Created by Ajay Kumar
Last edited March 4, 2026
m Removing protection template from an unprotected page
m page updated
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Ancient Greek philosopher (428/423 – 348/347 BC)}}
{{Short description|Greek philosopher}}
{{other uses|Plato (disambiguation)|Platon (disambiguation)}}
{{Other uses}}
 
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
 
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=March 2020}}
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=March 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2025}}
{{Infobox philosopher
{{Infobox philosopher
| name            = Plato
| era              = [[Ancient Greek philosophy]]
| era              = [[Ancient Greek philosophy]]
| image            = Plato Silanion Musei Capitolini MC1377.jpg
| image            = Plato Silanion Musei Capitolini MC1377.png
| caption          = Roman copy of a portrait [[Bust (sculpture)|bust]] {{circa|370 BC}}
| caption          = Roman copy of a portrait [[Bust (sculpture)|bust]] {{circa|370 BC}}
| name            = Plato
| birth_date      = 428/427 or 424/423 BC
| birth_date      = 428/427 or 424/423 BC
| birth_place      = [[Classical Athens|Athens]], [[Ancient Greece|Greece]]
| birth_place      = [[Classical Athens|Athens]]
| death_date      = 348 BC (aged {{circa|80}})
| death_date      = 348/347 BC (aged 75-80)
| death_place      = Athens, Greece
| death_place      = Athens
| school_tradition = [[Platonic Academy]]
| school_tradition =  
| notable_students = [[Aristotle]]
| notable_students = [[Aristotle]]
| main_interests  =
| main_interests  =
[[Platonic epistemology|Epistemology]], [[Metaphysics]]<br/>
[[Platonic epistemology|Epistemology]], [[Metaphysics]]<br/>
[[Plato's political philosophy|Political philosophy]]
[[Plato's political philosophy|Political philosophy]], [[Ethics]]
| notable_works    =
| notable_works    =
{{Flatlist}}
{{Flatlist}}
Line 36: Line 36:
* ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]''
* ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]''
{{Endflatlist}}
{{Endflatlist}}
| notable_ideas   =
| notable_ideas   =
[[Allegory of the cave]] <br/>
{{Flatlist}}
[[Cardinal virtues]] <br/>
*[[Allegory of the cave]]
[[Form of the Good]] <br/>
*[[Cardinal virtues]]
[[Theory of forms]] <br/>
*[[Form of the Good]]
[[Plato's theory of soul|Divisions of the soul]] <br/>
*[[Theory of forms]]
[[Platonic love]] <br/>
*[[Plato's theory of soul|Divisions of the soul]]
[[Platonic solids]] <br/>
*[[Platonic love]]
*[[Platonic solids]]
{{Endflatlist}}
}}
}}
'''Plato''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|p|l|eɪ|t|oʊ}} {{respell|PLAY|toe}};{{sfn|Jones|2006}} {{lang-grc-gre|[[wikt:Πλάτων|Πλάτων]]}} {{transl|grc|Plátōn}}; 428/427 or 424/423 – 348 BC) was an [[Ancient Greek philosophy|ancient Greek philosopher]] born in [[Athens]] during the [[Classical Greece|Classical period]].
'''Plato''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|p|l|eɪ|t|oʊ}} {{respell|PLAY|toe}}; [[Greek language|Greek]]: {{lang|grc|Πλάτων}}, {{tlit|grc|Plátōn}}; born {{Circa|428–423}}&nbsp;BC, died 348/347&nbsp;BC) was an [[ancient Greek philosopher]] of [[Classical Athens]] who is most commonly considered the foundational thinker of the [[Western philosophy|Western philosophical tradition]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Socrates (469—399 B.C.E.) |url=https://iep.utm.edu/socrates/ |publisher=Internet encyclopedia of philosophy |access-date=27 August 2024}}</ref> An innovator of the [[Socratic dialogue|literary dialogue]] and [[dialectic]] forms, Plato influenced all the major areas of [[theoretical philosophy]] and [[practical philosophy]], and was the founder of the [[Platonic Academy|Academy]], a philosophical school in [[History of Athens|Athens]] where Plato taught the collection of [[philosophical theories]] that would later become known as [[Platonism]].
Plato's most famous contribution is his [[theory of forms|Theory of Forms (or Ideas)]], which aims to solve what is now known as the [[problem of universals]]. He was influenced by the [[pre-Socratic]] thinkers [[Pythagoras]], [[Heraclitus]], and [[Parmenides]], although much of what is known about them is derived from Plato himself.
 
Along with his teacher [[Socrates]], and his student [[Aristotle]], Plato is a central figure in the history of [[Western philosophy]]. Plato's complete works are believed to have survived for over 2,400 years{{Emdash}}unlike that of nearly all of his contemporaries.{{sfn|Cooper|1997|loc=introduction}} Although their popularity has fluctuated, they have consistently been read and studied through the ages.{{sfn|Cooper|1997|p=vii}} Through [[Platonism]]'s outgrowth [[Neoplatonism]], he also influenced [[Christian philosophy]], and both [[Jewish philosophy|Jewish]] and [[Islamic philosophy]]. In modern times, [[Alfred North Whitehead]] said: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of [[Note (typography)|footnotes]] to Plato."{{sfn|Whitehead|1978|p=39}}
 
== Life ==
{{anchor|Life}}
Plato was born between 428 and 423 BC{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=246}}{{sfn|Waterfield|2023}} into an [[Aristocracy|aristocratic]] and influential [[Ancient Athens|Athenian]] family;{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=53}} through his mother, [[Perictione]], he was a descendant of [[Solon]], a statesman credited with laying the foundations of [[Athenian democracy]].<ref>Stanton, G. R. ''Athenian Politics c. 800–500 BC: A Sourcebook'', Routledge, London (1990), p. 76.</ref> [[Diogenes Laertius]] asserts that Plato is a nickname that alludes to his robust figure,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Diogenes Laërtius |title=Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Book III |at=Book III, paragraph 4 |url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Lives_of_the_Eminent_Philosophers/Book_III |quote=he received the name of Plato on account of his robust figure, in place of his original name which was Aristocles, after his grandfather}}</ref> and that his birth name was ''Aristocles'' ({{lang|grc|Ἀριστοκλῆς}}), meaning 'best reputation', but this is widely regarded as false by modern scholarship.{{sfn|Notopoulos|1939|pp=135–145}}{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=243}}{{sfn|Guthrie|1986|loc=p. 12 (footnote)}}{{sfn|Waterfield|2023}} Plato had two brothers, [[Glaucon]] and [[Adeimantus of Collytus|Adeimantus]], both of whom appear in the ''[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'', and also a sister, Potone, and a half brother, [[Antiphon (brother of Plato)|Antiphon]].{{sfn|Waterfield|2023}}


In Athens, Plato founded the [[Platonic Academy|Academy]], a philosophical school where he taught the philosophical doctrines that would later become known as [[Platonism]]. Plato, or Platon, was a [[pen name]] derived, apparently, from the [[nickname]] given to him by his [[Greek wrestling|wrestling]] coach{{snd}}allegedly a reference to his physical broadness. According to [[Alexander Polyhistor]], quoted by [[Diogenes Laërtius]], his actual name was '''Aristocles''', son of Ariston, of the [[deme]] (suburb) [[Collytus]], in Athens.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.plato-dialogues.org/faq/faq005.htm|title=Plato FAQ: Plato's real name|website=www.plato-dialogues.org}}</ref>
During Plato's childhood, Athens was involved in the [[Peloponnesian War]] against Sparta. His older brothers, [[Adeimantus of Collytus|Adeimantus]] and [[Glaucon]], distinguished themselves at the battle of Megara in 409 BC.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=2}} Despite the war, Plato and his brothers, like all male citizens of Athens, received a traditional education in [[gymnastics]] and [[music]].{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|pp=14-19}} According to the ancient writers, there was a tradition that Plato's favorite employment in his youthful years was [[poetry]]: he wrote poems, [[dithyramb]]s at first, and afterwards [[lyric poem]]s and tragedies (a [[tetralogy]]), but abandoned his early passion and burnt his poems when he met Socrates and turned to philosophy.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|pp=20-21}} There are also some epigrams attributed to Plato, but these are now thought by some scholars to be spurious.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|pp=21-24}}


Plato was an innovator of the written [[dialogue]] and [[dialectic]] forms in philosophy. He raised problems for what became all the major areas of both [[theoretical philosophy]] and [[practical philosophy]]. His most famous contribution is the [[theory of forms|theory of forms (or ideas)]], which has been interpreted as advancing a solution to what is now known as the [[problem of universals]]. He is the namesake of [[Platonic love]] and the [[Platonic solids]]. His own most decisive philosophical influences are usually thought to have been, along with [[Socrates]], the pre-Socratics [[Pythagoras]], [[Heraclitus]], and [[Parmenides]], although few of his predecessors' works remain extant and much of what is known about these figures today derives from Plato himself.{{efn|"Though influenced primarily by Socrates, to the extent that Socrates is usually the main character in many of Plato's writings, he was also influenced by Heraclitus, Parmenides, and the Pythagoreans"<ref name="auto">[[#{{harvid|Brickhouse|Smith}}|Brickhouse & Smith]].</ref>}}
=== Socrates ===
[[File:Socrates Louvre.jpg|thumb|upright|Plato was one of the devoted young followers of Socrates, whose bust is pictured above.]]
In his youth, Plato first encountered [[Socrates]], who would become his teacher and greatest source of inspiration, initially in the company of other Athenian boys in the [[Palaestra]], such as is depicted with [[Lysis (dialogue)#Characters|Lysis]] and [[Menexenus]], who discuss philosophy with Socrates in the ''[[Lysis (dialogue)|Lysis]]'',{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=2}} but he soon would become a member of Socrates' inner circle, meeting with Socrates and his other followers. Socrates, along with the [[sophist]]s of his day, challenged the prevailing focus of [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|Early Greek philosophy]] on Natural philosophy, and investigated questions of ethics and politics, examining the ideas of his interlocutors with a series of questioning called the [[Socratic method]].{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|pp=40-42}}


Along with his teacher, Socrates, and student [[Aristotle]], Plato is a central figure in the [[history of philosophy]].{{efn|"...the subject of philosophy, as it is often conceived{{snd}}a rigorous and systematic examination of [[ethical]], political, [[metaphysics|metaphysical]], and [[epistemology|epistemological]] issues, armed with a distinctive method{{snd}}can be called his invention."<ref name="SEP">{{harvnb|Kraut|2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Plato and Aristotle: How Do They Differ?|encyclopedia=Britannica|url=https://www.britannica.com/story/plato-and-aristotle-how-do-they-differ}} "Plato (c. 428–c. 348 BCE) and Aristotle (384–322 BCE) are generally regarded as the two greatest figures of Western philosophy".</ref>}} Unlike the work of nearly all of his contemporaries, Plato's entire body of work is believed to have survived intact for over 2,400 years.<ref>Cooper, John M.; Hutchinson, D.S., eds. (1997): "Introduction."</ref> Although their popularity has fluctuated, Plato's works have consistently been read and studied.{{sfn|Cooper|1997|p=vii}} Through [[Neoplatonism]] Plato also greatly influenced both [[Christian philosophy|Christian]] (through e.g. [[Augustine of Hippo]]) and [[Islamic philosophy]] (through e.g. [[Al-Farabi]]). In modern times, [[Alfred North Whitehead]] famously said: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of [[Note (typography)|footnotes]] to Plato."{{sfn|Whitehead|1978|p=39}}
Socrates' immense influence on Plato is clearly borne out in Plato's dialogues: Plato never speaks in his own voice in [[Socratic dialogues|his dialogues]]; every dialogue except the ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]'' features Socrates, although many dialogues, including the ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' and ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', feature him speaking only rarely. [[Leo Strauss]] notes that Socrates' reputation for [[irony]] casts doubt on whether Plato's Socrates is expressing sincere beliefs.{{sfn|Strauss|1964|pp=50–51}} [[Xenophon]]'s ''[[Memorabilia (Xenophon)|Memorabilia]]'' and [[Aristophanes]]'s ''[[The Clouds]]'' seem to present a somewhat different portrait of Socrates from the one Plato paints. Aristotle attributes a different doctrine with respect to Forms to Plato and Socrates.<ref>''Metaphysics'' 987b1–11</ref> Aristotle suggests that Socrates' idea of forms can be discovered through investigation of the natural world, unlike Plato's Forms that exist beyond and outside the ordinary range of human understanding.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Religion of Socrates |last=McPherran |first=M.L. |publisher=Penn State Press |year=1998 |page=268}}</ref> The [[Socratic problem]] concerns how to reconcile these various accounts. The precise relationship between Plato and Socrates remains an area of contention among scholars.{{sfn|Vlastos|1991}}{{page needed|date=April 2023}}


== Biography ==
===Thirty tyrants and Trial of Socrates===
{{more|Life of Plato}}
{{see also|Thirty tyrants|Trial of Socrates}}
Little is known about Plato's early life and education. He belonged to an [[Aristocracy|aristocratic]] and influential family.<ref name="DW">Diogenes Laertius, ''Life of Plato'', III<br />• {{harvnb|Nails|2002|p=53}}<br />{{harvnb|Wilamowitz-Moellendorff|2005|p=46}}</ref> Based on ancient sources, modern scholars believe he was born in Athens or [[Aegina]], between 428{{sfn|Wilamowitz-Moellendorff|2005|p=46}} and 423 BC.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=246}} The exact time and place of birth are unknown. He was known to have worn [[Earring|earrings]] and [[finger rings]] during his youth to stand out and make himself look distinguished.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Notopoulos |first=James A. |date=1940 |title=Porphyry's Life of Plato |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/264394 |journal=Classical Philology |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=284–293 |doi=10.1086/362396 |jstor=264394 |s2cid=161160877 |issn=0009-837X}}</ref> The extent of Plato's affinity for [[Jewellery|jewelry]] while young, was even characterized as "decadent" by [[Sextus Empiricus]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Veres |first=Máté |date=2019-01-01 |title=Sextus Empiricus, Against Those in the Disciplines. Translated with an introduction and notes by Richard Bett (Oxford University Press, 2018) |url=https://www.academia.edu/39520412 |journal=International Journal for the Study of Skepticism}}</ref> Plato gives little biographical information, but refers at various points to some of his relatives with a great degree of precision, including his brothers, Adeimantus, and Glaucon, in the Plato's ''Republic''.{{sfn|Guthrie|1986|p=11}} These and other references make it possible to reconstruct Plato's [[family tree]].{{sfn|Kahn|1996|p=186}} Plato may have travelled in Italy, [[Sicily]], Egypt, and [[Cyrene, Libya|Cyrene]],{{sfn|McEvoy|1984}} but at 40, Plato founded a school of philosophy in Athens, the [[Platonic Academy|Academy]], on a plot of land in the Grove of Hecademus or Academus,{{sfn|Cairns|1961|p=xiii}} named after [[Academus]], an [[Attica|Attic]] hero in [[Greek mythology]]. The {{not a typo|Academy}} operated until it was destroyed by [[Sulla]] in 84 BC. Many philosophers studied at the {{not a typo|Academy}}, the most prominent being Aristotle.{{sfn|Dillon|2003|pp=1–3}}{{sfn|Press|2000|p=1}} According to [[Diogenes Laertius]], throughout his later life, Plato became entangled with the politics of the city of [[Syracuse, Sicily|Syracuse]], where he attempted to replace the tyrant [[Dionysius I of Syracuse|Dionysius]],{{sfn|Riginos|1976|p=73}} with Dionysius's brother-in-law, [[Dion of Syracuse]], whom Plato had recruited as one of his followers, but the tyrant himself turned against Plato. Plato almost faced death, but was sold into slavery. [[Anniceris]], a [[Cyrenaic]] philosopher, bought Plato's freedom for twenty [[Mina (unit)|minas]],<ref>Diogenes Laertius, [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0258%3Abook%3D3%3Achapter%3D1 Book iii, 20] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140428041249/http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0258%3Abook%3D3%3Achapter%3D1 |date=28 April 2014 }}</ref> and sent him home. After Dionysius's death, according to Plato's ''Seventh Letter'', Dion requested Plato return to Syracuse to tutor [[Dionysius II of Syracuse|Dionysius II]], who seemed to accept Plato's teachings, but eventually became suspicious of their motives, expelling Dion and holding Plato against his will. Eventually Plato left Syracuse and Dion would return to overthrow Dionysius and rule Syracuse, before being usurped by [[Callippus of Syracuse|Callippus]], a fellow disciple of Plato. A variety of sources have given accounts of Plato's death. One story, based on a mutilated manuscript,{{sfn|Riginos|1976|p=194}} suggests Plato died in his bed, whilst a young [[Thracian]] girl played the flute to him.{{sfn|Schall|1996}} Another tradition suggests Plato died at a wedding feast. The account is based on Diogenes Laertius's reference to an account by Hermippus, a third-century Alexandrian.{{sfn|Riginos|1976|p=195}} According to [[Tertullian]], Plato simply died in his sleep.{{sfn|Riginos|1976|p=195}}
According to the [[Seventh Letter]], whose authenticity has been disputed, as Plato came of age, he imagined for himself a life in public affairs.<ref>Plato (?), ''Seventh Letter'', 324c</ref> In 404, Sparta defeated Athens at the conclusion of the Peloponessian war, leading to the election of the [[Thirty Tyrants]], which included two of Plato's relatives, Critias and Charmides.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=2-3}} Plato himself was invited to join the administration, but declined, and quickly became disillusioned by the atrocities committed by the Thirty, especially when they tried to implicate Socrates in their seizure of the democratic general [[Leon of Salamis]] for [[summary execution]].{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|p=65-66}}


=== Name ===
In 403 BC, the democracy was restored after the regrouping of the democrats in exile, who entered the city through the [[Piraeus]] and met the forces of the Thirty at the [[Battle of Munychia]], where both Critias and Charmides were killed. In 401 BC the restored democrats raided [[Eleusis]] and killed the remaining oligarchic supporters, suspecting them of hiring mercenaries.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=4}}
[[File:Greek athletic sports and festivals (1910) (14767984254).jpg|thumb|Plato was a wrestler]]
The fact that the philosopher in his maturity called himself ''Platon'' is indisputable, but the origin of this name remains mysterious. ''Platon'' is a [[Ancient Greek personal names|nickname]] from the adjective ''platýs'' ({{LSJ|platu/s|πλατύς}}) 'broad'. Although ''Platon'' was a fairly common name (31 instances are known from Athens alone),{{sfn|Guthrie|1986|loc=p. 12 (footnote)}} the name does not occur in Plato's known family line.<ref name="Sedley 21-2">[[David Sedley|Sedley, David]], ''Plato's Cratylus'', Cambridge University Press 2003, [https://assets.cambridge.org/052158/4922/sample/0521584922ws.pdf pp. 21–22] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303193843/http://assets.cambridge.org/052158/4922/sample/0521584922ws.pdf |date=3 March 2016 }}.</ref> The sources of Diogenes Laertius account for this by claiming his [[Greek wrestling|wrestling]] coach, Ariston of Argos, dubbed him "broad" on account of his chest and shoulders, or that Plato derived his name from the breadth of his eloquence, or his wide forehead.<ref name="LaIV">Diogenes Laertius, ''Life of Plato'', IV</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Notopoulos|1939|p=135}}</ref> While recalling a [[Stoicism#Ethics and virtues|moral lesson]] about frugal living [[Seneca the Younger|Seneca]] mentions the meaning of Plato's name: "His very name was given him because of his broad chest."<ref>Seneca, ''Epistulae'', VI 58:29–30; translation by Robert Mott Gummere</ref> According to Diogenes Laertius,{{sfn|Laërtius|1925|loc=§&nbsp;4}} his birth name was ''Aristocles'' ({{lang|grc|Ἀριστοκλῆς}}), meaning 'best reputation'.{{efn|From ''[[Arete|aristos]]'' and ''[[kleos]]''}}


== Influences ==
As depicted in the many dialogues that are set between 401 and 399 BC, life largely returned to normal in Athens. However, [[Trial of Socrates|the prosecution of Socrates]] by Anytus put an end to Plato's plans for a political career.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|p=66}}
[[File:Socrates Louvre.jpg|thumb|upright|Plato was one of the devoted young followers of Socrates.]]
=== Socrates ===
{{main|Socratic problem}}
Plato never speaks in his own voice in [[Socratic dialogues|his dialogues]]; every dialogue except the ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]'' features Socrates, although many dialogues, including the ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' and ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', feature him speaking only rarely. [[Leo Strauss]] notes that Socrates' reputation for [[irony]] casts doubt on whether Plato's Socrates is expressing sincere beliefs.{{sfn|Strauss|1964|pp=50–51}} [[Xenophon]]'s ''[[Memorabilia (Xenophon)|Memorabilia]]'' and [[Aristophanes]]'s ''[[The Clouds]]'' seem to present a somewhat different portrait of Socrates from the one Plato paints. Aristotle attributes a different doctrine with respect to Forms to Plato and Socrates.<ref>''Metaphysics'' 987b1–11</ref> Aristotle suggests that Socrates' idea of forms can be discovered through investigation of the natural world, unlike Plato's Forms that exist beyond and outside the ordinary range of human understanding.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Religion of Socrates |last=McPherran |first=M.L. |publisher=Penn State Press |year=1998 |page=268}}</ref> The Socratic problem concerns how to reconcile these various accounts. The precise relationship between Plato and Socrates remains an area of contention among scholars.{{sfn|Vlastos|1991}}{{pn|date=April 2023}}


=== Pythagoreanism ===
===Later philosophical development===
{{main|Pythagoreanism}}
After the death of Socrates, Plato remained in Athens for roughly three years.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|p=71}}
[[File:Kapitolinischer Pythagoras adjusted.jpg|right|upright|thumb|The mathematical and mystical teachings of the followers of Pythagoras exerted a strong influence on Plato.]]
Although Socrates influenced Plato directly, the influence of [[Pythagoras]], or in a broader sense, the Pythagoreans, such as [[Archytas]] also appears to have been significant. Aristotle and [[Cicero]] both claimed that the philosophy of Plato closely followed the teachings of the Pythagoreans.<ref>Metaphysics, 1.6.1 (987a)</ref><ref>Tusc. Disput. 1.17.39.</ref> According to [[R. M. Hare]], this influence consists of three points:
# The platonic Republic might be related to the idea of "a tightly organized community of like-minded thinkers", like the one established by Pythagoras in Croton.
# The idea that mathematics and, generally speaking, abstract thinking is a secure basis for philosophical thinking as well as "for substantial theses in [[science]] and [[morals]]".
# They shared a "mystical approach to the soul and its place in the material world".<ref>R.M. Hare, Plato in C.C.W. Taylor, R.M. Hare and Jonathan Barnes, Greek Philosophers, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 (1982), 103–189, here 117–119.</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite book |title=History of Western Philosophy |last=Russell |first=Bertrand |publisher=Routledge |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-415-07854-2 |pages=120–124}}</ref>


Pythagoras held that all things are number, and the cosmos comes from numerical principles. He introduced the concept of form as distinct from matter, and that the physical world is an imitation of an eternal mathematical world. These ideas were very influential on Heraclitus, Parmenides and Plato.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Calian |first=Florin George |url=https://brill.com/display/book/9789004467224/BP000010.xml |title=Numbers, Ontologically Speaking: Plato on Numerosity |year=2021 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-46722-4 |language=en}}</ref><ref name=McFarlane>{{cite web |last1=McFarlane |first1=Thomas J. |title=Plato's Parmenides |url=http://www.integralscience.org/platoparmenides.html |website=Integralscience |access-date=12 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222045722/http://www.integralscience.org/platoparmenides.html|archive-date=22 February 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
==== Heraclitus and Parmenides ====
<!----{{multiple image
| align = right|total_width=420
| image1 = Kepler Hexahedron Earth.jpg |width1=290|height1=304
| image2 = Kepler Icosahedron Water.jpg |width2=306|height2=328
| image3 = Kepler Octahedron Air.jpg |width3=328|height3=334
| image4 = Kepler Tetrahedron Fire.jpg |width4=367|height4=328
| image5 = Kepler Dodecahedron Universe.jpg |width5=330|height5=332
| footer = Assignment to the elements in [[Johannes Kepler|Kepler]]'s ''[[Mysterium Cosmographicum]]''
}}
In the dialogue ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' Plato associated each of the four [[classical element]]s ([[Earth (classical element)|earth]], [[Air (classical element)|air]], [[Water (classical element)|water]], and [[Fire (classical element)|fire]]) with a regular solid ([[cube]], [[octahedron]], [[icosahedron]], and [[tetrahedron]] respectively) due to their shape, the so-called Platonic solids. The fifth regular solid, the [[dodecahedron]], was supposed to be the element which made up the heavens.--->
=== Heraclitus and Parmenides ===
{{main|Heraclitus|Parmenides}}
{{main|Heraclitus|Parmenides}}
{{multiple image
{{multiple image
| align     = right
| align = right
| direction = horizontal
| direction = horizontal
| header   =
| header =
| width     =
| width =
<!-- Image 1 -->
<!-- Image 1 -->
| image1   = Hendrik ter Brugghen - Heraclitus.jpg
| image1 = Hendrik ter Brugghen - Heraclitus.jpg
| width1   = 150
| width1 = 150
| alt1     =
| alt1 =
| caption1 = ''Heraclitus'' (1628) by [[Hendrick ter Brugghen]]. Heraclitus saw a world in [[flux]], with everything always in conflict, constantly changing.
| caption1 = ''Heraclitus'' (1628) by [[Hendrick ter Brugghen]]. Heraclitus saw a world in [[flux]], with everything always in conflict, constantly changing.
<!-- Image 2 -->
<!-- Image 2 -->
| image2   = Parmenides.jpg
| image2 = Busto di Parmenide (cropped).jpg
| width2   = 150
| width2 = 150
| alt2     =
| alt2 =
| caption2 = Bust of Parmenides from [[Velia]]. Parmenides saw the world as [[Eternity of the world|eternal]] and unchanging, that all change was an illusion.
| caption2 = Bust of Parmenides from [[Velia]]. Parmenides saw the world as [[Eternity of the world|eternal]] and unchanging, that all change was an illusion.
}}
}}
The two philosophers Heraclitus and Parmenides, influenced by earlier [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic Greek philosophers]] such as Pythagoras and [[Xenophanes]],<ref name="Palmer">{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/parmenides |title=Parmenides |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |author=John Palmer |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |year=2019|access-date=18 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020023553/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/parmenides/|archive-date=20 October 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> departed from mythological explanations for the universe and began the [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] tradition that strongly influenced Plato and continues today.<ref name="McFarlane" /> Heraclitus viewed all things as [[Impermanence|continuously changing]], that one cannot "step into the same river twice" due to the ever-changing waters flowing through it, and all things exist as a contraposition of opposites. According to Diogenes Laertius, Plato received these ideas through Heraclitus' disciple [[Cratylus]].<ref name="Large">{{cite web |last1=Large |first1=William |title=Heraclitus |url=http://www.arasite.org/WLnew/Greeks/heraclitus.html |website=Arasite |access-date=3 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170306132037/http://www.arasite.org/WLnew/Greeks/heraclitus.html|archive-date=6 March 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Parmenides adopted an altogether contrary vision, arguing for the idea of a changeless, eternal universe and the view that change is an illusion.<ref name="McFarlane" /> Plato's most self-critical dialogue is the ''Parmenides'', which features Parmenides and his student [[Zeno of Elea|Zeno]], which criticizes Plato's own metaphysical theories. Plato's ''[[Sophist (dialogue)|Sophist]]'' dialogue includes an [[Eleatics|Eleatic]] stranger. These ideas about change and permanence, or becoming and Being, influenced Plato in formulating his theory of Forms.<ref name="Large" />
In Athens, Plato studied with [[Cratylus]], a philosopher who followed the early Greek philosopher [[Heraclitus]], and also [[Hermogenes (philosopher)|Hermogenes]], an [[Eleatic]] philosopher in the tradition of [[Parmenides]].{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} Heraclitus viewed all things as [[Impermanence|continuously changing]], that one cannot "step into the same river twice" due to the ever-changing waters flowing through it, and all things exist as a contraposition of opposites, while Parmenides adopted an altogether contrary vision, arguing for the idea of a changeless, eternal universe and the view that change is an illusion. Heraclitus's views are expounded by Cratylus himself in Plato's dialogue ''[[Cratylus]]'' and deconstructed in the ''[[Theaetetus (dialogue)|Theaetetus]]'' by Socrates. Plato would go on to depict both Parmenides and Parmenides' student [[Zeno of Elea|Zeno]] in the ''Parmenides'', and an "Eleatic Stranger" also appears in the ''[[Sophist (dialogue)|Sophist]]'' and ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]''.
 
In roughly 396 BC, Plato left Athens and studied in [[Megara]] with [[Euclid of Megara]], founder of the Megarian school of philosophy, and other Socratics.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|p=72}}
 
==== Mathematics ====
Around 394 BC or earlier, he returned to Athens, where, as an Athenian male of military age he would have needed to be available to serve in the [[Corinthian war]], which Athens participated in from 395 to 386 BC.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|p=73}} Other than potential military service, Plato spent his time studying mathematics with [[Archytas of Tarentum]], [[Theaetetus (mathematician)|Theaetetus]], [[Leodamas of Thasos]], and [[Neocleides]] in the grove of [[Hecademus]],{{sfn|Nails|2006|pp=5-6}} named after an [[Attica|Attic]] hero in [[Greek mythology]], northwest of the city of [[Athens]], where he would later found his Academy.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023}} During this time, Plato likely began work on some of his earliest works; including the ''[[Apology (Plato)|Apology]]'', possibly early drafts of the ''[[Gorgias (dialogue)|Gorgias]]'' and ''[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'' Book I, and an early form of the ''Republic'' books II-IV, in the form of a speech rather than a dialogue, which was ridiculed by Aristophanes in the ''[[Ecclesiazusae]]'' in 391 BC.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=6}} [[Speusippus]], the son of Plato's sister Potone, who took over the academy after Plato's death, joined the group in about 390 BC, and [[Eudoxus of Cnidus]], another early mathematician, arrived around 385 BC.{{sfn|Nails|2006|pp=5-6}}
 
==== Pythagoreanism ====
{{main|Pythagoreanism}}
[[File:Kapitolinischer Pythagoras adjusted.jpg|right|upright|thumb|The mathematical and mystical teachings of the followers of Pythagoras, pictured above, exerted a strong influence on Plato.]]
After the conclusion of the [[Corinthian War]], Plato travelled to southern Italy to study with [[Archytas]] and other Pythagoreans.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|p=112}} The influence of these Pythagoreans appears to have been significant. According to [[R. M. Hare]], this influence consists of three points:
# The platonic Republic might be related to the idea of "a tightly organized community of like-minded thinkers", like the one established by Pythagoras in Croton.
# The idea that mathematics and, generally speaking, abstract thinking is a secure basis for philosophical thinking as well as "for substantial theses in [[science]] and [[morals]]".
# They shared a "mystical approach to the soul and its place in the material world".<ref>R.M. Hare, Plato in C.C.W. Taylor, R.M. Hare and Jonathan Barnes, Greek Philosophers, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 (1982), 103–189, here 117–119.</ref>
 
Pythagoras held that all things are number, and the cosmos comes from numerical principles. He introduced the concept of form as distinct from matter, and that the physical world is an imitation of an eternal mathematical world.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Calian |first=Florin George |url=https://brill.com/display/book/9789004467224/BP000010.xml |title=Numbers, Ontologically Speaking: Plato on Numerosity |year=2021 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-46722-4 |language=en |access-date=10 April 2023 |archive-date=7 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230507230433/https://brill.com/display/book/9789004467224/BP000010.xml |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
=== Later years: Syracuse and the Academy ===
====First trip to Syracuse====
When Plato was about 40 years old, he visited Syracuse. Many ancient sources, including the collection of ''[[Epistles (Plato)|Letters]]'' attributed to Plato, tell how he became entangled with the politics of the city of [[Syracuse, Sicily|Syracuse]]. Plato initially visited Syracuse while it was under the rule of [[Dionysius I of Syracuse|Dionysius]], in roughly 385 BC.{{sfn|Riginos|1976|p=73}} During this first trip Dionysius's brother-in-law, [[Dion of Syracuse]], became one of Plato's disciples, but the tyrant himself turned against Plato.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023}}
 
====Foundation of the Academy====
[[File:MANNapoli_124545_plato's_academy_mosaic.jpg|thumb|[[Plato's Academy mosaic]] in the villa of T. Siminius Stephanus in [[Pompeii]], around 100 BC to 100 CE]]
{{main|Platonic Academy}}
After his return from Syracuse, Plato founded his philosophical school, the Academy, near the sacred olive grove of [[Hecademus]], in roughly 383 BC.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} At first, the property consisted of only a house with a garden, and during his lifetime, the work of the Academy itself likely took part in an open area for study of philosophy and mathematics.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} From 383 BC until about 366 BC, Plato primarily spent his time at the Academy, writing the majority of the dialogues during this time.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=7}} Much like Socrates and his students had been parodied in [[Aristophanes]]' plays [[The Clouds]] and [[The Birds (play)|The Birds]], the students at the Academy seem to have been the target of their contemporaries in [[Middle Comedy]].{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} A fragment from a lost play of [[Epicrates of Ambracia|Epicrates]] depicts two students of the Academy engaged in a fierce debate over the [[genus]] of a [[pumpkin]], in a parody of the Platonic conception of [[diairesis]].{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} [[Aristotle of Stagira]], who would go on to become a philosopher as famous as Plato in his own right,{{sfn|Dillon|2003|pp=1–3}} arrived in 367 BC, shortly before Plato departed again for Syracuse.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=7}}
 
====Second and third trips to Syracuse====
After Dionysius I's death in 367 BC, Plato returned to Syracuse, likely early in 366 BC, at the request of Dion, in order to tutor [[Dionysius II of Syracuse|Dionysius II]] and guide him to become a [[philosopher king]]. Dionysius II seemed to accept Plato's teachings, but he became suspicious of Dion, his uncle. Dionysius expelled Dion, and Plato, after trying repeatedly to reconcile the two, gave up and returned to Athens.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}}
 
Plato returned to Syracuse a third time in 361 BC, likely staying over the winter until 360 BC.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} Dionysius kept Plato against his will, forcing Plato to appeal to his friend [[Archytas]] to intercede, at which point he returned to Athens.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} Dion would return to overthrow Dionysius and ruled Syracuse for a short time from 357 BC up until 354 BC,{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=248}} when he was usurped by [[Calippus of Syracuse|Calippus]], an Athenian who Plato insists, in the Seventh Letter, had no connection with the Academy.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=10}}
 
==== Final years and death ====
After 360 BC, Plato returned to Athens, where he spent the remainder of his life.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023}}
 
At this point, he wrote or revised some of his final works, possibly including the ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'', ''[[Critias]]'', ''[[Sophist (dialogue)|Sophist]]'', ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', ''[[Philebus]]'', and his longest work, the ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]'', all of which exhibit similarity of language, philosophical themes, and style that indicate they were intentionally published together to present a unified viewpoint.{{sfn|Waterfield|2023|p=87}} At the time of his death, however, the ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]'' was still unfinished; this work was edited by a student at the Academy, [[Philip of Opus]], who is also generally believed to have written the ''[[Epinomis]]'', an appendix to the ''Laws''.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=11}}
 
In 348/347 BC, Plato died and was buried in his garden in the [[Platonic Academy|Academy]] in Athens.{{sfn| Nails| 2002| p=249}} At the time of his death, Plato seems to have been self-sufficient, but not wealthy.{{sfn| Nails| 2002| pp=249-250}} A will preserved by one of the ancient biographers of Plato, which discusses his estate, does not mention the Academy, which suggests that he left a separate provision for it or possibly established an endowment.{{sfn|Nails|2002|p=249-250}} He was succeeded as the head of the Academy by [[Speusippus]], his nephew.{{sfn|Nails|2006|p=11}}


== Philosophy ==
== Philosophy ==
Line 113: Line 139:
=== The Forms ===
=== The Forms ===
{{See also|Theory of forms|l1=Plato's theory of Forms}}
{{See also|Theory of forms|l1=Plato's theory of Forms}}
In the dialogues Socrates regularly asks for the meaning of a general term (e. g. justice, truth, beauty), and criticizes those who instead give him particular examples, rather than the quality shared by all examples. "Platonism" and its theory of Forms (also known as 'theory of Ideas;) denies the reality of the material world, considering it only an image or copy of the real world. According to this theory of Forms, there are these two kinds of things: the apparent world of material objects grasped by the senses, which constantly changes, and an unchanging and unseen world of Forms, grasped by reason ({{lang|grc|λογική}}). Plato's Forms represent [[Type (metaphysics)|types]] of things, as well as [[property (metaphysics)|properties]], patterns, and [[Relations (philosophy)|relations]], which are referred to as objects. Just as individual tables, chairs, and cars refer to objects in this world, 'tableness', 'chairness', and 'carness', as well as e. g. [[justice]], [[truth]], and [[beauty]] refer to objects in another world. One of Plato's most cited examples for the Forms were the truths of [[geometry]], such as the [[Pythagorean theorem]]. The theory of Forms is first introduced in the ''[[Phaedo]]'' dialogue (also known as ''On the Soul''), wherein Socrates disputes the [[Pluralism (philosophy)|pluralism]] of [[Anaxagoras]], then the most popular response to Heraclitus and Parmenides.
In the dialogues Socrates regularly asks for the meaning of a general term (e. g. justice, truth, beauty), and criticizes those who instead give him particular examples, rather than the quality shared by all examples. "Platonism" and its theory of Forms (also known as 'theory of Ideas') denies the reality of the material world, considering it only an image or copy of the real world. According to this theory of Forms, there are these two kinds of things: the apparent world of material objects grasped by the senses, which constantly changes,<ref>Kidder, D. S. and Oppenheim, N. D. (2006), The Intellectual Devotional, p. 27, Borders Group, Inc, Ann Arbor, {{ISBN|978-1-60961-205-4}}.</ref> and an unchanging and unseen world of Forms, grasped by reason. Plato's Forms represent [[Type (metaphysics)|types]] of things, as well as [[property (metaphysics)|properties]], patterns, and [[Relations (philosophy)|relations]], which are referred to as objects. Just as individual tables, chairs, and cars refer to objects in this world, 'tableness', 'chairness', and 'carness', as well as e.g. [[justice]], [[truth]], and [[beauty]] refer to objects in another world. One of Plato's most cited examples for the Forms were the truths of [[geometry]], such as the [[Pythagorean theorem]]. The theory of Forms is first introduced in the ''[[Phaedo]]'' dialogue (also known as ''On the Soul''), wherein Socrates disputes the [[Pluralism (philosophy)|pluralism]] of [[Anaxagoras]], then the most popular response to Heraclitus and Parmenides.


=== The soul ===
=== The Soul ===
{{See also|Plato's theory of soul}}
{{See also|Plato's theory of soul}}
For Plato, as was characteristic of ancient Greek philosophy, the soul was that which gave life.<ref>See this brief exchange from the ''Phaedo'': "What is it that, when present in a body, makes it living? – A soul." ''Phaedo'' 105c.</ref> Plato advocates a belief in the immortality of the soul, and several dialogues end with long speeches imagining the [[afterlife]]. In the ''Timaeus'', Socrates locates the parts of the soul within the human body: Reason is located in the head, spirit in the top third of the [[torso]], and the appetite in the middle third of the torso, down to the [[navel]].<ref>Plato, ''Timaeus'' [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0180%3Atext%3DTim.%3Asection%3D44d 44d] & [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0180%3Atext%3DTim.%3Apage%3D70 70]</ref>{{sfn|Dorter|2006|p=360}} When Plato describes the soul's interactions with the body, he writes that the soul takes up space in the body and comes into contact with various bodily forces, such as bile and phlegm.<ref>Campbell, Douglas R. "Located in Space: Plato's Theory of Psychic Motion," ''Ancient Philosophy'' 42 2: (2022) 419–442. Campbell lays out Plato's view of the soul as something that exists in space and that comes into contact with parts of the body.</ref>
For Plato, as was characteristic of ancient Greek philosophy, the soul was that which gave life. Plato advocates a belief in the immortality of the soul, and several dialogues end with long speeches imagining the [[afterlife]]. In ''the Republic'' (IV), the soul consists of three parts, which are located in different regions of the body.<ref>{{Cite web |title=‪Plato’s Psychology of Action and the Origin of Agency‬ |url=https://scholar.google.de/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=de&user=eywnpDEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=eywnpDEAAAAJ:d1gkVwhDpl0C |access-date= |website=scholar.google.de}}</ref> Also in the ''Timaeus'', Socrates locates the parts of the soul within the human body: Reason is located in the head, spirit in the top third of the [[torso]], and the appetite in the middle third of the torso, down to the [[navel]].{{sfn|Dorter|2006|p=360}}


Furthermore, Plato evinces a belief in the theory of [[reincarnation]] in multiple dialogues (such as the ''Phaedo'' and ''Timaeus''). Scholars debate whether he intends the theory to be literally true, however.<ref>Jorgensen 2018 is perhaps the strongest opponent to interpretations on which Plato intends the theory literally. See Jorgensen, ''The Embodied Soul in Plato's Later Thought''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Campbell 2022, on the other hand, represents a recent defense of the literal reading. See Campbell, "Plato's Theory of Reincarnation: Eschatology and Natural Philosophy", ''Review of Metaphysics'' 75 (4): 643–665. 2022.</ref> He uses this idea of reincarnation to introduce the concept that knowledge is a matter of [[Anamnesis (philosophy)|recollection]] of things acquainted with before one is born, and not of observation or study.{{sfn|Baird & Kaufmann|2008}} Keeping with the theme of admitting his own ignorance, Socrates regularly complains of his forgetfulness. In the ''Meno'', Socrates uses a geometrical example to expound Plato's view that knowledge in this latter sense is acquired by recollection. Socrates elicits a fact concerning a geometrical construction from a slave boy, who could not have otherwise known the fact (due to the slave boy's lack of education). The knowledge must be of, Socrates concludes, an eternal, non-perceptible Form.
Furthermore, Plato evinces a belief in the theory of [[reincarnation]] in multiple dialogues (such as the ''Phaedo'' and ''Timaeus''). Scholars debate whether he intends the theory to be literally true, however.{{sfn|Jorgenson|2018}} He uses this idea of reincarnation to introduce the concept that knowledge is a matter of [[Anamnesis (philosophy)|recollection]] of things acquainted with before one is born, and not of observation or study.{{sfn|Baird & Kaufmann|2008}} Keeping with the theme of admitting his own ignorance, Socrates regularly complains of his forgetfulness. In the ''Meno'', Socrates uses a geometrical example to expound Plato's view that knowledge in this latter sense is acquired by recollection. Socrates elicits a fact concerning a geometrical construction from a slave boy, who could not have otherwise known the fact (due to the slave boy's lack of education). The knowledge must be of, Socrates concludes, an eternal, non-perceptible Form.


=== Epistemology ===
=== Epistemology ===
{{main|Platonic epistemology}}
{{main|Platonic epistemology}}
[[File:Classical definition of Kno.svg|thumb|A Venn diagram illustrating the classical theory of knowledge]]
 
Plato also discusses several aspects of [[epistemology]]. In several dialogues, Socrates inverts the common man's intuition about what is knowable and what is real. Reality is unavailable to those who use their senses. Socrates says that he who sees with his eyes is blind. While most people take the objects of their senses to be real if anything is, Socrates is contemptuous of people who think that something has to be graspable in the hands to be real. In the ''Theaetetus'', he says such people are ''eu amousoi'' (εὖ ἄμουσοι), an expression that means literally, "happily without the muses".<ref>''Theaetetus'' 156a</ref> In other words, such people are willingly ignorant, living without divine inspiration and access to higher insights about reality. Many have interpreted Plato as stating{{snd}}even having been the first to write{{snd}}that [[knowledge]] is [[justified true belief]], an influential view that informed future developments in epistemology.{{sfn|Fine|2003|p=5}} Plato also identified problems with the ''justified true belief'' definition in the ''Theaetetus'', concluding that justification (or an "account") would require knowledge of ''difference'', meaning that the [[definition of knowledge]] is [[circular reasoning|circular]].<ref>''Theaetetus'' [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0172%3Atext%3DTheaet.%3Asection%3D210a 210a–b]</ref>{{sfn|McDowell|1973|p=256}}
Plato also discusses several aspects of [[epistemology]]. In several dialogues, Socrates inverts the common man's intuition about what is knowable and what is real. Reality is unavailable to those who use their senses. Socrates says that he who sees with his eyes is blind. While most people take the objects of their senses to be real if anything is, Socrates is contemptuous of people who think that something has to be graspable in the hands to be real. In other words, such people are willingly ignorant, living without divine inspiration and access to higher insights about reality. Although Plato has occasionally been presented as having been the first to write that [[knowledge]] is [[justified true belief]] in the ''Theaetetus'',{{sfn|Fine|2003|p=5}} Plato also identified problems with this same ''justified true belief'' definition in that same work, concluding that justification (or an "account") would require knowledge of ''difference'', meaning that the [[definition of knowledge]] is [[circular reasoning|circular]].{{sfn|McDowell|1973|p=256}}


In the ''Sophist'', ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', ''Republic'', ''Timaeus'', and the ''Parmenides'', Plato associates knowledge with the apprehension of unchanging Forms and their relationships to one another (which he calls "expertise" in dialectic), including through the processes of ''collection'' and ''division''.{{sfn|Taylor|2011|pp=176–187}} More explicitly, Plato himself argues in the ''Timaeus'' that knowledge is always proportionate to the realm from which it is gained. In other words, if one derives one's account of something experientially, because the world of sense is in flux, the views therein attained will be mere opinions. Meanwhile, opinions are characterized by a lack of necessity and stability. On the other hand, if one derives one's account of something by way of the non-sensible Forms, because these Forms are unchanging, so too is the account derived from them. That apprehension of Forms is required for knowledge may be taken to cohere with Plato's theory in the ''Theaetetus'' and ''Meno''.{{sfn|Lee|2011|p=432}} Indeed, the apprehension of Forms may be at the base of the account required for justification, in that it offers [[Foundationalism|foundational]] knowledge which itself needs no account, thereby avoiding an [[infinite regression]].{{sfn|Taylor|2011|p=189}}
In the ''Sophist'', ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', ''Republic'', ''Timaeus'', and the ''Parmenides'', Plato associates knowledge with the apprehension of unchanging Forms and their relationships to one another (which he calls "expertise" in dialectic), including through the processes of ''collection'' and ''division''.{{sfn|Taylor|2011|pp=176–187}} More explicitly, Plato himself argues in the ''Timaeus'' that knowledge is always proportionate to the realm from which it is gained. In other words, if one derives one's account of something experientially, because the world of sense is in flux, the views therein attained will be mere opinions. Meanwhile, opinions are characterized by a lack of necessity and stability. On the other hand, if one derives one's account of something by way of the non-sensible Forms, because these Forms are unchanging, so too is the account derived from them. That apprehension of Forms is required for knowledge may be taken to cohere with Plato's theory in the ''Theaetetus'' and ''Meno''.{{sfn|Lee|2011|p=432}} Indeed, the apprehension of Forms may be at the base of the account required for justification, in that it offers [[Foundationalism|foundational]] knowledge which itself needs no account, thereby avoiding an [[infinite regression]].{{sfn|Taylor|2011|p=189}}


[[File:Temida, Gdansk Court.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9|''What is justice?'']]
[[File:Temida, Gdansk Court.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9|"What is justice?" forms one of the core quandaries of the ''Republic''.]]
 
=== Ethics ===
=== Ethics ===
{{seealso|Form of the Good}}
{{see also|Form of the Good}}
Several dialogues discuss [[ethics]] including virtue and vice, pleasure and pain, crime and punishment, and justice and medicine. Socrates presents the famous [[Euthyphro dilemma]] in the [[Euthyphro|dialogue]] of the same name: "Is the [[piety|pious]] ([[:wikt:ὅσιος|τὸ ὅσιον]]) loved by the [[deity|gods]] because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" ([[Stephanus pagination|10a]]) In the ''Protagoras'' dialogue it is argued through Socrates that virtue is innate and cannot be learned, that no one does bad on purpose, and to know what is good results in doing what is good; that knowledge is virtue. In the ''Republic'', Plato poses the question, "What is justice?" and by examining both individual justice and the justice that informs societies, Plato is able not only to inform metaphysics, but also ethics and politics with the question: "What is the basis of moral and social obligation?" Plato's well-known answer rests upon the fundamental responsibility to seek wisdom, wisdom which leads to an understanding of the Form of the Good. Plato views "The Good" as the supreme Form, somehow existing even "beyond being". In this manner, justice is obtained when knowledge of how to fulfill one's moral and political function in society is put into practice.<ref>[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]], Book IV.</ref>
Several dialogues discuss [[ethics]] including virtue and vice, pleasure and pain, crime and punishment, and justice and medicine. Socrates presents the famous [[Euthyphro dilemma]] in the [[Euthyphro|dialogue]] of the same name: "Is the [[piety|pious]] ([[:wikt:ὅσιος|τὸ ὅσιον]]) loved by the [[deity|gods]] because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" ([[Stephanus pagination|10a]]) In the ''Protagoras'' dialogue it is argued through Socrates that virtue is innate and cannot be learned, that no one does bad on purpose, and to know what is good results in doing what is good; that knowledge is virtue. In the ''Republic'', Plato poses the question, "What is justice?" and by examining both individual justice and the justice that informs societies, Plato is able not only to inform metaphysics, but also ethics and politics with the question: "What is the basis of moral and social obligation?" Plato's well-known answer rests upon the fundamental responsibility to seek wisdom, wisdom which leads to an understanding of the Form of the Good. Plato views "The Good" as the supreme Form, somehow existing even "beyond being". In this manner, justice is obtained when knowledge of how to fulfill one's moral and political function in society is put into practice.


=== Politics ===
=== Politics ===
{{main|Plato's political philosophy}}
{{main|Plato's political philosophy}}
[[File:POxy3679 Parts Plato Republic.jpg|thumb|[[Oxyrhynchus Papyri]], with fragment of Plato's ''Republic'']]
 
[[File:POxy3679 Parts Plato Republic.jpg|thumb|Papyrus from [[Oxyrhynchus Papyri|Oxyrhynchus]], with fragment of Plato's ''Republic'']]
The dialogues also discuss politics. Some of Plato's most famous doctrines are contained in the ''Republic'' as well as in the ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]'' and the ''Statesman''. Because these opinions are not spoken directly by Plato and vary between dialogues, they cannot be straightforwardly assumed as representing Plato's own views.
The dialogues also discuss politics. Some of Plato's most famous doctrines are contained in the ''Republic'' as well as in the ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]]'' and the ''Statesman''. Because these opinions are not spoken directly by Plato and vary between dialogues, they cannot be straightforwardly assumed as representing Plato's own views.


Line 146: Line 174:


=== Rhetoric and poetry ===
=== Rhetoric and poetry ===
Several dialogues tackle questions about art, including rhetoric and rhapsody. Socrates says that poetry is inspired by the [[muses]], and is not rational. He speaks approvingly of this, and other forms of [[divine madness]] (drunkenness, eroticism, and dreaming) in the ''Phaedrus'',<ref>''Phaedrus ''(265a–c)</ref> and yet in the ''Republic'' wants to outlaw Homer's great poetry, and laughter as well. Scholars often view Plato's philosophy as at odds with rhetoric due to his criticisms of rhetoric in the ''[[Gorgias (dialogue)|Gorgias]]'' and his ambivalence toward rhetoric expressed in the ''[[Phaedrus (dialogue)|Phaedrus]]''. But other contemporary researchers contest the idea that Plato despised rhetoric and instead view his dialogues as a dramatization of complex rhetorical principles.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Kastely|first=James|url=https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/R/bo20698062.html|title=The Rhetoric of Plato's Republic|publisher=Chicago UP|year=2015|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bjork|first=Collin|date=2021|title=Plato, Xenophon, and the Uneven Temporalities of Ethos in the Trial of Socrates|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/philrhet.54.3.0240|journal=Philosophy & Rhetoric|volume=54|issue=3|pages=240–262|doi=10.5325/philrhet.54.3.0240|jstor=10.5325/philrhet.54.3.0240|s2cid=244334227|issn=0031-8213}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Bengtson|first=Erik|title=The epistemology of rhetoric: Plato, doxa and post-truth|publisher=Uppsala|year=2019}}</ref> Plato made abundant use of mythological narratives in his own work;<ref>{{cite web|last1=Chappel |first1=Timothy |title=Mythos and Logos in Plato |url=https://www.academia.edu/10450689 |publisher=Open University |access-date=20 August 2017}}</ref> It is generally agreed that the main purpose for Plato in using myths was didactic.<ref>Jorgensen, Chad. ''The Embodied Soul in Plato's Later Thought''. Cambridge: Cambridge  University Press, 2018 page 199.</ref> He considered that only a few people were capable or interested in following a reasoned philosophical discourse, but men in general are attracted by stories and tales. Consequently, then, he used the myth to convey the conclusions of the philosophical reasoning.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Partenie |first1=Catalin |title=Plato's Myths |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-myths/ |website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=29 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170527053738/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-myths/|archive-date=27 May 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Notable examples include the story of [[Atlantis]], the [[Myth of Er]], and the [[Allegory of the Cave]].
Several dialogues tackle questions about art, including rhetoric and rhapsody. Socrates says that poetry is inspired by the [[muses]], and is not rational. He speaks approvingly of this, and other forms of [[divine madness]] (drunkenness, eroticism, and dreaming) in the ''Phaedrus'',<ref>''Phaedrus ''(265a–c)</ref> and yet in the ''Republic'' wants to outlaw Homer's great poetry, and laughter as well. Scholars often view Plato's philosophy as at odds with rhetoric due to his criticisms of rhetoric in the ''[[Gorgias (dialogue)|Gorgias]]'' and his ambivalence toward rhetoric expressed in the ''[[Phaedrus (dialogue)|Phaedrus]]''. But other contemporary researchers contest the idea that Plato despised rhetoric and instead view his dialogues as a dramatization of complex rhetorical principles.{{sfn|Kastely|2015}} Plato made abundant use of mythological narratives in his own work; it is generally agreed that the main purpose for Plato in using myths was didactic.{{sfn|Jorgenson|2018|p=199}} He considered that only a few people were capable or interested in following a reasoned philosophical discourse, but men in general are attracted by stories and tales. Consequently, then, he used the myth to convey the conclusions of the philosophical reasoning.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Partenie |first1=Catalin |title=Plato's Myths |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-myths/ |website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=29 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170527053738/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-myths/|archive-date=27 May 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Notable examples include the story of [[Atlantis]], the [[Myth of Er]], and the [[Allegory of the Cave]].
 
=== Unwritten doctrines ===
{{Main|Plato's unwritten doctrines|Allegorical interpretations of Plato}}
 
Plato's unwritten doctrines are,{{sfn|Reale|1990|p=14f}} according to some ancient sources, the most fundamental metaphysical teaching of Plato, which he disclosed only orally, and some say only to his most trusted fellows, and which he may have kept secret from the public, although some scholars doubt these claims.<ref>Hans Joachim Krämer and John R. Catan, ''Plato and the Foundations of Metaphysics: A Work on the Theory of the Principles and Unwritten Doctrines of Plato with a Collection of the Fundamental Documents'' (SUNY Press, 1990).</ref> It is, however, said that Plato once disclosed this knowledge to the public in his lecture ''On the Good'' ({{lang|grc|Περὶ τἀγαθοῦ}}), in which the Good ({{lang|grc|τὸ ἀγαθόν}}) is identified with the One (the Unity, {{lang|grc|τὸ ἕν}}), the fundamental ontological principle. The most important aspect of this interpretation of Plato's metaphysics is the continuity between his teaching and the Neoplatonic interpretation of [[Plotinus]]. All the sources related to the {{lang|grc|ἄγραφα δόγματα}} have been collected by Konrad Gaiser and published as ''Testimonia Platonica''.{{sfn|Gaiser|1998}}


== Works ==
{{anchor|Dialogues}}<!--linked-->
{{anchor|Dialogues}}<!--linked-->
== Works ==
=== Themes ===
=== Themes ===
[[File:Anselm Feuerbach - Das Gastmahl. Nach Platon (zweite Fassung) - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|upright=1.8|Painting of a scene from Plato's ''[[Symposium (Plato)|Symposium]]'' ([[Anselm Feuerbach]], 1873)]]
[[File:Anselm Feuerbach - Das Gastmahl. Nach Platon (zweite Fassung) - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|upright=1.8|Painting of a scene from Plato's ''[[Symposium (Plato)|Symposium]]'' ([[Anselm Feuerbach]], 1873)]]
{{See also|List of speakers in Plato's dialogues}}
{{See also|List of speakers in Plato's dialogues}}
Plato never presents himself as a participant in any of the dialogues, and with the exception of the ''Apology'', there is no suggestion that he heard any of the dialogues firsthand. Some dialogues have no narrator but have a pure "dramatic" form, some dialogues are narrated by Socrates himself, who speaks in the first person. The ''Symposium'' is narrated by Apollodorus, a Socratic disciple, apparently to Glaucon. Apollodorus assures his listener that he is recounting the story, which took place when he himself was an infant, not from his own memory, but as remembered by Aristodemus, who told him the story years ago. The ''Theaetetus'' is also a peculiar case: a dialogue in dramatic form embedded within another dialogue in dramatic form. Some scholars take this as an indication that Plato had by this date wearied of the narrated form.{{sfn|Burnet|1928a|loc=§&nbsp;177}} In most of the dialogues, the primary speaker is Socrates, who employs a [[Socratic method|method]] of questioning which proceeds by a dialogue form called dialectic. The role of dialectic in Plato's thought is contested but there are two main interpretations: a type of reasoning and a method of intuition.{{sfn|Blackburn|1996|p=104}} [[Simon Blackburn]] adopts the first, saying that Plato's dialectic is "the process of eliciting the truth by means of questions aimed at opening out what is already implicitly known, or at exposing the contradictions and muddles of an opponent's position."{{sfn|Blackburn|1996|p=104}} [[Karl Popper]], on the other hand, claims that dialectic is the art of intuition for "visualising the divine originals, the Forms or Ideas, of unveiling the Great Mystery behind the common man's everyday world of appearances."{{sfn|Popper|1962|p=133}}
Plato never presents himself as a participant in any of the dialogues, and with the exception of the ''Apology'', there is no suggestion that he heard any of the dialogues firsthand. Some dialogues have no narrator but have a pure "dramatic" form, some dialogues are narrated by Socrates himself, who speaks in the first person. The ''Symposium'' is narrated by Apollodorus, a Socratic disciple, apparently to Glaucon. Apollodorus assures his listener that he is recounting the story, which took place when he himself was an infant, not from his own memory, but as remembered by Aristodemus, who told him the story years ago. In most of the dialogues, the primary speaker is Socrates, who employs a [[Socratic method|method]] of questioning which proceeds by a dialogue form.


=== Textual sources and history ===
=== Textual sources and history ===
[[File:Timaeus stephanus pages 32 33.jpg|thumb|upright=1|Volume 3, pp. 32–33, of the 1578 Stephanus edition of Plato, showing a passage of ''Timaeus'' with the Latin translation and notes of [[Jean de Serres]]]]
[[File:Timaeus stephanus pages 32 33.jpg|thumb|upright=1|Volume 3, pp. 32–33, of the 1578 Stephanus edition of Plato, showing a passage of ''Timaeus'' with the Latin translation and notes of [[Jean de Serres]]]]
{{See also|List of manuscripts of Plato's dialogues}}
{{See also|List of manuscripts of Plato's dialogues}}
During the early Renaissance, the Greek language and, along with it, Plato's texts were reintroduced to Western Europe by Byzantine scholars. Some 250 known manuscripts of Plato survive.{{sfn|Brumbaugh|Wells|1989}} In September or October 1484 [[Filippo Valori]] and [[Francesco Berlinghieri]] printed 1025 copies of [[Marsilio Ficino|Ficino's]] translation, using the printing press at the Dominican convent S.Jacopo di Ripoli.{{sfn|Allen|1975|p=12}} The 1578 edition<ref>''Platonis opera quae extant omnia'' edidit Henricus Stephanus, Genevae, 1578.</ref> of Plato's complete works published by Henricus Stephanus ([[Henri Estienne]]) in [[Geneva]] also included parallel Latin translation and running commentary by Joannes Serranus ([[Jean de Serres]]). It was this edition which established standard [[Stephanus pagination]], still in use today.{{sfn|Suzanne|2009}} The text of Plato as received today apparently represents the complete written philosophical work of Plato, based on the first century AD arrangement of [[Thrasyllus of Mendes]].{{sfn|Cooper|1997|pp=viii–xii}}<ref>{{harvnb|Irwin|2011|pp=64 & 74}}</ref> The modern standard complete English edition is the 1997 [[Hackett Publishing Company|Hackett]] ''Plato, Complete Works'', edited by John M. Cooper.{{sfn|Fine|1999a|p=482}}<ref>''[http://www.hackettpublishing.com/philosophy/complete-works Complete Works&nbsp;– Philosophy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120111190524/http://www.hackettpublishing.com/philosophy/complete-works |date=11 January 2012 }}''</ref>
During the early Renaissance, the Greek language and, along with it, Plato's texts were reintroduced to Western Europe by Byzantine scholars. Some 250 known Byzantine manuscripts of Plato survive.{{sfn|Brumbaugh|Wells|1989}} In September or October 1484 [[Filippo Valori]] and [[Francesco Berlinghieri]] printed 1025 copies of [[Marsilio Ficino|Ficino's]] translation.{{sfn|Allen|1975|p=12}} The 1578 edition of Plato's complete works published by Henricus Stephanus ([[Henri Estienne]]) in [[Geneva]] also included parallel Latin translation and running commentary by Joannes Serranus ([[Jean de Serres]]). It was this edition which established standard [[Stephanus pagination]], still in use today. The text of Plato as received today apparently represents the complete written philosophical work of Plato, based on the first century AD arrangement of [[Thrasyllus of Mendes]].{{sfn|Cooper|1997|pp=viii–xii}} Since the beginning of the 20th century, many papyri from the [[Hellenistic period]] through the third century AD containing text from Plato's dialogues have also been recovered from Egypt, which provide important early witnesses to the text.{{sfn|Brumbaugh|Wells|1989}} The modern standard complete English edition is the 1997 [[Hackett Publishing Company|Hackett]] ''Plato: Complete Works'', edited by John M. Cooper.{{sfn|Cooper|1997}}{{sfn|Fine|1999a|p=482}}


=== Authenticity ===
=== Authenticity ===
Thirty-five dialogues and thirteen letters (the [[Epistles (Plato)|''Epistles'']]) have traditionally been ascribed to Plato, though modern scholarship doubts the authenticity of at least some of these. Jowett<ref>[[Benjamin Jowett|B Jowett]], [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1682/1682-h/1682-h.htm ''Menexenus'': Appendix I (1st paragraph)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924202144/http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1682/1682-h/1682-h.htm |date=24 September 2015 }}.</ref> mentions in his Appendix to Menexenus, that works which bore the character of a writer were attributed to that writer even when the actual author was unknown.
{{further|Pseudo-Platonica}}
The works taken as genuine in antiquity but are now doubted by at least some modern scholars are: ''[[First Alcibiades|Alcibiades I]]'' (*),{{efn|(*) if there is no consensus among scholars as to whether Plato is the author, and (‡) if most scholars agree that Plato is ''not'' the author of the work. The extent to which scholars consider a dialogue to be authentic is noted in {{harvnb|Cooper|1997|pp=v–vi}}.}} ''[[Second Alcibiades|Alcibiades II]]'' (‡), ''[[Clitophon (dialogue)|Clitophon]]'' (*), ''[[Epinomis]]'' (‡), ''[[Epistles (Plato)|Letters]]'' (*), ''[[Hipparchus (dialogue)|Hipparchus]]'' (‡), ''[[Menexenus (dialogue)|Menexenus]]'' (*), ''[[Minos (dialogue)|Minos]]'' (‡), ''[[Rival Lovers|Lovers]]'' (‡), ''[[Theages]]'' (‡)
Thirty-five dialogues and thirteen letters (the [[Epistles (Plato)|''Epistles'']]) have traditionally been ascribed to Plato, though modern scholarship doubts the authenticity of at least some of these. There is a broad consensus among scholars to doubt the authenticity of ''[[Second Alcibiades|Alcibiades II]]'', ''[[Epinomis]]'', ''[[Hipparchus (dialogue)|Hipparchus]]'', ''[[Minos (dialogue)|Minos]]'', ''[[Rival Lovers|Lovers]]'', and ''[[Theages]]'', while opinions on ''[[First Alcibiades|Alcibiades I]]'', ''[[Clitophon (dialogue)|Clitophon]]'', ''[[Epistles (Plato)|Letters]]'', and ''[[Menexenus (dialogue)|Menexenus]]'' are more divided.{{sfn|Cooper|1997|pp=v–vi}} The following works were transmitted under Plato's name in antiquity, but were already considered spurious by the 1st century AD: ''[[Axiochus (dialogue)|Axiochus]]'', ''[[Definitions (Plato)|Definitions]]'', ''[[Demodocus (dialogue)|Demodocus]]'', ''[[Epigrams (Plato)|Epigrams]]'', ''[[Eryxias (dialogue)|Eryxias]]'', ''[[Halcyon (dialogue)|Halcyon]]'', ''[[On Justice]]'', ''[[On Virtue]]'', ''[[Sisyphus (dialogue)|Sisyphus]]''.{{sfn|Cooper|1997}}
The following works were transmitted under Plato's name in antiquity, but were already considered spurious by the 1st century AD: ''[[Axiochus (dialogue)|Axiochus]]'', ''[[Definitions (Plato)|Definitions]]'', ''[[Demodocus (dialogue)|Demodocus]]'', ''[[Epigrams (Plato)|Epigrams]]'', ''[[Eryxias (dialogue)|Eryxias]]'', ''[[Halcyon (dialogue)|Halcyon]]'', ''[[On Justice]]'', ''[[On Virtue]]'', ''[[Sisyphus (dialogue)|Sisyphus]]''.


=== Chronology ===
=== Chronology ===
No one knows the exact order Plato's dialogues were written in, nor the extent to which some might have been later revised and rewritten. The works are usually grouped into ''Early'' (sometimes by some into ''Transitional''), ''Middle'', and ''Late'' period; The following represents one relatively common division.<ref>See {{harvnb|Guthrie|1986}}; {{harvnb|Vlastos|1991}}; {{harvnb|Penner|1992}}; {{harvnb|Kahn|1996}}; {{harvnb|Fine|1999b}}.</ref>
No one knows the exact order Plato's dialogues were written in, nor the extent to which some might have been later revised and rewritten. The works are usually grouped into ''Early'', ''Middle'', and ''Late'' period; The following represents one relatively common division amongst developmentalist scholars.{{sfn|Fine|1999b}}
* Early: ''[[Apology (Plato)|Apology]]'', ''[[Charmides (dialogue)|Charmides]]'', ''[[Crito]]'', ''[[Euthyphro]]'', ''[[Gorgias (dialogue)|Gorgias]]'', ''[[Hippias Minor]]'', ''[[Hippias Major]]'', ''[[Ion (dialogue)|Ion]]'', ''[[Laches (dialogue)|Laches]]'', ''[[Lysis (dialogue)|Lysis]]'', ''[[Protagoras (dialogue)|Protagoras]]''
* Early: ''[[Apology (Plato)|Apology]]'', ''[[Charmides (dialogue)|Charmides]]'', ''[[Crito]]'', ''[[Euthyphro]]'', ''[[Gorgias (dialogue)|Gorgias]]'', ''[[Hippias Minor]]'', ''[[Hippias Major]]'', ''[[Ion (dialogue)|Ion]]'', ''[[Laches (dialogue)|Laches]]'', ''[[Lysis (dialogue)|Lysis]]'', ''[[Protagoras (dialogue)|Protagoras]]''
* Middle: ''[[Cratylus (dialogue)|Cratylus]]'', ''[[Euthydemus (dialogue)|Euthydemus]]'', ''[[Meno]]'', ''[[Parmenides (dialogue)|Parmenides]]'', ''[[Phaedo]]'', ''[[Phaedrus (dialogue)|Phaedrus]]'', ''[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'', ''[[Symposium (Plato)|Symposium]]'', ''[[Theaetetus (dialogue)|Theatetus]]''
* Middle: ''[[Cratylus (dialogue)|Cratylus]]'', ''[[Euthydemus (dialogue)|Euthydemus]]'', ''[[Meno]]'', ''[[Parmenides (dialogue)|Parmenides]]'', ''[[Phaedo]]'', ''[[Phaedrus (dialogue)|Phaedrus]]'', ''[[Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'', ''[[Symposium (Plato)|Symposium]]'', ''[[Theaetetus (dialogue)|Theatetus]]''
* Late: ''[[Critias (dialogue)|Critias]]'', ''[[Sophist (dialogue)|Sophist]]'', ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'', ''[[Philebus]]'', ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]].{{sfn|Dodds|2004}}''
* Late: ''[[Critias (dialogue)|Critias]]'', ''[[Sophist (dialogue)|Sophist]]'', ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'', ''[[Philebus]]'', ''[[Laws (dialogue)|Laws]].''


Whereas those classified as "early dialogues" often conclude in [[aporia]], the so-called "middle dialogues" provide more clearly stated positive teachings that are often ascribed to Plato such as the theory of Forms. The remaining dialogues are classified as "late" and are generally agreed to be difficult and challenging pieces of philosophy.{{sfn|Cooper|1997|p=xiv}} It should, however, be kept in mind that many of the positions in the ordering are still highly disputed, and also that the very notion that Plato's dialogues can or should be "ordered" is by no means universally accepted,{{sfn|Cooper|1997}}{{efn|Increasingly in the most recent Plato scholarship, writers are skeptical of the notion that the order of Plato's writings can be established with any precision.<ref>{{harvnb|Kraut|2013}}; {{harvnb|Schofield|2002}}; and {{harvnb|Rowe|2006}}.</ref>}} though Plato's works are still often characterized as falling at least roughly into three groups stylistically.<ref name="auto" />
Whereas those classified as "early dialogues" often conclude in [[aporia]], the so-called "middle dialogues" provide more clearly stated positive teachings that are often ascribed to Plato such as the theory of Forms. The remaining dialogues are classified as "late" and are generally agreed to be difficult and challenging pieces of philosophy.{{sfn|Cooper|1997|p=xiv}} It should, however, be kept in mind that many of the positions in the ordering are still highly disputed, and also that the very notion that Plato's dialogues can or should be "ordered" is by no means universally accepted.{{sfn|Cooper|1997}} In the most recent Plato scholarship, writers are increasingly skeptical of the notion that the order of Plato's writings can be established with any precision,{{sfn|Kraut|2013}} though Plato's works are still often characterized as falling at least roughly into three groups stylistically.
 
=== Printed editions ===
Plato's works have been published in many languages and editions in print. English editions include:
* [[Benjamin Jowett]] translation, 5 vols. (1892)


== Legacy ==
== Legacy ==
[[File:MANNapoli_124545_plato's_academy_mosaic.jpg|thumb|[[Plato's Academy mosaic]] in the villa of T. Siminius Stephanus in [[Pompeii]], around 100 BC to 100 CE]]
===Medieval era===
=== Unwritten doctrines ===
During the Islamic Golden ages, Neoplatonism was revived from its founding father, Plotinus.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Willinsky |first=John |title=The Intellectual Properties of Learning: A Prehistory from Saint Jerome to John Locke |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]] |year=2018 |isbn=978-0226487922 |edition=1st |location=Chicago |publication-date=2 January 2018 |pages=Chapter 6}}</ref> Neoplatonism, a philosophical current that permeated Islamic scholarship, accentuated one facet of the Qur’anic conception of God—the transcendent—while seemingly neglecting another—the creative. This philosophical tradition, introduced by [[Al-Farabi]] and subsequently elaborated upon by figures such as [[Avicenna]], postulated that all phenomena emanated from the divine source.{{sfn|Aminrazavi|2021}} It functioned as a conduit, bridging the transcendental nature of the divine with the tangible reality of creation. In the Islamic context, Neoplatonism facilitated the integration of Platonic philosophy with mystical Islamic thought, fostering a synthesis of ancient philosophical wisdom and religious insight.{{sfn|Aminrazavi|2021}} Inspired by Plato's Republic, Al-Farabi extended his inquiry beyond mere political theory, proposing an ideal city governed by [[Philosopher king|philosopher-kings]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Stefaniuk |first=Tomasz |date=5 December 2022 |title=Man in Early Islamic Philosophy – Al-Kindi and Al-Farabi |journal=Ruch Filozoficzny |volume=78 |issue=3 |pages=65–84 |doi=10.12775/RF.2022.023 |issn=2545-3173|doi-access=free }}</ref> Plato is also referenced by Jewish philosopher and Talmudic scholar [[Maimonides]] in his ''[[Guide for the Perplexed]]''.
{{Main|Plato's unwritten doctrines|Allegorical interpretations of Plato}}
[[File:Sanzio 01 Plato Aristotle.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|''[[The School of Athens]]'' [[fresco]] features Plato (left), holding his ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' while he gestures to the heavens. Aristotle (right) gestures to the earth while holding a copy of ''[[Nicomachean Ethics]]''.]]
[[Plato's unwritten doctrines]] are,{{sfn|Rodriguez-Grandjean|1998}}<ref>{{harvnb|Reale|1990}}. Cf. p. 14 and onwards.</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Krämer|1990}}. Cf. pp. 38–47.</ref> according to some ancient sources, the most fundamental metaphysical teaching of Plato, which he disclosed only orally, and some say only to his most trusted fellows, and which he may have kept secret from the public, although many modern scholars{{who|date=January 2023}} doubt these claims. A reason for not revealing it to everyone is partially discussed in ''Phaedrus'' where Plato criticizes the written transmission of knowledge as faulty, favouring instead the spoken ''[[logos]]'': "he who has knowledge of the just and the good and beautiful ... will not, when in earnest, write them in ink, sowing them through a pen with words, which cannot defend themselves by argument and cannot teach the truth effectually."<ref>''Phaedrus'' 276c</ref> It is, however, said that Plato once disclosed this knowledge to the public in his lecture ''On the Good'' ({{lang|grc|Περὶ τἀγαθοῦ}}), in which the Good ({{lang|grc|τὸ ἀγαθόν}}) is identified with the One (the Unity, {{lang|grc|τὸ ἕν}}), the fundamental ontological principle.
Many of these commentaries on Plato were translated from Arabic into Latin, in which form they influenced medieval scholastics.{{sfn|Burrell|1998}}{{sfn|Hasse|2002|pp=33–45}} Plato's thought is often compared with that of his most famous student, [[Aristotle]], whose reputation during the Western [[Middle Ages]] so completely eclipsed that of Plato that the [[Scholasticism|Scholastic]] philosophers referred to Aristotle as "the Philosopher". The only Platonic work known to western scholarship was ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'', until translations into Latin were made beginning in the 12th century. However, the study of Plato continued in the [[Byzantine Empire]], [[Islamic Golden Age|the Caliphates during the Islamic Golden Age]], and [[Golden age of Jewish culture in Spain|Spain during the Golden age of Jewish culture]].
 
The first witness who mentions its existence is Aristotle, who in his ''[[Physics (Aristotle)|Physics]]'' writes: "It is true, indeed, that the account he gives there [i.e. in ''Timaeus''] of the participant is different from what he says in his so-called ''unwritten teachings'' ({{transl-grc|ἄγραφα δόγματα}})."<ref>''Physics'' 209b</ref> In ''[[Metaphysics (Aristotle)|Metaphysics]]'' he writes: "Now since the Forms are the causes of everything else, he [i.e. Plato] supposed that their elements are the elements of all things. Accordingly, the material principle is the Great and Small [i.e. the Dyad], and the essence is the One ({{lang|grc|τὸ ἕν}}), since the numbers are derived from the Great and Small by participation in the One".<ref name="auto1">''Metaphysics'' 987b</ref> "From this account it is clear that he only employed two causes: that of the essence, and the material cause; for the Forms are the cause of the essence in everything else, and the One is the cause of it in the Forms. He also tells us what the material substrate is of which the Forms are predicated in the case of sensible things, and the One in that of the Forms{{snd}}that it is this the duality (the Dyad, {{lang|grc|ἡ δυάς}}), the Great and Small ({{lang|grc|τὸ μέγα καὶ τὸ μικρόν}}). Further, he assigned to these two elements respectively the causation of good and of evil".<ref name="auto1" />


The most important aspect of this interpretation of Plato's metaphysics is the continuity between his teaching and the Neoplatonic interpretation of [[Plotinus]]{{efn|[[Plotinus]] describes this in the last part of his final ''[[Enneads|Ennead]]'' (VI, 9) entitled ''On the Good, or the One'' ({{lang|grc|Περὶ τἀγαθοῦ ἢ τοῦ ἑνός}}). Jens Halfwassen states in [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2006/2006-08-16.html ''Der Aufstieg zum Einen'] (2006) that "Plotinus' ontology{{snd}}which should be called Plotinus' [[henology]]{{snd}}is a rather accurate philosophical renewal and continuation of Plato's unwritten doctrine, i.e. the doctrine rediscovered by Krämer and Gaiser."}} or [[Ficino]]{{efn|In one of his letters (Epistolae 1612) [[Ficino]] writes: "The main goal of the divine Plato ... is to show one principle of things, which he called the One ({{lang|grc|τὸ ἕν}})", cf. {{harvnb|Montoriola|1926|p=147}}.}} which has been considered erroneous by many but may in fact have been directly influenced by oral transmission of Plato's doctrine. A modern scholar who recognized the importance of the unwritten doctrine of Plato was [[Heinrich Gomperz]] who described it in his speech during the 7th [[International Congress of Philosophy]] in 1930.{{sfn|Gomperz|1931}} All the sources related to the {{lang|grc|ἄγραφα δόγματα}} have been collected by Konrad Gaiser and published as ''Testimonia Platonica''.{{sfn|Gaiser|1998}}
===Modern===
=== Modern reception ===
{{see also|Transmission of the Greek Classics}}
{{see also|Transmission of the Greek Classics}}
Plato's thought is often compared with that of his most famous student, [[Aristotle]], whose reputation during the Western [[Middle Ages]] so completely eclipsed that of Plato that the [[Scholasticism|Scholastic]] philosophers referred to Aristotle as "the Philosopher". The only Platonic work known to western scholarship was ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'', until translations were made after the fall of [[Constantinople]], which occurred during 1453.<ref>C.U. M.Smith – [https://books.google.com/books?id=NcTHBAAAQBAJ&q=neuroscience+twentieth+century Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience (page 1)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161223104930/https://books.google.com/books?id=NcTHBAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=neuroscience+twentieth+century&sa=X&ei=KLiOVeXlO8zd7QbIxr2wDg&redir_esc=y&hl=en#v=onepage&q=neuroscience%20twentieth%20century&f=false|date=23 December 2016}} Springer Science & Business, 1 January 2014, 374 pages, ''Volume 6 of History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences SpringerLink : Bücher'' {{isbn|94-017-8774-3}} [Retrieved 27 June 2015]</ref> However, the study of Plato continued in the [[Byzantine Empire]], [[Islamic Golden Age|the Caliphates during the Islamic Golden Age]], and [[Golden age of Jewish culture in Spain|Spain during Golden age of Jewish culture]]. During the early Islamic era, [[Iran|Persian]], Arab, and Jewish scholars translated much of Plato into Arabic and wrote [[Close reading|commentaries]] and interpretations on Plato's, Aristotle's and other Platonist philosophers' works (see [[Al-Kindi]], [[Al-Farabi]], [[Avicenna]], [[Averroes]], [[Hunayn ibn Ishaq]]). Plato is also referenced by Jewish philosopher and Talmudic scholar [[Maimonides]] in his ''[[The Guide for the Perplexed]]''. Many of these commentaries on Plato were translated from Arabic into Latin and as such influenced Medieval scholastic philosophers.<ref>See {{harvnb|Burrell|1998}} and {{harvnb|Hasse|2002|pp=33–45}}.</ref>
During the [[Renaissance]], [[Gemistos Plethon]] brought Plato's original writings to Florence from Constantinople in the century of its [[Fall of Constantinople|fall]]. Many of the greatest early modern scientists and artists who broke with [[Scholasticism]], with the support of the Plato-inspired [[Lorenzo de' Medici|Lorenzo]] (grandson of Cosimo), saw Plato's philosophy as the basis for progress in the arts and sciences. The 17th century [[Cambridge Platonists]] sought to reconcile Plato's more problematic beliefs, such as [[metempsychosis]] and [[polyamory]], with Christianity.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=Carrigan |first=Henry L. Jr. |title=Cambridge Platonists |year=2012 |orig-date=2011 |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization |location=[[Chichester, West Sussex]] |publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]] |doi=10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc0219 |isbn=978-1405157629}}</ref> By the 19th century, Plato's reputation was restored, and at least on par with Aristotle's. Plato's influence has been especially strong in mathematics and the sciences. Plato's resurgence further inspired some of the greatest advances in logic since Aristotle, primarily through [[Gottlob Frege]]. [[Albert Einstein]] suggested that the scientist who takes philosophy seriously would have to avoid systematization and take on many different roles, and possibly appear as a Platonist or Pythagorean, in that such a one would have "the viewpoint of logical simplicity as an indispensable and effective tool of his research."{{sfn|Einstein|1949|pp=683–684}} British philosopher [[Alfred North Whitehead]] said: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of [[Note (typography)|footnotes]] to Plato."{{sfn|Whitehead|1978|p=39}}<ref>{{Cite web |title=A.N Whitehead on Plato |url=https://www.college.columbia.edu/core/content/whitehead-plato |access-date= |website=Columbia College |archive-date=29 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231029153617/https://www.college.columbia.edu/core/content/whitehead-plato |url-status=live }}</ref> Adapting examples from Plato's ''[[Theaetetus (dialogue)|Theaetetus]]'', [[Edmund Gettier]] famously demonstrated the [[Gettier problem]] for the "justified true belief account" of knowledge, challenging the prevalent notion in Analytic philosophy at the time that had been popularized by [[A. J. Ayer]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gettier |first1=E. L. |title=Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? |journal=Analysis |date=1 June 1963 |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=121–123 |doi=10.1093/analys/23.6.121}}</ref>
[[File:Sanzio 01 Plato Aristotle.jpg|thumb|upright|''[[The School of Athens]]'' [[fresco]] by [[Raphael]] features Plato (left) also as a central figure, holding his ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' while he gestures to the heavens. Aristotle (right) gestures to the earth while holding a copy of his ''[[Nicomachean Ethics]]'' in his hand.]]
During the [[Renaissance]], [[George Gemistos Plethon]] brought Plato's original writings to Florence from Constantinople in the century of its fall. Many of the greatest early modern scientists and artists who broke with [[Scholasticism]], with the support of the Plato-inspired [[Lorenzo de' Medici|Lorenzo]] (grandson of Cosimo), saw Plato's philosophy as the basis for progress in the arts and sciences. The 17th century [[Cambridge Platonists]], sought to reconcile Plato's more problematic beliefs, such as [[metempsychosis]] and polyamory, with Christianity.<ref name="Carrigan 2012">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Carrigan |first=Henry L. Jr. |title=Cambridge Platonists |year=2012 |origyear=2011 |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization |location=[[Chichester, West Sussex]] |publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]] |doi=10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc0219 |isbn=978-1405157629}}</ref> By the 19th century, Plato's reputation was restored, and at least on par with Aristotle's. Plato's influence has been especially strong in mathematics and the sciences. Plato's resurgence further inspired some of the greatest advances in logic since Aristotle, primarily through [[Gottlob Frege]]. [[Albert Einstein]] suggested that the scientist who takes philosophy seriously would have to avoid systematization and take on many different roles, and possibly appear as a Platonist or Pythagorean, in that such a one would have "the viewpoint of logical simplicity as an indispensable and effective tool of his research."{{sfn|Einstein|1949|pp=683–684}}
 
==== Criticism ====
Many recent philosophers have also diverged from what some would describe as ideals characteristic of traditional Platonism. [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] notoriously attacked Plato's "idea of the good itself" along with many fundamentals of Christian morality, which he interpreted as "Platonism for the masses" in ''[[Beyond Good and Evil]]'' (1886). [[Martin Heidegger]] argued against Plato's alleged obfuscation of ''[[Being]]'' in his incomplete tome, ''[[Being and Time]]'' (1927), and the philosopher of science [[Karl Popper]] argued in the first volume of ''[[The Open Society and Its Enemies]]'' (1945) that Plato's alleged proposal for a [[utopia]]n political regime in the ''[[The Republic (Plato)|Republic]]'' was prototypically [[Totalitarianism|totalitarian]]. [[Edmund Gettier]] famously demonstrated the [[Gettier problem|problems]] of the justified true belief account of knowledge. That the modern theory of justified true belief as knowledge, which Gettier addresses, is equivalent to Plato's is accepted by some scholars but rejected by others.{{sfn|Fine|1979|p=366}}


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
{{notelist|30em}}
{{notelist|30em}}
{{Reflist|20em}}


== References ==
== References ==
{{Reflist|20em}}
=== Works cited ===
'''Primary sources (Greek and Roman)'''
{{Refbegin|30em}}
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* [[Apuleius]], ''De Dogmate Platonis'', I. See original text in [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/apuleius/apuleius.dog1.shtml Latin Library].
* [[Aristophanes]], ''[[The Wasps]]''. See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0043:line=1 Perseus program].
* [[Aristotle]], ''[[Metaphysics (Aristotle)|Metaphysics]]''. See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0051:book=1:section=980a Perseus program].
* [[Cicero]], ''[[De Divinatione]]'', I. See original text in [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/divinatione1.shtml Latin library].
* {{cite LotEP |chapter=Plato }}
* {{cite wikisource |author=Plato |wslink=Charmides (Plato) |title=Charmides |translator=[[Benjamin Jowett|Jowett, Benjamin]]}} See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0175:text=Charm.:section=153a Perseus program].
* {{cite wikisource |author=Plato |title=Gorgias |translator=[[Benjamin Jowett|Jowett Benjamin]]}} See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0177:text=Gorg.:section=447a Perseus program].
* {{cite book |author=Plato |translator-last=Burnet |translator-first=John |year=1903 |title=Parmenides |url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0173:text=Parm.:section=126a&redirect=true |publisher=Oxford University}} republished by: {{cite web |title=Perseus Digital Library Project |editor-last=Crane |editor-first=Gregory |url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/about}}
* {{cite wikisource |author=Plato |title=The Republic |translator=[[Benjamin Jowett|Jowett Benjamin]]}} See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0168 Perseus program].
* {{cite wikisource |author=Plutarch |author-link=Plutarch |translator=[[John Dryden|Dryden, John]] |plaintitle=Lives |wslink=Lives (Dryden translation) |chapter=Pericles |year=1683 |orig-date=written in the late 1st century}} See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0181:text=Per.:chapter=39:section=1 Perseus program].
* {{cite wikisource |author=Seneca the Younger |author-link=Seneca the Younger |title=Moral Letters to Lucilius: Letter 58 |wslink=Moral letters to Lucilius/Letter 58 |translator=Richard Mott Gummere}} See original text in [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/sen/seneca.ep6.shtml Latin Library].
* {{cite wikisource |author=Thucydides |author-link=Thucydides |translator=[[Richard Crawley|Crawley, Richard]] |title=History of the Peloponnesian War}}, V, VIII. See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0199 Perseus program].
* [[Xenophon]], ''[[Memorabilia (Xenophon)|Memorabilia]]''. See original text in [https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0207:book=1:chapter=1:section=1 Perseus program].
{{Refend}}
'''Secondary sources'''
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |last=Albert |first=Karl |title=Griechische Religion und platonische Philosophie |publisher=Felix Meiner Verlag |location=Hamburg |year=1980 }}
* {{cite book |last=Albert |first=Karl |title=Einführung in die philosophische Mystik |publisher=Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft |location=Darmstadt |year=1996 }}
* {{cite book |last=Allen |first=Michael J.B. |chapter=Introduction |title=Marsilio Ficino: The Philebus Commentary |pages=1–58 |publisher=University of California Press |year=1975 }}
* {{cite book |last=Allen |first=Michael J.B. |chapter=Introduction |title=Marsilio Ficino: The Philebus Commentary |pages=1–58 |publisher=University of California Press |year=1975 }}
* {{cite SEP| url-id=arabic-islamic-mysticism | title=Mysticism in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy |last=Aminrazavi | first = Mehdi |date=2021}}
* {{cite book | editor1-last = Baird | editor1-first = Forrest E. | editor2-first= Walter |editor2-last=Kaufmann |title=Philosophic Classics: From Plato to Derrida |edition=Fifth |publisher=Pearson Prentice Hall |year=2008 |location=Upper Saddle River, New Jersey |isbn=978-0-13-158591-1 |ref={{harvid|Baird & Kaufmann|2008}}}}
* {{cite book | editor1-last = Baird | editor1-first = Forrest E. | editor2-first= Walter |editor2-last=Kaufmann |title=Philosophic Classics: From Plato to Derrida |edition=Fifth |publisher=Pearson Prentice Hall |year=2008 |location=Upper Saddle River, New Jersey |isbn=978-0-13-158591-1 |ref={{harvid|Baird & Kaufmann|2008}}}}
* {{cite book |last=Blackburn |first=Simon |title=The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1996 }}
* {{cite book |last=Bloom |first=Harold |year=1982 |title=Agon |url=https://archive.org/details/agontowardstheor0000bloo |url-access=registration |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Blössner |first=Norbert |chapter=The City-Soul Analogy |editor-last=Ferrari |editor-first=G.R.F. |translator= G.R.F. Ferrari |title=The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2007 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Blössner |first=Norbert |chapter=The City-Soul Analogy |editor-last=Ferrari |editor-first=G.R.F. |translator= G.R.F. Ferrari |title=The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2007 }}
* {{cite journal |last=Borody |first=W.A. |year=1998 |title=Figuring the Phallogocentric Argument with Respect to the Classical Greek Philosophical Tradition |journal=Nebula, A Netzine of the Arts and Science |volume=13 |pages=1–27 |url=http://kenstange.com/nebula/feat013/feat013.html }}
* {{cite book |last=Boyer |first=Carl B. |year=1991 |title=A History of Mathematics |edition=Second |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |editor-last=Merzbach |editor-first=Uta C. |editor-link=Uta Merzbach |isbn=978-0-471-54397-8 |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofmathema00boye }}
* {{cite book |last=Brandwood |first=Leonard |title=The Chronology of Plato's Dialogues |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1990 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Brickhouse |first1=Thomas |last2=Smith |first2=Nicholas D. |title=Plato |website=The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/plato/ |editor1-last=Fieser |editor1-first=James |editor2-last=Dowden |editor2-first=Bradley |access-date=3 April 2014 }}
* {{cite book |last=Browne |first=Sir Thomas |title=Pseudodoxia Epidemica |volume=IV |chapter=XII |chapter-url=http://penelope.uchicago.edu/pseudodoxia/pseudo412.html#b26 |edition=6th |year=1672 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Brumbaugh |last2=Wells |first1=Robert S. |first2=Rulon S. |title=Completing Yale's Microfilm Project |journal=The Yale University Library Gazette |volume=64 |number=1/2 |date=October 1989 |pages=73–75 |jstor=40858970 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Brumbaugh |last2=Wells |first1=Robert S. |first2=Rulon S. |title=Completing Yale's Microfilm Project |journal=The Yale University Library Gazette |volume=64 |number=1/2 |date=October 1989 |pages=73–75 |jstor=40858970 }}
* {{cite book |last=Burnet |first=John |title=Plato's Phaedo |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1911 |url=https://archive.org/details/platosphaedo00platuoft }}
* {{cite book |last=Burnet |first=John |title=Greek Philosophy: Part I: Thales to Plato |publisher=MacMillan |year=1928a |url=https://archive.org/details/burnetsgreekphil00burnuoft }}
* {{cite book |last=Burnet |first=John |title=Platonism |publisher=University of California Press |year=1928b }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Cairns |first=Huntington |editor1-last=Hamilton |editor1-first=Edith |editor2-last=Cairns |editor2-first=Huntington |entry=Introduction |title=The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1961 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Burrell |first=David |entry=Platonism in Islamic Philosophy |title=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |year=1998 |editor-last=Craig |editor-first=Edward |volume=7 |pages=429–430}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Burrell |first=David |entry=Platonism in Islamic Philosophy |title=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |year=1998 |editor-last=Craig |editor-first=Edward |volume=7 |pages=429–430}}
* {{cite book |title=Plato: Complete Works |editor1-first=John M. |editor1-last=Cooper |editor2-first=D.S. |editor2-last=Hutchinson |ref={{harvid|Cooper|1997}} |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=1997}}
* {{cite book |title=Plato: Complete Works |editor1-first=John M. |editor1-last=Cooper |editor2-first=D.S. |editor2-last=Hutchinson |ref={{harvid|Cooper|1997}} |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=1997}}
* {{cite book |last=Dillon |first=John |title=The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 }}
* {{cite book |last=Dillon |first=John |title=The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 }}
* {{cite book |last=Dodds |first=E.R. |title=Plato Gorgias |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1959 }}
* {{cite book |last=Dodds |first=E.R. |title=The Greeks and the Irrational |publisher=University of California Press |year=2004 |orig-year=1951 }}
* {{cite book |last=Dorter |first=Kenneth |title=The Transformation of Plato's Republic |publisher=Lexington Books |year=2006 }}
* {{cite book |last=Dorter |first=Kenneth |title=The Transformation of Plato's Republic |publisher=Lexington Books |year=2006 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Einstein |first=Albert |entry=Remarks to the Essays Appearing in this Collective Volume |editor-last=Schilpp |title=Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist |series=The Library of Living Philosophers |volume=7 |publisher=MJF Books |year=1949 |pages=663–688 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Einstein |first=Albert |entry=Remarks to the Essays Appearing in this Collective Volume |editor-last=Schilpp |title=Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist |series=The Library of Living Philosophers |volume=7 |publisher=MJF Books |year=1949 |pages=663–688 }}
* {{cite journal |last=Fine |first=Gail |title=Knowledge and Logos in the Theaetetus |journal=Philosophical Review |volume=88 |pages=366–397 |number=3 |date=July 1979 |doi=10.2307/2184956 |jstor=2184956}} Reprinted in {{harvnb|Fine|2003}}.
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Fine |first=Gail |entry=Selected Bibliography |title=Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology |pages=481–494 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1999a }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Fine |first=Gail |entry=Selected Bibliography |title=Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology |pages=481–494 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1999a }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Fine |first=Gail |entry=Introduction |title=Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul |pages=1–33 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1999b }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Fine |first=Gail |entry=Introduction |title=Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul |pages=1–33 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1999b }}
* {{cite book |last=Fine |first=Gail |chapter=Introduction |title=Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 }}
* {{cite book |last=Fine |first=Gail |chapter=Introduction |title=Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 }}
* {{cite book |last=Gadamer |first=Hans-Georg |title=Dialogue and Dialectic |chapter=Plato's Unwritten Dialectic |year=1980 |orig-year=1968 |publisher=Yale University Press |pages=124–155 }}
* {{cite book |last=Gaiser |first=Konrad |title=Testimonia Platonica: Le antiche testimonianze sulle dottrine non scritte di Platone |location=Milan |publisher=Vita e Pensiero |year=1998 |editor-last=Reale |editor-first=Giovanni }}  
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Gadamer |first=Hans-Georg |entry=Introduzione |editor-last=Girgenti |editor-first=Giuseppe |title=La nuova interpretazione di Platone |publisher=Rusconi Libri |year=1997 |location=Milan }}
* {{cite journal |title=Plato's Enigmatic Lecture 'On the Good' |last=Gaiser |first=Konrad |journal=Phronesis |volume=25 |issue=1 |year=1980 |pages=5–37 |doi=10.1163/156852880x00025}}
* {{cite book |last=Gaiser |first=Konrad |title=Testimonia Platonica: Le antiche testimonianze sulle dottrine non scritte di Platone |location=Milan |publisher=Vita e Pensiero |year=1998 |editor-last=Reale |editor-first=Giovanni }} First published as "Testimonia Platonica. Quellentexte zur Schule und mündlichen Lehre Platons" as an appendix to Gaiser's ''Platons Ungeschriebene Lehre'', Stuttgart, 1963.
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Gomperz |first=H. |entry=Plato's System of Philosophy |editor-first=G. |editor-last=Ryle |title=Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Philosophy |location=London |year=1931 |pages=426–431 }} Reprinted in Gomperz, H. (1953). ''Philosophical Studies''. Boston: Christopher Publishing House 1953, pp.&nbsp;119–124.
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Grondin |first=Jean |entry=Gadamer and the Tübingen School |title=Hermeneutic Philosophy and Plato: Gadamer's Response to the Philebus |year=2010 |editor1-last=Gill |editor1-first=Christopher |editor2-last=Renaud |editor2-first=François |publisher=Academia Verlag |pages=139–156 }}
* {{cite book |last=Guthrie |first=W.K.C. |title=A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 4, Plato: The Man and His Dialogues: Earlier Period |year=1986 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-31101-4 }}
* {{cite book |last=Guthrie |first=W.K.C. |title=A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 4, Plato: The Man and His Dialogues: Earlier Period |year=1986 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-31101-4 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Hasse |first=Dag Nikolaus |entry=Plato Arabico-latinus |editor1-last=Gersh |editor2-last=Hoenen |title=The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach |publisher=De Gruyter |year=2002 |pages=33–66 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Hasse |first=Dag Nikolaus |entry=Plato Arabico-latinus |editor1-last=Gersh |editor2-last=Hoenen |title=The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach |publisher=De Gruyter |year=2002 |pages=33–66 }}
* {{cite book |last=Irwin |first=T.H. |title=Plato: Gorgias |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1979 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Jorgenson |first1=Chad |title=The Embodied Soul in Plato's Later Thought |date=5 April 2018 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-316-80052-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I1FSDwAAQBAJ |access-date=15 May 2025 |language=en}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Irwin |first=T.H. |entry=The Platonic Corpus |title=The Oxford Handbook of Plato |editor-last=Fine |editor-first=G. |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Kastely |first1=James L. |title=The Rhetoric of Plato's Republic: Democracy and the Philosophical Problem of Persuasion |date=25 August 2015 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-27876-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xRBDCgAAQBAJ |access-date=15 May 2025 |language=en}}
* {{cite book |last=Jones |first=Daniel |editor1-last=Roach |editor1-first=Peter |editor2-last=Hartman |editor2-first=James |editor3-last=Setter |editor3-first=Jane |title=Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary |url=https://archive.org/details/englishpronounci00dani |url-access=registration |edition=17 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2006 }}
* {{cite web |last=Kraut |first=Richard |title=Plato |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato/ |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |publisher=Stanford University |date=11 September 2013 |access-date=3 April 2014 |archive-date=6 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180906142533/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last=Kahn |first=Charles H. | author-link = Charles H. Kahn |title=Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form |year=1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-64830-1 }}
* {{cite book |last=Kierkegaard |first=Søren |title=The Concept of Irony |year=1992 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-02072-3 |chapter=Plato }}
* {{cite book |title=Plato and the Foundations of Metaphysics: A Work on the Theory of the Principles and Unwritten Doctrines of Plato with a Collection of the Fundamental Documents |first=Hans Joachim |last=Krämer |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=1990 |editor-first=John R. |editor-last=Catan |isbn=978-0-7914-0433-1 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Lee |first=M.-K. |entry=The ''Theaetetus'' |editor-last=Fine |editor-first=G. |title=The Oxford Handbook of Plato |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |pages=411–436 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Lee |first=M.-K. |entry=The ''Theaetetus'' |editor-last=Fine |editor-first=G. |title=The Oxford Handbook of Plato |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |pages=411–436 }}
* {{cite web |last=Kraut |first=Richard |title=Plato |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato/ |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |publisher=Stanford University |date=11 September 2013 |access-date=3 April 2014 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Lackner |first=D. F. |entry=The Camaldolese Academy: Ambrogio Traversari, Marsilio Ficino and the Christian Platonic Tradition |editor1-last=Allen |editor2-last=Rees |title=Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy |publisher=Brill |year=2001 }}
* {{cite book |last=Meinwald |first=Constance Chu |title=Plato's Parmenides |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1991 }}
* {{cite book |last=McDowell |first=J. |title=Plato: Theaetetus |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1973 }}
* {{cite book |last=McDowell |first=J. |title=Plato: Theaetetus |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1973 }}
* {{cite journal |last=McEvoy |first=James |year=1984 |title=Plato and The Wisdom of Egypt |journal=Irish Philosophical Journal |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=1–24 |url=http://poiesis.nlx.com/display.cfm?clientId=0&advquery=toc.sect.ipj.1.2&infobase=postoc.nfo&softpage=GetClient42&view=browse |issn=0266-9080 |access-date=3 December 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071205153424/http://poiesis.nlx.com/display.cfm?clientId=0&advquery=toc.sect.ipj.1.2&infobase=postoc.nfo&softpage=GetClient42&view=browse |archive-date=5 December 2007 |doi=10.5840/irishphil1984125 }}
* {{cite book |first=Karl Markgraf von |last=Montoriola |title=Briefe Des Mediceerkreises Aus Marsilio Ficino's Epistolarium |publisher=Juncker |location=Berlin |year=1926 }}
* {{cite book |last=Nails |first=Debra |title=The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-87220-564-2 }}
* {{cite book |last=Nails |first=Debra |title=The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-87220-564-2 }}
* {{cite book |last=Nails |first=Debra |title=A Companion to Plato |editor-last=Benson |editor-first=Hugh H. |year=2006 |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |isbn=978-1-4051-1521-6 |chapter=The Life of Plato of Athens }}
* {{cite book|last=Nails|first=Debra|title=A Companion to Plato edited by Hugh H. Benson |year=2006 | publisher=Blackwell Publishing| isbn=1-4051-1521-1|chapter=The Life of Plato of Athens|pages=1–12 |url=https://www.academia.edu/5135774 |doi=10.1002/9780470996256.ch1}}
* {{cite book |last=Nietzsche |first=Friedrich Wilhelm |title=Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe (in German) |year=1967 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-013912-9 |chapter=Vorlesungsaufzeichnungen }}
* {{cite journal |last=Notopoulos |first=A. |title=The Name of Plato |journal=Classical Philology |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=135–145 |date=April 1939 |doi=10.1086/362227 |s2cid=161505593 }}
* {{cite journal |last=Notopoulos |first=A. |title=The Name of Plato |journal=Classical Philology |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=135–145 |date=April 1939 |doi=10.1086/362227 |s2cid=161505593 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Penner |first=Terry |entry=Socrates and the Early Dialogues |editor-last=Kraut |editor-first=Richard |title=The Cambridge Companion to Plato |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1992 |pages=121–169 }}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |title=Plato |encyclopedia=Britannica Online |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Plato|last=Meinwald |first=Constance|date=16 June 2023 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |title=Plato |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedic Dictionary The Helios Volume XVI (in Greek) |year=1952 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.stoa.org/sol-bin/search.pl?search_method=QUERY&login=guest&enlogin=guest&page_num=1&user_list=LIST&searchstr=Plato&field=hw_eng&num_per_page=25&db=REAL |title=Plato |encyclopedia=Suda <!--|others=10th century--> }}
* {{cite book |last=Popper |first=K. |year=1962 |title=The Open Society and its Enemies |volume=1 |location=London |publisher=Routledge }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Press |first=Gerald Alan |entry=Introduction |title=Who Speaks for Plato?: Studies in Platonic Anonymity |editor-last=Press |editor-first=Gerald Alan |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2000 |pages=1–14 }}
* {{cite book |last=Reale |first=Giovanni |title=Plato and Aristotle |series=A History of Ancient Philosophy |volume=2 |editor-first=John R. |editor-last=Catan |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=1990 }}
* {{cite book |last=Reale |first=Giovanni |title=Plato and Aristotle |series=A History of Ancient Philosophy |volume=2 |editor-first=John R. |editor-last=Catan |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=1990 }}
* {{cite book |first=Giovanni |last=Reale |title=Toward a New Interpretation of Plato |location=Washington, DC |publisher=CUA Press |year=1997 }}
* {{cite book |last=Riginos |first=Alice |title=Platonica : the anecdotes concerning the life and writings of Plato |publisher=E.J. Brill |location=Leiden |year=1976 |isbn=978-90-04-04565-1 }}
* {{cite book |last=Riginos |first=Alice |title=Platonica : the anecdotes concerning the life and writings of Plato |publisher=E.J. Brill |location=Leiden |year=1976 |isbn=978-90-04-04565-1 }}
* {{cite book |last=Robinson |first=John |author-link=John Robinson (historian) |title=Archæologica Græca |year=1827 |location=London |edition=Second |publisher=A. J. Valpy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P-LQzMJWs0QC |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701190339/http://books.google.com/books?id=P-LQzMJWs0QC&oe=UTF-8 |archive-date=1 July 2014 |access-date=4 February 2017 }}
* {{cite conference |conference=Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy |title=Philosophy and Dialogue: Plato's Unwritten Doctrines from a Hermeneutical Point of View |last=Rodriguez-Grandjean |first=Pablo |year=1998 |location=Boston |url=http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Anci/AnciRodr.htm |conference-url=http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Program.html }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |first=Christopher |last=Rowe |entry=Interpreting Plato |editor-first=Hugh H. |editor-last=Benson |title=A Companion to Plato |pages=13–24 |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |year=2006 }}
* {{cite journal |last=Schall |first=James V. |title=On the Death of Plato |journal=[[The American Scholar (magazine)|The American Scholar]] |url=http://www.morec.com/schall/docs/dieplato.htm |date=Summer 1996 |volume=65 |access-date=11 September 2011 |archive-date=6 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806150440/http://www.morec.com/schall/docs/dieplato.htm |url-status=dead }}
* {{cite web |last=Schofield |first=Malcolm |title=Plato |website=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/A088 |editor-last=Craig |editor-first=Edward |publisher=Routledge |date=23 August 2002 |access-date=3 April 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081010162923/http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/A088 |archive-date=10 October 2008 }}
* {{cite book |last=Sedley |first=David |title=Plato's Cratylus |year=2003 |publisher=Cambridge University Press }}
* {{cite journal |last=Slings |first=S.R. |title=Remarks on Some Recent Papyri of the ''Politeia'' |journal=Mnemosyne |series=Fourth |volume=40 |issue=1/2 |year=1987 |pages=27–34 |doi=10.1163/156852587x00030}}
* {{cite book |last=Slings |first=S.R. |title=Platonis Rempublicam |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 }}
* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=William |title=Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology |year=1870 |chapter-url=http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/2725.html |chapter=Plato |access-date=27 January 2007 |archive-date=24 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150124060246/http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/2725.html |url-status=dead }}
* {{cite book |last=Strauss |first=Leo |title=The City and the Man |location=Chicago |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1964 }}
* {{cite book |last=Strauss |first=Leo |title=The City and the Man |location=Chicago |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1964 }}
* {{cite web |last=Suzanne |first=Bernard |title=The Stephanus edition |date=8 March 2009 |access-date=3 April 2014 |url=http://plato-dialogues.org/stephanus.htm |website=Plato and his dialogues }}
* {{cite book |last=Szlezak |first=Thomas A. |title=Reading Plato |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x34szlJIRIgC |publisher=Routledge |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-415-18984-2 }}
* {{cite book |last=Tarán |first=Leonardo |title=Speusippus of Athens |publisher=Brill Publishers |year=1981 }}
* {{cite book |last=Tarán |first=Leonardo |title=Collected Papers 1962–1999 |chapter=Plato's Alleged Epitaph |year=2001 |publisher=Brill Academic Publishers |isbn=978-90-04-12304-5 }}
* {{cite book |last=Taylor |first=Alfred Edward |title=Plato: The Man and His Work |year=2001 |publisher=Courier Dover Publications |isbn=978-0-486-41605-2 |orig-year=1937}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Taylor |first=C.C.W. |entry=Plato's Epistemology |editor-last=Fine |editor-first=G. |title=The Oxford Handbook of Plato |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |pages=165–190 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Taylor |first=C.C.W. |entry=Plato's Epistemology |editor-last=Fine |editor-first=G. |title=The Oxford Handbook of Plato |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |pages=165–190 }}
* {{cite book |first=Gregory |last=Vlastos |title=Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher |url=https://archive.org/details/socratesironistm00vlas_0 |url-access=registration |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1991 }}
* {{cite book |first=Gregory |last=Vlastos |title=Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher |url=https://archive.org/details/socratesironistm00vlas_0 |url-access=registration |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1991 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Waterfield |first1=Robin |title=Plato of Athens: A Life in Philosophy |date=2023 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-756475-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QaO9EAAAQBAJ |access-date=5 May 2025 |language=en}}
* {{cite book |first=Alfred North |last=Whitehead |title=Process and Reality |url=https://archive.org/details/processrealitygi00alfr |url-access=registration |location=New York |publisher=The Free Press |year=1978 }}
* {{cite book |first=Alfred North |last=Whitehead |title=Process and Reality |url=https://archive.org/details/processrealitygi00alfr |url-access=registration |location=New York |publisher=The Free Press |year=1978 }}
* {{cite book |last=Wilamowitz-Moellendorff |first=Ulrich von |title=Plato: His Life and Work (translated in Greek by Xenophon Armyros) |year=2005 |orig-year=1917 |publisher=Kaktos |isbn=978-960-382-664-4 }}
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}
== Further reading ==
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book |last=Alican |first=Necip Fikri |title=Rethinking Plato: A Cartesian Quest for the Real Plato |publisher=Amsterdam and New York: Editions Rodopi B.V. |date=2012 |isbn=978-90-420-3537-9}}
* Allen, R. E. (1965). ''Studies in Plato's Metaphysics II''. Taylor & Francis. {{isbn|0-7100-3626-4}}
* Ambuel, David (2007). ''Image and Paradigm in Plato's Sophist''. Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-04-9}}
* {{cite book |first1=Mark |last1=Anderson |first2=Ginger |last2=Osborn |year=2009 |url=http://campus.belmont.edu/philosophy/Book.pdf |title=Approaching Plato: A Guide to the Early and Middle Dialogues |location=Nashville |publisher=Belmont University}}
* Arieti, James A. ''Interpreting Plato: The Dialogues as Drama'', Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. {{isbn|0-8476-7662-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Barrow |first=Robin |year=2007 |title=Plato: Continuum Library of Educational Thought |publisher=Continuum |isbn=978-0-8264-8408-6}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Cooper |editor-first=John M. |editor2-last=Hutchinson |editor2-first=D.S. |title=Plato: Complete Works |publisher=[[Hackett Publishing Company]], Inc |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-87220-349-5 |url=https://archive.org/details/completeworks00plat}}
* Corlett, J. Angelo (2005). ''Interpreting Plato's Dialogues''. Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-02-5}}
* {{cite book |author-link=G. C. Field |last=Field |first=G.C. |title=The Philosophy of Plato |edition=2nd ed. with an appendix by Cross, R.C. |location=London |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1969 |isbn=978-0-19-888040-0}}
* Fine, Gail (2000). ''Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology'' Oxford University Press, US, {{isbn|0-19-875206-7}}
* Finley, M.I. (1969). ''Aspects of antiquity: Discoveries and Controversies'' The Viking Press, Inc., US
* {{cite book |last=Garvey |first=James |title=Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books |url=https://archive.org/details/twentygreatestph00garv |url-access=registration |publisher=Continuum |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-8264-9053-7}}
* [[W. K. C. Guthrie|Guthrie, W.K.C.]] (1986). ''A History of Greek Philosophy (Plato&nbsp;– The Man & His Dialogues&nbsp;– Earlier Period)'', Cambridge University Press, {{isbn|0-521-31101-2}}
* [[W. K. C. Guthrie|Guthrie, W.K.C.]] (1986). ''A History of Greek Philosophy (Later Plato & the Academy)'' Cambridge University Press, {{isbn|0-521-31102-0}}
* Havelock, Eric (2005). ''Preface to Plato (History of the Greek Mind)'', Belknap Press, {{isbn|0-674-69906-8}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Hamilton |editor-first=Edith |editor2-last=Cairns |editor2-first=Huntington |title=The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters |publisher=Princeton Univ. Press |year=1961 |isbn=978-0-691-09718-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/collecteddialogu00tred}}
* [[Harvard University Press]] publishes the hardbound series ''[[Loeb Classical Library#Plato|Loeb Classical Library]]'', containing Plato's works in [[Greek language|Greek]], with English translations on facing pages.
* {{cite book |title=Socrates on Trial: A play based on Aristophanes' Clouds and Plato's Apology, Crito, and Phaedo, adapted for modern performance |last=Irvine |first=Andrew David |year=2008 |publisher=University of Toronto Press |location=Toronto|title-link=Socrates on Trial (play)}} {{isbn|978-0-8020-9783-5|978-0-8020-9538-1}}
* Hermann, Arnold (2010). ''Plato's Parmenides: Text, Translation & Introductory Essay'', Parmenides Publishing, {{isbn|978-1-930972-71-1}}
* Irwin, Terence (1995). ''Plato's Ethics'', Oxford University Press, US, {{isbn|0-19-508645-7}}
* {{cite book |last=Jackson |first=Roy |title=Plato: A Beginner's Guide |location=London |publisher=Hoder & Stroughton |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-340-80385-1}}
* {{cite book |last=Kochin |first=Michael S. |title=Gender and Rhetoric in Plato's Political Thought |publisher=Cambridge Univ. Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-521-80852-1}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Kraut |editor-first=Richard |title=The Cambridge Companion to Plato |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780521436106 |url-access=registration |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-521-43610-6}}
* {{cite book | author=LeMoine, Rebecca | title=Plato's Caves: The Liberating Sting of Cultural Diversity | location=New York | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=2020 | isbn=978-0190936983}}
* [[Suzanne Lilar|Lilar, Suzanne]] (1954), Journal de l'analogiste, Paris, Éditions Julliard; Reedited 1979, Paris, Grasset. Foreword by [[Julien Gracq]]
* [[Suzanne Lilar|Lilar, Suzanne]] (1963), ''Le couple'', Paris, Grasset. Translated as ''Aspects of Love in Western Society'' in 1965, with a foreword by Jonathan Griffin London, Thames and Hudson.
* [[Suzanne Lilar|Lilar, Suzanne]] (1967) ''A propos de Sartre et de l'amour '', Paris, Grasset.
* {{cite book |last=Lundberg |first=Phillip |title=Tallyho – The Hunt for Virtue: Beauty, Truth and Goodness Nine Dialogues by Plato: Pheadrus, Lysis, Protagoras, Charmides, Parmenides, Gorgias, Theaetetus, Meno & Sophist |publisher=Authorhouse |year=2005 |isbn=978-1-4184-4977-3}}
* Márquez, Xavier (2012) ''A Stranger's Knowledge: Statesmanship, Philosophy & Law in Plato's Statesman'', Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-79-7}}
* {{cite book |last=Melchert |first=Norman |title=The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy |url=https://archive.org/details/greatconversatio00norm |url-access=registration |publisher=McGraw Hill |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-19-517510-3}}
* Miller, Mitchell (2004). ''The Philosopher in Plato's Statesman''. Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-16-2}}
* Mohr, Richard D. (2006). ''God and Forms in Plato – and other Essays in Plato's Metaphysics''. Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-01-8}}
* Mohr, Richard D. (Ed.), Sattler, Barbara M. (Ed.) (2010) ''One Book, The Whole Universe: Plato's Timaeus Today'', Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-32-2}}
* Moore, Edward (2007). ''Plato''. Philosophy Insights Series. Tirril, Humanities-Ebooks. {{isbn|978-1-84760-047-9}}
* Nightingale, Andrea Wilson. (1995). [https://books.google.com/books?id=n3MeQikAp00C "Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy"], Cambridge University Press. {{isbn|0-521-48264-X}}
* [[Oxford University Press]] publishes scholarly editions of Plato's Greek texts in the ''[[Oxford Classical Texts]]'' series, and some translations in the ''Clarendon Plato Series''.
* Patterson, Richard (Ed.), Karasmanis, Vassilis (Ed.), Hermann, Arnold (Ed.) (2013) ''Presocratics & Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in Honor of Charles Kahn'', Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-75-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Piechowiak |first=Marek |title=Plato's Conception of Justice and the Question of Human Dignity |publisher=Peter Lang: Berlin |year=2019 |isbn=978-3-631-65970-0 }}
* {{cite book |last=Sallis |first=John |title=Being and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-253-21071-5 |author-link=John Sallis}}
* {{cite book |last=Sallis |first=John |title=Chorology: On Beginning in Plato's "Timaeus" |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-253-21308-2 |author-link=John Sallis}}
* Sayre, Kenneth M. (2005). ''Plato's Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved''. Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-09-4}}
* [[T. K. Seung|Seung, T.K.]] (1996). ''Plato Rediscovered: Human Value and Social Order''. Rowman and Littlefield. {{isbn|0-8476-8112-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Smith |first=William. |title=Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology |publisher=University of Michigan/Online version |year=1867}}
* Stewart, John. (2010). ''Kierkegaard and the Greek World&nbsp;– Socrates and Plato''. Ashgate. {{isbn|978-0-7546-6981-4}}
* Thesleff, Holger (2009). ''Platonic Patterns: A Collection of Studies by Holger Thesleff'', Parmenides Publishing, {{isbn|978-1-930972-29-2}}
* [[Gregory Vlastos|Vlastos, Gregory]] (1981). ''Platonic Studies'', Princeton University Press, {{isbn|0-691-10021-7}}
* [[Gregory Vlastos|Vlastos, Gregory]] (2006). ''Plato's Universe&nbsp;– with a new Introduction by [[Luc Brisson]]'', Parmenides Publishing. {{isbn|978-1-930972-13-1}}
* Zuckert, Catherine (2009). ''Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues'', The University of Chicago Press, {{isbn|978-0-226-99335-5}}
{{refend}}


== External links ==
== External links ==
{{sister project links|d=Q859|n=no|c=Category:Plato|s=Author:Plato|v=Socrates, Plato and Aristotle}}
{{Library resources box |by=yes |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Plato |viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }}
{{Library resources box |by=yes |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Plato |viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }}
{{Portal|Philosophy}}
{{Portal|Philosophy}}
{{sister project links|d=Q859|n=no|c=Category:Plato|s=Author:Plato|v=Socrates, Plato and Aristotle}}
* {{wikisourcelang-inline|el|Πλάτων|Platon}}
*{{wikisourcelang-inline|el|Πλάτων|Platon}}
* Works available online:
* Works available online:
** {{StandardEbooks|Standard Ebooks URL=https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/plato}}
** {{StandardEbooks|Standard Ebooks URL=https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/plato}}
Line 367: Line 265:
** {{Internet Archive author}}
** {{Internet Archive author}}
** {{Librivox author |id=599}}
** {{Librivox author |id=599}}
* ''[http://www.iep.utm.edu/plato/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]''
* ''[https://www.iep.utm.edu/plato/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]''
* ''[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]''
* ''[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]''
* Other resources:
* Other resources:
Line 382: Line 280:
{{Metaphysics}}
{{Metaphysics}}
{{Ethics}}
{{Ethics}}
{{Social and political philosophy}}
{{Political philosophy}}
}}
}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
[[Category:Plato| ]]
[[Category:Plato| ]]
[[Category:Platonism|Plato]]
[[Category:420s BC births]]
[[Category:420s BC births]]
[[Category:340s BC deaths]]
[[Category:340s BC deaths]]
[[Category:5th-century BC Greek people]]
[[Category:5th-century BC Greek philosophers]]
[[Category:5th-century BC writers]]
[[Category:4th-century BC Greek philosophers]]
[[Category:4th-century BC Greek philosophers]]
[[Category:4th-century BC philosophers]]
[[Category:4th-century BC writers]]
[[Category:Academic philosophers]]
[[Category:Academic philosophers]]
[[Category:Ancient Athenian philosophers]]
[[Category:Ancient Athenian philosophers]]
Line 405: Line 300:
[[Category:Ancient Greek philosophers of art]]
[[Category:Ancient Greek philosophers of art]]
[[Category:Ancient Greek philosophers of language]]
[[Category:Ancient Greek philosophers of language]]
[[Category:Ancient Greek slaves and freedmen]]
[[Category:Ancient Syracuse]]
[[Category:Ancient Syracuse]]
[[Category:Attic Greek writers]]
[[Category:Attic Greek writers]]
[[Category:Characters in the Divine Comedy]]
[[Category:Epigrammatists of the Greek Anthology]]
[[Category:Epigrammatists of the Greek Anthology]]
[[Category:Idealists]]
[[Category:Idealists]]
[[Category:Logicians]]
[[Category:Moral realists]]
[[Category:Natural law ethicists]]
[[Category:Natural philosophers]]
[[Category:Ontologists]]
[[Category:Philosophers of death]]
[[Category:Philosophers of education]]
[[Category:Philosophers of education]]
[[Category:Philosophers of love]]
[[Category:Pupils of Socrates]]
[[Category:Pupils of Socrates]]
[[Category:Rationalists]]
[[Category:Rationalists]]
[[Category:Theorists on Western civilization]]
[[Category:Rhetoric theorists]]

Latest revision as of 20:06, 4 March 2026


Plato
Roman copy of a portrait bust c. 370 BC
Born428/427 or 424/423 BC
Died348/347 BC (aged 75-80)
Athens
Notable work
EraAncient Greek philosophy
Notable studentsAristotle
Main interests
Epistemology, Metaphysics
Political philosophy, Ethics
Notable ideas

Plato (/ˈplt/ PLAY-toe; Greek: Πλάτων, Template:Tlit; born c. 428–423 BC, died 348/347 BC) was an ancient Greek philosopher of Classical Athens who is most commonly considered the foundational thinker of the Western philosophical tradition.[1] An innovator of the literary dialogue and dialectic forms, Plato influenced all the major areas of theoretical philosophy and practical philosophy, and was the founder of the Academy, a philosophical school in Athens where Plato taught the collection of philosophical theories that would later become known as Platonism.

Plato's most famous contribution is his Theory of Forms (or Ideas), which aims to solve what is now known as the problem of universals. He was influenced by the pre-Socratic thinkers Pythagoras, Heraclitus, and Parmenides, although much of what is known about them is derived from Plato himself.

Along with his teacher Socrates, and his student Aristotle, Plato is a central figure in the history of Western philosophy. Plato's complete works are believed to have survived for over 2,400 years—unlike that of nearly all of his contemporaries.[2] Although their popularity has fluctuated, they have consistently been read and studied through the ages.[3] Through Platonism's outgrowth Neoplatonism, he also influenced Christian philosophy, and both Jewish and Islamic philosophy. In modern times, Alfred North Whitehead said: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato."[4]

Life[edit | edit source]

Plato was born between 428 and 423 BC[5][6] into an aristocratic and influential Athenian family;[7] through his mother, Perictione, he was a descendant of Solon, a statesman credited with laying the foundations of Athenian democracy.[8] Diogenes Laertius asserts that Plato is a nickname that alludes to his robust figure,[9] and that his birth name was Aristocles (Ἀριστοκλῆς), meaning 'best reputation', but this is widely regarded as false by modern scholarship.[10][11][12][6] Plato had two brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, both of whom appear in the Republic, and also a sister, Potone, and a half brother, Antiphon.[6]

During Plato's childhood, Athens was involved in the Peloponnesian War against Sparta. His older brothers, Adeimantus and Glaucon, distinguished themselves at the battle of Megara in 409 BC.[13] Despite the war, Plato and his brothers, like all male citizens of Athens, received a traditional education in gymnastics and music.[14] According to the ancient writers, there was a tradition that Plato's favorite employment in his youthful years was poetry: he wrote poems, dithyrambs at first, and afterwards lyric poems and tragedies (a tetralogy), but abandoned his early passion and burnt his poems when he met Socrates and turned to philosophy.[15] There are also some epigrams attributed to Plato, but these are now thought by some scholars to be spurious.[16]

Socrates[edit | edit source]

Plato was one of the devoted young followers of Socrates, whose bust is pictured above.

In his youth, Plato first encountered Socrates, who would become his teacher and greatest source of inspiration, initially in the company of other Athenian boys in the Palaestra, such as is depicted with Lysis and Menexenus, who discuss philosophy with Socrates in the Lysis,[17] but he soon would become a member of Socrates' inner circle, meeting with Socrates and his other followers. Socrates, along with the sophists of his day, challenged the prevailing focus of Early Greek philosophy on Natural philosophy, and investigated questions of ethics and politics, examining the ideas of his interlocutors with a series of questioning called the Socratic method.[18]

Socrates' immense influence on Plato is clearly borne out in Plato's dialogues: Plato never speaks in his own voice in his dialogues; every dialogue except the Laws features Socrates, although many dialogues, including the Timaeus and Statesman, feature him speaking only rarely. Leo Strauss notes that Socrates' reputation for irony casts doubt on whether Plato's Socrates is expressing sincere beliefs.[19] Xenophon's Memorabilia and Aristophanes's The Clouds seem to present a somewhat different portrait of Socrates from the one Plato paints. Aristotle attributes a different doctrine with respect to Forms to Plato and Socrates.[20] Aristotle suggests that Socrates' idea of forms can be discovered through investigation of the natural world, unlike Plato's Forms that exist beyond and outside the ordinary range of human understanding.[21] The Socratic problem concerns how to reconcile these various accounts. The precise relationship between Plato and Socrates remains an area of contention among scholars.[22][page needed]

Thirty tyrants and Trial of Socrates[edit | edit source]

According to the Seventh Letter, whose authenticity has been disputed, as Plato came of age, he imagined for himself a life in public affairs.[23] In 404, Sparta defeated Athens at the conclusion of the Peloponessian war, leading to the election of the Thirty Tyrants, which included two of Plato's relatives, Critias and Charmides.[24] Plato himself was invited to join the administration, but declined, and quickly became disillusioned by the atrocities committed by the Thirty, especially when they tried to implicate Socrates in their seizure of the democratic general Leon of Salamis for summary execution.[25]

In 403 BC, the democracy was restored after the regrouping of the democrats in exile, who entered the city through the Piraeus and met the forces of the Thirty at the Battle of Munychia, where both Critias and Charmides were killed. In 401 BC the restored democrats raided Eleusis and killed the remaining oligarchic supporters, suspecting them of hiring mercenaries.[26]

As depicted in the many dialogues that are set between 401 and 399 BC, life largely returned to normal in Athens. However, the prosecution of Socrates by Anytus put an end to Plato's plans for a political career.[27]

Later philosophical development[edit | edit source]

After the death of Socrates, Plato remained in Athens for roughly three years.[28]

Heraclitus and Parmenides[edit | edit source]

Heraclitus (1628) by Hendrick ter Brugghen. Heraclitus saw a world in flux, with everything always in conflict, constantly changing.
Bust of Parmenides from Velia. Parmenides saw the world as eternal and unchanging, that all change was an illusion.

In Athens, Plato studied with Cratylus, a philosopher who followed the early Greek philosopher Heraclitus, and also Hermogenes, an Eleatic philosopher in the tradition of Parmenides.[29] Heraclitus viewed all things as continuously changing, that one cannot "step into the same river twice" due to the ever-changing waters flowing through it, and all things exist as a contraposition of opposites, while Parmenides adopted an altogether contrary vision, arguing for the idea of a changeless, eternal universe and the view that change is an illusion. Heraclitus's views are expounded by Cratylus himself in Plato's dialogue Cratylus and deconstructed in the Theaetetus by Socrates. Plato would go on to depict both Parmenides and Parmenides' student Zeno in the Parmenides, and an "Eleatic Stranger" also appears in the Sophist and Statesman.

In roughly 396 BC, Plato left Athens and studied in Megara with Euclid of Megara, founder of the Megarian school of philosophy, and other Socratics.[30]

Mathematics[edit | edit source]

Around 394 BC or earlier, he returned to Athens, where, as an Athenian male of military age he would have needed to be available to serve in the Corinthian war, which Athens participated in from 395 to 386 BC.[31] Other than potential military service, Plato spent his time studying mathematics with Archytas of Tarentum, Theaetetus, Leodamas of Thasos, and Neocleides in the grove of Hecademus,[32] named after an Attic hero in Greek mythology, northwest of the city of Athens, where he would later found his Academy.[6] During this time, Plato likely began work on some of his earliest works; including the Apology, possibly early drafts of the Gorgias and Republic Book I, and an early form of the Republic books II-IV, in the form of a speech rather than a dialogue, which was ridiculed by Aristophanes in the Ecclesiazusae in 391 BC.[33] Speusippus, the son of Plato's sister Potone, who took over the academy after Plato's death, joined the group in about 390 BC, and Eudoxus of Cnidus, another early mathematician, arrived around 385 BC.[32]

Pythagoreanism[edit | edit source]

The mathematical and mystical teachings of the followers of Pythagoras, pictured above, exerted a strong influence on Plato.

After the conclusion of the Corinthian War, Plato travelled to southern Italy to study with Archytas and other Pythagoreans.[34] The influence of these Pythagoreans appears to have been significant. According to R. M. Hare, this influence consists of three points:

  1. The platonic Republic might be related to the idea of "a tightly organized community of like-minded thinkers", like the one established by Pythagoras in Croton.
  2. The idea that mathematics and, generally speaking, abstract thinking is a secure basis for philosophical thinking as well as "for substantial theses in science and morals".
  3. They shared a "mystical approach to the soul and its place in the material world".[35]

Pythagoras held that all things are number, and the cosmos comes from numerical principles. He introduced the concept of form as distinct from matter, and that the physical world is an imitation of an eternal mathematical world.[36]

Later years: Syracuse and the Academy[edit | edit source]

First trip to Syracuse[edit | edit source]

When Plato was about 40 years old, he visited Syracuse. Many ancient sources, including the collection of Letters attributed to Plato, tell how he became entangled with the politics of the city of Syracuse. Plato initially visited Syracuse while it was under the rule of Dionysius, in roughly 385 BC.[37] During this first trip Dionysius's brother-in-law, Dion of Syracuse, became one of Plato's disciples, but the tyrant himself turned against Plato.[6]

Foundation of the Academy[edit | edit source]

Plato's Academy mosaic in the villa of T. Siminius Stephanus in Pompeii, around 100 BC to 100 CE

After his return from Syracuse, Plato founded his philosophical school, the Academy, near the sacred olive grove of Hecademus, in roughly 383 BC.[29] At first, the property consisted of only a house with a garden, and during his lifetime, the work of the Academy itself likely took part in an open area for study of philosophy and mathematics.[29] From 383 BC until about 366 BC, Plato primarily spent his time at the Academy, writing the majority of the dialogues during this time.[38] Much like Socrates and his students had been parodied in Aristophanes' plays The Clouds and The Birds, the students at the Academy seem to have been the target of their contemporaries in Middle Comedy.[29] A fragment from a lost play of Epicrates depicts two students of the Academy engaged in a fierce debate over the genus of a pumpkin, in a parody of the Platonic conception of diairesis.[29] Aristotle of Stagira, who would go on to become a philosopher as famous as Plato in his own right,[39] arrived in 367 BC, shortly before Plato departed again for Syracuse.[40]

Second and third trips to Syracuse[edit | edit source]

After Dionysius I's death in 367 BC, Plato returned to Syracuse, likely early in 366 BC, at the request of Dion, in order to tutor Dionysius II and guide him to become a philosopher king. Dionysius II seemed to accept Plato's teachings, but he became suspicious of Dion, his uncle. Dionysius expelled Dion, and Plato, after trying repeatedly to reconcile the two, gave up and returned to Athens.[29]

Plato returned to Syracuse a third time in 361 BC, likely staying over the winter until 360 BC.[29] Dionysius kept Plato against his will, forcing Plato to appeal to his friend Archytas to intercede, at which point he returned to Athens.[29] Dion would return to overthrow Dionysius and ruled Syracuse for a short time from 357 BC up until 354 BC,[29] when he was usurped by Calippus, an Athenian who Plato insists, in the Seventh Letter, had no connection with the Academy.[41]

Final years and death[edit | edit source]

After 360 BC, Plato returned to Athens, where he spent the remainder of his life.[6]

At this point, he wrote or revised some of his final works, possibly including the Timaeus, Critias, Sophist, Statesman, Philebus, and his longest work, the Laws, all of which exhibit similarity of language, philosophical themes, and style that indicate they were intentionally published together to present a unified viewpoint.[42] At the time of his death, however, the Laws was still unfinished; this work was edited by a student at the Academy, Philip of Opus, who is also generally believed to have written the Epinomis, an appendix to the Laws.[43]

In 348/347 BC, Plato died and was buried in his garden in the Academy in Athens.[44] At the time of his death, Plato seems to have been self-sufficient, but not wealthy.[45] A will preserved by one of the ancient biographers of Plato, which discusses his estate, does not mention the Academy, which suggests that he left a separate provision for it or possibly established an endowment.[45] He was succeeded as the head of the Academy by Speusippus, his nephew.[43]

Philosophy[edit | edit source]

Template:Platonism In Plato's dialogues, Socrates and his company of disputants had something to say on many subjects, including several aspects of metaphysics. These include religion and science, human nature, love, and sexuality. More than one dialogue contrasts perception and reality, nature and custom, and body and soul. Francis Cornford identified the "twin pillars of Platonism" as the theory of Forms, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the doctrine of immortality of the soul.[46]

The Forms[edit | edit source]

In the dialogues Socrates regularly asks for the meaning of a general term (e. g. justice, truth, beauty), and criticizes those who instead give him particular examples, rather than the quality shared by all examples. "Platonism" and its theory of Forms (also known as 'theory of Ideas') denies the reality of the material world, considering it only an image or copy of the real world. According to this theory of Forms, there are these two kinds of things: the apparent world of material objects grasped by the senses, which constantly changes,[47] and an unchanging and unseen world of Forms, grasped by reason. Plato's Forms represent types of things, as well as properties, patterns, and relations, which are referred to as objects. Just as individual tables, chairs, and cars refer to objects in this world, 'tableness', 'chairness', and 'carness', as well as e.g. justice, truth, and beauty refer to objects in another world. One of Plato's most cited examples for the Forms were the truths of geometry, such as the Pythagorean theorem. The theory of Forms is first introduced in the Phaedo dialogue (also known as On the Soul), wherein Socrates disputes the pluralism of Anaxagoras, then the most popular response to Heraclitus and Parmenides.

The Soul[edit | edit source]

For Plato, as was characteristic of ancient Greek philosophy, the soul was that which gave life. Plato advocates a belief in the immortality of the soul, and several dialogues end with long speeches imagining the afterlife. In the Republic (IV), the soul consists of three parts, which are located in different regions of the body.[48] Also in the Timaeus, Socrates locates the parts of the soul within the human body: Reason is located in the head, spirit in the top third of the torso, and the appetite in the middle third of the torso, down to the navel.[49]

Furthermore, Plato evinces a belief in the theory of reincarnation in multiple dialogues (such as the Phaedo and Timaeus). Scholars debate whether he intends the theory to be literally true, however.[50] He uses this idea of reincarnation to introduce the concept that knowledge is a matter of recollection of things acquainted with before one is born, and not of observation or study.[51] Keeping with the theme of admitting his own ignorance, Socrates regularly complains of his forgetfulness. In the Meno, Socrates uses a geometrical example to expound Plato's view that knowledge in this latter sense is acquired by recollection. Socrates elicits a fact concerning a geometrical construction from a slave boy, who could not have otherwise known the fact (due to the slave boy's lack of education). The knowledge must be of, Socrates concludes, an eternal, non-perceptible Form.

Epistemology[edit | edit source]

Plato also discusses several aspects of epistemology. In several dialogues, Socrates inverts the common man's intuition about what is knowable and what is real. Reality is unavailable to those who use their senses. Socrates says that he who sees with his eyes is blind. While most people take the objects of their senses to be real if anything is, Socrates is contemptuous of people who think that something has to be graspable in the hands to be real. In other words, such people are willingly ignorant, living without divine inspiration and access to higher insights about reality. Although Plato has occasionally been presented as having been the first to write that knowledge is justified true belief in the Theaetetus,[52] Plato also identified problems with this same justified true belief definition in that same work, concluding that justification (or an "account") would require knowledge of difference, meaning that the definition of knowledge is circular.[53]

In the Sophist, Statesman, Republic, Timaeus, and the Parmenides, Plato associates knowledge with the apprehension of unchanging Forms and their relationships to one another (which he calls "expertise" in dialectic), including through the processes of collection and division.[54] More explicitly, Plato himself argues in the Timaeus that knowledge is always proportionate to the realm from which it is gained. In other words, if one derives one's account of something experientially, because the world of sense is in flux, the views therein attained will be mere opinions. Meanwhile, opinions are characterized by a lack of necessity and stability. On the other hand, if one derives one's account of something by way of the non-sensible Forms, because these Forms are unchanging, so too is the account derived from them. That apprehension of Forms is required for knowledge may be taken to cohere with Plato's theory in the Theaetetus and Meno.[55] Indeed, the apprehension of Forms may be at the base of the account required for justification, in that it offers foundational knowledge which itself needs no account, thereby avoiding an infinite regression.[56]

"What is justice?" forms one of the core quandaries of the Republic.

Ethics[edit | edit source]

Several dialogues discuss ethics including virtue and vice, pleasure and pain, crime and punishment, and justice and medicine. Socrates presents the famous Euthyphro dilemma in the dialogue of the same name: "Is the pious (τὸ ὅσιον) loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (10a) In the Protagoras dialogue it is argued through Socrates that virtue is innate and cannot be learned, that no one does bad on purpose, and to know what is good results in doing what is good; that knowledge is virtue. In the Republic, Plato poses the question, "What is justice?" and by examining both individual justice and the justice that informs societies, Plato is able not only to inform metaphysics, but also ethics and politics with the question: "What is the basis of moral and social obligation?" Plato's well-known answer rests upon the fundamental responsibility to seek wisdom, wisdom which leads to an understanding of the Form of the Good. Plato views "The Good" as the supreme Form, somehow existing even "beyond being". In this manner, justice is obtained when knowledge of how to fulfill one's moral and political function in society is put into practice.

Politics[edit | edit source]

Papyrus from Oxyrhynchus, with fragment of Plato's Republic

The dialogues also discuss politics. Some of Plato's most famous doctrines are contained in the Republic as well as in the Laws and the Statesman. Because these opinions are not spoken directly by Plato and vary between dialogues, they cannot be straightforwardly assumed as representing Plato's own views.

Socrates asserts that societies have a tripartite class structure corresponding to the appetite/spirit/reason structure of the individual soul. The appetite/spirit/reason are analogous to the castes of society.[57]

  • Productive (Workers) – the labourers, carpenters, plumbers, masons, merchants, farmers, ranchers, etc. These correspond to the "appetite" part of the soul.
  • Protective (Warriors or Guardians) – those who are adventurous, strong and brave; in the armed forces. These correspond to the "spirit" part of the soul.
  • Governing (Rulers or Philosopher Kings) – those who are intelligent, rational, self-controlled, in love with wisdom, well suited to make decisions for the community. These correspond to the "reason" part of the soul and are very few.

According to Socrates, a state made up of different kinds of souls will, overall, decline from an aristocracy (rule by the best) to a timocracy (rule by the honourable), then to an oligarchy (rule by the few), then to a democracy (rule by the people), and finally to tyranny (rule by one person, rule by a tyrant).[58]

Rhetoric and poetry[edit | edit source]

Several dialogues tackle questions about art, including rhetoric and rhapsody. Socrates says that poetry is inspired by the muses, and is not rational. He speaks approvingly of this, and other forms of divine madness (drunkenness, eroticism, and dreaming) in the Phaedrus,[59] and yet in the Republic wants to outlaw Homer's great poetry, and laughter as well. Scholars often view Plato's philosophy as at odds with rhetoric due to his criticisms of rhetoric in the Gorgias and his ambivalence toward rhetoric expressed in the Phaedrus. But other contemporary researchers contest the idea that Plato despised rhetoric and instead view his dialogues as a dramatization of complex rhetorical principles.[60] Plato made abundant use of mythological narratives in his own work; it is generally agreed that the main purpose for Plato in using myths was didactic.[61] He considered that only a few people were capable or interested in following a reasoned philosophical discourse, but men in general are attracted by stories and tales. Consequently, then, he used the myth to convey the conclusions of the philosophical reasoning.[62] Notable examples include the story of Atlantis, the Myth of Er, and the Allegory of the Cave.

Unwritten doctrines[edit | edit source]

Plato's unwritten doctrines are,[63] according to some ancient sources, the most fundamental metaphysical teaching of Plato, which he disclosed only orally, and some say only to his most trusted fellows, and which he may have kept secret from the public, although some scholars doubt these claims.[64] It is, however, said that Plato once disclosed this knowledge to the public in his lecture On the Good (Περὶ τἀγαθοῦ), in which the Good (τὸ ἀγαθόν) is identified with the One (the Unity, τὸ ἕν), the fundamental ontological principle. The most important aspect of this interpretation of Plato's metaphysics is the continuity between his teaching and the Neoplatonic interpretation of Plotinus. All the sources related to the ἄγραφα δόγματα have been collected by Konrad Gaiser and published as Testimonia Platonica.[65]

Works[edit | edit source]

Themes[edit | edit source]

Painting of a scene from Plato's Symposium (Anselm Feuerbach, 1873)

Plato never presents himself as a participant in any of the dialogues, and with the exception of the Apology, there is no suggestion that he heard any of the dialogues firsthand. Some dialogues have no narrator but have a pure "dramatic" form, some dialogues are narrated by Socrates himself, who speaks in the first person. The Symposium is narrated by Apollodorus, a Socratic disciple, apparently to Glaucon. Apollodorus assures his listener that he is recounting the story, which took place when he himself was an infant, not from his own memory, but as remembered by Aristodemus, who told him the story years ago. In most of the dialogues, the primary speaker is Socrates, who employs a method of questioning which proceeds by a dialogue form.

Textual sources and history[edit | edit source]

Volume 3, pp. 32–33, of the 1578 Stephanus edition of Plato, showing a passage of Timaeus with the Latin translation and notes of Jean de Serres

During the early Renaissance, the Greek language and, along with it, Plato's texts were reintroduced to Western Europe by Byzantine scholars. Some 250 known Byzantine manuscripts of Plato survive.[66] In September or October 1484 Filippo Valori and Francesco Berlinghieri printed 1025 copies of Ficino's translation.[67] The 1578 edition of Plato's complete works published by Henricus Stephanus (Henri Estienne) in Geneva also included parallel Latin translation and running commentary by Joannes Serranus (Jean de Serres). It was this edition which established standard Stephanus pagination, still in use today. The text of Plato as received today apparently represents the complete written philosophical work of Plato, based on the first century AD arrangement of Thrasyllus of Mendes.[68] Since the beginning of the 20th century, many papyri from the Hellenistic period through the third century AD containing text from Plato's dialogues have also been recovered from Egypt, which provide important early witnesses to the text.[66] The modern standard complete English edition is the 1997 Hackett Plato: Complete Works, edited by John M. Cooper.[69][70]

Authenticity[edit | edit source]

Thirty-five dialogues and thirteen letters (the Epistles) have traditionally been ascribed to Plato, though modern scholarship doubts the authenticity of at least some of these. There is a broad consensus among scholars to doubt the authenticity of Alcibiades II, Epinomis, Hipparchus, Minos, Lovers, and Theages, while opinions on Alcibiades I, Clitophon, Letters, and Menexenus are more divided.[71] The following works were transmitted under Plato's name in antiquity, but were already considered spurious by the 1st century AD: Axiochus, Definitions, Demodocus, Epigrams, Eryxias, Halcyon, On Justice, On Virtue, Sisyphus.[69]

Chronology[edit | edit source]

No one knows the exact order Plato's dialogues were written in, nor the extent to which some might have been later revised and rewritten. The works are usually grouped into Early, Middle, and Late period; The following represents one relatively common division amongst developmentalist scholars.[72]

Whereas those classified as "early dialogues" often conclude in aporia, the so-called "middle dialogues" provide more clearly stated positive teachings that are often ascribed to Plato such as the theory of Forms. The remaining dialogues are classified as "late" and are generally agreed to be difficult and challenging pieces of philosophy.[73] It should, however, be kept in mind that many of the positions in the ordering are still highly disputed, and also that the very notion that Plato's dialogues can or should be "ordered" is by no means universally accepted.[69] In the most recent Plato scholarship, writers are increasingly skeptical of the notion that the order of Plato's writings can be established with any precision,[74] though Plato's works are still often characterized as falling at least roughly into three groups stylistically.

Legacy[edit | edit source]

Medieval era[edit | edit source]

During the Islamic Golden ages, Neoplatonism was revived from its founding father, Plotinus.[75] Neoplatonism, a philosophical current that permeated Islamic scholarship, accentuated one facet of the Qur’anic conception of God—the transcendent—while seemingly neglecting another—the creative. This philosophical tradition, introduced by Al-Farabi and subsequently elaborated upon by figures such as Avicenna, postulated that all phenomena emanated from the divine source.[76] It functioned as a conduit, bridging the transcendental nature of the divine with the tangible reality of creation. In the Islamic context, Neoplatonism facilitated the integration of Platonic philosophy with mystical Islamic thought, fostering a synthesis of ancient philosophical wisdom and religious insight.[76] Inspired by Plato's Republic, Al-Farabi extended his inquiry beyond mere political theory, proposing an ideal city governed by philosopher-kings.[77] Plato is also referenced by Jewish philosopher and Talmudic scholar Maimonides in his Guide for the Perplexed.

The School of Athens fresco features Plato (left), holding his Timaeus while he gestures to the heavens. Aristotle (right) gestures to the earth while holding a copy of Nicomachean Ethics.

Many of these commentaries on Plato were translated from Arabic into Latin, in which form they influenced medieval scholastics.[78][79] Plato's thought is often compared with that of his most famous student, Aristotle, whose reputation during the Western Middle Ages so completely eclipsed that of Plato that the Scholastic philosophers referred to Aristotle as "the Philosopher". The only Platonic work known to western scholarship was Timaeus, until translations into Latin were made beginning in the 12th century. However, the study of Plato continued in the Byzantine Empire, the Caliphates during the Islamic Golden Age, and Spain during the Golden age of Jewish culture.

Modern[edit | edit source]

During the Renaissance, Gemistos Plethon brought Plato's original writings to Florence from Constantinople in the century of its fall. Many of the greatest early modern scientists and artists who broke with Scholasticism, with the support of the Plato-inspired Lorenzo (grandson of Cosimo), saw Plato's philosophy as the basis for progress in the arts and sciences. The 17th century Cambridge Platonists sought to reconcile Plato's more problematic beliefs, such as metempsychosis and polyamory, with Christianity.[80] By the 19th century, Plato's reputation was restored, and at least on par with Aristotle's. Plato's influence has been especially strong in mathematics and the sciences. Plato's resurgence further inspired some of the greatest advances in logic since Aristotle, primarily through Gottlob Frege. Albert Einstein suggested that the scientist who takes philosophy seriously would have to avoid systematization and take on many different roles, and possibly appear as a Platonist or Pythagorean, in that such a one would have "the viewpoint of logical simplicity as an indispensable and effective tool of his research."[81] British philosopher Alfred North Whitehead said: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato."[4][82] Adapting examples from Plato's Theaetetus, Edmund Gettier famously demonstrated the Gettier problem for the "justified true belief account" of knowledge, challenging the prevalent notion in Analytic philosophy at the time that had been popularized by A. J. Ayer.[83]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. "Socrates (469—399 B.C.E.)". Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved 27 August 2024.
  2. Cooper 1997, introduction.
  3. Cooper 1997, p. vii.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Whitehead 1978, p. 39.
  5. Nails 2002, p. 246.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Waterfield 2023.
  7. Nails 2002, p. 53.
  8. Stanton, G. R. Athenian Politics c. 800–500 BC: A Sourcebook, Routledge, London (1990), p. 76.
  9. Diogenes Laërtius. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Book III. Book III, paragraph 4. he received the name of Plato on account of his robust figure, in place of his original name which was Aristocles, after his grandfather
  10. Notopoulos 1939, pp. 135–145.
  11. Nails 2002, p. 243.
  12. Guthrie 1986, p. 12 (footnote).
  13. Nails 2006, p. 2.
  14. Waterfield 2023, pp. 14-19.
  15. Waterfield 2023, pp. 20-21.
  16. Waterfield 2023, pp. 21-24.
  17. Nails 2002, p. 2.
  18. Waterfield 2023, pp. 40-42.
  19. Strauss 1964, pp. 50–51.
  20. Metaphysics 987b1–11
  21. McPherran, M.L. (1998). The Religion of Socrates. Penn State Press. p. 268.
  22. Vlastos 1991.
  23. Plato (?), Seventh Letter, 324c
  24. Nails 2006, p. 2-3.
  25. Waterfield 2023, p. 65-66.
  26. Nails 2006, p. 4.
  27. Waterfield 2023, p. 66.
  28. Waterfield 2023, p. 71.
  29. 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.4 29.5 29.6 29.7 29.8 Nails 2002, p. 248.
  30. Waterfield 2023, p. 72.
  31. Waterfield 2023, p. 73.
  32. 32.0 32.1 Nails 2006, pp. 5-6.
  33. Nails 2006, p. 6.
  34. Waterfield 2023, p. 112.
  35. R.M. Hare, Plato in C.C.W. Taylor, R.M. Hare and Jonathan Barnes, Greek Philosophers, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 (1982), 103–189, here 117–119.
  36. Calian, Florin George (2021). Numbers, Ontologically Speaking: Plato on Numerosity. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-46722-4. Archived from the original on 7 May 2023. Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  37. Riginos 1976, p. 73.
  38. Nails 2002, p. 7.
  39. Dillon 2003, pp. 1–3.
  40. Nails 2006, p. 7.
  41. Nails 2006, p. 10.
  42. Waterfield 2023, p. 87.
  43. 43.0 43.1 Nails 2006, p. 11.
  44. Nails 2002, p. 249.
  45. 45.0 45.1 Nails 2002, pp. 249-250. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "FOOTNOTENails2002249-250" defined multiple times with different content
  46. Francis Cornford, 1941. The Republic of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. xxv.
  47. Kidder, D. S. and Oppenheim, N. D. (2006), The Intellectual Devotional, p. 27, Borders Group, Inc, Ann Arbor, ISBN 978-1-60961-205-4.
  48. "‪Plato's Psychology of Action and the Origin of Agency‬". scholar.google.de.
  49. Dorter 2006, p. 360.
  50. Jorgenson 2018.
  51. Baird & Kaufmann 2008.
  52. Fine 2003, p. 5.
  53. McDowell 1973, p. 256.
  54. Taylor 2011, pp. 176–187.
  55. Lee 2011, p. 432.
  56. Taylor 2011, p. 189.
  57. Blössner 2007, pp. 345–349.
  58. Blössner 2007, p. 350.
  59. Phaedrus (265a–c)
  60. Kastely 2015.
  61. Jorgenson 2018, p. 199.
  62. Partenie, Catalin. "Plato's Myths". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 27 May 2017. Retrieved 29 October 2017.
  63. Reale 1990, p. 14f.
  64. Hans Joachim Krämer and John R. Catan, Plato and the Foundations of Metaphysics: A Work on the Theory of the Principles and Unwritten Doctrines of Plato with a Collection of the Fundamental Documents (SUNY Press, 1990).
  65. Gaiser 1998.
  66. 66.0 66.1 Brumbaugh & Wells 1989.
  67. Allen 1975, p. 12.
  68. Cooper 1997, pp. viii–xii.
  69. 69.0 69.1 69.2 Cooper 1997.
  70. Fine 1999a, p. 482.
  71. Cooper 1997, pp. v–vi.
  72. Fine 1999b.
  73. Cooper 1997, p. xiv.
  74. Kraut 2013.
  75. Willinsky, John (2018). The Intellectual Properties of Learning: A Prehistory from Saint Jerome to John Locke (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (published 2 January 2018). pp. Chapter 6. ISBN 978-0226487922.
  76. 76.0 76.1 Aminrazavi 2021.
  77. Stefaniuk, Tomasz (5 December 2022). "Man in Early Islamic Philosophy – Al-Kindi and Al-Farabi". Ruch Filozoficzny. 78 (3): 65–84. doi:10.12775/RF.2022.023. ISSN 2545-3173.
  78. Burrell 1998.
  79. Hasse 2002, pp. 33–45.
  80. Carrigan, Henry L. Jr. (2012) [2011]. "Cambridge Platonists". The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc0219. ISBN 978-1405157629.
  81. Einstein 1949, pp. 683–684.
  82. "A.N Whitehead on Plato". Columbia College. Archived from the original on 29 October 2023.
  83. Gettier, E. L. (1 June 1963). "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?". Analysis. 23 (6): 121–123. doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121.

References[edit | edit source]

  • Allen, Michael J.B. (1975). "Introduction". Marsilio Ficino: The Philebus Commentary. University of California Press. pp. 1–58.
  • Aminrazavi, Mehdi (2021). "Mysticism in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Baird, Forrest E.; Kaufmann, Walter, eds. (2008). Philosophic Classics: From Plato to Derrida (Fifth ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-158591-1.
  • Blössner, Norbert (2007). "The City-Soul Analogy". In Ferrari, G.R.F. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic. Translated by G.R.F. Ferrari. Cambridge University Press.
  • Brumbaugh, Robert S.; Wells, Rulon S. (October 1989). "Completing Yale's Microfilm Project". The Yale University Library Gazette. 64 (1/2): 73–75. JSTOR 40858970.
  • Burrell, David (1998). "Platonism in Islamic Philosophy". In Craig, Edward (ed.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 7. Routledge. pp. 429–430.
  • Cooper, John M.; Hutchinson, D.S., eds. (1997). Plato: Complete Works. Hackett Publishing.
  • Dillon, John (2003). The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy. Oxford University Press.
  • Dorter, Kenneth (2006). The Transformation of Plato's Republic. Lexington Books.
  • Einstein, Albert (1949). "Remarks to the Essays Appearing in this Collective Volume". In Schilpp (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. The Library of Living Philosophers. Vol. 7. MJF Books. pp. 663–688.
  • Fine, Gail (1999a). "Selected Bibliography". Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 481–494.
  • Fine, Gail (1999b). "Introduction". Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–33.
  • Fine, Gail (2003). "Introduction". Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
  • Gaiser, Konrad (1998). Reale, Giovanni (ed.). Testimonia Platonica: Le antiche testimonianze sulle dottrine non scritte di Platone. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.
  • Guthrie, W.K.C. (1986). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 4, Plato: The Man and His Dialogues: Earlier Period. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-31101-4.
  • Hasse, Dag Nikolaus (2002). "Plato Arabico-latinus". In Gersh; Hoenen (eds.). The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach. De Gruyter. pp. 33–66.
  • Jorgenson, Chad (5 April 2018). The Embodied Soul in Plato's Later Thought. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-80052-2. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
  • Kastely, James L. (25 August 2015). The Rhetoric of Plato's Republic: Democracy and the Philosophical Problem of Persuasion. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-27876-6. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
  • Kraut, Richard (11 September 2013). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). "Plato". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Archived from the original on 6 September 2018. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  • Lee, M.-K. (2011). "The Theaetetus". In Fine, G. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford University Press. pp. 411–436.
  • McDowell, J. (1973). Plato: Theaetetus. Oxford University Press.
  • Nails, Debra (2002). The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Hackett Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87220-564-2.
  • Nails, Debra (2006). "The Life of Plato of Athens". A Companion to Plato edited by Hugh H. Benson. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 1–12. doi:10.1002/9780470996256.ch1. ISBN 1-4051-1521-1.
  • Notopoulos, A. (April 1939). "The Name of Plato". Classical Philology. 34 (2): 135–145. doi:10.1086/362227. S2CID 161505593.
  • Reale, Giovanni (1990). Catan, John R. (ed.). Plato and Aristotle. A History of Ancient Philosophy. Vol. 2. State University of New York Press.
  • Riginos, Alice (1976). Platonica : the anecdotes concerning the life and writings of Plato. Leiden: E.J. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-04565-1.
  • Strauss, Leo (1964). The City and the Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Taylor, C.C.W. (2011). "Plato's Epistemology". In Fine, G. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford University Press. pp. 165–190.
  • Vlastos, Gregory (1991). Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge University Press.
  • Waterfield, Robin (2023). Plato of Athens: A Life in Philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-756475-2. Retrieved 5 May 2025.
  • Whitehead, Alfred North (1978). Process and Reality. New York: The Free Press.

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Plato navbox