Created by WikiDwarf
Last edited September 23, 2025
Add new article
minor update
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Rajput caste in India and Pakistan}}
{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
{{pp|small=yes}}
{{Short description|Sindhi tribe in India and Pakistan}}
{{about|the tribe|the dynasty established by the tribe|Soomra dynasty|other uses|Soomro (disambiguation)}}
{{about|the tribe|the dynasty established by the tribe|Soomra dynasty|other uses|Soomro (disambiguation)}}
{{Infobox ethnic group|
{{infobox caste
| group            = '''Soomro'''
| caste_name            = Soomro
| image           =  
| caste_name_in_local    =  
| poptime          =  
| image                 =
| popplace        = [[Sindh]] <small>([[Pakistan]])</small>, [[India]]
| image_size            =
| langs            = [[Sindhi language|Sindhi]], [[Saraiki language|Saraiki]], [[Punjabi language|Punjabi]]
| alt                    =
| related          = [[Sindhi people|Sindhi]]s
| caption                =
| native_name      =  
| abbreviation          =
| native_name_lang =  
| varna                  =
| gotra                  =
| religions              = [[File:Star and Crescent.svg|16px]] [[Islam]]
| languages              = [[Sindhi language|Sindhi]], [[Gujarati language|Gujarati]], [[Punjabi language|Punjabi]].
| country                = {{Flag|Pakistan}}, {{Flag|India}}
| region                = [[Sindh region|Sindh]], [[Gujarat]], [[Rajasthan]], [[Punjab region|Punjab]].
| ethnicity              =[[Sindhi people|Sindhi]]
| India_migration        =
| population            =
| family_names          =  
| feudal_title          =[[Raja]], [[Rana (title)|Rana]]
| heraldic_title        =
| lineage                =
| subdivisions          =
| related                =
}}
}}
'''Soomro''' ({{lang-sd|{{Naskh|سومرو}}}}, ([[Devanagari]]): सूमरो), '''Soomra,''' '''Sumrah''' or '''Sumra''' is a clan having a local origin in [[Sindh]] who are considered to belong to [[Rajput]] tribe.<ref name="Wink 2002 166">{{Cite book |last=Wink |first=André |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g2m7_R5P2oAC&q=al+hind+andre+wink |title=Al-Hind, the Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7Th-11th Centuries |date=2002 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-0-391-04173-8 |pages=166 |language=en|quote= In Lower Sind however we become dimly aware of the existence in the eighth and ninth centuries of a tribal people, the Sumras, who shortly after the death of Mahmud of Ghazna became quasi-independent rulers throughout the Multan region, even when it remained nominally incorporated in the Ghaznavid and Ghurid dominion and subsequently in the Delhi Sultanate. The Sumras were a dynasty of local origin, later claiming to be Rajputs as well as Arabs, and are clearly distinguishable from the pastoral-nomadic Jats or Mids. In fact, it could very well be that next to the Baluchi immigration from the west, the rise of the Sumras was a factor in pushing the Jats of Lower Sind northward.}}</ref> They are found in Sindh, parts of [[Punjab region|Punjab]] especially bordering Sindh, [[Balochistan, Pakistan|Balochistan]] province, and the [[Kutch district]] of the Indian state of [[Gujarat]] and also [[Rajasthan]].<ref name="Journal">{{cite journal |title=The Arab Conquest |journal=International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics |date=2007 |volume=36 |issue=1 |page=91 |quote=The Soomras are believed to be Parmar Rajputs found even today in Rajasthan, Saurashtra, Kutch and Sindh. The Cambridge History of India refers to the Soomras as "a Rajput dynasty the later members of which accepted Islam" (p. 54 ).}}</ref><ref name="Siddiqui"/><ref name="sen2">{{Cite book |last=Sen |first=Sailendra |title=A Textbook of Medieval Indian History |publisher=Primus Books |year=2013 |isbn=978-9-38060-734-4 |pages=114}}</ref>  
'''Soomro''' ([[Sindhi language|Sindhi]]: {{Naskh|سومرو}}, [[Devanagari]]: सूमरो), '''Soomra,''' '''Sumrah''' or '''Sumra''' is a tribe having a local origin in [[Sindh]], [[Pakistan]]. They are found in [[Sindh]], parts of [[Punjab region|Punjab]] especially bordering Sindh, [[Balochistan, Pakistan|Balochistan]] province, and the [[Kutch district]] of the Indian state of [[Gujarat]] and also [[Rajasthan]].<ref name="Journal">{{cite journal |title=The Arab Conquest |journal=International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics |date=2007 |volume=36 |issue=1 |page=91 |quote=The Soomras are believed to be Parmar Rajputs found even today in Rajasthan, Saurashtra, Kutch and Sindh. The Cambridge History of India refers to the Soomras as "a Rajput dynasty the later members of which accepted Islam" (p. 54 ).}}</ref><ref name="Siddiqui"/><ref name="sen2">{{Cite book |last=Sen |first=Sailendra |title=A Textbook of Medieval Indian History |publisher=Primus Books |year=2013 |isbn=978-9-38060-734-4 |pages=114}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Kumari |first=Ashok Pratap Singh& Patiraj |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MHNsxbiEM4UC&dq=Global+Encyclopedic+Ethnography+Of+Indian+Muslim&pg=PT4 |title=Psychological Implications in Industrial Performance |date=2007 |publisher=Global Vision Publishing House |isbn=978-81-8220-200-9 |pages=795–799 |language=en}}</ref>  The Soomras ruled throughout the [[Sindh]] and [[Multan]] regions.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wink |first1=André |title=Al-Hind, Volume 2 Slave Kings and the Islamic Conquest, 11th-13th Centuries |chapter=Garrison, Plain and March |date=1 January 2002 |volume=2 |pages=243–246 |doi=10.1163/9789004483019_012 |url=https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004483019_012 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-48301-9 |language=en|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


The Soomro tribe established the [[Soomra dynasty]] in 1025 CE, which re-established native Sindhi rule over Sindh since the [[Arab]] conquests.<ref name="Journal"/> Many members of the Soomro caste were one of the first in [[Sindh]] to convert to [[Islam]] from [[Hinduism]] but initially continued to maintain several Hindu customs and traditions.<ref name="Siddiqui">{{cite journal |last=Siddiqui |first=Habibullah |title=The Soomras of Sindh: their origin, main characteristics and rule – an overview (general survey) (1025 – 1351 AD) |url=http://www.uok.edu.pk/faculties/sindhi/docs/soomroEng.pdf |journal=Literary Conference on Soomra Period in Sindh |quote=}}</ref><ref name="Journal" />
The Soomro tribe established the [[Soomra dynasty]] in 1025 CE, which re-established native Sindhi rule over Sindh following the [[Arab conquest of Sindh|Arab conquests]].<ref name="Journal"/> Many members of the Soomro tribe were among the first in [[Sindh]] to convert to [[Islam]] from [[Hinduism]] but initially continued to maintain several Hindu customs and traditions.<ref name="Siddiqui">{{cite journal |last=Siddiqui |first=Habibullah |title=The Soomras of Sindh: their origin, main characteristics and rule – an overview (general survey) (1025 – 1351 AD) |url=http://www.uok.edu.pk/faculties/sindhi/docs/soomroEng.pdf |journal=Literary Conference on Soomra Period in Sindh |quote=}}</ref><ref name="Journal" />


== Origins ==
== Origins ==
Many authors have presented conflicting accounts of Soomro's origins. Some say their origins to be of [[Rajput]]s who migrated to Sindh from [[Rajasthan]]<ref name="Siddiqui" /> by linking them to the [[Parmar]] clan of Rajputs.<ref name="Journal" /><ref name="Siddiqui" /> Others like Ahmad Hasan Dani claims that "of this there is no definite proof" though he too affirms that they originate in the [[Indian subcontinent]].<ref name=":4">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D_xtAAAAMAAJ&q=soomra+dynasty|title=History of Pakistan: Pakistan through ages|last=Dani|first=Ahmad Hasan|date=2007|publisher=Sang-e Meel Publications|isbn=978-969-35-2020-0|language=en|quote=But as many kings of the dynasty bore local names, it is almost certain that the Soomras were of local origin. Sometimes they are connected with Paramara Rajputs, but of this there is no definite proof.}}</ref> M. H. Panhwar, a Sindhologist, also rejects a Rajput origin and attributes its to James Todd but still accepts native origin.<ref name="Panhwar Soomra National Council (Pakistan) 2003">{{cite book | last=Panhwar | first=M.H. | author2=Soomra National Council (Pakistan) | title=An Illustrated Historical Atlas of Soomra Kingdom of Sindh: 1011-1351 AD | publisher=Soomra National Council, Pakistan | year=2003 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-BtuAAAAMAAJ | access-date=2022-07-27 | page= 26 (on pdf) |quote= “Presence of Soomras in Kutch, Gujarat and Rajasthan in small numbers does not make them Rajputs either… All British period historians given in the table at end of this chapter have called Soomras as Rajputs under influence of Todd's writings. Actually they were local converted to Ismailism.”}}</ref> Some writers have detailed about a subdivision in [[Jats]] with the name "Sumra".<ref name="Khan Choonara 2004 p.130">{{cite book | last1=Khan | first1=H.A. | last2=Choonara | first2=S. | title=Re-Thinking Punjab: The Construction of Siraiki Identity | publisher=Research and Publication Centre (RPC), National College of Arts | year=2004 | isbn=978-969-8623-09-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nV71AwAAQBAJ | access-date=2022-07-27 | page=130 | quote= Other important braches and sub-divisions of the Jat in the Siraiki area include Panhwar, Parihar, Chajra, Daha, Jhakkar, Joiya, Guraha, Bhatti, Massan, Bhutta, Sahu, Sial, Jangla, Thind, Samtia, Sehar, Sumra…}}</ref><ref name="Bhatia 1987 p.24">{{cite book | last=Bhatia | first=S. | title=Social Change and Politics in Punjab, 1898-1910 | publisher=Enkay Publishers | year=1987 | isbn=978-81-85148-13-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qnVuAAAAMAAJ | access-date=2022-07-29 | page=24 |quote= The Jats were divided into several tribes . In the Western plain ( i.e. , West of Lahore ) excluding the salt range , and sub - montane tracts were to be found the Tahim , Butta , Langah , Sumra , Sipra and Hans}}</ref> But Historian [[André Wink]] has mentioned that the Soomras were not Jats.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wink |first=André |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bCVyhH5VDjAC&dq=samma+andre+wink&pg=PA159 |title=Al-hind: The Making of the Indo-islamic World |date=1991 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-09249-5 |pages=159 |language=en|quote=The Sammas rose to great power in Sind at about 1351 A.D., displacing the Sumras, who were not Jats and had achieved control of Lower Sind shortly after the death of Mahmud of Ghazna.}}</ref>
Many authors have presented conflicting accounts of Soomro's origins. [[Michel Boivin]] adds that:
{{Blockquote|The Sūmras are believed to be [[Sodha]] [[Rajputs]] who embraced Islam through Ismāʿilī influence. After conversion, they adopted the name Sūmra.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Boivin |first1=Michel |title=Indigenous People of Sindh |journal=Brill's Encyclopedia of the Religions of the Indigenous People of South Asia Online |date=16 September 2021 |url=https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-encyclopedia-of-the-religions-of-the-indigenous-people-of-south-asia-online/*-COM_033382#d24437846e749 |publisher=Brill |language=en |quote=..These episodes reflect the rivalry among different Rājpūt clans, especially after some converted to Islam. The Sūmras are among these, as they are said to be Soḍhā Rājpūts who converted to Islam under Ismāʿilī persuasion; after conversion, they changed their name from Soḍhā to Sūmra..}}</ref>}} Maulai Shedai, a local researcher, believes Soomra are [[Parmar (Rajput clan)|Parmar]] [[Rajputs]].<ref name="Journal" /><ref name="Siddiqui" /> But Ahmad Hasan Dani claims "of this there is no definite proof" and adds that it is almost certain the tribe has local origins as the kings bore local names.<ref name=":4">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D_xtAAAAMAAJ&q=soomra+dynasty|title=History of Pakistan: Pakistan through ages|last=Dani|first=Ahmad Hasan|date=2007|publisher=Sang-e Meel Publications|isbn=978-969-35-2020-0|language=en|quote=But as many kings of the dynasty bore local names, it is almost certain that the Soomras were of local origin. Sometimes they are connected with Paramara Rajputs, but of this there is no definite proof.}}</ref> M. H. Panhwar, a Sindhologist, also rejects a Rajput origin and attributes its to James Todd but still accepts native origin.<ref name="Panhwar Soomra National Council (Pakistan) 2003">{{cite book | last=Panhwar | first=M.H. | author2=Soomra National Council (Pakistan) | title=An Illustrated Historical Atlas of Soomra Kingdom of Sindh: 1011-1351 AD | publisher=Soomra National Council, Pakistan | year=2003 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-BtuAAAAMAAJ | access-date=2022-07-27 | page= 26 (on pdf) |quote= “Presence of Soomras in Kutch, Gujarat and Rajasthan in small numbers does not make them Rajputs either… All British period historians given in the table at end of this chapter have called Soomras as Rajputs under influence of Todd's writings. Actually they were local converted to Ismailism.”}}</ref> Some writers have detailed about a subdivision in [[Jats]] with the name "Sumra".<ref name="Khan Choonara 2004 p.130">{{cite book | last1=Khan | first1=H.A. | last2=Choonara | first2=S. | title=Re-Thinking Punjab: The Construction of Siraiki Identity | publisher=Research and Publication Centre (RPC), National College of Arts | year=2004 | isbn=978-969-8623-09-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nV71AwAAQBAJ | access-date=2022-07-27 | page=130 | quote= Other important braches and sub-divisions of the Jat in the Siraiki area include Panhwar, Parihar, Chajra, Daha, Jhakkar, Joiya, Guraha, Bhatti, Massan, Bhutta, Sahu, Sial, Jangla, Thind, Samtia, Sehar, Sumra…}}</ref><ref name="Bhatia 1987 p.24">{{cite book | last=Bhatia | first=S. | title=Social Change and Politics in Punjab, 1898-1910 | publisher=Enkay Publishers | year=1987 | isbn=978-81-85148-13-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qnVuAAAAMAAJ | access-date=2022-07-29 | page=24 |quote= The Jats were divided into several tribes. In the Western plain (i.e., West of Lahore) excluding the salt range, and sub - montane tracts were to be found the Tahim, Butta, Langah, Sumra, Sipra and Hans}}</ref> But Historian [[André Wink]] has mentioned that the Soomras were not Jats.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wink |first=André |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bCVyhH5VDjAC&dq=samma+andre+wink&pg=PA159 |title=Al-hind: The Making of the Indo-islamic World |date=1991 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-09249-5 |pages=159 |language=en|quote=The Sammas rose to great power in Sind at about 1351 A.D., displacing the Sumras, who were not Jats and had achieved control of Lower Sind shortly after the death of Mahmud of Ghazna.}}</ref>


He has also explained that Soomras who were of local Sindhi origin and had been semi-independent rulers after the death of [[Mahmud of Ghazni]] were different to pastoral-nomadic [[Jats]] or [[Med people|Meds]]. As per him, rise of Soomras was one of the factor in movement of the Jats of lower Sindh towards north.<ref name="Wink 2002 166"/> Ghulam Hussain and others argue that the Soomros and other native tribes indigenous to Sindh slowly began to [[Caste system among South Asian Muslims|'Ashrafize']] themselves by remaking their genealogies to further associate themselves with [[Sayyid#South Asia|Syeds]] whom they possibly intermarried and acquired power through.<ref name="Hussain pp. 24">{{cite journal | last=Hussain | first=Ghulam | title=Dalits are in India, not in Pakistan: Exploring the Discursive Bases of the Denial of Dalitness under the Ashrafia Hegemony | journal=Journal of Asian and African Studies | publisher=SAGE Publications | volume=55 | issue=1 | date=2019-08-02 | issn=0021-9096 | doi=10.1177/0021909619863455 | pages=24 | s2cid=201404746 | quote= Soomra, Samma and Kalhora indigenous castes (locally known as Sammat) were further ashrafized. After conversion to Islam they intermarried with local Arab landowners and thus had acquired great influence and power. By furnishing Tuhfa-tul-Kiram and Beglar Namah, the two books on the history, as the reference, they reconstructed their genealogies to have roots in Arabs and in association with the Sayeds. Hence, the Soomras claimed to be Sumerian Arabs; Sammas, the descendants of Jamshed Abbasi of Persia, and Kalhoras traced their descent to Abbasid Khalifas
He has also explained that Soomras who were of local Sindhi origin and had been semi-independent rulers after the death of [[Mahmud of Ghazni]] were different to pastoral-nomadic [[Jats]] or [[Med people|Meds]]. As per him, rise of Soomras was one of the factor in movement of the Jats of lower Sindh towards north.<ref name="Wink 2002 166">{{Cite book |last=Wink |first=André |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g2m7_R5P2oAC&q=al+hind+andre+wink |title=Al-Hind, the Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7Th-11th Centuries |date=2002 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-0-391-04173-8 |pages=166 |language=en |quote=In Lower Sind however we become dimly aware of the existence in the eighth and ninth centuries of a tribal people, the Sumras, who shortly after the death of [[Mahmud Ghaznavi]] became quasi-independent rulers throughout the Multan region, even when it remained nominally incorporated in the Ghaznavid and Ghurid dominion and subsequently in the Delhi Sultanate. The Sumras were a dynasty of local origin, later claiming to be Rajputs as well as [[Arabs]], and are clearly distinguishable from the pastoral-nomadic Jats or Mids. In fact, it could very well be that next to the [[Baloch people|Baluchi]] immigration from the west, the rise of the Sumras was a factor in pushing the Jats of Lower Sind northward.}}</ref> Ghulam Hussain and others argue that the Soomros and other native tribes indigenous to Sindh slowly began to [[Caste system among South Asian Muslims|'Ashrafize']] themselves by remaking their genealogies to further associate themselves with [[Sayyid#South Asia|Syeds]] whom they possibly intermarried and acquired power through.<ref name="Hussain pp. 24">{{cite journal | last=Hussain | first=Ghulam | title=Dalits are in India, not in Pakistan: Exploring the Discursive Bases of the Denial of Dalitness under the Ashrafia Hegemony | journal=Journal of Asian and African Studies | publisher=SAGE Publications | volume=55 | issue=1 | date=2019-08-02 | issn=0021-9096 | doi=10.1177/0021909619863455 | pages=24 | s2cid=201404746 | quote= Soomra, Samma and Kalhora indigenous castes (locally known as Sammat) were further ashrafized. After conversion to Islam they intermarried with local Arab landowners and thus had acquired great influence and power. By furnishing Tuhfa-tul-Kiram and Beglar Namah, the two books on the history, as the reference, they reconstructed their genealogies to have roots in Arabs and in association with the Sayeds. Hence, the Soomras claimed to be Sumerian Arabs; Sammas, the descendants of Jamshed Abbasi of Persia, and Kalhoras traced their descent to Abbasid Khalifas
}}</ref><ref name="Siddiqui" />
}}</ref><ref name="Siddiqui" />


Tarikh Waqa`i Rajisthan corroborates this viewpoint and confirms that Soomras were originally "Parmar Rajputs".<ref name="Siddiqui" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Molai |first=Rahim Dad Khan |title=Jannat Sindh - Sindhi Adabi Board Online Library (History) |url=http://www.sindhiadabiboard.org/catalogue/history/Book50/Book_page9.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220124173139/http://www.sindhiadabiboard.org/catalogue/history/Book50/Book_page9.html |archive-date=2022-01-24 |access-date=2023-01-10 |website=www.sindhiadabiboard.org}}</ref>
According to Tarikh Waqa`i Rajisthan, Soomras were [[Parmar (Rajput clan)|Parmar]] [[Rajputs]].<ref name="Siddiqui" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Molai |first=Rahim Dad Khan |title=Jannat Sindh - Sindhi Adabi Board Online Library (History) |url=http://www.sindhiadabiboard.org/catalogue/history/Book50/Book_page9.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220124173139/http://www.sindhiadabiboard.org/catalogue/history/Book50/Book_page9.html |archive-date=2022-01-24 |access-date=2023-01-10 |website=www.sindhiadabiboard.org}}</ref>


Pre-eminent Sindhi scholar [[Nabi Bakhsh Baloch|Nabi Baksh Baloch]] tried to reconcile all different conflicting accounts of Soomra origin. He considered Soomras, a hybrid race that was mix of Sindhi-Arab blood, emerged after the [[Umayyad Caliphate|Ummayad caliph]] [[Sulayman ibn Abd al-Malik]]’s decree asking Arab officers posted in Sindh to settle in the land permanently. Consequently they took Sindhi wives and subsequently married their daughters in Sindhi families.<ref name="Siddiqui" />
Pre-eminent Sindhi scholar [[Nabi Bakhsh Baloch|Nabi Baksh Baloch]] tried to reconcile all different conflicting accounts of Soomra origin. He considered Soomras, a hybrid race that was mix of Sindhi-Arab blood, emerged after the [[Umayyad Caliphate|Umayyad caliph]] [[Sulayman ibn Abd al-Malik]]’s decree asking Arab officers posted in Sindh to settle in the land permanently. Consequently they took Sindhi wives and subsequently married their daughters in Sindhi families.<ref name="Siddiqui" /> Hence, Dr. Baloch writes that:<blockquote>Soomras were descendents of these hybrid princes, whose ancestors, according to common legend, were either Arabs or their grand-sons on the mothers’ side.<ref name="Siddiqui" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Soomran Jo Daur - Sindhi Adabi Board Online Library (History) |url=http://www.sindhiadabiboard.org/catalogue/history/Book37/Book_page1.html |access-date=2023-01-10 |website=www.sindhiadabiboard.org}}</ref></blockquote>
Hence, Dr. Baloch writes that:<ref name="Siddiqui" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Soomran Jo Daur - Sindhi Adabi Board Online Library (History) |url=http://www.sindhiadabiboard.org/catalogue/history/Book37/Book_page1.html |access-date=2023-01-10 |website=www.sindhiadabiboard.org}}</ref><blockquote>Soomras were descendents of these hybrid princes, whose ancestors, according to common legend, were either Arabs or their grand-sons on the mothers’ side</blockquote>
 
== Clans ==
Āsoo, Āripotra, Amrani, Alyasani, Buja (Baja), Bāghul, Babrani, Bhayani, Bhein, Bheinan, Bheiyani, Bākhri, Bhākhri, Bhāra, Bharpotra, Bhutani/Bhootani, Chhora, [[Chhutta]], Chatta, Chattani, Chhatani, Chhodawar, Chāki, [[Dodai tribe|Dodai]], Dodani, Dodepotra, Dhakkar, Dhukar, Dāsra, Dāgha/Dāga, Donar, Danoor, Detha, Dhakan, Dakan, Dakhan, Dowar, Farās, Galahi/Gulahi, Gan, Gāgnani, [[Gurchani]], Gārhepotra, Hamir, Hamirani, Hamad, [[Halaypotra|Halepotro]], Holiani/Holani, Hassanpotra, Hamopotro/Hamupotro, Heesani, Heesbani, Hayatani, Hasnani, Issani, Inayatani, Jafrani, Jumrani, Jamrani, Jamarani, Jassani, Junsani, Jonsani, Jothia, Jiya, Jiyepotra, Jakhri, Jakhrepotra, Junejani, Kākar, [[Kachela|Kachelo]], Karmati, Kalhia/Kolhia, Kandipotra, Khafif, Khafipotra, Kula, Khebta, Khunbhati, Khenera, Khairani, Kala, Khato, Kukusaba, Kokri/Kaksia, Khuhawar, Lākhoria, Landar, Ladha, Luhār, Mundra, Matu, Muja, Moosepotra, Marzani, Muhammadpotro, Markan, Markanda, Markhand, Mastani, Mutkani/Matkani, Mirnani, [[Mirani (clan)|Mirani]], Mirzani, Matoi, Mahumia, Motipotra, Mundarpotra, Nurungpotra, Nurungzada, Niroti, Nangarpotra, Porgar, Panjani, Qiyasani, Ratar, Rukan, Raknani, Rainani, Rehanpotra, Rawa/Rawani, Rabu/Rabo, Rangrez, Sākroi, Sāmtio, Samathia, Sābra, Shaikhjapotra, Sākhpotra/Eshaqpotra, Supiya, Sānund, Shaja, Sathia, Sakriani/Sākriani, Sathian, Sāthani, Samisa, Sapiya, Saidha, Sājnani, Sanhiyan, Sanwand, Tāi, Tāipotra, Usta/Osta, Umarpotra, Umarani, Wāhara, Wardali.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Khair Mohammad Buriro Sewhani |url=http://archive.org/details/san_0600 |title=ذاتين جي انسائيڪلوپيڊيا |date=2005 |pages=477 |language=Sindhi}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 34: Line 53:
[[Category:Surnames]]
[[Category:Surnames]]
[[Category:Sindhi tribes]]
[[Category:Sindhi tribes]]
[[Category:Rajput clans of Sindh]]
[[Category:Maldhari communities]]
[[Category:Maldhari communities]]

Latest revision as of 14:51, 23 September 2025


Soomro
Religions Islam
LanguagesSindhi, Gujarati, Punjabi.
Country Pakistan,  India
RegionSindh, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab.
EthnicitySindhi
Feudal titleRaja, Rana

Soomro (Sindhi: {{safesubst:ifsubst|1=|2= Page Template:Script/styles arabic.css has no content.}سومرو</ span>‎ , Devanagari: सूमरो), Soomra, Sumrah or Sumra is a tribe having a local origin in Sindh, Pakistan. They are found in Sindh, parts of Punjab especially bordering Sindh, Balochistan province, and the Kutch district of the Indian state of Gujarat and also Rajasthan.[1][2][3][4] The Soomras ruled throughout the Sindh and Multan regions.[5]

The Soomro tribe established the Soomra dynasty in 1025 CE, which re-established native Sindhi rule over Sindh following the Arab conquests.[1] Many members of the Soomro tribe were among the first in Sindh to convert to Islam from Hinduism but initially continued to maintain several Hindu customs and traditions.[2][1]

Origins[edit | edit source]

Many authors have presented conflicting accounts of Soomro's origins. Michel Boivin adds that:

The Sūmras are believed to be Sodha Rajputs who embraced Islam through Ismāʿilī influence. After conversion, they adopted the name Sūmra.[6]

Maulai Shedai, a local researcher, believes Soomra are Parmar Rajputs.[1][2] But Ahmad Hasan Dani claims "of this there is no definite proof" and adds that it is almost certain the tribe has local origins as the kings bore local names.[7] M. H. Panhwar, a Sindhologist, also rejects a Rajput origin and attributes its to James Todd but still accepts native origin.[8] Some writers have detailed about a subdivision in Jats with the name "Sumra".[9][10] But Historian André Wink has mentioned that the Soomras were not Jats.[11]

He has also explained that Soomras who were of local Sindhi origin and had been semi-independent rulers after the death of Mahmud of Ghazni were different to pastoral-nomadic Jats or Meds. As per him, rise of Soomras was one of the factor in movement of the Jats of lower Sindh towards north.[12] Ghulam Hussain and others argue that the Soomros and other native tribes indigenous to Sindh slowly began to 'Ashrafize' themselves by remaking their genealogies to further associate themselves with Syeds whom they possibly intermarried and acquired power through.[13][2]

According to Tarikh Waqa`i Rajisthan, Soomras were Parmar Rajputs.[2][14]

Pre-eminent Sindhi scholar Nabi Baksh Baloch tried to reconcile all different conflicting accounts of Soomra origin. He considered Soomras, a hybrid race that was mix of Sindhi-Arab blood, emerged after the Umayyad caliph Sulayman ibn Abd al-Malik’s decree asking Arab officers posted in Sindh to settle in the land permanently. Consequently they took Sindhi wives and subsequently married their daughters in Sindhi families.[2] Hence, Dr. Baloch writes that:

Soomras were descendents of these hybrid princes, whose ancestors, according to common legend, were either Arabs or their grand-sons on the mothers’ side.[2][15]

Clans[edit | edit source]

Āsoo, Āripotra, Amrani, Alyasani, Buja (Baja), Bāghul, Babrani, Bhayani, Bhein, Bheinan, Bheiyani, Bākhri, Bhākhri, Bhāra, Bharpotra, Bhutani/Bhootani, Chhora, Chhutta, Chatta, Chattani, Chhatani, Chhodawar, Chāki, Dodai, Dodani, Dodepotra, Dhakkar, Dhukar, Dāsra, Dāgha/Dāga, Donar, Danoor, Detha, Dhakan, Dakan, Dakhan, Dowar, Farās, Galahi/Gulahi, Gan, Gāgnani, Gurchani, Gārhepotra, Hamir, Hamirani, Hamad, Halepotro, Holiani/Holani, Hassanpotra, Hamopotro/Hamupotro, Heesani, Heesbani, Hayatani, Hasnani, Issani, Inayatani, Jafrani, Jumrani, Jamrani, Jamarani, Jassani, Junsani, Jonsani, Jothia, Jiya, Jiyepotra, Jakhri, Jakhrepotra, Junejani, Kākar, Kachelo, Karmati, Kalhia/Kolhia, Kandipotra, Khafif, Khafipotra, Kula, Khebta, Khunbhati, Khenera, Khairani, Kala, Khato, Kukusaba, Kokri/Kaksia, Khuhawar, Lākhoria, Landar, Ladha, Luhār, Mundra, Matu, Muja, Moosepotra, Marzani, Muhammadpotro, Markan, Markanda, Markhand, Mastani, Mutkani/Matkani, Mirnani, Mirani, Mirzani, Matoi, Mahumia, Motipotra, Mundarpotra, Nurungpotra, Nurungzada, Niroti, Nangarpotra, Porgar, Panjani, Qiyasani, Ratar, Rukan, Raknani, Rainani, Rehanpotra, Rawa/Rawani, Rabu/Rabo, Rangrez, Sākroi, Sāmtio, Samathia, Sābra, Shaikhjapotra, Sākhpotra/Eshaqpotra, Supiya, Sānund, Shaja, Sathia, Sakriani/Sākriani, Sathian, Sāthani, Samisa, Sapiya, Saidha, Sājnani, Sanhiyan, Sanwand, Tāi, Tāipotra, Usta/Osta, Umarpotra, Umarani, Wāhara, Wardali.[16]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 "The Arab Conquest". International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics. 36 (1): 91. 2007. The Soomras are believed to be Parmar Rajputs found even today in Rajasthan, Saurashtra, Kutch and Sindh. The Cambridge History of India refers to the Soomras as "a Rajput dynasty the later members of which accepted Islam" (p. 54 ).
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Siddiqui, Habibullah. "The Soomras of Sindh: their origin, main characteristics and rule – an overview (general survey) (1025 – 1351 AD)" (PDF). Literary Conference on Soomra Period in Sindh.
  3. Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. p. 114. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4.
  4. Kumari, Ashok Pratap Singh& Patiraj (2007). Psychological Implications in Industrial Performance. Global Vision Publishing House. pp. 795–799. ISBN 978-81-8220-200-9.
  5. Wink, André (1 January 2002). "Garrison, Plain and March". Al-Hind, Volume 2 Slave Kings and the Islamic Conquest, 11th-13th Centuries. Vol. 2. Brill. pp. 243–246. doi:10.1163/9789004483019_012. ISBN 978-90-04-48301-9.
  6. Boivin, Michel (16 September 2021). "Indigenous People of Sindh". Brill's Encyclopedia of the Religions of the Indigenous People of South Asia Online. Brill. ..These episodes reflect the rivalry among different Rājpūt clans, especially after some converted to Islam. The Sūmras are among these, as they are said to be Soḍhā Rājpūts who converted to Islam under Ismāʿilī persuasion; after conversion, they changed their name from Soḍhā to Sūmra..
  7. Dani, Ahmad Hasan (2007). History of Pakistan: Pakistan through ages. Sang-e Meel Publications. ISBN 978-969-35-2020-0. But as many kings of the dynasty bore local names, it is almost certain that the Soomras were of local origin. Sometimes they are connected with Paramara Rajputs, but of this there is no definite proof.
  8. Panhwar, M.H.; Soomra National Council (Pakistan) (2003). An Illustrated Historical Atlas of Soomra Kingdom of Sindh: 1011-1351 AD. Soomra National Council, Pakistan. p. 26 (on pdf). Retrieved 2022-07-27. "Presence of Soomras in Kutch, Gujarat and Rajasthan in small numbers does not make them Rajputs either… All British period historians given in the table at end of this chapter have called Soomras as Rajputs under influence of Todd's writings. Actually they were local converted to Ismailism."
  9. Khan, H.A.; Choonara, S. (2004). Re-Thinking Punjab: The Construction of Siraiki Identity. Research and Publication Centre (RPC), National College of Arts. p. 130. ISBN 978-969-8623-09-8. Retrieved 2022-07-27. Other important braches and sub-divisions of the Jat in the Siraiki area include Panhwar, Parihar, Chajra, Daha, Jhakkar, Joiya, Guraha, Bhatti, Massan, Bhutta, Sahu, Sial, Jangla, Thind, Samtia, Sehar, Sumra…
  10. Bhatia, S. (1987). Social Change and Politics in Punjab, 1898-1910. Enkay Publishers. p. 24. ISBN 978-81-85148-13-7. Retrieved 2022-07-29. The Jats were divided into several tribes. In the Western plain (i.e., West of Lahore) excluding the salt range, and sub - montane tracts were to be found the Tahim, Butta, Langah, Sumra, Sipra and Hans
  11. Wink, André (1991). Al-hind: The Making of the Indo-islamic World. BRILL. p. 159. ISBN 978-90-04-09249-5. The Sammas rose to great power in Sind at about 1351 A.D., displacing the Sumras, who were not Jats and had achieved control of Lower Sind shortly after the death of Mahmud of Ghazna.
  12. Wink, André (2002). Al-Hind, the Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam 7Th-11th Centuries. BRILL. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-391-04173-8. In Lower Sind however we become dimly aware of the existence in the eighth and ninth centuries of a tribal people, the Sumras, who shortly after the death of Mahmud Ghaznavi became quasi-independent rulers throughout the Multan region, even when it remained nominally incorporated in the Ghaznavid and Ghurid dominion and subsequently in the Delhi Sultanate. The Sumras were a dynasty of local origin, later claiming to be Rajputs as well as Arabs, and are clearly distinguishable from the pastoral-nomadic Jats or Mids. In fact, it could very well be that next to the Baluchi immigration from the west, the rise of the Sumras was a factor in pushing the Jats of Lower Sind northward.
  13. Hussain, Ghulam (2019-08-02). "Dalits are in India, not in Pakistan: Exploring the Discursive Bases of the Denial of Dalitness under the Ashrafia Hegemony". Journal of Asian and African Studies. 55 (1). SAGE Publications: 24. doi:10.1177/0021909619863455. ISSN 0021-9096. S2CID 201404746. Soomra, Samma and Kalhora indigenous castes (locally known as Sammat) were further ashrafized. After conversion to Islam they intermarried with local Arab landowners and thus had acquired great influence and power. By furnishing Tuhfa-tul-Kiram and Beglar Namah, the two books on the history, as the reference, they reconstructed their genealogies to have roots in Arabs and in association with the Sayeds. Hence, the Soomras claimed to be Sumerian Arabs; Sammas, the descendants of Jamshed Abbasi of Persia, and Kalhoras traced their descent to Abbasid Khalifas
  14. Molai, Rahim Dad Khan. "Jannat Sindh - Sindhi Adabi Board Online Library (History)". www.sindhiadabiboard.org. Archived from the original on 2022-01-24. Retrieved 2023-01-10.
  15. "Soomran Jo Daur - Sindhi Adabi Board Online Library (History)". www.sindhiadabiboard.org. Retrieved 2023-01-10.
  16. Khair Mohammad Buriro Sewhani (2005). ذاتين جي انسائيڪلوپيڊيا (in Sindhi). p. 477.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)

Template:Sindhi tribes