Created by Ajay Kumar
Last edited March 7, 2026
Created a new article
 
page edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Small Persian painting on paper}}
{{short description|Small Persian painting on paper}}
{{Infobox intangible heritage
[[File:Yusef Zuleykha.jpg|thumb|[[Yusuf and Zulaikha]] ([[Joseph (son of Jacob)|Joseph]] chased by [[Potiphar's wife]]), by [[Behzād]]. [[:Commons:Category:Bustan of Sa'di, 1488, Herat (National Library of Egypt, Adab Farisi 22)|''Bustan'' of Sa'di]], Herat, 1488, created for Timurid ruler [[Sultan Husayn Bayqara]]]]
| Image      = Yusef Zuleykha.jpg
<!-- Please respect policy and do not change or consolidate the referencing -->
| imagesize  = 250px
A '''Persian miniature''' ({{langx|fa|نگارگری ایرانی|negârgari-ye Irâni}}) is a small [[Persian painting]] on paper, whether a book illustration or a separate work of art intended to be kept in an album of such works called a ''[[muraqqa]]''. The techniques are broadly comparable to the [[Medieval art|Western Medieval]] and [[Byzantine art|Byzantine]] traditions of [[Miniature (illuminated manuscript)|miniatures]] in [[illuminated manuscript]]s.  
| Caption    = [[Yusuf and Zulaikha]] ([[Joseph (son of Jacob)|Joseph]] chased by [[Potiphar's wife]]), by [[Behzād]], 1488
 
| ICH        = Persian miniature
Although there is an equally well-established Persian tradition of wall-painting, the survival rate and state of preservation of miniatures is better, and miniatures are much the best-known form of Persian painting in the West, and many of the most important examples are in Western, or Turkish, museums. Miniature painting became a significant [[genre]] in [[Persian art]] in the 13th century, receiving [[Chinese art|Chinese influence]] after the [[Mongol conquests]], and the highest point in the tradition was reached in the 15th and 16th centuries. The tradition continued, under some Western influence, after this, and has many modern exponents. The Persian miniature was the dominant influence on other [[Islamic miniature|Islamic miniature traditions]], principally the [[Ottoman miniature]] in [[Turkey]], and the [[Mughal painting|Mughal miniature]] in the [[Indian subcontinent]].
| State Party = Iran
| ID          = 01598
| Region      = IRN
| Category    =
| Year        = 2020
| Session    = 3rd
| Link        =
}}
<!-- Please respect policy and do not change or consolidate the referencing -->  
A '''Persian miniature''' ([[Persian language|Persian]]: نگارگری ایرانی ''negârgari Irâni'') is a small [[Persian painting]] on paper, whether a book illustration or a separate work of art intended to be kept in an album of such works called a ''[[muraqqa]]''. The techniques are broadly comparable to the [[Medieval art|Western Medieval]] and [[Byzantine art|Byzantine]] traditions of [[Miniature (illuminated manuscript)|miniatures]] in [[illuminated manuscript]]s. Although there is an equally well-established Persian tradition of wall-painting, the survival rate and state of preservation of miniatures is better, and miniatures are much the best-known form of Persian painting in the West, and many of the most important examples are in Western, or Turkish, museums. Miniature painting became a significant [[genre]] in [[Persian art]] in the 13th century, receiving [[Chinese art|Chinese influence]] after the [[Mongol conquests]], and the highest point in the tradition was reached in the 15th and 16th centuries. The tradition continued, under some Western influence, after this, and has many modern exponents. The Persian miniature was the dominant influence on other [[Islamic miniature|Islamic miniature traditions]], principally the [[Ottoman miniature]] in [[Turkey]], and the [[Mughal painting|Mughal miniature]] in the [[Indian sub-continent]].


[[Persian art]] under Islam [[Aniconism in Islam|had never completely forbidden the human figure]], and in the miniature tradition the depiction of figures, often in large numbers, is central. This was partly because the miniature is a private form, kept in a book or album and only shown to those the owner chooses. It was therefore possible to be more free than in wall paintings or other works seen by a wider audience. The [[Quran]] and other purely religious works are not known to have been illustrated in this way, though histories and other works of literature may include religiously related scenes, including those [[Depictions of Muhammad|depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad]], after 1500 usually without showing his face.<ref>Gruber, throughout; see Welch, 95-97 for one of the most famous examples, illustrated below</ref>
[[Persian art]] under Islam [[Aniconism in Islam|had never completely forbidden the human figure]], and in the miniature tradition the depiction of figures, often in large numbers, is central. This was partly because the miniature is a private form, kept in a book or album and only shown to those the owner chooses. It was therefore possible to be more free than in wall paintings or other works seen by a wider audience. The [[Quran]] and other purely religious works are not known to have been illustrated in this way, though histories and other works of literature may include religiously related scenes, including those [[Depictions of Muhammad|depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad]], after 1500 usually without showing his face.<ref>Gruber, throughout; see Welch, 95-97 for one of the most famous examples, illustrated below</ref>
Line 24: Line 14:
==Style==
==Style==
[[File:Хафт ауранг Джами 1556-65 Фрир.jpg|thumb|left|Camp scene from late in the classic period, with no frame ({{Circa|1556}}-1565), [[Freer Gallery of Art]], [[Washington, D.C.]]; [[Layla and Majnun|Majnun]] (at top wearing orange) spies on his beloved Layla (standing in tent doorway).]]
[[File:Хафт ауранг Джами 1556-65 Фрир.jpg|thumb|left|Camp scene from late in the classic period, with no frame ({{Circa|1556}}-1565), [[Freer Gallery of Art]], [[Washington, D.C.]]; [[Layla and Majnun|Majnun]] (at top wearing orange) spies on his beloved Layla (standing in tent doorway).]]
The bright and pure colouring of the Persian miniature is one of its most striking features. Normally all the [[pigment]]s used are mineral-based ones which keep their bright colours very well if kept in proper conditions, the main exception being silver, mostly used to depict water, which will oxidize to a rough-edged black over time.<ref>Gray (1930), 22-23</ref> The conventions of Persian miniatures changed slowly; faces are normally youthful and seen in three-quarters view, with a plump rounded lower face better suited to portraying typical Central Asian or Chinese features than those of most Persians. Lighting is even, without shadows or [[chiaroscuro]]. Walls and other surfaces are shown either frontally, or as at (to modern eyes) an angle of about 45 degrees, often giving the modern viewer the unintended impression that a building is (say) hexagonal in plan. Buildings are often shown in complex views, mixing interior views through windows or "cutaways" with exterior views of other parts of a facade. Costumes and architecture are always those of the time.<ref>Gray (1930), 22-28; Welch, 35</ref>
The bright and pure colouring of the Persian miniature is one of its most striking features. Normally all the [[pigment]]s used are mineral-based ones which keep their bright colours very well if kept in proper conditions, the main exception being silver, mostly used to depict water, which will oxidize to a rough-edged black over time.<ref>Gray (1930), 22-23</ref> The conventions of Persian miniatures changed slowly; faces are normally youthful and seen in three-quarters view, with a plump rounded lower face better suited to portraying typical Central Asian or Chinese features than those of most Persians. Lighting is even, without shadows or [[chiaroscuro]]. Walls and other surfaces are shown either frontally, or as at (to modern eyes) an angle of about 45 degrees, often giving the modern viewer the unintended impression that a building is (say) hexagonal in plan. Buildings are often shown in complex views, mixing interior views through windows or "cutaways" with exterior views of other parts of a facade. Costumes and architecture are always those of the time.<ref>Gray (1930), 22-28; Welch, 35</ref>


Many figures are often depicted, with those in the main scene normally rendered at the same size, and recession (depth in the picture space) indicated by placing more distant figures higher up in the space. More important figures may be somewhat larger than those around them, and battle scenes can be very crowded indeed. Great attention is paid to the background, whether of a landscape or buildings, and the detail and freshness with which plants and animals, the fabrics of tents, hangings or carpets, or tile patterns are shown is one of the great attractions of the form. The dress of figures is equally shown with great care, although artists understandably often avoid depicting the patterned cloth that many would have worn. Animals, especially the horses that very often appear, are mostly shown sideways on; even the love-stories that constitute much of the classic material illustrated are conducted largely in the saddle, as far as the prince-protagonist is concerned.<ref>Gray (1930), 25-26, 44-50</ref> Landscapes are very often mountainous (the plains that make up much of Persia are rarely attempted), this being indicated by a high undulating horizon, and outcrops of bare rock which, like the clouds in the normally small area of sky left above the landscape, are depicted in conventions derived from Chinese art. Even when a scene in a palace is shown, the viewpoint often appears to be from a point some metres in the air.<ref>Gray (1930), 25-26, 48-49, 64</ref>
Many figures are often depicted, with those in the main scene normally rendered at the same size, and recession (depth in the picture space) indicated by placing more distant figures higher up in the space. More important figures may be somewhat larger than those around them, and battle scenes can be very crowded indeed. Great attention is paid to the background, whether of a landscape or buildings, and the detail and freshness with which plants and animals, the fabrics of tents, hangings or carpets, or tile patterns are shown is one of the great attractions of the form. The dress of figures is equally shown with great care, although artists understandably often avoid depicting the patterned cloth that many would have worn. Animals, especially the horses that very often appear, are mostly shown sideways on; even the love-stories that constitute much of the classic material illustrated are conducted largely in the saddle, as far as the prince-protagonist is concerned.<ref>Gray (1930), 25-26, 44-50</ref> Landscapes are very often mountainous (the plains that make up much of Persia are rarely attempted), this being indicated by a high undulating horizon, and outcrops of bare rock which, like the clouds in the normally small area of sky left above the landscape, are depicted in conventions derived from Chinese art. Even when a scene in a palace is shown, the viewpoint often appears to be from a point some metres in the air.<ref>Gray (1930), 25-26, 48-49, 64</ref>


The earliest miniatures appeared unframed horizontally across the page in the middle of text, following Byzantine and Arabic precedents, but in the 14th century the vertical format was introduced, perhaps influenced by Chinese scroll-paintings. This is used in all the luxury manuscripts for the court that constitute the most famous Persian manuscripts, and the vertical format dictates many characteristics of the style.<ref>Sims</ref>
The earliest miniatures appeared unframed horizontally across the page in the middle of text, following Byzantine and Arabic precedents, but in the 14th century the vertical format was introduced, perhaps influenced by Chinese scroll-paintings. This is used in all the luxury manuscripts for the court that constitute the most famous Persian manuscripts, and the vertical format dictates many characteristics of the style.<ref>Sims</ref>  
[[File:Saki - Reza Abbasi - Moraqqa’-e Golshan 1609 Golestan Palace.jpg|thumb|''Saki'', album miniature by [[Reza Abbasi]], 1609]]
[[File:Saki - Reza Abbasi - Moraqqa’-e Golshan 1609 Golestan Palace.jpg|thumb|''Saki'', album miniature by [[Reza Abbasi]], 1609]]


The miniatures normally occupy a full page, later sometimes spreading across two pages to regain a square or horizontal "landscape" format. There are often panels of text or captions inside the picture area, which is enclosed in a frame, eventually of several ruled lines with a broader band of gold or colour. The rest of the page is often decorated with dense designs of plants and animals in a muted ''[[grisaille]]'', often gold and brown; text pages without miniatures often also have such borders. In later manuscripts, elements of the miniature begin to expand beyond the frame, which may disappear on one side of the image, or be omitted completely.<ref>OAO (3, ii and elsewhere)</ref>
The miniatures normally occupy a full page, later sometimes spreading across two pages to regain a square or horizontal "landscape" format. There are often panels of text or captions inside the picture area, which is enclosed in a frame, eventually of several ruled lines with a broader band of gold or colour. The rest of the page is often decorated with dense designs of plants and animals in a muted ''[[grisaille]]'', often gold and brown; text pages without miniatures often also have such borders. In later manuscripts, elements of the miniature begin to expand beyond the frame, which may disappear on one side of the image, or be omitted completely.<ref>OAO (3, ii and elsewhere)</ref>


Another later development was the album miniature, conceived as a single picture rather than a book illustration, though such images may be accompanied by short lyric poems. The withdrawal of Shah [[Tahmasp I]] from commissioning illustrated books in the 1540s probably encouraged artists to transfer to these cheaper works for a wider circle of patrons.<ref>Brend, 164-165</ref> Albums or ''[[muraqqa]]s'' were assembled by collectors with album miniatures, specimen pages of calligraphy, and miniatures taken from older books, to which border paintings were often added when they were remounted. Album miniatures usually showed a few figures on a larger scale, with less attention to the background, and tended to become drawings with some tints of coloured wash, rather than fully painted.
Another later development was the album miniature, conceived as a single picture rather than a book illustration, though such images may be accompanied by short lyric poems. The withdrawal of Shah [[Tahmasp I]] from commissioning illustrated books in the 1540s probably encouraged artists to transfer to these cheaper works for a wider circle of patrons.<ref>Brend, 164-165</ref> Albums or ''[[muraqqa]]s'' were assembled by collectors with album miniatures, specimen pages of calligraphy, and miniatures taken from older books, to which border paintings were often added when they were remounted. Album miniatures usually showed a few figures on a larger scale, with less attention to the background, and tended to become drawings with some tints of coloured wash, rather than fully painted.


In the example at right the clothes are fully painted, and the background uses the gold grisaille style earlier reserved for marginal decoration, as in the miniature at the head of the article. Many were individual portraits, either of notable figures (but initially rarely portraits of rulers), or of idealized beautiful youths. Others were scenes of lovers in a garden or picnics. From about the middle of the 16th century these types of images became dominant, but they gradually declined in quality and originality and tended towards conventional prettiness and sentimentality.<ref>OAO, Sims; Gray (1930), 74-81</ref>
In the example at right the clothes are fully painted, and the background uses the gold grisaille style earlier reserved for marginal decoration, as in the miniature at the head of the article. Many were individual portraits, either of notable figures (but initially rarely portraits of rulers), or of idealized beautiful youths. Others were scenes of lovers in a garden or picnics. From about the middle of the 16th century these types of images became dominant, but they gradually declined in quality and originality and tended towards conventional prettiness and sentimentality.<ref>OAO, Sims; Gray (1930), 74-81</ref>


Books were sometimes refurbished and added to after an interval of many years, adding or partly repainting miniatures, changing the border decoration, and making other changes, not all improvements.<ref>OAO</ref> The ''Conference of the Birds'' miniature in the gallery below is an addition of 1600 to a manuscript of over a century earlier, and elements of the style appear to represent an effort to match the earlier miniatures in the book.<ref>[http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/63.210.11 Metropolitan Museum of Art] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110307032731/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/63.210.11/ |date=2011-03-07 }} "The Conference of the Birds": Page from a manuscript of the Mantiq al-Tayr (The Language of the Birds) of Farid al-Din cAttar, [[Isfahan]] (63.210.11). In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The [[Metropolitan Museum of Art]], 2000–.</ref> The famous painting ''Princes of the House of Timur'' was first painted in 1550-55 in Persia for the exiled Mughal prince [[Humayun]], who largely began the Mughal miniature tradition by taking back Persian miniaturists when he gained the throne. It was then twice updated in India (c.1605 and 1628) to show later generations of the royal house.<ref>Crill and Jarilwala, 50-51; [http://www.artfund.org/artwork/4691/princes-of-the-house-of-timur Art Fund] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110617040117/http://www.artfund.org/artwork/4691/princes-of-the-house-of-timur |date=2011-06-17 }} with image.  The painting uses miniature techniques on cotton, and is much larger than most miniatures.</ref> The dimensions of the manuscripts covered a range not dissimilar to typical modern books, though with a more vertical ratio; many were as small as a modern paperback, others larger. Shah Tamasp's ''Shahnameh'' stood 47&nbsp;cm high, and one exceptional ''Shahnameh'' from [[Tabriz]] of c. 1585 stood 53&nbsp;cm high.<ref>Uluc, 73</ref>
Books were sometimes refurbished and added to after an interval of many years, adding or partly repainting miniatures, changing the border decoration, and making other changes, not all improvements.<ref>OAO</ref> The ''Conference of the Birds'' miniature in the gallery below is an addition of 1600 to a manuscript of over a century earlier, and elements of the style appear to represent an effort to match the earlier miniatures in the book.<ref>[http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/63.210.11 Metropolitan Museum of Art] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110307032731/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/63.210.11/ |date=2011-03-07 }} "The Conference of the Birds": Page from a manuscript of the Mantiq al-Tayr (The Language of the Birds) of Farid al-Din cAttar, [[Isfahan]] (63.210.11). In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The [[Metropolitan Museum of Art]], 2000–.</ref> The famous painting ''Princes of the House of Timur'' was first painted in 1550-55 in Persia for the exiled Mughal prince [[Humayun]], who largely began the Mughal miniature tradition by taking back Persian miniaturists when he gained the throne. It was then twice updated in India (c.1605 and 1628) to show later generations of the royal house.<ref>Crill and Jarilwala, 50-51; [http://www.artfund.org/artwork/4691/princes-of-the-house-of-timur Art Fund] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110617040117/http://www.artfund.org/artwork/4691/princes-of-the-house-of-timur |date=2011-06-17 }} with image.  The painting uses miniature techniques on cotton, and is much larger than most miniatures.</ref> The dimensions of the manuscripts covered a range not dissimilar to typical modern books, though with a more vertical ratio; many were as small as a modern paperback, others larger. Shah Tamasp's ''Shahnameh'' stood 47&nbsp;cm high, and one exceptional ''Shahnameh'' from [[Tabriz]] of c. 1585 stood 53&nbsp;cm high.<ref>Uluc, 73</ref>


==Artists and technique==
==Artists and technique==
[[File:Mir Sayyid Ali 2.jpg|thumb|left|Complex palace scene, 1539–1543, [[Mir Sayyid Ali]]]]  
[[File:Nighttime in a City. Circa 1540, Tabriz (Sackler Museum, 1958.76).jpg|thumb|left|''Nighttime in a City'': urban activity in the Safavid capital of [[Tabriz]], painted circa 1540 for [[Shah Tahmasp]] (Sackler Museum, 1958.76).{{sfn|Melville|2021|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=NaALEAAAQBAJ&pg=119 119], [https://books.google.com/books?id=NaALEAAAQBAJ&pg=125 note 43]}}<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sarabi |first1=Mina |title=Architectural and Spatial Design studies of Sahibabad, Tabriz, Iran in the Persian Miniature Painting "Nighttime in a Palace" |journal=JACO Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient Quarterly |date=10 May 2023 |issue=38 |doi=10.22034/JACO.2022.366374.1270 |url=https://www.academia.edu/101572606/Architectural_and_Spatial_Design_studies_of_Sahibabad_Tabriz_Iran_in_the_Persian_Miniature_Painting_Nighttime_in_a_Palace_}}</ref>]]
In the classic period artists were exclusively male, and normally grouped in workshops, of which the royal workshop (not necessarily in a single building) was much the most prestigious, recruiting talented artists from the [[bazaar]] workshops in the major cities. However the nature of the royal workshop remains unclear, as some manuscripts are recorded as being worked on in different cities, rulers often took artists with them on their travels, and at least some artists were able to work on private commissions.<ref>Roxburgh (2000), 6-8</ref> As in Europe, sons very often followed their father into the workshop, but boys showing talent from any background might be recruited; at least one notable painter was born a slave. There were some highly placed amateur artists, including [[Shah Tahmasp I]] (reigned 1524–1576), who was also one of the greatest patrons of miniatures. Persian artists were highly sought after by other Islamic courts, especially those of the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] and [[Mughal Empire]]s, whose own traditions of miniature were based on Persian painting but developed rather different styles.<ref>Welch, 12-14</ref>
In the classic period artists were exclusively male, and normally grouped in workshops, of which the royal workshop (not necessarily in a single building) was much the most prestigious, recruiting talented artists from the [[bazaar]] workshops in the major cities. However the nature of the royal workshop remains unclear, as some manuscripts are recorded as being worked on in different cities, rulers often took artists with them on their travels, and at least some artists were able to work on private commissions.<ref>Roxburgh (2000), 6-8</ref> As in Europe, sons very often followed their father into the workshop, but boys showing talent from any background might be recruited; at least one notable painter was born a slave. There were some highly placed amateur artists, including [[Shah Tahmasp I]] (reigned 1524–1576), who was also one of the greatest patrons of miniatures. Persian artists were highly sought after by other Islamic courts, especially those of the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] and [[Mughal Empire]]s, whose own traditions of miniature were based on Persian painting but developed rather different styles.<ref>Welch, 12-14</ref>


The work was often divided between the main painter, who drew the outlines, and less senior painters who coloured in the drawing. In [[Mughal miniature]]s at least, a third artist might do just the faces. Then there might be the border paintings; in most books using them these are by far the largest area of painted material as they occur on text pages as well. The miniatures in a book were often divided up between different artists, so that the best manuscripts represent an overview of the finest work of the period. The scribes or [[Calligraphy|calligraphers]] were normally different people, on the whole regarded as having a rather higher status than the artists - their names are more likely to be noted in the manuscript.
The work was often divided between the main painter, who drew the outlines, and less senior painters who coloured in the drawing. In [[Mughal miniature]]s at least, a third artist might do just the faces. Then there might be the border paintings; in most books using them these are by far the largest area of painted material as they occur on text pages as well. The miniatures in a book were often divided up between different artists, so that the best manuscripts represent an overview of the finest work of the period. The scribes or [[Calligraphy|calligraphers]] were normally different people, on the whole regarded as having a rather higher status than the artists - their names are more likely to be noted in the manuscript.


Royal librarians probably played a significant role in managing the commissions; the extent of direct involvement by the ruler himself is normally unclear. The scribes wrote the main text first, leaving spaces for the miniatures, presumably having made a plan for these with the artist and the librarian. The book covers were also richly decorated for luxury manuscripts, and when they too have figurative scenes these presumably used drawings by the same artists who created the miniatures. Paper was the normal material for the pages, unlike the [[vellum]] normally used in Europe for as long as the illuminated manuscript tradition lasted. The paper was highly polished, and when not given painted borders might be flecked with gold leaf.<ref>Gray (1930), 22-26; Welch, 12-14</ref>
Royal librarians probably played a significant role in managing the commissions; the extent of direct involvement by the ruler himself is normally unclear. The scribes wrote the main text first, leaving spaces for the miniatures, presumably having made a plan for these with the artist and the librarian. The book covers were also richly decorated for luxury manuscripts, and when they too have figurative scenes these presumably used drawings by the same artists who created the miniatures. Paper was the normal material for the pages, unlike the [[vellum]] normally used in Europe for as long as the illuminated manuscript tradition lasted. The paper was highly polished, and when not given painted borders might be flecked with gold leaf.<ref>Gray (1930), 22-26; Welch, 12-14</ref>


A unique survival from the Timurid period, found "pasted inconspicuously" in a muraqqa in the [[Topkapi Palace]] is thought to be a report to Baysunghur from his librarian. After a brief and high-flown introduction, "Petition from the most humble servants of the royal library, whose eyes are as expectant of the dust from the hooves of the regal steed as the ears of those who fast are for the cry of ''[[Allahu akbar]]'' ..." it continues with very businesslike and detailed notes on what each of some twenty-five named artists, scribes and craftsmen has been up to over a period of perhaps a week: "Amir Khalil has finished the waves in two sea-scenes of the ''[[Gulistan of Sa'di|Gulistan]]'' and will begin to apply colour. ... All the painters are working on painting and tinting seventy-five tent-poles .... Mawlana Ali is designing a frontispiece illumination for the ''Shahnama''. His eyes were sore for a few days."<ref>Thackston, 43-44</ref> Apart from book arts, designs for tent-makers, tile-makers, woodwork and a saddle are mentioned, as is the progress of the "[[begum|begim]]'s little chest".<ref>Thackston, 43-44; a good number of those named are mentioned in other sources.</ref>
A unique survival from the Timurid period, found "pasted inconspicuously" in a muraqqa in the [[Topkapi Palace]] is thought to be a report to Baysunghur from his librarian. After a brief and high-flown introduction, "Petition from the most humble servants of the royal library, whose eyes are as expectant of the dust from the hooves of the regal steed as the ears of those who fast are for the cry of ''[[Allahu akbar]]'' ..." it continues with very businesslike and detailed notes on what each of some twenty-five named artists, scribes and craftsmen has been up to over a period of perhaps a week: "Amir Khalil has finished the waves in two sea-scenes of the ''[[Gulistan (book)|Gulistan]]'' and will begin to apply colour. ... All the painters are working on painting and tinting seventy-five tent-poles .... Mawlana Ali is designing a frontispiece illumination for the ''Shahnama''. His eyes were sore for a few days."<ref>Thackston, 43-44</ref> Apart from book arts, designs for tent-makers, tile-makers, woodwork and a saddle are mentioned, as is the progress of the "[[begum|begim]]'s little chest".<ref>Thackston, 43-44; a good number of those named are mentioned in other sources.</ref>


== History ==
== History ==
[[File:Muhammad during the Mi'raj - from Jami al-Tawarikh.jpg|thumb|left|The [[Mi'raj]] (also called the "Night Ride") of Muhammed on [[Buraq]], Tabriz, 1307; Ilkhanid, with both Christian and Chinese influences, and horizontal format.]]
The ancient Persian religion of [[Manichaeism]] made considerable use of images; not only was the founding prophet [[Mani (prophet)|Mani]] (c.216–276) a professional artist, at least according to later Islamic tradition, but one of the sacred books of the religion, the [[Arzhang]], was illustrated by the prophet himself, whose illustrations (probably essentially cosmological diagrams rather than images with figures) were regarded as part of the sacred material and always copied with the text. Unfortunately, the religion was repressed strongly from the [[Sasanian Empire|Sasanian era]] and onwards so that only tiny fragments of Manichean art survive. These no doubt influenced the continuing Persian tradition, but little can be said about how. It is also known that [[Sasanian architecture|Sasanian palaces]] had wall-paintings, but only fragments of these have survived.<ref>Gray (1930), 27-28</ref>
[[File:Demotte Shahname 002.jpg|thumb|left|Scene from the [[Demotte Shahnameh|Demotte or "Great Mongol ''Shahnameh''"]], a key Ilkhanid work, 1330s?]]


The ancient Persian religion of [[Manichaeism]] made considerable use of images; not only was the founding prophet [[Mani (prophet)|Mani]] (c.216–276) a professional artist, at least according to later Islamic tradition, but one of the sacred books of the religion, the [[Arzhang]], was illustrated by the prophet himself, whose illustrations (probably essentially cosmological diagrams rather than images with figures) were regarded as part of the sacred material and always copied with the text.  Unfortunately, the religion was repressed strongly from the Sassanid era and onwards so that only tiny fragments of Manichean art survive.  These no doubt influenced the continuing Persian tradition, but little can be said about how.  It is also known that [[Sassanid]] palaces had wall-paintings, but only fragments of these have survived.<ref>Gray (1930), 27-28</ref>
There are narrative scenes in pottery (''[[Mina'i ware|Mina'i]]'' ceramics), though it is hard to judge how these relate to lost contemporary book painting.<ref>Sims</ref> Recent scholarship has noted that, although surviving early examples are now uncommon, human figurative art was also a continuous tradition in Islamic lands in secular contexts (such as literature, science, and history); as early as the 9th century, such art flourished during the [[Abbasid Caliphate]] (c. 749-1258, across Spain, North Africa, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Mesopotamia, and Persia).<ref>{{cite book|author1=J. Bloom|author2=S. Blair|name-list-style=amp|title=Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art|year=2009|publisher=Oxford University Press, Inc.|location=New York|isbn=978-0-19-530991-1|pages=192 and 207|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&q=cairo+egypt+miniature+paintings+mamluk&pg=RA1-PA192|access-date=2020-11-02|archive-date=2023-07-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701140919/https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&q=cairo+egypt+miniature+paintings+mamluk&pg=RA1-PA192|url-status=live}}</ref>


There are narrative scenes in pottery, though it is hard to judge how these relate to lost contemporary book painting.<ref>Sims</ref>  Recent scholarship has noted that, although surviving early examples are now uncommon, human figurative art was also a continuous tradition in Islamic lands in secular contexts (such as literature, science, and history); as early as the 9th century, such art flourished during the [[Abbasid Caliphate]] (c. 749-1258, across Spain, North Africa, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Mesopotamia, and Persia).<ref>{{cite book|author1=J. Bloom|author2=S. Blair|name-list-style=amp|title=Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art|year=2009|publisher=Oxford University Press, Inc.|location=New York|isbn=978-0-19-530991-1|pages=192 and 207|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&q=cairo+egypt+miniature+paintings+mamluk&pg=RA1-PA192|access-date=2020-11-02|archive-date=2023-07-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701140919/https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&q=cairo+egypt+miniature+paintings+mamluk&pg=RA1-PA192|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Earliest illustrated manuscript in Persian (c.1250)===
[[File:Varka and Golshah. Battle scene 1. Mid 13th century Seljuk Anatolia.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Rabī cuts his adversary in half. Battle scene, in ''Varka and Golshah'', mid-13th century Seljuk Anatolia.]]
The great period of the Persian miniature began when Persia was ruled by a succession of foreign dynasties, who came from the east and north. Before the Mongol [[Ilkhanate]] (1253–1353), narrative representations are only known in Persia in architecture and ceramics.<ref name="JB214">{{cite book |last1=Bloom |first1=Jonathan |last2=Blair |first2=Sheila |title=Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set |date=14 May 2009 |publisher=OUP USA |isbn=978-0-19-530991-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&pg=RA1-PA214 |page=214-215 |language=en}}</ref> With the large tradition of [[Arabic miniature|Arabic manuscripts]] in the 12th-13th centuries, illustrated manuscripts probably also existed in Persia, but none are known.<ref name="RE">{{cite journal |last1=Ettinghausen |first1=Richard |title=On Some Mongol Miniatures |journal=Kunst des Orients |date=1959 |volume=3 |pages=44–45 |jstor=20752311 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20752311 |issn=0023-5393}}</ref><ref name="JB214"/>  


The great period of the Persian miniature began when Persia was ruled by a succession of foreign dynasties, who came from the east and north. The traumatic [[Mongol conquests|Mongol invasion]] of [[Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia and Eastern Iran|1219]] onwards established the [[Ilkhanate]] as a branch of the [[Mongol Empire]], and despite the huge destruction of life and property, the new court had a galvanising effect on book painting, importing many Chinese works and probably artists, with their long-established tradition of narrative painting. The Ilkhanids continued to migrate between summer and winter quarters, which together with other travels for war, hunting and administration, made the portable form of the illustrated book the most suitable vehicle for painting, as it also was for mobile European medieval rulers.<ref>Sims</ref> The [[Great Mongol Shahnameh]], now dispersed, is the outstanding manuscript of the period.<ref>Canby (1993), 33-34</ref>
The earliest known illustrated manuscript in the Persian language is an early 13th century copy of the epic ''[[Varka and Golshah]]'', which was most probably created in [[Konya]] in [[Central Anatolia region|Central Anatolia]], under the Seljuk [[Sultanate of Rum]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Porter |first1=Yves |last2=Flood |first2=Finbarr Barry |title=Under the adorned dome: four essays on the arts of Iran and India |date=2023 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden Boston |isbn=978-90-04-54971-5 |page=17, note 30 |quote= The Varqa and Gulshāh was probably made in the [[Sultanate of Rum|Konya sultanate]].}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Hillenbrand|2021|p=208}} "The earliest illustrated Persian manuscript, signed by an artist from Khuy in north-west Iran, was produced between 1225 and 1250, almost certainly in Konya. (Cf. A. S. Melikian-Chirvani, ‘Le roman de Varqe et Golsâh’, Arts Asiatiques XXII (Paris, 1970))"</ref><ref name="SSB">{{cite book |last1=Blair |first1=Sheila S. |title=Islamic Calligraphy |date=19 January 2020 |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |isbn=978-1-4744-6447-5 |page=366 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m6QxEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA366 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Necipoğlu |first1=Gülru |last2=Leal |first2=Karen A. |title=Muqarnas |date=1 October 2009 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-17589-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gq6obUbnqsMC&pg=PA235 |language=en}}</ref> It is the only Persian-language illustrated manuscript securely datable to before Mongol conquest, and it can be dated to circa 1250.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bloom |first1=Jonathan |last2=Blair |first2=Sheila |title=Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set |date=14 May 2009 |publisher=OUP USA |isbn=978-0-19-530991-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&pg=RA1-PA214 |page=214–215 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Ettinghausen |first1=Richard |title=Arab painting |date=1977 |publisher=New York : Rizzoli |isbn=978-0-8478-0081-0 |page=91, [https://archive.org/details/arabpainting0000etti/page/92/mode/2up?q=%22Illustration+page+91%22 92], [https://archive.org/details/arabpainting0000etti/page/162/mode/2up?q=%22these+Turks%22 162] commentary |url=https://archive.org/details/arabpainting0000etti/page/91/mode/2up |quote=The two scenes in the top and bottom registers (...) may be strongly influenced by contemporary Seljuk Persian (...) like those in the recently discovered Varqeh and Gulshah (p.92) (...) In the painting the facial cast of these Turks is obviously reflected, and so are the special fashions and accoutrements they favored. (p.162, commentary on image from p.91)}}</ref>


After 1335 the Ilkhanate split into several warring dynasties, all swept aside by the new invasion of [[Timur]] from 1381. He established the [[Timurid dynasty]], bringing a fresh wave of Chinese influence, who were replaced by the [[Black Sheep Turkmen]] in 1452, followed by the [[White Sheep Turkmen]] from 1468, who were in turn replaced by the [[Safavid dynasty]] by 1501; they ruled until 1722. After a chaotic period [[Nader Shah]] took control, but there was no long-lived dynasty until the [[Qajar dynasty]], who ruled from 1794 to 1925.<ref>Gray (1976), 309-315, OAO; Rawson, 146-147</ref>
===Mongol era (1260–1335)===
[[File:Baysunghur's Shahname 001.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Baysonghor Shahnameh]], 1430. He was a key patron of the [[Herat]] school]]
[[File:Suppl. Pers. 205 Frontispiece detail.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|[[Ata-Malik Juvayni|Juvaynī]] sitting and writing in front of Mongol emir [[Arghun Aqa]]. Frontispiece of ''[[Tārīkh-i Jahān-Gushā]]'' "The History of The World Conqueror" (damaged), completed in A.H. 689/ 1290 CE. Bibliothèque Nationale de France ([[:Commons:Category:Bibliothèque Nationale de France (Suppl. Pers. 205)|Suppl. Pers. 205]]).<ref name="Groove">{{cite journal |last1=Jaber |first1=Shady |title=The Paintings of al-Āthār al-Bāqiya of al-Bīrūnī: A Turning Point in Islamic Visual Representation |journal=Lebanese American University |date=2021 |page=Figure 5 |url=https://laur.lau.edu.lb:8443/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10725/13751/Shady_Jaber_Thesis_Redacted.pdf?sequence=3}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Consultation Supplément Persan 205 |url=https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc33978s |website=archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr |publisher=Bibliothèque Nationale de France}}</ref> It shows the "origin of the ''Metropolitan style''" at the [[Ilkhanid]] court.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bloom |first1=Jonathan |last2=Blair |first2=Sheila |title=Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set |date=14 May 2009 |publisher=OUP USA |isbn=978-0-19-530991-1 |page=215 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&pg=RA1-PA215 |language=en}}</ref>]]
The traumatic [[Mongol conquests|Mongol invasion]] of [[Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia and Eastern Iran|1219]] onwards established the [[Ilkhanate]] as a branch of the [[Mongol Empire]], and despite the huge destruction of life and property, the new court had a galvanising effect on book painting, importing many Chinese works and probably artists, with their long-established tradition of narrative painting, and sponsoring a cultural revival and the creation of history-related literary works.<ref name="JB215"/> Baghdad [[Siege of Baghdad|was conquered in 1258]], and [[Mosul]] in 1262.


It was only in the 14th century that the practice began of commissioning illustrated copies of classic works of [[Persian poetry]], above all the ''[[Shahnameh]]'' of [[Ferdowsi]] (940-1020) and the ''[[Khamsa of Nizami]]'', which were to contain many of the finest miniatures. Previously book illustration, of works in both Arabic and Persian, had been concentrated in practical and scientific treatises, often following at several removes the Byzantine miniatures copied when ancient Greek books were translated.<ref>Gray (1976), 310-311</ref> However a 14th-century flowering of Arabic illustrated literary manuscripts in Syria and Egypt collapsed at the end of the century, leaving Persia the undisputed leader in Islamic book illustration.<ref>Sims</ref> Many of the best miniatures from early manuscripts were removed from their books in later centuries and transferred to albums, several of which are now in [[Istanbul]]; this complicates tracing the art history of the period.<ref>Simms</ref>
The earliest known Persian-language manuscript of ''[[Kalīla wa-Dimna]]'' (Topkapl Palace Museum Library, H.363) appears around this time: it is dated to 1265-80, and was likely produced in [[Baghdad]], or possibly [[Mosul]].<ref>{{cite web |title=KALILA WA DEMNA iii. ILLUSTRATIONS |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kalila-wa-demna-iii/ |website=Encyclopaedia Iranica |quote=The earliest illustrated Arabic manuscripts that have survived date from the beginning of the 13th century, while the earliest illustrated Persian example (Istanbul, Topkapi Saray Library, MS H. 363) is from the last quarter of that century.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Contadini |first1=Anna |title=Arab painting: text and image in illustrated Arabic manuscripts |date=2010 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden Boston |isbn=978-90-04-18630-9 |page=140 |edition=2nd rev. |quote=...the earliest surviving Persian manuscript of the text, H. 363 of the Topkapı Saray Library, datable to 1265–80.}}</ref> Another known illustrated Persian manuscript under the Mongols is the ''[[Tarikh-i Jahangushay]]'' (1290), commissioned by the Mongol emir [[Arghun Aqa]], also one of the earliest examples of "Metropolitan style" of the Mongol [[Ilkhanid]] court, followed by the 1297-1299 manuscript ''[[Manafi' al-Hayawan (Ms M. 500)|Manafi' al-hayawan]]'' (Ms M. 500), commissioned by Mongol ruler [[Ghazan]].<ref name="JB215">{{cite book |last1=Bloom |first1=Jonathan |last2=Blair |first2=Sheila |title=Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set |date=14 May 2009 |publisher=OUP USA |isbn=978-0-19-530991-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=un4WcfEASZwC&pg=RA1-PA215 |page=215 |language=en}}</ref> The Ilkhanids continued to migrate between summer and winter quarters, which together with other travels for war, hunting and administration, made the portable form of the illustrated book the most suitable vehicle for painting, as it also was for mobile European medieval rulers.<ref>Sims</ref> The ''[[Great Mongol Shahnameh]]'', now dispersed, is the outstanding manuscript of the following period.<ref>Canby (1993), 33-34</ref>


Miniatures from the Safavid and later periods are far more common than earlier ones, but although some prefer the simpler elegance of the early 15th and 16th centuries, most art historians agree in seeing a rise in quality up to the mid-16th century, culminating in a series of superb royal commissions by the Safavid court, such as the [[Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp]] (or Houghton Shahnameh). There was a crisis in the 1540s when Shah [[Tahmasp I]], previously a patron on a large scale, ceased to commission works, apparently losing interest in painting.  Some of his artists went to the court of his nephew [[Ibrahim Mirza]], governor of [[Mashad]] from 1556, where there was a brief flowering of painting until the Shah fell out with his nephew in 1565, including a ''[[Haft Awrang]]'', the "Freer Jami". Other artists went to the Mughal court.<ref>Titley, 103; Welch (mostly on Freer Jami after p. 24), 23-27, 31, 98-127; [http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/loveYearning/base.html Freer Gallery] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220104075728/https://asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/loveYearning/base.html/ |date=2022-01-04 }}</ref> After this the number of illustrated book manuscript commissions falls off, and the tradition falls into over-sophistication and decline.<ref>OAO; Gray (1930), 74-89; Welch, throughout</ref>
It was only in the 14th century that the practice began of commissioning illustrated copies of classic works of [[Persian poetry]], above all the ''[[Shahnameh]]'' of [[Ferdowsi]] (940–1020) and the ''[[Khamsa of Nizami]]'', which were to contain many of the finest miniatures. Previously book illustration, of works in both Arabic and Persian, had been concentrated in practical and scientific treatises, often following at several removes the Byzantine miniatures copied when ancient Greek books were translated.<ref>Gray (1976), 310-311</ref> However a 14th-century flowering of Arabic illustrated literary manuscripts in Syria and Egypt collapsed at the end of the century, leaving Persia the undisputed leader in Islamic book illustration.<ref>Sims</ref> Many of the best miniatures from early manuscripts were removed from their books in later centuries and transferred to albums, several of which are now in [[Istanbul]]; this complicates tracing the art history of the period.<ref>Simms</ref>


[[Tabriz]] in the north-west of Iran is the longest established centre of production, and [[Baghdad]] (then under Persian rule) was often important. [[Shiraz]] in the south, sometimes the capital of a sub-ruler, was a centre from the late 14th century, and [[Herat]], now in [[Afghanistan]], was important in the periods when it was controlled from Persia, especially when the Timurid prince [[Baysonqor]] was governor in the 1420s; he was then the leading patron in Persia, commissioning the [[Baysonghor Shahnameh]] and other works.  Each centre developed its own style, which were largely reconciled and combined under the Safavids.<ref>Gray (1930), 37-55; Welch, 14-18; OAO</ref>
<gallery class="center" widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Arabischer Maler um 1295 001.jpg|[['Ubayd Allah ibn Bakhtishu|Ibn Bakhtishu]]'s ''[[Manafi al-Hayawan]]'' ("Uses of Animals"), commissioned by [[Ghazan]]. [[Maragha]], Persia, 1297–1299. Morgan Library & Museum ([[:Commons:Category:Manafi' al-Hayawan (The Morgan Library & Museum MS M 500)|Ms. M.500]]).<ref name="Groove"/>
File:Muhammad during the Mi'raj - from Jami al-Tawarikh.jpg|The [[Mi'raj]] (also called the "Night Ride") of Muhammed on [[Buraq]], Tabriz, 1307; Ilkhanid, with both Christian and Chinese influences, and horizontal format.
File:Demotte Shahname 002.jpg|Scene from the [[Great Mongol Shahnameh]], a key Ilkhanid work, 1330s?
</gallery>


The schools of Herat, where the [[Timurid dynasty|Timurid]] royal workshops usually were, had developed a style of classical restraint and elegance, and the painters of Tabriz, a more expressive and imaginative style.  Tabriz was the former capital of the Turkmen rulers, and in the early [[Safavid]] period the styles were gradually harmonized in works like the [[Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp]].<ref>Titley, 80; Walther & Wolf, 420-424</ref> But a famous unfinished miniature showing [[Rustam]] asleep, while his horse [[Rakhsh]] fights off a lion, was probably made for this manuscript, but was never finished and bound in, perhaps because its vigorous Tabriz style did not please Tahmasp. It appears to be by Sultan Mohammad, whose later works in the manuscript show a style adapted to the court style of [[Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād|Bizhad]].  It is now in the [[British Museum]].<ref>Canby (1993), 79-80</ref>
===Post-Mongol era (1335–1385)===
[[File:Junaid 002.jpg|thumb|''Divan of [[Khvaju Kirmani]]'', illustrations by [[Junayd (illustrator)|Junayd]], dated 1396, [[Baghdad]].<ref name="Digitised Manuscripts">{{cite web |title=Digitised Manuscripts |url=http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_18113 |website=www.bl.uk}}</ref> This is "the most firmly dated illustrated and high-quality Jalayirid manuscript".<ref name="IS198">{{cite journal |last1=Sturkenboom |first1=Ilse |title=The Paintings of the FreerDivanof Sultan Ahmad b. Shaykh Uvays and a New Taste for Decorative Design |journal=Iran |date=2018 |volume=56 |issue=2 |page=198 |doi=10.1080/05786967.2018.1482727 |s2cid=194905114 |url=https://www.academia.edu/37449326 |issn=0578-6967}}</ref>]]
Once the Ilkhanate fragmented in 1335, various dynasties fought for supremacy in Persian lands: descendants of the Mongols such as the [[Jalayirid Sultanate|Jalayirids]] and the [[Chobanids]], or local dynasties such as the [[Injuids]] and the [[Muzaffarids (Iran)|Muzaffarids]]. They all prolonged the art of the miniatures developed by the Mongols, sometimes with local refinements and variations.


==Chinese influences==
The Jalayirids expanded the limits of refinement and delicacy.<ref name="IS198"/><ref name="Swietochowski">{{cite book |last1=Swietochowski |first1=Marie Lukens |last2=Carboni |first2=Stefano |title=Illustrated Poetry and Epic Images: Persian Painting of the 1330s and 1340s |date=1994 |publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art |isbn=978-0-87099-693-1 |page=75 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=00t6HH7RUCAC&pg=PA75 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="CH">{{cite book |title=The Cambridge History of the Mongol Empire Vol 1 |date=2023 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-316-33742-4 |page=228 |doi=10.1017/9781316337424 |url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337424 |editor-last1=Biran |editor-last2=Kim |editor-first1=Michal |editor-first2=Hodong }}</ref> The Jalayirids led some of the most important changes in [[Persian art]], at the junction between the creations of the [[Il-Khanate]] in the 13-14th century, and those of the [[Safavid Empire|Safavids]] in the 16th century.<ref>{{harvnb|Wing|2016|p=185}} "Some of the most important changes in this distinctly Persian art form took place under the Jalayirids, bridging the masterpiece known as the Great Mongol Shāhnāma, produced in the late Ilkhanid period, with 15th and 16th century Timurid and Safavid painting, commonly considered the pinnacle of the Persian miniature form."</ref> They contributed to the formation of [[Persian miniatures]], especially through the introduction of Chinese-inspired natural landscapes.{{sfn|Wing|2016|pp=185-186}} According to [[Ernst J. Grube]], Jalayirid painting was the source of "modern" Persian-Islamic painting.{{sfn|Wing|2016|p=186}} The characteristics of the Jalayirid school of miniatures were lyrical scenes with elegant small figures in lavish interiors or lush natural surroundings, painted in pastel colors.{{sfn|Wing|2016|p=186}} The subject matters were generally poetic, rather than epic.{{sfn|Wing|2016|p=186}} It is known that some illustrated manuscripts of the Jalayirids were copied and emulated by the [[Timurid Empire|Timurids]]. A written remark by [[Dust Muhammad]] mentions that the Timurid ruler [[Baysunghur]] ordered a book to be made with the exact same specifications (dimensions, arrangement of text, illustrations) as a Jalayirid original.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Soucek |first1=Priscilla |title=Comments on Persian Painting |journal=Iranian Studies |date=1974 |volume=7 |issue=1/2 |page=73}}</ref> In the 16th century, [[Dust Muhammad]] described the Timurid [[Baysunghur]]'s efforts at emulating Jalayirid art, after his [[Timeline of Tabriz|occupation of Tabriz in 1421]] and capture of artists from Tabriz:
[[File:Miraj by Sultan Muhammad.jpg|thumb|[[Isra and Mi'raj|Mi'raj]] of the Prophet by Sultan Muhammad, showing  Chinese-influenced clouds and angels, 1539-43.<ref>see Welch, 95-97</ref>]]
Before Chinese influence was introduced, figures were tied to the ground line and included "backgrounds of solid color", or in "clear accordance with indigenous artistic traditions". However, once influenced by the Chinese, Persian painters gained much more freedom through the Chinese traditions of "unrestricted space and infinite planes". Much of the Chinese influence in Persian art is probably indirect, transmitted through Central Asia. There appear to be no Persian miniatures that are clearly the work of a Chinese artist or one trained in China itself. The most prestigious Chinese painting tradition, of ''literati'' [[landscape painting]] on scrolls, has little influence; instead the closest parallels are with wall-paintings and motifs such as clouds and dragons found in Chinese pottery, textiles, and other decorative arts.<ref>Rawson, Chapter 5</ref> The format and composition of the Persian miniature received strong influence from Chinese paintings.<ref>Schmitz and Desai, 172; Meri, 585</ref>


The Ilkhanid rulers did not convert to Islam for several decades, meanwhile remaining [[Tantric Buddhist]]s or Christians (usually [[Nestorian Christian|Nestorian]]s).  While very few traces now remain, Buddhist and Christian images were probably easily available to Persian artists at this period.<ref>Rawson, 146-147</ref>  Especially in Ilkhanid and Timurid [[Mongol]]-[[Persian people|Persian]] mythological miniatures,  mythical beasts were portrayed in a style close to the Chinese [[qilin]], [[fenghuang]] ([[Phoenix (mythology)|phoenix]]), [[bixie]] and [[Chinese dragon]], though they have a much more aggressive character in Islamic art, and are often seen fighting each other or natural beasts.<ref>Rawson, 169-173</ref>
{{quotation|''His Highness [[Baysunghur|Baysunghur Mirza]] had Master Sidi Ahmad the painter, Khwaja Ali the portraitist and Master Qiwamuddin the bookbinder brought from [[Tabriz]] and ordered that after the pleasing manner of Sultan Ahmad of Baghdad's miscellany, they should produce a book in exactly the same format and layout and with the same scenes depicted. The copying of it was given into the charge of Mawlana Fariduddin Ja 'far. The binding was commissioned of the aforementioned Master Qiwamuddin, by whom inlay in bindings was invented; and Mir Khalil was put in charge of decoration and depiction of scenes.''|Preface to the ''[[Bahram Mirza Album]]'' (extract), by Dust Muhammad.<ref>{{cite book |title=Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters |date=2014 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden Boston |isbn=978-90-04-11961-1 |page=13 |edition=Paperback [edition]}}</ref>}}


== Prominent Persian miniaturists ==
The Injuids attempted to develop an original style as a symbol of their recovered political independence.<ref name="Swietochowski"/>
The workshop tradition and division of labour within both an individual miniature and a book, as described above, complicates the attribution of paintings.  Some are inscribed with the name of the artist, sometimes as part of the picture itself, for example as if painted on tiles in a building, but more often as a note added on the page or elsewhere; where and when being often uncertain.  Because of the nature of the works, literary and historical references to artists, even if they are relied upon, usually do not enable specific paintings to be identified, though there are exceptions.  The reputation of [[Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād|Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād Herawī]], or Behzād, the leading miniaturist of the late Timurid era, and founder of the Safavid school, remained supreme in the [[Persianate]] world, and at least some of his work, and style, can be identified with a degree of confidence, despite a good deal of continuing scholarly debate.<ref>Gray (1930), 57-66; OAO</ref>


[[Sultan Mohammed]], [[Mir Sayyid Ali]], and [[Aqa Mirak]], were leading painters of the next generation, the Safavid culmination of the classic style, whose attributed works are found together in several manuscripts.<ref>Welch, 17-27, and many individual pictures shown</ref>  [[Abd al-Samad]] was one of the most successful Persian painters recruited by the [[Mughal Emperor]]s to work in India.  In the next generation, [[Reza Abbasi]] worked in the Late Safavid period producing mostly album miniatures, and his style was continued by many later painters.<ref>Gray (1930), 80-87</ref> In the 19th century, the miniatures of Abu'l-Hasan Khan Gaffari ([[Sani ol molk]]), active in [[Qajar]] Persia, showed originality, naturalism, and technical perfection.<ref>B. W. Robinson, “[http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/abul-hasan-khan-gaffari-sani-al-molk-1814-66-painter-in-oils-and-miniature-lacquer-artist-and-book-illustrator Abu'l-Hasan Khan Gaffari] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161117010609/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/abul-hasan-khan-gaffari-sani-al-molk-1814-66-painter-in-oils-and-miniature-lacquer-artist-and-book-illustrator |date=2016-11-17 }},” Encyclopædia Iranica, I/3, pp. 306-308</ref>  [[Mahmoud Farshchian]] is a contemporary miniaturist whose style has broadened the scope of this art.
<gallery class="left" widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="5">
 
File:The jackals with lions and their cubs (uncropped). Kalila and Dimna. F.1422.jpg|Jalayirid ''[[:Commons:Category:Kalila and Dimna, 1370-74 (Istanbul University Library F.1422)|Kalila and Dimna]]'' (1370–74)
=== Gallery ===
File:Bahram Gur and Azadeh in hunting place, Istanbul Shahnameh, Shiraz 1331.jpg|Injuid miniature: ''Bahram Gur and Azadeh in hunting place'', Istanbul Shahnameh, Shiraz 1331.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Moravej |first1=Elahe |title=COMPARING THE SCENE OF HUNTING DEER, BAHRAM GUR AND AZADEH IN SHAHNAMEHS OF 1331, 1333 AND 1352 A.D. COPIES |url=https://www.researchgate.net/figure/mage-of-Bahram-and-Azadeh-in-hunting-place-Ferdowsis-Shahnameh-of-1352-AD_fig3_308023286 |year=2016}}</ref>
<gallery widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
File:Frontispiece with Prince and attendants, probably circa 1390, final Muzaffarid period, Shiraz. Kalila and Dimna, BNF Persan 377.jpg|Frontispiece with Prince and attendants, probably circa 1390, final Muzaffarid period, Shiraz.<ref>{{cite web |title=Consultation BNF Persan 377 |url=https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc101600n |website=archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr}}</ref>
 
File:SchoolOfTabriz3.jpg|[[Tabriz]], c.1370, '' Abduction of [[Zal]] by the [[Simurgh]]''
File:Bahram Gur Kills the Dragoon. Firdawsi, Shahnama 1371.(Shiraz, Muzaffarid dyn.) Topkapi Palace Library, Istanbul.jpg|''[[Bahram Gur]] Kills the Dragon'', in a ''[[Shahnameh]]'' of 1371, Shiraz, with a very Chinese dragon
File:Big-Head Shahname.jpg|Page from the Turkmen "Big-head Shahnameh", [[Gilan Province|Gilan]], 1494
File:Behzad advice ascetic.jpg|[[Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād|Behzad]]'s ''Advice of the Ascetic'', c. 1500-1550
File:Bihhzad 001.jpg|Bath-house scene by Behzād
File:Sleeping Rustam.jpg|[[Rustam]] sleeps, while his horse [[Rakhsh]] fends off a tiger. Probably an early work by [[Sultan Mohammed]], 1515–20
File:FOLIO FROM THE SHAHNAMEH OF SHAH TAHMASP, ATTRIBUTED TO AQA MIRAK, CIRCA 1525-35, Sotheby,s.jpg|''[[Fereydun]] in the guise of a dragon tests his sons", from the [[Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp|''Shahnameh'' of Shah Tahmasp]], attributed to [[Aqa Mirak]], circa 1525-35
File:Nizami - Khusraw discovers Shirin bathing in a pool.jpg|[[Khosrow and Shirin|Khusraw discovers Shirin]] bathing in a pool, a favourite scene, here from 1548
Image:Divan von Hafiz.jpg|Poetry, wine and gardens are common elements in later works - 1585
File:The Mantiq al-tair.jpg|Scene from [[Attar of Nishapur|Attar]]'s ''[[The Conference of the Birds|Conference of the Birds]]'', painted c. 1600
File:Riza-yi-Abbasi 008.jpg|''Youth reading'', 1625-6 by [[Reza Abbasi]]
File:Georgian prince by Reza Abbasi.jpg|''Prince Muhammad-Beik of [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]'' - Reza Abbasi, 1620
File:Thousand_and_One_Nights_21.jpg|Illustration of ''One Thousand and One Nights'' by [[Sani ol molk]], Iran, 1853
</gallery>
</gallery>


==Maktab==
===The Timurids and Turkmen (1381–1501)===
=== Style( Persian: (<small>مکتب  maktab) or (مدرسه school)</small>) ===
[[File:Baysunghur Shahname. Faramarz son of Rostam mourns the death of his father and of his uncle Zavareh-1430.jpg|thumb|[[Baysonghor Shahnameh]], 1430. He was a key patron of the [[Herat]] school]]
The maktab of Iranian miniature painting have been named based on the central authority of the ruling empires in the country. Wherever power and wealth were concentrated and considered the capital and seat of government, artists would come to those places willingly or sometimes forcibly. This naming and classification of Iranian miniature painting maktab have been commonly used in Western research and to some extent in Iranian studies.
{{see also|Timurid art|Turkmen style}}
After 1335 the Ilkhanate split into several warring dynasties, all swept aside by the new invasion of [[Timur]] from 1381. He established the [[Timurid dynasty]], bringing a fresh wave of Chinese influence, who were replaced by the [[Qara Qoyunlu]] in 1452, followed by the [[Aq Qoyunlu]] from 1468, who were in turn replaced by the [[Safavid dynasty]] by 1501; they ruled until 1722. After a chaotic period [[Nader Shah]] took control, but there was no long-lived dynasty until the [[Qajar dynasty]], who ruled from 1794 to 1925.<ref>Gray (1976), 309-315, OAO; Rawson, 146-147</ref>


There may be overlaps in the historical periods discussed later due to the dispersion of governments and their capitals within the realm of Iranian culture and art, rather than their political territories.
[[Tabriz]] in the north-west of Iran is the longest established centre of production, and [[Baghdad]] (then under Persian rule) was often important. [[Shiraz]] in the south, sometimes the capital of a sub-ruler, was a centre from the late 14th century, and [[Herat]], now in [[Afghanistan]], was important in the periods when it was controlled from Persia, especially when the Timurid prince [[Baysonqor]] was governor in the 1420s; he was then the leading patron in Persia, commissioning the [[Baysonghor Shahnameh]] and other works. Each centre developed its own style, which were largely reconciled and combined under the Safavids.<ref>Gray (1930), 37-55; Welch, 14-18; OAO</ref>


Some of the Iranian miniature painting maktab include the following (in chronological order):
The schools of Herat, where the [[Timurid dynasty|Timurid]] royal workshops usually were, had developed a style of classical restraint and elegance, and the painters of Tabriz, a more expressive and imaginative style. Tabriz was the former capital of the Turkmen rulers, and in the early [[Safavid Iran|Safavid era]] the styles were gradually harmonized in works like the [[Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp]].<ref>Titley, 80; Walther & Wolf, 420-424</ref> But a famous unfinished miniature showing [[Rostam]] asleep, while his horse [[Rakhsh]] fights off a lion, was probably made for this manuscript, but was never finished and bound in, perhaps because its vigorous Tabriz style did not please Tahmasp. It appears to be by Sultan Mohammad, whose later works in the manuscript show a style adapted to the court style of [[Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād|Bizhad]]. It is now in the [[British Museum]].<ref>Canby (1993), 79-80</ref>


1. '''Baghdad Maktab (or Abbasid Maktab)''': This maktab had a relatively short period during the late 12th century in the capital city of Baghdad under the Abbasid caliphate. It had less influence from Iranian art and showed a stronger inclination towards Byzantine painting and realism. However, some works exhibited influences from Sasanian and Central Asian art.
===Safavid synthesis (1501–1736)===
{{see also|Safavid art}}
[[File:Portrait_of_Sam_Mirza_as_a_patron;_The_feast_of_I’d_begins,_copy_of_Diwan_Hafiz_manuscript.jpg|thumb|[[Shah Tahmasp]] at the ''Celebration of `Id''. Painted by [[Sultan Mohammed]] in [[Tabriz]], circa 1531. ''[[Cartier Hafiz]]''.{{sfn|Blair|2014|pp=240-241}}]]
The Safavid art of the miniature was in many ways a synthesis and an evolution upon the achievements of the previous schools. [[Dust Muhammad]] in the 161th century attributed the current state of the art to the foundational work of [[Ahmad Musa (painter)|Ahmad Musa]] during the Il-Khanate period, while acknowledging the advances made in China and Europe:<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sims |first1=Eleanor |last2=Marshak |first2=Boris Ilʹich |last3=Grube |first3=Ernst J. |title=Peerless Images: Persian Painting and Its Sources |date=1 January 2002 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-09038-3 |page=262 |url=https://archive.org/details/peerlessimagespe0000sims/page/262/mode/1up |language=en}}</ref>
{{quotation|''The custom of portraiture flourished in the lands of [[Cathay]] and the [[Europe|Franks]] until sharp-penned Mercury scrivened the rescript of rule in the name of Sultan [[Abu Sa'id Bahadur Khan|Abusaʿid Khudaybanda]]. Master [[Ahmad Musa (painter)|Ahmad Musa]], who was his father’s pupil, lifted the veil from the face of depiction, and the [style of] depiction that is now current was invented by him.''|[[Dust Muhammad]], introduction to the ''[[Bahram Mirza Album]]'' (1544).<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sims |first1=Eleanor |last2=Marshak |first2=Boris Ilʹich |last3=Grube |first3=Ernst J. |title=Peerless Images: Persian Painting and Its Sources |date=1 January 2002 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-09038-3 |page=262 |url=https://archive.org/details/peerlessimagespe0000sims/page/262/mode/1up |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters |date=2014 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden Boston |isbn=978-90-04-11961-1 |pages=12-13 |edition=Paperback [edition]}}</ref>}}


2. '''Seljuk Maktab''': This maktab emerged during the Seljuk period and was influenced by both Iranian and Central Asian art.
[[Shah Ismail]], by conquering both the Aq Qoyunlu and the Timurids, took over the two dominant Persian artistic schools of the time in the domain of calligraphy and miniatures: the western [[Turkman style|Turkoman school]] based in [[Tabriz]], characterized by vibrant and colorful compositions, which had developed under his uncle [[Yaqub Aq Qoyunlu|Sultan Yaqub Aq Qoyunlu]], and the eastern [[Timurid art|Timurid school]] based in [[Herat]] and brought to new summits by [[Sultan Husayn Bayqara]], which was more balanced and restrained and used subtle colors.{{Sfn|Soudavar|1992|p=159}} Artists from both realms were made to work together, such as [[Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād|Behzad]] from Herat and [[Sultan Mohammed]] from Tabriz, to collaborate on major manuscripts such as the [[Tahmasp Shahnameh|Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp]].{{Sfn|Soudavar|1992|p=159}} This synthesis created the new Safavid imperial style.{{Sfn|Soudavar|1992|p=159}} This new aesthetic also affected traditional crafts, including textiles, carpets, and metalwork, and influenced the styles of [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Turkey]] and [[Mughal Empire|Mughal India]].{{Sfn|Soudavar|1992|p=159}}


3. '''First Tabriz Maktab (or Ilkhanid Maktab)''': This maktab developed during the Ilkhanid period, which was a Mongol dynasty. It had significant connections with Iranian and Central Asian art.
Miniatures from the Safavid and later periods are far more common than earlier ones, but although some prefer the simpler elegance of the early 15th and 16th centuries, most art historians agree in seeing a rise in quality up to the mid-16th century, culminating in a series of superb royal commissions by the Safavid court, such as the [[Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp]] (or Houghton Shahnameh). There was a crisis in the 1540s when Shah [[Tahmasp I]], previously a patron on a large scale, ceased to commission works, apparently losing interest in painting. Some of his artists went to the court of his nephew [[Ibrahim Mirza]], governor of [[Mashad]] from 1556, where there was a brief flowering of painting until the Shah fell out with his nephew in 1565, including a ''[[Haft Awrang]]'', the "Freer Jami". Other artists went to the Mughal court.<ref>Titley, 103; Welch (mostly on Freer Jami after p. 24), 23-27, 31, 98-127; [http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/loveYearning/base.html Freer Gallery] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220104075728/https://asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/loveYearning/base.html/ |date=2022-01-04 }}</ref>


4. '''First Shiraz Maktab''': This maktab emerged in Shiraz and had its own distinctive style.
After this period, and from the 17th century onward, the number of illustrated book manuscript commissions falls off, and the tradition falls into over-sophistication and decline.<ref>OAO; Gray (1930), 74-89; Welch, throughout</ref>


5. '''Jalairid Maktab''': This maktab developed during the Jalairid dynasty and had its own unique characteristics.
==Chinese and European influences==
===Il-Khanid period (1260-1330)===
[[File:The mountains of India, from The Jami‘ al-Tawarikh of Rashid al-Din. Khalili Collection Islamic Art mss 0727 fol 21a det.jpg|thumb|Chinese-style mountains in the [[:Commons:Category:Jami al-Tawarikh (Khalili)|''Jami al-Tawarikh'' (1314-15, Tabriz)]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sims |first1=Eleanor |title=Peerless images : Persian painting and its sources |date=2002 |publisher=New Haven : Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-09038-3 |page=69 |url=https://archive.org/details/peerlessimagespe0000sims/page/155/mode/1up |quote=...these "mountains of India" derive from Chinese landscape-models.}}</ref>]]
Chinese influence on Persian miniature painting is substantial and perceptible.<ref>Sheila S. Blair and Jonathan M. Bloom, ''The Art and Architecture of Islam 1250–1800'', Yale University Press.</ref><ref>Oleg Grabar, ''Mostly Miniatures: An Introduction to Persian Painting'', Princeton University Press.</ref> The tradition, retrospectively named, emerges under the Mongol [[Ilkhanate|(Ilkhanid)]] court in the late 13th and early 14th centuries, within an imperial context that linked Iran to East Asia through the interconnected [[Division of the Mongol Empire|Mongol khanates]].<ref>Thomas T. Allsen, ''Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia'', Cambridge University Press.</ref> From its earliest surviving manifestations, Persian miniature painting develops in dialogue with Chinese pictorial devices, evident in the early adoption of elements such as cloud bands, which often permeate the whole composition, stylised rocks and trees with especially-articulated, knotted trunks, ornamental animal motifs including dragons, uses of multiple horizons, and related compositional strategies, which would be further elaborated and intensified in later periods.<ref>Robert Hillenbrand, ''Islamic Art and Architecture'', Thames & Hudson.</ref>


6. '''Second Shiraz Maktab''': This maktab emerged as a revival of the First Shiraz Maktab and continued its artistic traditions.
These Chinese pictorial devices reached Persian painters primarily through portable media, including textiles; ceramics and porcelain; and portable paintings such as scrolls, albums, and banners. They were also transmitted through decorated objects beyond fine art, including lacquerware, metalwork, carved jade and other hardstone objects, and illustrated maps and cosmological diagrams. Maybe there was influence through Central Asian and Mongol court wall-painting traditions as well. These channels shaped painters’ engagement with Chinese visual logic without necessitating sustained contact with direct Chinese-trained artists.<ref>Sheila S. Blair and Jonathan M. Bloom, ''Islamic Arts'', Phaidon Press.</ref>


7. '''Herat Maktab''': This maktab flourished in Herat under the Timurid dynasty and produced remarkable works.
===Jalayirid period (1330-1410)===
Jalayirid art was characterized by increased naturalism.<ref name="NC537">{{cite book |last1=Neci̇poğlu |first1=Gülru |title=Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450 |date=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42533710/Persianate_Images_between_Europe_and_China_The_Frankish_Manner_ |p=537}}</ref> Parallels have been noted with the contemporary naturalistic [[International Gothic|Late Gothic]] trends, and cross-cultural exchanges, both with the Latin West and Chinese art have been suggested.<ref name="NC537"/> In effect, Christian communities of European merchants (Genoese, Venetian, Pisan, French, Catalan) had been thriving in the Ilkhanid capitals of Tabriz and [[Soltaniyeh]], and although they faltered in the troubles after the end of the Ilkhanate and the [[Black Death]] (1348-1350), were still encouraged by the Jalayirid Sultan Uvays I through correspondence offering road
security and reduced taxes.<ref name="NC536">{{cite book |last1=Neci̇poğlu |first1=Gülru |title=Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450 |date=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42533710/Persianate_Images_between_Europe_and_China_The_Frankish_Manner_ |p=536}}</ref> The artist [[Dust Muhammad]] acknowledged China and Europe while describing the contributions of the great naturalistic artist [[Ahmad Musa (painter)|Ahmad Musa]], active at the end of the [[Ilkhanate]] and during the Jalayirid period:<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Necipoğlu |first1=Gülru |title=The Jalayirid Contribution: A Topkapi Palace Album with Images in the Persianate, Chinese, and European Manners (Ca. 1350–1500) |journal=Ars Orientalis |date=17 February 2026 |volume=55 |issue=0 |doi=10.3998/ars.9312 |url=https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ars/article/id/9312/ |issn=2328-1286}}</ref>
[[File:Eight Figures in European Attire, Baghdad or Tabriz, c. 1370. Istanbul, TSMK, H. 2153, fol. 54v.jpg|thumb|upright=2|''Eight Figures in European Attire'', Jalayirid drawing in European style. Baghdad or Tabriz, c. 1370. [[:Commons:Category:Topkapı Sarayı Album Hazine 2153|''Saray Album'' H.2153]].<ref name="NC539"/>]]
{{quotation|''[T]he custom of portraiture flourished in the lands of [[Cathay]] and the [[Europe|Franks]] until sharp-penned Mercury scrivened the rescript of rule in the name of [[Abu Sa'id Bahadur Khan|Sultan Abusaʿid Khudaybanda]]. Master [[Ahmad Musa (painter)|Ahmad Musa]], who was his father’s pupil, lifted the veil from the face of depiction, and the [style of] depiction that is now current was invented by him. Among the scenes by him that lighted on the page of the world in the reign of the aforementioned emperor, an ''Abusaʿidnama'', a ''[[Kalīla wa-Dimna|Kalila u Dimna]]'', a ''Miʿrajnama'' calligraphed by Mawlana Abdullah Sayrafi, and a ''Tarikh-i Chingizi'' in beautiful script by an unknown hand were in the library of the late emperor [[Sultan Husayn Bayqara|Sultan-Husayn Mirza]].''|Preface to the ''[[Bahram Mirza Album]]'' (extract), by Dust Muhammad.<ref>{{cite book |title=Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters |date=2014 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden Boston |isbn=978-90-04-11961-1 |pages=1213 |edition=Paperback [edition]}}</ref>.}}


8. '''Bukhara Maktab''': This maktab developed in Bukhara and had its own distinct artistic style.
Albums of the period, such as [[:Commons:Category:Topkapı Sarayı Album Hazine 2153|''Saray Album'' H.2153]] or [[:Commons:Category:Topkapı Sarayı Album Hazine 2160|''Saray Album'' H.2160]] often contain foreign work or works "in the manner of", complete with labelled inscriptions of as “Cathayan work” (''kāri khaṭāy/khiṭāy'') or “Frankish work” (''kāri farang/firang'').<ref name="NC539">{{cite book |last1=Neci̇poğlu |first1=Gülru |title=Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450 |date=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42533710/Persianate_Images_between_Europe_and_China_The_Frankish_Manner_ |p=539}}</ref> One such example is the a Europeanizing ink and wash drawing, named ''[[:File:Eight Figures in European Attire, Baghdad or Tabriz, c. 1370. Istanbul, TSMK, H. 2153, fol. 54v.jpg|Eight Figures in European Attire]]'', a work "in the Frankish manner" in the European "[[grisaille]]" style, located next to works attributed to [[Ahmad Musa (painter)|Ahmad Musa]] ([[:File:Bifolio, TSMK, H. 2153, fols. 55r, 54v.jpg|H. 2153, fols. 55r, 54v]]).<ref name="NC542">{{cite book |last1=Neci̇poğlu |first1=Gülru |title=Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450 |date=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42533710/Persianate_Images_between_Europe_and_China_The_Frankish_Manner_ |p=542-544}}</ref> Another Jalayirid work, named ''[[:File:Celestial Vision, Baghdad or Tabriz, c. 1375–1400. Istanbul, TSMK, H. 2153, fol. 120v.jpg|Celestial Vision]]'', combines elements from the arts of Europe (a Christian scene of enlightenment, in the style of [[:File:Gaddi Taddeo Announcement.jpg|Taddeo Gaddi’s ''Annunciation to the Shepherds'' (1327–30)]] of [[:File:Pietro Lorenzetti - Stigmata of St Francis - WGA13527.jpg|Pietro Lorenzetti’s ''Stigmata of St. Francis'' (c. 1320)]], and China (a bent tree, a five-clawed two-horned imperial dragon, Chinese cloud bands).<ref name="NC549">{{cite book |last1=Neci̇poğlu |first1=Gülru |title=Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450 |date=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42533710/Persianate_Images_between_Europe_and_China_The_Frankish_Manner_ |p=549-550}}</ref>


9. '''Second Tabriz Maktab''': This maktab emerged as a revival of the First Tabriz Maktab during the Safavid period and incorporated elements from various artistic traditions.
===Timurid, Turkic and Safavid periods (15th-16th centuries)===
During the [[Timurid Empire|Timurid]] and especially the [[Safavid dynasty|Safavid]] periods, this inherited vocabulary was more fully adopted, adapted, and systematised. Painters expanded earlier devices into increasingly complex pictorial structures, developing more layered landscapes articulated across multiple spatial planes, floating figures, shifting or floating perspectives, and a more continuous, unfolding sense of space.<ref>Stuart Cary Welch, ''Persian Painting: Five Royal Safavid Manuscripts of the Sixteenth Century'', Harvard University Press.</ref> In this later phase, Chinese narrative and figural conventions further informed figural treatment, contributing to lasting transformations in the spatial logic, stylisation, and compositional organisation of Persian painting.<ref>Sheila Canby, ''Persian Painting'', British Museum Press.</ref>


10. '''Qazvin Maktab''': This maktab emerged in Qazvin and had its own artistic characteristics.
<gallery  class="center"  widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="5">
File:Autumn Landscape, polychrome painting, inscribed “Work of Mani (kār-i Mānī),” Tabriz or Baghdad, mid-14th century. Istanbul, TSMK, H. 2153, fol. 68r.jpg|upright|''Autumn Landscape'', a likely Jalayirid work in the Chinese manner. Tabriz or Baghdad, mid-14th century. TSMK, H. 2153.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Necipoğlu |first1=Gülru |title=The Jalayirid Contribution: A Topkapi Palace Album with Images in the Persianate, Chinese, and European Manners (Ca. 1350–1500) |journal=Ars Orientalis |date=17 February 2026 |volume=55 |issue=0 |doi=10.3998/ars.9312 |url=https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ars/article/id/9312/}}</ref>
File:Celestial Vision, Baghdad or Tabriz, c. 1375–1400. Istanbul, TSMK, H. 2153, fol. 120v.jpg|''Celestial Vision'', [[Jalayirid]] drawing combining European and Chinese style. Baghdad or Tabriz, c. 1375–1400. TSMK, H. 2153
File:Flute player under a plum tree.jpg|''Nobles beneath a Blossoming Branch'', [[Shaykhi]], Aq Qoyunlu [[Tabriz]], c. 1470–90.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Diez Albums: Contexts and Contents |date=14 November 2016 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-32348-3 |pages=164, 168 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PBL0DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA164 |language=en}}</ref>
File:Chinese style scene, Aqqoyunlu Turkmen, signed by Shaykhi, ca. 1480. Tabriz. Topkapı Palace Library, H.2153, fol. 146v.jpg|Chinese-style scene, signed by Shaykhi, ca. 1480. Tabriz. [[:Commons:Category:Topkapı Sarayı Album Hazine 2153|Topkapı Palace Library, H.2153]].<ref>{{cite book |title=The Diez Albums: Contexts and Contents |date=14 November 2016 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-32348-3 |page=164 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PBL0DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA164 |language=en}}</ref>
</gallery>


11. '''Isfahan Maktab''': This maktab developed in Isfahan during the Safavid period and played a significant role in the development of Iranian miniature painting.
== Prominent Persian miniaturists ==
The workshop tradition and division of labour within both an individual miniature and a book, as described above, complicates the attribution of paintings. Some are inscribed with the name of the artist, sometimes as part of the picture itself, for example as if painted on tiles in a building, but more often as a note added on the page or elsewhere; where and when being often uncertain. Because of the nature of the works, literary and historical references to artists, even if they are relied upon, usually do not enable specific paintings to be identified, though there are exceptions. The reputation of [[Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād|Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād Herawī]], or Behzād, the leading miniaturist of the late Timurid era, and founder of the Safavid school, remained supreme in the [[Persianate]] world, and at least some of his work, and style, can be identified with a degree of confidence, despite a good deal of continuing scholarly debate.<ref>Gray (1930), 57-66; OAO</ref>


12. '''Qajar Maktab''': This maktab emerged during the Qajar dynasty and had its own distinct style.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
[[Sultan Mohammed]], [[Mir Sayyid Ali]], and [[Aqa Mirak]], were leading painters of the next generation, the Safavid culmination of the classic style, whose attributed works are found together in several manuscripts.<ref>Welch, 17-27, and many individual pictures shown</ref> [[Abd al-Samad]] was one of the most successful Persian painters recruited by the [[Mughal Emperor]]s to work in India. In the next generation, [[Reza Abbasi]] worked in the Late Safavid period producing mostly album miniatures, and his style was continued by many later painters.<ref>Gray (1930), 80-87</ref> In the 19th century, the miniatures of Abu'l-Hasan Khan Gaffari ([[Sani ol molk]]), active in [[Qajar]] Persia, showed originality, naturalism, and technical perfection.<ref>B. W. Robinson, "[http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/abul-hasan-khan-gaffari-sani-al-molk-1814-66-painter-in-oils-and-miniature-lacquer-artist-and-book-illustrator Abu'l-Hasan Khan Gaffari] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161117010609/http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/abul-hasan-khan-gaffari-sani-al-molk-1814-66-painter-in-oils-and-miniature-lacquer-artist-and-book-illustrator |date=2016-11-17 }}," Encyclopædia Iranica, I/3, pp. 306-308</ref> [[Mahmoud Farshchian]] is a contemporary miniaturist whose style has broadened the scope of this art.


=== Gallery ===
<gallery widths="200px" heights="200px" perrow="4">
File:SchoolOfTabriz3.jpg|[[Tabriz]], c.1370, ''Abduction of [[Zal]] by the [[Simurgh]]''
File:Bahram Gur Kills the Dragoon. Firdawsi, Shahnama 1371.(Shiraz, Muzaffarid dyn.) Topkapi Palace Library, Istanbul.jpg|''[[Bahram Gur]] Kills the Dragon'', in a ''[[Shahnameh]]'' of 1371, Shiraz, with a very Chinese dragon
File:Big-Head Shahname.jpg|Page from the Turkmen "Big-head Shahnameh", [[Gilan Province|Gilan]], 1494
File:Behzad advice ascetic.jpg|[[Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād|Behzad]]'s ''Advice of the Ascetic'', c. 1500–1550
File:Sleeping Rustam.jpg|[[Rostam]] sleeps, while his horse [[Rakhsh]] fends off a lion. Probably an early work by [[Sultan Mohammed]], 1515–20
File:FOLIO FROM THE SHAHNAMEH OF SHAH TAHMASP, ATTRIBUTED TO AQA MIRAK, CIRCA 1525-35, Sotheby,s.jpg|''[[Fereydun]] in the guise of a dragon tests his sons'', from the [[Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp|''Shahnameh'' of Shah Tahmasp]], attributed to [[Aqa Mirak]], circa 1525-35
File:Nizami - Khusraw discovers Shirin bathing in a pool.jpg|[[Khosrow and Shirin|Khosraw discovers Shirin]] bathing in a pool, a favourite scene, here from 1548
Image:Divan von Hafiz.jpg|Poetry, wine and gardens are common elements in later works - 1585
File:The Mantiq al-tair.jpg|Scene from [[Attar of Nishapur|Attar]]'s ''[[The Conference of the Birds|Conference of the Birds]]'', painted c. 1600
File:Riza-yi-Abbasi 008.jpg|''Youth reading'', 1625–26 by [[Reza Abbasi]]
File:Thousand_and_One_Nights_21.jpg|Illustration of ''One Thousand and One Nights'' by [[Abu'l-Hasan Sani al-Mulk]], Iran, 1853
</gallery>


'''1)Tabriz Maktab of Art (First Period)'''
== Intangible cultural heritage ==
 
{{Main|UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists}}
With the Mongol invasion and the establishment of the Ilkhanate rule, Maragheh and Tabriz transformed into cultural centers. The Ilkhanate rule had two important consequences for Iranian painting. The first was the transfer of elements and techniques of Chinese art to Iran, and the second was the establishment of a form of collective artistic education in workshops and royal libraries. The Tabriz Maktab of Art, also known as the Mongol or Ilkhanid Maktab, along with its subsequent period, the Jalayirid period, formed the main foundation of Iranian painting. During this period, artists sought to integrate visual and pictorial art. One of the notable events of this period was the creation of a cultural complex near Tabriz, known as Rab'-e Rashidi, by the order of Rashid al-Din Fazlullah Hamadani, the vizier of Ghazan Khan. This place served as a gathering place for Iranian and foreign artists, scholars, and calligraphers. One of the works produced in Rab'-e Rashidi is the Comprehensive Book of Chronicles, which was worked on by numerous artists in various styles. The First Tabriz style brought about fundamental changes compared to its previous period, the Seljuk period. The technique of hatching, the depiction of clouds and mountains, the rendering of faces, composition, and shading all borrowed from Chinese art, while the use of silver color and the depiction of garments recalled Byzantine and Mesopotamian art. However, the figurative style of the human figures and their arrangement in the composition remained Iranian in nature. The scenes became more expansive, and we can even see a portion of the sky in the images. The peak of the First Tabriz art can be seen in the Demotte Shahnameh, where the influence of foreign arts is more evident. Nevertheless, this imitation gave rise to new visual patterns and concepts. For example, the dragon in Chinese art symbolizes nature and fertility, but the Iranian painter portrays Bahram fighting the dragon as a symbol of overcoming evil, indicating a disregard for their original meanings and a mere adoption of the Chinese pattern. One of the renowned artists of this period is Ahmad Musa.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
{{Infobox intangible heritage
 
| Image      =
 
| Caption    =
'''2)Jalayirid Maktab of Art'''
| ICH        = Art of miniature
 
| Countries  = Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkey, and Uzbekistan
After the death of the last Mongol Ilkhan, Abu Sa'id, power struggles ensued among Mongol dynasties, and eventually, the Jalayirid dynasty seized power and established their rule in Tabriz and Baghdad. During this period, book illustration received significant attention, and artworks from the Ilkhanid period were collected and preserved. Despite the numerous tensions of this period, many artists, especially during the reign of Sultan Ahmad Jalayir, received patronage, with many kings themselves reciting poetry and engaging in painting. Although the artists continued the tradition of the Ilkhanid maktab, they also advanced experimental approaches. The outstanding result of this period is the Divan of Khwaju Kermani, which includes the signature of an artist named Junayd Baghdadi, making it the oldest known signature of an Iranian painter. In Junayd's paintings and generally in the Jalayirid maktab, the spaces expanded completely, and the paintings occupy an entire page. The figures in the images are slender and tall, and architectural spaces depict both interiors and exteriors simultaneously for the first time. In this period, books were written in a new style of Nasta'liq calligraphy, and the colors became more vibrant compared to the Ilkhanid period, while the issue of the relationship between humans and nature was resolved. Overall, the artworks of the Ilkhanid and Jalayirid periods can be divided into three main categories. The first category consists of pure Iranian works, which, even if influenced by other arts, are combined with Iranian elements. The second category includes paintings that combine Iranian and Chinese art, with a more tangible influence of Chinese art, and the third category consists of paintings abundant in Chinese elements and are almost foreign in nature. The artworks of the Jalayirid period belong to the first category, where Chinese elements are hardly seen.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
| ID          = 01598
 
| Region      =
 
| Year        = 2020
'''3)The Maktab of Shiraz'''
| Session    = 15th
 
| List        = Representative
During the 8th century AH (14th century CE), while the Ilkhanid and Jalayirid maktabs were flourishing in Tabriz and Baghdad, an independent artistic movement was taking place in the city of Shiraz. When the Mongols invaded, the rulers of Fars managed to protect the city through diplomacy and intelligence, allowing it to continue its existence under the same previous rulers. Many Iranian artists and intellectuals sought refuge in Shiraz under the patronage of local dynasties, namely the Al-e Injou and later the Al-e Mozaffar. Consequently, Shiraz became a central hub for preserving and continuing the ancient traditions and arts of Iran, such as Seljuk art and resistance against foreign influences.
}}
 
In 2020, UNESCO inscribed the art of miniature on its Representative List of the [[intangible cultural heritage|Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity]] upon the nomination of four countries in which it is an important element of their culture: Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkey, and Uzbekistan.<ref name="unesco">{{cite web|title=Art of miniature|url=https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/art-of-miniature-01598|website=[[UNESCO]] Intangible Cultural Heritage|access-date=14 January 2024}}</ref>
Significant developments during this period include the flourishing of Persian poetry and literature, and the emergence of renowned figures like Saadi and Hafez. Calligraphy workshops thrived in Iran, and the production and illustration of Shahnameh (the Persian epic) had widespread popularity in Shiraz. The illustrations of Shirazi books were simple and reminiscent of Seljuk-era manuscripts, characterized by flat and vibrant colors, large figures, and shallow spaces, evoking the ancient traditions of Iranian art.
 
In the Maktab of Shiraz, the central theme is humanity, while other motifs fill the surrounding spaces. After the death of Abu Sa'id, the last ruler of the Injou dynasty, Shiraz and some other cities became artistically independent. For instance, in cities like Behbahan, a unique style of nature illustration without human presence can be observed. During the Mozaffarid period, the depiction of lyrical poems (ghazals) received more attention, and the spaces became more expansive. Although the Maktab of Shiraz had its distinct path compared to Tabriz and Baghdad, there was artistic and cultural exchange between these cities, influencing one another. It can be inferred that the vibrant colors of the Maktab of Shiraz influenced Baghdad and Tabriz, while in return, the spacious compositions from Tabriz and Baghdad reached Shiraz. The production of books in Shiraz was so extensive that its products were exported to other countries such as Turkey and India, representing a tradition known as the "commercial style" that endured until the Safavid era in Isfahan.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
 
'''4)The Herat school (Maktab-e Herat)'''
 
was an artistic movement in Persian painting during the medieval period, originating in the city of Herat in present-day Afghanistan. The maktab flourished under the patronage of Baysonqor Mirza, who succeeded Shah Rukh and established Herat as his capital. During Baysonqor Mirza's reign, the workshop of the royal court in Herat became a melting pot of artistic influences from Shiraz, Tabriz, and even Chinese painting traditions. These diverse influences converged to give birth to the distinctive style of the Herat Maktab. The artistic style of the Baysonqor Mirza period transformed into a formal and refined manner, exemplified in the illustrations of the Baysonqori Shahnameh. Notable artists of this period included Jafar Tabrizi, Gawwam al-Din, Mir Khalil, and Khwaja Ghiyath al-Din. Despite the upheavals in Herat after Shah Rukh's death until the reign of Hussain Bayqara, independent artworks from artists such as Maulana Vali Allah and Mansur were produced. The establishment of Sultan Husayn Bayqara's rule and the presence of his minister, Mir Ali-Shir Nava'i, marked a splendid era for art in Iran. Various art forms thrived, and artists gained recognition. Mir Ali-Shir Nava'i fostered a gathering of intellectuals who came together regardless of social status, sharing ideas and artworks. Notable members of this gathering included Wa'iz Kashifi, Kamal al-Din Behzad, and Sultan Ali Mashhadi. During this period, alongside the traditional masters who continued the Baysonqori style, a new generation of talented and innovative artists emerged, introducing new experiences to Persian painting. For example, Haji Mohammad Haravi, known as Mohammad Siyah Qalam, incorporated Iranian satire and grotesque elements in his works. Kamal al-Din Behzad focused on human figures and depicted everyday life in courtly paintings. In this period, the art of portraiture gradually gained popularity, often attributed to Kamal al-Din Behzad. Some portraits of contemporary rulers like Sultan Husayn and Shah Bayqara have survived from this time. This style was also influenced by the arrival of Gentile Bellini, who came to Istanbul at the invitation of an Ottoman Sultan, and later had an impact on Timurid artists. The Herat Maktab encompassed various artistic trends and exhibited a high degree of diversity. However, the works of the Sultan Husayn and Kamal al-Din Behzad period, known as the Kamaleddin Behzad Maktab, are particularly well-known. Generally, it can be said that colors became more vibrant in the Herat Maktab, and the compositions became more complex, featuring circular and intersecting elements. Human activities and details received more attention, and the workshop tradition became a fixed practice in Persian painting. The Herat Maktab, especially the style of Kamal al-Din Behzad, had a direct influence on subsequent periods, such as the Second Tabriz Maktab. Following the rise of the Shaybanid dynasty in Herat, Mohammad Khan Shaybani moved the capital to Bukhara, leading many artists of the Herat Maktab to migrate there. This migration gave rise to the Bukhara Maktab, which followed in the footsteps of the Herat Maktab. The prominent artist of the Bukhara Maktab was Mahmud Muzahhib, who continued the style of Kamal al-Din Behzad. The characteristics of the Bukhara Maktab included rich colors, intricate details within simple forms, short figures, and frontal structures.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
'''5)The Second Shiraz School'''
 
In the city of Shiraz during the Timurid period, specifically in the late 8th century, two Timurid rulers, Sultan Iskandar and Sultan Ibrahim, governed Shiraz and greatly influenced its art. Sultan Iskandar gathered the artists of Shiraz once again after the Timurid invasions. It is likely that Pir Ahmad Baghshamali was active in Sultan Iskandar's workshop. The painters of Sultan Iskandar depicted his battles, which became known as "The Selected Battles of Sultan Iskandar." The court style of Sultan Iskandar had already emerged before the establishment of the Herat School and demonstrated the earliest fusion of Iran's exquisite painting styles, such as the Jalairid and Al-Muzaffar styles. The use of lapis lazuli blue color, sponge-like rocks in the sky's horizon, slender and colorful figures, and embellished architectural structures with arabesque patterns were characteristic of the Iskandar School, which later directly influenced the Herat School. Sultan Iskandar was deposed due to conflicts with Shah Rukh Timurid and was succeeded by Ibrahim Sultan, Shah Rukh's son. Ibrahim Sultan's reign brought about significant transformations in the Shiraz style. The figures became more strongly designed, and the colors became more muted, with a strong tendency towards compositional harmony evident in the artworks. Calligraphic elements gained particular importance in the composition, and fixed rules for arranging and formatting texts were established, which became inseparable from the Shiraz style until the late 10th century AH. The general rule was to place two or four inscriptions at the top and bottom of the image, creating a symmetrical and geometric structure within the artwork, with significant subjects often appearing in the central section and beneath the horizon line. Notable works from this period include the Khamsa of Nizami and the Shahnameh of Ibrahim Sultan.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
'''6)The Turkmen Style'''
 
During the 8th century AH, two Turkmen tribes simultaneously occupied the western regions of Iran. Initially, the Qara Qoyunlu gained power and made Tabriz their capital, followed by the Aq Qoyunlu, who seized control over all of Iran except for Khorasan. Overall, the Turkmen style was a mixture of the Herat, Tabriz, Shiraz, and Baghdad schools. They established a royal workshop similar to the Timurid court workshop and employed both local and non-local painters. The result was a new and distinct style characterized by robust figures, round faces with arched eyebrows, and small mouths. The works produced in the Tabriz region, due to the strong tradition of landscape painting in the early Tabriz school, emphasized nature in Turkmen painting, giving rise to fantastical and surreal landscapes. As previously mentioned, there was a commercial style in Shiraz during the first period of the Shiraz School, which continued with the arrival of the Turkmen. The non-courtly Turkmen style was simple and unadorned, yet it can be considered suitable for commercial purposes due to its commercial nature and high production. Nevertheless, these images are very explicit and clear in terms of description. One of the Shirazi artists believed to be the creator of this commercial style is Farhad. He is the same artist who illustrated the Khavarannameh manuscript written by Ibn Husam Khusfi. These illustrations have innovative compositions that vividly demonstrate Farhad's imagination. The final and most advanced phase of the Turkmen style occurred during the reign of Yakub Beg, the Aq Qoyunlu ruler. Artists such as Sheikh and Darvish Mohammad produced images of the Khamsa of Nizami during that period. These images feature imaginative landscapes and diverse colors, with nature surpassing humanity. The power of imagination in these images is so high that the peaks of rocky mountains transform into human and animal forms. This poetic depiction of nature also found its way into the Safavid school through Sultan Muhammad.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
 
'''7)Tabriz School 2'''
 
With the establishment of the Safavid government, Shah Ismail chose Tabriz as the center of his rule and gathered Turkmen painters, including Sultan Muhammad, in Tabriz. Artists from the Herat school, such as Sheikhzadeh and Kamal al-Din Behzad, initially produced artistic works under the rule of the Safavid government in Herat and then migrated to Tabriz during the reign of Shah Tahmasb. One notable work produced in Safavid Herat is the "Zafarnama" (Book of Victory), characterized by intricate compositions, diverse colors, and strong design, displaying elements of Behzad's style. In comparison to his Timurid-era works in the Herat school, Behzad's works in the Tabriz school exhibit less vibrant spirit and subdued colors, possibly influenced by the taste of the court patrons. One of the main characteristics we observe in Safavid paintings is the presence of a specific type of turban known as the "Qizilbash turban." The fusion of Western and Eastern Iranian painting styles gave rise to an authentic and complete style, exemplified by Shahnameh-e Tahmasbi (Tahmasb's Shahnameh) and Khamsa-e Tahmasbi (Tahmasb's Khamsa), which were the result of collaborative efforts by a group of artists. These two works represent a juxtaposition of two main stylistic poles: Sultan Muhammad's style, the Turkmen style, and the contrasting style of the Calligraphers of the Behzad School. It seems that in images dominated by nature and slightly surreal, the Turkmen and Sultan Muhammad schools had an influence, while the Calligraphers of the Behzad School created works that focused more on human figures and human relationships. The paintings in the Tabriz school became much busier, featuring more figures within a scene. This led to more complex compositions, a higher variety of colors, and a tendency to push the figures out of the space. In Tabriz School 2, although there is no perspective, the principles of authentic Iranian painting are adhered to. However, due to the complex relationships between elements and architecture, the images appear both two-dimensional and three-dimensional simultaneously. The synchronicity of events and places reached its peak in Tabriz School 2, where one can witness various events taking place within a single image, yet perceiving the works as cohesive and unified. Tabriz School 2 came to a halt with the capital's relocation to Qazvin, and after Shah Tahmasb's withdrawal of support, many artists dispersed to various cities. On the other hand, in Mashhad, Ibrahim Mirza, a young Safavid prince, established a workshop and brought together skilled artists from Tabriz and local artists in Mashhad. Thus, the Safavid Tabriz style continued in Mashhad with new approaches. One of the most significant works produced in Mashhad is the "Haft Orang" by Jami. Overall, in Mashhad, we encounter new characteristics, including emphasis on color through white spots, dominance of soft and curvilinear lines, presence of ancient trees, fragmented rocks, and slender figures with long necks and round faces. During the twenty years that Mashhad continued its activities, there was not much book illustration flourishing in the Safavid capital of Qazvin, and only a few works were produced following the Mashhad style during a short period, particularly during the reign of Ismail II.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
 
'''8)"Maktab-i Isfahan'''
 
After a tumultuous decade, Shah Abbas ascended the Safavid throne and relocated the capital to Isfahan. During this period, all the industrial arts flourished and served the taste of the Shah, resulting in the infiltration of Western art into the underlying fabric of society. Architecture, textiles, carpets, and ceramics of this era had numerous enthusiastic admirers, yet, with a fair critique, one can find a decline in vitality and creativity in almost all the arts of this period. However, the field of painting had a different and pioneering movement, as it was almost independent of court patronage. In this period, even before the Isfahan School, we encounter a new style where artists produced works independent of books on a large scale. The emergence of this phenomenon depended on two factors: a decrease in court support and the growth of the merchant class. The taste of the Shahs was changing, and artists could not rely solely on court patronage. Consequently, they turned towards capitalists and nobles. As they lacked the financial capability to produce a complete book, they contented themselves with single-page illustrations. In the midst of this, a young and talented artist named Reza Abbasi appeared and perfected this style of painting. Reza Abbasi's technique was based on the value of line, giving volume to the work through the thickness and thinness of lines. In his paintings, figures were usually large and detached from the surroundings. Later, Moin Mosavar continued Reza Abbasi's style by combining it with his own personal style. Generally, it can be said that the connection between painting and literature had weakened, and the line had surpassed color in the art of painting. These two events led artists to observe their surroundings and document various everyday events. Workshop traditions gradually weakened, and individual worth of each artist became more independent during this period. As a result, signing and long inscriptions became prevalent, particularly in the works of Moin Mosavar."Wall painting was another art form that emerged in the 11th century AH (17th century CE) in the Safavid palaces of Isfahan and continued the style of Qazvin School wall paintings. The compositions of the wall paintings resemble the illustrations found in books, but when executed on a large scale, they lose the delicacy found in books. Gradually, with the arrival of Europeans, Western painting styles entered Iranian paintings and captivated the taste of the Safavid Shahs. In the late period, we witness two main trends: the first being the distinctive and independent style of painters such as Reza Abbasi and Moin Mosavar, and the second being painters like Mohammad Zaman, who were influenced by European naturalism, and their works were referred to as the "School of Italy in Isfahan". The first trend continued until the end of Moin Mosavar's life, while the inclination towards naturalism grew and became more formalized, marking a new beginning in the Iranian painting style.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>  


'''9)The Qajar School'''of painting emerged during the Zand period and continued into the Qajar era and slightly beyond. This style holds a prominent position as a cohesive and school-based style in Iranian painting, encompassing all the thematic and practical features of a painting school. It was primarily developed through the fusion of traditional Iranian painting characteristics with elements and techniques borrowed from European painting. Although there were some works in a similar style during the Safavid period in Iran, which were referred to as "Europeanization," it found its distinct form primarily during the Zand period and continued into the Qajar era. A genre of folk painting known as "Qahveh-Khaneh-gari" (coffeehouse painting) also emerged during this time.<ref>{{Citation |title=نگارگری ایرانی |date=2023-06-11 |url=https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |work=ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد |access-date=2023-06-19 |language=fa |archive-date=2023-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701135249/https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%A7%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&oldid=37308611 |url-status=live }}</ref>
In their rationale for inscription on the list, the nominators highlighted that "The patterns of the miniature represent beliefs, worldviews and lifestyles in a pictorial fashion and also gained a new character through the Islamic influence. While there are stylistic differences between them, the art of miniature as practised by the submitting States Parties shares crucial features. In all cases, it is a traditional craft typically transmitted through mentor-apprentice relationships (non-formal education) and considered as an integral part of each society's social and cultural identity".<ref name="unesco"/>


==In later culture==
==In later culture==
The French painter [[Henri Matisse]] said he was inspired by Persian miniatures. He visited the Munich 1910 exhibition of Persian miniatures and carpets, and noted that:
The French painter [[Henri Matisse]] said he was inspired by Persian miniatures. He visited the 1910 Munich exhibition of Persian miniatures and carpets, and noted that:
"the Persian miniatures showed me the possibility of my sensations. That art had devices to suggest a greater space, a really plastic space. It helped me to get away from intimate painting."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Walsh |first1=Judy |title=Matisse, Persian miniatures and Modernism |url=https://www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog/Examplehttps//www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog-page-url/2017/12/12/new-post-title |website=judy walsh artwork |access-date=2019-12-17 |archive-date=2019-12-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217170052/https://www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog/Examplehttps//www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog-page-url/2017/12/12/new-post-title |url-status=live }}</ref>
"the Persian miniatures showed me the possibility of my sensations. That art had devices to suggest a greater space, a really plastic space. It helped me to get away from intimate painting".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Walsh |first1=Judy |title=Matisse, Persian miniatures and Modernism |url=https://www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog/Examplehttps//www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog-page-url/2017/12/12/new-post-title |website=judy walsh artwork |date=7 February 2018 |access-date=2019-12-17 |archive-date=2019-12-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217170052/https://www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog/Examplehttps//www.judywalsh-artwork.com/blog-page-url/2017/12/12/new-post-title |url-status=live }}</ref>


Persian miniatures are mentioned in the novel ''[[My Name Is Red]]'' by [[Orhan Pamuk]].
Persian miniatures are mentioned in the novel ''[[My Name Is Red]]'' by [[Orhan Pamuk]].
Line 190: Line 178:


==References==
==References==
*Balafrej, Lamia. ''The Making of the Artist in Late Timurid Painting'', Edinburgh University Press, 2019, {{ISBN|9781474437431}}  
* Balafrej, Lamia. ''The Making of the Artist in Late Timurid Painting'', Edinburgh University Press, 2019, {{ISBN|9781474437431}}
*Brend, Barbara. ''Islamic art'', Harvard University Press, 1991, {{ISBN|0-674-46866-X}}, 9780674468665
* {{cite book |last1=Blair |first1=Sheila |title=Text and image in medieval Persian art |date=2014 |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |location=Edinburgh |isbn=978-0748655786 }}
*Canby, Sheila R. (ed) (2009). ''Shah Abbas; The Remaking of Iran'', 2009, British Museum Press, {{ISBN|978-0-7141-2452-0}}
* Brend, Barbara. ''Islamic art'', Harvard University Press, 1991, {{ISBN|0-674-46866-X}}, 9780674468665
*Canby, Sheila R. (1993), ''Persian Painting'', 1993, British Museum Press, {{ISBN|9780714114590}}
* Canby, Sheila R. (ed) (2009). ''Shah Abbas; The Remaking of Iran'', 2009, British Museum Press, {{ISBN|978-0-7141-2452-0}}
*Crill, Rosemary, and Jarilwala, Kapil. ''The Indian Portrait: 1560-1860'', 2010, National Portrait Gallery Publications, {{ISBN|1-85514-409-3}}, 978 1855144095
* Canby, Sheila R. (1993), ''Persian Painting'', 1993, British Museum Press, {{ISBN|9780714114590}}
*("Gray 1930") Gray, Basil, ''Persian Painting'', Ernest Benn, London, 1930
* Crill, Rosemary, and Jarilwala, Kapil. ''The Indian Portrait: 1560-1860'', 2010, National Portrait Gallery Publications, {{ISBN|1-85514-409-3}}, 978 1855144095
*("Gray 1976") Gray, Basil, and others in Jones, Dalu & Michell, George, (eds); ''The Arts of Islam'', [[Arts Council of Great Britain]], 1976, {{ISBN|0-7287-0081-6}}
* ("Gray 1930") Gray, Basil, ''Persian Painting'', Ernest Benn, London, 1930
*Gruber, Christiane, ''Representations of the Prophet Muhammad in Islamic painting'', in Gulru Necipoglu, Karen Leal eds., [[Muqarnas (journal)|Muqarnas]], Volume 26, 2009, BRILL, {{ISBN|90-04-17589-X}}, 9789004175891, [https://books.google.com/books?id=Gq6obUbnqsMC&dq=%22Depiction+of+Muhammad%22+Muqarnas&pg=PA247 google books]
* ("Gray 1976") Gray, Basil, and others in Jones, Dalu & Michell, George, (eds); ''The Arts of Islam'', [[Arts Council of Great Britain]], 1976, {{ISBN|0-7287-0081-6}}
*[[Josef W. Meri|Meri, Josef W.]] ''Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia'', 2005, Psychology Press, {{ISBN|0-415-96690-6}}
* Gruber, Christiane, ''Representations of the Prophet Muhammad in Islamic painting'', in Gulru Necipoglu, Karen Leal eds., [[Muqarnas (journal)|Muqarnas]], Volume 26, 2009, BRILL, {{ISBN|90-04-17589-X}}, 9789004175891, [https://books.google.com/books?id=Gq6obUbnqsMC&dq=%22Depiction+of+Muhammad%22+Muqarnas&pg=PA247 google books]
*[[Jessica Rawson|Rawson, Jessica]], ''Chinese Ornament: The Lotus and the Dragon'', 1984, British Museum Publications, {{ISBN|0-7141-1431-6}}
* {{cite book | last = Hillenbrand | first = Carole | title = The Medieval Turks: Collected Essays | year = 2021 | publisher = Edinburgh University Press | isbn = 978-1474485944 }}
*"OAO", Sims, Eleanor, and others. [[Oxford Art Online]] (subscription required), ''Islamic art, §III, 4: Painted book illustration'' (v) ''c 1250–c 1500'', and (vi) ''c 1500–c 1900'', accessed Jan 21, 2011
* [[Josef W. Meri|Meri, Josef W.]] ''Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia'', 2005, Psychology Press, {{ISBN|0-415-96690-6}}
*Roxburgh, David J. 2000. ''The Study of Painting and the Arts of the Book'', in [[Muqarnas (journal)|Muqarnas]], XVII, BRILL.
* [[Jessica Rawson|Rawson, Jessica]], ''Chinese Ornament: The Lotus and the Dragon'', 1984, British Museum Publications, {{ISBN|0-7141-1431-6}}
*[[Wheeler M. Thackston|Thackston, Wheeler McIntosh]]. ''Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters'', Volume 10 of Studies and sources in Islamic art and architecture: Supplements to Muqarnas, BRILL, 2001, {{ISBN|90-04-11961-2}}, {{ISBN|978-90-04-11961-1}}
* "OAO", Sims, Eleanor, and others. [[Oxford Art Online]] (subscription required), ''Islamic art, §III, 4: Painted book illustration'' (v) ''c 1250–c 1500'', and (vi) ''c 1500–c 1900'', accessed Jan 21, 2011
*Titley, Norah M. ''Persian Miniature Painting, and Its Influence on the Art of Turkey and India: the British Library collections'', 1983, University of Texas Press, {{ISBN|0-292-76484-7}}
* Roxburgh, David J. 2000. ''The Study of Painting and the Arts of the Book'', in [[Muqarnas (journal)|Muqarnas]], XVII, BRILL.
*[[Stuart Cary Welch|Welch, Stuart Cary]]. ''Royal Persian Manuscripts'', Thames & Hudson, 1976, {{ISBN|0-500-27074-0}}
* {{cite book |last1=Soudavar |first1=Abolala |title=Art of the Persian courts : selections from the Art and History Trust Collection |date=1992 |publisher=New York : Rizzoli |isbn=978-0-8478-1660-6 |url=https://archive.org/details/artofpersiancour0000soud/page/172/mode/2up}}
* [[Wheeler M. Thackston|Thackston, Wheeler McIntosh]]. ''Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters'', Volume 10 of Studies and sources in Islamic art and architecture: Supplements to Muqarnas, BRILL, 2001, {{ISBN|90-04-11961-2}}, {{ISBN|978-90-04-11961-1}}
* Titley, Norah M. ''Persian Miniature Painting, and Its Influence on the Art of Turkey and India: the British Library collections'', 1983, University of Texas Press, {{ISBN|0-292-76484-7}}
* [[Stuart Cary Welch|Welch, Stuart Cary]]. ''Royal Persian Manuscripts'', Thames & Hudson, 1976, {{ISBN|0-500-27074-0}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
Line 212: Line 203:
* [[Basil William Robinson|Robinson, B. W.]], ''Islamic painting and the arts of the book'', London, Faber and Faber, 1976
* [[Basil William Robinson|Robinson, B. W.]], ''Islamic painting and the arts of the book'', London, Faber and Faber, 1976
* [[Basil William Robinson|Robinson, B. W.]], ''Persian paintings in the India Office Library, a descriptive catalogue'', London, Sotheby Parke Bernet, 1976
* [[Basil William Robinson|Robinson, B. W.]], ''Persian paintings in the India Office Library, a descriptive catalogue'', London, Sotheby Parke Bernet, 1976
*Schmitz, Barbara, and Desai, Ziyaud-Din A. ''Mughal and Persian paintings and illustrated manuscripts in the Raza Library, Rampur'', 2006, Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, {{ISBN|81-7305-278-6}}
* [[Barbara Schmitz|Schmitz, Barbara]], and Desai, Ziyaud-Din A. ''Mughal and Persian paintings and illustrated manuscripts in the Raza Library, Rampur'', 2006, Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, {{ISBN|81-7305-278-6}}
*"Iranica", [[Stuart Cary Welch|Welch, Stuart Cary]], and others, [http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/art-in-iran-ix-safavid Art in Iran]:vii. Islamic pre-Safavid, ix. Safavid to Qajar Periods, in [[Encyclopædia Iranica]] (online, accessed January 27, 2011)
* "Iranica", [[Stuart Cary Welch|Welch, Stuart Cary]], and others, [http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/art-in-iran-ix-safavid Art in Iran]:vii. Islamic pre-Safavid, ix. Safavid to Qajar Periods, in [[Encyclopædia Iranica]] (online, accessed January 27, 2011)
*{{cite book |author1=Swietochowski, Marie Lukens  |author2=Babaie, Sussan  |name-list-style=amp | title= ''Persian drawings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art'' | location=New York | publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art | year=1989 | url= http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15324coll10/id/90639/rec/3 | isbn=0870995642}}
* {{cite book |author1=Swietochowski, Marie Lukens  |author2=Babaie, Sussan  |name-list-style=amp | title= ''Persian drawings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art'' | location=New York | publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art | year=1989 | url= http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15324coll10/id/90639/rec/3 | isbn=0870995642}}
*{{cite book | author=Welch, S.C. | title= ''A king's book of kings: the Shah-nameh of Shah Tahmasp'' | location=New York | publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art | year=1972 | url= http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15324coll10/id/36222/rec/1 | isbn=9780870990281}}
* {{cite book | author=Welch, S.C. | title= ''A king's book of kings: the Shah-nameh of Shah Tahmasp'' | location=New York | publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art | year=1972 | url= http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15324coll10/id/36222/rec/1 | isbn=9780870990281}}
*{{cite book |author1=Swietochowski, Marie  |author2=Carboni, Stefano |name-list-style=amp | title= ''Illustrated poetry and epic images : Persian painting of the 1330s and 1340s'' | location=New York | publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art | year=1994| url= http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15324coll10/id/81182}}
* {{cite book |author1=Swietochowski, Marie  |author2=Carboni, Stefano |name-list-style=amp | title= ''Illustrated poetry and epic images : Persian painting of the 1330s and 1340s'' | location=New York | publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art | year=1994| url= http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15324coll10/id/81182}}


== External links ==
==External links==
{{Commons category|Persian miniatures}}
{{Commons category|Persian miniatures}}
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20171028142344/http://shahnama.caret.cam.ac.uk/new/jnama/page/ The ''Shahnameh'' Project], Cambridge University - huge database of miniatures
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20171028142344/http://shahnama.caret.cam.ac.uk/new/jnama/page/ The ''Shahnameh'' Project], Cambridge University database of miniatures (archived 28 October 2017)
* [http://www.iranchamber.com/art/articles/history_iranian_miniature.php A brief history of Persian Miniature by Katy Kianush. Iran Chamber Society]
* [http://www.iranchamber.com/art/articles/history_iranian_miniature.php A brief history of Persian Miniature by Katy Kianush. Iran Chamber Society]
* [http://www.cbl.ie/cbl_image_gallery/collection/list.aspx?collectionId=2 Chester Beatty Library Image Gallery] mixed Islamic images
* [http://www.cbl.ie/cbl_image_gallery/collection/list.aspx?collectionId=2 Chester Beatty Library Image Gallery] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181101015455/http://www.cbl.ie/cbl_image_gallery/collection/list.aspx?collectionId=2 |date=2018-11-01 }} mixed Islamic images
*[http://afghanistan.asiasociety.org/timeline/37/CE/1000 Video on Behzad] from the Asia Society, US
* [http://afghanistan.asiasociety.org/timeline/37/CE/1000 Video on Behzad] from the Asia Society, US
* [http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/VisualPoetry/riza1.htm Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian]
* [http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/VisualPoetry/riza1.htm Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070810214227/http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/VisualPoetry/riza1.htm |date=2007-08-10 }}
* [http://kilyos.ee.bilkent.edu.tr/~history/topkapi1.html Miniatures from the Topkapi Museum]
* [http://kilyos.ee.bilkent.edu.tr/~history/topkapi1.html Miniatures from the Topkapi Museum]
* [https://amazingiran.media/negargari/ Negargari: The Breathtaking World of Persian Miniature Art]


{{Islamic art}}
{{Islamic art}}
Line 244: Line 236:
[[Category:Iranian inventions]]
[[Category:Iranian inventions]]
[[Category:Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity]]
[[Category:Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity]]
[[Category:Intangible Cultural Heritage of Iran]]

Latest revision as of 17:08, 7 March 2026


Yusuf and Zulaikha (Joseph chased by Potiphar's wife), by Behzād. Bustan of Sa'di, Herat, 1488, created for Timurid ruler Sultan Husayn Bayqara

A Persian miniature (Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.) is a small Persian painting on paper, whether a book illustration or a separate work of art intended to be kept in an album of such works called a muraqqa. The techniques are broadly comparable to the Western Medieval and Byzantine traditions of miniatures in illuminated manuscripts.

Although there is an equally well-established Persian tradition of wall-painting, the survival rate and state of preservation of miniatures is better, and miniatures are much the best-known form of Persian painting in the West, and many of the most important examples are in Western, or Turkish, museums. Miniature painting became a significant genre in Persian art in the 13th century, receiving Chinese influence after the Mongol conquests, and the highest point in the tradition was reached in the 15th and 16th centuries. The tradition continued, under some Western influence, after this, and has many modern exponents. The Persian miniature was the dominant influence on other Islamic miniature traditions, principally the Ottoman miniature in Turkey, and the Mughal miniature in the Indian subcontinent.

Persian art under Islam had never completely forbidden the human figure, and in the miniature tradition the depiction of figures, often in large numbers, is central. This was partly because the miniature is a private form, kept in a book or album and only shown to those the owner chooses. It was therefore possible to be more free than in wall paintings or other works seen by a wider audience. The Quran and other purely religious works are not known to have been illustrated in this way, though histories and other works of literature may include religiously related scenes, including those depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad, after 1500 usually without showing his face.[1]

As well as the figurative scenes in miniatures, which this article concentrates on, there was a parallel style of non-figurative ornamental decoration which was found in borders and panels in miniature pages, and spaces at the start or end of a work or section, and often in whole pages acting as frontispieces. In Islamic art this is referred to as "illumination", and manuscripts of the Quran and other religious books often included considerable number of illuminated pages.[2] The designs reflected contemporary work in other media, in later periods being especially close to book-covers and Persian carpets, and it is thought that many carpet designs were created by court artists and sent to the workshops in the provinces.[3]

In later periods miniatures were increasingly created as single works to be included in albums called muraqqa, rather than illustrated books. This allowed non-royal collectors to afford a representative sample of works from different styles and periods.

Style[edit | edit source]

Camp scene from late in the classic period, with no frame (c. 1556-1565), Freer Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.; Majnun (at top wearing orange) spies on his beloved Layla (standing in tent doorway).

The bright and pure colouring of the Persian miniature is one of its most striking features. Normally all the pigments used are mineral-based ones which keep their bright colours very well if kept in proper conditions, the main exception being silver, mostly used to depict water, which will oxidize to a rough-edged black over time.[4] The conventions of Persian miniatures changed slowly; faces are normally youthful and seen in three-quarters view, with a plump rounded lower face better suited to portraying typical Central Asian or Chinese features than those of most Persians. Lighting is even, without shadows or chiaroscuro. Walls and other surfaces are shown either frontally, or as at (to modern eyes) an angle of about 45 degrees, often giving the modern viewer the unintended impression that a building is (say) hexagonal in plan. Buildings are often shown in complex views, mixing interior views through windows or "cutaways" with exterior views of other parts of a facade. Costumes and architecture are always those of the time.[5]

Many figures are often depicted, with those in the main scene normally rendered at the same size, and recession (depth in the picture space) indicated by placing more distant figures higher up in the space. More important figures may be somewhat larger than those around them, and battle scenes can be very crowded indeed. Great attention is paid to the background, whether of a landscape or buildings, and the detail and freshness with which plants and animals, the fabrics of tents, hangings or carpets, or tile patterns are shown is one of the great attractions of the form. The dress of figures is equally shown with great care, although artists understandably often avoid depicting the patterned cloth that many would have worn. Animals, especially the horses that very often appear, are mostly shown sideways on; even the love-stories that constitute much of the classic material illustrated are conducted largely in the saddle, as far as the prince-protagonist is concerned.[6] Landscapes are very often mountainous (the plains that make up much of Persia are rarely attempted), this being indicated by a high undulating horizon, and outcrops of bare rock which, like the clouds in the normally small area of sky left above the landscape, are depicted in conventions derived from Chinese art. Even when a scene in a palace is shown, the viewpoint often appears to be from a point some metres in the air.[7]

The earliest miniatures appeared unframed horizontally across the page in the middle of text, following Byzantine and Arabic precedents, but in the 14th century the vertical format was introduced, perhaps influenced by Chinese scroll-paintings. This is used in all the luxury manuscripts for the court that constitute the most famous Persian manuscripts, and the vertical format dictates many characteristics of the style.[8]

Saki, album miniature by Reza Abbasi, 1609

The miniatures normally occupy a full page, later sometimes spreading across two pages to regain a square or horizontal "landscape" format. There are often panels of text or captions inside the picture area, which is enclosed in a frame, eventually of several ruled lines with a broader band of gold or colour. The rest of the page is often decorated with dense designs of plants and animals in a muted grisaille, often gold and brown; text pages without miniatures often also have such borders. In later manuscripts, elements of the miniature begin to expand beyond the frame, which may disappear on one side of the image, or be omitted completely.[9]

Another later development was the album miniature, conceived as a single picture rather than a book illustration, though such images may be accompanied by short lyric poems. The withdrawal of Shah Tahmasp I from commissioning illustrated books in the 1540s probably encouraged artists to transfer to these cheaper works for a wider circle of patrons.[10] Albums or muraqqas were assembled by collectors with album miniatures, specimen pages of calligraphy, and miniatures taken from older books, to which border paintings were often added when they were remounted. Album miniatures usually showed a few figures on a larger scale, with less attention to the background, and tended to become drawings with some tints of coloured wash, rather than fully painted.

In the example at right the clothes are fully painted, and the background uses the gold grisaille style earlier reserved for marginal decoration, as in the miniature at the head of the article. Many were individual portraits, either of notable figures (but initially rarely portraits of rulers), or of idealized beautiful youths. Others were scenes of lovers in a garden or picnics. From about the middle of the 16th century these types of images became dominant, but they gradually declined in quality and originality and tended towards conventional prettiness and sentimentality.[11]

Books were sometimes refurbished and added to after an interval of many years, adding or partly repainting miniatures, changing the border decoration, and making other changes, not all improvements.[12] The Conference of the Birds miniature in the gallery below is an addition of 1600 to a manuscript of over a century earlier, and elements of the style appear to represent an effort to match the earlier miniatures in the book.[13] The famous painting Princes of the House of Timur was first painted in 1550-55 in Persia for the exiled Mughal prince Humayun, who largely began the Mughal miniature tradition by taking back Persian miniaturists when he gained the throne. It was then twice updated in India (c.1605 and 1628) to show later generations of the royal house.[14] The dimensions of the manuscripts covered a range not dissimilar to typical modern books, though with a more vertical ratio; many were as small as a modern paperback, others larger. Shah Tamasp's Shahnameh stood 47 cm high, and one exceptional Shahnameh from Tabriz of c. 1585 stood 53 cm high.[15]

Artists and technique[edit | edit source]

Nighttime in a City: urban activity in the Safavid capital of Tabriz, painted circa 1540 for Shah Tahmasp (Sackler Museum, 1958.76).[16][17]

In the classic period artists were exclusively male, and normally grouped in workshops, of which the royal workshop (not necessarily in a single building) was much the most prestigious, recruiting talented artists from the bazaar workshops in the major cities. However the nature of the royal workshop remains unclear, as some manuscripts are recorded as being worked on in different cities, rulers often took artists with them on their travels, and at least some artists were able to work on private commissions.[18] As in Europe, sons very often followed their father into the workshop, but boys showing talent from any background might be recruited; at least one notable painter was born a slave. There were some highly placed amateur artists, including Shah Tahmasp I (reigned 1524–1576), who was also one of the greatest patrons of miniatures. Persian artists were highly sought after by other Islamic courts, especially those of the Ottoman and Mughal Empires, whose own traditions of miniature were based on Persian painting but developed rather different styles.[19]

The work was often divided between the main painter, who drew the outlines, and less senior painters who coloured in the drawing. In Mughal miniatures at least, a third artist might do just the faces. Then there might be the border paintings; in most books using them these are by far the largest area of painted material as they occur on text pages as well. The miniatures in a book were often divided up between different artists, so that the best manuscripts represent an overview of the finest work of the period. The scribes or calligraphers were normally different people, on the whole regarded as having a rather higher status than the artists - their names are more likely to be noted in the manuscript.

Royal librarians probably played a significant role in managing the commissions; the extent of direct involvement by the ruler himself is normally unclear. The scribes wrote the main text first, leaving spaces for the miniatures, presumably having made a plan for these with the artist and the librarian. The book covers were also richly decorated for luxury manuscripts, and when they too have figurative scenes these presumably used drawings by the same artists who created the miniatures. Paper was the normal material for the pages, unlike the vellum normally used in Europe for as long as the illuminated manuscript tradition lasted. The paper was highly polished, and when not given painted borders might be flecked with gold leaf.[20]

A unique survival from the Timurid period, found "pasted inconspicuously" in a muraqqa in the Topkapi Palace is thought to be a report to Baysunghur from his librarian. After a brief and high-flown introduction, "Petition from the most humble servants of the royal library, whose eyes are as expectant of the dust from the hooves of the regal steed as the ears of those who fast are for the cry of Allahu akbar ..." it continues with very businesslike and detailed notes on what each of some twenty-five named artists, scribes and craftsmen has been up to over a period of perhaps a week: "Amir Khalil has finished the waves in two sea-scenes of the Gulistan and will begin to apply colour. ... All the painters are working on painting and tinting seventy-five tent-poles .... Mawlana Ali is designing a frontispiece illumination for the Shahnama. His eyes were sore for a few days."[21] Apart from book arts, designs for tent-makers, tile-makers, woodwork and a saddle are mentioned, as is the progress of the "begim's little chest".[22]

History[edit | edit source]

The ancient Persian religion of Manichaeism made considerable use of images; not only was the founding prophet Mani (c.216–276) a professional artist, at least according to later Islamic tradition, but one of the sacred books of the religion, the Arzhang, was illustrated by the prophet himself, whose illustrations (probably essentially cosmological diagrams rather than images with figures) were regarded as part of the sacred material and always copied with the text. Unfortunately, the religion was repressed strongly from the Sasanian era and onwards so that only tiny fragments of Manichean art survive. These no doubt influenced the continuing Persian tradition, but little can be said about how. It is also known that Sasanian palaces had wall-paintings, but only fragments of these have survived.[23]

There are narrative scenes in pottery (Mina'i ceramics), though it is hard to judge how these relate to lost contemporary book painting.[24] Recent scholarship has noted that, although surviving early examples are now uncommon, human figurative art was also a continuous tradition in Islamic lands in secular contexts (such as literature, science, and history); as early as the 9th century, such art flourished during the Abbasid Caliphate (c. 749-1258, across Spain, North Africa, Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Mesopotamia, and Persia).[25]

Earliest illustrated manuscript in Persian (c.1250)[edit | edit source]

Rabī cuts his adversary in half. Battle scene, in Varka and Golshah, mid-13th century Seljuk Anatolia.

The great period of the Persian miniature began when Persia was ruled by a succession of foreign dynasties, who came from the east and north. Before the Mongol Ilkhanate (1253–1353), narrative representations are only known in Persia in architecture and ceramics.[26] With the large tradition of Arabic manuscripts in the 12th-13th centuries, illustrated manuscripts probably also existed in Persia, but none are known.[27][26]

The earliest known illustrated manuscript in the Persian language is an early 13th century copy of the epic Varka and Golshah, which was most probably created in Konya in Central Anatolia, under the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum.[28][29][30][31] It is the only Persian-language illustrated manuscript securely datable to before Mongol conquest, and it can be dated to circa 1250.[32][33]

Mongol era (1260–1335)[edit | edit source]

Juvaynī sitting and writing in front of Mongol emir Arghun Aqa. Frontispiece of Tārīkh-i Jahān-Gushā "The History of The World Conqueror" (damaged), completed in A.H. 689/ 1290 CE. Bibliothèque Nationale de France (Suppl. Pers. 205).[34][35] It shows the "origin of the Metropolitan style" at the Ilkhanid court.[36]

The traumatic Mongol invasion of 1219 onwards established the Ilkhanate as a branch of the Mongol Empire, and despite the huge destruction of life and property, the new court had a galvanising effect on book painting, importing many Chinese works and probably artists, with their long-established tradition of narrative painting, and sponsoring a cultural revival and the creation of history-related literary works.[37] Baghdad was conquered in 1258, and Mosul in 1262.

The earliest known Persian-language manuscript of Kalīla wa-Dimna (Topkapl Palace Museum Library, H.363) appears around this time: it is dated to 1265-80, and was likely produced in Baghdad, or possibly Mosul.[38][39] Another known illustrated Persian manuscript under the Mongols is the Tarikh-i Jahangushay (1290), commissioned by the Mongol emir Arghun Aqa, also one of the earliest examples of "Metropolitan style" of the Mongol Ilkhanid court, followed by the 1297-1299 manuscript Manafi' al-hayawan (Ms M. 500), commissioned by Mongol ruler Ghazan.[37] The Ilkhanids continued to migrate between summer and winter quarters, which together with other travels for war, hunting and administration, made the portable form of the illustrated book the most suitable vehicle for painting, as it also was for mobile European medieval rulers.[40] The Great Mongol Shahnameh, now dispersed, is the outstanding manuscript of the following period.[41]

It was only in the 14th century that the practice began of commissioning illustrated copies of classic works of Persian poetry, above all the Shahnameh of Ferdowsi (940–1020) and the Khamsa of Nizami, which were to contain many of the finest miniatures. Previously book illustration, of works in both Arabic and Persian, had been concentrated in practical and scientific treatises, often following at several removes the Byzantine miniatures copied when ancient Greek books were translated.[42] However a 14th-century flowering of Arabic illustrated literary manuscripts in Syria and Egypt collapsed at the end of the century, leaving Persia the undisputed leader in Islamic book illustration.[43] Many of the best miniatures from early manuscripts were removed from their books in later centuries and transferred to albums, several of which are now in Istanbul; this complicates tracing the art history of the period.[44]

Post-Mongol era (1335–1385)[edit | edit source]

Divan of Khvaju Kirmani, illustrations by Junayd, dated 1396, Baghdad.[45] This is "the most firmly dated illustrated and high-quality Jalayirid manuscript".[46]

Once the Ilkhanate fragmented in 1335, various dynasties fought for supremacy in Persian lands: descendants of the Mongols such as the Jalayirids and the Chobanids, or local dynasties such as the Injuids and the Muzaffarids. They all prolonged the art of the miniatures developed by the Mongols, sometimes with local refinements and variations.

The Jalayirids expanded the limits of refinement and delicacy.[46][47][48] The Jalayirids led some of the most important changes in Persian art, at the junction between the creations of the Il-Khanate in the 13-14th century, and those of the Safavids in the 16th century.[49] They contributed to the formation of Persian miniatures, especially through the introduction of Chinese-inspired natural landscapes.[50] According to Ernst J. Grube, Jalayirid painting was the source of "modern" Persian-Islamic painting.[51] The characteristics of the Jalayirid school of miniatures were lyrical scenes with elegant small figures in lavish interiors or lush natural surroundings, painted in pastel colors.[51] The subject matters were generally poetic, rather than epic.[51] It is known that some illustrated manuscripts of the Jalayirids were copied and emulated by the Timurids. A written remark by Dust Muhammad mentions that the Timurid ruler Baysunghur ordered a book to be made with the exact same specifications (dimensions, arrangement of text, illustrations) as a Jalayirid original.[52] In the 16th century, Dust Muhammad described the Timurid Baysunghur's efforts at emulating Jalayirid art, after his occupation of Tabriz in 1421 and capture of artists from Tabriz:

His Highness Baysunghur Mirza had Master Sidi Ahmad the painter, Khwaja Ali the portraitist and Master Qiwamuddin the bookbinder brought from Tabriz and ordered that after the pleasing manner of Sultan Ahmad of Baghdad's miscellany, they should produce a book in exactly the same format and layout and with the same scenes depicted. The copying of it was given into the charge of Mawlana Fariduddin Ja 'far. The binding was commissioned of the aforementioned Master Qiwamuddin, by whom inlay in bindings was invented; and Mir Khalil was put in charge of decoration and depiction of scenes.

— Preface to the Bahram Mirza Album (extract), by Dust Muhammad.[53]

The Injuids attempted to develop an original style as a symbol of their recovered political independence.[47]

The Timurids and Turkmen (1381–1501)[edit | edit source]

Baysonghor Shahnameh, 1430. He was a key patron of the Herat school

After 1335 the Ilkhanate split into several warring dynasties, all swept aside by the new invasion of Timur from 1381. He established the Timurid dynasty, bringing a fresh wave of Chinese influence, who were replaced by the Qara Qoyunlu in 1452, followed by the Aq Qoyunlu from 1468, who were in turn replaced by the Safavid dynasty by 1501; they ruled until 1722. After a chaotic period Nader Shah took control, but there was no long-lived dynasty until the Qajar dynasty, who ruled from 1794 to 1925.[56]

Tabriz in the north-west of Iran is the longest established centre of production, and Baghdad (then under Persian rule) was often important. Shiraz in the south, sometimes the capital of a sub-ruler, was a centre from the late 14th century, and Herat, now in Afghanistan, was important in the periods when it was controlled from Persia, especially when the Timurid prince Baysonqor was governor in the 1420s; he was then the leading patron in Persia, commissioning the Baysonghor Shahnameh and other works. Each centre developed its own style, which were largely reconciled and combined under the Safavids.[57]

The schools of Herat, where the Timurid royal workshops usually were, had developed a style of classical restraint and elegance, and the painters of Tabriz, a more expressive and imaginative style. Tabriz was the former capital of the Turkmen rulers, and in the early Safavid era the styles were gradually harmonized in works like the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp.[58] But a famous unfinished miniature showing Rostam asleep, while his horse Rakhsh fights off a lion, was probably made for this manuscript, but was never finished and bound in, perhaps because its vigorous Tabriz style did not please Tahmasp. It appears to be by Sultan Mohammad, whose later works in the manuscript show a style adapted to the court style of Bizhad. It is now in the British Museum.[59]

Safavid synthesis (1501–1736)[edit | edit source]

Shah Tahmasp at the Celebration of `Id. Painted by Sultan Mohammed in Tabriz, circa 1531. Cartier Hafiz.[60]

The Safavid art of the miniature was in many ways a synthesis and an evolution upon the achievements of the previous schools. Dust Muhammad in the 161th century attributed the current state of the art to the foundational work of Ahmad Musa during the Il-Khanate period, while acknowledging the advances made in China and Europe:[61]

The custom of portraiture flourished in the lands of Cathay and the Franks until sharp-penned Mercury scrivened the rescript of rule in the name of Sultan Abusaʿid Khudaybanda. Master Ahmad Musa, who was his father’s pupil, lifted the veil from the face of depiction, and the [style of] depiction that is now current was invented by him.

— Dust Muhammad, introduction to the Bahram Mirza Album (1544).[62][63]

Shah Ismail, by conquering both the Aq Qoyunlu and the Timurids, took over the two dominant Persian artistic schools of the time in the domain of calligraphy and miniatures: the western Turkoman school based in Tabriz, characterized by vibrant and colorful compositions, which had developed under his uncle Sultan Yaqub Aq Qoyunlu, and the eastern Timurid school based in Herat and brought to new summits by Sultan Husayn Bayqara, which was more balanced and restrained and used subtle colors.[64] Artists from both realms were made to work together, such as Behzad from Herat and Sultan Mohammed from Tabriz, to collaborate on major manuscripts such as the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp.[64] This synthesis created the new Safavid imperial style.[64] This new aesthetic also affected traditional crafts, including textiles, carpets, and metalwork, and influenced the styles of Ottoman Turkey and Mughal India.[64]

Miniatures from the Safavid and later periods are far more common than earlier ones, but although some prefer the simpler elegance of the early 15th and 16th centuries, most art historians agree in seeing a rise in quality up to the mid-16th century, culminating in a series of superb royal commissions by the Safavid court, such as the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp (or Houghton Shahnameh). There was a crisis in the 1540s when Shah Tahmasp I, previously a patron on a large scale, ceased to commission works, apparently losing interest in painting. Some of his artists went to the court of his nephew Ibrahim Mirza, governor of Mashad from 1556, where there was a brief flowering of painting until the Shah fell out with his nephew in 1565, including a Haft Awrang, the "Freer Jami". Other artists went to the Mughal court.[65]

After this period, and from the 17th century onward, the number of illustrated book manuscript commissions falls off, and the tradition falls into over-sophistication and decline.[66]

Chinese and European influences[edit | edit source]

Il-Khanid period (1260-1330)[edit | edit source]

Chinese-style mountains in the Jami al-Tawarikh (1314-15, Tabriz).[67]

Chinese influence on Persian miniature painting is substantial and perceptible.[68][69] The tradition, retrospectively named, emerges under the Mongol (Ilkhanid) court in the late 13th and early 14th centuries, within an imperial context that linked Iran to East Asia through the interconnected Mongol khanates.[70] From its earliest surviving manifestations, Persian miniature painting develops in dialogue with Chinese pictorial devices, evident in the early adoption of elements such as cloud bands, which often permeate the whole composition, stylised rocks and trees with especially-articulated, knotted trunks, ornamental animal motifs including dragons, uses of multiple horizons, and related compositional strategies, which would be further elaborated and intensified in later periods.[71]

These Chinese pictorial devices reached Persian painters primarily through portable media, including textiles; ceramics and porcelain; and portable paintings such as scrolls, albums, and banners. They were also transmitted through decorated objects beyond fine art, including lacquerware, metalwork, carved jade and other hardstone objects, and illustrated maps and cosmological diagrams. Maybe there was influence through Central Asian and Mongol court wall-painting traditions as well. These channels shaped painters’ engagement with Chinese visual logic without necessitating sustained contact with direct Chinese-trained artists.[72]

Jalayirid period (1330-1410)[edit | edit source]

Jalayirid art was characterized by increased naturalism.[73] Parallels have been noted with the contemporary naturalistic Late Gothic trends, and cross-cultural exchanges, both with the Latin West and Chinese art have been suggested.[73] In effect, Christian communities of European merchants (Genoese, Venetian, Pisan, French, Catalan) had been thriving in the Ilkhanid capitals of Tabriz and Soltaniyeh, and although they faltered in the troubles after the end of the Ilkhanate and the Black Death (1348-1350), were still encouraged by the Jalayirid Sultan Uvays I through correspondence offering road security and reduced taxes.[74] The artist Dust Muhammad acknowledged China and Europe while describing the contributions of the great naturalistic artist Ahmad Musa, active at the end of the Ilkhanate and during the Jalayirid period:[75]

Eight Figures in European Attire, Jalayirid drawing in European style. Baghdad or Tabriz, c. 1370. Saray Album H.2153.[76]

[T]he custom of portraiture flourished in the lands of Cathay and the Franks until sharp-penned Mercury scrivened the rescript of rule in the name of Sultan Abusaʿid Khudaybanda. Master Ahmad Musa, who was his father’s pupil, lifted the veil from the face of depiction, and the [style of] depiction that is now current was invented by him. Among the scenes by him that lighted on the page of the world in the reign of the aforementioned emperor, an Abusaʿidnama, a Kalila u Dimna, a Miʿrajnama calligraphed by Mawlana Abdullah Sayrafi, and a Tarikh-i Chingizi in beautiful script by an unknown hand were in the library of the late emperor Sultan-Husayn Mirza.

— Preface to the Bahram Mirza Album (extract), by Dust Muhammad.[77].

Albums of the period, such as Saray Album H.2153 or Saray Album H.2160 often contain foreign work or works "in the manner of", complete with labelled inscriptions of as “Cathayan work” (kāri khaṭāy/khiṭāy) or “Frankish work” (kāri farang/firang).[76] One such example is the a Europeanizing ink and wash drawing, named Eight Figures in European Attire, a work "in the Frankish manner" in the European "grisaille" style, located next to works attributed to Ahmad Musa (H. 2153, fols. 55r, 54v).[78] Another Jalayirid work, named Celestial Vision, combines elements from the arts of Europe (a Christian scene of enlightenment, in the style of Taddeo Gaddi’s Annunciation to the Shepherds (1327–30) of Pietro Lorenzetti’s Stigmata of St. Francis (c. 1320), and China (a bent tree, a five-clawed two-horned imperial dragon, Chinese cloud bands).[79]

Timurid, Turkic and Safavid periods (15th-16th centuries)[edit | edit source]

During the Timurid and especially the Safavid periods, this inherited vocabulary was more fully adopted, adapted, and systematised. Painters expanded earlier devices into increasingly complex pictorial structures, developing more layered landscapes articulated across multiple spatial planes, floating figures, shifting or floating perspectives, and a more continuous, unfolding sense of space.[80] In this later phase, Chinese narrative and figural conventions further informed figural treatment, contributing to lasting transformations in the spatial logic, stylisation, and compositional organisation of Persian painting.[81]

Prominent Persian miniaturists[edit | edit source]

The workshop tradition and division of labour within both an individual miniature and a book, as described above, complicates the attribution of paintings. Some are inscribed with the name of the artist, sometimes as part of the picture itself, for example as if painted on tiles in a building, but more often as a note added on the page or elsewhere; where and when being often uncertain. Because of the nature of the works, literary and historical references to artists, even if they are relied upon, usually do not enable specific paintings to be identified, though there are exceptions. The reputation of Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād Herawī, or Behzād, the leading miniaturist of the late Timurid era, and founder of the Safavid school, remained supreme in the Persianate world, and at least some of his work, and style, can be identified with a degree of confidence, despite a good deal of continuing scholarly debate.[85]

Sultan Mohammed, Mir Sayyid Ali, and Aqa Mirak, were leading painters of the next generation, the Safavid culmination of the classic style, whose attributed works are found together in several manuscripts.[86] Abd al-Samad was one of the most successful Persian painters recruited by the Mughal Emperors to work in India. In the next generation, Reza Abbasi worked in the Late Safavid period producing mostly album miniatures, and his style was continued by many later painters.[87] In the 19th century, the miniatures of Abu'l-Hasan Khan Gaffari (Sani ol molk), active in Qajar Persia, showed originality, naturalism, and technical perfection.[88] Mahmoud Farshchian is a contemporary miniaturist whose style has broadened the scope of this art.

Gallery[edit | edit source]

Intangible cultural heritage[edit | edit source]

Template:Infobox intangible heritage In 2020, UNESCO inscribed the art of miniature on its Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity upon the nomination of four countries in which it is an important element of their culture: Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkey, and Uzbekistan.[89]

In their rationale for inscription on the list, the nominators highlighted that "The patterns of the miniature represent beliefs, worldviews and lifestyles in a pictorial fashion and also gained a new character through the Islamic influence. While there are stylistic differences between them, the art of miniature as practised by the submitting States Parties shares crucial features. In all cases, it is a traditional craft typically transmitted through mentor-apprentice relationships (non-formal education) and considered as an integral part of each society's social and cultural identity".[89]

In later culture[edit | edit source]

The French painter Henri Matisse said he was inspired by Persian miniatures. He visited the 1910 Munich exhibition of Persian miniatures and carpets, and noted that: "the Persian miniatures showed me the possibility of my sensations. That art had devices to suggest a greater space, a really plastic space. It helped me to get away from intimate painting".[90]

Persian miniatures are mentioned in the novel My Name Is Red by Orhan Pamuk.

See also[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Gruber, throughout; see Welch, 95-97 for one of the most famous examples, illustrated below
  2. In the terminology of Western illuminated manuscripts, "illumination" usually covers both narrative scenes and decorative elements.
  3. Canby (2009), 83
  4. Gray (1930), 22-23
  5. Gray (1930), 22-28; Welch, 35
  6. Gray (1930), 25-26, 44-50
  7. Gray (1930), 25-26, 48-49, 64
  8. Sims
  9. OAO (3, ii and elsewhere)
  10. Brend, 164-165
  11. OAO, Sims; Gray (1930), 74-81
  12. OAO
  13. Metropolitan Museum of Art Archived 2011-03-07 at the Wayback Machine "The Conference of the Birds": Page from a manuscript of the Mantiq al-Tayr (The Language of the Birds) of Farid al-Din cAttar, Isfahan (63.210.11). In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–.
  14. Crill and Jarilwala, 50-51; Art Fund Archived 2011-06-17 at the Wayback Machine with image. The painting uses miniature techniques on cotton, and is much larger than most miniatures.
  15. Uluc, 73
  16. Melville 2021, p. 119, note 43.
  17. Sarabi, Mina (10 May 2023). "Architectural and Spatial Design studies of Sahibabad, Tabriz, Iran in the Persian Miniature Painting "Nighttime in a Palace"". JACO Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient Quarterly (38). doi:10.22034/JACO.2022.366374.1270.
  18. Roxburgh (2000), 6-8
  19. Welch, 12-14
  20. Gray (1930), 22-26; Welch, 12-14
  21. Thackston, 43-44
  22. Thackston, 43-44; a good number of those named are mentioned in other sources.
  23. Gray (1930), 27-28
  24. Sims
  25. J. Bloom & S. Blair (2009). Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. pp. 192 and 207. ISBN 978-0-19-530991-1. Archived from the original on 2023-07-01. Retrieved 2020-11-02.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Bloom, Jonathan; Blair, Sheila (14 May 2009). Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set. OUP USA. p. 214-215. ISBN 978-0-19-530991-1.
  27. Ettinghausen, Richard (1959). "On Some Mongol Miniatures". Kunst des Orients. 3: 44–45. ISSN 0023-5393. JSTOR 20752311.
  28. Porter, Yves; Flood, Finbarr Barry (2023). Under the adorned dome: four essays on the arts of Iran and India. Leiden Boston: Brill. p. 17, note 30. ISBN 978-90-04-54971-5. The Varqa and Gulshāh was probably made in the Konya sultanate.
  29. Hillenbrand 2021, p. 208 "The earliest illustrated Persian manuscript, signed by an artist from Khuy in north-west Iran, was produced between 1225 and 1250, almost certainly in Konya. (Cf. A. S. Melikian-Chirvani, ‘Le roman de Varqe et Golsâh’, Arts Asiatiques XXII (Paris, 1970))"
  30. Blair, Sheila S. (19 January 2020). Islamic Calligraphy. Edinburgh University Press. p. 366. ISBN 978-1-4744-6447-5.
  31. Necipoğlu, Gülru; Leal, Karen A. (1 October 2009). Muqarnas. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-17589-1.
  32. Bloom, Jonathan; Blair, Sheila (14 May 2009). Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set. OUP USA. p. 214–215. ISBN 978-0-19-530991-1.
  33. Ettinghausen, Richard (1977). Arab painting. New York : Rizzoli. p. 91, 92, 162 commentary. ISBN 978-0-8478-0081-0. The two scenes in the top and bottom registers (...) may be strongly influenced by contemporary Seljuk Persian (...) like those in the recently discovered Varqeh and Gulshah (p.92) (...) In the painting the facial cast of these Turks is obviously reflected, and so are the special fashions and accoutrements they favored. (p.162, commentary on image from p.91){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  34. 34.0 34.1 Jaber, Shady (2021). "The Paintings of al-Āthār al-Bāqiya of al-Bīrūnī: A Turning Point in Islamic Visual Representation" (PDF). Lebanese American University: Figure 5.
  35. "Consultation Supplément Persan 205". archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr. Bibliothèque Nationale de France.
  36. Bloom, Jonathan; Blair, Sheila (14 May 2009). Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set. OUP USA. p. 215. ISBN 978-0-19-530991-1.
  37. 37.0 37.1 Bloom, Jonathan; Blair, Sheila (14 May 2009). Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set. OUP USA. p. 215. ISBN 978-0-19-530991-1.
  38. "KALILA WA DEMNA iii. ILLUSTRATIONS". Encyclopaedia Iranica. The earliest illustrated Arabic manuscripts that have survived date from the beginning of the 13th century, while the earliest illustrated Persian example (Istanbul, Topkapi Saray Library, MS H. 363) is from the last quarter of that century.
  39. Contadini, Anna (2010). Arab painting: text and image in illustrated Arabic manuscripts (2nd rev. ed.). Leiden Boston: Brill. p. 140. ISBN 978-90-04-18630-9. ...the earliest surviving Persian manuscript of the text, H. 363 of the Topkapı Saray Library, datable to 1265–80.
  40. Sims
  41. Canby (1993), 33-34
  42. Gray (1976), 310-311
  43. Sims
  44. Simms
  45. "Digitised Manuscripts". www.bl.uk.
  46. 46.0 46.1 Sturkenboom, Ilse (2018). "The Paintings of the FreerDivanof Sultan Ahmad b. Shaykh Uvays and a New Taste for Decorative Design". Iran. 56 (2): 198. doi:10.1080/05786967.2018.1482727. ISSN 0578-6967. S2CID 194905114.
  47. 47.0 47.1 Swietochowski, Marie Lukens; Carboni, Stefano (1994). Illustrated Poetry and Epic Images: Persian Painting of the 1330s and 1340s. Metropolitan Museum of Art. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-87099-693-1.
  48. Biran, Michal; Kim, Hodong, eds. (2023). The Cambridge History of the Mongol Empire Vol 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 228. doi:10.1017/9781316337424. ISBN 978-1-316-33742-4.
  49. Wing 2016, p. 185 "Some of the most important changes in this distinctly Persian art form took place under the Jalayirids, bridging the masterpiece known as the Great Mongol Shāhnāma, produced in the late Ilkhanid period, with 15th and 16th century Timurid and Safavid painting, commonly considered the pinnacle of the Persian miniature form."
  50. Wing 2016, pp. 185-186.
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 Wing 2016, p. 186.
  52. Soucek, Priscilla (1974). "Comments on Persian Painting". Iranian Studies. 7 (1/2): 73.
  53. Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters (Paperback [edition] ed.). Leiden Boston: Brill. 2014. p. 13. ISBN 978-90-04-11961-1.
  54. Moravej, Elahe (2016). "COMPARING THE SCENE OF HUNTING DEER, BAHRAM GUR AND AZADEH IN SHAHNAMEHS OF 1331, 1333 AND 1352 A.D. COPIES".
  55. "Consultation BNF Persan 377". archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr.
  56. Gray (1976), 309-315, OAO; Rawson, 146-147
  57. Gray (1930), 37-55; Welch, 14-18; OAO
  58. Titley, 80; Walther & Wolf, 420-424
  59. Canby (1993), 79-80
  60. Blair 2014, pp. 240-241.
  61. Sims, Eleanor; Marshak, Boris Ilʹich; Grube, Ernst J. (1 January 2002). Peerless Images: Persian Painting and Its Sources. Yale University Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-300-09038-3.
  62. Sims, Eleanor; Marshak, Boris Ilʹich; Grube, Ernst J. (1 January 2002). Peerless Images: Persian Painting and Its Sources. Yale University Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-300-09038-3.
  63. Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters (Paperback [edition] ed.). Leiden Boston: Brill. 2014. pp. 12–13. ISBN 978-90-04-11961-1.
  64. 64.0 64.1 64.2 64.3 Soudavar 1992, p. 159.
  65. Titley, 103; Welch (mostly on Freer Jami after p. 24), 23-27, 31, 98-127; Freer Gallery Archived 2022-01-04 at the Wayback Machine
  66. OAO; Gray (1930), 74-89; Welch, throughout
  67. Sims, Eleanor (2002). Peerless images : Persian painting and its sources. New Haven : Yale University Press. p. 69. ISBN 978-0-300-09038-3. ...these "mountains of India" derive from Chinese landscape-models.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  68. Sheila S. Blair and Jonathan M. Bloom, The Art and Architecture of Islam 1250–1800, Yale University Press.
  69. Oleg Grabar, Mostly Miniatures: An Introduction to Persian Painting, Princeton University Press.
  70. Thomas T. Allsen, Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia, Cambridge University Press.
  71. Robert Hillenbrand, Islamic Art and Architecture, Thames & Hudson.
  72. Sheila S. Blair and Jonathan M. Bloom, Islamic Arts, Phaidon Press.
  73. 73.0 73.1 Neci̇poğlu, Gülru (2017). Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450. p. 537.
  74. Neci̇poğlu, Gülru (2017). Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450. p. 536.
  75. Necipoğlu, Gülru (17 February 2026). "The Jalayirid Contribution: A Topkapi Palace Album with Images in the Persianate, Chinese, and European Manners (Ca. 1350–1500)". Ars Orientalis. 55 (0). doi:10.3998/ars.9312. ISSN 2328-1286.
  76. 76.0 76.1 Neci̇poğlu, Gülru (2017). Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450. p. 539.
  77. Album prefaces and other documents on the history of calligraphers and painters (Paperback [edition] ed.). Leiden Boston: Brill. 2014. p. 1213. ISBN 978-90-04-11961-1.
  78. Neci̇poğlu, Gülru (2017). Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450. p. 542-544.
  79. Neci̇poğlu, Gülru (2017). Persianate Images between Europe and China: The “Frankish Manner” in the Diez and Topkapı Albums, c. 1350–1450. p. 549-550.
  80. Stuart Cary Welch, Persian Painting: Five Royal Safavid Manuscripts of the Sixteenth Century, Harvard University Press.
  81. Sheila Canby, Persian Painting, British Museum Press.
  82. Necipoğlu, Gülru (17 February 2026). "The Jalayirid Contribution: A Topkapi Palace Album with Images in the Persianate, Chinese, and European Manners (Ca. 1350–1500)". Ars Orientalis. 55 (0). doi:10.3998/ars.9312.
  83. The Diez Albums: Contexts and Contents. BRILL. 14 November 2016. pp. 164, 168. ISBN 978-90-04-32348-3.
  84. The Diez Albums: Contexts and Contents. BRILL. 14 November 2016. p. 164. ISBN 978-90-04-32348-3.
  85. Gray (1930), 57-66; OAO
  86. Welch, 17-27, and many individual pictures shown
  87. Gray (1930), 80-87
  88. B. W. Robinson, "Abu'l-Hasan Khan Gaffari Archived 2016-11-17 at the Wayback Machine," Encyclopædia Iranica, I/3, pp. 306-308
  89. 89.0 89.1 "Art of miniature". UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  90. Walsh, Judy (7 February 2018). "Matisse, Persian miniatures and Modernism". judy walsh artwork. Archived from the original on 2019-12-17. Retrieved 2019-12-17.

References[edit | edit source]

Further reading[edit | edit source]

Template:Culture of Iran

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Islamic art Template:Islamic calligraphy Template:Safavids Template:Intangible Heritage Iran