Autopatrolled, New page reviewers, Rollbackers
2,168
edits
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
(→Oppose) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
=====Oppose===== | =====Oppose===== | ||
# | # My primary concern is related to Muskit's maturity and level of experience. It appears that Muskit may still be in the early stages of their journey within the Bharatpedia community, and their experience may not be extensive enough to handle the diverse challenges that come with an admin role. Admins play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and functionality of the platform, and it is essential to ensure that candidates possess the necessary experience to make well-informed decisions. | ||
:: Additionally, I have observed that Muskit's focus seems to be rather narrow as well as some of his articles denied of lacking proper sources [https://en.bharatpedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Muskit_Gergous&action=submit] , conflict with admin WikiDwarf[https://en.bharatpedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Muskit_Gergous&action=submit]. A well-rounded admin should have a broad understanding of the various facets of the community, and their decisions should reflect consideration for the diverse needs and opinions of its members. If elected, it is crucial that an admin is capable of addressing a wide range of issues and contributing to the platform's growth holistically. | |||
:: I want to emphasize that my opposition is not a personal attack on Muskit but rather a consideration of the qualifications and attributes necessary for a successful admin. It is important for Bharatpedia to have a team of administrators who collectively possess the skills, experience, and maturity required to lead the community effectively. [[User:Magadha Historian|Magadha Historian]] ([[User talk:Magadha Historian|talk]]) 15:04, 29 November 2023 (IST) | |||
<!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> | <!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> |