No edit summary |
Ajay Kumar (talk | contribs) →Submission feedback: Reply |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{ping|WikiDwarf}} Please review I have updated the draft with additional reliable sources and made the requested improvements. Could you please review the latest version and, if everything looks good, accept/approve the submission [[User:Moviemover916|Moviemover916]] ([[User talk:Moviemover916|talk]]) 00:51, 30 June 2026 (IST) | {{ping|WikiDwarf}} Please review I have updated the draft with additional reliable sources and made the requested improvements. Could you please review the latest version and, if everything looks good, accept/approve the submission [[User:Moviemover916|Moviemover916]] ([[User talk:Moviemover916|talk]]) 00:51, 30 June 2026 (IST) | ||
:{{re|Moviemover916}} I reviewed the latest draft and made a number of improvements, including simplifying the prose, removing or trimming content that wasn't directly relevant to the biography, and replacing several references with stronger independent news sources where possible. | |||
:That said, I believe the article still needs additional work before it fully meets Bharatpedia's sourcing and notability standards. There are still a few claims that require better independent sources for verification, and some statements are currently supported only by production credits or database/profile sources rather than reliable news coverage. If stronger independent sources cannot be found for those claims, they should either be reworded or removed. | |||
:{{re|WikiDwarf}} I recommend one final sourcing review to ensure every substantive statement is independently verifiable and that the article clearly establishes the subject's notability through reliable coverage. [[User:Ajay Kumar|Ajay Kumar]] ([[User talk:Ajay Kumar|talk]]) 19:54, 1 July 2026 (IST) | |||
Revision as of 19:54, 1 July 2026
Submission feedback
@WikiDwarf: Please review I have updated the draft with additional reliable sources and made the requested improvements. Could you please review the latest version and, if everything looks good, accept/approve the submission Moviemover916 (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2026 (IST)
- @Moviemover916: I reviewed the latest draft and made a number of improvements, including simplifying the prose, removing or trimming content that wasn't directly relevant to the biography, and replacing several references with stronger independent news sources where possible.
- That said, I believe the article still needs additional work before it fully meets Bharatpedia's sourcing and notability standards. There are still a few claims that require better independent sources for verification, and some statements are currently supported only by production credits or database/profile sources rather than reliable news coverage. If stronger independent sources cannot be found for those claims, they should either be reworded or removed.
- @WikiDwarf: I recommend one final sourcing review to ensure every substantive statement is independently verifiable and that the article clearly establishes the subject's notability through reliable coverage. Ajay Kumar (talk) 19:54, 1 July 2026 (IST)