methods in Byzantium |in=Lazaris |year=2020 |pages=53–104}}
** {{harvc |last=Telelis |first=Ioannis |c=5. Meteorology and Physics in Byzantium |in=Lazaris |year=2020 |pages=177–201}}
** {{harvc |last=Salmon |first=Thomas |c=12. The Byzantine Science of Warfare: from Treatises to Battlefield |in=Lazaris |year=2020 |pages=429–463}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lenski |first=Noel |chapter=Slavery in the Byzantine Empire |date=2021-08-12 |title=The Cambridge World History of Slavery |pages=453–481 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-02472-3 |volume=2: AD 500–AD 1420 |location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/9781139024723.019 |editor1-first=Craig |editor1-last=Perry |editor2-last=Eltis |editor2-first=David |editor3-last=Engerman |editor3-first=Stanley L. |editor3-link=Stanley Engerman |editor4-last=Richardson |editor4-first=David}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Levy |first=Kenneth |others=Revised by Christian Troelsgård |editor-first1=Christian |editor-last1=Troelsgård |year=2016 |orig-year=2001 |encyclopedia=[[Grove Music Online]] |title=Byzantine Chant |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.04494 |isbn=978-1-56159-263-0 |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000004494 |ref={{sfnRef|Levy|Troelsgård|2016}} |author-link=Kenneth Levy}} {{Grove Music subscription}}
* {{cite book |title=New Cambridge Medieval History |volume=1: c. 500 – c. 700 |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |date=2005 |chapter=The Byzantine Empire in the Seventh Century |pages=289–316 |isbn=9781139053938 |editor1-last=Fouracre |editor1-first=Paul |editor1-link=Paul Fouracre}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/ocm50270189 |title=The Oxford History of Byzantium |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-814098-6 |editor-last=Mango |editor-first=Cyril A. |location=Oxford |editor-link=Cyril Mango}}
** {{harvc |last1=Jeffreys |first1=Elizabeth |author-link1=Elizabeth Jeffreys |last2=Mango |first2=Cyril |author-link2=Cyril Mango |c=Towards a Franco-Greek Culture |in=Mango |year=2002 |pages=294–305}}
** {{harvc |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |c=The Medieval Empire (780–1204) |in=Mango |year=2002 |author-link=Paul Magdalino |pages=169–213}}
** {{harvc |last=Reinert |first=Stephen W. |c=Fragmentation (1204–1453) |in=Mango |year=2002 |pages=248–283}}
** {{harvc |last=Treadgold |first=Warren |c=The Struggle for Survival (641–780) |in=Mango |year=2002 |author-link=Warren Treadgold |pages=129–152}}
* {{Cite book |editor1-last=Mitchell |editor1-first=Margaret M. |editor1-link=Margaret M. Mitchell |editor2-last=Young |editor2-first=Frances |editor2-link=Frances Young |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |volume=1 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-05483-6 |year=2006 |location=Cambridge}}
** {{harvc |last=Cameron |first=Averil |year=2006 |c=Constantine and the 'Peace of the Church' |anchor-year=2006b |in1=Mitchell |in2=Young |pp=538–551 |author-link=Averil Cameron}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nicol |first=Donald M. |title=The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350–c. 1450 |title-link=The Cambridge History of Political Thought |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1988 |isbn=978-0-52-142388-5 |editor-last=Burns |editor-first=J. H. |pages=51–79 |chapter=Byzantine Political Thought |author-link=Donald Nicol |editor-link=J. H. Burns |location=Cambridge |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jEa8Iv5wJ0IC&pg=PA51}}
* {{Cite book |editor1-last=Noble |editor1-first=Thomas F. X. |editor2-last=Smith |editor2-first=Julia M. H. |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-139-05422-5 |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |volume=3 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |editor2-link=Julia M. H. Smith |location=Cambridge}}
** {{harvc |last=Brown |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Brown (historian) |year=2008 |c=Introduction: Christendom, c. 600 |in1=Noble |in2=Smith |pp=1–18}}
** {{harvc |last=Kolbaba |first=Tia M. |c=Latin and Greek Christians |pp=213–229 |in1=Noble |in2=Smith |year=2008}}
** {{harvc |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |c=The Emergence of Byzantine Orthodoxy, 600–1095 |in1=Noble |in2=Smith |year=2008 |pp=46–64}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nutton |first=Vivian |author-link=Vivian Nutton |chapter=From Galen to Alexander, Aspects of Medicine and Medical Practice in Late Antiquity |pages=1–14 |editor-last=Scarborough |editor-first=John |title=Symposium on Byzantine Medicine |year=1984 |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |series=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=38 |jstor=1291489 |isbn=9780884021391 |url=https://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/series/dopapers/for-readers/past-issues/volume-38 |location=Washington DC |doi=10.2307/1291489 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/DOP38_02_Nutton/mode/2up}}
* {{cite book |last=Papaconstantinou |first=Arietta |title=Conversion in Late Antiquity: Christianity, Islam, and Beyond |year=2016 |publisher=Routledge |chapter=Introduction |pages=xv–xxxvii |isbn=978-1-4094-5738-1 |location=London |author-link=Arietta Papaconstantinou}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Papaioannou |editor-first=Stratis |year=2021 |title=The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Literature |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-19-935176-3}}
** {{harvc |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |year=2021 |chapter=The Reception of Classical Literature and Ancient Myth |in=Papaioannou |pages=162–179 |author-link=Anthony Kaldellis}}
** {{harvc |last=Martín |first=Inmaculada Pérez |year=2021 |chapter=Modes of Manuscript Transmission (Ninth–Fifteenth Centuries) |in=Papaioannou |pages=682–706}}
** {{harvc |last=Papaioannou |first=Stratis |year=2021 |anchor-year=2021a |chapter=What Is Byzantine Literature? An Introduction |in=Papaioannou |pages=1–18}}
* {{Cite book |last=Papademetriou |first=Tom |chapter=The Millet System Revisited |date=2015-02-01 |title=Render unto the Sultan |pages=19–62 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717898.003.0002 |isbn=978-0-19-871789-8}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110598384/html |title=Transformations of Romanness: Early Medieval Regions and Identities |date=2018-06-25 |publisher=De Gruyter |doi=10.1515/9783110598384 |hdl=10278/3702393 |isbn=978-3-11-059838-4 |editor-last=Pohl |editor-first=Walter |editor-last2=Gantner |editor-first2=Clemens |editor-last3=Grifoni |editor-first3=Cinzia |editor-last4=Pollheimer-Mohaupt |editor-first4=Marianne}}
** {{harvc |last1=Pohl |first1=Walter  |c=1 Introduction: Early medieval Romanness – a multiple identity |in=Pohl |in2=Gantner |in3=Grifoni |in4=Pollheimer-Mohaupt |year=2018 |pp=3-39}}
** {{harvc |last1=Stouraitis |first1=Ioannis |c=Byzantine Romanness: From geopolitical to ethnic conceptions|in=Pohl |in2=Gantner |in3=Grifoni |in4=Pollheimer-Mohaupt  |year=2018 |pp=123-39}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rochette |first=Bruno |chapter=The Attitude of the Roman Emperors towards Language Practices |title=Social Factors in the Latinization of the Roman West |year=2023 |location=Oxford |chapter-url=https://academic.oup.com/book/55330/chapter/428805545 |editor1-last=Mullen |editor1-first=Alex |access-date=2023-12-22 |edition=1st |publisher=Oxford University Press |language=en |isbn=978-0-19-888729-4 |author-mask=3 |editor1-link=Alex Mullen (academic) |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/55330}}
* {{Cite book |last=Salaman |first=Rena |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_rbDzAYGcUa8C/page/184 |title=Oxford Symposium on Food & Cookery 1984 & 1985: Cookery: Science, Lore & Books: Proceedings (Introduction by Alan Davidson) |publisher=Prospect Books |date=1986 |isbn=978-0-907325-16-1 |editor-last=Jaine |editor-first=Tom |location=London |pages=[https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_rbDzAYGcUa8C/page/184 184–187] |chapter=The Case of the Missing Fish, or ''Dolmathon'' Prolegomena |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jYa3J6xrjt4C |editor-link=Tom Jaine}}
* {{cite book |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander |chapter=The Notion of Byzantine Diplomacy |editor-last=Shepard |editor-first=Jonathan |year=1990 |title=Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers of the Twenty-fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies |isbn=9780860783381 |publisher=Variorum |location=Cambridge |editor-link=Jonathan Shepard |author-link=Alexander Kazhdan |pages=3–24}}
* {{Cite book |editor-first1=Jonathan |editor-last1=Shepard |date=2009 |title=[[The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire|The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire c. 500–1492]] |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0-5117-5670-2}}
** {{harvc |last=Angold |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Angold |c=Belle Époque or Crisis? (1025–1118) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=583–626}}
** {{harvc |last=Angold |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Angold |c=After the Fourth Crusade: the Greek Rump States and the Recovery of Byzantium |in=Shepard |year=2009 |anchor-year=2009b |pp=731–758}}
** {{harvc |last=Auzépy |first=Marie-France |c=State of Emergency (700–850) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=251–291}}
** {{harvc |last=Bryer |first=Anthony |c=The Roman Orthodox World (1393–1492) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=465–492 |author-link=Anthony Bryer}}
** {{harvc |last=Kaegi |first=Walter Emil |author-link=Walter Kaegi |c=Confronting Islam: Emperors Versus Caliphs (641 – c. 850) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=365–394}}
** {{harvc |last=Laiou |first=Angeliki |c=The Palaiologoi And The World Around Them (1261–1400) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=803–833}}
** {{harvc |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |c=Justinian and his legacy (500–600) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |anchor-year=2009a |pp=97–129}}
** {{harvc |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |c=Byzantium Transforming (600–700) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=221–248 |anchor-year=2009b}}
** {{harvc |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Magdalino |c=The Empire of the Komnenoi (1118–1204) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=627–663}}
** {{harvc |last=Moorhead |first=John |author-link=John Moorhead |c=Western Approaches (500–600) |in=Shepard |year=2009}}
** {{harvc |last=Shepard |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Shepard |c=Equilibrium to Expansion (886–1025) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |anchor-year=2009b |pp=493–536}}
** {{harvc |last=Tougher |first=Shaun |c=After Iconoclasm (850–886) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=292–304}}
** {{harvc |last=Whittow |first=Mark |c=The Middle Byzantine Economy (600–1204) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=465–492 |author-link=Mark Whittow}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Routledge Handbook on Identity in Byzantium |date=2022 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-367-14341-1 |editor-last=Stewart |editor-first=Michael Edward |series=The Routledge History Handbooks |location=New York |editor-last2=Parnell |editor-first2=David Alan |editor-last3=Whately |editor-first3=Conor}}
** {{harvc |last=Stewart |first=Michael |c=Finding Byzantium |in1=Stewart |in2=Parnell |in3=Whately |year=2022 |pp=1–15}}
** {{harvc |last1=Muthesius |first1=Anna |c=Imperial identity: Byzantine silks, art, autocracy, theocracy, and the image of the Basileia|in1=Stewart| in2=Parnell |in3=Whately |year=2022 |pp=81-103}}
** {{harvc |last1=Kaldellis |first1=Anthony |c=Provincial identities in Byzantium|in1=Stewart| in2=Parnell |in3=Whately |year=2022 |anchor-year=2022b |pp=248-261}}
** {{harvc |last=Goldwyn |first=Adam J. |c=Byzantium in the American Alt-Right Imagination: Paradigms of the Medieval Greek Past Among Men's Rights Activists and White Supremacists |year=2022 |pp=424–436 |in1=Stewart| in2=Parnell |in3=Whately}}
* {{Cite book |last=Stolte |first=Bernard |url=https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27972/chapter/211607076 |chapter=Byzantine Law: The Law of the New Rome |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor-last=Pihlajamäki |editor-first=Heikki |volume=1 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198785521.013.10 |editor-last2=Dubber |editor-first2=Markus D. |editor-last3=Godfrey |editor-first3=Mark |pages=230–249 |location=Oxford |title=The Oxford Handbook of European Legal History |isbn=9780191827426}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://academic.oup.com/edinburgh-scholarship-online/book/51597 |title=Identities and Ideologies in the Medieval East Roman World |date=2022-10-31 |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |isbn=978-1-4744-9362-8 |editor-last=Stouraitis |editor-first=Yannis |edition=1 |language=en |doi=10.3366/edinburgh/9781474493628.001.0001}}
** {{harvc |last=Stouraitis |first=Yannis |c=1 Is Byzantinism an Orientalism? Reflections on Byzantium's Constructed Identities and Debated Ideologies |in1=Stouraitis |year=2022 |anchor-year=2022b |pp=19-47}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Byzantines |date=1997 |last=Talbot |first=Alice-Mary |author-link=Alice-Mary Talbot |chapter=Chapter 5: Women |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-09791-6 |editor-last=Cavallo |editor-first=Guglielmo |editor1-link=Guglielmo Cavallo |location=Chicago |pages=117–143}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Touliatos |first=Diane |year=2001 |encyclopedia=[[Grove Music Online]] |title=Byzantine Secular Music |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.48192 |isbn=978-1-56159-263-0 |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000048192}} {{Grove Music subscription}}
* {{cite book |last=Velimirović |first=Miloš |author-link=Miloš Velimirović |editor-first1=Richard |editor-last1=Crocker |editor-first2=David |editor-last2=Hiley |editor-link2=David Hiley |year=1990 |title=The New Oxford History of Music |volume=II: The Early Middle Ages To 1300 |chapter=Byzantine Chant |pages=26–68 |edition=2nd |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-316329-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/new-oxford-history-of-music/New%20Oxford%20History%20of%20Music%202a%20The%20Early%20Middle%20Ages%20to%201300%20II/mode/2up}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wildberg |first=Christian |author-link=Christian Wildberg |chapter-url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/philoponus/ |title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=2018 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |editor-link=Edward N. Zalta |access-date=8 February 2025 |chapter=John Philoponus |edition=Winter 2021}}
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}


== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
{{Refbegin|40em}}
{{Library resources box |onlinebooks = yes}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Ahrweiler |first1=Hélène |title=Les Européens |last2=Aymard |first2=Maurice |publisher=Hermann |date=2000 |isbn=978-2-7056-6409-1 |location=Paris}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ball |first=Jennifer |date=2005 |title=Byzantine Dress: Representations of Secular Dress in Eighth- to Twelfth-Century Painting |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cksBDgAAQBAJ |edition=1st |series=The New Middle Ages |location=New York |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-4039-6700-8}}
* {{Cite book |last=Angelov |first=Dimiter |title=Imperial Ideology and Political Thought in Byzantium (1204–1330) |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-85703-1 |location=Cambridge, United Kingdom}}
* {{harvc |last=Sarris |first=Peter |c=The Eastern Roman Empire from Constantine to Heraclius (306–641) |in=Mango |year=2002 |pages=19–70}}
* Baboula, Evanthia, Byzantium, in ''Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God'' (2 vols.), Edited by C. Fitzpatrick and A. Walker, Santa Barbara, ABC-CLIO, 2014. {{ISBN|978-1-61069-177-2}}.
* {{Cite book |last1=Evans, Helen C. |url=https://archive.org/details/gloryofbyzantium00evan |title=The glory of Byzantium: art and culture of the Middle Byzantine era, A.D. 843–1261 |last2=Wixom, William D |publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |date=1997 |isbn=978-0-8109-6507-2 |location=New York |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |title=Byzantine Matters |publisher=Princeton University Press |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-4008-5009-9 |location=Princeton, NJ}}
* {{Citation |last=Duval |first=Ben |title=Midway Through the Plunge: John Cantacuzenus and the Fall of Byzantium |date=2019 |publisher=Byzantine Emporia, LLC}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haldon |first=John |title=The Byzantine Wars: Battles and Campaigns of the Byzantine Era |publisher=Tempus Publishing |date=2001 |isbn=978-0-7524-1795-0 |location=Stroud, Gloucestershire}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haldon |first=John |title=Byzantium: A History |publisher=Tempus Publishing |date=2002 |isbn=978-1-4051-3240-4 |location=Stroud, Gloucestershire}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haldon |first=John |title=The Empire That Would Not Die: The Paradox of Eastern Roman Survival, 640–740 |publisher=Harvard University |date=2016 |isbn=978-0-674-08877-1}}
* {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Jonathan |title=Constantinople: Capital of Byzantium |date= 2017 |publisher=Bloomsbury|edition=2nd |isbn=978-1-4742-5465-6}} [https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53285 online review] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210530215203/https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53285 |date=30 May 2021 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Jonathan |title=The Lost World of Byzantium |publisher=Yale University Press |date=2015 |isbn=978-0-300-17857-9 |location=New Haven CT and London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Jonathan |title=Introduction to Byzantium, 602–1453 |publisher=Routledge |date=2020 |isbn=978-1-138-55643-0 |edition=1st}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hussey |first=J.M. |title=The Cambridge Medieval History. Vol.&nbsp;IV: The Byzantine Empire |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1966 |location=Cambridge}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D-LLEAAAQBAJ |title=The New Roman Empire: A History of Byzantium |date=2024 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-754932-2 |language=en}}
* [https://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/viewFile/10651/4317 Moles Ian N., "Nationalism and Byzantine Greece", ''Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies'', Duke University, pp. 95–107, 1969] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220408052042/https://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/viewFile/10651/4317 |date=8 April 2022 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Runciman |first=Steven |title=Byzantine Civilisation |publisher=[[Edward Arnold (publisher)|Edward Arnold]] Limited |date=1966 |isbn=978-1-56619-574-4 |location=London |author-link=Steven Runciman}}
* {{Cite book |last=Runciman |first=Steven |title=The Emperor Romanus Lecapenus and his Reign |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-06164-3 |location=Cambridge |ref=none |orig-date=1929}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=avTADAAAQBAJ |title=The Balkans and the Byzantine World before and after the Captures of Constantinople, 1204 and 1453 |publisher=Lexington Books |date=2016 |isbn=978-1-4985-1326-5 |editor-last=Stanković |editor-first=Vlada |location=Lanham, Maryland |access-date=11 January 2018 |archive-date=28 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200128110336/https://books.google.com/books?id=avTADAAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Stathakopoulos |first=Dionysios |title=A Short History of the Byzantine Empire |publisher=I.B. Tauris |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-78076-194-7 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Thomas |first=John P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jCAl9udu8IwC |title=Private Religious Foundations in the Byzantine Empire |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-88402-164-3 |location=Washington, DC |access-date=27 September 2020 |archive-date=16 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116221235/https://books.google.com/books?id=jCAl9udu8IwC |url-status=live }}
* {{Cite book |last=Treadgold |first=Warren T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nYbnr5XVbzUC |title=A History of the Byzantine State and Society |date=1997 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-2630-6 |language=en}}
* {{Cite book |last=Toynbee |first=Arnold Joseph |title=Constantine Porphyrogenitus and His World |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1972 |isbn=978-0-19-215253-4 |location=Oxford}}
{{Refend}}


== External links ==
== External links ==
{{Library resources box |onlinebooks = yes }}
* {{In Our Time|Byzantine Empire|p00547j9|Byzantine_Empire}}
* {{In Our Time|Byzantine Empire|p00547j9|Byzantine_Empire}}
* [http://www.roman-emperors.org/ De Imperatoribus Romanis]. Scholarly biographies of many Byzantine emperors.
* [http://www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/ 12 Byzantine Rulers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160718092221/http://www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/ |date=18 July 2016}} by Lars Brownworth of [[The Stony Brook School]]; audio lectures.
* [http://www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/ 12 Byzantine Rulers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160718092221/http://www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/ |date=18 July 2016 }} by Lars Brownworth of [[The Stony Brook School]]; audio lectures. [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/education/31education.html NYTimes review].
* [http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~s285238/Roman/RomanEmpire.html 18 centuries of Roman Empire by Howard Wiseman] (Maps of the Roman/Byzantine Empire throughout its lifetime).
* [http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~s285238/Roman/RomanEmpire.html 18 centuries of Roman Empire by Howard Wiseman] (Maps of the Roman/Byzantine Empire throughout its lifetime).
* [http://www.byzantinemuseum.gr/en/ Byzantine & Christian Museum]
; Byzantine studies, resources and bibliography
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080410123427/http://www.doaks.org/Byzantine.html Byzantine studies homepage] at [[Dumbarton Oaks]]. Includes links to numerous electronic texts.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080410123427/http://www.doaks.org/Byzantine.html Byzantine studies homepage] at [[Dumbarton Oaks]]. Includes links to numerous electronic texts.
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/byzantium/ Byzantium: Byzantine studies on the Internet]. Links to various online resources.
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/byzantium/ Byzantium: Byzantine studies on the Internet]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008060507/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/byzantium/ |date=8 October 2014}}. Links to various online resources.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20111107172532/http://homepage.mac.com/paulstephenson/trans.html Translations from Byzantine Sources: The Imperial Centuries, c. 700–1204]. Online sourcebook.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20111107172532/http://homepage.mac.com/paulstephenson/trans.html Translations from Byzantine Sources: The Imperial Centuries, c. 700–1204]. Online sourcebook.
* [http://www.deremilitari.org/ De Re Militari]. Resources for medieval history, including numerous translated sources on the Byzantine wars.
* [http://www.deremilitari.org/ De Re Militari]. Resources for medieval history, including numerous translated sources on the Byzantine wars.
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/sbook1c.html Medieval Sourcebook: Byzantium]. Numerous primary sources on Byzantine history.
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/sbook1c.html Medieval Sourcebook: Byzantium], hosted by [[Fordham University]]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140814170022/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/sbook1c.html |date=14 August 2014}}. Numerous primary sources on Byzantine history.
* [http://www.univie.ac.at/byzantine/ Bibliography on Byzantine Material Culture and Daily Life]. Hosted by the [[University of Vienna]]; in English.
* [http://www.univie.ac.at/byzantine/ Bibliography on Byzantine Material Culture and Daily Life]. Hosted by the [[University of Vienna]]; in English.
* [http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/greek-resources-constantinople.asp Constantinople Home Page]. Links to texts, images and videos on Byzantium.
* [http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/greek-resources-constantinople.asp Constantinople Home Page]. Links to texts, images and videos on Byzantium.
Line 948: Line 637:
* [http://www.oeaw.ac.at/byzanz/ Institute for Byzantine Studies of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (with further resources and a repository with papers on various aspects of the Byzantine Empire)]
* [http://www.oeaw.ac.at/byzanz/ Institute for Byzantine Studies of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (with further resources and a repository with papers on various aspects of the Byzantine Empire)]


{{Clear}}
{{Byzantine Empire topics |state = collapsed}}
{{Byzantine Empire topics |state = collapsed }}
{{Navboxes
{{Navboxes
|list =
| list =
{{Empires}}
{{Empires}}
{{History of Turkey timeline}}
{{History of Turkey timeline}}
Line 960: Line 648:
}}
}}
{{Subject bar
{{Subject bar
|portal1 = Ancient Rome
| portal1 = Ancient Rome
|portal2 = Byzantine Empire
| portal2 = Byzantine Empire
|portal3 = Christianity
| portal3 = Christianity
|portal4 = Greece
| portal4 = Greece
|portal5 = Middle Ages
| portal5 = Middle Ages
|commons = y
| commons = y
|s = y
| s = y
|wikt = y
| wikt = y
|wikt-search = Byzantine
| wikt-search = Byzantine
|voy = y
| voy = y
}}
}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Byzantine Empire| ]]
[[Category:Byzantine Empire| ]]
[[Category:286 establishments]]
[[Category:1453 disestablishments in Asia]]
[[Category:1453 disestablishments in Europe]]
[[Category:330s establishments]]
[[Category:330s establishments]]
[[Category:1453 disestablishments in Europe]]
[[Category:1453 disestablishments in Asia]]
[[Category:Christendom]]
[[Category:Christendom]]
[[Category:States and territories established in the 390s]]
[[Category:Former Christian states]]
[[Category:States and territories disestablished in 1453]]
[[Category:Christian states]]
[[Category:Former countries in Africa]]
[[Category:Former countries in Africa]]
[[Category:Former countries in Europe]]
[[Category:Former countries in the Balkans]]
[[Category:Former countries in the Balkans]]
[[Category:Former countries in Europe]]
[[Category:Former countries in the Middle East]]
[[Category:Former countries in West Asia]]
[[Category:Former countries in West Asia]]
[[Category:Former empires]]
[[Category:Former transcontinental empires]]
[[Category:States and territories disestablished in 1453]]
[[Category:States and territories established in the 390s]]
[[Category:Tributary states of the Ottoman Empire]]
[[Category:Tributary states of the Ottoman Empire]]
[[Category:Historical transcontinental empires]]
[[Category:Former empires]]

Latest revision as of 23:14, 26 March 2026



Byzantine Empire
330–1453
The empire in 555 under Justinian I, its greatest extent since the fall of the Western Roman Empire, vassals shaded in pink
The empire in 555 under Justinian I, its greatest extent since the fall of the Western Roman Empire, vassals shaded in pink
CapitalConstantinople
Common languagesGreek
Religion
Christianity (official)
GovernmentAbsolute monarchy
Notable emperors 
• 306–337
Constantine I
• 379–395
Theodosius I
• 408–450
Theodosius II
• 527–565
Justinian I
• 610–641
Heraclius
• 717–741
Leo III
• 963–969
Nikephoros II
• 969–976
John I
• 976–1025
Basil II
• 1081–1118
Alexios I
• 1118–1143
John II
• 1143–1180
Manuel I
• 1261–1282
Michael VIII
• 1449–1453
Constantine XI
Historical eraLate antiquity to Template:Nwr
Area
4572,350,000 km2 (910,000 sq mi)
5653,400,000 km2 (1,300,000 sq mi)
775880,000 km2 (340,000 sq mi)
10251,675,000 km2 (647,000 sq mi)
Population
• 457[1]
16,000,000
• 565[2]
20,000,000
• 775[3]
7,000,000
• 1025[4]
12,000,000
• 1320[3]
2,000,000
CurrencySolidus, follis, and hyperpyron

The Byzantine Empire, also known as the Eastern Roman Empire, was the continuation of the Roman Empire centred on Constantinople during late antiquity and the Middle Ages. Having survived the events that caused the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century AD, it endured until the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in 1453. The term 'Byzantine Empire' was coined only after its demise; its citizens used the term 'Roman Empire' and called themselves 'Romans'.[lower-alpha 1]

During the early centuries of the Roman Empire, the western provinces were Latinised, but the eastern parts kept their Hellenistic culture. Constantine I (r. 324–337) legalised Christianity and moved the capital to Constantinople. Theodosius I (r. 379–395) made Christianity the state religion and Greek gradually replaced Latin for official use. The empire adopted a defensive strategy and, throughout its remaining history, experienced recurring cycles of decline and recovery.

The Byzantine Empire reached its greatest extent under the reign of Justinian I (r. 527–565), who briefly reconquered much of Italy and the western Mediterranean coast. A plague began around 541, and a prolonged warfare with Persia placed fiscal and military strain on the empire, contributing to political and strategic challenges in the decades that followed. In the 630s and 640s the Arab conquests defeated Byzantine field armies in Syria and Egypt, resulting in the permanent loss of those provinces to the Rashidun Caliphate. In 698, Africa was lost to the Umayyad Caliphate, but the empire stabilised under the Isaurian dynasty. It expanded once more under the Macedonian dynasty, experiencing a two-century-long renaissance. Thereafter, periods of civil war and Seljuk incursion resulted in the loss of most of Asia Minor. The empire recovered during the Komnenian restoration, and Constantinople remained the largest and wealthiest city in Europe until the 13th century.

The empire was largely dismantled in 1204, following the sack of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade; its former territories were then divided into competing Greek rump states and Latin realms. Despite the eventual recovery of Constantinople in 1261, the reconstituted empire wielded only regional power during its final two centuries. Its remaining territories were progressively annexed by the Ottomans in a series of wars fought in the 14th and 15th centuries. The fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453 brought the empire to an end.

Nomenclature[edit | edit source]

The empire's inhabitants, generally known as Byzantines, regarded themselves as Romans (in Greek, Ῥωμαῖοι or Romaioi).[6] Similarly, their Islamic contemporaries called their empire the "land of the Romans" (Bilād al-Rūm).[7] After 800 AD, Western Europe called them "Greeks" (Graeci), as the Papacy and medieval German emperors regarded themselves as the true inheritors of Roman identity.[8] The adjective "Byzantine", derived from Byzantion (Byzantium in Latin), the name of the Greek settlement Constantinople was established on, was only used to describe the inhabitants of the city; it did not refer to the empire, called Rhomanía (Ῥωμανία or "Romanland") by its citizens.[9]

Following the empire's fall, early modern scholars referred to it by many names, including the "Eastern Empire", the "Low Empire", the "Late Empire", the "Empire of the Greeks", "Empire of Constantinople", and "Roman Empire".[10] The increasing use of "Byzantine" and "Byzantine Empire" may have started with Theodore Metochites[11] or Laonikos Chalkokondyles whose work was widely propagated by Hieronymus Wolf.[12] "Byzantine" was used adjectivally alongside terms such as "Empire of the Greeks" until the 19th century.[13] It is now the primary term, used to refer to all aspects of the empire; a minority of modern historians believe it should not be used because it was originally a prejudicial and inaccurate term.[14]

History[edit | edit source]

Start date[edit | edit source]

Given the significant overlap in historiographical periodisations of "Late Roman history", "late antiquity", and "Byzantine history", there is no consensus on a foundation date for the Byzantine Empire. Scholarship with links to Greece or Eastern Orthodoxy has customarily placed it in the early 300s.[15] The growth of the study of "late antiquity" has led to some historians setting a start date in the seventh or eighth centuries.[16] Others believe a "new empire" began during changes c. 300 AD.[17] Geoffrey Greatrex believes that it is impossible to precisely date the foundation of the Byzantine Empire.[18]

Pre-518: Constantinian, Theodosian, and Leonid dynasties[edit | edit source]

A map showing the division of the Roman empire c. 300
Four-way division of the Roman Empire under the Tetrarchy system established by Diocletian

Between the 3rd and 1st centuries BC, the Roman Republic established hegemony over the eastern Mediterranean, while its government developed into the one-person rule of an emperor.[19] The Roman Empire enjoyed a period of relative stability until the 3rd century AD, when external threats and internal crises caused it to splinter, as regional armies acclaimed their generals as "soldier-emperors".[20] One of these, Diocletian (r. 284–305), recognised that the state was too big to be ruled by a single person.[19] He instituted the Tetrarchy, a system which divided the empire into eastern and western halves.[21] The Tetrarchy quickly failed, but the division of the empire proved an enduring concept.[22]

Constantine I (r. 306–337) secured absolute power in 324.[23] Over the next six years, he rebuilt the city of Byzantium as a new capital that he called "New Rome" (later named Constantinople).[24] The old capital Rome was farther from the prosperous eastern provinces and in a less strategically important location; it was not esteemed by the "soldier-emperors", who ruled from the frontiers, or by the empire's population.[25] Having been granted citizenship, they considered themselves just as Roman as those in the city of Rome.[26] He continued reforms of the empire's military and civil administration and instituted the gold solidus as a stable currency.[27] He favoured Christianity and became an opponent of paganism.[28] Constantine's dynasty prioritised a lengthy conflict against the comparably powerful Sasanid Persia and ended in 363 with the death of his nephew Julian.[29] The reign of the short Valentinianic dynasty, marked by wars against the Goths, religious debates, and anti-corruption campaigns, ended in the East with the death of Valens at the Battle of Adrianople in 378.[30]

A map showing the Western and Eastern Roman empires c. 395, divided in the Balkans and North Africa
Division of the empire after the death of Theodosius I in 395
  The Western Roman Empire
  The Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire

Valens's successor, Theodosius I (r. 379–395), secured peace in the east by allowing the Goths to settle in Roman territory;[31] he also twice intervened in the western half, defeating the usurpers Magnus Maximus and Eugenius in 388 and 394, respectively.[32] He actively condemned paganism, confirmed the primacy of Nicene Orthodoxy over Arianism in the East, and established Christianity as the Roman state religion.[33] He was the last emperor to rule both the western and eastern halves of the empire.[34] After his death, the West was destabilised but the East thrived due to the civilian administrators who continued to hold power.[35] Theodosius II (r. 408–450) largely left the rule of the East to officials such as Anthemius, who constructed the Theodosian Walls.[36] Constantinople had now entrenched itself as the empire's capital.[37]

Aside from Constantinople's walls, Theodosius' reign was also marked by the compilation of the Codex Theodosianus[38] and the theological dispute over Nestorianism (a doctrine later deemed heretical).[39] His reign also saw the arrival of Attila's Huns, who ravaged the Balkans, leading to a large tribute being exacted from the eastern empire.[40] Attila switched his attention to the rapidly-deteriorating western empire,[41] and his people fractured after his death in 453.[42] Later, Leo I (r. 457–474) failed in his 468 attempt to reconquer the West.[43] The warlord Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustulus in 476 and after the assassination of his titular successor Julius Nepos in 480, abolished the office of western emperor.[44]

Through a combination of fortune and good political decisions, the Eastern Empire never experienced rebellious barbarian vassals or rule by barbarian warlords—the problems which ensured the downfall of the West.[45] Zeno (r. 474–491) convinced the problematic Ostrogoth king Theodoric to take control of Italy from Odoacer;[46] dying when the empire was at peace, he was succeeded by Anastasius I (r. 491–518).[47] His belief in monophysitism brought occasional issues, but Anastasius was a capable administrator and instituted successful financial reforms including the abolition of the chrysargyron tax.[48] He was the first emperor since Diocletian not to face any serious problems affecting the empire during his reign.[49]

518–717: Justinian and Heraclian dynasties[edit | edit source]

A close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden coloured background. The person has a dark brown cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, three jewels on his right shoulder, a crown with two pendants each hanging from both ends and an aura like circle around his head
A close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden coloured background. The person has a white cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, an embroidered pattern on his right shoulder, wavy hair, a stubble beard and a moustache
Emperor Justinian I (left) and his general Belisarius (right). Mosaics, 6th century, from the Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna, Italy

The reign of Justinian I was a high point in east Roman history.[50] Following his accession in 527, the legal code was rewritten as the Corpus Juris Civilis, which streamlined Roman law across the empire;[51] he reasserted imperial control over religion and morality through purges of pagans, heretics, and other "deviants";[52] and having ruthlessly subdued the 532 Nika revolt he rebuilt much of Constantinople, including the Hagia Sophia.[53] Justinian I took advantage of the confusion, following Theoderic the Ostrogoth's death, to attempt the reconquest of Italy.[54] The Vandal Kingdom in North Africa was subjugated in late 533 by the general Belisarius,[55] who then invaded Italy; the Ostrogothic Kingdom mostly ended in 554.[56]

In the 540s, Justinian began to suffer reversals on multiple fronts.[57] Capitalising on Constantinople's preoccupation with the West, Khosrow I of the Sasanian Empire invaded Byzantine territory and sacked Antioch in 540.[58] A devastating plague killed a large proportion of the population and severely reduced the empire's social and financial stability.[59] The most difficult period of the Ostrogothic war, against their king Totila, came during this decade;[60] while divisions among Justinian's advisors undercut the administration's response.[61] He also did not fully heal the divisions in Chalcedonian Christianity, as the fifth ecumenical council failed to make a real difference.[62] Justinian died in 565; his reign was more successful than any other emperor, yet he left behind an unstable empire.[63]

Justin II (r. 565–578) inherited an empire stretched thin both financially and territorially.[64] He was soon at war on many fronts.[65] Fearing the aggressive Avars, the Lombards conquered much of northern Italy by 572.[66] The Sasanian wars restarted in the same year, and would not conclude until 591;[64] by this time, the Avars and Slavs had repeatedly invaded the Balkans, causing great instability.[67] Maurice campaigned extensively in the region during the 590s, and although he re-established Byzantine control up to the Danube, he pushed his troops too far in 602—they mutinied, proclaimed an officer named Phocas as emperor, and executed Maurice.[68] The Sasanians seized their moment and reopened hostilities;[69] Phocas was unable to cope and soon faced a major rebellion led by Heraclius.[70] Phocas lost Constantinople in 610 and was executed;[71] this destructive civil war accelerated the empire's decline.[72]

A photograph of a large double-layered fortification.
The Theodosian Walls of Constantinople, very important during the 717–718 siege

Under Khosrow II, the Sassanids occupied the Levant and Egypt and advanced into Asia Minor, and the Avars and Slavs raided in the Balkans.[73] The Empire's control of Italy also weakened.[74] After successfully repelling a siege of Constantinople in 626,[75] Heraclius won a decisive victory at the Battle of Nineveh,[76] eventually defeating the Sassanids later that year.[77] The triumph would prove short-lived.[78] The Arab conquests soon saw the conquest of the Levant, Egypt, and the Sassanid Empire by the newly formed Arab Rashidun Caliphate.[79] By Heraclius' death in 641, the empire had been severely reduced economically and territorially—the loss of the wealthy eastern provinces had deprived the empire of as much as three-quarters of its revenue.[80]

The next century is poorly documented.[81] Arab raids into Asia Minor started quickly, and the Empire responded by holding fortified centres and avoiding battle wherever possible.[82] Although Anatolia was invaded annually, it avoided permanent Arab occupation.[81] The outbreak of the First Fitna in 656 gave the Empire breathing space, which it used sensibly:[83] some order was restored in the Balkans by Constans II (r. 641–668)[84] following his administrative reorganisation which over time evolved into the "theme system", a structure that allocated troops to defend specific provinces.[85] Constantine IV (r. 668–685) repelled the Arab efforts to capture Constantinople in the 670s using Greek fire,[86] but suffered a reversal against the Bulgars, who soon established an empire in the northern Balkans.[87] Nevertheless, he had done enough to secure the empire's position,[88] especially as the Umayyad Caliphate was undergoing another civil war.[89]

Beginning in 695, when Constantine's son Justinian II was first deposed, the empire entered an era of political instability that lasted for the next 22 years.[90] While Justinian had stabilised the situation with the divided Arabs,[91] the threat of the reconstituted caliphate was met by Leo III when he repelled the 717–718 siege, the first serious challenge against Arab expansion.[92]

718–867: Isaurian, Nikephorian, and Amorian dynasties[edit | edit source]

Two gold coins, each depicting a man
Gold solidus of Leo III (left) and his son and heir, Constantine V (right)

The emperors Leo III (r. 717–741) and Constantine V (r. 741–775) were very effective leaders, both in government and warfare.[93] They withstood continued Arab attacks,[94] as well as civil war and natural disasters.[95] Constantine's success reestablished the state as a major regional power.[96] Leo's reign produced the Ecloga, a code of law that evolved that of Justinian I.[97] He also continued to reform the theme system in order to lead offensive campaigns against the Muslims,[98] culminating in a notable victory in 740.[99] Constantine overcame an early civil war against his brother-in-law Artabasdos, created stability against the new Abbasid Caliphate, campaigned successfully against the Bulgars, and continued to make administrative and military reforms.[100] Due to both emperors' support for the Byzantine Iconoclasm, where the use of religious icons was banned, they were later vilified by biased authors, creating issues that continue to impact modern scholarship;[101] Constantine's reign also saw the loss of Ravenna to the Lombards, and the beginning of a split from the Roman papacy.[102]

In 780, Empress Irene assumed power as regent for her son Constantine VI.[103] Although she was a capable administrator who temporarily resolved the iconoclasm controversy,[104] the empire was destabilised by her conflict with her son. The Bulgars and Abbasids inflicted numerous defeats on the Byzantine armies, and the papacy crowned Charlemagne as Roman emperor in 800.[105] In 802, the unpopular Irene was overthrown by Nikephoros I; he reformed the empire's administration but died in battle against the Bulgars in 811.[106] Military defeats and societal disorder, especially the resurgence of iconoclasm, characterised the next eighteen years.[107]

Map centred on Western Europe. The territories of the Byzantine Empire are shaded dark green; namely the Italian islands, southern Greece, south-central Bulgaria, southern Crimea and most of Turkey.
The Byzantine Empire c. 814

Stability was somewhat restored during the reign of Theophilos (r. 829–842). He capitalised on economic growth to complete construction programmes, including rebuilding the sea walls of Constantinople, overhaul provincial governance, and wage inconclusive campaigns against the Abbasids.[108] After his death, his empress Theodora, ruling on behalf of her son Michael III, permanently extinguished the iconoclastic movement;[109] the empire prospered under their sometimes-fraught rule. Michael was posthumously vilified by historians loyal to the dynasty of his successor Basil I, who had him assassinated in 867 and was credited with his predecessor's achievements.[110]

867–1081: Macedonian and Doukas dynasties[edit | edit source]

Basil I (r. 867–886) continued Michael's policies.[111] His armies campaigned with mixed results in Italy but defeated the Paulicians of Tephrike.[112] His successor Leo VI (r. 886–912)[lower-alpha 2] compiled and propagated a huge number of written works. These included the Basilika, a Greek translation of Justinian I's legal code incorporating over 100 new laws created by Leo; the Tactica, a military treatise; and the Book of the Eparch, a manual on Constantinople's trading regulations.[114] In non-literary contexts Leo was less successful: the empire lost in Sicily and against the Bulgarians,[115] and he provoked theological scandal by marrying four times in an attempt to father a legitimate heir.[116]

The early reign of this heir, Constantine VII, was tumultuous, as his mother Zoe, his uncle Alexander, the patriarch Nicholas, the powerful Simeon I of Bulgaria, and other influential figures jockeyed for power.[117] In 920, the admiral Romanos I used his fleet to secure power, crowning himself and demoting Constantine to the position of junior co-emperor.[118] His reign, marked by the end of the war against Bulgaria and successes in the east under the general John Kourkouas, ended in 944 due to the machinations of his sons, whom Constantine then usurped.[119] Constantine's ineffectual sole rule has often been construed as the zenith of Byzantine learning, but the works compiled were largely intended to legitimise and glorify the emperor's Macedonian dynasty.[120] His son and successor died young; under two soldier-emperors, Nikephoros II (r. 963–969) and John I Tzimiskes (r. 969–976), the army claimed numerous military successes, including the conquest of Cilicia and Antioch, and a victory against Bulgaria and the Kievan Rus' in 971. John in particular was an astute administrator who reformed military structures and implemented effective fiscal policies.[121]

After John's death, Constantine VII's grandsons Basil II and Constantine VIII ruled jointly for half a century, although the latter exercised no real power.[122] Their early reign was occupied by conflicts against two prominent generals, Bardas Skleros and Bardas Phokas, which ended in 989 after the former's death and the latter's submission, and a power struggle against the eunuch Basileios, who was dismissed in 985.[123] Basil, who never married or had children, subsequently refused to delegate any authority: he sidelined the military establishment by taking personal command of the army and promoting officers loyal to him.[124] His reign witnessed the decades-long campaign against Bulgaria, which ended in total Byzantine victory at the Battle of Kleidion in 1014.[125] Diplomatic efforts, critical for this success,[126] also contributed to the annexation of several Georgian provinces in the 1020s and coexistence with the new Fatimid Caliphate.[127] When he died in 1025, Basil's empire stretched from the Danube and Sicily in the west to the Euphrates in the east; his swift expansion was unaccompanied by administrative reforms.[128]

Depiction of an army attacking a walled town
The seizure of Edessa (1031) by the Byzantines under George Maniakes and the counterattack by the Seljuk Turks

After Constantine VIII's death in 1028, his daughters, the empresses Zoe (r. 1028–1050) and Theodora (r. 1042–1056), held the keys to power: four emperors (Romanos III, Michael IV, Michael V, and Constantine IX) ruled only because of their connection to Zoe, while Michael VI (r. 1056–1057) was selected by Theodora.[129] This political instability, regular budget deficits, a series of expensive military failures, and other problems connected to over-extension led to substantial issues in the empire;[130] its strategic focus moved from maintaining its hegemony to prioritising defence.[131]

The empire soon came under sustained assault on three fronts, from the Seljuk Turks in the east, the Pecheneg nomads in the north, and the Normans in the west. The Byzantine army struggled to confront these enemies, who did not organise themselves as traditional states, and were thus untroubled by defeats in set-piece battles.[132] In 1071 Bari, the last remaining Byzantine settlement in Italy, was captured by the Normans, while the Seljuks won a decisive victory at the Battle of Manzikert, taking the emperor Romanos IV Diogenes prisoner.[133] The latter event sparked a decade-long civil war, and as a result the Seljuks took possession of Anatolia up to the Sea of Marmara.[134]

1081–1204: Komnenos and Angelos dynasties[edit | edit source]

One prominent general, Alexios I, usurped the throne in 1081. In contrast to the prior turmoil, the three reigns of Alexios (r. 1081–1118), his son John II (r. 1118–1143), and his grandson Manuel I (r. 1143–1180) lasted a century and restored the empire's regional authority for the final time.[135] Alexios immediately faced the Normans under Robert Guiscard and repelled them through warfare and diplomacy.[136] He then targeted the Pechenegs and decisively defeated them in 1091 with help from the Cumans, who were in turn defeated three years later.[137] Finally, looking to recover Asia Minor from the Seljuks, he approached Pope Urban II for help c. 1095. He did not anticipate the scale of western Christendom's response—the First Crusade led to the recapture of western Anatolia, although Alexios and its leaders soon fell out.[138] The rest of his reign was spent dealing with the Normans and Seljuks, establishing a new, loyal aristocracy to ensure stability, and carrying out fiscal and ecclesiastical reforms.[139]

A mosaic depicting a haloed woman holding a baby, flanked by a man and woman, both crowned and haloed
A mosaic from the Hagia Sophia of Constantinople (modern Istanbul), depicting Mary and Jesus, flanked by John II Komnenos (left) and his wife Irene of Hungary (right), 12th century

Alexios' concentration of power in the hands of his Komnenos dynasty meant the most serious political threats came from within the imperial family—before his coronation, John II had to overcome his mother Irene and his sister Anna, and the primary threat during his reign was his brother Isaac.[140] John campaigned annually and extensively—he fought the Pechenegs in 1122, the Hungarians in the late 1120s, and the Seljuks throughout his reign, waging large campaigns in Syria in his final years—but he did not achieve large territorial gains.[141] In 1138, John raised the imperial standard over the Crusader Principality of Antioch to intimidate the city into allying with the Byzantines, but did not attack, fearing that it would provoke western Christendom to respond.[142]

Manuel I used his father's overflowing imperial treasury in pursuit of his ambitions, and also to secure the empire's position in an increasingly multilateral geopolitical landscape.[143] Through a combination of diplomacy and bribery, he cultivated a ring of allies and clients around the empire: the Turks of the Sultanate of Rum, the Kingdom of Hungary, the Cilician Armenians, Balkan princes, Italian and Dalmatian cities, and most importantly Antioch and the Crusader States, marrying one of their princesses in 1161.[144] Manuel averted the threat of war during the tumultuous passage of the Second Crusade through Byzantine territories in 1147, but the campaign's failure was blamed on the Byzantines by western contemporaries.[145] He was less successful militarily: an invasion of Sicily was decisively defeated by King William I in 1156, leading to tensions with Frederick Barbarossa, the Holy Roman Emperor;[146] two decades later, an invasion of Anatolia was resoundingly defeated at the Battle of Myriokephalon.[147]

A painting of an army marching into a city gate with much smoke in the background
The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople, by Eugène Delacroix (1840)

Manuel's death left the empire rudderless and it soon came under intense pressure.[148] His son Alexios II was too young to rule, and his troubled regency was overthrown by his uncle Andronikos I Komnenos: he was replaced by Isaac II in 1185.[149] Centrifugal forces swirled at the borders as ambitious rulers seized their chance: Hungary and the Turks captured Byzantine territories, an exiled Komnenian prince seized Cyprus; and most injuriously, a revolt in 1185 caused the foundation of a resurrected Bulgarian state.[150] Relations with the West deteriorated further after Constantinople allied with Saladin, the vanquisher of the Third Crusade, whose leaders also fought against Byzantium as they passed through its territory.[151] In 1195, Isaac II was deposed by his brother Alexios III; this quarrel proved fatal.[152]

The Fourth Crusade was originally intended to target Egypt, but amid strategic difficulties, Isaac II's son Alexios Angelos convinced the crusaders to restore his father to the throne in exchange for a huge tribute.[153] They attacked Constantinople in 1203, reinstating Isaac II and his son to the throne. The new rulers swiftly grew unpopular and were deposed by Alexios V, an event used by the crusaders as a pretext to sack the city in April 1204, ransacking the wealth it had accumulated over nine centuries.[154]

1204–1453: Palaiologos dynasty[edit | edit source]

A map showing the competing states after the Fourth Crusade.
The partition of the empire following the Fourth Crusade, c. 1204[155]

Byzantine territories fragmented into competing political entities. The crusaders crowned Baldwin I as the ruler of a new Latin Empire in Constantinople; it soon suffered a crushing defeat against the Bulgarians in 1205. It also failed to expand west or east, where three Greek successor states had formed: the Empire of Nicaea and the Empire of Trebizond in Asia Minor, and the Despotate of Epirus on the Adriatic. The Venetians acquired many ports and islands, and the Principality of Achaea emerged in southern Greece.[155] Trebizond lost the key port of Sinope in 1214 and thereafter was unable to affect matters away from the southeastern Black Sea.[156] For a time, it seemed that Epirus was the one most likely to reclaim Constantinople from the Latins, and its ruler Theodore Doukas crowned himself emperor, but he suffered a critical defeat at the Battle of Klokotnitsa in 1230, and Epirote power waned.[157]

Nicaea, ruled by the Laskarid dynasty and composed of a mixture of Byzantine refugees and native Greeks, blocked the Latins and the Seljuks of Rum from expanding east and west respectively.[158] John III (r. 1221–1254) was a very capable emperor.[159] His protectionist economic policies strongly encouraged Nicaean self-sufficiency,[160] and he made many diplomatic treaties, especially after Mongol armies ravaged Bulgaria and defeated Rum between 1237 and 1243. This chaos was an opportunity for John, and he fought many successful campaigns against the states disrupted by the Mongol invasions.[161] Soon after his death, his grandson was usurped by Michael VIII, founder of the Palaiologos dynasty, who recaptured Constantinople in 1261.[162]

Michael desired to restore the empire's glory through a rebuilding programme in Constantinople, clever diplomatic alliances, and expansionist wars in Europe.[163] He staved off the threatening Charles I of Anjou first by recognising papal primacy and certain Catholic doctrines at the 1274 Second Council of Lyon, and then by aiding the Sicilian Vespers against Charles in 1282.[164] However, his religious concessions were despised by most of the populace, and were repudiated by his successor Andronikos II (r. 1282–1328).[165] He and his grandson Andronikos III (r. 1328–1341) led several campaigns to restore imperial influence, succeeding in Epirus and Thessaly. They also made several critical mistakes, including dismissing the fleet in 1285, hiring the mercenary Catalan Company, who turned on the Byzantines, in the 1300s, and fighting each other between 1320 and 1328.[166] A disastrous civil war between 1341 and 1354 caused long-term economic difficulties, while the Ottoman Turks gradually expanded.[167]

A painting of a siege of a city
The siege of Constantinople in 1453, depicted in a 15th-century French miniature

The diminished and weak Byzantine state only survived for another century through effective diplomacy and fortunately timed external events.[168] The Ottomans gradually subjugated Anatolia and simultaneously expanded into Europe from 1354, taking Philippopolis in 1363, Adrianopolis in 1369, and Thessalonica in 1387.[169] Emperors were crowned and deposed at the whim of the Venetians, Genoese, and Ottomans.[170] After Manuel II (r. 1391–1425) refused to pay homage to Sultan Bayezid I in 1394, Constantinople was besieged until the rampaging warlord Timur decisively defeated Bayezid in 1402, with the city perilously close to surrender.[171]

Manuel II oversaw two decades of peace while the Ottomans convulsed in civil war.[172] In 1421, his unsuccessful backing of the claimant Mustafa Çelebi led to a renewed Turkish assault.[173] Although John VIII (r. 1425–1448) reconciled with the Catholic West at the Council of Florence, his empire steadily diminished.[174] In 1452, Sultan Mehmed II resolved to capture Constantinople, and laid siege early the following year. On 29 May 1453, the city was captured, the last emperor, Constantine XI, died in battle, and the Byzantine Empire ended.[175]

Structures of the state[edit | edit source]

A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colours in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (green), Anatolic (brown), Bucellarians (orange) and Armeniacs (purple). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Samos, Crete and Cyprus.
The themes of Asia Minor, c. 750
A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colours in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Samos (dark grey), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (dark grey), Anatolic and Seleucia (brown), Bucellarians (orange), Paphlagonia (navy blue), Cappadocia (green), Charsianon (pink), Armeniacs (purple), Lycandus and Mesopotamia (brown), Sebastea (blue), Koloneia (dark green) and Chaldia (light blue). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Crete and Cyprus.
The themes of Asia Minor, c. 950

Governance[edit | edit source]

Diocletian and Constantine's 4th-century reforms reorganised the empire's provinces into overarching Dioceses and then into Praetorian prefectures, separating the army from the civil administration.[176] The central government, led by the emperor from the time of the earlier pax romana and into the late Palaiologan era, typically focused on the military, foreign relations, administering the law, and collecting taxes.[177] A person usually ascended into the position of emperor after a ceremony. The senate evolved into a ceremonial body within the imperial court.[178]

Cities had been a collection of self-governing communities with central government and church representatives from the 5th century.[179] However, constant warfare significantly altered this, as regular raids and ongoing conflict led to power centralising due to the empire's fight for survival.[180] After the 7th century, the prefectures were abandoned, and in the 9th century, the provinces were divided into administrative units called themes (or themata), governed solely by a military commander (strategos).[181]

Law[edit | edit source]

Theodosius II (r. 408–450) formalised Roman law by appointing five jurists as principal authorities and compiling legislation issued since Constantine's reign into the Codex Theodosianus.[182] This process culminated in the Corpus Juris Civilis under Justinian I (r. 527–565), who commissioned a complete standardisation of imperial decrees since Hadrian's time and resolved conflicting legal opinions of the jurists.[183] The result became the definitive legal authority. This body of law covered civil matters and also public law, including imperial power and administrative organisation.[184] After 534, Justinian issued the Novellae (New Laws) in Greek, which marked a transition from Roman to Byzantine law. Legal historian Bernard Stolte distinguishes Roman law as this because Western Europe inherited law through the Latin texts of the Corpus Juris Civilis only.[185]

Zachary Chitwood argues that the Corpus Juris Civilis was largely inaccessible in Latin, particularly in the provinces.[186] Following the 7th-century Arab conquests, people began questioning the development and application of law, leading to stronger ties between law and Christianity.[187] This context influenced Leo III (r. 717–741) to develop the Ecloga, which placed an emphasis on humanity.[188] The Ecloga inspired practical legal texts like the Farmers' Law, Seamen's Law, and Soldiers' Law, which Chitwood suggests were used daily in the provinces as companions to the Corpus Juris Civilis.[189] During the Macedonian dynasty, efforts to reform law began with the publication of the Procheiron and the Eisagoge, which aimed to define the emperor's power under prevailing laws, and to replace the Ecloga due to its association with iconoclasm.[190] Leo VI (r. 886–912) completed a complete codification of Roman law in Greek through the Basilika, a work of 60 books which became the foundation of Byzantine law.[191] In 1345, Constantine Harmenopoulos compiled the Hexabiblos, a six-volume law book derived from various Byzantine legal sources.[192]

Christianity and the Church[edit | edit source]

Christianity, bolstered by Constantine's support, began shaping all aspects of life in the early Byzantine Empire.[193] Despite the transition, the historian Anthony Kaldellis views Christianity as "bringing no economic, social, or political changes to the state other than being more deeply integrated into it".[194] When the Roman state in the West collapsed politically, cultural differences began to divide the Christian churches of the East and West.[195] Internal disputes within the Eastern churches led to the migration of monastic communities to Rome, exacerbating tensions between Rome and Constantinople.[196] These disputes,[lower-alpha 3] particularly in Egypt and the eastern Mediterranean, eventually split the church into three branches: Chalcedonian, Monophysite (Coptic), and Nestorian.[199] The Chalcedonian group maintained dominance within the empire's territories, while the Monophysite and Nestorian branches largely fell under Muslim rule in the 7th century.[200]

Eastern patriarchs frequently sought the Papacy's mediation in doctrinal and practical matters, but the pope's authority was not universally acknowledged, even in nearby regions like Northern Italy.[201] By 600, the Slavic settlement of the Balkans disrupted communication between Rome and Constantinople, further widening the divide.[202] The Arab and Lombard invasions, and the increased Frankish presence, deepened this estrangement and intensified disputes over jurisdiction and authority between the two spiritual centres.[203] Differences in ritual and theology, such as the use of unleavened bread and the Filioque clause, as well as divergences in ecclesiology—plenitudo potestatis versus the authority of Ecumenical Councils—and issues of mutual respect, contributed to the separation of Western Christianity from Eastern Christianity.[204] This separation began by 597 and culminated in 1054 during the East–West Schism.[205]

Warfare[edit | edit source]

Military evolution[edit | edit source]

In the late 6th century, following Justinian I's wars, seven mobile field armies called comitatenses, numbering around 150,000 troops, were deployed around the empire; they remained the finest armies in Europe.[206] They were aided by twenty-five frontier garrisons of approximately 195,000 lower-quality limitanei troops.[207] Additional troops included subsidised allied forces and imperial guard units like the Scholae Palatinae.[208] Naval forces were limited: flotillas were based at key locations, while 30,000 oarsmen were assembled to row 500, mostly requisitioned, transports to support the Vandalic War in Africa in 533.[209]

The losses suffered in the 7th-century Arab conquests led to fundamental changes.[210] The field armies were withdrawn into the core Anatolian territories and assigned to settle in specific districts, which became known as themata and eventually replaced the old provinces.[211] The thematic armies, supported by the proceeds of their districts, came to resemble a provincial militia with a small professional core, aided by foreign mercenaries and imperial regiments at Constantinople.[212] To defend against its new Muslim enemy, the navy was similarly reorganised into several provincialised fleets.[213] It became the dominant power in the eastern Mediterranean, with dromons equipped with Greek fire proving crucial on several occasions.[214]

As the 8th-century empire stabilised, the thematic militias proved rebellious and only suitable for defensive operations.[215] The professional tagmata regiments, first introduced in the mid-700s and consisting of native Byzantine units alongside foreign forces such as the Varangian Guard, had completely replaced them by the 11th century.[216] The mobile tagmata, suitable for offensive warfare, evolved new tactical and strategic structures;[217] the late 10th-century army, perhaps the highest-quality force the empire produced, numbered approximately 140,000, up from below 100,000 in the late 700s.[218] However, its defensive capacities were neglected, especially during the 11th-century civil wars, leading to the loss of Anatolia to the Seljuks.[219] The navy had also been reduced, as the empire increasingly relied on potentially hostile powers such as Venice.[220]

Post-1081 reforms re-established an effective army; the institution of feudal-like pronoia grants provided revenue to individuals in exchange for soldiers.[221] The new army heavily relied on foreign mercenaries alongside indigenous Byzantine troops, but the financial demands of a standing army proved too much for the Byzantine state, which succumbed to the Fourth Crusade in 1204.[222] The army of the Palaiologan dynasty, which retook Constantinople in 1261, was generally composed of a similar mix of mercenaries and indigenous troops, but it had lost all offensive capability by the late 1200s.[223] The empire's continued survival depended on foreign armies; attempts in the 1340s to rebuild the fleet, unwisely disbanded in 1284, were forcibly halted by Genoa.[224] No post-1204 Byzantine field army fielded more than 5,000 troops, and less than 8,000 defended the final siege of Constantinople in 1453.[225]

Diplomacy[edit | edit source]

Manuscript illustration of an embassy travelling between two rulers
The embassy of John the Grammarian in 829, sent by emperor Theophilos to the Abbasid caliph Al-Ma'mun

Byzantine strategy was primarily defensive, aside from the brief period of aggression between the ninth and eleventh centuries, because of the empire's habitual lack of resources.[226] To avoid risky and expensive military campaigns, the Byzantines engaged in extensive diplomatic efforts.[227] These took various forms, including: formal embassies, client management, alliance or peace negotiations, political marriages, propaganda and bribery, or even espionage and assassination.[228]

Defensively oriented Byzantine diplomacy was intended to protect the oikoumenē, the civilised Christian world which the empire rightfully ruled.[229] The decline of the key limitrophe system, wherein client states along the borders served as intermediaries between the empire and other large enemies, exposed the empire to attack. By the eleventh century, Byzantine diplomacy was more bilateral and balanced.[230] Although it lost some important advantages post-1204, diplomacy, including the still-influential Orthodox church, was nevertheless a central element in the empire's lengthy survival until 1453.[231]

Society[edit | edit source]

Demography[edit | edit source]

Scholars associate the Roman, Hellenic, and Christian imperial identities with the general population, but there is ongoing debate about how these and other regional identities blended together.[232]

As many as 27 million people lived in the empire at its peak in 540, but this fell to 12 million by 800.[233] Although plague and territorial losses to Arab Muslim invaders weakened the empire, it eventually recovered and by the near end of the Macedonian dynasty in 1025, the population is estimated to have been as high as 18 million.[234] A few decades after the recapture of Constantinople in 1282, the empire's population was in the range of 3–5 million; by 1312, the number had dropped to 2 million.[235] By the time the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople, there were only 50,000 people in the city, one-tenth of its population in its prime.[236]

Cuisine and dining[edit | edit source]

Feasting was central to the culture.[237] By the 10th century, dining shifted from reclining to tables with clean linen.[238] The introduction of the fork and salad dressing (with oil and vinegar) further shaped Italian and Western traditions.[239] Classical Greco-Roman era foods were common such as the condiment garos (similar to fermented fish sauces today) as well as the still popular baklava.[240] Fruits like aubergine and orange, unknown during classical times, were added to diets.[241] Foods that have continued into the modern era include the cured meat paston, Feta cheese, salt roe similar to the modern boutargue, Black sea caviar, tiropita, dolmades, and the soup trachanas.[242] There were famed medieval sweet wines such as the Malvasia from Monemvasia, the Commandaria, and the eponymous Rumney wine which were drunk, as were millet beer (known as boza) and retsina.[243]

Recreation[edit | edit source]

A depiction of a board game
A game of τάβλι (tabula) played by the Byzantine emperor Zeno in 480 and recorded by Agathias in c. 530 because of a very unlucky dice throw for Zeno (red)[244]

Chariot races were held from the early era until 1204, becoming one of the world's longest continuous sporting events.[245] Mimes, the pantomime and some wild animal shows were prominent until the 6th century.[246] Because Christian bishops and pagan philosophers did not like these activities, the state's funding for them ceased, leading to their decline and a move to private entertainment and sporting.[247] A Persian version of polo introduced by the Crusaders called Tzykanion was played by the nobility and urban aristocracy in major cities during the middle and late eras, as was the sport of jousting introduced from the West.[248] Over time, game boards like tavli became increasingly popular.[249]

Language[edit | edit source]

A photograph of two pages of a book written in a Greek script. The lower portions of both pages are damaged.
A photograph of an illustrated manuscript written in Greek. At the left are two people who are standing talking to a person who is seated, while 5 soldiers listen. At the right are a group of soldiers going somewhere.
Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete psalter in the Coptic language (Coptic Museum, Egypt, Coptic Cairo).
Right: The Joshua Roll, a 10th-century illuminated Greek manuscript possibly made in Constantinople (Vatican Library, Rome).

Latin and Greek were the primary languages of the late Roman Empire, with the former prevalent in the west and the latter in the east.[250] Although Latin was historically important in the military, legal system, and government, its use declined in Byzantine territories from 400 AD.[251] Greek had begun to replace it even in those functions by the time of Justinian I (r. 527–565), who may have tried to arrest Latin's decline. Its extinction in the east was thereafter inevitable.[252] A similar process of linguistic Hellenization occurred in Asia Minor, whose inhabitants had mostly abandoned their indigenous languages for Greek by early Byzantine times.[253] Still, much of the population of the empire would have known neither Latin nor Greek, especially in rural areas—their languages included Armenian in Byzantine Armenia, Aramaic dialects such as Syriac in Mesopotamia and the Levant, Coptic in Egypt, Phoenician on the Levant coast and in Carthage, and Berber in rural North Africa.[254]

The empire lost its linguistic diversity in the wars of the 7th and 8th centuries, becoming overwhelmingly Greek-speaking.[255] During this troubled period, classical Attic Greek—one of the linguistic registers the Byzantine Greeks inherited—fell out of use, while the everyday vernacular registers were still used.[256] As the empire gained some stability from the 9th century onwards, and especially after the Komnenian restoration, Attic Greek came back into fashion for written works. In a phenomenon called diglossia, the gap between vernacular spoken Greek, which was rarely written in published works, and literary registers only spoken in formal contexts, became very wide.[257]

During the Palaiologan period, although classically written works remained the normal style, Western-inspired writers began to use more vernacular elements, especially for romances or near-contemporary histories. One example is the Chronicle of the Morea, probably written by a French immigrant who was ignorant of formal Greek literature and who incorporated spoken Greek into his work.[258] All such written vernacular was in verse form, becoming the ancestor of modern Greek poetry, while prose remained classically written.[259]

Economy[edit | edit source]

The empire's geographic and maritime advantages reduced the costs of transporting goods and facilitated trade, making it a key driver of economic growth from antiquity and through the post-classical period.[260] Infrastructure, including roads, public buildings, and the legal system, supported trade and other economic activities.[261] Regions like Asia Minor, the Aegean islands, Egypt, the Levant, and Africa thrived as mature economic centres despite political challenges and military insecurities.[262] From the mid-6th century onward, plagues, invasions, and wars caused populations and economies to decline, leading to the collapse of the ancient economy.[263] Major cities like Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria, and Thessaloniki continued to support substantial populations exceeding 100,000, while the countryside transitioned into fortified settlements.[264] These rural areas developed into hamlets and villages, reflecting an economic shift between historical periods towards more efficient land use.[265]

Low population density prompted emperors to encourage migration and resettlement, stimulating agriculture and demographic growth.[266] By the 9th century, the economy began to revive, marked by increased agricultural production and urban expansion.[267] Advances in science, technical knowledge, and literacy gave the empire a competitive edge over its neighbours.[268] The 11th and 12th centuries witnessed consistent and rapid population growth, marking the peak of this revival.[269] Italian merchants, particularly the Venetians, Genoese, and Pisans, took control of international trade, thus reducing the influence of native merchants.[270] The political system grew increasingly extractive and authoritarian, contributing to the empire's collapse in 1204.[271]

The fall of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1204 destroyed centuries of its wealth.[272] Large landholdings were confiscated, and the empire fragmented into smaller rump states ruled by competing factions, making governance inefficient and increasing the costs of doing business.[273] The state gradually lost control over trade practices, price regulations, the outflow of precious metals, and possibly even the minting of coins.[274] Italian merchants further dominated trade as the events of 1204 opened the Black Sea to Western merchants, permanently altering the empire's fortunes.[275] Farmers and manufacturers increasingly produced goods for local use and were affected by the insecurity of constant warfare.[276] Despite these challenges, the empire's mixed economy (characterised by state interventions, public works, and market liberalisation)[277] remained a model of medieval economic adaptability, even as it deteriorated under external pressures.[278]

Arts and sciences[edit | edit source]

Art and architecture[edit | edit source]

Clockwise, from top left:

Subjects in Byzantine art were primarily Christian and typically non-naturalistic in their representation.[281] Emerging from both the earliest Christian and Late Antique art,[282] many early examples were lost amid the Roman Persecutions; the fragmented mosaics of the 3rd-century Dura-Europos church are a unique exception.[283] Such Byzantine mosaics, known for their gold ground style, became a hallmark of the empire, displaying both secular and sacred themes in diverse places, including churches (Basilica of San Vitale), the circus (Hippodrome of Constantinople), and the Great Palace of Constantinople.[284] The early 6th-century reign of Justinian I saw systemic developments: religious art came to dominate, and once-popular public marble and bronze monumental sculpture fell out of favour due to pagan associations.[285] Justinian commissioned the monumental Hagia Sophia church, and its influential elements became architectural hallmarks for the empire: the immense size, large dome, innovative use of pendentives and highly decorative interior were imitated as far north as the Cathedral of Saint Sophia in Novgorod and the Saint Sophia Cathedral in Kiev.[286] The Hagia Sophia's creators, the engineer-architects Isidore of Miletus and Anthemius of Tralles, are uniquely esteemed;[287] most Byzantine artists were unrecorded and typically deemed to have little importance.[288]

Smaller-scale art flourished throughout the entire Byzantine period: costly ivory carvings—often as diptychs (Barberini ivory) or triptychs (Harbaville Triptych)—featured imperial commemorations or religious scenes and were particularly valued, as were metalwork and enamels.[289] Other costly objects included illuminated manuscripts, which were lavishly illustrated for a wide range of texts, and silks, often dyed in the prized imperial purple; both became highly popular in Western Europe.[290] The rise of small, portable icon paintings, used for both public and private religious worship, grew increasingly controversial.[291] During two periods of Byzantine Iconoclasm (726–843), possibly influenced by Islamic prohibitions on religious images,[292] icons were suppressed and enormous amounts of figurative religious art was destroyed.[293] Iconoclasts condemned their use, likening them to pagan idolatry and ascribing recent Umayyad defeats as divine retribution for their use. Iconophiles eventually prevailed, maintaining their essential use for veneration, considered distinct from worship, and found precedent in gospel references.[294]

Post-iconoclast Macedonian art (867–1056) saw a cultural renaissance, and many artworks from this period survive.[295] Subjects and styles became standardised, particularly cross-in-square churches, and already-existing frontality and symmetry evolved into a dominant artistic aesthetic, observable in the small Pala d'Oro enamel and the large mosaics of the Hosios Loukas, Daphni, and Nea Moni monasteries.[296] The subsequent Komnenos-Angelos periods (1081–1204) saw increased imperial patronage, alongside figurative artwork of increased emotional expression (Dead Christ and Mourners, c. 1164).[280] Byzantine artistic influence spread widely to Norman Sicily (the Madrid Skylitzes) and Venice (the mosaics of St Mark's Basilica).[280] Serbian churches flourished, as three successive schools of architectureRaška (1170–1282), Byzantine Serbia (1282–1355), and Morava (1355–1489)—combined a Romanesque aesthetic with increasingly voluminous decorations and domes.[297] As smaller Palaeologan artworks (1261–1453) gained relic status in Western Europe—many looted in the 1204 Fourth Crusade—they greatly influenced the Italo-Byzantine style of Cimabue, Duccio, and later Giotto; the latter is traditionally regarded by art historians as the inaugurator of Italian Renaissance painting.[298]

Literature[edit | edit source]

Byzantine literature concerns all Greek literature from the Middle Ages.[299] Although the empire was linguistically diverse, the vast majority of extant texts are in medieval Greek,[300] in two diglossic variants: a scholarly form based on Attic Greek, and a vernacular based on Koine Greek.[301] Most contemporary scholars consider all medieval Greek texts to be literature,[302] but some offer varying constraints.[303] The literature's early period (c. 330–650) was dominated by the competing cultures of Hellenism, Christianity and Paganism.[304] The Greek Church Fathers—educated in an Ancient Greek rhetoric tradition—sought to synthesise these influences.[299] Important early writers include John Chrysostom, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Procopius, all of whom aimed to reinvent older forms to fit the empire.[305] Theological miracle stories were particularly innovative and popular;[305] the Sayings of the Desert Fathers (Apophthegmata Patrum) were copied in nearly every Byzantine monastery.[306] During the Byzantine Dark Ages (c. 650–800), production of literature mostly stopped, though some important theologians were active, such as Maximus the Confessor, Germanus I of Constantinople and John of Damascus.[305]

The subsequent cultural Macedonian Renaissance (c. 800–1000; the "Encyclopedism period") saw a renewed proliferation of literature and revived the earlier Hellenic-Christian synthesis.[299] Works by Homer, Ancient Greek philosophers and tragedians were translated, and hagiography was heavily reorganised.[305] After this early flowering of monastic literature, there was a dearth until Symeon the New Theologian in the late 10th century.[305] A new generation (c. 1000–1250), including Symeon, Michael Psellos and Theodore Prodromos, rejected the Encyclopedist emphasis on order, and were interested in individual-focused ideals variously concerning mysticism, authorial voice, heroism, humour and love.[307] This included the Hellenistic-inspired Byzantine romance and chivalric approaches in rhetoric, historiography and the influential epic Digenes Akritas.[305] The empire's final centuries saw a renewal of hagiography and increased Western influence, leading to mass Greek to Latin translations.[308] Authors such as Gemistos Plethon and Bessarion exemplified a new focus on human vices alongside the preservation of classical traditions, the latter greatly influenced the Italian Renaissance.[308]

Music[edit | edit source]

Late 4th-century "Mosaic of the Musicians" playing the organ, aulos, and lyre from a Byzantine villa in Maryamin, Syria[309]
Late 4th-century "Mosaic of the Musicians" playing the organ, aulos, and lyre from a Byzantine villa in Maryamin, Syria[309]

Byzantine music is eclectically descended from early Christian plainsong, Jewish music, and a variety of ancient music; its exact connections to ancient Greek music remain uncertain.[310] It included both sacred and secular traditions, but the latter is little known, whereas the former remains the central music of Eastern Orthodox liturgy into the 21st century.[311] The empire's church music, known as Byzantine chant, was exclusively unaccompanied monodic vocal music, sung in Greek.[312] From the 8th century, chant melodies were governed by the Oktōēchos framework, a set of eight modesechos (ἦχος; Template:Lit.)—each of these provide predetermined motivic formulae for composition.[313] These formulae were chosen for proper text stress and occasionally for text painting, then collated through centonisation into hymns or psalms.[314]

Byzantine chant was central to the Byzantine Rite; the earliest music was not notated,[315] including early monostrophic short hymns like the troparion.[316] Proto-Ekphonetic notation (9th century onwards) marked simple recitation patterns. The neumatic Palaeo-Byzantine notation system emerged in the 10th century, and the Middle Byzantine "Round Notation" from the mid-12th century onwards is the first fully diastematic scheme.[317] Several major forms developed alongside well-known composers: the long kontakion (5th century onwards), popularised by Romanos the Melodist; the also-extensive kanōn (late 7th century onwards), developed by Andrew of Crete; and the shorter sticheron (at least 8th century onwards), championed by Kassia.[318] By the Palaiologan period, the dominance of strict compositional rules lessened and John Koukouzeles led a new school favouring a more ornamental "kalophonic" style which deeply informed post-empire Neo-Byzantine music.[319]

Secular music, often state-sponsored, was ubiquitous in daily life and featured in a variety of ceremonies, festivals, and theatre.[320] Secular vocal music was rarely notated, and extant manuscripts date much later, suggesting the tradition was passed through oral tradition and likely improvised.[321] Prohibited for liturgical use, a wide variety of Byzantine instruments flourished in secular contexts, although no notated instrumental music survives.[322] It is uncertain to what extent instrumentalists improvised or if they doubled vocalists monophonically or heterophonically.[323] Among the best known instruments are the hydraulic organ, used for circus and imperial court events; the ancient Greek-descended aulos, a wind instrument; the tambouras, a plucked string instrument; and mostly popularly, the Byzantine lyra.[323] Prominent genres included acclamation chants of laudation or salutation; the celebratory Acritic songs; symposia instrumental banquets, based on ancient symposiums; and dance music.[324]

Science and technology[edit | edit source]

A photograph of the interior of a building built with blue arches and pillars and ornate yellow walls
Interior of the Hagia Sophia; the influence of Archimedes' principles of solid geometry is evident.

The scholars of the empire played a principal role in transmitting classical knowledge to the Islamic world and Renaissance Italy, as well as producing commentaries that helped expand scientific knowledge.[325] This medieval Greek scholarship was not only based on scientific treatises from antiquity but also drew from Islamic, Latin, and Hebrew works, which helped spearhead new developments as late as the 11th and 12th centuries.[326] Although the Empire is sometimes not associated with scientific innovation or major discoveries,[327] its scientific contributions have also been described as underestimated.[328] Incomplete assessments of Byzantine texts[328] and the challenges of applying modern definitions of science to pre-modern contexts are factors in these ongoing debates.[329]

Two pots surrounded by caltrops
Ceramic grenades which were filled with Greek fire, surrounded by caltrops, 10th–12th century, National Historical Museum, Athens

Key people passed on important traditions that underpinned this scholarship, especially in the realms of philosophy, geometry, astronomy, and grammar.[330] For example, the Hagia Sophia architect Isidore of Miletus (c. 530), compiled Archimedes' works which Leo the Mathematician (c. 850) incorporated into formal courses, and is why the Archimedes Palimpsest is known today.[331] John Philoponus and his critiques of Aristotelian physics, the pharmacologist Pedanius Dioscorides, and Ptolematic geography and astronomy had an important influence on western science, as seen with Ptolemy's influence on Copernicus and Philoponus on Bonaventure, Gersonides, Buridan, Oresme and Galileo.[332]

Military innovations included the riding stirrup which provided stability for mounted archers and dramatically transformed the army; a specialised type of horseshoe; the lateen sail, which improved a ship's responsiveness to wind; and Greek fire—an incendiary weapon capable of burning even when doused with water, first appearing around the time of the Siege of Constantinople (674–678).[333] In healthcare, the empire pioneered the concept of the hospital as an institution offering medical care and the possibility of a cure for the patients, rather than merely being a place to die.[334]

Legacy[edit | edit source]

Political aftermath[edit | edit source]

A map centred on Greece and Turkey in 1450 AD. The Byzantine Empire holds only Southern Greece and northwestern Turkey
The Eastern Mediterranean just before the Fall of Constantinople

After Constantinople fell, the Ottomans quickly absorbed the remaining independent territories, including Acciaiuoli Athens in 1458, Morea in 1460, Trebizond in 1461, and Gattilusi Lesbos in 1462.[335] They dismantled the Empire's political and secular institutions, leaving the impoverished Church to manage what would be later called the Rum Millet, primarily as a tool for taxing its followers.[336] As the sole sovereign Orthodox state, Russia developed the Third Rome doctrine, emphasising its cultural heritage as distinct from Western Europe, because the latter had inherited much of the empire's secular learning.[337] The Danubian Principalities became a haven for Orthodox Christians and Phanariot Greeks who sought to recreate a Byzantine Greek Empire.[338] In modern Greece, members of the Rum Millet increasingly identified as Greeks, eventually leading to a successful war of independence in the 19th century.[339] The modern Greek state nearly doubled its territory through the pursuit of the Megali Idea—a vision of reclaiming the former lands of the eastern empire—achieving limited success during the Crimean War but making significant gains during the Balkan Wars.[340]

Since the 15th century, Byzantine history has been deeply politicised, woven into nationalist, colonialist, and imperialist narratives.[341] This politicisation appears not only in Greece but also in Bulgarian, Romanian, Serbian, Hungarian, and Turkish nationalism, as well as in former French and Russian imperialist agendas.[342] In the English-speaking world, interpretations of Byzantine history frequently surface in political debates, alongside the growing appreciation for its legacy.[343] The complexity of this history makes it a sensitive topic, especially regarding Greece's role in Europe's evolving sense of identity and the origin stories of many European nations.[344]

Cultural aftermath[edit | edit source]

A photograph of statue, which depicts two bearded and hooded men; the one on the left is holding up a cross and the one on the right is holding up a book
Monument to St. Cyril and St. Methodius, Byzantine missionaries to the Slavs, on Mt. Radhošť in Czechia

The Byzantine Empire distinctively blended Roman political traditions, Greek literary heritage, and Christianity, creating the civilisational framework that laid the foundation for medieval Europe.[345] The Empire preserved European civilisation by acting as a shield against forces from Eurasian Steppe people such as the Avars, Bulgars, Cumans, Huns, Pechenegs, and Turks.[346]

The empire's legal codes significantly influenced the civil law traditions of continental Europe, Russia, Latin America, Ethiopia, and even the English-speaking common law countries; and possibly influenced Islamic legal traditions as well.[347][348] It also preserved and transmitted classical learning and manuscripts, making important contributions to the intellectual revival which fuelled Italian humanism.[349]

The Byzantine Empire played a pivotal role in shaping Christianity by supporting early Church fathers and the decisions of Church councils; developing the institution of monasticism; and fostering the Orthodox tradition which continues to define much of Eastern European identity.[350] It was also instrumental in preserving the Greek language and is credited with developing the Glagolitic alphabet, which later evolved into the Cyrillic script and Old Church Slavonic.[351] These innovations provided the first literary language for the Slavs and formed the educational foundation for all Slavic nations.[352]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.. Due to the imperial seat's move to Byzantium, the adoption of state Christianity, and the predominance of Greek instead of Latin, most historians make a distinction between the earlier Roman Empire and the later Byzantine Empire.[5]
  2. Leo VI was officially the son of Basil I, but a persistent rumour alleged that he had been fathered by Michael III, who had previously taken Leo's mother Eudokia Ingerina as his mistress. One of Leo's first acts was to rebury Michael III in Basil's mausoleum in the Church of the Holy Apostles complex, which exacerbated the rumours.[113]
  3. Arianism, one of the first major controversies, shook the empire until it was addressed by the Nicene Creed.[197] Other controversies persisted, leading to schisms, such as debates on the fundamental definitions of Christ's nature at the Council of Chalcedon in 451.[198]

Citations[edit | edit source]

  1. Treadgold 1997, p. 137.
  2. Treadgold 1997, p. 278.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Treadgold 1997, p. 236.
  4. Treadgold 1997, p. 570.
  5. Millar 2006, pp. 2, 15; Kaldellis 2007, pp. 2–3.
  6. Kaldellis 2022a, pp. 351; Aschenbrenner & Ransohoff 2022a, p. 1.
  7. Aschenbrenner & Ransohoff 2022a, p. 1.
  8. Kaldellis 2023, p. 2; Aschenbrenner & Ransohoff 2022a, p. 2.
  9. Kaldellis 2022a, pp. 349, 351; Cormack, Haldon & Jeffreys 2008, p. 4.
  10. Aschenbrenner & Ransohoff 2022a, p. 2.
  11. Magdalino 2025, pp. 41-43.
  12. Kaldellis 2022a, p. 352.
  13. Kaldellis 2022a, pp. 352, 355, 357.
  14. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 2–3; Cormack, Haldon & Jeffreys 2008, p. 4; Stouraitis 2022b, pp. 20, 29, 31, 33-36; Treadgold 2025, pp. xiii–xiv.
  15. Cameron 2002, pp. 190–191.
  16. Cameron 2002, pp. 166, 191; Kaldellis 2015; Howard-Johnston 2024, p. 7.
  17. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 3, 34.
  18. Greatrex 2008, p. 232.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Greatrex 2008, p. 233.
  20. Greatrex 2008, p. 233; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 16-17; Treadgold 1997, p. 7.
  21. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 17–18; Treadgold 1997, pp. 15, 17–18.
  22. Greatrex 2008, p. 235; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 17–18; Treadgold 1997, p. 14.
  23. Greatrex 2008, p. 235.
  24. Greatrex 2008, p. 235; Treadgold 1997, pp. 39–40; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 18.
  25. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 17, 20.
  26. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 18–20.
  27. Greatrex 2008, pp. 235–236; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 43–44.
  28. Greatrex 2008, pp. 236–237; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 81–84; Treadgold 1997, pp. 31–33, 40–42.
  29. Greatrex 2008, p. 238; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 93, 98, 111-112; Treadgold 1997, pp. 52-53, 59–62.
  30. Greatrex 2008, pp. 239–240; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 114–118, 121–123; Treadgold 1997, pp. 63–67.
  31. Greatrex 2008, p. 240; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 128–129; Treadgold 1997, p. 73.
  32. Greatrex 2008, p. 241; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 129-130, 135–137; Treadgold 1997, pp. 74–75.
  33. Greatrex 2008, pp. 240–241; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 126–128; Treadgold 1997, pp. 70-74.
  34. Kaldellis 2023, p. 136.
  35. Kaldellis 2023, p. 165; Treadgold 1997, p. 87.
  36. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 165–167, 244.
  37. Greatrex 2008, p. 242; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 15, 20-21.
  38. Shepard 2009, p. 22-23; Treadgold 1997, pp. 91-92.
  39. Greatrex 2008, p. 242; Kaldellis 2023, p. 173; Treadgold 1997, pp. 92.
  40. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 193–196; Treadgold 1997, pp. 94–95.
  41. Kaldellis 2023, p. 200; Treadgold 1997, p. 209.
  42. Greatrex 2008.
  43. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 209; Greatrex 2008, pp. 243; Treadgold 1997, pp. 153.
  44. Greatrex 2008, pp. 244; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 214; Treadgold 1997, pp. 158–159.
  45. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 243–245.
  46. Greatrex 2008, p. 244; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 220; Treadgold 1997, pp. 162, 164.
  47. Greatrex 2008, p. 244; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 220; Treadgold 1997, pp. 164.
  48. Greatrex 2008, p. 244; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 224.
  49. Treadgold 1997, p. 172.
  50. Haldon 2008a, p. 250.
  51. Louth 2009a, pp. 108–109; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 269–271; Treadgold 1997, pp. 179.
  52. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 272; Louth 2009a, pp. 116; Treadgold 1997, pp. 80.
  53. Louth 2009a, pp. 111, 120; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 274–276.
  54. Haldon 2008a, p. 252.
  55. Kaldellis 2023, p. 281; Moorhead 2009, p. 202.
  56. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 306; Moorhead 2009, p. 209; Haldon 2008a, p. 253.
  57. Kaldellis 2023, p. 297.
  58. Kaldellis 2023, p. 297; Treadgold 1997, pp. 193–194; Haldon 2008a, pp. 252–253.
  59. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 300–301.
  60. Kaldellis 2023, p. 305.
  61. Treadgold 1997, pp. 197–198, 201; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 298, 305–306.
  62. Treadgold 1997, pp. 210–211, 214; Louth 2009a, pp. 117–118; Haldon 2008a, p. 253.
  63. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 318–319; Treadgold 1997, p. 217.
  64. 64.0 64.1 Haldon 2008a, p. 254.
  65. Haldon 2008a, p. 254; Treadgold 1997.
  66. Haldon 2008a, p. 254; Treadgold 1997, pp. 220–221.
  67. Louth 2009a, pp. 126–127; Haldon 2008a, p. 254; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 336.
  68. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 336–338; Treadgold 1997, pp. 234–235; Haldon 2008a, p. 254.
  69. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 347-348; Louth 2009b, pp. 226.
  70. Kaldellis 2023, p. 348.
  71. Haldon 2008a, p. 254; Louth 2009b, pp. 226.
  72. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 349; Treadgold 1997, p. 241.
  73. Haldon 2008a, pp. 254–255; Treadgold 1997, pp. 290-293; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 352, 355-356, 360.
  74. Haldon 2008a, pp. 254–255.
  75. Haldon 2008a, p. 255.
  76. Treadgold 1997, p. 398.
  77. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 365-366; Louth 2009b, pp. 227–229.
  78. Louth 2009b, p. 229; Kaldellis 2023, p. 372.
  79. Kaldellis 2023, p. 375; Haldon 2008a, p. 256; Louth 2009b, pp. 229–230.
  80. Kaldellis 2023, p. 387; Haldon 2008a, p. 256.
  81. 81.0 81.1 Kaldellis 2023, p. 387.
  82. Haldon 2008a, p. 257; Kaldellis 2023, p. 387.
  83. Kaldellis 2023, p. 389.
  84. Louth 2009b, pp. 230–231.
  85. Treadgold 1997, pp. 315–316; Louth 2009b, pp. 239–240.
  86. Treadgold 1997, pp. 323–327; Haldon 2008a, p. 258; Louth 2009b, pp. 233.
  87. Kaldellis 2023, p. 403; Haldon 2008a, pp. 257–258; Louth 2009b, pp. 233.
  88. Louth 2009b, p. 235.
  89. Kaldellis 2023, p. 403.
  90. Haldon 2008a, p. 257; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 438–440; Auzépy 2009, p. 265.
  91. Haldon 2008a, p. 257.
  92. Haldon 2008a, p. 257; Auzépy 2009, p. 265.
  93. Haldon 2008a, pp. 258–259; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 443.
  94. Haldon 2008a, pp. 257; Auzépy 2009, pp. 255.
  95. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 450-451; Auzépy 2009, pp. 255, 258-259.
  96. Haldon 2008a, p. 259.
  97. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 444–445; Auzépy 2009, pp. 275–276.
  98. Auzépy 2009.
  99. Auzépy 2009, pp. 265-269; Kaegi 2009, pp. 386; Kaldellis 2023, p. 450.
  100. Haldon 2008a, p. 260; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 450-451, 453-454.
  101. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 443, 447–449; Haldon 2008a, pp. 258, 260–261; Auzépy 2009, pp. 253–254.
  102. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 459–561; Auzépy 2009, pp. 284–287.
  103. Haldon 2008a, p. 261; Treadgold 2002, pp. 141–142; Magdalino 2002, p. 170.
  104. Haldon 2008a, p. 261; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 464–469.
  105. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 470–473; Magdalino 2002, pp. 169–171; Haldon 2008a, p. 261.
  106. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 473–474, 478–481.
  107. Holmes 2008, p. 265; Auzépy 2009, pp. 257, 259, 289; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 482–483, 485–491.
  108. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 491–495; Holmes 2008, p. 265; Auzépy 2009, pp. 273–274.
  109. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 498–501; Holmes 2008, p. 266.
  110. Holmes 2008, pp. 265–266; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 504–505; Auzépy 2009, p. 254; Tougher 2009, pp. 292–293, 296.
  111. Tougher 2009, pp. 292, 296; Holmes 2008, p. 266.
  112. Holmes 2008, p. 266; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 522–524; Treadgold 1997, pp. 455–458.
  113. Tougher 2009, p. 296; Kaldellis 2023, p. 526.
  114. Shepard 2009b, pp. 493, 496–498; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 429–433; Holmes 2008, p. 267.
  115. Holmes 2008, p. 267; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 534–535.
  116. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 537–539; Holmes 2008, p. 267; Shepard 2009b, p. 503.
  117. Shepard 2009b, p. 505; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 540–543; Holmes 2008, p. 267.
  118. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 543–544; Shepard 2009b, pp. 505–507.
  119. Shepard 2009b, pp. 508–509; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 546–552; Holmes 2008, p. 268.
  120. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 553–555; Holmes 2008, p. 268.
  121. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 563–573; Holmes 2008, pp. 268–269; Magdalino 2002, p. 176.
  122. Holmes 2008, p. 268.
  123. Shepard 2009b, pp. 522–526; Magdalino 2002, p. 202; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 573–578.
  124. Shepard 2009b, pp. 526, 531; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 578–579; Holmes 2008, p. 269.
  125. Holmes 2008, p. 269; Shepard 2009b, pp. 526–29; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 579–582.
  126. Shepard 2009b, p. 529; Holmes 2008, p. 271.
  127. Kaldellis 2023, p. 584; Holmes 2008, pp. 270–271; Magdalino 2002, p. 180.
  128. Shepard 2009b, pp. 531–536; Holmes 2008, p. 271.
  129. Magdalino 2002, pp. 202–203; Holmes 2008, pp. 271–272; Angold 2009, pp. 587–588; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 588–589.
  130. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 590, 593; Magdalino 2002, pp. 181–182; Angold 2009, pp. 587–598.
  131. Kaldellis 2023, p. 602.
  132. Holmes 2008, pp. 272–273; Magdalino 2002, p. 182; Kaldellis 2023, p. 636.
  133. Holmes 2008, p. 273; Magdalino 2002, pp. 184–185, 189.
  134. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 629–637; Angold 2009, pp. 609–610.
  135. Holmes 2008, pp. 273–274; Angold 2009, p. 611.
  136. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 639–642; Holmes 2008, p. 275; Magdalino 2002, p. 190.
  137. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 642–644; Holmes 2008, p. 275; Angold 2009, pp. 611–612.
  138. Holmes 2008, p. 275; Magdalino 2002, p. 190; Angold 2009, pp. 621–623.
  139. Holmes 2008, pp. 274–275; Angold 2009, pp. 612–613, 619–621, 623–625; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 645–647, 659–663.
  140. Holmes 2008, p. 274; Magdalino 2009, pp. 629–630.
  141. Holmes 2008, p. 275; Magdalino 2009, pp. 631–633; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 664–670.
  142. Kaldellis 2023, p. 669; Holmes 2008, p. 275.
  143. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 670, 676–677; Magdalino 2009, pp. 644–646.
  144. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 678, 683–688; Holmes 2008, pp. 275–276.
  145. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 679–681; Magdalino 2009, pp. 637–638.
  146. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 682–683; Magdalino 2002, p. 194; Magdalino 2009, pp. 638–641.
  147. Magdalino 2009, pp. 643–644; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 692–693.
  148. Kaldellis 2023, p. 695.
  149. Magdalino 2002, p. 194; Holmes 2008, p. 276.
  150. Holmes 2008, p. 276; Magdalino 2002, pp. 194–195; Magdalino 2009, p. 655.
  151. Magdalino 2002, pp. 195–196; Magdalino 2009, pp. 648–651; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 706–710.
  152. Holmes 2008, p. 276.
  153. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 718–720; Magdalino 2009, pp. 651–652.
  154. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 720–724; Magdalino 2009, pp. 652–653.
  155. 155.0 155.1 Laiou 2008, p. 280; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 733–734; Reinert 2002, pp. 250–253; Angold 2009b, p. 731.
  156. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 755–758; Angold 2009b, p. 737.
  157. Laiou 2008, p. 283; Reinert 2002, p. 254; Angold 2009b, pp. 737–738; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 766–770.
  158. Reinert 2002, p. 253; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 760–762.
  159. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 771; Laiou 2008, pp. 282–283.
  160. Angold 2009b, p. 740; Laiou 2008, pp. 282–283; Kaldellis 2023, p. 772.
  161. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 774–781; Reinert 2002, p. 254.
  162. Laiou 2008, p. 283; Reinert 2002, p. 254.
  163. Reinert 2002, pp. 256–257; Laiou 2008, p. 286.
  164. Reinert 2002, pp. 257–258; Laiou 2009, pp. 803–804.
  165. Reinert 2002, pp. 258; Laiou 2008, p. 287.
  166. Laiou 2008, pp. 287–288; Reinert 2002, pp. 260–263; Kaldellis 2023, p. 847.
  167. Laiou 2008, pp. 289–290; Reinert 2002, pp. 265–268.
  168. Laiou 2008, p. 291.
  169. Laiou 2008, p. 291; Reinert 2002, pp. 268–269.
  170. Laiou 2009, p. 829.
  171. Reinert 2002, pp. 273–274; Laiou 2009, pp. 831–832; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 887–889.
  172. Reinert 2002, pp. 274–276; Laiou 2008, p. 292; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 892–894.
  173. Reinert 2002, p. 276.
  174. Reinert 2002, pp. 278–279; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 903–908.
  175. Reinert 2002, pp. 280–283; Laiou 2008, pp. 292–293; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 910–914.
  176. Louth 2005, pp. 306–308; Treadgold 1997b, pp. 82–83.
  177. Browning 1992, p. 98; Stewart 2022, pp. 10-11.
  178. Kaldellis 2023, p. 35; Howard-Johnston 2024, p. 8; Browning 1992, p. 98.
  179. Browning 1992, p. 98; Kaldellis 2023, p. 185.
  180. Browning 1992, p. 98; Howard-Johnston 2024, p. 67; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 397, 407–409.
  181. Louth 2005, p. 303; Treadgold 1997b, pp. 430–431; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 418, 421.
  182. Kaldellis 2023, p. 168; Stein 1999, pp. 14, 16, 28; Kaiser 2015, p. 120.
  183. Gregory 2010, p. 135; Stein 1999, pp. 33–35; Dingledy 2019, pp. 2–14; Kaiser 2015, pp. 123–126.
  184. Stein 1999, p. 8; Merryman & Pérez-Perdomo 2007, p. 21.
  185. Stolte 2015, pp. 356, 370; Stolte 2018, pp. 231–232.
  186. Chitwood 2017, p. 23.
  187. Chitwood 2017, p. 185.
  188. Chitwood 2017, p. 185; Nicol 1988, p. 65.
  189. Chitwood 2017, pp. 23, 132, 364.
  190. Browning 1992, p. 97; Kaldellis 2023, p. 529; Chitwood 2017, pp. 25–32, 44.
  191. Browning 1992, pp. 97–98; Chitwood 2017, pp. 32–35; Kaldellis 2023, p. 529.
  192. Stein 1999, p. 35.
  193. Papaconstantinou 2016, p. xxxii; Cameron 2016, p. 31; Cameron 2006b, pp. 544-551; Drake 2007, pp. 418, 422; Greatrex 2008, p. 236.
  194. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 141, 186, 342.
  195. Brown 1976, p. 8; Löhr 2007, p. 9.
  196. Kaldellis 2023, p. 390; Cameron 2017.
  197. Berndt & Steinacher 2014, pp. 1-2, 8-19; Löhr 2007, p. 14.
  198. Sabo 2018, pp. vi, 9; Löhr 2007, pp. 14–23.
  199. Adams 2021, p. 366; Micheau 2006, pp. 373, 375.
  200. Micheau 2006, pp. 373-374, 376.
  201. Nicholson 1960, pp. 54, 60; Casiday & Norris 2007a, p. 3.
  202. Louth 2008, p. 47; Kolbaba 2008, pp. 214-215.
  203. Kolbaba 2008, pp. 213–215, 218-221.
  204. Meyendorff 1979, pp. 95,97 101; Kolbaba 2008, p. 223.
  205. Brown 2008, p. 13; Kolbaba 2008, p. 223.
  206. Treadgold 1995, pp. 63–64, 206; Haldon 1999, p. 67.
  207. Treadgold 1995, pp. 63, 204; Haldon 1999, p. 67; Decker 2013, p. 71.
  208. Haldon 1999, p. 68.
  209. Treadgold 1995, pp. 63–64; Haldon 1999, pp. 68–69; Haldon 2008b, p. 554.
  210. Haldon 1999, p. 74; Decker 2013, p. 74.
  211. Treadgold 1995, p. 23; Haldon 2008b, pp. 554–555.
  212. Haldon 2008b, pp. 555–556; Kaldellis 2021a, p. 463.
  213. Haldon 1999, p. 74; Haldon 2008b, p. 559.
  214. Decker 2013, pp. 207–208, 222–224; Kaldellis 2021a, p. 463; Howard-Johnston 2008, p. 947.
  215. Kaldellis 2021a, p. 463; Treadgold 1995, pp. 25, 209; Decker 2013, pp. 77–78.
  216. Haldon 1999, p. 92; Decker 2013, pp. 78–82.
  217. Haldon 2008b, p. 556.
  218. Treadgold 1995, p. 67; Kaldellis 2021a, p. 463; Kaldellis 2023, p. 562.
  219. Haldon 2008b, p. 557; Treadgold 1995, pp. 214–218.
  220. Haldon 2008b, p. 560.
  221. Haldon 2008b, p. 557; Kaldellis 2021a, p. 464; Bartusis 1997, pp. 5–6.
  222. Haldon 2008b, p. 557; Bartusis 1997, pp. 5–7; Decker 2013, p. 82.
  223. Haldon 2008b, pp. 557–558; Decker 2013, pp. 82–83.
  224. Haldon 2008b, pp. 558–560; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 812, 860–861.
  225. Decker 2013, p. 40; Haldon 2008b, p. 559.
  226. Howard-Johnston 2008, p. 940; Kaldellis 2021a, p. 463.
  227. Haldon 1999, p. 278; Decker 2013, p. 130; Kaldellis 2021a, p. 465.
  228. Decker 2013, p. 130, 135–137; Kazhdan 1990, pp. 15–17.
  229. Kazhdan 1990, pp. 10–11; Decker 2013, p. 129.
  230. Kazhdan 1990, pp. 11–15, 18–21.
  231. Howard-Johnston 2008, p. 945; Kazhdan 1990, pp. 20–21; Bartusis 1997, p. 348; Kaldellis 2021a, p. 466.
  232. Stewart 2022, pp. 2-7, 10; Muthesius 2022, pp. 81, 96; Kaldellis 2022b, pp. 248, 258; Pohl 2018, p. 20; Stouraitis 2018, pp. 125-127.
  233. Treadgold 1997b, pp. 197, 384–385; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 21–22; Stathakopoulos 2008, p. 310.
  234. Stathakopoulos 2008, p. 312; Treadgold 1997b, pp. 931–932.
  235. Stathakopoulos 2008, p. 313; Treadgold 1997b, p. 1112.
  236. Stathakopoulos 2008, pp. 310, 314; Stathakopoulos 2023, p. 31; Kaldellis 2023, p. 21.
  237. Bryer 2008, p. 673.
  238. Ash 1995, pp. 244-245.
  239. Ash 1995, p. 244; Decker 2008, p. 496.
  240. Faas 2005, pp. 184–185; Bryer 2008, p. 671; Ash 1995, p. 233; Vryonis 1971, p. 482.
  241. Davidson 2014, p. 123.
  242. Ash 1995, p. 244; Davidson 2014, p. 123; Bryer 2008, p. 671; Salaman 1986, p. 184.
  243. Bryer 2008, pp. 672-673; Unwin 2010, p. 185.
  244. Horn & Schädler 2019.
  245. Jeffreys 2008a, pp. 681-682; Kaldellis 2023, p. 13, 138.
  246. Jeffreys 2008a, p. 680.
  247. Jeffreys 2008a, pp. 678-683; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 187, 233.
  248. Kazhdan 1991a, p. 2137, "Tzykanisterion"; Kazanaki-Lappa 2002, p. 643; Jeffreys 2008a, p. 683; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 672, 844.
  249. Jeffreys 2008a, p. 683.
  250. Horrocks 2008, p. 778.
  251. Horrocks 2010, p. 208; Rochette 2023, pp. 282–283.
  252. Horrocks 2008, p. 778; Rochette 2023, pp. 283–284.
  253. Horrocks 2010, pp. 208–209.
  254. Horrocks 2008, pp. 778–779; Horrocks 2010, pp. 207–210.
  255. Treadgold 2002, p. 142.
  256. Browning 1982, p. 51.
  257. Browning 1982, p. 51; Horrocks 2008, pp. 781–782.
  258. Horrocks 2008, p. 783; Horrocks 2010, pp. 216–218; Jeffreys & Mango 2002, pp. 298–300.
  259. Browning 1982, pp. 51–52; Jeffreys & Mango 2002, p. 299.
  260. Whittow 2009, p. 473; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 13.
  261. Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 24.
  262. Whittow 2009, p. 467; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 246.
  263. Whittow 2009, pp. 472, 474, 479; Laiou 2002c, p. 698; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 24.
  264. Laiou 2002a, p. 177; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 25-26.
  265. Whittow 2009, p. 465, 471; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 25-26, 232.
  266. Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 44-46.
  267. Whittow 2009, pp. 473-474; Laiou 2002a, pp. 269-270.
  268. Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 19-22, 24.
  269. Whittow 2009, p. 476; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 90-92.
  270. Whittow 2009, pp. 473-476; Laiou 2002a, pp. 25, 402.
  271. Laiou 2002a, p. 23; Laiou 2002b, p. 1164; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 233.
  272. Magdalino 2002b, p. 535.
  273. Kaldellis 2023, p. 739; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 167-168.
  274. Matschke 2002, pp. 805–806.
  275. Whittow 2009, p. 477; Matschke 2002, pp. 771-772; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 203.
  276. Matschke 2002, p. 779; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 168.
  277. Laiou 2002c, p. 754.
  278. Whittow 2009, p. 471; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 232-235.
  279. Cormack 2018, p. 39.
  280. 280.0 280.1 280.2 James 2003, § para. 3.
  281. James 2003, § paras. 2 and 13.
  282. Rodley 1994, p. 2; Cormack 2018, pp. 11–12.
  283. Rodley 1994, pp. 12–14.
  284. Rodley 1994, p. 34; James 2003, § paras. 3–4.
  285. Rodley 1994, pp. 32–33, 56–57; Cormack 2018, p. 14.
  286. James 2003, § para. 10; Cormack 2018, pp. 33–40; Curl & Wilson 2021, § paras. 3 and 5.
  287. Rodley 1994, p. 67.
  288. James 2003, § para. 7.
  289. James 2003, § para. 4; Cormack 2018, p. 39.
  290. James 2003, § paras. 4–5.
  291. Rodley 1994, pp. 101–102; Cormack 2018, p. 2.
  292. Lowden 1997, pp. 147–148.
  293. Matthews & Platt 1997, p. 185.
  294. Rodley 1994, pp. 115–116; Lowden 1997, pp. 147–151.
  295. Rodley 1994, p. 132; Lowden 1997, pp. 187–188.
  296. James 2003, § para. 3; Cormack 2018, pp. 146–147.
  297. Curl & Wilson 2021, § para. 7.
  298. Rodley 1994, p. 166; Cormack 2018, pp. 159, 186; Andronikou 2022, pp. 2–4.
  299. 299.0 299.1 299.2 Browning 2022, § para. 1.
  300. Papaioannou 2021a, pp. 1–2, 5–7.
  301. Browning 1991a.
  302. Papaioannou 2021a, p. 10.
  303. Kazhdan 1999, p. 1; van Dieten 1980, pp. 101–105.
  304. Browning 2022, § paras. 1–2; Kaldellis 2021, pp. 162–163.
  305. 305.0 305.1 305.2 305.3 305.4 305.5 Kazhdan 1991b, p. 1236.
  306. Martín 2021, p. 685.
  307. Kazhdan 1991b, pp. 1236–1237.
  308. 308.0 308.1 Kazhdan 1991b, p. 1237.
  309. Ring 1994, p. 318.
  310. Velimirović 1990, pp. 28–29; Conomos 1991, p. 1426.
  311. Conomos 1991, pp. 1424–1426; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, § Introduction.
  312. Velimirović 1990, pp. 26–27, 29.
  313. Velimirović 1990, pp. 45–46; Conomos 1991, p. 1425; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §5 "System of eight modes ('oktōēchos')", §7 "Formulaic chants".
  314. Velimirović 1990, p. 29; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §7 "Formulaic chants".
  315. Velimirović 1990, pp. 26–27.
  316. Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §10 "Syllabic hymn settings".
  317. Velimirović 1990, pp. 48–51; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §3 "Melodic notation".
  318. Conomos 1991, p. 1425; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §3 "Melodic notation"; Mellas 2020, p. 2.
  319. Conomos 1991, pp. 1425–1426.
  320. Touliatos 2001, § Introduction.
  321. Touliatos 2001, § "Sources".
  322. Conomos & Kazhdan 1991, p. 1426.
  323. 323.0 323.1 Conomos & Kazhdan 1991, p. 1426; Touliatos 2001, §2 "Instruments and performing practice".
  324. Touliatos 2001, §3 "Genres and composers".
  325. Robins 1993, pp. 8-9; Lazaris 2020a, p. 17; Telelis 2020, p. 186.
  326. Lazaris 2020a, pp. 3, 11; Inglebert 2020, p. 27; Tatakes & Moutafakis 2003, p. 180.
  327. Mango 2008, p. 958; Nicolaidis et al. 2016, pp. 544–545.
  328. 328.0 328.1 Tihon 2013, p. 206.
  329. Lazaris 2020a, pp. 1–5.
  330. Manolova 2020, p. 66.
  331. Manolova 2020, p. 66; Jones 2005, p. 520-521.
  332. Wildberg 2018; Lindberg 1992, p. 162.
  333. Lazaris 2020a, p. 16; Salmon 2020, pp. 445-446; Partington 1999, p. 13.
  334. Lindberg 1992, p. 349; Nutton 1984, p. 9; Miller 1997, pp. ix, 3–4; Bennett 2016, pp. 7-14.
  335. Kaldellis 2023, p. 914; Nicol 1993, pp. 407-408; Bryer 2009, p. 856.
  336. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 914–915; Bryer 2009, p. 869; Papademetriou 2015, p. 52.
  337. Seton-Watson 1967, p. 31; Kaldellis 2023, p. 901; Mango 2008, pp. 960-961.
  338. Clark 2000, p. 215.
  339. Kaldellis 2023, p. 915; Treadgold 1997b, p. 1125.
  340. Ivanova & Anderson 2024, p. 1240; Kaldellis 2022b, p. 360.
  341. Ivanova & Anderson 2024, pp. 1233, 1235, 1248; Aschenbrenner & Ransohoff 2022b, p. 372; Kaldellis 2022b, p. 352.
  342. Ivanova & Anderson 2024, pp. 1229-41, 1234, 1238; Haarer 2010, pp. 18–19.
  343. Ivanova & Anderson 2024, p. 1248; Haarer 2010, pp. 10-12; Goldwyn 2022, p. 325.
  344. Ivanova & Anderson 2024, p. 1248; Haarer 2010, p. 18-19; Stewart 2022, p. 3; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 2-3; Cameron 2010, pp. 177-178.
  345. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 3-4; Cameron 2010, p. 175.
  346. Mango 2008, pp. 958-959; Obolensky 1994, p. 3.
  347. Stolte 2015, pp. 10–11; Merryman & Pérez-Perdomo 2007, pp. 367–368; Stein 1999, p. 36.
  348. Salogubova & Zenkov 2018.
  349. Cameron 2010, p. 165; Mango 2008, p. 960.
  350. Poppe 1991, p. 25; Cameron 2010, p. 261; Mango 2008, p. 358.
  351. Poppe 1991, p. 25; Ivanič 2016, p. 127; Mango 2008, pp. 959, 961.
  352. Poppe 1991, p. 25; Ivanič 2016, p. 127; Cameron 2010, p. 165; Shepard 2006, pp. 7–8.

Bibliography[edit | edit source]

Books[edit | edit source]

Journals[edit | edit source]

Book chapters and encyclopaedias[edit | edit source]

Further reading[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Byzantine Empire topics

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Portal/images/a' not found.