Gas-fired power plant: Difference between revisions

Created by Ajay Kumar
Last edited March 16, 2026
Created a new article
 
reworked page based on references as per guidelines
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Type of power station}}
{{use dmy dates|date=December 2021}}
{{use dmy dates|date=December 2021}}
{{Short description|One or more generators which convert Natural gas into electricity}}
[[File:Bayside Power Station.jpg|thumb|A [[natural gas]] plant in [[Canada]]]]
[[File:Berlin-mitte heizkraftwerk-mitte 20060605 629.jpg|thumb|A [[cogeneration]] plant in [[Berlin]]]]
[[File:Global-electricity-prod-source.png|thumb|upright=1.2|Gas generates over 20% of world electricity]]
[[File:Share-electricity-gas.svg|thumb|Share of electricity production from gas]]
[[File:Share-electricity-gas.svg|thumb|upright=1.2|Share of electricity production from gas]]
{{Latest pie chart of world power by source}}
A '''gas-fired power plant''', sometimes referred to as '''gas-fired power station''', '''natural gas power plant''', or '''methane gas power plant''', is a [[thermal power station]] that burns [[natural gas]] to [[electricity generation|generate electricity]]. Gas-fired power plants generate almost a quarter of [[Electric energy consumption|world electricity]] and are significant sources of [[greenhouse gas emissions]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-gas-conference-methane-idUKKBN1JP27E|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215184334/https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-gas-conference-methane-idUKKBN1JP27E|url-status=dead|title=Clean fuel? Methane leaks threaten natural gas' climate-friendly image|date=2018-06-29|archive-date=2019-02-15|work=Reuters|access-date=2019-06-30|language=en}}</ref>  
A gas-fired power plant (sometimes referred to as "gas-fired power station''"'' or "natural gas power plant") is a [[thermal power station]] that burns [[natural gas]] to [[electricity generation|generate electricity]]. Gas-fired power plants generate almost a quarter of [[Electric energy consumption|world electricity]] and are significant sources of [[greenhouse gas emissions]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-gas-conference-methane-idUKKBN1JP27E|title=Clean fuel? Methane leaks threaten natural gas' climate-friendly image|date=2018-06-29|work=Reuters|access-date=2019-06-30|language=en}}</ref> However, they can provide seasonal, [[dispatchable generation|dispatchable energy generation]] to compensate for [[variable renewable energy]] deficits, where [[hydropower]] or [[Electrical interconnector|interconnectors]] are not available.
 
Most energy planning relies on gas fired plants to provide [[dispatchable generation|dispatchable energy generation]] to compensate for [[variable renewable energy]] deficits, where [[hydropower]] or [[Electrical interconnector|interconnectors]] are not available. In the early 2020s [[Battery storage power station|batteries]] became competitive with gas [[Peaking power plant|peaker plants]].<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Mcfarlane |first1=Sarah |last2=Twidale |first2=Susanna |date=2023-11-21 |title=Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/giant-batteries-drain-economics-gas-power-plants-2023-11-21/ |access-date=2023-11-21}}</ref>
 
Some natural gas plants are dual fire with other kinds of fuels, such as oil, coal or hydrogen.{{cn|date=March 2026}} Most analysts don't think natural gas turbines will be successfully converted to hydrogen as part of the [[energy transition]], becoming a [[stranded asset]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-10 |title=The problem with making green hydrogen to fuel power plants |url=https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/hydrogen/the-problem-with-making-green-hydrogen-to-fuel-power-plants |access-date=2026-03-06 |website=Canary Media |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Myth of Hydrogen as an Energy Export Commodity – Spitfire Research Inc. |url=https://spitfireresearch.com/the-myth-of-hydrogen-as-an-energy-export-commodity/ |access-date=2026-03-07 |website=spitfireresearch.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Clark |first=Kevin |date=2024-09-12 |title=What’s the latest with burning hydrogen at gas plants? |url=https://www.power-eng.com/hydrogen/whats-the-latest-with-burning-hydrogen-at-gas-plants/ |access-date=2026-03-07 |website=Power Engineering |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Clark |first=Kevin |date=2024-08-06 |title=Report: Infrastructure, supply issues hamper hydrogen use in power generation |url=https://www.power-eng.com/hydrogen/report-infrastructure-supply-issues-hamper-hydrogen-use-in-power-generation/ |access-date=2026-03-07 |website=Power Engineering |language=en-US}}</ref>


==Basic concepts: heat into mechanical energy into electrical energy==
==Basic concepts: heat into mechanical energy into electrical energy==
{{See also|Thermal power station}}
{{See also|Thermal power station}}
A gas-fired power plant is a type of [[fossil fuel power station]] in which chemical energy stored in natural gas, which is mainly [[methane]], is converted successively into: [[thermal energy]], [[mechanical energy]] and, finally, [[electrical energy]]. Although they cannot exceed the [[Carnot cycle]] limit for conversion of heat energy into useful work the excess heat may be used in [[cogeneration]] plants to heat buildings, produce hot water, or to heat materials on an industrial scale.
A gas-fired power plant is a type of [[fossil fuel power station]] in which chemical energy stored in natural gas, which is mainly [[methane]], is converted successively into: [[thermal energy]], [[mechanical energy]] and, finally, [[electrical energy]]. Although they cannot exceed the [[Carnot cycle]] limit for conversion of heat energy into useful work, the excess heat, ie the difference between the chemical energy used up and the useful work generated, may be used in [[cogeneration]] plants to heat buildings, to produce hot water, or to heat materials on an industrial scale.


==Plant types==
==Plant types==
===Gas turbine===
{{See also|Gas turbine}}
[[File:Gateway Generating Station rectified.jpg|thumb|[[Gateway Generating Station]], a [[combined cycle power generation|combined-cycle]] gas-fired power station in California, uses two GE 7F.04 combustion turbines to burn [[natural gas]].]]
[[File:GE H series Gas Turbine.jpg|thumb|GE H series power generation gas turbine: in [[combined cycle]] configuration, its highest [[thermodynamic efficiency]] is 62.22%]]
Industrial gas turbines differ from aeronautical designs in that the frames, bearings, and blading are of heavier construction. They are also much more closely integrated with the devices they power—often an [[electric generator]]—and the secondary-energy equipment that is used to recover residual energy (largely heat).
Gas turbines can be particularly efficient when [[waste heat]] from the turbine is recovered by a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) to power a conventional steam turbine in a [[combined cycle]] configuration.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://memagazineblog.org/2012/07/01/efficiency-by-the-numbers/ |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130207053320/http://memagazineblog.org/2012/07/01/efficiency-by-the-numbers/ |url-status= dead |archive-date= 7 February 2013 |title= Efficiency by the Numbers |first=Lee S. |last=Langston |date= July 2012 }}</ref> The 605 MW [[General Electric]] 9HA achieved a 62.22% efficiency rate with temperatures as high as {{convert|2800|°F|°C|order=flip}}.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://www.gereports.com/bouchain/ |title=Here's Why The Latest Guinness World Record Will Keep France Lit Up Long After Soccer Fans Leave |first=Tomas |last=Kellner |publisher=[[General Electric]] |date=17 June 2016 |access-date=21 June 2016 |archive-date=16 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170616021542/http://www.gereports.com/bouchain/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
For 2018, GE offers its 826 MW HA at over 64% efficiency in combined cycle due to advances in [[additive manufacturing]] and combustion breakthroughs, up from 63.7% in 2017 orders and on track to achieve 65% by the early 2020s.<ref>{{cite press release |url= https://www.genewsroom.com/press-releases/ha-technology-now-available-industry-first-64-percent-efficiency-284144 |title= HA technology now available at industry-first 64 percent efficiency |date= 4 December 2017 |publisher= GE Power |access-date= 12 November 2024 |archive-date= 4 December 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181204120609/https://www.genewsroom.com/press-releases/ha-technology-now-available-industry-first-64-percent-efficiency-284144 |url-status= dead }}</ref>
In March 2018, GE Power achieved a 63.08% gross efficiency for its 7HA turbine.<ref>{{cite press release |url= https://www.ge.com/news/press-releases/ges-ha-gas-turbine-delivers-second-world-record-efficiency/ |title= GE's HA Gas Turbine Delivers Second World Record for Efficiency |publisher= GE Power |date= March 27, 2018}}</ref>
Aeroderivative gas turbines can also be used in combined cycles, leading to a higher efficiency, but it will not be as high as a specifically designed industrial gas turbine. They can also be run in a [[cogeneration]] configuration: the exhaust is used for space or water heating, or drives an [[absorption chiller]] for cooling the inlet air and increase the power output, technology known as [[turbine inlet air cooling]].
Another significant advantage is their ability to be turned on and off within minutes, supplying power during peak, or unscheduled, demand. Since single cycle (gas turbine only) power plants are less efficient than combined cycle plants, they are usually used as [[peaking power plant]]s, which operate anywhere from several hours per day to a few dozen hours per year—depending on the electricity demand and the generating capacity of the region. In areas with a shortage of base-load and [[load following power plant]] capacity or with low fuel costs, a gas turbine powerplant may regularly operate most hours of the day. A large single-cycle gas turbine typically produces 100 to 400&nbsp;megawatts of electric power and has 35–40% [[thermodynamic efficiency]].<ref name=siemens>{{cite web |first1=Phil |last1=Ratliff |first2=Paul |last2=Garbett |first3=Willibald |last3=Fischer |title=The New Siemens Gas Turbine SGT5-8000H for More Customer Benefit |work=VGB PowerTech |publisher=Siemens Power Generation |date=September 2007 |url=http://www.energy.siemens.com/us/pool/hq/power-generation/gas-turbines/downloads/SGT5-8000H_benefits.pdf |access-date=17 July 2010 |archive-date=13 August 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110813030259/http://www.energy.siemens.com/us/pool/hq/power-generation/gas-turbines/downloads/SGT5-8000H_benefits.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
[[File:Forssan varavoimala.JPG|thumb|[[Fingrid Oyj]]'s [[gas turbine]] power plant in [[Forssa]], [[Finland]]]]
[[File:Forssan varavoimala.JPG|thumb|[[Fingrid Oyj]]'s [[gas turbine]] power plant in [[Forssa]], [[Finland]]]]
===Simple cycle gas-turbine===
In a simple cycle gas-turbine, also known as open-cycle gas-turbine (OCGT), hot gas drives a [[gas turbine]] to generate electricity. This type of plant is relatively cheap to build and can start very quickly, but due to its lower efficiency is at most is only run for a few hours a day as a [[peaking power plant]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Simple_cycle_gas_plant|title=Simple cycle gas plant - Energy Education|website=energyeducation.ca|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>


===Combined cycle gas-turbine (CCGT) ===
====Simple cycle gas-turbine====
In a simple cycle gas-turbine, also known as open-cycle gas-turbine (OCGT) generators, hot gas drives a [[gas turbine]] to generate electricity. This type of plant is relatively cheap to build and can start very quickly, but due to its lower efficiency is at most only run for a few hours a day as a [[peaking power plant]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Simple_cycle_gas_plant|title=Simple cycle gas plant - Energy Education|website=energyeducation.ca|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>
 
====Combined cycle gas-turbine (CCGT) ====
{{Main|Combined cycle power plant}}
{{Main|Combined cycle power plant}}


[[File:Gateway Generating Station rectified.jpg|thumb|[[Gateway Generating Station]], a [[Combined cycle power plant|combined-cycle]] gas-fired power station in California.]]
CCGT power plants consist of simple cycle gas-turbines which use the [[Brayton cycle]], followed by a [[heat recovery steam generator]] and a [[steam turbine]] which use the [[Rankine cycle]]. The most common configuration is two gas-turbines supporting one steam turbine.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=38312|title=Power blocks in natural gas-fired combined-cycle plants are getting bigger - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)|website=www.eia.gov|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> They are slightly more expensive than simple cycle plants but can achieve efficiencies up to 55% and dispatch times of around half an hour.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Combined_cycle_gas_plant|title=Combined cycle gas plant - Energy Education|website=energyeducation.ca|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>


CCGT power plants consist of simple cycle gas-turbines which use the [[Brayton cycle]], followed by a [[heat recovery steam generator]] and a [[steam turbine]] which use the [[Rankine cycle]]. The most common configuration is two gas-turbines supporting one steam turbine.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=38312|title=Power blocks in natural gas-fired combined-cycle plants are getting bigger - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)|website=www.eia.gov|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> They are more efficient than simple cycle plants and can achieve efficiencies up to 55% and dispatch times of around half an hour.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Combined_cycle_gas_plant|title=Combined cycle gas plant - Energy Education|website=energyeducation.ca|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>
===Steam turbine===
Gas-steam plants use gas to fire boilers which produce steam to turn steam turbines. Many of these types of plants were constructed through the 20th century as a direct alternative to coal plants. They lack the quick-start capabilities of simple cycle gas turbine plants, and are much less efficient than combined cycle plants. Owing to their age and deficiencies, they represent the vast majority of gas retirements in the United States, however, they still represent an option for extending the life of coal powered plants while reducing emissions by converting to gas burners.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://insight.factset.com/gas-power-plant-retirement-outlook |title=Gas Power Plant Retirement Outlook |last=Bradford |first=Andrew |date=28 October 2020 |website=FactSet |access-date=3 March 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.power-eng.com/environmental-emissions/oklahoma-gas-and-electric-eyes-coal-to-gas-switches-at-muskogee/ |title=Oklahoma Gas and Electric eyes coal-to-gas switches at Muskogee |last=Cassell |first=Barry |date=11 June 2014 |website=power-eng |access-date=3 March 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/RAC/2_Spruce2%20Gas%20Conversion%2001202022%20final%20.pdf |title=Spruce 2 Gas Conversion |last=Ethridge |first=Benjamin |date=20 January 2022 |access-date=3 March 2025}}</ref>


===Reciprocating engine===
===Reciprocating engine===
{{See also|Reciprocating engine}}
{{See also|Reciprocating engine}}


Reciprocating [[internal combustion engines]] tend to be under 20MW, so much smaller than other types of natural gas-fired electricity generator, and are typically used for emergency power or to balance variable renewable energy such as wind and solar.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=37972|title=Natural gas-fired reciprocating engines are being deployed more to balance renewables - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)|website=www.eia.gov|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>
Reciprocating [[internal combustion engine]]s tend to be under 20 MW, thus much smaller than other types of natural gas-fired electricity generator, and are typically used for emergency power or to balance variable renewable energy such as wind and solar.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=37972|title=Natural gas-fired reciprocating engines are being deployed more to balance renewables - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)|website=www.eia.gov|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>


==Greenhouse gas emissions==
==Greenhouse gas emissions==
In total gas-fired power stations emit about {{convert|450|g|lb|0}} of [[carbon dioxide|{{CO2}}]] per [[kilowatt-hour]] of electricity generated.<ref name="rue21">{{cite news |title=How sustainable is wind power? |date=2021-12-27 |first=Gero |last=Rueter |work=Deutsche Welle |url=https://m.dw.com/en/how-sustainable-is-wind-power/a-60268971 |access-date=2021-12-28 |quote=An onshore wind turbine that is newly built today produces around nine grams of CO2 for every kilowatt hour (kWh) it generates ... a new offshore plant in the sea emits seven grams of CO2 per kWh ... solar power plants emit 33 grams CO2 for every kWh generated ... natural gas produces 442 grams CO2 per kWh, power from hard coal 864 grams, and power from lignite, or brown coal, 1034 grams ... nuclear energy accounts for about 117 grams of CO2 per kWh, considering the emissions caused by uranium mining and the construction and operation of nuclear reactors. }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rosselot |first1=Kirsten S. |last2=Allen |first2=David T. |last3=Ku |first3=Anthony Y. |date=2021-07-05 |title=Comparing Greenhouse Gas Impacts from Domestic Coal and Imported Natural Gas Electricity Generation in China |url=https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01517 |journal=ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering |language=en |volume=9 |issue=26 |pages=8759–8769 |doi=10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01517 |s2cid=237875562 |issn=2168-0485|doi-access=free }}</ref> This is about half that of [[coal-fired power station]]s but much more than [[nuclear power plant]]s and [[renewable energy]].<ref name="rue21" /> [[Life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of energy sources|Life-cycle emissions]] of gas-fired power stations may be impacted by [[methane emissions]] such as from [[gas leak]]s.<ref>{{Cite news |title=A satellite finds massive methane leaks from gas pipelines |language=en |work=NPR.org |url=https://www.npr.org/2022/02/03/1077392791/a-satellite-finds-massive-methane-leaks-from-gas-pipelines |access-date=2022-05-09}}</ref>
Relatively efficient gas-fired power stations – such as those based on combined cycle gas turbines – emit about {{convert|450|g|oz|0}} of [[carbon dioxide|{{CO2}}]] per [[kilowatt-hour]] of electricity generated.<ref name="rue21">{{cite news |title=How sustainable is wind power? |date=2021-12-27 |first=Gero |last=Rueter |work=Deutsche Welle |url=https://m.dw.com/en/how-sustainable-is-wind-power/a-60268971 |access-date=2021-12-28 |quote=An onshore wind turbine that is newly built today produces around nine grams of CO2 for every kilowatt hour (kWh) it generates ... a new offshore plant in the sea emits seven grams of CO2 per kWh ... solar power plants emit 33 grams CO2 for every kWh generated ... natural gas produces 442 grams CO2 per kWh, power from hard coal 864 grams, and power from lignite, or brown coal, 1034 grams ... nuclear energy accounts for about 117 grams of CO2 per kWh, considering the emissions caused by uranium mining and the construction and operation of nuclear reactors. }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rosselot |first1=Kirsten S. |last2=Allen |first2=David T. |last3=Ku |first3=Anthony Y. |date=2021-07-05 |title=Comparing Greenhouse Gas Impacts from Domestic Coal and Imported Natural Gas Electricity Generation in China |journal=ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering |language=en |volume=9 |issue=26 |pages=8759–8769 |doi=10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01517 |s2cid=237875562 |issn=2168-0485|doi-access=free }}</ref> This is about half that of [[coal-fired power station]]s but much more than [[nuclear power plant]]s and [[renewable energy]].<ref name="rue21" /> However, the more flexible simple-cycle turbines have a significantly higher emissions intensity, frequently as high as {{convert|670|g|oz|0}} of CO<sub>2</sub> per kWh,<ref>{{Cite web |last=McConnell |first=Dylan |date=2017-02-24 |title=Our power grid is crying out for capacity, but should we open the gas valves? |url=https://theconversation.com/our-power-grid-is-crying-out-for-capacity-but-should-we-open-the-gas-valves-72355 |access-date=2024-10-25 |website=The Conversation |language=en-AU}}</ref> and some older gas turbines can have emissions intensities comparable with even the most emissions intensive coal power stations.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gordon |first=Josh |date=2020-11-03 |title= Adam Bandt says gas is just as dirty as coal. Is he correct? |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-03/fact-check-is-gas-just-as-dirty-as-coal-adam-bandt/12838066 |access-date=2024-10-25 |website=RMIT ABC Fact Check |language=en-AU}}</ref>
 
However, full [[Life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of energy sources|Life-cycle emissions]] of gas-fired power stations is increased by [[methane emissions]] from [[gas leak]]s associated with gas production and distribution pipelines as well as from significant venting of waste CO<sub>2</sub> after [[amine gas treating]] if [[carbon capture and storage]] is employed.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy00osti/27715.pdf |title=Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Generation System |first1=Pamela L. |last1=Spath |first2=Margaret K. |last2=Mann |location=Golden, CO |publisher=[[NREL]] |date=September 2000 |access-date=2025-09-02}}</ref>


===Carbon capture===
===Carbon capture===
{{As of|2022}} very few power plants have [[carbon capture and storage]] or [[carbon capture and utilization]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chemnick |first=Jean |date=2022-05-09 |title=Why EPA might make new gas plants catch carbon |url=https://www.eenews.net/articles/why-epa-might-make-new-gas-plants-catch-carbon/ |access-date=2022-05-09 |website=E&E News |language=en-US}}</ref>
Very few power plants have [[carbon capture and storage]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chemnick |first=Jean |date=2022-05-09 |title=Why EPA might make new gas plants catch carbon |url=https://www.eenews.net/articles/why-epa-might-make-new-gas-plants-catch-carbon/ |access-date=2022-05-09 |website=E&E News |language=en-US}}</ref>


===Hydrogen===
===Hydrogen===
 
Gas-fired power plants can be modified to run on [[hydrogen]],<ref>{{cite news |title=The plan to convert the North to run on hydrogen |url=https://utilityweek.co.uk/plan-convert-north-run-hydrogen/ |first=Tom |last=Grimwood |url-access=subscription |work=Utility Week |date=2018-11-30}}</ref> and according to [[General Electric]] a more economically viable option than CCS would be to use more and more hydrogen in the gas turbine fuel.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ge-hydrogen-trumps-ccs-in-preserving-gas-turbines-in-a-carbon-free-grid/556585/|title=GE: Hydrogen trumps carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) in preserving gas turbines in a carbon-free grid|first=Catherine|last=Morehouse|website=Utility Dive|language=en-US|date=2019-06-11|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> Hydrogen can at first be created from natural gas through [[steam reforming]], or by heating to precipitate carbon, as a step towards a [[hydrogen economy]], thus eventually reducing carbon emissions.<ref>{{cite web |title=H-vision: blue hydrogen for a green future |date=11 February 2019 |url=https://www.gasworld.com/blue-hydrogen-for-a-green-future/2016596.article |url-access=subscription |first=Joanna |last=Sampson |website=Gas World |access-date=2019-05-09}}</ref> However others think low-carbon hydrogen (such as [[natural hydrogen]]) should be used for things which are harder to [[decarbonize]], such as making [[fertilizer]], so there may not be enough for electricity generation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Hydrogen could be used for nearly everything. It probably shouldn't be. |url=https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/04/25/1091757/hydrogen-uses-ranked/ |first=Casey |last=Crownhart |date=2024-04-25 |access-date=2024-10-05 |website=MIT Technology Review |language=en}}</ref>
Gas-fired power plants can be modified to run on [[hydrogen]]<ref>{{cite news |title=The plan to convert the North to run on hydrogen |url=https://utilityweek.co.uk/plan-convert-north-run-hydrogen/ |work=Utility Week |date=30 November 2018}}</ref> and according to [[General Electric]] a more economically viable option than CCS would be to use more and more [[hydrogen]] in the gas turbine fuel.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ge-hydrogen-trumps-ccs-in-preserving-gas-turbines-in-a-carbon-free-grid/556585/|title=GE: Hydrogen trumps carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) in preserving gas turbines in a carbon-free grid|website=Utility Dive|language=en-US|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> Hydrogen can at first be created from natural gas through [[steam reforming]], or by heating to precipitate carbon, as a step towards a [[hydrogen economy]], thus eventually reducing carbon emissions.<ref>{{cite web |title=H-vision: blue hydrogen for a green future |date=11 February 2019 |url=https://www.gasworld.com/blue-hydrogen-for-a-green-future/2016596.article |publisher=Gas World |access-date=9 May 2019}}</ref>


==Economics==
==Economics==
===New plants===
Sometimes a new [[battery storage power station]] together with [[solar power]] or [[wind power]] is cheaper in the long-term than building a new gas plant, as the gas plant risks becoming a [[stranded asset]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://solarmagazine.com/natural-gas-power-stranded-asset-risk-reaches-a-tipping-point/|title=Natural Gas Power Stranded Asset Risk Reaches a Tipping Point|last=Andrew Burger|date=2019-10-07|website=Solar Magazine|language=en-US|access-date=2019-10-20}}</ref>


===Existing plants===
===Existing plants===
{{As of|2019}} a few gas-fired power plants are being retired because they are unable to stop and start quickly enough.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/06/in-california-a-young-natural-gas-plant-closes-down-as-renewables-get-cheaper/|title=A 10-year-old natural gas plant in California gets the coal plant treatment|last=Geuss|first=Megan|date=2019-06-26|website=Ars Technica|language=en-us|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> However, despite the falling cost of [[variable renewable energy]] most existing gas-fired power plants remain profitable, especially in countries without a [[carbon price]], due to their [[dispatchable generation]] and because [[shale gas]] and [[liquefied natural gas]] prices have fallen since they were built.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.livemint.com/market/mark-to-market/torrent-power-shares-make-a-powerful-leap-after-gujarat-arrangement-1561709553829.html|title=Torrent Power shares make a powerful leap after Gujarat arrangement|last=Ram|first=R. Sree|date=2019-06-28|language=en|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> Even in places with a carbon price, such as the EU, existing gas-fired power stations remain economically viable, partly due to increasing restrictions on coal-fired power because of its pollution.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.worldoil.com/news/2019/6/11/natural-gas-price-plunge-signals-greener-start-for-2019-in-us-and-eu|title=Natural gas price plunge signals greener start for 2019 in U.S. and EU|website=www.worldoil.com|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>
{{As of|2019}} a few gas-fired power plants are being retired because they are unable to stop and start quickly enough.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/06/in-california-a-young-natural-gas-plant-closes-down-as-renewables-get-cheaper/|title=A 10-year-old natural gas plant in California gets the coal plant treatment|last=Geuss|first=Megan|date=2019-06-26|website=Ars Technica|language=en-us|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> Despite the falling cost of [[variable renewable energy]] most existing gas-fired power plants remain profitable, especially in countries without a [[carbon price]], due to their [[dispatchable generation]] and because [[shale gas]] and [[liquefied natural gas]] prices have fallen since they were built.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.livemint.com/market/mark-to-market/torrent-power-shares-make-a-powerful-leap-after-gujarat-arrangement-1561709553829.html|title=Torrent Power shares make a powerful leap after Gujarat arrangement|last=Ram|first=R. Sree|work=mint |date=2019-06-28|language=en|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref> Even in places with a carbon price, such as the EU, existing gas-fired power stations remain economically viable, partly due to increasing restrictions on coal-fired power because of its pollution.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.worldoil.com/news/2019/6/11/natural-gas-price-plunge-signals-greener-start-for-2019-in-us-and-eu|title=Natural gas price plunge signals greener start for 2019 in U.S. and EU|website=www.worldoil.com|access-date=2019-06-28}}</ref>


==Politics==
==Politics==
Even when replacing coal power the decision to build a new plant may be controversial.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49960817|title=UK overrules block on Drax power station plans|last=Harrabin|first=Roger|date=2019-10-07|access-date=2019-10-20|language=en-GB}}</ref>
{{Expand section|date=December 2025}}
Even when replacing coal power, the decision to build a new plant may be controversial.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49960817|title=UK overrules block on Drax power station plans|last=Harrabin|first=Roger|date=2019-10-07|access-date=2019-10-20|language=en-GB}}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[List of natural gas power stations]]
*[[List of natural gas power stations]]
{{clear}}
==References==
{{Reflist}}


==External links==
==External links==
* [https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-gas-plant-tracker/ Global gas plant tracker] by [[Global Energy Monitor]]
* [https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-gas-plant-tracker/ Global gas plant tracker] by [[Global Energy Monitor]]
==References==
{{Reflist}}


{{World topic|prefix=List of natural gas power stations in|title=List of natural gas power stations by country|noredlinks=yes|state=expanded}}
{{World topic|prefix=List of natural gas power stations in|title=List of natural gas power stations by country|noredlinks=yes|state=expanded}}
Line 60: Line 80:
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Natural gas-fired power stations]]
[[Category:Natural gas-fired power stations| ]]
[[Category:Natural gas phase-out]]
[[Category:Greenhouse gas emissions]]
[[Category:Greenhouse gas emissions]]

Latest revision as of 05:36, 16 March 2026


A natural gas plant in Canada
Gas generates over 20% of world electricity
Share of electricity production from gas

A gas-fired power plant, sometimes referred to as gas-fired power station, natural gas power plant, or methane gas power plant, is a thermal power station that burns natural gas to generate electricity. Gas-fired power plants generate almost a quarter of world electricity and are significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions.[1]

Most energy planning relies on gas fired plants to provide dispatchable energy generation to compensate for variable renewable energy deficits, where hydropower or interconnectors are not available. In the early 2020s batteries became competitive with gas peaker plants.[2]

Some natural gas plants are dual fire with other kinds of fuels, such as oil, coal or hydrogen.[citation needed] Most analysts don't think natural gas turbines will be successfully converted to hydrogen as part of the energy transition, becoming a stranded asset.[3][4][5][6]

Basic concepts: heat into mechanical energy into electrical energy[edit | edit source]

A gas-fired power plant is a type of fossil fuel power station in which chemical energy stored in natural gas, which is mainly methane, is converted successively into: thermal energy, mechanical energy and, finally, electrical energy. Although they cannot exceed the Carnot cycle limit for conversion of heat energy into useful work, the excess heat, ie the difference between the chemical energy used up and the useful work generated, may be used in cogeneration plants to heat buildings, to produce hot water, or to heat materials on an industrial scale.

Plant types[edit | edit source]

Gas turbine[edit | edit source]

Gateway Generating Station, a combined-cycle gas-fired power station in California, uses two GE 7F.04 combustion turbines to burn natural gas.
GE H series power generation gas turbine: in combined cycle configuration, its highest thermodynamic efficiency is 62.22%

Industrial gas turbines differ from aeronautical designs in that the frames, bearings, and blading are of heavier construction. They are also much more closely integrated with the devices they power—often an electric generator—and the secondary-energy equipment that is used to recover residual energy (largely heat).

Gas turbines can be particularly efficient when waste heat from the turbine is recovered by a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) to power a conventional steam turbine in a combined cycle configuration.[7] The 605 MW General Electric 9HA achieved a 62.22% efficiency rate with temperatures as high as 1,540 °C (2,800 °F).[8] For 2018, GE offers its 826 MW HA at over 64% efficiency in combined cycle due to advances in additive manufacturing and combustion breakthroughs, up from 63.7% in 2017 orders and on track to achieve 65% by the early 2020s.[9] In March 2018, GE Power achieved a 63.08% gross efficiency for its 7HA turbine.[10]

Aeroderivative gas turbines can also be used in combined cycles, leading to a higher efficiency, but it will not be as high as a specifically designed industrial gas turbine. They can also be run in a cogeneration configuration: the exhaust is used for space or water heating, or drives an absorption chiller for cooling the inlet air and increase the power output, technology known as turbine inlet air cooling.

Another significant advantage is their ability to be turned on and off within minutes, supplying power during peak, or unscheduled, demand. Since single cycle (gas turbine only) power plants are less efficient than combined cycle plants, they are usually used as peaking power plants, which operate anywhere from several hours per day to a few dozen hours per year—depending on the electricity demand and the generating capacity of the region. In areas with a shortage of base-load and load following power plant capacity or with low fuel costs, a gas turbine powerplant may regularly operate most hours of the day. A large single-cycle gas turbine typically produces 100 to 400 megawatts of electric power and has 35–40% thermodynamic efficiency.[11]

Fingrid Oyj's gas turbine power plant in Forssa, Finland

Simple cycle gas-turbine[edit | edit source]

In a simple cycle gas-turbine, also known as open-cycle gas-turbine (OCGT) generators, hot gas drives a gas turbine to generate electricity. This type of plant is relatively cheap to build and can start very quickly, but due to its lower efficiency is at most only run for a few hours a day as a peaking power plant.[12]

Combined cycle gas-turbine (CCGT)[edit | edit source]

CCGT power plants consist of simple cycle gas-turbines which use the Brayton cycle, followed by a heat recovery steam generator and a steam turbine which use the Rankine cycle. The most common configuration is two gas-turbines supporting one steam turbine.[13] They are slightly more expensive than simple cycle plants but can achieve efficiencies up to 55% and dispatch times of around half an hour.[14]

Steam turbine[edit | edit source]

Gas-steam plants use gas to fire boilers which produce steam to turn steam turbines. Many of these types of plants were constructed through the 20th century as a direct alternative to coal plants. They lack the quick-start capabilities of simple cycle gas turbine plants, and are much less efficient than combined cycle plants. Owing to their age and deficiencies, they represent the vast majority of gas retirements in the United States, however, they still represent an option for extending the life of coal powered plants while reducing emissions by converting to gas burners.[15][16][17]

Reciprocating engine[edit | edit source]

Reciprocating internal combustion engines tend to be under 20 MW, thus much smaller than other types of natural gas-fired electricity generator, and are typically used for emergency power or to balance variable renewable energy such as wind and solar.[18]

Greenhouse gas emissions[edit | edit source]

Relatively efficient gas-fired power stations – such as those based on combined cycle gas turbines – emit about 450 grams (16 oz) of CO
2
per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated.[19][20] This is about half that of coal-fired power stations but much more than nuclear power plants and renewable energy.[19] However, the more flexible simple-cycle turbines have a significantly higher emissions intensity, frequently as high as 670 grams (24 oz) of CO2 per kWh,[21] and some older gas turbines can have emissions intensities comparable with even the most emissions intensive coal power stations.[22]

However, full Life-cycle emissions of gas-fired power stations is increased by methane emissions from gas leaks associated with gas production and distribution pipelines as well as from significant venting of waste CO2 after amine gas treating if carbon capture and storage is employed.[23]

Carbon capture[edit | edit source]

Very few power plants have carbon capture and storage.[24]

Hydrogen[edit | edit source]

Gas-fired power plants can be modified to run on hydrogen,[25] and according to General Electric a more economically viable option than CCS would be to use more and more hydrogen in the gas turbine fuel.[26] Hydrogen can at first be created from natural gas through steam reforming, or by heating to precipitate carbon, as a step towards a hydrogen economy, thus eventually reducing carbon emissions.[27] However others think low-carbon hydrogen (such as natural hydrogen) should be used for things which are harder to decarbonize, such as making fertilizer, so there may not be enough for electricity generation.[28]

Economics[edit | edit source]

Existing plants[edit | edit source]

As of 2019 a few gas-fired power plants are being retired because they are unable to stop and start quickly enough.[29] Despite the falling cost of variable renewable energy most existing gas-fired power plants remain profitable, especially in countries without a carbon price, due to their dispatchable generation and because shale gas and liquefied natural gas prices have fallen since they were built.[30] Even in places with a carbon price, such as the EU, existing gas-fired power stations remain economically viable, partly due to increasing restrictions on coal-fired power because of its pollution.[31]

Politics[edit | edit source]

Even when replacing coal power, the decision to build a new plant may be controversial.[32]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. "Clean fuel? Methane leaks threaten natural gas' climate-friendly image". Reuters. 29 June 2018. Archived from the original on 15 February 2019. Retrieved 30 June 2019.
  2. Mcfarlane, Sarah; Twidale, Susanna (21 November 2023). "Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants". Reuters. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  3. "The problem with making green hydrogen to fuel power plants". Canary Media. 10 October 2023. Retrieved 6 March 2026.
  4. "The Myth of Hydrogen as an Energy Export Commodity – Spitfire Research Inc". spitfireresearch.com. Retrieved 7 March 2026.
  5. Clark, Kevin (12 September 2024). "What's the latest with burning hydrogen at gas plants?". Power Engineering. Retrieved 7 March 2026.
  6. Clark, Kevin (6 August 2024). "Report: Infrastructure, supply issues hamper hydrogen use in power generation". Power Engineering. Retrieved 7 March 2026.
  7. Langston, Lee S. (July 2012). "Efficiency by the Numbers". Archived from the original on 7 February 2013.
  8. Kellner, Tomas (17 June 2016). "Here's Why The Latest Guinness World Record Will Keep France Lit Up Long After Soccer Fans Leave" (Press release). General Electric. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
  9. "HA technology now available at industry-first 64 percent efficiency" (Press release). GE Power. 4 December 2017. Archived from the original on 4 December 2018. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  10. "GE's HA Gas Turbine Delivers Second World Record for Efficiency" (Press release). GE Power. 27 March 2018.
  11. Ratliff, Phil; Garbett, Paul; Fischer, Willibald (September 2007). "The New Siemens Gas Turbine SGT5-8000H for More Customer Benefit" (PDF). VGB PowerTech. Siemens Power Generation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  12. "Simple cycle gas plant - Energy Education". energyeducation.ca. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  13. "Power blocks in natural gas-fired combined-cycle plants are getting bigger - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  14. "Combined cycle gas plant - Energy Education". energyeducation.ca. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  15. Bradford, Andrew (28 October 2020). "Gas Power Plant Retirement Outlook". FactSet. Retrieved 3 March 2025.
  16. Cassell, Barry (11 June 2014). "Oklahoma Gas and Electric eyes coal-to-gas switches at Muskogee". power-eng. Retrieved 3 March 2025.
  17. Ethridge, Benjamin (20 January 2022). "Spruce 2 Gas Conversion" (PDF). Retrieved 3 March 2025.
  18. "Natural gas-fired reciprocating engines are being deployed more to balance renewables - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Rueter, Gero (27 December 2021). "How sustainable is wind power?". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 28 December 2021. An onshore wind turbine that is newly built today produces around nine grams of CO2 for every kilowatt hour (kWh) it generates ... a new offshore plant in the sea emits seven grams of CO2 per kWh ... solar power plants emit 33 grams CO2 for every kWh generated ... natural gas produces 442 grams CO2 per kWh, power from hard coal 864 grams, and power from lignite, or brown coal, 1034 grams ... nuclear energy accounts for about 117 grams of CO2 per kWh, considering the emissions caused by uranium mining and the construction and operation of nuclear reactors.
  20. Rosselot, Kirsten S.; Allen, David T.; Ku, Anthony Y. (5 July 2021). "Comparing Greenhouse Gas Impacts from Domestic Coal and Imported Natural Gas Electricity Generation in China". ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 9 (26): 8759–8769. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01517. ISSN 2168-0485. S2CID 237875562.
  21. McConnell, Dylan (24 February 2017). "Our power grid is crying out for capacity, but should we open the gas valves?". The Conversation. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  22. Gordon, Josh (3 November 2020). "Adam Bandt says gas is just as dirty as coal. Is he correct?". RMIT ABC Fact Check. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
  23. Spath, Pamela L.; Mann, Margaret K. (September 2000). Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Generation System (PDF) (Report). Golden, CO: NREL. Retrieved 2 September 2025.
  24. Chemnick, Jean (9 May 2022). "Why EPA might make new gas plants catch carbon". E&E News. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
  25. Grimwood, Tom (30 November 2018). "The plan to convert the North to run on hydrogen". Utility Week.
  26. Morehouse, Catherine (11 June 2019). "GE: Hydrogen trumps carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) in preserving gas turbines in a carbon-free grid". Utility Dive. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  27. Sampson, Joanna (11 February 2019). "H-vision: blue hydrogen for a green future". Gas World. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  28. Crownhart, Casey (25 April 2024). "Hydrogen could be used for nearly everything. It probably shouldn't be". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
  29. Geuss, Megan (26 June 2019). "A 10-year-old natural gas plant in California gets the coal plant treatment". Ars Technica. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  30. Ram, R. Sree (28 June 2019). "Torrent Power shares make a powerful leap after Gujarat arrangement". mint. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  31. "Natural gas price plunge signals greener start for 2019 in U.S. and EU". www.worldoil.com. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
  32. Harrabin, Roger (7 October 2019). "UK overrules block on Drax power station plans". Retrieved 20 October 2019.

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:World topic