Three Hundred Ramayanas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation

From Bharatpedia, an open encyclopedia
Scan the QR code to donate via UPI
Urgent notice: The yearly subscription to host Bharatpedia and its sister projects will expire in March 2023 and the cost to renew the server for another year is ₹150,000 so we would like to request you please come forward and help us keep Bharatpedia running. We are a small non-profit that depends on donations so if you find this encyclopedia or its sister projects useful, take a minute to donate. Show the world that access to reliable, neutral information matters to you. Thank you.

Please select an option below or scan the QR code to donate
₹150 ₹500 ₹1,000 ₹2,000 ₹5,000 ₹10,000 Other



transparency: ₹1800 raised out of ₹150,000 (4 supporter)
last donation recorded 45 days ago

"Three Hundred Rāmāyaṇas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation" is an essay written by Indian writer A. K. Ramanujan for a Conference on Comparison of Civilizations at the University of Pittsburgh, February 1987.

The essay was a required reading on Delhi University's syllabus for history undergraduates from 2006–7 onward. On October 9, 2011, the Academic Council of the University decided to remove the essay from the BA curriculum for its next academic cycle. This action of the Academic Council attracted a lot of attention and several people viewed this as an act of unwarranted censorship.

Ramanujan's thesis[edit | edit source]

Three Hundred Rāmāyaṇas is a scholarly essay that summarizes the history of the Rāmāyaṇa and its spread across India and Asia over a period of 2,500 years or more. It seeks to demonstrate factually how the story of Rama has undergone numerous variations while being transmitted across different languages, societies, geographical regions, religions, and historical periods. It does not seek to document all the recorded tellings and re-tellings of the Rāmāyaṇa. Instead, it focuses on only five specific tellings of the Rāmāyaṇa from different languages, regions, cultures, and periods, which serve purely as indicators of a much larger range of actual variations.

The count of 300 Ramayanas in the title of the essay is based on a work of Camille Bulcke[1] and it has been pointed out that it is an underestimate of the actual count. However, Ramanujan considers only five tellings of Ramayana, namely, the tellings by Valmiki, Kamban, the Jain telling, the Thai Ramakien and the South Indian folk tellings. Ramanujan specifically prefers the term "tellings" to the usual terms "versions" and "variants" because the latter terms can and do imply the existence of an invariant original text. One of Ramanujan's main observations in the essay is that there is no such original Ramayana and that Valmiki's Ramayana telling is only one among many Ramayana tellings.

Publication history[edit | edit source]

  1. A. K. Ramanujan, ‘Three Hundred Rāmāyaṇas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation’, in Many Rāmāyaṇas: The Diversity of a Narrative Tradition in South Asia, ed. by Paula Richman (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), pp. 22–48. ISBN 9780520075894. Available at
  2. A. K. Ramanujan, ‘Three Hundred Rāmāyaṇas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation’, in The Collected Essays of A. K. Ramanujan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 131–60, available here.

Further reading[edit | edit source]

A website discussing the issues surrounding the essay (Now archived as original link no longer exists)[edit | edit source]

Arguments against the inclusion of the essay in the curriculum[edit | edit source]

The following sources provide more information on the arguments against the inclusion of the essay in the curriculum:

Implications of the removal of the essay from the curriculum[edit | edit source]

The following are some of the sources that discuss the implications of the removal of the essay from the curriculum:

  • Ajoy Ashirwad Mahaprashasta (18 November 2011). "The rule of unreason". Frontline. 28 (23). Retrieved 15 November 2015.

News reports on opposition to the essay[edit | edit source]

Some news reports indicating the nature and extent of opposition to the essay:

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Camille Bulcke (1950). Ramakatha: utpatti aur Vikas(The rama Story: Origin and Development) (Hindi). Prayag: Hindi Parishad Prakasan.

External links[edit | edit source]