Ashis Nandy: Difference between revisions

183 bytes removed ,  16 October 2021
m
v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)
imported>Indian English Literature
No edit summary
->WikiCleanerBot
m (v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation))
 
Line 120: Line 120:
==Awards==
==Awards==
* [[Fukuoka Asian Culture Prize]] in 2007
* [[Fukuoka Asian Culture Prize]] in 2007
* [[Hans-Kilian-Award]] in 2019


==Controversies==
==Controversies==
Line 131: Line 130:
[[Rajasthan Police]] lodged an [[First Information Report|FIR]] under the SC/ST Act against Ashis Nandy for his statement regarding corruption among the [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes|SC/ST]] and [[Other Backward Class|OBC]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/and-more/rajasthan-police-file-fir-summon-ashis-nandy_127053.htm|title=Rajasthan Police file FIR, summon Ashis Nandy|date=29 January 2013|publisher=}}</ref> After Nandy's lawyer moved the [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]] to quash all the allegations against him, the Court issued a stay order on his arrest on 1 February 2013.<ref name=DNA>{{cite news|last=ANI|title=JLF controversy: Supreme Court steps in to prevent Ashis Nandy's arrest|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_jlf-controversy-supreme-court-steps-in-to-prevent-ashis-nandy-s-arrest_1794923|accessdate=1 February 2013|newspaper=Daily News & Analysis|date=1 February 2013}}</ref> The subaltern scholar Dr. Satyanarayana has challenged Nandy's remarks and expressed shock at the vociferous support he received for this from the Indian media and academia, asking rhetorically, "Is Prof.&nbsp;Nandy a holy cow?".<ref>{{cite web|title=Is Prof. Ashis Nandy a holy cow?|url=http://roundtableindia.co.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6195:qis-ashis-nandy-a-sacred-cowq&catid=119:feature&Itemid=132|work=Roundtableindia.co.in|publisher=roundtableindia|accessdate=2 March 2014}}</ref>{{POV check inline|reason=Supporting views not mentioned|date=November 2016}}
[[Rajasthan Police]] lodged an [[First Information Report|FIR]] under the SC/ST Act against Ashis Nandy for his statement regarding corruption among the [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes|SC/ST]] and [[Other Backward Class|OBC]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/and-more/rajasthan-police-file-fir-summon-ashis-nandy_127053.htm|title=Rajasthan Police file FIR, summon Ashis Nandy|date=29 January 2013|publisher=}}</ref> After Nandy's lawyer moved the [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]] to quash all the allegations against him, the Court issued a stay order on his arrest on 1 February 2013.<ref name=DNA>{{cite news|last=ANI|title=JLF controversy: Supreme Court steps in to prevent Ashis Nandy's arrest|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_jlf-controversy-supreme-court-steps-in-to-prevent-ashis-nandy-s-arrest_1794923|accessdate=1 February 2013|newspaper=Daily News & Analysis|date=1 February 2013}}</ref> The subaltern scholar Dr. Satyanarayana has challenged Nandy's remarks and expressed shock at the vociferous support he received for this from the Indian media and academia, asking rhetorically, "Is Prof.&nbsp;Nandy a holy cow?".<ref>{{cite web|title=Is Prof. Ashis Nandy a holy cow?|url=http://roundtableindia.co.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6195:qis-ashis-nandy-a-sacred-cowq&catid=119:feature&Itemid=132|work=Roundtableindia.co.in|publisher=roundtableindia|accessdate=2 March 2014}}</ref>{{POV check inline|reason=Supporting views not mentioned|date=November 2016}}


Scholars say Nandy was at his [[Satire|satirical]] best when he made the comment but the [[sarcasm]] was lost on his detractors. They took this as an opportunity to attack him. But Nandy's sarcasm is well known in academic circles who were not surprised by the comment. In fact, he found support from academic quarters. Interestingly, three years later, in 2016-17, he received the KK Daomdaran Award from the Sree Narayana Mandira Samiti, Mumbai for his lifetime achievement as a scholar and intellectual, and for his contribution to the cause of the marginalised communities and castes. In 2019 he received the prestigious [[Hans-Kilian-Award|Hans-Kilian Award]] from [[Kohler Foundation]] in Germany for "research and advancement of meta-cultural humanisation".
Scholars say Nandy was at his [[Satire|satirical]] best when he made the comment but the [[sarcasm]] was lost on his detractors. They took this as an opportunity to attack him. But Nandy's sarcasm is well known in academic circles who were not surprised by the comment. In fact, he found support from academic quarters. Interestingly, three years later, in 2016-17, he received the KK Daomdaran Award from the Sree Narayana Mandira Samiti, Mumbai for his lifetime achievement as a scholar and intellectual, and for his contribution to the cause of the marginalised communities and castes.


== Views on Narendra Modi ==
== Views on Narendra Modi ==
{{BLP sources section|date=January 2020}}
In 2019, [[The New Yorker]] magazine reported:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/12/09/blood-and-soil-in-narendra-modis-india|title=Blood and Soil in Narendra Modi’s India|last=Filkins|first=Dexter|website=The New Yorker|language=en|access-date=2020-01-24}}</ref> “During the dispute over [[Babri Masjid]], Ashis Nandy began a series of interviews with [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh|R.S.S.]] members. A trained psychologist, he wanted to study the mentality of the rising [[Hindu nationalism|Hindu nationalists]]. One of those he met was [[Narendra Modi]], who was then a little-known [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] functionary. Nandy interviewed Modi for several hours, and came away shaken. His subject, Nandy told [the reporter], exhibited all the traits of an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] personality: puritanical rigidity, a constricted emotional life, fear of his own passions, and an enormous ego that protected a gnawing insecurity. During the interview, Modi elaborated a fantastical theory of how India was the target of a [[Global Conspiracy|global conspiracy]], in which every [[Muslims|Muslim]] in the country was likely complicit. ‘Modi was a [[Fascism|fascist]] in every sense,’ Nandy said. ‘I don’t mean this as a term of abuse. It’s a diagnostic category.’”
During the dispute over [[Babri Masjid]], Ashis Nandy began a series of interviews with [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh|RSS]] members. A trained psychologist, he wanted to study the mentality of the rising [[Hindu nationalism|Hindu nationalists]]. One of those he met was [[Narendra Modi]], who was then a little-known [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] functionary. Nandy interviewed Modi for several hours, and came away shaken. His subject, Nandy said, exhibited all the traits of an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] personality: puritanical rigidity, a constricted emotional life, fear of his own passions, and an enormous ego that protected a gnawing insecurity. During the interview, Modi elaborated a fantastical theory of how India was the target of a [[Global Conspiracy|global conspiracy]], in which every [[Muslims|Muslim]] in the country was likely complicit. Nandy said: <blockquote>"Modi was a fascist in every sense. I don’t mean this as a term of abuse. It’s a diagnostic category."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/12/09/blood-and-soil-in-narendra-modis-india|title=Blood and Soil in Narendra Modi’s India|last=Filkins|first=Dexter|website=The New Yorker|language=en|access-date=2020-01-24}}</ref></blockquote>


==Interviews==
==Interviews==
Anonymous user