Bharatpedia

Bharatpedia:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment

Bharatpedia:WikiProject Psychology/Tabs

Shortcut

This is the WikiProject Psychology article assessment page. Our assessments are based on the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, as part of their Work via WikiProjects initiative.

InstructionsEdit

QualityEdit

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Psychology}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Bharatpedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class psychology articles)   FA 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class psychology articles)   GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class psychology articles)   B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class psychology articles)   C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class psychology articles)   Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class psychology articles)   Stub 

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed psychology articles)   ??? 

ImportanceEdit

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Psychology}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Bharatpedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance psychology articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance psychology articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance psychology articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance psychology articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance psychology articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance psychology articles)  ??? 

It is also possible to use |imp= for this purpose.

Grading schemeEdit

Quality scaleEdit

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
  FA  The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from BP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:Bharatpedia:Featured article criteria
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)
  FL  The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from BP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:Bharatpedia:Featured list criteria
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
  A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
{{Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria|raw=yes}}
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. BP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
  GA  The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from BP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
Bharatpedia:Good article criteria
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron
(as of April 2019)
  B  The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
Bharatpedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology
(as of January 2024)
  C  The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing
(as of June 2018)
  Start  An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ball
(as of September 2014)
  Stub  A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology)
(as of December 2014)
  List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements

Importance scaleEdit

The article's importance, regardless of its quality

Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid Subject fills in more minor details
Low Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial

Bharatpedia:WikiProject Psychology/Importance

Hall of heroesEdit

This is a space, created October 2021, to commemorate significant efforts in assessment.

  • Bibeyjj: added 6 October 2021, for getting quality assessments to 100% and maintaining it there. --Muskit Gergous (talk) 02:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

See alsoEdit

Requesting an assessment or re-assessmentEdit

What you can accomplish here

This process is to find out whether your article is currently assessed at the correct quality level (Stub, Start, C, B) and correct importance (Low, Mid, High, Top). If you have significantly expanded an article and it is rated below B class, or if you feel the rating is otherwise incorrect, then please feel free to list it below.

What you can NOT accomplish here

  • If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, contact the volunteers at WT:PSYCH or list it at Peer review instead.
  • If you think the article is particularly well written, then you can nominate it as a possible Good article or even as a possible Featured article.

Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM, and remember to sign using ~~~~

ListEdit

Retrieved from "https://en.bharatpedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bharatpedia:WikiProject_Psychology/Assessment&oldid=454256"