User talk:Dokania

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ajay Kumar was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neelesh_Bodas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Bharatpedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neelesh_Bodas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page.

Ajay Kumar (talk) 16:18, 24 September 2026 (IST)

Sanskrit Bharatpedia

Hi, I've noticed that you've been making a lot of valuable contributions to Sanskrit-related articles on Bharatpedia. I really appreciate the time and effort you've been putting into improving the Sanskrit content.

Given your interest and contributions, I wanted to ask whether you would be interested in helping manage the sa:Sanskrit Bharatpedia. If you're interested, I can ask our tech team to set up the Sanskrit Bharatpedia for you to manage and provide you with the user rights required to manage and maintain the project.

I think your experience and continued contributions could be very valuable to the growth of Sanskrit Bharatpedia. Please let me know if this is something you'd be interested in. Thank you again for your excellent contributions! WikiDwarf (talk) 13:00, 27 September 2026 (IST)

I know Sanskrit and can help, but the main issue is that hardly anyone knows Sanskrit. That is why, even if we write articles in Sanskrit, almost no one reads them. I think it is better to write articles about Sanskrit topics in English so that people can actually read them. It is also worth noting that Sanskrit readers can generally read English, but the reverse is not true. If you can import articles from the Sanskrit Wikipedia, we can then make the necessary changes. Dokania (talk) 14:25, 27 September 2026 (IST)

A barnstar for you!

The Janitor's Barnstar Dokania, I award you this barnstar in recognition of your dedicated maintenance work in tagging and clearing nonsense draft pages through CSD. Keeping Bharatpedia free of clutter and low-quality drafts takes real patience, and your keen eye ensures our encyclopedia stays clean and credible. Keep up the excellent work! -- 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 23:16, 27 September 2026 (IST)

If CSD feature works in twinkle then it would be easier. Dokania (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Wikidwarf is working on the Twinkle project, and it will be fixed soon. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 23:48, 27 September 2026 (IST)

Hi there

You’re right that you have the ability to close some discussions as you did here[1], but I’d inform you to keep venue-specific closure norms in mind, because closing is not just a procedural button....it’s a judgment about consensus, policy, and who is allowed to assess that consensus. At AfD, the normal practice is for an uninvolved administrator to close the discussion. That is especially true for delete, BLP/legal/privacy-sensitive, contentious, or complex cases, and for any outcome that needs sysop tools. An uninvolved non-admin editor may close a clear-cut AfD, typically keep, no consensus, or redirect/merge when the result is obvious, no admin tools are needed, and there is no serious challenge. A non-admin should not close if they are involved, have commented, nominated, or !voted in the discussion. If the close would require deletion, protection, revision deletion, or sanctions, leave it to an admin. For requested moves, any uninvolved editor can close if consensus is clear, but technical moves may still need a page mover or admin. For noticeboards such as BP:AN, closures are normally handled by admins or clerks; non-admins should only close clear procedural threads and should leave blocks, sanctions, and contentious disputes to admins. For technical village pump threads, if implementation requires sysop or interface-admin rights or a Phabricator task, it’s usually best to leave the close to someone with the relevant rights or to summarize without closing. When you do close, please give a brief rationale, cite the relevant policy and guideline, and state the outcome clearly - keep, delete, merge, redirect, no consensus, relist, etc. If your close is challenged, don’t wheel-war; discuss it or let an admin review it. Thanks. 🍁Bharatwiki Socrates🍁(📩) 20:36, 8 October 2026 (IST)