m Removing protection template from an unprotected page |
updated page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description| | {{Short description|Late 8th-century–1215 Iranian dynasty from Ghor, modern Afghanistan}} | ||
{{protection padlock|small=yes}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date= | {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2022}} | ||
{{Infobox country | {{Infobox country | ||
| conventional_long_name = Ghurid dynasty | | conventional_long_name = Ghurid dynasty | ||
| common_name = Ghurids | | common_name = Ghurids | ||
| year_start = | | native_name = {{lang|fa|دودمان غوریان}}<br/>''Dudmân-e Ğurīyân'' | ||
| year_start = 786 | |||
| year_end = 1215 | | year_end = 1215 | ||
| date_start = | | date_start = | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
| event_end = | | event_end = | ||
| p1 = Ghaznavids | | p1 = Ghaznavids | ||
| p2 = Seljuk Empire | |||
| p2 | |||
| p3 = Chahamanas of Shakambhari | | p3 = Chahamanas of Shakambhari | ||
| p4 = Gahadavala dynasty | | p4 = Gahadavala dynasty | ||
| s3 = Khalji dynasty of Bengal | | s3 = Khalji dynasty of Bengal | ||
| s4 = Delhi Sultanate | | s4 = Delhi Sultanate | ||
| s1 = Khwarazmian Empire | | s1 = Khwarazmian Empire | ||
| s5 = Qarlughids | | s5 = Qarlughids | ||
| image_map = | | image_map = {{Location map+ | ||
| | |Ghurids | ||
| width=300 <!-- DO NOT CHANGE MAP SIZE (300) AS THIS WILL DISPLACE THE LABELS --> | |||
| height = 300 | |||
| float = center | |||
| border =none | |||
| nodiv= 1 | mini= 1 | relief= yes | |||
| places = | |||
{{Annotation|265|05|[[Template:Continental Asia in 1100 CE|<span class="mw-no-invert" style="color:#4F311CFF">[</span>]][[AD 1200|<span class="mw-no-invert" style="color:#4F311CFF">1203</span>]][[Template:Continental Asia in 1300 CE|<span class="mw-no-invert" style="color:#4F311CFF">]</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=10|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|75|20|[[Khwarazmian Empire|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">KHWARAZMIAN<br>EMPIRE</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6.5|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|62|2|[[Kimek–Kipchak confederation|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">KIPCHAKS</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6.5|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|25|70|[[Abbasid Caliphate|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">ABBASID<br>CALIPHATE</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6.5|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|10|55|[[Zengids|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">ZENGIDS</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6.5|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|175|145|[[Seuna (Yadava) dynasty|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">YADAVAS</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6.5|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|170|118|[[Paramara dynasty|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">PARA-<br>MARAS</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|195|120|[[Chandelas of Jejakabhukti|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">CHANDElAS <br>OF JEJAKABHUKTI</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|260|30|[[Qocho|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">QOCHO</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6.5|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|140|10|[[Qara Khitai|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">QARA KHITAI</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=7|color=#000000}} | |||
{{Annotation|185|35|[[Kara-Khanid Khanate|<span style="color:#4F311CFF">KARA-<br>KHANIDS</span>]]|text-align=center|font-weight=bold|font-style=normal|font-size=6.5|color=#000000}} | |||
|caption= | |||
}} | |||
| image_map_caption = Map of Ghurid territory, before the assassination of [[Muhammad of Ghor]].<ref name="JS">{{cite book |last1=Schwartzberg |first1=Joseph E. |title=A Historical Atlas of South Asia |date=1978 |publisher=Oxford University Press, Digital South Asia Library|author-link=Joseph E. Schwartzberg |url=https://dsal.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/reference/schwartzberg/query.py?display_type=image_display&object=185#gsc.tab=0|page=147, Map "g"}}</ref>{{sfn|Eaton|2019|p=38}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bosworth |first1=C.E. |title=History of Civilizations of Central Asia |date=1 January 1998 |publisher=UNESCO |isbn=978-92-3-103467-1 |pages=432–433 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=18eABeokpjEC&pg=PA432 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
| image_flag = | | image_flag = | ||
| image_coat = | | image_coat = | ||
| coa_size = | | coa_size = | ||
| religion = {{small| | | religion = {{small|Before 1011''':'''}}<br />[[Paganism]]<ref>{{Cite book |last=Minorsky |first=Vladmir |title=Ḥudūd al-'Ālam, "The Regions of the World," |publisher=University Press, Oxford |year=1970 |isbn=9780906094037 |location=Leningrad |pages=110}}</ref><br />{{small|From 1011''':'''}}<br />[[Sunni Islam]]<ref name="Nizami178">''The Ghurids'', K.A. Nizami, ''History of Civilizations of Central Asia'', Vol.4, Part 1, ed. M.S. Asimov and C.E. Bosworth, (Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1999), 178.</ref>{{efn|See [[#Religion And Creed|religion and creed]]. Initially, the Ghurids adopted Karramism, but later under [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]] shifted to the [[Shafi'i school]] and [[Ash'arism]], while [[Muhammad of Ghor]] shifted to the [[Hanafi school]] and [[Maturidism]].}} | ||
| capital = [[Firozkoh]]{{sfn|Auer|2021|p=6}}<br/>[[Herat]]<ref name="Heratcapital"/><br/>[[Ghazni]] <small>(1170s–1215)</small><ref name="Ghazcapital"/> | | capital = [[Firozkoh]]{{sfn|Auer|2021|p=6}}<br/>[[Herat]]<ref name="Heratcapital">[https://latrobe.academia.edu/DavidThomas/Papers/107251/Firuzkuh_the_summer_capital_of_the_Ghurids Firuzkuh: the summer capital of the Ghurids] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120406170937/http://latrobe.academia.edu/DavidThomas/Papers/107251/Firuzkuh_the_summer_capital_of_the_Ghurids |date=6 April 2012 }}, by David Thomas, p. 18.</ref><br/>[[Ghazni]] <small>(1170s–1215)</small><ref name="Ghazcapital">''The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-volume set'', by Jonathan Bloom, Sheila Blair, p. 108.</ref> | ||
| government_type = [[Hereditary monarchy]] | | government_type = [[Hereditary monarchy]]<br>[[Diarchy]] (1173–1206) | ||
| legislature = | | legislature = | ||
| title_leader = Malik/Sultan | | title_leader = Malik/Sultan | ||
| leader1 = | | leader1 = Amir Banji <small>(first)</small> | ||
| leader2 = [[ | | leader2 = [[Zia al-Din Ali]] <small>(last)</small> | ||
| year_leader1 = | | year_leader1 = 8th-century | ||
| year_leader2 = 1214–1215 | | year_leader2 = 1214–1215 | ||
| year_deputy1 = | | year_deputy1 = | ||
| stat_year1 = 1200 est. | | stat_year1 = 1200 est. | ||
| stat_area1 = 2000000 | | stat_area1 = 2000000 | ||
| ref_area1 = <ref name="OxfordArea">{{Cite book|last1=Bang|first1=Peter Fibiger|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9mkLEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA92|title=The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume One: The Imperial Experience|last2=Bayly|first2=C. A.|last3=Scheidel|first3=Walter|date=2020 | | ref_area1 = <ref name="OxfordArea">{{Cite book|last1=Bang|first1=Peter Fibiger|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9mkLEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA92|title=The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume One: The Imperial Experience|last2=Bayly|first2=C. A.|last3=Scheidel|first3=Walter|date=2020|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-977311-4|pages=92–94|language=en}}</ref> | ||
| common_languages = [[Persian language|Persian]] <small>(court, literature)</small><ref>''The Development of Persian Culture under the Early Ghaznavids'', C.E. Bosworth, '''Iran''', Vol. 6, (1968), 35;;"Like the Ghaznavids whom they supplanted, the Ghurids had their court poets, and these wrote in '''Persian'''"</ref>{{sfn|O'Neal|2015}} | | common_languages = [[Persian language|Persian]] <small>(court, literature)</small><ref>''The Development of Persian Culture under the Early Ghaznavids'', C.E. Bosworth, '''Iran''', Vol. 6, (1968), 35;;"Like the Ghaznavids whom they supplanted, the Ghurids had their court poets, and these wrote in '''Persian'''"</ref>{{sfn|O'Neal|2015}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Ghurid dynasty''' (also spelled '''Ghorids'''; {{ | The '''Ghurid dynasty''' (also spelled '''Ghorids'''; {{langx|fa|دودمان غوریان|translit=Dudmân-e Ğurīyân}}; self-designation: {{langx|fa|شنسبانی|translit=Šansabānī}}) was a culturally [[Persianate]] dynasty of eastern [[Iranian peoples|Iranian]] [[Tajik people|Tajik]] origin, which ruled from the 8th-century in the region of [[Ghor]], and became an Empire from 1175 to 1215.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Barisitz |first1=Stephan |title=Central Asia and the Silk Road: Economic Rise and Decline over Several Millennia |date= 2017 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-319-51213-6 |page=94 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DLPDDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA94 |language=en}}</ref> The Ghurids were centered in the hills of the Ghor region in the present-day central [[Afghanistan]], where they initially started out as local chiefs. They gradually converted to [[Sunni Islam]] after the conquest of Ghor by the [[Ghaznavid]] ruler [[Mahmud of Ghazni]] in 1011. The Ghurids eventually overran the Ghaznavids when [[Muhammad of Ghor]] [[Siege of Lahore (1186)|seized Lahore]] and expelled the Ghaznavids from their last stronghold. | ||
The Ghurids initially ruled as vassals of the Ghaznavids and later of the [[Seljuk Empire|Seljuk]]s. However, during the early 12th-century the long-standing rivalry between the Seljuks and Ghaznavids created a power vacuum in eastern Afghanistan and [[Punjab|Panjab]] which the Ghurids took advantage of and began their territorial expansion. [[Ala al-Din Husayn]] ended the Ghurid subordination to the Ghaznavids, ruthlessly sacking their capital, although he was soon defeated by the Seljuks after he stopped paying tribute to them. The Seljuk imperial power, however, was itself swept away in eastern Iran with the contemporaneous advent of the [[Khwarazmian Empire]]. | |||
During the [[dyarchy]] of the Ala al-Din Husayn nephews – [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]] and Muhammad of Ghor, the Ghurid empire reached its greatest territorial extent, holding encompassed territory from eastern [[Iran]] through easternmost [[India]]. While Ghiyath al-Din was occupied with the Ghurid expansion in the west, his junior partner in the dyarchy, Muhammad of Ghor and his lieutenants [[Indian campaigns of Muhammad of Ghor|were active east]] of the [[Indus Valley]] as far as [[Bengal]] and eventually succeeded in conquering wide swaths of the [[Indo-Gangetic Plain|Gangetic Plain]], while in the west under Ghiyath al-Din, engaging in a protracted duel with the [[Khwarazmian Empire|Shahs of Khwarazm]], the Ghurids, reached as far as [[Gorgan]] (present-day Iran) on the shoreline of the [[Caspian Sea]], albeit for a short time. | |||
Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad died in 1203 of illness caused due to [[rheumatic disorders]] and soon after the Ghurids suffered a crushing defeat against the Khwrezmians aided by timely reinforcements from the [[Qara Khitai]]s in the [[Battle of Andkhud]] in 1204. Muhammad [[Muhammad of Ghor#Assassination|was assassinated]] soon after in March 1206 which ended the Ghurid influence in [[Khurasan]]. The dynasty became extinguished all together within a decade when [[Muhammad II of Khwarezm|Shah Muhammad II]] uprooted the Ghurids in 1215. Their conquests in the [[Indian subcontinent]] nevertheless survived for several centuries under the evolving [[Delhi Sultanate]] established by [[Qutb ud-Din Aibak]]. | |||
==Origins== | ==Origins== | ||
In the 19th century some European scholars, such as [[Mountstuart Elphinstone]], favoured the idea that the Ghurid dynasty was related to today's [[Pashtun people]]<ref>[[Mountstuart Elphinstone|Elphinstone, Mountstuart]]. The History of India. Vol. 1. J. Murray, 1841. Web. 29 | [[File:Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad. AH 599-602 AD 1171-1206.jpg|thumb|300px|Gold Dinar of [[Muhammad of Ghor]], dated AH 601 (1204/5 CE), struck in [[Ghazni]].]] | ||
In the 19th century some European scholars, such as [[Mountstuart Elphinstone]], favoured the idea that the Ghurid dynasty was related to today's [[Pashtun people]]<ref>[[Mountstuart Elphinstone|Elphinstone, Mountstuart]]. The History of India. Vol. 1. J. Murray, 1841. Web. 29 April 2010. [https://books.google.com/books?id=oAluAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA598 Link]: ''"...the prevalent and apparently the correct opinion is, that both they and their subjects were Afghans. "'' & ''"In the time of Sultan Mahmud it was held, as has been observed, by a prince whom Ferishta calls Mohammed Soory (or Sur) Afghan."'' pp. 598–599</ref><ref>A short history of India: and of the frontier states of Afghanistan, Nipal, and Burma, [http://janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id=EAD%2FGBR%2F0115%2FY3022M Wheeler, James Talboys] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070609112709/http://janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id=EAD%2FGBR%2F0115%2FY3022M |date=9 June 2007 }}, ([https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.96740/page/n105 <!-- pg=77 quote=afghan ghori. --> LINK]): ''"The next conqueror after Mahmud who made a name in India, was Muhammad Ghori, the Afghan."''</ref><ref>[[Edward Balfour|Balfour, Edward]]. The Cyclopædia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia, Commercial Industrial, and Scientific: Products of the Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1885. Web. 29 April 2010. [https://books.google.com/books?id=3U0OAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA392 Link]: ''"IZ-ud-DIN Husain, the founder of the Ghori dynasty, was a native of Afghanistan. The origin of the house of Ghor has, however, been much discussed, – the prevailing opinion being that both they and their subjects were an Afghan race. "'' p. 392</ref> but this is generally rejected by modern scholarship.<ref name=EofI-Afghanistan>{{cite encyclopedia |author1=M. Longworth Dames |author2=G. Morgenstierne |author3=R. Ghirshman |title = AF<u>GH</u>ĀNISTĀN| encyclopedia = [[Encyclopaedia of Islam]]| edition = CD-ROM Edition v. 1.0| publisher = Koninklijke Brill NV| location = Leiden, The Netherlands| year = 1999 | quote=''"... there is no evidence for assuming that the inhabitants of Ghūr were originally Pashto-speaking (cf. Dames, in E I1). If we are to believe the Paṭa Khazāna (see below, iii), the legendary Amīr Karōṝ, grandson of Shansab, (8th century) was a Pashto poet, but this for various reasons is very improbable ..."''}}</ref> Contemporary scholars state that the dynasty was of [[Tajik people|Tajik]] origin.<ref name="RE">{{Cite book |author=[[Richard M. Eaton|Richard Eaton]]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tLXXAAAAMAAJ&q=Rajputs |title=Essays on Islam and Indian History |date=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press|page=100|quote=The dynamics of north Indian politics changed dramatically, however, when the Ghurids, a dynasty of Tajik (eastern Iranian), origin arrived from central Afghanistan towards the end of twelfth century|isbn=978-0-19-565114-0|language=en}}</ref><ref>[[Encyclopaedia of Islam]], "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: ''"... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the <u>Gh</u>ūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."''</ref>{{sfn|Wink|2020|p=78}}<ref>Cynthia Talbot, ''The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj Chauhan and the Indian Past, 1200–2000'', (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 36.</ref>{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr B. |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date=2018 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-18074-8 |page=92 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8MhJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA92 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Routledge">{{cite book |last1=Avari |first1=Burjor |title=Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-58061-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hGHpVtQ8eKoC&pg=PA41 |language=en|page=41}}</ref> Later, due to intermarrying, the Ghurid princes were distinguished by their significant blending of Tajik, [[Persians|Persian]], [[Turkic peoples|Turkic]], and native [[Afghan (ethnonym)|Afghan]] ethnicities.<ref name="Routledge"/> | |||
''[[Encyclopædia Iranica]]'' states: "Nor do we know anything about the ethnic stock of the Ḡūrīs in general and the Šansabānīs in particular; we can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks".{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b}} [[Clifford Edmund Bosworth|Bosworth]] further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, ''Āl-e Šansab'' (Persianized: ''Šansabānī''), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally [[Middle Persian language|Middle Persian]] name ''Wišnasp''.{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b}} | |||
[[File:Afghanistan Ghor Province location.PNG|thumb|left|200px|The Ghurids originated from [[Ghor Province]] in central [[Afghanistan]].]] | [[File:Afghanistan Ghor Province location.PNG|thumb|left|200px|The Ghurids originated from [[Ghor Province]] in central [[Afghanistan]].]] | ||
Historian [[André Wink]] explains in ''[[The New Cambridge History of Islam]]'':<ref name="New Cambridge">{{New Cambridge History of Islam|volume=3|last=Wink|first=André|author-link=André Wink|chapter=The early expansion of Islam in India|page=96}}</ref>{{blockquote|The Shansabānī dynasty superseded the Ghaznavids in the second half of the twelfth century. This dynasty was not of [[Turkic peoples|Turkish]], nor even [[Afghan (ethnonym)|Afghan]], but of eastern Persian or Tājīk origin, speaking a distinct Persian dialect of its own, like the rest of the inhabitants of the remote and isolated mountain region of Ghūr and its capital of Fīrūzkūh (in what is now central Afghanistan).}} | |||
When the Ghurids started to distinguish themselves through their conquests, courtiers and genealogists (such as [[Fakhr-i Mudabbir]] and [[Minhaj-i-Siraj|al-Juzjani]]) forged a fictive genealogy which connected the Ghurids with the Iranian past. They traced the Ghurid family back to the mythical Arab tyrant [[Zahhak]], mentioned in the medieval Persian epic {{lang|fa|[[Shahnameh]]}} ("The Book of Kings"), | When the Ghurids started to distinguish themselves through their conquests, courtiers and genealogists (such as [[Fakhr-i Mudabbir]] and [[Minhaj-i-Siraj|al-Juzjani]]) forged a fictive genealogy which connected the Ghurids with the Iranian past. They traced the Ghurid family back to the mythical Arab tyrant [[Zahhak]], mentioned in the medieval Persian epic {{lang|fa|[[Shahnameh]]}} ("The Book of Kings"), whose family had reportedly settled in Ghur after the Iranian hero [[Fereydun]] had ended Zahhak's thousand-year tyranny.{{sfn|O'Neal|2015}}{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b}} | ||
Additionally, nothing is known of the pre-Islamic religious beliefs of the Ghurids.{{sfn|O'Neal|2015}} | |||
===Language=== | ===Language=== | ||
The Ghurids' native language was apparently different from their court language, Persian. [[Abu'l-Fadl Bayhaqi]], the famous historian of the Ghaznavid era, wrote on page 117 in his book ''[[Tarikh-i Bayhaqi]]'': "Sultan [[Mas'ud I of Ghazni]] left for Ghoristan and sent his learned companion with two people from Ghor as interpreters between this person and the people of that region." However, like the [[Samanids]] and Ghaznavids, the Ghurids were great patrons of [[Persian literature]], [[Persian poetry|poetry]], and [[Persian culture|culture]], and promoted these in their courts as their own. Modern-day authors refer to them as the "[[Persianization|Persianized]] Ghurids".<ref name="Persianate">{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date= | The Ghurids' native language was apparently different from their court language, Persian. [[Abu'l-Fadl Bayhaqi]], the famous historian of the Ghaznavid era, wrote on page 117 in his book ''[[Tarikh-i Bayhaqi]]'': "Sultan [[Mas'ud I of Ghazni]] left for Ghoristan and sent his learned companion with two people from Ghor as interpreters between this person and the people of that region." However, like the [[Samanids]] and Ghaznavids, the Ghurids were great patrons of [[Persian literature]], [[Persian poetry|poetry]], and [[Persian culture|culture]], and promoted these in their courts as their own. Modern-day authors refer to them as the "[[Persianization|Persianized]] Ghurids".<ref name="Persianate">{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date=2009 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-12594-7 |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OLNE_li8C10C&pg=PA3 |language=en}}</ref> Wink describes the tongue of the Ghurids as a "distinct Persian dialect".<ref name="New Cambridge"/> | ||
There is nothing to confirm the recent conclusion that the inhabitants of Ghor were originally [[Pashto language|Pashto-speaking]], and claims of the existence of "[[Pashto poetry]]", such as [[Pata Khazana]], from the Ghurid period are unsubstantiated.<ref>[[Encyclopaedia of Islam]], "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: ''"... There is nothing to confirm the recent surmise that the <u>Gh</u>ūids were Pa<u>sh</u>to-speaking [...] the Paṭa Khazāna "Treasury of secrets", claims to include Pa<u>sh</u>to poetry from the <u>Gh</u>ūid period, but the significance of this work has not yet been evaluated ..."''</ref><ref name="EofI-Afghanistan"/> | There is nothing to confirm the recent conclusion that the inhabitants of Ghor were originally [[Pashto language|Pashto-speaking]], and claims of the existence of "[[Pashto poetry]]", such as [[Pata Khazana]], from the Ghurid period are unsubstantiated.<ref>[[Encyclopaedia of Islam]], "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: ''"... There is nothing to confirm the recent surmise that the <u>Gh</u>ūids were Pa<u>sh</u>to-speaking [...] the Paṭa Khazāna "Treasury of secrets", claims to include Pa<u>sh</u>to poetry from the <u>Gh</u>ūid period, but the significance of this work has not yet been evaluated ..."''</ref><ref name="EofI-Afghanistan"/> | ||
=== Extent === | |||
In the west, Ghurid territory extended to [[Nishapur]] and [[Merv]],{{sfn|Thomas|2018|loc=p. 26, Figure I:2}}<ref name="KS">{{cite book |last1=Schmidt |first1=Karl J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BqdzCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA37 |title=An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History |publisher=Routledge |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-317-47681-8 |page=37, Map 16.2 |language=en}}</ref> while Ghurid troops reached as far as [[Gorgan]] on the shores of the [[Caspian Sea]].<ref name="a">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=18eABeokpjEC&pg=PA185 |title=History of Civilizations of Central Asia |date=1998 |publisher=UNESCO |isbn=978-92-3-103467-1 |language=en |quote="In 1201 Ghurid troops entered Khurasan and captured Nishapur, Merv, Sarakhs and Tus, reaching as far as Gurgan and Bistam. Kuhistan, a stronghold of the Ismailis, was plundered and all Khurasan was brought temporarily under Ghurid control"}}</ref>{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b}} Eastward, the Ghurids invaded as far as [[Bengal]].<ref name="THC">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ml75DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA237 |title=Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections |date=2020 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-43736-4 |page=237 |language=en |quote="In 1205, Bakhtīyar Khilji sacked Nudiya, the pre-eminent city of western Bengal and established an Islamic government at Laukhnauti, the capital of the predecessor Sena dynasty. On this occasion, commemorative coins were struck in gold and silver in the name of Muhammad b. Sām"}}</ref> | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
===Early history=== | ===Early history=== | ||
{{multiple image|perrow=2|total_width= | {{multiple image|perrow=2|total_width=400|caption_align=center | ||
| align = right | | align = right | ||
| direction =horizontal | | direction =horizontal | ||
| Line 85: | Line 103: | ||
}} | }} | ||
A certain Ghurid prince named Amir Banji was the ruler of [[Ghor]] and ancestor of the medieval Ghurid rulers. His rule was legitimized by the [[Abbasid]] [[caliph]] [[Harun al-Rashid]]. | A certain Ghurid prince named Amir Banji was the ruler of [[Ghor]] and ancestor of the medieval Ghurid rulers. His rule was legitimized by the [[Abbasid]] [[caliph]] [[Harun al-Rashid]]. | ||
Before the mid-12th century, the Ghurids had been bound to the [[Ghaznavids]] and [[Seljuq dynasty|Seljuks]] for about 150 years. Beginning in the mid-12th century, Ghor expressed its independence from the Ghaznavid Empire. In 1149 the Ghaznavid ruler [[Bahram-Shah of Ghazna]] poisoned a local Ghurid leader, Qutb al-Din Muhammad, who had taken refuge in the city of [[Ghazni]] after having a quarrel with his brother [[Sayf al-Din Suri]]. In revenge, Sayf marched towards Ghazni and defeated Bahram-Shah. However, one year later, Bahram returned and scored a decisive victory against Sayf, who was shortly captured and crucified at Pul-i Yak Taq. [[Baha al-Din Sam I]], another brother of Sayf, set out to avenge the death of his two brothers, but died of natural causes before he could reach Ghazni. | Before the mid-12th century, the Ghurids had been bound to the [[Ghaznavids]] and [[Seljuq dynasty|Seljuks]] for about 150 years. Beginning in the mid-12th century, Ghor expressed its independence from the Ghaznavid Empire. The early Ghurids followed [[Paganism]] before being converted to Islam by [[Abu Ali ibn Muhammad]].{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b}} In 1149 the Ghaznavid ruler [[Bahram-Shah of Ghazna]] poisoned a local Ghurid leader, Qutb al-Din Muhammad, who had taken refuge in the city of [[Ghazni]] after having a quarrel with his brother [[Sayf al-Din Suri]]. In revenge, Sayf marched towards Ghazni and defeated Bahram-Shah. However, one year later, Bahram returned and scored a decisive victory against Sayf, who was shortly captured and crucified at Pul-i Yak Taq. [[Baha al-Din Sam I]], another brother of Sayf, set out to avenge the death of his two brothers, but died of natural causes before he could reach Ghazni. | ||
In 1152, Ala al-Din Husayn refused to pay tribute to the [[Great Seljuk Empire|Seljuks]] and instead marched an army from Firozkoh but was defeated and captured at Nab by [[Ahmad Sanjar|Sultan Ahmed Sanjar]]. | [[Ala al-Din Husayn]] (1149–61), one of the youngest of Sayf's brothers and newly crowned Ghurid king, also set out to avenge the death of his two brothers. He managed to defeat Bahram-Shah, and then had Ghazni sacked; the city burned for seven days and seven nights. He also sacked the Ghaznavid fortresses and palaces of [[Lashkari Bazar|Bost]].<ref name="op">{{cite web |title=Encyclopaedia Iranica (Ghurids) |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ghurids |website=iranicaonline.org |quote=Ḡazna and Bost suffered frightful sackings by ʿAlāʾ-al-Dīn Ḥosayn, in which colleges and libraries were despoiled, and the buildings of previous sultans destroyed (Jūzjānī, pp. 343–345; Čahār maqāla, ed. Qazvīnī, p. 31), earning him the uneviable epithet of Jahānsūz (world incendiary). }}</ref> These actions earned him the title of ''Jahānsūz'', meaning "''the world burner"''.{{sfn|Bosworth|2001a|pp=578–583}} The Ghaznavids retook the city with [[Ahmed Sanjar|Seljuq]] help, but later lost it to [[Oghuz Turks]].{{sfn|Bosworth|2001a|pp=578–583}} | ||
In 1152, Ala al-Din Husayn refused to pay tribute to the [[Great Seljuk Empire|Seljuks]] and instead marched an army from Firozkoh but was defeated and captured at Nab in the Harīrūd Valley by [[Ahmad Sanjar|Sultan Ahmed Sanjar]] after his forces defected to the Seljuqs.{{sfn|Wink|1991|page=136}} During the battle, 6000 nomads from Ala al-Din's forces went over to the Seljuk army. Despite relatively smaller size of both armies, the defection of nomads at critical point of the battle eventually decided the issue in favour of the Seljuks.{{sfn|Thomas|2018|page=55}} Ala al-Din Husayn remained a prisoner for two years, until he was released in return for a heavy ransom to the Seljuqs and was allowed to reclaim his principality in Ghor. However, Sanjar was soon captured and imprisoned by the Ghuzz nomads in 1153, which allowed the Ghurids to expand their polity again.{{sfn|Thomas|2018|page=56}} Meanwhile, a rival of Ala al-Din named Husayn ibn Nasir al-Din Muhammad al-Madini had seized [[Firozkoh]], but was murdered at the right moment when Ala al-Din returned to reclaim his ancestral domain. Ala al-Din spent the rest of his reign expanding the domains of his kingdom; he managed to conquer Garchistan, [[Tukharistan]], [[Zamindawar]], Bust, [[Bamiyan]] and other parts of Khurasan. Ala al-Din died in 1161, and was succeeded by his son [[Sayf al-Din Muhammad]], who died two years later in a battle against the [[Oghuz Turks]] of [[Balkh]].{{sfn|Wink|1991|page=138}} | |||
During the reign of Ala ad-Din, the Ghurids firmly established themselves at [[Firuzkuh]] and made it their capital, at the same time, the minor branches of the family who were the offshoot of concubinage with [[Turkish people|Turkish]] slave girls whom chronicler Juzjani called "Kanizak-i-turki" established themselves in [[Bamiyan]] and elsewhere.{{sfn|Wink|1991|pages=136–137}} | |||
===The Ghurids at their zenith=== | ===The Ghurids at their zenith=== | ||
[[File:Fortress and arch of Qala-e-Bost on Afghan banknote.jpg|thumb|271px|Fortress and Ghurid arch of [[Qala-e-Bost]] as printed on an Afghan banknote.]] | [[File:Fortress and arch of Qala-e-Bost on Afghan banknote.jpg|thumb|271px|Fortress and Ghurid arch of [[Qala-e-Bost]] as printed on an Afghan banknote.]] | ||
Sayf al-Din Muhammad was succeeded by his cousin [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]], who was the son of Baha al-Din Sam I, and proved himself to be a capable king. Right after Ghiyath's ascension, he, with the aid of his loyal brother [[ | Sayf al-Din Muhammad was succeeded by his cousin [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]], who was the son of Baha al-Din Sam I, and proved himself to be a capable king. Right after Ghiyath's ascension, he, with the aid of his loyal brother [[Muhammad of Ghor]] (later known as "Shihabuddin Ghuri"), killed a rival Ghurid chief named Abu'l Abbas. Ghiyath then defeated his uncle Fakhr al-Din Masud who claimed the Ghurid throne and had allied with the Seljuq governor of Herat and Balkh.{{sfn|Bosworth|1968|p=163}} | ||
In 1173, Muhammad of Ghor after multiple attempts reconquered the city of Ghazni from the [[Ghuzz Turks]], who had deposed the [[Ghaznavids]] from there earlier.{{sfn|Wink|1991|page=138}} In 1175, the Ghurids took control of [[Herat]] from the Seljuks, and the city became one of their main power bases and centers of cultural development, together with [[Firozkoh]] and Ghazni.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval 'Hindu-Muslim' Encounter |date=2022 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-3324-5 |page=105 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vUZpEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA105 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Princeton University Press">{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval 'Hindu-Muslim' Encounter |date= 2022 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-3324-5 |page=90 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vUZpEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA90 |language=en}}</ref> They also took control of the areas of [[Nīmrūz]] and [[Sīstān]], and extended their suzerainty as far as the Seljuks of [[Kerman]].<ref name="EBEI">{{cite web |last1=Bosworth |first1=Edmond |title=Encyclopaedia Iranica (Ghurids) |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ghurids |website=iranicaonline.org| quote=In the west, Ḡīāṯ-al-Dīn, often in concert with his brother, extended his suzerainty over the maleks of Nīmrūz or Sīstān and even over the Kermān branch of the Saljuqs.}}</ref> | |||
====Ghurid conquest of Khorasan==== | |||
{{Main|Ghurid conquest of Khorasan}} | |||
Afterwards, Muhammad assisted his brother Ghiyath in his contest with the [[Khwarezmid Empire|Khwarezmian Empire]], who were at times supported by their "pagan" suzerains the [[Qara Khitai]], for the lordship of [[Greater Khorasan|Khorasan]].<ref name="XX"/> Seljuk power in Khorasan had collapsed since the defeat of [[Ahmad Sanjar]] against the [[Oghuz Turks|Ghuzz Turks]] in 1153, which left the region at the hands of the Turkmen.<ref>{{cite book |title=Encyclopaedia Iranica, Ghurids |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ghurids |quote=ʿAlāʾ-al-Dīn Ḥosayn's expansionist policies raised the Ghurids into a power of significance well beyond Ḡūr itself. Latterly, he was able to take advantage of a certain power-vacuum in the eastern Islamic world which had arisen through the decay of the Ghaznavids and the collapse of Saljuq power in Khorasan consequent on Sanjar's defeat and capture by the Ḡozz (q.v.) in 548/1153.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Encyclopedia Iranica, Sanjar |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/sanjar |website=iranicaonline.org}}</ref> In 1181, [[Sultan Shah of Khwarezm|Sultan Shah]], a pretendent to the Khwarezmian throne, managed to take control of Khorasan, until 1192 when he was defeated near [[Merv]] by the Ghurids, who captured his territories.<ref name="XX">{{cite book |title=Encyclopaedia Iranica, Ghurids |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ghurids |quote=The actual fighting in Khorasan at this time was largely between the Ghurids and Tekeš’s brother Solṭānšāh, who had carved out for himself personally a principality in western Khorasan, until in 586/1190. Ḡīāṯ-al–Dīn and Moʿezz-al-Dīn defeated Solṭānšāh near Marv in 588/1192, captured him, and took over his territories (Jūzjānī, I, 303–304, tr. I, pp. 246–247). When Tekeš died in 596/1200 (Ebn al-Aṯīr, Beirut, XII, pp. 156–158), Ḡīāṯ-al-Dīn was able to take over most of the towns of Khorasan as far west as Besṭām in Qūmes.}}</ref> The Ghurids then took control of all Khorasan following the death of his successor [[Ala al-Din Tekish|Tekish]] in 1200, capturing [[Nishapur]] in 1200, and reaching as far as [[Bastam|Besṭām]] in the ancient region of Qūmes.<ref name="XX"/><ref name="Princeton University Press"/> | |||
After the death of his brother Ghiyath on 13 March 1203,<ref>{{Cite book |author=Mohammad Habib|author-link=Mohammad Habib|chapter=The Asiatic Environment |editor1=Mohammad Habib |editor2=Khaliq Ahmad Nizami |title=A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526) |volume=5 |edition=Second |year=1992 |publisher=The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_9cmAQAAMAAJ |page=44|quote=At this juncture Sultan Ghiyasuddin Ghuri died at Herat on 27 Jamadi I.A H 599 (13 March A.D 1203)|oclc=31870180}}</ref> Muhammad became the successor of his empire and ruled until his assassination in 1206 near [[Jhelum]] by [[Isma'ilism|Ismāʿīlīs]] whom he persecuted during his lifetime.{{sfn|Bosworth|1968|p=168}}<ref>{{harvnb|Chandra|2007|page=73}}:"Muizzuddin led his last campaign into India in 1206 in order to deal with the Khokhar rebellion. He resorted to large-scale slaughter of the Khokhars and cowed them down. On his way back to Ghazni, he was killed by a Muslim fanatic belonging to a rival sect"</ref> | |||
====Conquest of India (1175 to 1206)==== | |||
{{Main|Indian campaigns of Muhammad of Ghor}} | |||
[[File:The last stand of Rajputs against Muhammadans.jpg|thumb|290px|''The last stand of Rajputs'', depicting the [[Second Battle of Tarain]] in 1192]] | |||
{{South Asia in 1175|right|{{center|Main South Asian polities in 1175, on the eve of the [[Ghurid Empire]] invasion of the subcontinent (orange line: Ghurid territorial conquests from 1175 to 1205).<ref>{{cite book |last1=Schwartzberg |first1=Joseph E. |title=A Historical atlas of South Asia |date=1978 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |pages=37, 147 |isbn=0226742210 |url=https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=074 |archive-date=6 February 2022 |access-date=15 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220206065357/https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/pager.html?object=074 |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{sfn|Eaton|2019|p=38}}}}|{{location map~ |South Asia |lat=31|N |long=68|E |label=|position=|label_size=|mark=Chess drt45.svg|marksize=35}}{{location map~ |South Asia |lat=25|N |long=75|E |label=|position=|label_size=|mark=Ghurid invasions in India (map overlay).png|marksize=225}}}} | |||
[[File:Bengal. Muhammad Bakhtiyar Khalji. 1204-1206.Struck in the name of Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad bin Sam, Dated Samvat 1262 (1204 AD).jpg|thumb|290px|[[Bengal]] coinage of Turkic general [[Bakhtiyar Khalji]] (1204–1206 CE). Struck in the name of Muhammad of Ghor, dated [[Samvat]] 1262 (1204 CE).<ref name="FBF">{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr B. |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date= 2018 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-18074-8 |pages=115–117 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8MhJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA116 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Goron |first1=Stan |last2=Goenka |first2=J. P. |last3=Robinson (numismatist.) |first3=Michael |title=The Coins of the Indian Sultanates: Covering the Area of Present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh |date=2001 |publisher=Munshiram Manoharlal |isbn=978-81-215-1010-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kE8aAAAAYAAJ |language=en|quote="Obverse: horseman to left holding a mace, margin with date in Nagari Samvat 1262 Bhadrapada . Reverse : legend in Nagari śrīmat mahamada sāmaḥ . Issued in AD 1204"}}</ref>]] | |||
On the eve of the Ghurid invasion of the subcontinent, northern India was ruled by many independent [[Rajput]] kings, often fighting with each other, such as the [[Chahamanas of Shakambhari|Chahamana]] ruler [[Prithviraja III]] in [[Delhi]] and [[Ajmer]], the [[Chaulukya dynasty|Chaulukya]] ruler [[Mularaja II]] in [[Gujarat]], the [[Gahadavala dynasty|Gahadavala]] ruler [[Jayachandra]] in [[Kanauj]],<ref>{{harvnb|Thapar|2004|pages=421, 433–434}}: "The campaigns saw Muhammad in control of Lahore and led to the visions of further conquests in India. An attack was launched on the Rajput kingdoms controlling the watershed and the western Ganges Plain, now beginning to be viewed as the frontier.."</ref> further in the east of Ganges Plain there were other independent [[Hindu]] powers such as the [[Sena dynasty|Sena]]'s under [[Lakshmana Sena|Lakshmana]] in [[Bengal]] etc.{{sfn|Thapar|2004|page=433}} | |||
Northern India and Bengal were conquered by [[Muhammad of Ghor]] during the period from 1175 to 1205, just before his death in 1206. His capital was in [[Ghazni]], while his elder brother [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]] with whom Muhammad ruled in a [[diarchy]], governed the western part of the empire from his capital at [[Firozkoh|Fīrōzkōh]].{{sfn|Wink|1991|page=139–140}}{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} In 1175, Muhammad crossed the [[Indus River]], approaching it through the [[Gomal Pass]] instead of [[Khyber Pass]], in order to outflank the Ghaznavids in [[Punjab|Panjab]]. Muhammad captured [[Multan]] from the [[Carmathians]], and also took [[Uch]] by 1176.{{sfn|Wink|1991|page=143}}{{sfn|Thapar|2004|page=434}} | |||
In 1178, he turned south and again marched through the [[Gomal Pass]], marching by the way of [[Multan]] and [[Uch]] to enter into the present-day [[Gujarat]] via [[Thar desert]], where his armies got exhausted in their long march from [[Ghazna]] and were routed in the [[Battle of Kasahrada]] fought near [[Mount Abu]] at Kasahrada in the southern [[Aravalli Range|Aravalli Hills]] by a coalition of Rajput chiefs, which forced him to change his route for further incursions into India.<ref>{{cite book |author=Asoke Kumar Majumdar |title=Chaulukyas of Gujarat |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ffAdAAAAMAAJ |publisher=Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan |year=1956 |oclc=4413150 |pages=131–132}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Chandra|2007|page=68}}: "In 1173, Shahabuddin, Muhammad (1173–1206 (also known as Muizzuddin Muhammad bin Sam) ascended the throne at Ghazni, while his elder brother was ruling at Ghur. Proceeding by way of the Gomal pass, Muizzuddin Muhammad conquered Multan and Uchch. In 1178, he attempted to penetrate into Gujarat by marching across the Rajputana desert. But the Gujarat ruler completely routed him in a battle near Mount Abu, and Muizzuddin Muhammad was lucky in escaping alive. He now realised the necessity of creating a suitable base in the Punjab before venturing upon the conquest of India. Accordingly he launched a campaign against the Ghaznavid possessions in the Punjab. By 1190, Muizzuddin Muhammad had conquered Peshawar, Lahore and Sialkot, and was poised for a thrust towards Delhi and the Gangetic doab"</ref> Afterwards, Muhammad pressed upon the Ghanzavids, whose domain was considerably truncated, though they were still controlling parts of Punjab and Pakistan down to the valley of Kabul which were of strategic importance in the pathway to northern India.{{sfn|Bosworth|1977|page=129}} Thus by the turn of next decade, Muhammad conquered [[Sindh]],{{sfn|Thapar|2004|page=434}} [[Peshawar]], [[Sialkot]] and annexed the last Ghaznavid principality in [[Punjab]], with their capital in [[Lahore]], in [[Siege of Lahore (1186)|1186]] through stratagem after three incursions.{{sfn|Wink|1991|page=144}}{{sfn|Bosworth|2001a}}<ref name="RME">{{cite book |last1=Eaton |first1=Richard M. |title=The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760 |date=1993 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley · Los Angeles · London |page=Chapter 1–2 |url=https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft067n99v9&chunk.id=ch02&toc.depth=1&toc.id=ch02&brand=ucpress}}</ref> | |||
[[ | |||
In | In 1191, the Ghurids seized [[Bathinda]] and marched towards [[Delhi]], but were defeated in the [[First Battle of Tarain]] by the [[Rajput|Rajput confederacy]] led by the [[Chahamanas of Shakambhari|Ajmer-Chahamana]] king [[Prithviraja III]]. Nevertheless, Muhammad returned a year later with an army of Turkish mounted archers and routed the Rajput forces in the [[Second Battle of Tarain]], and executed Prithviraja shortly afterwards.<ref>{{cite book |author1=Hermann Kulke |author1-link=Hermann Kulke |author2=Dietmar Rothermund |author2-link=Dietmar Rothermund|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TPVq3ykHyH4C|title=A History of India|date=2004|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-415-32919-4|language=en|page=167|quote="The first battle of Tarain was won by the Rajput confederacy led by Prithviraj Chauhan of Ajmer. But when Muhammad of Ghur returned the following year with 10,000 archers on horseback he vanquished Prithviraj and his army}}</ref>{{sfn|Thapar|2004|pages=434–435}} [[Govindaraja IV]], son of Prithviraj Chauhan, submitted to the Ghurids the region of [[Ajmer]], which became a vassal state.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jayapalan |first1=N. |title=History of India |date=2001 |publisher=Atlantic Publishers & Distri |isbn=978-81-7156-928-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6L6avTlqJNYC&pg=PA2 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Jayapalan">{{cite book |last1=Jayapalan |first1=N. |title=History of India |date=2001 |publisher=Atlantic Publishers & Distri |isbn=978-81-7156-928-1 |pages=1–3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6L6avTlqJNYC&pg=PA1 |language=en}}</ref> In 1193, [[Delhi]] was conquered by Muhammad of Ghor's general [[Qutbu l-Din Aibak]].<ref name="RME"/>{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} The newly conquered territories were then put under the governorship of Qutb ud-Din Aibak, who was now Viceroy in Delhi.<ref name="KN116"/><ref>{{cite book |last1=Jayapalan |first1=N. |title=History of India |date=2001 |publisher=Atlantic Publishers & Distri |isbn=978-81-7156-928-1 |page=2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6L6avTlqJNYC&pg=PA2 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
In | In 1194, Muhammad returned to India and crossed the [[Yamuna River]] with an army of 50,000 horses and at the [[Battle of Chandawar]] defeated the forces of the [[Gahadavala dynasty|Gahadavala]] king [[Jayachandra]], who was killed in action. After the battle, Muhammad continued his advance to the east, with his general [[Qutb ud-Din Aibak]] in the vanguard. The city of [[Benares]] (Kashi) was taken and razed, and "idols in a thousand temples" were destroyed.<ref>{{harvnb|Chandra|2007|page=71}}: "In 1194, Muizzuddin returned to India. He crossed the Jamuna with 50,000 cavalry and moved towards Kanauj. A hotly contested battle between Muizzuddin and Jaichandra was fought at Chandawar near Kanauj. We are told that Jaichandra had almost carried the day when he was killed by an arrow, and his army was totally defeated. Muizzuddin now moved on to Banaras which was ravaged, a large number of temples there being destroyed"</ref><ref name="KN116">{{cite book|author=[[Mohammad Habib]]|editor=[[K. A. Nizami]]|title=Politics And Society During The Early Medieval Period Vol. 2 |date=1981 |publisher=People's Publishing House |page=116 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.99172/page/n145/mode/2up|quote=In the winter of A.D. 1194–1195 Shihabuddin once more marched into Hindustan and invaded the doab. Rai Jaichand moved forward to meet him....then description of Chandwar struggle (...) Shihabuddin captured the treasure fort of Asni and then proceeded to Benaras, 'where he converted about thousand idol-temples into house for the Musalmans.}}</ref><ref name="Asher11">{{cite book |last1=Asher |first1=Frederick M. |title=Sarnath: A Critical History of the Place Where Buddhism Began |date= 2020 |publisher=Getty Publications |isbn=978-1-60606-616-4 |page=11 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JMHEDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA11 |language=en|quote=And then, in 1193, Qutb-ud-din Aibek, the military commander of Muhammad of Ghor's army, marched towards Varanasi, where he is said to have destroyed idols in a thousand temples. Sarnath very likely was among the casualties of this invasion, one all too often seen as a Muslim invasion whose primary purpose was iconoclasm. It was of course, like any premodern military invasion, intended to acquire land and wealth}}</ref> It is generally thought that the Buddhist city of [[Sarnath]] was also ravaged at that time.<ref name="Asher11"/><ref name="Asher74">{{cite book |last1=Asher |first1=Frederick M. |title=Sarnath: A Critical History of the Place Where Buddhism Began |date= 2020 |publisher=Getty Publications |isbn=978-1-60606-616-4 |page=74 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JMHEDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA74 |language=en}}</ref> In 1196, Qutb ud-Din Aibak vanquished Sulakshanapala, the ruler of the [[Kachchhapaghata dynasty]] of [[Gwalior]], capturing [[Gwalior fort]].<ref name="Jaya3">{{cite book |last1=Jayapalan |first1=N. |title=History of India |date=2001 |publisher=Atlantic Publishers & Distri |isbn=978-81-7156-928-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6L6avTlqJNYC&pg=PA3 |language=en}}</ref> Also in 1196, Qutb ud-Din Aibak [[Battle of Kasahrada (1197)|vanquished]] a coalition of the [[Rajputs]] of [[Ajmer]] and the [[Chaulukya dynasty|Chaulukyas]] under king [[Bhima II]] at [[Mount Abu]], thereafter sacking [[Anhilwara]].<ref name="Jaya3"/> | ||
In | [[File:Ghurid Tyrant in a Village, from a copy of the Bustan of Sa‘di. Mandu, c. 1500, for Nasir al-Din Khalji (1500–1510 Sultan of Malwa). Delhi, National Museum of India, 48.6 H.-4, folio 48a (Ghurid tyrant detail).jpg|thumb|left|upright|Indian depiction of a "Ghurid tyrant". Copy of the ''[[Bustan (book)|Bustan]]'' of [[Saadi Shirazi|Sa‘di]] (1257), made in [[Mandu, Madhya Pradesh|Mandu]], [[Malwa Sultanate]], India, c. 1500]] | ||
In 1202–1203 CE, Qutbu l-Din Aibak, now Ghurid governor of [[Delhi]], invaded the [[Chandelas of Jejakabhukti|Chandela kingdom]] in the [[Ganges Valley]].{{sfn|Sisirkumar Mitra|1977|pp=123–126}} The Ghurids toppled local dynasties and destroyed Hindu temples during their advance across northern India, in place constructing [[mosque]]s on the same sites.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} The revenue and booty gained after sacking the [[Hindu]] temples fuelled the efforts of Muhammad to finance his imperial aspirations in the west.{{sfn|Thapar|2004|pages=434, 436}} | |||
Around 1203, [[Bakhtiyar Khalji]], another [[Khalaj people|Turkic]] general of | Around 1203, [[Bakhtiyar Khalji]], another [[Khalaj people|Turkic]] general of Muhammad of Ghor, swept down the lower [[Indo-Gangetic Plain|Gangetic Plain]] and into [[Bengal]]. In Bihar, he is said to have destroyed Buddhist centers of learning such as [[Nalanda|Nalanda University]], greatly contributing to the decline of pre-Islamic Indic scholarship.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Roy |first1=Himanshu |title=Political Thought in Indic Civilization |date=2021 |publisher=Sage Publishing India |isbn=978-93-5479-159-8 |page=6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rAVBEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA6 |language=en|quote="After the arrival of Islam, the universities such as Nalanda and Vikramshila were no longer existent. The destruction of Nalanda by Bakhtiyar Khalji was the last nail in this pre-Islamic Indic university, which had survived three major destructions"}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Koh |first1=Tommy |last2=Singh |first2=Hernaikh |title=India on Our Minds: Essays by Tharman Shanmugaratnam and 50 Singaporean Friends of India |date= 2020 |publisher=World Scientific |isbn=978-981-12-2453-9 |page=91 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M5wPEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA91 |language=en}}</ref> In Bengal, he sacked the ancient city of [[Nudiya]] in central Bengal, and established an Islamic government in the former [[Sena Empire|Sena]] capital of [[Gauḍa (city)|Lakhnauti]] in 1205.<ref name="THCI">{{cite book |title=Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections |date= 2020 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-43736-4 |page=237 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ml75DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA237 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Majumdar |first=R. C. |year=1973 |title=History of Mediaeval Bengal |location=Calcutta |publisher=G. Bharadwaj & Co. |oclc=1031074 |pages=1–2 |quote=Tradition gives him credit for the conquest of Bengal but as a matter of fact he could not subjugate the greater part of Bengal ... All that Bakhtyār can justly take credit for is that by his conquest of Western and a part of Northern Bengal he laid the foundation of the Muslim State in Bengal. The historians of the 13th century never attributed the conquest of the whole of Bengal to Bakhtyār.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Mehta |first1=Jaswant Lal |year=1986 |orig-year=First published 1979 |title=Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iUk5k5AN54sC&pg=PA81 |volume=I |edition=2nd |publisher=Sterling Publishers |isbn=978-81-207-0617-0 |oclc=883279992 |pages=81–82 |quote=The Turkish arms penetrated into Bihar and Bengal, through the enterprising efforts of Ikhtiyaruddin Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji ... he started plundering raids into Bihar and, within four or five years, occupied a large part of it ... Nadia was sacked by the Turks and a few districts of Bengal (Malda, Dinajpur, Murshidabad and Birbhum) were occupied by them ... Bathtiyar Khalji could not retain his hold over Nadia and made Lakhnauti or Gaur as his capital.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DnZuAAAAMAAJ&q=Bakhtiyar+Khalji+bengal+and+bihar|title=India and the Afghans: A study of a neglected region, 1370–1576 A.D |isbn=9788185078687 |last1=Thakur |first1=Amrendra Kumar | year=1992| page=148|publisher=Janaki Prakashan }}</ref> | ||
Muhammad placed his faithful Turkic generals, rather than his own Ghurid brethens, in position of authority over local tributary kings, throughout the conquered Indian lands.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} After the assassination of Muhammad in March 1206, his territories fragmented into smaller Sultanates led by his former [[Mamluk]] generals. [[Tajuddin Elduz]] became the ruler of [[Ghazni]], [[Nasir-ud-Din Qabacha]] became Sultan of [[Multan]], [[Bahauddin Tughril]] became Sultan of [[Bayana]] and [[Qutb al-Din Aibak]] became Sultan of [[Delhi]].<ref>{{cite book |author=K. A. Nizami |author-link=K. A. Nizami |chapter=The Early Turkish Sultans of Delhi |editor1=Mohammad Habib |editor2=Khaliq Ahmad Nizami |title=A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526) |volume=5 |edition=Second |year=1992 |publisher=The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_9cmAQAAMAAJ |oclc=31870180 |page=201}}</ref> [[Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khilji|Bakhtiyar Khilji]] became Sultan of [[Bengal]], but was soon assassinated and succeeded by several [[Khalji dynasty of Bengal|Khalji rulers]], until Bengal was incorporated into the [[Delhi]] Sultanate in 1227.<ref>{{cite book | first1=George F. | last1=Nafziger | first2=Mark W. | last2=Walton | title=Islam at War: A History | url=https://archive.org/details/islamatwarhistor0000nafz | url-access=registration | publisher=Praeger Publishers | year=2003 | page=[https://archive.org/details/islamatwarhistor0000nafz/page/56 56]| isbn=9780275981013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Chandra |first1=Satish |author-link=Satish Chandra (historian)|title=Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206–1526) – Part One |date=2004 |publisher=Har-Anand Publications |isbn=978-81-241-1064-5 |pages=43–44 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L5eFzeyjBTQC&pg=PA43 |language=en}}</ref> Between 1206 and 1228 the various Turkic rulers and their successors rivaled for preeminence until the Sultan of Delhi [[Iltutmish]] prevailed, marking the advent of the [[Mamluk dynasty (Delhi)|Mamluk dynasty]]. This was the first dynasty of the [[Delhi Sultanate]], which in total had five dynasties and would rule most of India for more than three centuries until the advent of the [[Mughal Empire]] in 1526.{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} | |||
===Decline and fall=== | ===Decline and fall=== | ||
{{Main|Battle of Andkhud}} | |||
{{See also|Battle of Jhelum (1206)}} | |||
{{Continental Asia in 1210 CE|right|The Ghurids and contemporary Asian polities {{circa}} 1215||Map of the Ghurid Empire in 1215.png}} | |||
[[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad|Ghiyath]] died on 13 March 1203 due to [[gout]]{{sfn|Bosworth|1968|page=164}} and was succeeded by Muhammad of Ghor as the sole ruler of the vast Ghurid Empire. Soon after, [[Muhammad II of Khwarazm|Alauddin Khwarazm Shah]] besieged and captured some of the strongholds of the Ghurids around [[Merv]], although Muhammad drove him back and further besieged their capital [[Konye-Urgench|Gurgānj]].<ref name="Sicker103"/> | |||
Alauddin then appealed to his nominal suzerain the [[Qara-Khitai]], who dispatched a large contingent led by [[Yelü Zhilugu]].<ref name="Sicker103"/> In the ensuing [[Battle of Andkhud]] (1204), fought near the river Oxus, the Ghurid troops were completely routed by the combined forces of the [[Qara-Khitai]] and the [[Khwarizmian Empire|Khwarizmians]].<ref name="Sicker103"/> The defeat at Andkhud was a watershed for the Ghurids who lost their control over most of the [[Khurasan]]. Notwithstanding, Muhammad within a year or so raised a vast army and build bridge across the Oxus to launch a full-scale invasion of [[Transoxiana]] to avenge his defeat. However, he was forced to move towards Punjab to crush a [[Khokhar]] rebellion whom he [[Battle of Jhelum (1206)|defeated and massacred]] in large number. On his way back, Muhammad of Ghor was assassinated near the Indus on March 15, 1206.<ref>{{Cite book |author=Satish Chandra|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L5eFzeyjBTQC |title=Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206–1526) – Part One |date=2004 |publisher=Har-Anand Publications |isbn=978-81-241-1064-5 |page=29|language=en}}</ref>{{sfn|Bosworth|1968|page=165}} | |||
After the death of Muhammad Ghori in 1206, a confused struggle then ensued among the remaining Ghūrid leaders and the [[Khwarazmian Empire|Khwarezmians]]. The Khwarezmians under [[Muhammad II of Khwarazm|Ala al-Din Muhammad]] captured [[Herat]] and [[Ghor]] in 1206, and finally [[Ghazni]] in 1215, completing the takeover of the western part of the Ghūrid empire.<ref name="Sicker103">{{cite book |last1=Sicker |first1=Martin |title=The Islamic World in Ascendancy: From the Arab Conquests to the Siege of Vienna |year=2000 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-0-313-00111-6 |page=103 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b6vOEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA103 |language=en}}</ref>{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=39–45}} The Ghurid capital was transferred to [[Delhi]], recognizing Khwarazmian rule on north and central [[Afghanistan]]. The Ghurids continued their rule on much of the [[Indian subcontinent]], [[Sistan and Baluchestan Province|Sisitan]] region of [[Iran]] and south of [[Afghanistan]].<ref>Ira M. Lapidus, A History of Islamic Societies 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press 2002</ref> Though the Ghūrids' empire was short-lived, Muhammad of Ghor's conquests strengthened the foundations of Muslim rule in India. | |||
== | ==Religion And Creed== | ||
The Ghurids were great patrons of [[Persian culture]] and [[Persian literature|literature]] and | The Ghurids positioned themselves as defenders of [[Sunnism]]. They had good relations with the [[Abbasids]] in [[Baghdad]], who urged them to repel the advances of the [[Khwarazmian Empire|Kwarizmians]] into western Persia.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Bosworth |first1=Edmond |title=Encyclopaedia Iranica (Ghurids) |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ghurids |website=iranicaonline.org |quote=The Ghurids adopted the role of defenders of Sunnism. They had cordial relations with the ʿAbbasids in Baghdad, frequently exchanging embassies (Jūzjānī’s father took part in one of the last, Jūzjānī, I, p. 361, tr. p. 383). Ḡīāṯ-al-Dīn was admitted to al-Nāṣer's fotūwa order, and the caliph more than once urged the Ghurids to halt the advance into western Persia of the Ḵᵛārazmšāhs (Jūzjānī, I, 302, tr. I, p. 243).}}</ref> Their conquests in India were also presented as a battle between the armies of Islam (''lashkar-i Islam'') and the armies of the unbelievers (''lashkar-i kuffar''), and gave them great prestige in the Islamic world as defenders of the orthodoxy.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval 'Hindu-Muslim' Encounter |date=2022 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-3324-5 |page=106 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vUZpEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA106 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
It is said that the brothers Ghiyath al-Din and Mu'izz al-Din were raised as Karramites and initially adhered to the doctrines of that sect. Later, however, Ghiyath abandoned Karramism and adopted the Shafi'i school, a shift that caused significant tensions among the various branches of the Ghūrid dynasty. Bosworth wrote in 1968 that the Ghurid rulers abandoned their support for the Karramiyya and began following the Shafi'i school, "with its greater prestige and intellectual reputation." Their turn toward Ash'arism was closely connected to this shift, as attraction to Ash'ari theology and Shafi'i jurisprudence generally went hand in hand.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Formation of Post-Classical Philosophy in Islam|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kc0vEAAAQBAJ&dq=The+attraction+to+Ash%27arism+and+Shafi%27ism+went+hand+in+hand+with+a+desire+to+follow+the+Abbasid&pg=PA59|publisher=Oxford University Press|date=2021-06-08|isbn=978-0-19-088634-9|language=en|first=Frank|last=Griffel|pages=59}}</ref> The alliance with the caliphate reinforced the Shafiʿi school of thought and likely contributed to the growing influence of [[Ash'arism|Ash'ari]] theology in the Ghurid lands as well.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Formation of Post-Classical Philosophy in Islam|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kc0vEAAAQBAJ&dq=Ash%27arism+Ghurid&pg=PA290|publisher=Oxford University Press|date=2021-06-08|isbn=978-0-19-088634-9|language=en|first=Frank|last=Griffel|pages=290}}</ref> | |||
The Ghurid ruler appointed the [[Ash'arism|Ash'ari]] scholar Fakhr al-Din al-Razi to a high-ranking and well-paid governmental post, relieving his personal and financial difficulties.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Muslim 100: The Lives, Thoughts and Achievements of the Most Influential Muslims in History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4z49BAAAQBAJ&dq=Ash%27arism+Ghurid&pg=PA285|publisher=Kube Publishing Ltd|date=2009-09-01|isbn=978-1-84774-029-8|language=en|first=Muhammad|last=Khan|pages=285}}</ref> Ghiyath al-Din also commissioned the construction of a madrasa in Herat for him.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Muqarnas: An Annual on the Visual Culture of the Islamic World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UJc2u33fCKQC&dq=Al+Razi+Ghurid&pg=PA13|publisher=BRILL|date=2002-01-01|isbn=978-90-04-12593-3|language=en|first=Gülru|last=Necipoğlu|pages=13}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=تاريخ أبي الفداء 1-2 المسمى المختصر في أخبار البشر ج2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s11wDwAAQBAJ&q=%D9%81%D8%AE%D8%B1+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%86+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%8A+%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83+%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85|publisher=Dar Al Kotob Al Ilmiyah دار الكتب العلمية|date=1997-01-01|language=ar|first=أبو الفداء/الملك المؤيد|last=إسماعيل|pages=185|trans-title=Imam Fakhr al-Din Muhammad ibn Umar ibn Husayn al-Razi had come to Ghiyath al-Din, who had shown him great honor and respect, and had built a madrasa for him in Herat near the mosque. This greatly angered the Karramiyya.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Tārīḫ al-Kāmil|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CO2m0J4d0RYC&q=%D9%81%D8%AE%D8%B1+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%86+%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF+%D8%A8%D9%86+%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%B1+%D8%A8%D9%86+%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%86+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%8A+%D9%85%D9%84%D9%83+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%BA%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9|publisher=S. t.|date=1890|language=ar|first=ʻIzz-ad-Dīn Abu-'l-Ḥasan ʻAlī|last=Ibn-al-At̲īr|pages=59|trans-title=In this year, a great discord arose in the army of Ghiyath al-Din, the king of Ghor and Ghazni, at Firuzkuh. Both the common people and the kings and princes were involved. The cause was that Fakhr Muhammad ibn Umar ibn al-Husayn al-Razi, the renowned imam and Shafi'i jurist, had come to Ghiyath al-Din from Manar, sent by Baha' al-Din Sam, the ruler of Bamiyan, who was Ghiyath al-Din's maternal uncle. Ghiyath al-Din honored him, treated him with great respect, and built for him a madrasa in Bahārā near the mosque. Scholars from various regions came to him, and this greatly impressed and pleased many in Bahārā.}}</ref> The Ghurids promoted the study of Ilm al-Kalām (Islamic speculative theology), actively supporting scholars who engaged in theological inquiry and debate. In this spirit, they appointed Fakhr al-Din al-Razi as Malik al-Kalām, effectively making him the chief of speculative theology.<ref name=":1" /> This reflects the close ties Ghurids held with Ash'ari scholars, also demonstrating their support for Ash'ari theological stances. | |||
Like other Ghurids, Mu'izz al-Din of Ghor moved away from Karramism. However, unlike some of his contemporaries who leaned toward the Shafi'i school of thought, he aligned himself with the Hanafi school, which was dominant in Ghazni.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vUZpEAAAQBAJ|publisher=Princeton University Press|date=2022-07-12|isbn=978-1-4008-3324-5|language=en|first=Finbarr Barry|last=Flood|pages=101}}</ref> Consequently, he is likely to have endorsed the views of Hanafi Maturidi scholars, thereby identifying with the Māturīdī creed rather than the Ash'ari.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Muqarnas: An Annual on the Visual Culture of the Islamic World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UJc2u33fCKQC&dq=Al+Razi+Ghurid&pg=PA13|publisher=BRILL|date=2002-01-01|isbn=978-90-04-12593-3|language=en|first=Gülru|last=Necipoğlu|pages=16}}</ref> | |||
==Culture== | |||
[[File:Jam afghan architecture brick decor ghor province.jpg|thumb|Ornamental bands on the [[Minaret of Jam]], bearing the [[Sura 19|19th Sura]] of the [[Koran]].]] | |||
The Ghurids were great patrons of [[Persian culture]] and [[Persian literature|literature]]. The ''[[Čahār maqāla]]'', a work of Persian prose, was written by the poet [[Nizami Aruzi]] and dedicated to prince Abu’l-Ḥasan Ḥosām-al-Dīn ʿAlī.{{sfn|Yūsofī|2015}} | |||
Ghurid contributions laid the basis for a [[Persianization|Persianized]] state in the [[Indian subcontinent]].{{sfn|Bosworth|2001b}}<ref>''Persian Literature in the Safavid Period'', Z. Safa, The Cambridge history of Iran: The Timurid and Safavid periods, Vol. 6, Ed. Peter Jackson and Laurence Lockhart,(Cambridge University Press, 1986), 951; "''...Ghurids and Ghurid mamluks, all of whom established centres in India where poets and writers received ample encouragement.''".</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Patel |first1=Alka (University of California) |title=The Coming of the Mongols |date= 2017 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-78673-383-2 |pages=19–25 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gbqKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA19 |language=en}}</ref> However, most of the literature produced during the Ghurid era has been lost. They also transferred [[Iranian architecture|Persian architecture]] to India.{{sfn|Hambly|Asher|1994|pp=242–250}} According to [[Amir Khusrau]] (died 1325), the Indians learned Persian because of the influence of the "Ghurids and Turks."{{sfn|Auer|2021|p=30}} The notion of Persian kingship served as the basis for the imperial formation, political and cultural unity of the Ghurids.{{sfn|Auer|2021|p=12}} | |||
Out of the Ghurid state grew the [[Delhi Sultanate]] which established the Persian language as the official court language of the region – a status it retained until the late [[Mughal Empire|Mughal era]] in the 19th century. | Out of the Ghurid state grew the [[Delhi Sultanate]] which established the Persian language as the official court language of the region – a status it retained until the late [[Mughal Empire|Mughal era]] in the 19th century. | ||
| Line 122: | Line 177: | ||
There was a strong Turkic presence among the Ghurids, since Turk slave-soldiers formed the vanguard of the Ghurid armies.<ref name="BA41"/> There was intense amalgamation between these various ethnic groups: "a notable admixture of Tajik, Persian, Turkish and indigenous Afghan ethnicities therefore characterized the Shansabanis".<ref name="BA41">{{cite book |last1=Avari |first1=Burjor |title=Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-58061-8 |page=41 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hGHpVtQ8eKoC&pg=PA41 |language=en}}</ref> At least until the end of the 13th century when they ruled the [[Mamluk dynasty (Delhi)|Mamluk Sultanate]] in India, the Turks in the Ghurid realm maintained their ethnical characteristics, continuing to use Turkish as their main language, rather than Persian, and persisting in their rude and bellicose ways as "men of the sword", in opposition to the Persian "men of the pen".{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=48–49}} | There was a strong Turkic presence among the Ghurids, since Turk slave-soldiers formed the vanguard of the Ghurid armies.<ref name="BA41"/> There was intense amalgamation between these various ethnic groups: "a notable admixture of Tajik, Persian, Turkish and indigenous Afghan ethnicities therefore characterized the Shansabanis".<ref name="BA41">{{cite book |last1=Avari |first1=Burjor |title=Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-58061-8 |page=41 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hGHpVtQ8eKoC&pg=PA41 |language=en}}</ref> At least until the end of the 13th century when they ruled the [[Mamluk dynasty (Delhi)|Mamluk Sultanate]] in India, the Turks in the Ghurid realm maintained their ethnical characteristics, continuing to use Turkish as their main language, rather than Persian, and persisting in their rude and bellicose ways as "men of the sword", in opposition to the Persian "men of the pen".{{sfn|Eaton|2019|pp=48–49}} | ||
<gallery | <gallery> | ||
File:Cheheltan-chisht.-2.jpg|The two [[mausoleum]]s of [[Chisht]] (the western was built in 1167) | File:Cheheltan-chisht.-2.jpg|The two [[mausoleum]]s of [[Chisht]] (the western was built in 1167) | ||
File:Cheheltan-chisht.-1.jpg|The eastern mausoleum of Chisht (built in 1194) | File:Cheheltan-chisht.-1.jpg|The eastern mausoleum of Chisht (built in 1194) | ||
File:Shah-i Mashhad-1.jpg|Ruins of the ''Shah-i Mashhad'' [[madrasa]] (built in 1176) | File:Shah-i Mashhad-1.jpg|Ruins of the ''Shah-i Mashhad'' [[madrasa]] (built in 1176) | ||
File:Ghurid arch of Qala-e-Bost.jpg|Ghurid arch in [[Qala-e-Bost]] | File:Ghurid arch of Qala-e-Bost.jpg|Ghurid arch in [[Qala-e-Bost]] | ||
File:Great Mosque of Herat. Brick iwan with remains of Ghurid inscriptions. 1200-1201 CE (corrected for perspective).jpg|[[Great Mosque of Herat]]: Ghurid entrance (''[[iwan]]'') with remains of Ghurid inscriptions. 1200–1201 CE.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Flood |first1=Finbarr Barry |title=Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter |date=2022 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-3324-5 |pages=105–106 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vUZpEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA106 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
File:Friday Mosque keyhole arch (Ghaznavid style).jpg|Friday Mosque keyhole arch (Ghaznavid style) | |||
File:Friday Mosque, Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, interior of portal.jpg|[[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad|Ghiyath al-Din]] mausoleum, interior of portal | |||
File:Friday Mosque, Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, kufic inscriptions.jpg|Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, kufic inscriptions | |||
File:Friday Mosque, Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, naskhi inscription.jpg|Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, naskhi inscription | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
===Metalwork of the Ghurid period=== | |||
[[File:Ewer in the name of Mahmud b. Muhammad al-Harawi Khurasan, Herat, dated A.H. Sha'ban 577 (December 10, 1181-January 7, 1182).jpg|thumb|Ewer inscribed in the name of Mahmud b. Muhammad al-Harawi Khurasan, at [[Herat]], and dated A.H. Sha'ban 577 (December 10, 1181–January 7, 1182). [[Georgian National Museum]]. Exhibit [[Commons:Category:Court and Cosmos: The Great Age of the Seljuqs|"''Court and Cosmos: The Great Age of the Seljuqs''"]] (2016), [[Metropolitan Museum of Art]].<ref name="SRC"/>]] | |||
An important metalwork school was located in [[Herat]] during the Ghurid period, following the conquest of the Seljuk city by the Ghurids in 1175.<ref name="FBF"/> In the Islamic world, [[Inlay|inlaid metalworking]], consisting of patterned silver inlays in a brass background, was first developed in the region of [[Khurasan]] in the 12th century, by silversmiths facing a shortage of silver.<ref name="Raby 2012">{{cite book |last1=Raby |first1=Julian |editor1-last=Porter |editor1-first=Venetia |editor2-last=Rosser-Owen |editor2-first=Mariam |title=Metalwork and Material Culture in the Islamic World |date=2012 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-0-85773-343-6 |url=https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/19550/fsg_Julian%20Raby_%202012%20Mosul_watermarked.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |access-date=18 November 2022 |chapter=The Principle of Parsimony and the Problem of the 'Mosul School of Metalwork' |pages=11–85}}</ref> By the mid-12th century, [[Herat]] in particular had already gained a reputation for its high-quality inlaid metalwork, with works such as the [[Bobrinski Bucket]] (dated inscription of 1163).<ref name="Raby 2012"/> | |||
A series of remarkable ewers is attributed to this Herat school of metalwork at the time of Ghurid rule, during the 1180–1200 period. One of them, now in the [[Georgian National Museum]], is marked with a poem in Persian which specifically records its manufacture in Herat in 1181–1182, and permits the attribution and dating of this group of ewers to 1180–1200 in Herat, at the time of Ghurid rule.<ref name="MET Ewer">{{cite web |title=Ewer |url=https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/450513 |website=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Met Ghurid">{{Cite web |title=Ewer |url=https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/450513 |access-date=2024-01-04 |website=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |language=en |quote=At the time that this ewer and the group of long-necked ewers to which it relates were produced, Herat was under the control of the Ghurids, not the Seljuqs, but evidence strongly suggests that these pieces were exported to centers in Seljuq Iran and elsewhere.}}</ref><ref name="SRC"/> | |||
{{blockquote|My ewer is the most beautiful ewer of all time. Who in this world has anything like this today? Everyone who has seen it has said it is very beautiful. No one has seen its equal, for it is unparalleled | |||
Look at the ewer from which spirit is born. It is the water of life that flows from it. Any stream that comes from it into the hand. Creates a new pleasure every moment | |||
Look at the ewer that is praised by everyone. It would be worthy of service to an honored person like you | |||
Every eye that sees it opens wide. And says that nothing could be better than this | |||
This water vessel is made in [[Herat]]. Who else could product anything like it (in the world)? Although the seven stars the Planets of the celestial sphere lift their heads high, May they look favorably upon him who produces such a ewer | |||
Mercy be on him who makes such a ewer. May he be given silver and gold for making it. May good fortune come to him and caress him in friendship. May affliction be removed and given to his enemies | |||
|Ewer in the name of Mahmud b. Muhammad al-Harawi Khurasan, Herat, dated A.H. Sha'ban 577 (December 10, 1181–January 7, 1182). Brass; raised, repousse, engraved, inlaid with copper and silver. [[Georgian National Museum]], Janashia Museum of Georgia, Tbilisi (19-2008;32).<ref>[https://64.media.tumblr.com/20d3d8b4809ab280c5f5faf156ce9155/28249581c1d7df84-7b/s1280x1920/ea99fb38d959b15d969bd2b609bdee6728afa06a.jpg Metropolitan Museum of Art notice]</ref><ref name="SRC">{{cite book |last1=Canby |first1=Sheila R. |last2=Beyazit |first2=Deniz |last3=Rugiadi |first3=Martina |last4=Peacock |first4=A. C. S. |title=Court and Cosmos: The Great Age of the Seljuqs |date= 2016 |publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art |isbn=978-1-58839-589-4 |page=155, item 85 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BPrjCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA155 |language=en}}</ref>}} | |||
The practice of inlaying "required relatively few tools" and the technique spread westward, perhaps by Khurasani artisans moving to other cities.<ref name="Raby 2012"/> By the turn of the 13th century, the silver-inlaid-brass technique had reached [[Mosul]] under the Turkic [[Zengid dynasty]] (area of modern [[Iraq]]).<ref name="Raby 2012"/> | |||
== Coinage == | |||
=== Overview === | |||
The Ghurid dynasty produced a wide variety of coinage, which indicates the administrative organization of the empire and expresses their imperial power. The presence of these Ghurid coins confirms their control over key cities such as [[Herat]], [[Balkh]], [[Bamyan|Bamiyan]], and [[Ghazni]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=O'Neal |first=Michael |title=Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference of Iranian Studies. Volume II: Studies on Iran and the Persianate World after Islam |publisher=State Hermitage Publishers |year=2020 |isbn=978-5-93572-911-0 |location=Saint Petersburg |pages=200–214 |language=en |chapter=Some New Numismatic Evidence for Ghurid History}}</ref> This evidence also offers clear data for identifying periods of territorial shift, and establishing the hierarchy between various leaders.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
=== Physical Characteristics === | |||
Ghurid coins were primarily made of two metals: Silver (Dirham) and Copper ([[Fals|Fulus]]). Gold coins were occasionally issued as well.<ref name=":6">Encyclopaedia of Islam Online. "Coinage." Edited by Kate Fleet, Gudrun Krämer, Denis Matringe, John Nawas, and Devin J. Stewart. Brill, 2007–present. Accessed 4 November 2025.</ref> The coins were generally epigraphic and non-pictorial, consisting of [[Arabic]] inscriptions in decorative [[Kufic]] or [[Naskh (script)|Naskh]] script in circular bands. These inscriptions would include the ruler's name and title(s), and would sometimes include verses from the [[Quran]] referencing divine help or victory.<ref>O’Neal, Michael. "Some New Numismatic Evidence for Ghurid History." ''Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference of Iranian Studies'' (2020): 207–210.</ref><ref>Flood, Finbarr Barry. "Islamic Identities and Islamic Art: Inscribing the Qur’an in Twelfth-Century Afghanistan." ''Studies in the History of Art'' 74 (2009): 94–96.</ref> This epigraphic design followed a long standing Islamic coinage tradition. This tradition was established during the [[Umayyad Caliphate|Umayyad]] period, they replaced figural imagery with Quranic text to show religious identity and their political authority.<ref name=":6" /> Continuing to use these designs connected them to Islamic artistic and religious traditions, while also reinforcing the dynasty's authority and religious devotion. | |||
=== Key Mints === | |||
[[File:Ghurids (Ghur & Ghazna). Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad. AH 558-599 AD 1163-1203. Baldat Herat mint. Dated AH 599 (AD 1202-3).jpg|thumb|Silver dirham of Ghiyāth al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Sām, Herat mint (c. 1202 CE), showing circular Kufic script typical of Ghurid coinage.]]Evidence of mint names and inscriptions have been used to identify several primary centers of Ghurid coin production. These include [[Herat]], [[Balkh]], [[Ghazni]], [[Bamyan|Bamiyan]], and [[Firuzkuh]].<ref name=":0" /> Each mint documents different stages in the dynasty's political geography. | |||
'''Herat''' was one of the earliest and most successful mints. It issued dirhams under [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad|Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad Ibn Sam]] when the city of Herat was conquered by the Ghurids in the middle of the twelfth century.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
'''Balkh''' coins date back to around 1190 and show periods of Ghurid control followed by non-Ghurid control, until around 1196 CE, which suggest the Ghurids had lost and recovered the city several times.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
'''Ghazni''' coin inscriptions identify [[Muhammad of Ghor|Muʿizz al-Dīn Muhammad Ibn Sam]], indicating his authority over eastern territories.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
[[File:Ghurids (Bamiyan). Baha' al-Din Sam. AH 588-602 AD 1192-1206. Wakhsh mint.jpg|thumb|Coin of Bahaʾ al-Din Sam struck at the Bamiyan–Wakhsh mint (AH 588–602 / AD 1192–1206).]] | |||
'''Bamiyan''' coins were produced under [[Baha al-Din Sam I|Bahāʾ al-Dīn Sām]] and represent a semi-autonomous branch of the Ghurid family that retained the right to produce coins under their own name while being subject to the authority of their Ghurid overlords.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
'''Fīrūzkūh''' was the capital of the Ghurid dynasty and this mint was probably used to produce ceremonial or high value coins.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
The different inscriptions across these mints indicate political changes. For example, coins from Herat and Balkh show patterns of loss and recovery. This reflects the varying levels of territorial control of the Ghurids.<ref name=":0" /> Therefore, coinage was not just about producing money, they also served as an administrative instrument and represented power. | |||
=== Legacy === | |||
The Ghurid dynasty had fallen by the early 13th century, but their influence on the Islamic monetary system remained strong. The early coins of the [[Delhi Sultanate]] followed the same Ghurid weight and inscription standards.<ref name=":0" />The Ghurid numismatic model became the basis for the developing Indo-Islamic coinage systems for centuries to follow. | |||
== Architecture == | |||
The region was split into numerous different political rules and they all had fortified palaces and towers. Each palace was used as a way to protect and defend its inhabitants.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |title=MWNF - Museum With No Frontiers |url=https://islamicart.museumwnf.org/dynasties/dynasty/62/en |access-date=2025-10-20 |website=islamicart.museumwnf.org}}</ref> Architecture was functional but also a way to display wealth and power. There are numerous examples of minarets, towers, and mosques constructed to commemorate victories. An example of this can be seen with the [[Minaret of Jam]], which is thought to be a monument built as a symbol of triumph.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Pinder-Wilson |first=Ralph |date=2001 |title=Ghaznavid and Ghūrid Minarets |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4300603 |journal=Iran |language=en |volume=39 |pages=155–186 |doi=10.2307/4300603|jstor=4300603 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> The Ghurid Architectural style did not fall under one label. It was not specifically Persian nor was it distinctly Islamic, but rather what is described as an imperial architectural culture, which features mosques, towers, and minarets.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last=Patel |first=Alka |date=2007 |title=Architectural Cultures and Empire: The Ghurids in Northern India (ca. 1192–1210) |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24049362 |journal=Bulletin of the Asia Institute |volume=21 |pages=35–60 |jstor=24049362 |issn=0890-4464}}</ref> The architectural productions of the Ghurid dynasty was heavily reused and reconfigured from later cultures to articulate new religious and political identities.<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal |last=Flood |first=Finbarr B. |date=2001 |title=Ghūrid Architecture in the Indus Valley: The Tomb of Shaykh Sādan Shahīd |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4629582 |journal=Ars Orientalis |volume=31 |pages=129–166 |jstor=4629582 |issn=0571-1371}}</ref> There are not many still standing, but the [[Minaret of Jam]] still exists today. | |||
==List of rulers== | ==List of rulers== | ||
| Line 136: | Line 243: | ||
! style="background:#f0dc88; width:17%;"| Personal Name | ! style="background:#f0dc88; width:17%;"| Personal Name | ||
! style="background:#f0dc88; width:7%;"| Reign | ! style="background:#f0dc88; width:7%;"| Reign | ||
|- | |||
| | |||
| style="text-align:center;"|''Amir''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|امیر}}</small> | |||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[Amir Banji]] <br /><small>{{Nastaliq|امیر سوری}}</small> | |||
| style="text-align:center;"|8th-century <br /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 191: | Line 303: | ||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[Ala al-Din Husayn]] <br /><small>{{Nastaliq|علاء الدین حسین}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"| [[Ala al-Din Husayn]] <br /><small>{{Nastaliq|علاء الدین حسین}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1149–1161 | | style="text-align:center;"|1149–1161 | ||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:center;" colspan=4|'''''As independent rulers''''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 197: | Line 312: | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1161–1163 | | style="text-align:center;"|1161–1163 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghurids (Ghur & Ghazna). Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad. AH 558-599 AD 1163-1203. Baldat Herat mint. Dated AH 599 (AD 1202-3).jpg|100px|Ghurids (Ghur & Ghazna). Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad. AH | | style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghurids (Ghur & Ghazna). Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad. AH 558-599 AD 1163-1203. Baldat Herat mint. Dated AH 599 (AD 1202-3).jpg|100px|Ghurids (Ghur & Ghazna). Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad. AH 558–599 AD 1163–1203. Baldat Herat mint. Dated AH 599 (AD 1202–3).]] | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan Abul-Fateh''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان ابوالفتح}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan Abul-Fateh''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان ابوالفتح}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]]<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|غیاث الدین محمد}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"| [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]]<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|غیاث الدین محمد}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1163–1203 | | style="text-align:center;"|1163–1203 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Mu'izz_al-Din_Muhammad._AH_599-602_AD_1171-1206.jpg|100px|Coin of [[ | | style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Mu'izz_al-Din_Muhammad._AH_599-602_AD_1171-1206.jpg|100px|Coin of [[Muhammad of Ghor]], AH 599–602 1171–1206 CE]] [[File:Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad bin Sam. AH 599-602 AD 1171-1206. Pagoda coin with. Lakshmi seated facing.jpg|100px|Indian coinage ([[Pagoda (coin)|Pagoda]]) of Muhammad of Ghor. ''Obverse'': [[Lakshmi]] seated facing. ''Reverse'': ''śri maha/[mi]ra mahama/da sama'' in [[Devanagari]].]] | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan Shahāb-ud-din Muhammad Ghori''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان شهاب الدین محمد غوری }}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan Shahāb-ud-din Muhammad Ghori''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان شهاب الدین محمد غوری }}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[ | | style="text-align:center;"| [[Muhammad of Ghor]]<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|معز الدین محمد}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1203–1206 | | style="text-align:center;"|1203–1206 | ||
| Line 210: | Line 325: | ||
| style="text-align:center;" colspan=4|'''''As vassals of the [[Khwarazmian Empire]]''''' | | style="text-align:center;" colspan=4|'''''As vassals of the [[Khwarazmian Empire]]''''' | ||
|- style="background:lightgreen" | |- style="background:lightgreen" | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud. AH 602-609 AD 1206-1212.jpg|100px|Coin of Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud. AH | | style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud. AH 602-609 AD 1206-1212.jpg|100px|Coin of Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud. AH 602–609 1206–1212 CE]] | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud]] <br /><small>{{Nastaliq|غیاث الدین محمود}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"| [[Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud]] <br /><small>{{Nastaliq|غیاث الدین محمود}}</small> | ||
| Line 227: | Line 342: | ||
| | | | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"|''Sultan''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|سلطان}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[Ala al-Din Ali]] <br /><small>{{Nastaliq|علاء الدین علی}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"| [[Zia al-Din Ali|Ala al-Din Ali]] <br /><small>{{Nastaliq|علاء الدین علی}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1214–1215 | | style="text-align:center;"|1214–1215 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=4 align=" | | colspan="4" align="center" | [[Khwarazmian dynasty|Khwarazmian]] conquest | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 239: | Line 354: | ||
! style="background:#f0dc88; width:17%;"| Personal Name | ! style="background:#f0dc88; width:17%;"| Personal Name | ||
! style="background:#f0dc88; width:7%;"| Reign | ! style="background:#f0dc88; width:7%;"| Reign | ||
|- | |||
| style="text-align:center;" colspan=4|'''''As independent rulers''''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 245: | Line 362: | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1152–1163 | | style="text-align:center;"|1152–1163 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghurids (Bamiyan). Shams al-Din Muhammad. AH 558-588 AD 1163-1192.jpg|100px|Ghurids (Bamiyan). Shams al-Din Muhammad. AH | | style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghurids (Bamiyan). Shams al-Din Muhammad. AH 558-588 AD 1163-1192.jpg|100px|Ghurids (Bamiyan). Shams al-Din Muhammad. AH 558–588 AD 1163–1192.]] | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|''Malik''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|ملک }}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"|''Malik''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|ملک }}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Masud]]<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|شمس الدین محمد بن مسعود}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"| [[Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Masud]]<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|شمس الدین محمد بن مسعود}}</small> | ||
| Line 255: | Line 372: | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1192 | | style="text-align:center;"|1192 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghurids (Bamiyan). Baha' al-Din Sam. AH 588-602 AD 1192-1206. Wakhsh mint.jpg|100px|Ghurids (Bamiyan). Baha' al-Din Sam. AH | | style="text-align:center;"|[[File:Ghurids (Bamiyan). Baha' al-Din Sam. AH 588-602 AD 1192-1206. Wakhsh mint.jpg|100px|Ghurids (Bamiyan). Baha' al-Din Sam. AH 588–602 AD 1192–1206. Wakhsh mint.]] | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|''Malik''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|ملک }}</small><br />''Abul-Mu'ayyid''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|ابوالمؤید}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"|''Malik''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|ملک }}</small><br />''Abul-Mu'ayyid''<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|ابوالمؤید}}</small> | ||
| style="text-align:center;"| [[Baha al-Din Sam II]]<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|بهاء الدین سام}}</small> | | style="text-align:center;"| [[Baha al-Din Sam II]]<br /><small>{{Nastaliq|بهاء الدین سام}}</small> | ||
| Line 268: | Line 385: | ||
| style="text-align:center;"|1206–1215 | | style="text-align:center;"|1206–1215 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=4 align=" | | colspan="4" align="center" | [[Khwarazmian dynasty|Khwarazmian]] conquest | ||
|} | |} | ||
*''Green shaded row signifies Ghurid vassalage under the [[Khwarazmian dynasty]].'' | *''Green shaded row signifies Ghurid vassalage under the [[Khwarazmian dynasty]].'' | ||
| Line 274: | Line 391: | ||
==Ghurid family tree== | ==Ghurid family tree== | ||
{{chart top| Ghurid dynasty family tree |width= | {{chart top| Ghurid dynasty family tree |width=100%|collapsed=yes}} | ||
{{Tree chart/start}} | {{Tree chart/start}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | SUR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SUR = [[Amir Suri]]<br />(9th-century-10th-century) | border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | SUR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SUR = [[Amir Suri]]<br />(9th-century-10th-century) | border=1}} | ||
| Line 280: | Line 397: | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | MIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MIS = [[Muhammad ibn Suri]]<br />(10th-century-1011) | border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | MIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MIS = [[Muhammad ibn Suri]]<br />(10th-century-1011) | border=1}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | |,|-|^|-|.| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | |,|-|^|-|.| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | AIM | | SIM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AIM = [[Abu Ali ibn Muhammad]]<br />(1011–1035) | SIM = [[Shith ibn Muhammad]] | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | AIM | | SIM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AIM = [[Abu Ali ibn Muhammad]]<br />(1011–1035) | SIM = [[Shith ibn Muhammad]] | border=1}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | AIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AIS = [[Abbas ibn Shith]]<br />(1035–1060) | border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | AIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AIS = [[Abbas ibn Shith]]<br />(1035–1060) | border=1}} | ||
| Line 296: | Line 413: | ||
{{Tree chart| | SAD | | | SHD | | | QAM | | | BAS | | NDM | | ALH | | | | | | | | FDM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SAD = [[Sayf al-Din Suri]]<br />(1146–1149) | SHD = [[Shuja al-Din Muhammad]] | QAM = [[Qutb al-Din Muhammad (Ghurid ruler)|Qutb al-Din Muhammad]] | BAS = [[Baha al-Din Sam I]]<br />(1149) | NDM = [[Nasir al-Din Muhammad Kharnak]] | ALH = [[Ala al-Din Husayn]]<br />(1149–1161) | FDM = [[Fakhr al-Din Masud]]<br />(1152–1163) | | | | | border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | SAD | | | SHD | | | QAM | | | BAS | | NDM | | ALH | | | | | | | | FDM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SAD = [[Sayf al-Din Suri]]<br />(1146–1149) | SHD = [[Shuja al-Din Muhammad]] | QAM = [[Qutb al-Din Muhammad (Ghurid ruler)|Qutb al-Din Muhammad]] | BAS = [[Baha al-Din Sam I]]<br />(1149) | NDM = [[Nasir al-Din Muhammad Kharnak]] | ALH = [[Ala al-Din Husayn]]<br />(1149–1161) | FDM = [[Fakhr al-Din Masud]]<br />(1152–1163) | | | | | border=1}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | | |!| border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | | |!| border=1}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | ALZ | | | | | |,|-|-|^|-|-|.| | | | |!| | | | | | | | | |!| | ALZ = [[Ala al-Din Ali]]<br />(1214–1215) | border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | ALZ | | | | | |,|-|-|^|-|-|.| | | | |!| | | | | | | | | |!| | ALZ = [[Zia al-Din Ali|Ala al-Din Ali]]<br />(1214–1215) | border=1}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | | | | GHI | | | | MUR | | | |!| | | | | | | | | SHÅ | | | | | | GHI = [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]]<br />(1163–1202) | MUR = [[ | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | | | | GHI | | | | MUR | | | |!| | | | | | | | | SHÅ | | | | | | GHI = [[Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad]]<br />(1163–1202) | MUR = [[Muhammad of Ghor]]<br />(1202–1206) | SHÅ = [[Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Masud|Shams al-Din Muhammad]]<br />(1163–1192) | border=1}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | |,|-|^|-|-|.| | | |,|-|-|^|-|-|.| | border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | |,|-|^|-|-|.| | | |,|-|-|^|-|-|.| | border=1}} | ||
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | SÆF | | | ATZ | | ÆBØ | | | | BAX | | SÆF = [[Sayf al-Din Muhammad]]<br />(1149–1157) | ATZ = [[Ala al-Din Atsiz]]<br />(1213–1214) | BAX = [[Baha al-Din Sam II]]<br />(1192–1206) | ÆBØ = [[Abbas ibn Muhammad]]<br />(1192) | border=1}} | {{Tree chart| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | | | | | | SÆF | | | ATZ | | ÆBØ | | | | BAX | | SÆF = [[Sayf al-Din Muhammad]]<br />(1149–1157) | ATZ = [[Ala al-Din Atsiz]]<br />(1213–1214) | BAX = [[Baha al-Din Sam II]]<br />(1192–1206) | ÆBØ = [[Abbas ibn Muhammad]]<br />(1192) | border=1}} | ||
| Line 309: | Line 426: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[History of Afghanistan]] | |||
* [[List of battles involving the Ghurid dynasty]] | * [[List of battles involving the Ghurid dynasty]] | ||
| Line 315: | Line 433: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist | {{sfn whitelist|CITEREFHamblyAsher1994}} | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
== | == Bibliography == | ||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Auer |first1=Blain |title=In the Mirror of Persian Kings: The Origins of Perso-Islamic Courts and Empires in India |date=2021 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1108832311}} | * {{cite book |last1=Auer |first1=Blain |title=In the Mirror of Persian Kings: The Origins of Perso-Islamic Courts and Empires in India |date=2021 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1108832311}} | ||
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=5|last=Bosworth|first=C. Edmund|authorlink=Clifford Edmund Bosworth|chapter=The Political and Dynastic History of the Iranian World (A.D. 1000–1217)|pages=1–202| | * {{Cite book |last=Bosworth |first=C. E.|author-link=C. E. Bosworth|url=https://archive.org/details/bosworth-1977-later-ghaznavids |title=The Later Ghaznavids; Splendour and Decay: The Dynasty in Afghanistan and Northern India 1040–1186 |date=1977 |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |isbn=978-0-85224-315-2 |language=en}} | ||
* {{cite encyclopedia | title = Ghaznavids | last = Bosworth | first = C. Edmund | url = https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ghaznavids | encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, Vol. X, Fasc. 6 | pages = 578–583 | location = New York | year = 2001a }} | * {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=5|last=Bosworth|first=C. Edmund|title=The Wikipedia Library |authorlink=Clifford Edmund Bosworth|chapter=The Political and Dynastic History of the Iranian World (A.D. 1000–1217)|pages=1–202|chapter-page=1}} {{Subscription required}} | ||
* {{cite encyclopedia | title = Ghaznavids | last = Bosworth | first = C. Edmund|author-link=C.E. Bosworth| url = https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ghaznavids | encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, Vol. X, Fasc. 6 | pages = 578–583 | location = New York | year = 2001a }} | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia | title = Ghurids | last = Bosworth | first = C. Edmund | url = https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ghurids | encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, Vol. X, Fasc. 6 | pages = 586–590 | location = New York | year = 2001b }} | * {{cite encyclopedia | title = Ghurids | last = Bosworth | first = C. Edmund | url = https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ghurids | encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, Vol. X, Fasc. 6 | pages = 586–590 | location = New York | year = 2001b }} | ||
* {{cite book |last=Bosworth |first=C.E. |title=Medieval Central Asia and the Persianate World: Iranian Tradition and Islamic Civilisation |editor-first1=A.C.S. |editor-last1=Peacock |editor-first2=D.G. |editor-last2=Tor |publisher=I.B. Tauris |year=2015 |chapter=The Ghurids in Khurasan }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Chandra |first=Satish |author-link=Satish Chandra (historian)|title=History of Medieval India:800–1700|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qHnHHwAACAAJ |year=2007|publisher=Orient Longman|isbn=978-81-250-3226-7}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Eaton |first1=Richard M. |authorlink=Richard M. Eaton|title=India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765 |date=2019 |publisher=Allen Lane |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aIF6DwAAQBAJ|isbn=978-0713995824}} | * {{cite book |last1=Eaton |first1=Richard M. |authorlink=Richard M. Eaton|title=India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765 |date=2019 |publisher=Allen Lane |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aIF6DwAAQBAJ|isbn=978-0713995824}} | ||
* {{cite book | last = Frye | first = R.N. | authorlink = Richard N. Frye | chapter = The Ghaznavids and Ghūrids | title = The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 5: The Iranian world | year = 1975 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | location=Cambridge | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=16yHq5v3QZAC | editor-first = R.N. | editor-last = Frye | isbn = 0-521-20093-8| pages=157–165}} | * {{cite book | last = Frye | first = R.N. | authorlink = Richard N. Frye | chapter = The Ghaznavids and Ghūrids | title = The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 5: The Iranian world | year = 1975 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | location=Cambridge | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=16yHq5v3QZAC | editor-first = R.N. | editor-last = Frye | isbn = 0-521-20093-8| pages=157–165}} | ||
| Line 329: | Line 452: | ||
* {{EI3|last=O'Neal|first=Michael|title=Ghūrids|year=2015|url=https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/*-COM_27477}} | * {{EI3|last=O'Neal|first=Michael|title=Ghūrids|year=2015|url=https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/*-COM_27477}} | ||
* {{cite book |author=Sisirkumar Mitra |title=The Early Rulers of Khajurāho |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=irHN2UA_Z7gC&pg=PA113 |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |year=1977 |isbn=9788120819979 }} | * {{cite book |author=Sisirkumar Mitra |title=The Early Rulers of Khajurāho |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=irHN2UA_Z7gC&pg=PA113 |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |year=1977 |isbn=9788120819979 }} | ||
* {{Cite book|last=Thapar|first=Romila|author-link=Romila Thapar|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i6cwDwAAQBAJ |title=Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300 |date=2004|publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-24225-8 |language=en}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Thomas|first=David|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6h2_DwAAQBAJ |title=The Ebb and Flow of the Ghūrid Empire|date=2018|publisher=Sydney University Press |isbn=978-1-74332-542-1|language=en}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Wink|first1=André|authorlink=André Wink|title=The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: c.700–1800 CE |date=2020 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uPXvDwAAQBAJ|isbn=978-1108417747}} | * {{cite book |last1=Wink|first1=André|authorlink=André Wink|title=The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: c.700–1800 CE |date=2020 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uPXvDwAAQBAJ|isbn=978-1108417747}} | ||
* {{ | * {{Cite book|last=Wink|first=Andre|author-link=Andre Wink|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=75FlxDhZWpwC |title=Al-Hind the Making of the Indo-Islamic World: The Slave Kings and the Islamic Conquest : 11th–13th Centuries |date=1991 |publisher=BRILL| isbn=9004102361 }} | ||
* {{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia Iranica |title=ČAHĀR MAQĀLA |first=Ḡolām-Ḥosayn |last=Yūsofī |year=2015 |url=https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cahar-maqala/ }} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
* {{cite | |||
{{Afghanistan topics}} | {{Afghanistan topics}} | ||
| Line 341: | Line 465: | ||
[[Category:Ghurid dynasty| ]] | [[Category:Ghurid dynasty| ]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Former monarchies of Iran]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Muslim period in the Indian subcontinent]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Dynasties of Afghanistan]] | ||
[[Category:Sunni dynasties]] | |||
[[Category:History of Ghor Province]] | |||
[[Category:States and territories disestablished in the 1210s]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:04, 24 March 2026
Ghurid dynasty دودمان غوریان Dudmân-e Ğurīyân | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 786–1215 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Lua error in Module:Location_map/multi at line 27: Unable to find the specified location map definition: "Module:Location map/data/Ghurids" does not exist. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital | Firozkoh[4] Herat[5] Ghazni (1170s–1215)[6] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Common languages | Persian (court, literature)[7][8] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Religion | Before 1011: Paganism[9] From 1011: Sunni Islam[10][lower-alpha 1] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Government | Hereditary monarchy Diarchy (1173–1206) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Malik/Sultan | |||||||||||||||||||||
• 8th-century | Amir Banji (first) | ||||||||||||||||||||
• 1214–1215 | Zia al-Din Ali (last) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| History | |||||||||||||||||||||
• Established | 786 | ||||||||||||||||||||
• Disestablished | 1215 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Area | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1200 est.[11] | 2,000,000 km2 (770,000 sq mi) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The Ghurid dynasty (also spelled Ghorids; Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.; self-designation: Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.) was a culturally Persianate dynasty of eastern Iranian Tajik origin, which ruled from the 8th-century in the region of Ghor, and became an Empire from 1175 to 1215.[12] The Ghurids were centered in the hills of the Ghor region in the present-day central Afghanistan, where they initially started out as local chiefs. They gradually converted to Sunni Islam after the conquest of Ghor by the Ghaznavid ruler Mahmud of Ghazni in 1011. The Ghurids eventually overran the Ghaznavids when Muhammad of Ghor seized Lahore and expelled the Ghaznavids from their last stronghold.
The Ghurids initially ruled as vassals of the Ghaznavids and later of the Seljuks. However, during the early 12th-century the long-standing rivalry between the Seljuks and Ghaznavids created a power vacuum in eastern Afghanistan and Panjab which the Ghurids took advantage of and began their territorial expansion. Ala al-Din Husayn ended the Ghurid subordination to the Ghaznavids, ruthlessly sacking their capital, although he was soon defeated by the Seljuks after he stopped paying tribute to them. The Seljuk imperial power, however, was itself swept away in eastern Iran with the contemporaneous advent of the Khwarazmian Empire.
During the dyarchy of the Ala al-Din Husayn nephews – Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad and Muhammad of Ghor, the Ghurid empire reached its greatest territorial extent, holding encompassed territory from eastern Iran through easternmost India. While Ghiyath al-Din was occupied with the Ghurid expansion in the west, his junior partner in the dyarchy, Muhammad of Ghor and his lieutenants were active east of the Indus Valley as far as Bengal and eventually succeeded in conquering wide swaths of the Gangetic Plain, while in the west under Ghiyath al-Din, engaging in a protracted duel with the Shahs of Khwarazm, the Ghurids, reached as far as Gorgan (present-day Iran) on the shoreline of the Caspian Sea, albeit for a short time.
Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad died in 1203 of illness caused due to rheumatic disorders and soon after the Ghurids suffered a crushing defeat against the Khwrezmians aided by timely reinforcements from the Qara Khitais in the Battle of Andkhud in 1204. Muhammad was assassinated soon after in March 1206 which ended the Ghurid influence in Khurasan. The dynasty became extinguished all together within a decade when Shah Muhammad II uprooted the Ghurids in 1215. Their conquests in the Indian subcontinent nevertheless survived for several centuries under the evolving Delhi Sultanate established by Qutb ud-Din Aibak.
Origins[edit | edit source]

In the 19th century some European scholars, such as Mountstuart Elphinstone, favoured the idea that the Ghurid dynasty was related to today's Pashtun people[13][14][15] but this is generally rejected by modern scholarship.[16] Contemporary scholars state that the dynasty was of Tajik origin.[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Later, due to intermarrying, the Ghurid princes were distinguished by their significant blending of Tajik, Persian, Turkic, and native Afghan ethnicities.[23]
Encyclopædia Iranica states: "Nor do we know anything about the ethnic stock of the Ḡūrīs in general and the Šansabānīs in particular; we can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks".[21] Bosworth further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, Āl-e Šansab (Persianized: Šansabānī), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally Middle Persian name Wišnasp.[21]
Historian André Wink explains in The New Cambridge History of Islam:[24]
The Shansabānī dynasty superseded the Ghaznavids in the second half of the twelfth century. This dynasty was not of Turkish, nor even Afghan, but of eastern Persian or Tājīk origin, speaking a distinct Persian dialect of its own, like the rest of the inhabitants of the remote and isolated mountain region of Ghūr and its capital of Fīrūzkūh (in what is now central Afghanistan).
When the Ghurids started to distinguish themselves through their conquests, courtiers and genealogists (such as Fakhr-i Mudabbir and al-Juzjani) forged a fictive genealogy which connected the Ghurids with the Iranian past. They traced the Ghurid family back to the mythical Arab tyrant Zahhak, mentioned in the medieval Persian epic Shahnameh ("The Book of Kings"), whose family had reportedly settled in Ghur after the Iranian hero Fereydun had ended Zahhak's thousand-year tyranny.[8][21]
Additionally, nothing is known of the pre-Islamic religious beliefs of the Ghurids.[8]
Language[edit | edit source]
The Ghurids' native language was apparently different from their court language, Persian. Abu'l-Fadl Bayhaqi, the famous historian of the Ghaznavid era, wrote on page 117 in his book Tarikh-i Bayhaqi: "Sultan Mas'ud I of Ghazni left for Ghoristan and sent his learned companion with two people from Ghor as interpreters between this person and the people of that region." However, like the Samanids and Ghaznavids, the Ghurids were great patrons of Persian literature, poetry, and culture, and promoted these in their courts as their own. Modern-day authors refer to them as the "Persianized Ghurids".[25] Wink describes the tongue of the Ghurids as a "distinct Persian dialect".[24]
There is nothing to confirm the recent conclusion that the inhabitants of Ghor were originally Pashto-speaking, and claims of the existence of "Pashto poetry", such as Pata Khazana, from the Ghurid period are unsubstantiated.[26][16]
Extent[edit | edit source]
In the west, Ghurid territory extended to Nishapur and Merv,[27][28] while Ghurid troops reached as far as Gorgan on the shores of the Caspian Sea.[29][21] Eastward, the Ghurids invaded as far as Bengal.[30]
History[edit | edit source]
Early history[edit | edit source]
A certain Ghurid prince named Amir Banji was the ruler of Ghor and ancestor of the medieval Ghurid rulers. His rule was legitimized by the Abbasid caliph Harun al-Rashid. Before the mid-12th century, the Ghurids had been bound to the Ghaznavids and Seljuks for about 150 years. Beginning in the mid-12th century, Ghor expressed its independence from the Ghaznavid Empire. The early Ghurids followed Paganism before being converted to Islam by Abu Ali ibn Muhammad.[21] In 1149 the Ghaznavid ruler Bahram-Shah of Ghazna poisoned a local Ghurid leader, Qutb al-Din Muhammad, who had taken refuge in the city of Ghazni after having a quarrel with his brother Sayf al-Din Suri. In revenge, Sayf marched towards Ghazni and defeated Bahram-Shah. However, one year later, Bahram returned and scored a decisive victory against Sayf, who was shortly captured and crucified at Pul-i Yak Taq. Baha al-Din Sam I, another brother of Sayf, set out to avenge the death of his two brothers, but died of natural causes before he could reach Ghazni.
Ala al-Din Husayn (1149–61), one of the youngest of Sayf's brothers and newly crowned Ghurid king, also set out to avenge the death of his two brothers. He managed to defeat Bahram-Shah, and then had Ghazni sacked; the city burned for seven days and seven nights. He also sacked the Ghaznavid fortresses and palaces of Bost.[31] These actions earned him the title of Jahānsūz, meaning "the world burner".[32] The Ghaznavids retook the city with Seljuq help, but later lost it to Oghuz Turks.[32]
In 1152, Ala al-Din Husayn refused to pay tribute to the Seljuks and instead marched an army from Firozkoh but was defeated and captured at Nab in the Harīrūd Valley by Sultan Ahmed Sanjar after his forces defected to the Seljuqs.[33] During the battle, 6000 nomads from Ala al-Din's forces went over to the Seljuk army. Despite relatively smaller size of both armies, the defection of nomads at critical point of the battle eventually decided the issue in favour of the Seljuks.[34] Ala al-Din Husayn remained a prisoner for two years, until he was released in return for a heavy ransom to the Seljuqs and was allowed to reclaim his principality in Ghor. However, Sanjar was soon captured and imprisoned by the Ghuzz nomads in 1153, which allowed the Ghurids to expand their polity again.[35] Meanwhile, a rival of Ala al-Din named Husayn ibn Nasir al-Din Muhammad al-Madini had seized Firozkoh, but was murdered at the right moment when Ala al-Din returned to reclaim his ancestral domain. Ala al-Din spent the rest of his reign expanding the domains of his kingdom; he managed to conquer Garchistan, Tukharistan, Zamindawar, Bust, Bamiyan and other parts of Khurasan. Ala al-Din died in 1161, and was succeeded by his son Sayf al-Din Muhammad, who died two years later in a battle against the Oghuz Turks of Balkh.[36]
During the reign of Ala ad-Din, the Ghurids firmly established themselves at Firuzkuh and made it their capital, at the same time, the minor branches of the family who were the offshoot of concubinage with Turkish slave girls whom chronicler Juzjani called "Kanizak-i-turki" established themselves in Bamiyan and elsewhere.[37]
The Ghurids at their zenith[edit | edit source]

Sayf al-Din Muhammad was succeeded by his cousin Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad, who was the son of Baha al-Din Sam I, and proved himself to be a capable king. Right after Ghiyath's ascension, he, with the aid of his loyal brother Muhammad of Ghor (later known as "Shihabuddin Ghuri"), killed a rival Ghurid chief named Abu'l Abbas. Ghiyath then defeated his uncle Fakhr al-Din Masud who claimed the Ghurid throne and had allied with the Seljuq governor of Herat and Balkh.[38]
In 1173, Muhammad of Ghor after multiple attempts reconquered the city of Ghazni from the Ghuzz Turks, who had deposed the Ghaznavids from there earlier.[36] In 1175, the Ghurids took control of Herat from the Seljuks, and the city became one of their main power bases and centers of cultural development, together with Firozkoh and Ghazni.[39][40] They also took control of the areas of Nīmrūz and Sīstān, and extended their suzerainty as far as the Seljuks of Kerman.[41]
Ghurid conquest of Khorasan[edit | edit source]
Afterwards, Muhammad assisted his brother Ghiyath in his contest with the Khwarezmian Empire, who were at times supported by their "pagan" suzerains the Qara Khitai, for the lordship of Khorasan.[42] Seljuk power in Khorasan had collapsed since the defeat of Ahmad Sanjar against the Ghuzz Turks in 1153, which left the region at the hands of the Turkmen.[43][44] In 1181, Sultan Shah, a pretendent to the Khwarezmian throne, managed to take control of Khorasan, until 1192 when he was defeated near Merv by the Ghurids, who captured his territories.[42] The Ghurids then took control of all Khorasan following the death of his successor Tekish in 1200, capturing Nishapur in 1200, and reaching as far as Besṭām in the ancient region of Qūmes.[42][40]
After the death of his brother Ghiyath on 13 March 1203,[45] Muhammad became the successor of his empire and ruled until his assassination in 1206 near Jhelum by Ismāʿīlīs whom he persecuted during his lifetime.[46][47]
Conquest of India (1175 to 1206)[edit | edit source]


On the eve of the Ghurid invasion of the subcontinent, northern India was ruled by many independent Rajput kings, often fighting with each other, such as the Chahamana ruler Prithviraja III in Delhi and Ajmer, the Chaulukya ruler Mularaja II in Gujarat, the Gahadavala ruler Jayachandra in Kanauj,[50] further in the east of Ganges Plain there were other independent Hindu powers such as the Sena's under Lakshmana in Bengal etc.[51]
Northern India and Bengal were conquered by Muhammad of Ghor during the period from 1175 to 1205, just before his death in 1206. His capital was in Ghazni, while his elder brother Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad with whom Muhammad ruled in a diarchy, governed the western part of the empire from his capital at Fīrōzkōh.[52][53] In 1175, Muhammad crossed the Indus River, approaching it through the Gomal Pass instead of Khyber Pass, in order to outflank the Ghaznavids in Panjab. Muhammad captured Multan from the Carmathians, and also took Uch by 1176.[54][55]
In 1178, he turned south and again marched through the Gomal Pass, marching by the way of Multan and Uch to enter into the present-day Gujarat via Thar desert, where his armies got exhausted in their long march from Ghazna and were routed in the Battle of Kasahrada fought near Mount Abu at Kasahrada in the southern Aravalli Hills by a coalition of Rajput chiefs, which forced him to change his route for further incursions into India.[56][57] Afterwards, Muhammad pressed upon the Ghanzavids, whose domain was considerably truncated, though they were still controlling parts of Punjab and Pakistan down to the valley of Kabul which were of strategic importance in the pathway to northern India.[58] Thus by the turn of next decade, Muhammad conquered Sindh,[55] Peshawar, Sialkot and annexed the last Ghaznavid principality in Punjab, with their capital in Lahore, in 1186 through stratagem after three incursions.[59][60][61]
In 1191, the Ghurids seized Bathinda and marched towards Delhi, but were defeated in the First Battle of Tarain by the Rajput confederacy led by the Ajmer-Chahamana king Prithviraja III. Nevertheless, Muhammad returned a year later with an army of Turkish mounted archers and routed the Rajput forces in the Second Battle of Tarain, and executed Prithviraja shortly afterwards.[62][63] Govindaraja IV, son of Prithviraj Chauhan, submitted to the Ghurids the region of Ajmer, which became a vassal state.[64][65] In 1193, Delhi was conquered by Muhammad of Ghor's general Qutbu l-Din Aibak.[61][53] The newly conquered territories were then put under the governorship of Qutb ud-Din Aibak, who was now Viceroy in Delhi.[66][67]
In 1194, Muhammad returned to India and crossed the Yamuna River with an army of 50,000 horses and at the Battle of Chandawar defeated the forces of the Gahadavala king Jayachandra, who was killed in action. After the battle, Muhammad continued his advance to the east, with his general Qutb ud-Din Aibak in the vanguard. The city of Benares (Kashi) was taken and razed, and "idols in a thousand temples" were destroyed.[68][66][69] It is generally thought that the Buddhist city of Sarnath was also ravaged at that time.[69][70] In 1196, Qutb ud-Din Aibak vanquished Sulakshanapala, the ruler of the Kachchhapaghata dynasty of Gwalior, capturing Gwalior fort.[71] Also in 1196, Qutb ud-Din Aibak vanquished a coalition of the Rajputs of Ajmer and the Chaulukyas under king Bhima II at Mount Abu, thereafter sacking Anhilwara.[71]

In 1202–1203 CE, Qutbu l-Din Aibak, now Ghurid governor of Delhi, invaded the Chandela kingdom in the Ganges Valley.[72] The Ghurids toppled local dynasties and destroyed Hindu temples during their advance across northern India, in place constructing mosques on the same sites.[53] The revenue and booty gained after sacking the Hindu temples fuelled the efforts of Muhammad to finance his imperial aspirations in the west.[73]
Around 1203, Bakhtiyar Khalji, another Turkic general of Muhammad of Ghor, swept down the lower Gangetic Plain and into Bengal. In Bihar, he is said to have destroyed Buddhist centers of learning such as Nalanda University, greatly contributing to the decline of pre-Islamic Indic scholarship.[74][75] In Bengal, he sacked the ancient city of Nudiya in central Bengal, and established an Islamic government in the former Sena capital of Lakhnauti in 1205.[76][77][78][79]
Muhammad placed his faithful Turkic generals, rather than his own Ghurid brethens, in position of authority over local tributary kings, throughout the conquered Indian lands.[53] After the assassination of Muhammad in March 1206, his territories fragmented into smaller Sultanates led by his former Mamluk generals. Tajuddin Elduz became the ruler of Ghazni, Nasir-ud-Din Qabacha became Sultan of Multan, Bahauddin Tughril became Sultan of Bayana and Qutb al-Din Aibak became Sultan of Delhi.[80] Bakhtiyar Khilji became Sultan of Bengal, but was soon assassinated and succeeded by several Khalji rulers, until Bengal was incorporated into the Delhi Sultanate in 1227.[81][82] Between 1206 and 1228 the various Turkic rulers and their successors rivaled for preeminence until the Sultan of Delhi Iltutmish prevailed, marking the advent of the Mamluk dynasty. This was the first dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, which in total had five dynasties and would rule most of India for more than three centuries until the advent of the Mughal Empire in 1526.[53]
Decline and fall[edit | edit source]
Template:Continental Asia in 1210 CE Ghiyath died on 13 March 1203 due to gout[83] and was succeeded by Muhammad of Ghor as the sole ruler of the vast Ghurid Empire. Soon after, Alauddin Khwarazm Shah besieged and captured some of the strongholds of the Ghurids around Merv, although Muhammad drove him back and further besieged their capital Gurgānj.[84]
Alauddin then appealed to his nominal suzerain the Qara-Khitai, who dispatched a large contingent led by Yelü Zhilugu.[84] In the ensuing Battle of Andkhud (1204), fought near the river Oxus, the Ghurid troops were completely routed by the combined forces of the Qara-Khitai and the Khwarizmians.[84] The defeat at Andkhud was a watershed for the Ghurids who lost their control over most of the Khurasan. Notwithstanding, Muhammad within a year or so raised a vast army and build bridge across the Oxus to launch a full-scale invasion of Transoxiana to avenge his defeat. However, he was forced to move towards Punjab to crush a Khokhar rebellion whom he defeated and massacred in large number. On his way back, Muhammad of Ghor was assassinated near the Indus on March 15, 1206.[85][86]
After the death of Muhammad Ghori in 1206, a confused struggle then ensued among the remaining Ghūrid leaders and the Khwarezmians. The Khwarezmians under Ala al-Din Muhammad captured Herat and Ghor in 1206, and finally Ghazni in 1215, completing the takeover of the western part of the Ghūrid empire.[84][53] The Ghurid capital was transferred to Delhi, recognizing Khwarazmian rule on north and central Afghanistan. The Ghurids continued their rule on much of the Indian subcontinent, Sisitan region of Iran and south of Afghanistan.[87] Though the Ghūrids' empire was short-lived, Muhammad of Ghor's conquests strengthened the foundations of Muslim rule in India.
Religion And Creed[edit | edit source]
The Ghurids positioned themselves as defenders of Sunnism. They had good relations with the Abbasids in Baghdad, who urged them to repel the advances of the Kwarizmians into western Persia.[88] Their conquests in India were also presented as a battle between the armies of Islam (lashkar-i Islam) and the armies of the unbelievers (lashkar-i kuffar), and gave them great prestige in the Islamic world as defenders of the orthodoxy.[89]
It is said that the brothers Ghiyath al-Din and Mu'izz al-Din were raised as Karramites and initially adhered to the doctrines of that sect. Later, however, Ghiyath abandoned Karramism and adopted the Shafi'i school, a shift that caused significant tensions among the various branches of the Ghūrid dynasty. Bosworth wrote in 1968 that the Ghurid rulers abandoned their support for the Karramiyya and began following the Shafi'i school, "with its greater prestige and intellectual reputation." Their turn toward Ash'arism was closely connected to this shift, as attraction to Ash'ari theology and Shafi'i jurisprudence generally went hand in hand.[90] The alliance with the caliphate reinforced the Shafiʿi school of thought and likely contributed to the growing influence of Ash'ari theology in the Ghurid lands as well.[91]
The Ghurid ruler appointed the Ash'ari scholar Fakhr al-Din al-Razi to a high-ranking and well-paid governmental post, relieving his personal and financial difficulties.[92] Ghiyath al-Din also commissioned the construction of a madrasa in Herat for him.[93][94][95] The Ghurids promoted the study of Ilm al-Kalām (Islamic speculative theology), actively supporting scholars who engaged in theological inquiry and debate. In this spirit, they appointed Fakhr al-Din al-Razi as Malik al-Kalām, effectively making him the chief of speculative theology.[96] This reflects the close ties Ghurids held with Ash'ari scholars, also demonstrating their support for Ash'ari theological stances.
Like other Ghurids, Mu'izz al-Din of Ghor moved away from Karramism. However, unlike some of his contemporaries who leaned toward the Shafi'i school of thought, he aligned himself with the Hanafi school, which was dominant in Ghazni.[96] Consequently, he is likely to have endorsed the views of Hanafi Maturidi scholars, thereby identifying with the Māturīdī creed rather than the Ash'ari.[97]
Culture[edit | edit source]

The Ghurids were great patrons of Persian culture and literature. The Čahār maqāla, a work of Persian prose, was written by the poet Nizami Aruzi and dedicated to prince Abu’l-Ḥasan Ḥosām-al-Dīn ʿAlī.[98]
Ghurid contributions laid the basis for a Persianized state in the Indian subcontinent.[21][99][100] However, most of the literature produced during the Ghurid era has been lost. They also transferred Persian architecture to India.[101] According to Amir Khusrau (died 1325), the Indians learned Persian because of the influence of the "Ghurids and Turks."[102] The notion of Persian kingship served as the basis for the imperial formation, political and cultural unity of the Ghurids.[103]
Out of the Ghurid state grew the Delhi Sultanate which established the Persian language as the official court language of the region – a status it retained until the late Mughal era in the 19th century.
There was a strong Turkic presence among the Ghurids, since Turk slave-soldiers formed the vanguard of the Ghurid armies.[104] There was intense amalgamation between these various ethnic groups: "a notable admixture of Tajik, Persian, Turkish and indigenous Afghan ethnicities therefore characterized the Shansabanis".[104] At least until the end of the 13th century when they ruled the Mamluk Sultanate in India, the Turks in the Ghurid realm maintained their ethnical characteristics, continuing to use Turkish as their main language, rather than Persian, and persisting in their rude and bellicose ways as "men of the sword", in opposition to the Persian "men of the pen".[105]
-
The two mausoleums of Chisht (the western was built in 1167)
-
The eastern mausoleum of Chisht (built in 1194)
-
Ruins of the Shah-i Mashhad madrasa (built in 1176)
-
Ghurid arch in Qala-e-Bost
-
Great Mosque of Herat: Ghurid entrance (iwan) with remains of Ghurid inscriptions. 1200–1201 CE.[106]
-
Friday Mosque keyhole arch (Ghaznavid style)
-
Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, interior of portal
-
Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, kufic inscriptions
-
Ghiyath al-Din mausoleum, naskhi inscription
Metalwork of the Ghurid period[edit | edit source]

An important metalwork school was located in Herat during the Ghurid period, following the conquest of the Seljuk city by the Ghurids in 1175.[48] In the Islamic world, inlaid metalworking, consisting of patterned silver inlays in a brass background, was first developed in the region of Khurasan in the 12th century, by silversmiths facing a shortage of silver.[108] By the mid-12th century, Herat in particular had already gained a reputation for its high-quality inlaid metalwork, with works such as the Bobrinski Bucket (dated inscription of 1163).[108]
A series of remarkable ewers is attributed to this Herat school of metalwork at the time of Ghurid rule, during the 1180–1200 period. One of them, now in the Georgian National Museum, is marked with a poem in Persian which specifically records its manufacture in Herat in 1181–1182, and permits the attribution and dating of this group of ewers to 1180–1200 in Herat, at the time of Ghurid rule.[109][110][107]
My ewer is the most beautiful ewer of all time. Who in this world has anything like this today? Everyone who has seen it has said it is very beautiful. No one has seen its equal, for it is unparalleled
Look at the ewer from which spirit is born. It is the water of life that flows from it. Any stream that comes from it into the hand. Creates a new pleasure every moment
Look at the ewer that is praised by everyone. It would be worthy of service to an honored person like you Every eye that sees it opens wide. And says that nothing could be better than this
This water vessel is made in Herat. Who else could product anything like it (in the world)? Although the seven stars the Planets of the celestial sphere lift their heads high, May they look favorably upon him who produces such a ewer
Mercy be on him who makes such a ewer. May he be given silver and gold for making it. May good fortune come to him and caress him in friendship. May affliction be removed and given to his enemies
— Ewer in the name of Mahmud b. Muhammad al-Harawi Khurasan, Herat, dated A.H. Sha'ban 577 (December 10, 1181–January 7, 1182). Brass; raised, repousse, engraved, inlaid with copper and silver. Georgian National Museum, Janashia Museum of Georgia, Tbilisi (19-2008;32).[111][107]
The practice of inlaying "required relatively few tools" and the technique spread westward, perhaps by Khurasani artisans moving to other cities.[108] By the turn of the 13th century, the silver-inlaid-brass technique had reached Mosul under the Turkic Zengid dynasty (area of modern Iraq).[108]
Coinage[edit | edit source]
Overview[edit | edit source]
The Ghurid dynasty produced a wide variety of coinage, which indicates the administrative organization of the empire and expresses their imperial power. The presence of these Ghurid coins confirms their control over key cities such as Herat, Balkh, Bamiyan, and Ghazni.[112] This evidence also offers clear data for identifying periods of territorial shift, and establishing the hierarchy between various leaders.[112]
Physical Characteristics[edit | edit source]
Ghurid coins were primarily made of two metals: Silver (Dirham) and Copper (Fulus). Gold coins were occasionally issued as well.[113] The coins were generally epigraphic and non-pictorial, consisting of Arabic inscriptions in decorative Kufic or Naskh script in circular bands. These inscriptions would include the ruler's name and title(s), and would sometimes include verses from the Quran referencing divine help or victory.[114][115] This epigraphic design followed a long standing Islamic coinage tradition. This tradition was established during the Umayyad period, they replaced figural imagery with Quranic text to show religious identity and their political authority.[113] Continuing to use these designs connected them to Islamic artistic and religious traditions, while also reinforcing the dynasty's authority and religious devotion.
Key Mints[edit | edit source]

Evidence of mint names and inscriptions have been used to identify several primary centers of Ghurid coin production. These include Herat, Balkh, Ghazni, Bamiyan, and Firuzkuh.[112] Each mint documents different stages in the dynasty's political geography.
Herat was one of the earliest and most successful mints. It issued dirhams under Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad Ibn Sam when the city of Herat was conquered by the Ghurids in the middle of the twelfth century.[112]
Balkh coins date back to around 1190 and show periods of Ghurid control followed by non-Ghurid control, until around 1196 CE, which suggest the Ghurids had lost and recovered the city several times.[112]
Ghazni coin inscriptions identify Muʿizz al-Dīn Muhammad Ibn Sam, indicating his authority over eastern territories.[112]

Bamiyan coins were produced under Bahāʾ al-Dīn Sām and represent a semi-autonomous branch of the Ghurid family that retained the right to produce coins under their own name while being subject to the authority of their Ghurid overlords.[112]
Fīrūzkūh was the capital of the Ghurid dynasty and this mint was probably used to produce ceremonial or high value coins.[112]
The different inscriptions across these mints indicate political changes. For example, coins from Herat and Balkh show patterns of loss and recovery. This reflects the varying levels of territorial control of the Ghurids.[112] Therefore, coinage was not just about producing money, they also served as an administrative instrument and represented power.
Legacy[edit | edit source]
The Ghurid dynasty had fallen by the early 13th century, but their influence on the Islamic monetary system remained strong. The early coins of the Delhi Sultanate followed the same Ghurid weight and inscription standards.[112]The Ghurid numismatic model became the basis for the developing Indo-Islamic coinage systems for centuries to follow.
Architecture[edit | edit source]
The region was split into numerous different political rules and they all had fortified palaces and towers. Each palace was used as a way to protect and defend its inhabitants.[116] Architecture was functional but also a way to display wealth and power. There are numerous examples of minarets, towers, and mosques constructed to commemorate victories. An example of this can be seen with the Minaret of Jam, which is thought to be a monument built as a symbol of triumph.[117] The Ghurid Architectural style did not fall under one label. It was not specifically Persian nor was it distinctly Islamic, but rather what is described as an imperial architectural culture, which features mosques, towers, and minarets.[118] The architectural productions of the Ghurid dynasty was heavily reused and reconfigured from later cultures to articulate new religious and political identities.[119] There are not many still standing, but the Minaret of Jam still exists today.
List of rulers[edit | edit source]
| Coinage | Titular Name(s) | Personal Name | Reign |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amir امیر |
Amir Banji امیر سوری |
8th-century | |
| Malik ملک |
Amir Suri امیر سوری |
9th-century – 10th-century | |
| Malik ملک |
Muhammad ibn Suri محمد بن سوری |
10th-century – 1011 | |
| As vassals of the Ghaznavid Empire | |||
| Malik ملک |
Abu Ali ibn Muhammad ابوعلی بن محمد |
1011–1035 | |
| Malik ملک |
Abbas ibn Shith عباس بن شیث |
1035 – 1060 | |
| Malik ملک |
Muhammad ibn Abbas محمد بن عباس |
1060 – 1080 | |
| Malik ملک |
Qutb al-din Hasan قطب الدین حسن |
1080 – 1100 | |
| As vassals of the Seljuk Empire | |||
| Abul-Muluk ابولملک |
Izz al-Din Husayn عز الدین حسین |
1100–1146 | |
| Malik ملک |
Sayf al-Din Suri سیف الدین سوری |
1146–1149 | |
| Malik ملک |
Baha al-Din Sam I بهاء الدین سام |
1149 | |
| Malik ملک Sultan al-Muazzam سلطان المعظم |
Ala al-Din Husayn علاء الدین حسین |
1149–1161 | |
| As independent rulers | |||
| Malik ملک |
Sayf al-Din Muhammad سیف الدین محمد |
1161–1163 | |
| Sultan Abul-Fateh سلطان ابوالفتح |
Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad غیاث الدین محمد |
1163–1203 | |
|
Sultan Shahāb-ud-din Muhammad Ghori سلطان شهاب الدین محمد غوری |
Muhammad of Ghor معز الدین محمد |
1203–1206 |
| As vassals of the Khwarazmian Empire | |||
| Sultan سلطان |
Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud غیاث الدین محمود |
1206–1212 | |
| Sultan سلطان |
Baha al-Din Sam III بهاء الدین سام |
1212–1213 | |
| Sultan سلطان |
Ala al-Din Atsiz علاء الدین دراست |
1213–1214 | |
| Sultan سلطان |
Ala al-Din Ali علاء الدین علی |
1214–1215 | |
| Khwarazmian conquest | |||
Bamiyan Branch[edit | edit source]
| Coinage | Titular Name(s) | Personal Name | Reign |
|---|---|---|---|
| As independent rulers | |||
| Malik ملک |
Fakhr al-Din Masud فخرالدین مسعود |
1152–1163 | |
|
Malik ملک |
Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Masud شمس الدین محمد بن مسعود |
1163–1192 |
| Malik ملک |
Abbas ibn Muhammad عباس بن محمد |
1192 | |
|
Malik ملک Abul-Mu'ayyid ابوالمؤید |
Baha al-Din Sam II بهاء الدین سام |
1192–1206 |
| As vassal of the Khwarazmian Empire | |||
| Malik ملک |
Jalal al-Din Ali جلال الدین علی |
1206–1215 | |
| Khwarazmian conquest | |||
- Green shaded row signifies Ghurid vassalage under the Khwarazmian dynasty.
Ghurid family tree[edit | edit source]
| Ghurid dynasty family tree |
|---|
|
|
See also[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ See religion and creed. Initially, the Ghurids adopted Karramism, but later under Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad shifted to the Shafi'i school and Ash'arism, while Muhammad of Ghor shifted to the Hanafi school and Maturidism.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Schwartzberg, Joseph E. (1978). A Historical Atlas of South Asia. Oxford University Press, Digital South Asia Library. p. 147, Map "g".
- ↑ Eaton 2019, p. 38.
- ↑ Bosworth, C.E. (1 January 1998). History of Civilizations of Central Asia. UNESCO. pp. 432–433. ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1.
- ↑ Auer 2021, p. 6.
- ↑ Firuzkuh: the summer capital of the Ghurids Archived 6 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, by David Thomas, p. 18.
- ↑ The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-volume set, by Jonathan Bloom, Sheila Blair, p. 108.
- ↑ The Development of Persian Culture under the Early Ghaznavids, C.E. Bosworth, Iran, Vol. 6, (1968), 35;;"Like the Ghaznavids whom they supplanted, the Ghurids had their court poets, and these wrote in Persian"
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 O'Neal 2015.
- ↑ Minorsky, Vladmir (1970). Ḥudūd al-'Ālam, "The Regions of the World,". Leningrad: University Press, Oxford. p. 110. ISBN 9780906094037.
- ↑ The Ghurids, K.A. Nizami, History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol.4, Part 1, ed. M.S. Asimov and C.E. Bosworth, (Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1999), 178.
- ↑ Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, C. A.; Scheidel, Walter (2020). The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume One: The Imperial Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 92–94. ISBN 978-0-19-977311-4.
- ↑ Barisitz, Stephan (2017). Central Asia and the Silk Road: Economic Rise and Decline over Several Millennia. Springer. p. 94. ISBN 978-3-319-51213-6.
- ↑ Elphinstone, Mountstuart. The History of India. Vol. 1. J. Murray, 1841. Web. 29 April 2010. Link: "...the prevalent and apparently the correct opinion is, that both they and their subjects were Afghans. " & "In the time of Sultan Mahmud it was held, as has been observed, by a prince whom Ferishta calls Mohammed Soory (or Sur) Afghan." pp. 598–599
- ↑ A short history of India: and of the frontier states of Afghanistan, Nipal, and Burma, Wheeler, James Talboys Archived 9 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine, (LINK): "The next conqueror after Mahmud who made a name in India, was Muhammad Ghori, the Afghan."
- ↑ Balfour, Edward. The Cyclopædia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia, Commercial Industrial, and Scientific: Products of the Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1885. Web. 29 April 2010. Link: "IZ-ud-DIN Husain, the founder of the Ghori dynasty, was a native of Afghanistan. The origin of the house of Ghor has, however, been much discussed, – the prevailing opinion being that both they and their subjects were an Afghan race. " p. 392
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 M. Longworth Dames; G. Morgenstierne; R. Ghirshman (1999). "AFGHĀNISTĀN". Encyclopaedia of Islam (CD-ROM Edition v. 1.0 ed.). Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
"... there is no evidence for assuming that the inhabitants of Ghūr were originally Pashto-speaking (cf. Dames, in E I1). If we are to believe the Paṭa Khazāna (see below, iii), the legendary Amīr Karōṝ, grandson of Shansab, (8th century) was a Pashto poet, but this for various reasons is very improbable ..."
- ↑ Richard Eaton (2000). Essays on Islam and Indian History. Oxford University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-19-565114-0.
The dynamics of north Indian politics changed dramatically, however, when the Ghurids, a dynasty of Tajik (eastern Iranian), origin arrived from central Afghanistan towards the end of twelfth century
- ↑ Encyclopaedia of Islam, "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: "... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the Ghūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."
- ↑ Wink 2020, p. 78.
- ↑ Cynthia Talbot, The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj Chauhan and the Indian Past, 1200–2000, (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 36.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 21.5 21.6 Bosworth 2001b.
- ↑ Flood, Finbarr B. (2018). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-691-18074-8.
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Avari, Burjor (2013). Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent. Routledge. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-415-58061-8.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Template:New Cambridge History of Islam
- ↑ Flood, Finbarr Barry (2009). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-691-12594-7.
- ↑ Encyclopaedia of Islam, "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: "... There is nothing to confirm the recent surmise that the Ghūids were Pashto-speaking [...] the Paṭa Khazāna "Treasury of secrets", claims to include Pashto poetry from the Ghūid period, but the significance of this work has not yet been evaluated ..."
- ↑ Thomas 2018, p. 26, Figure I:2.
- ↑ Schmidt, Karl J. (2015). An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History. Routledge. p. 37, Map 16.2. ISBN 978-1-317-47681-8.
- ↑ History of Civilizations of Central Asia. UNESCO. 1998. ISBN 978-92-3-103467-1.
In 1201 Ghurid troops entered Khurasan and captured Nishapur, Merv, Sarakhs and Tus, reaching as far as Gurgan and Bistam. Kuhistan, a stronghold of the Ismailis, was plundered and all Khurasan was brought temporarily under Ghurid control
- ↑ Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections. Brill. 2020. p. 237. ISBN 978-90-04-43736-4.
In 1205, Bakhtīyar Khilji sacked Nudiya, the pre-eminent city of western Bengal and established an Islamic government at Laukhnauti, the capital of the predecessor Sena dynasty. On this occasion, commemorative coins were struck in gold and silver in the name of Muhammad b. Sām
- ↑ "Encyclopaedia Iranica (Ghurids)". iranicaonline.org.
Ḡazna and Bost suffered frightful sackings by ʿAlāʾ-al-Dīn Ḥosayn, in which colleges and libraries were despoiled, and the buildings of previous sultans destroyed (Jūzjānī, pp. 343–345; Čahār maqāla, ed. Qazvīnī, p. 31), earning him the uneviable epithet of Jahānsūz (world incendiary).
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 Bosworth 2001a, pp. 578–583.
- ↑ Wink 1991, p. 136.
- ↑ Thomas 2018, p. 55.
- ↑ Thomas 2018, p. 56.
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 Wink 1991, p. 138.
- ↑ Wink 1991, pp. 136–137.
- ↑ Bosworth 1968, p. 163.
- ↑ Flood, Finbarr Barry (2022). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval 'Hindu-Muslim' Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-1-4008-3324-5.
- ↑ 40.0 40.1 Flood, Finbarr Barry (2022). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval 'Hindu-Muslim' Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-1-4008-3324-5.
- ↑ Bosworth, Edmond. "Encyclopaedia Iranica (Ghurids)". iranicaonline.org.
In the west, Ḡīāṯ-al-Dīn, often in concert with his brother, extended his suzerainty over the maleks of Nīmrūz or Sīstān and even over the Kermān branch of the Saljuqs.
- ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 Encyclopaedia Iranica, Ghurids.
The actual fighting in Khorasan at this time was largely between the Ghurids and Tekeš's brother Solṭānšāh, who had carved out for himself personally a principality in western Khorasan, until in 586/1190. Ḡīāṯ-al–Dīn and Moʿezz-al-Dīn defeated Solṭānšāh near Marv in 588/1192, captured him, and took over his territories (Jūzjānī, I, 303–304, tr. I, pp. 246–247). When Tekeš died in 596/1200 (Ebn al-Aṯīr, Beirut, XII, pp. 156–158), Ḡīāṯ-al-Dīn was able to take over most of the towns of Khorasan as far west as Besṭām in Qūmes.
- ↑ Encyclopaedia Iranica, Ghurids.
ʿAlāʾ-al-Dīn Ḥosayn's expansionist policies raised the Ghurids into a power of significance well beyond Ḡūr itself. Latterly, he was able to take advantage of a certain power-vacuum in the eastern Islamic world which had arisen through the decay of the Ghaznavids and the collapse of Saljuq power in Khorasan consequent on Sanjar's defeat and capture by the Ḡozz (q.v.) in 548/1153.
- ↑ "Encyclopedia Iranica, Sanjar". iranicaonline.org.
- ↑ Mohammad Habib (1992). "The Asiatic Environment". In Mohammad Habib; Khaliq Ahmad Nizami (eds.). A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526). Vol. 5 (Second ed.). The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House. p. 44. OCLC 31870180.
At this juncture Sultan Ghiyasuddin Ghuri died at Herat on 27 Jamadi I.A H 599 (13 March A.D 1203)
- ↑ Bosworth 1968, p. 168.
- ↑ Chandra 2007, p. 73:"Muizzuddin led his last campaign into India in 1206 in order to deal with the Khokhar rebellion. He resorted to large-scale slaughter of the Khokhars and cowed them down. On his way back to Ghazni, he was killed by a Muslim fanatic belonging to a rival sect"
- ↑ 48.0 48.1 Flood, Finbarr B. (2018). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. pp. 115–117. ISBN 978-0-691-18074-8.
- ↑ Goron, Stan; Goenka, J. P.; Robinson (numismatist.), Michael (2001). The Coins of the Indian Sultanates: Covering the Area of Present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Munshiram Manoharlal. ISBN 978-81-215-1010-3.
Obverse: horseman to left holding a mace, margin with date in Nagari Samvat 1262 Bhadrapada . Reverse : legend in Nagari śrīmat mahamada sāmaḥ . Issued in AD 1204
- ↑ Thapar 2004, pp. 421, 433–434: "The campaigns saw Muhammad in control of Lahore and led to the visions of further conquests in India. An attack was launched on the Rajput kingdoms controlling the watershed and the western Ganges Plain, now beginning to be viewed as the frontier.."
- ↑ Thapar 2004, p. 433.
- ↑ Wink 1991, p. 139–140.
- ↑ 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 53.5 Eaton 2019, pp. 39–45.
- ↑ Wink 1991, p. 143.
- ↑ 55.0 55.1 Thapar 2004, p. 434.
- ↑ Asoke Kumar Majumdar (1956). Chaulukyas of Gujarat. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. pp. 131–132. OCLC 4413150.
- ↑ Chandra 2007, p. 68: "In 1173, Shahabuddin, Muhammad (1173–1206 (also known as Muizzuddin Muhammad bin Sam) ascended the throne at Ghazni, while his elder brother was ruling at Ghur. Proceeding by way of the Gomal pass, Muizzuddin Muhammad conquered Multan and Uchch. In 1178, he attempted to penetrate into Gujarat by marching across the Rajputana desert. But the Gujarat ruler completely routed him in a battle near Mount Abu, and Muizzuddin Muhammad was lucky in escaping alive. He now realised the necessity of creating a suitable base in the Punjab before venturing upon the conquest of India. Accordingly he launched a campaign against the Ghaznavid possessions in the Punjab. By 1190, Muizzuddin Muhammad had conquered Peshawar, Lahore and Sialkot, and was poised for a thrust towards Delhi and the Gangetic doab"
- ↑ Bosworth 1977, p. 129.
- ↑ Wink 1991, p. 144.
- ↑ Bosworth 2001a.
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 Eaton, Richard M. (1993). The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760. Berkeley · Los Angeles · London: University of California Press. p. Chapter 1–2.
- ↑ Hermann Kulke; Dietmar Rothermund (2004). A History of India. Psychology Press. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-415-32919-4.
"The first battle of Tarain was won by the Rajput confederacy led by Prithviraj Chauhan of Ajmer. But when Muhammad of Ghur returned the following year with 10,000 archers on horseback he vanquished Prithviraj and his army
- ↑ Thapar 2004, pp. 434–435.
- ↑ Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
- ↑ Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
- ↑ 66.0 66.1 Mohammad Habib (1981). K. A. Nizami (ed.). Politics And Society During The Early Medieval Period Vol. 2. People's Publishing House. p. 116.
In the winter of A.D. 1194–1195 Shihabuddin once more marched into Hindustan and invaded the doab. Rai Jaichand moved forward to meet him....then description of Chandwar struggle (...) Shihabuddin captured the treasure fort of Asni and then proceeded to Benaras, 'where he converted about thousand idol-temples into house for the Musalmans.
- ↑ Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. p. 2. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
- ↑ Chandra 2007, p. 71: "In 1194, Muizzuddin returned to India. He crossed the Jamuna with 50,000 cavalry and moved towards Kanauj. A hotly contested battle between Muizzuddin and Jaichandra was fought at Chandawar near Kanauj. We are told that Jaichandra had almost carried the day when he was killed by an arrow, and his army was totally defeated. Muizzuddin now moved on to Banaras which was ravaged, a large number of temples there being destroyed"
- ↑ 69.0 69.1 Asher, Frederick M. (2020). Sarnath: A Critical History of the Place Where Buddhism Began. Getty Publications. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-60606-616-4.
And then, in 1193, Qutb-ud-din Aibek, the military commander of Muhammad of Ghor's army, marched towards Varanasi, where he is said to have destroyed idols in a thousand temples. Sarnath very likely was among the casualties of this invasion, one all too often seen as a Muslim invasion whose primary purpose was iconoclasm. It was of course, like any premodern military invasion, intended to acquire land and wealth
- ↑ Asher, Frederick M. (2020). Sarnath: A Critical History of the Place Where Buddhism Began. Getty Publications. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-60606-616-4.
- ↑ 71.0 71.1 Jayapalan, N. (2001). History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. ISBN 978-81-7156-928-1.
- ↑ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 123–126.
- ↑ Thapar 2004, pp. 434, 436.
- ↑ Roy, Himanshu (2021). Political Thought in Indic Civilization. Sage Publishing India. p. 6. ISBN 978-93-5479-159-8.
After the arrival of Islam, the universities such as Nalanda and Vikramshila were no longer existent. The destruction of Nalanda by Bakhtiyar Khalji was the last nail in this pre-Islamic Indic university, which had survived three major destructions
- ↑ Koh, Tommy; Singh, Hernaikh (2020). India on Our Minds: Essays by Tharman Shanmugaratnam and 50 Singaporean Friends of India. World Scientific. p. 91. ISBN 978-981-12-2453-9.
- ↑ Turkish History and Culture in India: Identity, Art and Transregional Connections. Brill. 2020. p. 237. ISBN 978-90-04-43736-4.
- ↑ Majumdar, R. C. (1973). History of Mediaeval Bengal. Calcutta: G. Bharadwaj & Co. pp. 1–2. OCLC 1031074.
Tradition gives him credit for the conquest of Bengal but as a matter of fact he could not subjugate the greater part of Bengal ... All that Bakhtyār can justly take credit for is that by his conquest of Western and a part of Northern Bengal he laid the foundation of the Muslim State in Bengal. The historians of the 13th century never attributed the conquest of the whole of Bengal to Bakhtyār.
- ↑ Mehta, Jaswant Lal (1986) [First published 1979]. Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India. Vol. I (2nd ed.). Sterling Publishers. pp. 81–82. ISBN 978-81-207-0617-0. OCLC 883279992.
The Turkish arms penetrated into Bihar and Bengal, through the enterprising efforts of Ikhtiyaruddin Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji ... he started plundering raids into Bihar and, within four or five years, occupied a large part of it ... Nadia was sacked by the Turks and a few districts of Bengal (Malda, Dinajpur, Murshidabad and Birbhum) were occupied by them ... Bathtiyar Khalji could not retain his hold over Nadia and made Lakhnauti or Gaur as his capital.
- ↑ Thakur, Amrendra Kumar (1992). India and the Afghans: A study of a neglected region, 1370–1576 A.D. Janaki Prakashan. p. 148. ISBN 9788185078687.
- ↑ K. A. Nizami (1992). "The Early Turkish Sultans of Delhi". In Mohammad Habib; Khaliq Ahmad Nizami (eds.). A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526). Vol. 5 (Second ed.). The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House. p. 201. OCLC 31870180.
- ↑ Nafziger, George F.; Walton, Mark W. (2003). Islam at War: A History. Praeger Publishers. p. 56. ISBN 9780275981013.
- ↑ Chandra, Satish (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206–1526) – Part One. Har-Anand Publications. pp. 43–44. ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.
- ↑ Bosworth 1968, p. 164.
- ↑ 84.0 84.1 84.2 84.3 Sicker, Martin (2000). The Islamic World in Ascendancy: From the Arab Conquests to the Siege of Vienna. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-313-00111-6.
- ↑ Satish Chandra (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206–1526) – Part One. Har-Anand Publications. p. 29. ISBN 978-81-241-1064-5.
- ↑ Bosworth 1968, p. 165.
- ↑ Ira M. Lapidus, A History of Islamic Societies 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press 2002
- ↑ Bosworth, Edmond. "Encyclopaedia Iranica (Ghurids)". iranicaonline.org.
The Ghurids adopted the role of defenders of Sunnism. They had cordial relations with the ʿAbbasids in Baghdad, frequently exchanging embassies (Jūzjānī's father took part in one of the last, Jūzjānī, I, p. 361, tr. p. 383). Ḡīāṯ-al-Dīn was admitted to al-Nāṣer's fotūwa order, and the caliph more than once urged the Ghurids to halt the advance into western Persia of the Ḵᵛārazmšāhs (Jūzjānī, I, 302, tr. I, p. 243).
- ↑ Flood, Finbarr Barry (2022). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval 'Hindu-Muslim' Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-4008-3324-5.
- ↑ Griffel, Frank (8 June 2021). The Formation of Post-Classical Philosophy in Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-19-088634-9.
- ↑ Griffel, Frank (8 June 2021). The Formation of Post-Classical Philosophy in Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 290. ISBN 978-0-19-088634-9.
- ↑ Khan, Muhammad (1 September 2009). The Muslim 100: The Lives, Thoughts and Achievements of the Most Influential Muslims in History. Kube Publishing Ltd. p. 285. ISBN 978-1-84774-029-8.
- ↑ Necipoğlu, Gülru (1 January 2002). Muqarnas: An Annual on the Visual Culture of the Islamic World. BRILL. p. 13. ISBN 978-90-04-12593-3.
- ↑ إسماعيل, أبو الفداء/الملك المؤيد (1 January 1997). تاريخ أبي الفداء 1-2 المسمى المختصر في أخبار البشر ج2 [Imam Fakhr al-Din Muhammad ibn Umar ibn Husayn al-Razi had come to Ghiyath al-Din, who had shown him great honor and respect, and had built a madrasa for him in Herat near the mosque. This greatly angered the Karramiyya.] (in العربية). Dar Al Kotob Al Ilmiyah دار الكتب العلمية. p. 185.
- ↑ Ibn-al-At̲īr, ʻIzz-ad-Dīn Abu-'l-Ḥasan ʻAlī (1890). Tārīḫ al-Kāmil [In this year, a great discord arose in the army of Ghiyath al-Din, the king of Ghor and Ghazni, at Firuzkuh. Both the common people and the kings and princes were involved. The cause was that Fakhr Muhammad ibn Umar ibn al-Husayn al-Razi, the renowned imam and Shafi'i jurist, had come to Ghiyath al-Din from Manar, sent by Baha' al-Din Sam, the ruler of Bamiyan, who was Ghiyath al-Din's maternal uncle. Ghiyath al-Din honored him, treated him with great respect, and built for him a madrasa in Bahārā near the mosque. Scholars from various regions came to him, and this greatly impressed and pleased many in Bahārā.] (in العربية). S. t. p. 59.
- ↑ 96.0 96.1 Flood, Finbarr Barry (12 July 2022). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-1-4008-3324-5.
- ↑ Necipoğlu, Gülru (1 January 2002). Muqarnas: An Annual on the Visual Culture of the Islamic World. BRILL. p. 16. ISBN 978-90-04-12593-3.
- ↑ Yūsofī 2015.
- ↑ Persian Literature in the Safavid Period, Z. Safa, The Cambridge history of Iran: The Timurid and Safavid periods, Vol. 6, Ed. Peter Jackson and Laurence Lockhart,(Cambridge University Press, 1986), 951; "...Ghurids and Ghurid mamluks, all of whom established centres in India where poets and writers received ample encouragement.".
- ↑ Patel, Alka (University of California) (2017). The Coming of the Mongols. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 19–25. ISBN 978-1-78673-383-2.
- ↑ Hambly & Asher 1994, pp. 242–250.
- ↑ Auer 2021, p. 30.
- ↑ Auer 2021, p. 12.
- ↑ 104.0 104.1 Avari, Burjor (2013). Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent. Routledge. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-415-58061-8.
- ↑ Eaton 2019, pp. 48–49.
- ↑ Flood, Finbarr Barry (2022). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. pp. 105–106. ISBN 978-1-4008-3324-5.
- ↑ 107.0 107.1 107.2 Canby, Sheila R.; Beyazit, Deniz; Rugiadi, Martina; Peacock, A. C. S. (2016). Court and Cosmos: The Great Age of the Seljuqs. Metropolitan Museum of Art. p. 155, item 85. ISBN 978-1-58839-589-4.
- ↑ 108.0 108.1 108.2 108.3 Raby, Julian (2012). "The Principle of Parsimony and the Problem of the 'Mosul School of Metalwork'". In Porter, Venetia; Rosser-Owen, Mariam (eds.). Metalwork and Material Culture in the Islamic World (PDF). Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 11–85. ISBN 978-0-85773-343-6. Retrieved 18 November 2022.
- ↑ "Ewer". The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
- ↑ "Ewer". The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
At the time that this ewer and the group of long-necked ewers to which it relates were produced, Herat was under the control of the Ghurids, not the Seljuqs, but evidence strongly suggests that these pieces were exported to centers in Seljuq Iran and elsewhere.
- ↑ Metropolitan Museum of Art notice
- ↑ 112.00 112.01 112.02 112.03 112.04 112.05 112.06 112.07 112.08 112.09 O'Neal, Michael (2020). "Some New Numismatic Evidence for Ghurid History". Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference of Iranian Studies. Volume II: Studies on Iran and the Persianate World after Islam. Saint Petersburg: State Hermitage Publishers. pp. 200–214. ISBN 978-5-93572-911-0.
- ↑ 113.0 113.1 Encyclopaedia of Islam Online. "Coinage." Edited by Kate Fleet, Gudrun Krämer, Denis Matringe, John Nawas, and Devin J. Stewart. Brill, 2007–present. Accessed 4 November 2025.
- ↑ O’Neal, Michael. "Some New Numismatic Evidence for Ghurid History." Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference of Iranian Studies (2020): 207–210.
- ↑ Flood, Finbarr Barry. "Islamic Identities and Islamic Art: Inscribing the Qur’an in Twelfth-Century Afghanistan." Studies in the History of Art 74 (2009): 94–96.
- ↑ "MWNF - Museum With No Frontiers". islamicart.museumwnf.org. Retrieved 20 October 2025.
- ↑ Pinder-Wilson, Ralph (2001). "Ghaznavid and Ghūrid Minarets". Iran. 39: 155–186. doi:10.2307/4300603. JSTOR 4300603.
- ↑ Patel, Alka (2007). "Architectural Cultures and Empire: The Ghurids in Northern India (ca. 1192–1210)". Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 21: 35–60. ISSN 0890-4464. JSTOR 24049362.
- ↑ Flood, Finbarr B. (2001). "Ghūrid Architecture in the Indus Valley: The Tomb of Shaykh Sādan Shahīd". Ars Orientalis. 31: 129–166. ISSN 0571-1371. JSTOR 4629582.
Bibliography[edit | edit source]
- Auer, Blain (2021). In the Mirror of Persian Kings: The Origins of Perso-Islamic Courts and Empires in India. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108832311.
- Bosworth, C. E. (1977). The Later Ghaznavids; Splendour and Decay: The Dynasty in Afghanistan and Northern India 1040–1186. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-85224-315-2.
- Template:Cambridge History of Iran (subscription required)
- Bosworth, C. Edmund (2001a). "Ghaznavids". Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, Vol. X, Fasc. 6. New York. pp. 578–583.
{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Bosworth, C. Edmund (2001b). "Ghurids". Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, Vol. X, Fasc. 6. New York. pp. 586–590.
{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Bosworth, C.E. (2015). "The Ghurids in Khurasan". In Peacock, A.C.S.; Tor, D.G. (eds.). Medieval Central Asia and the Persianate World: Iranian Tradition and Islamic Civilisation. I.B. Tauris.
- Chandra, Satish (2007). History of Medieval India:800–1700. Orient Longman. ISBN 978-81-250-3226-7.
- Eaton, Richard M. (2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765. Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0713995824.
- Frye, R.N. (1975). "The Ghaznavids and Ghūrids". In Frye, R.N. (ed.). The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 5: The Iranian world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 157–165. ISBN 0-521-20093-8.
- Template:Encyclopaedia Iranica
- Morgan, David; Stewart, Sarah, eds. (2017). The Coming of the Mongols. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1788312851.
- Niyogi, Roma (1959). The History of the Gāhaḍavāla Dynasty. Oriental. OCLC 5386449.
- O'Neal, Michael (2015). "Ghūrids". In Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Rowson, Everett (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. Brill Online. ISSN 1873-9830.
- Sisirkumar Mitra (1977). The Early Rulers of Khajurāho. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 9788120819979.
- Thapar, Romila (2004). Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24225-8.
- Thomas, David (2018). The Ebb and Flow of the Ghūrid Empire. Sydney University Press. ISBN 978-1-74332-542-1.
- Wink, André (2020). The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: c.700–1800 CE. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108417747.
- Wink, Andre (1991). Al-Hind the Making of the Indo-Islamic World: The Slave Kings and the Islamic Conquest : 11th–13th Centuries. BRILL. ISBN 9004102361.
- Yūsofī, Ḡolām-Ḥosayn (2015). "ČAHĀR MAQĀLA". Encyclopaedia Iranica.






![Great Mosque of Herat: Ghurid entrance (iwan) with remains of Ghurid inscriptions. 1200–1201 CE.[106]](https://storage.googleapis.com/smartcommons/commons/f/f4/Great_Mosque_of_Herat._Brick_iwan_with_remains_of_Ghurid_inscriptions._1200-1201_CE_%28corrected_for_perspective%29.jpg)



