Mary, mother of Jesus: Difference between revisions

Created by Ajay Kumar
Last edited March 21, 2026
Created a new article
 
Nhungexim (talk | contribs)
rework information per sources
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Mother of Jesus}}
{{Short description|Mother of Jesus}}
{{for|the 1999 television film|Mary, Mother of Jesus (film){{!}}''Mary, Mother of Jesus'' (film)}}
{{Redirect-several|Mary, Mother of Jesus|Mary of Nazareth|Mother Mary|Saint Mary|Virgin Mary}}
{{redirect-multi|2|Saint Mary|Virgin Mary}}
{{protection padlock|small=yes}}
{{Use American English|date=August 2023}}
{{Use American English|date=November 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2023}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2025}}
{{Infobox person
{{Infobox person
| name              = Mary
| name              = Mary
| honorific_prefix  =
| image              = Madonna Advocata.png
| image              = Madonna Advocata.png
| alt                = Slightly faded painting of a woman wearing a black veil, staring out of the portrait. Her hands are raised. The image is on a gold background.
| alt                = Slightly faded painting of a woman wearing a black veil, staring out of the portrait. Her hands are raised. The image is on a gold background.
| caption            = The [[Maria Advocata (Madonna del Rosario)|''Madonna del Rosario'']] ({{circa|6th century}} or earlier), perhaps the oldest icon of Mary in Rome
| caption            = The [[Maria Advocata (Madonna del Rosario)|''Madonna del Rosario'']] ({{circa|6th century}} or earlier), perhaps the oldest icon of Mary in Rome. Medieval tradition held that this icon was painted by [[Luke the Evangelist]].
| birth_date        = {{circa|18 BC}}{{efn|Per the [[Bar and bat mitzvah#Significance|Jewish customs surrounding marriage]] at the time, and the apocryphal [[Gospel of James]], Mary was approximately 13–14 years old when giving birth to Jesus.<ref name="NewAdvent" /> Her year of birth is therefore contingent on [[Date of birth of Jesus|that of Jesus]], and though some posit slightly different dates (such as [[John P. Meier|Meier]]'s dating of {{c.|7}} or 6&nbsp;BC)<ref>{{cite book |last=Meier |first=John P. |author-link=John P. Meier |title=A Marginal Jew: The Roots of the Problem and the Person |year=1991 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-14018-7|page=407}}</ref> general consensus places Jesus' birth in {{c.|4}}&nbsp;BC,<ref>{{cite book|last=Sanders|first=E.&nbsp;P.|author-link=E. P. Sanders|title=The Historical Figure of Jesus|publisher=Allen Lane Penguin Press|year=1993|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lkbTL36ZgPIC|isbn=978-0-14-192822-7|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=18 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170418040039/https://books.google.com/books?id=lkbTL36ZgPIC|url-status=live|pages=10–11}}</ref> thus placing Mary's birth in {{c.|18}}&nbsp;BC.}}
| birth_date        = {{circa|18 BC}}{{efn|Per the [[Bar and bat mitzvah#Significance|Jewish customs surrounding marriage]] at the time, and the apocryphal [[Gospel of James]], Mary, at the time of her betrothal to Joseph, was 12–14 years old.<ref name="NewAdvent" /><ref>{{cite book |last=Meier |first=John P. |author-link=John P. Meier |title=A Marginal Jew: The Roots of the Problem and the Person |year=1991 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-14018-7|pages=235, 318}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Thompson |first=A. Keith |title=The Character and Knowledge of Mary, the Mother of Christ |year=2020 |journal=Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship |volume= 36 |page=110 |issn=2372-126X}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |title=The Birth of Jesus |encyclopedia=Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus |publisher=Brill |year=2011 |first=France |last=Richard |page=2376 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LuKMmVu0tpMC&pg=PA2376 |isbn=978-90-04-16372-0 |editor1-first=Tom |editor1-last=Holmen |editor2-first=Stanley E. |editor2-last=Porter |access-date=21 February 2025 |archive-date=18 December 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251218154433/https://books.google.com/books?id=LuKMmVu0tpMC&pg=PA2376 |url-status=live }}</ref> Her year of birth is therefore contingent on [[Date of birth of Jesus|that of Jesus]], and though some posit slightly different dates (such as [[John P. Meier|Meier]]'s dating of {{c.|7}} or 6&nbsp;BC)<ref>{{cite book |last=Meier |first=John P. |author-link=John P. Meier |title=A Marginal Jew: The Roots of the Problem and the Person |year=1991 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-14018-7|page=407}}</ref> general consensus places Jesus' birth in {{c.|4}}&nbsp;BC,<ref>{{cite book|last=Sanders|first=E.&nbsp;P.|author-link=E. P. Sanders|title=The Historical Figure of Jesus|publisher=Allen Lane Penguin Press|year=1993|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lkbTL36ZgPIC|isbn=978-0-14-192822-7|access-date=1 September 2022|archive-date=18 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170418040039/https://books.google.com/books?id=lkbTL36ZgPIC|url-status=live|pages=10–11}}</ref> thus placing Mary's birth in {{c.|18}} BC.}}
| birth_place        = [[Herodian Kingdom of Judea]]
| birth_place        = [[Herodian kingdom|Herodian Judea]]
| death_date        = after {{c.|33 AD}}
| death_date        = After {{c.|33 AD}}
| death_place        = [[Jerusalem]], [[Province of Judea|Province of Judaea]], [[Roman Empire]]<br />or [[Ephesus]], [[Province of Asia]], [[Roman Empire]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Catholic Enncyclopedia: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |access-date=2 January 2023 |website=www.newadvent.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Tomb of Mary: Location and Significance: University of Dayton, Ohio |url=https://udayton.edu/imri/mary/t/tomb-of-mary-location-and-significance.php |access-date=2 January 2023 |website=udayton.edu}}</ref>
| death_place        = [[Jerusalem]], [[Province of Judea|Province of Judaea]], [[Roman Empire]]<br />or [[Ephesus]], [[Province of Asia]], [[Roman Empire]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Catholic Enncyclopedia: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |access-date=2 January 2023 |website=New Advent |archive-date=6 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706013025/http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Tomb of Mary: Location and Significance: University of Dayton, Ohio |url=https://udayton.edu/imri/mary/t/tomb-of-mary-location-and-significance.php |access-date=2 January 2023 |website=udayton.edu |archive-date=8 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608074159/https://udayton.edu/imri/mary/t/tomb-of-mary-location-and-significance.php |url-status=live }}</ref>
| spouse            = [[Saint Joseph|Joseph]]
| spouse            = [[Saint Joseph|Joseph]]
| children          = [[Jesus]]{{efn|According to the [[Bible]] and the [[Quran]].}}
| children          = [[Jesus]]
| parents            = [[Joachim]] and [[Saint Anne|Anne]] (According to some apocryphal writings)
| parents            = [[Joachim]] and [[Saint Anne|Anne]] (according to some apocryphal writings)
}}
}}
{{Mary}}
{{Christianity|state=collapsed}}


'''Mary'''{{efn|{{lang-he|מִרְיָם|translit=Mīryām}}; {{lang-arc|ܡܪܝܡ|translit=Mariam}}; {{lang-ar|مريم|translit=Maryam}}; {{lang-grc|Μαρία|translit=María}}; {{lang-la|Maria}}; {{lang-cop|Ⲙⲁⲣⲓⲁ|translit=Maria}}}} was a first-century [[Judea|Judean]] woman of [[Nazareth]],<ref>{{cite book |title=Mary in the New Testament |author1=Raymond Edward Brown |author2=Joseph A. Fitzmyer |author3=Karl Paul Donfried |location=NJ |publisher=Paulist Press |year=1978 |page=140 |quote=...consonant with Mary's Jewish background |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ML1mnUBwmhcC&pg=PA140 |isbn=978-0809121687 |access-date=23 February 2021 |archive-date=17 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210817232637/https://books.google.com/books?id=ML1mnUBwmhcC&pg=PA140 |url-status=live }}</ref> the wife of [[Saint Joseph|Joseph]] and the mother of [[Jesus]]. She is a central figure of [[Christianity]], venerated under [[titles of Mary|various titles]] such as virgin or queen, many of them mentioned in the [[Litany of Loreto]]. The [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern]] and [[Oriental Orthodox]], [[Church of the East]], [[Catholic]], [[Anglican]], and [[Lutheran]] churches believe that Mary, as mother of Jesus, is the [[Theotokos|Mother of God]]. Other [[Protestant views on Mary]] vary, with some holding her to have considerably lesser status.
'''Mary'''{{efn|{{langx|he|מִרְיָם|translit=Mīryām}}; {{langx|syc|ܡܪܝܡ|translit=Maryam}}; {{langx|ar|مريم|translit=Maryam}}; {{langx|grc|Μαρία|translit=María}}; {{langx|la|Maria}}; {{langx|cop|Ⲙⲁⲣⲓⲁ|translit=Maria}}}} was a first-century [[Jewish]] woman of [[Nazareth]],<ref>{{cite book |last1=Brown |first1=Raymond Edward |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ML1mnUBwmhcC&pg=PA140 |title=Mary in the New Testament |last2=Fitzmyer |first2=Joseph A. |last3=Donfried |first3=Karl Paul |publisher=Paulist Press |year=1978 |isbn=978-0809121687 |location=NJ |page=140 |quote=...consonant with Mary's Jewish background |access-date=23 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210817232637/https://books.google.com/books?id=ML1mnUBwmhcC&pg=PA140 |archive-date=17 August 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> the wife of [[Saint Joseph|Joseph]] and the mother of [[Jesus]]. She is an important figure of [[Christianity]], venerated under [[titles of Mary, mother of Jesus|various titles]] such as [[Perpetual virginity of Mary|virgin]] or [[Queen of Heaven|queen]], many of which are mentioned in the [[Litany of Loreto]]. The [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern]] and [[Oriental Orthodox Churches|Oriental Orthodox]], [[Catholic Church|Catholic]], [[Lutheranism|Evangelical Lutheran]], [[Reformed Christianity|Reformed]], [[Anglican]], [[Methodist]] and [[Baptist]] churches believe that Mary, as mother of Jesus, is the [[Theotokos|Mother of God]]. The [[Church of the East]] historically regarded her as [[Christotokos]], a term still used in the liturgy of the [[Assyrian Church of the East]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Liturgy of the Assyrian Church of the East |url=https://www.liturgies.net/Liturgies/Other/LiturgyOfTheAssyrianChurch.htm |access-date=3 August 2024 |archive-date=14 March 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070314114228/https://www.liturgies.net/Liturgies/Other/LiturgyOfTheAssyrianChurch.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> She has the [[Mary in Islam|highest position in Islam]] among all women and is mentioned numerous times in the [[Quran]], including in a chapter (surah) [[Maryam (surah)|named after her]].<ref>Quran 3:42; cited in Stowasser, Barbara Freyer, "Mary", in: ''Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān'', General Editor: Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Georgetown University, Washington DC.</ref><ref>J. D. McAuliffe, ''Chosen of all women.''</ref><ref name="Jestice-2004">Jestice, Phyllis G. ''Holy people of the world: a cross-cultural encyclopedia, Volume 3''. 2004, {{ISBN|1-57607-355-6}}, p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=H5cQH17-HnMC&q=%22Sayyidana+Maryam%22&pg=PA558 558 Sayyidana Maryam]. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727115808/https://books.google.com/books?id=H5cQH17-HnMC&pg=PA558#v=onepage&q=%22Sayyidana%20Maryam%22&f=false|date=27 July 2020}}.</ref> She is also revered in the [[Baháʼí]] and [[Druze]] faiths.<ref name="Bowman-2012" />


The [[New Testament]] describes Mary as a young virgin{{efn|{{lang|grc|παρθένος|translit="parthénos"}}; Matthew 1:23<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:23}}</ref> uses the Greek {{transliteration|grc|parthénos}}, "virgin", whereas only the Hebrew of Isaiah 7:14,<ref>{{Bibleverse|Isaiah|7:14|HE}}</ref> from which the New Testament ostensibly quotes, as {{transliteration|hbo|Almah}} – "young maiden". See article on {{transliteration|grc|parthénos}} in Bauercc/(Arndt)/Gingrich/Danker, ''A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature''.<ref>Bauercc/(Arndt)/Gingrich/Danker, ''A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature'', 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, 1979, p. 627.</ref>}} who was chosen by [[God in Christianity|God]] to [[annunciation|conceive Jesus]] through the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]]. After [[nativity of Jesus|giving birth to Jesus]] in [[Bethlehem]], she raised him in the city of [[Nazareth]] in [[Galilee]], and was in [[Jerusalem]] at his [[crucifixion]] and with the [[Apostles in the New Testament|apostles]] after his [[Ascension of Jesus|ascension]]. Although her later life is not accounted in the Bible, [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] and [[Eastern Christianity|Eastern Christian]] traditions believe that her body [[Entering heaven alive|was raised]] into [[Heaven in Christianity|heaven]] at the end of her earthly life, which is known in [[Western Christianity]] as the [[Assumption of Mary]] and in [[Eastern Christianity]] as the [[Dormition of the Mother of God]].
The [[synoptic Gospels]] name Mary as the mother of Jesus. The gospels of [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] and [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] describe Mary as a virgin{{efn|{{langx|grc|παρθένος|translit="parthénos"}}; Matthew 1:23<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:23}}</ref> uses the Greek {{transliteration|grc|parthénos}}, "virgin", whereas only the Hebrew of Isaiah 7:14,<ref>{{Bibleverse|Isaiah|7:14|HE}}</ref> from which the New Testament ostensibly quotes, as {{transliteration|hbo|Almah}} – "young maiden". See article on {{transliteration|grc|parthénos}} in Bauercc/(Arndt)/Gingrich/Danker, ''A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature''.<ref>Bauercc/(Arndt)/Gingrich/Danker, ''A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature'', 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, 1979, p. 627.</ref>}} who was chosen by [[God in Christianity|God]] to [[annunciation|conceive Jesus]] through the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]]. After [[nativity of Jesus|giving birth to Jesus]] in [[Bethlehem]], she and her husband Joseph raised him in the city of Nazareth in [[Galilee]], and she was in [[Jerusalem]] at his [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucifixion]] and with the [[Apostles in the New Testament|apostles]] after his [[Ascension of Jesus|ascension]]. Although her later life is not accounted in the [[Bible]]; Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and some [[Protestantism|Protestant]] traditions believe that her body [[Entering heaven alive|was raised]] into [[Heaven in Christianity|heaven]] at the end of her earthly life, which is known in [[Western Christianity]] as the [[Assumption of Mary]] and in [[Eastern Christianity]] as the [[Dormition of the Mother of God]].


[[Veneration of Mary|Mary has been venerated]] since [[early Christianity]],<ref name="Burke, Raymond L. 2008 page 178">Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; (2008). ''Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons'' {{ISBN|978-1-57918-355-4}} p. 178</ref><ref name="Tim S. Perry page 142">''Mary for evangelicals'' by Tim S. Perry, William J. Abraham 2006 {{ISBN|0-8308-2569-X}} p. 142</ref> and is considered by millions to be the holiest and greatest [[saint]]. There is a certain diversity in the [[Mariology]] and devotional practices of major Christian traditions. The Catholic Church holds [[Mariology of the Catholic Church|distinctive Marian dogmas]], namely her [[Immaculate Conception]] and her Assumption into heaven.<ref name=Houghton>"Mary, the mother of Jesus." ''The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Houghton Mifflin''. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002. Credo Reference. Web. 28 September 2010.</ref> Many [[Protestantism|Protestants]] minimize Mary's role, based on what they argue is lack of biblical support for any beliefs other than her status as the [[Mother of God]] and the [[Virgin birth of Jesus|virgin birth]].<ref name=protestantencyclopedia /> She is mentioned several times in the [[Quran]], including in a chapter [[Maryam (surah)|named after her]], and has the [[Mary in Islam|highest position in Islam]] among all women.<ref>Quran 3:42; cited in Stowasser, Barbara Freyer, "Mary", in: ''Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān'', General Editor: Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Georgetown University, Washington DC.</ref><ref>J.D. McAuliffe, ''Chosen of all women''</ref><ref name="Jestice">Jestice, Phyllis G. ''Holy people of the world: a cross-cultural encyclopedia, Volume 3''. 2004 {{ISBN|1-57607-355-6}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=H5cQH17-HnMC&q=%22Sayyidana+Maryam%22&pg=PA558 558 Sayyidana Maryam] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727115808/https://books.google.com/books?id=H5cQH17-HnMC&pg=PA558#v=onepage&q=%22Sayyidana%20Maryam%22&f=false |date=27 July 2020 }}</ref>
[[Veneration of Mary|Mary has been venerated]] since [[early Christianity]],<ref>Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; (2008). ''Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons,'' {{ISBN|978-1-57918-355-4}}, p. 178.</ref><ref>''Mary for evangelicals'' by Tim S. Perry, William J. Abraham 2006 {{ISBN|0-8308-2569-X}} p. 142</ref> and is often considered to be the holiest and greatest [[saint]]. There is a certain diversity in the [[Mariology]] and devotional practices of major Christian traditions. The Catholic Church and some Oriental Orthodox Churches hold distinctive Marian [[Dogma in the Catholic Church#Dogma as divine and Catholic faith|dogmas]], namely her [[Immaculate Conception]] and her bodily assumption into heaven.<ref>"Mary, the mother of Jesus" ''The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Houghton Mifflin''. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002. Credo Reference. Web. 28 September 2010.</ref> Many [[Protestantism|Protestants]] hold [[Protestant views on Mary|various views of Mary's role]] that they perceive as being in accordance with the Scriptures.<ref name="Hillerbrand-2004" /><ref name="Wengert-2017"/> The [[Book of Concord|Confessions]] of the [[Lutheranism|Lutheran Churches]] have taught the [[Virgin birth of Jesus|virgin birth]], [[Theotokos]], and [[perpetual virginity of Mary|perpetual virginity]].<ref name="Smith-2010"/><ref name="Anderson-1992"/>


The multiple forms of [[Marian devotions]] include various [[Christian prayer|prayers]] and [[Hymns to Mary|hymns]], the celebration of several [[Marian feast days]] in [[Christian liturgy|liturgy]], the veneration of [[religious image|images]] and [[relics]], the construction of [[Catholic Marian church buildings|churches dedicated to Mary]] and [[Christian pilgrimage|pilgrimages]] to [[shrines to the Virgin Mary|Marian shrines]]. Many [[Marian apparition]]s and [[miracle]]s attributed to her [[intercession of saints|intercession]] have been reported by believers over the centuries. She has been a traditional [[Madonna (art)|subject in arts]], notably in [[Byzantine art]], [[medieval art]] and [[Renaissance art]].
The multiple forms of [[Marian devotions]] include various [[Christian prayer|prayers]] and [[Hymns to Mary|hymns]], the celebration of several [[Marian feast days]] in [[Christian liturgy|liturgy]],<ref name="Wengert-2017"/> the veneration of [[religious image|images]] and [[relics]], the construction of [[Catholic Marian church buildings|churches dedicated to her]] and [[Christian pilgrimage|pilgrimages]] to [[shrines to the Virgin Mary|Marian shrines]]. Many [[Marian apparition]]s and [[miracle]]s attributed to her [[intercession of saints|intercession]] have been reported by believers over the centuries. She has been a traditional [[Madonna (art)|subject in arts]], notably in [[Byzantine art]], [[medieval art]] and [[Renaissance art]].


==Names and titles==
==Names and titles==
{{Main|Titles of Mary}}
{{Main|Titles of Mary}}
[[File:Encaustic Virgin.jpg|thumb|right|Virgin and Child with angels and Sts. George and Theodore. Icon, {{circa|600}}, from [[Saint Catherine's Monastery]]]]
 
Mary's name in the original manuscripts of the New Testament was based on her original [[Aramaic language|Aramaic]] name {{Lang|arc|מרים|rtl=yes}}, transliterated as {{transliteration|arc|[[Maryam (name)|Maryam]]}} or {{transliteration|arc|Mariam}}.<ref>"Mary", ''A Dictionary of First Names'' by Patrick Hanks, Kate Hardcastle and Flavia Hodges (2006). Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0198610602}}.</ref> The English name ''[[Mary (name)|Mary]]'' comes from the Greek {{lang|grc|Μαρία}}, a shortened form of the name {{lang|grc|Μαριάμ}}. Both {{lang|grc|Μαρία}} and {{lang|grc|Μαριάμ}} appear in the New Testament.
[[File:Encaustic Virgin.jpg|thumb|right|Virgin and Child with angels and Sts. George and Theodore. Icon, {{circa|600}}, from [[Saint Catherine's Monastery]].]]
{{Mary|state=collapsed}}
 
Mary's name in the original manuscripts of the [[New Testament]] was based on her original [[Aramaic language|Aramaic]] name {{Lang|arc|מרים|rtl=yes}}, transliterated as {{transliteration|arc|[[Maryam (name)|Maryam]]}} or {{transliteration|arc|Mariam}}.<ref>"Mary", ''A Dictionary of First Names'' by Patrick Hanks, Kate Hardcastle and Flavia Hodges (2006). Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0198610602}}.</ref> The English name ''[[Mary (name)|Mary]]'' comes from the Greek {{lang|grc|Μαρία}}, a shortened form of the name {{lang|grc|Μαριάμ}}. Both {{lang|grc|Μαρία}} and {{lang|grc|Μαριάμ}} appear in the New Testament.


===In Christianity===
===In Christianity===


In Christianity, Mary is commonly referred to as the Virgin Mary, in accordance with the belief that the [[Holy Spirit (Christianity)|Holy Spirit]] impregnated her, thereby conceiving her first-born son Jesus [[Miraculous births|miraculously]], without [[sexual relations]] with her betrothed/husband Joseph, "until her son [Jesus] was born".<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|1:25}}</ref> The word "until" has inspired considerable analysis on whether Joseph and Mary produced [[Brothers of Jesus|siblings]] after the birth of Jesus or not.{{efn|See Sabine R. Huebner's succinct analysis of the issue: "Jesus is described as the 'first-born son' of Mary in Mt 1:25 and Lk 2:7. From this wording alone we can conclude that there were later-born sons […] The family […] had at least five sons and an unknown number of daughters."<ref>Sabine R. Huebner, ''Papyri and the Social World of the New Testament'' (Cambridge University Press, 2019), p. 73. {{ISBN|1108470254}}</ref>}}
In Christianity, Mary is commonly referred to as the Virgin Mary, in accordance with the belief that the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]] impregnated her, thereby conceiving her first-born son Jesus [[Miraculous births|miraculously]], without sexual relations with her betrothed Joseph, "until her son [Jesus] was born".<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|1:25}}</ref> The word "until" has inspired considerable analysis on whether Joseph and Mary produced [[Brothers of Jesus|siblings]] after the birth of Jesus or not.{{efn|See [[Sabine R. Huebner]]'s succinct analysis of the issue: "Jesus is described as the 'first-born son' of Mary in Mt 1:25 and Lk 2:7. From this wording alone we can conclude that there were later-born sons ... The family ... had at least five sons and an unknown number of daughters."<ref>[[Sabine R. Huebner]], ''Papyri and the Social World of the New Testament'' (Cambridge University Press, 2019), p. 73. {{ISBN|1108470254}}</ref>}} Among her many other names and titles are the [[Veneration of Mary in the Catholic Church|Blessed Virgin Mary]] (often abbreviated to "BVM" after the [[Latin]] {{lang|la|Beata Maria Virgo}}),<ref>{{citation|author=Fulbert of Chatres|author-link=Fulbert of Chartres|title=O Beata Virgo Maria|url=https://www.preces-latinae.org/thesaurus/BVM/OBeataVM.html|access-date=27 March 2020|archive-date=4 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304020702/https://www.preces-latinae.org/thesaurus/BVM/OBeataVM.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Saint]] Mary (occasionally), the [[Theotokos|Mother of God]] (primarily in [[Western Christianity]]), the {{transliteration|grc|[[Theotokos]]}} (primarily in [[Eastern Christianity]]), Our Lady (Medieval {{Langx|it|Madonna}}), and [[Queen of Heaven]] ({{lang|la|Regina caeli}}; see also [[Regina Coeli (disambiguation)|here]]).<ref>''Encyclopedia of Catholicism by Frank K. Flinn'', J. Gordon Melton, 2007, {{ISBN|0-8160-5455-X}}, pp. 443–444</ref><ref name="Hillerbrand-2003">Hillerbrand, Hans Joachim. ''Encyclopedia of Protestantism'', Volume 3, 2003. {{ISBN|0-415-92472-3}}, p. 1174</ref> The title "[[Queen of heaven (antiquity)|queen of heaven]]" had previously been used as an [[epithet]] for a number of goddesses, such as [[Isis]], or [[Ishtar]].
Among her many other names and titles are the [[Veneration of Mary in the Catholic Church|Blessed Virgin Mary]] (often abbreviated to "BVM", or "BMV" after the [[Latin]] {{lang|la|"Beata Maria Virgo"}}),<ref>{{citation|author=Fulbert of Chatres|author-link=Fulbert of Chartres|title=O Beata Virgo Maria|url=https://www.preces-latinae.org/thesaurus/BVM/OBeataVM.html|access-date=27 March 2020|archive-date=4 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304020702/https://www.preces-latinae.org/thesaurus/BVM/OBeataVM.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Saint]] Mary (occasionally), the [[Mother of God]] (primarily in [[Western Christianity]]), the {{transliteration|grc|[[Theotokos]]}} (primarily in [[Eastern Christianity]]), Our Lady (Medieval {{Lang-it|Madonna}}), and [[Queen of Heaven]] ({{lang|la|Regina caeli}}; see also [[Regina Coeli (disambiguation)|here]]).<ref>''Encyclopedia of Catholicism by Frank K. Flinn'', J. Gordon Melton, 2007, {{ISBN|0-8160-5455-X}}, pp. 443–444</ref><ref name="Hillerbrand">Hillerbrand, Hans Joachim. ''Encyclopedia of Protestantism'', Volume 3, 2003. {{ISBN|0-415-92472-3}}, p. 1174</ref> The title "[[Queen of heaven (antiquity)|queen of heaven]]" had previously been used as an [[epithet]] for a number of ancient sky-goddesses, such as [[Astarte|''Nin-anna'', Astarte, Ishtar]] and Astoreth, the [[Ancient Canaanite religion|Canaanite]] sky-goddess worshipped during the Hebrew prophet Jeremiah's lifetime.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Jeremiah|44:17–19}}</ref>


Titles in use vary among [[Anglican Marian theology|Anglicans]], [[Luther's Marian theology|Lutherans]], [[Roman Catholic Mariology|Catholics]], [[Orthodox Marian theology|Orthodox]], [[Protestant views on Mary|Protestants]], [[Latter Day Saint views on Mary|Mormons]], and [[Ecumenical views of Mary|other Christians]].
Titles in use vary among [[Anglican Marian theology|Anglicans]], [[Luther's Marian theology|Lutherans]] and other [[Protestant views on Mary|Protestants]], as well as [[Latter Day Saint views on Mary|Mormons]], [[Roman Catholic Mariology|Catholics]], [[Orthodox Marian theology|Orthodox]] and [[Ecumenical meetings and documents on Mary|other Christians]].


The three main titles for Mary used by the Orthodox are {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} ({{lang|grc|Θεοτόκος|lit=God-bearer}} or "God-bearer"), {{transliteration|grc|[[Aeiparthenos]]}} ({{lang|grc|ἀειπαρθένος|lit=Ever-virgin}}) which means ever-virgin, as confirmed in the [[Second Council of Constantinople]] in 553, and {{transliteration|grc|[[Panagia]]}} ({{lang|grc|Παναγία|lit=All-holy}}) meaning "all-holy".<ref name="Fairbairn" /> Catholics use a wide variety of titles for Mary, and these titles have in turn given rise to many artistic depictions.
The three main titles for Mary used by the Orthodox are {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} ({{lang|grc|Θεοτόκος}} or "God-bearer"), {{transliteration|grc|[[Aeiparthenos]]}} ({{lang|grc|ἀειπαρθένος}}) which means ever-virgin, as confirmed in the [[Second Council of Constantinople]] in 553, and {{transliteration|grc|[[Panagia]]}} ({{lang|grc|Παναγία}}) meaning "all-holy".<ref name="Fairbairn-2002" /> Catholics use a wide variety of titles for Mary, and these titles have in turn given rise to many artistic depictions.


The title {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, which means "God-bearer," was recognized at the [[Council of Ephesus]] in 431.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Longenecker |first1=Father Dwight |title=God-bearer |url=https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/god-bearer |website=Catholic Answers |access-date=30 July 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Council of Ephesus |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05491a.htm |website=New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia |access-date=30 July 2022}}</ref> The direct equivalents of title in Latin are {{lang|la|Deipara}} and {{lang|la|Dei Genitrix}}, although the phrase is more often loosely translated into Latin as {{lang|la|Mater Dei}} ("Mother of God"), with similar patterns for other languages used in the [[Latin Church]]. However, this same phrase in Greek ({{lang|grc|Μήτηρ Θεοῦ}}), in the abbreviated form {{lang|grc|ΜΡ ΘΥ}}, is an indication commonly attached to her image in [[Eastern Christianity|Byzantine]] [[icon]]s. The Council stated that the [[Church Fathers]] "did not hesitate to speak of the holy Virgin as the Mother of God".<ref name="ccel.org">{{cite web|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.x.xvi.i.html|title=The Canons of the Two Hundred Holy and Blessed Fathers Who Met at Ephesus|date=1 June 2005|publisher=Ccel.org|access-date=30 September 2013|archive-date=17 June 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100617221958/https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.x.xvi.i.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>M'Corry, John Stewart''Theotokos: Or, the Divine Maternity''. 2009 {{ISBN|1-113-18361-6}} p. 10</ref><ref>''The Christian theology reader'' by Alister E. McGrath 2006 {{ISBN|1-4051-5358-X}} p. 273</ref>
The title {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, which means "God-bearer", was recognized at the [[Council of Ephesus]] in 431.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Longenecker |first1=Father Dwight |title=God-bearer |url=https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/god-bearer |website=Catholic Answers |access-date=30 July 2022 |archive-date=30 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730161135/https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/god-bearer |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Council of Ephesus |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05491a.htm |website=New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia |access-date=30 July 2022 |archive-date=18 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220718154429/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05491a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> The direct equivalents of title in Latin are {{lang|la|Deipara}} and {{lang|la|Dei Genitrix}}, although the phrase is more often loosely translated into Latin as {{lang|la|Mater Dei}} ("Mother of God"), with similar patterns for other languages used in the [[Latin Church]]. However, this same phrase in Greek ({{lang|grc|Μήτηρ Θεοῦ}}), in the abbreviated form {{lang|grc|ΜΡ ΘΥ}}, is an indication commonly attached to her image in [[Eastern Christianity|Byzantine]] [[icon]]s. The Council stated that the [[Church Fathers]] "did not hesitate to speak of the holy Virgin as the Mother of God".<ref name="ccel.org">{{cite web|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.x.xvi.i.html|title=The Canons of the Two Hundred Holy and Blessed Fathers Who Met at Ephesus|date=1 June 2005|publisher=Ccel.org|access-date=30 September 2013|archive-date=17 June 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100617221958/https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.x.xvi.i.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>M'Corry, John Stewart''Theotokos: Or, the Divine Maternity''. 2009 {{ISBN|1-113-18361-6}} p. 10</ref><ref>''The Christian theology reader'' by Alister E. McGrath 2006 {{ISBN|1-4051-5358-X}} p. 273</ref>


Some Marian titles have a direct [[Bible|scriptural]] basis. For instance, the title "Queen Mother" has been given to Mary, as she was the mother of Jesus, sometimes referred to as the "King of Kings" due to his ancestral descent from [[David|King David]].<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|1:32}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|Isaiah|9:6}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|1 Kings|2:19–20}}</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse|Jeremiah|13:18–19}}</ref><ref>''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' by Terrence J. McNally {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} p. 128</ref> This is also based on the Hebrew tradition of the "Queen-Mother," the [[Gebirah]] or "Great Lady."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hahn |first1=Scott |title=Hail, Holy Queen: The Mother of God in the Word of God |date= 2006 |publisher=Image |isbn=978-0385501699 |page=78 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Scott |title=What You Need to Know About Mary: But Were Never Taught |date=2018 |publisher=Holy Water Books |isbn=978-0998360324 |page=87 }}</ref> Other titles have arisen from [[Miracle|reported miracles]], special appeals, or occasions for calling on Mary.{{efn|To give a few examples, [[Our Lady of Good Counsel]], [[Our Lady of Navigators]], and [[Mary Untier of Knots|Our Lady Undoer of Knots]] fit this description.<ref name="Jameson">''Legends of the Madonna'' by Anna Jameson 2009 {{ISBN|1406853380}} p. 50</ref><ref>Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices'' {{ISBN|0-87973-910-X}} p. 515</ref><ref>Candice Lee Goucher, 2007 ''World history: journeys from past to present'' {{ISBN|0-415-77137-4}} p. 102</ref><ref>Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices'' {{ISBN|0-87973-910-X}} p. 525</ref>}}
Some Marian titles have a direct [[Bible|scriptural]] basis. For instance, the title "Queen Mother" has been given to Mary, as she was the mother of Jesus, sometimes referred to as the "King of Kings" due to his ancestral descent from [[David|King David]].<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|1:32}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|Isaiah|9:6}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|1 Kings|2:19–20}}</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse|Jeremiah|13:18–19}}</ref><ref>''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' by Terrence J. McNally {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} p. 128</ref> This is also based on the Hebrew tradition of the "Queen-Mother", the [[Gebirah]] or "Great Lady".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hahn |first1=Scott |title=Hail, Holy Queen: The Mother of God in the Word of God |date= 2006 |publisher=Image |isbn=978-0385501699 |page=78 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Scott |title=What You Need to Know About Mary: But Were Never Taught |date=2018 |publisher=Holy Water Books |isbn=978-0998360324 |page=87 }}</ref> Other titles have arisen from [[Miracle|reported miracles]], special appeals, or occasions for calling on Mary.{{efn|To give a few examples, [[Our Lady of Good Counsel]], [[Our Lady of Navigators]], and [[Mary Untier of Knots|Our Lady Undoer of Knots]] fit this description.<ref>''Legends of the Madonna'' by Anna Jameson 2009 {{ISBN|1406853380}} p. 50</ref><ref>Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices'' {{ISBN|0-87973-910-X}} p. 515</ref><ref>Candice Lee Goucher, 2007 ''World history: journeys from past to present'' {{ISBN|0-415-77137-4}} p. 102</ref><ref>Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices'' {{ISBN|0-87973-910-X}} p. 525</ref>}}


===In Islam===
===In Islam===
{{Main|Mary in Islam}}
{{Main|Mary in Islam}}
In [[Islam]], Mary is known as [[Mary in Islam|Maryam]] ({{lang-ar|مريم|translit=Maryam}}), mother of [[Jesus in Islam|Isa]] ({{lang|ar|عيسى بن مريم|translit=ʿĪsā ibn Maryām|lit=Jesus, son of Mary}}). She is often referred to by the honorific title {{transliteration|ar|"Sayyidatuna"}}, meaning "Our Lady"; this title is in parallel to {{transliteration|ar|"Sayyiduna"}} ("Our Lord"), used for the prophets.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|year=2008|title=Mary|encyclopedia=The New Encyclopedia of Islam|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.|location=Plymouth, United Kingdom|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D7tu12gt4JYC|access-date=2 June 2016|last=Glassé|first=Cyril|edition=3rd|pages=340–341|isbn=978-0742562967|archive-date=17 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191117195626/https://books.google.com/books?id=D7tu12gt4JYC|url-status=live}}</ref> A related term of endearment is {{transliteration|ar|"Siddiqah"}},<ref>{{qref|5|73-75|b=y}}</ref> meaning "she who confirms the truth" and "she who believes sincerely completely". Another title for Mary is {{transliteration|ar|"Qānitah"}}, which signifies both constant submission to God and absorption in prayer and invocation in Islam.<ref name="qref|66|12|b=y">{{qref|66|12|b=y|t=si}}</ref> She is also called {{transliteration|ar|"Tahira"}}, meaning "one who has been purified" and representing her status as one of two humans in creation (and the only woman) to not be touched by [[Satan]] at any point.<ref>{{qref|3|36|b=y}}</ref> In the Quran, she is described both as "the daughter of Imran and "the sister of Aaron".<ref>{{qref|19|28|b=y}}</ref>
 
[[File:Virgin Mary Painting by Hossein Nuri.jpg|thumb|''Virgin Mary'' depicted by Muslim painter [[Hossein Nuri#Virgin Mary painting|Hossein Nuri]]]]
In [[Islam]], Mary is known as [[Mary in Islam|Maryam]] ({{langx|ar|مريم|translit=Maryam}}), mother of [[Jesus in Islam|Isa]] ({{lang|ar|عيسى بن مريم}}, {{transliteration|ar|ʿĪsā ibn Maryām}}, {{literal translation|Jesus, son of Mary}}). She is often referred to by the honorific title {{transliteration|ar|"Sayyidatuna"}}, meaning "Our Lady"; this title is in parallel to {{transliteration|ar|"Sayyiduna"}} ("Our Lord"), used for the prophets.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|year=2008|title=Mary|encyclopedia=The New Encyclopedia of Islam|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.|location=Plymouth, United Kingdom|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D7tu12gt4JYC|access-date=2 June 2016|last=Glassé|first=Cyril|edition=3rd|pages=340–341|isbn=978-0742562967|archive-date=17 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191117195626/https://books.google.com/books?id=D7tu12gt4JYC|url-status=live}}</ref> A related term of endearment is {{transliteration|ar|"Siddiqah"}},<ref>{{qref|5|73-75|b=y}}</ref> meaning "she who confirms the truth" and "she who believes sincerely completely". Another title for Mary is {{transliteration|ar|"Qānitah"}}, which signifies both constant submission to God and absorption in prayer and invocation in Islam.<ref name="qref|66|12|b=y">{{qref|66|12|b=y|t=si}}</ref> She is also called {{transliteration|ar|"Tahira"}}, meaning "one who has been purified" and representing her status as one of two humans in creation to not be touched by [[Iblis|Satan]] at any point, the other being Jesus.<ref name="qref|3|36|b=y">{{qref|3|36|b=y}}</ref> In the [[Quran]], she is described both as "the daughter of Imran" and "the sister of Aaron" and Moses, alluding to [[Miriam]] from the [[Hebrew Bible]].<ref>{{qref|19|28|b=y}}</ref> However, the title of "the sister of Aaron" is confirmed to be metaphorical (which is a common [[figure of speech]] in [[Arabic]]) as per a [[Hadith]] from the [[Islam]]ic prophet [[Muhammad]] explaining Mary was indeed named after Miriam.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Elias |first=Abu Amina |date=6 October 2012 |title=Hadith on Maryam: Why Mary is called sister of Aaron |url=https://www.abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadithonline/2012/10/05/sister-harun-quran/ |access-date=18 November 2024 |website=www.abuaminaelias.com |language=en-US}}</ref>


==Life in ancient sources==
==Life in ancient sources==
Line 54: Line 58:


=== New Testament ===
=== New Testament ===
The [[canonical Gospels]] and the [[Acts of the Apostles]] are the [[primary source]]s of historical information about Mary.<ref name="hesemann"/><ref name="canales"/> They are almost contemporary sources, as the [[synoptic Gospels]] and the Acts of the Apostles are generally considered dating from around AD 66–90, while the [[gospel of John]] would date from AD 90–110. They provide limited information about Mary, as they primarily focus on the teaching of [[Jesus]] and on [[apostles in the New Testament|his apostles]].<ref name="hesemann"/> The [[historical reliability of the Gospels]] and [[historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles]] are subject to debate, as it was common practice in early Christian writings to mix historical facts with legendary stories.<ref name="hesemann">{{cite book |last= Hesemann |first= Michael |author-link=Michael Hesemann |date=2016 |title= Mary of Nazareth: History, Archaeology, Legends|url= |location= |publisher=Ignatius |page=4 |isbn=978-1621640905}}</ref>
The [[canonical Gospels]] and the [[Acts of the Apostles]] are the [[primary source]]s of historical information about Mary.<ref name="Hesemann-2016"/><ref name="Canales-2010"/> They are almost contemporary sources, as the [[synoptic Gospels]] and the Acts of the Apostles are generally considered dating from around AD 66–90, while the [[gospel of John]] dates from AD 90–110. They provide limited information about Mary, as they primarily focus on the teaching of [[Jesus]] and on [[apostles in the New Testament|his apostles]].<ref name="Hesemann-2016"/> The [[historical reliability of the Gospels]] and [[historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles]] are subject to debate, as it was common practice in early Christian writings to mix historical facts with legendary stories.<ref name="Hesemann-2016">{{cite book |last= Hesemann |first= Michael |author-link=Michael Hesemann |date=2016 |title= Mary of Nazareth: History, Archaeology, Legends|url= |location= |publisher=Ignatius |page=4 |isbn=978-1621640905}}</ref>


The earliest New Testament account of Mary is in the [[epistle to the Galatians]], which was written before the [[gospels]]. She is referred to as "a woman" and is not named: "But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law" (Galatians 4:4).<ref name="canales">{{cite web |url= https://www.smp.org/dynamicmedia/files/67270a1eefafe0f8457d559592c79a4f/TX001252_1-Background-Mary_of_Nazareth.pdf|title= Mary of Nazareth |last=Canales |first=Arthur David |date=2010 |website= |publisher=Saint Mary's Press|access-date= 25 October 2022}}</ref>
The earliest New Testament account of Mary is in the [[epistle to the Galatians]], which was written before the [[gospels]]. She is referred to as "a woman" and is not named: "But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law" (Galatians 4:4).<ref name="Canales-2010">{{cite web |url=https://www.smp.org/dynamicmedia/files/67270a1eefafe0f8457d559592c79a4f/TX001252_1-Background-Mary_of_Nazareth.pdf |title=Mary of Nazareth |last=Canales |first=Arthur David |date=2010 |website= |publisher=Saint Mary's Press |access-date=25 October 2022 |archive-date=25 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221025165134/https://www.smp.org/dynamicmedia/files/67270a1eefafe0f8457d559592c79a4f/TX001252_1-Background-Mary_of_Nazareth.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref>


Mary is mentioned several times in the canonical Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles:
Mary is mentioned several times in the canonical Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles:
*The [[Gospel of Luke]] mentions Mary the most often, identifying her by name twelve times, all of these in the infancy narrative (Luke 1:27–2:34).<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:27–2:34}}</ref>
*The [[Gospel of Luke]] mentions Mary the most often, identifying her by name twelve times, all of these in the infancy narrative (Luke 1:27–2:34).<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:27–2:34}}</ref>
*The [[Gospel of Matthew]] mentions her by name five times, four of these (1:16, 18, 20: 2:12)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:16–2:12}}</ref> in the infancy narrative and only once (Matthew 13:55)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|13:55}}</ref> outside the infancy narrative.
*The [[Gospel of Matthew]] mentions her by name five times, four of these (1:16, 18, 20; 2:11)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:16–2:11}}</ref> in the infancy narrative and once (Matthew 13:55)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|13:55}}</ref> outside the infancy narrative.
*The [[Gospel of Mark]] names her once (Mark 6:3)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|6:3|ESV}}</ref> and mentions Jesus' mother without naming her in Mark 3:31–32.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|3:31–32}}</ref>
*The [[Gospel of Mark]] names her once (Mark 6:3)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|6:3|ESV}}</ref> and mentions Jesus' mother without naming her in Mark 3:31–32.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|3:31–32}}</ref>
*The [[Gospel of John]] refers to the mother of Jesus twice, but never mentions her name. She is first seen at the [[Marriage at Cana|wedding at Cana]] (John 2:1–12).<ref name="auto">{{Bibleverse|John|2:1–12}}</ref> The second reference has her standing near the cross of Jesus together with [[Mary Magdalene]], [[Mary of Clopas]] (or Cleophas), and her own sister (possibly the same as Mary of Clopas; the wording is semantically ambiguous), along with the "[[disciple whom Jesus loved]]" (John 19:25–26).<ref name="auto1">{{Bibleverse|John|19:25–26}}</ref> John 2:1–12<ref name="auto"/> is the only text in the canonical gospels in which the adult Jesus has a conversation with Mary. He does not address her as "Mother" but as "Woman". In [[Koine Greek]] (the language that the Gospel of John was composed in), calling one's mother "Woman" was not disrespectful, and could even be tender.<ref>William Temple, ''Readings in St John's Gospel.'' London: MacMillan, 1961. pp. 35, 36</ref> Accordingly, some versions of the Bible translate it as "Dear woman".<ref>{{bibleverse|John|2:4|NLT;NCV;AMP}}</ref>
*The [[Gospel of John]] refers to the mother of Jesus twice, but never mentions her name. She is first seen at the [[Marriage at Cana|wedding at Cana]] (John 2:1–12).<ref name="John 2">{{Bibleverse|John|2:1–12}}</ref> The second reference has her standing near the cross of Jesus together with [[Mary Magdalene]], [[Mary of Clopas]] (or Cleophas), and her own sister (possibly the same as Mary of Clopas; the wording is semantically ambiguous), along with the "[[disciple whom Jesus loved]]" (John 19:25–26).<ref name="John 19">{{Bibleverse|John|19:25–26}}</ref> John 2:1–12<ref name="John 2"/> is the only text in the canonical gospels in which the adult Jesus has a conversation with Mary. He does not address her as "Mother" but as "Woman". In [[Koine Greek]] (the language that the Gospel of John was composed in), calling one's mother "Woman" was not disrespectful, and could even be tender.<ref>William Temple, ''Readings in St John's Gospel.'' London, England: MacMillan, 1961. pp. 35, 36.</ref> Accordingly, some versions of the Bible translate it as "Dear woman".<ref>{{bibleverse|John|2:4|NLT;NCV;AMP}}</ref>
*In the [[Acts of the Apostles]], Mary and the [[brothers of Jesus]] are mentioned in the company of the eleven apostles who are gathered in the [[Cenacle|upper room]] after the [[Ascension of Jesus]] (Acts 1:14).<ref>{{Bibleverse|Acts|1:14}}</ref>
*In the [[Acts of the Apostles]], Mary and the [[brothers of Jesus]] are mentioned in the company of the eleven apostles who are gathered in the [[Cenacle|upper room]] after the [[Ascension of Jesus]] (Acts 1:14).<ref>{{Bibleverse|Acts|1:14}}</ref>


Line 70: Line 74:
{{Further|Genealogy of Jesus}}
{{Further|Genealogy of Jesus}}
[[File:Virgin's first seven steps.jpg|thumb|The Virgin's first seven steps, mosaic from [[Chora Church]], {{circa|12th century}}]]
[[File:Virgin's first seven steps.jpg|thumb|The Virgin's first seven steps, mosaic from [[Chora Church]], {{circa|12th century}}]]
The New Testament tells little of Mary's early history. The Gospel of Matthew does give a genealogy for Jesus by his father's paternal line, only identifying Mary as the wife of Joseph. John 19:25<ref>{{bibleverse|John|19:25}}</ref> states that Mary had a sister; semantically it is unclear if this sister is the same as [[Mary of Clopas]], or if she is left unnamed. [[Jerome]] identifies Mary of Clopas as the sister of Mary, mother of Jesus.<ref>{{cite web|title=Church Fathers: The Perpetual Virginity of Mary (Jerome)|url=https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3007.htm|website=www.newadvent.org|access-date=9 December 2016|archive-date=5 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180805183356/https://newadvent.org/fathers/3007.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> According to the early 2nd century historian [[Hegesippus (chronicler)|Hegesippus]], Mary of Clopas was likely Mary's sister-in-law, understanding Clopas (Cleophas) to have been Joseph's brother.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.catholic.org/encyclopedia/view.php?id=12101|title=The Blessed Virgin Mary – Encyclopedia Volume – Catholic Encyclopedia – Catholic Online|website=Catholic Online|access-date=7 April 2014|archive-date=20 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210520002215/https://www.catholic.org/encyclopedia/view.php?id=12101|url-status=live}}</ref>
The New Testament tells little of Mary's early history. The Gospel of Matthew gives a genealogy for Jesus by his father's paternal line, only identifying Mary as the wife of Joseph. John 19:25<ref>{{bibleverse|John|19:25}}</ref> states that Mary had a sister; semantically it is unclear if this sister is the same as [[Mary of Clopas]], or if she is left unnamed. [[Jerome]] identifies Mary of Clopas as the sister of Mary, mother of Jesus.<ref>{{cite web|title=Church Fathers: The Perpetual Virginity of Mary (Jerome)|url=https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3007.htm|website=New Advent|access-date=9 December 2016|archive-date=5 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180805183356/https://newadvent.org/fathers/3007.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> According to the early 2nd century historian [[Hegesippus (chronicler)|Hegesippus]], Mary of Clopas was likely Mary's sister-in-law, understanding Clopas (Cleophas) to have been Joseph's brother.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.catholic.org/encyclopedia/view.php?id=12101|title=The Blessed Virgin Mary – Encyclopedia Volume – Catholic Encyclopedia |website=Catholic Online|access-date=7 April 2014|archive-date=20 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210520002215/https://www.catholic.org/encyclopedia/view.php?id=12101|url-status=live}}</ref>


According to the writer of Luke, Mary was a relative of [[Elisabeth (biblical person)|Elizabeth]], wife of the priest [[Zechariah (priest)|Zechariah]] of the priestly division of [[Abijah]], who was herself part of the [[Daughter of Aaron|lineage of Aaron]] and so of the [[Tribe of Levi]].<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:5|NRSV}},{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:36|NRSV}}</ref> Some of those who believe that the relationship with Elizabeth was on the maternal side, believe that Mary, like Joseph, was of the royal [[Davidic line]] and so of the [[Tribe of Judah]], and that the [[genealogy of Jesus]] presented in [[Luke 3]] from [[Nathan (son of David)|Nathan]], is in fact the genealogy of Mary, while the genealogy from [[Solomon]] given in [[Matthew 1]] is that of Joseph.<ref>{{Cite book | last1 = Douglas | last2 = Hillyer | last3 = Bruce | title = New Bible Dictionary | publisher = Inter-varsity Press | year = 1990 | page = [https://archive.org/details/newbibledictiona00jddo/page/746 746] | isbn = 978-0-85110-630-4 | url = https://archive.org/details/newbibledictiona00jddo/page/746 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06410a.htm |title=New Advent Genealogy of Christ |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=1 September 1909 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=7 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507023753/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06410a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Henry|first1=Matthew|title=Luke in Matthew Henry commentary on the whole Bible (complete)|date=1706|url=https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/mhc/Luk/Luk_003.cfm?a=976001|access-date=18 April 2016|archive-date=18 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210718212445/https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/mhc/Luk/Luk_003.cfm?a=976001|url-status=live}}</ref> (Aaron's wife [[Elisheba]] was of the tribe of Judah, so all their descendants are from both Levi and Judah.)<ref>{{bibleverse|Numbers|1:7}}; {{bibleverse|Exodus|6:23}}</ref>
According to the writer of Luke, Mary was a relative of [[Elisabeth (biblical person)|Elizabeth]], wife of the priest [[Zechariah (priest)|Zechariah]] of the priestly division of [[Abijah]], who was herself part of the [[Daughter of Aaron|lineage of Aaron]] and so of the [[Tribe of Levi]].<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:5|NRSV}},{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:36|NRSV}}</ref> Some of those who believe that the relationship with Elizabeth was on the maternal side, believe that Mary, like Joseph, was of the royal [[Davidic line]] and so of the [[Tribe of Judah]], and that the [[genealogy of Jesus]] presented in [[Luke 3]] from [[Nathan (son of David)|Nathan]], is in fact the genealogy of Mary, while the genealogy from [[Solomon]] given in [[Matthew 1]] is that of Joseph.<ref>{{Cite book | last1 = Douglas | last2 = Hillyer | last3 = Bruce | title = New Bible Dictionary | publisher = Inter-varsity Press | year = 1990 | page = [https://archive.org/details/newbibledictiona00jddo/page/746 746] | isbn = 978-0-85110-630-4 | url = https://archive.org/details/newbibledictiona00jddo/page/746 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06410a.htm |title=New Advent Genealogy of Christ |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=1 September 1909 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=7 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507023753/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06410a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Henry|first1=Matthew|title=Luke in Matthew Henry commentary on the whole Bible (complete)|date=1706|url=https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/mhc/Luk/Luk_003.cfm?a=976001|access-date=18 April 2016|archive-date=18 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210718212445/https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/mhc/Luk/Luk_003.cfm?a=976001|url-status=live}}</ref> (Aaron's wife [[Elisheba]] was of the tribe of Judah, so all their descendants are from both Levi and Judah.)<ref>{{bibleverse|Numbers|1:7}}; {{bibleverse|Exodus|6:23}}</ref>
Line 76: Line 80:
====Annunciation====
====Annunciation====
{{Main|Annunciation}}
{{Main|Annunciation}}
Mary resided in "her own house"<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|1:56}}</ref> in [[Nazareth]] in [[Galilee]], possibly with her parents, and during her betrothal—the first stage of a [[Jewish view of marriage|Jewish marriage]]. Jewish girls were considered marriageable at the age of twelve years and six months, though the actual age of the bride varied with circumstances. The marriage was preceded by the betrothal, after which the bride legally belonged to the bridegroom, though she did not live with him till about a year later, when the marriage was celebrated.<ref name="auto2">{{cite web|url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: The Blessed Virgin Mary |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=1 October 1912 |accessdate=22 June 2022}}</ref>
 
Mary resided in "her own house"<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|1:56}}</ref> in [[Nazareth]] in [[Galilee]], possibly with her parents, and during her betrothal—the first stage of a [[Jewish view of marriage|Jewish marriage]]. Jewish girls were considered marriageable at the age of twelve years and six months, though the actual age of the bride varied with circumstances. The marriage was preceded by the betrothal, after which the bride legally belonged to the bridegroom, though she did not live with him till about a year later, when the marriage was celebrated.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: The Blessed Virgin Mary |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=1 October 1912 |accessdate=22 June 2022 |archive-date=10 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010170332/http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>


The [[angel]] Gabriel announced to her that she was to be the mother of the promised [[Messiah]] by conceiving him through the Holy Spirit, and, after initially expressing incredulity at the announcement, she responded, "I am the handmaid of the Lord. Let it be done unto me according to your word."<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|1:35}}</ref>{{efn|This event is described by some Christians as the Annunciation.}} Joseph planned to quietly divorce her, but was told her conception was by the Holy Spirit in a dream by "an angel of the Lord"; the angel told him to not hesitate to take her as his wife, which Joseph did, thereby formally completing the wedding rites.<ref>Mills, Watson E., Roger Aubrey Bullard. ''Mercer dictionary of the Bible''. 1998 {{ISBN|0-86554-373-9}} p. 429</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:18–25}}</ref>
The [[angel]] Gabriel announced to her that she was to be the mother of the promised [[Messiah]] by conceiving him through the Holy Spirit, and, after initially expressing incredulity at the announcement, she responded, "I am the handmaid of the Lord. Let it be done unto me according to your word."<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|1:35}}</ref>{{efn|This event is described by some Christians as the Annunciation.}} Joseph planned to quietly divorce her, but was told her conception was by the Holy Spirit in a dream by "an angel of the Lord"; the angel told him to not hesitate to take her as his wife, which Joseph did, thereby formally completing the wedding rites.<ref>Mills, Watson E., Roger Aubrey Bullard. ''Mercer dictionary of the Bible''. 1998 {{ISBN|0-86554-373-9}} p. 429</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:18–25}}</ref>
Line 84: Line 89:
====Birth of Jesus====
====Birth of Jesus====
{{Main|Nativity of Jesus}}
{{Main|Nativity of Jesus}}
[[File:Crèche - bergers.jpg|thumb|The adoration of the shepherds, a [[nativity scene]] in France]]
[[File:Crèche - bergers.jpg|thumb|The adoration of the shepherds, a [[nativity scene]] in France]]
According to the [[gospel of Luke]], a decree of the [[Roman Emperor]] [[Augustus]] required that Joseph return to his hometown of [[Bethlehem]] to register for a [[Census of Quirinius|Roman census]].{{efn|The historicity of this census' relationship to the birth of Jesus continues to be one of scholarly disagreement; see, for example, p. 71 in Edwards, James R. (2015).<ref>''The Gospel of Luke''. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans. {{ISBN|978-0802837356}}.</ref>}} While he was there with Mary, she gave birth to Jesus; but because there was no place for them in the inn, she used a [[manger]] as a cradle.<ref name=Brown1>Brown, Raymond Edward. ''Mary in the New Testament''. 1978 {{ISBN|978-0-8091-2168-7}}</ref>{{rp|p.14}}<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|2}}</ref> From the age at which Jewish maidens became marriageable, it is possible that Mary gave birth to her son when she was about thirteen or fourteen years of age. No historical document tells us how old she actually was at the time of the Nativity.<ref name="auto2"/> Most Jewish girls married in their mid to late teen years according to NRSV,<ref name="Keener Walton 2019 p. 2147">{{cite book | last1=Keener | first1=Craig S. | last2=Walton | first2=John H. | title=NRSV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible: Bringing to Life the Ancient World of Scripture | publisher=Zondervan | year=2019 | isbn=978-0-310-45272-0 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N2FgDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2147 | access-date=21 January 2023 | page=2147}}</ref> or between 13 and 16 years old, according to CSB.<ref name="Holman 2018 p. 1226">{{cite book | last=Holman | first=C.S.B.B. | title=CSB Worldview Study Bible, Navy LeatherTouch | publisher=B&H Publishing Group | year=2018 | isbn=978-1-4336-0434-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kgZLDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1226 | access-date=21 January 2023 | page=1226}}</ref> After eight days, the boy was [[Circumcision of Jesus|circumcised]] according to Jewish law and named "[[Jesus (name)|Jesus]]" ({{lang|hbo|ישוע}}, {{transliteration|hbo|[[Yeshua (name)|Yeshu'a]]}}), which means "[[Yahweh]] is salvation".<ref>''The Gospel of Matthew'' by R. T. France 2007 {{ISBN|0-8028-2501-X}} p. 53</ref>
According to the [[gospel of Luke]], a decree of the [[Roman Emperor]] [[Augustus]] required that Joseph return to his hometown of [[Bethlehem]] to register for a [[Census of Quirinius|Roman census]].{{efn|The historicity of this census' relationship to the birth of Jesus continues to be one of scholarly disagreement; see, for example, p. 71 in Edwards, James R. (2015).<ref>''The Gospel of Luke''. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans. {{ISBN|978-0802837356}}.</ref>}} While he was there with Mary, she gave birth to Jesus; but because there was no place for them in the inn, she used a [[manger]] as a cradle.<ref>Brown, Raymond Edward. ''Mary in the New Testament''. 1978 {{ISBN|978-0-8091-2168-7}}</ref>{{rp|p.14}}<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|2}}</ref> It is not told how old Mary was at the time of the Nativity,<ref name="Levine-2018" /> but attempts have been made to infer it from the age of a typical Jewish mother of that time. Mary Joan Winn Leith represents the view that Jewish girls typically married soon after the onset of puberty,<ref>Leith, Mary Joan Winn: Mary, Mother of Jesus. In Coogan, Michael (ed.): ''Oxford Encyclopedias of the Bible: Digital Collection''. Oxford University Press, 2022. ISBN 9780197669402.</ref> while according to [[Amram Tropper]], Jewish females generally married later in Palestine and the Western Diaspora than in Babylonia.<ref name="Tropper-2006">Tropper, A: Children and Childhood in Light of the Demographics of the Jewish Family in Late Antiquity. ''Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period'', Vol. 37, 2006, 3, pp. 299–343.</ref> Some scholars hold the view that among them it typically happened between their mid and late teen years<ref>{{cite book |last1=Keener |first1=Craig S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N2FgDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2147 |title=NRSV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible: Bringing to Life the Ancient World of Scripture |last2=Walton |first2=John H. |publisher=Zondervan |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-310-45272-0 |page=2147 |access-date=21 January 2023}}</ref> or late teens and early twenties.<ref name="Levine-2018" /><ref name="Tropper-2006" /> After eight days, the boy was [[Circumcision of Jesus|circumcised]] according to Jewish law and named "[[Jesus (name)|Jesus]]" ({{lang|hbo|ישוע}}, {{transliteration|hbo|[[Yeshua (name)|Yeshu'a]]}}), which means "[[Yahweh]] is salvation".<ref>''The Gospel of Matthew'' by R. T. France 2007 {{ISBN|0-8028-2501-X}} p. 53</ref>


After Mary continued in the "[[Tumah and taharah|blood of her purifying]]" another 33 days, for a total of 40 days, she brought her [[Burnt offering (Judaism)|burnt offering]] and [[sin offering]] to the [[Second Temple|Temple]] in [[Jerusalem]] (Luke 2:22),<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:22}}</ref> so the priest could make atonement for her.<ref>{{bibleverse|Leviticus|12:1–8}}</ref> They also presented Jesus{{snd}} "As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord" (Luke 2:23; Exodus 13:2; 23:12–15; 22:29; 34:19–20; Numbers 3:13; 18:15).<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:23}}; {{bibleverse|Exodus|13:2; 13:12–15; 22:29; 34:19–20}}; {{bibleverse|Numbers|3:13; 18:15}}</ref> After the prophecies of [[Simeon (Gospel of Luke)|Simeon]] and the prophetess [[Anna (Bible)|Anna]] in Luke 2:25–38,<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:25–38}}</ref> the family "returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth".<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:39}}</ref>
After Mary continued in the "[[Tumah and taharah|blood of her purifying]]" another 33 days, for a total of 40 days, she brought her [[Burnt offering (Judaism)|burnt offering]] and [[sin offering]] to the [[Second Temple|Temple]] in [[Jerusalem]] (Luke 2:22),<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:22}}</ref> so the priest could make atonement for her.<ref>{{bibleverse|Leviticus|12:1–8}}</ref> They also presented Jesus{{snd}}"As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord" (Luke 2:23; Exodus 13:2; 23:12–15; 22:29; 34:19–20; Numbers 3:13; 18:15).<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:23}}; {{bibleverse|Exodus|13:2; 13:12–15; 22:29; 34:19–20}}; {{bibleverse|Numbers|3:13; 18:15}}</ref> After the prophecies of [[Simeon (Gospel of Luke)|Simeon]] and the prophetess [[Anna (Bible)|Anna]] in Luke 2:25–38,<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:25–38}}</ref> the family "returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth".<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:39}}</ref>


According to the [[gospel of Matthew]], [[Biblical Magi|magi]] coming from Eastern regions arrived at Bethlehem where Jesus and his family were living, and worshiped him. Joseph was then warned in a dream that [[Herod the Great|King Herod]] wanted to murder the infant, and the [[Holy Family|family]] [[Flight into Egypt|fled by night to Egypt]] and stayed there for some time. After Herod's death in 4&nbsp;BC, they returned to Nazareth in Galilee, rather than Bethlehem, because Herod's son [[Herod Archelaus|Archelaus]] was the ruler of Judaea.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2}}</ref>
According to the [[gospel of Matthew]], [[Biblical Magi|magi]] coming from Eastern regions arrived at Bethlehem where Jesus and his family were living, and worshiped him. Joseph was then warned in a dream that [[Herod the Great|King Herod]] wanted to murder the infant, and the [[Holy Family|family]] [[Flight into Egypt|fled by night to Egypt]] and stayed there for some time. After Herod's death in 4&nbsp;BC, they returned to Nazareth in Galilee, rather than Bethlehem, because Herod's son [[Herod Archelaus|Archelaus]] was the ruler of Judaea.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2}}</ref>


Mary is involved in the only event in Jesus' adolescent life that is recorded in the New Testament. At the age of 12, Jesus, having become separated from his parents on their return journey from the [[Passover]] celebration in Jerusalem, was [[Finding in the Temple|found in the Temple]] among the religious teachers.<ref>Walvoord, John F., Roy B. Zuck. ''The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament edition''. 1983 {{ISBN|0-88207-812-7}}</ref>{{rp|p.210}}<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|2:41–52}}</ref>
Mary is involved in the only event in Jesus' adolescent life that is recorded in the New Testament. At the age of 12, Jesus, having become separated from his parents on their return journey from the [[Passover]] celebration in Jerusalem, was [[Finding in the Temple|found in the Temple]] among the religious teachers.<ref>Walvoord, John F.; Roy B. Zuck. ''The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament edition''. 1983. {{ISBN|0-88207-812-7}}.</ref>{{rp|p.210}}<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|2:41–52}}</ref>


====Ministry of Jesus====
====Ministry of Jesus====
[[File:Wüger Kreuzigung.jpg|thumb|right|upright=0.8|''[[Stabat Mater (art)|Stabat Mater]]'' by [[Gabriel Wuger]], 1868]]
[[File:Wüger Kreuzigung.jpg|thumb|right|upright=0.8|''[[Stabat Mater (art)|Stabat Mater]]'' by [[Gabriel Wuger]], 1868]]
Mary was present when, at her suggestion, Jesus worked his first miracle during a [[wedding at Cana]] by turning water into wine.<ref>{{Bibleverse|John|2:1–11}}</ref> Subsequently, there are events when Mary is present along with [[James the Just|James]], [[Joses, brother of James the younger|Joseph]], [[Simeon of Jerusalem|Simon]], and [[Jude, brother of Jesus|Judas]], called Jesus' brothers, and unnamed sisters.<ref>{{bibleverse|Mt|1:24–25|9}}, {{bibleverse|Mt|12:46|9|12:46}}, {{bibleverse|Mt|13:54–56|9|13:54–56}}, {{bibleverse|Mt|27:56|9|27:56}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|3:31|9}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|6:3|9|6:3}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|15:40|9|15:40}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|16:1|9|16:1}}, {{bibleverse|Jn|2:12|9}}, {{bibleverse|John|7:3–5|9|7:3–5}}, {{bibleverse|Gal|1:19|9}}, {{bibleverse|Ac|1:14|9}}</ref> Following [[Jerome]], the [[Church Fathers]] interpreted the words translated as "brother" and "sister" as referring to close relatives.<ref>''Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible'' by D. N. Freedman, David Noel, Allen Myers and Astrid B. Beck (2000) {{ISBN|9053565035}} p. 202</ref><ref>''The Bible: The Basics'' by John Barton (2010) [[Routledge]] {{ISBN|0415411351}} p. 7</ref>
Mary was present when, at her suggestion, Jesus worked his first miracle during a [[wedding at Cana]] by turning water into wine.<ref>{{Bibleverse|John|2:1–11}}</ref> Subsequently, there are events when Mary is mentioned along with the [[Brothers of Jesus|Jesus' brothers]].<ref>{{bibleverse|Mt|1:24–25|9}}, {{bibleverse|Mt|12:46|9|12:46}}, {{bibleverse|Mt|13:54–56|9|13:54–56}}, {{bibleverse|Mt|27:56|9|27:56}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|3:31|9}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|6:3|9|6:3}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|15:40|9|15:40}}, {{bibleverse|Mk|16:1|9|16:1}}, {{bibleverse|Jn|2:12|9}}, {{bibleverse|John|7:3–5|9|7:3–5}}, {{bibleverse|Gal|1:19|9}}, {{bibleverse|Acts|1:14|9}}</ref> According to [[Epiphanius of Salamis|Epiphanius]], [[Origen]] and [[Eusebius of Cesarea|Eusebius]], these "brothers" would be sons of Joseph from a previous marriage. This view is still the official position of the Eastern Orthodox churches. Following [[Jerome]], those would be actually Jesus' cousins, children of Mary's sister. This remains the official Roman Catholic position. For [[Helvidius]], those would be full siblings of Jesus, born to Mary and Joseph after the firstborn Jesus. This has been the most common Protestant position.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Butz |first=Jeffrey J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=610oDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT26 |title=The Brother of Jesus and the Lost Teachings of Christianity |publisher=Simon and Schuster |year=2005 |isbn=9781594778797 |pages=27 |language=en}}</ref><ref>''Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible'' by D. N. Freedman, David Noel, Allen Myers and Astrid B. Beck (2000) {{ISBN|9053565035}} p. 202</ref><ref>''The Bible: The Basics'' by John Barton (2010) [[Routledge]] {{ISBN|0415411351}} p. 7</ref>


The [[hagiography]] of Mary and the [[Holy Family]] can be contrasted with other material in the Gospels. These references include an incident which can be interpreted as Jesus rejecting his family in the New Testament: "And his mother and his brothers arrived, and standing outside, they sent in a message asking for him […] And looking at those who sat in a circle around him, Jesus said, 'These are my mother and my brothers. Whoever does the will of God is my brother, and sister, and mother'."<ref>[[Beverly Roberts Gaventa|Gaventa, Beverly Roberts]]. ''Mary: glimpses of the mother of Jesus.'' 1995 {{ISBN|1-57003-072-3}}, p. 70</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|3:31–35}}</ref>
The [[hagiography]] of Mary and the [[Holy Family]] can be contrasted with other material in the Gospels. These references include an incident which can be interpreted as Jesus rejecting his family in the New Testament: "And his mother and his brothers arrived, and standing outside, they sent in a message asking for him ... And looking at those who sat in a circle around him, Jesus said, 'These are my mother and my brothers. Whoever does the will of God is my brother, and sister, and mother'."<ref>[[Beverly Roberts Gaventa|Gaventa, Beverly Roberts]]. ''Mary: glimpses of the mother of Jesus.'' 1995 {{ISBN|1-57003-072-3}}, p. 70</ref><ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|3:31–35}}</ref>


Mary is also depicted as being present in a [[women at the crucifixion|group of women]] at the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucifixion]] standing near the [[disciple whom Jesus loved]] along with [[Mary of Clopas]] and [[Mary Magdalene]],<ref name="auto1"/> to which list Matthew 27:56<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|27:56}}</ref> adds "the mother of the sons of Zebedee", presumably the [[Salome (disciple)|Salome]] mentioned in Mark 15:40.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|15:40}}</ref>
Mary is also depicted as being present in a [[women at the crucifixion|group of women]] at the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucifixion]] standing near the [[disciple whom Jesus loved]] along with [[Mary of Clopas]] and [[Mary Magdalene]],<ref name="John 19"/> to which list Matthew 27:56<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|27:56}}</ref> adds "the mother of the sons of Zebedee", presumably the [[Salome (disciple)|Salome]] mentioned in Mark 15:40.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Mark|15:40}}</ref>


====After the Ascension of Jesus====
====After the Ascension of Jesus====
In Acts 1:12–26,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|1:12–26}}</ref> especially verse 14, Mary is the only one other than the [[Twelve apostles|eleven apostles]] to be mentioned by name who abode in the [[Cenacle|upper room]], when they returned from [[Mount of Olives|Mount Olivet]]. Her presence with the apostles during the [[Pentecost]] is not explicit, although it has been held as a fact by Christian tradition.
In Acts 1:12–26,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|1:12–26}}</ref> especially verse 14, Mary is the only one other than the [[Twelve apostles|eleven apostles]] to be mentioned by name who abode in the [[Cenacle|upper room]], when they returned from [[Mount of Olives|Mount Olivet]]. Her presence with the apostles during the [[Pentecost]] is not explicit, although it has been held as a fact by Christian tradition.<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 May 2021 |title=Pentecost and the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church |url=https://www.ncregister.com/blog/pentecost-and-the-blessed-virgin-mary |access-date=29 September 2024 |website=NCR |language=en |archive-date=30 October 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251030092503/https://www.ncregister.com/blog/pentecost-and-the-blessed-virgin-mary |url-status=live }}</ref>


From this time, she disappears from the biblical accounts, although it is held by Catholics that she is again portrayed as the [[Woman of the Apocalypse|heavenly woman]] in the [[Book of Revelation]].<ref>{{Bibleverse|Revelation|12:1|DRA; KJV}}</ref>
From this time, she disappears from the biblical accounts, although it is held by Catholics that she is again portrayed as the [[Woman of the Apocalypse|heavenly woman]] in the [[Book of Revelation]].<ref>{{Bibleverse|Revelation|12:1|DRA; KJV}}</ref>


Her death is not recorded in the scriptures, but Orthodox tradition, tolerated also by Catholics, has her first dying a natural death, known as the [[Dormition of the Mother of God|Dormition of Mary]],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Maas |first1=Anthony |title=The Blessed Virgin Mary |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm |website=The Catholic Encyclopedia |publisher=Robert Appleton Company |access-date=11 February 2022 |archive-date=10 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010170332/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> and then, soon after, her body itself also being [[Assumption of Mary|assumed]] (taken bodily) into [[Heaven#In Roman Catholicism|Heaven]]. Belief in the corporeal assumption of Mary is a [[Dogma in the Catholic Church|dogma]] of the [[Catholic Church]], in the [[Latin Church|Latin]] and [[Eastern Catholic Churches]] alike, and is believed as well by the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]],<ref>Stephen J. Shoemaker, [https://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199210749 ''Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070311005046/https://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199210749 |date=11 March 2007 }} (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 2006); ''De Obitu S. Dominae'' as noted in; Holweck, F. (1907). The Feast of the Assumption. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.</ref><ref name= Munificentissimus >{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |title=''Munificentissimus Deus'' on the Assumption |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=4 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904181017/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref> the [[Oriental Orthodox Churches|Oriental Orthodox Church]], and parts of the [[Anglican Communion]] and [[Continuing Anglican movement]].<ref>[https://www.copticchurch.net/topics/thecopticchurch/church2-1.html#7minor Coptic Church website] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140813074503/https://www.copticchurch.net/topics/thecopticchurch/church2-1.html#7minor |date=13 August 2014 }}, Accessed 2010/10/6.</ref>
Her death is not recorded in the scriptures, but Orthodox tradition, tolerated also by Catholics, has her first dying a natural death, known as the [[Dormition of the Mother of God|Dormition of Mary]],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Maas |first1=Anthony |title=The Blessed Virgin Mary |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm |website=The Catholic Encyclopedia |publisher=Robert Appleton Company |access-date=11 February 2022 |archive-date=10 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010170332/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> and then, soon after, her body itself also being [[Assumption of Mary|assumed]] (taken bodily) into [[Heaven#In Roman Catholicism|Heaven]]. Belief in the corporeal assumption of Mary is a [[Dogma in the Catholic Church|dogma]] of the [[Catholic Church]], in the [[Latin Church|Latin]] and [[Eastern Catholic Churches]] alike, and is believed as well by the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]],<ref>Stephen J. Shoemaker, [https://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199210749 ''Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption'']. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070311005046/https://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199210749|date=11 March 2007}}. (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002, 2006); ''De Obitu S. Dominae'' as noted in; Holweck, F. (1907). The Feast of the Assumption. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |title=''Munificentissimus Deus'' on the Assumption |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=4 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130904181017/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref> the [[Oriental Orthodox Churches|Oriental Orthodox Church]], and parts of the [[Anglican Communion]] and [[Continuing Anglican movement]].<ref>[https://www.copticchurch.net/topics/thecopticchurch/church2-1.html#7minor Coptic Church website] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140813074503/https://www.copticchurch.net/topics/thecopticchurch/church2-1.html#7minor |date=13 August 2014 }}, Accessed 2010/10/6.</ref>


===Later writings===
===Apocryphal accounts and later writings===
According to the [[apocryphal]] [[Gospel of James]], Mary was the daughter of [[Joachim]] and [[Saint Anne|Anne]]. Before Mary's conception, Anne had been barren and was far advanced in years. Mary was given to service as a consecrated virgin in the Temple in Jerusalem when she was three years old.<ref name="ReferenceA">Ronald Brownrigg, Canon Brownrigg ''Who's Who in the New Testament'' 2001 {{ISBN|0-415-26036-1}} p. T-62</ref> This was in spite of the patent impossibility of its premise that a girl could be kept in the Temple of Jerusalem along with some companions.<ref name="Roy2005">{{cite book|first=Christian|last=Roy|title=Traditional Festivals: A Multicultural Encyclopedia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IKqOUfqt4cIC&pg=PA373|year=2005|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-089-5|page=373|access-date=1 October 2020|archive-date=15 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815164522/https://books.google.com/books?id=IKqOUfqt4cIC&pg=PA373|url-status=live}}</ref>
{{Christianity|state=collapsed}}
Some [[apocryphal]] texts add further narrative elements to the story of Mary, although scholars generally consider such texts to be historically mainly unreliable.<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: ''Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', pp. 21–22, 52–53. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-952-5652-87-1}}</ref> According to the [[Gospel of James]], Mary was the daughter of [[Joachim]] and [[Saint Anne|Anne]]. Before Mary's conception, Anne had been barren and was far advanced in years. Mary was given to service as a consecrated virgin in the Temple in Jerusalem when she was three years old.<ref>Ronald Brownrigg, Canon Brownrigg. ''Who's Who in the New Testament,'' 2001. {{ISBN|0-415-26036-1}}, p. T-62.</ref> This event is commemorated by some Christian churches as a [[liturgical feast]], the [[Presentation of Mary]], even though its premise conflicts with common understandings of Jewish culture and temple customs.<ref>{{cite book|first=Christian|last=Roy|title=Traditional Festivals: A Multicultural Encyclopedia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IKqOUfqt4cIC&pg=PA373|year=2005|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-089-5|page=373|access-date=1 October 2020|archive-date=15 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210815164522/https://books.google.com/books?id=IKqOUfqt4cIC&pg=PA373|url-status=live}}</ref> The Gospel of James also states that Mary was 12–14 years old at the time of her betrothal to Joseph<ref>Gospel of James 8:2</ref> and that she was 16–17 during her pregnancy, according to most manuscripts.<ref>Gospel of James 12:3</ref><ref>Vuong, Lily C.: ''Gender and Purity in the Protevangelium of James'', p. 171. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.</ref><ref name="NewAdvent">{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: St. Joseph |publisher=Newadvent.org |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=27 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170627235620/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>Seppälä, Serafim: ''Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', pp. 40–41. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-9525652871}}.</ref> According to ancient Jewish custom, Mary could have been betrothed at 12,<ref>Allison, Dale C., [https://books.google.com/books?id=m_OShrBh0I0C&q=betrothal&pg=PA12 ''Matthew: A Shorter Commentary'', p. 12] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705121433/https://books.google.com/books?id=m_OShrBh0I0C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA12#v=onepage&q=betrothal&f=false |date=5 July 2021 }} Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004 {{ISBN|0-567-08249-0}}</ref> but some scholars hold the view that in [[Judea]] betrothal typically happened later.<ref name="Levine-2018">Levine, Amy-Jill & Witherington III, Ben: ''The Gospel of Luke'', p. 34. Cambridge University Press, 2018. {{ISBN|9780521859509}}.</ref> The text underlines that the relationship between Mary and Joseph was a non-sexual social arrangement, and that Mary was dedicated to God. It emphasizes holiness of Mary and the virginal nature of her pregnancy.<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: ''Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', pp. 36–42. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-952-5652-87-1}}</ref>


While unproven, some apocryphal accounts state that at the time of her betrothal to Joseph, Mary was 12–14 years old.<ref name="NewAdvent">{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: St. Joseph |publisher=Newadvent.org |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=27 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170627235620/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Her age during her pregnancy has varied up to 17 in apochyphal sources.<ref>Vuong, Lily C.: ''Gender and Purity in the Protevangelium of James'', p. 171. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.</ref><ref>Seppälä, Serafim: ''Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', pp. 40–41. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-9525652871}}.</ref> In a large part, apocryphal texts are historically unreliable.<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: ''Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', pp. 21–22. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010.</ref> According to ancient Jewish custom, Mary technically could have been betrothed at about 12,<ref name="Allison">Allison, Dale C., [https://books.google.com/books?id=m_OShrBh0I0C&q=betrothal&pg=PA12 ''Matthew: A Shorter Commentary'', p. 12] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705121433/https://books.google.com/books?id=m_OShrBh0I0C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA12#v=onepage&q=betrothal&f=false |date=5 July 2021 }} Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004 {{ISBN|0-567-08249-0}}</ref> but most Jewish women in Palestine of her time married during their late teens or early twenties.<ref>Levine, Amy-Jill & Witherington III, Ben: ''The Gospel of Luke'', p. 34. Cambridge University Press, 2018. {{ISBN|9780521859509}}.</ref>
Although the canonical gospels contain no account of Mary's life after the resurrection, texts written centuries later provide some embellishment. The origin and authenticity of these details are unknown. The earliest extant biographical writing on Mary is ''[[Life of the Virgin (Maximus)|Life of the Virgin]]'', attributed to the 7th-century saint [[Maximus the Confessor]], which portrays her as a key element of the [[Early Christianity|early Christian Church]] after the death of Jesus.<ref>''The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies'' by Susan Ashbrook Harvey, David G. Hunter 2008 {{ISBN|978-0199271566}} p. 527</ref><ref>''The reception and interpretation of the Bible in late antiquity'' by Lorenzo DiTommaso, Lucian Turcescu 2008 {{ISBN|9004167153}} p. 507</ref><ref>[https://commonwealmagazine.org/maximus%E2%80%99s-mary Maximus's Mary] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120530230802/https://commonwealmagazine.org/maximus%E2%80%99s-mary |date=30 May 2012 }}, by Sally Cuneen, ''Commonweal Magazine'', 4 December 2009</ref> [[Hyppolitus of Thebes]], writing in the 7th or 8th century, says that Mary lived for 11 years after the death of her son, dying in 41 AD.<ref>{{cite book| title = Paul's early period: chronology, mission strategy, theology| author = [[Rainer Riesner]]| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7mAqa7PYr4kC&q=Hippolytus+of+Thebes&pg=PA120| access-date = 20 August 2011| isbn = 978-0802841667| year = 1998| publisher = Wm. B. Eerdmans| archive-date = 30 December 2020| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201230090849/https://books.google.com/books?id=7mAqa7PYr4kC&q=Hippolytus+of+Thebes&pg=PA120| url-status = live}}</ref>


[[Hyppolitus of Thebes]] says that Mary lived for 11 years after the death of her son Jesus, dying in 41 AD.<ref>{{cite book| title = Paul's early period: chronology, mission strategy, theology| author = [[Rainer Riesner]]| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7mAqa7PYr4kC&q=Hippolytus+of+Thebes&pg=PA120| access-date = 20 August 2011| isbn = 978-0802841667| year = 1998| publisher = Wm. B. Eerdmans| archive-date = 30 December 2020| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201230090849/https://books.google.com/books?id=7mAqa7PYr4kC&q=Hippolytus+of+Thebes&pg=PA120| url-status = live}}</ref>
==Religious perspectives==


The earliest extant biographical writing on Mary is ''[[Life of the Virgin (Maximus)|Life of the Virgin]]'', attributed to the 7th-century saint [[Maximus the Confessor]], which portrays her as a key element of the [[Early Christianity|early Christian Church]] after the death of Jesus.<ref name=oxf >''The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies'' by Susan Ashbrook Harvey, David G. Hunter 2008 {{ISBN|978-0199271566}} p. 527</ref><ref>''The reception and interpretation of the Bible in late antiquity'' by Lorenzo DiTommaso, Lucian Turcescu 2008 {{ISBN|9004167153}} p. 507</ref><ref name=Sally2009 >[https://commonwealmagazine.org/maximus%E2%80%99s-mary Maximus's Mary] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120530230802/https://commonwealmagazine.org/maximus%E2%80%99s-mary |date=30 May 2012 }}, by Sally Cuneen, ''Commonweal Magazine'', 4 December 2009</ref>
==Religious perspectives==
{{Infobox saint
{{Infobox saint
| honorific_prefix = [[Canonization|Saint]]
| honorific_prefix = [[Canonization|Saint]]
Line 127: Line 131:
| death_place    =
| death_place    =
| feast_day      = See [[Marian feast days]]
| feast_day      = See [[Marian feast days]]
| honored_in      = Christianity, Islam, [[Druze faith]]<ref>{{cite book|title=The Culture of Sectarianism: Community, History, and Violence in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Lebanon|first=Ussama|last=Makdisi|year=2000|isbn=978-0520218468|page =35|publisher=University of California Press|quote=}}</ref>  
| honored_in      = Christianity, Islam, [[Druze faith]]<ref name="Makdisi-2000"/>  
| canonized_date  = Pre-[[Congregation for the Causes of Saints|Congregation]]
| canonized_date  = Pre-[[Congregation for the Causes of Saints|Congregation]]
| canonized_place =
| canonized_place =
Line 141: Line 145:
===Christian===
===Christian===
{{See also|Mariology|Theotokos|Hymns to Mary}}
{{See also|Mariology|Theotokos|Hymns to Mary}}
Christian Marian perspectives include a great deal of diversity. While some Christians such as Catholics and Eastern Orthodox have well established Marian traditions, Protestants at large pay scant attention to [[Mariology|Mariological]] themes. Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglican, and Lutherans [[veneration|venerate]] the Virgin Mary. This veneration especially takes the form of [[prayer]] for intercession with her Son, Jesus Christ. Additionally, it includes composing poems and songs in Mary's honor, painting [[icon]]s or carving statues of her, and [[Titles of Mary|conferring titles on Mary]] that reflect her position among the saints.<ref name="Hillerbrand" /><ref name="Fairbairn" /><ref name="FrankFlinn" /><ref name="Schroedel81" />
Christian Marian perspectives include a great deal of diversity. While some Christians such as Catholics and Eastern Orthodox have well established Marian traditions, Protestants at large pay scant attention to [[Mariology|Mariological]] themes. Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutherans and Anglicans [[veneration|venerate]] the Virgin Mary. This veneration especially takes the form of [[prayer]] for intercession with her Son, Jesus Christ. Additionally, it includes composing poems and songs in Mary's honor, painting [[icon]]s or carving statues of her, and [[Titles of Mary|conferring titles on Mary]] that reflect her position among the saints.<ref name="Hillerbrand-2003" /><ref name="Fairbairn-2002" /><ref name="Flinn-2007" /><ref name="Schroedel-2006" />


====Catholic====
====Catholic====
{{Main|Roman Catholic Mariology|Veneration of Mary in Roman Catholicism}}
{{Main|Veneration of Mary in the Catholic Church}}
 
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[File:Velankanni-Tamilnadu-Festival-Car-Procession-Photo.jpg|thumb|right|[[Velankanni]] Basilica in [[Tamil Nadu]]([[India]]) where a great possession to mother mary is taken place during the annual fest]] -->
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[File:Velankanni-Tamilnadu-Festival-Car-Procession-Photo.jpg|thumb|right|[[Velankanni]] Basilica in [[Tamil Nadu]]([[India]]) where a great possession to mother mary is taken place during the annual fest]] -->
In the Catholic Church, Mary is accorded the title "Blessed" ({{lang|la|beata}}, {{lang|grc|μακάρια|translit=makaria}}) in recognition of her assumption to Heaven and her capacity to intercede on behalf of those who pray to her. There is a difference between the usage of the term "blessed" as pertaining to Mary and its usage as pertaining to a [[beatified]] person. "Blessed" as a Marian title refers to her exalted state as being the greatest among the saints; for a person who has been declared beatified, on the other hand, "blessed" simply indicates that they may be venerated despite not being [[canonized]]. Catholic teachings make clear that Mary is not considered divine and prayers to her are not answered by her, but rather by God through her intercession.<ref>Miegge, Giovanni, ''[[The Virgin Mary (book)|The Virgin Mary: Roman Catholic Marian Doctrine]]'', pp. 15–22, Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1963.</ref> The [[Roman Catholic Mariology|four Catholic dogmas]] regarding Mary are: her status as {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, or Mother of God; her perpetual virginity; the Immaculate Conception; and her bodily Assumption into [[Heaven (Christianity)|Heaven]].<ref name="Fahlbusch" /><ref>''Merriam-Webster's encyclopedia of world religions'' by Wendy Doniger, 1999 {{ISBN|0-87779-044-2}} p. 696</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_11101954_ad-caeli-reginam_en.html|title= Encyclical ''Ad Caeli Reginam''|publisher= Vatican|access-date= 15 March 2020|archive-date= 7 October 2010|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20101007103544/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_11101954_ad-caeli-reginam_en.html|url-status= live}}</ref>
In the Catholic Church, Mary is accorded the title "Blessed" ({{lang|la|beata}}, {{lang|grc|μακάρια}}, {{transliteration|grc|makaria}}) in recognition of her assumption to Heaven and her capacity to intercede on behalf of those who pray to her. There is a difference between the usage of the term "blessed" as pertaining to Mary and its usage as pertaining to a [[beatified]] person. "Blessed" as a Marian title refers to her exalted state as being the greatest among the saints; for a person who has been declared beatified, on the other hand, "blessed" simply indicates that they may be venerated despite not being [[canonized]]. Catholic teachings make clear that Mary is not considered divine and prayers to her are not answered by her, but rather by God through her intercession.<ref>Miegge, Giovanni, ''[[The Virgin Mary (book)|The Virgin Mary: Roman Catholic Marian Doctrine]]'', pp. 15–22, Westminster Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1963.</ref> The [[Roman Catholic Mariology|four Catholic dogmas]] regarding Mary are: her status as {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, or Mother of God; her perpetual virginity; the Immaculate Conception; and her bodily Assumption into Heaven.<ref name="Fahlbusch-2003" /><ref>''Merriam-Webster's encyclopedia of world religions'' by Wendy Doniger, 1999 {{ISBN|0-87779-044-2}} p. 696</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_11101954_ad-caeli-reginam_en.html|title= Encyclical ''Ad Caeli Reginam''|publisher= Vatican|access-date= 15 March 2020|archive-date= 7 October 2010|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20101007103544/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_11101954_ad-caeli-reginam_en.html|url-status= live}}</ref>


The [[Veneration of Mary in Roman Catholicism|Blessed Virgin Mary]], the mother of Jesus has a more central role in Roman Catholic teachings and beliefs than in any other major Christian group. Not only do Roman Catholics have more theological doctrines and teachings that relate to Mary, but they have more feasts, prayers, devotional and venerative practices than any other group.<ref name=FrankFlinn /> The ''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'' states: "The Church's devotion to the Blessed Virgin is intrinsic to Christian worship."<ref name="ccc971">{{Cite CCC|2.1|971}}</ref>
The [[Veneration of Mary in Roman Catholicism|Blessed Virgin Mary]], the mother of Jesus has a more central role in Roman Catholic teachings and beliefs than in any other major Christian group. Not only do Roman Catholics have more theological doctrines and teachings that relate to Mary, but they have more feasts, prayers, devotional and venerative practices than any other group.<ref name="Flinn-2007" /> The ''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'' states: "The Church's devotion to the Blessed Virgin is intrinsic to Christian worship."<ref name="ccc971">{{Cite CCC|2.1|971}}</ref>


For centuries, Catholics have performed acts of [[consecration and entrustment to Mary]] at personal, societal and regional levels. These acts may be directed to the Virgin herself, to the [[Immaculate Heart of Mary]] and to the [[Immaculate Conception]]. In Catholic teachings, consecration to Mary does not diminish or substitute the love of God, but enhances it, for all consecration is ultimately made to God.<ref>''The Catholicism Answer Book'' by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 {{ISBN|1-4022-0806-5}} p. 325</ref><ref name="VaticanEntrust">{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20020513_vers-direttorio_en.html#Chapter%20Five |title=Vatican website: Marian consecration and entrustment, item 204 |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=23 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120623013300/https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20020513_vers-direttorio_en.html#Chapter%20Five |url-status=live }}</ref>
For centuries, Catholics have performed acts of [[consecration and entrustment to Mary]] at personal, societal and regional levels. These acts may be directed to the Virgin herself, to the [[Immaculate Heart of Mary]] and to the [[Immaculate Conception]]. In Catholic teachings, consecration to Mary does not diminish or substitute the love of God, but enhances it, for all consecration is ultimately made to God.<ref>''The Catholicism Answer Book'' by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 {{ISBN|1-4022-0806-5}} p. 325</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20020513_vers-direttorio_en.html#Chapter%20Five |title=Vatican website: Marian consecration and entrustment, item 204 |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=23 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120623013300/https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20020513_vers-direttorio_en.html#Chapter%20Five |url-status=live }}</ref>


Following the growth of Marian devotions in the 16th century, Catholic saints wrote books such as [[The Glories of Mary|''Glories of Mary'']] and ''[[True Devotion to Mary]]'' that emphasized Marian veneration and taught that "the path to Jesus is through Mary".<ref>Schroede, Jenny, ''The Everything Mary Book'' 2006 {{ISBN|1-59337-713-4}} p. 219</ref> Marian devotions are at times linked to [[Christology|Christocentric]] devotions (such as the [[Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary]]).<ref>O'Carroll, Michael, ''The Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary'' 2007, {{ISBN|1-882972-98-8}} pp. 10–15</ref>
Following the growth of Marian devotions in the 16th century, Catholic saints wrote books such as [[The Glories of Mary|''Glories of Mary'']] and ''[[True Devotion to Mary]]'' that emphasized Marian veneration and taught that "the path to Jesus is through Mary".<ref>Schroede, Jenny, ''The Everything Mary Book'' 2006 {{ISBN|1-59337-713-4}} p. 219</ref> Marian devotions are at times linked to [[Christology|Christocentric]] devotions (such as the [[Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary]]).<ref>O'Carroll, Michael, ''The Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary'' 2007, {{ISBN|1-882972-98-8}} pp. 10–15</ref>
Line 156: Line 161:
Major Marian devotions include: [[Seven Sorrows of Mary]], [[Rosary and scapular]], [[Miraculous Medal]] and [[Acts of Reparation to the Virgin Mary|Reparations to Mary]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary |website=NewAdvent.org |date=1 October 1912 |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15459a.htm |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=19 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419113405/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15459a.htm |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.zenit.org/article-23246?l=english |title=Cardinal Urges Devotion to Rosary and Scapular |publisher=Zenit.org |date=17 July 2008 |access-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121114053557/https://www.zenit.org/article-23246?l=english |archive-date=14 November 2012 }}</ref> The months of May and October are traditionally "Marian months" for Roman Catholics; the daily [[rosary]] is encouraged in October and in [[May devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary|May Marian devotions]] take place in many regions.<ref>''Handbook of Prayers'' by James Socías 2006 {{ISBN|0-87973-579-1}} p. 483</ref><ref>''The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 4'' by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2005 {{ISBN|0-8028-2416-1}} p. 575</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_22091891_octobri-mense_en.html|website=Octobri Mense|publisher=Vatican|access-date=4 October 2010|title=Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII on the Rosary|author=Pope Leo XIII|archive-date=3 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203021237/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_22091891_octobri-mense_en.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Popes have issued a number of [[Marian papal encyclicals and Apostolic Letters|Marian encyclicals and Apostolic Letters]] to encourage devotions to and the veneration of the Virgin Mary.
Major Marian devotions include: [[Seven Sorrows of Mary]], [[Rosary and scapular]], [[Miraculous Medal]] and [[Acts of Reparation to the Virgin Mary|Reparations to Mary]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary |website=NewAdvent.org |date=1 October 1912 |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15459a.htm |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=19 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419113405/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15459a.htm |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.zenit.org/article-23246?l=english |title=Cardinal Urges Devotion to Rosary and Scapular |publisher=Zenit.org |date=17 July 2008 |access-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121114053557/https://www.zenit.org/article-23246?l=english |archive-date=14 November 2012 }}</ref> The months of May and October are traditionally "Marian months" for Roman Catholics; the daily [[rosary]] is encouraged in October and in [[May devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary|May Marian devotions]] take place in many regions.<ref>''Handbook of Prayers'' by James Socías 2006 {{ISBN|0-87973-579-1}} p. 483</ref><ref>''The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 4'' by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2005 {{ISBN|0-8028-2416-1}} p. 575</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_22091891_octobri-mense_en.html|website=Octobri Mense|publisher=Vatican|access-date=4 October 2010|title=Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII on the Rosary|author=Pope Leo XIII|archive-date=3 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203021237/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_22091891_octobri-mense_en.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Popes have issued a number of [[Marian papal encyclicals and Apostolic Letters|Marian encyclicals and Apostolic Letters]] to encourage devotions to and the veneration of the Virgin Mary.


Catholics place high emphasis on Mary's roles as protector and intercessor and the [[Catechism of the Catholic Church|''Catechism'']] refers to Mary as "honored with the title 'Mother of God', to whose protection the faithful fly in all their dangers and needs".<ref name="ccc971"/><ref>''A Beginner's Book of Prayer: An Introduction to Traditional Catholic Prayers'' by William G. Storey 2009 {{ISBN|0-8294-2792-9}} p. 99</ref><ref name="Ball365">Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices'' {{ISBN|0-87973-910-X}} p. 365</ref><ref>''Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Almanac'' by Matthew Bunson 2009 {{ISBN|1-59276-441-X}} p. 122</ref><ref>''The Catholic Handbook for Visiting the Sick and Homebound'' by Corinna Laughlin, Sara McGinnis Lee 2010 {{ISBN|978-1-56854-886-9}} p. 4</ref> Key Marian prayers include: {{lang|la|[[Hail Mary|Ave Maria]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Alma Redemptoris Mater]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Sub tuum praesidium]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Ave maris stella]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Regina caeli]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Ave Regina caelorum]]}} and the {{lang|la|[[Magnificat]]}}.<ref>Geoghegan. G.P. ''A Collection of My Favorite Prayers'', 2006 {{ISBN|1-4116-9457-0}} pp. 31, 45, 70, 86, 127</ref>
Catholics place high emphasis on Mary's roles as protector and intercessor and the [[Catechism of the Catholic Church|''Catechism'']] refers to Mary as "honored with the title 'Mother of God', to whose protection the faithful fly in all their dangers and needs".<ref name="ccc971"/><ref>''A Beginner's Book of Prayer: An Introduction to Traditional Catholic Prayers'' by William G. Storey 2009 {{ISBN|0-8294-2792-9}} p. 99</ref><ref>Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices'' {{ISBN|0-87973-910-X}} p. 365</ref><ref>''Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Almanac'' by Matthew Bunson 2009 {{ISBN|1-59276-441-X}} p. 122</ref><ref>''The Catholic Handbook for Visiting the Sick and Homebound'' by Corinna Laughlin, Sara McGinnis Lee 2010 {{ISBN|978-1-56854-886-9}} p. 4</ref> Key Marian prayers include: {{lang|la|[[Hail Mary|Ave Maria]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Alma Redemptoris Mater]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Sub tuum praesidium]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Ave maris stella]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Regina caeli]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Ave Regina caelorum]]}} and the {{lang|la|[[Magnificat]]}}.<ref>Geoghegan. G.P. ''A Collection of My Favorite Prayers'', 2006 {{ISBN|1-4116-9457-0}} pp. 31, 45, 70, 86, 127</ref>


Mary's participation in the processes of [[Salvation (Christianity)|salvation]] and redemption has also been emphasized in the Catholic tradition, but they are not doctrines.<ref>''Mary, mother of the redemption'' by Edward Schillebeeckx 1964 {{ASIN|B003KW30VG}} pp. 82–84</ref><ref>''Mary in the Redemption'' by Adrienne von Speyr 2003 {{ISBN|0-89870-955-5}} pp. 2–7</ref><ref>''Salvation Through Mary'' by Henry Aloysius Barry 2008 {{ISBN|1-4097-3172-3}} pp. 13–15</ref><ref>''The mystery of Mary'' by Paul Haffner 2004 {{ISBN|0-85244-650-0}} p. 198</ref> [[Pope John Paul II]]'s 1987 encyclical {{lang|la|[[Redemptoris Mater]]}} began with the sentence: "The Mother of the Redeemer has a precise place in the plan of salvation."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater_en.html |title=''Redemptoris Mater'' at the Vatican website |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=1 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150101165341/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
Mary's participation in the processes of [[Salvation (Christianity)|salvation]] and redemption has also been emphasized in the Catholic tradition, but they are not doctrines.<ref>''Mary, mother of the redemption'' by Edward Schillebeeckx 1964 {{ASIN|B003KW30VG}} pp. 82–84</ref><ref>''Mary in the Redemption'' by Adrienne von Speyr 2003 {{ISBN|0-89870-955-5}} pp. 2–7</ref><ref>''Salvation Through Mary'' by Henry Aloysius Barry 2008 {{ISBN|1-4097-3172-3}} pp. 13–15</ref><ref>''The mystery of Mary'' by Paul Haffner 2004 {{ISBN|0-85244-650-0}} p. 198</ref> [[Pope John Paul II]]'s 1987 encyclical {{lang|la|[[Redemptoris Mater]]}} began with the sentence: "The Mother of the Redeemer has a precise place in the plan of salvation."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater_en.html |title=''Redemptoris Mater'' at the Vatican website |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=1 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150101165341/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


In the 20th century, both popes John Paul II and [[Benedict XVI]] emphasized the Marian focus of the Catholic Church. Cardinal [[Joseph Ratzinger]] (later Pope Benedict XVI) suggested a redirection of the whole church towards the program of Pope John Paul II in order to ensure an authentic approach to [[Christology]] via a return to the "whole truth about Mary,"<ref name="BurkeMariology" /> writing:
In the 20th century, both popes John Paul II and [[Benedict XVI]] emphasized the Marian focus of the Catholic Church. Cardinal [[Joseph Ratzinger]] (later Pope Benedict XVI) suggested a redirection of the whole church towards the program of Pope John Paul II in order to ensure an authentic approach to [[Christology]] via a return to the "whole truth about Mary,"<ref name="Miravalle-Burke-2008" /> writing:
<blockquote>"It is necessary to go back to Mary if we want to return to that 'truth about Jesus Christ,' 'truth about the Church' and 'truth about man.{{'"}}<ref name="BurkeMariology">Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; (2008). Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons {{ISBN|978-1-57918-355-4}} p. xxi</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>"It is necessary to go back to Mary if we want to return to that 'truth about Jesus Christ,' 'truth about the Church' and 'truth about man.{{'"}}<ref name="Miravalle-Burke-2008">Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; (2008). Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons {{ISBN|978-1-57918-355-4}} p. xxi</ref></blockquote>


There is significant diversity in the Marian doctrines attributed to her primarily by the Catholic Church. The key Marian doctrines held primarily in Catholicism can be briefly outlined as follows:
There is significant diversity in the Marian doctrines attributed to her primarily by the Catholic Church. The key Marian doctrines held primarily in Catholicism can be briefly outlined as follows:
Line 171: Line 176:
* [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]]: Mary was taken [[entering heaven alive|bodily into heaven]] either at, or before, her death.
* [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]]: Mary was taken [[entering heaven alive|bodily into heaven]] either at, or before, her death.


The acceptance of these Marian doctrines by Roman Catholics and other Christians can be summarized as follows:<ref name="protestantencyclopedia">''Encyclopedia of Protestantism, Volume 3'' 2003 by Hans Joachim Hillerbrand {{ISBN|0-415-92472-3}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=cbBx9DTtwSIC&q=mariology+protestant&pg=PA1174 1174] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705114410/https://books.google.com/books?id=cbBx9DTtwSIC&pg=PA1174#v=onepage&q=mariology%20protestant&f=false |date=5 July 2021 }}</ref><ref>Jackson, Gregory Lee.''Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison''. 1993 {{ISBN|978-0-615-16635-3}} p. 254</ref><ref>Miravalle, Mark. ''Introduction to Mary''. 1993 Queenship Publishing {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}} p. 51</ref>
The acceptance of these Marian doctrines by Roman Catholics and other Christians can be summarized as follows:<ref name="Hillerbrand-2004">{{Cite book |last=Hillerbrand |first=Hans J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cbBx9DTtwSIC&q=mariology+protestant&pg=PA1174 |title=The Encyclopedia of Protestantism |date=15 January 2004 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-0-203-48431-9 |language=en}}</ref><ref>Jackson, Gregory Lee.''Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison''. 1993 {{ISBN|978-0-615-16635-3}} p. 254</ref><ref>Miravalle, Mark. ''Introduction to Mary''. 1993 Queenship Publishing {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}} p. 51</ref>


{|class="wikitable"
{|class="wikitable"
Line 179: Line 184:
!| Accepted by
!| Accepted by
|-
|-
| [[Virgin birth of Jesus]] || [[First Council of Nicaea]], 325 || Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrians, Anglicans, Baptists, mainline Protestants
| [[Virgin birth of Jesus]] || [[First Council of Nicaea]], 325 || Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrians, Lutherans, Anglicans, Baptists and other Protestants
|-
|-
| [[Mother of God]]|| [[First Council of Ephesus]], 431 || Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglicans, Lutherans, some Methodists
| [[Mother of God]]|| [[First Council of Ephesus]], 431 || Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists, some Evangelicals.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gatewood |first=Timothy |date=8 November 2023 |title=Should Evangelicals Call Mary the "Mother of God"? |url=https://credomag.com/2023/11/should-evangelicals-call-mary-the-mother-of-god/ |access-date=29 June 2024 |website=credomag.com |language=en-US |archive-date=29 June 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240629182805/https://credomag.com/2023/11/should-evangelicals-call-mary-the-mother-of-god/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
|-
| [[Perpetual Virginity]] || [[Second Council of Constantinople|Second Ecumenical Council of Constantinople]], 553{{pb}}[[Smalcald Articles]], 1537 || Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrians, some Anglicans, some Lutherans (Martin Luther)
| [[Perpetual Virginity]] || [[Second Council of Constantinople|Second Ecumenical Council of Constantinople]], 553 || Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrians, many Lutherans, some Anglicans<ref name="Smith-2010"/><ref name="Anderson-1992"/><ref>{{cite book |title=The American Lutheran, Volume 49 |date=1966 |publisher=American Lutheran Publicity Bureau |page=16 |language=English |quote=While the perpetual virginity of Mary is held as a pious opinion by many Lutheran confessors, it is not regarded as binding teaching of the Scriptures.}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Immaculate Conception]] ||{{lang|la|[[Ineffabilis Deus]]}} encyclical{{pb}}[[Pope Pius IX]], 1854 || Catholics, some Anglicans, some Lutherans (early Martin Luther)
|[[Immaculate Conception]] ||{{lang|la|[[Ineffabilis Deus]]}} encyclical{{pb}}[[Pope Pius IX]], 1854 || Catholics, some Oriental Orthodox,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://english.eritreantewahdo.org/bwl-advanced-faq/what-is-our-position-on-st-mary-and-immaculate-conception-and-what-is-it/|title=What is our position on St. Mary and Immaculate Conception and what is it?|date=19 January 2016|publisher=Diocese of U.S.A. and Canada, [[Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church]]|access-date=6 January 2025|archive-date=5 November 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231105153624/https://english.eritreantewahdo.org/bwl-advanced-faq/what-is-our-position-on-st-mary-and-immaculate-conception-and-what-is-it/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eotcmk.org/e/the-birth-of-the-blessed-virgin-mary-2/|title=THE BIRTH OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY – Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Sunday School Department – Mahibere Kidusan}}</ref> some Anglicans, some Lutherans (early Martin Luther)
|-
|-
| [[Assumption of Mary]] || {{lang|la|[[Munificentissimus Deus]]}} encyclical{{pb}}[[Pope Pius XII]], 1950 || Catholics, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox (only following her natural death), some Anglicans, some Lutherans
| [[Assumption of Mary]] || {{lang|la|[[Munificentissimus Deus]]}} encyclical{{pb}}[[Pope Pius XII]], 1950 || Catholics, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox (only following her natural death), some Lutherans, some Anglicans
|}
|}


The title "Mother of God" ({{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}) for Mary was confirmed by the [[First Council of Ephesus]], held at the [[Church of Mary]] in 431. The Council decreed that Mary is the Mother of God because her son Jesus is one person who is both God and man, divine and human.<ref name="ccel.org"/> This doctrine is widely accepted by Christians in general, and the term "Mother of God" had already been used within the oldest known prayer to Mary, the {{lang|la|[[Sub tuum praesidium]]}}, which dates to around 250 AD.<ref>Miravalle, Mark ''Introduction to Mary'', 1993, {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}}, pp. 44–46</ref><!-- Parts of this are redundant with text from "Names and titles". Should this be kept? -->
The title "Mother of God" ({{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}) for Mary was confirmed by the [[First Council of Ephesus]], held at the [[Church of Mary]] in 431. The Council decreed that Mary is the Mother of God because her son Jesus is one person who is both God and man, divine and human.<ref name="ccel.org"/> This doctrine is widely accepted by Christians in general, and the term "Mother of God" had already been used within the oldest known prayer to Mary, the {{lang|la|[[Sub tuum praesidium]]}}, which dates to around 250 AD.<ref>Miravalle, Mark ''Introduction to Mary'', 1993, {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}}, pp. 44–46</ref><ref name="Smith-2010"/><ref name="Anderson-1992"/><!-- Parts of this are redundant with text from "Names and titles". Should this be kept? -->


[[File:Saint Mary of Lukawiec-Saint Mary of Tartakow.jpg|thumb|Miraculous Icon of Our Lady of Tartaków in Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Łukawiec]]
[[File:Saint Mary of Lukawiec-Saint Mary of Tartakow.jpg|thumb|Miraculous Icon of Our Lady of Tartaków in Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Łukawiec]]


The [[Virgin birth of Jesus]] was an almost universally held belief among Christians from the 2nd until the 19th century.<ref name="britannica">"[https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9075467/Virgin-Birth#181858 Virgin Birth] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080303125658/https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9075467/Virgin-Birth#181858 |date=3 March 2008 }}" ''britannica.com''. Retrieved 22 October 2007.</ref> It is included in the two most widely used Christian [[creed]]s, which state that Jesus "was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary" (the [[Nicene Creed]], in what is now its familiar form)<ref>Translation by the ecumenical [[English Language Liturgical Consultation]], given on p. 17 of [https://web.archive.org/web/20131029201315/https://www.englishtexts.org/praying.pdf Praying Together], a literal translation of the [https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc3.iii.xii.xiii.html original] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210501042331/https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc3.iii.xii.xiii.html |date=1 May 2021 }}, "σαρκωθέντα ἐκ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου καὶ Μαρίας τῆς Παρθένου", accessed 11 September 2014</ref> and the [[Apostles' Creed]]. The [[Gospel of Matthew]] describes Mary as a virgin who fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14,<ref>{{Bibleverse|Isaiah|7:14}}</ref> The authors of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke consider Jesus' conception not the result of intercourse, and assert that Mary had "no relations with man" before Jesus' birth.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:18}}; {{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:25}}; {{Bibleverse|Luke|1:34}}</ref> This alludes to the belief that Mary conceived Jesus through the action of God the Holy Spirit, and not through [[human reproduction#Copulation|intercourse]] with Joseph or anyone else.<ref name="Miravalle56">Miravalle, Mark ''Introduction to Mary'', 1993, {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}}, pp. 56–64</ref>
The [[Virgin birth of Jesus]] was an almost universally held belief among Christians from the 2nd until the 19th century.<ref>"[https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9075467/Virgin-Birth#181858 Virgin Birth] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080303125658/https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9075467/Virgin-Birth#181858 |date=3 March 2008 }}" ''britannica.com''. Retrieved 22 October 2007.</ref> It is included in the two most widely used Christian [[creed]]s, which state that Jesus "was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary" (the [[Nicene Creed]], in what is now its familiar form)<ref>Translation by the ecumenical [[English Language Liturgical Consultation]], given on p. 17 of [https://web.archive.org/web/20131029201315/https://www.englishtexts.org/praying.pdf Praying Together], a literal translation of the [https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc3.iii.xii.xiii.html original] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210501042331/https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc3.iii.xii.xiii.html |date=1 May 2021 }}, "σαρκωθέντα ἐκ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου καὶ Μαρίας τῆς Παρθένου", accessed 11 September 2014</ref> and the [[Apostles' Creed]]. The [[Gospel of Matthew]] describes Mary as a virgin who fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14,<ref>{{Bibleverse|Isaiah|7:14}}</ref> The authors of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke consider Jesus' conception not the result of intercourse, and assert that Mary had "no relations with man" before Jesus' birth.<ref>{{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:18}}; {{Bibleverse|Matthew|1:25}}; {{Bibleverse|Luke|1:34}}</ref> This alludes to the belief that Mary conceived Jesus through the action of God the Holy Spirit, and not through [[human reproduction#Copulation|intercourse]] with Joseph or anyone else.<ref name="Miravalle-1993">Miravalle, Mark ''Introduction to Mary'', 1993, {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}}, pp. 56–64</ref>


The doctrines of the Assumption or Dormition of Mary relate to her death and bodily assumption to heaven. Roman Catholic Church has dogmatically defined the doctrine of the Assumption, which was done in 1950 by [[Pope Pius XII]] in {{lang|la|[[Munificentissimus Deus]]}}. Whether Mary died or not is not defined dogmatically, however, although a reference to the death of Mary is made in {{lang|la|Munificentissimus Deus}}. In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Assumption of the Virgin Mary is believed, and celebrated with her [[Dormition of the Mother of God|Dormition]], where they believe she died.
The doctrines of the Assumption or Dormition of Mary relate to her death and bodily assumption to heaven. Roman Catholic Church has dogmatically defined the doctrine of the Assumption, which was done in 1950 by [[Pope Pius XII]] in {{lang|la|[[Munificentissimus Deus]]}}. Whether Mary died or not is not defined dogmatically, however, although a reference to the death of Mary is made in {{lang|la|Munificentissimus Deus}}. In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Assumption of the Virgin Mary is believed, and celebrated with her [[Dormition of the Mother of God|Dormition]], where they believe she died.
Line 200: Line 205:
Catholics believe in the [[Immaculate Conception of Mary]], as proclaimed {{lang|la|[[ex cathedra]]}} by Pope [[Pius IX]] in 1854, namely that she was filled with grace from the very moment of her conception in her mother's womb and preserved from the stain of [[original sin]]. The [[Latin Church]] has a liturgical [[feast of the Immaculate Conception|feast by that name]], kept on 8 December.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Immaculate Conception |publisher=Newadvent.org |access-date=2 March 2010 |archive-date=5 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211205062347/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Orthodox Christians reject the Immaculate Conception dogma principally because their understanding of ancestral sin (the Greek term corresponding to the Latin "original sin") differs from the [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustinian]] interpretation and that of the Catholic Church.<ref>Ware, Timothy. ''The Orthodox Church'' (Penguin Books, 1963, {{ISBN|0-14-020592-6}}), pp. 263–264.</ref>
Catholics believe in the [[Immaculate Conception of Mary]], as proclaimed {{lang|la|[[ex cathedra]]}} by Pope [[Pius IX]] in 1854, namely that she was filled with grace from the very moment of her conception in her mother's womb and preserved from the stain of [[original sin]]. The [[Latin Church]] has a liturgical [[feast of the Immaculate Conception|feast by that name]], kept on 8 December.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Immaculate Conception |publisher=Newadvent.org |access-date=2 March 2010 |archive-date=5 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211205062347/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> Orthodox Christians reject the Immaculate Conception dogma principally because their understanding of ancestral sin (the Greek term corresponding to the Latin "original sin") differs from the [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustinian]] interpretation and that of the Catholic Church.<ref>Ware, Timothy. ''The Orthodox Church'' (Penguin Books, 1963, {{ISBN|0-14-020592-6}}), pp. 263–264.</ref>


The Perpetual Virginity of Mary asserts Mary's real and perpetual [[virginity]] even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made Man. The term Ever-Virgin (Greek {{lang|grc|ἀειπάρθενος}}) is applied in this case, stating that Mary remained a virgin for the remainder of her life, making Jesus her biological and only son, whose [[Incarnation (Christianity)|conception]] and [[Nativity of Jesus|birth]] are held to be miraculous.<ref name="Fahlbusch">Fahlbusch, Erwin, et al. ''The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3'' 2003 {{ISBN|90-04-12654-6}} pp. 403–409</ref><ref name="Miravalle56" /><ref>{{Cite CCC|2.1|499}}.</ref> The Orthodox Churches hold the position articulated in the [[Gospel of James|Protoevangelium of James]] that Jesus' brothers and sisters were Joseph's children from a marriage prior to that of Mary, which had left him widowed. Roman Catholic teaching follows the Latin father [[Jerome]] in considering them Jesus' cousins.
The Perpetual Virginity of Mary asserts Mary's real and perpetual [[virginity]] even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made Man. The term Ever-Virgin (Greek {{lang|grc|ἀειπάρθενος}}) is applied in this case, stating that Mary remained a virgin for the remainder of her life, making Jesus her biological and only son, whose [[Incarnation (Christianity)|conception]] and [[Nativity of Jesus|birth]] are held to be miraculous.<ref name="Fahlbusch-2003">Fahlbusch, Erwin, et al. ''The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3'' 2003, {{ISBN|90-04-12654-6}}, pp. 403–409.</ref><ref name="Miravalle-1993" /><ref>{{Cite CCC|2.1|499}}.</ref> The Orthodox Churches hold the position articulated in the [[Gospel of James|Protoevangelium of James]] that Jesus' brothers and sisters were Joseph's children from a marriage prior to that of Mary, which had left him widowed. Roman Catholic teaching follows the Latin father [[Jerome]] in considering them Jesus' cousins.


====Eastern Orthodox====
====Eastern Orthodox====
[[File:Santa Sofia - Mosaic de Joan II Comnè i la seva esposa, Irene.JPG|thumb|A [[mosaic]] from the [[Hagia Sophia]] of [[Constantinople]] (modern Istanbul), depicting Mary with Jesus, flanked by [[John II Komnenos]] (left) and his wife [[Irene of Hungary]] (right), {{circa|1118}} AD]]
[[File:Santa Sofia - Mosaic de Joan II Comnè i la seva esposa, Irene.JPG|thumb|A [[mosaic]] from the [[Hagia Sophia]] of [[Constantinople]] (modern Istanbul), depicting Mary with Jesus, flanked by [[John II Komnenos]] (left) and his wife [[Irene of Hungary]] (right), {{circa|1118}} AD]]
[[File:Молченская икона 1405 Путивль.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|right|15th century [[icon]] of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} ("God-bearer")]]
[[File:Молченская икона 1405 Путивль.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|right|15th century [[icon]] of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} ("God-bearer")]]
[[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox Christianity]] includes a large number of traditions regarding the Ever-Virgin Mary, the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}.<ref name="McNally168">McNally, Terrence, ''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} pp. 168–169</ref> The Orthodox believe that she was and remained a virgin before and after Christ's birth.<ref name=Fairbairn /> The {{transliteration|grc|[[Theotokia]]}} ([[Hymns to Mary|hymns to the Theotokos]]) are an essential part of the [[Divine Services]] in the [[Eastern Church]] and their positioning within the liturgical sequence effectively places the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} in the most prominent place after Christ.<ref name="Dragas">''Ecclesiasticus II: Orthodox Icons, Saints, Feasts and Prayer'' by George Dion Dragas 2005 {{ISBN|0-9745618-0-0}} pp. 81–83</ref> Within the Orthodox tradition, the order of the saints begins with: the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, Angels, Prophets, Apostles, Fathers and Martyrs, giving the Virgin Mary precedence over the angels. She is also proclaimed as the "Lady of the Angels".<ref name="Dragas" />
[[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox Christianity]] includes a large number of traditions regarding the Ever-Virgin Mary, the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}.<ref>McNally, Terrence, ''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} pp. 168–169</ref> The Orthodox believe that she was and remained a virgin before and after Christ's birth.<ref name="Fairbairn-2002" /> The {{transliteration|grc|[[Theotokia]]}} ([[Hymns to Mary|hymns to the Theotokos]]) are an essential part of the [[Divine Services]] in the [[Eastern Church]] and their positioning within the liturgical sequence effectively places the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} in the most prominent place after Christ.<ref name="Dragas-2005">''Ecclesiasticus II: Orthodox Icons, Saints, Feasts and Prayer'' by George Dion Dragas 2005 {{ISBN|0-9745618-0-0}} pp. 81–83</ref> Within the Orthodox tradition, the order of the saints begins with: the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, Angels, Prophets, Apostles, Fathers and Martyrs, giving the Virgin Mary precedence over the angels. She is also proclaimed as the "Lady of the Angels".<ref name="Dragas-2005" />
 
The views of the [[Church Fathers]] still play an important role in the shaping of Orthodox Marian perspective. However, the Orthodox views on Mary are mostly [[Doxology|doxological]], rather than academic: they are expressed in hymns, praise, liturgical poetry, and the veneration of icons. One of the most loved Orthodox [[Akathist]]s ([[Akathist to the Theotokos|standing hymns]]) is devoted to Mary and it is often simply called the ''[[Akathist to the Theotokos|Akathist Hymn]]''.<ref>''The Everything Mary Book'' by Jenny Schroedel 2006 {{ISBN|1-59337-713-4}} p. 90</ref> Five of the twelve [[Great Feasts]] in Orthodoxy are dedicated to Mary.<ref name="Fairbairn-2002" /> The [[Sunday of Orthodoxy]] directly links the Virgin Mary's identity as Mother of God with icon veneration.<ref>Vasilaka, Maria ''Images of the Mother of God: perceptions of the Theotokos in Byzantium'' 2005 {{ISBN|0-7546-3603-8}} p. 97</ref>
A number of Orthodox feasts are connected with the miraculous icons of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}.<ref name="Dragas-2005" />


The views of the [[Church Fathers]] still play an important role in the shaping of Orthodox Marian perspective. However, the Orthodox views on Mary are mostly [[Doxology|doxological]], rather than academic: they are expressed in hymns, praise, liturgical poetry, and the veneration of icons. One of the most loved Orthodox [[Akathist]]s ([[Akathist to the Theotokos|standing hymns]]) is devoted to Mary and it is often simply called the ''[[Akathist to the Theotokos|Akathist Hymn]]''.<ref>''The Everything Mary Book'' by Jenny Schroedel 2006 {{ISBN|1-59337-713-4}} p. 90</ref> Five of the twelve [[Great Feasts]] in Orthodoxy are dedicated to Mary.<ref name="Fairbairn" /> The [[Sunday of Orthodoxy]] directly links the Virgin Mary's identity as Mother of God with icon veneration.<ref>Vasilaka, Maria ''Images of the Mother of God: perceptions of the Theotokos in Byzantium'' 2005 {{ISBN|0-7546-3603-8}} p. 97</ref>
[[File:Virgin of the Passion by E.Tzanfournaris.jpg|thumb|upright=1|left|''(Panagía tou Páthous) [[Virgin of the Passion]]'' by [[Emmanuel Tzanfournaris]], early 1600s]]
A number of Orthodox feasts are connected with the miraculous icons of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}.<ref name="Dragas" />


The Orthodox view Mary as "superior to all created beings", although not divine.<ref name="Bulgakov" /> As such, the designation of Saint to Mary as Saint Mary is not appropriate.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.orthodoxengland.org.uk/titles.htm|title=Orthodox Holiness: The Titles Of The Saints|website=www.orthodoxengland.org.uk|access-date=30 July 2019|archive-date=14 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211114061835/https://www.orthodoxengland.org.uk/titles.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> The Orthodox does not venerate Mary as conceived immaculate. [[Gregory of Nazianzus]], [[Archbishop of Constantinople]] in the 4th century AD, speaking on the Nativity of Jesus Christ argues that "Conceived by the Virgin, who first in body and soul was purified by the Holy Ghost, He came forth as God with that which He had assumed, One Person in two Natures, Flesh and Spirit, of which the latter defined the former."<ref>{{cite book|title=In theophania|author=Gregorius Nazianzenus|work=Documenta Catholica Omnia|url=https://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/04z/z_0329-0390__Gregorius_Nazianzenus__In_theophania__EN.pdf.html|access-date=23 February 2018|archive-date=12 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210812151055/https://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/04z/z_0329-0390__Gregorius_Nazianzenus__In_theophania__EN.pdf.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The Orthodox celebrate the [[Dormition of the Theotokos]], rather than Assumption.<ref name="Fairbairn" />
The Orthodox view Mary as "superior to all created beings", although not divine.<ref name="Bulgakov-1997" /> As such, the designation of Saint to Mary as Saint Mary is not appropriate.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.orthodoxengland.org.uk/titles.htm|title=Orthodox Holiness: The Titles Of The Saints|website=www.orthodoxengland.org.uk|access-date=30 July 2019|archive-date=14 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211114061835/https://www.orthodoxengland.org.uk/titles.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> The Orthodox does not venerate Mary as conceived immaculate. [[Gregory of Nazianzus]], [[Archbishop of Constantinople]] in the 4th century AD, speaking on the Nativity of Jesus Christ argues that "Conceived by the Virgin, who first in body and soul was purified by the Holy Ghost, He came forth as God with that which He had assumed, One Person in two Natures, Flesh and Spirit, of which the latter defined the former."<ref>{{cite book |author=Nazianzenus |first=Gregorius |url=https://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/04z/z_0329-0390__Gregorius_Nazianzenus__In_theophania__EN.pdf.html |title=Documenta Catholica Omnia |chapter=In theophania |access-date=23 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210812151055/https://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/04z/z_0329-0390__Gregorius_Nazianzenus__In_theophania__EN.pdf.html |archive-date=12 August 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> The Orthodox celebrate the [[Dormition of the Theotokos]], rather than Assumption.<ref name="Fairbairn-2002" />


The [[Protoevangelium of James]], an [[Biblical canon|extra-canonical]] book, has been the source of many Orthodox beliefs on Mary. The account of Mary's life presented includes her consecration as a virgin at the temple at age three. The [[Kohen|high priest]] Zachariah blessed Mary and informed her that God had magnified her name among many generations. Zachariah placed Mary on the third step of the altar, whereby God gave her grace. While in the temple, Mary was miraculously fed by an angel, until she was 12 years old. At that point, an angel told Zachariah to betroth Mary to a widower in Israel, who would be indicated. This story provides the theme of many hymns for the Feast of [[Presentation of Mary]], and icons of the feast depict the story.<ref name="Wybrew">Wybrew, Hugh ''Orthodox feasts of Jesus Christ & the Virgin Mary: liturgical texts'' 2000 {{ISBN|0-88141-203-1}} pp. 37–46</ref> The Orthodox believe that Mary was instrumental in the growth of Christianity during the life of Jesus, and after his Crucifixion, and Orthodox theologian [[Sergei Bulgakov]] has written: "The Virgin Mary is the centre, invisible, but real, of the Apostolic Church."
The [[Protoevangelium of James]], an [[Biblical canon|extra-canonical]] book, has been the source of many Orthodox beliefs on Mary. The account of Mary's life presented includes her consecration as a virgin at the temple at age three. The [[Kohen|high priest]] Zachariah blessed Mary and informed her that God had magnified her name among many generations. Zachariah placed Mary on the third step of the altar, whereby God gave her grace. While in the temple, Mary was miraculously fed by an angel, until she was 12 years old. At that point, an angel told Zachariah to betroth Mary to a widower in Israel, who would be indicated. This story provides the theme of many hymns for the Feast of [[Presentation of Mary]], and icons of the feast depict the story.<ref>Wybrew, Hugh ''Orthodox feasts of Jesus Christ & the Virgin Mary: liturgical texts'' 2000 {{ISBN|0-88141-203-1}} pp. 37–46</ref> The Orthodox believe that Mary was instrumental in the growth of Christianity during the life of Jesus, and after his Crucifixion, and Orthodox theologian [[Sergei Bulgakov]] has written: "The Virgin Mary is the centre, invisible, but real, of the Apostolic Church."


Theologians from the Orthodox tradition have made prominent contributions to the development of Marian thought and devotion.
Theologians from the Orthodox tradition have made prominent contributions to the development of Marian thought and devotion.
[[John Damascene]] ({{circa|650|750}}) was one of the greatest Orthodox theologians. Among other Marian writings, he proclaimed the essential nature of Mary's heavenly Assumption or Dormition and her meditative role.
[[John Damascene]] ({{circa|650|750}}) was one of the greatest Orthodox theologians. Among other Marian writings, he proclaimed the essential nature of Mary's heavenly Assumption or Dormition and her meditative role.
{{blockquote|It was necessary that the body of the one who preserved her virginity intact in giving birth should also be kept incorrupt after death. It was necessary that she, who carried the Creator in her womb when he was a baby, should dwell among the tabernacles of heaven.<ref>Damascene, John. ''Homily 2 on the Dormition 14''; p. 96, 741 B</ref>}}
{{blockquote|It was necessary that the body of the one who preserved her virginity intact in giving birth should also be kept incorrupt after death. It was necessary that she, who carried the Creator in her womb when he was a baby, should dwell among the tabernacles of heaven.<ref>Damascene, John. ''Homily 2 on the Dormition 14''; p. 96, 741 B</ref>}}


{{blockquote|From her we have harvested the grape of life; from her we have cultivated the seed of immortality. For our sake she became Mediatrix of all blessings; in her God became man, and man became God.<ref>Damascene, John. ''Homily 2 on the Dormition 16''; p. 96, 744 D</ref>}}
{{blockquote|From her we have harvested the grape of life; from her we have cultivated the seed of immortality. For our sake she became Mediatrix of all blessings; in her God became man, and man became God.<ref>Damascene, John. ''Homily 2 on the Dormition 16''; p. 96, 744 D</ref>}}


More recently, [[Sergei Bulgakov]] expressed the Orthodox sentiments towards Mary as follows:<ref name="Bulgakov" />
More recently, [[Sergei Bulgakov]] expressed the Orthodox sentiments towards Mary as follows:<ref name="Bulgakov-1997" />


{{blockquote|Mary is not merely the instrument, but the direct positive condition of the Incarnation, its human aspect. Christ could not have been incarnate by some mechanical process, violating human nature. It was necessary for that nature itself to say for itself, by the mouth of the most pure human being: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it unto me according to Thy word."}}
{{blockquote|Mary is not merely the instrument, but the direct positive condition of the Incarnation, its human aspect. Christ could not have been incarnate by some mechanical process, violating human nature. It was necessary for that nature itself to say for itself, by the mouth of the most pure human being: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it unto me according to Thy word."}}
Line 228: Line 234:
{{Further|Protestant views on Mary}}
{{Further|Protestant views on Mary}}
[[File:MaryattheTomb.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|right|Stained glass window of [[Christ taking leave of his Mother|Jesus leaving his mother]], in a [[St. Matthew's German Evangelical Lutheran Church|Lutheran church]] in South Carolina]]
[[File:MaryattheTomb.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|right|Stained glass window of [[Christ taking leave of his Mother|Jesus leaving his mother]], in a [[St. Matthew's German Evangelical Lutheran Church|Lutheran church]] in South Carolina]]
Protestants in general reject the veneration and invocation of the Saints.<ref name=protestantencyclopedia/>{{rp|1174}} They share the belief that Mary is the mother of Jesus and "blessed among women" (Luke 1:42)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:42}}</ref> but they generally do not agree that Mary is to be venerated. She is considered to be an outstanding example of a life dedicated to God.<ref>{{citation |last1=Geisler |first1=Norman L. |first2=Ralph E. |last2=MacKenzie |title=Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: agreements and differences |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-8010-3875-4 |page=143}}</ref> As such, they tend not to accept certain church doctrines such as her being preserved from sin.<ref>White, James (1998). ''Mary – Another Redeemer?''. Bethany House Publishers.</ref> Theologian [[Karl Barth]] wrote that "the heresy of the Catholic Church is its [[Mariology]]".<ref name="Barth Karl pages 143-144">{{citation |last=Barth |first=Karl |title=Church dogmatics |date=2004 |volume=1 |isbn=978-0-567-05069-4 |pages=143–144}}</ref>
Protestants in general reject the veneration and invocation of the Saints.<ref name="Hillerbrand-2004"/>{{rp|1174}} They share the belief that Mary is the mother of Jesus and "blessed among women" (Luke 1:42)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Luke|1:42}}</ref> but they generally do not agree that Mary is to be venerated. She is considered to be an outstanding example of a life dedicated to God.<ref>{{citation |last1=Geisler |first1=Norman L. |first2=Ralph E. |last2=MacKenzie |title=Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: agreements and differences |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-8010-3875-4 |page=143|publisher=Baker Publishing }}</ref> As such, they tend not to accept certain church doctrines such as her being preserved from sin.<ref>White, James (1998). ''Mary – Another Redeemer?''. Bethany House Publishers.</ref> Theologian [[Karl Barth]] wrote that "the heresy of the Catholic Church is its [[Mariology]]".<ref>{{citation |last=Barth |first=Karl |title=Church dogmatics |date=2004 |volume=1 |isbn=978-0-567-05069-4 |pages=143–144|publisher=A&C Black }}</ref>
 
Early Protestantism had high regard for Mary. [[Martin Luther]] wrote that: "Mary is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin. God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil."<ref>Lehmann, H., ed. ''Luther's Works, American edition,'' vol. 43, p. 40, Fortress, 1968.</ref> [[John Calvin]] remarked, "It cannot be denied that God in choosing and destining Mary to be the Mother of his Son, granted her the highest honor."{{efn|Alternately: "It cannot even be denied that God conferred the highest honour on Mary, by choosing and appointing her to be the mother of his Son."<ref>''Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke'', 1845, Jean Calvin, Rev. William Pringle, Edinburgh, Volume 2, [https://books.google.com/books?id=sH49AAAAYAAJ&q=%22highest+honour+on+Mary%22&pg=PA87 p. 87 quote] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211208145816/https://books.google.com/books?id=sH49AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA87#v=onepage&q=%22highest%20honour%20on%20Mary%22&f=false |date=8 December 2021 }}</ref><ref>"Neque etiam negari potest, quin Deus Mariam Filio suo matrem eligens ac destinans summo eam honore dignatus sit."  Calvin's ''Opera'', vol. 45 ([[Corpus Reformatorum]], vol. 73), p. 348. [https://archive.org/details/ioanniscalvinio09calvgoog/page/n183 <!-- pg=347 quote="matrem eligens ac destinans summo eam honore". --> no preview]</ref>}} However, Calvin firmly rejected the notion that Mary can intercede between Christ and man.<ref>{{citation |last=McKim |first=Donald K. |title=The Cambridge companion to John Calvin |year=2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-01672-8}}.</ref>


Some early Protestants venerated Mary. [[Martin Luther]] wrote that: "Mary is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin. God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil."<ref>Lehmann, H., ed. ''Luther's Works, American edition,'' vol. 43, p. 40, Fortress, 1968.</ref> However, as of 1532, Luther stopped celebrating the feast of the [[Assumption of Mary]] and also discontinued his support of the [[Immaculate Conception]].<ref>{{citation | last = Lee | title = Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison | year = 1993 | isbn = 978-0-615-16635-3 | page = 249}}</ref> [[John Calvin]] remarked, "It cannot be denied that God in choosing and destining Mary to be the Mother of his Son, granted her the highest honor."{{efn|Alternately: "It cannot even be denied that God conferred the highest honour on Mary, by choosing and appointing her to be the mother of his Son."<ref>''Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke'', 1845, Jean Calvin, Rev. William Pringle, Edinburgh, Volume 2, [https://books.google.com/books?id=sH49AAAAYAAJ&q=%22highest+honour+on+Mary%22&pg=PA87 p. 87 quote] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211208145816/https://books.google.com/books?id=sH49AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA87#v=onepage&q=%22highest%20honour%20on%20Mary%22&f=false |date=8 December 2021 }}</ref><ref>"Neque etiam negari potest, quin Deus Mariam Filio suo matrem eligens ac destinans summo eam honore dignatus sit."  Calvin's ''Opera'', vol. 45 ([[Corpus Reformatorum]], vol. 73), p. 348. [https://archive.org/details/ioanniscalvinio09calvgoog/page/n183 <!-- pg=347 quote="matrem eligens ac destinans summo eam honore". --> no preview]</ref>}} However, Calvin firmly rejected the notion that Mary can intercede between Christ and man.<ref>{{citation | last = McKim | first = Donald K | title = The Cambridge companion to John Calvin | year = 2004 | isbn = 978-0-521-01672-8}}</ref>
Although Calvin and [[Huldrych Zwingli]] honored Mary as the Mother of Christ in the 16th century, they did so less than Martin Luther.<ref>{{citation | last = Haffner | first = Paul | title = The mystery of Mary | year = 2004 | isbn = 978-0-85244-650-8 | page = 11| publisher = Gracewing }}</ref> Thus the idea of respect and high honor for Mary was not rejected by the first Protestants; however, they came to criticize the Roman Catholics for venerating Mary. Following the [[Council of Trent]] in the 16th century, as Marian veneration became associated with Catholics, Protestant interest in Mary decreased. During the Age of the Enlightenment, any residual interest in Mary within Protestant churches almost disappeared, although Anglicans and Lutherans continued to honor her.<ref name="Hillerbrand-2004" />


Although Calvin and [[Huldrych Zwingli]] honored Mary as the Mother of Christ in the 16th century, they did so less than Martin Luther.<ref>{{citation | last = Haffner | first = Paul | title = The mystery of Mary | year = 2004 | isbn = 978-0-85244-650-8 | page = 11}}</ref> Thus the idea of respect and high honor for Mary was not rejected by the first Protestants; however, they came to criticize the Roman Catholics for venerating Mary. Following the [[Council of Trent]] in the 16th century, as Marian veneration became associated with Catholics, Protestant interest in Mary decreased. During the Age of the Enlightenment, any residual interest in Mary within Protestant churches almost disappeared, although Anglicans and Lutherans continued to honor her.<ref name=protestantencyclopedia />
In the 20th century, some Protestants reacted in opposition to the Catholic dogma of the [[Assumption of Mary]].<ref>Williams, Paul (2007). pp. 238, 251, quote: "Where Anglican writers discuss the doctrine of the Assumption, it is either rejected or held to be of the ''adiaphora''."</ref> The tone of the [[Second Vatican Council]] began to mend the ecumenical differences, and Protestants began to show interest in Marian themes.{{citation needed|date=December 2020}} In 1997 and 1998, ecumenical dialogues between Catholics and Protestants took place, but, to date, the majority of Protestants disagree with Marian veneration and some view it as a challenge to the [[Sola Scriptura|authority of Scripture]].<ref name="Hillerbrand-2004" />{{better source needed|date=December 2020}}


In the 20th century, some Protestants reacted in opposition to the Catholic dogma of the [[Assumption of Mary]].{{citation needed|date=September 2020}} The tone of the [[Second Vatican Council]] began to mend the ecumenical differences, and Protestants began to show interest in Marian themes.{{citation needed|date=December 2020}} In 1997 and 1998, ecumenical dialogues between Catholics and Protestants took place, but, to date, the majority of Protestants disagree with Marian veneration and some view it as a challenge to the [[Sola Scriptura|authority of Scripture]].<ref name=protestantencyclopedia />{{better source needed|date=December 2020}}
=====Lutheran=====
{{Main|Lutheran Mariology}}


====Anglican====
[[File:Gettorf Altar.jpg|thumb|Mary with an inscription referencing Luke 1:46–47 in St. Jürgen (Lutheran) church in [[Gettorf]] (Schleswig-Holstein)]]
{{Main|Anglican Marian theology}}
[[Lutheranism|Evangelical-Lutheranism]] regards her as the ''Blessed Virgin Mary'', with this codified in the Formula of Concord.<ref name="Anderson-1992">{{cite book |last1=Anderson |first1=Hugh George |last2=Stafford |first2=J. Francis |last3=Burgess |first3=Joseph A. |title=The One Mediator, the Saints, and Mary |date=1992 |publisher=Alban Books |isbn=978-0-8066-2579-9 |page=241 |language=en |quote=In the Smalcald Articles of 1537 Luther reaffirmed Mary's perpetual virginity, calling her "ever virgin” (semper virgo). The Formula of Concord of 1577 repeated Mary's ancient ecumenical title “God-bearer” (Theotokos) and praised her as “the most blessed virgin” (laudtissima virgo).}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Carlson |first1=Kristofer |title=The Book of Concord on Mariology |url=https://wmm.dormitionpress.org/archives/33 |publisher=Dormition Press |access-date=30 July 2025 |date=5 July 2013 |quote=The descriptive title of “most blessed Virgin Mary” is, of course, a reference to the Annunciation, where the angel Gabriel said “blessed art thou among women” (Luke 1:28). It is also a reference to the Visitation, where Elizabeth shouted in the Spirit: “Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. …And blessed is she that believed” (Luke 1:42, 45). And finally, it is a reference to the Magnificat, where Mary says: “From henceforth all generations shall call me blessed” (Luke 1:48). |archive-date=16 October 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251016194930/http://wmm.dormitionpress.org/archives/33 |url-status=live }}</ref> The Evangelical-Lutheran Churches celebrate several Marian feast days, including the [[Feast of the Annunciation|Feast of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary]], [[Candlemas|Feast of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary]], and the [[Visitation (Christianity)|Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary]].<ref name="Wengert-2017">{{cite book |last1=Wengert |first1=Timothy J. |last2=Granquist |first2=Mark A. |last3=Haemig |first3=Mary |last4=Kolb |first4=Robert |last5=Mattes |first5=Mark |last6=Strom |first6=Jonathan |title=Dictionary of Luther and the Lutheran Traditions |date=22 August 2017 |publisher=Baker Academic |isbn=978-1-4934-1023-1 |language=en|quote=The Lutheran confessions maintain the traditional christological titles for Mary (e.g., Theotokos) and no not dispute the question of her perpetual virginity. Likewise, Lutherans retaind the (biblical) Marian feast days of the Annunciation, the Purification of Mary, and the Visitation.}}</ref> The [[Formula of Concord]] and the [[Smalcald Articles]], upheld by the Lutheran Churches, teach the [[Virgin birth of Jesus|virgin birth]], ''[[Theotokos]]'' and the [[perpetual virginity of Mary]].<ref name="Smith-2010">{{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Gordon T. |title=The Lord's Supper: Five Views |date=4 February 2010 |publisher=InterVarsity Press |isbn=978-0-8308-7868-0 |page=44 |language=en|quote=Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, art. 8.15ff. (Tappert, pp. 594ff.) Notice well the strong avowal of Mary's Mother-of-God title (and of her perpetual virginity) in Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, art. 8.24.}}</ref><ref name="Anderson-1992"/> The [[Apology of the Augsburg Confession]] teaches that "blessed Mary prays for the Church".<ref>{{cite book |last1=McDonnell |first1=Kilian |title=Mary and the Protestants |date=1960 |publisher=[[College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University]] |page=35}}</ref>
The various churches that form the [[Anglican Communion]] and the [[Continuing Anglican]] movement have different views on Marian doctrines and venerative practices given that there is no single church with universal authority within the Communion and that the mother church (the [[Church of England]]) understands itself to be both "Catholic" and "[[Protestant Reformation|Reformed]]".<ref>Milton, Anthony ''Catholic and Reformed'' 2002 {{ISBN|0-521-89329-1}} p. 5</ref> Thus unlike the Protestant churches at large, the Anglican Communion includes segments which still retain some veneration of Mary.<ref name=Schroedel81 >Schroedel, Jenny ''The Everything Mary Book'', 2006 {{ISBN|1-59337-713-4}} pp. 81–85</ref>


Mary's special position within God's purpose of salvation as "God-bearer" is recognised in a number of ways by some Anglican Christians.<ref name=Braaten >Braaten, Carl, et al. ''Mary, Mother of God'' 2004 {{ISBN|0-8028-2266-5}} p. 13</ref> All the member churches of the Anglican Communion affirm in the historic creeds that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, and celebrates the feast days of the [[Presentation of Christ in the Temple]]. This feast is called in older [[Book of Common Prayer|prayer books]] the [[Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary]] on 2 February. The [[Annunciation]] of our Lord to the Blessed Virgin on 25 March was from before the time of [[Bede]] until the 18th century New Year's Day in England. The Annunciation is called the "Annunciation of our Lady" in the 1662 [[Book of Common Prayer]]. Anglicans also celebrate in the [[Visitation (Christian)|Visitation of the Blessed Virgin]] on 31 May, though in some provinces the traditional date of 2 July is kept. The feast of the St. Mary the Virgin is observed on the traditional day of the Assumption, 15 August. The [[Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary|Nativity]] of the Blessed Virgin is kept on 8 September.<ref name=Schroedel81 />
Theologians agree that Martin Luther adhered to the Marian decrees of the [[ecumenical council]]s and dogmas of the church. He held fast to the belief that Mary was a perpetual virgin and Mother of God.<ref>Bäumer, Remigius. ''Marienlexikon Gesamtausgabe'', Leo Scheffczyk, ed., (Regensburg: Institutum Marianum, 1994), 190.</ref><ref>{{citation |title=The Everything Mary Book |first=Jenny |last=Schroedel |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-59337-713-7 |pages=125–126|publisher=Adams Media }}</ref> Special attention is given to the assertion that Luther, some 300 years before the dogmatization of the [[Immaculate Conception]] by [[Pope Pius IX]] in 1854, was a firm adherent of that view.{{Citation needed|date=January 2018}} Others maintain that Luther in later years changed his position on the Immaculate Conception, which, at that time was undefined in the church, maintaining however the [[Sinlessness of Mary|sinlessness of Mary throughout her life]].<ref>{{citation |last=Jackson |first=Gregory Lee |title=Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison |year=1993 | isbn = 978-0-615-16635-3 | page = 249|publisher=Lulu.com }}</ref><ref>Bäumer, 191</ref> For Luther, early in his life, the Assumption of Mary was an understood fact, although he later stated that the Bible did not say anything about it and stopped celebrating its feast. Important to him was the belief that Mary and the saints do live on after death.<ref>{{citation |last=Haffner |first=Paul |title=The mystery of Mary |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-85244-650-8 |page=223|publisher=Gracewing }}</ref><ref>Bäumer, 190.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Colonna |first1=Vittoria |first2=Chiara |last2=Matraini |first3=Lucrezia |last3=Marinella |title=Who Is Mary? |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-226-11400-2 |page=34|publisher=University of Chicago Press }}</ref> "Throughout his career as a priest-professor-reformer, Luther preached, taught, and argued about the veneration of Mary with a verbosity that ranged from childlike piety to sophisticated polemics. His views are intimately linked to his Christocentric theology and its consequences for liturgy and piety."<ref>{{Cite book|author=[[Eric W. Gritsch]] |editor1=H. George Anderson |editor2=J. Francis Stafford |editor3=Joseph A. Burgess |title=The One Mediator, The Saints and Mary, Lutherans and Roman Catholic in Dialogue |volume=VII |location=Minneapolis |publisher=Augsburg Fortress |year=1992 |page=235}}</ref> Luther, while revering Mary, came to criticize the "Papists" for blurring the line between high admiration of the grace of God wherever it is seen in a human being, and religious service given to another creature. He considered the Roman Catholic practice of celebrating [[saint]]s' days and making intercessory requests addressed especially to Mary and other departed saints to be [[idolatry]].<ref>''Luther's Works'', 47, pp. 45f.</ref><ref>''Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue'' VIII, p. 29.</ref> His final thoughts on Marian devotion and veneration are preserved in a sermon preached at Wittenberg only a month before his death:


The Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary is kept in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer, on 8 December. In certain [[Anglo-Catholic]] parishes this feast is called the Immaculate Conception. Again, the Assumption of Mary is believed in by most Anglo-Catholics, but is considered a [[Piety|pious]] opinion by moderate Anglicans. Protestant-minded Anglicans reject the celebration of these feasts.<ref name=Schroedel81 />
{{blockquote|Therefore, when we preach faith, that we should worship nothing but God alone, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, as we say in the Creed: 'I believe in God the Father almighty and in Jesus Christ,' then we are remaining in the temple at Jerusalem. Again,'This is my beloved Son; listen to him.' 'You will find him in a manger'. He alone does it. But reason says the opposite:


Prayers and venerative practices vary greatly. For instance, as of the 19th century, following the [[Oxford Movement]], [[Anglo-Catholic]]s frequently pray the [[Rosary]], the {{lang|la|[[Angelus]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Regina caeli]]}}, and other litanies and anthems of Mary reminiscent of Catholic practices.<ref>Burnham, Andrew ''A Pocket Manual of Anglo-Catholic Devotion'' 2004 {{ISBN|1-85311-530-4}} pp. 1, 266, 310, 330</ref> Conversely, [[low church]] Anglicans rarely invoke the Blessed Virgin except in certain hymns, such as the second stanza of ''[[Ye Watchers and Ye Holy Ones]]''.<ref name=Braaten /><ref>Duckworth, Penelope, ''Mary: The Imagination of Her Heart'' 2004 {{ISBN|1-56101-260-2}} pp. 3–5</ref>
What, us? Are we to worship only Christ? Indeed, shouldn't we also honor the holy mother of Christ? She is the woman who bruised the head of the serpent. Hear us, Mary, for thy Son so honors thee that he can refuse thee nothing. Here [[Bernard of Clairvaux|Bernard]] went too far in his ''Homilies on the Gospel: Missus est Angelus''.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tA9HQwAACAAJ&q=%22Missus+est+Angelus+gabriel%22+bernard |title=Homiliae S. Bernardi super evangelio: "Missus est angelus Gabriel" – saint Bernard de Clairvaux – Google Boeken |access-date=30 September 2013 |last1=Clairvaux |first1=Saint Bernard de |year=1476 |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417211244/https://books.google.com/books?id=tA9HQwAACAAJ&q=%22Missus+est+Angelus+gabriel%22+bernard |url-status=live }}</ref> God has commanded that we should honor the parents; therefore I will call upon Mary. She will intercede for me with the Son, and the Son with the Father, who will listen to the Son. So you have the picture of God as angry and Christ as judge; Mary shows to Christ her breast and Christ shows his wounds to the wrathful Father. That's the kind of thing this comely bride, the wisdom of reason cooks up: Mary is the mother of Christ, surely Christ will listen to her; Christ is a stern judge, therefore I will call upon St. George and St. Christopher. No, we have been by God's command baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, just as the Jews were circumcised.<ref>{{citation |contribution=Sermon on the Second Sunday after Epiphany |orig-year=1546 |series=Luther's Works |volume=51 |title=Sermons I |editor1-first=John W. |editor1-last=Doberstein |editor2-first=Helmut T. |editor2-last=Lehmann |publisher=Fortress Press |year=1959 |isbn=978-0-8006-0351-9 |page=375}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Dr. Martin Luthers Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe |year=1883 |place=Weimar |volume=51 |page=128}}</ref>}}


The [[Society of Mary (Anglican)|Anglican Society of Mary]] was formed in 1931 and maintains chapters in many countries. The purpose of the society is to foster devotion to Mary among Anglicans.<ref name=Schroedel81 /><ref>''Church of England yearbook: Volume 123'' 2006 {{ISBN|0-7151-1020-9}} p. 315</ref> [[High church]] Anglicans espouse doctrines that are closer to Roman Catholics, and retain veneration for Mary, such as [[Christian pilgrimage|Anglican pilgrimages]] to [[Our Lady of Lourdes]], which have taken place since 1963, and [[Christian pilgrimage|pilgrimages]] to [[Our Lady of Walsingham]], which have taken place for hundreds of years.<ref>Perrier, Jacques, ''Lourdes Today and Tomorrow'' 2008 {{ISBN|1565483057}} p. 56</ref>
Certain Lutheran churches such as the [[Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church]] venerate Mary and the saints in the same manner that Roman Catholics do, and hold all Marian dogmas as part of their faith.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://anglolutherancatholic.org/laypeople/more-faq/ |access-date=11 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100523163135/https://anglolutherancatholic.org/laypeople/more-faq/ |title=More FAQ |publisher=The Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church |archive-date=23 May 2010}}</ref>


Historically, there has been enough common ground between Roman Catholics and Anglicans on Marian issues that in 2005, a joint statement called ''Mary: grace and hope in Christ'' was produced through ecumenical meetings of Anglicans and Roman Catholic theologians. This document, informally known as the "Seattle Statement", is not formally endorsed by either the Catholic Church or the Anglican Communion, but is viewed by its authors as the beginning of a joint understanding of Mary.<ref name="Schroedel81" /><ref>''Mary: grace and hope in Christ: the Seattle statement of the Anglican-Roman Catholics'' by the Anglican/Roman Catholic International Group 2006 {{ISBN|0-8264-8155-8}} pp. 7–10</ref>
=====Anglican=====
{{Main|Anglican Marian theology}}


====Lutheran====
The various churches that form the [[Anglican Communion]] and the [[Continuing Anglican]] movement have different views on Marian doctrines and venerative practices given that there is no single church with universal authority within the Communion and that the mother church (the [[Church of England]]) understands itself to be both "Catholic" and "[[Reformed Christianity|Reformed]]".<ref>Milton, Anthony ''Catholic and Reformed'' 2002 {{ISBN|0-521-89329-1}} p. 5</ref> The Anglican Communion includes segments which still retain some veneration of Mary.<ref name="Schroedel-2006" >Schroedel, Jenny ''The Everything Mary Book'', 2006 {{ISBN|1-59337-713-4}} pp. 81–85</ref>
{{Main|Lutheran Mariology}}
[[File:Gettorf Altar.jpg|thumb|Mary with an inscription referencing Luke 1:46–47 in St. Jürgen (Lutheran) church in [[Gettorf]] (Schleswig-Holstein)]]


Despite Martin Luther's harsh polemics against his Roman Catholic opponents over issues concerning Mary and the saints, theologians appear to agree that Luther adhered to the Marian decrees of the [[ecumenical council]]s and dogmas of the church. He held fast to the belief that Mary was a perpetual virgin and Mother of God.<ref>Bäumer, Remigius. ''Marienlexikon Gesamtausgabe'', Leo Scheffczyk, ed., (Regensburg: Institutum Marianum, 1994), 190.</ref><ref name="Schroedel">{{citation |title=The Everything Mary Book |first=Jenny |last=Schroedel |year=2006 |isbn=978-1-59337-713-7 |pages=125–126}}</ref> Special attention is given to the assertion that Luther, some 300 years before the dogmatization of the [[Immaculate Conception]] by [[Pope Pius IX]] in 1854, was a firm adherent of that view{{Citation needed|date=January 2018}}. Others maintain that Luther in later years changed his position on the Immaculate Conception, which, at that time was undefined in the church, maintaining however the [[Sinlessness of Mary|sinlessness of Mary throughout her life]].<ref>{{citation |last=Jackson |first=Gregory Lee |title=Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison |year=1993 | isbn = 978-0-615-16635-3 | page = 249}}</ref><ref>Bäumer, 191</ref> For Luther, early in his life, the Assumption of Mary was an understood fact, although he later stated that the Bible did not say anything about it and stopped celebrating its feast. Important to him was the belief that Mary and the saints do live on after death.<ref>{{citation |last=Haffner |first=Paul |title=The mystery of Mary |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-85244-650-8 |page=223}}</ref><ref>Bäumer, 190.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Colonna |first1=Vittoria |first2=Chiara |last2=Matraini |first3=Lucrezia |last3=Marinella |title=Who Is Mary? |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-226-11400-2 |page=34}}</ref> "Throughout his career as a priest-professor-reformer, Luther preached, taught, and argued about the veneration of Mary with a verbosity that ranged from childlike piety to sophisticated polemics. His views are intimately linked to his Christocentric theology and its consequences for liturgy and piety."<ref>{{Cite book|author=[[Eric W. Gritsch]] |editor1=H. George Anderson |editor2=J. Francis Stafford |editor3=Joseph A. Burgess |title=The One Mediator, The Saints and Mary, Lutherans and Roman Catholic in Dialogue |volume=VII |location=Minneapolis |publisher=Augsburg Fortress |year=1992 |page=235}}</ref>
Mary's special position within God's purpose of salvation as "God-bearer" is recognized in a number of ways by some Anglican Christians.<ref name="Braaten-2004" >Braaten, Carl, et al. ''Mary, Mother of God'' 2004 {{ISBN|0-8028-2266-5}} p. 13</ref> All the member churches of the Anglican Communion affirm in the historic creeds that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, and celebrates the feast days of the [[Presentation of Christ in the Temple]]. This feast is called in older [[Book of Common Prayer|prayer books]] the [[Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary]] on 2 February. The [[Annunciation]] of our Lord to the Blessed Virgin on 25 March was from before the time of [[Bede]] until the 18th century New Year's Day in England. The Annunciation is called the "Annunciation of our Lady" in the 1662 [[Book of Common Prayer]]. Anglicans also celebrate in the [[Visitation (Christian)|Visitation of the Blessed Virgin]] on 31 May, though in some provinces the traditional date of 2 July is kept. The feast of the St. Mary the Virgin is observed on the traditional day of the Assumption, 15 August. The [[Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary|Nativity]] of the Blessed Virgin is kept on 8 September.<ref name="Schroedel-2006" />


Luther, while revering Mary, came to criticize the "Papists" for blurring the line between high admiration of the grace of God wherever it is seen in a human being, and religious service given to another creature. He considered the Roman Catholic practice of celebrating [[saint]]s' days and making intercessory requests addressed especially to Mary and other departed saints to be [[idolatry]].<ref>''Luther's Works'', 47, pp. 45f.</ref><ref>''Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue'' VIII, p. 29.</ref> His final thoughts on Marian devotion and veneration are preserved in a sermon preached at Wittenberg only a month before his death:
The Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary is kept in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer, on 8 December. In certain Anglican parishes of [[Anglo-Catholic]] churchmanship, this feast is called the Immaculate Conception. Again, the Assumption of Mary is believed in by most Anglo-Catholics, but is considered a [[Piety|pious]] opinion by moderate Anglicans. [[Reformed Anglican]]s reject the celebration of these feasts.<ref name="Schroedel-2006" />


{{blockquote|Therefore, when we preach faith, that we should worship nothing but God alone, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, as we say in the Creed: 'I believe in God the Father almighty and in Jesus Christ,' then we are remaining in the temple at Jerusalem. Again,'This is my beloved Son; listen to him.' 'You will find him in a manger'. He alone does it. But reason says the opposite:
Prayers and venerative practices vary greatly. For instance, as of the 19th century, following the [[Oxford Movement]], [[Anglo-Catholic]]s frequently pray the [[Rosary]], the {{lang|la|[[Angelus]]}}, {{lang|la|[[Regina caeli]]}}, and other litanies and anthems of Mary reminiscent of Catholic practices.<ref>Burnham, Andrew ''A Pocket Manual of Anglo-Catholic Devotion'' 2004 {{ISBN|1-85311-530-4}} pp. 1, 266, 310, 330</ref> Conversely, [[low church]] Anglicans rarely invoke the Blessed Virgin except in certain hymns, such as the second stanza of ''[[Ye Watchers and Ye Holy Ones]]''.<ref name="Braaten-2004" /><ref>Duckworth, Penelope, ''Mary: The Imagination of Her Heart'' 2004 {{ISBN|1-56101-260-2}} pp. 3–5</ref>


What, us? Are we to worship only Christ? Indeed, shouldn't we also honor the holy mother of Christ? She is the woman who bruised the head of the serpent. Hear us, Mary, for thy Son so honors thee that he can refuse thee nothing. Here [[Bernard of Clairvaux|Bernard]] went too far in his ''Homilies on the Gospel: Missus est Angelus''.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tA9HQwAACAAJ&q=%22Missus+est+Angelus+gabriel%22+bernard |title=Homiliae S. Bernardi super evangelio: "Missus est angelus Gabriel" – saint Bernard de Clairvaux – Google Boeken |access-date=30 September 2013 |last1=Clairvaux |first1=Saint Bernard de |year=1476 |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417211244/https://books.google.com/books?id=tA9HQwAACAAJ&q=%22Missus+est+Angelus+gabriel%22+bernard |url-status=live }}</ref> God has commanded that we should honor the parents; therefore I will call upon Mary. She will intercede for me with the Son, and the Son with the Father, who will listen to the Son. So you have the picture of God as angry and Christ as judge; Mary shows to Christ her breast and Christ shows his wounds to the wrathful Father. That's the kind of thing this comely bride, the wisdom of reason cooks up: Mary is the mother of Christ, surely Christ will listen to her; Christ is a stern judge, therefore I will call upon St. George and St. Christopher. No, we have been by God's command baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, just as the Jews were circumcised.<ref>{{citation |contribution=Sermon on the Second Sunday after Epiphany |orig-year=1546 |series=Luther's Works |volume=51 |title=Sermons I |editor1-first=John W. |editor1-last=Doberstein |editor2-first=Helmut T. |editor2-last=Lehmann |publisher=Fortress Press |year=1959 |isbn=978-0-8006-0351-9 |page=375}}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Dr. Martin Luthers Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe |year=1883 |place=Weimar |volume=51 |page=128}}</ref>}}
The [[Society of Mary (Anglican)|Anglican Society of Mary]] was formed in 1931 and maintains chapters in many countries. The purpose of the society is to foster devotion to Mary among Anglicans.<ref name="Schroedel-2006" /><ref>''Church of England yearbook: Volume 123'' 2006 {{ISBN|0-7151-1020-9}} p. 315</ref> [[High church]] Anglicans espouse doctrines that are closer to Roman Catholics, and retain veneration for Mary, such as [[Christian pilgrimage|Anglican pilgrimages]] to [[Our Lady of Lourdes]], which have taken place since 1963, and [[Christian pilgrimage|pilgrimages]] to [[Our Lady of Walsingham]], which have taken place for hundreds of years.<ref>Perrier, Jacques, ''Lourdes Today and Tomorrow'' 2008 {{ISBN|1565483057}} p. 56</ref>


Certain Lutheran churches such as the [[Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church]] continue to venerate Mary and the saints in the same manner that Roman Catholics do, and hold all Marian dogmas as part of their faith.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://anglolutherancatholic.org/laypeople/more-faq/ |access-date=11 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100523163135/https://anglolutherancatholic.org/laypeople/more-faq/ |title=More FAQ |publisher=The Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church |archive-date=23 May 2010}}</ref>
Historically, there has been enough common ground between Roman Catholics and Anglicans on Marian issues that in 2005, a joint statement called ''Mary: grace and hope in Christ'' was produced through ecumenical meetings of Anglicans and Roman Catholic theologians. This document, informally known as the "Seattle Statement", is not formally endorsed by either the Catholic Church or the Anglican Communion, but is viewed by its authors as the beginning of a joint understanding of Mary.<ref name="Schroedel-2006" /><ref>''Mary: grace and hope in Christ: the Seattle statement of the Anglican-Roman Catholics'' by the Anglican/Roman Catholic International Group 2006 {{ISBN|0-8264-8155-8}} pp. 7–10</ref>


====Methodist====
=====Methodist=====
{{Further|Saints in Methodism#Virgin Mary}}{{anchor|Methodism}}
{{Further|Saints in Methodism#Virgin Mary}}{{anchor|Methodism}}
Methodists do not have any additional teachings on the Virgin Mary except from what is mentioned in Scripture and the ecumenical Creeds. As such, Methodists generally accept the doctrine of the virgin birth, but reject the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1431 |title=What does The United Methodist Church teach about the Immaculate Conception and the Virgin Birth? |publisher=Archives.umc.org |date=6 November 2006 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=29 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130729023105/https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1431 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[John Wesley]], the principal founder of the Methodist movement within the Church of England, believed that Mary "continued a [[perpetual virginity of Mary|pure and unspotted virgin]]", thus upholding the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary.<ref>{{citation|url=https://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/the-letters-of-john-wesley/wesleyrsquos-letters-1749 |publisher=The Wesley Center Online |title=Wesley's Letters |year=1749 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111105150155/https://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/the-letters-of-john-wesley/wesleys-letters-1749/ |archive-date=5 November 2011 }}</ref><ref name="davidmacd.com">{{cite web|url=https://www.davidmacd.com/catholic/mary_perpetual_virgin.htm |title=Mary's Perpetual Virginity |publisher=Davidmacd.com |access-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120825160944/https://www.davidmacd.com/catholic/mary_perpetual_virgin.htm |archive-date=25 August 2012 }}</ref> Contemporary Methodism does hold that Mary was a virgin before, during, and immediately after the birth of Christ.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1430 |title=What does The United Methodist Church teach about the Virgin Mary? |publisher=Archives.umc.org |date=6 November 2006 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=1 July 2012 |archive-url=https://archive.is/20120701112647/https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1430 |url-status=live }}</ref> In addition, some Methodists also hold the doctrine of the [[Assumption of Mary]] as a pious opinion.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://christianityfaq.com/methodists-pray-mary/|title=Theotokos; Mary, Mother of God|last=Stepp|first=Todd|date=23 December 2009|publisher=Wesleyan/Anglican Society|language=en|quote=We Protestants (for the most part) tend to say something to the affect [sic] that, if it is not found in Scripture it is not held to be required as an article of faith. Thus, the assumption of Mary would not be held as an article of faith (i.e., as a required doctrine). However, in as much as the Scripture does not say that Mary was not assumed into heaven, and, in as much as we do have other instances of some sort of "assumption" in Scripture (e.g., Elijah, as mentioned, before), there seems to be nothing that would require that a Protestant Christian could not have a private "opinion" (in the Wesleyan sense of the term) that agrees with Rome or Constantinople (at least regarding Mary's assumption).}}</ref>
Methodists do not have any additional teachings on the Virgin Mary except from what is mentioned in Scripture and the ecumenical Creeds. As such, Methodists generally accept the doctrine of the virgin birth, but reject the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1431 |title=What does The United Methodist Church teach about the Immaculate Conception and the Virgin Birth? |publisher=Archives.umc.org |date=6 November 2006 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=29 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130729023105/https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1431 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[John Wesley]], the principal founder of the Methodist movement within the Church of England, believed that Mary "continued a [[perpetual virginity of Mary|pure and unspotted virgin]]", thus upholding the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary.<ref>{{citation|url=https://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/the-letters-of-john-wesley/wesleyrsquos-letters-1749 |publisher=The Wesley Center Online |title=Wesley's Letters |year=1749 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111105150155/https://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/the-letters-of-john-wesley/wesleys-letters-1749/ |archive-date=5 November 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.davidmacd.com/catholic/mary_perpetual_virgin.htm |title=Mary's Perpetual Virginity |publisher=Davidmacd.com |access-date=30 September 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120825160944/https://www.davidmacd.com/catholic/mary_perpetual_virgin.htm |archive-date=25 August 2012 }}</ref> Contemporary Methodism holds that Mary was a virgin before, during, and immediately after the birth of Christ.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1430 |title=What does The United Methodist Church teach about the Virgin Mary? |publisher=Archives.umc.org |date=6 November 2006 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=1 July 2012 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120701112647/https://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?ptid=1&mid=1430 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://christianity.about.com/od/denominationscomparison/ss/comparebeliefs1_9.htm |title=Comparing Christian Denominations – Beliefs: Nature of Mary |publisher=Christianity.about.com |date=30 July 2013 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=4 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150404182522/https://christianity.about.com/od/denominationscomparison/ss/comparebeliefs1_9.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> In addition, some Methodists also hold the doctrine of the [[Assumption of Mary]] as a pious opinion.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://christianityfaq.com/methodists-pray-mary/|title=Theotokos; Mary, Mother of God|last=Stepp|first=Todd|date=23 December 2009|publisher=Wesleyan/Anglican Society|language=en|quote=We Protestants (for the most part) tend to say something to the affect [sic] that, if it is not found in Scripture it is not held to be required as an article of faith. Thus, the assumption of Mary would not be held as an article of faith (i.e., as a required doctrine). However, in as much as the Scripture does not say that Mary was not assumed into heaven, and, in as much as we do have other instances of some sort of "assumption" in Scripture (e.g., Elijah, as mentioned, before), there seems to be nothing that would require that a Protestant Christian could not have a private "opinion" (in the Wesleyan sense of the term) that agrees with Rome or Constantinople (at least regarding Mary's assumption).}}</ref>


====Nontrinitarian====
====Nontrinitarian====
[[Nontrinitarians]], such as [[Unitarianism|Unitarians]], [[Christadelphians]], [[Jehovah's Witnesses]], and [[Latter Day Saint movement|Latter Day Saints]]<ref>Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America 2006 p. 73 Eugene V. Gallagher, W. Michael Ashcraft: "Jehovah's Witnesses pray to God in the name of Jesus, but insist that the Bible never identifies Christ as an eternal […] Jehovah God caused an ovum, or egg cell, in Mary's womb to become fertile, accomplishing this by the transferral of "</ref> also acknowledge Mary as the biological mother of Jesus Christ, but most reject any immaculate conception and do not recognize Marian titles such as "Mother of God". The [[Latter Day Saint views on Mary|Latter Day Saint movement's view]] affirms the virgin birth of Jesus<ref>{{citation|last=Colton|first=Eleanor|title=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|year=1992|volume=4|page=1510|contribution=Virgin Birth|contribution-url=https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/4311|location=New York1|publisher=Macmillan Publishing Co.|title-link=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|access-date=14 September 2015|archive-date=2 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170702201133/https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/4311|url-status=live}}</ref> and Christ's divinity, but only as a separate being than [[God the Father]]. The [[Book of Mormon]] refers to Mary by name in prophecies and describes her as "most beautiful and fair above all other virgins"<ref>{{lds|1 Nephi|1-ne|11|13|20}}</ref> and as a "precious and chosen vessel."<ref>{{lds|Alma|alma|7|10}}</ref><ref name="EOM">{{citation|last=Fronk|first=Camille|title=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|year=1992|volume=2|pages=863–864|contribution=Mary, Mother of Jesus|contribution-url=https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/3906|location=New York|publisher=Macmillan Publishing Co.|title-link=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|access-date=10 June 2013|archive-date=2 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170702194002/https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/3906|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[Nontrinitarians]], such as [[Unitarianism|Unitarians]], [[Christadelphians]], [[Jehovah's Witnesses]], and [[Latter Day Saint movement|Latter Day Saints]]<ref>Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America 2006 p. 73 Eugene V. Gallagher, W. Michael Ashcraft: "Jehovah's Witnesses pray to God in the name of Jesus, but insist that the Bible never identifies Christ as an eternal ... Jehovah God caused an ovum, or egg cell, in Mary's womb to become fertile, accomplishing this by the transferral of."</ref> also acknowledge Mary as the biological mother of Jesus Christ, but most reject any immaculate conception and do not recognize Marian titles such as "Mother of God". The [[Latter Day Saint views on Mary|Latter Day Saint movement's view]] affirms the virgin birth of Jesus<ref>{{citation|last=Colton|first=Eleanor|title=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|year=1992|volume=4|page=1510|contribution=Virgin Birth|contribution-url=https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/4311|location=New York1|publisher=Macmillan Publishing Co.|title-link=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|access-date=14 September 2015|archive-date=2 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170702201133/https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/4311|url-status=live}}</ref> and Christ's divinity, but only as a separate being than [[God the Father]]. The [[Book of Mormon]] refers to Mary by name in prophecies and describes her as "most beautiful and fair above all other virgins"<ref>{{lds|1 Nephi|1-ne|11|13|20}}</ref> and as a "precious and chosen vessel."<ref>{{lds|Alma|alma|7|10}}</ref><ref>{{citation|last=Fronk|first=Camille|title=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|year=1992|volume=2|pages=863–864|contribution=Mary, Mother of Jesus|contribution-url=https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/3906|location=New York|publisher=Macmillan Publishing Co.|title-link=Encyclopedia of Mormonism|access-date=10 June 2013|archive-date=2 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170702194002/https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/EoM/id/3906|url-status=live}}</ref>


In nontrinitarian groups that are also [[Christian mortalism|Christian mortalists]], Mary is not seen as an intercessor between humankind and Jesus, whom mortalists would consider "asleep", awaiting resurrection.<ref>Christian mortalism from Tyndale to Milton Norman T. Burns – 1972</ref>
In nontrinitarian groups that are also [[Christian mortalism|Christian mortalists]], Mary is not seen as an intercessor between humankind and Jesus, whom mortalists would consider "asleep", awaiting resurrection.<ref>Christian mortalism from Tyndale to Milton Norman T. Burns – 1972</ref>


===Jewish===
===Jewish===
The issue of the parentage of [[Jesus in the Talmud]] also affects Jewish views of Mary. However, the Talmud does not mention Mary by name, and is considerate rather than only polemic.<ref>The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman culture: Volume 3 – p. 369 Peter Schäfer, [[Catherine Hezser]] – 2002 The Mother of the Messiah in the Talmud Yerushalmi and [[Sefer Zerubbabel]] by Martha Himmelfarb "Through the centuries the Virgin Mary has played a central role in Christian piety. Unlike so many aspects of Christianity, veneration of the…"</ref><ref>Peter Schäfer, ''Mirror of His beauty: feminine images of God from the Bible to the early Kabbalah''. 2002, p. 233: "On the one hand, it mockingly disapproves of the idea of the mother of God; on the other hand, it treats Mary considerately and by no means only polemically. The talmudic and post-talmudic discussions about the Virgin Mary are classic…"</ref> The story about [[Panthera (Jesus's father)|Panthera]] is also found in the {{transliteration|he|[[Toledot Yeshu]]}}, the literary origins of which can not be traced with any certainty, and given that it is unlikely to go before the 4th century, the time is too late to include authentic remembrances of Jesus.<ref>Van Voorst, Robert E (2000). ''Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence'' WmB Eerdmans Publishing. {{ISBN|0-8028-4368-9}} pp. 122, 127</ref> ''The Blackwell Companion to Jesus'' states that the {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} has no historical facts and was perhaps created as a tool for warding off conversions to Christianity.<ref>Michael J. Cook ''Jewish Perspectives on Jesus'' Chapter 14 in "The Blackwell Companion to Jesus" edited by Delbert Burkett 2011 {{ISBN|978-1-4443-2794-6}}</ref> The tales from the {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} did impart a negative picture of Mary to ordinary Jewish readers.<ref name="Remensnyder2014" /> The circulation of the {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} was widespread among European and Middle Eastern Jewish communities since the 9th century.<ref name="Voorst2000">{{cite book|author=Robert Van Voorst|title=Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lwzliMSRGGkC&pg=PA122|date=2000|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|isbn=978-0-8028-4368-5|pages=122–|access-date=24 February 2018|archive-date=18 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818200857/https://books.google.com/books?id=lwzliMSRGGkC&pg=PA122|url-status=live}}</ref> The name Panthera may be a distortion of the term {{transliteration|grc|parthenos}} ("virgin") and [[Raymond E. Brown]] considers the story of Panthera a fanciful explanation of the birth of Jesus that includes very little historical evidence.<ref>''Mary in the New Testament'' by [[Raymond Edward Brown]], et al. 1978 {{ISBN|0-8091-2168-9}} p. 262</ref> [[Robert Van Voorst]] states that because {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} is a medieval document with its lack of a fixed form and orientation towards a popular audience, it is "most unlikely" to have reliable historical information.<ref>Van Voorst, Robert E (2000). ''Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence'' WmB Eerdmans Publishing. {{ISBN|0-8028-4368-9}} p. 128</ref> Stacks of the copies of the Talmud were burnt upon a court order after the [[Disputation of Paris|1240 Disputation]] for allegedly containing material defaming the character of Mary.<ref name="Remensnyder2014">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D4EfAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA138|title=La Conquistadora: The Virgin Mary at War and Peace in the Old and New Worlds|author=Amy G. Remensnyder|date=2014|publisher=OUP US|isbn=978-0-19-989300-3|pages=138–|access-date=3 March 2018|archive-date=17 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417211601/https://books.google.com/books?id=D4EfAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA138|url-status=live}}</ref>
The issue of the parentage of [[Jesus in the Talmud]] also affects Jewish views of Mary. However, the Talmud does not mention Mary by name, and is considerate rather than only polemic.<ref>The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman culture: Volume 3 – p. 369 [[Peter Schäfer]], [[Catherine Hezser]] – 2002 The Mother of the Messiah in the Talmud Yerushalmi and [[Sefer Zerubbabel]] by [[Martha Himmelfarb]] "Through the centuries the Virgin Mary has played a central role in Christian piety. Unlike so many aspects of Christianity, veneration of the…"</ref><ref>Peter Schäfer, ''Mirror of His beauty: feminine images of God from the Bible to the early Kabbalah''. 2002, p. 233: "On the one hand, it mockingly disapproves of the idea of the mother of God; on the other hand, it treats Mary considerately and by no means only polemically. The talmudic and post-talmudic discussions about the Virgin Mary are classic…"</ref> The story about [[Panthera (Jesus's father)|Panthera]] is also found in the {{transliteration|he|[[Toledot Yeshu]]}}, the literary origins of which can not be traced with any certainty, and given that it is unlikely to go before the 4th century, the time is too late to include authentic remembrances of Jesus.<ref>Van Voorst, Robert E (2000). ''Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence'' WmB Eerdmans Publishing. {{ISBN|0-8028-4368-9}} pp. 122, 127</ref> ''The Blackwell Companion to Jesus'' states that the {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} has no historical facts and was perhaps created as a tool for warding off conversions to Christianity.<ref>Michael J. Cook ''Jewish Perspectives on Jesus'' Chapter 14 in "The Blackwell Companion to Jesus" edited by Delbert Burkett 2011 {{ISBN|978-1-4443-2794-6}}</ref> The tales from the {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} did impart a negative picture of Mary to ordinary Jewish readers.<ref name="Remensnyder-2014" /> The circulation of the {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} was widespread among European and Middle Eastern Jewish communities since the 9th century.<ref>{{cite book|author=Robert Van Voorst|title=Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lwzliMSRGGkC&pg=PA122|date=2000|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|isbn=978-0-8028-4368-5|pages=122–|access-date=24 February 2018|archive-date=18 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818200857/https://books.google.com/books?id=lwzliMSRGGkC&pg=PA122|url-status=live}}</ref> The name Panthera may be a distortion of the term {{transliteration|grc|parthenos}} ("virgin") and [[Raymond E. Brown]] considers the story of Panthera a fanciful explanation of the birth of Jesus that includes very little historical evidence.<ref>''Mary in the New Testament'' by [[Raymond Edward Brown]], et al. 1978 {{ISBN|0-8091-2168-9}} p. 262</ref> [[Robert Van Voorst]] states that because {{transliteration|he|Toledot Yeshu}} is a medieval document with its lack of a fixed form and orientation towards a popular audience, it is "most unlikely" to have reliable historical information.<ref>Van Voorst, Robert E. (2000). ''Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence,'' WmB Eerdmans Publishing. {{ISBN|0-8028-4368-9}}, p. 128.</ref> Stacks of the copies of the Talmud were burnt upon a court order after the [[Disputation of Paris|1240 Disputation]] for allegedly containing material defaming the character of Mary.<ref name="Remensnyder-2014">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D4EfAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA138|title=La Conquistadora: The Virgin Mary at War and Peace in the Old and New Worlds|author=Amy G. Remensnyder|date=2014|publisher=OUP US|isbn=978-0-19-989300-3|pages=138–|access-date=3 March 2018|archive-date=17 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417211601/https://books.google.com/books?id=D4EfAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA138|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Islamic===
===Islamic===
{{Main|Mary in Islam}}
{{Main|Mary in Islam}}
[[File:Virgin Mary and Jesus (old Persian miniature).jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|[[Persian miniature]] of Mary and Jesus]]
 
[[File:Maryam and Isa.jpg|thumb|[[Persian miniature]] of Mary and Jesus]]
The Virgin Mary holds a singularly exalted place in [[Islam]], and she is considered by the [[Quran]] to have been the greatest woman in the history of humankind. The Islamic scripture recounts the Divine Promise given to Mary as being: ""O Mary! Surely Allah has selected you, purified you, and chosen you over all women of the world" ({{qref|3|42|pl=y}}).
The Virgin Mary holds a singularly exalted place in [[Islam]], and she is considered by the [[Quran]] to have been the greatest woman in the history of humankind. The Islamic scripture recounts the Divine Promise given to Mary as being: ""O Mary! Surely Allah has selected you, purified you, and chosen you over all women of the world" ({{qref|3|42|pl=y}}).


Mary is often referred to by Muslims by the honorific title {{transliteration|ar|Sayedetina}} ("Our Lady"). She is mentioned in the Quran as the daughter of Imran.<ref name="Glasse">''The new encyclopedia of Islam'' by Cyril Glassé, Huston Smith 2003 {{ISBN|0-7591-0190-6}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=focLrox-frUC&q=maryam+%22mother+of+Jesus%22&pg=PA296 296 sayyidatuna] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705123338/https://books.google.com/books?id=focLrox-frUC&pg=PA296#v=onepage&q=maryam%20%22mother%20of%20Jesus%22&f=false |date=5 July 2021 }}</ref>
Mary is often referred to by Muslims by the honorific title {{transliteration|ar|Sayedetina}} ("Our Lady"). She is mentioned in the Quran as the daughter of Imran.<ref name="Glasse-2003">''The new encyclopedia of Islam'' by Cyril Glassé, Huston Smith 2003 {{ISBN|0-7591-0190-6}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=focLrox-frUC&q=maryam+%22mother+of+Jesus%22&pg=PA296 296 sayyidatuna] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705123338/https://books.google.com/books?id=focLrox-frUC&pg=PA296#v=onepage&q=maryam%20%22mother%20of%20Jesus%22&f=false |date=5 July 2021 }}</ref>


Moreover, Mary is the only woman named in the Quran and she is mentioned or referred to in the scripture a total of 50 times.{{efn|See the following verses: {{qref|5|114}}, {{qref|5|116}}, {{qref|7|158}}, {{qref|9|31}}, {{qref|17|57}}, {{qref|17|104}}, {{qref|18|102}}, {{qref|19|16}}, {{qref|19|17}}, {{qref|19|18}}, {{qref|19|20}}, {{qref|19|22}}, {{qref|19|24}}, {{qref|19|27}}, {{qref|19|28}}, {{qref|19|29}}, {{qref|19|34}}, {{qref|21|26}}, {{qref|21|91}}, {{qref|21|101}}, {{qref|23|50}}, {{qref|25|17}}, {{qref|33|7}}, {{qref|39|45}}, {{qref|43|57}}, {{qref|43|61}}, {{qref|57|27}}, {{qref|61|6}}, {{qref|61|14}}, {{qref|66|12}}.}} Mary holds a singularly distinguished and honored position among [[Female figures in the Quran|women in the Quran]]. A {{transliteration|ar|[[sura]]}} (chapter) in the Quran is titled "[[Maryam (sura)|Maryam]]" (Mary), the only {{transliteration|ar|sura}} in the Quran named after a woman, in which the story of Mary (Maryam) and Jesus (Isa) is recounted according to the view of [[Jesus in Islam]].<ref name="Jestice" />
Moreover, Mary is the only woman named in the Quran and she is mentioned or referred to in the scripture a total of 50 times.{{efn|See the following verses: {{qref|5|114}}, {{qref|5|116}}, {{qref|7|158}}, {{qref|9|31}}, {{qref|17|57}}, {{qref|17|104}}, {{qref|18|102}}, {{qref|19|16}}, {{qref|19|17}}, {{qref|19|18}}, {{qref|19|20}}, {{qref|19|22}}, {{qref|19|24}}, {{qref|19|27}}, {{qref|19|28}}, {{qref|19|29}}, {{qref|19|34}}, {{qref|21|26}}, {{qref|21|91}}, {{qref|21|101}}, {{qref|23|50}}, {{qref|25|17}}, {{qref|33|7}}, {{qref|39|45}}, {{qref|43|57}}, {{qref|43|61}}, {{qref|57|27}}, {{qref|61|6}}, {{qref|61|14}}, {{qref|66|12}}.}} Mary holds a singularly distinguished and honored position among [[Female figures in the Quran|women in the Quran]]. A {{transliteration|ar|[[sura]]}} (chapter) in the Quran is titled "[[Maryam (sura)|Maryam]]" (Mary), the only {{transliteration|ar|sura}} in the Quran named after a woman, in which the story of Mary (Maryam) and Jesus (Isa) is recounted according to the view of [[Jesus in Islam]].<ref name="Jestice-2004" />


====Birth====
====Birth====
In a narration of [[hadith]] from Imam [[Ja'far al-Sadiq]], he mentions that [[Allah]] revealed to [[Joachim#In Islamic tradition|Imran]], "I will grant you a boy, blessed, one who will cure the blind and the leper and one who will raise the dead by My permission. And I will send him as an apostle to the Children of Israel." Then Imran related the story to his wife, [[Anne in Islam|Hannah]], the mother of Mary. When she became pregnant, she conceived it was a boy, but when she gave birth to a girl, she stated "Oh my Lord! Verily I have delivered a female, and the male is not like the female, for a girl will not be a prophet," to which [[Allah]] replies in the Quran, "Allah knows better what has been delivered" (3:36). When Allah bestowed Jesus to Mary, he fulfilled his promise to Imran.<ref name = Qaim2007>{{cite book|last1=Qa'im|first1=Mahdi Muntazir|title=Jesus Through the Qur'an and Shi'ite Narrations|date=2007|publisher=Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an|location=Queens, New York|isbn=978-1879402140|page=16|edition=bilingual}}</ref>
In a narration of [[hadith]] from Imam [[Ja'far al-Sadiq]], he mentions that [[Allah]] revealed to [[Joachim#In Islamic tradition|Imran]], "I will grant you a boy, blessed, one who will cure the blind and the leper and one who will raise the dead by My permission. And I will send him as an apostle to the Children of Israel." Then Imran related the story to his wife, [[Anne in Islam|Hannah]], the mother of Mary. When she became pregnant, she conceived it was a boy, but when she gave birth to a girl, she stated "Oh my Lord! Verily I have delivered a female, and the male is not like the female, for a girl will not be a prophet," to which [[Allah]] replies in the Quran, "Allah knows better what has been delivered" (3:36). When Allah bestowed Jesus to Mary, he fulfilled his promise to Imran.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Qa'im|first1=Mahdi Muntazir|title=Jesus Through the Qur'an and Shi'ite Narrations|date=2007|publisher=Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an|location=Queens, New York|isbn=978-1879402140|page=16|edition=bilingual}}</ref>


====Motherhood====
====Motherhood====
[[File:Maryam.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Mary shaking the palm tree for dates]]
[[File:Maryamat the palm tree with baby Isa.jpg|thumb|Islamic [[Persian miniature|miniature]] of Maryam in labor shaking a date palm, with Isa and hidden voice below]]
Mary was declared (uniquely along with Jesus) to be a "Sign of God" to humanity;<ref>{{qref|23|50|b=y|t=si}}</ref> as one who "guarded her chastity";<ref name="qref|66|12|b=y"/> an "obedient one";<ref name="qref|66|12|b=y"/> and dedicated by her mother to Allah whilst still in the womb;<ref>{{qref|3|36|b=y}}</ref> uniquely (amongst women) "Accepted into service by God";<ref name="qref|3|37|b=y">{{qref|3|37|b=y}}</ref> cared for by (one of the prophets as per Islam) [[Islamic view of Zechariah|Zakariya]] (Zacharias);<ref name="qref|3|37|b=y"/> that in her childhood she resided in the Temple and uniquely had access to Al-[[Mihrab]] (understood to be the [[Holy of Holies]]), and was provided with heavenly "provisions" by God.<ref name="qref|3|37|b=y"/><ref name="Glasse" />
Mary was declared (uniquely along with Jesus) to be a "Sign of God" to humanity;<ref>{{qref|23|50|b=y|t=si}}</ref> as one who "guarded her chastity";<ref name="qref|66|12|b=y"/> an "obedient one";<ref name="qref|66|12|b=y"/> and dedicated by her mother to Allah whilst still in the womb;<ref name="qref|3|36|b=y"/> uniquely (amongst women) "Accepted into service by God";<ref name="qref|3|37|b=y">{{qref|3|37|b=y}}</ref> cared for by (one of the prophets according to Islam) [[Islamic view of Zechariah|Zakariya]] (Zacharias);<ref name="qref|3|37|b=y"/> that in her childhood she resided in the Temple and uniquely had access to Al-[[Mihrab]] (understood to be the [[Holy of Holies]]), and was provided with heavenly "provisions" by God.<ref name="qref|3|37|b=y"/><ref name="Glasse-2003" />


Mary is also called a "Chosen One";<ref name="qref|3|42|b=y">{{qref|3|42|b=y|t=si}}</ref> a "Purified One";<ref name="qref|3|42|b=y"/> a "Truthful one";<ref>{{qref|5|75|b=y}}</ref> her child conceived through "a Word from God";<ref>{{qref|3|45|b=y}}</ref> and "chosen you above the women of the worlds(the material and heavenly worlds)".<ref name="qref|3|42|b=y"/>
Mary is also called a "Chosen One";<ref name="qref|3|42|b=y">{{qref|3|42|b=y|t=si}}</ref> a "Purified One";<ref name="qref|3|42|b=y"/> a "Truthful one";<ref>{{qref|5|75|b=y}}</ref> her child conceived through "a Word from God";<ref>{{qref|3|45|b=y}}</ref> and "chosen you above the women of the worlds(the material and heavenly worlds)".<ref name="qref|3|42|b=y"/>
Line 296: Line 304:
The Quran relates detailed narrative accounts of Maryam (Mary) in two places, {{qref|3|35-47|pl=y}} and {{qref|19|16-34|pl=y}}. These state beliefs in both the Immaculate Conception of Mary and the virgin birth of Jesus.<ref>Jomier, Jacques. ''The Bible and the Qur'an''. 2002 {{ISBN|0-89870-928-8}} p. 133</ref><ref>Nazir-Ali, Michael. ''Islam, a Christian perspective''. 1984 {{ISBN|0-664-24527-7}} p. 110</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/marykran.htm |title=The Virgin Mary In The Koran |website=EWTN.com |date=13 April 1978 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=6 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160806044024/https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/marykran.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> The account given in {{qref|19|c=y|pl=y}} is nearly identical with that in the Gospel according to [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]], and both of these (Luke, Sura 19) begin with an account of the visitation of an angel upon Zakariya (Zecharias) and "Good News of the birth of Yahya (John)", followed by the account of the annunciation. It mentions how Mary was informed by an angel that she would become the mother of Jesus through the actions of God alone.<ref>Jackson, Montell. ''Islam Revealed''. 2003 {{ISBN|1-59160-869-4}} p. 73</ref>
The Quran relates detailed narrative accounts of Maryam (Mary) in two places, {{qref|3|35-47|pl=y}} and {{qref|19|16-34|pl=y}}. These state beliefs in both the Immaculate Conception of Mary and the virgin birth of Jesus.<ref>Jomier, Jacques. ''The Bible and the Qur'an''. 2002 {{ISBN|0-89870-928-8}} p. 133</ref><ref>Nazir-Ali, Michael. ''Islam, a Christian perspective''. 1984 {{ISBN|0-664-24527-7}} p. 110</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/marykran.htm |title=The Virgin Mary In The Koran |website=EWTN.com |date=13 April 1978 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=6 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160806044024/https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/marykran.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> The account given in {{qref|19|c=y|pl=y}} is nearly identical with that in the Gospel according to [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]], and both of these (Luke, Sura 19) begin with an account of the visitation of an angel upon Zakariya (Zecharias) and "Good News of the birth of Yahya (John)", followed by the account of the annunciation. It mentions how Mary was informed by an angel that she would become the mother of Jesus through the actions of God alone.<ref>Jackson, Montell. ''Islam Revealed''. 2003 {{ISBN|1-59160-869-4}} p. 73</ref>


In the Islamic tradition, Mary and Jesus were the only children who could not be touched by Satan at the moment of their birth, for God imposed a veil between them and Satan.<ref>{{Qref|3|36|b=y}}</ref><ref>Rodwell, J. M. ''The Koran''. 2009 {{ISBN|0-559-13127-5}} p. 505</ref> According to the author [[Shabbir Akhtar]], the Islamic perspective on Mary's Immaculate Conception is compatible with the Catholic doctrine of the same topic.  
In the Islamic tradition, Mary and Jesus were the only children who could not be touched by Satan at the moment of their birth, for God imposed a veil between them and Satan.<ref>{{Qref|3|36|b=y}}</ref><ref>Rodwell, J. M. ''The Koran''. 2009, {{ISBN|0-559-13127-5}}, p. 505.</ref> According to the author [[Shabbir Akhtar]], the Islamic perspective on Mary's Immaculate Conception is compatible with the Catholic doctrine of the same topic.  
{{bq|"O People of the Book! Do not go to extremes regarding your faith; say nothing about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger of Allah and the fulfilment of His Word through Mary and a spirit ˹created by a command˺ from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers and do not say, “Trinity.Stop!—for your own good. Allah is only One God. Glory be to Him! He is far above having a son! To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And Allah is sufficient as a Trustee of Affairs.|{{qref|4|171|c=y}}<ref>Akhtar, Shabbir.''The Quran and the secular mind: a philosophy of Islam''. 2007 p. 352</ref><ref>Glassé, Cyril, Huston Smith. ''The new encyclopedia of Islam''. 2003 {{ISBN|0-7591-0190-6}} p. 240</ref>}}
{{blockquote|"O [[People of the Book]]! Do not go to extremes regarding your faith; say nothing about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger of Allah and the fulfilment of His Word through Mary and a spirit ˹created by a command˺ from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers and do not say, "Trinity." Stop!—for your own good. Allah is only One God. Glory be to Him! He is far above having a son! To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And Allah is sufficient as a Trustee of Affairs.|{{qref|4|171|c=y}}<ref>Akhtar, Shabbir.''The Quran and the secular mind: a philosophy of Islam''. 2007 p. 352</ref><ref>Glassé, Cyril, Huston Smith. ''The new encyclopedia of Islam''. 2003 {{ISBN|0-7591-0190-6}} p. 240</ref>}}


The Quran says that Jesus was the result of a virgin birth. The most detailed account of the annunciation and birth of Jesus is provided in Suras 3 and 19 of the Quran, where it is written that God sent an angel to announce that she could shortly expect to bear a son, despite being a virgin.<ref>Sarker, Abraham.''Understand My Muslim People''. 2004 {{ISBN|1-59498-002-0}} p. 260 [https://books.google.com/books?id=xkQfnwEACAAJ no preview] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417205618/https://books.google.com/books?id=xkQfnwEACAAJ&dq=isbn:1594980020 |date=17 April 2021 }}</ref>
The Quran says that Jesus was the result of a virgin birth. The most detailed account of the annunciation and birth of Jesus is provided in Suras 3 and 19 of the Quran, where it is written that God sent an angel to announce that she could shortly expect to bear a son, despite being a virgin.<ref>Sarker, Abraham.''Understand My Muslim People''. 2004 {{ISBN|1-59498-002-0}} p. 260 [https://books.google.com/books?id=xkQfnwEACAAJ no preview] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417205618/https://books.google.com/books?id=xkQfnwEACAAJ&dq=isbn:1594980020 |date=17 April 2021 }}</ref>
===Druze Faith===
[[File:The icon of Saydet el Talleh.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|The icon of [[Church of Saidet et Tallé|Saidet et Tallé]], also known as "the Virgin of the Druze", is venerated by both the [[Druze]] and [[Christian]] communities in Lebanon.<ref name="Bowman-2012">{{cite book|title=Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations Around Holy Places|first=Glenn|last= Bowman|year=2012|isbn=9780857454867|page=17|publisher=Berghahn Books}}</ref>]]
The [[Druze faith]] holds the Virgin Mary, known as ''Sayyida Maryam'', in high regard.<ref name="Makdisi-2000">{{cite book|title=The Culture of Sectarianism: Community, History, and Violence in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Lebanon|first=Ussama|last=Makdisi|authorlink=Ussama Makdisi|year=2000|isbn=978-0520218468|page =35|publisher=University of California Press|quote=}}</ref> Although the [[Druze religion]] is distinct from mainstream [[Islam]] and [[Christianity]], it incorporates elements from both and honors many of their figures, including the Virgin Mary.<ref name="Makdisi-2000" /> The Druze revere Mary as a holy and pure figure, embodying virtue and piety.<ref name="Dana-2008">{{cite book|title=The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status |first=Nissim |last=Dana|year=2008 |isbn=978-1-903900-36-9 |page=47 |publisher=Michigan University press}}</ref><ref name="Makdisi-2000" /> She is respected not only for her role as the mother of Messiah Jesus but also for her spiritual purity and dedication to God.<ref name="Dana-2008"/><ref name="Makdisi-2000" /> In regions where [[Christianity and Druze|Druze and Christians coexist]], such as parts of [[Lebanon]], [[Syria]] and [[Israel]], the [[Marian devotions|veneration of Mary]] often reflects a blend of traditions.<ref name="Munro-2019">{{cite book|last1=Munro|first1=Dane|last2=Haddad|first2=Nour Fara|title=Peace Journeys: A New Direction in Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Research|year=2019|publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing|location=Cambridge|isbn=9781527543133|pages=7}}</ref> Shared pilgrimage sites and mutual respect for places like the [[Church of Saidet et Tallé]] in [[Deir el Qamar]],<ref>{{cite book|title=Twilight of the Saints: Everyday Religion in Ottoman Syria and Palestine|last=Grehan|first=James|year=2016|isbn=9780190619145|page=178|publisher=Oxford University Press|quote=On Mt. Lebanon, so many Druze flocked to the shrine of the Virgin of the Mountain, located in the Shihabi administrative seat of Dayr al-Qamr, that it became known as the "Virgin of the Druze".}}</ref> the [[Our Lady of Lebanon]] shrine in [[Harissa-Daraoun|Harrisa]], the [[Our Lady of Saidnaya Monastery]] in [[Saidnaya]], and the [[Stella Maris Monastery]] in [[Haifa]] exemplify this.<ref name="Munro-2019"/>
Historical records and writings by authors like Pierre-Marie Martin and Glenn Bowman show that Druze leaders and community members have historically shown deep reverence for [[Shrines to the Virgin Mary|Marian sites]].<ref name="Bowman-2012" /> They often sought her intercession before battles or during times of need, demonstrating a cultural and spiritual integration of Marian veneration into their religious practices.<ref name="Bowman-2012" />


===Bahá'í Faith===
===Bahá'í Faith===
Line 305: Line 319:


===Biblical scholars===
===Biblical scholars===
The statement found in [[Matthew 1:25]] that Joseph did not have sexual relations with Mary before she gave birth to Jesus has been debated among scholars, with some saying that she did not remain a virgin and some saying that she was a perpetual virgin.<ref>{{cite book|last=Coogan|first=Michael|title=God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says|url=https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog|url-access=registration|quote=god and sex.|access-date=5 May 2011|edition=1st|date=October 2010|publisher=Twelve. Hachette Book Group|location=New York, Boston|isbn=978-0-446-54525-9|page=[https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog/page/39 39]}}</ref> Other scholars contend that the Greek word {{transliteration|grc|heos}} ("until") denotes a state up to a point, but does not mean that the state ended after that point, and that Matthew 1:25 does not confirm or deny the virginity of Mary after the birth of Jesus.<ref>McNally, Terrence, ''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} p. 95</ref><ref>''Cradle of redeeming love'' by John Saward 2002 Ignatius Press {{ISBN|0-89870-886-9}} p. 17</ref><ref>''Mary in the New Testament'' by Raymond Edward Brown 1978 {{ISBN|0-8091-2168-9}} p. 86</ref> According to Biblical scholar [[Bart Ehrman]], the Hebrew word {{transliteration|he|[[almah]]}}, meaning young woman of childbearing age, was translated into Greek as {{transliteration|grc|parthenos}}, which often, though not always, refers to a young woman who has never had sex. In Isaiah 7:14, it is commonly believed by Christians to be the prophecy of the Virgin Mary referred to in Matthew 1:23.<ref>Ehrman, Bart ''Did Jesus Exist'' p. 294</ref> While Matthew and Luke give differing versions of the virgin birth, John quotes the uninitiated Philip and the disbelieving Jews gathered at Galilee referring to Joseph as Jesus' father.<ref>{{bibleverse|John|1:45|NIV}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|John|6:42|NIV}}</ref><ref name="Ehrman2008">{{cite book|last=Ehrman|first=Bart D.|author-link=Bart D. Ehrman|title=Whose Word is It?: The Story Behind who Changed the New Testament and why|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lcrUAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA158|year=2008|publisher=A&C Black|isbn=978-1-84706-314-4|pages=158–|access-date=28 November 2015|archive-date=17 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210817223649/https://books.google.com/books?id=lcrUAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA158|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Ehrman1999">{{cite book|last=Ehrman|first=Bart D.|author-link=Bart D. Ehrman|title=Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium|url=https://archive.org/details/jesusapocalyptic00ehrm|url-access=registration|date=1999|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-983943-8|pages=[https://archive.org/details/jesusapocalyptic00ehrm/page/96 96]–}}</ref>
The statement found in [[Matthew 1:25]] that [[Saint Joseph|Joseph]] did not have sexual relations with Mary before she gave birth to Jesus has been debated among scholars, with some saying that she did not remain a virgin and some saying that she was a perpetual virgin.<ref>{{cite book|last=Coogan|first=Michael|title=God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says|url=https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog|url-access=registration|quote=god and sex.|access-date=5 May 2011|edition=1st|date=October 2010|publisher=Twelve. Hachette Book Group|location=New York, Boston|isbn=978-0-446-54525-9|page=[https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog/page/39 39]}}</ref> Other scholars contend that the Greek word {{transliteration|grc|heos}} ("until") denotes a state up to a point, but does not mean that the state ended after that point, and that Matthew 1:25 does not confirm or deny the virginity of Mary after the birth of Jesus.<ref>McNally, Terrence, ''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} p. 95</ref><ref>''Cradle of redeeming love'' by John Saward 2002 Ignatius Press {{ISBN|0-89870-886-9}} p. 17</ref><ref>''Mary in the New Testament'' by Raymond Edward Brown 1978 {{ISBN|0-8091-2168-9}} p. 86</ref> According to Biblical scholar [[Bart Ehrman]], the Hebrew word {{transliteration|he|[[almah]]}}, meaning young woman of childbearing age, was translated into Greek as {{transliteration|grc|parthenos}}, which often, though not always, refers to a young woman who has never had sexual intercourse. In Isaiah 7:14, it is commonly believed by Christians to be the prophecy of the Virgin Mary referred to in Matthew 1:23.<ref>Ehrman, Bart ''Did Jesus Exist'' p. 294</ref> While Matthew and Luke give differing versions of the virgin birth, John quotes the uninitiated Philip and the disbelieving Jews gathered at Galilee referring to Joseph as Jesus' father.<ref>{{bibleverse|John|1:45|NIV}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|John|6:42|NIV}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Ehrman|first=Bart D.|author-link=Bart D. Ehrman|title=Whose Word is It?: The Story Behind who Changed the New Testament and why|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lcrUAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA158|year=2008|publisher=A&C Black|isbn=978-1-84706-314-4|pages=158–|access-date=28 November 2015|archive-date=17 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210817223649/https://books.google.com/books?id=lcrUAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA158|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Ehrman|first=Bart D.|author-link=Bart D. Ehrman|title=Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium|url=https://archive.org/details/jesusapocalyptic00ehrm|url-access=registration|date=1999|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-983943-8|pages=[https://archive.org/details/jesusapocalyptic00ehrm/page/96 96]–}}</ref>


Other biblical verses have also been debated; for example, the reference made by Paul the Apostle that Jesus was made "of the seed of David according to the flesh" (Romans 1:3)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Romans|1:3}}</ref> meaning that he was a descendant of David through Joseph.<ref>{{cite book|last=Coogan|first=Michael|title=God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says|url=https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog|url-access=registration|access-date=5 May 2011|date=2010|publisher=Twelve. Hachette Book Group|location=New York, Boston|isbn=978-0-446-54525-9|page=[https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog/page/38 38]}}</ref>
Other biblical verses have also been debated; for example, the reference made by Paul the Apostle that Jesus was made "of the seed of David according to the flesh" (Romans 1:3)<ref>{{Bibleverse|Romans|1:3}}</ref> meaning that he was a descendant of David through Joseph.<ref>{{cite book|last=Coogan|first=Michael|title=God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says|url=https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog|url-access=registration|access-date=5 May 2011|date=2010|publisher=Twelve. Hachette Book Group|location=New York, Boston|isbn=978-0-446-54525-9|page=[https://archive.org/details/godsexwhatbi00coog/page/38 38]}}</ref>


===Pre-Christian Rome===
===Pre-Christian Rome===
From the early stages of Christianity, belief in the virginity of Mary and the virgin conception of Jesus, as stated in the gospels, holy and supernatural, was used by detractors, both political and religious, as a topic for discussions, debates, and writings, specifically aimed to challenge the divinity of Jesus and thus Christians and Christianity alike.<ref>Bennett, Clinton, ''In search of Jesus'' 2001 {{ISBN|0-8264-4916-6}} pp. 165–170</ref> In the 2nd century, as part of his [[anti-Christian]] polemic ''[[The True Word]]'', the pagan philosopher [[Celsus]] contended that Jesus was actually the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier named [[Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera|Panthera]].<ref>Also see: [[Jane Schaberg|Schaberg, Jane]]. ''Illegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives'' (Biblical Seminar Series, No 28), {{ISBN|1-85075-533-7}}.</ref> The church father [[Origen]] dismissed this assertion as a complete fabrication in his apologetic treatise ''[[Contra Celsum|Against Celsus]]''.<ref>''Contra Celsum'' by Origen, [[Henry Chadwick (theologian)|Henry Chadwick]] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953) reprint 1980 {{ISBN|0-521-29576-9}} p. 32</ref> How far Celsus sourced his view from Jewish sources remains a subject of discussion.<ref>John Patrick ''The Apology of Origen in Reply to Celsus'' 1892 reprint 2009 {{ISBN|1-110-13388-X}} pp. 22–24</ref>
From the early stages of Christianity, belief in the virginity of Mary and the virgin conception of Jesus, as stated in the gospels, holy and supernatural, was used by detractors, both political and religious, as a topic for discussions, debates, and writings, specifically aimed to challenge the divinity of Jesus and thus Christians and Christianity alike.<ref>Bennett, Clinton, ''In search of Jesus'' 2001 {{ISBN|0-8264-4916-6}} pp. 165–170</ref> In the 2nd century, as part of his [[anti-Christian]] polemic ''[[The True Word]]'', the pagan philosopher [[Celsus]] contended that Jesus was actually the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier named [[Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera|Panthera]].<ref>Also see: [[Jane Schaberg|Schaberg, Jane]]. ''Illegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives'' (Biblical Seminar Series, No 28), {{ISBN|1-85075-533-7}}.</ref> The Church Father [[Origen]] dismissed this assertion as a complete fabrication in his apologetic treatise ''[[Contra Celsum|Against Celsus]]''.<ref>''Contra Celsum'' by Origen, [[Henry Chadwick (theologian)|Henry Chadwick]] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953) reprint 1980 {{ISBN|0-521-29576-9}} p. 32</ref> How far Celsus sourced his view from Jewish sources remains a subject of discussion.<ref>John Patrick ''The Apology of Origen in Reply to Celsus'' 1892 reprint 2009 {{ISBN|1-110-13388-X}} pp. 22–24</ref>


==Christian devotions==
==Christian devotions==
Line 317: Line 331:
===History===
===History===
====2nd century====
====2nd century====
[[Justin Martyr]] was among the first to draw a parallel between Eve and Mary. This derives from his comparison of Adam and Jesus. In his ''[[Dialogue with Trypho]]'', written sometime between 155–167,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Allert|first1=Craig D.|title=Revelation, Truth, Canon and Interpretation: Studies in Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho|date=2002|publisher=Brill|page=34}}</ref> he explains:
 
[[Justin Martyr]] was among the first to draw a [[New Eve|parallel between Eve and Mary]]. This derives from his comparison of Adam and Jesus. In his ''[[Dialogue with Trypho]]'', written sometime between 155 and 167,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Allert|first1=Craig D.|title=Revelation, Truth, Canon and Interpretation: Studies in Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho|date=2002|publisher=Brill|page=34}}</ref> he explains:


{{blockquote|He became man by the Virgin, in order that the disobedience which proceeded from the serpent might receive its destruction in the same manner in which it derived its origin. For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy, when the angel Gabriel announced the good tidings to her that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her, and the power of the Highest would overshadow her: wherefore also the Holy Thing begotten of her is the Son of God; and she replied, 'Be it unto me according to thy word." And by her has He been born, to whom we have proved so many scriptures refer, and by whom God destroys both the serpent and those angels and men who are like him; but works deliverance from death to those who repent of their wickedness and believe upon Him.<ref>{{ws|{{cite book |author=Justin Martyr |translator-first=George |translator-last=Reith |chapter=[[s:Ante-Nicene Christian Library/Dialogue with Trypho|Dialogue with Trypho, Chapter C]] |editor-first1=Alexander |editor-last1=Roberts |editor-first2=James |editor-last2=Donaldson |title=[[Ante-Nicene Christian Library]] |location=Edinburgh |publisher=T. & T. Clark |year=1885<!--probably earlier--> |volume=II}}}}</ref>}}
{{blockquote|He became man by the Virgin, in order that the disobedience which proceeded from the serpent might receive its destruction in the same manner in which it derived its origin. For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy, when the angel Gabriel announced the good tidings to her that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her, and the power of the Highest would overshadow her: wherefore also the Holy Thing begotten of her is the Son of God; and she replied, 'Be it unto me according to thy word." And by her has He been born, to whom we have proved so many scriptures refer, and by whom God destroys both the serpent and those angels and men who are like him; but works deliverance from death to those who repent of their wickedness and believe upon Him.<ref>{{ws|{{cite book |author=Justin Martyr |translator-first=George |translator-last=Reith |chapter=[[s:Ante-Nicene Christian Library/Dialogue with Trypho|Dialogue with Trypho, Chapter C]] |editor-first1=Alexander |editor-last1=Roberts |editor-first2=James |editor-last2=Donaldson |title=[[Ante-Nicene Christian Library]] |location=Edinburgh |publisher=T. & T. Clark |year=1885<!--probably earlier--> |volume=II}}}}</ref>}}


[[Ireneaus]], [[bishop of Lyon]], also takes this up, in ''Against Heresies'', written about the year 182:<ref>{{cite web|title=Philip Schaff: ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus – Christian Classics Ethereal Library|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.i.html|url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127195452/https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.i.html |archivedate=27 November 2021 |website=www.ccel.org}}</ref>
It is possible that the teaching of Mary as the New Eve was part of the apostolic tradition rather than merely Justin Martyr's own creation, according to [[Serafim Seppälä]].<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: ''Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', p. 60. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-952-5652-87-1}}</ref> [[Irenaeus]], [[bishop of Lyon]], also takes up this parallel, in ''Against Heresies'', written about the year 182:<ref>{{cite web|title=Philip Schaff: ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus – Christian Classics Ethereal Library|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.i.html|url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127195452/https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.i.html |archivedate=27 November 2021 |website=www.ccel.org}}</ref>


{{blockquote|In accordance with this design, Mary the Virgin is found obedient, saying, "Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to your word." Luke 1:38 But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. ... having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race; so also did Mary, having a man betrothed [to her], and being nevertheless a virgin, by yielding obedience, become the cause of salvation, both to herself and the whole human race. And on this account does the law term a woman betrothed to a man, the wife of him who had betrothed her, although she was as yet a virgin; thus indicating the back-reference from Mary to Eve,...For the Lord, having been born "the First-begotten of the dead," Revelation 1:5 and receiving into His bosom the ancient fathers, has regenerated them into the life of God, He having been made Himself the beginning of those that live, as Adam became the beginning of those who die. 1 Corinthians 15:20–22 Wherefore also Luke, commencing the genealogy with the Lord, carried it back to Adam, indicating that it was He who regenerated them into the Gospel of life, and not they Him. And thus also it was that the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what the virgin Eve had bound fast through unbelief, this did the virgin Mary set free through faith.<ref>{{cite web|title=Church Fathers: Against Heresies, III.22 (St. Irenaeus) |url=https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103322.htm|url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111203233/https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103322.htm |archivedate=11 November 2020|website=www.newadvent.org}}</ref>}}
{{blockquote|In accordance with this design, Mary the Virgin is found obedient, saying, "Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to your word." Luke 1:38 But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. ... having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race; so also did Mary, having a man betrothed [to her], and being nevertheless a virgin, by yielding obedience, become the cause of salvation, both to herself and the whole human race. And on this account does the law term a woman betrothed to a man, the wife of him who had betrothed her, although she was as yet a virgin; thus indicating the back-reference from Mary to Eve,...For the Lord, having been born "the First-begotten of the dead," Revelation 1:5 and receiving into His bosom the ancient fathers, has regenerated them into the life of God, He having been made Himself the beginning of those that live, as Adam became the beginning of those who die. 1 Corinthians 15:20–22 Wherefore also Luke, commencing the genealogy with the Lord, carried it back to Adam, indicating that it was He who regenerated them into the Gospel of life, and not they Him. And thus also it was that the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what the virgin Eve had bound fast through unbelief, this did the virgin Mary set free through faith.<ref>{{cite web|title=Church Fathers: Against Heresies, III.22 (St. Irenaeus) |url=https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103322.htm|url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111203233/https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103322.htm |archivedate=11 November 2020|website=New Advent}}</ref>}}


During the second century, the Gospel of James was also written. According to [[Stephen J. Shoemaker]], ”its interest in Mary as a figure in her own right and its reverence for her sacred purity mark the beginnings of Marian piety within early Christianity”.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J.: ''Mary in Early Christian Faith and Devotion,'' pp. 229–230. Yale University Press, 2016. {{ISBN|978-0-300-21953-1}}.</ref>
During the second century, the Gospel of James was also written. According to [[Stephen J. Shoemaker]], "its interest in Mary as a figure in her own right and its reverence for her sacred purity mark the beginnings of Marian piety within early Christianity".<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J.: ''Mary in Early Christian Faith and Devotion,'' pp. 229–230. Yale University Press, 2016. {{ISBN|978-0-300-21953-1}}.</ref>


====3rd to 5th centuries====
====3rd to 5th centuries====
Christian devotion to Mary predates the emergence of a specific Marian liturgical system in the 5th century, following the [[First Council of Ephesus]] in 431. In Egypt, the veneration of Mary had started in the 3rd century and the term {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} was used by [[Origen]], the [[Alexandria, Egypt|Alexandrian]] Father of the Church.<ref>Benz, Ernst ''The Eastern Orthodox Church: Its Thought and Life'' 2009 {{ISBN|0-202-36298-1}} p. 62</ref> The earliest known Marian prayer (the {{lang|la|[[Sub tuum praesidium]]}}, or ''Beneath Thy Protection'') is from the 3rd century (perhaps 270), and its text was rediscovered in 1917 on a papyrus in Egypt.<ref>Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; ''Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons'' 2008 {{ISBN|978-1-57918-355-4}} p. 178</ref><ref>''The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3'' by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2003 {{ISBN|90-04-12654-6}} p. 406</ref> Following the [[Edict of Milan]] in 313, by the 5th century artistic images of Mary began to appear in public and larger churches were being dedicated to Mary, such as the [[Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore]] in Rome.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04295c.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Constantine the Great |publisher=Newadvent.org |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=18 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190118133118/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04295c.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>Osborne, John L. "Early Medieval Painting in San Clemente, Rome: The Madonna and Child in the Niche" ''Gesta'' 20.2 (1981:299–310) and (note 9) referencing T. Klauser, Rom under der Kult des Gottesmutter Maria, ''Jahrbuch für der Antike und Christentum'' 15 (1972:120–135).</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/various/basiliche/sm_maggiore/index_en.html |title=The Papal Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=25 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211125104022/https://www.vatican.va/various/basiliche/sm_maggiore/index_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
During the Age of Martyrs and at the latest in the fourth century, the majority of the most essential ideas of Marian devotion already appeared in some form – in the writings of the [[Church Fathers]], apocrypha and visual arts. The lack of sources makes it unclear whether the devotion to Mary played a role in liturgical use during the first centuries of Christianity.<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, p. 368. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-952-5652-87-1}}</ref> In the 4th century, Marian devotion in a liturgical context becomes evident.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J.: Mary in Early Christian Faith and Devotion, p. 202, 236. Yale University Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0-300-21953-1.</ref>
 
The earliest known Marian prayer (the {{lang|la|[[Sub tuum praesidium]]}}, or ''Beneath Thy Protection'') is from the 3rd century (perhaps 270), and its text was rediscovered in 1917 on a papyrus in Egypt.<ref>Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; ''Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons,'' 2008, {{ISBN|978-1-57918-355-4}}, p. 178.</ref><ref>''The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3'' by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2003 {{ISBN|90-04-12654-6}} p. 406</ref> According to some sources, [[Pope Theonas of Alexandria|Theonas of Alexandria]] consecrated one of the first holy places dedicated to Mary during the late 3rd century. An even earlier place has been found in Nazareth, dated to the previous century by some scholars.<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: ''Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', p. 85. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010.</ref> Following the [[Edict of Milan]] in 313, by the 5th century artistic images of Mary began to appear in public and larger churches were being dedicated to Mary, such as the [[Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore]] in Rome.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04295c.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Constantine the Great |publisher=Newadvent.org |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=18 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190118133118/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04295c.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>Osborne, John L. "Early Medieval Painting in San Clemente, Rome: The Madonna and Child in the Niche" ''Gesta'' 20.2 (1981:299–310) and (note 9) referencing T. Klauser, Rom under der Kult des Gottesmutter Maria, ''Jahrbuch für der Antike und Christentum'' 15 (1972:120–135).</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/various/basiliche/sm_maggiore/index_en.html |title=The Papal Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=25 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211125104022/https://www.vatican.va/various/basiliche/sm_maggiore/index_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref> At the [[Council of Ephesus]] in 431, Mary was officially declared the ''[[Theotokos]]'', meaning "God-bearer"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Theotokos |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Theotokos |access-date=29 March 2024 |website=Britannica |language=en |archive-date=19 April 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240419152206/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Theotokos |url-status=live }}</ref> or "Mother of God". The term had possibly been used for centuries<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: ''Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa'', p. 82–83. Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-952-5652-87-1}}</ref> or at least since the early 300s, when it seems to have already been in established use.<ref>Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, p. 114. Maahenki, 2010. {{ISBN|978-952-5652-87-1}}</ref>


The Council of Ephesus itself was long thought to have been held at a church in Ephesus which had been dedicated to Mary about a hundred years before.<ref>Baldovin, John and Johnson, Maxwell, ''Between memory and hope: readings on the liturgical year'' 2001 {{ISBN|0-8146-6025-8}} p. 386</ref><ref>Dalmais, Irénée et al. ''The Church at Prayer: The liturgy and time'' 1985 {{ISBN|0-8146-1366-7}} p. 130</ref><ref>McNally, Terrence, ''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} p. 186</ref> Though, recent archeological surveys indicate that St. Mary's Church in Ephesus did not exist at the time of the Council or, at least, the building was not dedicated to Mary before 500.<ref>Stefan Karwiese, ''[https://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/index2.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oeai.at%2Feng%2Fausland%2Fmarienk.html#federation=archive.wikiwix.com&tab=url The Church of Holy Mary in Ephesos]'', 2008 (phase 3)</ref> The [[Church of the Seat of Mary]] in Palestine was built shortly after the introduction of Marian liturgy at the council of Ephesus, in 456, by a widow named Ikelia.<ref name="Initial">{{cite book |last= Avner |first= Rina |title= The Initial Tradition of the Theotokos at the Kathisma: Earliest Celebrations and the Calendar |work= The Cult of the Mother of God in Byzantium: Texts and Images |series= Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Studies |editor= Leslie Brubaker |editor2= Mary B. Cunningham |year= 2016 |publisher= Routledge |isbn= 978-1351891974 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=xxWoDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT34 |access-date= 8 January 2019 |archive-date= 17 April 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210417204926/https://books.google.com/books?id=xxWoDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT34 |url-status= live }}</ref>
The Council of Ephesus was long thought to have been held at a church in Ephesus which had been dedicated to Mary about a hundred years before.<ref>Baldovin, John and Johnson, Maxwell, ''Between memory and hope: readings on the liturgical year'' 2001 {{ISBN|0-8146-6025-8}} p. 386</ref><ref>Dalmais, Irénée et al. ''The Church at Prayer: The liturgy and time'' 1985 {{ISBN|0-8146-1366-7}} p. 130</ref><ref>McNally, Terrence, ''What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary'' {{ISBN|1-4415-1051-6}} p. 186</ref> Though, recent archeological surveys indicate that St. Mary's Church in Ephesus did not exist at the time of the Council or, at least, the building was not dedicated to Mary before 500.<ref>Stefan Karwiese, ''[https://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/index2.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oeai.at%2Feng%2Fausland%2Fmarienk.html#federation=archive.wikiwix.com&tab=url The Church of Holy Mary in Ephesos] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221205012243/https://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/index2.php?url=http://www.oeai.at/eng/ausland/marienk.html#federation=archive.wikiwix.com&tab=url |date=5 December 2022 }}'', 2008 (phase 3).</ref> The [[Church of the Seat of Mary]] in [[Judea]] was built shortly after the introduction of Marian liturgy at the council of Ephesus, in 456, by a widow named Ikelia.<ref>{{cite book |last= Avner |first= Rina |chapter= The Initial Tradition of the Theotokos at the Kathisma: Earliest Celebrations and the Calendar |title= The Cult of the Mother of God in Byzantium: Texts and Images |series= Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Studies |editor= Leslie Brubaker |editor2= Mary B. Cunningham |year= 2016 |publisher= Routledge |isbn= 978-1351891974 |chapter-url= https://books.google.com/books?id=xxWoDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT34 |access-date= 8 January 2019 |archive-date= 17 April 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210417204926/https://books.google.com/books?id=xxWoDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT34 |url-status= live }}</ref>


According to the 4th-century heresiologist [[Epiphanius of Salamis]], the Virgin Mary was worshipped as a [[mother goddess]] in the Christian sect of [[Collyridianism]], which was found throughout Arabia sometime during the 300s AD. Collyridianism had women performing priestly acts, and made bread offerings to the Virgin Mary. The group was condemned as heretical by the [[Roman Catholic Church]] and was preached against by [[Epiphanius of Salamis]], who wrote about the group in his writings titled [[Panarion]].<ref>[https://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/COLLYRID.TXT Collyridianism – EWTN] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120924074201/https://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/COLLYRID.TXT |date=24 September 2012 }} Retrieved 11 September 2014</ref>
According to the 4th-century heresiologist [[Epiphanius of Salamis]], the Virgin Mary was worshipped as a [[mother goddess]] in the Christian sect of [[Collyridianism]], which was found throughout Arabia sometime during the 300s AD. Collyridianism had women performing priestly acts, and made bread offerings to the Virgin Mary. The group was condemned as heretical by the [[Roman Catholic Church]] and was preached against by [[Epiphanius of Salamis]], who wrote about the group in his writings titled [[Panarion]].<ref>[https://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/COLLYRID.TXT Collyridianism – EWTN] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120924074201/https://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/COLLYRID.TXT |date=24 September 2012 }} Retrieved 11 September 2014</ref>


====Byzantium====
====Byzantium====
During the era of the Byzantine Empire, Mary was venerated as the virginal Mother of God and as an intercessor.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Virgin Mary in Byzantium, c. 400–1000: Hymns, Homilies and Hagiography |last=Cunningham |first=Mary B. |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2021 |isbn=978-1-108-84569-4 |pages=211–212 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hMGFEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA422}}</ref>
During the era of the [[Byzantine Empire]], Mary was venerated as the virginal Mother of God and as an intercessor.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Virgin Mary in Byzantium, c. 400–1000: Hymns, Homilies and Hagiography |last=Cunningham |first=Mary B. |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2021 |isbn=978-1-108-84569-4 |pages=211–212 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hMGFEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA422}}</ref>


[[Ephesus]] is a cultic centre of Mary, the site of the first church dedicated to her and the rumoured place of her death. Ephesus was previously a centre for worship of [[Artemis]], a virgin goddess; the [[Temple of Artemis]] there is regarded as one of the [[Seven Wonders of the Ancient World]]. The cult of Mary was furthered by Queen Theodora in the 6th century.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ephesus.us/ephesus/did_you_know_ephesus.htm|title=Mysterious facts about Ephesus, Ephesus Turkey|last=Ephesus.us|website=www.ephesus.us|access-date=16 September 2015|archive-date=1 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210501034428/https://www.ephesus.us/ephesus/did_you_know_ephesus.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://mymultiplesclerosis.co.uk/dw/virgin-mary-justinian-theotokus-theodora-kate-cooper/|title=Virgin Mary – Justinian – Theotokus – Theodora – Kate Cooper – Divine Women|date=18 July 2015|access-date=16 September 2015|archive-date=21 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180621072946/https://mymultiplesclerosis.co.uk/dw/virgin-mary-justinian-theotokus-theodora-kate-cooper/|url-status=live}}</ref> According to William E. Phipps, in the book ''Survivals of Roman Religion'',<ref>{{cite web|last1=Laing|first1=Gordon|title=Survivals of Roman Religion|year=1931|publisher=Longmans, Green And Co.|url=https://archive.org/stream/survivalsofroman009154mbp/survivalsofroman009154mbp_djvu.txt}}</ref> "Gordon Laing argues convincingly that the worship of Artemis as both virgin and mother at the grand Ephesian temple contributed to the veneration of Mary."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Phipps|first1=William E.|title=Supernaturalism in Christianity: Its Growth and Cure|date=2008|publisher=Mercer University Press|isbn=978-0881460940|page=46|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hk1dZI5JYzEC&q=Gordon+Laing+Artemis+as+both+virgin+and+mother+at+the+grand+Ephesian+temple+contributed+to+the+veneration+of+Mary.&pg=PA46|access-date=10 November 2015|archive-date=20 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020143413/https://books.google.com/books?id=hk1dZI5JYzEC&q=Gordon+Laing+Artemis+as+both+virgin+and+mother+at+the+grand+Ephesian+temple+contributed+to+the+veneration+of+Mary.&pg=PA46|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[Ephesus]] is a cultic centre of Mary, the site of the first church dedicated to her and the rumoured place of her death. Ephesus was previously a centre for worship of [[Artemis]], a virgin goddess; the [[Temple of Artemis]] there is regarded as one of the [[Seven Wonders of the Ancient World]]. The cult of Mary was furthered by [[Theodora (wife of Justinian I)|Queen Theodora]] in the 6th century.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ephesus.us/ephesus/did_you_know_ephesus.htm|title=Mysterious facts about Ephesus, Ephesus Turkey|last=Ephesus.us|website=www.ephesus.us|access-date=16 September 2015|archive-date=1 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210501034428/https://www.ephesus.us/ephesus/did_you_know_ephesus.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://mymultiplesclerosis.co.uk/dw/virgin-mary-justinian-theotokus-theodora-kate-cooper/|title=Virgin Mary – Justinian – Theotokus – Theodora – Kate Cooper – Divine Women|date=18 July 2015|access-date=16 September 2015|archive-date=21 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180621072946/https://mymultiplesclerosis.co.uk/dw/virgin-mary-justinian-theotokus-theodora-kate-cooper/|url-status=usurped}}</ref> According to William E. Phipps, in the book ''Survivals of Roman Religion'',<ref>{{cite web|last1=Laing|first1=Gordon|title=Survivals of Roman Religion|year=1931|publisher=Longmans, Green And Co.|url=https://archive.org/stream/survivalsofroman009154mbp/survivalsofroman009154mbp_djvu.txt}}</ref> "Gordon Laing argues convincingly that the worship of Artemis as both virgin and mother at the grand Ephesian temple contributed to the veneration of Mary."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Phipps|first1=William E.|title=Supernaturalism in Christianity: Its Growth and Cure|date=2008|publisher=Mercer University Press|isbn=978-0881460940|page=46|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hk1dZI5JYzEC&q=Gordon+Laing+Artemis+as+both+virgin+and+mother+at+the+grand+Ephesian+temple+contributed+to+the+veneration+of+Mary.&pg=PA46|access-date=10 November 2015|archive-date=20 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211020143413/https://books.google.com/books?id=hk1dZI5JYzEC&q=Gordon+Laing+Artemis+as+both+virgin+and+mother+at+the+grand+Ephesian+temple+contributed+to+the+veneration+of+Mary.&pg=PA46|url-status=live}}</ref>


====Middle Ages====
====Middle Ages====
[[File:Angelico, madonna col bambino, pinacoteca sabauda.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|''[[Madonna of humility]]'' by [[Fra Angelico]], {{circa|1430}}. A traditional depiction of Mary wearing blue clothes.]]
[[File:Angelico, madonna col bambino, pinacoteca sabauda.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|''[[Madonna of humility]]'' by [[Fra Angelico]], {{circa|1430}}. A traditional depiction of Mary wearing blue clothes.]]
The Middle Ages saw many legends about Mary, her parents, and even her grandparents.<ref>Toronto Star article – In December 2010, Catherine Lawless of the [[University of Limerick]] stated that by analyzing 15th century Florentine manuscripts, she had concluded that 'Ismeria' was the maternal grandmother of Mary. [https://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/905109--is-this-the-real-identity-of-jesus-s-great-grandmother?bn=1 ''Toronto Star'' Dec 2010] {{Webarchive |date=14 November 2012 |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121114053558/https://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/905109--is-this-the-real-identity-of-jesus-s-great-grandmother?bn=1}} [https://news.discovery.com/history/jesus-great-grandmother.html Discovery News] {{Webarchive |date=18 November 2012 |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121118154014/https://news.discovery.com/history/jesus-great-grandmother.html}}</ref> Mary's popularity increased dramatically from the 12th century,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Mâle |first1=Emile|translator1-last=Mathews|translator1-first=Marthiel|title=Religious Art in France: The Twelfth Century|date=1978}}</ref> linked to the Vatican's designation of Mary as the [[mediatrix]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Warner|first1=Marina|title=Alone of All her Sex: The Myth and the Cult of the Virgin Mary|date=1976}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Pelikan|first1=Jaroslav|year=1996|title=Mary Through the Centuries: Her Place in the History of Culture|url=https://archive.org/details/marythroughcentu00peli|url-access=registration|publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0300069518}}</ref>
The Middle Ages saw many legends about Mary, her parents, and even her grandparents.<ref>Toronto Star article – In December 2010, Catherine Lawless of the [[University of Limerick]] stated that by analyzing 15th century Florentine manuscripts, she had concluded that 'Ismeria' was the maternal grandmother of Mary. [https://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/905109--is-this-the-real-identity-of-jesus-s-great-grandmother?bn=1 ''Toronto Star'' Dec 2010] {{Webarchive |date=14 November 2012 |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121114053558/https://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/905109--is-this-the-real-identity-of-jesus-s-great-grandmother?bn=1}} [https://news.discovery.com/history/jesus-great-grandmother.html Discovery News] {{Webarchive |date=18 November 2012 |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121118154014/https://news.discovery.com/history/jesus-great-grandmother.html}}</ref> Mary's popularity increased dramatically from the 12th century,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Mâle |first1=Emile|translator1-last=Mathews|translator1-first=Marthiel|title=Religious Art in France: The Twelfth Century|date=1978}}</ref> linked to the Roman Catholic Church's designation of Mary as [[Mediatrix]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Warner|first1=Marina|title=Alone of All her Sex: The Myth and the Cult of the Virgin Mary|date=1976}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Pelikan|first1=Jaroslav|year=1996|title=Mary Through the Centuries: Her Place in the History of Culture|url=https://archive.org/details/marythroughcentu00peli|url-access=registration|publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0300069518}}</ref>


====Post-Reformation====
====Post-Reformation====
[[File:The Madonna in Sorrow.jpg|thumb|227x227px|''Our Lady of Sorrows'' by [[Giovanni Battista Salvi da Sassoferrato]], 17th century]]
[[File:The Madonna in Sorrow.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|''Our Lady of Sorrows'' by [[Giovanni Battista Salvi da Sassoferrato]], 17th century]]
Over the centuries, devotion and veneration to Mary has varied greatly among Christian traditions. For instance, while Protestants show scant attention to Marian prayers or devotions, of all the saints whom the Orthodox venerate, the most honored is Mary, who is considered "more honorable than the [[Cherubim]] and more glorious than the [[Seraphim]]".<ref name=Fairbairn >''Eastern Orthodoxy through Western eyes'' by Donald Fairbairn 2002 {{ISBN|0-664-22497-0}} pp. 99–101</ref>
Over the centuries, devotion and veneration to Mary has varied greatly among Christian traditions. For instance, while Protestants show scant attention to Marian prayers or devotions, of all the saints whom the Orthodox venerate, the most honored is Mary, who is considered "more honorable than the [[Cherubim]] and more glorious than the [[Seraphim]]".<ref name="Fairbairn-2002" >''Eastern Orthodoxy through Western eyes'' by Donald Fairbairn 2002 {{ISBN|0-664-22497-0}} pp. 99–101</ref>


Orthodox theologian [[Sergei Bulgakov]] wrote: "Love and veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary is the soul of Orthodox piety. A faith in Christ which does not include his mother is another faith, another Christianity from that of the Orthodox church."<ref name=Bulgakov >''The Orthodox Church'' by Serge? Nikolaevich Bulgakov 1997 {{ISBN|0-88141-051-9}} p. 116</ref>
Orthodox theologian [[Sergei Bulgakov]] wrote: "Love and veneration for the Virgin is the soul of Orthodox piety. A faith in Christ which does not include [...] His mother is another faith, another Christianity from that of the Orthodox Church."<ref name="Bulgakov-1997" >''The Orthodox Church'' by Serge? Nikolaevich Bulgakov 1997 {{ISBN|0-88141-051-9}} p. 116</ref>


Although the Catholics and the Orthodox may honor and venerate Mary, they do not view her as divine, nor do they worship her. Roman Catholics view Mary as subordinate to Christ, but uniquely so, in that she is seen as above all other creatures.<ref>''Miravalle, Mark. Introduction to Mary''. 1993 Queenship Publishing {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}} pp. 92–93</ref> Similarly, Theologian [[Sergei Bulgakov]] wrote that the Orthodox view Mary as "superior to all created beings" and "ceaselessly pray for her intercession". However, she is not considered a "substitute for the One Mediator" who is Christ.<ref name=Bulgakov /> "Let Mary be in honor, but let worship be given to the Lord", he wrote.<ref>''The Orthodox word'', Volumes 12–13, 1976 p. 73</ref> Similarly, Catholics do not worship Mary as a divine being, but rather "hyper-venerate" her. In Roman Catholic theology, the term {{lang|la|[[veneration|hyperdulia]]}} is reserved for Marian veneration, {{lang|la|[[latria]]}} for the worship of God, and {{lang|la|[[veneration|dulia]]}} for the veneration of other saints and angels.<ref>Trigilio, John and Brighenti, Kenneth ''The Catholicism Answer Book'' 2007 {{ISBN|1-4022-0806-5}} p. 58</ref> The definition of the three level hierarchy of {{lang|la|latria}}, {{lang|la|hyperdulia}} and {{lang|la|dulia}} goes back to the [[Second Council of Nicaea]] in 787.<ref>''The History of the Christian Church'' by Philip Smith 2009 {{ISBN|1-150-72245-2}} p. 288</ref>
Although the Catholics and the Orthodox may honor and venerate Mary, they do not view her as divine, nor do they worship her. Roman Catholics view Mary as subordinate to Christ, but uniquely so, in that she is seen as above all other creatures.<ref>''Miravalle, Mark. Introduction to Mary''. 1993 Queenship Publishing {{ISBN|978-1-882972-06-7}} pp. 92–93</ref> Similarly, Bulgakov wrote that the Orthodox view Mary as "superior to all created beings" and "ceaselessly pray for her intercession". However, she is not considered a "substitute for the One Mediator" who is Christ.<ref name="Bulgakov-1997" /> "Let Mary be in honor, but let worship be given to the Lord", he wrote.<ref>''The Orthodox word'', Volumes 12–13, 1976 p. 73</ref> Similarly, Catholics do not worship Mary as a divine being, but rather "hyper-venerate" her. In Roman Catholic theology, the term {{lang|la|[[veneration|hyperdulia]]}} is reserved for Marian veneration, {{lang|la|[[latria]]}} for the worship of God, and {{lang|la|[[veneration|dulia]]}} for the veneration of other saints and angels.<ref>Trigilio, John and Brighenti, Kenneth ''The Catholicism Answer Book'' 2007 {{ISBN|1-4022-0806-5}} p. 58</ref> The definition of the three level hierarchy of {{lang|la|latria}}, {{lang|la|hyperdulia}} and {{lang|la|dulia}} goes back to the [[Second Council of Nicaea]] in 787.<ref>''The History of the Christian Church'' by Philip Smith 2009 {{ISBN|1-150-72245-2}} p. 288</ref>


Devotions to artistic depictions of Mary vary among Christian traditions. There is a long tradition of [[Catholic Marian art]] and no image permeates [[Catholic art]] as does the image of [[Madonna and Child]].<ref>''The Celebration of Faith: The Virgin Mary'' by Alexander Schmemann 2001 {{ISBN|0-88141-141-8}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Sls53hUSodgC 11] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705120656/https://books.google.com/books?id=Sls53hUSodgC |date=5 July 2021 }}</ref> The icon of the Virgin {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} with Christ is, without doubt, the most venerated icon in the Orthodox Church.<ref>De Sherbinin, Julie ''Chekhov and Russian religious culture: the poetics of the Marian paradigm'' 1997 {{ISBN|0-8101-1404-6}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=w6qCCpYK1TsC&q=orthodox++venerated+icon&pg=PA15 15] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705123340/https://books.google.com/books?id=w6qCCpYK1TsC&pg=PA15#v=onepage&q=orthodox%20%20venerated%20icon&f=false |date=5 July 2021 }}</ref> Both Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians venerate images and icons of Mary, given that the [[Second Council of Nicaea]] in 787 permitted their veneration with the understanding that those who venerate the image are venerating the reality of the person it represents,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_29101997_en.html |title=Pope John Paul II, General Audience, 1997 |publisher=Vatican.va |date=29 October 1997 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=3 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130303020028/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_29101997_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and the 842 Synod of Constantinople confirming the same.<ref>Kilmartin Edward ''The Eucharist in the West'' 1998 {{ISBN|0-8146-6204-8}} p. 80</ref> According to Orthodox piety and traditional practice, however, believers ought to pray before and venerate only flat, two-dimensional icons, and not three-dimensional statues.<ref>Ciaravino, Helene ''How to Pray'' 2001 {{ISBN|0-7570-0012-6}} p. 118</ref>
Devotions to artistic depictions of Mary vary among Christian traditions. There is a long tradition of [[Catholic Marian art]] and no image permeates [[Catholic art]] as does the image of [[Madonna and Child]].<ref>''The Celebration of Faith: The Virgin Mary'' by Alexander Schmemann 2001 {{ISBN|0-88141-141-8}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Sls53hUSodgC 11] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705120656/https://books.google.com/books?id=Sls53hUSodgC |date=5 July 2021 }}</ref> The icon of the Virgin {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}} with Christ is, without doubt, the most venerated icon in the Orthodox Church.<ref>De Sherbinin, Julie ''Chekhov and Russian religious culture: the poetics of the Marian paradigm'' 1997 {{ISBN|0-8101-1404-6}} p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=w6qCCpYK1TsC&q=orthodox++venerated+icon&pg=PA15 15] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210705123340/https://books.google.com/books?id=w6qCCpYK1TsC&pg=PA15#v=onepage&q=orthodox%20%20venerated%20icon&f=false |date=5 July 2021 }}</ref> Both Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians venerate images and icons of Mary, given that the [[Second Council of Nicaea]] in 787 permitted their veneration with the understanding that those who venerate the image are venerating the reality of the person it represents,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_29101997_en.html |title=Pope John Paul II, General Audience, 1997 |publisher=Vatican.va |date=29 October 1997 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=3 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130303020028/https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_29101997_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and the 842 Synod of Constantinople confirming the same.<ref>Kilmartin, Edward. ''The Eucharist in the West'' 1998. {{ISBN|0-8146-6204-8}}, p. 80.</ref> According to Orthodox piety and traditional practice, however, believers ought to pray before and venerate only flat, two-dimensional icons, and not three-dimensional statues.<ref>Ciaravino, Helene ''How to Pray'' 2001 {{ISBN|0-7570-0012-6}} p. 118</ref>


The Anglican position towards Mary is in general more conciliatory than that of Protestants at large and in a book he wrote about praying with the icons of Mary, [[Rowan Williams]], former [[archbishop of Canterbury]], said: "It is not only that we cannot understand Mary without seeing her as pointing to Christ; we cannot understand Christ without seeing his attention to Mary."<ref name="Schroedel81" /><ref>[[Rowan Williams|Williams, Rowan]] ''Ponder these things: praying with icons of the Virgin'' 2002 {{ISBN|1-85311-362-X}} p. 7</ref>
The Anglican position towards Mary is in general more conciliatory than that of Protestants at large and in a book he wrote about praying with the icons of Mary, [[Rowan Williams]], former [[archbishop of Canterbury]], said: "It is not only that we cannot understand Mary without seeing her as pointing to Christ; we cannot understand Christ without seeing his attention to Mary."<ref name="Schroedel-2006" /><ref>[[Rowan Williams|Williams, Rowan]] ''Ponder these things: praying with icons of the Virgin'' 2002 {{ISBN|1-85311-362-X}} p. 7</ref>


On 4 September 1781, 11 families of {{lang|es|[[Los Angeles Pobladores|pobladores]]}} arrived from the Gulf of California and established a city in the name of [[Charles III of Spain|King Carlos III]]. The small town was named {{lang|es|El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora de los Ángeles de la Porciúncula}} (after our Lady of the Angels), a city that today is known simply as [[Los Angeles]]. In an attempt to revive the custom of religious processions within the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles|Archdiocese of Los Angeles]], in September 2011 the [[Queen of Angels Foundation]], and founder Mark Anchor Albert, inaugurated an annual Grand Marian Procession in the heart of [[Downtown Los Angeles]]' historic core. This yearly procession, held on the last Saturday of August and intended to coincide with the anniversary of the founding of the City of Los Angeles, begins at the [[Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels]] and concludes at the parish of [[La Iglesia de Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles]] which is part of the [[Los Angeles Plaza Historic District]], better known as "La Placita".{{citation needed|date=May 2022}}
On 4 September 1781, 11 families of {{lang|es|[[Los Angeles Pobladores|pobladores]]}} arrived from the Gulf of California and established a city in the name of [[Charles III of Spain|King Carlos III]]. The small town was named {{lang|es|El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora de los Ángeles de la Porciúncula}} (after our Lady of the Angels), a city that today is known simply as [[Los Angeles]]. In an attempt to revive the custom of religious processions within the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles|Archdiocese of Los Angeles]], in September 2011 the [[Queen of Angels Foundation]], and founder Mark Anchor Albert, inaugurated an annual Grand Marian Procession in the heart of [[Downtown Los Angeles]]' historic core. This yearly procession, held on the last Saturday of August and intended to coincide with the anniversary of the founding of the City of Los Angeles, begins at the [[Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels]] and concludes at the parish of [[La Iglesia de Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles]] which is part of the [[Los Angeles Plaza Historic District]], better known as "La Placita".<ref>[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/34391/marian-procession-to-mark-los-angeles-235th-birthday  Catholic News Agency website, ''Marian procession to mark Los Angeles’ 235th birthday'', article dated 18 August 2016]</ref><ref>[https://angelusnews.com/local/la-catholics/this-years-grand-marian-procession-marks-a-time-of-celebration-and-a-call-for-renewal-in-the-church/  Angelus News website, ''This year’s Grand Marian Procession marks a time of celebration and a call for renewal in the Church'', article by Tom Hoffarth dated 31 August 2018]</ref>


===Feasts===
===Feasts===
{{Main|Marian feast days}}
{{Main|Marian feast days}}
The earliest feasts that relate to Mary grew out of the cycle of feasts that celebrated the [[Nativity of Jesus]]. Given that according to the Gospel of Luke (Luke 2:22–40),<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:22–40}}</ref> 40 days after the birth of Jesus, along with the [[Presentation of Jesus at the Temple]], Mary was purified according to Jewish customs. The Feast of the Purification began to be celebrated by the 5th century, and became the "Feast of [[Simeon (Gospel of Luke)|Simeon]]" in [[Byzantium]].<ref name =MaryClayton>Clayton, Mary. ''The Cult of the Virgin Mary in Anglo-Saxon England''. 2003 {{ISBN|0-521-53115-2}} pp. 26–37</ref>
 
The earliest feasts that relate to Mary grew out of the cycle of feasts that celebrated the [[Nativity of Jesus]]. Given that according to the Gospel of Luke (Luke 2:22–40),<ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:22–40}}</ref> 40 days after the birth of Jesus, along with the [[Presentation of Jesus at the Temple]], Mary was purified according to Jewish customs. The Feast of the Purification began to be celebrated by the 5th century, and became the "Feast of [[Simeon (Gospel of Luke)|Simeon]]" in [[Byzantium]].<ref name="Clayton-2003">Clayton, Mary. ''The Cult of the Virgin Mary in Anglo-Saxon England''. 2003 {{ISBN|0-521-53115-2}} pp. 26–37</ref>


[[File:Pjazzasantamarijaghaxaqmalta.JPG|thumb|left|Village decorations during the ''[[Feast of the Assumption]]'' in [[Għaxaq]], Malta]]
[[File:Pjazzasantamarijaghaxaqmalta.JPG|thumb|left|Village decorations during the ''[[Feast of the Assumption]]'' in [[Għaxaq]], Malta]]
In the 7th and 8th centuries, four more Marian feasts were established in [[Eastern Christianity]]. In the [[Western Christianity|West]], a feast dedicated to Mary, just before Christmas was celebrated in the Churches of [[Milan]] and [[Ravenna]] in Italy in the 7th century. The four Roman Marian feasts of Purification, Annunciation, Assumption and Nativity of Mary were gradually and sporadically introduced into England by the 11th century.<ref name =MaryClayton />
In the 7th and 8th centuries, four more Marian feasts were established in [[Eastern Christianity]]. In the [[Western Christianity|West]], a feast dedicated to Mary, just before Christmas was celebrated in the Churches of [[Milan]] and [[Ravenna]] in Italy in the 7th century. The four Roman Marian feasts of Purification, Annunciation, Assumption and Nativity of Mary were gradually and sporadically introduced into England by the 11th century.<ref name="Clayton-2003" />


Over time, the number and nature of feasts (and the associated [[Titles of Mary]]) and the venerative practices that accompany them have varied a great deal among diverse Christian traditions. Overall, there are significantly more titles, feasts and venerative Marian practices among [[Roman Catholics]] than any other Christians traditions.<ref name=FrankFlinn >Flinn, Frank K., J. Gordon Melton''Encyclopedia of Catholicism''. 2007 {{ISBN|0-8160-5455-X}} pp. 443–444</ref> Some such feasts relate to specific events, such as the Feast of [[Our Lady of Victory]], based on the 1571 victory of the [[Papal States]] in the [[Battle of Lepanto (1571)|Battle of Lepanto]].<ref>[[EWTN]] on [[Battle of Lepanto (1571)]] [https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/olislam.htm Our Lady and Islam: Heaven's Peace Plan – EWTN] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141023223846/https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/olislam.htm |date=23 October 2014 }}</ref><ref>by Butler, Alban, Peter Doyle. ''Butler's Lives of the Saints''. 1999 {{ISBN|0-86012-253-0}} p. 222</ref>
Over time, the number and nature of feasts (and the associated [[Titles of Mary]]) and the venerative practices that accompany them have varied a great deal among diverse Christian traditions. Overall, there are significantly more titles, feasts and venerative Marian practices among [[Roman Catholics]] than any other Christians traditions.<ref name="Flinn-2007" >Flinn, Frank K., J. Gordon Melton''Encyclopedia of Catholicism''. 2007 {{ISBN|0-8160-5455-X}} pp. 443–444</ref> Some such feasts relate to specific events, such as the Feast of [[Our Lady of Victory]], based on the 1571 victory of the [[Papal States]] in the [[Battle of Lepanto (1571)|Battle of Lepanto]].<ref>[[EWTN]] on [[Battle of Lepanto (1571)]] [https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/olislam.htm Our Lady and Islam: Heaven's Peace Plan – EWTN] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141023223846/https://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/olislam.htm |date=23 October 2014 }}</ref><ref>by Butler, Alban, Peter Doyle. ''Butler's Lives of the Saints''. 1999, {{ISBN|0-86012-253-0}}, p. 222.</ref>


Differences in feasts may also originate from doctrinal issues—the [[Feast of the Assumption]] is such an example. Given that there is no agreement among all Christians on the circumstances of the death, [[Dormition of the Theotokos|Dormition]] or Assumption of Mary, the feast of assumption is celebrated among some denominations and not others.<ref name="Hillerbrand" /><ref>Jackson, Gregory Lee, ''Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison''. 1993 {{ISBN|978-0-615-16635-3}} p. 254</ref> While the Catholic Church celebrates the Feast of the Assumption on 15 August, some [[Eastern Catholic Churches|Eastern Catholics]] celebrate it as [[Dormition of the Mother of God|Dormition of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}]], and may do so on 28 August, if they follow the [[Julian calendar]]. The [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox]] also celebrate it as the Dormition of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, one of their 12 [[Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church|Great Feasts]]. Protestants do not celebrate this, or any other Marian feasts.<ref name="Hillerbrand" />
Differences in feasts may also originate from doctrinal issues—the [[Feast of the Assumption]] is such an example. Given that there is no agreement among all Christians on the circumstances of the death, [[Dormition of the Theotokos|Dormition]] or Assumption of Mary, the feast of assumption is celebrated among some denominations and not others.<ref name="Hillerbrand-2003" /><ref>Jackson, Gregory Lee, ''Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison''. 1993 {{ISBN|978-0-615-16635-3}} p. 254</ref> While the Roman Catholic Church celebrates the Feast of the Assumption on 15 August, some [[Eastern Catholic Churches|Eastern Catholics]] celebrate it as [[Dormition of the Mother of God|Dormition of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}]], and may do so on 28 August, if they follow the [[Julian calendar]]. The [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox]] also celebrate it as the Dormition of the {{transliteration|grc|Theotokos}}, one of their 12 [[Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church|Great Feasts]]. Protestants do not celebrate this, or any other Marian feasts.<ref name="Hillerbrand-2003" />


===Relics===
===Relics===
The veneration of marian [[relics]] used to be common practice before the [[Reformation]]. It was later largely surpassed by the veneration of marian images.
The veneration of Marian [[relics]] used to be common practice before the [[Reformation]]. It was later largely surpassed by the veneration of Marian images.


==== Bodily relics ====
==== Bodily relics ====
Line 382: Line 400:


==== Clothes ====
==== Clothes ====
Clothes which are believed to have belonged to Mary include the [[Cincture of the Theotokos]] kept in the [[Vatopedi monastery]] and her [[Holy Girdle]] kept in [[Mount Athos]].
[[File:Syriac Orthodox Holy Girdle.jpg|thumb|Late His Eminence Meletios Barnabas, Former [[Syriac Orthodox Archdiocese of Homs|Syriac Orthodox Arch Bishop of Homs]], with the [[Holy Girdle]] of the [[Virgin Mary]]]]
Clothes which are believed to have belonged to Mary include the [[Cincture of the Theotokos]] kept in the [[Vatopedi monastery]] and her [[Holy Girdle]] kept in [[Saint Mary Church of the Holy Belt|Holy Belt Church, Homs]].


Other relics are said to have been collected during later [[marian apparitions]], such as her robe, veil, and part of her belt which were kept in [[Church of St. Mary of Blachernae (Istanbul)|Blachernae church]] in [[Constantinople]] after she appeared there during the 10th century. These relics, now lost, are celebrated by the [[Eastern Orthodox]] and [[Byzantine Catholic Church]]es as the [[Intercession of the Theotokos]].
Other relics are said to have been collected during later [[Marian apparitions]], such as her robe, veil, and part of her belt which were kept in [[Church of St. Mary of Blachernae (Istanbul)|Blachernae church]] in [[Constantinople]] after she appeared there during the 10th century. These relics, now lost, are celebrated by the [[Eastern Orthodox]] and [[Byzantine Catholic Church]]es as the [[Intercession of the Theotokos]].


Few other objects are said to have been touched or given by Mary during [[Marian apparitions|apparitions]], notably a 1531 image printed on a ''[[Tilmàtli|tilma]]'', known as [[Our Lady of Guadalupe]], belonging to [[Juan Diego]].
Few other objects are said to have been touched or given by Mary during [[Marian apparitions|apparitions]], notably a 1531 image printed on a ''[[Tilmàtli|tilma]]'', known as [[Our Lady of Guadalupe]], belonging to [[Juan Diego]].
Line 392: Line 411:
Places where Mary is believed to have lived include the [[Basilica della Santa Casa]] in [[Loreto, Marche]], and the [[House of the Virgin Mary]] in [[Ephesus]].
Places where Mary is believed to have lived include the [[Basilica della Santa Casa]] in [[Loreto, Marche]], and the [[House of the Virgin Mary]] in [[Ephesus]].


Her burial place is believed by [[Eastern Christians]] to be the [[Tomb of the Virgin Mary]] in [[Jerusalem]].
[[Eastern Christians]] believe that she died and was put in the [[Tomb of the Virgin Mary]] near [[Jerusalem]] before the [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]].


The belief that Mary's house was in [[Ephesus]] is recent, as it was claimed in the 19th century based on the visions of [[Anne Catherine Emmerich]], an [[Augustinian nun]] in Germany.<ref name=Vatican >{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/saints/ns_lit_doc_20041003_emmerick_en.html |title=Anna Katharina Emmerick (1774–1824), biography |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=9 September 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040909222047/https://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/saints/ns_lit_doc_20041003_emmerick_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>Emmerich, Anna Catherine: ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ'' {{ISBN|978-0-89555-210-5}} p. viii</ref> It has since been named as the [[House of the Virgin Mary]] by [[Christian pilgrimage|Roman Catholic pilgrims]] who consider it the place where Mary lived until her assumption.<ref>''Frommer's Turkey'' by Lynn A. Levine 2010 {{ISBN|0470593660}} pp. 254–255</ref><ref>''Home of the Assumption: Reconstructing Mary's Life in Ephesus'' by V. Antony John Alaharasan 2006 {{ISBN|1929039387}} p. 38</ref><ref>''The Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption'' by Stephen J. Shoemaker 2006 {{ISBN|0199210748}} p. 76</ref><ref>''Mary's House'' by Donald Carroll (20 April 2000) Veritas, {{ISBN|0953818802}}</ref> The Gospel of John states that Mary went to live with the [[Disciple whom Jesus loved]],<ref>{{Bibleverse|John|19:27}}</ref> [[Disciple whom Jesus loved#Identity|traditionally identified]] as [[John the Evangelist]].<ref>{{Bibleverse|John|21:20–24}}</ref> [[Irenaeus]] and [[Eusebius of Caesarea]] wrote in their histories that John later went to Ephesus, which may provide the basis for the early belief that Mary also lived in Ephesus with John.<ref>[[Irenaeus]], ''[[On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis|Adversus haereses]]'' III,1,1; [[Eusebius of Caesarea]], ''Church History, III,1''</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=1 July 1912 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=6 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706013025/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>
The belief that Mary's house was in [[Ephesus]] is recent, as it was claimed in the 19th century based on the visions of [[Anne Catherine Emmerich]], an [[Augustinian nun]] in Germany.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/saints/ns_lit_doc_20041003_emmerick_en.html |title=Anna Katharina Emmerick (1774–1824), biography |publisher=Vatican.va |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=9 September 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040909222047/https://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/saints/ns_lit_doc_20041003_emmerick_en.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>Emmerich, Anna Catherine: ''The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ'' {{ISBN|978-0-89555-210-5}} p. viii</ref> It has since been named as the [[House of the Virgin Mary]] by [[Christian pilgrimage|Roman Catholic pilgrims]] who consider it the place where Mary lived until her assumption.<ref>''Frommer's Turkey'' by Lynn A. Levine 2010 {{ISBN|0470593660}} pp. 254–255</ref><ref>''Home of the Assumption: Reconstructing Mary's Life in Ephesus'' by V. Antony John Alaharasan 2006 {{ISBN|1929039387}} p. 38</ref><ref>Stephen J. Schoemaker, 2006. ''The Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption,'' {{ISBN|0199210748}}, p. 76.</ref><ref>''Mary's House'' by Donald Carroll (20 April 2000) Veritas, {{ISBN|0953818802}}</ref> The Gospel of John states that Mary went to live with the [[Disciple whom Jesus loved]],<ref>{{Bibleverse|John|19:27}}</ref> [[Disciple whom Jesus loved#Identity|traditionally identified]] as [[John the Evangelist]]<ref>Based on {{Bibleverse|John|21:20–24}}</ref> and [[John the Apostle]]. [[Irenaeus]] and [[Eusebius of Caesarea]] wrote in their histories that John later went to Ephesus, which may provide the basis for the early belief that Mary also lived in Ephesus with John.<ref>[[Irenaeus]], ''[[On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis|Adversus haereses]]'' III,1,1; [[Eusebius of Caesarea]], ''Church History, III,1''</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=1 July 1912 |access-date=30 September 2013 |archive-date=6 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706013025/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14774a.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>


The apparition of [[Our Lady of the Pillar]] in the first century was believed to be a [[bilocation]], as it occurred in [[Spain]] while Mary was living in Ephesus or Jerusalem. The pillar on which she was standing during the apparition is believed to be kept in the [[Cathedral-Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar]] in [[Zaragoza]] and is therefore venerated as a relics, as it was in physical contact with Mary.
The apparition of [[Our Lady of the Pillar]] in the first century was believed to be a [[bilocation]], as it occurred in [[Spain]] while Mary was living in Ephesus or Jerusalem. The pillar on which she was standing during the apparition is believed to be kept in the [[Cathedral-Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar]] in [[Zaragoza]] and is therefore venerated as a relics, as it was in physical contact with Mary.
Line 402: Line 421:
{{See also|Madonna (art)|Marian art in the Catholic Church}}
{{See also|Madonna (art)|Marian art in the Catholic Church}}


In paintings, Mary is traditionally portrayed in [[Marian blue|blue]]. This tradition can trace its origin to the Byzantine Empire, from {{circa|500}} AD, where blue was "the colour of an empress". A more practical explanation for the use of this colour is that in Medieval and Renaissance Europe, the blue pigment was derived from the rock [[lapis lazuli]], a stone of greater value than gold, which was imported from Afghanistan. Beyond a painter's retainer, patrons were expected to purchase any gold or lapis lazuli to be used in the painting. Hence, it was an expression of devotion and glorification to swathe the Virgin in gowns of blue. Transformations in visual depictions of Mary from the 13th to 15th centuries mirror her "social" standing within the Church and in society.<ref name="Kugeares">{{cite book |last1=Kugeares |first1=Sophia Manoulian |title=Images Of The Annunciation Of The Virgin Mary Of The 13th, 14th And 15th Century | date=1991}}</ref>
In paintings, Mary is traditionally portrayed in [[Marian blue|blue]]. This tradition can trace its origin to the Byzantine Empire, from {{circa|500}} AD, where blue was "the colour of an empress". A more practical explanation for the use of this colour is that in Medieval and Renaissance Europe, the blue pigment was derived from the rock [[lapis lazuli]], a stone of greater value than gold, which was imported from Afghanistan. Beyond a painter's retainer, patrons were expected to purchase any gold or lapis lazuli to be used in the painting. Hence, it was an expression of devotion and glorification to swathe the Virgin in gowns of blue. Transformations in visual depictions of Mary from the 13th to 15th centuries mirror her "social" standing within the Church and in society.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kugeares |first1=Sophia Manoulian |title=Images Of The Annunciation Of The Virgin Mary Of The 13th, 14th And 15th Century | date=1991}}</ref>
 
Traditional representations of Mary include the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|crucifixion]] scene, called {{lang|la|[[Stabat Mater (art)|Stabat Mater]]}}.<ref>de Bles, Arthur. ''How to Distinguish the Saints in Art by Their Costumes, Symbols and Attributes'', 2004 {{ISBN|1-4179-0870-X}} p. 35</ref><ref>Jameson, Anna. ''Legends of the Madonna: as represented in the fine arts''. 2006 {{ISBN|1-4286-3499-1}} p. 37</ref> While not recorded in the Gospel accounts, Mary cradling the dead body of her son is a common motif in art, called a "[[pietà]]" or "pity".


Traditional representations of Mary include the [[crucifixion]] scene, called {{lang|la|[[Stabat Mater (art)|Stabat Mater]]}}.<ref>de Bles, Arthur. ''How to Distinguish the Saints in Art by Their Costumes, Symbols and Attributes'', 2004 {{ISBN|1-4179-0870-X}} p. 35</ref><ref>Jameson, Anna. ''Legends of the Madonna: as represented in the fine arts''. 2006 {{ISBN|1-4286-3499-1}} p. 37</ref> While not recorded in the Gospel accounts, Mary cradling the dead body of her son is a common motif in art, called a "[[pietà]]" or "pity".
In the Egyptian, Eritrean, and Ethiopian tradition, Mary has been portrayed in story and paint for centuries.<ref>Chojnacki, Stanisław. 1977. "Note on the Early Imagery of the Virgin Mary in Ethiopia."&nbsp;Ethnologische Zeitschrift 3: 5–41.</ref> Beginning in the 1600s, however, highland Ethiopians began portraying Mary performing a variety of miracles for the faithful, including paintings of her giving water to a thirsty dog, healing monks with her breast milk, and saving a man eaten by a crocodile.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Belcher |first=Wendy |date=6 October 2023 |title=The African Library of Paintings of the Virgin Mary |url=https://pemm.princeton.edu/research/research-and-lessons/16 |access-date=22 April 2024 |website=Princeton Ethiopian, Eritrean, and Egyptian Miracles of Mary (PEMM) project}}</ref> Over 1,000 such [https://pemm.princeton.edu/stories stories] about her exist in this tradition, and about one hundred of those have hundreds of paintings each, in various manuscripts, adding up to thousands of [https://pemm.princeton.edu/paintings paintings].<ref>Brown, Jeremy, Mehari Worku, Dawit Muluneh, and Evgeniia Lambrinaki. 2023. "The Ethiopian Stories about the Miracles of the Virgin Mary (Täˀammərä Maryam)." In Ethiopia at the Crossroads: Exhibition Catalogue, edited by Christine Sciacca. Baltimore, MD: Walters Art Museum.</ref>


{{For|a larger gallery|Commons:Madonna structured gallery}}
{{For|a larger gallery|Commons:Madonna structured gallery}}
Line 414: Line 435:
File:Flight into Egypt - Capella dei Scrovegni - Padua 2016.jpg|''[[Flight into Egypt]]'' by [[Giotto]] {{circa|1304}}
File:Flight into Egypt - Capella dei Scrovegni - Padua 2016.jpg|''[[Flight into Egypt]]'' by [[Giotto]] {{circa|1304}}
File:Pietro lorenzetti, compianto (dettaglio) basilica inferiore di assisi (1310-1329).jpg|''[[Lamentation of Christ|Lamentation]]'' by [[Pietro Lorenzetti]], [[Assisi]] Basilica, {{circa|1310–1329}}
File:Pietro lorenzetti, compianto (dettaglio) basilica inferiore di assisi (1310-1329).jpg|''[[Lamentation of Christ|Lamentation]]'' by [[Pietro Lorenzetti]], [[Assisi]] Basilica, {{circa|1310–1329}}
File:Ethiopia-Axum Cathedral-fresco-Black Madonna.JPG|[[Black Madonna]] and Child, [[Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion]], [[Axum]], [[Ethiopia]]
File:Ethiopia-Axum Cathedral-fresco-Black Madonna.JPG|[[Black Madonna]] and Child, [[Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion]], [[Axum]], Ethiopia
File:Chinese Madonna. St. Francis' Church, Macao.jpg|Chinese Madonna, St. Francis' Church, [[Macau|Macao]]
File:Chinese Madonna. St. Francis' Church, Macao.jpg|Chinese Madonna, St. Francis' Church, [[Macau|Macao]]
File:Michelangelo's Pieta 5450 cropncleaned edit.jpg|[[Michelangelo]]'s ''[[Pietà (Michelangelo)|Pietà]]'' (1498–99) in [[St. Peter's Basilica]], [[Vatican City]]
File:Michelangelo's Pieta 5450 cropncleaned edit.jpg|[[Michelangelo]]'s ''[[Pietà (Michelangelo)|Pietà]]'' (1498–99) in [[St. Peter's Basilica]], [[Vatican City]]
File:DARET Jacques Visitation.jpg|''[[Visitation (Christianity)|Visitation]]'', from the [[Abbey of St. Vaast|St Vaast]] Altarpiece by [[Jacques Daret]], 1434–1435
File:DARET Jacques Visitation.jpg|''[[Visitation (Christianity)|Visitation]]'', from the [[Abbey of St. Vaast|St Vaast]] Altarpiece by [[Jacques Daret]], 1434–1435
File:Virgen de guadalupe1.jpg|''[[Our Lady of Guadalupe|Virgin of Guadalupe]]'', from the [[Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe]], [[Mexico City]], 16th century
File:Virgen de guadalupe1.jpg|''[[Our Lady of Guadalupe|Virgin of Guadalupe]]'', from the [[Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe]], [[Mexico City]], 16th century
File:Our Lady of La Naval de Manila.jpg|[[Our Lady of La Naval de Manila]] statue in [[Quezon City]], [[Philippines]], {{circa|1593}}
File:Our Lady of La Naval de Manila.jpg|[[Our Lady of La Naval de Manila]] statue in [[Quezon City]], Philippines, {{circa|1593}}
File:Rubens Madonna on Floral Wreath.jpg|''Madonna on Floral Wreath'' by [[Peter Paul Rubens]] with [[Jan Brueghel the Elder]], {{circa|1619}}
File:Rubens Madonna on Floral Wreath.jpg|''Madonna on Floral Wreath'' by [[Peter Paul Rubens]] with [[Jan Brueghel the Elder]], {{circa|1619}}
File:Peter Paul Rubens 009.jpg|''[[Adoration of the Magi]]'', [[Rubens]], 1634
File:Peter Paul Rubens 009.jpg|''[[Adoration of the Magi]]'', [[Rubens]], 1634
Line 446: Line 467:
* ''[[The Last Temptation of Christ (film)|The Last Temptation of Christ]]'' (1988 film), played by [[Verna Bloom]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=blepPjQL9I0C&pg=PA57 |title=Hollywood Under Siege: Martin Scorsese, the Religious Right, and the Culture Wars |first=Thomas |last=Lindlof |publisher=[[University Press of Kentucky]] |date=2008 |page=57 |isbn=978-0813173160 |access-date=20 August 2019 |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417214201/https://books.google.com/books?id=blepPjQL9I0C&pg=PA57 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[The Last Temptation of Christ (film)|The Last Temptation of Christ]]'' (1988 film), played by [[Verna Bloom]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=blepPjQL9I0C&pg=PA57 |title=Hollywood Under Siege: Martin Scorsese, the Religious Right, and the Culture Wars |first=Thomas |last=Lindlof |publisher=[[University Press of Kentucky]] |date=2008 |page=57 |isbn=978-0813173160 |access-date=20 August 2019 |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417214201/https://books.google.com/books?id=blepPjQL9I0C&pg=PA57 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Mary, Mother of Jesus (film)|Mary, Mother of Jesus]]'' (1999 television film), played by [[Pernilla August]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3GDnyI3GLMEC&pg=PA5 |title=The Celluloid Madonna: From Scripture to Screen |first=Catherine |last=O'Brien |author-link=Catherine O'Brien (film scholar) |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |year=2011 |page=5 |isbn=978-1906660284 |access-date=20 August 2019 |archive-date=18 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818162347/https://books.google.com/books?id=3GDnyI3GLMEC&pg=PA5 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Mary, Mother of Jesus (film)|Mary, Mother of Jesus]]'' (1999 television film), played by [[Pernilla August]].<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3GDnyI3GLMEC&pg=PA5 |title=The Celluloid Madonna: From Scripture to Screen |first=Catherine |last=O'Brien |author-link=Catherine O'Brien (film scholar) |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |year=2011 |page=5 |isbn=978-1906660284 |access-date=20 August 2019 |archive-date=18 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210818162347/https://books.google.com/books?id=3GDnyI3GLMEC&pg=PA5 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Saint Mary (film)|Saint Mary]]'' (2002 film), played by [[Shabnam Gholikhani]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.ifilmtv.com/news/content/6989/saint-mary-female-lead-shabnam-gholikhani-talks-with-ifilm |title='Saint Mary' female lead Shabnam Gholikhani talks with ifilm |date=18 December 2017 |access-date=10 April 2019 |work=[[iFilm (TV channel)|iFilm]] |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417205618/https://en.ifilmtv.com/news/content/6989/saint-mary-female-lead-shabnam-gholikhani-talks-with-ifilm |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Saint Mary (film)|Saint Mary]]'' (2001 film), played by [[Shabnam Gholikhani]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.ifilmtv.com/news/content/6989/saint-mary-female-lead-shabnam-gholikhani-talks-with-ifilm |title='Saint Mary' female lead Shabnam Gholikhani talks with ifilm |date=18 December 2017 |access-date=10 April 2019 |work=[[iFilm (TV channel)|iFilm]] |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417205618/https://en.ifilmtv.com/news/content/6989/saint-mary-female-lead-shabnam-gholikhani-talks-with-ifilm |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[The Passion of the Christ]]'' (2004 film), played by [[Maia Morgenstern]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/actress_who_plays_mary_speaks_of_filming_the_passion |title=Actress who plays Mary speaks of filming 'The Passion' |date=6 February 2004 |access-date=10 April 2019 |work=[[Catholic News Agency]] |first=JD |last=Flynn |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308072555/https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/actress_who_plays_mary_speaks_of_filming_the_passion |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[The Passion of the Christ]]'' (2004 film), played by [[Maia Morgenstern]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/599/actress-who-plays-mary-speaks-of-filming-the-passion |title=Actress who plays Mary speaks of filming 'The Passion' |date=6 February 2004 |access-date=10 April 2019 |work=[[Catholic News Agency]] |first=JD |last=Flynn |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308072555/https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/actress_who_plays_mary_speaks_of_filming_the_passion |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Imperium: Saint Peter]]'' (2005 television film), played by [[Lina Sastri]].
* ''[[Imperium: Saint Peter]]'' (2005 television film), played by [[Lina Sastri]].
* ''[[Color of the Cross]]'' (2006 film), played by [[Debbi Morgan]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/What-race-was-Jesus-Color-of-the-Cross-puts-a-2547475.php |title=What race was Jesus? 'Color of the Cross' puts a different face on the debate. |first=Jason B. |last=Johnson |date=7 November 2006 |access-date=10 April 2019 |newspaper=[[SFGate]] |publisher=[[Hearst Communications, Inc.]] |archive-date=18 November 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091118175612/https://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2006%2F11%2F07%2FDDG0VM628B1.DTL |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Color of the Cross]]'' (2006 film), played by [[Debbi Morgan]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/What-race-was-Jesus-Color-of-the-Cross-puts-a-2547475.php |title=What race was Jesus? 'Color of the Cross' puts a different face on the debate. |first=Jason B. |last=Johnson |date=7 November 2006 |access-date=10 April 2019 |newspaper=[[SFGate]] |publisher=[[Hearst Communications, Inc.]] |archive-date=18 November 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091118175612/https://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2006%2F11%2F07%2FDDG0VM628B1.DTL |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 455: Line 476:
* ''[[Mary of Nazareth (film)|Mary of Nazareth]]'' (2012 film), played by [[Alissa Jung]].
* ''[[Mary of Nazareth (film)|Mary of Nazareth]]'' (2012 film), played by [[Alissa Jung]].
* ''[[Son of God (film)|Son of God]]'' (2014 film), played by [[Roma Downey]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www1.cbn.com/roma-downey-and-diogo-morgado-faith-and-filming-son-god |title=Roma Downey and Diogo Morgado on Faith and Filming Son of God |first=Hannah |last=Goodwyn |work=[[The Christian Broadcasting Network]], Inc. |access-date=10 April 2019 |year=2014 |archive-date=1 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210501030350/https://www1.cbn.com/roma-downey-and-diogo-morgado-faith-and-filming-son-god |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Son of God (film)|Son of God]]'' (2014 film), played by [[Roma Downey]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www1.cbn.com/roma-downey-and-diogo-morgado-faith-and-filming-son-god |title=Roma Downey and Diogo Morgado on Faith and Filming Son of God |first=Hannah |last=Goodwyn |work=[[The Christian Broadcasting Network]], Inc. |access-date=10 April 2019 |year=2014 |archive-date=1 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210501030350/https://www1.cbn.com/roma-downey-and-diogo-morgado-faith-and-filming-son-god |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[The Chosen (TV series)|The Chosen]]'' (2017 TV series), played by [[Vanessa Benavente]].
* ''[[Mary Magdalene (2018 film)|Mary Magdalene]]'' (2018 film), played by Irit Sheleg.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.irishnews.com/arts/2018/03/14/news/mary-magdalene-attempts-to-wash-away-biblical-character-s-stains-of-ill-repute-1276541/ |title=Mary Magdalene attempts to wash away biblical character's stains of ill repute |date=14 March 2018 |access-date=10 April 2019 |newspaper=[[Irish News]] |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308053802/https://www.irishnews.com/arts/2018/03/14/news/mary-magdalene-attempts-to-wash-away-biblical-character-s-stains-of-ill-repute-1276541/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Mary Magdalene (2018 film)|Mary Magdalene]]'' (2018 film), played by Irit Sheleg.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.irishnews.com/arts/2018/03/14/news/mary-magdalene-attempts-to-wash-away-biblical-character-s-stains-of-ill-repute-1276541/ |title=Mary Magdalene attempts to wash away biblical character's stains of ill repute |date=14 March 2018 |access-date=10 April 2019 |newspaper=[[Irish News]] |archive-date=8 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308053802/https://www.irishnews.com/arts/2018/03/14/news/mary-magdalene-attempts-to-wash-away-biblical-character-s-stains-of-ill-repute-1276541/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Jesus: His Life]]'' (2019 TV series), played by [[Houda Echouafni]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://nypost.com/2019/03/20/jesus-his-life-dispels-beliefs-about-christ-and-biblical-history/ |title='Jesus: His Life' dispels beliefs about Christ and biblical history |first=Robert |last=Rorke |date=20 March 2019 |access-date=10 April 2019 |newspaper=[[NY Post]] |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417204333/https://nypost.com/2019/03/20/jesus-his-life-dispels-beliefs-about-christ-and-biblical-history/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Jesus: His Life]]'' (2019 TV series), played by [[Houda Echouafni]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://nypost.com/2019/03/20/jesus-his-life-dispels-beliefs-about-christ-and-biblical-history/ |title='Jesus: His Life' dispels beliefs about Christ and biblical history |first=Robert |last=Rorke |date=20 March 2019 |access-date=10 April 2019 |newspaper=[[NY Post]] |archive-date=17 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417204333/https://nypost.com/2019/03/20/jesus-his-life-dispels-beliefs-about-christ-and-biblical-history/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* ''[[Fatima (2020 film)|Fatima]]'' (2020 film), played by [[Joana Ribeiro]].
* ''[[Fatima (2020 film)|Fatima]]'' (2020 film), played by [[Joana Ribeiro]].
* ''[[Mary (2024 film)|Mary]]'' (2024 film), played by [[Noa Cohen]].


{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}
Line 469: Line 492:


==See also==
==See also==
{{Portal|Catholicism|Christianity}}
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[Acts of Reparation to the Virgin Mary]]
* [[Acts of Reparation to the Virgin Mary]]
Line 474: Line 498:
* [[History of Catholic Mariology]]
* [[History of Catholic Mariology]]
* [[Holy Name of Mary]]
* [[Holy Name of Mary]]
* [[Madonna (art)]]
* [[Hymns to Mary]]
* [[Marian and Holy Trinity columns]]
* [[Marian and Holy Trinity columns]]
* [[Marian apparition]]
* [[Maryamaweet]]
* [[May crowning]]
* [[May crowning]]
* [[Miraculous births]]
* [[Miriai]]; Mandaean heroine that many equate with Mary
* [[Miriai]]; Mandaean heroine that many equate with Mary
* [[Mother of the Church]]
* [[New Testament people named Mary]]
* [[New Testament people named Mary]]
* [[Shrines to the Virgin Mary]]
* [[Shrines to the Virgin Mary]]
* [[Society of Mary (Marianists)]]
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}
<!-- please keep entries in alphabetical order -->
<!-- please keep entries in alphabetical order -->
Line 501: Line 520:
*{{cite book|title=The Glories of Mary, Mother of God. Translated from the Italian|year=1833|url=https://www.ecatholic2000.com/liguori/glories.shtml|first=Alphonsus|last=Liguori|author-link=Alphonsus Liguori|publisher=Dublin: John Coyne}}
*{{cite book|title=The Glories of Mary, Mother of God. Translated from the Italian|year=1833|url=https://www.ecatholic2000.com/liguori/glories.shtml|first=Alphonsus|last=Liguori|author-link=Alphonsus Liguori|publisher=Dublin: John Coyne}}
*{{cite book|chapter=[[s:Beautiful pearls of Catholic truth/Life of the Blessed Virgin Mary.|Life of the Blessed Virgin Mary.]]|title=Beautiful pearls of Catholic truth|year=1897|publisher=Henry Sphar & Co.|first=Bernard|last=O'Reilly|author-link=Bernard O'Reilly (historian)}}
*{{cite book|chapter=[[s:Beautiful pearls of Catholic truth/Life of the Blessed Virgin Mary.|Life of the Blessed Virgin Mary.]]|title=Beautiful pearls of Catholic truth|year=1897|publisher=Henry Sphar & Co.|first=Bernard|last=O'Reilly|author-link=Bernard O'Reilly (historian)}}
* Pelikan, Jaroslav. ''Mary Through the Centuries: Her Place in the History of Culture'', [https://www.yale.edu/yup/ Yale University Press], 1998, hardcover, 240 pp. {{ISBN?}}
*{{cite book|title=Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption|year=2003|last=Shoemaker|first=Stephen|author-link=Stephen J. Shoemaker|url=https://academic.oup.com/book/27239|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=9780191600746}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Sister project links |wikt=Virgin Mary |commons=Virgin Mary |b=no |n=no |q=Mary, mother of Jesus |s=Author:Mary of Nazareth |v=Angel oracle#8 Mother Mary |species=no |voy=no }}
{{Sister project links |wikt=Virgin Mary |commons=Virgin Mary |b=no |n=no |q=Mary, mother of Jesus |s=Author:Mary of Nazareth |v=Angel oracle#8 Mother Mary |species=no |voy=no }}
* [https://www.mariologicalsociety.com/ Marilogical Society of America]
* [https://mariologicalsociety.com Mariological Society of America]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20091017234855/https://campus.udayton.edu/mary/aboutmary2.html University of Dayton – The Mary Page]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20161110164434/https://www.churchfathers.org/category/mary-and-the-saints/mary-without-sin/ Church Fathers on the Sinless Nature of Mary]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20161110164434/https://www.churchfathers.org/category/mary-and-the-saints/mary-without-sin/ Church Fathers on the Sinless Nature of Mary]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20161116120838/https://www.churchfathers.org/category/mary-and-the-saints/mary-ever-virgin/ Church Fathers on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20161116120838/https://www.churchfathers.org/category/mary-and-the-saints/mary-ever-virgin/ Church Fathers on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary]
* [https://www.christians.eu/mary/ Mary] (Biblical perspective)
* [https://www.christians.eu/mary/ Mary] (Biblical perspective)
* [https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_p-vi_exh_19740202_marialis-cultus_en.html Apostolic exhortation of Paul VI. ''Marialis Cultus'']
* [https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_p-vi_exh_19740202_marialis-cultus_en.html Apostolic exhortation of Paul VI. ''Marialis Cultus'']
{{Virgin Mary}}
{{Jesus footer}}
{{Nativity of Jesus}}
{{Christmas}}
{{New Testament people|prophets}}
{{Gospel of Matthew}}
{{Gospel of Mark}}
{{Gospel of Luke}}
{{Gospel of John}}
{{Madonna styles}}
{{Symbols of Georgia (country)}}
{{Christianity footer}}
{{Catholicism}}


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
Line 527: Line 559:
[[Category:Christianity and women]]
[[Category:Christianity and women]]
[[Category:Genealogy of Jesus]]
[[Category:Genealogy of Jesus]]
[[Category:Jewish refugees]]
[[Category:Followers of Jesus]]
[[Category:Followers of Jesus]]
[[Category:People from Nazareth]]
[[Category:People from Nazareth]]
[[Category:Prophets of the New Testament]]
[[Category:Saints from the Holy Land]]
[[Category:Saints from the Holy Land]]
[[Category:Women in the New Testament]]
[[Category:Women in the New Testament]]
[[Category:The Three Marys]]
[[Category:The Three Marys]]
[[Category:Reputed virgins]]
[[Category:Tribe of Levi]]
[[Category:New Testament people named Mary]]
[[Category:Tribe of Judah]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of John]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of Luke]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of Matthew]]
[[Category:People in the Gospel of Mark]]
[[Category:People in Acts of the Apostles]]
[[Category:People in the Book of Revelation]]

Latest revision as of 00:22, 21 March 2026


Mary
Slightly faded painting of a woman wearing a black veil, staring out of the portrait. Her hands are raised. The image is on a gold background.
The Madonna del Rosario (c. 6th century or earlier), perhaps the oldest icon of Mary in Rome. Medieval tradition held that this icon was painted by Luke the Evangelist.
Bornc. 18 BC[lower-alpha 1]
DiedAfter c. 33 AD
Spouse(s)Joseph
ChildrenJesus
Parent(s)Joachim and Anne (according to some apocryphal writings)

Mary[lower-alpha 2] was a first-century Jewish woman of Nazareth,[9] the wife of Joseph and the mother of Jesus. She is an important figure of Christianity, venerated under various titles such as virgin or queen, many of which are mentioned in the Litany of Loreto. The Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Catholic, Evangelical Lutheran, Reformed, Anglican, Methodist and Baptist churches believe that Mary, as mother of Jesus, is the Mother of God. The Church of the East historically regarded her as Christotokos, a term still used in the liturgy of the Assyrian Church of the East.[10] She has the highest position in Islam among all women and is mentioned numerous times in the Quran, including in a chapter (surah) named after her.[11][12][13] She is also revered in the Baháʼí and Druze faiths.[14]

The synoptic Gospels name Mary as the mother of Jesus. The gospels of Matthew and Luke describe Mary as a virgin[lower-alpha 3] who was chosen by God to conceive Jesus through the Holy Spirit. After giving birth to Jesus in Bethlehem, she and her husband Joseph raised him in the city of Nazareth in Galilee, and she was in Jerusalem at his crucifixion and with the apostles after his ascension. Although her later life is not accounted in the Bible; Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and some Protestant traditions believe that her body was raised into heaven at the end of her earthly life, which is known in Western Christianity as the Assumption of Mary and in Eastern Christianity as the Dormition of the Mother of God.

Mary has been venerated since early Christianity,[18][19] and is often considered to be the holiest and greatest saint. There is a certain diversity in the Mariology and devotional practices of major Christian traditions. The Catholic Church and some Oriental Orthodox Churches hold distinctive Marian dogmas, namely her Immaculate Conception and her bodily assumption into heaven.[20] Many Protestants hold various views of Mary's role that they perceive as being in accordance with the Scriptures.[21][22] The Confessions of the Lutheran Churches have taught the virgin birth, Theotokos, and perpetual virginity.[23][24]

The multiple forms of Marian devotions include various prayers and hymns, the celebration of several Marian feast days in liturgy,[22] the veneration of images and relics, the construction of churches dedicated to her and pilgrimages to Marian shrines. Many Marian apparitions and miracles attributed to her intercession have been reported by believers over the centuries. She has been a traditional subject in arts, notably in Byzantine art, medieval art and Renaissance art.

Names and titles[edit | edit source]

Virgin and Child with angels and Sts. George and Theodore. Icon, c. 600, from Saint Catherine's Monastery.

Template:Mary

Mary's name in the original manuscripts of the New Testament was based on her original Aramaic name מרים‎, transliterated as Maryam or Mariam.[25] The English name Mary comes from the Greek Μαρία, a shortened form of the name Μαριάμ. Both Μαρία and Μαριάμ appear in the New Testament.

In Christianity[edit | edit source]

In Christianity, Mary is commonly referred to as the Virgin Mary, in accordance with the belief that the Holy Spirit impregnated her, thereby conceiving her first-born son Jesus miraculously, without sexual relations with her betrothed Joseph, "until her son [Jesus] was born".[26] The word "until" has inspired considerable analysis on whether Joseph and Mary produced siblings after the birth of Jesus or not.[lower-alpha 4] Among her many other names and titles are the Blessed Virgin Mary (often abbreviated to "BVM" after the Latin Beata Maria Virgo),[28] Saint Mary (occasionally), the Mother of God (primarily in Western Christianity), the Theotokos (primarily in Eastern Christianity), Our Lady (Medieval Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.), and Queen of Heaven (Regina caeli; see also here).[29][30] The title "queen of heaven" had previously been used as an epithet for a number of goddesses, such as Isis, or Ishtar.

Titles in use vary among Anglicans, Lutherans and other Protestants, as well as Mormons, Catholics, Orthodox and other Christians.

The three main titles for Mary used by the Orthodox are Theotokos (Θεοτόκος or "God-bearer"), Aeiparthenos (ἀειπαρθένος) which means ever-virgin, as confirmed in the Second Council of Constantinople in 553, and Panagia (Παναγία) meaning "all-holy".[31] Catholics use a wide variety of titles for Mary, and these titles have in turn given rise to many artistic depictions.

The title Theotokos, which means "God-bearer", was recognized at the Council of Ephesus in 431.[32][33] The direct equivalents of title in Latin are Deipara and Dei Genitrix, although the phrase is more often loosely translated into Latin as Mater Dei ("Mother of God"), with similar patterns for other languages used in the Latin Church. However, this same phrase in Greek (Μήτηρ Θεοῦ), in the abbreviated form ΜΡ ΘΥ, is an indication commonly attached to her image in Byzantine icons. The Council stated that the Church Fathers "did not hesitate to speak of the holy Virgin as the Mother of God".[34][35][36]

Some Marian titles have a direct scriptural basis. For instance, the title "Queen Mother" has been given to Mary, as she was the mother of Jesus, sometimes referred to as the "King of Kings" due to his ancestral descent from King David.[37][38][39][40][41] This is also based on the Hebrew tradition of the "Queen-Mother", the Gebirah or "Great Lady".[42][43] Other titles have arisen from reported miracles, special appeals, or occasions for calling on Mary.[lower-alpha 5]

In Islam[edit | edit source]

Virgin Mary depicted by Muslim painter Hossein Nuri

In Islam, Mary is known as Maryam (Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.), mother of Isa (عيسى بن مريم, ʿĪsā ibn Maryām, lit. 'Jesus, son of Mary'). She is often referred to by the honorific title "Sayyidatuna", meaning "Our Lady"; this title is in parallel to "Sayyiduna" ("Our Lord"), used for the prophets.[48] A related term of endearment is "Siddiqah",[49] meaning "she who confirms the truth" and "she who believes sincerely completely". Another title for Mary is "Qānitah", which signifies both constant submission to God and absorption in prayer and invocation in Islam.[50] She is also called "Tahira", meaning "one who has been purified" and representing her status as one of two humans in creation to not be touched by Satan at any point, the other being Jesus.[51] In the Quran, she is described both as "the daughter of Imran" and "the sister of Aaron" and Moses, alluding to Miriam from the Hebrew Bible.[52] However, the title of "the sister of Aaron" is confirmed to be metaphorical (which is a common figure of speech in Arabic) as per a Hadith from the Islamic prophet Muhammad explaining Mary was indeed named after Miriam.[53]

Life in ancient sources[edit | edit source]

The Annunciation by Eustache Le Sueur, an example of 17th century Marian art. The Angel Gabriel announces to Mary her pregnancy with Jesus and offers her white lilies.

New Testament[edit | edit source]

The canonical Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles are the primary sources of historical information about Mary.[54][55] They are almost contemporary sources, as the synoptic Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles are generally considered dating from around AD 66–90, while the gospel of John dates from AD 90–110. They provide limited information about Mary, as they primarily focus on the teaching of Jesus and on his apostles.[54] The historical reliability of the Gospels and historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles are subject to debate, as it was common practice in early Christian writings to mix historical facts with legendary stories.[54]

The earliest New Testament account of Mary is in the epistle to the Galatians, which was written before the gospels. She is referred to as "a woman" and is not named: "But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law" (Galatians 4:4).[55]

Mary is mentioned several times in the canonical Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles:

  • The Gospel of Luke mentions Mary the most often, identifying her by name twelve times, all of these in the infancy narrative (Luke 1:27–2:34).[56]
  • The Gospel of Matthew mentions her by name five times, four of these (1:16, 18, 20; 2:11)[57] in the infancy narrative and once (Matthew 13:55)[58] outside the infancy narrative.
  • The Gospel of Mark names her once (Mark 6:3)[59] and mentions Jesus' mother without naming her in Mark 3:31–32.[60]
  • The Gospel of John refers to the mother of Jesus twice, but never mentions her name. She is first seen at the wedding at Cana (John 2:1–12).[61] The second reference has her standing near the cross of Jesus together with Mary Magdalene, Mary of Clopas (or Cleophas), and her own sister (possibly the same as Mary of Clopas; the wording is semantically ambiguous), along with the "disciple whom Jesus loved" (John 19:25–26).[62] John 2:1–12[61] is the only text in the canonical gospels in which the adult Jesus has a conversation with Mary. He does not address her as "Mother" but as "Woman". In Koine Greek (the language that the Gospel of John was composed in), calling one's mother "Woman" was not disrespectful, and could even be tender.[63] Accordingly, some versions of the Bible translate it as "Dear woman".[64]
  • In the Acts of the Apostles, Mary and the brothers of Jesus are mentioned in the company of the eleven apostles who are gathered in the upper room after the Ascension of Jesus (Acts 1:14).[65]

In the Book of Revelation, also part of the New Testament, the "woman clothed with the sun" (Revelation 12:1, 12:5–6)[66] is sometimes identified as Mary.

Genealogy[edit | edit source]

The Virgin's first seven steps, mosaic from Chora Church, c. 12th century

The New Testament tells little of Mary's early history. The Gospel of Matthew gives a genealogy for Jesus by his father's paternal line, only identifying Mary as the wife of Joseph. John 19:25[67] states that Mary had a sister; semantically it is unclear if this sister is the same as Mary of Clopas, or if she is left unnamed. Jerome identifies Mary of Clopas as the sister of Mary, mother of Jesus.[68] According to the early 2nd century historian Hegesippus, Mary of Clopas was likely Mary's sister-in-law, understanding Clopas (Cleophas) to have been Joseph's brother.[69]

According to the writer of Luke, Mary was a relative of Elizabeth, wife of the priest Zechariah of the priestly division of Abijah, who was herself part of the lineage of Aaron and so of the Tribe of Levi.[70] Some of those who believe that the relationship with Elizabeth was on the maternal side, believe that Mary, like Joseph, was of the royal Davidic line and so of the Tribe of Judah, and that the genealogy of Jesus presented in Luke 3 from Nathan, is in fact the genealogy of Mary, while the genealogy from Solomon given in Matthew 1 is that of Joseph.[71][72][73] (Aaron's wife Elisheba was of the tribe of Judah, so all their descendants are from both Levi and Judah.)[74]

Annunciation[edit | edit source]

Mary resided in "her own house"[75] in Nazareth in Galilee, possibly with her parents, and during her betrothal—the first stage of a Jewish marriage. Jewish girls were considered marriageable at the age of twelve years and six months, though the actual age of the bride varied with circumstances. The marriage was preceded by the betrothal, after which the bride legally belonged to the bridegroom, though she did not live with him till about a year later, when the marriage was celebrated.[76]

The angel Gabriel announced to her that she was to be the mother of the promised Messiah by conceiving him through the Holy Spirit, and, after initially expressing incredulity at the announcement, she responded, "I am the handmaid of the Lord. Let it be done unto me according to your word."[77][lower-alpha 6] Joseph planned to quietly divorce her, but was told her conception was by the Holy Spirit in a dream by "an angel of the Lord"; the angel told him to not hesitate to take her as his wife, which Joseph did, thereby formally completing the wedding rites.[78][79]

Since the angel Gabriel had told Mary that Elizabeth—having previously been barren—was then miraculously pregnant,[80] Mary hurried to see Elizabeth, who was living with her husband Zechariah in "the hill country..., [in] a city of Juda". Mary arrived at the house and greeted Elizabeth who called Mary "the mother of my Lord", and Mary spoke the words of praise that later became known as the Magnificat from her first word in the Latin version.[81] After about three months, Mary returned to her own house.[82]

Birth of Jesus[edit | edit source]

The adoration of the shepherds, a nativity scene in France

According to the gospel of Luke, a decree of the Roman Emperor Augustus required that Joseph return to his hometown of Bethlehem to register for a Roman census.[lower-alpha 7] While he was there with Mary, she gave birth to Jesus; but because there was no place for them in the inn, she used a manger as a cradle.[84]:p.14[85] It is not told how old Mary was at the time of the Nativity,[86] but attempts have been made to infer it from the age of a typical Jewish mother of that time. Mary Joan Winn Leith represents the view that Jewish girls typically married soon after the onset of puberty,[87] while according to Amram Tropper, Jewish females generally married later in Palestine and the Western Diaspora than in Babylonia.[88] Some scholars hold the view that among them it typically happened between their mid and late teen years[89] or late teens and early twenties.[86][88] After eight days, the boy was circumcised according to Jewish law and named "Jesus" (ישוע, Yeshu'a), which means "Yahweh is salvation".[90]

After Mary continued in the "blood of her purifying" another 33 days, for a total of 40 days, she brought her burnt offering and sin offering to the Temple in Jerusalem (Luke 2:22),[91] so the priest could make atonement for her.[92] They also presented Jesus – "As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord" (Luke 2:23; Exodus 13:2; 23:12–15; 22:29; 34:19–20; Numbers 3:13; 18:15).[93] After the prophecies of Simeon and the prophetess Anna in Luke 2:25–38,[94] the family "returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth".[95]

According to the gospel of Matthew, magi coming from Eastern regions arrived at Bethlehem where Jesus and his family were living, and worshiped him. Joseph was then warned in a dream that King Herod wanted to murder the infant, and the family fled by night to Egypt and stayed there for some time. After Herod's death in 4 BC, they returned to Nazareth in Galilee, rather than Bethlehem, because Herod's son Archelaus was the ruler of Judaea.[96]

Mary is involved in the only event in Jesus' adolescent life that is recorded in the New Testament. At the age of 12, Jesus, having become separated from his parents on their return journey from the Passover celebration in Jerusalem, was found in the Temple among the religious teachers.[97]:p.210[98]

Ministry of Jesus[edit | edit source]

Stabat Mater by Gabriel Wuger, 1868

Mary was present when, at her suggestion, Jesus worked his first miracle during a wedding at Cana by turning water into wine.[99] Subsequently, there are events when Mary is mentioned along with the Jesus' brothers.[100] According to Epiphanius, Origen and Eusebius, these "brothers" would be sons of Joseph from a previous marriage. This view is still the official position of the Eastern Orthodox churches. Following Jerome, those would be actually Jesus' cousins, children of Mary's sister. This remains the official Roman Catholic position. For Helvidius, those would be full siblings of Jesus, born to Mary and Joseph after the firstborn Jesus. This has been the most common Protestant position.[101][102][103]

The hagiography of Mary and the Holy Family can be contrasted with other material in the Gospels. These references include an incident which can be interpreted as Jesus rejecting his family in the New Testament: "And his mother and his brothers arrived, and standing outside, they sent in a message asking for him ... And looking at those who sat in a circle around him, Jesus said, 'These are my mother and my brothers. Whoever does the will of God is my brother, and sister, and mother'."[104][105]

Mary is also depicted as being present in a group of women at the crucifixion standing near the disciple whom Jesus loved along with Mary of Clopas and Mary Magdalene,[62] to which list Matthew 27:56[106] adds "the mother of the sons of Zebedee", presumably the Salome mentioned in Mark 15:40.[107]

After the Ascension of Jesus[edit | edit source]

In Acts 1:12–26,[108] especially verse 14, Mary is the only one other than the eleven apostles to be mentioned by name who abode in the upper room, when they returned from Mount Olivet. Her presence with the apostles during the Pentecost is not explicit, although it has been held as a fact by Christian tradition.[109]

From this time, she disappears from the biblical accounts, although it is held by Catholics that she is again portrayed as the heavenly woman in the Book of Revelation.[110]

Her death is not recorded in the scriptures, but Orthodox tradition, tolerated also by Catholics, has her first dying a natural death, known as the Dormition of Mary,[111] and then, soon after, her body itself also being assumed (taken bodily) into Heaven. Belief in the corporeal assumption of Mary is a dogma of the Catholic Church, in the Latin and Eastern Catholic Churches alike, and is believed as well by the Eastern Orthodox Church,[112][113] the Oriental Orthodox Church, and parts of the Anglican Communion and Continuing Anglican movement.[114]

Apocryphal accounts and later writings[edit | edit source]

Some apocryphal texts add further narrative elements to the story of Mary, although scholars generally consider such texts to be historically mainly unreliable.[115] According to the Gospel of James, Mary was the daughter of Joachim and Anne. Before Mary's conception, Anne had been barren and was far advanced in years. Mary was given to service as a consecrated virgin in the Temple in Jerusalem when she was three years old.[116] This event is commemorated by some Christian churches as a liturgical feast, the Presentation of Mary, even though its premise conflicts with common understandings of Jewish culture and temple customs.[117] The Gospel of James also states that Mary was 12–14 years old at the time of her betrothal to Joseph[118] and that she was 16–17 during her pregnancy, according to most manuscripts.[119][120][1][121] According to ancient Jewish custom, Mary could have been betrothed at 12,[122] but some scholars hold the view that in Judea betrothal typically happened later.[86] The text underlines that the relationship between Mary and Joseph was a non-sexual social arrangement, and that Mary was dedicated to God. It emphasizes holiness of Mary and the virginal nature of her pregnancy.[123]

Although the canonical gospels contain no account of Mary's life after the resurrection, texts written centuries later provide some embellishment. The origin and authenticity of these details are unknown. The earliest extant biographical writing on Mary is Life of the Virgin, attributed to the 7th-century saint Maximus the Confessor, which portrays her as a key element of the early Christian Church after the death of Jesus.[124][125][126] Hyppolitus of Thebes, writing in the 7th or 8th century, says that Mary lived for 11 years after the death of her son, dying in 41 AD.[127]

Religious perspectives[edit | edit source]


Mary
Honored inChristianity, Islam, Druze faith[128]
CanonizedPre-Congregation
Major shrineSanta Maria Maggiore (See Marian shrines)
FeastSee Marian feast days
AttributesBlue mantle, crown of 12 stars, pregnant woman, roses, woman with child, woman trampling serpent, crescent moon, woman clothed with the sun, heart pierced by sword, rosary beads
PatronageSee Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary

Christian[edit | edit source]

Christian Marian perspectives include a great deal of diversity. While some Christians such as Catholics and Eastern Orthodox have well established Marian traditions, Protestants at large pay scant attention to Mariological themes. Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutherans and Anglicans venerate the Virgin Mary. This veneration especially takes the form of prayer for intercession with her Son, Jesus Christ. Additionally, it includes composing poems and songs in Mary's honor, painting icons or carving statues of her, and conferring titles on Mary that reflect her position among the saints.[30][31][129][130]

Catholic[edit | edit source]

In the Catholic Church, Mary is accorded the title "Blessed" (beata, μακάρια, makaria) in recognition of her assumption to Heaven and her capacity to intercede on behalf of those who pray to her. There is a difference between the usage of the term "blessed" as pertaining to Mary and its usage as pertaining to a beatified person. "Blessed" as a Marian title refers to her exalted state as being the greatest among the saints; for a person who has been declared beatified, on the other hand, "blessed" simply indicates that they may be venerated despite not being canonized. Catholic teachings make clear that Mary is not considered divine and prayers to her are not answered by her, but rather by God through her intercession.[131] The four Catholic dogmas regarding Mary are: her status as Theotokos, or Mother of God; her perpetual virginity; the Immaculate Conception; and her bodily Assumption into Heaven.[132][133][134]

The Blessed Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus has a more central role in Roman Catholic teachings and beliefs than in any other major Christian group. Not only do Roman Catholics have more theological doctrines and teachings that relate to Mary, but they have more feasts, prayers, devotional and venerative practices than any other group.[129] The Catechism of the Catholic Church states: "The Church's devotion to the Blessed Virgin is intrinsic to Christian worship."[135]

For centuries, Catholics have performed acts of consecration and entrustment to Mary at personal, societal and regional levels. These acts may be directed to the Virgin herself, to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and to the Immaculate Conception. In Catholic teachings, consecration to Mary does not diminish or substitute the love of God, but enhances it, for all consecration is ultimately made to God.[136][137]

Following the growth of Marian devotions in the 16th century, Catholic saints wrote books such as Glories of Mary and True Devotion to Mary that emphasized Marian veneration and taught that "the path to Jesus is through Mary".[138] Marian devotions are at times linked to Christocentric devotions (such as the Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary).[139]

Major Marian devotions include: Seven Sorrows of Mary, Rosary and scapular, Miraculous Medal and Reparations to Mary.[140][141] The months of May and October are traditionally "Marian months" for Roman Catholics; the daily rosary is encouraged in October and in May Marian devotions take place in many regions.[142][143][144] Popes have issued a number of Marian encyclicals and Apostolic Letters to encourage devotions to and the veneration of the Virgin Mary.

Catholics place high emphasis on Mary's roles as protector and intercessor and the Catechism refers to Mary as "honored with the title 'Mother of God', to whose protection the faithful fly in all their dangers and needs".[135][145][146][147][148] Key Marian prayers include: Ave Maria, Alma Redemptoris Mater, Sub tuum praesidium, Ave maris stella, Regina caeli, Ave Regina caelorum and the Magnificat.[149]

Mary's participation in the processes of salvation and redemption has also been emphasized in the Catholic tradition, but they are not doctrines.[150][151][152][153] Pope John Paul II's 1987 encyclical Redemptoris Mater began with the sentence: "The Mother of the Redeemer has a precise place in the plan of salvation."[154]

In the 20th century, both popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI emphasized the Marian focus of the Catholic Church. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) suggested a redirection of the whole church towards the program of Pope John Paul II in order to ensure an authentic approach to Christology via a return to the "whole truth about Mary,"[155] writing:

"It is necessary to go back to Mary if we want to return to that 'truth about Jesus Christ,' 'truth about the Church' and 'truth about man.'"[155]

There is significant diversity in the Marian doctrines attributed to her primarily by the Catholic Church. The key Marian doctrines held primarily in Catholicism can be briefly outlined as follows:

The acceptance of these Marian doctrines by Roman Catholics and other Christians can be summarized as follows:[21][157][158]

Doctrine Church action Accepted by
Virgin birth of Jesus First Council of Nicaea, 325 Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrians, Lutherans, Anglicans, Baptists and other Protestants
Mother of God First Council of Ephesus, 431 Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists, some Evangelicals.[159]
Perpetual Virginity Second Ecumenical Council of Constantinople, 553 Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrians, many Lutherans, some Anglicans[23][24][160]
Immaculate Conception Ineffabilis Deus encyclical
Pope Pius IX, 1854
Catholics, some Oriental Orthodox,[161][162] some Anglicans, some Lutherans (early Martin Luther)
Assumption of Mary Munificentissimus Deus encyclical
Pope Pius XII, 1950
Catholics, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox (only following her natural death), some Lutherans, some Anglicans

The title "Mother of God" (Theotokos) for Mary was confirmed by the First Council of Ephesus, held at the Church of Mary in 431. The Council decreed that Mary is the Mother of God because her son Jesus is one person who is both God and man, divine and human.[34] This doctrine is widely accepted by Christians in general, and the term "Mother of God" had already been used within the oldest known prayer to Mary, the Sub tuum praesidium, which dates to around 250 AD.[163][23][24]

Miraculous Icon of Our Lady of Tartaków in Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Łukawiec

The Virgin birth of Jesus was an almost universally held belief among Christians from the 2nd until the 19th century.[164] It is included in the two most widely used Christian creeds, which state that Jesus "was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary" (the Nicene Creed, in what is now its familiar form)[165] and the Apostles' Creed. The Gospel of Matthew describes Mary as a virgin who fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14,[166] The authors of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke consider Jesus' conception not the result of intercourse, and assert that Mary had "no relations with man" before Jesus' birth.[167] This alludes to the belief that Mary conceived Jesus through the action of God the Holy Spirit, and not through intercourse with Joseph or anyone else.[168]

The doctrines of the Assumption or Dormition of Mary relate to her death and bodily assumption to heaven. Roman Catholic Church has dogmatically defined the doctrine of the Assumption, which was done in 1950 by Pope Pius XII in Munificentissimus Deus. Whether Mary died or not is not defined dogmatically, however, although a reference to the death of Mary is made in Munificentissimus Deus. In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Assumption of the Virgin Mary is believed, and celebrated with her Dormition, where they believe she died.

Catholics believe in the Immaculate Conception of Mary, as proclaimed ex cathedra by Pope Pius IX in 1854, namely that she was filled with grace from the very moment of her conception in her mother's womb and preserved from the stain of original sin. The Latin Church has a liturgical feast by that name, kept on 8 December.[169] Orthodox Christians reject the Immaculate Conception dogma principally because their understanding of ancestral sin (the Greek term corresponding to the Latin "original sin") differs from the Augustinian interpretation and that of the Catholic Church.[170]

The Perpetual Virginity of Mary asserts Mary's real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made Man. The term Ever-Virgin (Greek ἀειπάρθενος) is applied in this case, stating that Mary remained a virgin for the remainder of her life, making Jesus her biological and only son, whose conception and birth are held to be miraculous.[132][168][171] The Orthodox Churches hold the position articulated in the Protoevangelium of James that Jesus' brothers and sisters were Joseph's children from a marriage prior to that of Mary, which had left him widowed. Roman Catholic teaching follows the Latin father Jerome in considering them Jesus' cousins.

Eastern Orthodox[edit | edit source]

A mosaic from the Hagia Sophia of Constantinople (modern Istanbul), depicting Mary with Jesus, flanked by John II Komnenos (left) and his wife Irene of Hungary (right), c. 1118 AD
15th century icon of the Theotokos ("God-bearer")

Eastern Orthodox Christianity includes a large number of traditions regarding the Ever-Virgin Mary, the Theotokos.[172] The Orthodox believe that she was and remained a virgin before and after Christ's birth.[31] The Theotokia (hymns to the Theotokos) are an essential part of the Divine Services in the Eastern Church and their positioning within the liturgical sequence effectively places the Theotokos in the most prominent place after Christ.[173] Within the Orthodox tradition, the order of the saints begins with: the Theotokos, Angels, Prophets, Apostles, Fathers and Martyrs, giving the Virgin Mary precedence over the angels. She is also proclaimed as the "Lady of the Angels".[173]

The views of the Church Fathers still play an important role in the shaping of Orthodox Marian perspective. However, the Orthodox views on Mary are mostly doxological, rather than academic: they are expressed in hymns, praise, liturgical poetry, and the veneration of icons. One of the most loved Orthodox Akathists (standing hymns) is devoted to Mary and it is often simply called the Akathist Hymn.[174] Five of the twelve Great Feasts in Orthodoxy are dedicated to Mary.[31] The Sunday of Orthodoxy directly links the Virgin Mary's identity as Mother of God with icon veneration.[175] A number of Orthodox feasts are connected with the miraculous icons of the Theotokos.[173]

(Panagía tou Páthous) Virgin of the Passion by Emmanuel Tzanfournaris, early 1600s

The Orthodox view Mary as "superior to all created beings", although not divine.[176] As such, the designation of Saint to Mary as Saint Mary is not appropriate.[177] The Orthodox does not venerate Mary as conceived immaculate. Gregory of Nazianzus, Archbishop of Constantinople in the 4th century AD, speaking on the Nativity of Jesus Christ argues that "Conceived by the Virgin, who first in body and soul was purified by the Holy Ghost, He came forth as God with that which He had assumed, One Person in two Natures, Flesh and Spirit, of which the latter defined the former."[178] The Orthodox celebrate the Dormition of the Theotokos, rather than Assumption.[31]

The Protoevangelium of James, an extra-canonical book, has been the source of many Orthodox beliefs on Mary. The account of Mary's life presented includes her consecration as a virgin at the temple at age three. The high priest Zachariah blessed Mary and informed her that God had magnified her name among many generations. Zachariah placed Mary on the third step of the altar, whereby God gave her grace. While in the temple, Mary was miraculously fed by an angel, until she was 12 years old. At that point, an angel told Zachariah to betroth Mary to a widower in Israel, who would be indicated. This story provides the theme of many hymns for the Feast of Presentation of Mary, and icons of the feast depict the story.[179] The Orthodox believe that Mary was instrumental in the growth of Christianity during the life of Jesus, and after his Crucifixion, and Orthodox theologian Sergei Bulgakov has written: "The Virgin Mary is the centre, invisible, but real, of the Apostolic Church."

Theologians from the Orthodox tradition have made prominent contributions to the development of Marian thought and devotion. John Damascene (c. 650 – c. 750) was one of the greatest Orthodox theologians. Among other Marian writings, he proclaimed the essential nature of Mary's heavenly Assumption or Dormition and her meditative role.

It was necessary that the body of the one who preserved her virginity intact in giving birth should also be kept incorrupt after death. It was necessary that she, who carried the Creator in her womb when he was a baby, should dwell among the tabernacles of heaven.[180]

From her we have harvested the grape of life; from her we have cultivated the seed of immortality. For our sake she became Mediatrix of all blessings; in her God became man, and man became God.[181]

More recently, Sergei Bulgakov expressed the Orthodox sentiments towards Mary as follows:[176]

Mary is not merely the instrument, but the direct positive condition of the Incarnation, its human aspect. Christ could not have been incarnate by some mechanical process, violating human nature. It was necessary for that nature itself to say for itself, by the mouth of the most pure human being: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it unto me according to Thy word."

Protestant[edit | edit source]

Stained glass window of Jesus leaving his mother, in a Lutheran church in South Carolina

Protestants in general reject the veneration and invocation of the Saints.[21]:1174 They share the belief that Mary is the mother of Jesus and "blessed among women" (Luke 1:42)[182] but they generally do not agree that Mary is to be venerated. She is considered to be an outstanding example of a life dedicated to God.[183] As such, they tend not to accept certain church doctrines such as her being preserved from sin.[184] Theologian Karl Barth wrote that "the heresy of the Catholic Church is its Mariology".[185]

Early Protestantism had high regard for Mary. Martin Luther wrote that: "Mary is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin. God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil."[186] John Calvin remarked, "It cannot be denied that God in choosing and destining Mary to be the Mother of his Son, granted her the highest honor."[lower-alpha 8] However, Calvin firmly rejected the notion that Mary can intercede between Christ and man.[189]

Although Calvin and Huldrych Zwingli honored Mary as the Mother of Christ in the 16th century, they did so less than Martin Luther.[190] Thus the idea of respect and high honor for Mary was not rejected by the first Protestants; however, they came to criticize the Roman Catholics for venerating Mary. Following the Council of Trent in the 16th century, as Marian veneration became associated with Catholics, Protestant interest in Mary decreased. During the Age of the Enlightenment, any residual interest in Mary within Protestant churches almost disappeared, although Anglicans and Lutherans continued to honor her.[21]

In the 20th century, some Protestants reacted in opposition to the Catholic dogma of the Assumption of Mary.[191] The tone of the Second Vatican Council began to mend the ecumenical differences, and Protestants began to show interest in Marian themes.[citation needed] In 1997 and 1998, ecumenical dialogues between Catholics and Protestants took place, but, to date, the majority of Protestants disagree with Marian veneration and some view it as a challenge to the authority of Scripture.[21][better source needed]

Lutheran[edit | edit source]
Mary with an inscription referencing Luke 1:46–47 in St. Jürgen (Lutheran) church in Gettorf (Schleswig-Holstein)

Evangelical-Lutheranism regards her as the Blessed Virgin Mary, with this codified in the Formula of Concord.[24][192] The Evangelical-Lutheran Churches celebrate several Marian feast days, including the Feast of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Feast of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary.[22] The Formula of Concord and the Smalcald Articles, upheld by the Lutheran Churches, teach the virgin birth, Theotokos and the perpetual virginity of Mary.[23][24] The Apology of the Augsburg Confession teaches that "blessed Mary prays for the Church".[193]

Theologians agree that Martin Luther adhered to the Marian decrees of the ecumenical councils and dogmas of the church. He held fast to the belief that Mary was a perpetual virgin and Mother of God.[194][195] Special attention is given to the assertion that Luther, some 300 years before the dogmatization of the Immaculate Conception by Pope Pius IX in 1854, was a firm adherent of that view.[citation needed] Others maintain that Luther in later years changed his position on the Immaculate Conception, which, at that time was undefined in the church, maintaining however the sinlessness of Mary throughout her life.[196][197] For Luther, early in his life, the Assumption of Mary was an understood fact, although he later stated that the Bible did not say anything about it and stopped celebrating its feast. Important to him was the belief that Mary and the saints do live on after death.[198][199][200] "Throughout his career as a priest-professor-reformer, Luther preached, taught, and argued about the veneration of Mary with a verbosity that ranged from childlike piety to sophisticated polemics. His views are intimately linked to his Christocentric theology and its consequences for liturgy and piety."[201] Luther, while revering Mary, came to criticize the "Papists" for blurring the line between high admiration of the grace of God wherever it is seen in a human being, and religious service given to another creature. He considered the Roman Catholic practice of celebrating saints' days and making intercessory requests addressed especially to Mary and other departed saints to be idolatry.[202][203] His final thoughts on Marian devotion and veneration are preserved in a sermon preached at Wittenberg only a month before his death:

Therefore, when we preach faith, that we should worship nothing but God alone, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, as we say in the Creed: 'I believe in God the Father almighty and in Jesus Christ,' then we are remaining in the temple at Jerusalem. Again,'This is my beloved Son; listen to him.' 'You will find him in a manger'. He alone does it. But reason says the opposite: What, us? Are we to worship only Christ? Indeed, shouldn't we also honor the holy mother of Christ? She is the woman who bruised the head of the serpent. Hear us, Mary, for thy Son so honors thee that he can refuse thee nothing. Here Bernard went too far in his Homilies on the Gospel: Missus est Angelus.[204] God has commanded that we should honor the parents; therefore I will call upon Mary. She will intercede for me with the Son, and the Son with the Father, who will listen to the Son. So you have the picture of God as angry and Christ as judge; Mary shows to Christ her breast and Christ shows his wounds to the wrathful Father. That's the kind of thing this comely bride, the wisdom of reason cooks up: Mary is the mother of Christ, surely Christ will listen to her; Christ is a stern judge, therefore I will call upon St. George and St. Christopher. No, we have been by God's command baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, just as the Jews were circumcised.[205][206]

Certain Lutheran churches such as the Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church venerate Mary and the saints in the same manner that Roman Catholics do, and hold all Marian dogmas as part of their faith.[207]

Anglican[edit | edit source]

The various churches that form the Anglican Communion and the Continuing Anglican movement have different views on Marian doctrines and venerative practices given that there is no single church with universal authority within the Communion and that the mother church (the Church of England) understands itself to be both "Catholic" and "Reformed".[208] The Anglican Communion includes segments which still retain some veneration of Mary.[130]

Mary's special position within God's purpose of salvation as "God-bearer" is recognized in a number of ways by some Anglican Christians.[209] All the member churches of the Anglican Communion affirm in the historic creeds that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, and celebrates the feast days of the Presentation of Christ in the Temple. This feast is called in older prayer books the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary on 2 February. The Annunciation of our Lord to the Blessed Virgin on 25 March was from before the time of Bede until the 18th century New Year's Day in England. The Annunciation is called the "Annunciation of our Lady" in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer. Anglicans also celebrate in the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin on 31 May, though in some provinces the traditional date of 2 July is kept. The feast of the St. Mary the Virgin is observed on the traditional day of the Assumption, 15 August. The Nativity of the Blessed Virgin is kept on 8 September.[130]

The Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary is kept in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer, on 8 December. In certain Anglican parishes of Anglo-Catholic churchmanship, this feast is called the Immaculate Conception. Again, the Assumption of Mary is believed in by most Anglo-Catholics, but is considered a pious opinion by moderate Anglicans. Reformed Anglicans reject the celebration of these feasts.[130]

Prayers and venerative practices vary greatly. For instance, as of the 19th century, following the Oxford Movement, Anglo-Catholics frequently pray the Rosary, the Angelus, Regina caeli, and other litanies and anthems of Mary reminiscent of Catholic practices.[210] Conversely, low church Anglicans rarely invoke the Blessed Virgin except in certain hymns, such as the second stanza of Ye Watchers and Ye Holy Ones.[209][211]

The Anglican Society of Mary was formed in 1931 and maintains chapters in many countries. The purpose of the society is to foster devotion to Mary among Anglicans.[130][212] High church Anglicans espouse doctrines that are closer to Roman Catholics, and retain veneration for Mary, such as Anglican pilgrimages to Our Lady of Lourdes, which have taken place since 1963, and pilgrimages to Our Lady of Walsingham, which have taken place for hundreds of years.[213]

Historically, there has been enough common ground between Roman Catholics and Anglicans on Marian issues that in 2005, a joint statement called Mary: grace and hope in Christ was produced through ecumenical meetings of Anglicans and Roman Catholic theologians. This document, informally known as the "Seattle Statement", is not formally endorsed by either the Catholic Church or the Anglican Communion, but is viewed by its authors as the beginning of a joint understanding of Mary.[130][214]

Methodist[edit | edit source]

Methodists do not have any additional teachings on the Virgin Mary except from what is mentioned in Scripture and the ecumenical Creeds. As such, Methodists generally accept the doctrine of the virgin birth, but reject the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.[215] John Wesley, the principal founder of the Methodist movement within the Church of England, believed that Mary "continued a pure and unspotted virgin", thus upholding the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary.[216][217] Contemporary Methodism holds that Mary was a virgin before, during, and immediately after the birth of Christ.[218][219] In addition, some Methodists also hold the doctrine of the Assumption of Mary as a pious opinion.[220]

Nontrinitarian[edit | edit source]

Nontrinitarians, such as Unitarians, Christadelphians, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Latter Day Saints[221] also acknowledge Mary as the biological mother of Jesus Christ, but most reject any immaculate conception and do not recognize Marian titles such as "Mother of God". The Latter Day Saint movement's view affirms the virgin birth of Jesus[222] and Christ's divinity, but only as a separate being than God the Father. The Book of Mormon refers to Mary by name in prophecies and describes her as "most beautiful and fair above all other virgins"[223] and as a "precious and chosen vessel."[224][225]

In nontrinitarian groups that are also Christian mortalists, Mary is not seen as an intercessor between humankind and Jesus, whom mortalists would consider "asleep", awaiting resurrection.[226]

Jewish[edit | edit source]

The issue of the parentage of Jesus in the Talmud also affects Jewish views of Mary. However, the Talmud does not mention Mary by name, and is considerate rather than only polemic.[227][228] The story about Panthera is also found in the Toledot Yeshu, the literary origins of which can not be traced with any certainty, and given that it is unlikely to go before the 4th century, the time is too late to include authentic remembrances of Jesus.[229] The Blackwell Companion to Jesus states that the Toledot Yeshu has no historical facts and was perhaps created as a tool for warding off conversions to Christianity.[230] The tales from the Toledot Yeshu did impart a negative picture of Mary to ordinary Jewish readers.[231] The circulation of the Toledot Yeshu was widespread among European and Middle Eastern Jewish communities since the 9th century.[232] The name Panthera may be a distortion of the term parthenos ("virgin") and Raymond E. Brown considers the story of Panthera a fanciful explanation of the birth of Jesus that includes very little historical evidence.[233] Robert Van Voorst states that because Toledot Yeshu is a medieval document with its lack of a fixed form and orientation towards a popular audience, it is "most unlikely" to have reliable historical information.[234] Stacks of the copies of the Talmud were burnt upon a court order after the 1240 Disputation for allegedly containing material defaming the character of Mary.[231]

Islamic[edit | edit source]

Persian miniature of Mary and Jesus

The Virgin Mary holds a singularly exalted place in Islam, and she is considered by the Quran to have been the greatest woman in the history of humankind. The Islamic scripture recounts the Divine Promise given to Mary as being: ""O Mary! Surely Allah has selected you, purified you, and chosen you over all women of the world" (Template:Qref).

Mary is often referred to by Muslims by the honorific title Sayedetina ("Our Lady"). She is mentioned in the Quran as the daughter of Imran.[235]

Moreover, Mary is the only woman named in the Quran and she is mentioned or referred to in the scripture a total of 50 times.[lower-alpha 9] Mary holds a singularly distinguished and honored position among women in the Quran. A sura (chapter) in the Quran is titled "Maryam" (Mary), the only sura in the Quran named after a woman, in which the story of Mary (Maryam) and Jesus (Isa) is recounted according to the view of Jesus in Islam.[13]

Birth[edit | edit source]

In a narration of hadith from Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq, he mentions that Allah revealed to Imran, "I will grant you a boy, blessed, one who will cure the blind and the leper and one who will raise the dead by My permission. And I will send him as an apostle to the Children of Israel." Then Imran related the story to his wife, Hannah, the mother of Mary. When she became pregnant, she conceived it was a boy, but when she gave birth to a girl, she stated "Oh my Lord! Verily I have delivered a female, and the male is not like the female, for a girl will not be a prophet," to which Allah replies in the Quran, "Allah knows better what has been delivered" (3:36). When Allah bestowed Jesus to Mary, he fulfilled his promise to Imran.[236]

Motherhood[edit | edit source]

Islamic miniature of Maryam in labor shaking a date palm, with Isa and hidden voice below

Mary was declared (uniquely along with Jesus) to be a "Sign of God" to humanity;[237] as one who "guarded her chastity";[50] an "obedient one";[50] and dedicated by her mother to Allah whilst still in the womb;[51] uniquely (amongst women) "Accepted into service by God";[238] cared for by (one of the prophets according to Islam) Zakariya (Zacharias);[238] that in her childhood she resided in the Temple and uniquely had access to Al-Mihrab (understood to be the Holy of Holies), and was provided with heavenly "provisions" by God.[238][235]

Mary is also called a "Chosen One";[239] a "Purified One";[239] a "Truthful one";[240] her child conceived through "a Word from God";[241] and "chosen you above the women of the worlds(the material and heavenly worlds)".[239]

The Quran relates detailed narrative accounts of Maryam (Mary) in two places, Template:Qref and Template:Qref. These state beliefs in both the Immaculate Conception of Mary and the virgin birth of Jesus.[242][243][244] The account given in Template:Qref is nearly identical with that in the Gospel according to Luke, and both of these (Luke, Sura 19) begin with an account of the visitation of an angel upon Zakariya (Zecharias) and "Good News of the birth of Yahya (John)", followed by the account of the annunciation. It mentions how Mary was informed by an angel that she would become the mother of Jesus through the actions of God alone.[245]

In the Islamic tradition, Mary and Jesus were the only children who could not be touched by Satan at the moment of their birth, for God imposed a veil between them and Satan.[246][247] According to the author Shabbir Akhtar, the Islamic perspective on Mary's Immaculate Conception is compatible with the Catholic doctrine of the same topic.

"O People of the Book! Do not go to extremes regarding your faith; say nothing about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger of Allah and the fulfilment of His Word through Mary and a spirit ˹created by a command˺ from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers and do not say, "Trinity." Stop!—for your own good. Allah is only One God. Glory be to Him! He is far above having a son! To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And Allah is sufficient as a Trustee of Affairs.

The Quran says that Jesus was the result of a virgin birth. The most detailed account of the annunciation and birth of Jesus is provided in Suras 3 and 19 of the Quran, where it is written that God sent an angel to announce that she could shortly expect to bear a son, despite being a virgin.[250]

Druze Faith[edit | edit source]

The icon of Saidet et Tallé, also known as "the Virgin of the Druze", is venerated by both the Druze and Christian communities in Lebanon.[14]

The Druze faith holds the Virgin Mary, known as Sayyida Maryam, in high regard.[128] Although the Druze religion is distinct from mainstream Islam and Christianity, it incorporates elements from both and honors many of their figures, including the Virgin Mary.[128] The Druze revere Mary as a holy and pure figure, embodying virtue and piety.[251][128] She is respected not only for her role as the mother of Messiah Jesus but also for her spiritual purity and dedication to God.[251][128] In regions where Druze and Christians coexist, such as parts of Lebanon, Syria and Israel, the veneration of Mary often reflects a blend of traditions.[252] Shared pilgrimage sites and mutual respect for places like the Church of Saidet et Tallé in Deir el Qamar,[253] the Our Lady of Lebanon shrine in Harrisa, the Our Lady of Saidnaya Monastery in Saidnaya, and the Stella Maris Monastery in Haifa exemplify this.[252]

Historical records and writings by authors like Pierre-Marie Martin and Glenn Bowman show that Druze leaders and community members have historically shown deep reverence for Marian sites.[14] They often sought her intercession before battles or during times of need, demonstrating a cultural and spiritual integration of Marian veneration into their religious practices.[14]

Bahá'í Faith[edit | edit source]

The Bahá'í Faith venerates Mary as the mother of Jesus. The Kitáb-i-Íqán, the primary theological work of the Bahá'í religion, describes Mary as "that most beauteous countenance," and "that veiled and immortal Countenance." The Bahá'í writings claim Jesus Christ was "conceived of the Holy Ghost"[254] and assert that in the Bahá'í Faith "the reality of the mystery of the Immaculacy of the Virgin Mary is confessed."[255]

Biblical scholars[edit | edit source]

The statement found in Matthew 1:25 that Joseph did not have sexual relations with Mary before she gave birth to Jesus has been debated among scholars, with some saying that she did not remain a virgin and some saying that she was a perpetual virgin.[256] Other scholars contend that the Greek word heos ("until") denotes a state up to a point, but does not mean that the state ended after that point, and that Matthew 1:25 does not confirm or deny the virginity of Mary after the birth of Jesus.[257][258][259] According to Biblical scholar Bart Ehrman, the Hebrew word almah, meaning young woman of childbearing age, was translated into Greek as parthenos, which often, though not always, refers to a young woman who has never had sexual intercourse. In Isaiah 7:14, it is commonly believed by Christians to be the prophecy of the Virgin Mary referred to in Matthew 1:23.[260] While Matthew and Luke give differing versions of the virgin birth, John quotes the uninitiated Philip and the disbelieving Jews gathered at Galilee referring to Joseph as Jesus' father.[261][262][263][264]

Other biblical verses have also been debated; for example, the reference made by Paul the Apostle that Jesus was made "of the seed of David according to the flesh" (Romans 1:3)[265] meaning that he was a descendant of David through Joseph.[266]

Pre-Christian Rome[edit | edit source]

From the early stages of Christianity, belief in the virginity of Mary and the virgin conception of Jesus, as stated in the gospels, holy and supernatural, was used by detractors, both political and religious, as a topic for discussions, debates, and writings, specifically aimed to challenge the divinity of Jesus and thus Christians and Christianity alike.[267] In the 2nd century, as part of his anti-Christian polemic The True Word, the pagan philosopher Celsus contended that Jesus was actually the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier named Panthera.[268] The Church Father Origen dismissed this assertion as a complete fabrication in his apologetic treatise Against Celsus.[269] How far Celsus sourced his view from Jewish sources remains a subject of discussion.[270]

Christian devotions[edit | edit source]

History[edit | edit source]

2nd century[edit | edit source]

Justin Martyr was among the first to draw a parallel between Eve and Mary. This derives from his comparison of Adam and Jesus. In his Dialogue with Trypho, written sometime between 155 and 167,[271] he explains:

He became man by the Virgin, in order that the disobedience which proceeded from the serpent might receive its destruction in the same manner in which it derived its origin. For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy, when the angel Gabriel announced the good tidings to her that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her, and the power of the Highest would overshadow her: wherefore also the Holy Thing begotten of her is the Son of God; and she replied, 'Be it unto me according to thy word." And by her has He been born, to whom we have proved so many scriptures refer, and by whom God destroys both the serpent and those angels and men who are like him; but works deliverance from death to those who repent of their wickedness and believe upon Him.[272]

It is possible that the teaching of Mary as the New Eve was part of the apostolic tradition rather than merely Justin Martyr's own creation, according to Serafim Seppälä.[273] Irenaeus, bishop of Lyon, also takes up this parallel, in Against Heresies, written about the year 182:[274]

In accordance with this design, Mary the Virgin is found obedient, saying, "Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to your word." Luke 1:38 But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. ... having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race; so also did Mary, having a man betrothed [to her], and being nevertheless a virgin, by yielding obedience, become the cause of salvation, both to herself and the whole human race. And on this account does the law term a woman betrothed to a man, the wife of him who had betrothed her, although she was as yet a virgin; thus indicating the back-reference from Mary to Eve,...For the Lord, having been born "the First-begotten of the dead," Revelation 1:5 and receiving into His bosom the ancient fathers, has regenerated them into the life of God, He having been made Himself the beginning of those that live, as Adam became the beginning of those who die. 1 Corinthians 15:20–22 Wherefore also Luke, commencing the genealogy with the Lord, carried it back to Adam, indicating that it was He who regenerated them into the Gospel of life, and not they Him. And thus also it was that the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what the virgin Eve had bound fast through unbelief, this did the virgin Mary set free through faith.[275]

During the second century, the Gospel of James was also written. According to Stephen J. Shoemaker, "its interest in Mary as a figure in her own right and its reverence for her sacred purity mark the beginnings of Marian piety within early Christianity".[276]

3rd to 5th centuries[edit | edit source]

During the Age of Martyrs and at the latest in the fourth century, the majority of the most essential ideas of Marian devotion already appeared in some form – in the writings of the Church Fathers, apocrypha and visual arts. The lack of sources makes it unclear whether the devotion to Mary played a role in liturgical use during the first centuries of Christianity.[277] In the 4th century, Marian devotion in a liturgical context becomes evident.[278]

The earliest known Marian prayer (the Sub tuum praesidium, or Beneath Thy Protection) is from the 3rd century (perhaps 270), and its text was rediscovered in 1917 on a papyrus in Egypt.[279][280] According to some sources, Theonas of Alexandria consecrated one of the first holy places dedicated to Mary during the late 3rd century. An even earlier place has been found in Nazareth, dated to the previous century by some scholars.[281] Following the Edict of Milan in 313, by the 5th century artistic images of Mary began to appear in public and larger churches were being dedicated to Mary, such as the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome.[282][283][284] At the Council of Ephesus in 431, Mary was officially declared the Theotokos, meaning "God-bearer"[285] or "Mother of God". The term had possibly been used for centuries[286] or at least since the early 300s, when it seems to have already been in established use.[287]

The Council of Ephesus was long thought to have been held at a church in Ephesus which had been dedicated to Mary about a hundred years before.[288][289][290] Though, recent archeological surveys indicate that St. Mary's Church in Ephesus did not exist at the time of the Council or, at least, the building was not dedicated to Mary before 500.[291] The Church of the Seat of Mary in Judea was built shortly after the introduction of Marian liturgy at the council of Ephesus, in 456, by a widow named Ikelia.[292]

According to the 4th-century heresiologist Epiphanius of Salamis, the Virgin Mary was worshipped as a mother goddess in the Christian sect of Collyridianism, which was found throughout Arabia sometime during the 300s AD. Collyridianism had women performing priestly acts, and made bread offerings to the Virgin Mary. The group was condemned as heretical by the Roman Catholic Church and was preached against by Epiphanius of Salamis, who wrote about the group in his writings titled Panarion.[293]

Byzantium[edit | edit source]

During the era of the Byzantine Empire, Mary was venerated as the virginal Mother of God and as an intercessor.[294]

Ephesus is a cultic centre of Mary, the site of the first church dedicated to her and the rumoured place of her death. Ephesus was previously a centre for worship of Artemis, a virgin goddess; the Temple of Artemis there is regarded as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. The cult of Mary was furthered by Queen Theodora in the 6th century.[295][296] According to William E. Phipps, in the book Survivals of Roman Religion,[297] "Gordon Laing argues convincingly that the worship of Artemis as both virgin and mother at the grand Ephesian temple contributed to the veneration of Mary."[298]

Middle Ages[edit | edit source]

Madonna of humility by Fra Angelico, c. 1430. A traditional depiction of Mary wearing blue clothes.

The Middle Ages saw many legends about Mary, her parents, and even her grandparents.[299] Mary's popularity increased dramatically from the 12th century,[300] linked to the Roman Catholic Church's designation of Mary as Mediatrix.[301][302]

Post-Reformation[edit | edit source]

Our Lady of Sorrows by Giovanni Battista Salvi da Sassoferrato, 17th century

Over the centuries, devotion and veneration to Mary has varied greatly among Christian traditions. For instance, while Protestants show scant attention to Marian prayers or devotions, of all the saints whom the Orthodox venerate, the most honored is Mary, who is considered "more honorable than the Cherubim and more glorious than the Seraphim".[31]

Orthodox theologian Sergei Bulgakov wrote: "Love and veneration for the Virgin is the soul of Orthodox piety. A faith in Christ which does not include [...] His mother is another faith, another Christianity from that of the Orthodox Church."[176]

Although the Catholics and the Orthodox may honor and venerate Mary, they do not view her as divine, nor do they worship her. Roman Catholics view Mary as subordinate to Christ, but uniquely so, in that she is seen as above all other creatures.[303] Similarly, Bulgakov wrote that the Orthodox view Mary as "superior to all created beings" and "ceaselessly pray for her intercession". However, she is not considered a "substitute for the One Mediator" who is Christ.[176] "Let Mary be in honor, but let worship be given to the Lord", he wrote.[304] Similarly, Catholics do not worship Mary as a divine being, but rather "hyper-venerate" her. In Roman Catholic theology, the term hyperdulia is reserved for Marian veneration, latria for the worship of God, and dulia for the veneration of other saints and angels.[305] The definition of the three level hierarchy of latria, hyperdulia and dulia goes back to the Second Council of Nicaea in 787.[306]

Devotions to artistic depictions of Mary vary among Christian traditions. There is a long tradition of Catholic Marian art and no image permeates Catholic art as does the image of Madonna and Child.[307] The icon of the Virgin Theotokos with Christ is, without doubt, the most venerated icon in the Orthodox Church.[308] Both Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians venerate images and icons of Mary, given that the Second Council of Nicaea in 787 permitted their veneration with the understanding that those who venerate the image are venerating the reality of the person it represents,[309] and the 842 Synod of Constantinople confirming the same.[310] According to Orthodox piety and traditional practice, however, believers ought to pray before and venerate only flat, two-dimensional icons, and not three-dimensional statues.[311]

The Anglican position towards Mary is in general more conciliatory than that of Protestants at large and in a book he wrote about praying with the icons of Mary, Rowan Williams, former archbishop of Canterbury, said: "It is not only that we cannot understand Mary without seeing her as pointing to Christ; we cannot understand Christ without seeing his attention to Mary."[130][312]

On 4 September 1781, 11 families of pobladores arrived from the Gulf of California and established a city in the name of King Carlos III. The small town was named El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora de los Ángeles de la Porciúncula (after our Lady of the Angels), a city that today is known simply as Los Angeles. In an attempt to revive the custom of religious processions within the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, in September 2011 the Queen of Angels Foundation, and founder Mark Anchor Albert, inaugurated an annual Grand Marian Procession in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles' historic core. This yearly procession, held on the last Saturday of August and intended to coincide with the anniversary of the founding of the City of Los Angeles, begins at the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels and concludes at the parish of La Iglesia de Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles which is part of the Los Angeles Plaza Historic District, better known as "La Placita".[313][314]

Feasts[edit | edit source]

The earliest feasts that relate to Mary grew out of the cycle of feasts that celebrated the Nativity of Jesus. Given that according to the Gospel of Luke (Luke 2:22–40),[315] 40 days after the birth of Jesus, along with the Presentation of Jesus at the Temple, Mary was purified according to Jewish customs. The Feast of the Purification began to be celebrated by the 5th century, and became the "Feast of Simeon" in Byzantium.[316]

Village decorations during the Feast of the Assumption in Għaxaq, Malta

In the 7th and 8th centuries, four more Marian feasts were established in Eastern Christianity. In the West, a feast dedicated to Mary, just before Christmas was celebrated in the Churches of Milan and Ravenna in Italy in the 7th century. The four Roman Marian feasts of Purification, Annunciation, Assumption and Nativity of Mary were gradually and sporadically introduced into England by the 11th century.[316]

Over time, the number and nature of feasts (and the associated Titles of Mary) and the venerative practices that accompany them have varied a great deal among diverse Christian traditions. Overall, there are significantly more titles, feasts and venerative Marian practices among Roman Catholics than any other Christians traditions.[129] Some such feasts relate to specific events, such as the Feast of Our Lady of Victory, based on the 1571 victory of the Papal States in the Battle of Lepanto.[317][318]

Differences in feasts may also originate from doctrinal issues—the Feast of the Assumption is such an example. Given that there is no agreement among all Christians on the circumstances of the death, Dormition or Assumption of Mary, the feast of assumption is celebrated among some denominations and not others.[30][319] While the Roman Catholic Church celebrates the Feast of the Assumption on 15 August, some Eastern Catholics celebrate it as Dormition of the Theotokos, and may do so on 28 August, if they follow the Julian calendar. The Eastern Orthodox also celebrate it as the Dormition of the Theotokos, one of their 12 Great Feasts. Protestants do not celebrate this, or any other Marian feasts.[30]

Relics[edit | edit source]

The veneration of Marian relics used to be common practice before the Reformation. It was later largely surpassed by the veneration of Marian images.

Bodily relics[edit | edit source]

As Mary's body is believed by most Christians to have been taken up into the glory of heaven, her bodily relics have been limited to hair, nails and breast milk.

According to John Calvin's 1543 Treatise on Relics, her hair was exposed for veneration in several churches, including in Rome, Saint-Flour, Cluny and Nevers.[320]

In this book, Calvin criticized the veneration of the Holy Milk due to the lack of biblical references to it and the doubts about the veracity of such relics:

With regard to the milk, there is not perhaps a town, a convent, or nunnery, where it is not shown in large or small quantities. Indeed, had the Virgin been a wet-nurse her whole life, or a dairy, she could not have produced more than is shown as hers in various parts. How they obtained all this milk they do not say, and it is superfluous here to remark that there is no foundation in the Gospels for these foolish and blasphemous extravagances.

Although the veneration of Marian bodily relics is no longer a common practice today, there are some remaining traces of it, such as the Chapel of the Milk Grotto in Bethlehem, named after Mary's milk.

Clothes[edit | edit source]

Late His Eminence Meletios Barnabas, Former Syriac Orthodox Arch Bishop of Homs, with the Holy Girdle of the Virgin Mary

Clothes which are believed to have belonged to Mary include the Cincture of the Theotokos kept in the Vatopedi monastery and her Holy Girdle kept in Holy Belt Church, Homs.

Other relics are said to have been collected during later Marian apparitions, such as her robe, veil, and part of her belt which were kept in Blachernae church in Constantinople after she appeared there during the 10th century. These relics, now lost, are celebrated by the Eastern Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic Churches as the Intercession of the Theotokos.

Few other objects are said to have been touched or given by Mary during apparitions, notably a 1531 image printed on a tilma, known as Our Lady of Guadalupe, belonging to Juan Diego.

Places[edit | edit source]

The chapel based on the claimed House of Mary in Ephesus

Places where Mary is believed to have lived include the Basilica della Santa Casa in Loreto, Marche, and the House of the Virgin Mary in Ephesus.

Eastern Christians believe that she died and was put in the Tomb of the Virgin Mary near Jerusalem before the Assumption.

The belief that Mary's house was in Ephesus is recent, as it was claimed in the 19th century based on the visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich, an Augustinian nun in Germany.[321][322] It has since been named as the House of the Virgin Mary by Roman Catholic pilgrims who consider it the place where Mary lived until her assumption.[323][324][325][326] The Gospel of John states that Mary went to live with the Disciple whom Jesus loved,[327] traditionally identified as John the Evangelist[328] and John the Apostle. Irenaeus and Eusebius of Caesarea wrote in their histories that John later went to Ephesus, which may provide the basis for the early belief that Mary also lived in Ephesus with John.[329][330]

The apparition of Our Lady of the Pillar in the first century was believed to be a bilocation, as it occurred in Spain while Mary was living in Ephesus or Jerusalem. The pillar on which she was standing during the apparition is believed to be kept in the Cathedral-Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar in Zaragoza and is therefore venerated as a relics, as it was in physical contact with Mary.

In arts[edit | edit source]

Iconography[edit | edit source]

In paintings, Mary is traditionally portrayed in blue. This tradition can trace its origin to the Byzantine Empire, from c. 500 AD, where blue was "the colour of an empress". A more practical explanation for the use of this colour is that in Medieval and Renaissance Europe, the blue pigment was derived from the rock lapis lazuli, a stone of greater value than gold, which was imported from Afghanistan. Beyond a painter's retainer, patrons were expected to purchase any gold or lapis lazuli to be used in the painting. Hence, it was an expression of devotion and glorification to swathe the Virgin in gowns of blue. Transformations in visual depictions of Mary from the 13th to 15th centuries mirror her "social" standing within the Church and in society.[331]

Traditional representations of Mary include the crucifixion scene, called Stabat Mater.[332][333] While not recorded in the Gospel accounts, Mary cradling the dead body of her son is a common motif in art, called a "pietà" or "pity".

In the Egyptian, Eritrean, and Ethiopian tradition, Mary has been portrayed in story and paint for centuries.[334] Beginning in the 1600s, however, highland Ethiopians began portraying Mary performing a variety of miracles for the faithful, including paintings of her giving water to a thirsty dog, healing monks with her breast milk, and saving a man eaten by a crocodile.[335] Over 1,000 such stories about her exist in this tradition, and about one hundred of those have hundreds of paintings each, in various manuscripts, adding up to thousands of paintings.[336]

Cinematic portrayals[edit | edit source]

Mary has been portrayed in various films and on television, including:

Music[edit | edit source]

See also[edit | edit source]

Notes[edit | edit source]

  1. Per the Jewish customs surrounding marriage at the time, and the apocryphal Gospel of James, Mary, at the time of her betrothal to Joseph, was 12–14 years old.[1][2][3][4] Her year of birth is therefore contingent on that of Jesus, and though some posit slightly different dates (such as Meier's dating of c. 7 or 6 BC)[5] general consensus places Jesus' birth in c. 4 BC,[6] thus placing Mary's birth in c. 18 BC.
  2. Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.; Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.; Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.; Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.; Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.; Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.
  3. Script error: The function "langx" does not exist.; Matthew 1:23[15] uses the Greek parthénos, "virgin", whereas only the Hebrew of Isaiah 7:14,[16] from which the New Testament ostensibly quotes, as Almah – "young maiden". See article on parthénos in Bauercc/(Arndt)/Gingrich/Danker, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature.[17]
  4. See Sabine R. Huebner's succinct analysis of the issue: "Jesus is described as the 'first-born son' of Mary in Mt 1:25 and Lk 2:7. From this wording alone we can conclude that there were later-born sons ... The family ... had at least five sons and an unknown number of daughters."[27]
  5. To give a few examples, Our Lady of Good Counsel, Our Lady of Navigators, and Our Lady Undoer of Knots fit this description.[44][45][46][47]
  6. This event is described by some Christians as the Annunciation.
  7. The historicity of this census' relationship to the birth of Jesus continues to be one of scholarly disagreement; see, for example, p. 71 in Edwards, James R. (2015).[83]
  8. Alternately: "It cannot even be denied that God conferred the highest honour on Mary, by choosing and appointing her to be the mother of his Son."[187][188]
  9. See the following verses: Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref, Template:Qref.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 "Catholic Encyclopedia: St. Joseph". Newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 27 June 2017. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  2. Meier, John P. (1991). A Marginal Jew: The Roots of the Problem and the Person. Yale University Press. pp. 235, 318. ISBN 978-0-300-14018-7.
  3. Thompson, A. Keith (2020). "The Character and Knowledge of Mary, the Mother of Christ". Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship. 36: 110. ISSN 2372-126X.
  4. Richard, France (2011). "The Birth of Jesus". In Holmen, Tom; Porter, Stanley E. (eds.). Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. Brill. p. 2376. ISBN 978-90-04-16372-0. Archived from the original on 18 December 2025. Retrieved 21 February 2025.
  5. Meier, John P. (1991). A Marginal Jew: The Roots of the Problem and the Person. Yale University Press. p. 407. ISBN 978-0-300-14018-7.
  6. Sanders, E. P. (1993). The Historical Figure of Jesus. Allen Lane Penguin Press. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-0-14-192822-7. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  7. "Catholic Enncyclopedia: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary". New Advent. Archived from the original on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 2 January 2023.
  8. "Tomb of Mary: Location and Significance: University of Dayton, Ohio". udayton.edu. Archived from the original on 8 June 2023. Retrieved 2 January 2023.
  9. Brown, Raymond Edward; Fitzmyer, Joseph A.; Donfried, Karl Paul (1978). Mary in the New Testament. NJ: Paulist Press. p. 140. ISBN 978-0809121687. Archived from the original on 17 August 2021. Retrieved 23 February 2021. ...consonant with Mary's Jewish background
  10. "Liturgy of the Assyrian Church of the East". Archived from the original on 14 March 2007. Retrieved 3 August 2024.
  11. Quran 3:42; cited in Stowasser, Barbara Freyer, "Mary", in: Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, General Editor: Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Georgetown University, Washington DC.
  12. J. D. McAuliffe, Chosen of all women.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Jestice, Phyllis G. Holy people of the world: a cross-cultural encyclopedia, Volume 3. 2004, ISBN 1-57607-355-6, p. 558 Sayyidana Maryam. Archived 27 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 Bowman, Glenn (2012). Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations Around Holy Places. Berghahn Books. p. 17. ISBN 9780857454867.
  15. Matthew 1:23
  16. Isaiah 7:14
  17. Bauercc/(Arndt)/Gingrich/Danker, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, 1979, p. 627.
  18. Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; (2008). Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, ISBN 978-1-57918-355-4, p. 178.
  19. Mary for evangelicals by Tim S. Perry, William J. Abraham 2006 ISBN 0-8308-2569-X p. 142
  20. "Mary, the mother of Jesus" The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Houghton Mifflin. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002. Credo Reference. Web. 28 September 2010.
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 Hillerbrand, Hans J. (15 January 2004). The Encyclopedia of Protestantism. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-48431-9.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Wengert, Timothy J.; Granquist, Mark A.; Haemig, Mary; Kolb, Robert; Mattes, Mark; Strom, Jonathan (22 August 2017). Dictionary of Luther and the Lutheran Traditions. Baker Academic. ISBN 978-1-4934-1023-1. The Lutheran confessions maintain the traditional christological titles for Mary (e.g., Theotokos) and no not dispute the question of her perpetual virginity. Likewise, Lutherans retaind the (biblical) Marian feast days of the Annunciation, the Purification of Mary, and the Visitation.
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 Smith, Gordon T. (4 February 2010). The Lord's Supper: Five Views. InterVarsity Press. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-8308-7868-0. Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, art. 8.15ff. (Tappert, pp. 594ff.) Notice well the strong avowal of Mary's Mother-of-God title (and of her perpetual virginity) in Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, art. 8.24.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 Anderson, Hugh George; Stafford, J. Francis; Burgess, Joseph A. (1992). The One Mediator, the Saints, and Mary. Alban Books. p. 241. ISBN 978-0-8066-2579-9. In the Smalcald Articles of 1537 Luther reaffirmed Mary's perpetual virginity, calling her "ever virgin" (semper virgo). The Formula of Concord of 1577 repeated Mary's ancient ecumenical title "God-bearer" (Theotokos) and praised her as "the most blessed virgin" (laudtissima virgo).
  25. "Mary", A Dictionary of First Names by Patrick Hanks, Kate Hardcastle and Flavia Hodges (2006). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198610602.
  26. Matthew 1:25
  27. Sabine R. Huebner, Papyri and the Social World of the New Testament (Cambridge University Press, 2019), p. 73. ISBN 1108470254
  28. Fulbert of Chatres, O Beata Virgo Maria, archived from the original on 4 March 2021, retrieved 27 March 2020
  29. Encyclopedia of Catholicism by Frank K. Flinn, J. Gordon Melton, 2007, ISBN 0-8160-5455-X, pp. 443–444
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 Hillerbrand, Hans Joachim. Encyclopedia of Protestantism, Volume 3, 2003. ISBN 0-415-92472-3, p. 1174
  31. 31.0 31.1 31.2 31.3 31.4 31.5 Eastern Orthodoxy through Western eyes by Donald Fairbairn 2002 ISBN 0-664-22497-0 pp. 99–101
  32. Longenecker, Father Dwight. "God-bearer". Catholic Answers. Archived from the original on 30 July 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
  33. "Council of Ephesus". New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 18 July 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
  34. 34.0 34.1 "The Canons of the Two Hundred Holy and Blessed Fathers Who Met at Ephesus". Ccel.org. 1 June 2005. Archived from the original on 17 June 2010. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  35. M'Corry, John StewartTheotokos: Or, the Divine Maternity. 2009 ISBN 1-113-18361-6 p. 10
  36. The Christian theology reader by Alister E. McGrath 2006 ISBN 1-4051-5358-X p. 273
  37. Luke 1:32
  38. Isaiah 9:6
  39. 1 Kings 2:19–20
  40. Jeremiah 13:18–19
  41. What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary by Terrence J. McNally ISBN 1-4415-1051-6 p. 128
  42. Hahn, Scott (2006). Hail, Holy Queen: The Mother of God in the Word of God. Image. p. 78. ISBN 978-0385501699.
  43. Smith, Scott (2018). What You Need to Know About Mary: But Were Never Taught. Holy Water Books. p. 87. ISBN 978-0998360324.
  44. Legends of the Madonna by Anna Jameson 2009 ISBN 1406853380 p. 50
  45. Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X p. 515
  46. Candice Lee Goucher, 2007 World history: journeys from past to present ISBN 0-415-77137-4 p. 102
  47. Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X p. 525
  48. Glassé, Cyril (2008). "Mary". The New Encyclopedia of Islam (3rd ed.). Plymouth, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. pp. 340–341. ISBN 978-0742562967. Archived from the original on 17 November 2019. Retrieved 2 June 2016.
  49. Template:Qref
  50. 50.0 50.1 50.2 Template:Qref
  51. 51.0 51.1 Template:Qref
  52. Template:Qref
  53. Elias, Abu Amina (6 October 2012). "Hadith on Maryam: Why Mary is called sister of Aaron". www.abuaminaelias.com. Retrieved 18 November 2024.
  54. 54.0 54.1 54.2 Hesemann, Michael (2016). Mary of Nazareth: History, Archaeology, Legends. Ignatius. p. 4. ISBN 978-1621640905.
  55. 55.0 55.1 Canales, Arthur David (2010). "Mary of Nazareth" (PDF). Saint Mary's Press. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 October 2022. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
  56. Luke 1:27–2:34
  57. Matthew 1:16–2:11
  58. Matthew 13:55
  59. Mark 6:3
  60. Mark 3:31–32
  61. 61.0 61.1 John 2:1–12
  62. 62.0 62.1 John 19:25–26
  63. William Temple, Readings in St John's Gospel. London, England: MacMillan, 1961. pp. 35, 36.
  64. John 2:4
  65. Acts 1:14
  66. Revelation 12:1, 5–6
  67. John 19:25
  68. "Church Fathers: The Perpetual Virginity of Mary (Jerome)". New Advent. Archived from the original on 5 August 2018. Retrieved 9 December 2016.
  69. "The Blessed Virgin Mary – Encyclopedia Volume – Catholic Encyclopedia". Catholic Online. Archived from the original on 20 May 2021. Retrieved 7 April 2014.
  70. Luke 1:5,Luke 1:36
  71. Douglas; Hillyer; Bruce (1990). New Bible Dictionary. Inter-varsity Press. p. 746. ISBN 978-0-85110-630-4.
  72. "New Advent Genealogy of Christ". Newadvent.org. 1 September 1909. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  73. Henry, Matthew (1706). Luke in Matthew Henry commentary on the whole Bible (complete). Archived from the original on 18 July 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2016.
  74. Numbers 1:7; Exodus 6:23
  75. Luke 1:56
  76. "Catholic Encyclopedia: The Blessed Virgin Mary". Newadvent.org. 1 October 1912. Archived from the original on 10 October 2018. Retrieved 22 June 2022.
  77. Luke 1:35
  78. Mills, Watson E., Roger Aubrey Bullard. Mercer dictionary of the Bible. 1998 ISBN 0-86554-373-9 p. 429
  79. Matthew 1:18–25
  80. Luke 1:36
  81. kjv Luke 1:46–55
  82. Luke 1:56–57
  83. The Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0802837356.
  84. Brown, Raymond Edward. Mary in the New Testament. 1978 ISBN 978-0-8091-2168-7
  85. Luke 2
  86. 86.0 86.1 86.2 Levine, Amy-Jill & Witherington III, Ben: The Gospel of Luke, p. 34. Cambridge University Press, 2018. ISBN 9780521859509.
  87. Leith, Mary Joan Winn: Mary, Mother of Jesus. In Coogan, Michael (ed.): Oxford Encyclopedias of the Bible: Digital Collection. Oxford University Press, 2022. ISBN 9780197669402.
  88. 88.0 88.1 Tropper, A: Children and Childhood in Light of the Demographics of the Jewish Family in Late Antiquity. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period, Vol. 37, 2006, 3, pp. 299–343.
  89. Keener, Craig S.; Walton, John H. (2019). NRSV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible: Bringing to Life the Ancient World of Scripture. Zondervan. p. 2147. ISBN 978-0-310-45272-0. Retrieved 21 January 2023.
  90. The Gospel of Matthew by R. T. France 2007 ISBN 0-8028-2501-X p. 53
  91. Luke 2:22
  92. Leviticus 12:1–8
  93. Luke 2:23; Exodus 13:2; 13:12–15; 22:29; 34:19–20; Numbers 3:13; 18:15
  94. Luke 2:25–38
  95. Luke 2:39
  96. Matthew 2
  97. Walvoord, John F.; Roy B. Zuck. The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament edition. 1983. ISBN 0-88207-812-7.
  98. Luke 2:41–52
  99. John 2:1–11
  100. Mt 1:24–25, 12:46, 13:54–56, 27:56, Mk 3:31, 6:3, 15:40, 16:1, Jn 2:12, 7:3–5, Gal 1:19, Acts 1:14
  101. Butz, Jeffrey J. (2005). The Brother of Jesus and the Lost Teachings of Christianity. Simon and Schuster. p. 27. ISBN 9781594778797.
  102. Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible by D. N. Freedman, David Noel, Allen Myers and Astrid B. Beck (2000) ISBN 9053565035 p. 202
  103. The Bible: The Basics by John Barton (2010) Routledge ISBN 0415411351 p. 7
  104. Gaventa, Beverly Roberts. Mary: glimpses of the mother of Jesus. 1995 ISBN 1-57003-072-3, p. 70
  105. Mark 3:31–35
  106. Matthew 27:56
  107. Mark 15:40
  108. Acts 1:12–26
  109. "Pentecost and the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church". NCR. 23 May 2021. Archived from the original on 30 October 2025. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
  110. kjv Revelation 12:1
  111. Maas, Anthony. "The Blessed Virgin Mary". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Robert Appleton Company. Archived from the original on 10 October 2018. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
  112. Stephen J. Shoemaker, Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption. Archived 11 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine. (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002, 2006); De Obitu S. Dominae as noted in; Holweck, F. (1907). The Feast of the Assumption. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  113. "Munificentissimus Deus on the Assumption". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 4 September 2013. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  114. Coptic Church website Archived 13 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Accessed 2010/10/6.
  115. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, pp. 21–22, 52–53. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. ISBN 978-952-5652-87-1
  116. Ronald Brownrigg, Canon Brownrigg. Who's Who in the New Testament, 2001. ISBN 0-415-26036-1, p. T-62.
  117. Roy, Christian (2005). Traditional Festivals: A Multicultural Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 373. ISBN 978-1-57607-089-5. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  118. Gospel of James 8:2
  119. Gospel of James 12:3
  120. Vuong, Lily C.: Gender and Purity in the Protevangelium of James, p. 171. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.
  121. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, pp. 40–41. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. ISBN 978-9525652871.
  122. Allison, Dale C., Matthew: A Shorter Commentary, p. 12 Archived 5 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004 ISBN 0-567-08249-0
  123. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, pp. 36–42. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. ISBN 978-952-5652-87-1
  124. The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies by Susan Ashbrook Harvey, David G. Hunter 2008 ISBN 978-0199271566 p. 527
  125. The reception and interpretation of the Bible in late antiquity by Lorenzo DiTommaso, Lucian Turcescu 2008 ISBN 9004167153 p. 507
  126. Maximus's Mary Archived 30 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine, by Sally Cuneen, Commonweal Magazine, 4 December 2009
  127. Rainer Riesner (1998). Paul's early period: chronology, mission strategy, theology. Wm. B. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0802841667. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 20 August 2011.
  128. 128.0 128.1 128.2 128.3 128.4 Makdisi, Ussama (2000). The Culture of Sectarianism: Community, History, and Violence in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Lebanon. University of California Press. p. 35. ISBN 978-0520218468.
  129. 129.0 129.1 129.2 Flinn, Frank K., J. Gordon MeltonEncyclopedia of Catholicism. 2007 ISBN 0-8160-5455-X pp. 443–444
  130. 130.0 130.1 130.2 130.3 130.4 130.5 130.6 Schroedel, Jenny The Everything Mary Book, 2006 ISBN 1-59337-713-4 pp. 81–85
  131. Miegge, Giovanni, The Virgin Mary: Roman Catholic Marian Doctrine, pp. 15–22, Westminster Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1963.
  132. 132.0 132.1 Fahlbusch, Erwin, et al. The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3 2003, ISBN 90-04-12654-6, pp. 403–409.
  133. Merriam-Webster's encyclopedia of world religions by Wendy Doniger, 1999 ISBN 0-87779-044-2 p. 696
  134. "Encyclical Ad Caeli Reginam". Vatican. Archived from the original on 7 October 2010. Retrieved 15 March 2020.
  135. 135.0 135.1 Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Template:Cite CCC/URL lookup.HTM#:~:text=971%20 Paragraphs 971.
  136. The Catholicism Answer Book by John Trigilio, Kenneth Brighenti 2007 ISBN 1-4022-0806-5 p. 325
  137. "Vatican website: Marian consecration and entrustment, item 204". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 23 June 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  138. Schroede, Jenny, The Everything Mary Book 2006 ISBN 1-59337-713-4 p. 219
  139. O'Carroll, Michael, The Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary 2007, ISBN 1-882972-98-8 pp. 10–15
  140. "Catholic Encyclopedia: Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary". NewAdvent.org. 1 October 1912. Archived from the original on 19 April 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  141. "Cardinal Urges Devotion to Rosary and Scapular". Zenit.org. 17 July 2008. Archived from the original on 14 November 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  142. Handbook of Prayers by James Socías 2006 ISBN 0-87973-579-1 p. 483
  143. The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 4 by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2005 ISBN 0-8028-2416-1 p. 575
  144. Pope Leo XIII. "Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII on the Rosary". Octobri Mense. Vatican. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 4 October 2010.
  145. A Beginner's Book of Prayer: An Introduction to Traditional Catholic Prayers by William G. Storey 2009 ISBN 0-8294-2792-9 p. 99
  146. Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X p. 365
  147. Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Almanac by Matthew Bunson 2009 ISBN 1-59276-441-X p. 122
  148. The Catholic Handbook for Visiting the Sick and Homebound by Corinna Laughlin, Sara McGinnis Lee 2010 ISBN 978-1-56854-886-9 p. 4
  149. Geoghegan. G.P. A Collection of My Favorite Prayers, 2006 ISBN 1-4116-9457-0 pp. 31, 45, 70, 86, 127
  150. Mary, mother of the redemption by Edward Schillebeeckx 1964 ASIN B003KW30VG pp. 82–84
  151. Mary in the Redemption by Adrienne von Speyr 2003 ISBN 0-89870-955-5 pp. 2–7
  152. Salvation Through Mary by Henry Aloysius Barry 2008 ISBN 1-4097-3172-3 pp. 13–15
  153. The mystery of Mary by Paul Haffner 2004 ISBN 0-85244-650-0 p. 198
  154. "Redemptoris Mater at the Vatican website". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 1 January 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  155. 155.0 155.1 Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; (2008). Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 978-1-57918-355-4 p. xxi
  156. "The Assumption Presumption and the Dormition Tradition". National Catholic Register. 15 August 2019. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
  157. Jackson, Gregory Lee.Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison. 1993 ISBN 978-0-615-16635-3 p. 254
  158. Miravalle, Mark. Introduction to Mary. 1993 Queenship Publishing ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 p. 51
  159. Gatewood, Timothy (8 November 2023). "Should Evangelicals Call Mary the "Mother of God"?". credomag.com. Archived from the original on 29 June 2024. Retrieved 29 June 2024.
  160. The American Lutheran, Volume 49. American Lutheran Publicity Bureau. 1966. p. 16. While the perpetual virginity of Mary is held as a pious opinion by many Lutheran confessors, it is not regarded as binding teaching of the Scriptures.
  161. "What is our position on St. Mary and Immaculate Conception and what is it?". Diocese of U.S.A. and Canada, Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church. 19 January 2016. Archived from the original on 5 November 2023. Retrieved 6 January 2025.
  162. "THE BIRTH OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY – Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Sunday School Department – Mahibere Kidusan".
  163. Miravalle, Mark Introduction to Mary, 1993, ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7, pp. 44–46
  164. "Virgin Birth Archived 3 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine" britannica.com. Retrieved 22 October 2007.
  165. Translation by the ecumenical English Language Liturgical Consultation, given on p. 17 of Praying Together, a literal translation of the original Archived 1 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine, "σαρκωθέντα ἐκ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου καὶ Μαρίας τῆς Παρθένου", accessed 11 September 2014
  166. Isaiah 7:14
  167. Matthew 1:18; Matthew 1:25; Luke 1:34
  168. 168.0 168.1 Miravalle, Mark Introduction to Mary, 1993, ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7, pp. 56–64
  169. "Catholic Encyclopedia: Immaculate Conception". Newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 5 December 2021. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
  170. Ware, Timothy. The Orthodox Church (Penguin Books, 1963, ISBN 0-14-020592-6), pp. 263–264.
  171. Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Template:Cite CCC/URL lookup.HTM#:~:text=499%20 Paragraphs 499..
  172. McNally, Terrence, What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary ISBN 1-4415-1051-6 pp. 168–169
  173. 173.0 173.1 173.2 Ecclesiasticus II: Orthodox Icons, Saints, Feasts and Prayer by George Dion Dragas 2005 ISBN 0-9745618-0-0 pp. 81–83
  174. The Everything Mary Book by Jenny Schroedel 2006 ISBN 1-59337-713-4 p. 90
  175. Vasilaka, Maria Images of the Mother of God: perceptions of the Theotokos in Byzantium 2005 ISBN 0-7546-3603-8 p. 97
  176. 176.0 176.1 176.2 176.3 The Orthodox Church by Serge? Nikolaevich Bulgakov 1997 ISBN 0-88141-051-9 p. 116
  177. "Orthodox Holiness: The Titles Of The Saints". www.orthodoxengland.org.uk. Archived from the original on 14 November 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  178. Nazianzenus, Gregorius. "In theophania". Documenta Catholica Omnia. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
  179. Wybrew, Hugh Orthodox feasts of Jesus Christ & the Virgin Mary: liturgical texts 2000 ISBN 0-88141-203-1 pp. 37–46
  180. Damascene, John. Homily 2 on the Dormition 14; p. 96, 741 B
  181. Damascene, John. Homily 2 on the Dormition 16; p. 96, 744 D
  182. Luke 1:42
  183. Geisler, Norman L.; MacKenzie, Ralph E. (1995), Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: agreements and differences, Baker Publishing, p. 143, ISBN 978-0-8010-3875-4
  184. White, James (1998). Mary – Another Redeemer?. Bethany House Publishers.
  185. Barth, Karl (2004), Church dogmatics, vol. 1, A&C Black, pp. 143–144, ISBN 978-0-567-05069-4
  186. Lehmann, H., ed. Luther's Works, American edition, vol. 43, p. 40, Fortress, 1968.
  187. Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, 1845, Jean Calvin, Rev. William Pringle, Edinburgh, Volume 2, p. 87 quote Archived 8 December 2021 at the Wayback Machine
  188. "Neque etiam negari potest, quin Deus Mariam Filio suo matrem eligens ac destinans summo eam honore dignatus sit." Calvin's Opera, vol. 45 (Corpus Reformatorum, vol. 73), p. 348. no preview
  189. McKim, Donald K. (2004), The Cambridge companion to John Calvin, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-01672-8.
  190. Haffner, Paul (2004), The mystery of Mary, Gracewing, p. 11, ISBN 978-0-85244-650-8
  191. Williams, Paul (2007). pp. 238, 251, quote: "Where Anglican writers discuss the doctrine of the Assumption, it is either rejected or held to be of the adiaphora."
  192. Carlson, Kristofer (5 July 2013). "The Book of Concord on Mariology". Dormition Press. Archived from the original on 16 October 2025. Retrieved 30 July 2025. The descriptive title of "most blessed Virgin Mary" is, of course, a reference to the Annunciation, where the angel Gabriel said "blessed art thou among women" (Luke 1:28). It is also a reference to the Visitation, where Elizabeth shouted in the Spirit: "Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. …And blessed is she that believed" (Luke 1:42, 45). And finally, it is a reference to the Magnificat, where Mary says: "From henceforth all generations shall call me blessed" (Luke 1:48).
  193. McDonnell, Kilian (1960). Mary and the Protestants. College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University. p. 35.
  194. Bäumer, Remigius. Marienlexikon Gesamtausgabe, Leo Scheffczyk, ed., (Regensburg: Institutum Marianum, 1994), 190.
  195. Schroedel, Jenny (2006), The Everything Mary Book, Adams Media, pp. 125–126, ISBN 978-1-59337-713-7
  196. Jackson, Gregory Lee (1993), Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison, Lulu.com, p. 249, ISBN 978-0-615-16635-3
  197. Bäumer, 191
  198. Haffner, Paul (2004), The mystery of Mary, Gracewing, p. 223, ISBN 978-0-85244-650-8
  199. Bäumer, 190.
  200. Colonna, Vittoria; Matraini, Chiara; Marinella, Lucrezia (2009). Who Is Mary?. University of Chicago Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-226-11400-2.
  201. Eric W. Gritsch (1992). H. George Anderson; J. Francis Stafford; Joseph A. Burgess (eds.). The One Mediator, The Saints and Mary, Lutherans and Roman Catholic in Dialogue. Vol. VII. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress. p. 235.
  202. Luther's Works, 47, pp. 45f.
  203. Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue VIII, p. 29.
  204. Clairvaux, Saint Bernard de (1476). Homiliae S. Bernardi super evangelio: "Missus est angelus Gabriel" – saint Bernard de Clairvaux – Google Boeken. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  205. Doberstein, John W.; Lehmann, Helmut T., eds. (1959) [1546], "Sermon on the Second Sunday after Epiphany", Sermons I, Luther's Works, vol. 51, Fortress Press, p. 375, ISBN 978-0-8006-0351-9
  206. Dr. Martin Luthers Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol. 51, Weimar, 1883, p. 128{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  207. "More FAQ". The Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church. Archived from the original on 23 May 2010. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  208. Milton, Anthony Catholic and Reformed 2002 ISBN 0-521-89329-1 p. 5
  209. 209.0 209.1 Braaten, Carl, et al. Mary, Mother of God 2004 ISBN 0-8028-2266-5 p. 13
  210. Burnham, Andrew A Pocket Manual of Anglo-Catholic Devotion 2004 ISBN 1-85311-530-4 pp. 1, 266, 310, 330
  211. Duckworth, Penelope, Mary: The Imagination of Her Heart 2004 ISBN 1-56101-260-2 pp. 3–5
  212. Church of England yearbook: Volume 123 2006 ISBN 0-7151-1020-9 p. 315
  213. Perrier, Jacques, Lourdes Today and Tomorrow 2008 ISBN 1565483057 p. 56
  214. Mary: grace and hope in Christ: the Seattle statement of the Anglican-Roman Catholics by the Anglican/Roman Catholic International Group 2006 ISBN 0-8264-8155-8 pp. 7–10
  215. "What does The United Methodist Church teach about the Immaculate Conception and the Virgin Birth?". Archives.umc.org. 6 November 2006. Archived from the original on 29 July 2013. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  216. Wesley's Letters, The Wesley Center Online, 1749, archived from the original on 5 November 2011
  217. "Mary's Perpetual Virginity". Davidmacd.com. Archived from the original on 25 August 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  218. "What does The United Methodist Church teach about the Virgin Mary?". Archives.umc.org. 6 November 2006. Retrieved 30 September 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  219. "Comparing Christian Denominations – Beliefs: Nature of Mary". Christianity.about.com. 30 July 2013. Archived from the original on 4 April 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  220. Stepp, Todd (23 December 2009). "Theotokos; Mary, Mother of God". Wesleyan/Anglican Society. We Protestants (for the most part) tend to say something to the affect [sic] that, if it is not found in Scripture it is not held to be required as an article of faith. Thus, the assumption of Mary would not be held as an article of faith (i.e., as a required doctrine). However, in as much as the Scripture does not say that Mary was not assumed into heaven, and, in as much as we do have other instances of some sort of "assumption" in Scripture (e.g., Elijah, as mentioned, before), there seems to be nothing that would require that a Protestant Christian could not have a private "opinion" (in the Wesleyan sense of the term) that agrees with Rome or Constantinople (at least regarding Mary's assumption).
  221. Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America 2006 p. 73 Eugene V. Gallagher, W. Michael Ashcraft: "Jehovah's Witnesses pray to God in the name of Jesus, but insist that the Bible never identifies Christ as an eternal ... Jehovah God caused an ovum, or egg cell, in Mary's womb to become fertile, accomplishing this by the transferral of."
  222. Colton, Eleanor (1992), "Virgin Birth", Encyclopedia of Mormonism, vol. 4, New York1: Macmillan Publishing Co., p. 1510, archived from the original on 2 July 2017, retrieved 14 September 2015{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  223. Template:Lds
  224. Template:Lds
  225. Fronk, Camille (1992), "Mary, Mother of Jesus", Encyclopedia of Mormonism, vol. 2, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., pp. 863–864, archived from the original on 2 July 2017, retrieved 10 June 2013
  226. Christian mortalism from Tyndale to Milton Norman T. Burns – 1972
  227. The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman culture: Volume 3 – p. 369 Peter Schäfer, Catherine Hezser – 2002 The Mother of the Messiah in the Talmud Yerushalmi and Sefer Zerubbabel by Martha Himmelfarb "Through the centuries the Virgin Mary has played a central role in Christian piety. Unlike so many aspects of Christianity, veneration of the…"
  228. Peter Schäfer, Mirror of His beauty: feminine images of God from the Bible to the early Kabbalah. 2002, p. 233: "On the one hand, it mockingly disapproves of the idea of the mother of God; on the other hand, it treats Mary considerately and by no means only polemically. The talmudic and post-talmudic discussions about the Virgin Mary are classic…"
  229. Van Voorst, Robert E (2000). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence WmB Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 0-8028-4368-9 pp. 122, 127
  230. Michael J. Cook Jewish Perspectives on Jesus Chapter 14 in "The Blackwell Companion to Jesus" edited by Delbert Burkett 2011 ISBN 978-1-4443-2794-6
  231. 231.0 231.1 Amy G. Remensnyder (2014). La Conquistadora: The Virgin Mary at War and Peace in the Old and New Worlds. OUP US. pp. 138–. ISBN 978-0-19-989300-3. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2018.
  232. Robert Van Voorst (2000). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 122–. ISBN 978-0-8028-4368-5. Archived from the original on 18 August 2021. Retrieved 24 February 2018.
  233. Mary in the New Testament by Raymond Edward Brown, et al. 1978 ISBN 0-8091-2168-9 p. 262
  234. Van Voorst, Robert E. (2000). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence, WmB Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 0-8028-4368-9, p. 128.
  235. 235.0 235.1 The new encyclopedia of Islam by Cyril Glassé, Huston Smith 2003 ISBN 0-7591-0190-6 p. 296 sayyidatuna Archived 5 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine
  236. Qa'im, Mahdi Muntazir (2007). Jesus Through the Qur'an and Shi'ite Narrations (bilingual ed.). Queens, New York: Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an. p. 16. ISBN 978-1879402140.
  237. Template:Qref
  238. 238.0 238.1 238.2 Template:Qref
  239. 239.0 239.1 239.2 Template:Qref
  240. Template:Qref
  241. Template:Qref
  242. Jomier, Jacques. The Bible and the Qur'an. 2002 ISBN 0-89870-928-8 p. 133
  243. Nazir-Ali, Michael. Islam, a Christian perspective. 1984 ISBN 0-664-24527-7 p. 110
  244. "The Virgin Mary In The Koran". EWTN.com. 13 April 1978. Archived from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  245. Jackson, Montell. Islam Revealed. 2003 ISBN 1-59160-869-4 p. 73
  246. Template:Qref
  247. Rodwell, J. M. The Koran. 2009, ISBN 0-559-13127-5, p. 505.
  248. Akhtar, Shabbir.The Quran and the secular mind: a philosophy of Islam. 2007 p. 352
  249. Glassé, Cyril, Huston Smith. The new encyclopedia of Islam. 2003 ISBN 0-7591-0190-6 p. 240
  250. Sarker, Abraham.Understand My Muslim People. 2004 ISBN 1-59498-002-0 p. 260 no preview Archived 17 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine
  251. 251.0 251.1 Dana, Nissim (2008). The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status. Michigan University press. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-903900-36-9.
  252. 252.0 252.1 Munro, Dane; Haddad, Nour Fara (2019). Peace Journeys: A New Direction in Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Research. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 7. ISBN 9781527543133.
  253. Grehan, James (2016). Twilight of the Saints: Everyday Religion in Ottoman Syria and Palestine. Oxford University Press. p. 178. ISBN 9780190619145. On Mt. Lebanon, so many Druze flocked to the shrine of the Virgin of the Mountain, located in the Shihabi administrative seat of Dayr al-Qamr, that it became known as the "Virgin of the Druze".
  254. The Kitáb-i-Íqán Part One Archived 8 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Bahá'í Reference Library. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
  255. "The Promised Day Is Come | Bahá'í Reference Library". www.bahai.org. Archived from the original on 7 August 2021. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
  256. Coogan, Michael (October 2010). God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says (1st ed.). New York, Boston: Twelve. Hachette Book Group. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-446-54525-9. Retrieved 5 May 2011. god and sex.
  257. McNally, Terrence, What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary ISBN 1-4415-1051-6 p. 95
  258. Cradle of redeeming love by John Saward 2002 Ignatius Press ISBN 0-89870-886-9 p. 17
  259. Mary in the New Testament by Raymond Edward Brown 1978 ISBN 0-8091-2168-9 p. 86
  260. Ehrman, Bart Did Jesus Exist p. 294
  261. John 1:45
  262. John 6:42
  263. Ehrman, Bart D. (2008). Whose Word is It?: The Story Behind who Changed the New Testament and why. A&C Black. pp. 158–. ISBN 978-1-84706-314-4. Archived from the original on 17 August 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
  264. Ehrman, Bart D. (1999). Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford University Press. pp. 96–. ISBN 978-0-19-983943-8.
  265. Romans 1:3
  266. Coogan, Michael (2010). God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says. New York, Boston: Twelve. Hachette Book Group. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-446-54525-9. Retrieved 5 May 2011.
  267. Bennett, Clinton, In search of Jesus 2001 ISBN 0-8264-4916-6 pp. 165–170
  268. Also see: Schaberg, Jane. Illegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives (Biblical Seminar Series, No 28), ISBN 1-85075-533-7.
  269. Contra Celsum by Origen, Henry Chadwick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953) reprint 1980 ISBN 0-521-29576-9 p. 32
  270. John Patrick The Apology of Origen in Reply to Celsus 1892 reprint 2009 ISBN 1-110-13388-X pp. 22–24
  271. Allert, Craig D. (2002). Revelation, Truth, Canon and Interpretation: Studies in Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho. Brill. p. 34.
  272. Template:Ws
  273. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, p. 60. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. ISBN 978-952-5652-87-1
  274. "Philip Schaff: ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus – Christian Classics Ethereal Library". www.ccel.org. Archived from the original on 27 November 2021.
  275. "Church Fathers: Against Heresies, III.22 (St. Irenaeus)". New Advent. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020.
  276. Shoemaker, Stephen J.: Mary in Early Christian Faith and Devotion, pp. 229–230. Yale University Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0-300-21953-1.
  277. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, p. 368. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010. ISBN 978-952-5652-87-1
  278. Shoemaker, Stephen J.: Mary in Early Christian Faith and Devotion, p. 202, 236. Yale University Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0-300-21953-1.
  279. Mark Miravalle, Raymond L. Burke; Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, 2008, ISBN 978-1-57918-355-4, p. 178.
  280. The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3 by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2003 ISBN 90-04-12654-6 p. 406
  281. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, p. 85. Helsinki: Maahenki, 2010.
  282. "Catholic Encyclopedia: Constantine the Great". Newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 18 January 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  283. Osborne, John L. "Early Medieval Painting in San Clemente, Rome: The Madonna and Child in the Niche" Gesta 20.2 (1981:299–310) and (note 9) referencing T. Klauser, Rom under der Kult des Gottesmutter Maria, Jahrbuch für der Antike und Christentum 15 (1972:120–135).
  284. "The Papal Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 25 November 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  285. "Theotokos". Britannica. Archived from the original on 19 April 2024. Retrieved 29 March 2024.
  286. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, p. 82–83. Maahenki, 2010. ISBN 978-952-5652-87-1
  287. Seppälä, Serafim: Elämän äiti: Neitsyt Maria varhaiskristillisessä teologiassa, p. 114. Maahenki, 2010. ISBN 978-952-5652-87-1
  288. Baldovin, John and Johnson, Maxwell, Between memory and hope: readings on the liturgical year 2001 ISBN 0-8146-6025-8 p. 386
  289. Dalmais, Irénée et al. The Church at Prayer: The liturgy and time 1985 ISBN 0-8146-1366-7 p. 130
  290. McNally, Terrence, What Every Catholic Should Know about Mary ISBN 1-4415-1051-6 p. 186
  291. Stefan Karwiese, The Church of Holy Mary in Ephesos Archived 5 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine, 2008 (phase 3).
  292. Avner, Rina (2016). "The Initial Tradition of the Theotokos at the Kathisma: Earliest Celebrations and the Calendar". In Leslie Brubaker; Mary B. Cunningham (eds.). The Cult of the Mother of God in Byzantium: Texts and Images. Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Studies. Routledge. ISBN 978-1351891974. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 8 January 2019.
  293. Collyridianism – EWTN Archived 24 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 11 September 2014
  294. Cunningham, Mary B. (2021). The Virgin Mary in Byzantium, c. 400–1000: Hymns, Homilies and Hagiography. Cambridge University Press. pp. 211–212. ISBN 978-1-108-84569-4.
  295. Ephesus.us. "Mysterious facts about Ephesus, Ephesus Turkey". www.ephesus.us. Archived from the original on 1 May 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2015.
  296. "Virgin Mary – Justinian – Theotokus – Theodora – Kate Cooper – Divine Women". 18 July 2015. Archived from the original on 21 June 2018. Retrieved 16 September 2015.
  297. Laing, Gordon (1931). "Survivals of Roman Religion". Longmans, Green And Co.
  298. Phipps, William E. (2008). Supernaturalism in Christianity: Its Growth and Cure. Mercer University Press. p. 46. ISBN 978-0881460940. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  299. Toronto Star article – In December 2010, Catherine Lawless of the University of Limerick stated that by analyzing 15th century Florentine manuscripts, she had concluded that 'Ismeria' was the maternal grandmother of Mary. Toronto Star Dec 2010 Archived 14 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine Discovery News Archived 18 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  300. Mâle, Emile (1978). Religious Art in France: The Twelfth Century. Translated by Mathews, Marthiel.
  301. Warner, Marina (1976). Alone of All her Sex: The Myth and the Cult of the Virgin Mary.
  302. Pelikan, Jaroslav (1996). Mary Through the Centuries: Her Place in the History of Culture. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300069518.
  303. Miravalle, Mark. Introduction to Mary. 1993 Queenship Publishing ISBN 978-1-882972-06-7 pp. 92–93
  304. The Orthodox word, Volumes 12–13, 1976 p. 73
  305. Trigilio, John and Brighenti, Kenneth The Catholicism Answer Book 2007 ISBN 1-4022-0806-5 p. 58
  306. The History of the Christian Church by Philip Smith 2009 ISBN 1-150-72245-2 p. 288
  307. The Celebration of Faith: The Virgin Mary by Alexander Schmemann 2001 ISBN 0-88141-141-8 p. 11 Archived 5 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine
  308. De Sherbinin, Julie Chekhov and Russian religious culture: the poetics of the Marian paradigm 1997 ISBN 0-8101-1404-6 p. 15 Archived 5 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine
  309. "Pope John Paul II, General Audience, 1997". Vatican.va. 29 October 1997. Archived from the original on 3 March 2013. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  310. Kilmartin, Edward. The Eucharist in the West 1998. ISBN 0-8146-6204-8, p. 80.
  311. Ciaravino, Helene How to Pray 2001 ISBN 0-7570-0012-6 p. 118
  312. Williams, Rowan Ponder these things: praying with icons of the Virgin 2002 ISBN 1-85311-362-X p. 7
  313. Catholic News Agency website, Marian procession to mark Los Angeles’ 235th birthday, article dated 18 August 2016
  314. Angelus News website, This year’s Grand Marian Procession marks a time of celebration and a call for renewal in the Church, article by Tom Hoffarth dated 31 August 2018
  315. Luke 2:22–40
  316. 316.0 316.1 Clayton, Mary. The Cult of the Virgin Mary in Anglo-Saxon England. 2003 ISBN 0-521-53115-2 pp. 26–37
  317. EWTN on Battle of Lepanto (1571) Our Lady and Islam: Heaven's Peace Plan – EWTN Archived 23 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  318. by Butler, Alban, Peter Doyle. Butler's Lives of the Saints. 1999, ISBN 0-86012-253-0, p. 222.
  319. Jackson, Gregory Lee, Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison. 1993 ISBN 978-0-615-16635-3 p. 254
  320. Calvin, John (1543). A Treatise on Relics (PDF). Project Gutenberg EBook. pp. 184–187.
  321. "Anna Katharina Emmerick (1774–1824), biography". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on 9 September 2004. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  322. Emmerich, Anna Catherine: The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ ISBN 978-0-89555-210-5 p. viii
  323. Frommer's Turkey by Lynn A. Levine 2010 ISBN 0470593660 pp. 254–255
  324. Home of the Assumption: Reconstructing Mary's Life in Ephesus by V. Antony John Alaharasan 2006 ISBN 1929039387 p. 38
  325. Stephen J. Schoemaker, 2006. The Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption, ISBN 0199210748, p. 76.
  326. Mary's House by Donald Carroll (20 April 2000) Veritas, ISBN 0953818802
  327. John 19:27
  328. Based on John 21:20–24
  329. Irenaeus, Adversus haereses III,1,1; Eusebius of Caesarea, Church History, III,1
  330. "Catholic Encyclopedia: Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary". Newadvent.org. 1 July 1912. Archived from the original on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  331. Kugeares, Sophia Manoulian (1991). Images Of The Annunciation Of The Virgin Mary Of The 13th, 14th And 15th Century.
  332. de Bles, Arthur. How to Distinguish the Saints in Art by Their Costumes, Symbols and Attributes, 2004 ISBN 1-4179-0870-X p. 35
  333. Jameson, Anna. Legends of the Madonna: as represented in the fine arts. 2006 ISBN 1-4286-3499-1 p. 37
  334. Chojnacki, Stanisław. 1977. "Note on the Early Imagery of the Virgin Mary in Ethiopia." Ethnologische Zeitschrift 3: 5–41.
  335. Belcher, Wendy (6 October 2023). "The African Library of Paintings of the Virgin Mary". Princeton Ethiopian, Eritrean, and Egyptian Miracles of Mary (PEMM) project. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
  336. Brown, Jeremy, Mehari Worku, Dawit Muluneh, and Evgeniia Lambrinaki. 2023. "The Ethiopian Stories about the Miracles of the Virgin Mary (Täˀammərä Maryam)." In Ethiopia at the Crossroads: Exhibition Catalogue, edited by Christine Sciacca. Baltimore, MD: Walters Art Museum.
  337. Hayes, R. M. (1986). Trick cinematography: the Oscar special-effects movies. McFarland Publishing. p. 149. ISBN 978-0899501574. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  338. Ray, Nicholas (10 September 1993). Rey, Susan (ed.). I Was Interrupted: Nicholas Ray on Making Movies. University of California Press. p. 230. ISBN 978-0520916678.
  339. Keller, Rosemary Skinner; Ruether, Rosemary Radford; Cantlon, Marie (2006). Encyclopedia of Women and Religion in North America: Native American creation stories. Indiana University Press. p. 1012. ISBN 978-0253346872. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  340. Nicholson, Amy (1 August 2018). "Olivia Hussey, star of Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet: 'I was wild'". The Guardian. Guardian News & Media Limited. Archived from the original on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
  341. Lindlof, Thomas (2008). Hollywood Under Siege: Martin Scorsese, the Religious Right, and the Culture Wars. University Press of Kentucky. p. 57. ISBN 978-0813173160. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  342. O'Brien, Catherine (2011). The Celluloid Madonna: From Scripture to Screen. Columbia University Press. p. 5. ISBN 978-1906660284. Archived from the original on 18 August 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  343. "'Saint Mary' female lead Shabnam Gholikhani talks with ifilm". iFilm. 18 December 2017. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  344. Flynn, JD (6 February 2004). "Actress who plays Mary speaks of filming 'The Passion'". Catholic News Agency. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  345. Johnson, Jason B. (7 November 2006). "What race was Jesus? 'Color of the Cross' puts a different face on the debate". SFGate. Hearst Communications, Inc. Archived from the original on 18 November 2009. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  346. Roach, Erin (30 November 2006). "'Nativity Story' actress should not be shunned, leaders say". Baptist Press News. Southern Baptist Convention. Archived from the original on 27 July 2020. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  347. Riazat Butt (18 August 2007). "TV airing for Islam's story of Christ". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 November 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2014. Featured in ITV documentary.
  348. "The Muslim Jesus, ITV – Unreality Primetime". Primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk. 18 August 2007. Archived from the original on 16 October 2009. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
  349. Goodwyn, Hannah (2014). "Roma Downey and Diogo Morgado on Faith and Filming Son of God". The Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. Archived from the original on 1 May 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  350. "Mary Magdalene attempts to wash away biblical character's stains of ill repute". Irish News. 14 March 2018. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  351. Rorke, Robert (20 March 2019). "'Jesus: His Life' dispels beliefs about Christ and biblical history". NY Post. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 10 April 2019.

Further reading[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Virgin Mary Template:Jesus footer Template:Nativity of Jesus Template:Christmas Template:New Testament people Template:Gospel of Matthew Template:Gospel of Mark Template:Gospel of Luke Template:Gospel of John Template:Madonna styles Template:Symbols of Georgia (country)